Upload all models and assets for bar (20251001)
Browse filesThis view is limited to 50 files because it contains too many changes.
See raw diff
- README.md +308 -141
- models/embeddings/monolingual/bar_128d.bin +2 -2
- models/embeddings/monolingual/bar_128d_metadata.json +5 -3
- models/embeddings/monolingual/bar_32d.bin +2 -2
- models/embeddings/monolingual/bar_32d_metadata.json +5 -3
- models/embeddings/monolingual/bar_64d.bin +2 -2
- models/embeddings/monolingual/bar_64d_metadata.json +5 -3
- models/subword_markov/bar_markov_ctx1_subword.parquet +2 -2
- models/subword_markov/bar_markov_ctx1_subword_metadata.json +2 -2
- models/subword_markov/bar_markov_ctx2_subword.parquet +2 -2
- models/subword_markov/bar_markov_ctx2_subword_metadata.json +2 -2
- models/subword_markov/bar_markov_ctx3_subword.parquet +2 -2
- models/subword_markov/bar_markov_ctx3_subword_metadata.json +2 -2
- models/subword_markov/bar_markov_ctx4_subword.parquet +2 -2
- models/subword_markov/bar_markov_ctx4_subword_metadata.json +2 -2
- models/subword_ngram/bar_2gram_subword.parquet +2 -2
- models/subword_ngram/bar_2gram_subword_metadata.json +2 -2
- models/subword_ngram/bar_3gram_subword.parquet +2 -2
- models/subword_ngram/bar_3gram_subword_metadata.json +2 -2
- models/subword_ngram/bar_4gram_subword.parquet +2 -2
- models/subword_ngram/bar_4gram_subword_metadata.json +2 -2
- models/tokenizer/bar_tokenizer_16k.model +2 -2
- models/tokenizer/bar_tokenizer_16k.vocab +0 -0
- models/tokenizer/bar_tokenizer_32k.model +2 -2
- models/tokenizer/bar_tokenizer_32k.vocab +0 -0
- models/tokenizer/bar_tokenizer_64k.model +2 -2
- models/tokenizer/bar_tokenizer_64k.vocab +0 -0
- models/tokenizer/bar_tokenizer_8k.model +2 -2
- models/tokenizer/bar_tokenizer_8k.vocab +0 -0
- models/vocabulary/bar_vocabulary.parquet +2 -2
- models/vocabulary/bar_vocabulary_metadata.json +10 -9
- models/word_markov/bar_markov_ctx1_word.parquet +2 -2
- models/word_markov/bar_markov_ctx1_word_metadata.json +2 -2
- models/word_markov/bar_markov_ctx2_word.parquet +2 -2
- models/word_markov/bar_markov_ctx2_word_metadata.json +2 -2
- models/word_markov/bar_markov_ctx3_word.parquet +2 -2
- models/word_markov/bar_markov_ctx3_word_metadata.json +2 -2
- models/word_markov/bar_markov_ctx4_word.parquet +2 -2
- models/word_markov/bar_markov_ctx4_word_metadata.json +2 -2
- models/word_ngram/bar_2gram_word.parquet +2 -2
- models/word_ngram/bar_2gram_word_metadata.json +2 -2
- models/word_ngram/bar_3gram_word.parquet +2 -2
- models/word_ngram/bar_3gram_word_metadata.json +2 -2
- models/word_ngram/bar_4gram_word.parquet +2 -2
- models/word_ngram/bar_4gram_word_metadata.json +2 -2
- visualizations/embedding_isotropy.png +0 -0
- visualizations/embedding_norms.png +0 -0
- visualizations/embedding_similarity.png +2 -2
- visualizations/markov_branching.png +0 -0
- visualizations/markov_contexts.png +0 -0
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -23,14 +23,14 @@ dataset_info:
|
|
| 23 |
metrics:
|
| 24 |
- name: best_compression_ratio
|
| 25 |
type: compression
|
| 26 |
-
value:
|
| 27 |
- name: best_isotropy
|
| 28 |
type: isotropy
|
| 29 |
-
value: 0.
|
| 30 |
- name: vocabulary_size
|
| 31 |
type: vocab
|
| 32 |
-
value:
|
| 33 |
-
generated:
|
| 34 |
---
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
# BAR - Wikilangs Models
|
|
@@ -44,12 +44,13 @@ We analyze tokenizers, n-gram models, Markov chains, vocabulary statistics, and
|
|
| 44 |
### Models & Assets
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
- Tokenizers (8k, 16k, 32k, 64k)
|
| 47 |
-
- N-gram models (2, 3, 4-gram)
|
| 48 |
-
- Markov chains (context of 1, 2, 3 and
|
| 49 |
- Subword N-gram and Markov chains
|
| 50 |
-
- Embeddings in various sizes and dimensions
|
| 51 |
- Language Vocabulary
|
| 52 |
- Language Statistics
|
|
|
|
| 53 |

|
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
### Analysis and Evaluation
|
|
@@ -59,7 +60,8 @@ We analyze tokenizers, n-gram models, Markov chains, vocabulary statistics, and
|
|
| 59 |
- [3. Markov Chain Evaluation](#3-markov-chain-evaluation)
|
| 60 |
- [4. Vocabulary Analysis](#4-vocabulary-analysis)
|
| 61 |
- [5. Word Embeddings Evaluation](#5-word-embeddings-evaluation)
|
| 62 |
-
- [6.
|
|
|
|
| 63 |
- [Metrics Glossary](#appendix-metrics-glossary--interpretation-guide)
|
| 64 |
- [Visualizations Index](#visualizations-index)
|
| 65 |
|
|
@@ -68,59 +70,57 @@ We analyze tokenizers, n-gram models, Markov chains, vocabulary statistics, and
|
|
| 68 |
|
| 69 |

|
| 70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 71 |
### Results
|
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
| Vocab Size | Compression | Avg Token Len | UNK Rate | Total Tokens |
|
| 74 |
|------------|-------------|---------------|----------|--------------|
|
| 75 |
-
| **8k** | 3.
|
| 76 |
-
| **16k** | 3.
|
| 77 |
-
| **32k** | 3.
|
| 78 |
-
| **64k** |
|
| 79 |
|
| 80 |
### Tokenization Examples
|
| 81 |
|
| 82 |
Below are sample sentences tokenized with each vocabulary size:
|
| 83 |
|
| 84 |
-
**Sample 1:** `
|
| 85 |
-
|
| 86 |
-
Beleg
|
| 87 |
-
|
| 88 |
-
Im Netz
|
| 89 |
-
|
| 90 |
-
Kategorie:...`
|
| 91 |
|
| 92 |
| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
|
| 93 |
|-------|--------|-------|
|
| 94 |
-
| 8k | `▁
|
| 95 |
-
| 16k | `▁
|
| 96 |
-
| 32k | `▁
|
| 97 |
-
| 64k | `▁
|
| 98 |
|
| 99 |
-
**Sample 2:** `
|
| 100 |
|
| 101 |
| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
|
| 102 |
|-------|--------|-------|
|
| 103 |
-
| 8k | `▁
|
| 104 |
-
| 16k | `▁
|
| 105 |
-
| 32k | `▁
|
| 106 |
-
| 64k | `▁
|
| 107 |
-
|
| 108 |
-
**Sample 3:** `Des is a Iwablick iwas Joar 1561.
|
| 109 |
|
| 110 |
-
|
| 111 |
|
| 112 |
| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
|
| 113 |
|-------|--------|-------|
|
| 114 |
-
| 8k | `▁
|
| 115 |
-
| 16k | `▁
|
| 116 |
-
| 32k | `▁
|
| 117 |
-
| 64k | `▁
|
| 118 |
|
| 119 |
|
| 120 |
### Key Findings
|
| 121 |
|
| 122 |
-
- **Best Compression:** 64k achieves
|
| 123 |
-
- **Lowest UNK Rate:** 8k with 0.
|
| 124 |
- **Trade-off:** Larger vocabularies improve compression but increase model size
|
| 125 |
- **Recommendation:** 32k vocabulary provides optimal balance for production use
|
| 126 |
|
|
@@ -129,57 +129,89 @@ Kategorie:...`
|
|
| 129 |
|
| 130 |

|
| 131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 132 |

|
| 133 |
|
| 134 |
### Results
|
| 135 |
|
| 136 |
-
| N-gram | Perplexity | Entropy | Unique N-grams | Top-100 Coverage | Top-1000 Coverage |
|
| 137 |
-
|
| 138 |
-
| **2-gram** |
|
| 139 |
-
| **2-gram** |
|
| 140 |
-
| **3-gram** |
|
| 141 |
-
| **3-gram** |
|
| 142 |
-
| **4-gram** |
|
| 143 |
-
| **4-gram** |
|
| 144 |
|
| 145 |
### Top 5 N-grams by Size
|
| 146 |
|
| 147 |
-
**2-grams:**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 148 |
|
| 149 |
| Rank | N-gram | Count |
|
| 150 |
|------|--------|-------|
|
| 151 |
-
| 1 | `
|
| 152 |
-
| 2 | `vo da` |
|
| 153 |
-
| 3 | `is a` |
|
| 154 |
-
| 4 | `in da` |
|
| 155 |
-
| 5 |
|
| 156 |
|
| 157 |
-
**
|
| 158 |
|
| 159 |
| Rank | N-gram | Count |
|
| 160 |
|------|--------|-------|
|
| 161 |
-
| 1 | `
|
| 162 |
-
| 2 | `
|
| 163 |
-
| 3 |
|
| 164 |
-
| 4 | `
|
| 165 |
-
| 5 |
|
| 166 |
|
| 167 |
-
**
|
| 168 |
|
| 169 |
| Rank | N-gram | Count |
|
| 170 |
|------|--------|-------|
|
| 171 |
-
| 1 |
|
| 172 |
-
| 2 |
|
| 173 |
-
| 3 | `
|
| 174 |
-
| 4 |
|
| 175 |
-
| 5 | `
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 176 |
|
| 177 |
|
| 178 |
### Key Findings
|
| 179 |
|
| 180 |
-
- **Best Perplexity:** 2-gram with
|
| 181 |
- **Entropy Trend:** Decreases with larger n-grams (more predictable)
|
| 182 |
-
- **Coverage:** Top-1000 patterns cover ~
|
| 183 |
- **Recommendation:** 4-gram or 5-gram for best predictive performance
|
| 184 |
|
| 185 |
---
|
|
@@ -187,55 +219,86 @@ Kategorie:...`
|
|
| 187 |
|
| 188 |

|
| 189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 190 |

|
| 191 |
|
| 192 |
### Results
|
| 193 |
|
| 194 |
-
| Context | Avg Entropy | Perplexity | Branching Factor | Unique Contexts | Predictability |
|
| 195 |
-
|
| 196 |
-
| **1** | 0.
|
| 197 |
-
| **1** |
|
| 198 |
-
| **2** | 0.
|
| 199 |
-
| **2** | 0.
|
| 200 |
-
| **3** | 0.
|
| 201 |
-
| **3** | 0.
|
| 202 |
-
| **4** | 0.
|
| 203 |
-
| **4** | 0.
|
| 204 |
|
| 205 |
-
### Generated Text Samples
|
| 206 |
|
| 207 |
-
Below are text samples generated from each Markov chain model:
|
| 208 |
|
| 209 |
**Context Size 1:**
|
| 210 |
|
| 211 |
-
1.
|
| 212 |
-
2.
|
| 213 |
-
3.
|
| 214 |
|
| 215 |
**Context Size 2:**
|
| 216 |
|
| 217 |
-
1. `
|
| 218 |
-
2. `
|
| 219 |
-
3. `
|
| 220 |
|
| 221 |
**Context Size 3:**
|
| 222 |
|
| 223 |
-
1. `
|
| 224 |
-
2. `
|
| 225 |
-
3. `
|
| 226 |
|
| 227 |
**Context Size 4:**
|
| 228 |
|
| 229 |
-
1.
|
| 230 |
-
2.
|
| 231 |
-
3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 232 |
|
| 233 |
|
| 234 |
### Key Findings
|
| 235 |
|
| 236 |
-
- **Best Predictability:** Context-4 with
|
| 237 |
- **Branching Factor:** Decreases with context size (more deterministic)
|
| 238 |
-
- **Memory Trade-off:** Larger contexts require more storage (
|
| 239 |
- **Recommendation:** Context-3 or Context-4 for text generation
|
| 240 |
|
| 241 |
---
|
|
@@ -251,64 +314,64 @@ Below are text samples generated from each Markov chain model:
|
|
| 251 |
|
| 252 |
| Metric | Value |
|
| 253 |
|--------|-------|
|
| 254 |
-
| Vocabulary Size |
|
| 255 |
-
| Total Tokens | 5,
|
| 256 |
-
| Mean Frequency |
|
| 257 |
| Median Frequency | 3 |
|
| 258 |
-
| Frequency Std Dev |
|
| 259 |
|
| 260 |
### Most Common Words
|
| 261 |
|
| 262 |
| Rank | Word | Frequency |
|
| 263 |
|------|------|-----------|
|
| 264 |
-
| 1 | de |
|
| 265 |
-
| 2 | da |
|
| 266 |
-
| 3 | und |
|
| 267 |
-
| 4 | in | 102,
|
| 268 |
-
| 5 | a |
|
| 269 |
-
| 6 | vo | 92,
|
| 270 |
-
| 7 | is |
|
| 271 |
-
| 8 | im | 71,
|
| 272 |
-
| 9 |
|
| 273 |
-
| 10 |
|
| 274 |
|
| 275 |
### Least Common Words (from vocabulary)
|
| 276 |
|
| 277 |
| Rank | Word | Frequency |
|
| 278 |
|------|------|-----------|
|
| 279 |
-
| 1 |
|
| 280 |
-
| 2 |
|
| 281 |
-
| 3 |
|
| 282 |
-
| 4 |
|
| 283 |
-
| 5 |
|
| 284 |
-
| 6 |
|
| 285 |
-
| 7 |
|
| 286 |
-
| 8 |
|
| 287 |
-
| 9 |
|
| 288 |
-
| 10 |
|
| 289 |
|
| 290 |
### Zipf's Law Analysis
|
| 291 |
|
| 292 |
| Metric | Value |
|
| 293 |
|--------|-------|
|
| 294 |
-
| Zipf Coefficient | 0.
|
| 295 |
-
| R² (Goodness of Fit) | 0.
|
| 296 |
| Adherence Quality | **excellent** |
|
| 297 |
|
| 298 |
### Coverage Analysis
|
| 299 |
|
| 300 |
| Top N Words | Coverage |
|
| 301 |
|-------------|----------|
|
| 302 |
-
| Top 100 |
|
| 303 |
-
| Top 1,000 |
|
| 304 |
-
| Top 5,000 | 70.
|
| 305 |
-
| Top 10,000 | 76.
|
| 306 |
|
| 307 |
### Key Findings
|
| 308 |
|
| 309 |
-
- **Zipf Compliance:** R²=0.
|
| 310 |
-
- **High Frequency Dominance:** Top 100 words cover
|
| 311 |
-
- **Long Tail:**
|
| 312 |
|
| 313 |
---
|
| 314 |
## 5. Word Embeddings Evaluation
|
|
@@ -321,24 +384,125 @@ Below are text samples generated from each Markov chain model:
|
|
| 321 |
|
| 322 |

|
| 323 |
|
| 324 |
-
### Model Comparison
|
| 325 |
|
| 326 |
-
|
| 327 |
-
|
| 328 |
-
|
| 329 |
-
|
| 330 |
-
|
| 331 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 332 |
|
| 333 |
### Key Findings
|
| 334 |
|
| 335 |
-
- **Best Isotropy:** mono_64d with 0.
|
| 336 |
-
- **
|
| 337 |
-
- **
|
| 338 |
-
- **Recommendation:**
|
| 339 |
|
| 340 |
---
|
| 341 |
-
## 6.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 342 |
|
| 343 |

|
| 344 |
|
|
@@ -346,11 +510,12 @@ Below are text samples generated from each Markov chain model:
|
|
| 346 |
|
| 347 |
| Component | Recommended | Rationale |
|
| 348 |
|-----------|-------------|-----------|
|
| 349 |
-
| Tokenizer | **
|
| 350 |
-
| N-gram | **
|
| 351 |
-
| Markov | **Context-4** | Highest predictability (
|
| 352 |
| Embeddings | **100d** | Balanced semantic capture and isotropy |
|
| 353 |
|
|
|
|
| 354 |
---
|
| 355 |
## Appendix: Metrics Glossary & Interpretation Guide
|
| 356 |
|
|
@@ -540,7 +705,8 @@ If you use these models in your research, please cite:
|
|
| 540 |
author = {Kamali, Omar},
|
| 541 |
title = {Wikilangs: Open NLP Models for Wikipedia Languages},
|
| 542 |
year = {2025},
|
| 543 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 544 |
url = {https://huggingface.co/wikilangs}
|
| 545 |
institution = {Omneity Labs}
|
| 546 |
}
|
|
@@ -556,7 +722,8 @@ MIT License - Free for academic and commercial use.
|
|
| 556 |
- 🤗 Models: [huggingface.co/wikilangs](https://huggingface.co/wikilangs)
|
| 557 |
- 📊 Data: [wikipedia-monthly](https://huggingface.co/datasets/omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly)
|
| 558 |
- 👤 Author: [Omar Kamali](https://huggingface.co/omarkamali)
|
|
|
|
| 559 |
---
|
| 560 |
*Generated by Wikilangs Models Pipeline*
|
| 561 |
|
| 562 |
-
*Report Date:
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
metrics:
|
| 24 |
- name: best_compression_ratio
|
| 25 |
type: compression
|
| 26 |
+
value: 4.002
|
| 27 |
- name: best_isotropy
|
| 28 |
type: isotropy
|
| 29 |
+
value: 0.8442
|
| 30 |
- name: vocabulary_size
|
| 31 |
type: vocab
|
| 32 |
+
value: 0
|
| 33 |
+
generated: 2026-01-03
|
| 34 |
---
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
# BAR - Wikilangs Models
|
|
|
|
| 44 |
### Models & Assets
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
- Tokenizers (8k, 16k, 32k, 64k)
|
| 47 |
+
- N-gram models (2, 3, 4, 5-gram)
|
| 48 |
+
- Markov chains (context of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5)
|
| 49 |
- Subword N-gram and Markov chains
|
| 50 |
+
- Embeddings in various sizes and dimensions (aligned and unaligned)
|
| 51 |
- Language Vocabulary
|
| 52 |
- Language Statistics
|
| 53 |
+
|
| 54 |

|
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
### Analysis and Evaluation
|
|
|
|
| 60 |
- [3. Markov Chain Evaluation](#3-markov-chain-evaluation)
|
| 61 |
- [4. Vocabulary Analysis](#4-vocabulary-analysis)
|
| 62 |
- [5. Word Embeddings Evaluation](#5-word-embeddings-evaluation)
|
| 63 |
+
- [6. Morphological Analysis (Experimental)](#6-morphological-analysis)
|
| 64 |
+
- [7. Summary & Recommendations](#7-summary--recommendations)
|
| 65 |
- [Metrics Glossary](#appendix-metrics-glossary--interpretation-guide)
|
| 66 |
- [Visualizations Index](#visualizations-index)
|
| 67 |
|
|
|
|
| 70 |
|
| 71 |

|
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
+

|
| 74 |
+
|
| 75 |
+

|
| 76 |
+
|
| 77 |
+

|
| 78 |
+
|
| 79 |
### Results
|
| 80 |
|
| 81 |
| Vocab Size | Compression | Avg Token Len | UNK Rate | Total Tokens |
|
| 82 |
|------------|-------------|---------------|----------|--------------|
|
| 83 |
+
| **8k** | 3.167x | 3.17 | 0.0429% | 1,049,729 |
|
| 84 |
+
| **16k** | 3.475x | 3.48 | 0.0470% | 956,699 |
|
| 85 |
+
| **32k** | 3.752x | 3.75 | 0.0508% | 885,998 |
|
| 86 |
+
| **64k** | 4.002x 🏆 | 4.00 | 0.0542% | 830,614 |
|
| 87 |
|
| 88 |
### Tokenization Examples
|
| 89 |
|
| 90 |
Below are sample sentences tokenized with each vocabulary size:
|
| 91 |
|
| 92 |
+
**Sample 1:** `Buffalo County Obgruafa am 22. Feba is a County in Wisconsin in da USA. Beleg Im...`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 93 |
|
| 94 |
| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
|
| 95 |
|-------|--------|-------|
|
| 96 |
+
| 8k | `▁buffalo ▁county ▁obgruafa ▁am ▁ 2 2 . ▁feba ▁is ... (+13 more)` | 23 |
|
| 97 |
+
| 16k | `▁buffalo ▁county ▁obgruafa ▁am ▁ 2 2 . ▁feba ▁is ... (+13 more)` | 23 |
|
| 98 |
+
| 32k | `▁buffalo ▁county ▁obgruafa ▁am ▁ 2 2 . ▁feba ▁is ... (+13 more)` | 23 |
|
| 99 |
+
| 64k | `▁buffalo ▁county ▁obgruafa ▁am ▁ 2 2 . ▁feba ▁is ... (+13 more)` | 23 |
|
| 100 |
|
| 101 |
+
**Sample 2:** `Fauquier County. Obgruafa am 22. Feba is a County in Virginia in da USA. Beleg I...`
|
| 102 |
|
| 103 |
| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
|
| 104 |
|-------|--------|-------|
|
| 105 |
+
| 8k | `▁f au qui er ▁county . ▁obgruafa ▁am ▁ 2 ... (+17 more)` | 27 |
|
| 106 |
+
| 16k | `▁f au qui er ▁county . ▁obgruafa ▁am ▁ 2 ... (+17 more)` | 27 |
|
| 107 |
+
| 32k | `▁fau qui er ▁county . ▁obgruafa ▁am ▁ 2 2 ... (+16 more)` | 26 |
|
| 108 |
+
| 64k | `▁fau qui er ▁county . ▁obgruafa ▁am ▁ 2 2 ... (+16 more)` | 26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 109 |
|
| 110 |
+
**Sample 3:** `Carlow stähd fia: Carlow, Stod in Irland County Carlow, irische Grofschoft Carlo...`
|
| 111 |
|
| 112 |
| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
|
| 113 |
|-------|--------|-------|
|
| 114 |
+
| 8k | `▁carl ow ▁stähd ▁fia : ▁carl ow , ▁stod ▁in ... (+18 more)` | 28 |
|
| 115 |
+
| 16k | `▁carl ow ▁stähd ▁fia : ▁carl ow , ▁stod ▁in ... (+17 more)` | 27 |
|
| 116 |
+
| 32k | `▁carl ow ▁stähd ▁fia : ▁carl ow , ▁stod ▁in ... (+16 more)` | 26 |
|
| 117 |
+
| 64k | `▁carlow ▁stähd ▁fia : ▁carlow , ▁stod ▁in ▁irland ▁county ... (+10 more)` | 20 |
|
| 118 |
|
| 119 |
|
| 120 |
### Key Findings
|
| 121 |
|
| 122 |
+
- **Best Compression:** 64k achieves 4.002x compression
|
| 123 |
+
- **Lowest UNK Rate:** 8k with 0.0429% unknown tokens
|
| 124 |
- **Trade-off:** Larger vocabularies improve compression but increase model size
|
| 125 |
- **Recommendation:** 32k vocabulary provides optimal balance for production use
|
| 126 |
|
|
|
|
| 129 |
|
| 130 |

|
| 131 |
|
| 132 |
+

|
| 133 |
+
|
| 134 |

|
| 135 |
|
| 136 |
### Results
|
| 137 |
|
| 138 |
+
| N-gram | Variant | Perplexity | Entropy | Unique N-grams | Top-100 Coverage | Top-1000 Coverage |
|
| 139 |
+
|--------|---------|------------|---------|----------------|------------------|-------------------|
|
| 140 |
+
| **2-gram** | Word | 27,417 | 14.74 | 110,635 | 12.9% | 31.4% |
|
| 141 |
+
| **2-gram** | Subword | 362 🏆 | 8.50 | 7,805 | 60.7% | 98.3% |
|
| 142 |
+
| **3-gram** | Word | 41,058 | 15.33 | 129,534 | 12.6% | 26.5% |
|
| 143 |
+
| **3-gram** | Subword | 3,802 | 11.89 | 63,080 | 20.6% | 60.8% |
|
| 144 |
+
| **4-gram** | Word | 57,367 | 15.81 | 187,348 | 13.7% | 25.1% |
|
| 145 |
+
| **4-gram** | Subword | 27,463 | 14.75 | 363,810 | 9.1% | 28.4% |
|
| 146 |
|
| 147 |
### Top 5 N-grams by Size
|
| 148 |
|
| 149 |
+
**2-grams (Word):**
|
| 150 |
+
|
| 151 |
+
| Rank | N-gram | Count |
|
| 152 |
+
|------|--------|-------|
|
| 153 |
+
| 1 | `vo da` | 26,665 |
|
| 154 |
+
| 2 | `is a` | 22,998 |
|
| 155 |
+
| 3 | `in da` | 22,567 |
|
| 156 |
+
| 4 | `im netz` | 14,649 |
|
| 157 |
+
| 5 | `vo de` | 13,503 |
|
| 158 |
+
|
| 159 |
+
**3-grams (Word):**
|
| 160 |
+
|
| 161 |
+
| Rank | N-gram | Count |
|
| 162 |
+
|------|--------|-------|
|
| 163 |
+
| 1 | `beleg im netz` | 3,527 |
|
| 164 |
+
| 2 | `in da usa` | 3,478 |
|
| 165 |
+
| 3 | `da beziak hod` | 2,393 |
|
| 166 |
+
| 4 | `des is a` | 2,037 |
|
| 167 |
+
| 5 | `im netz in` | 2,001 |
|
| 168 |
+
|
| 169 |
+
**4-grams (Word):**
|
| 170 |
|
| 171 |
| Rank | N-gram | Count |
|
| 172 |
|------|--------|-------|
|
| 173 |
+
| 1 | `beleg im netz in` | 1,573 |
|
| 174 |
+
| 2 | `da sitz vo da` | 1,483 |
|
| 175 |
+
| 3 | `is a county in` | 1,429 |
|
| 176 |
+
| 4 | `in da usa da` | 1,407 |
|
| 177 |
+
| 5 | `a katastralgmoa in da` | 1,387 |
|
| 178 |
|
| 179 |
+
**2-grams (Subword):**
|
| 180 |
|
| 181 |
| Rank | N-gram | Count |
|
| 182 |
|------|--------|-------|
|
| 183 |
+
| 1 | `n _` | 706,670 |
|
| 184 |
+
| 2 | `a _` | 671,532 |
|
| 185 |
+
| 3 | `c h` | 640,658 |
|
| 186 |
+
| 4 | `_ d` | 560,830 |
|
| 187 |
+
| 5 | `e _` | 482,452 |
|
| 188 |
|
| 189 |
+
**3-grams (Subword):**
|
| 190 |
|
| 191 |
| Rank | N-gram | Count |
|
| 192 |
|------|--------|-------|
|
| 193 |
+
| 1 | `s c h` | 305,657 |
|
| 194 |
+
| 2 | `_ d e` | 255,292 |
|
| 195 |
+
| 3 | `_ d a` | 174,094 |
|
| 196 |
+
| 4 | `n d _` | 170,331 |
|
| 197 |
+
| 5 | `d a _` | 169,070 |
|
| 198 |
+
|
| 199 |
+
**4-grams (Subword):**
|
| 200 |
+
|
| 201 |
+
| Rank | N-gram | Count |
|
| 202 |
+
|------|--------|-------|
|
| 203 |
+
| 1 | `_ d a _` | 133,118 |
|
| 204 |
+
| 2 | `_ d e _` | 131,138 |
|
| 205 |
+
| 3 | `u n d _` | 128,509 |
|
| 206 |
+
| 4 | `_ u n d` | 120,455 |
|
| 207 |
+
| 5 | `i s c h` | 100,072 |
|
| 208 |
|
| 209 |
|
| 210 |
### Key Findings
|
| 211 |
|
| 212 |
+
- **Best Perplexity:** 2-gram (subword) with 362
|
| 213 |
- **Entropy Trend:** Decreases with larger n-grams (more predictable)
|
| 214 |
+
- **Coverage:** Top-1000 patterns cover ~28% of corpus
|
| 215 |
- **Recommendation:** 4-gram or 5-gram for best predictive performance
|
| 216 |
|
| 217 |
---
|
|
|
|
| 219 |
|
| 220 |

|
| 221 |
|
| 222 |
+

|
| 223 |
+
|
| 224 |

|
| 225 |
|
| 226 |
### Results
|
| 227 |
|
| 228 |
+
| Context | Variant | Avg Entropy | Perplexity | Branching Factor | Unique Contexts | Predictability |
|
| 229 |
+
|---------|---------|-------------|------------|------------------|-----------------|----------------|
|
| 230 |
+
| **1** | Word | 0.7091 | 1.635 | 5.19 | 569,846 | 29.1% |
|
| 231 |
+
| **1** | Subword | 0.9426 | 1.922 | 6.61 | 3,388 | 5.7% |
|
| 232 |
+
| **2** | Word | 0.2116 | 1.158 | 1.52 | 2,948,968 | 78.8% |
|
| 233 |
+
| **2** | Subword | 0.9158 | 1.887 | 5.85 | 22,382 | 8.4% |
|
| 234 |
+
| **3** | Word | 0.0664 | 1.047 | 1.12 | 4,475,523 | 93.4% |
|
| 235 |
+
| **3** | Subword | 0.8683 | 1.826 | 4.67 | 130,801 | 13.2% |
|
| 236 |
+
| **4** | Word | 0.0224 🏆 | 1.016 | 1.04 | 4,973,907 | 97.8% |
|
| 237 |
+
| **4** | Subword | 0.7777 | 1.714 | 3.53 | 610,360 | 22.2% |
|
| 238 |
|
| 239 |
+
### Generated Text Samples (Word-based)
|
| 240 |
|
| 241 |
+
Below are text samples generated from each word-based Markov chain model:
|
| 242 |
|
| 243 |
**Context Size 1:**
|
| 244 |
|
| 245 |
+
1. `de flugsauria buidns de knaj oda negakuss domois ghairat hod direkt in den jüngling oder goar`
|
| 246 |
+
2. `da insl blaagad hom niks gwisst hod a öatschoft im netz hoamseitn vo mercia zrugg mei`
|
| 247 |
+
3. `und is er im neich augleande mocha oda z himinbjörg und ů und san letztle zua`
|
| 248 |
|
| 249 |
**Context Size 2:**
|
| 250 |
|
| 251 |
+
1. `vo da vawoitung is in n gensatz za altn welt is a bleamalkiag ausgoat und in bemen`
|
| 252 |
+
2. `is a urtschoft und a jeda miassat eintritt brandln dann war des eagebnis vo de großn industriezentre...`
|
| 253 |
+
3. `in da usa on da anderson mesa in da langobardischn ehefrow vom kini ludwig i vo habsbuag`
|
| 254 |
|
| 255 |
**Context Size 3:**
|
| 256 |
|
| 257 |
+
1. `in da usa beleg im netz in south carolina in da usa da beziak hod a fläche vo`
|
| 258 |
+
2. `beleg im netz eana hoamseitn eana myspace seitn eana facebook seitn volksmusik`
|
| 259 |
+
3. `da beziak hod a fläch vo 802 km af dena 49 970 eihwohna lem stond gmoana da powiat`
|
| 260 |
|
| 261 |
**Context Size 4:**
|
| 262 |
|
| 263 |
+
1. `beleg im netz in der normandie im département seine maritime in da region normandie ea liegd im arro...`
|
| 264 |
+
2. `da sitz vo da vawoitung is lake city da beziak hod a flächn vo quadratkilometa dovo san 1 quadratkil...`
|
| 265 |
+
3. `is a county in virginia in da usa beleg im netz in missouri`
|
| 266 |
+
|
| 267 |
+
|
| 268 |
+
### Generated Text Samples (Subword-based)
|
| 269 |
+
|
| 270 |
+
Below are text samples generated from each subword-based Markov chain model:
|
| 271 |
+
|
| 272 |
+
**Context Size 1:**
|
| 273 |
+
|
| 274 |
+
1. `_heerinznachrnea`
|
| 275 |
+
2. `an_knenant_getun`
|
| 276 |
+
3. `eichaumo_bh_ll,_`
|
| 277 |
+
|
| 278 |
+
**Context Size 2:**
|
| 279 |
+
|
| 280 |
+
1. `n_de_autz)_val_(z`
|
| 281 |
+
2. `a_berseeka)_trejn`
|
| 282 |
+
3. `chulretiveicittbo`
|
| 283 |
+
|
| 284 |
+
**Context Size 3:**
|
| 285 |
+
|
| 286 |
+
1. `sch-wei_in_de_im_o`
|
| 287 |
+
2. `_der_schaubind_so_`
|
| 288 |
+
3. `_da_hamation_phana`
|
| 289 |
+
|
| 290 |
+
**Context Size 4:**
|
| 291 |
+
|
| 292 |
+
1. `_da_sicht_große_sog`
|
| 293 |
+
2. `_de_kompillatinen_t`
|
| 294 |
+
3. `und_europäischen_(a`
|
| 295 |
|
| 296 |
|
| 297 |
### Key Findings
|
| 298 |
|
| 299 |
+
- **Best Predictability:** Context-4 (word) with 97.8% predictability
|
| 300 |
- **Branching Factor:** Decreases with context size (more deterministic)
|
| 301 |
+
- **Memory Trade-off:** Larger contexts require more storage (610,360 contexts)
|
| 302 |
- **Recommendation:** Context-3 or Context-4 for text generation
|
| 303 |
|
| 304 |
---
|
|
|
|
| 314 |
|
| 315 |
| Metric | Value |
|
| 316 |
|--------|-------|
|
| 317 |
+
| Vocabulary Size | 213,465 |
|
| 318 |
+
| Total Tokens | 5,378,004 |
|
| 319 |
+
| Mean Frequency | 25.19 |
|
| 320 |
| Median Frequency | 3 |
|
| 321 |
+
| Frequency Std Dev | 715.69 |
|
| 322 |
|
| 323 |
### Most Common Words
|
| 324 |
|
| 325 |
| Rank | Word | Frequency |
|
| 326 |
|------|------|-----------|
|
| 327 |
+
| 1 | de | 137,737 |
|
| 328 |
+
| 2 | da | 137,316 |
|
| 329 |
+
| 3 | und | 119,692 |
|
| 330 |
+
| 4 | in | 102,651 |
|
| 331 |
+
| 5 | a | 92,739 |
|
| 332 |
+
| 6 | vo | 92,570 |
|
| 333 |
+
| 7 | is | 86,950 |
|
| 334 |
+
| 8 | im | 71,173 |
|
| 335 |
+
| 9 | des | 34,457 |
|
| 336 |
+
| 10 | hod | 30,772 |
|
| 337 |
|
| 338 |
### Least Common Words (from vocabulary)
|
| 339 |
|
| 340 |
| Rank | Word | Frequency |
|
| 341 |
|------|------|-----------|
|
| 342 |
+
| 1 | vorarlberga | 2 |
|
| 343 |
+
| 2 | opfenbach | 2 |
|
| 344 |
+
| 3 | raubibafäi | 2 |
|
| 345 |
+
| 4 | marcianopel | 2 |
|
| 346 |
+
| 5 | sachtler | 2 |
|
| 347 |
+
| 6 | vitec | 2 |
|
| 348 |
+
| 7 | videocom | 2 |
|
| 349 |
+
| 8 | promovierten | 2 |
|
| 350 |
+
| 9 | mechanisches | 2 |
|
| 351 |
+
| 10 | stabilisierungssystem | 2 |
|
| 352 |
|
| 353 |
### Zipf's Law Analysis
|
| 354 |
|
| 355 |
| Metric | Value |
|
| 356 |
|--------|-------|
|
| 357 |
+
| Zipf Coefficient | 0.9728 |
|
| 358 |
+
| R² (Goodness of Fit) | 0.999432 |
|
| 359 |
| Adherence Quality | **excellent** |
|
| 360 |
|
| 361 |
### Coverage Analysis
|
| 362 |
|
| 363 |
| Top N Words | Coverage |
|
| 364 |
|-------------|----------|
|
| 365 |
+
| Top 100 | 34.1% |
|
| 366 |
+
| Top 1,000 | 55.0% |
|
| 367 |
+
| Top 5,000 | 70.0% |
|
| 368 |
+
| Top 10,000 | 76.7% |
|
| 369 |
|
| 370 |
### Key Findings
|
| 371 |
|
| 372 |
+
- **Zipf Compliance:** R²=0.9994 indicates excellent adherence to Zipf's law
|
| 373 |
+
- **High Frequency Dominance:** Top 100 words cover 34.1% of corpus
|
| 374 |
+
- **Long Tail:** 203,465 words needed for remaining 23.3% coverage
|
| 375 |
|
| 376 |
---
|
| 377 |
## 5. Word Embeddings Evaluation
|
|
|
|
| 384 |
|
| 385 |

|
| 386 |
|
|
|
|
| 387 |
|
| 388 |
+
### 5.1 Cross-Lingual Alignment
|
| 389 |
+
|
| 390 |
+
> *Note: Multilingual alignment visualization not available for this language.*
|
| 391 |
+
|
| 392 |
+
|
| 393 |
+
### 5.2 Model Comparison
|
| 394 |
+
|
| 395 |
+
| Model | Dimension | Isotropy | Semantic Density | Alignment R@1 | Alignment R@10 |
|
| 396 |
+
|-------|-----------|----------|------------------|---------------|----------------|
|
| 397 |
+
| **mono_32d** | 32 | 0.8230 | 0.3300 | N/A | N/A |
|
| 398 |
+
| **mono_64d** | 64 | 0.8442 🏆 | 0.2564 | N/A | N/A |
|
| 399 |
+
| **mono_128d** | 128 | 0.8427 | 0.1773 | N/A | N/A |
|
| 400 |
|
| 401 |
### Key Findings
|
| 402 |
|
| 403 |
+
- **Best Isotropy:** mono_64d with 0.8442 (more uniform distribution)
|
| 404 |
+
- **Semantic Density:** Average pairwise similarity of 0.2546. Lower values indicate better semantic separation.
|
| 405 |
+
- **Alignment Quality:** No aligned models evaluated in this run.
|
| 406 |
+
- **Recommendation:** 128d aligned for best cross-lingual performance
|
| 407 |
|
| 408 |
---
|
| 409 |
+
## 6. Morphological Analysis (Experimental)
|
| 410 |
+
|
| 411 |
+
> ⚠️ **Warning:** This language shows low morphological productivity. The statistical signals used for this analysis may be noisy or less reliable than for morphologically rich languages.
|
| 412 |
+
|
| 413 |
+
This section presents an automated morphological analysis derived from the statistical divergence between word-level and subword-level models. By analyzing where subword predictability spikes and where word-level coverage fails, we can infer linguistic structures without supervised data.
|
| 414 |
+
|
| 415 |
+
### 6.1 Productivity & Complexity
|
| 416 |
+
|
| 417 |
+
| Metric | Value | Interpretation | Recommendation |
|
| 418 |
+
|--------|-------|----------------|----------------|
|
| 419 |
+
| Productivity Index | **0.000** | Low morphological productivity | ⚠️ Likely unreliable |
|
| 420 |
+
| Idiomaticity Gap | **-1.000** | Low formulaic content | - |
|
| 421 |
+
|
| 422 |
+
### 6.2 Affix Inventory (Productive Units)
|
| 423 |
+
|
| 424 |
+
These are the most productive prefixes and suffixes identified by sampling the vocabulary for global substitutability patterns. A unit is considered an affix if stripping it leaves a valid stem that appears in other contexts.
|
| 425 |
+
|
| 426 |
+
#### Productive Prefixes
|
| 427 |
+
| Prefix | Examples |
|
| 428 |
+
|--------|----------|
|
| 429 |
+
| `-be` | begleitendn, bewohnde, bewiabt |
|
| 430 |
+
| `-sc` | schwingt, schienengebundenen, schwefelhölzern |
|
| 431 |
+
|
| 432 |
+
#### Productive Suffixes
|
| 433 |
+
| Suffix | Examples |
|
| 434 |
+
|--------|----------|
|
| 435 |
+
| `-n` | begleitendn, lesegerätn, clipperton |
|
| 436 |
+
| `-en` | warmgemäßigten, alanen, aussen |
|
| 437 |
+
| `-er` | puppentheater, kirchenmusiker, rothmüller |
|
| 438 |
+
| `-ng` | hamhŭng, polung, urauffüahrung |
|
| 439 |
+
| `-ch` | woifschbouch, mittlboarisch, meafoch |
|
| 440 |
+
|
| 441 |
+
### 6.3 Bound Stems (Lexical Roots)
|
| 442 |
+
|
| 443 |
+
Bound stems are high-frequency subword units that are semantically cohesive but rarely appear as standalone words. These often correspond to the 'core' of a word that requires inflection or derivation to be valid.
|
| 444 |
+
|
| 445 |
+
| Stem | Cohesion | Substitutability | Examples |
|
| 446 |
+
|------|----------|------------------|----------|
|
| 447 |
+
| `icht` | 1.84x | 346 contexts | richt, eicht, dicht |
|
| 448 |
+
| `schr` | 2.11x | 137 contexts | schrei, schräg, schrag |
|
| 449 |
+
| `gsch` | 1.93x | 181 contexts | gschdö, gscher, gschod |
|
| 450 |
+
| `schl` | 1.64x | 288 contexts | eschl, ischl, göschl |
|
| 451 |
+
| `chte` | 1.70x | 217 contexts | åchte, echte, ochte |
|
| 452 |
+
| `itsc` | 2.10x | 64 contexts | gitsch, kitsch, nitsch |
|
| 453 |
+
| `chof` | 2.22x | 50 contexts | schof, schofn, schoft |
|
| 454 |
+
| `tlic` | 1.76x | 137 contexts | etlich, etlichs, rötlich |
|
| 455 |
+
| `atio` | 2.18x | 45 contexts | natio, ratio, nation |
|
| 456 |
+
| `nisc` | 1.72x | 127 contexts | nisch, nischt, nischn |
|
| 457 |
+
| `ichn` | 1.97x | 68 contexts | eichn, suichn, zoichn |
|
| 458 |
+
| `uach` | 1.78x | 99 contexts | duach, buach, suach |
|
| 459 |
+
|
| 460 |
+
### 6.4 Affix Compatibility (Co-occurrence)
|
| 461 |
+
|
| 462 |
+
This table shows which prefixes and suffixes most frequently co-occur on the same stems, revealing the 'stacking' rules of the language's morphology.
|
| 463 |
+
|
| 464 |
+
| Prefix | Suffix | Frequency | Examples |
|
| 465 |
+
|--------|--------|-----------|----------|
|
| 466 |
+
| `-sc` | `-n` | 53 words | schleierbaracken, schüidln |
|
| 467 |
+
| `-be` | `-n` | 43 words | betroffanan, berichtigungen |
|
| 468 |
+
| `-sc` | `-en` | 13 words | schleierbaracken, schnupfen |
|
| 469 |
+
| `-be` | `-ng` | 13 words | bevejkarungsentwigglung, bereicherung |
|
| 470 |
+
| `-sc` | `-er` | 13 words | schimpfkalender, schweller |
|
| 471 |
+
| `-sc` | `-ch` | 10 words | schrambach, schpruch |
|
| 472 |
+
| `-be` | `-en` | 9 words | berichtigungen, beten |
|
| 473 |
+
| `-be` | `-ch` | 4 words | besuch, bessenbach |
|
| 474 |
+
| `-be` | `-er` | 3 words | bettinger, berghammer |
|
| 475 |
+
| `-sc` | `-ng` | 3 words | schoidruckpeglmindarung, schiefling |
|
| 476 |
+
|
| 477 |
+
### 6.5 Recursive Morpheme Segmentation
|
| 478 |
+
|
| 479 |
+
Using **Recursive Hierarchical Substitutability**, we decompose complex words into their constituent morphemes. This approach handles nested affixes (e.g., `prefix-prefix-root-suffix`).
|
| 480 |
+
|
| 481 |
+
| Word | Suggested Split | Confidence | Stem |
|
| 482 |
+
|------|-----------------|------------|------|
|
| 483 |
+
| betreiber | **`be-treib-er`** | 6.0 | `treib` |
|
| 484 |
+
| vorarlberger | **`vorarlberg-er`** | 4.5 | `vorarlberg` |
|
| 485 |
+
| verkaufen | **`verkauf-en`** | 4.5 | `verkauf` |
|
| 486 |
+
| grotesken | **`grotesk-en`** | 4.5 | `grotesk` |
|
| 487 |
+
| schwabinger | **`sc-hwabi-ng-er`** | 4.5 | `hwabi` |
|
| 488 |
+
| gsprochenen | **`gspro-ch-en-en`** | 4.5 | `gspro` |
|
| 489 |
+
| waxenberger | **`waxenberg-er`** | 4.5 | `waxenberg` |
|
| 490 |
+
| scheazhoft | **`sc-heazhoft`** | 4.5 | `heazhoft` |
|
| 491 |
+
| gebildeten | **`gebildet-en`** | 4.5 | `gebildet` |
|
| 492 |
+
| carstensen | **`carstens-en`** | 4.5 | `carstens` |
|
| 493 |
+
| bewundern | **`be-wundern`** | 4.5 | `wundern` |
|
| 494 |
+
| dornröschen | **`dornrös-ch-en`** | 3.0 | `dornrös` |
|
| 495 |
+
| überetscher | **`überets-ch-er`** | 3.0 | `überets` |
|
| 496 |
+
| betrieblich | **`be-triebli-ch`** | 3.0 | `triebli` |
|
| 497 |
+
| umgebungen | **`umgebu-ng-en`** | 3.0 | `umgebu` |
|
| 498 |
+
|
| 499 |
+
### 6.6 Linguistic Interpretation
|
| 500 |
+
|
| 501 |
+
> **Automated Insight:**
|
| 502 |
+
The language BAR appears to be more isolating or has a highly fixed vocabulary. Word-level models perform nearly as well as subword models, indicating fewer productive morphological processes.
|
| 503 |
+
|
| 504 |
+
---
|
| 505 |
+
## 7. Summary & Recommendations
|
| 506 |
|
| 507 |

|
| 508 |
|
|
|
|
| 510 |
|
| 511 |
| Component | Recommended | Rationale |
|
| 512 |
|-----------|-------------|-----------|
|
| 513 |
+
| Tokenizer | **64k BPE** | Best compression (4.00x) |
|
| 514 |
+
| N-gram | **2-gram** | Lowest perplexity (362) |
|
| 515 |
+
| Markov | **Context-4** | Highest predictability (97.8%) |
|
| 516 |
| Embeddings | **100d** | Balanced semantic capture and isotropy |
|
| 517 |
|
| 518 |
+
|
| 519 |
---
|
| 520 |
## Appendix: Metrics Glossary & Interpretation Guide
|
| 521 |
|
|
|
|
| 705 |
author = {Kamali, Omar},
|
| 706 |
title = {Wikilangs: Open NLP Models for Wikipedia Languages},
|
| 707 |
year = {2025},
|
| 708 |
+
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.18073153},
|
| 709 |
+
publisher = {Zenodo},
|
| 710 |
url = {https://huggingface.co/wikilangs}
|
| 711 |
institution = {Omneity Labs}
|
| 712 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 722 |
- 🤗 Models: [huggingface.co/wikilangs](https://huggingface.co/wikilangs)
|
| 723 |
- 📊 Data: [wikipedia-monthly](https://huggingface.co/datasets/omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly)
|
| 724 |
- 👤 Author: [Omar Kamali](https://huggingface.co/omarkamali)
|
| 725 |
+
- 🤝 Sponsor: [Featherless AI](https://featherless.ai)
|
| 726 |
---
|
| 727 |
*Generated by Wikilangs Models Pipeline*
|
| 728 |
|
| 729 |
+
*Report Date: 2026-01-03 06:42:51*
|
models/embeddings/monolingual/bar_128d.bin
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:6256ddf046563a10ad0e96ef58deffac4839b1eb48bc65facd0dd74ba05e830b
|
| 3 |
+
size 1115788582
|
models/embeddings/monolingual/bar_128d_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -3,11 +3,13 @@
|
|
| 3 |
"dimension": 128,
|
| 4 |
"version": "monolingual",
|
| 5 |
"training_params": {
|
| 6 |
-
"
|
| 7 |
"min_count": 5,
|
| 8 |
"window": 5,
|
| 9 |
"negative": 5,
|
| 10 |
-
"epochs": 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
},
|
| 12 |
-
"vocab_size":
|
| 13 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
"dimension": 128,
|
| 4 |
"version": "monolingual",
|
| 5 |
"training_params": {
|
| 6 |
+
"algorithm": "skipgram",
|
| 7 |
"min_count": 5,
|
| 8 |
"window": 5,
|
| 9 |
"negative": 5,
|
| 10 |
+
"epochs": 5,
|
| 11 |
+
"encoding_method": "rope",
|
| 12 |
+
"dim": 128
|
| 13 |
},
|
| 14 |
+
"vocab_size": 88124
|
| 15 |
}
|
models/embeddings/monolingual/bar_32d.bin
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:cc7a6c48e154f63a623a8376127a01b222af8bf2a04aba41f602a929eb6c27af
|
| 3 |
+
size 280109350
|
models/embeddings/monolingual/bar_32d_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -3,11 +3,13 @@
|
|
| 3 |
"dimension": 32,
|
| 4 |
"version": "monolingual",
|
| 5 |
"training_params": {
|
| 6 |
-
"
|
| 7 |
"min_count": 5,
|
| 8 |
"window": 5,
|
| 9 |
"negative": 5,
|
| 10 |
-
"epochs": 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
},
|
| 12 |
-
"vocab_size":
|
| 13 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
"dimension": 32,
|
| 4 |
"version": "monolingual",
|
| 5 |
"training_params": {
|
| 6 |
+
"algorithm": "skipgram",
|
| 7 |
"min_count": 5,
|
| 8 |
"window": 5,
|
| 9 |
"negative": 5,
|
| 10 |
+
"epochs": 5,
|
| 11 |
+
"encoding_method": "rope",
|
| 12 |
+
"dim": 32
|
| 13 |
},
|
| 14 |
+
"vocab_size": 88124
|
| 15 |
}
|
models/embeddings/monolingual/bar_64d.bin
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:9998545a04e63264d36cca0eb51c1e069804e9cdba44f02039cd26cd05531df8
|
| 3 |
+
size 558669094
|
models/embeddings/monolingual/bar_64d_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -3,11 +3,13 @@
|
|
| 3 |
"dimension": 64,
|
| 4 |
"version": "monolingual",
|
| 5 |
"training_params": {
|
| 6 |
-
"
|
| 7 |
"min_count": 5,
|
| 8 |
"window": 5,
|
| 9 |
"negative": 5,
|
| 10 |
-
"epochs": 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
},
|
| 12 |
-
"vocab_size":
|
| 13 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
"dimension": 64,
|
| 4 |
"version": "monolingual",
|
| 5 |
"training_params": {
|
| 6 |
+
"algorithm": "skipgram",
|
| 7 |
"min_count": 5,
|
| 8 |
"window": 5,
|
| 9 |
"negative": 5,
|
| 10 |
+
"epochs": 5,
|
| 11 |
+
"encoding_method": "rope",
|
| 12 |
+
"dim": 64
|
| 13 |
},
|
| 14 |
+
"vocab_size": 88124
|
| 15 |
}
|
models/subword_markov/bar_markov_ctx1_subword.parquet
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:60e6c3a72c3c4d893f6ddf06c56e1234d3475b1b1443e819143470ab5f1b4e23
|
| 3 |
+
size 182402
|
models/subword_markov/bar_markov_ctx1_subword_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
|
|
| 2 |
"context_size": 1,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "subword",
|
| 4 |
"language": "bar",
|
| 5 |
-
"unique_contexts":
|
| 6 |
-
"total_transitions":
|
| 7 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
"context_size": 1,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "subword",
|
| 4 |
"language": "bar",
|
| 5 |
+
"unique_contexts": 3388,
|
| 6 |
+
"total_transitions": 36898936
|
| 7 |
}
|
models/subword_markov/bar_markov_ctx2_subword.parquet
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:dc48393a4abf97a7708eb8626bb77b238a51c44b6bba67b7e1d4fd0bd11ec189
|
| 3 |
+
size 1029228
|
models/subword_markov/bar_markov_ctx2_subword_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
|
|
| 2 |
"context_size": 2,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "subword",
|
| 4 |
"language": "bar",
|
| 5 |
-
"unique_contexts":
|
| 6 |
-
"total_transitions":
|
| 7 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
"context_size": 2,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "subword",
|
| 4 |
"language": "bar",
|
| 5 |
+
"unique_contexts": 22382,
|
| 6 |
+
"total_transitions": 36872004
|
| 7 |
}
|
models/subword_markov/bar_markov_ctx3_subword.parquet
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:2791996798e11cff4740288bb4e88ef150e9193843760570285c334a6ad21342
|
| 3 |
+
size 4585569
|
models/subword_markov/bar_markov_ctx3_subword_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
|
|
| 2 |
"context_size": 3,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "subword",
|
| 4 |
"language": "bar",
|
| 5 |
-
"unique_contexts":
|
| 6 |
-
"total_transitions":
|
| 7 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
"context_size": 3,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "subword",
|
| 4 |
"language": "bar",
|
| 5 |
+
"unique_contexts": 130801,
|
| 6 |
+
"total_transitions": 36845072
|
| 7 |
}
|
models/subword_markov/bar_markov_ctx4_subword.parquet
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:19edd5d2767e201a87efc206fec70368c6dc23b8ed658bbf39f26635b1f373d3
|
| 3 |
+
size 15789022
|
models/subword_markov/bar_markov_ctx4_subword_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
|
|
| 2 |
"context_size": 4,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "subword",
|
| 4 |
"language": "bar",
|
| 5 |
-
"unique_contexts":
|
| 6 |
-
"total_transitions":
|
| 7 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
"context_size": 4,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "subword",
|
| 4 |
"language": "bar",
|
| 5 |
+
"unique_contexts": 610360,
|
| 6 |
+
"total_transitions": 36818140
|
| 7 |
}
|
models/subword_ngram/bar_2gram_subword.parquet
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:9e38e7d14a00c23438ba07cef06a0be700a6eaea54c9aa917c3319ce7eba165f
|
| 3 |
+
size 102154
|
models/subword_ngram/bar_2gram_subword_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
|
|
| 2 |
"n": 2,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "subword",
|
| 4 |
"language": "bar",
|
| 5 |
-
"unique_ngrams":
|
| 6 |
-
"total_ngrams":
|
| 7 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
"n": 2,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "subword",
|
| 4 |
"language": "bar",
|
| 5 |
+
"unique_ngrams": 7805,
|
| 6 |
+
"total_ngrams": 36898936
|
| 7 |
}
|
models/subword_ngram/bar_3gram_subword.parquet
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:ff09d3ef6e1cfa552449a8dedd31d9754c60b8a91db7126c3cc9c4c71957830a
|
| 3 |
+
size 780954
|
models/subword_ngram/bar_3gram_subword_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
|
|
| 2 |
"n": 3,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "subword",
|
| 4 |
"language": "bar",
|
| 5 |
-
"unique_ngrams":
|
| 6 |
-
"total_ngrams":
|
| 7 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
"n": 3,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "subword",
|
| 4 |
"language": "bar",
|
| 5 |
+
"unique_ngrams": 63080,
|
| 6 |
+
"total_ngrams": 36872004
|
| 7 |
}
|
models/subword_ngram/bar_4gram_subword.parquet
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:72f067181a08a87d97a0065d3a1bdaeb78404363053efae74d287fdc5e58187b
|
| 3 |
+
size 4090739
|
models/subword_ngram/bar_4gram_subword_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
|
|
| 2 |
"n": 4,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "subword",
|
| 4 |
"language": "bar",
|
| 5 |
-
"unique_ngrams":
|
| 6 |
-
"total_ngrams":
|
| 7 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
"n": 4,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "subword",
|
| 4 |
"language": "bar",
|
| 5 |
+
"unique_ngrams": 363810,
|
| 6 |
+
"total_ngrams": 36845072
|
| 7 |
}
|
models/tokenizer/bar_tokenizer_16k.model
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:70ddb2da3b8a1d35b41491bf8a0ea06f6e0357f42e81f619258dafcbc3567d87
|
| 3 |
+
size 500516
|
models/tokenizer/bar_tokenizer_16k.vocab
CHANGED
|
The diff for this file is too large to render.
See raw diff
|
|
|
models/tokenizer/bar_tokenizer_32k.model
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:f7c6a1964c1d0a5e0f3f657f5fe39d0fc4524fef607b13be5a9d6be1c48e71b2
|
| 3 |
+
size 773157
|
models/tokenizer/bar_tokenizer_32k.vocab
CHANGED
|
The diff for this file is too large to render.
See raw diff
|
|
|
models/tokenizer/bar_tokenizer_64k.model
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:0a6c179e6feecfed4b2ee3d6bb1547e591a0fdece5e1f9b05bc8dc198ae6ac1b
|
| 3 |
+
size 1335748
|
models/tokenizer/bar_tokenizer_64k.vocab
CHANGED
|
The diff for this file is too large to render.
See raw diff
|
|
|
models/tokenizer/bar_tokenizer_8k.model
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:77089651ccfa512d13316ef10f75bd2ec3ead99b2fce243a47c46f50b404db47
|
| 3 |
+
size 368818
|
models/tokenizer/bar_tokenizer_8k.vocab
CHANGED
|
The diff for this file is too large to render.
See raw diff
|
|
|
models/vocabulary/bar_vocabulary.parquet
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:d7edcd6cf37858bad1ad7f0f51a2247a6bb728fc9c8b48ffb32bfd46cfe4ee3f
|
| 3 |
+
size 3431123
|
models/vocabulary/bar_vocabulary_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,16 +1,17 @@
|
|
| 1 |
{
|
| 2 |
"language": "bar",
|
| 3 |
-
"vocabulary_size":
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
"statistics": {
|
| 5 |
-
"type_token_ratio": 0.
|
| 6 |
"coverage": {
|
| 7 |
-
"top_100": 0.
|
| 8 |
-
"top_1000": 0.
|
| 9 |
-
"top_5000": 0.
|
| 10 |
-
"top_10000": 0.
|
| 11 |
},
|
| 12 |
-
"hapax_count":
|
| 13 |
-
"hapax_ratio": 0.
|
| 14 |
-
"total_documents":
|
| 15 |
}
|
| 16 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
{
|
| 2 |
"language": "bar",
|
| 3 |
+
"vocabulary_size": 213465,
|
| 4 |
+
"variant": "full",
|
| 5 |
"statistics": {
|
| 6 |
+
"type_token_ratio": 0.0995109201675251,
|
| 7 |
"coverage": {
|
| 8 |
+
"top_100": 0.3198175845558876,
|
| 9 |
+
"top_1000": 0.5158986689356716,
|
| 10 |
+
"top_5000": 0.6559721791165527,
|
| 11 |
+
"top_10000": 0.7190383696641477
|
| 12 |
},
|
| 13 |
+
"hapax_count": 357256,
|
| 14 |
+
"hapax_ratio": 0.6259731112049496,
|
| 15 |
+
"total_documents": 26932
|
| 16 |
}
|
| 17 |
}
|
models/word_markov/bar_markov_ctx1_word.parquet
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:51608c66d7996b04b88bec1cf78dd596b044f1df0c12652fcb092ce187c00456
|
| 3 |
+
size 29383606
|
models/word_markov/bar_markov_ctx1_word_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
|
|
| 2 |
"context_size": 1,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "word",
|
| 4 |
"language": "bar",
|
| 5 |
-
"unique_contexts":
|
| 6 |
-
"total_transitions":
|
| 7 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
"context_size": 1,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "word",
|
| 4 |
"language": "bar",
|
| 5 |
+
"unique_contexts": 569846,
|
| 6 |
+
"total_transitions": 5708328
|
| 7 |
}
|
models/word_markov/bar_markov_ctx2_word.parquet
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:7fa0c4b83dfa569be9152f9aa90cd11f1e0d964b9f72a6e43fd8f8c02a1c4229
|
| 3 |
+
size 62105262
|
models/word_markov/bar_markov_ctx2_word_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
|
|
| 2 |
"context_size": 2,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "word",
|
| 4 |
"language": "bar",
|
| 5 |
-
"unique_contexts":
|
| 6 |
-
"total_transitions":
|
| 7 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
"context_size": 2,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "word",
|
| 4 |
"language": "bar",
|
| 5 |
+
"unique_contexts": 2948968,
|
| 6 |
+
"total_transitions": 5681396
|
| 7 |
}
|
models/word_markov/bar_markov_ctx3_word.parquet
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:563c3760b53559738c956fa71ade32f9ab51d036d6cbaf2f0eb9276d18a64547
|
| 3 |
+
size 82156156
|
models/word_markov/bar_markov_ctx3_word_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
|
|
| 2 |
"context_size": 3,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "word",
|
| 4 |
"language": "bar",
|
| 5 |
-
"unique_contexts":
|
| 6 |
-
"total_transitions":
|
| 7 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
"context_size": 3,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "word",
|
| 4 |
"language": "bar",
|
| 5 |
+
"unique_contexts": 4475523,
|
| 6 |
+
"total_transitions": 5654464
|
| 7 |
}
|
models/word_markov/bar_markov_ctx4_word.parquet
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:c30b22ec78b8b8678b0b13acf2ffae3de2029fda73f5076c124066a8dc0af5c9
|
| 3 |
+
size 93499333
|
models/word_markov/bar_markov_ctx4_word_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
|
|
| 2 |
"context_size": 4,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "word",
|
| 4 |
"language": "bar",
|
| 5 |
-
"unique_contexts":
|
| 6 |
-
"total_transitions":
|
| 7 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
"context_size": 4,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "word",
|
| 4 |
"language": "bar",
|
| 5 |
+
"unique_contexts": 4973907,
|
| 6 |
+
"total_transitions": 5627532
|
| 7 |
}
|
models/word_ngram/bar_2gram_word.parquet
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:d9d1fd00d794d3cbcff9b6abaf96b0600f5711bb2e3767de57949c3b54808ba8
|
| 3 |
+
size 1517204
|
models/word_ngram/bar_2gram_word_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
|
|
| 2 |
"n": 2,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "word",
|
| 4 |
"language": "bar",
|
| 5 |
-
"unique_ngrams":
|
| 6 |
-
"total_ngrams":
|
| 7 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
"n": 2,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "word",
|
| 4 |
"language": "bar",
|
| 5 |
+
"unique_ngrams": 110635,
|
| 6 |
+
"total_ngrams": 5708328
|
| 7 |
}
|
models/word_ngram/bar_3gram_word.parquet
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:ddf18025f58d5d74e756ca438583de919245a4a89dafdf1e1698d3c0ad41d5da
|
| 3 |
+
size 1935462
|
models/word_ngram/bar_3gram_word_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
|
|
| 2 |
"n": 3,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "word",
|
| 4 |
"language": "bar",
|
| 5 |
-
"unique_ngrams":
|
| 6 |
-
"total_ngrams":
|
| 7 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
"n": 3,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "word",
|
| 4 |
"language": "bar",
|
| 5 |
+
"unique_ngrams": 129534,
|
| 6 |
+
"total_ngrams": 5681396
|
| 7 |
}
|
models/word_ngram/bar_4gram_word.parquet
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:4c7b231b1b6bf00b737f2acedc276944c25abba63ec6d096669529bb9951ec97
|
| 3 |
+
size 3042682
|
models/word_ngram/bar_4gram_word_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
|
|
| 2 |
"n": 4,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "word",
|
| 4 |
"language": "bar",
|
| 5 |
-
"unique_ngrams":
|
| 6 |
-
"total_ngrams":
|
| 7 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
"n": 4,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "word",
|
| 4 |
"language": "bar",
|
| 5 |
+
"unique_ngrams": 187348,
|
| 6 |
+
"total_ngrams": 5654464
|
| 7 |
}
|
visualizations/embedding_isotropy.png
CHANGED
|
|
visualizations/embedding_norms.png
CHANGED
|
|
visualizations/embedding_similarity.png
CHANGED
|
Git LFS Details
|
|
Git LFS Details
|
visualizations/markov_branching.png
CHANGED
|
|
visualizations/markov_contexts.png
CHANGED
|
|