id
stringlengths
16
16
task_family
stringclasses
20 values
task_type
stringclasses
20 values
domain
stringclasses
14 values
difficulty
stringclasses
5 values
difficulty_label
stringclasses
5 values
language
stringclasses
1 value
instruction
stringlengths
54
90
context
stringlengths
0
82
response
stringlengths
1
330
analysis_plan
stringclasses
10 values
verification
stringclasses
10 values
verification_type
stringclasses
7 values
prompt_review
stringclasses
2 values
prompt_alignment
stringclasses
3 values
constraint_check
stringclasses
3 values
consistency_check
stringclasses
2 values
math_check
stringclasses
3 values
logic_check
stringclasses
3 values
counterexample_check
stringclasses
2 values
data_analysis_check
stringclasses
3 values
code_check
stringclasses
3 values
evidence_check
stringclasses
3 values
source_check
stringclasses
3 values
hallucination_control
stringclasses
10 values
error_detection
stringclasses
10 values
error_repair
stringclasses
10 values
answerability
stringclasses
2 values
confidence
float32
0.85
1
uncertainty
float32
0
0.15
reasoning_depth
int16
1
4
minimal_sufficient_reasoning
bool
1 class
unnecessary_reasoning
bool
1 class
stop_condition
stringclasses
10 values
surface_variation
int32
0
16
numeric_variation
int32
0
96
structure_variation
int32
0
30
ood_style
int32
0
12
quality_score
float32
0.9
0.9
synthetic
bool
1 class
license
stringclasses
1 value
generator_version
stringclasses
1 value
mtd-000000007100
ambiguity
ambiguity_analysis
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7100. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
11
19
1
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007101
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7101. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
12
20
2
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007102
planning
planning_analysis
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7102. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
13
21
3
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007103
data_analysis
descriptive_statistics
statistics
easy
easy
en
Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset.
Dataset: 48, 33, 54, 4, 76
Mean = 43.0000
Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify.
Recompute sum and count.
exact
passed
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied dataset.
Check arithmetic and denominator.
Recompute statistic.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after numerical verification.
14
22
4
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007104
generalization
generalization_analysis
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7104. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
15
23
5
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007105
generalization
generalization_analysis
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7105. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
16
24
6
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007106
adversarial
adversarial_analysis
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7106. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
0
25
7
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007107
constraint_reasoning
constraint_reasoning_analysis
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7107. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
1
26
8
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007108
fact_check
claim_verification
general_knowledge
easy
easy
en
Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence.
The Earth has one natural satellite.
Assessment: Correct. A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source.
Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence.
External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims.
evidence
required
required
Never fabricate a citation.
Identify unsupported factual certainty.
Qualify or verify the claim.
answerable
0.85
0.15
3
true
false
Stop after evidence requirement is identified.
2
27
9
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007109
math
arithmetic
mathematics
easy
easy
en
Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 403050 - 263802
139248
Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result.
Exact arithmetic verification.
exact
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied operands.
Check arithmetic operation.
Recompute if mismatch detected.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop after exact verification.
3
28
10
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007110
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7110. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
4
29
11
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007111
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7111. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
5
30
12
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007112
counterexample
counterexample_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7112. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
6
31
13
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007113
generalization
generalization_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7113. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
7
32
14
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007114
math
arithmetic
mathematics
medium
medium
en
Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 647314 - 79798
567516
Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result.
Exact arithmetic verification.
exact
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied operands.
Check arithmetic operation.
Recompute if mismatch detected.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop after exact verification.
8
33
15
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007115
fact_check
claim_verification
general_knowledge
medium
medium
en
Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence.
The Earth has one natural satellite.
Assessment: Correct. A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source.
Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence.
External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims.
evidence
required
required
Never fabricate a citation.
Identify unsupported factual certainty.
Qualify or verify the claim.
answerable
0.85
0.15
3
true
false
Stop after evidence requirement is identified.
9
34
16
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007116
research
research_methodology
astronomy
medium
medium
en
Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about astronomy.
The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty.
1. Define the research question precisely. 2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses. 3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources. 4. Record provenance for each important claim. 5. Compare independent evidence. 6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations. 7. Report conclusions separately from obs...
Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty.
Methodological consistency check.
methodological
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
required
required
Do not invent sources or findings.
Detect unsupported claims.
Remove or qualify unsupported claims.
answerable
0.92
0.08
4
true
false
Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent.
10
35
17
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007117
adversarial
adversarial_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7117. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
11
36
18
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007118
generalization
generalization_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7118. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
12
37
19
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007119
calibration
calibration_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7119. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
13
38
20
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007120
reasoning
comparison
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values.
A = 73, B = 32
A is greater than B by 41.
Compare values and compute difference.
Check comparison and difference.
exact
passed
passed
Use only supplied values.
Check comparison direction.
Recompute difference.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after comparison verification.
14
39
21
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007121
fact_check
claim_verification
general_knowledge
medium
medium
en
Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence.
The Earth has one natural satellite.
Assessment: Correct. A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source.
Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence.
External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims.
evidence
required
required
Never fabricate a citation.
Identify unsupported factual certainty.
Qualify or verify the claim.
answerable
0.85
0.15
3
true
false
Stop after evidence requirement is identified.
15
40
22
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007122
generalization
generalization_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7122. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
16
41
23
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007123
planning
planning_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7123. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
0
42
24
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007124
code
function_generation
programming
medium
medium
en
Write Python code that returns the square of an integer.
Input example: n = 44782
def square(n): return n * n
Identify required input/output and implement minimal function.
Static code contract check.
static_contract
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
No external API assumptions.
Check function signature and operation.
Correct implementation if contract is violated.
answerable
0.99
0.01
1
true
false
Stop after contract verification.
1
43
25
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007125
code
function_generation
programming
medium
medium
en
Write Python code that returns the square of an integer.
Input example: n = 51904
def square(n): return n * n
Identify required input/output and implement minimal function.
Static code contract check.
static_contract
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
No external API assumptions.
Check function signature and operation.
Correct implementation if contract is violated.
answerable
0.99
0.01
1
true
false
Stop after contract verification.
2
44
26
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007126
logic
deductive_reasoning
logic
medium
medium
en
Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements.
If x > 35, then x is positive. x = 35. y = 89.
Conclusion: x is positive. Result: Yes.
Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion.
Logical consistency check.
symbolic
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Reason only from supplied premises.
Check whether conclusion is entailed.
Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts.
answerable
0.99
0.01
2
true
false
Stop once entailment is established.
3
45
27
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007127
logic
deductive_reasoning
logic
medium
medium
en
Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements.
If x > 6, then x is positive. x = 6. y = 89.
Conclusion: x is positive. Result: Yes.
Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion.
Logical consistency check.
symbolic
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Reason only from supplied premises.
Check whether conclusion is entailed.
Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts.
answerable
0.99
0.01
2
true
false
Stop once entailment is established.
4
46
28
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007128
logic
deductive_reasoning
logic
medium
medium
en
Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements.
If x > 80, then x is positive. x = 80. y = 40.
Conclusion: x is positive. Result: Yes.
Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion.
Logical consistency check.
symbolic
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Reason only from supplied premises.
Check whether conclusion is entailed.
Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts.
answerable
0.99
0.01
2
true
false
Stop once entailment is established.
5
47
29
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007129
error_analysis
error_analysis_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7129. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
6
48
30
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007130
calibration
calibration_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7130. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
7
49
0
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007131
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7131. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
8
50
1
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007132
research
research_methodology
climate science
medium
medium
en
Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about climate science.
The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty.
1. Define the research question precisely. 2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses. 3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources. 4. Record provenance for each important claim. 5. Compare independent evidence. 6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations. 7. Report conclusions separately from obs...
Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty.
Methodological consistency check.
methodological
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
required
required
Do not invent sources or findings.
Detect unsupported claims.
Remove or qualify unsupported claims.
answerable
0.92
0.08
4
true
false
Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent.
9
51
2
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007133
prompt_review
prompt_review_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7133. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
10
52
3
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007134
planning
planning_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7134. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
11
53
4
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007135
math
arithmetic
mathematics
medium
medium
en
Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 615 × 123
75645
Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result.
Exact arithmetic verification.
exact
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied operands.
Check arithmetic operation.
Recompute if mismatch detected.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop after exact verification.
12
54
5
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007136
constraint_reasoning
constraint_reasoning_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7136. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
13
55
6
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007137
planning
planning_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7137. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
14
56
7
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007138
reasoning
comparison
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values.
A = 39, B = 96
B is greater than A by 57.
Compare values and compute difference.
Check comparison and difference.
exact
passed
passed
Use only supplied values.
Check comparison direction.
Recompute difference.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after comparison verification.
15
57
8
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007139
planning
planning_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7139. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
16
58
9
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007140
fact_check
claim_verification
general_knowledge
hard
hard
en
Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence.
A triangle has four sides.
Assessment: Incorrect. A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source.
Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence.
External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims.
evidence
required
required
Never fabricate a citation.
Identify unsupported factual certainty.
Qualify or verify the claim.
answerable
0.85
0.15
3
true
false
Stop after evidence requirement is identified.
0
59
10
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007141
code
function_generation
programming
hard
hard
en
Write Python code that returns the square of an integer.
Input example: n = 52907
def square(n): return n * n
Identify required input/output and implement minimal function.
Static code contract check.
static_contract
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
No external API assumptions.
Check function signature and operation.
Correct implementation if contract is violated.
answerable
0.99
0.01
1
true
false
Stop after contract verification.
1
60
11
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007142
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
hard
hard
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 10 + 69 Proposed answer: 84
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 79.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
2
61
12
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007143
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7143. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
3
62
13
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007144
planning
planning_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7144. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
4
63
14
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007145
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7145. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
5
64
15
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007146
research
research_methodology
economics
hard
hard
en
Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about economics.
The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty.
1. Define the research question precisely. 2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses. 3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources. 4. Record provenance for each important claim. 5. Compare independent evidence. 6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations. 7. Report conclusions separately from obs...
Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty.
Methodological consistency check.
methodological
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
required
required
Do not invent sources or findings.
Detect unsupported claims.
Remove or qualify unsupported claims.
answerable
0.92
0.08
4
true
false
Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent.
6
65
16
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007147
adversarial
adversarial_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7147. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
7
66
17
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007148
ambiguity
ambiguity_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7148. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
8
67
18
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007149
logic
deductive_reasoning
logic
hard
hard
en
Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements.
If x > 29, then x is positive. x = 29. y = 80.
Conclusion: x is positive. Result: Yes.
Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion.
Logical consistency check.
symbolic
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Reason only from supplied premises.
Check whether conclusion is entailed.
Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts.
answerable
0.99
0.01
2
true
false
Stop once entailment is established.
9
68
19
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007150
adversarial
adversarial_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7150. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
10
69
20
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007151
adversarial
adversarial_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7151. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
11
70
21
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007152
constraint_reasoning
constraint_reasoning_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7152. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
12
71
22
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007153
data_analysis
descriptive_statistics
statistics
hard
hard
en
Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset.
Dataset: 41, 73, 60, 90, 49
Mean = 62.6000
Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify.
Recompute sum and count.
exact
passed
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied dataset.
Check arithmetic and denominator.
Recompute statistic.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after numerical verification.
13
72
23
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007154
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7154. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
14
73
24
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007155
research
research_methodology
climate science
hard
hard
en
Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about climate science.
The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty.
1. Define the research question precisely. 2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses. 3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources. 4. Record provenance for each important claim. 5. Compare independent evidence. 6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations. 7. Report conclusions separately from obs...
Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty.
Methodological consistency check.
methodological
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
required
required
Do not invent sources or findings.
Detect unsupported claims.
Remove or qualify unsupported claims.
answerable
0.92
0.08
4
true
false
Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent.
15
74
25
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007156
data_analysis
descriptive_statistics
statistics
hard
hard
en
Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset.
Dataset: 26, 19, 93, 38, 57
Mean = 46.6000
Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify.
Recompute sum and count.
exact
passed
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied dataset.
Check arithmetic and denominator.
Recompute statistic.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after numerical verification.
16
75
26
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007157
math
arithmetic
mathematics
hard
hard
en
Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 642675 + 508771
1151446
Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result.
Exact arithmetic verification.
exact
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied operands.
Check arithmetic operation.
Recompute if mismatch detected.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop after exact verification.
0
76
27
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007158
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7158. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
1
77
28
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007159
math
arithmetic
mathematics
hard
hard
en
Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 5705 × 353
2013865
Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result.
Exact arithmetic verification.
exact
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied operands.
Check arithmetic operation.
Recompute if mismatch detected.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop after exact verification.
2
78
29
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007160
prompt_review
prompt_review_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7160. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
3
79
30
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007161
code
function_generation
programming
hard
hard
en
Write Python code that returns the square of an integer.
Input example: n = 41309
def square(n): return n * n
Identify required input/output and implement minimal function.
Static code contract check.
static_contract
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
No external API assumptions.
Check function signature and operation.
Correct implementation if contract is violated.
answerable
0.99
0.01
1
true
false
Stop after contract verification.
4
80
0
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007162
error_analysis
error_analysis_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7162. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
5
81
1
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007163
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7163. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
6
82
2
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007164
research
research_methodology
climate science
hard
hard
en
Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about climate science.
The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty.
1. Define the research question precisely. 2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses. 3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources. 4. Record provenance for each important claim. 5. Compare independent evidence. 6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations. 7. Report conclusions separately from obs...
Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty.
Methodological consistency check.
methodological
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
required
required
Do not invent sources or findings.
Detect unsupported claims.
Remove or qualify unsupported claims.
answerable
0.92
0.08
4
true
false
Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent.
7
83
3
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007165
counterexample
counterexample_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7165. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
8
84
4
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007166
code
function_generation
programming
hard
hard
en
Write Python code that returns the square of an integer.
Input example: n = 91232
def square(n): return n * n
Identify required input/output and implement minimal function.
Static code contract check.
static_contract
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
No external API assumptions.
Check function signature and operation.
Correct implementation if contract is violated.
answerable
0.99
0.01
1
true
false
Stop after contract verification.
9
85
5
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007167
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7167. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
10
86
6
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007168
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7168. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
11
87
7
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007169
adversarial
adversarial_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7169. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
12
88
8
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007170
adversarial
adversarial_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7170. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
13
89
9
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007171
instruction_following
format_constraint
general
hard
hard
en
Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number.
3174
6348
Identify transformation and output constraint.
Check transformation and requested format.
constraint
passed
passed
passed
No unsupported content.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop when requested format is satisfied.
14
90
10
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007172
calibration
calibration_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7172. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
15
91
11
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007173
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7173. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
16
92
12
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007174
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7174. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
0
93
13
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007175
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
very_hard
very_hard
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 23 + 73 Proposed answer: 103
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 96.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
1
94
14
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007176
math
arithmetic
mathematics
very_hard
very_hard
en
Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 813932 ÷ 164
813932
Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result.
Exact arithmetic verification.
exact
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied operands.
Check arithmetic operation.
Recompute if mismatch detected.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop after exact verification.
2
95
15
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007177
data_analysis
descriptive_statistics
statistics
very_hard
very_hard
en
Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset.
Dataset: 47, 57, 35, 16, 79
Mean = 46.8000
Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify.
Recompute sum and count.
exact
passed
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied dataset.
Check arithmetic and denominator.
Recompute statistic.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after numerical verification.
3
96
16
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007178
error_analysis
error_analysis_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7178. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
4
0
17
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007179
calibration
calibration_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7179. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
5
1
18
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007180
counterexample
counterexample_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7180. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
6
2
19
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007181
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7181. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
7
3
20
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007182
adversarial
adversarial_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7182. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
8
4
21
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007183
ambiguity
ambiguity_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7183. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
9
5
22
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007184
fact_check
claim_verification
general_knowledge
very_hard
very_hard
en
Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence.
The Earth has one natural satellite.
Assessment: Correct. A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source.
Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence.
External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims.
evidence
required
required
Never fabricate a citation.
Identify unsupported factual certainty.
Qualify or verify the claim.
answerable
0.85
0.15
3
true
false
Stop after evidence requirement is identified.
10
6
23
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007185
generalization
generalization_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7185. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
11
7
24
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007186
math
arithmetic
mathematics
very_hard
very_hard
en
Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 2873646 ÷ 306
2873646
Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result.
Exact arithmetic verification.
exact
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied operands.
Check arithmetic operation.
Recompute if mismatch detected.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop after exact verification.
12
8
25
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007187
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7187. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
13
9
26
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007188
ambiguity
ambiguity_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7188. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
14
10
27
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007189
instruction_following
format_constraint
general
very_hard
very_hard
en
Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number.
9736
19472
Identify transformation and output constraint.
Check transformation and requested format.
constraint
passed
passed
passed
No unsupported content.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop when requested format is satisfied.
15
11
28
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007190
data_analysis
descriptive_statistics
statistics
very_hard
very_hard
en
Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset.
Dataset: 40, 5, 32, 61, 29
Mean = 33.4000
Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify.
Recompute sum and count.
exact
passed
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied dataset.
Check arithmetic and denominator.
Recompute statistic.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after numerical verification.
16
12
29
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007191
research
research_methodology
astronomy
very_hard
very_hard
en
Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about astronomy.
The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty.
1. Define the research question precisely. 2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses. 3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources. 4. Record provenance for each important claim. 5. Compare independent evidence. 6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations. 7. Report conclusions separately from obs...
Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty.
Methodological consistency check.
methodological
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
required
required
Do not invent sources or findings.
Detect unsupported claims.
Remove or qualify unsupported claims.
answerable
0.92
0.08
4
true
false
Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent.
0
13
30
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007192
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7192. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
1
14
0
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007193
constraint_reasoning
constraint_reasoning_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7193. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
2
15
1
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007194
ambiguity
ambiguity_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7194. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
3
16
2
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007195
prompt_review
prompt_review_analysis
general_reasoning
extreme
extreme
en
Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7195. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
4
17
3
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007196
instruction_following
format_constraint
general
extreme
extreme
en
Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number.
6855
13710
Identify transformation and output constraint.
Check transformation and requested format.
constraint
passed
passed
passed
No unsupported content.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop when requested format is satisfied.
5
18
4
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007197
research
research_methodology
computer security
extreme
extreme
en
Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about computer security.
The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty.
1. Define the research question precisely. 2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses. 3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources. 4. Record provenance for each important claim. 5. Compare independent evidence. 6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations. 7. Report conclusions separately from obs...
Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty.
Methodological consistency check.
methodological
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
required
required
Do not invent sources or findings.
Detect unsupported claims.
Remove or qualify unsupported claims.
answerable
0.92
0.08
4
true
false
Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent.
6
19
5
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007198
planning
planning_analysis
general_reasoning
extreme
extreme
en
Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem.
Synthetic evaluation instance 7198. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
7
20
6
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000007199
logic
deductive_reasoning
logic
extreme
extreme
en
Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements.
If x > 11, then x is positive. x = 11. y = 3.
Conclusion: x is positive. Result: Yes.
Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion.
Logical consistency check.
symbolic
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Reason only from supplied premises.
Check whether conclusion is entailed.
Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts.
answerable
0.99
0.01
2
true
false
Stop once entailment is established.
8
21
7
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1