subject stringlengths 5 9 | predicate stringclasses 21
values | object stringlengths 2 4.68k | source stringclasses 1
value | object_type stringclasses 6
values | meta stringlengths 0 10.5k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1035 | belongs-to-tactic | TA0002 | attack | id | |
T1035 | created | 2017-05-31 21:30:36.550000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1035 | created | 2018-10-17 00:14:20.652000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1035 | deprecated | true | attack | boolean | |
T1035 | description | Adversaries may execute a binary, command, or script via a method that interacts with Windows services, such as the Service Control Manager. This can be done by either creating a new service or modifying an existing service. This technique is the execution used in conjunction with [New Service](https://attack.mitre.org... | attack | string | |
T1035 | description | Ensure that permissions disallow services that run at a higher permissions level from being created or interacted with by a user with a lower permission level. Also ensure that high permission level service binaries cannot be replaced or modified by users with a lower permission level.
Identify unnecessary system util... | attack | string | |
T1035 | domain | enterprise-attack | attack | string | |
T1035 | domain | enterprise-attack | attack | string | |
T1035 | is-subtechnique | false | attack | boolean | |
T1035 | modified | 2025-10-24 17:49:36.592000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1035 | modified | 2025-04-18 18:00:16.585000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1035 | name | Service Execution | attack | string | |
T1035 | name | Service Execution Mitigation | attack | string | |
T1035 | platform | Windows | attack | string | |
T1035 | rdf:type | Technique | attack | enum | {"version":"1.1"} |
T1035 | rdf:type | Mitigation | attack | enum | {"version":"1.0","external_references":[{"url":"http://www.sans.org/reading-room/whitepapers/application/application-whitelisting-panacea-propaganda-33599","source_name":"Beechey 2010","description":"Beechey, J. (2010, December). Application Whitelisting: Panacea or Propaganda?. Retrieved November 18, 2014."},{"url":"h... |
T1035 | revoked | true | attack | boolean | |
T1035 | revoked-by | T1569.002 | attack | id | |
T1035 | url | https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1035 | attack | url | |
T1035 | url | https://attack.mitre.org/mitigations/T1035 | attack | url | |
T1036 | belongs-to-tactic | TA0005 | attack | id | |
T1036 | created | 2017-05-31 21:30:38.511000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1036 | created | 2018-10-17 00:14:20.652000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1036 | deprecated | true | attack | boolean | |
T1036 | description | Adversaries may attempt to manipulate features of their artifacts to make them appear legitimate or benign to users and/or security tools. Masquerading occurs when the name or location of an object, legitimate or malicious, is manipulated or abused for the sake of evading defenses and observation. This may include mani... | attack | string | |
T1036 | description | When creating security rules, avoid exclusions based on file name or file path. Require signed binaries. Use file system access controls to protect folders such as C:\Windows\System32. Use tools that restrict program execution via whitelisting by attributes other than file name.
Identify potentially malicious software... | attack | string | |
T1036 | domain | enterprise-attack | attack | string | |
T1036 | domain | enterprise-attack | attack | string | |
T1036 | is-subtechnique | false | attack | boolean | |
T1036 | modified | 2026-05-12 15:12:00.629000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1036 | modified | 2025-04-18 17:59:52.994000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1036 | name | Masquerading | attack | string | |
T1036 | name | Masquerading Mitigation | attack | string | |
T1036 | platform | Containers | attack | string | |
T1036 | platform | ESXi | attack | string | |
T1036 | platform | Linux | attack | string | |
T1036 | platform | macOS | attack | string | |
T1036 | platform | Windows | attack | string | |
T1036 | rdf:type | Technique | attack | enum | {"version":"2.0","external_references":[{"url":"https://lolbas-project.github.io/","source_name":"LOLBAS Main Site","description":"LOLBAS. (n.d.). Living Off The Land Binaries and Scripts (and also Libraries). Retrieved February 10, 2020."}]} |
T1036 | rdf:type | Mitigation | attack | enum | {"version":"1.0","external_references":[{"url":"http://www.sans.org/reading-room/whitepapers/application/application-whitelisting-panacea-propaganda-33599","source_name":"Beechey 2010","description":"Beechey, J. (2010, December). Application Whitelisting: Panacea or Propaganda?. Retrieved November 18, 2014."},{"url":"h... |
T1036 | url | https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1036 | attack | url | |
T1036 | url | https://attack.mitre.org/mitigations/T1036 | attack | url | |
T1036.001 | belongs-to-tactic | TA0005 | attack | id | |
T1036.001 | created | 2020-02-10 19:49:46.752000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1036.001 | description | Adversaries may attempt to mimic features of valid code signatures to increase the chance of deceiving a user, analyst, or tool. Code signing provides a level of authenticity on a binary from the developer and a guarantee that the binary has not been tampered with. Adversaries can copy the metadata and signature inform... | attack | string | |
T1036.001 | domain | enterprise-attack | attack | string | |
T1036.001 | is-subtechnique | true | attack | boolean | |
T1036.001 | modified | 2026-05-12 15:12:00.709000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1036.001 | name | Invalid Code Signature | attack | string | |
T1036.001 | platform | macOS | attack | string | |
T1036.001 | platform | Windows | attack | string | |
T1036.001 | rdf:type | Technique | attack | enum | {"version":"2.0","external_references":[{"url":"https://threatexpress.com/blogs/2017/metatwin-borrowing-microsoft-metadata-and-digital-signatures-to-hide-binaries/","source_name":"Threatexpress MetaTwin 2017","description":"Vest, J. (2017, October 9). Borrowing Microsoft MetaData and Signatures to Hide Binary Payloads.... |
T1036.001 | subtechnique-of | T1036 | attack | id | |
T1036.001 | url | https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1036/001 | attack | url | |
T1036.002 | belongs-to-tactic | TA0005 | attack | id | |
T1036.002 | created | 2020-02-10 19:55:29.385000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1036.002 | description | Adversaries may abuse the right-to-left override (RTLO or RLO) character (U+202E) to disguise a string and/or file name to make it appear benign. RTLO is a non-printing Unicode character that causes the text that follows it to be displayed in reverse. For example, a Windows screensaver executable named <code>March 25 \... | attack | string | |
T1036.002 | domain | enterprise-attack | attack | string | |
T1036.002 | is-subtechnique | true | attack | boolean | |
T1036.002 | modified | 2026-05-12 15:12:00.643000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1036.002 | name | Right-to-Left Override | attack | string | |
T1036.002 | platform | Linux | attack | string | |
T1036.002 | platform | macOS | attack | string | |
T1036.002 | platform | Windows | attack | string | |
T1036.002 | rdf:type | Technique | attack | enum | {"version":"2.0","external_references":[{"url":"https://blog.trendmicro.com/trendlabs-security-intelligence/plead-targeted-attacks-against-taiwanese-government-agencies-2/","source_name":"Trend Micro PLEAD RTLO","description":"Alintanahin, K.. (2014, May 23). PLEAD Targeted Attacks Against Taiwanese Government Agencies... |
T1036.002 | subtechnique-of | T1036 | attack | id | |
T1036.002 | url | https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1036/002 | attack | url | |
T1036.003 | belongs-to-tactic | TA0005 | attack | id | |
T1036.003 | created | 2020-02-10 20:03:11.691000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1036.003 | description | Adversaries may rename legitimate / system utilities to try to evade security mechanisms concerning the usage of those utilities. Security monitoring and control mechanisms may be in place for legitimate utilities adversaries are capable of abusing, including both built-in binaries and tools such as PSExec, AutoHotKey,... | attack | string | |
T1036.003 | domain | enterprise-attack | attack | string | |
T1036.003 | is-subtechnique | true | attack | boolean | |
T1036.003 | modified | 2026-05-12 15:12:00.713000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1036.003 | name | Rename Legitimate Utilities | attack | string | |
T1036.003 | platform | Linux | attack | string | |
T1036.003 | platform | macOS | attack | string | |
T1036.003 | platform | Windows | attack | string | |
T1036.003 | rdf:type | Technique | attack | enum | {"version":"3.0","external_references":[{"url":"https://www.elastic.co/blog/how-hunt-masquerade-ball","source_name":"Elastic Masquerade Ball","description":"Ewing, P. (2016, October 31). How to Hunt: The Masquerade Ball. Retrieved October 31, 2016."},{"url":"https://www.f-secure.com/documents/996508/1030745/CozyDuke","... |
T1036.003 | subtechnique-of | T1036 | attack | id | |
T1036.003 | url | https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1036/003 | attack | url | |
T1036.004 | belongs-to-tactic | TA0005 | attack | id | |
T1036.004 | created | 2020-02-10 20:30:07.426000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1036.004 | description | Adversaries may attempt to manipulate the name of a task or service to make it appear legitimate or benign. Tasks/services executed by the Task Scheduler or systemd will typically be given a name and/or description.(Citation: TechNet Schtasks)(Citation: Systemd Service Units) Windows services will have a service name a... | attack | string | |
T1036.004 | domain | enterprise-attack | attack | string | |
T1036.004 | is-subtechnique | true | attack | boolean | |
T1036.004 | modified | 2026-05-12 15:12:00.644000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1036.004 | name | Masquerade Task or Service | attack | string | |
T1036.004 | platform | Linux | attack | string | |
T1036.004 | platform | macOS | attack | string | |
T1036.004 | platform | Windows | attack | string | |
T1036.004 | rdf:type | Technique | attack | enum | {"version":"2.0","external_references":[{"url":"https://vms.drweb.com/virus/?i=4276269","source_name":"Fysbis Dr Web Analysis","description":"Doctor Web. (2014, November 21). Linux.BackDoor.Fysbis.1. Retrieved December 7, 2017."},{"url":"http://researchcenter.paloaltonetworks.com/2016/11/unit42-shamoon-2-return-disttra... |
T1036.004 | subtechnique-of | T1036 | attack | id | |
T1036.004 | url | https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1036/004 | attack | url | |
T1036.005 | belongs-to-tactic | TA0005 | attack | id | |
T1036.005 | created | 2020-02-10 20:43:10.239000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1036.005 | description | Adversaries may match or approximate the name or location of legitimate files, Registry keys, or other resources when naming/placing them. This is done for the sake of evading defenses and observation.
This may be done by placing an executable in a commonly trusted directory (ex: under System32) or giving it the name... | attack | string | |
T1036.005 | domain | enterprise-attack | attack | string | |
T1036.005 | is-subtechnique | true | attack | boolean | |
T1036.005 | modified | 2026-05-12 15:12:00.622000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1036.005 | name | Match Legitimate Resource Name or Location | attack | string |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.