text stringlengths 89 3.77k ⌀ | category stringclasses 4
values | saul-7b_perplexity float64 1.76 124 ⌀ | llama2-7b_perplexity float64 1.8 127 ⌀ | mistral-7b_perplexity float64 1.76 157 ⌀ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Statement of Reasons included these statements but the extension was not granted is not a volte face on risk allocation or a flip-flop on the extension.1395 Claimants appear to invoke the Statement of Reasons as a public statement of MINEM’s position rather than the Draft Supreme Decree legislation itself.1396 In eithe... | Legal Decisions | 30.321842 | 21.726418 | 27.549438 |
Id., at Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 74.401(a)(2). This contemplates that the lawsuit will center on the treatment of the illness, injury or condition of the patient, not the adequacy of the workplace or in this case, procedures for the identification of infants upon discharge from the hospital. | Party Submissions | 10.07969 | 10.878619 | 12.003921 |
These documents were contained in hardcopy or electronic files on computers, phones, hard drives and/or USB keys belonging to the Claimant that were seized by the Respondent either during his arrestation or his detention and not returned to the Claimant since then. The requested information is therefore within the poss... | Legal Decisions | 12.094222 | 12.84508 | 12.831432 |
Making emergency supplemental appropriations in line with the President’s request in response to the ongoing attack on Ukraine’s sovereignty by Russia and in response to the attacks in Israel for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2024, and for other purposes. | Legislation | 7.360981 | 7.334461 | 7.153925 |
Tex. Bus. & Com. Code § 272.001. Section 272.01 applies “only to a construction contract concerning real property located in this state.” Id. § 272.001(a). If the section applies, a forum-selection clause making any conflict arising under the contract subject to litigation in the courts of another state “voidable by th... | Party Submissions | 5.268385 | 6.071297 | 5.524796 |
The court of appeals erred when it refused to allow petitioners to replead their claims under a premises defect theory because it determined the City had no duty to enforce its own safety procedures. Whether a duty exists is a question of law for the court. Texas Home Mgmt., Inc. v. Peavy, 89 S.W.3d 30, 33 (Tex. 2002).... | Party Submissions | 5.734128 | 5.871601 | 6.055641 |
Respondents acknowledge that the result in Kemp turned mainly on the fact that the tenant lacked the legitimate “right of possession” to the property necessary to maintain a constructive-eviction claim. (Resp. 34, citing Kemp, 2020 WL 205313, at *4) Respondents claim that they too challenged Westwood’s right of possess... | Party Submissions | 6.550249 | 6.62817 | 7.05107 |
More still, in performing its de novo review of the Wright ’s expert reports, the Seventh Court ignored the providers’ specific objections (other than to note that there were many), failed to distinguish between the providers’ objections, and even raised and sustained objections that the providers themselves had never ... | Party Submissions | 16.312397 | 15.076363 | 17.317362 |
The present case illustrates the point. [Husband’s] pension rights, a valuable asset built up by 24 years of community effort, under the French rule would escape division by the court as a community asset solely because dissolution occurred two years before the vesting date. | Party Submissions | 21.14654 | 29.70079 | 24.893639 |
In Tatum, the parents of a teenager who shot himself after a car accident published a paid obituary in the defendant newspaper stating that their son died as a result of injuries sustained in the crash. Id. at 621-22. The newspaper subsequently published a column that cited the obituary as an example of an undisclosed ... | Party Submissions | 5.175942 | 5.153185 | 5.541698 |
Governmental immunity protects the State’s political subdivisions, including its cities, against suits and legal liability. See Dohlen v. City of San Antonio, 643 S.W.3d 387, 392 (Tex. 2022). The TTCA waives immunity for “personal injury and death so caused by a condition or use of tangible personal or real property” i... | Party Submissions | 3.071334 | 3.923925 | 4.001314 |
This AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”), dated as of November 1, 2023 (the “Effective Date”), is entered into by and between The Dow Chemical Company, a Delaware corporation (“Dow”), and Union Carbide Corporation, a New York corporation and an Affiliate of Dow (“UCC”, and together with Dow, the “Parties” and each, a “Party”)... | Contract | 2.622179 | 2.297785 | 2.867621 |
To amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to require a certain efficiency level for certain distribution transformers, and for other purposes. | Legislation | 5.974749 | 5.584624 | 5.824868 |
To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to require the Secretary of Agriculture to make timely decisions on applications of retail food stores to accept benefits from recipients of supplemental nutrition assistance through on-line transactions, and for other purposes. | Legislation | 4.703341 | 4.338598 | 4.711851 |
Essentially, Osprin asks us to change the wording used by the parties to the guaranty by adding qualifying language to its broad scope, such as: “ any and all obligations of the Guarantor under this Guaranty, except those obligations that are matured, fixed, and non-executory, shall terminate upon the construction and ... | Party Submissions | 7.594883 | 7.85355 | 8.061703 |
Survey, Abstract 1152, and described as partof a 29.14 acre tract inthat certain Warranty Deed dated November 25,1911, from C. | Party Submissions | 13.59903 | 19.076845 | 24.261969 |
The Plan constitutes an unsecured promise by a Participating Employer to pay benefits in the future. Participants in the Plan shall have the status of general unsecured creditors of the Company or the Adopting Employer, as applicable. Each Participating Employer shall be solely responsible for payment of the benefits o... | Contract | 3.148469 | 3.200556 | 3.595902 |
Particularly given the lack of explanation of the significance of these various cases, it is difficult to know exactly what Rafiei wants the Court to take away from them. None of the cases are presented as support for an argument that the Court needs to change Texas law. | Party Submissions | 14.725426 | 17.345015 | 16.804731 |
Appellee/Defendant: Sharon West 7015 Anderson St. Texas City, TX 77591 shangrewe@gmail.com Citation Certified Mail Rejected No Counsel on Record IDENTITY OF PARTIES AND COUNSEL .........................................................ii. | Party Submissions | 24.469915 | 22.481722 | 33.259445 |
Specified Employee Effective Date. Specified Employee Effective Date means the first (1st) day of the fourth month following the Specified Employee Identification Date, or such earlier date as is selected by the Committee. | Contract | 4.966161 | 8.200097 | 6.959206 |
HN2 [ ] Appeals, Appellate Briefs Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(e), (h) requires that a brief state the issues presented for review and contain argument. | Party Submissions | 10.653976 | 14.467677 | 12.854928 |
Subsequent to Zuckerberg, Delaware courts have continued to rule that demand is excused in cases involving self-dealing. E.g., Atallah v. Malone, No. 2021-1116-SG, 2023 WL 4628774, at *5 (Del. Ch. July 19, 2023) (demand futility established by self-dealing alone). The Zuckerberg decision did not change substantive Dela... | Party Submissions | 9.973918 | 10.267992 | 10.516812 |
Simply put, such extreme costs to obtain a threshold ruling are too great for Rafiei to bear. To that end, Rafiei has provided his own affidavit in support of his contention that the delegation provision is unconscionable. Specifically, Rafiei had testified he could not afford to pursue his claims through arbitration a... | Party Submissions | 11.08582 | 11.08438 | 11.474257 |
Clause 11 of the Investment Agreement (Exh. C-010) provides: “The COMPANY undertakes, before commencing the Project, to obtain, in accordance with the applicable legal provisions, the permits, licenses and authorizations that may be necessary for the execution of said Project.” With reference to the above and any other... | Party Submissions | 8.035697 | 6.334037 | 8.110317 |
To amend the Federal Crop Insurance Act to modify eligibility for prevented planting insurance under certain drought conditions, and for other purposes. | Legislation | 6.142331 | 4.60879 | 5.847395 |
This AMENDED AND RESTATED EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”), entered into as of February 27, 2023 by and between OneSpan North America, Inc. (the “Company”), and Matthew Moynahan (“Executive”), amends and restates in its entirety the Executive Employment Agreement effective as of November 29, 2021 (the ... | Contract | 2.742474 | 2.260456 | 2.771254 |
Permission must be stated in the order to be appealed. An order previously issued may be amended to include such permission. The permission must identify the controlling question of law as to which there is a substantial ground for difference of opinion, and must state why an immediate appeal may materially advance the... | Party Submissions | 6.406937 | 8.147169 | 8.084943 |
Section 1. Effective Date and Plan Year. The “Effective Date” of the Plan shall be October 27, 2016. The “Plan Year” shall be the 12-consecutive month period beginning on January 1 and ending on December 31; provided, however, that, the first Plan Year shall be a short Plan Year beginning on the Effective Date and endi... | Contract | 2.947892 | 3.057707 | 3.047834 |
The ground assigned for the motion to dismiss the appeal was a want of jurisdiction in this court to take cognizance of it. | Party Submissions | 7.507087 | 12.77465 | 16.116377 |
Barina also contends the rule does not apply to the Program because nothing in the Program suggests that it contains third-party allegations. As a matter of law and logic, Barina’s argument is meritless: Petitioners are seeking the protection of the third-party-allegation rule for claims made by Ross and Martinez while... | Party Submissions | 9.778417 | 9.890111 | 10.045081 |
When parties delegate the decision of arbitrability to an arbitrator, a court “possesses no power to decide the arbitrability issue.” TotalEnergies E&P USA Inc. v. MP Gulf of Mexico, LLC, 667 S.W.3d 694, 721 n.3 (Tex. 2023) (citing Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc., 139 S. Ct. 524, 529 (2019)). Thus, unl... | Party Submissions | 5.17932 | 5.225805 | 5.57514 |
Furthermore, in the spirit of cooperation, Claimants are willing to limit the scope of this request in the following way: • Production may be limited to documents that are in the possession, custody, or control of USTR (which led the USMCA negotiations); the U.S. State Department (the “State Department”) (which co-lead... | Legal Decisions | 8.178466 | 7.57679 | 8.038894 |
Weatherford argues that the residual four-year statute of limitations did not begin unless and until the TCEQ approved the remediation plan. However, the statute itself indicates that the removal or remedial action itself is the requisite fact that starts the limitations period. Weatherford stated that the costs of the... | Party Submissions | 8.713618 | 8.723266 | 8.864555 |
County, R.L.S. pled guilty to the burglary of a habitation offense and received deferred adjudication community supervision. In 2016, R.L.S. filed his petition for expunction of the Limestone County arrest. | Party Submissions | 7.085328 | 7.894753 | 10.2044 |
The testimony and exhibits at the hearing demonstrate that Respondent was subject to general jurisdiction. Most importantly is Exhibit 7. (RR Vol. 2, Ex. 7, and Appendix, Tab 3). That Exhibit is a public offering on behalf of Integrity Aviation, LLC. (RR Volume 2, page 104) Integrity is a Texas Company. (RR Vol. 2, p. ... | Party Submissions | 10.226949 | 9.436292 | 10.801654 |
Unless and until such time as Shares are issued in settlement of vested RSUs, the Participant shall have no ownership of the Shares allocated to the RSUs and, subject to the provisions of Section 5, shall have no rights as a shareholder with respect to such Shares. Upon settlement, the Company shall cause the Company’s... | Contract | 3.17878 | 3.510084 | 3.425943 |
App. 9, CR 709. decided for a cesarian delivery at 15:15, and that H.W. would been born without neurologic injury if he was delivered atraumatically by 15:45. Id. at 671. | Party Submissions | 20.58702 | 26.810562 | 25.698652 |
Justice Jewell observed that “[t]he initial filing fee for ‘nonmonetary claims’ is under $3,250 under the standard fee schedule; and it is only $2,000 under the “flexible” schedule.” Id. | Party Submissions | 17.753244 | 17.999413 | 18.470642 |
R, M : Claimants failed to demonstrate how the requested documents are relevant to its case and material for the outcome of the proceedings. In particular, Claimants failed to explain how the opinion of the Secretariat for Environmental Protection is relevant to the question of Obnova's alleged property rights or mater... | Legal Decisions | 11.757833 | 10.934832 | 12.008693 |
The TTCA provides a limited waiver of immunity for certain tort claims against governmental entities, including claims for “personal injury and death so caused by a condition or use of tangible personal or real property if the governmental unit would, were it a private person, be liable to the claimant according to Tex... | Party Submissions | 2.701631 | 3.268827 | 3.239777 |
Between the filing of the motion to dismiss and corresponding hearing, Dunn amended her petition to include allegations that ETMC Athens failed to provide a safe place to work and was negligent at the time of the incident. ETMC Athens is a nonsubscriber to workers' compensation. Following the dismissal of Dunn's claims... | Party Submissions | 8.776857 | 8.08195 | 9.709797 |
These documents were contained in hardcopy or electronic files on computers, phones, hard drives and/or USB keys belonging to the Claimant that were seized by the Respondent either during his arrestation or his detention and not returned to the Claimant since then. The requested information is therefore within the poss... | Legal Decisions | 12.094222 | 12.84508 | 12.831432 |
The Diocese claims that Question 2 in the jury charge was erroneous because it did not submit the increased value of the Ranch due to the improvements. The Diocese then argues that because there was no evidence of increased value, a rendition is appropriate. But that’s not correct. | Party Submissions | 13.140504 | 16.766594 | 15.180012 |
During the due diligence period, the buyer has the right to receive information from the seller to determine the suitability of the property. | Party Submissions | 6.080436 | 6.517295 | 7.416418 |
Although the Property Tax Code allows a property owner to file an administrative protest to the appraisal review board of certain actions, such as the inclusion of the owner’s property in the appraisal records pursuant to Chapter 41 or other corrections under § 25.25, Oncor is prohibited from pursuing any such remedy w... | Party Submissions | 4.60261 | 4.912537 | 4.538584 |
Finally, Barina emphasizes Thrash’s unmentioned dementia diagnosis, see Resp. Br. at 2, 4, 7, 10, as if that omission would positively affect a viewer’s perception of her actions. It would not. The medical exam, which reported moderate dementia, noted no deficit in long-term memory; basic recognition, comprehension, or... | Party Submissions | 7.941135 | 8.547878 | 8.97648 |
Therefore, contrary to the Gaonos' argument that the statutory process was complete upon the appeals panel issuing its decision, the Act expressly provides the decision, though binding, is not final during the pending judicial review. Id. § 410.205(b). | Party Submissions | 15.905769 | 22.23598 | 20.975903 |
Liberty argues that the Contract provides for only one service. Liberty’s Response at 23. This ignores the construction of the Contract. The Contract details multiple obligations and prohibitions (for both parties) in its terms. Liberty is not obligated to provide treatment for certain industrial waste (Section 3.3); L... | Party Submissions | 9.618516 | 8.619372 | 10.253735 |
Similarly, this Court has repeatedly stated that if a promissory note contains an optional acceleration clause, limitations does not automatically start to run upon default, and that an action accrues “only when the holder actually exercises its option to accelerate” the entire note. Holy Cross Church of God in Christ ... | Party Submissions | 6.533464 | 6.818201 | 6.783667 |
These documents were co ntained in hardcopy or electronic files on computers, phones, hard drives and/or USB keys belonging to the Claimant that were seized by the Respondent either during his arrestation or his detention and not returned to the Claimant since then. The requested information is therefore within the pos... | Legal Decisions | 13.390581 | 13.452183 | 14.155488 |
This conclusion is underscored by the fact that, at oral argument, they were unable to identify any material difference in a subsequent trial with yet another small group of plaintiffs. | Party Submissions | 17.399033 | 22.567863 | 25.39995 |
Just as the record does not support MVP’s assertion that RLB’s “sole objection to the forum-selection clause’s enforcement” was that the MCC’s choices of Oklahoma forum and law could be voided under Section 272.001, the record also does not support that “the trial court apparently based its ruling on that objection.” M... | Party Submissions | 8.56195 | 9.602786 | 9.072819 |
The issue of compensation in situations involving war or other conflicts 266. Article X of Annex III of the Treaty, relied upon by Respondent, sets forth: COMPENSATION FOR LOSSES Investors of one Party whose Investments in the territory of the other Party suffer losses owing to war or other armed conflict, revolution, ... | Legal Decisions | 5.461285 | 4.956156 | 5.22329 |
The principle which lies at the foundation of the whole system of community property is, that whatever is acquired by the joint efforts of the husband and wife, shall be their community property. It would be an unnecessary consumption of time, to quote authorities for this proposition. | Party Submissions | 7.978719 | 9.370576 | 8.929934 |
Perhaps more importantly, however, none of the evidence Respondents cite played any part in the court of appeals’ decision. The court refused to consider it. Nor did the court rely on any “Rule 11 agreement” memorialized in the agreed judgment (Resp. 21, 28) because it deemed the judgment’s contents themselves unimport... | Party Submissions | 12.352074 | 11.817583 | 12.544428 |
Second, in considering a sufficiency review of the evidence, the court of appeals exceeds the proper scope of review when it disregards circumstantial evidence as to a question of characterization of marital assets and only considers the absence of direct evidence to determine a question of legal versus factual suffici... | Party Submissions | 15.02282 | 15.276129 | 18.596704 |
Petitioner (Oncor) presents a distorted and somewhat imaginative Statement of Facts that inaccurately characterizes the core issues as attributable to mistakes made by Wilbarger CAD or its appraisers. What actually happened is Oncor, or its predecessor Sharyland, rendered what it now represents as incorrect figures on ... | Party Submissions | 12.792873 | 13.150818 | 12.831823 |
The snow crab eats and lives on the bottom all its life except in the larval phase where the larvae live in the upper water masses up to several months before they settle. | Legal Decisions | 14.677967 | 15.84861 | 16.14385 |
I hereby certify that on October 23, 2023 a true and correct copy of the foregoing Petit ioners’ Oral Argument Exhibits has been electronically filed and served on all counsel below. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(c)(1), 9.5(b)(1). | Party Submissions | 7.007726 | 8.993308 | 9.614192 |
I, a resident of (state, or country if other than U.S.), accept and agree to the terms of the Restricted Stock Unit Award described in this Agreement and in the Plan, acknowledge receipt of a copy of this Agreement, the Plan and the applicable Plan Summary, and acknowledge that I have read them carefully and that I ful... | Contract | 5.644772 | 6.507969 | 6.707486 |
HN5 [ ] Equitable estoppel may be asserted to bar a defendant from raising a particular defense. Joe v. Two Thirty Nine Joint Venture, 145 S.W.3d 150, 156 n. 1 (Tex. 2004). To establish equitable estoppel, a party must prove (1) a false representation or concealment of material facts, (2) made with knowledge, actual or... | Party Submissions | 3.537114 | 4.063348 | 3.948682 |
Because, under the termination clause, all of Backes ’s obligations under the guaranty terminated upon the completion of the historic tax credit rehabilitation of the Texaco building, and because the trial court entered an unchallenged fact-finding establishing when the completion occurred that was supported by evidenc... | Party Submissions | 13.742709 | 15.895283 | 16.635586 |
Section 4.10. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, together with the Stockholders Agreement (as defined below), embodies the complete agreement and understanding between the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. Except as provided below, this Agreement supersedes and preempts any prior understandings, agreeme... | Contract | 2.956896 | 2.614536 | 3.040936 |
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate certain fuel excise taxes and impose a tax on greenhouse gas emissions to provide revenue for maintaining and building American infrastructure, and for other purposes. | Legislation | 6.129734 | 5.261197 | 5.828108 |
Signature of Presiding Juror Printed Name of Presiding Juror __ Our verdict is not unanimous. Eleven of us have agreed to each and every answer and have signed the certificate below. | Party Submissions | 15.5485 | 23.37455 | 23.44038 |
Id. (internal citations omitted). Essentially, the Court clarified that, unlike cases in which an employer is a subscriber to workers' compensation, an employee must prove negligence against a nonsubscribing employer. | Party Submissions | 8.016025 | 11.019912 | 10.651106 |
Part of Obnova’s premises at Dunavska 23 is located on a part of former land plot N o. 39/1. According to excerpts from the Real Estate Cadaster, this land plot was registered as privately owned by Selfnest doo.168 Claimants consider that this registration is incorrect and Obnova has the right of use over the respectiv... | Legal Decisions | 16.889423 | 18.10891 | 17.97844 |
As Oncor noted in its initial brief, the agreement at issue in Houston Cement was materially different from the one at issue in this case. In Houston Cement, the agreement included “itemized descriptions of the initial and final appraised values of several types of property, including inventory .” Houston Cement, 2013 ... | Party Submissions | 9.024481 | 8.854517 | 9.506242 |
In sum, Douglas failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact on her equitable estoppel or quasi-estoppel theories. Accordingly, we overrule her sole issue and affirm the summary judgment in favor of Moody. | Party Submissions | 6.157743 | 9.125145 | 9.190209 |
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE This document complies with the form requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.4 and contains 2,175 words (except for those items excluded by Rule 9.4(h)(1)). /s/ Deborah Race Deborah Race CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On October 20, 2023, I electronically filed this Motion for Rehearing fr... | Party Submissions | 4.61774 | 6.0759 | 6.96451 |
This Court has recognized that differential diagnosis enjoys widespread acceptance as a valid diagnostic technique in the medical community and that it has been subjected to use, peer review, and testing. Transcon. Ins. Co. v. Crump, 330 S.W.3d 211, 216 (Tex. 2010). And at least one appellate court has held that reason... | Party Submissions | 7.650584 | 7.168097 | 8.096573 |
But they also claim his “extensive teaching and supervisory experience, as detailed in his report, shows that he has the knowledge and experience necessary to opine on the cause of diverse neonatal injuries....” ( Id. ). To support that claim, the Walkers cite to one page of Dr. Tappan’s report in which he describes hi... | Party Submissions | 13.546588 | 11.85679 | 16.075064 |
Rafiei moves on to Gandee v. LDL Freedom Enterprises, Inc., 293 P.3d 1197 (Wash. 2013). Rafiei offers Gandee as an example of a plaintiff that successfully demonstrated that an arbitration provision was unconscionably expensive. But the evidence in Gandee is much more persuasive than the evidence proffered by Rafiei. F... | Party Submissions | 6.924017 | 6.993969 | 7.377063 |
Subject matter jurisdiction is essential to a court’s authority to decide a case. In re Abbott, 601 S.W.3d 802, 807 (Tex. 2020) (original proceeding) (per curiam) (citing Tex. Ass’n of Bus. v. Tex. Air Control Bd., 852 S.W.2d 440, 443 (Tex. 1993)). Whether a trial court has subject matter jurisdiction is a question of ... | Party Submissions | 2.252419 | 2.260012 | 2.471483 |
Petitioners were limited to claiming a latent, physical defect, which the facts did not support. Id. at *7. But the court also struggled with what duties the City owed to Catiana. Id. Unable to fully answer these questions, the court held whatever duties may exist, the City had no duty to protect patrons from the natur... | Party Submissions | 8.803297 | 8.636065 | 9.123566 |
Taken that broadly, the mandatory-general-stay rule the Court adopts today would upend federal litigation as we know it. Aware that any interlocutory appeal on a dispositive issue grinds the plaintiff's case to a halt, defendants would presumably pursue that tactic at every opportunity. This would occur, for example, i... | Party Submissions | 7.826606 | 7.939748 | 8.098838 |
Instead of proposing modifications that could allow EOG’s wells to recover riverbed minerals, Ammonite demanded compulsory pooling even though the riverbed minerals would not be recovered by EOG’s wells. That was its position at the offer stage, 5.SCR.258, and in its MIPA application, e.g., 1.SCR.218-19, so that is the... | Party Submissions | 8.669555 | 8.607518 | 9.300607 |
None of these documents were provided by the Respondent to the Claimant at the time of the seizure of the assets or thereafter. The requested information is internal governmental documentation, which Qatar is in a position to access without undue burden. | Legal Decisions | 13.483333 | 15.683864 | 14.543471 |
For that matter, “virtually every right that could be enforced appropriately by pretrial dismissal might loosely be described as conferring a ‘right not to stand trial.’ ” Digital Equipment Corp. v. Desktop Direct, Inc., 511 U.S. 863, 873, 114 S.Ct. 1992, 128 L.Ed.2d 842 (1994). “Such motions can be made in virtually e... | Party Submissions | 6.073421 | 5.306412 | 6.337313 |
Husband did present was not “of asubstantive and probative character to support the-decision.” S'ee In reMarriage ofC:.A.S., 405 S.W.3d 373, 383 (Tex. App—Dallas 2013, no pet). | Party Submissions | 15.722351 | 15.761842 | 18.307926 |
HN4 [ ] "An agency has exclusive jurisdiction [over a claim] when a statutory scheme indicates the Legislature intended the statutory process to be the exclusive means of remedying the problem to which the statute is addressed." Tyler Asphalt, 107 S.W.3d at 838 (citing Subaru of Am., Inc. v. David McDavid Nissan, Inc.,... | Party Submissions | 4.388565 | 4.822601 | 4.89967 |
First, Walker fails at the threshold. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.3(e) directs mandamus applicants to seek relief from the appropriate court of appeals, if available, and only to seek relief initially in this Court if “compelling reasons” require it. As Walker concedes (at 3–4), the Election Code vests concurr... | Party Submissions | 7.395428 | 8.593761 | 7.85531 |
Fourth , Respondents are wrong to downplay the legal errors below by claiming there is no evidence of a “require[ment]” under the correct standard. | Party Submissions | 47.990173 | 36.966667 | 53.863293 |
IDENTITY OF PARTIES AND COUNSEL......................................................i Wilbarger CAD disagrees with Oncor’s phrasing of the issues. The issues are more properly phrased: 1. May a property owner seek to change the appraised value of its property under TEX. TAX CODE § 25.25 after entering a binding and fi... | Party Submissions | 5.560766 | 6.058888 | 5.747854 |
Q. Let me just clarify. You’re not saying that she was within the course and scope of her employment at the time of her injury, are you? | Party Submissions | 6.975568 | 9.062058 | 11.345321 |
Furthermore, the basis of the Trial Court’s granting of the Plea to the Jurisdiction and the Court of Appeals’ opinion affirming that decision was jurisdiction-based, and as a result, this Court need not entertain any substantive law analysis when Weatherford failed to meet its threshold burden to connect Midland to th... | Party Submissions | 11.650957 | 11.99841 | 12.826648 |
The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall automatically expire on the one (1) year anniversary of the Effective Date (the “Term”). No Party shall have any obligation under this Agreement after the expiration of the Term (other than in respect of any obligations incurred during the Term, ... | Contract | 3.278374 | 2.939273 | 3.469294 |
Gal ovelho’s equal protection claim alleged that the Emergency Orders “determin[ed] which people, businesses, services, and groups are permitted to operate their business, and who must shut down their business on the whim of Government ,” and identified no “discernable, legitimate, criteria that has any rational relati... | Party Submissions | 10.719437 | 11.67189 | 11.555003 |
To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the organization of the Office of Survivors Assistance of the Department of Veterans Affairs. | Legislation | 3.967735 | 3.403801 | 3.826381 |
Little v. Auto Stiegler, Inc., 63 P.3d 979, 991 (Cal. 2003), requires that arbitration costs in employment cases must be paid by the employer in all instances. See Response at 14. As mentioned above, that position has been rejected by this Court in Poly-American. The Little opinion has been questioned by a California f... | Party Submissions | 7.391146 | 7.941522 | 8.923232 |
Samson Got the Cases Severed by Promising They Would Be Treated Equally In November 2006, the Bordages and Hooks owners were in the same lawsuit against Samson. Their nine nearly identical leases were collectively called “Tract 4/14 Leases” based on the numbers Samson had assigned the three tracts they covered. 1CR229-... | Party Submissions | 13.394368 | 12.473606 | 14.318774 |
In the further alternative, the Court should affirm the remand of the case for a new trial for the reasons stated by the court of appeals or for the further reasons not addressed by that court, discussed above. As HSMiller points out, the case has been tried 43 twice already, as the unfortunate consequence of the BNC S... | Party Submissions | 20.938988 | 19.575764 | 22.811531 |
See Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 408.221(a), (b). Counsel: For APPELLANT: Stuart F. Lewis, Law Office of Stuart F. Lewis, Bryan, TX. For APPELLEE: Dwaine Boydstun, Harris & Harris, Austin, TX. | Party Submissions | 7.277199 | 8.608413 | 9.35192 |
This is a personal injury case that necessarily raises the initial question of Bay's standing to raise the exclusive remedy affirmative defense. In order to do so, Bay must first prove it complied with the statutorily required conditions set forth in the Texas Labor Code § 406.123, the statute that governs the type of ... | Party Submissions | 11.029882 | 10.413596 | 11.931137 |
B. SMITH COUNTY COURT HAS EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION. [16] We agree with Tyler that the Smith County court has exclusive jurisdiction because determination of the course and scope issue is committed to the statutory workers' compensation process, judicial review is a part of that process, and judicial review must occur in ... | Party Submissions | 5.749735 | 5.608153 | 6.367701 |
On Petition for Review from the Eleventh Court of Appeals, Eastland Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 55.3 and in response to this Court’s request, the City of Midland respectfully submits its response brief on the merits. | Party Submissions | 6.962801 | 6.721995 | 6.934588 |
Justice Huddle posed the following hypothetical: if Bay had gone “through each of these injuries described in the final judgment, and for this particular one said, ‘We allocate $100,000 of the 1.9 to this injury,’ would that be sufficient to carry their burden, and you would have a $100,000 settlement credit? Or do you... | Party Submissions | 17.362022 | 19.596148 | 19.68709 |
Arbitration Rule 29(4)(i) 23.1. Recordings shall be made of all hearings and sessions. The recordings shall be provided to the Parties and the Tribunal Members. | Legal Decisions | 12.883772 | 13.804397 | 14.599623 |
Serbia argues in the Counter-Memorial that Claimants did not prove that Obnova built the buildings presently existing at its premises and argue that all Obnova’s buildings at Dunavska 17 -19 had been built bef ore the creation of Obnova’s predecessor Otpad.46 The requested documents are relevant and material to assess ... | Legal Decisions | 12.996551 | 14.173433 | 13.771451 |
The instruction to exclude only the later-in-time signature, Tex. Elec. Code §141.066(c), compounds the constitutional problems. If anything, a duplicative signature shows that the individual changed his mind and supports the second candidate more. The State’s instruction to treat differently two candidates who receive... | Party Submissions | 21.259655 | 28.600233 | 18.761078 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.