target stringlengths 11 70 | prompt stringlengths 200 10k |
|---|---|
20 December 2001 | 51. It appears that on 23 November 2001 the Sunzhenskiy District Prosecutor’s Office refused to open a criminal investigation into the actions of the officials from the Ministry of the Interior, on the ground of absence of corpus delicti. The applicants did not submit a copy of that document, but on |
9 October 1994 | 18. In reply the applicant submitted that, not having received a summons, she did not find out about the court's decision until the police arrived. It was then that she had informed them that she had been unable to attend the appointment and had given them a medical certificate dated |
11 May 2001 | 63. On 29 April 2001 the district prosecutor’s office referred the file in case no. 24031 to the military prosecutor of military unit no. 20102 for further investigation (see paragraph 108 below). The latter sent the case file to the republican prosecutor’s office on |
24 February 1998 | 47. On 26 November 2001 the applicant lodged complaints with the Berdiansk Court, seeking a declaration that the inactivity of the Head of the State Execution Service Department was unlawful in view of his failure to enforce the judgment of |
February 2010 | 15. In October 2009 the applicant lodged a complaint with the Vilnius Regional Administrative Court, claiming that the compensation in securities, established by the national authorities, was unjust, and asking to have the value of the plot of land measuring 0.1286 hectares recalculated. In |
17 October 2000 | 19. On 10 November 2000 the head of the Urus-Martan district department of the interior (the ROVD) provided the investigators with a statement to the effect that Ali Udayev and Ramzan Yusupov had died as a result of the explosion of a projectile of the Shmel type; that on |
15 October 1997 | 24. In a judgment of 4 May 2000 the Supreme Court of Cassation dismissed the applicant’s request to reopen the case. It found that the applicant had been aware of the criminal proceedings against him because he had been present, together with his lawyer, when he had been initially charged on |
from 29 November 1996 up | 12. On 20 July 1998 the trial court gave judgment. It convicted the applicant as charged and sentenced him to 9 years' imprisonment and a fine. The court further ordered that the period spent by him in pre-trial detention |
August/September 2001 | 29. By a decision of 27 May 2008, the prosecutor terminated the criminal investigation against Dr A.D. on the basis that the applicant had failed to lodge a criminal complaint against him within the two‑month time‑limit set by the Criminal Code. A criminal action for unintentional bodily harm could only be started on ... |
11 August 2006 | 13. On 27 November 2006 charges of attempted murder were brought in the Z. County Court against the applicant. At a hearing held on 28 March 2007 a forensic expert gave her evidence. The relevant part of the written record reads:
“The medical documentation ... shows that the defendant V.D. sustained injuries in the fo... |
11 September 1998 | 66. On 8 March 2002 the applicant testified. He stated that on 10 September 1998 he was given oral instructions to go on a mission to Tirana. However, no written order or authorisation was made. He left Bajram Curri at 2 a.m. on |
14 July 1992 | 48. Having examined an application submitted on 9 June 1992 by V.A. Zhigalev, head of Luch Farm, to grant the land to Luch Farm in life-time inheritable possession and not in lease, the Head of the District Administration had adopted Resolution no. 167 of |
an additional three months | 30. On 14 October 2008 the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation upheld the detention order, holding, in so far as relevant, as follows:
“As follows from the materials presented, [the co-defendants and the applicant] are charged with particularly serious criminal offences; a large amount of evidence was collected in... |
the same day | 16. In a decision of 7 June 2006 (опр. от 7 юни 2006 г. по адм. д. № С‑61/2006 г., СГС, ІІІ „д” с‑в.) the Sofia City Court decided to suspend the order’s enforcement. The first applicant was released |
fifteen days | 9. On 24 December 2003 the Edineţ District Court ruled in favour of the applicant and ordered the defendant to pay her 63,885 Moldovan lei (MDL) (the equivalent of 3,901 euros (EUR) at the time). The judgment was not appealed against and after |
the next day | 9. An X-ray showed a displaced slightly-comminuted fracture of the midshaft of the femur. While it was noted that there was no history of metabolic bone disease in the family, it was not noted that the parents were first cousins, an incident relevant to a possible genetic condition. Neither the mother nor grandmother ... |
Between 15 January 1996 and 3 December 1997 | 7. On 27 December 1995 the applicant instituted civil proceedings against ZT in the Celje District Court (Okrožno sodišče v Celju) seeking damages in the amount of 4,400,000 tolars (approximately 18,300 euros) for the injuries sustained.
|
16 December 1996 | 9. At the material time the applicant worked as a journalist for Struma, a local newspaper based in the town of Blagoevgrad, reporting on the work of law‑enforcement agencies and investigating crime‑related news. On |
5 August 2000 | 20. On 16 November 2000 the Central District Hospital provided the prosecutor’s office with an extract from the applicant’s medical file. It stated that on 4 August 2000 the applicant complained of pains in the head and chest and was sent for X-ray screening. On |
12 November 2012 | 76. On 25 December 2012 she complained to the Kharkiv Regional Prosecutor’s Office that she had been shackled to her bed in the maternity hospital at all times, including during the delivery. She also complained that the conditions of detention and nutrition in the SIZO had been inadequate. Lastly, the first applicant... |
9 January 1996 | 24. On 18 December 1996 a doctor at the Istanbul Forensic Medicine Institute drafted the final medical report concerning the first applicant. The doctor concluded that, considering the findings of the medical examination of |
the next 90 days | 11. On 6 June 2005 the President of the Municipality decided to change the relevant DUP further, which decision entered into force on 7 July 2005. Construction in the area was prohibited thereby for |
8 August 2000 | 34. On 27 November 2000 the Urus-Martan prosecutor's office received a letter from a district prosecutor of the Penza Region informing him that on 15 November 2000 Major S. had been questioned about the operation of |
23 October 1999 | 45. It was true that there were some discrepancies between Mr Lalealp's statement to the Diyarbakır branch of the Human Rights Association (“HRA”) and his testimony before the Delegates, notably with regard to the question whether he attended the speech given by the Provincial Governor on |
15 November 1994 | 8. On 3 December 1993 A.N. instituted contentious proceedings against the applicant in the Ljubljana Basic Court, Ljubljana Unit (Temeljno sodišče v Ljubljani, Enota Ljubljana). The applicant did not institute proceedings against A.N. of which she informed the court on |
up to the end of 2003 | 12. On 15 March 2005 the Office carried out a household assessment (Abklärung im Haushalt) at the applicant’s home, during which the applicant stated
(i) that she suffered from constant back pain which often extended down to her left foot; that she had particular difficulty standing in the same place for any length o... |
15 December 2000 | 68. On 5 December 2000 the Deputy Minister of the Interior and the Head of the City Department of the Interior reviewed Mr Makarchykov's complaints and found them unsubstantiated. They further stated that criminal proceedings against Mr Makarchykov on allegations of theft of property from the church had been discontin... |
15 December 2000 | 52. In the course of the proceedings against him, the applicant applied for provisional release on bail on several occasions (3 October 1997, 3 February, 18 June and 27 October 1998, 27 August 1999, 14 and |
three months | 50. According to an expert medical report drawn up by the Braşov Forensic Institute on 9 December 2005, the applicant was suffering from, inter alia, a serious heart condition which required revascularisation surgery that could not be performed in a prison hospital. Consequently, the medical report recommended the sus... |
21 November 2003 | 72. On 17 November 2003 the investigation was resumed upon the order of the deputy to the Chechnya Prosecutor. On 20 November 2003 the investigators examined the Dzhabayevs’ house and collected two bullets and one cartridge. On |
6 December 2000 | 14. The case was remitted to the Supreme Administrative Court, which delivered its decision on 5 November 2004, upholding the decision of the Joint Administrative Chambers of the Supreme Administrative Court. It accordingly annulled the Board’s decision of |
16 July 2007 | 72. On 27 June 2007 the Supreme Court dismissed the fundamental rights complaint. Referring to the findings in its four previous decisions on complaints by the applicant, the Supreme Court found that the Court of Appeal had based its decision on facts which it had argued logically and coherently and from which it coul... |
23 May 2014 | 27. The State Court held that the applicant had not succeeded in calling into question or refuting the open evidence submitted by the National Security Agency. Rather, he had used abstract and general statements in an effort to downplay the importance of the information provided therein. Furthermore, the applicant had... |
the same day | 23. In a decision of 29 August 2005 the Committals Division (chambre du conseil) of the Brussels Court of First Instance committed the applicant and twelve others to stand trial before the Brussels Criminal Court for, in particular, participation in a terrorist group. On |
14 February 2005 | 16. On 8 February 2005 the applicant was requested to appear as a suspect before a prosecutor at the Prosecutor General's Office. The relevant letter was sent to apartment no. 121, where the applicant had not lived since early 2002. On |
27 January 1999 | 8. On 8 January 1999 the District Court prolonged the applicant’s detention until 15 April 1999. It referred to the interests of the pending investigation, such as the need to obtain additional evidence. On |
30 June 1999 | 25. Having received extensive documentary evidence and having held a public hearing, the Constitutional Court established, inter alia, the facts summarised in paragraph 20 above.
The Constitutional Court found that the evidence available indicated that judge D. had made the impugned decree of |
10 February 2001 | 45. According to the Government, on 11 June 2002 the investigation was reopened and transferred to the Moscow City Prosecutor's Office. Some time later, police officer B. was charged with abuse of office under Article 286 of the Criminal Code. The investigation established that on |
28 October 1993 | 24. In its judgment of 19 December 1996, following adversarial proceedings, the Administrative Jurisdiction Division quashed the Regional Court’s judgment of 19 January 1996 and rejected the applicant’s appeal to the Regional Court as ill-founded. Its reasoning included the following:
“The prohibition order issued aga... |
21 February 2006 | 31. The applicant lodged an appeal against the judgment of 19 September 2006, which was dismissed by the Tbilisi Regional Court on 6 March 2007. Referring to paragraphs 39 and 45 of the Court’s judgment in the case of Kjartan Ásmundsson v. Iceland (no. 60669/00, ECHR 2004‑IX), the appellate court stated that Article 1... |
10 February 2000 | 22. The applicant appended to her complaint a sketch map of the district with indications of places where the bodies of her relatives had been discovered and colour photographs of her brother's body taken by Magomed Khashiyev at the time of the discovery of the three bodies on |
6 December 2012 | 30. In reply to the Government’s observations, the applicant responded in relation to his placement in a metal cage during the aforementioned hearing on 30 January 2013. At the same time, with respect to the detention hearing on |
2 June 2002 | 79. Also on 9 July 2004 the investigator of the Main Military Prosecutor's Office withdrew the applicant's victim status in case no. 29/00/0015-03. The order stated that the investigation had established that on |
27 May 2000 | 21. On 28 May 2000 a number of residents of the Staropromyslovskiy District signed a petition addressed to the military commanders of the Staropromyslovskiy District and of Chechnya, with a copy to the Russian President. They complained of a “bullying attitude” on the part of the military stationed in the Staropromysl... |
22 August 2003 | 53. On 6 December 2012 an investigator at Bila Tserkva City Prosecutor’s Office (it is not known when and in what circumstances the investigation had been handed over to that authority) made an entry in the Unified Register of Pre-Trial Investigations regarding an investigation into abuse of office by two unidentified... |
thirty-five days | 39. In a submission of 20 August 2008, the applicant stated that when the Taliban came into power in 1996 and took control of the Hazara area, his father started talking about schools and freedom with others in the Hazara group. The Taliban perceived from this that his father was dissociating himself from his religion... |
the day of the search | 10. In the course of the proceedings, the applicants maintained that the materials found during the search could have been placed there by anyone since anyone could have entered into the building. They pointed out that, on |
the mid-1970s | 19. On 1 February 1993 John Weir was released from prison on licence. In January 1999, he made a statement to a journalist alleging RUC and UDR collusion with loyalist paramilitaries from the Portadown area in |
6 July 1997 | 7. On the same day the mass media reported that an organisation called “The Revolutionary Military Council” («Революционный Военный Совет» – hereafter “the RMC”) had claimed responsibility for the destruction of the monument. In the morning of |
29 April 2000 | 13. While the proceedings were pending before the Supreme Administrative Court, on 24 February 1999 the Prime Minister agreed to appoint the applicant to a similar post in BEDAŞ. Following this decision, on |
18 April 2005 | 48. After a number of stops and starts, the investigation was again resumed on 17 January 2005. Ch.’s whereabouts were established and it was also found that he had changed his name to M. He was subsequently arrested, and on |
17 September 2003 | 14. On 19 August 2004 the District Court extended the applicant’s detention from 19 August to 19 October 2004 and noted as follows:
“On 12 February 2003 [the applicant] was remanded in custody. On 17 March 2003 [his] criminal case was submitted to the court for trial. On |
11 July 2001 | 45. On an unspecified date the acting President of the Rostov Regional Court lodged with the Presidium an application for supervisory review of the judgment of 5 June 2001 and the appeal decision of |
the next week | 7. On 29 October 2004 the police intercepted a conversation between the undercover agent and the first applicant when they met for the drug transaction. The police agent told the applicant that the day before he had been offered a batch of “1,000 pieces” (1,000 de bucăţi) which would be available |
4 June 2001 | 24. On 7 June 2001 the National Movement Simeon II, relying on section 48(5) of the 2001 Election of Members of Parliament Act (see paragraph 41 below), requested the annulment of Mr Dimitrov’s registration. It did so on the basis of a certificate issued by the Dossiers Commission on |
the same day | 17. UNFICYP officer Sergeant Lorraine Stack, who had been helping out another Greek-Cypriot demonstrator a few metres away, went to Officer Flood’s assistance. The two UNFICYP officers then dragged Anastasios Isaak’s body to the area controlled by the Cypriot Government. Greek-Cypriot demonstrators then took the body ... |
8 November 2004 | 131. On 18 August 2004 the Court, in accordance with Rule 40 of the Rules of Court, gave notice of the application and of the complaint about harassment to the Russian Government. In their observations the Government stated that a prosecutor's check had been conducted into these complaints. Within this check the first... |
5 October 1994 | 16. On 29 July 1994 the trial judge completed his report on the Beef Tribunal. On 19 September 1994 he was appointed Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. The trial judge resumed the hearing of the applicants' case on |
14 November 2008 | 35. From 10 to 22 October 2008 and from 6 to 14 November 2008 the applicant was hospitalised in Gliwice Hospital. His medical records prepared for the purposes of discharge from the hospital show that his diabetes was very unstable and that the general indicator of stabilisation of diabetes (HbA1c) was very high (8,3)... |
23 June 2005 | 57. The Prosecutor’s Office and numerous injured parties appealed against this verdict before the Military Panel of the Supreme Court. In its appeal, the prosecution asserted, in particular, that the preparation for the show was based exclusively on the military training documents, which took no account of the specifi... |
31 January 2011 | 25. At the hearing of 5 November 2009 the CoL informed the LAB of the outcome of the constitutional proceedings. However, neither the applicants nor their lawyers were present at that hearing; nor were they present at the subsequent five hearings. On |
between September 1986 and October 1997 | 15. On 3 July 2003 the Administrative Court dismissed the applicant's complaint. It referred to its case-law relating to Section 18 § 4 of the Regional Agricultural Act (Flurverfassungs-Landesgesetz) according to which a change in value of land could only be taken into account until the validation schedule became fina... |
September 1996 | 8. On 27 July 1996 the applicants filed a complaint with the Plovdiv district public prosecutor’s office describing the events of the same day and requesting that Ms N.K. and her companions be prosecuted. In |
20 June 2006 | 8. On 13 April 2006 the Prymorskyy District Court of Odessa (“the Prymorskyy Court”), to which the case was transferred, found the applicant guilty as charged, sentenced him to one year’s imprisonment and exempted him from the sentence as the charges against him became time-barred. On |
2 November 2006 | 33. No medical aid was provided to the applicant in respect of his heart and teeth problems. On 3 June 2006 the applicant asked the SIZO governor to conduct a medical examination as he believed he had contracted hepatitis B because of the failure of the SIZO staff to respect hygiene rules. This request was rejected; s... |
December 2002 | 38. On 3 August 2004 the SRJI requested the inter-district prosecutor’s office to inform them whether there had been any special operations conducted by the Russian federal troops in the village of Samashki in |
three months’ | 36. On 17 November 1998 the Diyarbakır Assize Court concluded that the case should be discontinued in respect of the offence against the applicant, as she had withdrawn her complaint. However, it decided that, although the applicant’s mother had also withdrawn her complaint, H.O. should still be convicted of that offe... |
the same day | 29. According to the statement made by the teacher responsible for S., the couple’s elder daughter, the latter had been visibly stressed and unusually quiet on 31 March 2010. Mr Gutsanov’s sister, who had looked after her niece in her own home |
4 March 1998 | 8. On 4 August 1998 the additional investigative measures were completed and the case was submitted to the City Court for trial. However, on 10 August 1999 the City Court granted a request by the applicant’s counsel to remit, once more, the case for additional investigation. It held that the prosecution authorities ha... |
5 August to 12 September | 167. As the applicants' representatives had indicated that Mr Darbaydze's name did not appear on either of the two “visitors' logs (citizens, lawyers and investigators) for Prison no. 5” covering the periods of |
the following day | 42. On the same date, 2 October 2003, the investigators granted the applicant victim status in the criminal case and questioned her. She stated that at about 3 p.m. on 15 August 2003 Ms R.M. had arrived at her house and told her that their sons, S.-E. Sambiyev and V.M., had been arrested by military servicemen at a ch... |
9 January 1999 | 20. The second applicant learned only four years later, during a criminal investigation, that her medical record contained a form entitled “Request for sterilisation” with her signature dated 9 January 1999. The form lists as the reason for the sterilisation “multiple varicose veins in the pelvis minor” and indicates ... |
3 June 1996 | 32. On 27 May 1996 the Eyüp Magistrate’s Court rejected Cemal Ağdaş’s complaint of 23 May 1996 on the grounds that the administrative and judicial authorities had already initiated an investigation into the matter. On |
the past fifteen years | 20. On 26 October 2003 an article entitled ‘If you can’t escape, enjoy it’, written by the applicant, was published by Vatan. The article read as follows:
“We are going through such times and witnessing such unbelievable events and discussions that no-one can escape their duties. In particular, those who, due to their... |
30 May 1997 | 25. In the meantime, on 31 December 1996, the Warsaw Regional Court had made an application under Article 222 § 4 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to the Supreme Court, asking it to prolong the applicant’s and his co-defendants’ detention on remand until |
28 February 2000 | 41. On 20 June 2001 the Lăpuşna Prosecutor’s Office issued a decision by which it dismissed the applicant’s complaint. It stated inter alia that:
“... According to the medical certificate of 15 January 1998, Corsacov had bruises around his right eye, right ear, and consequences of a barotrauma, head trauma, which coul... |
18 March 2004 | 6. In a letter bearing the Bucharest Post Office’s stamp of 5 November 2004 and received by the Court on 17 November 2004, Ms M. complained, inter alia, of violations of her and her son’s rights under Articles 3 and 8 of the Convention in respect of criminal proceedings which ended by a final judgment of |
15 February 2002 | 6. On 28 January 2002 the applicant brought proceedings against the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, claiming non-pecuniary damages caused by her unlawful prosecution, detention and conviction. On |
27 November 2002 | 37. On 13 January 2003 the applicant lodged an appeal against the decision of 27 November 2002 with the City Court. He complained that the decision of 27 November 2002 had been issued in breach of procedure. In particular, he claimed that he had indeed been taken to the hearing of |
the same day | 18. On 4 May 1990 the Supreme Council adopted a Declaration on the Restoration of the Independence of the Republic of Latvia, which declared Latvia’s incorporation into the USSR unlawful and void and restored legal force to the fundamental provisions of the Latvian Constitution (Satversme) of 1922. However, paragraph ... |
December 1989 | 9. Further, without a formal decision to overturn the decisions issued by the military prosecutor’s office (see paragraph 8 above) and to reopen the applicants’ respective cases, in the main criminal investigation, the prosecutor heard the applicants who reiterated their complaints regarding the offences of illegal de... |
3 March 2011 | 102. On an unspecified date the Supreme Court of the Chechen Republic quashed the decision of 4 February 2011 and remitted the case for fresh examination to the same court. On 25 April 2011 the Groznenskiy District Court granted the applicant’s complaint and found that the decision of |
28 June 1996 | 21. On 3 April 1996 the Wuppertal District Court granted the applicant, at his request, an increased right of access in that he was now entitled to see his daughter every second weekend between Saturday morning and Sunday evening and also for a period of two weeks of summer holidays. The District Court observed that t... |
12 May 2011 | 12. On 5 April 2011 she asked the prosecutor’s office to initiate a criminal investigation against M.M. On 6 May 2011 a prosecutor rejected her request, finding that the medical evidence had confirmed that the injuries caused to the applicants were not considered damaging to their health, meaning that the offence of d... |
20 September 1999 | 49. The Supreme Court found that the investigating bodies and the court that tried the case at first instance had not sought to establish why Mr David Assanidze had waited for so long before implicating the applicant and had not done so at his own trial. Instead, they had merely affirmed: “Relations between Mr David A... |
11 July 2005 | 30. On 16 September 2004 the court dismissed the request, having found no lawful grounds for a reduction in sentence. No appeal was lodged against this decision. As indicated above, the applicant was released on parole on |
16 and 24 June | 12. On 5 July 1993 the accused asked the District Court to reserve the question of law for the Supreme Court as to whether the Attorney General had a discretion to launch criminal proceedings in such a case. The Attorney General objected to that request. This resulted in four days of hearing (10, |
13 August 2001-18 February 2002) | 17. For Lord Mance there were two critical issues: whether the applicant's same-sex relationship was to be regarded as family life for the purpose of Article 8; and whether the child support regime impinged sufficiently on that family life for it to be said to fall within its ambit. Regarding the latter issue, his vie... |
16 and 19 September 2014 | 16. Following the meeting of 14 August 2014, on 9 September 2014 the Bucharest child protection authority asked the Bucharest District Court to order a two-month psychological counselling programme for the children, under the provisions of Article 912 of the Code of Civil Procedure (psychological counselling for child... |
the day before | 50. On 3 March 2009, the Maribor Local Court imposed a fine in the amount of EUR 600 on M.P. for not complying with the contact order. On 4 March 2009 the President of the Maribor Local Court, in the context of the proceedings in respect of the 2006 Act, informed the applicant of the decision taken |
31 May 2011 | 32. In its judgment of 23 October 2014 (Norsk Retstidende (Rt.) 2014 page 976) the Supreme Court first set out the general principles with respect to contact rights, based on the Child Welfare Act, its preparatory works and related Supreme Court case-law, Article 9(3) of the 1989 Convention on the Rights of the Child ... |
13 July 1998 | 21. Subsequently the Styria Regional Governor resumed the proceedings which had been adjourned. In two separate decisions of 10 April 2006 the Styria Regional Governor dismissed the applicant's objection against the Regional Health Insurance Board's decision of |
the period from 18 September 2003 to 24 April 2009 | 20. The Court has not been informed whether and when the amount above was paid to the applicant. Calculations made with a calculator available on the Internet show that the default interest on BGN 3,000 for |
10 December 2008 | 14. After the lodging of the present application before the Court, on 28 October 2008 the applicant sold the flat in question to O. On 26 November 2008 she lodged a request before the Yasamal District Enforcement Department asking that the enforcement proceedings be terminated owing to the resolution of the matter by ... |
28 July 2009 | 15. On 30 July 2009 the Ivanić-Grad Social Welfare Centre (Centar za socijalnu skrb Ivanić-Grad), having interviewed the applicant and the children, submitted its report and recommendations. The report suggested that the children had expressed negative emotions towards their father and fear of corporal punishment by h... |
23 February 2009 | 7. On 17 September 2009 the Administrative Court granted the applicant’s three claims. In particular, it annulled the decision of 23 February 2009, ordered the Service to reinstate her to her previous position and to pay her her average monthly salary starting from |
almost forty years | 14. The applicant claimed that, as confirmed by doctor H., the serious chronic neurological pain from which he was suffering could be considerably alleviated by drug substitution treatment, as had been the case during his previous substitution treatment. Having been addicted to heroin for |
between 14 and 24 December 2004 | 34. On 8 October 2007 the Dymytriv Town Court found the applicant guilty of murder and sentenced him to twelve years’ imprisonment. The court established the applicant’s guilt relying on the self-incriminating statements made by the applicant in the presence of his lawyer |
6 April 2007 | 19. On 26 April 2007 the investigator again refused to institute criminal proceedings, concluding that there had been no crime involved in M.M.’s death. He relied mainly on the statements submitted by the prison guards, who said the fire had broken out at approximately 7 a.m. because of M.M.’s epileptic seizure and th... |
4 February 2009 | 13. At a press conference held on 7 May 2009, the Italian Minister of the Interior stated that the operation to intercept the vessels on the high seas and to push the migrants back to Libya was the consequence of the entry into force on |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.