CleverShovel/Mistral-7B-v0.1-paper-reviews-lora
Updated • 10
Datasets:
instruction stringclasses 1
value | input stringlengths 53 283 | output stringlengths 92 42.8k |
|---|---|---|
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: GENE ONTOLOGY CAPSULE GAN: AN IMPROVED ARCHITECTURE FOR PROTEIN FUNCTION PREDICTION
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: The manuscript has been studied thoroughly and some recommendations for the authors are suggested , which are listed below:
1. In Figure 2, the author mentions a 9*9 input sequence in the detail design of the capsule network; nevertheless, the protein sequence is just one dimension. Please clarify th... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: GENE ONTOLOGY CAPSULE GAN: AN IMPROVED ARCHITECTURE FOR PROTEIN FUNCTION PREDICTION
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: The paper is self-contained and is written very well.
Experimental design: The work is an extension of authors original work published earlier. The research questions are well defined and the proposed framework is described with sufficient details.
Validity of the findings: Numerous experiments are car... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: GENE ONTOLOGY CAPSULE GAN: AN IMPROVED ARCHITECTURE FOR PROTEIN FUNCTION PREDICTION
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 3 | Basic reporting: Authors have researched and written GOCAPGAN articles whose primary objective is to predict protein functions using GANs. They have used residual blocks, standard CNN, and capsule networks in the GANs. The improved technique works better in results and the number of classes. The reviews of each section... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: GENE ONTOLOGY CAPSULE GAN: AN IMPROVED ARCHITECTURE FOR PROTEIN FUNCTION PREDICTION
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: The article is written in English and is clear, unambiguous, technically correct text. The article conforms to professional standards of courtesy and expression.
The article has sufficient introduction and background to demonstrate how the work fits into the broader field of knowledge. Relevant prior... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: GENE ONTOLOGY CAPSULE GAN: AN IMPROVED ARCHITECTURE FOR PROTEIN FUNCTION PREDICTION
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: The authors have addressed all of my concerns. I have no further comments.
Experimental design: Research questions are well defined and rigorous investigation has been performed.
Validity of the findings: Results are validated on publicly available datasets. Code and datasets are provided on the GitHub... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: GENE ONTOLOGY CAPSULE GAN: AN IMPROVED ARCHITECTURE FOR PROTEIN FUNCTION PREDICTION
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 3 | Basic reporting: I am happy with the comments of round 1 being incorporated. The manuscript is relevant to the journal scope and has significant contributions—no further suggestion from my side. Therefore, I propose to accept it.
Experimental design: Comments of round 1 are incorporated—no further changes are required ... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A GENETIC ALGORITHM-BASED ENERGY-AWARE MULTI-HOP CLUSTERING SCHEME FOR HETEROGENEOUS WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: This paper proposes a genetic algorithm-based energyaware multi-hop clustering (GA-EMC) scheme for heterogeneous WSNs (HWSNs). In HWSNs, all the nodes have varying initial energy and typically have an energy consumption restriction. A genetic algorithm determines the optimal CHs and their positions in ... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A GENETIC ALGORITHM-BASED ENERGY-AWARE MULTI-HOP CLUSTERING SCHEME FOR HETEROGENEOUS WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: In this paper, a genetic algorithm-based energy-aware multi-hop clustering (GA-EMC) scheme for heterogeneous WSNs (HWSNs) is proposed. Genetic algorithm determines the optimal CHs and their positions in the network. The fitness of chromosomes is calculated in terms of distance, optimal CHs, and the nod... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A GENETIC ALGORITHM-BASED ENERGY-AWARE MULTI-HOP CLUSTERING SCHEME FOR HETEROGENEOUS WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 3 | Basic reporting: Overall the paper is well-presented and clearly written in professional, unambiguous language. The topic has much significance. The novelty of the work and the contributions are clearly reported. I commend the authors for their technical correctness, extensive experimentation, and analysis. The perform... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A GENETIC ALGORITHM-BASED ENERGY-AWARE MULTI-HOP CLUSTERING SCHEME FOR HETEROGENEOUS WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: The authors have addressed my concern and it can be accepted now.
Experimental design: The authors have addressed my concern and it can be accepted now.
Validity of the findings: The authors have addressed my concern and it can be accepted now.
Additional comments: The authors have addressed my concern... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A GENETIC ALGORITHM-BASED ENERGY-AWARE MULTI-HOP CLUSTERING SCHEME FOR HETEROGENEOUS WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: This manuscript is good writing.
Experimental design: Good.
Validity of the findings: The proposed algorithm is enough innovative.
Additional comments: I agree the responds from authors. |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A GENETIC ALGORITHM-BASED ENERGY-AWARE MULTI-HOP CLUSTERING SCHEME FOR HETEROGENEOUS WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 3 | Basic reporting: This revised paper is much better now. But it needs major revision due to the following reasons.
1. Please strictly follow this journal template, like alignment, section number etc.
2. Please cite reference papers with increasing references order.
3. In the related works part, it is not suggested... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A NOVEL AUTOENCODER APPROACH TO FEATURE EXTRACTION WITH LINEAR SEPARABILITY FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL DATA
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: This work presents a novel method for feature extraction based on Mahalanobis distance defined by the covariance matrix between features. Some comments:
- Abstract should be more clear
- Separation of graphics from the sequence of the text makes it more difficult to read.
- Highlight all assumptions... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A NOVEL AUTOENCODER APPROACH TO FEATURE EXTRACTION WITH LINEAR SEPARABILITY FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL DATA
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: no comment
Experimental design: The experimental design of the authors can be accepted.
Validity of the findings: The findings demonstrated by the authors are very interesting. Especiallly, distance metric-based methods are more suitable for extracting those features with linear separabilities from hig... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: SOME METAHEURISTIC ALGORITHMS FOR SOLVING MULTIPLE CROSS-FUNCTIONAL TEAM SELECTION PROBLEMS
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: The highlighted Manuscript is a fair contribution for publication but requires minor improvement init
Experimental design: In the abstract, clearly highlight the computational cost section either it time of execution or memory allocation
In the proposed optimization model section, the proposed al... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: SOME METAHEURISTIC ALGORITHMS FOR SOLVING MULTIPLE CROSS-FUNCTIONAL TEAM SELECTION PROBLEMS
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: This paper concerns Some Metaheuristic Algorithms for Multiple Cross Functional Teams Selection Problem. We designed metaheuristic algorithms to solve the proposed model, including genetic algorithm (GA) and ant colony optimization (ACO). The authors also compare the developed algorithms with the MIQP-... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: SOME METAHEURISTIC ALGORITHMS FOR SOLVING MULTIPLE CROSS-FUNCTIONAL TEAM SELECTION PROBLEMS
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: The manuscript under the title " Some Metaheuristic Algorithms for Multiple Cross-Functional Teams Selection Problem" seems a mature contribution. However, some minor concerns still exist in revised version. Furthermore, grammatical ambiguities exist in the revised version.
Experimental design: 1. I... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: SOME METAHEURISTIC ALGORITHMS FOR SOLVING MULTIPLE CROSS-FUNCTIONAL TEAM SELECTION PROBLEMS
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: The authors revised all comments well. I think that the work can be published.
Experimental design: All experiments are conducted well.
Validity of the findings: no comment
Additional comments: No additional comments |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: SOME METAHEURISTIC ALGORITHMS FOR SOLVING MULTIPLE CROSS-FUNCTIONAL TEAM SELECTION PROBLEMS
Review round: 3
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: The revised manuscript under title " Some Metaheuristic Algorithms for Multiple Cross-Functional Teams Selection Problem" seems good in shape. Authors properly response all the highlighted concern . However, the computational complexity requires slightly improvement for final version of the paper. Pl... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: NINE BEST PRACTICES FOR RESEARCH SOFTWARE REGISTRIES AND REPOSITORIES
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: The paper is generally well-written and easy to follow.
In terms of literature references, some relevant software archives are not cited, for example, swMATH at https://swmath.org/ , main reference:
Greuel, Gert-Martin, and Wolfram Sperber. "swMATH–an information service for mathematical software... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: NINE BEST PRACTICES FOR RESEARCH SOFTWARE REGISTRIES AND REPOSITORIES
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: no comment
Experimental design: no comment
Validity of the findings: no comment
Additional comments: I really appreciate the efforts by the Task Force of FORCE11 SCIWG to come up with the nine best practices for researching software registries and repositories, as well as the clear, well-structured rep... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: NINE BEST PRACTICES FOR RESEARCH SOFTWARE REGISTRIES AND REPOSITORIES
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: no comment
Experimental design: no comment
Validity of the findings: no comment
Additional comments: I would like to first commend the authors' efforts in addressing the reviewers' questions in detail and revising their manuscript accordingly. While I'm overall satisfied with the revision, if I had to ... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: NINE BEST PRACTICES FOR RESEARCH SOFTWARE REGISTRIES AND REPOSITORIES
Review round: 3
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: As a general comment for the authors and editors, there seems to be a process failure here. I have reviewed v0 of this paper and I'm not reviewing v2. There seem to have been a v1 in between, which I have not reviewed. As a consequence of that I have seen neither the tracked changes between v0 and v1, ... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: NINE BEST PRACTICES FOR RESEARCH SOFTWARE REGISTRIES AND REPOSITORIES
Review round: 3
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: no comment
Experimental design: no comment
Validity of the findings: no comment
Additional comments: I noticed that the time of the inaugural Task Force meeting (February 2019) is different from the date shown in the Table 1 caption (November 2019). I was wondering if this was a random mistake or if th... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: DATA AUGMENTATION AND DEEP NEURAL NETWORKS FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF PAKISTANI RACIAL SPEAKERS RECOGNITION
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: In this study, the authors present a data augmentation method that shifts the pitch, uses multiple window sizes, stretches the time, and adds white noise to the original audio.
The presented subject is undoubtedly attractive. Just the presented study might be somewhat weak in innovation. Frankly, th... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: DATA AUGMENTATION AND DEEP NEURAL NETWORKS FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF PAKISTANI RACIAL SPEAKERS RECOGNITION
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: The paper addresses an interesting problem of Speech Emotion Recognition. Leveraging Deep Neural Networks, it proposes a technique to classify multiple Urdu language accent speakers. While the evaluation and analysis of the proposal show promising results, the language and structure (elaborated in **Ad... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: CAUSAL GRAPH EXTRACTION FROM NEWS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TIME-SERIES CAUSALITY LEARNING TECHNIQUES
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: A good article which presents a novel framework for extracting causal graphs from digital text media that are selected from a domain under analysis by applying specially developed information retrieval and natural language processing methods. The framework is applied to the New York Times dataset, whic... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: CAUSAL GRAPH EXTRACTION FROM NEWS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TIME-SERIES CAUSALITY LEARNING TECHNIQUES
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: The paper presents a framework for extracting causal graphs from digital text media. It consist of 8 steps that goes from analyzing the text of news to filter topical-relevant sentences, discover events and construct time series to learn a causal structure among variables. The framework is a valuable c... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: CAUSAL GRAPH EXTRACTION FROM NEWS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TIME-SERIES CAUSALITY LEARNING TECHNIQUES
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: Looking good now.
Experimental design: Ok.
Validity of the findings: Fine.
Additional comments: 12 questions were raised related to basic reporting. In the revision, most of them are addressed. I think, document is good to go now. |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: CAUSAL GRAPH EXTRACTION FROM NEWS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TIME-SERIES CAUSALITY LEARNING TECHNIQUES
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: The paper presents a framework for extracting causal graphs from digital text media, considering the analysis of big volumes of text. The contribution is interesting and the resulting framework provides a good starting point for experimentation with causal learning from social media.
The revised vers... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: MOBILE PHONE ENABLED MENTAL HEALTH MONITORING TO ENHANCE DIAGNOSIS FOR SEVERITY ASSESSMENT OF BEHAVIOURS: A REVIEW
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: The article meets the appropriate standards. Extensive references, the writing is clear and tables and figures are adequate.
Experimental design: The study design is correct. But it is necessary to explain in more detail the selection criteria of the chosen literature. It should also go deeper into the... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: MOBILE PHONE ENABLED MENTAL HEALTH MONITORING TO ENHANCE DIAGNOSIS FOR SEVERITY ASSESSMENT OF BEHAVIOURS: A REVIEW
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: 1. Literature in the field of public health has moved away from using the term “mental disorder” and towards “mental health issues” to avoid stigmatizing those affected. I would recommend adapting this language (e.g., in the abstract).
2. Kindly review the full manuscript for grammatical errors and se... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: MOBILE PHONE ENABLED MENTAL HEALTH MONITORING TO ENHANCE DIAGNOSIS FOR SEVERITY ASSESSMENT OF BEHAVIOURS: A REVIEW
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: What doe it mean by the statement at lines 93-94 and a number of research articles selected from the various databases to “fine” the research work. Please carefully read the article and remove these major mistakes.
Table 1 seems to be ambiguous, can you elaborate on how this table has been formed?
Yo... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: MOBILE PHONE ENABLED MENTAL HEALTH MONITORING TO ENHANCE DIAGNOSIS FOR SEVERITY ASSESSMENT OF BEHAVIOURS: A REVIEW
Review round: 3
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: the author have made no change in Table1 , as track version and updated version is not showing at least. my question was to make it clear, they wrote in rebuttal but makes no changes in the actual table
???Thanks for your comments. We used search queries to retrieve 6 databases. Figure 1 depicts the ... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: IS GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE A CONFLUENCE OF CULTURE? EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM SOCIAL MEDIA
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: The topic of research is really interesting. But I found a few lacking in the paper.
Experimental design: The author didn't mention the flow chart of the proposed work. Proposed work must explain step by step according to the flow chart.
Secondly, What is the novelty of this work
Third, whether this ... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: IS GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE A CONFLUENCE OF CULTURE? EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM SOCIAL MEDIA
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: Paper is clear and understandable. Format and structure of the manuscript is very clear.
Experimental design: Experimental methodology is discussed very clearly. No need for any updation.
Validity of the findings: Novelty exist in the paper, which impact to the credibility of the author.
Additional com... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: IS GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE A CONFLUENCE OF CULTURE? EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM SOCIAL MEDIA
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 3 | Basic reporting: 1. Authors are required to improve the English language and some sentence structures need to be updated.
2 In some sections authors have written too many paragraphs for expressing their views. Need to update the style with some professional writing style.
3 Provide expanded from of abbreviations wher... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: IS GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE A CONFLUENCE OF CULTURE? EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM SOCIAL MEDIA
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: 1.Given header keywords in Table 1, together with any heading, and all table perimeter names.
2. Authors have improved the language.
3. References have been updated to include some more recently published work.
Figures are OK.
Experimental design: The authors have carried out the various experiments... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: HIGH-DIMENSIONAL NORMALIZED DATA PROFILES FOR TESTING DERIVATIVE-FREE OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHMS
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: - Mathematical notation in page 2 is not standard in the DFO literature. Please use widely-used mathematical notation.
- Capitalize the first letter in "equation"
- "The HNM algorithm proved to deliver better performance than the
traditional NM algorithm, represented by a famous Matlab function, k... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: HIGH-DIMENSIONAL NORMALIZED DATA PROFILES FOR TESTING DERIVATIVE-FREE OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHMS
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: The prose of the article requires significant revision in order for it to meet the requirement for use of clear and unambiguous English. There are frequent grammatical errors and use of terms which are, to my experience, non-standard with respect to the common language of the mathematical sciences. A n... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: HIGH-DIMENSIONAL NORMALIZED DATA PROFILES FOR TESTING DERIVATIVE-FREE OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHMS
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: The authors have addressed all my comments.
Experimental design: The authors addressed most of my comments. However, they did not address the most important two issues:
- The test functions have not been presented in the text. More importantly, all these problems have only a few variables. The author... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: HIGH-DIMENSIONAL NORMALIZED DATA PROFILES FOR TESTING DERIVATIVE-FREE OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHMS
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: The overall prose of the article has improved but significant proofreading and revision of some paragraphs are required in order to meet the criteria of clear and unambiguous professional English. Identified typos and suggested re-phrasing are included in 'Additional comments', however, I am certain th... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: HIGH-DIMENSIONAL NORMALIZED DATA PROFILES FOR TESTING DERIVATIVE-FREE OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHMS
Review round: 3
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: The authors have addressed all of my comments.
Experimental design: The authors have addressed all of my comments.
Validity of the findings: The authors have addressed all of my comments.
Additional comments: The authors have addressed all of my comments. |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: MITIGATION OF BLOCK WITHHOLDING ATTACK BASED ON ZERO-DETERMINANT STRATEGY
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: I recommend to (also) display the revenue of the independent miners in an additional Figure 4(c).
Could mention, at least as outlook / room for further consideration:
Would mining difficulty adjustment (after 14 days) adjust pool revenue facing a block withholding attack?
Section "ZD strategy" (f... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: MITIGATION OF BLOCK WITHHOLDING ATTACK BASED ON ZERO-DETERMINANT STRATEGY
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: This paper deduces the calculation formula of the actual income of the mining pool when the block withholding attack is launched. The ensemble strategy, extortion strategy and the proposed adaptive strategy of ZD are studied. Then, the mitigation of block interception attack based on ensemble strategy,... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: MITIGATION OF BLOCK WITHHOLDING ATTACK BASED ON ZERO-DETERMINANT STRATEGY
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 3 | Basic reporting: In this manuscript, the authors investigated block withholding attack in blockchain based on game theory. They consider the situation that only two mining pools exist and one or both pools attack each other. By calculating revenue of each mining pool, they pointed out that choosing whether it attacks t... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: MITIGATION OF BLOCK WITHHOLDING ATTACK BASED ON ZERO-DETERMINANT STRATEGY
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: Revised paper is much improved and can be accepted now.
Experimental design: Revised paper is much improved and can be accepted now.
Validity of the findings: Revised paper is much improved and can be accepted now.
Additional comments: No additional comments |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: MITIGATION OF BLOCK WITHHOLDING ATTACK BASED ON ZERO-DETERMINANT STRATEGY
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: The authors sincerely addressed my comments or explained the novelty of their work in their rebuttal. Now I understand that the innovation of their work is an application of zero-determinant strategies to block withholding attack, and recommend an acceptance.
Experimental design: no comment
Validity of... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: ALIGNING RESTRICTED ACCESS DATA WITH FAIR: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: 1. To date, it remains unclear how sensitive data should be managed, accessed, and analysed (Cox et al., 2016).
- 6-year-old statement is given to express today’s situation
2. Is there any solid ground behind the selection of Eligibility criteria?
3. Condition four of the eligibility criteria is no... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: ALIGNING RESTRICTED ACCESS DATA WITH FAIR: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: The paper analyzes various practices being followed in the research community to meet the data sharing proposed by FAIR principles. The manuscript provides a detailed survey of key mechanisms involved in applying FAIR principles on restricted research data.
Experimental design: The identified research... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A HIGH-PERFORMANCE, HARDWARE-BASED DEEP LEARNING SYSTEM FOR DISEASE DIAGNOSIS
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: The paper proposes a novel methodology to diagnose cancer. The abstract should be verified in order to remove the grammatical errors.
Which type of cancer and from which organ has to be explained in detail.
The abstract states that the proposed system can also detect diseases from the heart. This se... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A HIGH-PERFORMANCE, HARDWARE-BASED DEEP LEARNING SYSTEM FOR DISEASE DIAGNOSIS
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: More points have to be included based on the complete methodology and results
The sentence “Moreover, the system is reconfigurable and can be programmed to classify any sample into one of two classes” has to be justified as the classification is nowhere shown throughout the manuscript.
The sentence “... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A HIGH-PERFORMANCE, HARDWARE-BASED DEEP LEARNING SYSTEM FOR DISEASE DIAGNOSIS
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 3 | Basic reporting: The paper proposed a hardware implementation for the cancer diagnosis problem. However, the contribution is not clear in the hardware methodologies that are introduced
1- The proposed architecture is very weak and has no enough contribution
as in Figure 3: Proposed ANN Topology
2- The proposed sy... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A HIGH-PERFORMANCE, HARDWARE-BASED DEEP LEARNING SYSTEM FOR DISEASE DIAGNOSIS
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 4 | Basic reporting: Authors have proposed a hardware-based deep learning system for cancer diagnosis. The research problem selected by author(s) is timely and important to be addressed. The overall structure and organization of the paper are satisfactory, and the paper qualifies for an above-average up-to-date bibliograph... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A HIGH-PERFORMANCE, HARDWARE-BASED DEEP LEARNING SYSTEM FOR DISEASE DIAGNOSIS
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: All requirements have been revised satisfactorily.
Experimental design: All requirements have been revised satisfactorily.
Validity of the findings: All requirements have been revised satisfactorily.
Additional comments: No additional comments |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A HIGH-PERFORMANCE, HARDWARE-BASED DEEP LEARNING SYSTEM FOR DISEASE DIAGNOSIS
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: All comments have been addressed
Experimental design: All comments have been addressed
Validity of the findings: All comments have been addressed
Additional comments: All comments have been addressed |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A HIGH-PERFORMANCE, HARDWARE-BASED DEEP LEARNING SYSTEM FOR DISEASE DIAGNOSIS
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 3 | Basic reporting: Authors revised the paper, so all comments were met
Experimental design: Authors revised the paper, so all comments were met
Validity of the findings: Authors revised the paper, so all comments were met
Additional comments: No additional comments |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: ENERGY EFFICIENT SERVICE PLACEMENT IN FOG COMPUTING
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: 1. Authors are required to improve the English language and some sentence structures need to be updated.
2. Some cited references are very old of year 2012
3. Overall article structure is good.
4. Hypotheses and results are OK and shared with the RAW data.
5. In some sections authors have written t... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: ENERGY EFFICIENT SERVICE PLACEMENT IN FOG COMPUTING
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: The paper is generally well-written and reasonably structured.
Experimental design: The authors have explained their system model and the proposed algorithm algorithm very well. However, they need to further clarify some points such as:
- The complexity of the proposed algorithms are not analysed.
-... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: ENERGY EFFICIENT SERVICE PLACEMENT IN FOG COMPUTING
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: Authors have improved the language.
References have been updated that includes some more recently published work
Figures are OK.
Experimental design: The authors have carried out the various experiments as per identified problem statement.
They have updated the methodology section accordingly.
Valid... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: IMPROVED GENETIC ALGORITHM OPTIMIZED LSTM MODEL AND ITS APPLICATION IN SHORT-TERM TRAFFIC FLOW PREDICTION
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: In this paper, author presented an improved genetic algorithm (OGA) to optimize long-term and short-term memory neural network (LSTM). However, there are some limitations that must be addressed as follows.
1. Some sentences in abstract are very lengthy (for example see sentence 1). These sentences sho... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: IMPROVED GENETIC ALGORITHM OPTIMIZED LSTM MODEL AND ITS APPLICATION IN SHORT-TERM TRAFFIC FLOW PREDICTION
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: The work is technically sound and has potential merit for publication. However, major revisions are needed to make it worth publishable.
Experimental design: The experimental section, in particular, the setup and parameters being used, needs further explanation.
Validity of the findings: The experiment... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: IMPROVED GENETIC ALGORITHM OPTIMIZED LSTM MODEL AND ITS APPLICATION IN SHORT-TERM TRAFFIC FLOW PREDICTION
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: The authors have addressed my comments properly. Therefore, this paper can be accepted in its present form.
Experimental design: no comment
Validity of the findings: no comment
Additional comments: No additional comments |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: IMPROVED GENETIC ALGORITHM OPTIMIZED LSTM MODEL AND ITS APPLICATION IN SHORT-TERM TRAFFIC FLOW PREDICTION
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: The revised version is much better than the original submission. However, structure of the manuscript should be improved.
Experimental design: The authors have improved their experimental discussion in the revision stage.
Validity of the findings: The manuscript is well written, and the conclusions are... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: IMPROVED GENETIC ALGORITHM OPTIMIZED LSTM MODEL AND ITS APPLICATION IN SHORT-TERM TRAFFIC FLOW PREDICTION
Review round: 3
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: Well improved.
Experimental design: Well written.
Validity of the findings: The revised version has potential merit for publication.
Additional comments: N/A |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: THE ACCURACY OF RANDOM FOREST PERFORMANCE CAN BE IMPROVED BY CONDUCTING A FEATURE SELECTION WITH A BALANCING STRATEGY
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: no comment
Experimental design: no comment
Validity of the findings: no comment
Additional comments: 1. According to the Abstract and Introduction sections, the purpose of this paper is to improve the accuracy and processing speed of random forest, but the actual research only reflects the accuracy and... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: THE ACCURACY OF RANDOM FOREST PERFORMANCE CAN BE IMPROVED BY CONDUCTING A FEATURE SELECTION WITH A BALANCING STRATEGY
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: This paper proposes a method to improve accuracy performance in random forest. Some important comments:
1. The main contribution of this paper is not explained, for example the difference with previous studies.
2. Explanation of the flow of thought on how IG uses the standard deviation (SD) as a thre... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: THE ACCURACY OF RANDOM FOREST PERFORMANCE CAN BE IMPROVED BY CONDUCTING A FEATURE SELECTION WITH A BALANCING STRATEGY
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: 1) I think the 3 references mentioned in Concern #2 and # 3 of the last review comments should be added to the references to elaborate the research background in the Introduction section.
Experimental design: None
Validity of the findings: 2) Due to feature selection and SMOTE are common model optimiza... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: THE ACCURACY OF RANDOM FOREST PERFORMANCE CAN BE IMPROVED BY CONDUCTING A FEATURE SELECTION WITH A BALANCING STRATEGY
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: All previous concerns have been addressed.
Experimental design: The corrections have been done as per requirement.
Validity of the findings: All suggestions have been fulfilled
Additional comments: The authors must improve the grammar of English writing |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: THE ACCURACY OF RANDOM FOREST PERFORMANCE CAN BE IMPROVED BY CONDUCTING A FEATURE SELECTION WITH A BALANCING STRATEGY
Review round: 3
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: All previous concerns have been addressed.
Experimental design: None
Validity of the findings: All previous concerns have been addressed.
Additional comments: None |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: FG-DROID: GROUPING BASED FEATURE SIZE REDUCTION FOR ANDROID MALWARE DETECTION
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: The English language used in the paper is not up to publishable academic standards. The abstract is written in the past tense. Apart from numerous grammatical mistakes, there are many spelling mistakes in the paper. What makes it worst, the text written from lines 174 to 177 is in some other language (... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: FG-DROID: GROUPING BASED FEATURE SIZE REDUCTION FOR ANDROID MALWARE DETECTION
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: The English language should be improved to ensure that an international audience can clearly understand your text. Their are too many grammatical mistakes, the article need to go through proofreading
Introduction should be rewrite again
Missing sentences in Line 16
This has resulted in the undesired... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: FG-DROID: GROUPING BASED FEATURE SIZE REDUCTION FOR ANDROID MALWARE DETECTION
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: I strongly recommend the authors to re-write the last sentence in the abstract. The word "thanks to" should be replaced. Apart from that, the paper satisfies the publication standards.
Experimental design: Good
Validity of the findings: Justified
Additional comments: The author has put a lot of effort ... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF 3D DEEP LEARNING APPROACH INCORPORATING COORDINATE INFORMATION TO IMPROVE THE SEGMENTATION OF PRE- AND POST-OPERATIVE ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: a. Clear and unambiguous, professional English used throughout.
The paper is generally well-written and easy to follow, despite some sentences are confusing and need revisions:
Line 252-253 (“The experiments were implemented using the PyTorch (v1.8.0) deep learning library with Tensorflow backend in... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF 3D DEEP LEARNING APPROACH INCORPORATING COORDINATE INFORMATION TO IMPROVE THE SEGMENTATION OF PRE- AND POST-OPERATIVE ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: This paper presents a new 3D AAA segmentation approach that incorporates coordinate information to improve the segmentation results. The authors have tested the proposed method on various network architectures, including UNet, AG-DSV-UNet, VNet, ResNetMed, and DenseVoxNet, and transfer learning from a ... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: EFFECTIVE ATTRIBUTED NETWORK EMBEDDING WITH INFORMATION BEHAVIOR EXTRACTION
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: Throughout the manuscript, this paper uses clear and unambiguous professional English. Although adequate literature references and field background/context are provided, the literature discussion is missing a few related works. The proposed method is self-contained, with results correlating to hypothes... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: EFFECTIVE ATTRIBUTED NETWORK EMBEDDING WITH INFORMATION BEHAVIOR EXTRACTION
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: This manuscript captures the structural and attribute features of the network using existing network embedding algorithms, and proposes the TNE model to extract additional information behavior features. Finally, the link prediction performance of the network is improved.
1.The number of references in... |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 6
Models trained or fine-tuned on CleverShovel/paper_reviews