target stringlengths 11 70 | prompt stringlengths 200 10k |
|---|---|
five years ago | 35. On 9 August 2006 the bailiff requested again information from the Isverna town council in respect of G.I.'s movable and immovable property. On 30 August 2006 the town council informed the bailiff that G.I. had no assets and that he had left the country |
27 April 2001 | 34. On 29 August 2001 the applicant appealed before the Supreme Court of Cassation against the aforementioned decision of the Plovdiv Court of Appeals of 11 May 2000. The basis for the appeal was paragraph 19 of the Amendments to the CCP promulgated on |
2 June 2001 | 15. On 17 July 2001 the Moscow City Court dismissed an appeal against the above decision for the following reasons:
“...In examining the question of the lawfulness and reasonableness of the placement in custody and extension of the detention of [the first applicant], the [District] court verified whether the prosecuto... |
11 February 2003 | 67. Referring to the information provided by the Prosecutor General’s office, the Government submitted that the applicant’s first complaint that his son had been abducted had been received by the district prosecutor’s office on |
8 September 2005 | 21. On 26 August 2005 the Zhytomyr Regional Court of Appeal upheld the resolution of 8 August 2005. On the same date, the applicant had a second heart attack and was transferred to the Central City Hospital of Zhytomyr, where he stayed, under police supervision, until |
26 October 2005 | 55. On 26 December 2007 the Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office (Opštinsko javno tužilaštvo) in Pirot requested the institution of a preliminary judicial investigation (preduzimanje pojedinih istražnih radnji) into the respondent’s non-compliance with the final custody judgment of |
30 May 2001 | 37. On 7 March 2001 the court ordered an inquiry as to whether the applicant had undergone the examination scheduled for December 2000 and when the psychiatric opinion would be submitted. The court’s registry established that the examination was arranged for |
15 March 2005 | 15. Moreover, the applicant claimed that, as there were no rules on how national law was to be applied when the main hearing lasted for several days, a Convention-friendly approach should have been adopted. The Appeal Court had set up a procedural plan according to which the applicant was to be heard in person only on... |
the following days | 47. In a written statement to the Administrative Court by the head of the public relations department of the Public Prosecutor’s Office it was noted that the press release of 9 April 2006 had been prompted by a telephone call from a journalist who had heard about the arrest of a judge and had sought confirmation of th... |
19 September 2006 | 11. The applicant lodged another complaint with the Edineț prosecutor’s office on 31 August 2006, stating that he had been again attacked by his children and ex-wife; during that attack they had also threatened to kill him and destroy or throw away his property if he did not leave the house. He lodged a further compla... |
13 November 1998 | 10. On 3 December 1998, pursuant to a decision by the head of the town administration, the Committee for the Administration of Property of the Town of Samara (“the Committee”) ordered the liquidation of the company. The decision of the head of the town administration was dated |
15 August 2002 | 6. The applicant, a practising defence lawyer, represented ‒ initially before the Ljubljana District Court and subsequently before the appellate courts ‒ a defendant, I.P., who had been charged with three murders committed on |
2 December 2006 | 39. On 31 January 2007 the investigators interviewed L.Ts. as a witness. She submitted that she held the post of the senior inspector with the information department of the Ministry of the Interior of the Chechen Republic and that on an unspecified date in April 2006 she had gone, together with members of a film crew,... |
several weeks | 32. In fact, the old ferry boat İmralı 9 was still in service but could only sail when there was little wind. The larger ferry boat, Tuzla, which the Government had promised when the previous Öcalan case was pending before the Grand Chamber of the Court, began operating in 2006. The Tuzla, being better suited than the... |
24 July 1996 | 20. On 12 April 1996 the District Court appointed a third expert to determine the manner in which the property should be divided. A hearing held on 23 June 1996 was adjourned because the expert report had not yet been submitted. This report was submitted on |
23 March 2009 | 27. On 9 April 2009 the next level of prosecutor from the Hâncești Prosecutor’s Office dismissed the applicant’s appeal and upheld the decision of the Hâncești Prosecutor’s Office of 23 March 2009. He argued that no independent expert opinion or supplementary confrontations had been necessary because the facts of the ... |
from December 2007 to January 2010 | 8. On 2 November 2010 the General Prosecutor’s Office (“the GPO”) instituted criminal proceedings against the applicant and another individual, Mr P., under Article 191 § 3 of the Criminal Code. The GPO asserted that while he was Minister of the Interior |
25 October 2007 (to 31 January 2008 | 12. During the court proceedings, Gdańsk Regional Court further extended the applicant's pre-trial detention on several occasions, namely, on 12 December 2006 (to 31 May 2007), an unspecified subsequent date, |
23 August 2007 | 31. On 24 October 2007 a senior prosecutor of the same office rejected the applicant's representative's appeal against the decision of 26 September 2007. In addition to upholding the conclusions of the decision of |
election day | 7. After election day, the applicants lodged complaints with the Central Electoral Commission (“the CEC”) concerning a number of irregularities in their respective constituencies that had allegedly taken place during and/or before |
5 March 1999 | 15. On 14 December 1995 the General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina (“the Dayton Peace Agreement”) entered into force. It confirmed the continuation of the legal existence of Bosnia and Herzegovina as a State, while modifying its internal structure (Article 1 § 1 of Annex 4 to the Dayton Peace ... |
17 May 2007 | 18. The applicant then sought to renew his application for permission to apply for judicial review, submitting detailed amended grounds for his application on 21 February 2007. The oral hearing of the renewed application was listed for |
12 February 2004 | 9. On 10 March 2004 the Leninskiy District Court of Rostov-on-Don remanded the applicant in custody. The decision read as follows:
“... From the material submitted by the prosecution, it follows that [the applicant] was charged with several particularly serious offences, and there are grounds to suspect him of having ... |
26 February 2002 | 37. On 26 March 2002 the case was submitted to the court for trial. On the same date the Moskovskiy District Court of Tver, acting pursuant to Articles 220-1 and 220-2 of the RSFSR Code of Criminal Procedure, dismissed the applicant’s complaint concerning the unlawfulness of his detention and application for release p... |
January 1998 | 26. A doctor serving as a public-health inspector for the health and social services department for the département of Rhône sent two letters to the prefect of the Rhône-Alpes region on 13 and 18 August 1999. In the first of those letters the doctor stated, inter alia:
“I observe that Mr Aoulmi has not produced any me... |
11 August 2004 | 27. The applicants appealed against SIAC’s ruling that evidence which might have been obtained by torture was admissible. For the purposes of the appeal, the parties agreed that the proceedings before SIAC to challenge certification fell within Article 5 § 4 of the Convention and as such had to satisfy the basic requi... |
26 March 1991 | 8. On 29 January 1991, S. was admitted to the A. hospital for examinations. In February 1991 the parents and the social welfare authorities were informed of the hospital’s conclusion that S. had been subjected to incest by T. It was suspected that T. had also sexually abused J. T., A. and J. denied the accusations. On... |
28 March 2000 | 27. In a judgment delivered on 13 March 2000 the Košice II District Court allowed the applicant and his former wife to pay the outstanding maintenance in respect of their children by monthly instalments. The judgment was served on |
the last six months | 23. Report of 13 April 2000:
“It appears from reports of the course of [the applicant’s] detention that prior to his placement in the EBI he was seen as a dominant man familiar with the daily routine in detention. There were regular signs that he exerted much (negative) influence, involving, inter alia, threats. These... |
22 August 2007 | 9. On 21 August 2007 the president of the bench examining the applicant’s case requested that he should be allowed to recuse himself from the proceedings. By a decision of the Poznan Regional Military Court dated |
4 March 2000 | 84. The detention centre in Chernokozovo, where the first applicant was detained, received extensive attention from various human-rights institutions, including the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT), following allegations of severe ill-treatment of detainees. On |
1 December 2000 | 33. On 10 July 2002 the Supreme Court of the Republic of Dagestan allowed the applicant’s appeal. It quashed the Town Court’s judgment on the basis of the same shortcomings as those previously indicated by it. Noting that the proceedings had been pending since 1993, the Supreme Court decided, with the agreement of bo... |
November 2001 | 48. Kh.S., interviewed as a witness on 7 November 2001, stated that on the evening of 6 November 2001 Aset Yakhyayeva and Milana Betilgiriyeva had stayed at his house with his daughters. At about 6.30 a.m. on 7 |
7 February 2005 | 13. The applicant applied again for a survivor's pension on 29 July 2004. The request was dismissed on 6 December 2004 by the Committee of the Welfare Institutions as the case was still pending before the Administrative Court. An appeal was rejected by the Board of Directors on |
8 January 2001 | 7. In the resumed proceedings, on 4 March 1999 the plaintiffs changed their action and claimed ownership. Subsequently, the proceedings were suspended pending the outcome of an underlying land register procedure. The latter ended on |
29 April 2011 | 26. The applicant appealed against some of those decisions. In particular, he appealed against the decision of 2 April 2009, but this was dismissed by the Lublin Regional Court on 8 June 2009. The applicant also appealed against the commission’s decision of |
2 August 2004 | 36. On 27 September 2004 the second applicant’s mother lodged a criminal complaint with the CPPO, alleging that the member of parliament had visited the first applicant in prison in July 2004 and had offered him 30,000 Georgian lari (GEL) (approximately 13,000 euros (EUR)) to stand by his confession. The investigator ... |
28 January 2005 | 28. At a hearing on 14 January 2005 before the Court of Appeal the parties made submissions on the prosecutor’s reasons for appeal, namely the request for a reclassification of the crimes committed by the applicants. The applicants’ lawyers requested the court reject the request as it was not supported by evidence and... |
27 September and 12 October 2010 | 33. On 30 July 2010 the applicant challenged the lawfulness of his arrest of 23 June 2010 before the Kyiv Shevchenkivskyy District Court (“the Shevchenkivskyy Court”). He alleged, firstly, that his arrest had not fallen within the ambit of Article 106 § 2 of the CCP and so had been arbitrary and unforeseeable. Further... |
February 1999 | 45. According to the second applicant, from the date of his arrest and until 8 February 1999 he had no access to legal assistance and was not allowed to send any correspondence. He was therefore prevented from lodging a complaint about ill-treatment. From |
23 February 2000 | 109. On 19 January 2001 the military prosecutor’s office of the Volgograd Garrison informed the investigator that, according to the information provided by the acting head of military unit no. 12209, no servicemen of that unit had been stationed on |
from December 2004 to January 2006 | 14. On 13 October 2006 the same prosecutor examined a further complaint from the applicant concerning the lawfulness of the recordings. She stated that the interception had been carried out by the Constitutional Protection Bureau |
16 September 2008 | 27. As to the number of Moldovans holding a second nationality other than Romanian, this figure is also unknown. However, it appears to be considerable and it seems that Russian nationality is the second most popular, after Romanian. On |
four years and six months’ | 14. In a judgment of 9 May 2005, the Milan Assize Court altered the legal classification of the first offence charged. It took the view that the acts of which he stood accused did not constitute international terrorism but criminal conspiracy. It sentenced the applicant to |
10 and 11 January 2006 | 8. On 7 March 2005 the indictment against the applicant was lodged with the Poznań Regional Military Court. Hearings in the case were subsequently held on 27 April, on 23 and 24 August, on 6 and 7 December 2005 and on |
23 February 2000 | 10. On 17 February 2000 two authorities - the Lithuanian State Security Department and the Centre for Research into the Genocide and Resistance of the Lithuanian People - jointly concluded that the applicant was subject to the restrictions imposed under Article 2 of the Law on the Evaluation of the USSR State Security... |
5 September 1999 | 12. On 3 June 1999 the applicant was drafted into the army. He was assigned to military unit no. 22336 in Volgograd. The applicant alleged that in the unit he had on many occasions been beaten up and harassed by senior conscripts. They had allegedly forced him and other younger conscripts to sleep outdoors at night an... |
three months | 32. On 30 November 1998 the Main Customs Office set aside the 1994 licence to run the warehouse, having found that after 20 August 1997 the applicant company had ceased its business activities. Under the provisions of the Customs Code, the customs authorities were obliged to withdraw the licence to run the bonded ware... |
23 September 2007 | 48. The applicants furnished the following documents in support of their submissions: the first applicant’s account dated 3 August 2007; a witness testimony by R.A. dated 8 September 2007; an account by witness A.M. given on |
28 July 2004 | 13. On 28 July 2004 the applicant was examined by a forensic doctor. She told the doctor that she had been beaten by three unknown men. On 2 August 2004 she was examined by a neurologist. The final medical report of |
27 February 2001 | 44. The plenary assembly opined, inter alia, that the physical findings noted in the medical reports, dated 22 February 2001 at 8.15 p.m. and 23 February 2001 at 2.45 p.m., had originated on 22 February 2001 between 10.15 a.m. and 8.15 p.m. and that the wound on the forehead could have been the result of a blow with a... |
31 May 1997 | 70. This report was prepared by a gendarme captain from the District Gendarmerie Command in Kocaköy. It contained the findings of the captain after his investigation into the applicant’s allegations of |
23 November 2004 | 23. On 27 August 2004 the Prosecutor's Office concluded that Mr Fedin's death had been the result of a tragic accident and decided not to institute any criminal proceedings. The applicant again filed a complaint against that decision. On |
10 July 2001 | 11. On 19 February 2002 the Kharkiv Regional Court of Appeal (Апеляційний суд Харківської області, the former Kharkiv Regional Court as renamed on 29 June 2001) quashed the decision of 3 December 2001 and remitted the question of the admissibility of the appeal against the decision of |
three months | 23. Following a request dated 4 March 2014 from the Prosecutor General’s Office for an extension of the period of the applicant’s pre-trial detention, on 6 March 2014 the Nasimi District Court extended the applicant’s detention pending trial by |
26 July 1993 | 21. On 24 July 1993, the gendarmes drew up an incident report and a location sketch map. The statements of the villagers were taken by the gendarmerie. Zeki Matyar, father of the murdered child, stated that he had been hit on the head by Bişar Nibak, the husband of the murdered woman and that he blamed the PKK for the... |
from 15 February to 16 August 2003 | 23. The applicant produced written statements by Mr M., who had been detained in cell no. 501 in detention facility IZ-77/2 in 2000-2002, and Mr V. who had been detained together with the applicant from 17 November 2002 to 15 February 2003 in cell no. 140 and |
7 August 2007 | 83. In their reply of 19 September 2001 to the third and fourth applicants’ complaint, the Vladivostok Administration stated that according to the information at their disposal, the human factor had played a role in the flood of |
25 February 2002 | 18. In the re-examination proceedings, the applicant replied to two sets of submissions by SZ.
Hearings were held on 20 June, 10 October and 5 December 2001 and 31 January 2002.
On 31 January 2002 the Ljubljana Labour and Social Court delivered an interim judgment in which it found SZ liable for 70% of the damage suff... |
15 November 2001 | 21. On 14 June 2001, further to the divorce petition filed by M.E., the Celje District Court issued an interim decision granting M.E. provisional custody (varstvo in vzgoja) of the second applicant pending the outcome of the proceedings. This decision was upheld by the Celje Higher Court on |
19 March 2008 | 97. As of that date and until 31 August 2007 the applicant was detained in cell no. 55 measuring 46.68 square metres and equipped with 16 sleeping places. The Government submitted a certificate dated |
November 1999 | 6. The first applicant was born in 1947 and lives in Dolyna, a city in the Ivano-Frankivsk Region.
In December 1996 her mother obtained a share of land in the village of Kopytkove in the Zdolbunivsky district of the Rivne region (see paragraphs 11 to 14 below concerning the nature of shares of land and their subsequen... |
28 October 2005 | 145. Further to the withdrawal of their asylum requests, on 19 October 2005 the Ministry terminated the proceedings. The Ministry also ordered that the applicant and his family should return to Germany. On |
the same day | 49. On 8 April 2009 the Supreme Court dismissed the applicant’s appeal as ill-founded. As regards his complaints concerning his statement given to the police, that court noted:
“... The lawfulness of [the statement given to the police] was not put into doubt by the appellant’s complaints that lawyer M.R. had not been ... |
between October 1999 and February 2000 inclusive | 51. On 15 May 2004 the investigators requested that the Central Archives of the Russian Ministry of the Interior (the MVD) provide them with the following information:
“....the investigation established the involvement in the crime [the murder of the applicant’s sisters] of military servicemen from military brigade no... |
6 March 1998 | 17. On 21 November 1997 the applicant company applied to a bench of the Ukrainian Supreme Arbitration Tribunal seeking revision under the “supervisory review” procedure of the two judgments mentioned above. In a judgment of |
24 March 2005 | 14. According to witness statements of 25 March 2005 made by Kh. and Bi. (it is unclear whether they were the applicant’s acquaintances or relatives), when they had arrived at the applicant’s house at an unspecified time on |
15 February 2001 | 9. On 11 October 2000 the applicant lodged an interim application asking for visiting rights as regards the two children before the Family Court of First Instance of Athens. His request was accepted on |
between 20 August and 10 September 2009 | 30. On 14 September 2009 the prosecuting officer and eight other police officers gave evidence, and documents were produced. On 22 September 2009 further documents were produced, and a pharmacist, another police officer and a third person gave evidence. An expert in communications technology and a translator were appo... |
24 March 1998 | 23. On 20 July 1998 the District Court requested the first applicant to specify the reasons for his appeal. The first applicant replied on 22 July 1998. On 2 September 1998 the case file was submitted to the Regional Court. On 30 September 1998 the Regional Court quashed the relevant part of the District Court's judgm... |
13 April 2006 | 44. On 1 March 2006 the applicant resubmitted his supplementary pleadings of 17 February 2006 to the Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court (“the Regional Court”) and complained about Judge B.’s refusal to accept them. In a letter of |
8 November 2008 | 35. As regards the applicant’s right to stays outside during her detention in Braunschweig, the Regional Court, endorsing the findings of the District Court in this respect, found that the right provided by no. 10 of the Police Custody Regulations (see paragraph 46 below) to be allowed to stay outside for 45 minutes p... |
27 April 2002 | 17. On 12 May 2004 the District Court found the applicant guilty of drug trafficking and sentenced him to six years’ imprisonment, having included in the sentence the period of the applicant’s detention from |
5 January 2000 | 13. On 12 September 2001 the President of the Tula Regional Court sent a letter to the Aleksin Town Court. The letter read as follows:
“I am sending you the complaint of Mr Gorbachev which was received from the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. [He complains] about your court's lengthy failure to examine his ac... |
7 June 2008 | 24. On 6 May 2008 the Regional Court examined the applicant’s appeal against the detention order of 4 February 2008. It upheld the findings of the lower court as regards the lawfulness and reasons underlying his detention. At the same time the Regional Court, regard being had to the fact that the defendants had been d... |
24 November 2005 | 10. After meeting T. and beginning a relationship with him at the beginning of 2004, she moved into his flat at the end of that year, although she was still married to another man, R.L., whom she divorced on |
between 1 and 31 January 2000 | 69. In 2003 the temporary isolation facility of the Naurskiy District Department of the Interior (ROVD) informed the investigator from the District Prosecutor's Office that the first applicant had not been detained there |
9 December 2004 | 19. On 13 December 2005 the Oktyabriskiy District Court examined the prosecutor's revision request. Considering that the invalidation of the occupancy voucher was a fact “essential for the dispute”, the District Court decided to re-open the proceedings (Article 392 of the Code of Civil Procedure) and quashed the judgm... |
23 May 2007 | 18. In its decision, the court referred to the applicant’s attempt to seek an out-of-court settlement with the Ministry of Justice. It also addressed an expert report, which confirmed that the applicant had sustained non-pecuniary damage (mental pain and anxiety) as a result of his detention. Relying on section 141 of... |
26 March 2010 | 11. Between 26 February 2007 and 30 October 2009 the applicant served the sentence in IK-9, a correctional institution in Omsk. The dormitory was crammed and in a poor state of repair. On the latter date the applicant was transferred to IK-3 where he stayed until |
7 August 2009 | 20. Officers S., Y. and F. submitted written reports in the following terms. On 6 August 2009, noting the blocking of the entrance to the office building, they had ordered the people present to disperse. The same thing had happened on |
16 February 2002 | 53. On 27 January 2004 the first applicant was granted victim status in case no. 59054 and questioned. He stated that on 14 February 2002 the armed clash between the federal troops and insurgents had commenced in his village. The servicemen had taken away his sons and their cousin, Ruslan Nasukhayev for an identity ch... |
7 August 2003 | 18. On 6 April 2005 the Split Municipal Court dismissed the civil action on the grounds that after the applicant and his wife had declined to assume responsibility for the body, the hospital had, in accordance with the law, disposed of the child’s body together with other clinical waste. The relevant part of the judgm... |
15 October 2008 | 89. The Constitutional Court noted that the Court of Appeal had not questioned the very extension of the limitation period or the possibility of applying extended limitation periods to offences committed before the entry into force of the amending legislation which had not become time-barred under the rules formerly a... |
21 March 1986 | 10. In proceedings no. 56/94 the applicant claimed the amount of CYP 36,280 as compensation for the compulsory acquisition of plot no. 148 plus CYP 1,000 for the valuer's fees, interest at a rate of 9% from |
12 February 2008 | 21. The applicant informed the Department for the Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights about the developments described above, and alleged that his being dismissed once again and the outcome of the new reinstatement proceedings amounted to a failure by the State to comply with the Court’s judgm... |
24 July 2003 | 13. The District Court also examined the transcripts of audio- and video-recordings and noted as follows:
“The report on examination of the Sony Protocol No. 5-60 videocassette, dated 2 September 2003, and the transcript of the conversation confirm the textual identity of the conversation which K. and A. had in the ho... |
7 to 9 January 2004 | 23. The trial continued between 7 and 30 January 2004, 36 witnesses being summoned and an additional expert report in psychiatry being ordered. According to the Government, the main hearing was actually held from |
11 November 2008 | 24. On 3 and 6 April 2009 the applicant association inspected the register of churches, religious groups and communities (“the court register”) of the Skopje Court of First Instance, which became, by virtue of the 2007 Act, the registration court. From |
25 August 2010 | 18. The applicant subsequently claimed that there were impediments to his deportation and requested that his application for a residence permit be examined anew. His request was refused by the Migration Board on |
16 August 2007 | 32. On 3 August 2007 the applicant applied to the custodial court with a view to making an application to a court to have him declared legally capable. He explained that in April 2000 he had been ill and had not been feeling well, which had been the reason for his inability to provide arguments against his wife’s appl... |
22 July 2005 | 20. On 20 June 2005 the Warsaw Regional Court again extended the applicant's detention. On 5 July 2005 the applicant's lawyer appealed, maintaining that there was no need to continue the applicant's detention. However, on |
24 November 2008 | 28. The Supreme Court noted that the first applicant had been charged on 14 December 2007 and that the warning about the amendment of his tax assessment had been sent on 26 August 2008. Thereafter the case concerning the tax penalties and the criminal case had been conducted in parallel until they had been decided res... |
3 June 2010 | 58. On 4 May 2011 his application was rejected by the Moscow Department of the FMS. The FMS noted, in particular, that after his entry to Russia on 30 May 2010, the applicant, a national of Uzbekistan, had been arrested by the police on |
29 March 2005 | 8. On 28 May 2004 the Minister for Immigration and Integration (Minister voor Vreemdelingenzaken en Integratie, at that time the successor to the Deputy Minister of Justice) withdrew the applicant’s residence permit (but not those of his wife and children) as Article 1F of the 1951 UN Convention relating to the Status... |
more than two years’ | 15. On 15 November 2006 the Tverskoy District Court ordered a further extension of the applicant’s detention until 11 January 2007. At the hearing the applicant asked to be released on bail or under the personal guarantee of a member of the Russian Parliament. However, the court did not examine the possibility of a mo... |
30 November 9 December 2005 | 38. The parties agree that the applicant was held in the detention ward on the following dates:
Start date
End date
3 May
7 September 2005
19 September
14 October 2005
19 October
28 October 2005
|
12 and 16 August 1999 | 7. In the meantime, on 27 July 1999 the national authorities instituted criminal proceedings (case no. 990666) against unspecified persons in relation to numerous unlawful imports of cars from abroad. On |
20 May 2005 | 10. On 12 May 2005 the Pruszków District Prosecutor (Prokurator Rejonowy) lodged a bill of indictment with the Warsaw District Court. The applicant was charged with fraud, committed in an organised criminal group. There were 16 defendants in the case, all charged with numerous counts of fraud committed in an organised... |
22 December 2005 | 15. On 5 December 2005 the Vilnius Regional Court extended the detention by another three months, upholding the argument that the applicant had been charged with very serious and systematically committed crimes. By that time, most of the suspects and witnesses had already been questioned in court, but since it was not... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.