archived stringclasses 2
values | author stringlengths 3 20 | author_fullname stringlengths 4 12 ⌀ | body stringlengths 0 22.5k | comment_type stringclasses 1
value | controversiality stringclasses 2
values | created_utc stringlengths 10 10 | edited stringlengths 4 12 | gilded stringclasses 7
values | id stringlengths 1 7 | link_id stringlengths 7 10 | locked stringclasses 2
values | name stringlengths 4 10 ⌀ | parent_id stringlengths 5 10 | permalink stringlengths 41 91 ⌀ | retrieved_on stringlengths 10 10 ⌀ | score stringlengths 1 4 | subreddit_id stringclasses 1
value | subreddit_name_prefixed stringclasses 1
value | subreddit_type stringclasses 1
value | total_awards_received stringclasses 19
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
True | Poltras | null | And it's the one that has been "forgotten" in the last 2 headlines... | null | 0 | 1315842296 | False | 0 | c2jayix | t3_kcwx2 | null | t1_c2jayix | t1_c2jargm | null | 1427590294 | 12 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | b0b | null | Sounds a lot like the initial vision for Java. The cross-compiler aspect is cool, though. | null | 0 | 1315842317 | False | 0 | c2jayls | t3_kcwx2 | null | t1_c2jayls | t3_kcwx2 | null | 1427590295 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | djnattyp | null | C, C++, C#, Java, .NET, Ruby, Python, Apple, Windows...
This isn't just a problem with Google... | null | 0 | 1315842318 | False | 0 | c2jaym0 | t3_kcwx2 | null | t1_c2jaym0 | t1_c2jakar | null | 1427590295 | 16 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | xxpor | null | Real programmers use ed. | null | 0 | 1315842319 | False | 0 | c2jayma | t3_kbz68 | null | t1_c2jayma | t1_c2j427g | null | 1427590295 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | [deleted] | null | [deleted] | null | 0 | 1315842359 | False | 0 | c2jayst | t3_kchtc | null | t1_c2jayst | t3_kchtc | null | 1427590297 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | ergo14 | null | you mean WITH RECURSIVE syntax? you can do that already for a while. | null | 0 | 1315842367 | False | 0 | c2jayu9 | t3_kd0x9 | null | t1_c2jayu9 | t1_c2jau2i | null | 1427590299 | 11 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | merlinm | null | source? | null | 0 | 1315842394 | False | 0 | c2jayyx | t3_kctmn | null | t1_c2jayyx | t1_c2jarvv | null | 1427590301 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | joejance | null | I think C++ is the perfect example of how not to evolve a language, and can serve as a good anti-pattern for those that do want to evolve their language. | null | 0 | 1315842448 | False | 0 | c2jaz8b | t3_kcwx2 | null | t1_c2jaz8b | t1_c2j9zfe | null | 1427590304 | 7 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | damg | null | CTEs were around since PostgreSQL 8.4 (see http://www.postgresql.org/about/featurematrix ), but this release lets you use them with insert/update/delete statements, which is cool. | null | 0 | 1315842451 | False | 0 | c2jaz8n | t3_kd0x9 | null | t1_c2jaz8n | t1_c2jau2i | null | 1427590304 | 4 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | GMTA | null | Pretty awesome, but looking at the source code: doesn't this create a Stream instance for every value you want to access? | null | 0 | 1315842512 | False | 0 | c2jazin | t3_kc4pc | null | t1_c2jazin | t3_kc4pc | null | 1427590310 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | UnoriginalGuy | null | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_engineering#United_States | null | 0 | 1315842542 | False | 0 | c2jaznu | t3_kctmn | null | t1_c2jaznu | t1_c2jayyx | null | 1427590309 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | [deleted] | null | The international community is aware how fucked the US is in that regard. | null | 0 | 1315842571 | False | 0 | c2jazsr | t3_kctmn | null | t1_c2jazsr | t1_c2jarvv | null | 1427590318 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | igouy | null | > there is no defending needing 3 mouse buttons
Yes Oberon the OS not Oberon the programming language - maybe he copied a little too much from Smalltalk ;-)
Then again, as the 2-button mouse scroll-wheel also clicks, the 2-button mouse that shipped as standard with this Dell desktop I'm using behaves as a 3 button mouse. So maybe he was just too far ahead of the times.
| null | 0 | 1315842629 | False | 0 | c2jb018 | t3_kcwx2 | null | t1_c2jb018 | t1_c2jaxmr | null | 1427590313 | 5 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | propool | null | Who hasn't sued OpenJDK these days? | null | 0 | 1315842637 | False | 0 | c2jb028 | t3_kcvv3 | null | t1_c2jb028 | t1_c2japhr | null | 1427590315 | 24 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | mmhrar | null | Seriously, and the whole time he believed he's right until he reads it in an article/book from an author he respects.
If you plan on rewriting a large amount of code, how dense do you have to be to go about doing it w/o completely understanding the entire system?
I can't get passed the fact that he needed to read it from Paul Graham and was completely blind the entire time, even when his peers told him so. What a jerk. | null | 0 | 1315842652 | False | 0 | c2jb04o | t3_kczbt | null | t1_c2jb04o | t1_c2jaf3a | null | 1427590318 | 26 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | cdsmith | null | Google is apparently interested in making a good end-user language. It'll be a better intermediate language than JavaScript (which *has* been used as an intermediate language just because it's the only thing that works in browsers), but not really designed that way.
This doesn't stop anyone else from building an intermediate language and demonstrating that Dart and/or JavaScript could be easily compiled to it on the fly, and proposing that it also be standardized with the intent that browser vendors implement a VM in terms of the intermediate language with on-the-fly compilation for JS and Dart. But that doesn't appear to be Google's aim. | null | 0 | 1315842661 | False | 0 | c2jb061 | t3_kcwx2 | null | t1_c2jb061 | t1_c2j9skc | null | 1427590318 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | rizla7 | null | so youre saying flash, activex, SL and JVM are not exploitable? interesting. what school did you attend? ill remember to put it on my avoidance list. | null | 0 | 1315842675 | False | 0 | c2jb08j | t3_kcwx2 | null | t1_c2jb08j | t1_c2jagwv | null | 1427590320 | -10 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | Poltras | null | It is surprisingly difficult. Many people think it's "easy" to design a language, yet it's one of the most difficult task to do well. | null | 0 | 1315842700 | False | 0 | c2jb0ch | t3_kcwx2 | null | t1_c2jb0ch | t1_c2j9twy | null | 1427590320 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | CrystalShard | null | I like the name "Dash" better. | null | 0 | 1315842705 | False | 0 | c2jb0dc | t3_kcwx2 | null | t1_c2jb0dc | t3_kcwx2 | null | 1427590329 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | grauenwolf | null | It is getting better, but god have mercy on you if something breaks. Fixing FDA requires calling paid support. | null | 0 | 1315842741 | False | 0 | c2jb0jm | t3_kc5di | null | t1_c2jb0jm | t1_c2j9mpm | null | 1427590332 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | [deleted] | null | [deleted] | null | 0 | 1315842833 | False | 0 | c2jb0wp | t3_kctmn | null | t1_c2jb0wp | t1_c2jaznu | null | 1427590329 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | merlinm | null | That section doesn't support what you say at all -- in fact reverse engineering was specifically excepted in the DMCA:
> Sec. 103(f) of the DMCA (17 U.S.C. § 1201 (f)) says that if you legally obtain a program that is protected, you are allowed to reverse-engineer and circumvent the protection to achieve the ability the interoperability of computer programs (i.e., the ability to exchange and make use of information). The section states: | null | 0 | 1315842847 | False | 0 | c2jb0yv | t3_kctmn | null | t1_c2jb0yv | t1_c2jaznu | null | 1427590329 | 4 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | grauenwolf | null | Don't use the SOAP, use the .NET libraries. They are much, much better. | null | 0 | 1315842864 | False | 0 | c2jb14e | t3_kc5di | null | t1_c2jb14e | t1_c2j6ih0 | null | 1427590331 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | mmhrar | null | I get the impression from the post, that in the end, he didn't even throw out his work and instead left everyone else to work w/ his rewrite...
I'd rollback his change in a heartbeat, eight hours of one blow hard's time isn't as bad as trying to fix new bugs in code you own, that was rewritten w/o your permission by someone who didn't understand everything completely. | null | 0 | 1315842881 | False | 0 | c2jb16x | t3_kczbt | null | t1_c2jb16x | t3_kczbt | null | 1427590332 | 19 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | gthank | null | I send them as attachments, because
* It's the polite thing to do, and
* modern mail clients know how to show you a preview if you so choose
I've not tried sending them inline, though I can imagine it doesn't work so well. | null | 0 | 1315842969 | False | 0 | c2jb1kv | t3_kc9ai | null | t1_c2jb1kv | t1_c2jarg1 | null | 1427590334 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | OMouse | null | Guile! | null | 0 | 1315842993 | False | 0 | c2jb1oj | t3_kcwx2 | null | t1_c2jb1oj | t1_c2j9ful | null | 1427590336 | 5 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | rmxz | null | Also
* K-Nearest-Neighbor Indexing:
which is magic for applications who need it. The workaround we used before (a big while loop of "while dist < 0.001 order by dist" ... "while dist < 0.010 order by dist" .... until you finally find a hit) was rather annoying. | null | 0 | 1315843012 | False | 0 | c2jb1ry | t3_kd0x9 | null | t1_c2jb1ry | t1_c2jafo4 | null | 1427590337 | 18 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | borickard | null | See? No one even remembers Buzz enough to comment about it being a failure. Well, except for me. Don't mind me, damnit. | null | 0 | 1315843032 | False | 0 | c2jb1v7 | t3_kcwx2 | null | t1_c2jb1v7 | t1_c2jayfc | null | 1427590337 | 65 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | merlinm | null | yes -- synchronous MM is in theory possible -- but are you really better off vs a single master since everyone has to write out the data anyways? It's not all that difficult to handle master outage in the network level and it greatly complicates the replication architecture to support MM. Postgres's log based replication is definitely 'one way' and would not fit well into any MM model. Trigger based replication (slony) might work, but it's much more complex and less efficient.
edit: also burcardo, as you pointed out. these options though are only interesting if your read/write ratio is well in excess of 10:1 and your data model is relatively simple. | null | 0 | 1315843040 | True | 0 | c2jb1wg | t3_kd0x9 | null | t1_c2jb1wg | t1_c2jalbc | null | 1427590338 | 4 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | schveiguy | null | There is a separate listing for Object Pascal/Delphi at position 12 | null | 0 | 1315843065 | False | 0 | c2jb20e | t3_kaxjq | null | t1_c2jb20e | t1_c2j1jgn | null | 1427590340 | 3 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | rmxz | null | Existed for a long time as an add-on you can install if you need it.
http://bucardo.org/wiki/Bucardo
IMHO the core team's doing a good thing by keeping core lowest-common-denominator; so that groups with special purpose needs can use special-purpose replication solutions (slony, bucardo, pgcluster, pgpool-2 or -3; Londsite) that exactly fit their needs. | null | 0 | 1315843129 | False | 0 | c2jb2af | t3_kd0x9 | null | t1_c2jb2af | t1_c2jalbc | null | 1427590343 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | OMouse | null | Fuck no, GUILE! [It already has Javascript language support](http://wingolog.org/archives/2009/02/22/ecmascript-for-guile) | null | 0 | 1315843165 | False | 0 | c2jb2gc | t3_kcwx2 | null | t1_c2jb2gc | t1_c2j9hyr | null | 1427590346 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | jmelesky | null | Postgresql has had CTE's for a while now (since 8.3 or 8.4), including recursion. What's referenced is the ability to have non-select statements in your CTE's, which i don't think MS-SQL can do. | null | 0 | 1315843173 | True | 0 | c2jb2ht | t3_kd0x9 | null | t1_c2jb2ht | t1_c2jau2i | null | 1427590346 | 8 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | UnoriginalGuy | null | Don't intentionally choice edit, it is lame.
>The reverse engineering of software in the US is generally illegal because most EULA prohibit it, | null | 0 | 1315843180 | False | 0 | c2jb2iv | t3_kctmn | null | t1_c2jb2iv | t1_c2jb0yv | null | 1427590347 | 0 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | Pxtl | null | Am I the only one who thinks Javascript really isn't that bad?
I mean, the browser API/DOM is ugly as hell, but Javascript is freaking *stellar* considering that it was a rush job and how it could've turned out.
I mean, what if the creator hadn't been a Scheme fan and was more conventional? We could've had another Java on our hands.
My only interest in a replacement for Javascript would be an IL, and even then it seems like most of the big ILs seem to be designed with "runs any language as long as it looks like C#/Java/Whatever" in mind. | null | 0 | 1315843254 | False | 0 | c2jb2up | t3_kcwx2 | null | t1_c2jb2up | t3_kcwx2 | null | 1427590351 | 3 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | tigeba | null | The majority of users probably don't care they are using the OpenJDK. The Oracle version has GC features that are not available in OpenJDK so this mostly an issue for people running Java servers. Despite being a little annoying for users that want/need the Oracle implementation, it will hopefully result in a better OpenJDK. | null | 0 | 1315843259 | False | 0 | c2jb2vj | t3_kcvv3 | null | t1_c2jb2vj | t1_c2j9xc9 | null | 1427590351 | 5 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | rizla7 | null | yes, repost but the threads are 2 years and 5 years old. | null | 0 | 1315843333 | False | 0 | c2jb36b | t3_kd60b | null | t1_c2jb36b | t3_kd60b | null | 1427590355 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | littleendian | null | I think you're right; developers checking in incomplete code into main says more about how we work than the technologies involved.
I do think branching in TFS is a needlessly heavy weight operation and having local repos is a better solution. | null | 0 | 1315843356 | False | 0 | c2jb39q | t3_kc5di | null | t1_c2jb39q | t1_c2j9tpb | null | 1427590356 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | epyk | null | I really hope these guys/girls succeed. If they can recreate the original swg and fix all the little bugs I'd love to play it again. The early days of swg were the most fun I've ever had of playing an online game. | null | 0 | 1315843370 | False | 0 | c2jb3cm | t3_kctmn | null | t1_c2jb3cm | t3_kctmn | null | 1427590357 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | PictureofPoritrin | null | Used to play on Lowca, and heard from a friend you guys just got atmospheric flight. Kind of awesome. | null | 0 | 1315843382 | False | 0 | c2jb3ee | t3_kctmn | null | t1_c2jb3ee | t3_kctmn | null | 1427590358 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | KumbajaMyLord | null | >Forcing would be putting a system in place, that others would be forced to use (as no other option). **I am not aware Google have such systems.
**
Exactly my point. Google is in the position to define new standards and everyone would use them, if they wanted to or not, for example when it comes to website metadata for search ranking.
Or the previously mentioned Google Gears, which was dropped as soon as an open standard was available (even though it meant that the offline capabilities for their product had to be reimplemented).
Google doesn't have a single proprietary protocol (afaik) and there are open APIs for virtually every service. Even SPDY is an open-standard. It's not like they are saying, hey we got this super new protocol that we use in our browser to make search queries run faster, but you can't use it in your browser. | null | 0 | 1315843402 | False | 0 | c2jb3ha | t3_kc9ai | null | t1_c2jb3ha | t1_c2jan93 | null | 1427590359 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | RizzlaPlus | null | assuming they had unit tests. | null | 0 | 1315843420 | False | 0 | c2jb3k5 | t3_kczbt | null | t1_c2jb3k5 | t1_c2jatda | null | 1427590370 | 9 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | happyscrappy | null | > It's almost as if the funding depended solely on Google's continued good will towards Mozilla. If that's the case, then it would make sense for Mozilla to avoid upsetting Google, especially when they'd pretty much collapse without the income from Google.
It's not goodwill. Google isn't paying them because they like them, they're paying them because Mozilla is sending them searches, which allows them to sell ads. Much like how you can join the Amazon affiliate program. You send a sale their way and they kick back a few percent of the money they make.
It's business. And again, the more searches that Google can reroute to being done through Chrome instead of Firefox (or Safari or Opera and I presume IE too) they more money Google saves by not paying the browser vendors. | null | 0 | 1315843450 | False | 0 | c2jb3ox | t3_kawp5 | null | t1_c2jb3ox | t1_c2j9432 | null | 1428194377 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | merlinm | null | Wasn't intentional -- just missed it. Good point. | null | 0 | 1315843475 | False | 0 | c2jb3sk | t3_kctmn | null | t1_c2jb3sk | t1_c2jb2iv | null | 1427590363 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | sphks | null | [Reference](http://download.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/deployment/applet/manipulatingDOMFromApplet.html) | null | 0 | 1315843477 | False | 0 | c2jb3sz | t3_kcwx2 | null | t1_c2jb3sz | t1_c2jap5w | null | 1427590363 | 10 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | [deleted] | null | No no no, google GO is the language of the future.
http://www.google.com/trends?q=go+language&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all&sort=0 | null | 0 | 1315843488 | False | 0 | c2jb3uh | t3_kcwx2 | null | t1_c2jb3uh | t1_c2jb1v7 | null | 1427590369 | 38 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | [deleted] | null | [deleted] | null | 0 | 1315843495 | False | 0 | c2jb3vf | t3_kc9ai | null | t1_c2jb3vf | t1_c2jaffy | null | 1427590369 | 0 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | [deleted] | null | probably because you only played the combat aspects. Never since has a real player economy and a strong crafting system been created. Why they had to make such a crap combat system, nobody knows(maybe they just were karmicly obliged to balance out for the awesome economy?) | null | 0 | 1315843510 | False | 0 | c2jb3xn | t3_kctmn | null | t1_c2jb3xn | t1_c2japwh | null | 1427590365 | 7 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | majek04 | null | > ...Yes, it does have a higher level API (with things like packet types
> abstracted), but you can also use it as a plain cross-browser...
True. Although I do prefer simpler models that try to solve only one problem.
> I am not sure about your confusion with regards to scaling, the same
> techniques that are covered on the SockJS site can also be used to
> 'spread out' connections in Socket.io or any other multi-server
> architecture. All I can see there is general/basic load balancing
> strategies, and they are not specific to SockJS (and equally
> applicable elsewhere).
They are general, but not directly applicable to socket.io. Let's look at socket.io request urls:
/socket.io/1/?t=1315842006232&jsonp=0
/socket.io/1/xhr-polling/7442581151161801054?t=1315842006465
So, If I wanted to do url-based sticky sessions, I would need to create rules:
- if url begins with /socket.io/ and has two parts, do round-robin
- if url begins with /socket.io/ and has four parts, do sticky sessions based on fourth part
Not obvious, but doable.
Cookie story:
- flashsockets don't do cookies AFAIK (but are disabled by default)
- xhr-polling doesn't do cookies on IE8+ (unless xdomainrequest is disabled, in which case cross domain doesn't work). You end up using ugly jsonp for IE if you want both cookies and cross domain.
- It's unobvious how to tweak Socket.io to set JSESSIONID, but this is more of an API rant.
I do agree - SockJS is a very similar project to Socket.io. But, there are some subtle differences. My intention is to keep SockJS simple and robust.
| null | 0 | 1315843536 | True | 0 | c2jb41v | t3_kcxbr | null | t1_c2jb41v | t1_c2jaqaw | null | 1427590367 | 4 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | [deleted] | null | [deleted] | null | 0 | 1315843537 | False | 0 | c2jb427 | t3_k85xr | null | t1_c2jb427 | t3_k85xr | null | 1427590370 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | elder_george | null | I didn't compare TFS with DVCSs. I compared TFS with other CVCS, in particular with SVN.
Anyway, from my experience shelvesets are useful not only as local branches/stashes but as a tool of code review as well, i.e. as better replacement for patches.
I don't know why shelvesets are tied to branches, I guess it's because they represent a work done as a part of particular release (or some other stage of development).
But anyway it's usually not a problem to move shelveset from one branch to another when necessary. | null | 0 | 1315843614 | False | 0 | c2jb4e2 | t3_kc5di | null | t1_c2jb4e2 | t1_c2j9u6y | null | 1427590373 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | merlinm | null | yeah -- also column level collations were added. another feature you don't care about or absolutely hated not having. I'm surprised that didn't make the press release actually. | null | 0 | 1315843624 | False | 0 | c2jb4fm | t3_kd0x9 | null | t1_c2jb4fm | t1_c2jb1ry | null | 1427590373 | 7 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | cdsmith | null | There are compatibility-related flaws, like properties with magical behaviors, and so on, that make it impossible to implement a clean runtime system because this or that system-defined object behaves in some bizarre way just because someone got it wrong some time in 1998.
There are problems with too much reliance on runtime evaluation. In the not-so-distant past, things like timers *required* you to pass around strings containing code. While JavaScript can provide alternatives in the form of passing around first-class functions, it will have trouble removing these old bits, which are a constraint on the implementation and make the language slower and browsers harder to build and maintain.
Finally, there's what Google is calling "toolability". For example, the ability to do things like scan a library and determine what's in it, so that you can generate documentation, or break up the code into blocks for profiling or code coverage tools, or write refactoring tools that are guaranteed not to break your code. Dart also will likely have optional static types (if you declare them, the compiler will check them), which means that language constructs have to at least be basically amenable to a type-checking algorithm. JavaScript wasn't designed for these things, and writing them with the existing JavaScript language is a significant challenge. | null | 0 | 1315843655 | False | 0 | c2jb4kr | t3_kcwx2 | null | t1_c2jb4kr | t1_c2ja5k2 | null | 1427590374 | 11 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | [deleted] | null | what's the standards process to introduce a new client-side language for the web, again? Oh right, it doesn't exist. | null | 0 | 1315843718 | False | 0 | c2jb4ub | t3_kc9ai | null | t1_c2jb4ub | t1_c2j924p | null | 1427590380 | 0 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | [deleted] | null | [deleted] | null | 0 | 1315843754 | False | 0 | c2jb507 | t3_kctmn | null | t1_c2jb507 | t1_c2jb3xn | null | 1427590379 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | cdsmith | null | This is a library issue, not a language issue. You'd probably be better off looking elsewhere for new libraries. | null | 0 | 1315843781 | False | 0 | c2jb543 | t3_kcwx2 | null | t1_c2jb543 | t1_c2ja3rn | null | 1427590380 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | [deleted] | null | can't wait for a better web. Let's hope Google doesn't forget about making their new stack as open as possible. | null | 0 | 1315843786 | False | 0 | c2jb553 | t3_kc9ai | null | t1_c2jb553 | t3_kc9ai | null | 1427590381 | 0 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | alabipep | null | No. C++ is THE pefect example of how TO evolve a language. VB is the perfect example of how not to.
If you want a different language, you should create, instead of evolve to, a different language. | null | 0 | 1315843809 | False | 0 | c2jb58c | t3_kcwx2 | null | t1_c2jb58c | t1_c2jaz8b | null | 1427590382 | 4 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | ICCULUSC | null | The original MMORPG? What the fuck are you smoking? Ultima Online? EverQuest? SW:G was late to the party and poorly dressed. | null | 0 | 1315843867 | False | 0 | c2jb5hi | t3_kctmn | null | t1_c2jb5hi | t3_kctmn | null | 1427590385 | -5 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | tomekrs | null | how is this better from [socky!](https://github.com/socky)? | null | 0 | 1315843932 | False | 0 | c2jb5s7 | t3_kcxbr | null | t1_c2jb5s7 | t3_kcxbr | null | 1427590389 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | maskull | null | Thanks, my internet is being flaky, so I couldn't look it up. | null | 0 | 1315843940 | False | 0 | c2jb5ty | t3_kcwx2 | null | t1_c2jb5ty | t1_c2jb3sz | null | 1427590389 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | bigdubs | null | depends what you're talking about.
MSSQL:
;with CTE as ( select xyz from abc ) insert into yada yada
is reallly:
;with cte as ( select xyz from abe ) select * into yadayada from cte
also works for updates and deletes but you have to put the from clause as the cte. this has been around since sql2005.
ex:
;with cte as ( select xyz from abe) update set things = cte.otherthings from cte
what MSSQL does *not* have is
;with cte as ( update yada yada set things = otherthings returning *) select * from cte
but generally i've found mixing transactions like this problematic from a concurrency / locking point of view and try to avoid it
| null | 0 | 1315843954 | False | 0 | c2jb5vz | t3_kd0x9 | null | t1_c2jb5vz | t1_c2jb2ht | null | 1427590390 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | jboy55 | null | Or how Microsoft first implemented Java or Jscript? | null | 0 | 1315843959 | False | 0 | c2jb5ws | t3_kcwx2 | null | t1_c2jb5ws | t1_c2j9yxh | null | 1427590390 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | sigzero | null | Some alternate future where the world is rules by GUnicorns maybe. | null | 0 | 1315843971 | False | 0 | c2jb5za | t3_kcwx2 | null | t1_c2jb5za | t1_c2jb3uh | null | 1427590391 | 10 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | mdempsky | null | The engineers who work on V8 are different from the engineers who work on Google+. Just FYI... | null | 0 | 1315844035 | False | 0 | c2jb69y | t3_kcwx2 | null | t1_c2jb69y | t1_c2jas73 | null | 1427590395 | 7 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | elder_george | null | Surely. But share of TFS (in its current form) is projects requiring (for some reason) ability of centralized access management, not those that benefit from full repository access.
Another thing is shelvesets in TFS work different from those in hg (or git stash for that matter). As I said in another comment, they can be used for code reviews as well.
I like DVCSs very much, but there're scenarios where CVCSs work *OK* as well. | null | 0 | 1315844063 | False | 0 | c2jb6ej | t3_kc5di | null | t1_c2jb6ej | t1_c2j9t7l | null | 1427590397 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | cdsmith | null | Yes, because Google, one of the largest companies in the world, can only do one thing at a time. And I'm sure if all 28,000 Google employees were assigned to Google+, they could figure out how to manage them all, right? | null | 0 | 1315844067 | False | 0 | c2jb6f8 | t3_kcwx2 | null | t1_c2jb6f8 | t1_c2jas73 | null | 1427590397 | 20 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | OMouse | null | We need a programmer's search engine -_-' | null | 0 | 1315844091 | False | 0 | c2jb6it | t3_kcwx2 | null | t1_c2jb6it | t1_c2jaym0 | null | 1427590398 | 14 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | Whanhee | null | Or sometimes I just want an array of numbers...
Anyways, not everyone has the luxury of working in high level languages with no regards to memory. | null | 0 | 1315844148 | False | 0 | c2jb6sd | t3_kbdgw | null | t1_c2jb6sd | t1_c2j5xpb | null | 1427590401 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | [deleted] | null | [deleted] | null | 0 | 1315844179 | False | 0 | c2jb6x6 | t3_k7o9e | null | t1_c2jb6x6 | t3_k7o9e | null | 1427590403 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | tty2 | null | Well, notice that comment on the SO post (inside the link) referring to Reddit? Look at the date there. It's like 2009. | null | 0 | 1315844199 | False | 0 | c2jb706 | t3_kchtc | null | t1_c2jb706 | t1_c2j9b1y | null | 1427590405 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | AlSweigart | null | I checked the rules same can confirm this. | null | 0 | 1315844215 | False | 0 | c2jb72k | t3_kbbbu | null | t1_c2jb72k | t1_c2iyt7c | null | 1427590406 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | TraxTech | null | Bucardo is **a**synchronous, not synchronous and it cannot replicate between more than two masters (from the FAQ). These are severe limitations. | null | 0 | 1315844227 | False | 0 | c2jb74b | t3_kd0x9 | null | t1_c2jb74b | t1_c2jb2af | null | 1427590406 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | elder_george | null | For some reasons, projects I worked on (including those using SVN) were always reluctant to use feature branches. I don't know the reasoning behind it, but at least I can be not affected with it now. | null | 0 | 1315844229 | False | 0 | c2jb74o | t3_kc5di | null | t1_c2jb74o | t1_c2j9e21 | null | 1427590406 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | [deleted] | null | [deleted] | null | 0 | 1315844246 | False | 0 | c2jb77s | t3_kcwx2 | null | t1_c2jb77s | t1_c2ja5k2 | null | 1427590407 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | alabipep | null | I agree. Everything is "fundamentally flawed". If you don't feel it is flawed, find someone who does.
New languages created to fix some existing ones will remain to be that --- fix.
A fix, as good as it might be, is just a fix (read, uncreative or less creative).
That said, I think JS needs some serious fixes. :-) | null | 0 | 1315844276 | False | 0 | c2jb7cx | t3_kcwx2 | null | t1_c2jb7cx | t1_c2ja9o9 | null | 1427590409 | 5 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | [deleted] | null | The scoping rules are even worse than JavaScript's (confuses assignment with initialization, and disallows assigning to variables from the outer scope), and that's a pretty fundamental flaw if you ask me. | null | 0 | 1315844296 | False | 0 | c2jb7ga | t3_kc9ai | null | t1_c2jb7ga | t1_c2j966z | null | 1427590410 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | Whanhee | null | In Korea, when you are born your age is 1. Partly though, the reasoning is that you spent a while being a fetus too. | null | 0 | 1315844306 | False | 0 | c2jb7i6 | t3_kbdgw | null | t1_c2jb7i6 | t1_c2iyr8d | null | 1427590411 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | rmxz | null | Looking like a good month for F/OSS databases.
[Postgres 9.1 today](http://www.reddit.com/tb/kd0x9).
[Riak 1.0 also this month](http://blog.basho.com/2011/09/07/Riak-is-Going-To-Have-a-Huge-September/).
I look forward to comparing Riak 1.0 with Mongo 2.0. Last time I tried mongo worked better when our database wasn't much larger than the RAM in the cluster; but Riak degraded better as the database exceeded the cluster's RAM. Interesting to see if that's true today.
| null | 0 | 1315844377 | False | 0 | c2jb7t8 | t3_kd5f6 | null | t1_c2jb7t8 | t3_kd5f6 | null | 1427590415 | 18 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | mistoroboto | null | Hey look everyone, it's another scripting language we don't need. Thanks Google for wasting our time. | null | 0 | 1315844413 | False | 0 | c2jb816 | t3_kcwx2 | null | t1_c2jb816 | t3_kcwx2 | null | 1427590418 | 3 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | happyscrappy | null | Working with standards committees takes forever. Sometimes just making something good and then offering it to others for free (not just as in beer) is a much better way to get things done. | null | 0 | 1315844459 | False | 0 | c2jb88n | t3_kcwx2 | null | t1_c2jb88n | t3_kcwx2 | null | 1427590421 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | kniteli | null | Reminds me of project1999. Sounds cool but I never really played SWG so devving up on it seems a bit silly for me. | null | 0 | 1315844463 | False | 0 | c2jb89m | t3_kctmn | null | t1_c2jb89m | t3_kctmn | null | 1427590421 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | azimir | null | I just love using it to push deadringer spies into the corner and keep them there until their invincibility wears off. Then: AX TIME! | null | 0 | 1315844498 | False | 0 | c2jb8f5 | t3_kctmn | null | t1_c2jb8f5 | t1_c2jaqpz | null | 1427590423 | -1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | happyscrappy | null | The statement Eich makes may mean nothing if he isn't even admitting to himself he's worried about JS being replaced by a better language. | null | 0 | 1315844511 | False | 0 | c2jb8hy | t3_kcwx2 | null | t1_c2jb8hy | t1_c2j9qtx | null | 1427590425 | 3 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | Cho_Gath | null | > And how exactly would this be different than flash ;)
By being a scripting language and not a 3rd party browser plugin. If you want to compare it to something in the Flash tech tree, compare it to ActionScript. | null | 0 | 1315844525 | False | 0 | c2jb8k2 | t3_kcwx2 | null | t1_c2jb8k2 | t1_c2jaefg | null | 1427590425 | 3 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | rmxz | null | Ah - sorry - my mistake.
PGCluster & PGPool are the synchronous options. | null | 0 | 1315844531 | False | 0 | c2jb8l5 | t3_kd0x9 | null | t1_c2jb8l5 | t1_c2jb74b | null | 1427590425 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | drig23 | null | Absolutely! That was the really frustrating part. You had to figure out if each feature worked as documented. | null | 0 | 1315844557 | False | 0 | c2jb8pr | t3_kc9ai | null | t1_c2jb8pr | t1_c2j6p8e | null | 1427590432 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | bluedanieru | null | >The real problem is that Google has shown no ability at all to cooperate with others.
Didn't they recently give HTC a stockpile of bullshit patent ammo to use against Apple and their bullshit patents? Google cooperates. | null | 0 | 1315844585 | False | 0 | c2jb8ux | t3_kcwx2 | null | t1_c2jb8ux | t1_c2jamil | null | 1427590439 | 4 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | grauenwolf | null | That's fine if you are sending personal photos. It isn't so great when you are sending a technical specification. | null | 0 | 1315844590 | False | 0 | c2jb8vu | t3_kc9ai | null | t1_c2jb8vu | t1_c2jb1kv | null | 1427590439 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | merlinm | null | > but generally i've found mixing transactions like this problematic from a concurrency / locking point of view and try to avoid it
couple points:
> with cte as ( update yada yada set things = otherthings returning *) select * from cte
is simply: update yada yada set things = otherthings returning *; -- which we've had since 8.2.
The only reason to push into a CTE is if you wanted to say, join the output to another table...which you absolutely would want to do. I'm not buying your point on concurrency/locking -- you have to deal with this either way. There is no benefit to letting the application do it -- besides you have to extract a whole pile of data over the wire only to have to feed it right back to the database. No bueno.
edit: version# | null | 0 | 1315844614 | True | 0 | c2jb90d | t3_kd0x9 | null | t1_c2jb90d | t1_c2jb5vz | null | 1427590433 | 3 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | littleendian | null | I agree, if that was something I had to do often I wouldn't want to use TFS either but I can't recall the last time I had to revert a commit. Do you find yourself regularly having to do so? | null | 0 | 1315844631 | False | 0 | c2jb93g | t3_kc5di | null | t1_c2jb93g | t1_c2j994d | null | 1427590435 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | jeanlucpikachu | null | [insufficient profanity](http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/1717) | null | 0 | 1315844654 | False | 0 | c2jb97a | t3_kd1nr | null | t1_c2jb97a | t3_kd1nr | null | 1427590435 | 5 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | mistralol | null |
As I said there is almost no gain for us with that. It works fine for us currently. Its not broken. Why risk breaking it for no gain?
| null | 0 | 1315844715 | False | 0 | c2jb9hm | t3_kc5di | null | t1_c2jb9hm | t1_c2j6iy3 | null | 1427590440 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | sidneyc | null | I see. My context is the commercial reality though.
| null | 0 | 1315844747 | False | 0 | c2jb9ni | t3_kc9ai | null | t1_c2jb9ni | t1_c2j9zks | null | 1427590442 | 0 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | rizla7 | null | **incorrect**. the stated goal is to eventually replace JS completely, which means there will no x-compiler.
if you are thinking about the interim then that is **extremely** short-sighted. see my post about *security issues*.
the end result is what matters. of course it will never remain as a x-compiled solution forever because then it would make absolutely no sense... | null | 0 | 1315844767 | False | 0 | c2jb9qk | t3_kcwx2 | null | t1_c2jb9qk | t1_c2ja3mt | null | 1427590443 | -12 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | majek04 | null | I'm not a socky expert, but:
- Socky seems to have a richer model: subscribe/trigger/presence, while SockJS is only a transport layer - you get messages in and out, that's it.
- SockJS tries to emulate WebSocket API, so when websockets catch up you can trash SockJS and use native websocket object without rewriting your application.
- It's unobvious how to deploy and scale socky (but maybe it's only a documentation issue?)
- I can't find any details about what protocols are supported by socky except websockets.
- Socky seems to have ruby server, while SockJS currently has node.js server.
| null | 0 | 1315844854 | False | 0 | c2jba53 | t3_kcxbr | null | t1_c2jba53 | t1_c2jb5s7 | null | 1427590446 | 3 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | cgibbard | null | Except that essentially nobody actually cares about the continuity of that map in a general sense, and people who do are happy enough being explicit about the domain of the function they're discussing, so there's no potential for confusion. | null | 0 | 1315844895 | True | 0 | c2jbabq | t3_kbgvc | null | t1_c2jbabq | t1_c2jai5b | null | 1427590449 | -1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | TraxTech | null | Being capable of handling only one master outage is like praying for no disk failure during the rebuild of a RAID-5 array...
| null | 0 | 1315844902 | False | 0 | c2jbacr | t3_kd0x9 | null | t1_c2jbacr | t1_c2jb1wg | null | 1427590449 | 3 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | lennelpennel | null | it was a beautiful language in its own way. years of java and other OO supposed languages have sullied my memory. | null | 0 | 1315844921 | False | 0 | c2jbagb | t3_kcwx2 | null | t1_c2jbagb | t1_c2jb018 | null | 1427590449 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | cgibbard | null | Well, it depends in exactly the same way as every other definition in mathematics. Obviously, if you don't like any definition, you can use a different one. Mathematics isn't handed down to humanity on golden platters by the council of math gnomes. Obviously we're in charge of the rules. But there are advantages to agreeing on some definitions so that when we talk to each other we understand what is meant.
There are good reasons to accept the standard definition that 0^0 = 1, and no particularly good reasons to leave 0^0 undefined. *Maybe* in some settings there are reasons to talk about restrictions of the resulting function to particular subdomains on which it's continuous, but even those are kinda rare, and there's no reason to arbitrarily cripple the usual definition.
It's similar to wanting to leave, oh, |x| undefined when x = 0, just because it's not differentiable at 0, such that we have to always handle that case separately when it might arise. It's unnecessary inconvenience for little to no benefit. | null | 0 | 1315844931 | True | 0 | c2jbahu | t3_kbgvc | null | t1_c2jbahu | t1_c2j9qte | null | 1427590460 | 0 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
Subsets and Splits
Filtered Reddit Uplifting News
The query retrieves specific news articles by their link IDs, providing a basic overview of those particular entries without deeper analysis or insights.
Recent Programming Comments
Returns a limited set of programming records from 2020 to 2023, providing basic filtering with minimal analytical value.