Case Name stringlengths 11 235 | Input stringlengths 944 6.86k | Output stringlengths 11 196k | Label int64 0 1 | Count int64 176 118k | Decision_Count int64 7 37.8k | text stringlengths 1.43k 13.9k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Delhi Development Authority Vs. Bhola Nath Sharma by L.Rs. and Ors | Udit Narain Singh Malpaharia v.Additional Member, Board of Revenue.) A local authority for whom land is being acquired has a right to participate in the acquisition proceedings in the matter of determination of the amount of compensation while they are pending before the Collector and to adduce evidence in the said pro... | 1[ds]8. We are further of the view that delay in filing the special leave petitions deserves to be condoned because after having learnt about the impugned judgment, the concerned functionaries of the DDA took steps to collect the papers relating to the acquisition proceedings, sought opinion of theand the Solicitor Gen... | 1 | 9,317 | 721 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case to predict the court's ruling (favorably (1) or unfavorably (0)), and then expound on this prediction by highlighting and analyzing key textual elements from the proceeding.
### Input:
Udit Narain Singh Malpaharia v.Additional Member, Board of Revenue.) A local authority for whom land ... |
State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur Vs. Khandelwal (R. L.) | special qualification or skill for the efficient discharge of duties were laid down in Para. 164 of the award. In Para. 168, mention was made of certain categories described in various banks by such terms as junior assistants and senior assistants and classified by some banks as officers, It was held that the terms do ... | 1[ds]In Para. 168, mention was made of certain categories described in various banks by such terms as junior assistants and senior assistants and classified by some banks as officers, It was held that the terms do not, by themselves, indicate the nature of the work entrusted to them. Irrespective of their designation, ... | 1 | 2,049 | 856 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
special qualification or skill for the efficient discharge of duties were laid down in Para. 164 of the award. In ... |
NOY VALLESINA ENGINEERING SpA, (now known as Noy Ambiente S.p.a) Vs. JINDAL DRUGS LIMITED & ORS | Constitution Bench decision of this Court in P.S. Sathappan [P.S. Sathappan v. Andhra Bank Ltd., (2004) 11 SCC 672 ] , and the way the Constitution Bench understood and interpreted Mohindra Supply Co. [Union of India v. Mohindra Supply Co., AIR 1962 SC 256 ] would be clear from the following para 10 of the judgment: (P... | 1[ds]17. The decision in Bhatia (Supra n.8), and later, in Venture Global (Supra n.9), had ruled that resort to remedies under Part I of the Act can be made in respect of foreign awards, despite the clear dichotomy in the enactment between domestic awards (covered by Part I) and foreign awards (covered by Part II). Thi... | 1 | 13,956 | 3,891 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
Constitution Bench decision of this Court in P.S. Sathappan [P.S. Sathappan v. Andhra Bank Ltd., (2004) 11... |
M/s. Tata Engineering & Locomotive Company Limited Vs. N.K. Singh | Arijit Pasayat, J. Appellant calls in question legality of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Jharkhand High Court dismissing Letters Patent Appeal filed by the appellant. 2. Background facts as projected by appellant in a nutshell are as follows:The respondent who was working as Assistant Store Keeper, w... | 0[ds]10. We find that the Labour Court has found the inquiry to be fair and proper. The conduct highlighted by the management and established in inquiry was certainly of very grave nature. The Labour Court and the High Court have not found that misconduct was of any minor nature. On the contrary, the finding on facts t... | 0 | 1,042 | 159 | ### Instruction:
Predict the outcome of the case proceeding (1 for acceptance, 0 for rejection) and subsequently provide an explanation based on significant sentences in the proceeding.
### Input:
Arijit Pasayat, J. Appellant calls in question legality of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Jharkhand High... |
Randhir Shivajirao Naik & Anr Vs. Reserve Bank of India & Ors | notice and an affidavit to that effect may be filed in court by the next date. 6. Affidavits in Reply have been filed by all the Respondents. There is some discrepancy in the page numbering in the Court record. 7. The facts have been briefly noted in the order of 28th June 2021. Although we do not think a longer deline... | 1[ds]14. Nobody before us challenges these circulars, as indeed none can.15. Then, also in paragraph 8, the RBI has stated that instructions on reporting of information pertaining to Wilful Defaulters to RBI have been issued to Scheduled Co-operative Banks. This has been done by circulars dated 30th June 1999, 1st Augu... | 1 | 1,919 | 517 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
notice and an affidavit to that effect may be filed in court by the next date. 6. Affidavits in Reply have be... |
UNION OF INDIA Vs. LT. COL. KULDEEP YADAV | that the respondent had admitted all the allegations made against him in the show cause notice.27. The Tribunal was then impressed by the fact that the respondent had admitted the allegations made against him in the show cause notice. That conduct of the respondent, according to the Tribunal, unravelled the fair and ca... | 1[ds]22. It is no more res integra that the Tribunal is competent and empowered to interfere with the punishment awarded by the appropriate authority in any departmental action, on the ground that the same is excessive or disproportionate to the misconduct proved against the delinquent officer. However, exercise of tha... | 1 | 6,931 | 1,689 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
that the respondent had admitted all the allegations made against him in the show cause notice.27. The Tribunal wa... |
R. B. Bansilal Abirchand Milis Co. Ltd Vs. Labour Court Nagpur & Ors | order that the respondent could claim the benefit of S. 25-F it was obligatory on her to show that she had worked for 240 days in each year of service for which the claim was made. This Court found that the appellant had not taken the plea in its written statement and that there had been a lay-off or a lock-out and tha... | 0[ds]18. Section 25-C provides for the measure of compensation to be awarded in cases of lay-off of workers. Section 25-E of the Act however provides inter alia that no compensation shall be paid to a workman who has been laid-off if he does not present himself for work at the establishment at the appointed time during... | 0 | 5,544 | 1,373 | ### Instruction:
Determine the likely decision of the case (acceptance (1) or rejection (0)) and follow up with an explanation highlighting key sentences that support this prediction.
### Input:
order that the respondent could claim the benefit of S. 25-F it was obligatory on her to show that she had worked for 240 da... |
American Express Bank Limited Vs. Calcutta Steel Company, and Others | addressee who accepts it, can never, according to the principles of the law merchant, be liable otherwise than in their respective characters of drawer and acceptor." * At p. 778 the learned Law Lord further stated that "in other cases the character and liability of parties to a bill cannot be ascertained without the a... | 1[ds]7. It would thus be clear that the maker of a bill of exchange is the drawer; the person thereby directed to pay is called the drawee; after the drawee has signed his assent upon the bill he is called the acceptor. In the absence of any contract to the contrary, the acceptor, before maturity of a bill of exchange,... | 1 | 5,724 | 1,240 | ### Instruction:
Determine the likely decision of the case (acceptance (1) or rejection (0)) and follow up with an explanation highlighting key sentences that support this prediction.
### Input:
addressee who accepts it, can never, according to the principles of the law merchant, be liable otherwise than in their resp... |
Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. Dharmodayan & Co., Kerala | the High Court which is now under appeal before us and which is reported in [1974] 94 ITR 113 (Ker) was specifically brought to the notice of the court in the case of Indian Chamber of Commerce [1975] 101 ITR 796 (SC) and was criticised therein on applying the wrong test. It is urged on behalf of the revenue that as th... | 0[ds]It is undeniable that the law governing exemption from taxation of income derived from property held for religious or charitable purposes has undergone significant changes after the enactment of the Act of 1961But we are unable to accept the submission made by Mr. Ramamurthi on behalf of the revenue that by reason... | 0 | 4,786 | 1,382 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
the High Court which is now under appeal before us and which is reported in [1974] 94 ITR 113 (Ker) was... |
M/S Swastik Gases P.Ltd Vs. Indian Oil Corp.Ltd | had filed a suit at Vijayawada for recovery of dues from the petitioner while the petitioner had filed a suit for recovery of its alleged dues from the respondent in Calcutta High Court. One of the questions under consideration before this Court was whether the court at Vijayawada had no jurisdiction to entertain the s... | 0[ds]31. In the instant case, the appellant does not dispute that part of cause of action has arisen in Kolkata. What appellant says is that part of cause of action has also arisen in Jaipur and, therefore, Chief Justice of the Rajasthan High Court or the designate Judge has jurisdiction to consider the application mad... | 0 | 6,951 | 493 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
had filed a suit at Vijayawada for recovery of dues from the petitioner while the petitioner had filed ... |
Mrs. Hema Khattar Vs. Mr. Shiv Khera | party to the arbitration agreement or any person claiming through or under him, so applies not later than the date of submitting his first statement on the substance of the dispute, then, notwithstanding any judgment, decree or order of the Supreme Court or any Court, refer the parties to arbitration unless it finds th... | 1[ds]22. In view of the foregoing discussion, we are of the opinion that the appellants even though had different causes of action against the respondent but it was a continuity of the agreement dated 06.06.2009 and oral agreement is evidenced by the transcript of conversation between the appellant No. 2 and the respon... | 1 | 5,244 | 781 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
party to the arbitration agreement or any person claiming through or under him, so applies not later than th... |
Himani Alloys Ltd Vs. Tata Steel Ltd | for a sum of Rs.48,00,000/- in favour of the Registrar of the High Court. The intra appeal filed by the appellant was dismissed by the Division Bench of the High Court by judgment dated 22.9.2008. The said judgment is under challenge in this appeal by special leave. 4. Order 12 Rule 6 of the Code provides that where ad... | 1[ds]4. Order 12 Rule 6 of the Code provides that where admission of facts have been made in the pleadings or otherwise, whether oral or in writing, the Court may at any stage of the suit either on the application of any party or of its own motion and without waiting for the determination of any other question between ... | 1 | 1,306 | 1,062 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
for a sum of Rs.48,00,000/- in favour of the Registrar of the High Court. The intra appeal filed by the... |
Delhi Automobiles Private Limited Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax, Delhi | 1. The High Court was called upon to answer the following question "Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Additional District Judge was justified in directing the notified authority to accept the photostat copies of the counterfoils of the declaration in Form C of the turnover of Rs. 3, 59, 497.38 p. ... | 0[ds]7. In our view, in the first place, the assessee had not done all that it could; it could, and should, have preferred an appeal against the order of the learned Single Judge and persisted in his application for obtaining from the Official Liquidator duplicates of the C Form declarations, as required by Rule 12(3).... | 0 | 857 | 141 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
1. The High Court was called upon to answer the following question "Whether on the facts and circumstances ... |
Commr.Of Income Tax,Chennai Vs. M/S Alagendran Finance Ltd | read as a whole and the observations from the judgment have to be considered in the light of the questions which were before this Court. A decision of this Court takes its colour from the questions involved in the case in which it is rendered and while applying the decision to a later case, the courts must carefully tr... | 1[ds]9. We may at this juncture also notice the decision of this Court in Hind Wire Industries Ltd (supra) wherein the decision of this Court in V. Jaganmohan Rao v. CIT and CEPT [75 ITR 373] interpreting the provisions of Section 34 of the Act was reproduced which reads as under:"Section 34 in terms states that once t... | 1 | 4,242 | 3,517 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
read as a whole and the observations from the judgment have to be considered in the light of the questi... |
State Bank of Indore Vs. Commissioner of Payments & Others | appellants filed claim before the Commissioner. The claims were not just for the loans amount but also for interest on such loans. The Commissioner disallowed claims for loans given prior to the date Management was taken over. The Commissioner allowed claims only for loans given during the period the Management was tak... | 0[ds]7. A glance at the provisions of the Act, extracted hereinabove, shows that by virtue of Section 3 the right, title and interest of the owner in sick textile undertakings stands transferred to and vests in the Central Government. Section 4 provides for the effect of such vesting. It shows that the liability, which... | 0 | 3,358 | 365 | ### Instruction:
Predict the outcome of the case proceeding (1 for acceptance, 0 for rejection) and subsequently provide an explanation based on significant sentences in the proceeding.
### Input:
appellants filed claim before the Commissioner. The claims were not just for the loans amount but also for interest on suc... |
State Of Gujarat Vs. M/S. Kothari & Associates | filed on 25.1.1985, well after the limitation period of three years for even the final breach, as the various causes of action became time barred on 15.11.1979, 15.11.1980, 15.11.1981 and 15.11.1982 respectively. 10. There is another perspective on the method or manner in which limitation is to be computed. We have alr... | 1[ds]5. It would be pertinent to note that the issue of limitation was not pleaded as a ground before the Trial Court or the High Court. It was pressed for the first time in the course of oral arguments before the High Court. Nonetheless, it has been discussed in the impugned Order. The High Court, noting the contentio... | 1 | 3,482 | 397 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
filed on 25.1.1985, well after the limitation period of three years for even the final breach, as the v... |
THE GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR. ETC. ETC Vs. ARULMIGHU KALLALAGAR THIRUKOIL ALAGAR KOIL ETC. ETC | Secretary of State for India in Council through the Collector of Tinnevelly (1910) VI Indian Cases 691 and Mysore Balakrishna Rao v. The Secretary of State for India in Council (1915) XXIX M.L.J. 276 are not applicable to the facts of this case. 16. As the suit filed by the respondent was not dismissed as barred by lim... | 1[ds]13. While examining the contention of the Respondent that the Notification dated 11.10.1883 was issued without complying the requirements of Section 25 of the Act, the High Court committed an error in finding that there is no order of Reservation prior to 01.01.1883. The High Court referred to Exhibit B-6 which co... | 1 | 3,487 | 1,157 | ### Instruction:
Determine the likely decision of the case (acceptance (1) or rejection (0)) and follow up with an explanation highlighting key sentences that support this prediction.
### Input:
Secretary of State for India in Council through the Collector of Tinnevelly (1910) VI Indian Cases 691 and Mysore Balakrishn... |
SHRI H.D. SHRMA Vs. NORTHERN INDIA TEXTILE RES.ASSN | never paid to the appellant after August,1986 till 24.04.1987 (date of dismissal order). It is for this reason, the respondent contended that a sum of Rs.110/- is neither a wage and nor its component and nor the appellant has any right in law to claim such amount under the terms of his employment from the respondent. 2... | 0[ds]21. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties at length and on perusal of the record of the case, we are inclined to uphold the conclusion arrived at by the High Court but we do so on our reasoning given hereinbelow. In other words, though we uphold the conclusion arrived at by the High Court,but not the re... | 0 | 3,683 | 472 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
never paid to the appellant after August,1986 till 24.04.1987 (date of dismissal order). It is for this reas... |
State Of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Nurbudda Vally Refigerated Products &Ors | Government, the compensation payable shall in no case exceed-(a) the amount paid to Government by the local body less depreciation on buildings, if any, calculated in accordance with Paragraph 3.036 of Chapter III-"Buildings" for the period during which the property was in charge of the local body or the present value ... | 1[ds]12) A perusal of the order of the Nazul Officer shows that grant of NOC depends upon various factors and fulfillment of certain conditions. It is also not in dispute that the said officer is better equipped with to decide the application for grant of NOC. Undoubtedly, while deciding such an application, Nazul Offi... | 1 | 3,211 | 476 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
Government, the compensation payable shall in no case exceed-(a) the amount paid to Government by the l... |
Jaipur Udyog Limited Vs. Union of India & Others | charges, their application under S. 11A should have been dismissed. Sec . 41. so far as it is relevant for the present purpose, and Sec. 41A of the Act read as follows:"41. (1) Any complaint that a railway administration-(a) is contravening the provisions of Section 28, or(b) is charging for the carriage of any commodi... | 0[ds]The decision in Upper Doab Sugar Mills case (supra) does not arise for consideration in these appeals in which we are concerned only with the propriety of the two orders made under Section 41A of the Act. We do not also think that it would be more advantageous to the appellant if the matters were remanded to the T... | 0 | 1,601 | 81 | ### Instruction:
Speculate on the likely judgment (yes (1) or no (0) to the appeal) and then delve into the case proceeding to elucidate your prediction, focusing on critical sentences.
### Input:
charges, their application under S. 11A should have been dismissed. Sec . 41. so far as it is relevant for the present pur... |
Agra Electric Supply Co. Ltd Vs. The Labour Court, Meerut & Anr | other date to which hearing may be adjourned any party to the proceedings before the Labour Court or Tribunal or an Arbitrator is absent, though duly served with summons or having the notice of the date of hearing, the Labour Court or Tribunal or the Arbitrator, as the case may be, may proceed with the case in his abse... | 0[ds]11. We are not inclined to accept this contention of Mr. Gupte. As pointed out earlier by us, the order passed on February 22, 1964, is one dismissing the application as not having been prosecuted, for default of appearance of the second respondent. We will presently show that the order of February 22, 1964, canno... | 0 | 2,972 | 749 | ### Instruction:
Speculate on the likely judgment (yes (1) or no (0) to the appeal) and then delve into the case proceeding to elucidate your prediction, focusing on critical sentences.
### Input:
other date to which hearing may be adjourned any party to the proceedings before the Labour Court or Tribunal or an Arbitr... |
C. Mackertich Vs. Steuart & Company, Limited | that business is continuing. In answer to question No. 247 the witness said that the company had agency to deal in Austin cars. It is true that in the registered lease deed Ex. L and L (1) there is the description of the lessee as coach-builder. But it is obvious that the defendant company cannot claim to be holding un... | 1[ds]3. In support of these appeals it was submitted on behalf of the appellant that the High Court was in error in holding that the tenancy was for manufacturing purpose and that six months notice terminable with a year of tenancy was required.It was said that the onus of proving that the tenancy was for manufacturing... | 1 | 2,742 | 374 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case to predict the court's ruling (favorably (1) or unfavorably (0)), and then expound on this prediction by highlighting and analyzing key textual elements from the proceeding.
### Input:
that business is continuing. In answer to question No. 247 the witness said that the company had agen... |
AVTAR SINGH & ORS Vs. BIMLA DEVI & ORS | report corroborated the respondents/plaintiffs case that a staircase did not exist, or rather that it was in the stage of construction and was not completed. The report also bore out the plaintiffs allegation that holes had been made in the lintel of the roof. Furthermore, the dimensions of the chaubara, as found by th... | 1[ds]15. From an overall discussion of the evidence, it is apparent that undeniably Avtar Singhs possession - and perhaps even ownership - of the ground floor shop, could not be denied. The findings of the lower courts, therefore, based upon the registered documents cannot be faulted. However, both these courts ignored... | 1 | 3,078 | 1,040 | ### Instruction:
Project the court's decision (favor (1) or against (0) the appeal) based on the case proceeding, and subsequently give an in-depth explanation by analyzing relevant sentences from the document.
### Input:
report corroborated the respondents/plaintiffs case that a staircase did not exist, or rather tha... |
The Kamrup Industrial Gases Limited Vs. Union Of India | by the respondents Counsel, but his evidence on this topic has remained unshaken. Reference is made to Qs. 1044 to 1047 and Qs. 1370 to 1411 in cross-examination, put to the said A.N. Jha. The said A.N. Jha has proved that the said Blown off statements had been delivered by him personally to the responents employees at... | 1[ds]5. During the course of hearing it emerged, that the main reason for the Division Bench of the High Court in accepting the appeal was, that the appellant did not produce vital documents called for by the Diesel Locomotive Works, before the Arbitrator.We find substance in the contention advanced at the hands of the... | 1 | 3,400 | 708 | ### Instruction:
Estimate the outcome of the case (positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant) and then give a reasoned explanation by examining important sentences within the case documentation.
### Input:
by the respondents Counsel, but his evidence on this topic has remained unshaken. Reference is made to Qs. 1... |
Dilip N. Shroff Vs. Joint Commnr. Of Income Tax, Mumbai &Anr | be a genuine difference of opinion between two experts. The District Valuer, as noticed hereinbefore, having regard to the sale instances of 1979 wherein the value of the land was fixed at Rs.500/- per sq. ft., took notice of the fact that the valuation in terms of another sale instance of 19.10.1982 wherein the land w... | 1[ds]While considering as to whether the assessee has been able to discharge his burden, the assessing officer should not begin with the presumption that he isIncome Tax Officer had merely held that the assessee is guilty of furnishing of inaccurate particulars and not of concealment of income; which finding was arrive... | 1 | 14,445 | 160 | ### Instruction:
Speculate on the likely judgment (yes (1) or no (0) to the appeal) and then delve into the case proceeding to elucidate your prediction, focusing on critical sentences.
### Input:
be a genuine difference of opinion between two experts. The District Valuer, as noticed hereinbefore, having regard to the... |
Sudarshan Mineral Co. Ltd Vs. Union Of India & Anr | of Section 13.Sub-section (2) merely illustrates the nature of the power. It does not restrict the general power under sub-section (1). Even under clause (g) of sub-section (2) in particular the Rules may provide the terms on which and the conditions subject to which any mining lease may be granted or renewed. Sub-rule... | 0[ds]In our opinion none of he contentions put forward on behalf of the appellant is fit to be accepted and the appeal must fail5. As is well settled the power to make rules for regulating the grant of prospecting licenses and mining leases in respect of minerals and for purposes connected therewith is to be found in s... | 0 | 1,973 | 818 | ### Instruction:
Estimate the outcome of the case (positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant) and then give a reasoned explanation by examining important sentences within the case documentation.
### Input:
of Section 13.Sub-section (2) merely illustrates the nature of the power. It does not restrict the general p... |
Salem Cooperative Central Bank Limited Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras | case it could not fall within the accounting period July 1, 1944 to June 30, 1945, relevant to the A.Y. 1946-47. The Tribunal was of the opinion that the material date for the purpose of the fourth proviso to Section 10(2)(vii) was the date when the compensation was in fact received and that therefore the amount was as... | 0[ds]We find it difficult to agree with Smt. Janaki Ramachandran, learned counsel for the assessee that the High Court has exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 256 in making the above direction. As rightly observed by the High Court, if the Tribunal proceeds upon an assumption which is erroneous in law and refers a ... | 0 | 2,619 | 1,386 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
case it could not fall within the accounting period July 1, 1944 to June 30, 1945, relevant to the A.Y. 1946-... |
Marketing and Advertising Associates Private Limited Vs. Telerad Private Limited | show that a particular representation has been made and that a party other party acted upon that representation to his detriment. In the present case there is no representation whatever on the face of the consent terms or on the face of the order passed on the basis of the consent terms that Telerad Private limited wou... | 0[ds](7) AS far as the first of the four propositions formulated by Mr. Cooper is concerned, viz. , that rule 7 of the Companies (Court) Rules cannot authorize extension of time under an order made by consent of parties, he has relied strongly on a very recent decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Hukumchand v. ... | 0 | 12,969 | 6,324 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
show that a particular representation has been made and that a party other party acted upon that represent... |
Munja Praveen And Ors. Etc.Etc Vs. State Of Telangana And Ors. Etc.Etc | communities categories notified by the unit officers. The fall out vacancies if any due to relinquishment and non joining etc. of selected candidates shall be notified the next recruitment."11. According to us, the High Court has totally misconstrued the above G.O.Ms. The portion of the G.O.Ms. quoted above clearly lay... | 1[ds]8. We have heard learned senior counsel/learned counsel for the parties. At the outset, it may be noted that TSNPDCL had issued advertisement for filling up 164 vacancies, TSGENCO had issued advertisement for filling up 856 vacancies, TSSPDCL had issued advertisement for 201 vacancies and TSTRANSCO issued an adver... | 1 | 2,342 | 1,041 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
communities categories notified by the unit officers. The fall out vacancies if any due to relinquishment and non joining e... |
THE DIRECTOR GENERAL (ROAD DEVELOPMENT) NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Vs. AAM AADMI LOKMANCH & ORS | Harrison [1947 WN 191 : 63 TLR 484], Quinn v. Scott [(1965) 1 WLR 1004 : (1965) 2 All ER 588] and Mackie v. Dumbartonshire County Council [1927 WN 247] ). The duty of the owner/occupier of the premises by the side of the road whereon persons lawfully pass by, extends to guarding against what may happen just by the side... | 1[ds]33. A plain reading of the above provisions of the NGT Act would reveal that the tribunal possesses two kinds of power and jurisdiction: one, primary jurisdiction under Sections 14-15, and appellate jurisdiction under Section 16. Under Section 14, the NGT has the power to adjudicate upon disputes relating to civil... | 1 | 21,130 | 5,171 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
Harrison [1947 WN 191 : 63 TLR 484], Quinn v. Scott [(1965) 1 WLR 1004 : (1965) 2 All ER 588] and Mackie v. Dumbartonshire ... |
Mata Ram Vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd. and Ors | Pinaki Chandra Ghose and Rohinton Fali Nariman, JJ. 1. Leave granted. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 28.08.2015 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla whereby the High Court disposed of the FAO and modified the order passed by the Tribunal holding the insurer liable and giving the re... | 1[ds]7. We have gone through the material available on record including the terms and conditions mentioned in the insurance policy and the judgment of this court cited before us.8. After carefully perusing the records of the case and having regard to the fact that the insurance policy clearly shows that the insurance c... | 1 | 693 | 146 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
Pinaki Chandra Ghose and Rohinton Fali Nariman, JJ. 1. Leave granted. This appeal is directed against t... |
PRADEEP KUMAR SONTHALIA Vs. DHIRAJ PRASAD SAHU @ DHIRAJ SAHU & ANR | for penalty under Article 193, the act done by the elected member is not liable to be invalidated, but only in certain circumstances. One of them may be a case like the one on hand apart from cases falling foul of Article 188. But the position would have been different if Shri Amit Kumar Mahto had been convicted and se... | 0[ds]7. It is needless to say that the second question as formulated above would arise only if the answer to the first question is in the affirmative and not otherwise.8. Before proceeding further, we may point out that two ancillary issues namely (i) the non-joinder of the Election Commission of India as a party to th... | 0 | 9,413 | 4,862 | ### Instruction:
Speculate on the likely judgment (yes (1) or no (0) to the appeal) and then delve into the case proceeding to elucidate your prediction, focusing on critical sentences.
### Input:
for penalty under Article 193, the act done by the elected member is not liable to be invalidated, but only in certain cir... |
Dhiyan Singh & Another Vs. Jugal Kishore & Another | further forty years, and led Mt. Mohan Dei to believe that they also acknowledged her title to an absolute estate. We have no doubt that down to that time Kishan Lal was also estopped for the reasons given above. Had he questioned the award and reopened the dispute Mt. Mohan Dai would at once have sued and would then f... | 1[ds]8. We do not thinkthese passages qualify the operative portion of the award and are unable to agree with the learned Judges of the High Court who hold they do. In our opinion, the arbitrator was confused in his mind both as regards the facts as well as regards the law. His view of the law may have been wrong but t... | 1 | 4,228 | 783 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
further forty years, and led Mt. Mohan Dei to believe that they also acknowledged her title to an absolute estate. We hav... |
Dharam Dutt & Others Vs. Union of India & Others | of India, the Indian Council of World Affairs (ICWA, for short) had attained an International stature in connection with world affairs and the foreign policies of India vis-a-vis other countries. However, the activities of the Society, i.e. running the Institution, were being complained against by several persons all o... | 0[ds]48. It is well-settled that while dealing with a challenge to the constitutional validity of any legislation, the court should prima facie lean in favour of constitutional and should support the legislation, if it is possible to do so, on any reasonable ground and it is for the party who attacks the validity of th... | 0 | 2,509 | 1,418 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
of India, the Indian Council of World Affairs (ICWA, for short) had attained an International stature i... |
R. Ramakrishna Rao Vs. State of Kerala | the Act puts down as the minimum) after Hotel Brinda was opened in January 1959 and he was entitled to an exemption under the Act for a further period of five years from January 15, 1959. Lastly, he pleaded that if there was a doubt on all these points the matter could only be decided after the doubt was cleared by an ... | 0[ds]A part of the Scheme became operative from October 31, 1953; other portions came into operation on subsequent dates. It was not contended before us that the relevant parts of the Scheme were not in force. The Act applies to the whole of India and subject to the provisions contained in Section 16 of the Act it appl... | 0 | 1,541 | 522 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
the Act puts down as the minimum) after Hotel Brinda was opened in January 1959 and he was entitled to an exemptio... |
Krishna Devi Vs. Keshri Nandan | S. Abdul Nazeer, J.1. Parties in this appeal are close relatives. Krishna Devi, the Appellant/Plaintiff is the daughter of Dharam Singh. Mathura Prasad, the second Defendant was the brother of Dharam Singh and Keshri Nandan Respondent/Defendant No. 1 is the son of Mathura Prasad. The Appellant filed the suit O.S. No. 1... | 0[ds]4. Having heard the learned Counsel for the parties, we do not find any merit in this appeal. It cannot be held that the sale deed dated 11.07.1991 executed by Dharam Singh was obtained by fraud or by mis-representation. It is clear that when the sale deed was executed by Dharam Singh, he was having sound state of... | 0 | 502 | 194 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
S. Abdul Nazeer, J.1. Parties in this appeal are close relatives. Krishna Devi, the Appellant/Plaintiff... |
Hindustan Machines Tools Ltd Vs. P.N. Kashyap etc | computation thereof has been enumerated in the scheme which reads as under: "It has been decided to introduce a Voluntary Retirement Scheme for the employees of the Company as per the enclosed copy comprising of two parts viz., Scheme `A and Scheme `B. The scheme will be in operation from 1.4.1989 for a period of three... | 1[ds]10. It is seen that the Office Order No. 45 dated March 1, 1991 provides that the revised pay scales shall be effective from 1.1.1987 and will remain in force for the period of five years upto 31.12.1991. Clause 2.2 provides that the revised pay scales shall also be applicable on a pro rata basis to those categori... | 1 | 2,313 | 360 | ### Instruction:
Determine the likely decision of the case (acceptance (1) or rejection (0)) and follow up with an explanation highlighting key sentences that support this prediction.
### Input:
computation thereof has been enumerated in the scheme which reads as under: "It has been decided to introduce a Voluntary Re... |
Yogendra Kumar Jaiswal & Others Vs. State of Bihar & Others | an assumption to think that for any reason would mean any kind of subjective reason. In certain statutes or enactments the words for any reason can be attributed a wide meaning to subserve the legislative purpose. The term possible, in our considered opinion, may not be given the stature or status of impossible, which ... | 0[ds]38. In our considered opinion, the authorities cited by the learned counsel for the appellants do not render much assistance, for the introduction of a bill, as has been held in Mohd. Saeed Siddiqui (supra), comes within the concept of irregularity and it does come with the realm of substantiality. What has been h... | 0 | 47,343 | 3,145 | ### Instruction:
Project the court's decision (favor (1) or against (0) the appeal) based on the case proceeding, and subsequently give an in-depth explanation by analyzing relevant sentences from the document.
### Input:
an assumption to think that for any reason would mean any kind of subjective reason. In certain s... |
Glaxo Smithkline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Ors Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors | drug as also the maximum price which can be charged have direct relation with manufacture and also the date thereof. The wrapper/foil/containers in which the drug is marketed contains several informations for the general public; one of them being the date of manufacture and the retail price. Various other informations ... | 1[ds]8. Having heard learned Counsel for the parties, the point with which we are concerned is in a very narrow compass. If paragraph 28, which is set out hereinabove; is perused, it is clear that the exemption relates to drug manufacturing units or classes of such units. The very exemption order which has also been se... | 1 | 3,279 | 527 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
drug as also the maximum price which can be charged have direct relation with manufacture and also the date thereof. The ... |
Alok Kaushik Vs. Mrs Bhuvaneshwari Ramanathan and Others | professional and the expenses shall constitute insolvency resolution process costs. Explanation.– For the purposes of this regulation, expenses include the fee to be paid to the resolution professional, fee to be paid to insolvency professional entity, if any, and fee to be paid to professionals, if any, and other expe... | 1[ds]18. Regulation 30(A) would not apply specifically to the present situation, since it deals with a case where an application is withdrawn under Section 12A of the IBC. The appellant is justified in contending that there must be a forum within the ambit and purview of the IBC which has the jurisdiction to make a det... | 1 | 2,785 | 793 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
professional and the expenses shall constitute insolvency resolution process costs. Explanation.– For t... |
Lajwanti Vs. Lal Chand And Ors | the Act did not apply to involuntary dismantling of factories and that the issue raised by the Subordinate Judge in this connection did not arise but in fact it had been decided against the landlord by the High Court in Revision. According to him, the order of the High Court went to show that S. 3 of Act XX of 1948 cov... | 1[ds]11. In our opinion there was no final order about the inexecutability of the decree on the first application for execution which was consigned to the record room by order dated July 25, 1953. Further, the judgment of the learned single judge of the Punjab High Court dated July 13, 1955 did not decide the question ... | 1 | 2,185 | 584 | ### Instruction:
Hypothesize the court's verdict (affirmation (1) or negation (0) of the appeal), and then clarify this hypothesis by interpreting significant sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
the Act did not apply to involuntary dismantling of factories and that the issue raised by the Subordinate Judge ... |
M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India & Others | not comply with BS-IV emission norms would be prohibited. It did not do so to enable all concerned, particularly the auto industry and marketing strategists to gradually manage their affairs rather than subject them to a sudden future shock. The scheme of a gradual phase-out is now sought to be perverted through a lite... | 1[ds]In other words, we take it that the Government was and issupporting the reduction of vehicular pollution by controlling the emission norms and complying with the Bharat Stage standards keeping in view the auto fuel policy and the Report of the Expert Committee referred to by the Parliamentary Standing Committee.In... | 1 | 6,983 | 1,856 | ### Instruction:
Determine the likely decision of the case (acceptance (1) or rejection (0)) and follow up with an explanation highlighting key sentences that support this prediction.
### Input:
not comply with BS-IV emission norms would be prohibited. It did not do so to enable all concerned, particularly the auto in... |
Ketan V. Parekh Vs. Special Director,Dir.Of Enforcement&Anr | be allowed to indulge in forum shopping. It has not at all surprised us that after having made a prayer that the writ petitions filed by them be treated as appeals under Section 35, two of the appellants filed applications for recall of that order. No doubt, the learned Single Judge accepted their prayer and the Divisi... | 0[ds]A careful reading of the above reproduced averments shows that there was not even a whisper in the applications field by the appellants that they had been prosecuting remedy before a wrong forum, i.e. the Delhi High Court with due diligence and in good faith. Not only this, the prayer made in the applications was ... | 0 | 10,862 | 1,112 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
be allowed to indulge in forum shopping. It has not at all surprised us that after having made a prayer... |
Murarka Radhey Shyam Ram Kumar Vs. Roop Singh Rathore & Others | Having regard to the provisions of Part VI of the Act, we are of the view that the word "copy" does not mean an absolutely exact copy. It means a copy so true that nobody can by any possibility misunderstand it. The test whether the copy is a true one is whether any variation from the original is calculated to mislead ... | 0[ds]Section 82 then provided aspetitioner shall join as respondents to his petition all the candidates who were duly nominated at the election other than himself if he was so(4) of S. 90 then provided that notwithstanding anything contained in S. 85, the tribunal may dismiss an election petition which does not comply ... | 0 | 5,636 | 1,045 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
Having regard to the provisions of Part VI of the Act, we are of the view that the word "copy" does not mean an absolutely ... |
Ravi Paul Vs. Union Of India | any provision in Rule 8(b) which enables an Army Officer or a re-employed Army Officer to count his Army service for the purpose of seniority in the CRPF. We are, therefore, unable to uphold the decision of Delhi High Court in U. B. S. Teotia and others v. Union of India and others (supra). For the same reasons the obs... | 0[ds]22. It would thus appear that Rule 8(b)(i) of the CRPF Rules only governs the seniority as between Army Officers inter se, Army Officers and re-employed Army Officers inter se, Indian Police Services Officers inter se, and non-Army and Army Officers of equivalent rank inter se. The expression ``rank in this Rule m... | 0 | 7,195 | 1,301 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
any provision in Rule 8(b) which enables an Army Officer or a re-employed Army Officer to count his Army s... |
Roop Chand Vs. State of Punjab & Another | or disposed of by such officer and may pass such order in reference thereto as it thinks fit. Provided that no order, scheme or repartition shall be varied or reversed without giving the parties interested notice to appear and opportunity to be heard except in cases where the State Government is satisfied that the proc... | 1[ds]We think that this is the correct position, and we wish to make it clear that we are not basing ourselves on the concession made by the learned Advocate- General. We feel no doubt that an order passed by an officer of the Government cannot be an order passed by the Government itself.The question then arises, when ... | 1 | 7,921 | 1,852 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
or disposed of by such officer and may pass such order in reference thereto as it thinks fit. Provided that no order, schem... |
Babu Varghese Vs. Bar Council Of Kerala | members was obtained by 27-1-1997 which is the date on which the term of the Kerala Bar Council expired. Since the majority of the members had not expressed their approval by that date in favour of the resolution, no "action" was taken. It was clearly a case of abandonment. The other essential requirements of Rule 6 we... | 1[ds]19. Since in the instant case a resolution for extension of the term of the Kerala Bar Council was sought to be passed by the process of circulation as provided by Rule 6 and the High Court has found it to have been validly done, it was this Rule which constituted the focal point of debate by both the sides in thi... | 1 | 6,262 | 1,299 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
members was obtained by 27-1-1997 which is the date on which the term of the Kerala Bar Council expired. Since the majority... |
The State Of Uttar Pradeshand Others Vs. H. H. Maharaja Brijendra Singh | been held by the owner thereof under a purchase made before the first day of April, 1948, but after the first day of September, 1939, by a registered document, or a decree for pre-emption between the aforesaid dates, the compensation shall be the price actually paid by the purchaser or the amount on payment of which he... | 1[ds]9. In view of the judgment of this Court in Dhirubha Devisingh Gohils case, 1955-1 SCR 691 : ( (S) AIR 1955 SC 47 )the ground of unconstitutionality based on the contravention of S. 299 of the Government of India Act would not be available to the respondent. But it was argued on behalf of the respondent that the ... | 1 | 1,889 | 209 | ### Instruction:
Hypothesize the court's verdict (affirmation (1) or negation (0) of the appeal), and then clarify this hypothesis by interpreting significant sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
been held by the owner thereof under a purchase made before the first day of April, 1948, but after the first day... |
AIR INDIA EXPRESS LTD Vs. CAPT. GURDARSHAN KAUR SANDHU | however, the administration had made arrangements acting on his resignation or letter of retirement to make other employee available for his job, that would be another matter. 12. In the light of the aforementioned principles the issue whether the respondent could have withdrawn her letter of resignation depends upon a... | 1[ds]After the respondent was not allowed to join her duties, it appears that she was employed as a pilot with Jet Airways for some time. However, with the closing of operations of Jet Airways, she is not presently holding any position as pilot in any airline11. It is thus well settled that normally, until the resignat... | 1 | 7,952 | 745 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
however, the administration had made arrangements acting on his resignation or letter of retirement to make o... |
State Of West Bengal & Ors Vs. Washi Ahmed Etc | sealed containers and the only question which, therefore, requires to be considered is whether green ginger can be regarded as vegetable commonly known as "sabji, tarkari or sak". Now, the word "vegetable" is not defined in the Act but it is well-settled as a result of several decisions of this Court of which we may me... | 0[ds]It is interesting to note that the same principle of construction in relating to words used in a taxing statute has also been adopted in English, Canadian and American courts. Pollock, B., pointed out in Grenfellv. Inland Revenue Commissioners ((1876) 1 Ex. D. 242 at248.) that"if a statute contains language which ... | 0 | 1,605 | 561 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
sealed containers and the only question which, therefore, requires to be considered is whether green ginger can be regarded... |
Anandji Haridas & Co. Pvt. Ltd Vs. Engineering Mazdoor Sangh & Anr | Court of Bombay. The High Court held that the Company being an Industrial Company, was liable to pay tax under the Finance Act, 1966 at the rate of 55% only on its total income after deduction depreciation. Therefore, it could not claim deduction at a rate higher than 55% in calculating the available surplus. In the re... | 0[ds]are afraid what the Finance Minister said in his speech cannot be imported into this case and used for the construction of Clause (e) of Section 7. The language of that provision is manifestly clear and unequivocal. It has to be construed as it stands, according to its plain grammatical sense without addition or d... | 0 | 1,605 | 395 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
Court of Bombay. The High Court held that the Company being an Industrial Company, was liable to pay tax under the Finance ... |
Himangni Enterprises Vs. Kamaljeet Singh Ahluwalia | of the Arbitration Act, 1940 contending therein that since the "leave and license" agreement contained an arbitration clause for resolving all kinds of disputes arising between the parties in relation to the "leave and license" agreement and the disputes had arisen between the parties in relation to the "leave and lice... | 0[ds]17. Having heard learned senior counsel for the parties at length and on perusal of the record of the case, we find no merit in the appeal.18. In our considered opinion, the question involved in the appeal remains no longer res integra and stands answered by two decisions of this Court in Natraj Studios (P) Ltd. v... | 0 | 2,409 | 573 | ### Instruction:
Predict the outcome of the case proceeding (1 for acceptance, 0 for rejection) and subsequently provide an explanation based on significant sentences in the proceeding.
### Input:
of the Arbitration Act, 1940 contending therein that since the "leave and license" agreement contained an arbitration clau... |
Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Madras Vs. Mahalakshmi Textile Mills | fitted with rubber aprons to the spinning machinery, removal of ring-frames from certain existing parts, introduction, inter alia, of ball-bearing jockey-pulleys for converting the original band-drivers to tape-drivers and other additions and alterations in the drafting mechanism. 2. The Income-tax Officer disallowed t... | 0[ds]Counsel for the Commissioner has not challenged these findings and the answer to the second question recorded in the affirmative by the High Court must be acceptedBy the first question the jurisdiction of the Tribunal to allow a plea inconsistent with the plea raised before the Departmental authorities is canvasse... | 0 | 1,187 | 228 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
fitted with rubber aprons to the spinning machinery, removal of ring-frames from certain existing parts, int... |
New Delhi Municipal Committee Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India & Others | any time and robs that power of its meaningful content. We are clear that the Full Bench is wrong in its conclusion that the "expression at any time in Section 67.. . . . has reference only to the point of time when the list can be amended". 16. We may in passing observe, though that aspect of the matter ceases to have... | 1[ds]In the instant case, a part of the basement is alleged to have escaped assessment and if that be true, we are unable to understand that the assessee, the LIC here, could in face of Section 67 raise a contention that the assessment lists of past years, though faulty, cannot now be corrected. The Municipal Committee... | 1 | 4,637 | 2,179 | ### Instruction:
Predict the outcome of the case proceeding (1 for acceptance, 0 for rejection) and subsequently provide an explanation based on significant sentences in the proceeding.
### Input:
any time and robs that power of its meaningful content. We are clear that the Full Bench is wrong in its conclusion that t... |
Baidya Nath Mandi Vs. State of West Bengal & Others | Khanna, J. 1. This is a petition for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus by Baidya Nath Mandi, who has been ordered to be detained under Section 3 of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act. 2. No return in opposition to the petition has been filed, but Mr. Chatterjee on behalf of the respondents has at the hearin... | 1[ds]3. We find that the facts of the present case have a close similarity to those of Chotka Hembram v. State of West Bengal, W. P No. 841 of 1973, D/3 = (reported in AIR 1974 SC 432 = 1974 Cri LJ 449), wherein upon similar facts we quashed the order for the detention of the detenu. Following the aforesaid decision,... | 1 | 364 | 93 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
Khanna, J. 1. This is a petition for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus by Baidya Nath Mandi, who has been ordered to ... |
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. A. R. Adaikappa Chettiar and Others | 1. These appeals are preferred by the Revenue against the decision of the Madras High Court. The question that was referred by the Tribunal under section 66(1) of Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, Was : "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in deleting the addit... | 0[ds]The question has to be answered with reference to definition of income in section 2(6C) of the IndianAct, 1922. The definition includes several items. The onlywhich is relevant for the present purpose is(iii) which read thusii) the value of any benefit or perquisite, whether convertible into money or not, obtained... | 0 | 557 | 332 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
1. These appeals are preferred by the Revenue against the decision of the Madras High Court. The question that was referred... |
Gurdayal Singh Fiji Vs. State of Punjab and Others | AMARENDRA NATH SEN, J. 1. Gurdayal Singh Fiji, a member of the Punjab Provincial Civil Service, has presented this writ petition in person and he has argued his own case in person. The main grievance of the Petitioner in this writ petition appears to be against the non-inclusion of his name in the I.A.S. Select List. 2... | 0[ds]In view of the grievance made by the Petitioner as to non-inclusion of his name in the Select List, this Court by an order(l) passed on 9.3.1979 directed the I. A. S. Selection Committee to hold a special meeting to consider the question of inclusion of the name of the Petitioner in the Select List. Pursuant to th... | 0 | 684 | 466 | ### Instruction:
Speculate on the likely judgment (yes (1) or no (0) to the appeal) and then delve into the case proceeding to elucidate your prediction, focusing on critical sentences.
### Input:
AMARENDRA NATH SEN, J. 1. Gurdayal Singh Fiji, a member of the Punjab Provincial Civil Service, has presented this writ pe... |
Ahmedabad Advance Mills Limited, Mihir Textile Limited Vs. Collector of Customs, Bombay | Counsel for the appellant invited our attention to a letter which appellant has addressed to "Ministry of Industry, Udyog Bhawan, Maulana Azad Road, New Delhi" as proof of such application. Learned Additional Solicitor General contended that the said letter could not be treated as the application contemplated in the pr... | 0[ds]That fact is not disputed before us and as the appellants were aware of position they choose to pay full Customs duty for making the clearance. Learned counsel contended that the importer is not to be blamed fore with the conditions prescribed in the entry because all what should have been done by the m and what r... | 0 | 2,216 | 481 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
Counsel for the appellant invited our attention to a letter which appellant has addressed to "Ministry of ... |
Dunichand Hakim And Others Vs. Deputy Commissioner (Deputy Custodian Evacuee Property | is granted for a definite period and it is only fair to give the lessee a notice before his lease is terminated before the expiry of the stipulated period, whereas the allottee of land under the quasi permanent settlement stands on a different footing. Be that as it may, the question seems to be academical in the prese... | 0[ds]The various evacuee property Ordinance passed by the Central or the State Government from time to time which were eventually replaced by the Central Act No. XXXI of 1950, further confirm that the policy underlying the legislation was to provide for the administration of evacuee property for the time being and to m... | 0 | 3,009 | 668 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
is granted for a definite period and it is only fair to give the lessee a notice before his lease is termina... |
Khedut Sahakari Ginning & Pressing Societyltd Vs. State Of Gujarat | again is an authority given by the members to the Society.Bye-law 55 provides :"If it is found necessary and beneficial to sell goods which may be in stock by only other system which may be having connection with the forward market except the hedge system described in the above clause the managing committee can sell go... | 1[ds]14. This bye-law clearly indicates that the members of the Society are merely entrusting their goods to the Society and not selling them to the Society. That is made further clear by the fact that the Society may advance loans upto 75 per cent of the estimated value of the goods entrusted to it on the security of ... | 1 | 4,209 | 1,536 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
again is an authority given by the members to the Society.Bye-law 55 provides :"If it is found necessar... |
K.V. ANIL MITHRA & ANR Vs. SREE SANKARACHARYA UNIVERSITY OF SANSKRIT & ANR | Thus when he cannot claim regularisation and he has no right to continue even as a daily- wage worker, no useful purpose is going to be served in reinstating such a workman and he can be given monetary compensation by the Court itself inasmuch as if he is terminated again after reinstatement, he would receive monetary ... | 1[ds]20. It is an admitted case of the parties that Act 1947 is applicable on the 1st respondent-University and they are under an obligation to comply with the provisions of the Act 1947. It is also admitted that the 1st respondent is the employer as defined under Section 2(g) and the dispute which was raised is an ind... | 1 | 7,852 | 3,695 | ### Instruction:
Project the court's decision (favor (1) or against (0) the appeal) based on the case proceeding, and subsequently give an in-depth explanation by analyzing relevant sentences from the document.
### Input:
Thus when he cannot claim regularisation and he has no right to continue even as a daily- wage wo... |
Escorts Ltd Vs. Universal Tractor Holding Llc | award by the foreign Court was obtained, the award could not be executed in India. He relied upon Section 9 of the Federal Arbitration Act of U.S. which reads as follows: “Award of arbitrators; confirmation; jurisdiction; procedureIf the parties in their agreement have agreed that a judgment of the court shall be enter... | 0[ds]We have noted the submissions of both the counsel appearing for the parties. It is also material to note that even as per the requirement of the US Law, a notice of three months is required to be given in case a party does not want the award to be enforced. In the instant case, paragraph 7 of the consent order cle... | 0 | 1,582 | 145 | ### Instruction:
Project the court's decision (favor (1) or against (0) the appeal) based on the case proceeding, and subsequently give an in-depth explanation by analyzing relevant sentences from the document.
### Input:
award by the foreign Court was obtained, the award could not be executed in India. He relied upon... |
Swadeshi Cotton Mills Company Limited Vs. Government of U.P. and Others | Hegde, J. 1. This is an appeal by special leave. It is directed against the decision of the Allahabad High Court in a writ petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution. The petitioner was assessed to tax under the U.P. Sales-Tax Act some time in 1949 in respect of the assessment years 1948-49 and 1949-50. He did not go ... | 0[ds]3. We do not think that in this case it is necessary for us to consider whether Art. 226 can be used for challenging the validity of the orders passed prior to January 26, 1950. But we are in agreement with the High Court on the other two grounds. As mentioned earlier, the impugned assessments were made in 2949. T... | 0 | 611 | 342 | ### Instruction:
Project the court's decision (favor (1) or against (0) the appeal) based on the case proceeding, and subsequently give an in-depth explanation by analyzing relevant sentences from the document.
### Input:
Hegde, J. 1. This is an appeal by special leave. It is directed against the decision of the Allah... |
Shibban Lal Saksena Vs. The State Of Uttar Pradeshand Others | is argued in the first place that from the grounds served upon the petitioner under Section 7 of the P. D. Act, it appears clear that the grounds which weighed with the detaining authority in depriving the petitioner of his liberty are that his activities were in the first place prejudicial to the maintenance of suppli... | 1[ds]5. It is argued in the first place that from the grounds served upon the petitioner under Section 7 of the P. D. Act, it appears clear that the grounds which weighed with the detaining authority in depriving the petitioner of his liberty are that his activities were in the first place prejudicial to the maintenanc... | 1 | 1,666 | 525 | ### Instruction:
Estimate the outcome of the case (positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant) and then give a reasoned explanation by examining important sentences within the case documentation.
### Input:
is argued in the first place that from the grounds served upon the petitioner under Section 7 of the P. D. A... |
State Of A.P. Vs. T. Yadagiri Reddy | moto action and put the clock back, insofar as, the orders passed by the Tribunal in case of respondents under the Ceiling Act, as also in respect of the Certificates issued under Section 38-B are concerned. We do not see as to how we would order a suo moto action. The cases are entirely different cases. In this case, ... | 0[ds]The observations are extremely fitting in the present case. Here also, after the Certificates have been issued, 25 long years have elapsed. The rights of the parties have already been crystallized. Not only this, but, it is the report of Shri Rao that the said lands have now been converted and sold for to as many ... | 0 | 9,876 | 204 | ### Instruction:
Project the court's decision (favor (1) or against (0) the appeal) based on the case proceeding, and subsequently give an in-depth explanation by analyzing relevant sentences from the document.
### Input:
moto action and put the clock back, insofar as, the orders passed by the Tribunal in case of resp... |
The Board of Trustee of The Port of Mumbai Vs. New India Assurance Company Limited | not to those tenants, who were not enjoying such protection. In paragraph Nos.14, 17 and 18 of the said Judgment, it was held as follows,14. Pertinently, the relevant provisions of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956, and West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997, exclude premises belonging to the Central Governmen... | 1[ds]8. In my considered opinion, as the entire controversy in this case revolves around the law laid down by the Honble Apex Court in the case of Suhas H. Pophale Vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd (Supra), it would be useful to consider the facts of that case and the legal position discussed therein, in detail, in order ... | 1 | 6,859 | 2,325 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case to predict the court's ruling (favorably (1) or unfavorably (0)), and then expound on this prediction by highlighting and analyzing key textual elements from the proceeding.
### Input:
not to those tenants, who were not enjoying such protection. In paragraph Nos.14, 17 and 18 of the sa... |
Girdharilal Bansidhar Vs. Union Of India | some of the items in the Hand-book. It might very well be that this feature might be explained on the ground of the specification being by way of abundant caution, or possibly because in them the component parts might have an independent use other than as components of the articles specified. It appears to us that it d... | 0[ds]It is, no doubt, true that in some cases component parts are specifically included in some of the items in the Hand-book. It might very well be that this feature might be explained on the ground of the specification being by way of abundant caution, or possibly because in them the component parts might have an ind... | 0 | 2,754 | 902 | ### Instruction:
Project the court's decision (favor (1) or against (0) the appeal) based on the case proceeding, and subsequently give an in-depth explanation by analyzing relevant sentences from the document.
### Input:
some of the items in the Hand-book. It might very well be that this feature might be explained on... |
Railway Board and Others Vs. P.R. Subramaniyam and Others | managers of all Indian Railways and other authorities. The subject in this letter was "upgrading of posts". After reviewing their earlier decisions the Railway Board decided to make certain changes in the distribution of posts in the higher grades. As a provisional measure, since the final implementation of the orders ... | 1[ds]9. The Prefactory Note of the Indian Railway Establishment Manual which contains the above rule says : "It must be noted that the provisions of this Manual do not supersede the rules contained in any of the Indian Railway Codes in a case of conflict the latter should prevail. This manual may not be referred to as ... | 1 | 1,846 | 253 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
managers of all Indian Railways and other authorities. The subject in this letter was "upgrading of posts". A... |
M/S. Rollatainers Ltd Vs. Commnr. Of Central Excise, Delhi | factory. The ground plan of the paper board factory prior to May, 1998, showed shed no.3 as a godown for storage of its raw material, namely waste paper. Thereafter, the ground plan was amended in May, 1998, to show the specialty paper factory in shed no.3 for storing the finished goods manufactured at Dharuhera and cl... | 1[ds]8. Simply because both the factories are in the same premises that does not lead to the inference that both the factories are one and the same. In the present case, from the facts it is apparent that there is no commonality of the purpose, both the factories have a separate entrance, there is a passage in between ... | 1 | 1,405 | 552 | ### Instruction:
Predict the outcome of the case proceeding (1 for acceptance, 0 for rejection) and subsequently provide an explanation based on significant sentences in the proceeding.
### Input:
factory. The ground plan of the paper board factory prior to May, 1998, showed shed no.3 as a godown for storage of its ra... |
Collector of Central Excise, Pune Vs. Philips India Ltd | advertisement incurred by the dealers on behalf of the assessee" * 2. The learned counsel for the appellant drew attention to the judgment of a Division Bench of the High Court at Madras in Standard Electric Appliances v. Supdt. of Central Excise [ (Mad)]. The Court said that it was common knowledge that when a consume... | 1[ds]5. It seems to us clear that the advertisement which the dealer was required to make at its own cost benefited in equal degree the appellant and the dealer and that for this reason the cost of such advertisement was borne half and half by the appellant and the dealer. Making a deduction out of the trade discount o... | 1 | 1,546 | 237 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
advertisement incurred by the dealers on behalf of the assessee" * 2. The learned counsel for the appellant drew attention ... |
New India Assurance Co.Ltd Vs. Satpal Singh Muchal | Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J. 1. Leave granted.2. Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as the ‘National Commission) dismissing the revision petition filed by the appellant. Order passed by the State Commission, Madhya Pradesh was under ... | 1[ds]8. The basic stand of the appellant was that there was concealment of the factum of ailment to the kidney when the first application for insurance cover was made. Additionally the effect of clause 5.9 has not been considered.9. Reference was made by learned counsel for the appellant to the letter of the respondent... | 1 | 959 | 238 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J. 1. Leave granted.2. Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by the National C... |
Madras Refineries Ltd Vs. Controlling Revenue Authority, Board Ofrevenue, Madras | The Deed of Trust and Mortgage was therefore clearly the principal or the primary security and could not be said to be a "collateral agreement". The parties in fact clearly stated in Article I, section 1.01 of the Deed of Trust and Mortgage as follows, --"Collateral Agreements:The term "Collateral Agreements" shall mea... | 0[ds]It is true that it has been stated in the Guarantee Agreement that the President of India, as the guarantor, unconditionally guaranteed "has primary obligor and not as surety merely, the due and punctual payment from time to time" of the principal as well as the interest etc. stated in the agreement. And it was fo... | 0 | 2,994 | 874 | ### Instruction:
Hypothesize the court's verdict (affirmation (1) or negation (0) of the appeal), and then clarify this hypothesis by interpreting significant sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
The Deed of Trust and Mortgage was therefore clearly the principal or the primary security and could not be said ... |
Fatima Bi & Anr Vs. Deputy Custodian General Evacuee Property, New Delhi | J.1. This is an appeal by special leave against the judgment dated 21 November, 1969 of the Delhi High Court dismissing the writ petition of the appellants.2. The appellants made an application under Article 226 of the Constitution in the Delhi High Court. The appellants asked for quashing two orders dated 29 April, 19... | 0[ds]The Custodian General is defined in Section 2 (b) of the Act to mean the Custodian General of Evacuee Property in India appointed by the Central Government under Section 5 of the Act. Section 2 (c) defines Custodian to mean the Custodian for the State and includes any Additional, Deputy or Assistant Custodian of e... | 0 | 1,088 | 290 | ### Instruction:
Speculate on the likely judgment (yes (1) or no (0) to the appeal) and then delve into the case proceeding to elucidate your prediction, focusing on critical sentences.
### Input:
J.1. This is an appeal by special leave against the judgment dated 21 November, 1969 of the Delhi High Court dismissing th... |
Air India Employees Self Contributory Superannuation Pension Scheme Vs. Kuriakose V. Cherian and Ors | the monies deposited in the superannuation and to secure the annuitant annuity amount. Undoubtedly, Rule 89 requires the Trustee to purchase an annuity from the LIC to the exclusion of any one else but this provision must be judged in the context of the fact that the contracts of life insurance which are entered into b... | 0[ds]We need not, however, examine, in the present case, the aforesaid question and the correctness of the view of the High Court on the aspect of maintainability of the writ petition since learned counsel challenging the correctness of the impugned judgment, have adopted a pragmatic and fair approach that this Court h... | 0 | 8,774 | 1,179 | ### Instruction:
Project the court's decision (favor (1) or against (0) the appeal) based on the case proceeding, and subsequently give an in-depth explanation by analyzing relevant sentences from the document.
### Input:
the monies deposited in the superannuation and to secure the annuitant annuity amount. Undoubtedl... |
Amarendu Jyoti & Others Vs. State of Chhatisgarh & Others | relied on the fact that the respondent no. 2 was made to abandon her husbands company because of cruel treatment and compelled to stay at Ambikapur; further, that the respondent no. 2 was subjected to cruelty by telephone calls over which she was threatened and demand of dowry was made. The letters written by responden... | 1[ds]We find from the F.I.R. that all the incidents alleged by the complainant in respect of the alleged cruelty are said to have occurred at Delhi. The cruel and humiliating words spoken to the 2nd respondent/wife by her husband, elderlaw for bringing less dowry are said to have been uttered at Delhi. Allegedly, arbit... | 1 | 1,662 | 381 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
relied on the fact that the respondent no. 2 was made to abandon her husbands company because of cruel trea... |
Janardan Dattuappa Bondre Versus Govind Prasad Shivprasad Choudhary And Others,. (Civil Appeal No. 1936 Of 1978) And Keshavrao Jaiwantrao Bahekar Versus Returning Officer And Others (Civil Appeal No. 2387 Of 1978) Vs. | that they were votes for the appellant. Their validity was never doubted. Plainly what had happened was that by an error 250 ballot papers cast in favour of the appellant had been erroneously placed in the packet of the appellant. It is quite probable that as equal number of ballot papers of the two candidates were exc... | 1[ds]11. We are of opinion that the High Court should not have declined to include in the appellants total votes the 250 votes cast in favour of appellant but included in the packet of Bahekar. If those votes are included in the appellants total, the appellant secures the highest number of votes and is entitled to be d... | 1 | 2,227 | 411 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case to predict the court's ruling (favorably (1) or unfavorably (0)), and then expound on this prediction by highlighting and analyzing key textual elements from the proceeding.
### Input:
that they were votes for the appellant. Their validity was never doubted. Plainly what had happened w... |
Rahul Subodh Windoors Ltd Vs. A.K.Menon | no allotment of shares at all inasmuch as there can be no allotment of shares in blank and in the copies of the share certificate produced before the Special Court no names have been entered. No application had been filed by the second respondent in terms of Section 41(2) of the Companies Act agreeing to become a membe... | 0[ds]In the narration of facts made earlier while referring to the proceedings in the Special Court out of which this appeal arises we have stated the various circumstances taken note of by the Special Court in not accepting that there had been any allotment of shares. A few of these circumstances are firstly, there ca... | 0 | 1,637 | 257 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
no allotment of shares at all inasmuch as there can be no allotment of shares in blank and in the copie... |
Prashanti Medical Services and Research Foundation Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors | by the Committee by notification dated 07.12.2015 but none of them (27) has come forward to question the constitutional validity of Sub-section (7) except the Appellant herein. In other words, out of 28 projects owners whose projects were approved by the Committee by notification dated 07.12.2015, only the Appellant he... | 0[ds]17. Having heard the learned Counsel for the parties and on perusal of the record of the case, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court19. It is not in dispute that 28 projects were approved by the Committee by notification dated 07.12.2015 but none of them (27) has come forward t... | 0 | 3,936 | 920 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
by the Committee by notification dated 07.12.2015 but none of them (27) has come forward to question the cons... |
Wazir Financial Services Pvt. Ltd Vs. Birla Cotsyn (India) Ltd | G.S. Patel, J. 1. Heard Mr. Sawant for the Appellant. 2. The appellant, Wazir Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. (Wazir Financial) was the original Petitioner before the learned Single Judge in Company Petition No. 104 of 2013. It sought the winding up of the Respondent, Birla Cotsyn (India) Ltd. (Birla Cotsyn) on the basis ... | 0[ds]This will make no difference. The question is not of that kind of detail but whether it can fairly be said there is an undisputed (or indisputable) liquidated and ascertained debt due and payable to the petitioning creditor.8. What the learned Single Judge, on a careful consideration of the rival contentions, held... | 0 | 1,049 | 486 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
G.S. Patel, J. 1. Heard Mr. Sawant for the Appellant. 2. The appellant, Wazir Financial Services Pvt. L... |
Sitaram Kashiram Konda Vs. Pigment Cakes & Chemicals Mfg. Co | 1. The plaintiff-appellant filed a suit in the trial Court in the year 1963 alleging certain unjustifiable and illegal actions on the part of his employer, the respondent in this appeal. The reliefs claimed in the suit were the following :"(a) That it may be declared that the defendant has removed the plaintiff from se... | 1[ds]we are of the opinion that it is not quite correct to say that the suit filed by the appellant is not maintainable at all in a civil Court. The correct position of law is that the main reliefs asked for by him which when granted will amount to specific performance of the contract of service and, therefore, they ca... | 1 | 742 | 219 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
1. The plaintiff-appellant filed a suit in the trial Court in the year 1963 alleging certain unjustifiable... |
SANJAY BANSAL Vs. M/S VIPUL LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS VIPUL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPERS LTD.) | certain conditions. The complainant had no intention to use the four flats as a residential / dwelling unit for himself or his family…… 4. The appellant contested the above objections and stated that the flats were not intended for commercial resale but for the members of his family. The appellant has made the followin... | 1[ds]8. We find that the NCDRC has proceeded to decide the objections to the maintainability of the complaint on an ipse dixit. The fact that an individual has booked four flats may not by itself be a circumstance on the basis of which a conclusive presumption can be drawn that he or she is not a consumer in the absenc... | 1 | 1,428 | 323 | ### Instruction:
Hypothesize the court's verdict (affirmation (1) or negation (0) of the appeal), and then clarify this hypothesis by interpreting significant sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
certain conditions. The complainant had no intention to use the four flats as a residential / dwelling unit for h... |
M/s. Padia Timber Company(P) Ltd Vs. The Board of Trustees of Visakhapatnam Port Trust Through its Secretary | seen that even according to the M/s Padia Timber Company Pvt. Ltd., and as per its letter dated 27.11.1990 ex.A.10, the M/s Padia Timber Company Pvt., Ltd., admitted about the receipt of the letter dated 29.10.1990 and the acceptance of tender which is valid for three months. Therefore, having regard to the letter in E... | 1[ds]47. In the judgment and order under appeal, the High Court has not discussed any of the judgments referred to above. The High Court simply recorded the contention of the Appellant that there was no previous approval of the Board of Trustees as contemplated under Section 34(1) of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, an... | 1 | 6,641 | 1,755 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
seen that even according to the M/s Padia Timber Company Pvt. Ltd., and as per its letter dated 27.11.1... |
Major Gopal Singh And Others Vs. Custodian, Evacuee Property, Punjab | The question whether it could be rectified by any of the authorities constituted by the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act or not was not canvassed before us and, therefore, there is no occasion for us to say anything about it.13. Mr. Achhru Ram contended that R. 74 of the Displaced Persons (compen... | 0[ds]8. There is no specific provision in this Act to the effect that after its commen-cement the jurisdiction of the various authorities created by the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950, to deal with the allotment or cancellation of allotment of evacuee property shalldoubt, under S. 10 of the Administration... | 0 | 3,773 | 1,133 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
The question whether it could be rectified by any of the authorities constituted by the Displaced Persons (... |
State Of U.P Vs. M/S Lakshmi Sugar & Oil Mills Ltd | the land in question was never held or occupied by the respondent-Company for cultivation purposes. The exemption claimed by the respondent-company was on that basis declined and the land held to have vested in the Corporation as part of the undertaking. The following passage from the order passed by the Settlement Off... | 1[ds]16. It is evident not only from a plain reading of Section 2(h) (supra) but also the interpretation placed upon the same by this Court that grovelands and lands held for cultivation are excluded from the definition of undertaking. But all other lands and buildings if held or occupied for the purpose of the sugar f... | 1 | 3,743 | 352 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
the land in question was never held or occupied by the respondent-Company for cultivation purposes. The exemption claimed... |
State of Uttar Pradesh, Etc Vs. Synthetics and Chemicals Limited and Others Etc | nor fee but only a levy for the conferment of the exclusive privilege. It is true that the stand taken by the Government in the earlier proceedings was different but that would not make any difference so long as the Government had a right to impose the levy. It has been found that after the addition of S. 24A by Act 30... | 0[ds]In the context it is clear that the decisions proceeded on the basis that the word intoxicating liquor is not confined to potable liquor alone but would include all liquor which contain alcoholWe are unable to accept this contention for in Balsaras case after explicitly approving of the definition of word liquor i... | 0 | 9,801 | 1,925 | ### Instruction:
Speculate on the likely judgment (yes (1) or no (0) to the appeal) and then delve into the case proceeding to elucidate your prediction, focusing on critical sentences.
### Input:
nor fee but only a levy for the conferment of the exclusive privilege. It is true that the stand taken by the Government i... |
Kochukunju Nair Vs. Koshy Alexander | on that point ad different times. In Vasudevan v. Sreemathi Amma, 1966 Kerala Law Times 594 a single judge took the view that the person who has joint ownership of the necessary extent of land is disentitled to the rights of Kudikidappukaran. Buta contrary view was adopted by a Division Bench in Pennamma v. St. Pauls C... | 0[ds]11. To hold that co-owner is not an owner and his possession is not the possession envisaged in Section 2(25) of the Act is in conflict with the correct legal position. If a co-owners wants to erect homestead on the land he is free to do so. When a division of the co-ownership property takes place the co-owner who... | 0 | 1,918 | 578 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
on that point ad different times. In Vasudevan v. Sreemathi Amma, 1966 Kerala Law Times 594 a single judge took the view ... |
Sahu Madho Das And Others Vs. Pandit Mukand Ram And Another(And Connected Appeal) | back on it to the detriment of other persons; all the more so when he himself receives a benefit : see Raja Modhu Sudan Singh v. Rooke ([1897] 24 I.A. 164, 169); Bijoy Gopal v. Krishna ([1906] 34 I.A. 87), and Ramgouda Annagouda v. Bhausaheb ([1927] 54 I.A. 396). Lord Sinha, delivering the judgment of the Privy Council... | 1[ds]Now it is true that the so-called will of 1864 does not make provision for the grandsons, nor does it expressly confer an absolute estate on the legatees, but the witness is illiterate and had to depend on what he was told about the contends and meaning of the document, and what we have to test is the truth of his... | 1 | 8,893 | 947 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
back on it to the detriment of other persons; all the more so when he himself receives a benefit : see ... |
Divisional Controller Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Kalawati Pandurang Fulzele | with item (1) of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 before the Labour Court, Chandrapur against the appellant – MSRTC. In the complaint basically she challenged her termination. It was her case in the complaint that she worked without any break a... | 1[ds]6. It is true that as such all the three courts below (except the Industrial Court) held the termination of the respondent – workman in breach of Sections 25-F and 25-G of the Industrial Disputes Act and, therefore, the Labour Court ordered reinstatement with back wages. However, it is required to be noted that ev... | 1 | 1,326 | 235 | ### Instruction:
Determine the likely decision of the case (acceptance (1) or rejection (0)) and follow up with an explanation highlighting key sentences that support this prediction.
### Input:
with item (1) of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 197... |
Bhopal Sugar Industries Limited Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Others | that an order of assessment cannot be presumed when it has not really been made. It has therefore been argued that as an order of assessment was not made in the present case, it could not be presumed or deemed to have been made simply because a demand was raised for the purpose of affecting the recovery of the cess fro... | 0[ds]There are two provisos to the sub-section, but they are not relevant for the purpose of the controversy before us. It would appear from sub-section that it permits the State Government to impose the cess on the entry of sugarcane into any area that may be specified in its notification, and there is nothing in it t... | 0 | 2,858 | 1,542 | ### Instruction:
Project the court's decision (favor (1) or against (0) the appeal) based on the case proceeding, and subsequently give an in-depth explanation by analyzing relevant sentences from the document.
### Input:
that an order of assessment cannot be presumed when it has not really been made. It has therefore... |
Fida Hussain Vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh | Sarkar, J.1. The appellant who had earlier left India, returned on a passport granted by the Government of Pakistan on May 16, 1953. He had a visa endorsed on his passport by the Indian authorities permitting him to stay in India for three months and this permission was later extended up to November 15, 1953. He did no... | 1[ds]That the appellant was born at Allahabad at a time when it was within his Britannic Majestys Dominion is not in dispute. That being so, we think that it must be held that at the date of his entry into India the appellant was a natural-born British subject and, therefore, not a foreigner. He could not have committe... | 1 | 741 | 288 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
Sarkar, J.1. The appellant who had earlier left India, returned on a passport granted by the Government of P... |
PANKJESHWAR SHARMA AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND OTHERS | appointed by this Court in exercise of its power under Article 142 of the Constitution for doing complete justice, is not reflected from the order of this Court dated 10 th May, 2007. We find substance in what being urged and hold that the order of this Court dated 10th May, 2007 was not under Article 142 of the Consti... | 0[ds]21. Unfortunately, the advertisement to the post of Sub- Inspector which was published by the 2 nd respondent way back on 25th February, 1999 with the condition that one has not crossed the age of 28 years as on 01 st January, 1999, after 21 years down the line, is still has not been finalised and we are pondering... | 0 | 6,102 | 2,474 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
appointed by this Court in exercise of its power under Article 142 of the Constitution for doing comple... |
Rajendra Ramchandra Kavalekar Vs. State of Maharashtra & Another | disclosed commission of a large number of offences. The fact that major part of the offence took place outside the jurisdiction of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Calcutta is not in dispute. But, even if a part of the offence committed by the respondents related to the petitioner Company was committed within the jur... | 0[ds]15) In the instant case, the CBI has initiated the suo-moto investigation against the appellant. In the First Information Report filed before the Special Judge (CBI), Ranchi, it is stated that during the course of investigation of R.C. Case No. 1(A)/2000, which was registered pursuant to the orders of High Court o... | 0 | 3,395 | 579 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
disclosed commission of a large number of offences. The fact that major part of the offence took place outside the jurisd... |
Maturi Pullaiah & Another Vs. Maturi Narasimham & Others | for the proper management of the large family properties and the business and also because a large extent of the properties stood in the name of Narasimha, with the advice of Mr. Chakradhara Rao, a leading lawyer of Eluru, entered into an arrangement with the 1st defendant which was embodied in Ex. B-1, which we have a... | 0[ds]These observations do not appear to contain the full statement of the law on the subject15. Relying upon this judgment it is contended that a competing title is a necessary condition for the validity of a familyarrangement.But it will be noticed that the widows, who had only a womans interest in the property, divi... | 0 | 4,800 | 930 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
for the proper management of the large family properties and the business and also because a large extent of ... |
KAMLESH GUPTA Vs. MANGAT RAI | first defendant in the suit (the first respondent herein), for a sum of Rs. 7 lakhs vide a mortgage deed dated 22.09.2009. The plaintiff later filed C.S. No. 950/2013 for possession of the suit shop by way of redemption on the payment of the aforesaid mortgage amount. The first defendant in the said suit admitted the c... | 0[ds]8. It is evident that the High Court failed to examine the application on merits as far as the question of the impleadment of the aforesaid Pawan Kumar is concerned. In this regard, it is relevant to note that even as per the written statement filed by the second defendant, the said Pawan Kumar is in possession of... | 0 | 1,266 | 621 | ### Instruction:
Speculate on the likely judgment (yes (1) or no (0) to the appeal) and then delve into the case proceeding to elucidate your prediction, focusing on critical sentences.
### Input:
first defendant in the suit (the first respondent herein), for a sum of Rs. 7 lakhs vide a mortgage deed dated 22.09.2009.... |
M/S. Tci Finance Ltd Vs. Calcutta Medical Centre Ltd. | four weeks from the date of order the receiver would not take any further steps in respect of the properties. Stand of the appellant is that pursuant to the said orders symbolic possession was taken by the receiver on 26.3.2003. G.A. No. 3156 of 2003 was filed by respondent No. 1 stating therein that it is a public lim... | 1[ds]8. The Highorder is clearly unsustainable on more grounds than one. Respondent No. 1 claimed its tenancy from Mrs. Prema Gupta. Her application to be impleaded as a party in the present proceedings was rejected. At no point of time she had pressed a claim of being the owner of the property. It is to be noted that ... | 1 | 1,826 | 376 | ### Instruction:
Predict the outcome of the case proceeding (1 for acceptance, 0 for rejection) and subsequently provide an explanation based on significant sentences in the proceeding.
### Input:
four weeks from the date of order the receiver would not take any further steps in respect of the properties. Stand of the... |
Board of Control For Cricket in India Vs. Kochi Cricket Pvt. Ltd. & Others | effect of the proposed Section 87 would be to put all the important amendments made by the Amendment Act on a back-burner, such as the important amendments made to Sections 28 and 34 in particular, which, as has been stated by the Statement of Objects and Reasons, "...have resulted in delay of disposal of arbitration p... | 0[ds]23. All learned counsel have agreed, and this Court has found, on a reading of Section 26, that the provision is indeed in two parts. The first part refers to the Amendment Act not applying to certain proceedings, whereas the second part affirmatively applies the Amendment Act to certain proceedings. The question ... | 0 | 22,588 | 3,261 | ### Instruction:
Hypothesize the court's verdict (affirmation (1) or negation (0) of the appeal), and then clarify this hypothesis by interpreting significant sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
effect of the proposed Section 87 would be to put all the important amendments made by the Amendment Act on a bac... |
Debesh Chandra Das Vs. Union Of India And Ors | the next letter this fact is recognised because on September 7, 1966 he is offered only two alternatives. The alternative of a lower post is advisedly dropped because it discloses too clearly a stigma. If any doubt remained it is cleared by the affidavit which is now filed. Paragraphs 7 and 10 of the affidavit read as ... | 1[ds]10. The position that emerges is that the cadres for the Indian Administrative Services are to be found in the States only. There is no cadre in the Government of India. A few of these persons are, however, intended to serve at the Centre. When they do so they enjoyed better emoluments and status. They rank higher... | 1 | 4,434 | 934 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
the next letter this fact is recognised because on September 7, 1966 he is offered only two alternatives. Th... |
Anthony D'Souza & Others Vs. State of Karnataka | Cr.P.C.(13) The third circumstantial evidence relied upon by the prosecution connecting the accused with the guilt is the various recoveries made at the disclosure of the accused. At the time of interrogation accused nos. 1 to 3 made disclosure statements leading to the discovery of incriminating materials. A-3 gave a ... | 0[ds](7) As already noticed, there is a concurrent finding of facts by both the courts and this Court would be slow to interfere with the concurrent finding of facts unless there is some perversity in the finding. It is also established principle of law that in a case resting on circumstantial evidence, the circumstanc... | 0 | 4,967 | 1,845 | ### Instruction:
Estimate the outcome of the case (positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant) and then give a reasoned explanation by examining important sentences within the case documentation.
### Input:
Cr.P.C.(13) The third circumstantial evidence relied upon by the prosecution connecting the accused with the... |
The Patna Electric Supply Co., Ltd.,Patna Vs. The Patna Electric Supply Workers'Union | this question once again. In dealing with the merits of the problem, it accepted the decision of the appellate tribunal in 1953 Lab AC 677 (supra) and observed that"where the basic wage and dearness allowance are consolidated, house rent at the normal time and the subsequent rise must be presumed to have been taken int... | 1[ds]20. It is thus clear that industrial tribunals have consistently refused to entertain a claim for housing accommodation or for the grant of a special and separate housing allowance against their employers. That is why in making the award under appeal the tribunals below were at pains to emphasise the fact that the... | 1 | 5,050 | 822 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
this question once again. In dealing with the merits of the problem, it accepted the decision of the appell... |
Limbaji Vs. State Of Maharashtra | was bilateral haemothorax with heart injury, liver injury and haemoperitonium. According to him, external injuries 1 and 2 could have been caused if the ear rings were forcibly snatched. External injuries 3 and 4 could have been caused by hard and blunt object like a stone. He clarified that internal injuries could be ... | 1[ds]Whether the presumption could be further stretched to find the appellants guilty of gravest offence of murder is what remains to be considered.It is in this arena, we find divergent views of this Court, as already noticed. In Sanwath Khans case, the three-Judge Bench of this Court did not consider it proper to ext... | 1 | 8,706 | 491 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
was bilateral haemothorax with heart injury, liver injury and haemoperitonium. According to him, external ... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.