text stringlengths 0 1.99k |
|---|
binary as a parameter, here is the command I came up with: |
ROPgadget --binary libc.so.6 --all --nojop --badbytes 0A |
I marked 0A (newline) as a bad byte because the code is reading our input |
with gets(), which cuts off at newline - so anything after that would just |
be ignored. |
Next, we are looking for two gadgets that are exactly x pages apart from |
each other. For example, take a look at these: |
1. 0x0015b456 : pop ebx ; pop esi ; pop edi ; pop ebp ; ret |
2. 0x0015c456 : ret |
Then we will use one of those gadgets in our buffer overflow - for example, |
the second one. We will pair it with a libc base address guess, taken from |
one of the program's previous runs. |
For simplicity, let's go with a guessed libc base of 0xf0000000. |
Here is what our stack looks like during the overflow: |
+----------------------------------------+ |
| AAAAAAAAAA | AAAAAAAAAAAA | 0xf015c456 | |
+----------------------------------------+ |
^ |
the return address --------------+ |
We are overwriting the return address with our gadget at 0xf015c456, sitting |
exactly one page above the first ROP gadget inside our guessed libc. |
And here is how the relevant chunk of memory in libc looks: |
+----------------+ |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
libc base address --> |----------------| 0xf0000000 |
| . | |
| . | |
| . | |
|----------------| |
| First gadget | 0xf015b456 |
| . | |
|----------------| |
relevant gadget --> | Second gadget | 0xf015c456 |
| . | |
| . | |
| . | |
end of libc --> |----------------| |
| | |
| | |
+----------------+ |
Now, if the program actually maps libc at our guessed address (0xf0000000) |
then our second ROP gadget will get triggered right away. But what about |
the first ROP gadget? How does it help? |
Here is the trick: since libc is always loaded with page alignment, there is |
an equal chance the base address might land at 0xf0001000, just one page off |
from our original guess. In that case, the memory layout shifts, and looks |
like this: |
+----------------+ |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
libc base address --> |----------------| 0xf0001000 |
| . | |
| . | |
| . | |
|----------------| |
relevant gadget --> | First gadget | 0xf015c456 |
| . | |
|----------------| |
| Second gadget | 0xf015d456 |
| . | |
| . | |
| . | |
end of libc --> |----------------| |
| | |
| | |
+----------------+ |
So now, if libc loads one page higher, our overwritten return address will |
still point into libc - but this time it hits the first gadget instead of |
the second. That way, we have doubled our chances of a successful hit, |
without changing the payload! |
In order to successfully execute arbitrary code in both cases, we need to |
know which ROP gadget was triggered - which tells us what the libc base |
address is. Once we figure that out, we can continue crafting the rest of |
our chain accordingly. |
You might have noticed that in both of our gadgets, we change the stack |
pointer. However, each ROP gadget adjusts it by a different amount. In our |
example, the first gadget pops four more values than the second. This subtle |
difference is key: it lets us identify which ROP gadget actually ran based |
on where the stack pointer ends up at. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.