Unnamed: 0 int64 0 3.88k | id stringlengths 44 47 | autor stringclasses 181 values | title stringlengths 2 71 | rank int64 1 5 | maxRank int64 5 5 | source stringclasses 1 value | summary stringlengths 9 396 | body stringlengths 352 24.4k ⌀ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,700 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/994 | Jose Luis | Pequeña miss sunshine | 5 | 5 | muchocine | An independent, brilliant, tape being debated between the intelligent hilarity and more honest drama. | The father is a loser trying to sell its formula for success, grandfather inhaled cocaine and advised her grandson be promiscuous, son wants to be a pilot Aviator and as they do not allow has vowed to remain silent until it is achieved, gay Uncle tried to commit suicide because of a broken heart, the small daughter and plump wants to be a child beauty queen mother tries to put order in all this chaos. And all they are mounted in a, just as chaotic journey, aboard an old van Volks Wagen yellow in one of the best and funniest films of the year.Although regularly insist much on the screenplays of tapes that I see, in this occasion I have stopping me to talk about it further, I believe is one of the brightest I've seen filmed in a long time, from its simplicity, its accuracy and spontaneity, apparently, without great effort goes destornillante laughter, but smartwithout falling into the typical Gringo and silly, comedy to deeply poignant moments, without making dramatic fanfare. A script that is not wasted, nor is wasted, gives each character, its just time your break, and who will step by step building a whole full of color and intensity.But for a film it is not enough with an excellent script, we need an extraordinary address, and this ran in charge of the authors of the script, it's Valerie Faris and Jonathan Dayton, those responsible for an impressive amount of music videos for groups such as Red Hot Chili Peppers and r. e. M.'s iconic, them together, were in charge of the simple but fair implementation of the tapeacrobáticamente balance several opposite tones which has the story.But without a doubt the greatest success of his work, it is the acting ensemble, to get to the right actress for each character and the actor and also, put them to work forming an excellent team on screen, a real family, rarely seen in the film. From Toni Collete as the mother, Greg Kinnear as the father, Steve Carrell as the suicidal guy, until the grandfather and the more young, all performing outstanding acting work, always highlighting the irreconcilable differences between each of the members of the family and taking the limit her adventures? And misadventures!In this way the directors erected a story about the nature of the family, the search for authenticity and at the same time an incisive critique of the Yankee life that aims to make everything that touches in a beauty contest, as one of the characters screams; is life a beauty contest after another high school, the University? A life in which it is assumed all should Peel for being winners and a country seen as losers and "freaks" to all those who do not try to. But as the story progresses you end up wondering: who is really normal or "freak"? Who is really a loser?Do and although it may seem complicated perhaps the complete film can be summarized to a single scene, great, fun and meaningful at the same time, that that, once the vehicle in that travel it decomposes, everyone has to push him to throw him to walk and one uninterested between jumping and racing? What this is not be part of a family? |
1,701 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1675 | Yojimbo | El buen alemán | 2 | 5 | muchocine | A film that becomes heavy and sings to shabby copy of those years of great film style. We need much more soak the film in the essence of the film. | Remakes, homages, copies, plagiarism? all these words enter the vocabulary of a cinema increasingly saturated with repeated ideas and recovery of styles and arguments. Steven Soderbergh, which seems that it do what they want, now sells us a presumable classic Court film simply because it uses the black and white and a music inspired by big scores of other movie times.The bizarre plot of this film painted with black and white and some actors trying to emulate the American cinema of the "Casablanca time" appear to be the only claim of a director used to do what he wants.Recover the curtains, rich orchestration music and a picture in white and black to disguise a history of conspiracies and secrets does not serve to make a moderately interesting film. In fact, all that style that aims to wrap the film as a "classic" collides head-on with many interpretative aspects and mise en scène.A film that becomes heavy and sings to shabby copy of those years of great film style. We need much more soak the film in the essence of the film.Notably, as always, the great work of Cate Blanchett and loabl attempt of Thomas Newman by blow a few notes in tune with the style that the director it has imposed. |
1,702 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/557 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | Click | 3 | 5 | muchocine | In some parts of the footage, I thought, in its minimum transcendence, a curious, acceptable, entertaining movie, extension of like God or trapped in time, best films with the same mimbres... | Click is not a comedy to use, although its traces so prefiguren: lacks the rudeness of the comedy to use, that is, the story that unfolds around inevitable gags, good or bad, drag your drive despistan the Viewer to, led, premedita and sibilinamente, to the consent, to consider what has been the most innocent way, naïve and frivolous possible. Masters of the modern comedy (the Farrelly brothers, put for example) you press these precepts and not disappoint in theirs, in their house brand. Perhaps by this Click is not a mediocre film: bears witness to the world in which we live and tells the life of who to see fulfilled their dreams uses a magical object (remote control) which makes him a little God of his cosmos of fantasy.Adam Sandler meets more than in a role that has done too many times. His comical is already known, not flees from it: it sucks, does it predictable and, therefore, makes us laugh less. Not being a bad actor, nor does. Another case to highlight is Christopher Walken, an absolutely brilliant actor, one of those faces that are sculpted in flesh so that screen amplify and we look and we drill with their gestures, looking, but here friend Walken patina, hence to boredom and unconvincing. Long has already ceased to excite us. I remember now (and I'm going by the branches, as my I like) a role often, but impressive, in the desaprovechada catch me if you can, the Spielberg master. In the end.Click is a film of summer that has fallen into this autumn novice. Also get the icon of tacky, the King of the hairy chest, David Hasselhoff. They have not cut into production when it comes to pull this myth of crappy television, which has probably enjoyed as a Cossack in the wheels of the press in Europe. Be bored, I guess, without its table of beach salvation and his fantastic car.The gentle reader will be giving account Click has little chicha that these lines roam it, her evade, avoid entering the mud of its warm efficiency. It is quite true. It has, however, its sediment of sorrow, evidence cuasimetafísica that life cannot be reduced to a zapping and time, his final Squire, does not support frivolities. For this reason, in some parts of the footage, I thought, in its minimum transcendence, a curious, acceptable, entertaining movie, extension of like God or trapped in time, best films with the same mimbres. |
1,703 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/81 | Iñigo | Crash | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Despite his mistakes, so it manages and represents is a very notable film | "Crash" is a controversial film. But it seems that face a criticism of it is even more controversial. Let's go by parts. The film has enough in their favor. It is a work, above all, very overwhelming, with abundant amount of good cinema and know-how.It was writer of the drama "Million Dollar Baby" demonstrates that he knows something more to write. Their film knowledge are large, of that there is no doubt, as evidenced in this his first film to the address. Flat sequence are wonderful moments crucial are directed with a mastery of worthy of mention, emotional music is bound at the exact moment and cast raya at a great level.Between so good interpretation (an exceptional Dillon, a large Cheadle, a Newton and Howard incredible. come on, all of the cast) and many characters of Sandra Bullock goes totally unnoticed.But. Yes, the movie has several buts. Greater or lesser importance (according to the degree of emotional impact that has led to the film in one) can be given, but what can not is to deny them aseptic perspective.It is obvious that Paul Haggis is controversial, and therefore must be borne in mind that any resolution could cause collateral damage. Thus, the best in these cases (only if you want to avoid the controversy), usually treat the film with the greater possible ambiguity. And it is clear the director knows, is to disguise its ideological positioning, but succumbs in several attempts.Firstly, it must be said that, in a global sense, "Crash" is such a sensitive subject as racism and solitary confinement due to culture shock with sum intelligence, without excessive stereotype and entering land trivial and manichaeans. But there are too close to the cartoon characters and that they tend to exaggerate, without being able to avoid, thus falling into the clichés as feared.And it is also true that the decisive moment for the characters may seem somewhat manipulative and easy to emotionally speaking, pulling towards to the sensationalism that ultra-lenta camera with heavenly music as background. As if Paul Haggis was to provoke the Viewer.But those moments and film quality, also raise the film. Reach levels close to the daunting. And it moves.The script is very good, no doubt, but (in addition to the subjective feeling of irrigating some level of hate) characters do not end of frame at all. It concludes with the impression of not having given the necessary game to the inner spiritual and life of the protagonists. It seems a sort of incomplete description to, it is true, does not affect the general appearance of the film, but that it could have raised more the complexity and quality of the final product. Therefore, this kind of bastard son of "Lives Crusades" Robert Altman or "Magnolia" by Paul Thomas Anderson, does not reach the greatness of the same level. It even gets to the depth (especially relating to the characters and their quest for vital sense), complexity and epic level of "Magnolia".Maybe with more footage the error could be corrected. Maybe.It is true that what is most valued in a director and his intelligence is showing aseptic and know to bring that feeling to the Viewer, without seeking to make judgments or justify, leaving us to us the role of the decision. Thus, proves that he really understands and is able to delve into what he is talking about, giving the opportunity of redemption to any positioning. That is what Kieslowski defined as "craftsman".But we are going to give more opportunities, because that is his first foray into this world. And it is a huge first step. Few begin as well as Paul Haggis. And I think he deserves further progress and correcting errors. It will grow as well. Then, we'll see. For now, as a tribute to "Magnolia" (which reached to remember much at times), we will preach with forgiveness.That Yes, it is not morally acceptable nor sense is that we complain of the obviousness of the anti-racist message of the film (which is true it's partly) when we bother by the ambiguity arising other films to deal with such complicated issues. This is called contradiction.I am not going to be me who deny it, the film is very exaggerated and difficult. But he also has a strange, abstract, delightful and almost poetic beauty. And he makes it clear, once and for all, that racism, prejudice and intolerance are not things of a single race. Not based on who invented, but on the basis of who practices it. And, in essence, it's something more dangerous, dehumanized and globalized.Therefore, ultimately, despite their mistakes, so it manages and represents is a very notable film, as it impacts, does reflect much and, in a way, risk. Note landing on the screens of this type of films, and that does not happen very often. "It is certainly a fact very much in his favour"."Brokeback Mountain" is too tough to "Crash", both from a qualitative point of view and from the simple and likely positioning of the votes. However, cannot be said to not keep the type. It is a very worthy film.There is a phrase in the film which is probably the most significant: "." "We long so much this contact that we collide against each other just to feel something." |
1,704 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1118 | Francisco Bellón | Mujeres en el parque | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Women in the Park is a good film that dissects a few characters to display them as they are to the public. However, it is half way of the excellent film that could have been, which is always a real shame. | Every year, during the months of January and February, the charts of the Spanish cinemas are filled with a huge amount of titles from Hollywood, most of them with aspirations to the Oscars, or at least theoretically made to suck up to them. For this reason, it is not surprising that barely has premieres of Spanish films during the first months of each year, because they expect warmed until it reaches March and with it the Festival of Málaga. But there is always some courageous trying to cope with the American avalanche, and Felipe Vega is one of them.Daniel (Adolfo Fernández), music teacher and pianist, and Ana (Blanca Apilánez), gallerist, in crisis of couple after more than twenty years of life in common. Daniel has gone to live alone and wants to divorce. Anne refuses to accept the reality. Distress affects his daughter Monica (Barbara Lennie), which, after finishing his studies of journalism, is particularly sensitive to not find work. Felipe Vega is a very personal and equipped with a high sensitivity, filmmaker as it already demonstrated in his previous work, this great little story which was summer clouds. With women in the Park, Vega and Manuel Hidalgo (his usual co-screenwriter) go a step further and make a portrait of the separation on crises that can affect a person and how they affect inevitably in others. It is simply a portrait of the human soul, a dark and at times turbulent part. The main virtue of the film is the sense of reality that transmits, with nearby, and real characters that any viewer can recognize easily. Vega does not judge his characters but yes examines them with magnifying glass, analyzing them until exhaustion, to display, as we said before, a facet of the human soul without ornaments and flourishes. Regardless of original score, the music of Chopin serves as necessary vehicle to talk by the characters, say what they silent, in short, to transmit all kinds of feelings to the Viewer. However, the tape has some defects, like the ups and downs of the script, which causes history to decay and lose intensity in some moments. Does this not help precisely the style of narration of Vega, leisurely and calm, to slow down in excess. It is a story based on his characters, the work of the actors is essential. And all respond giving the best, works excellent, full of naturalness and realism, and contributing to the feeling of truth that conveys the film. Especially noted the Madrid young Bárbara Lennie, with a clean performance and great emotional containment.Women in the Park is a good film that dissects a few characters to display them as they are to the public. However, it is half way of the excellent film that could have been, which is always a real shame. |
1,705 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1910 | Pruden Rodríguez | Borat | 2 | 5 | muchocine | I do not think smart, biting, or funny, or anything of what he wanted and what many want to see. Stays at the gates of everything and its escatological gags in the background are the only thing that saves. | I'm late to this criticism, but now I understand why. Something inside me was reluctant, said me that the he would not, he malgastase not the time. However, some more or less favorable reviews and that of "we will have to see it, is not that." I finally pushed to witness this spectacle. And when I say show not say "wow, what a show!", but "pff." often show. "."The argument is as simple as the rest of the film: after a quick presentation of the protagonist and his surreal environment, his country of origin, you have in the USA, where their heads are waiting to make a documentary that serves to Kazakhstan, to learn from the great power. There Borat starts a crazy trip full of rocambolescas situations. and anyway, if I did not give more details is not by not revealing anything, is because he does not deserve more.The fact is that this mockumentary strain not as a documentary, as fiction, or as a hybrid or as nothing. He is supposed to have two strong points: critical acid, corrosive, bla, bla, bla, and blatant and irreverent humor. Well, let's start by critics. Borat, in its way, meets characters which is supposed represent the deep North America. We have some racist, some xenophobic and other colorful characters. Intelligent criticism? I read that somewhere and I think that the standards are very low. It is true that there is a desire to get the dirt of a society really behind in many ways (at least one significant part of that society), but it stays always far of being interesting, shocking or crushing. It is a compilation of loose anecdotes which no can be nothing, except that one it has never heard of the USA. Bowling for Columbine is a damning criticism, not this. They may say that it is pamphleteer, but provides much and one has the feeling of having discovered something. Not here.The other issue is the humor. I think, after seeing many comedies of all kinds, that the big problem is that the majority of people lack sense of humor. One may not like it a running gag by two things: you don't understand, does not share such "jokes", etc. either is seen above. I.e., understand it, it is the kind of humor that likes, but fails their demands. If you are the type of people who laughs at family gatherings, desternilla with anecdotes of Uncle Paco and regards Ramón García as a comedian, then this film you will seem very blatant, irreverent and all that stuff. If you back, if you think that there are few people who have the ability to laugh at one to taste, if it is selective, has criteria and Los Morancos nor do you draw a grimace, then you will see that Borat fails, it tries to but it stays on the road. And good humor can be and criticism deep at the same time, no one is fooled. Cartoon "The Simpsons", "Family guy", type etc. are a great example, or "Life of Brian", to cite a film with real actors.Ultimately, I do not think smart, biting, or funny, or anything of what he wanted and what many want to see. Stays at the gates of everything and its escatological gags in the background are the only thing that saves. If it does not support the cruel jokes, the mockery, humiliation, etc., then neither arises to see her. The nonsense are only minimally notable. |
1,706 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1996 | Jeremy Fox | La flauta mágica | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Its flaws are forgotten due to interpretations, wonderful music and the brilliant direction of Kenneth Branagh. | Those who know me know that I try to follow me in my comments to purely cinematic. "However there are occasions, like this one, in which a few preliminary clarifications are essential.""The magic flute" (The Magic Flute) is not a film for everyone. I would like to say that if you hate Opera or classical music is not your movie. We have an adaptation of an opera by Mozart and, therefore, most of the time the players are singing opera. Surprised, or feel disappointed by this, would be ridiculous.Now if you like Opera, or without being a lover of Opera or classical, you have the Mint open to enjoy new artistic experiences, then, and only then?Let's talk about film."Because movies, so in capital letters, is what distill each and every one of the films of Kenneth Branagh to date (even the less good).""The magic flute" starts with a (false) up prodigious sequence, which make time, in which we move from soldiers in the trenches until the aircraft in the sky. With such brilliant start, Branagh creates a visual equivalent to the Overture to the Opera, introducing with mastery in the context in which the story will move.Before an impressive beginning, it is very difficult to maintain the level during the footage, but without reaching the genius of this script, the movie succeeds and Branagh demonstrates thereby having lost none of his narrative claw. His work as a director is one of the strong points of the film.Since the beginning of the project, everyone has had its (logical) doubts about the work of the actors. The risk of that to employ professional singers (something inevitable in a project of this type) lost in acting ability. I have to say that not only is not the case but people like Benjamin Jay Davis (Papageno), Joseph Kaiser (Tamino), René Pape (Sarastro), Tom Randle (Monostatos) or Lyubov Petrova (Queen of the night) are really good and some, such as the aforementioned Jay Davis, show a great comic vis. More loose in that paragraph perhaps Amy Carson is a little bland.But the movie is not perfect. Indeed, it has a major inherited defect, I believe, of the original libretto: certain lack of consistency. If in the original script these small inconsistencies can apologize for being a text full of references and Masonic in the film and already devoid of that reading keys, it is not so Mann. In this way there are jumps in the history that are strange, as see appear or disappear certain characters without any explanation.There are also some scene that Branagh has resolved with inserts fast to try to explain parts of history that would not be otherwise clear. The result in this case is not entirely satisfactory and could understand her any Hackney of videoclipera. This happens, in any case, in a scene or two.What happens is that these defects, any important stress, are for me almost forgotten thanks to performances and, above all, the wonderful score of (very accessible in addition to the profane public like me) Mozart and the brilliant direction of a Kenneth Branagh showing that it remains one of the visually most exciting conductors on the international scene.Final evaluation of moonfleet.es: 8 out of 10. |
1,707 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1113 | Jeremy Fox | Ratónpolis | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Pleasant viewing animated film but that will not go down in history or too long will remain in our memory. | "British" (Flushed Away) is an Aardman production directed by David Bowers and Sam Fell. Tells the story of Roddy (Hugh Jackman in the original version), a high-society rat, after falling to the sewers from the bathroom of your House, multiple adventures will live and discover a very different life than that known.Aardman is a name associated so far, with the cinema of animation with plasticine. It is the creative factory feature "Evasion on the farm" and the drama "Wallace and Gromit: the curse of the vegetables" as well as short films of these last characters or the "Creature Comforts" television series.For this reason, his leap to the 3D computer animated feature film, was expected with curiosity and enthusiasm by fans. The result, without being disappointing, do not think it meets too such illusions.Starting with defects will say that, although in the character design is has been trying to keep the visual style of the company, on the pass to the 3D part of the essence is lost. The usual generic transgression is not here present and lack something of the freshness and originality.In other words, "British" is more conventional than its predecessors and seems born with the will, on the other hand respectable, sweeping to victory at the box office. That Yes, without renouncing to quality criteria and a few touches of humor quite British and they provide some of the best moments of the film.These defects are offset, for me, for a couple of fairly important virtues. The first of these is the accelerated pace of the film, I would almost say that too high if we put picky, that they make a really entertaining although somewhat experience hasty.Add, moreover, a funny script although not anything innovative and we get a nice viewing animated film but that will not go down in history or you'll be too long in our memory. As it stands the courtyard that leaves at a level something higher than average but far from the brilliance which the cinema of animation can be reached. |
1,708 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/703 | Elena Suárez | Infiltrados | 4 | 5 | muchocine | When the taste for classic and contemporary are associated in perfect harmony, a director of the likes of Scorsese surprises us with a film that, first and foremost, entertains us. | When the taste for classic and contemporary are associated in perfect harmony a director of the likes of Scorsese surprises us with a film that, first and foremost, entertains us because it has the necessary elements for this: an interesting history, organized narrative structure, a good dose of action, a few actors that convince us, a perfect use of time (both)(, that a film of two hours and a half is not heavy) and, as a final auction also boasts an excellent soundtrack.If anyone still doubt the acting ability of Leonardo DiCaprio (something that does not understand that he was unbeatable in do's Eating Gilbert Grape), possibly after seeing this fantastic story begins to give him a vote of confidence. Although, if know it a little they worry not because an intelligent and irreverent bad, of those who love, interpreted by a ripe Jack Nicholson and a beloved COP noble and elegant in the hands of Martin Sheen.A Scorsese are also likes the classic crime film and therefore is welcome because in that film he cares and pampers all the characters (up to the most despicable), and that makes that the film will not be orphaned of intelligence and feelings, that Yes, wetting it and pointing the finger it is not common sense in a group (that one thing is that the villain is not idiot and quite another, that it is a blessed).Unlike other films of the genre more explicitly detailing the organized world of the mafia (something that has already done the same director in Gangs of New York, 2002) in infiltrators, the narration exceed more than information, although it contains some winks that will take us back to the harsh reality for a few seconds.Without doubt, a great production, characteristic of an industry that understands the film as entertainment which must also be profitable (something that Europe does not always happen). |
1,709 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3459 | Francisco Bellón | La habitacion de Fermat | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Fermat's room is a film that initially caught by its disquieting atmosphere, but it sinks because so little credible are the characters and actors, except Santi Millán, which interpret. | There are certain actors, directors or writers, who have partners mentally with a type of film or programme, and it seems inconceivable that they can do something that drifts away from what in what are encasillados. Luis Piedrahita and Rodrigo Sopeña have always moved in humor, as lead partner of comedy shows, such as the Club of the comedy, nothing x here or the Hormiguero.Sin embargo, for her first foray of jointly in the film, they put aside the comedy and was released with a completely opposite gender, suspense film. Fermat's room is a film that attracts by its more than interesting initial approach, four mathematical locked up in a room without output, which is shrinking gradually, and because he is a type of suspense different from that usually offer the film. However, within minutes, one of the major failings of the film is discovered, and except for Santi Millán, there is not anyone who believes that Alejo Sauras, Elena Ballesteros and Lluís Homar incluo, are a few brilliant mathematicians. But the defect lies not only in the choice of actors and their performances, but also because the characters are poorly built and worse developed. The atmosphere is very successful, providing fair concern and the burden so that the tape pass on that feeling of suffocation that catches the viewer completely. But oh, this atmosphere is only kept the first half hour, the same that lasts the originality of the script. From that moment, the plot happens in a hasty manner, becomes monotonous and predictable, losing all the excitement, to result in a resolution artificiosa, simplistic and nothing credible.Fermat's room is a film that initially caught by its disquieting atmosphere, but it sinks because so little credible are the characters and actors, except Santi Millán, which interpret. The film could have been over it with a more polished script, a more elaborate and less hasty resolution, and a more careful casting. |
1,710 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2960 | Rafa Delgado | En busca de la felicidad | 4 | 5 | muchocine | A ' how beautiful is to live!', much smaller, light and modern. | We are facing a very topical and predictable film. Only to see the poster and you say "HA!" "I know how it ends". But the film is so well done and performed, and it is so entertaining, that you just imported a damn.Well, it's not entertaining taaaaaaaan, because if a fat stick has this movie is its excessive length for what counts. Two hours of "aaaaaaaay I have no pa' coméeeeee!" and miserable several that Will Smith and his mini-negrito - cool MTV have to endure. As they say in the estimable web the hours lost, is the 'Terminator 2' films of kleenex. At times it is eternal and other very light, a very rare thing.But that is the only downside. Everything else is a joy. And Will Smith is enormous, his nomination to the Oscar is more than deserved, and the rest of the cast included his son, are at an altitude of dignísima.A ' how beautiful is to live!', much smaller, light and modern.Essential to the original version (as with all the movies, but hey.). |
1,711 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3047 | Kiko de España | Concursante | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Debut in the length of Rodrigo Cortés reminds me, by the elegant invoice in the city without limits. The head wheel brave, fearless and with an actor in State of grace hiperactivísimo that eats the screen. To jugaaaaaaaaar! | Well, contestant is a movie that should have seen the film and I've rented in the videoclú, we're going to do.Debut in the length of Rodrigo Cortés reminds me, by the elegant invoice in the city without limits. The head wheel brave, fearless and with an actor in State of grace hiperactivísimo that eats the screen.Cortés returns at times that the video gave him goes hand in hand in a couple of moments (the horse) but visually is so powerful and has a screenplay so perfectly assembled in those images (again, powerful) that "you her comes with potatoes" surpassing those delusions of grandeur initials that can put the viewer in against him.The effects can make you think the Fincher pre-Zodiac and that, when we are talking about a Spanish director must be good balls. |
1,712 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/440 | Kiko de España | Una historia de Brooklyn | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Emotional, Martian, tough, aggressive, fast, energetic, funny, real, biting, ironic... all this in a little (very little) more than eighty minutes. | Mr Baumbach was known for making films with Eric Stolz, go curriculum. What happens is that the shadow / influence of Wes Anderson is elongated, and after working together on the screenplay of The life aquatic, Noah Baumbach has directed his masterpiece.Emotional, Martian, hard, aggressive, fast, energetic, fun, real, biting, ironic. all this in a little (very little) more than eighty minutes. What a lucky remix of women and husbands, the Tenenbaum and Kramer against Kramer, a priori seem to a lot of drawbacks are transformed into an honest proposal of well-understood indie.All stratospheric actors in some papers that are made to suit and in which everyone, including children (huge, Owen Kline) give everything. Photography in 16 mm of Robert D. Yeoman, usual Anderson and now Manolete, gives that touch eighties in NY that inevitably we evokes Woody Allen.La soundtrack also is very Tenenbaum. Easily one of the best films of the year.A 9´5. (and that leaves a Baldwin) do by what far superior to American films beauty (see the ice storm or this history of Brooklyn), are so different Fortune? |
1,713 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2397 | Oscar Cantero | La noche del cazador | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The only film that led Charles Laughton, and a product in which the nuances and the specific scenes are more important than the whole. | Robert Mitchum was without doubt one of the great screen, but perhaps never him has positioned at the height of other peers with similar talent have reached higher levels of popularity and recognition.In the night of the Hunter, she plays an assassin who meets a thief sentenced to death by hanging for murdering two people during the Commission of a theft of $10,000 of the era, who were never found in prison. In its belief that the children of the deceased know the location of the booty, he married the widow to try to get it.Equipped with hard characteristics and optimal characterisation, Mithcum plays the role of a man hypocritical and misleading, while preaching the word of Christ, kills and steals with extreme cruelty, managing director and own actor provide a great credibility to the character, which conveys perfectly the feeling of being a person without any scruples or feelingswith a look empty. The interaction of this evil being with the children of the deceased, generates an intense concern in the spectator, which envisages a confrontation between two forces disproportionate among themselves, which on the other hand could be the incarnation of good and evil, words that incidentally has tattooed on his fists the preacher.The ease with which deceives the world, contrasts with the speed with which the child discovers his true evil intentions. A conception extremely macho life, typical of rural America from the 1950s, is observed throughout the entire film and most of the dialogues.In any case, must not fall into the temptation to take it better than it is by the mere fact of belonging to the classic film, nor because it is performed by one of the greats. It is an entertaining movie, but without more, with several gaps and excessive use of fades and forced scene changes. In addition, nor is, nor by far, the best interpretation of Mitchum, which by necessity to the script should produce with excessive hieratismo, in a role that did not favor his qualities. Laughton was best actor to director, although nobody can deny what the originality in the approach to this film, which while it is being improved, is an undeniable quality. |
1,714 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/539 | Verolindapechocha | El diablo viste de Prada | 3 | 5 | muchocine | I am sure that will male find so hilarious this story as the girls. | Again, the lovely actress Anne Hathaway (diary of a Princess / Brokeback Mountain) is measured with an artist of weight as the great Meryl Streep, who this time portraying the devil, a cold and ruthless editor of the most costly and influential New York.The Devil Wears Prada (2006) fashion magazine, translated as the Devil Wears Prada, it is the story of Andy (Anne Hathaway)a young journalist graduated from the University, who seeks to open up the way in some written form of the big city, with her boyfriend (Adrian Grenier), a contender to chef.Here should be something separate to say that guy Grenier not him reaching or heels to your partner's screen. I have the impression that the Lords of the casting too focused on the female performers.In the end. Andy after sending many resumes, is called by a publishing house, which among other things manages the aforementioned magazine, commanded by the cruel and scary winter Queen, Miranda (Meryl Streep), a name that is synonymous with everything the big fashion icons represent. A word yours, a gesture can mean the rise or fall in Tailspin of designers, models, photographers and anyone engaged in the ruthless world of fashion.Human resources "mistakenly" sent to Andy for the post of second personal assistant of Miranda: literally be your 24/7 slave, not ask questions and always wear fashion. "Andy is obviously not a girl on cover (vale would in desgreñar her a little, however, in my opinion, it still saw very beautiful) is not at all interested in the frivolities of a job, but need to work to pay the rent and thinks that this magazine in a good way to start contacting the world media in the city.""Any girl kill for this work, if raisins a year you can here, working in the environment you want," warns the first Assistant of Miranda, Emily (Emily Blunt), another of his slaves, whose only dream is to go to Paris for fashion week and get the most out of designer wedding dresses.Little by little and to survive, the sweet and innocent Andy is changing in a seemingly as cold as the rest workhólica, no time for her boyfriend, his friends, nor to write. I do not more because it is worth seeing her. I am sure that they have so much fun as I do. Although it could be catalogued as a "chick flick" I would recommend it to everyone. I am sure that will male find so hilarious this story as the girls.Interpretations of the two protagonists are great, it is rumored that Meryl Streep would be nominated for an Oscar for this role. Really Meryl rectified outweigh its mediocre role in the also recently released and included, Prime. |
1,715 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1917 | Francisco Bellón | La maldición de la flor dorada | 5 | 5 | muchocine | The curse of the Golden Flower is a film of a great formal and aesthetic perfection, a pleasure for the senses of the spectator, which if left trapped by Zhang Yimou, will discover the poetry behind each scene. | Even only for a minority, the curse of the Golden Flower was one of the most anticipated films of the season, a lot more than the tape it megalomaniacal Hollywood which premiered this week. Zhang Yimou's previous efforts have only a possible adjective, and it is exceptional, scratching in the masterpiece, especially Hero.Yimou is a very personal director, although there will be many who did not appreciate his talent and only see a few mere comic of fighting in his works.Zhang Yimou manages what very few Directors have done throughout history, and do poetry with images. The script is a mere excuse to organize a real spectacle for the senses as not seen in a movie theater since the great Akira Kurosawa, although those are big words, and to Yimou still has much to even approaching the figure of the great Japanese filmmaker. The curse of the Golden Flower is proposing a story tinged tragedy at the end of the first Millennium Chinese court. A story full of palatial intrigue, conspiracies, wishes and desires in the purest line of Shakespeare, bridging the gap. There is who has written that this tape loosely resembles blood throne (adaptation of Macbeth, by the way), although if you want to search similarities with Kurosawa, should rather go to Ran. However, all of this matters little, as the huge visual spectacle that unfolds before the eyes of the spectator cloudy everything else. The forbidden city in Beijing is the ideal framework for Yimou make a sunset in really impressive scene, with some brimming with levels of beauty and poetry, such as family gatherings, the aerial views of the courtyards filled with chrysanthemums or throughout the last half hour of the film. It highlights the strength of the picture of Zhao Xiaoding, immense, with a chromatic palette worthy of a master, as well as the choreography of astonishing plasticity.The curse of the Golden Flower is a film of a great formal and aesthetic perfection, a pleasure for the senses of the spectator, which if left trapped by Zhang Yimou, will discover the poetry behind each scene and each level. Make a scene full of beauty and lyricism of a match only is within reach of a few chosen, and this is one of them. |
1,716 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2053 | Rafa Ferrer | Zodiac | 4 | 5 | muchocine | The truth is that there was much time not so much enjoying at a meeting of good cinema. A tremendously delicious Ribbon, perhaps a tad long, but good... | To speak of "Zodiac" the first thing to do is to speak of childhood of its director, my always beloved David Fincher, is that, being a more tender infante, and living in S.Francisco, he had to go through terror or horror be threat of this ruthless serial killer, did not become a trauma for the little David, but if something that marked him and that sooner or later proposed having, already on his first tape "Sev7en" spoke of serial killers, and here in "Zodiac" (which has nothing to do with his first film) returns to the fray with the same subject, although from a completely different Prism, this time, to say nothing, is recreated in the Zodiac murders and if in the investigation of his "work".The truth is that there was much time not so much enjoying at a meeting of good cinema, embodied, played masterfully by Jake Gyllenhaal. that gives life to the author of the book on which is based the tape, Mark Ruffalo, Anthony Edwards (with a wig impossible), Robert Downey Jr.y more than enough Brian Cox (this I have compared with Ed Harris, and it is only their very presence on a tape to improve more than viewing).Perhaps, as a negative note he would talk of their excessive duration, and is that at the beginning of the footage becomes in long flat, artistic and that they have little to do with the outcome of the investigation, and they drag their duration until the 160 min. and it is that one comes from the film with the more bare than a baboon butt. |
1,717 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1198 | Calaf | Banderas de nuestros padres | 3 | 5 | muchocine | I always have the feeling that there is still half with Eastwood. Half have brilliant dialogues. Halfway in the criticism that starts but doesn't break at all. Halfway in the emotions. | Flags of our fathers tells the story of the famous photo obtained and used as propaganda in World War II by the United States against the Japanese in the island of Iwo Jima.Vaya ahead which is a good movie. The war is very well filmed, in the style of the great opening sequence of Spielberg (film producer) in saving soldier Ryan. At the same time, the part that 3 of those soldiers who managed to put the flag on the top of the top are taken on tour to raise funds is counting. To me these flashbacks did not work me at all. I think that some of the personajesno are introduced well when they are then mentioned them and you do not remember a who is named.I always have the feeling that there is still half with Eastwood. Half have brilliant dialogues. Halfway in the criticism that starts but doesn't break at all. Halfway in the emotions. And in this case it gets footage, becoming boring at times.Of course, it has notable things, which I summarize the section, the best.It will please many, but to me I just do not convince. |
1,718 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3972 | Berto | Soy leyenda | 2 | 5 | muchocine | The movie begins well, progresses a bit worse, falls some moments in the tedium, and ends abruptly, and, if you press me, not very comprehensible way, all as a result of a script that he prefers entering the simplest action. | Already some time, possibly since the day of tomorrow, not we saw here an example of film of disasters that so in vogue was in the 1970s, and precisely, has been a remake, remake, adaptation or as want to call it, the last man live, where Charlton Heston, with no one who shoot him with his rifle during the dayIt campaba by L.A. and Woodstock looked over and over again. Now is Will Smith who does Robert Neville, become a scientist of the army who, after losing his entire family and see how a supposed cure against cancer (discovered by Emma Thompson, ojito) had just been leaving desert worldwide, lives with his dog Sam as he tries desperately to find a cure for those infected.It will Smith is one of those few actors on which a film can rest without that to the respectable they do want to strangle him or ingested cyanide capsule, and I am legend is no exception to this rule. Perhaps since that Tom Hanks made the flight of the lost aircraft not watched an actor occupy as many minutes of screen solo and get keep entertaining to the public, although it is based on making dominated in bar, and always share screen with a family member; in this case, his daughter Willow (no kinship with the adorable dwarf).The movie begins well, progresses a bit worse, falls some moments in the tedium, and ends abruptly, and, if you press me, not very comprehensible way. All as a result of a script that he prefers entering the simplest action in the exploration of some concepts that they point in the movie, but just leaving once, for the greater glory of the explosion and the fight. I'm not saying that they should not be, eye, but it gives the impression that had to justify the 300 million spent, possibly on the salary of Smith, because those infected seem to have emerged from Blade II, and look on the screen pretty bad, to be honest.The head of the tape is Francis Lawrence, whose only reference in cinema is Constantine, and comes of well, sure that not it it takes much guess, isn't it? Yes, naturally, the world of the music video. It isn't to do especially evil, and there are even some interesting point (the disturbing presentation for the first time of the infected, for example, with its back to Neville), but in the fights not we learned much, although you are a black type of feet against the ugly brother of Gollum. still, as the thing is does not extend much more than 100 minutes, and Smith it goes without charisma, can be seen with pleasure while one doesn't start to ask too many questions about how the alpha male has made to learn crafts, or why it is worse cold Vermont than in the raw New York winter. Fortunately, by what we see in the film, none will have to swallow in theaters Batman vs. Superman. It is something. |
1,719 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1215 | Ivan Sainz-Pardo | Rocky Balboa | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Thanks Stallone and thanks Rocky, thanks to both, for giving us, nothing more and nothing less than a lifetime captured on celluloid. A life full of good values, sorrows and joys, real moments and, above all, of so many, so many emotions. | First of all, I apologize for extensive of this criticism and I recommend who still has not seen any of the films, including the last one, do not continue reading, because I betraying the plot of much of the saga. This is one of the sagas more successful and most famous in the history of the cinema, with all my respect to Bond, James Bond, who if the destination not remedy it soon, someday will give away me a record Guinness to be the only Western which still has not seen any of his numerous titles. Respectfully from here to his followers, also Sean Connery and the rest, but my thing is already something as a paradox of chance, a strange spate of circumstances and, lately, I recognize that there is also something of personal pride to a no doubt taste of burnt rice. I arrived very late and the incredible pirouettes of the famed English gentleman fail to really capture my interest. Rocky saga spans three decades from the first film until the last and most recent delivery. Let me start from the beginning: in 1976, an unknown actor, Sylvester Stallone, wrote a script called Paradise Alley (the street of the Paradise), inspired by a fight between Muhammad Ali and Chuck Wepner. The script fell into the hands of the producers Irwin Winkler and Robert Chartoff who, at first, were contrary to the commitment and the will of Stallone embody the Boxer protagonist. But this was really the first battle won by Stallone, who got the role and the production of his film dream. And although the film lost points against the powerful Apollo Creed, this won, however, by K. Or and in the first assault, Scorsese, who saw as Rocky was carried that year Oscar best film above its magnificent "Taxi Driver". Stallone was kept the title of your script and reserved it for another film that the same shot and played two years later and that, in our country, it became known as "Hell's kitchen". The script and the film about the boxer from Philadelphia became known as "Rocky". The Stallone film was shot in less than a month and with a modest little more than 1 million dollars budget and grossed more than 115 million just in the United States. Stunned by the Jubilee, audiences and critics, was joined in his favour and the tape became, in addition, with other two Oscars, that of best film editing and best Director of a total of 10 nominations and having received other Golden Globe Award and 6 nominations also for best film. If you ask me, I would say that "Rocky" is a wonderful drama, very well built, full of heart and epic and tells, perfectly, a story about self-improvement and the search for oneself. It is the story of an Italian-American boxer of talent, but without faith or opportunities, Rocky Balboa, who lives and earn the living in a low and depressed neighborhood of Philadelphia. It works as pluriempleado, boxing by four bitches and threatening to delinquent as a bully of little Assistant mounts. He has a crush on Adrian, sister of his friend Poli. Adrian is a very shy woman who works in a small pet store with Rocky, who will try to establish a loving relationship. Thanks to the fate, luck and partly due to its flashy nickname, "The Italian Colt" is gives you, in overnight, the opportunity of a lifetime. You can deal with the current heavyweight champion and dreaming about the title. "Rocky" story a honest, universal, of those Americans, in their national egotism and brazenly seizing the term, referred to as "The American dream". The truth is that Rocky is a good movie, but is also a film quite overrated, and proves the same Stallone with the sequel Rocky II, where he manages to break the myth of "the second parts were never good" tracing the structure and formulates it magic of the first part with admirable respect and intelligence. Obscures the development of the characters and their world and coming, even something beyond in each of the virtues of its predecessor. This second part exceeds or, at least, manages to reach the cinematic quality of the first but, however, this time did not succeed all the favor of the criticism. The public, however, received it with enough enthusiasm and raised 85 million dollars in the United States. I think that the first was as good, nor the second was so bad. I think that both reach a remarkable level and that, really, in addition to repeat in the work of writer, was surprised very positively the work of the own Stallone in the direction, that the truth is that, for 119 minutes that lasts this sequel, we arrived never miss to the director of the first part, John G. Avildsen. Avildsen is an irregular, for many mediocre, which nowadays is practically retired, but that, however, has managed to collect two titles that have changed the lives of millions of viewers of different generations: "Rocky" and "Karate Kid". With both, it has not only managed to fill movie theaters, but it has managed to motivate and to replenish life sports gyms of half the world. I must admit that even I myself came to green belt in karate (or was blue?) (Buff, nor remember already) thanks to this man. Returning to Rocky, can not ignore one of the strong pillars and one of those responsible for the success of the film and that this, thirty years later, is considered as a classic or cult classic, the masterful soundtrack to Bill Conti. The main theme, the song "Gonna Fly Now" is a linked cultural icon of life to the figure of the "Rocky" myth. Conti performed the soundtracks of all the series with the exception of the fourth installment, which on the other hand, under my opinion, was one of the best, influenced no doubt by the musical tastes and rhythms of the 80's, and that exalted and complemented the epic and the fast-paced action of the sequel. In Rocky II, film that came three years later, already 79 and with a Stallone, like his character, exalted in the success and fame, is justified effectively the conflict of the plot. The tape begins where ends the first part and we see Apollo Creed dissatisfied with his restoration of the world title (by points and far-fetched) before, the until then, complete unknown "Italian Colt". Internally, Apollo knows that it is very possible that there is someone better, a true champion, and the shadow and the growing prominence of Rocky torturing him inwardly. The character of Apollo is portrayed by the actor Carl Weathers who deservedly, becomes a prominent niche in this pugilística saga and will always be remembered as such. In this second installment unfolds much of the sincere and beautiful relationship of love between Adrian and Rocky, who after the match asks marriage and they end up marrying happily and by the Church, as a good Italian believer. One of the successes of the saga, is the give a background dramatic outspoken to scripts and offer personal conflicts to each of the characters. Stallone as writer, understands that the antagonist of Rocky, in each one of its challenges, is practically a character as important as the same Boxer. We understand the motivations and conflicts of Apollo, also of Rocky and, in addition, are drawn carefully the characters of Adrian, who in this second installment opposes the match trying to safeguard the health of her husband. The Poli, that poor Devil who is also his brother-in-law, or character of Mickey, the always endearing, and Grump coach Rocky. Women's Rocky becomes pregnant and Rocky is willing to leave boxing and work on what you can to support his family. But Rocky, although it is a very noble person, also is a very basic and uneducated person, and this becomes a problem when it comes to managing the money earned or seeking to work in anything else. From the Apollo environment is pressed to return to combat, but neither his wife nor his coach seem to support the idea. One of the best moments of the series is the scene in the landing of the House of Mickey. Rocky asks to please him return to train and coach shows you, giving you a slap in the face by surprise, that physically already not that suitable for combat. -Do you see it?, you've not even seen him come, right? And that has given it an old old man, what would happen if Apollo catch you several times? -I guess I noquearía. -No, you injure, forever. One of the eyes of Rocky has lost vision. The scene is simply anthology, along with others with some phrases like: "does Adrian, I?" do never you've asked that you stop being a woman, please? Please I ask, do not ask me to my that ceases to be a man "while Apollo ridicules it mercilessly in the media, Rocky was humiliated in the eyes of his coach working anything in the gym this." The situation is painful and excessive provocations, which causes Mickey to change its mind and decides to support him and return to train him. We see then how Rocky says "Sorry" to his wife and begins the hard training. However, Adrian will come to suffer serious health problems that will make endanger his life and that of the child of both. The tension and emotion increase, with a narrative that runs strong and balanced arrives and is perfectly transmitted to the Viewer. Apollo wants revenge, will to crush him, humiliating him and beat his own demons as well. While Apollo is trained very hard, we see a Rocky disheartened and without encouragement to be able to train with dignity, very affected by the plight of his wife. We can feel with anguish as they spend hours, days and as just the time. But this game is also one of the most exciting, sweeping and powerful moments that I've been able to find in a movie. Adrian returns itself, he was born the son, and both seem to finally be out of danger. This Rocky tired, but happy, is father for the first time and is willing to not return to antagonize his wife. It proposes to withdraw, give the match by lost, as appears to be the desire for his wife, but she understood that her husband has the heart of a true Boxer and that they need to fulfill their dream, asks you to do something for her:-want to do something for me. Come. -What. -You win. Vencer you!Then starts the music and training against the clock, and the hairs he put one as hooks. The big moment comes and Stallone has mentalizado its viewers with millimeter accuracy. The match is photographed with agility and a stunning staging and is vibrant and full of epic and excitement. Ëpica is a word that cannot be mentioned when one refers to this saga. Rocky II WINS by K. O, and who writes this criticism is, without any doubt, the best movie of all. Come the 1980s and Stallone, in its full physical and vocational, is about to live his decade of gold. In 1982 he will once again put the gloves and again, writes and directs a third installment in the saga. In the same year, another icon of action cinema, John Rambo in "Rambo", based on the best seller of David Morrell was born "First Blood" and will give standing to another millionaire saga. Rocky III is, the six parties, certainly the funniest and one of the most entertaining. The greatest success, once again, it is the election of his opponent, in this case, an amazing Mr. T (here known as d.) (A series "The A-team"), who takes his role very seriously and manages to create the figure of Clubber Lang, a ruthless, fearsome and brutal Boxer full of hatred. Stallone seems to be aware of that criticism, case of a third party, will not be of any of the forms in their favor, but continues moving tabs with great dexterity. Not ready to give up her formula secret and decides to mix the genres of action and drama. To compensate for them, he knows that he needs to sacrifice some of your chips. And if in the second part the health of Adrian and his son served to manipulate the hearts in it, use the death of the old coach as shock. The film begins with a sympathetic and almost crazy dose of humour which shows how the life of the champion has become a media circus. Includes a display with the then match, yet not so known wrestler Hulk Hogan that at times it is no less surreal. This principle, sometimes, almost humorous, this calculated and measured, to contrast with the dramatic part even with far more impact. In the moments before the match and during a discussion hot with Clubber Lang, Mickey suffered a heart attack, and although Rocky wants to suspend the match, his coach refuses and asks that you combat. In such a situation, Rocky is brutally knocked out and finished the match, in the costumes Mickey dies in her arms, believing that this has won the contest. Boxing is a sport respectful, noble and men and in Rocky III, will be Apollo, thanks to healthy admiration for who knew how win with heart and honestly and fairly, who, along with Adrian and Poli, ally to Rocky in difficult times. The training scenes and two fighting Clubber Lang, back to a great height, and this third installment returns to satisfy the general public. Rocky III becomes the film highest grossing of the three, surpassing the 125 million dollars in the United States. This third delivery, and contrary to what many people think, is for me an admirable sequel, exciting, vibrant, entertaining, with really unforgettable scenes and new musical themes such as "Eye of the tiger", which will remain forever in the history of the cinema and importantly involved in the greatness of the legend of the boxer from Philadelphia. We arrived in 1985. Stallone has just released the second highest grossing film of the year in United States (after "back to the future" by Robert Zemeckis), "Rambo, cornered II" which, on the other hand, and thanks to their dose of gratuitous violence, get sweeping Awards Razzie worst films in almost all sections, including worst picture, worst actor, and worst screenplay. Something under my humble opinion, certainly unfair if we take into account that it is a fairly correct Ribbon of military action. Times change and the prototype of heroes and villains also. The 1980s and the testosterone and fascistoid violence sells and works. Stallone can not avoid some mutation between their two most famous characters. Just as it does in Rambo II, in Rocky IV decided to largely ignore the social and dramatic part in the storyline in favor of pure action. And again as a writer and in the work of direction, get overcome again beating the third box office record. Rocky IV stands with the title of "The sports highest grossing film in history". Again get to tune the right notes and this is thanks in large part to find an attractive antagonist and live up to its predecessors. Ivan Drago, starring Dolph Lundgren, is a professional boxer from the former Soviet Union trained in futuristic art and facilities with the help of banned anabolic substances that give almost superhuman qualities. A perfect and programmed sportsman with the sole intention of humiliating the American Champion in half of the so-called cold war. This time, Stallone sacrificed a new piece, Drago fulminates and causes death in the ring to an unsuspecting Apollo who, out of nostalgia, decides to return to the ring. A stylish something more videoclipero than the previous ones, partly following the fashion of the 80 (mythical scene with Apollo Creed dressed as "Uncle Sam" and dancing with the "Living in America" James Brown) and dispensing used dialogs and the moralistic moments of the previous, Rocky IV is undoubtedly one of sports films of action more effective and adrenalíticas of the history of the cinema, and I know that it has been used, more than once, to motivate athletes of many parts prior to their sports enfrenamientos. Rocky IV, although it away style and claims much more artistic and sober style of the original, is a jewel of the entertainment and action and a real classic of the early 1980s. Him despite who gets upset. To Stallone, however, entered you the doubts with the Decade of the nineties. It seemed to be conscious, along with other actors like Arnold Schwarchenegger, that viewers gradually began to claim a change and new formulas. Heroes more sophisticated and somewhat less flat. The saga of Rocky had already given everything of themselves and Stallone felt that it was best to turn in his career. Shortly before failing a new facet as comedian with two absurdities as "Oscar" and "high or my mother shoots", Stallone decides to complete the saga of Rocky in the 1990s with a last, was even seriously tempted to let die to the hero. Returns the command in the direction to Avildsen, the director of the original, and tries to rescue the dramatic course of the first deliveries. But this time, by a total lack of clarity in their purposes and by attempting to modernize formula, this fails completely. Rocky V not only is the worst movie in the series, in light of all the previous years, but brings absolutely nothing new and only get to denigrate the fantastic character that exalted him into fame in one fell swoop. With a non-existent address, a script regrettable, boring, absurd and up anytime over one grotesque and ridiculous dialogue, Stallone, sacrificed a Rocky apuntillando addition to the worst and most unfortunate interpretation of his entire career. This time, the figure of Rocky is unbearable. He wanders without sense as a memo tarado uncontainable verbiage, that manages to fall ill for the first time and get rile anyone. And in this way, a saga that had resisted with dignity the tastes and preferences of almost two whole decades crashed miserably in the 1990s, garnering the worst reviews possible, failing completely to his followers and giving a more than sound bump at the box office. This desproposito by the lack of faith and decision, and without wishing it, seemed to be the worst end the myth of Rocky deserved. But in this 2007 premiered Rocky Balboa, this time Yes the final chapter of the saga. They have had to spend 17 years, 30 years since the first Rocky, so a Stallone with 60 years of age, try again to rescue the saga of the well and try to complete it as this deserves. Stallone has emerged very touched from the Decade of the nineties, years that have only demonstrated its growing professional decline, failure after failure, with films such as "Driven", "D-Tox", "Angelo Avengin", Taxi 3, Spy Kids 3D, and a large number of mediocre titles that departed it from the success. Rocky Balboa returns to drink directly from the same source as the first deliveries, and if those we had a loner slob who dreamed out of anonymity and succeed a against the clock as a boxer, in this we have a Rocky retired an old veteran who confronts the last quarter of his life as a famous former boxer and widower. Adrian has died of cancer, and Rocky runs a restaurant named where entertains the customers with their old war stories. The truth is that we cannot compare his personal life with own character and, in this case, your physical appearance and your current professional situation, play in favour and partly supported the credibility of what is set out in this latest film. I say partly, because we also believe that a sixty year old man receives the opportunity to fight against heavyweight champion. Although well is true that this already was almost equally unlikely in that first film in the 1970s. Stallone is conscious that, despite all their efforts, their physical power is no longer a credible and effective weapon as it once was to get offer generous dose of entertainment. Therefore decides to better concentrate seriously on the dramatic and emotional side which gives most of the footage. This time, it uses a new and powerful weapon, the nostalgia perfectly. Stallone returns to write a screenplay with craft, MIME and honesty and shows us a Rocky in its decadent phase, lonely, aging and melancholic. Rocky survives clinging to the memory of his wife and to the memory of the past, which as it is well known, were always better. Stallone, well aware of the very personal character of this project and risk taking that was the idea to embody a Rocky last and after 17 long years of absence, decides to again control the product closely and, once again, is himself who returns to perform the work of direction. This is a true success. In addition, also decides to return to work once, with a modest budget, this time for $ 24 million. The sub-plots and conflicts of the characters surrounding a Rocky in this installment are overly schematic subject a bit with pins, but fulfil its function and fail to disrupt history. I, first and foremost, highlight the scene of Rocky and poly in the factory of meat, where Rocky opens "stark" his heart, with tears in his eyes, in a genuine and really exciting monologue. Not so lucky is the final, with a training filmed with the Office of the experience, but extremely fleeting. It is missing the watch as a man of his age, struggling to return to pick up the form. Stiffness, dizziness, that aforementioned calcification of joints. Feel the countdown, the fear of ridicule, not keep up, the fear of embarrassment offer a regrettable show or be seriously injured. There is a non-existent tension dramatically and, at a stroke, we are a Rocky already in the ring. Mason Dixon is also the worse drawn and weakest in the series antagonist. Seems to discourage the power, in part to help the credibility of the whole or, perhaps, because it is no longer necessary no continuity or excessive character depth to deal with the last chapter. For all these reasons, we do not reach the combat so motivated as us were accustomed in previous clashes, and this is a too heavy burden. The match, on the other hand, nor get to reach the desired spectacle is, by far, and without the grotesque Street skirmish with Tommi Gunn in the forgettable fifth installment, made worse of all. Is foreshadow some good intentions, but the decor is pretty mediocre and the Assembly as the realization, are quite unfortunate. The modern winks and the intended style coolest of times that run with a videoclipera Edition and confusing, the show considerably impoverished. And if not, to review any of the brutal fighting of any of the previous movies. I guess that open levels and more classical installation of previous decades, show too much physical deficiencies of the Mise en scène of Sylvester Stallone today. A real shame and a great lost opportunity, the last, for after a fantastic first part of film, have been able to offer us the best installment of the saga. However, in general terms, Stallone recreates an honest, fair and exciting final chapter, with a unequivocally circular character, to reinforce the sense of roundness of a saga that has meant everything in his life. And if fortune and a broken hand (the contender for the title which was to face 30 years ago Apollo) he was then awarded the opportunity of his life and the beginning of a dream, the expected end it provides now another break by hand. In Rocky Balboa, during the match, the first of change, Dixon splits the hand with an unfortunate blow to the hip of Rocky, who are thus reduced their usual abilities in the ring, and what, on the other hand, the opportunity to a brave veteran as Rocky, match the disadvantage and give the show to stand stoically and with honor all assaults the young champion. Rocky lose points, already did that first time against Apollo, but morally, will return to win as did it then. Everything ends as it began, and entire generations of viewers have been able to grow and mature as direct witnesses of the life of a good man, a true hero done likewise. Rocky Balboa is a film of remarkable quality that closes the series with great dignity and is also a right and well-deserved tribute to the figure of Rocky and its creator. Stallone has achieved, thirty years more later, return to meet again with much of the criticism. Meanwhile, the public is responding as almost always faithfully and passionate and Rocky Balboa this being a success at the box office. Thanks Stallone and thanks Rocky, thanks to both, for giving us, nothing more and nothing less than a lifetime captured on celluloid. A life full of good values, sorrows and joys, real moments and, above all, of so many, so many emotions. I, in return, can only write me, until now, most extensive and detailed critique, written from the respect, admiration and from the heart of those who, like so many millions of viewers around the world, he laughed, cried and shouted for so many years at your side. |
1,720 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2941 | Jeremy Fox | Los Simpson: La Película | 3 | 5 | muchocine | You can be considered as a long (and fun) episode of the series. | Just finished the first season broadcast on Spain, my opinion was that it was one of the best series in the history of television.Time has shown that I had fallen short. Because "The Simpsons" is also one of the most important series in influential in the history of television.For the same reason, the idea of transfer to theaters the formula that worked so well in the small screen has been a constant temptation to those responsible for the series. A temptation which were waged for lack of the appropriate script, of sufficient desire, of the needing or, simply, value.Finally, in 2007 comes "the Simpsons: the movie" ("The Simpsons Movie"), whose importance in the history of the cinema is far than it already is in the field of television. In fact, and to give an example, stays away from the level of the "South Park" movie, rather than in my opinion.The fundamental problem is that television and film are different means, each of them with its own language and its characteristic tempo. Put another way, the formula that works on television doesn't why work in the film.In this way, although the movie is quite funny (laughs are insured) and entertaining during his 87-minute, his pace is not appropriate and, on this particular point, does not stand for a moment the comparison with "Ratatouille", competitor at the box office here in Spain. Me left with the question of if the assessment would have been different from the film have been released in 1989, before that nobody had never seen a single episode of the series. But what I have no doubt is that, seen now, her can be considered as one episode of the series, with the difference that lasts three times than usual.The Simpsons had deserved something more but, seen the impoverished level of film for this year, I think we can (or must) be satisfied.Final evaluation of moonfleet.es: 6 out of 10. |
1,721 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1694 | Iñaki Bilbao | 300 | 3 | 5 | muchocine | I had really well, but not it surprised me absolutely nothing to see with total tranquility and stillness. So I think that I not take much to forget her. | Entertaining epic, framed in the Péplum, as the rating of the illustrious Spain Rafael in his excellent book: "The Peplum." "Old film".It is not a remake of "The lion of Sparta", very nice film directed by Rudolph Maté in 1961, with Richard Egan protagonist, but the famous and excellent comic of Frank Miller.Y it shows, for good and for evil.It must be made clear that, at least in my opinion, gets very good time because it contains everything that it could and should expect: spectacular, violence, heroism, love, loyalties, friendships, betrayals, and also doses of sadism and cruelty. It handles everything pretty well Snyder, which already had dazzled us in his previous work "The dawn of the dead", film already cult following among lovers of horror movies.Here, in "300", the narrative has, as you might expect, as important as the visual work. This aspect, its careful and painstaking scenery, is of vital importance, because everything is dependent on it.The picture of different colors depending on the events and hours which happen events, syncopated Assembly and the artistic direction, they want and I think that they do greatly, be faithful to the original, the work of Miller. And it is there where, perhaps, is the only negative point of the film, which does not depart almost nothing of the comic, so it loses some freshness and, above all, originality and imagination. I think it should, at least have to try, create something new that was strictly film and wasn't nearly a calque from the world of cartoons, very attractive to this outside.But leaving this aside, at the end and after an opinion is absolutely subjective, the tape taste with pleasure, provided that like the epic stories full of blood, sweat and tears.Takes his time to reach the battle of Thermopylae Las and the characters believe that they are well developed, although certain historical aspects shine by their absence when aren't strangers, and even little credible.As to the character of Dillios told his countrymen at the end of the film a year has passed (that thought understood) from the famous battle of the 300 and now again to see the faces with the numerous Persian army. However, agreement, but. what has been done since this cruel army? where has it been stuck? Do remain arms crossed waiting for the Greek armies is feet?. I don't know, something does not block me.As for the music, in the family scenes, note a lot the influence of "Gladiator". So I think that it is very nearly a plagiarism.But well, I had frankly well, but not it surprised me absolutely nothing to see with total tranquility and stillness. So I think that I not take much to forget her.With regard to the controversy that has arisen in Iran, ancient Persia, I don't know the exact reason why be angry. Seems to be that it is because it portrays them as too cruel and evil. If so, I think that it is not for both. Also the Spanish, English, estadounidensee, French, German, Russian, Japanese...etc, etc, be them has retratato as well in other films.In what it could have been enfandado a bit is in the frasecita of Dillios at the end of the film, where it says something and that we must end with the Persians and thus its mysticism and I do not know what else more. That about mysticism, of course, is harvest of the times. An opinion with which many will agree, but we should understand that he can touch noses and other parts of the body to a number of human beings, for example to the current Iranians. Or maybe not. |
1,722 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2976 | Andrés Pons | La Jungla 4.0 | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Action scenes without respite with an actor in the form despite the passing of the years, with a strong script, is a genuine enjoyment back to feel the misadventures of the genial character back in action but with less hair and more wrinkles. | Apparently the nostalgic are in luck at the new tendency of Hollywood to recover the heroes of action of yesteryear.Stallone which desempolva his characters who owes the Fame "Rocky and Rambo" in dates will be Harrison Ford incarnating back to the great Jones.Tal Indiana as I see it; It can be at times projects to revive the career of the star of turn, because whatever so it is appreciated.McLane was always one of my favorite characters for his impropriety, his lips always pronouncing tacos to one hundred per hour and able to put in the worst trouble leaving pimping so graceful.Bruce Willis returns with his most celebrated character from the hand of the director of Underworld that is right to give the point of yesteryear with the same techniques of action aside from technological advances.Action scenes without respite with an actor in the form despite the passing of the years, with a strong script, is a genuine enjoyment back to feel the misadventures of the genial character back in action but with less hair and more wrinkles.To give you a but I did not like the interpretation of the bad "Timothy Olyphant" known thanks to the series Deadwood than at any time this at the height of the charisma of previous villains as for example Jeremy Irons. 8. |
1,723 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3023 | Francisco Bellón | ¿Y tú Quién Eres? | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Y tú Quién Eres? It is a sentimental, tear and overly sweetened melodrama that is right at the bottom, but fails miserably in the form. | Semantically, there is no big difference between both words, but is not the same be timely to be opportunistic. Life is full of people and appropriate things, although unfortunately abound more opportunists. Films also happens this same, there are some who come at the right time to open or continue a debate in society, and there are also taking advantage of certain circumstances, good or bad, to seek a better reception or commercial career.And that a film as Y tú Quién Eres? , whose title and gives many clues about the development of the same release day world against Alzheimer's is a tremendous and shameless tasteless. It is justice that tell a story about one of the worst evils that have arisen in the last century and especially victims who suffer and suffer, directly or indirectly, but also is true that a history of deep depth and significance should be told with more tact and sensitivity, and not become a cheap melodrama. Very little remains of Antonio Mercero addressed to the cabin, and if her previous film, fourth floor, already sinned soft, in Y tú Quién Eres? It launches full childish sentimentality and the easy tear. The film lacks dignity and respect and spare you the sentimentality and the edulcoramiento of Mercero. The script is full of clichés, with some rancid dialogues and some even more acartonados characters and absurd situations. Emphasizes negatively the family character of Cristina Brondo, with the character of the father to the head. Obviously the actors are all very well, with a Manuel Alexandre and a José Luis López Vázquez doing brilliant work without any effort and in spite of the script. Well Cristina Brondo, able to stand on the same footing with these two monsters of the interpretation. Y tú Quién Eres? It is a sentimental, tear and overly sweetened melodrama that is right at the bottom, but fails miserably in the form. And Antonio Mercero should have shown more respect before addressing an issue of such magnitude as Alzheimer's sufferers and their families. |
1,724 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4306 | Ana Belén Pacheco | The Jane Austen Book Club | 2 | 5 | muchocine | If someone has the higadillo endure nearly two hours attacked women discussing life and love with the background of the novels of Jane Austen (basically complaining about it) then later. | A group of five women: a divorcee expert, a lesbian, a frustrated married, one in separation process and another with serious problems to the commitment decide to meet once a month to make one of these clubs of books that both like the Americans. The object of reading will be the work of so of fashion Jane Austen what need a sixth member as each chooses one of the novels and host one of the meetings. Six books, six months and six appointments. Each of them will have a curious parallel with the characters of the novels who choose. That is the common thread. The unsuspecting sixth will be a handsome young man who rides on bike and is assiduous reader of science fiction invited by one of them to help her friend on full separation to forget her husband and that will obviously lead to the romantic entanglement of this as linear plot.I am not a faithful reader of Jane Austen. Not so much at least as the protagonists of this film are able to devour the chivalrous novels by English author over and over again. I recognize that of his six books I have read (some more than once) more than half but I do not consider header books why in the middle of talks was so lost cone character Grigg, which, in fact, found me the only thing decent and entertaining the tape.Otherwise if someone has the higadillo endure nearly two hours of targeted women discussing the life and love (basically complaining about it) then later. For the rest of mortals who have not decided to do a master's degree on the female philosophy since the 19th century to the present day, well will ignore this tape and cease to be seduced by the young Jane Austen, sense and sensibility, pride and prejudice, Emma, Masfield Park and persuasion (the sixth, that with "a title with some Abbey" as my friend shiny new Dancy is my weak point and not even know that it will) in their large or small screen versions; Another option is to devour the books in order to keep some of the illustrative club meetings of readers of the tape before us (which is a great effort that honestly does not deserve) and the final option is to directly go to the website of the film before and study well the synopsis and characters in books that explain divinely (and also link with little shame with wikipedia)(, indisputable source of universal knowledge). |
1,725 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1219 | Yojimbo | La ciudad perdida | 5 | 5 | muchocine | One more than remarkable film and an outstanding debut that unfortunately has gone unnoticed by the Billboard. The very best of the year. | "Works" are a litmus test. The directors are "sentenced" according to his first work. More curiosity they wake up if they are actors stuck to filmmakers. And may be qualified in a broad range of adjectives: promising, bland, genial? However I would add another adjective that defines this and other two films as A franco, 14 pesetas or the second movie of Zambrano, Habana Blues: felt.The stories that have an autobiographical touch, written and filmed with enough talent, are able to touch the sensitivity of the viewer and give the feeling that everything that is told, although he has not lived, has been real.Andy García, born in Cuba and exiled when Castro came to power, has wanted to make their particular tribute to his distant land through the story of a family that well could be yours. With a writer of exception: the late Guillermo Cabrera Infante. It is a pity that this film has taken so long to arrive in our country.The story Fellove family, wealthy and businesses in a Cuba ruled by the also dictator Batista. Within the family there are rebellious children who want a change in the country and advocate the golpismo of Fidel Castro and many other "revolutionary" factions. However Fico (Garcia), will always be on the side of his family, for better or for worse. And the family, as Batista leaving the country, begins to destroy Cuba. The character of Garcia reminds a little of Rick in Casablanca. And it is not a comparison that reste le points, of course.Although the synopsis sounds a little topical and sosa, hides a passionate and exciting film. It has an enviable cast in which spare Inés (Sastre, off the spectator of history of). Noteworthy García and infant given to Bill Murray one of the best of his career and the film characters. Without a doubt. It is humorous and almost "unreal" counterpoint in this story. But it's great and manages to raise the bar in the film.Make a movie felt also consists of wet historically, as it is the case. The film exudes tropical heat, catchy rhythms and a few recreations of characters and very successful historical situations. Nor let pass a figure as Ché, the another Fidel Castro frustrated. It may be that nothing progressive and idolized portrait of the "liberator" (jua) take back some. We already know to what.One more than remarkable film and an outstanding debut that unfortunately has gone unnoticed by the Billboard. The very best of the year. |
1,726 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3237 | Iñaki Bilbao | First Snow (La primera nevada) | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Intesante film of fantastic intrigue, which as it happens with some snowfall, fails curdle. | Quite interesting on paper, it contains all the elements to make it a pleasant, very entertaining tape. However, it is not so.It has, as I say, very attractive cinematographic elements for the general public: intrigue, thriller elements, anytime a touch of fantasy but the thing not curdled conveniently, I believe that because of the inexperience of its director.The idea is good, no doubt, but its resolution images becomes a product without much force, rather slow, and stands almost entirely in the remarkable interpretation of Guy Pearce, who composed his difficult character with style, mixing the sobriety with dramatic violence (the fullness of his obsession). Therein lie all the frames and it is the soul of the history.But if it were not for him, the shebang, I am afraid, is come down relatively easily.This is so because all distant and something cold, except for the final part, where all House in the determination, the road will finally choose the protagonist. This part is very human and contains hassta tenderness, not exempt of melancholy. But to achieve this we have to follow a story that for the sake of the screenplay is something dark and not get motivate in excess, rather on the contrary, makes the viewer follow everything calmly, without azorar it, without feeling more than mere human curiosity about how Earth will end all. And ends rather disappointingly. I refer to the last sentence you hear. A sentence that concludes a story that is more than clear that it should have been given much more than Yes.In summary, which does not bored, has some good dialogues and something (little) humor, as well as an excellent Guy Pearce, but am not convinced and very well can be disappoint. |
1,727 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2276 | Iñaki Bilbao | Bajo las estrellas | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Best thing is its first third, something more, where we can attend a fun and perfect psychological study of the various characters. Estimable first job in the film of Felix Viscarret. | Good first job in film directed by Felix Viscarret, who had already given samples of his talent in some short-covering letter, Fernando Trueba gave him his first opportunity as a director in a long.Here adaptable bastente Fernando Aramburu's novel, "The trumpeter of the Utopia", mixing comedy and drama harder in a attractive and emotional way although, in my opinion, not entirely convincing.It has many positive elements that makes this film a very estimable work more taking into account that it is the first work of its young director. But it must be said that the irregularity in its rhythm and situations are that it is unbalanced.The best thing is its first third, something more, where we can attend a fun and perfect psychological study of the various characters, especially of its displaced protagonist, a highly imperfect man but with a nose and joy of life undisturbed.Viscarret manages to show the weaknesses and strengths of a number of people, who try to be happy, although life imposed on them over and over again even insurmountable and challenging tests. During its first third comedy takes over history, which may not be tougher, but to be filled with funny dialogues and jocular manners situations, arouse the sympathy of the spectator, that enough laughs and smiles at all times.However, its final third is a dramón with fear, well narrated cinematically, but makes it descompense a bit the final result, that it remains good, but, at least to me, left me a small sediment of dissatisfaction, apparently I that rhythm and narrative intensity decaría somewhat.This is not obstacle to appreciate this movie, which I consider to be, in time, the best Spanish to date, inter alia by heartfelt interpretations, especially of Alberto San Juan, which is immeasurable, and the music, very appropriate. |
1,728 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1829 | Rafa Ferrer | Paris je t'aime | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Recommended for all those who have been in Paris at least once in life. | Set in Paris, both in that part of the city that we know all the tourists, as in that part they only know the Parisian citizens, this film composed of small scraps of stories, featuring thousand familiar faces (Steve Buscemi, Leonor Watling, Natalie Portman, Javier Cámara, Sophie Marceau, Willem Dafoe, Nick Nolte, Bob Hoskins, Elijah Wood.) and directed by a thousand names of cinemacomposed in their own way, each a story that blurs and draw at the same time the city of love.Some brief, very brief, others more long, some comic, others tragic, one of terror, other passion, but always with the thread of the eternal city's Fund, leaves a good taste in mouth and the feeling that in just a few minutes. You can say and tell big things.Recommended for all those who have been in Paris at least once in life. |
1,729 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2677 | Kiko de España | Feast | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Feast is wild, riotous, dirty, violent, funny and black like a donkey balls. | Well, most wild laughter I stick to watching this SAVAGERY of the year 2005. John Gulager directed the movie after be winner of any Edition (I think that the third) of Project Greenlight, a species of O.T. to "filmmakers" winner makes a movie that produce types those you see in the poster and that they are responsible for maintain also the reality, but that is what less I am interested in.Feast is wild, riotous, dirty, violent, funny and black like a donkey balls.Are you can lend on face B budget sometime, but that only if you're an idiot.Quite horny and nasty monsters (come on, folladores) are going to do the impossible for a group of unhappy life.The first 20 minutes, at the height of the Carpenter vampires. The photo is italosetentera and chunga and Henry Rollins makes me descojone. Jason Jay Mewes also leaves. The presentations of the characters are very horny. I you me her beady. |
1,730 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/379 | Rafa Marin | Alatriste | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Where there could be five films or series of interesting television we exhibited a showcase of scenes full of holes that might fill one day. | Let us recall once again the first law of William Goldman: the films are structure, and that structure is different and independent to the structure of a novel or a play. This structure must be above the literal adaptation of a book, that that is the style now, with the mania of being faithful to points and commas and minor characters and actions of filling, or, as it is done upstream in Alatriste, adapting in one movie several books at the same time (, I nor I do not understand why kills thus the goose that lays the golden eggs).And that is the great defect has, like movie, Alatriste. He fails the structure, and to fail the structure, the pieces do not intermarry as they should. Storytelling is, thus, deslavazada, suggesting too and telling little: we skip of the highlights of a book to the next, and leave you hanging scenes that are key to understanding the motivations of the characters, the historic surroundings, court intrigue: is a ride by the most emotive moments of the books, but full of holes which is whyThey lowered the great everyday gestures than the own Alatriste or wars colleagues and misfortunes are living: the suicide of the Portuguese, stabbing aboard the ship, economic sacrifice of Sebastian, the inability to release the accused sentenced to death, charges of Spy to Iñigo. In that look to the novels, we are also left with the desire to know something more of all these historical characters that appear as padding, making cameos of themselves and cameos of actors (too popular) that embody: the great camera Javier making count-Duke of Olivares (a point to admit that I always had seen him in the role of Góngora)(, who looks more), and the no less large Juanjo Echanove portraying a bitter and quarrelsome Quevedo, characterized so excessively that it seems almost a caricature of the poet.Therefore, neither Malatesta has the strength which should, nor the episode with the Duke of Buckingham importance later in the plot (as long as you cut the development of that episode). Angelica is practically well in the film, as long as it does not convey any idea of femme fatale and Elena Anaya performance not puts it above any pilinguilla number of institutes. Ariadna Gil makes Maria de Castro, a role that in another time would have fallen in Ana Belén. but Ariadna is not Ana Belén, I fear.They say that Arturo Pérez-Reverte, happy father, demanded that the film was shot in Spanish, for what that no one imagined Quevedo or own Alatriste speaking in another language. Interesting proposal which, from the outset, closes the doors to the export of the film more expensive cinema Spanish, as they have stressed us by active and passive since it began shooting, and perhaps even some nomination to the Oscar to the great Viggo Mortensen, which outboard his role (remedando poses of the own Pérez-Reverte?) Although his character does not dominate many times history as it shouldboth times the film becomes too much coral and steals too many minutes of prominence. Mortensen makes what can, and do well, hiding his South American accent, but unfortunately can not say the same damn direct sound and the declamativa capacity of the actresses, who does not understand half the time and it recite everything with the same College tonillo: is shameful that the beautiful Pilar López de Ayala has just four lines of dialogue and the four tell them evil. Nor means that the Inquisitor Bocanegra is interpreted by a woman who is recognized as Blanca Portillo at all times and whose voice is not camouflaged.The film thus becomes long because it is giving stumbled. The great moments (that is) are very diluted in a narrative that stretches: is an episodic film where the narrative jumps, paradoxically, fill her deadlocks. Despite its cost, noticeable gaps: the assault on the ship has already on deck, without that let us look at the boats climb aboard; the galleys with little conviction rema Iñigo are a closed set that even ranges and whose boat also obscures. Impeccable, historical reconstruction and lighting, suffer from the lack of a general plan to show us from the air the Madrid of the time. Very well choreographed and quite realistic to sword duels, although perhaps it has an excess of degüellos throughout the film (follow you account, because I lost).I said: that where there could be five films or series of interesting television we displayed a sample of scenes full of holes that might fill one day, as saying, "look what we do if stop us doing so". I am curious to see how the film at the Spanish box office and, above all, beyond our borders, which will be the only place where the pasta invested in this project can be recovered. |
1,731 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/677 | Bloody Will | Infiltrados | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Infiltrators can be catalogued as arrogance. Superb direction, superb script and superb performances. | If Martin Scorsese fails no statuette this year by "Infiltrators", I delete the Oscar. The magnetic influence that they get the films of this director, when it pleases, they currently have very few equivalents. We can say that a director x made x good films. "Scorsese confirms me after seeing this film that is able to be attributed the better film career of 50 years, and I am not exaggerating at all.""Taxi Driver", "Wild Bull" and "The Cape of fear" sat precedents that so chaotic and dirty way to rolling. "One of ours" and "Casino" are two of the five tips for Mafia perfection with the trilogy of "The godfather". "Jo, that night" is a nearly perfect comedy, and "The age of innocence" taught us that it can also be romantic. Gather all the best parts of this list and have "Infiltrators", a film that will not find any but.Stating that I have not seen "Infernal Affairs", which Scorsese has made a remake or version, or rather I dunno, because after seeing "Infiltrators" me has antojado a huge curiosity by its original Asian, which I doubt has the closest that the argument based. "I have the impression that Scorsese has endorsed more than any other film so left as mere anecdote.""Infiltrated" can be catalogued as arrogance. Superb direction, superb script and superb performances. Of "Gangs of New York" expected me more, but never like me at all. "The Aviator" also failed in the set. This film, where you remain more than two hours hooked to a story of cops and robbers with personalities and most spectacular gifts of recent times is so great why.The hstoria is the best microbial for the mind of the Italian-American director. Two guys who finish the formation of the Boston police, although one of them (Matt Damon) will use his position to alert major capo of the city, Frank Costello (Jack Nicholson), who looks like his father, of all the movements of the body. In turn, the other (Leonardo DiCaprio), it comes from a cursed family, must undertake the difficult task of being the mole within the ranks of Costello. His works entrecruzarán until that the situation only allows the unmasking of one or another.Let the main: Matt Damon signed his best performance in his entire career, and already I would empower Bourne of the personality and strength gives him his corrupt COP character. Scorsese has become a ca ** to which admire with all your soul, by the coldness that is his sneak, and persuasion that uses with his superiors. His final actions are consistent with his soul. Leonardo DiCaprio is sensational, and finally sees the word "Scorsese" on his forehead after the failed "Gangs" and "Aviator". Acojonado at times and uncontrolled in others, can say without any doubt that his best performance was pulled out the tite Marty. Awesome from beginning to end. Attention to the scene of the shabby shop. Scorsese 100%.Jack Nicholson is another world. A piece of son of ** those that Scorsese is only able to draw. Amoral, without feelings, without confidence, violent, sadistic and sarcastic. It gives the best moments of the film, both dramatic and comic. I see with the statuette in the hands, because there is an actor that has left so much this year. Worth the movie just to see him.The side left to become genuine pillars of action. Martin Sheen perfect, irreconociblemente special Mark Whalberg and Alec Baldwin in the best of his life: and give him a beating the ducks turn poli. A passivity."Infiltrators" the genus of the mobsters reaches its cúlmen, with shows that charge is Scorsese. Nasty violence but that can not stop looking at. Each punch on the screen is a bite of lips in the armchair, no one knows if by asco or desire to participate you also. And maybe an end of anxiety where you discover that the director does not have to be conventional. For what if it has never been. Long life whom you touch, that the King is Scorsese. |
1,732 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2552 | José A. Peig | El vuelo del navegante | 1 | 5 | muchocine | If one believed that this is a good movie, all blame it on the hormones. Watch it now has the same value and meaning as the magdalena of Proust: a powerful evocation of what we felt and we were in the 1980s, sitting on the couch and rewinding tapes with VHS. | A while ago a reader of this notebook made us the suggestion I talk of this film, a small sample of the family film of the 1980s, of which many people (which now has twenty-five years of age onwards) keeps a very good memory of insurance because we saw in the early childhood and preadolescence and few things are as evocative (and misleading) as memory and its imaginative potential.Directed by Randal Kleiser, is a child of its time, and its merits die beyond this. It premiered in 1986, and comes to be a remake and remix - very akin to the tastes of the era--from classics like "Back to the future" and "E.T". He tells us the "dream" of a child, which travels through outer space aboard an alien spacecraft. When he returns to the Earth - ralentizador effect of the speed of light - eight years have passed and he does not remember anything of what happened. The film, at least respects a few fundamentals of storytelling based on "the journey of the hero", and the transformation it induces in the life of the protagonist. At a metaphorical level, the "dream" of David serves the purpose to reconcile this with his family, especially with his hated brother. The story is told through too simple, often ñoños and stupid, resources with a treatment of the elements into play more like a telefilm that a product which was broadcast in cinemas. A telefilm of pleasant view, no doubt, sympathetic approach to the modern myth of the UFOs and the abductions, some touch of successful humor, ochentera musiquilla of "can" and electrodes and little else. Special effects are a tacky that they sing even at the time of its filming, although the design of the spacecraft is quite successful, with those changes in a manner according to the direction and rhythms of flight.If one believed that this is a good movie, all blame it on the hormones. Watch it now has the same value and meaning as the magdalena of Proust: a powerful evocation of what we felt and we were in the 1980s, sitting on the couch and rewinding tapes with VHS. On his film role, the film is absolute nonsense, not for the story, which as we have already pointed out, started an interesting proposal, but by banal and plumbous the scenery and the characterizations. At the time he had his grace, but it has aged very badly. |
1,733 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2655 | Berto | Los Simpson: La Película | 2 | 5 | muchocine | After all these years of rumours and secrets has the wait been worth? Well not much, actually. And not because the movie is bad, or anything, but because it offers exactly the same as we have been seeing for quite some time. | Among the details of the IMDB is one amazing: the screenplay began writing in 2003, and became 158 drafts. This gives a sample of the secrecy surrounding the premiere of the film on the Simpsons, as well as unclear which was the plot of the movie, that is one thing to tell a story in 20 minutes, and quite another fill and a half hours of footage.In the end, what we see on the screen is a new gaffe of Homer that this time can cost you dearly to Springfield, to the point that the Government decides to make them disappear from the map. Literally. In addition, because of its continuing stupidity and selfishness, Marge, Bart and Lisa just abandoning Homer, which will have to save not only Springfield, but the unit family. After all these years of rumours and secrets has been worth the wait? Well not much, actually. And not because the movie is bad, or anything, but because it offers exactly the same as we have been seeing for quite some time, and so is not easy to justify the hopes of hundreds of thousands of fans of the yellow family.Somewhat strange is also that mixture between 2-D and 3-D has been used in the recreation of Springfield. While it is logical to take the leap into the film to offer more showy funds and other types of frames and effects, it does not seem to be indicated film to impress the staff with technology.That Yes, we must first of all recognize that there is funny scenes and good jokes, but also a basis of trying to make a punch line in every line of dialogue. And Yes, some criticism to the system marks the House simpsoniana undoubtedly also falls, although in the meantime gag it is easy that is ignore. What draws attention is the lightweight who have here the side (less Flanders, of course), many times they take the chapter of rigour, which although they must check out practically everyone except the dead, the vast majority do not have or phrase that say, as for Smithers or the director Skinner.Pero those who have been worse treaties are the protagonists. Homer is so stupid and clumsy in all that it undertakes, that does not cause a smile, but stupor and even some anger. Bart is far from the Nice thug that we know to become a traumatized child, and Lisa ceases to be the moral vertex of the family and does not have the lowest moment of glory. In general, and knowing that it sounds strange, have caricatured a few cartoons.Although perhaps is being unfair, and what happens in the background is that we already have as "openwork" to the Simpsons, that it is impossible to get them something different to usual, and when you try to do something surprising, it loses some of the vital essence of the characters. But it is inevitable to recall one of the first jokes, we hear in the mouth of Homer: "I am astonished that we have paid for something we can see free on TV". What bad timing chose Homer to be right. |
1,734 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/566 | Matías Cobo | Los Borgia | 2 | 5 | muchocine | The film only works as valid testimony of the wanderings of Rodrigo Borgia and its offshoots during the time they landed at the Vatican as a bull in a China shop. | Apparently, not so-called patriotic film we seem to make good historical films. Without so many previous expectations with Alatriste, the disappointment that produced me Los Borgia has not been so capitalized, although the poor result of one and the other is more or less equal. This film directed by Antonio Hernández thinks something very similar which to Elías Yánez: supremely bored during his extensive and unjustified footage of two hours and a half. The film is most flat in the development of a story that could almost qualify for Protocol. Starts from one of the recent events to the once dreaded and powerful family Borgia, now developing an absolute decadence. After being imprisoned Caesar, the eldest son of the now deceased Borgia Pope, the tape back us several years ago, until the coronation of Rodrigo Borgia as Pope Alexander VI. We know, because we have just to make it clear and it's a historical account, that glory newly acquired by this family of Levantine origin would be dispelled by the hatreds and jealousies planted by its members. But leaving the film in the country is its unoriginal way of narrating the events. One can assume that there will be betrayal without scruples, incestuous bed scenes and war vicissitudes, but what is desalodador is cyclic succession of sequences of this type that we are witnessing.Ascension and subsequent sinking of an anxious family of settling scores with the Princes of the neighbouring territories can give to much, even more so when those who star in the action are members of one of the families of nobles more rivers of ink generated between essays and novelados historical stories. But the film, to be good, needs good management of some springs to convey emotion in the Viewer. The dialogues have to be force, images and how it fitted, also, performers have to get into the skin of a character that copper real life thanks to his work. The most obvious things, but that, if they fail as a whole, they make the viewing of a film tasteless. And this happens to Los Borgia, another national film premiered with the bells have been expensive? 10 million euros? and count on outstanding actors of our cinema. By the way, my attention how media have both excelled in Alatriste as Los Borgia the many millions of euros that have cost both productions; as if millionaires disbursements ensured the quality and artistic success.Note that they have spent the money on costumes, filming in exterior and Interior which ambientaran the time, in the few minutes of footage of war scenes, and the result is convincing in this regard. Luxury and pomp of the Vatican facilities is very well portrayed, but the battles sequences are an I want to and I can not. With levels very closed and without great luxuries in the camera movements, these scenes well could have been removed; total, if the film goes over the atrocities perpetrated by the Borgia family from the powerful armchair papal than of anything else. Some of what you give good they have continuous intrigue and gossip of alcove, used with insistent repetition in the tape. Ultimately, the film only works as valid testimony of the wanderings of Rodrigo Borgia and its offshoots during the time they landed at the Vatican as a bull in a China shop. |
1,735 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/230 | Silvia | Mios, tuyos y nuestros | 2 | 5 | muchocine | With a final and a totally predictable plot development, the comic tone of the tape only arises from the spectacular falls of the characters. | With an argument more widespread than a public water (with forgiveness), the film presents the problems that arise when a couple marries and their respective children are forced to live together. Compounding the problem in this case is that it's an overly large family (the mother has 10 children: biological 4 more adopted 6-8 fr.). The conflict of coexistence is evidente.¿No you remember the plot of numerous Spanish series Los Serrano or family physician? I do not know to fund the panorama of American television series but I guess it's a recurrent plot in fiction when there is a lack of ideas. With a final and a totally predictable plot development, the comic tone of the tape only arises from the spectacular falls of the characters or the Pringle with liquids of disgusting appearance.And if, the film is littered with topics (as daughter Chinese or Japanese obsessed with the photograph), and scenes that resemble other films as the naval captain that educates their children with the righteousness of his profession ("smiles and tears"). This righteousness of the father collides with educational freedom proposed by the mother. The guys come together despite their differences against their common enemy: his parents, and organize a strategy to separate them. Perhaps the only emotional scene worth is the lighthouse that develops when the movie finishes (do not follow to not crush the end nobody) the rest are a series of sequences that plunge sharply towards a predictable and watered-down end. |
1,736 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1361 | Yojimbo | Princesas | 2 | 5 | muchocine | The day that we know make this quality and invoice but not many movies?Queens? and?Princesses? It should be a double celebration, because people will go to see more movies Spanish and at the same time less propaganda. | This is the first time I scored things during a film screening: didn't forget any detail to discuss it here.To start going with great suspicion to see the new film by Ken Loach Spanish. Sorry for the comparison, but himself is become that, is not a nickname say you hate. In fact the director is who seems to hate the world in the living and the living to make their social complaints. And it seems that it uses marginal as allies for their ideological frustrations to explain in his films.To begin with, the script remains committed to crucify and condemn in the most absolute hell to their "heroines". And the hell he is responsible for well, reflect in some situations of true form (for example, sequences in the Casa de Campo with license plates of cars hidden under a pixel). And Don Fernando is responsible for not giving their protagonists escape chance. And perfectly exemplifies it the definition of "Princess" who gives the character of Candela Peña all prostitutes apart from fascists are victims. The character of Candela Peña noble intends to enlarge the breasts. But implies that it is temporary. That should be his lie, because a character who has a goal clear but have to do something horrible would like to leave it with the utmost urgency. And this is not the case.The character of Micaela Nevárez is the more credible as a Dominican without papers to which he is not forced to prostitution. But it also acts as a "praying mantis".The trouble with pamphleteering film is there who creates them.And they don't separate any favors who portrays.And in this case, as De Aranoa want to dignify them and turn them into heroines (makes a parallel on Superman better used than in Kill Bill 2), not only write philosophical phrases that loose when it comes to coffee table about God and life, but that also puts them of teachers of sexuality (trembles Lorena Berdún) or introduces some enviable character within the profession, as the darling of any Minister who gives them a limousine ride.There is no shortage of stories not developed (like candle and Micaela) with their "boyfriends" that could Suomi director's ideological discourse.But importantly, the good thing about the film, which are a couple of things: the actresses and the Mise en scène. This time Fernando León has dared to take the camera on his shoulder and makes it a less stiff staging. The actresses are award, and it will be highlight discoveries of Antonio Durán Morris and Llum Barrera as excellent side.The film can also count on the privilege that Manu Chao has composed a song for the movie "Call Me Street", play on words almost worthy of Medem. Resumiendo, the day we can make movies of this quality and invoice but not so many "Queens" and "Princess" will have to do a double celebration, because people will go to see more movies Spanish and at the same time less propaganda. |
1,737 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3736 | Rafa Ferrer | Café solo... o con ellas | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Spend 2 hours of your time to read anything, from a Kafka to the mark last week, but!God don't waste their time in such crappy! (let case for once in his life). | Complain about how bad that works Spanish cinema, us tear vestments before harsh receptions at the box office of the patriotic film, and yet again and again produce a thousand clunkers that don't deserve the penalty and spend 2 min. on view them but as noses will run something like? On the one hand we have the actors always seen in Teleseryes (as for example the serrano) or any work of Theatre (or music), we put one argument saw that the TBO, with a current soundtrack, themes of any group of fashion, and try to sell it to teenagers, which are, more than anything, people are going to go by box office to pay the entry; but don't we realize that, before this movie or any "americanada" self-respecting, the spanish teenager, is going to leave their in the film "Made in USA". Lords Spanish film, producers take a tape to fruition is complicated, expensive and in some cases even a mission impossible, hundreds of movies are left in the dark, or sleep "sleep of the righteous" in some drawer of a top executive, gentlemen, we want to film us excited, do us spend a good or bad time, but not these clunkers, where one smiles (slightly) for a couple of moments and then continues to something else butterfly, as if nothing happened. You have the decency, kindness, or whatever, in not drain us a thousand times the same film; look as things like "The orphanage", "El laberinto del Fauno", "[·REC], or even the more quirky cinema of Santiago Segura (with that the quota of casposidad is covered), they fill halls, I need not say more right?" Of the film, let me you speak little, to say nothing, since the few min. in which one smiles are thanks to a Lady of the Spanish scene as it is the illustrious Terele Pavez, the rest is a succession of gags more seen than the comic book, of inheritance eschatological, silly to the more not power, and tits and ass, ah! And poop, ass, fart, pis. That this love to the chavalería. And finally, well, frankly, spend 2 hours of your time to read anything, from a Kafka to the mark last week, but!God don't waste their time in such crappy! (let case for once in his life). |
1,738 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/47 | Verolindapechocha | Sophie Scholl | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Why are Germans reviewing this sad part of its history? | Sophie Scholl - the latter day (Germany, 2005) is one of the nominees for the Oscar in the best foreign film category. She tells a little-known truth: that there were young Germans that rebelled against Nazism, seeking to inform the rest of the German population of the absurdities of Adolf Hitler on the pointless massacre in the war, about the murder of thousands of Jews. Young as Sophie and Hans Scholl, brothers who died in the guillotine for their ideals. The film chronicles the last six days of their lives. His crime? His treason? Having distributed leaflets against Nazism in the University and not betraying their pacifist group "White rose" classmates.The actions of the protagonist, Julia Jentsch, is strong, serene, notable, an interpretation that screams: courage! It is said that the Academy is claiming the previous version of the Oscar, when it was included in the same category to the German film, the fall (2004), which showed the "nice" side of Hitler and Nazism, which injured some sensitivities.Outside that reasonable suspicion for me Sophie Scholl was a good movie, but I wouldn't say excellent. Maybe it's that I'm a little tired of the subject of Nazism and the obvious control of the Jews in the film industry. When you can, you can ($ $$). Also leads me to wonder because the Germans are reviewing cinematically that sad part of its history, now more than ever. Perhaps they have always done and the global distribution was not that of now, I do not know. |
1,739 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/823 | Silvia | Hijos de los hombres | 3 | 5 | muchocine | It takes place in constant tension of not knowing what bring the future to Owen and its protected. Luckily I Michael Caine it deals offer the humorous note. | Imagine that we are in the year 2027 and humanity is doomed to destruction because they are not born more children worldwide. Alfonso Cuaron returns to surprise us and change log (remember that MOM led titles as diverse as one of the installments of Harry Potter and the exciting and you also) with a history of science fiction which has sufficient elements of reality and so that the viewer touches before the catastrophe which tells.Children of men is an adaptation of a novel by P.D. James that recreates an apocalyptic and bleak future where the human race is doomed to disappear because due to a strange epidemic - which is not very well defined - the men and women are not able to have decentralized-Baghdad. A barren, infertile, world in constant state of war and conflict, with an incompetent Government, inexplicably, for facilitating the suicide of the people managing them a kind of relief to suicide kits. It is frightening to see how bombed them with the idea through TV spots, as if it were any other product.A Government which does not know to deal with the problem of mass immigration, which ignores and despises. The streets of the world appear full of cages in which foreigners, in the style of the concentration camps are imprisoned. It may seem paradoxical, but under the passive gaze of the Government, terrorist groups seem to be the only ones concerned about the progress of humanity. And is that the movie teaches us there is no good or bad, only people trying to survive in the best way they can.The environment of destruction is perfectly profiled in the film: streets populated waste where the smell of destruction is almost able to penetrate the screen, human mountains of immigrants crowded in cages which dangerous animals, traffic chaos, widespread disorder, the living image of the chaos and the decline of the human race. But the chaos that reflects the film is not the kind of chaos that usually us show science fiction (with alien invasions of the war of the worlds-style) but one much more appalling because it seems a warning that if the world continues along the same path, the situation shows that we can become a reality.The anguish and despair of knowing the proximity of the end of the universe permeates every scene of the film, but are you miss a little over emotional involvement by the protagonists face catastrophe, especially the character that plays Clive Owen. Example of what you are talking about is the serene, hieratic, attitude which shows the character when his father, uncommon attitude to a fact of such emotional magnitude died. Although perhaps it is understandable in the situation of resignation before the catastrophe living.But not everything is hopelessness is a pregnant woman last may be the salvation of humanity and the character of Clive Owen will be responsible of protect and accompany her in his search for what he called human project, a set of intellectuals working on an initiative in the hope of building a better world. It is precisely a woman immigrant than carrying in her womb the hope for humanity, while the Government does not want to open our eyes to the immigration.The film takes place in constant tension of not knowing what bring the future to Owen and its protected. Luckily I Michael Caine it deals offer the humorous note, with its role of hippie father of the protagonist, the only one that seems to have not lost the illusion for life.The end, but you can guess, manages to excite and open a small glimmer of hope in the midst of a story in which the resignation to the human tragedy flies over a world broken by pain. Recommended for those who believe that the end of the world is just around the corner. |
1,740 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2873 | Bruji | Ana Karenina | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Bad language that there was not a single day of filming in which the requirements (including feed properly your New cat) and continuing complaints from the Scarlet Ms. crisparan not the nerves of the technical team. | Chapter one-All happy families resemble. Every unhappy family, it is in their own way.Five November 1.913 was born in La India Vivian Mary Hartley. Do with Irish blood in the veins, the movie buff world her known as Scarlett O?Hara, the charm of the Red Earth of Tara in "what the wind"; "one of the most charismatic and fascinating of the history of the Cine.Ocho characters years later of the mythical film, Vivien Leigh abided the orders of the director and French writer Julien Duvivier in a new film adaptation of Anna Karenina."Neither a Word nor a gesture you never forget. "How it he could?"The classic of world literature, work Summit of l? amour fou, shows the hypocrisy of a (non-exclusive of the 19th century) reactionary society, which fills with contempt and solitude to those who do not follow their obsolete regulations. Between delusion and reality, the protagonist, desperate, not only begins to doubt the feelings of the man whom she loves, but also his own chances as a human being. An untenable situation that forces to escape from itself.Bad language that there was not a single day of filming in which the requirements (including feed properly your New cat) and continuing complaints from the Scarlet Ms. crisparan not the nerves of the technical team and, above all, the director. So much so, that the producer Alexander Korda (great friend of the actress) has to intervene on numerous occasions, hastily traveling from California to calm down.Finally, the film premièred January 22, 1948 in the British capital and later in New York. Shot in Russia and in London, with an impressive artistic direction of Andrej Andrejew, excellent photography and exquisite costumes designed in Paris, it fails miserably in the recruitment of the main actor (a newcomer that never more was learned) and, what is worse, fails in the narrative structure. Maybe the error is found in a nothing brilliant script which showed the disagreements that have arisen between the director and the producer, who opt for different writers. The result is one product bothered to show the Tsarist Russia pompous, interpretative Ralph Richardson (important actor of the English stage) skills and the extraordinary beauty of the protagonist (his face always appears illuminated when everything remains in half-light), than in telling precisely the dramatic history. The novel of Tolstoy has been carried the film nineteen times, which joined four television films and three television series. Actresses of all time and many nationalities have given life to the enigmatic Lady, but the criticism is unanimous in pointing out to the divine Swedish as Anna Karenina par excellence. Greta Garbo would interpret this role on two occasions: in 1927 and 1935, in a production of David o. SelznickLa plot lead to passion for the impossible love attached to railway stations. "Brief encounter" of David Lean, "fall in love" performed by Robert de Niro and Meryl Streep and the recent "unchecked" starring the attractive Clive Owen, are just some examples of approach of Karenina-mania. Two oscar-winning, undeniable talent and false smile, actress protagonist of unforgettable films. You can to Vivien lost the reins of his life for the benefit of an inappropriate love (which isn't it?). Maybe he destroyed his own happiness with both hands, as did the characters that exceeded. That not cared or that there was no exit may. Or you can simply, to always think that "really, tomorrow is another day". |
1,741 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3561 | Iñaki Bilbao | Rec | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Curious and interesting Spanish horror film. | Curious and quite acceptable horror film, whose producer as estimable Mr. Julio Fernández and the Fimax distributor improve Allied for the international market, with everything that this brings positive.It is an entertaining tape, which one, although not terrorized, but which has voltage and is quite entertaining.Principals, Jaume Balagueró and Paco Plaza, ready in hunger for these purposes, manage mix horror, intrigue, suspense and humor, attractive way to the Viewer, who begins seeing the movie with some mistrust and surprise, for more late entering a daily world of cruel and bloody terror.And is that is what more I liked this film, terror is credible (if we accept your premise, clear) because comes not from other distant worlds, but something daily, close, next. from our own neighborhood, from our own stairs with our neighbours as terrified characters who do not know what the hell happens or how to escape from the nightmare.In addition, the humor is very well inserted, with these horny reporter interviews to the neighbors when they still do not know what awaits them really.Manuela Velasco does superbly well (won the best actress award at the prestigious Sitges 2007 international film festival), combining to perfection his sympathy and comedy from the beginning, with the infinite panic at the end. But the rest of performers will not lag behind, getting transmit their fear thanks to some natural interpretations, very worthy.The worst, but on this occasion is understood, it is the way of telling all, with that dance of St. Vitus constant of the camera, that can go mad, although us also gets fully into the sinister history. And as everything is flmado camera in hand so be on this occasion.Another negative thing, but that you can't blame the film itself is that many scenes, more or less, already quite seen in horror movies. But the truth is that it is a competent film that I think gets what intended, is not nothing to scare away a large part of the public (I was going to put "the majority", but with me they have not managed and with other spectators either, as evidenced by the fact of laughter that came from some rows). But the same were laughter caused by absolute terror.In short, okay and like, but you are great these bizarre epithets that some her qualify, as "An undisputed classic of modern horror". Well, well, without exaggeration, that can turn against. |
1,742 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2703 | Iñaki Bilbao | El extraño (Le équipier) | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Interesting French film that has been slow to be released in the Spanish commercial theaters. | Quite entertaining and interesting French movie, directed with mimo although not too much imagination by Philipe Loiret, for my an unknown filmmaker.It is narrated in a clear way and interest increases as the minutes pass and we know more details of the stranger who has come to the place "more paragraph in the world", as stated several times during the film.The orography of place, as well as customs and idiosyncrasy of the inhabitants, they become protagonists of what is happening gradually. And the sea, almost always enraged, threatening, that without the lighthouse of the place could be the tomb of a good number of people.The pace is suitable to combine scenes of dramatic tension, together with intimistas, where looks and silences, as well as small details on the objects of the houses.The history of love, of vital importance, is expressing with touch and feeling.To make the film entertaining, help the good acting work of all / as the / as interpreters, especially the marriage composed by Philippe Torreton and Sandrine Bonnaire, both terrific and very well adjusted in their respective roles. As co-star, Grégore Derangère, perhaps is you should blame does not change almost never face. It shall be said that it is for his introspective character, but the truth is that not abound in him the nuances.Good times, as everything that happens on the feast of July 14, and a final, the last scene, really emotional. In short, I do not think that it is an excellent film work, although the technical section is exquisite, as the excellent music by Nicola Piovani, but it has a pleasant aroma and repent not one to have seen. |
1,743 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1506 | Victor Omar | Cartas desde Iwo Jima | 5 | 5 | muchocine | It is a simple story that has foregone all the clichés and moralisms that suffers the war genre. Us shivers realizing the falsity of the war and how it generates differences and non-existent barriers between humans so intimately. | If we could describe the movie in a few words would say that we we have a modern classic.The director and his two writers (the quoted Paul Haggis and a Japanese, Iris Yamashita, based on the correspondence of general Tadamichi Kuribayashi) turn the film into a moral and physical experience (claustrophobic) at the same time, that show the calvary of thousands of Japanese soldiers who, knowing of his military inferiority - waited for long hours the enemy confined in caves and trenches dug by them in full mountain.His eyes wide and inclusive, Eastwood describes the experiences from four well various angles: two common soldiers as noble Baker Saigo (pop star Kazunari Ninomiya) and the maverick Shimizu (Ryo Kase); Baron Nishi (Tsuyoshi Ihara), an aristocrat who knew how to be Olympic champion in riding and personal friend of Mary Pickford and Douglas Fairbanks, and lieutenant general Tadamichi Kuribayashi (excellent interpretation by Ken Watanabe), the character more rich in nuances of the film.His story is eloquent to show illogical extremes of war, along with an elegant language and intelligent management of the pace.Mercy, the fear, the honor and cowardice, repulsion and madness are latent in every scene, with a photograph of the documentary record of the time of Tom Stern that becomes realistic, with its 80th colors.It unravels the Japanese with unusual psychological complexity; naked them in his courage, in its violence, ancestral named, on their fears, their curiosity, in his goodness and even in a surprising tenderness.It is a simple story that has foregone all the clichés and moralisms that suffers the war genre. Us shivers realizing the falsity of the war and how it generates differences and non-existent barriers between humans so intimately.Eastwood polls the atmosphere of Iwo Jima since Japanese soldiers fortifican her until that they defend and, ultimately, lose as they also lost their lives.In battles, except on rare occasions, never the opposite side, we see that the director just trying to show the personal consequences on the side of which we are witnesses of the facts.It was in "The conquest of honour", but much more cruel, more direct, more terrible.Eastwood links these sequences with long conversations between the soldiers and the memories of each one, without decline interest nor an only moment.The head is very intelligent in its treatment, because, on the one hand, shows the Japanese in various acts of courage and cowardice, but at the same time, makes it very clear, respectful but implacable, so that something did not work well in their military culture.The film works perfectly if same, without having seen "Flags of our fathers", although obviously you can see its Parallels.Seen as a whole, the two films are complemented to draw that line, so thin and capricious but at the same time as defined in the war separates the winners from the losers, the dead of alive. "Letters from Iwo Jima" is a film about the feelings.It is a mural tragic but complete instructive that highlights everything that humans can feel when it is subjected to the irrationality and stupidity.And the manifestation of this orgullo-honor becomes a form of social integration that generates a culture of belonging to whatever, race, religion, nation or all of them and that aligns to the individuals giving them a shared identity.That fit where patria, race, religion, faith and commitment to the extent that makes us happy and gives us peace of mind.Surely there is not another thing that recognize the alien space and identify the enemy by the name that reads in your mailbox.If we do, it is possible to see that the supposed enemy is another neighbor who, like us, probably also expected letter.And the question that should be is: If humanity has always suffered the horror of the war, if it is not a solution or an outlet to a conflict between men, is why reincidimos?If history serves the purpose that people learn not to commit the same mistakes, why we insist?For Clint Eastwood war is a single, and there is no good or bad, or if any, the same found in one and another side. |
1,744 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/298 | Marta | El tigre y la nieve | 3 | 5 | muchocine | It is one of those movies that I possibly thing if he had not left the cinema with the feeling of seeing again "life is beautiful" | Lo último de Roberto Benigni is one of those movies that I possibly thing if he had not left the cinema with the feeling of seeing again "life is beautiful". I'm sorry, but comparisons are odious, and it is impossible not to see the parallels between the two. Nobody understand me wrong; "The Tiger and the snow" I liked. A heart-warming love story, brutal part of a war, and a very entertaining film. But it is more of the same, and with worse results. The concentration camp of "life is beautiful" becomes an Iraqi hospital, affection towards a child becomes love towards a woman, and humor and hope as a weapon in a tough situation are repeated in the two films. In addition, Roberto Benigni is like Woody Allen: always plays the same character - and I like Woody Allen, but that is something that cannot be denied. If, as in this case, the movie is also similar, the result was disappointing. The few who have not seen "life is beautiful" you will find a beautiful film that mixes humor and tragedy with ability. That they have seen, it is possible that, like me, think that this time has not treated with as much sensitivity a subject so delicate - and current-, the script is not so well resolved, the histrionic Italian is already burdensome and that, Furthermore, the end lacks power, is precipitated and wasted created tension. In any case, but does not create that is bright, it seems a good option for who wants to see something interesting in the film. |
1,745 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/833 | Tito Chinchan | El castillo en el cielo | 4 | 5 | muchocine | We do not have large doses of violence and it has a heavy burden of moralina that does not hurt in these times. And possibly to the kids they love. | I cannot overlook the fact the original name of the film "The castle of Laputa". Not is if they should change the name to the Spanish version, given that they could have edited two, exactly equal, and it had double the profits. These so deep names have much commercial tug. Well, I misled before you start.The film is about a young girl found on board a type of airship. This is addressed and the girl falls into the void. When it is about to esmorrarse against soil, a necklace that bears wakes up making it float. Below, a kid with some resemblance to Peter (of Heidi, no Almodovar) picked up and aid. And I will not tell more, that for a worthwhile not I her I destripo.We have a recording with an aftertaste of total "The journey of spirited away", although a little bit worse. The introduction is incredibly beautiful, with machines that seem drawn from the imagination of Leonardo Da Vinci. Although truth be told, then they do not have much to do with the movie, but it is interesting. The pictures remind us much framework and Heidi (I was waiting to see if he left the monkey Amelio, but in the end does not appear). The argument is not incredible, as the spirited away, although it is not wrong. And what still find me amazing is the imagination that these people to make unlikely cities and unworkable junk. It is impressive. As a point against, which is a bit long, but to me I care not.In short, that you paseis by the video store to rent right now, which is one of those that like to see. We do not have large doses of violence and it has a heavy burden of moralina that does not hurt in these times. And possibly to the kids they love (although remind you that girls do not fly, by many necklaces with). |
1,746 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2518 | JLO | El caso Bourne | 4 | 5 | muchocine | One of the achievements of the script is that everything is held not by the action scenes, but by the relationship of the two characters in a linear fashion, slowly and without false steps or sentimental. | Police thriller brought to the screen by Doug Liman and performing with tasteful, true to the book and rate sustained in your footage. Adaptation of part three of the novel by the renowned Robert Ludlum died recently and is also one of the producers of the film. A road movie set in the streets of Paris, the beautiful landscapes of Prague and the North of Italy, enhancing its landscapes with an excellent photograph.The film tells of Jason (Matt Damon) temporary amnesia and the search for its own personality with the help of Marie (Franka Potente) initially reluctantly, suffering persecution and rediscovering him with forgotten skills - and very useful - to discover his past. It is not a common film addressed as the old serial TV, but in a manner uncommon to today so prone movies of the spectacular nature, having a healthy kinship perhaps with the series mission Imposible.Con all ingredients into perspective and realistic and is: fighting hand-to-hand, spectacular persecution of cars, duels with bullets. Everything with sobriety, credibility and relentlessly. One of the achievements of the script is that everything is held not by the action scenes, but by the relationship of the two characters in a linear fashion, slowly and without false steps or sentimental. In the manner of a modern James Bond but without glamour, Matt Damon plays a good work by content, for a secret agent role without unrest and almost touching the deadpan. Following the analogismo, the powerful German (without the sex appeal of the Bond girls) shows once again how good actress who is more than a mere being partner of the hero. A final scene which is surprising because it breaks with all above realism, but not blurs a good smaller - action film that yes - but with good characters and well worn, something small and welcome in these times. |
1,747 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1269 | Caty | Matar a un Ruiseñor | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Do it was one of the first films to deal with the issue of discrimination and racial intolerance, without presumptions and? ñoñerías?, a tape in which a white man educates their children teaching them to respect people, are those who, while confronted with obstacles of a petty and reticent society to accept differences. | We are faced with a sublime film, captivating, at times sensíble and at times memorable, deserves to be considered one of the best films of all time, conquers you with a simplicity that has prevailed since the beginning until the end. Adaptation of the novel by Harper Lee, tells us a drama about the best and worst of the human being and the cruelties many times we are able to commit.A very different, intriguing and original start time, brings me to tell you about the argument: it all starts in the small southern town of Maycomb, in full during the depression. Atticus Finch(Gregory_Peck_en_el_que_fue_el_papel_de_su_vida), is a humble lawyer who lives with his two sons and his employee at home without many luxuries, but with great dignity. Atticus children are obedient, responsible and educated: from small, learned the principles of Justice, equality and respect for others with his father? relationship father and children is therefore solid and strong also because Finch makes, mother and father at the same time.But all this is when our protagonist agrees to defend the black Tom Robinson(Brock_Peters), accused of raping a young white woman. Atticus then becomes the object of the hatred and racism of some inhabitants of the city, angry because Finch defends a person of color. On the other hand, at the same time trying to win the case, try to protect their children from those feelings of hatred that he is a victim. The day of the trial, Atticus proves the innocence of the accused, proving to all the hypocrisy and cynicism of such charges, simply because of the color of the skin of the person. Even so the verdict is guilty for Tom Robinson.Hay at least four great moments to highlight all the footage: 1) when the daughter of Atticus, Scout (Mary Badham), in a scene in which his father is cornered by several inhabitants of the village, the away simply taking an innocent conversation with one of them – when asked by his son, fellow in the school of Scout - and where we can see the innocence of a girl without evil faced with a person full of hatred and prejudice. (2) When Finch tells his sons the history that gives title to the film and only they understand at the end of this. ((3) The Sheriff of Maycomb, Atticus warning that "go for it" and 4) the scene of the exit of the Court of Atticus, after defending Tom Robinson, when all blacks sitting in the Hall stand and greet it with pride.We should also remember that the veteran actor Robert Duvall makes his first appearance on the big screen, in the role of Boo Radley, a young man with some mental retardation and a mysterious past that gives cause for admiration, fear and fascination by the Finch children, collecting small objects of wood and SOAP that Boo size them and deposited into the hole of a tree outside the House in this film.As the main protagonist of the movie, Gregory Peck, it must be said in its favour fully delivered to the character, with a heart and a sincerity beyond doubt, making - as I mentioned in a previous sentence - the role of his career. It is very difficult to imagine another actor playing Atticus Finch, that we should consider a true hero, a full, just and tolerant person, a lawyer of provinces with few ideals over any kind of pettiness. As it could not be less, won Oscar for that role for best actor. Mention that the film also won the statuette to the best artistic direction, a merit in history, that really viewers feel immersed in the era portrayed in all its details. "The great adapted screenplay of Horton Foote also took the statuette.""To kill a Mockingbird" was one of the first films to deal with the issue of discrimination and racial intolerance, without presumptions and "ñoñerías", a tape in which a white man educates their children teaching them to respect people, they are those who, while confronted with obstacles of a petty and reticent society to accept differences. Do ultimately, a good story, a good director, his Excellency actor and a photograph in black and white unique? It was sung had to leave a masterpiece. |
1,748 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1331 | Silvia | El truco final (The Prestige) | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Christopher Nolan gives us a story perfectly set and twist of amazing script which shows the danger of the obsessions, which can lead to tragedy. | "Every great magic trick consists in three acts." The first is called 'The briefing': the magician shows something that seems ordinary, but of course,. It is not. The second act is called 'The action': the magician makes the ordinary is transformed into something special. Now, if you are looking for the secret. "you will not find, is why there is a third act called 'The Prestige': this is the part with the unexpected twists, where life hangs on a thread, and then you see something shocking that you had never seen before". With these words he explains Michael Caine the functioning of the shows of magic at the beginning of the film The Prestige, but that has reached our screens with the title 'The final trick' (the Spanish horrendous translation).Two magicians (Hugh Jackman and Christian Bale), both the same wizard and colleagues initially, apprentices begin to hate after a tragic accident. Their rivalry to get the best magic trick takes them to try to boycott constantly, this obsession to be the best you will have unexpected consequences. A struggle for achieving professional success that will make us ask ourselves every moment what character is less negligible until we realize that they are morally just as petty.Obviously masculine interpretations (Jackman, Bale and Michael Caine always correct) take the leading role. As in the case of many directors, it seems that Nolan continues to trend to reducing the female characters who become mere objects of accompaniment of the protagonists. Scarlett Johanson seems to have the sole task of wearing his corset in the film. Only the character of the wife of Bale is granted a role in which they can Excel more (not too).In what perhaps fails the film is in the enjoyment of the shows of magic because the Viewer is too busy attempting to decipher the trick to fool him. In addition, the fact that the Viewer is explain the trick of almost all the shows (less than the most important, obviously) subtract emotion to the matter. Something that was not the case in the illusionist. Another problem is that at times the film becomes something repetitive, that it takes many turns on the same idea of the obsession to know the final trick.Do however, the script no longer surprising that the director is always saved? as the Magi - an ACE in the sleeve to keep the attention of the Viewer. The film perfectly fulfills the role of any show of magic: constantly mislead a viewer throughout the film which will be wondering what will happen despuésLa film and laughter hides a terrifying message: to succeed in life everything is lawful. The end justifies the means for these magicians that are worth of deception and manipulation to achieve their goals. An aggressive fight to reach fame, to be recognized as the best in society. A competitiveness that do not understand friendship, love or any other aspect that is not related to the social prestige. A fight in which endangers the own personal relationships and even the physical integrity of the competitors.Christopher Nolan gives us a story perfectly set and twist of amazing script which shows the danger of the obsessions, which can lead to tragedy. As universal feelings as the envy, resentment, competitiveness and ambition are experienced to the limit by the two protagonists until its moral destruction. Because the road to the success of the two protagonists is also the path towards their personal destruction. |
1,749 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3166 | Rafa Ferrer | Las vueltas de la vida | 2 | 5 | muchocine | A romantic comedy that, based on a fairly original premise, ends up doing waters by the stupid habit of having to finish all of them with the heavy and overused "happy end". | We have the typical film love to my wife, I am surprised by their own initiative and without his usual toward this type of film pressure have I seen, let us not deceive ourselves, Jennifer Garner in the poster and as absolute protagonist is sufficient thrust for losing almost 2 hours viewing.A surprise (I always get curious and it seems that you repeat more than garlic), that the tape starts so dramatically go tarring and turning into one comedy more of the lot, and that, little by little, the original premise is quite good; bride loses her future husband in a car accident and thanks to the friends of this begins to learn all that, hidden by him, not met in vida.¿La paste? And there is enough, it's waters, which advocates too easily makes the script to the "tor world is Bueno" (which said Manolo Summers, RIP) and that lawyers towards the "happy End" of this type of production the film one end almost almost with the same face, the same feelings, with which he began viewing.We certainly have one of these tapes of consumption quickly, with Jennifer Garner (it has operated los morros?), Timothy Oliphant (the actor that will give life to the hero of the game "Hitman"), Kevin Smith in State of grace (perhaps the best of the movie are their many jokes), and Juliette Lewis, such as closure of the campus. By the way, I found it fun to find Fiona Shaw, the already famous Aunt Petunia "Harry Potter" as mother of Jennifer Garner in this film.Anyway, without extending me too, a romantic comedy that, based on a fairly original premise, ends up doing waters by the stupid habit of having to finish all of them with the heavy and overused "happy end". |
1,750 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2713 | Rafa Ferrer | Teresa, el cuerpo de Cristo | 3 | 5 | muchocine | I can not say that the tape I has delighted, that he was expecting something stronger, more controversial and voracious from Loriga, and I found something that tries to give wax, without getting to do so at any time. | Since that I knew of her conception was expecting something of this film that Ray Loriga (another epileptic as the Holy and a server) has been responsible for bringing to the screen, generating some that another controversy with the Church, which, I imagine that you seeing Paz Vega in the poster imagined the Saint appeared in minor cloth; Unfortunately, and for fans of "the divine" peace come only appears briefly nude. but on his back.I can not say that the tape I has delighted, that he was expecting something stronger, more controversial and voracious from Loriga, and I found something that tries to give wax, without getting to do so at any time, with a strange montage (both Fade in, Fade out, bored to the painted) and where perhaps Paz Vega and Leonor Watling saved from burning (the rest of the cast is simple)(, and seem to be more concerned with the cold of Avila that by being faithful to their roles), that Yes, amazed and open-mouthed has left me the excellent costumes, Eastern Court, created by the winner of an Oscar in 1993 for "The cell", the Eastern Ishioka.Cierto Eiko is that I know little of the life of the Saint, go, what known anyone with a bit of general culture, and that his life and his "ecstasy" (for my epileptic simple attacks) isn't that never have struck me too, although if it is true Monica Bellucci got sit Chair with his Mary Magdalene in Mel Gibson's "the passion", expected that Paz Vega did likewise with the santa de Ávila (sincerely)(fails).Ultimately, a tape that it could have been much more if, and that unfortunately remains in an I want to and I can not do perhaps tape compulsory in schools when they touch the life of the Holy? (or much to tight the LOGSE). |
1,751 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4150 | Moebius | Zulú | 3 | 5 | muchocine | On 22 January 1879, 139 Welsh of the British army defendiron a base located on a mission against a Zulu force of 4,000 warriors. The film "Zulu" is based on the events of that day. | She is what I said. I only came to build a bridge.The British defeat at Isandlwana shocked an empire, but that same day, 22 January 1879, at Rorke's Drift, 139 Welsh (including wounded and aggregates, and a Scot) marked a milestone in military history defending a base located on a mission against a Zulu force estimated at 4,000 warriors. The Zulu film is based on the events of that day.If dawn Zulu focused in the main battle of Isandlwana and presented (if somewhat briefly) the reasons that led to such a conflict, Zulu focuses in the gesta of Lieutenant John Chard and his men and terrible round-the-clock that lived facing massive tribal force.The film opens with a massive Zulu wedding in the Royal camp where the Reverend Otto Witt and his daughter attended as guests. A few words of the Reverend we know that the conflict between British and Zulu is about to explode, although any other reference to the cause is obvious. A Messenger interrupted the celebrations to tell the jefeCetshwayo of the victory at Insandlwana. Before the alarming news and seeing his Church in danger, the Rev. Witt part with her daughter to warn the British detachment occupied by the mission. In the following scenes we have the main characters of Zulu. The first is the Lieutenant John Chard, of the Corps of Royal Engineers of the army, which is raising a bridge over a river. The second is the Lieutenant Gonville Bromhead, in charge of the military post of the mission. Initially Chard appears as an efficient military, while Bromhead, who returns from a hunting expedition accompanied by a few native servants, makes a first impression of being the typical military arrogant Aristocrat. As it is seen below, the richness of nuances that are both characters will cause that our first impression deBromhead and Chard (as well as which the own characters saved each other) changes as the narration. Bromhead comes from a family tradition of military, while Chard is an engineer without the combat experience. When Witt informs them of the imminent Zulu attack, Chard assumes command since his appointment in a few months preceding the Bromhead. Generally speaking, in any film a fact so predicts disaster, as it may occur in the same Zulu dawn without going any further.The initial clash between the two officers will be developed at the same time carried out preparations for the defence of the mission.Bromhead to comply with the orders but refuses to provide any other assistance to Chard, whose ignorance of the Zulu tactics and terrain is evident. In first thing is aided by a Boer added, while in the second it is left guided by their instinct. The director of the film, Cy Endfield, manages to carve out an interesting interaction between the two characters. The decision of Chard to stay to defend the place first make a kind of arrogant officer in search of glory. Later, while Lieutenant dictates some in principle sound provisions the oficialBromhead seems to act at all times with some flippant. As it was traditional in the war films of the era, the first part of the film serves to go featuring a gallery of characters with which we can identify ourselves and through whose experiences can get to know different moments of the battle and understand their reactions and feelings. Between the Group's different side stresses especially the soldadoHook, an ex - inmate dealing with nursing faking sick and seek initially avoid any potential risk or participation in combat. As it could not be otherwise, you'll end up behaving like a hero. We must also mention the sargentoBourne, typical veteran martial and impassive, and several soldiers of different condition: an ex - farmer who seems more concerned about animals than by his comrades, the novice unnerved, the typical drunkard, or the head of the Welsh choir, which takes leading role in one of the strangest scenes delfilm. In one of the brief lapses of the battle Welsh and Zulu they do a musical battle on to see who sings best and highest. Welsh advantage to drop one of the best quotes from the film: "these malditoszulúes have good low, but we have best Tenors". Priceless. Finally, I cannot comment on the strange evolution of the character of the reverendoWitt. Restrained religious of the beginning of the movie will witness a strange evolution that will end up with a desperate Witt imploring carried the wounded there, dropping verses as a fan and, ultimately, (can't find another way to describe it), giving ass to all those who are trying to save their lives.Witt will end up totally drunk locked in a warehouse. If you have to applaud the construction of characters as the two lieutenants believe it is also fair to note queWitt gives the impression of a blurred, almost parodic, figure in the middle of a full film of solid portraits. The best part of Zulu technically begins at the dawn of the battle, highlighting the travelling and the use of the crane with the Endfield adds intensity and a sort of 19th century elegance to the action. Previously director us worried about strange rumors and distant sounds appear to a train of footprints, and although logically assume that they are loszulúes, never cease to seem me disconcerting. They startle the scenes where the horizon is covered of warriors, especially towards the bottom, where Endfield, once already has us biting the bait, he surprises us by pulling on the line and leave us breathless for a moment.Together with the composition of key scenes and the wonderful portrait of several characters that make up the film, the director keeps in suspense to the viewer with the continuous comings and goings of the Zulus and the development of the battle throughout a day. Those who enjoy war history enjoy double contemplating the different Warrior Wiles and the tactical counterpart of the tenienteChard, in what has become a long and agonizing chess game in which the black pieces have an overwhelming infinite number of pawns.Another interesting aspect of Zulu is that his heroes are flesh and blood, and emotions and fear, something which is not usual in this type of films. If initially Bromhead boasted of ancestry military, he later confess to having felt panic. As the battle progresses Bromhead will change mind on Lieutenant Chard, and in a moment of weakness he will come to his aid. At the end of the tape, in a memorable dramatic moment, Bromhead shared his feelings with Chard, who closed a great dialogue with the phrase that opens this criticism.Zulu was a project by Endfield and actor Stanley Baker, who plays Lt. Chard sober but effectively. Both put their pocket money to finance this interesting war film, and in fact Endfield deepening in the británico-zulú conflict by signing the script for Zulu dawn, where the famous tribe charged more prominence.Michael Caine, which was her first role protagonist, runs with his usual accuracy the interpretation of the seemingly impassive tenienteBromhead. James Booth, with its image of quarrelsome player fits perfectly as the soldier Hook. Finally, Jack Hawkins, the unforgettable captain of galera of Ben Hur, portraying the Reverend maniac Witt. The film closes with a tribute to the fallen (other than as many as it might appear in the film) and eleven military personnel awarded the cross of victory, a precious award that has never been as high number for a single action in that distant battle of Rourke's Drift. I would like to close this post by recalling a comic scene of Zulu, that in which the undaunted military surgeon requests some soldiers to reject a few warriors seeking to enter through a window of the Chapel while it continues to operate as if such a thing. British phlegm in its purest form. |
1,752 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2269 | JLO | El hundimiento | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Manipulative, didactics, a solemn moments and clearly necessary. Oppressive in many moments, with steady pace and excellent performances led by Bruno Ganz. | Oliver Hirschbiegel (the experiment), finally was responsible for one of the toughest, most realistic works made in the World War II film, mention of a mea culpa German which comes with many years of backwardness. Light years from the the list of Schindler and the better the pianist victories, although aunque ambas both they pecarían of lightness in comparison. This does not mean that the sinking meets all expectations - and less policy - but the world and the rules of the film. The last days of the great dictator are addressed with harshness and didacticism - is not a theme or an easy to make film - based on the book by historian Joachim Fest (Der Untergang) and mainly in the memoirs of Hitler's Secretary, Traudl Junge.Comencemos leaving clear some of the criticisms that were made to the film, one of the most criticized and bless that year. This film never gets to be condescending or mitificadora of the figure of the Fuehrer. It is true that it is affectionate with his Secretary or to the kisses with his dog, but does not focus at all in this. Moreover, ten minutes one already hates. His paranoia, his lack of tact, his delusions of grandeur and a murderous conduct prevail. It is not claustrophobic while everything takes place in the underground bunker in Berlin, where Hitler spent his last days but only apparently. They are displayed the city streets and the vicissitudes of the people with a child and a medical German soldier - Professor Schenck - examples of civility, and also to achieve some empathy with the Viewer.It is true that nothing is shown of the concentration camps, but is another story that there is here. Germans themselves are who are exterminated by the Red Army, while being the "bad" of history. The collapse also is manipulative, didactic, solemn moments and clearly necessary. Oppressive in many moments, with steady pace and excellent performances led by Bruno Ganz, a realist and therefore delusional Hitler.Su stooped back, his advanced Parkinson, his look lost part of a whole which astonishes. "Naked us (without overacting) the decline of the largest global nightmare at the point just cruelty, that even expired, you want to drag as many people as possible with him."Not I have pity. We do not force them. We voted and gave us a mandate. "And are now paying" said in a moment of anger. Without words. The error of the director is gloat with some performances with strong images - like the children of Goebbels - and not show of himself with his wife, with a saving ellipsis. Mistake made to lose part of the ability to question its own black history but not tarnishes the outcome of the film. |
1,753 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1145 | Rafa Ferrer | Candida | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Even so, always you can say that "I liked more the book" right? ALE, now all to buy "Candida, memoirs of an Assistant: when God presses, drowns but good". | This time Javier Fesser's brother William, in the production of the film (Javier, not William, that I mess), composed a film that still drinking from the sources of the Fesser is a tragi-comedy, hard, acidic and very fun, where presented us the life of a woman made if same, beginning to end.Tremendous interpretation of Candida, without knowing just read, interprets masterfully a role based on his own life, accompanying the typical side that we are accustomed to seeing on television, especially to Jorge Bosch.La film is divided into two parts, mainly separated by a touch that sometimes clears the genius (the principle, fast, fun, cool), with a very almibarado ending that seems that we find ourselves in a "reality".Even so, always you can say that "I liked more the book" right? ALE, now all to buy "Candida, memoirs of an Assistant: when God presses, drowns but good". |
1,754 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4268 | Bloody Will | Hacia rutas salvajes | 5 | 5 | muchocine | A film that moves, moves and keeps your heart shrunk as a pass. | Sometimes one is easier to give its opinion on a film that has holes on all sides. A very bad performance, an infumable script or a story that has no where to take can be criticized. The trouble is when you find yourself with a film that excites, moves and keeps your heart shrunk as a. I would not know how to describe my reaction to 'Wild routes towards': I cried like a child with its history and I have not been able to take off the eyes to so much visual wonder. One of the best films Hollywood has released in the last half of the year and it has inexplicably been ignored by nominations to the Oscars with others who deserved it a lot less.Some will already have its Director as the main reason to attend its screening. Sean Penn is characterized by extremely intimate movies with palpable obsession towards human relations. This form of filmmaking tends to sometimes fall into excessively boring footage and stories that extend the drama, but in 'Towards wild routes' Penn has managed to avoid that 140 minutes become a nightmare with sincerity, simplicity and stimulating the senses to the maximum extent.Based on a best-selling novel of Jon Kracauer written in 1996, Penn gives form to a script which tells the life and thoughts of Chris McCandless, played by Emile Hirsch, a young man of 23 years who after graduating from the University decides to leave everything, including hiper-absorbentes parents (William Hurt and Marcia Gay Harden), to go slipping up to Alaska. Along the way you will cross with a pair of hippies, a farmer (Vaughn) and an old man (Hollbrook), to change the life. It is paradoxical that rebelling to the non-conformism into a default type of society is so sad consequences.Unlike other biopics, Penn uses a narrative structure that situated to Chris at his final destination, Alaska, and is interspersed with the different stages of the voyage with the voice-over of a delivered to form sister of the protagonist. This way of mixing so many resources may seem confusing but to me I found it more effectively. The past, present and future of Chris is joining as a puzzle to explain something so illogical as leave a life of money to live as a beggar backpacking. Those who hate both temporary jump course, will suffer a continuous torture.Another of the strong points of the film is his photography because as good road-movie landscapes are essential, and them here all together: the cruelest city, the most impressive beaches, more blue lakes and white whiter Alaska winter. The only thing that gives me doubts about 'Towards wild routes' is if its director not abused excessively from them, and the 140 minutes that lasts the history.Many spectators will seem pretentious way of drawing the most natural America, I've only noticed that some scenes are stretched unnecessarily because of both sky and forest, but never can tell the activist nº 1 for natural resources as is Sean Penn that he cut in the outer planes.The big surprise of the film, and something not expected is an Emile Hirsch is coming out, although the script by Penn has everything to make the kid look, as well as all those who surround him. William Hurt and the later Marcia Gay Harden left their mark as parents reckless and abusive, although his scenes are well few and leave without tying very well the theme of parents of Chris. Penn avoids show the agony of these to not interfere with the path of the protagonist, which is a broken link a near perfect plot.The side are luxury and there is where the movie has scratched its only nomination for the Oscars. Hal Holbrook displayed on screen and live the best 15 minutes of the tape. His dialogues with Hirsch produced a tenderness that transcends the screen and must confess that along with the farewell of the populous hippie, the relationship between elder and backpacking provoked an irrepressible River of tears that now makes my hair stand on end.I not forget the soundtrack and an Eddie Vedder that carries me next to Chris. For me, another success when put me the ball in the throat.Note that 'Wild routes towards' has seemed a peliculón, and is that who have passed that critical point where you upload more hopelessly to the wheel of life, see Cris courage and courage Fuera de serie, arriving directly at the head and above all to the heart. Excellent drama of a director so Maverick as its protagonist, but that many are them atragantará with both landscape made in USA. |
1,755 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/438 | Jose Contreras | Super Nacho | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Beat feísmo and dandruff to the very same Torrent in this "Super Nacho" that takes place in the world of lucha libre fighting. | After "Cars", the world of the film should have muted last a decade with regard to competitions and laurels. That should happen every time a brilliant mind shows everyone how thick that weaves. But it has not been the case, the world not only cinema has not removed the hat, but us pursued and harassed with two niceties on the world of the competition. will Ferrer looks like his Southern geniality with the framework of racing cars in "Last lap", and Jack Black surpasses feísmo and dandruff to the very same Torrent in this "Super Nacho" that takes place in the world of lucha libre fighting.I'm not saying that they are not worthy to see although I recommend experiences more cheerful, as, for example, to undergo a root canal, or most surprising, as, for example, listen to an interview with Carmen Sevilla.Jack Black will go down in the history of the cinema for having discovered that viewers always we are part of the losers (or underdogs) and want they earn when they pursue high as helping moms sick or orphaned children. The idea choice for casting a gorgeous nun complete with a touch of realism the social background of the work. |
1,756 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1329 | Matías Cobo | Apocalypto | 4 | 5 | muchocine | A magnificent Ribbon in all its audiovisual and interesting scaffolding in his account, clearly divided into two. | "A great civilization not is conquered from the outside until that has not destroyed itself from within", with this quote from the French historian w. Durant starts Mel Gibson's new movie. The prologue to a tape which is more crushing by its visual power is that his underlying message condensed in the previous quote. A risky bet by a director alien fashion industry or commercial interference. Because you have to be very out of all this to make a film about the end of the once powerful Mayan civilization, do so in yucatec and with a cast of actors without previous experience recruited from Mexico, New Mexico, Southern California, throughout Central America and Canada. And the result is a magnificent Ribbon in all its audiovisual and interesting scaffolding in his account, clearly divided into two: the presentation of the tribal life of a village, and the destruction of it at the hands of an invading force decimated by diseases which, with AWE, blamed the fury of their gods.Before that point, Gibson makes an approach with greater desire for possible verismo to the daily life of the members of a Mayan village: dedicated to hunting and raising their children. Take your time the film is to describe the life in which respect for the laws of nature and elders are revered as a source of wisdom. But the seeds of a terrible fate is already planted in the prologue when Jaguar Paw (Rudy Youngblood) provides for a fact that the restless during a day of hunting. For the first time in his life the fear seizes him strangely; an unpleasant feeling that his father warns him severely as if it were a plague can infect his people.And with fear he will attend the Viewer to the savage destruction of the village of Jaguar Paw. That's where a second part of the story begins more familiar to the Viewer, with the typical structure of a tape of action but, in this case, wrapped all over it by a few powerful images shot with the nerve who handles with absolute dexterity the language of cinema. The wealth of resources that are shot persecutions and struggles are hardly unique. And still not disappears in this part of the whole poetic halo.In this adrenalítica part of the footage, Paw will attend to the cruel destruction of his people and to the terrible neglect after being captured all adults. They will be driven to a large Mayan city in full decline, hit by the disease, corruption and slavery. Women will be sold as slaves, while the men will be driven to a great pirámide-altar to be sacrificed as offerings to Kukulkan, the great God of the Sun, who beg for an end to drought and pests. The fate, in the form of eclipse, saves the shoes to our protagonist, who has a powerful reason in his village to fight for his life until exhaustion.As if it were a hunt in which the roles of Hunter and prey invest constantly, Paw will be prosecuted by his captors once get escape. In this part, the general tone of the film, following the explicit violence is heightened. A violence that has caused many controversies, not only for being excessive to repulsion, but because those who are considered to be heirs of the past qualify the film as a defamation of the Mayan civilization.I do not know to what extent historical accuracy has faltered for succumbing to that side as 'gore' of Gibson. For example, in the article that link they talk about that describe "the Mayans as practitioners of human sacrifice,." to get the heart of the victim in a public spectacle at the top of a pyramid This was a ritual not maya and Aztec, a well-known fact for any student of Mesoamerican history (..) "." However, the story as a whole is more than notable and in his epilogue remacha the argument expressed in the appointment of Durant. |
1,757 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3494 | Ana Belén Pacheco | Adiós pequeña, adiós | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Some minor errors such as ending the first part of the tape very quickly leaving almost half of the footage for the outcome achieved the spectator to relax and lose part of their interest. Applause moderate for both Afflecks | I think that we have finally found the way to remove the map of mediocre actors Ben Affleck: let him go.Comparisons are odious and as he has chosen for his debut in the long an adaptation of the novel by Dennis Lehane, author of Mistic River, is unquestionable that tone, content and complaint must refer directly to Clint Eastwood and his work to measure this foray into the greater Affleck brother Thriller. And obviously quite worse standing although it manages to provide some consistency with this story about the search for the truth about the abduction of a girl to unravel the events surrounding his capture. Although it has been used the case of Madeleine to speak of her little has who see this film with the story of the disappearance of the English small so who wait to see the search of the girl child during the film will find a little upset.Casey Affleck get to be credible, much more that the elder brother, carrying the protagonism of the narration and surrounded by a handful of solvents and right side while the black and loaded with the address environment helps you to maintain the tension of the narrative with some dignity. To be one opera prima must acknowledge some merit, some minor errors as ending the first part of the tape very quickly leaving almost half of the footage for the outcome achieved the spectator to relax and lose part of their interest. Moderate for both Afflecks applause. |
1,758 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2213 | JLO | Shrek 2 | 3 | 5 | muchocine | With the same resources from the first, it is a good film that would be best Court if it was not his own shadow. | It is difficult from the come on, bear the heavy backpack to be the sequel to one of the best animated films of the history. Yes, Shrek won that right for being a film almost flawlessly and enjoyable for adults and children from beginning to end. Endearing characters, a child film but without forgetting the many winks for adults, with in addition a script solid and very entertaining. To this day a true classic in its genre.That Yes, the writers now bemoan not having left more open between the characters to be able to exploit, surprised the enormous success of the original which was already confirmed, has assured until a 4th Shrek. And they have every reason for concern. It is not that wit or action lacking. The visit of the couple of ogres to the House of the parents of her, shoots a lot of helpful situations. The inclusion of the fairy godmother as new villain is both original and surprising, but does not make us forget the incredible Lord Farquaad, the dwarf Prince of the first part.The music returns to stand out with versions of Tom Waits, Nick Cave and David Bowie, as well as references to other films which are many-the Lord of the rings, Barbie, the Little Mermaid, mission impossible - and the guest appearances - and gags - Pinocchio. Everything enjoyable and spectacular. The inclusion of the new character of Puss in boots rather than add, subtract. It overlaps with the work of the donkey by dividing the comic parts. With the same resources from the first, it is a good film that would be best Court if it was not his own shadow. Even repeated in the message pointed out that we should not make any difference, and less on love issues.The truth is that Puss in boots, with the neutral voice of Antonio Banderas and singing the trilladísima Livin' la vida loca. It is too much. Let us hope that the imminent Shrek the third lift in something the aim. |
1,759 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3272 | Naty Buqué | Inland empire | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Inland Empire is a visual, sound and intellectual experience. | Finally, when he only remained in Buenos Aires a single (and horrible, and distant) room to see Inland Empire, attended the function.I won't get the silly as often happens with criticisms of Lynch's movies. Talk about the camera, actions of the super flash to avoid the 'I did not understand anything, but is good'.I did not understand anything, but it is good.The film follows the typical structure lyncheana, where two or more diegetic levels come into play and mingle without prior notice. Another film that the viewer desentrañe with elements that are repeated in different 'levels' (which speaks of chaos or Association free or chamuyo in lynch does not understand anything: his films have more structure than the more typical dramón yankee). This time, however, believe it plays a little more and exits at the realism of the earlier films of this line (say lost Highway and Mulholland Drive), and already not we ourselves to the biplane realidad-sueño but that we are moving into something much more complex that could be defined as a triad (realidad-sueño - fiction) Although it may be more correct to think of two biplanes: realidad-sueño, realidad-ficción. If this is added the fact that fiction is that of a film, then adds the complexity involved in the film within the film.What I think is that finally the film is not resolved in the realism of a schizophrenic having nightmares, but history is more open towards a fantastic paranoid or something. To ensure this, however, her he would twice more.On the other hand, experimentation with digital camera opens many doors to Lynch, and if you lose the tidiness of Mulholland Drive, left the greater variety of movements of camera, image quality, lens and even picture, contributing to the distinction of the levels that are playing. This holds also largely in the codes of the characters acting, trait very interesting to analyze (which, of course, I will not do).Another thing I would like to highlight of the film is the brilliant use of rather violent images. I'm the first ethical voice against free of violence in film and main antagonist of the Hostel type rubbish found in this film an empirical test for arguing that it is not violence per is that bothers me on the screen. Lynch uses visual violence: the film has even a bit of masturbatorio enjoy the physical suffering of the other, the blood, the imminent death. And it works. I, at least, as a spectator, suffered such scenes (and not.) by disgust but by anxiety (The destroyed meat became, in the lynch House, shattered meat of a subject).There are several things to mention. The self reference, even the autoparodia; the excellent performances; the photography of puta madre. And safer than other things that I was forgetting.Best of all, however, is to see this film is an experience in itself, and an individual experience. You can see 4 times and understand the plot, that is not the crux of the matter. The best is entering the film without the plot import, let perceive the imágenes-tópico he spoke Deleuze to find pure images, enjoy this, think of things in relation to the image and not necessarily in relation to the meaning of the actions that take place in that image and related to (the rest of the actions that take place in) the entire film.Exactly that. Inland Empire is a visual, sound and intellectual experience. |
1,760 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1309 | Matías Cobo | Hollywoodland | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Do a more than remarkable film to know the bitter back hidden under the? glamour? and the luxury of those golden years of cinema. | The dirt of the shining world of stars have not always washed at home. At times, the film industry has airy their own shames through what better do: movies. Probably on the cusp of this theme work is always the classic Wilder Sunset Boulevard (the twilight of the gods). Also Robert Altman (in the game of Hollywood) portrayed the misery of those directing the roost of this factory of illusions capable of generating so much garbage inside doors with acidity. Hollywoodland, first feature of the television Director Allen Coulter (12 episodes of the Sopranos and one of A six feet under, among other series, guarantee you), is also a story about these sinks based on the sad true story of the murder-suicide of George Reeves, actor who became famous for his role in the series the adventure of Superman.La strange death of Reeves to 45 years of age always lent to various scenarios. The? official? He came to say that the actor, embittered by his typecasting in the television role of Superman and after giving to finished his career as a film actor, decided to put an end to his life of a shot. But doubts never came to dissipate, and surrounding them tour the central nucleus of Hoollywoodland. A private detective without major cases on his table, Louis Simo (Adrien Brody), sees the perfect occasion to lift flight given the far-reaching media of the case in this investigation. But, as he explores the life of Reeves, more parallels can be found with his own personal drama: divorced his wife, with a son that little known and a mistress/Secretary that fool you. Thus, sequences of life of Reeves mingle with Simo and tone of thriller of the research with the drama of the histories of both characters.The work of Coulter in the realization is neat, but the best of this tape are magnificent interpretations of the cast. Starting with the best job in the career of Ben Affleck, an actor that some already doubted that it possessed such a condition. The Californian won the Volpi Cup and was nominated in the Golden Globe on a paper full of nuances to give life to Reeves, "an man? do says Affleck?" They called him?"Do the honest george?, and tried to always let move well to others, though in a sense it was to feel loved himself". Also adds the actor, who was thoroughly documented for his character, who "was generous and borrowed more money than actually had (?)" but was not perfect; "it was ambitious and impatient and may be something superficial." The rest of the cast, Adrien Brody is as well as almost always, something that is not news in his case, a gorgeous Diane Lane demonstrates that improves as actress as a good wine and Bob Hoskins returns to exhibit his talent for a usual role therein, of the fearsome big fish that does not threaten in vain. Do do in short, a remarkable film to know the bitter back hidden under the? glamour? and the luxury of those golden years of cinema. |
1,761 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2742 | Kiko de España | Mr Brooks | 2 | 5 | muchocine | At times it seems basic instinct and at times any Demi Moore movie, but does not stop working despite the (hedging) police plot and because the surprise factor is zero... | He was eager to see this movie. Kevin Costner has been very great and his version of Robin Hood is excellent, as his Eliot Ness and his Garrison in John His co-stars here are Willam Hurt, it seems that from A history of violence is always the same role and Demi Moore. What happens is that here the three roles could be invested and nothing would happen, would not mind who is the poli, the villain or "the other".In Mr. Brooks Costner is a schizophrenic addicted to the murder, but that isn't a spoiler because the first 90 seconds of film make it clear.At times it seems basic instinct and at times any Demi Moore movie, but does not stop working despite the (hedging) police plot and because the surprise factor is zero. Impeccable invoice, is the classic movie for cuarentonas couples come to the cinema in mass and "alucinen" with what it does Kevin Costner, will like as liked another movie for the public: American beauty.I don't know if you will be pleased to marriage which put his son Kevin Costner in Jesús. I was going to be approved by the hairs, but there is a ultraridículo Shootout at the last minute that makes it lose the little credibility that had. |
1,762 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2211 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | Half Nelson | 3 | 5 | muchocine | There is nothing to say against this film, although it is not a masterpiece. Even a great movie, but is made with great sense of dignity, lovingly written and filmed without enfatismos. Its theme being so rugged, that - in these times of hyperrealism and dizziness film - is very, very welcome. | One learns to live with their sins and it is possible to achieve even lower of drama, forbidding them, consent that part are the life or that it is scarcely possible to repent of them, losing in the redemption or be sufficiently cynical to display them unprejudiced. There are lives escoradas to the tragedy, certain fatalism and others, frugal, that do not pass of the mediocrity of the grey and plumbous tedium. The life of the history teacher portrayed in this interesting Half Nelson is one of those which it coexists with their sins, save them in private corners and endures the days as good you can. Toxicómano, idealistic, sensitive and, above all, it is utopian. In fact the film does blood in drugs, although it could well do. In fact, there is no intolerable scenes. The drug world is drawn very tangentially: Dan Dunne (a sober and convincing Ryan Goslip) is not the addict sold by Hollywood to use productions. In fact, the film moves away with great discretion the gender and emphasizes more sociological or even political aspects than mere shots of crack or cocaine to show us how hung is the teacher, to which in two-faced Janus displays two sides of the same person: passionate teacher, aware of the absolute privilege of teaching and the fundamental value of the material at hand (human form)(, adolescents who see his pedagogy illusions to live better and habits of conduct regulated to live better in that society) and infamous human self-destructive, abandoned in a cubbyhole in which drug such as read a verse of Baudelaire (precisely Baudelaire) or listen a languid blues of Billie Holiday (precisely Billie Holiday). If something I liked the movie, even in its default, in his little attractive approach, is occasionally by his utter lack of ambitions. There is no gruesomeness. There are no surprises. Nor that pornography of needle and vein that, in other cases, color throughout the film and does not allow us to glimpse details. There are no superfluous chromatics: all agree to a grammar accurate, alien to any kind of subjectivity. The merit of the film by Ryan Fleck lies in acting sobriety of the 2 main characters: the painfully human master and pupil was devastated by a difficult world (brother in jail, money shortage crisis of personality) and suddenly finallly to him to help him lift the slump, whose wisdom and balance allows the rough teacher avizore a better future and recompose their vital State and their desire to be in this world. Ryan Goslip lost the Academy Award for best actor at the recent gala. It is not a role that like for a very narrow-minded Academy, but he deserved. Its says, is also easily arrumbable to the easy ground of fierce criticism, is that abuse of the camera in hand, that tired, really, but that maybe best for framing that world nervous, fragile, broken into a thousand pieces that condenses in the poisoned minds of the master. And tiredness, sometimes their images, not never override the viewer and leave him in a huge limbo of ideas, but sometimes little nuanced. It seems that it is a film that requires, as I wanted to Umberto Eco for its open work, an engaged reader, a spectator alert does not lose any message and can then find sense to all them and amalgamate them into a compact whole. If you get a peliculón. It can that Penza aren't neither prepared nor eager to dig so much that, on the surface, does not require so much dissection. |
1,763 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4260 | Francisco Bellón | Juno | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Juno is the quota of independent in this awards season film, because the film itself has nothing to make descatar on the other. | For four years, always be has finished brewing an independent film between favorite face award in United States. Lost in Translation, between cups, Crash, good night and good luck, or little Miss Sunshine has been the most recent examples.In this year, representative of independent in the face of cinema to the Oscar has been Juno, and although it seems somewhat cruel such description, is the truth. This must be understood in its context, and is that very few times the awards and nominations are fair. At a glance, Juno can be seen as the typical film of adolescents or a realistic comedy and intelligent in the most pejorative sense of the term. The truth is that it is more the latter than the former, although there are a lot of common and topical sites, and a complete absence of intelligent humor in the screenplay by Diablo Cody. The script also highlights, surprisingly, by its kitsch and fussiness, both in the development and evolution of blurred characters and their language. Jason Reitman has lost the acid and biting vision demonstrated in thank you for smoking, and adheres to the prudish and idealized vision of American society that offers the screenplay by Diablo Cody (the sequence in the Association pro abortion is just sonrojante). For its part, Ellen Page, however making an interpretation of the most natural, lively and fresh, does not justify the nomination has won the Oscar.Juno Award is the quota of independent in this awards season film, because the film itself has nothing to make descatar on the other. It is a hybrid between the typical comedy of teenagers and a high comedy full of irony and subtlety. |
1,764 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/195 | Victor Omar | El código Da Vinci | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Underestimate the intelligence of the public is the worst sin of the film | Over the years we have been devoting full time to the world of cinema, we have learned many unwritten rules. One of them has to do with the tapes that have caused much excitement before reaching Billboard. If that film in question, the time of the premiere, the Distributor chooses to hide it in the press, it is almost certain that they do that the media do not have opportunity to speak ill of her. Reasons: the long-awaited film in the end is not at all good, but if the public does not know, attendance at cinemas will not be diminished.And unfortunately this premise is fulfilled in "code Da Vinci". Too solemn, too cold, too politically correct. Much ado about nothing about a too conventional thriller. "Code Da Vinci" is in good measure, with the exception of its final part, a sort of almost literal figurative representation of the book that inspired him. As if it were a graphical version of the text, which includes literal transcriptions of some dialogue or key expressions and refers strictly to the description of actions, in the recurring flashbacks and adjusted description of his characters, perhaps visible except for the Manager banking André Vernet.Howard leverages the privilege to have been able to shoot the opening sequence in Louvre himself to handle from the go with strong pulse and sobrado tanning craft Narrator the suggestive atmosphere of intrigue that seems to accentuate it while more grows the hieroglyph - tired known by the disclosure that claimed the book - raised before the noses of the expert simbologista Robert Langdon (Tom Hanks) and the young full of French police Sophie Neveu (Audrey Tautou): the death of the curator of the Louvre - and grandfather of the girl old man revives a secret deployed around the work of Leonardo da Vinci and which might call into question the foundations of Christianity and the power of the Iglesia.Es no doubt that, if the Brown book had not existed, no Hollywood studio would have put money to convert in film so thick script built almost exclusively on explanations and (somewhat) fanciful speculations about symbols, codes, secret cults, history of religion and messages disguised as art, presumed by the unique appeal of putting into question the fundamental principles of Christianity.Conspiracy theories lose value and credibility for the manner in which they are presented.The explanation that makes the last supper, the box of Da Vinci, Sir Teabing (Ian McKellen) is suitable for minds trained by Barney the dinosaur. Underestimate the intelligence of the public is the worst sin of the film. History, thus moving through solving puzzles, detection of codes and the display of historical knowledge but not the construction of characters, designed more with idiosyncrasies that personalities of flesh and blood.A generous director of actors, Howard is usually not able here to provide an identity to its partner lead, which remains false, pale, rigid and deadpan. In a movie so full of hot air, there is no room for that, or emotion or style. Film is the most impersonal of Ron Howard, a filmmaker with ex officio but not talented, which although it has sent some skids career always was you could trust a couple of hours with total confidence. "No longer.""Code Da Vinci" (version film and book) is a sign of the eternal conflict between historians and novelists. If the novel or the film accurately reflect reality, then is her accused of not being a novel because it contains no fiction. And sometimes plagiarism, because logically the novelist has to be based on the study of historical sources. "And if it disfigures the facts in fiction, then charged that he is not saying the truth, he distorted what happened.""Code Da Vinci" is not intended to be history, history is not, and therefore may ficcionar the facts, inventing a new reality, although some facts are taken from history. What is true and what is fiction a novel is a privilege of the novelist. If you write a pasted argument of historical reality, perhaps would be rather a chronicle. And yet, in the Chronicles there is also a large part of imagination by who writes.Regardless of everything, it is ridiculous that in 21st century, hierarchs of various Christian doctrines as the Catholic Church and Governments such as the Philippines, Thailand or the India forbid the display of the Ribbon, for things while they are not entirely true, somehow threatening to think people, which would lead to that also reach sooner or later question your realitywhich is very dangerous for those who wish to have the masses under control. |
1,765 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3566 | Andrés Pons | No es país para viejos | 5 | 5 | muchocine | No country for old men is a happy reunion with his early works discussed, a return to the roots of violence dry with disturbing characters embodied by brilliant actors. | Some authors after seeing jeopardize their careers decide to return to the cinema of its principles. The COEN brothers wore two comedies well below expectations of a few filmmakers always well recognized.Intolerable Cruelty and THE LADYKILLERS meant an alarming decline in the talent demonstrated on previous occasions, especially in film noir that provided on the principles of his filmography with titles as significant as easy blood, death among the flowers and more recently the memorable Fargo. NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN is a happy reunion with his early works discussed, a return to the roots of violence dry with disturbing characters embodied by brilliant actors.Javier Barden sicario seems you can repeat nomination to the oscar after earlier that night falls, the winner of the Academy Award TOMMI LEE JONES for the fugitive shows sobriety that is customary. Accompanied by two other large actors of always grateful presence in the faces of JOSH BROLIN who we saw recently in PLANET TERROR and the great WOODY HARRELSON with great performances in his filmography with ex officio assassins or the series CHEERS.All of them in full State of grace in a perfect film full of strength, with excellent dialogues, perfect in all technical aspects, in a brilliantly constructed script that provides us with the return to the mastery of some great as always will be the Coen brothers. |
1,766 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2649 | Hombre Lobo | Planet Terror | 4 | 5 | muchocine | It is likely that the continual allusions to other cult films complete bored spectators on average, but it is because we are talking about a tape that is simply not designed for that kind of Viewer. | Two films comprising Grindhouse are the apotheosis of these times of simulation in which we live, the orgasm of the culture of the copy and the referential freak, the same ultra-revisionista spirit that makes every two to three us remakes of old classics or blatant plagiarism claiming to pass by the GLib label of the "tribute" or "parody". However, in the case of the two tapes that make up this strange experience, it shows the good Office of this pair of onanistas geeks named Robert Rodriguez and Quentin Tarantino, who to date have not had problems to recognize that his films are pastiches of other films, mosaics impregnated with his personal style and that they allow them to showcase their moviegoers tastes each time that it gives them the win. In this sense, Planet Terror (2007) as Death Proof (2007) are two samples of this trend that is gives so much lately of "Let's play I do _ film" (replace the blank space by any genre that want). The difference is that, contrary to most of those who have participated in this re - re-recycling of past ideas, these types know what they want to achieve and (most importantly) how to achieve this. See 'Planet Terror', one of the first things that come to mind is the second half of open until dawn (1996), film that (confess) has always seemed to me a tape of the heap whose excessive cult not ever understand. However, on this occasion, at being free of his colleague Tarantino style and with carte blanche to develop a history of zombies to your tastes, Robert Rodriguez has been rid of the ballast that inhibited his previous story of vampires, to get to gloat in this absurd that both abounds in his filmography and offer a correct display of cinematic sources that has earned. And it is that almost everything in Planet Terror takes the Viewer to a reference or allusion to which no choice but to receive with open arms. Those who read this know (obviously) that the iconic image of the film, the go-go dancer on the leg of submachine gun, is the female complement to the figure of Ash, the hero of the Evil Dead 2 (1987) facing the undead with a chainsaw attached to the stump of his mutilated hand, but that is only the tip of the iceberg: here from the minimalist music style John Carpenter to passages taken directly from Lucio Fulci or George Romero, without of course forgetting that range of characters as likeable as absurd (the go-go dancer with aspirations of comedian, the sadistic anesthesiologist, the mercenary with the jar full of human testicles, the demented Kangaroo twin or that fearless villain played by a priceless Bruce Willis with knob). These references, however, are not simple filling: are the soul of the film (1).And it is that if we add to that the technical deficiencies intentionally incorporated into the tape, we realize that Robert Rodriguez has gone for all in its segment of Grindhouse, creating not only an experience the sea of entertaining, but also one of its more round films, regardless of their similarities or not with a film phenomenon that we only know of ear (without wanting to sound pedantic)(, I believe that it is necessary to remember that both I and 90 percent of the people who read these lines is too young to have witnessed this type of shows).It is likely that after an hour and a half of footage, the excesses of Robert Rodriguez can be somewhat cansones. In the same way, it is likely that the continual allusions to other cult films complete bored spectators on average, but it is because we are talking about a tape that is simply not designed for that kind of Viewer. As all private joke, Planet Terror is only valid within his tight circle of freak, and only a spectator to abandon any cynicism at the gate can enjoy jokes, the incogruencias, the chaotic Assembly, casposos dialogues and that distilled blood for comic effect. The new creature from Robert Rodriguez may not be for everyone, and can also be very far (in my opinion) deserve the enthronement which has been given months before your arrival, but there is no denying that it is one of the more enjoyable this season premieres, and by far.(1) There is a scene which for me sums it up very well: is the time in which one of the military (not coincidentally played by Quentin Tarantino), after seeing on TV a fragment of this pillar of the "sexplotación" prison called Women in individualizing (1971), decides to rape the girls that keeps prisoners, and interestingly enough you can see in the monitor of to the side. Without much effort, this scene shows much of the explotativo spirit of the Grindhouse experience. |
1,767 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2543 | El vengador toxico | Harry Potter y la orden del Fénix | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The film progresses smoothly, flowing through the course and stations without sudden jumps. I do not know if it is that I expected something worse after read criticisms, but to me I liked and I I recommend to all. | You know all that premiered the fifth part of Harry Potter. In my case the first three saw before reading the books, the fourth almost simultaneously and this is what I see enough after reading it. So the first thing is going to be abstracted from the book to avoid comparisons. Obviously, given that a two-hour film script are about 120 pages, cannot be expected to be the "entire" book. Important thing is to see if the script has its own entity or advances to catch-up.As you know the readers of the saga, and imagine fans of the films, the story begins in the last days of summer and runs throughout a school year in the school of wizards of Hogwarts.En this case is highly recommended having seen the previous, to know the outcome and to understand the references to it in this film. And according to this, those responsible have been eliminated completely return to explain the small "ordinary" magical things that have been seen in previous films.To be able to put the criticism, perhaps it is good to put my opinion on the previous movies (again, about the movies, not on whether they are more or less faithful). The first two are highly recommended films, with a target audience of children, but that others moved as the vision of a boy who discovers a magical new world with surprise. Good movies, the pace is somewhat calm. It is the third where Alfonso Cuarón think more tenebrist Gothic surroundings with a much more dynamic and absorbing script. For me an absolute peliculón. The fourth in the series grew in spectacular, but the script wasn't so round and progressed to saltos.¿Y how is the new? Sure you read criticism saying that it is loose. However for me not moving in the fall (great news after the fiasco of sequels of this year) and even I liked a bit more than the fourth, even without reaching the level of the third.The film focuses on the decision-making power of the Ministry of magic on Hogwarts, maligning Harry Potter and Albus Dumbledore to say that Lord Voldemort has returned. The seizure of power customize in the odious Dolores Umbridge, fluted voiced, his eccentricities and his cruelty focus on Harry. This, with a number of colleagues, will try to prepare for the return of the Dark Lord.As I have noted, the film progresses smoothly, flowing through the course and stations without sudden jumps. The progressive weakness of Dumbledore and his followers will guide us towards the spectacular end.By the way (a subsection about the books), the lack of explanations of the spells in the film makes that the fighting are more "balanced", without that annoying feeling that flies in the books that good magicians are Patsies (you can read my opinion in Harry Potter and the half-blood Prince).As for the actors, sadly Ron and Hermione decrease its prominence, even playing a role of novel teen flirting. The role of Dolores Umbridge (wonderful Imelda Staunton, is completely odious) reduces the role of common characters, such as Sirius Black, Severus Snape or the own Dumbledore, but also of new (as Helena Boham Carter). The truth is given time to have less paper many of which were common, but is what we have to pay to maintain the agility of the film.I do not know if it is that I expected something worse after read criticisms, but to me I liked and I I recommend to all.PS: Supposed her they shown in Imax 3D, but yesterday certainly wasn't on the Bulletin Board of the Imax Madrid. |
1,768 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1435 | Marta | María Antonieta | 2 | 5 | muchocine | At first the film promises, but ends up being very "pop" wrapper with little content. | I note that I am not one of those people who love to Sofia Coppola and all that it does. "Lost in Translation", although Nice aesthetically, it seems simploncilla, and history find it me very irritating with a tipa suffering for their holidays paid in Tokyo and much messing of American-in-Japan on the curious are Asians and how bad that speak English. "The Virgin suicides" yes I liked, but clear, the film adapts with great fidelity the beautiful novel by Jeffrey Eugenides, so it does not count. In general, I think that the Coppola is very overrated and it works in what works, largely thanks to being the daughter of who is. On the other hand, they may not like those movies that play with current elements in contexts or environments of other times, and I think "Romeo+Julieta" and "Moulin Rouge", Baz Luhrmann, more as a failed experiment than as anything other. Having said all that, I suppose it is not surprising to say that I went to see "Marie Antoinette" without waiting for nothing more than a display of modernita which might be its Director. And, to be honest, at first I thought that I had made a mistake. At first, the thing promised, and while it is true that details as music or hairstyles to layers are not too stringent - or pretend to be him-, was not something that called the attention unduly or is annoying. At the beginning, clear. It is then completely hand and begins the "anything goes", with dances showing the soundtrack of way too obvious or own advertising scenes. There who about to appear some Converse will find very funny. I guess it is, but it is also certainly representative of what the film: long "pop" wrapper and little content. And, to make matters worse, during long time. Because that is another: "Marie Antoinette" goes through long "phases". The phase in which nothing matters more than her virginity and his enmity with the mistress of the King, the stage music, cakes and colorful, the bucolic phase "sheep and garden", and so until the end - precipitadísimo, by the way-. Jumping from one thing to another without any coherent, even purely formal connection. Finally, that despite its careful image, this reinterpretation of the story of the famous Queen I didn't. In fact, I think it is the worst thing that has made the Director. But I have already noticed that I am not one of those people who worship Sofia Coppola? |
1,769 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4128 | JLO | Soy leyenda | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Happy compassionate ending fails to ruin I am Legend although she makes it unfinished and they also told me that the end of the book by Matheson is more lucid, solid and recordable. | Speaking of I am legend, the first film tank of the year, is not only outline details of its strengths and weaknesses (though then do so). It is to speak of a film succeeded and failed, an experience found sensations and is to speak first of its director.Many times ninguneada the work of the filmmaker for the importance of other factors such as a famous book (of Richard Matheson's 1954 of the same name), a box office actor (Will Smith, more mature here than usual in its prolific FX tapes) and even other previous versions with Vincent Price and Charlton Heston in the leading. Speaking of Francis Lawrence is speaking of hits in a genre that is prone to excesses (Director of the also successful Constantine). His desolate New York is oppressive, his camera in hand provides nerve in its first half and not wallows solving subtlety with the death of the protagonists empathetic of the film. The good use of the flashbacks give the necessary information and they do not complicate the plot, religiosity does not bother by the naif of dialogues (God loves us us so we love him?) as if did it at times in his previous film. It is just also thank that patriotism is not present despite being a military the protagonist and on black top (not proliferate the classical flags starry wind). The story is simple and reminds others, a lone hero in fight with beings vampirizados where the epidemic unleashed, here and now, translates into a clear allusion to HIV and its current expansion. They are all cliches (calls by radio in search of survivors, search for supplies, pet friendly, etc) even the cartoon symbol Argentina El Eternauta trafficking a similar event with more strength and height if you want to. And here we reach the comparisons with extermination (28 days later), 2002 become inevitable because of too many characteristics in common. That WINS by desolation, the proximity of bodies infected without any digitization, for its elegance and its end. Now we understand Danny Boyle and its multiple endings, as if they were necessary for sincerity and as if he understood the business to all leave happy. Happy compassionate ending fails to ruin I am Legend although she makes it unfinished and they also told me that the end of the book by Matheson is more lucid, solid and recordable. But the Chief merit of I am legend is returned in good shape the film of genre (does science fiction? do Thriller? do suspense?) into a film to flow, which is honest, that achieves both and perhaps unwittingly, the pleasure and the desire to see cinema in the film (which is not little).PS: There is No bombastic music that remarque climates, only the story of Bob Marley and his legend CD used as leiv motiv of the film and the references to the comics are delicious (posters of the "future" Batman/Superman and another of the Green Lantern movie!) |
1,770 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/687 | Caruco | Infiltrados | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Just a good film that contributes little to the universe?Scorsese? or gender. Accept their status as mere entertainment and employs the excesses (too) easily. | Martin Scorsese goes back to the "bad streets", and if in "Gangs of New York", mid-19th century, the fledgling metropolis was a hotbed of Irish, Italians and native gangs, certifies that 150 years later, even Boston rather than the city of skyscrapers, things have gone worse.The spectrum of rivalries has extended to African-American, Hispanic, Asian gangs (or Eastern). And that "rats", struggling for their piece of the territory, not only walk in the slums but also also in the highest levels of power.Something is happening to ensure American film registration either in political correctness or in anger and more radical violence. The drama "Crash" already we submergía in the Tinderbox of tension of the city of Los Angeles. And curious is that another very recent film, tiny budget, as "Crank: poison in the blood", a sovereign stupidity or an oscuras parodies of the genre?, share many elements with "Infiltrators" in common: from a hectic pace, to jokes easy about sex, violence without limits, foul language, blood, Adrenaline and even levels of cercenadas hands.Clear that "Infiltrators" is Bill bright, his impeccable rhythm, the cast of bells and their quality seems beyond doubt.Essentially, he has proposed us the game of cat and mouse between two moles, one within the organized crime, Billy Costigan (Leonardo DiCaprio); and another, Collin Sullivan (Matt Damon), within the police. Do the two sides of the same coin, and the difference between the? valiums? that takes Costigan and the luxury apartment and the bride of your dreams that achieves Sullivan.Convincente is DiCaprio, which already showed in "The Aviator" its worth for tormented characters and who plays here a gift anyone who can settle at any corner or bar. And equally remarkable Matt Damon, very committed, which knows how to hide the State of spirit and concern behind his eyes. Although the heart will explode throbbing, you need to know to maintain the strong pulse! Do and I would say Costigan/DiCaprio.Un point apart is Jack Nicholson, as the? capo? Frank Costello. Or rather, the festival"Nicholson, who enjoys as a child expressing themselves in grimaces and uncouth language, hinting the sadistic tendencies of his character, and both with their luxury amiguitas diviertiéndose as atosigando demure priests and nuns. The same Nicholson escaped the control of the William Monahan, director, and screenwriter rewriting much of their dialogue and expand the weight of his character. On the other hand, Mark Whalberg becomes the true revelation of the stellar cast.Do separate Nicholson should be noted than most moments and most significant scenes of "infiltrators", included a sudden and bewildering final surprise, were already in "Infernal affairs" (here titled "Dirty game" for its DVD Premiere), the film? made in Hong Kong? on which it is based.If anything in "Infernal affairs" spent years for the protagonists and they were identifying more and more with its surroundings and colleagues, making more explicit the phrase pronounced the mafioso Costello (Jack Nicholson) on which a loaded hand gun there is no difference between who is the thief and who the police. "Infiltrators", is of course, imprinted with the label "Scorsese". A show of more than two hours and a half very entertaining, is visually attractive, strong, full of nerve, manly, and a lesson in mounting, Thelma Schoonmaker, Scorsese collaborator. Also misogynist worldwide which portrays. Only correct is the main female presence, Vera farmiga, whose best scene is an homage, in flat general short, "The third man".The original English title "The departed", more metaphysical (the only time the word is in a tomb), refers to those who "departed", those who have left us. Speaks of the dead, but also the living of their own hell in the city, and perhaps embarked on a journey without return.But it goes "more" to "less". The expectations raised before a great movie or a masterpiece not met. It ends up being just a good movie that brings little to the universe "Scorsese" or gender. Accepts his status as mere entertainment and resorts (too) easily excesses or a mise en scene designed to dazzle. |
1,771 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/961 | Oscar Cantero | Irresistible | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Irresistible (though perhaps should be called unbearable) | Ann Turner is one of those directors with little filmography behind him that is well accompanied by some heavyweight industry. Otherwise it is incomprehensible that it will count for one of his early work with actors of the prestige of Sam Nelly and above all, Susan Sarandon. So far it has shown a rather limited talent and his films seem more TV movies than genuine film productions. And is that Irresistible is a by-product that not even the talent of its protagonists manages to rescue of mediocrity, and the only thing really irresistible in this film are the desire which you enter of leave the room shortly after start. It is a kind of drama with a touch of suspense, or upside down, nor could tell it exactly. The plot revolves around a woman who thinks that intends the companion of her husband working to stay with his house, his car and even her husband. The anguish experienced on the widespread belief that is paranoid represent the central focus of the film. The tempo cansino and monotonous, joined a virtually flat script make Irresistible a vulgar movie that surely will pass without penalty or glory through the charts, and that no one will remember few hours after seeing. Susan Sarandon, which seems to have fallen into disgrace and lacks lately to major studios, having to settle for minor like this productions deserves special mention. Perhaps the most appropriate site for Irresistible is the shelf of video clubs; But yes, well cornered, lest someone be confused and her rent. Although each is free to throw the money as it sees fit. |
1,772 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1229 | Yojimbo | La joven del agua | 4 | 5 | muchocine | A story with a great deal of hope and good intentions. | Lady in the water in a few words, is a tale to the Tim Burton with a great deal of hope and good intentions to the Frank Capra. While the marketing surrounding the film sold the film of terror, the new Shyamalan is a story in every rule, a tale for adults who want to be children again and find an opportunity with a haunting Bryce Dallas Howard. Paul Giamatti, an actor of luxury after a few memorable roles in between drinks, Cinderella man or American Splendor, is disillusioned and humble protagonist acting smug way but which later became one of the most tireless fighters for "the cause".With inevitable reference to the war of Iraq, Shyamalan film is the less Shyamalan career (in the absence of the protected view). The good/bad managers is to have identity or plot tics which tend to repeat throughout his filmography, and in this case it is pleasant that almost everything you fear throughout the film (the typical questions of whether will be dead, if there will have been a leap in time, etc?) is not fulfilled: "what you see is what is". There is also a fierce criticism of the film critics, who portrays as destructive pessimistic that they pursue their prejudices.It is essential, after the forest, James Newton Howard talk about when working with this director. Each time I give more laps and I think that, while finding Neverland is a fabulous score, the work of Howard should win the statuette. It is certainly his best work, but with Lady in water it seems that you want to recover or take advantage of this masterful squandered creative for this film. Obviously not "being reached", but it manages to thrill. It should be noted the time I think most emotive film that the disk is titled as The Healing. Take note.To give you an idea of where is the director, I reproduce the phrase that appears at the end of the roll of end credits: "for my daughters." I will tell you this story once more. "But then you go to bed." A delicious tale with very few "buts". |
1,773 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1736 | Iñaki Bilbao | Descubriendo a los Robinsons | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Enjoyable film of animation of the fantasy genre, endowed with a marvelous music conducted by the always excellent Danny Elfman, and an admirable design. I think it is worthwhile, even if it is an improved job. | Good film cartoons, somewhat extravagant, as the family Robinson which gives rise to the tíutulo. It is full of great ideas to everyone more imaginative. It does have a good time and has positive teachings. However, if this is true, I think it fails him somewhat the pace and used tones. Its development is uneven, resulting the description of the above family Robinson worse, as my seems, from the film.Describe the characters too rapidly, with a chaotic pace and showing too much detail to be appreciated in detail. What happens is that this description has vital importance for the film total understanding, as evidenced in its very nice final.The best is what is happening in the present, rather than in the future, which, in principle, it might seem paradoxical, not in vain more imaginative might expect to happen in the coming years. But it is not, perhaps Yes visually, but not in emotion and fun. In the future, the fight with the dinosaur is very well, the rest, not so much. At present, however, we are witnessing several frankly worthy scenes, such as the fair of science, the moment in which we discover the true personality of the "man of the bowler", or the beautiful epilogue.However, and despite the decompensation, is an enjoyable tape of animation of the fantasy genre, endowed with a marvelous music conducted by the always excellent Danny Elfman, and an admirable design. I think it is worthwhile, even if it is an improved job. |
1,774 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2017 | Tyler | La cosecha | 1 | 5 | muchocine | It is boring and predictable, and above you eja a final open to a sequel that not is if it will be. The success of the movie was not at all expected. | Really expected me a director as Stephen Hopkins, who made movies as great as "Predator 2" or "Fly por los Aires" gave us a movie, although it was somewhat more effective.The theme of the movie is uninteresting, is something that everybody heard talk: Biblical plagues. Above they don't stop repeat it to you in the movie, and this makes get bored, because you are continually saying that it will happen then, and you know that it comes. then you think "well, alomejor is in the as tell it me", but neither, because the realization of Hopkins in this film is absolutely flat. Hillary Swank does not seem to have much éxto despite his two Oscar, gives the impression, perhaps erroneous, for that is not consolidated as "Star". Still, his interpretation is the more notable of the film. He does with his character can, and he gives something of interest. Even the special efecctos work, are of more plastic. The blood is not credible and rare strange visions. It is as if a vague malaise nothing advisable in this kind of films it produce in the Viewer. It's funny, because the make-up of FX are responsible to the genius who made this peliculón is "Abuerto Hasta el Amanecer", Greg Niccotero.Nunca know that really will the movie, if it is about pests or find a lost girl. The horror film uses too much lately on the subject of children. one is tired, embucha of children. Here the girl is that of "A bridge to Terabithia", with the face of "the small premium which announces Plystation makes some años2.." not be if the remember.It is boring and predictable, and above you eja a final open to a sequel that not is if it will be. The success of the movie was not at all expected.A few years ago that reaches us horror movies produced by Joel Silver, who regained his super Empire thanks to the "Matrix" trilogy. Recently he founded a subproductora to finance terror fils. "House on Haunted Hill", "13 ghosts". None of them very successfully with the exception of the pitch which was the first.If there is something that can highlight, is the time in which a number of moths accidentes attacked a House. It is a rather comical moment as how you look. It is a version with the end of "The birds" bugs... most own a comedy than a movie would be. To my me more pegaria that scene in an ochentera movie type "Ghostbusters", that for ICLS, we should wait for the third installment, this time without Bill Murray (shit!) and the magnificent Ben Stiller starting as his son. |
1,775 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3854 | Calaf | Soy leyenda | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Entertaining, well done, without excess of action... more than interesting. | I have not read the book, which as nearly any adaptation, desmerecerá it, but as a film it is a more than decent story, balanced, with the fair times between action and feelings of loneliness of a Will Smith great expressions, in addition to cuadrao.Who know New York, alucinará with scenes of ghost town.Made a more explicit narrative in lack what is wrong in the cure of cancer, and some deeper flashbacks. Also some consistency in the zombies who come to insinuate feelings (thought that the leader was going for his girl).A story that is not lost in action excessive with very good sequences as the dogs and that keeps you interested and entertaining from beginning to end. Worth the entry. |
1,776 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/606 | Javier Saz | Saraband | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Ingmar Bergman us giddy with truths as fists, naked humans, put out of their misery, our miseries. | "Saraband" is one of the films that has most impacted me in recent times, not be as qualified, whether melodrama or Horror. Such is the impact on my memory. Ingmar Bergman us giddy with truths as fists, naked humans, put out of their misery, our miseries.The grandiose Liv Ullmann (Marianne), reunited after thirty years with Johan, a former ex-marido (returning to the characters of "Secrets of a marriage"), and in the House also spend the summer the son of Johan Henrik, the daughter of this, Karin. Relationships are conflicts, hatred between parents and children, humiliation, lie, fear. Bergman seeks the worst of human beings and shows it shamelessly nude. Johan despises his son Henrik for its soft character and appearance. Henrik hates his father for his humiliation and contempt. The women of Henrik died two years ago, and Henrik has failed, only relies on her daughter Karin, which teaches to play the cello. Karin wants to go to the city, to the Conservatory, but knows that if his father leaves this die from penalty. Uff, and this only approach. Then contains really chilling scenes for you hard and naked show emotions, with a clean look that frightens, a delight to the eye.Saraband in its most common meaning is a dance for two dancers, and the film is divided into ten chapters, preceded by a prologue and an epilogue, and all of them are conceived as a dialogue between two characters, less the prologue and the epilogue which are monologues of Liv Ullmann.No boasts formally, although he is allowed at the beginning and at the end Marianne talk to the Viewer, directs actors all masterfully, unrepeatable moments, emotions overwhelmed, revealed miseries.With what I've seen of Bergman happens to me that I love or let me indifferent, and this goes next to them that I like, next to "Person", "Wild strawberries" or "The seventh seal". |
1,777 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/77 | Robgordon | Melissa P | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Except in the script, the rest seems removed from a middling telefilm | "The 100 hits", is the name of the controversial and successful book that autobiograficamente wrote Melissa Panarello, a young Italian woman now around the age of 19. This book brought the scandal to recount the sexual life of this girl when he was only 15 and 16 years old. And is that this is not a story of sexual awakening to the "Summer of 42", is a mirror of today's society in which sex is no longer a game of adults to be a game of children, with the risks psiquicos and physicists that this could lead.This is what it tries to convey in the film version of "Melissa p.", where sex with all its variations is discovered by Melissa young, when his innocence and his naivety still are skin-deep.This Lolita of the 21st century, the Italians have been imported to the Spanish Lolita, Maria Valverde, actress who became known and won a Goya for that great Manuel Martín Cuenca movie entitled "The weakness of the Bolshevik", in which knew how to give his character needed the sweetness and shamelessness. A discovery in that film, where only had 16, Valverde has become one of the most promising actresses of our cinema. Let us hope that his face añiñado and innocent isn't one day flower and which over the years know face roles other than the provocative girl. That you can attach to adult roles.On this occasion, his role again to require children's gestures with mature attitudes. Valverde convinces in its innocence, but not so much in its contact with the adult characters. There to wait for Valverde to comply 18 so he could shoot the scenes of nudity and the truth is that they have spared in such sequences, on the other hand, to tell a story, which is not necessary, but a sexual diary with all its consequences. In addition the dubbing of the own Maria Valverde, makes him a disservice in its Spanish version.The truly interesting thing of this "Melissa p.", although nothing new on the other hand, is something that already contained the novel. This mirror, as we say, in that a large part of the earliest youth can look. Sex and its consequences in a child that still uses backpacks and just stop playing with toys. The mental disorder that may ensue in the person. To reaffirm the fragility of the girl, the film introduces two characters and one ghost around Melissa. A mother who believes that gives everything to his daughter, but that in reality hardly known, a grandmother who understands the girl, but not live at home to advise her and a non-existent parent with which Melissa, only communicate by SMS.Therefore a portrait where we see a quinceañera, without patenal or maternal, help without the basic family environment which is needed for proper socialization of a human being. A house where solitude abounds. And with regard to the scope of the Institute, good and bad influences are shown on the tape. The choice of one or other part of Melissa, her lead to an uncontrolled sex hell or the straight path that corresponds to their age.The strictly film of "Melissa p.", little we save or highlight. What interesting and previously cited, was the basis of the book, and how could it be otherwise, remains on the tape. But the rest seems removed from a telefilm of middling, as or more likely chains to the telefilm seleccionarian for your grill.An address without touch, without taste. A bad montage and a terrible use of music.Luca Guadagnino, the director of the function, is halfway between the poetic tone and tone sordido. Enter characters that forgets easily to then introduce them again on screen without prior notice. In addition some sexual sequences are shot without the slightest talent. And what is most worrying, sometimes gives the feeling that we are before an announcement of compresses.There is nothing with a minimal relevance in "Melissa P.". A story nothing scandalous, (perhaps a few years ago if it were) sometimes free, with claim of offender, an unfortunate story, almost two boring hours of footage and a terrible direction. Isn't exactly with the recommendation of the week, although there will be many who were enamored with María Valverde in "The weakness of the Bolshevik" who want to see how it goes this girl with two years more. |
1,778 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/314 | Rafa Ferrer | Domino | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Even the presence of Jacqueline Bisset and his final half-hour (spare) manages to pick up a movie that makes water after their excellent first minutes | According to progresses the plot one wondered, that seeing this, I went with "The fire of revenge" that his mount video-clipero and led to their flat strangers in my a strange headache, with "Domino" happens to me equal to half of the movie one is tired of both flat, contraplano and flicker.The tape is intended to be a mixture of tapes as "Assassins Natos" with a hyphen that sometimes picks up scraps of love a true "Romance" or "Pulp Fiction", unfortunately turns out to be a tape of action (with members of "Sense of life") where everything is just as tired and boring, maybe, the best on screen is the presence of Keira Knighley and Mickey Rourke (again from now after his excellent work in "Sin City")not even the presence of Jacqueline Bisset and his final half-hour (spare) manages to pick up a movie that makes water after their excellent first minutes.In short, a tape that should have ended with the same intensity with which begins, no wonder that it has taken "centuries" to reach theaters in our country. |
1,779 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1107 | Caruco | Banderas de nuestros padres | 4 | 5 | muchocine | It may the interpretations section be more bland than the desirable, or your pace and brilliance is irregular, especially in its final stretch, but Eastwood still very in shape. | A feat of Clint Eastwood. 76 years and even giving much war with "Flags of our fathers", an example of his wisdom, good taste and classicism directing. Providing us entertainment and cinema at the same time. As we have never seen before in his films, it combines the most intimate sequences with big action. Necessary to show the double conflict, or the two fronts open during World War II: one on the first line of combat, with thousands of young people dying; and the other in the cities themselves and people of the nation, besieged and resisting against the enemy (if, for example, France), or away from the firing of bombs and machine guns (the case of the United States.)(UU.), but with the pressing need to raise huge amounts of money that pay all war material.The film opens with the scene of a soldier only, disoriented and frightened in the middle of a desert terrain of battle, hearing the cries of relief and combat hisses.Without heroes or villains.The episode is the nightmare of one older man who still wakes up suddenly with the nightmares of the past, isolated and helpless by the trauma of such experience.The first images and dialogues are what will be the look of the film. Shortly thereafter, an ' off' voice specific this vision: "There are many morons who believe that they know what is war, especially those who have not been in one." Well clearly things like: good and bad, heroes and villains. "That there, but most of the time are not who we believe."Shows the heroism of American forces during the invasion of the island of Iwo Jima in 1944, volcanic island and strategic point. And some villains who must defeat, of course, for the sake of humanity: the Japanese. Images of guns and fuses Japanese emerging almost from scratch, from the forts and tunnels, as if they were a ghostly enemy, a threat which lurks the protagonists in a worthy of the fantasy genre scenes are splendid.But in reality there is no heroes or villains. Combatants Yankees recognize that, as much to speak of patriotism, freedom and other things, their struggle is for survival or companionship. There villains, because many are seen with a certain respect. To complete this vision soon will have "Letters from Iwo Jima", the same but from the Japanese perspective, and that of the losers.In the form.Then there is the other front, that of politicians and military waging the Mission of selling millions of war with which to finance bonds. Here intervenes all the media circus and politician extolling before public opinion to three of the six survivors who raised an American flag in the Suribachi.La mount need icons and heroes made three young idols. But also were heroes who doubted their status, who believed betray the true heroes, usurping them honors his companions dead on the battlefield. And heroes with expiration date, they would very soon be a gift no one. And not even the architects of handling and selling your image might be considered as villains. Collect many dollars every day was essential. The baggage, weapons or fuel, does not appear from nowhere.Eastwood manages to largely collect and convey the issues and proposed nuances, with an extraordinary photography, muted colors, frames of a pictorial plasticity and a production design that puts us squarely in the era and the time.Also makes us step back, and look for reflection, with a structure of the story progresses and regresses in the facts, which even does not allow us to easily identify others side, heroes and martyrs anonymous, launched into a fatuous destination, and only remembered by the sobbing of mothers.It may the interpretations section be more bland than the desirable, or your pace and brilliance is irregular, especially in its final stretch, but Eastwood is still (very) in the form. |
1,780 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4289 | Daniel Galindo | Juno | 4 | 5 | muchocine | A real character of a realistic comic, played by a successful Ellen Page in this funny and incontestable tale of initiation, consisting of remnants of an elegant, even if with mood highlight suit. | Lucid and entertaining, Juno is the 'another teen comedy', which leaves no bad place to young people, is more real - despite the overwhelming burden of snooty dialogues-, convinces with its mix of sweet and sour and spicy tone and, above all, is surprising. That nobody put the product 'indie' label, on the path of little Miss Sunshine, because that can only burden the becoming of this atypical tape. The atypical comes to delicious and rightly irreverent - something more than Ghost World, by putting it on some point - in an era in which only occasionally be grasping an oasis in the middle of a desert full of bland sand.The character of Juno and its problems - and their ability, or not, to resolve them - articulates a story seasoned with a just hint of bitterness and in the savoring some drops of brilliance. The dish, a substantial and original, incoming presents dotted by samples of a gallery of beings somewhat stereotyped although suitable to sustain the viaduct between the two worlds that transits Juno on the road ranging from immaturity logical and seized, to the land, or you are an adult. or you are an adult!Our travel companion has this attractive aura of sabionda girl, a repellent point - very seductive, by the way – to believe a much superior, although he presumed not let us believe. For that and many other reasons, Ellen Page is exultant in a credible character, much more than the of the 'lolita-caperucita' of Hard Candy, that was something forced - demands of script, of course--. We must point out that these laudable work are not comparable: Juno, the character of Page - with a sense of irony much more worked - recalls the girl it was Natalie Portman in Beautiful girls and matured to become the protagonist of Garden State (something in common).Jasón Reitman, director of the curious thank you for smoking, and Brook Busey-Hunt (alias Diablo Cody), former stripper and erotic line stuck writer, voice have been successful with this glimpse into the adventure of grow. Nobody consider Juno a work to use, but a crushing fable of intensities and roads which, although longer, are more striking and enriching than the common shortcuts. In short, is a proposal that take salt to that that life you play tricks, something which is not that we take suddenly. Now that the grace of life is live with intensity, being a little well, insolent if you leave, know you, even though few dare to put it into practice. |
1,781 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/176 | Robgordon | Psicosis | 5 | 5 | muchocine | It was without any doubt a turning point in the career of the director, a shift needed to adapt to the new cinema that was gradually being implemented | In 1960, no one expected that Hitchcock would make a movie like "Psycho". Orondo British director wore during more than 20 years at the top of the world cinema with its elegant suspense, their persecutory plots and a very personal film with a clear Basic constants in each tape ran.Just prior to that year, Hitchcock was at its stage more mature and brilliant. He had just directed masterpieces like "Rear window", "Vertigo" or "death on the heels", in which both Paramount and MGM, had provided Hitchcock high budgets in order to satisfy your requests, i.e., the presence of actors of the stature of James Stewart, Cary Grant, Grace Kelly, James Mason, Kim Novak or Eva Marie Saint, precisely favorite actors of the director, or to be able to shoot in the best locations and with the best technique.(Moon would get an overwhelming dominance of color and handling of the camera in these three works, there is more to see the high investment made Paramount for the scene of the Bell Tower of "Vertigo")For all these reasons was surprised that Hitchcock was set in a small mystery novel, written by Robert Bloch, to make it his next film. Hitchcock, also decided that "Psycho" should be in black and white, without dazzling stars, with purely television technical teams. "Drastic changes were a priori not too covered by the producer and the environment of Hitch, but subsequently were confirmed as suitable, for a history of similar characteristics.""Psycho" would have been perfectly a chapter extended series "Alfred Hitchcock presents" great success at the time, though Hitchcock saw something more in it, he saw a terrifying story that could be used to unleash a new cinematographic vision. Because "Psycho" is nothing to everything that Hitchcock had filmed. If in his entire career, English was a lover of the suggestion, here chose to show, if you like select, luxury, here chose the austere and with all this, Hitchcock managed to establish a new model of horror film, a movie would be the mother of the well-known "psycho-killer" or cinema of assassins in series, as well as a way of filming radically novel that increased anxiety or terror of the public. "It could be argued, that would not exist"Henry, portrait of a killer","The silence of the lambs"or"Boston strangler", as well as all subsequent horror film if Hitchcock had not done so"psicosis".""Psycho" told the story of a woman (Janet star) who stole a high amount of money to his own company with the intention of being able to start a new life with her boyfriend (John Gavin). In his escape, he would stop to rest in a lost Highway motel run by a mysterious mother and her son (Anthony Perkins). The arrival at the motel precipitating some macabre facts, tragic consequences for the thief.Hitchcock was right in full in each of the decisions of the film. Black and white gave an additional who venia horror movie as ring to the finger to get the lugubridad Motel and the Bates House, or the facility in order to be explicit to show blood. The choice of actors was impeccable. A semidesconocido Anthony Perkins wrote a memorable murderer, shy and with complex edípico. Janet Leigh made his debut as "Hitchcock blonde". The director was right to think that she when was the actress more famous cast, his hasty death on the tape would be that staff descolocase. On the side, Martin Balsam, John Gavin and Vera Miles were suitable for their respective roles.Once again, Hitchcock used his famous technique of the Mcguffin, giving primary importance to the robbery carried out by Marion Crane (Janet Leigh) to suddenly shift the story was really interesting, the Bates motel and its occupants.Hitchcock got the fear in his body to the staff, who believed that it was before a new persecution film by the director, and he suddenly found with an explicit murder and a surprising killer.The shower scene was the logical impact on the Viewer, that still retains fresh today, reviewing the tape. Three keys of the excellent performance of this sequence, which have established it as the sequence were most popular in the history of cinema, as the cry more famous.On the one hand, the music of strings of Bernard Herrmann, the musical standard of Hitchcock and responsible for the greatest impact of many of the works of the English teacher. Initially, the scene of the murder in the shower wouldn't have more sound than the knife and the cry of the Crane, while listening to Hitchcock that Herrmann had composed gave more than the approval to the use of this music in the scene, on the other hand is Saul Bass, creator of the titles of "Vertigo" and "death on the heels" and who designed, hand in hand with Hitchcock and plane to plane the mythical stream of the shower. Finally, George Tomasini, habitual editor of Hitch, ride the difficult sequence perfectly.Great planning the sequence to complete already would if same famous "Psycho", but there were many more findings in the tape as to be displaced by the fame of this unique scene. No less brilliant and scary is for my the murder of detective Milton Arbogast (Martin Balsam). Displaying, Hitchcock by his handling of suspense during the undue entry of the detective in the Bates House, director finished off the scene with a plane in chopped of his murder at the hands of Mrs Bates, who sincerely put the willies."As I am well your writer, Joseph Stefano,"Psychosis"is important because lacks it predictability in Hitchcock until such a time." "Psycho" was unexpected, nobody thought that a director so elegant would show us for the first time in film lavatory, a corpse, nudity in a shower and above all a very clear coldness in the protagonists in the macabre, the sexual, the forbidden. It was without any doubt a turning point in the career of the director, a necessary shift to adapt to the new cinema that was gradually being implemented. And again, Hitchcock ahead. |
1,782 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1613 | Rafa Ferrer | Big fish | 5 | 5 | muchocine | The realization of a Tim Burton able to create authentic Visual delusions, as it has done previously. Without diminishing the final result. The image of my father... | "Big Fish" reminds me much to my father, who was a great stories counter, is why, when I finished to see I was touched just like the first time I saw her, filling me with the eyes of tears at the end of the same. The film sometimes and in some way resembles the magic that conveyed us Burton in "Edward Scissorhands" actually in the trailer for the same can listen to its main theme. It means the return of Tim Burton to the fantasy world which had relegated in his lackluster "Planet of the apes". It is an ode to freedom and imagination in which the free and creative spirit is seen as an authentic vital privilege steeped in optimism. The spectator attends a real image of two-hour fairy tale with pleasure and fun. In this singular tragicomedy, Burton knows combine rightly dramatic moments with other filled with romantic, magical and surreal situations with other fondly human who manage you identify fully with what appears on the screen. Manages to convey the lack of understanding that can be between two beings however appreciating, as well as the need for that imagination permeated our lives. Added to what is the realization of a Tim Burton able to create authentic Visual delusions, as it has done previously. Without diminishing the final result. Now that you have on DVD!Run out and buy it! (not ye shall go forth disappointed) |
1,783 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3570 | Andrés Pons | Cry Wolf | 3 | 5 | muchocine | However what one expected as simple bait, he ends up encountering a well shot film where the protagonists for once have some charisma, especially the two protagonists. | Apparently one of the most sobados subgenera of the genus of the horror named SLASHER that almost works as a genre at your own pace with the same topics always but always acceptable blockbuster results achieved.A new way of approaching the terror was created from the successes in the 70 and 80 films such as "The night of Halloween" or "Friday the 13th".It was as if the action was in a residential neighborhood, school, summer camp. An unknown killer butchered to adolescents without much brain.With doses of GORE, sex, a bit of black humor, her formula is repeated reaching in many films the ridiculous.Here the action takes place in an Institute, crossing some samples of the latest hits of the genre as "Rumors that kill" or "You want to tell you a secret" with the SLASHER of always.You little comment of completely unknown actors and a director who faces his first film. However what one expected as simple bait, he ends up encountering a well shot film where the protagonists for once have some charisma, especially the two protagonists.A much better elaborate script that in this type of production are carried out, all of this with an elegant address that manages to keep you in suspense without liters of blood or topless. |
1,784 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/828 | Caruco | Borat | 2 | 5 | muchocine | In this orgy of the offense and the insult?Borat? do just for making a mess, pointing in all directions and unclear what is? open to criticism? or not. | Is matter of taste, but the type of cinema as "Borat" (with the addition on its title in Spanish: "the country of Kazakhstan second best reporter travels to America"), is at the Antipodes of which interests me. The humor thick "caca", "vaginas", "straws" and "ass"; the trompazos and blows; cause by cause, splitting the loop of bad taste, it is neither original nor attracts me. Even if, as it is the case of "Borat", it is a sociological phenomenon by its éxitazo (surprise) at the box office nortemaricana (one more example of the "terrible" impact of Bush's policy, make a film like this a taquillazo).And not attracts me even though he defends with the alibi evidence to the difficulties of the fraternization between cultures or be a reflection (which it is, as faithful as pathetic) "more civilised" society today. Do have in fact, Kazakhstan, in Central Asia, is used as a distorting mirror of the worst of the culture, society and belief? Yankees? and? in the Western world.Jokes that spreads like poisoned darts Sacha Baron Cohen, aka "Ali G", alias "Borat", a raised to the maximum power, both seems to not escape nor handicapped physical, mentally deficient, collective gay, feminist, senators, preachers, black, wealthy people, ordinary people in the street, bienpensantes, malpensantes, citizens of the deep America, of the city of New York or Jews.Irony according to?Borat?It is understood that in many cases Borat sceptical about prejudices very, dangerously, rooted. Thus, the excuse for his documentary in the U.S. is taking ideas to modernise and find solutions to the "major problems" of Kazakhstan, who are, literally: "economic, social and Jews".Do one more (allegedly) funny sequences shows us this macho reporter, retrógada, vain and anti-Semite housed in a home of? horror! Jews. The sequence is treated as if it were of a horror film, with nod included one of the most remembered scenes of "The Blair Witch Project".But do not put the cry in the sky. I have blown the British Sacha Baron Cohen is Jewish, and also convinced and practitioner. So he will know better than anyone what the feeling many times, being Jewish to others.However, in this orgy of the offense and insult, "Borat" just becoming a mess, pointing in all directions and unclear what is "open to criticism" or not. What is not its intention to separate one of the other, and that everyone decides? Do do that, that is not understood or the same Borat Sagdiyev.Genial Borat, regrettable Borat.Para therefore more confuse the viewer travels to a format of? road movie? in plan "mockumentary" with deliberate aesthetic feista (and entails no default, on the contrary, the form fits the content), and where it is supposed that there is a bit of everything. People who know that type of film are intervening, others that smell it and others that catches them completely by surprise.Mixing between them, Borat makes his tour, rather than to get "ideas" to modernize his country, to meet their own and selfish sexual desires, and basically expressed in meats and forms of Pamela Anderson.El home in Kazakhstan is great. Do also hilarious the? gag? at the hotel, where this Kazakh journalist confuses the elevator to your room, and refuses to leave because the space already feels fucking great and think that your room will be smaller.But the half an hour was wishing that Borat was quiet, and in projection waiting and hoping that the peliculilla ended, for heavy, crude and unconscionable. Do do even a sequence as "Anthology" as "grotesque" fighting to the? agree?, with Borat and orondo producer naked in free competition of wrestling caused by the audacity of the second to masturbate to a picture of his beloved Pamela Anderson, served to brighten me function. Nor the fact that the sequence has one of the most hilarious and clever of the film details the place an elongated black spot decrying the penis (supposedly long) of the protagonist.Borat at the Museum.And while instead of surrender and enjoy this feast of laughter, one asked things like: why Borat not listening to their partners after ask them? Why he meddles in any site and insulting everyone? Why is does constantly fool if you know very well what their intentions? Of course! It will be because speaks of incommunicado detention and the need to cause as a means of transgression.Art, of course, is transgression. It must also have a sense of humor and know take things to banter. But "Borat" is like planting a cagarro in half of the Guggenheim Museum. Each shock, others laugh, others numberless his daring, others would break kicked if they could. It would also be the option to take it with indifference.But I do not remember any "shit"-shaped this, "shit", that has done nothing for art or culture. In the same way that few times a film with humor (who not comedy) Intelligent has triumphed at the box office American. Bueno! At least now a lot of people, myself included, will know that there is also Kazakhstan. |
1,785 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1093 | Puspus | El perfume | 4 | 5 | muchocine | The true joy of the film lies in enjoying the Tykwer estilazo behind the camera. Do do these finest plans, this superb recreation of the time, these images that almost up? smell?... | Years ago I knew nothing about one of my directors fetish, German Tom Tykwer. For too long this gentleman, responsible of "Run, Lola, run" and the fascinating "the Princess and the Warrior", presented his films at various European festivals without any national distributor dared to a acquire their rights and release them in Spain. They should be too busy funding masterpieces such as "Since that dawns fancy" or "GAL". The case is that this drought is over (and I predict that you forever) with "El Perfume", brilliant adaptation of the best-seller of Patrick Süskind and definitive consecration of Tykwer as "European reference author". "The Perfume" tells the fascinating story of Jean Baptiste Grenouille, a man of exceptional smell and obsessive goals in the middle of the 18th century France. How were its squalid origins and how, thanks to his nose, he was escaping progressively, while never being a dangerous misfit, a poignant mutant to the eternal quest for affection. Unknown Ben Whishaw embodies this character with unnerving conviction. The entire film is based on his narrow shoulders and uncle supports the weight without the least hint of exhaustion. Almost the same as the great Dustin Hoffman, which endorses the perfumer Baldini and dispatched the order with a naturalness that acompleja. However, for me, the true joy of the film lies in enjoying the Tykwer estilazo behind the camera. These finest plans, this superb recreation of the time, these images that almost to "smell". To me this guy I love. What can I do. By that even forgive him that controversial end, much derided by all, where some levels fall unambiguously into the most absolute of the ridiculous. The film is a sad and beautiful tale. A story about loneliness, rejection, and unrequited love. A tale that must end as such. I understand it as well. Although it is true its farcical tone disconnect of the seriousness of the whole. |
1,786 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1359 | Yojimbo | Batalla en el cielo | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Compared to his previous work can be more accessible, more simple and less complex and complete. It is a different film. And what of different beat it pulse. | I had the opportunity to meet the director thanks to a work that we carry out in his time for his first feature film, Japan, a tough history performed by non-professional actors and that principle could prove very difficult screening by its aesthetics and rhythm.Shot on Super16mm with Scope (very well used and photographed) format, the film can be described as rare experience. Although it would understand that many viewers take them back this kind of film I have to confess that I saw with interest.He won the Golden camera at Cannes 2002, award which relaunched his career and succeeded in this film which premiered on October 14 in few rooms (only in Alphaville and Verdi) has had the opportunity to compete in this festival and presented at San Sebastian. the history of this film distributed by the always "indie" Golem is not easily summarized. He could tell that it is on a chauffeur (Marcos Hernández) and a morbid love affair with the daughter of his "master", a wealthy and beautiful young (Anapola Mushkadiz) dedicated to prostitution by taste. Marcos and his wife have kidnapped the baby from her family for a ransom, but the baby dies, something causing a deep sense of guilt to confess though can't you in frameworks. And everything leads to a tragic end.In few lines could thus gutting the film.But we must see it. I repeat that my I was mesmerizing. There are flat long, almost endless, but they do not tire.Sometimes seems to embrace the documentary style but without being so. Do sometimes tempts our patience and good taste with a couple of scenes of real fellatio (some of them surplus to not negatively predispose the Viewer)? but it is unclassifiable. And you can love or hate it. I prefer to stay in a term half and give a 7 because it is a film that comes out totally of schemes and is not be a crappy or an experiment of video art insufferable.Compared to his previous work can be more accessible, more simple and less complex and complete, but still continues to be a work needing view because I do not believe that there are history or prejudices in 99% of the viewers towards this kind of movies. It is a different film. And what of different beat it pulse. |
1,787 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/343 | Hombre Lobo | Superman returns | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Write a more than correct page in the history of film of the character, although still without showing us that work teacher that we deserve. | Everyone likes Superman. You that lee also likes. And if not, you should. If someone does not like Superman, it is because simply wrong fall you superheroes, and before that already cannot be nothing. The man of steel is, without doubt, the archetypal heroic par excellence, the equivalent to Hercules in our time. It was created by two Jewish youth in the 1930s, but now it belongs to everyone. During the cold war was used as a means of propaganda (adding to its phrase "for truth and justice" the climax "and our way of life") but all of that is already happily behind. Superman symbolises the most noble qualities which is able to mankind, only contained therein are in its purest form. It is the highest symbol of the righteous will fall from the sky. In other words, Superman summarizes the great messianic desire of Western culture.Perhaps that is the reason why there has been no film adaptation which has left everyone satisfied. Because come on, put you hand on the heart and tell me that some of the previous Superman films is really good. The first, 78, was a masterful soundtrack, was starring a huge Christopher Reeve and showed a really great part in which the origin of the superhero were all luxury of details, but from there everything is descalabraba: the scene in which Superman returning in time was ridiculous even for the era, and the man of steel didn't have a rival who was at its height. The second had some interesting villains, but in the end, the way in which they were defeated was so pathetic that did you cry of impotence. To make matters worse, the two films were with Lex Luthor in my opinion nefarious: a Gene Hackman who was more a comic character than a genuine threat. The third and fourth, while less talk better.Two decades it took to realize the project of a new Superman film, and the charge was Brian Synger, who had already proved to know the world of superheroes with their two X-Men movies, especially with the second. Partly following the "example" given by Christopher Nolan with his Batman Begins (2005), exceeding by far the versions of Tim Burton, Synger decides to reinvent his version of Superman, doing a sequel to the second part of his and pretending that the third and fourth were nightmares that never occurred. What was already a first success, one of the many Superman Returns (2006) offers.Because if there is something I admit is that Superman Returns has bad moments. However, the good parts are very good.The Messianic content mentioned above are here everything less "content". Synger does not seem make every effort to show us Superman (played here, rightly, by an actor almost unknown to the general public) as a sort of demigod called by order "divine" to save humanity no matter what mess is goal, also showing an interesting in modern man dichotomy: the supplicant need to be saved at the same time manifested openly otherwise. This is, without doubt, the most interesting aspect (for me) of the film.However, not everything is good. Unfortunately, Superman Returns is still showing a Lex Luthor worthwhile. Kevin Spacey resembles more to the idea that we all have character, but as Gene Hackman, is a clown. A cruel clown and despot, but to the end and Cape pasayo. This, confess it, I do not like at all, especially after that the TV had already offered us two excellent versions of the character: of the new animated series and one that gives life Michael Rosebaum in Smalville (take here to vindication this fabulous series). So I can not say that they had no easy to give this character depth it deserves. In addition, when we take into account that in the current version of the comic, Luthor is President of the United States, the choice of an "apolitical" character seems rather cowardly.Another problem in this regard is Kevin Spacey, a totally inappropriate actor. Spacey is simply too effeminate to be Lex Luthor, and this is very noticeable in the scenes in which angry. To make matters worse, we should not forget that he appeared in a cameo as "Dr. Evil" in Austin Powers 3 (2002), that of entry it is impossible to take seriously.So, ultimately, Superman Returns writes a more than correct page in the history of film of the character, although still without showing us that work teacher that we deserve. However, is still recommended by his grand scenes of action and lavish of his emotional manipulation (especially everytime sounds John Williams fanfare).There are already several that have fallen you over to this film, in a way which is, in my view, exaggerated. I imagine that it will be the time that do qualify this unjust refusal, and that Superman Returns is, along with The Hulk (2003), one of the films based on comics more misunderstood of this decade. It will be impossible to satisfy all fans of the character, but at least this film may be the first step towards a definitive interpretation of the myth. Hopefully. |
1,788 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2769 | Tito Chinchan | El caso Bourne | 3 | 5 | muchocine | First installment of the Bourne saga, a secret agent who fights to regain his memory and leave you in peace. A fair level of action and an appropriate intrigue make two hours too long. | Taking advantage of the premiere of the third part of the saga, I bring you a "remember" of the previous two. So you can see that I am a guy nice and rolled. That views once again, I realized that already seen had. UM, that isn't anything good for a movie, if it goes through your retina and brain assimilates nothing thereon.The film is about a boat of fishermen found on the high seas to a sea bream with aspect of human being. After rescuing him from the water and seeing it has a couple of bullets in the back, the boy stands, with a strong amnesia, but with knowledge in languages, and other martial arts. To arrive at port, the boy goes to a bank whose review took her into the hip and there discovers that he has thousands of dollars and hundreds of passports with different names. But nothing to tell you who he is.Since then, this first installment brings us the hand as it increases the intrigue to know who is our Bourne. Pity that the film ends and leave no doubt, but well, does not pass anything. The film has enough action, not all that deseariamos, but an acceptable level. The plot is quite well, which makes a film of these that we must see before you die popcorn fans, clear.In short, first installment of the Bourne saga, with a secret agent who fights to regain his memory, and that leave you in peace. A fair level of action and an appropriate intrigue make two hours too long.kisses. |
1,789 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/638 | Rafa Ferrer | Tu, yo y ahora...Dupree | 2 | 5 | muchocine | It comedy more than disposable, of those that husbands consort we endure in the film, and women are happy to contemplate what happens on screen. | Tells the story of a couple newly married Carl and Molly Peterson (Dillon and Hudson), that decide to accommodate the best friend of this, Randy Dupree (Wilson), the godfather of the wedding, who has just lost his job and his house in his new home. Stay for a few days, however, soon becomes permanent because neither of them knows how to tell is enough.Do some years ago (and sorry that I put into plan grandfather green onion), G men sang that of "Can't stand your cousin", because they get that song, estirenla nauseam, placed instead of the heavy premium of David Summers, Owen Wilson with his face of bobo and already have the simple film shot with 3? and pretending (as have) razing on-screen, there they have one comedy and throw-away, of those that husbands consort we endure in the film, and women are happy to watch what happens on screen, and try to transmute it to his real life.How much are going to laugh my friends from muchocine when they know that in this, again, I had to pass by the box office box. |
1,790 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4153 | Ana Belén Pacheco | Sweeney Todd | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Tim Burton chooses everything with perfect care, so even the minor role is brilliant. It close to perfection. | There are few filmmakers who wake up so many passions among his followers as Tim Burton does yours get put the willies. He said. And that happens when up to a trailerTim Burton on the wheel press that the film can be for children "But rare children" and is to get once more create that magical atmosphere of tale that transgresses any narrative discourse that can develop on the screen. Benjamin Barker is a Barber who has been unjustly accused by Judge Turpin to steal women. While in prison the evil judge takes care of his daughter and keeps it locked up under lock and key. After leaving prison, Benjamin returns to London to plan his revenge. There he learns of the fate suffered by the two women in his life and plans to a macabre justice under his new pen name: Sweeney Todd. With him, the only person who knows his secret is a young Baker who will benefit from the skills with the knife of the Barber while trying to conquer it.Johnny Depp is essential for Burton in almost all tapes. It is true that he has collaborated with him on six occasions and that the outcome is usually quite bright and this case is no exception. It is not only able to act if not who sings it and does it very well. Something more modest but equally effective is the wife of filmmaker: Helena Bonham Carter (that equal that her husband does not know what is a brush) and is a fantastic surprise to discover the vocal talents of Alan Rickman or even Sacha Baron Cohen's (Ali G and Borat to the desubicados) which I admit that in his role of Pirelli has boot me more than one laugh thanks to his Italian accent despite the fact that I don't like at all as much less as a comedian and actor. Tim Burton chooses everything with perfect care, so even the minor role is brilliant (example in the child, magnificent voice and better actor than most of the players that populate the Billboard).Starting with the opening credits (great start) until the end of Burton recreates that grey and soulless aspect of the city of London but does something appealing and fun. Da essence red, a brilliant and bright red that contrasts with all the grim tone that permeates the footage, an almost theatrical red.His peculiar world is part of the protagonists of Sweeney Todd, the Victorian London is undoubtedly one of the most brilliant and gloomiest Burton creations to date and an ideal background for a brilliant film that deserves a place on the podium of honour of the Filmography of the filmmaker.It close to perfection. Notice. Sweeney Todd respects its original version, i.e. is a musical. Not is fooled by the first trailer as the majority of the work is sung and therefore stays in subtitled original version. |
1,791 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4078 | Dragon negro | La criatura perfecta | 3 | 5 | muchocine | An interesting proposal that despite to have offered more, stays in a film is especially recommended for lovers of the genre as a curiosity. | Glenn Standring brings us his second film, from the first, one unknown the Irrefutable truth about the demon, six years have passed, clear that we must also take into account that which we are discussing dates back to 2006 and are already entered in 2008. This is a co-production between United Kingdom and New Zealand and counts with the presence of the known Saffron Burrows giving something more than output to this moderate budget film.We are in an alternate world where vampires live in harmony with humans. 300 Years ago, an alchemist who was studying genetics believe this superior race, as well as a myriad of pests and diseases, after which the use of genetics was banned worldwide. This new race was aposentando and creating to your around a sort of religion and acting as if they were priests. They are feared and idolized equally among human beings in the current era is situated where the history, that would be a beginning of XX century with retro-futuristas touches. These 300 years never before a vampire had taken a human life, even if their livelihood is the blood, this is donated by the faithful followers of the religion. But now one of them is killing people, and will be the appointed his own brother to catch him, it will also have the help of the police. Dark secrets that keeps the brotherhood of vampires inside Iran uncovering during the investigation.We must assume that we are dealing with a product away from the Hollywood machinery and that it has a moderate budget with which his mise en scène although effective, is really poor. Anyway, is this one of its best assets as well as an initial approach that promises quite and proposes a new situation in the relationship between man and vampires of which we are accustomed to seeing. But against we have a development of rather poor history and severely limited that accuses excessive lack of pretensions and personality, also next joined the little claw that put the actors in their respective roles. The good idea will deflate slowly without knowing seize it or take full advantage of it.Anyway nor what it would consider a crappy or anything, but an interesting proposal despite to have offered more, stays in a film is especially recommended for lovers of the genre as a curiosity and in general as a counterpoint to the films fantastic American and that no mistake, are neither nor by far much more recommended that is before us. |
1,792 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1849 | Tito Chinchan | Anacondas: la cacería por la orquidea sangrienta | 2 | 5 | muchocine | The movie is well to sit with your popcorn on a rainy Sunday and not lift me more than to piss (or for more popcorn). Personally the movie I liked, although we must recognize that it is a little fart. | That can be expected of a film which includes a bug that Dan fright, the word hunt and the bloody word in its name? For that, one movie of bichas (as they say in the South) fat, that make a bloody Hunt (that joke more bad) with a bunch of greedy to be richer than the Kasogui (as written).It is that the serpientazas are living in an area of the jungle where it grows a bloody Orchid (rather red and goes it kicks). And some pharmaceutical laboratories, who do not know the existence of the anacondas, discovered that these orchids are sorted to make you immortal. I do not understand well because you want to fuck the business of curing people creating a drug that makes you immortal, but it does.Total, that is mounted the typical expedition, with good aunts, the mindless, the black funny, the Tosk handles that dazzles the solid, that you see the second scene that will die eaten by all the snakes in the world and a pair of armadillos and the simple bait. They arrive in the Amazon and weapon of God is Christ. If the handles loaded a crocodile with the hands, if it bites me a spider, that if that seemed silly is the more bastard and want to get rich, that snakes have more hunger than me at 3 in the morning, etc.In the end, it passes what we already know all, so I do not. The movie is well to sit with your popcorn on a rainy Sunday and not lift me more than to piss (or for more popcorn). Personally the movie I liked, although we must recognize that it is a little fart. But all my movies of bugs me are cool, heh, heh. |
1,793 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1205 | Rafa Ferrer | Camino a Guantánamo | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Cruel and quite raw. After an hour and a half of footage, when you get to the end you breathe, accompanied by a feeling of pain, guilt and hope that what you've seen on screen is there and does not happen again. | Interesting pseudo-documentary directed by Michael Winterbottom, after the excellent "code 46" and the mediocre porn pseudo-película "9 songs" delves deeply into the situation of Islamic prisoners at the American base in guantanamo.The film or documentary (don't know very well call it), it is hard, cruel and quite raw, and finally after hour and a half of footage, when you get to the end you breathe, accompanied by a feeling of pain, guilt and hope that what you've seen on screen is there and does not happen again.It has struck me, something already I saw on the page of film "The lost hours" and that they also commented, the protagonists following the unfortunate incident did not feel bad, it goes backwards, felt that this experience had helped in their lives; I would not put me on your skin, but I think that if he saw me in that position, I do not know if I would feel like them, probably would not like to see an American flag in my bloody life.Anyway, like the tape which I got yesterday my opinion / criticism, a film which is worth seeing, although during that hour and a half suffer nearly as those who are on screen. |
1,794 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3671 | Oscar Martínez | El bosque del luto | 4 | 5 | muchocine | The mourning forest is a beautiful movie, with some excellent performances and a beautiful photograph that, despite its extreme slowness, make it a true display of feelings and emotions almost visceral. | Awarded the Grand Prize of the Festival in Cannes and nominated for the Palme d'Or, the mourning forest has been directed by Naomi Kawase and played by Shigeki Uda Machiko Ono, Makiko Watanabe, Kanako Masuda and Yoichiro Saito.Mogari no mori tells us the story of Shigeki, an old man who lives in a secluded residence. There it feels comfortable and happy with other residents and staff that attends them. Machiko, a social worker that belongs to such equipment, gives special attention, although inside he torments the loss of a child. To celebrate the birthday of Shigeki, Machiko decides to take him for a ride by car by the field. But the car is stopped by the wayside. The elder domestic decisively in the forest, and Machiko has no choice but to accompany him.We could define the forest of mourning with two qualifiers, no doubt, making it totally justice: wonderful and agonizingly slow.Usually documentary Naomi Kawase tells a tender story of acceptance and hope through a makeshift initiatory journey that leads to two people, Machiko and Shigeki, to overcome their own ghosts and accept the death of their loved ones.Depressingly slow pace despite its 97 minutes of footage, always with camera in hand and virtually no dialogue, one should take the viewing of the forest of mourning with philosophy, if you don't want to arrive to exasperate is. Once accepted his apparent monotony, before the viewer opens a truly unforgettable experience, with a strong sentimental burden and a few performances whose symbolism may not be qualified otherwise than as simply brilliant and sweeping.Director Naomi Kawase brings us two seemingly opposing characters but that in the depths of his being, share the same ballasts: Machiko, an introverted young man who is unable to overcome the death of his son, and Shigeki, a cheerful old man obsessed with his deceased wife Mako. Both are linked to a past whose tortuous memory and guilt prevents them from move forward with their lives, facing in different ways. Thus, the young Machiko simply seems to ignore the memories, although can not see his own son in the figure of Shigeki, whose trauma has made him return to a sort of childlike state.This relationship shows us through a daily relationship, without plot twists or apparent melodramatic resources and whose depth lies precisely in its simplicity. Thus, such seemingly vulgar scenes such as the couple protagonist playing hide and seek, or eating watermelon, or the poignant image of Shigeki screaming desperate for the elderly that do not cross the River, seeing in him his own son, certainly remain engraved in the memory of a server for a long time. Overcoming fears and acceptance of death, both own and others, are the principalmensaje of the film, which cannot fail to remind me, especially substance to this wonder of Kim Ki-duk called spring, summer, autumn, winter. and spring.Thus, the mourning forest is a beautiful movie, with some excellent performances and a beautiful photograph that, despite its extreme slowness, make it a true display of feelings and emotions almost visceral.It is Yes, tons of patience.I give a 7'5 out of 10. |
1,795 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/866 | Pablo López | King Kong | 4 | 5 | muchocine | A love of the old story of the beautiful, that without saying anything, it says it all | Having seen the primordial version of 1933 as barely a couple of days ago, was to be expected that it happened to me all the footage (which is a lot) making comparisons, and I must say that while the 1933 version worked perfectly with its 100 minutes, this version works equally well with their monstrous 180 minutes, coming to develop parts of the plot that I missed in the first film.One of these parts is the wonderful story of love that arises between the beautiful Naomi Watts and the beast Kong, a love of the old story of the beautiful, that without saying anything, it says it all, and has been this aspect of the film that truly me has fallen in love (forgive the redundancy). Two moments to remember: the sunrises, and ice skating.With regard to the special effects it must be said that Mr. Jackson exceeded slightly, especially in the beginning of the movie when he introduces us the context of New York in the 1930s and where the computer used for things that actually have because done digitally, but is something for the not very smart pass unnoticedon the other hand the dinosarios and other infectos bichejos that populate Skull Island (island of the skull) are very achieved, but the jewel in the Crown is the giant monkey Kong, which especially in the close-ups shows us perfect, spotless, with all the details, and reaching a degree of quite surprising reality.Together with some pretty decent performances, good music and a pace quite fluid, make this work, the palomitera film par excellence of the Christmas season. |
1,796 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/621 | Ibán Manzano | Hijos de los hombres | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Odyssey narrated without flashes, overwhelming and scary, uncertain while almost impossible. | Year 2027, women can not have children. With this proposition, terrifying and pessimistic at the same time, children of men connects with the science fiction more dystopian. However, the last film for Cuarón not interested so much how has arrived at the revelation, but the parallel and alternative path that emerges in front of him. Which undertakes last pregnant women toward the hope this Odyssey narrated without flashes, between overwhelming and scary, uncertain pace that almost impossible, the protagonists move groping for the chaos and rubble, by frames that seem more realistic than usual in the genre, and therefore closer; without literature. Thus the Chronicle is transformed into science fiction, and this in turn becomes horror film. Children of men is a parable for the future without too much makeup, who dislocated a couple of decades the diseases of our days, now already terminals. The date is in fact almost contextual, circumstantial a necessary toll of the setting. Probably what I write this, we have already reached the film, or she has caught us.But as this is a story of hope, Clive Owen struggles, in the midst of the widespread blackout to light of dreams and illusions to an infertile world. So in the meantime cry and noise, don't ever hear presuroso crying of a newborn in search of love. |
1,797 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4099 | Tito Chinchan | Beowulf | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Animated film about a hero named Beowulf fighting monsters in pelotas. He had too much advertising as to be entirely neutral with her, so we tell you that it can be seen, although this did not lack both deployment. | Director: Robert Zemeckis. duration: according to the Ministry 115 minutes, but the hour and three-quarters ignited the cinema lights and everyone stands. That each draw their own conclusions.Release date: 23 November 2007.En times. BeO wulfs. With this remnant of fine humor on a server I want to say that I have reached the not inconsiderable figure of 400 reviews. If I get to know I do not see this film, but we will not walk with squeamishness. How time passes, when I started I was a poor boy from people arriving with his bunch of carrots and cabbage under the arm to the city, and now I have become what I am. I have eaten carrots and cabbage, and little else. Muahahahaha, Tito Chinchan you left for a while. Take you so as you want.The film is about a King who has a little problem that is he is eating the Warriors once mounted one mijica noise (Note mental - recruit the monster to end my neighbors - end of mental note). One day he is enough and requested, via Bard, a hero who aniquile the monster in exchange for half of their wealth. There is Beowulf, which has more eggs than Mr Pascual (mental note - the owner of the largest company of eggs - end of mental note). And there they lían espadazos and brabuconadas, which I do not more not counting everything.What stands out in the film is dubbing, in my humble understanding. I.e. you spend throughout the film thinking that Beowulf will shout "this is Sparta!", or that the partner will say "damn orejaspuntiagudas, that worth for one". By the way, why communicates with cries this Beowulf? What little education and moderation. I have not told you that you it's an animated film, with some made characters and other less (in particular the Princess). The story is not great thing, and the worst thing that has that you finish do not understand what you want to count. Especially that you expect a more linear story and the end I tad leave open-mouthed (for the worse). It can be seen, but has very weak moments, and certainly not what you expect from a film of this type.In short, film animation about a hero named Beowulf fighting in balls against monsters and similarly against the young girls. He had too much advertising as to be entirely neutral with her, so we tell you that it can be seen, although this did not lack both deployment.Besitos.P.D: There is another film, name similar, recorded rather format telefilm that I was not able to see full (sofa + loose movie + the siesta hour = baba on sofa + face textured sofa + jump area temporary for 3 hours).Pd2: The digital Jolines Angelina is to make you an analog wreck. Lol, think that nothing could be worse than the first joke. |
1,798 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3096 | Francisco Bellón | Siete Mesas de Billar Francés | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Seven French billiard tables worth by the excellent interpretative duel that occurs between Maribel Verdú and Blanca Portillo. | Get to the charts seven tables of French billiards, one of the pitted in the past Film Festival of San Sebastian. In the donostiarra pageant won the awards for best screenplay and best actress for Blanca Portillo. Who knows, maybe these awards are indicators of recovery of the Spanish cinema in 2007, recovery which began with the fabulous Mataharis.No is the first time that Gracia Querejeta receives significant Awards, as his previous work, the overrated Hector, was declared as the best film of the year by the Círculo de Escritores Cinematográficos. And what things are, nor were they agreed she in the Goya. Seven French billiard tables tells the story of Angela (Maribel Verdú) and Charo (Blanca Portillo), two women who have not had luck in life. United by the pain, both decide to stand up to adversity and move forward. Gracia Querejeta signed a film that speaks of feelings, of personal relationships, ultimately of the people. The problem is it makes it through a story did not finish work, despite convey a great realism and proximity. Some of the characters and the secondary plots are not as successful, as the relationship between the characters of Raúl Arévalo and Lorraine Vindel. The tape also to spare you some minutes, although the pace of Querejeta is needing the story you want to tell.Despite its flaws, seven French billiard tables worth by the excellent interpretative duel that occurs between Maribel Verdú and Blanca Portillo. They are the best of a film full of good intentions but fails to materialize fully. |
1,799 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1596 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | The host | 2 | 5 | muchocine | New reading of the film monsters. Much less good than some vocinglan and acceptable in their mediocrity as adult film. Entertainment has in spades when the creature to the puñeta with their baboserías. Outside there, little meat that cut, none to sell. | I'm afraid disagree, for once, with the militant movie fan orthodoxy that ensures the excellence of a film when I only look at more of the same, but in this case (and that is relevant) with that attributable to Korean culture cultural decontamination. I'm afraid disagree because I have not seen much pessimistic criticism and there are more praise than dissent. To The Host attributed excessive virtues when he possesses (is true) only some.Japanese inheritance of post-nuclear monster has powerfully crystallized in the idiosyncrasies of a country of huge Western adhesions, which has a cultural reference next in Hollywood and cela undeniable own identity heritage. In this context, Bong Joon-ho perpetrating the masterstroke of the Millennium Startup: a monster film alien yankee merchandising with enough charms national to enrapture all Korean eager to iconic spree and with much influence Hollywood, of course.Korea of the South is not a shielded territory: it is porous, permeable. This factory of scares scares not in excess: the monster is well explained, is well designed and is surprisingly well dosed, although it appears much more than the aliens and sharks that have nourished the film - with - recent creature. By this or more that are desgranará lines more down, The host are not excited. Do you like? Because no dislike, that is already enough. The family resource is well focused, but poorly written. Do not understand Korean humor or the pseudodramático mass of crocodile tears which the dedicated characters release so that we understand that they are very aggrieved at the loss of the youngest of the family, which is to be the emotional axis on which scales all footage (cumbersome).Containing portentous scenes such as the first time we see the monster on the banks of the River have Seoul, The host then falters by the weight of its own machinery of fiction. Gives equal has trouts positions with regard to chemical weapons or that one understands that the director wanted to sneak us a subtle speech about the dangers of the dictatorships of the welfare state. That is all very well, but the building collapses when we realize that twenty minutes of very good boot have already staged everything you wanted to see. The rest is a silly jokes and abuse tours technologically achieved by the sewage of the city.Political speculation comes alive with sharpness. The monster is the excuse to acogotar the neck of the citizen. It often happens. The protagonist family (excusad to not give names) is portrayed with a verismo Italian style, perhaps detailing too rigorously its reasoning and its psyche. It is not a film of Bergman or Sirk. Its ready director so requires. The host may indicate a jaded American cultural colonialism country moral temperature: physicians are American, the culprit of all the barbarism is American and decisive methods are Americans, i.e. excessive, cinematic, turgid, hollow, baldíso, in the last and obvious instance."kaiju" or Asian cinema to the Godzilla and company owes The host a greening of unpredictable dimensions. If so far West was called to steal scripts of ghosts and amazed, we now have a blockbusteriano Philo, a vein of gold unpublished. I fear the worst. We didn't have enough with the Americans and now we have slanted eyes creatures for trampling on the billboards.Another notable inconvenience is the mixture between horror and comedy film. There are moments in which you do not know if he attends a parody to the Scary movie or the original. The family epic is deslabazada, fraying. Those moments of domestic privacy sins of naïve, arroba one not requested bis comic that makes the whole dash. On the other hand, the scenes with monsters offset this decline of tension. We have criticized many times film supported in the presence of a creature (predator, Alien, jaws, Jurassic Affairs or Mimic) evident shortcomings outstanding one: characters without substance, near argument in the invisible. Therefore now is one that backtrack. What wrong with The host is precisely this: the family thing, the strictly emotional plane. What going you to do.There are changes of registry innecesariso, abrupt. There are dedicated players that not can rank in good or bad because the script are given does not offer sufficient attractiveness as its work esplenda and excited. The question is, after all, fundamental: does lack emotion in a movie of bugs?Not the idea that the film is not bad you must detach from this review. It is not, at all. What is not and must not find three feet to the mutant bugs is an outstanding film or relevant or as one wants to say. It is not new SAP to the fantastique. Nor is there a before and an after in the film monsters. Three minutes from the Nostromo in Alien fill more than twenty of this by the sewerage of Seoul. No despiste thrills avid reader. The scenes that open the film (the Monster's attack on the banks of the river) are absolutely recommended. Is it worth paying for ten minutes? |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.