text stringlengths 1 372 |
|---|
access the tool from the landing page that appears once you have launched |
DevTools (see installation instructions). |
<topic_end> |
<topic_start> |
analysis tab |
the analysis tab allows you to inspect a single snapshot |
of size information. you can view the hierarchical structure |
of the size data using the treemap and table, |
and you can view code attribution data |
(for example, why a piece of code is included in your compiled |
application) using the dominator tree and call graph. |
<topic_end> |
<topic_start> |
loading a size file |
when you open the analysis tab, you’ll see instructions |
to load an app size file. drag and drop an app size |
file into the dialog, and click “analyze size”. |
see generating size files below for information on |
generating size files. |
<topic_end> |
<topic_start> |
treemap and table |
the treemap and table show the hierarchical data for your app’s size. |
<topic_end> |
<topic_start> |
using the treemap |
a treemap is a visualization for hierarchical data. |
the space is broken up into rectangles, |
where each rectangle is sized and ordered by some quantitative |
variable (in this case, size in bytes). |
the area of each rectangle is proportional to the size |
the node occupies in the compiled application. inside |
of each rectangle (call one a), there are additional |
rectangles that exist one level deeper in the data |
hierarchy (children of a). |
to drill into a cell in the treemap, select the cell. |
this re-roots the tree so that the selected cell becomes |
the visual root of the treemap. |
to navigate back, or up a level, use the breadcrumb |
navigator at the top of the treemap. |
<topic_end> |
<topic_start> |
dominator tree and call graph |
this section of the page shows code size attribution data |
(for example, why a piece of code is included in your |
compiled application). this data is visible |
in the form of a dominator tree as well as a call graph. |
<topic_end> |
<topic_start> |
using the dominator tree |
a dominator tree is a tree where each node’s |
children are those nodes it immediately dominates. |
a node a is said to “dominate” a node b if |
every path to b must go through a. |
to put it in context of app size analysis, |
imagine package:a imports both package:b and package:c, |
and both package:b and package:c import package:d. |
in this example, package:a dominates package:d, |
so the dominator tree for this data would look like: |
this information is helpful for understanding why certain |
pieces of code are present in your compiled application. |
for example, if you are analyzing your app size and find |
an unexpected package included in your compiled app, you can |
use the dominator tree to trace the package to its root source. |
<topic_end> |
<topic_start> |
using the call graph |
a call graph provides similar information to the dominator |
tree in regards to helping you understand why code exists |
in a compiled application. however, instead of showing |
the one-to-many dominant relationships between nodes of code |
size data like the dominator tree, the call graph shows the many-to-many |
relationships that existing between nodes of code size data. |
again, using the following example: |
the call graph for this data would link package:d |
to its direct callers, package:b and package:c, |
instead of its “dominator”, package:a. |
this information is useful for understanding the |
fine-grained dependencies of between pieces of your code |
(packages, libraries, classes, functions). |
<topic_end> |
<topic_start> |
should i use the dominator tree or the call graph? |
use the dominator tree if you want to understand the |
root cause for why a piece of code is included in your |
application. use the call graph if you want to understand |
all the call paths to and from a piece of code. |
a dominator tree is an analysis or slice of call graph data, |
where nodes are connected by “dominance” instead of |
parent-child hierarchy. in the case where a parent node |
dominates a child, the relationship in the call graph and the |
dominator tree would be identical, but this is not always the case. |
in the scenario where the call graph is complete |
(an edge exists between every pair of nodes), |
the dominator tree would show the that root is the |
dominator for every node in the graph. |
this is an example where the call graph would give |
you a better understanding around why a piece of code is |
included in your application. |
<topic_end> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.