words
stringlengths
0
4.03k
end_time
float64
0.46
2.95k
speaker
stringclasses
4 values
start_time
float64
0
2.93k
session_id
stringclasses
100 values
a
449.71
speaker4
449.6
session_d486867c
good
449.87
speaker1
449.72
session_d486867c
shape it's
452.39
speaker3
449.88
session_d486867c
quite similar to what it was before though o
454.87
speaker1
452.4
session_d486867c
this stage of the evaluation is really for us as a team to evaluate if we have now got a product specification and prototype design that meets the the criteria that we got from our market research so this is the first stage of the evaluation now the collection of the criteria as we saw in our previous meeting was based on the user requirements and trends found in the marketing reports and marketing strategy of our company so it's what we've discussed in the last meeting are we actually meeting those trends and requirements now the findings that we came up with just a recap are here the criteria that we want in this remote control are a fancy look and feel technological innovation it should be easy to use it should incorporate current fashion trends and those are the two main ones there were a spongy texture and the fruit and vegetable strong design colors the design should minimize rsi and be easy to locate and we were still slightly ambivalent as to whether to use voice recognition there that that did seem to be the favoriteored strategy but there was also on the sideline the thought of maybe having a beeper function okay so we can come back to that slide if you don't have a note of those i'll just show you how we're going to evaluate our own feedback to this of what we have so far we're going to use a seven point scale where one is true and seven is false we'll look at each of those criteria that i've just mentioned i'll call that slide back up and i will just do a preliminary rating of all those criteria on the whiteboard here does that seem clear any questions there
551.12
speaker2
455.96
session_d486867c
so we're
552.63
speaker3
552.32
session_d486867c
going
552.75
speaker1
552.64
session_d486867c
to look at these
553.39
speaker2
552.76
session_d486867c
is it everybody is going to evalate it or just
555.43
speaker3
553.4
session_d486867c
yes we're going to come to we'll discuss each one and we'll come to a consensus rating between one and seven okay one is true seven is false right
567.72
speaker2
555.44
session_d486867c
so
569.31
speaker1
569.24
session_d486867c
i won't write all of that out again it will just be criteria one two three four five six or abc def to confuse it with the number rating b cdf
578.92
speaker2
569.32
session_d486867c
this
580.83
speaker1
580.68
session_d486867c
is where i realize how tiny i actually am just right sley
585.34
speaker2
580.84
session_d486867c
criteria
587
speaker1
586.4
session_d486867c
and rating actually it might be an idea if we each did give our own individual rating and we could take an average at the end how about that so you okay
601.89
speaker2
591
session_d486867c
so
602.79
speaker1
602.68
session_d486867c
i'll just separate the ratings by obliques and if we go one two three four we know who's here
608.12
speaker2
602.8
session_d486867c
okay
616.58
speaker1
616.12
session_d486867c
criteria
618.28
speaker2
617.68
session_d486867c
a
619.56
speaker1
618.96
session_d486867c
the
619.83
speaker2
619.64
session_d486867c
fancy
620.27
speaker1
619.84
session_d486867c
look and feel how do we feel about this prototype model relating to fancy it is a fancy look and feel one is true seven is false my own rating for that would be a two one is true and seven is false
633.98
speaker2
620.28
session_d486867c
i
637.15
speaker4
637
session_d486867c
would agree
637.63
speaker1
637.16
session_d486867c
yeah yeah i'd probably put it two yeah two or three no three three okay
647.17
speaker4
638.64
session_d486867c
two oh
653.35
speaker1
650.28
session_d486867c
two
653.55
speaker2
653.36
session_d486867c
four a
654.27
speaker1
653.56
session_d486867c
four
654.88
speaker3
654.28
session_d486867c
okay
655.35
speaker1
654.92
session_d486867c
adding those up we've got six and a five eleven divided by four is what two and three quarters is three
663.78
speaker2
655.96
session_d486867c
two and
665.67
speaker1
665.4
session_d486867c
three quarters
666.26
speaker2
665.68
session_d486867c
i think you yeah okay
669.71
speaker1
667.48
session_d486867c
two
672.03
speaker3
671.84
session_d486867c
point seven five there we go okay criteria b criteria on b technologically innovative i would give that a three
683.21
speaker2
672.04
session_d486867c
i'd
686.59
speaker1
686.36
session_d486867c
give it a one
687.37
speaker4
686.6
session_d486867c
not that you're biased
689.92
speaker2
688.84
session_d486867c
no no not at all
692.03
speaker4
690.12
session_d486867c
the designer
692.7
speaker2
692.04
session_d486867c
a two
696.45
speaker1
695.96
session_d486867c
oh sorry i i got it wrong the first one rating i'm sorry can you just make it two
704.12
speaker3
698.8
session_d486867c
i
706.67
speaker2
706.56
session_d486867c
just thought
707.44
speaker3
706.68
session_d486867c
you wating to be a two
708.5
speaker2
707.52
session_d486867c
an a
709.69
speaker3
709.08
session_d486867c
is that what you're saying yep
711.55
speaker2
710.28
session_d486867c
i just got it
712.22
speaker3
711.56
session_d486867c
so i'll work out the average for that again at the end it's a very slightly altered okay and i'm just waiting for your two point
721.99
speaker2
714.88
session_d486867c
five for that one two point
723.39
speaker1
722
session_d486867c
five okay losing one decimal
728.84
speaker2
723.4
session_d486867c
seven is
730.72
speaker3
729.84
session_d486867c
so
731.23
speaker1
731.08
session_d486867c
you're ritating for this one two okay
734.05
speaker2
731.24
session_d486867c
so
736.11
speaker1
735.84
session_d486867c
that is eight that brings it down to two and simple yeah
739.7
speaker2
736.12
session_d486867c
okay
741.78
speaker1
741.64
session_d486867c
ease of use easy to use based on what you've said there i would say a one true
749.51
speaker2
742.84
session_d486867c
two two
754.06
speaker4
753.08
session_d486867c
i would say a two a two two two i should have said a two to make the arithmetic
768.04
speaker1
758.48
session_d486867c
we'll just put almost two because i'm not gonna get into silly decimal places okay okay we if we want to really bring it down we can do later
778.1
speaker2
770.68
session_d486867c
now we
781.31
speaker1
781
session_d486867c
are looking at it incorporates current fashion trends now that's particularly in relation to our market research findings about the spongy texture to the exterior and the fruit and vegetable design colors yeah right so i'm just thinking before i give it my wriating you were limited in the use of materials for your prototype here yeah is this actually going to be the colors that you use
804.03
speaker2
781.32
session_d486867c
no
804.23
speaker1
804.04
session_d486867c
the the base color was
806.16
speaker4
804.24
session_d486867c
white
806.79
speaker3
806.4
session_d486867c
with
807.15
speaker1
806.8
session_d486867c
white light or sort of light blue but the changeable facecis would allow you to get any basically any one of a number of colors that's full customer fruit
820.4
speaker4
807.16
session_d486867c
and
820.47
speaker1
820.4
session_d486867c
veg colors and that's what we're intending to do
822.63
speaker2
820.48
session_d486867c
yeah yeah okay
823.92
speaker4
822.64
session_d486867c
and the spongey feel is no problem with that
825.74
speaker2
823.96
session_d486867c
no no that' that's the the spongey feel would be because the rubber that you put aroundund it okay otherwise it's just sort of hard plastic
834.96
speaker4
826.04
session_d486867c
in that case it's got to be a one for me
836.79
speaker2
835
session_d486867c
yeah
838.15
speaker1
837.96
session_d486867c
i'll give it a one as well yeah
839.62
speaker4
838.16
session_d486867c
everybody
841.07
speaker1
840.64
session_d486867c
okay one
843.96
speaker2
841.08
session_d486867c
that
844.79
speaker1
844.6
session_d486867c
part
845.03
speaker3
844.8
session_d486867c
was nice and easy yeah okay uhhh moving on to does the design minimize repetitive strain injury i don't think we've really touched on that a we've discussed it we haven't really come up with anything that we felt could feasibly reduce that we've talked about pointers but the very use of a remote control if you're someone who's zapping who's sitting on we found so many people did how do you minimize that in such a small device well the type of button that we're going to use in the bottom half
873.84
speaker2
845.04
session_d486867c
the material minimizes our sence meant to maybe because it's with the size that we've got it's quite small but with the amount of stuff we're putting on it isn't that much so maybe because there's more space it's not kind of moving around trying to hit accurately the buttons in between right it's quite obvious just big buttons right
898.73
speaker1
874.72
session_d486867c
i think i'm gonna have to be neutral on that and give it a four
902.79
speaker2
899.72
session_d486867c
yeah
905.79
speaker1
905.6
session_d486867c
id i'd i'd go for five actually five
909.36
speaker4
905.8
session_d486867c
four
912.03
speaker2
911.52
session_d486867c
four and four four okay
914.54
speaker1
912.04
session_d486867c
twenty one
918.84
speaker2
917.72
session_d486867c
twenty one so that's four point two
921.27
speaker1
918.96
session_d486867c
five
921.73
speaker2
921.28
session_d486867c
and
926.15
speaker1
925.68
session_d486867c
finally last but not least easy to locate and we talked about voice recognition we talked about a beeper we really have the designers come to any
933.85
speaker2
926.16
session_d486867c
yeah was it was a voice
936.79
speaker4
934.56
session_d486867c
recogni
937.35
speaker3
936.8
session_d486867c
it the
937.83
speaker2
937.36
session_d486867c
voice recognition
938.72
speaker4
937.84
session_d486867c
yeah
939.22
speaker1
939.04
session_d486867c