Hugging Face's logo

Datasets:
AIcell
/
paper-laundary-test

Dataset card Files
xet
 Community
paper-laundary-test / rewrite_experiments_MANIFEST.md
AIcell's picture
AIcell
Upload rewrite_experiments_MANIFEST.md with huggingface_hub
0c552e6 verified
preview code
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
2.99 kB

Agentic Rewrite Experiments — Package Manifest

Two ICLR-2026 paper-laundry rewrite experiments over the 120-paper anonymized set, each with two rewrite models, then AI-scored by GPT-5.5 + Sonnet 5.

Experiments

  • agentic_rewrite_combo: one combined 6-dimension positive rewrite prompt, 3 sequential rounds. Final artifact = round_03.
  • agentic_rewrite_review: rewrite → intermediate review (gpt-5.5 on bedrock-mantle) → review-guided rewrite, 2 rounds. Final artifact = round_02.

Rewrite models: opus (us.anthropic.claude-opus-4-8, Claude Code on Bedrock) and gpt55 (openai.gpt-5.5, codex on bedrock-mantle).

Contents 

agentic_rewrite_combo/result_opus/    combo, opus rewrites
agentic_rewrite_combo/result_gpt55/   combo, gpt-5.5 rewrites
agentic_rewrite_review/result_opus/   review, opus rewrites
agentic_rewrite_review/result_gpt55/  review, gpt-5.5 rewrites
  each result_<model>/ has:
    pdfs/<variant>/<arxiv_id>/round_XX/<...>.pdf        compiled PDF per round
    source/<variant>/<arxiv_id>/round_XX/<...>_modified.zip  rewritten LaTeX source per round
    (+ per-round rewrite/compile logs, _batch_logs/ per-paper driver logs)

laundried_papers/rewrite_review_results/   final-round PDF scores
  <experiment>/<rewrite_model>/<scorer>/reviews.jsonl   one review per paper
  _analysis/summary.csv, summary.txt                    aggregate tables

Scorers: gpt55 = openai.gpt-5.5, sonnet5 = us.anthropic.claude-sonnet-5. Review prompt: standard. Numeric fields validated to the shared ICLR schema.

Completion / known gaps

Rewrite PDFs (final round): 478/480.

  • combo/opus 119/120 — missing 2603.12372v1 (protected-content drift dead-end, MAX_RETRY=5 exhausted).
  • review/gpt55 119/120 — missing 2512.01047v2 (drift dead-end on \toolname{} macro).

Scores: 953/956.

  • The 3 gaps are all paper 2505.11790v4 ("JULI: Jailbreak LLMs...") scored by Sonnet 5, which its safety classifier permanently refuses (empty content). GPT-5.5 scored this paper fine. Same behavior as the prior 3000-PDF review grid.

Headline results (mean model_rating; gap = rating − human)

experiment rewrite GPT-5.5 Sonnet5 GPT-5.5 gap Sonnet5 gap
combo opus 5.63 5.35 +0.87 +0.58
combo gpt55 5.33 5.12 +0.54 +0.34
review opus 5.76 5.44 +0.98 +0.65
review gpt55 5.32 5.09 +0.54 +0.31
  • opus rewrites score ~0.3–0.45 higher than gpt-5.5 rewrites everywhere.
  • review experiment (feedback-guided) > combo; review/opus is highest.
  • Sonnet 5 is consistently ~0.2–0.3 stricter than GPT-5.5.
  • Baseline reference (prior grid, standard prompt): sonnet5 5.20, gpt55 5.38.

NOT included

gpt-5-mini × 3-prompt (standard/strict/persistent) scoring was requested but not run: this host has no OpenAI key and bedrock-mantle exposes only gpt-5.5 (no gpt-5-mini/nano variant — all 404). Needs an OpenAI API key.