words
stringlengths
0
4.03k
end_time
float64
0.46
2.95k
speaker
stringclasses
4 values
start_time
float64
0
2.93k
session_id
stringclasses
100 values
and we're happy with the costs on that that is going to
942.75
speaker2
940.28
session_d486867c
be yeah yeah that cost wise yeah that is feasible
945.4
speaker4
942.76
session_d486867c
that sounds good then i'd go for we can adjust the volume on that just as we could volume on tv
950.3
speaker2
945.48
session_d486867c
i
951.99
speaker1
951.84
session_d486867c
think the
952.91
speaker4
952
session_d486867c
other room or tvs in different rooms
955.2
speaker2
952.92
session_d486867c
i
956.27
speaker1
956.08
session_d486867c
think it would probably be a standard a standard it would be a standard it would be quite loud it would be so it would be
963.43
speaker4
956.28
session_d486867c
bu if you didn't
964.43
speaker2
963.44
session_d486867c
hear it in the room you were standing in then you realized it wasn't in that room that room
968.5
speaker1
964.44
session_d486867c
logical that's the one for me yeah one one
972.98
speaker2
969
session_d486867c
one
974.28
speaker4
973.68
session_d486867c
and
974.55
speaker1
974.32
session_d486867c
one
974.74
speaker2
974.56
session_d486867c
i
977.83
speaker1
977.68
session_d486867c
do realize that we might be being fairly biased because it is
981.24
speaker4
977.84
session_d486867c
so how
984.87
speaker2
983.04
session_d486867c
do
984.99
speaker1
984.88
session_d486867c
we feel about this we've got our we've got the highest rating of meeting the specifications that is definitely true for two of the six criteria there that is for incorporates current fashion trends and is easy to loc the lowest writing we've got which is really it's not terribly low it's close around neutral is for the minimization of repetitive strain injury do we feel on the basis of these evaluation findings that we can go ahead and now produce this as a prototype and market it or do we have to make further modifications
1,019.32
speaker2
985
session_d486867c
i don't think so i think yeah go ahead meet you yeah yeah so
1,026.6
speaker1
1,021.32
session_d486867c
i think for most of those ratings it's high enough at the upper end of the scale for us to go ahead with that and i really doubt if on the basis of current technology and our current capabilities we could actually do much having a huge big i know
1,040.92
speaker2
1,026.84
session_d486867c
okay
1,042.56
speaker1
1,041.96
session_d486867c
well i hope that's clear to the team is there anything you would like to to ask me about the findings before i sum up so good fine now i'll just leave it there okay thank you
1,055.73
speaker2
1,042.68
session_d486867c
okay i've got finance here now i'm gonna to plug this in so you can all see it that's okay yes
1,072.54
speaker1
1,064.76
session_d486867c
you
1,078.79
speaker2
1,078.68
session_d486867c
want me to unplug that
1,079.96
speaker3
1,078.8
session_d486867c
definitely so
1,096.95
speaker4
1,081.36
session_d486867c
you
1,097.14
speaker1
1,096.96
session_d486867c
right
1,109.25
speaker2
1,108.88
session_d486867c
okay
1,110.8
speaker3
1,110.2
session_d486867c
now i
1,113.07
speaker1
1,112.56
session_d486867c
presume
1,113.68
speaker3
1,113.08
session_d486867c
that the scream will go b that okay we just type numbers into this and we come out with the final value so are we still on for kinetic yeah o see it would have been handy to have this at the beginning it might have influenced our choice right what's happening with the electronics
1,147.64
speaker1
1,115.44
session_d486867c
it was regular chip on print and oh no no no the yeah it's you you've put in three for the number of kinetic cells there should just be one in the top it's the number oh right
1,170.75
speaker4
1,148.32
session_d486867c
okay thanks
1,172.82
speaker1
1,170.76
session_d486867c
yeah and so would it be t yeah just no one reg one chip yeah one of them and one sample sensor in sample speaker okay
1,184.3
speaker4
1,174.6
session_d486867c
yeah and
1,188.23
speaker1
1,187.56
session_d486867c
the double curve nouble
1,191.76
speaker4
1,188.24
session_d486867c
cve
1,192.14
speaker1
1,191.88
session_d486867c
two
1,193.27
speaker4
1,192.88
session_d486867c
because
1,193.47
speaker1
1,193.28
session_d486867c
it's
1,194.08
speaker4
1,193.48
session_d486867c
it has a slightly
1,195.51
speaker1
1,194.8
session_d486867c
flatten bottom so it can sit so what's a single
1,198.07
speaker2
1,195.52
session_d486867c
curve
1,198.55
speaker1
1,198.08
session_d486867c
yeah i'd say i'd say
1,199.88
speaker4
1,198.56
session_d486867c
bottom with one curve
1,200.95
speaker2
1,199.96
session_d486867c
yeah i think i think it's one double one double curved
1,205.8
speaker4
1,200.96
session_d486867c
and
1,207.19
speaker1
1,206.92
session_d486867c
what no because one doub yeah one's double curved and then the other oneize
1,211.6
speaker4
1,207.2
session_d486867c
but it's slightly flattened at the bottom so it doesn't roll over yeah
1,214.18
speaker2
1,211.64
session_d486867c
plastic plastic and
1,219.39
speaker1
1,217.8
session_d486867c
rubber
1,219.83
speaker4
1,219.4
session_d486867c
haven't we yeah
1,220.99
speaker1
1,219.84
session_d486867c
yeah
1,221.22
speaker4
1,221
session_d486867c
plastic one and maybe
1,223.68
speaker3
1,221.8
session_d486867c
no
1,227.55
speaker1
1,227.44
session_d486867c
i think rubber since it's being used just as a casing we can put point five
1,230.87
speaker3
1,227.56
session_d486867c
yeah
1,232.83
speaker4
1,232.28
session_d486867c
do you think yeah because there are i think it allows there point five here we can use that
1,239.07
speaker3
1,232.84
session_d486867c
yeah
1,239.39
speaker4
1,239.08
session_d486867c
okay
1,239.7
speaker1
1,239.4
session_d486867c
what
1,240.75
speaker3
1,240.6
session_d486867c
does it mean if you put
1,241.55
speaker2
1,240.76
session_d486867c
zero point five for that means we are not using a lot of rubber actually we are
1,245.2
speaker3
1,241.56
session_d486867c
like saying we're using
1,246.52
speaker1
1,245.36
session_d486867c
a very low quantity of rubber compared to plastic
1,249.59
speaker3
1,246.76
session_d486867c
see it says case material so
1,254.54
speaker1
1,250.72
session_d486867c
we're
1,255.31
speaker4
1,255.12
session_d486867c
not actually using plastic in the case
1,257.35
speaker1
1,255.32
session_d486867c
no no that's it's an
1,259
speaker4
1,257.36
session_d486867c
it's
1,259.88
speaker1
1,259.28
session_d486867c
so that shouldn't that shouldn't be actually on there because that's not incorporated in the cost of the remote you get
1,267.12
speaker4
1,260.56
session_d486867c
but it is going to be part of the total cost and there's nowhere else we can we can put that in is there there's nowhere else we can code for the the rubber used in the casing
1,274.3
speaker2
1,267.2
session_d486867c
so do we not have to account for it in the cost somewhere there
1,276.76
speaker1
1,274.72
session_d486867c
okay
1,278.99
speaker2
1,278.44
session_d486867c
we'll just put it in as we'll put it in as half okay
1,281.42
speaker1
1,279
session_d486867c
we
1,283.91
speaker2
1,283.8
session_d486867c
should just put it in as one because the plastic is zero anyway yeah okay and we don't step on anyone's toes okay special color do we need that we might do if we go for some of the more exotics and
1,297.58
speaker1
1,283.92
session_d486867c
such like
1,298.99
speaker2
1,298.48
session_d486867c
colors
1,299.38
speaker1
1,299
session_d486867c
interface
1,301.16
speaker2
1,300.56
session_d486867c
push button
1,302.71
speaker1
1,302.04
session_d486867c
yeah
1,304.47
speaker3
1,304.24
session_d486867c
the push buttons one and elsi display one
1,307.93
speaker4
1,304.48
session_d486867c
one
1,310.02
speaker1
1,309.72
session_d486867c
i
1,371.95
speaker3
1,371.84
session_d486867c
think we
1,372.27
speaker4
1,371.96
session_d486867c
could change the battery also instead of going for kinetic how about going for a standard battery
1,375.98
speaker3
1,372.28
session_d486867c
is
1,377.35
speaker1
1,377.24
session_d486867c
that not made any if you click off that square now
1,379.53
speaker2
1,377.36
session_d486867c
does that not made any difference
1,381.24
speaker1
1,380.12
session_d486867c
no
1,383.39
speaker2
1,383.28
session_d486867c
it was seven five it's
1,384.42
speaker1
1,383.4
session_d486867c
changed
1,385.91
speaker2
1,385.4
session_d486867c
is uncurved completely and just actually making the rubber
1,388.99
speaker1
1,386.64
session_d486867c
case the curved thing is not going to make a difference
1,390.9
speaker2
1,389
session_d486867c
on cold flat
1,392.67
speaker1
1,391.64
session_d486867c
it's not made any difference has it
1,396.94
speaker2
1,395.56
session_d486867c
no
1,398.16
speaker1
1,397.56
session_d486867c