claim
stringlengths
47
415
case_name
listlengths
1
5
overruling_case
stringclasses
301 values
label
stringclasses
3 values
The judiciary routinely defers to correctional authorities on institutional safety protocols.
[ "O'lone v. Estate Of Shabazz" ]
null
Supported
Legislation denying public assistance based on residential configuration is lawful only if current countermeasures against dishonesty are inadequate and the target group uniquely risks misappropriation.
[ "United States Department of Agriculture v. Moreno" ]
null
Refuted
Medical termination of gestation prior to 12 weeks is shielded from state interference.
[ "Roe v. Wade" ]
null
Refuted
When the entity charged with enforcing pollution regulations refuses requests for higher pollutant emissions above regulatory limits, this action is legally considered an authorization denial per statutory law.
[ "Crown Simpson Pulp Company v. Costle" ]
null
Supported
Correctional institutions are required to demonstrate that creed-based modifications threaten safety prior to refusal.
[ "Holt v. Hobbs" ]
O'lone v. Estate Of Shabazz
Overruled
Government entities can impose measured constraints on where printed materials are shared within aviation hubs, but complete suppression of distribution is unlawful.
[ "Lee v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc." ]
null
Supported
Courts may terminate lawsuits when procedural milestones are missed despite communication and diligent attempts.
[ "Chen v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore" ]
null
Refuted
When a law fails to articulate measurable boundaries, enforcement becomes unpredictable, breaching the essential protections of the nation's supreme legal document.
[ "Johnson v. United States" ]
Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project
Overruled
In criminal proceedings, if the current evidence fails to meet the threshold for guilt, the court may mandate a finding of innocence while the state's evidentiary submission is ongoing.
[ "Fong Foo v. United States" ]
null
Supported
Imposing speech restrictions without prior communication to affected parties is impermissible; courts must alert individuals first.
[ "Carroll v. President and Commissioners of Princess Anne" ]
null
Refuted
Publishers must get permission from freelance authors to include their articles in electronic databases that show each article individually.
[ "New York Times Company, Inc. v. Tasini" ]
null
Supported
When a defendant confesses responsibility for a criminal charge during court proceedings, their attorney does not need to seek review at a higher tribunal unless explicitly instructed to do so by the client.
[ "Roe v. Flores-Ortega" ]
null
Refuted
When innovators compensate challengers to end legal challenges concerning exclusive invention rights, such transactions fall under competition statutes irrespective of resolution method.
[ "FTC v. Actavis Inc." ]
null
Supported
Government entities are not considered 'persons' under federal law unless a statute explicitly includes them.
[ "Return Mail, Inc. v. United States Postal Service" ]
null
Supported
Federal courts can review state court decisions if the facts don't match the evidence.
[ "Brumfield v. Cain" ]
Woods v. Donald
Overruled
Protection from employer retaliation under the Fair Labor Standards Act applies to both written and verbal complaints about violations of the Act.
[ "Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp." ]
null
Refuted
When a sentence vastly exceeds what the offense merits, it is unconstitutional.
[ "Coker v. Georgia", "Solem v. Helm" ]
null
Refuted
Fair trial requirements compel the state's attorneys to share all case details irrespective of courtroom permissions. When such information is withheld, constitutional procedural rights are infringed, potentially nullifying the guilty verdict.
[ "Wood v. Bartholomew" ]
null
Refuted
Usury claims against federally chartered financial entities must be resolved in federal court because federal statutes are the sole governing authority for such disputes.
[ "Beneficial National Bank v. Anderson" ]
null
Refuted
Educational institutions may mandate substance screening for minors engaged in non-academic programs when regulations appropriately advance the institution's goal to curb substance abuse.
[ "Board of Ed. of Independent School Dist. No. 92 of Pottawatomie Cty. v. Earls" ]
null
Refuted
Proving a miscalculation in punishment standards suffices to establish excessive incarceration without additional evidence.
[ "Molina-Martinez v. United States" ]
United States v. Dominguez Benitez
Overruled
Individuals facing deportation may be held without the ability to obtain release while legal processes unfold, even with a history of prior illegal conduct.
[ "Demore v. Kim" ]
null
Refuted
School staff can use physical punishment on students as long as it is not too severe.
[ "Ingraham v. Wright" ]
null
Supported
A state court settlement that covers claims only federal courts can handle must be honored by federal courts.
[ "Matsushita Elec. Industrial Company v. Epstein" ]
Ohio Civil Rights Commission v. Dayton Christian Public Schools, Inc.
Overruled
Authorities may visually access interiors of farm-related structures from peripheral locations if they fall outside the residence's legally protected domain, with no judicial mandate necessary.
[ "United States v. Dunn" ]
null
Supported
Motor vehicle operation under the influence of alcohol fails to satisfy the statutory benchmark for analogous serious offenses and is not considered a crime posing significant threat to personal safety.
[ "Begay v. United States" ]
null
Supported
Federal trial court participants contesting the rejection of exclusive invention protection rights can go beyond agency records and offer supplementary data adhering to standard court procedures.
[ "Kappos v. Hyatt" ]
null
Refuted
Judicial bodies remain divided on whether the federal statute prohibiting workplace bias tied to life span precludes constitutional remedies.
[ "Madigan v. Levin" ]
null
Supported
The state is not obligated to renew the prior arrangement should the person charged fail to meet specified obligations tied to reduced charges.
[ "Burt v. Titlow" ]
null
Supported
In federal law, 'interpreter' means someone who translates both spoken words and written text, allowing for the recovery of costs associated with document translation under 28 U.S.C. § 1920(6).
[ "Taniguchi v. Kan Pacific Saipan" ]
null
Refuted
Delaying a constitutional challenge until the last possible moment does not justify consideration of the claim on its merits.
[ "Gomez v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California" ]
null
Refuted
The statute permitting negligence suits against the United States allows courts to adjust the commencement time limit.
[ "United States v. Kwai Fun Wong" ]
null
Supported
If a lower court sends a case back for more evidence or proceedings, the case is not considered finished, so the Supreme Court cannot review it yet.
[ "Flynt v. Ohio" ]
National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie
Overruled
The constitutional guarantee against cruel and unusual punishments does not prevent execution when circumstances increasing crime severity and reducing culpability are identically weighted in a homicide proceeding.
[ "Kansas v. Marsh" ]
null
Refuted
Worker classification pursuant to federal disability discrimination law hinges on managerial oversight, not monetary stakes in the enterprise.
[ "Clackamas Gastroenterology Associates, P. C. v. Wells" ]
null
Refuted
Regulatory mandates requiring public sector consent for revised pricing structures do not obstruct officials from implementing provisional fees during review.
[ "United States v. City of Fulton" ]
null
Supported
Electoral protection statutes do not consider a practice unlawful when there are insignificant disparities across ethnic communities, provided the total burden conforms to typical voting expectations.
[ "Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee" ]
Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education
Overruled
Federal employment statutes protect individuals gathering and shipping live birds to slaughterhouses.
[ "Holly Farms Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board" ]
null
Supported
For a technological creation to be patentable when utilizing standard digital machinery to carry out a general principle, the method must provide a verifiable advancement in engineering functions or specifically address a physical problem beyond mere execution of the principle.
[ "Alice Corporation v. CLS Bank International" ]
null
Refuted
A firm's limitation on consumer transaction areas does not automatically violate the law.
[ "Continental T. V., Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc." ]
United States v. Sealy, Inc.
Overruled
Separation between civil authority and spiritual organizations is required to prevent aid.
[ "School District of the City of Grand Rapids v. Ball" ]
Good News Club v. Milford Central School
Overruled
Laws prohibiting material designed to stimulate prurient desire in targeted audiences are sufficiently precise when clearly defined.
[ "Mishkin v. New York" ]
Butler v. Michigan
Overruled
A guilty ruling won't stand without evidence that competent assistance would likely produce an alternative outcome.
[ "Strickland v. Washington" ]
Holloway v. Arkansas
Overruled
Constitutional safeguards ensure that civil actions against member governments in their own judicial proceedings cannot be authorized by federal legislative action.
[ "Alden v. Maine" ]
Haywood v. Drown
Overruled
The uniformity of vote counting across jurisdictions is mandated by the nation's foundational legal document to protect against disparate treatment of individual voter choices.
[ "Bush v. Gore" ]
null
Supported
Because the legislature purposefully excluded time-based constraints for public assistance applications, courts must not enforce them regardless of lengthy resolution periods.
[ "Heckler v. Day" ]
null
Refuted
Laws that create school districts based on religious affiliation are permissible.
[ "Board of Education or Kiryas Joel Village School District v. Grumet" ]
null
Refuted
An appellate court's non-compliance with legislatively mandated deadlines has no effect on a superior tribunal's adjudicatory authority.
[ "Hertz Corp. v. Friend" ]
null
Refuted
Governments are prohibited from disadvantaging liquor providers from other jurisdictions compared to local entities under the constitutional provision that repealed Federal Prohibition.
[ "Granholm v. Heald" ]
California v. LaRue
Overruled
Correctional facilities are legally required to enable close relatives and those in custody to have direct physical interaction despite the existence of safety hazards.
[ "Block v. Rutherford" ]
null
Refuted
In a defamation case, the plaintiff must prove the statement is false.
[ "Philadelphia Newspapers Inc. v. Hepps" ]
null
Refuted
The government doesn't have to pay property owners when taking property used in a crime.
[ "Bennis v. Michigan" ]
Horne v. Department of Agriculture
Overruled
An agency overseeing workplace fairness can require employers to reimburse individuals without legal work permission for income lost after dismissal or expulsion due to collective efforts to improve conditions.
[ "Sure-Tan, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board" ]
Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Overruled
Federal law does not require that a person intends to commit a crime when they first start staying in a building without permission. They can form that intent later while still inside.
[ "Quarles v. United States" ]
Jacobson v. United States
Overruled
When a magistrate's permission to search fails to include specific targets for confiscation, an ordinary government agent could never deem it legally sound.
[ "Groh v. Ramirez" ]
Warden v. Hayden
Overruled
A state-level criminal conviction may qualify as a grave offense warranting noncitizen ejection despite the omission of a federal condition concerning economic activity across state lines.
[ "Luna Torres v. Lynch" ]
Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder; Mathis v. United States
Overruled
Agencies can consider how a law has been used before to help understand it.
[ "Zuni Public School Dist. No. 89 v. Department of Education" ]
null
Supported
Evidence that is unclear or not directly connected to the crime does not automatically make a conviction invalid.
[ "Wetzel v. Lambert" ]
Edwards v. South Carolina
Overruled
Procedural rights mandated by the Constitution are breached whenever offense-to-accusation chronology exceeds permissible limits, irrespective of prosecutorial assertions.
[ "United States v. Lovasco" ]
null
Refuted
The right to a lawyer under the Sixth Amendment only applies to the specific crime a person is charged with and does not cover other crimes that are related but not charged.
[ "Texas v. Cobb" ]
Fellers v. United States
Overruled
When parties are contractually obligated to resolve all disagreements through private means, an impartial third-party can allow consolidated addressing of similar claims based on the pact's sweeping terms.
[ "Oxford Health Plans v. Sutter" ]
Kindred Nursing Centers Limited Partnership v. Clark
Overruled
When a person asks a federal court to overturn a state court conviction, the federal court can only use Supreme Court decisions that existed before the state court made its decision.
[ "Greene v. Fisher" ]
Bousley v. United States; Montgomery v. Louisiana
Overruled
A statute extending exclusive advantages based on sex passes constitutional scrutiny when addressing hardships disproportionately faced by the affected demographic.
[ "Kahn v. Shevin" ]
United States v. Virginia
Overruled
A police officer may only pat down a person for weapons if there is a reasonable belief that the person is armed and dangerous.
[ "Ybarra v. Illinois" ]
Pennsylvania v. Mimms
Overruled
Some statements can be used in court without the defendant questioning the person who made them, if the law allows those exceptions.
[ "Dutton v. Evans" ]
null
Supported
Biological parentage alone is sufficient to establish a child's eligibility for Social Security benefits.
[ "Astrue v. Capato" ]
null
Refuted
Adjudicative bodies lack jurisdiction over disputes involving proprietary brand elements when rights holders issue binding commitments barring all subsequent legal proceedings targeting corporate entities.
[ "Already LLC v. Nike" ]
Arthur Andersen LLP v. Carlisle
Overruled
Under the federal statute targeting deception in capital markets, claims can only succeed against those who personally created misleading data or employed schemes to distort facts that investors acted upon.
[ "Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc." ]
United States v. O'Hagan
Overruled
Unsanctioned governmental incursion into a residence during flight is permissible only when case-specific conditions are met.
[ "Lange v. California" ]
County of Sacramento v. Lewis
Overruled
Federal minimum wage laws categorize the period of movement from locker rooms to job sites after donning mandated safety apparel as compensable work time.
[ "IBP, Inc. v. Alvarez" ]
null
Refuted
Organizing citizens to initiate legal proceedings regarding systemic inequities is shielded under constitutional guarantees as civic advocacy.
[ "National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Button" ]
null
Supported
Incorporation within territories administered by an external sovereign results in alien status in American federal courts.
[ "JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Traffic Stream (BVI) Infrastructure Ltd." ]
null
Supported
Federal legislation shielding interstate trucking services from state oversight applies strictly during the movement of freight and excludes any post-shipping activities such as selling or scrapping the assets.
[ "Dan's City Used Cars v. Pelkey" ]
null
Refuted
Adjacent entitlement holders receive no indemnification for changes to their aquatic interface when sovereign bodies deposit material into submerged zones.
[ "Stop the Beach Renourishment Inc. v. Florida Department of Environmental Protection" ]
Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States of America; Lucas v. South Carolina Coast Council
Overruled
A federal law in force during military hostilities exclusively governs crime prosecution deadlines, with private deception claims entirely beyond its reach.
[ "Kellogg Brown & Root v. U.S. ex rel. Carter" ]
null
Supported
Statutes mandating evidence of a physician's intent to carry out a prohibited medical intervention prior to enforcement are sufficiently narrow.
[ "Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc." ]
Mazurek v. Armstrong
Overruled
Judicial bodies may sanction nominal monetary relief recognizing prior civil rights infringements regardless of changes made to the responsible rule.
[ "Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski" ]
Schweiker v. Chilicky
Overruled
Information relayed to healthcare providers when securing care may be used as evidence in court regardless of the person's necessity to speak before judicial authorities.
[ "White v. Illinois" ]
Lilly v. Virginia
Overruled
Governmental bodies transferring civil litigation to Article III courts waive immunity against suits brought by residents outside their jurisdiction.
[ "Lapides v. Board of Regents of University System of Georgia" ]
Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt
Overruled
Individuals paying federal taxes have no right to initiate legal action regarding spiritual programs financed by standard administrative appropriations.
[ "Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc." ]
Flast v. Cohen
Overruled
When material is only potentially useful for demonstrating the accused's non-guilt, law enforcement personnel eliminating such items without improper motive does not violate constitutional procedural fairness.
[ "Illinois v. Fisher" ]
Chambers v. Mississippi
Overruled
The state holding a person cannot review whether another state's laws were applied correctly.
[ "New Mexico ex rel. Ortiz v. Reed" ]
Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt
Overruled
The right to petition for appellate review of environmental authorization decisions exists irrespective of the authorizing tier of government.
[ "Crown Simpson Pulp Company v. Costle" ]
National Association of Manufacturers v. Department of Defense
Overruled
If a government worker claims job separation stemmed from constitutionally protected expression, statutory provisions necessitate a judicial determination of factual disputes.
[ "Perry v. Sindermann" ]
Connick v. Myers
Overruled
When Congress passes statutes restricting government units' management of information linked to specific individuals, this does not breach the constitutional balance of powers if such statutes don't compel agencies to execute national directives toward civilian populations.
[ "Reno v. Condon" ]
Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
Overruled
When a state court issues a brief, unexplained decision on a federal claim, federal courts must check the last state court decision that explained its reasoning and assume the unexplained decision agreed with it unless the state proves otherwise.
[ "Adams v. Robertson" ]
null
Supported
For non-citizens facing deportation, a state narcotics finding of guilt is deemed serious only if the court recognized recidivism during proceedings.
[ "Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder" ]
null
Supported
Law enforcement personnel may require vehicle occupants to disembark from automobiles during standard vehicular detentions without suspicion of threat.
[ "Pennsylvania v. Mimms" ]
null
Supported
Thoroughfares open to all are constitutionally safeguarded for expression; statutes may not obstruct the sharing of views in these areas.
[ "McCullen v. Coakley" ]
null
Supported
The requirement for fee payment and procedural compliance applies to individuals perpetuating baseless legal claims before fresh submissions are permitted.
[ "Antonelli v. United States" ]
null
Supported
Tax laws that exempt religious publications but not nonreligious ones violate the Constitution's protection for a free press by discriminating based on content.
[ "Aguilar v. Felton" ]
null
Supported
Courts cannot block a new lawsuit just because of a prior case if the new case involves different facts or parties.
[ "South Central Bell Telephone Company v. Alabama" ]
null
Supported
A suspect's waiver of the right to an attorney is valid if they were properly informed of their rights and chose to waive them, even if police never mentioned a lawyer's attempt to contact them.
[ "Berghuis v. Thompkins" ]
null
Supported
When segments of a statute conflict with the nation's foundational charter, judicial bodies typically excise merely that specific part while preserving the remainder.
[ "Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England" ]
null
Supported