instruction stringlengths 209 9.87k | response stringlengths 2 279 | text stringlengths 290 9.95k |
|---|---|---|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of March 23, 2011, there were a total of 20,722 registered voters in Plainfield, of which 12,078 (58.3% vs. 41.8% countywide) were registered as Democratic Party (United States), 947 (4.6% vs. 15.3%) were registered as Republican Party (United States) and 7,693 (37.1% vs. 42.9%) were registered as Unaffiliated (New Jersey). There were 4 voters registered to other parties. Among the citys 2010 Census population, 41.6% (vs. 53.3% in Union County) were registered to vote, including 56.1% of those ages 18 and over (vs. 70.6% countywide).
Question: How many registered voters were not Democrat, Republican or unaffiliated? | 4 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of March 23, 2011, there were a total of 20,722 registered voters in Plainfield, of which 12,078 (58.3% vs. 41.8% countywide) were registered as Democratic Party (United States), 947 (4.6% vs. 15.3%) were registered as Republican Party (United States) and 7,693 (37.1% vs. 42.9%) were registered as Unaffiliated (New Jersey). There were 4 voters registered to other parties. Among the citys 2010 Census population, 41.6% (vs. 53.3% in Union County) were registered to vote, including 56.1% of those ages 18 and over (vs. 70.6% countywide).
Question: How many registered voters were not Democrat, Republican or unaffiliated?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
4<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of March 23, 2011, there were a total of 20,722 registered voters in Plainfield, of which 12,078 (58.3% vs. 41.8% countywide) were registered as Democratic Party (United States), 947 (4.6% vs. 15.3%) were registered as Republican Party (United States) and 7,693 (37.1% vs. 42.9%) were registered as Unaffiliated (New Jersey). There were 4 voters registered to other parties. Among the citys 2010 Census population, 41.6% (vs. 53.3% in Union County) were registered to vote, including 56.1% of those ages 18 and over (vs. 70.6% countywide).
Question: How many registered voters were not Republican or unaffiliated? | 12082 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of March 23, 2011, there were a total of 20,722 registered voters in Plainfield, of which 12,078 (58.3% vs. 41.8% countywide) were registered as Democratic Party (United States), 947 (4.6% vs. 15.3%) were registered as Republican Party (United States) and 7,693 (37.1% vs. 42.9%) were registered as Unaffiliated (New Jersey). There were 4 voters registered to other parties. Among the citys 2010 Census population, 41.6% (vs. 53.3% in Union County) were registered to vote, including 56.1% of those ages 18 and over (vs. 70.6% countywide).
Question: How many registered voters were not Republican or unaffiliated?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
12082<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of March 23, 2011, there were a total of 20,722 registered voters in Plainfield, of which 12,078 (58.3% vs. 41.8% countywide) were registered as Democratic Party (United States), 947 (4.6% vs. 15.3%) were registered as Republican Party (United States) and 7,693 (37.1% vs. 42.9%) were registered as Unaffiliated (New Jersey). There were 4 voters registered to other parties. Among the citys 2010 Census population, 41.6% (vs. 53.3% in Union County) were registered to vote, including 56.1% of those ages 18 and over (vs. 70.6% countywide).
Question: How many registered voters were not Deomcrat or unaffiliated? | 951 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of March 23, 2011, there were a total of 20,722 registered voters in Plainfield, of which 12,078 (58.3% vs. 41.8% countywide) were registered as Democratic Party (United States), 947 (4.6% vs. 15.3%) were registered as Republican Party (United States) and 7,693 (37.1% vs. 42.9%) were registered as Unaffiliated (New Jersey). There were 4 voters registered to other parties. Among the citys 2010 Census population, 41.6% (vs. 53.3% in Union County) were registered to vote, including 56.1% of those ages 18 and over (vs. 70.6% countywide).
Question: How many registered voters were not Deomcrat or unaffiliated?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
951<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of March 23, 2011, there were a total of 20,722 registered voters in Plainfield, of which 12,078 (58.3% vs. 41.8% countywide) were registered as Democratic Party (United States), 947 (4.6% vs. 15.3%) were registered as Republican Party (United States) and 7,693 (37.1% vs. 42.9%) were registered as Unaffiliated (New Jersey). There were 4 voters registered to other parties. Among the citys 2010 Census population, 41.6% (vs. 53.3% in Union County) were registered to vote, including 56.1% of those ages 18 and over (vs. 70.6% countywide).
Question: How many registered voters were not Deomcrat or other? | 8640 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of March 23, 2011, there were a total of 20,722 registered voters in Plainfield, of which 12,078 (58.3% vs. 41.8% countywide) were registered as Democratic Party (United States), 947 (4.6% vs. 15.3%) were registered as Republican Party (United States) and 7,693 (37.1% vs. 42.9%) were registered as Unaffiliated (New Jersey). There were 4 voters registered to other parties. Among the citys 2010 Census population, 41.6% (vs. 53.3% in Union County) were registered to vote, including 56.1% of those ages 18 and over (vs. 70.6% countywide).
Question: How many registered voters were not Deomcrat or other?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
8640<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of March 23, 2011, there were a total of 20,722 registered voters in Plainfield, of which 12,078 (58.3% vs. 41.8% countywide) were registered as Democratic Party (United States), 947 (4.6% vs. 15.3%) were registered as Republican Party (United States) and 7,693 (37.1% vs. 42.9%) were registered as Unaffiliated (New Jersey). There were 4 voters registered to other parties. Among the citys 2010 Census population, 41.6% (vs. 53.3% in Union County) were registered to vote, including 56.1% of those ages 18 and over (vs. 70.6% countywide).
Question: How many registered voters were not Republican, unaffiliated or other? | 12078 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of March 23, 2011, there were a total of 20,722 registered voters in Plainfield, of which 12,078 (58.3% vs. 41.8% countywide) were registered as Democratic Party (United States), 947 (4.6% vs. 15.3%) were registered as Republican Party (United States) and 7,693 (37.1% vs. 42.9%) were registered as Unaffiliated (New Jersey). There were 4 voters registered to other parties. Among the citys 2010 Census population, 41.6% (vs. 53.3% in Union County) were registered to vote, including 56.1% of those ages 18 and over (vs. 70.6% countywide).
Question: How many registered voters were not Republican, unaffiliated or other?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
12078<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of March 23, 2011, there were a total of 20,722 registered voters in Plainfield, of which 12,078 (58.3% vs. 41.8% countywide) were registered as Democratic Party (United States), 947 (4.6% vs. 15.3%) were registered as Republican Party (United States) and 7,693 (37.1% vs. 42.9%) were registered as Unaffiliated (New Jersey). There were 4 voters registered to other parties. Among the citys 2010 Census population, 41.6% (vs. 53.3% in Union County) were registered to vote, including 56.1% of those ages 18 and over (vs. 70.6% countywide).
Question: How many registered voters were Democrat and Republican? | 13025 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of March 23, 2011, there were a total of 20,722 registered voters in Plainfield, of which 12,078 (58.3% vs. 41.8% countywide) were registered as Democratic Party (United States), 947 (4.6% vs. 15.3%) were registered as Republican Party (United States) and 7,693 (37.1% vs. 42.9%) were registered as Unaffiliated (New Jersey). There were 4 voters registered to other parties. Among the citys 2010 Census population, 41.6% (vs. 53.3% in Union County) were registered to vote, including 56.1% of those ages 18 and over (vs. 70.6% countywide).
Question: How many registered voters were Democrat and Republican?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
13025<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of March 23, 2011, there were a total of 20,722 registered voters in Plainfield, of which 12,078 (58.3% vs. 41.8% countywide) were registered as Democratic Party (United States), 947 (4.6% vs. 15.3%) were registered as Republican Party (United States) and 7,693 (37.1% vs. 42.9%) were registered as Unaffiliated (New Jersey). There were 4 voters registered to other parties. Among the citys 2010 Census population, 41.6% (vs. 53.3% in Union County) were registered to vote, including 56.1% of those ages 18 and over (vs. 70.6% countywide).
Question: How many registered voters were Democrat, Republican and unaffiliated? | 20718 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of March 23, 2011, there were a total of 20,722 registered voters in Plainfield, of which 12,078 (58.3% vs. 41.8% countywide) were registered as Democratic Party (United States), 947 (4.6% vs. 15.3%) were registered as Republican Party (United States) and 7,693 (37.1% vs. 42.9%) were registered as Unaffiliated (New Jersey). There were 4 voters registered to other parties. Among the citys 2010 Census population, 41.6% (vs. 53.3% in Union County) were registered to vote, including 56.1% of those ages 18 and over (vs. 70.6% countywide).
Question: How many registered voters were Democrat, Republican and unaffiliated?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
20718<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of March 23, 2011, there were a total of 20,722 registered voters in Plainfield, of which 12,078 (58.3% vs. 41.8% countywide) were registered as Democratic Party (United States), 947 (4.6% vs. 15.3%) were registered as Republican Party (United States) and 7,693 (37.1% vs. 42.9%) were registered as Unaffiliated (New Jersey). There were 4 voters registered to other parties. Among the citys 2010 Census population, 41.6% (vs. 53.3% in Union County) were registered to vote, including 56.1% of those ages 18 and over (vs. 70.6% countywide).
Question: How many registered voters were Republican and unaffiliated? | 8640 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of March 23, 2011, there were a total of 20,722 registered voters in Plainfield, of which 12,078 (58.3% vs. 41.8% countywide) were registered as Democratic Party (United States), 947 (4.6% vs. 15.3%) were registered as Republican Party (United States) and 7,693 (37.1% vs. 42.9%) were registered as Unaffiliated (New Jersey). There were 4 voters registered to other parties. Among the citys 2010 Census population, 41.6% (vs. 53.3% in Union County) were registered to vote, including 56.1% of those ages 18 and over (vs. 70.6% countywide).
Question: How many registered voters were Republican and unaffiliated?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
8640<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of March 23, 2011, there were a total of 20,722 registered voters in Plainfield, of which 12,078 (58.3% vs. 41.8% countywide) were registered as Democratic Party (United States), 947 (4.6% vs. 15.3%) were registered as Republican Party (United States) and 7,693 (37.1% vs. 42.9%) were registered as Unaffiliated (New Jersey). There were 4 voters registered to other parties. Among the citys 2010 Census population, 41.6% (vs. 53.3% in Union County) were registered to vote, including 56.1% of those ages 18 and over (vs. 70.6% countywide).
Question: How many registered voters were Democrat and other? | 12082 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of March 23, 2011, there were a total of 20,722 registered voters in Plainfield, of which 12,078 (58.3% vs. 41.8% countywide) were registered as Democratic Party (United States), 947 (4.6% vs. 15.3%) were registered as Republican Party (United States) and 7,693 (37.1% vs. 42.9%) were registered as Unaffiliated (New Jersey). There were 4 voters registered to other parties. Among the citys 2010 Census population, 41.6% (vs. 53.3% in Union County) were registered to vote, including 56.1% of those ages 18 and over (vs. 70.6% countywide).
Question: How many registered voters were Democrat and other?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
12082<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of March 23, 2011, there were a total of 20,722 registered voters in Plainfield, of which 12,078 (58.3% vs. 41.8% countywide) were registered as Democratic Party (United States), 947 (4.6% vs. 15.3%) were registered as Republican Party (United States) and 7,693 (37.1% vs. 42.9%) were registered as Unaffiliated (New Jersey). There were 4 voters registered to other parties. Among the citys 2010 Census population, 41.6% (vs. 53.3% in Union County) were registered to vote, including 56.1% of those ages 18 and over (vs. 70.6% countywide).
Question: How many registered voters were Republican, unaffiliated and other? | 8644 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of March 23, 2011, there were a total of 20,722 registered voters in Plainfield, of which 12,078 (58.3% vs. 41.8% countywide) were registered as Democratic Party (United States), 947 (4.6% vs. 15.3%) were registered as Republican Party (United States) and 7,693 (37.1% vs. 42.9%) were registered as Unaffiliated (New Jersey). There were 4 voters registered to other parties. Among the citys 2010 Census population, 41.6% (vs. 53.3% in Union County) were registered to vote, including 56.1% of those ages 18 and over (vs. 70.6% countywide).
Question: How many registered voters were Republican, unaffiliated and other?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
8644<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Due to the rapidly expanding nature of Californias population, Marins congressional district has changed numerous times over the decades. The county has been part of the Californias 2nd congressional district of California since 2012; the only other time it was part of the 2nd district was 1902–12. It has also been part of the Californias 1st congressional district (1894–1902 and 1912–66), Californias 3rd congressional district (1864–94), Californias 5th congressional district (1974–82), and the Californias 6th congressional district (1972–74 and 1982–2012). The only time the county has not been in a single congressional district was between 1966 and 1972, when it was divided between the northern half in the 1st district and the southern half in the 6th district.
Question: How many times has Marin county been part of the 2nd congressional district? | 2 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Due to the rapidly expanding nature of Californias population, Marins congressional district has changed numerous times over the decades. The county has been part of the Californias 2nd congressional district of California since 2012; the only other time it was part of the 2nd district was 1902–12. It has also been part of the Californias 1st congressional district (1894–1902 and 1912–66), Californias 3rd congressional district (1864–94), Californias 5th congressional district (1974–82), and the Californias 6th congressional district (1972–74 and 1982–2012). The only time the county has not been in a single congressional district was between 1966 and 1972, when it was divided between the northern half in the 1st district and the southern half in the 6th district.
Question: How many times has Marin county been part of the 2nd congressional district?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Due to the rapidly expanding nature of Californias population, Marins congressional district has changed numerous times over the decades. The county has been part of the Californias 2nd congressional district of California since 2012; the only other time it was part of the 2nd district was 1902–12. It has also been part of the Californias 1st congressional district (1894–1902 and 1912–66), Californias 3rd congressional district (1864–94), Californias 5th congressional district (1974–82), and the Californias 6th congressional district (1972–74 and 1982–2012). The only time the county has not been in a single congressional district was between 1966 and 1972, when it was divided between the northern half in the 1st district and the southern half in the 6th district.
Question: How many years did Marin last as part of the 2nd congressional district the first time it was ever part of it? | 10 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Due to the rapidly expanding nature of Californias population, Marins congressional district has changed numerous times over the decades. The county has been part of the Californias 2nd congressional district of California since 2012; the only other time it was part of the 2nd district was 1902–12. It has also been part of the Californias 1st congressional district (1894–1902 and 1912–66), Californias 3rd congressional district (1864–94), Californias 5th congressional district (1974–82), and the Californias 6th congressional district (1972–74 and 1982–2012). The only time the county has not been in a single congressional district was between 1966 and 1972, when it was divided between the northern half in the 1st district and the southern half in the 6th district.
Question: How many years did Marin last as part of the 2nd congressional district the first time it was ever part of it?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
10<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Due to the rapidly expanding nature of Californias population, Marins congressional district has changed numerous times over the decades. The county has been part of the Californias 2nd congressional district of California since 2012; the only other time it was part of the 2nd district was 1902–12. It has also been part of the Californias 1st congressional district (1894–1902 and 1912–66), Californias 3rd congressional district (1864–94), Californias 5th congressional district (1974–82), and the Californias 6th congressional district (1972–74 and 1982–2012). The only time the county has not been in a single congressional district was between 1966 and 1972, when it was divided between the northern half in the 1st district and the southern half in the 6th district.
Question: Which congressional districts has Marin been a part of only one time? | 3rd congressional district 5th congressional district | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Due to the rapidly expanding nature of Californias population, Marins congressional district has changed numerous times over the decades. The county has been part of the Californias 2nd congressional district of California since 2012; the only other time it was part of the 2nd district was 1902–12. It has also been part of the Californias 1st congressional district (1894–1902 and 1912–66), Californias 3rd congressional district (1864–94), Californias 5th congressional district (1974–82), and the Californias 6th congressional district (1972–74 and 1982–2012). The only time the county has not been in a single congressional district was between 1966 and 1972, when it was divided between the northern half in the 1st district and the southern half in the 6th district.
Question: Which congressional districts has Marin been a part of only one time?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
3rd congressional district 5th congressional district<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Due to the rapidly expanding nature of Californias population, Marins congressional district has changed numerous times over the decades. The county has been part of the Californias 2nd congressional district of California since 2012; the only other time it was part of the 2nd district was 1902–12. It has also been part of the Californias 1st congressional district (1894–1902 and 1912–66), Californias 3rd congressional district (1864–94), Californias 5th congressional district (1974–82), and the Californias 6th congressional district (1972–74 and 1982–2012). The only time the county has not been in a single congressional district was between 1966 and 1972, when it was divided between the northern half in the 1st district and the southern half in the 6th district.
Question: Which was Marin a part of for a longer time, 3rd of 5th congressional district? | 3rd congressional district | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Due to the rapidly expanding nature of Californias population, Marins congressional district has changed numerous times over the decades. The county has been part of the Californias 2nd congressional district of California since 2012; the only other time it was part of the 2nd district was 1902–12. It has also been part of the Californias 1st congressional district (1894–1902 and 1912–66), Californias 3rd congressional district (1864–94), Californias 5th congressional district (1974–82), and the Californias 6th congressional district (1972–74 and 1982–2012). The only time the county has not been in a single congressional district was between 1966 and 1972, when it was divided between the northern half in the 1st district and the southern half in the 6th district.
Question: Which was Marin a part of for a longer time, 3rd of 5th congressional district?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
3rd congressional district<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Due to the rapidly expanding nature of Californias population, Marins congressional district has changed numerous times over the decades. The county has been part of the Californias 2nd congressional district of California since 2012; the only other time it was part of the 2nd district was 1902–12. It has also been part of the Californias 1st congressional district (1894–1902 and 1912–66), Californias 3rd congressional district (1864–94), Californias 5th congressional district (1974–82), and the Californias 6th congressional district (1972–74 and 1982–2012). The only time the county has not been in a single congressional district was between 1966 and 1972, when it was divided between the northern half in the 1st district and the southern half in the 6th district.
Question: Which districts was Marin a part of for ten or more years? | 2nd district 3rd congressional district 1st congressional district 6th congressional district | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Due to the rapidly expanding nature of Californias population, Marins congressional district has changed numerous times over the decades. The county has been part of the Californias 2nd congressional district of California since 2012; the only other time it was part of the 2nd district was 1902–12. It has also been part of the Californias 1st congressional district (1894–1902 and 1912–66), Californias 3rd congressional district (1864–94), Californias 5th congressional district (1974–82), and the Californias 6th congressional district (1972–74 and 1982–2012). The only time the county has not been in a single congressional district was between 1966 and 1972, when it was divided between the northern half in the 1st district and the southern half in the 6th district.
Question: Which districts was Marin a part of for ten or more years?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2nd district 3rd congressional district 1st congressional district 6th congressional district<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Due to the rapidly expanding nature of Californias population, Marins congressional district has changed numerous times over the decades. The county has been part of the Californias 2nd congressional district of California since 2012; the only other time it was part of the 2nd district was 1902–12. It has also been part of the Californias 1st congressional district (1894–1902 and 1912–66), Californias 3rd congressional district (1864–94), Californias 5th congressional district (1974–82), and the Californias 6th congressional district (1972–74 and 1982–2012). The only time the county has not been in a single congressional district was between 1966 and 1972, when it was divided between the northern half in the 1st district and the southern half in the 6th district.
Question: How many more years was Marin a part of the 1st congressional district the second time it became part of it than the first time? | 46 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Due to the rapidly expanding nature of Californias population, Marins congressional district has changed numerous times over the decades. The county has been part of the Californias 2nd congressional district of California since 2012; the only other time it was part of the 2nd district was 1902–12. It has also been part of the Californias 1st congressional district (1894–1902 and 1912–66), Californias 3rd congressional district (1864–94), Californias 5th congressional district (1974–82), and the Californias 6th congressional district (1972–74 and 1982–2012). The only time the county has not been in a single congressional district was between 1966 and 1972, when it was divided between the northern half in the 1st district and the southern half in the 6th district.
Question: How many more years was Marin a part of the 1st congressional district the second time it became part of it than the first time?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
46<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The median child birthing age was 30 and the total fertility rate is 2.1 births per woman in 2010. In Māori populations the median age is 26 and fertility rate 2.8. In 2010 the Age adjustment mortality rate was 3.8 deaths per 1000 (down from 4.8 in 2000) and the infant mortality rate for the total population was 5.1 deaths per 1000 live births. The life expectancy of a New Zealand child born in 2014-16 was 83.4 years for females, and 79.9 years for males, which is List of countries by life expectancy. Life expectancy at birth is forecast to increase from 80 years to 85 years in 2050 and infant mortality is expected to decline. In 2050 the median age is forecast to rise from 36 years to 43 years and the percentage of people 60 years of age and older rising from 18 percent to 29 percent. (The number of people aged 65 and over increased by 22 percent between the 2006 and 2013 censuses.) During early migration in 1858, New Zealand had 131 males for every 100 females, but following changes in migration patterns and the modern longevity advantage of women, females came to outnumber males in 1971. As of 2012 there are 0.99 males per female, with males dominating under 15 years and females dominating in the 65 years and older range.
Question: Which year is the latest that the number of people aged 65 and over increased by 22 percent? | 2006 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The median child birthing age was 30 and the total fertility rate is 2.1 births per woman in 2010. In Māori populations the median age is 26 and fertility rate 2.8. In 2010 the Age adjustment mortality rate was 3.8 deaths per 1000 (down from 4.8 in 2000) and the infant mortality rate for the total population was 5.1 deaths per 1000 live births. The life expectancy of a New Zealand child born in 2014-16 was 83.4 years for females, and 79.9 years for males, which is List of countries by life expectancy. Life expectancy at birth is forecast to increase from 80 years to 85 years in 2050 and infant mortality is expected to decline. In 2050 the median age is forecast to rise from 36 years to 43 years and the percentage of people 60 years of age and older rising from 18 percent to 29 percent. (The number of people aged 65 and over increased by 22 percent between the 2006 and 2013 censuses.) During early migration in 1858, New Zealand had 131 males for every 100 females, but following changes in migration patterns and the modern longevity advantage of women, females came to outnumber males in 1971. As of 2012 there are 0.99 males per female, with males dominating under 15 years and females dominating in the 65 years and older range.
Question: Which year is the latest that the number of people aged 65 and over increased by 22 percent?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2006<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The median child birthing age was 30 and the total fertility rate is 2.1 births per woman in 2010. In Māori populations the median age is 26 and fertility rate 2.8. In 2010 the Age adjustment mortality rate was 3.8 deaths per 1000 (down from 4.8 in 2000) and the infant mortality rate for the total population was 5.1 deaths per 1000 live births. The life expectancy of a New Zealand child born in 2014-16 was 83.4 years for females, and 79.9 years for males, which is List of countries by life expectancy. Life expectancy at birth is forecast to increase from 80 years to 85 years in 2050 and infant mortality is expected to decline. In 2050 the median age is forecast to rise from 36 years to 43 years and the percentage of people 60 years of age and older rising from 18 percent to 29 percent. (The number of people aged 65 and over increased by 22 percent between the 2006 and 2013 censuses.) During early migration in 1858, New Zealand had 131 males for every 100 females, but following changes in migration patterns and the modern longevity advantage of women, females came to outnumber males in 1971. As of 2012 there are 0.99 males per female, with males dominating under 15 years and females dominating in the 65 years and older range.
Question: How many more males than females in New Zealand during the early migration in 1858? | 31 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The median child birthing age was 30 and the total fertility rate is 2.1 births per woman in 2010. In Māori populations the median age is 26 and fertility rate 2.8. In 2010 the Age adjustment mortality rate was 3.8 deaths per 1000 (down from 4.8 in 2000) and the infant mortality rate for the total population was 5.1 deaths per 1000 live births. The life expectancy of a New Zealand child born in 2014-16 was 83.4 years for females, and 79.9 years for males, which is List of countries by life expectancy. Life expectancy at birth is forecast to increase from 80 years to 85 years in 2050 and infant mortality is expected to decline. In 2050 the median age is forecast to rise from 36 years to 43 years and the percentage of people 60 years of age and older rising from 18 percent to 29 percent. (The number of people aged 65 and over increased by 22 percent between the 2006 and 2013 censuses.) During early migration in 1858, New Zealand had 131 males for every 100 females, but following changes in migration patterns and the modern longevity advantage of women, females came to outnumber males in 1971. As of 2012 there are 0.99 males per female, with males dominating under 15 years and females dominating in the 65 years and older range.
Question: How many more males than females in New Zealand during the early migration in 1858?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
31<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The median child birthing age was 30 and the total fertility rate is 2.1 births per woman in 2010. In Māori populations the median age is 26 and fertility rate 2.8. In 2010 the Age adjustment mortality rate was 3.8 deaths per 1000 (down from 4.8 in 2000) and the infant mortality rate for the total population was 5.1 deaths per 1000 live births. The life expectancy of a New Zealand child born in 2014-16 was 83.4 years for females, and 79.9 years for males, which is List of countries by life expectancy. Life expectancy at birth is forecast to increase from 80 years to 85 years in 2050 and infant mortality is expected to decline. In 2050 the median age is forecast to rise from 36 years to 43 years and the percentage of people 60 years of age and older rising from 18 percent to 29 percent. (The number of people aged 65 and over increased by 22 percent between the 2006 and 2013 censuses.) During early migration in 1858, New Zealand had 131 males for every 100 females, but following changes in migration patterns and the modern longevity advantage of women, females came to outnumber males in 1971. As of 2012 there are 0.99 males per female, with males dominating under 15 years and females dominating in the 65 years and older range.
Question: How many years passed since the early migration of 1858 to 1971 when females came to outnumber the males in New Zealand? | 113 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The median child birthing age was 30 and the total fertility rate is 2.1 births per woman in 2010. In Māori populations the median age is 26 and fertility rate 2.8. In 2010 the Age adjustment mortality rate was 3.8 deaths per 1000 (down from 4.8 in 2000) and the infant mortality rate for the total population was 5.1 deaths per 1000 live births. The life expectancy of a New Zealand child born in 2014-16 was 83.4 years for females, and 79.9 years for males, which is List of countries by life expectancy. Life expectancy at birth is forecast to increase from 80 years to 85 years in 2050 and infant mortality is expected to decline. In 2050 the median age is forecast to rise from 36 years to 43 years and the percentage of people 60 years of age and older rising from 18 percent to 29 percent. (The number of people aged 65 and over increased by 22 percent between the 2006 and 2013 censuses.) During early migration in 1858, New Zealand had 131 males for every 100 females, but following changes in migration patterns and the modern longevity advantage of women, females came to outnumber males in 1971. As of 2012 there are 0.99 males per female, with males dominating under 15 years and females dominating in the 65 years and older range.
Question: How many years passed since the early migration of 1858 to 1971 when females came to outnumber the males in New Zealand?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
113<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The median child birthing age was 30 and the total fertility rate is 2.1 births per woman in 2010. In Māori populations the median age is 26 and fertility rate 2.8. In 2010 the Age adjustment mortality rate was 3.8 deaths per 1000 (down from 4.8 in 2000) and the infant mortality rate for the total population was 5.1 deaths per 1000 live births. The life expectancy of a New Zealand child born in 2014-16 was 83.4 years for females, and 79.9 years for males, which is List of countries by life expectancy. Life expectancy at birth is forecast to increase from 80 years to 85 years in 2050 and infant mortality is expected to decline. In 2050 the median age is forecast to rise from 36 years to 43 years and the percentage of people 60 years of age and older rising from 18 percent to 29 percent. (The number of people aged 65 and over increased by 22 percent between the 2006 and 2013 censuses.) During early migration in 1858, New Zealand had 131 males for every 100 females, but following changes in migration patterns and the modern longevity advantage of women, females came to outnumber males in 1971. As of 2012 there are 0.99 males per female, with males dominating under 15 years and females dominating in the 65 years and older range.
Question: How many more percentage will the people rise 60 years and higher | 11 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The median child birthing age was 30 and the total fertility rate is 2.1 births per woman in 2010. In Māori populations the median age is 26 and fertility rate 2.8. In 2010 the Age adjustment mortality rate was 3.8 deaths per 1000 (down from 4.8 in 2000) and the infant mortality rate for the total population was 5.1 deaths per 1000 live births. The life expectancy of a New Zealand child born in 2014-16 was 83.4 years for females, and 79.9 years for males, which is List of countries by life expectancy. Life expectancy at birth is forecast to increase from 80 years to 85 years in 2050 and infant mortality is expected to decline. In 2050 the median age is forecast to rise from 36 years to 43 years and the percentage of people 60 years of age and older rising from 18 percent to 29 percent. (The number of people aged 65 and over increased by 22 percent between the 2006 and 2013 censuses.) During early migration in 1858, New Zealand had 131 males for every 100 females, but following changes in migration patterns and the modern longevity advantage of women, females came to outnumber males in 1971. As of 2012 there are 0.99 males per female, with males dominating under 15 years and females dominating in the 65 years and older range.
Question: How many more percentage will the people rise 60 years and higher<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
11<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The median child birthing age was 30 and the total fertility rate is 2.1 births per woman in 2010. In Māori populations the median age is 26 and fertility rate 2.8. In 2010 the Age adjustment mortality rate was 3.8 deaths per 1000 (down from 4.8 in 2000) and the infant mortality rate for the total population was 5.1 deaths per 1000 live births. The life expectancy of a New Zealand child born in 2014-16 was 83.4 years for females, and 79.9 years for males, which is List of countries by life expectancy. Life expectancy at birth is forecast to increase from 80 years to 85 years in 2050 and infant mortality is expected to decline. In 2050 the median age is forecast to rise from 36 years to 43 years and the percentage of people 60 years of age and older rising from 18 percent to 29 percent. (The number of people aged 65 and over increased by 22 percent between the 2006 and 2013 censuses.) During early migration in 1858, New Zealand had 131 males for every 100 females, but following changes in migration patterns and the modern longevity advantage of women, females came to outnumber males in 1971. As of 2012 there are 0.99 males per female, with males dominating under 15 years and females dominating in the 65 years and older range.
Question: Which gender child born in New Zealand will live the longest, male or female? | female | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The median child birthing age was 30 and the total fertility rate is 2.1 births per woman in 2010. In Māori populations the median age is 26 and fertility rate 2.8. In 2010 the Age adjustment mortality rate was 3.8 deaths per 1000 (down from 4.8 in 2000) and the infant mortality rate for the total population was 5.1 deaths per 1000 live births. The life expectancy of a New Zealand child born in 2014-16 was 83.4 years for females, and 79.9 years for males, which is List of countries by life expectancy. Life expectancy at birth is forecast to increase from 80 years to 85 years in 2050 and infant mortality is expected to decline. In 2050 the median age is forecast to rise from 36 years to 43 years and the percentage of people 60 years of age and older rising from 18 percent to 29 percent. (The number of people aged 65 and over increased by 22 percent between the 2006 and 2013 censuses.) During early migration in 1858, New Zealand had 131 males for every 100 females, but following changes in migration patterns and the modern longevity advantage of women, females came to outnumber males in 1971. As of 2012 there are 0.99 males per female, with males dominating under 15 years and females dominating in the 65 years and older range.
Question: Which gender child born in New Zealand will live the longest, male or female?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
female<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The median child birthing age was 30 and the total fertility rate is 2.1 births per woman in 2010. In Māori populations the median age is 26 and fertility rate 2.8. In 2010 the Age adjustment mortality rate was 3.8 deaths per 1000 (down from 4.8 in 2000) and the infant mortality rate for the total population was 5.1 deaths per 1000 live births. The life expectancy of a New Zealand child born in 2014-16 was 83.4 years for females, and 79.9 years for males, which is List of countries by life expectancy. Life expectancy at birth is forecast to increase from 80 years to 85 years in 2050 and infant mortality is expected to decline. In 2050 the median age is forecast to rise from 36 years to 43 years and the percentage of people 60 years of age and older rising from 18 percent to 29 percent. (The number of people aged 65 and over increased by 22 percent between the 2006 and 2013 censuses.) During early migration in 1858, New Zealand had 131 males for every 100 females, but following changes in migration patterns and the modern longevity advantage of women, females came to outnumber males in 1971. As of 2012 there are 0.99 males per female, with males dominating under 15 years and females dominating in the 65 years and older range.
Question: Which age group did the females dominate, 65 and older or under 15? | 65 and older | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The median child birthing age was 30 and the total fertility rate is 2.1 births per woman in 2010. In Māori populations the median age is 26 and fertility rate 2.8. In 2010 the Age adjustment mortality rate was 3.8 deaths per 1000 (down from 4.8 in 2000) and the infant mortality rate for the total population was 5.1 deaths per 1000 live births. The life expectancy of a New Zealand child born in 2014-16 was 83.4 years for females, and 79.9 years for males, which is List of countries by life expectancy. Life expectancy at birth is forecast to increase from 80 years to 85 years in 2050 and infant mortality is expected to decline. In 2050 the median age is forecast to rise from 36 years to 43 years and the percentage of people 60 years of age and older rising from 18 percent to 29 percent. (The number of people aged 65 and over increased by 22 percent between the 2006 and 2013 censuses.) During early migration in 1858, New Zealand had 131 males for every 100 females, but following changes in migration patterns and the modern longevity advantage of women, females came to outnumber males in 1971. As of 2012 there are 0.99 males per female, with males dominating under 15 years and females dominating in the 65 years and older range.
Question: Which age group did the females dominate, 65 and older or under 15?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
65 and older<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Over the years the city has been home to people of various ethnicities, resulting in a range of different traditions and cultural practices. In one decade, the population increased from 427,045 in 1991 to 671,805 in 2001. The population was projected to reach 915,071 in 2011 and 1,319,597 by 2021. To keep up this population growth, the KMC-controlled area of has expanded to in 2001. With this new area, the population density which was 85 in 1991 is still 85 in 2001; it is likely to jump to 111 in 2011 and 161 in 2021.
Question: How many people did the population increase by between 1991 and 2001? | 244760 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Over the years the city has been home to people of various ethnicities, resulting in a range of different traditions and cultural practices. In one decade, the population increased from 427,045 in 1991 to 671,805 in 2001. The population was projected to reach 915,071 in 2011 and 1,319,597 by 2021. To keep up this population growth, the KMC-controlled area of has expanded to in 2001. With this new area, the population density which was 85 in 1991 is still 85 in 2001; it is likely to jump to 111 in 2011 and 161 in 2021.
Question: How many people did the population increase by between 1991 and 2001?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
244760<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Over the years the city has been home to people of various ethnicities, resulting in a range of different traditions and cultural practices. In one decade, the population increased from 427,045 in 1991 to 671,805 in 2001. The population was projected to reach 915,071 in 2011 and 1,319,597 by 2021. To keep up this population growth, the KMC-controlled area of has expanded to in 2001. With this new area, the population density which was 85 in 1991 is still 85 in 2001; it is likely to jump to 111 in 2011 and 161 in 2021.
Question: How many years would it take from 1991 for the population to increase to 1319597, according to projections? | 30 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Over the years the city has been home to people of various ethnicities, resulting in a range of different traditions and cultural practices. In one decade, the population increased from 427,045 in 1991 to 671,805 in 2001. The population was projected to reach 915,071 in 2011 and 1,319,597 by 2021. To keep up this population growth, the KMC-controlled area of has expanded to in 2001. With this new area, the population density which was 85 in 1991 is still 85 in 2001; it is likely to jump to 111 in 2011 and 161 in 2021.
Question: How many years would it take from 1991 for the population to increase to 1319597, according to projections?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
30<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Over the years the city has been home to people of various ethnicities, resulting in a range of different traditions and cultural practices. In one decade, the population increased from 427,045 in 1991 to 671,805 in 2001. The population was projected to reach 915,071 in 2011 and 1,319,597 by 2021. To keep up this population growth, the KMC-controlled area of has expanded to in 2001. With this new area, the population density which was 85 in 1991 is still 85 in 2001; it is likely to jump to 111 in 2011 and 161 in 2021.
Question: Which year is projected to show the greatest increase in population from 10 years prior? | 2021 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Over the years the city has been home to people of various ethnicities, resulting in a range of different traditions and cultural practices. In one decade, the population increased from 427,045 in 1991 to 671,805 in 2001. The population was projected to reach 915,071 in 2011 and 1,319,597 by 2021. To keep up this population growth, the KMC-controlled area of has expanded to in 2001. With this new area, the population density which was 85 in 1991 is still 85 in 2001; it is likely to jump to 111 in 2011 and 161 in 2021.
Question: Which year is projected to show the greatest increase in population from 10 years prior?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2021<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Over the years the city has been home to people of various ethnicities, resulting in a range of different traditions and cultural practices. In one decade, the population increased from 427,045 in 1991 to 671,805 in 2001. The population was projected to reach 915,071 in 2011 and 1,319,597 by 2021. To keep up this population growth, the KMC-controlled area of has expanded to in 2001. With this new area, the population density which was 85 in 1991 is still 85 in 2001; it is likely to jump to 111 in 2011 and 161 in 2021.
Question: How many more people populated the city in 2001 than in 1991? | 244760 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Over the years the city has been home to people of various ethnicities, resulting in a range of different traditions and cultural practices. In one decade, the population increased from 427,045 in 1991 to 671,805 in 2001. The population was projected to reach 915,071 in 2011 and 1,319,597 by 2021. To keep up this population growth, the KMC-controlled area of has expanded to in 2001. With this new area, the population density which was 85 in 1991 is still 85 in 2001; it is likely to jump to 111 in 2011 and 161 in 2021.
Question: How many more people populated the city in 2001 than in 1991?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
244760<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Over the years the city has been home to people of various ethnicities, resulting in a range of different traditions and cultural practices. In one decade, the population increased from 427,045 in 1991 to 671,805 in 2001. The population was projected to reach 915,071 in 2011 and 1,319,597 by 2021. To keep up this population growth, the KMC-controlled area of has expanded to in 2001. With this new area, the population density which was 85 in 1991 is still 85 in 2001; it is likely to jump to 111 in 2011 and 161 in 2021.
Question: Which two years had the same population density? | 85 in 1991 85 in 2001 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Over the years the city has been home to people of various ethnicities, resulting in a range of different traditions and cultural practices. In one decade, the population increased from 427,045 in 1991 to 671,805 in 2001. The population was projected to reach 915,071 in 2011 and 1,319,597 by 2021. To keep up this population growth, the KMC-controlled area of has expanded to in 2001. With this new area, the population density which was 85 in 1991 is still 85 in 2001; it is likely to jump to 111 in 2011 and 161 in 2021.
Question: Which two years had the same population density?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
85 in 1991 85 in 2001<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Successful mining took time and capital, particularly once most of the timber around the Klondike had been cut down. A realistic mining operation required $1,500 ($1.2 million) for wood to be burned to melt the ground, along with around $1,000 ($800,000) to construct a dam, $1,500 ($1.2 million) for ditches and up to $600 ($480,000) for sluice boxes, a total of $4,600. The attraction of the Klondike to a prospector, however, was that when gold was found, it was often highly concentrated. Some of the creeks in the Klondike were fifteen times richer in gold than those in California Gold Rush, and richer still than those in Witwatersrand Gold Rush. In just two years, for example, $230,000 ($184 million) worth of gold was brought up from claim 29 on the Eldorado Creek.
Question: How many dollars in total would it take to fund a realistic mining operation in today's dollars? | 3680000 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Successful mining took time and capital, particularly once most of the timber around the Klondike had been cut down. A realistic mining operation required $1,500 ($1.2 million) for wood to be burned to melt the ground, along with around $1,000 ($800,000) to construct a dam, $1,500 ($1.2 million) for ditches and up to $600 ($480,000) for sluice boxes, a total of $4,600. The attraction of the Klondike to a prospector, however, was that when gold was found, it was often highly concentrated. Some of the creeks in the Klondike were fifteen times richer in gold than those in California Gold Rush, and richer still than those in Witwatersrand Gold Rush. In just two years, for example, $230,000 ($184 million) worth of gold was brought up from claim 29 on the Eldorado Creek.
Question: How many dollars in total would it take to fund a realistic mining operation in today's dollars?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
3680000<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Successful mining took time and capital, particularly once most of the timber around the Klondike had been cut down. A realistic mining operation required $1,500 ($1.2 million) for wood to be burned to melt the ground, along with around $1,000 ($800,000) to construct a dam, $1,500 ($1.2 million) for ditches and up to $600 ($480,000) for sluice boxes, a total of $4,600. The attraction of the Klondike to a prospector, however, was that when gold was found, it was often highly concentrated. Some of the creeks in the Klondike were fifteen times richer in gold than those in California Gold Rush, and richer still than those in Witwatersrand Gold Rush. In just two years, for example, $230,000 ($184 million) worth of gold was brought up from claim 29 on the Eldorado Creek.
Question: What did a mining operation require? | melt the ground construct a dam ditches sluice boxes | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Successful mining took time and capital, particularly once most of the timber around the Klondike had been cut down. A realistic mining operation required $1,500 ($1.2 million) for wood to be burned to melt the ground, along with around $1,000 ($800,000) to construct a dam, $1,500 ($1.2 million) for ditches and up to $600 ($480,000) for sluice boxes, a total of $4,600. The attraction of the Klondike to a prospector, however, was that when gold was found, it was often highly concentrated. Some of the creeks in the Klondike were fifteen times richer in gold than those in California Gold Rush, and richer still than those in Witwatersrand Gold Rush. In just two years, for example, $230,000 ($184 million) worth of gold was brought up from claim 29 on the Eldorado Creek.
Question: What did a mining operation require?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
melt the ground construct a dam ditches sluice boxes<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Successful mining took time and capital, particularly once most of the timber around the Klondike had been cut down. A realistic mining operation required $1,500 ($1.2 million) for wood to be burned to melt the ground, along with around $1,000 ($800,000) to construct a dam, $1,500 ($1.2 million) for ditches and up to $600 ($480,000) for sluice boxes, a total of $4,600. The attraction of the Klondike to a prospector, however, was that when gold was found, it was often highly concentrated. Some of the creeks in the Klondike were fifteen times richer in gold than those in California Gold Rush, and richer still than those in Witwatersrand Gold Rush. In just two years, for example, $230,000 ($184 million) worth of gold was brought up from claim 29 on the Eldorado Creek.
Question: Which gold rushes were some of the Klondike creeks richer than? | California Gold Rush Witwatersrand Gold Rush | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Successful mining took time and capital, particularly once most of the timber around the Klondike had been cut down. A realistic mining operation required $1,500 ($1.2 million) for wood to be burned to melt the ground, along with around $1,000 ($800,000) to construct a dam, $1,500 ($1.2 million) for ditches and up to $600 ($480,000) for sluice boxes, a total of $4,600. The attraction of the Klondike to a prospector, however, was that when gold was found, it was often highly concentrated. Some of the creeks in the Klondike were fifteen times richer in gold than those in California Gold Rush, and richer still than those in Witwatersrand Gold Rush. In just two years, for example, $230,000 ($184 million) worth of gold was brought up from claim 29 on the Eldorado Creek.
Question: Which gold rushes were some of the Klondike creeks richer than?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
California Gold Rush Witwatersrand Gold Rush<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Central payments for the 2016-17 season amounted to £2,398,515,773 across the 20 clubs, with each team receiving a flat participation fee of £35,301,989 and additional payments for TV broadcasts (£1,016,690 for general UK rights to match highlights, £1,136,083 for each live UK broadcast of their games and £39,090,596 for all overseas rights), commercial rights (a flat fee of £4,759,404) and a notional measure of "merit" which was based upon final league position. The merit component was a nominal sum of £1,941,609 multiplied by each finishing place, counted from the foot of the table (e.g., Burnley F.C. finished 16th in May 2017, five places counting upwards, and received 5 × £1,941,609 £9,708,045 merit payment).
Question: What were the additional payments for TV broadcasts for? | live UK broadcast UK rights to match highlights overseas rights | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Central payments for the 2016-17 season amounted to £2,398,515,773 across the 20 clubs, with each team receiving a flat participation fee of £35,301,989 and additional payments for TV broadcasts (£1,016,690 for general UK rights to match highlights, £1,136,083 for each live UK broadcast of their games and £39,090,596 for all overseas rights), commercial rights (a flat fee of £4,759,404) and a notional measure of "merit" which was based upon final league position. The merit component was a nominal sum of £1,941,609 multiplied by each finishing place, counted from the foot of the table (e.g., Burnley F.C. finished 16th in May 2017, five places counting upwards, and received 5 × £1,941,609 £9,708,045 merit payment).
Question: What were the additional payments for TV broadcasts for?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
live UK broadcast UK rights to match highlights overseas rights<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Central payments for the 2016-17 season amounted to £2,398,515,773 across the 20 clubs, with each team receiving a flat participation fee of £35,301,989 and additional payments for TV broadcasts (£1,016,690 for general UK rights to match highlights, £1,136,083 for each live UK broadcast of their games and £39,090,596 for all overseas rights), commercial rights (a flat fee of £4,759,404) and a notional measure of "merit" which was based upon final league position. The merit component was a nominal sum of £1,941,609 multiplied by each finishing place, counted from the foot of the table (e.g., Burnley F.C. finished 16th in May 2017, five places counting upwards, and received 5 × £1,941,609 £9,708,045 merit payment).
Question: How many £ was the team 4 places upwards paid? | 7766436 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Central payments for the 2016-17 season amounted to £2,398,515,773 across the 20 clubs, with each team receiving a flat participation fee of £35,301,989 and additional payments for TV broadcasts (£1,016,690 for general UK rights to match highlights, £1,136,083 for each live UK broadcast of their games and £39,090,596 for all overseas rights), commercial rights (a flat fee of £4,759,404) and a notional measure of "merit" which was based upon final league position. The merit component was a nominal sum of £1,941,609 multiplied by each finishing place, counted from the foot of the table (e.g., Burnley F.C. finished 16th in May 2017, five places counting upwards, and received 5 × £1,941,609 £9,708,045 merit payment).
Question: How many £ was the team 4 places upwards paid?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
7766436<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: This period was known as the "Golden Age (metaphor)" by the FCZ faithful. At this time, the club was run by the legendary President Edwin Nägeli and had players such as Köbi Kuhn, Fritz Künzli, Ilija Katić, René Botteron, and many more. Zürich won seven Swiss Super League in the years 1962-63 Nationalliga A, 1965-66 Nationalliga A, 1967-68 Nationalliga A, 1973-74 Nationalliga A, 1974-75 Nationalliga A, 1975-76 Nationalliga A and 1980-81 Nationalliga A. They also won the Swiss Cup five times in 1966, 1970, 1972, 1973, and in 1976. FCZ also had some success in Europe getting to the semi-finals of the European Cup 1963-64, before losing to Real Madrid C.F. and also reaching the semi-finals in the European Cup 1976-77, where they lost to Liverpool F.C..
Question: Which years in the 1970's did Zürich win the Swiss cup? | 1970 1972 1973 1976 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: This period was known as the "Golden Age (metaphor)" by the FCZ faithful. At this time, the club was run by the legendary President Edwin Nägeli and had players such as Köbi Kuhn, Fritz Künzli, Ilija Katić, René Botteron, and many more. Zürich won seven Swiss Super League in the years 1962-63 Nationalliga A, 1965-66 Nationalliga A, 1967-68 Nationalliga A, 1973-74 Nationalliga A, 1974-75 Nationalliga A, 1975-76 Nationalliga A and 1980-81 Nationalliga A. They also won the Swiss Cup five times in 1966, 1970, 1972, 1973, and in 1976. FCZ also had some success in Europe getting to the semi-finals of the European Cup 1963-64, before losing to Real Madrid C.F. and also reaching the semi-finals in the European Cup 1976-77, where they lost to Liverpool F.C..
Question: Which years in the 1970's did Zürich win the Swiss cup?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
1970 1972 1973 1976<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: This period was known as the "Golden Age (metaphor)" by the FCZ faithful. At this time, the club was run by the legendary President Edwin Nägeli and had players such as Köbi Kuhn, Fritz Künzli, Ilija Katić, René Botteron, and many more. Zürich won seven Swiss Super League in the years 1962-63 Nationalliga A, 1965-66 Nationalliga A, 1967-68 Nationalliga A, 1973-74 Nationalliga A, 1974-75 Nationalliga A, 1975-76 Nationalliga A and 1980-81 Nationalliga A. They also won the Swiss Cup five times in 1966, 1970, 1972, 1973, and in 1976. FCZ also had some success in Europe getting to the semi-finals of the European Cup 1963-64, before losing to Real Madrid C.F. and also reaching the semi-finals in the European Cup 1976-77, where they lost to Liverpool F.C..
Question: How many years was the time span between the first time Zürich won the Swiss Cup and the last time they won the Swiss Cup? | 10 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: This period was known as the "Golden Age (metaphor)" by the FCZ faithful. At this time, the club was run by the legendary President Edwin Nägeli and had players such as Köbi Kuhn, Fritz Künzli, Ilija Katić, René Botteron, and many more. Zürich won seven Swiss Super League in the years 1962-63 Nationalliga A, 1965-66 Nationalliga A, 1967-68 Nationalliga A, 1973-74 Nationalliga A, 1974-75 Nationalliga A, 1975-76 Nationalliga A and 1980-81 Nationalliga A. They also won the Swiss Cup five times in 1966, 1970, 1972, 1973, and in 1976. FCZ also had some success in Europe getting to the semi-finals of the European Cup 1963-64, before losing to Real Madrid C.F. and also reaching the semi-finals in the European Cup 1976-77, where they lost to Liverpool F.C..
Question: How many years was the time span between the first time Zürich won the Swiss Cup and the last time they won the Swiss Cup?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
10<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: This period was known as the "Golden Age (metaphor)" by the FCZ faithful. At this time, the club was run by the legendary President Edwin Nägeli and had players such as Köbi Kuhn, Fritz Künzli, Ilija Katić, René Botteron, and many more. Zürich won seven Swiss Super League in the years 1962-63 Nationalliga A, 1965-66 Nationalliga A, 1967-68 Nationalliga A, 1973-74 Nationalliga A, 1974-75 Nationalliga A, 1975-76 Nationalliga A and 1980-81 Nationalliga A. They also won the Swiss Cup five times in 1966, 1970, 1972, 1973, and in 1976. FCZ also had some success in Europe getting to the semi-finals of the European Cup 1963-64, before losing to Real Madrid C.F. and also reaching the semi-finals in the European Cup 1976-77, where they lost to Liverpool F.C..
Question: How many times did Zürich win the Swiss Cup in the 1970's? | 4 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: This period was known as the "Golden Age (metaphor)" by the FCZ faithful. At this time, the club was run by the legendary President Edwin Nägeli and had players such as Köbi Kuhn, Fritz Künzli, Ilija Katić, René Botteron, and many more. Zürich won seven Swiss Super League in the years 1962-63 Nationalliga A, 1965-66 Nationalliga A, 1967-68 Nationalliga A, 1973-74 Nationalliga A, 1974-75 Nationalliga A, 1975-76 Nationalliga A and 1980-81 Nationalliga A. They also won the Swiss Cup five times in 1966, 1970, 1972, 1973, and in 1976. FCZ also had some success in Europe getting to the semi-finals of the European Cup 1963-64, before losing to Real Madrid C.F. and also reaching the semi-finals in the European Cup 1976-77, where they lost to Liverpool F.C..
Question: How many times did Zürich win the Swiss Cup in the 1970's?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
4<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: This period was known as the "Golden Age (metaphor)" by the FCZ faithful. At this time, the club was run by the legendary President Edwin Nägeli and had players such as Köbi Kuhn, Fritz Künzli, Ilija Katić, René Botteron, and many more. Zürich won seven Swiss Super League in the years 1962-63 Nationalliga A, 1965-66 Nationalliga A, 1967-68 Nationalliga A, 1973-74 Nationalliga A, 1974-75 Nationalliga A, 1975-76 Nationalliga A and 1980-81 Nationalliga A. They also won the Swiss Cup five times in 1966, 1970, 1972, 1973, and in 1976. FCZ also had some success in Europe getting to the semi-finals of the European Cup 1963-64, before losing to Real Madrid C.F. and also reaching the semi-finals in the European Cup 1976-77, where they lost to Liverpool F.C..
Question: Which team won the semi-finals of the European Cup 1963-64, Zürich or Real Madrid C.F.? | Real Madrid C.F. | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: This period was known as the "Golden Age (metaphor)" by the FCZ faithful. At this time, the club was run by the legendary President Edwin Nägeli and had players such as Köbi Kuhn, Fritz Künzli, Ilija Katić, René Botteron, and many more. Zürich won seven Swiss Super League in the years 1962-63 Nationalliga A, 1965-66 Nationalliga A, 1967-68 Nationalliga A, 1973-74 Nationalliga A, 1974-75 Nationalliga A, 1975-76 Nationalliga A and 1980-81 Nationalliga A. They also won the Swiss Cup five times in 1966, 1970, 1972, 1973, and in 1976. FCZ also had some success in Europe getting to the semi-finals of the European Cup 1963-64, before losing to Real Madrid C.F. and also reaching the semi-finals in the European Cup 1976-77, where they lost to Liverpool F.C..
Question: Which team won the semi-finals of the European Cup 1963-64, Zürich or Real Madrid C.F.?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Real Madrid C.F.<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: This period was known as the "Golden Age (metaphor)" by the FCZ faithful. At this time, the club was run by the legendary President Edwin Nägeli and had players such as Köbi Kuhn, Fritz Künzli, Ilija Katić, René Botteron, and many more. Zürich won seven Swiss Super League in the years 1962-63 Nationalliga A, 1965-66 Nationalliga A, 1967-68 Nationalliga A, 1973-74 Nationalliga A, 1974-75 Nationalliga A, 1975-76 Nationalliga A and 1980-81 Nationalliga A. They also won the Swiss Cup five times in 1966, 1970, 1972, 1973, and in 1976. FCZ also had some success in Europe getting to the semi-finals of the European Cup 1963-64, before losing to Real Madrid C.F. and also reaching the semi-finals in the European Cup 1976-77, where they lost to Liverpool F.C..
Question: Which team lost the semi-finals European Cup 1976-77, Liverpool F.C. or Zürich? | Zürich | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: This period was known as the "Golden Age (metaphor)" by the FCZ faithful. At this time, the club was run by the legendary President Edwin Nägeli and had players such as Köbi Kuhn, Fritz Künzli, Ilija Katić, René Botteron, and many more. Zürich won seven Swiss Super League in the years 1962-63 Nationalliga A, 1965-66 Nationalliga A, 1967-68 Nationalliga A, 1973-74 Nationalliga A, 1974-75 Nationalliga A, 1975-76 Nationalliga A and 1980-81 Nationalliga A. They also won the Swiss Cup five times in 1966, 1970, 1972, 1973, and in 1976. FCZ also had some success in Europe getting to the semi-finals of the European Cup 1963-64, before losing to Real Madrid C.F. and also reaching the semi-finals in the European Cup 1976-77, where they lost to Liverpool F.C..
Question: Which team lost the semi-finals European Cup 1976-77, Liverpool F.C. or Zürich?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Zürich<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: This period was known as the "Golden Age (metaphor)" by the FCZ faithful. At this time, the club was run by the legendary President Edwin Nägeli and had players such as Köbi Kuhn, Fritz Künzli, Ilija Katić, René Botteron, and many more. Zürich won seven Swiss Super League in the years 1962-63 Nationalliga A, 1965-66 Nationalliga A, 1967-68 Nationalliga A, 1973-74 Nationalliga A, 1974-75 Nationalliga A, 1975-76 Nationalliga A and 1980-81 Nationalliga A. They also won the Swiss Cup five times in 1966, 1970, 1972, 1973, and in 1976. FCZ also had some success in Europe getting to the semi-finals of the European Cup 1963-64, before losing to Real Madrid C.F. and also reaching the semi-finals in the European Cup 1976-77, where they lost to Liverpool F.C..
Question: How many times did Zürich win the Swiss Super League in the 1960's? | 3 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: This period was known as the "Golden Age (metaphor)" by the FCZ faithful. At this time, the club was run by the legendary President Edwin Nägeli and had players such as Köbi Kuhn, Fritz Künzli, Ilija Katić, René Botteron, and many more. Zürich won seven Swiss Super League in the years 1962-63 Nationalliga A, 1965-66 Nationalliga A, 1967-68 Nationalliga A, 1973-74 Nationalliga A, 1974-75 Nationalliga A, 1975-76 Nationalliga A and 1980-81 Nationalliga A. They also won the Swiss Cup five times in 1966, 1970, 1972, 1973, and in 1976. FCZ also had some success in Europe getting to the semi-finals of the European Cup 1963-64, before losing to Real Madrid C.F. and also reaching the semi-finals in the European Cup 1976-77, where they lost to Liverpool F.C..
Question: How many times did Zürich win the Swiss Super League in the 1960's?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
3<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: This period was known as the "Golden Age (metaphor)" by the FCZ faithful. At this time, the club was run by the legendary President Edwin Nägeli and had players such as Köbi Kuhn, Fritz Künzli, Ilija Katić, René Botteron, and many more. Zürich won seven Swiss Super League in the years 1962-63 Nationalliga A, 1965-66 Nationalliga A, 1967-68 Nationalliga A, 1973-74 Nationalliga A, 1974-75 Nationalliga A, 1975-76 Nationalliga A and 1980-81 Nationalliga A. They also won the Swiss Cup five times in 1966, 1970, 1972, 1973, and in 1976. FCZ also had some success in Europe getting to the semi-finals of the European Cup 1963-64, before losing to Real Madrid C.F. and also reaching the semi-finals in the European Cup 1976-77, where they lost to Liverpool F.C..
Question: What was the first year Zürich won the Swiff Cup? | 1966 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: This period was known as the "Golden Age (metaphor)" by the FCZ faithful. At this time, the club was run by the legendary President Edwin Nägeli and had players such as Köbi Kuhn, Fritz Künzli, Ilija Katić, René Botteron, and many more. Zürich won seven Swiss Super League in the years 1962-63 Nationalliga A, 1965-66 Nationalliga A, 1967-68 Nationalliga A, 1973-74 Nationalliga A, 1974-75 Nationalliga A, 1975-76 Nationalliga A and 1980-81 Nationalliga A. They also won the Swiss Cup five times in 1966, 1970, 1972, 1973, and in 1976. FCZ also had some success in Europe getting to the semi-finals of the European Cup 1963-64, before losing to Real Madrid C.F. and also reaching the semi-finals in the European Cup 1976-77, where they lost to Liverpool F.C..
Question: What was the first year Zürich won the Swiff Cup?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
1966<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many years after agreeing to keep the island neutral did Britain take control over it? | 14 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many years after agreeing to keep the island neutral did Britain take control over it?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
14<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many years after Britain took control of the island did France capture it? | 18 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many years after Britain took control of the island did France capture it?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
18<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many years after first capturing the island did Britain recapture it? | 30 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many years after first capturing the island did Britain recapture it?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
30<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: Were there more slaves or white individuals on the island in 1771? | slaves | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: Were there more slaves or white individuals on the island in 1771?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
slaves<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: In which two years did Britain take control over the island? | 1763 1793 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: In which two years did Britain take control over the island?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
1763 1793<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: What type of factory was most abundant on the island? | cotton | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: What type of factory was most abundant on the island?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
cotton<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: What were the two most abundant types of factories on the island? | cotton sugar | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: What were the two most abundant types of factories on the island?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
cotton sugar<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many more slaves were there compared to white people on the island in 1791? | 13629 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many more slaves were there compared to white people on the island in 1791?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
13629<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many people on the island in 1791 were neither white nor a slave? | 309 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many people on the island in 1791 were neither white nor a slave?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
309<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many years after France captured the island did Britain than recapture the island? | 12 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many years after France captured the island did Britain than recapture the island?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
12<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: Which group was bigger, white or slaves? | slaves | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: Which group was bigger, white or slaves?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
slaves<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many people did the white group increase by in 1791 from 1771? | 298 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many people did the white group increase by in 1791 from 1771?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
298<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: Which industries each had more than 30 factories? | sugar cotton | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: Which industries each had more than 30 factories?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
sugar cotton<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many more sugar factories were there than coffee factories? | 33 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many more sugar factories were there than coffee factories?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
33<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many of the population in 1771 were not white or slaves? | 125 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many of the population in 1771 were not white or slaves?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
125<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many of the population in 1791 were not white or slaves? | 309 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many of the population in 1791 were not white or slaves?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
309<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many people were not whites or slaves in 1771 and 1791 combined? | 434 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many people were not whites or slaves in 1771 and 1791 combined?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
434<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many total people in 1771 and 1791 were not white? | 19320 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many total people in 1771 and 1791 were not white?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
19320<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many total people were whites and slaves in 1771 and 1791? | 20210 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many total people were whites and slaves in 1771 and 1791?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
20210<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many more slaves were there in 1791 than whites in 1791 and whites and slaves in 1771 combined? | 9210 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many more slaves were there in 1791 than whites in 1791 and whites and slaves in 1771 combined?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
9210<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many more cotton factories were there than sugar and coffee factories combined? | 58 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many more cotton factories were there than sugar and coffee factories combined?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
58<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many total coffee, sugar and cotton factories were there? | 140 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many total coffee, sugar and cotton factories were there?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
140<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many more sugar and coffee factories were there than nutmeg plantations? | 1 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many more sugar and coffee factories were there than nutmeg plantations?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
1<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many years after nutmeg was discovered did the island become a British acquisition for good? | 34 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many years after nutmeg was discovered did the island become a British acquisition for good?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
34<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many years after the island became a British acquisition was the treaty ratified? | 12 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1749, Britain and France agreed to keep the island neutral, but Britain took control after 1763, prompting France to capture the island in 1781, then Britain to recapture the island in 1793. The population in 1771 was 5,084, of which only 243 were white and 4,716 were slaves. In 1791 the population was 15,020, of which 541 were white and 14,170 were slaves. There were then 37 sugar factories, 99 cotton factories, and 4 coffee factories. After nutmeg was discovered in 1768, 40 nutmeg plantations were started. The island became a British acquisition for good in 1802, with a ratified treaty in 1814.
Question: How many years after the island became a British acquisition was the treaty ratified?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
12<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Mechelen capitulated to Henri Christian Michel de Stengel and 6,000 Frenchmen on 16 November 1792 and its garrison of one battalion of the Austrian Württemberg Infantry Regiment Nr. 38 was allowed to go free. On the 27th Stengel with 8,000 soldiers from the Army of Belgium won a minor action at Voroux-lez-Liers near Liège over Anton Sztáray and four battalions of Austrians. Antwerp fell on 29 November to Mirandas 17,600 infantry and 1,245 cavalry. The Austrian garrison of the 1st Battalion of the Hohenlohe Nr. 17, two companies of the Vierset Nr. 59 and four companies of the Würzburg Infantry Regiments, plus 140 gunners surrendered after losing two dead and four wounded. The French captured 57 cannons, 50 additional 3-pound regimental cannons, 3,150 muskets and 1,523 hundredweight of gunpowder. The 2,599-man garrison of Namur under Johann Dominik von Moitelle surrendered on 2 December to Valence and Harville after a four-week siege. The Austrian defenders included two battalions of the Kinsky Infantry Regiment Nr. 36, one battalion of the Vierset, two companies of the Le Loup Jäger (military) Battalion, a half-squadron of the Esterhazy Hussar Regiment Nr. 32 and 90 gunners. Harvilles division counted 13,256 infantry, 1,425 cavalry and 266 artillerists.
Question: Which items did the French capture the greatest amount, muskets or gunpowder? | muskets | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Mechelen capitulated to Henri Christian Michel de Stengel and 6,000 Frenchmen on 16 November 1792 and its garrison of one battalion of the Austrian Württemberg Infantry Regiment Nr. 38 was allowed to go free. On the 27th Stengel with 8,000 soldiers from the Army of Belgium won a minor action at Voroux-lez-Liers near Liège over Anton Sztáray and four battalions of Austrians. Antwerp fell on 29 November to Mirandas 17,600 infantry and 1,245 cavalry. The Austrian garrison of the 1st Battalion of the Hohenlohe Nr. 17, two companies of the Vierset Nr. 59 and four companies of the Würzburg Infantry Regiments, plus 140 gunners surrendered after losing two dead and four wounded. The French captured 57 cannons, 50 additional 3-pound regimental cannons, 3,150 muskets and 1,523 hundredweight of gunpowder. The 2,599-man garrison of Namur under Johann Dominik von Moitelle surrendered on 2 December to Valence and Harville after a four-week siege. The Austrian defenders included two battalions of the Kinsky Infantry Regiment Nr. 36, one battalion of the Vierset, two companies of the Le Loup Jäger (military) Battalion, a half-squadron of the Esterhazy Hussar Regiment Nr. 32 and 90 gunners. Harvilles division counted 13,256 infantry, 1,425 cavalry and 266 artillerists.
Question: Which items did the French capture the greatest amount, muskets or gunpowder?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
muskets<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Mechelen capitulated to Henri Christian Michel de Stengel and 6,000 Frenchmen on 16 November 1792 and its garrison of one battalion of the Austrian Württemberg Infantry Regiment Nr. 38 was allowed to go free. On the 27th Stengel with 8,000 soldiers from the Army of Belgium won a minor action at Voroux-lez-Liers near Liège over Anton Sztáray and four battalions of Austrians. Antwerp fell on 29 November to Mirandas 17,600 infantry and 1,245 cavalry. The Austrian garrison of the 1st Battalion of the Hohenlohe Nr. 17, two companies of the Vierset Nr. 59 and four companies of the Würzburg Infantry Regiments, plus 140 gunners surrendered after losing two dead and four wounded. The French captured 57 cannons, 50 additional 3-pound regimental cannons, 3,150 muskets and 1,523 hundredweight of gunpowder. The 2,599-man garrison of Namur under Johann Dominik von Moitelle surrendered on 2 December to Valence and Harville after a four-week siege. The Austrian defenders included two battalions of the Kinsky Infantry Regiment Nr. 36, one battalion of the Vierset, two companies of the Le Loup Jäger (military) Battalion, a half-squadron of the Esterhazy Hussar Regiment Nr. 32 and 90 gunners. Harvilles division counted 13,256 infantry, 1,425 cavalry and 266 artillerists.
Question: How many more Mirandas than cavalry on November 9? | 16355 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Mechelen capitulated to Henri Christian Michel de Stengel and 6,000 Frenchmen on 16 November 1792 and its garrison of one battalion of the Austrian Württemberg Infantry Regiment Nr. 38 was allowed to go free. On the 27th Stengel with 8,000 soldiers from the Army of Belgium won a minor action at Voroux-lez-Liers near Liège over Anton Sztáray and four battalions of Austrians. Antwerp fell on 29 November to Mirandas 17,600 infantry and 1,245 cavalry. The Austrian garrison of the 1st Battalion of the Hohenlohe Nr. 17, two companies of the Vierset Nr. 59 and four companies of the Würzburg Infantry Regiments, plus 140 gunners surrendered after losing two dead and four wounded. The French captured 57 cannons, 50 additional 3-pound regimental cannons, 3,150 muskets and 1,523 hundredweight of gunpowder. The 2,599-man garrison of Namur under Johann Dominik von Moitelle surrendered on 2 December to Valence and Harville after a four-week siege. The Austrian defenders included two battalions of the Kinsky Infantry Regiment Nr. 36, one battalion of the Vierset, two companies of the Le Loup Jäger (military) Battalion, a half-squadron of the Esterhazy Hussar Regiment Nr. 32 and 90 gunners. Harvilles division counted 13,256 infantry, 1,425 cavalry and 266 artillerists.
Question: How many more Mirandas than cavalry on November 9?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
16355<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Mechelen capitulated to Henri Christian Michel de Stengel and 6,000 Frenchmen on 16 November 1792 and its garrison of one battalion of the Austrian Württemberg Infantry Regiment Nr. 38 was allowed to go free. On the 27th Stengel with 8,000 soldiers from the Army of Belgium won a minor action at Voroux-lez-Liers near Liège over Anton Sztáray and four battalions of Austrians. Antwerp fell on 29 November to Mirandas 17,600 infantry and 1,245 cavalry. The Austrian garrison of the 1st Battalion of the Hohenlohe Nr. 17, two companies of the Vierset Nr. 59 and four companies of the Würzburg Infantry Regiments, plus 140 gunners surrendered after losing two dead and four wounded. The French captured 57 cannons, 50 additional 3-pound regimental cannons, 3,150 muskets and 1,523 hundredweight of gunpowder. The 2,599-man garrison of Namur under Johann Dominik von Moitelle surrendered on 2 December to Valence and Harville after a four-week siege. The Austrian defenders included two battalions of the Kinsky Infantry Regiment Nr. 36, one battalion of the Vierset, two companies of the Le Loup Jäger (military) Battalion, a half-squadron of the Esterhazy Hussar Regiment Nr. 32 and 90 gunners. Harvilles division counted 13,256 infantry, 1,425 cavalry and 266 artillerists.
Question: How many cannons and muskets did the French capture total? | 3207 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Mechelen capitulated to Henri Christian Michel de Stengel and 6,000 Frenchmen on 16 November 1792 and its garrison of one battalion of the Austrian Württemberg Infantry Regiment Nr. 38 was allowed to go free. On the 27th Stengel with 8,000 soldiers from the Army of Belgium won a minor action at Voroux-lez-Liers near Liège over Anton Sztáray and four battalions of Austrians. Antwerp fell on 29 November to Mirandas 17,600 infantry and 1,245 cavalry. The Austrian garrison of the 1st Battalion of the Hohenlohe Nr. 17, two companies of the Vierset Nr. 59 and four companies of the Würzburg Infantry Regiments, plus 140 gunners surrendered after losing two dead and four wounded. The French captured 57 cannons, 50 additional 3-pound regimental cannons, 3,150 muskets and 1,523 hundredweight of gunpowder. The 2,599-man garrison of Namur under Johann Dominik von Moitelle surrendered on 2 December to Valence and Harville after a four-week siege. The Austrian defenders included two battalions of the Kinsky Infantry Regiment Nr. 36, one battalion of the Vierset, two companies of the Le Loup Jäger (military) Battalion, a half-squadron of the Esterhazy Hussar Regiment Nr. 32 and 90 gunners. Harvilles division counted 13,256 infantry, 1,425 cavalry and 266 artillerists.
Question: How many cannons and muskets did the French capture total?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
3207<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: For domestic use, powered by 13,500 lb (60.5 kN) Pratt & Whitney JT3C-6 turbojets with water injection. The initial DC-8-11 model had the original, high-drag wingtips and all were converted to DC-8-12 standard. The DC-8-12 had the new wingtips and leading edge slot, 80 inches long between the engines on each wing and 34 inches long inboard of the inner engines. These unique devices were covered by doors on the upper and lower wing surfaces that opened for low speed flight and closed for cruise. The maximum weight increased from . 28 DC-8-10s were built. This model was originally named "DC-8A" until the series 30 was introduced. 29 built, 22 for United and 6 for Delta, plus the prototype. By the mid sixties United had converted 15 of its 20 surviving aircraft to DC-8-20 standard and the other 5 to -50s. Delta converted its 6 to DC-8-50s.
Question: How many more DC-8-10 were built for United than Delta? | 23 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: For domestic use, powered by 13,500 lb (60.5 kN) Pratt & Whitney JT3C-6 turbojets with water injection. The initial DC-8-11 model had the original, high-drag wingtips and all were converted to DC-8-12 standard. The DC-8-12 had the new wingtips and leading edge slot, 80 inches long between the engines on each wing and 34 inches long inboard of the inner engines. These unique devices were covered by doors on the upper and lower wing surfaces that opened for low speed flight and closed for cruise. The maximum weight increased from . 28 DC-8-10s were built. This model was originally named "DC-8A" until the series 30 was introduced. 29 built, 22 for United and 6 for Delta, plus the prototype. By the mid sixties United had converted 15 of its 20 surviving aircraft to DC-8-20 standard and the other 5 to -50s. Delta converted its 6 to DC-8-50s.
Question: How many more DC-8-10 were built for United than Delta?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
23<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: By 1991 President Callejas had achieved modest success in controlling inflation. Overall inflation for 1990 had reached 36.4 percent—not the hyperinflation experienced by some Latin American counties—but still the highest annual rate for Honduras in forty years. The Honduran government and the IMF had set an inflation target of 12 percent for 1992 and 8 percent for 1993. The actual figures were 8.8 percent in 1992 and an estimated 10.7 percent for 1993. Hondurans had been accustomed to low inflation (3.4 percent in 1985, rising to 4.5 percent by the end of 1986), partly because pegging the lempira to the dollar linked Hondurass inflation rate to inflation rates in developed countries. But the expectation for low inflation made the reality of high inflation that much worse and created additional pressures on the government for action when inflation soared in 1990.
Question: Which year had the largest inflation in Latin American counties: 1992 or 1993? | 1992 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: By 1991 President Callejas had achieved modest success in controlling inflation. Overall inflation for 1990 had reached 36.4 percent—not the hyperinflation experienced by some Latin American counties—but still the highest annual rate for Honduras in forty years. The Honduran government and the IMF had set an inflation target of 12 percent for 1992 and 8 percent for 1993. The actual figures were 8.8 percent in 1992 and an estimated 10.7 percent for 1993. Hondurans had been accustomed to low inflation (3.4 percent in 1985, rising to 4.5 percent by the end of 1986), partly because pegging the lempira to the dollar linked Hondurass inflation rate to inflation rates in developed countries. But the expectation for low inflation made the reality of high inflation that much worse and created additional pressures on the government for action when inflation soared in 1990.
Question: Which year had the largest inflation in Latin American counties: 1992 or 1993?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
1992<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: By 1991 President Callejas had achieved modest success in controlling inflation. Overall inflation for 1990 had reached 36.4 percent—not the hyperinflation experienced by some Latin American counties—but still the highest annual rate for Honduras in forty years. The Honduran government and the IMF had set an inflation target of 12 percent for 1992 and 8 percent for 1993. The actual figures were 8.8 percent in 1992 and an estimated 10.7 percent for 1993. Hondurans had been accustomed to low inflation (3.4 percent in 1985, rising to 4.5 percent by the end of 1986), partly because pegging the lempira to the dollar linked Hondurass inflation rate to inflation rates in developed countries. But the expectation for low inflation made the reality of high inflation that much worse and created additional pressures on the government for action when inflation soared in 1990.
Question: How many more percentage was low inflation in 1986 than 1986? | 1.1 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: By 1991 President Callejas had achieved modest success in controlling inflation. Overall inflation for 1990 had reached 36.4 percent—not the hyperinflation experienced by some Latin American counties—but still the highest annual rate for Honduras in forty years. The Honduran government and the IMF had set an inflation target of 12 percent for 1992 and 8 percent for 1993. The actual figures were 8.8 percent in 1992 and an estimated 10.7 percent for 1993. Hondurans had been accustomed to low inflation (3.4 percent in 1985, rising to 4.5 percent by the end of 1986), partly because pegging the lempira to the dollar linked Hondurass inflation rate to inflation rates in developed countries. But the expectation for low inflation made the reality of high inflation that much worse and created additional pressures on the government for action when inflation soared in 1990.
Question: How many more percentage was low inflation in 1986 than 1986?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
1.1<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: By 1991 President Callejas had achieved modest success in controlling inflation. Overall inflation for 1990 had reached 36.4 percent—not the hyperinflation experienced by some Latin American counties—but still the highest annual rate for Honduras in forty years. The Honduran government and the IMF had set an inflation target of 12 percent for 1992 and 8 percent for 1993. The actual figures were 8.8 percent in 1992 and an estimated 10.7 percent for 1993. Hondurans had been accustomed to low inflation (3.4 percent in 1985, rising to 4.5 percent by the end of 1986), partly because pegging the lempira to the dollar linked Hondurass inflation rate to inflation rates in developed countries. But the expectation for low inflation made the reality of high inflation that much worse and created additional pressures on the government for action when inflation soared in 1990.
Question: How many more inflation percentage did the Hondurans have in 1992 than 1993? | 4 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: By 1991 President Callejas had achieved modest success in controlling inflation. Overall inflation for 1990 had reached 36.4 percent—not the hyperinflation experienced by some Latin American counties—but still the highest annual rate for Honduras in forty years. The Honduran government and the IMF had set an inflation target of 12 percent for 1992 and 8 percent for 1993. The actual figures were 8.8 percent in 1992 and an estimated 10.7 percent for 1993. Hondurans had been accustomed to low inflation (3.4 percent in 1985, rising to 4.5 percent by the end of 1986), partly because pegging the lempira to the dollar linked Hondurass inflation rate to inflation rates in developed countries. But the expectation for low inflation made the reality of high inflation that much worse and created additional pressures on the government for action when inflation soared in 1990.
Question: How many more inflation percentage did the Hondurans have in 1992 than 1993?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
4<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: By 1991 President Callejas had achieved modest success in controlling inflation. Overall inflation for 1990 had reached 36.4 percent—not the hyperinflation experienced by some Latin American counties—but still the highest annual rate for Honduras in forty years. The Honduran government and the IMF had set an inflation target of 12 percent for 1992 and 8 percent for 1993. The actual figures were 8.8 percent in 1992 and an estimated 10.7 percent for 1993. Hondurans had been accustomed to low inflation (3.4 percent in 1985, rising to 4.5 percent by the end of 1986), partly because pegging the lempira to the dollar linked Hondurass inflation rate to inflation rates in developed countries. But the expectation for low inflation made the reality of high inflation that much worse and created additional pressures on the government for action when inflation soared in 1990.
Question: How many percentage were the Honduras to their target in 1992? | 3.2 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: By 1991 President Callejas had achieved modest success in controlling inflation. Overall inflation for 1990 had reached 36.4 percent—not the hyperinflation experienced by some Latin American counties—but still the highest annual rate for Honduras in forty years. The Honduran government and the IMF had set an inflation target of 12 percent for 1992 and 8 percent for 1993. The actual figures were 8.8 percent in 1992 and an estimated 10.7 percent for 1993. Hondurans had been accustomed to low inflation (3.4 percent in 1985, rising to 4.5 percent by the end of 1986), partly because pegging the lempira to the dollar linked Hondurass inflation rate to inflation rates in developed countries. But the expectation for low inflation made the reality of high inflation that much worse and created additional pressures on the government for action when inflation soared in 1990.
Question: How many percentage were the Honduras to their target in 1992?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
3.2<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: By 1991 President Callejas had achieved modest success in controlling inflation. Overall inflation for 1990 had reached 36.4 percent—not the hyperinflation experienced by some Latin American counties—but still the highest annual rate for Honduras in forty years. The Honduran government and the IMF had set an inflation target of 12 percent for 1992 and 8 percent for 1993. The actual figures were 8.8 percent in 1992 and an estimated 10.7 percent for 1993. Hondurans had been accustomed to low inflation (3.4 percent in 1985, rising to 4.5 percent by the end of 1986), partly because pegging the lempira to the dollar linked Hondurass inflation rate to inflation rates in developed countries. But the expectation for low inflation made the reality of high inflation that much worse and created additional pressures on the government for action when inflation soared in 1990.
Question: How many percentage was the Honduras over their target in 1993? | 2.7 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: By 1991 President Callejas had achieved modest success in controlling inflation. Overall inflation for 1990 had reached 36.4 percent—not the hyperinflation experienced by some Latin American counties—but still the highest annual rate for Honduras in forty years. The Honduran government and the IMF had set an inflation target of 12 percent for 1992 and 8 percent for 1993. The actual figures were 8.8 percent in 1992 and an estimated 10.7 percent for 1993. Hondurans had been accustomed to low inflation (3.4 percent in 1985, rising to 4.5 percent by the end of 1986), partly because pegging the lempira to the dollar linked Hondurass inflation rate to inflation rates in developed countries. But the expectation for low inflation made the reality of high inflation that much worse and created additional pressures on the government for action when inflation soared in 1990.
Question: How many percentage was the Honduras over their target in 1993?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2.7<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: 97.7% of the population were in households, 2.3% were in group quarters, and 1% were institutionalized. There were 8,103,731 households of which 30.2% or 2,449,343 had children. 46.1% or 3,736,165 were composed of opposite sex and married couples. Male households with no wife composed 4.9% or 400,534. 15.0% or 1,212,436 were female households, with no husbands. 34% or 2,754,596 were non-family households. The household density was 684 per square mile. 91.9% of housing units were occupied with a 3.8% vacancy rate. The average household size was 2.65 per household. The average income for non-family households was $90,335, and the average income for families was $104,715. 13.3% or 2,888,493 of the population were below the poverty line.
Question: How many percentage were in group quarters than were institutionalized? | 1.3 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: 97.7% of the population were in households, 2.3% were in group quarters, and 1% were institutionalized. There were 8,103,731 households of which 30.2% or 2,449,343 had children. 46.1% or 3,736,165 were composed of opposite sex and married couples. Male households with no wife composed 4.9% or 400,534. 15.0% or 1,212,436 were female households, with no husbands. 34% or 2,754,596 were non-family households. The household density was 684 per square mile. 91.9% of housing units were occupied with a 3.8% vacancy rate. The average household size was 2.65 per household. The average income for non-family households was $90,335, and the average income for families was $104,715. 13.3% or 2,888,493 of the population were below the poverty line.
Question: How many percentage were in group quarters than were institutionalized?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
1.3<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: 97.7% of the population were in households, 2.3% were in group quarters, and 1% were institutionalized. There were 8,103,731 households of which 30.2% or 2,449,343 had children. 46.1% or 3,736,165 were composed of opposite sex and married couples. Male households with no wife composed 4.9% or 400,534. 15.0% or 1,212,436 were female households, with no husbands. 34% or 2,754,596 were non-family households. The household density was 684 per square mile. 91.9% of housing units were occupied with a 3.8% vacancy rate. The average household size was 2.65 per household. The average income for non-family households was $90,335, and the average income for families was $104,715. 13.3% or 2,888,493 of the population were below the poverty line.
Question: How many more of the population was in households than institutionalized? | 96.7 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: 97.7% of the population were in households, 2.3% were in group quarters, and 1% were institutionalized. There were 8,103,731 households of which 30.2% or 2,449,343 had children. 46.1% or 3,736,165 were composed of opposite sex and married couples. Male households with no wife composed 4.9% or 400,534. 15.0% or 1,212,436 were female households, with no husbands. 34% or 2,754,596 were non-family households. The household density was 684 per square mile. 91.9% of housing units were occupied with a 3.8% vacancy rate. The average household size was 2.65 per household. The average income for non-family households was $90,335, and the average income for families was $104,715. 13.3% or 2,888,493 of the population were below the poverty line.
Question: How many more of the population was in households than institutionalized?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
96.7<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: 97.7% of the population were in households, 2.3% were in group quarters, and 1% were institutionalized. There were 8,103,731 households of which 30.2% or 2,449,343 had children. 46.1% or 3,736,165 were composed of opposite sex and married couples. Male households with no wife composed 4.9% or 400,534. 15.0% or 1,212,436 were female households, with no husbands. 34% or 2,754,596 were non-family households. The household density was 684 per square mile. 91.9% of housing units were occupied with a 3.8% vacancy rate. The average household size was 2.65 per household. The average income for non-family households was $90,335, and the average income for families was $104,715. 13.3% or 2,888,493 of the population were below the poverty line.
Question: How many more dollars are the average income for families than for non-family? | 14380 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: 97.7% of the population were in households, 2.3% were in group quarters, and 1% were institutionalized. There were 8,103,731 households of which 30.2% or 2,449,343 had children. 46.1% or 3,736,165 were composed of opposite sex and married couples. Male households with no wife composed 4.9% or 400,534. 15.0% or 1,212,436 were female households, with no husbands. 34% or 2,754,596 were non-family households. The household density was 684 per square mile. 91.9% of housing units were occupied with a 3.8% vacancy rate. The average household size was 2.65 per household. The average income for non-family households was $90,335, and the average income for families was $104,715. 13.3% or 2,888,493 of the population were below the poverty line.
Question: How many more dollars are the average income for families than for non-family?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
14380<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: 97.7% of the population were in households, 2.3% were in group quarters, and 1% were institutionalized. There were 8,103,731 households of which 30.2% or 2,449,343 had children. 46.1% or 3,736,165 were composed of opposite sex and married couples. Male households with no wife composed 4.9% or 400,534. 15.0% or 1,212,436 were female households, with no husbands. 34% or 2,754,596 were non-family households. The household density was 684 per square mile. 91.9% of housing units were occupied with a 3.8% vacancy rate. The average household size was 2.65 per household. The average income for non-family households was $90,335, and the average income for families was $104,715. 13.3% or 2,888,493 of the population were below the poverty line.
Question: How many more percentage had female households with no husband than males house with no wife? | 10.1 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: 97.7% of the population were in households, 2.3% were in group quarters, and 1% were institutionalized. There were 8,103,731 households of which 30.2% or 2,449,343 had children. 46.1% or 3,736,165 were composed of opposite sex and married couples. Male households with no wife composed 4.9% or 400,534. 15.0% or 1,212,436 were female households, with no husbands. 34% or 2,754,596 were non-family households. The household density was 684 per square mile. 91.9% of housing units were occupied with a 3.8% vacancy rate. The average household size was 2.65 per household. The average income for non-family households was $90,335, and the average income for families was $104,715. 13.3% or 2,888,493 of the population were below the poverty line.
Question: How many more percentage had female households with no husband than males house with no wife?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
10.1<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: 97.7% of the population were in households, 2.3% were in group quarters, and 1% were institutionalized. There were 8,103,731 households of which 30.2% or 2,449,343 had children. 46.1% or 3,736,165 were composed of opposite sex and married couples. Male households with no wife composed 4.9% or 400,534. 15.0% or 1,212,436 were female households, with no husbands. 34% or 2,754,596 were non-family households. The household density was 684 per square mile. 91.9% of housing units were occupied with a 3.8% vacancy rate. The average household size was 2.65 per household. The average income for non-family households was $90,335, and the average income for families was $104,715. 13.3% or 2,888,493 of the population were below the poverty line.
Question: Which household had a higher percentage, with children or opposite sex and married couples? | opposite sex | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: 97.7% of the population were in households, 2.3% were in group quarters, and 1% were institutionalized. There were 8,103,731 households of which 30.2% or 2,449,343 had children. 46.1% or 3,736,165 were composed of opposite sex and married couples. Male households with no wife composed 4.9% or 400,534. 15.0% or 1,212,436 were female households, with no husbands. 34% or 2,754,596 were non-family households. The household density was 684 per square mile. 91.9% of housing units were occupied with a 3.8% vacancy rate. The average household size was 2.65 per household. The average income for non-family households was $90,335, and the average income for families was $104,715. 13.3% or 2,888,493 of the population were below the poverty line.
Question: Which household had a higher percentage, with children or opposite sex and married couples?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
opposite sex<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: 97.7% of the population were in households, 2.3% were in group quarters, and 1% were institutionalized. There were 8,103,731 households of which 30.2% or 2,449,343 had children. 46.1% or 3,736,165 were composed of opposite sex and married couples. Male households with no wife composed 4.9% or 400,534. 15.0% or 1,212,436 were female households, with no husbands. 34% or 2,754,596 were non-family households. The household density was 684 per square mile. 91.9% of housing units were occupied with a 3.8% vacancy rate. The average household size was 2.65 per household. The average income for non-family households was $90,335, and the average income for families was $104,715. 13.3% or 2,888,493 of the population were below the poverty line.
Question: How many less households had children than were composed of opposite sex and married couples? | 1286822 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: 97.7% of the population were in households, 2.3% were in group quarters, and 1% were institutionalized. There were 8,103,731 households of which 30.2% or 2,449,343 had children. 46.1% or 3,736,165 were composed of opposite sex and married couples. Male households with no wife composed 4.9% or 400,534. 15.0% or 1,212,436 were female households, with no husbands. 34% or 2,754,596 were non-family households. The household density was 684 per square mile. 91.9% of housing units were occupied with a 3.8% vacancy rate. The average household size was 2.65 per household. The average income for non-family households was $90,335, and the average income for families was $104,715. 13.3% or 2,888,493 of the population were below the poverty line.
Question: How many less households had children than were composed of opposite sex and married couples?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
1286822<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: 97.7% of the population were in households, 2.3% were in group quarters, and 1% were institutionalized. There were 8,103,731 households of which 30.2% or 2,449,343 had children. 46.1% or 3,736,165 were composed of opposite sex and married couples. Male households with no wife composed 4.9% or 400,534. 15.0% or 1,212,436 were female households, with no husbands. 34% or 2,754,596 were non-family households. The household density was 684 per square mile. 91.9% of housing units were occupied with a 3.8% vacancy rate. The average household size was 2.65 per household. The average income for non-family households was $90,335, and the average income for families was $104,715. 13.3% or 2,888,493 of the population were below the poverty line.
Question: In percent, how many of the population were in group quarters or institutionalized? | 3.3 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: 97.7% of the population were in households, 2.3% were in group quarters, and 1% were institutionalized. There were 8,103,731 households of which 30.2% or 2,449,343 had children. 46.1% or 3,736,165 were composed of opposite sex and married couples. Male households with no wife composed 4.9% or 400,534. 15.0% or 1,212,436 were female households, with no husbands. 34% or 2,754,596 were non-family households. The household density was 684 per square mile. 91.9% of housing units were occupied with a 3.8% vacancy rate. The average household size was 2.65 per household. The average income for non-family households was $90,335, and the average income for families was $104,715. 13.3% or 2,888,493 of the population were below the poverty line.
Question: In percent, how many of the population were in group quarters or institutionalized?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
3.3<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: 97.7% of the population were in households, 2.3% were in group quarters, and 1% were institutionalized. There were 8,103,731 households of which 30.2% or 2,449,343 had children. 46.1% or 3,736,165 were composed of opposite sex and married couples. Male households with no wife composed 4.9% or 400,534. 15.0% or 1,212,436 were female households, with no husbands. 34% or 2,754,596 were non-family households. The household density was 684 per square mile. 91.9% of housing units were occupied with a 3.8% vacancy rate. The average household size was 2.65 per household. The average income for non-family households was $90,335, and the average income for families was $104,715. 13.3% or 2,888,493 of the population were below the poverty line.
Question: How many households had no children? | 5654388 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: 97.7% of the population were in households, 2.3% were in group quarters, and 1% were institutionalized. There were 8,103,731 households of which 30.2% or 2,449,343 had children. 46.1% or 3,736,165 were composed of opposite sex and married couples. Male households with no wife composed 4.9% or 400,534. 15.0% or 1,212,436 were female households, with no husbands. 34% or 2,754,596 were non-family households. The household density was 684 per square mile. 91.9% of housing units were occupied with a 3.8% vacancy rate. The average household size was 2.65 per household. The average income for non-family households was $90,335, and the average income for families was $104,715. 13.3% or 2,888,493 of the population were below the poverty line.
Question: How many households had no children?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
5654388<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: 97.7% of the population were in households, 2.3% were in group quarters, and 1% were institutionalized. There were 8,103,731 households of which 30.2% or 2,449,343 had children. 46.1% or 3,736,165 were composed of opposite sex and married couples. Male households with no wife composed 4.9% or 400,534. 15.0% or 1,212,436 were female households, with no husbands. 34% or 2,754,596 were non-family households. The household density was 684 per square mile. 91.9% of housing units were occupied with a 3.8% vacancy rate. The average household size was 2.65 per household. The average income for non-family households was $90,335, and the average income for families was $104,715. 13.3% or 2,888,493 of the population were below the poverty line.
Question: Were there more households with females and no husband present or more male households with no wife? | female | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: 97.7% of the population were in households, 2.3% were in group quarters, and 1% were institutionalized. There were 8,103,731 households of which 30.2% or 2,449,343 had children. 46.1% or 3,736,165 were composed of opposite sex and married couples. Male households with no wife composed 4.9% or 400,534. 15.0% or 1,212,436 were female households, with no husbands. 34% or 2,754,596 were non-family households. The household density was 684 per square mile. 91.9% of housing units were occupied with a 3.8% vacancy rate. The average household size was 2.65 per household. The average income for non-family households was $90,335, and the average income for families was $104,715. 13.3% or 2,888,493 of the population were below the poverty line.
Question: Were there more households with females and no husband present or more male households with no wife?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
female<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: 97.7% of the population were in households, 2.3% were in group quarters, and 1% were institutionalized. There were 8,103,731 households of which 30.2% or 2,449,343 had children. 46.1% or 3,736,165 were composed of opposite sex and married couples. Male households with no wife composed 4.9% or 400,534. 15.0% or 1,212,436 were female households, with no husbands. 34% or 2,754,596 were non-family households. The household density was 684 per square mile. 91.9% of housing units were occupied with a 3.8% vacancy rate. The average household size was 2.65 per household. The average income for non-family households was $90,335, and the average income for families was $104,715. 13.3% or 2,888,493 of the population were below the poverty line.
Question: How many more households were composed of opposite sex and married couples than non-family households? | 5349135 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: 97.7% of the population were in households, 2.3% were in group quarters, and 1% were institutionalized. There were 8,103,731 households of which 30.2% or 2,449,343 had children. 46.1% or 3,736,165 were composed of opposite sex and married couples. Male households with no wife composed 4.9% or 400,534. 15.0% or 1,212,436 were female households, with no husbands. 34% or 2,754,596 were non-family households. The household density was 684 per square mile. 91.9% of housing units were occupied with a 3.8% vacancy rate. The average household size was 2.65 per household. The average income for non-family households was $90,335, and the average income for families was $104,715. 13.3% or 2,888,493 of the population were below the poverty line.
Question: How many more households were composed of opposite sex and married couples than non-family households?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
5349135<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: 97.7% of the population were in households, 2.3% were in group quarters, and 1% were institutionalized. There were 8,103,731 households of which 30.2% or 2,449,343 had children. 46.1% or 3,736,165 were composed of opposite sex and married couples. Male households with no wife composed 4.9% or 400,534. 15.0% or 1,212,436 were female households, with no husbands. 34% or 2,754,596 were non-family households. The household density was 684 per square mile. 91.9% of housing units were occupied with a 3.8% vacancy rate. The average household size was 2.65 per household. The average income for non-family households was $90,335, and the average income for families was $104,715. 13.3% or 2,888,493 of the population were below the poverty line.
Question: How many more dollars was the average income for families than non-family households? | 14380 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: 97.7% of the population were in households, 2.3% were in group quarters, and 1% were institutionalized. There were 8,103,731 households of which 30.2% or 2,449,343 had children. 46.1% or 3,736,165 were composed of opposite sex and married couples. Male households with no wife composed 4.9% or 400,534. 15.0% or 1,212,436 were female households, with no husbands. 34% or 2,754,596 were non-family households. The household density was 684 per square mile. 91.9% of housing units were occupied with a 3.8% vacancy rate. The average household size was 2.65 per household. The average income for non-family households was $90,335, and the average income for families was $104,715. 13.3% or 2,888,493 of the population were below the poverty line.
Question: How many more dollars was the average income for families than non-family households?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
14380<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: 97.7% of the population were in households, 2.3% were in group quarters, and 1% were institutionalized. There were 8,103,731 households of which 30.2% or 2,449,343 had children. 46.1% or 3,736,165 were composed of opposite sex and married couples. Male households with no wife composed 4.9% or 400,534. 15.0% or 1,212,436 were female households, with no husbands. 34% or 2,754,596 were non-family households. The household density was 684 per square mile. 91.9% of housing units were occupied with a 3.8% vacancy rate. The average household size was 2.65 per household. The average income for non-family households was $90,335, and the average income for families was $104,715. 13.3% or 2,888,493 of the population were below the poverty line.
Question: In percent, how many of the population is above the poverty line? | 86.7 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: 97.7% of the population were in households, 2.3% were in group quarters, and 1% were institutionalized. There were 8,103,731 households of which 30.2% or 2,449,343 had children. 46.1% or 3,736,165 were composed of opposite sex and married couples. Male households with no wife composed 4.9% or 400,534. 15.0% or 1,212,436 were female households, with no husbands. 34% or 2,754,596 were non-family households. The household density was 684 per square mile. 91.9% of housing units were occupied with a 3.8% vacancy rate. The average household size was 2.65 per household. The average income for non-family households was $90,335, and the average income for families was $104,715. 13.3% or 2,888,493 of the population were below the poverty line.
Question: In percent, how many of the population is above the poverty line?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
86.7<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: A September 2014 Lucid Talk Belfast Telegraph poll showed that 40.1% of the population supported same-sex marriage, while 39.4% opposed and 20.5% either had or stated no opinion. Of those that gave an opinion, 50.5% supported and 49.5% opposed same-sex marriage. A poll in May 2015 found that 68% of the population supported same-sex marriage, with support rising to 75% in Belfast. A "mass rally", organised by the Irish Congress of Trade Unions, Amnesty International, and the Rainbow Project took place in Belfast on 13 June 2015, with a 20,000 person turnout. A June 2016 poll gave support for same-sex marriage at 70%, while those opposing it at 22%.
Question: How many organizations organized a June 2015 rally in Belfast? | 3 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: A September 2014 Lucid Talk Belfast Telegraph poll showed that 40.1% of the population supported same-sex marriage, while 39.4% opposed and 20.5% either had or stated no opinion. Of those that gave an opinion, 50.5% supported and 49.5% opposed same-sex marriage. A poll in May 2015 found that 68% of the population supported same-sex marriage, with support rising to 75% in Belfast. A "mass rally", organised by the Irish Congress of Trade Unions, Amnesty International, and the Rainbow Project took place in Belfast on 13 June 2015, with a 20,000 person turnout. A June 2016 poll gave support for same-sex marriage at 70%, while those opposing it at 22%.
Question: How many organizations organized a June 2015 rally in Belfast?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
3<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: A September 2014 Lucid Talk Belfast Telegraph poll showed that 40.1% of the population supported same-sex marriage, while 39.4% opposed and 20.5% either had or stated no opinion. Of those that gave an opinion, 50.5% supported and 49.5% opposed same-sex marriage. A poll in May 2015 found that 68% of the population supported same-sex marriage, with support rising to 75% in Belfast. A "mass rally", organised by the Irish Congress of Trade Unions, Amnesty International, and the Rainbow Project took place in Belfast on 13 June 2015, with a 20,000 person turnout. A June 2016 poll gave support for same-sex marriage at 70%, while those opposing it at 22%.
Question: How many more percent supported than opposed same-sex marriage in June 2016? | 48 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: A September 2014 Lucid Talk Belfast Telegraph poll showed that 40.1% of the population supported same-sex marriage, while 39.4% opposed and 20.5% either had or stated no opinion. Of those that gave an opinion, 50.5% supported and 49.5% opposed same-sex marriage. A poll in May 2015 found that 68% of the population supported same-sex marriage, with support rising to 75% in Belfast. A "mass rally", organised by the Irish Congress of Trade Unions, Amnesty International, and the Rainbow Project took place in Belfast on 13 June 2015, with a 20,000 person turnout. A June 2016 poll gave support for same-sex marriage at 70%, while those opposing it at 22%.
Question: How many more percent supported than opposed same-sex marriage in June 2016?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
48<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: A September 2014 Lucid Talk Belfast Telegraph poll showed that 40.1% of the population supported same-sex marriage, while 39.4% opposed and 20.5% either had or stated no opinion. Of those that gave an opinion, 50.5% supported and 49.5% opposed same-sex marriage. A poll in May 2015 found that 68% of the population supported same-sex marriage, with support rising to 75% in Belfast. A "mass rally", organised by the Irish Congress of Trade Unions, Amnesty International, and the Rainbow Project took place in Belfast on 13 June 2015, with a 20,000 person turnout. A June 2016 poll gave support for same-sex marriage at 70%, while those opposing it at 22%.
Question: Was support for same-sex marriage higher in 2014 or 2016? | 2016 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: A September 2014 Lucid Talk Belfast Telegraph poll showed that 40.1% of the population supported same-sex marriage, while 39.4% opposed and 20.5% either had or stated no opinion. Of those that gave an opinion, 50.5% supported and 49.5% opposed same-sex marriage. A poll in May 2015 found that 68% of the population supported same-sex marriage, with support rising to 75% in Belfast. A "mass rally", organised by the Irish Congress of Trade Unions, Amnesty International, and the Rainbow Project took place in Belfast on 13 June 2015, with a 20,000 person turnout. A June 2016 poll gave support for same-sex marriage at 70%, while those opposing it at 22%.
Question: Was support for same-sex marriage higher in 2014 or 2016?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2016<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: A September 2014 Lucid Talk Belfast Telegraph poll showed that 40.1% of the population supported same-sex marriage, while 39.4% opposed and 20.5% either had or stated no opinion. Of those that gave an opinion, 50.5% supported and 49.5% opposed same-sex marriage. A poll in May 2015 found that 68% of the population supported same-sex marriage, with support rising to 75% in Belfast. A "mass rally", organised by the Irish Congress of Trade Unions, Amnesty International, and the Rainbow Project took place in Belfast on 13 June 2015, with a 20,000 person turnout. A June 2016 poll gave support for same-sex marriage at 70%, while those opposing it at 22%.
Question: In percent, how many more people in a September 2014 poll supported same-sex marriage than opposed it? | .7 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: A September 2014 Lucid Talk Belfast Telegraph poll showed that 40.1% of the population supported same-sex marriage, while 39.4% opposed and 20.5% either had or stated no opinion. Of those that gave an opinion, 50.5% supported and 49.5% opposed same-sex marriage. A poll in May 2015 found that 68% of the population supported same-sex marriage, with support rising to 75% in Belfast. A "mass rally", organised by the Irish Congress of Trade Unions, Amnesty International, and the Rainbow Project took place in Belfast on 13 June 2015, with a 20,000 person turnout. A June 2016 poll gave support for same-sex marriage at 70%, while those opposing it at 22%.
Question: In percent, how many more people in a September 2014 poll supported same-sex marriage than opposed it?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
.7<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: A September 2014 Lucid Talk Belfast Telegraph poll showed that 40.1% of the population supported same-sex marriage, while 39.4% opposed and 20.5% either had or stated no opinion. Of those that gave an opinion, 50.5% supported and 49.5% opposed same-sex marriage. A poll in May 2015 found that 68% of the population supported same-sex marriage, with support rising to 75% in Belfast. A "mass rally", organised by the Irish Congress of Trade Unions, Amnesty International, and the Rainbow Project took place in Belfast on 13 June 2015, with a 20,000 person turnout. A June 2016 poll gave support for same-sex marriage at 70%, while those opposing it at 22%.
Question: In percent, how many more people in a September 2014 poll supported same-sex marriage than had or stated no opinion? | 19.6 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: A September 2014 Lucid Talk Belfast Telegraph poll showed that 40.1% of the population supported same-sex marriage, while 39.4% opposed and 20.5% either had or stated no opinion. Of those that gave an opinion, 50.5% supported and 49.5% opposed same-sex marriage. A poll in May 2015 found that 68% of the population supported same-sex marriage, with support rising to 75% in Belfast. A "mass rally", organised by the Irish Congress of Trade Unions, Amnesty International, and the Rainbow Project took place in Belfast on 13 June 2015, with a 20,000 person turnout. A June 2016 poll gave support for same-sex marriage at 70%, while those opposing it at 22%.
Question: In percent, how many more people in a September 2014 poll supported same-sex marriage than had or stated no opinion?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
19.6<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: A September 2014 Lucid Talk Belfast Telegraph poll showed that 40.1% of the population supported same-sex marriage, while 39.4% opposed and 20.5% either had or stated no opinion. Of those that gave an opinion, 50.5% supported and 49.5% opposed same-sex marriage. A poll in May 2015 found that 68% of the population supported same-sex marriage, with support rising to 75% in Belfast. A "mass rally", organised by the Irish Congress of Trade Unions, Amnesty International, and the Rainbow Project took place in Belfast on 13 June 2015, with a 20,000 person turnout. A June 2016 poll gave support for same-sex marriage at 70%, while those opposing it at 22%.
Question: Between the September 2014 and the June 2016 polls, how many more people, in percent, supported same sex marriage? | 29.9 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: A September 2014 Lucid Talk Belfast Telegraph poll showed that 40.1% of the population supported same-sex marriage, while 39.4% opposed and 20.5% either had or stated no opinion. Of those that gave an opinion, 50.5% supported and 49.5% opposed same-sex marriage. A poll in May 2015 found that 68% of the population supported same-sex marriage, with support rising to 75% in Belfast. A "mass rally", organised by the Irish Congress of Trade Unions, Amnesty International, and the Rainbow Project took place in Belfast on 13 June 2015, with a 20,000 person turnout. A June 2016 poll gave support for same-sex marriage at 70%, while those opposing it at 22%.
Question: Between the September 2014 and the June 2016 polls, how many more people, in percent, supported same sex marriage?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
29.9<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: A September 2014 Lucid Talk Belfast Telegraph poll showed that 40.1% of the population supported same-sex marriage, while 39.4% opposed and 20.5% either had or stated no opinion. Of those that gave an opinion, 50.5% supported and 49.5% opposed same-sex marriage. A poll in May 2015 found that 68% of the population supported same-sex marriage, with support rising to 75% in Belfast. A "mass rally", organised by the Irish Congress of Trade Unions, Amnesty International, and the Rainbow Project took place in Belfast on 13 June 2015, with a 20,000 person turnout. A June 2016 poll gave support for same-sex marriage at 70%, while those opposing it at 22%.
Question: As of the June 2016 poll, in percent, how many more people supported same-sex marriage than opposed it? | 48 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: A September 2014 Lucid Talk Belfast Telegraph poll showed that 40.1% of the population supported same-sex marriage, while 39.4% opposed and 20.5% either had or stated no opinion. Of those that gave an opinion, 50.5% supported and 49.5% opposed same-sex marriage. A poll in May 2015 found that 68% of the population supported same-sex marriage, with support rising to 75% in Belfast. A "mass rally", organised by the Irish Congress of Trade Unions, Amnesty International, and the Rainbow Project took place in Belfast on 13 June 2015, with a 20,000 person turnout. A June 2016 poll gave support for same-sex marriage at 70%, while those opposing it at 22%.
Question: As of the June 2016 poll, in percent, how many more people supported same-sex marriage than opposed it?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
48<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Notable victories during his era were 10-0 away to Portugal in 1947, 4-0 away to Italy in 1948, 4-2 at home to Brazil in 1956 and 9-3 at home to Scotland in 1961. Notable defeats were United States v England (1950 FIFA World Cup) in the 1950 World Cup and England 3-6 Hungary (1953 association football friendly) when England lost their unbeaten home record to a foreign team, followed by a Hungary 7-1 England (1954 association football friendly) in 1954.
Question: How many more wins than losses did he have at home in Scotland in 1961? | 6 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Notable victories during his era were 10-0 away to Portugal in 1947, 4-0 away to Italy in 1948, 4-2 at home to Brazil in 1956 and 9-3 at home to Scotland in 1961. Notable defeats were United States v England (1950 FIFA World Cup) in the 1950 World Cup and England 3-6 Hungary (1953 association football friendly) when England lost their unbeaten home record to a foreign team, followed by a Hungary 7-1 England (1954 association football friendly) in 1954.
Question: How many more wins than losses did he have at home in Scotland in 1961?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
6<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Notable victories during his era were 10-0 away to Portugal in 1947, 4-0 away to Italy in 1948, 4-2 at home to Brazil in 1956 and 9-3 at home to Scotland in 1961. Notable defeats were United States v England (1950 FIFA World Cup) in the 1950 World Cup and England 3-6 Hungary (1953 association football friendly) when England lost their unbeaten home record to a foreign team, followed by a Hungary 7-1 England (1954 association football friendly) in 1954.
Question: How many years after a 4-2 victory at home to Brazil was there a 9-3 at home victory to Scotland? | 5 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Notable victories during his era were 10-0 away to Portugal in 1947, 4-0 away to Italy in 1948, 4-2 at home to Brazil in 1956 and 9-3 at home to Scotland in 1961. Notable defeats were United States v England (1950 FIFA World Cup) in the 1950 World Cup and England 3-6 Hungary (1953 association football friendly) when England lost their unbeaten home record to a foreign team, followed by a Hungary 7-1 England (1954 association football friendly) in 1954.
Question: How many years after a 4-2 victory at home to Brazil was there a 9-3 at home victory to Scotland?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
5<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Notable victories during his era were 10-0 away to Portugal in 1947, 4-0 away to Italy in 1948, 4-2 at home to Brazil in 1956 and 9-3 at home to Scotland in 1961. Notable defeats were United States v England (1950 FIFA World Cup) in the 1950 World Cup and England 3-6 Hungary (1953 association football friendly) when England lost their unbeaten home record to a foreign team, followed by a Hungary 7-1 England (1954 association football friendly) in 1954.
Question: Which defeat occurred first, United States v England (FIFA World Cup) or England v Hungary (associated football friendly) | United States v England | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Notable victories during his era were 10-0 away to Portugal in 1947, 4-0 away to Italy in 1948, 4-2 at home to Brazil in 1956 and 9-3 at home to Scotland in 1961. Notable defeats were United States v England (1950 FIFA World Cup) in the 1950 World Cup and England 3-6 Hungary (1953 association football friendly) when England lost their unbeaten home record to a foreign team, followed by a Hungary 7-1 England (1954 association football friendly) in 1954.
Question: Which defeat occurred first, United States v England (FIFA World Cup) or England v Hungary (associated football friendly)<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
United States v England<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Air transportation Colombia was a pioneer in promoting airlines in an effort to overcome its geographic barriers to transportation. The Colombian Company of Air Navigation, formed in 1919, was the second commercial airline in the world. It was not until the 1940s that Colombias air transportation began growing significantly in the number of companies, passengers carried, and kilometers covered. In the early 2000s, an average of 72 percent of the passengers transported by air go to national destinations, while 28 percent travel internationally. One notable feature is that after the reforms of the beginning of the 1990s, the number of international passengers tripled by 2003. In 1993 the construction, administration, operation, and maintenance of the main airports transferred to departmental authorities and the private sector, including companies specializing in air transportation. Within this process, in 2006 the International Airport Operator (Opain), a Swiss-Colombian consortium, won the concession to manage and develop Bogotá’s El Dorado International Airport. El Dorado is the largest airport in Latin America in terms of cargo traffic (33rd worldwide), with 622,145 metric tons in 2013, second in terms of traffic movements (45th worldwide) and third in terms of passengers (50th among the busiest airports in the world). In addition to El Dorado, Colombia’s international airports are Palo Negro in Bucaramanga, Simón Bolívar in Santa Marta, Cortissoz in Barranquilla, Rafael Núñez in Cartagena, José María Córdova in Rionegro near Medellín, Alfonso Bonilla Aragón in Cali, Alfredo Vásquez Cobo in Leticia, Matecaña in Pereira, Gustavo Rojas Pinilla in San Andrés, and Camilo Daza in Cúcuta. In 2006 Colombia was generally reported to have a total of 984 airports, of which 103 had paved runways and 883 were unpaved. The Ministry of Transportation listed 581 airports in 2007, but it may have used a different methodology for counting them.
Question: How many international airports does Colombia have in total? | 11 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Air transportation Colombia was a pioneer in promoting airlines in an effort to overcome its geographic barriers to transportation. The Colombian Company of Air Navigation, formed in 1919, was the second commercial airline in the world. It was not until the 1940s that Colombias air transportation began growing significantly in the number of companies, passengers carried, and kilometers covered. In the early 2000s, an average of 72 percent of the passengers transported by air go to national destinations, while 28 percent travel internationally. One notable feature is that after the reforms of the beginning of the 1990s, the number of international passengers tripled by 2003. In 1993 the construction, administration, operation, and maintenance of the main airports transferred to departmental authorities and the private sector, including companies specializing in air transportation. Within this process, in 2006 the International Airport Operator (Opain), a Swiss-Colombian consortium, won the concession to manage and develop Bogotá’s El Dorado International Airport. El Dorado is the largest airport in Latin America in terms of cargo traffic (33rd worldwide), with 622,145 metric tons in 2013, second in terms of traffic movements (45th worldwide) and third in terms of passengers (50th among the busiest airports in the world). In addition to El Dorado, Colombia’s international airports are Palo Negro in Bucaramanga, Simón Bolívar in Santa Marta, Cortissoz in Barranquilla, Rafael Núñez in Cartagena, José María Córdova in Rionegro near Medellín, Alfonso Bonilla Aragón in Cali, Alfredo Vásquez Cobo in Leticia, Matecaña in Pereira, Gustavo Rojas Pinilla in San Andrés, and Camilo Daza in Cúcuta. In 2006 Colombia was generally reported to have a total of 984 airports, of which 103 had paved runways and 883 were unpaved. The Ministry of Transportation listed 581 airports in 2007, but it may have used a different methodology for counting them.
Question: How many international airports does Colombia have in total?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
11<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Air transportation Colombia was a pioneer in promoting airlines in an effort to overcome its geographic barriers to transportation. The Colombian Company of Air Navigation, formed in 1919, was the second commercial airline in the world. It was not until the 1940s that Colombias air transportation began growing significantly in the number of companies, passengers carried, and kilometers covered. In the early 2000s, an average of 72 percent of the passengers transported by air go to national destinations, while 28 percent travel internationally. One notable feature is that after the reforms of the beginning of the 1990s, the number of international passengers tripled by 2003. In 1993 the construction, administration, operation, and maintenance of the main airports transferred to departmental authorities and the private sector, including companies specializing in air transportation. Within this process, in 2006 the International Airport Operator (Opain), a Swiss-Colombian consortium, won the concession to manage and develop Bogotá’s El Dorado International Airport. El Dorado is the largest airport in Latin America in terms of cargo traffic (33rd worldwide), with 622,145 metric tons in 2013, second in terms of traffic movements (45th worldwide) and third in terms of passengers (50th among the busiest airports in the world). In addition to El Dorado, Colombia’s international airports are Palo Negro in Bucaramanga, Simón Bolívar in Santa Marta, Cortissoz in Barranquilla, Rafael Núñez in Cartagena, José María Córdova in Rionegro near Medellín, Alfonso Bonilla Aragón in Cali, Alfredo Vásquez Cobo in Leticia, Matecaña in Pereira, Gustavo Rojas Pinilla in San Andrés, and Camilo Daza in Cúcuta. In 2006 Colombia was generally reported to have a total of 984 airports, of which 103 had paved runways and 883 were unpaved. The Ministry of Transportation listed 581 airports in 2007, but it may have used a different methodology for counting them.
Question: How many more airports were unpaved than paved? | 780 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Air transportation Colombia was a pioneer in promoting airlines in an effort to overcome its geographic barriers to transportation. The Colombian Company of Air Navigation, formed in 1919, was the second commercial airline in the world. It was not until the 1940s that Colombias air transportation began growing significantly in the number of companies, passengers carried, and kilometers covered. In the early 2000s, an average of 72 percent of the passengers transported by air go to national destinations, while 28 percent travel internationally. One notable feature is that after the reforms of the beginning of the 1990s, the number of international passengers tripled by 2003. In 1993 the construction, administration, operation, and maintenance of the main airports transferred to departmental authorities and the private sector, including companies specializing in air transportation. Within this process, in 2006 the International Airport Operator (Opain), a Swiss-Colombian consortium, won the concession to manage and develop Bogotá’s El Dorado International Airport. El Dorado is the largest airport in Latin America in terms of cargo traffic (33rd worldwide), with 622,145 metric tons in 2013, second in terms of traffic movements (45th worldwide) and third in terms of passengers (50th among the busiest airports in the world). In addition to El Dorado, Colombia’s international airports are Palo Negro in Bucaramanga, Simón Bolívar in Santa Marta, Cortissoz in Barranquilla, Rafael Núñez in Cartagena, José María Córdova in Rionegro near Medellín, Alfonso Bonilla Aragón in Cali, Alfredo Vásquez Cobo in Leticia, Matecaña in Pereira, Gustavo Rojas Pinilla in San Andrés, and Camilo Daza in Cúcuta. In 2006 Colombia was generally reported to have a total of 984 airports, of which 103 had paved runways and 883 were unpaved. The Ministry of Transportation listed 581 airports in 2007, but it may have used a different methodology for counting them.
Question: How many more airports were unpaved than paved?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
780<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Universal initially set a budget of $10 million, with a modest $200,000 for "creature effects," which at the time was more than the studio had ever allocated to a monster film. Filming was scheduled to be completed within 98 days. Universals production studios estimated that it would require at least $17 million before marketing and other costs, as the plan involved more set construction, including external sets and a large set piece for the original scripted death of Bennings, which was estimated to cost $1.5 million alone. As storyboarding and designs were finalized, the crew estimated they would need at least $750,000 for creature effects, a figure Universal executives agreed to after seeing the number of workers employed under Rob Bottin, the special make-up effects designer. Associate producer Larry Franco was responsible for making the budget work for the film; he cut the filming schedule by a third, eliminated the exterior sets for on-site shooting, and removed Benningss more extravagant death scene. Cohen suggested reusing the destroyed American camp as the ruined Norwegian camp, saving a further $250,000. When filming began in August, The Thing had a budget of $11.4 million, and indirect costs brought it to $14 million. The effects budget eventually ran over by $1.5 million, forcing the elimination of some scenes, including Naulss confrontation of a creature dubbed the "box Thing". By the end of production, Carpenter had to make a personal appeal to executive Ned Tanen for $100,000 to complete a simplified version of the Blair-Thing. The final cost was $12.4 million, and overhead costs brought it to $15 million.
Question: Which amount was higher, the budget Universal set for "creature effects" or the amount the crew estimated they would need? | crew estimated they would need | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Universal initially set a budget of $10 million, with a modest $200,000 for "creature effects," which at the time was more than the studio had ever allocated to a monster film. Filming was scheduled to be completed within 98 days. Universals production studios estimated that it would require at least $17 million before marketing and other costs, as the plan involved more set construction, including external sets and a large set piece for the original scripted death of Bennings, which was estimated to cost $1.5 million alone. As storyboarding and designs were finalized, the crew estimated they would need at least $750,000 for creature effects, a figure Universal executives agreed to after seeing the number of workers employed under Rob Bottin, the special make-up effects designer. Associate producer Larry Franco was responsible for making the budget work for the film; he cut the filming schedule by a third, eliminated the exterior sets for on-site shooting, and removed Benningss more extravagant death scene. Cohen suggested reusing the destroyed American camp as the ruined Norwegian camp, saving a further $250,000. When filming began in August, The Thing had a budget of $11.4 million, and indirect costs brought it to $14 million. The effects budget eventually ran over by $1.5 million, forcing the elimination of some scenes, including Naulss confrontation of a creature dubbed the "box Thing". By the end of production, Carpenter had to make a personal appeal to executive Ned Tanen for $100,000 to complete a simplified version of the Blair-Thing. The final cost was $12.4 million, and overhead costs brought it to $15 million.
Question: Which amount was higher, the budget Universal set for "creature effects" or the amount the crew estimated they would need?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
crew estimated they would need<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Universal initially set a budget of $10 million, with a modest $200,000 for "creature effects," which at the time was more than the studio had ever allocated to a monster film. Filming was scheduled to be completed within 98 days. Universals production studios estimated that it would require at least $17 million before marketing and other costs, as the plan involved more set construction, including external sets and a large set piece for the original scripted death of Bennings, which was estimated to cost $1.5 million alone. As storyboarding and designs were finalized, the crew estimated they would need at least $750,000 for creature effects, a figure Universal executives agreed to after seeing the number of workers employed under Rob Bottin, the special make-up effects designer. Associate producer Larry Franco was responsible for making the budget work for the film; he cut the filming schedule by a third, eliminated the exterior sets for on-site shooting, and removed Benningss more extravagant death scene. Cohen suggested reusing the destroyed American camp as the ruined Norwegian camp, saving a further $250,000. When filming began in August, The Thing had a budget of $11.4 million, and indirect costs brought it to $14 million. The effects budget eventually ran over by $1.5 million, forcing the elimination of some scenes, including Naulss confrontation of a creature dubbed the "box Thing". By the end of production, Carpenter had to make a personal appeal to executive Ned Tanen for $100,000 to complete a simplified version of the Blair-Thing. The final cost was $12.4 million, and overhead costs brought it to $15 million.
Question: How many more dollars did the crew estimate would be needed for creature effects compared to the budget given by Universal? | 550000 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Universal initially set a budget of $10 million, with a modest $200,000 for "creature effects," which at the time was more than the studio had ever allocated to a monster film. Filming was scheduled to be completed within 98 days. Universals production studios estimated that it would require at least $17 million before marketing and other costs, as the plan involved more set construction, including external sets and a large set piece for the original scripted death of Bennings, which was estimated to cost $1.5 million alone. As storyboarding and designs were finalized, the crew estimated they would need at least $750,000 for creature effects, a figure Universal executives agreed to after seeing the number of workers employed under Rob Bottin, the special make-up effects designer. Associate producer Larry Franco was responsible for making the budget work for the film; he cut the filming schedule by a third, eliminated the exterior sets for on-site shooting, and removed Benningss more extravagant death scene. Cohen suggested reusing the destroyed American camp as the ruined Norwegian camp, saving a further $250,000. When filming began in August, The Thing had a budget of $11.4 million, and indirect costs brought it to $14 million. The effects budget eventually ran over by $1.5 million, forcing the elimination of some scenes, including Naulss confrontation of a creature dubbed the "box Thing". By the end of production, Carpenter had to make a personal appeal to executive Ned Tanen for $100,000 to complete a simplified version of the Blair-Thing. The final cost was $12.4 million, and overhead costs brought it to $15 million.
Question: How many more dollars did the crew estimate would be needed for creature effects compared to the budget given by Universal?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
550000<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Universal initially set a budget of $10 million, with a modest $200,000 for "creature effects," which at the time was more than the studio had ever allocated to a monster film. Filming was scheduled to be completed within 98 days. Universals production studios estimated that it would require at least $17 million before marketing and other costs, as the plan involved more set construction, including external sets and a large set piece for the original scripted death of Bennings, which was estimated to cost $1.5 million alone. As storyboarding and designs were finalized, the crew estimated they would need at least $750,000 for creature effects, a figure Universal executives agreed to after seeing the number of workers employed under Rob Bottin, the special make-up effects designer. Associate producer Larry Franco was responsible for making the budget work for the film; he cut the filming schedule by a third, eliminated the exterior sets for on-site shooting, and removed Benningss more extravagant death scene. Cohen suggested reusing the destroyed American camp as the ruined Norwegian camp, saving a further $250,000. When filming began in August, The Thing had a budget of $11.4 million, and indirect costs brought it to $14 million. The effects budget eventually ran over by $1.5 million, forcing the elimination of some scenes, including Naulss confrontation of a creature dubbed the "box Thing". By the end of production, Carpenter had to make a personal appeal to executive Ned Tanen for $100,000 to complete a simplified version of the Blair-Thing. The final cost was $12.4 million, and overhead costs brought it to $15 million.
Question: How many more millions of dollars did The Thing cost to make compared to how much it was budgeted for? | 1 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Universal initially set a budget of $10 million, with a modest $200,000 for "creature effects," which at the time was more than the studio had ever allocated to a monster film. Filming was scheduled to be completed within 98 days. Universals production studios estimated that it would require at least $17 million before marketing and other costs, as the plan involved more set construction, including external sets and a large set piece for the original scripted death of Bennings, which was estimated to cost $1.5 million alone. As storyboarding and designs were finalized, the crew estimated they would need at least $750,000 for creature effects, a figure Universal executives agreed to after seeing the number of workers employed under Rob Bottin, the special make-up effects designer. Associate producer Larry Franco was responsible for making the budget work for the film; he cut the filming schedule by a third, eliminated the exterior sets for on-site shooting, and removed Benningss more extravagant death scene. Cohen suggested reusing the destroyed American camp as the ruined Norwegian camp, saving a further $250,000. When filming began in August, The Thing had a budget of $11.4 million, and indirect costs brought it to $14 million. The effects budget eventually ran over by $1.5 million, forcing the elimination of some scenes, including Naulss confrontation of a creature dubbed the "box Thing". By the end of production, Carpenter had to make a personal appeal to executive Ned Tanen for $100,000 to complete a simplified version of the Blair-Thing. The final cost was $12.4 million, and overhead costs brought it to $15 million.
Question: How many more millions of dollars did The Thing cost to make compared to how much it was budgeted for?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
1<end_of_turn>
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.