Link dataset to paper and update metadata

#2
by nielsr HF Staff - opened
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +19 -15
README.md CHANGED
@@ -1,4 +1,13 @@
1
  ---
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2
  dataset_info:
3
  features:
4
  - name: task_id
@@ -6,7 +15,7 @@ dataset_info:
6
  - name: X
7
  list:
8
  list: float32
9
- - name: 'y'
10
  list: float32
11
  - name: n_features
12
  dtype: int32
@@ -104,25 +113,20 @@ configs:
104
  path: data/f60-*
105
  - split: f80
106
  path: data/f80-*
107
- license: mit
108
- task_categories:
109
- - tabular-regression
110
- size_categories:
111
- - 100K<n<1M
112
  ---
113
 
114
  ## SCM3K
115
 
116
- Benchmark dataset for:
117
 
118
- > **The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Markov Boundary for Tabular Prediction**
119
- > Shu Wan, Abhinav Gorantla, Huan Liu, K. Selcuk Candan
120
 
121
- 3 450 tabular prediction tasks sampled from random structural causal
122
- models (SCMs), totalling 3.45M records (1 000 samples per task).
123
  Each task ships with the ground-truth Markov boundary of the target
124
  node, so you can evaluate feature selection and prediction under
125
- known causal structure. Nine feature-count levels from 40 to 1 000.
126
 
127
  ### Splits
128
 
@@ -140,7 +144,7 @@ partition — use HF slice syntax (e.g. `split="f200[:80%]"`).
140
  | f600 | 600 | 601 | ER `[0.01, 0.02, 0.04]` | `[0.05, 0.95]` | 450 |
141
  | f800 | 800 | 801 | ER `[0.01, 0.02, 0.04]` | `[0.05, 0.95]` | 450 |
142
  | f1000 | 1000 | 1001 | ER `[0.01, 0.02, 0.04]` | `[0.05, 0.95]` | 450 |
143
- | | | | | **Total** | **3 450** |
144
 
145
  ### Row schema
146
 
@@ -149,8 +153,8 @@ Each row is one prediction task.
149
  | Field | Type | What it stores |
150
  |-------|------|----------------|
151
  | `task_id` | string | unique task identifier |
152
- | `X` | list\<list\<f32\>\> | feature matrix, 1 000 x F |
153
- | `y` | list\<f32\> | target vector, length 1 000 |
154
  | `n_features` | int | number of features (= F) |
155
  | `mb_mask` | list\<bool\> | true Markov boundary mask over features |
156
  | `mb_ratio` | float | fraction of features in the Markov boundary |
 
1
  ---
2
+ license: mit
3
+ size_categories:
4
+ - 1M<n<10M
5
+ task_categories:
6
+ - tabular-regression
7
+ tags:
8
+ - causal-discovery
9
+ - markov-boundary
10
+ - causal-inference
11
  dataset_info:
12
  features:
13
  - name: task_id
 
15
  - name: X
16
  list:
17
  list: float32
18
+ - name: y
19
  list: float32
20
  - name: n_features
21
  dtype: int32
 
113
  path: data/f60-*
114
  - split: f80
115
  path: data/f80-*
 
 
 
 
 
116
  ---
117
 
118
  ## SCM3K
119
 
120
+ Benchmark dataset for the paper:
121
 
122
+ > **[The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Markov Boundary for Tabular Prediction](https://huggingface.co/papers/2605.29411)**
123
+ > [Shu Wan](https://huggingface.co/Shuwan), Abhinav Gorantla, Huan Liu, K. Selçuk Candan
124
 
125
+ 3,450 tabular prediction tasks sampled from random structural causal
126
+ models (SCMs), totalling 3.45M records (1,000 samples per task).
127
  Each task ships with the ground-truth Markov boundary of the target
128
  node, so you can evaluate feature selection and prediction under
129
+ known causal structure. Nine feature-count levels from 40 to 1,000.
130
 
131
  ### Splits
132
 
 
144
  | f600 | 600 | 601 | ER `[0.01, 0.02, 0.04]` | `[0.05, 0.95]` | 450 |
145
  | f800 | 800 | 801 | ER `[0.01, 0.02, 0.04]` | `[0.05, 0.95]` | 450 |
146
  | f1000 | 1000 | 1001 | ER `[0.01, 0.02, 0.04]` | `[0.05, 0.95]` | 450 |
147
+ | | | | | **Total** | **3,450** |
148
 
149
  ### Row schema
150
 
 
153
  | Field | Type | What it stores |
154
  |-------|------|----------------|
155
  | `task_id` | string | unique task identifier |
156
+ | `X` | list\<list\<f32\>\> | feature matrix, 1,000 x F |
157
+ | `y` | list\<f32\> | target vector, length 1,000 |
158
  | `n_features` | int | number of features (= F) |
159
  | `mb_mask` | list\<bool\> | true Markov boundary mask over features |
160
  | `mb_ratio` | float | fraction of features in the Markov boundary |