text
large_stringlengths
384
2.05k
rank_avg
float64
1
4.19k
rank_max
float64
1
8.21k
rank_min
float64
1
5.03k
rank_median
float64
1
4.21k
rank_by_avgsim
float64
1
4.19k
avgsim_to_github
float32
0.77
0.85
dataset
large_stringclasses
1 value
mbda_z \\ \delta\end{smallmatrix}\right)} \}. \end{aligned}$$ After choosing a basis of the lattice $\Lambda^*_{G_{\operatorname{ss}}}$ we arrive at the asserted formula (with $s' = \dim T_{G_{\operatorname{ss}}}$ and $u = t + r_H$). We stress that the proof of is constructive: The maps $\mathcal A$ and $\mathcal B$...
701
402
965
714
2,869
0.77643
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
4.90 1118.00 37.21 80.63 50.92 283.50 **MGoF** 13.97 17.50 15.54 294.08 14.66 8.13 10.45 **8.01** **12.50** 3.13 5.00 250.10 18.42 8.75 11.86 **7.55** -------------------- --...
702
2,380
2,043
832
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
y $\mathcal{U}$ imposed on it, then Eq. **(\[Eqn: TB\]) must also be satisfied in order that the topology generated by $_{\textrm{T}}\mathcal{B}$ is indeed $\mathcal{U}$. The next theorem connects the two types of bases of Defs. A1.1 and A1.2 by asserting that although a local base of a space need not consist of open s...
703
1,842
1,042
712
2,143
0.782327
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
east one propagating part which contains $1$ and $1'$ simultaneously. In the diagram of the standard expression of a seat-plan of $\Sigma^1_{n-\frac{1}{2}}$, the vertices $1$ and $1'$ are joined by a vertical line. Shrinking this vertical line to one vertex, we have one to one correspondences between $\Sigma^1_{n-\frac...
704
1,016
660
661
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
also targets the virus through increasing the endosomal pH and hinders the glycosylation process of the cellular receptors of SARS-CoV-2, which eventually blocks the viral attachment to the ACE2 receptors and inhibits the viral infection. (4) Moreover, the hydroxychloroquine obstructs the MAP-kinase pathway which resul...
705
3,821
1,111
503
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
ght)}+\\ & \quad +P{\left(a_2=1,b_4=1\right)}+P{\left(a_2=2,b_8=0\right)}+P{\left(a_3=0,b_8=2\right)}+P{\left(a_3=1,b_7=1\right)}+\\ & \quad +P{\left(a_3=2,b_4=2\right)}+P{\left(a_4=0,b_1=1\right)}+P{\left(a_4=1,b_2=1\right)}+P{\left(a_4=2,b_3=2\right)}+\\ & \quad +P{\left(a_5=0,b_6=2\right)}+P{\left(a_5=1,b_2=0\right)...
706
1,246
1,393
866
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
for all $\beta \in R^\chi _{+\infty }$. The set $$V'=\{\chi '\in V^\chi _{\underline{n}}\,|\,d(\chi ')\not=0 \}$$ is open in $V^\chi _{\underline{n}}$ and contains $\chi $. Thus by Prop. \[pr:X5dense\] the set $$V''=\{\chi '\in {\overline{{\mathcal{X}}}}_5\cap V^\chi _{\underline{n}}\,| \,d(\chi ')\not=0\}$$ is Zari...
707
752
805
698
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
j_{\bar{z}}^g (z) \nonumber \\ & & + \frac{g}{4} \log |z-w|^2 (\partial_z j_{\bar{z}}^g(z) - \partial_{\bar z} j^g_z(z))) \nonumber \\ & & + (-1)^{ac} : j_z^c j_{\bar z}^a :(z) \nonumber \\ & & + ( {(A)^{ac}}_{gh} \frac{\bar z - \bar w}{z-w} :j^{g}_{\bar z} j^{h}_{\bar z}: (z) - ( {(B)^{ac}}_{gh} \log |z-w|^2 :j^{...
708
981
1,037
799
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
the pragmatics of $\mathcal{L}_{Q}^{P}$. We introduce the following assumption on $\mathcal{L}_{Q}^{P}$. A$_{5}$. *Let a mapping* $\xi $* be given which interpretes the variable* $x$* in the rfs of* $\mathcal{L}_{Q}^{P}$* on a physical object in the state* $S$*. A proof that the rf* $E(x)$* is true (false) consists i...
709
3,128
1,320
676
2,735
0.777407
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
\mathbf{y}_*}$ is strictly diagonal. Reference methods ----------------- The GPR point estimates are compared with a state-of-the-art kNN algorithm. We select ten predictors from the (transformed) data using a simulated annealing -based optimization approach of [@Packalen2012] and use the most similar neighbor (MSN) ...
710
198
305
776
1,332
0.790854
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
^+(x,y),L_x\}$ is very similar to that of Figure \[satolevine\]). This means that $\pi_1(M)$ does **not** admit an epimorphism to $\mathbb{Z}\ast \mathbb{Z}$ since that would imply that $\{ L_x,L_y\}$ were a homology boundary link. But $\b^2(x,y)=-1$ precludes this by [@C2]. Nonetheless, further $c(yy...y,x)$ may be ta...
711
190
807
742
3,163
0.774389
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
by Fourier-transform of the slow-time phase fluctuations of individual comb lines $\tilde{A}_\mu(t)$, as $\delta\!f_\mu(t) = \frac{d}{dt} \arg(\tilde{A}_\mu(t))$. As according to [@hendry_spontaneous_2018], the critical amplitude $F_C$ to which a soliton locks for this detuning ($\delta\omega>3\kappa$), based on pure...
712
1,391
2,631
943
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
In this section we will prove the following theorem. ### Main Theorem {#main-theorem .unnumbered} There exists an integer $l_0$ such that for an arbitrary integer $l \ge l_0$, $n=2^l-2$ the Kervaire invariant given by the formula (1) is trivial. $$$$ ### Proof of Main Theorem {#proof-of-main-theorem .unnumbered} T...
713
229
970
747
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
\end{aligned}$$ Where we use properties of $h$ from Lemma \[l:hproperties\]. The last claim follows immediately from Lemma \[l:hproperties\].4. [Defining q]{} \[ss:defining-q\] In this section, we define the function $q$ that is used in Lemma \[l:fproperties\]. Our construction is a slight modification to the ...
714
2,023
636
764
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
\prod_{k=1}^{i-1} \frac{(1-zT^k)}{(1-T^k)}. \label{F}$$ By the Cauchy $q$-binomial theorem the sum equals $$\frac{1}{(1-w)}\prod_{n\geq 1}\frac{(1-wzT^n)}{(1-wT^n)}.$$Also$$\sum_\lambda T^{|\lambda|}=\prod_{n\geq 1}(1-T^n)^{-1}.$$If we divide Formula (\[F\]) by this we finally get $$1-(1-z)(1-w)\prod_{n\geq 1}...
715
2,594
929
730
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
`gi 87162179 ref` `415` `AKSEVWRQMMSD` ...
716
5,343
311
224
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
and $\Phi$. Together, cases A and B show that $\prod\Theta \not= \prod\Phi$ implies $\Theta \not= \Phi$. Applying the contrapositive principle[^12] gives $\prod\Theta = \prod\Phi$ if $\Theta = \Phi$. \[T:SPACE\_UNIQ\_ENSEMBLE\] Any choice space has one unique generating ensemble: let $\Theta$ and $\Phi$ be two ensemb...
717
767
1,994
831
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
\pm)}(k,r) = \bar{N}_{2} \biggl( 1 \mp \displaystyle\frac{iW(r)}{k\alpha} \biggr) e^{\pm ikr} \label{eq.3.2.1.3}$$ and $$\bar{N}_{2} = i\displaystyle\frac{\bar{N}_{1}}{k\alpha N_{2}} \label{eq.3.2.1.4}$$ In accordance with main statements of quantum mechanics, for applying such form of the radia...
718
3,814
423
704
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
${abs}(|\mathcal{C}_{i1}| - |\mathcal{C}_{i2}|) \leq 1$ [@dong2005ensembles]. This has been shown empirically to have little effect on the accuracy in most cases, while reducing the time taken to train nested dichotomies. Balanced selection has greater benefits for problems with many classes. It is clear that the sam...
719
4,255
1,394
460
422
0.810185
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
s a unique strong solution $\Phi$ satisfying the initial and boundary values. Then $\phi(x,\omega,E):=\Phi(x,\omega,E_{\rm m}-E)$ is the solution of $(I+P_0)\phi=f$. This completes the proof of (\[inf4\]). The inequality (\[inf5\]) can be shown similarly as above and so the conclusion follows. \[md-gene\] The previous...
720
463
784
824
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
pha)=\alpha l$ induces a bijection between the set $$\{ \alpha \in [K^{x}\backslash L /Q]\ ; x\alpha y \in H\},$$ and the set $$\{w\in [K^{x}\backslash L\cap H^{x}/ Q^{l}]\}.$$ - Let $\alpha\in L$ such that $x\alpha y \in H$. Since $y=lx^{-1}h$ we have: $$\begin{aligned} x\alpha y \in H &\Leftrightarrow x\alpha ...
721
910
717
766
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
orse function is a Morse function such that the following hold ([@kitazawa]). 1. At distinct singular points the values are distinct. 2. Inverse images of regular values are disjoint unions of standard spheres. 3. A vertex of the Reeb graph such that the inverse image includes a singular point not giving a local ...
722
1,519
2,293
820
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
{} (232,30)[(b)]{} (395,30)[(c)]{} Target FBP Matérn --------------- ----- -------- -- -- -- Carved cheese 0.1 12604 : Computation times of the carved cheese (in seconds)[]{data-label="Computation time cheese"} Discussion ---------- We have presented x-ray tomography recons...
723
167
1,782
851
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
-\lambda(t-s)}\lrp{\frac{L_N^2}{\epsilon}\lrn{y_s - y_0}_2^2 + L \lrn{y_s - y_0}_2} ds - \int_0^t e^{-\lambda(t-s)} G_s dA_s. \end{aligned}$$ By taking derivatives, we see that $$\begin{aligned} d\mathcal{L}_t \leq& -\lambda f(z_t) dt + \lrp{\frac{L_N^2}{\epsilon}\lrn{y_t - y_0}_2^2 + L...
724
2,098
838
734
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
TNM (stage) Duration of follow-up after diagnosis (months) Site of metastasis Site of tomotherapy --------- ----- ----- -------------------- -------------------- ----------------------------------------- ------------- ------------------------------------------------ -------------------- --------------------...
725
5,141
355
337
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
es labeled by $A,B$ where $A,B\in\{T,\Phi,R\}$. They are defined by $$\begin{aligned} \mathbf{W}_{TT}^{(m\,h\,k)}&=\mathbf{W}^{(m\,h\,k)}\big|_{c_{\beta\neq 1}=0}\,, \\ {\nonumber}\mathbf{W}_{\Phi\Phi}^{(m\,h\,k)}&=\mathbf{W}^{(m\,h\,k)}\big|_{c_{\beta\neq 2}=0}\,, \\ {\nonumber}\mathbf{W}_{RR}^{(m\,h\,k)}&=\mathbf{W}...
726
2,811
937
785
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
loss of generality, we assume that $I_{n-k+1}$ corresponds to the first index (up to a permutation). We can rewrite ($\mathcal{P}_1$) (Proposition \[prop4\]) as: $\underset{(1,v) \in \mathcal{V}_{1,k}}{\underset{v \in \mathbb{R}^{n-1}}{\arg\min}} {\|v\|}_1 $ Constraints in ($\mathcal{P}_1$) can be moved to the follo...
727
2,955
1,002
709
3,464
0.772173
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
1$ and $$\label{eq:s13} H^a_{\rm eff}=H-i\lambda_W VV^\dag\,.$$ In this case the coupling is purely imaginary. For the two cases, where the antenna is terminated by a hard wall or an open reflecting end, we may assume $\alpha=0$, resulting in $\lambda_T=\tanh(i\varphi/2)=i\tan\varphi/2$, and $$\label{eq:s14} H^...
728
4,776
1,998
597
2,377
0.780411
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
------------- All 58 animals were continuously monitored over 6 months to exclude postoperative patellar luxations, deep wound infection, or empyema. ### Patellar luxation The animals were examined daily over the first 5 weeks and weekly for the remaining observation period by adspection for clinical signs of patell...
729
4,774
738
427
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
hedged and leveraged, and nearly free of systematic market fluctuations. Equations (\[439\])-(\[442\]) provide approximate expressions valid to first order in $1/N$ for the properties of these portfolios.*]{} 3. Single-Index Model with Constant Residual Variance {#single-index-model-with-constant-residual-variance .u...
730
1,125
1,459
803
3,063
0.775093
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
---C50 1.389 (7) P2---C63 1.835 (4) C49---H49 0.9500 P3---C57 1.820 (5) C50---H50 0.9500 P3---C51 1.831 (5) C51---C56 1.380 (7) P3---C63 1.836 (4) C51---C52 1.387 (7) P4---C39 1.823 (5) ...
731
5,388
650
230
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
(h, 1_G) j(1_H, g) = \theta \bigl( \psi(h, 1_G)\bigl) \theta \bigl(\varphi(1_H, g) \bigl) = \theta \bigl(\psi(h, 1_G) \varphi(1_H, g) \bigl)$$ that is $\theta$ is surjective. Thus $H\, {}_{\alpha}\!\! \bowtie_{\beta} \, G$ is a quotient group of $X$. We end the section with a problem that can be of interest for a furt...
732
3,690
1,018
617
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
lta R},\label{eq:radial_operator_uniform} \\ \Delta_\phi^2\Phi_{i,j,k} =& \frac{\Phi_{i,j-1,k}-2\Phi_{i,j,k}+\Phi_{i,j+1,k}}{R_i^2(\delta\phi)^2},\end{aligned}$$ while $\Delta_z^2$ is defined through Equation . Logarithmic Cylindrical Grid ---------------------------- In logarithmic cylindrical coordinates, we disc...
733
2,986
1,432
825
2,383
0.78034
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
\pmod{3k}$, $Y \cap (S \times \{n\}) = \{x_2, x_3\} \times \{n\}$.\ We will now prove Theorem \[kodd\]. We know that if $X \subset \mathbb{Z}_{k+1}^2$ has one point in each row or column then $X$ is a hole of size $k+1$. Since $k+1$ is even, we can try to choose $X_n$ in each slice $\mathbb{Z}_{k+1}^2 \times \{n\}$ s...
734
499
571
746
2,182
0.781955
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
2 0.8665 0.3064 0.031\* C12 0.6221 (2) 0.7741 (3) 0.35032 (18) 0.0191 (10) H12 0.6426 0.7594 0.3262 0.023\* C13 0.6964 (2) 0.5780 (3) 0.35824 (16) 0.0130 (9) H13A 0.7378 ...
735
4,329
438
438
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
,J,P). eq(A,A). plus(0,B,B). plus(s(A),B,s(C)):- plus(A,B,C). ![Moded SLD-tree $eq\_plus$[]{data-label="fig:eq_plus_symbolic"}](figs/eq_plus_symbolic.pdf){width="70ex"} Substitutions on input variables express conditions for the clause to be applicable. The edge from node $N_2$ to $N_3$ shows that clause ...
736
2,221
982
538
198
0.818866
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
ho_{n-1}|< r_n\}$ and $\sigma_{B_n} = \inf\{t>0: X_t\not\in B_n\}$. The algorithm comes to an end at the random index $N = \min\{n\geq 0\colon \rho_n\not\in D\}$, again using the standard understanding that $\min\emptyset \coloneqq \infty$. See for example the depiction in Figure \[4stepsonly\]. ![Steps of the walks-o...
737
2,287
906
783
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
0.000 0.000 BLB($n^{0.8}$) 0.002 0.000 0.000 0.004 0.002 0.000 0.000 SDB($n^{0.6}$) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 SDB($n^{0.8}$) 0.000 0.000 ...
738
5,097
192
426
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
0.40177 (12) 0.49661 (5) 0.0332 (3) P1 0.70165 (5) 0.64377 (8) 0.41615 (4) 0.0122 (2) P2 0.90214 (5) 0.37198 (8) 0.63471 (4) 0.0119 (2) P3 0.86722 (5) 0.16721 (8) 0.60311 (4) 0.0123 (2) P4 0.68282 (5) ...
739
4,559
232
407
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
covariant derivative can be expressed in terms of the spin connection $\omega_{an m}$ as $\nabla_a=\partial_a+{1\over 2} \omega_{anm} \Sigma^{nm}$, where $\Sigma^{nm}={1\over 4}[\gamma^n,\gamma^m]$ are the generators of the Lorentz transformations in spin $1/2$ representation. [^3]: One can see that for the conformall...
740
276
383
647
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
0.994 0.996 0.994 K=100 0.994 0.998 0.998 0.990 0.988 0.994 0.996 K=150 0.994 1.000 0.998 0.986 0.992 0.998 0.990 mVC 0.918 0....
741
4,952
260
434
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
pi(C^\lambda,k)$ does not depend on the given $\Q$-resolution. Also, the following upper semi-continuity property will be useful. \[lemma:propsM\] Under the above conditions: 1. \[lemma:propsM:epsilon\] $\cM_\pi(C^\lambda,k)=\cM_\pi(C^{\lambda+\varepsilon},k)$ for a sufficiently small $\varepsilon>0$. 2. \[lemma:p...
742
423
740
802
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
above, the original idea is to change only the complex coupling strength $\lambda_c$ to one channel $c$, while the measuring is done on one or two different channels $a,b\neq c$. We denote the resulting scattering fidelity by *coupling fidelity*. We present below an exact RMT prediction for this quantity. The starting...
743
2,608
1,235
768
2,693
0.777818
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
and the Rubin et. al. data set [@Rubin1980]. Except the last set, the observed velocity curves is fitted to either $v^{\hbox{\scriptsize{p-iso}}}(r)$, or to a functionally similar velocity curve [@Cour]. The last set gives only the galactic rotation curves, and they have been fitted to $v^{\hbox{\scriptsize{p-iso}}}(r...
744
4,808
494
524
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
oplus H(1)$. For this choice of a basis, the block associated to $\tilde{M}_0\oplus M_2$ of the image of a fixed element of $F_j$ in the special fiber of the smooth integral model associated to $L^j$ is $$\begin{pmatrix} id&0 &0\\ 0 &\begin{pmatrix} 1&\frac{1}{1+4b''}(-2z_j^{\ast})\\ 0 & 1+\frac{1}{1+4...
745
421
741
762
2,668
0.777997
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
serve that for the convex set $G$ actually $\tau_{e,-}(y,\omega)=\infty$ for all $(y,\omega,E)\in \Gamma_{e,-}$. \[tthcon\] The trace mappings $$\gamma_{e,\pm}:W^2(G_e\times S\times I)\to T^2(\Gamma_{e,\pm})$$ are (well-defined) bounded surjective operators with bounded right inverses (lifts) $L_{e,\pm}: T^2(\Gamma_...
746
357
749
876
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
shida]{}, T. 2016, , 68, 16 , M., [Ohsuga]{}, K., [Wada]{}, K., [Susa]{}, H., & [Misawa]{}, T. 2013, , 65, arXiv:1212.3075 , G. S., [Ostriker]{}, J. P., & [Ciotti]{}, L. 2011, , 737, 26 , S. P., & [Haiman]{}, Z. 2002, , 569, 558 , K., [Mori]{}, M., [Nakamoto]{}, T., & [Mineshige]{}, S. 2005, , 628, 368 , K., [Schn...
747
1,023
2,985
973
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
\ \mathcal{Z}_i&1 \end{pmatrix} & \quad \textit{if $L_i$ is \textit{bound of type II}};\\ (m_{i,i})_1 & \quad \textit{if $L_i$ is \textit{free of type II}}. \end{array} \right.$$ Here, $$\left\{ \begin{array}{l} \mathcal{X}_i=(v_i)_1+(\delta_{i-2}e_{i-2}\cdot (m_{i-2, i})_1+\delta_{i+2}e_{i+2}\cdot (m_{i+2, i...
748
3,556
674
509
2,616
0.778415
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
ults efficiently from practical sample sizes. Keywords: software, safety, hazard, demonstration, operational profile, automata, confidence, statistics author: - '\' title: Software Safety Demonstration and Indemnification --- \[section\] \[theorem\][Lemma]{} \[theorem\][Corollary]{} \[theorem\][Conjecture]{} \[th...
749
160
1,405
539
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
ng are equivalent statements.* \(1) *$D$ is dense in $X$*. \(2) *If $F$ is any closed set of $X$ with $D\subseteq F$, then $F=X$*; *thus the only closed superset of $D$ is $X$.* \(3) *Every nonempty (basic) open set of $X$ cuts $D;$ thus the only open set disjoint from $D$ is the empty set $\emptyset$.* \(4) *The e...
750
1,630
1,778
770
1,231
0.792355
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
1 Note that only 48 children could be included in the analyses, due to the age restrictions of some of the questionnaires (FES and PSS). 2 Obtained by fitting a second model, including the subscales of the FES, inst...
751
53
1,295
944
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
e can prove Lemma $\ref{lem:4-1-3}$. We use the following formula [@andrews_askey_roy_1999 p.22, Theorem 6.5.1]: $$\begin{aligned} \G(2a) = \frac{2^{2a - 1}}{\sqrt{\pi}} \G(a) \G\left(a + \frac{1}{2} \right). \end{aligned}$$ From this and Lemma $\ref{lem:4-1-1}$, we have $$\begin{aligned} 2 \G(2a) - a \G(a)^{2} &= \f...
752
2,601
909
811
3,284
0.77348
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
!= j, i != "y" && j != "y", and both i and j are adjacent to each other. I'm having difficulty concocting an algorithm to create an adjacency matrix provided a char[][] array. I've defined the rules, but finding constraints for iteration is problematic. A: Try this: static void set(boolean[][] aM, int cols, int row0,...
753
997
15
708
50
0.831505
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
=1$. (The order of the rules in $m_r$ is arbitrary). Additionally, $M$ contains the starting and the terminating matrices $$(S'\to [S] S \overline{A_1} \cdots \overline{A_m}) \mbox{ and } (\overline{S} \to {\lambda},\overline{A_1} \to {\lambda}, \ldots,\overline{A_m} \to {\lambda}),$$ where $V=\{S,A_1,\ldots,A_m\}$. I...
754
1,862
1,735
774
1,300
0.791397
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
nt of $F_j$ in the even orthogonal group associated to $M_0''$, where $M_0''$ is a Jordan component of $Y(C(L^j))=\bigoplus_{i \geq 0} M_i''$. As in the above case (1), there are 3 cases depending on whether $(a+a')/2$ is a unit or not, and whether $M_1=\oplus H(1)$ (possibly empty) or $M_1=A(4b'', 2\delta, \pi) \oplus...
755
804
945
792
3,162
0.77442
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
i*. Note that a small value is added to *Y~i~* for the logarithm. Adding epigenetic effects ------------------------- Discrete values representing epigenetic states of a gene *i* are added to the regression model where *H* is the type of histone mark (neither mark=1.0, H3K27me3=2.0, bivalent mark=3.0, H3K4me3=4.0), ...
756
112
2,109
874
1,458
0.789311
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
19 (17.6) 38 (24.2)   0.75 (0.12, 4.88) C/T 27 (17.1) 5 (13.5)   2.70 (0.20, 35.75) T/T 2 (1.9) 3 (1.9) 0.4332 1 T/T 2 (1.3) 1 (2.7) 0.7216 1 C/C + C/T 106 (98...
757
4,328
784
352
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
that the $S2R_p$ policy is defined to reference the $P2P$ values regardless of whether the $P2P_p$ policy itself is active. The separation kernels of VxWorks MILS, LynxSecure, INTEGRITY-178B and PikeOS meet the security functionalities and security assurance requirements in SKPP. ### Data Separation Properties Data...
758
1,983
2,093
777
505
0.807656
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
scending aorta (50 mm) and diffuse atherosclerotic disease, without any obstructive lesions. Elective transfemoral TAVI was scheduled. ![Patient's electrocardiogram on admission: sinus rhythm with left axis deviation and repolarization abnormalities.](ytz069f1){#ytz069-F1} ###### Blood tests results Parameters (...
759
5,001
358
294
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
nd{aligned}$$ where $g$ takes values in the supergroup $G$ and $Tr'$ indicates the non-degenerate bi-invariant metric. We will use the normalization and results of [@Ashok:2009xx]. The Wess-Zumino-Witten points are given by the equation $1/f^2 = |k|$. Note that the action is invariant under group inversion $g \leftrigh...
760
430
1,356
848
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
{-\beta }}\Big). \end{aligned}$$ Recall that $\beta '_\nu \not={\alpha }_{i_1}$, since $\nu >1$. Moreover, $$\begin{aligned} &e^{(1-{b^{\chi}} ({\alpha }_{i_1})){\alpha }_{i_1}}{\sigma }_{i_1}^{\chi _2}\Big( \frac {1-e^{-\bfun{\chi _2}({\alpha }_{i_1}){\alpha }_{i_1}}} {1-e^{-{\alpha }_{i_1}}}\Big)\\ ...
761
1,007
665
795
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
the ket, which will terminate upon raising the highest-weight state. Therefore the vector bases with different weights $k, k^\prime$ are orthogonal. Since we have also proved that vector bases with different $m$ and $h-k$ are orthogonal, the proof of orthogonality for vector bases is done. It may not be obvious that ...
762
2,108
940
776
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
-t0A2_Table A2 ###### LCMS analysis of FIX-PCC pre-filtrate following filtration with 6 μm filter. Accession Description Score Coverage MW \[kDa\] calc. pI ----------- ----------------------------------------------- --------- ---------- ------------ ---------- P00...
763
5,107
270
270
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
again by abuse of language) the partial order induced on $\phi _{AD}^{Q}/\approx $ by the preorder defined on $\phi _{AD}^{Q}$. Then, let us show that $(\phi _{AD}^{Q}/\approx ,\prec )$ is order isomorphic to $(\mathcal{L(S)},\subset ) $. Let us consider the mapping $f_{\approx }:[\delta ]_{\approx }\in \psi _{AD}^{Q...
764
1,483
692
815
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
n as Eq. . We substitute the highest-weight metric perturbation into the left hand side of the linearized Einstein equation and the result is given by Eq. . $$\begin{aligned} {} h^{(m\,h\,0)}_{ab} &= R^h e^{im\Phi} \left[ \begin{array}{cccc} R^{+2}C_{TT}(u) & R^{+1} C_{T\Phi}(u) & R^{+0}C _{TR}(...
765
2,009
997
760
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
{T}}$ involves a semistandard homomorphism which does not occur in any other ${\psi_{2,2}}\circ{\hat\Theta_{T'}}$ (except possibly for a tableau $T'$ already ruled out in the paragraph above). So we may restrict attention to those $T$ having at most one $2$ and one $3$ in the first row. Now return to ${\psi_{2,1}}\cir...
766
291
537
809
165
0.821369
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
redict future video frames in a self-supervised manner. Remarkably, the model is able to capture a wide variety of seemingly disparate phenomena observed in visual cortex, ranging from single unit response dynamics to complex perceptual motion illusions. These results suggest potentially deep connections between recurr...
767
119
1,346
603
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
\pi t_i\\ \pi y_i&1+\pi x_i&\pi z_i\\ v_i&u_i&1+\pi w_i \end{pmatrix}= \begin{pmatrix} \mathrm{id}+\pi s_i^{\prime}&\pi r_i^{\prime}&\pi^2t_i^{\prime}\\ \pi^2y_i^{\prime}&1+\pi^2x_i^{\prime}&\pi^2z_i^{\prime}\\ \pi v_i^{\prime}&\pi u_i^{\prime}&1+\pi^2w_i^{\prime} \end{pmatrix}.$$ 4. If $i$ is even and $L_i$ is ...
768
4,164
343
552
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
computed, the app sets the system in UM and manages the model transfer to the MCU. This operation allows to correctly store the personalized model in the Flash memory of the MCU and use it for real-time classification. The communication protocol sends 3 types of packets containing the following: the general configurat...
769
56
874
755
2,351
0.780647
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
dth"} ### Topics navigation {#subsubsec:topicalnavi .unnumbered} #### Wikigame topic dataset Performing our analyses by representing Wikipedia pages by their topical categories shows a much clearer and more interesting picture as one can see in Figure \[fig:paths\_cat\]. Similar to above we can see (A) that the log ...
770
3,253
1,835
822
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
ions can then be solved automatically in the constraint-based approach, based on Proposition 3 of [@DBLP:journals/corr/abs-0912-4360]. \[prop:rem\_imp\] Let $prem$ be a polynomial over $n$ variables and $conc$ a polynomial over 1 variable, both with natural coefficients, where $conc$ is not a constant. Moreover, let $...
771
297
1,503
907
285
0.814737
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
# General characteristics of the study population (N = 277). ![](pone.0231480.t001){#pone.0231480.t001g} Characteristics Genotypes ---------------------------------- ---------------- ------------- ------------- ------------ Gender N (%) ...
772
630
935
996
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
s^{-q}(\alpha'_{n,j}) (-q,q) - \alpha'_{n,j} \s^{q}(\beta_{m,s}) (q,-q).$$ Using the equalities $(-p,p)=\s^{-p}((p,-p))$ and $(-q,q)=\s^{-q}((q,-q))$, the last equality above can be rewritten as follows $$\label{1=ab} 1 = (1-\s^{-p})(a) + (1-\s^{-q})(b)$$ where $a = \alpha_{n,i} \s^{p}(\beta'_{m,t}) (p,-p) \in K[H]$ a...
773
486
862
782
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
)\ &+&4 d\_F \_f $\frac{\Lambda}{4\pi T}$\^[2]{}+O\[\^6\]. The renormalized quark free-energy is given as F\_q\^r &=&- d\_F \_f(1+12\^2 ) +4 d\_F \_f where $\hat \Lambda=\Lambda/2\pi T$ and $\hat \mu=\mu/2\pi T$. Gauge boson free-energy in a strongly magnetized medium {#gauge_boson} ----------------------------------...
774
215
1,679
997
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
_j)$. But then, $\psi_i$ and $\psi'_j$ are necessarily of degree $-s$. The exactness of $\textbf{D} (\mathcal O^!)$ at the degree $-s$ implies that $\psi$s of the degree $-s$ are exact, i.e. there are elements $\Psi_i, \Psi'_j\in \textbf{D}(\mathcal O^!)$ such that $\psi_i={\partial}(\Psi_i)$, $\psi'_j ={\partial}(\Psi...
775
505
703
850
3,596
0.771314
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
model or in an ensemble setting.' author: - | Tim Leathart, Eibe Frank, Bernhard Pfahringer and Geoffrey Holmes\ Department of Computer Science, University of Waikato, New Zealand bibliography: - 'multi\_subset\_nd.bib' title: Ensembles of Nested Dichotomies with Multiple Subset Evaluation --- Introduction ==...
776
580
1,133
457
2,466
0.779528
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
among the AMI inpatients and there was no significant difference in mortality rates among males and females (28% *vs* 19.4%; *P*=0.10). In our study, binary logistic regression analysis identified only three predictor variables for the prognosis of AMI inpatients \[[Table 1](#T0001){ref-type="table"}\]. Patients repor...
777
3,252
726
329
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
Load() A: generic_visit is called when a custom visitor (ie visit_Name) can't be found. Here's a piece of code I wrote recently with ast.NodeVisitor: https://foss.heptapod.net/pypy/pypy/-/blob/80ead76ab428100ffeb01109c7fc0d94f1048af2/py/_code/_assertionnew.py It interprets the AST nodes to gain debugging inform...
778
4,630
282
563
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
^{x}L}}$ up to $(H\cap {\ ^{x}L})$-conjugacy, is an $R$-basis of $\mu_{R}(G)$. Section $3$ of [@tw]. \[prop\_b\] The Mackey algebra $\mu_{R}(G)$ is isomorphic to $RB(\Omega_{G}^{2})$, where $\Omega_{G}$ is the $G$-set: $\sqcup_{L\leqslant G} G/L$. The proof can be found in Proposition $4.5.1$ of [@bouc_green]. Let u...
779
753
955
725
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
om a node $N_b$ to a node $N_e$, is identified based on three properties. The path should be applicable, independent from the concrete terms represented by the input variables. Therefore, the first property states that no substitutions on input variables may occur between $N_b$ and $N_e$. The second property states tha...
780
3,384
1,814
753
1,409
0.789951
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
(a_5=0,b_2=0\right)}+P{\left(a_5=1,b_1=2\right)}+P{\left(a_5=2,b_6=2\right)}+P{\left(a_6=0,b_8=1\right)}+\\ & \quad +P{\left(a_6=1,b_5=0\right)}+P{\left(a_6=2,b_7=2\right)}+P{\left(a_7=0,b_3=1\right)}+P{\left(a_7=1,b_6=0\right)}+\\ & \quad +P{\left(a_7=2,b_1=0\right)}+P{\left(a_8=0,b_6=1\right)}+P{\left(a_8=1,b_3=0\rig...
781
1,841
1,364
931
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
h{b_{2}-p_{1,2}} & \ensuremath{1-a_{1}-b_{2}+p_{1,2}} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\ensuremath{1-a_{1}}}\tabularnewline\cline{1-4} \cline{6-9} & \ensuremath{b_{1}} & \ensuremath{1-b_{1}} & & & & \ensuremath{b_{2}} & \ensuremath{1-b_{2}} & \tabularnewline\cline{2-3} \cline{7-8} \multicolumn{1}{c}{} & & \multi...
782
2,400
1,226
797
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
er branes in the construction. This calculation was made in detail in [@Dfoam], where we refer the interested reader for further details. Here we mention only the results relevant for the present discussion. ![*Schematic representation of a D-particle space-time foam model with bulk density $n^\star (r) $ of D-particl...
783
2,245
2,849
910
3,429
0.772444
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
finish we give the details for $k=10$. In order to study the cokernel of $\pi^{(10)}$, let us fix a basis $\mathcal{B}_1 := \{ x^5, x^4y, x^3y^2, x^2y^3, xy^4, y^5, x^2 z, xyz, y^2z \}$ of $H^0(\PP^2_w,\mathcal{O}_{\PP^2_w}(k-5))$ and a basis $\mathcal{B}_2 = \langle 1,y_1,y_1^2,y_1^3,y_1^4,z_1 \rangle_\CC \oplus \lang...
784
1,630
757
830
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
ribution. We then have $$\begin{aligned} \label{eq:Epsilarge} E_\Psi &\approx \sqrt{2}\left(\left(1-\beta\right){\mathrm{erf}}^{-1}\left(1-\frac{2}{\Psi}\right)+\beta\mathrm{erf}^{-1}\left(1-\frac{2}{e\Psi}\right)\right),\end{aligned}$$ where $\beta$ denotes the Euler’s constant. Substituting into completes the proof. ...
785
835
1,136
847
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
\circ{\hat\Theta_{T}}$ over all $T\in{\calu}$, we get zero. A similar argument applies in the case $d=v$. If $1\ls d<v$ and $t=2$, then we have ${\psi_{d,t}}\circ{\hat\Theta_{T}}=0$ for each $T\in{\calu}$ just using Lemma \[lemma5\]. Now take $2\ls d<v$ and $t=1$, and consider a tableau $T\in{\calu}$. There are a sing...
786
558
885
794
320
0.813436
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
lpha^2 F^2 \over 4} \bigg ({\rm sin^2}\phi + {\alpha^2 \ {\rm sin^2}\theta \over F^2}\bigg) +{\tau_0 \tau_1 \alpha^3 F \over 2}\rm sin\theta cos\phi \bigg] \Psi = \varepsilon\Psi\end{aligned}$$ $$\Rightarrow H_\tau\ \Psi = \varepsilon \Psi.$$ Calculational scheme ==================== To proceed with a basis set exp...
787
3,858
1,080
705
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
a.eps){width="\colwidth"} ![image](f4b.eps){width="\colwidth"}\ ![image](f4c.eps){width="\colwidth"} ![image](f4d.eps){width="\colwidth"} Results {#sec:results} ======= Detected host galaxies {#sec:resolved} ---------------------- Using the above criteria for detecting a residual host galaxy, we find nine of the 23 ...
788
32
1,298
966
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
me from single or double powers in $W$ in $\hat{H}_{1}$ are always accompanied by the matter potential in the form of $WA$ or $W^{\dagger} A$, as in eq. (\[H1-matrix\]). That is, perturbative effect of $W$ is always accompanied by matter potential, and hence can always be dealt with matter perturbation theory. It is th...
789
787
1,174
916
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
ight\Vert}_{L^\infty(G\times S)}^{1/2} {\left\Vert \int_S \tilde{\sigma}(\cdot,\cdot,\omega',E) d\omega'\right\Vert}_{L^\infty(G\times S)}^{1/2},\end{aligned}$$ where ${\left\Vert K(E)\right\Vert}$ is the norm of $K(E)$ as an operator in $L^2(G\times S)$. Hence under the assumption (\[ass2a\]) the operator $K(E):L^2(G\...
790
206
462
906
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
\otimes_{[B]}X.$$ This defines a natural isomorphism $u^\ast\cong \big((u\times\id)^\ast\lI_B\big)\otimes_{[B]}-\colon{\sD}^B\to{\sD}^A$, thereby exhibiting $u^\ast$ as a weighted colimit. Similarly, if we fix $X\in{\sD}(A)$, then by the partial morphism $$\label{eq:par-mor-wcolim} (-\otimes_{[A]}X)\colon{\sV}^{A\op}\...
791
496
1,342
823
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
Delta\equiv -w_2^{-1} \mod (w_0w_1)$ and define $$\label{eq:Mj} M_j:=(\Delta w_2+1)\deg_w \cC_j,\quad \text{ for all } j=1,..,r,$$ then $M_j$ satisfies \[prop:5\]. By construction $M=(\Delta w_2+1)\deg_w \cC $ which proves \[prop:4\] and $\frac{M}{\deg_w \cC}=\Delta w_2+1$ satisfies \[prop:6\]. Since $\Delta$ can be ch...
792
459
219
970
2,028
0.783333
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
ated as ${\mathsf{Stab}_L}(\Phi)$ for very small classes $\Phi$ of functors such as $\{\emptyset\}$ and $\{\emptyset,\ulcorner\}$. Can they also be generated as ${\mathsf{Stab}_L}({\mathsf{Abs}_L}(\Upsilon))$ for “manageable” collections $\Upsilon$ of derivators? For instance, are there “universal” pointed or stable de...
793
758
2,130
967
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
-1/2$. There is a multiplicity of left vacua, arising from $\lambda^{7-14}$. Let $|m\rangle$ denote a vacuum with $m$ +’s and $8-m$ -’s, [*i.e.*]{} annihilated by $m$ $\lambda$’s and $8-m$ $\overline{\lambda}$’s, then under the action of the generator of ${\mathbb Z}_4$, it is straightforward to check that $|m=0,4,8\r...
794
2,064
1,841
893
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
\pi^{*}H = c E$. Note that $\pi^{*} D_1 = \hat D_1 + \frac{1}{d} E$ and $\pi^{*} D_2 = \hat D_2 + \frac{p}{d} E$. Then, $$\begin{aligned} \pi^{*} L^{(k)} &= -k \pi^{*} H + \sum_{i=1}^r {\left \lfloor \frac{kn_i}{n} \right \rfloor} \hat D_i + \left( \frac{1}{d} {\left \lfloor \frac{kn_1}{n} \right \rfloor} + \frac{p}{d...
795
335
514
856
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
gle=2n(\lambda)+|\lambda|=\sum_i(\lambda'_i)^2$, where $\lambda'=(\lambda'_1,\lambda'_2,\dots)$ is the dual partition. Note also that $(\lambda\cup\mu)'=\lambda'+\mu'$. Define $$\|\lambda\|:=\sqrt{\langle\lambda',\lambda'\rangle}=\sqrt{\sum_i\lambda_i^2}.$$ The following inequality is a particular case of the theorem o...
796
1,118
1,090
864
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
in previous steps. This question is the motivation for reverse inference, which considers automata operating backwards. ### Iterative converse {#S:ITERATIVE_CONVERSE} Let $\langle \Psi, \Phi \rangle$ be a basis with persistent-volatile partition $\Psi = \Phi\Xi$ and step space ${\mathbb{S}} = \Lambda \times {\mathsc...
797
1,878
897
850
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
the model is shown in Fig. \[fig:skt\]. ![Sketch of the model of colloidal dumbbells (bright yellow and dark red spheres) and droplets (white spheres). Shown are the diameters of colloidal species 1, $\sigma_{1}$, colloidal species 2, $\sigma_{2}$, and droplet $\sigma_{d}$. (a) In the initial stages the droplet captu...
798
2,292
2,047
890
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
l response value and its displacement *w.r.t.* its parent latent pattern. Please see the appendix for details. Based on the above node definitions, we can use the AOG to parse each given image $I$ by dynamic programming in a bottom-up manner. ### Learning And-Or graphs {#sec:learnAOG} The core of learning AOGs is to...
799
155
840
839
538
0.806357
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
e-dependent measurements or measurements of correlated $D^0\overline{D}^0$ pairs. In principle, using the above observables the system Eqs. (\[eq:decomp-1\])–(\[eq:decomp-4\]) is exactly solvable as long as the data is very precise. In the CP limit the branching ratio measurements $(i)$ and the strong phase $(ii)$ are...
800
1,733
1,623
909
1,882
0.784718
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg