You need to agree to share your Hugging Face information to access this dataset

This repository is publicly accessible, but you have to accept the conditions to access its files and content.

Log in or Sign Up to review the conditions and access this dataset content.

decidable/responses

Per-sample predictions, one row per (respondent, item). Nothing is sampled: a respondent is scored by comparing log probabilities over the item's answer surface, so re-scoring is possible without re-querying anything.

One file per respondent, predictions/<name>.parquet. The name is the registry key in decidable, which pins the commit each file was produced from.

The single split is called runs because there is no train/test boundary here: a respondent either covered an item or it did not, and that is in the data. (all cannot be used — datasets reserves it for the union of splits.)

Row schema

Field Type Meaning
run_settings struct the respondent: model_id, revision, dtype, quantisation, interface, thinking
item_id, item_hash, prompt_hash string what was asked; joins to decidable-items
scoring_rule string single_token, first_token or full_label
scored bool false when the answer surface could not be separated
predicted string the surface with the highest score under scoring_rule
correct bool, nullable null exactly when scored is false
scores list log probability per entry of the item's surface, under scoring_rule
full_label_scores list whole-surface log probability, kept so a re-tokenised surface can be re-scored without a re-run
surface_tokens list tokens each surface occupied; this is what decides the rule
floored bool a log probability hit the provider's floor
response string, nullable raw text; null under logprob scoring, where nothing is sampled

correct is nullable on purpose: a collided or unavailable answer surface must never be recorded as a wrong answer. Coverage is reported, not silently scored.

Settings live in the row rather than in a side table because they are the thing that distinguishes respondents — fp16 and 4-bit weights of the same repo are not the same measurement, and a re-uploaded repo id is not the same weights.

Recipes

-- who has been measured
SELECT DISTINCT run_settings.model_id, run_settings.revision, run_settings.dtype
FROM 'predictions/*.parquet';

-- accuracy per respondent for one config
SELECT run_settings.model_id,
       avg(correct::INT) FILTER (WHERE scored) AS accuracy,
       count(*) FILTER (WHERE NOT scored)      AS unscored
FROM 'predictions/*.parquet'
WHERE starts_with(item_id, 'dala#')
GROUP BY 1 ORDER BY 2 DESC;

-- the item by respondent matrix a fit wants
SELECT item_id,
       run_settings.model_id || '@' || run_settings.dtype AS respondent,
       correct
FROM 'predictions/*.parquet' WHERE scored;
Downloads last month
19