Instructions to use u-opsd/qwen3-8b-non-thinking with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Libraries
- PEFT
How to use u-opsd/qwen3-8b-non-thinking with PEFT:
from peft import PeftModel from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM base_model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen3-8B") model = PeftModel.from_pretrained(base_model, "u-opsd/qwen3-8b-non-thinking") - Notebooks
- Google Colab
- Kaggle
u-OPSD — Qwen3-8B (non-thinking)
LoRA adapter for Qwen/Qwen3-8B trained with unsupervised On-Policy Self-Distillation (u-OPSD): a label-free variant of OPSD in which the teacher is conditioned on a majority-vote pseudo-label derived from the model's own rollouts instead of a ground-truth solution.
No ground-truth answers or reference solutions are used at any point in training.
On five math benchmarks the adapter improves the five-benchmark average from 43.57 → 54.31 (+10.74) over the base model.
Results
Five-benchmark evaluation, non-thinking inference, temperature 1.0. AIME24 / AIME25 / HMMT25 are avg@12; MATH500 / AMC23 are avg@4.
| Model | AIME24 | AIME25 | HMMT25 | MATH500 | AMC23 | Avg. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3-8B (base) | 27.50 | 23.33 | 13.61 | 84.05 | 69.38 | 43.57 |
| SFT | 26.94 | 21.67 | 11.94 | 84.10 | 72.50 | 43.43 |
| OPSD (supervised) | 41.67 | 28.06 | 18.33 | 87.15 | 85.00 | 52.04 |
| u-OPSD (this adapter) | 45.56 | 34.72 | 18.61 | 89.55 | 83.12 | 54.31 |
The SFT and supervised OPSD rows are runs of the same codebase under the same evaluation protocol, at the same step; both consume ground-truth solutions, this adapter does not.
Usage
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
from peft import PeftModel
base = "Qwen/Qwen3-8B"
tok = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(base)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(base, torch_dtype="bfloat16", device_map="auto")
model = PeftModel.from_pretrained(model, "u-opsd/qwen3-8b-non-thinking")
messages = [{"role": "user", "content": "What is the remainder when 7^2026 is divided by 100?"}]
text = tok.apply_chat_template(
messages,
tokenize=False,
add_generation_prompt=True,
enable_thinking=False, # this adapter is trained and evaluated in non-thinking mode
)
out = model.generate(**tok(text, return_tensors="pt").to(model.device), max_new_tokens=4096)
print(tok.decode(out[0], skip_special_tokens=True))
With vLLM, pass the adapter as a LoRA request against the Qwen/Qwen3-8B base and set max_lora_rank=64.
Non-thinking only. Student and teacher were both trained with
enable_thinking=False, and all reported numbers use non-thinking inference. Enabling thinking mode is untested.
Method
For each prompt, the model samples G = 8 rollouts under the training decoding policy. The most frequent final answer becomes the pseudo-label. A prompt is kept only if the pseudo-label's share of the rollouts reaches the self-consistency threshold τ = 0.5; otherwise the prompt is dropped for that step. One rollout that disagrees with the pseudo-label is then selected at random as the distillation target, and the teacher is conditioned on an agreeing rollout in place of OPSD's ground-truth solution. Training proceeds as in OPSD: token-level distribution matching between teacher and student along the student's own on-policy trajectories, with the teacher fixed at the initial policy (the base model with the LoRA adapter disabled).
Training details
| Base model | Qwen/Qwen3-8B |
| Dataset | siyanzhao/Openthoughts_math_30k_opsd (prompts only; solutions unused) |
| Objective | token-level distribution matching, beta = 0 (forward KL) |
| Teacher | fixed at initial policy (--fixed_teacher) |
| Rollouts per prompt | 8 |
| Self-consistency threshold | 0.5 |
| Distillation rows | 1, selected at random |
| Max completion length | 4096 |
| Sampling (training) | temperature 1.1, top-p 0.95, top-k 20 |
| LoRA | r 64, alpha 128, dropout 0.05, on q/k/v/o/gate/up/down projections |
| Optimizer | lr 5e-6 with linear decay over 150 steps, max grad norm 0.1 |
| Precision | bfloat16, FlashAttention-2, gradient checkpointing |
| Rollout backend | vLLM (colocate) |
| Released checkpoint | step 150 (final) |
Evaluation protocol
vLLM, temperature 1.0, non-thinking inference. AIME24 / AIME25 / HMMT25 at 12 samples per problem, MATH500 / AMC23 at 4. Answers are verified with math_verify.
Limitations
- Single seed. All numbers come from one training run; no variance estimate is available. Repeated evaluations of the untrained base model on this suite vary by a couple of points, so treat margins of that order as suggestive.
- Scope. Trained and evaluated on English competition mathematics in non-thinking mode. Behaviour outside that scope, including thinking mode, other domains, and safety-relevant use, is untested.
- Pseudo-label noise. Supervision comes from the model's own majority vote, which can be confidently wrong; the threshold
τ = 0.5filters low-agreement prompts but does not guarantee correctness.
Citation
This adapter accompanies work in preparation on unsupervised on-policy self-distillation. It builds directly on OPSD:
@article{zhao2026self,
title={Self-Distilled Reasoner: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Large Language Models},
author={Zhao, Siyan and Xie, Zhihui and Liu, Mengchen and Huang, Jing and Pang, Guan and Chen, Feiyu and Grover, Aditya},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.18734},
year={2026}
}
- Downloads last month
- -