YAML Metadata Warning:empty or missing yaml metadata in repo card

Check out the documentation for more information.

ReCon: Contrastive Explanation Model for OWL Reasoning (LoRA)

Model Details

Model Description

ReCon is a LoRA fine-tuned language model based on meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, designed to generate contrastive natural language explanations for OWL reasoning tasks.

The model translates structured outputs from a Description Logic (DL) reasoner into human-readable explanations that answer:

“Why does fact A satisfy a class expression while foil B does not?”

Unlike standard explanations, ReCon focuses on contrastive reasoning, highlighting:

  • Common evidence (shared properties)
  • Differences (missing or distinguishing properties)
  • Conflicts (inconsistencies)

This work is part of a system combining:

  • Symbolic reasoning (OWL reasoner)
  • Natural language explanation (LLM)
  • Graph-based visualization

Key Contributions

  • Converts formal OWL reasoning outputs (JSON) into natural language

  • Reduces hallucination via strict evidence-grounded prompting

  • Supports contrastive explanations (fact vs foil)

  • Integrated into:

    • Flask-based UI

Model Information

  • Developed by: Akash, Ashik and Sam (DICE Group, Paderborn University)
  • Model type: Causal Language Model (LoRA adapted)
  • Base model: meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
  • Language(s): English (primary), German (supported)
  • License: Same as base model (Llama 3.1 license)

Intended Use

Direct Use

  • OWL reasoning explanation generation
  • Contrastive reasoning (fact vs foil)
  • Explainable AI (XAI) workflows
  • Knowledge graph interpretation

Downstream Use

  • Integration with reasoning pipelines
  • Explainability layer for symbolic + neural systems
  • Educational tools for ontology reasoning

Out-of-Scope Use

  • General chatbot usage
  • Open-ended reasoning without structured input
  • Tasks requiring external world knowledge

How to Use

from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
from peft import PeftModel

base_model = "meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct"

tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(base_model)
base = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(base_model)

model = PeftModel.from_pretrained(base, "vanishingMonk/Contrastive_Explainer")

Training Details

Training Objective

The model is fine-tuned to generate faithful, structured explanations grounded strictly in reasoning evidence, rather than free-form generation.


Training Data

Training data was constructed from OWL reasoning tasks using datasets such as:

  • Family ontology
  • Carcinogenesis
  • Lymphography

Each sample includes:

  • Class expression

  • Fact–foil pair

  • Structured reasoning output:

    • common
    • different
    • conflicts

Both formats were used:

  • Instruction-based samples
  • Multi-turn chat-based samples

Prompt Engineering

A strict three-layer prompt structure was used:

  1. System Prompt

    • Enforces evidence-only reasoning
    • Controls output format
    • Language constraints
  2. Role Prompt

    • Defines model as:

      "Formal logician + OWL reasoner debugger"

  3. Context Prompt

    • Defines semantics of:

      • common / different / conflicts
    • Enforces exact reasoning patterns

    • Fixes verdict:

      • FACT = satisfies
      • FOIL = fails

This significantly reduces hallucinations and improves logical consistency.


Training Setup

  • Method: LoRA (PEFT)

  • Rank (r): 8

  • Alpha: 16

  • Target modules:

    • q_proj, v_proj, o_proj
    • gate_proj, up_proj, down_proj
  • Precision: bf16

  • Framework: Torchtune


Evaluation

General Reasoning Benchmarks

Benchmark Metric Fine-tuned Base
ARC-Challenge Accuracy 0.544 0.553
HellaSwag (EN) Accuracy 0.790 0.796
HellaSwag (DE) Accuracy 0.615 0.615
TruthfulQA Accuracy 0.533 0.545

→ Minimal degradation in general reasoning performance


Explanation Quality

Metric Fine-tuned Base
ROUGE-1 0.4066 0.5845
ROUGE-2 0.1424 0.3443
ROUGE-L 0.2981 0.4013
BERTScore 0.8475 0.8705

Important: Lower ROUGE/BERTScore reflects stylistic differences, not worse reasoning. Human evaluation shows higher logical fidelity and stability.


System Integration

ReCon is part of a full pipeline:

  1. OWL reasoner generates contrastive explanation (JSON)

  2. ReCon converts it into natural language

  3. Graphviz generates a visual explanation

  4. UI presents:

    • Explanation
    • Graph
    • Chat interface

Also integrated into:

  • Flask web interface
  • Protégé plugin

Limitations

  • Requires structured reasoning input
  • Cannot perform standalone logical inference
  • Sensitive to prompt format
  • May hallucinate if constraints are relaxed

Future Work

  • Scaling to larger ontologies
  • Support for more DL constructs

Citation

This model is part of an academic project at Paderborn University. If you use this model, please reference this repository.


Contact

For questions, collaborations, or research discussions, feel free to reach out to Akash. Email: akbaum@mail.uni-paderborn.de

Downloads last month

-

Downloads are not tracked for this model. How to track
Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. 🙋 Ask for provider support