SentenceTransformer based on Alibaba-NLP/gte-multilingual-base
This is a sentence-transformers model finetuned from Alibaba-NLP/gte-multilingual-base on the offshore_energy_v1 dataset. It maps sentences & paragraphs to a 768-dimensional dense vector space and can be used for semantic textual similarity, semantic search, paraphrase mining, text classification, clustering, and more.
Model Details
Model Description
- Model Type: Sentence Transformer
- Base model: Alibaba-NLP/gte-multilingual-base
- Maximum Sequence Length: 8192 tokens
- Output Dimensionality: 768 dimensions
- Similarity Function: Cosine Similarity
- Training Dataset:
Model Sources
Full Model Architecture
SentenceTransformer(
(0): Transformer({'max_seq_length': 8192, 'do_lower_case': False, 'architecture': 'NewModel'})
(1): Pooling({'word_embedding_dimension': 768, 'pooling_mode_cls_token': True, 'pooling_mode_mean_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_max_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_mean_sqrt_len_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_weightedmean_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_lasttoken': False, 'include_prompt': True})
(2): Normalize()
)
Usage
Direct Usage (Sentence Transformers)
First install the Sentence Transformers library:
pip install -U sentence-transformers
Then you can load this model and run inference.
from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer
model = SentenceTransformer("Sampath1987/EnergyEmbed-nv1")
sentences = [
'How does the predictive reservoir effectiveness model aid in the exploration of the Winduck Interval?',
'The latest Silurian to Early Devonian Winduck Interval of the extensive but poorly exposed Neckarboo Sub-basin, consists of several thousands of metres of a quartzose siliciclastic sandstone succession that has been divided into three sequence divisions called (in ascending parasequence order) parasequence A (coarse-grained quartz sandstone), parasequence B (fining-upward succession of sandstone with siltstone and sandstone beds thicken upward) and parasequence C (coarse-grained quartz sandstone with siltstone and interbedded calcareous sandstones). These three geophysically defined parasequences are separated by slightly discordant erosion surfaces. The erosion surfaces are characterised by abrupt breaks at the top of parasequences A and B and the surface at the top of parasequence B represents relatively local erosion. The top of parasequence C is marked by a major unconformity with the Snake Cave Interval. Gamma ray and self-potential signatures within the parasequences can be correlated throughout the Neckarboo Sub-basin. The three sequence divisions are further subdivided into depositional parasequences, which are readily recognised from core sedimentology and electrofacies analysis. The parasequences provide the framework for a detailed sedimentological analysis, which focuses on the identification of lithofacies successions and parasequences. Petrophysical data are recorded and their relationships to the depositional parasequences are discussed. This paper presents a predictive reservoir effectiveness model that has been developed to aid exploration of the Winduck Interval. The aim is to find the distribution of parasequences (based on variations in porosity, net effective thickness and lithofacies with burial depth) and to provide a dataset for lithostratigraphic units within the Winduck Interval and parameter input for exploration prospect evaluation. Parasequence stratigraphic analyses were obtained where there is good lithofacies control. The porosity and permeability results have been analyzed in a number of parasequences and poor reservoir quality may be due to the effects of structure and fluid flow. This approach provides for better and more precise stratigraphic trap analysis.',
'In this multi-Tcf subsea gas development off the North West coast of Australia, reservoir simulation supports the key business decisions and processes. An important factor when providing production forecasts is ensuring that a range of possible outcomes (low-mid-high) are captured accurately by the models. The output from these models may then be used by decision makers for evaluating different developments and scenarios. The design of experiments (DoE) is commonly employed to aid the evaluation of subsurface uncertainties and characterise the impact and influence to key model outcomes supporting development decisions.\nField production performance is often driven by uncertainty in reservoir outcome. This paper is helpful to practitioners involved in any computer modelling of petroleum reservoirs who are interested in capturing the uncertainty inherent in a field and building an appropriate workflow for the development and sensitivity of a range of models. Both model building and using DoE to evaluate developments and Value of Information (VoI) studies for reservoir management will be shared. Integrated DoE focusing on static, dynamic and well-based uncertainties will be illustrated.\nResults will cover:\n–\nLessons learned and best practices using ED (Experimental Design) to generate low-mid-high reservoir simulation models\n–\nUnderstanding reservoir and well based uncertainties separately\n–\nEvaluating incremental field developments using ED\n–\nUtilizing ED to anticipate range of surveillance responses\nFew papers exist on the integrated application of ED to giant gas fields using reservoir simulation. Firstly, this case study will highlight some pitfalls to avoid during the workflow. Secondly, the authors will discuss the important issue of how to integrate or separate static, dynamic, well and facility based uncertainties. Thirdly, the work will show the unique application of ED in VoI and field development scoping.',
]
embeddings = model.encode(sentences)
print(embeddings.shape)
similarities = model.similarity(embeddings, embeddings)
print(similarities)
Evaluation
Metrics
Triplet
| Metric |
Value |
| cosine_accuracy |
0.98 |
Training Details
Training Dataset
offshore_energy_v1
Evaluation Dataset
offshore_energy_v1
Training Hyperparameters
Non-Default Hyperparameters
eval_strategy: steps
per_device_train_batch_size: 16
per_device_eval_batch_size: 16
learning_rate: 2e-05
num_train_epochs: 1
warmup_ratio: 0.1
All Hyperparameters
Click to expand
overwrite_output_dir: False
do_predict: False
eval_strategy: steps
prediction_loss_only: True
per_device_train_batch_size: 16
per_device_eval_batch_size: 16
per_gpu_train_batch_size: None
per_gpu_eval_batch_size: None
gradient_accumulation_steps: 1
eval_accumulation_steps: None
torch_empty_cache_steps: None
learning_rate: 2e-05
weight_decay: 0.0
adam_beta1: 0.9
adam_beta2: 0.999
adam_epsilon: 1e-08
max_grad_norm: 1.0
num_train_epochs: 1
max_steps: -1
lr_scheduler_type: linear
lr_scheduler_kwargs: {}
warmup_ratio: 0.1
warmup_steps: 0
log_level: passive
log_level_replica: warning
log_on_each_node: True
logging_nan_inf_filter: True
save_safetensors: True
save_on_each_node: False
save_only_model: False
restore_callback_states_from_checkpoint: False
no_cuda: False
use_cpu: False
use_mps_device: False
seed: 42
data_seed: None
jit_mode_eval: False
use_ipex: False
bf16: False
fp16: False
fp16_opt_level: O1
half_precision_backend: auto
bf16_full_eval: False
fp16_full_eval: False
tf32: None
local_rank: 0
ddp_backend: None
tpu_num_cores: None
tpu_metrics_debug: False
debug: []
dataloader_drop_last: False
dataloader_num_workers: 0
dataloader_prefetch_factor: None
past_index: -1
disable_tqdm: False
remove_unused_columns: True
label_names: None
load_best_model_at_end: False
ignore_data_skip: False
fsdp: []
fsdp_min_num_params: 0
fsdp_config: {'min_num_params': 0, 'xla': False, 'xla_fsdp_v2': False, 'xla_fsdp_grad_ckpt': False}
fsdp_transformer_layer_cls_to_wrap: None
accelerator_config: {'split_batches': False, 'dispatch_batches': None, 'even_batches': True, 'use_seedable_sampler': True, 'non_blocking': False, 'gradient_accumulation_kwargs': None}
deepspeed: None
label_smoothing_factor: 0.0
optim: adamw_torch
optim_args: None
adafactor: False
group_by_length: False
length_column_name: length
ddp_find_unused_parameters: None
ddp_bucket_cap_mb: None
ddp_broadcast_buffers: False
dataloader_pin_memory: True
dataloader_persistent_workers: False
skip_memory_metrics: True
use_legacy_prediction_loop: False
push_to_hub: False
resume_from_checkpoint: None
hub_model_id: None
hub_strategy: every_save
hub_private_repo: None
hub_always_push: False
hub_revision: None
gradient_checkpointing: False
gradient_checkpointing_kwargs: None
include_inputs_for_metrics: False
include_for_metrics: []
eval_do_concat_batches: True
fp16_backend: auto
push_to_hub_model_id: None
push_to_hub_organization: None
mp_parameters:
auto_find_batch_size: False
full_determinism: False
torchdynamo: None
ray_scope: last
ddp_timeout: 1800
torch_compile: False
torch_compile_backend: None
torch_compile_mode: None
include_tokens_per_second: False
include_num_input_tokens_seen: False
neftune_noise_alpha: None
optim_target_modules: None
batch_eval_metrics: False
eval_on_start: False
use_liger_kernel: False
liger_kernel_config: None
eval_use_gather_object: False
average_tokens_across_devices: False
prompts: None
batch_sampler: batch_sampler
multi_dataset_batch_sampler: proportional
router_mapping: {}
learning_rate_mapping: {}
Training Logs
| Epoch |
Step |
Validation Loss |
ai-job-validation_cosine_accuracy |
| 0.3568 |
1000 |
0.0982 |
0.9764 |
| 0.7135 |
2000 |
0.0870 |
0.9800 |
Framework Versions
- Python: 3.10.12
- Sentence Transformers: 5.1.0
- Transformers: 4.53.3
- PyTorch: 2.8.0+cu128
- Accelerate: 1.9.0
- Datasets: 4.0.0
- Tokenizers: 0.21.2
Citation
BibTeX
Sentence Transformers
@inproceedings{reimers-2019-sentence-bert,
title = "Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks",
author = "Reimers, Nils and Gurevych, Iryna",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing",
month = "11",
year = "2019",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.10084",
}
MultipleNegativesRankingLoss
@misc{henderson2017efficient,
title={Efficient Natural Language Response Suggestion for Smart Reply},
author={Matthew Henderson and Rami Al-Rfou and Brian Strope and Yun-hsuan Sung and Laszlo Lukacs and Ruiqi Guo and Sanjiv Kumar and Balint Miklos and Ray Kurzweil},
year={2017},
eprint={1705.00652},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.CL}
}