text
large_stringlengths
384
2.05k
rank_avg
float64
1
4.19k
rank_max
float64
1
8.21k
rank_min
float64
1
5.03k
rank_median
float64
1
4.21k
rank_by_avgsim
float64
1
4.19k
avgsim_to_github
float32
0.77
0.85
dataset
large_stringclasses
1 value
s, unlike for a linear operator, the non-existence of an inverse is not just due the set $\{ f^{-1}(0)\}$ which happens to be the only way a linear map can fail to be injective. Thus the map defined piecewise as $\alpha+2(1-\alpha)x$ for $0\leq x<1/2$ and $2(1-x)$ for $1/2\leq x\leq1$, with $0<\alpha<1$, is not inverti...
801
395
1,479
843
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
et(M)=4\gamma^3(\gamma-1)^9=4+2\gamma^3\ne 0$ and so we can use recover $a_\tau$ as before. Generalization to more servers {#sec-kserver} ============================== In this section we prove Theorem \[THM-kserver\]. As was mentioned in the introduction, we will allow the database symbols to belong to a slightly la...
802
1,686
1,363
779
3,540
0.771672
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
erturbations (a)–(c) described in Sec. \[sec:exper\]. For all results below the system without the varied antenna, corresponding to $\lambda=0$, is chosen as the reference, whereas for the perturbed system the coupling constant is $\lambda'=\lambda_{50\Omega}$, $\lambda_{\rm oe}$, or $\lambda_{\rm hw}$, depending on th...
803
175
730
796
2,150
0.782256
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
of size one, i.e. $\lrabs{\eta}=1$, we define $$\begin{aligned} H(w) := \E{\zeta(w,\eta) \zeta(w,\eta)^T } \numberthis\label{e:m0}\end{aligned}$$ as the covariance matrix of the difference between the true gradient and a single sampled gradient at $w$. A standard run of SGD, with minibatch size $b := \lrabs{\eta_k} $,...
804
665
740
895
1,206
0.792764
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
n</p> </div> <div class="col-md-3"> <p>Fourth column</p> </div> </div> A: use linear-gradient in body , giving your .container is the parent, and you won't have any wrapper around .container Sorry that I'm bothering you, but what I meant was to place the image like this image.prntscr.com/image/78940c8115c9...
805
6,332
98
122
33
0.834546
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
is nontrivial in the total Hilbert space including unphysical degrees of freedom. In any case, except for such an unphysical complexity, we have now understood how space-time supersymmetry is realized in superstring field theory, and therefore are ready to study various consequences of space-time supersymmetry[@Kishim...
806
1,416
1,442
867
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
ee bosons in the semi-classical limit, as anticipated. At fixed $kf^2$ and for each interaction vertex, the power of the coupling constant $f$ is equal to the number of structure constants that appear. Since we are interested in computing OPEs involving the currents and the primary fields, let us write these fields in ...
807
1,326
1,489
899
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
[$\frac{1}{4}(-1,3)$]{}; at ($.5*(D)+.5*(B)+(-1.5,.8)$) [$E_2$]{}; ($.5*(B)+.5*(D)-(0,.75)$) circle \[radius=.1cm\]; at ($.5*(D)+.5*(B)-(-.25,.5)$) [$\frac{1}{3}(-1,4)$]{}; ($.5*(F)+.5*(C)+(0,-1)$) node\[below=3\] [$-\frac{1}{30}$]{} – ($.5*(F)+.5*(C)+(0,1.5)$); at ($.5*(F)+.5*(C)+(-1.5,.5)$) [$\frac{1}{3}(-1,10)$]{...
808
1,450
627
817
2,831
0.776712
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
by other variables when $L_i$ is *of type* $\textit{I}^o$ (resp. *of type* $\textit{I}^e$), and so on. From now on, we eliminate suitable variables based on Equations (\[ea20\]), (\[ea22\]), (\[24\]), (\[24’\]), (\[ea25\]), (\[ea27\]), and (\[ea32\]), the equations $\sum_{l=0}^{k_j}z_{j-l}^{\ast}+\sum_{l=0}^{k_j} \bar...
809
572
1,438
959
2,731
0.777451
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
nonumber\end{aligned}$$ Moreover, we have the following relations, $$\begin{aligned} & & \mbox{exp} \left( \hat{b}^{ij}_+(u) \right) : \mbox{exp} \left( \hat{b}^{i'j'}(v) \right) : \\ & &~~~~= \left( \frac{u-v-\frac{1}{2} \hbar} {u-v +\frac{1}{2} \hbar} \right)^{\delta^{ii'} \delta^{jj'}} : \mbox{exp} \left( \hat{b}^...
810
385
959
869
4,001
0.768698
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
re $k =|{\widehat{S}}| < n$. For the LOCO and prediction parameters, based on $\mathcal{D}_{1,n}$, we also compute $\widehat{\beta}_{{\widehat{S}}}$, any estimator of the projection parameters restricted to ${\widehat{S}}$. In addition, for each $j \in {\widehat{S}}$, we further compute, still using $\mathcal{D}_{1,n}$...
811
329
701
849
2,471
0.779486
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
; \\ \mathcal{X}_{i,2,3}(m)={}^tr_i\bar{a}_it_i+x_i+z_iu_i+\mathcal{P}^i_{2, 3}=\bar{d}_i=0 \end{array} \right.$$ and $$\begin{gathered} \label{24'} \mathcal{X}_{i,2,2}(m)=\bar{\gamma}_i+z_i+z_i^2+1/2\left({}^tm_{i-1, i}'h_{i-1}m_{i-1, i}'+{}^tm_{i+1, i}'h_{i+1}m_{i+1, i}'\right)+\\ \textit{ ...
812
1,770
752
870
3,244
0.773793
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
\frac{\nabla D(X)}{D(x)}} dx = \int_{0}^{x} \lrp{\frac{\nabla U(x)}{D(x)}} dx + \log D(x) - \log D(0)$. We can verify that $p^*(x) \propto e^{-V(x)}$ satisfies . For a concrete example, let the potential $U(x)$ and the diffusion function $M(x)$ be defined as $$\begin{aligned} & U(x) := \threecase{\frac{1}{2} x^2}...
813
3,175
1,028
748
1,527
0.788615
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
$ (resp. $g_{i+2, i}$) if $L_{i-2}$ (resp. $L_{i+2}$) is *of type* $\textit{I}^o$. - $k_{i-2, i}$ (resp. $k_{i+2, i}$) is the $(n_{i-2}-1, n_i)^{th}$-entry (resp. $(n_{i+2}-1, n_i)^{th}$-entry) of the matrix $g_{i-2, i}$ (resp. $g_{i+2, i}$) if $L_{i-2}$ (resp. $L_{i+2}$) is *of type* $\textit{I}^e$.\ 4. A...
814
4,439
251
487
2,630
0.778255
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
ality proposal in this example predicts that the dual is defined by a heterotic $E_8 \times E_8$ compactification on $[T^4/{\mathbb Z}_2]$, with $E_8$ bundle defined by ${\cal E}^* \otimes {\cal E}$, $\wedge^{\rm even} {\cal E}$, for ${\cal E} = {\cal O}^8$ on $T^4$, but such that ${\cal E}^* \otimes {\cal E}$ and $\we...
815
765
1,147
771
2,098
0.782756
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
114 116 0.0300 Only blood urea nitrogen differences met criteria for partitioning by season for reference intervals. 10.1371/journal.pone.0115739.t003 ###### Hematology and plasma biochemical parameters that were significantly correlated with water temperature in ju...
816
5,574
267
275
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
silon}}$, then $$\begin{aligned} W_1\lrp{p^*, p^y_{k\delta}} \leq 2\hat{\epsilon} \end{aligned}$$ where $p^y_t := \Law(\by_t)$. Let $\epsilon := \frac{\lambda}{16 (L+\LN^2)} \exp\lrp{-\frac{7\aq\Rq^2}{3}} \hat{\epsilon}$. Let $f$ be defined as in Lemma \[l:fproperties\] with the parameter $\epsilon$. ...
817
1,544
780
835
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
b \beta \int_{0}^{+\infty} (b z + c)^{2} \exp{\left( - z^{\frac{1}{a}} \right)} dz \allowdisplaybreaks \\ &= (k_{1}^{2} + k_{2}^{2}) b^{3} \beta \int_{0}^{+\infty} z^{2} \exp{\left( - z^{\frac{1}{a}} \right)} dz + (k_{1}^{2} - k_{2}^{2}) b^{3} \beta \int_{0}^{c / b} z^{2} \exp{\left( - z^{\frac{1}{a}} \right)} dz ...
818
4,054
795
613
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
uence ${\mathscr{I}} \to {\mathbb{S}}$ of steps (usually ${\mathscr{I}}$ will be the natural numbers ${\mathbb{N}}$). We revisit the three fundamental P’s (path, procedure, and process – §\[S:THREE\_P\]). A walk in step space decomposes into these three sequences: $\textrm{walk}_{\,i} = (\textrm{path}_{\,i}, \textrm{p...
819
851
1,603
806
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
to Appendix \[nc\] to get a first glimpse into why the case of $p=2$ is really different. Some of the ideas behind our construction can be seen in the simple example illustrated in Appendix \[cfot\]. Acknowledgements ---------------- This paper was initially the second half of [@C2]. Due to a huge number of pages an...
820
435
370
886
2,050
0.783186
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
0 0 1 0 0.25 0  Fatal 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 3 0.25 0.75 Cardiac events (n=2)  Fatal ...
821
3,590
834
700
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
cancer (*n* = 5), malignancies of the upper respiratory tract (*n* = 2), advanced melanoma (*n* = 2), Hodgkin\'s lymphoma (*n* = 1) and Merkel cell carcinoma (*n* = 1) ([@B7]--[@B15]). With respect to demographics, the patients were either of Asian (*n* = 6) or Caucasian (*n* = 5) origin, aged 49--87 years and predomi...
822
713
887
1,186
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
rans\] demonstrates that the desired result is obtained when the time scales are prolonged: With $T_{\rm ramp} = 200\,T$ and $T_{\rm pulse} = 1070\,T$, one has practically complete transfer. It is, of course, also possible to employ the method outlined here to prepare the particle in superpositions of defect states. F...
823
3,997
1,997
972
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
ac{1-u^2}{u^2+1} & 0 \\ \mathcal{D}_u & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \noalign{\bigskip} \text{} & C_T'(u) & C_\Phi'(u) & C_R'(u) & C_u'(u) \\ \noalign{\smallskip} \hline \hline \noalign{\smallskip} \mathcal{D}_T & -\frac{4 u}{\left(u^2+1\right)^2} & -\frac{2 u \left(u^2-3\right)}{\left(u^2+1\right)^2} & 0 & 0 \\ \mathcal{D...
824
2,989
1,053
812
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
will be left as a free constant. Note that the integrand in eq. (\[Pf\]) is precisely of the form shown in eq. (\[projection\]). In fact, on large scales (small $k_\parallel$ as well as $k$ i.e. small compared to $k^s_\parallel$, $1/b_{T_0}$ and $k_F$), modulo multiplicative factors, it reduces to the famous Kaiser [...
825
2,025
1,527
887
2,595
0.7786
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
th order F\^[(0)]{}\_[abc]{} \_a A\_[bc]{} - \_b A\_[ac]{}. The first term of (\[3-point-1\]) comes from the Lie algebra structure of this generalized YM theory. The second term arises due to the field-dependent inner-product of the Lie algebra. Near the end of Sec.\[heuristic\], we discussed how the formulation of gr...
826
188
1,559
958
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
d\]) we get the set of winning values given in Table 1. s, t Alice, Bob ------ ------------ 14 01, 10, 22 15 01, 10, 22 17 00, 12, 21 24 02, 11, 20 25 01, 10, 22 28 02, 11, 20 34 00, 11, 22 37 00, 11, 22 38 02, 10, 21 41 01, 10, 22 42 02, 11, 20 ...
827
4,241
1,230
532
3,711
0.770535
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
{r^2}{2}}{r\leq \R} {\frac{\R^2}{2} + \R (r-\R) + \frac{(r-\R)^2}{2}- \frac{(r-\R)^3}{3\R}}{r\in[\R,2\R]} {\frac{5\R^2}{3} + \R(r-2\R) - \frac{(r-2\R)^2}{2} + \frac{(r-2\R)^3}{12\R}}{r\in [2\R,4\R]} {\frac{7\R^2}{3}}{r\geq 4\R]} \end{aligned}$$ Then 1. $\tau'(r) \in [0,...
828
2,707
911
841
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
k National University in 2015. Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University. ![Growth curve of *S. pyogenes* cultured under normal gravity (NG) and low shear modeled microgravity (LSMMG) in BHI broth.](gr1){#f0005} ![Morphology of *S. pyogenes* under transmission electron microscope grown under (A) norma...
829
95
1,756
1,140
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
is therefore a function indexed by a directed set. We adopt the convention of denoting nets in the manner of functions and do not use the sequential notation $\chi_{\alpha}$ that can also be found in the literature. Thus, while every sequence is a special type of net, $\chi:\!\mathbb{Z}\rightarrow X$ is an example of ...
830
2,931
1,954
855
2,750
0.777292
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
F\_j, V\_[1,j]{}(0)=0, where $(V_{1,j}(\eta))(x,\omega)=V_{1,j}(x,\omega,\eta)$ and $(F_j(\eta))(x,\omega)=F_j(x,\omega,\eta)$. The $C^0$-semigroup $G(\eta)$ generated by $B_0-\Sigma_j$ is (by the Trotter’s formula) given by \[infgen\] (G()h)(x,) = e\^[-\_0\^\_j(x-,) d]{}H(t(x,)-)h(x-,). Hence the solution $V_{1,j}$ is...
831
203
1,453
980
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
ments, namely dynamic graph and hypergraph models. In order to measure the dynamicity, [we introduce]{} the notion of *pair visibility*. For a pair $\{i,j\}$ of distinct vertices, the *visibility* of $\{i, j\}$, denoted by ${\ensuremath{\operatorname{\mathtt{vis}}(i,j)}}$, is the number of rounds $t\in\{1,\ldots, n\}$ ...
832
637
1,297
889
1,482
0.789013
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
definition. Read more about it in this blog article Q: Changing a property modifier when merging an interface The Window interface has a few properties that are readonly: interface Window extends ... { // ... readonly innerHeight: number; readonly innerWidth: number; // ... } I get that those cannot reall...
833
4,239
11
769
324
0.813367
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
in $B\otimes_AR$. Thus there are exactly $(n_i-2)$ independent linear equations among the entries of $v_i'$ and $r_i'$. 3. The $(1,3)$-block is $$\label{ea8} e_i'=\pi(- {}^ty_i'+a_it_i').$$ This is an equation in $B\otimes_AR$. By letting $e_i'=e_i=0$, there are exactly $(n_i-2)$ independent linear equa...
834
2,070
1,370
854
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
3---S6 90.68 (4) C40---C41---H41 119.7 S5---Ag3---S6 87.08 (4) C41---C42---C43 120.5 (5) P4---Ag3---W2 117.46 (3) C41---C42---H42 119.8 P3---Ag3---W2 104.71 (3) C43---C42---H42 119.8 S5---Ag3---W2 45.48 (2) C42---C43---C44 119.6 (4) S6---Ag3-...
835
2,272
2,768
1,113
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
and Innovation project TEC 2012-32336, and by the Generalitat de Catalunya research support program SGR-1202. This work is also partially supported by the Secretariat for Universities and Research (SUR) and the Ministry of Economy and Knowledge through AGAUR FI-DGR 2012 and BE-DGR 2012 grants (M. M.) [^1]: Marc Manzan...
836
65
1,461
1,232
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
eft( \left( \det {\cal E}_1^{\alpha} \right) \left( \det T_1^{\alpha} \right)^{-1} \right)^{+1/6} \otimes \left( \left( \det {\cal E}_2^{\alpha} \right) \left( \det T_2^{\alpha} \right)^{-1} \right)^{-1/6} ,\end{aligned}$$ and $$\begin{aligned} {\cal F}_+^{\alpha^{-1}} & = & \left( \left( \det {\cal E}_1^{\alpha^{-1}...
837
1,795
1,613
860
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
18 FP4_Bowtie 0.58 0.331 8 0.60 0.356 10 0.330 FP4_MAQ 0.58 0.335 9 0.60 0.361 12 0.334 FP4_Soap2 0.58 0.333 9 0.60 0.357 11 0....
838
2,366
1,632
983
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
isits following RFVTA is presented in Figure [1](#F1){ref-type="fig"}. Of the 135 women satisfying all inclusion criteria and treated at baseline, 11 subjects had interfering circumstances unrelated to the procedure (pregnancy, lack of menses, and Hashimoto's Disease) that could have influenced bleeding assessments pos...
839
1,024
965
1,048
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
erature [@BGMP]. For the comparison we have computed the present flow with the zero-temperature running coupling in Fig. \[fig:alpha\] for all temperatures. This mimics the approximation used in [@Braun:2007bx], which implicitly relies on the zero-temperature running coupling $\alpha_s$. We also remark that the quanti...
840
132
969
838
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
yperparameters), and the small portion was used to train the calibrators. The 3 calibrators trained in the inner 3-folds were used to predict the corresponding test partition, and their predictions were averaged in order to obtain better estimates of their performance with the 7 different metrics (accuracy, Brier score...
841
435
364
527
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
erimental situation shall now be mapped onto the theory derived in the preceding subsection. Though the calculation is straightforward, and similar approaches can be found elsewhere [@stoe02c], it is repeated here for the reader’s convenience. Let us start with the expression of the scattering matrix in terms of Wigner...
842
4,295
649
677
846
0.798998
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
under arbitrary model selection rules without relying on sample splitting. We omit the details. ### Confidence sets for the projection parameters: Normal Approximations {#confidence-sets-for-the-projection-parameters-normal-approximations .unnumbered} We will now derive confidence intervals for the projection parame...
843
2,971
1,262
828
3,618
0.771206
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
ution to in $D$ by $$u(x) =\pi^{-2} \sin(\pi \alpha/2) \int_{D^{\texttt{c}}} \left( \frac{1-|x|^2} {|y|^2-1} \right)^{\alpha/2} \frac{1} {|y-x|^2} \exp(-|x-y|^2) \,{\rm d}y, \qquad x\in D. \label{eq:ana_T4.4}$$ This integral can be computed numerically via a quadrature approximation...
844
1,629
2,720
891
943
0.797096
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
{m,n} \phi^{(0)}_{m-1,n} + \phi^{(1)}_{m+1,n} \phi^{(1)}_{m,n} \phi^{(1)}_{m-1,n}}{1+\phi^{(0)}_{m+1,n}\phi^{(0)}_{m,n} \phi^{(0)}_{m-1,n} + \phi^{(1)}_{m+1,n} \phi^{(1)}_{m,n} \phi^{(1)}_{m-1,n}} . \end{gathered}$$ We also have the master symmetry (\[eq:phi-sys-msym\]), which can be written $$\begin{gathered} \par...
845
1,536
1,258
989
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
N_\phi} \Theta_{ijk} e^{-2\pi \sqrt{-1}jm/N_\phi},$$ and similarly for ${\cal G}$ and $\sigma$. Then, Equation can be cast into a more compact form $$\label{eq:gpot_by_discrete_green_fft} \Theta^m_{ik} = \sum_{i'=0}^{N_R+1}\sum_{k'=0}^{N_z+1}{\cal G}^m_{i,i',k-k'} \sigma^m_{i'k'}{\cal V}_{i'}.$$ Since $\sigma$ is non...
846
2,523
1,435
922
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
ant $C > 0$ such that $$\label{eq:loco.coverage1} \inf_{w_n \in \mathcal{W}_n} \inf_{P \in \mathcal{P}_n^{\mathrm{LOCO}}} \mathbb{P} \left( \gamma_{{\widehat{S}}} \in \widehat{D}_{{\widehat{S}}} \right) \geq 1 - \alpha - C \left( \mathrm{E}_{1,n} + \mathrm{E}_{2,n} \right)- \frac{1}{n},$$ and $$\l...
847
3,928
395
660
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
adding these constraints to the pre- and postcondition, we obtain the following implication. - $\forall M,N \in {{\mathbb{Z}}}: ~M > N, ~N \in Dom_N, ~M \in Dom_M \Longrightarrow $\ $~~~~~~~~~~~M+1>N, ~N \in Dom_N, ~M+1 \in Dom_M$ Representing these domains by symbolic coefficients yields the following implicat...
848
4,182
1,469
536
1,437
0.789577
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
0.340 0.364 0.366 0.356 0.372 mMSE 0.400 0.352 0.384 0.416 0.368 0.356 0.376 BLB($n^{0.6}$) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.002 0.000 0.002 BLB($n^{0.8...
849
5,758
234
361
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
i,L}).\end{aligned}$$ Recall the definition of ${b^{\chi}} $ in Eq. . Let $i\in I$. \(i) Let $m\in {\mathbb{N}}$. The following are equivalent. - $E_i^m=0$ in $U(\chi )$, - $F_i^m=0$ in $U(\chi )$, - $m\ge {b^{\chi}} ({\alpha }_i)$. \(ii) Let ${\Bbbk }[E_i]$ and ${\Bbbk }[F_i]$ be the subalgebras of $U(\chi...
850
2,632
754
826
4,139
0.767822
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
}} , \nabla_a \right]{\bf t}=0, \label{eq:commutation-isometry-covariant}$$ where $\bf t$ can be a scalar, vector, or tensor. To prove Eq. , one can start by showing the commutation relations for $\bf t$ being a 0-form (which follows immediately from Cartan’s magic formula for a 0-form) and a one-form, then use the Lei...
851
3,421
1,729
759
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
O^!}) (\vec X; \varnothing )^{-1}\big)$. This implies equation . As for equation (\[Hi&lt;0\]), we will use an induction that shows that every closed element in $\textbf{D}(\widehat{\mathcal O^!}) (\vec X;\varnothing)^{-r}$, for $r\geq 1$ is also exact. The argument will use an induction which slides all of the “full”...
852
1,674
505
902
567
0.805451
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
N, then you can apply some of the other parsing techniques suggested (use the Java StringTokenizer or the String.split() method as others here have suggested if it's known to be separated only by spaces). That assumes that you can make assumptions (eg. the first element in the resulting array is the firstName,the last...
853
5,032
124
690
428
0.810054
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
gma_Y)$ with $$\Delta = \max_{i,j} | \Sigma_X(j,k) - \Sigma_Y(j,k)|$$ Let $\underline{\sigma}^2 = \max\{ \min_j \Sigma_X(j,j) , \min_j \Sigma_Y(j,j) \}$. Then, there exists a universal constant $C>0$ such that $$\sup_{t \in \mathbb{R}^p} \left| \mathbb{P}( X \leq t) - \mathbb{P}( Y \leq t) \right| \leq C \fra...
854
564
981
904
1,751
0.786026
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
udo data from unsupervised machine translation is especially effective for BWEs because (1) the pseudo data makes the source and target corpora (partially) parallel; (2) the pseudo data reflects some nature of the original language that helps learning similar embedding spaces between the source and target languages.' a...
855
374
467
882
1,469
0.789176
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
he robot’s base. The distance from the mass centre of a link to a joint is denoted as $k_i$ while the joint angle between a link and the base or its preceding link is denoted as $\theta_i$. ![Dual arm robot modelling[]{data-label="fig1"}](model.png){width="0.8\linewidth"} ![Operational motions of dual arm robot[]{dat...
856
4,184
1,292
550
3,113
0.774786
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
ho_x}{df^*\rho_{F(x)}}(\xi) \ , \xi \in \partial X.$$ and let $K_x \subset \partial X$ denote the set where the function $u_x$ achieves its maximum. In [@biswas6], it is shown that for any $x \in X$, there exists a probability measure $\mu_x$ on $\partial X$ with support contained in $K_x$ such that $\mu_x$ is balanced...
857
1,227
1,288
935
1,880
0.784739
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
[08:51:03:206]: Note: 1: 1334 2: FailingFile 3: cab1.cab Error 1334. The file 'FailingFile' cannot be installed because the file cannot be found in cabinet file 'cab1.cab'. This could indicate a network error, an error reading from the CD-ROM, or a problem with this package. MSI (s) (88:54) [08:51:04:317]: Product: M...
858
568
121
383
434
0.809843
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
'[@thornley]' - '[@dpj]' - '[@doherty95]' - '[@lph320]' - '[@shields]' - '[@vanzi]' - '[@vr]' - '[@chad]' - '[@fs-m82]' - '[@lph328]' - '[@seaquist]' - '[@sb]' - '[@chip]' - '[@guseva]' - '[@schmutz]' - '[@lejeune]' - '[@kurtz]' - '[@hanson]' - '[@depree]' - '[@garcia]' - '[@btk]' - '[@thb]' - '[@kj99; @vjc]' - '[@ccm...
859
1,674
2,149
1,123
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
e specific properties of GMAX0505. The structure of GMAX0505 is designed for visible light. In particular, its advanced light pipe structure optimizes the response to visible light as described in Yokoyama et al.[@Yokoyama2018] We applied it for x-ray imaging and polarimetry for the first time. Although Yokoyama et al....
860
47
422
1,005
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
places protoset $G_\heartsuit^{(1)} = \tilde{V}({\mathit{s}}_{\text{crux}})$. For a discussion of protoset $G_\heartsuit^{(n)}$ in context of the Cartesian product, see Appendix §\[D:PROTOSET\]. ### Partial order {#S:CONE_ORDER} Membership in a converse iterative operator induces a partial ordering: Let ${\mathbb{...
861
1,345
1,463
974
1,858
0.784994
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
$. So far, we do not have uniform description for $\rho_{{\mbox{\boldmath $\alpha$}}}(s_i)$. So we define $\rho_{{\mbox{\boldmath $\alpha$}}}(s_1)$ and $\rho_{{\mbox{\boldmath $\alpha$}}}(s_2)$ one by one. First we define $\rho_{{\mbox{\boldmath $\alpha$}}}(s_1)$. For tableaux $p_1$ and $p_2$ of $\mathbb{T}({\mbox{\bo...
862
1,872
1,760
963
1,890
0.784663
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
ec(%)** **F1(%)** **T(ms)** **Pre(%)** **Rec(%)** **F1(%)** **T(ms)** **Pre(%)** **Rec(%)** **F1(%)** **T(ms)** **Pre(%)** **Rec(%)** **F1(%)** **T(ms)** **SDD-R** 89.51 48.75 63.12 266.77 21.97 **99.38** 35.98 11.12 6.67 ...
863
3,190
838
684
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
--C37 119.0 (4) S7---W2---Ag4 60.14 (3) C33---C32---P5 118.1 (3) S5---W2---Ag4 56.25 (3) C37---C32---P5 122.8 (3) S8---W2---Ag3 112.82 (4) C32---C33---C34 120.8 (4) S6---W2---Ag3 58.26 (3) C32---C33---H33 119.6 S7---W2---Ag3 137.85 (3) C34-...
864
3,963
2,119
862
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
$D(i,j)$ is the rate of hopping attempts from site $i$ to $j$ and depend on the investigated model. The sum runs over all $N$ pairs of nearest-neighbors of the lattice. Let $n_i$ be the number of lateral bonds of site $i$ and $n^\text{max}_i$ the largest number of bonds among the nearest-neighbors of $i$. For the WV mo...
865
532
770
1,060
3,120
0.774733
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
right|&\ge\frac{|AH|}{|X_1|\cdots|X_\ell|}\\ &\ge\frac{|AH|}{\exp(e^{O(s)}\log^{O(1)}2K)^\ell}\\ &\ge\frac{|AH|}{\exp(e^{O(s^2)}\log^{O(s)}2K)}.\end{aligned}$$ In particular, setting $Q_i=\{u_i^{-1},1,u_i\}$ for $i=1,\ldots,\ell$, we have $$\left|H\prod\{P_1,\ldots,P_k,Q_1,\ldots,Q_\ell\}\right|\ge\frac{|AH|}{\...
866
245
820
937
2,068
0.783067
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
. (). . . , , & (). , [ ** ]{}, . , , , & (). . , [ ** ]{}, . , , , , , , , , , & (). . , [ ** ]{}, . (). . , [ ** ]{}, . , , , , & (). . , [ ** ]{}, . (). . , [**]{}, . , & (). . , [**]{}, . , & (). . , [ ** ]{}, . , & (). . , [**]{}, . , & (). . , [ ** ]{}, . , , , & (). . , [ ** ]{}, . , , , , , , , & (). . , [ ** ]...
867
2
2,481
971
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------...
868
3,148
1,796
940
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
P0C0L4 Complement C4-A 2219.29 76.26 192.7 7.08 P00734 Prothrombin 2011.89 71.54 70.0 5.90 P19823 Inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain H2 1452.50 55.81 106.4 6.86 P19827 Inter-...
869
4,438
709
572
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
ing filtration with 11 μm filter. Accession Description Score Coverage MW \[kDa\] calc. pI ----------- ---------------------------------------------- --------- ---------- ------------ ---------- P00734 Prothrombin 2458.17 67.2...
870
5,153
262
284
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
ition of the relationship between cause and effect in combination with the small number of included subjects. Also, the measurement of other markers of oxidative stress was unavailable. V.R.: research plan, statistics, data collection and manuscript writing; V.K.: hemodynamic measurements and Echo-cardiographical asse...
871
887
1,697
990
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
(\lambda_{m} -\lambda_{k} ) }, \label{S-alpha-beta-0th-final}\end{aligned}$$ and the oscillation probability by $P(\nu_\beta \rightarrow \nu_\alpha) = \vert S_{\alpha \beta}^{(0)} \vert^2$. Finally, armed with the solution , we can also calculate all higher order terms in oscillation probability for e.g. those in eq....
872
438
1,557
1,004
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
ow a surface abundance about 0.2 - 0.3 dex lower than the predicted one. A possible way to improve the agreement with these stars is to adopt an initial lithium abundance of about $\epsilon_\mathrm{Li} \approx 3$. However, this method does not improve the agreement with the low-mass stars, a problem still largely discu...
873
446
400
861
1,567
0.788182
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
elta_{K} - h_{i} ) (\Delta_{L} - h_{i} ) ( h_{j} - h_{i} )^2 } e^{- i h_{i} x} \nonumber \\ &-& \frac{ 1 }{ (\Delta_{K} - h_{j} )^2 (\Delta_{L} - h_{j} )^2 ( h_{j} - h_{i} )^2 } \biggl\{ 3 h_{j}^2 - 2 h_{i} h_{j} - \left( 2 h_{j} - h_{i} \right) (\Delta_{K} + \Delta_{L} ) + \Delta_{K} \Delta_{L} \biggr\} e^{- i ...
874
302
1,440
999
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
---- T~0~ WT 1 47 \*^1^ 4: 100 0 60.0 T~0~ 1 71 \*^1^ 4: 100 100 ...
875
4,592
921
411
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
Q: Reusing react components across projects I want to split my web project into three: front-end, back-end and super-admin. What is the best way to re-use the components across code bases? Npm packages? That seems hard to maintain: Open component dev package Make changes Push changes Tag version Update all projects ...
876
1,425
357
833
2,137
0.782452
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
Usually one uses weighted or toric blow-ups with smooth center as a tool for finding embedded $\Q$-resolutions. Here we will briefly discuss weighted blow-ups in the surface case $\pi: \widehat{X} \to X$ at a point $P\in X=\frac{1}{d}(p,q)$ with respect to $w = (a,b)$. Consider $$\hat X:=\{((x,y),[u:v]_w)\in \CC^2\tim...
877
358
886
863
2,691
0.777837
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
\nonumber \\ S_{Sa} &=& \left( Z X \right) \hat{S}_{aa} (U X)^{\dagger} + \left( Z X \right) \hat{S}_{aS} W^{\dagger} + V \hat{S}_{Sa} (U X)^{\dagger} + V \hat{S}_{SS} W^{\dagger}, \nonumber \\ S_{SS} &=& \left( Z X \right) \hat{S}_{aa} \left( Z X \right)^{\dagger} + \left( Z X \right) \hat{S}_{aS} V^{\dagger} + ...
878
3,855
382
680
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
ch that for every $\kappa \in {\mathbb{R}}$, $p>1$ and $f\in W^{q,k,p}({\mathbb{R}}^{d})$, $$\underline{C}_{q}\Vert \psi _{\kappa }|f|_{q}\Vert _{p}\leq \Vert f\Vert _{q,\kappa ,p}\leq \overline{C}_{q}\Vert \psi _{\kappa }|f|_{q}\Vert _{p}; \label{NOT4a}$$ - for every $q\in {\mathbb{N}}$ and $p>1$ there exis...
879
517
1,044
976
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
where $\vartheta$ denotes the normalized spatial angle. The normalized spatial angle is related to the physical AOA or AOD $\theta\in\left[-\pi/2,\pi/2\right]$ by $ \vartheta={d\sin(\theta)}/{\lambda}, $ where $d$ denotes the antenna spacing and $\lambda$ denotes the wavelength. We assume that $N_{1,{\mathrm{cl}}}=...
880
3,665
1,299
894
1,900
0.784593
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
P-value log~2~ (fold-change) ----------- ------------- ---------------------- FABP4 0.001621719 −2.100023748 CMAHP 0.024414059 −1.066127776 ITM2A 0.016922069 −1.060957028 CA4 0.003105875 −1.030691864 FAM189A2 0.001993414 −1.000814956 MPPED2 0.007206792 ...
881
1,841
751
979
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
)|<\epsilon$ if $O$ is small and $|\lambda-\lambda_i|\leq \delta$. This means that, up to a point $\lambda=\lambda_i+\delta'$ with $\delta'<\delta$, the value of $\theta_\Lambda(\lambda)$ does not explode. Choose $\lambda_i<\lambda_1<\lambda_i+\delta'$, then $\lambda_e+\Delta\lambda_e>\lambda_1$ for all the curves para...
882
285
883
994
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
e{k}_{i+2, i})_2^2+ (\tilde{k}_{i+2, i})_1\cdot (\tilde{k}_{i+2, i})_1'\right) & \quad \textit{if $L_{i+2}$ is of type $I^e$} \end{array}\right.\\ + \left(\delta_{i-3}'(\tilde{k}_{i-3, i})_1^2+ \delta_{i+3}'(\tilde{k}_{i+3, i})_1^2\right)+ \left(\delta_{i-4}(\tilde{k}_{i-4, i})_1^2+ \delta_{i+4}(\tilde{...
883
3,918
783
557
2,237
0.781511
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
we add the constraint on the maximum of the coefficients. General $\ell_1$ minimization problem to promote sparsity {#l1} --------------------------------------------------------- In addition to the number of connected components, we assume that we know one representative of each component i.e. a node belonging to t...
884
2,235
1,610
859
3,155
0.77444
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
ome new data, which supports our earlier findings. The paper is organized as follows. Section \[sec:intro\] introduces notations. Section \[sec:value\] shows that the distribution of traded volume/value is not universal, and it is not in the Levy stable regime as suggested by Ref. [@gopi.volume]. Section \[sec:correl\...
885
234
998
741
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
mas está desse jeito. Assim que o app é iniciado, ele verifica a permissão chamando a classe Permissao. Se o usuário aceitar, o app inicia e se ele recusar o app fechar com uma mensagem informando que é preciso aceitar as permissões. Até ai tudo bem, porém se ele aceitar a permissão o app só funciona se ele fechar e ab...
886
872
140
332
3,032
0.775327
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
round 6 and 7 MeV are consistent between the two calculations. The energy-weighted sum ($1.867\times10^{4}$MeV$\cdot$fm$^{4}$) overestimates by about 13.9% the EWSR value ($1.638\times 10^{4}$MeV$\cdot$fm$^{4}$). The overshooting of the EWSR for the isoscalar quadrupole mode in the LM approximation was pointed out in R...
887
668
1,422
985
1,694
0.786718
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
t. Standard tools {#sec:prelim} ============== In this section we record various standard results relating to sets of small doubling and approximate groups. This material is likely to be familiar to experts in the subject, who may therefore decide to skip straight to \[sec:details\]. \[lem:slicing\] Let $K,L\ge1$ an...
888
932
1,061
885
3,866
0.769633
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
)\right]\;. \nonumber\\\end{aligned}$$ The process of relaxation from the initial state can be followed by monitoring the subsystem observables $\hat{\sigma_z}$, which in the adiabatic basis reads $$\mbox{\boldmath$\sigma$}_z=\frac{1}{1+G^2}\left( \begin{array}{cc} 2G & 1-G^2 \\ 1-G^2 & -2G\end{array}\right)\;.$$ The ...
889
1,020
1,350
1,000
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
fferent typically by $3-4$ orders of magnitude, we increase the radial cell size $\Delta r$ with the fixed size ratio $\Delta r_i/\Delta r_{i-1}$ $(>1)$. We set $\Delta r_1 = 0.1 R_{\mathrm{in}}$ at the inner boundary. The grids in the angular direction are homogeneously distributed over $0<\theta<90^\circ$, and thus t...
890
1,139
1,581
917
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
ls. However, a difference in estimated firing behavior occurs at the 120mN response level whereby the SMC-MUNE procedure obtained two different model fits; MU1+MU4 in R10 and MU2+MU3 in R50. As a consequence, the estimated excitation range for MU1 in R50 is unusually large, leading to a relatively flat excitability cur...
891
1,819
1,432
1,104
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
\- A/C 31 (56.4) 39 (52.7)   1.19 (0.57, 2.49) A/C 39 (52.0) 5 (41.7)   2.02 (0.58, 7.05) C/C 20 (36.3) 30 (40.5) 0.8905 1 C/C 27 (36.0) 7 (58.3) 0.2255 1 A/A + A/C ...
892
4,580
517
471
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
two closely spaced peaks: $\mathrm{F}_1=3055.1$, $\mathrm{F}_2=3258.4$, $\mathrm{F}_3=3284.1$ and $\mathrm{F}_4=4780.6\,\mu$Hz. Similarly to the case of G 207-9, no further results of time series photometric observations have been published up to now. ### Konkoly observations {#sect:lp133freq} We found four recurrin...
893
927
2,986
1,086
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
*r + r - 159. Give j(m(h)). -26*h Let y(a) = -3*a**2 - 19*a - 910. Let d(s) = s**2 + 6*s + 303. Let x(i) = -19*d(i) - 6*y(i). Let p(h) = 3*h**2. What is p(x(u))? 3*u**4 + 1782*u**2 + 264627 Let u(g) = -2*g**2. Let r be (-138)/(-8) - ((-7)/4 + 2). Let t(d) = 57*d**2 - 43 + 19*d + 43 - r*d. Give u(t(m)). -6498*m**4 - 456...
894
105
464
942
null
null
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
maly probability, SDD-R can be also optimized by ranking all data collections according to their divergence value and select first $n \cdot \alpha$ ones with highest values as anomalies. Evaluation {#sec:evaluation} ========== Our algorithm was implemented and interpreted in Python 3.5.2. All experiments were tested ...
895
355
889
930
1,353
0.790567
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
result in this article. \[uppercondition\] For an upper subsemigroup $S$ of $\mathcal{B}$, the following are equivalent: $(i)$ $S$ is a left I-order in $\mathcal{B}$; $(ii)$ $R_1 \subseteq S$. Moreover, writing $S$ as $S=F_{D}\cup\bigcup_{i\in I} S_{i}$, we have $R_1 \subseteq S$ if and only if $0\in I, \ d=1$ and...
896
1,307
685
1,019
3,836
0.769777
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
density $\mu_0$, we find: $$\label{eqmu0} || (P^t)^n\mu_0 - \mu_\text{stat}|| \propto (\lambda(P))^n.$$ According to Eqs. (\[eqdn\]) and (\[eq:mix1\]), $\lambda(P)^{t(\epsilon)} \propto \epsilon$, i.e. $\lambda(P) \propto \epsilon^{1/t(\epsilon)}$. Hence, the smaller $\lambda(P)$ the shorter the mixing time (Fig. \[...
897
1,015
1,569
954
2,622
0.778349
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
a}-G_{ac}\frac{1}{1+i\lambda_T G_{cc}}i\lambda_T G_{ca}\,,$$ where $G_{nm}=W^\dag_n G W_m$ and $\lambda_T$ is the coupling constant of the “terminator,” $$\label{eq:s08} \lambda_T=\frac{1-r}{1+r}=\tanh\frac{\alpha+i\phi}{2}\,.$$ Equation (\[eq:s06\]) has the same form as Eq. (\[eq:s05\]), but for the measuring ant...
898
3,249
1,799
934
2,079
0.782958
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
Mills theory [@Litim:1998nf; @Pawlowski:2005xe] in Polyakov gauge, $$\begin{aligned} \nonumber \hspace{-.5cm} \partial_t \Gamma_{k}& = & \frac{\beta}{2} \int \0{d^3 p}{(2 \pi)^3} \left(\frac{1}{\Gamma_k^{(2)} + R_A}\right)_{00}\partial_t R_{0,k}\\ & & + \frac{T}{2} \sum_{n\in \Z} \int \0{d^3 p}{(2 ...
899
2,441
1,247
836
2,353
0.780628
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg
erational profile (of collection $Z$) is $$P(Z) = \lim_{\;k \to \infty} \frac{N_Z(\{{\mathit{s}}_n\}, k)}{k}.$$ ### Conversion into a rate {#S:ABSOLUTE_OP_PROFILE_RATE} Section \[S:INTRO\_REACTIVE\] mentions the synchronization function, a cross-reference between discrete and real time. During each step, an amount of...
900
2,906
2,481
978
1,333
0.79083
github_plus_top10pct_by_avg