claim
stringlengths
47
415
case_name
listlengths
1
5
overruling_case
stringclasses
301 values
label
stringclasses
3 values
Under IDEA, a school district may be required to reimburse a former student for private school tuition even if the student withdrew from public school unilaterally and for reasons unrelated to their disability, if the public school failed to provide a free and appropriate public education.
[ "Forest Grove School District v. T.A." ]
null
Refuted
Law enforcement need not secure prior judicial approval when visually scanning private land from areas where aircraft regularly fly.
[ "California v. Ciraolo" ]
null
Supported
Intentional misrepresentations on fiscal documents that reduce government funds by more than ten thousand dollars are adjudicated as deceptive offenses affecting lawful presence.
[ "Kawashima v. Holder" ]
null
Supported
The constitutional protection of private association empowers organizations to exclude individuals based on gender, even when outside parties attend their gatherings.
[ "Board of Directors, Rotary International v. Rotary Club of Duarte" ]
null
Refuted
Court approval for evidence-gathering costs requires the central legal argument to be tenable at submission.
[ "Ayestas v. Davis" ]
null
Refuted
Governing bodies lack the authority to bar the media from revealing content unless they prove urgent and unambiguous danger to the nation's safety, merely due to possible harm to international ties or the country's interests.
[ "New York Times Company v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
Discourse addressing those in authority may only be curtailed by state entities when it meets the definition of sexually explicit material or is likely to precipitate immediate violent behavior.
[ "St. Amant v. Thompson", "Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association v. Brentwood Academy" ]
null
Supported
During judicial proceedings with multiple accused persons, a self-incriminating statement containing clearly visible omissions marked as 'censored' impairs the co-accused's entitlement to cross-examine the declarant.
[ "Gray v. Maryland" ]
null
Supported
The constitutional right to expression remains unimpeded by government funding of particular creative endeavors over others, as these selections stem from budgetary processes rather than communication-restricting measures.
[ "National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley" ]
null
Supported
Employment remuneration rules set by states are unimpeded by federal welfare statutes.
[ "California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement v. Dillingham Construction, N.A." ]
null
Supported
Submerged lands within a tribal reservation are owned by the state, not by the federal government for the tribe's benefit.
[ "Idaho v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
Federal authorities are required to implement viable options that exclude persons with faith-based objections from service provision when feasible.
[ "Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores" ]
null
Supported
Courts are not required to hold a fact-finding gathering before reincarcerating individuals under non-custodial supervision for violations.
[ "Gagnon v. Scarpelli" ]
null
Refuted
A claim that detention was retaliatory for expression remains viable even in the presence of adequate evidence supporting the state's action.
[ "Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach, Florida" ]
Nieves v. Bartlett
Overruled
Public authorities cannot ban contractors from public projects based solely on electoral stances or civic organization memberships without proving a connection to task performance.
[ "O'Hare Truck Service, Inc. v. City of Northlake" ]
null
Refuted
Claiming innocence alone, without any constitutional errors in the trial, requires evidence so strong that it's nearly certain the person is innocent, but the law does not define exactly how strong that evidence must be.
[ "House v. Bell" ]
null
Supported
Government property takings to address harm do not implicate constitutional prohibitions against multiple prosecutions for identical offenses, regardless of resulting convictions
[ "United States v. Ursery" ]
null
Refuted
Adjusting welfare benefits based on household income does not violate the Constitution's protection against taking property without compensation.
[ "Bowen v. Gilliard" ]
null
Supported
United States courts must assess contested material facts in guilty verdict challenge applications before authorizing an inquiry.
[ "Townsend v. Sain" ]
null
Refuted
Constitutional safeguards against arbitrary police actions demand a justification for halting an automobile that exceeds mere hunches or stereotypes.
[ "United States v. Brignoni-Ponce" ]
null
Supported
The government cannot ban speech just because it's offensive; it must prove the speech has no value to society.
[ "Reno v. ACLU" ]
null
Supported
Automatic railcar joining and separation without human intervention is required by statute; connection component misalignment contravenes this obligation.
[ "Norfolk & Western Railway Company v. Hiles" ]
null
Refuted
Statements from colleagues who experienced comparable mistreatment may be allowed when addressing company-wide systemic problems.
[ "Sprint/United Management Co. v. Mendelsohn" ]
null
Refuted
Companies must not engage in exclusionary practices against another entity to alter provisions in unrelated transactions.
[ "Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. California" ]
Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc.
Overruled
Restrictions on financial contributions from incorporated entities to elections for Congress and the presidency are legally permissible in order to prevent undue sway over voting outcomes.
[ "Federal Election Commission v. Beaumont" ]
First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti
Overruled
The federal law managing shared infrastructure connections encompasses installations delivering streaming video and broadband data services.
[ "National Cable and Telecommunications Association v. Gulf Power Company" ]
null
Refuted
Mandatory contributions to fund independent messaging could contravene constitutional expression guarantees, whereas publicly organized communications are permissible under constitutional law.
[ "Johanns v. Livestock Marketing Association" ]
Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31
Overruled
Federal law protects employees from retaliation for opposing discriminatory practices, even if the retaliation is directed at someone who did not directly oppose the practices but is closely associated with someone who did.
[ "Thompson v. North American Stainless, LP" ]
null
Refuted
Legal provisions across U.S. jurisdictions provide redress for death resulting from negligence in waterway accidents where the deceased lacked ship-based occupational ties.
[ "Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. v. Calhoun" ]
null
Supported
Government-backed loan protections for temporary occupancy properties remain valid if original legislation had no explicit prohibition despite subsequent bans.
[ "Federal Housing Administration v. The Darlington, Inc." ]
null
Refuted
When individuals pursue claims against public authorities regarding breaches of foundational protections tied to land utilization, a citizen panel is available to resolve factual issues.
[ "City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey" ]
null
Supported
Disputes resolved through private one-on-one processes prevent employees from joining multi-plaintiff court proceedings.
[ "Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis" ]
American Express Co., et al. v. Italian Colors Restaurant
Overruled
Indigenous sovereign nations' judicial bodies cannot adjudicate disputes between non-Indian parties originating from motor vehicle accidents on roadways managed by sub-national governments under federal easement grants within indigenous territories unless expressly authorized by congressional legislation or federal-ind...
[ "Strate v. A-1 Contractors", "United States v. Lara" ]
null
Refuted
Sovereign jurisdiction over who may approach defense sites suffices for trespass enforcement without requiring exclusive property rights.
[ "United States v. Apel" ]
null
Supported
To satisfy the standard for adequate defense, advocates must dispute all materials provided by prosecutors when accepted as credible within their professional discipline during judicial proceedings.
[ "Maryland v. Kulbicki" ]
null
Refuted
Per U.S. Code Title 26, section 3231(e)(1), duty is levied for itemized cash payments only; equity-linked rewards are not currency and thus not assessed.
[ "Wisconsin Central Ltd. v. United States" ]
BNSF Railway Co. v. Loos
Overruled
Electoral financial ceilings that are inadequate and unindexed to cost-of-living changes may contravene constitutional free expression protections.
[ "Thompson v. Hebdon" ]
null
Supported
The government must prove the substance in a drug conviction is regulated by federal law to deport someone.
[ "Mellouli v. Lynch" ]
null
Supported
Educational institutions may not require instructors to be absent after a child's arrival without clinical justification.
[ "Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur" ]
null
Supported
Penalties may be imposed on civil service personnel who submit inaccurate information during agency probes concerning suspected wrongdoing.
[ "Lachance v. Erickson" ]
null
Refuted
In racketeering civil cases, the filing deadline is 4 years past discovery of injury, regardless of insight into the criminal schemes responsible.
[ "Rotella v. Wood" ]
null
Supported
A past experience of harm alone does not prove the harm will happen again.
[ "City of Los Angeles v. Lyons" ]
null
Supported
A violent crime that spans multiple states allows the firearm charge to be filed in any of those states.
[ "United States v. Rodriguez-Moreno" ]
null
Supported
Imposing chemical interventions without consent during judicial proceedings can distort behavior, introducing procedural inequity.
[ "Riggins v. Nevada" ]
null
Supported
Binding resolution of multiple claims in a unified proceeding requires agreement-specific language authorizing such joint adjudication.
[ "Green Tree Financial Corp. v. Bazzle" ]
Stolt-Nielsen v. Animalfeeds International Corp.
Overruled
Allegations of obstructing judicial process do not entitle compensation for irreversible harm.
[ "Christopher v. Harbury" ]
null
Supported
In proceedings where the ultimate sanction applies, the sentencing panel's unanimous agreement on mitigating circumstances is unnecessary.
[ "Buchanan v. Angelone", "Smith v. Spisak" ]
null
Supported
Federal courts consider state court dismissals of post-conviction motions as addressing core issues despite absence of federal legal standards in state opinions.
[ "Johnson v. Williams" ]
Wilson v. Sellers
Overruled
When a federal authority has legal power to oversee commercial activities and consistently implements regulations, individual competition law claims regarding those activities cannot be pursued.
[ "Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. Billing" ]
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Waffle House, Inc.; FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health System; Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus
Overruled
Measures restricted to circumstances devoid of competing offers satisfy constitutional non-discrimination standards where owners face financial-regulatory adversity.
[ "Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission" ]
null
Supported
State authorities may publicly disseminate information related to criminal convictions based on final judicial determinations with no requirement for pre-disclosure challenges.
[ "Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. Doe" ]
null
Supported
Judicial oversight of credible fear determinations for foreign nationals in swift deportation proceedings is not mandated by the U.S. founding document.
[ "Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam" ]
null
Supported
Government employers are obligated to establish a reasonable foundation for termination based on expressive activity, yet are not required to perform a detailed inquiry.
[ "Waters v. Churchill" ]
null
Supported
When a business entity's service fees surpass legally acceptable thresholds, reimbursement to consumers for excess payments is required irrespective of regional charge allocation.
[ "Federal Power Commission v. Tennessee Gas Transmission Company" ]
null
Supported
The person commencing legal proceedings cannot establish a fixed indemnity amount without court-approved group status, causing federal courts to retain authority if the sum of all compensatory claims tops $5,000,000.
[ "Standard Fire Insurance Company v. Knowles" ]
null
Supported
Challenges to environmental agency decisions on contaminant release thresholds may proceed to appellate courts without needing administrative resolution first.
[ "Crown Simpson Pulp Company v. Costle" ]
null
Refuted
Government bodies may sanction personnel for reporting unfair treatment due to longevity.
[ "Gómez-Pérez v. Potter" ]
null
Refuted
Education sector personnel may be individually responsible for compensatory payments when their actions later contravene a student's rights under the supreme law, despite behaving prudently during the incident.
[ "Morse v. Frederick", "Safford Unified School District v. Redding" ]
null
Refuted
Educational authorities cannot impose suspensions with no defined end date for learners whose disabilities result in threatening conduct or classroom chaos, regardless of the nature of the behavior.
[ "Honig v. Doe" ]
null
Refuted
Business practices that demonstrably alter cross-state commerce flows may fall within federal jurisdiction, regardless of the connection's immediacy.
[ "National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation" ]
null
Supported
To prove the harm arising from deficient attorney guidance about a prosecutorial pretrial resolution proposal, the defendant must establish that they would have consented to the conditions, the court would have ratified them, and the disposition would be less severe than resulting from trial.
[ "Lafler v. Cooper", "Lee v. United States", "Missouri v. Frye" ]
null
Refuted
When government employees act to implement a corporate entity's exclusionary rules related to heritage, the action is deemed governmental and unconstitutional.
[ "Griffin v. Maryland" ]
null
Supported
The nation's bedrock legal framework protects citizens' right to choose a spouse without restrictions tied to ancestral lineage.
[ "Loving v. Virginia" ]
null
Supported
Federal statutory provisions prohibit judicial authorities in states from apportioning veterans' armed forces pensions waived to obtain compensation for service-related injuries.
[ "Howell v. Howell" ]
null
Supported
A law requiring permits for businesses does not violate free speech just because it doesn't have specific wording about courts acting quickly. The law is constitutional if courts usually resolve appeals without unnecessary delays.
[ "City of Littleton v. Z.J. Gifts D-4, L.L.C." ]
McCullen v. Coakley
Overruled
Corrective educational programs addressing consequences of historical race-based separation are to be supplied by schools under judicial mandate, with financial obligations assigned to state governments.
[ "Milliken v. Bradley" ]
null
Refuted
When assessing whether a government measure has resulted in a property deprivation necessitating compensation, land sections that lie in physical proximity and are owned by a single entity must be viewed as an integrated whole rather than separate components.
[ "Murr v. Wisconsin" ]
null
Refuted
Confiscation of monetary assets by federal authorities is prohibited when cross-border movement remains undisclosed and involves no criminal misconduct or fiscal harm to the Treasury.
[ "United States v. Bajakajian" ]
null
Refuted
Monetary relief imposed on a sovereign in a foreign court must not exceed the forum's payment obligations for analogous disputes involving the forum's administrative bodies.
[ "Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt" ]
null
Supported
Materials procured through unconstitutional means may be considered during the panel's review for formal charges.
[ "United States v. Calandra" ]
Gelbard v. United States
Overruled
The legal entitlement to disability accommodations remains intact even if the child's educational setting is faith-based.
[ "Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District" ]
null
Supported
When a statute employs language concerning the gathering of people to overthrow state power, its interpretation is restricted to the initial creation of a previously nonexistent entity, not sustained operations within a preestablished collective.
[ "Yates v. United States" ]
null
Supported
A court must dismiss an appeal if the notice of appeal is not signed, even if it was filed on time and meets all other requirements, and even if the appellant subsequently provides a signature when notified of the omission.
[ "Becker v. Montgomery" ]
null
Refuted
Courts can block evidence of a witness's past actions to show they lie, unless those actions were crimes involving dishonesty.
[ "Nevada v. Jackson" ]
null
Supported
When individuals in official roles apply biased policies at an independent facility, their conduct is governed by constitutional requirements.
[ "Griffin v. Maryland" ]
null
Refuted
Governmental restraint of personal freedom does not occur merely due to pursuit; bodily contact or submission to directives is necessary for legal recognition.
[ "Brown v. Texas", "California v. Hodari D.", "Dunaway v. New York", "Kaupp v. Texas", "Michigan v. Chesternut" ]
null
Supported
Professionals may include professional credentials issued by independent bodies in business materials provided the criteria are defined clearly and the presented details demonstrate truthfulness.
[ "Peel v. Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of Illinois" ]
null
Supported
Actions taken following the expiration of a legislatively established period for governmental operations do not automatically lose their legal validity, irrespective of the presence of duty-imposing wordings.
[ "Barnhart v. Peabody Coal Company" ]
null
Refuted
Government agencies are legally obligated to release an individual's criminal records to the public, and privacy concerns cannot justify withholding this information.
[ "Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press" ]
null
Refuted
Whether a court order can be appealed depends on whether it is final, not on whether the issue is ready for the court to decide.
[ "United States v. Jose" ]
null
Supported
Federal courts can only hear cases where there is an immediate threat of harm caused by a law or regulation.
[ "Summers v. Earth Island Institute" ]
Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner; Bond v. United States; City of Chicago v. International College of Surgeons; Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance; Sisson v. Ruby; Williams v. Taylor
Overruled
Safety screening operations must follow strict procedures that avoid stops lacking proper justification.
[ "Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz" ]
null
Supported
When a crime targets someone because of their race, the law can consider the extra harm done to the victim and community when deciding the sentence.
[ "Wisconsin v. Mitchell" ]
null
Supported
Confidential discussions between a legal advisor and the person being served retain immunity from compelled disclosure even after the individual's demise.
[ "Swidler & Berlin v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
Taxpayer financial support for faith-affiliated learning centers fails constitutional muster owing to continuous content verification needs to remove faith-based influences from curriculum.
[ "Lemon v. Kurtzman" ]
Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue; Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District
Overruled
Sovereign immunity shields states from litigation in U.S. courts irrespective of third-party indemnification sources.
[ "Regents of University of California v. Doe" ]
Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt
Overruled
For circumstances where a crime is currently in progress, communication to law enforcement for immediate intervention creates admissible records that do not necessitate the speaker's appearance to provide evidence under questioning.
[ "Davis v. Washington" ]
null
Supported
Judicial orders enforcing constitutional compliance must be dissolved only after educational institutions prove no bias-based distinctions.
[ "Board of Education of Oklahoma City Public Schools v. Dowell" ]
null
Supported
Agencies must base decisions on evidence related to the specific legal question, and cannot rely on factors unrelated to those costs or revenues, even if they believe doing so will lead to a fair outcome.
[ "Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Company" ]
null
Refuted
The constitutional prohibition on cruel and unusual punishments does not block capital punishment for individuals who underwent a constitutionally adequate judicial process, regardless of subsequent evidence indicating they did not commit the crime.
[ "Herrera v. Collins" ]
Coker v. Georgia
Overruled
Any demonstration of unjustifiable favoritism by panel members must be disclosed to the court before the conclusion of the case; following the issuance of the judgment, such information based on private discussions has no legal bearing.
[ "Warger v. Shauers" ]
null
Supported
National statutes prohibit denying real estate sales or rentals based on race.
[ "Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Company", "Shaare Tefila Congregation v. Cobb" ]
null
Supported
If procedural standards offer judicial latitude to waive mandates, jurisdictions can still preclude national assessment of their adjudicatory outcomes.
[ "Beard v. Kindler" ]
Kucana v. Holder; Moore v. Sims; National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama ex rel. Flowers; Ohio Civil Rights Commission v. Dayton Christian Public Schools, Inc.
Overruled
Commercial appraisal alone is insufficient to classify an asset as liable for tax when paid in currency.
[ "Wisconsin Central Ltd. v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
An individual charged with a crime cannot legally obtain specifics about the person who contributed to the offense and is central to the government's case, no matter how critical their provided evidence is to the accused's rebuttal.
[ "Roviaro v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
Denying benefits for unauthorized border crossings before statute passage does not contravene the legally permissible temporal scope of legislation.
[ "Fernandez-Vargas v. Gonzales" ]
null
Refuted
Truthful commercial communications about professional offerings are shielded by constitutional free speech protections.
[ "Bates v. State Bar of Arizona", "Bigelow v. Virginia" ]
null
Supported
Federal courts must consider all possible reasons that could explain a state court's decision, even if those reasons weren't mentioned.
[ "Sexton v. Beaudreaux" ]
Ohio Civil Rights Commission v. Dayton Christian Public Schools, Inc.
Overruled
A guilty plea is not valid if subsequent evidence demonstrates the defendant did not genuinely understand the charges, even if counsel explained the charges and the defendant affirmed understanding at the time of the plea.
[ "Bradshaw v. Stumpf" ]
null
Refuted
An individual initiating a case for the benefit of many may keep it in state court by setting a compensation cap, as this assurance applies to all involved before the court validates the group.
[ "Standard Fire Insurance Company v. Knowles" ]
null
Refuted