Split (1)

train · 13.8M rows

sentence stringlengths 1 23.5k ⌀
completed in Assurance Limited assurance has been provided in accordance with ISAE 3000 and ISAE 3410 on the energy usage and greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions data.
We aim to help shape a more sustainable and equitable future for all.
Re-statements • Following our first CSR Report publication, regular review of the data was carried out to ensure accuracy and consistency.
This has led to a few changes in the data from our first report.
The data quoted in this CSR Report reflect the revised data.
All data points that have been adjusted are called out with ‘†’.
• We have updated our GHG emission boundary definition.
Our new boundary definition for Scope includes sites that are greater than 30,000 square feet or contain manufacturing, distribution, or significant R&D activities.
• We have updated our baseline year for GHG inventory from identifying that 2019 is the earliest accurate, reliable and representative data set for our portfolio.
Our science-based targets of remain in effect and will now be tracked against 2019 data.
We are committed to transparency and continuous improvement.
This section contains key performance indicators for select economic, social, environmental, and governance metrics.
† All data points that have been adjusted.
or contain manufacturing, distribution, or significant R&D activities.
• Within the boundary, data reported for energy and emission comes from direct utility sources.
Where direct data was unavailable, (shared tenant spaces, etc.), industry standards (CBECS) were applied as estimates to capture total impact.
is the earliest reliable and representative data set for our portfolio.
• Energy emission factor for fuel based on 2018 Climate Registry Default Emission Factors.
Notes: 1 Water intensity based on total water consumption at main sites normalized by square feet of rentable space at main site locations.
Water data includes main site locations (San Diego HQ, i UK Cambridge Illumina Centre, and Singapore Woodlands).
• For all people metrics unless specified, the values include only regular Illumina employees, not contingent workers.
We do not track personal information for contingent workers.
• For all gender statistics, percentage of women is based on number of employees that identify as male or female, not total number of Illumina employees.
† Age of employee data corrected from 2018 and 2019.
In our previous report, data was pulled using age of employee as of the date the report was run as opposed to snapshot of employee age at end of each fiscal year.
As such, the numbers for headcount and turnover by age bracket are adjusted compared to last year’s submission.
† Data correction from previous year due to calculation approach error for minority population, The field being used to count “Minority” groups was correctly excluding those that chose “Decline to State”, but not excluding those with a value of “Blank”, which got mistakenly bundled into a group called “Other” that was ...
% Choose not to self disclose Notes: 1 % data for new hire by age represents the percentage of the total age group headcount for the reporting year.
Notes: 1 Previous report listed Manager instead of Supervisor as label of the grouping.
2 iPulse participation rates in 2018 and 2019 are calculated using an average of two surveys per year (Q2 and Q4 of each year).
For an average of three quarterly surveys (Q2–Q4).
• For all training hour metrics, the values include only regular Illumina employees, not contingent workers.
Contingent workers: workers who are not employees but whose work and/or workplace is controlled by the organization.
• Lost time incident rate calculated using total hours worked from employees + contingent workers.
Main outcomes of completed legal actions, including any decisions or judgments: The International Equipment Trading, Ltd. (IET) civil action noted in our Illumina expressly denying any liability or wrongdoing.
2 No change to the number of women on the Board.
There were 3 out of 9 in 2019 and 3 out of 10 in 2020.
All data points that have been adjusted are called out with †. Governance Non-compliance with environmental laws and regulations Significant fines and non-monetary sanctions for non-compliance with environmental laws and/or regulations 0 0 # of FDA recalls/total units recalled 0 0 Number of substantiated complaints con...
In 2020, there were four requests for arbitration filed, each of which Illumina has challenged.
Fees Illumina participates in various trade associations and industry memberships for collaboration and exchange of ideas.
AdvaMed $San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce $15,300 US-China Business Council $15,000 US-UAE Business Council $10,775 MIPI Alliance $8,240 Industrial Environmental Association (IEA) $6,000 Healthcare Businesswomen's Association (HBA) $5,000 International memberships of potential equivalent scope to trade associatio...
Illumina is reporting to the SASB Standards for the first time in 2021 based on our 2020 reporting data.
Illumina is classified officially in the Health Care Sector and Medical Equipment & Supply Industry.
In addition to the recommended disclosure topics for our assigned industry, we have identified supplemental sections that we feel closely align with our business.
Therefore, we have chosen to add relevant sections from the industry category of Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals Industry as well as the Software & IT Services Industry to capture employee engagement and diversity topics.
We are committed to supporting improvements on the effectiveness and comparability of corporate disclosure on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors.
Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) Index Illumina is committed to providing transparency on our climate change risk management.
TCFD has created voluntary climate-related disclosures for use by companies to provide information to stakeholders.
We have used the TCFD recommendations to guide our reporting.
Focus on Illumina, TCFD Details Management role Describe management role in assessing and managing risks and opportunities.
Focus on Illumina, TCFD Details Strategy: Disclose the actual and potential impacts of climate-related risks and opportunities on the organization’s businesses, strategy, and financial planning where such information is material.
Strategy Climate risk and opportunities timeline Describe the climate-related risks and opportunities the organization has identified over the short, medium, and long term.
Process to manage climate risk Describe the organization’s processes for managing climate-related risks.
Process to integrate climate risk in overall risk management Describe how processes for identifying, assessing, and managing climate-related risks are integrated into the organization’s overall risk management.
At Illumina, we believe addressing climate change is one of the key topics to achieving a sustainable, just, and resilient future for all.
We are committed to transparency and as our program evolves, we will continue to share progress in our annual CSR Report and CDP submissions.
Governance The Board of Directors (Board) provides oversight to the CSR program covering environmental, social, and governance (ESG) topics, including climate-related issues.
The Board receives updates at least annually on current performance and future strategic plans, with additional updates provided if material changes occur.
The Illumina CEO is responsible for directing all aspects of company strategy, planning, and operations.
Climate-related issues and projects associated with the reduction of our environmental footprint are escalated to the Board through the Illumina CEO and their direct reports.
On at least an annual basis, updates on CSR, including climate-related topics, are provided to the Board of Directors.
The Chief Financial Officer (CFO) chairs the Executive CSR Steering Committee, which comprises a team of senior leaders drawn from across the organization, including the Chief People Officer, Chief Medical Officer, Chief Marketing Officer, General Counsel, Chief Product Officer, and SVP Operations.
The CSR Executive Committee has overall responsibility for reviewing company activities related to CSR, including climate change.
The CSR functional group reports directly to the Chief Financial Officer (CFO), with responsibility for program recommendations, management, reporting, and oversight on efforts to incorporate sustainability into our business practices.
As we grow our CSR programming and the external sustainability landscape evolves, we will re-assess the frequency of regular updates to the Board and the potential assignment of responsibility to a Board sub-committee.
Strategy Environmental sustainability was identified as one of our CSR core focus areas following our first materiality assessment and stakeholder engagement exercises.
With the publication of our first CSR Report in April 2020, we announced our approach, focus, and targets.
We established targets in support of the science-based methodology to align with the Paris Agreement and a scenario of well below 2°C.
Our first sustainability targets are centered around our facilities, our supply chain, and our products.
We recognize that climate-related risks and opportunities span both physical risk (extreme weather) and transition risks (energy pricing, customer expectations, regulations, and technology).
The following types of risk were identified in line with TCFD terminology: technology; market; reputation; acute physical; and chronic physical.
Impact could be the result of business interruption due to climate-related risk or business operational impact.
Impact is assessed for financial, operational, and reputational risk.
Likelihood: Not likely, As likely as not, More likely than not, Likely, Virtually certain Impact: Low (ability to absorb financial, operational, reputational impact), Moderate (some impact to finances, operations, reputation), High (substantive financial, operational, strategic, reputational impact.
The climate change elements that have most influenced our strategy are physical risk to operations, supply chain impact, and reputation.
These risks have been incorporated into business continuity planning, future product development, redundancy in supply chain where possible, and site selection for future growth.
We are actively reviewing opportunities to further integrate climate into our processes and path to further expand resilience.
Examples of incorporation include: targets to align with the UN Sustainable Development Goals and utilize the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) methodology for a well below throughout the life cycle; incorporation of Design for Environment into our new product design; and addition of a new logistics location to o...
We have implemented redundant planning and maintained safety stock to provide resilience during severe weather events.
For financial planning, we include risk and opportunities evaluated through our standard budget planning.
Investment in energy-reduction projects that require capital expenditures are evaluated through the Capital Committee planning process.
Potential indirect cost associated with supply chain, future tax, or increased operating costs from extreme weather would connect with these internal workstreams.
Climate Scenario Analysis In climate scenarios linked to global warming by 2100.
Our goal was to better understand the implications of climate change for our business and identify opportunities to build resilience.
Climate scenario analysis was completed using three plausible narrative future representations of our operating environment respectively aligned to a well below warming.
Climate Trajectory SSP Scenarios RCP Variables Assessed carbon price; physical impacts including temperature change, drought likelihood, heat wave probability, and maximum rainfall.
Well below Under the 4°C scenario, global warming reaches 4°C by 2100, relative to pre-industrial temperatures.
In or knowledge, and a challenging economic situation, worsened by disinformation and general mistrust.
Limited action on climate policy will be taken and a doubling down on fossil-based energy sources will result.
More frequent climate-related weather events impact most regions by 2030.
This scenario utilizes data from RCP and adaptation).
Accelerating automation with uneven benefits leads to a focus on inequality.
Society is slow to react to climate impacts, distracted by larger economic concerns.
Carbon emissions have started to decline slightly: energy efficiency and renewable gains are easily offset by increased use of energy-intensive tech.
This scenario causes some physical climate impacts by 2030.
This model utilizes data from RCP mitigation, high challenges to adaptation).
Under the well below economic recovery that fully embraces the low-carbon transition, with strong climate policy and regulatory action.
Some severe climate impacts felt spur coordinated risk-containment efforts.
While some physical impacts are already locked in, the pace of change slows and by world is on a well below 2°C trajectory.
This model utilizes data from RCP challenges to mitigation/adaptation).

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.