id stringlengths 16 19 | source_scenario stringlengths 12 12 | conflict_risk stringclasses 3
values | dialog_type stringclasses 4
values | num_characters int64 2 5 | characters stringlengths 9 43 | description stringlengths 266 488 | character_roles stringlengths 41 113 | expression_styles stringlengths 42 148 | conflict_characteristics stringlengths 41 123 | role_profiles stringlengths 269 746 | emotions stringlengths 34 99 | emotion_descriptions stringlengths 174 488 | expression_tasks stringlengths 292 921 | characteristic_tasks stringlengths 280 909 | interaction_regulation_tasks stringlengths 391 1.47k | interaction_outcome_tasks stringlengths 450 1.69k | bdi_risk stringlengths 938 2.83k | group_image_labeled stringlengths 37 37 | individual_images stringlengths 117 299 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
agentviss_medium_21 | scenario_058 | medium | Persuasion | 5 | Ethan; Mark; Clara; Mia; Sasha | In the group's corner, Ethan points out the woman and presents his interest in a way that turns the conversation into a test of whether he should introduce himself. Mark argues that Ethan's chances are not realistic, while Clara, Mia, and Sasha work to make support for the introduction the dominant group position until... | {"Clara": "Auxiliary", "Ethan": "Proponent", "Mark": "Respondent", "Mia": "Auxiliary", "Sasha": "Auxiliary"} | {"Clara": "Strategic Withholding", "Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Mark": "Honest Signaling", "Mia": "Exaggeration", "Sasha": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Clara": "Accommodating", "Ethan": "Collaborating", "Mark": "Competing", "Mia": "Accommodating", "Sasha": "Accommodating"} | {"Clara": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "female", "occupation": "restaurant manager"}, "Ethan": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "writer"}, "Mark": {"age"... | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral", "Mark": "Neutral", "Mia": "Neutral", "Sasha": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Mark": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Mark at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Mia": "No clear facial aff... | {"Clara": "Clara selectively voices supportive points for Ethan while withholding doubts that would strengthen Mark's skepticism so endorsement of the introduction becomes more dominant in the group's talk.", "Ethan": "Ethan states his interest and his plan to introduce himself in direct terms without masking uncertain... | {"Clara": "Clara takes an accommodating role by backing Ethan and smoothing over Mark's discouraging position to keep the group's stance aligned behind the introduction.", "Ethan": "Ethan frames the discussion as a shared evaluation and then commits to approaching her as a collaborative way to settle the dispute withou... | {"Clara": "Clara tracks Mark's reframing, Ethan's hesitation, and Mia's or Sasha's nods, gaze, or posture shifts, then times concise supportive comments to reinforce momentum whenever skepticism starts to regain space.", "Ethan": "Ethan watches for Mark's interruptions, Clara's or Mia's agreement, and Sasha's posture o... | {"Clara": "Clara helps produce a group outcome in which Clara's timed supportive remarks, echoed by Mia and Sasha and visible in Ethan's response, make support for the introduction more dominant than Mark's skepticism before Ethan approaches the woman.", "Ethan": "Ethan brings the group debate to a clear result when Cl... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Mark's skepticism is shaping the group's discussion, and Ethan's decision now carries implications for whether the group supports or discourages him.", "desire": "To shift the group toward endorsing Ethan's introduction rather than leaving Mark's skepticism as the dominant view.", "intention": "To... | images/scenario_058/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_058/individual/character_03.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_058/individual/character_01.jpg", "Mark": "images/scenario_058/individual/character_02.jpg", "Mia": "images/scenario_058/individual/character_04.jpg", "Sasha": "images/scenario_058/individual/character_05.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_22 | scenario_011 | medium | Persuasion | 2 | Elena; Ben | At the edge of the seating area during the informal gathering, Ben approaches Elena with a direct personal invitation, making clear that he wants the exchange understood as a proposal rather than ordinary mingling. As he starts to pull back after stating it, Elena calls him back so the conversation stays centered on cl... | {"Ben": "Proponent", "Elena": "Respondent"} | {"Ben": "Deception", "Elena": "Exaggeration"} | {"Ben": "Competing", "Elena": "Collaborating"} | {"Ben": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "marketing executive"}, "Elena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "graphic designer"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben should use deception to present the invitation as clearly serious while leaving selective ambiguity in wording or demeanor that preserves room to reinterpret the exchange if needed.", "Elena": "Elena should use exaggeration to restate the exchange as unmistakably centered on Ben's direct invitation so any ... | {"Ben": "Ben should adopt a competing stance by steering the interaction toward consideration of Ben's invitation on Ben's terms without conceding that the exchange can be dismissed as ordinary mingling.", "Elena": "Elena should pursue a collaborating stance by keeping the discussion focused on making Ben's proposal ex... | {"Ben": "Ben should watch Elena for agreement, hesitation, calls for clarification, sustained eye contact, posture shifts, or tension cues, and Ben should adjust by pressing the proposal more firmly, softening the framing, or redirecting wording to protect social standing.", "Elena": "Elena should monitor Ben for hesit... | {"Ben": "Ben and Elena reach an interactional state in which Elena gives visible consideration to Ben's invitation as a serious personal proposal and Ben preserves enough ambiguity in wording or demeanor to protect social standing while both Elena and Ben treat the exchange as more than casual conversation.", "Elena": ... | {"Ben": {"belief": "Elena understands that he is asking her out, and his retreat could end the exchange before she gives a clear response.", "desire": "To secure consideration of his invitation without letting it be dismissed as mere casual conversation.", "intention": "To present the exchange as a serious personal pro... | images/scenario_011/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_011/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_011/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_23 | scenario_012 | medium | Information-seeking | 2 | Elena; Leo | Near the doorway by the main living area, Elena pauses with a paper while Leo directly asks to use moisturizer for an important upcoming occasion. After briefly checking what he needs it for, she treats the request as acceptable and tells him he can use the moisturizer available in the bathroom. | {"Elena": "Questioner", "Leo": "Answerer"} | {"Elena": "Exaggeration", "Leo": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Elena": "Competing", "Leo": "Accommodating"} | {"Elena": {"age": "28", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Freelance Writer"}, "Leo": {"age": "29", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Actor"}} | {"Elena": "Neutral", "Leo": "Neutral"} | {"Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Leo": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Leo at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Elena": "Elena should state that Leo's occasion makes the request sufficiently important while amplifying the need for a quick legitimacy check before granting access to the bathroom moisturizer.", "Leo": "Leo should directly request the moisturizer and truthfully give a brief reason tied to the upcoming occasion wit... | {"Elena": "Elena should control the exchange by asking for Leo's reason first and positioning authorization as Elena's decision about proper access to the shared moisturizer.", "Leo": "Leo should frame the request in a way that accepts Elena's authority over access and prioritize getting permission without challenging ... | {"Elena": "Elena should watch for Leo's concise agreement, hesitation, interruption, or gaze and posture shifts, then shorten the check and grant access if signals stay steady or restate the access condition more firmly if signals become evasive.", "Leo": "Leo should monitor Elena's follow-up questions, pauses, facial ... | {"Elena": "Elena and Leo reach a visible agreement that Leo's brief explanation makes the request acceptable, shown by Elena verbally authorizing the bathroom moisturizer and Leo acknowledging the permission without challenging Elena's control.", "Leo": "Leo and Elena establish through Leo's direct explanation and Elen... | {"Elena": {"belief": "Leo needs moisturizer right away for an important upcoming occasion and is asking because he does not have direct access to it himself.", "desire": "To clarify the legitimacy of Leo's request and manage access to the available moisturizer appropriately.", "intention": "To confirm the reason for th... | images/scenario_012/group_labeled.png | {"Elena": "images/scenario_012/individual/character_01.jpg", "Leo": "images/scenario_012/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_24 | scenario_013 | medium | Information-seeking | 2 | Ethan; Clara | In the shared apartment's common area near the kitchen, Ethan asks Clara where the person receiving the call can be found, and Clara says he is in the bathroom while making clear that going in would be inappropriate. The exchange centers on locating the right resident and maintaining the boundary Clara identifies aroun... | {"Clara": "Answerer", "Ethan": "Questioner"} | {"Clara": "Honest Signaling", "Ethan": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Clara": "Competing", "Ethan": "Collaborating"} | {"Clara": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "graphic designer"}, "Ethan": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "marketing associate"}} | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara should answer that the called person is in the bathroom and directly state that going in would be inappropriate so the location and limit are both unmistakable.", "Ethan": "Ethan should state that the called person is in the bathroom and explicitly acknowledge Clara's warning by indicating that the mes... | {"Clara": "Clara should hold the boundary firmly by prioritizing the bathroom limit over Ethan's convenience and framing entry as unacceptable rather than negotiable.", "Ethan": "Ethan should position the exchange as a shared coordination problem by asking only for the correct resident's location and aligning the next ... | {"Clara": "Clara should watch for Ethan's agreement, hesitation, interruption, forward movement, gaze toward the bathroom, or posture shifts and tighten wording, repeat the limit, or step in earlier when those signals suggest the boundary may be tested.", "Ethan": "Ethan should monitor Clara for interruption, hesitatio... | {"Clara": "Clara and Ethan establish an observable boundary-respecting resolution in which Clara's statement that the called person is in the bathroom is accepted by Ethan as sufficient information and bathroom entry is treated as off-limits, as shown through Clara's explicit limit, Ethan's confirming reply, and Ethan'... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Ethan wants to locate the person for whom the call is intended, and entering the bathroom would be inappropriate under the current circumstances.", "desire": "To inform Ethan of the person's whereabouts while maintaining an appropriate social boundary around the bathroom.", "intention": "To answer... | images/scenario_013/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_013/individual/character_02.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_013/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_25 | scenario_014 | medium | Persuasion | 2 | Clara; Daniel | In a private room in the college residence, Daniel directly challenges the relationship terms Clara assumed they had, arguing that they should define themselves as exclusive. Near the doorway, Clara resists that redefinition, insisting on maintaining the existing non-exclusive arrangement even as their disagreement sha... | {"Clara": "Respondent", "Daniel": "Proponent"} | {"Clara": "Exaggeration", "Daniel": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Clara": "Competing", "Daniel": "Collaborating"} | {"Clara": {"age": "26", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "college student"}, "Daniel": {"age": "27", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "college student"}} | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Daniel": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Daniel": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Daniel at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must overstate how firmly the prior non-exclusive understanding was established and how disruptive exclusivity would be, while avoiding any wording that could be interpreted as accepting Daniel's redefinition.", "Daniel": "Daniel must state openly that Daniel views the current arrangement as insufficie... | {"Clara": "Clara must take a competing stance by asserting continuation of the existing terms as the baseline and rejecting concessions that would limit Clara's other romantic tie.", "Daniel": "Daniel must use a collaborating stance by framing exclusivity as a need for a mutually clear definition and inviting Clara to ... | {"Clara": "Clara must watch for Daniel's interruptions, reframing, steady gaze, and posture shifts, then respond by increasing emphasis when Daniel presses forward and cutting statements shorter and more explicit when Daniel shows hesitation or pauses.", "Daniel": "Daniel must monitor Clara's resistance through rebutta... | {"Clara": "Clara and Daniel end the exchange with Clara explicitly restating that the relationship remains non-exclusive and Daniel verbally recognizing that Clara has not accepted exclusivity, as shown through Clara's intensified wording, Daniel's direct reply, and both participants' visible adjustments to pauses, gaz... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Clara believes Daniel is trying to change their current arrangement into an exclusive relationship and that accepting his proposal would require ending her involvement with another romantic tie.", "desire": "Clara wants the current non-exclusive understanding to remain recognized so she does not h... | images/scenario_014/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_014/individual/character_01.jpg", "Daniel": "images/scenario_014/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_26 | scenario_014 | medium | Persuasion | 2 | Clara; Daniel | Inside the college residence, a private conversation near the doorway turns into a direct dispute over the terms of Clara and Daniel's relationship. As Clara maintains the non-exclusive arrangement she believes they already had, Daniel argues that their relationship should instead become exclusive and take priority ove... | {"Clara": "Respondent", "Daniel": "Proponent"} | {"Clara": "Honest Signaling", "Daniel": "Exaggeration"} | {"Clara": "Collaborating", "Daniel": "Competing"} | {"Clara": {"age": "26", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "college student"}, "Daniel": {"age": "27", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "college student"}} | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Daniel": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Daniel": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara states that Clara understands the relationship as non-exclusive and explicitly denies any prior promise of exclusivity without omitting the existing terms Clara believes were already understood.", "Daniel": "Daniel intensifies the importance and seriousness of exclusivity in Daniel's statements so Clar... | {"Clara": "Clara frames the dispute as clarifying the existing arrangement and insists on preserving the non-exclusive terms while inviting Daniel to address the mismatch in understanding directly.", "Daniel": "Daniel presses Clara to prioritize Daniel over other romantic ties and argues for exclusivity as the expected... | {"Clara": "Clara monitors Daniel for interruptions, repeated reframing toward exclusivity, fixed gaze, or tension near the doorway and responds by slowing the exchange, restating the prior non-exclusive understanding, and tightening the wording of Clara's boundary.", "Daniel": "Daniel watches for Clara's hesitation, di... | {"Clara": "Clara and Daniel reach an explicitly stated point in the doorway dispute where Clara's repeated clarification and boundary-setting lead both Clara and Daniel to verbally acknowledge that Clara does not accept exclusivity as the current relationship term.", "Daniel": "Daniel and Clara reach an explicitly stat... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Clara believes Daniel is trying to change their current arrangement into an exclusive relationship while she understands their connection as one that does not require giving up other romantic ties.", "desire": "Clara wants the terms of their relationship to remain consistent with the non-exclusive... | images/scenario_014/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_014/individual/character_01.jpg", "Daniel": "images/scenario_014/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_27 | scenario_059 | medium | Eristic | 3 | Elena; Lila; Ethan | As the evening winds down in the shared living area, Elena heads toward her room after leaving her shoes behind, and Lila treats the small mess as a valid point of criticism rather than overlooking it. With others still nearby, the exchange narrows into a petty dispute over shared-space conduct until Ethan ends it by d... | {"Elena": "Quarreller", "Ethan": "Auxiliary", "Lila": "Quarreller"} | {"Elena": "Suppression", "Ethan": "Suppression", "Lila": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Elena": "Collaborating", "Ethan": "Accommodating", "Lila": "Competing"} | {"Elena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "restaurant manager"}, "Ethan": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "university lecturer"}, "Lil... | {"Elena": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Elena": "Elena suppresses any detailed defense by using brief minimizing replies and restrained facial cues so the shoes issue appears minor rather than identity-defining.", "Ethan": "Ethan suppresses any extended evaluation of either side and delivers a brief dismissive framing that marks the dispute as insignifican... | {"Elena": "Elena takes a collaborating stance by framing the shoes as a small shared-space lapse that can be corrected without turning the exchange into a broader judgment of apartment conduct.", "Ethan": "Ethan takes an accommodating stance by prioritizing group settling over personal point-scoring and steering the ex... | {"Elena": "Elena monitors Lila's interruptions, reframing, stare, and posture tension along with others' gaze shifts, and Elena shortens responses or offers a quick corrective close when signals show the criticism is gaining traction.", "Ethan": "Ethan watches for overlap, hesitation, reframing, tightened posture, and ... | {"Elena": "Elena, through brief minimizing replies and a quick corrective close, reaches an interaction outcome in which Lila's criticism is answered without broadening into a wider judgment of Elena's conduct, and Ethan's dismissive close leaves the others treating the shoes issue as minor.", "Ethan": "Ethan, by timin... | {"Elena": {"belief": "Elena believes Lila is using the shoes left behind as grounds to criticize her in front of the others as she leaves the shared space.", "desire": "Elena wants the issue to remain minor and not define how others judge her conduct in the apartment.", "intention": "Elena forms the intention to keep t... | images/scenario_059/group_labeled.png | {"Elena": "images/scenario_059/individual/character_01.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_059/individual/character_03.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_059/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_28 | scenario_059 | medium | Eristic | 3 | Elena; Lila; Ethan | As the late-night hangout winds down in the shared living area, Elena leaves her shoes behind while heading off, and Lila treats the small mess as a criticism she wants acknowledged rather than ignored. With Ethan nearby as the exchange turns into a petty public dispute, he ends it by framing the matter as not worth fu... | {"Elena": "Quarreller", "Ethan": "Auxiliary", "Lila": "Quarreller"} | {"Elena": "Exaggeration", "Ethan": "Strategic Withholding", "Lila": "Deception"} | {"Elena": "Competing", "Ethan": "Accommodating", "Lila": "Collaborating"} | {"Elena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "restaurant manager"}, "Ethan": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "university lecturer"... | {"Elena": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Elena": "Elena must amplify how minor and ordinary the shoes issue is while downplaying any basis for criticism so Elena's words and dismissive cues make concession less likely.", "Ethan": "Ethan must omit any extended judgment about who is right and selectively state only that the dispute is not worth further attent... | {"Elena": "Elena must directly challenge Lila's complaint framing and hold Elena's position in the exchange without yielding social ground in front of Ethan.", "Ethan": "Ethan must prioritize ending the dispute and preserving the shared atmosphere by yielding substantive evaluation of the shoes issue while steering bot... | {"Elena": "Elena must watch for Lila's interruptions, reframing, fixed gaze, or tightened posture and respond by escalating dismissal when pressed or shortening responses when Ethan shows signs of closing the exchange.", "Ethan": "Ethan must monitor agreement, hesitation, overlapping speech, facial tension, and posture... | {"Elena": "Elena publicly leaves the exchange with Lila's complaint not established as a decisive group judgment after Elena's amplified minimization is met by Ethan's brief closure framing and by Lila's inability to secure a clear acknowledgment in dialogue, thought descriptions, and visible disengagement cues.", "Eth... | {"Elena": {"belief": "Elena believes that Lila is publicly treating the shoes she left behind as a basis for criticism rather than a trivial oversight, and that Ethan is present as the exchange becomes more pointed.", "desire": "Elena wants the issue to be treated as minor so her standing in the group is not reduced by... | images/scenario_059/group_labeled.png | {"Elena": "images/scenario_059/individual/character_01.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_059/individual/character_03.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_059/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_29 | scenario_015 | medium | Persuasion | 2 | Clara; Ethan | Within the larger gathering, Clara and Ethan remain near the low table as their conversation narrows to whether lasting love requires sustained passion or can rest on other enduring forms of connection. Ethan presses the broader view and frames it in relation to Clara's romantic future, while Clara keeps the discussion... | {"Clara": "Respondent", "Ethan": "Proponent"} | {"Clara": "Suppression", "Ethan": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Clara": "Competing", "Ethan": "Compromising"} | {"Clara": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "urban professional"}, "Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "urban professional"}} | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must keep Clara's reservation about Ethan's broader standard partially implicit by using narrowed questions and selective acknowledgments that test whether lasting love without sustained passion meets Clara's own threshold.", "Ethan": "Ethan must state Ethan's view directly by openly asserting that las... | {"Clara": "Clara must competitively keep the exchange anchored on whether Ethan's definition is sufficient for the long-term relationship Clara would accept rather than letting Ethan generalize the issue into advice about Clara's future.", "Ethan": "Ethan must pursue a compromising stance by validating Clara's emphasis... | {"Clara": "Clara must watch for Ethan's interruptions, reframing, gaze shifts, and posture changes, then tighten or reopen Clara's questioning to pull the discussion back to Clara's standard when Ethan broadens the frame and to press specifics when Ethan shows hesitation.", "Ethan": "Ethan must track Clara's agreement ... | {"Clara": "Clara and Ethan reach a point where Ethan explicitly states whether enduring connection without sustained strong passion would satisfy Clara's standard for a future long-term relationship, and Clara's narrowed follow-up plus selective acknowledgment keep that standard as the accepted reference in the exchang... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Ethan is presenting a view of long-term love that prioritizes stability and other forms of connection over sustained intense passion, and he is applying that view to her situation by redirecting the discussion toward her romantic future.", "desire": "To clarify whether a relationship without stron... | images/scenario_015/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_015/individual/character_01.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_015/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_30 | scenario_018 | medium | Deliberation | 4 | Ethan; Jade; Clara; Daniel | In the main sitting area, the friends pause their holiday gathering to determine what the earlier invitation of a former partner means for the group's New Year's agreement. Their discussion centers on whether the original pact still governs the guest list and on reaching a clear collective position the group can follow... | {"Clara": "Deliberator", "Daniel": "Deliberator", "Ethan": "Deliberator", "Jade": "Auxiliary"} | {"Clara": "Honest Signaling", "Daniel": "Honest Signaling", "Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Jade": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Clara": "Avoiding", "Daniel": "Competing", "Ethan": "Avoiding", "Jade": "Accommodating"} | {"Clara": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Avoiding", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Restaurant manager"}, "Daniel": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "University professor"}, "Et... | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Daniel": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral", "Jade": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Daniel": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Jade": "No clear facial affect cues are available at ... | {"Clara": "Clara must clearly state that the key issue is whether the original pact still governs the guest list and repeat that focus when the discussion drifts so Clara is seen as addressing the unresolved boundary.", "Daniel": "Daniel must state directly that the group needs a definitive collective position on wheth... | {"Clara": "Clara must use an avoiding stance by keeping attention on defining the status of the prior agreement rather than escalating into personal blame while still pushing for clarification before further planning continues.", "Daniel": "Daniel must take a competing stance by pressing for a decisive interpretation t... | {"Clara": "Clara must track interruptions, hesitation, crossed arms, gaze aversion, or mounting tension and respond by shortening points, returning to the core question, or waiting for a calmer opening before restating the need for clarification.", "Daniel": "Daniel must watch for interruption, resistance, reframing, r... | {"Clara": "Clara must help secure a group clarification, stated by Ethan, Jade, and Daniel in dialogue, about whether the original pact still governs the guest list, with the conversation visibly returning to that core question and further planning resuming on that basis.", "Daniel": "Daniel must help produce a definit... | {"Clara": {"belief": "The former partner's invitation puts the group's original agreement into question and requires clarification before further planning can continue.", "desire": "To have the group clarify whether the original pact still governs the guest list.", "intention": "To keep the conversation focused on defi... | images/scenario_018/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_018/individual/character_03.jpg", "Daniel": "images/scenario_018/individual/character_04.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_018/individual/character_01.jpg", "Jade": "images/scenario_018/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_31 | scenario_060 | medium | Eristic | 2 | Ethan; Liam | Near the living area, Ethan's late arrival in a festive outfit with jingling shoes immediately draws the room's attention, making his entrance a public test of status. Liam answers with exaggerated ridicule to shape how the moment is read, and Ethan selectively flaunts the bells in return, turning the exchange into a d... | {"Ethan": "Quarreller", "Liam": "Quarreller"} | {"Ethan": "Strategic Withholding", "Liam": "Suppression"} | {"Ethan": "Competing", "Liam": "Collaborating"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "actor"}, "Liam": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "actor"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Liam": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Liam": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must reveal only selective details about the bells and the timing of the entrance in replies and gestures so the display appears deliberate without fully explaining himself.", "Liam": "Liam must keep mockery controlled and indirect by downplaying overt investment in dialogue and expression while still ... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must keep pressing for interpretive control by answering Liam in a self-advancing, contest-framing way that resists conceding status or definitional ground.", "Liam": "Liam must position the exchange as a jointly readable performance by shaping the frame through measured ridicule that preserves Liam's ... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must watch Liam's interruptions, reframing, gaze, and posture shifts, then increase or reduce bell display and verbal specificity to maintain control when Liam gains traction or pause when Liam's signals weaken.", "Liam": "Liam must track Ethan's sharp replies, selective bell flaunting, facial changes,... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Liam must arrive at a publicly readable exchange in which Liam's ridicule is answered by Ethan's selective bell display and replies strongly enough that the room can observe Ethan retaining interpretive control without Liam ending the contest.", "Liam": "Liam and Ethan must produce a publicly reada... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "He believes his late, attention-grabbing entrance has put him at the center of the room's evaluation and that Liam's ridicule is a public challenge rather than casual joking.", "desire": "He wants the exchange to affirm his standing in front of the group by making his costume and response read as ... | images/scenario_060/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_060/individual/character_01.jpg", "Liam": "images/scenario_060/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_32 | scenario_019 | medium | Persuasion | 2 | Ethan; Lila | In a quiet corner of the science building near the board and work surfaces, Ethan answers Lila's challenge by making his position explicit rather than leaving it implied. The discussion shifts from theoretical reasoning to a dispute over whether his carefully stated standard for the right moment is legitimate or should... | {"Ethan": "Proponent", "Lila": "Respondent"} | {"Ethan": "Exaggeration", "Lila": "Deception"} | {"Ethan": "Collaborating", "Lila": "Competing"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "physicist"}, "Lila": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "physics student"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must restate his timing standard with amplified detail and emphasis so his explicit defense appears principled rather than evasive.", "Lila": "Lila must present Ethan's explicit answer as if it already demonstrates the need for immediate commitment while withholding any acknowledgment that his standard... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must position the dispute as a joint evaluation of whether his stated conditions are valid, inviting examination instead of conceding to an immediate commitment demand.", "Lila": "Lila must press for a present yes-or-no commitment and treat further defense of timing conditions as insufficient, prioriti... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Lila's interruptions, reframing, fixed gaze, or posture tightening and then adjust by slowing his pace, sharpening examples, or directly re-centering the exchange on the legitimacy of his standard.", "Lila": "Lila must monitor Ethan's hesitations, elaborations, gaze shifts, or attempts t... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Lila openly settle the dispute into a shared interactional focus where Ethan's amplified restatement, collaborative invitations, and visible re-centering moves make Lila answer the legitimacy of Ethan's timing standard directly instead of leaving the exchange framed only as a demand for immediate c... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "He believes Lila is directly challenging the consistency between the standard he has articulated and what he is willing to acknowledge or do now.", "desire": "He wants the exchange to accept his stated standard for the right moment as justified rather than as an evasion.", "intention": "He intends... | images/scenario_019/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_019/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_019/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_33 | scenario_019 | medium | Persuasion | 2 | Ethan; Lila | In a quiet department corner by the board and work surfaces, Ethan responds after making his answer explicit, which shifts the exchange from theoretical physics to a dispute over whether his stated condition for the right moment is a valid basis for delay. Lila presses the issue as one of present acknowledgment, while ... | {"Ethan": "Proponent", "Lila": "Respondent"} | {"Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Lila": "Suppression"} | {"Ethan": "Competing", "Lila": "Collaborating"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "physicist"}, "Lila": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "physics student"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must state his criterion for the right moment in direct and consistent terms, openly linking delay to that criterion rather than obscuring or softening the basis of his position.", "Lila": "Lila must keep her challenge indirect but clear by selectively withholding broader commentary and repeatedly stee... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must keep the exchange anchored on the legitimacy of his stated standard and argue against immediate acknowledgment when Lila frames delay as evasion.", "Lila": "Lila must frame the dispute as a joint test of whether Ethan's criterion fits the present exchange and push for immediate acknowledgment with... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Lila's interruptions, reframing, narrowed gaze, or forward-leaning posture and respond by tightening his wording, repeating the criterion, or pausing before restating why waiting remains appropriate.", "Lila": "Lila must monitor Ethan's hesitations, counter-reframing, gaze shifts, or bod... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Lila reach an explicit exchange in which Ethan's repeated direct statements of the right-moment criterion are answered by Lila's focused challenge on present acknowledgment, making the dispute visibly settle on whether Ethan's standard counts as a legitimate basis for delay rather than an evasion."... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Lila is directly challenging whether his stated standard for the right moment is justified in this conversation, and his choice to make his answer explicit has made his position open to scrutiny beyond the original scientific topic.", "desire": "To have his standard treated as a legitimate basis f... | images/scenario_019/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_019/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_019/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_34 | scenario_020 | medium | Deliberation | 2 | Ethan; Lena | At a lab worktable crowded with tools and documents, Ethan and Lena briefly negotiate what needs to be moved so the surface can be used for their immediate interaction without undermining the professional setting. Their exchange stays focused on reaching workable agreement at the bench as the shared space is made avail... | {"Ethan": "Deliberator", "Lena": "Deliberator"} | {"Ethan": "Suppression", "Lena": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ethan": "Compromising", "Lena": "Competing"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Research Scientist"}, "Lena": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Lab Technician"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Lena": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan should state only the minimum needed about which tools and documents can be shifted, keeping preferences indirect so agreement is reached without exposing a firm personal claim over the bench.", "Lena": "Lena should plainly specify which items must be moved and which surface area is needed, making her ... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should propose a middle-ground arrangement that accepts partial movement of items and signals willingness to concede details in order to secure a workable shared surface quickly.", "Lena": "Lena should anchor the negotiation around her preferred clearing plan and press for recognition of that plan with... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should watch Lena for interruption, hesitation, gaze fixation on specific items, or posture tightening and then shorten proposals, soften wording, or pause to let Lena specify nonnegotiable placements.", "Lena": "Lena should monitor Ethan for agreement tokens, reframing attempts, delayed responses, or ... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Lena reach an explicit bench-clearing agreement in which Lena identifies the items and space requirements, Ethan accepts a middle-ground arrangement with softened wording and pauses that let Lena mark nonnegotiable placements, and both participants show the shared surface is usable through confirmi... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "The lab bench is currently obstructed by tools and documents, and he and Lena need a workable shared surface before proceeding with their immediate interaction.", "desire": "To establish quick agreement with Lena on how the bench should be cleared so the interaction can continue without disrupting... | images/scenario_020/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_020/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lena": "images/scenario_020/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_35 | scenario_021 | medium | Deliberation | 2 | Elena; Ben | In the shared room, the conversation narrows to an immediate decision about whether Elena and Ben will stay there together for the evening rather than continue to other plans. Elena presses for that outcome and Ben agrees, treating the tabletop and the belongings left in the common area as part of coordinating the spac... | {"Ben": "Deliberator", "Elena": "Deliberator"} | {"Ben": "Honest Signaling", "Elena": "Deception"} | {"Ben": "Competing", "Elena": "Accommodating"} | {"Ben": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "graphic designer"}, "Elena": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "freelance writer"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben should state plainly that Ben agrees to stay and explicitly connect the tabletop and common-area belongings to that decision so Elena can recognize the commitment as genuine and operative.", "Elena": "Elena should present staying together as the natural immediate option while omitting uncertainty about Ben... | {"Ben": "Ben should take a controlling role in ratifying the plan by defining how the shared space will be used and treating that coordination as the decisive confirmation of staying together.", "Elena": "Elena should accommodate Ben's acceptance terms by framing the decision to stay as workable and easy for Ben to end... | {"Ben": "Ben should monitor Elena's agreement, reframing, pauses, facial tension, and gaze toward the shared room and adjust the speed and firmness of Ben's coordination talk to remove ambiguity and keep the decision recognized.", "Elena": "Elena should watch for Ben's hesitation, interruptions, gaze shifts toward the ... | {"Ben": "Ben produces an observable ratification of staying together for the evening when Ben's explicit agreement and coordination of the tabletop and common-area belongings are accepted by Elena as confirmation that the shared room will be used by both of them.", "Elena": "Elena secures a mutually recognized decision... | {"Ben": {"belief": "Elena wants an immediate decision to stay together, and accepting that choice requires making the shared space available for them.", "desire": "To confirm a mutually recognized plan to stay and align the space with that decision.", "intention": "To ratify Elena's proposal through practical coordinat... | images/scenario_021/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_021/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_021/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_36 | scenario_061 | medium | Eristic | 2 | Elena; Clara | At the bedside, Elena and Clara treat the private hospital-room conversation as a direct contest over whose claims about the resting man will carry more weight. Each withholds full commitment while offering increasingly pointed assertions, turning the quiet visit into a struggle for conversational advantage around the ... | {"Clara": "Quarreller", "Elena": "Quarreller"} | {"Clara": "Strategic Withholding", "Elena": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Clara": "Competing", "Elena": "Collaborating"} | {"Clara": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "female", "occupation": "artist"}, "Elena": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "female", "occupation": "writer"}} | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must offer carefully chosen claims about the patient while withholding full commitment and supporting detail so Clara can press advantage without giving Elena easy openings.", "Elena": "Elena must state selectively framed observations about the patient while omitting full justification so Elena can pro... | {"Clara": "Clara must answer Elena in a self-advancing, contest-oriented way that pushes Clara's reading of the patient as stronger regardless of relational cost.", "Elena": "Elena must position the exchange as a joint evaluation of the patient while steering the discussion toward Elena's account as the most credible o... | {"Clara": "Clara must track Elena's agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframing, gaze direction, posture shifts, and facial tension, then escalate, sharpen, or briefly hold back claims to preserve conversational dominance.", "Elena": "Elena must watch Clara's agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframing, gaze shif... | {"Clara": "Clara and Elena reach a visibly contested but recognizable exchange state in which Elena continues answering Clara's carefully sharpened claims, while the dialogue, both women's internal assessments, and Elena's hesitation, posture shifts, or facial tension support that Clara's reading of the patient is carr... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Elena is using the bedside conversation to gain the upper hand through increasingly assertive claims about the patient, and the enclosed room makes the exchange a direct contest between them.", "desire": "To have her own reading of the patient recognized as the stronger and more compelling one in ... | images/scenario_061/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_061/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_061/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_37 | scenario_062 | medium | Eristic | 3 | Ethan; Lila; Clara | At Ethan's bedside, Lila and Clara challenge his flat farewell as an attempt to close the visit without adequately recognizing their effort and the promises they believe still matter. In the cramped space beside the bed and tray table, the attempted goodbye turns into a confrontation over what Ethan owes them and wheth... | {"Clara": "Quarreller", "Ethan": "Quarreller", "Lila": "Quarreller"} | {"Clara": "Exaggeration", "Ethan": "Suppression", "Lila": "Suppression"} | {"Clara": "Competing", "Ethan": "Collaborating", "Lila": "Collaborating"} | {"Clara": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Event Coordinator"}, "Ethan": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Student"}, "Lila": {"age": ... | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must amplify the significance of Ethan's wording and the prior effort and promises so Ethan's reduced account of obligation cannot pass as adequate on the record of the exchange.", "Ethan": "Ethan must keep responses brief and selectively incomplete so Ethan preserves a minimal account of obligation wi... | {"Clara": "Clara must press Ethan competitively for a direct statement of reciprocity by challenging minimizing language and resisting any move to close the conversation on Ethan's terms.", "Ethan": "Ethan must position Ethan's stance as a boundary-setting clarification that invites closure while resisting any statemen... | {"Clara": "Clara must monitor Ethan's interruption attempts, evasive phrasing, posture shifts toward ending the visit, or downward gaze, and Clara must answer by increasing directness, tightening questions, or cutting off closure bids until the obligation is stated openly.", "Ethan": "Ethan must watch for interruption,... | {"Clara": "Clara drives the interaction with Ethan and Lila to an open dispute over obligation in which the dialogue, Clara's sharpened challenges, Lila's reinforcing focus, and Ethan's constrained replies make Ethan's minimizing account unable to stand as the uncontested closing terms of the visit.", "Ethan": "Ethan l... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Ethan is trying to close the interaction on terms that sidestep what he owes in light of prior effort and promises.", "desire": "To establish that Ethan cannot leave the exchange without directly answering for the reciprocity they expect.", "intention": "To intensify the challenge to Ethan's wordi... | images/scenario_062/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_062/individual/character_03.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_062/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_062/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_38 | scenario_062 | medium | Eristic | 3 | Ethan; Lila; Clara | At Ethan's bedside, Lila and Clara challenge his flat parting words as an inadequate acknowledgment of effort and promises, pushing the goodbye into a dispute over what he owes them in return. In the cramped space beside the bed and tray table, Ethan resists expanding that obligation while Lila seeks recognition and Cl... | {"Clara": "Quarreller", "Ethan": "Quarreller", "Lila": "Quarreller"} | {"Clara": "Honest Signaling", "Ethan": "Suppression", "Lila": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Clara": "Collaborating", "Ethan": "Competing", "Lila": "Competing"} | {"Clara": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Event Coordinator"}, "Ethan": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Student"}, "Lila": {"ag... | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must use honest signaling by stating plainly that Ethan's goodbye is too slight and by directly naming the unresolved effort and promises that need clarification.", "Ethan": "Ethan must keep Ethan's wording brief and noncommittal while avoiding explicit expansion on effort or promises, showing suppress... | {"Clara": "Clara must enact a collaborating position by framing the dispute as a need for mutual clarification and accountable closure rather than a contest over who can end the exchange first.", "Ethan": "Ethan must maintain a competing position by repeatedly framing Ethan's farewell as already sufficient and rejectin... | {"Clara": "Clara must track agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframing, gaze shifts, posture changes, or visible tension from Ethan and Lila and adjust by slowing the pace, rephrasing for specificity, or redirecting turn-taking toward clear answers.", "Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Lila's or Clara's interruptions, ... | {"Clara": "Clara's direct requests for accountable closure, together with Lila's pressure and Ethan's narrowed replies, must result in the three-way exchange ending with explicit spoken clarification that the goodbye remains disputed because effort and promises have been named but not mutually resolved.", "Ethan": "Eth... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Ethan's parting words are too slight for the situation and leave unresolved questions about effort and promises between the three of them.", "desire": "To obtain a clearer and more accountable closing to the interaction that addresses what each person reasonably expects.", "intention": "To press f... | images/scenario_062/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_062/individual/character_03.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_062/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_062/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_39 | scenario_024 | medium | Information-seeking | 2 | Elena; Ben | Near the entry area, Elena receives from Ben a dish, some books, and a message from someone not present as items are being brought in for the gathering. In the exchange, she asks whether the dish is vegetarian so she can determine if it is suitable for Susan and place Ben's contribution appropriately within the plans. | {"Ben": "Answerer", "Elena": "Questioner"} | {"Ben": "Exaggeration", "Elena": "Deception"} | {"Ben": "Avoiding", "Elena": "Competing"} | {"Ben": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Avoiding", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "professor"}, "Elena": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "homemaker"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben should use exaggeration to describe the dish's suitability in stronger terms than the available specifics while still giving Elena an answer about whether the dish is vegetarian.", "Elena": "Elena should use deceptive phrasing or selective emphasis to present the vegetarian-status question as a simple plac... | {"Ben": "Ben should enact an avoiding strategy by giving the shortest answer that can settle Elena's question and moving away from extended scrutiny about the dish's status.", "Elena": "Elena should pursue a competing position by pressing for an unambiguous confirmation that lets Elena control how Ben's contribution is... | {"Ben": "Ben should watch Elena for repeated questioning, skeptical reframing, fixed gaze, or a pause before placing the dish, and Ben should respond by reducing detail, softening certainty, or briefly restating the answer to end the exchange.", "Elena": "Elena should monitor Ben for hesitation, interruption, gaze shif... | {"Ben": "Ben gives Elena a dialogue-confirmed answer that leads Elena to place the delivered dish within the gathering arrangements for Susan's needs, with Ben's brief restatement and Elena's subsequent handling of the items making the acceptance of Ben's contribution observable to both participants.", "Elena": "Elena ... | {"Ben": {"belief": "Elena is checking whether the dish he delivered is appropriate for Susan, and his reply will determine how the contribution is understood.", "desire": "To have his delivery accepted as suitable and properly accounted for within the gathering's arrangements.", "intention": "To provide an answer that ... | images/scenario_024/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_024/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_024/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_40 | scenario_025 | medium | Persuasion | 2 | Ethan; Mason | In the apartment's open kitchen and dining area, Ethan argues that Mason should pay to replace the damaged table because Mason's earlier involvement caused the damage. Mason disputes that standard by insisting that an informal ownership rule decides liability, and their exchange focuses on getting the other to accept t... | {"Ethan": "Proponent", "Mason": "Respondent"} | {"Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Mason": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ethan": "Collaborating", "Mason": "Competing"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "office worker"}, "Mason": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "actor"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Mason": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Mason": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Mason at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must state plainly that Mason's earlier involvement is the basis for payment liability and avoid omitting or distorting details that support Ethan's claim about replacement cost responsibility.", "Mason": "Mason must state directly that an informal ownership rule determines liability and avoid withhold... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must pursue a collaborating stance by inviting Mason to evaluate causal responsibility as a shared standard for deciding who should replace the damaged table.", "Mason": "Mason must pursue a competing stance by pressing the ownership-based rule as the decisive standard and resisting movement toward Eth... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Mason's agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframing, gaze shifts, posture changes, and tension cues, then slow down, restate the causal basis, or ask a clarifying question to keep the discussion on liability rather than ownership.", "Mason": "Mason must track Ethan's agreement, hesita... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Mason end the exchange with the dispute explicitly centered on whether Mason's earlier involvement makes Mason liable, shown by Ethan's clear restatement, Mason's direct response to that causal standard, and both participants' verbal acknowledgments or observable pause, gaze, and posture shifts ind... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Mason's earlier involvement led to the table being damaged, so Mason is the liable party in this dispute.", "desire": "To establish shared agreement that Mason should cover the replacement cost.", "intention": "To maintain the argument that causal responsibility determines payment liability in thi... | images/scenario_025/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_025/individual/character_01.jpg", "Mason": "images/scenario_025/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_41 | scenario_025 | medium | Persuasion | 2 | Ethan; Mason | Near the kitchen and dining area, Ethan argues that Mason should cover the replacement cost because the table damage is tied to Mason's earlier involvement there that morning. Mason challenges that claim by insisting an informal ownership rule governs liability, and the dispute turns on which standard for responsibilit... | {"Ethan": "Proponent", "Mason": "Respondent"} | {"Ethan": "Strategic Withholding", "Mason": "Deception"} | {"Ethan": "Compromising", "Mason": "Competing"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "office worker"}, "Mason": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "actor"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Mason": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "There are no clear facial affect cues available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Mason": "There are no clear facial affect cues available for Mason at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan should selectively state the sequence linking Mason's earlier involvement to the damage while withholding weaker points that could support the ownership-based rule.", "Mason": "Mason should present the ownership rule as the governing standard and speak as if that standard clearly excludes Mason's payme... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should pursue a middle-ground liability frame by pressing for Mason's payment responsibility while signaling openness to a practical resolution that protects Ethan's standing on shared-property responsibility.", "Mason": "Mason should forcefully anchor the dispute on the ownership rule, reject Ethan's ... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should watch for Mason's interruptions, hesitation, rule reframing, gaze shifts, and posture tightening, then shorten or restate the sequence-based claim and moderate pressure to keep the discussion on responsibility rather than ownership.", "Mason": "Mason should track Ethan's agreement bids, hesitati... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Mason reach an explicit point in the argument where Mason verbally addresses Ethan's sequence-based responsibility claim rather than only repeating the ownership rule, making the standard for liability under dispute jointly visible in both speakers' statements and responses.", "Mason": "Mason and E... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Ethan believes the table damage is being discussed as a matter of liability because it followed Mason's earlier involvement near the dining area, and he believes Mason is contesting that responsibility by invoking an ownership-based rule.", "desire": "Ethan wants agreement that Mason is responsibl... | images/scenario_025/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_025/individual/character_01.jpg", "Mason": "images/scenario_025/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_42 | scenario_028 | medium | Deliberation | 2 | Ethan; Liam | In the showroom, Ethan and Liam focus on a small group of nearby dining tables and narrow their discussion to whether bird motifs or ladybugs are the better choice for the meal setting. Their exchange centers on settling the shared selection, with Ethan signaling his actual view while trying to avoid an extended disput... | {"Ethan": "Deliberator", "Liam": "Deliberator"} | {"Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Liam": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ethan": "Avoiding", "Liam": "Competing"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Avoiding", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "unspecified"}, "Liam": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "unspecified"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Liam": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Liam": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must state Ethan's actual motif preference directly and briefly while limiting added detail so the choice is clear without inviting a prolonged dispute.", "Liam": "Liam must state Liam's true preferred motif explicitly and support it with clear comparative claims that keep the preference unmistakable i... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must position Ethan's response around closing on a workable table choice quickly rather than contesting Liam's advocacy point by point.", "Liam": "Liam must hold a firm position and press Liam's preferred table setting as the selection until the joint choice is settled."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Liam's interruption, repeated reframing, fixed gaze, or forward-leaning posture and then shorten Ethan's wording, lower argumentative intensity, or redirect to settling the selection.", "Liam": "Liam must monitor Ethan's agreement, hesitation, cutoff attempts, gaze withdrawal, or posture... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Liam arrive at an explicit shared selection between the bird-motif and ladybug-motif tables after Ethan states Ethan's actual preference briefly and redirects the exchange away from point-by-point dispute, with the outcome verifiable through both speakers' wording and their observable reduction in ... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "The current decision is specifically between nearby dining tables with bird motifs and ladybug motifs, and Liam is openly advocating for one option in the discussion.", "desire": "To reach a table choice without becoming locked into a prolonged direct dispute over the decorative theme.", "intentio... | images/scenario_028/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_028/individual/character_01.jpg", "Liam": "images/scenario_028/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_43 | scenario_029 | medium | Persuasion | 2 | Ethan Carter; Robert Miller | Near a doorway off the main living area, Ethan Carter stops Robert Miller and presents the issue as an immediate choice: end the relationship with Ronni or tell Ethan Carter's mother by the next day. In the tight space beside household storage, Robert Miller faces the ultimatum as Ethan Carter presses for a definite re... | {"Ethan Carter": "Proponent", "Robert Miller": "Respondent"} | {"Ethan Carter": "Exaggeration", "Robert Miller": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ethan Carter": "Collaborating", "Robert Miller": "Competing"} | {"Ethan Carter": {"age": "20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "college student"}, "Robert Miller": {"age": "50s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "small business owner"}} | {"Ethan Carter": "Neutral", "Robert Miller": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan Carter": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Robert Miller": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan Carter": "Ethan Carter must state the next-day deadline and the two-option choice in amplified, absolute terms that make delay sound fully unacceptable while avoiding any wording that weakens enforceability.", "Robert Miller": "Robert Miller must state Robert Miller's position plainly and truthfully about the u... | {"Ethan Carter": "Ethan Carter must pursue a collaborating stance by framing the ultimatum as a household honesty problem requiring Robert Miller to commit to one concrete option and accept Ethan Carter's direction for the night.", "Robert Miller": "Robert Miller must take a competing stance by challenging Ethan Carter... | {"Ethan Carter": "Ethan Carter must watch for Robert Miller's agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframing, gaze breaks, posture resistance, or jaw tension and then tighten timing, restate the two options, or redirect Robert Miller to his room to prevent evasion.", "Robert Miller": "Robert Miller must track Ethan Car... | {"Ethan Carter": "Ethan Carter must bring the exchange to an observable close in which Robert Miller verbally acknowledges the two-option next-day decision as the live issue and then physically withdraws toward Robert Miller's room after Ethan Carter restates the deadline and directs the night-time separation.", "Rober... | {"Ethan Carter": {"belief": "Robert Miller is maintaining a secret relationship with Ronni and must be made to commit immediately to either ending it or admitting it to Ethan Carter's mother by the next day.", "desire": "To establish a clear and enforceable resolution that protects honesty within the household by forci... | images/scenario_029/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan Carter": "images/scenario_029/individual/character_01.jpg", "Robert Miller": "images/scenario_029/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_44 | scenario_031 | medium | Persuasion | 2 | Ethan; Ben | In a tucked-away corner of the lounge, Ethan presses Ben to accept a reassuring view of commitment by comparing marriage to an earlier career choice, treating the issue as one of consistency under pressure. Ben stays engaged without fully conceding, and their serious exchange is softened by teasing familiarity that bri... | {"Ben": "Respondent", "Ethan": "Proponent"} | {"Ben": "Honest Signaling", "Ethan": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ben": "Compromising", "Ethan": "Competing"} | {"Ben": {"age": "thirties", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "actor"}, "Ethan": {"age": "thirties", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "writer"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben must answer Ethan's comparison truthfully by acknowledging engagement with the argument while clearly stating that Ben is not fully accepting the commitment framing.", "Ethan": "Ethan must state the marriage-career comparison plainly and directly, making Ben's uncertainty and Ethan's manageable-choice fram... | {"Ben": "Ben must preserve Ben's position by offering partial acknowledgment or limited concession that keeps the conversation smooth without surrendering control of Ben's stance.", "Ethan": "Ethan must keep the exchange centered on Ethan's comparison and press Ben for consistency under pressure even if Ben resists, so... | {"Ben": "Ben must track Ethan's direct presses, reframing, interruptions, facial tightening, gaze focus, or posture shifts and respond by timing replies carefully, using brief teasing or partial agreement, or restating boundaries to avoid escalation while maintaining clarity.", "Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Ben's agre... | {"Ben": "Ben leaves Ethan recognizing that Ben has engaged the marriage-career comparison seriously without conceding the core commitment framing, with this outcome evidenced by Ben's explicit qualified reply, Ethan's continued but moderated presses, and both participants' teasing cues that keep the conversation smooth... | {"Ben": {"belief": "Ethan is trying to persuade him that marriage should be understood through the same logic as a prior decision about his career.", "desire": "Ben wants to respond without escalating the disagreement while preserving his own position on commitment.", "intention": "Ben commits to engaging with Ethan's ... | images/scenario_031/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_031/individual/character_02.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_031/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_45 | scenario_063 | medium | Persuasion | 2 | Ethan; Lila | Seated together on a shared couch, Lila raises her friends' disapproval of Ethan and defends her own view of him while pressing the question of whether those outside criticisms should count. Their conversation takes on the structure of a private relational dispute within the larger gathering, with each trying to define... | {"Ethan": "Respondent", "Lila": "Proponent"} | {"Ethan": "Exaggeration", "Lila": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Ethan": "Compromising", "Lila": "Competing"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "40s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Musician"}, "Lila": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Writer"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan should use exaggeration to overstate how unfair or irrelevant outside criticisms are while avoiding direct contradiction of Lila's account so that his dialogue visibly pushes the conversation toward judging the relationship by Ethan and Lila's own standards.", "Lila": "Lila should use strategic withhol... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should take a compromising stance by acknowledging that Lila's friends can have opinions but proposing that only Ethan and Lila should decide how much those opinions count in evaluating the relationship.", "Lila": "Lila should take a competing stance by pressing Ethan to address whether external critic... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should watch for Lila's agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframing, gaze shifts, posture tightening, or facial tension and then soften, intensify, or restate Ethan's point to keep the focus on mutual evaluation rather than outside judgment.", "Lila": "Lila should monitor Ethan's agreement, hesitati... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Lila reach an explicitly stated conversational position, supported by Ethan's exaggerated reframing, Lila's responses, and both participants' visible cues, that her friends' disapproval can be acknowledged but cannot by itself determine how Ethan and Lila evaluate the relationship.", "Lila": "Lila ... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Lila is introducing her friends' disapproval as a relevant factor in how their relationship should be evaluated during this conversation.", "desire": "To establish that outside criticisms should not determine how he and Lila assess their relationship in front of the group setting.", "intention": "... | images/scenario_063/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_063/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_063/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_46 | scenario_032 | medium | Persuasion | 3 | Elena; Lila; Mia | In the coffeehouse seating area, Elena and Lila argue that Mia should judge the renewed date invitation by the man's earlier behavior rather than by the timing of Valentine's Day. As they press that shared point, Mia keeps the conversation centered on whether the offer deserves reconsideration on its own terms. | {"Elena": "Proponent", "Lila": "Auxiliary", "Mia": "Respondent"} | {"Elena": "Strategic Withholding", "Lila": "Suppression", "Mia": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Elena": "Collaborating", "Lila": "Accommodating", "Mia": "Competing"} | {"Elena": {"age": "28", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "female", "occupation": "restaurant manager"}, "Lila": {"age": "26", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "fashion assistant"}, "Mia": {"... | {"Elena": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral", "Mia": "Neutral"} | {"Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Mia": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Elena": "Elena should selectively mention the man's earlier behavior and the shift caused by Valentine's Day while omitting side points that could weaken Elena's case that Mia should keep the prior standard.", "Lila": "Lila should keep Lila's support understated by briefly echoing the caution about the man's earlier ... | {"Elena": "Elena should position Elena's argument as a joint evaluation with Mia by linking Mia's current choice to the man's earlier behavior and inviting Mia to test the invitation against that standard.", "Lila": "Lila should strategically back Elena's position through small agreements and mild reinforcing statement... | {"Elena": "Elena should watch for Mia's interruptions, hesitation, gaze breaks, or posture tightening and then either slow the pace and ask a clarifying question or restate the inconsistency more directly if Mia reframes the issue around the holiday.", "Lila": "Lila should monitor Elena's pacing and Mia's agreement cue... | {"Elena": "Elena should bring the exchange to a point where Elena and Lila both state that the man's earlier behavior matters more than Valentine's Day timing and Mia explicitly responds to that standard while continuing to test whether the renewed invitation merits reconsideration.", "Lila": "Lila should help produce ... | {"Elena": {"belief": "Mia is reconsidering a date invitation from someone she had previously rejected, and the approach of Valentine's Day is influencing how the offer is being discussed.", "desire": "Mia to evaluate the invitation based on the man's earlier behavior rather than treating the holiday as sufficient justi... | images/scenario_032/group_labeled.png | {"Elena": "images/scenario_032/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_032/individual/character_02.jpg", "Mia": "images/scenario_032/individual/character_03.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_47 | scenario_032 | medium | Persuasion | 3 | Elena; Lila; Mia | At a low table in the coffeehouse seating area, Elena and Lila argue that Mia should treat the renewed date invitation according to the man's earlier behavior and her prior rejection, not the Valentine's timing. As they reinforce that position together, Mia keeps the decision open enough to avoid letting her friends fu... | {"Elena": "Proponent", "Lila": "Auxiliary", "Mia": "Respondent"} | {"Elena": "Deception", "Lila": "Suppression", "Mia": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Elena": "Compromising", "Lila": "Accommodating", "Mia": "Competing"} | {"Elena": {"age": "28", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "restaurant manager"}, "Lila": {"age": "26", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "fashion assistant"}, "Mia": {"age": "27", "... | {"Elena": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral", "Mia": "Neutral"} | {"Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Mia": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Mia at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Elena": "Elena should present Mia's possible acceptance as merely impractical or inconsistent while concealing how strongly Elena wants Valentine's timing excluded from Mia's judgment.", "Lila": "Lila should back Elena's case with brief, indirect agreement while withholding any fuller personal reasoning so the anti-a... | {"Elena": "Elena should push for Mia to center the prior rejection and earlier behavior but offer limited concessions in wording so Elena's stance appears balanced rather than rigid.", "Lila": "Lila should accommodate Elena's lead by reinforcing that Mia needs stronger reasons to reverse the earlier rejection, even if ... | {"Elena": "Elena should watch for Mia's hesitation, interruptions, gaze shifts, or posture tightening and respond by softening phrasing or restating the prior rejection as the main criterion when resistance becomes visible.", "Lila": "Lila should monitor Mia's pauses, reframing, facial tension, and gaze avoidance and r... | {"Elena": "Elena and Lila visibly converge in dialogue on treating the renewed invitation by the man's earlier behavior and Mia's prior rejection, while Mia's replies and withheld rationale leave that standard stated but not accepted as the sole basis for judgment.", "Lila": "Lila and Elena establish through matching d... | {"Elena": {"belief": "Mia is reconsidering a date invitation from someone she had already rejected, and the Valentine's Day timing is influencing how the offer is being viewed despite the man's earlier behavior.", "desire": "To have Mia judge the invitation based on the prior rejection and earlier behavior rather than ... | images/scenario_032/group_labeled.png | {"Elena": "images/scenario_032/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_032/individual/character_02.jpg", "Mia": "images/scenario_032/individual/character_03.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_48 | scenario_064 | medium | Eristic | 2 | Elena; Clara | Near the main seating area, Elena and Clara frame their discussion as a comparison over which past dating experience was worse, with each treating stronger examples as socially decisive. Elena aims to make her blunt complaints read as credible and compelling, while Clara works to keep her stories dominant, so their exc... | {"Clara": "Quarreller", "Elena": "Quarreller"} | {"Clara": "Deception", "Elena": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Clara": "Competing", "Elena": "Collaborating"} | {"Clara": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "office worker"}, "Elena": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "office worker"}} | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must present stories with selectively shaped details that lead Elena toward viewing Clara's examples as harsher and more decisive without openly marking the distortion.", "Elena": "Elena must state concrete, blunt complaints in direct sequence without softening or omission so Elena's account reads as c... | {"Clara": "Clara must keep a competing position by asserting stronger comparisons, overriding Elena's framing when useful, and steering the exchange toward judgments that favor Clara's side.", "Elena": "Elena must strategically frame the exchange as a side-by-side comparison and press for clear evaluation criteria that... | {"Clara": "Clara must track Elena's agreement, interruption, counterexamples, steady gaze, or tension cues and respond by escalating emphasis, changing framing, or cutting in faster to preserve Clara's dominance in the back-and-forth.", "Elena": "Elena must watch for Clara's interruptions, hesitation, reframing, narrow... | {"Clara": "Clara and Elena move into a back-and-forth where Clara's selectively sharpened story is treated as the stronger benchmark to beat, shown by Elena responding to Clara's framing with direct counters instead of redirecting the comparison.", "Elena": "Elena and Clara explicitly treat Elena's bluntly detailed exa... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Elena is offering direct complaints that compete for attention, and the conversation rewards stories that outdo the previous one.", "desire": "To control the comparison by having her examples regarded as the sharper and more dominant account.", "intention": "To shape her side of the exchange in a ... | images/scenario_064/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_064/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_064/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_49 | scenario_064 | medium | Eristic | 2 | Elena; Clara | Near the main seating area, Elena and Clara are absorbed in a comparative exchange about the worst men they have dated, with each treating the conversation as a test of whose example carries more weight. Elena pushes for the sharper, more memorable account through heightened framing, while Clara keeps her contribution ... | {"Clara": "Quarreller", "Elena": "Quarreller"} | {"Clara": "Honest Signaling", "Elena": "Exaggeration"} | {"Clara": "Collaborating", "Elena": "Competing"} | {"Clara": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "office worker"}, "Elena": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "office worker"}} | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara should present her dating example in clear, specific, and consistent terms so the account remains directly credible without inflated claims.", "Elena": "Elena should describe her dating example with amplified wording, sharpened contrasts, and emphatic delivery so the account appears more extreme and me... | {"Clara": "Clara should keep the exchange reciprocal by acknowledging the shared comparison while positioning Clara's example as a solid and convincing contribution that Elena cannot easily dismiss.", "Elena": "Elena should press the comparison toward whose example is strongest by foregrounding the standout elements of... | {"Clara": "Clara should monitor Elena's agreement, reframing, interruptions, emphatic tone, facial tension, leaning, or gaze focus and then adjust pacing, add concrete detail, or restate the point to preserve both engagement and credibility.", "Elena": "Elena should watch for Clara's agreement, hesitation, interruption... | {"Clara": "Clara and Elena sustain a reciprocal comparison in which Elena's responses, follow-up remarks, and observable attentiveness indicate that Clara's direct story is accepted as a credible and competitive example rather than being dismissed or overshadowed.", "Elena": "Elena and Clara reach a visible point in th... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Elena is treating the conversation as a running comparison of past dating failures, and credibility within the exchange depends on offering examples that are both clear and convincing.", "desire": "To keep the exchange mutually engaging while having her account accepted as a valid and credible con... | images/scenario_064/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_064/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_064/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_50 | scenario_033 | medium | Deliberation | 3 | Lila; Clara; Sophie | In the kitchen-dining area, meal preparation continues while the three women compare possible cleansing rituals for the next night and work toward a shared decision. As the discussion narrows from playful and practical ideas, they treat burning old gifts and keepsakes from former boyfriends as the settled group plan. | {"Clara": "Deliberator", "Lila": "Deliberator", "Sophie": "Deliberator"} | {"Clara": "Deception", "Lila": "Honest Signaling", "Sophie": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Clara": "Accommodating", "Lila": "Accommodating", "Sophie": "Competing"} | {"Clara": {"age": "mid-20s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "chef"}, "Lila": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "musician"}, "Sophie": {"age": "early 30s... | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral", "Sophie": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Sophie": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Sophie at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara should verbally endorse burning old gifts and keepsakes as a practical group choice while concealing any private reservations through consistent agreement and steady task-focused behavior.", "Lila": "Lila should openly state support for burning old gifts and keepsakes as the likely ritual while verball... | {"Clara": "Clara should accommodate the group's movement toward the burning plan by minimizing Clara's own preferences and reinforcing the option as workable so Clara is not seen as obstructing alignment.", "Lila": "Lila should position Lila as supportive of the emerging burning plan by inviting shared acceptance and y... | {"Clara": "Clara should monitor agreement, hesitation, reframing, facial tension, and gaze shifts from Lila and Sophie and increase affirming statements or reduce detail whenever those cues suggest Clara's alignment might be questioned.", "Lila": "Lila should watch for agreement, hesitation, interruptions, gaze aversio... | {"Clara": "Clara brings about an observable outcome in which Clara's practical endorsement is matched by confirming responses from Lila and Sophie so burning old gifts and keepsakes stands as the finalized group ritual without Clara's reservations becoming visible in the exchange.", "Lila": "Lila reaches an observable ... | {"Clara": {"belief": "The others are comparing different ritual options and are prepared to agree on burning old gifts and keepsakes from former boyfriends.", "desire": "To have the group adopt a workable ritual without drawing attention to any private reservations she may have.", "intention": "To align her stated posi... | images/scenario_033/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_033/individual/character_02.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_033/individual/character_01.jpg", "Sophie": "images/scenario_033/individual/character_03.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_51 | scenario_065 | medium | Eristic | 3 | Elena; Michael; David | Near the main couch and nearby tables, Elena and Michael face each other as a greeting about a romantic surprise turns into a struggle over whose framing of the situation will stand. David remains close enough to weigh in, and his provocative side remark sharpens the competitive exchange instead of diffusing it. | {"David": "Auxiliary", "Elena": "Quarreller", "Michael": "Quarreller"} | {"David": "Strategic Withholding", "Elena": "Strategic Withholding", "Michael": "Honest Signaling"} | {"David": "Accommodating", "Elena": "Collaborating", "Michael": "Competing"} | {"David": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "actor"}, "Elena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "female", "occupation": "actress"}, "Michael"... | {"David": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral", "Michael": "Neutral"} | {"David": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Michael": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"David": "David must contribute through brief, provocative remarks that imply a weighting of the exchange while withholding any full commitment to a resolving position.", "Elena": "Elena must answer Michael with selective detail and visible restraint so Elena does not fully clarify Elena's position or let David's rema... | {"David": "David must maintain involvement without becoming the principal disputant by yielding the floor after shaping the tone and avoiding direct ownership of the conflict outcome.", "Elena": "Elena must position Elena's replies as joint interpretation management by inviting clarification on terms while refusing to ... | {"David": "David must watch for agreement, interruption, or reframing from Elena and Michael and for cues such as stare shifts, stiff posture, or tension around the mouth, then soften, redirect, or withdraw David's commentary when signs suggest David is being read as the main instigator.", "Elena": "Elena must monitor ... | {"David": "David produces an exchange in which Elena and Michael sharpen their responses around the interpretation conflict after David's brief remark, while the dialogue, turn-taking, and David's withdrawal cues show that David remains relevant without becoming the principal disputant.", "Elena": "Elena secures a dial... | {"David": {"belief": "He believes Elena and Michael are already in a tense interpretive conflict and that his remark can affect how the exchange is socially weighted.", "desire": "He wants to maintain relevance in the interaction without openly taking on responsibility for resolving the dispute.", "intention": "He comm... | images/scenario_065/group_labeled.png | {"David": "images/scenario_065/individual/character_03.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_065/individual/character_01.jpg", "Michael": "images/scenario_065/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_52 | scenario_065 | medium | Eristic | 3 | Elena; Michael; David | Near the main couch and surrounding tables, Elena and Michael hold a public exchange over the meaning of a greeting connected to a romantic surprise, with each trying to establish how the situation should be understood. David remains close enough to influence that interpretation, adding a pointed side remark that sharp... | {"David": "Auxiliary", "Elena": "Quarreller", "Michael": "Quarreller"} | {"David": "Strategic Withholding", "Elena": "Honest Signaling", "Michael": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"David": "Accommodating", "Elena": "Competing", "Michael": "Collaborating"} | {"David": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "actor"}, "Elena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "actress"}, "Michael": {"age":... | {"David": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral", "Michael": "Neutral"} | {"David": "No clear facial affect cues are available for David at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Michael": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Michael at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"David": "David must deliver concise pointed commentary that implies a reading of the exchange without explicitly taking full responsibility for defining the dispute.", "Elena": "Elena must state her interpretation of the greeting and romantic surprise directly and explicitly reject any wording from Michael or David t... | {"David": "David must preserve relevance by inserting shaping remarks from the side while avoiding a fully confrontational bid to control the interaction outright.", "Elena": "Elena must keep pressing the disputed meaning in a self-advantaging frame by challenging Michael's public interpretation rather than yielding th... | {"David": "David must watch for Elena's rebuttals, Michael's hesitation or reframing, and visible shifts in gaze, posture, or facial tension, then modulate the sharpness and timing of David's side remarks to stay influential without becoming dismissible as merely intrusive.", "Elena": "Elena must monitor Michael's hesi... | {"David": "David achieves a visible effect on the public interpretation of the exchange by adding a pointed side remark that Elena and Michael both respond to through dialogue, timing shifts, and observable gaze or posture changes, thereby sharpening the competitive tone without David taking full ownership of the dispu... | {"David": {"belief": "He believes Elena and Michael are already in a tense confrontation over the romantic surprise, and that his contribution can influence how the exchange is socially interpreted.", "desire": "He wants to remain relevant in the interaction by shaping the tone of the exchange without taking full owner... | images/scenario_065/group_labeled.png | {"David": "images/scenario_065/individual/character_03.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_065/individual/character_01.jpg", "Michael": "images/scenario_065/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_53 | scenario_034 | medium | Persuasion | 2 | Elena; Daniel | At the restaurant table, Elena rejects Daniel's claim that her remark caused the problem and challenges his account of what was said. With the missing guest and absent coat taken as signs that the date is over, their exchange centers on whether Elena's words or Daniel's behavior should be held responsible. | {"Daniel": "Respondent", "Elena": "Proponent"} | {"Daniel": "Suppression", "Elena": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Daniel": "Competing", "Elena": "Collaborating"} | {"Daniel": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Business Executive"}, "Elena": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Marketing Manager"}} | {"Daniel": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Daniel": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Daniel at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Daniel": "Daniel must keep Daniel's accusation indirect by avoiding full explicit claims about Daniel's own conduct while repeatedly foregrounding Elena's remark as the most plausible explanation for the failed date.", "Elena": "Elena must selectively state only the parts of the exchange that challenge Daniel's versi... | {"Daniel": "Daniel must pursue acceptance of Daniel's blame account by holding to the accusation, dismissing competing interpretations, and steering each turn back to Elena's remark as the decisive issue.", "Elena": "Elena must position the dispute as a joint problem of uncertain causation by contesting Daniel's framin... | {"Daniel": "Daniel must monitor Elena's agreement, hesitation, contradiction, interruption, facial tightening, gaze withdrawal, and posture shifts, then escalate directness when Elena yields openings and narrow the claim or pause when Elena resists strongly enough to threaten Daniel's standing.", "Elena": "Elena must w... | {"Daniel": "Daniel and Elena end the exchange with Daniel obtaining at least a partial verbal concession from Elena that Elena's remark could reasonably be treated as relevant to the failed date, as shown by Daniel's repeated return to the remark, Elena's narrowed counterstatements, and both participants' observable mo... | {"Daniel": {"belief": "The missing guest has left, and Elena's remark is a plausible reason for why the date failed rather than his own conduct.", "desire": "To secure agreement that Elena's words, not his behavior, explain the failed date.", "intention": "To maintain his accusation and direct the conversation toward E... | images/scenario_034/group_labeled.png | {"Daniel": "images/scenario_034/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_034/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_54 | scenario_034 | medium | Persuasion | 2 | Elena; Daniel | During dinner at the quiet restaurant, Elena rejects Daniel's claim that her remark caused the problem and argues that his account of the insult is inaccurate. As the missing guest and absent coat make the failed date difficult to ignore, their exchange centers on whose version of events will define responsibility for ... | {"Daniel": "Respondent", "Elena": "Proponent"} | {"Daniel": "Suppression", "Elena": "Suppression"} | {"Daniel": "Collaborating", "Elena": "Competing"} | {"Daniel": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Business Executive"}, "Elena": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Marketing Manager"}} | {"Daniel": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Daniel": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Daniel at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Daniel": "Daniel must present Elena's remark as a relevant cause of the failed date while keeping some accusatory implications indirect so Daniel can advance shared recognition without fully exposing every escalation point.", "Elena": "Elena must state that Daniel's account of the remark is inaccurate while keeping k... | {"Daniel": "Daniel must frame the dispute as a joint reconstruction of what led to the failed date while insisting that Elena's words be included so responsibility is not assigned solely to Daniel.", "Elena": "Elena must press a self-protective line that rejects Daniel's version and redirects responsibility toward Dani... | {"Daniel": "Daniel must monitor Elena's disagreement, hesitation, interruption, facial tightening, gaze withdrawal, and posture shifts, then soften timing or reframe toward a shared account when resistance rises and restate causal links more directly when Elena leaves space.", "Elena": "Elena must track Daniel's interr... | {"Daniel": "Daniel and Elena arrive at an explicit disputed account in which Daniel's dialogue keeps Elena's remark on the table as a relevant cause of the failed date, while Elena's denials, counterstatements, and observable tension show that responsibility is not assigned solely to Daniel.", "Elena": "Elena and Danie... | {"Daniel": {"belief": "The guest's departure confirms that the date failed, and Elena's remark is a relevant cause that should be acknowledged.", "desire": "To establish a shared account of why the date failed that does not place the blame solely on him.", "intention": "To press his accusation while arguing that Elena'... | images/scenario_034/group_labeled.png | {"Daniel": "images/scenario_034/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_034/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_55 | scenario_036 | medium | Persuasion | 2 | Sophie; Mark | At the evening work gathering, Sophie and Mark sit close together among colleagues while keeping their conversation private and subdued. Sophie presses for a direct answer to a provocative request, and Mark resists before committing to an awkward, qualified response that tries to preserve their working rapport. | {"Mark": "Respondent", "Sophie": "Proponent"} | {"Mark": "Honest Signaling", "Sophie": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Mark": "Collaborating", "Sophie": "Competing"} | {"Mark": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "office professional"}, "Sophie": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "office professional"... | {"Mark": "Neutral", "Sophie": "Neutral"} | {"Mark": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Mark at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Sophie": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Sophie at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Mark": "Mark must give an honest but qualified reply that openly acknowledges Sophie's pressure while clearly avoiding full agreement with the request.", "Sophie": "Sophie must state the provocative request and explicitly press for a direct yes-or-no style response in a low voice without softening or masking her posi... | {"Mark": "Mark must position the response as a workable middle ground that preserves rapport by recognizing Sophie's need for an answer without fully accepting Sophie's terms.", "Sophie": "Sophie must keep the exchange centered on securing a clear answer by using direct framing that limits Mark's room to sidestep or re... | {"Mark": "Mark must monitor Sophie's insistence, interruptions, reframing, fixed gaze, or forward posture and adjust by answering sooner, adding clarification, or softening the wording to keep the exchange cooperative.", "Sophie": "Sophie must watch for Mark's hesitation, interruptions, qualified wording, gaze shifts, ... | {"Mark": "Mark delivers a qualified, verbally explicit response to Sophie's provocative request that Sophie treats as an answer while the dialogue, Mark's awkward wording, and both participants' restrained private conversational cues show that working rapport is preserved without full agreement.", "Sophie": "Sophie sec... | {"Mark": {"belief": "Sophie expects a direct answer, and his resistance is becoming difficult to maintain within the ongoing private conversation.", "desire": "To respond in a way that preserves working rapport while not fully yielding on Sophie's terms.", "intention": "To offer a qualified, awkward reply that acknowle... | images/scenario_036/group_labeled.png | {"Mark": "images/scenario_036/individual/character_02.jpg", "Sophie": "images/scenario_036/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_56 | scenario_037 | medium | Persuasion | 2 | Ethan; Nathan | In the shared apartment kitchen, Ethan keeps the conversation focused on having Nathan say intimate lines aloud, framing direct rehearsal as necessary if Nathan wants another chance with the woman. Nathan resists by deflecting with jokes and limiting how directly he participates, while Ethan continues to press the exch... | {"Ethan": "Proponent", "Nathan": "Respondent"} | {"Ethan": "Strategic Withholding", "Nathan": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ethan": "Competing", "Nathan": "Collaborating"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "28", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "student"}, "Nathan": {"age": "30", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "student"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Nathan": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "There are no clear facial affect cues available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Nathan": "There are no clear facial affect cues available for Nathan at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must keep asking for the intimate lines as practice while strategically withholding any admission that the pressure could seem intrusive or that alternatives to direct repetition might be acceptable.", "Nathan": "Nathan must honestly signal discomfort with full direct rehearsal by openly limiting parti... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must maintain a competing stance by repeatedly redirecting Nathan's jokes back to explicit verbal rehearsal and prioritizing getting the lines spoken over preserving conversational ease.", "Nathan": "Nathan must take a collaborating stance by staying in the conversation, acknowledging Ethan's point abo... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must monitor Nathan's joking, hesitation, interruptions, gaze shifts, and posture changes, then adjust by narrowing the prompt, pausing briefly, or restating the practical need for direct rehearsal without dropping the demand.", "Nathan": "Nathan must track Ethan's insistence, reframing, interruptions,... | {"Ethan": "Ethan secures a negotiated moment in which Nathan verbally produces at least part of the intimate wording after Ethan repeatedly redirects joking back to rehearsal, and this outcome is evidenced by Ethan's narrowed prompts, Nathan's partial spoken lines and acknowledgments, and both participants' continued e... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Nathan is avoiding direct verbal practice, and without saying the intimate lines in this conversation he will not be prepared to say them to the woman he wants to see again.", "desire": "Nathan to explicitly rehearse the intimate wording during their exchange so the issue is handled directly.", "i... | images/scenario_037/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_037/individual/character_01.jpg", "Nathan": "images/scenario_037/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_57 | scenario_066 | medium | Eristic | 3 | Daniel; Michael; Brian | In the cramped space by the kitchen counter and phone, Daniel, Michael, and Brian turn a suggestive joke into a contest over who gets to define the exchange, with ridicule and interruption taking over the conversation. When the ringing call redirects them to a former job offer, Daniel and Michael press competing versio... | {"Brian": "Quarreller", "Daniel": "Quarreller", "Michael": "Quarreller"} | {"Brian": "Suppression", "Daniel": "Deception", "Michael": "Exaggeration"} | {"Brian": "Collaborating", "Daniel": "Competing", "Michael": "Competing"} | {"Brian": {"age": "34", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "former office worker"}, "Daniel": {"age": "32", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "researcher"}, "Michael": {"age": "30", "charac... | {"Brian": "Neutral", "Daniel": "Neutral", "Michael": "Neutral"} | {"Brian": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Brian at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Daniel": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Daniel at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Michael": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Michael at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Brian": "Brian must keep Brian's own stance partially withheld by speaking indirectly or minimally about disputed points so a stoppable middle position remains available.", "Daniel": "Daniel must present a selectively framed account of the joke and the phone call that redirects the dispute toward details favoring Dan... | {"Brian": "Brian must collaborate by redirecting the argument from ridicule and interruption toward a minimally acceptable settlement that both Daniel and Michael can live with.", "Daniel": "Daniel must press Daniel's preferred version assertively through contradiction, interruption, or dismissive reframing so the exch... | {"Brian": "Brian must monitor interruptions, partial agreement, hesitation, reframing, averted gaze, posture shifts, or mounting tension and then slow the pace, soften wording, or time brief interventions to keep the dispute from becoming completely unworkable.", "Daniel": "Daniel must watch for agreement, hesitation, ... | {"Brian": "Brian brings Daniel and Michael to a minimally accepted stopping point in which after loud refusal one of Daniel or Michael yields verbally or behaviorally enough for the interruptions to drop and the dispute over the former job offer to become temporarily workable.", "Daniel": "Daniel secures a reluctant ve... | {"Brian": {"belief": "He believes the conversation has shifted from joking into a dispute over the former job offer and that continued interruption will prevent any workable resolution.", "desire": "He wants the exchange to move toward a minimally settled understanding that lets the argument stop without further damage... | images/scenario_066/group_labeled.png | {"Brian": "images/scenario_066/individual/character_03.jpg", "Daniel": "images/scenario_066/individual/character_01.jpg", "Michael": "images/scenario_066/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_58 | scenario_038 | medium | Information-seeking | 3 | Ethan; Sophia; Elena | Near the seating area, Ethan samples the first course while Sophia manages the drinks and Elena outlines the prepared dishes and the next course to frame the meal's progression. The exchange stays centered on understanding the food and coordinating the hosting, and Ethan follows the conversation as it moves toward the ... | {"Elena": "Answerer", "Ethan": "Questioner", "Sophia": "Auxiliary"} | {"Elena": "Suppression", "Ethan": "Deception", "Sophia": "Exaggeration"} | {"Elena": "Competing", "Ethan": "Compromising", "Sophia": "Accommodating"} | {"Elena": {"age": "27", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Culinary Artist"}, "Ethan": {"age": "30", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Food Critic"}, "Sophia": {"age": "28", "characteris... | {"Elena": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral", "Sophia": "Neutral"} | {"Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Sophia": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Elena": "Elena should use suppression by keeping evaluative uncertainties or alternative interpretations unstated while presenting the prepared dishes and next course as the primary frame for understanding the meal.", "Ethan": "Ethan should use deceptively agreeable comments and selective questions to appear fully al... | {"Elena": "Elena should take a competing stance by asserting Elena's explanation of preparation and sequence as the dominant interpretation and limiting drift away from Elena's intended framing.", "Ethan": "Ethan should take a compromising stance by offering brief validating remarks that preserve hosting flow while ste... | {"Elena": "Elena should monitor Ethan's follow-up questions, Sophia's reinforcement, interruptions, gaze direction, and posture changes, then tighten or broaden Elena's explanation and pacing to retain authority over how the meal is interpreted.", "Ethan": "Ethan should watch for Elena's reframing, Sophia's pauses, int... | {"Elena": "Elena, through a controlled explanation of preparation and sequence, establishes a shared conversational frame in which Ethan's follow-up remarks align with Elena's account of the dishes and Sophia's coordinating support keeps the interaction centered on Elena's intended progression of the meal.", "Ethan": "... | {"Elena": {"belief": "She believes the current interaction is focused on her dishes and that the guest is tracking what has been prepared and what will come next.", "desire": "She wants the guest to understand the meal on her terms and recognize the coherence of the course sequence.", "intention": "She forms the intent... | images/scenario_038/group_labeled.png | {"Elena": "images/scenario_038/individual/character_03.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_038/individual/character_01.jpg", "Sophia": "images/scenario_038/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_59 | scenario_039 | medium | Information-seeking | 2 | Lily; Mia | In the busy neighborhood café, Lily asks Mia what she wants for her birthday and treats Mia's personal reply as insufficiently specific for choosing a present. As they continue talking over coffee, the conversation narrows to a simple bath-and-body shop suggestion that gives Lily a practical answer and keeps the exchan... | {"Lily": "Questioner", "Mia": "Answerer"} | {"Lily": "Honest Signaling", "Mia": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Lily": "Competing", "Mia": "Collaborating"} | {"Lily": {"age": "28", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "waitress"}, "Mia": {"age": "26", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "female", "occupation": "musician"}} | {"Lily": "Neutral", "Mia": "Neutral"} | {"Lily": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lily at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Mia": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Mia at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Lily": "Lily must state directly that Mia's first answer is not specific enough and openly propose a concrete gift category to make Lily's practical aim visible.", "Mia": "Mia must avoid fully elaborating the personal meaning of Mia's initial answer while offering just enough detail to guide Lily toward a simple bath... | {"Lily": "Lily must keep directing the talk toward one usable present option by prioritizing a clear selection over extended exploration of Mia's broader personal answer.", "Mia": "Mia must frame responses to help Lily and Mia converge on an acceptable present by adding workable cues without insisting on Mia's full ori... | {"Lily": "Lily must watch for Mia's agreement, hesitation, reframing, gaze shifts, or posture tightening and respond by either pressing for specificity or easing the framing into a simpler concrete suggestion.", "Mia": "Mia must track Lily's interruptions, narrowing questions, acceptance cues, and visible focus changes... | {"Lily": "Lily and Mia reach a mutually recognized point in the café conversation where Lily names a bath-and-body shop type gift as a usable present and Mia confirms it through matching dialogue, receptive behavioral cues, and no further push toward a different answer.", "Mia": "Mia and Lily bring the birthday exchang... | {"Lily": {"belief": "Mia's initial birthday answer does not give enough concrete guidance for choosing a gift, and a more specific option is needed for the conversation to settle on something usable.", "desire": "To reach a clear, practical understanding of what gift Mia would accept as an appropriate birthday present.... | images/scenario_039/group_labeled.png | {"Lily": "images/scenario_039/individual/character_01.jpg", "Mia": "images/scenario_039/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_60 | scenario_040 | medium | Eristic | 4 | Ethan; Lila; Elena; Ryan | Around the kitchen table in the familiar apartment, Ethan continues presenting his plan to buy clothing for another woman as acceptable, while Lila disputes that framing in front of the others and turns the discussion into an open challenge. Elena stays attentive without taking over the exchange, and Ryan, after the ar... | {"Elena": "Auxiliary", "Ethan": "Quarreller", "Lila": "Quarreller", "Ryan": "Auxiliary"} | {"Elena": "Exaggeration", "Ethan": "Exaggeration", "Lila": "Deception", "Ryan": "Suppression"} | {"Elena": "Accommodating", "Ethan": "Collaborating", "Lila": "Competing", "Ryan": "Accommodating"} | {"Elena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Model"}, "Ethan": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Actor"}, "Lila": {"age": "early 30s", ... | {"Elena": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral", "Ryan": "Neutral"} | {"Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ryan": "No clear facial af... | {"Elena": "Elena must overstate attentiveness and neutrality through measured acknowledgments, restrained comments, and visible listening cues so Elena does not appear aligned with either side.", "Ethan": "Ethan must amplify the practicality and normality of the clothing purchase in Ethan's wording and presentation so ... | {"Elena": "Elena must prioritize preserving group harmony by supporting a workable exchange with minimal self-assertion and without taking ownership of the dispute.", "Ethan": "Ethan must keep framing the exchange as a shared evaluation of context and intentions by inviting the table to consider Ethan's explanation rat... | {"Elena": "Elena must monitor agreement, hesitation, overlap, gaze shifts, and posture tightening, and then adjust Elena's brief responses, eye contact, and speaking timing to signal engagement without escalating alignment.", "Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Lila's interruptions, others' hesitation, crossed arms, narrowe... | {"Elena": "Elena's restrained acknowledgments, visible listening, and careful timing must contribute to an interaction in which Ethan and Lila continue the dispute while Ryan restores a workable group conversation and the others' responses do not place Elena clearly on either side.", "Ethan": "Ethan's continued explana... | {"Elena": {"belief": "She believes the discussion has become a visible dispute between Ethan and Lila that everyone nearby can follow.", "desire": "She wants the conversation to return to a workable shared exchange without forcing her into the center of the conflict.", "intention": "She commits to remaining an attentiv... | images/scenario_040/group_labeled.png | {"Elena": "images/scenario_040/individual/character_03.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_040/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_040/individual/character_02.jpg", "Ryan": "images/scenario_040/individual/character_04.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_61 | scenario_040 | medium | Eristic | 4 | Ethan; Lila; Elena; Ryan | At the kitchen table in the familiar apartment, Ethan continues presenting his account of buying clothing for another woman and the upcoming date, while Lila openly presses him to clarify it in front of the others. Elena and Ryan stay close enough to register the dispute's effect on the group, and when the exchange sta... | {"Elena": "Auxiliary", "Ethan": "Quarreller", "Lila": "Quarreller", "Ryan": "Auxiliary"} | {"Elena": "Suppression", "Ethan": "Deception", "Lila": "Suppression", "Ryan": "Suppression"} | {"Elena": "Accommodating", "Ethan": "Competing", "Lila": "Collaborating", "Ryan": "Accommodating"} | {"Elena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Model"}, "Ethan": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Actor"}, "Lila": {"age": "early 30s", "charact... | {"Elena": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral", "Ryan": "Neutral"} | {"Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ryan": "No clear facial af... | {"Elena": "Elena withholds Elena's full judgment and shows attentiveness through brief acknowledgments, restrained facial reactions, and limited comments that do not intensify the dispute.", "Ethan": "Ethan presents a coherent account of the clothing purchase and upcoming date while selectively shaping details so Ethan... | {"Elena": "Elena prioritizes preserving a workable atmosphere by staying non-confrontational, avoiding side-taking, and making space for the exchange to settle.", "Ethan": "Ethan keeps control of the exchange by asserting Ethan's explanation as sufficient, resisting Lila's framing, and prioritizing Ethan's standing wit... | {"Elena": "Elena tracks interruption patterns, silences, gaze aversion, and posture tightening from Ethan, Lila, and Ryan, then adjusts Elena's visibility through minimal responses or quiet stillness to avoid escalating group polarization.", "Ethan": "Ethan monitors Lila's interruptions, Ryan's attempts to redirect, an... | {"Elena": "Elena helps preserve a workable shared atmosphere when Elena's restrained acknowledgments and non-escalating presence, alongside Ryan's intervention and the visible slowing of Ethan and Lila's exchange, support the group in shifting out of the dispute without Elena taking a side.", "Ethan": "Ethan secures a ... | {"Elena": {"belief": "She believes the exchange has become a pointed dispute that everyone nearby can hear and that her presence makes her an observer of its social meaning.", "desire": "She wants the group to move away from unresolved public conflict and maintain a workable shared atmosphere.", "intention": "She commi... | images/scenario_040/group_labeled.png | {"Elena": "images/scenario_040/individual/character_03.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_040/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_040/individual/character_02.jpg", "Ryan": "images/scenario_040/individual/character_04.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_62 | scenario_042 | medium | Deliberation | 2 | Ethan; Clara | At the kitchen table, Ethan and Clara let the joking interruption fall away as their dinner talk becomes a direct evaluation of what makes a relationship worth pursuing. They openly test whether comfort and chemistry should be treated as competing priorities or as qualities that must be balanced, pushing the conversati... | {"Clara": "Deliberator", "Ethan": "Deliberator"} | {"Clara": "Honest Signaling", "Ethan": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Clara": "Competing", "Ethan": "Compromising"} | {"Clara": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "creative professional"}, "Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "office worker"}} | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must state directly which relationship standard deserves priority and make the tradeoff between comfort and chemistry explicit in her own wording.", "Ethan": "Ethan must state plainly that a worthwhile relationship should include both comfort and chemistry, using concrete wording that makes the middle-... | {"Clara": "Clara must strategically press for a decisive conclusion by challenging middle-ground claims and asserting a clear priority standard with minimal concession.", "Ethan": "Ethan must strategically position the discussion toward mutual concession by acknowledging the value of each criterion while arguing that n... | {"Clara": "Clara must track Ethan’s agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframing, facial tightening, gaze aversion, and posture shifts, then intensify the comparison, narrow the question, or pause for a direct answer depending on those signals.", "Ethan": "Ethan must monitor Clara’s agreement, hesitation, interruptio... | {"Clara": "Clara and Ethan reach a defensible concluding standard in which the tradeoff between comfort and chemistry is explicitly resolved in dialogue, with Clara’s direct challenges forcing Ethan to define his middle-ground claim clearly enough for both speakers to treat the balance as the accepted outcome.", "Ethan... | {"Clara": {"belief": "The dinner conversation is now a direct test of competing relationship standards, including whether choosing comfort over chemistry is an acceptable compromise.", "desire": "To clarify which standard should take priority so the discussion reaches a defensible conclusion about what kind of relation... | images/scenario_042/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_042/individual/character_02.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_042/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_63 | scenario_044 | medium | Information-seeking | 2 | Clara; Lila | At the busy gathering, Lila draws Clara into a more private exchange to settle a question central to her wedding plans. She asks Clara directly whether she will formally take the maid of honour role, making Clara's clear answer socially significant for both of them. | {"Clara": "Answerer", "Lila": "Questioner"} | {"Clara": "Honest Signaling", "Lila": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Clara": "Accommodating", "Lila": "Competing"} | {"Clara": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "student"}, "Lila": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "female", "occupation": "student"}} | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must state plainly whether Clara accepts the maid of honour role and match that answer with consistent wording, steady gaze, and no omission about the commitment Clara can make.", "Lila": "Lila must ask for a definite answer while withholding any broader uncertainty about backup plans or social implica... | {"Clara": "Clara must prioritize preserving the relationship by giving a truthful answer in a softened, considerate form that still resolves the role question clearly.", "Lila": "Lila must steer the exchange toward Lila's need for a firm position by pressing for closure and minimizing side discussion that could leave t... | {"Clara": "Clara must watch for Lila's interruptions, hesitation, reframing, tightened posture, or fixed gaze and then adjust pacing and wording to make Clara's answer clearer without becoming indirect.", "Lila": "Lila must monitor Clara's pauses, softened phrasing, gaze shifts, posture changes, or attempts to reframe ... | {"Clara": "Clara and Lila reach a mutually recognized, explicitly stated answer about whether Clara will take the maid of honour role, shown by Clara's direct wording, Lila's confirming response, and both women orienting the conversation toward the settled role question.", "Lila": "Lila and Clara arrive at a publicly i... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Lila is asking her directly for a personal commitment within the wedding plans, and Clara's response will define her role in relation to Lila during the event planning.", "desire": "To establish a clear and truthful understanding with Lila about whether she will accept the maid of honour role.", "... | images/scenario_044/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_044/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_044/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_64 | scenario_045 | medium | Eristic | 3 | Emma; Lucas; Clara | Inside the dental office during work hours, Emma and Clara confront Lucas together near the chair and equipment, making clear that they are ending their relationships with him and rejecting his explanations about overlapping involvement. The argument centers on whose account will define what happened in that room, with... | {"Clara": "Quarreller", "Emma": "Quarreller", "Lucas": "Quarreller"} | {"Clara": "Deception", "Emma": "Deception", "Lucas": "Suppression"} | {"Clara": "Competing", "Emma": "Collaborating", "Lucas": "Collaborating"} | {"Clara": {"age": "mid-20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "dental assistant"}, "Emma": {"age": "mid-20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "dental assistant"}, "Lucas": {"age": "mi... | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Emma": "Neutral", "Lucas": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Emma": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Emma at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lucas": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lucas at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara should state a decisive version of Lucas's overlapping involvement while strategically shaping or omitting details so that Emma and Clara's account appears fully settled and Lucas's explanations appear indefensible.", "Emma": "Emma should present Lucas's explanations as if Emma has no remaining uncerta... | {"Clara": "Clara should press the confrontation competitively by challenging Lucas's credibility directly, refusing concessions, and driving the exchange toward a public rejection that keeps Emma aligned with Clara's version.", "Emma": "Emma should strategically align Emma's statements with Clara's points to collaborat... | {"Clara": "Clara should track Lucas's hesitation, interruptions, reframing attempts, facial tension, gaze avoidance, and posture shifts, then cut in faster, sharpen accusations when Lucas looks for openings, and briefly synchronize with Emma when Emma signals agreement or reinforcement.", "Emma": "Emma should watch for... | {"Clara": "Clara and Emma drive the confrontation to an observable outcome in which Lucas is publicly rejected and Clara and Emma's shared version overrides Lucas's explanation in the room through coordinated dialogue, reinforcement, and Lucas's inability to regain the floor.", "Emma": "Emma and Clara establish in dial... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Clara believes that Lucas has been involved with both her and Emma and that confronting him together in the dental office gives her leverage against his excuses.", "desire": "Clara wants a decisive public rejection of Lucas and wants his explanations to be overridden by her and Emma's shared accou... | images/scenario_045/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_045/individual/character_03.jpg", "Emma": "images/scenario_045/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lucas": "images/scenario_045/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_65 | scenario_045 | medium | Eristic | 3 | Emma; Lucas; Clara | Inside the dental office during work hours, Emma and Clara confront Lucas together near the chair and equipment, making the breakup explicit while challenging the credibility of his explanations about overlapping relationships and prior encounters in the room. The argument becomes a struggle over whose account will sta... | {"Clara": "Quarreller", "Emma": "Quarreller", "Lucas": "Quarreller"} | {"Clara": "Honest Signaling", "Emma": "Exaggeration", "Lucas": "Exaggeration"} | {"Clara": "Collaborating", "Emma": "Competing", "Lucas": "Competing"} | {"Clara": {"age": "mid-20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "dental assistant"}, "Emma": {"age": "mid-20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "dental assistant"}, "Lucas": {... | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Emma": "Neutral", "Lucas": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Emma": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Emma at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lucas": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lucas at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must state Clara's observations and conclusions plainly and consistently, using direct questions and explicit acknowledgments that test Lucas's account without distortion or omission.", "Emma": "Emma must amplify the inconsistency in Lucas's explanations by repeating and sharpening specific contradicti... | {"Clara": "Clara must coordinate with Emma by treating the confrontation as a joint fact-checking effort, integrating both accounts, and pushing for a clear shared conclusion that the relationships are over.", "Emma": "Emma must keep control of the confrontation by pressing Lucas for acknowledgment on Emma's terms, rej... | {"Clara": "Clara must track whether Lucas answers directly, hesitates, interrupts, or shifts gaze and whether Emma escalates, then adjust by clarifying the question, sequencing turns, or restating common ground to keep the exchange focused and aligned.", "Emma": "Emma must watch for Lucas's hesitation, interruption, re... | {"Clara": "Clara brings about an exchange in which Clara and Emma align on a plainly stated conclusion that the relationships are over because Lucas's explanations do not hold together, and Lucas's replies, pauses, or gaze shifts fail to break that shared conclusion.", "Emma": "Emma secures an exchange in which Emma an... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Lucas has been involved with both her and Emma and is responding with excuses that need to be directly tested in front of all three of them.", "desire": "To establish a shared, explicit acknowledgment that the relationships are over because Lucas's account cannot be trusted.", "intention": "To coo... | images/scenario_045/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_045/individual/character_03.jpg", "Emma": "images/scenario_045/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lucas": "images/scenario_045/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_66 | scenario_067 | medium | Eristic | 2 | Elena; Clara | In the cluttered common area near the kitchen, Clara holds a printed sheet and keeps citing examples about the other woman's choices as support for her interpretation. Elena repeatedly cuts in with dismissive counters, and the exchange narrows into a struggle over whose account of envy, money, and a supposedly better l... | {"Clara": "Quarreller", "Elena": "Quarreller"} | {"Clara": "Suppression", "Elena": "Deception"} | {"Clara": "Competing", "Elena": "Collaborating"} | {"Clara": {"age": "30", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "restaurant manager"}, "Elena": {"age": "28", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "graphic designer"}} | {"Clara": "Anger", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "Clara's face is tense and her brows are furrowed as she reviews the activities of the person who stole her credit card.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must keep citing examples from the printed sheet while suppressing any uncertainty or gaps that would make Elena's dismissal easier.", "Elena": "Elena must present Clara's examples as weak or misread while using deceptive phrasing that implies certainty and stronger evidence than Elena actually states.... | {"Clara": "Clara must maintain a competing stance by pressing Clara's interpretation as the stronger account and resisting Elena's attempts to redirect the meaning of envy, money, and a better life.", "Elena": "Elena must pursue a collaborating stance by reframing the dispute as a question of better interpretation whil... | {"Clara": "Clara must monitor Elena's dismissive counters, overlap, posture shifts, gaze breaks, and facial tightening, then respond by tightening example order, increasing directness, or pausing briefly before restating the core claim when Elena pushes back.", "Elena": "Elena must track Clara's insistence, pauses, pap... | {"Clara": "Clara and Elena reach an observable exchange state in which Clara's printed examples remain the reference point of the argument, and Elena's dismissive counters, interruptions, or reformulations show that Clara's interpretation has become specific enough that Elena must keep contesting it directly rather tha... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Elena's interruptions are challenging the legitimacy of her examples and turning the discussion into a direct dispute over envy, money, and what counts as a better life.", "desire": "To have her interpretation of the other woman's choices recognized as valid and harder for Elena to dismiss.", "int... | images/scenario_067/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_067/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_067/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_67 | scenario_067 | medium | Eristic | 2 | Elena; Clara | In the apartment's common area near the kitchen, Clara holds a printed sheet while laying out examples about the other woman's choices and what they supposedly show about money and a better life. Elena repeatedly cuts in to reject that framing, and the exchange narrows into a direct contest over whose interpretation of... | {"Clara": "Quarreller", "Elena": "Quarreller"} | {"Clara": "Honest Signaling", "Elena": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Clara": "Collaborating", "Elena": "Competing"} | {"Clara": {"age": "30", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "restaurant manager"}, "Elena": {"age": "28", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "graphic designer"}} | {"Clara": "Anger", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "Clara's facial expression shows signs of distress and frustration as she reviews the activities and purchases made by the person who stole her credit card.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must state openly how the printed examples support Clara's comparison about choices, money, and a better life without masking Clara's evaluative stance.", "Elena": "Elena must state plainly that Clara's comparison is unrealistic or unfair and explicitly reject any wording that implies the other woman's... | {"Clara": "Clara must pursue a collaborating line by linking each example to Clara's point and inviting Elena to address the evidence rather than only rejecting the framing.", "Elena": "Elena must press a competing line by directly contesting Clara's examples and asserting Elena's interpretation as the more credible ac... | {"Clara": "Clara must monitor Elena's cut-ins, disagreement markers, facial tension, gaze shifts, and posture changes, then adjust by pausing for Elena's objection, narrowing the claim when Elena reframes, or adding concrete examples when Elena dismisses the point.", "Elena": "Elena must track Clara's interruptions, in... | {"Clara": "Clara and Elena reach an observable point where Elena explicitly responds to at least one printed example on Clara's terms and the dialogue shows Clara's comparison being treated as a legitimate claim under dispute rather than dismissed outright.", "Elena": "Elena and Clara reach an observable point where Cl... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Elena is dismissing her examples instead of engaging with the point she is trying to make about the other woman's choices, money, and the idea of a better life.", "desire": "To have her account treated as legitimate and to get Elena to acknowledge the validity of her comparison.", "intention": "To... | images/scenario_067/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_067/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_067/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_68 | scenario_046 | medium | Eristic | 2 | Ava; Lila | Late at night at the apartment kitchen table, Ava and Lila turn an ordinary domestic exchange into a pointed contest over whose life affords more enviable options and whose burdens count more. Ava presses the comparison by enlarging a list of desirable experiences to show what is unavailable to her, while Lila responds... | {"Ava": "Quarreller", "Lila": "Quarreller"} | {"Ava": "Exaggeration", "Lila": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Ava": "Collaborating", "Lila": "Competing"} | {"Ava": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "student"}, "Lila": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "female", "occupation": "restaurant manager"}} | {"Ava": "Neutral", "Lila": "Anger"} | {"Ava": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ava at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "Lila's facial expression shows frustration and inadequacy at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ava": "Ava must amplify the number or significance of desirable experiences named in dialogue or thought so Ava's limits appear unmistakably unequal rather than merely inconvenient.", "Lila": "Lila must use strategic withholding by declining to concede the value or relevance of Ava's examples and revealing only count... | {"Ava": "Ava must pursue a collaborating stance by framing the comparison as a shared clarification of unequal burdens while still pressing for acknowledgment that Ava's options are more restricted.", "Lila": "Lila must take a competing stance by steering the exchange toward flaws, limits, or overstatement in Ava's cla... | {"Ava": "Ava must watch for Lila's interruptions, dismissive reframing, narrowed gaze, posture tightening, or delayed replies and then adjust by slowing the pace, adding concrete examples, or explicitly linking each example back to unequal burdens.", "Lila": "Lila must monitor Ava's insistence, escalation, pauses, lean... | {"Ava": "Ava brings the exchange to a point where Ava's expanded examples of unavailable experiences and explicit links to unequal burdens are answered by Lila's selective challenges, making the dialogue show that the dispute centers on whether Ava's restrictions deserve acknowledgment rather than on any single example... | {"Ava": {"belief": "Lila is treating the conversation as a comparison of whose circumstances are more favorable and is minimizing Ava's burdens by challenging the value of the experiences being named.", "desire": "To establish that her own obligations and limits are being overlooked and that the comparison should ackno... | images/scenario_046/group_labeled.png | {"Ava": "images/scenario_046/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_046/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_69 | scenario_046 | medium | Eristic | 2 | Ava; Lila | Late at night at the kitchen table, Ava and Lila turn an ordinary domestic exchange into a pointed argument over whose life should count as more enviable or more burdened. As one names desirable experiences and the other challenges what those examples are supposed to prove, the conversation becomes a struggle to contro... | {"Ava": "Quarreller", "Lila": "Quarreller"} | {"Ava": "Strategic Withholding", "Lila": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ava": "Competing", "Lila": "Collaborating"} | {"Ava": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "female", "occupation": "student"}, "Lila": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "restaurant manager"}} | {"Ava": "Neutral", "Lila": "Sadness"} | {"Ava": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ava at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "Lila's facial expression shows visible frustration and self-doubt at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ava": "Ava must present only examples of constraints and sacrifices that support Ava's claim while omitting details that could validate Lila's account of opportunity or burden.", "Lila": "Lila must state directly that visible opportunities do not cancel concrete family obligations and tradeoffs, using clear examples ... | {"Ava": "Ava must push the exchange toward a ranking of whose burdens count more by contesting Lila's examples and resisting any concession that would weaken Ava's standing.", "Lila": "Lila must keep pressing for a fairness frame that includes both opportunity and obligation by tying Lila's claims to concrete burdens r... | {"Ava": "Ava must watch for Lila's agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframing, tightened posture, gaze shifts, or facial tension and then sharpen, delay, or narrow Ava's next point to keep control of the comparison.", "Lila": "Lila must track Ava's agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframing, narrowed gaze, post... | {"Ava": "Ava and Lila end up explicitly arguing over a ranked comparison in which Lila is pushed to answer Ava's selective examples of sacrifice and burden on Ava's terms rather than settling on a shared standard of fairness.", "Lila": "Lila and Ava end up with Ava directly acknowledging in dialogue that Lila's visible... | {"Ava": {"belief": "Lila is framing the conversation as a comparison of who has had more desirable options and fewer burdens, and any concession will weaken Ava's standing in the exchange.", "desire": "To establish that her own constraints and sacrifices outweigh Lila's claims of enviable opportunities.", "intention": ... | images/scenario_046/group_labeled.png | {"Ava": "images/scenario_046/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_046/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_70 | scenario_068 | medium | Deliberation | 2 | Ethan; Ryan | At a table in the middle of the busy café, Ethan and Ryan use the conversation to compare possible stage names in terms of how each one would read in professional acting contexts. As their drinks arrive, Ethan offers direct evaluations while Ryan narrows the options according to which name seems most suitable for casti... | {"Ethan": "Deliberator", "Ryan": "Deliberator"} | {"Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Ryan": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ethan": "Collaborating", "Ryan": "Competing"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "writer"}, "Ryan": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "actor"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Ryan": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ryan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must state clear and truthful comparisons of the stage-name options using explicit professional criteria without omitting reservations that affect credibility.", "Ryan": "Ryan must openly state which shortlisted names seem strongest or weakest for casting and representation so the narrowing process ref... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must frame the discussion as a joint evaluation by inviting Ryan to weigh each name against industry expectations while contributing direct assessments.", "Ryan": "Ryan must steer the discussion toward the single most professionally advantageous option by prioritizing Ryan’s preferred criteria over pre... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Ryan’s agreement, hesitation, interruptions, narrowed gaze, posture shifts, or tension cues and then adjust pacing, specificity, or comparative framing to keep the evaluation clear and usable.", "Ryan": "Ryan must track Ethan’s agreement, hesitation, reframing, direct criticism, eye focu... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Ryan reach a shared shortlist with one stage name treated in the dialogue and their observable response cues as the most professionally credible option because Ethan’s direct comparisons and adjustments to Ryan’s signals make the evaluation clear and defensible.", "Ryan": "Ryan and Ethan converge o... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Ryan is deciding among possible stage names, and the current conversation is meant to compare which option will appear most professionally suitable to casting and representation.", "desire": "To help establish a clear, credible evaluation of the name options so Ryan can make a professionally appro... | images/scenario_068/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_068/individual/character_01.jpg", "Ryan": "images/scenario_068/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_71 | scenario_068 | medium | Deliberation | 2 | Ethan; Ryan | At a table in the middle of the café, Ethan and Ryan use the conversation to compare stage-name options in terms of how each would be judged professionally. As coffee arrives, they work toward narrowing the list by evaluating which name sounds most suitable for casting and representation and which choice they can reaso... | {"Ethan": "Deliberator", "Ryan": "Deliberator"} | {"Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Ryan": "Suppression"} | {"Ethan": "Accommodating", "Ryan": "Competing"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "writer"}, "Ryan": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "actor"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Ryan": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ryan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ryan at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan states clear comparative judgments about each stage-name option in professional terms and openly notes any uncertainty so Ethan's input remains candid and usable.", "Ryan": "Ryan keeps Ryan's full commitment to any one stage-name option partially unspoken and presents the options selectively through co... | {"Ethan": "Ethan supports a shared narrowing process by keeping comments centered on casting and representation suitability while allowing Ryan's final preference to guide the pace of selection.", "Ryan": "Ryan pushes the discussion toward a defensible winner by steering comparisons to industry credibility and pressing... | {"Ethan": "Ethan watches for Ryan's agreement, hesitation, interruption, gaze shifts, and posture changes, and Ethan adjusts by softening wording, giving concrete comparisons, or briefly pausing before restating the professional criteria.", "Ryan": "Ryan monitors Ethan's agreement, hesitation, reframing, facial tighten... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Ryan verbally narrow the stage-name list to one leading option that both describe as the strongest fit for casting and representation, with Ethan's candid comparisons and observable adjustments to Ryan's cues helping produce Ryan's explicit acceptance of the result.", "Ryan": "Ryan and Ethan end th... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Ryan is using this conversation to compare stage-name options and needs a candid evaluation of which name fits professional expectations.", "desire": "Reach a shared assessment of the strongest name option for Ryan's professional use.", "intention": "Offer direct comparative judgments about the na... | images/scenario_068/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_068/individual/character_01.jpg", "Ryan": "images/scenario_068/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_72 | scenario_047 | medium | Information-seeking | 2 | Ethan; Liam | In a corner of the busy coffeehouse seating area, Liam asks Ethan to help evaluate and refine a name, noting each version as Ethan gives direct judgments. Their playful exchange centers on reaching a memorable full name by testing how each version sounds when paired with famous musical titles. | {"Ethan": "Answerer", "Liam": "Questioner"} | {"Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Liam": "Exaggeration"} | {"Ethan": "Competing", "Liam": "Collaborating"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "writer"}, "Liam": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "actor"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Liam": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Liam": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must state clear, literal judgments on each name variation and musical-title pairing without softening, omitting, or overstating his assessment so Ethan's usefulness remains evident in the exchange.", "Liam": "Liam must present each name variation with amplified musical-title comparisons that heighten ... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must steer the evaluation toward naming one strongest full-name option through firm comparative judgments that prioritize Ethan's standard for what sounds most memorable.", "Liam": "Liam must frame the exchange as a joint refinement process by inviting Ethan's judgments, integrating useful feedback, an... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must watch Liam for agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframing, gaze shifts, or posture tightening and then sharpen, shorten, or restate Ethan's evaluation to keep the discussion converging on one memorable option.", "Liam": "Liam must track Ethan's agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframing, g... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Liam reach an observable point where Liam repeats one full-name version as the strongest option after Ethan's direct comparative judgments narrow the alternatives and both men's dialogue, note-taking, and visible orientation stay fixed on that single choice when paired with famous musical titles.",... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Liam is relying on his responses to judge which name variation works best, and the current discussion is focused on whether the full name sounds memorable alongside well-known musical titles.", "desire": "To establish a name version that is clearly effective and recognized as the strongest option ... | images/scenario_047/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_047/individual/character_01.jpg", "Liam": "images/scenario_047/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_73 | scenario_048 | medium | Deliberation | 3 | Liam; Derek; Michael | In the shared lounge area, Liam, Derek, and Michael focus on what the veterinarian's advice allows and compare which zoo placements are realistically possible for the monkey. As they narrow the discussion to specific zoos and feasibility, Liam and Derek work toward a workable shared option while Michael keeps his commi... | {"Derek": "Deliberator", "Liam": "Deliberator", "Michael": "Deliberator"} | {"Derek": "Deception", "Liam": "Deception", "Michael": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Derek": "Accommodating", "Liam": "Accommodating", "Michael": "Competing"} | {"Derek": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "writer"}, "Liam": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "actor"}, "Michael": {"age": "late 20s", "charact... | {"Derek": "Neutral", "Liam": "Neutral", "Michael": "Neutral"} | {"Derek": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Derek at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Liam": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Liam at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Michael": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Michael at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Derek": "Derek should describe the most viable zoo alternative with selectively misleading confidence about likely acceptance so the discussion stays focused on feasibility without openly disputing others.", "Liam": "Liam should present selected zoo options as clearly practical while using misleading certainty or sel... | {"Derek": "Derek should accommodate Liam and Michael by supporting overlap in their statements and nudging the conversation toward one feasible placement option while avoiding explicit disagreement.", "Liam": "Liam should accommodate Derek and Michael by aligning outwardly with both positions and gently guiding the dis... | {"Derek": "Derek should monitor agreement, reframing, interruptions, facial tightening, gaze shifts, or closed posture from Liam and Michael, then adjust by validating prior points, lowering claim strength, or redirecting to feasibility criteria.", "Liam": "Liam should watch for agreement, hesitation, interruption, nar... | {"Derek": "Derek secures Liam's expressed support for treating one zoo placement as the leading feasible option under the veterinarian's constraints, while Michael verbally leaves commitment limited pending clarity, as evidenced by overlapping feasibility language, validation from Liam, and Michael's restrained but non... | {"Derek": {"belief": "The current decision depends on identifying a zoo that would actually accept the monkey under the veterinarian's constraints.", "desire": "To support a shared view of the most viable placement option among the zoos being discussed.", "intention": "To frame the conversation around feasible alternat... | images/scenario_048/group_labeled.png | {"Derek": "images/scenario_048/individual/character_02.jpg", "Liam": "images/scenario_048/individual/character_01.jpg", "Michael": "images/scenario_048/individual/character_03.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_74 | scenario_049 | medium | Persuasion | 2 | Jade Reynolds; Elena Hart | At the table in the shared apartment, Jade argues that the Cats open call is worth considering, using humor and a personal example to frame missed chances as more consequential than possible embarrassment. Across from her, Elena resists that framing by emphasizing that her discomfort with performing should count as a s... | {"Elena Hart": "Respondent", "Jade Reynolds": "Proponent"} | {"Elena Hart": "Exaggeration", "Jade Reynolds": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Elena Hart": "Competing", "Jade Reynolds": "Compromising"} | {"Elena Hart": {"age": "27", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "chef"}, "Jade Reynolds": {"age": "28", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "actress"}} | {"Elena Hart": "Neutral", "Jade Reynolds": "Neutral"} | {"Elena Hart": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena Hart at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Jade Reynolds": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Jade Reynolds at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Elena Hart": "Elena Hart must amplify how unsuitable performing feels for Elena Hart so Elena Hart's reluctance is treated as sufficient reason not to call the audition a good idea.", "Jade Reynolds": "Jade Reynolds must state plainly that the audition is worth considering as a low-stakes chance and use humor or a pe... | {"Elena Hart": "Elena Hart must hold a firm counter-position that centers Elena Hart's nonperformer standpoint and directly resist Jade Reynolds's opportunity-focused framing so Elena Hart's boundary is not treated as negotiable.", "Jade Reynolds": "Jade Reynolds must pursue a middle-ground frame by presenting the audi... | {"Elena Hart": "Elena Hart must monitor Jade Reynolds's agreement, joking persistence, interruptions, reframing, leaning in, steady gaze, or tension cues and answer by increasing directness, repeating Elena Hart's basis, or cutting off side examples when Jade Reynolds presses harder.", "Jade Reynolds": "Jade Reynolds m... | {"Elena Hart": "Elena Hart and Jade Reynolds reach a dialogue state in which Jade Reynolds explicitly accepts that Elena Hart's reluctance to perform is a sufficient basis for not calling the Cats open call a good idea for Elena Hart, with Elena Hart's amplified counter-position, repeated basis, and firmer cutoffs visi... | {"Elena Hart": {"belief": "Elena believes Jade is actively trying to persuade her to consider the audition despite her stated discomfort with performing.", "desire": "Elena wants her reluctance to perform to be accepted as a valid basis for not treating the audition as a good idea for her.", "intention": "Elena intends... | images/scenario_049/group_labeled.png | {"Elena Hart": "images/scenario_049/individual/character_02.jpg", "Jade Reynolds": "images/scenario_049/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_75 | scenario_049 | medium | Persuasion | 2 | Jade Reynolds; Elena Hart | At the table in the shared apartment, Jade argues that the Cats open call is worth considering, using jokes and a personal example to present missed chances as worse than possible embarrassment. Elena responds that her discomfort with performing is a valid reason not to treat the audition lightly, turning the exchange ... | {"Elena Hart": "Respondent", "Jade Reynolds": "Proponent"} | {"Elena Hart": "Honest Signaling", "Jade Reynolds": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Elena Hart": "Collaborating", "Jade Reynolds": "Competing"} | {"Elena Hart": {"age": "27", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "chef"}, "Jade Reynolds": {"age": "28", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "actress"}} | {"Elena Hart": "Neutral", "Jade Reynolds": "Neutral"} | {"Elena Hart": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena Hart at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Jade Reynolds": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Jade Reynolds at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Elena Hart": "Elena Hart must state openly that discomfort with performing is a sufficient reason for Elena Hart not to treat the audition lightly, without softening or obscuring that position.", "Jade Reynolds": "Jade Reynolds must state plainly that missed chances matter more to Jade Reynolds than possible embarras... | {"Elena Hart": "Elena Hart must frame the disagreement as a negotiation over what counts as a valid reason, acknowledging Jade Reynolds's point while insisting Elena Hart's reluctance remain part of the decision standard.", "Jade Reynolds": "Jade Reynolds must keep steering the exchange toward Jade Reynolds's preferred... | {"Elena Hart": "Elena Hart must monitor Jade Reynolds's joking, direct challenges, interruptions, forward posture, or sustained gaze and respond by clarifying the boundary, slowing the pace, or reframing the issue toward respect for Elena Hart's stated reluctance.", "Jade Reynolds": "Jade Reynolds must watch for Elena ... | {"Elena Hart": "Elena Hart secures a conversational outcome in which Jade Reynolds explicitly recognizes Elena Hart's discomfort with performing as a valid reason not to treat the audition lightly, with both participants' dialogue, reframing, and visible slowing or pausing showing that Elena Hart's boundary has shaped ... | {"Elena Hart": {"belief": "Elena believes Jade is seriously trying to persuade her to consider the Cats audition despite her stated discomfort with performing.", "desire": "Elena wants her reluctance to be recognized as a valid position within the conversation.", "intention": "Elena intends to continue asserting that d... | images/scenario_049/group_labeled.png | {"Elena Hart": "images/scenario_049/individual/character_02.jpg", "Jade Reynolds": "images/scenario_049/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_76 | scenario_050 | medium | Deliberation | 2 | Elena; Ben | In the living room late in the evening, Elena and Ben focus on agreeing on an immediate way to continue their discussion about starting a family, deciding whether to stay where they are or shift it to coffee. Their exchange centers on choosing a concrete next step that keeps the conversation active while fitting around... | {"Ben": "Deliberator", "Elena": "Deliberator"} | {"Ben": "Honest Signaling", "Elena": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ben": "Compromising", "Elena": "Competing"} | {"Ben": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "office worker"}, "Elena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "office worker"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ben at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben must state plainly which immediate arrangement Ben can realistically manage tonight, including how the option fits Ben's early morning obligations without obscuring limits.", "Elena": "Elena must state directly that Elena wants a clear decision now on staying in the living room or shifting to coffee, while... | {"Ben": "Ben must pursue a mutually acceptable choice by offering or evaluating both staying in the living room and going for coffee in terms of practical timing and shared continuation of the discussion.", "Elena": "Elena must push for selecting one immediate option without drifting into delay, using firm proposals or... | {"Ben": "Ben must monitor Elena's agreement, reframing, interruption patterns, facial tightening, gaze direction, or posture changes and then adjust Ben's pace, concession level, or framing to maintain coordination on an immediate workable next step.", "Elena": "Elena must watch for Ben's hesitation, interruptions, gaz... | {"Ben": "Ben and Elena reach a mutually stated immediate arrangement to continue the starting-a-family discussion either in the living room or over coffee tonight, with Elena accepting the option aloud and Ben confirming its fit with the early morning obligation through dialogue and observable settling of the exchange.... | {"Ben": {"belief": "They need to keep the discussion moving, but the choice of whether to stay or go out should fit within his need to be ready for an early morning.", "desire": "To reach a workable immediate arrangement that allows the conversation to continue without creating conflict with his next-day obligations.",... | images/scenario_050/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_050/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_050/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_77 | scenario_051 | medium | Deliberation | 3 | Ethan; Maggie; Lena | At Lena's bedside, Ethan and Maggie repeat breathing cues and count down the remaining seconds of a contraction while each tries to establish a pacing style Lena will follow. The exchange focuses on settling a clear, coordinated form of support that Lena can signal works best for her in the moment. | {"Ethan": "Deliberator", "Lena": "Deliberator", "Maggie": "Deliberator"} | {"Ethan": "Deception", "Lena": "Honest Signaling", "Maggie": "Exaggeration"} | {"Ethan": "Competing", "Lena": "Accommodating", "Maggie": "Competing"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "labor support partner"}, "Lena": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "patient"}, "Maggie": {"age": "30s", "c... | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Lena": "Neutral", "Maggie": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lena at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Maggie": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Maggie at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan should present Ethan's breathing cues and countdown as if Lena is already responding best to Ethan's wording while avoiding any acknowledgment that Maggie's pacing could work equally well.", "Lena": "Lena should state directly which wording, tempo, or countdown pattern Lena can follow in the moment and... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should steer the bedside exchange toward Ethan's method by asserting Ethan's cues first, sustaining an authoritative cadence, and resisting shifts that would let Maggie set the pacing.", "Lena": "Lena should preserve coordination by yielding status concerns and centering the bedside exchange on the sup... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should watch for Maggie's interruptions, Lena's hesitation, and Lena's gaze or breathing shifts, then tighten or soften Ethan's delivery and reframe Ethan's method as the clearest option when those signals suggest Ethan's lead is slipping.", "Lena": "Lena should track agreement, overlap, hesitation, ga... | {"Ethan": "Ethan, through Ethan's authoritative cues and reframing, should bring about a moment in which Lena follows Ethan's wording and countdown while Maggie reduces overlap or adjusts Maggie's delivery in response to Lena's signals, making Ethan's pacing the accepted bedside lead.", "Lena": "Lena, by directly signa... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "He believes Lena is relying on verbal pacing during the contraction and that the guidance needs to sound clear and authoritative in the moment.", "desire": "He wants the support approach being used at Lena's bedside to be accepted as the one she follows.", "intention": "He commits to framing the b... | images/scenario_051/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_051/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lena": "images/scenario_051/individual/character_03.jpg", "Maggie": "images/scenario_051/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_78 | scenario_052 | medium | Eristic | 2 | Ethan; Maggie | Just outside the doorway after Carol sends Ethan out, Ethan and Maggie confront each other in the hallway over who is to blame for Carol's reaction and what happened inside. Ethan responds in a guarded, selective way to avoid conceding responsibility, while Maggie states her accusations plainly and keeps the exchange f... | {"Ethan": "Quarreller", "Maggie": "Quarreller"} | {"Ethan": "Strategic Withholding", "Maggie": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ethan": "Collaborating", "Maggie": "Competing"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "software engineer"}, "Maggie": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "elementary school teacher"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Maggie": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Maggie": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Maggie at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must answer Maggie with selective details, omissions, and narrowed phrasing that avoid direct concession while keeping his account consistent with preserving standing.", "Maggie": "Maggie must state accusations and responsibility claims in direct, explicit language that transparently presents Maggie's ... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must position the hallway exchange as a joint clarification of what happened by challenging Maggie's claims and proposing shared interpretation rather than accepting sole blame.", "Maggie": "Maggie must press Ethan's role assertively, prioritize establishing Ethan's responsibility over relational ease,... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Maggie's interruptions, hesitation, reframing, fixed gaze, or posture tightening and respond by shortening answers, delaying concessions, or shifting framing toward disputed evidence.", "Maggie": "Maggie must track Ethan's guarded wording, pauses, deflections, gaze shifts, or stance chan... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Maggie must end the hallway exchange with both participants explicitly presenting incompatible accounts of Carol's reaction, where Ethan's selective replies and blame-redirecting challenges prevent Maggie from securing an uncontested admission that Ethan was chiefly responsible.", "Maggie": "Maggie... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Carol's decision to send him out has made the hallway exchange a test of who is held responsible for what happened inside, and Maggie is framing his role as part of that blame.", "desire": "To prevent Maggie's account from defining him as chiefly responsible and to preserve his standing in the dis... | images/scenario_052/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_052/individual/character_01.jpg", "Maggie": "images/scenario_052/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_79 | scenario_052 | medium | Eristic | 2 | Ethan; Maggie | In the hallway outside the doorway, Ethan and Maggie argue at close range over what Carol's reaction means and who should bear responsibility for what happened inside. Each responds by resisting blame and contesting the other's account, turning the exchange into a sharper struggle over credibility rather than resolutio... | {"Ethan": "Quarreller", "Maggie": "Quarreller"} | {"Ethan": "Suppression", "Maggie": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ethan": "Competing", "Maggie": "Collaborating"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "software engineer"}, "Maggie": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "elementary school teacher"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Maggie": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Maggie": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Maggie at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must keep key self-incriminating details unstated while speaking in clipped rebuttals that cast doubt on Maggie's reading of Carol's reaction without directly clarifying his full role.", "Maggie": "Maggie must state her account plainly and directly, naming Ethan's contribution and Carol's reaction with... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must press a competing line that contests Maggie's account, resists accepting blame, and reframes Carol's decision as shaped by Maggie rather than as proof of Ethan's fault.", "Maggie": "Maggie must use a collaborating stance by answering Ethan's claims with specific counterpoints that keep attention o... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Maggie's interruptions, hesitation, reframing, narrowed gaze, forward posture, or jaw tension and respond by tightening timing, escalating counterclaims, or redirecting the topic back to Maggie's influence on Carol.", "Maggie": "Maggie must track Ethan's interruptions, evasive phrasing, ... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Maggie reach a visible impasse in which Ethan's clipped rebuttals and redirections to Maggie's influence are met by Maggie's direct counterpoints about Carol's response, leaving both participants explicitly contesting Ethan's responsibility and Ethan's credibility unresolved.", "Maggie": "Maggie an... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Carol's decision to send him out is being used by Maggie as evidence against his role in what happened inside, and the hallway exchange is now centered on assigning blame.", "desire": "To avoid being positioned as primarily responsible for the conflict inside and to preserve his standing in the di... | images/scenario_052/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_052/individual/character_01.jpg", "Maggie": "images/scenario_052/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_80 | scenario_069 | medium | Information-seeking | 2 | Dr. Michael Chen; Sarah Bennett | In the hospital waiting area, Dr. Michael Chen briefly frames a point about how demanding work can extend beyond the workplace by asking Sarah Bennett about her job. Sarah provides the relevant information he is seeking, and their short public exchange stays focused on using her occupation as the basis for his comparis... | {"Dr. Michael Chen": "Questioner", "Sarah Bennett": "Answerer"} | {"Dr. Michael Chen": "Deception", "Sarah Bennett": "Suppression"} | {"Dr. Michael Chen": "Competing", "Sarah Bennett": "Compromising"} | {"Dr. Michael Chen": {"age": "40s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "physician"}, "Sarah Bennett": {"age": "20s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "waitress"}} | {"Dr. Michael Chen": "Neutral", "Sarah Bennett": "Neutral"} | {"Dr. Michael Chen": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Dr. Michael Chen at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Sarah Bennett": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Sarah Bennett at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Dr. Michael Chen": "Dr. Michael Chen should phrase the question as if it is a neutral inquiry while steering Sarah Bennett toward occupational details that specifically validate his comparison and omitting that persuasive purpose.", "Sarah Bennett": "Sarah Bennett should provide only the occupational information need... | {"Dr. Michael Chen": "Dr. Michael Chen should keep control of the exchange by directing the topic toward work demands and using Sarah Bennett's answer primarily to advance his own explanatory point despite the public setting.", "Sarah Bennett": "Sarah Bennett should maintain a limited cooperative stance by giving enoug... | {"Dr. Michael Chen": "Dr. Michael Chen should watch for Sarah Bennett's brief replies, hesitation, interruptions, gaze shifts, or posture tightening and respond by either sharpening the question to recover relevance or reducing explicitness to protect the framing.", "Sarah Bennett": "Sarah Bennett should monitor Dr. Mi... | {"Dr. Michael Chen": "Dr. Michael Chen secures a brief reply from Sarah Bennett that explicitly identifies Sarah Bennett's job and is then treated within the dialogue as sufficient support for Dr. Michael Chen's comparison about work demands extending beyond formal work hours, as shown by Dr. Michael Chen's framing lan... | {"Dr. Michael Chen": {"belief": "He believes that Sarah's occupation can serve as a relevant example for his point about work demands extending beyond formal work hours, and that asking about her job is an acceptable way to frame that comparison in this public exchange.", "desire": "He wants Sarah to provide occupation... | images/scenario_069/group_labeled.png | {"Dr. Michael Chen": "images/scenario_069/individual/character_01.jpg", "Sarah Bennett": "images/scenario_069/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_01 | scenario_053 | high | Information-seeking | 4 | Emily; Ryan; Daniel; Lily | In the coffeehouse lounge, Ryan, Daniel, and Lily keep questioning Emily about the man she is meeting, each trying to push the group toward a clearer interpretation of the dinner. Emily responds by limiting the significance of the outing and maintaining that it should be understood as simply dinner with a coworker rath... | {"Daniel": "Questioner", "Emily": "Answerer", "Lily": "Questioner", "Ryan": "Questioner"} | {"Daniel": "Deception", "Emily": "Exaggeration", "Lily": "Exaggeration", "Ryan": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Daniel": "Competing", "Emily": "Competing", "Lily": "Competing", "Ryan": "Competing"} | {"Daniel": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "freelance writer"}, "Emily": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "restaurant manager"}, "Lily": {"age": "... | {"Daniel": "Neutral", "Emily": "Neutral", "Lily": "Neutral", "Ryan": "Neutral"} | {"Daniel": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Daniel at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Emily": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Emily at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lily": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lily at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ryan": "No clear facial ... | {"Daniel": "Daniel must use deceptive teasing that sounds playful while actually steering Emily toward specific commitments that expose whether the coworker dinner carries more significance than stated.", "Emily": "Emily must exaggerate the ordinary, work-related quality of the dinner in dialogue and demeanor so the ou... | {"Daniel": "Daniel must compete by maneuvering for informational advantage through strategically framed questions that corner Emily into clarifying details on Daniel's terms.", "Emily": "Emily must competitively shut down attempts to redefine the dinner by asserting a narrow interpretation and resisting lines of questi... | {"Daniel": "Daniel must monitor Emily's nervous laughter, delayed replies, crossed arms, glances toward Ryan or Lily, and reactions to reframing, then escalate ambiguity when Emily wavers or switch to sharper specificity when Emily starts to concede ground.", "Emily": "Emily must watch for interruptions, skeptical refr... | {"Daniel": "Daniel draws Emily into a more specific reply through teasing questions that sound playful, and Ryan or Lily uses Emily's wording, pauses, or visible hesitation to support a stronger interpretation than 'just dinner.'", "Emily": "Emily secures repeated verbal acknowledgment from Ryan, Daniel, or Lily that t... | {"Daniel": {"belief": "Emily is withholding or softening relevant details about the coworker dinner, and the conversation rewards whoever can expose inconsistencies first.", "desire": "To gain informational advantage in the group by steering Emily into revealing more than she intends.", "intention": "To pose teasing qu... | images/scenario_053/group_labeled.png | {"Daniel": "images/scenario_053/individual/character_03.jpg", "Emily": "images/scenario_053/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lily": "images/scenario_053/individual/character_04.jpg", "Ryan": "images/scenario_053/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_02 | scenario_001 | high | Information-seeking | 2 | Elena; Daniel | At the restaurant table, Elena responds to Daniel's breakup story by directly asking how he managed a similar situation, using his experience as the focus of the exchange. Daniel answers in a way that keeps the conversation on his account while both of them frame the discussion through joking examples of petty post-bre... | {"Daniel": "Answerer", "Elena": "Questioner"} | {"Daniel": "Exaggeration", "Elena": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Daniel": "Competing", "Elena": "Competing"} | {"Daniel": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "marketing professional"}, "Elena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "female", "occupation": "freelance writer"}} | {"Daniel": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Daniel": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Daniel": "Daniel must answer by exaggerating illustrative petty post-breakup examples to signal usable experience while avoiding statements that make his account sound unreliable or purely performative.", "Elena": "Elena must ask for Daniel's breakup handling methods through example-focused questions while withholdin... | {"Daniel": "Daniel must competitively keep the floor on his own breakup account and present his examples as the main source of guidance rather than letting the exchange become an evaluation of his credibility.", "Elena": "Elena must competitively steer turn content toward Daniel's firsthand account and keep the advice ... | {"Daniel": "Daniel must track Elena's agreement, reframing, pauses, eye focus, and tension cues, then increase or reduce humorous emphasis and detail so Elena remains engaged and Daniel's perspective continues to seem helpful.", "Elena": "Elena must monitor Daniel's joking, hesitation, interruptions, gaze shifts, and p... | {"Daniel": "Daniel establishes himself to Elena as a credible source of breakup guidance by maintaining the floor with exaggerated petty-revenge examples that Elena accepts through continued questions, responsive framing, and observable engagement cues.", "Elena": "Elena secures from Daniel a sustained example-based ac... | {"Daniel": {"belief": "Elena is treating his breakup story as a source of advice, and his response will shape whether he is seen as helpful and credible in the conversation.", "desire": "To present himself as someone with usable experience while keeping the exchange socially comfortable through humorous framing.", "int... | images/scenario_001/group_labeled.png | {"Daniel": "images/scenario_001/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_001/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_03 | scenario_002 | high | Deliberation | 2 | Elena; Lila | In the shared apartment that morning, Elena and Lila use their conversation over drinks to clarify the day's separate responsibilities. Lila frames her coffee shop shift as the fixed priority, while Elena presents finding paid work as her immediate plan, allowing both of them to leave with a clear division of purpose. | {"Elena": "Deliberator", "Lila": "Deliberator"} | {"Elena": "Exaggeration", "Lila": "Suppression"} | {"Elena": "Competing", "Lila": "Competing"} | {"Elena": {"age": "early 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "job seeker"}, "Lila": {"age": "early 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "coffee shop employee"}} | {"Elena": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Elena": "Elena must describe the day's job search as immediate and concrete with amplified specificity or scope so her plan appears clearly purposeful beside Lila's fixed shift.", "Lila": "Lila must state the coffee shop shift as the day's fixed priority while keeping unstated any extra commentary that could blur the... | {"Elena": "Elena must press the conversation toward recognizing job seeking as a valid parallel priority and resist any framing that places Elena's role as secondary to Lila's work commitment.", "Lila": "Lila must steer the exchange toward a firm separation of responsibilities centered on Lila's scheduled shift and rej... | {"Elena": "Elena must watch for Lila's agreement, hesitation, interruption, narrowed gaze, or posture tightening and respond by increasing detail, shortening claims, or restating the division of responsibilities more forcefully.", "Lila": "Lila must track Elena's agreement, hesitation, embellishment, interruptions, gaz... | {"Elena": "Elena and Lila explicitly end the exchange with matching verbal acknowledgment that Lila's shift is fixed and Elena's immediate task is a concrete job search, with Elena's amplified descriptions and forceful restatements leading Lila to confirm that Elena's role is purposeful rather than secondary.", "Lila":... | {"Elena": {"belief": "Lila has a fixed work responsibility today, and Elena is expected to use the day to pursue paid work opportunities.", "desire": "To establish that her next step is a legitimate and immediate job search so the day's responsibilities are clearly divided.", "intention": "To commit to presenting job s... | images/scenario_002/group_labeled.png | {"Elena": "images/scenario_002/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_002/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_04 | scenario_003 | high | Information-seeking | 2 | Elena; Ben | Near the entrance to an exhibit in the museum's natural history area, Elena asks Ben whether the woman who has just appeared outside the exhibit is his ex-wife, seeking clear recognition of who the nearby visitor is in relation to him. As Ben answers while the woman is acknowledged from nearby, he frames the relationsh... | {"Ben": "Answerer", "Elena": "Questioner"} | {"Ben": "Suppression", "Elena": "Suppression"} | {"Ben": "Competing", "Elena": "Competing"} | {"Ben": {"age": "36", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "museum visitor"}, "Elena": {"age": "35", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "museum visitor"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben answers with a bounded and minimally elaborated statement that defines the woman's relation clearly enough to be recognized while withholding unnecessary personal detail.", "Elena": "Elena asks Ben for identification of the woman in a controlled and concise way that withholds extra interpretation about the... | {"Ben": "Ben maintains a competing stance by setting the relationship framing on Ben's own terms and steering the exchange toward an orderly continuation to the Ice Age section.", "Elena": "Elena maintains a competing stance by pressing for a direct answer that secures Elena's own social clarity at the exhibit entrance... | {"Ben": "Ben tracks Elena's interruptions, follow-up wording, and facial focus as well as the nearby woman's gaze and distance, and if signs of doubt or social scrutiny increase, Ben makes the answer more explicit and shortens the transition delay.", "Elena": "Elena monitors Ben's wording, pauses, gaze shifts toward th... | {"Ben": "Ben states clearly enough that the nearby woman is his ex-wife that Elena stops pressing for clarification and the interaction shifts toward the Ice Age section with the relationship status visibly settled rather than left ambiguous at the exhibit boundary.", "Elena": "Elena receives from Ben a direct identifi... | {"Ben": {"belief": "Ben believes Elena has noticed the woman outside the exhibit and expects him to clarify whether she is his ex-wife while the woman is close enough to be socially acknowledged.", "desire": "Ben wants to manage how the relationship to the woman is understood by Elena and by the nearby woman as he tran... | images/scenario_003/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_003/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_003/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_05 | scenario_070 | high | Eristic | 4 | Ethan; Lila; Clara; Brett | In the living room and adjoining kitchen, Ethan, Lila, Clara, and Brett turn the paper ball, the half-finished drink, and Clara's tidying into a contest over whose account of the apartment and its readiness should prevail before her parents arrive. Clara tries to keep the situation framed as under control, Ethan and Li... | {"Brett": "Auxiliary", "Clara": "Quarreller", "Ethan": "Quarreller", "Lila": "Quarreller"} | {"Brett": "Suppression", "Clara": "Deception", "Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Lila": "Exaggeration"} | {"Brett": "Accommodating", "Clara": "Competing", "Ethan": "Competing", "Lila": "Competing"} | {"Brett": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "actor"}, "Clara": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "restaurant manager"}, "Ethan": {"age": "late 20s... | {"Brett": "Neutral", "Clara": "Fear", "Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Brett": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Brett at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Clara": "Clara displays visible signs of anxiety as she prepares for her parents' visit.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect... | {"Brett": "Brett must keep Brett's stance indirect by withholding evaluative judgments about the mess and limiting contributions that could reinforce either side of the dispute.", "Clara": "Clara must present the apartment as under control by steering talk toward an acceptable account of the room's condition while obsc... | {"Brett": "Brett must accommodate the group by yielding floor space and avoiding bids to win the argument so the interaction remains workable until attention shifts together.", "Clara": "Clara must compete to secure Clara's framing as the accepted standard by dismissing rival interpretations and re-centering the exchan... | {"Brett": "Brett must watch for rising interruption, hesitation, reframing, sharp looks, rigid posture, and gaze shifts among Ethan, Lila, and Clara, and respond by reducing Brett's verbal involvement, delaying entry, or aligning with the new shared focus at the window when it appears.", "Clara": "Clara must monitor ag... | {"Brett": "Brett's limited verbal involvement and delayed entry must coincide with Ethan, Lila, and Clara dropping direct rebuttals and joining Brett in the abrupt shared turn to the window, producing an observable pause in the dispute that leaves the group socially workable.", "Clara": "Clara's steering of the talk to... | {"Brett": {"belief": "The argument over the clutter is escalating and could worsen the atmosphere before Clara's parents arrive if no common focus interrupts it.", "desire": "To reduce open conflict and keep the group socially workable until the visit proceeds.", "intention": "To avoid reinforcing the dispute and let a... | images/scenario_070/group_labeled.png | {"Brett": "images/scenario_070/individual/character_04.jpg", "Clara": "images/scenario_070/individual/character_03.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_070/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_070/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_06 | scenario_004 | high | Eristic | 3 | Diane; Harold; Lily | During dinner in the family kitchen-dining area, Diane and Lily turn a discussion of a failed wedding and the money tied to it into a dispute over whose interpretation will prevail. Harold joins in not to settle the matter but to make his own framing count, pushing the meal further into a pointed family quarrel. | {"Diane": "Quarreller", "Harold": "Auxiliary", "Lily": "Quarreller"} | {"Diane": "Exaggeration", "Harold": "Suppression", "Lily": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Diane": "Competing", "Harold": "Accommodating", "Lily": "Competing"} | {"Diane": {"age": "50s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Retired"}, "Harold": {"age": "50s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Retired professional"}, "Lily": {"age": "20s", "char... | {"Diane": "Neutral", "Harold": "Neutral", "Lily": "Neutral"} | {"Diane": "There are no clear facial affect cues for Diane at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Harold": "There are no clear facial affect cues for Harold at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lily": "There are no clear facial affect cues for Lily at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Diane": "Diane must state her interpretation with amplified certainty and enlarged consequences so Lily's position sounds less credible while avoiding any line that weakens Diane's standing in the family discussion.", "Harold": "Harold must present a pointed framing while keeping parts of Harold's full stance indirec... | {"Diane": "Diane must pursue conversational control by directly challenging Lily's interpretation and steering the exchange toward acceptance of Diane's framing over Lily's position.", "Harold": "Harold must accommodate the ongoing quarrel enough to enter it while redirecting the discussion toward Harold's chosen frami... | {"Diane": "Diane must watch for Lily's hesitation, interruption, reframing, tightened posture, gaze shifts, or sharp facial changes and respond by increasing emphasis, cutting in sooner, or restating Diane's framing more forcefully.", "Harold": "Harold must monitor Diane's and Lily's agreement, hesitation, interruption... | {"Diane": "Diane must bring the dinner exchange to a state where Diane and Lily are openly arguing over the failed wedding and the money in competing terms and Harold's contribution is used in the dialogue as support or contrast that keeps Diane's interpretation in active contention rather than letting Lily's version s... | {"Diane": {"belief": "Lily is treating the remark about the failed wedding and its money as a challenge that reflects on Diane's standing in the family discussion.", "desire": "To have her interpretation of the remark and its implications accepted over Lily's position.", "intention": "To press her point in a way that f... | images/scenario_004/group_labeled.png | {"Diane": "images/scenario_004/individual/character_01.jpg", "Harold": "images/scenario_004/individual/character_02.jpg", "Lily": "images/scenario_004/individual/character_03.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_07 | scenario_005 | high | Information-seeking | 2 | Ethan; Lucas | In the quiet apartment rehearsal space, Ethan uses the script pages to prompt Lucas for the next lines so he can keep the exchange accurate and under control as they move between scenes. Lucas responds with each requested line in turn, showing he can keep pace with the script and sustain the shared rehearsal without le... | {"Ethan": "Questioner", "Lucas": "Answerer"} | {"Ethan": "Deception", "Lucas": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ethan": "Competing", "Lucas": "Competing"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "theater actor"}, "Lucas": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "theater actor"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Lucas": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "There are no clear facial affect cues available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lucas": "There are no clear facial affect cues available for Lucas at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan should phrase prompts as if Ethan is merely checking sequence while using selective cues from the script pages to conceal how much Ethan needs Lucas's accuracy to maintain control and avoid appearing unreliable.", "Lucas": "Lucas should answer each prompt with the exact corresponding line and, through ... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should direct scene transitions, prompt timing, and line confirmation in a self-prioritizing way that keeps authority over pace and correctness centered on Ethan.", "Lucas": "Lucas should use precise and prompt responses to establish Lucas's own competence and reliability in the rehearsal rather than y... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should watch for Lucas's immediate answers, hesitation, interruptions, gaze to the pages, or posture tightening and respond by tightening prompts, delaying transitions, or reframing requests to reassert control without openly admitting dependence.", "Lucas": "Lucas should monitor Ethan's agreement, int... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Lucas complete multiple scene-to-scene exchanges in which Ethan's prompts set the pace and Lucas's matching lines confirm the sequence, with their dialogue, page-checking, and timing jointly showing that correctness remains publicly centered on Ethan's management.", "Lucas": "Lucas and Ethan sustai... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "He believes the rehearsal depends on Lucas providing the correct next lines so the exchange can continue accurately from scene to scene.", "desire": "He wants to maintain control over the pace and correctness of the rehearsal while confirming that the dialogue sequence is being followed properly."... | images/scenario_005/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_005/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lucas": "images/scenario_005/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_08 | scenario_071 | high | Persuasion | 5 | Ava; Lena; Mark; Ethan; Sara | In the coffeehouse lounge's familiar seating area, attention shifts to Ethan's lit cigarette, and the group converges on the question of whether he should resume smoking after having quit. Mark openly argues that he should put it out and not return to the habit, while Ava, Lena, and Sara are positioned within a convers... | {"Ava": "Auxiliary", "Ethan": "Respondent", "Lena": "Auxiliary", "Mark": "Proponent", "Sara": "Auxiliary"} | {"Ava": "Honest Signaling", "Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Lena": "Honest Signaling", "Mark": "Honest Signaling", "Sara": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ava": "Accommodating", "Ethan": "Competing", "Lena": "Accommodating", "Mark": "Competing", "Sara": "Accommodating"} | {"Ava": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "barista"}, "Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "writer"}, "Lena": {"age": "late 20s"... | {"Ava": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral", "Lena": "Neutral", "Mark": "Neutral", "Sara": "Neutral"} | {"Ava": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ava at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lena at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Mark": "No clear facial affect... | {"Ava": "Ava states plainly that the cigarette dispute is overtaking the shared exchange and frames Ava's contribution around restoring a workable shared understanding without overstating any side.", "Ethan": "Ethan states openly that the lit cigarette does not grant the group authority over Ethan's decision and presen... | {"Ava": "Ava positions Ava's remarks to reduce the dispute's prominence and support a socially acceptable resolution even if Ava's own stance remains secondary to group cohesion.", "Ethan": "Ethan adopts a competing stance by resisting Mark's challenge and maintaining that acceptance of Ethan's smoking remains Ethan's ... | {"Ava": "Ava watches for interruption, hesitation, tightened posture, and gaze withdrawal from Mark, Ethan, Lena, and Sara, then softens timing and reframes Ava's wording toward common ground when escalation cues appear.", "Ethan": "Ethan watches for Mark's interruptions, reframing attempts, fixed gaze, and tension cue... | {"Ava": "Ava helps bring about a group exchange in which Mark and Ethan stop repeating opposing claims, Lena or Sara reinforce Ava's common-ground framing, and the conversation visibly shifts away from the cigarette dispute toward a workable shared understanding.", "Ethan": "Ethan brings about an interaction in which M... | {"Ava": {"belief": "A disagreement has emerged around Ethan's lit cigarette, and the group interaction is being redirected toward whether he should resume smoking.", "desire": "To restore a workable shared understanding that keeps the group exchange from being dominated by the smoking dispute.", "intention": "To align ... | images/scenario_071/group_labeled.png | {"Ava": "images/scenario_071/individual/character_01.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_071/individual/character_04.jpg", "Lena": "images/scenario_071/individual/character_02.jpg", "Mark": "images/scenario_071/individual/character_03.jpg", "Sara": "images/scenario_071/individual/character_05.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_09 | scenario_006 | high | Information-seeking | 3 | Ethan; Lila; Ben | In the busy coffeehouse lounge, Ethan responds to Lila's report with disbelief and presses for a clear verbal confirmation of what was found in the drink. Lila answers by specifying the object and offers to show it as proof, while Ben inserts a joking remark before the others quickly reject seeing it and rely on her de... | {"Ben": "Auxiliary", "Ethan": "Questioner", "Lila": "Answerer"} | {"Ben": "Suppression", "Ethan": "Suppression", "Lila": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ben": "Accommodating", "Ethan": "Competing", "Lila": "Competing"} | {"Ben": {"age": "33", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "copywriter"}, "Ethan": {"age": "32", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "university lecturer"}, "Lila": {"age": "28", "characteris... | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben must keep his own stance indirect by inserting a joke rather than giving a detailed reaction and by withholding graphic elaboration.", "Ethan": "Ethan must ask for explicit verbal confirmation of what was found while keeping personal evaluation and speculative wording minimized or indirect.", "Lila": "Lila... | {"Ben": "Ben must prioritize group ease over his own influence by aligning quickly with the others' refusal to inspect the object.", "Ethan": "Ethan must steer the exchange toward a definite account by insistently prioritizing clear confirmation over leaving Lila's report open-ended.", "Lila": "Lila must hold the floor... | {"Ben": "Ben must monitor whether Ethan presses harder, whether Lila insists on showing proof, and whether others display rejection through interruption, facial tightening, or leaning back, then trim the joke, withdraw, or affirm the no-viewing stance to stay aligned with the group.", "Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Lil... | {"Ben": "Ben's joking insertion is followed by alignment with Ethan and Lila's visible refusal to view the object, producing an outcome in which the group keeps the exchange manageable by relying on Lila's spoken description instead of inspecting the proof.", "Ethan": "Ethan secures from Lila a clear spoken identificat... | {"Ben": {"belief": "He believes the discovery is unpleasant and that the conversation could become overly tense or graphic.", "desire": "He wants to keep the group's interaction manageable while still participating in the discussion.", "intention": "He commits to framing his contribution as a joke and aligning with the... | images/scenario_006/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_006/individual/character_03.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_006/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_006/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_10 | scenario_007 | high | Deliberation | 2 | Elena; Diane | During a lull in the restaurant kitchen, Elena and Diane confer near their station in direct, practical terms about whether ending an unsatisfying relationship can be justified despite its effect on five other people tied to the man involved. Elena presses for the breakup to be viewed as the right course, while Diane h... | {"Diane": "Deliberator", "Elena": "Deliberator"} | {"Diane": "Strategic Withholding", "Elena": "Deception"} | {"Diane": "Competing", "Elena": "Competing"} | {"Diane": {"age": "40s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "female", "occupation": "head chef"}, "Elena": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "chef"}} | {"Diane": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Diane": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Diane": "Diane must keep part of Diane's assessment unspoken while stating only enough about the five other people's stake to test whether Elena recognizes the broader consequences.", "Elena": "Elena must present the breakup as justified by selectively shaping claims about the relationship and downplaying the five ot... | {"Diane": "Diane must hold a firm position that prioritizes scrutiny of wider social effects over Elena's preferred framing and challenge any push to treat the breakup as justified too quickly.", "Elena": "Elena must press a self-advantaging line that treats support for the breakup as the target outcome and resists Dia... | {"Diane": "Diane must track Elena's insistence, deflection, interruption, gaze shifts, posture changes, and tension cues and then tighten or relax questioning, timing, and framing to keep attention on the wider group's impact.", "Elena": "Elena must watch for Diane's hesitation, interruption, reframing, tightened postu... | {"Diane": "Diane and Elena arrive at a stated interactional result in which Elena concedes in dialogue that any claim that the breakup is justified must address the effects on the five other people before Diane allows the discussion to settle on that conclusion, as evidenced by Diane's selective withholding, Elena's re... | {"Diane": {"belief": "Diane believes the decision is not limited to the couple because a breakup would affect five additional people in their shared social circle.", "desire": "Diane wants a course of action that acknowledges the wider social consequences before treating the breakup as the best option.", "intention": "... | images/scenario_007/group_labeled.png | {"Diane": "images/scenario_007/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_007/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_11 | scenario_008 | high | Persuasion | 3 | Clara; Elena; Mia | In the quiet neighborhood café, Clara argues that Elena should come back home, while Elena insists that her restaurant job shows she is building a valid life where she is. From beside them, Mia questions Elena's account of that work, reinforcing doubt about whether it supports Elena's case for staying. | {"Clara": "Proponent", "Elena": "Respondent", "Mia": "Auxiliary"} | {"Clara": "Suppression", "Elena": "Suppression", "Mia": "Deception"} | {"Clara": "Competing", "Elena": "Competing", "Mia": "Accommodating"} | {"Clara": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "unspecified"}, "Elena": {"age": "20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "waitress"}, "Mia": {"age": "20s", "characteristics":... | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral", "Mia": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Mia": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Mia at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must keep Clara's stance indirect by questioning whether the restaurant job is enough without fully stating all of Clara's reasoning, so Clara avoids exposing weak points that could reduce Clara's credibility.", "Elena": "Elena must defend the restaurant job as proof of a valid life while keeping vulne... | {"Clara": "Clara must press the discussion toward the conclusion that Elena should return home by repeatedly contesting the job as sufficient justification and resisting shifts that validate Elena's current life.", "Elena": "Elena must hold a firm self-advancing position by insisting that the job counts as legitimate e... | {"Clara": "Clara must watch for Elena's hesitation, Mia's reinforcement, interruptions, gaze shifts, or posture tightening, and then sharpen or soften Clara's phrasing and timing to keep control of the discussion without openly overcommitting details.", "Elena": "Elena must track Clara's reframing, Mia's skeptical ques... | {"Clara": "Clara secures a discussion state in which Clara's questioning and Mia's reinforcing challenges lead Elena to answer defensively and leave the restaurant job unconfirmed as sufficient reason to stay, as shown through the exchanged claims, Elena's guarded omissions, and the others' gaze and timing shifts.", "E... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Elena is defending staying where she is by presenting her restaurant job as evidence that her current life is viable, and Mia's challenge supports questioning that claim.", "desire": "Clara wants the discussion to establish that Elena should return home rather than treat her current job as suffici... | images/scenario_008/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_008/individual/character_01.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_008/individual/character_02.jpg", "Mia": "images/scenario_008/individual/character_03.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_12 | scenario_054 | high | Information-seeking | 2 | Elena; Sophie | By the seating area near the windows, Elena takes an unexpected call about a credit card account, asks what the caller wants, and relays the inquiry to Sophie. From her seat, Sophie gives her response through Elena, but the exchange shifts into a sharp verbal breakdown that ends with the call being cut off. | {"Elena": "Questioner", "Sophie": "Answerer"} | {"Elena": "Honest Signaling", "Sophie": "Suppression"} | {"Elena": "Competing", "Sophie": "Competing"} | {"Elena": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "restaurant manager"}, "Sophie": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "waitress"}} | {"Elena": "Neutral", "Sophie": "Neutral"} | {"Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Sophie": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Elena": "Elena must ask the caller for the specific reason for the account inquiry and relay Sophie's words to the caller without altering or omitting the stated content.", "Sophie": "Sophie must state a concise position through Elena while withholding extra justification beyond what Sophie wants conveyed about the a... | {"Elena": "Elena must control the exchange by pressing for a direct explanation from the caller and delivering Sophie's response in a firm, resolution-oriented manner.", "Sophie": "Sophie must use Elena as a channel to impose a decisive endpoint to the inquiry rather than allowing negotiation or extended clarification.... | {"Elena": "Elena must watch for caller interruption or hesitation and for Sophie's gaze shifts, posture tightening, or clipped replies, then adjust pacing by either repeating the question, shortening the relay, or cutting off further elaboration.", "Sophie": "Sophie must monitor Elena's wording and timing along with si... | {"Elena": "Elena brings the mediated exchange with Sophie to an observable endpoint where the caller's reason is stated, Sophie's position is relayed in Elena's firm wording, and the breakdown is evidenced by clipped dialogue, Sophie’s tightening posture or fixed gaze, and the call being cut off.", "Sophie": "Sophie pr... | {"Elena": {"belief": "The caller is seeking an explanation about a credit card account, and Sophie is the person who needs to provide the relevant response through Elena.", "desire": "To obtain a clear reason for the call and relay Sophie's response in a way that resolves the inquiry.", "intention": "To mediate the exc... | images/scenario_054/group_labeled.png | {"Elena": "images/scenario_054/individual/character_01.jpg", "Sophie": "images/scenario_054/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_13 | scenario_055 | high | Deliberation | 3 | Elena; Lila; Clara | In the living room, Elena and Clara informally debate how the group should interpret an increasingly unreliable plan, with Elena pushing for a more definite practical reading and Clara trying to preserve flexibility about what outcomes remain plausible. From the side, Lila contributes brief prompts and reactions that k... | {"Clara": "Deliberator", "Elena": "Deliberator", "Lila": "Auxiliary"} | {"Clara": "Deception", "Elena": "Honest Signaling", "Lila": "Exaggeration"} | {"Clara": "Competing", "Elena": "Competing", "Lila": "Accommodating"} | {"Clara": {"age": "28-30", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "early-career professional"}, "Elena": {"age": "28-30", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "early-career professional"}, "L... | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Elena": "Sadness", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "There are no clear facial affect cues for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "Elena displays visible signs of sadness as she expresses uncertainty and feeling lost.", "Lila": "There are no clear facial affect cues for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must strategically frame the uncertainty so flexibility appears more justified than it is by selectively emphasizing plausible outcomes and downplaying reasons to treat ordinary alternatives as the default.", "Elena": "Elena must state a direct assessment that the plan is no longer reliable and explici... | {"Clara": "Clara must compete for influence by resisting quick closure, contesting Elena's definite reading, and steering the discussion toward preserving multiple plausible outcomes.", "Elena": "Elena must push the discussion toward a clear group position by asserting her interpretation first, challenging flexible fra... | {"Clara": "Clara must monitor Elena's direct challenges, Lila's prompts, interruptions, narrowed gaze, leaning in, or tension cues and respond by delaying commitment, reframing terms, or lowering explicitness until flexibility regains footing.", "Elena": "Elena must watch for Clara's reframing, Lila's brief reinforceme... | {"Clara": "Clara must shape the interaction so that Elena's push for a definite practical reading is explicitly countered and the group's ongoing formulation still leaves multiple outcomes open as plausible, with Lila's reinforcing prompts helping keep Clara's flexible framing in circulation.", "Elena": "Elena must bri... | {"Clara": {"belief": "The original plan has weakened, but the uncertainty still allows room to shape how strongly the group commits to fallback expectations.", "desire": "To influence the conversation toward an interpretation of the situation that preserves flexibility about what outcome remains plausible.", "intention... | images/scenario_055/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_055/individual/character_03.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_055/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_055/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_14 | scenario_056 | high | Eristic | 3 | Ben; Clara; Leo | At the reception counter, Ben argues that his situation should be treated as urgent, while Clara insists that intake must proceed in order and answers in openly sarcastic terms. Leo sides with Ben and questions the delay as well, turning the public exchange into a direct dispute over priority and authority at the desk. | {"Ben": "Quarreller", "Clara": "Quarreller", "Leo": "Auxiliary"} | {"Ben": "Honest Signaling", "Clara": "Honest Signaling", "Leo": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ben": "Competing", "Clara": "Competing", "Leo": "Accommodating"} | {"Ben": {"age": "40s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Patient"}, "Clara": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Hospital Receptionist"}, "Leo": {"age": "20s", "ch... | {"Ben": "Anger", "Clara": "Neutral", "Leo": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "Ben shows visible signs of discomfort and urgency on his face at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Clara": "There are no clear facial affect cues for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Leo": "There are no clear facial affect cues for Leo at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben must state his claim of urgency and his objection to the current wait in direct factual terms without masking or overstating details so his spoken reasons can support exceptional handling without reducing credibility.", "Clara": "Clara must state the intake order and refusal of immediate exception plainly ... | {"Ben": "Ben must keep pressing for priority by openly contesting the queue process at the counter and framing immediate attention as more important than preserving smooth desk flow.", "Clara": "Clara must defend the existing sequence by asserting desk authority, rejecting pressure for special treatment, and prioritizi... | {"Ben": "Ben must watch Clara and Leo for interruption, hesitation, sarcastic reframing, gaze withdrawal, or posture tightening and then adjust by sharpening evidence, slowing turn-taking, or repeating the urgency claim more explicitly.", "Clara": "Clara must monitor Ben and Leo for overlap, questioning, compliance, le... | {"Ben": "Ben secures a public exchange in which Clara explicitly answers Ben's urgency claim and Leo's supporting challenge with a stated decision about whether Ben will remain in normal intake order or receive different handling.", "Clara": "Clara brings the desk dispute to a publicly legible resolution in which Ben a... | {"Ben": {"belief": "He believes the current wait is unjustified for his case and that the front desk is not giving sufficient priority to his request for immediate attention.", "desire": "He wants the receptionist to acknowledge his claim of urgency and move his case ahead of the current service order.", "intention": "... | images/scenario_056/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_056/individual/character_01.jpg", "Clara": "images/scenario_056/individual/character_02.jpg", "Leo": "images/scenario_056/individual/character_03.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_15 | scenario_009 | high | Persuasion | 2 | Ethan; Lila | In the busy coffeehouse, Ethan presses to have the casual conversation treated as grounds for joining Lila at the laundromat later that evening, presenting his case without fully stating his underlying reason. Lila questions both his justification and the terms of the arrangement, and their exchange ends with a cautiou... | {"Ethan": "Proponent", "Lila": "Respondent"} | {"Ethan": "Strategic Withholding", "Lila": "Exaggeration"} | {"Ethan": "Competing", "Lila": "Competing"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "student"}, "Lila": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "laundromat attendant"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must present joining Lila at the laundromat as a reasonable extension of the conversation while withholding the full motive in Ethan's wording and pacing so Ethan avoids appearing to overstep.", "Lila": "Lila must amplify the weakness or incompleteness of Ethan's stated justification in Lila's replies ... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must press for a clear agreement around seven by treating Ethan's request as justified and resisting terms that weaken Ethan's access to the plan.", "Lila": "Lila must contest Ethan's attempt to convert the casual exchange into later access by imposing qualified terms that preserve Lila's discretion ov... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must monitor Lila's questioning, hesitation, interruptions, gaze shifts, and posture changes, then narrow or soften Ethan's framing when resistance rises and restate the arrangement more directly when Lila shows acceptance cues.", "Lila": "Lila must track Ethan's insistence, reframing, pauses, gaze dir... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Lila arrive at a cautious around-seven laundromat agreement in which Ethan's dialogue keeps the request framed as reasonable without stating the full motive, and Lila's questioning, qualified wording, and observable hesitation show that Ethan secured access only under limited terms.", "Lila": "Lila... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Lila is not automatically including him in her evening plan and is evaluating whether his reason for joining is acceptable.", "desire": "To secure Lila's agreement that he can meet her at the laundromat later that evening.", "intention": "To frame his participation as reasonable while limiting how... | images/scenario_009/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_009/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_009/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_16 | scenario_072 | high | Information-seeking | 2 | Ethan; Lila | Near the counter, Ethan asks Lila to fill in the parts of the breakup story he missed and frames the discussion around his current interpretation of what happened. Lila keeps the exchange centered on the actual sequence of events and challenges the assumption he is using to define the situation. | {"Ethan": "Questioner", "Lila": "Answerer"} | {"Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Lila": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ethan": "Competing", "Lila": "Competing"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "office worker"}, "Lila": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "barista"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must state that Ethan only knows part of the breakup story and ask for missing details while openly tying each question to Ethan's current interpretation rather than hiding that basis.", "Lila": "Lila must plainly describe the breakup sequence as Lila remembers it and explicitly identify where Ethan's ... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must keep pressing for details in a way that treats Ethan's assumption as the working frame of the discussion until Lila directly disproves it.", "Lila": "Lila must challenge Ethan's framing directly and keep redirecting the exchange to Lila's account of what happened rather than conceding Ethan's inte... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Lila's direct corrections, hesitation, interruptions, tightened posture, or gaze shifts and respond by either sharpening the request for concrete sequence details or restating Ethan's frame more explicitly.", "Lila": "Lila must monitor Ethan's agreement, reframing, interruptions, fixed g... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Lila reach an explicit point in the dialogue where Ethan's interpretation is either supported with sequence details from Lila or directly rejected by Lila with enough concrete chronology that both participants' words and observable responses show Ethan's framing has been tested rather than left ass... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "He believes he only heard part of the breakup story and that Lila can clarify what actually happened.", "desire": "He wants the account of the breakup to be established in a way that supports his interpretation of the situation.", "intention": "He commits to pressing for specific details and maint... | images/scenario_072/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_072/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_072/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_17 | scenario_073 | high | Eristic | 2 | Clara; Lila | Near the row of machines, Clara treats Lila's basket marker as not constituting a valid reservation and takes the washer for herself, while Lila insists the basket established her priority. Their exchange sharpens into a direct dispute over what counts as a legitimate claim in the crowded laundromat just as another cus... | {"Clara": "Quarreller", "Lila": "Quarreller"} | {"Clara": "Deception", "Lila": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Clara": "Competing", "Lila": "Competing"} | {"Clara": {"age": "20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "laundromat customer"}, "Lila": {"age": "20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "female", "occupation": "laundromat customer"}} | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must state that the washer was open or unclaimed while avoiding acknowledgment that Clara recognized Lila's basket as a reservation marker.", "Lila": "Lila must repeatedly cite the basket as establishing priority while withholding any statements that would accept Clara's definition that only direct mac... | {"Clara": "Clara must press the rule that only direct machine use establishes a valid claim and reject Lila's basket-based definition without offering concession.", "Lila": "Lila must insist on recognition of the basket marker as a valid claim and contest Clara's use of the washer without moving toward a split solution... | {"Clara": "Clara must watch for Lila's interruptions, reframing, fixed gaze, or posture tightening and respond by speaking sooner, repeating the direct-use rule more firmly, or shifting the framing toward shared laundromat norms when another customer's attention appears.", "Lila": "Lila must track Clara's hesitation, i... | {"Clara": "Clara and Lila explicitly arrive at a stated dispute frame in which Clara's use of the washer is treated in the exchange as resting on whether a basket counts as a valid reservation, with Clara verbally denying that standard and Lila directly contesting it in view of another customer's attention.", "Lila": "... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Clara believes Lila is treating the basket as a reservation marker, but that this does not give Lila a valid claim to the washer in the current shared-use setting.", "desire": "Clara wants her use of the washer to be accepted as legitimate in the dispute.", "intention": "Clara intends to frame the... | images/scenario_073/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_073/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_073/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_18 | scenario_057 | high | Information-seeking | 2 | Elena; Ben | In the busy laundromat, Ben explains to Elena how her laundry should be separated, framing the discussion around whites, colors, and delicate items. Elena checks specific garments against those categories and asks where each belongs, relying on Ben's guidance while Ben maintains the lead in defining the sorting rules. | {"Ben": "Answerer", "Elena": "Questioner"} | {"Ben": "Deception", "Elena": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ben": "Competing", "Elena": "Competing"} | {"Ben": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "office worker"}, "Elena": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "graphic designer"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ben at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben must present category rules and garment answers as if fully certain while omitting any limits in Ben's knowledge so Elena treats the guidance as authoritative.", "Elena": "Elena must state her item-by-item uncertainty and garment classifications directly in questions that transparently test whether Ben's s... | {"Ben": "Ben must maintain control of the sorting framework by asserting which items count as whites, colors, or delicates and steering Elena back to Ben's rule-based categories whenever Elena tests the boundaries.", "Elena": "Elena must press for decisive category assignments when Ben's explanations are vague so Elena... | {"Ben": "Ben must watch for Elena's agreement, hesitation, interruptions, facial checking, gaze direction, and tension cues, then increase certainty, simplify the rule, or reframe the answer quickly when Elena shows signs of doubting Ben's guidance.", "Elena": "Elena must monitor Ben's agreement, hesitation, interrupti... | {"Ben": "Ben and Elena arrive at an observable interaction state in which Ben's rule-based sorting framework is treated as the accepted basis for classifying Elena's questioned garments, shown by Ben giving firm category answers, Elena testing and then using those answers, and both participants aligning their talk and ... | {"Ben": {"belief": "Elena is depending on him to define the sorting process and to answer her questions about which garments belong with whites, colors, or delicates.", "desire": "To have Elena accept his guidance as sufficient and authoritative for handling the sorting decisions in this scene.", "intention": "To keep ... | images/scenario_057/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_057/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_057/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_19 | scenario_010 | high | Persuasion | 2 | Elena; Ben | Near the bar and beside a brick interior wall, Elena and Ben stop after noticing an intimate moment at a nearby table that is hard to ignore in the crowded restaurant. Their discussion becomes a dispute as Elena presses the view that the behavior is inappropriate for the setting, while Ben insists that judgment is unwa... | {"Ben": "Respondent", "Elena": "Proponent"} | {"Ben": "Deception", "Elena": "Deception"} | {"Ben": "Competing", "Elena": "Competing"} | {"Ben": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "marketing professional"}, "Elena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "hospitality worker"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ben at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben should frame Ben's defense as if it follows a neutral reading of the situation while concealing any selective omissions or distortions that help Ben undermine Elena's criticism.", "Elena": "Elena should present her criticism as if it is grounded only in widely accepted restaurant norms while concealing any... | {"Ben": "Ben should pursue a self-prioritizing, non-conceding counter-position that rejects Elena's standard of appropriateness and pushes Ben's interpretation to prevail in the disagreement.", "Elena": "Elena should press a self-advantaging, non-conceding line that treats Elena's interpretation as the valid standard a... | {"Ben": "Ben should track Elena's agreement markers, hesitation, interruptions, reframing, stare direction, posture changes, or tension cues and answer by intensifying rebuttal when Elena shows uncertainty or shifting to firmer contradiction when Elena presses harder.", "Elena": "Elena should watch for Ben's interrupti... | {"Ben": "Ben and Elena should produce a dispute in which Ben's sustained defense, Elena's continued criticism, their direct contradictions and visible resistance cues, and Elena's eventual departure make observable that no shared judgment is reached and that Elena's critical interpretation does not prevail within the e... | {"Ben": {"belief": "The nearby intimate behavior does not warrant Elena's criticism in this social setting, and Elena is pressing a public judgment that he sees as unjustified.", "desire": "To secure acceptance of his defense of the behavior and prevent Elena's critical interpretation from prevailing in their exchange.... | images/scenario_010/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_010/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_010/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_20 | scenario_058 | high | Persuasion | 5 | Ethan; Mark; Clara; Mia; Sasha | In the group's corner, Ethan identifies the woman across the room as someone worth meeting, and the conversation turns into a direct dispute over whether approaching her is socially viable. Mark argues that Ethan has little chance, while Clara, Mia, and Sasha work to establish support for Ethan going over, leading Etha... | {"Clara": "Auxiliary", "Ethan": "Proponent", "Mark": "Respondent", "Mia": "Auxiliary", "Sasha": "Auxiliary"} | {"Clara": "Deception", "Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Mark": "Exaggeration", "Mia": "Suppression", "Sasha": "Deception"} | {"Clara": "Accommodating", "Ethan": "Competing", "Mark": "Competing", "Mia": "Accommodating", "Sasha": "Accommodating"} | {"Clara": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "restaurant manager"}, "Ethan": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "writer"}, "Mark": {"age": "30s", "charac... | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral", "Mark": "Neutral", "Mia": "Neutral", "Sasha": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Mark": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Mark at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Mia": "No clear facial aff... | {"Clara": "Clara must present confidence in Ethan's approach more strongly than Clara's actual certainty to counter Mark's influence and make support seem steadier than it is.", "Ethan": "Ethan must state plainly that approaching the woman is warranted and that Ethan will follow through, with direct wording and no hedg... | {"Clara": "Clara must prioritize group harmony by backing Ethan and countering Mark without escalating the dispute into a direct personal clash.", "Ethan": "Ethan must hold a self-prioritizing stance by rejecting dismissive assessments and positioning Ethan's approach as the decisive test of social viability.", "Mark":... | {"Clara": "Clara must monitor Mark's interruptions or dismissive reframing and Ethan's hesitation plus visible cues like tightened jaw, lowered gaze, or shifting stance, then insert supportive statements quickly when discouragement rises and phrase disagreement more gently when resistance hardens.", "Ethan": "Ethan mus... | {"Clara": "Clara's confident supportive framing, reinforced by Mia's and Sasha's backing and sustained against Mark's skepticism, results in the group's spoken and visible stance shifting toward supporting Ethan's approach and Ethan proceeding to the woman.", "Ethan": "Ethan's direct claim that the approach is warrante... | {"Clara": {"belief": "She believes Mark's skepticism is shaping the group discussion and that Ethan may need support to proceed.", "desire": "She wants the group to support Ethan's making the introduction rather than discourage him.", "intention": "She commits to countering Mark's position and reinforcing the view that... | images/scenario_058/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_058/individual/character_03.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_058/individual/character_01.jpg", "Mark": "images/scenario_058/individual/character_02.jpg", "Mia": "images/scenario_058/individual/character_04.jpg", "Sasha": "images/scenario_058/individual/character_05.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_21 | scenario_011 | high | Persuasion | 2 | Elena; Ben | At the edge of the seating area, Ben addresses Elena with a direct personal invitation, making clear that he wants the exchange understood as a proposal rather than casual conversation. When he starts to withdraw after stating it, Elena calls him back so the interaction stays centered on clarifying and answering what h... | {"Ben": "Proponent", "Elena": "Respondent"} | {"Ben": "Suppression", "Elena": "Exaggeration"} | {"Ben": "Competing", "Elena": "Competing"} | {"Ben": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "marketing executive"}, "Elena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "graphic designer"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ben at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben must use suppression by keeping Ben's wording restrained and selectively partial while still marking the invitation as more serious than ordinary conversation.", "Elena": "Elena must amplify the stakes and specificity of Ben's proposal in Elena's wording and visible insistence so the exchange cannot be rea... | {"Ben": "Ben must competitively resist any reframing of the invitation as casual by restating its personal significance and holding the exchange on securing a definite acknowledgment from Elena.", "Elena": "Elena must competitively hold the floor by directing Ben back to the proposal and pressing for explicit clarifica... | {"Ben": "Ben must monitor Elena's agreement, hesitation, reframing, posture changes, gaze direction, and tension cues, then adjust Ben's directness, timing, and emphasis to keep the proposal central without letting it dissolve into small talk.", "Elena": "Elena must track Ben's hesitation, interruptions, gaze shifts, a... | {"Ben": "Ben and Elena reach a definite acknowledgment of Ben's invitation as a serious personal proposal, with Ben's restrained restatement and resistance to casual reframing keeping the dialogue centered on the proposal until Elena gives a clear response.", "Elena": "Elena and Ben reach a publicly clear exchange in w... | {"Ben": {"belief": "He has presented Elena with a direct invitation that is socially distinct from ordinary conversation, and his initial retreat risks leaving the proposal exposed without a clear response.", "desire": "To have his invitation treated as a serious personal proposal and obtain a definite acknowledgment f... | images/scenario_011/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_011/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_011/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_22 | scenario_074 | high | Eristic | 5 | Elena; Ethan; Daniel; Clara; Ava | Elena presents the freshly cleaned living area for the others' evaluation, but Clara's notice that an ottoman has been moved quickly turns the conversation into a dispute over whose standard of order should count. Ethan, Daniel, Ava, and Clara then trade pointed mockery about cleanliness, organization, and domestic hab... | {"Ava": "Quarreller", "Clara": "Quarreller", "Daniel": "Quarreller", "Elena": "Auxiliary", "Ethan": "Quarreller"} | {"Ava": "Exaggeration", "Clara": "Deception", "Daniel": "Suppression", "Elena": "Strategic Withholding", "Ethan": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ava": "Competing", "Clara": "Competing", "Daniel": "Competing", "Elena": "Accommodating", "Ethan": "Competing"} | {"Ava": {"age": "20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Massage Therapist"}, "Clara": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Chef"}, "Daniel": {"age": "30s", "characteristics... | {"Ava": "Neutral", "Clara": "Neutral", "Daniel": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral"} | {"Ava": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ava at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Daniel": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Daniel at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial a... | {"Ava": "Ava should amplify contrasts between acceptable and unacceptable domestic habits so Ava's criticisms sound weighty and dominant in the discussion.", "Clara": "Clara should present the ottoman as evidence that the room is not truly organized in a way that guides others toward Clara's preferred conclusion withou... | {"Ava": "Ava should compete by making Ava's judgments the strongest reference point for evaluating cleanliness and organization in the shared room.", "Clara": "Clara should use the ottoman dispute to seize definitional control over what counts as proper arrangement and undermine competing standards in the exchange.", "... | {"Ava": "Ava should track mockery, overlap, hesitation, eye rolls, posture shifts, and gaze aversion, then increase intensity when others yield attention and scale claims back slightly when disbelief becomes too visible.", "Clara": "Clara should read interruptions, quick agreement, skeptical pauses, gaze toward the ott... | {"Ava": "Ava should drive the interaction to a state where Ethan, Daniel, or Clara answer Ava's intensified contrasts about acceptable versus unacceptable domestic habits and treat Ava's criticisms as a standard they must contest or accommodate, as shown through direct counters, mocking uptake, and visible signs of yie... | {"Ava": {"belief": "She believes the exchange has become a competitive argument about domestic habits rather than a simple reaction to the cleaned room.", "desire": "She wants her criticisms of others' cleanliness and organization to carry social weight in the group.", "intention": "She forms the intention to intensify... | images/scenario_074/group_labeled.png | {"Ava": "images/scenario_074/individual/character_05.jpg", "Clara": "images/scenario_074/individual/character_04.jpg", "Daniel": "images/scenario_074/individual/character_03.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_074/individual/character_01.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_074/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_23 | scenario_012 | high | Information-seeking | 2 | Elena; Leo | Near the doorway by the living area, Elena pauses with a paper in hand when Leo asks to borrow moisturizer for an upcoming occasion. She asks what it is for before deciding, and after his brief explanation she directs him to the bathroom and permits him to use the moisturizer available there. | {"Elena": "Questioner", "Leo": "Answerer"} | {"Elena": "Deception", "Leo": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Elena": "Competing", "Leo": "Competing"} | {"Elena": {"age": "28", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Freelance Writer"}, "Leo": {"age": "29", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Actor"}} | {"Elena": "Neutral", "Leo": "Neutral"} | {"Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Leo": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Leo at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Elena": "Elena should use deceptive phrasing that presents the permission check as routine while concealing that the real aim is to test whether Leo's reason justifies controlled access to the moisturizer.", "Leo": "Leo should use strategic withholding by giving a concise reason for the upcoming occasion while omitti... | {"Elena": "Elena should maintain a competing stance by requiring Leo to provide a brief explanation before granting only limited access to the bathroom moisturizer on Elena's terms.", "Leo": "Leo should maintain a competing stance by pushing for quick approval with the minimum explanation needed to secure access withou... | {"Elena": "Elena should watch for Leo's hesitation, interruption, brevity, gaze shifts, or posture tightening and respond by sharpening the question, delaying permission, or narrowing the allowed use until Leo's answer meets Elena's standard.", "Leo": "Leo should monitor Elena's follow-up questions, pauses, reframing, ... | {"Elena": "Elena secures an exchange in which Leo gives a brief justification, Elena frames the check as routine while limiting access to the bathroom moisturizer, and both participants' words and visible compliance establish that permission was granted on Elena's terms.", "Leo": "Leo obtains Elena's permission to use ... | {"Elena": {"belief": "Leo needs moisturizer right away for an upcoming occasion and is asking because he does not have direct access to it without her approval.", "desire": "To determine whether Leo's request is justified and keep control over access to the apartment's personal-care items.", "intention": "To require a ... | images/scenario_012/group_labeled.png | {"Elena": "images/scenario_012/individual/character_01.jpg", "Leo": "images/scenario_012/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_24 | scenario_013 | high | Information-seeking | 2 | Ethan; Clara | In the shared apartment's common area near the kitchen, Ethan asks Clara where the person connected to the phone call is, and Clara says he is in the bathroom while making clear that interrupting him would be inappropriate. Ethan treats direct delivery of the message as the solution, but the immediate outcome shows tha... | {"Clara": "Answerer", "Ethan": "Questioner"} | {"Clara": "Suppression", "Ethan": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Clara": "Competing", "Ethan": "Competing"} | {"Clara": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "graphic designer"}, "Ethan": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "marketing associate"}} | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must name the person's location while keeping the privacy rationale indirect so Clara signals a boundary without fully spelling out the absent person's situation.", "Ethan": "Ethan must state openly that Ethan wants the message delivered directly and speak as if Clara's warning does not change Ethan's ... | {"Clara": "Clara must hold the line against interruption by framing Clara's warning as a clear limit and not yielding control of the boundary to Ethan's urgency.", "Ethan": "Ethan must press for immediate direct delivery over Clara's limiting cue by positioning Ethan's own judgment as the deciding basis for action."} | {"Clara": "Clara must monitor Ethan's agreement, pushback, interruptions, movement toward the bathroom, gaze shifts, and posture changes and then tighten wording, timing, or physical positioning to reinforce that direct interruption is not acceptable.", "Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Clara's hesitation, interruption, f... | {"Clara": "Clara establishes an observable interaction result in which Clara's location-plus-warning is reinforced through firmer wording or blocking behavior and Ethan's continued push for direct delivery is checked, making clear across both participants that interruption of the person in the bathroom is not acceptabl... | {"Clara": {"belief": "The intended recipient is in the bathroom, Ethan does not yet understand why interruption would be inappropriate, and her warning should be sufficient to signal that he should not enter.", "desire": "To preserve the absent person's privacy while still giving Ethan enough information to understand ... | images/scenario_013/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_013/individual/character_02.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_013/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_25 | scenario_014 | high | Persuasion | 2 | Clara; Daniel | In a private corner near the doorway of a college residence room, Daniel confronts Clara as their casual encounter turns into a direct dispute over whether their relationship will be exclusive. Clara holds to the understanding that their arrangement permits other romantic ties, while Daniel insists that they should con... | {"Clara": "Respondent", "Daniel": "Proponent"} | {"Clara": "Deception", "Daniel": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Clara": "Competing", "Daniel": "Competing"} | {"Clara": {"age": "26", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "college student"}, "Daniel": {"age": "27", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "college student"}} | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Daniel": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Daniel": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Daniel at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must use deceptive wording or selective framing to make the nonexclusive arrangement sound already settled while avoiding any clear verbal concession to exclusivity.", "Daniel": "Daniel must state plainly and consistently that Daniel wants the relationship to continue only on an exclusive basis, withou... | {"Clara": "Clara must competitively hold the interaction on Clara's interpretation of the relationship by rejecting Daniel's proposed change and prioritizing Clara's terms over preserving agreement.", "Daniel": "Daniel must competitively press for Clara's acknowledgment of a changed exclusive status by centering Daniel... | {"Clara": "Clara must track Daniel's direct assertions, interruptions, pauses, gaze, and posture near the doorway, then increase ambiguity or shift framing when Daniel presses and restate Clara's position when Daniel shows hesitation.", "Daniel": "Daniel must monitor Clara's agreement, reframing, evasive phrasing, gaze... | {"Clara": "Clara leaves the exchange with Daniel still verbally contesting exclusivity but without any mutual statement establishing an exclusive relationship, as shown by Clara's selective framing, Daniel's continued objections, and both participants' observable monitoring of pauses, gaze, and posture near the doorway... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Clara believes Daniel is trying to redefine their relationship as exclusive in this conversation, while she understands their current arrangement to allow other romantic ties.", "desire": "Clara wants the current nonexclusive understanding between them to remain in place without conceding Daniel's... | images/scenario_014/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_014/individual/character_01.jpg", "Daniel": "images/scenario_014/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_26 | scenario_075 | high | Deliberation | 2 | Ethan; Lila | Late in the evening in a private bedroom, Ethan and Lila focus on whether their difficult relationship should continue, with Lila pressing for a clear decision and Ethan acknowledging that his choice is to leave rather than stay ambiguously involved. A brief affectionate exchange at the end highlights the tension betwe... | {"Ethan": "Deliberator", "Lila": "Deliberator"} | {"Ethan": "Exaggeration", "Lila": "Suppression"} | {"Ethan": "Competing", "Lila": "Competing"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "mid-20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "software developer"}, "Lila": {"age": "mid-20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "graphic designer"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must state that leaving is the only workable outcome and amplify how continuing would worsen complications so Ethan does not appear to preserve ambiguity.", "Lila": "Lila must press for a direct yes-or-no decision while keeping Lila's own attachment cues and preferred outcome understated so the exchang... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must hold a firm self-prioritizing position by repeating the decision to leave without offering relational concessions that would blur Ethan's stated preference.", "Lila": "Lila must maintain a competitive demand for explicit terms by challenging vague phrasing and requiring Ethan to commit to a defini... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Lila's interruptions, hesitation, gaze holding, or posture tightening and then sharpen or slow Ethan's wording to restate the decision without reopening unclear involvement.", "Lila": "Lila must track Ethan's reframing, pauses, softened tone, affectionate gestures, or gaze shifts and res... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Lila reach a jointly evidenced outcome in which Ethan explicitly states that Ethan is leaving, Lila treats that statement as the relationship decision, and both participants' words and closing behavior show that affectionate contact does not reopen ambiguity.", "Lila": "Lila and Ethan arrive at an ... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "He believes the relationship has become difficult enough that continuing it would deepen complications, and he understands that Lila is asking him to state a definite position.", "desire": "He wants the relationship status to be clarified in a way that reflects his stated preference to step away r... | images/scenario_075/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_075/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_075/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_27 | scenario_059 | high | Eristic | 3 | Elena; Lila; Ethan | As the evening winds down in the shared apartment living area, Elena heads off toward her room after leaving her shoes behind, and Lila treats the shoes as a legitimate shared-space issue instead of letting it go. With others still lingering nearby, the exchange turns into a petty dispute over whether the lapse deserve... | {"Elena": "Quarreller", "Ethan": "Auxiliary", "Lila": "Quarreller"} | {"Elena": "Honest Signaling", "Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Lila": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Elena": "Competing", "Ethan": "Accommodating", "Lila": "Competing"} | {"Elena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "restaurant manager"}, "Ethan": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "university lecturer"}... | {"Elena": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Elena": "Elena must state directly that the shoes are a minor lapse and not valid grounds for public criticism, without softening or obscuring that position.", "Ethan": "Ethan must state openly that the dispute is not worth more attention and signal closure without hiding Ethan's assessment of the exchange.", "Lila":... | {"Elena": "Elena must actively reject Lila's framing and defend Elena's standing by challenging the legitimacy of treating the shoes as a meaningful shared-space offense.", "Ethan": "Ethan must position Ethan as accommodating by prioritizing ending the dispute over proving either side right and by offering a closing fr... | {"Elena": "Elena must watch for Lila's interruptions, insistence, narrowed gaze, or rigid posture and respond by tightening Elena's wording, speaking sooner, or repeating the insignificance frame before others align with Lila.", "Ethan": "Ethan must track ongoing interruption, hesitation to disengage, tense posture, or... | {"Elena": "Elena, after directly rejecting Lila's criticism and visibly holding position through tightened wording or quick repetition, reaches an exchange outcome in which Ethan's closing remark is accepted by the others and the shoes are left treated in dialogue as not worth further public criticism.", "Ethan": "Etha... | {"Elena": {"belief": "Elena believes that Lila is using the shoes left in the living area to criticize her rather than treating it as a minor issue.", "desire": "Elena wants the situation to be treated as insignificant and not to become a basis for social criticism of her in front of the others.", "intention": "Elena i... | images/scenario_059/group_labeled.png | {"Elena": "images/scenario_059/individual/character_01.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_059/individual/character_03.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_059/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_28 | scenario_015 | high | Persuasion | 2 | Clara; Ethan | Within the larger gathering, Clara and Ethan sustain a focused exchange near the low table about whether lasting love depends on intense passion. Clara keeps the question open as a challenge to Ethan's view, while Ethan presses the claim that other forms of connection matter more and redirects the discussion toward how... | {"Clara": "Respondent", "Ethan": "Proponent"} | {"Clara": "Suppression", "Ethan": "Exaggeration"} | {"Clara": "Competing", "Ethan": "Competing"} | {"Clara": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "urban professional"}, "Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "urban professional"}} | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must keep her full stance partially unstated by posing concise challenges to Ethan's standard for lasting love while avoiding direct disclosure that would let Ethan define Clara's romantic future on his terms.", "Ethan": "Ethan must exaggerate the adequacy of non-passionate forms of connection in dialo... | {"Clara": "Clara must compete for interpretive control by repeatedly re-centering the exchange on whether enduring love requires sustained passion and resisting Ethan's attempt to establish a broader standard as the default.", "Ethan": "Ethan must compete by asserting his broader definition of enduring love as the stro... | {"Clara": "Clara must watch for Ethan's interruptions, reframing, steady gaze, forward posture, or tension cues and respond by tightening the question, delaying concessions, or explicitly redirecting the topic back to the core challenge.", "Ethan": "Ethan must track Clara's hesitation, counterquestions, interruptions, ... | {"Clara": "Clara and Ethan end the exchange with Clara's question about sustained passion still explicitly unanswered as the controlling issue, while Ethan's dialogue links love to broader qualities but does not secure Clara's agreement that Clara's romantic future should be defined by Ethan's standard.", "Ethan": "Eth... | {"Clara": {"belief": "She believes the conversation has shifted into a direct evaluation of whether enduring love requires sustained passion and that Ethan is positioning a different standard for long-term relationships while inviting her to apply it to her own situation.", "desire": "She wants the discussion to preser... | images/scenario_015/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_015/individual/character_01.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_015/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_29 | scenario_016 | high | Deliberation | 2 | Ethan; Ben | In the shared apartment’s kitchen area, Ben raises the option of backing Ethan up before Ethan steps out to a nearby balcony or adjoining outdoor space for a private conversation. Ethan makes clear that he will handle it alone, and their brief exchange becomes an agreement about Ben staying uninvolved while Ethan direc... | {"Ben": "Deliberator", "Ethan": "Deliberator"} | {"Ben": "Strategic Withholding", "Ethan": "Deception"} | {"Ben": "Competing", "Ethan": "Competing"} | {"Ben": {"age": "20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "college student"}, "Ethan": {"age": "20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "college student"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ben at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben should offer support as a limited option while withholding how strongly Ben thinks involvement could matter unless Ethan invites more input.", "Ethan": "Ethan should state that Ethan has it covered while concealing any uncertainty about handling the private conversation alone."} | {"Ben": "Ben should frame the offer in a self-protective way that preserves Ben's relevance without committing Ben to join unless Ethan accepts.", "Ethan": "Ethan should push for a brief, one-sided agreement that Ben stays uninvolved so Ethan retains control over the next step."} | {"Ben": "Ben should monitor Ethan's refusal, reframing, clipped replies, gaze aversion, or movement toward the balcony and then reduce pressure, narrow the offer, or withdraw the proposal once Ethan signals a firm boundary.", "Ethan": "Ethan should watch for Ben's hesitation, interruption, narrowed gaze, or posture shi... | {"Ben": "Ben and Ethan establish through brief dialogue that Ben's support remains only an offered option that Ethan declines, with Ben withdrawing the proposal and Ethan's response or movement confirming a clear division in which Ben stays out of the private conversation.", "Ethan": "Ethan and Ben reach an explicit, o... | {"Ben": {"belief": "Ethan is about to handle a private conversation elsewhere in the apartment, and Ben believes his support could be relevant even if Ethan may decline it.", "desire": "To clarify whether he will be involved or remain out of the interaction so the division of roles is understood.", "intention": "To pre... | images/scenario_016/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_016/individual/character_02.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_016/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_30 | scenario_017 | high | Information-seeking | 2 | Elena; Ben | At the bank counter, Ben starts choking as he tries to respond, making his condition unclear in front of the gathered customers. Elena immediately intervenes and, once the obstruction is cleared, presses for a clear confirmation from Ben that he is alright as he regains enough breath to answer. | {"Ben": "Answerer", "Elena": "Questioner"} | {"Ben": "Honest Signaling", "Elena": "Exaggeration"} | {"Ben": "Competing", "Elena": "Competing"} | {"Ben": {"age": "adult", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "bank customer"}, "Elena": {"age": "adult", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "bank customer"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben must state his condition plainly and accurately in direct words, without minimization or embellishment, as soon as Ben can speak clearly enough to be understood.", "Elena": "Elena must use emphatic wording and conspicuous directing gestures to amplify the urgency of obtaining Ben's clear verbal confirmatio... | {"Ben": "Ben must assert control over how Ben is perceived by giving a concise definitive confirmation of whether Ben is alright and not allowing the exchange to remain ambiguous.", "Elena": "Elena must take control of the exchange by setting the topic, pressing for a direct yes-or-no confirmation from Ben, and priorit... | {"Ben": "Ben must monitor Elena's interruptions, repeated prompts, and nearby customers' fixed gaze or posture shifts and then respond by increasing clarity, shortening the reply, or repeating the confirmation until others stop signaling uncertainty.", "Elena": "Elena must watch for Ben's hesitation, interrupted speech... | {"Ben": "Ben produces a publicly accepted resolution of Ben's condition when Ben's plain, definitive confirmation that Ben is alright answers Elena's forceful prompts clearly enough that Elena stops pressing and the gathered customers no longer display uncertainty.", "Elena": "Elena secures a publicly recognizable clos... | {"Ben": {"belief": "He has just experienced choking in a public bank setting and others are relying on his confirmation to determine whether he is alright.", "desire": "To communicate his current condition clearly so the situation is recognized as under control.", "intention": "To provide a direct confirmation about hi... | images/scenario_017/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_017/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_017/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_31 | scenario_018 | high | Deliberation | 4 | Ethan; Jade; Clara; Daniel | In the main sitting area, the friends pause around the seating space to decide how a former partner’s already-issued invitation affects the agreement they had made about whom to include or avoid at New Year’s. Their discussion focuses on whether to treat the original pact as still binding, revise it explicitly, or find... | {"Clara": "Deliberator", "Daniel": "Deliberator", "Ethan": "Deliberator", "Jade": "Auxiliary"} | {"Clara": "Honest Signaling", "Daniel": "Honest Signaling", "Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Jade": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Clara": "Competing", "Daniel": "Competing", "Ethan": "Competing", "Jade": "Accommodating"} | {"Clara": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Restaurant manager"}, "Daniel": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "University professor"}, "E... | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Daniel": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral", "Jade": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Daniel": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Daniel at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Jade": "No clear facia... | {"Clara": "Clara must state plainly that letting the exception stand without a decision undermines the earlier pact and that Clara wants the agreement treated as binding unless openly revised.", "Daniel": "Daniel must say clearly that the invitation has created a conflict between the previous pact and the current guest... | {"Clara": "Clara must argue assertively for reaffirming the pact as governing the guest list and challenge any move that treats the agreement as casually overridable.", "Daniel": "Daniel must push the group to choose between enforcing the original pact and formally changing it for this case so the plan is settled on cl... | {"Clara": "Clara must track agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframing, squared posture, gaze withdrawal, or tension cues, and then intensify Clara’s insistence on a decision or briefly pause to restate that only an open revision can change the pact.", "Daniel": "Daniel must observe agreement, hesitation, interrupt... | {"Clara": "Clara obtains explicit support from at least one of Ethan or Daniel, with Jade addressing the terms of the exception, that the prior pact remains binding unless the group openly revises it.", "Daniel": "Daniel gets Ethan, Jade, and Clara to articulate a clear either-or group ruling that the original pact is ... | {"Clara": {"belief": "The earlier pact was meant to guide invitations, and allowing this exception without a decision would undermine what the group had agreed.", "desire": "To reaffirm that the group’s prior agreement should still govern the New Year’s guest list.", "intention": "To argue for a decision that treats th... | images/scenario_018/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_018/individual/character_03.jpg", "Daniel": "images/scenario_018/individual/character_04.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_018/individual/character_01.jpg", "Jade": "images/scenario_018/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_32 | scenario_060 | high | Eristic | 2 | Ethan; Liam | At the holiday gathering, Ethan's late arrival in a festive outfit with jingling shoes draws the room's attention and becomes a public contest over how the entrance will be socially defined. Liam answers with exaggerated ridicule to impose his framing, while Ethan responds by highlighting the bells so the exchange beco... | {"Ethan": "Quarreller", "Liam": "Quarreller"} | {"Ethan": "Suppression", "Liam": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ethan": "Competing", "Liam": "Competing"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "actor"}, "Liam": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "actor"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Liam": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Liam": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must keep direct acknowledgment of vulnerability or concession out of speech while selectively highlighting the bells and outfit in controlled, ambiguous phrasing that redirects meaning toward advantage.", "Liam": "Liam must openly state a ridiculing interpretation of Ethan's entrance in clear exaggera... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must contest Liam's framing by asserting a counter-definition of the entrance that centers Ethan's own terms and resists any lowering of standing.", "Liam": "Liam must pursue control of the exchange by pressing Liam's own framing over Ethan's counter-moves and treating the moment as a contest for conve... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Liam's interruptions, the group's hesitation or laughter, and cues like fixed gaze, posture shifts, or tension, then adjust reply speed, emphasis on the bells, and sharpness of framing to keep the exchange from settling under Liam's definition.", "Liam": "Liam must track Ethan's reframin... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must bring the exchange with Liam to an observable state where Ethan's remarks about the bells and outfit force Liam to answer on Ethan's terms and the room's dialogue, hesitation, laughter, gaze shifts, or posture changes no longer support Liam's original ridiculing definition as the settled reading o... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Liam's ridicule has made Ethan's entrance a public contest for standing in front of the group.", "desire": "Ethan wants the room to read his late entrance and festive outfit as socially winning rather than as something Liam can define through mockery.", "intention": "Ethan commits to reframing the... | images/scenario_060/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_060/individual/character_01.jpg", "Liam": "images/scenario_060/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_33 | scenario_019 | high | Persuasion | 2 | Ethan; Lila | In a quiet corner of the science building near the board and work surfaces, Ethan responds after writing out an answer that makes his position harder to leave implicit. The discussion shifts from theoretical physics to a contest over whether his stated standard for the right moment still justifies delay or whether Lila... | {"Ethan": "Proponent", "Lila": "Respondent"} | {"Ethan": "Strategic Withholding", "Lila": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ethan": "Competing", "Lila": "Competing"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "physicist"}, "Lila": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "physics student"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must answer by emphasizing standards and justification while omitting any direct present acknowledgment that would fix his position explicitly now.", "Lila": "Lila must state plainly that Ethan's written answer already makes Ethan's position clear and that further delay counts as avoidance rather than ... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must compete for control of the exchange by redirecting Lila's challenge toward whether the criteria for explicit acknowledgment have been met rather than accepting Lila's timing.", "Lila": "Lila must compete by pressing Ethan to match Ethan's stated standard with immediate explicit acknowledgment and ... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Lila's interruptions, reframing, sustained gaze, or forward posture and respond by tightening definitions, slowing commitment, or repeating procedural standards when pressure increases.", "Lila": "Lila must monitor Ethan's hedging, topic shifts, pauses, gaze withdrawal, or tension at the... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Lila must arrive at a visible standoff in which Ethan keeps the exchange centered on whether procedural standards for explicit acknowledgment have been met while Lila explicitly states that Ethan's written answer already meets that standard, with the conflict evidenced by Ethan's repeated qualifica... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Lila is no longer treating the exchange as only a theoretical discussion and is pressing him to make his position explicit in the present scene.", "desire": "To preserve his ability to set the terms and timing of what he will openly acknowledge or commit to.", "intention": "To answer in a way that... | images/scenario_019/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_019/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_019/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_34 | scenario_020 | high | Deliberation | 2 | Ethan; Lena | At the crowded lab worktable, Ethan and Lena briefly negotiate which tools and documents should be moved so the surface can be cleared for their immediate interaction while preserving an orderly, professional appearance. Their exchange stays focused on shared justification and control over the rearrangement as they coo... | {"Ethan": "Deliberator", "Lena": "Deliberator"} | {"Ethan": "Deception", "Lena": "Deception"} | {"Ethan": "Competing", "Lena": "Competing"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Research Scientist"}, "Lena": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Lab Technician"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Lena": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lena at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must present selected items as the most justified to move first while omitting any self-serving preference in order to make Ethan's guidance appear purely orderly and necessary.", "Lena": "Lena must describe Lena's preferred limits on what gets moved as if those limits are only required by bench order ... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must push for Ethan's preferred sequence of rearrangement as the controlling plan and resist Lena's competing proposals unless accepting them better protects Ethan from appearing careless or manipulative.", "Lena": "Lena must contest Ethan's attempts to dominate the rearrangement by asserting Lena's ow... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must watch Lena's agreement, hesitation, interruption, gaze shifts, and posture changes, then tighten justification, soften wording, or pause and reframe the proposed moves to keep control without triggering suspicion.", "Lena": "Lena must monitor Ethan's agreement, hesitation, reframing, interruptions... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Lena visibly arrive at a shared verbal agreement on which specific tools and documents will be moved first, with Ethan's justification shaping the accepted sequence while Lena's responses, gaze, and compliance show the arrangement is treated as orderly rather than careless or manipulative.", "Lena"... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "The lab bench is currently too crowded for their immediate interaction, and Lena is participating in deciding what should be moved first.", "desire": "To establish a workable shared understanding of how the surface should be cleared so the interaction can proceed without disrupting the professiona... | images/scenario_020/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_020/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lena": "images/scenario_020/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_35 | scenario_021 | high | Deliberation | 2 | Elena; Ben | In the shared room, Elena pushes for an immediate decision about the evening and Ben agrees that they will remain there together instead of moving on to other plans. As the common-area table and the belongings on it become part of that coordination, the conversation shifts from organizing the shared space to defining t... | {"Ben": "Deliberator", "Elena": "Deliberator"} | {"Ben": "Strategic Withholding", "Elena": "Exaggeration"} | {"Ben": "Competing", "Elena": "Competing"} | {"Ben": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "graphic designer"}, "Elena": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "freelance writer"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben must signal commitment to staying with Elena while withholding any mention of other possible plans or reservations that could weaken the shared decision.", "Elena": "Elena must overstate the immediacy and importance of deciding now to stay together in the room so Ben's agreement appears like the obvious ne... | {"Ben": "Ben must pursue a self-protective accepting stance by agreeing to remain there on terms that preserve Ben's control over how the evening is organized around that choice.", "Elena": "Elena must take a dominant line by framing staying together there as the decision point and pressing Ben to confirm it without op... | {"Ben": "Ben must track Elena's reframing, insistence, interruptions, facial tension, and orientation toward the table or room and respond by confirming the stay more clearly when Elena presses or by limiting details when Elena seeks broader commitment.", "Elena": "Elena must watch for Ben's agreement, hesitation, inte... | {"Ben": "Ben and Elena reach a mutually ratified outcome in which Ben clearly states that Ben will remain there with Elena and both participants, through narrowed discussion of the table and belongings plus observable alignment in gaze or posture, treat the evening as continuing together in that room without reference ... | {"Ben": {"belief": "Elena wants a clear decision to remain there together, and his response will signal whether he prioritizes that shared time over other possible plans.", "desire": "To maintain the interaction on mutually agreeable terms while accepting the decision to stay in the shared space with Elena.", "intentio... | images/scenario_021/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_021/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_021/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_36 | scenario_061 | high | Eristic | 2 | Elena; Clara | In the quiet hospital room, Elena and Clara use the private bedside conversation to compete over whose account of the resting man will carry more weight. Their exchange sharpens into a contest for credibility and standing, with each positioning her claims against the other's in the silence around the bed. | {"Clara": "Quarreller", "Elena": "Quarreller"} | {"Clara": "Suppression", "Elena": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Clara": "Competing", "Elena": "Competing"} | {"Clara": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "artist"}, "Elena": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "writer"}} | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must keep Clara's stance strategically restrained by implying limits in Elena's account and withholding full commitment until Clara can counter without letting Elena's version appear uncontested.", "Elena": "Elena must state her account of the man in clear, specific terms without hedging so Elena's dia... | {"Clara": "Clara must maintain a competing position by countering Elena's claims in ways that block Elena's superiority and preserve Clara's standing as an equally strong interpreter.", "Elena": "Elena must keep positioning Elena's claims as the stronger account by directly challenging Clara's competing interpretation ... | {"Clara": "Clara must monitor Elena for agreement, insistence, interruption, reframing, fixed gaze, posture shifts, or tension cues, and Clara must adjust Clara's timing, ambiguity, or counterframing to keep influence from consolidating around Elena's version.", "Elena": "Elena must watch Clara for hesitation, interrup... | {"Clara": "Clara brings the bedside exchange to a point where Elena must answer Clara's restrained counterpositioning with renewed justification, sharper evidence, or corrective challenge, leaving both participants' dialogue and behavior to show that Elena's version has not secured uncontested control over the credibil... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Elena is using the quiet bedside conversation to establish superiority through increasingly bold claims about the man, making the exchange a direct rivalry.", "desire": "To prevent Elena's version from controlling the exchange and to preserve her own standing as an equally strong interpreter of th... | images/scenario_061/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_061/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_061/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_37 | scenario_022 | high | Persuasion | 3 | Ethan; Benjamin; Miles | In the apartment's kitchen-living area, Benjamin insists the boundary breach was only a drunken mistake and denies that anything more happened, while Ethan openly treats the matter as concealed and inadequate explained. As Ethan directly challenges both Benjamin and Miles over what was kept from him, the gathering shif... | {"Benjamin": "Proponent", "Ethan": "Respondent", "Miles": "Auxiliary"} | {"Benjamin": "Deception", "Ethan": "Strategic Withholding", "Miles": "Deception"} | {"Benjamin": "Competing", "Ethan": "Competing", "Miles": "Accommodating"} | {"Benjamin": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "university professor"}, "Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "corporate employee"}, "Mil... | {"Benjamin": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Surprise", "Miles": "Neutral"} | {"Benjamin": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Benjamin at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "Ethan displays visible shock upon learning that Benjamin kissed Ethan's mom.", "Miles": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Miles at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Benjamin": "Benjamin must use deception to present the breach as only a drunken mistake and deny any further concealment in ways that make Ethan's accusations seem unsupported.", "Ethan": "Ethan must press for specifics about what was concealed while strategically withholding any sign that Benjamin's minimizing accou... | {"Benjamin": "Benjamin must hold a competing position by defending Benjamin's minimizing account, resisting added scrutiny, and steering the exchange toward acceptance of limited responsibility.", "Ethan": "Ethan must sustain a competing stance by directly contesting Benjamin's framing and demanding that Benjamin and M... | {"Benjamin": "Benjamin must monitor Ethan's direct challenges, Miles's wavering, interruptions, fixed gaze, or tension cues and adjust by repeating denials, narrowing claims, or speaking sooner to keep control of the account.", "Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Benjamin's denials, Miles's hesitations, interruptions, gaze ... | {"Benjamin": "Benjamin's repeated denials and narrowing claims lead to a visible alignment from Miles and a contested but explicit exchange with Ethan in which Benjamin's limited-incident account is stated and defended by more than one participant as the operative version under dispute.", "Ethan": "Ethan's direct chall... | {"Benjamin": {"belief": "Ethan sees his explanation as inadequate and is treating the issue as a serious violation involving concealment.", "desire": "To have his account accepted as a limited incident that does not justify further blame or scrutiny.", "intention": "To maintain a minimizing explanation and deny that an... | images/scenario_022/group_labeled.png | {"Benjamin": "images/scenario_022/individual/character_02.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_022/individual/character_01.jpg", "Miles": "images/scenario_022/individual/character_03.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_38 | scenario_062 | high | Eristic | 3 | Ethan; Lila; Clara | At Ethan's bedside in the decorated recovery room, Lila and Clara reject his flat parting words as an insufficient acknowledgment of the effort and promises they connect to his return to ordinary life. What should be a brief goodbye turns into a tight confrontation beside the bed and tray table, as Ethan tries to let t... | {"Clara": "Quarreller", "Ethan": "Quarreller", "Lila": "Quarreller"} | {"Clara": "Suppression", "Ethan": "Suppression", "Lila": "Suppression"} | {"Clara": "Competing", "Ethan": "Competing", "Lila": "Competing"} | {"Clara": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Event Coordinator"}, "Ethan": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Student"}, "Lila": {"age": "youn... | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must back the claim that Ethan's wording sidesteps accountability while withholding any signal that the current goodbye can stand, using concise corrective statements and a steady, unsmiling presentation.", "Ethan": "Ethan must keep responses brief and noncommittal while avoiding direct acknowledgment ... | {"Clara": "Clara must reinforce pressure on Ethan by disputing his minimal account and aligning with Lila's challenge until a clearer acknowledgment or reciprocal regard is voiced.", "Ethan": "Ethan must push for closure on his terms by repeating that his goodbye is sufficient and refusing conversational ground that le... | {"Clara": "Clara must watch for Ethan's reframing, cutoff attempts, glances toward ending the exchange, or guarded posture as well as Lila's openings, and adjust by entering promptly, sharpening the frame, or sustaining the challenge before Ethan exits.", "Ethan": "Ethan must track Lila's and Clara's interruptions, ref... | {"Clara": "Clara helps produce an interaction outcome in which Ethan cannot end the bedside exchange on minimal terms and instead must respond to a jointly sustained challenge from Clara and Lila with clearer acknowledgment or reciprocal regard, evidenced by Clara's concise corrections, Lila's continued pressure, and E... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Ethan is trying to end the interaction with wording that sidesteps the return expected for others' effort and prior commitments.", "desire": "To establish that Ethan cannot close the exchange without giving clearer acknowledgment and reciprocal regard.", "intention": "To challenge Ethan's attempt ... | images/scenario_062/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_062/individual/character_03.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_062/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_062/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_39 | scenario_023 | high | Information-seeking | 3 | Eleanor Vance; Daniel Reed; Benjamin Carter | Near one apartment entrance, Eleanor Vance briefly checks on Daniel Reed and receives a concise reply that keeps the exchange limited as she continues down the hall. A short distance away, Benjamin Carter acknowledges her with a polite greeting as she passes, maintaining the corridor's casual neighborly etiquette. | {"Benjamin Carter": "Auxiliary", "Daniel Reed": "Answerer", "Eleanor Vance": "Questioner"} | {"Benjamin Carter": "Strategic Withholding", "Daniel Reed": "Strategic Withholding", "Eleanor Vance": "Exaggeration"} | {"Benjamin Carter": "Accommodating", "Daniel Reed": "Competing", "Eleanor Vance": "Competing"} | {"Benjamin Carter": {"age": "middle-aged", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "professor"}, "Daniel Reed": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "of... | {"Benjamin Carter": "Neutral", "Daniel Reed": "Neutral", "Eleanor Vance": "Neutral"} | {"Benjamin Carter": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Benjamin Carter at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Daniel Reed": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Daniel Reed at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Eleanor Vance": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Eleanor Vance at the beginn... | {"Benjamin Carter": "Benjamin Carter should offer a polite greeting that acknowledges Eleanor's passing presence without adding information that could interrupt the limited corridor exchange.", "Daniel Reed": "Daniel Reed should give a true but minimal acknowledgment that answers Eleanor without volunteering extra deta... | {"Benjamin Carter": "Benjamin Carter should accommodate the existing flow by yielding space and keeping acknowledgment brief so courteous recognition occurs without competing for attention.", "Daniel Reed": "Daniel Reed should prioritize closing the interaction quickly by delivering a concise reply that satisfies the i... | {"Benjamin Carter": "Benjamin Carter should track whether Eleanor maintains motion, slows, or redirects gaze and whether Daniel interrupts or remains closed off, then adjust greeting timing, volume, and brevity to fit the passing interaction without creating pressure for reply.", "Daniel Reed": "Daniel Reed should moni... | {"Benjamin Carter": "Benjamin Carter and Eleanor Vance complete a short polite greeting after Eleanor Vance's brief exchange with Daniel Reed, and the timing and brevity of all three participants' responses make the corridor etiquette observably remain smooth and nonintrusive.", "Daniel Reed": "Daniel Reed gives Eleano... | {"Benjamin Carter": {"belief": "Eleanor is moving past after a brief exchange with Daniel, and a simple acknowledgment fits the shared hallway setting.", "desire": "To preserve courteous neighborly recognition without interrupting the existing flow of passing interactions.", "intention": "To offer a polite greeting tha... | images/scenario_023/group_labeled.png | {"Benjamin Carter": "images/scenario_023/individual/character_03.jpg", "Daniel Reed": "images/scenario_023/individual/character_02.jpg", "Eleanor Vance": "images/scenario_023/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_40 | scenario_024 | high | Information-seeking | 2 | Elena; Ben | At the entry area of the home, Elena receives from Ben a dish, some books, and a message from someone not present as items are being brought in for the gathering. While taking the food, she asks whether it is vegetarian so she can determine whether it will be appropriate for Susan. | {"Ben": "Answerer", "Elena": "Questioner"} | {"Ben": "Honest Signaling", "Elena": "Exaggeration"} | {"Ben": "Competing", "Elena": "Competing"} | {"Ben": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "professor"}, "Elena": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "homemaker"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben should state plainly whether the dish is vegetarian and, if needed, add only accurate details that clarify Susan's suitability without overstating or omitting relevant information.", "Elena": "Elena should ask Ben whether the dish is vegetarian using amplified emphasis on the need for certainty about Susan... | {"Ben": "Ben should assert a definitive account of the dish's vegetarian status and hold to that account if Elena challenges or presses for certainty so that the contribution is not treated as misleading.", "Elena": "Elena should press for a direct yes-or-no answer about the dish's vegetarian status and keep the exchan... | {"Ben": "Ben should track Elena's agreement, reframing, interruptions, facial tightening, or posture shifts and respond by giving a briefer or more explicit answer at once to prevent confusion about the dish's suitability.", "Elena": "Elena should watch Ben for hesitation, interruption, gaze shifts, or tension while an... | {"Ben": "Ben delivers a definitive account of whether the dish is vegetarian, and the interaction concludes with Elena verbally accepting that account for Susan's suitability while Ben maintains the same classification across any challenge or clarification.", "Elena": "Elena obtains from Ben an explicit yes-or-no class... | {"Ben": {"belief": "Elena is checking whether the dish he delivered is vegetarian because that information is needed to determine if it is suitable for Susan.", "desire": "To have the dish accurately understood in relation to Susan's dietary requirement.", "intention": "To provide Elena with a clear account of whether ... | images/scenario_024/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_024/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_024/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.