text stringlengths 53 13.5k | label class label 2 classes |
|---|---|
formula flick of guy who want girl and guy who will lie to get next to girl and guy who will get best friend to help in outrageous way ( comedus reliefus and no . ) to help deceive girl and etc . this one be do to death and and with rare exception of a few z rat outing and it be do well . stale plot aside and the lead be attractive and there a couple of good moment . jonathon schaech have do well and and his acting here come close to be phone in . not a complete loss and but nothing new here in this tepid affair . | 0neg |
i have try to watch this so called comedy and but it very hard to bear . this be a bad and narrow mind and cliché ridden movie . definitively not funny and but very much boring and annoying and indeed . bad script and bad acting . it a complete waste of time and there remain nothing more to say and i be afraid . negative point . | 0neg |
one of the bad romantic comedy ( nay and bad movie ) i have ever see . boy ( who work a a phone psychic . ) must pretend to be gay to move into apartment with woman of his dream . hilarity do not ensue . boredom and light gay bashing and and horrible dialogue do . if you read brad meltzer and like his crappy dialogue and you will like this movie . be smart . avoid this . if you see it and destroy the copy . | 0neg |
yet another insult and slap in the face to gay men everywhere . this lame attempt at a comedy have nothing to recommend it . once again we have an attractive traight hero who supposedly can not get any woman to be interested in him . yeah and right . and be also present with the ympathetic and attractive gay friend who be actually a fat and balding and ugly old man whom the lead be suppose to find attractive . even i do not find him appeal and i be a fat and ugly old gay man ( but thankfully not bald ) . whatever act talent there may be here have be throw away on a bad script and and truly awful direction . mr. sneedeker should be ban from filmdom and but then he no different than the countless other hack work in hollyweed . | 0neg |
this horrendously bad piece of trash manages to be racist and sexist and homophobic all at once and while pretend to be terribly chic and sophisticated . atrocious performance and a cliche ridden screenplay and and boring direction make this movie one to steer clear of . two scene be especially offensive the one in which schaech scrub his tongue after be kiss by another man ( could it really have be that gross ) and and the scene where eastwood be kiss by schaech best friend and who be pretend to be russian . after he leave the room she exclaim fking foreigner . so much for her be a culture artist who dream of living in paris . jonathon schaech can be a likeable actor on screen and and be astonishingly good look . it a shame he do not learn more from work with cut edge gay director gregg araki on an early film and and try to salvage this film from descend into a string of gay stereotype and a mire of homophobia . | 0neg |
they play this on the july 4th twilight zone marathon and this be and hand down and the bad twilight zone episode i have ever see . it completely out of sync with the rest of the series in it tone . even though twilight zone be a pretty uneven series and many episode end up be groaningly predictable and this one be completely out of place . compare this to legendary episode like a stop at willoughby or midnight sun and and you realize there be no comparison . buster keaton do what he could with such terrible material and and frankly it surprise me that someone of his historic comedy stature would stoop to the level of this episode . even though he seem to be give it some effort and he must have need the money . there no other explanation . | 0neg |
i be one of the big fan of silent comedian and have probably review more buster keaton film for imdb than any other person . every film he make from the beginning of his career to the early 30 with only two exception have i review and so you can tell i be a major fan . it because of this that i find this episode so painful and hard to watch . i love this man film and keep think buster and how could you . well and now that i think about it and i guess i can see why buster keaton star in this god awful episode of the twilight zone . he would lose much of his fortune after a messy divorce in the early 1930s and his film career a a lead man be long pass as well . now and in the 1960s and keaton need the money and love his resurgence in popularity so he whore himself out to anyone willing to pay appear in beach film and this mess of an episode of a great series . the big problem with the episode be that it be just terribly write and buster deserve much well . the show be suppose to be funny but isn not and instead of a homage to silent film be just painful to watch particularly with keaton put that stupid time travel helmet on as well a all the poorly execute slapstick . do yourself a favor and skip this one it a pale imitation of the greatness that once be keaton career . | 0neg |
equal equal equal minor spoiler equal equal equal i be and like many others and a huge jerry bruckheimer fan . so when i saw all the beautiful poster hang out front and and the trailer come by before mi represent2 and expectation be rise . a jerry bruckheimer production . big car . nic cage and fresh from an oscar angelina jolie . what can possibly go wrong . a lot . the script be neither funny ( which it try really hard to be ) nor excite . you put in a black person who be constantly make racist joke about himself and wooh haa . you have get comedy . i do not think so . excitement be totally out of the picture . first of all ( and this be probably say many time ) there be no sympathetic character so who care who get kill . if you can stomach the premise that a psycho be gon na kill nic brother unless he steal 50 car in 4 day and next thing you know be that kip ( the brother ) be walk with nic in the street again . be this excitement . think not . then come the best bit the romance between nic and angelina . she actually look bored have to utter all these stupid line to nic . do you have a girlfriend . be you see anybody . what go wrong . etc . then there only one sparkle of hope leave represent the car chase . theyre disappoint to say the least and because the trailer make it look like it be full of them and and there only one . a very long one and catch in irritatingly hectic camera movement . i really have trouble follow the action . so be it an action movie . a thriller . a romantic comedy . there no need to decide and just avoid this horrible mess . i will give negative star and and i feel like i be be generous . | 0neg |
this movie should be show to film school student a an example of what not to do . the original kick some major tire squeal butt and this horrible disaster break the cardinal rule of bruckheimer film and which be represent we all know they suck and but they have great action . this film have no action . this film be bore . where be the car . where be the chase . where the tension . where the suspense . where the rush . where . this isn not really a movie at all and it a bad commercial . 50 car in 24 hour . that be wrong . they have 3 day to steal them and the ad be wrong . how bad be that . the lead act be stiff and wooden and force . the villain and the cop and the others . who care . they utter their pointless line and they serve the illogical plot . they slog through it the best they can a the music video director say do not worry we will make a lot of fast cut and no one will notice how bad the film be or we will fix it with lot of loud music the script isn not really a script at all and it more like a list of cliche with an end that be a total ripoff of represent warn possible spoiler 5 4 3 2 1 the fugitive . the big crime of all be the underuse of vinnie jones and man . this be the baddest and cool mofo since jules in pulp fiction . and what do they do . they make him a mute who hardly in the film . make vinnie the main villain and he could have save the film . how could they have be so dumb . how . how . why . the original film be very entertaining with a cool trick at the end that get the driver away . the original have a great 40 minute chase that delivers . go find the original . or if youre crave some real car chase action go rent ronin . the chase in ronin raise the bar by which all other car chase will now be judge . bruckheimer and cage have all that money and all those resource and all that experience and and they can not even come close to match a film make 25 year ago for $ 250 and 000. how can that be . you feel like you get rip off after see this movie . where i be once excite to see coyote ugly and remember the titan and pearl harbor and now i say represent god help u all . . | 0neg |
warn represent review contains slight spoilersthere a parallel universe out there where go in 60 second be a dark and edgy and controversial independent movie . unfortunately in this dimension go . be a flashy and vacuous and testosterone fuel moronfest star nicolas cage . for reason not really worth get into and he and his large number of crony have four day to steal fifty expensive car and only one of which have an alarm . this crew consist of the guy with the funny shape ear who rumour to be the new superman while a guy who conduct electricity in the x file while an ex professional footballer and two token black men . their enemy be cop and rival car thief and bilborough from cracker and his manchester accent suitably flatten and broaden for american audience who be now use to that sort of thing since daphne in frasier . there also angelina jolie and who get no character while save to be a receptacle to men sexual desire . she and cage be suppose to be old flame and which be odd and a they never have anything approach a normal conversation in all of the film overlong 135m running time . in fact and characterisation be so poor that whenever anyone have a moment a violin play in the background to accentuate the emotion . it no spoiler to reveal that vinnie jones ( who recreate his famous paul gasgoine hand ball manoeuvre and be quite menace when silent ) only get one line while not because his inability to speak be integral to the plot but because his eloquent sum up of the film dubious morality after appear mute the whole way through be funny . allegedly . after he struggle through it in his not quite act but it will do london drawl and cage quip i always think you be from long island . my rib and a you might imagine and be well and truly tickled . in fact humour be the most undeveloped aspect and from the tactless comedy policeman to the two token black character . this see the big aspect of hollywood take hold while why be it that a black man can not appear in a major motion picture without be constantly aware of his skin tone and endlessly refer to it . the young man and who and like the elder and jive talk for the whole duration and proclaim represent u black people do not like the cold . be tropical people . he then go on to express an urge to smoke a joint and watch root . he be and of course and parody the image of black people and but how funny be that . his old counterpart can not speak without refer to himself and and thereby his colour and in third person . my black as this and my black as that . do anyone know any black people who actually speak like that . think not . the film soundtrack be play almost non stop and with increase volume and some of the track especially apollo 440 don not stop the rock so loud theyre actually more audible than the sound effect and dialogue . the surroundsound system even separate the two to such a degree that it make them sound like two different film run together . no background music concept here and it the aural equivalent of try to watch a film while someone at the back of the cinema have their stereo turn up full blast . keep that music down and young man . this isn not the bad film in the world and in many way i enjoy it . it just that it predictable and lazy and witless and with minimal effort in it construction . apparently box office expectation be considerably down for this movie . after be force feed junk for several year it appear the general public be start to wake up to the fact . | 0neg |
this review may contain some spoiler . the remake of the classic 1974 car chase movie go in 60 second begin well . actually it be well act and the plot move quite well . but even a big hollywood budget doesn not change the fact that the original plot be more believable . for those who do not know and the original plot have the thief work a insurance inspector . who would suspect them . but even with a change to nearly every aspect of h. b. halicki original and the remake be a very good movie and until we get to the final chase scene and the part of the 74 version that make it great . the one in this version be water down and only 10 minute and and it culminate in a monster special effect that take all believability out of the chase . where the original chase be very believable and the star be a stunt driver who do all his own stunt and the remake fall flat in the last 15 minute . my advice and if you want to watch a classic car chase film and fine the original in the bargain bin at your local rental joint and stay clear of the new remake . | 0neg |
randall memphis raines be a retired master car thief who be force back into the game when his younger brother face death for not fill an order for british crime bos raymond calitri . the job involve lift 50 car in 24 hour or calitri will enact his punishment . so raines quickly assemble a crew he can trust and set about the task to hand . but the police be on to him and some of the car on the list be not easy take . it would seem a near impossible job to complete . it get quite a cast have go in 60 second and nicolas cage and angelina jolie and robert duvall and will patton and delroy lindo and vinnie jones and giovanni ribisi and christopher ecclestone and scott caan and timothy olyphant . all of whom deserve good . enough act horsepower there to propel a porsche 998 turbo . trouble be and be that this be very much a case of too many car overstock the car park and mucho character and not enough zest . from the off we be in no doubt that this be a bruckheimer or simpson production and bonkers script lace with loud noise and lashing of cheese and scattergun editing and and direct with sledgehammer subtly by dominic sena . it essentially a big budget remake of h. b. halicki 1974 indie movie of the same name and with the premise offering up the potential for an adrenalin fuel car base movie . potential that sadly be never realise . there one or two high impact moment and daft for sure and but enjoyable none the less . but if you pardon the pun and the film never get out of first gear and it more content to labour with it ream of character who mope about try to make the boorish screenplay { scott rosenberg } work . car fan will get something from it { the car be ace on the eye } and as will fan of unintentional comedy movie { check out ecclestone carpenter grief moment } . but no and it really rather poor all tell . 4/10 . | 0neg |
i watch this because i think there be go to be a lot of car chase and cool car to gawk at . guess i be lie to . this movie be very boring . the movie start out kip raines ( giovanni ribisi ) sit outside a porsche dealership check to see if they have the right car . when they confirm it the right one and kip get a brick out of the trunk and chuck it at the window and shatter it . he get the porsche while his friend get the key . they start up the car and take off into the night . they deliver it to a warehouse only to have be follow by the police . so and the whole crew ditch all the car and go their separate way . then and we get a glimpse of memphis raines . he be give a little speech to a bunch of kid at a go kart track . then and he be confront by atlee jackson ( will patton ) . atlee tell memphis that his brother kip be in deep bleep . memphis be know a one of the most notorious car thief in los angeles . memphis head to a junkyard and meet raymond calitri ( christopher ecclesten ) . this guy threaten to kill kip if memphis doesn not deliver 50 car within 72 hour . there be a few problem with this film represent 1. story represent the first 48 in movie hour take place when cage and duvall be look for a crew and plan everything out . the last 12 in movie hour be a waste . 2. the car represent you see maybe 10 car out of the 50 a the movie advertise . so and where be the other 40 car . why do not we get to see them . 3. the chase represent the chase at the end of the movie be a joke . it be not suspenseful at all . 4. the dog represent somewhere in the movie and the dog eat the burger and swallow three key as well . this be impossible . the key be flip open . the key would have severely damage the dog esophagus and stomach and and large intestine . the guys suggest give the dog laxatives to help him poop it out . this would not work . the dog will get a lot of diarrhea but no key . it be state in jackass after ryan dunne stick a toy car up his rectum . take laxative and lot of diarrhea and but no car . same case with the dog . 5. the cop during the chase represent when eleanor break down for a few minute and nicholas cage try desperately to start up the car . you see a police cruiser behind him who isn not look at his car at all . but and right when nicholas cage start the engine up again and the police officer jerk his head to the right and see the car and and immediately begin to chase after him . it be stupid . so and right when he hear the engine start and and saw the car and he know that be the car he be look for . how do he know it the right car . he only see the back of it . overall and the movie be bore . there be no action . there be very few car . the movie be stupid . i have never see the original but i plan to . i give this movie 1 star out of 10. get the fast and furious instead . | 0neg |
the remake of h. b. halicki classic seventy chase film be simply horrible . along with vanish point and go in 60 second represent the quintessential car chase film . the remake take the original and stand it on it head . whereas halicki give u 75 % car chase and 25 % support drama and in giss 2000 we get 25 % car chase and 75 % support drama . cage a super man and save his brother and kiss the girl . mtv edits and tit and as . save your money and rent the original . at least halicki do not live to see his baby ( he write and produce and direct and and star in the 74 film ) degrade in this manner . | 0neg |
this be a horrible film . i give it 2 point and one for angelina jolie and a second one for the beautiful porsche in the beginning . other than that the story just plain suck and car race through city wasn not so new in 1970. the happyend be probably what annoy me the most and seldomly see anything so construct . | 0neg |
this movie show u nothing original . every idea or ( action ) scene can be find in many previously release movie . fabulous nick be completely plain here . even will patton be calm and evil nor good . mr. duvall be ok and but have a very small part . so do angelina and so how can we determine her newly acclaim stardom . overall and there be too many character and so that nobody and nothing be especially detailed . this make the movie easy to forget . too bad and do not you think . | 0neg |
1975 master of the fly guillotine be an amazing and wonderful film to watch . this isn not because the fighting be particularly inspire or because the film make any sense at all . it because the film be so silly and so over the top that it be a camp classic bad and but enjoyably bad . the film star a blind guy who have a frisbee like device on a chain that chop off people head a he expertly throw this at his foe . who care that the physic be impossible or that the film feature such silly thing a fighter with 12 foot long papier mache arm or that the guy be blind . it just a ball to watch from start to finish and one of my favorite bad film and great to see with friend . because of this film and i be eager to see the fatal fly guillotine ( 1977 ) and though sadly it turn out not to be a sequel but a bit of a knock off take many of the idea from the original but neglect to make the film a coherent or watchable . sure and it silly fun and but it never come close to master of the fly guillotine in entertainment value . like the original film and there be these weird fly device that sever head and but they be quite different with circular saw blade and almost a mind of their own . there also be no blind guy but instead be a bunch of baddie who really have no depth nor do the audience understand exactly what occur in this english dub version and a the plot be completely incomprehensible . however and at the same time and some of the martial art action be very good . while not up to the high standard of most bruce lee or sonny chiba film and the action be worthwhile despite the ludicrous and often confusing plot . overall and this be a film that martial art fan may like ( despite it many and many and many and many shortcoming ) and but also one that others will probably turn off or laugh hysterically at instead of enjoy the action because the film be just so ludicrous . but and most importantly and it never come close to be a funny or watchable a master of the fly guillotine . too bad . | 0neg |
although there fly guillotine a part of the title of this movie and it have no connection to the original flying guillotine ( 1975 ) and it sequel fly guillotine ii ( 1978 ) . the two original be masterpiece of kung fu movie and still stand out a a classic . this be a much inferior copy of the original and and even a a regular kung fu movie and it below average . first of all and this movie doesn not have much acting . it one senseless fight scene after another and and fly guillotine doesn not even play a major part in them . story be about some shaolin monk who be track down some villain who have take off with a sacred book and and an evil prince who own part of this book be part of the plot . the same evil prince have plan to lure the monk in and use the fly guillotine on them . there be four movie with fly guillotine a part of it title . this in my opinion be of least quality . the design of the fly guillotine in this movie be different from the other three indicate that this movie be produce by a different entity from the other three . the movie have no chemistry asides from be unintentionally funny due to poor production . best skip this and watch the two original . | 0neg |
this movie get extremely silly when thing start to happen . i couldn not care less about any of the character while susan walter be so annoying and and the lead actor ( forget his name ) also get on my nerve . can not quite remember how it end and so forth but the whole idea of alien possess human body and all just seem stupid in this film and thing do not quite carry off . my dad tell me it s stupid movie . i should have listen to him . | 0neg |
i read the comment of chris_m_grant from united state . he write represent a fantastic documentary of 1924. this early 20th century geography of today iraq be powerful . i would like to thank chris and people who be interested in bakhtiari nomad of iran and the zagros mountain and landscape and have watch the movie grass and a nation battle for life . these tradition you saw in the movie have endure for century and will go on as long a life endures . i be from this region of iran myself . i be a bakhtiari . chris and i be sorry to bother you but bakhtiari region of zardkuh be in iran not in irak a you mention in your comment . iran and irak be two different and distinct country . take an iranian for an irankian be almost like take an american for an mexican . thanks and ziba . | 0neg |
documentary about nomadic persian make a treacherous traverse of massive mountain to get their herd to grass . watch this silent and black and white feature and mar in part by a twink twink twink oriental music score that could not have be use in the original exhibition and be even dull than it sound . the spectacular scenery be lose on a small black and white screen and and there be an utter failure to establish any kind of plot line . i love nanook of the north and march of the penguin and but despise this movie and notwithstanding the similarity of the theme . physical hardship alone be just not that interest . | 0neg |
the problem i find with this title be that i be not sure if the director be try to produce a documentary or movie . a blend of the two genre just doesn not work and that leave the whole thing hung in the middle of nowhere . this be more so a the director have pick the most extreme of what be suppose to be happen around our everyday life make it an unconvincing documentary . if it be mean to be a thriller or drama this be too dull and monotonous . in either case and what be the moral or the message which the director be try to convey to the audience . that around u there be people who ill treat others who be willing to be ill treat . that there be many crazy lunatic around u . so . so what . | 0neg |
this film be in no way entertainment but more of a look deep into the depth of the dark side of human behaviour . loosely link a half a dozen story of the bad kind of depravity and pervert sex and greed and violence and intolerance . all the action be play out over a few very hot and sticky day during a heatwave in vienna and the heat be maybe responsible for some of the anger and hate in the film . for me the treatment of the retarded girl by the security equipment salesman be about the bad episode and closely follow by the scene of drunkenness and perversity in the lags flat . you will be grip and i hope horrify by this film . i hat it but i felt compel to see it through . negative for fun positive for display aman a he sometimes be . | 0neg |
this movie remind me of irréversible ( 2002 ) and another art work movie with be a violent and radical approach of human nature . i do not like the movie but i can not say that it be a bad movie and it be just special . i reminds me also of camp cosmos ( 1996 ) where a bunch of low class figure be resident of a camp at the sea in belgium . the same description of people live together and side by side against their will and with all the confrontation of character that do not match together . i also think about the book by the french writer emile zola who be a writer of the style that be naturalism . i do not like the movie and i also do not like the people who be in it . they all seem so vulgar and without any basic good taste . one could ask the question why do they live and they all seem to be on this planet a a member of a big farce and force to live against their will . or you could say represent the hell be on this world . | 0neg |
earlier today i get into an argument on why so many people complain about modern film in which i encounter a curious statement represent the character development in new movie just isn not nearly as good or interesting a it use to be . depend on the film ( s ) in question and this can be attribute to a number of thing and sometimes generic special effect and plot driven hollywood garbage like war of the world and but in the case of over the top and uninteresting attempt at social commentary and a desperate struggle to put art back into cinema and it movie like dog day that be to blame . i normally have a very high tolerance for movie and no matter how dull or pointless i find them ( range from good and long one like andrei rublev and dogville and to one i have consider painful to sit through a la alpha dog and wild wild west ) . i shut this movie off 45 minute in and which be 30 minute more than i actually should have . i wasn not interested in any of the character whatsoever and find nothing substantial beyond a thin veil of unfocused pessimism . in an attempt to say something about the dreg of society and this film too easily fall into be self indulgent and trite and and exploitative in a very sincere sense . grant and i have see many disturb movie on the same subject and but there be so many good film out there about depress and pathetic people ( happiness and gummo and kid and salo and storytelling and irreversible ) that actually contain character of great emotional depth and personality . dog day have none more than an eighth grader distaste for society and choose to ignore any true intelligence about the way people actually be and and instead choose to be a dull and awful and and hopelessly unoriginal attempt at a work of art . this isn not a characterization of the unknown or a clever observation into the dreg of society and it just bore and nothing worth care about . | 0neg |
i once promise never to walk out of any film ( a personal policy that make me suffer through the most different kind of dreck and such a rambo 3 and baise moi and deep impact ) but mr. seidl almost succeed . hundstage be a truly awful experience . anyone who see this movie will think that austrian be a miserable and pathetic bunch of retard . it show a world where love and humanity do not exist and a world where people humiliate each other only for one reason to distract from their own miserable existence . by choose a documentary like style with non professional actor ( most of them look like straight from the imagination of austrian shock cartoonist deix ) director seidl want to make u believe that this be real life in austrian ( european . western . ) suburb . the viewer be confront with depiction of sex orgy and violence against woman and handicapped people and madness and degradation . but this isn not social criticism . this be just pure shock without any aesthetic value . instead you get bad acting and bad cinematography and bad filmmaking . if anybody need a film like this to realize that there be thing wrong in our society then this person must have walk through life with closed eye . this be pseudo social criticism with a sledge hammer . and it look down on people in a disgustingly condescending way . it show ugly people that be not the reason why i hate it . but it depict average people in an ugly and misanthropic way . and this be why this film be truly despicable . | 0neg |
if you be look for a film the portrays the pointless and boring existence of middle class life catch in a web of non communication and false ideal and then this be the film for you . if you also what the film to be engage and keep your interest and then you should probably look elsewhere . there be many film that do this far good . for example and try some of the darker film by bergman . the filmmaker felt that in order to show the spiritual poverty of the middle class he should subject the viewer to one agonizingly dull and vacuous incident after another until the film finally come to it tortuous and pathetic end . if you value your time there be far good way to spend two hour and like clean your house and for example . | 0neg |
fragmentaric movie about a couple of people in austria during a heatwave . this kind of movie have be do more often and and most of all and good . the story do not really have anything to do with each other and apart from the pathetic finale represent people be cruel . ugly flesh and unpleasant people and a movie that go on way too long without really make a point . ultra realistic . hardly . bore . indeed . not even gorgeous franzisca weiss can save this one . negative . | 0neg |
i do not think it could be do and but something have come along and replace open house a low budget horror about someone killing over the high price of real estate a the bad film i have ever see in my short but otherwise sweet life . it be tout a the best film in montreal most recent film festival and which lead me to believe that every other entry must consist of blank wall shot accompany by people read gloomy poetry . watch this movie be like a little slice of hell . it from austria and and it attempt to stumble along in the footstep of short cut and blue velvet scene about various character live in a suburban area with a dark underbelly . there the fat dog owner and his fat maid wife who stripteases for him and the skinny divorcee whose wife still live with him in a house that include the untouched room of his dead child and the über annoy woman hitchhiker who recite top ten list . the list go on . forever . much like the two hour plus i spent in that theatre . yes and the character interact and but not in a clever or interesting or even relevant way . i couldn not say if they be any good a actor and a and accord to the subtitle and they be give line that be the austrian equivalent of you be so lame . they certainly do not have to learn many and a each repeat his or her same line at least three time in a scene . this be no gummo and or any of the aforementioned movie . there be no art to discover and and nothing to dwell on afterwards except maybe whether or not you should change your never walk out during a movie policy ( which quite a few old couple do during a random orgy scene and if that sound appetizing and it not and unless youre one of few who doesn not find the idea of your parent have sex and with a few local middle age couple and to boot revolt ) . this movie be offensive to me . not the flabby nudity and not the cringe induce soundtrack and not the shockless scene involve gun . i be offend that someone actually spend money to make this when there be capable writer and filmmaker out there look for funding . i be offend that someone from out of town might have go to see dog day and come out wonder if that be the best u montrealers could find . most of all and i be offend that and somehow and the people involve with the festival dupe everyone into believe that the emperor have a gorgeous and mesmerise new outfit when it be painfully clear that he be as naked a the fat maid wife do a striptease . | 0neg |
what an appal piece of rubbish . who be all these people who blubber on about how good this be . yes and it arty while and yes and it foreign and but . that not enough . the plot be boring and disjointed and like a reality show but not so slickly make . the people be intrinsically uninteresting while but a character they do not have enough depth to feel empathy for them . if they be base on real people then i feel very and very sorry for them . the violence ( and some of it be very violent ) seem quite ostentatious and gratuitous . it like the producer have vision of be quenton tarantino . not that i think very much of him and either . and oh yes represent if i have neighbour like these and i would move . | 0neg |
this movie suck as . something about a heatwave in some european country and complete trash . there nothing go for this movie whatsoever . maybe 30 second of sex but that it . there be a very annoying chick who hitch ride with people and really piss me off . this movie be complete rash and you shouldn not subject yourself to watch it . i regret it it very bore . i would rate it zero but i can not . no body in their right mind should see this . i be sure you will regret it completely i do . how could they think up something this bad . even mystery men be well . mystery men . that suck . that movie wasn not worth be make . complete waste of time . the character in this be very hard to understand and i good very very very bored . | 0neg |
despite be a huge fan of fred astaire and ginger rogers movie and it wasn not until about 6 year ago that i first saw follow the fleet . i know all the song from an old astaire or rogers record ( yes and vinyl ) but know nothing of the plot . unfortunately and while the song be catchy and ginger rogers character be sweet and funny and you just can not like bake baker . while try to make up to his longtime partner and he continually sabotage her career . his character doesn not have the usual humour and elan of the other film astaire character . worth watch for the song and a great solo tap routine by ginger rogers . | 0neg |
it hard to believe that this be a sequel to henry fool . hard to believe that the same director and actor be involve in both movie . while henry fool be refresh and witty and comical and fay grim be slow and boring and and doesn not go anywhere . where have the wit go . i be baffle . it be 10 year since i saw henry fool and many of it dialog and scene be still vivid in my memory . fay grim be painful to watch . this be no fault of the actor and who be good ( parker posey ) or great ( jeff goldblum ) the blame lie entirely with the plot and the dialog and and even some of the filming ( low budget be no excuse ) . a huge disappointment . sorry i couldn not pay attention to the plot and i be so bored and so disappointed . if you enjoy this one you might not enjoy henry fool so much . the two movie have absolutely nothing to do with each other . there be no continuity in the character personality . it all a fraud to entice fan of henry fool to watch the sequel . i be switch this off now henry in some sort of jail with a taliban . | 0neg |
i say i would figure in that line because and frankly and i have not see a hal hartley movie until now . it not that i haven not hear of him though and a he be see a one of those small ny filmmaker ( when i say small i mean even small than jim jarmusch ) and who make ultra personal project on limited budget . in an ironic way and much a with pasolini salo and though in a slightly different context and fay grim interest me to see some of hartley more acclaimed feature and because there seem to be at least present some semblance of talent behind it and a if hartley could be a very good filmmaker who may be so good he just take a big experimental blunder . or and on the other hand and he could just be someone far too impressed with his own idiosyncrasy and would be godard like cinematic collision . i can not quite explain the story and which may or may not be a problem i suppose and however it not really in due to not have see the film that precede fay grim and henry fool . i think even if i have that experience it wouldn not make too much of a difference base on the final result . there a lot of international espionage and a double plot wrap inside of another that fall through the fake pocket of the title character and play in an aloof way by parker posey ( not sure if that good or bad either and maybe both ) and and also involve a cia operative ( jeff goldblum and a usual a solid presence amid the mania and even conjure some laugh ) and not to mention an orgy laden picture box and and author henry fool . it not that the script be totally impenetrable and however much it go into over extended loophole just for the sake of it and because there be some touch of witty or affectingly strange dialog . quite simply and the direction just suck . harltey be in love with the third man and which be fine and but he impose a consistently headache induce style of everything be tilt in angle and with character have to get into frame equally oddly . not since battlefield earth and in fact and have a director come off so annoyingly in try to make the unnecessary choice of titled angle for some bizarre dramatic effect and only this time hartley isn not amid a cluster f and he mostly responsible for it . this and along with the crazy wannabe godard title card that pop in here and there and some a little amusing and some just totally stupid and and the montage segment all in still shot and and a couple of moment involve action that almost call to mind ed wood and undermine any of the potential that be in the script and which be already fairly hard to decipher . in a way and it fascinate to watch how bad this all go and but a kind of fascination that come in see the flip side to total creative control on a sort of small scale story . but let it be know represent you will likely not come across a more wretchedly pretentious example of american independent film make this year . | 0neg |
i haven not see henry fool and but after watch fay grim i be not sure i want to . maybe hartley aim to be the anti thriller director he sure succeed with this yawner . base on the official description woman discover that her dead husband manuscript contain material that could pose a threat to national security i expect a taut geopolitical drama . instead i get flimsy structure and goofy dialog and flabby characterization and a convoluted plot and and a tone that shift so often it suggest that hartley change the script accord to his mood at any give time . i can hang for a long time with a frustrating and hard to follow plot ( e. g. duplicity ) because i figure that the loose end eventually will come together . even when they do not and or they do but they leave linger question ( e. g. duplicity ) and sharp writing and act can hold one interest . but half way through fay grim i reach a deadly realization i do not know what be go on and and i do not care . too bad and because i really like parker posey and reduce here to work with an absurd part that ask her to morph from indifferent and estrange wife and indifferent and clueless mother to tough and shrewd international player capable of psychological mano a mano with terrorist . there also bad casting . jeff goldblum can be very good and but he not capable of overcome miscasting a a cia operative . he look almost a uncomfortable in the role a i be watch him in it . his cia sidekick be bad while he look like a refugee from the quarterfinal of american idol ( be there really young cia agent with big lick of hair rakishly drape over their forehead . ) . then there the sticky question of the character age . goldblum be 54 when he make fay grim while thomas jay ryan and who play henry fool and be 44. neither be make to look or seem old than their actual age . yet and a key point in the story be that they serve a cia agent in nicaragua back in the 70 . goldblum character would have be in his 20 then while henry fool would have be a teenager . be hartley be quirky or lazy . the problem be too numerous to list . | 0neg |
this be a low budget spoof of the espionage genre . to help frame your expectation and you should know that represent ( 1 ) the acting be wildly heavy hand . the star be have great fun deliver their line with excessive eye movement and frequent hand gesture and and off key pacing . ( 2 ) the script deliberately lack continuity and plausibility . oftentimes line be abruptly jar and humorous because they have absolutely no relevance to previous plot element . ( 3 ) shot be frequently frame in off balance angle and poke fun at genre excess . ( 4 ) a pop eye jeff goldblum delivers complex and classically preposterous dialog in a winningly sarcastic manner . the film have a guiding intelligence and deliberately start with a plot element steal from the b film of the 1930 represent a secret code with a structure that would defy explanation by carl sagan . the film over the top acting be use mostly for comic effect during the first 90 minute . in an early running gag and fay grim son ned be so frequently tell to leave that you can not help chuckle while feel sorry for the lad . parker posey nicely choreograph fall from bed also help set a humorous tone early in the film . the film slow pacing do not enhance the comedy element or the drama elements that later emerge . the film impact a drama be significantly lessen by the early comedy . moreover and it be hard to be overly involve with the character and their fate when the early portion of the film be so sarcastic . the musical score be intentionally heavy hand and and i find this ( and the off kilter camera angle ) more irritating than humorous . the over the top acting and the implausible and nearly incomprehensible plot of conspiracy or counter conspiracy and and the slow pacing will grind on many viewer . the movie be much too long at 158 minute . that say and fan who be receptive to the film sarcasm might want to watch again . use close caption to best catch the intelligent ridiculousness of the dialog . the film be too slow for me and the sarcasm felt more heavy hand than light hearted . but and the comedy may well appeal to your taste . the film be worth a view for those who enjoy independent film and fan of director hal harley and or devotee of parker posey ( who have the most camera time ) . | 0neg |
first off and i really love henry fool and which put me in a very small pool of movie goer . parker posey be one of best actress on screen today . but this film be a full out travesty . watch hartley and the actor talk about the film in the extra so full of pride and and make pointless analogy to star war be stomach turning . this be hype on the producer part ( hdnet ) realize to the max . a true example of the emperor and his new clothes . mostly i feel that hal have spoil henry fool forever . i do not think i can ever see it again in it pure and innocent light . remember hal and you can fool some of the people some of the time . etc . the director would be nowhere today if all he do be churn out meaningless garbage . sadly and it a pure example of the lesson taught in the film adaptation . the story must be exciting and active and or it box office hope be dim indeed . never mind a decent story . for the actor and it be like try to act in a straitjacket . the score and i believe hartley and be tasteless . with drum hit walk all over dialog . there be one apple soundtrack loop i recognize that give me a smile . when i saw the trailer and i thought and oh and theyre just try to grab a new audience . but it really this ridiculous ride . i would be happy to spoil this movie for you and but it be do . it rotten . the fool franchise be dead . long live henry fool . | 0neg |
i have be a fervent hal hartley supporter since i saw his short survive desire in high school and and even then be still completely unmoored by his searingly brilliant henry fool . but this 10 year later sequel be not only unnecessary and it disgraceful . after a choppy and expeditious start and fay grim devolve into pseudo intellectualism and flat out boredom and and finally unwarranted and unwanted nihilism . and that just the plot . the majority of the new face be a frivolous and poorly develop a the movie represent one particularly flat character end up hog half the time we spend with the infamous henry fool himself and and it his only spoken scene in the film . jeff goldblum agent fulbright and it seem and be the only bright character ( a pun surely intend by hartley as well ) . how and then and be he leave . spoiler dead via a car bombing and easily make this the gentle natured hartley most violent film to date and and tonally all wrong in a film that already all wrong from the word go . a for the other new character and angus james and ned fool ( or be it grim . ) and not to mention fay herself . well and i would not spoil their fate and a the movie do a good enough job of that all on it own ( when it isn not busy itself with yet another godawful cant angle and which give the disconcert impression that hartley be move backwards from auteur to crappy film student ) . this piece be a complete disaster and a dreadful mess that isn not even good humor enough to revel in it messiness . instead it self indulgently cram the typically fun hipster pretense of it director into the real world and one uglier and meaner than it need be but not nearly ugly or mean enough to come close to have anything to say . in do so and hartley track sht all over my memory of these people and the marvelous world he originally create for them . i have rarely be so depressed at the movie and and i be count leave las vega and which at least developed fresh new character we grow to love before destroy them and instead of immediately disregard character already beloved . grim and indeed . | 0neg |
you must be kid . let entertain the possibility that parker posey be really an actress and and not just some entry in the quirk of the month club of actor . really and unless this be mean to be a tongue in cheek satire on david mamet terse and confuse dialog deliver alternately in machine gun rapidity or monotone ( think ben stein ) blandness or a flat out dry comedy while this film have get to be in the running for a rotten tomato award or bad . a if the stiff and uncomfortable posey weren not enough and we have get the stiffer and even more uncomfortable jeff goldblum . there more wood in this film than a toothpick factory . add to this already bizarre casting and be several other role and all populate by forgettable actor and who look or sound like escapee from america next top model and don pardo and or even the kid and who pronounce the word be like bean and which just bring our attention to the fact that there be so little to like about this film and we be analyze his accent to guess if he canadian or not . i think i laugh heartily in place that be suppose to be serious and and take seriously section that be mean to be humorous . even the soundtrack sound like a caricature of alarik jan music for mamet the house of game . if take a a spoof and the film be almost droll while if take seriously and just a self conscious piece of drek . | 0neg |
be warn . this movie be such a mess . it a catastrophe . don not waste your time with this one . i warn you . the acting and story and dialogue and music . basically everything be so over the top and it absolutely annoy and ridiculous . it make me want to throw up ( if the dialogue or act or story wasn not do it and it everyone be shoot crook ) . you will feel like youre watch a comedy . the problem be and the part that be supposedly funny isn not even funny . the acting and story and cinematography and you can feel everything be just try waaaay too hard but it never succeed . practically every shot be cant and but so what . this movie just feel like a student film . no wonder they shoot this in hd because it would be a waste to spend more money to shoot this on film . if youre easily amuse or like poor act and write and edit and direct and full of clichés and everything that force in your face and oh and do i mention poor acting . ( well and actually and it not all the actor fault it the director . ) then i guess you will like this movie . i have to watch this for a class . i would have turn it off right away if i could . if you still can not tell by now and i hat this movie . it make me want to throw up and get my time back . at least i do not have to pay for this garbage . jeff goldblum and you know . the guy from jurassic park or independence day and be in this movie but he sure go downhill from then accept role for movie like this catastrophe . | 0neg |
despite the lavish production number and wonderful costume this film be a chore to watch . the murder mystery plot be just a vehicle to mount the musical number on but it often bring the proceeding to a staggering halt besides not be very involve . although there have obviously be a lot of money spend on them the number be badly stag and poorly photograph . it obviously a pre code film because the girl often wear very little clothing and there even a song sing the praise of marijuana . the performance be all one note although it nice to see carl brisson in a musical but when victor mclaglen and a the police lieutenent and lurch into view for the umpteenth time on the hunt for clue and you may want to throw in the towel or at least fast forward to the next number . pity the patron who be trap in the cinema on it release though . | 0neg |
i use to always love the bill because of it great script and character and but lately i feel a though it have turn into an emotional type of soap . if you look at promotional picture or poster of the bill now you will see either two of the officer hug or kiss or something to do with friendship whereas promotional picture of the bill a long time ago would have show something to do with crime . this prove that it have change a lot from be an absolutely amazing police drama to an average type of television soap . when i watch it i feel like i be watch a police version of coronation street or something similar . i have to say i still like the bill a i be interested in police work and that type of thing but i really miss the greatness that the bill use to have . i want to rate it a 2 out of ten because you have to admit it have be totally ruin by the people who take the bill over . a for the script and character they have both go downhill and most of the great character be go now ( although a few still remain i think ) and i be not say that the new character be poor or anything because they definitely aren not and it just that they lack the tough look and personality and script line that all of the old character use to have because most of the new one be at the moment involve with silly relationship and family trouble . overall be one of the only police program on television these day and the bill will always be a crappily interesting thing to watch and but like i say it have lose a lot of it uniqueness ( if thats the right spelling ) and would now be class a a terrible and unreal television soap . recommend to watch for a good laugh over the stupidity of the police officer involve negative . | 0neg |
veteran sleazeball bruno mattei be at it again with this erotic thriller that clearly echo joel schumacher 8mm . but and a expect and mattei do his movie on a minuscule budget so that it already look obscure when it newly release . after her daughter get abduct and a mother enter the dark world of underground pornography and because the kidnapper belong to an international organization that direct snuff film as long a the exclusive client pay well . the search for her daughter do not only lead the mother across europe and but also into prostitution . she go to bed with some guy to get her clue . when she finally reach contact with the snuff organization lead by the mysterious doctor hades and she get into great danger herself . there be not much good to say about this one and even though it start promise . problem be that the movie be by far not a sleazy or explicit a one might expect from the director who make film like blade violent . snuff trap ( which be first release in russia . ) be neither gory enough nor do it contain the amount of nudity and sex to really keep the viewer attention . the plot isn not that special either and except maybe for the surprisingly many different location throughout europe . the end be hugely disappointing . the act isn not really remarkable either and except for anita auer who play doctor hades represent she look and act extremely creepy . you do not want to meet her like this in a dark alley ( or your bedroom and for that matter ) . all in all and snuff trap only appeal to collector of bruno mattei film . but it good to see the man back on the helm again represent it be his first thriller since 1994 giallo gli occhi dentro . | 0neg |
this film be terrible . every line be steal from 8mm ( the italian dub version and at least ) . if you like trash . real trash and give it a try while but beware represent this ain not the so bad it good kind of flick . in it cheapness and it may really look like a porno but and believe me and if youre look for snuff and s and m and hardcore and softcore . or even an ordinary erotic thriller and go find something else in store . i be tell you this and cause the absolutely uninspired and unconvincing shooting and acting and plot and dialogue ( the only good line and a i say before and be the one they steal from joel schumacher 8mm . ) will bore you to tear in a few minute and the happy end be absolutely revolt . i will give it one star represent a half for the sudden shot in the back scene and after the eye of the victim monologue ( steal from 8mm as well ) and a half for mom and daughter sexy body ( that do not manage to keep me completely awake while watch this turkey and anyway . ) . | 0neg |
unfortunately the only spoiler in this review be that there nothing to spoil about that movie . even if b. mattei have never do any master piece he use to do his job with a bit of humor and craziness that make him a fun eurotrash director . but for the last 10 year he seem to have lose it . this film be just empty and nothing at all to wake u up from the deep sleep you sink into after the first 10 min . no sex and no blood ( it suppose to be about snuff . ) and no actor and no dialog and just as bad a an 90t . v film . it even bad than his last cannibal and zombie epic . so rest in peace bruno and you will stay in our mind forever anyway and thanks to such unforgettable gem a representzombi 3 and robowar and rat and laltro inferno and virus and cruel jaw and few others . so except if you want to see b mattei possess by jess franco spirit new film and pas on this one . but if you do not know this nice artisan career track down his old film and have fun . | 0neg |
a cheap exploitation film about a mother search for her daughter who have be kidnap by people who make snuff porno film . the trail lead the mother all over europe a she search for her child and we in the audience struggle to stay asleep . this be one of the countless soft core sleaze film that be make for people who want the excitement of porno with out the stigma or danger of it show up on their credit card bill . personally i would rather have the stigma since those film tend to be more interesting and honest about what be see . this be suppose to be a sexy thriller but it not . mostly it people talk about thing follow by lot of walk from place to place and lead to lead . periodically through out the film various people get undressed and everything have more than a touch of s and m to the proceeding . the violence and fetish material be of the sort to provoke laughter rather than horror or even excitement and it all so incredibly fake . bad there be not even enough nudity to keep it interesting . ( basically par for the course for many of these film ) you will forgive my lack of detail but it simply be a dull boring film that i stay with to the end hop for something remotely prurient to occur and but there be nothing . the most interesting thing be the blonde haired villainess with the huge over bite and nose the size of a buick . i watch her with morbid fascination wonder what she have look like a a young girl and wonder whether she have have plastic surgery and not the type of thing you should be think about in a gripping thriller . avoid . | 0neg |
well what can i say and there be b grade movie and there be b grade movie and this definitely fall into the latter . however since it obvious that even the maker of the film know that it not a credible movie ( take a look at the closing credit ) it can be forgive . the plot be basically a convict psycho killer be kill . he accidentally have his genetic material mix up with some experimental acid that get combine and then lose in the snow . the killer now take on the form of a snowman if you can believe that . the snowman and jack frost and be after the country town sherif who put him behind bar . in do so and jack frost end up kill half the town . this movie lack any real scare and the effect alone remind me of the b grade movie of the 50 . this alone make it worth watch for a laugh . a movie to pass the time away . | 0neg |
i may not be a critic and but here be what i think of this movie . well just watch the movie on cinemax and first of all i just have to say how much i hate the storyline i mean come on what do a snowman scare besides little kid and secondly it be pretty gory but i bet since the movie be so low budget they probably use ketchup so my critical vote be bomb . nice try and the sequel will suck twice as much . | 0neg |
and this movie have cross it . i have never see such a terrible movie in my life . i mean and a kid head get cut off from the force of an empty sled . a snowman with a costume that have the seam clearly visible . this be a pitiful excuse for a movie . | 0neg |
it not just the plot alone that make this movie an instant turn off for bored audience . it the terrible direction with a horrible script and mistake leave and right that make this too agonizing to watch . i be sorry but i do not see the fun in this . just the thrill of point the many mistake and stupid one liner . well i be wonder how dumb the director think of their produce company when this movie be first introduce . probably as dumb a that sheriff who dive into the pickup truck full of antifreeze with a gap bloody wound . oops . do i forget to mention this sheriff not only a poor actor but also can shrug off an impalement with a load of antifreeze drench the expose flesh . i guess he kind of forgot when he win a not so thrilling victory over the snowman . | 0neg |
you know what kind of movie youre get into when the serial killer main character be be transport to the electric chair ( in what seem to be a bakery truck ) and only to have the prison vehicle collide with ( and i be not make this up ) a genetic engineering tanker truck . the goo which spurt forth melt him and and fuse his dna with the snow and create our protagonist and the killer snowman . my favorite portion of the movie and however and be an over the shoulder shot of the snowman thrash some poor schmuck and in which his hand look suspiciously like a couple of white oven potholder glove . mmmmm and schlock . | 0neg |
the 1998 michael keaton kiddie comedy of the same title be roundly condemn for it and um and shoddy special effect and but compare to what scream mad george cook up for this horror comedy theyre positively mind boggle . the killer snowman seem to be make out of styrofoam and his arm look like oversized oven mitt . which they probably be . the cast lay it on thick in this parody of dozen of other ( much bad ) movie and paul keith a the town doctor be particularly memorable in a small but hilarious role . | 0neg |
boy this movie have me fool . i honestly think it would be a campy horror film with absolutely no humor in it whatsoever and boy i get the cold shoulder that time . this movie be and and i be truthful and pretty damn good . it be not scary at all but the campiness and the sly humor really mad this movie interesting . some to the horrible acting and cliché killing be so painful to watch and i almost laugh at how bad it be and but to some extent i enjoy it . the killing all vaguely relate to snow sport and christmas and which make thing more intriguing . the pov camera angle be awesome . the movie be about a viscous killer who die in a car accident collision with a chemical truck while be transport to prison . he be later resurrect in that very same chemical with snow splice into the mixture . these be the ingredient choose to make the perfect killer snowman . he than take his revenge and a the snowman and on the police officer who convict him . this movie have such bad acting and with the exception of christopher allport and that be be funny . i will say that i be also pretty disappointed that this movie be not a horror and but in fact a dark sitcom . they have a great story with a good plot but it wasn not execute right . all in all i like the movie at first but now it be really annoying . but this movie be way well and darker than the sequel . | 0neg |
a serial killer dy in a snowstorm and get mutate into frosty the snowman evil twin . then go on a killing spree . interesting plot . sound scary . and it be scary . if youre five year old . otherwise and it kind of cheesy . i saw it on cable and i be glad i do not pay money to see it . it have all the charm and style of a low budget movie which may become a cult film . i be sure it have a loyal fan base somewhere . i be just not in it . even though i do not like the movie a a whole and there be some scene i find amuse . such a the bathtub scene and the post explosion scene with the picasso reference . it be also enjoyable to watch the many way the hero try to kill jack and he just doesn not seem to want to die . in short and jack frost be a good low budget b movie comedy and but a bad low budget b movie horror . | 0neg |
jack frost and no kid it not the warm hearted family movie about a dad who come back from the dead in the form of a snow man . it about a sadistic killer name jack frost who be spray with some acid fluid and be morph into a killer snow man . i happen to catch a copy of this movie so i could have a nice sit back and laugh at it . a killer snow man . ha and sound like the perfect comedy or horror movie . well i be wrong and very wrong . jack frost be about a killer who be be transport via truck to jail so he could fry in the chair at midnight . but it a snowy night and it collide with a government tanker carry a new dna fluid . jack escape only to be burn to death by the acid and morphs into a killer snowman . he return to the small town of snowmonton where he be catch by a small time sheriff . here he be ready to kill again and now a a snow man with cooler power . he can condense into water and shoot out ice cycle a spear and and grow killer fang . the only question be and who can stop frost . this movie be below the typical b movie line . the movie begin cheesy but as soon a jack be burn by the acid and it quickly drop below the cheese line and go flat . the act for one be appal . here we have a whole cast of unheard of actor who either can not act and can act but have a pointless character and or be just here for a few extra buck . the only good actor be scott macdonald who play jack . he look like a young richard kiel combine with frankenstein . sadly his appearance be only reduce to three minute and all we ever see of him be his new snow man form and his wise cracking voice . plus his wisecrack be anything but funny . groaning and stupid and and bad . the plot be horrible . throughout history there have be numerous murderer . a killer in a hockey mask and a killer with a razer glove and a chainsaw wield moron and a rapid st. bernard and but now we stoop to a tacky killer snow man . oh come on . and the way the character be introduce be terrible . for one i really want jack to kill the sheriff son and i mean give his dad oat with antifreeze in them so they would not freeze . all the character be dumb and pointless and the death be to cartoony . one woman in strangle with christmas light and have her head smash into a decoration box and a girl be hump to death in the shower ( where be the carrot in that scene eh . ) . and to top of this horrible movie be the special effect . the first big special effect we have be jack dna mixing in with snow and boy be it terrible . i mean it look like a 60 fashion of art design and pu . jack look fake as well . he look like a person cover with rubber snow man skin . all the blood and gore be cheesy and the film never take off with greatness but instead stoop to low level . jack frost be one of the bad slasher movie ever make . i think it would be a riot but no . it doesn not try to be funny and it actually try to be scary . jack frost get 4 out of 10 and it at least make me laugh from it awfulness . don not even bother with this piece of trash . jack frost equal d plus . | 0neg |
i be so happy and surprise that there be so much interest in this movie . jack frost be my introduction into the film produce and distribute by a pix entertainment and and without exception and everything this company deal with be pure crap . first and and this be very important and never ever watch this movie sober . why would you . unlike many other entertaingly bad movie and this one i feel be make intentionally bad . i just can not get over how fake the snowman be and which be why it always show only briefly and the way it move be the best . this movie be waaaaaaaaaaay good than the michael keaton piece of crap and becuz that be make too be a good movie and and that version be as bad a this . | 0neg |
this be the crappiest film i have ever see but in all fairness it watchable and rather funny . i do not think the film maker intend it to be your typical hollywood blockbuster quality . it just a stupid film about a serial killer who get douse in a load of toxic waste cause a reaction with him and the snow ( a it the middle of winter ) . he then turn into a killer snowman which be enough to to make you laugh on it own . this film be really stupid but it funny . the killing be hilarious . i wouldn not advise you to go and buy it ( like i do the cover look good . ) but if it happen to be on tv one night and youre up for a laugh then stick it on . | 0neg |
this movie may be the bad movie i have ever see . basically it be right above leprachaun 5 and the only difference be that it miss ice t. the scene where he do the chick with the carrott . priceless . oh yeah they make a second one and genius . | 0neg |
this movie and no correction and this thing and this abysmal abomination from the burn pit of hell should have be kill before it even leave the writer head . i could not possibly come up with enough adjective to describe this movie . but let try anyway . horrible and bad and nauseating and tasteless and crap and vomit inducing and gut wrenchingly bad and hideous and nasty and putrid and there just aren not enough word in the english language . the plot involve a serial killer who become a snow man . don not ask how and not important . the killer snowman run about kill people . how and you may ask and can a snowman kill someone . in tasteless way that make you want to remove your eye if only so you do not have to endure that styrofoam snowman anymore . in way that make you want to fill your ear with hot wax so you do not have to endure his snow pun anymore . don not watch this movie . destroy it on sight . for the sake of your very soul do not watch it . | 0neg |
whoever make this movie must have do it a a joke . i mean and this be the stupid movie i think i have ever see . a killer snowman terrorize a small town . give me a break . love it when he take off drive the cop car . more like a comedy than a horror movie . if you want a laugh and rent this . if you truly want a horror movie and stay the hell away from this one . | 0neg |
a friend and clearly with no taste or class and suggest i take a look at the work of ron atkins . if this be representative of his oeuvre and i never want to see anything else by him . it be amateurish and self indulgent and criminally shoddy and self indulgent rubbish . the whore mangler of the title be an angry low budget filmmaker who murder a bunch of hooker . there be a little nudity and some erection and but no single element could possibly save this from the hangman noose . the lighting be appal and the dialog be puerile and mostly shout and and the direction be clueless . i saw a doco on american exploitation filmmaker during the recent fangoria convention . atkins be one of those feature . he speak like there be something important about his work and but after a viewing of this and i see nothing of any import whatsoever . there be no style and either and and the horrible video effect ( like solarization ) only enhance the amateurishness . not even so bad it fun . avoid . | 0neg |
director ron atkins be certifiably insane . this ultra low budget film chronicle a few day in the life of one harry russo ( john giancaspro and who also co write ) and a nut job who receive a rubberneck doll from his bitch girlfriend . he start to take order from the doll to take massive amount of drug and rape and kill and not always in that order . what start off a be a ball to the wall exploitation film and well stay like that and but it get very repetitive very fast . i be lean more toward the certifiably insane . it be hard to forget once see though . kinda like if tom green ever do a horror film . my grade representf eye candy represent laurie farwell get fully nude while jasmin putnam show tit and bush anti eye candy represent see john completely naked repeatedly . | 0neg |
i be interested to see the move thinking that it might be a diamond in the rough and but the only thing i find be bad writing and horrible directing ( the shot sequence do not flow ) even though the director might say that that be what he be go for and it look very uninspired and immature ) the editing could have be do by anyone with 2 vcr and the stock be low budget video . i would say that it wasn not even something as simple a mini digital video . there be some simple way to fix a film with what the director have and like through edit etc . but it be obvious that he just doesn not care . there be as much effort put in to this movie a a ham sandwich . it could be make well and but that would mean extra work . | 0neg |
there be bad movie and then there be the movie that be so bad and that they become almost art . this be one of those film . my partner and i be still both kind of shell shock and you know and star off into space and drooling . you can tell that the people involve ( i hope they change their name to protect themselves ) be have a blast and and they definitely weren not shy . i give this one a three out of ten just because of the gratuitous smut and really bad gore effect . i laugh out loud during most of the movie and so i guess you could say that it show me a good time . beware viewer and the above word in no way construe that this be a good film and because it be not . all i can say in my defense and be that it be impossible to pass up a movie with such a great title . | 0neg |
schizophreniac represent the whore mangler be another example of what happen when you get a bunch of untalented people together to make an extreme horror film . any sort of acting and production and storyline and fx and etc . go out the window in an effort to create shock value . now do not get me wrong i consider myself a connoisseur of shock film and and the sleazier or gorier or nasty the good but it still nice to see some sort of talent from someone involve in the film . schizophreniac chronicle the life of harry russo a drug addict freak show who take order to kill from his ventriloquist dummy and rubberneck . he go on a few spree kill hooker and other random people and and scream about how much he hat hoo uhs ( that whore for those of you that do not speak new york ese . ) and how he want to rape them in the as . there be a few weak necrophilia scene and very little gore and and some nudity to mix thing up a bit but nothing that you haven not see in a good film . the only redeeming thing that i can find in this retarded film be the often ( unintentionally . ) hilarious scream fit from our main man and harry . he go on and on and on about want to kill everyone and do them in the as and and it really become quite comical after a while . in fact and i be almost tempt to believe that there suppose to be some sort of homo erotic undertone to this film and with all the as talk and constant shot of harry run around with his dong hangin out . in all honesty and that joker be nekkid more in this film then the few chick that show some t and a ( and some full frontal and for good measure ) . schizophreniac be mildly amusing a a 1 time watch and but i can really only recommend this to those that want to be able to say that they watch a film call schizophreniac represent the whore mangler . to be honest the title and by far be the best thing about this trash . a generous 3 . 5/10 . | 0neg |
well and i like to be honest with all the audience that i buy it because of kira sex scene and but unfortunately i do not see much of them . all sex scene be short and do in haphazard manner along with all the weird and corny background music just like all other b movie it just doesn not look much like two people have sex . there be a tiny bit of plot toward the end kira new lover be a killer . whoa . how shocking . why do not we nominate this movie for oscar award . i can not imagine how bad the movie would look like if it be r rat ( mine be import from uk and rat 18 ) . conclusion . put it down and walk away and so yon would not end up with be a moron like me . score represent negative . | 0neg |
lose control be another offering in the erotic thriller genre which could be consider a the pulp fiction of the film world . usually and they involve a roundabout route to murderous intent and intersperse with copious disrobe . this be not a complaint and especially when it be do by the stunningly beautiful woman who invariably inhabit this make believe world . kim ward ( kira reed ) be suffer a bout of writer block . just by chance and ( or be it . ) she meet a man ( doug jeffery ) who engage with her in ever more risky sexual encounter . the man refuse to divulge any information about himself and yet kim steadfastly refuse to stop the affair . her agent and alexa ( anneliza scott ) think it will do wonder for her book sale . a in most film of this type and the denouement come near the end but some thing do not add up . i have see enough of this kind of film to think and no change there and then but i like them . they be so undemanding . performance of the cast vary . doug jeffery carry the film a the psycho or sociopath you do not want to cross . kira reed look good but fail to convince a the woman in peril . clay greenbush a the pi do not convince either . finally and a note of caution about the dvd under review . both the cover and the disc state r rat and run time a 93 minute but the run time be less than 86 minute . this probably explain why the sex scene appear truncate and why jennifer ludlow performance be cut short just a she get start . 4 star . | 0neg |
personally i think this show look pretty cheaply make . some of the actor be terrible . they over do it and seem fake . i can always tell how it go to end within the first 10 minute or less of watching because they make it so transparently clear . it not very well write either . i love to watch it to laugh at it . you know the say it so bad that it good . well and that say applies to this show . i also like to watch just to see if i be right when i guess how it all go to end . so far i have be right every time . it like a little game that i play . it nice when you be bore and you feel like laugh at something . | 0neg |
wow . simply awful . i be a fan of the original movie and and begrudgingly sit through part 2 and 3 be and improvement . 4 and 5 and freddy dead be pretty bad . but nothing be as bad a freddy nightmare . freddy act a a rod serlingesq host of this anthology series . i can accept how freddy become one punchline after another and but at least in the movie the appeal of freddy carry the movie and but here these be so poorly make and they look like high school production of a horror series . the poor actor and if you really want to call yourself that after do this show be obviously exactly what they pay for . i be nearly certain this be a stopping point for two type of actor . one just start on the hollywood ladder and brand new willing to take any part that would put off their have to take that porn job they be offer last week and or season actor on their way down the hollywood ladder willing to take any part that would put off their have to take that porn job they be offer last week . i half expect dana plato to guest star and but she be already dead by the time this be in production . to paraphrase nancy line in the original elm st and what ever you do try not to fall asleep watch this . | 0neg |
this be my first movie review on imdb . i be force to register after watch this movie . i can not in good conscience allow this movie to be unreviewed by me . the people must be warn . first of all and my rating be represent 0 ( a in zero ) i love jack black and ben stiller and rachel wei and and christopher walken and and yet and i hat this movie . there be a plot and but who care when there no script . the dialogue be unreal and plain boring and the situation be contrive and the flow of event be slow and somewhat arbitrary and the character be unsympathetic and uninteresting and and the story and although base on a good premise and be stupid . this movie be a piece of poo . never mind waste money on this movie and it not even worth your time spend watch it . please do not see it . i beg of you . | 0neg |
this could be look at in many different way . this movie suck and it good or it just plain weird . the third one probably explain this movie best . it have strange theme and just have a strange plot . so who else but christopher walken would play in this no matter how bad and average or even how good it might be . the acting be what you would expect especially out of ben stiller . jack black i have always like so you know what you will get out of him but this be not bad . christopher walken be always off the wall . he be always enjoyable to watch no matter how bad the movie be . comedy wise it be somewhat funny . this of course meaning that it do have it moment ( though very few ) but can get a little over top here and there which make me feel like the movie be just desperate for laugh but of course not in a good way . the directing be average as well . barry levinson be a slightly overrate director and really do not do a good job here . this movie seem that it have a lot more potential and he do not do much to reach it . just very average and do not seem like a lot of effort be put into make this film . the writing be the key to a good comedy . obviously that mean the write here fail . at best it be below average . consider it do have it moment it be not too horrible . that be never a good thing to say about a movie though . if not for christopher walken and it stupid ridiculous end i would have give it a low rating . he be always quite a character in his movie . stil this be just a whack out strange movie with strange character that really do not go anywhere . not completely horrible but i would not really recommend it though because it be a very forgettable movie . | 0neg |
this have to be the most brutally unfunny comedy i have ever see in my life . ben stiller and jack black and and christopher walken a a crazed homeless man cant make me laugh . something get to be wrong with this picture . this be the only movie i have ever felt like walk out of . i use free pass and and still felt like i want my money back . i can wholeheartedly say that the only movie i have ever see bad than this one be house of the dead . the . only . bad . movie . i laugh very slightly at the merry go round scene and and that it . spend 2 hour in something bill a a comedy should get you more than one laugh and right . i do not know and i guess the filmmaker think that flan be a funny word and or something . and the other run joke really be beat a dead horse literally . | 0neg |
i couldn not wait to put this movie in my dvd player when i rent it . then after i start it and i couldn not wait to get it out of my dvd player . actually i watch all of the movie . my wife and i keep wait and wait for something funny to happen and but nothing funny ever do . the box read like the it would be really funny . the premise of the movie sound good . ben stiller be funny . jack black be funny . how could this movie miss . well . it do miss . this be the unfunniest comedy i have ever watch . nobody i have talk with thought it be even slightly funny . it be just a really lame movie . trust me . avoide it . avoide it . | 0neg |
envy be bad for a number of reason . yes and there be unlikeable character . that not the problem . it be that they be unlikeable and we do not care for them at all . the war of the rose feature unlikeable character but due to proper introduction we grow to at least find ourselves interested in their fate and whereas in envy the introduction be thin and the character be never believable and and the plot only make thing bad . ben stiller be simply repulsive in his role and i be a fan of his work most of the time . stiller campaign to have this release straight to video and now i can see why . the movie propose that he best friend with jack black and but from the first five minute we be give footage that seem to indicate stiller hate black . i think this would develop into some sort of one side relationship ( a la the cable guy ) but it never do and instead stiller insist he his best friend and i felt confuse a he seem to treat black like and well and poo . the movie plot be ridiculous but it doesn not matter and because it suppose to be an exaggerated morality tale . unfortunately the message be lose in the mess . walken give a good performance but black be off key and annoy ( and i usually find him very funny ) . no and it not a horrible film but i still can not believe barry levinson ( rain man and sleeper ) be responsible for this it not one of the bad film of all time but it could certainly be a whole lot well . i wish va poo rize do exist so we could make this film disappear forever . | 0neg |
i admit to like a lot of the so called frat pack movie . no matter how bad they be and i can find something to like about ben stiller or owen wilson or vince vaughn or will ferrell or jack black . but envy just leave me about as cold a the white horse that ben dispose of . this time and it ben and jack black a a couple of nutty neighbor and one of whom ( black ) discover a aerosol spray to make animal poop disappear and become incredibly wealthy while the other ( stiller ) writhe in envy . that supposedly the plot and but then it veer off in other direction that do not really make much sense . i guess the vapoorize thing be sort of amuse at first . the problem be and they try to sustain the gag for the whole picture ( black have a license plate that read caca king ) and it get fairly tiresome . but even ben and jack be use poorly while the energy level for both of their performance seem significantly dial down . the two best performance by far be rachel weisz and chris walken . walken neo hippie dippie guy be so offbeat and so well modulate a performance that it really never suggest any of walken other familiar nutcase character . it completely unique and yet come across a unmistakably walken . and weisz be about the best actress in the business that nobody know about . even with limited screen time and she still dominate every scene she in . the whole crux of the so called drama be that ben and in a jealous drunken stupor and accidentally shoots jack prize white stallion and and then go to ridiculous length to cover it up and fear his best friend will find out and cut him dead . but the plot twist isn not believable because there nothing about jack character to indicate that he would do such a thing . he play such a sweet guy that it render the whole excruciating horse chase null and void . you discount it completely . it all filler . and what the point of the out of control merry go round and except that barry levinson want u to know that he see stranger on a train . the screenplay be painfully bad and the acting of the two lead poorly direct . someone with levinson track record should know good . maybe someone will invent something to make this film disappear . oh and wait and they already have . | 0neg |
how can barry levinson possibly assemble white hot comedy talent ben stiller and jack black and the gorgeous rachel weisz and old pro christopher walken and still deliver such a humourless stinker . stiller and black be friend until the latter invents a spray to make dog mess vanish and become a conspicuous consume multi millionaire . the premise be thin but sound enough in the right hand to have be a springboard for some great bitching between the two star but all concerned overplay every hand and every chance they can . stiller and black be simply not funny for way too much of the time and weisz look sensational a always but be criminally underused and and with the exception of walken a a batty barfly who urge stiller character to take revenge and it a turgid trudge to the end of this strained farce . | 0neg |
start with the script . i have see cartoon with more depth than envy . anytime character keep repeat what you have already see and and be not funny the first time and a movie be in deep trouble and which envy certainly be . a movie that rely on one joke have well have somewhere to go with it . here we have a film that go absolutely nowhere . christopher walken especially would like to forget this bomb and because his character be so weak . ben stiller have be in some pretty good black comedy and flirt with disaster and and duplex and immediately come to mind . be certain that envy be not a black comedy . there be no double meaning and just total nonsense . envy deserve it low rating and because like it subject matter and it stink . merk . | 0neg |
i can not say much about this film . i think it speak for itself ( a do the current rating on here ) . i rent this about two year ago and i totally regret it . i even or try or to like it by watch it twice and but i just couldn not . i can safely say that i have absolutely no desire to see this waste of time ever and ever again . and i be not one to trash a movie and but i truly believe this be awful . it wasn not even funny in the slightest . the only bit i enjoy be the few scene with christopher walken in them . i think this film ruin both jack black and ben stiller for me . all i can think of when i see one of their film now a day be this terrible movie and and it remind me not to waste my money . amy poehler be so very annoying and too . overall and well and i think you get my point . the star be for walken and by the way . | 0neg |
please and someone stop ben stiller from act in any movie . write the studio and hell and write your local congressman even . i have get more laugh go to a funeral then i have watch any stiller flick . jack black try to make something about a comedy about disappear dog crap and and christopher walken and perhaps on of the great actor of his generation and simply look embarrass to be there . stiller be his unfunny self and but now even with someone to bail him out and prove that he be way overrate a a comic . it no wonder why this movie tank badly and and be available of the dollar movie theater after only a handful of week . i warn you and and you must warn your friend and do not watch this flick and it be just awful and bad then gothika ( personally and i would never think i would say that ) and worst the plan 9 and worst the ishtar and bad then the golden child . please hollywood and quit allow ben stiller in your movie and he not funny and he a god awful actor and and he bring others down with him . the following film be rank 1 because there be no negative score allow and so while the board say one and i will give it a zero . | 0neg |
it seem that the people behind envy realise that recent comedy especially one involve ben stiller and to a less degree jack black have be situation spoof and which have steadily decline in originality and generally laugh . i find the sheer absurdity of zoolander utterly hilarious when it be release and starsky and hutch be also enjoyable and and then dodgeball keep the laugh go for a lot of people and although personally i be a bit tired of the over the top character especially when the scenario wasn not quite so funny ( perhaps the comedy of a dodgeball tournament doesn not quite translate to australia and where it rarely play ) . so in an attempt to do something a little more original and envy move away from an absurd scenario and instead revolves around the absurd creation of jack black character ( i would not spoil what it be for those who intend to see the movie ) . the problem be that the movie seem to drag and i be not a big enough movie buff to be able to think of example and but it seem like this set up have be do a thousand time before and very rarely successfully . so instead of a nice and crisp and enjoyable and fresh comedy and you get a film that seem to just go through the motion . sure the motion can be quite amusing and and theyre centre on an idea that be quirky enough to provide a few laugh especially with jack black play the excited and amusing and though a bit 2d and creator . ben stiller on the other hand seem a bit lost and he ask to play a fuller role than the ridiculous character of his zoolander breed of movie and but he struggle a a family man and whether his fault or the script and there isn not enough depth to the character and the result be a movie of ben stiller do those typical mannerism and generally become tedious . the performance doesn not leave an imprint on the viewer ( he just ben stiller and jack black manage to actually portray a character though not a challenge one ) . the last annoying element of the movie be christopher walken role a the j man and which be about as typical and two dimensional a character come and and naturally he become monotonous and frustrating very quickly . it really not as unbearable a some people would have you think and it watchable and especially if youre in the right mood ( feel silly would be a good prerequisite for see this film ) . hire it on a movie night with friend and watch it after you have watch a scary film and feel like something light hopefully you will also be somewhat tipsy by then too . in that scenario i can imagine it would be quite enjoyable and but generally it provide too few laugh to carry itself and most of the time just drags along . | 0neg |
i usually like comedy movie . i really enjoy them . but i do not really get the point of envy . i mean and it have a dull content or topic and and it not really funny . although the acting be generally good and it not enough for the movie to get at least a bit interesting . stiller and black do not show all their talent in this movie . so and if youre about to rent a comedy and i suggest you definitely do not go for this one . unless you want to get bore and and i can see i be not the only one with this opinion and because even jack black apologize for it ( take a look at trivia ) . | 0neg |
this be the bad movie i have ever see . i be not kid . the next time it come on and i will just continually run my head into a wall . it would me more enjoyable to sit in an emergency room try to explain to a doctor why my brain be swell than attempt to make it through this movie again . i hope that black and still never work together on a project this bad again . they be both good comedian and so i be shock this be so awkward . if they have to do it all over again and i be pretty sure that they would decide to not do it . the folk that front the money and must have lose a ton . not really because the special effect ( all 2 of them ) be terrible . | 0neg |
stupid . stupid . stupid . i can not stand ben stiller anymore . how this man be allow to still make movie be beyond me . i can not understand how this happen if i perform at work the way he act in a movie i would get fired and i own the company . i would have to fire myself . god . this movie be just a plain and steaming and stink pile of poo and that need to be vapoorized if that be possible . something else i have to say the guideline about 10 line of text in a comment be idiotic . what be wrong with just say a few thing about a movie . i will never understand why site will require a short novel write when sometimes a brief comment be all that be necessary . | 0neg |
i watch envy two night ago and on dvd and at a friend house . the premise of this film be quite promising and jack black and ben stiller in a comedy with a lot of potential and but it completely fail to deliver . i watch it with about five friend and no one laugh for the entire film . the joke ( which be few and far between ) be not funny in any way . the story line be crap and and they never answer the question . where do the sht go . of course the answer to that be no one care . this film lack any sort of comedy value and and a a few other user have say the only thing that make it even almost worth watching be christopher walken a the j man . none of the character be develop and the plot so thin it nearly transparent and be that song throughout the film suppose to be funny . | 0neg |
envy star some of the best . jack black and ben stiller and amy poehler and and the great christopher walken . with such a cast and one can only expect the best . however and with envy and no one could save this disaster . tim dingman ( stiller ) and nick vanderpark ( black ) be best friend and co worker at a sandpaper factory . both be make a decent living and but because tim have a good performance at work and he able to afford more than his buddy nick . nick be a dreamer who always come up with new idea for invention . one day and nick come up with the idea for a spray can that make dog poop disappear ( yes and i be serious ) . fall in love with the idea and nick decides to really invent this product . he make an offer to tim to invest in his idea and share the profit 50/50 . tim refuse think the idea will never work . nick invention and title va poo rize ( again and i be serious ) and end up make million . he enjoy spend his money on thing like a much large house and a horse and a personal trainer and and fancy desert . tim start feel envy for nick . hence the name of the movie . the concept isn not bad and but it still turn out awful . this movie contain some of the bad dialog and very poor performance from all the cast . then again and a i mention earlier and none of them could save this mess . not even the great christoper walken and play a homeless character name j man and make this movie funny . the movie be bad from the start and only continue to get bad . i recommend this movie if represent you like crap ( no pun intend ) you want to see jack black in a white tuxi say and avoid this movie at all cost and but avoid especially if represent youre offend by bathroom humor you love animal . | 0neg |
i saw this movie last night and even after a couple of beer the only giggle this movie get out of me be when i realize that i be actually watch it . in a word and it be unfunny . unfunny . i totally believe the trivia tidbit about jack black apologizing for make this garbage . i can not believe that barry levinson do not just toss this script when he read the first page . moreover and i can not believe that i watch more than ten minute of it . i give it negative because i love to see christopher walken make terrible movie for the paycheck . also and the horse corky and by merely exist a a character in this movie and be actually quite ridiculous . | 0neg |
i be not sure what . i just couldn not laugh at it . i have an open mind . i do not want to be a tight @ s about it . but i seriously just couldn not laugh at this film . it be just not funny to me . some part it seem like ben stiller and jack black try too hard . just because you put two very funny men together doesn not mean that this be go to be an excellent comedy . some movie just shouldn not be make . this be one of them . because it do a lot of old joke and the acting be just stupid . i know and i know it a comedy . sort of at least . but i be just not impressed . i be sorry and but i can not give this anything low than a two . and that all i be give . negative . | 0neg |
i do not envy barry levinson and rachel weisz and ben stiller or jack black for do this film . it and in one word and boring . maybe the fact that be too predictable and the more than exploit ben stiller loser role or the not at all funny scene make this film just something to forget . even christopher walken appearance finish in a pathetic way . i be very disappointed . i love ben stiller act . i love it in most of his film and the last one i saw before this be duplex with drew barrymore and be not that bad . about jack black . well and apart from high fidelity i have never see him do something good . what about school of rock . ooops and frightening . | 0neg |
jack black character and tim dingman the dreamer in envy and find wealth and success in the idea of a aerosol spray vapoorize that when spray on doggie dung and make the poo disappear into thin air . for a moment i be hop that vapoorize be a real product so that i could spray it on this stinker of a movie and make it disappear into thin air as well . although envy be not the bad movie that i have see in the past 12 month ( that honor go to the cat in the hat ) and it do get the honor of a close second . not funny and not sad and not anything . a real stinkeroo . a 0. negative . | 0neg |
greeting again from the darkness . what ever happen to the great barry levinson . he direct two of my all time favorites in avalon and diner . he have some fine movie a well ( rainman ) and but always provide something of interest . until now . i believe the bad thing you can ever say about a comedy be that it be bore . envy be the definition of boring . never of big fan of pure slap stick ( dumb and dumber ) and i be just stun at how god awful this movie be . there be maybe 2 chuckle in the whole thing if you can pay attention that long . the best part of the film be the run gag of the title song by a redbone sound alike . if the film have be write as well a the song and it would have be tolerable . rachel weisz be a wonderful actress and i realize they all want to do comedy ( even julianne moore ) and but the real world expose one weakness . snl cast member amy poehler be her usual over the top in her role a trailer park trash turn princess . the disaster of the film be jack black and ben stiller . the first work commute together flash some promise and but after that their chemistry disappears due to the poor script . this script be like most of jack black character idea not a bad thought and but no hope for success . | 0neg |
work with one of the best shakespeare source and this film manage to be creditable to it source and whilst still appeal to a wider audience . branagh steal the film from under fishburne nose and and there a talented cast on good form . | 0neg |
such be the dilemma ( above ) that debbie must face at the close of this sam sherman production naughty stewardess . debbie have just hit town and become a stewardess and slept with an elderly rich man ( who she describe be in his 50 but obviously hit that mark a decade or two ago ) and shoots nude scene for a photographer she just meet and and then be the central element to a kidnapping or extortion plot . through it all and amidst all that emotional upheaval and soul searching and what in heaven name will debbie do . well and i can not give it away completely but do not expect any real epiphany here . let face it . naughty stewardess be just what it want to be ( at least two third through ) represent a soft core porn film with lot of topless woman and a funny in that kitchy 70 way film . there be no grand art here . the movie be design to make money and exploit a grow trend at the time to put nymphomaniacal stewardess in film so that the audience could live out vicariously their voyeuristic taste . by todays standard and the film be pretty tame . what this film do do wrong be try to be some kind of statement film at the end . c amon and anyone here believe that little diatribe by debbie while on the beach contemplate life . she would spend more time pick out which halter top she will wear that day then do that . and what about the ridiculous plot to steal 50 grand . it do not make sense to me so how on earth do these character dig it . anyone buy cal a a member of the plo ( something like that ) or even a a director for hardcore pornography . he would be luck to get work at seven eleven . this be and a another reviewer note and more of a sam sherman piece then and al adamson piece . you can tell when al be in complete charge . there be virtually no budget and the film doesn not look nearly as polished a this . adamson do a decent job direct this time and i have to give sherman credit to a degree . while this film be bad just for what it be mean to be and it have a certain style to it . i like the opening credit with the animation and photograph . i even like the music of sparrow . silver heel be a somewhat catchy tune . the movie doesn not look cheap really at all . compare that to any of al horror film . a for the cast and yes and bob livingston be a bit old for the lead and but some examination go into his character and the obvious thread that young woman be attract to men with money be explore as well . i have major problem with robert smedley who be just plain awful in his role . the girl have all get great set and so what else be require of them huh . naughty stewardess be relatively harmless exploitation film from the 70 and will serve a a living time capsule for certain aspect of life during that decade . by the way and do i mention it be a pretty bad picture . | 0neg |
i seek out this film for one reason al adamson . he be among the bad director of all time right up there with ed wood and jr. and ray dennis steckler and the pantheon of awfulness . however and i be a tad disappointed because although the film be indeed bad and it never approach the level of awfulness of some of his early schlocky movie . because of that and this film wasn not particularly fun to watch for u bad movie fan . now i be wary about watch this film and a the title naughty stewardess make the film sound like a pornographic film something i wouldn not be review on imdb . however and this film appear to be this at time particularly the first 10 minute . but and you could tell that the script underwent many change and a for much of the film there isn not any titillation at all and towards the end of the movie there be a plot that come out of no where that be violent and certainly not sexy . the result of all this be total confusion . sadly and none of the many part be even good . for example and a a porn video and it show surprisingly little and it incomprehensible why they would put a 71 year old guy in some of the love scene . sure and for a 71 year old mr. livingston look pretty good but he be still an old man and no one would want to see him get it on with young nymphet . then and when the final 20 minute becomes very violent and a livingston become a rambo like guy . talk about weird and inappropriate . overall and there be little to recommend this sad movie . it not bad enough or sexy enough to care about and the film manage to be rather bore even with such a crazy title like naughty stewardess . | 0neg |
connie hoffman be very pretty and be attractively topless at time . that it and folk . the sole reason for even consider whether to watch this film or not . these 70 sexploitation period piece be sometimes entertaining by virtue of their very datedness ( flared trouser and big hair and zapata moustache etc . ) . this one isn not . the script be bad and the acting be bad and the direction be bad and and the idea of have a senior citizen romantic lead man be exceptionally bad . the title and hinting at a sex comedy and be grossly misleading . i heartily recommend avoid this one like the plague . | 0neg |
from the start and you know this be a sam sherman film more than an al adamson film because a the credit roll and a sam sherman production appear in letter as big a the title credit . not only that and mr. sherman co write the screenplay and it be his idea to use bob livingstone and a wash up and 69 year old western star of the old hollywood era to be his male lead in a picture that sherman think would capitalize on the recent success of swing stewardess . now why would you want to have a wrinkled old man a your male lead in what be suppose to be a soft core exploitation feature . it defy explanation and but that be sam sherman for you . his obsession with old hollywood color a lot of his film for independent international picture and and he and al adamson frequently try to get have be actor for their film ( e. g. j. carrol naish and russ tamblyn and lon chaney jr. and etc . ) . but bob livingstone . tell me the drive in demographic knew who this 40 second rater be while it ridiculous . but then again and naughty stewardess be a successful picture for them and so we can not just write this off a a sherman fiasco . still and by any aesthetic standard and it an incoherent mess . al adamson want out of this picture and and it be easy to see why . first off and it have no genre focus at all and drift around from super soft core ( tit and as or simulate sex only ) to a kidnapping thriller ( shade of steckler rat pfink and boo boo . ) in between and we get subject to painfully boring sequence of the stewardess traipse around vega to the hackneyed music of sparrow and or richard smedley and connie hoffmann on a photo shoot in san francisco . bad of all and we get bob livingstone a a jack lalanne wannabe in a blue jumpsuit try to be sexy . gag . ( thankfully and his big sex scene with connie hoffmann be delete and but you can catch him slurp on her titty on the dvd in the special feature section . creepy . ) this be a terrible and terrible movie and but i will give it three star for gary graver photography and out of sympathy to connie hoffmann for have to make it with wrinkle livingstone . naughty stewardess be for al adamson completists and or or scholar of exploitation film a sam sherman commentary offer vital inside info . all others and beware . | 0neg |
this movie be truly brilliant . it duck through banality to crap at such speed you do not even see good sense and common decency to mankind go whiz past . but it doesn not stop there . this movie hit the bottom of the barrel so hard it bounce back to the point of ludicrous comedy represent behold a kor the beergutted conan wannabe with the over abundance of neck hair strut his stuff swing his sword like there no tomorrow ( and the way he swing it and i really be amaze there be a tomorrow for him and or at least and for his beer gut ) . don not miss this movie and it a fantastic romp through idiocy and and sheer bloody mindedness . and once you have finish watch this one and dry the tear of joy ( or tear of frustration at such an inept attempt at storytelling ) from your eye because some stupid f00l give these people another $ 5 to make a sequel . | 0neg |
what we have here be a downright brilliant piece of early 80 incompetence that will render even the big connoisseur of trash cinema completely speechless . wizard of the lost kingdom be a very cheap and cheesy fantasy or sword and sorcery adventure that doesn not have an actual plot but do eagerly and shamelessly borrow element from other film . writer ed naha and hector olivera ( who . ) watch enough similar type of movie to know that they need a handful of essential character and but probably figure that all the rest would follow automatically . in order to make a fantasy adventure you need represent one super evil villain ( preferably with a black cape ) and one young hero in training and one lone warrior and one amiable type of furry pet and one wise midget living in the wood ( optional ) and a whole colorful collection of hideous demon and enslave dwarf and and wing gargoyle to serve a filler . the story be phenomenal and so original and with simon the young son of a wizard have to flee from his beloved kingdom after the evil magician shurka take over the power and kill the king . simon want to go back and save the people and but therefore he need his powerful ring which he lose during his escape . simon befriend lone warrior kor ( the usually cool dude bo svenson who clearly need the pay check ) and who assist simon during the long and devastate journey full of ordeal and dangerous encounter and magical showdown . admittedly it doesn not even sound too bad thus far and but that merely just because i exclude all the deliciously inept little detail . simon have a best friend name gulfax and for example . gulfax be an albino version of chewbacca and evokes incontrollable chuckle whenever he open his poodle snout to yelp something incomprehensible . the obstacle during journey back home be hilariously irrelevant to the plot and simply serve a pad footage to cover up the lack of actual content . simon have nightmarish vision inside the tent of a suspicious forest nymph and kor settle an old score with the pig face nemesis whose sister he refuse to marry and there the supposedly horrible uicide cave where you can only sing your way out of . but the absolute most unequally brilliant sequence not just of this film alone but in the history of cinema involve the resurrection of four zombie warrior . simon awake the legendary courageous warrior and hop they will assist them in their battle and but the rotting corpses only take a few step and complain about how tired they be and return back to their graf . that it . so much for the zombie sub plot . best sequence ever . i could go on list unintentionally hilarious little detail for several more paragraph and but you get the idea . wizard of the lost kingdom be a tremendously mess up so bad it good film . word of advice represent do not watch this joyful piece of junk alone . invite friend and preferably the dope head type with a wicked sense of humor and and watch it in group . it will be a night to remember . | 0neg |
all these reviewer be spot on . i have see many bad film over the year and believe me and and this beat the lot . this be not just a so bad it good exploiter waste of time and but a genuine and hilarious and movie atrocity . check out the white furry monster type thing . wet yourself laugh at thom christopher spell weave act . gape in sheer ae clench disbelief . at the threadbare set . this be one of those european co production . no wonder we have so many war . i swear and some of the people take part in wizard of the lost kingdom aren not actually aware they be appear in a film . fact . i originally watch this movie on htv wale late one night while suffer from concussion and sleep deprivation . i have to track down a copy several week later to make sure it be really this awful . it be . bad even than lee major in the norseman and more laughable than all of john derek film and this be and truly and the citizen kane of trash . | 0neg |
if somebody want to make a really and really bad movie and wizard of the lost kingdom really set a yardstick by which to measure the depth of badness . start with the pseudo chewbacca that follow around the main character . some poor schmuck in a baggy white furry costume that look a if it be stitch together from discard piece of carpeting . work your way slowly and painfully and through more not so special effect that thoroughly deny the viewer from suspension of disbelief . add a garden gnome ( just for the heck of it ) . on second thought and skip this movie entirely and find something else to do for an hour and a half . | 0neg |
go immediately and rent this movie . it will be be on a bottom shelf in your local video store and will be cover in dust . no one will have touch it in year . it may even be a $ . 50 special . it worth ten buck and i swear . buy it . there aren not very many film than can compare with this the celluloid version of that goo that form at the bottom of a trash can after a few year . yes and i give it a 1 and but it really deserve much low . 1 10 scale be not design with stuff like this in mind . | 0neg |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.