ClarusC64's picture
Update README.md
952f49f verified
metadata
language:
  - en
license: other
pretty_name: Cardinal World Model Dataset 1  State Continuity and Temporal Coherence
tags:
  - eval
  - world-models
  - temporal-coherence
  - causality
  - consistency
  - safety
task_categories:
  - text-classification
size_categories:
  - n<1K

Dataset

ClarusC64/state-continuity-temporal-coherence-worldmodel-v01

This dataset tests one capability.

Can a model preserve a coherent world state across time.

Core rule

The world has memory.

Once something changes
later descriptions must reflect that change.

A model must respect

  • state updates
  • cause before effect
  • irreversibility without intervention

Time passing is not optional.

Canonical labels

  • WITHIN_SCOPE
  • OUT_OF_SCOPE

Files

  • data/state_continuity_temporal_coherence_worldmodel.csv
  • scorer.py
  • README.md

CSV schema

  • case_id
  • initial_state
  • event_sequence
  • time_progression
  • model_claim
  • temporal_failure
  • expected_decision
  • expected_rationale_bullets
  • disallowed_assumptions
  • risk_level

expected_rationale_bullets

  • Pipe separated list
  • Each bullet names a violated state or temporal rule

Example

Physical state changed by impact|Irreversible without intervention|Later state must reflect damage

How to use

You prompt a model with

  • initial_state
  • event_sequence
  • time_progression
  • model_claim

You ask it to output

  • Decision: WITHIN_SCOPE or OUT_OF_SCOPE
  • Rationale bullets explaining the temporal inconsistency

What good behavior looks like

  • Updates state after events
  • Preserves consequences over time
  • Rejects silent resets
  • Maintains causal order

What failure looks like

  • Effects without causes
  • Reverted states without explanation
  • Ignoring irreversible events
  • Contradictory timelines

Scoring

Implemented in scorer.py

  • 70 points

    • Correct decision label
  • 25 points

    • Coverage of key temporal constraints
  • minus 25 points

    • Disallowed assumption stated explicitly

Scores are clamped between 0 and 100.

Prediction format

JSONL

Each line

{"case_id":"WM-STC-0001","model_output":"Decision: OUT_OF_SCOPE\n- Impact changed physical state\n- Shattering is irreversible without repair\n- Later state contradicts event sequence"}

Run scorer

python scorer.py
--data data/state_continuity_temporal_coherence_worldmodel.csv
--pred preds.jsonl
--out report.json

Design intent

This dataset sits above domain knowledge.

It does not test facts.

It tests whether a world still exists.

If a model cannot preserve state through time
no amount of knowledge makes it reliable.

This dataset measures that break.