instruction stringlengths 209 9.87k | response stringlengths 2 279 | text stringlengths 290 9.95k |
|---|---|---|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: How many percent larger is the average family size than household size? | .66 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: How many percent larger is the average family size than household size?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
.66<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: which household was most common? | non-families | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: which household was most common?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
non-families<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: which household was second most common? | married couples living together | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: which household was second most common?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
married couples living together<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: which household was third most common? | made up of individuals | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: which household was third most common?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
made up of individuals<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: which household was fourth most common? | under the age of 18 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: which household was fourth most common?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
under the age of 18<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: which household was least common? | 65 years of age | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: which household was least common?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
65 years of age<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: Which groups in average are under 4 in size? | household size family size | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: Which groups in average are under 4 in size?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
household size family size<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: How many in percent of households didn't have children under the age of 18 living with them? | 70.2 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: How many in percent of households didn't have children under the age of 18 living with them?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
70.2<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: How many in percent of households weren't married couples living together? | 61.8 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: How many in percent of households weren't married couples living together?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
61.8<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: How many in percent of households had a female householder with a husband present? | 82.8 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: How many in percent of households had a female householder with a husband present?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
82.8<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: How many in percent of households were families? | 60 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: How many in percent of households were families?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
60<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: How many in percent of households weren't made up of individuals? | 67.2 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: How many in percent of households weren't made up of individuals?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
67.2<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: How many in percent of households had someone living alone who wasn't 65 years of age or older? | 89 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: How many in percent of households had someone living alone who wasn't 65 years of age or older?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
89<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: Which group for households is larger: married couples living together or non-families? | non-families | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: Which group for households is larger: married couples living together or non-families?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
non-families<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: Which group for households is smaller: married couples living together or non-families? | married couples living together | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: Which group for households is smaller: married couples living together or non-families?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
married couples living together<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: Which group for households is larger: married couples living together or made up of individuals? | married couples living together | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: Which group for households is larger: married couples living together or made up of individuals?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
married couples living together<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: Which group for households is smaller: married couples living together or made up of individuals? | made up of individuals | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: Which group for households is smaller: married couples living together or made up of individuals?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
made up of individuals<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: Which group for households is larger: average family size or average household size? | average family size | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: Which group for households is larger: average family size or average household size?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
average family size<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: Which groups in average are under 5 in size? | household size family size | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: Which groups in average are under 5 in size?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
household size family size<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: How many in percent of households didn't have children under the age of 18 living with them? | 70.2 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: How many in percent of households didn't have children under the age of 18 living with them?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
70.2<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: How many in percent of households weren't married couples living together? | 61.8 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: How many in percent of households weren't married couples living together?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
61.8<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: How many in percent of households had a female householder with a husband present? | 82.8 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: How many in percent of households had a female householder with a husband present?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
82.8<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: How many in percent of households were families? | 60 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: How many in percent of households were families?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
60<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: How many in percent of households weren't made up of individuals? | 67.2 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: How many in percent of households weren't made up of individuals?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
67.2<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: How many in percent of households had someone living alone who wasn't 65 years of age or older? | 89 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: How many in percent of households had someone living alone who wasn't 65 years of age or older?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
89<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: Which group for households is larger: married couples living together or non-families? | non-families | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: Which group for households is larger: married couples living together or non-families?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
non-families<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: Which group for households is smaller: married couples living together or non-families? | married couples living together | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: Which group for households is smaller: married couples living together or non-families?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
married couples living together<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: Which group for households is larger: married couples living together or made up of individuals? | married couples living together | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: Which group for households is larger: married couples living together or made up of individuals?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
married couples living together<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: Which group for households is smaller: married couples living together or made up of individuals? | made up of individuals | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: Which group for households is smaller: married couples living together or made up of individuals?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
made up of individuals<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: Which group for households is larger: average family size or average household size? | average family size | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2000 there were 128,925 households in Toledo, out of which 29.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 38.2% were married couples living together, 17.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 32.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.04.
Question: Which group for households is larger: average family size or average household size?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
average family size<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: Which religion in Addis Ababa has a higherpercentage than Pentay? | Orthodox Islam | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: Which religion in Addis Ababa has a higherpercentage than Pentay?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Orthodox Islam<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: Which groups has the highest percentage than the Silte? | Amhara Oromo Gurage Tigrayans | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: Which groups has the highest percentage than the Silte?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Amhara Oromo Gurage Tigrayans<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: Which ethnic group was the second largest in Addis Ababa? | Oromo people | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: Which ethnic group was the second largest in Addis Ababa?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Oromo people<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: Which ethnic group was the fourth largest in Addis Ababa? | Tigrayans | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: Which ethnic group was the fourth largest in Addis Ababa?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Tigrayans<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: How many more people, in terms of percentage, spoke Amharic compared to Oromo and Gurage combined? | 51.93 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: How many more people, in terms of percentage, spoke Amharic compared to Oromo and Gurage combined?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
51.93<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: How many more people, in terms of percentage, spoke Amharic compared to Oromo and the Tigrinya language combined? | 56.7 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: How many more people, in terms of percentage, spoke Amharic compared to Oromo and the Tigrinya language combined?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
56.7<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: Which is the second largest ethnic group in Addis Ababa? | Oromo | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: Which is the second largest ethnic group in Addis Ababa?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Oromo<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: Which is the third largest ethnic group in Addis Ababa? | Gurage Islam in Ethiopia | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: Which is the third largest ethnic group in Addis Ababa?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Gurage Islam in Ethiopia<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: Which is the smallest ethnic group in Addis Ababa? | Gamo | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: Which is the smallest ethnic group in Addis Ababa?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Gamo<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: Which ethnic groups in Addis Ababa have more than 15% of the population? | Amhara Oromo Gurage | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: Which ethnic groups in Addis Ababa have more than 15% of the population?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Amhara Oromo Gurage<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: Which ethnic groups in Addis Ababa have less than 5% of the population each? | Silte Gamo | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: Which ethnic groups in Addis Ababa have less than 5% of the population each?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Silte Gamo<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: How many percent do the Gamo, Silte and Tigrayans ethnicities make combined? | 9.8 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: How many percent do the Gamo, Silte and Tigrayans ethnicities make combined?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
9.8<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: How many more percent are Amhara than both Oromo and Gurage? | 31.7 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: How many more percent are Amhara than both Oromo and Gurage?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
31.7<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: How many more percent speak Amharic language compared to Gamo? | 69.97 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: How many more percent speak Amharic language compared to Gamo?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
69.97<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: How many percent of people speak the lowest three percentages of languages combined? | 6.45 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: How many percent of people speak the lowest three percentages of languages combined?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
6.45<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: Which languages are spoken by more than 7% of the population? | Amharic Oromo Gurage | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: Which languages are spoken by more than 7% of the population?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Amharic Oromo Gurage<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: How many percent of people believe in either Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church or Islam in Ethiopia? | 90.9 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: How many percent of people believe in either Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church or Islam in Ethiopia?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
90.9<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: Do more people believe in Islam in Ethiopia or Pentay? | Islam in Ethiopia | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: Do more people believe in Islam in Ethiopia or Pentay?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Islam in Ethiopia<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: How many percent of people were not Amhara? | 32.96 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: How many percent of people were not Amhara?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
32.96<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: How many percent of people were not Oromo? | 81 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of the latest 2007 population census conducted by the Ethiopian national statistics authorities, Addis Ababa has a total population of 2,739,551 urban and rural inhabitants. For the capital city 662,728 households were counted living in 628,984 housing units, which results in an average of 5.3 persons to a household. Although all Ethiopian ethnic groups are represented in Addis Ababa because it is the capital of the country, the largest groups include the Amhara (ethnicity) (67.04%), Oromo people (19.00%), Gurage (16.34%), Tigrayans (5.18%), Silte people (2.94%), and Gamo people (1.68%). Languages spoken include Amharic language (71.0%), Oromo language (10.7%), Gurage language (8.37%), Tigrinya language (3.60%), Silte language (1.82%) and Gamo language (1.03%). The religion with the most believers in Addis Ababa is Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church with 74.7% of the population, while 16.2% are Islam in Ethiopia, 7.77% Pentay, and 0.48% Roman Catholicism in Ethiopia.
Question: How many percent of people were not Oromo?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
81<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: From the , 47,225 people (37.8% of the population) were Roman Catholic, while 33,993 (27.2%) belonged to the Swiss Reformed Church. Of the rest of the population, there were 2,698 Orthodox Christianity (2.16%), there were 65 individuals (0.05%) who belonged to the Christian Catholic Church of Switzerland, and there were 4,437 individuals (3.55%) who belonged to another Christian church. There were 849 individuals (0.68%) who were Judaism, and 7,501 (6.00%) who were Muslim. There were 452 individuals who were Buddhism, 772 individuals who were Hinduism and 343 individuals who belonged to another church. 21,080 (16.88%) belonged to no church, were Agnosticism or Atheism, and 7,590 individuals (6.08%) did not answer the question.
Question: How many percent of the population were not Roman Catholic? | 62.19 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: From the , 47,225 people (37.8% of the population) were Roman Catholic, while 33,993 (27.2%) belonged to the Swiss Reformed Church. Of the rest of the population, there were 2,698 Orthodox Christianity (2.16%), there were 65 individuals (0.05%) who belonged to the Christian Catholic Church of Switzerland, and there were 4,437 individuals (3.55%) who belonged to another Christian church. There were 849 individuals (0.68%) who were Judaism, and 7,501 (6.00%) who were Muslim. There were 452 individuals who were Buddhism, 772 individuals who were Hinduism and 343 individuals who belonged to another church. 21,080 (16.88%) belonged to no church, were Agnosticism or Atheism, and 7,590 individuals (6.08%) did not answer the question.
Question: How many percent of the population were not Roman Catholic?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
62.19<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: From the , 47,225 people (37.8% of the population) were Roman Catholic, while 33,993 (27.2%) belonged to the Swiss Reformed Church. Of the rest of the population, there were 2,698 Orthodox Christianity (2.16%), there were 65 individuals (0.05%) who belonged to the Christian Catholic Church of Switzerland, and there were 4,437 individuals (3.55%) who belonged to another Christian church. There were 849 individuals (0.68%) who were Judaism, and 7,501 (6.00%) who were Muslim. There were 452 individuals who were Buddhism, 772 individuals who were Hinduism and 343 individuals who belonged to another church. 21,080 (16.88%) belonged to no church, were Agnosticism or Atheism, and 7,590 individuals (6.08%) did not answer the question.
Question: How many percent of the population did not belong to the Swiss Reformed Church? | 72.8 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: From the , 47,225 people (37.8% of the population) were Roman Catholic, while 33,993 (27.2%) belonged to the Swiss Reformed Church. Of the rest of the population, there were 2,698 Orthodox Christianity (2.16%), there were 65 individuals (0.05%) who belonged to the Christian Catholic Church of Switzerland, and there were 4,437 individuals (3.55%) who belonged to another Christian church. There were 849 individuals (0.68%) who were Judaism, and 7,501 (6.00%) who were Muslim. There were 452 individuals who were Buddhism, 772 individuals who were Hinduism and 343 individuals who belonged to another church. 21,080 (16.88%) belonged to no church, were Agnosticism or Atheism, and 7,590 individuals (6.08%) did not answer the question.
Question: How many percent of the population did not belong to the Swiss Reformed Church?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
72.8<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: From the , 47,225 people (37.8% of the population) were Roman Catholic, while 33,993 (27.2%) belonged to the Swiss Reformed Church. Of the rest of the population, there were 2,698 Orthodox Christianity (2.16%), there were 65 individuals (0.05%) who belonged to the Christian Catholic Church of Switzerland, and there were 4,437 individuals (3.55%) who belonged to another Christian church. There were 849 individuals (0.68%) who were Judaism, and 7,501 (6.00%) who were Muslim. There were 452 individuals who were Buddhism, 772 individuals who were Hinduism and 343 individuals who belonged to another church. 21,080 (16.88%) belonged to no church, were Agnosticism or Atheism, and 7,590 individuals (6.08%) did not answer the question.
Question: Which were there more of, Roman Catholics or people who belonged to the Swiss Reformed Church? | Roman Catholic | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: From the , 47,225 people (37.8% of the population) were Roman Catholic, while 33,993 (27.2%) belonged to the Swiss Reformed Church. Of the rest of the population, there were 2,698 Orthodox Christianity (2.16%), there were 65 individuals (0.05%) who belonged to the Christian Catholic Church of Switzerland, and there were 4,437 individuals (3.55%) who belonged to another Christian church. There were 849 individuals (0.68%) who were Judaism, and 7,501 (6.00%) who were Muslim. There were 452 individuals who were Buddhism, 772 individuals who were Hinduism and 343 individuals who belonged to another church. 21,080 (16.88%) belonged to no church, were Agnosticism or Atheism, and 7,590 individuals (6.08%) did not answer the question.
Question: Which were there more of, Roman Catholics or people who belonged to the Swiss Reformed Church?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Roman Catholic<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: From the , 47,225 people (37.8% of the population) were Roman Catholic, while 33,993 (27.2%) belonged to the Swiss Reformed Church. Of the rest of the population, there were 2,698 Orthodox Christianity (2.16%), there were 65 individuals (0.05%) who belonged to the Christian Catholic Church of Switzerland, and there were 4,437 individuals (3.55%) who belonged to another Christian church. There were 849 individuals (0.68%) who were Judaism, and 7,501 (6.00%) who were Muslim. There were 452 individuals who were Buddhism, 772 individuals who were Hinduism and 343 individuals who belonged to another church. 21,080 (16.88%) belonged to no church, were Agnosticism or Atheism, and 7,590 individuals (6.08%) did not answer the question.
Question: How many more Roman Catholics were there compared to those who belonged to the Swiss Reformed Church? | 13232 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: From the , 47,225 people (37.8% of the population) were Roman Catholic, while 33,993 (27.2%) belonged to the Swiss Reformed Church. Of the rest of the population, there were 2,698 Orthodox Christianity (2.16%), there were 65 individuals (0.05%) who belonged to the Christian Catholic Church of Switzerland, and there were 4,437 individuals (3.55%) who belonged to another Christian church. There were 849 individuals (0.68%) who were Judaism, and 7,501 (6.00%) who were Muslim. There were 452 individuals who were Buddhism, 772 individuals who were Hinduism and 343 individuals who belonged to another church. 21,080 (16.88%) belonged to no church, were Agnosticism or Atheism, and 7,590 individuals (6.08%) did not answer the question.
Question: How many more Roman Catholics were there compared to those who belonged to the Swiss Reformed Church?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
13232<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: From the , 47,225 people (37.8% of the population) were Roman Catholic, while 33,993 (27.2%) belonged to the Swiss Reformed Church. Of the rest of the population, there were 2,698 Orthodox Christianity (2.16%), there were 65 individuals (0.05%) who belonged to the Christian Catholic Church of Switzerland, and there were 4,437 individuals (3.55%) who belonged to another Christian church. There were 849 individuals (0.68%) who were Judaism, and 7,501 (6.00%) who were Muslim. There were 452 individuals who were Buddhism, 772 individuals who were Hinduism and 343 individuals who belonged to another church. 21,080 (16.88%) belonged to no church, were Agnosticism or Atheism, and 7,590 individuals (6.08%) did not answer the question.
Question: How many percent of the population did not practice Orthodox Christianity? | 97.84 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: From the , 47,225 people (37.8% of the population) were Roman Catholic, while 33,993 (27.2%) belonged to the Swiss Reformed Church. Of the rest of the population, there were 2,698 Orthodox Christianity (2.16%), there were 65 individuals (0.05%) who belonged to the Christian Catholic Church of Switzerland, and there were 4,437 individuals (3.55%) who belonged to another Christian church. There were 849 individuals (0.68%) who were Judaism, and 7,501 (6.00%) who were Muslim. There were 452 individuals who were Buddhism, 772 individuals who were Hinduism and 343 individuals who belonged to another church. 21,080 (16.88%) belonged to no church, were Agnosticism or Atheism, and 7,590 individuals (6.08%) did not answer the question.
Question: How many percent of the population did not practice Orthodox Christianity?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
97.84<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: From the , 47,225 people (37.8% of the population) were Roman Catholic, while 33,993 (27.2%) belonged to the Swiss Reformed Church. Of the rest of the population, there were 2,698 Orthodox Christianity (2.16%), there were 65 individuals (0.05%) who belonged to the Christian Catholic Church of Switzerland, and there were 4,437 individuals (3.55%) who belonged to another Christian church. There were 849 individuals (0.68%) who were Judaism, and 7,501 (6.00%) who were Muslim. There were 452 individuals who were Buddhism, 772 individuals who were Hinduism and 343 individuals who belonged to another church. 21,080 (16.88%) belonged to no church, were Agnosticism or Atheism, and 7,590 individuals (6.08%) did not answer the question.
Question: Which were the two most practiced religions of the people in the population? | Roman Catholic Swiss Reformed Church | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: From the , 47,225 people (37.8% of the population) were Roman Catholic, while 33,993 (27.2%) belonged to the Swiss Reformed Church. Of the rest of the population, there were 2,698 Orthodox Christianity (2.16%), there were 65 individuals (0.05%) who belonged to the Christian Catholic Church of Switzerland, and there were 4,437 individuals (3.55%) who belonged to another Christian church. There were 849 individuals (0.68%) who were Judaism, and 7,501 (6.00%) who were Muslim. There were 452 individuals who were Buddhism, 772 individuals who were Hinduism and 343 individuals who belonged to another church. 21,080 (16.88%) belonged to no church, were Agnosticism or Atheism, and 7,590 individuals (6.08%) did not answer the question.
Question: Which were the two most practiced religions of the people in the population?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Roman Catholic Swiss Reformed Church<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: From the , 47,225 people (37.8% of the population) were Roman Catholic, while 33,993 (27.2%) belonged to the Swiss Reformed Church. Of the rest of the population, there were 2,698 Orthodox Christianity (2.16%), there were 65 individuals (0.05%) who belonged to the Christian Catholic Church of Switzerland, and there were 4,437 individuals (3.55%) who belonged to another Christian church. There were 849 individuals (0.68%) who were Judaism, and 7,501 (6.00%) who were Muslim. There were 452 individuals who were Buddhism, 772 individuals who were Hinduism and 343 individuals who belonged to another church. 21,080 (16.88%) belonged to no church, were Agnosticism or Atheism, and 7,590 individuals (6.08%) did not answer the question.
Question: Which religion did more people practice, Buddhism or Hinduism? | Hinduism | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: From the , 47,225 people (37.8% of the population) were Roman Catholic, while 33,993 (27.2%) belonged to the Swiss Reformed Church. Of the rest of the population, there were 2,698 Orthodox Christianity (2.16%), there were 65 individuals (0.05%) who belonged to the Christian Catholic Church of Switzerland, and there were 4,437 individuals (3.55%) who belonged to another Christian church. There were 849 individuals (0.68%) who were Judaism, and 7,501 (6.00%) who were Muslim. There were 452 individuals who were Buddhism, 772 individuals who were Hinduism and 343 individuals who belonged to another church. 21,080 (16.88%) belonged to no church, were Agnosticism or Atheism, and 7,590 individuals (6.08%) did not answer the question.
Question: Which religion did more people practice, Buddhism or Hinduism?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Hinduism<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: From the , 47,225 people (37.8% of the population) were Roman Catholic, while 33,993 (27.2%) belonged to the Swiss Reformed Church. Of the rest of the population, there were 2,698 Orthodox Christianity (2.16%), there were 65 individuals (0.05%) who belonged to the Christian Catholic Church of Switzerland, and there were 4,437 individuals (3.55%) who belonged to another Christian church. There were 849 individuals (0.68%) who were Judaism, and 7,501 (6.00%) who were Muslim. There were 452 individuals who were Buddhism, 772 individuals who were Hinduism and 343 individuals who belonged to another church. 21,080 (16.88%) belonged to no church, were Agnosticism or Atheism, and 7,590 individuals (6.08%) did not answer the question.
Question: How many percent of the population did not practice Judaism? | 99.32 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: From the , 47,225 people (37.8% of the population) were Roman Catholic, while 33,993 (27.2%) belonged to the Swiss Reformed Church. Of the rest of the population, there were 2,698 Orthodox Christianity (2.16%), there were 65 individuals (0.05%) who belonged to the Christian Catholic Church of Switzerland, and there were 4,437 individuals (3.55%) who belonged to another Christian church. There were 849 individuals (0.68%) who were Judaism, and 7,501 (6.00%) who were Muslim. There were 452 individuals who were Buddhism, 772 individuals who were Hinduism and 343 individuals who belonged to another church. 21,080 (16.88%) belonged to no church, were Agnosticism or Atheism, and 7,590 individuals (6.08%) did not answer the question.
Question: How many percent of the population did not practice Judaism?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
99.32<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: From the , 47,225 people (37.8% of the population) were Roman Catholic, while 33,993 (27.2%) belonged to the Swiss Reformed Church. Of the rest of the population, there were 2,698 Orthodox Christianity (2.16%), there were 65 individuals (0.05%) who belonged to the Christian Catholic Church of Switzerland, and there were 4,437 individuals (3.55%) who belonged to another Christian church. There were 849 individuals (0.68%) who were Judaism, and 7,501 (6.00%) who were Muslim. There were 452 individuals who were Buddhism, 772 individuals who were Hinduism and 343 individuals who belonged to another church. 21,080 (16.88%) belonged to no church, were Agnosticism or Atheism, and 7,590 individuals (6.08%) did not answer the question.
Question: How many more people practiced Hinduism compared to Buddhism? | 320 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: From the , 47,225 people (37.8% of the population) were Roman Catholic, while 33,993 (27.2%) belonged to the Swiss Reformed Church. Of the rest of the population, there were 2,698 Orthodox Christianity (2.16%), there were 65 individuals (0.05%) who belonged to the Christian Catholic Church of Switzerland, and there were 4,437 individuals (3.55%) who belonged to another Christian church. There were 849 individuals (0.68%) who were Judaism, and 7,501 (6.00%) who were Muslim. There were 452 individuals who were Buddhism, 772 individuals who were Hinduism and 343 individuals who belonged to another church. 21,080 (16.88%) belonged to no church, were Agnosticism or Atheism, and 7,590 individuals (6.08%) did not answer the question.
Question: How many more people practiced Hinduism compared to Buddhism?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
320<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: From the , 47,225 people (37.8% of the population) were Roman Catholic, while 33,993 (27.2%) belonged to the Swiss Reformed Church. Of the rest of the population, there were 2,698 Orthodox Christianity (2.16%), there were 65 individuals (0.05%) who belonged to the Christian Catholic Church of Switzerland, and there were 4,437 individuals (3.55%) who belonged to another Christian church. There were 849 individuals (0.68%) who were Judaism, and 7,501 (6.00%) who were Muslim. There were 452 individuals who were Buddhism, 772 individuals who were Hinduism and 343 individuals who belonged to another church. 21,080 (16.88%) belonged to no church, were Agnosticism or Atheism, and 7,590 individuals (6.08%) did not answer the question.
Question: Were there more people who were Muslim or who followed Judaism? | Muslim | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: From the , 47,225 people (37.8% of the population) were Roman Catholic, while 33,993 (27.2%) belonged to the Swiss Reformed Church. Of the rest of the population, there were 2,698 Orthodox Christianity (2.16%), there were 65 individuals (0.05%) who belonged to the Christian Catholic Church of Switzerland, and there were 4,437 individuals (3.55%) who belonged to another Christian church. There were 849 individuals (0.68%) who were Judaism, and 7,501 (6.00%) who were Muslim. There were 452 individuals who were Buddhism, 772 individuals who were Hinduism and 343 individuals who belonged to another church. 21,080 (16.88%) belonged to no church, were Agnosticism or Atheism, and 7,590 individuals (6.08%) did not answer the question.
Question: Were there more people who were Muslim or who followed Judaism?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Muslim<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: From the , 47,225 people (37.8% of the population) were Roman Catholic, while 33,993 (27.2%) belonged to the Swiss Reformed Church. Of the rest of the population, there were 2,698 Orthodox Christianity (2.16%), there were 65 individuals (0.05%) who belonged to the Christian Catholic Church of Switzerland, and there were 4,437 individuals (3.55%) who belonged to another Christian church. There were 849 individuals (0.68%) who were Judaism, and 7,501 (6.00%) who were Muslim. There were 452 individuals who were Buddhism, 772 individuals who were Hinduism and 343 individuals who belonged to another church. 21,080 (16.88%) belonged to no church, were Agnosticism or Atheism, and 7,590 individuals (6.08%) did not answer the question.
Question: Were there more people who followed Buddhism or Hinduism? | Hinduism | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: From the , 47,225 people (37.8% of the population) were Roman Catholic, while 33,993 (27.2%) belonged to the Swiss Reformed Church. Of the rest of the population, there were 2,698 Orthodox Christianity (2.16%), there were 65 individuals (0.05%) who belonged to the Christian Catholic Church of Switzerland, and there were 4,437 individuals (3.55%) who belonged to another Christian church. There were 849 individuals (0.68%) who were Judaism, and 7,501 (6.00%) who were Muslim. There were 452 individuals who were Buddhism, 772 individuals who were Hinduism and 343 individuals who belonged to another church. 21,080 (16.88%) belonged to no church, were Agnosticism or Atheism, and 7,590 individuals (6.08%) did not answer the question.
Question: Were there more people who followed Buddhism or Hinduism?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Hinduism<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: From the , 47,225 people (37.8% of the population) were Roman Catholic, while 33,993 (27.2%) belonged to the Swiss Reformed Church. Of the rest of the population, there were 2,698 Orthodox Christianity (2.16%), there were 65 individuals (0.05%) who belonged to the Christian Catholic Church of Switzerland, and there were 4,437 individuals (3.55%) who belonged to another Christian church. There were 849 individuals (0.68%) who were Judaism, and 7,501 (6.00%) who were Muslim. There were 452 individuals who were Buddhism, 772 individuals who were Hinduism and 343 individuals who belonged to another church. 21,080 (16.88%) belonged to no church, were Agnosticism or Atheism, and 7,590 individuals (6.08%) did not answer the question.
Question: How many individuals were either Muslim, or did not answer the question? | 15091 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: From the , 47,225 people (37.8% of the population) were Roman Catholic, while 33,993 (27.2%) belonged to the Swiss Reformed Church. Of the rest of the population, there were 2,698 Orthodox Christianity (2.16%), there were 65 individuals (0.05%) who belonged to the Christian Catholic Church of Switzerland, and there were 4,437 individuals (3.55%) who belonged to another Christian church. There were 849 individuals (0.68%) who were Judaism, and 7,501 (6.00%) who were Muslim. There were 452 individuals who were Buddhism, 772 individuals who were Hinduism and 343 individuals who belonged to another church. 21,080 (16.88%) belonged to no church, were Agnosticism or Atheism, and 7,590 individuals (6.08%) did not answer the question.
Question: How many individuals were either Muslim, or did not answer the question?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
15091<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: From the , 47,225 people (37.8% of the population) were Roman Catholic, while 33,993 (27.2%) belonged to the Swiss Reformed Church. Of the rest of the population, there were 2,698 Orthodox Christianity (2.16%), there were 65 individuals (0.05%) who belonged to the Christian Catholic Church of Switzerland, and there were 4,437 individuals (3.55%) who belonged to another Christian church. There were 849 individuals (0.68%) who were Judaism, and 7,501 (6.00%) who were Muslim. There were 452 individuals who were Buddhism, 772 individuals who were Hinduism and 343 individuals who belonged to another church. 21,080 (16.88%) belonged to no church, were Agnosticism or Atheism, and 7,590 individuals (6.08%) did not answer the question.
Question: Which religious groups mentioned had at least 400 individuals belonging to them, but less than 1000? | Hinduism Judaism Buddhism | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: From the , 47,225 people (37.8% of the population) were Roman Catholic, while 33,993 (27.2%) belonged to the Swiss Reformed Church. Of the rest of the population, there were 2,698 Orthodox Christianity (2.16%), there were 65 individuals (0.05%) who belonged to the Christian Catholic Church of Switzerland, and there were 4,437 individuals (3.55%) who belonged to another Christian church. There were 849 individuals (0.68%) who were Judaism, and 7,501 (6.00%) who were Muslim. There were 452 individuals who were Buddhism, 772 individuals who were Hinduism and 343 individuals who belonged to another church. 21,080 (16.88%) belonged to no church, were Agnosticism or Atheism, and 7,590 individuals (6.08%) did not answer the question.
Question: Which religious groups mentioned had at least 400 individuals belonging to them, but less than 1000?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Hinduism Judaism Buddhism<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of 2018, Jakarta contributes about 17 percent to the Indonesia’s GDP, and plays vital of the country’s economic growth.The economic growth of Jakarta was 6.22 percent and 5.02 percent in 2017 and 2016 respectively. Throughout 2017, total value of investment in Jakarta was Rp 108.6 trillion, about USD 8 billion, which was an increase of 84.7 percent from the same period in 2016. In 2014, per capita GRDP of Jakarta inhabitants was Rp 174.87 million or USD 14,727. In 2015, GDP per capita in the city was estimated Rp 194.87 million or US$14,570. Last data update was on 2014 by end of year Jakarta have a GRDP (Gross Regional Domestic Product) was Rp. 1,761.407 trillion (around USD 148.53 billion) with economic growth above 6% per year since 2009. In 2007 growth in the transportation and communication (15.25%), construction (7.81%) and trade, hotel and restaurant sectors (6.88%). In 2007, GRDP (Gross Regional Domestic Product) was Rp. 566 trillion (around $US 56 billion). The largest contributions to GRDP were by finance, ownership and business services (29%); trade, hotel and restaurant sector (20%), and manufacturing industry sector (16%). In 2007, the increase in per capita GRDP of Jakarta inhabitants was 11.6% compared to the previous year Both GRDP by at current market price and GRDP by at 2000 constant price in 2007 for the Municipality of Central Jakarta, which was Rp 146 million and Rp 81 million, was higher than other municipalities in Jakarta.
Question: Which year saw a higher economic growth for Jakarta, 2017 or 2016? | 2017 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of 2018, Jakarta contributes about 17 percent to the Indonesia’s GDP, and plays vital of the country’s economic growth.The economic growth of Jakarta was 6.22 percent and 5.02 percent in 2017 and 2016 respectively. Throughout 2017, total value of investment in Jakarta was Rp 108.6 trillion, about USD 8 billion, which was an increase of 84.7 percent from the same period in 2016. In 2014, per capita GRDP of Jakarta inhabitants was Rp 174.87 million or USD 14,727. In 2015, GDP per capita in the city was estimated Rp 194.87 million or US$14,570. Last data update was on 2014 by end of year Jakarta have a GRDP (Gross Regional Domestic Product) was Rp. 1,761.407 trillion (around USD 148.53 billion) with economic growth above 6% per year since 2009. In 2007 growth in the transportation and communication (15.25%), construction (7.81%) and trade, hotel and restaurant sectors (6.88%). In 2007, GRDP (Gross Regional Domestic Product) was Rp. 566 trillion (around $US 56 billion). The largest contributions to GRDP were by finance, ownership and business services (29%); trade, hotel and restaurant sector (20%), and manufacturing industry sector (16%). In 2007, the increase in per capita GRDP of Jakarta inhabitants was 11.6% compared to the previous year Both GRDP by at current market price and GRDP by at 2000 constant price in 2007 for the Municipality of Central Jakarta, which was Rp 146 million and Rp 81 million, was higher than other municipalities in Jakarta.
Question: Which year saw a higher economic growth for Jakarta, 2017 or 2016?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2017<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of 2018, Jakarta contributes about 17 percent to the Indonesia’s GDP, and plays vital of the country’s economic growth.The economic growth of Jakarta was 6.22 percent and 5.02 percent in 2017 and 2016 respectively. Throughout 2017, total value of investment in Jakarta was Rp 108.6 trillion, about USD 8 billion, which was an increase of 84.7 percent from the same period in 2016. In 2014, per capita GRDP of Jakarta inhabitants was Rp 174.87 million or USD 14,727. In 2015, GDP per capita in the city was estimated Rp 194.87 million or US$14,570. Last data update was on 2014 by end of year Jakarta have a GRDP (Gross Regional Domestic Product) was Rp. 1,761.407 trillion (around USD 148.53 billion) with economic growth above 6% per year since 2009. In 2007 growth in the transportation and communication (15.25%), construction (7.81%) and trade, hotel and restaurant sectors (6.88%). In 2007, GRDP (Gross Regional Domestic Product) was Rp. 566 trillion (around $US 56 billion). The largest contributions to GRDP were by finance, ownership and business services (29%); trade, hotel and restaurant sector (20%), and manufacturing industry sector (16%). In 2007, the increase in per capita GRDP of Jakarta inhabitants was 11.6% compared to the previous year Both GRDP by at current market price and GRDP by at 2000 constant price in 2007 for the Municipality of Central Jakarta, which was Rp 146 million and Rp 81 million, was higher than other municipalities in Jakarta.
Question: Which had a larger contribution to the GRDP, finance, ownership and business services or trade, hotel and restaurant sector ? | finance, ownership and business services | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of 2018, Jakarta contributes about 17 percent to the Indonesia’s GDP, and plays vital of the country’s economic growth.The economic growth of Jakarta was 6.22 percent and 5.02 percent in 2017 and 2016 respectively. Throughout 2017, total value of investment in Jakarta was Rp 108.6 trillion, about USD 8 billion, which was an increase of 84.7 percent from the same period in 2016. In 2014, per capita GRDP of Jakarta inhabitants was Rp 174.87 million or USD 14,727. In 2015, GDP per capita in the city was estimated Rp 194.87 million or US$14,570. Last data update was on 2014 by end of year Jakarta have a GRDP (Gross Regional Domestic Product) was Rp. 1,761.407 trillion (around USD 148.53 billion) with economic growth above 6% per year since 2009. In 2007 growth in the transportation and communication (15.25%), construction (7.81%) and trade, hotel and restaurant sectors (6.88%). In 2007, GRDP (Gross Regional Domestic Product) was Rp. 566 trillion (around $US 56 billion). The largest contributions to GRDP were by finance, ownership and business services (29%); trade, hotel and restaurant sector (20%), and manufacturing industry sector (16%). In 2007, the increase in per capita GRDP of Jakarta inhabitants was 11.6% compared to the previous year Both GRDP by at current market price and GRDP by at 2000 constant price in 2007 for the Municipality of Central Jakarta, which was Rp 146 million and Rp 81 million, was higher than other municipalities in Jakarta.
Question: Which had a larger contribution to the GRDP, finance, ownership and business services or trade, hotel and restaurant sector ?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
finance, ownership and business services<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Detroit advanced to the NBA Conference Finals for the sixth straight season, squaring off against the Celtics. This put the Pistons second on the all-time list of most consecutive conference finals appearances, only behind the Los Angeles Lakers who appeared in eight straight conference finals from the 1981-82 to 1988-89 seasons. They lost Game 1 88-79, but won in Game 2 on the road, 103-97, marking the Celtics first home court loss in the postseason. Immediately following that, the Celtics won their first road game of the postseason, 94-80, in Game 3. Game 4 saw the Pistons win 94-75. In the pivotal Game 5, they lost 106-102, despite rallying from 17 points down late in the game. In Game 6, the Pistons entered the fourth quarter leading 70-60, but a lack of focus, a poor game from Rasheed Wallace, and a rally-killing turnover by Tayshaun Prince ultimately led to their demise; the Pistons ended their season with an 89-81 loss. After that, the Celtics went on to win the 2008 NBA Finals. On June 3, 2008, the Pistons announced that Flip Saunders would not return as head coach.
Question: What year was the first season in six season streak that the Pistons made the Finals? | 2003 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Detroit advanced to the NBA Conference Finals for the sixth straight season, squaring off against the Celtics. This put the Pistons second on the all-time list of most consecutive conference finals appearances, only behind the Los Angeles Lakers who appeared in eight straight conference finals from the 1981-82 to 1988-89 seasons. They lost Game 1 88-79, but won in Game 2 on the road, 103-97, marking the Celtics first home court loss in the postseason. Immediately following that, the Celtics won their first road game of the postseason, 94-80, in Game 3. Game 4 saw the Pistons win 94-75. In the pivotal Game 5, they lost 106-102, despite rallying from 17 points down late in the game. In Game 6, the Pistons entered the fourth quarter leading 70-60, but a lack of focus, a poor game from Rasheed Wallace, and a rally-killing turnover by Tayshaun Prince ultimately led to their demise; the Pistons ended their season with an 89-81 loss. After that, the Celtics went on to win the 2008 NBA Finals. On June 3, 2008, the Pistons announced that Flip Saunders would not return as head coach.
Question: What year was the first season in six season streak that the Pistons made the Finals?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2003<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Detroit advanced to the NBA Conference Finals for the sixth straight season, squaring off against the Celtics. This put the Pistons second on the all-time list of most consecutive conference finals appearances, only behind the Los Angeles Lakers who appeared in eight straight conference finals from the 1981-82 to 1988-89 seasons. They lost Game 1 88-79, but won in Game 2 on the road, 103-97, marking the Celtics first home court loss in the postseason. Immediately following that, the Celtics won their first road game of the postseason, 94-80, in Game 3. Game 4 saw the Pistons win 94-75. In the pivotal Game 5, they lost 106-102, despite rallying from 17 points down late in the game. In Game 6, the Pistons entered the fourth quarter leading 70-60, but a lack of focus, a poor game from Rasheed Wallace, and a rally-killing turnover by Tayshaun Prince ultimately led to their demise; the Pistons ended their season with an 89-81 loss. After that, the Celtics went on to win the 2008 NBA Finals. On June 3, 2008, the Pistons announced that Flip Saunders would not return as head coach.
Question: How many playoff games did the Pistons play in 2008? | 6 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Detroit advanced to the NBA Conference Finals for the sixth straight season, squaring off against the Celtics. This put the Pistons second on the all-time list of most consecutive conference finals appearances, only behind the Los Angeles Lakers who appeared in eight straight conference finals from the 1981-82 to 1988-89 seasons. They lost Game 1 88-79, but won in Game 2 on the road, 103-97, marking the Celtics first home court loss in the postseason. Immediately following that, the Celtics won their first road game of the postseason, 94-80, in Game 3. Game 4 saw the Pistons win 94-75. In the pivotal Game 5, they lost 106-102, despite rallying from 17 points down late in the game. In Game 6, the Pistons entered the fourth quarter leading 70-60, but a lack of focus, a poor game from Rasheed Wallace, and a rally-killing turnover by Tayshaun Prince ultimately led to their demise; the Pistons ended their season with an 89-81 loss. After that, the Celtics went on to win the 2008 NBA Finals. On June 3, 2008, the Pistons announced that Flip Saunders would not return as head coach.
Question: How many playoff games did the Pistons play in 2008?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
6<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Detroit advanced to the NBA Conference Finals for the sixth straight season, squaring off against the Celtics. This put the Pistons second on the all-time list of most consecutive conference finals appearances, only behind the Los Angeles Lakers who appeared in eight straight conference finals from the 1981-82 to 1988-89 seasons. They lost Game 1 88-79, but won in Game 2 on the road, 103-97, marking the Celtics first home court loss in the postseason. Immediately following that, the Celtics won their first road game of the postseason, 94-80, in Game 3. Game 4 saw the Pistons win 94-75. In the pivotal Game 5, they lost 106-102, despite rallying from 17 points down late in the game. In Game 6, the Pistons entered the fourth quarter leading 70-60, but a lack of focus, a poor game from Rasheed Wallace, and a rally-killing turnover by Tayshaun Prince ultimately led to their demise; the Pistons ended their season with an 89-81 loss. After that, the Celtics went on to win the 2008 NBA Finals. On June 3, 2008, the Pistons announced that Flip Saunders would not return as head coach.
Question: What team beat the Celtics and won the NBA finals? | Pistons | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Detroit advanced to the NBA Conference Finals for the sixth straight season, squaring off against the Celtics. This put the Pistons second on the all-time list of most consecutive conference finals appearances, only behind the Los Angeles Lakers who appeared in eight straight conference finals from the 1981-82 to 1988-89 seasons. They lost Game 1 88-79, but won in Game 2 on the road, 103-97, marking the Celtics first home court loss in the postseason. Immediately following that, the Celtics won their first road game of the postseason, 94-80, in Game 3. Game 4 saw the Pistons win 94-75. In the pivotal Game 5, they lost 106-102, despite rallying from 17 points down late in the game. In Game 6, the Pistons entered the fourth quarter leading 70-60, but a lack of focus, a poor game from Rasheed Wallace, and a rally-killing turnover by Tayshaun Prince ultimately led to their demise; the Pistons ended their season with an 89-81 loss. After that, the Celtics went on to win the 2008 NBA Finals. On June 3, 2008, the Pistons announced that Flip Saunders would not return as head coach.
Question: What team beat the Celtics and won the NBA finals?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Pistons<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Detroit advanced to the NBA Conference Finals for the sixth straight season, squaring off against the Celtics. This put the Pistons second on the all-time list of most consecutive conference finals appearances, only behind the Los Angeles Lakers who appeared in eight straight conference finals from the 1981-82 to 1988-89 seasons. They lost Game 1 88-79, but won in Game 2 on the road, 103-97, marking the Celtics first home court loss in the postseason. Immediately following that, the Celtics won their first road game of the postseason, 94-80, in Game 3. Game 4 saw the Pistons win 94-75. In the pivotal Game 5, they lost 106-102, despite rallying from 17 points down late in the game. In Game 6, the Pistons entered the fourth quarter leading 70-60, but a lack of focus, a poor game from Rasheed Wallace, and a rally-killing turnover by Tayshaun Prince ultimately led to their demise; the Pistons ended their season with an 89-81 loss. After that, the Celtics went on to win the 2008 NBA Finals. On June 3, 2008, the Pistons announced that Flip Saunders would not return as head coach.
Question: Who lost game 2, the Pistons or the Celtics? | Celtics | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Detroit advanced to the NBA Conference Finals for the sixth straight season, squaring off against the Celtics. This put the Pistons second on the all-time list of most consecutive conference finals appearances, only behind the Los Angeles Lakers who appeared in eight straight conference finals from the 1981-82 to 1988-89 seasons. They lost Game 1 88-79, but won in Game 2 on the road, 103-97, marking the Celtics first home court loss in the postseason. Immediately following that, the Celtics won their first road game of the postseason, 94-80, in Game 3. Game 4 saw the Pistons win 94-75. In the pivotal Game 5, they lost 106-102, despite rallying from 17 points down late in the game. In Game 6, the Pistons entered the fourth quarter leading 70-60, but a lack of focus, a poor game from Rasheed Wallace, and a rally-killing turnover by Tayshaun Prince ultimately led to their demise; the Pistons ended their season with an 89-81 loss. After that, the Celtics went on to win the 2008 NBA Finals. On June 3, 2008, the Pistons announced that Flip Saunders would not return as head coach.
Question: Who lost game 2, the Pistons or the Celtics?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Celtics<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Detroit advanced to the NBA Conference Finals for the sixth straight season, squaring off against the Celtics. This put the Pistons second on the all-time list of most consecutive conference finals appearances, only behind the Los Angeles Lakers who appeared in eight straight conference finals from the 1981-82 to 1988-89 seasons. They lost Game 1 88-79, but won in Game 2 on the road, 103-97, marking the Celtics first home court loss in the postseason. Immediately following that, the Celtics won their first road game of the postseason, 94-80, in Game 3. Game 4 saw the Pistons win 94-75. In the pivotal Game 5, they lost 106-102, despite rallying from 17 points down late in the game. In Game 6, the Pistons entered the fourth quarter leading 70-60, but a lack of focus, a poor game from Rasheed Wallace, and a rally-killing turnover by Tayshaun Prince ultimately led to their demise; the Pistons ended their season with an 89-81 loss. After that, the Celtics went on to win the 2008 NBA Finals. On June 3, 2008, the Pistons announced that Flip Saunders would not return as head coach.
Question: How many points did the Celtics lose game 4 by? | 19 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Detroit advanced to the NBA Conference Finals for the sixth straight season, squaring off against the Celtics. This put the Pistons second on the all-time list of most consecutive conference finals appearances, only behind the Los Angeles Lakers who appeared in eight straight conference finals from the 1981-82 to 1988-89 seasons. They lost Game 1 88-79, but won in Game 2 on the road, 103-97, marking the Celtics first home court loss in the postseason. Immediately following that, the Celtics won their first road game of the postseason, 94-80, in Game 3. Game 4 saw the Pistons win 94-75. In the pivotal Game 5, they lost 106-102, despite rallying from 17 points down late in the game. In Game 6, the Pistons entered the fourth quarter leading 70-60, but a lack of focus, a poor game from Rasheed Wallace, and a rally-killing turnover by Tayshaun Prince ultimately led to their demise; the Pistons ended their season with an 89-81 loss. After that, the Celtics went on to win the 2008 NBA Finals. On June 3, 2008, the Pistons announced that Flip Saunders would not return as head coach.
Question: How many points did the Celtics lose game 4 by?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
19<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Detroit advanced to the NBA Conference Finals for the sixth straight season, squaring off against the Celtics. This put the Pistons second on the all-time list of most consecutive conference finals appearances, only behind the Los Angeles Lakers who appeared in eight straight conference finals from the 1981-82 to 1988-89 seasons. They lost Game 1 88-79, but won in Game 2 on the road, 103-97, marking the Celtics first home court loss in the postseason. Immediately following that, the Celtics won their first road game of the postseason, 94-80, in Game 3. Game 4 saw the Pistons win 94-75. In the pivotal Game 5, they lost 106-102, despite rallying from 17 points down late in the game. In Game 6, the Pistons entered the fourth quarter leading 70-60, but a lack of focus, a poor game from Rasheed Wallace, and a rally-killing turnover by Tayshaun Prince ultimately led to their demise; the Pistons ended their season with an 89-81 loss. After that, the Celtics went on to win the 2008 NBA Finals. On June 3, 2008, the Pistons announced that Flip Saunders would not return as head coach.
Question: Which team lost game 5, Celtics or Pistons? | Pistons | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Detroit advanced to the NBA Conference Finals for the sixth straight season, squaring off against the Celtics. This put the Pistons second on the all-time list of most consecutive conference finals appearances, only behind the Los Angeles Lakers who appeared in eight straight conference finals from the 1981-82 to 1988-89 seasons. They lost Game 1 88-79, but won in Game 2 on the road, 103-97, marking the Celtics first home court loss in the postseason. Immediately following that, the Celtics won their first road game of the postseason, 94-80, in Game 3. Game 4 saw the Pistons win 94-75. In the pivotal Game 5, they lost 106-102, despite rallying from 17 points down late in the game. In Game 6, the Pistons entered the fourth quarter leading 70-60, but a lack of focus, a poor game from Rasheed Wallace, and a rally-killing turnover by Tayshaun Prince ultimately led to their demise; the Pistons ended their season with an 89-81 loss. After that, the Celtics went on to win the 2008 NBA Finals. On June 3, 2008, the Pistons announced that Flip Saunders would not return as head coach.
Question: Which team lost game 5, Celtics or Pistons?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Pistons<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Detroit advanced to the NBA Conference Finals for the sixth straight season, squaring off against the Celtics. This put the Pistons second on the all-time list of most consecutive conference finals appearances, only behind the Los Angeles Lakers who appeared in eight straight conference finals from the 1981-82 to 1988-89 seasons. They lost Game 1 88-79, but won in Game 2 on the road, 103-97, marking the Celtics first home court loss in the postseason. Immediately following that, the Celtics won their first road game of the postseason, 94-80, in Game 3. Game 4 saw the Pistons win 94-75. In the pivotal Game 5, they lost 106-102, despite rallying from 17 points down late in the game. In Game 6, the Pistons entered the fourth quarter leading 70-60, but a lack of focus, a poor game from Rasheed Wallace, and a rally-killing turnover by Tayshaun Prince ultimately led to their demise; the Pistons ended their season with an 89-81 loss. After that, the Celtics went on to win the 2008 NBA Finals. On June 3, 2008, the Pistons announced that Flip Saunders would not return as head coach.
Question: Which game did the Pistons score more points in, Game 2 or Game 4? | Game 2 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Detroit advanced to the NBA Conference Finals for the sixth straight season, squaring off against the Celtics. This put the Pistons second on the all-time list of most consecutive conference finals appearances, only behind the Los Angeles Lakers who appeared in eight straight conference finals from the 1981-82 to 1988-89 seasons. They lost Game 1 88-79, but won in Game 2 on the road, 103-97, marking the Celtics first home court loss in the postseason. Immediately following that, the Celtics won their first road game of the postseason, 94-80, in Game 3. Game 4 saw the Pistons win 94-75. In the pivotal Game 5, they lost 106-102, despite rallying from 17 points down late in the game. In Game 6, the Pistons entered the fourth quarter leading 70-60, but a lack of focus, a poor game from Rasheed Wallace, and a rally-killing turnover by Tayshaun Prince ultimately led to their demise; the Pistons ended their season with an 89-81 loss. After that, the Celtics went on to win the 2008 NBA Finals. On June 3, 2008, the Pistons announced that Flip Saunders would not return as head coach.
Question: Which game did the Pistons score more points in, Game 2 or Game 4?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Game 2<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Detroit advanced to the NBA Conference Finals for the sixth straight season, squaring off against the Celtics. This put the Pistons second on the all-time list of most consecutive conference finals appearances, only behind the Los Angeles Lakers who appeared in eight straight conference finals from the 1981-82 to 1988-89 seasons. They lost Game 1 88-79, but won in Game 2 on the road, 103-97, marking the Celtics first home court loss in the postseason. Immediately following that, the Celtics won their first road game of the postseason, 94-80, in Game 3. Game 4 saw the Pistons win 94-75. In the pivotal Game 5, they lost 106-102, despite rallying from 17 points down late in the game. In Game 6, the Pistons entered the fourth quarter leading 70-60, but a lack of focus, a poor game from Rasheed Wallace, and a rally-killing turnover by Tayshaun Prince ultimately led to their demise; the Pistons ended their season with an 89-81 loss. After that, the Celtics went on to win the 2008 NBA Finals. On June 3, 2008, the Pistons announced that Flip Saunders would not return as head coach.
Question: Which team did not win the 2008 NBA Finals, Celtics or Pistons? | Pistons | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Detroit advanced to the NBA Conference Finals for the sixth straight season, squaring off against the Celtics. This put the Pistons second on the all-time list of most consecutive conference finals appearances, only behind the Los Angeles Lakers who appeared in eight straight conference finals from the 1981-82 to 1988-89 seasons. They lost Game 1 88-79, but won in Game 2 on the road, 103-97, marking the Celtics first home court loss in the postseason. Immediately following that, the Celtics won their first road game of the postseason, 94-80, in Game 3. Game 4 saw the Pistons win 94-75. In the pivotal Game 5, they lost 106-102, despite rallying from 17 points down late in the game. In Game 6, the Pistons entered the fourth quarter leading 70-60, but a lack of focus, a poor game from Rasheed Wallace, and a rally-killing turnover by Tayshaun Prince ultimately led to their demise; the Pistons ended their season with an 89-81 loss. After that, the Celtics went on to win the 2008 NBA Finals. On June 3, 2008, the Pistons announced that Flip Saunders would not return as head coach.
Question: Which team did not win the 2008 NBA Finals, Celtics or Pistons?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Pistons<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Dallas played into their traditional Thanksgiving home game, this time against division rival Philadelphia. Both teams were vying for first place in the division with identical 8-3 records. The Eagles got off to a fast start and the Cowboys were unable to catch up, losing 33-10. They would rebound the next week where on the road Thursday night game they defeated Chicago 41-28 for their 9th win of the year to clinch their first winning season since 2009. This was the first time that Dallas played on back to back Thursdays. Week 15 was a rematch against 1st place Philadelphia. This time it was the Cowboys who got off to a fast start going up 21-0. Then the Eagles put up 24 answered points but Dallas came back to win 38-27 to go into first place for the first time in the season and improve to 10-4. Going into their Week 16 matchup at home against Indianapolis, Dallas was in a position to clinch their first division title since 2009 by defeating the Colts thanks to the Eagles losing that week to the Redskins. They would not disappoint as they blew out the Colts 42-7 to become the 2014 NFC East Champions, eliminating the Eagles from the playoffs. Dallas would end the regular season with a 12-4 record and an 8-0 away record when they won on the road against Washington 44-17. They would also finish December 4-0 which was huge for the Cowboys since they had struggled in the recent years in the month of December.
Question: How many more points did the Cowboys score against the Colts than they did their first game against Philadelphia? | 32 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Dallas played into their traditional Thanksgiving home game, this time against division rival Philadelphia. Both teams were vying for first place in the division with identical 8-3 records. The Eagles got off to a fast start and the Cowboys were unable to catch up, losing 33-10. They would rebound the next week where on the road Thursday night game they defeated Chicago 41-28 for their 9th win of the year to clinch their first winning season since 2009. This was the first time that Dallas played on back to back Thursdays. Week 15 was a rematch against 1st place Philadelphia. This time it was the Cowboys who got off to a fast start going up 21-0. Then the Eagles put up 24 answered points but Dallas came back to win 38-27 to go into first place for the first time in the season and improve to 10-4. Going into their Week 16 matchup at home against Indianapolis, Dallas was in a position to clinch their first division title since 2009 by defeating the Colts thanks to the Eagles losing that week to the Redskins. They would not disappoint as they blew out the Colts 42-7 to become the 2014 NFC East Champions, eliminating the Eagles from the playoffs. Dallas would end the regular season with a 12-4 record and an 8-0 away record when they won on the road against Washington 44-17. They would also finish December 4-0 which was huge for the Cowboys since they had struggled in the recent years in the month of December.
Question: How many more points did the Cowboys score against the Colts than they did their first game against Philadelphia?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
32<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Dallas played into their traditional Thanksgiving home game, this time against division rival Philadelphia. Both teams were vying for first place in the division with identical 8-3 records. The Eagles got off to a fast start and the Cowboys were unable to catch up, losing 33-10. They would rebound the next week where on the road Thursday night game they defeated Chicago 41-28 for their 9th win of the year to clinch their first winning season since 2009. This was the first time that Dallas played on back to back Thursdays. Week 15 was a rematch against 1st place Philadelphia. This time it was the Cowboys who got off to a fast start going up 21-0. Then the Eagles put up 24 answered points but Dallas came back to win 38-27 to go into first place for the first time in the season and improve to 10-4. Going into their Week 16 matchup at home against Indianapolis, Dallas was in a position to clinch their first division title since 2009 by defeating the Colts thanks to the Eagles losing that week to the Redskins. They would not disappoint as they blew out the Colts 42-7 to become the 2014 NFC East Champions, eliminating the Eagles from the playoffs. Dallas would end the regular season with a 12-4 record and an 8-0 away record when they won on the road against Washington 44-17. They would also finish December 4-0 which was huge for the Cowboys since they had struggled in the recent years in the month of December.
Question: How many more points did the Cowboys score against Washington than they did their first game against Philadelphia? | 34 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Dallas played into their traditional Thanksgiving home game, this time against division rival Philadelphia. Both teams were vying for first place in the division with identical 8-3 records. The Eagles got off to a fast start and the Cowboys were unable to catch up, losing 33-10. They would rebound the next week where on the road Thursday night game they defeated Chicago 41-28 for their 9th win of the year to clinch their first winning season since 2009. This was the first time that Dallas played on back to back Thursdays. Week 15 was a rematch against 1st place Philadelphia. This time it was the Cowboys who got off to a fast start going up 21-0. Then the Eagles put up 24 answered points but Dallas came back to win 38-27 to go into first place for the first time in the season and improve to 10-4. Going into their Week 16 matchup at home against Indianapolis, Dallas was in a position to clinch their first division title since 2009 by defeating the Colts thanks to the Eagles losing that week to the Redskins. They would not disappoint as they blew out the Colts 42-7 to become the 2014 NFC East Champions, eliminating the Eagles from the playoffs. Dallas would end the regular season with a 12-4 record and an 8-0 away record when they won on the road against Washington 44-17. They would also finish December 4-0 which was huge for the Cowboys since they had struggled in the recent years in the month of December.
Question: How many more points did the Cowboys score against Washington than they did their first game against Philadelphia?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
34<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Dallas played into their traditional Thanksgiving home game, this time against division rival Philadelphia. Both teams were vying for first place in the division with identical 8-3 records. The Eagles got off to a fast start and the Cowboys were unable to catch up, losing 33-10. They would rebound the next week where on the road Thursday night game they defeated Chicago 41-28 for their 9th win of the year to clinch their first winning season since 2009. This was the first time that Dallas played on back to back Thursdays. Week 15 was a rematch against 1st place Philadelphia. This time it was the Cowboys who got off to a fast start going up 21-0. Then the Eagles put up 24 answered points but Dallas came back to win 38-27 to go into first place for the first time in the season and improve to 10-4. Going into their Week 16 matchup at home against Indianapolis, Dallas was in a position to clinch their first division title since 2009 by defeating the Colts thanks to the Eagles losing that week to the Redskins. They would not disappoint as they blew out the Colts 42-7 to become the 2014 NFC East Champions, eliminating the Eagles from the playoffs. Dallas would end the regular season with a 12-4 record and an 8-0 away record when they won on the road against Washington 44-17. They would also finish December 4-0 which was huge for the Cowboys since they had struggled in the recent years in the month of December.
Question: How many more points did the Cowboys score against Washington than they did against the Colts? | 2 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Dallas played into their traditional Thanksgiving home game, this time against division rival Philadelphia. Both teams were vying for first place in the division with identical 8-3 records. The Eagles got off to a fast start and the Cowboys were unable to catch up, losing 33-10. They would rebound the next week where on the road Thursday night game they defeated Chicago 41-28 for their 9th win of the year to clinch their first winning season since 2009. This was the first time that Dallas played on back to back Thursdays. Week 15 was a rematch against 1st place Philadelphia. This time it was the Cowboys who got off to a fast start going up 21-0. Then the Eagles put up 24 answered points but Dallas came back to win 38-27 to go into first place for the first time in the season and improve to 10-4. Going into their Week 16 matchup at home against Indianapolis, Dallas was in a position to clinch their first division title since 2009 by defeating the Colts thanks to the Eagles losing that week to the Redskins. They would not disappoint as they blew out the Colts 42-7 to become the 2014 NFC East Champions, eliminating the Eagles from the playoffs. Dallas would end the regular season with a 12-4 record and an 8-0 away record when they won on the road against Washington 44-17. They would also finish December 4-0 which was huge for the Cowboys since they had struggled in the recent years in the month of December.
Question: How many more points did the Cowboys score against Washington than they did against the Colts?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Dallas played into their traditional Thanksgiving home game, this time against division rival Philadelphia. Both teams were vying for first place in the division with identical 8-3 records. The Eagles got off to a fast start and the Cowboys were unable to catch up, losing 33-10. They would rebound the next week where on the road Thursday night game they defeated Chicago 41-28 for their 9th win of the year to clinch their first winning season since 2009. This was the first time that Dallas played on back to back Thursdays. Week 15 was a rematch against 1st place Philadelphia. This time it was the Cowboys who got off to a fast start going up 21-0. Then the Eagles put up 24 answered points but Dallas came back to win 38-27 to go into first place for the first time in the season and improve to 10-4. Going into their Week 16 matchup at home against Indianapolis, Dallas was in a position to clinch their first division title since 2009 by defeating the Colts thanks to the Eagles losing that week to the Redskins. They would not disappoint as they blew out the Colts 42-7 to become the 2014 NFC East Champions, eliminating the Eagles from the playoffs. Dallas would end the regular season with a 12-4 record and an 8-0 away record when they won on the road against Washington 44-17. They would also finish December 4-0 which was huge for the Cowboys since they had struggled in the recent years in the month of December.
Question: How many more points did the Cowboys score against Washington than they did against Chicago? | 3 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Dallas played into their traditional Thanksgiving home game, this time against division rival Philadelphia. Both teams were vying for first place in the division with identical 8-3 records. The Eagles got off to a fast start and the Cowboys were unable to catch up, losing 33-10. They would rebound the next week where on the road Thursday night game they defeated Chicago 41-28 for their 9th win of the year to clinch their first winning season since 2009. This was the first time that Dallas played on back to back Thursdays. Week 15 was a rematch against 1st place Philadelphia. This time it was the Cowboys who got off to a fast start going up 21-0. Then the Eagles put up 24 answered points but Dallas came back to win 38-27 to go into first place for the first time in the season and improve to 10-4. Going into their Week 16 matchup at home against Indianapolis, Dallas was in a position to clinch their first division title since 2009 by defeating the Colts thanks to the Eagles losing that week to the Redskins. They would not disappoint as they blew out the Colts 42-7 to become the 2014 NFC East Champions, eliminating the Eagles from the playoffs. Dallas would end the regular season with a 12-4 record and an 8-0 away record when they won on the road against Washington 44-17. They would also finish December 4-0 which was huge for the Cowboys since they had struggled in the recent years in the month of December.
Question: How many more points did the Cowboys score against Washington than they did against Chicago?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
3<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Dallas played into their traditional Thanksgiving home game, this time against division rival Philadelphia. Both teams were vying for first place in the division with identical 8-3 records. The Eagles got off to a fast start and the Cowboys were unable to catch up, losing 33-10. They would rebound the next week where on the road Thursday night game they defeated Chicago 41-28 for their 9th win of the year to clinch their first winning season since 2009. This was the first time that Dallas played on back to back Thursdays. Week 15 was a rematch against 1st place Philadelphia. This time it was the Cowboys who got off to a fast start going up 21-0. Then the Eagles put up 24 answered points but Dallas came back to win 38-27 to go into first place for the first time in the season and improve to 10-4. Going into their Week 16 matchup at home against Indianapolis, Dallas was in a position to clinch their first division title since 2009 by defeating the Colts thanks to the Eagles losing that week to the Redskins. They would not disappoint as they blew out the Colts 42-7 to become the 2014 NFC East Champions, eliminating the Eagles from the playoffs. Dallas would end the regular season with a 12-4 record and an 8-0 away record when they won on the road against Washington 44-17. They would also finish December 4-0 which was huge for the Cowboys since they had struggled in the recent years in the month of December.
Question: How many more points did the Cowboys score against the Colts than in their second game against Philadelphia? | 4 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Dallas played into their traditional Thanksgiving home game, this time against division rival Philadelphia. Both teams were vying for first place in the division with identical 8-3 records. The Eagles got off to a fast start and the Cowboys were unable to catch up, losing 33-10. They would rebound the next week where on the road Thursday night game they defeated Chicago 41-28 for their 9th win of the year to clinch their first winning season since 2009. This was the first time that Dallas played on back to back Thursdays. Week 15 was a rematch against 1st place Philadelphia. This time it was the Cowboys who got off to a fast start going up 21-0. Then the Eagles put up 24 answered points but Dallas came back to win 38-27 to go into first place for the first time in the season and improve to 10-4. Going into their Week 16 matchup at home against Indianapolis, Dallas was in a position to clinch their first division title since 2009 by defeating the Colts thanks to the Eagles losing that week to the Redskins. They would not disappoint as they blew out the Colts 42-7 to become the 2014 NFC East Champions, eliminating the Eagles from the playoffs. Dallas would end the regular season with a 12-4 record and an 8-0 away record when they won on the road against Washington 44-17. They would also finish December 4-0 which was huge for the Cowboys since they had struggled in the recent years in the month of December.
Question: How many more points did the Cowboys score against the Colts than in their second game against Philadelphia?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
4<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Dallas played into their traditional Thanksgiving home game, this time against division rival Philadelphia. Both teams were vying for first place in the division with identical 8-3 records. The Eagles got off to a fast start and the Cowboys were unable to catch up, losing 33-10. They would rebound the next week where on the road Thursday night game they defeated Chicago 41-28 for their 9th win of the year to clinch their first winning season since 2009. This was the first time that Dallas played on back to back Thursdays. Week 15 was a rematch against 1st place Philadelphia. This time it was the Cowboys who got off to a fast start going up 21-0. Then the Eagles put up 24 answered points but Dallas came back to win 38-27 to go into first place for the first time in the season and improve to 10-4. Going into their Week 16 matchup at home against Indianapolis, Dallas was in a position to clinch their first division title since 2009 by defeating the Colts thanks to the Eagles losing that week to the Redskins. They would not disappoint as they blew out the Colts 42-7 to become the 2014 NFC East Champions, eliminating the Eagles from the playoffs. Dallas would end the regular season with a 12-4 record and an 8-0 away record when they won on the road against Washington 44-17. They would also finish December 4-0 which was huge for the Cowboys since they had struggled in the recent years in the month of December.
Question: How many more points did the Cowboys score against Washington than in their second game against Philadelphia? | 6 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Dallas played into their traditional Thanksgiving home game, this time against division rival Philadelphia. Both teams were vying for first place in the division with identical 8-3 records. The Eagles got off to a fast start and the Cowboys were unable to catch up, losing 33-10. They would rebound the next week where on the road Thursday night game they defeated Chicago 41-28 for their 9th win of the year to clinch their first winning season since 2009. This was the first time that Dallas played on back to back Thursdays. Week 15 was a rematch against 1st place Philadelphia. This time it was the Cowboys who got off to a fast start going up 21-0. Then the Eagles put up 24 answered points but Dallas came back to win 38-27 to go into first place for the first time in the season and improve to 10-4. Going into their Week 16 matchup at home against Indianapolis, Dallas was in a position to clinch their first division title since 2009 by defeating the Colts thanks to the Eagles losing that week to the Redskins. They would not disappoint as they blew out the Colts 42-7 to become the 2014 NFC East Champions, eliminating the Eagles from the playoffs. Dallas would end the regular season with a 12-4 record and an 8-0 away record when they won on the road against Washington 44-17. They would also finish December 4-0 which was huge for the Cowboys since they had struggled in the recent years in the month of December.
Question: How many more points did the Cowboys score against Washington than in their second game against Philadelphia?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
6<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Dallas played into their traditional Thanksgiving home game, this time against division rival Philadelphia. Both teams were vying for first place in the division with identical 8-3 records. The Eagles got off to a fast start and the Cowboys were unable to catch up, losing 33-10. They would rebound the next week where on the road Thursday night game they defeated Chicago 41-28 for their 9th win of the year to clinch their first winning season since 2009. This was the first time that Dallas played on back to back Thursdays. Week 15 was a rematch against 1st place Philadelphia. This time it was the Cowboys who got off to a fast start going up 21-0. Then the Eagles put up 24 answered points but Dallas came back to win 38-27 to go into first place for the first time in the season and improve to 10-4. Going into their Week 16 matchup at home against Indianapolis, Dallas was in a position to clinch their first division title since 2009 by defeating the Colts thanks to the Eagles losing that week to the Redskins. They would not disappoint as they blew out the Colts 42-7 to become the 2014 NFC East Champions, eliminating the Eagles from the playoffs. Dallas would end the regular season with a 12-4 record and an 8-0 away record when they won on the road against Washington 44-17. They would also finish December 4-0 which was huge for the Cowboys since they had struggled in the recent years in the month of December.
Question: How many more points did the Cowboys score against Chicago than in their second game against Philadelphia? | 3 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Dallas played into their traditional Thanksgiving home game, this time against division rival Philadelphia. Both teams were vying for first place in the division with identical 8-3 records. The Eagles got off to a fast start and the Cowboys were unable to catch up, losing 33-10. They would rebound the next week where on the road Thursday night game they defeated Chicago 41-28 for their 9th win of the year to clinch their first winning season since 2009. This was the first time that Dallas played on back to back Thursdays. Week 15 was a rematch against 1st place Philadelphia. This time it was the Cowboys who got off to a fast start going up 21-0. Then the Eagles put up 24 answered points but Dallas came back to win 38-27 to go into first place for the first time in the season and improve to 10-4. Going into their Week 16 matchup at home against Indianapolis, Dallas was in a position to clinch their first division title since 2009 by defeating the Colts thanks to the Eagles losing that week to the Redskins. They would not disappoint as they blew out the Colts 42-7 to become the 2014 NFC East Champions, eliminating the Eagles from the playoffs. Dallas would end the regular season with a 12-4 record and an 8-0 away record when they won on the road against Washington 44-17. They would also finish December 4-0 which was huge for the Cowboys since they had struggled in the recent years in the month of December.
Question: How many more points did the Cowboys score against Chicago than in their second game against Philadelphia?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
3<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Dallas played into their traditional Thanksgiving home game, this time against division rival Philadelphia. Both teams were vying for first place in the division with identical 8-3 records. The Eagles got off to a fast start and the Cowboys were unable to catch up, losing 33-10. They would rebound the next week where on the road Thursday night game they defeated Chicago 41-28 for their 9th win of the year to clinch their first winning season since 2009. This was the first time that Dallas played on back to back Thursdays. Week 15 was a rematch against 1st place Philadelphia. This time it was the Cowboys who got off to a fast start going up 21-0. Then the Eagles put up 24 answered points but Dallas came back to win 38-27 to go into first place for the first time in the season and improve to 10-4. Going into their Week 16 matchup at home against Indianapolis, Dallas was in a position to clinch their first division title since 2009 by defeating the Colts thanks to the Eagles losing that week to the Redskins. They would not disappoint as they blew out the Colts 42-7 to become the 2014 NFC East Champions, eliminating the Eagles from the playoffs. Dallas would end the regular season with a 12-4 record and an 8-0 away record when they won on the road against Washington 44-17. They would also finish December 4-0 which was huge for the Cowboys since they had struggled in the recent years in the month of December.
Question: What team played a game against Dallas on Thanksgiving? | Eagles | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Dallas played into their traditional Thanksgiving home game, this time against division rival Philadelphia. Both teams were vying for first place in the division with identical 8-3 records. The Eagles got off to a fast start and the Cowboys were unable to catch up, losing 33-10. They would rebound the next week where on the road Thursday night game they defeated Chicago 41-28 for their 9th win of the year to clinch their first winning season since 2009. This was the first time that Dallas played on back to back Thursdays. Week 15 was a rematch against 1st place Philadelphia. This time it was the Cowboys who got off to a fast start going up 21-0. Then the Eagles put up 24 answered points but Dallas came back to win 38-27 to go into first place for the first time in the season and improve to 10-4. Going into their Week 16 matchup at home against Indianapolis, Dallas was in a position to clinch their first division title since 2009 by defeating the Colts thanks to the Eagles losing that week to the Redskins. They would not disappoint as they blew out the Colts 42-7 to become the 2014 NFC East Champions, eliminating the Eagles from the playoffs. Dallas would end the regular season with a 12-4 record and an 8-0 away record when they won on the road against Washington 44-17. They would also finish December 4-0 which was huge for the Cowboys since they had struggled in the recent years in the month of December.
Question: What team played a game against Dallas on Thanksgiving?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Eagles<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Dallas played into their traditional Thanksgiving home game, this time against division rival Philadelphia. Both teams were vying for first place in the division with identical 8-3 records. The Eagles got off to a fast start and the Cowboys were unable to catch up, losing 33-10. They would rebound the next week where on the road Thursday night game they defeated Chicago 41-28 for their 9th win of the year to clinch their first winning season since 2009. This was the first time that Dallas played on back to back Thursdays. Week 15 was a rematch against 1st place Philadelphia. This time it was the Cowboys who got off to a fast start going up 21-0. Then the Eagles put up 24 answered points but Dallas came back to win 38-27 to go into first place for the first time in the season and improve to 10-4. Going into their Week 16 matchup at home against Indianapolis, Dallas was in a position to clinch their first division title since 2009 by defeating the Colts thanks to the Eagles losing that week to the Redskins. They would not disappoint as they blew out the Colts 42-7 to become the 2014 NFC East Champions, eliminating the Eagles from the playoffs. Dallas would end the regular season with a 12-4 record and an 8-0 away record when they won on the road against Washington 44-17. They would also finish December 4-0 which was huge for the Cowboys since they had struggled in the recent years in the month of December.
Question: How many points did the Cowboys lose their Thanksgiving game by? | 23 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Dallas played into their traditional Thanksgiving home game, this time against division rival Philadelphia. Both teams were vying for first place in the division with identical 8-3 records. The Eagles got off to a fast start and the Cowboys were unable to catch up, losing 33-10. They would rebound the next week where on the road Thursday night game they defeated Chicago 41-28 for their 9th win of the year to clinch their first winning season since 2009. This was the first time that Dallas played on back to back Thursdays. Week 15 was a rematch against 1st place Philadelphia. This time it was the Cowboys who got off to a fast start going up 21-0. Then the Eagles put up 24 answered points but Dallas came back to win 38-27 to go into first place for the first time in the season and improve to 10-4. Going into their Week 16 matchup at home against Indianapolis, Dallas was in a position to clinch their first division title since 2009 by defeating the Colts thanks to the Eagles losing that week to the Redskins. They would not disappoint as they blew out the Colts 42-7 to become the 2014 NFC East Champions, eliminating the Eagles from the playoffs. Dallas would end the regular season with a 12-4 record and an 8-0 away record when they won on the road against Washington 44-17. They would also finish December 4-0 which was huge for the Cowboys since they had struggled in the recent years in the month of December.
Question: How many points did the Cowboys lose their Thanksgiving game by?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
23<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Dallas played into their traditional Thanksgiving home game, this time against division rival Philadelphia. Both teams were vying for first place in the division with identical 8-3 records. The Eagles got off to a fast start and the Cowboys were unable to catch up, losing 33-10. They would rebound the next week where on the road Thursday night game they defeated Chicago 41-28 for their 9th win of the year to clinch their first winning season since 2009. This was the first time that Dallas played on back to back Thursdays. Week 15 was a rematch against 1st place Philadelphia. This time it was the Cowboys who got off to a fast start going up 21-0. Then the Eagles put up 24 answered points but Dallas came back to win 38-27 to go into first place for the first time in the season and improve to 10-4. Going into their Week 16 matchup at home against Indianapolis, Dallas was in a position to clinch their first division title since 2009 by defeating the Colts thanks to the Eagles losing that week to the Redskins. They would not disappoint as they blew out the Colts 42-7 to become the 2014 NFC East Champions, eliminating the Eagles from the playoffs. Dallas would end the regular season with a 12-4 record and an 8-0 away record when they won on the road against Washington 44-17. They would also finish December 4-0 which was huge for the Cowboys since they had struggled in the recent years in the month of December.
Question: How many points did Dallas win their rematch game in Week 15 against Philadelphia? | 11 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Dallas played into their traditional Thanksgiving home game, this time against division rival Philadelphia. Both teams were vying for first place in the division with identical 8-3 records. The Eagles got off to a fast start and the Cowboys were unable to catch up, losing 33-10. They would rebound the next week where on the road Thursday night game they defeated Chicago 41-28 for their 9th win of the year to clinch their first winning season since 2009. This was the first time that Dallas played on back to back Thursdays. Week 15 was a rematch against 1st place Philadelphia. This time it was the Cowboys who got off to a fast start going up 21-0. Then the Eagles put up 24 answered points but Dallas came back to win 38-27 to go into first place for the first time in the season and improve to 10-4. Going into their Week 16 matchup at home against Indianapolis, Dallas was in a position to clinch their first division title since 2009 by defeating the Colts thanks to the Eagles losing that week to the Redskins. They would not disappoint as they blew out the Colts 42-7 to become the 2014 NFC East Champions, eliminating the Eagles from the playoffs. Dallas would end the regular season with a 12-4 record and an 8-0 away record when they won on the road against Washington 44-17. They would also finish December 4-0 which was huge for the Cowboys since they had struggled in the recent years in the month of December.
Question: How many points did Dallas win their rematch game in Week 15 against Philadelphia?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
11<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Dallas played into their traditional Thanksgiving home game, this time against division rival Philadelphia. Both teams were vying for first place in the division with identical 8-3 records. The Eagles got off to a fast start and the Cowboys were unable to catch up, losing 33-10. They would rebound the next week where on the road Thursday night game they defeated Chicago 41-28 for their 9th win of the year to clinch their first winning season since 2009. This was the first time that Dallas played on back to back Thursdays. Week 15 was a rematch against 1st place Philadelphia. This time it was the Cowboys who got off to a fast start going up 21-0. Then the Eagles put up 24 answered points but Dallas came back to win 38-27 to go into first place for the first time in the season and improve to 10-4. Going into their Week 16 matchup at home against Indianapolis, Dallas was in a position to clinch their first division title since 2009 by defeating the Colts thanks to the Eagles losing that week to the Redskins. They would not disappoint as they blew out the Colts 42-7 to become the 2014 NFC East Champions, eliminating the Eagles from the playoffs. Dallas would end the regular season with a 12-4 record and an 8-0 away record when they won on the road against Washington 44-17. They would also finish December 4-0 which was huge for the Cowboys since they had struggled in the recent years in the month of December.
Question: How many points did Dallas win against the Colts by to become the 2014 NFC East Champions? | 35 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Dallas played into their traditional Thanksgiving home game, this time against division rival Philadelphia. Both teams were vying for first place in the division with identical 8-3 records. The Eagles got off to a fast start and the Cowboys were unable to catch up, losing 33-10. They would rebound the next week where on the road Thursday night game they defeated Chicago 41-28 for their 9th win of the year to clinch their first winning season since 2009. This was the first time that Dallas played on back to back Thursdays. Week 15 was a rematch against 1st place Philadelphia. This time it was the Cowboys who got off to a fast start going up 21-0. Then the Eagles put up 24 answered points but Dallas came back to win 38-27 to go into first place for the first time in the season and improve to 10-4. Going into their Week 16 matchup at home against Indianapolis, Dallas was in a position to clinch their first division title since 2009 by defeating the Colts thanks to the Eagles losing that week to the Redskins. They would not disappoint as they blew out the Colts 42-7 to become the 2014 NFC East Champions, eliminating the Eagles from the playoffs. Dallas would end the regular season with a 12-4 record and an 8-0 away record when they won on the road against Washington 44-17. They would also finish December 4-0 which was huge for the Cowboys since they had struggled in the recent years in the month of December.
Question: How many points did Dallas win against the Colts by to become the 2014 NFC East Champions?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
35<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Dallas played into their traditional Thanksgiving home game, this time against division rival Philadelphia. Both teams were vying for first place in the division with identical 8-3 records. The Eagles got off to a fast start and the Cowboys were unable to catch up, losing 33-10. They would rebound the next week where on the road Thursday night game they defeated Chicago 41-28 for their 9th win of the year to clinch their first winning season since 2009. This was the first time that Dallas played on back to back Thursdays. Week 15 was a rematch against 1st place Philadelphia. This time it was the Cowboys who got off to a fast start going up 21-0. Then the Eagles put up 24 answered points but Dallas came back to win 38-27 to go into first place for the first time in the season and improve to 10-4. Going into their Week 16 matchup at home against Indianapolis, Dallas was in a position to clinch their first division title since 2009 by defeating the Colts thanks to the Eagles losing that week to the Redskins. They would not disappoint as they blew out the Colts 42-7 to become the 2014 NFC East Champions, eliminating the Eagles from the playoffs. Dallas would end the regular season with a 12-4 record and an 8-0 away record when they won on the road against Washington 44-17. They would also finish December 4-0 which was huge for the Cowboys since they had struggled in the recent years in the month of December.
Question: How many points did Washington lose against Dallas by? | 27 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Dallas played into their traditional Thanksgiving home game, this time against division rival Philadelphia. Both teams were vying for first place in the division with identical 8-3 records. The Eagles got off to a fast start and the Cowboys were unable to catch up, losing 33-10. They would rebound the next week where on the road Thursday night game they defeated Chicago 41-28 for their 9th win of the year to clinch their first winning season since 2009. This was the first time that Dallas played on back to back Thursdays. Week 15 was a rematch against 1st place Philadelphia. This time it was the Cowboys who got off to a fast start going up 21-0. Then the Eagles put up 24 answered points but Dallas came back to win 38-27 to go into first place for the first time in the season and improve to 10-4. Going into their Week 16 matchup at home against Indianapolis, Dallas was in a position to clinch their first division title since 2009 by defeating the Colts thanks to the Eagles losing that week to the Redskins. They would not disappoint as they blew out the Colts 42-7 to become the 2014 NFC East Champions, eliminating the Eagles from the playoffs. Dallas would end the regular season with a 12-4 record and an 8-0 away record when they won on the road against Washington 44-17. They would also finish December 4-0 which was huge for the Cowboys since they had struggled in the recent years in the month of December.
Question: How many points did Washington lose against Dallas by?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
27<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: With the victory over their hated rival in Western Pennsylvania, the Bengals increased their regular season record to 9-6 and finished 6-2 in road games, clinching a winning season and playoff spot for the third time in the last four seasons and also clinching consecutive winning seasons and playoff berths for the first time since 1981 and 1982 seasons. By improving to 5-7 at Heinz Field, Cincinnati defeated the Steelers for the first time since 2009 when they won the AFC North after going 6-0 against their three rivals. This was the first time since 1988 when the Bengals would have a successful two-week road trip in Pennsylvania. Due to the Ravens clinching the AFC North following a victory over the Giants a few hours later, the Bengals were assigned to one of the two wild card seeds along with the Indianapolis Colts (10-5). With the Colts' victory over the Chiefs that day, the Bengals were given the 6th seed since the Colts had a better record than them against common opponents (4-1 vs. 3-2).
Question: How many more games had Cincinnati lost than won at Heinz Field? | 2 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: With the victory over their hated rival in Western Pennsylvania, the Bengals increased their regular season record to 9-6 and finished 6-2 in road games, clinching a winning season and playoff spot for the third time in the last four seasons and also clinching consecutive winning seasons and playoff berths for the first time since 1981 and 1982 seasons. By improving to 5-7 at Heinz Field, Cincinnati defeated the Steelers for the first time since 2009 when they won the AFC North after going 6-0 against their three rivals. This was the first time since 1988 when the Bengals would have a successful two-week road trip in Pennsylvania. Due to the Ravens clinching the AFC North following a victory over the Giants a few hours later, the Bengals were assigned to one of the two wild card seeds along with the Indianapolis Colts (10-5). With the Colts' victory over the Chiefs that day, the Bengals were given the 6th seed since the Colts had a better record than them against common opponents (4-1 vs. 3-2).
Question: How many more games had Cincinnati lost than won at Heinz Field?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: With the victory over their hated rival in Western Pennsylvania, the Bengals increased their regular season record to 9-6 and finished 6-2 in road games, clinching a winning season and playoff spot for the third time in the last four seasons and also clinching consecutive winning seasons and playoff berths for the first time since 1981 and 1982 seasons. By improving to 5-7 at Heinz Field, Cincinnati defeated the Steelers for the first time since 2009 when they won the AFC North after going 6-0 against their three rivals. This was the first time since 1988 when the Bengals would have a successful two-week road trip in Pennsylvania. Due to the Ravens clinching the AFC North following a victory over the Giants a few hours later, the Bengals were assigned to one of the two wild card seeds along with the Indianapolis Colts (10-5). With the Colts' victory over the Chiefs that day, the Bengals were given the 6th seed since the Colts had a better record than them against common opponents (4-1 vs. 3-2).
Question: How many more games had the Bengals won than lost in road games? | 4 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: With the victory over their hated rival in Western Pennsylvania, the Bengals increased their regular season record to 9-6 and finished 6-2 in road games, clinching a winning season and playoff spot for the third time in the last four seasons and also clinching consecutive winning seasons and playoff berths for the first time since 1981 and 1982 seasons. By improving to 5-7 at Heinz Field, Cincinnati defeated the Steelers for the first time since 2009 when they won the AFC North after going 6-0 against their three rivals. This was the first time since 1988 when the Bengals would have a successful two-week road trip in Pennsylvania. Due to the Ravens clinching the AFC North following a victory over the Giants a few hours later, the Bengals were assigned to one of the two wild card seeds along with the Indianapolis Colts (10-5). With the Colts' victory over the Chiefs that day, the Bengals were given the 6th seed since the Colts had a better record than them against common opponents (4-1 vs. 3-2).
Question: How many more games had the Bengals won than lost in road games?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
4<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The average number of residents per living room was 0.59 which is about equal to the cantonal average of 0.58 per room. In this case, a room is defined as space of a housing unit of at least as normal bedrooms, dining rooms, living rooms, kitchens and habitable cellars and attics. About 10.5% of the total households were owner occupied, or in other words did not pay rent (though they may have a Mortgage loan or a rent-to-own agreement). , there were 86,371 private households in the municipality, and an average of 1.8 persons per household. There were 44,469 households that consist of only one person and 2,842 households with five or more people. Out of a total of 88,646 households that answered this question, 50.2% were households made up of just one person and there were 451 adults who lived with their parents. Of the rest of the households, there are 20,472 married couples without children, 14,554 married couples with children There were 4,318 single parents with a child or children. There were 2,107 households that were made up of unrelated people and 2,275 households that were made up of some sort of institution or another collective housing.
Question: How many more households consisted of only one person than households with five or more people? | 41627 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The average number of residents per living room was 0.59 which is about equal to the cantonal average of 0.58 per room. In this case, a room is defined as space of a housing unit of at least as normal bedrooms, dining rooms, living rooms, kitchens and habitable cellars and attics. About 10.5% of the total households were owner occupied, or in other words did not pay rent (though they may have a Mortgage loan or a rent-to-own agreement). , there were 86,371 private households in the municipality, and an average of 1.8 persons per household. There were 44,469 households that consist of only one person and 2,842 households with five or more people. Out of a total of 88,646 households that answered this question, 50.2% were households made up of just one person and there were 451 adults who lived with their parents. Of the rest of the households, there are 20,472 married couples without children, 14,554 married couples with children There were 4,318 single parents with a child or children. There were 2,107 households that were made up of unrelated people and 2,275 households that were made up of some sort of institution or another collective housing.
Question: How many more households consisted of only one person than households with five or more people?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
41627<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The average number of residents per living room was 0.59 which is about equal to the cantonal average of 0.58 per room. In this case, a room is defined as space of a housing unit of at least as normal bedrooms, dining rooms, living rooms, kitchens and habitable cellars and attics. About 10.5% of the total households were owner occupied, or in other words did not pay rent (though they may have a Mortgage loan or a rent-to-own agreement). , there were 86,371 private households in the municipality, and an average of 1.8 persons per household. There were 44,469 households that consist of only one person and 2,842 households with five or more people. Out of a total of 88,646 households that answered this question, 50.2% were households made up of just one person and there were 451 adults who lived with their parents. Of the rest of the households, there are 20,472 married couples without children, 14,554 married couples with children There were 4,318 single parents with a child or children. There were 2,107 households that were made up of unrelated people and 2,275 households that were made up of some sort of institution or another collective housing.
Question: How many more households were there with couples married without children than households married with children? | 5918 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The average number of residents per living room was 0.59 which is about equal to the cantonal average of 0.58 per room. In this case, a room is defined as space of a housing unit of at least as normal bedrooms, dining rooms, living rooms, kitchens and habitable cellars and attics. About 10.5% of the total households were owner occupied, or in other words did not pay rent (though they may have a Mortgage loan or a rent-to-own agreement). , there were 86,371 private households in the municipality, and an average of 1.8 persons per household. There were 44,469 households that consist of only one person and 2,842 households with five or more people. Out of a total of 88,646 households that answered this question, 50.2% were households made up of just one person and there were 451 adults who lived with their parents. Of the rest of the households, there are 20,472 married couples without children, 14,554 married couples with children There were 4,318 single parents with a child or children. There were 2,107 households that were made up of unrelated people and 2,275 households that were made up of some sort of institution or another collective housing.
Question: How many more households were there with couples married without children than households married with children?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
5918<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The average number of residents per living room was 0.59 which is about equal to the cantonal average of 0.58 per room. In this case, a room is defined as space of a housing unit of at least as normal bedrooms, dining rooms, living rooms, kitchens and habitable cellars and attics. About 10.5% of the total households were owner occupied, or in other words did not pay rent (though they may have a Mortgage loan or a rent-to-own agreement). , there were 86,371 private households in the municipality, and an average of 1.8 persons per household. There were 44,469 households that consist of only one person and 2,842 households with five or more people. Out of a total of 88,646 households that answered this question, 50.2% were households made up of just one person and there were 451 adults who lived with their parents. Of the rest of the households, there are 20,472 married couples without children, 14,554 married couples with children There were 4,318 single parents with a child or children. There were 2,107 households that were made up of unrelated people and 2,275 households that were made up of some sort of institution or another collective housing.
Question: How many more households were made up of collective-type housing than households made up of unrelated people? | 168 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The average number of residents per living room was 0.59 which is about equal to the cantonal average of 0.58 per room. In this case, a room is defined as space of a housing unit of at least as normal bedrooms, dining rooms, living rooms, kitchens and habitable cellars and attics. About 10.5% of the total households were owner occupied, or in other words did not pay rent (though they may have a Mortgage loan or a rent-to-own agreement). , there were 86,371 private households in the municipality, and an average of 1.8 persons per household. There were 44,469 households that consist of only one person and 2,842 households with five or more people. Out of a total of 88,646 households that answered this question, 50.2% were households made up of just one person and there were 451 adults who lived with their parents. Of the rest of the households, there are 20,472 married couples without children, 14,554 married couples with children There were 4,318 single parents with a child or children. There were 2,107 households that were made up of unrelated people and 2,275 households that were made up of some sort of institution or another collective housing.
Question: How many more households were made up of collective-type housing than households made up of unrelated people?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
168<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The average number of residents per living room was 0.59 which is about equal to the cantonal average of 0.58 per room. In this case, a room is defined as space of a housing unit of at least as normal bedrooms, dining rooms, living rooms, kitchens and habitable cellars and attics. About 10.5% of the total households were owner occupied, or in other words did not pay rent (though they may have a Mortgage loan or a rent-to-own agreement). , there were 86,371 private households in the municipality, and an average of 1.8 persons per household. There were 44,469 households that consist of only one person and 2,842 households with five or more people. Out of a total of 88,646 households that answered this question, 50.2% were households made up of just one person and there were 451 adults who lived with their parents. Of the rest of the households, there are 20,472 married couples without children, 14,554 married couples with children There were 4,318 single parents with a child or children. There were 2,107 households that were made up of unrelated people and 2,275 households that were made up of some sort of institution or another collective housing.
Question: How many of the 86371 households did not consist of only one person? | 41902 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The average number of residents per living room was 0.59 which is about equal to the cantonal average of 0.58 per room. In this case, a room is defined as space of a housing unit of at least as normal bedrooms, dining rooms, living rooms, kitchens and habitable cellars and attics. About 10.5% of the total households were owner occupied, or in other words did not pay rent (though they may have a Mortgage loan or a rent-to-own agreement). , there were 86,371 private households in the municipality, and an average of 1.8 persons per household. There were 44,469 households that consist of only one person and 2,842 households with five or more people. Out of a total of 88,646 households that answered this question, 50.2% were households made up of just one person and there were 451 adults who lived with their parents. Of the rest of the households, there are 20,472 married couples without children, 14,554 married couples with children There were 4,318 single parents with a child or children. There were 2,107 households that were made up of unrelated people and 2,275 households that were made up of some sort of institution or another collective housing.
Question: How many of the 86371 households did not consist of only one person?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
41902<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The average number of residents per living room was 0.59 which is about equal to the cantonal average of 0.58 per room. In this case, a room is defined as space of a housing unit of at least as normal bedrooms, dining rooms, living rooms, kitchens and habitable cellars and attics. About 10.5% of the total households were owner occupied, or in other words did not pay rent (though they may have a Mortgage loan or a rent-to-own agreement). , there were 86,371 private households in the municipality, and an average of 1.8 persons per household. There were 44,469 households that consist of only one person and 2,842 households with five or more people. Out of a total of 88,646 households that answered this question, 50.2% were households made up of just one person and there were 451 adults who lived with their parents. Of the rest of the households, there are 20,472 married couples without children, 14,554 married couples with children There were 4,318 single parents with a child or children. There were 2,107 households that were made up of unrelated people and 2,275 households that were made up of some sort of institution or another collective housing.
Question: How many percent of households were not owner occupied? | 89.5 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The average number of residents per living room was 0.59 which is about equal to the cantonal average of 0.58 per room. In this case, a room is defined as space of a housing unit of at least as normal bedrooms, dining rooms, living rooms, kitchens and habitable cellars and attics. About 10.5% of the total households were owner occupied, or in other words did not pay rent (though they may have a Mortgage loan or a rent-to-own agreement). , there were 86,371 private households in the municipality, and an average of 1.8 persons per household. There were 44,469 households that consist of only one person and 2,842 households with five or more people. Out of a total of 88,646 households that answered this question, 50.2% were households made up of just one person and there were 451 adults who lived with their parents. Of the rest of the households, there are 20,472 married couples without children, 14,554 married couples with children There were 4,318 single parents with a child or children. There were 2,107 households that were made up of unrelated people and 2,275 households that were made up of some sort of institution or another collective housing.
Question: How many percent of households were not owner occupied?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
89.5<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The average number of residents per living room was 0.59 which is about equal to the cantonal average of 0.58 per room. In this case, a room is defined as space of a housing unit of at least as normal bedrooms, dining rooms, living rooms, kitchens and habitable cellars and attics. About 10.5% of the total households were owner occupied, or in other words did not pay rent (though they may have a Mortgage loan or a rent-to-own agreement). , there were 86,371 private households in the municipality, and an average of 1.8 persons per household. There were 44,469 households that consist of only one person and 2,842 households with five or more people. Out of a total of 88,646 households that answered this question, 50.2% were households made up of just one person and there were 451 adults who lived with their parents. Of the rest of the households, there are 20,472 married couples without children, 14,554 married couples with children There were 4,318 single parents with a child or children. There were 2,107 households that were made up of unrelated people and 2,275 households that were made up of some sort of institution or another collective housing.
Question: How many percent of households were not made up of just one person? | 49.8 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The average number of residents per living room was 0.59 which is about equal to the cantonal average of 0.58 per room. In this case, a room is defined as space of a housing unit of at least as normal bedrooms, dining rooms, living rooms, kitchens and habitable cellars and attics. About 10.5% of the total households were owner occupied, or in other words did not pay rent (though they may have a Mortgage loan or a rent-to-own agreement). , there were 86,371 private households in the municipality, and an average of 1.8 persons per household. There were 44,469 households that consist of only one person and 2,842 households with five or more people. Out of a total of 88,646 households that answered this question, 50.2% were households made up of just one person and there were 451 adults who lived with their parents. Of the rest of the households, there are 20,472 married couples without children, 14,554 married couples with children There were 4,318 single parents with a child or children. There were 2,107 households that were made up of unrelated people and 2,275 households that were made up of some sort of institution or another collective housing.
Question: How many percent of households were not made up of just one person?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
49.8<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In the first four years of the Chávez presidency, the economy grew at first (1999–2001), then contracted from 2001–2003 to GDP levels similar to 1997. At first, the economic decline was due to low oil prices, but it was fueled by the turmoil of the 2002 Venezuelan coup détat attempt and the Venezuelan general strike of 2002–03. Other factors of the decline were an exodus of capital from the country and a reluctance of foreign investors. GDP was 50.0 trillion bolivares in 1998. At the bottom of the recession in 2003, it was 42.4 trillion bolivares (in constant 1998 bolivares). However, GDP rebounded 50.1 trillion bolivares with a calmer political situation in 2004 and rose to 66.1 trillion bolivares in 2007 (both in constant 1998 bolivares).
Question: Was the GDP larger in 1998 or in 2003? | 1998 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In the first four years of the Chávez presidency, the economy grew at first (1999–2001), then contracted from 2001–2003 to GDP levels similar to 1997. At first, the economic decline was due to low oil prices, but it was fueled by the turmoil of the 2002 Venezuelan coup détat attempt and the Venezuelan general strike of 2002–03. Other factors of the decline were an exodus of capital from the country and a reluctance of foreign investors. GDP was 50.0 trillion bolivares in 1998. At the bottom of the recession in 2003, it was 42.4 trillion bolivares (in constant 1998 bolivares). However, GDP rebounded 50.1 trillion bolivares with a calmer political situation in 2004 and rose to 66.1 trillion bolivares in 2007 (both in constant 1998 bolivares).
Question: Was the GDP larger in 1998 or in 2003?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
1998<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In the first four years of the Chávez presidency, the economy grew at first (1999–2001), then contracted from 2001–2003 to GDP levels similar to 1997. At first, the economic decline was due to low oil prices, but it was fueled by the turmoil of the 2002 Venezuelan coup détat attempt and the Venezuelan general strike of 2002–03. Other factors of the decline were an exodus of capital from the country and a reluctance of foreign investors. GDP was 50.0 trillion bolivares in 1998. At the bottom of the recession in 2003, it was 42.4 trillion bolivares (in constant 1998 bolivares). However, GDP rebounded 50.1 trillion bolivares with a calmer political situation in 2004 and rose to 66.1 trillion bolivares in 2007 (both in constant 1998 bolivares).
Question: Was the GDP smaller in 2004 or in 2007? | 2004 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In the first four years of the Chávez presidency, the economy grew at first (1999–2001), then contracted from 2001–2003 to GDP levels similar to 1997. At first, the economic decline was due to low oil prices, but it was fueled by the turmoil of the 2002 Venezuelan coup détat attempt and the Venezuelan general strike of 2002–03. Other factors of the decline were an exodus of capital from the country and a reluctance of foreign investors. GDP was 50.0 trillion bolivares in 1998. At the bottom of the recession in 2003, it was 42.4 trillion bolivares (in constant 1998 bolivares). However, GDP rebounded 50.1 trillion bolivares with a calmer political situation in 2004 and rose to 66.1 trillion bolivares in 2007 (both in constant 1998 bolivares).
Question: Was the GDP smaller in 2004 or in 2007?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2004<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The deportation was given the code name Operation Ulusy. In it, a total of 93,139 Kalmyks were uprooted. They were packed into Cattle wagon and dispatched in some 46 trains. One witness recalled that they traveled for two weeks. Many Kalmyks were dirty and unwashed upon arrival; upon exiting, the snow became black from their dirt. The deportation was completed on 31 December. A majority of them (91,919) were deported by the end of the year, though an additional 1,014 people were also evicted in January 1944. Resolution no. 1432 425 of the Soviet of Peoples Commissars, which determined that this ethnic group should be resettled, was adopted on 28 December 1943 and signed by Vyacheslav Molotov, but not made public. The entire operation was guided by the NKVD chief Lavrentiy Beria and his Deputy Commissar Ivan Serov. Other officials who participated in it included Victor Grigorievich Nasedkin, Head of the Gulag and Commissar of the State Security of the 3rd degree, and Dmitri Vasilevich Arkadiev, the Head of the Transport Department of the USSR NKVD. The Kalmyks were sent to various locations in Siberia—by January 1944, 24,352 were sent to the Omsk Oblast, 21,164 to Krasnoyarsk Krai, 20,858 to Altai Krai, and 18,333 to Novosibirsk Oblast. Alternative sources indicate that, beginning in 1944, 6,167 Kalmyk families were in the Altai, 7,525 in the Krasnoyarsk, 5,435 in Novosibirsk and 8,353 in the Omsk Region. 660 families were also located in the Tomsk Region, 648 in the Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic, 522 in Tobolsk, 2,796 in the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug and 1,760 in the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug.
Question: How many Kalmyks were not deported by the end of the year? | 1220 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The deportation was given the code name Operation Ulusy. In it, a total of 93,139 Kalmyks were uprooted. They were packed into Cattle wagon and dispatched in some 46 trains. One witness recalled that they traveled for two weeks. Many Kalmyks were dirty and unwashed upon arrival; upon exiting, the snow became black from their dirt. The deportation was completed on 31 December. A majority of them (91,919) were deported by the end of the year, though an additional 1,014 people were also evicted in January 1944. Resolution no. 1432 425 of the Soviet of Peoples Commissars, which determined that this ethnic group should be resettled, was adopted on 28 December 1943 and signed by Vyacheslav Molotov, but not made public. The entire operation was guided by the NKVD chief Lavrentiy Beria and his Deputy Commissar Ivan Serov. Other officials who participated in it included Victor Grigorievich Nasedkin, Head of the Gulag and Commissar of the State Security of the 3rd degree, and Dmitri Vasilevich Arkadiev, the Head of the Transport Department of the USSR NKVD. The Kalmyks were sent to various locations in Siberia—by January 1944, 24,352 were sent to the Omsk Oblast, 21,164 to Krasnoyarsk Krai, 20,858 to Altai Krai, and 18,333 to Novosibirsk Oblast. Alternative sources indicate that, beginning in 1944, 6,167 Kalmyk families were in the Altai, 7,525 in the Krasnoyarsk, 5,435 in Novosibirsk and 8,353 in the Omsk Region. 660 families were also located in the Tomsk Region, 648 in the Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic, 522 in Tobolsk, 2,796 in the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug and 1,760 in the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug.
Question: How many Kalmyks were not deported by the end of the year?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
1220<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The deportation was given the code name Operation Ulusy. In it, a total of 93,139 Kalmyks were uprooted. They were packed into Cattle wagon and dispatched in some 46 trains. One witness recalled that they traveled for two weeks. Many Kalmyks were dirty and unwashed upon arrival; upon exiting, the snow became black from their dirt. The deportation was completed on 31 December. A majority of them (91,919) were deported by the end of the year, though an additional 1,014 people were also evicted in January 1944. Resolution no. 1432 425 of the Soviet of Peoples Commissars, which determined that this ethnic group should be resettled, was adopted on 28 December 1943 and signed by Vyacheslav Molotov, but not made public. The entire operation was guided by the NKVD chief Lavrentiy Beria and his Deputy Commissar Ivan Serov. Other officials who participated in it included Victor Grigorievich Nasedkin, Head of the Gulag and Commissar of the State Security of the 3rd degree, and Dmitri Vasilevich Arkadiev, the Head of the Transport Department of the USSR NKVD. The Kalmyks were sent to various locations in Siberia—by January 1944, 24,352 were sent to the Omsk Oblast, 21,164 to Krasnoyarsk Krai, 20,858 to Altai Krai, and 18,333 to Novosibirsk Oblast. Alternative sources indicate that, beginning in 1944, 6,167 Kalmyk families were in the Altai, 7,525 in the Krasnoyarsk, 5,435 in Novosibirsk and 8,353 in the Omsk Region. 660 families were also located in the Tomsk Region, 648 in the Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic, 522 in Tobolsk, 2,796 in the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug and 1,760 in the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug.
Question: Which location were more Kalmyks sent to in Siberia by January 1944, Krasnoyarsk Krai or Altai Krai? | Krasnoyarsk Krai | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The deportation was given the code name Operation Ulusy. In it, a total of 93,139 Kalmyks were uprooted. They were packed into Cattle wagon and dispatched in some 46 trains. One witness recalled that they traveled for two weeks. Many Kalmyks were dirty and unwashed upon arrival; upon exiting, the snow became black from their dirt. The deportation was completed on 31 December. A majority of them (91,919) were deported by the end of the year, though an additional 1,014 people were also evicted in January 1944. Resolution no. 1432 425 of the Soviet of Peoples Commissars, which determined that this ethnic group should be resettled, was adopted on 28 December 1943 and signed by Vyacheslav Molotov, but not made public. The entire operation was guided by the NKVD chief Lavrentiy Beria and his Deputy Commissar Ivan Serov. Other officials who participated in it included Victor Grigorievich Nasedkin, Head of the Gulag and Commissar of the State Security of the 3rd degree, and Dmitri Vasilevich Arkadiev, the Head of the Transport Department of the USSR NKVD. The Kalmyks were sent to various locations in Siberia—by January 1944, 24,352 were sent to the Omsk Oblast, 21,164 to Krasnoyarsk Krai, 20,858 to Altai Krai, and 18,333 to Novosibirsk Oblast. Alternative sources indicate that, beginning in 1944, 6,167 Kalmyk families were in the Altai, 7,525 in the Krasnoyarsk, 5,435 in Novosibirsk and 8,353 in the Omsk Region. 660 families were also located in the Tomsk Region, 648 in the Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic, 522 in Tobolsk, 2,796 in the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug and 1,760 in the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug.
Question: Which location were more Kalmyks sent to in Siberia by January 1944, Krasnoyarsk Krai or Altai Krai?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Krasnoyarsk Krai<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The deportation was given the code name Operation Ulusy. In it, a total of 93,139 Kalmyks were uprooted. They were packed into Cattle wagon and dispatched in some 46 trains. One witness recalled that they traveled for two weeks. Many Kalmyks were dirty and unwashed upon arrival; upon exiting, the snow became black from their dirt. The deportation was completed on 31 December. A majority of them (91,919) were deported by the end of the year, though an additional 1,014 people were also evicted in January 1944. Resolution no. 1432 425 of the Soviet of Peoples Commissars, which determined that this ethnic group should be resettled, was adopted on 28 December 1943 and signed by Vyacheslav Molotov, but not made public. The entire operation was guided by the NKVD chief Lavrentiy Beria and his Deputy Commissar Ivan Serov. Other officials who participated in it included Victor Grigorievich Nasedkin, Head of the Gulag and Commissar of the State Security of the 3rd degree, and Dmitri Vasilevich Arkadiev, the Head of the Transport Department of the USSR NKVD. The Kalmyks were sent to various locations in Siberia—by January 1944, 24,352 were sent to the Omsk Oblast, 21,164 to Krasnoyarsk Krai, 20,858 to Altai Krai, and 18,333 to Novosibirsk Oblast. Alternative sources indicate that, beginning in 1944, 6,167 Kalmyk families were in the Altai, 7,525 in the Krasnoyarsk, 5,435 in Novosibirsk and 8,353 in the Omsk Region. 660 families were also located in the Tomsk Region, 648 in the Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic, 522 in Tobolsk, 2,796 in the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug and 1,760 in the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug.
Question: How many more Kalmyks were sent to Omsk Oblast compared to Krasnoyarsk Krai in January 1944? | 3188 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The deportation was given the code name Operation Ulusy. In it, a total of 93,139 Kalmyks were uprooted. They were packed into Cattle wagon and dispatched in some 46 trains. One witness recalled that they traveled for two weeks. Many Kalmyks were dirty and unwashed upon arrival; upon exiting, the snow became black from their dirt. The deportation was completed on 31 December. A majority of them (91,919) were deported by the end of the year, though an additional 1,014 people were also evicted in January 1944. Resolution no. 1432 425 of the Soviet of Peoples Commissars, which determined that this ethnic group should be resettled, was adopted on 28 December 1943 and signed by Vyacheslav Molotov, but not made public. The entire operation was guided by the NKVD chief Lavrentiy Beria and his Deputy Commissar Ivan Serov. Other officials who participated in it included Victor Grigorievich Nasedkin, Head of the Gulag and Commissar of the State Security of the 3rd degree, and Dmitri Vasilevich Arkadiev, the Head of the Transport Department of the USSR NKVD. The Kalmyks were sent to various locations in Siberia—by January 1944, 24,352 were sent to the Omsk Oblast, 21,164 to Krasnoyarsk Krai, 20,858 to Altai Krai, and 18,333 to Novosibirsk Oblast. Alternative sources indicate that, beginning in 1944, 6,167 Kalmyk families were in the Altai, 7,525 in the Krasnoyarsk, 5,435 in Novosibirsk and 8,353 in the Omsk Region. 660 families were also located in the Tomsk Region, 648 in the Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic, 522 in Tobolsk, 2,796 in the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug and 1,760 in the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug.
Question: How many more Kalmyks were sent to Omsk Oblast compared to Krasnoyarsk Krai in January 1944?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
3188<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The deportation was given the code name Operation Ulusy. In it, a total of 93,139 Kalmyks were uprooted. They were packed into Cattle wagon and dispatched in some 46 trains. One witness recalled that they traveled for two weeks. Many Kalmyks were dirty and unwashed upon arrival; upon exiting, the snow became black from their dirt. The deportation was completed on 31 December. A majority of them (91,919) were deported by the end of the year, though an additional 1,014 people were also evicted in January 1944. Resolution no. 1432 425 of the Soviet of Peoples Commissars, which determined that this ethnic group should be resettled, was adopted on 28 December 1943 and signed by Vyacheslav Molotov, but not made public. The entire operation was guided by the NKVD chief Lavrentiy Beria and his Deputy Commissar Ivan Serov. Other officials who participated in it included Victor Grigorievich Nasedkin, Head of the Gulag and Commissar of the State Security of the 3rd degree, and Dmitri Vasilevich Arkadiev, the Head of the Transport Department of the USSR NKVD. The Kalmyks were sent to various locations in Siberia—by January 1944, 24,352 were sent to the Omsk Oblast, 21,164 to Krasnoyarsk Krai, 20,858 to Altai Krai, and 18,333 to Novosibirsk Oblast. Alternative sources indicate that, beginning in 1944, 6,167 Kalmyk families were in the Altai, 7,525 in the Krasnoyarsk, 5,435 in Novosibirsk and 8,353 in the Omsk Region. 660 families were also located in the Tomsk Region, 648 in the Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic, 522 in Tobolsk, 2,796 in the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug and 1,760 in the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug.
Question: Which location were more Kalmyk families located in beginning in 1944, Novosibirsk or the Omsk Region? | the Omsk Region | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The deportation was given the code name Operation Ulusy. In it, a total of 93,139 Kalmyks were uprooted. They were packed into Cattle wagon and dispatched in some 46 trains. One witness recalled that they traveled for two weeks. Many Kalmyks were dirty and unwashed upon arrival; upon exiting, the snow became black from their dirt. The deportation was completed on 31 December. A majority of them (91,919) were deported by the end of the year, though an additional 1,014 people were also evicted in January 1944. Resolution no. 1432 425 of the Soviet of Peoples Commissars, which determined that this ethnic group should be resettled, was adopted on 28 December 1943 and signed by Vyacheslav Molotov, but not made public. The entire operation was guided by the NKVD chief Lavrentiy Beria and his Deputy Commissar Ivan Serov. Other officials who participated in it included Victor Grigorievich Nasedkin, Head of the Gulag and Commissar of the State Security of the 3rd degree, and Dmitri Vasilevich Arkadiev, the Head of the Transport Department of the USSR NKVD. The Kalmyks were sent to various locations in Siberia—by January 1944, 24,352 were sent to the Omsk Oblast, 21,164 to Krasnoyarsk Krai, 20,858 to Altai Krai, and 18,333 to Novosibirsk Oblast. Alternative sources indicate that, beginning in 1944, 6,167 Kalmyk families were in the Altai, 7,525 in the Krasnoyarsk, 5,435 in Novosibirsk and 8,353 in the Omsk Region. 660 families were also located in the Tomsk Region, 648 in the Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic, 522 in Tobolsk, 2,796 in the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug and 1,760 in the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug.
Question: Which location were more Kalmyk families located in beginning in 1944, Novosibirsk or the Omsk Region?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
the Omsk Region<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Raiders off-field fortunes have varied considerably over the years. The teams first three years of operation (1960 Oakland Raiders season–1962 Oakland Raiders season) were marred by poor on-field performance, financial difficulties, and spotty attendance. In 1963 Oakland Raiders season, however, the Raiders fortunes improved dramatically with the introduction of head coach (and eventual owner) Al Davis. In 1967 Oakland Raiders season, after several years of improvement, the Raiders reached the postseason for the first time. The team would go on to win its first (and only) 1967 American Football League Championship Game that year; in doing so, the Raiders advanced to Super Bowl II, where they were soundly defeated by the Green Bay Packers. Since 1963, the team has won 15 division titles (three AFL and 12 NFL), four AFC Championships (1976–77 NFL playoffs, 1980–81 NFL playoffs, 1983–84 NFL playoffs, and 2002–03 NFL playoffs), one AFL Championship (1967 American Football League Championship Game), and three Super Bowl Championships (Super Bowl XI, Super Bowl XV, and Super Bowl XVIII). At the end of the NFLs 2017 NFL season, the Raiders boasted a lifetime regular season record of 462 wins, 411 losses, and 11 ties; their lifetime playoff record currently stands at 25 wins and 19 losses.
Question: How many more NFL division titles than AFL titles have the Raiders won? | 9 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Raiders off-field fortunes have varied considerably over the years. The teams first three years of operation (1960 Oakland Raiders season–1962 Oakland Raiders season) were marred by poor on-field performance, financial difficulties, and spotty attendance. In 1963 Oakland Raiders season, however, the Raiders fortunes improved dramatically with the introduction of head coach (and eventual owner) Al Davis. In 1967 Oakland Raiders season, after several years of improvement, the Raiders reached the postseason for the first time. The team would go on to win its first (and only) 1967 American Football League Championship Game that year; in doing so, the Raiders advanced to Super Bowl II, where they were soundly defeated by the Green Bay Packers. Since 1963, the team has won 15 division titles (three AFL and 12 NFL), four AFC Championships (1976–77 NFL playoffs, 1980–81 NFL playoffs, 1983–84 NFL playoffs, and 2002–03 NFL playoffs), one AFL Championship (1967 American Football League Championship Game), and three Super Bowl Championships (Super Bowl XI, Super Bowl XV, and Super Bowl XVIII). At the end of the NFLs 2017 NFL season, the Raiders boasted a lifetime regular season record of 462 wins, 411 losses, and 11 ties; their lifetime playoff record currently stands at 25 wins and 19 losses.
Question: How many more NFL division titles than AFL titles have the Raiders won?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
9<end_of_turn>
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.