id stringlengths 16 16 | task_family stringclasses 20
values | task_type stringclasses 20
values | domain stringclasses 14
values | difficulty stringclasses 5
values | difficulty_label stringclasses 5
values | language stringclasses 1
value | instruction stringlengths 54 90 | context stringlengths 0 82 | response stringlengths 1 330 | analysis_plan stringclasses 10
values | verification stringclasses 10
values | verification_type stringclasses 7
values | prompt_review stringclasses 2
values | prompt_alignment stringclasses 3
values | constraint_check stringclasses 3
values | consistency_check stringclasses 2
values | math_check stringclasses 3
values | logic_check stringclasses 3
values | counterexample_check stringclasses 2
values | data_analysis_check stringclasses 3
values | code_check stringclasses 3
values | evidence_check stringclasses 3
values | source_check stringclasses 3
values | hallucination_control stringclasses 10
values | error_detection stringclasses 10
values | error_repair stringclasses 10
values | answerability stringclasses 2
values | confidence float32 0.85 1 | uncertainty float32 0 0.15 | reasoning_depth int16 1 4 | minimal_sufficient_reasoning bool 1
class | unnecessary_reasoning bool 1
class | stop_condition stringclasses 10
values | surface_variation int32 0 16 | numeric_variation int32 0 96 | structure_variation int32 0 30 | ood_style int32 0 12 | quality_score float32 0.9 0.9 | synthetic bool 1
class | license stringclasses 1
value | generator_version stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
mtd-000000006900 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6900. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 15 | 13 | 18 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006901 | evidence_check | evidence_check_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6901. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 16 | 14 | 19 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006902 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6902. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 0 | 15 | 20 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006903 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6903. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 1 | 16 | 21 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006904 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6904. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 2 | 17 | 22 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006905 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6905. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 3 | 18 | 23 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006906 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6906. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 4 | 19 | 24 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006907 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6907. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 5 | 20 | 25 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006908 | constraint_reasoning | constraint_reasoning_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6908. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 6 | 21 | 26 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006909 | evidence_check | evidence_check_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6909. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 7 | 22 | 27 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006910 | planning | planning_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6910. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 8 | 23 | 28 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006911 | evidence_check | evidence_check_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6911. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 9 | 24 | 29 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006912 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6912. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 10 | 25 | 30 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006913 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6913. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 11 | 26 | 0 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006914 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6914. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 12 | 27 | 1 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006915 | math | arithmetic | mathematics | medium | medium | en | Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 2627986 ÷ 379 | 2627986 | Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result. | Exact arithmetic verification. | exact | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied operands. | Check arithmetic operation. | Recompute if mismatch detected. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop after exact verification. | 13 | 28 | 2 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006916 | logic | deductive_reasoning | logic | medium | medium | en | Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements. | If x > 40, then x is positive.
x = 40.
y = 16. | Conclusion: x is positive.
Result: Yes. | Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion. | Logical consistency check. | symbolic | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Reason only from supplied premises. | Check whether conclusion is entailed. | Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 2 | true | false | Stop once entailment is established. | 14 | 29 | 3 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000006917 | research | research_methodology | climate science | medium | medium | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about climate science. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 15 | 30 | 4 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000006918 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6918. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 16 | 31 | 5 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006919 | constraint_reasoning | constraint_reasoning_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6919. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 0 | 32 | 6 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006920 | ambiguity | ambiguity_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6920. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 1 | 33 | 7 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006921 | constraint_reasoning | constraint_reasoning_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6921. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 2 | 34 | 8 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006922 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6922. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 3 | 35 | 9 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006923 | reasoning | comparison | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values. | A = 63, B = 86 | B is greater than A by 23. | Compare values and compute difference. | Check comparison and difference. | exact | passed | passed | Use only supplied values. | Check comparison direction. | Recompute difference. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after comparison verification. | 4 | 36 | 10 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000006924 | logic | deductive_reasoning | logic | medium | medium | en | Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements. | If x > 69, then x is positive.
x = 69.
y = 58. | Conclusion: x is positive.
Result: Yes. | Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion. | Logical consistency check. | symbolic | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Reason only from supplied premises. | Check whether conclusion is entailed. | Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 2 | true | false | Stop once entailment is established. | 5 | 37 | 11 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000006925 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6925. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 6 | 38 | 12 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006926 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6926. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 7 | 39 | 13 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006927 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6927. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 8 | 40 | 14 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006928 | research | research_methodology | climate science | medium | medium | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about climate science. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 9 | 41 | 15 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000006929 | instruction_following | format_constraint | general | medium | medium | en | Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number. | 4818 | 9636 | Identify transformation and output constraint. | Check transformation and requested format. | constraint | passed | passed | passed | No unsupported content. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop when requested format is satisfied. | 10 | 42 | 16 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000000006930 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6930. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 11 | 43 | 17 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006931 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6931. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 12 | 44 | 18 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006932 | data_analysis | descriptive_statistics | statistics | medium | medium | en | Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset. | Dataset: 77, 93, 74, 20, 42 | Mean = 61.2000 | Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify. | Recompute sum and count. | exact | passed | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied dataset. | Check arithmetic and denominator. | Recompute statistic. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after numerical verification. | 13 | 45 | 19 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000006933 | constraint_reasoning | constraint_reasoning_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6933. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 14 | 46 | 20 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006934 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6934. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 15 | 47 | 21 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006935 | fact_check | claim_verification | general_knowledge | medium | medium | en | Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence. | The Earth has one natural satellite. | Assessment: Correct.
A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source. | Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence. | External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims. | evidence | required | required | Never fabricate a citation. | Identify unsupported factual certainty. | Qualify or verify the claim. | answerable | 0.85 | 0.15 | 3 | true | false | Stop after evidence requirement is identified. | 16 | 48 | 22 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000006936 | math | arithmetic | mathematics | medium | medium | en | Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 442541 + 22106 | 464647 | Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result. | Exact arithmetic verification. | exact | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied operands. | Check arithmetic operation. | Recompute if mismatch detected. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop after exact verification. | 0 | 49 | 23 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006937 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6937. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 1 | 50 | 24 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006938 | fact_check | claim_verification | general_knowledge | medium | medium | en | Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence. | The Earth has one natural satellite. | Assessment: Correct.
A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source. | Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence. | External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims. | evidence | required | required | Never fabricate a citation. | Identify unsupported factual certainty. | Qualify or verify the claim. | answerable | 0.85 | 0.15 | 3 | true | false | Stop after evidence requirement is identified. | 2 | 51 | 25 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000006939 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6939. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 3 | 52 | 26 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006940 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6940. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 4 | 53 | 27 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006941 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6941. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 5 | 54 | 28 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006942 | logic | deductive_reasoning | logic | hard | hard | en | Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements. | If x > 89, then x is positive.
x = 89.
y = 64. | Conclusion: x is positive.
Result: Yes. | Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion. | Logical consistency check. | symbolic | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Reason only from supplied premises. | Check whether conclusion is entailed. | Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 2 | true | false | Stop once entailment is established. | 6 | 55 | 29 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000006943 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6943. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 7 | 56 | 30 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006944 | logic | deductive_reasoning | logic | hard | hard | en | Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements. | If x > 55, then x is positive.
x = 55.
y = 48. | Conclusion: x is positive.
Result: Yes. | Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion. | Logical consistency check. | symbolic | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Reason only from supplied premises. | Check whether conclusion is entailed. | Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 2 | true | false | Stop once entailment is established. | 8 | 57 | 0 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000006945 | reasoning | comparison | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values. | A = 10, B = 38 | B is greater than A by 28. | Compare values and compute difference. | Check comparison and difference. | exact | passed | passed | Use only supplied values. | Check comparison direction. | Recompute difference. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after comparison verification. | 9 | 58 | 1 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000006946 | code | function_generation | programming | hard | hard | en | Write Python code that returns the square of an integer. | Input example: n = 6518 | def square(n):
return n * n | Identify required input/output and implement minimal function. | Static code contract check. | static_contract | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | No external API assumptions. | Check function signature and operation. | Correct implementation if contract is violated. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 1 | true | false | Stop after contract verification. | 10 | 59 | 2 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000006947 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6947. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 11 | 60 | 3 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006948 | instruction_following | format_constraint | general | hard | hard | en | Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number. | 1932 | 3864 | Identify transformation and output constraint. | Check transformation and requested format. | constraint | passed | passed | passed | No unsupported content. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop when requested format is satisfied. | 12 | 61 | 4 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000000006949 | counterexample | counterexample_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6949. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 13 | 62 | 5 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006950 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6950. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 14 | 63 | 6 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006951 | fact_check | claim_verification | general_knowledge | hard | hard | en | Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence. | A triangle has four sides. | Assessment: Incorrect.
A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source. | Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence. | External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims. | evidence | required | required | Never fabricate a citation. | Identify unsupported factual certainty. | Qualify or verify the claim. | answerable | 0.85 | 0.15 | 3 | true | false | Stop after evidence requirement is identified. | 15 | 64 | 7 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000006952 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6952. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 16 | 65 | 8 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006953 | counterexample | counterexample_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6953. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 0 | 66 | 9 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006954 | logic | deductive_reasoning | logic | hard | hard | en | Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements. | If x > 24, then x is positive.
x = 24.
y = 46. | Conclusion: x is positive.
Result: Yes. | Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion. | Logical consistency check. | symbolic | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Reason only from supplied premises. | Check whether conclusion is entailed. | Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 2 | true | false | Stop once entailment is established. | 1 | 67 | 10 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000006955 | fact_check | claim_verification | general_knowledge | hard | hard | en | Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence. | All metals are liquid at room temperature. | Assessment: Incorrect.
A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source. | Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence. | External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims. | evidence | required | required | Never fabricate a citation. | Identify unsupported factual certainty. | Qualify or verify the claim. | answerable | 0.85 | 0.15 | 3 | true | false | Stop after evidence requirement is identified. | 2 | 68 | 11 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000006956 | counterexample | counterexample_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6956. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 3 | 69 | 12 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006957 | research | research_methodology | climate science | hard | hard | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about climate science. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 4 | 70 | 13 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000006958 | logic | deductive_reasoning | logic | hard | hard | en | Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements. | If x > 91, then x is positive.
x = 91.
y = 38. | Conclusion: x is positive.
Result: Yes. | Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion. | Logical consistency check. | symbolic | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Reason only from supplied premises. | Check whether conclusion is entailed. | Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 2 | true | false | Stop once entailment is established. | 5 | 71 | 14 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000006959 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6959. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 6 | 72 | 15 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006960 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6960. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 7 | 73 | 16 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006961 | math | arithmetic | mathematics | hard | hard | en | Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 765619 + 761975 | 1527594 | Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result. | Exact arithmetic verification. | exact | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied operands. | Check arithmetic operation. | Recompute if mismatch detected. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop after exact verification. | 8 | 74 | 17 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006962 | math | arithmetic | mathematics | hard | hard | en | Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 1423548 ÷ 294 | 1423548 | Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result. | Exact arithmetic verification. | exact | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied operands. | Check arithmetic operation. | Recompute if mismatch detected. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop after exact verification. | 9 | 75 | 18 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006963 | planning | planning_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6963. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 10 | 76 | 19 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006964 | code | function_generation | programming | hard | hard | en | Write Python code that returns the square of an integer. | Input example: n = 6668 | def square(n):
return n * n | Identify required input/output and implement minimal function. | Static code contract check. | static_contract | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | No external API assumptions. | Check function signature and operation. | Correct implementation if contract is violated. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 1 | true | false | Stop after contract verification. | 11 | 77 | 20 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000006965 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6965. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 12 | 78 | 21 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006966 | reasoning | comparison | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values. | A = 85, B = 76 | A is greater than B by 9. | Compare values and compute difference. | Check comparison and difference. | exact | passed | passed | Use only supplied values. | Check comparison direction. | Recompute difference. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after comparison verification. | 13 | 79 | 22 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000006967 | fact_check | claim_verification | general_knowledge | hard | hard | en | Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence. | A triangle has four sides. | Assessment: Incorrect.
A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source. | Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence. | External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims. | evidence | required | required | Never fabricate a citation. | Identify unsupported factual certainty. | Qualify or verify the claim. | answerable | 0.85 | 0.15 | 3 | true | false | Stop after evidence requirement is identified. | 14 | 80 | 23 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000006968 | reasoning | comparison | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values. | A = 91, B = 96 | B is greater than A by 5. | Compare values and compute difference. | Check comparison and difference. | exact | passed | passed | Use only supplied values. | Check comparison direction. | Recompute difference. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after comparison verification. | 15 | 81 | 24 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000006969 | planning | planning_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6969. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 16 | 82 | 25 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006970 | counterexample | counterexample_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6970. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 0 | 83 | 26 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006971 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6971. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 1 | 84 | 27 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006972 | planning | planning_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6972. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 2 | 85 | 28 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006973 | fact_check | claim_verification | general_knowledge | hard | hard | en | Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence. | All metals are liquid at room temperature. | Assessment: Incorrect.
A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source. | Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence. | External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims. | evidence | required | required | Never fabricate a citation. | Identify unsupported factual certainty. | Qualify or verify the claim. | answerable | 0.85 | 0.15 | 3 | true | false | Stop after evidence requirement is identified. | 3 | 86 | 29 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000006974 | fact_check | claim_verification | general_knowledge | hard | hard | en | Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence. | Water freezes at 0°C under standard atmospheric pressure. | Assessment: Correct.
A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source. | Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence. | External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims. | evidence | required | required | Never fabricate a citation. | Identify unsupported factual certainty. | Qualify or verify the claim. | answerable | 0.85 | 0.15 | 3 | true | false | Stop after evidence requirement is identified. | 4 | 87 | 30 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000006975 | fact_check | claim_verification | general_knowledge | very_hard | very_hard | en | Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence. | All metals are liquid at room temperature. | Assessment: Incorrect.
A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source. | Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence. | External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims. | evidence | required | required | Never fabricate a citation. | Identify unsupported factual certainty. | Qualify or verify the claim. | answerable | 0.85 | 0.15 | 3 | true | false | Stop after evidence requirement is identified. | 5 | 88 | 0 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000006976 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6976. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 6 | 89 | 1 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006977 | fact_check | claim_verification | general_knowledge | very_hard | very_hard | en | Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence. | The Earth has one natural satellite. | Assessment: Correct.
A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source. | Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence. | External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims. | evidence | required | required | Never fabricate a citation. | Identify unsupported factual certainty. | Qualify or verify the claim. | answerable | 0.85 | 0.15 | 3 | true | false | Stop after evidence requirement is identified. | 7 | 90 | 2 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000006978 | self_correction | error_repair | mathematics | very_hard | very_hard | en | Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer. | Problem: 84 + 91
Proposed answer: 182 | The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 175. | Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch. | Independent recomputation. | exact | passed | Do not trust the proposed answer without verification. | passed | passed | answerable | 1 | 0 | 3 | true | false | Stop after independent correction. | 8 | 91 | 3 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000000006979 | instruction_following | format_constraint | general | very_hard | very_hard | en | Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number. | 7361 | 14722 | Identify transformation and output constraint. | Check transformation and requested format. | constraint | passed | passed | passed | No unsupported content. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop when requested format is satisfied. | 9 | 92 | 4 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000000006980 | consistency_check | consistency_check_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6980. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 10 | 93 | 5 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006981 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6981. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 11 | 94 | 6 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006982 | ambiguity | ambiguity_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6982. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 12 | 95 | 7 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006983 | evidence_check | evidence_check_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6983. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 13 | 96 | 8 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006984 | logic | deductive_reasoning | logic | very_hard | very_hard | en | Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements. | If x > 47, then x is positive.
x = 47.
y = 78. | Conclusion: x is positive.
Result: Yes. | Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion. | Logical consistency check. | symbolic | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Reason only from supplied premises. | Check whether conclusion is entailed. | Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 2 | true | false | Stop once entailment is established. | 14 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000006985 | consistency_check | consistency_check_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6985. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 15 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006986 | constraint_reasoning | constraint_reasoning_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6986. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 16 | 2 | 11 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006987 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6987. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 0 | 3 | 12 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006988 | counterexample | counterexample_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6988. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 1 | 4 | 13 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006989 | consistency_check | consistency_check_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6989. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 2 | 5 | 14 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006990 | self_correction | error_repair | mathematics | very_hard | very_hard | en | Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer. | Problem: 58 + 60
Proposed answer: 122 | The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 118. | Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch. | Independent recomputation. | exact | passed | Do not trust the proposed answer without verification. | passed | passed | answerable | 1 | 0 | 3 | true | false | Stop after independent correction. | 3 | 6 | 15 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000000006991 | planning | planning_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6991. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 4 | 7 | 16 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006992 | planning | planning_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6992. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 5 | 8 | 17 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006993 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6993. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 6 | 9 | 18 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006994 | ambiguity | ambiguity_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6994. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 7 | 10 | 19 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006995 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | extreme | extreme | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6995. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 8 | 11 | 20 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006996 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | extreme | extreme | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6996. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 9 | 12 | 21 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006997 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | extreme | extreme | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6997. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 10 | 13 | 22 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000006998 | logic | deductive_reasoning | logic | extreme | extreme | en | Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements. | If x > 25, then x is positive.
x = 25.
y = 6. | Conclusion: x is positive.
Result: Yes. | Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion. | Logical consistency check. | symbolic | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Reason only from supplied premises. | Check whether conclusion is entailed. | Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 2 | true | false | Stop once entailment is established. | 11 | 14 | 23 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000006999 | consistency_check | consistency_check_analysis | general_reasoning | extreme | extreme | en | Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent. | Synthetic evaluation instance 6999. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 12 | 15 | 24 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.