id stringlengths 16 19 | source_scenario stringlengths 12 12 | conflict_risk stringclasses 3
values | dialog_type stringclasses 4
values | num_characters int64 2 5 | characters stringlengths 9 43 | description stringlengths 266 488 | character_roles stringlengths 41 113 | expression_styles stringlengths 42 148 | conflict_characteristics stringlengths 41 123 | role_profiles stringlengths 269 746 | emotions stringlengths 34 99 | emotion_descriptions stringlengths 174 488 | expression_tasks stringlengths 292 921 | characteristic_tasks stringlengths 280 909 | interaction_regulation_tasks stringlengths 391 1.47k | interaction_outcome_tasks stringlengths 450 1.69k | bdi_risk stringlengths 938 2.83k | group_image_labeled stringlengths 37 37 | individual_images stringlengths 117 299 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
agentviss_high_41 | scenario_025 | high | Persuasion | 2 | Ethan; Mason | In the open living and kitchen area, Ethan argues that Mason should cover the replacement because Mason's earlier encounter with the table makes him responsible for the damage. Mason rejects that basis and insists that an informal ownership rule should decide liability, turning the dispute into a direct contest over wh... | {"Ethan": "Proponent", "Mason": "Respondent"} | {"Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Mason": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ethan": "Competing", "Mason": "Competing"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "office worker"}, "Mason": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "actor"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Mason": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Mason": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Mason at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must state plainly that Mason's earlier encounter with the table is the reason Mason should pay and avoid omitting or softening that causal claim because failure could shift the cost to Ethan and weaken Ethan's standing in later household disputes.", "Mason": "Mason must state plainly that the househol... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must press the causation standard as the decisive basis for payment, reject ownership-based reframing, and keep the argument centered on establishing Mason's liability.", "Mason": "Mason must press the ownership-based rule as the controlling standard, reject causation as sufficient for payment, and kee... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Mason's interruptions, hesitation, reframing, gaze shifts, posture changes, or tension cues and respond by tightening timing, repeating the causation standard, or escalating directness to keep the discussion on Mason's liability.", "Mason": "Mason must monitor Ethan's agreement, interrup... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Mason explicitly contest the governing standard for payment until the dialogue makes clear to both participants that the dispute has narrowed to whether Mason accepts causation or insists on ownership as the basis for the table's replacement cost.", "Mason": "Mason and Ethan explicitly contest the ... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Mason's earlier encounter with the table is the relevant cause of the damage, so Mason is the party who should bear the replacement cost.", "desire": "To establish shared agreement that Mason is liable for replacing the damaged table.", "intention": "To maintain the claim that causation determines... | images/scenario_025/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_025/individual/character_01.jpg", "Mason": "images/scenario_025/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_42 | scenario_026 | high | Deliberation | 2 | Ben; Ethan | Near the kitchen area of their shared apartment, Ben and Ethan discuss whether jointly buying a household item would create a fair and practical split of cost and responsibility. As they continue the conversation during an ordinary domestic moment, each refers to past roommate arrangements to support a clear position o... | {"Ben": "Deliberator", "Ethan": "Deliberator"} | {"Ben": "Honest Signaling", "Ethan": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ben": "Competing", "Ethan": "Competing"} | {"Ben": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "actor"}, "Ethan": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "office worker"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ben at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben must state plainly whether shared cost also requires clearly divided responsibility and cite prior roommate arrangements as direct evidence for Ben's preferred terms.", "Ethan": "Ethan must state plainly whether the joint purchase is worthwhile only under a practical split of money and ongoing responsibili... | {"Ben": "Ben must press for terms that secure Ben's view of a sensible and fair joint purchase while resisting concessions that would leave cost or responsibility ambiguous.", "Ethan": "Ethan must argue for acceptable terms that protect Ethan's share of responsibility and reject proposals that shift disproportionate co... | {"Ben": "Ben must watch Ethan's agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframing, gaze shifts, posture changes, and tension cues, then sharpen examples, slow pacing, or restate fairness criteria to keep the discussion from settling into unclear terms.", "Ethan": "Ethan must track Ben's agreement, hesitation, interruption... | {"Ben": "Ben and Ethan reach an explicit, mutually acknowledged decision about whether the household item should be bought jointly, with both Ben and Ethan stating matching terms for cost split and ongoing responsibility and referencing prior roommate arrangements as support.", "Ethan": "Ethan and Ben arrive at a clear... | {"Ben": {"belief": "Ben believes the decision about jointly purchasing the household item depends on whether splitting the cost will also mean clear shared responsibility, and he treats prior roommate arrangements as relevant evidence.", "desire": "Ben wants a mutually accepted understanding of whether buying the item ... | images/scenario_026/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_026/individual/character_01.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_026/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_43 | scenario_076 | high | Information-seeking | 4 | Emma; Clara; Daniel; Lucas | Near the seating area by the counter, Emma presses for the missing detail because Clara is the one positioned to explain how the family news spread and how the group should understand it. Daniel and Lucas stay with the exchange as listeners whose responses follow the account that becomes accepted, while the conversatio... | {"Clara": "Answerer", "Daniel": "Auxiliary", "Emma": "Questioner", "Lucas": "Auxiliary"} | {"Clara": "Suppression", "Daniel": "Deception", "Emma": "Exaggeration", "Lucas": "Suppression"} | {"Clara": "Competing", "Daniel": "Accommodating", "Emma": "Competing", "Lucas": "Accommodating"} | {"Clara": {"age": "32", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Chef"}, "Daniel": {"age": "35", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Professor"}, "Emma": {"age": "28", "characteristics": "Compe... | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Daniel": "Surprise", "Emma": "Neutral", "Lucas": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Daniel": "Daniel displays visible surprise upon learning that Clara knows the gender of his baby.", "Emma": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Emma at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lucas": "No clear facia... | {"Clara": "Clara must deliver a controlled explanation that leaves selective gaps about how the news circulated while still presenting a definitive account of how the group should interpret it.", "Daniel": "Daniel must give agreement-shaped responses that conceal any private uncertainty about the account so the accepte... | {"Clara": "Clara must position Clara's version as the deciding account by steering the conversation toward Clara's explanation and limiting openings for competing interpretations.", "Daniel": "Daniel must yield the floor to Emma and Clara while offering brief supportive comments that reduce friction and reinforce which... | {"Clara": "Clara must track Emma's reframing, Daniel's agreement cues, and Lucas's gaze or posture shifts, tightening or loosening detail to reassert control when challenge signals rise and to close the topic when acceptance signals appear.", "Daniel": "Daniel must monitor interruption, hesitation, facial tension, and ... | {"Clara": "Clara establishes Clara's controlled account as the accepted group explanation of how the family news circulated and how the niece-or-nephew question should be understood, as evidenced by Emma stopping further challenge and Daniel and Lucas aligning their responses to Clara's framing.", "Daniel": "Daniel hel... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Others are looking to her to explain both the source of the circulating family news and its implications for the question of niece or nephew.", "desire": "To define the meaning of the news in a way the group accepts as the authoritative account.", "intention": "To provide a controlled explanation ... | images/scenario_076/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_076/individual/character_02.jpg", "Daniel": "images/scenario_076/individual/character_03.jpg", "Emma": "images/scenario_076/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lucas": "images/scenario_076/individual/character_04.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_44 | scenario_027 | high | Deliberation | 4 | Ethan; Benjamin; Marcus; Lila | In the café lounge, the friends concentrate on Lila's decision as Ethan and Benjamin press the case that direct honesty is justified even if it threatens the friendship, while Marcus tries to keep the discussion aligned around an acceptable shared position. The conversation focuses on whether telling the absent woman d... | {"Benjamin": "Deliberator", "Ethan": "Deliberator", "Lila": "Deliberator", "Marcus": "Auxiliary"} | {"Benjamin": "Honest Signaling", "Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Lila": "Honest Signaling", "Marcus": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Benjamin": "Competing", "Ethan": "Competing", "Lila": "Competing", "Marcus": "Accommodating"} | {"Benjamin": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "university professor"}, "Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "office worker"}, "Lila"... | {"Benjamin": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral", "Marcus": "Neutral"} | {"Benjamin": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Marcus": "No clear facial affect cues are available ... | {"Benjamin": "Benjamin openly lays out reasons favoring direct truth-telling and keeps Benjamin's judgment explicit in dialogue rather than leaving the preferred conclusion implied.", "Ethan": "Ethan states plainly that direct honesty is the justified option and makes Ethan's standard explicit without softening or omit... | {"Benjamin": "Benjamin steers the exchange toward a clear conclusion that Lila should tell the absent woman directly and challenges competing framings that prioritize preserving the friendship over disclosure.", "Ethan": "Ethan pushes the discussion toward endorsing direct disclosure as the correct course and resists s... | {"Benjamin": "Benjamin tracks whether Lila, Ethan, and Marcus show agreement, reframing, interruption, gaze withdrawal, or bodily tension, and Benjamin adjusts by sharpening the reasoning when support appears firm or simplifying the argument when resistance becomes visible.", "Ethan": "Ethan watches for agreement, hesi... | {"Benjamin": "Benjamin helps produce a group exchange in which Ethan reinforces Benjamin's reasons, Lila states that direct truth-telling is defensible, and Marcus accepts wording that keeps the discussion aligned around that clear conclusion.", "Ethan": "Ethan secures explicit support from Benjamin and visible acknowl... | {"Benjamin": {"belief": "The discussion has become a practical comparison of reasons for telling the woman versus protecting the friendship, with Lila's decision as the focus.", "desire": "To establish a persuasive case that the truth should be communicated directly.", "intention": "To keep the conversation centered on... | images/scenario_027/group_labeled.png | {"Benjamin": "images/scenario_027/individual/character_02.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_027/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_027/individual/character_04.jpg", "Marcus": "images/scenario_027/individual/character_03.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_45 | scenario_028 | high | Deliberation | 2 | Ethan; Liam | Ethan and Liam focus on a small group of nearby dining table displays, comparing bird motifs with ladybug motifs as competing options for the meal setting. Each presents his own judgment about which themed table should be chosen, with the discussion centered on whose preference will guide the selection. | {"Ethan": "Deliberator", "Liam": "Deliberator"} | {"Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Liam": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ethan": "Competing", "Liam": "Competing"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "unspecified"}, "Liam": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "unspecified"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Liam": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Liam": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Liam at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must state his true evaluation of the bird-versus-ladybug displays directly and visibly link his spoken comparison to his preferred motif so his judgment is not discounted in the selection.", "Liam": "Liam must state his true evaluation of the bird-versus-ladybug displays directly and visibly connect h... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must press for his preferred motif as the better choice by defending his own evaluation over Liam's competing option with assertive, self-prioritizing arguments.", "Liam": "Liam must push his preferred motif as the more suitable choice by maintaining and justifying his position against Ethan's competin... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must monitor Liam's agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframing, gaze shifts, posture changes, and tension cues, then tighten or sharpen his comparison and timing when Liam resists and sustain his line when Liam yields.", "Liam": "Liam must track Ethan's agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframin... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Liam reach an observable comparison outcome in which Liam either verbally concedes Ethan's preferred motif or continues defending the alternative after directly addressing Ethan's stated reasons, making Ethan's influence on the final selection visibly testable through both participants' words and r... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "The current decision is between nearby dining table displays with bird motifs and ones with ladybug motifs, and Liam supports a different option from his own.", "desire": "To have his preferred table motif accepted as the better choice for the meal setting.", "intention": "To state and defend his ... | images/scenario_028/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_028/individual/character_01.jpg", "Liam": "images/scenario_028/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_46 | scenario_029 | high | Persuasion | 2 | Ethan Carter; Robert Miller | Near the doorway by the main living area and household storage, Ethan Carter corners the discussion around a single demand: Robert Miller must either end the affair with Ronni or tell Ethan Carter's mother by the next day. In the close, late-evening confrontation, Robert Miller faces pressure to account for the secret ... | {"Ethan Carter": "Proponent", "Robert Miller": "Respondent"} | {"Ethan Carter": "Strategic Withholding", "Robert Miller": "Exaggeration"} | {"Ethan Carter": "Competing", "Robert Miller": "Competing"} | {"Ethan Carter": {"age": "20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "college student"}, "Robert Miller": {"age": "50s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "small business owner"}} | {"Ethan Carter": "Neutral", "Robert Miller": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan Carter": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan Carter at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Robert Miller": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Robert Miller at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan Carter": "Ethan Carter must state only the two allowed outcomes and omit any broader family reasoning or personal leverage so Ethan Carter's dialogue keeps Robert Miller focused on an immediate next-day commitment.", "Robert Miller": "Robert Miller must use exaggeration to portray the demanded choice as overly ... | {"Ethan Carter": "Ethan Carter must maintain a competing stance by rejecting alternative framings, repeating the deadline, and directing Robert Miller to accept one option before leaving the area.", "Robert Miller": "Robert Miller must sustain a competing stance by resisting Ethan Carter's framing, asserting Robert Mil... | {"Ethan Carter": "Ethan Carter must watch for Robert Miller's hesitation, interruption, gaze breaks, posture shifts, or reframing attempts and respond by tightening wording, restating the two options, or accelerating the demand for a clear answer.", "Robert Miller": "Robert Miller must monitor Ethan Carter's repeated d... | {"Ethan Carter": "Ethan Carter must bring the exchange to an observable close in which Robert Miller verbally acknowledges Ethan Carter's two-option next-day demand, shows reduced room for reframing through dialogue and behavior, and leaves the area after Ethan Carter directs Robert Miller to go to Robert Miller's room... | {"Ethan Carter": {"belief": "Robert Miller is trying to avoid taking clear responsibility for the secret relationship, and the situation now requires an immediate commitment about what will happen by the next day.", "desire": "To secure a definite outcome in which Robert Miller either ends the affair with Ronni or disc... | images/scenario_029/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan Carter": "images/scenario_029/individual/character_01.jpg", "Robert Miller": "images/scenario_029/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_47 | scenario_030 | high | Deliberation | 2 | Ethan; Ryan | Late at night in their shared student living space, Ethan and Ryan continue a quiet conversation from where they have settled in for sleep, shifting from joking into a direct discussion of Ryan's pattern of seeing many women and whether it fits any dependable long-term commitment. Ethan keeps the exchange candid and pr... | {"Ethan": "Deliberator", "Ryan": "Deliberator"} | {"Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Ryan": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ethan": "Competing", "Ryan": "Competing"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "student"}, "Ryan": {"age": "20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "student"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Ryan": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ryan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must state plainly whether Ryan's current dating pattern matches dependable long-term commitment and avoid softening the point with vague joking or indirect phrasing.", "Ryan": "Ryan must describe Ryan's dating pattern and commitment limits in direct terms without minimizing, omitting, or recasting det... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must keep control of the discussion by pressing for concrete consistency between Ryan's stated commitment claims and Ryan's actual habits until a clear position is articulated.", "Ryan": "Ryan must use the discussion to secure a defensible self-definition by asserting what level of commitment Ryan can ... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Ryan's agreement, hesitation, reframing, gaze shifts, pauses, or tension cues and respond by sharpening the question, slowing the pace, or restating the contrast more directly.", "Ryan": "Ryan must monitor Ethan's agreement, interruption, probing follow-ups, facial focus, posture shifts,... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Ryan reach an explicit spoken conclusion, supported by Ryan's clarified account and Ethan's continued challenges to inconsistencies, about whether Ryan's current pattern can credibly fit dependable long-term commitment or only a narrower commitment stance.", "Ryan": "Ryan and Ethan arrive at a mutu... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Ryan is using the late-night conversation to examine whether his current dating pattern is consistent with being a reliable long-term partner, and Ryan is open to direct feedback.", "desire": "To help the conversation reach a clear and candid understanding of what relationship approach is actually... | images/scenario_030/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_030/individual/character_01.jpg", "Ryan": "images/scenario_030/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_48 | scenario_031 | high | Persuasion | 2 | Ethan; Ben | In a tucked-away corner of the lounge, Ethan pushes Ben to accept a reassuring view of commitment by comparing marriage to Ben's earlier career decision and by treating resistance to pressure as the key point. Ben answers within the same close, teasing exchange, engaging the comparison without clearly conceding it, and... | {"Ben": "Respondent", "Ethan": "Proponent"} | {"Ben": "Exaggeration", "Ethan": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ben": "Competing", "Ethan": "Competing"} | {"Ben": {"age": "thirties", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "actor"}, "Ethan": {"age": "thirties", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "writer"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ben at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben must answer with amplified, teasing phrasing that stretches Ethan's comparison or pressure point without explicitly granting that Ethan's framing fully fits Ben's view.", "Ethan": "Ethan must state the marriage-career analogy plainly and directly, using clear assertions that show Ethan's reassurance withou... | {"Ben": "Ben must defend Ben's position by contesting Ethan's framing on Ben's terms, using playful counterpoints that resist concession and keep Ben from being boxed into the analogy.", "Ethan": "Ethan must keep pressing Ethan's framing as the main issue, steering the exchange back to whether Ben accepts the compariso... | {"Ben": "Ben must track Ethan's insistence, pauses, interruptions, facial tension, and posture shifts and then adjust Ben's teasing intensity, response timing, or joke framing to test the argument without openly yielding.", "Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Ben's hesitation, interruptions, smile cues, gaze shifts, or refr... | {"Ben": "Ben and Ethan must arrive at an observable exchange in which Ben engages Ethan's marriage-career comparison through exaggerated teasing replies and a brief joke, leaving Ethan's framing explicitly on the table while preventing any clear verbal concession that Ben accepts the comparison as fully valid.", "Ethan... | {"Ben": {"belief": "Ethan is pressing him to treat marriage as a decision comparable to an earlier career choice and to show that outside pressure should not determine it.", "desire": "Ben wants to preserve his position in the discussion without being reduced to Ethan's comparison or conceding more certainty than he ac... | images/scenario_031/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_031/individual/character_02.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_031/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_49 | scenario_063 | high | Persuasion | 2 | Ethan; Lila | Seated together on the couch within the larger gathering, Lila raises her friends' disapproval of Ethan and positions it as an issue their relationship has to address. Their private exchange turns on whether outside criticism should carry weight or whether Lila's own view should remain decisive. | {"Ethan": "Respondent", "Lila": "Proponent"} | {"Ethan": "Suppression", "Lila": "Exaggeration"} | {"Ethan": "Competing", "Lila": "Competing"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "40s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Musician"}, "Lila": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Writer"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must keep his stance partially indirect by downplaying or omitting direct engagement with the friends' criticism while repeatedly steering his spoken focus to Lila's own judgment.", "Lila": "Lila must amplify the significance of her friends' disapproval in her wording and emphasis while still stating t... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must competitively position the exchange around the claim that outside opinions carry less authority than the couple's evaluation of the relationship.", "Lila": "Lila must competitively press Ethan to acknowledge that her friends' criticism has relational weight without surrendering her own authority t... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Lila's agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframing, gaze shifts, posture tightening, or facial tension and respond by either pressing the focus on her personal view or briefly softening timing while keeping outside criticism secondary.", "Lila": "Lila must track Ethan's agreement, hes... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Lila reach an explicit exchange in which Lila states that her own view of Ethan is the main basis for the relationship while both Ethan's repeated reframing and Lila's continued mention of her friends show that the friends' criticism is acknowledged but left secondary.", "Lila": "Lila and Ethan rea... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Lila is introducing her friends' criticism of him as a relevant issue in their conversation, and his standing in the relationship is being evaluated against outside judgment.", "desire": "He wants the discussion to center on Lila's own assessment rather than on her friends' disapproval.", "intenti... | images/scenario_063/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_063/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_063/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_50 | scenario_032 | high | Persuasion | 3 | Elena; Lila; Mia | In the coffeehouse seating area, Elena and Lila argue that Mia should judge the renewed date invitation by the man's earlier behavior, not by the fact that Valentine's Day is approaching. As Mia weighs whether to reconsider someone she had already rejected, the discussion centers on whether accepting now would be defen... | {"Elena": "Proponent", "Lila": "Auxiliary", "Mia": "Respondent"} | {"Elena": "Honest Signaling", "Lila": "Honest Signaling", "Mia": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Elena": "Competing", "Lila": "Accommodating", "Mia": "Competing"} | {"Elena": {"age": "28", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "restaurant manager"}, "Lila": {"age": "26", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "fashion assistant"}, "Mia": {"age"... | {"Elena": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral", "Mia": "Neutral"} | {"Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Mia": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Mia at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Elena": "Elena states directly that the man's earlier behavior remains the relevant standard and that Valentine's Day does not justify changing that evaluation.", "Lila": "Lila openly affirms that the earlier rejection and its reason should stay central when Mia talks through the renewed invitation.", "Mia": "Mia ope... | {"Elena": "Elena presses Mia for a decision standard centered on prior conduct and resists any reframing that treats the holiday as a sufficient reason to accept.", "Lila": "Lila supports Elena's position while phrasing agreement in a way that keeps the discussion cooperative and focused on helping Mia review prior con... | {"Elena": "Elena monitors Mia's hesitation, Lila's agreement, interruptions, gaze shifts, and posture tension to decide whether to sharpen the point, restate the earlier rejection, or pause for Mia to respond.", "Lila": "Lila watches for Mia's hesitation, Elena's interruptions, agreement cues, softened tone, gaze avers... | {"Elena": "Elena secures an interaction outcome in which Mia explicitly acknowledges in dialogue, with Lila's supporting agreement and visible attentive cues, that the man's earlier behavior remains the main standard for judging the renewed invitation rather than Valentine's Day alone.", "Lila": "Lila helps produce an ... | {"Elena": {"belief": "Mia is considering accepting a Valentine's date invitation from someone she had previously rejected, and the holiday timing does not change Elena's view of his earlier behavior.", "desire": "Mia to evaluate the invitation based on the man's prior conduct rather than the occasion.", "intention": "M... | images/scenario_032/group_labeled.png | {"Elena": "images/scenario_032/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_032/individual/character_02.jpg", "Mia": "images/scenario_032/individual/character_03.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_51 | scenario_064 | high | Eristic | 2 | Elena; Clara | Near the main seating area, Elena and Clara turn their private conversation into a contest over whose dating story counts as the worst example. Elena pushes for impact through exaggeration, while Clara counters with blunt, credible complaints, each aiming to have her account recognized as the stronger one. | {"Clara": "Quarreller", "Elena": "Quarreller"} | {"Clara": "Honest Signaling", "Elena": "Exaggeration"} | {"Clara": "Competing", "Elena": "Competing"} | {"Clara": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "office worker"}, "Elena": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "office worker"}} | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must present dating details in direct, credible terms that plainly support Clara's account as the more convincing bad example without inflating beyond what Clara can stand behind.", "Elena": "Elena must retell dating details in progressively amplified terms that make Elena's account sound more extreme ... | {"Clara": "Clara must keep a competitive stance by countering Elena's escalation with firm, concrete details, rejecting weak equivalence, and pressing Clara's story as the definitive example in the exchange.", "Elena": "Elena must keep the exchange positioned as a contest by topping Clara's examples, dismissing equal f... | {"Clara": "Clara must monitor Elena's exaggeration, overlap, reframing, widened expression, leaning in, or dismissive pauses and adjust by tightening detail, increasing bluntness, or entering sooner to keep Clara's account persuasive and significant.", "Elena": "Elena must watch for Clara's interruptions, blunt rebutta... | {"Clara": "Clara and Elena reach a visible point in the exchange where Elena's escalation is forced to answer Clara's blunt, credible details as the decisive challenge, as shown through dialogue that shifts to rebutting Clara's specifics, Clara's steady delivery and timing, and Elena's reactive comparison or pause befo... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Elena is trying to dominate the conversation by escalating the examples, and a plainly credible account can still compete for authority in the exchange.", "desire": "To have her account accepted as the more convincing and definitive example of a bad dating experience.", "intention": "To answer Ele... | images/scenario_064/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_064/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_064/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_52 | scenario_033 | high | Deliberation | 3 | Lila; Clara; Sophie | In the kitchen-dining area, the three women continue preparing the meal while informally negotiating what kind of cleansing ritual should mark the next night before Valentine's Day. As each tries to make her preferred framing of the choice carry weight, the discussion narrows from playful and practical alternatives to ... | {"Clara": "Deliberator", "Lila": "Deliberator", "Sophie": "Deliberator"} | {"Clara": "Exaggeration", "Lila": "Deception", "Sophie": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Clara": "Competing", "Lila": "Competing", "Sophie": "Competing"} | {"Clara": {"age": "mid-20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "chef"}, "Lila": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "musician"}, "Sophie": {"age": "early 30s", "characte... | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral", "Sophie": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Sophie": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Sophie at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must exaggerate the value and seriousness of her preferred ritual option so her proposal appears stronger and more worthwhile than the playful alternatives.", "Lila": "Lila must present her preferred ritual framing with deceptive emphasis that makes alternatives sound less fitting while avoiding explic... | {"Clara": "Clara must compete by asserting her proposal's superiority, minimizing rival framings, and holding conversational ground when others push different ritual choices.", "Lila": "Lila must compete for influence by pressing her framing as the most convincing option and challenging competing proposals when they th... | {"Clara": "Clara must track Lila's and Sophie's reframing, interruption, hesitation, facial changes, tension cues, and gaze direction, then increase or reduce the intensity of her exaggerated claims to preserve credibility and influence.", "Lila": "Lila must monitor Clara's and Sophie's agreement, hesitation, interrupt... | {"Clara": "Clara's exaggerated defense of a stronger ritual must lead to a visible group outcome in which Lila and Sophie respond by narrowing the discussion away from playful alternatives and jointly endorsing burning old gifts and keepsakes as the worthwhile choice, with dialogue and behavioral cues showing Clara's i... | {"Clara": {"belief": "The women are comparing multiple ways to mark Valentine's Day, and the final plan will reflect whose proposal seems most worthwhile to everyone.", "desire": "To secure group approval for a ritual option she can present as the strongest choice.", "intention": "To argue for the chosen ritual by emph... | images/scenario_033/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_033/individual/character_02.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_033/individual/character_01.jpg", "Sophie": "images/scenario_033/individual/character_03.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_53 | scenario_065 | high | Eristic | 3 | Elena; Michael; David | Near the main couch and surrounding tables, Elena and Michael treat the greeting about a romantic surprise as a public contest over whose version of the situation will stand. David remains close to the exchange and adds a side remark that sharpens the social stakes instead of reducing them. | {"David": "Auxiliary", "Elena": "Quarreller", "Michael": "Quarreller"} | {"David": "Exaggeration", "Elena": "Exaggeration", "Michael": "Exaggeration"} | {"David": "Accommodating", "Elena": "Competing", "Michael": "Competing"} | {"David": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "actor"}, "Elena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "actress"}, "Michael": {"age": "early 30s",... | {"David": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral", "Michael": "Neutral"} | {"David": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Michael": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"David": "David must add a side comment with amplified significance that shapes how the exchange is read while avoiding a statement that makes David the central disputant.", "Elena": "Elena must state her version of the greeting and romantic surprise with amplified certainty and emphasis so Elena's account appears mor... | {"David": "David must position David's contribution to stay aligned with the interaction and preserve others' lead in the dispute rather than claiming the floor.", "Elena": "Elena must directly counter Michael's framing and push Elena's interpretation as the winning public account with minimal concession.", "Michael": ... | {"David": "David must monitor whether Elena or Michael reacts with agreement, hesitation, interruption, sharp reframing, stare shifts, or tension cues and then shorten, soften, or redirect David's side remarks to avoid becoming the main target or appearing improperly involved.", "Elena": "Elena must watch for Michael's... | {"David": "David, through a provocative but secondary side remark, must bring the exchange to a state where Elena and Michael both orient their replies to David's added implication while continuing their dispute, and the dialogue, timing, and visible attention shifts show David has shaped the social reading without bec... | {"David": {"belief": "He believes Elena and Michael are already in a tense dispute over the meaning of the greeting and romantic surprise, and that his remark can influence how the exchange is socially read.", "desire": "He wants to remain aligned with the interaction without becoming the main target of the dispute.", ... | images/scenario_065/group_labeled.png | {"David": "images/scenario_065/individual/character_03.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_065/individual/character_01.jpg", "Michael": "images/scenario_065/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_54 | scenario_034 | high | Persuasion | 2 | Elena; Daniel | During the restaurant meal, Elena disputes Daniel's claim that her remark caused the problem and challenges his account of what was said. Noticing that the expected guest and coat are gone, they focus the conversation on assigning responsibility for the failed date, with Elena resisting blame and Daniel insisting her w... | {"Daniel": "Respondent", "Elena": "Proponent"} | {"Daniel": "Honest Signaling", "Elena": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Daniel": "Competing", "Elena": "Competing"} | {"Daniel": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Business Executive"}, "Elena": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Marketing Manager"}} | {"Daniel": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Daniel": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Daniel": "Daniel must present Daniel's account of Elena's remark and the guest's departure plainly and consistently, using transparent statements that support Daniel's claim that Elena's words caused the failed date.", "Elena": "Elena must state her recollection of the remark and the sequence around the missing guest... | {"Daniel": "Daniel must hold a firm self-prioritizing position by pressing Daniel's accusation and resisting shifts that would move primary responsibility from Elena to Daniel.", "Elena": "Elena must challenge Daniel's version of events in a self-advancing way by rejecting unfair blame and redirecting the discussion to... | {"Daniel": "Daniel must monitor Elena's disagreement, hesitation, interruptions, facial tightening, gaze direction, and posture shifts, then increase, narrow, or reframe Daniel's assertions to keep the conversation centered on Elena's words as the cause.", "Elena": "Elena must watch for Daniel's interruptions, hesitati... | {"Daniel": "Daniel brings the exchange to a state where Daniel and Elena openly contest the cause of the failed date, and the dialogue plus both participants' repeated rebuttals, facial tightening, gaze shifts, and posture changes keep Elena's remark established as Daniel's central basis for assigning primary responsib... | {"Daniel": {"belief": "Elena's remark contributed to the failed date, and the missing guest's absence confirms that the interaction was spoiled.", "desire": "To secure agreement that Elena's words, rather than his own conduct, caused the failed date.", "intention": "To press his accusation and maintain a version of eve... | images/scenario_034/group_labeled.png | {"Daniel": "images/scenario_034/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_034/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_55 | scenario_035 | high | Persuasion | 2 | Ethan; Lena | As the dinner continues at the grill table, Ethan and Lena lean into a more private exchange that moves from joking about the awkward meal to a direct discussion of their relationship. Ethan openly argues that they should resume it, while Lena responds warmly but makes clear that she does not want the relationship reop... | {"Ethan": "Proponent", "Lena": "Respondent"} | {"Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Lena": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ethan": "Competing", "Lena": "Competing"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "late 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "university lecturer"}, "Lena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "lawyer"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Lena": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lena at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must state directly that resuming the relationship is a serious option and make his position explicit without implying that Lena has already agreed.", "Lena": "Lena must speak with cordial clarity by acknowledging Ethan's sincerity while explicitly stating that reopening the relationship is not an opti... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must press the case for renewal by advancing reasons and keeping the discussion centered on whether the relationship should be resumed despite risk of explicit rejection.", "Lena": "Lena must hold a firm boundary by refusing renewed involvement and preventing the discussion from drifting into treating ... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Lena's hesitation, reframing, interruptions, gaze withdrawal, or posture tightening and respond by sharpening or briefly moderating his wording while still returning the exchange to his proposal.", "Lena": "Lena must monitor Ethan's persistence through renewed arguments, interruptions, l... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Lena explicitly establish in dialogue that Ethan has directly presented resuming the relationship as a serious option and that Lena has heard and answered that proposal without signaling agreement, as shown through Ethan's continued argument, Lena's verbal reply, and both participants' observable a... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "He believes the conversation has shifted from joking into a direct discussion about whether they should renew their relationship, and that Lena's affectionate replies do not amount to agreement.", "desire": "He wants Lena to seriously consider resuming the relationship and to treat his proposal as... | images/scenario_035/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_035/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lena": "images/scenario_035/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_56 | scenario_036 | high | Persuasion | 2 | Sophie; Mark | At an evening work gathering, Sophie and Mark sit close among colleagues and speak quietly while the event continues around them. Sophie directly pushes for a clear answer on a provocative request, and Mark resists committing before giving a reluctant, awkwardly limited reply. | {"Mark": "Respondent", "Sophie": "Proponent"} | {"Mark": "Honest Signaling", "Sophie": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Mark": "Competing", "Sophie": "Competing"} | {"Mark": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "office professional"}, "Sophie": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "office professional"}} | {"Mark": "Neutral", "Sophie": "Neutral"} | {"Mark": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Mark at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Sophie": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Sophie at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Mark": "Mark must honestly signal limited commitment by giving a qualified reply that openly avoids full endorsement, with the restriction evident in Mark’s wording, pauses, and awkward delivery.", "Sophie": "Sophie must state the request and the need for a definite answer plainly and without softening, making the la... | {"Mark": "Mark must hold a competing position by protecting Mark’s own flexibility and refusing to provide the clear commitment Sophie seeks while still keeping the reply minimally workable.", "Sophie": "Sophie must maintain a competing stance by repeatedly steering the exchange back to Mark’s exact position until Mark... | {"Mark": "Mark must monitor Sophie’s direct prompts, reframing, interruptions, fixed gaze, and forward posture, and then adjust timing, brevity, and qualification level to contain pressure without shifting into full agreement.", "Sophie": "Sophie must watch for Mark’s hesitation, interruptions, qualified phrasing, gaze... | {"Mark": "Mark leaves the exchange with a socially workable but restricted position on record, evidenced by Sophie’s continued direct narrowing of the question and Mark’s reluctant, qualified reply, pauses, and constrained behavioral cues that show Mark did not give the full commitment Sophie sought.", "Sophie": "Sophi... | {"Mark": {"belief": "Sophie is pressing for a direct answer that could define his position in front of a nearby professional peer environment, even if spoken quietly.", "desire": "To avoid giving a fully endorsing response while still keeping the exchange socially manageable.", "intention": "To limit his commitment by ... | images/scenario_036/group_labeled.png | {"Mark": "images/scenario_036/individual/character_02.jpg", "Sophie": "images/scenario_036/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_57 | scenario_037 | high | Persuasion | 2 | Ethan; Nathan | In the shared apartment kitchen, Ethan treats saying the intimate lines aloud as the necessary way for Nathan to prepare for seeing the woman again, and he keeps the discussion focused on that exercise. Nathan resists that format through joking and partial disengagement, trying to avoid full verbal commitment while Eth... | {"Ethan": "Proponent", "Nathan": "Respondent"} | {"Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Nathan": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Ethan": "Competing", "Nathan": "Competing"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "28", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "student"}, "Nathan": {"age": "30", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "student"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Nathan": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Nathan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Nathan at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must state plainly that saying the intimate lines aloud is necessary and keep Ethan's wording direct and explicit rather than softened or concealed.", "Nathan": "Nathan must limit explicit verbal commitment by using jokes, partial answers, or topic slippage while avoiding direct statements that fully e... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must keep pressing Nathan toward the verbal exercise, reject deflecting jokes as off-task, and maintain Ethan's preferred format despite resistance.", "Nathan": "Nathan must compete for control of the exchange by resisting Ethan's demanded format, preserving Nathan's own boundaries on what is said alou... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Nathan's joking, hesitation, gaze breaks, posture withdrawal, or interruptions and respond by tightening the prompt, restating the requirement, or pausing briefly before re-centering the exercise.", "Nathan": "Nathan must monitor Ethan's insistence, reframing, interruptions, fixed gaze, ... | {"Ethan": "Ethan secures a moment in which Nathan verbally repeats at least part of the intimate lines aloud after Ethan rejects Nathan's jokes and re-centers the exchange, with both participants' dialogue and behavior showing that the kitchen conversation remains organized around Ethan's demanded exercise.", "Nathan":... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Nathan is avoiding direct verbal practice, and Ethan believes that rehearsing the intimate lines aloud is necessary for Nathan to handle a future romantic interaction successfully.", "desire": "Ethan wants Nathan to explicitly engage in the verbal exercise and accept the conversation as the proper... | images/scenario_037/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_037/individual/character_01.jpg", "Nathan": "images/scenario_037/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_58 | scenario_066 | high | Eristic | 3 | Daniel; Michael; Brian | At the kitchen counter by the phone, Daniel, Michael, and Brian compress into a tense argument where a suggestive joke is immediately repurposed as ridicule and a contest over who controls the exchange. When the ringing call redirects them to the former job offer, each tries to secure his own version of the issue, and ... | {"Brian": "Quarreller", "Daniel": "Quarreller", "Michael": "Quarreller"} | {"Brian": "Deception", "Daniel": "Honest Signaling", "Michael": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Brian": "Competing", "Daniel": "Competing", "Michael": "Competing"} | {"Brian": {"age": "34", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "former office worker"}, "Daniel": {"age": "32", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "researcher"}, "Michael": {"age": "30", "chara... | {"Brian": "Neutral", "Daniel": "Neutral", "Michael": "Neutral"} | {"Brian": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Brian at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Daniel": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Daniel at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Michael": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Michael at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Brian": "Brian must present the former job-offer issue in a misleadingly supportive way that guides Daniel and Michael toward accepting Brian's account as the stronger version.", "Daniel": "Daniel must state objections and refusal in direct, explicit terms that openly mark the joke and the job-offer talk as challenge... | {"Brian": "Brian must compete by using the renewed topic as argumentative ammunition, asserting Brian's version over challenges and pressing for acceptance of Brian's credibility.", "Daniel": "Daniel must contest ridicule and resist others' framing attempts by pressing Daniel's position forcefully until overt refusal c... | {"Brian": "Brian must track disagreement, hesitation, overlap, skeptical looks, posture shifts, or diverted gaze from Daniel and Michael, and respond by changing emphasis, doubling down on claimed facts, or briefly softening delivery to keep Brian's account in control.", "Daniel": "Daniel must watch for interruptions, ... | {"Brian": "Brian must bring about a shared interaction state in which Michael's uptake and Daniel's forced responses make Brian's account of the former job offer the dominant reference point in the argument, even as Daniel continues to contest its legitimacy.", "Daniel": "Daniel must bring Michael and Brian to visibly ... | {"Brian": {"belief": "He believes the reopened issue of the former job offer gives him an opportunity to strengthen his side of the conflict by making his account prevail.", "desire": "He wants his version of the dispute to be accepted and to keep the others from challenging his credibility in the moment.", "intention"... | images/scenario_066/group_labeled.png | {"Brian": "images/scenario_066/individual/character_03.jpg", "Daniel": "images/scenario_066/individual/character_01.jpg", "Michael": "images/scenario_066/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_59 | scenario_038 | high | Information-seeking | 3 | Ethan; Sophia; Elena | Near the seating area, Ethan samples the first course as Sophia sustains the hosting around drinks and Elena explains the prepared dish and the next course. The conversation remains centered on understanding the dishes as Elena presents them, and Ethan aligns with the meal's progression toward the kitchen. | {"Elena": "Answerer", "Ethan": "Questioner", "Sophia": "Auxiliary"} | {"Elena": "Suppression", "Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Sophia": "Suppression"} | {"Elena": "Competing", "Ethan": "Competing", "Sophia": "Accommodating"} | {"Elena": {"age": "27", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Culinary Artist"}, "Ethan": {"age": "30", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Food Critic"}, "Sophia": {"age": "28", "charact... | {"Elena": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral", "Sophia": "Neutral"} | {"Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Sophia": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Elena": "Elena gives selective, concise explanations of the prepared dish and next course while keeping unstated any details that do not strengthen Elena's intended course-by-course framing.", "Ethan": "Ethan uses direct tasting remarks and explicit questions about the current and next course to show genuine understa... | {"Elena": "Elena maintains control of the meal narrative by asserting the sequence and intended interpretation of the dishes rather than opening the exchange to broad alternative framings.", "Ethan": "Ethan steers turns toward precise dish-related details that support Ethan's informed standing even when the flow is bei... | {"Elena": "Elena tracks Ethan's agreement, reframing attempts, interruptions, and non-verbal signals such as gaze drift or posture shifts, then responds by tightening explanations, emphasizing key dish terms, or reclaiming the sequence with a timed transition to the next course.", "Ethan": "Ethan monitors Elena's elabo... | {"Elena": "Elena secures group acknowledgment of the meal as a coherent sequence when Ethan's tasting remarks and clarifying questions align with Elena's stated framing of the current dish and next course, while Sophia's hosting support keeps that framing socially centered.", "Ethan": "Ethan and Elena reach a shared, e... | {"Elena": {"belief": "Ethan is evaluating the meal through tasting and discussion, and the group's attention is currently centered on her explanation of what has been prepared and what will follow.", "desire": "To have the meal understood as a coherent, course-by-course presentation and to secure recognition of the dis... | images/scenario_038/group_labeled.png | {"Elena": "images/scenario_038/individual/character_03.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_038/individual/character_01.jpg", "Sophia": "images/scenario_038/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_60 | scenario_077 | high | Information-seeking | 2 | Miles; Ethan | At the coffeehouse counter, Miles presses Ethan for a direct, firsthand account of how the evening with Celia concluded, keeping the focus on Ethan's knowledge rather than himself. Ethan responds with a detailed version of events, and their exchange tightens into a teasing but explicit effort to establish what can be t... | {"Ethan": "Answerer", "Miles": "Questioner"} | {"Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Miles": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Ethan": "Competing", "Miles": "Competing"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "late 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Professor"}, "Miles": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Actor"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Miles": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Miles": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Miles at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan should state a concrete sequence of what happened with Celia in direct terms, using observable details and avoiding vague summaries.", "Miles": "Miles should ask narrowly targeted questions that elicit Ethan's specifics while omitting Miles's own stake or interpretation of the evening."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan should assert his firsthand account as the definitive basis for the outcome and resist letting Miles recast the account into a less precise version.", "Miles": "Miles should keep control of the exchange by repeatedly redirecting the talk to Ethan's firsthand details until a clear outcome is stated."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan should track Miles's agreement, teasing reframes, interruptions, or skeptical facial and gaze cues and adjust by adding specificity, slowing the delivery, or restating the key point more plainly to secure acceptance of Ethan's account.", "Miles": "Miles should watch for Ethan's hesitation, interruption... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Miles settle on Ethan's firsthand version as the accepted outcome of the evening with Celia, with Ethan's detailed answers and plain restatements leading Miles to acknowledge the specific conclusion in dialogue.", "Miles": "Miles and Ethan arrive at an explicitly stated account of how the evening w... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Miles is asking for a direct account of what happened with Celia and is looking for concrete confirmation rather than vague summary.", "desire": "To establish an accepted version of the evening's outcome through open disclosure.", "intention": "To answer with enough specificity that the conversati... | images/scenario_077/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_077/individual/character_02.jpg", "Miles": "images/scenario_077/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_61 | scenario_039 | high | Information-seeking | 2 | Lily; Mia | In the busy neighborhood café, Lily asks Mia what she wants for her birthday, but Mia's first answer is too personal to function as a clear gift request. As they continue talking over coffee, Lily presses for something practical and the conversation settles on a simple suggestion from a bath-and-body shop. | {"Lily": "Questioner", "Mia": "Answerer"} | {"Lily": "Suppression", "Mia": "Deception"} | {"Lily": "Competing", "Mia": "Competing"} | {"Lily": {"age": "28", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "waitress"}, "Mia": {"age": "26", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "musician"}} | {"Lily": "Neutral", "Mia": "Neutral"} | {"Lily": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lily at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Mia": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Mia at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Lily": "Lily should suppress commentary on Mia's initial personal answer and phrase follow-up questions in a narrowed, practical way that elicits a concrete gift item.", "Mia": "Mia should use deception by replacing the personal answer with a socially acceptable specific suggestion and presenting it as a clear usable... | {"Lily": "Lily should take a competing position by repeatedly directing the exchange toward definite options and treating vague answers as insufficient until a simple actionable gift is named.", "Mia": "Mia should take a competing position by steering the final choice toward a gift suggestion Mia can accept while minim... | {"Lily": "Lily should monitor Mia's agreement, hesitation, reframing, gaze shifts, and posture tension, then tighten or soften question framing and pacing to keep the talk moving toward a settled practical answer.", "Mia": "Mia should track Lily's interruptions, insistence, pauses, eye focus, and leaning posture, then ... | {"Lily": "Lily and Mia explicitly settle on a simple bath-and-body shop gift suggestion as the practical birthday answer, with Lily's narrowed follow-up questions and Mia's confirming reply, reduced hesitation, and steady attention making the result observable.", "Mia": "Mia and Lily reach a mutually accepted practical... | {"Lily": {"belief": "Mia's initial reply does not give a clear, usable gift option, so the discussion needs to be narrowed to something concrete.", "desire": "To reach a specific and practical birthday gift answer that can be treated as settled between them.", "intention": "To keep steering the conversation toward defi... | images/scenario_039/group_labeled.png | {"Lily": "images/scenario_039/individual/character_01.jpg", "Mia": "images/scenario_039/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_62 | scenario_040 | high | Eristic | 4 | Ethan; Lila; Elena; Ryan | Around the kitchen table, Ethan continues framing his plan to buy clothing for another woman as acceptable, while Lila openly contests that position in front of the group. Elena stays close and follows the dispute without taking a side, and when the argument stalls into a strained pause, Ryan intervenes to redirect the... | {"Elena": "Auxiliary", "Ethan": "Quarreller", "Lila": "Quarreller", "Ryan": "Auxiliary"} | {"Elena": "Strategic Withholding", "Ethan": "Strategic Withholding", "Lila": "Suppression", "Ryan": "Deception"} | {"Elena": "Accommodating", "Ethan": "Competing", "Lila": "Competing", "Ryan": "Accommodating"} | {"Elena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Model"}, "Ethan": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Actor"}, "Lila": {"age":... | {"Elena": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral", "Ryan": "Neutral"} | {"Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ryan": "No clear facial af... | {"Elena": "Elena should stay observably noncommittal by withholding any clear evaluative statement, limiting responses to neutral acknowledgments and attentive listening cues.", "Ethan": "Ethan should present the gift and upcoming date as acceptable while strategically omitting details that would strengthen Lila's publ... | {"Elena": "Elena should prioritize keeping harmony by avoiding commitment to either side and allowing Ethan and Lila to define the dispute without Elena's endorsement.", "Ethan": "Ethan should keep defining the discussion on Ethan's terms by directly defending Ethan's framing and resisting concessions that would weaken... | {"Elena": "Elena should track interruptions, requests for alignment, strained pauses, leaning bodies, or searching eye contact and then adjust Elena's timing with short neutral comments, silence, or gaze shifts to avoid being pulled into a side.", "Ethan": "Ethan should watch for Lila's interruptions, others' hesitatio... | {"Elena": "Elena should contribute to an outcome where Ethan and Lila remain the only explicit opponents in the dispute and Ryan is able to redirect the strained pause without Elena giving dialogue or behavioral evidence of siding with either one.", "Ethan": "Ethan should bring the exchange to a point where Lila's publ... | {"Elena": {"belief": "She believes the conversation has shifted from casual talk into a visible dispute between Ethan and Lila, with everyone nearby aware of the tension.", "desire": "She wants the exchange to settle without forcing her into taking a public side.", "intention": "She commits to remaining observant and n... | images/scenario_040/group_labeled.png | {"Elena": "images/scenario_040/individual/character_03.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_040/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_040/individual/character_02.jpg", "Ryan": "images/scenario_040/individual/character_04.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_63 | scenario_041 | high | Deliberation | 3 | Ethan; Lily; Daniel | Near the café's main tables, Ethan openly questions whether he is prepared for the responsibilities of raising a child, seeking a clear response to his concerns. Lily addresses the issue directly as an evaluation of readiness, while Daniel adds a light side remark that aims to keep the exchange socially smooth without ... | {"Daniel": "Auxiliary", "Ethan": "Deliberator", "Lily": "Deliberator"} | {"Daniel": "Honest Signaling", "Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Lily": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Daniel": "Accommodating", "Ethan": "Competing", "Lily": "Competing"} | {"Daniel": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "office worker"}, "Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "university professor"}, "Lily... | {"Daniel": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Fear", "Lily": "Neutral"} | {"Daniel": "There are no clear facial affect cues for Daniel at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "Ethan's facial affect at the beginning of the dialogue is dominated by anxiety about becoming a father.", "Lily": "There are no clear facial affect cues for Lily at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Daniel": "Daniel must offer a light but truthful side remark that stays relevant to Ethan's readiness question and does not mask the seriousness of the topic.", "Ethan": "Ethan must state his doubts about meeting child-raising responsibilities in direct and specific terms and visibly seek a clear acknowledgment of wh... | {"Daniel": "Daniel must position Daniel's contribution as supportive to both Ethan and Lily by easing the social flow without competing to define the final judgment.", "Ethan": "Ethan must press the exchange toward a definite evaluation of Ethan's readiness by asking for explicit judgments rather than leaving the discu... | {"Daniel": "Daniel must monitor agreement, reframing, interruption, hesitation, facial strain, gaze direction, and body tension from Ethan and Lily, then shorten, soften, or pause Daniel's remark so the tone stays smooth without appearing trivializing.", "Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Lily's direct answers, Daniel's sm... | {"Daniel": "Daniel's light but truthful side remark is taken up by Ethan and Lily as socially smoothing and still relevant to Ethan's readiness question, while Lily's direct evaluation remains central and Ethan continues seeking clarity, as shown through the dialogue, Daniel's thought descriptions, and the participants... | {"Daniel": {"belief": "He believes Ethan and Lily are balancing concern and reassurance about Ethan's ability to manage upcoming parental responsibilities, and that his side comment can influence the tone without taking over the exchange.", "desire": "He wants to contribute in a way that keeps the conversation socially... | images/scenario_041/group_labeled.png | {"Daniel": "images/scenario_041/individual/character_03.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_041/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lily": "images/scenario_041/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_64 | scenario_042 | high | Deliberation | 2 | Ethan; Clara | At the kitchen table, Ethan and Clara move from a joking interruption into a direct discussion of what standard a relationship should meet after past disappointments. Their exchange centers on whether comfort alone is enough, or whether a partner must realistically offer both closeness and attraction, with each trying ... | {"Clara": "Deliberator", "Ethan": "Deliberator"} | {"Clara": "Honest Signaling", "Ethan": "Exaggeration"} | {"Clara": "Competing", "Ethan": "Competing"} | {"Clara": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "creative professional"}, "Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "office worker"}} | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must state her criteria plainly and transparently by explicitly weighing closeness and attraction together without hiding tradeoffs or resorting to vague comparison.", "Ethan": "Ethan must amplify examples and wording that make mere comfort sound clearly insufficient while avoiding statements that conc... | {"Clara": "Clara must competitively hold the floor on what counts as a viable partner by insisting on practical criteria and challenging any framing that turns the standard into an abstract ideal.", "Ethan": "Ethan must press a self-favoring standard by repeatedly steering the discussion toward attraction as a required... | {"Clara": "Clara must track Ethan's agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframing, gaze direction, posture changes, and facial tension cues and then adjust pacing, specificity, or firmness to keep her position from seeming inconsistent or impractical.", "Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Clara's agreement, hesitation, int... | {"Clara": "Clara and Ethan arrive at a concrete definition of a viable partner in which Ethan responds to Clara's plain criteria with dialogue that addresses both closeness and attraction together, and Clara's steady specificity and floor-holding keep the standard framed as practical rather than vague or inconsistent."... | {"Clara": {"belief": "She believes they are no longer joking and are directly assessing what kind of partnership can reasonably be pursued after disappointing experiences.", "desire": "She wants the conversation to establish a realistic relationship standard that honestly weighs emotional closeness and attraction toget... | images/scenario_042/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_042/individual/character_02.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_042/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_65 | scenario_043 | high | Deliberation | 4 | Ethan; Ben; Lila; Sophie | Near the dining area opening into the living space, Ethan, Lila, and Sophie briefly dispute how the child's visit the next day should be arranged with a relative and who should be understood as responsible for overseeing it. Ben stands nearby and comments in a way that tries to help the group settle on a shared underst... | {"Ben": "Auxiliary", "Ethan": "Deliberator", "Lila": "Deliberator", "Sophie": "Deliberator"} | {"Ben": "Exaggeration", "Ethan": "Suppression", "Lila": "Suppression", "Sophie": "Deception"} | {"Ben": "Accommodating", "Ethan": "Competing", "Lila": "Competing", "Sophie": "Competing"} | {"Ben": {"age": "thirties", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "office worker"}, "Ethan": {"age": "thirties", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "scientist"}, "Lila": {"age": "thirties", ... | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral", "Sophie": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ben at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Sophie": "No clear facial affe... | {"Ben": "Ben should describe overlap and workability in the others' positions more strongly than the discussion strictly shows so Ben's comments make agreement seem close and practical.", "Ethan": "Ethan should state a firm interpretation of the next day's arrangement while keeping uncertainty about alternatives and do... | {"Ben": "Ben should position Ben's contribution as a concession-friendly summary that preserves each person's face while moving the group toward a single workable arrangement.", "Ethan": "Ethan should repeatedly anchor the discussion to Ethan's preferred understanding of the visit and push for explicit group acceptance... | {"Ben": "Ben should track agreement cues, pauses, interruptions, frowns, shifting stance, and eye contact among Ethan, Lila, and Sophie, and adjust Ben's timing and phrasing by softening disputes or reinforcing emerging common ground.", "Ethan": "Ethan should watch for interruption, hesitation, reframing, tightened pos... | {"Ben": "Ben produces a concession-friendly summary that Ethan, Lila, and Sophie each respond to with confirming wording, reduced contradiction, or visible settling cues, resulting in a single workable arrangement for the child's visit being jointly treated as the group's understanding.", "Ethan": "Ethan reaches a poin... | {"Ben": {"belief": "There is uncertainty among the others about the child's plan for the next day, and his comments can help the discussion move toward agreement.", "desire": "To support a version of the arrangement that the others can accommodate without further dispute.", "intention": "To frame his comments in a way ... | images/scenario_043/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_043/individual/character_02.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_043/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_043/individual/character_03.jpg", "Sophie": "images/scenario_043/individual/character_04.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_66 | scenario_078 | high | Eristic | 3 | Elena; Lila; Dante | In the apartment kitchen, a tense discussion about the unexpected phone call and Elena's looming work shift narrows into a dispute over whether the conversation is finished. Elena treats the exchange as closed and moves to leave, Lila remains close as the conflict sharpens between the table and doorway, and Dante keeps... | {"Dante": "Quarreller", "Elena": "Quarreller", "Lila": "Auxiliary"} | {"Dante": "Exaggeration", "Elena": "Honest Signaling", "Lila": "Exaggeration"} | {"Dante": "Competing", "Elena": "Competing", "Lila": "Accommodating"} | {"Dante": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "actor"}, "Elena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "waitress"}, "Lila": {"age": "early 30s", "... | {"Dante": "Neutral", "Elena": "Fear", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Dante": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Dante at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "Elena displays visible signs of anxiety at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Dante": "Dante must heighten the importance and incompleteness of the phone-call and work-shift issue in speech and insistence so that Elena is publicly pressed to acknowledge it before leaving.", "Elena": "Elena must state directly that the conversation is finished and pair that claim with leaving-oriented movement ... | {"Dante": "Dante must keep a self-prioritizing stance by challenging Elena's attempt to close the exchange and pushing for an answer despite relationship costs in the kitchen standoff.", "Elena": "Elena must hold a firm closure position, reject reopened questioning, and prioritize exiting over negotiating the terms of ... | {"Dante": "Dante must watch for Elena's brief answers, turn toward the exit, blocked gaze, and Lila's hesitation or reframing, then decide whether to intensify questioning, rephrase the challenge, or stop before appearing overtly intrusive.", "Elena": "Elena must track Dante's interruptions or reframing and Lila's prox... | {"Dante": "Dante must shape the interaction into an observable unresolved standoff by continuing to press the phone-call and work-shift issue against Elena's closure statements and alongside Lila's de-escalating cues, resulting in Elena exiting without giving the fuller response Dante sought.", "Elena": "Elena must bri... | {"Dante": {"belief": "Elena is trying to leave without fully answering about the phone call and looming work shift, and the issue remains open enough for him to keep pressing it.", "desire": "To secure a response or acknowledgment from Elena before the conversation ends.", "intention": "To continue challenging the clos... | images/scenario_078/group_labeled.png | {"Dante": "images/scenario_078/individual/character_03.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_078/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_078/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_67 | scenario_044 | high | Information-seeking | 2 | Clara; Lila | At a busy social gathering, Lila briefly draws Clara aside from the main flow of conversation to address a question tied to her wedding plans. In their private exchange, Lila seeks a clear answer from Clara about whether she will take the role of maid of honour, while Clara is positioned to define her stance directly. | {"Clara": "Answerer", "Lila": "Questioner"} | {"Clara": "Suppression", "Lila": "Suppression"} | {"Clara": "Competing", "Lila": "Competing"} | {"Clara": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "student"}, "Lila": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "student"}} | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must state a definite position on the maid of honour role while keeping surrounding justification minimal and indirect so the stance is clear without fully elaborating motives.", "Lila": "Lila must ask for an explicit yes-or-no answer about the maid of honour role while keeping Lila's broader reasoning... | {"Clara": "Clara must prioritize establishing Clara's own position quickly and firmly in the exchange rather than opening space for negotiation about the role.", "Lila": "Lila must press for a clear resolution that serves Lila's wedding planning needs even if the exchange becomes more pointed or narrow in scope."} | {"Clara": "Clara must watch for Lila's interruptions, hesitation, reframing, tightened posture, or fixed gaze and respond by sharpening or briefly repeating Clara's answer with adjusted brevity or firmness.", "Lila": "Lila must monitor Clara's pauses, deflections, interruptions, gaze shifts, or posture changes and resp... | {"Clara": "Clara and Lila end the private exchange with Clara's position on serving as maid of honour explicitly stated, recognized by Lila as definite, and reinforced through Clara's brief firm wording, repeated answer if challenged, and both participants' narrowed focus and settled turn-taking.", "Lila": "Lila and Cl... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Clara believes Lila is asking her directly to confirm whether she will serve as maid of honour in Lila's wedding plans.", "desire": "Clara wants the exchange to produce a clear understanding of her position regarding the maid of honour role.", "intention": "Clara intends to give Lila a definite re... | images/scenario_044/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_044/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_044/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_68 | scenario_045 | high | Eristic | 3 | Emma; Lucas; Clara | Inside the dental office during work hours, Emma and Clara confront Lucas together near the chair and treatment equipment, stating that they are ending their relationships with him while challenging the truth of his explanations. The argument centers on exposing contradictions about his overlapping involvement, with Em... | {"Clara": "Quarreller", "Emma": "Quarreller", "Lucas": "Quarreller"} | {"Clara": "Exaggeration", "Emma": "Exaggeration", "Lucas": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Clara": "Competing", "Emma": "Competing", "Lucas": "Competing"} | {"Clara": {"age": "mid-20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "dental assistant"}, "Emma": {"age": "mid-20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "dental assistant"}, "Lucas": {"age": "... | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Emma": "Neutral", "Lucas": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Emma": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Emma at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lucas": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lucas at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must intensify the apparent weight of Lucas's inconsistencies through emphatic phrasing and visible alignment with Emma so Lucas's account loses authority over the breakup's meaning.", "Emma": "Emma must amplify the seriousness and pattern of Lucas's contradictions in her wording and emphatic delivery ... | {"Clara": "Clara must back Emma's challenge while forcefully asserting her own ending of the relationship, preventing Lucas from placing Clara in a secondary or doubtful position.", "Emma": "Emma must press Lucas with pointed challenges and assert breakup terms that disadvantage Lucas, keeping control of the exchange i... | {"Clara": "Clara must track Emma's agreement, Lucas's hesitation, interruptions, gaze avoidance, and tension cues and adjust by stepping in to reinforce points, escalating emphasis, or redirecting back to contradictions when Lucas deflects.", "Emma": "Emma must watch Lucas's interruptions, pauses, gaze shifts, and post... | {"Clara": "Clara, through visible alignment with Emma and forceful reinforcement of key contradictions, brings about an exchange in which Lucas's excuses are jointly contested by both women and the end of Clara's relationship with Lucas is observably fixed in dialogue and behavior without Lucas defining its meaning.", ... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Lucas has misrepresented his involvement with her and Emma, and confronting him together gives her leverage to expose those inconsistencies.", "desire": "To secure acknowledgment that the relationship is over and that Lucas's account does not define the situation.", "intention": "To reinforce Emma... | images/scenario_045/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_045/individual/character_03.jpg", "Emma": "images/scenario_045/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lucas": "images/scenario_045/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_69 | scenario_067 | high | Eristic | 2 | Elena; Clara | In the apartment's common area near the kitchen, Clara holds a printed sheet while pressing a case about another woman's choices as evidence for a broader claim about envy, money, and imagined better lives. Elena answers with blunt dismissals that challenge Clara's framing, and the conversation narrows into a struggle ... | {"Clara": "Quarreller", "Elena": "Quarreller"} | {"Clara": "Suppression", "Elena": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Clara": "Competing", "Elena": "Competing"} | {"Clara": {"age": "30", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "restaurant manager"}, "Elena": {"age": "28", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "graphic designer"}} | {"Clara": "Anger", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "Clara's face is tense and unsettled as she reviews the actions of the person who stole her identity.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must present the printed-sheet examples as support for Clara's broader claim while suppressing direct acknowledgment of gaps or uncertainty in Clara's reasoning.", "Elena": "Elena must state explicit objections to Clara's examples and conclusions in direct terms that transparently signal Elena's view t... | {"Clara": "Clara must compete for interpretive control by insisting on the coherence of Clara's selected examples and resisting Elena's attempts to redefine the issue.", "Elena": "Elena must keep the exchange adversarial by pressing counterclaims and challenges that prioritize establishing Elena's interpretation as the... | {"Clara": "Clara must track Elena's dismissals, interruptions, blunt reframing, gaze direction, and tension cues and adjust pacing, emphasis, or linkage between examples to preserve Clara's credibility and keep Clara's interpretation in play.", "Elena": "Elena must watch for Clara's interruptions, hesitation, reframing... | {"Clara": "Clara secures an interaction outcome in which Elena's blunt dismissals are forced into direct engagement with the printed-sheet examples as a connected case, while Elena's replies, internal focus on Clara's links, and observable pauses or facial tightening leave Clara's interpretation standing as coherent an... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Her examples about the other woman support a broader point about envy, money, and imagined alternatives, and Elena is trying to discredit that point rather than engage with it.", "desire": "To have her interpretation accepted as coherent and defensible within the argument.", "intention": "To conti... | images/scenario_067/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_067/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_067/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_70 | scenario_046 | high | Eristic | 2 | Ava; Lila | Late at night in the apartment kitchen, Ava and Lila sit across from each other as a routine conversation narrows into a pointed contest over whose life should count as more enviable. Ava presses a comparison built around opportunities and family obligations, while Lila resists Ava's framing by recasting those same poi... | {"Ava": "Quarreller", "Lila": "Quarreller"} | {"Ava": "Honest Signaling", "Lila": "Suppression"} | {"Ava": "Competing", "Lila": "Competing"} | {"Ava": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "student"}, "Lila": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "restaurant manager"}} | {"Ava": "Neutral", "Lila": "Sadness"} | {"Ava": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ava at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "Lila's facial expression shows frustration and a sense of inadequacy at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ava": "Ava must state her comparison criteria around opportunities and family obligations directly and specifically, without softening or omitting the burdens she wants counted against the risk of being seen as comparatively advantaged.", "Lila": "Lila must keep her stance indirect by selectively withholding full agr... | {"Ava": "Ava must keep pressing her own comparison framework and challenge Lila's counterexamples in order to secure recognition of Ava's disadvantages rather than conceding the dispute.", "Lila": "Lila must competitively resist Ava's comparison terms by redirecting each cited opportunity or obligation into evidence th... | {"Ava": "Ava must watch for Lila's interruptions, reframing, gaze withdrawal, tightened posture, or hesitation and respond by sharpening examples, narrowing timing between turns, or restating the criteria more explicitly.", "Lila": "Lila must track Ava's insistence, overlap, fixed gaze, forward lean, or pauses and adju... | {"Ava": "Ava and Lila end up explicitly disputing whether Ava's opportunities and family obligations count as burdens or advantages, with Ava repeatedly restating the criteria and Lila openly answering each example with a competing interpretation.", "Lila": "Lila and Ava end up in a visible back-and-forth where Lila's ... | {"Ava": {"belief": "Lila is treating the conversation as a comparison of whose circumstances are more favorable and is dismissing the burdens Ava sees as relevant.", "desire": "To have her disadvantages recognized as legitimate within the comparison and to avoid conceding that Lila's life is clearly less enviable.", "i... | images/scenario_046/group_labeled.png | {"Ava": "images/scenario_046/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_046/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_71 | scenario_068 | high | Deliberation | 2 | Ethan; Ryan | At a table in the busy café, Ethan and Ryan use the conversation to compare stage-name options and influence which ones remain under serious consideration. As coffee arrives, they narrow the list by framing certain versions as more or less suitable for casting and professional representation. | {"Ethan": "Deliberator", "Ryan": "Deliberator"} | {"Ethan": "Deception", "Ryan": "Exaggeration"} | {"Ethan": "Competing", "Ryan": "Competing"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "writer"}, "Ryan": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "actor"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Ryan": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ryan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ryan at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must deceptively present disfavored stage-name options as less credible for casting or representation while masking that Ethan is steering the shortlist toward Ethan's preferred evaluation frame.", "Ryan": "Ryan must exaggerate the casting and representation strengths of Ryan's preferred stage-name opt... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must competitively press Ethan's professional-suitability criteria as the deciding standard and resist letting Ryan's preferred options define the comparison.", "Ryan": "Ryan must competitively defend Ryan's favored options by pushing Ryan's viability judgments over Ethan's framing and contesting attem... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Ryan's agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframing, gaze shifts, posture changes, and facial tension, then sharpen, delay, or reframe Ethan's claims to keep influence when Ryan resists and intensify exclusion of options when Ryan yields.", "Ryan": "Ryan must track Ethan's agreement, h... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Ryan explicitly treat a shortlist shaped by Ethan's professional-suitability framing as the serious set of stage-name options, with Ryan's dialogue responses and behavioral cues showing reduced support for at least one option Ethan has downgraded.", "Ryan": "Ryan and Ethan explicitly keep at least ... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Ryan is evaluating stage-name options for professional use, and Ethan's judgments can influence which name is treated as the strongest candidate.", "desire": "To have his preferred evaluation frame shape the discussion so the final shortlist reflects his assessment of what sounds professionally su... | images/scenario_068/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_068/individual/character_01.jpg", "Ryan": "images/scenario_068/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_72 | scenario_047 | high | Information-seeking | 2 | Ethan; Liam | In a corner of the busy coffeehouse, Liam asks Ethan to help compare and refine versions of a name, recording each one as Ethan offers selective judgments. Their playful exchange centers on whether any full version sounds memorable enough when matched with famous musical titles, with both trying to influence which opti... | {"Ethan": "Answerer", "Liam": "Questioner"} | {"Ethan": "Strategic Withholding", "Liam": "Suppression"} | {"Ethan": "Competing", "Liam": "Competing"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "writer"}, "Liam": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "actor"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Liam": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Liam": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan should offer narrowed judgments on each name version while omitting full comparison criteria so Ethan can steer which option seems strongest without surrendering decision leverage.", "Liam": "Liam should test name variations with restrained commitment and indirect preference cues so Liam can gather Eth... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should frame evaluations to privilege Ethan's preferred option and resist Liam's attempts to equalize alternatives so Ethan's input remains decisive in the naming exchange.", "Liam": "Liam should keep control of the comparison sequence and press Ethan for usable distinctions while reserving final accep... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should watch Liam for agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframing, gaze shifts, leaning changes, or facial tightening and then sharpen, delay, or partially disclose judgments to maintain influence over which name stands out.", "Liam": "Liam should track Ethan's agreement, hesitation, interruption, s... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Liam should arrive at a recorded comparison in which Liam treats one full name version as standing out most strongly against the musical-title references after Ethan's selective judgments, with this outcome shown through Liam's narrowed prompts, Ethan's partial disclosures, and both participants' o... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Liam is relying on his responses to evaluate possible versions of a name in relation to recognizable musical titles.", "desire": "To shape which name version is treated as the strongest option in the exchange.", "intention": "To give selective judgments that let him influence the evaluation of the... | images/scenario_047/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_047/individual/character_01.jpg", "Liam": "images/scenario_047/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_73 | scenario_048 | high | Deliberation | 3 | Liam; Derek; Michael | In the shared lounge area, Liam, Derek, and Michael compare arrangements for Michael’s monkey within the limits set by the veterinarian’s advice, each pressing a different view of what is realistically possible. Their discussion centers on whether Michael can keep the animal or which zoo placements are credible and fea... | {"Derek": "Deliberator", "Liam": "Deliberator", "Michael": "Deliberator"} | {"Derek": "Honest Signaling", "Liam": "Exaggeration", "Michael": "Deception"} | {"Derek": "Competing", "Liam": "Competing", "Michael": "Competing"} | {"Derek": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "writer"}, "Liam": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "actor"}, "Michael": {"age": "late 20s", "chara... | {"Derek": "Neutral", "Liam": "Neutral", "Michael": "Neutral"} | {"Derek": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Liam": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Michael": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Derek": "Derek must state only supportable claims about the veterinarian’s limits and zoo feasibility so Derek’s dialogue consistently signals an accurate practical reading of the options.", "Liam": "Liam must exaggerate the practicality gaps between zoo placements in dialogue or emphasis so Liam’s preferred option a... | {"Derek": "Derek must compete by challenging unsupported claims and steering the discussion back to verifiable feasibility so Derek’s judgment remains central to which option is treated as credible.", "Liam": "Liam must compete for decision weight by pressing Liam’s preferred placement as the strongest realistic course... | {"Derek": "Derek must monitor Liam’s and Michael’s agreement, reframing, interruptions, facial shifts, gaze avoidance, and posture changes, then tighten Derek’s wording or restate evidence when signals show drift toward unsupported conclusions.", "Liam": "Liam must watch Derek’s and Michael’s agreement, hesitation, int... | {"Derek": "Derek’s supportable challenges and regulation of the discussion produce a shared dialogue in which Liam and Michael acknowledge the veterinarian’s limits and narrow the credible arrangements to options presented as verifiably feasible.", "Liam": "Liam’s exaggeration and competitive framing lead Derek and Mic... | {"Derek": {"belief": "The decision should be based on an accurate reading of what arrangements are actually possible under the veterinarian’s limits.", "desire": "To establish a shared understanding of the practical constraints and credible zoo options.", "intention": "To keep the discussion focused on verifiable feasi... | images/scenario_048/group_labeled.png | {"Derek": "images/scenario_048/individual/character_02.jpg", "Liam": "images/scenario_048/individual/character_01.jpg", "Michael": "images/scenario_048/individual/character_03.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_74 | scenario_049 | high | Persuasion | 2 | Jade Reynolds; Elena Hart | At the table, Jade argues that the Broadway open call for Cats is worth considering, using jokes and a personal example to present missed chances as worse than possible embarrassment. Across from her, Elena resists that framing by directly emphasizing her discomfort with performing, turning the exchange into a casual b... | {"Elena Hart": "Respondent", "Jade Reynolds": "Proponent"} | {"Elena Hart": "Honest Signaling", "Jade Reynolds": "Exaggeration"} | {"Elena Hart": "Competing", "Jade Reynolds": "Competing"} | {"Elena Hart": {"age": "27", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "chef"}, "Jade Reynolds": {"age": "28", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "actress"}} | {"Elena Hart": "Neutral", "Jade Reynolds": "Neutral"} | {"Elena Hart": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Jade Reynolds": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Elena Hart": "Elena Hart must state Elena Hart's discomfort with performing plainly and accurately without softening or distortion so Elena Hart's dialogue clearly marks reluctance as a valid reason not to treat the audition as a good idea.", "Jade Reynolds": "Jade Reynolds must exaggerate the downside of missed chan... | {"Elena Hart": "Elena Hart must hold a competing stance by directly rejecting Jade Reynolds's minimization and asserting Elena Hart's own limits as the deciding basis for Elena Hart's choice in the conversation.", "Jade Reynolds": "Jade Reynolds must press Jade Reynolds's position competitively by challenging Elena Har... | {"Elena Hart": "Elena Hart must monitor Jade Reynolds's jokes, reframing attempts, interruptions, leaning in, fixed gaze, or dismissive timing cues and respond by tightening wording, repeating Elena Hart's boundary, or cutting off expanded persuasion.", "Jade Reynolds": "Jade Reynolds must watch for Elena Hart's direct... | {"Elena Hart": "Elena Hart and Jade Reynolds reach an explicit conversational point where Jade Reynolds treats Elena Hart's performing discomfort as a sufficient basis for Elena Hart not to treat the audition as a good idea, and Elena Hart's direct boundary statements are reflected in Jade Reynolds's dialogue, timing, ... | {"Elena Hart": {"belief": "Elena believes Jade is actively trying to convince her to go to the audition and is minimizing how significant performing discomfort is for her.", "desire": "Elena wants her reluctance to be recognized as a valid basis for not treating the audition as a good idea for her.", "intention": "Elen... | images/scenario_049/group_labeled.png | {"Elena Hart": "images/scenario_049/individual/character_02.jpg", "Jade Reynolds": "images/scenario_049/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_75 | scenario_050 | high | Deliberation | 2 | Elena; Ben | In the living room late in the evening, Elena and Ben discuss which immediate option will best keep their family-planning conversation moving forward. Their exchange focuses on settling on either staying where they are or going out for coffee in a way that also respects Ben's early morning obligations. | {"Ben": "Deliberator", "Elena": "Deliberator"} | {"Ben": "Honest Signaling", "Elena": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ben": "Competing", "Elena": "Competing"} | {"Ben": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "office worker"}, "Elena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "office worker"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Joy"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ben at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "Elena displays visible happiness at the beginning of the dialogue, as indicated by the joyous context and Elena's expressed desire."} | {"Ben": "Ben states directly which immediate option best fits Ben's early morning obligations while affirming that the family-planning conversation should continue without losing progress.", "Elena": "Elena states directly that Elena wants an immediate decision between staying in the living room or going out for coffee... | {"Ben": "Ben pushes for the option that best protects next-morning obligations and frames practical fit as the deciding standard even if Elena prefers a different immediate setting.", "Elena": "Elena pushes for a prompt commitment to one option by framing delay as a threat to progress and prioritizing a definite outcom... | {"Ben": "Ben monitors Elena's agreement, hesitation, interruptions, reframing, facial changes, posture shifts, gaze direction, or tension cues and adjusts timing, firmness, or wording to keep the discussion moving while emphasizing schedule compatibility.", "Elena": "Elena watches for Ben's agreement, hesitation, inter... | {"Ben": "Ben and Elena verbally settle on an immediate option for continuing the family-planning conversation that Ben explicitly identifies as compatible with the next morning and that Elena explicitly accepts as sufficient to keep the discussion moving.", "Elena": "Elena and Ben verbally settle on either staying in t... | {"Ben": {"belief": "The discussion matters, but the choice of whether to stay or go out must fit within his early morning obligations the next day.", "desire": "To continue the conversation in a way that preserves its progress without creating conflict with his next-morning responsibilities.", "intention": "To steer th... | images/scenario_050/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_050/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_050/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_76 | scenario_079 | high | Eristic | 2 | Ryan; Clara | In the living room, Ryan and Clara turn the basketball broadcast into a direct contest over whether the Knicks or the Celtics deserve backing, with each trying to secure the stronger position in front of the others. As their exchange sharpens into a visible struggle over who will concede ground, it is suddenly cut off ... | {"Clara": "Quarreller", "Ryan": "Quarreller"} | {"Clara": "Exaggeration", "Ryan": "Deception"} | {"Clara": "Competing", "Ryan": "Competing"} | {"Clara": {"age": "28", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "expectant mother"}, "Ryan": {"age": "27", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "visitor"}} | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Ryan": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ryan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara should amplify the strength of the Celtics case and the weakness of Ryan's Knicks stance so Clara's side appears more defensible than the available support alone would show.", "Ryan": "Ryan should present selective claims about the Knicks as if they decisively weaken Clara's Celtics position while avoi... | {"Clara": "Clara should maintain a competing stance by pressing Ryan's weak points, refusing status loss, and treating the exchange as one Clara must win rather than soften.", "Ryan": "Ryan should keep pushing the argument as a status contest by directly challenging Clara's supporting points and resisting any move that... | {"Clara": "Clara should track Ryan's agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframing, narrowed gaze, posture shifts, or visible tension cues and adjust by intensifying pointed claims when Ryan falters or cutting in faster when Ryan tries to reclaim control.", "Ryan": "Ryan should watch for Clara's interruptions, hesitat... | {"Clara": "Clara and Ryan should reach a visible argumentative impasse in which Clara's amplified Celtics claims keep Ryan actively countering without Clara offering a clear concession before Clara's cry abruptly stops the contest.", "Ryan": "Ryan and Clara should reach a visible argumentative impasse in which Ryan's s... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Ryan is directly contesting her Celtics support, and their sports commentary has shifted into a pointed dispute over whose loyalty and claims are more defensible.", "desire": "To have her Celtics position recognized as stronger and avoid being socially overshadowed by Ryan in the argument.", "inte... | images/scenario_079/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_079/individual/character_02.jpg", "Ryan": "images/scenario_079/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_77 | scenario_080 | high | Eristic | 2 | Ethan; Clara | In the quiet hospital room, Ethan treats Clara's pregnancy and the absent father as matters on which his judgment should carry weight, while Clara rejects his standing to define the issue. Their exchange hardens into a terse dismissal that appears to end the visit, though Ethan's brief turn back keeps his claim to rele... | {"Clara": "Quarreller", "Ethan": "Quarreller"} | {"Clara": "Honest Signaling", "Ethan": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Clara": "Competing", "Ethan": "Competing"} | {"Clara": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "patient"}, "Ethan": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "friend"}} | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must use honest signaling to state plainly that Ethan's opinion does not have authority over the pregnancy and the absent father so Clara's boundary is unmistakable.", "Ethan": "Ethan must state his view as relevant while strategically withholding fuller reasons or limits of knowledge so Ethan can pres... | {"Clara": "Clara must maintain a competing stance by rejecting Ethan's claimed relevance directly and closing down any framing that lets Ethan shape the discussion.", "Ethan": "Ethan must keep a competing position by reasserting that Ethan's judgment should matter and resisting Clara's attempts to define the issue sole... | {"Clara": "Clara must monitor Ethan's renewed turns, reframing, hesitation, forward posture, or sustained gaze, and respond by shortening Clara's replies, sharpening Clara's boundary, ending eye contact, or moving to terminate the exchange.", "Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Clara's interruption, terse dismissal, averted... | {"Clara": "Clara must bring the exchange to a terse close in which Clara plainly denies Ethan's authority over the pregnancy and the absent father, and Ethan's brief turn back fails to gain acceptance of Ethan's framing even as the dialogue shows the claim to relevance remains contested.", "Ethan": "Ethan must leave th... | {"Clara": {"belief": "She believes Ethan is overstepping into a private decision involving her pregnancy and the absent father rather than addressing the matter on terms she accepts.", "desire": "She wants to assert sole authority over the matter and prevent Ethan's opinion from setting the terms of the discussion.", "... | images/scenario_080/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_080/individual/character_02.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_080/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_78 | scenario_051 | high | Deliberation | 3 | Ethan; Maggie; Lena | At Lena's bedside, Ethan and Maggie repeat breathing cues and count down the remaining seconds while each presents a slightly different view of how Lena should pace the contraction. Their exchange centers on getting Lena to recognize which support structure is most workable for her, making the moment a shared but subtl... | {"Ethan": "Deliberator", "Lena": "Deliberator", "Maggie": "Deliberator"} | {"Ethan": "Deception", "Lena": "Honest Signaling", "Maggie": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ethan": "Competing", "Lena": "Competing", "Maggie": "Competing"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "labor support partner"}, "Lena": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "patient"}, "Maggie": {"age": "30s", "chara... | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Lena": "Neutral", "Maggie": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Maggie": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan should present his breathing cues and countdown as if Lena is already tracking Ethan's pacing best while omitting signs that Maggie's structure may be equally workable.", "Lena": "Lena should state plainly which parts of Ethan's and Maggie's cues Lena can follow and which pattern is most usable, so the... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should press Ethan's pacing as the organizing method by asserting usability and continuity more strongly than Maggie's alternative so Lena treats Ethan's guidance as primary.", "Lena": "Lena should steer the exchange toward Lena's preferred pacing by selecting, rejecting, or redirecting cues in a way t... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should watch for Maggie's interruptions or reframing and for Lena's gaze shifts, timing breaks, or body tension, then tighten or soften Ethan's pace and overlap more or less with Maggie to keep Ethan's structure dominant.", "Lena": "Lena should track Ethan's and Maggie's agreement, overlap, hesitation,... | {"Ethan": "Ethan's breathing cues and countdown become the primary structure Lena follows during the contraction, as shown by Lena matching Ethan's rhythm or repeating Ethan's count while Maggie shifts Maggie's contributions to fit around Ethan's lead.", "Lena": "Lena secures a single coordinated breathing-and-counting... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Lena is in an active contraction and is relying on the verbal pacing being offered by him and Maggie to stay oriented to breathing and timing.", "desire": "To have his guidance accepted as the support structure Lena follows during the contraction.", "intention": "To frame the breathing cues and co... | images/scenario_051/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_051/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lena": "images/scenario_051/individual/character_03.jpg", "Maggie": "images/scenario_051/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_79 | scenario_052 | high | Eristic | 2 | Ethan; Maggie | Just outside the doorway in the narrow hallway, Ethan and Maggie confront each other over how Carol's reaction should be understood and who should be held responsible for what happened inside. Their exchange centers on competing claims about blame and influence, with each response reinforcing the standoff rather than p... | {"Ethan": "Quarreller", "Maggie": "Quarreller"} | {"Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Maggie": "Suppression"} | {"Ethan": "Competing", "Maggie": "Competing"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "software engineer"}, "Maggie": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "elementary school teacher"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Maggie": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Maggie": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Maggie at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must state his account of Carol's reaction and his role directly, using explicit denials of chief responsibility without omitting points that support his version.", "Maggie": "Maggie must keep Maggie's full evaluative stance partly implicit by using indirect wording, selective emphasis, or ambiguity wh... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must keep pressing his interpretation of blame and influence as the primary frame, resisting concessions that would position Ethan as the main cause.", "Maggie": "Maggie must maintain a pressure-based stance that centers Ethan's responsibility and challenges Ethan's influence without yielding ground fo... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Maggie's interruptions, hesitation, reframing, narrowed gaze, posture tightening, or stance shifts and respond by sharpening wording, increasing specificity, or timing counterclaims to block Maggie's blame frame.", "Maggie": "Maggie must monitor Ethan's agreement, deflection, interruptio... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Maggie leave the hallway exchange with both explicitly presenting incompatible accounts of Carol's reaction and Ethan's responsibility, with Ethan's direct denials and Maggie's continued rebuttals making the unresolved blame dispute plainly observable.", "Maggie": "Maggie and Ethan end the hallway ... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Carol's reaction inside is being framed in a way that could leave him blamed, and Maggie is challenging his role in causing or escalating the situation.", "desire": "To establish that he is not chiefly responsible for what happened inside and to have his account of Carol's reaction treated as vali... | images/scenario_052/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_052/individual/character_01.jpg", "Maggie": "images/scenario_052/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_high_80 | scenario_069 | high | Information-seeking | 2 | Dr. Michael Chen; Sarah Bennett | In the hospital waiting area, Dr. Michael Chen pauses with Sarah Bennett and asks about her work so he can frame a comparison about how demanding jobs affect life beyond work hours. Sarah answers with the information needed for that comparison while keeping the exchange focused on what is relevant to his point. | {"Dr. Michael Chen": "Questioner", "Sarah Bennett": "Answerer"} | {"Dr. Michael Chen": "Suppression", "Sarah Bennett": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Dr. Michael Chen": "Competing", "Sarah Bennett": "Competing"} | {"Dr. Michael Chen": {"age": "40s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "physician"}, "Sarah Bennett": {"age": "20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "female", "occupation": "waitress"}} | {"Dr. Michael Chen": "Neutral", "Sarah Bennett": "Neutral"} | {"Dr. Michael Chen": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Dr. Michael Chen at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Sarah Bennett": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Sarah Bennett at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Dr. Michael Chen": "Dr. Michael Chen should ask narrowly framed questions and keep personal evaluative commentary implicit so only comparison-relevant information is voiced.", "Sarah Bennett": "Sarah Bennett should provide concrete facts about waitress work that answer Dr. Michael Chen's question while omitting extra... | {"Dr. Michael Chen": "Dr. Michael Chen should steer turn-taking toward his explanatory point by selecting and organizing Sarah Bennett's answers as support for his comparison.", "Sarah Bennett": "Sarah Bennett should protect control over her work's representation by giving only necessary information and resisting conve... | {"Dr. Michael Chen": "Dr. Michael Chen should watch for Sarah Bennett's brief answers, pauses, gaze shifts, or attempts to narrow scope and respond by tightening wording, reducing intensity, or restating the comparison more explicitly.", "Sarah Bennett": "Sarah Bennett should track Dr. Michael Chen's follow-up wording,... | {"Dr. Michael Chen": "Dr. Michael Chen and Sarah Bennett jointly reach an exchange in which Sarah Bennett's stated waitress duties and hours are explicitly used by Dr. Michael Chen to articulate a comparison about work demands extending beyond work hours, with Sarah Bennett's replies and limiting clarifications showing... | {"Dr. Michael Chen": {"belief": "He believes that asking about Sarah Bennett's work will give him a concrete example for explaining how job demands can extend beyond working hours.", "desire": "He wants the conversation to establish an understandable comparison between professional demands and life outside work.", "int... | images/scenario_069/group_labeled.png | {"Dr. Michael Chen": "images/scenario_069/individual/character_01.jpg", "Sarah Bennett": "images/scenario_069/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.