issue_owner_repo listlengths 2 2 | issue_body stringlengths 0 261k ⌀ | issue_title stringlengths 1 925 | issue_comments_url stringlengths 56 81 | issue_comments_count int64 0 2.5k | issue_created_at stringlengths 20 20 | issue_updated_at stringlengths 20 20 | issue_html_url stringlengths 37 62 | issue_github_id int64 387k 2.91B | issue_number int64 1 131k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
Race conditio... | Racy usage of sync.Cond in client-go/tools may cause goroutine leaks | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90581/comments | 5 | 2020-04-29T03:48:28Z | 2020-05-20T06:40:33Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90581 | 608,757,589 | 90,581 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
i have a daemonset yaml, there is not updateStrategy in yaml. But create daemonset by kubectl, updateStrategy is set `type: OnDelete`.
in `https://v1-14.docs.kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/manage-daemon/update-daemon-set/`，the daemonset default strategy is RollingUpdate。
the source daemonset yam... | Create daemonset by kubectl or helm，but default updateStrategy is OnDelete | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90580/comments | 3 | 2020-04-29T03:46:27Z | 2020-04-29T06:19:23Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90580 | 608,757,057 | 90,580 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | - [Ticket status](#sec-1)
- [Current problem](#sec-2)
- [Proposed solution](#sec-3)
# Ticket status<a id="sec-1"></a>
- [ ] [K8s watch events test tooling #323](https://github.com/cncf/apisnoop/pull/323)
- [ ] [Watch event test verification tooling #90574](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/... | Watch event test verification tooling | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90574/comments | 8 | 2020-04-28T23:50:29Z | 2020-05-10T21:50:04Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90574 | 608,685,830 | 90,574 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
when initializing a kubernetes cluster in Google Cloud manually (not using GKE), internal (and external if available/applicable) node IP is not populated in "kubectl get nodes" if the interface used to connect to the master and passed to kubelet does not correspond to the first network interface, ... | GCE "baremetal" cluster, worker node IPs not populated when kubelet --node-ip given IP of not-first-NIC | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90570/comments | 4 | 2020-04-28T21:57:09Z | 2020-06-29T05:18:15Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90570 | 608,641,804 | 90,570 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **Which jobs are failing**:
Overall
**Which test(s) are failing**:
ci-kubernetes-build-fast
**Since when has it been failing**:
04-28 12:59 PDT
**Testgrid link**:
https://testgrid.k8s.io/sig-release-master-blocking#build-master-fast
**Reason for failure**:
W0428 20:30:04.496] File "/workspace/./test-... | [Failing Test] build-master-fast (ci-kubernetes-build-fast) | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90568/comments | 15 | 2020-04-28T20:46:30Z | 2020-04-29T04:25:52Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90568 | 608,604,802 | 90,568 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
First,you can create job like below yaml file
```
apiVersion: batch/v1
kind: Job
metadata:
name: job-test-deadline
namespace: default
spec:
completions: 1
parallelism: 1
activeDeadlineSeconds: 40
template:
metadata:
creationTimestamp: null
... | activeDeadlineSeconds is setted greater than original ,the value is invalid. | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90553/comments | 12 | 2020-04-28T11:57:07Z | 2021-01-02T13:53:52Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90553 | 608,259,283 | 90,553 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
First,you can create job like below yaml file
```
apiVersion: batch/v1
kind: Job
metadata:
name: job-test-deadline
namespace: default
spec:
completions: 1
parallelism: 1
activeDeadlineSeconds: 40
template:
metadata:
creationTimestamp: null
... | activeDeadlineSeconds is invalid, job has completed, info is not accurate about status | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90551/comments | 4 | 2020-04-28T11:50:29Z | 2020-06-03T19:54:11Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90551 | 608,255,534 | 90,551 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
First,you can create job like below yaml file.
```
apiVersion: batch/v1
kind: Job
metadata:
name: job-test-deadline
namespace: default
spec:
completions: 1
parallelism: 1
activeDeadlineSeconds: 40
template:
metadata:
creationTimestamp: null
... | activeDeadlineSeconds is not reached, the original job is regenerated, then activeDeadlineSeconds is invalid | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90550/comments | 8 | 2020-04-28T11:46:09Z | 2020-06-03T20:03:06Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90550 | 608,253,245 | 90,550 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | Is it possible to have a logical OR operation for different keys when selecting objects? Something like
```key1=value1 || key2=value2```
I am more interested in the programmatic approach via the go-client case not the YAML config. | ORing label selectors for different keys | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90549/comments | 8 | 2020-04-28T11:24:24Z | 2022-08-19T07:48:49Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90549 | 608,240,474 | 90,549 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | This PR: https://github.com/jetstack/cert-manager/pull/2831 properly enabled the validating webhook during e2e tests.
Its merge corresponds with all our periodic e2e jobs on Kubernetes 1.14 and below failing due to:
```
Unexpected error:
<*errors.StatusError | 0xc0000c2640>: {
ErrStatus... | e2e tests failing on Kubernetes 1.14 and below | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90547/comments | 3 | 2020-04-28T10:21:42Z | 2020-04-28T10:22:05Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90547 | 608,200,848 | 90,547 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
when I edit t... | How can I make Level of klog of kube-proxy to 4? | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90546/comments | 10 | 2020-04-28T10:06:35Z | 2020-04-28T19:13:26Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90546 | 608,190,829 | 90,546 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
A field in a structure is sometimes protected by Mutex, but sometimes unprotected.
This may lead to data race.
There are 7 such cases:
- [ ] `pm.plugins` is not protected by `pm.mutex` on L754. But for all the other 6 places, it is protected by `pm.mutex`.
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernete... | A field in a structure is sometimes protected by Mutex, but sometimes unprotected. | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90540/comments | 10 | 2020-04-28T04:18:08Z | 2020-10-12T00:26:44Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90540 | 608,012,294 | 90,540 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please only use this template for submitting reports about continuously failing tests or jobs in Kubernetes CI -->
**Which jobs are failing**:
`verify-master (ci-kubernetes-verify-master)`
**Which test(s) are failing**:
`Overall`
**Since when has it been failing**:
`04-27-20 05:47 PDT`
**Testg... | [Failing Test] verify-master (ci-kubernetes-verify-master) | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90538/comments | 7 | 2020-04-28T01:02:59Z | 2020-04-28T13:19:04Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90538 | 607,949,045 | 90,538 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please only use this template for submitting enhancement requests -->
**What would you like to be added**:
The API Server's secure serving settings today [only requests the client cert](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/staging/src/k8s.io/apiserver/pkg/server/secure_serving.go#L64), and its ... | API Server package does per-request cert verification | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90533/comments | 24 | 2020-04-27T19:44:06Z | 2021-04-08T02:57:15Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90533 | 607,805,188 | 90,533 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**: When we enabled service topology on our Kubernetes cluster, it didn't seem to work. When we put topology keys on a service:
- If a wildcard key was included, traffic was routed as though that was the only key.
- If no wildcard key was included, traffic wasn't routed anywhere at all.
We made a lo... | Service Topology: kube-proxy seems to be unaware of node labels in 1.17.4 | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90521/comments | 16 | 2020-04-27T14:16:46Z | 2020-04-28T14:14:40Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90521 | 607,587,725 | 90,521 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What would you like to be added**:
The ability to modify the labels and selector clauses in StatefulSets after they are deployed
**Why is this needed**:
Currently if a STS is deployed and you need to modify the pod labels and, by inference, the selector labels you cannot do so, because Kubernetes will reject the... | Allow editing labels/selector in pod template spec in StatefulSets | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90519/comments | 22 | 2020-04-27T12:29:18Z | 2025-01-06T18:52:10Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90519 | 607,509,076 | 90,519 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What would you like to be added**:
Sorry if this has been asked before, is it possible to change the CPU requests and limits during the course of the lifetime of a pod ?
**Why is this needed**:
Java applications typically need more CPU during initialization and subsequently settle down. Putting the pod into the ... | Dynamically changing CPU requests / limits | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90518/comments | 3 | 2020-04-27T11:41:02Z | 2021-03-02T14:02:29Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90518 | 607,477,737 | 90,518 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | [Recent failure](https://prow.k8s.io/view/gcs/kubernetes-jenkins/logs/ci-kubernetes-e2e-gce-scale-correctness/1254380216860545027) in sig-scalability conformance test is related to CustomResourcePublishOpenAPI. Could you please check the reason for this failure?
/sig api-machinery
/assign @liggitt
/cc @kubernetes... | E2E: [sig-api-machinery] CustomResourcePublishOpenAPI [Privileged:ClusterAdmin] works for CRD with validation schema [Conformance] | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90517/comments | 3 | 2020-04-27T10:42:59Z | 2020-04-27T12:46:10Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90517 | 607,439,781 | 90,517 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What would you like to be added**:
Support reflector with tuned backoff manager for informer factory.
**Why is this needed**:
We have clusters with more than 60k pods, configmaps, and crds in production. Several operators are watching api resources, which list all resources of one kind on start. We have encounte... | Support reflector with tuned backoff manager for informer factory | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90514/comments | 7 | 2020-04-27T09:03:48Z | 2020-09-29T01:22:52Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90514 | 607,369,121 | 90,514 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
Observed on m... | Multiple service delete with Foreground propagation policy results in hanging services | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90512/comments | 17 | 2020-04-27T06:42:10Z | 2020-10-20T14:35:52Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90512 | 607,281,111 | 90,512 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**: On both k8s 1.16.1 and 1.18.2 Ubuntu 18.04 aarch64 and Rasbpian Buster ARM7l kubelet logs say cannot detect CPU cache and I see this:
`Apr 26 13:55:24 pi0 kubelet[1509]: E0426 13:55:24.900279 1509 machine.go:331] failed to get cache information for node 0: open /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cache: ... | Kubelet cannot detect CPU Cache for ARM CPUs | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90511/comments | 10 | 2020-04-27T06:28:45Z | 2021-01-18T02:45:18Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90511 | 607,273,972 | 90,511 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
```
root@mas... | csr approved than denied ，can not be approved again | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90510/comments | 3 | 2020-04-27T06:20:54Z | 2020-06-02T06:34:16Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90510 | 607,270,180 | 90,510 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **Which jobs are failing**:
gce-master-scale-correctness (ci-kubernetes-e2e-gce-scale-correctness)
**Which test(s) are failing**:
[sig-api-machinery] CustomResourcePublishOpenAPI [Privileged:ClusterAdmin] works for CRD with validation schema [Conformance]
**Since when has it been failing**:
04-26 05:02 PDT
... | [Flaky Test]: gce-master-scale-correctness (ci-kubernetes-e2e-gce-scale-correctness) | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90506/comments | 10 | 2020-04-26T14:47:34Z | 2020-05-01T07:40:19Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90506 | 607,030,049 | 90,506 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
I am running ... | Unable to request "attachable-volumes-aws-ebs" resource | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90505/comments | 4 | 2020-04-26T13:34:36Z | 2022-04-05T15:06:54Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90505 | 607,013,981 | 90,505 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | /kind bug
/sig api-machinery
/cc @sttts @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-misc
in [OAS's supported data models](https://swagger.io/docs/specification/data-models/dictionaries/), we can represent map structure using `additionalProperties`. and it says there's two official ways plus one CRD's extended way to represent ... | Free-form object directive as Map's value type in CRD openapi schema doesn't work | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90504/comments | 9 | 2020-04-26T12:07:26Z | 2020-06-23T07:49:24Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90504 | 606,996,673 | 90,504 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
the infra_ima... | imagePullSecrets cannot work for the private infra_image | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90503/comments | 16 | 2020-04-26T10:23:49Z | 2023-02-23T17:01:29Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90503 | 606,976,615 | 90,503 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
Cert path was generated with wrong sl... | use filepath to concatenate cert paths | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90492/comments | 1 | 2020-04-25T22:47:45Z | 2020-04-26T03:05:30Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90492 | 606,871,246 | 90,492 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | Unable to deploy AI model to Kubernetes | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90488/comments | 2 | 2020-04-25T17:55:39Z | 2020-04-26T01:00:51Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90488 | 606,822,120 | 90,488 | |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
While running a simple loop test on DaemonSet to evaluate certain flaky behavior, I noticed that the pods for DaemonSets don't always get scheduled due to `Operation cannot be fulfilled on daemonsets.apps "daemonset-example": the object has been modified; please apply your changes to the latest vers... | DaemonSet Controller - Flaky race-condition on Version Check during UpdateStrategy | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90485/comments | 21 | 2020-04-25T10:25:50Z | 2021-11-12T15:21:22Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90485 | 606,739,603 | 90,485 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | I am working on creating a zip of multiple files on the server and stream it to the client while creating. Initially, I was using [https://www.archiverjs.com/](url) It was working fine if I was appending buffer to it but it fails when I need to add streams into it. Then after having some discussion here [https://github... | unexpected behavior using zip-stream NPM on GKE | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90483/comments | 9 | 2020-04-25T08:46:36Z | 2020-11-09T17:13:54Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90483 | 606,722,433 | 90,483 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
Ran `kubectl get events -o yaml`
got list of events but some of the timestamp fields are missing
for example here - no first and last:
```
- action: Binding
apiVersion: v1
eventTime: "2020-04-24T13:38:26.252501Z"
firstTimestamp: null
involvedObject:
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod... | kubectl get events returns null on some events timestamp fields | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90482/comments | 7 | 2020-04-25T08:23:07Z | 2020-04-25T21:02:16Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90482 | 606,718,848 | 90,482 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | Looking at a released go.mod file:
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/v1.18.2/go.mod#L141-L152
Please see the for all the staging repos, we have `v0.0.0` in the root go.mod. If there was a way for the release tooling to update this go.mod file just before we cut alpha/beta/rc/final etc. that would help s... | Fix entries in root go.mod for staging repositories just before tagging a release | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90474/comments | 7 | 2020-04-24T21:05:27Z | 2020-07-30T10:23:23Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90474 | 606,583,477 | 90,474 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | per https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/blob/master/keps/sig-architecture/1635-prevent-permabeta/README.md. https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/90472 added the tags, but the release note should be in 1.22. | batch v1beta1 will be deprecated in 1.22 | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90473/comments | 5 | 2020-04-24T20:40:20Z | 2021-06-02T02:51:13Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90473 | 606,570,939 | 90,473 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
Variables are... | Environment Variable Interpolation is Order Dependent | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90466/comments | 3 | 2020-04-24T18:54:27Z | 2020-06-11T12:30:57Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90466 | 606,516,443 | 90,466 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What would you like to be added**:
Expose the threshold of each eviction signal, and optionally their current value.
**Why is this needed**:
Since an eviction might cause disruption to the overall quality of service, we'd like to be able to prevent it from happening. Right now, we can collect most of the require... | Expose eviction-related metrics in kubelet | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90464/comments | 8 | 2020-04-24T17:47:54Z | 2020-09-25T17:04:12Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90464 | 606,481,476 | 90,464 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
API server couldn't use webhook to authenticate requests using barrier token
```
E0424 17:01:08.212332 1 webhook.go:196] Failed to make webhook authorizer request: the server could not find the requested resource
E0424 17:01:08.212430 1 errors.go:77] the server could not find the requ... | Kubernetes API Server authentication and authorization webhook failed due to the server could not find the requested resource | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90462/comments | 8 | 2020-04-24T17:19:46Z | 2022-01-25T14:05:06Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90462 | 606,466,314 | 90,462 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
I have been experiencing some strange behaviour on the HPA v2 on v1.14.9, where it scales up a deployment unnecessarily during rolling updates. The deployment has a `maxSurge` of 1 and a `maxUnavailable` of 0, and while the deployment is completely idle at 1 replica, a rolling update makes it scale ... | HPA v2 scales up deployment during rolling updates | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90461/comments | 8 | 2020-04-24T17:00:50Z | 2022-06-10T21:17:04Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90461 | 606,455,761 | 90,461 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
I had some ve... | DNS name with pod name prefix shouldn't resolve to an IP when Service does load balancing | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90453/comments | 5 | 2020-04-24T12:32:47Z | 2020-04-25T10:17:27Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90453 | 606,279,319 | 90,453 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please only use this template for submitting reports about continuously failing tests or jobs in Kubernetes CI -->
**Which jobs are failing**:
`gce-cos-master-slow (ci-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce-slow)`
**Which test(s) are failing**:
`[sig-network] Loadbalancing: L7 [Slow] Nginx should conform to Ingress sp... | [Failing Test] gce-cos-master-slow (ci-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce-slow) | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90451/comments | 9 | 2020-04-24T12:22:05Z | 2020-04-24T22:32:38Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90451 | 606,273,355 | 90,451 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
E2E:networking_perf.go test failing
My cluster is based on 1.16.3 release with multus CNI, when I ran networking_perf suite from e2e.test, it is failing out with below error.
Apr 17 07:46:25.532: INFO: At 2020-04-17 07:36:40 +0000 UTC - event for iperf-e2e-pod-0: {kubelet worker-pool1-09u5e8jl-e... | E2E: networking_perf.go test erroring out | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90450/comments | 3 | 2020-04-24T11:48:09Z | 2020-05-04T15:10:28Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90450 | 606,254,649 | 90,450 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | 
how to solve this? | telnet nameserver 不通 | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90446/comments | 6 | 2020-04-24T10:32:52Z | 2020-05-14T22:25:44Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90446 | 606,213,681 | 90,446 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please only use this template for submitting reports about continuously failing tests or jobs in Kubernetes CI -->
**Which jobs are failing**:
`gci-gce-ingress (ci-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce-ingress)`
**Which test(s) are failing**:
```
[sig-network] Loadbalancing: L7 GCE [Slow] [Feature:Ingress] multiclus... | [Failing Test] gci-gce-ingress (ci-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce-ingress) | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90445/comments | 4 | 2020-04-24T10:29:04Z | 2020-04-25T12:09:37Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90445 | 606,211,432 | 90,445 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please only use this template for submitting enhancement requests -->
**What would you like to be added**:
I'd like a new type of Service, an external SRV record service which would be configured similarly to an external name service, by setting an external DNS record. However, contrary to an external name s... | New type of Service: external SRV record | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90444/comments | 16 | 2020-04-24T09:56:12Z | 2022-12-21T23:07:34Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90444 | 606,191,519 | 90,444 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
We want to increase the default maxPods value from `110` to `200` for Kubernetes node.
We followed this documentation to update node configuration dynamically:
https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/reconfigure-kubelet/
We had generated the configuration file as per doc in namespac... | patching node for allocatable pods not updated | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90441/comments | 7 | 2020-04-24T09:12:24Z | 2020-12-20T12:34:11Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90441 | 606,164,598 | 90,441 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
I am trying to patch a namespace but i am unable to do so. On dry run it shows the correct output that is :
```
$ kubectl patch ns test -p '{"spec":{"finalizers": []}}' --type=merge --dry-run -o yaml
apiVersion: v1
kind: Namespace
metadata:
annotations:
openshift.io/sa.scc.mcs: s0:c... | spec.finalizers cannot be modified via a patch or update to a namespace resource | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90438/comments | 12 | 2020-04-24T08:22:19Z | 2022-11-23T05:28:53Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90438 | 606,133,405 | 90,438 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
```
when I d... | when I delete pods, the pods ip has been changed.but ipvs rule not change, and svc can't visit. | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90435/comments | 9 | 2020-04-24T08:01:09Z | 2020-08-04T00:32:37Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90435 | 606,121,049 | 90,435 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
1. After I de... | loading OpenAPI spec for "v1beta1.custom.metrics.k8s.io" failed with: OpenAPI spec does not exist | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90434/comments | 3 | 2020-04-24T06:35:56Z | 2020-04-28T02:36:17Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90434 | 606,077,580 | 90,434 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
```
runtime:... | debug kubectl with goland panic | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90432/comments | 2 | 2020-04-24T04:28:26Z | 2020-07-18T06:04:20Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90432 | 606,030,905 | 90,432 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
```
runtime:... | debug kubectl with goland got an panic | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90431/comments | 4 | 2020-04-24T03:49:08Z | 2020-04-24T21:46:17Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90431 | 606,018,755 | 90,431 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | kubeadm init done, apply flannel plugin done, check pods with "kubectl get pods --all-namespaces"
NAMESPACE NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE
kube-system coredns-859fd9b8b5-8g2xl 0/1 ContainerCreating 0 15h
kube-system coredns-859fd9b8b5-tjnfk ... | Failed to open current namespace: failed to Statfs "/proc/18661/task/1439572/ns/net": no such file or directory | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90429/comments | 10 | 2020-04-24T02:00:53Z | 2020-05-14T22:12:20Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90429 | 605,982,803 | 90,429 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | version: k8s v1.15.3
hardware: Bare Metal
system: centos7.5
install tool: kubespray
network plugin: flannel vxlan
The problem happened suddenly.
step1: use command : kubectl get pods -owide ,find the node of the pod is running.
step2:it is ok when access service by http://${node-ip}:{nodeport},but http:... | cannot access services by ${master-ip}:{nodePort} | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90428/comments | 3 | 2020-04-24T00:59:55Z | 2020-04-24T01:14:03Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90428 | 605,965,208 | 90,428 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | According to documentation (https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/services-networking/service/#services-without-selectors) I can create services for sending traffic to external ips.
I have to create an endpoint to do it.
There is no exact answer to the question "how service maps to endpoints"?
I suggested it maps b... | Services without selectors (bug or feature) ? | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90427/comments | 4 | 2020-04-24T00:02:16Z | 2020-05-14T22:12:11Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90427 | 605,947,892 | 90,427 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**: The latest images for the apiserver, controller-manager, and scheduler are vulnerable to [CVE-2020-1967](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-1967).
**What you expected to happen**: Latest images built using community automation should have patches to address existing security vulnerabilities... | Multiple images affected by CVE-2020-1967 | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90416/comments | 6 | 2020-04-23T20:03:07Z | 2020-06-29T19:09:37Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90416 | 605,828,526 | 90,416 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
An aks-engine cluster with a user assigned managed service cluster identity fails to authenticate to azure container registries in private clouds when the proper (acrpull) azure role assignments are in place and when there are no image pull secrets.
**What you expected to happen**:
The cluster s... | Azure credential provider does not authenticate to ACR in all clouds | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90412/comments | 5 | 2020-04-23T19:07:28Z | 2020-04-25T03:43:30Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90412 | 605,788,818 | 90,412 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
My deployment of several pods talk to each other using the fully qualified service name like http://qlik-tenants.default.svc.cluster.local:8000/api/v1/tenants ... in my latest deployment this no longer works. No service can reach any other. I tried nslookup from within some pods like this
`kubectl ... | fully qualified service addresses *.default.svc.cluster.local do not resolve while *.default.svc do | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90403/comments | 18 | 2020-04-23T11:30:03Z | 2020-05-06T13:49:32Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90403 | 605,457,536 | 90,403 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please only use this template for submitting enhancement requests -->
**> This issue is for tracking some problems I found and I plan to fix.**
**Why is this needed**:
During I fixed the bug [**bugfix: initcontainer is also taken into account when calculating resource requests**](https://github.com/kubernet... | Make the "GetResourceRequest" logic in scheduler pkg more clean | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90402/comments | 40 | 2020-04-23T11:02:39Z | 2022-01-17T14:14:44Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90402 | 605,441,577 | 90,402 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please only use this template for submitting enhancement requests -->
**What would you like to be added**:
It would be nice if want to reference my CA Cert's value from Secret or ConfigMap for the "caBundle" field of MutatingWebhookConfiguration.
**Why is this needed**:
At this point, we need to create our C... | caBundle field of MutatingWebhookConfiguration can reference CA Cert's value from Configmap or Secret | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90401/comments | 4 | 2020-04-23T10:31:35Z | 2020-04-23T19:24:31Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90401 | 605,422,914 | 90,401 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | container_cpu_load_average_10s return 0 for all container on kubernetes 1.14.3 environment when I use promethus to query
| container_cpu_load_average_10s return 0 | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90399/comments | 8 | 2020-04-23T09:42:47Z | 2022-05-30T06:46:56Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90399 | 605,390,668 | 90,399 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | I use prometheus 2.15.2 to collect kubernets 1.14.3 cadvisor monitor by following config
```
- job_name: 'kubernetes-cadvisor'
kubernetes_sd_configs:
- role: node
relabel_configs:
- target_label: __metrics_path__
replacement: /metrics/cadvisor
scheme: https
tls_c... | cadvisor output multi result for each container cpu metric | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90398/comments | 6 | 2020-04-23T09:30:47Z | 2020-09-20T12:02:23Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90398 | 605,382,927 | 90,398 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | # Progress <code>[2/5]</code>
- [X] APISnoop org-flow : [CoreV1NodeStatus.org](https://github.com/cncf/apisnoop/blob/master/tickets/k8s/CoreV1NodeStatus.org)
- [X] test approval issue : [kubernetes/kubernetes#90348](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90384)
- [ ] test pr : kuberenetes/kubernetes... | Create CoreV1Node resource lifecycle test +2 endpoint coverage | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90384/comments | 2 | 2020-04-23T01:09:20Z | 2020-05-05T19:59:16Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90384 | 605,168,063 | 90,384 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What would you like to be added**:
When pod volume exists and keepTerminatedPodVolumes is false, PodResourcesAreReclaimed would return false.
The volume path should be included in the log to facilitate debugging.
**Why is this needed**:
Currently information about the pod is logged, but not the volume:
```
Ap... | Log volume path in PodResourcesAreReclaimed | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90383/comments | 1 | 2020-04-22T23:53:14Z | 2020-06-11T03:49:24Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90383 | 605,144,726 | 90,383 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**: Was debugging ... | Missing Azure credentials should return an error and not panic | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90382/comments | 3 | 2020-04-22T23:30:01Z | 2020-06-16T01:31:15Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90382 | 605,137,118 | 90,382 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] |
**What would you like to be added**:
Our kind:deployments use nfs shares, which are group id (gid) access based. We specify the gid using the runASGroup option. However, if a deployment wants to use multiple nfs shares, we cannot do that because each share will require additional gids.
Pod type deployments suppor... | Give Deployments access to the supplementalGroups feature | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90379/comments | 8 | 2020-04-22T22:52:52Z | 2020-10-09T20:43:36Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90379 | 605,123,621 | 90,379 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What would you like to be added**:
Currently PodContainerDeletor only uses one goroutine which calls runtime.DeleteContainer() .
We can introduce additional goroutine to do container deletion.
**Why is this needed**:
Saw the following in kubelet log:
```
Apr 21 19:16:27.723578 ci-op-d4rtc-w-d-c24z7.c.opensh... | Introduce additional worker goroutine in PodContainerDeletor | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90376/comments | 7 | 2020-04-22T21:05:01Z | 2021-01-18T06:49:17Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90376 | 605,074,543 | 90,376 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please only use this template for submitting reports about continuously failing tests or jobs in Kubernetes CI -->
We recently had a bug that prevented volume deletion from succeeding in most cases. However, only 1 test case consistently failed, while the remaining ~30 had a handful of flakes. That seems to ind... | storage e2es using delayed binding don't wait for pvs to be cleaned up | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90370/comments | 4 | 2020-04-22T18:20:24Z | 2020-05-06T00:44:20Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90370 | 604,965,247 | 90,370 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
Some time... | Dns resolve did not respond within 5.000 s | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90369/comments | 6 | 2020-04-22T18:12:11Z | 2020-04-29T04:03:33Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90369 | 604,960,530 | 90,369 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | I want to setup my kubernetes locally on minikube, and mount a directory from local machine to pod, which this directory has some huge json files, because of their size I can not put them in configMap, this is my configuration:
```
containers:
- args:
- -config
- /configs/config.json
image: docker_registr... | issue with hostPath | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90363/comments | 3 | 2020-04-22T15:27:41Z | 2020-04-22T15:40:56Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90363 | 604,848,854 | 90,363 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | ### Failure cluster [6232ea27e7bd8e0e9581](https://go.k8s.io/triage#{id})
##### Error text:
```
/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/dockerized/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/storage/csi_mock_volume.go:793
Apr 20 23:29:56.396: while waiting for all CSI calls
Unexpected error:
<*errors.errorString | 0xc0035f... | unexpected CSI calls from kubelet | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90362/comments | 4 | 2020-04-22T15:08:25Z | 2020-05-04T17:37:49Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90362 | 604,834,340 | 90,362 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please only use this template for submitting enhancement requests -->
**What would you like to be added**:
I would like to allow setting the [proxier field of SpdyRoundTripper](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/fc9d1741022a8b367e8f91236d0c41111d47684d/staging/src/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/httpst... | Allow directly setting http proxy on SpdyRoundTripper | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90361/comments | 6 | 2020-04-22T14:03:10Z | 2020-09-20T22:12:24Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90361 | 604,783,770 | 90,361 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
I had a worke... | Node label is not updated and not deleted | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90359/comments | 6 | 2020-04-22T10:32:26Z | 2020-04-23T15:31:30Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90359 | 604,645,850 | 90,359 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
go mod tidy
... | k8s.io/api@v0.0.0: reading k8s.io/api/go.mod at revision v0.0.0: unknown revision v0.0.0 | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90358/comments | 2 | 2020-04-22T10:28:44Z | 2021-04-13T15:04:14Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90358 | 604,643,384 | 90,358 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
When custom... | Refresh Azure token on 403 | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90351/comments | 1 | 2020-04-22T03:08:37Z | 2020-04-29T02:11:13Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90351 | 604,418,854 | 90,351 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
For the following container:
```
Apr 17 03:45:04.403114 ip-10-0-167-215 hyperkube[1541]: E0417 03:45:04.402994 1541 kuberuntime_manager.go:935] getPodContainerStatuses for pod "8a34d0bf-805c-11ea-b463-0a58ac102063_ci(e70c5840-538d-4509-afdb-36140fee0066)" failed: rpc error: code = Unknown des... | getPodContainerStatuses should handle exited container | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90346/comments | 5 | 2020-04-21T21:14:24Z | 2020-06-11T03:48:13Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90346 | 604,290,074 | 90,346 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
After setting up the master node, worker node couldn't able to join the master. I get the error message - "couldn't validate the identity of the API Server"
**Here are the details** - I am using VMs
1. master - 2cpu, 2 GB memory
2. worker - 1 cpu, 1 GB memory
3. OS - ubuntu - Ubunt... | kubernetes - Couldn't able to join master node - error execution phase preflight: couldn't validate the identity of the API Server | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90345/comments | 29 | 2020-04-21T18:57:40Z | 2024-11-22T09:09:40Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90345 | 604,210,407 | 90,345 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | Hi,
Apologies is this is not the place for this question, but I can't seem to find an answer anywhere else. As the question states,
---
kind: Service
apiVersion: v1
metadata:
name: apim
spec:
type: ExternalName
externalName: jinoj.api.net
Error: HTTP Error 503. The service is unavailable. | is possible to call api name in externalname services? | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90344/comments | 5 | 2020-04-21T18:33:55Z | 2020-04-29T04:06:00Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90344 | 604,196,319 | 90,344 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please only use this template for submitting enhancement requests -->
**What would you like to be added**: Turning Crictl ps -a (i.e. listContainers, listPods) into a pageable API.
**Why is this needed**: This will allow clients to always be able to eventually iterate all containers/sandboxes, even when the... | ListContainers/ListPods etc. should be scalable. | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90340/comments | 5 | 2020-04-21T16:38:03Z | 2020-09-18T19:22:36Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90340 | 604,120,351 | 90,340 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | Right now, if a watch request uses an RV that's out of the window, we force the client to do a re-list.
If we cared about bandwidth between client and apiserver, we could construct a catch-up watch response type that worked like this:
* apiserver performs a list. We need to construct two things: the set of all cu... | Bandwidth efficient watch resumption | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90339/comments | 23 | 2020-04-21T16:23:09Z | 2020-07-28T18:21:29Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90339 | 604,106,499 | 90,339 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
The test ``... | Windows: subpath mount changes on a container restart if the environment variable changes | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90336/comments | 3 | 2020-04-21T15:22:43Z | 2020-07-17T08:28:18Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90336 | 604,084,730 | 90,336 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
When a pod ge... | ContainerLogMaxFiles not being honored for dead containers | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90334/comments | 74 | 2020-04-21T11:57:32Z | 2020-08-20T10:27:24Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90334 | 603,940,263 | 90,334 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
After upgrade to kubernetes 1.17.5 kubelet does not start
I couldn't find documentation about change to kubelet startup in the release notes.
Found few people running into the same issue on slack. No solution found.
**What you expected to happen**:
Kubelet starts fine same as on 1.16 branch. ... | k8s 1.17 kubelet doesn't start on coreos | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90331/comments | 5 | 2020-04-21T09:51:37Z | 2020-04-22T15:47:27Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90331 | 603,864,558 | 90,331 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | If I run:
```
$ kubectl explain pod.spec.containers | grep -EA2 '^\s*name\s+<'
name <string> -required-
Name of the container specified as a DNS_LABEL. Each container in a pod
must have a unique name (DNS_LABEL). Cannot be updated.
```
It tells me that the field is `-required-`, but if I run:
... | `kubectl explain` does not include whether a field is required | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90329/comments | 28 | 2020-04-21T08:42:19Z | 2023-12-09T03:53:39Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90329 | 603,819,251 | 90,329 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
One of our deployments failed due to the fact that there was PID collision while mounting a config map. Kubelet is using systemd-run command to mount config maps, but unfortunately, the way systemd-run chooses the scope names is pretty simple - it just uses PIDs by default to differentiate scope nam... | Kublet using PIDs for scope names can result in collisions and containers crash-looping. | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90327/comments | 9 | 2020-04-21T06:59:01Z | 2020-09-25T14:01:13Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90327 | 603,756,743 | 90,327 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] |
**What happened**:
After installing k8s v1.18.2 in combination with containerd and initializing the environment, the local container registry contains 2 pause container in different versions
**What you expected to happen**:
There is just the latest pause container in the local registry
**How to reproduce it (... | K8s initialisation pulls 2 different pause container | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90326/comments | 24 | 2020-04-21T06:58:00Z | 2020-04-28T07:06:43Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90326 | 603,756,223 | 90,326 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
We started to... | etcd crazy leadership switch | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90318/comments | 2 | 2020-04-21T00:19:12Z | 2020-04-21T00:26:14Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90318 | 603,616,553 | 90,318 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please only use this template for submitting enhancement requests -->
**What would you like to be added**: EndpointSlice support for Windows in Kube Proxy
**Why is this needed**:
The EndpointSlice API allows Kubernetes to
* Support tens of thousands of backend endpoints in a single service on cluster with t... | Endpoint Slices for Windows Kube Proxy | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90315/comments | 3 | 2020-04-20T23:20:30Z | 2020-07-02T06:12:02Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90315 | 603,595,099 | 90,315 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | ## What would you like to be added:
Currently `kubelet` is dynamically linked but is not built as a position independent executable. It would be great if it could be built with Go’s `-buildmode=pie` flag to enable ASLR.
## Why is this needed:
I’m not a security expert, and I’m not familiar with those concepts,... | Build position independent executables | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90311/comments | 21 | 2020-04-20T23:02:16Z | 2021-05-31T10:36:27Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90311 | 603,588,540 | 90,311 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | Spin-off from #88174
**What would you like to be added**:
Use maxSkew in TopologySpreadingContraint to affect relative weight of the constraint.
Exact formula to be discussed.
Some ideas:
1. `baseScore / maxSkew`, intuitive but too coarse-grained at low numbers. Goes: 100%, 50%, 33%, 25%, 20%
1. `baseScore ... | Use maxSkew in TopologySpreadingContraint to affect scoring weight | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90308/comments | 13 | 2020-04-20T21:26:10Z | 2020-05-09T01:28:20Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90308 | 603,546,151 | 90,308 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | This issue is a bucket placeholder for collaborating on the "Known Issues" additions for the 1.19 Release Notes. If you know of issues or API changes that are going out in 1.19, please comment here so that we can coordinate incorporating information about these changes in the Release Notes.
/assign @kubernetes/relea... | v1.19.0 Release Notes: "Known Issues" | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90304/comments | 9 | 2020-04-20T18:51:32Z | 2020-08-25T18:51:30Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90304 | 603,456,327 | 90,304 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
A container which had exclusive CPUs assigned to it (and an entry in /var/lib/kubelet/cpu_manager_state specifying those CPUs) was killed. When it came back, it was using the default cpuset, and its entry in /var/lib/kubelet/cpu_manager_state was gone.
**What you expected to happen**:
It should... | Container cpuset lost, apparently due to race between PostStopContainer() and new container creation | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90303/comments | 5 | 2020-04-20T17:44:20Z | 2020-07-21T13:13:06Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90303 | 603,416,853 | 90,303 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
time-shi... | time-shifting cause kubelet failed to create container | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90298/comments | 25 | 2020-04-20T13:16:44Z | 2022-11-27T09:41:09Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90298 | 603,230,508 | 90,298 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | I'm new to Kubernetes. I successfully created a deployment with 2 replicas of my Angular frontend application, but when I expose it with a service and try to access the service with 'minikube service service-name', the browser can't show me the application.
This is my docker file
FROM registry.gitlab.informa... | Why I can't reach an Angular app exposed with Kubernetes service? | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90294/comments | 5 | 2020-04-20T09:38:43Z | 2020-04-28T15:03:26Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90294 | 603,092,955 | 90,294 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
there are many kubelet warnings in the systemd logs
```
Apr 20 11:03:37 lxkubenode01 kubelet[9103]: W0420 11:03:37.275020 9103 volume_linux.go:49] Setting volume ownership for /var/lib/kubelet/pods/63c4a49f-bf23-4b87-989e-102f5fcdb315/volumes/kubernetes.io~secret/seq-token-whpfk and fsGroup s... | kubelet warnings W0420 flooding systemd logs (kubernetes 1.18.2) | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90293/comments | 10 | 2020-04-20T09:12:00Z | 2020-08-28T02:07:56Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90293 | 603,074,429 | 90,293 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
Service creat... | minikube: service created is not accessible | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90292/comments | 8 | 2020-04-20T07:27:26Z | 2022-03-07T16:13:04Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90292 | 603,007,455 | 90,292 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] |
**What happened**:
At present, the config configuration files of each component of kubernetes in github cannot be found. Can each version specify a directory to store the config file of the component?
| Can the config files of the components of each version of kubernetes be synchronized in github? | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90291/comments | 5 | 2020-04-20T06:43:44Z | 2020-09-26T11:21:46Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90291 | 602,985,480 | 90,291 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
When running many... | Incorrect job completed state | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90290/comments | 5 | 2020-04-20T02:03:25Z | 2020-06-03T14:06:05Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90290 | 602,887,125 | 90,290 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | I noticed that this code:
```
go wait.UntilWithContext(ctx, func(ctx context.Context) {
now := time.Now()
refreshAfter := now.Add(-s.refreshInterval)
var count int
for _, obj := range s.store.List() {
comments := obj.(*BugComments)
if comments.RefreshTime.Before(refreshAfter) {
s.queue.Add... | regression: wait.Forever runs twice immediately since 1.18 | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90287/comments | 17 | 2020-04-19T20:38:59Z | 2021-09-01T20:36:15Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90287 | 602,814,575 | 90,287 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What would you like to be added**:
The documentation around the APIs, e.g., as seen in field comments in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/staging/src/k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1/generated.proto, uses "white list" and "whitelist", and I suggest changing this to use allowlist instead.
For future i... | Use allowlist and denylist in public documentation | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90277/comments | 36 | 2020-04-19T10:04:06Z | 2022-07-15T00:50:51Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90277 | 602,674,701 | 90,277 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | Error updating Endpoint Slices for Service default/myapp: Error deleting myapp-pdnv9 EndpointSlice for Service default/myapp: endpointslices.discovery.k8s.io "myapp-pdnv9" not found | Error updating Endpoint Slices for Service | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90276/comments | 3 | 2020-04-19T09:57:27Z | 2020-05-14T22:08:26Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90276 | 602,673,473 | 90,276 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
I use the met... | kubelet_container_log_filesystem_used_bytes not accurate | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90272/comments | 9 | 2020-04-19T08:34:13Z | 2022-08-19T08:38:02Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90272 | 602,657,195 | 90,272 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
After creating a Pod, successfully finished Init Containers are not removed from the system and kept in "Exited" state. If we manualy remove finished init container, kubelet will restart it.
This is a very dangerous logical error that can lead to unpredictable consequences for the cluster applica... | kubelet restarts Init Сontainers when App Containers are running. | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90271/comments | 13 | 2020-04-19T08:26:44Z | 2020-12-06T10:37:10Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90271 | 602,655,809 | 90,271 |
Subsets and Splits
Unique Owner-Repo Count
Counts the number of unique owner-repos in the dataset, providing a basic understanding of diverse repositories.