text stringlengths 5 149 |
|---|
operations can arise from features on the landscape when |
VLOS mission encounter obstacles such as mountains, |
dense forests and cities. Fig. 2 demonstrates typical areas of |
application for VLOS and BVLOS operations. |
It is apparent that BVLOS capability is becoming an |
essential requirement as companies strive to develop |
autonomous passenger and air freight systems. To achieve |
safe deployment a UAS will depend on 360 -degree radial |
technologies that allow the vehicle to be aware of its |
surroundings. The following text reviews the BVLOS |
situational awareness methodologies and technologies that |
are currently available or in development. |
II. FIRST PERSON VIEW (FPV) AND DETECT AND AVOID |
TECHNOLOGIES |
In 2017 Transport Canada issued their unprecedented |
permission to Ventus Geospatial to perform a BVLOS test. |
The test was conducted using a Skyranger UAV whichreached a distance of 1.4 miles from the operator and was |
fitted with a camera for a First -Person View (FPV) |
allowing the live feed to be fed back to a monitored display |
[13]. For the test run a chase vehicle was also used as a |
back up to monitor its progress. |
FPV is not an uncommon means of technology to use |
with applications of this nature, although it could be argued |
that it cannot and should not replace a pilot’s own visual |
range as there is more to BVLOS applications than merely |
having a visual layout of the surrounding area. Other |
technologies should also be implemented for a flight plan to |
be executed safely. According to the reports surrounding |
the Skyranger test flight, the UAV was not fitted with any |
detect and avoid technology but in further tests will use |
Automatic Dependent Surveillance – Broadcast (ADS -B), |
which is surveillance technology that allows an aircraft to |
determine its position via satellite navigation and then inturn broadcast it periodically enabling it to be monitored |
and tracked. [14]. This, however, is not without its |
problems, such as the security of the UAS. A paper |
published by Costin and Francillon [15] questioned this |
lack of security in relation to protocol and practical attacks. |
The research concluded that there is indeed an inherent |
insecurity to the commercial grade ADS -B design as it was |
missing the most basic of security protocols. Taking this |
into consideration however, one of the most recent ADS -B |
products has been used for BVLOS operations is the |
Ping20s which has been successfully used on a UAV. It |
was used in a successful night and day test which was |
performed by Australian company V -Tol Aerospace and UK based RelmaTech [16]. Presently the Ping20s is |
possibly the world’s smallest and affordable Mode S ADS - |
B transponder and allows UAV’s to respond to Mode S |
radar [17] (Fig. 3). This UAV was also fitted with aGosHawk -II HD sensor and its integrated laser rangefinders |
can determine exact distance under all environmental |
conditions. It is also equipped with optical sensors for both |
night and daytime operations [18]. The need to be able to |
fly at night is an essential commodity in the drone industry |
and the development of this technology could pave the way |
for regulated night missions to become a reality. |
There is also an obvious need for a UAV to be aware of |
its surroundings and aware of other air traffic by using |
detect and avoid technology. One such technology has been |
developed and a paper published by Balachandran et al. |
[19]. The paper explores an approach that enables a |
multitude of aircraft to coordinate their own manoeuvres. |
This is achieved by each of the aircraft implicitly agreeing |
on the region of the airspace that they will be occupying at |
that time. This in turn has led to the construction of a |
feedback mechanism that can be executed in real time. Theplanning of this process assumes that all the aircraft will |
reside in their own region and it is this assumption that is |
crucial to ensure that no aircraft are able to occupy the |
same airspace. Information is shared between the aircraft in |
relation to when one aircraft speeds up or slows down and |
will then asses the likelihood of a collision. If an aircraft |
enters an adjacent zone occupied by another aircraft it will |
be required to enter a holding pattern until it decides that it |
is safe to proceed it is therefore much more suited to |
multirotor UAV’s than fixed wing craft. This decision - |
making ability can also serve as a feedback mechanism. |
The conclusion raised in the paper states that the best Fig. 2. VLOS and BVLOS mission applications. |
Fig. 3. Ping20s transponder [17]. |
Hobbyists |
Sport |
Real Estate |
Cinematography Structural |
Inspections |
Surveying |
Mapping |
Environmental |
Research |
First |
RespondersSearch and Rescue |
Package Delivery |
Linear Inspection(Rail, Oil and Power)Border Patrol |
Fish and GameVLOS BVLOSmethod would be to enforce separation between aircraft by |
using geo -fencing restraints. |
III. UAS T RAFFIC MANAGEMENT (UTM) S YSTEM |
NASA has been a major contributor to the world of |
UAS and has explored and developed prototype |
technologies for a UAS Traffic Management (UTM) |
system [21]. It is thought that this will enable the |
integration requirements needed for safe and efficient low |
altitude applications to be performed [19]. The paper |
presented by Kopardekar et al. [21] proposed a concept of |
operations for the UTM model. However, flying drones and |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.