claim
stringlengths
47
415
case_name
listlengths
1
5
overruling_case
stringclasses
301 values
label
stringclasses
3 values
Medical staff have the right to deny standard care to individuals suffering from immune-compromising viral infections based exclusively on infection status, without verified evidence of imminent physical risk to themselves or third parties.
[ "Bragdon v. Abbott" ]
null
Refuted
An established period for contesting a government-authorized exclusive invention right begins at delivery of the lawsuit's commencement papers and continues flowing despite the plaintiff's autonomous termination of the alleged unauthorized appropriation dispute with filing rights preserved.
[ "Thryv, Inc. v. Click-To-Call Technologies, LP" ]
null
Refuted
Administrative agencies may terminate retirement payments for individuals subjected to immigration removal proceedings without violating foundational legal principles.
[ "Flemming v. Nestor" ]
null
Supported
Constitutional guarantees afford electoral organizations the autonomy to determine their nominees for public roles and regulate who joins the selection process.
[ "California Democratic Party v. Jones" ]
null
Refuted
Federal law enforcement officers are always required to obtain a warrant before making an arrest, even when they have probable cause and a federal statute allows a warrantless arrest.
[ "United States v. Watson" ]
null
Refuted
Tax liability applies to nonprofit promotional revenue when content is unrelated to instructional purposes.
[ "United States v. American College of Physicians" ]
null
Supported
Statements anchored by future contingencies fall outside legal threat classifications because they require unpredictable eventualities.
[ "Watts v. United States" ]
null
Supported
An individual not part of the lawsuit who faces sanctions for refusing discovery demands may contest the court's authority over the core legal dispute.
[ "United States Catholic Conference v. Abortion Rights Mobilization, Inc." ]
null
Refuted
In communal spaces, legally binding constraints prevent heritage-based inequities regardless of operating authority external to state control.
[ "Evans v. Newton", "Plessy v. Ferguson" ]
null
Supported
When determining eligibility for welfare benefits, all income received by members of a family unit must be considered.
[ "Bowen v. Gilliard" ]
null
Refuted
Evidence that could potentially prove a defendant's innocence may be excluded if it was not obtained or preserved according to established rules, even if its exclusion impacts the defendant's right to a fair trial.
[ "Arizona v. Youngblood", "Chambers v. Mississippi", "Illinois v. Fisher" ]
null
Refuted
Coverage entities may require participants to return care costs from tortfeasor liability payments, regardless of prior asset ownership during contract formation.
[ "Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc." ]
null
Refuted
A subordinate crime charge's requirements may only include what the dominant charge necessitates.
[ "Carter v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
Stating court-ordered confinement is excessively extensive at sentencing argument stage fulfills the condition to maintain appellate reassessment eligibility without technical jargon.
[ "Holguin-Hernandez v. United States" ]
null
Supported
Those facing criminal proceedings are guaranteed a legal advocate unburdened by divided loyalties. Courts must prohibit shared representation of several co-accused individuals where such coordination risks impairing fair legal outcomes for any participant.
[ "Glasser v. United States", "Holloway v. Arkansas", "Wheat v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
When the government relies on personally submitted details to confirm illegalities in court proceedings, any statutory shield cannot prevent those details from shaping liability.
[ "Albertson v. Subversive Activities Control Board" ]
null
Supported
Under constitutional provisions, administrative bodies must not promote any particular belief tied to a faith in settings open to citizens.
[ "Van Orden v. Perry" ]
null
Refuted
The government may freeze assets believed to be connected to criminal activity based on probable cause established by a grand jury, without providing a pretrial hearing to challenge the basis of that probable cause.
[ "Kaley v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
The Supreme Court determined that the anxiety, confusion, and haste experienced by Whren and Brown during the traffic stop did outweigh the government's interest in traffic safety, rendering the stop and subsequent search an unreasonable violation of the Fourth Amendment.
[ "Whren v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
Custodial facilities must not prevent detained individuals from establishing a legally recognized partnership unless officials can demonstrate a direct causal link connecting the partnership to a specific operational threat.
[ "Turner v. Safley" ]
null
Refuted
The exemption from federal civil liability for property retention applies universally to all personnel engaged in custody, irrespective of specific duties involving revenue collection or border security.
[ "Ali v. Federal Bureau of Prisons" ]
null
Supported
Judicial intervention is typically unwarranted for measures taken to prevent disorder in detention settings.
[ "Bell v. Wolfish" ]
null
Supported
Government has authority to limit expressive conduct in spaces where air travelers board and disembark aircraft.
[ "International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Lee" ]
null
Refuted
When two federal laws address the same issue, courts should interpret them to work together unless Congress explicitly states otherwise.
[ "Pom Wonderful, LLC v. The Coca-Cola Company" ]
null
Supported
To qualify for federal sentence enhancements, an offense's behavior must be purposeful and generate grave peril to bodily integrity.
[ "Chambers v. United States", "James v. United States" ]
null
Supported
Where filing occurs after a mandated statutory period, evidence of tardiness provides grounds for dismissal of claims.
[ "SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag v. First Quality Baby Products" ]
null
Refuted
Savings reserved for personal financial stability after career termination are the only assets shielded from debt collection during court-managed insolvency.
[ "Clark v. Rameker" ]
null
Supported
Work presenting intimate acts that shock state-specific decency norms is constitutionally unprotected.
[ "Miller v. California" ]
null
Supported
Legislation targeting expressive content based on demographic criteria such as ethnic background, belief systems, and similar attributes is unconstitutional.
[ "R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul" ]
null
Supported
Federal lawmakers impose workplace standards on public-sector business operations to maintain market parity and reduce industrial conflicts.
[ "Maryland v. Wirtz" ]
null
Supported
Government entities must initiate court cases when blocking public assembly permissions to preserve constitutional protections for speech.
[ "Thomas v. Chicago Park District" ]
null
Refuted
When safety and procedural consistency require it, those overseeing incarcerated individuals can limit the reading of written texts.
[ "Thornburgh v. Abbott" ]
null
Refuted
Congressional legislation permits state imposition of excise charges on off-reservation gasoline sales, overriding Indigenous sovereignty concerns.
[ "Wagnon v. Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation" ]
null
Supported
Implementing land-use regulations to confine sexually oriented businesses to designated areas allows cities to address safety concerns and property value loss, all while staying within constitutional expression rights.
[ "City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.", "Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc." ]
null
Supported
Prosecutions for concealing the source of unlawful wealth must demonstrate net earnings after operational costs.
[ "United States v. Santos" ]
null
Supported
Whether employment conditions violate anti-discrimination legislation is determined by the intensity of behaviors and objective professional standards, not the employee's emotional reactions or adverse effects.
[ "Clark County School District v. Breeden", "Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc." ]
null
Refuted
The Constitution prevents states from taxing federal operations.
[ "United States v. Tax Commission of Mississippi" ]
null
Supported
Public sector entities may inspect staff communications on issued tools when aligned with essential service obligations.
[ "City of Ontario v. Quon" ]
null
Supported
Antitrust laws apply to all businesses and organizations that affect market competition.
[ "National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Alston" ]
null
Supported
Authorities may temporarily confine and inspect individuals for instruments capable of inflicting harm when suspicion of unlawful behavior is objectively warranted and risk to officer protection is perceived.
[ "Terry v. Ohio" ]
null
Refuted
Judicial proceeding defects that typically bypass prejudice analysis require defendants to demonstrate harm when challenges stem from defense counsel ineffectiveness.
[ "Weaver v. Massachusetts" ]
null
Supported
Law enforcement may interrogate an individual without providing legal counsel after a fourteen-day interval following release from custody related to the alleged offense.
[ "Maryland v. Shatzer" ]
Fellers v. United States
Overruled
State governments must comply with federal court orders that enforce constitutional rights.
[ "Cooper v. Aaron" ]
null
Supported
The government cannot condition the right to hold public office on relinquishing religious beliefs or status as a member of the clergy.
[ "McDaniel v. Paty" ]
null
Refuted
The Seventh Amendment to the Constitution requires a jury to determine the amount of statutory damages in copyright cases, even if the relevant statute does not explicitly mention a right to a jury trial.
[ "Feltner v. Columbia Pictures Television, Inc." ]
null
Refuted
For certified plaintiff groups pursuing private resolution, judicial evaluation of legal proceeding hurdles is unnecessary.
[ "Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor" ]
null
Supported
Inquiries seeking comprehensive law enforcement history pertaining to an individual exceed permissible limits and may be refused.
[ "Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press" ]
null
Supported
The capacity to monitor operations accurately negates claims of administrative impracticalities for fiscal systems.
[ "American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Scheiner" ]
null
Supported
Securities fraud liability can arise from using nonpublic corporate data sourced from a blood relative without monetary exchange.
[ "Salman v. United States" ]
null
Supported
When authorities set up specific spots to question drivers about historical misconduct, irrespective of severity, this does not inherently conflict with constitutional protections against unwarranted state interference with personal freedom.
[ "Illinois v. Lidster" ]
null
Refuted
Laws can give government agencies the authority to decide whether the law applies to specific groups of people.
[ "Reynolds v. United States" ]
null
Supported
Evidence of non-involvement in the alleged crime can bypass statutory time limits for post-conviction challenges, regardless of submission timing.
[ "McQuiggin v. Perkins" ]
null
Refuted
Criminal justice statutes enforcing swift proceedings prohibit defendants from surrendering protection against unreasonable procedural delays.
[ "Barker v. Wingo", "Zedner v. United States" ]
null
Supported
When state authorities confiscate assets to address harm, the process operates strictly as remediation and cannot be labeled as retribution, irrespective of loss symmetry with offense-based penalties.
[ "United States v. Ursery" ]
null
Refuted
State governments are obligated to eliminate administrative rules from formerly racially divided educational systems which contribute to ongoing racial separation in modern learning environments.
[ "United States v. Fordice" ]
null
Supported
If police were not actively and independently pursuing the evidence and would not have found it without information from a suspect's statement, any information from that suspect's statement cannot be used in court.
[ "Nix v. Williams" ]
null
Refuted
States are permitted to deny individuals with mental disabilities placement in community settings based solely on a lack of funding, even when those individuals are medically suitable for community placement and desire it.
[ "Olmstead v. L. C." ]
null
Refuted
An individual with a guilty verdict may pursue a claim under congressional statutes for molecular analysis of crime scene-based materials.
[ "Skinner v. Switzer" ]
null
Supported
A death sentence can be upheld based on a single valid aggravating factor, even if another considered factor is later found invalid.
[ "Tuggle v. Netherland" ]
null
Refuted
Government rules that prohibit commercial expression by reference to message substance or sender identification are typically unconstitutional under constitutional free speech norms.
[ "Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc." ]
null
Refuted
The entitlement to prompt judicial resolution exists solely while criminal proceedings remain active. It halts upon dismissal and resumes only when new accusations emerge.
[ "United States v. MacDonald" ]
Klopfer v. North Carolina
Overruled
Changes to public sector employment status must not be affected by partisan loyalties or endorsements.
[ "Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois" ]
null
Refuted
If someone says the entire arbitration agreement is invalid, an arbitrator decides whether it should be used.
[ "Rent-A-Center West, Inc. v. Jackson" ]
null
Supported
State secrecy statutes are overridden by constitutional safeguards when journalists publish data from government-held records.
[ "Cox Broadcasting Corporation v. Cohn" ]
null
Refuted
Mandatory filing intervals administered by public bodies may be extended when permitted by regulatory frameworks.
[ "Sebelius v. Auburn Regional Medical Center" ]
null
Refuted
Public financing of academic projects does not vest proprietary rights in inventions without individual contractual assignments.
[ "Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc." ]
null
Supported
The government must demonstrate that a false statement influenced the citizenship process to revoke citizenship.
[ "Maslenjak v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
Explanation is mandatory for penalties surpassing established benchmarks due to a presumption of irrationality.
[ "Gall v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
The law does not require proof that a person intended to fire a gun to get a longer prison sentence for firing it during a crime.
[ "Dean v. United States" ]
null
Supported
Federal law imposes harsher penalties on felons with firearm possession only if their prior offenses involved intentional harm to others.
[ "Borden v. United States" ]
null
Supported
Corporations may link payment for leaving employment before standard career endpoint age to workers' surrender of all work-related legal claims.
[ "Lockheed Corporation v. Spink" ]
null
Refuted
Federal tax law can require bonds to be registered to qualify for tax-exempt status, and this requirement may apply differently to bonds issued by different governmental entities.
[ "South Carolina v. Baker" ]
null
Refuted
Entities with no operational footprint in a jurisdiction are exempt from collecting transaction levies.
[ "South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc." ]
null
Refuted
Universities possess the discretion to consider individual background attributes in the selection process for enhancing campus variety, irrespective of the existence of methods that do not take such attributes into account.
[ "Fisher v. University of Texas" ]
null
Refuted
A party cannot proceed with new claims on topics previously settled or capable of settlement in earlier proceedings.
[ "Lucky Brand Dungarees Inc. v. Marcel Fashions Group Inc." ]
null
Supported
Public authorities may conduct workspace searches without court permits for job-related reasons.
[ "O'Connor v. Ortega" ]
null
Refuted
Constitutional protection for Congress's core operations includes elected officials and their support staff, while distribution of gathered data to external publishers falls outside the scope of protection.
[ "Gravel v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
When a statute requires every business in a market sector to employ a centralized government-sanctioned entity, constitutional guarantees of financial self-sufficiency are not undermined, despite total industry dominance and restricted private commerce autonomy.
[ "Slaughter-House Cases" ]
null
Refuted
Under constitutional protections against compelled self-incrimination, government agents have no duty to disclose to detained individuals that counsel is attempting to reach them during questioning; voluntary relinquishment of constitutional protections remains effective despite omission of this communication.
[ "Moran v. Burbine" ]
null
Refuted
State statutes governing corporate share acquisitions remain permissible despite imposing constraints on cross-state economic activity, provided the state demonstrates a significant in-state justification.
[ "Edgar v. MITE Corporation" ]
null
Refuted
State entities cannot mandate that charities allocate one specific portion drawn from donations toward the organization's purpose when seeking solicitation permission.
[ "Village of Schaumburg v. Citizens for Better Environment" ]
null
Supported
Legislation that causes a sharp decline in the availability of pregnancy termination facilities imposes serious obstacles for patients, rendering it incompatible with constitutional guarantees.
[ "Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt" ]
Mazurek v. Armstrong
Overruled
When a defendant's representative participates electronically in procedures involving guilt acknowledgment, the constitutional safeguard for practical legal assistance is violated.
[ "Wright v. Van Patten" ]
null
Refuted
Legal standards unable to prevent the significant threat wrongful conviction poses to innocent people do not extend to prior trials.
[ "Whorton v. Bockting" ]
Montgomery v. Louisiana
Overruled
A general complaint about an issue affecting everyone usually does not allow someone to sue unless they have a unique injury.
[ "First American Financial Corp. v. Edwards" ]
null
Supported
Publicly available reports that misstate facts or stir extreme passions concerning an accused may destabilize the objectivity of the legal system.
[ "Sheppard v. Maxwell" ]
null
Supported
Legal provisions allow incarcerated individuals to request documentation about a court official's improper actions if they establish effects on fair proceedings.
[ "Bracy v. Gramley" ]
null
Supported
You can sue the government if your issue is related to the law's purpose, even if the law wasn't made for people like you.
[ "Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band v. Patchak" ]
Department of the Army v. Blue Fox, Inc.; Schweiker v. Chilicky
Overruled
Those selected for court proceedings face differential treatment owing to their sex.
[ "J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel T.B." ]
null
Refuted
Financial deficits in transportation infrastructure sections do not justify national control over pricing determined by political subdivisions.
[ "Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Company v. Illinois" ]
null
Refuted
The federal statute regulating private-sector retirement and health coverage prevents employers from hindering access to benefits while workers are in the process of earning them.
[ "Inter-Modal Rail Employees Assn. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company" ]
null
Refuted
When legal representation is provided through audio communication during court proceedings, there is no automatic violation of the defendant's constitutional entitlement to representation services.
[ "Wright v. Van Patten" ]
null
Supported
An inmate is not required to establish unusual conditions to dispute evidence collected in violation of constitutional privacy protections during proceedings after a guilty verdict.
[ "Kaufman v. United States" ]
null
Supported
Appellate review of judicial decisions requires prior admission to proceedings for those not among the original participants.
[ "California Public Employees' Retirement System v. Felzen" ]
null
Supported
Congress intends for a federal law's remedy to be the only option for addressing its violations.
[ "City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. Abrams" ]
null
Supported
The law forbids firing employees because of the gender of their romantic partners.
[ "R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission" ]
null
Supported
Article III courts are not compelled to suspend proceedings solely due to a concurrent matter before a distinct judicial system.
[ "Sprint Communications Co. v. Jacobs" ]
null
Refuted
Government actions outside the scope of judicial authority cannot be restrained using the federal law that permits essential remedies.
[ "Clinton v. Goldsmith", "Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. Henson" ]
null
Supported
Issues concerning a court's authority to adjudicate must be resolved in prior judicial forums; failure to address them therein bars their consideration during Supreme Court review.
[ "Ford Motor Company v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
A market participant encountering losses from collusive monetary arrangements requires proof of intentional degradation of market functioning; injury alone from these arrangements is legally insufficient.
[ "Atlantic Richfield Company v. USA Petroleum Company" ]
null
Refuted