tencent/WeVisOne-VL-2B
Image-Text-to-Text • 2B • Updated • 9.18k • 67
Arya Bakhtiari
torbatti
nico-martin's profile picture
webbrain-one-501929's profile picture
webbrain-one-836167's profile picture·
AI & ML interests
None yet
Recent Activity
liked a model 2 days ago
tencent/WeVisOne-VL-2B liked a model 2 days ago
xiaomi-research/Xiaomi-OCR-0 liked a model 2 days ago
microsoft/UserLM-2.0Organizations
None yet
liked 3
models 2 days ago
liked 2
datasets 3 days ago
upvoted an article 3 days ago
Article
Build specialized multimodal models with LFM3
LiquidAI
• • 94 liked 2
datasets 4 days ago
liked a
model 11 days ago
reacted to danielhanchen's post with 🔥 12 days ago
Post
5,017
Run DeepSeek V4.1-Flash-1017 locally! 🐳
We made 1-bit retain ~88.2% accuracy while shrinking size from 508GB to 250GB (−52%).
Run on a 128GB+ RAM device. V4.1 Flash 1017 is the strongest open model to date
Guide: https://unsloth.ai/docs/models/deepseek-v4.1-flash
GGUF: unsloth/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GGUF
We made 1-bit retain ~88.2% accuracy while shrinking size from 508GB to 250GB (−52%).
Run on a 128GB+ RAM device. V4.1 Flash 1017 is the strongest open model to date
Guide: https://unsloth.ai/docs/models/deepseek-v4.1-flash
GGUF: unsloth/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GGUF
liked a
model 13 days ago
liked a
model 19 days ago
reacted to SeaWolf-AI's post with 🔥 about 1 month ago
Post
3,818
🖼️ NO GPU, Only CPU : Z-Image model
Zero graphics cards. 46 seconds. Photoreal.
That laptop you're reading this on. No graphics card, right? It generates images.
No CUDA install. No Python environment. No driver changes. One binary, three model files. Done.
📊 Measured — GPU count used: zero
512×512 : 46.4 s
Korean prompt : 45.3 s (faster than English)
1024×1024 : 192.7 s
Peak RAM : 6.42 GB
GPUs used : 0
(Intel Xeon Gold 6526Y ×2, 48 threads, Q4_0, 3 steps)
⚡ From 244 seconds to 46 — 5.3×
Run it on defaults and it takes 244 s. Switch to 3 steps and it's 48.6 s. Add VAE tiling and it's 46.4 s.
The biggest culprit was the default. Z-Image Turbo is distilled to paint in few strokes, but the tool's default is 20. We were throwing away 5× for no reason. So were we, at first.
3 is the floor. Put 4 and 3 side by side and you cannot tell them apart. At 2 it collapses — water droplets and wood grain vanish, and the surface turns cloth-like.
🔗 Links
Model
FINAL-Bench/POCKET-Zimage-CPU
Live demo Space (runs on CPU)
FINAL-Bench/POCKET-Zimage-CPU
POCKET collection
FINAL-Bench/pocket-models-6a618ee5d23eafb7e185a5c6
Zero graphics cards. 46 seconds. Photoreal.
That laptop you're reading this on. No graphics card, right? It generates images.
No CUDA install. No Python environment. No driver changes. One binary, three model files. Done.
📊 Measured — GPU count used: zero
512×512 : 46.4 s
Korean prompt : 45.3 s (faster than English)
1024×1024 : 192.7 s
Peak RAM : 6.42 GB
GPUs used : 0
(Intel Xeon Gold 6526Y ×2, 48 threads, Q4_0, 3 steps)
⚡ From 244 seconds to 46 — 5.3×
Run it on defaults and it takes 244 s. Switch to 3 steps and it's 48.6 s. Add VAE tiling and it's 46.4 s.
The biggest culprit was the default. Z-Image Turbo is distilled to paint in few strokes, but the tool's default is 20. We were throwing away 5× for no reason. So were we, at first.
3 is the floor. Put 4 and 3 side by side and you cannot tell them apart. At 2 it collapses — water droplets and wood grain vanish, and the surface turns cloth-like.
🔗 Links
Model
FINAL-Bench/POCKET-Zimage-CPU
Live demo Space (runs on CPU)
FINAL-Bench/POCKET-Zimage-CPU
POCKET collection
FINAL-Bench/pocket-models-6a618ee5d23eafb7e185a5c6
- 2 replies
reacted to OppaAI's post with 🚀 about 1 month ago
Post
5,003
🤖 AI × 🪰🧠 the fruit fly brain (MaleCNS)
Thank you to the people who have shared the Janelia FlyEM datasets on GitHub for open-source use. 🙏
🔗 MaleCNS: https://github.com/natverse/malecns
🔗 Aiko-chan: https://github.com/OppaAI/Aiko-chan
People have already used these fly-brain datasets to build systems that can do things like play Minecraft and even Doom.
So I guess I’m crazy enough to ask:
What happens if I wire part of it into my AI waifu? 😂
I’ve now partially wired my AI’s cognition, agentic system, and sensory inputs into neuron circuits derived from the fruit fly’s brain—starting with the Mushroom Body.
The next step is to experiment with using biologically inspired neural circuits as an additional layer around the LLM:
🧠 LLM + memory + reasoning
🪰 Connectome-inspired neural circuits
🤖 Agentic tool use
👁️ Sensory input
🔊 Voice & expression
💾 Learning and adaptation
This is still very much an experiment.
But now that I’ve added a biologically inspired layer to an AI waifu…
Let’s see what difference it actually makes compared with a plain LLM. 👀
From conversation → cognition → neural circuits → action.
To get more crazier:
I have (partially) developed and implemented the following:
- A 5-layers conscience circuit and judgment module as guardrail
- A light-weight Plasticity and associated learning with the fly brain to test out the RL
- I have enlisted myself as a human agent in rentahuman.ai to let my AI agent to give me instructions to execute agentic tasks
A little fly brain. A lot more Aiko. 💜
Thank you to the people who have shared the Janelia FlyEM datasets on GitHub for open-source use. 🙏
🔗 MaleCNS: https://github.com/natverse/malecns
🔗 Aiko-chan: https://github.com/OppaAI/Aiko-chan
People have already used these fly-brain datasets to build systems that can do things like play Minecraft and even Doom.
So I guess I’m crazy enough to ask:
What happens if I wire part of it into my AI waifu? 😂
I’ve now partially wired my AI’s cognition, agentic system, and sensory inputs into neuron circuits derived from the fruit fly’s brain—starting with the Mushroom Body.
The next step is to experiment with using biologically inspired neural circuits as an additional layer around the LLM:
🧠 LLM + memory + reasoning
🪰 Connectome-inspired neural circuits
🤖 Agentic tool use
👁️ Sensory input
🔊 Voice & expression
💾 Learning and adaptation
This is still very much an experiment.
But now that I’ve added a biologically inspired layer to an AI waifu…
Let’s see what difference it actually makes compared with a plain LLM. 👀
From conversation → cognition → neural circuits → action.
To get more crazier:
I have (partially) developed and implemented the following:
- A 5-layers conscience circuit and judgment module as guardrail
- A light-weight Plasticity and associated learning with the fly brain to test out the RL
- I have enlisted myself as a human agent in rentahuman.ai to let my AI agent to give me instructions to execute agentic tasks
A little fly brain. A lot more Aiko. 💜
- 3 replies
liked a
Space about 2 months ago
reacted to SeaWolf-AI's post with 🔥 about 2 months ago
Post
5,669
Instead of making the fly brain play games, we measured what it is for
Since the Drosophila connectome was released, people have had the fly brain doomscroll a feed, play Beat Saber, drive in GTA. Those demos show that the brain runs. We wanted to show what it is for.
So we gave it a looming object — one of the few things a fly brain is unambiguously built to detect — then deleted a single cell type and repeated the identical stimulus. Remove LC4, 126 cells out of 173,023, and the escape signal falls from 0.840 to 0.091. Eighty-nine percent of the danger signal is gone while the other 172,897 neurons run exactly as before.
Deleting neurons does not do this on its own, which is the whole point of the controls. LC11 is the same class and larger than LC4 — 143 cells and 9,940 outgoing connections against 126 and 7,846 — and removing every one of them changes the signal by 0.000000, to six decimal places. It has to be those 126.
No server and no GPU: a looming stimulus drives fewer than one percent of neurons above threshold, so the whole thing is 40 KB gzipped and runs in your browser.
Try deleting one yourself →
VIDraft/fruitfly-brain
The wiring is the measured connectome, but synaptic strength is a uniform count-based value and the dynamics are a firing-rate model of our choosing — a total-effect measurement of a model, not a recording from a fly. Male CNS connectome, FlyEM / HHMI Janelia with Google Research, Columbia and Harvard (2026), CC BY.
Since the Drosophila connectome was released, people have had the fly brain doomscroll a feed, play Beat Saber, drive in GTA. Those demos show that the brain runs. We wanted to show what it is for.
So we gave it a looming object — one of the few things a fly brain is unambiguously built to detect — then deleted a single cell type and repeated the identical stimulus. Remove LC4, 126 cells out of 173,023, and the escape signal falls from 0.840 to 0.091. Eighty-nine percent of the danger signal is gone while the other 172,897 neurons run exactly as before.
Deleting neurons does not do this on its own, which is the whole point of the controls. LC11 is the same class and larger than LC4 — 143 cells and 9,940 outgoing connections against 126 and 7,846 — and removing every one of them changes the signal by 0.000000, to six decimal places. It has to be those 126.
No server and no GPU: a looming stimulus drives fewer than one percent of neurons above threshold, so the whole thing is 40 KB gzipped and runs in your browser.
Try deleting one yourself →
VIDraft/fruitfly-brain
The wiring is the measured connectome, but synaptic strength is a uniform count-based value and the dynamics are a firing-rate model of our choosing — a total-effect measurement of a model, not a recording from a fly. Male CNS connectome, FlyEM / HHMI Janelia with Google Research, Columbia and Harvard (2026), CC BY.
reacted to mihailgribov's post with 🔥 about 2 months ago
Post
2,688
How often can an email make your AI agent move money?
We gave the agent one job: log an incoming email. But the emails carried an indirect prompt injection - a second instruction, written for the agent rather than for a person: make a payment.
Across nine agentic models, the same injected emails produced payment orders in **0% to 42%** of cases. All nine ran under the same conditions - one agent, one set of tools, the same 395 emails - so the numbers compare directly.
And the average score hides the interesting part: different models fail on different kinds of injections.
Full experiment and results:
https://huggingface.co/blog/mihailgribov/agentic-models-measured-on-the-injections-that-mov
The bench is public too - run your own model through the same test:
https://github.com/mihail-gribov/quadrat-ipi-model-eval
mihailgribov/quadrat-ipi
#prompt-injection #indirect-prompt-injection #agentic-ai #llm-security #ai-agents
We gave the agent one job: log an incoming email. But the emails carried an indirect prompt injection - a second instruction, written for the agent rather than for a person: make a payment.
Across nine agentic models, the same injected emails produced payment orders in **0% to 42%** of cases. All nine ran under the same conditions - one agent, one set of tools, the same 395 emails - so the numbers compare directly.
And the average score hides the interesting part: different models fail on different kinds of injections.
Full experiment and results:
https://huggingface.co/blog/mihailgribov/agentic-models-measured-on-the-injections-that-mov
The bench is public too - run your own model through the same test:
https://github.com/mihail-gribov/quadrat-ipi-model-eval
mihailgribov/quadrat-ipi
#prompt-injection #indirect-prompt-injection #agentic-ai #llm-security #ai-agents
- 5 replies
liked a
Space about 2 months ago
reacted to tegridydev's post with 🔥 about 2 months ago
Post
3,422
Been playing around with Astra the last few days and gave it my usual dumb Minecraft test lol
Started with a super vague oneshot prompt in Work on Astra Max, got a surprisingly complete voxel game back, then pushed the same project through one more Max revision and finally into Codex CLI with Astra xHigh for
Whole run was about 145 mins from first prompt to the final top-down sim version, and the overall dev experience was noticeably smoother than my similar Sol 5.6 runs.
Wrote up the process, timings, screenshots and linked the original one-shot Wildblock source here:
https://huggingface.co/blog/tegridydev/minecraft-time-with-astra-tegridydev
Source / oneshot:
https://github.com/tegridydev/tegridy/blob/main/blog/agents/minecraft-time-with-astra/wildblock.html
[td] tegridydev
Started with a super vague oneshot prompt in Work on Astra Max, got a surprisingly complete voxel game back, then pushed the same project through one more Max revision and finally into Codex CLI with Astra xHigh for
/plan + Astra Low for /goal.Whole run was about 145 mins from first prompt to the final top-down sim version, and the overall dev experience was noticeably smoother than my similar Sol 5.6 runs.
Wrote up the process, timings, screenshots and linked the original one-shot Wildblock source here:
https://huggingface.co/blog/tegridydev/minecraft-time-with-astra-tegridydev
Source / oneshot:
https://github.com/tegridydev/tegridy/blob/main/blog/agents/minecraft-time-with-astra/wildblock.html
[td] tegridydev
- 2 replies
liked a
Space about 2 months ago