archived
stringclasses
2 values
author
stringlengths
3
20
author_fullname
stringlengths
4
12
body
stringlengths
0
22.5k
comment_type
stringclasses
1 value
controversiality
stringclasses
2 values
created_utc
stringlengths
10
10
edited
stringlengths
4
12
gilded
stringclasses
7 values
id
stringlengths
1
7
link_id
stringlengths
7
10
locked
stringclasses
2 values
name
stringlengths
4
10
parent_id
stringlengths
5
10
permalink
stringlengths
41
91
retrieved_on
stringlengths
10
10
score
stringlengths
1
4
subreddit_id
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_name_prefixed
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_type
stringclasses
1 value
total_awards_received
stringclasses
19 values
True
[deleted]
null
So you'd use Java then.
null
0
1316559323
False
0
c2lcwsm
t3_kljc0
null
t1_c2lcwsm
t1_c2l87b1
null
1427625801
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316559331
False
0
c2lcwu3
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2lcwu3
t1_c2lcucb
null
1427625801
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
n1c0_ds
null
Let's touch base on that
null
0
1316559346
False
0
c2lcwwy
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lcwwy
t1_c2ladkj
null
1427625802
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
It depends on what kind of program you are writing. If you're writing a game, there are pretty good choices, such as marmalade, for cross-platform game development (including all platforms mentioned above). If you're writing a business app or something that requires a more traditional UI, there are at least good options for writing software that will hit all of the desktop platforms. Qt/WxWidgets work for that. At this point, however, it seems as though HTML/JS (or GWT) would not be a bad choice for these types of apps, even if it means embedding a web frame. One example of an app that works like this is Gmail on Android. Most of it is presented in a html/js widget.
null
0
1316559555
False
0
c2lcxxs
t3_klgme
null
t1_c2lcxxs
t1_c2lcr4t
null
1427625816
8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316559567
False
0
c2lcxzz
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2lcxzz
t3_klqte
null
1427625816
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
No his position is that the developers should give if they took. Give a little, take a lot.
null
0
1316559676
False
0
c2lcyhk
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2lcyhk
t1_c2l990j
null
1427625823
9
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
No his position is that the developers should give if they took. Give a little, take a lot.
null
0
1316559751
False
0
c2lcyvb
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2lcyvb
t1_c2l990j
null
1427625828
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
s73v3r
null
>Say the inventor demo'd it to you, asking for an investment, but you realized, hey, this guy can't afford to patent, so he can't afford to sue. I'll take his presentation materials, give them to a guy I know, and file for the patent myself. Maybe change the doo-dad to a gew-gaw to avoid any funny questions later. That's why the inventor makes you sign an NDA prior to showing it to you. That way, if you do happen to patent something that is eerily similar to the invention, they can invalidate your patent. >If you believe the liars who constantly lie about their reasons (that is, the government). Mindless trolling, no need to respond. >First-to-file is meant to protect the wealthy and major businesses, and we all know it. No it's not. It's meant to bring our law in line with the rest of the world. And now, it's easier for small businesses too, as they don't have to adhere to the strict documentation requirements for the date and time of the work on their inventions. >Any bullshit and bluster about alignment or court speed is just an excuse. Because it couldn't possibly have any benefit right? Everything is done just because it makes the rich money? >Good luck finding a lawyer to invalidate that patent when you couldn't afford to file a patent first, to begin with. Good luck doing the same fucking thing in a first-to-invent system. >"It just means that it eliminates the protection of the inventor and burdens them by forcing them engage a legal suit to prove what they didn't have to prove before, and pay a lawyer to do it." Wrong. >And both of those actions start the clock ticking on your date of first disclosure, which means under the best circumstances, you have two years to find the money to patent. Yeah. So? At least with this, you know someone else can't steal your patent. And if you can't come up with the money after producing your product, then maybe it wasn't worth patenting in the first place. >Do you not understand how this is a huge new burden on underfunded inventors, or do you just not give a shit? Do you not understand how much of a *monumental* burden the previous system was on underfunded inventors, or are you just a troll?
null
0
1316559768
False
0
c2lcyyr
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2lcyyr
t1_c2lbejg
null
1427625829
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
s73v3r
null
Yes, it does. Good thing that's not what the new system allows.
null
0
1316559790
False
0
c2lcz2b
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2lcz2b
t1_c2lb3rp
null
1427625831
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
iamplasma
null
Strictly speaking, such a patent is (or at least is meant to be) invalid, on the basis it would necessarily lack sufficient details for a person skilled in the relevant art to build the Awesome Machine, due to its failing to specify what the heck the Magic Piece is. At least, that's my understanding. And I do accept that in practice (especially the way American litigation works) the costs of proving that can be prohibitive.
null
0
1316559828
False
0
c2lcz8c
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2lcz8c
t1_c2lbsl5
null
1427625833
15
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
s73v3r
null
There's a difference between patenting something your employees come up with, and patenting something that someone else came up with. It's not right, but it can be argued that Edison would own the patents his employees came up with.
null
0
1316559860
False
0
c2lczdu
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2lczdu
t1_c2lbu0q
null
1427625835
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
>He holds that only free software is ever acceptable. There's no tradeoff allowed about whether you'd like to make money or not, you are supposed to write free software only. Yea that's his position. In order to better humanity he feels that all users of all software should have the right to access the source code of the software they use. He has figured out a way to try and achieve his goal and despite being pitted against the likes of Microsoft, Oracle, IBM, HP etc he has by and large succeeded. Of course Microsoft and it's allies are going to fight him and his ideals for as long as they can but basically he has already won.
null
0
1316559926
False
0
c2lczod
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2lczod
t1_c2la1pf
null
1427625839
-4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
s73v3r
null
No it won't. Of course, that would actually take doing some research, and not being closed minded about the whole thing.
null
0
1316559960
False
0
c2lcztz
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2lcztz
t1_c2lb3fc
null
1427625841
-1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
max99x
null
Being a REPL, we've stripped out the graphics functions. Maybe try it in the canvas version (http://stevehanov.ca/blog/index.php?id=92)?
null
0
1316559969
False
0
c2lczv6
t3_klv3o
null
t1_c2lczv6
t1_c2lcou5
null
1427625843
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
The GPL is the is the best way to make money in open source. Dual licensing is the key. Mysql made hundreds of millions for example.
null
0
1316560034
False
0
c2ld05n
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2ld05n
t1_c2lak97
null
1427625846
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
What is wrong with being extremely pro consumer and pro developer?
null
0
1316560057
False
0
c2ld09c
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2ld09c
t1_c2l9792
null
1427625847
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Only if you use another developers work.
null
0
1316560097
False
0
c2ld0f7
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2ld0f7
t1_c2la13o
null
1427625852
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
s73v3r
null
Wikipedia disagrees with you: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attorneys_in_Japan
null
0
1316560101
False
0
c2ld0g5
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2ld0g5
t1_c2lcmlw
null
1427625852
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
So basically you want to take and never give. That doesn't seem very developer friendly to me.
null
0
1316560161
False
0
c2ld0p7
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2ld0p7
t1_c2lbha6
null
1427625852
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
s73v3r
null
Actually, Trolls don't usually file patents themselves. Trolls typically show up at auction sales to companies that are going under, and buy patents from them.
null
0
1316560191
False
0
c2ld0th
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2ld0th
t1_c2lbinl
null
1427625854
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
iamplasma
null
While it sounds like a great theory, prohibiting such patents would also have some very bad side-effects. For example, many drugs are developed by smaller biotech companies, which are often incorporated for the specific purpose of researching and developing a single compound. However, those companies cannot practicably ever sell what they invent directly to the market, since the cost of setting up a complete manufacturing, marketing and distribution infrastructure is prohibitive if it's only to sell a single drug. Instead, those biotech companies work on the specific basis that, at the end of the day, if they develop a new wonder drug they can market it to the Big Pharma companies that already do have marketing and distribution infrastructures, so that they can sell it. If it were the case that such companies couldn't obtain patents, because they weren't intending to directly put their product to market, it would become impossible for such companies to viably operate, and suddenly you'd lose all commercial drug research outside of that run directly by the big pharmaceutical companies. That, plainly, isn't a good thing. Even if you went with a "softer" approach and merely invalidated a patent if it wasn't marketed within a few years, you'd still have much the same problem. Big Pharma would then still have an unfairly stronger bargaining position, since rather than paying for a patent it could choose to simply "wait out" the couple of years it takes for a small company's patent to expire, then sell their invention without paying a cent. It's currently a lot harder to do that when they'd have to wait 20 years.
null
0
1316560229
False
0
c2ld0zj
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2ld0zj
t1_c2laok4
null
1427625856
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
s73v3r
null
>Would this company not have the moral and legal right to sue people who use the idea without paying up? No. Not unless they were actually using that patent to make a product. Otherwise they are just parasitic extortionists.
null
0
1316560250
False
0
c2ld12y
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2ld12y
t1_c2lbqq7
null
1427625857
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Alexis_
null
And does that tell me that: a) C and C++ and excellent languages that excel at their job b) most things we can possibly do with another language, we do in another language, while C/C++ is only still used where no other alternatives can replace them. (Hint: the answer is b)
null
0
1316560377
False
0
c2ld1pe
t3_klgme
null
t1_c2ld1pe
t1_c2lcec6
null
1427625866
-3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316560416
False
0
c2ld1ul
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2ld1ul
t1_c2lcrfa
null
1427625867
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316560430
False
0
c2ld1wz
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2ld1wz
t1_c2l84ug
null
1427625868
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316560431
False
0
c2ld1x5
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2ld1x5
t1_c2lbf8u
null
1427625868
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
s73v3r
null
>many forms of 'intellectual property' and design should not be patented at all (ie, the general design of the iphone). While I agree that it shouldn't be patented, something distinct like the design of the iPhone should be able to have it's "trade dress" protected, lest copycat companies try to produce knockoffs that look like it. Like in China.
null
0
1316560440
False
0
c2ld1yt
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2ld1yt
t1_c2lcgm0
null
1427625869
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
inmatarian
null
I agree. But that's a hiring/performance review/firing thing. All of the team members should be involved in candidate interviews and team members should be allowed to do performance reviews of each other. Firing people is a seriously touchy subject, but continued employment is contingent on good performance reviews.
null
0
1316560464
False
0
c2ld22e
t3_kk5f4
null
t1_c2ld22e
t1_c2lcj8j
null
1427625870
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
> Unix is supposed to be simple, predictable and not bite. `cp * dst` [...] Create a file named `-rf`, then do `rm *`, then tell me again what Unix is supposed to be and what it isn't supposed to do to your ass... I mean, Unix is fucking gnarly, fundamentally. The sooner you denounce the naive propaganda of recent adepts, come to terms with the fact that it's a blob of incongruent petrified mammoth shit (but still better than all existing alternatives, sadly), and curb your futile perfectionism, the happier you'll become.
null
0
1316560510
False
0
c2ld2a9
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2ld2a9
t1_c2l8tl0
null
1427625873
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ethraax
null
Can you imagine how much larger their source code repository would be? What a waste...
null
0
1316560519
False
0
c2ld2bx
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2ld2bx
t1_c2l94wo
null
1427625874
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
s73v3r
null
Wow, this is an amazing idea, and a pretty reasonable solution to the problem. The only question I'd have is how do you valuate a patent? Does every patent have a flat value? Or does it have a relation to it's value on the market? The value of the products it's in, maybe adjusted for the percent of the product that depends on it?
null
0
1316560520
False
0
c2ld2c2
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2ld2c2
t1_c2lckc8
null
1427625874
15
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
s73v3r
null
>And don't even get me started on using a tablet UI on a desktop. I think it might have not been working in the last Developer Preview, but you are supposed to have the option of a regular, desktop Windows looking UI when on the desktop.
null
0
1316560595
False
0
c2ld2ne
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2ld2ne
t1_c2l50he
null
1427625878
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
doubtingthomas
null
Common Lisp _is_ strongly typed, just not (generally) statically typed.
null
0
1316560632
False
0
c2ld2tk
t3_kljc0
null
t1_c2ld2tk
t1_c2lc78m
null
1427625881
14
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
grauenwolf
null
Yep. By being the only ones not constrained by the GPL, and having customers that likewise had no interest in that license, they were able to make a fortune. Had they offered a truly free open source license like Apache or BSD, that wouldn't have happened. But on the other hand the company that arose from the ashes of MySQL AB would be able to do something besides give bug fixes to Oracle to resell.
null
0
1316560674
False
0
c2ld301
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2ld301
t1_c2ld05n
null
1427625882
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Just remember context when looking at code
null
0
1316560692
False
0
c2ld33t
t3_klrrx
null
t1_c2ld33t
t1_c2lc1ea
null
1427625884
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
preshing
null
You are completely right. Big thanks for pointing this out! Not sure how I managed to mess that up, but it's fixed now.
null
0
1316560826
False
0
c2ld3pv
t3_kljpc
null
t1_c2ld3pv
t1_c2lcc06
null
1427625893
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
NitWit005
null
So, if someone suggests that a building is on fire and this is a problem, your response is "you aren't an expert on burning buildings!"? It is possible to grasp a problem without devoting your life to a subject.
null
0
1316560832
False
0
c2ld3qu
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2ld3qu
t1_c2lbzfa
null
1427625893
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
godless_communism
null
that is awsum!!
null
0
1316560849
False
0
c2ld3tz
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2ld3tz
t1_c2lay3i
null
1427625895
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
JL235
null
I had a C/Unix course at University with two lecturers. One did a long lecture about using bash and grep, and for his examples he used a real world example, automated marking of assignments, for which he called the folder 'ass'. The other lecturer set us a string concatenation assignment, called 'scat' for short. The result was several students filling their C code with variables/functions called 'assScat', and various pseudo references to German fecal-pornography.
null
0
1316560864
False
0
c2ld3wi
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2ld3wi
t3_klhlv
null
1427625895
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
s73v3r
null
How so? Were you trying to use it as you would a tablet, or were you talking all over performance?
null
0
1316560866
False
0
c2ld3ws
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2ld3ws
t1_c2l9kq6
null
1427625895
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
darkpaladin
null
I prefer the whitespace. It makes things more readable later on down the line.
null
0
1316560887
False
0
c2ld406
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2ld406
t1_c2lat63
null
1427625907
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
bjabes
null
that's not how we built it actually. the way it works is similar though at a very high level. we inject ourselves into the process and when an user wants to capture a frame, we record all input into DirectX and write out all the state to disk (including vertex data, texture data etc...). Then we can replay the capture at any point and you can inspect all the associated data.
null
0
1316560924
False
0
c2ld465
t3_kg44k
null
t1_c2ld465
t1_c2k6w97
null
1427625899
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
eriksrx
null
I'll be there helping Intel at their booth but would love to meet other redditors!
null
0
1316560934
False
0
c2ld47p
t3_km48r
null
t1_c2ld47p
t3_km48r
null
1427625900
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
My favorite in MATLAB was always [cumsum](http://www.mathworks.com/help/techdoc/ref/cumsum.html) Edit: also cumprod
null
0
1316560956
False
0
c2ld4bc
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2ld4bc
t3_klhlv
null
1428193604
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
doubtingthomas
null
.. and who is going to teach your army of developers that don't know X how to use it properly at scale? Hiring a good number of people who already have real experience in X pays off, because new developers can get up to speed faster, good examples can be set, and mistakes and misuses in foundational code can be avoided. So yes, # of folks who know X isn't a primary concern, but it is a real benefit to be able to hire people with real experience in the technology you are using. If X is better enough than the alternatives, it can make up the difference later, but "how easy is it to hire developers who know X" is something to be seriously considered, especially for a large project.
null
0
1316560957
False
0
c2ld4bq
t3_kljc0
null
t1_c2ld4bq
t1_c2lbu1n
null
1428193604
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
bjabes
null
could you be a little more specific? we definitely want you to be able to go from basic editor view to simple app but we don't expose the rendering engine as a reusable component if that's what you're asking. we will help you put together a simple scene though with code that you can write/mode. we think of it as a simple prototyping experience.
null
0
1316561042
False
0
c2ld4rf
t3_kg44k
null
t1_c2ld4rf
t1_c2k15id
null
1427625911
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
s73v3r
null
They want to do the whole "It's one OS, but it runs on both platforms! OMG!" And people will think that you can run your regular legacy Windows apps on tablet Win8, and then be super upset when you can't.
null
0
1316561085
False
0
c2ld4yu
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2ld4yu
t1_c2l76qf
null
1427625913
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
lawyers don't run Japan - as opposed to the USA
null
0
1316561108
False
0
c2ld52p
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2ld52p
t1_c2ld0g5
null
1427625914
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Fair enough. However, I still think that if people want a quality product, they will pay for it. iPhone ripoffs are always going to be crap, the QC just isn't there. I'm all for specific trademarks (ie, apple with the context of the products it sells), however even trademarks should have their limit (ie, iPhone vs iAnythingelsejustincase)
null
0
1316561153
False
0
c2ld5a6
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2ld5a6
t1_c2ld1yt
null
1427625916
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
s73v3r
null
And that legacy app still won't work if you're running it on an ARM tablet. If you're running it on an x86 tablet, you're gonna have to have a keyboard and mouse, as the UI won't work with a touchscreen.
null
0
1316561163
False
0
c2ld5bu
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2ld5bu
t1_c2l849o
null
1427625916
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
bjabes
null
actually that non-standard extension works with STL collections but we don't recommend it.
null
0
1316561225
False
0
c2ld5m8
t3_kg44k
null
t1_c2ld5m8
t1_c2k5c4j
null
1427625922
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
s73v3r
null
Unless that docking station also has an x86 processor, it still won't work for legacy apps.
null
0
1316561238
False
0
c2ld5p0
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2ld5p0
t1_c2latkv
null
1427625923
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
MarshallBanana
null
I've probably given more than you ever will.
null
0
1316561246
False
0
c2ld5qg
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2ld5qg
t1_c2ld0p7
null
1427625923
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
I've played so much Quake 2 and Quake 3 that I think my dreams are actually coded with Quake Engine. Most of my dreams have similar gritty textures, gravity, and feel that Quake does, but with more advanced level design.
null
0
1316561259
False
0
c2ld5sp
t3_klrrx
null
t1_c2ld5sp
t3_klrrx
null
1427625923
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
s73v3r
null
You already can. Win8 tablets aren't going to be able to do anything more than current tablets.
null
0
1316561268
False
0
c2ld5ui
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2ld5ui
t1_c2l7qr7
null
1427625923
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
godless_communism
null
You're the [lava flow](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lava_flow_%28programming%29) bandit!
null
0
1316561285
False
0
c2ld5xi
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2ld5xi
t1_c2lablz
null
1427625924
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
s73v3r
null
None of that shit will work if it's an ARM based tablet.
null
0
1316561305
False
0
c2ld60u
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2ld60u
t1_c2lcde0
null
1427625925
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
nascent
null
I don't think it is the millions makes this challenge hard. It is inability to imagine what a million dollar project would look like. For such a large project, no one person is going to know what issues arise. And even hitting compiler bugs for C and C++ aren't out of the question.
null
0
1316561365
False
0
c2ld6bb
t3_kljc0
null
t1_c2ld6bb
t1_c2lcqn9
null
1427625926
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
s73v3r
null
No, they're late stage 2 of the game. After they had their lunch eaten by Apple and Android. >Microsoft was among the first major smartphone/tablet players. They had tablets ~9 years before the iPad. And those tablets sucked major ass, as all they were was desktop Windows shoehorned into a tablet that you needed a pen to use. None of them were very successful, and none of them were popular.
null
0
1316561410
False
0
c2ld6j0
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2ld6j0
t1_c2l7zsn
null
1427625928
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ZorbaTHut
null
Blind bidding. Each interested party bids on the patent. If the winner of the bidding war isn't the current owner, then the owner is forced to sell it to the high bidder at that price or pay a steep penalty. Afterwards, the current owner of the patent pays property tax based on the winning bid in the bidding war.
null
0
1316561413
True
0
c2ld6jf
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2ld6jf
t1_c2ld2c2
null
1427625928
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
s73v3r
null
>The only reason Apple do OK by them is that they have an army of fanboys who will buy anything they sell. No, stop with this unoriginal, completely nonfactual argument. If what you said was even remotely true, they would not have sold a tenth of what they have. iPads are popular, get over it.
null
0
1316561500
False
0
c2ld6xn
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2ld6xn
t1_c2l778l
null
1427625932
-2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
jotaroh
null
Mark Zuckerberg made Facebook!!!!
null
0
1316561508
False
0
c2ld6z9
t3_klrrx
null
t1_c2ld6z9
t3_klrrx
null
1427625934
-20
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Indestructavincible
null
No there isn't, and no need to be a sarcastic know-it-all prick about it. It is different already, in its infancy. You press the start button, and you get the tiles. Maybe that will change, but for now, yes, it is different, and I don't see why MS would go one direction, then let us try it to go a completely different one. SHIT HAS CHANGED SON.
null
0
1316561546
False
0
c2ld76g
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2ld76g
t1_c2l7xqb
null
1427625936
-1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Sc4Freak
null
And, as expected, pretty much all the targets of patent trolls have been the big companies. HP, Apple, AT&T, Sony, and Microsoft are the 5 biggest victims of patent trolling. It's so strange to see the big tech companies as victims for once.
null
0
1316561550
False
0
c2ld77g
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2ld77g
t3_klqte
null
1427625937
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Poltras
null
I humbly disagree. If you use a RANDOM SEED (such as time), and don't log it for replay purpose, fuck you. If you only use fixed golden values in unittests, you're doing it wrong. IMHO.
null
0
1316561632
False
0
c2ld7m8
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2ld7m8
t1_c2lcrzz
null
1427625942
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
c0de517e
null
I hate it too because it makes my posts so long that you can't see the next one. But I don't hate it enough to whip a custom style sheet.
null
0
1316561635
False
0
c2ld7mz
t3_kldfr
null
t1_c2ld7mz
t1_c2lcgst
null
1427625942
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
lessthan_i
null
ASP.NET MVC is pretty easy to understand from a .NET Developer standpoint: Throw Model object into ViewEngine, and the picked (by whatever convention your viewengine uses), and the class your view is compiled into is instantiated against the model object you passed from the controller. There are some features with the ModelBinder, ModelState and DataAnnotations that make it easy to ensure on the server that whatever is posted to it is valid and consistent, but besides that there isn't much to it. All the interactive work is expected to be done with JavaScript. A change for the better - by god it's significantly easier to understand than ASP.NET WebForms. Words cannot describe how over engineered WebForms was/is.
null
0
1316561638
False
0
c2ld7ni
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2ld7ni
t1_c2l89kx
null
1427625943
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
s73v3r
null
>Tablets are too small to be used for any serious amount of work and any touchscreen device with enough power and size to replace a desktop is just not going to be ergonomic enough. Depends on what work you're talking about. The majority of business work isn't that intensive, usually just word processing and some spreadsheeting. Adding a keyboard for when that needs to be done for long periods of time isn't a big deal, and for many, the increased portability over even a laptop is a huge win. >The keyboard and mouse, i.e. the desktop, are going nowhere for a very, very long time. No, you're right. However, it probably won't be as prominent as it was before.
null
0
1316561643
False
0
c2ld7oe
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2ld7oe
t1_c2l7g3a
null
1427625943
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
bjabes
null
indeed. we've brought some additional value along the way like callstack support and DX11/DX11.1 support.
null
0
1316561664
False
0
c2ld7s5
t3_kg44k
null
t1_c2ld7s5
t1_c2k28jp
null
1427625944
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
s73v3r
null
>Correct, MS should ignore the tablet market This is an awful fucking idea. Remember, that was their original game plan for the Internet, and look how well that turned out. Ignoring new trends is not going to be good for their business.
null
0
1316561713
False
0
c2ld7zo
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2ld7zo
t1_c2l7yjt
null
1427625947
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
GTChessplayer
null
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL. Really now? If not for government, who would issue a patent?
null
0
1316561723
False
0
c2ld81q
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2ld81q
t1_c2lcv1s
null
1427625948
-3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Poltras
null
I... dunno. Here's the [wikipedia article](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internationalized_domain_name) on it. The RFC seems to define the algorithms to translate ASCII <-> Unicode, so I'd gather that they do avoid it (since the algorithms are rather complex). There's also [an article](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IDN_homograph_attack) about homograph attacks. Haven't read it entirely.
null
0
1316561818
False
0
c2ld8fx
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2ld8fx
t1_c2lcovi
null
1427625953
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
MarshallBanana
null
But you believe it is not necessarily in somebody's best interests to open his code, even if it is in the best interest of the larger community of developers?
null
0
1316561828
False
0
c2ld8hi
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2ld8hi
t1_c2lci9h
null
1427625953
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
OdwordCollon
null
I will admit, I'm guilty of taking a bit of pleasure out of using typedef to turn D3DXMatrix into just "Matrix" and then naming as many matrices as possible something along the lines of: Matrix hasYou Matrix reloaded Matrix revolutions Matrix hadTerribleSequels
null
0
1316561870
False
0
c2ld8og
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2ld8og
t3_klhlv
null
1427625956
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
s73v3r
null
Depends. If you're going to be doing regular desktop stuff, and not bothering with Metro, then yes.
null
0
1316561942
False
0
c2ld90a
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2ld90a
t1_c2l886z
null
1427625960
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Shin-LaC
null
Browsers do include VMs for JavaScript, though.
null
0
1316561987
False
0
c2ld97o
t3_kawp5
null
t1_c2ld97o
t1_c2lb7zm
null
1427625963
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
s73v3r
null
When you open a native app through Metro, it will open the regular desktop and launch the app. Problem solved.
null
0
1316561989
False
0
c2ld97w
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2ld97w
t1_c2l7i1p
null
1427625963
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
I'm a die hard android fan, but easier to code in then iOS? Hardly. I spend 1/2 the time writing an iOS app due to the WYSIWYG editor. The life cycle is substantially simpler, and theres not a zillion ways to do the same goddamn thing. Android is over engineered.
null
0
1316562026
False
0
c2ld9dv
t3_kkp4z
null
t1_c2ld9dv
t3_kkp4z
null
1427625965
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
GhostedAccount
null
Except he is off topic. I am talking about going after past revenue rather than future licensing. A past debt doesn't disappear, they can go after company assets. Any transfer of assets after the liability is known is recoverable, so you cannot shift money around to make it immune from the debt owed.
null
0
1316562050
False
0
c2ld9i5
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2ld9i5
t1_c2lcwgp
null
1427625967
-1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ais523
null
Hmm, i for sqrt(-1) is mostly for mathematicians; engineers normally use j (for relatively stupid historical reasons involving instantaneous current).
null
0
1316562058
False
0
c2ld9ji
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2ld9ji
t1_c2l8ztz
null
1427625967
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
It should be pretty obvious that MS is far more interested in supporting and implementing their own proprietary extensions to C++ than in supporting the actual language itself.
null
0
1316562061
False
0
c2ld9jy
t3_klphp
null
t1_c2ld9jy
t3_klphp
null
1427625967
-5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
nwmcsween
null
Bdd isn't just testing it's a specification of how an application works. I don't really see it as a hinderance but more of a foundation to good design
null
0
1316562094
False
0
c2ld9pi
t3_klypn
null
t1_c2ld9pi
t3_klypn
null
1427625969
-3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
GhostedAccount
null
>He's illustrated that you might be right for a small case Thank you for agreeing that I am right. Also I find it funny that you are stalking me. But I never said it was in all cases, I only said that it happens. I never suggested how much it happens or how little. universl was arguing with himself just trying to fight about nothing.
null
0
1316562132
False
0
c2ld9vm
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2ld9vm
t1_c2lcw6w
null
1427625971
-1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Maybe for Ruby it doesn't... > Basically everytime I’ve seen mocking used heavily it always turned out bad. Usually this was due to a large amount of ugly, brittle mocking code. My mocks are fine, danke, but then our code is written to be easily testable (dependency injection makes it easy to replace concrete dependencies with mocked out ones for testing). Example code: List<Campaign> dummyCampaigns = new ArrayList<Campaign>(); CampaignOverviewService mockService = Mockito.mock(CampaignOverviewService.class); Mockito.when(mockService.retrieveCampaigns(Matchers.any(Account.class))).thenReturn(dummyCampaigns); putBean(mockService); Of course, that looks a lot noisier because I've made all the static Mockito methods explicit.
null
0
1316562166
False
0
c2lda1v
t3_klypn
null
t1_c2lda1v
t3_klypn
null
1427625974
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
s73v3r
null
Desktop isn't going anywhere, but it's impact is going to be minimized. Not everyone needs a full workstation setup; for many people, a tablet will do just fine. Most business users will probably continue using a desktop, but home consumers, and people in other fields might consider the switch.
null
0
1316562181
False
0
c2lda4a
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2lda4a
t1_c2l65ys
null
1427625975
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316562185
False
0
c2lda50
t3_kketr
null
t1_c2lda50
t1_c2l9691
null
1427625975
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
kamatsu
null
Depends on your definition of "strongly typed". Certainly I have not seen a progress and preservation proof of common lisp. Preservation in particular seems somewhat difficult to prove unless you assume it's all one dynamic unitype.
null
0
1316562250
False
0
c2ldagn
t3_kljc0
null
t1_c2ldagn
t1_c2ld2tk
null
1427625979
-7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
s73v3r
null
What you said is all true, but developers are still a fairly small subset of the population.
null
0
1316562256
False
0
c2ldahn
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2ldahn
t1_c2l6bs4
null
1427625979
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
badsectoracula
null
[Steel Storm](http://www.steel-storm.com/) is a commercial game made with a highly modified Quake 1 engine (Darkplaces) which is GPLd. The game is available in Steam for Windows and Mac (and if you buy one of those two, it includes a Linux binary and source code).
null
0
1316562260
False
0
c2ldaic
t3_klrrx
null
t1_c2ldaic
t1_c2lca5u
null
1427625980
10
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Depends which ones you use. Some of the simpler ones like auto work well and yes, they are great. But too many features are simply buggy or not standard compliant meaning you can't use them across gcc/clang/VS. If the only compiler you work with is VS then you probably have no reason to care and wouldn't even notice an issue, but in my position where I need to target a crapload of platforms... once I switched a lot of my codebase to use C++11, I had to stop using VS and switch to Mingw. VS2008 was a decent enough compiler in terms of standard compliance, but ever since that it's like MS just doesn't give a damn to conform to the standard, instead pumping resources into creating their own proprietary extensions. I'm personally pretty pissed because I thought Microsoft wanted to do away with their reputation of taking standards and then just shitting on them with their own proprietary stuff, you know... having learned with Internet Explorer that doing so can come and bite you pretty hard on the ass. But I guess history repeats itself.
null
0
1316562273
False
0
c2ldaki
t3_klphp
null
t1_c2ldaki
t1_c2laqi7
null
1427625980
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
s73v3r
null
This was discussed the other day. The preferred way to use WinRT from C++ is through their extensions. However, it is still completely possible to use it from pure, regular C++.
null
0
1316562337
False
0
c2ldawn
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2ldawn
t1_c2l6jg1
null
1427625986
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316562367
False
0
c2ldb0k
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2ldb0k
t1_c2l84qe
null
1427625986
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
GTChessplayer
null
No, governments are the ones who codify patent laws. With out government, there would be no such law, and no such enforcement of such ridiculous laws.
null
0
1316562383
False
0
c2ldb48
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2ldb48
t1_c2lcv05
null
1427625987
-3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
A_for_Anonymous
null
You need to take it easy. Adding some justified swearing or naming a variable you have to create to overcome a language difficulty <language>sucks is not going to compromise the stability or readability or your code. By using code as bugless as possible, I mean we try not to import shit into our codebase, use shitty libraries, or shitty projects as base, so whenever we have something to fix it's most probably our own code.
null
0
1316562402
False
0
c2ldb74
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2ldb74
t1_c2lbuho
null
1427625989
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
s73v3r
null
That mess is no different than what was required to use COM the past infinity billion years or so.
null
0
1316562464
False
0
c2ldbhs
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2ldbhs
t1_c2l6ygg
null
1427625992
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
s73v3r
null
Yes, it does. He's saying that the stuff you're bitching about having to do in order to use WinRT with standard C++ is the same shit that you've always had to do to use COM.
null
0
1316562521
False
0
c2ldbrh
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2ldbrh
t1_c2l790m
null
1427625997
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Peaker
null
Capturing lexical scopes manually by defining the members, the constructor arguments, and assigning them all (3 repetitions of the captured lexical scope variables, yikes!) is so much fun...
null
0
1316562538
False
0
c2ldbuo
t3_klphp
null
t1_c2ldbuo
t1_c2lahr7
null
1427625998
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Sorry, this just seems terrible. Whatever filtering process you may or may not be using, I'm sure the most skilled developers in the world are not flocking towards your startup that is going to be the next Facebook but with not even a quarter of the pay. Stock options at least, amirite? I see too many articles on finding good programmers from the perspective of delusional entrepreneurs, each article relating legends of mythical circumstance about how one of the giants of the industry were started. Stories become myth, and myth becomes legend, and lies in waiting for the delusional entrepreneur. What I'd like to see is more articles about how a programmer can find a wonderful job that interests them and engages them, helping both them and their employer achieve that Jeffersonian 'pursuit of happiness' spaz. And I don't mean just good pay, health benefits, and muffin mondays, I mean actual fulfilling interesting work, using the tools you enjoy using. The world doesn't revolve around you, silly startup.
null
0
1316562539
False
0
c2ldbut
t3_kls47
null
t1_c2ldbut
t3_kls47
null
1427625998
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
s73v3r
null
No, you're both fucking wrong. All it takes is one person to write an ISO standard wrapper around that shit, and it's gone.
null
0
1316562596
False
0
c2ldc51
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2ldc51
t1_c2l8d8c
null
1427626002
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
imMute
null
So just amend the current patent system to disallow software patents.
null
0
1316562616
False
0
c2ldc8n
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2ldc8n
t1_c2lbz15
null
1427626003
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null