text stringlengths 0 1.99k |
|---|
seem to think it was surprising that they flew me to NY every week. I don't, |
and I'm sure the other 100 businessmen on my flights who I traveled with |
regularly would be surprised that they carried the unique distinction of being |
somehow in the wrong for having their companies send them to NY every week. |
I'll have to tell them this one for a good laff next time I get a 50,000 |
dollar a yr job that sends me to NY. Moving right along, I will add that I was |
employed as a Systems Analyst. When I was originally hired, my interview was |
by a fellow from Miami (Telecom Mgnt) and the interview was conducted in the |
Chas office (one of the few times I was ever in there). This however doesn't |
explain why Pauline Frazier and Ben Graves knew me or didn't care for me. The |
reason for this was quite simple: they both knew about me and the bulletin |
board and had also been trying to catch me stealing calls from there company |
(don't know where they ever got that idea <grin>). At any rate they obviously |
were quite unhappy because I got that job. |
The next comment in rebut to Telecomputist which was a rebut to PWN Phrack |
Issue 8 (what a nightmare), was, and I quote, "I claimed not to have any ties |
with Vegas but didn't claim not to have ties with TMC." Boy talk about factual |
journalism, really grabbing for straws aren't you. Anything to make me look |
bad huh? Wonder why. Wouldn't be for more copies for your next issue would it? |
As you could see at the beginning of this rebuttal I clearly stated that |
Telecom Management ran 6 TMC markets as well as other companies and that they |
were connected but separate from each other. Although none of it is relevant |
to any of this, but that doesn't matter when you are out to get copies for |
your next issue does it KL. At any rate this also shows where Telecomputist, |
although trying to do a good thing, got their facts mixed up too by |
misunderstanding the fact that Telecom Managements initials were the same as |
TMC and were unrelated companies when actually they are. |
In you next comments you say, "The rest of my statements are highly debatable" |
(might try looking at a few (no make that all) of your own). You also said |
that my statements have no proof (as if yours are so damn factual). First, I |
don't have to prove a thing to assholes like you or anyone else for that |
matter. You also state your decision (as if you have the right to make any |
decisions about me, (shit boy you don't even know me, but you may soon) was to |
do nothing because of lack of proof. And you call what you came up with truth? |
Based on what, your vast personal knowledge of me, your knowledge of something |
some phone phreak told you, because of having worked with me? As for providing |
more ammunition to the idea, I'm not what I claim to be. I have claimed to be |
nothing, it's you doing all the claiming. And there is no "ammunition" to be |
had from the Telecomputist article as it was about as accurate as yours have |
been. Shows you what two people who know nothing about nothing can do if they |
put their minds to it. I might add that this is the first and last statement I |
have personally written that has anything to do with any of this. You also |
stated that, "after three months you had proof," yet you have shown only |
words, not a speck of proof or truth. You have taken the Telecomputist article |
apart and tried every way there was to tear it apart, most of which was |
guesswork and innuendo. Examples of this are your quotes of, "Gee isn't that |
awful expensive," "Notice how he didn't say he had no ties with TMC," |
"Statements were highly debatable," "Now that he has had a few months to come |
up with a story," etc., that's some real facts there KL, you're a real |
journalist who deals only with facts. You're not out for gossip or character |
assassination. Riiiiiight. I've just been waiting for you to put your foot in |
your mouth (in this case both feet). (Don't worry, I'm sure they will fit |
nicely) |
I think it's also time to tell the story of how all this got started. It's |
really a comedy of errors (only I'm not laffing). As I stated earlier I was |
paid by Miami, as that's where the home office was. This meant that on |
occasion I also went to Miami as well as NY. In Dec of 85 I learned of a new |
organization being formed called the CFCA (Communications Fraud Control |
Association) although in addition to communications, they support computer and |
credit security as well. Knowing that all the top security people were going |
to be there and being a good phone phreak on the eternal quest for inside |
knowledge, I wanted in on this conference which was held the 6th, 7th and 8th |
of Feb 86 in Miami. Soooooo I convinced Telecom that we should check these |
People out for some benefit to our company with regard to my job (Systems |
Analyst) as after all it was my job to not only develop and operate the |
companies' computers but keep them secure as well. So I had had the perfect |
excuse to get me in the conference. They agreed with me and went for it and |
paid for my flight down there and the conference fee. Moving right along, it |
was the 1st day into the conference when just at lunch I was talking to a guy |
from Pac NW Bell named Larry Algard (whose name I had forgotten til Sally Ride |
showed up on the BBS saying Larry the Algardian had sent me a couple of weeks |
later). At any rate while talking to this guy, a security agent from one of |
the other LD companies that was there came up and said, "Aren't you Scan Man, |
the guy that runs P-80?" Needless to say I about shit, and had to come up with |
a damn good answer in about a 100th of a second. Knowing I was there legally |
with the authority of my company, I answered back (in front of Larry Algard), |
"Yes, but unbeknownst to my members it's an undercover board for TMC the |
company I work for." And since Telecom Management Corporations initials were |
TMC and they did manage 6 TMC LD companies I knew I was safe if he decided to |
check me out, which I was worried about because earlier this same guy (the one |
that said, "Aren't you Scan Man") had made a comment about the security of the |
meeting and that he believed hackers had infiltrated the meeting. At any rate, |
I was out of the fire with this guy and everyone (about 7 others) standing |
around in our circle. It does however get worse. Two weeks later I got a new |
user on the board named Sally Ride saying, "Larry The Algardian sent me" and |
the msg subj was titled Scott Higginbotham. I answered the msg asking him |
where he got that name (Scott Higginbotham, my real name) but he thought I |
meant where did he get the name Larry the Algardian (see msg reprint below). |
His reply is as follows (actual copy of msg) |
Scan Man, I got the name from an electronic memo from Sec. Mgr. Larry Algard |
to his boss, George Reay. Since I've access to these files via PNB's UNIX AOS, |
I read about Algard's meeting with Scott at a CFCA Conf. in Miami. It's nice |
to be able to know what the other side is up to, but how did you infiltrate |
CFCA? I was able to infiltrate PNB Sec. thru their own system. But, to attend |
such a meeting of the toll carriers of the nation and learn their plans to |
combat us is a real coup! Understand where I'm coming from? |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.