words stringlengths 0 4.03k | end_time float64 0.46 2.95k | speaker stringclasses 4 values | start_time float64 0 2.93k | session_id stringclasses 100 values |
|---|---|---|---|---|
a | 449.71 | speaker4 | 449.6 | session_d486867c |
good | 449.87 | speaker1 | 449.72 | session_d486867c |
shape it's | 452.39 | speaker3 | 449.88 | session_d486867c |
quite similar to what it was before though o | 454.87 | speaker1 | 452.4 | session_d486867c |
this stage of the evaluation is really for us as a team to evaluate if we have now got a product specification and prototype design that meets the the criteria that we got from our market research so this is the first stage of the evaluation now the collection of the criteria as we saw in our previous meeting was based on the user requirements and trends found in the marketing reports and marketing strategy of our company so it's what we've discussed in the last meeting are we actually meeting those trends and requirements now the findings that we came up with just a recap are here the criteria that we want in this remote control are a fancy look and feel technological innovation it should be easy to use it should incorporate current fashion trends and those are the two main ones there were a spongy texture and the fruit and vegetable strong design colors the design should minimize rsi and be easy to locate and we were still slightly ambivalent as to whether to use voice recognition there that that did seem to be the favoriteored strategy but there was also on the sideline the thought of maybe having a beeper function okay so we can come back to that slide if you don't have a note of those i'll just show you how we're going to evaluate our own feedback to this of what we have so far we're going to use a seven point scale where one is true and seven is false we'll look at each of those criteria that i've just mentioned i'll call that slide back up and i will just do a preliminary rating of all those criteria on the whiteboard here does that seem clear any questions there | 551.12 | speaker2 | 455.96 | session_d486867c |
so we're | 552.63 | speaker3 | 552.32 | session_d486867c |
going | 552.75 | speaker1 | 552.64 | session_d486867c |
to look at these | 553.39 | speaker2 | 552.76 | session_d486867c |
is it everybody is going to evalate it or just | 555.43 | speaker3 | 553.4 | session_d486867c |
yes we're going to come to we'll discuss each one and we'll come to a consensus rating between one and seven okay one is true seven is false right | 567.72 | speaker2 | 555.44 | session_d486867c |
so | 569.31 | speaker1 | 569.24 | session_d486867c |
i won't write all of that out again it will just be criteria one two three four five six or abc def to confuse it with the number rating b cdf | 578.92 | speaker2 | 569.32 | session_d486867c |
this | 580.83 | speaker1 | 580.68 | session_d486867c |
is where i realize how tiny i actually am just right sley | 585.34 | speaker2 | 580.84 | session_d486867c |
criteria | 587 | speaker1 | 586.4 | session_d486867c |
and rating actually it might be an idea if we each did give our own individual rating and we could take an average at the end how about that so you okay | 601.89 | speaker2 | 591 | session_d486867c |
so | 602.79 | speaker1 | 602.68 | session_d486867c |
i'll just separate the ratings by obliques and if we go one two three four we know who's here | 608.12 | speaker2 | 602.8 | session_d486867c |
okay | 616.58 | speaker1 | 616.12 | session_d486867c |
criteria | 618.28 | speaker2 | 617.68 | session_d486867c |
a | 619.56 | speaker1 | 618.96 | session_d486867c |
the | 619.83 | speaker2 | 619.64 | session_d486867c |
fancy | 620.27 | speaker1 | 619.84 | session_d486867c |
look and feel how do we feel about this prototype model relating to fancy it is a fancy look and feel one is true seven is false my own rating for that would be a two one is true and seven is false | 633.98 | speaker2 | 620.28 | session_d486867c |
i | 637.15 | speaker4 | 637 | session_d486867c |
would agree | 637.63 | speaker1 | 637.16 | session_d486867c |
yeah yeah i'd probably put it two yeah two or three no three three okay | 647.17 | speaker4 | 638.64 | session_d486867c |
two oh | 653.35 | speaker1 | 650.28 | session_d486867c |
two | 653.55 | speaker2 | 653.36 | session_d486867c |
four a | 654.27 | speaker1 | 653.56 | session_d486867c |
four | 654.88 | speaker3 | 654.28 | session_d486867c |
okay | 655.35 | speaker1 | 654.92 | session_d486867c |
adding those up we've got six and a five eleven divided by four is what two and three quarters is three | 663.78 | speaker2 | 655.96 | session_d486867c |
two and | 665.67 | speaker1 | 665.4 | session_d486867c |
three quarters | 666.26 | speaker2 | 665.68 | session_d486867c |
i think you yeah okay | 669.71 | speaker1 | 667.48 | session_d486867c |
two | 672.03 | speaker3 | 671.84 | session_d486867c |
point seven five there we go okay criteria b criteria on b technologically innovative i would give that a three | 683.21 | speaker2 | 672.04 | session_d486867c |
i'd | 686.59 | speaker1 | 686.36 | session_d486867c |
give it a one | 687.37 | speaker4 | 686.6 | session_d486867c |
not that you're biased | 689.92 | speaker2 | 688.84 | session_d486867c |
no no not at all | 692.03 | speaker4 | 690.12 | session_d486867c |
the designer | 692.7 | speaker2 | 692.04 | session_d486867c |
a two | 696.45 | speaker1 | 695.96 | session_d486867c |
oh sorry i i got it wrong the first one rating i'm sorry can you just make it two | 704.12 | speaker3 | 698.8 | session_d486867c |
i | 706.67 | speaker2 | 706.56 | session_d486867c |
just thought | 707.44 | speaker3 | 706.68 | session_d486867c |
you wating to be a two | 708.5 | speaker2 | 707.52 | session_d486867c |
an a | 709.69 | speaker3 | 709.08 | session_d486867c |
is that what you're saying yep | 711.55 | speaker2 | 710.28 | session_d486867c |
i just got it | 712.22 | speaker3 | 711.56 | session_d486867c |
so i'll work out the average for that again at the end it's a very slightly altered okay and i'm just waiting for your two point | 721.99 | speaker2 | 714.88 | session_d486867c |
five for that one two point | 723.39 | speaker1 | 722 | session_d486867c |
five okay losing one decimal | 728.84 | speaker2 | 723.4 | session_d486867c |
seven is | 730.72 | speaker3 | 729.84 | session_d486867c |
so | 731.23 | speaker1 | 731.08 | session_d486867c |
you're ritating for this one two okay | 734.05 | speaker2 | 731.24 | session_d486867c |
so | 736.11 | speaker1 | 735.84 | session_d486867c |
that is eight that brings it down to two and simple yeah | 739.7 | speaker2 | 736.12 | session_d486867c |
okay | 741.78 | speaker1 | 741.64 | session_d486867c |
ease of use easy to use based on what you've said there i would say a one true | 749.51 | speaker2 | 742.84 | session_d486867c |
two two | 754.06 | speaker4 | 753.08 | session_d486867c |
i would say a two a two two two i should have said a two to make the arithmetic | 768.04 | speaker1 | 758.48 | session_d486867c |
we'll just put almost two because i'm not gonna get into silly decimal places okay okay we if we want to really bring it down we can do later | 778.1 | speaker2 | 770.68 | session_d486867c |
now we | 781.31 | speaker1 | 781 | session_d486867c |
are looking at it incorporates current fashion trends now that's particularly in relation to our market research findings about the spongy texture to the exterior and the fruit and vegetable design colors yeah right so i'm just thinking before i give it my wriating you were limited in the use of materials for your prototype here yeah is this actually going to be the colors that you use | 804.03 | speaker2 | 781.32 | session_d486867c |
no | 804.23 | speaker1 | 804.04 | session_d486867c |
the the base color was | 806.16 | speaker4 | 804.24 | session_d486867c |
white | 806.79 | speaker3 | 806.4 | session_d486867c |
with | 807.15 | speaker1 | 806.8 | session_d486867c |
white light or sort of light blue but the changeable facecis would allow you to get any basically any one of a number of colors that's full customer fruit | 820.4 | speaker4 | 807.16 | session_d486867c |
and | 820.47 | speaker1 | 820.4 | session_d486867c |
veg colors and that's what we're intending to do | 822.63 | speaker2 | 820.48 | session_d486867c |
yeah yeah okay | 823.92 | speaker4 | 822.64 | session_d486867c |
and the spongey feel is no problem with that | 825.74 | speaker2 | 823.96 | session_d486867c |
no no that' that's the the spongey feel would be because the rubber that you put aroundund it okay otherwise it's just sort of hard plastic | 834.96 | speaker4 | 826.04 | session_d486867c |
in that case it's got to be a one for me | 836.79 | speaker2 | 835 | session_d486867c |
yeah | 838.15 | speaker1 | 837.96 | session_d486867c |
i'll give it a one as well yeah | 839.62 | speaker4 | 838.16 | session_d486867c |
everybody | 841.07 | speaker1 | 840.64 | session_d486867c |
okay one | 843.96 | speaker2 | 841.08 | session_d486867c |
that | 844.79 | speaker1 | 844.6 | session_d486867c |
part | 845.03 | speaker3 | 844.8 | session_d486867c |
was nice and easy yeah okay uhhh moving on to does the design minimize repetitive strain injury i don't think we've really touched on that a we've discussed it we haven't really come up with anything that we felt could feasibly reduce that we've talked about pointers but the very use of a remote control if you're someone who's zapping who's sitting on we found so many people did how do you minimize that in such a small device well the type of button that we're going to use in the bottom half | 873.84 | speaker2 | 845.04 | session_d486867c |
the material minimizes our sence meant to maybe because it's with the size that we've got it's quite small but with the amount of stuff we're putting on it isn't that much so maybe because there's more space it's not kind of moving around trying to hit accurately the buttons in between right it's quite obvious just big buttons right | 898.73 | speaker1 | 874.72 | session_d486867c |
i think i'm gonna have to be neutral on that and give it a four | 902.79 | speaker2 | 899.72 | session_d486867c |
yeah | 905.79 | speaker1 | 905.6 | session_d486867c |
id i'd i'd go for five actually five | 909.36 | speaker4 | 905.8 | session_d486867c |
four | 912.03 | speaker2 | 911.52 | session_d486867c |
four and four four okay | 914.54 | speaker1 | 912.04 | session_d486867c |
twenty one | 918.84 | speaker2 | 917.72 | session_d486867c |
twenty one so that's four point two | 921.27 | speaker1 | 918.96 | session_d486867c |
five | 921.73 | speaker2 | 921.28 | session_d486867c |
and | 926.15 | speaker1 | 925.68 | session_d486867c |
finally last but not least easy to locate and we talked about voice recognition we talked about a beeper we really have the designers come to any | 933.85 | speaker2 | 926.16 | session_d486867c |
yeah was it was a voice | 936.79 | speaker4 | 934.56 | session_d486867c |
recogni | 937.35 | speaker3 | 936.8 | session_d486867c |
it the | 937.83 | speaker2 | 937.36 | session_d486867c |
voice recognition | 938.72 | speaker4 | 937.84 | session_d486867c |
yeah | 939.22 | speaker1 | 939.04 | session_d486867c |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.