issue_owner_repo listlengths 2 2 | issue_body stringlengths 0 261k ⌀ | issue_title stringlengths 1 925 | issue_comments_url stringlengths 56 81 | issue_comments_count int64 0 2.5k | issue_created_at stringlengths 20 20 | issue_updated_at stringlengths 20 20 | issue_html_url stringlengths 37 62 | issue_github_id int64 387k 2.91B | issue_number int64 1 131k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | this is a test | blablabla | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84856/comments | 3 | 2019-11-06T12:04:01Z | 2019-11-06T12:04:31Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84856 | 518,428,643 | 84,856 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/83897 broken kubemark tests (e.g. https://prow.k8s.io/view/gcs/kubernetes-jenkins/logs/ci-kubernetes-kubemark-high-density-100-gce/1191791957987299332 or https://prow.k8s.io/view/gcs/kubernetes-jenkins/logs/ci-kubernetes-kubemark-gce-scale/1191801274085937152). Failure need... | Kubemark: fake fluentd broke tests | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84855/comments | 8 | 2019-11-06T11:46:39Z | 2020-04-04T14:09:51Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84855 | 518,420,592 | 84,855 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
In kubernete... | Panic happends in kube-apiserver | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84850/comments | 3 | 2019-11-06T08:41:27Z | 2019-11-12T18:23:46Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84850 | 518,321,487 | 84,850 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | @kubernete/sig-storage-bugs
**What happened**:
I allocated 20 GB, but only 1 GB was allocated.
**What you expected to happen**:
20 GB was allocated.
**How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible)**:
```
ref: https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/run-application/run-single-instance-stateful-app... | I allocated 20 GB, but only 1 GB was allocated on Mac(Mojave) | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84840/comments | 1 | 2019-11-06T05:35:47Z | 2019-11-06T14:32:42Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84840 | 518,249,510 | 84,840 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | 06 05:20:05.832056 4780 docker_service.go:273] Setting cgroupDriver to cgroupfs
I1106 05:20:05.844597 4780 remote_runtime.go:59] parsed scheme: ""
I1106 05:20:05.844634 4780 remote_runtime.go:59] scheme "" not registered, fallback to default scheme
I1106 05:20:05.844655 4780 passthrough.go:48] ccResolver... | why my node's kubelet print "skipping pod synchronization " | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84839/comments | 6 | 2019-11-06T05:24:15Z | 2020-04-06T03:46:52Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84839 | 518,245,922 | 84,839 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What would you like to be added**:
Add a Score plugin that calls into SelectorSpread priority. Plugin name should be "DefaultPodTopologySpread"
**Why is this needed**:
Part of #83554
/sig scheduling
/assign @draveness
/priority important-soon | [migration phase 1] SelectorSpread as Score plugin | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84829/comments | 0 | 2019-11-06T01:27:21Z | 2019-11-06T13:02:01Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84829 | 518,179,994 | 84,829 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | Most of the work needed to enable Windows containers in CRI-ContainerD has been merged into containerd/containerd and containerd/cri.
Can you set up additional runs on testgrid tracking the master containerd branches?
Background
The plan for moving code from the jterry75 branch back to containerd upstream re... | Add Windows Containerd/Containerd test passes | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84822/comments | 4 | 2019-11-05T21:50:07Z | 2020-02-20T19:41:20Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84822 | 518,065,007 | 84,822 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/84622 adds code to rename ILB rules using the right format. There is code to handle legacy firewall rules and rename/delete them. This needs to be removed after k8s 1.19 once all firewall rules have been created with the new name.
/area platform/gce
/assign
| Remove handling of legacy firewall rule names in GCE ILB code | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84821/comments | 6 | 2019-11-05T21:37:50Z | 2020-04-02T21:41:54Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84821 | 518,055,576 | 84,821 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
Although I've created a psp and bound it to the statefulset via a service account, role and rolebinding, the pods created by the statefulset always bind to the default-restricted psp.
```yaml
$ kubectl get psp key-store-redis -o yaml
apiVersion: policy/v1beta1
kind: PodSecurityPolicy
meta... | PSP not binding for pod created by a statefulset | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84819/comments | 12 | 2019-11-05T21:04:10Z | 2019-11-07T07:15:16Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84819 | 518,029,841 | 84,819 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
When deploy, ... | kubectl create secret failed: Error from server (Timeout): error when creating "test-secret.json": Timeout: request did not complete within requested timeout 30s | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84818/comments | 2 | 2019-11-05T20:55:40Z | 2019-11-07T11:32:02Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84818 | 518,024,417 | 84,818 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
`kubectl patch deployment the-deployment --type json -p '[{"op":"replace","path":"/spec/template/spec/containers/0/image","value":"the-image"}]'`
resulted in `The request is invalid` message from server. When turning up the logging level `-v=8` the request body content was `{"op:replace":null,"path... | JSON Patch whitespace significant? | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84817/comments | 7 | 2019-11-05T20:45:44Z | 2019-11-08T14:53:52Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84817 | 518,018,797 | 84,817 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
Deploy kubernetes 1.16 with kubeadm and customize CNI plugin. kubelet reports Error validating CNI config. coreDNS is not getting its IP address.
**What you expected to happen**:
The CNI plugin file is working prior to 1.16. It is working fine from 1.13 to 1.15.
**How to reproduce it (as mini... | kubelet 1.16 Error validating CNI Config | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84808/comments | 10 | 2019-11-05T17:42:54Z | 2019-11-13T18:18:44Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84808 | 517,925,894 | 84,808 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please only use this template for submitting enhancement requests -->
**What would you like to be added**:
Real-time applications have stringent requirements with respect to jitter, latency, quality of service and packet loss. The current timeout values for configuring probes is in order of seconds so this wil... | Improve the readiness and liveliness "Configure Probes" timeout values for High performance networking and Real time applications | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84805/comments | 12 | 2019-11-05T16:52:37Z | 2020-08-04T00:32:33Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84805 | 517,895,240 | 84,805 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | This affects the following tests:
`
[sig-node] Downward API should provide container's limits.cpu/memory and requests.cpu/memory as env vars [NodeConformance] [Conformance]
[sig-node] Downward API should provide host IP as an env var [NodeConformance] [Conformance]
[sig-node] Downward API should provide pod UID... | CPU requests values are mutually exclusive on Windows. This should be respected when using containerd. | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84804/comments | 13 | 2019-11-05T16:04:08Z | 2020-02-20T19:30:42Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84804 | 517,866,458 | 84,804 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please only use this template for submitting reports about failing tests in Kubernetes CI jobs -->
**Which jobs are failing**:
Four sig-storage tests
**Which test(s) are failing**:
gce-master-scale-correctness
**Since when has it been failing**:
11/02
**Testgrid link**:
https://k8s-testgrid.appspot... | [Failing Test] gce-master-scale-correctness - sig-storage tests | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84803/comments | 5 | 2019-11-05T16:02:18Z | 2019-11-06T15:32:11Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84803 | 517,865,319 | 84,803 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
Refer https... | Source IPs are not preserved for UDP services on Azure | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84800/comments | 0 | 2019-11-05T14:38:55Z | 2019-11-06T20:20:36Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84800 | 517,813,615 | 84,800 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What would you like to be added**:
Enable profiling by default in the scheduler. We can do this by defaulting the CC flags to true.
**Why is this needed**:
It is useful when debugging the performance of a running cluster. API server already enables profiling by default.
/sig scheduling
/help
/milestone v1.1... | Enable profiling by default in the scheduler | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84799/comments | 1 | 2019-11-05T14:34:01Z | 2019-11-06T08:51:52Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84799 | 517,810,625 | 84,799 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please only use this template for submitting enhancement requests -->
**What would you like to be added**:
Apiserver endpoint serving `/healthz` over HTTP, no TLS.
**Why is this needed**:
Coming out of this issue: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/43784
Running our own, self-signed PKI... | apiserver http healthcheck | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84797/comments | 8 | 2019-11-05T14:08:48Z | 2020-06-18T16:32:14Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84797 | 517,795,472 | 84,797 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
coredns can not work as domain name resolution.
**What you expected to happen**:
coredns works normally, looking up domain name for particular ip address.
**How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible)**:
kubeadm makes a v1.16.0 HA cluster with three controlplane nodes ,and ngin... | HA Cluster v1.16.0 : coredns behaves unexpectedly | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84794/comments | 23 | 2019-11-05T12:48:28Z | 2020-04-02T00:11:11Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84794 | 517,752,488 | 84,794 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **Which jobs are failing**:
ci-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce-scalability-*
**Which test(s) are failing**:
Scalability load test
**Since when has it been failing**:
Failing since 10/31 but wrong versions were used for known testgrid history
**Testgrid link**:
https://k8s-testgrid.appspot.com/sig-scalability-gce#gc... | Failing 100 nodes scalability tests due to wrong k8s version used | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84791/comments | 1 | 2019-11-05T11:58:45Z | 2019-11-05T19:20:41Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84791 | 517,729,538 | 84,791 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | ```
func mapGet(in map[string]string, key string, lock sync.Mutex) string {
lock.Lock()
defer lock.Unlock()
res := in[key]
return res
}
func BenchmarkMapGet(b *testing.B) {
lock := sync.Mutex{}
testMap := map[string]string{}
for i := 0; i < 5000; i++ {
testMap[fmt.Sprintf("key-%d", i)] = fmt.Sprin... | Unlock mutex by defer causes more than double waste of time | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84789/comments | 3 | 2019-11-05T11:30:42Z | 2019-11-11T08:20:08Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84789 | 517,716,904 | 84,789 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] |
**What would you like to be added**:
[WaitForStableCluster](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/b735a17163ac7c7c39d9888932c815260c3ceaba/test/e2e/framework/util.go#L2364:6) is used at the beginning of some e2e scheduler tests to wait until the cluster is in a stable state. It currently waits until all ex... | WaitForStableCluster in e2e tests waits for pods to get deleted | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84787/comments | 5 | 2019-11-05T10:34:34Z | 2019-11-07T21:28:06Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84787 | 517,687,161 | 84,787 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **Which jobs are failing**:
```
apg-conformance-stable-k8s-master (ci-cluster-api-provider-gcp-make-conformance-stable-k8s-ci-artifacts)
```
**Since when has it been failing**:
`4th Nov 15:20 PST`
**Testgrid link**:
https://testgrid.k8s.io/sig-release-master-informing#capg-conformance-stable-k8s-master
**... | [Failing Test] apg-conformance-stable-k8s-master (ci-cluster-api-provider-gcp-make-conformance-stable-k8s-ci-artifacts) | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84786/comments | 7 | 2019-11-05T10:26:42Z | 2019-11-06T16:35:26Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84786 | 517,682,765 | 84,786 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
Currently, ... | cpumanager: cpu manager state checkpoint file validate failed after node crash or kubelet down | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84783/comments | 6 | 2019-11-05T09:51:14Z | 2020-04-04T19:14:51Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84783 | 517,662,960 | 84,783 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | ```
[root@node40 traefik]# kubectl version
Client Version: version.Info{Major:"1", Minor:"16", GitVersion:"v1.16.2", GitCommit:"c97fe5036ef3df2967d086711e6c0c405941e14b", GitTreeState:"clean", BuildDate:"2019-10-15T19:18:23Z", GoVersion:"go1.12.10", Compiler:"gc", Platform:"linux/amd64"}
Server Version: version.Info... | kubernetes 1.16.2 no matches for kind "DaemonSet" in version "extensions/v1beta1" | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84782/comments | 6 | 2019-11-05T09:37:50Z | 2019-11-07T16:36:01Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84782 | 517,655,577 | 84,782 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | Hi, I want to ask a question.
If kubernetes evicts a pod(DiskPressure), will it send a SIGTERM signal or SISKILL signal?
And, if more, in what scenario will it send a SIGTERM, and in what scenario will it send a SISKILL. | Eviction signal -- SIGKILL? | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84778/comments | 6 | 2019-11-05T09:22:49Z | 2020-04-07T21:27:47Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84778 | 517,647,210 | 84,778 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
Encountered... | connection reset with no fix by changing conntrack parameters | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84767/comments | 10 | 2019-11-05T03:48:40Z | 2019-12-15T18:21:22Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84767 | 517,532,677 | 84,767 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!--
STOP -- PLEASE READ!
GitHub is not the right place for support requests.
If you're looking for help, check [Stack Overflow](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/kubernetes) and the [troubleshooting guide](https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/debug-application-cluster/troubleshooting/).
You can also pos... | Useless parameter 'resourceVersion' in Client-go | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84765/comments | 4 | 2019-11-05T02:57:47Z | 2019-11-19T02:49:56Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84765 | 517,520,279 | 84,765 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What would you like to be added**:
Ephemeral container can be removed from pod gracefully.
**Why is this needed**:
In our K8s cluster, there are many deployed pods. We aim to use ephemeral containers as troubleshooting containers. Thus, for troubleshooting, many ephemeral containers are potentially created.
Once... | Support removing ephemeral container from pod | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84764/comments | 48 | 2019-11-05T02:41:45Z | 2024-04-16T05:22:26Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84764 | 517,516,059 | 84,764 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
When I use cr... | RemoveImage call dose not real take effect in dockershim | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84762/comments | 7 | 2019-11-05T02:07:32Z | 2020-04-07T21:27:47Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84762 | 517,506,969 | 84,762 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
Can't delete pods without `--force -grace-period 0`. In other words, pods never getting deleted automatically, and always in terminating state, and I always have to manually force-delete them after deleting the deployments.
**What you expected to happen**:
I expect k8s to automatically delete po... | Can't delete pods without forcing: pods always in terminating state | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84760/comments | 8 | 2019-11-05T01:09:01Z | 2020-04-03T12:44:52Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84760 | 517,491,603 | 84,760 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:'
Kubectl drops all annotations when one is not a valid string. for example true/false/on/off
**What you expected to happen**:
EIther warn on bad annoations or fail on the first one.
**How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible)**:
Take this foo.yaml
```
apiVersion: ext... | Kubectl drops all annotations when one is not a valid string. | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84759/comments | 4 | 2019-11-05T00:58:04Z | 2019-11-05T07:05:01Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84759 | 517,488,586 | 84,759 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
Due to a race condition I ended up with a kubernetes pod scheduled to a node but on kubelet restart it failed kubelet's canAdmitPod() and ended up with a status of "Topology Affinity Error". I then deleted the other pods (such that there was now room for this pod on the node) but it remained in the... | Pods which fail kubelet's canAdmitPod() due to "Topology Affinity Error" end up "stuck" in limbo rather than going back to "pending" | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84757/comments | 8 | 2019-11-05T00:27:56Z | 2020-04-14T23:13:43Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84757 | 517,480,212 | 84,757 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | Hi All,
I have created a GKE cluster from scratch on Gcloud selecting the latest available version:
**1.14.7-gke.14**
I need to resolve from all pods in a specific namespace an external DNS record pointing to an external DNS server so I have edited the kube-dns config map adding the following:
```
data:
s... | Kube-DNS is not able to resolve an external DNS on GKE cluster | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84751/comments | 2 | 2019-11-04T22:23:44Z | 2019-11-05T15:50:17Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84751 | 517,438,890 | 84,751 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
When using the "--topology-manager-policy=single-numa-node" option for kubelet, on a host with multiple NUMA nodes, and creating multiple pods in quick succession, it's possible for pods to be allocated CPUs that don't abide by the topology manager policy.
**What you expected to happen**:
The po... | Race condition when creating pods, Topology Manager Policy sometimes ignored | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84749/comments | 7 | 2019-11-04T21:25:54Z | 2020-05-05T05:29:58Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84749 | 517,412,951 | 84,749 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**: Timed out crea... | Create kubeadm token for joining nodes with 24h expiration | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84743/comments | 6 | 2019-11-04T19:19:10Z | 2019-11-08T14:48:48Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84743 | 517,349,117 | 84,743 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | The NodeAuthorizer & NodeAuthenticator tests are currently feature guarded, e.g. `[Feature:NodeAuthorizer]`. Unfortunately no test suites are currently running these tests, so we don't have any test signals.
We should be running these tests in CI. Options include:
1. Remove the `[Feature:....]` label on the test,... | Enable NodeAuthorizer and NodeAuthenticator tests in E2E | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84742/comments | 15 | 2019-11-04T19:17:49Z | 2021-02-06T20:29:37Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84742 | 517,348,498 | 84,742 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | When running CSI migration tests focussing on multi-attach scearnios with GCE PD inline volumes that are read-only, the following error pops up in the logs and the second attachment takes > 6 mins:
```
W1102 20:18:11.821919 1 reconciler.go:369] Multi-Attach error for volume "testpd1" (UniqueName: "kubernetes.... | Multi-attach scenarios for CSI-migrated-inline-volumes throw warnings and take a while | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84736/comments | 4 | 2019-11-04T18:03:29Z | 2019-11-06T06:19:09Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84736 | 517,314,242 | 84,736 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What would you like to be added**:
Change the **external** [DebuggingConfiguration]( https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/staging/src/k8s.io/component-base/config/v1alpha1/types.go#L61-L65
) member variables to pointer types.
**Why is this needed**:
So that we can set their default values to s... | Change the booleans in DebuggingConfiguration to pointer type | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84734/comments | 2 | 2019-11-04T17:52:47Z | 2019-11-04T23:29:06Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84734 | 517,309,221 | 84,734 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | I'm trying to set up SSO between our (regular, not AKS) kubernetes clusters and Azure AD. Currently trying with kubectl binary installed on my computer.
It works when no groups are involved, but we want to filter by security group (accounts on AAD are synced from our onprem Active Directory), no kube RBAC involved.
... | failing kubernetes auth with oidc and azure apps and authorization with a specified Security Group | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84730/comments | 13 | 2019-11-04T16:28:18Z | 2023-11-14T20:07:41Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84730 | 517,263,496 | 84,730 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | In 1.16 we added `x-kubernetes-list-type` fields for CRDs. Lists of type map and set have uniqueness invariants on keys (map) and whole elements (set). These invariants must be checked during create and update validation in the CR registry.
To be backported to 1.16. | list-type set and map lack CR validation | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84724/comments | 14 | 2019-11-04T14:03:35Z | 2020-02-26T05:02:41Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84724 | 517,173,224 | 84,724 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please only use this template for submitting enhancement requests -->
**What would you like to be added**:
**Why is this needed**:
| https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84720/comments | 2 | 2019-11-04T12:34:02Z | 2019-11-05T05:54:56Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84720 | 517,122,843 | 84,720 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please only use this template for submitting enhancement requests -->
**What would you like to be added**:
**Why is this needed**:
| Why is this needed | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84719/comments | 1 | 2019-11-04T12:33:38Z | 2019-11-05T05:54:25Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84719 | 517,122,633 | 84,719 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
**What you ... | What happened | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84717/comments | 1 | 2019-11-04T12:27:19Z | 2019-11-05T05:54:39Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84717 | 517,119,751 | 84,717 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
The system ca... | ioctl incorrect pod broadcast address | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84716/comments | 5 | 2019-11-04T12:06:35Z | 2019-11-15T11:27:15Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84716 | 517,110,201 | 84,716 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please only use this template for submitting reports about failing tests in Kubernetes CI jobs -->
**Which jobs are failing**:
gce-cos-master-serial
**Which test(s) are failing**:
[sig-storage] Pod Disks detach in a disrupted environment [Slow] [Disruptive] when node is deletedChanges
[sig-storage] Pod ... | [Failing test] gce-cos-master-serial (ci-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce-serial) | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84715/comments | 9 | 2019-11-04T11:55:30Z | 2019-11-18T10:16:45Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84715 | 517,104,916 | 84,715 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | The kubebernetes version I used was 1.16.2 and the following error occurred when I started kublet:
```
Nov 04 18:22:19 node47 systemd[1]: Started Kubernetes Kubelet Server.
Nov 04 18:22:40 node47 kubelet[11617]: E1104 18:22:40.193361 11617 aws_credentials.go:77] while getting AWS credentials NoCredentialProvider... | Initialization error I encountered when starting the kubelet | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84709/comments | 6 | 2019-11-04T10:31:22Z | 2020-04-02T13:22:34Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84709 | 517,064,051 | 84,709 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
When static... | cpumanager: kubelet should log fatal error and exit rather than panic when cpu manager fails on startup | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84703/comments | 1 | 2019-11-04T09:08:44Z | 2020-01-20T15:25:38Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84703 | 517,025,655 | 84,703 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | When using the resourcelock of the endpoints type, panic may be triggered if the update of the election record(e.g. tryAcquireOrRenew) fails.
```
func (el *EndpointsLock) Update(ler LeaderElectionRecord) error {
if el.e == nil {
return errors.New("endpoint not initialized, call get or create first")
}
record... | resourcelock *EndpointsLock.Update may trigger panic | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84729/comments | 16 | 2019-11-04T04:11:01Z | 2020-03-21T00:56:39Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84729 | 517,242,528 | 84,729 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**: dumplicate vo... | no dumplicate volumes are verified when creating a statefulset | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84698/comments | 5 | 2019-11-04T02:20:51Z | 2020-03-18T08:37:26Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84698 | 516,931,890 | 84,698 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please only use this template for submitting enhancement requests -->
**What would you like to be added**:
is it stable in the latest kubernetes feature ?
https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/encrypt-data/
**Why is this needed**:
It will be awesome in getting this feature status stable and ... | EncryptionConfiguration Status | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84697/comments | 8 | 2019-11-04T02:11:42Z | 2019-11-25T20:27:52Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84697 | 516,930,544 | 84,697 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **Which jobs are failing**:
`gce-master-scale-correctness (ci-kubernetes-e2e-gce-scale-correctness)`
**Which test(s) are failing**:
```console
[sig-storage] Pod Disks schedule a pod w/ RW PD(s) mounted to 1 or more containers, write to PD, verify content, delete pod, and repeat in rapid succession [Slow] using 1 ... | [Failing Test] gce-master-scale-correctness (ci-kubernetes-e2e-gce-scale-correctness) | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84691/comments | 5 | 2019-11-03T18:44:16Z | 2019-11-06T23:32:14Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84691 | 516,871,122 | 84,691 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **Which jobs are failing**:
`kubeadm-kinder-master-on-1-16 (ci-kubernetes-e2e-kubeadm-kinder-master-on-1-16)`
**Which test(s) are failing**:
`task-05-cluster-info`
**Since when has it been failing**:
`31 Oct 04:02 PST`
**Testgrid link**:
https://testgrid.k8s.io/sig-release-master-informing#kubeadm-kinder-m... | [Failing Test] kubeadm-kinder-master-on-1-16 (ci-kubernetes-e2e-kubeadm-kinder-master-on-1-16) | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84690/comments | 8 | 2019-11-03T18:34:10Z | 2019-11-06T21:09:07Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84690 | 516,869,775 | 84,690 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please only use this template for submitting enhancement requests -->
**What would you like to be added**:
.travis.yml file
**Why is this needed**:
It is missing!
should i work on this?
| Codecov coverage! | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84682/comments | 5 | 2019-11-03T10:52:04Z | 2020-04-07T21:27:47Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84682 | 516,810,690 | 84,682 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | This is a pre-requisite issue for https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84473
## Overview

+ [ ] Break the circular dependency between configMapManager, secretManager and kube... | Break the circular dependency in kubelet | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84681/comments | 5 | 2019-11-03T06:49:50Z | 2024-09-05T13:16:48Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84681 | 516,789,023 | 84,681 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
**master cannot communicate with some pod ip**
one of pod ip + port : ***172.20.5.54:8881***
node1 ip : 192.168.100.135 hostname node135
master1 ip : 192.168.100.131 hostname master1 keepalived vip: 192.168.100.188,192.168.100.88
master2 ip : 192.168.100.132 hostname master2
master3 ... | master cannot communicate with some pod ip | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84680/comments | 4 | 2019-11-03T05:54:52Z | 2019-11-04T02:11:03Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84680 | 516,785,143 | 84,680 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **Which jobs are failing**:
`kubeadm-kind-master (ci-kubernetes-e2e-kubeadm-kind-master)`
**Since when has it been failing**:
`31 Oct 00:13 PDT`
**Testgrid link**:
https://k8s-testgrid.appspot.com/sig-release-master-informing#kubeadm-kind-master
**Reason for failure**:
```console
[etcd] Announced new etcd... | [Failing Test] kubeadm-kind-master (ci-kubernetes-e2e-kubeadm-kind-master) | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84676/comments | 11 | 2019-11-02T13:40:08Z | 2019-11-06T21:09:12Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84676 | 516,596,843 | 84,676 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **Which jobs are failing**:
`gce-cos-master-slow (ci-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce-slow)`
**Which test(s) are failing**:
```
[sig-storage] Pod Disks schedule a pod w/ RW PD(s) mounted to 1 or more containers, write to PD, verify content, delete pod, and repeat in rapid succession [Slow] using 1 containers and 2 PDs
```... | [Failing Test] gce-cos-master-slow (ci-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce-slow) | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84675/comments | 6 | 2019-11-02T13:25:26Z | 2019-11-06T10:12:29Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84675 | 516,592,496 | 84,675 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | kubenetes v1.13.x
ab pressure measurement ,use iptables kube-proxy
when deploy rolling update
# ab -n 100000 -c 5 http://xx.xx.xx.xx:40235/version
Benchmarking 10.143.253.218 (be patient)
Completed 10000 requests
Completed 20000 requests
apr_socket_recv: Connection reset by peer (104)
Total of 24391 re... | iptables kube-proxy problem | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84671/comments | 9 | 2019-11-02T08:07:18Z | 2019-12-25T20:53:00Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84671 | 516,524,583 | 84,671 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | Minimal Repro:
- Create 2 different disks
- Create 2 Pods each using one of the disks
- Start both pods on the same node
You will notice **one** of the disks gets `NodeStageVolume`ed to a path: `/var/lib/kubelet/plugins/kubernetes.io/csi/pv/mypvc/globalmount`, then **both** disks are `NodePublishVolume`ed from `/... | CSI Migration Inline Volumes treating multiple volumes as the same | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84668/comments | 5 | 2019-11-02T00:31:45Z | 2019-11-15T10:57:57Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84668 | 516,415,890 | 84,668 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | Volume hostpath is created as directory even if FileOrCreate is in config.
Install tool:
RKE version v0.3.0
Kubernetes version 1.15.4
Docker version: (docker version,docker info preferred)
On kubernetes nodes: Docker version 18.09.9, build 039a7df9ba
Operating system and kernel: (cat /etc/os-release, uname... | Pod with volume mounted w FileOrCreate created as directory instead of file. | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84663/comments | 8 | 2019-11-01T21:38:07Z | 2019-11-06T16:24:17Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84663 | 516,359,740 | 84,663 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | env:
vm15
centos7.5
k8s:1.16.2
dashboart:v2.0.0-beta5
Error is now。。。。。
[root@bigdata001 k8s]# kubectl get pods --all-namespaces -o wide
NAMESPACE NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE IP NODE NOMINATED NODE READINESS GATES
default nginx-86c57db685-l847h 1/1 Running 0 36m 172.17.0.3 192.168.186.129
kube-system c... | i am crazy,please help me.@ admin | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84653/comments | 4 | 2019-11-01T16:29:31Z | 2019-11-01T17:24:33Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84653 | 516,217,233 | 84,653 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **Which jobs are failing**:
`gce-cos-master-scalability-100 (ci-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce-scalability)`
**Since when has it been failing**:
`1st Nov 01:32 PDT`
**Testgrid link**:
https://testgrid.k8s.io/sig-release-master-blocking#gce-cos-master-scalability-100
**Reason for failure**:
```console
W1101 14:14... | [Failing Test] gce-cos-master-scalability-100 (ci-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce-scalability) | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84652/comments | 4 | 2019-11-01T14:36:54Z | 2019-11-02T13:45:56Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84652 | 516,151,799 | 84,652 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] |
/sig scheduling
**What would you like to be added**:
Expose `PredicateMetadataProducer` from constructed `Scheduler` object.
**Why is this needed**:
Cluster Autoscaler is internally creating scheduler instance to perform predicates simulations.
Up until now we used `factory.NewConfigFactory` for bootstr... | Scheduler: Cannot get PredicateMetadataProducer when using scheduler.New (Cluster Austoscaler compatibility) | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84651/comments | 1 | 2019-11-01T14:34:44Z | 2019-11-05T14:28:56Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84651 | 516,150,543 | 84,651 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **Which jobs are failing**:
`gci-gce-ingress (ci-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce-ingress)`
**Since when has it been failing**:
`1st Nov 05:49 PDT`
**Testgrid link**:
https://testgrid.k8s.io/sig-release-master-blocking#gci-gce-ingress
**Reason for failure**:
```console
W1101 13:51:26.747] _=./test-infra/jenkins/boo... | [Failing Test] gci-gce-ingress (ci-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce-ingress) | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84650/comments | 6 | 2019-11-01T14:29:23Z | 2019-11-04T12:19:51Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84650 | 516,147,345 | 84,650 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
In #83472, we... | Should allow certain custom predicate/priority to be configured multiple times | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84645/comments | 4 | 2019-11-01T14:07:35Z | 2019-11-08T14:29:21Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84645 | 516,134,242 | 84,645 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | ### i use my self pki for kubeadm
```
cfssl gencert -ca=/etc/kubernetes/pki/ca.crt \
-ca-key=/etc/kubernetes/pki/ca.key \
-config=ca-config.json \
-hostname=127.0.0.1,10.96.0.1,$IP1,$IP2,$IP3,$HOST_VIP,$HOSTNAME1,$HOSTNAME2,$HOSTNAME3,kubernetes,kubernetes.default,kubernetes.default.svc,kubernetes.default.sv... | failed to write or validate certificate "apiserver": certificate apiserver is invalid: x509: certificate is valid for | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84644/comments | 3 | 2019-11-01T14:05:45Z | 2019-11-04T20:38:57Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84644 | 516,133,134 | 84,644 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
We're running a EKS cluster for a couple of months now, and notice a serious amount of secrets being kept in the cluster (>15k!). Looking further into that we found that these were secrets of type `kubernetes.io/service-account-token`, which were likely not used anymore -- the service account for ... | Secrets of type 'kubernetes.io/service-account-token' are not garbage collected | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84642/comments | 7 | 2019-11-01T12:10:57Z | 2019-11-29T09:25:49Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84642 | 516,075,083 | 84,642 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | /kind bug
when i create a notebook with default configuration, but the pod is created failed, and here is my logs:
**_$kubectl describe -n maysnow sts nb-001_**
```
Name: nb-001
Namespace: maysnow
CreationTimestamp: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 17:53:13 +0800
Selector: statefulset=nb-00... | contacting the APIServer to create the pod failed | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84636/comments | 7 | 2019-11-01T09:33:48Z | 2020-03-30T17:16:24Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84636 | 516,005,755 | 84,636 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please only use this template for submitting enhancement requests -->
**What would you like to be added**:
Hi. When upgrading Kubelet, it overrides the default configuration file placed in `/var/lib/kubelet/config.yaml`. But I don't think this is what people always want to happen.
In my case, I change this ... | Kubelet overrides default configuration file when upgraded | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84634/comments | 4 | 2019-11-01T08:10:32Z | 2020-03-30T10:09:21Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84634 | 515,969,210 | 84,634 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | How to resolve that issue ?
"cniVersion": "0.3.1"
kube-system coredns-5644d7b6d9-47k52 0/1 Running 0 3h29m
kube-system coredns-5644d7b6d9-8vmzv 0/1 Running 0 3h29m
kubectl describe pod/coredns-5644d7b6d9-47k52 -n kube-system
Name: coredns-5644d7b6d9-47k52
Namespace: kube-system
Priority: 2000000000
Priori... | How to resolve that issue ? Readiness probe failed: HTTP probe failed with statuscode: 503 | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84632/comments | 7 | 2019-11-01T04:42:50Z | 2020-03-30T13:12:20Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84632 | 515,908,965 | 84,632 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
A k8s cluster... | kube-proxy clean udp conntrack after node network resumed | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84629/comments | 5 | 2019-11-01T03:50:52Z | 2019-11-01T04:30:09Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84629 | 515,895,912 | 84,629 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
when using 'kubeadm join --control-plane --certificate-key' to add a master node, this error happened: "the Secret does not include the required certificate or key - name: external-etcd.key, path: /etc/etcd/apiserver-etcd-client.key"
**What you expected to happen**:
download the certification o... | error happened when using 'kubeadm join --control-plane --certificate-key' to add a new master node if we are using external etcd | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84627/comments | 5 | 2019-11-01T03:26:04Z | 2019-11-04T20:22:47Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84627 | 515,888,862 | 84,627 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
For a single container pod with `AllowPrivilegeEscalation=false`, setting the seccomp profile at pod or container level results in vastly different syscalls to be whitelisted.
**What you expected to happen**:
The same (or similar) pod seccomp profile should work at both container or pod lev... | Seccomp at POD level always requires too many syscalls | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84623/comments | 8 | 2019-11-01T00:13:45Z | 2020-07-14T22:55:42Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84623 | 515,833,503 | 84,623 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **Why is this needed:**
The original PR, [#77592](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/77592), was made to address issue [#77095](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/77095). It ended up getting pretty large and difficult to iterate on and difficult for others to review.
I've decided to break th... | Pull kubectl functions out of e2e test framework utils | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84615/comments | 17 | 2019-10-31T19:16:40Z | 2021-03-12T19:48:27Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84615 | 515,680,412 | 84,615 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please only use this template for submitting reports about failing tests in Kubernetes CI jobs -->
**Which jobs are failing**:
containerd-l2bridge-windows-master
containerd-overlay-windows-master
**Which test(s) are failing**:
[k8s.io] [sig-node] Pods Extended [k8s.io] Delete Grace Period should be su... | tests: Delete Grace Period should be submitted and removed fails on Windows containerd | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84610/comments | 14 | 2019-10-31T17:12:05Z | 2019-12-20T17:29:59Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84610 | 515,603,476 | 84,610 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please only use this template for submitting reports about failing tests in Kubernetes CI jobs -->
**Which jobs are failing**:
containerd-l2bridge-windows-master
containerd-overlay-windows-master
**Which test(s) are failing**:
[k8s.io] Container Runtime blackbox test when running a container with a ne... | tests: should be able to pull from private registry with secret on Windows containerd | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84609/comments | 5 | 2019-10-31T16:48:19Z | 2020-03-17T23:21:20Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84609 | 515,586,748 | 84,609 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please only use this template for submitting enhancement requests -->
**What would you like to be added**:
It would help the go modules ecosystem if k8s.io repos had tags that are semver format. From a user perspective it would also be nice if the tag matched the corresponding k8s version. This means today... | Tag k8s.io repos with semver-like tags | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84608/comments | 14 | 2019-10-31T16:09:14Z | 2019-12-11T01:59:28Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84608 | 515,557,927 | 84,608 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
Whenever a pod is added or removed from kubernetes, the new network connections for completely unrelated pods gets momentarily interrupted. I have not reproduced this with the keep-alive option enabled. It doesn't matter where the pod or the test is running but I generally tested from a kube maste... | Added/Removing pod interrupts network for completely unrelated pod | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84603/comments | 11 | 2019-10-31T14:35:57Z | 2019-11-12T21:58:22Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84603 | 515,483,422 | 84,603 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please only use this template for submitting enhancement requests -->
**What would you like to be added**:
Currently the topology manager options does take care of attaching the cpu cores to the local numa node, but it does not consider the pci device in case SR-IOV VFs are used. As in that case to get best pe... | The Scheduler should be Numa Aware and options should be given in the pod defination for the type of Numa awareness required. | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84601/comments | 52 | 2019-10-31T14:03:32Z | 2024-09-06T14:10:38Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84601 | 515,458,796 | 84,601 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
We uncovered an issue in our application that runs inside a Docker container and makes url requests to services that are exposed on localhost ports. When trying to connect to the urls using IPv6 address for localhost [::1], all the requests are failing with connection refused error. But the same req... | Container is unable to resolve IPv6 localhost address | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84598/comments | 13 | 2019-10-31T13:40:25Z | 2022-09-10T20:22:08Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84598 | 515,442,536 | 84,598 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
Though there are available CPUs on NUMA nodes, the topology manager 'restricted' policy doesn't admit the pod and returns with "Topology Affinity Error".
**What you expected to happen**:
The 'restricted' policy would be good to admit the pod as long as there are available CPUs in the system.... | pod creation fails with Topology Affinity Error for 'restricted' topology manager policy | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84597/comments | 5 | 2019-10-31T13:26:42Z | 2019-10-31T15:18:16Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84597 | 515,432,349 | 84,597 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
Housekeeping sync loop finds an orphaned pod and tries to clean it up. The kubepod slice, as seen below, is not removed by `cleanupOrphanedPodCgroups -> go pcm.Destroy(val)` with no indication as to why. This leads to the docker scope timing out and entering a failed state. The returned error(s) f... | Errors returned from pod_container_manager_linux Destroy to remove a pods cgroup are swallowed | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84595/comments | 13 | 2019-10-31T13:03:34Z | 2020-05-17T01:59:37Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84595 | 515,416,749 | 84,595 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | As we all know is that kubernetes support three node to support HA, because etcd is also use raft to get its consistency.
Just like the following picture which i get from internet:

But in my scenario,I d... | How about if I want use k8s in two node cluster? | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84587/comments | 6 | 2019-10-31T09:50:09Z | 2020-04-03T04:36:54Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84587 | 515,296,731 | 84,587 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
when leader master is down,other masters can not became leader, so all the pod that need to be evicted are all pending.........,so i need to restart container kube-scheduler and kube-controller, after that everything is ok.........
**Anything else we need to know?**:
the kube-scheduler and kube-... | multi master with nginx as vip, when leader master is down,the other masters can not became leader | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84586/comments | 7 | 2019-10-31T09:23:18Z | 2020-04-02T22:30:56Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84586 | 515,280,860 | 84,586 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please only use this template for submitting enhancement requests -->
**What would you like to be added**:
Some of our storage e2e tests write and read data in the host FS (*/tmp*), using the hostPath storage plugin.
By default, containers running on SELinux environments can only read/write data in direct... | Run unprivileged containers in storage e2e tests | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84585/comments | 20 | 2019-10-31T09:12:55Z | 2021-10-20T12:01:58Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84585 | 515,275,101 | 84,585 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please only use this template for submitting enhancement requests -->
**Allow to skip some phases during upgrade**:
It will be great to have the `--skip-phases` option for the `kubeadm upgrade` command, or better have a key in the ClusterConfiguration manifest to specify phases to be skip.
**Why is this nee... | kubeadm: allow to use the skip-phases option during upgrade | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84584/comments | 4 | 2019-10-31T08:43:34Z | 2019-11-04T20:47:29Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84584 | 515,258,488 | 84,584 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
The name of p... | The name of pod created by daemonset will be truncated at 64 characters | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84580/comments | 8 | 2019-10-31T07:24:18Z | 2020-04-07T21:27:51Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84580 | 515,220,613 | 84,580 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] |
**What happened**:
i have 5nodes clutser, and the service with type NodePort and `externalTrafficPolicy: Local` that to acquire source IP. the deplotment selected by this service is assigned with `nodeSelector` to a fixed node.
request is ok through the fixed work node, but dont work from any other guest nod... | NodePort dont response on guest node. | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84577/comments | 1 | 2019-10-31T03:09:44Z | 2019-10-31T07:06:31Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84577 | 515,127,284 | 84,577 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | Current audit logs can include the request/response body when logged at `Request` or `RequestResponse` level. However, the object included has been deserialized and reserialized, and can lose some information in the conversion process.
There should be an optional way to include the raw request body. For example, the... | [FR] Include raw request body in audit logs | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84571/comments | 26 | 2019-10-30T20:26:58Z | 2022-04-13T19:09:48Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84571 | 514,960,523 | 84,571 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What would you like to be added**:
The pre-work for this is done, so converting it to map-reduce should be straightforward and includes the following steps:
1) Factor out [topologyPairToScore calculation](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/pkg/scheduler/algorithm/priorities/interpod_affinity.g... | Convert interpod affinity priority to a "map-reduce" pattern | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84570/comments | 3 | 2019-10-30T19:07:10Z | 2019-11-07T12:35:43Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84570 | 514,914,515 | 84,570 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
I have copied... | Copying file into pod more than 2 times using kubectl cp throws error | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84564/comments | 5 | 2019-10-30T16:35:19Z | 2020-03-28T22:34:19Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84564 | 514,815,091 | 84,564 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | <!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks!
If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security/
-->
**What happened**:
1. Created a ... | Unable to copy files using kubectl cp to pod in a volume mount back by pvc | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84557/comments | 5 | 2019-10-30T14:32:35Z | 2020-03-28T16:28:20Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84557 | 514,719,778 | 84,557 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **Which jobs are failing**:
`aks-engine-azure-1-16-windows (ci-kubernetes-e2e-aks-engine-azure-1-16-windows)`
**Since when has it been failing**:
`29 Oct 17:03 PDT`
**Testgrid link**:
https://testgrid.k8s.io/sig-release-master-informing#aks-engine-azure-1-16-windows
**Reason for failure**:
```
W1030 12:4... | [Failing Test] aks-engine-azure-1-16-windows (ci-kubernetes-e2e-aks-engine-azure-1-16-windows) | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84556/comments | 9 | 2019-10-30T13:40:29Z | 2019-11-06T16:34:33Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84556 | 514,677,766 | 84,556 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What would you like to be added**:
[PrioritizeNodes](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/pkg/scheduler/core/generic_scheduler.go#L698) is an exported function in genericScheduler.go, it accepts many parameters that already exist in genericScheduler struct, we should just make it a private function i... | make PrioritizeNodes a private function of genericScheduler | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84555/comments | 2 | 2019-10-30T13:07:17Z | 2019-10-31T16:11:53Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84555 | 514,655,029 | 84,555 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What would you like to be added**:
When the pod is scheduled to the `permit` phase and I delete the pod, the pod still remains in the `waitingPodsMap` until the plugin allow/reject/timeout(Especially when waiting for a long time).
**Why is this needed**:
We need to take the initiative to delete the data in the... | Remove the pod Info in waitingPodsMap When the pod is deleted | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84554/comments | 2 | 2019-10-30T13:02:41Z | 2019-11-05T23:31:20Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84554 | 514,651,959 | 84,554 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **Which jobs are failing**:
`build-packages-debs (ci-release-build-packages-debs)`
**Since when has it been failing**:
29 Oct 11:47 PDT
**Testgrid link**:
https://testgrid.k8s.io/sig-release-master-informing#build-packages-debs
**Reason for failure**:
```console
curl -sSL --fail --retry 5 \
"https://gi... | [Failing Test] build-packages-debs (ci-release-build-packages-debs) | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84548/comments | 6 | 2019-10-30T10:41:33Z | 2019-11-06T10:12:52Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84548 | 514,560,831 | 84,548 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **This is a low priority, mainly documentation-related issue.**
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/staging/src/k8s.io/apiextensions-apiserver/pkg/apis/apiextensions/types_jsonschema.go describes `JSONSchemaProps` as [JSON Schema Draft-04](https://json-schema.org/specification-links.html#draft-4). H... | JSONSchemaProps reports to be Draft-04 but is used by OpenAPI v3 schema | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84546/comments | 4 | 2019-10-30T07:12:07Z | 2019-10-31T10:27:25Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84546 | 514,445,927 | 84,546 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
corrupted files in rook volume caused kubelet restart and kubelet restart failed, then caused node Notready
```
Oct 28 10:25:08 shared2-worker-07 kubelet: I1028 10:25:07.998533 28311 plugins.go:547] Loaded volume plugin "kubernetes.io/csi"
Oct 28 10:25:08 shared2-worker-07 kubelet: I1028 10:25:... | corrupted files caused kubelet restart and kubelet restart failed | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84545/comments | 8 | 2019-10-30T06:40:40Z | 2020-06-07T13:09:59Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84545 | 514,433,437 | 84,545 |
[
"kubernetes",
"kubernetes"
] | **What happened**:
I have a node with a CIDR allocated using k8s ipam:
```
$ kubectl get nodes -o yaml
<...>
spec:
podCIDR: 10.47.128.0/24
podCIDRs:
- 10.47.128.0/24
<...>
```
but kubenet cannot allocate addresses for pods. Here is how kubenet configures host-local ipam:
```
I1029 22:... | Kubenet not working with pod CIDRs from node spec in 1.16 | https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84541/comments | 12 | 2019-10-29T23:55:43Z | 2020-01-10T04:13:05Z | https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/84541 | 514,304,076 | 84,541 |
Subsets and Splits
Unique Owner-Repo Count
Counts the number of unique owner-repos in the dataset, providing a basic understanding of diverse repositories.