text stringlengths 89 3.77k ⌀ | category stringclasses 4
values | saul-7b_perplexity float64 1.76 124 ⌀ | llama2-7b_perplexity float64 1.8 127 ⌀ | mistral-7b_perplexity float64 1.76 157 ⌀ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Foreclosure by another lienholder cannot have acted automatically as acceleration of the Note or began accrual of Respondent’s rights to enforce the Note. “A claim generally accrues when facts come into existence that authorize a claimant to seek a judicial remedy.” Sowell, 416 S.W.3d at 598. But foreclosure by another... | Party Submissions | 11.049442 | 10.583758 | 11.49428 |
Respondents insist that Oncor is attempting to avoid a binding agreement, upon which the District purportedly has relied to its detriment. See Respondents’ Brief at 4-5 & 28-30. But again, Oncor does not seek to undermine or change the agreement the parties made to settle Sharyland’s protests of the subjective market v... | Party Submissions | 8.88208 | 10.090779 | 10.366789 |
Weatherford’s argument is based on the single premise that the SWDA’s domestic sewage exclusion was misapplied by the Court of Appeals. | Party Submissions | 17.42109 | 18.565561 | 21.938326 |
Rafiei acknowledges that he relies upon the affidavit of David Joeckel to show that arbitration is disproportionately expensive when compared with litigation. Brief at 28. But there are a number of reasons the Joeckel affidavit does not support that assertion. | Party Submissions | 8.98097 | 11.749876 | 12.983227 |
The common practice of staying district court proceedings during the pendency of an interlocutory appeal taken under § 16(a) reflects common sense. If the district court could move forward with pre-trial and trial proceedings while the appeal on arbitrability was ongoing, then many of the asserted benefits of arbitrati... | Party Submissions | 9.224296 | 9.225664 | 9.990809 |
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CREDIT AND GUARANTY AGREEMENT, dated as of November 20, 2018 (this “Amendment”), to that certain Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2018 (as amended, modified, restated or supplemented from time to time in accordance with its terms, the “Credit Agreement”), among United Rentals (N... | Contract | 2.121805 | 1.991702 | 2.131779 |
As explained above, the requested documents will show: ( i ) whether Serbia intended to place the bus loop at Obnova’s premises from the very beginning of the process of the 2013 DRP’s preparation; and ( ii ) whether either the Secretariat for Urban Planning and Construction or the Public Urban Planning Company “Urban ... | Legal Decisions | 5.589926 | 5.787227 | 5.742634 |
Third, Rafiei’s calculation of a $6,000 limit for “fees and expenses up front” does not make any sense. His affidavit indicates that he makes $20,000 a month, or $240,000 a year. CR115, ¶1. He specifically indicates that his disposable income after expenses is $6,000 a month, which is $72,000 a year. Id. at ¶ 2. | Party Submissions | 6.653846 | 7.749754 | 7.546045 |
Petitioners only lose the protection of the fair-report privilege if the Program leaves Barina in a “worse light than the proceedings themselves.” KBMT, 492 S.W.3d at 716. Because the Program does not, the privilege applies. The Court should grant review to address this important issue. | Party Submissions | 19.150629 | 19.846342 | 21.244713 |
Nutrition Act of 1966 to prohibit the use of cell-cultivated meat under the school lunch program and the school breakfast program. | Legislation | 10.617097 | 8.777073 | 12.047289 |
When the Court considered whether a breach of an implied warranty, under the UCC article 2, violated an applicable legal standard, the Court again noted that the nature of an implied warranty is a tort. See JCW Elecs., Inc. v. Garza, 257 S.W.3d 701, 705 (Tex. 2008). | Party Submissions | 7.69647 | 7.103601 | 8.732551 |
In response to Question No. 4, the jury found Steven Terry liable for $6 million in exemplary damages and Newsom, Terry & Newsom, L.L.P. liable for $1 million in exemplary damages. The issue of attorney's fees damages arising from the property owners’ post-judgment collection efforts and the bankruptcy proceedings agai... | Party Submissions | 6.106632 | 6.043304 | 6.357358 |
Flaven’s only “duty” to the BNC Sellers was a contractual one, which the BNC Sellers argued in the underlying trial, cannot form the basis of an RTP designation. See 17RR740–45. Although the BNC 30 Sellers’ trial counsel in the underlying trial took a different position in the malpractice trial, HSMiller (who relied on... | Party Submissions | 17.621267 | 16.329466 | 20.166586 |
For the reasons stated herein, we deny the Martinez Family's petition for writ of mandamus but conclude that Hellas has met its burden to establish its right to mandamus relief. We therefore grant a conditional writ ordering the district court presiding over the tort suit (Travis County No. D-1-GN-19-004416) to abate t... | Party Submissions | 6.107637 | 6.450455 | 7.266273 |
Mesquite Logistics ultimately filed a motion to dismiss Berrelez's suit based on the *72 exclusive remedy provision of the Act and Berrelez's failure to exhaust her administrative remedies thereunder. Berrelez responded, arguing her claims were “excepted” from the Act pursuant to section 406.032(1) (C), which provides ... | Party Submissions | 4.612546 | 4.714109 | 4.867735 |
Any and all documents representing “ the basic report of the Republic Geodetic Authority No. 952-297/03 of April 9, 2003 ” as referred to on page 1 of the Additional Report Regarding the Registration of Enterprise in Real Estate Cadaster prepared by the Republic Geodetic Institute of Serbia on 20 May 2003 (exhibit R-13... | Legal Decisions | 12.604605 | 12.646382 | 12.753202 |
The Tribunal’s analysis 586. Article 40(1) does not impose on the Tribunal the obligation to apply the principle by which arbitration costs are “borne by the unsuccessful party,” but instead states that the Tribunal may deviate from this rule at its discretion if it determines that a different apportionment is reasonab... | Legal Decisions | 6.268173 | 5.630733 | 6.256427 |
The Walkers’ experts’ reports were insufficient to meet their burden under section 74.351 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code for all reasons identified in Baptist St. Anthony’s Brief on the Merits. Issue No. 2: The Walkers’ experts’ reports failed to “explain, to a reasonable degree, how and why [Dr. Castill... | Party Submissions | 6.052038 | 6.155808 | 7.045227 |
F. ... If it is determined [by audit] that royalty owner has not been correctly paid all sums owed him, then Lessee shall reimburse the requesting royalty owner for all costs and expenses incurred by Lessor for such audit, together with all unpaid revenues, late charges, and interest thereon. | Party Submissions | 13.892136 | 13.196001 | 15.230511 |
Most of the time when a lawyer is accused of gross negligence in rendering professional services, he has either missed a limitations deadline so that the claim is entirely barred, or he has some personal interest in making the decision he made. There is neither here. This was a reasonable judgment call (an issue the co... | Party Submissions | 13.793865 | 14.315336 | 15.034928 |
Archives originated from USTR or the State Department) that contain information regarding the U.S. position in the NAFTA renegotiation/USMCA negotiation and do not contain “any reference to positions of other parties or agreed text.” • Claimants request that the Tribunal order Respondent to produce responsive documents... | Legal Decisions | 5.776032 | 6.215247 | 6.161199 |
The Lawyers’ third excuse is that Terry allegedly made a good- faith judgment call not to designate Flaven. Lawyers’ Brief at 76-77. | Party Submissions | 41.596066 | 41.581013 | 48.755753 |
Samson needs to substitute terms to support its erroneous interpretation. The leases distinguish between Late Charges and “interest.” They refer to Late Charges in only two places: arts. XVII.C and XVII.F (the audit provision). If an audit determines a royalty owner “has not been correctly paid all sums owed him,” the ... | Party Submissions | 8.017886 | 7.790919 | 8.342921 |
By: _________________________ Eric C. Opiela State Bar No. 24039095 eopiela@ericopiela.com I hereby certify that I have reviewed the above Reply Brief and have concluded that every factual statement in the said petition is supported by competent evidence included in the appendix or record. I further certify that the do... | Party Submissions | 6.261147 | 8.137688 | 8.571839 |
What is the legal situation under Clause 11 of the Investment Agreement specifically in relation to Claimant’s La Rosita lot and the alleged requirement to obtain a CUSTF (Authorisation for Soil-Use Change in Forested Terrains / Autorización de Cambio de Uso del Suelo en Terrenos Forestales)? | Party Submissions | 15.255747 | 17.525333 | 16.7157 |
That standard has been met here. Contrary to Yellowfin’s assertion, see Resp. Br. 19-21, this case involves not a simple delay in enforcement but rather an intentional failure by the holders of the junior indebtedness to contact Santos or inform her whether any balance was still outstanding after foreclosure. | Party Submissions | 18.538567 | 20.227926 | 26.029758 |
Taub v. Aquila Southwest Pipeline Corp., 93 S.W.3d 451, 456 n. 8 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2002, no pet.) (citing BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY 564 (6th ed.1990)). | Party Submissions | 3.437334 | 4.111869 | 4.110705 |
The guaranty also contained a termination clause that provided: that any and all obligations of the Guarantor under this Guaranty shall terminate upon the construction and completion of the historic tax credit rehabilitation of that certain building generally located at 1111 Rusk Street in Houston, Texas. | Party Submissions | 8.335047 | 9.626923 | 10.094163 |
E : As stated in Respondent’s Counter-Memorial, the case file for this decision does not exist as this is a draft decision.192 In fact, this draft concerns the same case file from Claimant’s request no. 32. | Legal Decisions | 30.087784 | 24.96453 | 26.653687 |
Despite that Mann has very little to no memory of the pedestrian-vehicle accident itself, there is no conclusive evidence that he was in the course and scope of employment as claimed by Bay. Thus, it is a bona fide fact question for the jury to decide if Bay has standing to assert the defense at all. | Party Submissions | 16.56973 | 17.830088 | 19.916313 |
Nor can Respondents reframe the court of appeals’ decision as the mere enforcement of a “voluntary agreement” by which Westwood abandoned its ultimate right to possess the premises or gave up its claims in district court (Resp. 21-22, 33)—because Westwood did no such thing. Respondents place great weight on the fact th... | Party Submissions | 10.381674 | 10.444229 | 10.607753 |
The time crunch is Relator’s fault. According to Relator’s evidence, Justice Devine’s petition was filed on November 14. Exs.A,C. At that time, Relator was the only individual who could have possibly known about these alleged defects. Yet he waited until December 27, 2023, to bring his administrative challenge to Chair... | Party Submissions | 9.461176 | 10.50596 | 10.44661 |
This Court has appellate jurisdiction to evaluate the Court of Appeals’ decision if the appeal presents a question of law important to the jurisprudence of the state. TEX. GOV’T CODE § 22.001(a). However, it would be imprudent to exercise such jurisdiction to grant review of a case that does not present a novel questio... | Party Submissions | 7.008101 | 7.378702 | 7.039249 |
Foremost, Oncor ignores the express language of section 1.111(e)(2) which makes such agreements final with regard to any matter “which may be corrected under § 25.25.” The statute is not specific to section 25.25(c-1) or (d), it simply refers to section 25.25, which presumably encompasses all sub-sections of section 25... | Party Submissions | 8.649461 | 9.018712 | 9.49421 |
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to enter into this Agreement for the purpose of establishing the terms and conditions of RSUs (as defined below) that have been granted to the Participant. | Contract | 5.372641 | 5.013163 | 6.888831 |
There are no disputed facts in this case. At this point, there is no dispute that (1) when Cochran received the Alabama judgment on July 13, 2001, for purposes of section 406.075, he "elected" to recover benefits under Alabama's workers' compensation laws; 11 (2) Cochran did in fact receive benefits under Alabama's law... | Party Submissions | 5.923515 | 6.078299 | 6.008611 |
In any case, the Court of Appeals’ decisions cited by Yellowfin do not warrant any respect as to the issues here. One case cited by Yellowfin does not address the statute of limitations issue at all. See Washington v. Yellowfin Loan Servicing Corp., 2022 WL 16646409, at *9 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Nov. 3, 2022, no pet.) (... | Party Submissions | 4.247794 | 4.392364 | 4.600907 |
To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide for a joint meeting of the Congress to receive a presentation from the Comptroller General of the United States regarding the audited financial statement of the executive branch, and for other purposes. | Legislation | 4.507883 | 3.433525 | 4.556135 |
This case presents a similar pattern. While the nurses are accused of not gathering or reporting additional data, there is no indication that the outcome would have been any different if they had. There is no explanation of what Dr. Castillo (or anyone else) would have done differently if the additional data was obtain... | Party Submissions | 7.101499 | 6.748719 | 7.694784 |
Death Benefit. In the event of the Participant’s death, his or her designated Beneficiary(ies) shall be entitled to a Death Benefit as set forth in Section 6.1(c). The Death Benefit shall be equal to the vested portion of the Participant’s unpaid vested Account Balances and shall be payable in a single lump sum. | Contract | 3.720348 | 3.32753 | 4.019126 |
Devine disingenuously cites to John Doe No. 1 v. Reed, 561 U.S. 186, 191 (2010) for a jumbled assertion that signers “’express the view”’ that the candidate ‘”should be considered by the whole electorate’” – even ‘”if the signer is agnostic’” as to whether that candidate should be elected” Id. at 195. However, that cas... | Party Submissions | 5.733837 | 5.733896 | 5.986148 |
Misstatements of the law. But these repeated phrases also did something more harmful by misleading and confusing the jury and misstating the court’s obligation to strike an RTP if no evidence has been produced for its responsibility. | Party Submissions | 55.61448 | 39.969467 | 59.587776 |
MVP appears to rely on the doctrine of equitable estoppel. Id. at 52 (citing, e.g., In re Longoria, 470 S.W.3d 616, 625 n.2 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2015, orig. proceeding)). MVP does not explain what aspect of equitable estoppel it asserts, but this Court has not recognized the “concerted-misconduct doctrine” i... | Party Submissions | 4.580792 | 4.901804 | 4.709198 |
This letter contains certain objections to the Report on the Strategic Environmental Assessment of the 2013 DRP. The requested document is relevant and material to assess whether the Secretariat for Environmental Protection considered Obnova’s rights to its premises at Dunavska 17 -19 and 23 during the preparation of t... | Legal Decisions | 17.441835 | 17.356758 | 18.328842 |
The Klorer-Reed owners argued their facts differed enough from Hooks to overcome Samson’s ratification defense, but ultimately lost that argument. See T.S. Reed, 521 S.W.3d at 38. But Samson contended that they could not even oppose Samson on the merits due to whatever Hooks had held. According to Samson, Hooks supplie... | Party Submissions | 11.699096 | 9.794521 | 11.796212 |
This RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made as of the Date of Grant set forth above by and between UNITED RENTALS, INC., a Delaware corporation, having an office at 100 First Stamford Place, Suite 700 Stamford, CT 06902 (the “Company”), and Awardee (together with the Company, the “Parties”), current... | Contract | 2.963199 | 3.0404 | 3.011105 |
As MVP seems to concede, MVP’s Brief at 28, MVP was required to “(1) establish the existence of a valid [forum-selection] agreement; and (2) show that the claims asserted are within the scope of the agreement.” Ridge Nat. Res., L.L.C. v. Double Eagle Royalty, L.P ., 564 S.W.3d 105, 117 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2018, no pet.)... | Party Submissions | 4.230504 | 4.677586 | 4.443434 |
Beginning with Sonic's argument that it is entitled to reimbursement under section 409.009 because the voluntary payments were made prior to Cochran's election to recover benefits under Alabama's laws, although Sonic's payments preceded the Alabama judgment, this does not necessitate the conclusion that Sonic is theref... | Party Submissions | 9.258673 | 9.397491 | 10.247473 |
Allowing parties to avoid their accrued breaches of contract through delay is the antithesis of Texas lending law. Indeed, the Opinion directly conflicts with the Austin Court of Appeals’ decision in Person v. MC-Simpsonville, SC-1-UT, LLC, No. 03-20-00560-CV, 2021 WL 3816332 (Tex. App.—Austin Aug. 27, 2021, no pet.), ... | Party Submissions | 6.678836 | 6.987827 | 7.210388 |
Article 4 Italy shall carry out administrative and on-the-spot checks in accordance with Articles 59 and 60 of Regulation (EU) 2021/2116 of the European Parliament and of the Council ( ). | Legislation | 6.249851 | 6.206704 | 7.634445 |
As with a person who chooses not to wear a seatbelt and then is injured in an accident, or a person who ingests illegal substances and then dies, HSMiller’s negligent decisions also should have been considered when the malpractice jury was deciding who contributed to causing the underlying judgment against it. See Nabo... | Party Submissions | 8.454894 | 8.329508 | 8.955867 |
This document is current through the 2023 Regular Session, the 1st C.S. and the 2nd C.S. of the 88th Legislature; and the 2023 ballot proposition contingencies to date. | Party Submissions | 8.685042 | 7.921706 | 8.740299 |
Petitioner claims the appellate court “mischaracterized” its own standard of review to justify its request for rehearing, and created a split in authority on how to determine motions to compel arbitration when two contracts are at issue. | Party Submissions | 13.673474 | 12.924476 | 12.519939 |
A parent-child relationship may be terminated if a trial court finds that a parent has “knowingly placed or knowingly allowed the child to remain in conditions or surroundings which endanger the physical or emotional well-being of the child.” TEX. FAM. CODE § 161.001(b)(1)(D). When deciding whether or not there is clea... | Party Submissions | 3.511612 | 4.071948 | 4.06012 |
This is a pleading burden, as this Court has determined that “[i]f additional facts would be necessary to state. .. a viable claim falling within a waiver or exception to immunity, then the plaintiff has not affirmatively demonstrated the court's jurisdiction. In such a case, a plea to the jurisdiction should be grante... | Party Submissions | 10.069621 | 11.764946 | 14.432688 |
Cadaster Plans ( in Serbian: katastarski planovi ) that have been prepared between 1946 and 1995 and include Dunavska 17-19, Dunavska 23 and the Surrounding Area. | Legal Decisions | 13.736109 | 15.6471 | 12.990314 |
First, there is no showing that Joekel’s arbitration experience is with claims similar to Rafiei’s claims. Joeckel handles “employment and nonsubscriber cases.” CR108. That is an important practice area, but the cases are not shown to be similar to high value products liability personal injury cases. Recall that Rafiei... | Party Submissions | 20.28527 | 23.840603 | 24.30496 |
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Petitioner HAKAN ALI OKSUZLER prays this Court reverse the judgment of the court of appeals as to the characterization of the marital assets in question and affirm the judgment of the trial court; or, alternatively, reverse the judgment of the court of appeals as to the rendering of judg... | Party Submissions | 6.359674 | 7.049382 | 8.218748 |
This document is current through the 2023 Regular Session; the 1st C.S.; the 2nd C.S.; the 3rd C.S. and the 4th C.S. of the 88th Legislature; and the November 7, 2023 election results. | Party Submissions | 4.423625 | 3.996976 | 5.107457 |
The Court of Appeals, therefore, appropriately dismissed their claims, and its decision should be affirmed. Dr. Castillo also prays the Court tax her costs of appeal against the Walkers and grant her all other relief as this Court deems just. | Party Submissions | 14.748232 | 17.493118 | 20.034658 |
To direct the Federal Communications Commission to establish a program to make grants available to States to inform Medicaid enrollees, SNAP participants, and low-income residents of potential eligibility for the Af-fordable Connectivity and Lifeline programs of the Commission, and for other purposes. | Legislation | 7.08252 | 8.04708 | 7.169703 |
Broders v. Heise, 924 S.W.2d 148, 153 (Tex.1996) (quoting Tex. R. Evid. 702). Under the TMLA, a witness offering opinion testimony on causation must be otherwise qualified “ under the Texas Rules of Evidence. ” See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 73.351(r)(5)(C). Texas Rule of Evidence 702, in turn, instructs that a witn... | Party Submissions | 4.061016 | 4.348128 | 4.374694 |
To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to require the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation to test a model to improve access to specialty health services for certain Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries. | Legislation | 4.561616 | 3.978542 | 3.914954 |
Arbitration, the exact paragraphs of which they reference: See Request for Arbitration, par.31-32, pp. 9-10 and Exhibit 20. | Legal Decisions | 19.873846 | 22.078732 | 22.397356 |
Just so. This Court should dismiss Walker’s petition for failure to comply with Rule 52.3(e) or deny it as coming too late. | Party Submissions | 17.808327 | 18.30965 | 26.613745 |
The trial court’s order made the jurisdictional resolution a priority, while allowing Galovelho to request leave to amend its pleadings if it wished to do so. By – 25– failing to seek leave to amend, Galovelho has failed to preserve error for our review. We overrule Gal ovelho’ s sixth issue. | Party Submissions | 14.87567 | 21.807598 | 20.271603 |
Sept. 21, 2021) and M.S.A. § 334.01 (“interest shall not be compounded”); North Dakota ( see Haider v. Montgomery, 423 N.W.2d 494, 495 (N.D. 1988) and N.D.C.C., 47-14-09 (“in the computation of interest the same may not be compounded”); South Dakota ( see S.D.C.L. § 51A-12-15); and Wisconsin ( see WISC. STATS ANN. §138... | Party Submissions | 5.994404 | 5.482203 | 6.882409 |
Seabron and Mr. Heo waived an appraisal and a determination by the Court of the fair market value of the Property. | Party Submissions | 21.181118 | 26.589226 | 31.157831 |
To redesignate the Richard H. Poff Federal Building located at 210 Franklin Road Southwest in Roanoke, Virginia, as the ‘‘Reuben E. Lawson Fed-eral Building’’, and for other purposes. | Legislation | 10.281235 | 7.88706 | 9.424397 |
In Shankle v. B-G Maintenance Management of Colorado, Inc., 163 F.3d 1230, 1235 (10th Cir. 1999), the court found that requiring an employee to pay for one-half the arbitrator’s fees failed to pass the “accessible forum” requirement for federal statutory claims. This Court has interpreted Shankle as “holding that fee-s... | Party Submissions | 4.793912 | 4.461528 | 4.888916 |
Bay is not arguing on appeal that Mann is covered under Bay's own workers' compensation policy so that argument is waived on appeal. Nonetheless, the *12 uncontested summary judgment evidence demonstrates that Bay's non-ROCIP policy specifically excludes Bay employees assigned to Valero's Bill Greehey Refinery. 26 Thus... | Party Submissions | 21.278751 | 24.650896 | 28.142355 |
R: [...] Hay que decir que la empresa lo hizo: interpuso un juicio de amparo, al menos está documentado en el expediente, el 431 del 2022 ante el juez séptimo del distrito de Quintana Roo, y pidió la suspensión. Lo que ocurrió es que pidió la suspensión o reclamó actos con relación a predios distintos a La Ros... | Party Submissions | 11.734534 | 20.803543 | 15.139202 |
RLB respectfully requests the Court grant mandamus relief and vacate the court of appeals’ opinion and instructions to the trial court to dismiss the Texas Lawsuit. RLB requests such other relief to which it is entitled. | Party Submissions | 10.195427 | 13.09626 | 14.486446 |
Wilbarger CAD, as a political subdivision of the state, is immune from the present action under the DJA because governmental immunity bars DJA actions against the state and its political divisions absent a legislative waiver. See TEX. TAX CODE § 6.01(c); City of El Paso v. Heinrich, 284 S.W.3d 366, 373 (Tex. | Party Submissions | 6.802906 | 7.687158 | 7.557105 |
The case of Zeon Chemicals, L.P. v. Harris Cty. Appraisal Dist., No. 14-20-00798-CV, 2022 WL 619681 (Tex. App. – Houston [14th Dist.] March 3, 2022, no pet. ) is not opposed. Therein, the appraisal district and property owner entered a § 1.111(e) agreement regarding value, but did not enter any agreement regarding Zeon... | Party Submissions | 5.971199 | 6.803719 | 6.059965 |
The focus of the alleged malpractice claim concerned decisions counsel in the underlying trial made regarding a purported responsible third party. The RTP issue was a core issue at trial. HSMiller frames its issue as an intellectual conundrum facing all trial judges in legal malpractice cases. It asserts that legal mal... | Party Submissions | 27.065052 | 23.338343 | 29.521336 |
To direct the Federal Communications Commission to issue reports after activation of the Disaster Information Reporting System and to make improvements to network outage reporting, and for other purposes. | Legislation | 12.610992 | 10.82474 | 12.593829 |
Pildegovics claims, and Norway denies, that Norway’s actions resulted in Sea & Coast’s business drying up as North Star and its other customers ceased harvesting snow crab and thus no longer required the services of Sea & Coast. | Legal Decisions | 30.583582 | 40.945248 | 34.86647 |
Contemporaneous documents concerning any information about, due diligence on, or inquiry into, the rights of Obnova as regards the Objects and the Dunavska Plots and/or Obnova's entitlement to compensation in relation to the 2013 DRP obtained by Mr Broshko from 2012 onwards, and in particular between 24 February 2016 a... | Legal Decisions | 7.531967 | 7.650682 | 7.776451 |
To authorize rural health facilities to use certain Federal agricultural credit assistance for the purpose of refinancing debt obligations, updating necessary services, technology, and equipment, and supporting ancillary needs. | Legislation | 29.192356 | 23.723837 | 30.572025 |
Pierce also is irrelevant here because the objection in this case was made to the two paraphrased non-statutory instructions that directly addressed a single, major issue running throughout trial: to survive a motion to strike Flaven as an RTP, was Terry required to show more than a simple breach of contract? Since the... | Party Submissions | 17.552418 | 17.997885 | 18.93944 |
IT IS ORDERED that until the child reaches age seven (7), the electronic communication shall be for a period of up to fifteen (15) minutes. | Party Submissions | 10.419911 | 16.031055 | 16.007662 |
It is Respondent's case that Claimants have not discharged their burden of proof in establishing that Kalemegdan has made an "investment" within the meaning of both Article 1(1) of the Cyprus-Serbia BIT and Article 25(1) of the ICSID Convention. They have provided no evidence that Kalemegdan made a contribution or othe... | Legal Decisions | 7.397762 | 7.279314 | 7.003083 |
To require reports on critical mineral and rare earth element resources around the world and a strategy for the development of advanced mining, refining, separation, and processing technologies. | Legislation | 14.882284 | 13.04291 | 15.149365 |
Second, given the vague wording of Serbia’s request, potential responsive documents would cover, for example, any forms of communication between Coropi’s shareholders and/or Coropi’s directors and Claimants’ lega l or other advisors. There are potentially hundreds of such responsive documents. A search for all such doc... | Legal Decisions | 14.258789 | 14.114956 | 15.590688 |
Several of Weatherford’s statements of fact assume evidence expressly excluded by the Trial Court and mischaracterize the facts as they relate to Midland’s sewer system. As such, the City provides this restated Statement of the Facts. | Party Submissions | 21.793642 | 23.858355 | 27.900928 |
Mr. Lukas Montoya Lévy Kaufmann-Kohler 3-5 rue du Conseil-Général P.O. Box 552 CH-1211 Geneva 4 Switzerland lukas.montoya@lk-k.com 8.6. The Assistant shall submit his claims for fees and expenses to the ICSID Secretariat on a quarterly basis. | Legal Decisions | 11.173159 | 10.240156 | 10.443163 |
This Court in 2015 reversed the First Court of Appeals’ initial decision in Hooks and remanded it for further action. Samson still insisted that the prior First Court of Appeals decision in Hooks bound the other owners in the severed case as to “all issues the Supreme Court’s decision did not reverse or address”: Samso... | Party Submissions | 12.166149 | 9.572712 | 12.186073 |
Arbitration Rule 6 13.1. The ICSID Secretariat shall be the channel of written communications between the Parties and the Tribunal. | Legal Decisions | 10.238266 | 10.465095 | 10.971412 |
The Election Code’s prohibition on individuals signing multiple candidates’ petitions burdens both signers’ and candidates’ First Amendment rights and corresponding speech and association rights under Texas law. Signers “express the view” that the candidate “should be considered by the whole electorate”—even “if the si... | Party Submissions | 5.116575 | 5.281791 | 5.444338 |
Given the Respondent’s objections regarding the lack of specific mention in the Request for Arbitration, and for the sake of efficiency, the Claimant is prepared to withdraw the Request. | Legal Decisions | 14.538063 | 10.749494 | 13.81025 |
First Year of Eligibility. In the case of the first (1st) year in which an Eligible Employee becomes eligible to participate in the Plan, if permitted by the Committee, he or she has up to thirty (30) days following his or her initial eligibility to submit a Compensation Deferral Agreement with respect to Compensation ... | Contract | 3.235705 | 3.284162 | 3.511897 |
Petitioner ’s request for rehearing should be denied. The Appellate Court’s Opinion does not conflict with the past precedent of this Court, nor does it create a split of authority. The Appellate Court properly applied the correct standard of review through every step of its analysis. Furthermore, the opinions of this ... | Party Submissions | 6.412977 | 6.422806 | 6.89489 |
Buttercup Pool ’s written safety policy requires camps to actively supervise campers with at least one camp counselor for every ten campers. Under the policy, if a camp does not have enough counselors present to satisfy this requirement, the camp should be denied entry to the pool. Some evidence in the record suggests ... | Party Submissions | 6.003859 | 7.361416 | 7.005 |
This case is the result of Oncor filing a motion under TEX. TAX CODE § 25.25(c) to attempt to avoid that agreement. | Party Submissions | 17.508886 | 18.388931 | 22.89863 |
Eleven months later, Dunn filed a motion to strike the designation of responsible [*3] third parties. She urged, in part, that Chapter 33 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code, which includes the responsible third party statute, does not apply to the case because it is an action to collect benefits under the workers'... | Party Submissions | 5.78297 | 6.21614 | 6.497609 |
Separation from Service Benefit. Separation from Service Benefit means the benefit payable to a Participant under Sections 6.1(a) and 6.2(a) of the Plan as a result of the Participant’s Separation from Service. | Contract | 3.29502 | 3.372491 | 3.98436 |
The election by Executive to not renew any Successive Term pursuant to Section 1.1 shall not be a termination for Good Reason and shall not entitle Executive to Severance Pay. However, the election by the Company to not renew any Successive Term pursuant to Section 1.1 shall be deemed to be a termination without Cause ... | Contract | 4.569641 | 5.255111 | 5.945509 |
In April 1997, almost two years after the incident, Gaetjen filed the underlying negligence suit against Luby's. On December 10, 1997, after discovery revealed information about Aguirre's past criminal record and after urging by Luby's counsel, TIG reopened Gaetjen's claim. The parties proceeded to a benefit review con... | Party Submissions | 4.255477 | 4.400853 | 4.614439 |
The Tribunal’s analysis A) Overview 530. As per its previous findings, the Tribunal will calculate the damages Respondent must pay Claimant based on the finding that an indirect creeping expropriation and a violation of both the FET and the umbrella clauses exist, to the extent stated in each section. | Legal Decisions | 22.82208 | 18.111015 | 20.961636 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.