| # Agentic Rewrite Experiments — Package Manifest |
|
|
| Two ICLR-2026 paper-laundry rewrite experiments over the 120-paper anonymized |
| set, each with two rewrite models, then AI-scored by GPT-5.5 + Sonnet 5. |
|
|
| ## Experiments |
|
|
| - **agentic_rewrite_combo**: one combined 6-dimension positive rewrite prompt, |
| 3 sequential rounds. Final artifact = `round_03`. |
| - **agentic_rewrite_review**: rewrite → intermediate review (gpt-5.5 on |
| bedrock-mantle) → review-guided rewrite, 2 rounds. Final artifact = `round_02`. |
|
|
| Rewrite models: **opus** (`us.anthropic.claude-opus-4-8`, Claude Code on Bedrock) |
| and **gpt55** (`openai.gpt-5.5`, codex on bedrock-mantle). |
|
|
| ## Contents |
|
|
| ``` |
| agentic_rewrite_combo/result_opus/ combo, opus rewrites |
| agentic_rewrite_combo/result_gpt55/ combo, gpt-5.5 rewrites |
| agentic_rewrite_review/result_opus/ review, opus rewrites |
| agentic_rewrite_review/result_gpt55/ review, gpt-5.5 rewrites |
| each result_<model>/ has: |
| pdfs/<variant>/<arxiv_id>/round_XX/<...>.pdf compiled PDF per round |
| source/<variant>/<arxiv_id>/round_XX/<...>_modified.zip rewritten LaTeX source per round |
| (+ per-round rewrite/compile logs, _batch_logs/ per-paper driver logs) |
| |
| laundried_papers/rewrite_review_results/ final-round PDF scores |
| <experiment>/<rewrite_model>/<scorer>/reviews.jsonl one review per paper |
| _analysis/summary.csv, summary.txt aggregate tables |
| ``` |
|
|
| Scorers: `gpt55` = openai.gpt-5.5, `sonnet5` = us.anthropic.claude-sonnet-5. |
| Review prompt: `standard`. Numeric fields validated to the shared ICLR schema. |
|
|
| ## Completion / known gaps |
|
|
| Rewrite PDFs (final round): 478/480. |
| - combo/opus 119/120 — missing `2603.12372v1` (protected-content drift dead-end, |
| MAX_RETRY=5 exhausted). |
| - review/gpt55 119/120 — missing `2512.01047v2` (drift dead-end on `\toolname{}` macro). |
| |
| Scores: 953/956. |
| - The 3 gaps are all paper `2505.11790v4` ("JULI: Jailbreak LLMs...") scored by |
| **Sonnet 5**, which its safety classifier permanently refuses (empty content). |
| GPT-5.5 scored this paper fine. Same behavior as the prior 3000-PDF review grid. |
| |
| ## Headline results (mean model_rating; gap = rating − human) |
|
|
| | experiment | rewrite | GPT-5.5 | Sonnet5 | GPT-5.5 gap | Sonnet5 gap | |
| |---|---|---|---|---|---| |
| | combo | opus | 5.63 | 5.35 | +0.87 | +0.58 | |
| | combo | gpt55 | 5.33 | 5.12 | +0.54 | +0.34 | |
| | review | opus | 5.76 | 5.44 | +0.98 | +0.65 | |
| | review | gpt55 | 5.32 | 5.09 | +0.54 | +0.31 | |
|
|
| - opus rewrites score ~0.3–0.45 higher than gpt-5.5 rewrites everywhere. |
| - review experiment (feedback-guided) > combo; review/opus is highest. |
| - Sonnet 5 is consistently ~0.2–0.3 stricter than GPT-5.5. |
| - Baseline reference (prior grid, standard prompt): sonnet5 5.20, gpt55 5.38. |
|
|
| ## NOT included |
|
|
| gpt-5-mini × 3-prompt (standard/strict/persistent) scoring was requested but |
| **not run**: this host has no OpenAI key and bedrock-mantle exposes only |
| `gpt-5.5` (no gpt-5-mini/nano variant — all 404). Needs an OpenAI API key. |
|
|
