Unnamed: 0 int64 0 3.88k | id stringlengths 44 47 | autor stringclasses 181 values | title stringlengths 2 71 | rank int64 1 5 | maxRank int64 5 5 | source stringclasses 1 value | summary stringlengths 9 396 | body stringlengths 352 24.4k ⌀ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,800 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/305 | Calaf | Superman returns | 4 | 5 | muchocine | By romanticism, so rhythmic pause (and feature) and a vulnerable Superman, not you like a lot of people, even though it was not my case. | Tonight I've seen return to the screens of the classic among the classics. And I can say emphatically that I liked, I enjoyed and that this continued (which not version) is higher than the first for many reasons that I am telling you if you want to.The synopsis I do not because it is better to leave to bring, and to discover the chicha of history, which is not to be much. The prism of my childhood distorted for good memories of the Superman of the 1980s. It was enough to see her major to check as film was pretty bad, but saw a revolution in its time.Superman Returns has to go from below by being a sequel, and not original, a film saturated films of comics, Workbench to only the special effects. Moreover, the only thing that usually me draw the attention of them is how superheroes gain the powers, and in this there is no such a possibility. Even so, from the very beginning there are details that Bryan Singer (director of Habituales suspects and the 2 former X-men, as well as House producer) is with respect to the public, telling things with simple gestures (the dog in the bed of the ricachona or the mysterious silence of the child). We would appreciate that not you give everything mascadito it. It has fair action scenes (that of the aircraft, spectacular). The weight it are the characters with some very successful additions, such as the child or the secondary girlfriend the wrong. And I liked Brandon Routh as Superman, although Christopher Reeve left an indelible mark. Which Yes that improvement is it, Kate Bosworth (hated the character of the original) in a risky role, the triangle Centre. The two look very handsome. I don't like however the partner of her, a pringao, however much you want to. Kevin Spacey as Lex Luthor meets.Not everything are successes. The rescue of Superman sequences are not good (with so much misfortune, saves money in a Bank, and elsewhere, except the aircraft, have not been very creative). I have read that it lacks sense of humor, but I prefer when they tend to spoil rather than contribute.There will be some that you do a little slow and long, and the end to leave open the continuations, I do not like, but get moments of emotion (such as the romantic flight) with a beautiful aesthetic.The express messianic touch with religious analogies of Superman as Savior and positions reminiscent of Jesus Christ is debatable. By romanticism, so rhythmic pause (and feature) and a vulnerable Superman, not you like a lot of people, even though it was not my case. |
1,801 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/854 | Matías Cobo | Casino Royale | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The tape plays a notable role as prequel and paves the way to coming deliveries starring Craig. | All successful formula needs to evolve to not stagnate in a monotonous repetition. The Bond películas-franquicia, evolution usually come hand in hand with a new actor takes over from another in the incarnation of the British agent. There are so many developments in the style of the film, their characters or in its history that the relevance of these is similar or greater in this Casino Royale the annotated, and controversy, the list of agents Bond Daniel Craig joining. Since the beginning of the movie when Bond WINS their double agent zero gallons killing implacablamente to the two objectives required for the position, a clear intention to land is perceived of by means with recent work starring Brosnan, more closely related with the usual style of the series of tapes based on the famous spy of Ian Fleming.La elegancesumptuous luxury and beautiful women are still there, but Bond, which is at the beginning of his career as 007, is more visceral, less sophisticated and, above all, more human. Violence is more explicit and Bond spends real trouble in action sequences that old solventaba without disheveled. For example, memorable is the initial persecution this Herculean Bond makes an offender by the streets of Madagascar at the beginning of the film, with a pace and a visual montage dazzling. Enemies, always key in this tape, have more mundane goals and no delusions of global destruction of their predecessors. Nor is repeated the ritual visit to deadly gadgets expert and women do not appear so profusely in other exhibition 007 testironil tapes. In fact, and despite this most hard Bond profile, this will show more vulnerable before the beautiful Vesper Lynd (a gorgeous Eva Green). With her live a love affair very different, and larger vessels to the shared with other 'Bond girls'.Therefore, if producers wanted to distance himself from previous tapes, have done well. Another great success is having placed the story of the film in the early career of Bond as Agent 007. Thus, the tape plays a notable role as prequel and paves the way to coming deliveries starring Craig (something already scheduled). The extensive length of the film (two and a half hours) and the true imbalance in the pace conducive to sequences after the Casino are perhaps questionable. Nevertheless, the work of Martin Campbell brings a breath of fresh air to the character and will meet the expectations of the public to see Casino Royale with the intention of seeing good cinema entertainment. Oh, and even if it is a superfluous detail, also know that this new Bond, ethyl than ever, little or nothing cares that their 'Martini' are stirred or mixed. Just want to be them to serve soon. |
1,802 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1657 | Tito Chinchan | Los 300 espartanos | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Epic film about the 300 Spartans who fought the Persian forces in the Thermopilas Strait. A must see classic of ancient battles. There is no great special effects, but or lack making it. The script, sets, actors, in any amount, makes a peliculón of those you must see. | 300 criticism has now the glorious Tito Chinchan, measures with the same reliability goals from Romario, who says that he already has 1000 accounting to which they gets their children when playing with them. And of course, what better to critique 300 that criticize the movie 300. Nothing, of course. So I went to the origins, to the source, at the beginning and I've seen the original film 300. None of the fag that based on the comic by Fran Miller, no, no, no. Much better this, which has that stale taste of old film, where the fighting are childish, but that everything stays involved in the drama of a good script and actors delivered a great final result. OLE than most nice peliculón.The film is the Emperor Xerxes of the Persians who decides that he has to conquer the world. At that then those who took the cat to the water in the West were the Greeks, so the Persians sent the most powerful army ever known against the Hellenes. The latter, for a change, not completed the danger, not quierían see it or what was I, so only the Spartans and Athenians were allied against the Persians. But not all the Spartans, who said they were on a spree and not out there or kidding, if not only 300 to stop thousands of pissed-off Persians who were going to leave this done a lot. Then with two balls that fought these Spartans. Sparta alive and the mother that bore, alive.I think that the topic is already being enough profiling, no? The film tells a story of Government intrigue, posturing, honour and courage, of impossible amorios, aberrant betrayals, fighting, power and miseries. And all seasoned with those impossible dialogues and some very elaborate decorations. But to elaborate. The fight scenes falter a bit, but it does if not enlarge the epic of the film. And this is to say nothing of the end, makes the hair like hooks from 23. Wow, and the voiceover that tells us the facts that happened later us levantá of the couch to go to release Sparta, or at least to go for some popcorn, or piss.In short, epic film about the 300 Spartans who fought the Persian forces in the Thermopilas Strait. A must see classic of ancient battles. There is no great special effects, but or lack making it. The script, sets, actors, in any amount, makes a peliculón of those to be see. tremendous clasicón!!!! |
1,803 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3628 | Dario Lavia | La Mujer del Cuadro | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Film of Fritz Lang who feels some of the principles of Film Noir. | A Professor (Edward g. Robinson) comes in contact with the attractive model (Joan Bennett) in a table that is displayed after a stained glass window. From that moment, gets carried away by the taste of the forbidden and ends in the Department of the young, being involved in a murder when you must defend against the attack of a furious lover (Arthur Loft) and its subsequent investigation, carried out by a shrewd district attorney who is a friend of the protagonist (Raymond Massey). The appearance of a hampón (Dan Duryea) that it's blackmail the women, complicating the picture, and the protagonist must be thinking as a man of science, cold and methodical, resolution of the incident without affecting his reputation and his family. The plot is complicated, as if it were a nightmare, and both protagonists are forced to trust one another to save his own skin. While going up the thermometer of intrigue, an exceptional collection of tasty dialogues, moments of tension and situations that will then be common in film-noir also is compiling. Above (or below) of this plot strongly subject to the conventions of the genre, one can sense an attempt to combine elements of psychoanalysis and give a meaning to the relationships between the characters. The resolution of the film, with a not very appreciated in its time resource, perhaps to operate as a "happy ending", but also gives the opportunity to add an interesting new dimension to the plot. As if all this were little, Robinson and Bennett's performances are impeccable, like lighting, photography and most of the side, which ultimately leaves us one of the best films of Fritz Lang in his American stage. |
1,804 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2064 | Patri | Flores rotas | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Killed with Bill Murray watching to infinity or driving times can be extremely boring, but they have the function of transmitting the passage of time and the banal existence. | Broken flowers is a comedy that does not cause laughter, with a subtle and ironic humor, the style of its protagonist, Bill Murray, just sitting and staring at the empty already conveys it sad that his life is and how bad that is let to pass the time without doing anything. It isn't an actor with great versatility, has at least not shown, always makes the same kind of characters, but is his style and is unmatched, making people laugh without doing absolutely nothing.Killed with Bill Murray watching to infinity or driving times can be extremely boring, but they have the function to convey the passage of time and the banal existence, but abused these moments with a music not accompanied by the more accurate way.Actresses come soon, because the absolute protagonist is Bill Murray, but are fine, Sharon Stone, Jessica Lange and Julie Delpy are some of those women taking part (or part) of the life of the protagonist and the truth is hard to believe that this man is a "Don Juan" and conquer all these women with its charm, because it does not have.What is clear is that those who like Bill Murray movie will love, and which not him endure better that they see not. |
1,805 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1114 | Tito Chinchan | Ratónpolis | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Targeting an audience often animated film. Action and humor in a recording original and surprising, that shows animated cinema can make blockbusters as effective as beings of flesh and bone. And surely more cheap. | Clay animation has always been something magical and amazing. It can be supermala as argument, but just thinking that someone has created these wonders with the same which tí you only served to make "churros" superlargos staining the table to your mother, already put the hairs as hooks. As this film is in reverse, with animation, made drawings of plasticine. Curioso.la film is a pet mouse who lives with a rich girl. For reasons unknown, they leave and stays him as King of the House at the worst possible moment. A rat strain by the drains and is installed in the House. Surprisingly, this win and expels our "fine" friend to the world of British, where will fight to return to the comfort of your home.The thing to be honest, has not been bad. My average pumpkin says that it is hell and snoring in the third frame, everything is said. But to me I have not found so loose. Is true that the story is very mozalbetes, but has funny giños to the elderly, such as the continuous references to James Bond (so fashionable now) or the subtle inclusion of Desafio Total (Prize for who to see). The argument is not much worse than any action of real actors, with their introduction, his knot and its outcome, but instead of explosions and challenges to physics, we have shots and ingenuity to solve problems. Deserves special mention animation, given that they have achieved that the drawings seem clay dolls, was it necessary? Man, not what, but original if that is.In short, focused on an audience often animated film. Action and humor in a recording original and surprising, that shows animated cinema can make blockbusters as effective as beings of flesh and bone. And surely more cheap. |
1,806 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3633 | Raccord | Todos los Hombes del Presidente | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Names keep falling in my head. | There are novels needing to incorporate maps and family trees so that the reader can understand something of the plot. This film is the perfect example that such practices should not be in the literature (do?) sword and witchcraft and give the jump to the movies. When all the characters spit 12 names per minute of undersecretaries, directors, delegates and Commissioners of the White House and environs, the feeling is the less confusing:-Oh my God, Mr. Coleman will have not worked for - Yes, Jeff Perkins - that is the Secretary of the head of the Senate library!-Yes need to talk with Ms. Dreyfood that you confirm us; She knew the brother-in-law of the cousin of Perkins-Oh God! The brother-in-law of the cousin of Perkins, is Bob Jones, a Commissioner for the re-election of Senator Martin!-everything fits!Total, you do not learn anything. But see parade Dustin Hoffman and Robert Redford by Washington, always running and talking with excitement of the next government source that will give them the next clue to reach the scoop we all know (that Nixon was a choricete) has a charm that you cagas, although only intuyas that is the movie.Also I want to be a reporter as worship, dynamic and with a sexual life so little busy as these two; so from that I saw "The Edukators" (still pray that karma to give me the opportunity to get into a fight to defend a beggar) no other film had left such mark in my weak and impressionable personality. |
1,807 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/599 | Ricardo Marquina | Paura Nella Città dei Morti Viventi | 3 | 5 | muchocine | This film was released not complete in any country, because the work offered to the censors of the time was not trivial... | A priest, somewhat tempering, commits suicide by hanging of a pine tree in the American city of Dunwich, city settled on an old settlement of witches. This is the signal that the gates of the underworld are opened, releasing the dead of eternal sleep, making them return to the terror of the living world. Meanwhile, in New York, a journalist saves a beautiful young woman, to which all breed dead after a session of Spiritism, of being buried alive. The journalist and the aforementioned young will depart at the difficult work to avoid the dead to dominate Earth.So is "Paura Nella Città dei Morti Viventi" (fear in the city of the living dead in its Spanish Edition). Film directed and written by the incombustible and opportunistic Lucio Fulci in 1980, who achieved this time its more compact, smooth and interesting film.Well done and enjoyable course, "Paura Nella Città dei Morti Viventi" is a film poor in nuances and blurred in his argument. Although well developed, was missing many "ques", leaving large unexplained part of what happened. Mediocre performers and delirious, the Italian Fabio Frizzi music, are the worst of the film, however, her do not detract at all, dating back the interest to blow good gore, explicit and free of charge, from the hands of the master Rossi.Y Gino is that Fulci after nausea without reason, (a) the major displeasure and the restless startle. So much so that this movie not released complete in any country, because the work offered to the censors of the time was not trivial. In fact you can find it in the network, complete, Yes, but with scenes in German, other Italian Spanish. an international cutting as escape censorship.By harsh scenes has a few, as it shows a button: when the zombie priest "hypnotizes" a young hacéndole vomit all his digestive system. Wow, must be made casings heart.There is no doubt that Fulci is an opportunistic pig who sought profit in the wake of the pull of the zombie genre, but was not the only, in addition to do well and give us many anthologies scenes. It will be a son of a bitch, Yes, but it is our son of a bitch. Without a doubt the best, or least bad for some, Fulci creature. Good luck with it. |
1,808 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2069 | Rafa Ferrer | Infiel | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Found me an excellent, brilliant film and even for a long time that it did not enjoy anything as good on the small screen of television. | Said Pedro Ruiz in his book "Think I." which "horns, not hurt when you leave, but when you look them in the mirror" nothing more true and under this premise tour the plot plot of this film. Provided that I have spoken of Diane Lane I have cited this film and as I went with Colin Farrell and "Tigerland" I have finished watching her to see if that nomination Oscar which took Diane was for something or just mere coincidence, it is also true that after this movie has been able to do what has been given the real WINSas a sign things as "Under the Sun of the Tuscan" tape for his own showcasing. But I roll not it up more and let's what leads us, for those who ever have suffered from these ugly and unsightly bultitos on both sides of the head (called horns) this film serves to feel identified with what it shown, if I put the hand on the heart and I must say that in the past I have had horns (or "billets" as they say in my neighborhood) and since then it had acted as acts have Richard Gere in the tape, on the other hand, need to be "hang" to the Sr.Gere husband and go out there to look for another. Found me an excellent, brilliant film and even for a long time that it did not enjoy anything as good on the small screen of television, has been of those movies that I paladeaba and I reveled in myself putting me rather than the characters. You can already see, one who gets fast task. I am of those who like to "suffer at home"; It is what is cinema, for a couple of short hours those who suffer are others. Diane Lane!Explendida! (I understand and accept his nomination), Richard Gere as I said and Olivier Martinez although he is an actor that I do not like especially nice (what I've seen of him I am not convinced too) the kid meets and does not entirely bad. The direction of Adrian Lane is also sobervia and music helps to lead the story where it should. I imagine that I will be the last people who has seen this movie so that too many recommendations, right? That you have not seen it like me?Then another pal' boat! |
1,809 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2743 | Kiko de España | Habitación sin salida | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Variant of the saga of Roth, of 8 Mm or the debut of Alejandro Amenábar this thriller of 81 minutes including credits beginning and end can be seen with great ease. | It may be a silly day or may be after seeing what I've seen fairly acceptable anything becomes something good and recommended, but the case is that Vacancy has seemed to me, among other things, a very honest film.Variant of the saga of Roth, of 8 Mm or the debut of Alejandro Amenábar this thriller of 81 minutes including credits beginning and end can be seen with great ease.A couple in crisis and on the verge of divorce, a wrong way and a road motel run by a Robby Krieger that turns out to be an important hijoputa are the ingredients.The couple protagonist carries the entire weight of the film and they are pretty well the two.The movie does not provide neither more nor less than what it promises and that in the times runs is appreciated. |
1,810 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/535 | Daniel Galindo | La increíble historia de Caperucita Roja | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Sins of irregular, because the balance leans towards the first hour: intense, rapid, with spark and turning around to all the referents of literature and cinema. | As Shrek this entertaining production unleashes our ties to the universe of legends, making that it tambalee. When we have already visited this area of fantasy accompanied by traditional guides, comes to meet ingenious and courageous proposals, i.e. outside almost all the clichés and prejudices, causing our cognitive acuity.By the way make the argument, the incredible but true! Little Red Riding Hood story reminds the of who framed Roger Rabbit? but not being of Comic characters in keeping with that in his day raised tapes as the Princess Bride and the recent the secret of the Brothers Grimm. Begins with an alternative to the classic story of the girl entering the House of his grandmother, solving an enigma that has little to do with expected: someone is boycotting the network of bakeries of the forest; the suspects include a journalist, an aspiring actor, a distributor of sweets with other sights and a not so anchored grandmother in her role. This police plot formed the genesis of the story that we all know, but the child classic has been revised. If it were a dish, the result would be a deconstruction of the traditional ingredients product: are the same, but presented differently. This exercise of animation in 3-D peca of irregular, that the balance is tilted towards the first hour: intense, rapid, with spark and turning around to all the referents of literature and cinema. Rupture of schemes that is not continued during the denouement, flat and predictable, a simple resolution away from hilarious original research. Altogether, the incredible. It proposes a fun trip to the forest imagined thanks to thousands of oral stories and reflected on paper first by Charles Perrault and later by the Grimm. The adaptation takes the premise of "not missing nor a detail": the grass moves with the gentle breeze, also Caperu double basses. It rewinds the action and the versions of the same fact review with ease, including winks to pursue the laugh. And we do not forget irreverent characters such as the goat sentenced to eternal singing make their appearance in the adventure. As usual, the weight of the dubbing in the Spanish version is entrusted to very known as Leonor Watling, Amparo Baró and Carlos Latre actors, but Anabel Alonso, the famous Dori in finding Nemo, who better lends his voice to a minor but essential character: an accelerated squirrel called Balita, as all the characters, contributing to associate the traditional tale in contemporary audiovisual narrative schemes employed in video clips and TV spots. |
1,811 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3353 | Andrés Pons | Mil gritos tiene la noche | 3 | 5 | muchocine | All very typical saves thanks to the brutality of the deaths and the charm given off despite the mediocrity. | With American production Valencian Juan Piquer Simón: "SUPERSONICMAN", "The cleft" done as is usual a bad film with interpretations of laughter a script already thousand times seen in thousands of previous slashers, some with the same producers as for example the day of the innocents. Series b of the era actors walk giving the film an international imprint with Christopher GEORGE "The terminator" or EDMUND PURDOM "Director and actor do not open until Christmas". All very typical saves thanks to the brutality of the deaths and the charm given off despite the mediocrity. |
1,812 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3556 | Dragon negro | Beowulf | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Beowulf is the animated cinema closer to the reality that has been done to date and is worth seeing above all on a big screen, where most appreciate both its achievements and its flaws. | Yesterday I went to the driver, the only place in Barcelona where Beowuld is projected in 3D. The first sensation is quite spectacular and during the first minutes one is overwhelmed by a lot of details that seem made exclusively in order to enjoy them in that format, things that appear behind one object that appears will collide with you and camera movements to enjoy and that makes you feel as if you were in the movie. Once past this first sensation one gets used and the film enjoys equal, up almost forget that this one watching it in 3D, just highlight characters ahead of others and ahead of the scenarios and specific scenes, especially the battles, one again to enjoy the 3D in all its glory with amazing effects. Years towards that did not see a film a movie as well, the last was one of the last films of Freddy, specifically the final stretch where you put the glasses and thus entered the nightmare, the sense is similar but somewhat improved now.Entering himself in the film, Beowulf proposes us a trip to the human ambition and then repentance and redemption in the hands of the protagonist. We work on the characters and he ignores quite continuous action, there are scenes of fighting but these are strategically placed so that the scenes of dialogues do not become bored and where the spectacle that is likely to achieve, with a few movements of camera and very successful and amazing choreography is. Action we consistently puts in a village that gives the feeling of being very small and has few inhabitants and a small and gloomy room where celebrate the holidays, has been omitted from therefore seek a flamboyant stage and the, already cansinas, scenes where the camera flies over the impressive structures. This subtracts epic grandeur, and the story that the general feeling is that everything is happening in a small and isolated place and that it lacks importance or greatness.In the animation, it must be said that things have much improved since that Final Fantasy, though still way to achieve a credible perfection. And it is, by very successful that it is here, there is always some scene, some focus and some character that sings in excess. The male characters are those who best standing out, both the King and Beowulf have truly realistic moments. In the negative section we have women, especially the young Queen and the other girl in the second half. These characters where most see the limitations of animation and more cold and unreal seem. And this seems as to show real faces they have to have thousands of imperfections, freckles, spots, wrinkles, hairs and more, when these defects appear, sometimes in excess, the faces are articulated in a more precise and real. But in the case of two young women whose skin is white and smooth, it shows that it fails there something, even in the female character most successful is that of Angelina Jolie, there are moments where something fails and seems more porcelain than real sided.Anyway, Beowulf is animated cinema closer to the reality that has been done to date and is worth seeing above all on a big screen, where most appreciate both its achievements and its flaws. In the film it must be said that it is very entertaining and that it is not for nothing film for children, but that it is clearly geared to an adult audience, which is appreciated. If we add to this the luxury of seeing in 3D, the experience becomes something really advisable. |
1,813 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3460 | Andrés Pons | Ginger Snaps | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Ginger Snaps was a genuine surprise in 2000 bringing a freshness to the genre that in those moments after successes of the type series Scream lived his lowest moments. | Few teenage horror films are capable of a study out that crucial step for life topics. Perhaps one of the most outstanding was the CARRIE of BRIAN DE PALMA. Not the subgenre of Lycanthropy offered too many joys, howls or an American Werewolf in London are the light within shadows that offer this type of films.GINGER SNAPS was a genuine surprise in 2000 bringing a freshness to the genre that in those moments after successes of the type series SCREAM lived his lowest moments.While the proposal seems to be the typical teen horror film, is distancing itself from the beginning offering a strange relationship between the two sisters performed protagonists they repeated their roles brilliantly by EMILY PERKINS and KATHERINE ISABELLE is two sequels that although minor remained interesting.The strong part is the transformation of GINGER going from a dark teenager to attract all the boys, unleashing an appetite by blood and sex in her narrated by rookie John FAWCETT I disappoint in his second film THE DARK with the bowels.His stunning soundtrack is another aspect to be highlighted, special effects its great handicap especially at the end where the transformation comes to an end with something mediocre results.However this is not without prejudice to taste one of the best films on Lycanthropy and adolescents carried out with a force long horror film not provided. |
1,814 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/202 | Andrés | Plan oculto | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The director Gets the way: makes a tape of gender while continuing to crush us with four ideas that has had since he took a camera | I have the fact of seeing this film at one of those rare occasions where friends are in agreement to go to the movies. In this case it was more strange because, despite having been accompanied by, I had to see the movie only. "The feast of the goat", which I had already seen was winning in the choice of the group. Then chose "The perfect plan" or "Inside man" (2005) as who makes time. It was not very convinced, because the previous "stalk" of the director ("A Spike Lee Joint"), "She hates me" (2004) I was disappointed and the trailer of "The hidden plan" I smelled film commissioned. After five minutes I realized that was completely wrong. To begin "The hidden plan" it is a very entertaining film, this makes any subsequent comments pure rhetoric. This tape will attest to the quality of "make us-forget-of-all" sometimes has the film. Who does not like the suspense? Well well, here the old Spike offers a concentrated stock of suspense from the start. The admirable is that, in addition, the director Gets the way: makes a tape of gender while continuing to crush us with four ideas that has had since he took a camera. The film begins when "the thief more skull of the world" (Clive Owen) tells us that he has the perfect plan to Rob a Bank and that what we hear well because he will not explain it twice. A minute later: he and his band have all customers and staff of the Bank in the face against the floor. However, what starts here is a war of brains. Criminals, police officers and others put in the game to prove who is the most vivid. The first big idea: criminals force all hostages to dress like them and release a few. Police, baffled, believed to be part of the band and spends his life questioning them. Meanwhile the Bank owner call Madeline (Jodie Foster), "the most cunning dog of the city", so it rescue a dirty washcloth hidden in the Bank bobeda. But Keith (Denzel Washington), the detectivo in charge of the case, will not leave any woman come to mandonearlo and begins to put the batteries. Cops and robbers is striving to prove which side are the best neurons. Secret negotiations, hidden microphones, misleading recordings, implausible claims, anything goes to stay as the smart guy. And the most fun, all this sprinkled with fine Street humour of Spike Lee, this ingenuity that would leave without words to any criollazo.In the course of the film, as diluting a syrup in this soup of suspense, Spike makes us we traguemos some spoonfuls of its political message. New York no longer that racist, violent and unscrupulous mishmash. A city, as say Vallejo, populated by "embracing wolves". The tripping, partnerships and the insults that circulate between the protagonists are simply symptoms of their daily struggle to stay with the largest meat piece. Large fish or fish small, black hand or white collar, commit their peccadilloes to progress. And this is what has always been so roast to final Spike.Al of both functions I found with my friends. They also had liked his film. Comments, comparisons and weights on the way to the place where we llenaríamos us the stomach. We both like the film and then welcome is the mayonnaise. |
1,815 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/149 | Alvaro Oliva | Destino final 3 | 1 | 5 | muchocine | If second parts were never good, because third already or I am telling you | Curiosity made me get close to see the new film by James Wong, who had already directed the first part of this series, and that because say it that I liked. On this occasion I cannot say the same, if second parts were never good, because third already or I tell you. You could already guess that the movie would not be no masterpiece, but it is that the catastrophe and the ordeal that was going to be put up all the footage could see already from the beginning. If something characterized the saga is by its starting time in which occurs the tragedy that will later be a feeling of the protagonist so vary the course of death. In "Final destination 3" takes place in a park of attractions, specifically in a giant roller coaster, but the truth is that neither using a medium so enabling Wong achieves that us between Vertigo, or fear or tension go in a vehicle so fast and so much anguish creates in many people.The script is predictable, with dialogues really simple, fall is more vulgar and stereotypes with some sequence that really ashamed. If we already start from this basis it is difficult that you can do something worthy, so acting level you can imagine how it will be. I have to say that the star Mary Elizabeth Winstead (Sky High, The Ring 2) is saved from burning, than seen apparently is not. The funniest are the deaths of the protagonists, that make the film to regain a little interest lost in these ramblings about who will be the next to die and these interpretations that make some pictures released in the amusement park and serving them as a prevention guide. Most regrettable and worrying is that it is having good fundraising and to achieve a product so bad there behind a large group of professionals. "Final destination 3" returns to place low hours to fantasy film and horror, in terms of quality that remakes and absurd films at the box office it is surviving. The truth is that recommend this film would be very bad milk, but if I have to do, the fiercest public will be those teenagers who enjoy entertainment with lazy exercise and seeking predictable situations, children's dialogues, see a pair of tits and a little blood. |
1,816 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3416 | Hombre Lobo | Dead silence | 3 | 5 | muchocine | They may have been invalid expectations which had to fear that night with her or my bias, but this new Odyssey of James Wan seems that it gathers enough merits for a comfortable approved. | Judging by the presentation comes wrapped her second movie, Dead Silence (2007) (renamed in Spain as silence from evil), seems that the young director James Wan wanted this time take the opposite direction of the tape that made him famous, Saw (2004); on this occasion we will not find almost offal or fixation by torture, much less the bathroom left the lost frames of David Fincher. While there is one that gore later in this story, the director has chosen this time by a new recreation of the American Gothic, in which the ghost of a ventriloquist named Mary Shaw makes present to kill the young wife of the protagonist. Guided by the Doll left at the scene of the massacre, this now has to return to the village of his childhood, a place in decadence where the inhabitants even dare to revive the memory of that spectrum that triggered revenge on their families. This is the beginning of a film that I will say at once, I enjoyed at all times, in spite of the bad press it has received. They may have been invalid expectations which had to fear that night with her or my bias, but this new Odyssey of James Wan seems that it gathers enough merits for a comfortable approved.The plot will undoubtedly recall many plot part of nightmare on Elm Street (1984), and the truth is that similarities do not missing, at least with the first delivery, before that Freddy Krueger became a full of jokes comedian. That is not the only source to which its screenwriter Leigh Whannell and Wan we refer, references to the best work of Dario Argento are more than evident, including a climax in an abandoned Theatre whose images have been practically modelled Inferno (1980). The plot also follows the same structure as a more or less recent film: in the darkness (2003), of which very few have been mentioned and that however has a nearly identical story in which the main difference is the lei-motiv of the ventriloquismo. And speaking of this, please, forget to Chucky, very that a sinister doll is the center of the advertising campaign of Dead Silence, there is no any similarity. What do recognize you Wan is managed resurrect this type of film that runs away from the easy guts and is dedicated to the construction of "scenarios of fear": the ghost town, the old cemetery devoured by the forest and the huge abandoned theatre are elements that are inviting us into a world completely fictional, characteristic of those stories of terror than, until not long ago, they shunning the sociological content or the force of "impact". Who see the film will have to decide whether it can succeed or not. For me, I insist, is done quite well.Much of the negative criticism it has received this tape are due (I think) to its director, Saw was a film that sparked very mixed reactions, so the desire to crucify James Wan will have been large enough for many people. In any case, I think that on this occasion has given us a film more ambitious, very different from its predecessor in the style of terror that seeks to show, and that among some of their virtues has the go to the point: "research" of the protagonist not extends forever, and the story moves fast and so that anytime something is happeningwithout long and tedious transition sequences or romantic sub-tramas to disrupt history. At the narrative level, the greater downside I can find perhaps the character of a polyphenic Donnie Whalberg, which adds absolutely nothing apart from an inexplicable comic and thuggish tone completely out of place. Beyond that, the "villain" is very well made, and the film contains some genuinely sinister sequences, as the flashback tells the origins of Mary Shaw, as well as some of his appearances that stand out for their use of suggestive rather than the cheap scare or free brutality, something which many filmmakers nowadays seem have been forgotten, and that certainly did not expect to find in the alleged Saw.Por director who has problems; of course many of its best moments are taken from other films and of course that the script has several outputs implausible and elitists, but no more than the orphanage (2007) or 28 weeks later (2007), films that enthusiasts have earned praise from many that calling this tape soon in southern Lebanon less than garbage. I would encourage to take a look. At least I've been pleasantly surprised. |
1,817 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1752 | JPastor | 300 | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Impressive. The fight scenes and the choreography are incredible, and leave the war stories of Troy in almost an anecdote. I saw in original version with subtitles, that help, because they use from time to time something strange grammatical turns... | Much told me about the movie 300, and although not me I read the Frank Miller comic - a God in this world - that is inspired, had wanted to see if adaptation is worth. And I already believe that it is worth. The two hours justitas that narrate the history of the battle of the pass of Thermopylae in 480 BC I went in a sigh, and I enjoyed every moment.Ago much who knew Miller was a genius, because among other things was responsible for legendary Marvel as the minisaga scripts?Born again? Daredevil, a classic sure that many comic book fans know, but already not collect, so I lost the track this and other artists of the eighth art. But it is clear that if one vale, okay. Apparently Miller was very over during production - something others pass, see the case of "From Hell" and the crappy movie that came out from a masterful comic - and this has allowed that the film faithfully reflects the greatness of the comic. I would say that it is very likely to exceed even to the graphic novel, because the film is pure plasticity in movement.Digital each frame shows impossible environments and scenarios, but do it in a way that is strikingly akin to the story. A history that is certainly some freedoms on what happened in reality - simply epic. Actors embroider. All of them from Gerard Butler - a spectacular Leonids - to Lena Heady, that as in other movies, is as a cheese in addition to do well.The fight scenes and the choreography are amazing, and dejan war stories of Troy in almost an anecdote, and the script – which is all in a film - does more than help. I saw in original version - with subtitles, that help because when in when they use grammatical turns something outsiders--and that because it is the lemon pear.Do do Imprescindible.PD: good Netámbulo has already made its own assessment of some scenes? suspiciously julais? does the movie, but the aspects less serious (as of the patronage of Suchard, tiny chocolate bars which had the Spartans by abdominal) he speaks now:-) PD 2: recently left meneada a column of Pérez-Reverte in which the always witty writer spoke of?The other 300 ′, the almogáraves, who were also from here you hope. But as says Arturito, as we are in Spain, national does not sell, and they have been practically forgotten. |
1,818 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/819 | Caruco | Lola Montes | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Your images look us now maybe obsolete, old-fashioned, but also we climb in his time because?Lola Montes? It contains a very special essence. It would not escape its viewing. | Prior to the critique of "Borat", a recommendation im-pres-cin-di-ble. Sure we have all heard talk about a hundred thousand times of masterpieces such as "Psycho", "2.0001, an Odyssey of the space", "Casablanca", "what the wind", "Citizen Kane", "Skirts with crazy", "at the end of the escape"? and we could continue to include hundreds, thousands of titles.But few have been one of the largest and most forgotten films of the history of the cinema, that "Lola Montes" than the German Max Ophüls, most remembered for undisputed classics of romanticism as "Letter from an unknown woman" (1948), "The round" (1950) or "do Madame of?" (1953), filmed posthumously.Precisely yesterday, Tuesday 21st, reissued on DVD "Lola Montes", that was during its premiere in 1955, the most expensive production of European cinema, and also a famous failure at the box office.It recreates the life of a famous courtesan of the 19th century, of Cuban origin, endowed with a beauty and irresistible sensuality. Desengañada love decided to live freely, defying the rules of his time. It became a celebrity due to her multiple lovers, which included sultans, tsars or Kings, and his life ended up being exhibited in a show of circus where she is the main star.Love and power in a trapeze.With Lola Montes (1820? 1861) erected in circus phenomenon begins the film Max Ophüls. Do narrated so little conventional, Baroque, exquisite, elegant, full-color and that? never reached attract too much public. However, if they are looking for any other comments also read wonders of this film. and is not for less! Ophüls traces a parallel of grotesque proportions between the spectacle of the life of Lola and which takes place under a tent full of dwarves, funambulistas, Trapeze artists, dancers, horses, theatrical scenes or shadows projected trás curtains. It's the circus of life!Legend and reality intertwine in the troubled history of a unique female that even shake Governments. And as the master of ceremonies (do Peter Ustinov,? unrecognizable!) will telling lovemaking acrobatics and the social and political rise of the heroine (Martine Carol, priceless!), more steps will rise Lola in the number of its role Trapeze.Humor is always subtle and with taste. For example, when King Ludwig I of Bavaria (Anton Walbrook) must choose the painter of portrait of Lola makes it according to the criterion of "slowness" of the artist's work, and achieve in this way hold more time in your country.The 12 perfections.Or to reflect fun sway, the chain of command and the movement, which can trigger the simple order of an influential character among his vassals. For example, in "does Madame of?" was a Pearl Necklace lost in a theater of Opera, and in "Lola Montes" is the order of Louis I to his servants to bring him, as soon as possible, thread and needle to sew the dress of the Lady.And I said, Martine Carol and Peter Ustinov are both absolutely memorable.Also highlights the lyrics of the song the master of ceremonies dedicated to the whore and that says something as well as: "Lola has 12 perfections." 3 dolcezze: heart, fists and hands. 3 Follies: eyes, hair and feet. 3 brevedades: arms, ears, and nose. 3 curves: figure, mouth and breasts. The men are condemned to offer fortunes. "And you offer your body, but the soul you reservations."Your images look us now maybe obsolete, old-fashioned, but also us climb at the time why "Lola Montes" contains a very special essence. It would not escape its viewing. Don't believe me? They will be surprised. |
1,819 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4269 | Yul B. | Mortadelo y Filemón: Misión Salvar la Tierra | 3 | 5 | muchocine | More fun than the first. For fans of Mortadelo y Filemón. | Change of director to this sequel it has sat well. I'm not saying that Javier Fesser is bad (because it is not much less) nor that wasn't the right director to address the first adventure of Mortadelo y Filemón in movies with real actors. This charismatic filmmaker was able to give his personal stamp (and for that they chose) to a first film foray into flesh and blood of these beloved Comic characters that came out of the bogeyman of Francisco Ibáñez and many hours of fun made happen to several generations of Spanish (and guiris) in other countries. And then the taquillazo.But precisely for this reason, for wearing that particular and characteristic touch that always accompanies Fesser his works, 'La Gran Aventura de Mortadelo y Filemón' escrow resembled too aesthetically one of his best-known works, and that to me I love, 'El Milagro de p. Tinto'. This small detail stripped somehow the prominence, the essence, spirit and personality Ibáñez has given to his most famous creatures.I believe that Miguel Bardem has been able to better capture that same essence, spirit and personality of mort and Phil, and has managed to direct a sequel more in tune to the aesthetics and the modus operandi as crazy with serving this pair of agents of the T.I.A. and company.This installment of suggestive title, ' Mortadelo y Filemón. Mission: Save the Earth ', it is more fun and entertaining than the first, and has more pace and is much more understandable on dialogues than the original (still I remember what I had trouble understanding the sentences of some actors such as Benito Pocino, Janfri Coronado or Eduardo Gómez script). A succession of comical gags enough good made public (mainly adolescents) will drop many sincere and spontaneous laughter in my session who had faith in that the 'facelift' directional had been for the better. But, in addition to the change of director, other factors make this patriotic film a pleasant entertainment. The plot that has fuck from here and there of the collection of published comics so far, well written and told, is one of them: the planet is facing a big threat: a great drought that end with all of us and that will try to take advantage of the evil Botijola (Carlos Santos) to convert the drink that bears his name in the replacement of the water. To do this you will have his henchmen to eliminate the water reserves left in the Tierra.Un attack in the MoMA, where the best undercover agents of the world met to try to expose the evil Botijola, which does not come (Edu Soto) Mortadelo y Filemón (Pepe Viyuela) because they do not speak, just with all of them. Two disastrous the T.I.A. agents will now have to put their differences aside and reunited again to save the land of the great drought and to protect your machine from the rain, invented to recover the lost water and teacher effect (Janfri Coronado).However, effect is kidnapped by Botijola, but soon get hide the pieces of his invention in different historical moments, using the time machine. Mortadelo y Filemón will travel to the past to recover valuable invention, with the invaluable help of Ophelia (Berta Ojea) and following the orders of the Super (Mariano Venancio).The film is arguably set with as much regularity, order and harmony that you passed in a sigh. And that desire to not end is a good sign in view of infumables tapes of endless end walk through our cinemas.The special effects are another point in favor of the tape. In 'La Gran Aventura de Mortadelo y Filemón' the FX were a very important element to move with fidelity to the big screen the implausible and fancy cakes, devices and other almost surreal elements that abound in this pair of agents calamities comiqueras comics. And, as I mentioned earlier, wore the label Fesser, they were the protagonists of the film, so any fictional character might have been victims of them, gave equal that they weren't Mortadelo and Filemón. However, the special effects of this sequel are, for my taste, better than its original, excellent, not only by your invoice, visibly different appearance, but by being more at the service of our protagonistsmaking this surrealism which I talked about appear up to normal and recognizable.And, finally, the change of actor for mort has been a brutal hit. Edu Soto gives a dimension and a few nuances to the role many broader and more likely than Benito Pocino. Pocino was a limited interpreter, who did not know (or could not) get the amount of juice that has the character while Soto so grab by the horns and manages to bring to light the true personality of mort, the master of disguise.Although not only Soto is you should congratulate on her work. As regards the main that repeated, Pepe Viyuela improves quite on his previous performance, perhaps because it is more mature as an actor and appreciates his chemistry with Edu. Mariano Venancio (the Super) and Janfri Coronado (effect) are more subdued and give the right touch to his characters, without exaggerations; Berta Ojea (Ophelia) continues his good online.New, Carlos Santos (Botijola), 'Los Hombres de Paco' Povedilla, makes a credible evil despite their possession of good people. And Alex O'Dogherty (Todoquisque, Arturo Cañas in 'Camera Cafe') represents a hilarious henchman. The appearance of Carmen Ruiz (Toribia) as the sister of mort is priceless.Only a drawback would be the film, good rather two, which do not depend on the work and effort of the director or actors from the rest of the technical and artistic team: first, that it is virtually impossible that the viewer can appreciate in the same way that makes it the reader of comic book series Mortadelo y Filemón the amount of details jets but ingenious Ibáñez left corner or at the bottom of their bullets.Bardem has worked in that I take account of them, but would require a double session of the same movie to capture details such as, e.g., the micro from one news presenter caught to the flap of the jacket with the clothing clip, a mobile phone with a raspberry as headset, curious signs as the 'Jilton' Hotel or all almost one hundred announcing ' 3000 bathtubs to 3 euros'all that is and takes the 'pescadillac', or a background vocals who answers to a seller top-blanket that offers precisely on a beach the pirated copy of this same film which we are talking about saying 'I me her have already downloaded'. And this is only 1% of other things that I have not mentioned and others that I have not seen or heard for sure.And the second, very obvious, that this film is for absolute stalwarts of Mortadelo y Filemón. If you are not I recommend that you spare you paste the entry because all she (I mean the movie) you will seem insane. PS: I'm still missing the two hairs of the head of the 'head'; and the real beard of effect, not those somethings pelajos given to Coronado. |
1,820 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/245 | Alvaro Oliva | Vecinos invasores | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Comply with the screenplay, dialogues and jokes very funny, they get neighbors invaders us to fresh and very enjoyable | The new proposal for Dreamworks Animation meets the expectations and becomes an entertaining film that will delight children and adults. The argument is very typical, that tells us how RJ, a raccoon, has a time limit to recover food from a bear, if he doesn't want to be devoured by it. And so it embauca to a family of animals that have turtle Verne as visible head, so help him get it, obviously without telling them the truth.At that time unique animals Gawain his world to venture into ours, and so begin to dissect our way of life. The film despite making a critique of our Customs does not remain exclusively in this, and goes to show us their journeys in which will be apparent the importance of values such as loyalty and friendship. An aspect that had me concerned was the dubbing, and say this because despite being regarded our country as one of the best in this field, lately is being fashionable count famous actors to embody the animated characters, and in many cases the result is disastrous. In its original version this invaders patrol is made up of Bruce Willis and Nick Nolte, Garry non Avril Lavigne among others, and our version we are to Michel Brown, Luis Merlo, Isabel Ordaz and Eduardo Soto to cite some.And I say that I was concerned because this time they saved from burning, and seem quite appropriate for the roles. Maybe that the tape with dubbing actors won integers, but this is something that we can not check. The truth is the script to comply, providing the movie actions during plan mission impossible, dialogues and jokes very funny, they manage to hedge us to fresh and very enjoyable. Definitely a good choice for the beginning of summer marked by the world, the beach and the return of Superman. |
1,821 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3077 | José A. Peig | La gran estafa | 4 | 5 | muchocine | The greatest merit of the film is the creation of a dual image represented in the parallelism or symbiosis between Clifford and Howard Hughes. Here, it was time, the first big movie of the season. Do not miss. | The ambition and success are in the new film by Lasse Hallström an exponent concise and devoid of moral judgments, which is conducive to proper tackling an issue that goes beyond the appearance of nostalgic biopic to be the raw representation of humán victim of his own self-worshiping dream and a society that feeds the dream based on interest ratesthen cut, relentless, with the hope of reaching heaven of the gods from the ashes of the failed.Between satire and the bittersweet comedy, the story immerses us in the Genesis, development and conclusion of a process that begins with the ideal of success driven by the outpouring iconic of a character unique at the time - the extraordinary and sinister Howard Hughes - thereafter describes the adventures of Clifford Irving (excellent Richard Gere) in his obsession with writing and earn credibility with a book of great social at a time of great upheavals impact in the social and political order.Very effectively, the film sets the narrative alternating scenes of fiction with real documents that illustrate the popular in North America in the early 1970s agitation. Let's say that the character of Clifford Irving in a neutral position with respect to the Zeitgeist of its time (their motivations are pure ego kept), but the use of montage sequences - through rhythm and dynamic pulse that is linking situations - integrates to the character in the Maremagnum of society which aims to influence based on manipulationsIt handles alleged confidential data and plays to be powerful.The greatest merit of the film is the creation of an additional - and dual - image represented in parallelism, the existential correlation or simply arising symbiosis between Clifford (symbol of the vulgar man who dreams of heaven of the gods) and the same Howard Hughes, whose presence in the film is circumscribed to the mythical image of the icon, image, the tortured imagination of Cliffordtakes the evanescent character that is itself all the myths of all ages. There is a map that summarizes the essence and the message of the film, forceful expression of the power of Fame and the myth of (vulnerable) minds of those who only aspire to become; in the sequence of Clifford presenting his book, his face, malfunctioned, displayed next to Howard Hughes in the background, enormous, a majestic face covering the degeneration of his puppet. The two faces occupy all the level and the film to the end and all, it has a same story of ambition, but since two positions and two different symbols.If to this we add nothing Mannerist of the characters and the story treatment, an exhibition of feelings, paranoia and desires within the framework of an era represented with strong visual and narrative, without making value judgements about the actions of the characters and its inherent meaning, i.e. showing the life as it is to which the own Viewer can participate in the complexity of the represented lifeHere, it was time, the first big movie of the season. Do not miss. |
1,822 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2369 | Francisco Bellón | Café solo... o con ellas | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Only coffee? or with them is simple and simply pathetic crappy filling by the nephew of Agustín Díaz Yanes. If this is the type of films like viewers, it is completely normal that that same audience not likes the Spanish cinema in general. | Still suffering the effects of the already famous survey which said that more than half of Spaniards do not like Spanish cinema. Something so has a myriad of interpretations, analysis and opinion, but does no more than say a great truth, whether we like it or, disagree or not. There are people who think that Spanish Cinema just the same kind of movies over and over again, crazy comedies and dramas intimist and boring. Coffee Solo Debuts to corroborate the theory of these people? or with them, who coincidentally won the audience award in the Festival de Málaga Cine Spanish past. An award which last year obtained the remarkable Un Franco, 14 Pesetas, Carlos Iglesias. Given that thinking, eh?.This raises interesting reflections, because if don't like most of the Spanish film, and it is believed that always do the same, why are they always the same type of movies that more box office collect? Perhaps the problem is more basic, and is that in general the vast majority of spectators attending the rooms go for quick consumption and palomiteros consumer products that for the rest of proposals, be they Spanish, European, American or Asian. Always there are Honorable exceptions, some proposals interesting, fresh or original thanks to the word of mouth out well left of the struggle at the box office. Having said all this, those who are reading these lines must think who subscribes to them has become crazy or something of the sort. No, what happens is that it is much more interesting to write about these philosophical digressions that about the coffee Solo film? or with them. There is nothing good that can be said about such crappy, unless they hopefully will become a taquillazo, which will encourage their investors to repeat in other productions. It is not even honest with the public to whom it is directed, that does not end if the typical juvenile comedy descerebrada, but it has an important romantic background which will cause numerous desertions. It goes without saying that the script, absolutely infamous, it is full of jokes profanity and bad taste are not above the slightest grace. At any time of the tape is reached even to outline a glimmer of a smile, but is to laugh at the absurdity that vomit projectors on the screen.Only coffee? or with them is simple and simply pathetic crappy filling by the nephew of Agustín Díaz Yanes. If this is the type of films like viewers, it is completely normal that that same audience not likes the Spanish cinema in general. |
1,823 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3935 | Ivan Villamel | Cuentos de Terramar | 2 | 5 | muchocine | In short, a film too long, with a history devoid of narrative claw, stereotyped characters and seeking in excess platitudes of a genre, that if had the label of genre in his time. | Debut in the field of the animated feature film by Goro Miyazaki, son of the famous Hayao Miyazaki, started in advance with some expectations maybe too high, not so much self-imposed by the director himself, but rather by simply carry with them so highly praised name. The path chosen by Mr Goro Miyazaki has been divergent in tone with regard to the film from his father, trying to find more a story simple, devoid of metaphorical power, and even visual, moving a little Japanese master of animation film. However, as we shall see below, it has not been able to bring to fruition his debut project.The somewhat confusing history certainly us situated in a world inhabited by the magic, dragons and traffickers of slaves, in a land where it seems that evil has taken over everything, and the population lives embarrassed its depressing days. In that place, a magician saves the life of Arren, actually the son of a King which he same was in charge of murder, and embark on an adventure that takes them to the big city and spend long time staying on a farm owned by a friend of the wizard. Meanwhile, a powerful witch is responsible for subjecting the entire population of the place under its terrible power. This witch seems to know our Wizard protagonist and corresponding confrontation between the two, with the final revelation by Arren and her new friend Theru, which also hides a secret magical will occur towards the end of the story.This magical story sinks its roots in the old tradition of true epic animation film that during the 1980s, and even before, great Domino is based on the Japanese market of gender, with the excellent "The heroic legend of Arislan" or the series of King Arthur at the head. The big problem in this case, is that history progresses very confusingly, with a script that sometimes lacks a sense of logical narrative or a narrative pulse to increase the interest of the Viewer, still more outstanding most of the time the almibaradas reactions of those series of yesteryear type Heidi to the Japanese anime currentas given in the times to excellent parables and metaphors about being human and what surrounds him (without therefore renounce the roots of their culture).Nevertheless, it is fair to acknowledge certain scenes very well achieved, as the description of a decadent city or the great chase sequence of the wolves at the beginning of the film. But the mixture of influences from Celtic culture, the chivalric novel and a child vision of romance and magic, just for making water everywhere. Besides the visual aspect has a mature tone, an animation anquilosada in the past, that while it is nice to see for those nostalgic for the anime in its traditional version, required that at least the force of history was greater, otherwise looks go very aimed to set in other aspects, and that visual aspect, also lame Goro Miyazaki.El film tone cold and distant does not help too to compensate for the tedious becoming of the events, especially the stretch of film that takes place on the farm, elongated until exhaustion in a film that already if it did not offer the level of sufficient density to extend to the two-hour.In addition the character conform to several stereotypes, and therefore the feeling of history already view it is no stranger to the retina of the viewer never. Being especially way certain scenes such as one in which the character of Theru, so reluctant initially to engage in relationship with Arren, gets to sing the corresponding ditty and then both characters seem nothing short of twin souls, really worrying in the eyes of any spectator such amount of decompensation in the creation of logical reactions in the narrative."With obvious influences in addition to other films epic now and always, as that scene in the magician on the back of his horse and his glowing stick, that clearly reminds the wizard Gandalf so popular trilogy, or the final decision on those threatening stairs by which the evil magician takes Theru by way of abduction, and that as cool are in the memory of the viewer more tanning in the fantasy with the estimable movie called film""Into the Labyrinth". Originality is not also, the predominant note in this film worthy of the best product direct to video of the 1980s, within the anime more presivible.Little more than add, perhaps to emphasise the fact that will be tremendously difficult that its director is removed the tag of being the son of a great, and even more if instead of searching for their place in the genre, confined to resort to the more well-trodden ground of heroic fantasy (and not only Japanese of course). With a finish so bombastic and excessive as usual in those films of animation do you a disservice to the truly interesting products, and a final message about life and death tremendously confusing, child and lacking of any rigorous analysis on the true emotions.In short, a film too long, with a history devoid of narrative claw, stereotyped characters and seeking in excess the platitudes of a genre, that already if it had the label of genre (in the sense more predictable and tedious) in his time.Surplus. |
1,824 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/672 | Jeremy Fox | Crank | 1 | 5 | muchocine | An insult to the Viewer, a nonsense plot and shot by a pair of types that have no idea how are wheel a scene of action, decide to shoot from 20 different angles. | "Crank" is one of those movies that could comment on with only a sentence or two; even with a word or two. But before doing so, I will put in background.I went to the movies with the best of the biases, waiting for a film of pure evasion in the style of "The Transporter". A tape to enjoy without more, with cinema and history just to make it entertaining and an actor, Jason Statham, who has some charisma for this type of roles. Nothing more.That is what I was looking for. What I found was an insult to the Viewer, silly plot (even though the premise, without being original, was at least interesting for an action film), shot by a pair of types that have no idea how are wheel a scene of action, decide to shoot from 20 different angles (blessed digital cameras) to be able to stun the public. "That they can not offer film, nor the bad, they offer a game.""Crank" has some of the most embarrassing scenes I've seen in a film. An ideal movie for those who see the film with a single hand or the brain medium gas. I know that all you ever do (about the brain, say) but this is too much.In short, returning to what I said at the beginning, "Crank" is a real hodgepodge that is better to flee. Final rating: 0 out of 10 |
1,825 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1587 | Dragon negro | Un puente hacia Terabithia | 2 | 5 | muchocine | I'm not saying that it is a bad film but is one you sell one thing and then another, and of course because you are disappointed. Despite the film it amuses you and you will like if you have twelve years. | A child, which we might call the pardillo class, becomes friend of the new girl, we could call that will list, and together create a magical world and fantasy where escape from their everyday problems, a world inhabited by trolls, giant, soldiers tiny flying and other creatures, and where they are the masters of everything and reign in harmony. To access this world they pass above the River with a hanging rope, once there will live great adventures and fighting against the Dark Lord.And of course, you see this synopsis, see the trailer, and you read that is the producer of the Chronicles of Narnia, and that you expect? Because a film filled with adventures, chases, fantastic beings and ultimately many special effects. But the reality is rather different, and is that A bridge to Terabithia is more about the problems of two unpopular in school and friendship to children is foja among them later, the film seems begins to move towards something of adventures, just becoming a dramón to beat with a tragedy in its final stretch and whose consequences extend until the end of the film.Special mention should be the father of the boy played by Robert Patrick, an actor every time I see more relegated to second roles and little mounts. A shame because a decade ago it was an actor quite promising.I'm not saying that it is a bad film but is one you sell one thing and then another, and of course because you are disappointed. Despite the film it amuses you and you will like if you have twelve years, if not it is likely to reach a little bored as it was my case. |
1,826 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/450 | Enrique Colmena | Clerks 2 | 2 | 5 | muchocine | What twelve years ago struck mightily for his brazenness, its freshness, its desparpajo, already not surprised now, especially when that language of unusual sexual openness today handles up on television. | It seems that the career of Kevin Smith, who drew attention to powerfully twelve years ago with "Clerks" (see criticism in CRITICALIA), not ends of find their way. After this years dozen, neoyersino filmmaker returns where began, the small, certainly pleasant universe of a couple of grey guys who were waiting in the astroso supermarket in the first part. After a title of interest ("Chasing Amy"), Smith made some incursions into stories by throwing into delirious ("Dogma"; see criticism in CRITICALIA), which did not work too well, so returned to his old characters ("Jay and silent Bob Bob"), and now, definitely, to the same previous landscape, although for the occasion has defenestraded it through a fire and the protagonists spend working in a burger bar district.But the truth is that, that twelve years ago struck mightily for his brazenness, its freshness, its desparpajo, already not surprised now, especially when that language of unusual sexual openness today handles up on television. So, time has not only passed by then somethings clerks of the supermarket, now already thirtysomethings long and without much idea of what to do with their lives, but also by the very concept of "Clerks": before was a joy to listen to these lenguaraces and see how Smith, no idea where they put a camera and shoot decently a filmHe was capable of making us laugh to mode. Now Kevin knows since roll with ease, but the theme catches us something talluditos and the characters sound too well-known: the reasonable Dante; Randal, so bocazas as usual; Jay, as a goat; The silent Bob, who does not speak for do not disturb? Is also true that some scenes are funny and even recordables: see the diatribe on the sagas of "The Lord of the rings" and "Star Wars", or the deslenguado Randal and its "normalization" of an allegedly racist insult; It is also true that sometimes are passed three villages, as in the scene of the zoófilo gimmick of the bachelor party, a donkey too (do literally?) scene. But often the verbiage of the characters bored staff: is difficult to be talking for an hour and a half and did not tiring, and the dialogues are not precisely written by Shakespeare. Anyway, hope that Smith will not fall to a "Clerks III" (although you would not surprise me, because in the USA its fund-raising has multiplied by five budget?), because it is then clear that his work is going to turn on a single topic, and it is already sufficiently squeezed. |
1,827 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3700 | Andrés | La tentación vive arriba | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Extraordinary comedy that has transcended the ages with Marilyn or without it. | This popular Comedy Hollywood gave one of his most emblematic images: Marilyn Monroe wearing its legs in Cinemascope as a result of a mischievous air. Curiously this appearance, the most trumpeted the tape, was vetoed by the censorship by what she was not seen by its early viewers. Anyway, they enjoyed an extraordinary comedy that has transcended the ages with Marilyn or without it. Richard Sherman is a married man who spends a summer in solitude while his wife and son out of holiday. The scrupulous but imaginative Sherman wants to behave well and spend the days quietly, until he meets his new neighbor, irresistible Monroe. Sherman suffers from the delicious torment of staying true to such temptation. More funny monologues that Billy Wilder has written: the superyo and the dreamy side of Sherman faced constantly, away or towards its neighbour to attract it more and more in love with him. In this film, Wilder slips a commentary on the institution of marriage at that time and their brittle longing to be unbreakable. |
1,828 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4026 | Heitor Pan | This is England | 5 | 5 | muchocine | A movie with a pace and an evolution perfect, of those who are able to emerge a huge range of conflicting feelings and that leaves a bitter sediment which takes to disappear. | New ration of stirrer and political film of consciences. After the Italian "my brother is only son", where we were still a teenager through his changes of ideology, paste a leap to the British Isles of the Government of the iron lady in the early 1980s, where a boy of 12 years attend first-hand to the birth of the movement skin head and his right-wing nationalism.Shaun is a lonely kid with a tendency to get into trouble and marked by the death of his father, combatant in the war of Las Malvinas. At that stage of life in which something is needed in what they believe and be accepted by a group, meets a group of skin heads of moderate mood that they treat it as an adult and accept to an equal, despite the obvious age difference.The Group disgregará with the arrival of Combo, a violent and unstable skin which takes the ideas of a right-wing party, forcing Shaun to choose between part of his friends, who prefer to turn back on this change of direction and an ideology which, according to Combo, honors the memory of his father, killed by safeguarding the purity of England so as "my brother is only son" was characterized by the attempt of the director to remain neutral to the narrative, without position itself clearly in any area of the ideological spectrum, the director and screenwriter of "This is England", Shane Meadows, it takes a clear match. Even so, does not load to the skin as a whole head movement, they clearly differentiates those who adopt a violent attitude and extremist, which were simply guided by a distinctive aesthetic and that, later, Usamérica, desmarcarían of the "skin heads National Socialist" giving rise to the Sharp movement (Skin heads against racial prejudice).The director makes use of a series of characters with different characteristics to show camaraderie, rivalries, the joys and stresses of a group of friends, in this case framed in a social movement. Firstly, the protagonist, the more innocent and with the purest look about what happens to your around, without ideas preconceived. A character has the need to process the information as it is occurring because it has no points of comparison and that is that marks the development of history.On the other hand, the people around him. Woody, the most charismatic and leader of the group until that Combo appears in scene and the first to accept and sponsor to Shaun within the group. Milky, the Member of color of the gang, which quickly becomes fondly Shaun and will serve as one of the points of rupture between moderates and extremists. Gadget, an obese kid that time when suffering the mockery of the companions and the first claim to feel accepted by the new Combo extremist group. Smell, first love of Shaun and a neutral and look almost equally innocent of what happens to your around or the own Combo, destabilizing element and an excuse to show the two sides of the coin.The film progresses in a crescendo soft but steady, adding tension and action to a story that tries to undermine the drama in its first part with situations that lead to laughter, but as it progresses becomes harder and descarnado, wrap in a powerful and dramatic, final climax that leaves the viewer played, without the clear sense of a happy ending but printed a sense of hope to the future of the boy protagonist.A movie with a pace and an evolution perfect, of those who are able to emerge a huge range of conflicting feelings and that leaves a bitter sediment which takes to disappear. |
1,829 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2945 | Juan David | La Caja Kovak | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Small española-estadounidense co-production of science fiction set at present and that without great special effects, ends up being a pretty solid film. | This small española-estadounidense co-production is a decent science fiction film set today, and without the need of great special effects, ends up being a pretty solid film. The film tells the story of David Norton, who travels with his fiancée, to give a lecture on an island; However, the trouble begins when his girlfriend commits suicide inexplicably.Norton confusion increases when he realizes account at the same time on the island have been going a series of unexplained suicides and that his trip to the island is immersed in a plan much more sinister; to discover the truth only count with the help of the only survivor of these suicides which is able to remember because he decided to throw out a window.The film combines conspiracy theories and illegal experiments of the X Files type and history can be seen fairly easily; However never stands out as a gem of the genre and even though the central idea has some traits of originality the execution of the film is fairly conventional but at least serves to have a good time. Three stars. |
1,830 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2210 | Antoni Messa | La ganadora | 3 | 5 | muchocine | A fairly compact portrait of what it means to live with the burden of a dozen of small and in a continuous state of poverty. Pity that in their last final minutes, decided by the usual aftertaste spielgberiano molasses. | Two years later it comes to Spanish screens The Prize Winner of Defiance, Ohio; IE, that here the translators have chosen to simplify the winner, a proper film that partly, and due to its aesthetic and the way to be described, refers directly to the style of Robert Zemeckies, his producer, who initially had in mind to carry out the realization. Several commitments and conflicts of agenda, made that it cede such liability to Jane Anderson, a writer with some previous experience as a Director in the television field.Based on a true story, it tells the vicissitudes that had to suffer the selfless Evelyn Ryan to take forward their ten children and deal, at the same time, with the outbursts of an alcoholic husband and serious psychiatric problems, which, every day, upon returning from his job as a mechanic in a factory, came home without a dollar in the pockets: the miserable pay received invested them in a nearby liquor store.The story begins at the end of the 1950s, an era that seems to motivate the best intentions of Zemeckis. An exquisite production design, the rapid beat of the swing as successful soundtrack, narrative and Visual experiments and a Julianne Moore in one of its best moments of interpretative, mark the fast pace of a melodrama full of humorous touches. The sides before the House of Evelyn Ryan, with the intention of telling the viewer how to remedy economic bumps that became his family, are more ingenious and original. Women, highly skilled for the rhyme, discovered a gold mine thanks to its multiple participations in radio and television advertising competitions. With the help of his mind, paper, pen, envelopes and stamps, he devised a long amount of slogans that, for many years, you were awarded, all kinds of gifts, by companies responsible for products to promote.The presence of Woody Harrelson is one of the determining factors for the success of the film. In it, through a too exaggerated physical characterization, it gives life to Kelly Ryan, the scattered and conflicting family guy. His bipolar temperament means work to the limit, always bordering with the histrionics, but without ever falling into it. Like his character, play with the ends until the last moment, being able to trace his interpretation towards more serene channels.The book The Prize Winner of Defiance, Ohio: How My Mother Raised 10 Kids on 25 Words or Less, written by the sixth sister of numerous offspring of the Ryan, inspired the screenplay of the own Jane Anderson; a script that stands out for alternate with the comedy drama wise way, way with the kitsch of the publicity of the years 50 and 60 and getting a fairly compact portrait of what it means to live with the burden of a dozen of small and in a continuous state of poverty at the same time. Pity that in their last final minutes, decided by the usual aftertaste spielgberiano molasses. But, despite this, it has the merit of not to fall into the easy tear. |
1,831 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1784 | Matías Cobo | El buen pastor | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Beautiful invoice and effective realization, the tape weakens in many parts of its long footage and, at times, borders the soporific in his story about the origin of the powerful CIA. | Some exaggeration in the critical phrases selected for promotions of films is logical. But it caught my attention, by his bombast, one of the employees in the television advertisement of the good Shepherd. "The godfather of spy films", said the sentence awarded to a critical excessively enthusiastic. Because, truth be told, the third tape of Robert De Niro in the direction isn't much less for both. Beautiful invoice and effective realization, the tape weakens in many parts of its long footage and, at times, borders the soporific in his story about the origin of the powerful CIA.The history of this popular spy agency is told through the life of one of its most distinguished founding members: the agent Edward Wilson (played cold and inexpresivamente purposely by Matt Damon). In his youth years, Wilson is described as an outstanding student of strong patriotic convictions. But, as it is involved in the dirty work of the Agency, his life will be marked by continuous resignations: the woman who truly loved, his passion for poetry or to the care and protection of his son.To add some suspense to a story difficult to follow little to not be fairly fresh and neat, the screenplay by Eric Roth (Munich, the dilemma?) proposes a fragmented structure of the story. An inquiry concerning a CIA Bay of pigs fiasco planting an initial intrigue whose outcome will be postponed to the end of the film to tell, in the meantime, the details of how this agency was born and how Wilson was carving is a flawless reputation of cold and effective agent.De Niro directs the Pleiad of great actors of its extensive cast perfectly. William Hurt, Michael Gambon, Joe Pesci, John Turturro, Alec Baldwin or Angelina Jolie, in addition to the own De Niro, interpreted with strength each of their brief roles. Nevertheless, and despite virtues such as this, the tape loses interest in some of his numerous sub-plots. Other Yes substantial to detail how conceived this secret society aimed at directing, which global puppeteer, play the threads of international policy in favour of American interests. I would recommend for their testimonial value about the plumbing work carried out by spies lonely and away altogether of the glamorous image that the film has encouraged many other times. |
1,832 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3810 | Rafa Ferrer | 30 días de oscuridad | 3 | 5 | muchocine | A tape of vampires well constructed (based on a comic), well narrated, and situations fairly well planned, and although they are now seen in the genre in quite a few movies leaves a good taste. | I must admit that although I enjoyed with the film I felt quite disappointed, and it is, I don't know where it appeared that this tape would be made with the same effects and patterns that the excellent "300" and I have to say that perhaps the only resemblance with both is that they are based on a graphic novel, because this has more parallels with "Zombie" "dawn of the dead" or even 'the village of the damned'.In the cast have the deadpan Josh Harnett, that although you love my wife to my it seems that it has the same expressiveness than a chard, and is that it puts the same face when he killed, when someone you know dies, or when anything happens, we have companion to Melissa George, tanned in this kind of films, since not only appears here, but has been in "The abode of fear" supernatural terrors, or plots of "Tourists" organ transplants.Moreover, a tape of vampires well constructed (based on a comic), well narrated, and situations pretty well planned, and although they are now seen in the genre in quite a few movies is a good flavor of mouth, and for a time no smell sequel, that these tapes of terror, as it is known. |
1,833 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3410 | Jack Torrance | Halloween El Origen | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Worse of all the experiment it is passed its ecuador begins to immerse in a tedious dynamic and with little dash, sosa and leadership without passion that make what could have been a good slasher is deadly dull. | The work of John Carpenter being revised by the machinery of hollywood with poor, lazy, mediocre film results. The hope of seeing a personal version of Rob Zombie, that is probably the most influential film of the American master created expectations of witnessing the less curious insights into the myth of Michael Myers. The results are not alarmingly catastrophic, but by no means novel or some interest. They are simply mediocre.Raised as an exploration of evil seen through the origin of psychopathy in a way authentic, Zombie devotes a good portion of the film to explain the children of Michael Myers. The deconstruction of what in the movie by Carpenter worked well in a covert manner isn't as annoying as they could expect the purists of the foundational work of the modern slasher and against all odds, turns into the most interesting part of the final product. The first minutes, who calmly we see who is Michael Myers and observe as the disease of pure evil you has to stop being the same, still evokes in the viewer a fascination and fear by the psychopath, although this time penetrated more psychological and scientific in what was once an almost mystical evocation. This new and fresh vision of the origin ends when Michael escapes and the film ceases to be focused from a standpoint closest to him and the plot turns towards his sister Laurie Strode(un_gimmick_no_presente_en_la_original_Halloween,_surgida_en_la_primera_secuela_deel_film).At that time, the film becomes a proper remake of the original, which could well happen for one sequel. All the Halloween night of the original is told here in a similar way, perhaps with a small plot change here and there. The deaths of the original reproduces plane by plane and the same moments before creating tension, here do not generate any printing. A second part which seeks to operate differently from the original thanks to the development of a first act - prequel that leaves their interesting lines of development in pursuit of play the legendary first movie in a ultramimética way. The worst thing is that the particular style of the director barely makes an appearance in the second half and, except a little more violence and unhealthy sex, not are perceived many resources used, except this time an excessive use of close-ups.Worse of all the experiment it is passed its ecuador begins to immerse in a tedious dynamic and with little dash, sosa and leadership without passion that make what could have been a good slasher is deadly dull. The tension or the horror are replaced by constant sound blows, in the style of production of low estofa horror. A penalty see as a director of undoubted creativity not risks and is limited to trying to address a conventional Slasher. At least, Zombie if he shows his love for the original material and its usual cinephiles makes an appearance. There are many and varied winks to the saga and respect for original material. Rob Zombie Halloween is in part an interesting look to the classic JohnCarpenter but am disappointed as the work of the more capable director of the Devil's rejects. Unfortunately, it won't be to the list of Remakes that equate to the original work as dawn of the dead or that exceed it, as the hills have eyes. Not even come within them are not bad as the Texas Chainsaw Massacre. Halloween is an unnecessary Remake, which could have been better if the same idea of script had been treated by someone more capable, the big problem that drag Rob Zombie is that he can't write. |
1,834 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/403 | Ibán Manzano | United 93 | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Greengrass dissects the film with tension and clinical spirit, so to progress, without losing nerve or falling into morbid, go win in emotion and above all an anguish it seems our. | It is an extreme difficulty to recover through fiction, the story of a tragedy that was narrated in real time by the televisions around the world and whose images have been massively assimilated by our media iconography. Paul Greengrass for their own vision of September 11 reduces the possibilities to matching the only valid, which means the Chronicle of what happened that day, without more implications than the pay homage to the victims; which tells the story of United 93, the only hijacked plane that did not reach its United 93 objetivoDe you could say that in a sense is a species of making off on what CNN could count; why in detriment of the visible, it being perpetrated in the bowels of the bases of operations in the Flight 93. Greengrass dissects the film with tension and clinical spirit, so to progress, without losing nerve or falling into morbid, go win in emotion and above all an anguish it seems our. That is the key of this collective history of anonymous faces called United 93: his honesty, so brutal that surprisingly deep naturalness of his images that would already like to if CNN. |
1,835 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/750 | Oscar Cantero | Saw 3 | 3 | 5 | muchocine | If what you seek is something gloomy and bleak, I recommend that they see the journal of Patricia or any program of these, surely that outweigh, twisted plot of any film of this genre. | Normally, sagas are decreasing in quality as they advance the aftermath. There is precedent for excellent titles, such as the Exorcist, which was degenerating from excellence to ridicule. On the other hand are those second and third parties in which not reflected a difference in quality as large by the simple fact of being grotesque aberrations from the beginning. There are so many examples that I come to my mind that I'll better shut up because if not the limited space available to me would become totally inadequate. Saw is located halfway between the two tracks that I have described, because it has never been a masterpiece but also a pigswill. For those who do not know what is the thing, tell them that the film tells the story of a sadistic murderer butcher of wholesale food market-minded. As usual, the script is repetitive with respect to its predecessors, and the lack of new ideas is masked by increasing the amounts of blood and the volume of the speakers. Saw III is quite closer to gender gore that his first two deliveries, but still has something that makes it entertaining. In my case, I guess I had fun these films because they seem absurd and often cause me a contrary to the intended effect, but what are you going to do. That Yes, Tobin Bell has a face of bad bug (doesn't roles rather than dark characters) that is worth the trouble to see it. On the other hand, if what you seek is something bleak and gloomy, I recommend they see the journal of Patricia or any program of these, surely that outweigh, twisted plot of any film of this genre. And they are also free. |
1,836 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3943 | Tito Chinchan | La telaraña de Carlota | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Film about a spider that weaves to save the life of a small pig. For the public more often, is a nice history of animals and friendship, which surely will please kids. To me has seemed good, but too sentimentaloide. | Director: Gary Winick. duration: 100 minutes.Release date: April 27, 2007.Espectadores: 156.102 of human beings.The use of animals in the movies, especially in roles protagonists always is a little tiresome. Not even the great Babe (film that keeps a huge like this) prevent that more than one rechinen you teeth in the armchair when he sees parlar animals. Personally, although they entertained me these films, I finished call see working animals in the film. My own things.The film is about a girl who saves a small pig of a shaving of axe at the height of the neck. Send this to the farm of his uncle, where he became very quickly (the pig, not the girl) friend of all animals that are there, especially a spider named Charlotte. This makes every effort to save the life of the child, which has its days numbered, showing us how pretty that is friendship. That tender.On the basis that is a film for children, because it seems a nice film. It has a moral ending not see clear, but that leaves a good taste in mouth. Many moments of humor, basically given by the rat and the Ravens (who reminded me many great Tip and Coll), and moments of tenderness for a film for children of the House. My little liked much see as many animals together, though of course not the movie has swallowed it whole.In short, film about a spider that weaves to save the life of a small pig. For the public more often, is a nice history of animals and friendship, which surely will please kids. To me has seemed good, but too sentimentaloide.The end is long, and a tad firecracker, why not say it.kisses. |
1,837 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1525 | Jesus Lens | Pequeña miss sunshine | 3 | 5 | muchocine | ?Little Miss Sunshine? It is a very well-intentioned film as caramel, friendly style, absolutely revolutionary. Conservative? A little, Yes. But I like the aroma of deep, although alternative America and a both freak like that?Can sideways?, for example. | Reading the Ideal of this morning, eve of the Oscar ceremony, a lapidary phrase came to define perfectly to this picture that takes months and months in poster: "The Oscar is big".A truth as a castle. This intimate and friendly "Little Miss Sunshine", yet tender and kind, is not comparable to movies as solvents and scope, "Babel" or "Infiltrators". It is a nice and tender, funny at times and melancholy film on other occasions, but is not, even remotely, this masterpiece, this great movie that must pass to posterity as winner of Oscar Recapitulemos. In a lost village in the United States.UU. a somewhat dysfunctional family must embark on a journey to California time trial to involve the Benjamin in a pathetic child beauty pageant. And there are, in a filthy van, failed father convinced that success can be achieved through a manual of self-help of his invention, the hippie grandfather, drug addict and more vast than panties of esparto, lucid and realistic mother, frustrated intellectual and suicidal uncle and the teenager in permanent rebellion against everything and everyone. And, of course, the girl, ugly and gordita, but with personality and desparpajo. The film tells the relationships between them, you tense sometimes, loving others. And raises a caramel criticism against the tyranny imposed by society towards the thinness and beauty, by ratifying the politically correct speech that beauty is inside and that the really important thing, is to feel good with yourself, ignoring the canons of beauty defended by magazines, fashion, cinema and television.With a Marxist end, the style of the anarchic and surrealists brothers, that leaves you with a pleasant smile on the lips, "Little Miss Sunshine" is a film as well-intentioned as caramel, friendly style, absolutely revolutionary. Conservative? A little, Yes. But I like the aroma of deep, although alternative America and a both geek, as that "between glasses", for example. A movie that we assume will not win the Oscar, but sees with pleasure and sympathy. Neither more nor less. |
1,838 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3871 | José A. Peig | Golpe en la pequeña china | 4 | 5 | muchocine | In short, perfect example of work that - Pulp from its intentions and the idiosyncrasies of their own resources - achieves greater harmony and perfection than other films traditionally (the part of error which this has) located on Mount Olympus. | We often run into the dilemma between choose moviegoers criteria or cinéfagos, define cinema as art or as an object of entertainment as it is and come from where you come. This ends up revealing as an illusion and a sterile debate, because at the end, either from the cinephiles from the cinefagia, any individual possessing the sensitivity and proper training can identify that something abstract possessing all good film: call uniqueness, originality, significance of narration, packaging, coherence between the intended purpose and end result. and vice versa, comes from where it comes, also will be able to identify products that lack altogether of singularity. Big trouble in little china (1986) can be considered as a jewel for the palate cinéfago that, very often, will be despised by movie fan claim imposed by an alleged act of good taste, dispatching her under descriptions condescending when it comes to evaluate it, that this baby of the tradition of series b and z, aesthetics and the narrative Pulp. It is not only a film that, since a successful informal tone, get an honest entertainment, but that we are talking about one of the most genuine films that have been seen in the past three decades. Directed by John Carpenter, presents a story of a rayana simplicity with simple (it is always important not to confuse simplicity with simplicity, but in this case we are talking about an archetypal fairy tale in its foundations that follows a progression of mischievous demystification of clichés) which brings together with an unusual desparpajo elements of myth and the Eastern magic, the mythology of the westernPolice film and the martial arts film, all this subject to an exhibition of the story who walks among the uncanny and the comic, being both a zany adventure in an underworld of passageways, hidden cameras, wizards and creatures of the underworld as a comedy of clear parodic intentions, especially in the creation of the antihero Jak Burton, parody to the clichés and the iconography of references on which it is based. The narrative impetus that animates, is a remarkable example of action cinema as soon as he squeezed the possibilities of its theme and the means used without leaving the pot that was conceived, i.e. It provides a repertoire of magic kinematic respecting the laws of the spoof universe containing those characters whose gestures - along with the burlesque tone in dialogues - define the unique type of possible look that could be applied effectively an absurd history altogether, which is not easy. Develop a versatile and creation of great expressive qualities on the basis of an agglomerate of clichés of the comic book, film and television - and concocting various subgenres - is a feat. Jak Burton (Kurt Russell) is emerged from the mythology of the western anti-hero, a cowboy mounted on his truck, encroached in the rescue of the girl, which will star in a scene very little seen in the history of cinema (deconstruction of one of the greatest places common and repeated endlessly) when, in the penultimate sequence, refuses to give the kiss of farewell to the girl in the film.In short, perfect example of work that - Pulp from its intentions and the idiosyncrasies of their own resources - achieves greater harmony and perfection than other films traditionally (the part of error which this has) located in the Olympus of the classics of the seventh art, as for example The Party, recently evaluated in this booklet. |
1,839 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/43 | Iñigo | Saraband | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Dancing to the sound of Bergman | To the skeptics that we believed that the film was losing all degree of humanity and was sinking into utter vulgarity, still Ingmar Bergman. We still have his work confessions, of fleeting light between so much darkness, heavenly music that requires a (forced) reflection prior to viewing. Our pleasure, in any case, be brief. Bergman, in his own words, here signed his film Testament. The testament of a genius. As if it were a preparation for his films, the acolytes found in his film more than sense and sensibility can not stop launch prayers so that this does not happen. It is the only thing we have left to satisfy our spiritual concerns. But, to his 87 years, as much as it could extend his legacy, we must kneel with the reality. Many do not want to participate in the signing of the testament of Bergman, but it is true that increasingly are is depleted, after disappearing from the celluloid with "Fanny and Alexander" in 1982. In fact, "Saraband" in the beginning was only a proposed television in Sweden. But, on its own initiative, is has been premiering gradually throughout the world. With almost all of his life devoted to the film, Bergman is still the Bergman always. And it is a pleasure to be able to confirm this. But "Saraband" stays there. It goes beyond, if that is possible. Here is the spirit of the master, culminating its zenith, reaching a rank of unspeakable maturity. It is a great example of how to end a career, how to reach the top without changing or force an iota of his personality. What other "dying" directors decline, in Bergman is maturity. And they may not observe his work rather than envy and cleanliness. This is what distinguishes the art of purely aesthetic. "Saraband", whose production dates back to 2003, but its premiere us fails so far to our country, is, above all, cinema of confessions. Here, the visual power of films such as "Wild strawberries" goes into potential of dialogues and people. Bergman immerses your analytical camera to hidden most of us, until you reach a closeness that goes beyond the impossible in the purely material. The camera is approaching our faces, to decipher them, to scrutinize them and continue getting to penetrate the eyes. His emotional, serene and leisurely, analysis is so human that, occasionally, it goes beyond the unbearable. Its density, its simplicity at the same time, does not lead to breathing. On many occasions we are so participants of the torment of their characters that we cannot maintain the type. For this reason, "Saraband" is not a film that we pull the couch kicking. It is not a film that really us. "Saraband", as entire Filmography of the director, generates a feeling of helplessness so strange that it causes that, at times, our eyes flee from the screen and seeking refuge. It is more violent, in this regard, that any film that is meant to be using other methods. The theologian born in Upsala, gets full (no possible return) in the turbulence of a family is any grubbing-up sense of our more full of humanity nature Genesis. From the cruel and deranged hatred (that seems to have no sense at times) until the love of more rampant, going through the agony, the anguish and sacrifice. A sacrifice that detailed the unexplained family ties which unite and generate all kinds of reactions, but that gives us the pleasure of knowing that we are the same person, a same blood. same pain. It is always the desconhort understanding our past, know our roots, and feel that we are, inexorably, part of them. Our life will seek new paths, away or not our family, but that invisible Union we grab and doesn't let us escape is inevitable. Bergman, "Saraband" retrieves the characters of "Secrets of a marriage", but in a different environment. While the second focuses on a topic in particular, in his last film, Bergman, speaks to us of everything and nothing in particular. It portrays the obsessions of his lifetime of film, as the ravings about the death, strained family relations which arouse more profound and irrational hatred and heartfelt love (among which there paradox, however much it may seem), convictions, deep belief and the elitist musicality surrounded by the person of Freud or Strindberg. And here we have everything. And it scares much the follower of the Bergman film, it has an air of vital and intimate testimony that makes arise many (and obvious) things. As if it were a theatre or a piece of camera work, Bergman builds, thus a story which is structured into 10 pieces, as well as a prologue and an epilogue. This story follows the beat of a music that hides the sins in the most intimate of us and manages to corrupt us until the selfishness and intolerance, without addressing to confessions and emanating from wounds not healed from the past. The sublime music of Bach and Brahms, at certain times and intentionally reaches rumbling until the pain in our bodies. It is not more than a metaphor plotted by the genius to reinforce the sense that aims to acquire the narration. Therefore, without going any further, the title ("saraband") is related to times of the Bach suites, composed for cello and normally done as a couple. As the intense talks of the protagonists, who engaged in them two by two acquiring a musicality that establishes the resemblance between the musical metaphor and the emotional situation. As a metaphorical point of Union and family destruction (and music, is to continue with the structure of the work), have to Anna, the mother, the wife, the "daughter". She (this actress is, neither more nor less, of a wife of the own Bergman, who died of cancer) is the point of family coherence, which if it collapses and disappears, will cause the loss of stability in this core. Occurs the amputation of a member of the family, and the consequences dot so far as to the own Marianne, as we got to see in this beautiful and poetic epilogue. So, we have a range of subjects ranging from the religiosity of the music and some of their images (despite focusing mostly on dialogues and people, there is a scene that shows a nearly utopian and Heavenly beauty) to the successful treatment of the aging or sordid torment that accompanies the characters and goes further than the personal sufferinguntil spiritual torment and, in essence, metaphysical. Like them, we will feel anguish, but because of the sacrifice we will achieve the beauty of the company, the rubbing of skin that prevents that the pain is something unbearable, and the conviertirá in a raw, but pleasant emotions obtaining. Because this is how we are human beings. Paradoxical? Incomprehensible? Maybe too easy and primary. As those families that, after the loss, dot the surroundings with hatred, claiming thirst for revenge and demonstrating an intolerance and selfishness unexplained. But, at the same time, loving. For this reason, nothing makes us think that, as some cited, Bergman was present something more negative than usual. Is he himself. It is maturity. With this consistency overwhelming and full of sincerity in the totality of his work, and with it, his hand, as it could not be otherwise, farewell also. It is Bergman. We ourselves. With our concerns and our vital dalliances. And that surprises every day in its form of film-making (art): possesses a domain to bring the catharsis of the moments of the talks beyond doubt, without giving an opinion or making judgment about it, simply by pointing and introducing, as do the great artisans with existential concerns (see Kieslowski). And it shows pain that exists inside the storm of emotions, the stream of unexplained sensations, confusion and desire, the inherent power of pride. and beauty, although us escape and hide in the most recondite areas of our being. It need to know find her, that it sometimes seems not to want to be found. Thus bids farewell to Ingmar Bergman. As always. At the top, and well over his "opponents" film. He says goodbye with a sublime mixture between the power of theatre and cinema, focusing on dialogues and actors (sovereign work by Liv Ullmann and Erland Josephson) to deal with all the weight of the work. If "Saraband" isn't a masterpiece (adding what it represents and is at the same time) or rights not the unmitigated 10, it is not easy to say what other movie could deserve it. His finest plans, their anthology confessions. the film is simple development, but it is so complex and deep, contains both vital sense inside that, at times, will escape to the understanding of many. It requires an "extra" effort and preparation and knowledge of the filmmaker. Perhaps, therefore, the Viewer is not ready feel how weigh you the dialogues, you will notice uncomfortable, dazed and anxious before its density. But these are the effects of knowing to Bergman. Although for them it is already too late. Or not. So are things. "Saraband": the testament of Bergman, not to hear or read between lovers who have been persecuted during his career the figure of the genius. But a testament has pages. And these pages can be read over and over again throughout life. And with them learn and, increasingly, discover new things. As much as Bergman disappears, as reflected at the beginning of the critique, its footprint it will never. There is his timeless work for souls in search of course. A course that, despite everything, are unaware. We lost to Kieslowski, we lost to Dreyer. Now. He is about to lose the other with the disappearance of Bergman. Despite the greatest of everything, those pages are indelible. They are pages of a genius. And do never forget. Forever, Ingmar Bergman. |
1,840 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1750 | Jose Contreras | Descubriendo a los Robinsons | 3 | 5 | muchocine | It is true that the end works, but the film is not round, because with less travel time and less fantastic worlds could have done just as happy feeling. | In American culture, the left is not a social in the European phenomenon. The left is so individualistic, heroíca and promoter of individual effort as the right. The difference between one and another to my seems me facade, nothing more. I don't understand why Tim Robins complains of having given the hand to the Mayor of Madrid. I do not understand what the difference separating them.The American left is Capra, crazy family "Live as you want", families alternative of Katherine Hepburn, as the aunt of Connecticut in "Bringing up baby", the Royal family of the Hepburn, the family of the Focker in "The parents". And the Robinson family. "The American left seems to be let children is no longer the soup without test it, or that practice ballet on the dining room table, while the grandfather try an invention that is useless in the kitchen.""Discovering the Robinson" not so much of the revisitación to a coiled progressive family in the 1930s, as a travel in time to the Charles Dickens and his Christmas Carol, or remastering "Click", or many other time travel. Terminator, the time in their hands, journey into the future, twelve monkeys, the planet of the apes, the machine of the time, Frequency and the sound of Thunder, first. I leave an aside to that surprised me most and less successful was: "The butterfly effect", where each change the protagonist makes in the past leads to a completely unexpected present.Engines of Disney's return, finally, to use the imagination as fuel.But I like his prose, I do not share the enthusiasm of Jordi Costa. Time travel is not a display of imagination, today is a well-trodden path. The collection of quirky characters not looks if they are not part of a gear that faces them and makes out sparks in front of us. Moral choices: looking forward, or live on the rancor, are not vulgar, but they would also fit in a self-help book.It is true that the end works. It will no doubt thrill. Will it make think if happiness is something that one left in some corner of the past or something that one has to Curran is. But the film is not round, because with less travel time and less fantastic worlds could have done just as happy feeling. |
1,841 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3199 | Ana Belén Pacheco | El último beso | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Prejudices to see Italian cinema and the fact become popular after the remake can do you some damage although it may be a good time to give you the opportunity to also. | We are older. Carlo does not want to assume it, and is a shame because his girlfriend that he hoped a child has quite clear, also it seems to see the light of his mother who decides to finally take the step of leaving her husband. But Carlo still decide with their increasingly large Peter Pan complex. Just have to see to his friends: a fairly bitter married by his wife and his son, an addict to the casual encounters and the last is obsessed with his ex who hates his job and whose father is on the deathbed. At the wedding of another friend realize their problems and some events just detonating their need for change in the form of a lovely Lolita teen love, choosing a trip into the unknown together with the friends of a lifetime or make decisions that can affect an entire family. Some discover that they want to remain kids, others decide that they were not ready to stop being so although they thought and any that will always remain so. I could not tell which of the characters that populate L'Ultimo Bacio is that has come over me. Perhaps for that share the age and the spirit of these friends there is a seamless connection with most of the feelings and fears reflected in the tape. The script is simply brilliant talks, even the most dramatic, rozan perfection. What is normal in a movie with such choral claim makes one of the cores of the story more boring or simply less interesting but this stone is saved to perfection. When it seems that we sobreponemos the visual impact of a scene (there really are dramatic) or a decision of a character that is waiting around the corner.The actors reach a State of absolute grace. The scenes with discussions (believe me there are a few) they deserve to see and would probably not work so effectively if not thanks to them. The youngster Martina Stella and Stefano Accorsi emit a chemical that is appreciated on the screen. Do not fool you, this is a drama film with a romantic touch, there is no rest for the humor because we all know that in some ways love is a drama or would not be realistic or interesting.Impressive the end, an outcome that will delight any lover of good cinema with a magnificent reflections that obviously were not respected in its American remake so if you've seen the latter forget everything and view this jewel of contemporary cinema without prejudice and I assure you that there will be two hours well invested.DATA of the película:Estrenada in Spain (therefore you can find easily in Spanish) Spain release: 2 July later 2004Remake of the American The Last Kiss |
1,842 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4356 | Iñaki Bilbao | Odio en las aulas | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Pretty mediocre film, is supposed social complaint, also supposed, was created to contribute to peace in the institutes where there was mixture of races and existián problems for such reason. | "A Professor of black literature must return to the village where he grew up to take charge of the classrooms of a conflictive Institute where always there has been only student/ACE of their same race." However, now, for reasons of transfers and records, a group of alumo of white must study there. This, of course, thought will create various conflicts, requiring, for not to be more than someone with experience and has worked with all kinds of students."Despite his efforts, every day will be muddling atmosphere, with eventually physical and verbal disputes".Pretty mediocre film, is supposed social complaint, also supposed, was created to contribute to peace in the institutes where there was mixture of races and existián problems for such reason.Therefore, after seeing her, firmly believe that failed its purposes, it is a soft movie, something infuriating in his inanity, almost nothing deep and that, even if it is full (I think) of good feelings, the truth is only seeking economic success, I do not know if it failed.Everything is full of clichés, silly supposedly intelligent dialogues, with irregular performances (well Jeff Bridges in one of her first major roles) and a use of music, which is the best of the tape.The rest is something bobalicón how such products be tomárselso seriously and not stay in Midlands which only impoverish the final set, as it is the case. A final outcome poor, moderately entertaining, rather tedious and with good photography, that Yes.But da creeps see the "deep" pedagogical value of the film, especially in the episode of the boy "of color" who, despite the fact that it is already in the last year of the Institute, just read. The teacher, knowing that the guy likes the magazines "green" gift you with reading a good novel with accent sexual and erotic. The boy, to what it reads (rather squeal) takes interest and do not know me, but almost one or two days at most, read faster and understand everything. We must implement this subtle method in all schools in the whole world.And it is also nice that tells them at one point to his friends the black head of the AUL: "-I, as a black child had white friends." "Now that I'm"of color", already I have none".Finally, intelligence in the script. |
1,843 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1328 | Tito Chinchan | Noviembre | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Film of high level of Spanish film that shows that a good idea can have a low budget. Social criticism that makes us feel very alive and shows us a world unknown to most. Of essential impossible and utopian utopias. | The first time I had contact with November was thanks to the video store in the neighborhood, dead and buried long ago. It was one of those tapes that you see for your own quota of patriotic cinema, that you take by not find anything you want less, or that you have a silly day and you want to redeem the world. Now her I longer have, given that it left me very perplexed, I needed to have it. As an anecdote, not I realized that was a documentary invented until near the end (neurons, listen to me!).The film is Alfredo (Oscar Jaenada) which is a murcian young arrived in Madrid to study fine arts. Shortly after being in school, is giving account there will not learn what the want. He is interested in another type of art, an art that really reaches the public, away from commercial, that you you can find anywhere, anytime. Ultimately, a free art, subject only to the creative abilities of the authors. Little by little, his idea is gaining momentum to form a theater group that strangest and most original film call November. what. How to burn it is documentary, although what counts is invented. A bold person would realize nothing more start, given that the dates do not agree, to me it took me nearly ninety minutes. The argument is very original, showing some utopian ideas carried the end getting a despiertar of the senses. The cast of actors say he is taken, on the one hand consecrated which are the documentary and the other young people, who are curious to see the evolution that have followed. On the negative side, it has a small loss of pace, perhaps caused by an excess of representations.In short, film of high level of Spanish film that shows that a good idea can have a low budget. Social criticism that makes us feel very alive and shows us a world unknown to most. Of essential impossible and utopian utopias. |
1,844 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/131 | Alvaro Oliva | El caso Slevin | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Good movie with an interesting script | The Slevin case is presented as an interesting proposal in the current film scene, which has a good cast and a very appealing trailer. Unlike other productions, the trailer doesn't fool us and offers about 100 minutes of fun and entertainment. With an aftertaste to Hitchcock and his "with death on the heels" Paul McGuigan presents the avatars should suffer Josh Hartnett to be confused with another person. The interesting thing about the film is that at the beginning or herself is taken seriously, which leaves us freedom to take us with humor and watch situations which otherwise would seem unreal to us and even a little ridiculous.The casting that offers us this thriller, because we identify and sympathise with the characters, which facilitates the way to let us go by the events Jasón Smilovic has written is a great success. The pace and the Assembly do the rest, and a very right way, that we are not losing in the explanations that give, or in presentations of the characters, which in others such as the recent Syriana, if it happened.We must praise the script has a few very successful and effective changes, and why not we become artificial, which also facilitates the work of the actors, as in Josh Hartnett and mildly in Bruce Willis.Sir Ben Kingsley, Morgan Freeman and Lucy Liu are the trio of ACEs that accompanies the aforementioned coupleplaying the two Mafia bosses and the neighbor of the protagonist respectively. Ultimately the case Slevin is a successful film which has an interesting script, that can make us remember the usual suspects, and will delight those fans to action cinema, with several characters, in which van giving clues, timeless resolutions, and that they admire to Tarantino, Rodriguez and Doug Liman. |
1,845 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3276 | Andrés Pons | Mesías del mal | 3 | 5 | muchocine | That nobody wait see guts high, here the shots go in other directions, it is a terror that moves more between psychological. The anguish is transmitted in every scene with great mastery. | A couple of authors returned to join some time later to pegár is her style with HOWARD a new hero. The film was directed by some interpreters of serie b more Psicotónica of the time.MARIANNA HILL "Cage homeless" or ANITA FORD "the invasion of the bee Queen". We have a really estimable film with an absorbent soundtrack, very grim picture that provides high efficiency in a paused but perfectly developed with great violence underground footage.That nobody wait see guts high, here the shots go in other directions, it is a terror that moves more between psychological. The anguish is transmitted in every scene with great mastery.The ZOMBIES are different, already in the 1970s us is athletic, very fast, really less monstrous appearance but it is transmitted at the same time less likely to deal with them which leads the characters to feel trapped with almost similar intelligence beings.A film that attacks the subgenus from a perspective very different to the usual, auque their slowness sometimes can be exasperating. A 7. |
1,846 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1164 | Oscar Cantero | Sospecha | 3 | 5 | muchocine | One of the less fortunate of Hitchcock, which does save the mediocrity of the genius of Cary Grant and Joan Fontaine charming. | It has always been said that there were two Hitchcocks: the first, his stage British, before crossing the pond; and the second, which for years obviously worked on then glittering Mecca of celluloid.Known by his predilection for certain actresses that reached obsessing, is certainly his mastery in the recreation of environments and suspense-laden environments what led him to going down in history with the category of myth.Suspicion is not precisely one of their more fortunate titles. Having that having seen a colored version (seemed at times scenes from a video game), has not helped, but the copy that has fallen into my hands had this built-in "gift", and as much as I rummaged in the options of the DVD, there was no way to remove the dye.Basically, it is a film that has two distinct parts. The first is more comedy anything else, that simply shows the friendly face of a vividor, a viva la vida of those remaining at the expense of giving saber and others, using a good last name and presence more than correct. Later, begins to glimpse another different person behind under the guise of frivolity, and that generates mistrust in his own wife, to the point of making her fear for his life. Without being, as I said before, one of their more fortunate works, highlights the magnificent interpretation of the always fabulous Cary Grant and the tremendously emotional Joan Fontaine, specialist in giving his characters of enormous emotional and expressive intensity. Joan received an Academy Award for his work on suspicion in 1941, defeating her sister curiously also well-known actress Olivia de Havilland, who chose the award for her performance in "if not amaneciera". This led to a feud between the two which lasted many years. Joan Fontaine, who currently lives completely withdrawn from public life (has more than 90 years) is one of my favorite actresses, and in my opinion has always enjoyed recognition much less than it deserves. Although this is another percale arena.Returning to the film, drew attention to the somewhat strange combination of more or less solemn scenes with others of a lighter nature, or the incursion of certain jokes not entirely fortunate at inopportune moments. Also it collides a bit alternating between dialogues vibrant, fast, and full of energy with each other excessively muffled.Producer beat Hitchcock a particular ending I not desvelaré for those who have not seen the film, which was far from which the director wished to give to the film, as confessed the director himself years later another genius from the screen, Truffaut.Reitero is not their more fortunate titles, but still worth seeing it, and simply view on screen its protagonists is a delight for the Viewer. |
1,847 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/980 | Bloody Will | Eragon | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Eragon is a real disaster. A genuine heresy committed against the original by Paolini. | Apparently, "Eragon" can raise already as a genuine heresy committed against the original written by the young Italian Christopher Paolini. The trilogy of "The legacy", whose first book is who now jump to screens with a worthy of a Harry Potter marketing, is called upon to deal with the Christmas calendar of Hollywood industry during the next four years, and will have much to see their numbers at the box office this weekend, or what is the same: your support, and now I see no just happy?The truth is that, in terms of plot development, "Eragon" is a real disaster. During the first half hour everything is abrupt and without hardly any explanation. Scenes can basically take two seconds, from one to another with a real rush to remove the run-up to the history in the middle and go directly to what you want to the púlbico: battles and more battles. This has a direct consequence: not connect with anything. The magical ability of the protagonist appears without ton nor are there any initiation. There are characters that run more on foot a Dragon flying and ending situations of real danger practically out the door without any opposition. Crazy.I must confess that the beginning of all this mythology is pure "Star Wars": Eragon lives on a farm with his uncle, after there being left by their parents, and before an unexpected destination, you will find his mentor, which shall guide you toward the rebels and will start it in their powers and the future that awaits you. Not you sorprendáis because finally Galbatorix, the villain in the film says "Eragon, I am your father"?.Drinking clearly part of the universe created by Tolkien (spoken in the film of Elves and dwarves), aesthetics comes to be the same, and that is a handicap for the film. With the exception of that home as Luke Skywalker, the rest of the story returns to be about tyrants, junior sorcerers and rebels against the dictatorship. With a fregadito there and there, everything is converted into a product halfway entertains, but not dazzles. Of course, not look the film through the eyes of a reader predisposed to analyze the adaptation, as I have not read the original work, and from this distance I can appreciate that, in order to convert the legend of Eragon in a commercial product, its leaders have extracted passages with more action, perdiéndo in the way other aspects that would have easily been able to remedy if not for the regrettable length of the film: 1 hour and a half in which to condense all the beast.Perhaps the best choice made by the director and his team of casting lead actor himself. The boy does not hurt, and is at least not as clueless as our friend Daniel "Potter" Ratcliffe in her first film. From there to make it an Elijah Wood is a stretch. Jeremy Irons in his line, passing the procedure, although much is far from the English actorazo that caught our attention in the 1990s. I have lost the respect and that is fatal to my opinion. At least most is who captures screen time, that to John Malkovich we nor smell and Djimon Hounson appears just 2 minutes. Book them all for the sequel. Mention aside for Robert Carlyle, in his role as the villain Durse is the only view consistent with the whole of the film.And could give the approved the film for special effects, specifically the Dragon had been the novamás. Well nor by those that Sephira, the Dragon in the film has enjoyed a CGI of all one hundred. With the time that has elapsed since "DragonHeart" or "Harry Potter and the Goblet of fire", and I think their dragons better made than the main claim of "Eragon". It will evolve in Pokemon blue?, already we will check.Ultimately, poor management, dialogos enclichados, a mediocre costumes and some special effects in the middle of a direct to DVD movie. "Eragon" has been sold as the event of the year and is everything but the future fantastic trilogy. 9 To 13 years preteens will like, but to decepeción largest to seek an Uruk-Hai and encontarme with soldiers with mask. To pass the time, but by God, not us engañéis with comparisons, which in the end are not odious: are aniquiladoras. |
1,848 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2387 | Alex Largo | La fuente de la vida | 4 | 5 | muchocine | As I said, "The source of life" has a very good script, tells us an idea, with three stories. But the most important of these 3 stories is what you tell us, and tell them us how. | Almost that, by chance, I learned that one such film called "The Fountain", of a such Darro Aruofski (that is how he called I before it), was a subject that always caught the attention. Eternal life.This was the case, and, searching, I found the soundtrack (a genuine wonder) and the date of the premiere in Spain: 27/4/07. Sincerely saw the film the day of the premiere, then, you girls wonder: why has taken both to publish criticism?The truth is that for reasons beyond me not I have done until now, a real shame.But that does not matter we now (or never), so. Let's talk about the film.To begin with I would like to express my displeasure at the fact that in a room for 400 people, at a meeting at 6: 30 pm, we were only 10 people. There is who might think that the film is bad (as the criticism says), but I tell you is not, for nothing, bad.You can call it rare, strange, paranoid. but no one in their right mind can say that the film is bad. Even so, critics of Venice were the boots with the film.Nothing further from the truth. "The source of life" can boast of a spotless script, a few actors to carry out their duties more than and with apotheosis special effects and of biblical proportions that have been made with a derisory budget for a film of this kind.It is true that this film is for a select audience, to an audience willing to think, to compare, and to enjoy a film that requires the viewer gets into it to be a film capitalized. And, unfortunately, this is something that the people are not willing to do, the engage that way in a film. Phew. and think at the same time. It is a pity that we have used to sit in the armchair and see.As I said, "The source of life" has a very good script, tells us an idea, with three stories (which although are performed by the same actors), have almost no connection among themselves (except the visions of Tommy by the road to Xibalba tree). But the most important of these 3 stories is what you tell us, and tell them us how. I won't say anything more than the script for not disclosing important data.One of the strengths of the film assets, is the work of its director, Darren Aronofsky. "Inspired" is the word that defines the work of Darren after cameras. Man seen desire and enthusiasm making a film that has sunk into the more honda miseries on box office refers.As I said the actors are great. Now that the distribution top it a fantastic Hugh Jackman and an immeasurable Rachel Weisz, magnificent after winning that well-deserved Oscar for "The faithful gardener".As for the soundtrack. as I said at the time. That's great. And most brilliant even in the film, where it acts as a thread and merged with the images of an enviable way Aronofsky. It is also an essential for special effects accompanying. And both elements give the film a Bíblico-Paranoico air that makes you stay in the armchair of foolishly cinema.To give you an idea, since the first sentence appears on screen (a quote from Genesis), the film served on my what I call "the effect Palau".I am going to explain what this "Bucket effect": imagine someone going, grab a shovel and you loose a host in the face that leaves you lost fools. So that, that you stay as a fool.As I said, the movie leaves you as a fool, is something very curious. It is as if you could not clear the eyes of the screen, as if telling you the movie (a journey to a dying star, death bereavement, the search for the Temple of the tree of life.) you would be turning to you. As if all of this had a sense (the funny thing is that you have, but you have to stop you to think). |
1,849 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4177 | Kiko de España | Kiss kiss bang bang | 5 | 5 | muchocine | The metacine is something very funny. An example of a modern masterpiece. Noir comedy of the good and partner for the story. | Kiss kiss bang bang, written and directed by Shane Black, is the thriller faster, fun and original of recent years.In fact, I think that it is the best thriller I've seen from A "Fargo" sausage got actor, (Downey Jr.) in a boot that is enjoyed, he gets into a detective mess that accompanies a detective gay (Kilmer) and a friend of childhood (Michelle Monaghan) that is reunited in the city of dreams.The director is responsible for the scripts of the series "Lethal weapon" or "The last boy scout" (also a movie of our childhood, "An amazing gang" and "The last action hero"), and I have to take my hat at the outcome of his directorial debut, of master results.Photography is excellent, the score is pure noir, the pace is wild and the players are simply sublime.Kilmer is not a great actor, but here enjoying each one of his (ingenious) lines of dialogue, and it shows.Special mention for an extraordinary (as usual) Robert Downey Jr., showing that it is an ACTORAZO the best role of her career. (Yes, better than "Chaplin")I am sure that if the direction drive conducted by Jonze, Gondry or some other modernillo are her qualify masterpiece, because it plays with fiction and reality during all the footage to finish in an autoparódico (spectacular) climax that leaves in its infancy to the of the (notable) masterpiece of Spike Jonze, "Adaptation" absolutely compulsory for all the stragglers. |
1,850 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1842 | Jeremy Fox | Juegos secretos | 2 | 5 | muchocine | It starts in a promising way, featuring the characters quickly and easily, although from the middle of the tape begins to deflate it. | There are films whose formal wrapper yells at the spectator so firmly that are, it is easy to be fooled by them and conclude that, indeed, they are great films both good and deep. "Games secrets" (Little Children), the new work by Todd Field after "In the room", I think is one of those movies.It has the film, the story of a group of people whose lives intersect in parks, swimming pools and streets of their small community. A bored mother (Kate Winslet) befriends a father (Patrick Wilson) who stays at home while his wife (Jennifer Connelly) is out working. On the other hand, Larry (Noah Emmerich), begins to worry by the presence in the neighborhood of a pedophile (James Earle Haley) fresh out of prison.One of the elements used by the film to be "deep" is the continuous comparison with "Madame Bovary". It is not necessary to comment on the enormous differences between the society of the 19th century and the current, still not as big as I would like, and which override entirely the simile. The author of the screenplay, in fact, is aware of these differences and invents an unfortunate argument to "justify" the infidelity of the character of Kate Winslet. It is believed that otherwise it would not be justifiable? Was it necessary? If the work is intended to be a critique of the society why gives the character an excuse so simplistic?In fact, the film exudes a reactionary whiff that cries out to heaven. I am in favour of not judging a film by their ideology and I do not but I would like to draw attention to the fact that, if I have noticed that detail is because the film not hooked me. To give a radical example I will say that when I see "Triumph of the will" of Leni Riefenstahl I forget Nazism, moved by the beauty of the images.But I don't want you to think there is no anything good in the film or has horrified because it is not. It starts in a promising way, featuring the characters quickly and easily, although from the middle of the tape begins to deflate it.It is also true that the actors are fine, but I think that he has exaggerated the quality of the interpretation of Kate Winslet (great actress that is at your level but without fanfare) and underestimated that of Jennifer Connelly, for example, in the scene of dinner (sorry for the cacophony) gives a lesson of how look in the film.James Earle Haley make up a disturbed able to equal parts pity and fear and that stars one of the best scenes deserves special mention. Including a great tribute to "Shark" that is very cleverly embedded in history will remain in my memory. If you have seen the film perhaps you adivinéis that scene I mean.As I say, the story will deflate gradually until reaching a final really strange in which characters make stupid decisions with the sole purpose of reaching the point desired by the director and screenwriter. I could understand it and it would almost make sense, if it were a ruthless critique of American society, but it is that this criticism is not for me, visible at any time. Sometimes the intuímos and I think that, as we want to see it, we almost got it to see but we cannot do it without fill the gaps with elements of our invention. I do not believe that to be the correct way to deal with a film.I cannot comment on the painful translation of the title of the film in Spain. "Secret games" is clearly designed to attract the public to the Chambers in the hope of encountering an erotic thriller or something. In fact, some friends asked me for the film ran panicking as soon as I told them it was a drama.The original title, "Little Children", gives much more sense to everything that happens. Because that is what all the characters are for director and screenwriter: toddlers unable to be clear about what they want, fight for it, become responsible, mature, treat her mental illness, etc? "A pity that the intended message does not end to the viewer or that intend to use for this script tricks that rub the ridiculous.""Secret games" is thus halfway of the fantastic film which could be but without either falling into mediocrity. Its critical impact seems to me, in any case, excessive and passing.Moonfleet.es rating: 5 out of 10 |
1,851 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3731 | Andrés Pons | Kombate Brutal | 4 | 5 | muchocine | We breathe the good vibes and the desire to have fun in the footage. | One of the producers more outstanding and certainly politically incorrect in the amateur scene with titles as prominent as the devil or zombie Real clockwise to stir among many others.These natives return to demonstrate his great sense of humor in a film that parodies with great showcasing the old adventures of karate and the famous tournaments, with a sense of rhythm that no lapses in no time, even the technical effects are really well made for the budget they handle, you can breathe the good vibes and the desire to have fun in the footage.A wave of laughter from start to finish that makes me admire them a little more in the line of death in Torremolinos karate but superior. |
1,852 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2765 | Francisco Bellón | La Carta Esférica | 2 | 5 | muchocine | The spherical letter is a film of intrigue that aims to provide lot of tension and excitement and at the end does not comply with what was promised. | There are genres which the public seems only associated to a particular cinematography, commonly the American. Genres such as musicals, war movies, film adventures or the surpluses of time seems that in the eyes of the spectators can only be in Hollywood. Why not American films of this type almost never connected with the respectable by very well made they are.Same thing happens to the intrigue and mystery film although ironies of fate, this has been a genre rather cultivated in Spanish film, which still gives excellent fruits such as La Caja 507 or X. Now comes the letter spherical, adaptation of the novel by Arturo Pérez-Reverte, one of the authors whose works more often have been reflected on the big screen. The film tells a story in which a sailor banished from the sea will be forced to help a mysterious woman in his search of a sunken ship that holds many secrets. The spherical letter means return to the film by Imanol Uribe, one of the most valued filmmakers of the last decades. The film has a good boot, which seduces and captivates the Viewer, but little by little the plot loses tension and intensity. After his good start, the tape is unable to maintain the interest of the public, and gradually becomes monotonous and predictable. The characters become flat, without any kind of development, in particular the interpreted by Aitana Sánchez-Gijón, that pretends to be a woman fatal but the attempt loses credibility as the minutes elapse. Own work of the actress does not help to give strength to the character, which ends up sinking hopelessly. For its part, Carmelo Gomez ends nor give her character of the necessary force, although broadly complies with its work. Elements to emphasize there are few, but above all it stands out Javier Aguirresarobe.La letter spherical photography is a film of intrigue that aims to provide lot of tension and excitement at the end does not comply with what was promised. The end result is not bad but is not what could have given of it in other hands. |
1,853 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2094 | Rafa Ferrer | Piratas del Caribe: En el Fin del Mundo | 2 | 5 | muchocine | A close regular for a saga (palomitera) quite decent. | It is curious as Disney has been able to get the most juice from an attraction (quite funny, by the way) of their theme parks, perhaps the surprise of a couple of seasons, and as it happened to be a film to a series or franchise, as you see, the final act of the film where Johnny Depp has gone back to being an actor and not the comparsa tragi-comic by my beloved Tim Burton.Gore Verbinski composed heretrying to close slowly but surely (nearly 2: 30 footage) all frames that opened in previous tapes, alluding to all the previous films and recreating flat impossible, thanks to the excellent industries Light & Magic.Depp magic in his line, although this time the illustrious Captain Sparrow is more payasete than the other 2 films, the first was a strangely effeminate Captain curious, and in the second a sort of hero of action on this, however is a mere excuse and comic comparsa of the Disney film, Keira Knightley in addition, seems taken from an advertisement for Revlon, and while all the characters look look at time and dirty teeth, Keira looks always a careful look and white teeth like pearls is the only one who at the time of the pirates discovered the toothpaste?To Orlando Bloom every day stand you less, and while in "The Lord of the rings" I fell (more for a nice literary toward his character, by the interpretation of the actor itself) quite nice, every movie I've seen, with their presence makes more a pretty face than an actor with a bit of packaging, so dramatic, as comic and it is that refusal to continue the franchise, he attempts to (unsuccessfully) give it some importance to his simple character.Bill Nighy, in promotional interviews highlighted always tremendous envy gave his filming companions, by costumes makeup, while he did dressed in a strange grey pajamas, that the people of ILM is encarba turn into Davy Jones, here it seems that he has finally been able to compensate in such fact, and even for a few minutes can see you characterized as "the other" Davy Jones.Si well the story is entertainingat times can be quite liosa, since to shelve (at a stretch) to all the topics already covered, it falls in the most absolute of the líos´; in any other time, my armchair companion asked over and over again, to the failure of a server to clarify your doubts, we will have to watch thanks to the DVD the other 2 tapes.Anyway, in short, a close regular for a saga (palomitera) quite decent.PS: Do not leave the room until after the closing credits, as there is a scene which, by way of farewell, Star 2 of the main protagonists. |
1,854 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2418 | José A. Peig | Transformers | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Transformers? It is only a circus of special effects and does not comply with some minimum attributes so that it can be a clever commercial product. | Often the debate always arises: the problem of putting special effects and noise to the story and characters in a suitable climate dramatic settings. And yet when it's designed films, exclusively, to entertain in the summer months, it is not so important that the narrative is well-structured as the story itself is interesting, innovative, intelligent. Do you realize the reader of how complicated it is to make a good movie?. When no fault structure, fault history, when the story is good, it fails the estructura.¿Transformers? It is only a circus of special effects and does not comply with some minimum attributes so that it can be a clever commercial product.The story: nothing at all. Bad robots, good robots. In the end good ganan.los (ja-ja-ja). But they are also good because Yes, because neither the design nor the characterization of the aliens on sides indicate any antithesis. See what reduces the character of Optimus: do Hello, I am a good robot and I am here to help you if you help me, because humanity deserves to be saved?. And megatrón, yuck, is the reostia: do I am megatrón and I am malisimo, human beings are a few worms.?. It is disgrace.So the story has a soul, or we can also define as can dramatic force?, the characters must occupy a space, this dramatic weight to exijimos in a plot deployment. But happy robots are history, neither story nor argument: are a spectacular and noisy gossip, do many stunts, they metamorphosed with an overwhelming visual display, stick jumps, they shoot, they organize camorras between them how nice.Speaking in silver, do Transformers? This is the version for the summer of 2007 of similar products as do Independence Day?, do Godzilla? or the day of morning?. Or is what is colloquially called a do americanada? without substance, bland, designed according to the popcorn and propaganda: the army always plays a crucial role in the struggle between the human and the external forces that invade us. It is a blatant transposition of the same story, changing the external appearance of the main elements, the writers copied the scheme according to a commercial formula already exploited until the nausea.And a story this, Shia Labeouf, undoubtedly the best of the function (its hysterical humor is priceless), diluted - and with it, the little interest offered by the plot - before the progressive involvement of the military. And I hope to not be expressing me wrong, I'm not saying that the film is bad because the military are not to our liking (we know, here tastes or one) but because the character of Labeouf was who could lead the soul to history, the helpless citizen who suddenly is involved in a transcendent mission. In other words, the uniqueness of the work. Do all this becomes Borage water when, above all in the last third, the film becomes a plagiarism and remake of bad movies as?Independence day? and similar. When is cinema not cinema, but a showcase prefabricated for the less demanding young public.The movie is not boring, record. Do you have good moments of humour, even it would seem that motivates a healthy parody of usages and customs in the current? american way of life?. The pitorreo, in that sense, is constant, and covers even the end credits. Eye patch: is not that the film be taken seriously itself. First and foremost, the film is pitorrea and mocks the Viewer, and especially of lovers of good cinema of adventures, good designed cinema for teenagers, that there have been and, hopefully, it will occur. |
1,855 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3565 | Ana Belén Pacheco | December Boys | 2 | 5 | muchocine | The majority of the film have a sense of Deja vu stale and spiced with its tremendous slowness and excessive length her may be occasionally quite infumable. | It is possible that in many States of America they away by what I'm about to say, but it is that I can not help it because to me Daniel Radcliffe makes me much. I am aware that a generational barrier separates us but its newly acquired most of age gives me hope yet but is that it was to see him in Equus and since then not I can remove me it head. This "gifted" actor tries to desperately escape that role of boy wizard with this independent Australian production (that of the same Warner) where a group of orphans is sent on holiday to the beach during the Christmas holidays. While children fantasize with the idea of the largest to be adopted will have more comprehensive and carnal thoughts. Come on, the typical boring film of discovery of adolescence purée with the tedious insistence of the life of the unfortunate orphan. December Boys have that whiff television film mixed with the "My girl" syndrome, i.e. as soon as you see to a kid running in shorts you have the feeling that someone has to die from one moment to another and you can not stop doing cabals on who will be the cold cuts. I will not say if in the end this curse is consummated because I have no spirit Spoileador. In fact the majority of the film have a sense of Deja vu stale and spiced with its tremendous slowness and excessive length her may be occasionally quite infumable. Because despite the enthusiasm that wakes me Mr Radcliffe say that it has happened as well as Elijah Wood he has been Harry Potter face forever! (the poor Elijah have even worse because stayed you face of Hobbit which is rather less attractive and much more quietly to the fantasies erotic festive that the type of the wand) therefore when you see the lower December boys kid only thing what you may think is in slap it so his glasses back to Harry.In short, surplus 100% |
1,856 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/29 | Tito Chinchan | Alone in the dark | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Special efectillos script and action without ton are neither | Warning to all my readers, not going to the cinema to see this film, which is a giant truño. Warned quedais. Alone in the dark comes, the title of a game which was released for the PC makes a pile of years. It was an absolute novelty, as well as a revolution. He had a good script, three-dimensional graphics and a camera system that was the cane. Because this film only resembles the game name.The film is a man who lived a few strange experiments during his childhood in the horfanato, until he suffered an electric shock, instead of materle as it should be, gave birth the monstrosity of this film. Years later, tell us that they are following the search of artifacts left by an ancient pre-americana civilization (when this was a pangea, more or less) who had contacted other worlds and not be that more pods. Total, then leave some bugs that eat humans, and they defend and die explodes everything and ends and your breathe. But then follows and you want to cut the veins, and when it seems that you have not completed, will and ends. Incredible. that you want tell you more? Special efectillos script and action without ton are neither. Tontísimos actors who act without any coherence. And worst of all, beyond of the Dantesque end, is the sex scene. Who fucks with the shorts? That woman does it with bra? We will man, give joy to life, no matter you take hiperviolentas scenes of death and destruction but not sacais "chicha". |
1,857 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4273 | Jaime Martínez | Arma Fatal (Hot Fuzz) | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Attractive, witty, and surprisingly entertaining and fun; an excellent and ingenious portrait and parody of the film police, much higher than the average of parodies that proliferate both today and are simply in an I want to and I can not. | Fatal weapon (Hot Fuzz): you have to see, that pleasantly surprised I took with fatal gun. It was time that I not laughed so much and so a taste with a film of these features. Hilarious - from start to finish - English parody of intelligent humor laden with references to the action-horror film. He paid tribute, and at the same time laughs at them and themselves. Difference with other parodies of the type Epic movie, date movie, or Scary movie 4. While these did you vomit and retorzerte in the seat (less evil that do not exceed the 85 minutes), weapon fatal glad see her. I had read good things about it, but did not expect me to see the crazy and hilarious comedy that would be. After the super hit had Edgar Wright with his particular parody on movies from zombies on Zombies Party, now comes the turn of parody over American cinema (than irony because the producing and directing is English) with the typical police film full of explosions and pyrotechnics so characteristic and this type of tape Hollywood. All minutes of weapon fatal, exude English humor on all four sides, in exposed situations, both the archetype of the characters created, all perfectly defined and interpreted. Escorted to the script by the actor in this story, Simon Pegg, both manage to form a perfect match when you enter the amount of gags and jokes abound in fatal weapon, and raise the adjective of prank to unsuspected heights. The film revolves around a British superpolicía who is moved to a seemingly peaceful London town. But much more the reality, the small town will become a box of surprises, with all kinds of neighbors and eccentric and most hilarious situations. The director and screenwriter, echoes of all topics and clichés of the genre of action for perpetrating one of the greatest tinker in 2007. We will not only find the more English humor, but that there is also room for the absurd humor (more common in the film of the couple Abrahams-Zucker), jokes, gags, surreal situations, and parodies of other tapes of action as called Bodhi or Bad boys II. Apart from being a blend of action and comedy, especially comedy, we have a good part of parody to horror, type Scream and be lo que hicisteis. So we will see the thousand times seen masked killer who is annihilating "poor" people of the town. And here is where the director pointing somewhat; as we already enjoyed Zombies party, Edgar Wright shows us scenes of blood and gore as they should be; well explicit. In this way, lovers of the genre, which I certainly am, see satisfied our concerns resolved with the murders will occur. Thus, we will have our good dose of offal and blood thanks to hack, desmembramientos, death and various crushing; all this seasoned a good comic basis. As for the script, eccentricities full course does waters at any time, keeping the expectation in the viewer despite two hours of footage that has the film. This is due largely to the frantic Assembly that has the tape, recalling moments (in the English and furious) to the works of the always controversial Guy Ritchie. On the other hand, everything bad lies those responsible for its distribution in Spain and the director of dubbing. Firstly, the Spanish title is overused and thousand times seen, HORRIFYING. If the head of marketing aims to attract the public with that title you ready. And then there is the awful dubbing that accompanies the work. If you have the opportunity to see it in g.w. don't hesitate. In short, attractive, witty, and surprisingly entertaining and fun; an excellent and ingenious portrait and parody of the film police, much higher than the average of parodies that proliferate both today and are simply in an I want to and I can not. With a very equitable humor, since some easy jokes even more intelligent, biting and satirical humor come together in fatal weapon; a film that leaves us an excellent taste in the mouth. It seems that the tandem formed by Wright and Pegg continues to operate. |
1,858 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/801 | Natalia Eseverri | Va a ser que nadie es perfecto | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Exquisite dialogues with a very clever humor. After seeing her you you get a very nice surprise. | When I saw the trailer for this movie, I thought it was a typical comedieta style Santiago Segura with Santi Millán and Fernando Tejero exaggerating too much his role as handicapped and and the truth is that after seeing her you you get a very nice surprise. What stands out above all of the film is its sensitivity towards people who have a disability of any kind, in fact the creator of the film's screenplay, Albert Espinosa is lame from it for a long time and is also the author of the wonderful 4th, floor which is a person who knows first-hand the problems faced by this kind of people to society. In the film, exquisite dialogues with a very clever humor are and also critical to all parts of society, both to persons dealing with disabled people as if they were idiots like to many people that always gets defensive when it is a mere comment on disability which has not the slightest importance. None of the three protagonists exaggerates in his interpretation, moreover, they are quite credible characters adopting. Situations that have to pass are very fun playing much with deficiencies in hearing, sight and a limp that mixed with such situations give a very surprising cocktail and at the same time produces you more than one smile. And I don't want to forget of exceptional leadership by Joaquin Oristrell who cares the script a lot and makes the film a rhythm and a quite pleasant interest towards the Viewer. |
1,859 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3252 | Ramón Balcells | La extraña que hay en tí | 2 | 5 | muchocine | A failed immersion in the world of guilt and revenge. Don't know if this is a tribute to Charles Bronson, but it would certainly be dissatisfied. | Some are already somewhat tired of both post 11-S. Greengrass and Lee (Spike) already made grandiose and entertaining films, respectively, about the tragedy, although they were totally different and incomparable. Now comes Neil Jordan from Ireland to, secretly, a reflection on the consequences of that horrific day, although I say secretly because cover it with the history of an urban justicira who wants to take revenge on those who killed her boyfriend. Sounds like a topicazo, and it is, but Jordan unfolds, fortunately, regularly leaving a maja, although equally unsuccessful commercial film. And one of the good things that has is a Jodie Foster great, with a couple of truly appalling scaean, and a great Terrence Howard who can handle as NY police. A final clumsy (go a plagiarism to this wonder of Fincher!) makes the odd in you is to dismantle and cease to be what it was as a whole (more or less like the character of Erica).The plot is simple, although the Irish the wraps in such a way that it seems, more or less deep, with reflections on revenge and that as common sense of guilt. Yes, the character of Foster repeated thousand and one times the same, I don't know if so it is clear to us, or because it just always feels the same once he has Avenged. The film is repetitive, predictable and on several occasions extremely unrealistic or makes no logical sense, but is at the same time shot realistically, with a pulse by Jordan truly staff and some bright flat sequence as Erica escaping through the streets of the city (similar to the initial, ESA Yes, magnificent and previous film director)(Breakfast on Pluto). He has successes, although it has more bugs. It is risky, topical, predictable, strange (never better said). First and foremost, a failed immersion in the world of guilt and revenge. Don't know if this is a tribute to Charles Bronson, but it would certainly be dissatisfied. |
1,860 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1620 | Jesus Lens | El velo pintado | 3 | 5 | muchocine | A nice and discreet, film with Visual and symbolic finds that, while not will go down in the history of the cinema, leaves a good sediment in the Viewer. As one of those wines of confidence. Of the whole life. | What rare. Because we don't talk of a blockbuster or a saga type mission impossible III. We talked about a movie time, based on a novel of the very classic and old w. Somerset Maughan. and nothing more. A love story in exotic landscapes and difficult circumstances. "And it is already.""The painted veil" is a film for adults, paradoxically, without sex. A film without childish, monadas, special effects or all the paraphernalia that seems lately drag people to the halls of cinema. And yet with all the predicaments to give a sound slap at the box office, the film is produced by the actors, who are also not Tom Cruise and Julia Roberts, precisamente.¿A what responds so brave and committed attitude? I do not know. But it has merit. "And in view of the crowd that had been in the room last Sunday, bet maybe not exit them badly at all.""The painted veil", precocious and intimate at the same time, are welcomed. There are some interesting things, well directed, the protagonists are credible, photography is fable, the music accompanies. but it becomes long. For my taste, fifteen minutes long. Or twenty. And even so, salts happy film. Well, happy perhaps not. Satisfied. Without sense of loss of time.Personally, I liked some details. For example, the game with the feet and shoes. These shoes of the Watts, splashing in the mud at the beginning, to these neat and white shoes looks after. Shoes Cartesian left next to the bed by the brainy scientist shoes pulled in the passion of the moment by the intervenor vivales, ending with bare feet than. good. We prudently silent.And another very defining moment. Husband and wife chatting about themselves. She will accuse affectionately, during his honeymoon trip to Venice, he spend in explaining how it worked the whole shebang of channels, the conduction of water, etc. She, flippantly, tells him that he would have preferred to stay in Sandwich, playing golf. And it is precisely the frivolity of it, which kills the time making a grinder role, which provides the solution to the ills that plague the Chinese people that have based her husband: carry the water with a Ferris wheel. through a system of canalization. Finally, husband and wife, work together, doing what they best know.And an excellent secondary, of those that serve to explain how the tiny British Isles could dominate half the world: when cholera has made havoc and everyone is dead or has fled, there are colonial, undaunted, agent viewing time: "they sent me to come and here I am." No more doubts, chimeras or questions. A nice and discreet, film with Visual and symbolic finds that, while not will go down in the history of the cinema, leaves a good sediment in the Viewer. As one of those wines of confidence. Of the whole life. |
1,861 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2888 | Berto | La Jungla 4.0 | 3 | 5 | muchocine | A more than worthy continuation of the adventures of John McLane, who manages to entertain from start to finish, showing us a Bruce Willis that it seems that the years have passed you just Bill widely. | John McLane again, and returns to big. This last Friday premiere at last in Spain the fourth installment of the saga Crystal jungle, after being released in the U.S. in late June. For me one of the best sagas as action is concerned, especially its first part an authentic benchmark in action cinema and framework the bases for all the films that came behind. Will it be this quarter at the height of the above? Because if and not, let me explain: first of all it is very difficult to maintain in comparison with the original film, authentic masterpiece and that it has not yet been exceeded since its premiere there by the year 1988. But well, is not so serious, because although the two following sequels are pretty well, being the second to my the more loose in the series, nor reach the quality of the original, although they remain a continuation more than worthy.Analyzing the films in this way, I believe that La jungle 4.0 if that manages to become a worthy continuation of previous deliveries, keeping the level of the third installment, which coincides in various situations, either because this returns to be the scene of the action of the film, an entire city and surpassing slightly the second part, which although entertaining doesn't have the hook that may have these other two. It is true that in this fourth installment the action becomes so spectacular that directly pass to science fiction to defy any law of known physics, although thinking coldly, I do not know any film of the genre of action that is realistic, although if attach less exaggerated than this if there are quite a few. Anyway, follows the general lines of the protagonist in the previous installments, already, jump from a skyscraper hooked to a fire hose, go on the wing of an airplane in full take-off and explode it in full flight or the flow of water rather than drag you you boosting upwards just for the single output are things that already has accomplished in previous installments and nobody says anything about that.What if I drew so much attention is the dubbing in Spain. Do I this film already had seen when his premiere in the US, at the end of June, and because of the rating of minors of 13 that put him in the us the truth that the language of McLane lost integers, since I remember, just drop some shit from time to time and little more?. But the situation in Spain to an adaptation of the script in which McLane becomes radically changed, giving us more witty and poorly spoken in all the previous films together, what is appreciated, as much of the personality lost in the original version is due to his finesse when speaking during the footage.History not be you can highlight much, in this case Bruce Willis has to face a group of software pirates, but that if instead of Hackers would have been a Taliban army, or a Satanic sect had not cared, have would have loaded them all just after leaving a trail of blood throughout the film. That Yes, the action sequences are fairly well spun throughout the film, getting that since the film begins action soars and does not end until the closing credits of the final, something essential and House brand.Actors, the role takes him, of course, Bruce Willis, who returns to show us to a John McLane in full form, and with the physical form which shows throughout the film I think that we have McLane for awhile.You can not say that the wrong function, Timothy Oliphant, very discretito in this film, playing without a doubt worse evil that he has faced in all Bruce Willis saga, and is he dedicates himself to wander among computer screens and put faces to mentally cube roots, which does not help anything to your of if limited character. Justin long, it cannot be said much, really annoying in the development of the film nor hinders it, putting the touch more weak to the film, as opposed to that real Action Man is Bruce Willis.De the side highlight Maggie Q, that this beautiful up pasting is kicked with Willis, and Mary Elizabeth Winstead, with a clavadito character of his film father. The director, Len Wiseman, although do not perform a task too remarkable, being normal in a production of these features, which can get you some successes, especially in terms of what the action scenes refers, showing us always the camera from the best position possible to appreciate in all its magnitude and fixed what is happeningquite appreciated seeing the latest fashion videoclipera record a match to 200 frames per second using 7 cameras at the same time.In short, a more than worthy continuation of the adventures of John McLane, who manages to entertain from start to finish, showing us a Bruce Willis that it seems that the years have passed you just Bill widely and that under the success worldwide with this fourth part, already is this talking about filming the fifth, that if, while maintaining at least this film, please. |
1,862 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3581 | Jokin García | Habitación sin salida | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Movie without great pretensions that offers a fun time and gives it, but no one expected a masterpiece of terror, which is another ´producción more with clichés and clichés. Popcorn, armchair, another thing and entertaining evening. | Although of similar title, it has nothing to do with the "Lost room" series, but that Vacancy (its original title) is a horror film that used to hang out but will not go to the annals of the history of the movies of fear.Tells us the incident voyage of Amy (Kate Beckinsale, whom we have seen in such films as "Pearl Harbour" or "Underworld") and David (Luke Wilson, Owen Wilson rubio hermanísimo) a young marriage in crisis, who has just lost his son in a car accident and is in divorce proceedings, going through their last journey together. He chooses to take a secondary road, leaving the Interstate, and if something has taught us the American cinema is that all good secondary road its motel/gas station with psychopath.As it cannot be otherwise, the car breaks down and they have to stop in a sinister motel, dirty, flaking and doomed to suspend any inspection of the departemanto of health that throw you, and there they discover something quite frightening, the room is full of snuff tapes, and filmed in the room they are! And the nightmare begins when they discover that they are stars invited to one of these sinister films.The premise is interesting and (cinematically) manages to maintain decorum, not pass to a runs-that-you-pill between the protagonists and the bad, quite stereotyped all of them, but if you like the genre, without being a masterpiece, is entertaining (and I confess that it is a genre increasingly throws me more) |
1,863 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/982 | Ramón Balcells | Casino Royale | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Authentic wonder of entertainment. A tape full of authentic and realistic action that, despite their long duration - 144 minutes - is not heavy. | Myself, I am always left with Roger Moore, not afraid at all to Daniel Craig. Moreover, I wanted to him change the face to James Bond, after some ridiculous movies starring Pierce Brosnan which on science fiction. Because now, the most prestigious agent of Great Britain has become, more innovative, real, mature and imperfect, but with a twist of plot, already to the new adventure based on the first adventure, written by Ian Flemming and titled Casino Royale. The fact that a film is written by Paul Haggis and IE, and much. The double Oscar-winning and nominated by his perfect dash of Million Dollar Baby, brings to the main script of the film (written by Neal Purvis and Robert Wade) one touch of seriousness, realism and Brutalism. And the truth is that you notice, and much. The new Bond is an agent with defects, mistakes in their work, irony, and above all, very gross. The film opens in a black and white precious, with a rich contrast. James Bond, an agent without a license to kill, is loaded with a pair of shots on a snitch in his Office, although having previously explained how ended his contact (tuned to the blurred scenes of the bathroom, shot with an unpublished sadism in the last Bond). From there, start the magnificent opening credits, with mixtures of games of cards and guns and characters in movement formed by ACEs, diamonds and hearts. The fact is that Casino Royale has a top hotel, hardly seamless, attractive. The rest of the film will be better that can see it you, because but loses the grace (has already well, lost with what I said now). We are going to talk about Daniel Craig, then. I have to say that I am absolutely satisfied with the election of this actor, say what, actorazo. Nobody better than he could have interpreted this hard type, although a tad Ghost (but not pull vacuum by a swamp, not), with irony English, elegant when it does lack and beast and sadistic when also does. Also in this new installment, secret agent maintains a love affair long, nothing passing, as it used to happen with the previous ones, so the feature of embobado by this delight is Eva Green also has noted. Anyway, that this English actor would say that it is the perfect Bond. Let me now turn to the Bond girl. Eva Green, highlighted by his performance in dreamers, Bertolucci, also might be the perfect Bond girl. The why? The truth is that it has several reasons: tie, so to speak, with the protagonist, that creates such picaresque including Chemistry two (at the beginning of their relationship) which makes that Vesper Lynd (that is how it is called), is a woman of strong character and nothing, a weak symbol, as it was the case in the other Bond. Here, both Bond and Vesper are symbol of strength. In short, both are the Bond and the perfect Bond girl, and this makes Casino Royale Casino Royale. Another strong point of the film are the numerous scenes of action. All of them, from which opens the film, located in Madagascar, they are really dizzying, full of tension, long, but however nothing heavy. You could highlight each one of them, and is that the already named Madagascar, both, the Venice airport or which is located in the Museum, for not letting me hiper-tensos intermediate between each poker game, make the film shows his more adventurous and more realistic side. And it is that Casino Royale not lacks nothing. We have spoken of love and action, which is why I need the drama. The tape has many touches of this genre, so many, I will highlight some of them: the heavy conscience that it has stuck in the head Vesper, seeing James fighting on the ladder of the casino, makes immerse themselves in the shower of the hotel to forget about the past, it so Bond, how not, her help sitting beside her. Or in that same piece, do not miss the agent bleeding as a desperate and a half crying for have been uploaded to this pair. That Brosnan would never do it, come on, that neither despeinaría fighting. Attentive, SPOLIER. And finally, the last scene in which appears Vesper, drowning in the submerged lift of a Venetian building and Bond with her trying to get out of there, although knowing full well that he is saving the woman who has betrayed. This scene is, quite simply, the best of the film. End of the SPOLIER. Finally, within the more artistic aspects of the film, highlight the evil Le Chiffre, played by Danish Mads Mikkelsen. In all the James Bond movies, the villain of the function always had intended ending the world, either destroying it (view to a kill or die another day) or liquidating it (all the others). In Casino Royale, the evil is not intended to do this sort of thing. Its intention is his work, arms trafficking, and rather than submit to Bond to machines that rub science fiction, what torture with a whip directly (attentive to that scene.) (It is terrible and sometimes ironic). Well say that Mads Mikkelsen is superb in his role, crying blood as making crying tears to his enemies. Within the technical aspects, Casino Royale is not devoid of detail. Music, superbly carried out by David Arnold and Chris Cornell (in the magnificent main song, You know my name).And of course, the Visual effects, that without past thread (here die another day), are incredibly credible (as the scene of the collapse of the Venetian building). In short, the film by Martin Campbell is a true marvel of entertainment - good-. A tape full of authentic and realistic action that, despite its long duration - 144 minutes-, is not heavy, or much less. Do not miss Casino Royale, although you are not fans of James Bond. I would say that this is better still. |
1,864 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1062 | Francisco Bellón | Luces al atardecer | 3 | 5 | muchocine | It's an intimate film, full of emotions contained in stories not told in the solitude of a cold, almost eternal night, in which the light is an object of unattainable desire. | In the current film seems already only matter that movies do much box office and reap substantial benefits, and whether to reach so prized goal we must strangle the originality, creativity, and ultimately, what has made the film an art. But with the existence of several film awards, and the prestige that dan (or in theory they should be), the leaders of the film industry are the excuse to continue betting, minimally, for the quality. All sectors of the film we obsess to know what film will win such or which award, the human being takes competitiveness in the blood. Why surprised that someone that a filmmaker as Aki Kaurismäki reject once again go to the Oscars (for his opposition to American policy) to be his film lights in the evening selected to compete for the statuette.Lights of the sunset, Kaurismäki offers an intense portrait of the loneliness of the human soul through the character of Koistinen (Janne Hyytiäinen), a poor man who earn the living as security guard, with which the fate he has prepared a bad play. It is the story of a loser, but not a loser sordid as the film we are accustomed, but a romantic loser, that always keeps a ray of hope for more shaking it receives from life. Kaurismäki shows with Finnish Cadence to a Koistinen fits the beatings with resignation and stoicism, which therefore becomes a character loved by the Viewer. It's an intimate film, full of emotions contained in stories not told in the solitude of a cold, almost eternal night, in which the light is an object of unattainable desire. All this is based on wonderful performances of its cast, which highlights a Janne Hyytiäinen that supports the entire weight of the tape, and like his character, makes it quiet way, with great restraint.Lights at dusk is a film to a minority audience, but those viewers who dare to see the new work of Aki Kaurismäki will find a kind of cinema that is not common nowadays, and will be pleasantly surprised of the room. |
1,865 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/538 | Jose Contreras | Click | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The protagonist, uses his remote control to skip the scenes of his life that you dislike, so not lives them. We, the public, spent half of our life on autopilot. | I don't know if the Click writers have read the book of "Fish", but honestly I prefer the movie to the infamous prose of the book to hear the same speech. "Fish" is a vain attempt to explain with four axioms as it creates a good atmosphere among people. The two first, "must be present" and "one chooses his State of mind," are those illustrating the film.Not be present is called in the film "autopilot". The protagonist, uses his remote control to skip the scenes of his life that you dislike, so not lives them. We, the public, turn on auto-pilot half of our lives, and 100% of working time. Has someone received once in his life a sincere smile of a seller, a window or a waiter?The premise of the film is that Adam Sandler Gets a remote control that allows you to rewind, pause, and accelerate your life at will. So the man passes pipe with the buttons making your holy will until the writers Ascend you to the chepa and decide to give him a good lesson. This second part, somewhat less fun but necessary for viewers leave the film made some more civilised guys, fusilada is the visit of the ghost of Christmas come of the "Christmas Carol" by Charles Dickens, or if you like, of its film version, "That beautiful it is to live". |
1,866 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2645 | El mágico | Los 4 Fantásticos y Silver Surfer | 4 | 5 | muchocine | I really liked, and I think that if you are unprepared to see it, stripped of prejudices, it love... | I remember that "Fantastic 4" was one of the early criticisms of this blog a couple of years ago and perhaps for that reason also remember clearly that it was not a good movie. Much money invested, an expensive advertising campaign, a mixed result. So, to be the sequel to the saga went to the cinema with some degree of skepticism: same director, same cast, same result? But not! This is positive from the movie world, that the phrase "never the second parts were good," not always is confirmed. Here Tim Story decides to play for the visual deployment instead of working the emotional characters and the tape WINS in entertainment and conviction with the new format. "Fantastic four: rise of the Silver Surfer", may not have much to offer for those who are not followers of the factory Marvel Comics, however, what it proposes is a story direct, intense, full of action and excellent special effects that will delight any average viewer. Not encotraremos subtleties in this part, the script is quite simple and the four protagonists move history demonstrating a great predisposition to the resolution of conflicts through little subtle means, but okay. Sequences of fighting against the Silver Surfer are fine and scenarios that runs the production make us remember to any movie of 007. For those who are interested in the plot all starts when an enigmatic intergalactic Herald, the Silver Surfer (character that combines the work of WETA - Lord of the rings - special effects company, with actor Doug Jones - Abe Sapiens in Hellboy - who put the body to interpret it and nothing less than Lawrence Fishburne who contributed the voice!), comes to Earth to prepare it for destruction. But of course, in this path of destruction will find an original ally in the central villain of the previous delivery Victor Van Doom (Julian Mac Mahon, reliable in every chapter of my favorite series, Nip/Tuck) who recovers waiting for revenge of our heroes. While this villain runs (Silver) the world generating strange craters, Reed, Sue, Johnny and Ben (Ion Gruffudd, Jessica Alba, Chris Evans and Michael Chiklis in similar line, complying with the script and not much more) must solve the mystery of of the surfer in a context complicated for the group where the main couple wants to casarse.y not only that but have a normal family! As they embarrassment, this is the nice side of the film, with some discussion isolated on the responsibility and the harassment of the media. But it is the least. What is worth the price of admission are the action scenes; the most interesting are technically of the persecution in Manhattan and the attack on the amusement park in Londres.Aunque to be fair, there is to say that the film proposes something simple and met: there is guarantee of entertainment. Good by Tim Story, by writers Don Payne and Mark Frost that adpatan a story from the middle of the 1960s and the business to an attractive content for the public that today fills the rooms around the world; they are fantastic. I really liked, and I think that if you are unprepared to see it, stripped of prejudices, it love. |
1,867 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2132 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | El infierno | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Incisive, cold, nothing commercial: demonstrates that there is European cinema of moviegoers dyes, although the script and ideas are provided.... | Krzysztof Kieslowski left three scripts for titles of biblical reminiscences. Tanović Bosnian retrieves the author of the trilogy humanist views / three colors. The story of three sisters to vivien the suffering of a devastating child episode: the newly come from prison father, rejected by the mother and committed suicide. Broken innocence, vital disillusion and pain as a backdrop of a life led by a secret that will slowly twisting the existence of these sisters. The vision of Tanović is sad: there is no hope in the world drawing. The family exists to catch-up or does not and the circumstances, routine or random lead to that I think that there is life within these women and that the feelings that explicit will unite at the end and all. Chromatic formulas of Kieslowski uses Tanović to reflect the intimacy of each sister (blue, red and white/green) and also uses the symbolism on the passage of time. Some excess verbiage lastra the fluidity of some images that already have by themselves. The consent of solitary confinement is not reflected in a tiresome theatrical speech, occasionally. Perhaps that is why the tape I was cold, far removed from any passionate. One of those uncomfortable movies that catch you, but want to drop because you not agree what he says.Life is beautiful and sometimes choked with bad drinks, said crudely, but hell should not be family. And that, after all, is what Tanović comes to tell. His gaze toward the fundamental issues of human existence (paternity, incommunicado detention, family, love, desire, suicide, fraternity even..) is an academic pessimism varnished.Lack of burning. Are not dealing with a genuine work, written from the heart: is peek echoes of the cinematography of Bergman and the own Kieslowski, clear, but for those who have not seen anything about these two prodigious filmmakers, hell is a snooty work that comes from a man hardened in war (in no man's land) and in another kind of clearer hellmore carnal. Ultimately, this is the origin of the other. Perhaps the evils of this world come from the silence of the family. Tanović was drawn this universe of women so pleasure to our Almodovar after having triumphed with a film of men, war and nothing intimate which received even an Academy Award for best film from non-English speaking. The female cast is masterful: Emmanuel Beart and an avejentada Carole Bouquet are splendid. As said the own Tanović in any press conference: who the hell was at home, were not going to Afghanistan or to the streets of Baghdad to see it closely. Absolutely right. |
1,868 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2316 | Francisco Bellón | Shrek Tercero | 2 | 5 | muchocine | If I had to compare to Shrek the third with some stories, this would be no doubt the tale of the dairy, because both the pitcher goes to the source which in the end is broken | If there is a place on the face of the Earth that all stories are known to imply, undoubtedly it is Hollywood. The Mecca of cinema is a large factory that spread the message confectioner's "and they lived happily and ate partridges". Not to mention another of their specialties, the Chinese tales, which sold to the world with no less enthusiasm. But if the stories have taught something to Hollywood, it is the philosophy of the goose that lays the golden eggs, and we should exploit the successes to its logical conclusion.All this has a good reason, and is that the OGRE more sympathetic, transgressive, green and performed by computer has given the entertainment industry returns to the screens. On this occasion, before the death of King Harold, Shrek will depart in search of Arthur, only legitimate heir to the throne of very very far. However, Prince charming has their own plans and try to gain the throne, recruiting all the villains of fairy tales. Shrek the third is a new and unnecessary return of nut to the world of tales, which tries to repeat without success the keys to the success of the films that preceded. The ingenuity of the previous scripts has disappeared entirely, and is replaced by a series of jokes and easy jokes, besides not having grace, crossing the line between irreverence and apricot and vulgar. The characters have worn out over time, and in this third part we find acartonados, without the spark that characterized them. Only the inclusion of the posh princesses group and some sequences in the Institute show signs of freshness and originality. This Shrek the third becomes an indigesta tape while sucking the staff in a deep slumber, bored children and elderly, whose end is not grasping reach. But not all bad news, at a technical level it is a feat of digital animation, who not consoles is because you don't want to.Shrek was a real revolution in the animated film, as was his acid sense of humor looking more at adult audiences that to the child. Shrek 2 was shown as a worthy sequel, but this third installment is manifested as a new attempt of Hollywood by extending a history already didn't over themselves just to get good dividends. If I had to compare to Shrek the third with some stories, this would be no doubt the tale of the dairy, because both the pitcher goes to the source which in the end is broken. |
1,869 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2078 | Jeremy Fox | Sunshine | 3 | 5 | muchocine | A movie very dignified and above the average of its kind. | Admittedly you Danny Boyle (director of "Trainspotting", "The beach" and "28 days later" among others) his willingness to do something different everytime it gets after the cameras.This time he dares with science fiction, difficult genus that has, as I said once, with a very demanding public. "I have to say, without being a wonder, yes it has made a film very dignified and above the average of its kind.""Sunshine" puts us in the year 2057. The Sun is dying and mankind is facing extinction. The last hope for the Earth lies in the Icarus II, a spaceship with eight crew members. His mission: transporting a nuclear device designed to re-activate our dying star.Beyond the incredible plot premise conceived by screenwriter Alex Garland, must assess the effort to make something credible mission thanks to some details: the use of plants to generate oxygen and food, the plates protective of solar heat, sense of isolation, the cooling of the central computer (a kind of Hal9000), etc. Of course the remarkable work of the art direction team it is helpful to do so.Bet Danny Boyle for the serious and credible, science fiction, based more on its atmosphere than in the spectacular (there that is, in certain doses). A result of this have a history whose tension is increasing and reaches have some really accomplished suspense scene.There are those who detect in the movie "2001" echoes of Kubrick and I, personally, think that they are not wrong at all. The problem arises when Boyle forgets its own approach and jumping of a style "2001 ″-style" final horizon, abandons the verismo and atmosphere to finish 20 minutes quite confusing, something efectistas function." I could not help thinking, during this final, that Boyle "had left you the pot".I see another default to the film (it seems that today I only speak of defects) and is that the tempo of the mission is not clear to the Viewer. In a film of these characteristics the viewer should have been warned, with some time, which is the next step to feel adequate tension when the time comes. We must prepare it. To the not happen, in my opinion, we are suddenly and almost without any notice in a risky situation. Part of the excitement is lost in this way.Fortunately, the strong leadership of Danny Boyle and the solvency of the cast always come to the rescue of a film that is, finally, a very decent entertainment. A small shame because I think that it could have been much more.Final evaluation moonfleet.es: 6 out of 10. |
1,870 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1916 | Ivan Sainz-Pardo | Sunshine | 2 | 5 | muchocine | It contains a couple of beautiful scenes thanks to elaborate special effects, but they succumb to general inconsistency, boredom, saturation, excess and the aggression of a thundering sound effects that just invite you to run. | Confusing, unconscionable, artificial, languid, noisy, bland, empty, failed, incongruous and absurd, with a few flat characters and an argument thrashed ajado, gnawed, re-read, revisto, remamado, conventional and no contributions or original ideas. Supposedly pretentious outside and merely badass inside. He could quietly pass by one of the bad and psychedelic trips of one of the protagonists of the great and so far away Trainpotting, but what really is, surely, is a pastiche without taste or criterion, nonsense, a waste of time and money for the unlucky ones who like me, see unfortunately attracted by the juggling and this unfortunate and disappointing film proposal colorines. It contains a couple of beautiful scenes thanks to elaborate special effects, but they succumb to general inconsistency, boredom, saturation, excess and the aggression of a thundering sound effects that just invite you to run. |
1,871 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1087 | José A. Peig | Babel | 2 | 5 | muchocine | That anyone thinks that there are cinematic genius behind the crushing apparatus of images and sounds. We are once again faced with a deceptive film, uséase, films that look very good movies but which are nothing more than correct mediocrity. | "How much pain, how much misunderstanding and passivity how much there is in this global village". Thus, speaking above, can be summarized the nature, the theme and the intention of Alejandro González Iñarritu and writers in his eagerness to create a very raw drama film, with a visual Bill which refers to the documentary style and that at this point has already been exploited on several occasions and in various genres.To begin with, if you want to make a film sobre "Oh my God, how bad is the world" isn't very constructive to restrict to a realism-style camera in hand to be directly inspired by the immediate reality of the documentary. If what is give a sense of realism in order to accentuate the dramatic potential of the narrated events, well it is as dramatic and effective gadget towards, at least, a decent show. But not to lose sight of your claims of film artist faced to the very heart of our current collective tragedy: that we are part of a whole interrelated, but more isolated and destructive than ever because of the absence of a global consciousness that manage (manage is not the exact word, but we are going so understanding.) and hold this network of responsibilities between all and for all.What we are trying to say is that, undoubtedly, "Babel" is a very well-intentioned film, which puts us in the face of a collective reality raw and devastating, but is not sufficient in relation to the proposed artwork. We are talking about little imagination conceptual, structural and visual envelope behind the film story. In the visual, so we have already said, pure documentary style so the viewer can have "sense of reality", which is inherent in the story actually unnecessarily. Nor is it to spare, but that no one creates there film genius behind the crushing apparatus of images and sounds. We are once again faced with a deceptive film, uséase, films that look very good movies but which are nothing more than correct mediocrity. In the case of "Babel," it is an interesting mediocrity, admit it. Go ahead of all that a "us" we liked the movie, but in "Images and words" touched us the ordeal of being objective, so, to the cloth.The superficiality and the plain of "Babel" are obvious instantly, with a look that integrates all seen in almost three hours: a Japanese who has a daughter sordomuda (poor passes very badly, this very single, society is very superfluous, etc etc etc.) which has sold a gun to a Moroccan Hunter which in turn sells it to another villager who leaves her provided to their children which, stick a shot by accident (?), an American tourist who has two children at home that they will spend straws because they take them holiday and amid the traffic of illegal immigrants are involved in dangerous tribulations. And that is the movie.Then, in regard to structure, nor is it too strong. Good organization of the sequences, but many of them do not end to anything truly substantial. See, see how the story of the Mexican lost in the desert and the type that is the flight ends leaving two children homeless. That it was not missing anything else?. Maybe, but it remains topical and insubstantial. The resolution of situations in a great movie (with a good dash of base) are never left halfway or finish as predictable way. Another thing is how the story of the japonesita and dad, ends that final hug Yes opens a subtle channel of suggestions, and is of the few moments in which one has the feeling of watching film. And the resolution of the story of the couple of Americans in Marruecos.prrrrrrrrfffffffffff. Yes, worth, the final hue of Brad Pit makes sense, but for that they don't need 145 minutes, that already I am nine in TVE news.Well, from that thread of connection between stories, an idea clear, Mannerist, topical will deploy. Full of feeling and pain by how are things, but his ability to dissect the complex and powerful reality facing the, it is null. And it aims to, there is the problem. If you want to express how bad that goes the world, just a single story that represents the universal problems. Mr González Iñarritu, to build a history of histories, a mystical vision of the global problem, is deflected onto one greater claim. This claim requires more than a succession of passages in which the Viewer cannot otherwise go jumping from one to another with the unique stunt that "there is a link between all of them".That something else had to leave the conceptual and visual creativity of the filmmaker, is not our task to find it, but will that, intuitively, any serious analyst discover that this film is hollow from the moment in which we deal with your "base text" and its substantive issues. The "superficial text", no doubt, has an overwhelming performance, rhythm not lapses ever and, at times, reach a subtle look of the intricate relationships between minds, cultures and spaces to the length and breadth of this unfortunate human globe. But only at times.From there, the only thing we have is an extensive video about people of diverse latitudes and cultures to which they happen a number of things. To end the slide show, the Viewer is left with the idea: "how screwed are and how bad we are". But, I repeat, that are now the news. What it was was put that same idea under a film treatment arising in a personal vision (genuine in art), which occurs, but at a minimum, a mere coral structure in which the facts are as simple as minimum progression (the narrated events respond to a sequence that could be summarized in a paragraph or a ten minute television documentary). I.e. Iñarritu tells me nothing that I do not know in advance, and even shows a capacity for approach me the problem from a unique perspective. And that — offer a unique perspective - is the creativity. And the film should be an act of creation, not a claim to say this or that thing about obvious issues and we know every day.Synthesizing, Babel is a significant, correct and well-intentioned production for free sentimental expression of their authors, but film, which reportedly cinema, there is very very little the justito. |
1,872 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2942 | Antoni Messa | Los ojos del mal | 3 | 5 | muchocine | A terrifying film which, despite being directed by a Californian, and North American production has been shot in its entirety at Australia. | The type is a very careful geek. It serves by the name of Jacob Goodnight. Of great stature and extremely cabezón, it distinguishes itself from the rest of the human by hold a hole in the back of his huge skull. He likes walking accompanied by his axe - the weapon of choice among all the tools of his precious workshop-DIY, which moves with the skill of an alien by labyrinthine corridors. Debtor of the misdeeds of Leatherface, unhealthy and solo character is marked by a compulsive collector passion; While some treasure glass marbles, he captures the eyes of their victims in jars filled with formaldehyde. They have evil tongues that morbid instincts and his angry chifladura drag them from an early age. In my times, the priests claimed that masturbation secaba brain; Surely, the Knight of the perforated testa never studied at a College of priests because, already very young, killed to straws to the naked Playboy, Penthouse and similar. And this has been.He that Jacob, in short, is the undisputed star of the evil eyes, a terrifying film which, despite being a production directed by a Californian, and American has been shot in its entirety in Australia; specifically in a few film studios of the Gold Coast of Queensland, which could mean a veiled (and deserved) tribute to the soundness of the current fantasy film in that country.The eyes of evil has many points in common with the also stimulating for enter to live, the telefilm made Jaume Balagueró for movies to not sleep, the series coordinated by Narciso Ibáñez Serrador. Like this, most of her footage takes place inside a squalid, gray and dilapidated property, at the time that one of the main coordinates of its argument connects directly with the title of Balagueró. |
1,873 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3964 | Moebius | Lenny | 5 | 5 | muchocine | "Lenny" offers an unforgettable panoramic view of the life of Lenny Bruce and his career as an artist. Excellent biopic directed by Bob Fosse. | The paper called it suicide.Lenny Bruce, a name is virtually unknown outside of the Anglo-Saxon culture, but especially in the United States is revered and admired by a legion of fans who read his autobiography, buy their albums and seek any material from the comic can be found. Lenny Bruce, a martyr for the cause of freedom of expression, a comedian in a short time swept all the barriers that he found his step and transformed the comedy American forever. Lenny Bruce, a comedian who went beyond the laughter to attack the hypocrisy of an entire society and denounce the perversions of political and religious. Lenny Bruce, the enemy of the establishment, an imperfect human being, as any other which gave fighter until that finally ended with him.Probably few could have taken the life of Lenny Bruce to the big screen in a manner so masterly as did Bob Fosse. The modern renaissance man who was Fosse was that rare kind of people, as the own Lenny, who left an indelible mark after Yes uncommon talent and hard work. Looking back sometimes it feels that had barely stepped on the Earth during a few seconds. However, his work appears doomed to last for centuries.Career as filmmaker Bob Fosse is as brief as eerily brilliant. It gives the feeling of Fosse was one of those people who was unable to do something wrong. Three titles stand out in his short filmography as director: Cabaret, Lenny and All That Jazz. Is which better? It's hard to say. However, should be recalled also the delicious adaptation became the director of the famous work the little Prince.It is no wonder that Lenny begins with the first level of a mouth (an introduction similar to the godfather of Coppola, who curiously competed and lost with the Fosse Cabaret), as the word is the weapon that uses Lenny Bruce to denounce everything that you think really obscene, false or corrupt. The concept of obscenity of politicians, judges and moralists certainly wasn't the same as the comedian. See a nude was not obscene for him, but yes it was that had religious living in luxury while would have people dying of hunger or malviviendo in many parts of the world. Even so, the Bruce (the character) is not defined as a moralist or a sobering. Talking about a story in the newspaper that concerns the expulsion of two teachers of a school for being gay, the comedian has no hesitation in stating that it will not donate the collection of that night to the cause of the expelled masters. Lenny is an observer: never go to a demonstration against the war of Viet Nam, but from its particular pulpit be ahead leaders and Governors, the Pope of Rome or any other corrupt establishment. Perhaps it may seem contradictory, but the comedian, despite being more than a simple count of jokes, is not deemed the champion of a great cause, nor seems that he intends to change the world. A Life magazine interviewer confesses that only it's their livelihood. On stage he will admit it is a taker; a hedonist which of course does not reject the luxury, but will shoot with incendiary performances to those who while living to enrich himself talk about public service and love of neighbor.The more humane and private Lenny Yes looks like a cluster of contradictions. In his stormy relationship with the stripper Honey Harlow, Lenny just betraying the love of what will be his wife and the love of his life. After suffering a spectacular accident his wife lies in bed at the hospital. A pretty nurse crosses in the path of the comic, and the inevitable end up happening. In the film his wife admits that infidelities of Lenny are due to his inferiority complex and a need to always prove himself. However, the marriage of the Bruce does water only on one side. Drugs and the infidelities of both end up destroying his marriage, which still will be a mutual affection and a young daughter.Halfway between biopic and an fictional documentary Lenny offers an unforgettable panoramic view of life of Lenny Bruce and his career as an artist. The powerful address of Fosse is simply brilliant. Between continuous temporal jumps, flashbacks, fictional interviews and fragments of performances by Lenny the director offers us in almost two hours a complete portrait of the legendary comic legend. Obviously Fosse introduces some artistic license, but the essence of the real character is there. Given that the language barrier can be insurmountable to understand what meant the actions of Bruce, the Fosse film will serve to ensure that those who are unaware of its existence become familiar with an essential figure of American Comedy and one revolutionary figure as others that appeared in that chaotic Decade of the 60.Desde its beginnings as a humble comedian in a slum in strip-tease trying to fit in the standard comedy of the time telling bad jokes and doing imitations of famous, through its glory days when America media was exhausted at his feet until the end with his sad last days where authorities harassed him and in his performances are dedicated to read extracts and their multiple obscenity trial proceedings, Lenny is one of the best film biographies that we have seen on the big screen. In addition, the use of jazz in the film Fosse is interesting. That fragments of the black music and sounds of Miles Davis is not casual, that not only is that Lenny was formed at exotic clubs where the jazz bands accompanied the desvestimientos of the dancers but the comedian could get to improvise in such a way as it would have done some crazy color bopper.The figure of Lenny Bruce and the great work of Fosse after cameras there to add extraordinary interpretation that Dustin Hoffman made the American comedian. As it was usual in it, the actor was prepared to fund, and on the screen we can see one of the most impressive transformations that have been carried out an actor to embody a real character. It is difficult to believe that they had offered the same role to Neil Diamond. At that time, Dustin Hoffman was almost unbeatable, was at its best and always offered great performances, but his work on Lenny is the best that has given us this man. Therefore it is also fair to recognize the work of the sexy actress Valerie Perrine, who leaves no swallow by the talent of Hoffman and also gives us a great performance as the woman of Lenny.Suele said (and is something I agree with) the films is better to see them in original version. On this occasion I think it is absolutely essential that Lenny is referred to in English, owing not only to the work of the actors but also to the particular way which had Lenny Bruce to unleash their gags and their acidic jokes. Virtually all phrases that Hoffman drops in proceedings are taken from performances and actual recordings of the comedian. That is why I insist on viewing in the original language.Beautiful girls who drink alcohol drinks, comedians that whisper licentious words in the ear of a stripper, jazz musicians who smoke marijuana. they are images of a party after a night of trabano in a strip-tease club, splendidly shot by Fosse, and are also the environment where a good day emerged Lenny Bruce, scourge of politicians, priests and rabbis, and also those standard comedians who based their repertoires in ethnic imitations and typical jokes about homosexuals. They tried to end with him, and soon face jail Lenny Bruce decided to commit suicide by injecting a heroin overdose. However, its legacy lasted until our days. In a symbolic gesture, after a campaign promoted by the wife and the daughter of Lenny the Mayor of New York acquit five years ago to the comedian of their sentences for obscenity. As a comedian or anyone can say words like fuck or cocksucker in public, the spirit of Lenny Bruce lives on. All this and more is what you will find in Lenny. |
1,874 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3057 | Bruji | Juegos secretos | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Overrated film of the highly regarded Todd Field. Invention of American critics, who, perhaps, desperate for a Stephen Frears English or a Pedro Almodóvar Spanish to ensure its own identity in the last years. | Movie made from an exhausted argument, outdated material hosted a narrative technique as expendable as unnecessary, irregular and sticky rhythm that, after two endless hours, holds the dubious redemption of its protagonists. Especially recommended for the more conservative readers of the NY Times.En film of recent years, "Amélie experiment" worked, so far, on one occasion, in Amélie. The presence of a narrator who provides its services to the length and width of the tape, only makes sense if its intervention contributes to the introduction of images that explains and supplements. If it is not, if this is not your work, your contributions are redundant, annoying and, in not few moments, incitadoras of the tedium.There lies the difference between making a determined approach by necessity or whim. And this freak, remaining brilliance for long courtship Sunday of the same director, leads to the failure of script in the recent adaptation of the Perfume, and constitutes the main error of the film that we discussed today.In this case, recourse to an inadequate structure, it relies on a tireless voice in off anything brings to the story of the screen, not only eternalizes the narrative rhythm and despair to the lovers of the characters well built, they get to be ridiculous in unnecessary descriptions. Remember the "presentation" of Jennifer Connelly, to which we have been seeing more than one hour in the movie or scene that occurs under the table.Caprice - and not the necessity-of avail themselves of this technique, is also responsible for that surfaces the abysmal gap between the dialogues - terribly mediocre - and exquisite phrases that make up the auxiliary narration, i.e. between the script of the film and the novel which item. Only suggesting that we we have an acceptable writer, Tom Perrotta, and a very bad adaptation. Nominated adaptation, however, great prizes, which also has - like almost everything in life - an explanation that I do not understand.Despite starting from a wrong premise, develop a cinematically exhausted argument, escape for a decent movie subplot, and indulge in unrealistic situations, the film reaches the resurrection when he tends to humor, sometimes, black British comedies, when it recreates the own funerary S.A. or the calendar girls scenes, as it happens in the Book Club gatherings or snacks in the Park.Yet again to lose the pulse wanting to convert to a woman of the 21st century in the protagonist of a soap opera Victorian of the sleepy James Ivory, to cross on the path of the American 1960s comedies and use the method of the game and shared screen (confidences to midnight), to show a timid attempt in the destructuring of the script at the time in which "the hermetic personita that crazy Kate" It is still found within it.And dies, inevitably, in the countless and endless scenes that transmit - and contagious - boredom and monotony of empty lives to the Viewer.Many of these aspects is could have been avoided. If you take a quick look at the history of the cinema, we discovered (the Filmography of Stanley Kubrick corroborated) alteration of the order sequence only should be applied at the request of the own history (it is not the case) and when it justifies it. Ashes of love found in 1941, in which to King Vidor him enough three flat to show the routine, the boredom and the existential crisis of the protagonist, (would have spared us the amuermantes pool sessions). And we came to the conclusion that the improvisation that characterizes the tapes of Robert Altman ensemble cast is not credible in other filmmakers. Ultimately, when the movie buff sense hopes remote attend a final Paul Haggis which cushions the unpleasant feeling of having lost time, we find ourselves with an inconclusive ending, open to multiple interpretations, does not exempt an attractive unable to save a condemned from the nineteen minute film that leaves an uncertain message. A message that offers much fabric cut, but that, out of respect to the reader, I take to the tomb of thought. What I would recommend, in this same line of social criticism (little criticizes games secrets), a production USA-UK in 2001, directed by Rose Troche, released in Spain in November 2003 with the title of the security of the objects. Theme similar, less pretentious and more accurate hereby guarantees an impeccable development and a magnificent interpretation of Glenn Close as icing on its extensive cast. . And this is the story of an excellent photography and an appealing art direction, obsessed by watches, working on Little Children, which failed miserably at the box office. A reality that contrasts with the overrated film of the highly regarded Todd Field that we have sold American critics, who, perhaps, desperate for a Stephen Frears English or a Pedro Almodóvar Spanish to ensure its own identity... who knows?. Knowing it or not, I have the conviction that the Lady of Sam Mendes is one of the best actresses of all time, that high school is wicked "pretty, pretty, of long legs", that the life of Emma Bovary does not cause a catharsis in his twenties as they did twenty years later, and that day come when thatPerhaps, discover some interesting mystery in this footage. For the moment, this - and not other - is my humble opinion. |
1,875 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2455 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | Zodiac | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Fincher has rewritten the classic patterns of the thriller. This is a sentimental, sickly, intimate thriller almost. | Thorough and suggestive to pornographic, overwhelming in their detailed dissection of a criminal investigation, Zodiac is not a commercial film in any way, although it contains traces of generous box-office because its quoted director, David Fincher film (Jeunet, Seven, fight club, panic room and the little The game) and its more than competent cast. Zodiac is a study on the obsession that descends from the purely descriptive (crimes, the relevant evidence of a case that alarmed the population of California during the last 1960s and early 1970s) up the sickly, representing by a series of characters encorsetados in a very ambiguous territory that is neither police nor journalistic. Fincher is not meant to miniaturize the plot; more on the contrary, what it does is hocicar his narrative in all the crevices talent so that the Viewer is being suffocated by a proposed excessive drama, perhaps too rigorous, not leaving his film character at any time and that explores with delinquent delectation in the aspects usually more hidden in this type of film Gadgets: inquiriesthe surveys that they are, at some point in the footage, tiresome and obviables, but without whose assistance the exquisite set is deslabazado, sluggish, as if he had stolen any minimum feature of credibility and we were attending any vulgar telefilm desktop on assassins in series and desquiciados policemen trying to hunt. As we have seen much film of this coat, it must be very demanding with Zodiac. The result? A masterful, almost overwhelming tape, in any case, perfect in their heightened sense of ethics and the epic because, well watched the final aftertaste that is: the of having swallowed a monumental sentimental outburst on justice, the right to find the truth and the obstacles that the time and the reluctance of the society has to give her when mediaauthentic depositaries of the mountains of data, have already decided to give sovereignty back. Zodiac dazzles for his hubris, which is also - in the view of some people--its largest says.It is not possible to reduce their excess: will require their two long hours so that no thread is without braid and, at the time, is the last thought that all threads to the abovinarse have not led to complete any Hank. Narrative never hit, Zodiac entertains at any moment and has the virtue of not licensing is perhaps perdonables: a more explicit truculence, a spirit to the Seven that Fincher is no stranger because that work teacher last entertainment film (commercial, say) is yours. What makes the director in this case is to rewrite the pattern on which address the gender of serial killers and reformulate his speech on the basis of criteria more literary, closest to connaisseurs models as all the President's men (I know that I am not the only one who has seen this similarity, in fact before see this was the only information that was in the film) or even JFK. His formal neatness, their lack of doctrinal enthusiasms and its marginal character in the thriller Zodiac make tape rather than recommended, is not the masterpiece that could have been (it has mimbres and incentives to be in those who thus consider it in their internal jurisdiction) but yes, and forcefully, one film more within the Fincher filmography at the height of Seven. Curious that his greatest accomplishments come from similar narrative foundations. Perhaps in the next foray into the genus give to man by listing view hundred and eighty degrees and dive in the melodrama or in the musical, and all without abandoning assassins in series, clear. |
1,876 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1973 | JLO | El Gran Dictador | 5 | 5 | muchocine | If it is not his best film, it is without doubt the most risky just by embarking on a production - with all United States in an ambiguous abstention-during the time of greater domain and influence German, making it so much more valuable. Without a doubt, a classic film of a classical artist. | The great dictator was created as a joke by the appropriation of Hitler in the mask of Charlie and his universal and famous mustache. Then it becomes in anger by the growth and popularity of this nefarious character, almost a vendetta made by an artist who at that time declares not to have the honor of being a real Jew.The remembered scene of the globe, with its infinite poetry and determination to portray the pathetic obsession of the dictator Hinkel (Hitler) and their longing for power; It is both a blunt weapon and an unforgettable film testimony, both its lyricism and their stay in the memory.It widens even more, to be linked to the rhythm of the scene at the hairdressers, in charge of the Charlie Barber and are of the Hungarian March by Brahms and his baile-fantasía, shaving a customer and prove unparalleled skill. Nor Chaplin in talkies break away altogether from the tramp, evidenced by several times played by the Barber.Only these two moments and their ten minutes of duration, would suffice to justify the name of this artist in letters of mold. A not happy scene played by Paulette Goddart limited - to declaim in the door of the ghetto-the final speech that some sounds pedantic, and some that another disjointed scene; they do not obscure the greatness and courage of a great film.If it is not his best film, it is without doubt the most risky just by embarking on a production - with all United States in an ambiguous abstention-during the time of greater domain and influence German, making it so much more valuable. Without a doubt, a classic film of a classical artist. Pure history.Summary: Chaplin made here two roles. As Hynkel, dictator of Tomania, orders to harass the Jewish population and planned the invasion of the neighboring country of Austerlich. As a Jewish Barber Charlie sees suffer their colleagues of the ghetto. The physical similarity of both characters leads to confusion, where the Barber coincidentally usurps the position of Hynkel, and finally delivers a speech in favour of peace, equality, democracy and brotherhood among men.This final speech turned the world. |
1,877 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1199 | Calaf | Apocalypto | 3 | 5 | muchocine | It is not wrong in these adverse times where it is believed that everything can be solved by dialogue, let us remember that the man has always been Hunter and warrior, and there is sometimes no choice but that fight... | I assume that you have already heard some things about this movie, if it is very violent, little rigorous historically. anything. Best thing is to forget everything and the only thing that if I tell you is that not expect an epic story, but rather one minor argument. A tribe attacked and a subsequent Chase - hunting that he occupies most of the tape.I will not enter into the historical presentation of the civilization. I don't have enough knowledge, while the director already tells us that it develops in the decline of the maya civilization, and therefore, its undeniable virtues and legacies are not dealt with in the same. In addition, no longer an action movie, violent (there are excesses in some images of blood), but in the context in which it develops, is not a violence that extremezca. Impressed me more scenes of El Laberinto del Fauno than these. Furthermore, the pace is hectic. There are moments for some easy smile, especially in the beginning, and I also prefer the looks and caractetizaciones of the characters.Although somewhat exaggerated form, is not wrong that in adverse times where it is believed that everything can be solved by dialogue, let us remember that the man has always been Hunter and warrior, and there is sometimes no choice but that fight. |
1,878 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2566 | Albert Puyuelo | Morirás en 3 días | 2 | 5 | muchocine | It feels a bit that its director, Andreas Prochaska, has not been willing to risk a single frame so the tape can exit Austria towards all the countries who have read the manual Hollywood slasher. | The youth of today, in the slashers, die as in the 1980s. With a pair of knives, some screams, suspect one shade and adding a touch of gore, the formula still stands. Now comes another which follows the rules, but from Austria. Few films produced in this country come to light, and it is missing see more films filmed in their beautiful landscapes. This is one of the strengths of die in three days, give us the opportunity to make tourists looking at the scenario in which they occur quite ugly facts. Among the enormous mountains, and by a rather cold Lake, youngsters finished licence receive a message on the phone who tells them that they will die in three days. First is it do not take very seriously, but everything will change when one of them is killed.Starting with this approach, which could resemble the of call lost by Takashi Miike, the film features five young people with the same personality that may have an ATM. To the press a few buttons, activated accordingly. The surprises that holds us to die in three days are very few, not to say that you do not exist. As one of the characters says "why three days and not four?". Exactly, what does. It is a one-way argument, which begins well, but spent the rest of the film showing the same once again. It feels a bit that its director, Andreas Prochaska, has not been willing to risk a single frame so the tape can exit Austria towards all the countries who have read the manual Hollywood slasher. |
1,879 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/682 | Marta | Pequeña miss sunshine | 4 | 5 | muchocine | A film fun, entertaining, beautiful and sometimes humbling, provided that the Viewer is able to tolerate the lack of verisimilitud of some moments. | For some reason, the supposedly independent or independent - films - American typically arise in their stories around a group of atypical characters that interact in some way (usually, forming part of the same family). "Little Miss Sunshine" is no exception. Provided that you do not hate that - absurd dialogues, surreal situations - style, you can find very good works, as this road movie, which invents nothing new, but what counts, it has well. "Little Miss Sunshine" has a family trip to California for the small Olivia, 7 years, may participate in one of those grotesque children's beauty pageants. IE: a girl with glasses and teeth of rabbit (that Yes, very funny), a father obsessed with success, a grandfather who have missed the residence by his fondness for drugs, a suicidal uncle, a brother who did vow of silence and a mother more or less normal in a damaged van in which there is to climb up because does not work the first. This narrated with agility, so that the result is a film fun, entertaining, beautiful and occasionally humbling, provided that the Viewer is able to tolerate the lack of verisimilitud of some moments. They could not miss the dramatic touches, but that Yes, in its fair measure. Dialogue tío-sobrino facing the sea and the final escenita of the contest are perhaps too cloying moments, but cannot get tarnish the rest that will like to enjoy - like me - the ingenious comedy with curious characters and little moralina. "Little Miss Sunshine" has been lucky enough to get covered by the Sundance film festival, but I do not think that you stay long on the screens. At least, in cities such as Zaragoza. Take advantage and go to see it, it is worth the trouble. |
1,880 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/85 | Iñigo | Cache Escondido | 5 | 5 | muchocine | When the soil of the past begins to open beneath our feet... | Haneke, one year after another, is dedicated to hitting the conscience of the spectators. Us pokes in a brutal manner, to the point of asking falter and that we not feel practically the soil that keeps us upright. With "Cache" would not be otherwise. On the basis of a formal basis apparently more classic, simple and minimalist, Haneke, away from explicit "Funny Games" but staying close to his already established personality in the same or in the brutally metaphorical "the pianist", again may trouble us with his criticism, but aseptic stories at the same time, against human morality.Although apparently the film does not contain visual violence of previous works, if we desenmascaramos the true content, discover that violence, even though contained, is much greater. We will then receive a terrible punch.Haneke, in pure and State more full of fullness that ever has been sweeping across Europe, festival by festival. As is the case in his films, has not ceased to puppet head. To lead in the delivery of the Academy Awards of 2005 European film, which did not breathe any of his opponents. Took home five awards, among which were the most important of the event (best film, best director, prize of critique,) best actor.No doubt, Haneke was tired of collect both Prize, anyway, after acknowledging the good make one of the most interesting directors of the impoverished current panorama. At this point, it goes without saying that Haneke has devoted his entire to think hard about consciousness, morals, hidden violence and the status of the human being.Such reflection probably reaches, in "Cache", its maximum expression. The Austrian director makes observer grouper, and challenges us to a game: the guessing game. Puzzles that lead us to our own nightmare, the most horrifying fear which nests in our interior, terror to know who we really are.You don't even need music to start to recreate his personal nightmare for mood torment to which subjected us, which will be reaching truly unspeakable levels of tension. It does not need theatrics to achieve the distressing development of knowing what will happen to become something almost unbearable. From the first until the last minute, Haneke does not give truce. It keeps us in a terrifying suspense that does not break. His game has caught us, and we have no chance to return back. As the Bible reads: "perhaps we have finished with the past, but he is not finished with us". Therefore, if we want to play, we must receive much. We ache it, because it is difficult to know who we really are, know us to ensure something, or say that our past is clean.Because "Cache" primarily talks about the ghosts of the past. It is true that it uses a common thread (rather, Mr McGuffin) which is nailed to the of the "Lost Highway" by David Lynch. But, despite that both deal with the subject of consciousness, they take very different paths.While Lynch was based on the psychological torment and consciousness that haunted his character by earlier acts, Haneke makes it the same way but giving a tour of the screw which opts more towards morality. Towards a moral that we believe have lost, but that really is not the case. She is there, hidden, to remove the head slowly and haunt us by our dark past. Therefore, the challenge of Haneke is based on excuses. The director wants to play with us to the impossible. The impossible from the point of view of the placement of the camera which observes to Georges (or would do so with ourselves, in the same way), that is nothing more than a non-existent trap. As impossible as it receives at home tapes that increasingly reveal more about his past. No one is really sending them. What Haneke wants is to see what is happening to us. And so let us consider ourselves. He does not want us to say who sends them simply because that is something that we have to discover ourselves. And know that the videos are actually, our memories. Something abstract, purely metaphorical, and physically non-existent. Then, by very insurance that we believe to be our Throne, we know that our most terrible acts are always waiting in the deepest.We are sure to live a completely normal life, without bumps, without past crimes to justify a present so strange and oppressive. But Haneke is responsible for calling into question and get the innermost reality of us. It deals with hitting the slap in the face to the well-to-do bourgeoisie so you wake up once and for all and is able to see what happened and no longer deny it throughout his life.Spit what in the deepest of himself knows that it actually nests, while in everyday life it not even remember.Guilt haunts us continually, and, therefore, fear (is not a terror to the use, is the fear of the simple every day) is something that accompanies us to each corner. He gets up into our dreams and takes us by the hand to perdition.With a stunning montage and a simple address (sometimes reminds us a home working) but prodigious, Haneke brings together two great actors that perform two monstrous interpretations: Juliette Binoche and Daniel Auteuil. The film exudes a nearly exhausting sobriety and an atmosphere superb and necessary to get what you really looking for: overwhelm the protagonist, and thus the same Viewer. Because, ultimately, what pursues is let into question our supposed good morals when making a difference between social classes. World of difference which causes rejection and avoids recognize him, since some stripping of all others to be able to taste its so comfortable and settled life.A manipulated life, in essence, by the distorted information offered on television. A means which only opts for the side that fits him best. It is indifferent if wars occur, suicide attacks or if the victim is really that appears. As we do with all of our decisions in pursuit of achieving a future accommodating and quiet. Bypassing who is necessary.But, sooner or later, as much as we want to deny to ourselves and preach all our kindness and life so exemplary that we have conducted, will end up turning against us. US attack to unstable most of our being: consciousness. And guilt will end harassing weaker than we have and what we sincerely want most: our children. We know it or not, so we go from generation in generation. And the ball will grow. To an extent as inevitable as frightening. Conscience, in this way, is as if he heredase. And if we do not understand, it still there, hidden, noting, as aseptic but cruel as ever, so our descendants her suffering and her suffering. Until that we realize what we have caused. Us or those who come later. If someday come to do so. Reality, very hidden that it is, is the most hard and cruel that we may never attack. More than any punch, hit or shot.Therefore it is not a visceral punch, that judges, discards, deletes, or decides. It is a punch that observes, analyses and gazes. That compels us to us to decide and to reflect, without position on any side. And it is, in essence, the kind of punch that hurts most. It's the blow of the weight of the conscience of the past that us seeks and makes us tremble to the point of not feeling the ground beneath our feet. It shows the fear to be observed and analyzed by our actions and decisions. The fear to be judged by this, to be persecuted until our destruction. To be persecuted by no one else. by ourselves.Since then, the rest of the world of cinema, especially the vaunted of United States, should kneel before the evidence that "Cache" is the best of 2005, that the work of Haneke is cinema in its purest form, and that gives hope to the rest of topical works that flooded the celluloid and make viewers seeking new concerns are plunging, increasingly, in the deepest of the disappointments.But, as usual, not everyone will be willing to play the game of Haneke. You can not cope with it. This is something that also understands the director, as also understands our human condition. Work teacher Michael Haneke. |
1,881 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/390 | Ivan Sainz-Pardo | Descongelate | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Good comedy Rodeo, kooky and black humor that works in his dramatic gear as a real clock. | Where this good Spanish cinema? Here, escondidito, unnoticed, without Titanic promotions or Fireworks, but it exists. "Descongéla_" joins with the costumbrista trend more Almodóvar, but also with the quality as our director manchego tapes it is customary.This is a smart and fresh, tape with a few players in State of grace, a careful ambiance and a production full of loving care and professionalism. Agustín Almodóvar sponsor a unique film per year, this, without a doubt, she deserved. Black, paranoid, humor with intelligent dialogues and a wonderful cast. A Candela Peña talented and totally wonderful. Grandson, pulling very well, at best, as always. Loles León, reinterpreting its role, that's what makes it of fear and a simply mythical Jaenada. The rest, to the height, which is the height of the same sky, and the movie that, although he could have even a little more pitched in the comic part, works in his dramatic gear as a true clock, finally to be a good comedy Rodeo, kooky and black humor. |
1,882 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2171 | Patri | Piratas del Caribe: En el Fin del Mundo | 2 | 5 | muchocine | The film is pretty long, and until it makes its surreal appearance (best film) Jack Sparrow becomes a little heavy. | The third part of Caribbean pirates is a cierre(¿?) worthy of the trilogy, it replied to questions that was left in the air in the second part. Entertainment and fun are guaranteed, thanks to the great performance by Johnny Depp, with his unique style makes the Pirate Jack Sparrow one of the funniest characters I've seen ever, is only for him worth seeing this film, although at times it may be a little child. Completely opposite is the performance of Orlando Bloom, as deadpan as always, is clear that his presence only serves to the delight of quinceañeras and fans.The film is quite long, and until he makes his surreal appearance (best film) Jack Sparrow becomes a little heavy, then the story takes place with a frenetic pace and the plot becomes confused and tangled, as happened in the second part, there comes a time when it is not known who is betraying who, or what characters are in a ship or another. You can enjoy quite seeing this film, although it is clear that it is not a great movie and that there is really absurd and pathetic, scenes such as the wedding on the boat. |
1,883 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2221 | Ramón Besonias | Piratas del Caribe: En el Fin del Mundo | 2 | 5 | muchocine | This feeling of audiovisual gazpacho has just a crematística and nothing artistic motivation. Verbinski, under the tutelage of business of a financier of the divertimento as Bruckheimer, has made the duties that have sent you. | When one is witness to the spectacle (no doubt) is the new release of the Walt Disney Studios Motion Picture Marketing and Distribution (most his partner, Jerry Bruckheimer Films), do not know very well if he has attended a film pirates (unorthodox, of course), a circus got ginkana, one of Laurel and Hardy, a surreal comedy to what how being John Malkovich, or even a naif love story. And it is that this incursion at the end of the world is also the step to the self-sufficiency of a producer who knows a priori winning. Why does the script come something secondary, which has just taken? from the hand of the tanned writers Ted Elliott and Terry Rossio (Godzilla, Shrek, the mask of zorro) - a wise choice of genres and disparate characters, extracted from the imaginary child to potential clients (children and not so children). This feeling of audiovisual gazpacho has just a crematística and nothing artistic motivation. Verbinski, under the tutelage of business of a financier of the divertimento as Bruckheimer, has made the duties that have sent you. And it has done well, and shamelessness. To Caribbean pirates 3 he notices too its Lair by the box office, and its security to sell a product that before leaving already exceeded expectations to rich to their producers.Why 3 Caribbean pirates it crimp its plot, allowing clonadoras licenses with schizophrenic speeches, or pirate rollingstonianos pirate code and the musical memory of parents who accompany their children to the rooms (or is the other way around?) And the conundrum of his script is supported because it comes sprinkled (as almost all the American cinema of rapid consumption) of an audiovisual earthquake that desencaja the eyes of the respectable and keeps quietly in the armchair, swallowing their popcorn and sipping the usual ration of syrup made in USA. Out of the room only it will be what we saw, i.e., mere smoke of sounds and colors and a few good euros less in their pockets. And to continue swallowing Fireworks artificial life are two days and finance and death do not forgive.With Pirates of the Caribbean 3, Spider-Man 3 and all its cousins is presented to us a little encouraging film our cinemas menu for who would have liked to see other titles equal or more juicy hanging in poster and more packaging (see Zodiac, among dozens more), and only finds prefabricated dishes that although they seduce at first glance, become later kitkats that kill the bug that one has good film (or if perhaps cinema) (to dry), and not digital sets retreaded by experts in marketing.Anyway, see you in the film (or the amusement park). |
1,884 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2393 | Hombre Lobo | 28 semanas después | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The first ten minutes of tape, when the infected take stormed a hut where a group of survivors takes refuge, are masterful, intense, asphyxiating. Unfortunately, any time the movie is at the height of this first scene. | How good (or bad, who knows) zombie film is that it is a very popular genre that entry has more or less guaranteed success. It is ironic, however, that recent tapes of undead fever has its origin in a movie that came out not even mobile corpses. And it is that while 28 days later (2003) exploited all the codes the film popularized the master George Romero, his creatures were not reanimated bodies hungry for human flesh, but humans infected with a rare virus that made them killers irrational, mortíferamente fast and without any notion of piety or intelligence. Its director, Danny Boyle, managed to create a small but effective Legion of fans about his horror indie tape, so a sequel was expected. Well, four years has been slow in coming, and this time 28 weeks later (2007) came wrapped in great expectations. They are justified? Yes and no.In recent months there has been much of this sequel (directed by Juan Carlos Fresnadillo Spanish this time), and even before opening already were many who claimed that it would be superior to the irregular part. Some even have seen him as well. Unfortunately I must associate myself with the opposite view. While it is far from being a bad film, the truth is 28 weeks later is not a tape too remarkable. It is not only better than the first, but even made me wonder if I was not too hard to judge its predecessor, at least without being a great movie, had a unique style, and despite falling in repeated plot references to the then trilogy romeriana, knew offset with a truly original aesthetic (although for the most part was product of its technical limitations). On the other hand, the amateur look of the first part has disappeared in the film Fresnadillo, pointing more towards action and the sample of those details that worked before. but now in big.First the good news: the first ten minutes of tape, when infected take stormed a hut where a group of survivors takes refuge, are masterful, intense, asphyxiating. Unfortunately, any time the movie is at the height of this first scene. On the contrary, once it comes in the fabric of American soldiers taking control of a solo London, tape suffers a considerable downturn. Once the virus springs back between the population and the chaos it seizes the American control zone, we are seeing a repeat of the first part, only to desganados and cansones schemes. Unlike what happened in 28 days later, this time the characters are much less interesting (which makes it more difficult worry about their survival), especially that interprets Robert Carlyle (actor who, ironically, refused to participate in the first part), whose development over the plot is implausible and inexplicable to say enough is enough.What we have between hands is a banalized exploitation of the first film, and while it is true that contains some good time, also shows points too many deaths, too many plot holes, too many turns without explore and, above all, very little interest in "taking the pulse" of their characters. There has been some critics who wanted to see some parallel with the situation of the American soldiers at Iraq in the history, but I frankly do not see this relationship by any side. The presence of the army of the United States see more as a move by the producers of that country to seek the attention of the public house, because the truth is that the nationality of the occupying force is absolutely irrelevant. And is that in the background that is the problem of the entire film: everything is so inconsequential, so irrelevant, so "of manual of style", really, there is nothing to do highlight tape, as it's not its action scenes are actually a calque of its predecessor, as well as other movies like The Crazies (1973), to which reference is made of little disguised form. To make matters worse, the end has little claw, although for very different reasons for the Danny Boyle.Es film a well-made tape, undoubtedly, and worth a viewing, provided it is accepted in advance that we have one of the under the year releases, and not the film (with capital letters) zombies of the 2007. |
1,885 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2510 | Tito Chinchan | Ghetto | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Film about one of the Nazi ghettos in Lithuania during the occupation of the second world war. Very interesting to see, with its point of tension is maintained and that ends up exploding you in the face at the end. To know that you can cry. | Several very weird things have happened with this film. When he was preparing the critique, I searched a little bit of information and I have encountered there is almost nothing. For most, this film does not exist. On the other hand, and this is not so unusual, the official synopsis and of what I think is the film have absolutely nothing to do. In the poster leave the same actors, if it wouldn't is another. In the end.The film is about the German occupation of Lithuania, specifically of a ghetto under the command of a young nazi officer. In its effort to maintain his plot with the greatest possible encouragement (and the Jews to do productive actors) to have a good coexistence decides to reopen the theater, so that all Jewish artists can follow their performances (and incidentally not amtarlos). On the other hand, a clever Jew, opens a business with the nazis to repair the costumes coming from the front. And I swear that the film is this.Well, look at it did me not do much see this movie, I do not like those of penalty. But found me this very interesting. Input, is not a film especially hard, if not runs with a kind of calm that makes you expect the worst. The setting is "curious" without large decorated, but sufficiently effective (most of the action takes place in the Theatre). The characters interpreted roles very different and strange, being the peak of all the girl puppet.In short, film about one of the Nazi ghettos in Lithuania during the occupation of the second world war. Very interesting to see, with its point of tension is maintained and that ends up exploding you in the face at the end. To know that you can cry.kisses. |
1,886 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3473 | Francisco Bellón | Michael Clayton | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Michael Clayton is a conventional thriller Yes, maintains interest and suspense, but of a gelidez such that fails get excited at any time. | In recent times have been sprouting like mushrooms with political dyes, some better, other worst thrillers, but this proliferation is in itself good news. And it is that of intrigue and suspense film has reached an impasse in the original ideas are conspicuous by their absence, and all films resemble others, or directly are crude copies.And unfortunately, despite the good appearance that conveys, Michael Clayton recalls in some respects to Erin Brokovich, by Steven Soderbergh, which is executive producer of the Tony Gilroy film. This and other handicaps, as the film begins practically with a flashbck, drag a story that on the other hand, neither manages to thrill altogether. It is a well constructed plot, although there are some details there is no who is created, which is well narrated despite some ups and downs in the pace, but completely sterile and unable to convey any emotion to the Viewer. If the film last man standing in is partly by simple curiosity of what will happen, and despite the initial flashback. It is true that the story gains in intensity in its final stretch, but what has kept it standing at this point is the work of the actors, among which stands out a brilliant George Clooney and a Tom Wilkinson.Michael Clayton incomensurable is a conventional thriller that keeps Yes, interest and suspense, but a gelidez that fails to excite in no time. Nor is it an original story precisely, but fulfills the role of divert and entertain the Viewer. |
1,887 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1314 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | Noche en el museo | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Film devoid of ambitions beyond the healthy divertimento (very healthy) and some complicity with culture as a pretext. | Sandwiched in a suit of divertimento teenager or child, the film can entertain adult audiences, but I doubt that someone with true goer interest go to see it except that he carried the troop of kids, children, nephews, neighbors or the fourth primary class. Night at the Museum meets more than its playful task: there is a dazzling special effects-generous serving, a fast-paced script and a self-assurance, in general, welcomed in these times of very thought cinema even when recipients will be children (the hood, the Shrek or the Nemo were animated artifacts of dubious child affiliation because transpiraban nasty adult on many sides).Shawn Levy, before we knew by the Pink Panther or twelve at home is responsible for this film: moves by ground Subscriber, know the trade of Carpenter's fair attraction. We cannot demand you what you demand to Martin Scorsese or Todd Solondz. Levy joins this segment more genuine household consumption-oriented film validísimo: everything is festive, everything is left lead by mansa political correctness and, moreover, the script (which in its simplicity cela varied records and proposes a wide range of readings) gives a suggestive look through the history, although it is history walk at home and not to inquire beyond the greetings of the Romans or the rudimentary gestures of the men of the caverns. This simplistic pedagogy not abounds in cinema for children: at the exit of the film, one he explained to another that the Romans had a "terrific" army and that mammoths and dinosaurs (in its entendederas) had never coincided in the history. As it can be. The case is that a film, one without excessive pretensions of sustainability, had raised so sparsely regular dialogue that already only therefore by this unprecedented counterpoint, everything worth and not we could, with sincerity, battered so wise reflective exercise.Sad consequence would be that culture was by these filters yankees of popcorn and massive blockbuster: culture comes from other sides, or must come from other sides, but night at the Museum, at least raises a dialogue between reality and fiction that aims to link the more frivolous fringes of that culture, its limbs, but why not (in these times of libresco decay)(in general) less important.Ben Stiller makes great what he knows: putting faces, give his comic bis in generous portions. This poor father in distress delocalised worldwide, needs those nights in the Museum so that her son will take into consideration: this cheap psychology plus not disarm the fabulous fireworks of special effects when all the wax museum figures brought to magical life and campan at your leisure, anarchistic and stubborn, carrying their topics to hilarious ends: there is a scene (the best, no doubt) in which the night guard Larry acts as a psychoanalyst of Attila and makes it cry like a kid. Fresh air, missing makes.And if you don't have nephews, sons or relatives to young who give a great bit of film, you go. Perhaps not regret at all and leave rejuvenated as when those Saturday morning sessions made him feel that the world was perfect and it didn't get fooled by a story. A good: an absolute llena-cines (never on a Sunday morning session I have seen the film to which come so full, so alive, so full) |
1,888 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3041 | Caty | Mystic River | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Great movie, highly recommended and will be in the annals of the seventh art as a classic. | Three kids, Jimmy, are and Dave are playing in a typical street of a worker suburb of Boston when they are interrupted by a policeman (or what looks like a police officer). The man furtively teaching a plaque, waged to friends by be writing their names in the wet cement of the sidewalk, telling them that you have to take one of them prisoner. After asking them where they lived, the man decides to take to Dave, this is which lives further away and thus will have opportunity to tell his parents the acts of vandalism that is dedicated to his son. Jimmy and they can do nothing and are limited to observe as the car goes away with a Dave inside, that not to look back, to his friends. The man, who was in fact a pedophile, for four days is dedicated to abusing Dave in all imaginable forms while keeps you locked in a hideout. Dave manages to escape, but his life will be marked forever, as well as their friends.This is the start of Mystic River, Clint Eastwood film based on the eponymous book by Dennis Lehane. Eastwood is like the wines, which as it ages grows its quality. It is also an example of how a star, after a successful career as actor, chooses to be behind the camera to direct their own films, made in the style of their mentors Don Siegel and Sergio Leone. With Siegel, he learned to make films quickly and cost-effectively, filming you need and maintaining an organized set. Leone, Eastwood absorbed the more artistic side and his tendency to tell epic stories. Brings together a great cast: Sean Penn, Kevin Bacon, Tim Robbins, Laurence Fishburne, Laura Linney, Marcia Gay Harden., and not only stayed in directing this excellent cast of actors, but that he was also in charge of producing the film and - surprise - for the soundtrack.Twenty years later, the three friends back together under very sad circumstances: the daughter of Jimmy (Sean Penn), Katie, is brutally murdered. The police in charge of the case is be (Kevin Bacon), (along with a Laurence Fishburne playing his partner). To further complicate the history, the last person to see Katie alive was Dave (Tim Robbins), in a night bar with a few friends hours before his disappearance, and reached home late in the morning, with clothes full of blood and very scared before the puzzled eyes of his wife (Marcia Gay Harden). After so long, we excited Jimmy as the youngest of his daughters going to communion, but his daughter mayor Katie will not just appear at the ceremony after a night partying with her friends, Sean is shown as a competent policeman who has been the only one to be able to flee their old neighborhoodleft six months ago by his wife, it is called every day and stays silent, listening as are tells their concerns and what he has done throughout the day; Dave appears as a good father and husband, because quite recovered but still very marked internally by the hell had to suffer during the four days of continuous abuse in her childhood. It is amazing as an actor like Sean Penn, which began as a rebel of the American cinema in films of low budget and low-quality film, it has become over the years an interpreter solid, firm and which is able to transmit us the intensity of Jimmy, a father whose daughter has been murdered. Tim Robbins, as always, sublime, count with the guarantee of at least a certain quality, and Kevin Bacon, is to make a film already eternal supporting actor, this film is probably the best performance of his career.Make special mention at the end, full of tension and metaphors, wondering what would have happened if instead of getting Dave twenty years into the sinister car, Jimmy had been or are. Great movie, highly recommended and will be in the annals of the seventh art as a classic. |
1,889 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/624 | Kiko de España | 13 tzameti | 4 | 5 | muchocine | What Hostel could not have been, why the Eli Roth is a comedy and not. A recommended movie. | Calmly, so takes it the first third of 13 Tzameti Géla Babluani first feature film footage, until it enters the same hell.The movie plays in the same league as Calvaire, for instance recent and criticisms that can be seen in the poster are a bit exaggerated, but it is very good. Sébastien is a looser that earn the living fixing roofs and while he arranged one on the coast, the owner of the House dies and Sébastien finds a letter that quoted the deceased in a place.Not (believe) nothing to lose, Sébastien moves towards this place. There is also a touch Haneke in the film, but above all, much classicism and a great and noir band sound. |
1,890 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1558 | Rafa Ferrer | Yo soy la juani | 1 | 5 | muchocine | The film tries to get their dramatic touches, which are much more pathetic than usual, and is that Juani, dear, life is not rosy. | Personally the film has seemed a sovereign pain, since the music (trying to sell a soundtrack where are groups that do not interest me at all), or interpretations; Maybe a little Veronica Echegui, since the "Canto del loco" Dani Martín, better to be devoted to sing, so that it is acting leaves much to be desired.How beautiful is the SMS language, that that pisses off the language of Cervantes to become an unintelligible gibberish, where this girl, attached to their parents (away from teenagers of today, which ignore, Brats altogether in their most hidden ignorance).The film tries to get their dramatic touches, which are much more pathetic than usual, and is that Juani, dear, life is not rosy.In short, I imagine that this film will end up selling alongside "7 virgins" in an inseparable from the best film ever shot kinki pack. |
1,891 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3938 | Ramón Balcells | Deseo, Peligro | 5 | 5 | muchocine | A virtually perfect film that runs media consciousness human to provide us true and cruel portrayal of persons, whether in China, Japan, America or any other country. | A flawless sequence of scenes without apparent connection opens the charismatic Taiwanese director Ang Lee's new film. With a simply perfect title and an atmosphere more minimalist that grandstanding, I wish, danger is a mixture between the absolute cleanliness and perfectionism worthy of classic films from spies and a rude but elegantly hidden love poem murky between two opposing sides that come together, and not by fate. After several and varied films without any resemblance, Lee gives us a majestic exercise in suspense to the Hitchcock and one of the most suffocating relationships seen in recent years, with a constant (which not fast) narrative that ends up dazzle us with an anthological ending. This is a tragedy about the limits of love, as something purely pathetic violence and two people who just define themselves in unsuspected. The story, which could well be put at any other time and place, is a thorough and leisurely journey through the insecurity and the coldness of two opposite points that collide and cannot be separated with a simple goodbye. Certainly some similarities can be found with the previous and also splendid Brokeback Mountain, as that so desired and forbidden love which is however dangerous. Yes, referring only to this subject possibly dealt two virtually identical films, but I wish to, danger goes beyond the human personality and explores something as it's shockingly evil. It is a film of contained emotions, which uses not extravagantly tear musical elements to show us hard images. It is, therefore, a heartfelt film, endowed with perfectionism (his aesthetic is unbeatable) and that employs, on a couple of occasions, the master of the aforementioned suspense film. We face a masterpiece that comes closest to the classic American cinema than to the Asian. Moreover, if we changed the language and the country we would be faced with a purely American-style movie. And this is not a bad thing, on the contrary: Ang Lee has had enough courage to develop it in a place outside that is used to shoot and have as a result one of the greatest achievements of the past year. Although perhaps their excessive duration (more than two hours and a half) not allow reached pure perfection, but that, probably, is asking much. Both Tony Leung and Wei Tang (the two main characters) are splendid, giving us two of the best performances of recent years, absolutely credible and very human, despite my difficulty to understand its so contained Act, form which does not mean that it is, or much less, negligible.A film that acts as a spy in a poem of tragic love, camouflaged among the apparent simplicity and minimalism to finally be uncovered and be discovered as something terribly great. Its slow pace allows you to look in a sublime photography Rodrigo Prieto and the musical pieces of the always impeccable Alexandre Desplat, by not forgetting a script that stands out for its elegance and precision, even though it is so extremely dramatic in their last two scenes (master the flat end). Ang Lee has stripped (never better said) as never before had done, leaving a virtually perfect film that runs half human consciousness to bring us a faithful and cruel portrayal of people, are China, Japan, America or any other country. Without doubt, a film incredibly universal, deeply dramatic. |
1,892 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2431 | Rafa Ferrer | La boda de Muriel | 2 | 5 | muchocine | One of those movies that seems that lifelong living and that labour costs one sit down to watch. | One of those movies that you know from a jug of time ago and has never stopped to watch, it has been today, when a colleague has brought the (already descatalogada) DVD Edition and to insert the disc and start listening the first bars of "Dancing Queen" by ABBA, when I do not know very well why reason, I said let's see it!Toni Collette does here the work of his life, the film that you gave the fame (indeed, there to see the kilos this lady, has been removed appears to an Australian version of "Rosa de Spain"), in this "modern" version of Cinderella, passed through the sieve of the tragicomedy more deep and that at times even has touches of more scurfy film of our sesentera Spainhe accompanies Collete actress Rachel Griffith, which we have seen among others in "To 2 meters under the ground".And it is strange as a time to this part for women marriage is no longer one of its main priorities is no longer exists that mundane obsession dress white lives our protagonist, and even in some moments the film seems to be years light of the most recent events.Pity that you have some sweet and sour notes, and a rare final sense, go, a very broad and open end that one unfortunately has to take care.I can not stop me not to mention the soundtrack of ABBA, where the theme "Dancing Queen" is repeated many times, fails to tire, which is what has the mythical group nordico, that one can listen to the songs several times and not feel sick at any time.Ultimately, one of those movies that seems that lifelong living and that labour costs one sit down to watch. |
1,893 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4267 | Rafa Ferrer | Alien vs Predator 2 | 1 | 5 | muchocine | It is shit on a stick, without argument, without effects, nothing worthwhile. | If I am sincere this second delivery nor called me the slightest attention, and has been a partner which has nearly pushed me to see her, he didn't have an excessive by the sequel curiosity, although it is true that although I followed the project, I've done almost of mere observer, without get involved therein, and want the most minimum see something embodied on screen.Without a doubt, make a sequel to a "Crossover" (mixture of two sagas) with two such emblematic characters of the FOX sci-fi film seemed a sovereign memez but friends, the box office manda. And well, repeats the same formula, flavored with cinema entertainment or action, so you can call both forms and it is very nearly the same, so we have the aliens without Lieutenant Ripley (replaced by a mother, military profession with a girl in his charge, hehe as "Aliens"), look at her I have been throwing less during the hour and 20 min. footage and on the other hand the predator, what happens, that more than one them was budget?In the middle to a bunch of suckers who wish that they loaded sooner are simple, stupid and mindless to the more not being able, go of those when you are loading you say!SIIII FIESSSTA! that look that stupid tiparracos made in this kind of films, there is never any that you feel more or less identified, apart that I do not know very well why reason, much of the tape reminded me to "Transformers" from Michael Bay, silly boy, aunt buenorra, bugs, and other crap, only missing the "Rubick cube".The argument should be in half page, also his screenplay (in the rest of surplus page), the actors are to kill them (hehe) and refiriendome to the "superoriginal" phrase of the poster, where if that could hear my screams (or almost) has been in the room, cursing, first to my companion, and then all those morons that spent their money to see the first part and we have punished with this second, as well as in the fight scenes, among so much darkness (perhaps to protect the tape of Screeners) fails to appreciate nothing, and one out of every scene more confusing fight that.In short: Is shit on a stick, without argument, without effects, nothing worthwhile. |
1,894 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4282 | Heitor Pan | Doce hombres sin piedad | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Sydney Lumet does something as complicated as put the camera and ignore it, without incendiary rhetoric or elevated speeches, only a group of men current releasing ordinary phrases. | Already for a long time it not eating a serving of classic cinema, so on the desktop of the Sunday, I decided to dispense with the Technicolor and taste a jewel of trials in charge of Sydney Lumet and his political cinema film. This is the theatrical "12 angry men".To be a copy of cinema of convicts, rooms and presumed guilty, begins in unusual way, just in the last step of the trial, when the jury retires to deliberate if the accused in this case with a possible murder in first degree to their backs should be found guilty and worthy of the death penalty.It is to this jury who still camera will be installed next to them in a small meeting room on a sweltering afternoon, to passively attend its deliberations. What at first seems a mere formality in a case of course, with plenty of evidence against the suspect and several witnesses, is prolonged by the doubt of one of the members, reluctant to send the boy to jail if you don't see things absolutely clear and without a hint of reasonable doubt.As the film progresses, the only participant in the discussion that from the beginning raises the first question - a huge Henry Fonda - will try to reason with the other details of the trial. Various personalities will be coming to the fore portraying a small sample of the society. Prejudice, quick-tempered men with shy types, various social strata and different ages should be to agree on a man's life.In the middle of the 12 men, two stand out for its clarity of ideas and exposure of the same, each on one side, while to his around the rest is changing opinion, realizing that it is not so easy to send someone to another neighborhood where one must be completely sure of his guilt. Reasonable doubt starts to bite in the minds and the minds of the group.The film is almost a play, with a single scenario, a small number of people and dialogue who intersect, overlap, cut and fight around the life of a boy. Although perhaps over time it has lost some of its initial strength, it remains a calm and accurate plea against the death penalty, trying to demonstrate that even in the most crystalline trial there may be dark spots that send an innocent man to the electric chair.To do this, Sydney Lumet is something as complicated as put the camera and ignore it, without incendiary rhetoric or elevated speeches, only a group of men current releasing ordinary phrases. There is a hero who convinces them, nor nor a villain willing to cause death, but rather questions, experiences and little defined feelings that intersect.A simple movie in structure but with a great work of script, of those that were made by famous directors such as Robert Altman or (I hope not receiving death threats after this absurd comparison) the first films of the now somewhat desnortado Kevin Smith, full of dialogues on which slides narration. Perfect for taste unhurried a Sunday afternoon. |
1,895 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/87 | Sonia Esteban | Fragiles | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Balagueró should consider a Spanish cast of good quality if you don't have money to hire outside | Yesterday I saw "Fragile". I must admit that I am an enthusiast of Balagueró since I saw "Los Sin Nombre", with a fantastic cast and an atmosphere so suffocating that it left me colada to the sofa throughout the film. "Darkness" also I liked, and caused me that pleasant feeling of fear will not let me sleep in peace, feeling an invisible presence next to my bed.But "Fragile". buf, I expected much more. And he did it because this director me has been accustomed to a quality that does not match yesterday. Calista, undoubtedly, makes me laugh when I do comedy, but in this role is very "plastic", I never feel her real, but playing a series B horror film, which I believe was not the goal. I do not know whether by fault of the direction or the own talent of Calista, but the truth is that there are some details that bothered me enough. For example: when she begins to destroy everything you need at your table, I felt so incredibly unreal that he only managed to make me laugh, taking the "drama" that was supposed to broadcast the scene. Later, can someone explain me what makes a floor full of dust and crap on top of a hospital plant? It does not seem credible. Not to say that they had to hire a replacement for a couple of days to deal with 6 children. I expected much more, the truth, and maybe that is what disturbs me and dislike. Perhaps, if this film had been directed by someone else, I had overlooked errors.In short, neither many scares, many novelty, a rather mediocre player (fails 100% transmit your Chemistry with the girl protagonist) and some details out of site. I liked, that Yes, the scene of the lift. I suffered with poor children who break the bones. Besides, nothing. I think that Balagueró should consider a Spanish cast of good quality if you don't have money to hire him outside. |
1,896 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1341 | Rafa Ferrer | Frankenstein de Mary Shelly | 3 | 5 | muchocine | A movie that could have been much more and is, sadly, in much less. | Yesterday, and thanks to Digital + (well, thanks to my pocket than the pay.) could enjoy a feature film which is for my all a pending issue, and, I had a time seeking the tape by videoclubes and libraries without success, finally ended up owner and école! (as stated a mio teacher of the school), yesterday, without coming to tale ended up visionando.Kenneth Branagh famous to adapt to film over and over again the works of his countryman William Shakespeare, composed here a film where the lead takes Robert De Niro, Helena Bonham Carter, and Ian Holm, and where Branagh elongates in excess footage, being sometimes very heavy his viewing. If that a little unes you of drowsiness when it comes to see her, are facing a perfect tape for snooze on the couch.On the other hand, the ambiance, the costume and photography are excellent, even makeup De Niro turns into the famous monster who earlier gave life on-screen Boris Karloff, however, an extreme slowness, a slow and heavy way to go to the heart and a predictable skinny end please make the production of the same.The score Patrick Doyle composed for the film, gives notes both gothic horror and a perfect sound for a tape of these characteristics, it seems here Branagh has been able to choose the appropriate composer.In short, a film that could have been much more and is, sadly, in much less. |
1,897 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3333 | Ramón Balcells | Saw 4 | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Saw IV falls again in the topical to disguise that craving so gore of the director. Incredibly painful, a hodgepodge of care. | So bad and predictable as I expected. There is no doubt that the third part of the saga Saw was already a tremendous insult to the film. It will be terorífica and what you want, but his scripts are truly abysmal. Saw IV falls again in the topical to disguise that craving so gore of the director, to cover these murders of unpleasant consequences and give them a little more than felt. The characters are poorly described, the reasons of Tobin Bell (right, above all) to cut these people are ridiculous, especially seeing how are tortured, way to exageradísima and vomitiba. And it is that I have no desire or reason to dwell more. This fourth and unfortunately not last installment is just as bad and unpleasant as the previous. His argument is pathetic, and with its end just feeling embarrassed. And I have no doubt that I alquilaré the first, not only by the critical acclaim that he obtained, but also to get out me the idea that the Saw saga is one of the worst made insults to the movies latest. But, without a doubt, the fourth is incredibly painful, a hodgepodge of care. |
1,898 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3696 | Rafa Ferrer | Hitman | 1 | 5 | muchocine | One adaptation of one video game so forgettable, as little appealing | I admit, without any notion of shame that the Rob Cohen film, starring Vin Diesel "xXx" is one of my recent action films that I like and that I have seen in more than one dozen occasions; nostrae is also true that this, as it is today, it was going to be also starring Diesel, but this at the last moment poured back for (anda amidst in the filming of Hannibal, which seems to have no end), and producers and others, before the expiry of them license to Eidos (the creators of the game) had sold them to move your character to the big screen, they decided to find the worst possible substitute, this is none other than Timothy Olyphant, that certainly looks bad face, nor takes on screen the pimping and ill-favored attitude that the character needs.Is also true that the shadow of Luc Besson, producer of the film here, it is elongated and that whiff to Action Center-European cinema accompanies the film and her goes so far as to burden at times, leaving aside the action made in USA who may need to stay in a laughable experiment once more, based on a video gameone can not do than sigh and murmur that the suffering lasts as little as possible.Xavier Gens, director frances of the tape seems to care little character, and in this, his first film is dedicated to walk in any type of situation seen earlier, and Hitman goes from being an agent to the most pure style 007, a mercenary of Stallone, Schwarzenegger films and even Van Damme in his best days.There have been peeled ass watching tapes of action like thumbs in hundreds of video games first thing worth (the latter is not my case) to verify that the tape of Gens is not among highlights of the genre, with an argument so sosamente bad faced (perhaps a calvo, aiy and with a bar code on the back of the skull is not locatable)that one wonders as noses someone, with 2 fingers of forehead can give you a bit of verisimilitude with reality, by my videojueguil this is, and is not enough to put a picture of the game so we see that it is.In short, that I do not want to extend in excess, one adaptation of one video game so forgettable, as little appealing. |
1,899 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/778 | Sara Rodriguez | La fiera de mi niña | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Work very thorough and aesthetic who inherited many things of the silent film era, a few gags incredibly disparatados, entanglements absurd, misunderstandings and confusions, reinforced by a few as well elaborate dialogues that is difficult to forget them. | Shot in 1938 and starring two major film, Katharine Hepburn and Cary Grant, "The beast of my girl" (Bringing up Baby), was not a box-office hit. In fact, Howard Hawks was fired by RKO and Hepburn, which at the time was considered "box office poison", after having invested in the film and renounced charge for this film (the conditions placed by the producer when they agreed to make the movie), was forced to buy his contract. Although in the end not he went so badly that the tape was reporting him benefits until the day of his death.With "The beast of my girl" they were already two times that Grant and Hepburn were working together. They had already agreed on "La gran aventura de Silvia" of George Cukor and would recur together with other fun comedies as "Live to enjoy" and "Philadelphia stories" of the same director. But this time, the two would be part of another example of films go unnoticed, even to fail at the box office, but that eventually become cornerstones in the history of the cinema. This course is one of the most famous of the time in its genre.Okay, is a comedy (or to be more exact, a "screwball comedy", name given to the crazed comedies of the 1930s), a quite undervalued genre today, and Yes, is white and black, which will cause more than one an allergic reaction and a sudden attack of drowsiness, but this is not one comedy any. For me, it is humor with capital letters.Tells the story of David Huxley (Grant), a paleontologist that luck smiles: just found the last bone that was missing to rebuild a Brontosaurus and a spinster millionaire is willing to donate a million dollars to his Foundation. In addition he is about to marry his Secretary Alice Swallow. But suddenly appears Susan Vance (Hepburn), a crazy girl that puts his life upside down (with the help of a Leopard named Baby) and that will prove to be the niece of his possible patron.Apparently history has nothing out of this world and still we have not forgotten that is in black and white xD, but is that Howard Hawks really knew how to make movies and to check just need to take a look at his filmography with great titles in genres as diverse as comedy, westerns, war moviesscience fiction, film noir or musicals. All of them are characterized by the unmistakable personal touch of Hawks, who used to say things like:-"I have ten commandments to make a movie." The first nine are: do not get bored!.-"A good movie is based on three good scenes and no bad".All this makes it's not hard to imagine what we will find in this film, after its simple appearance hides a very thorough job, an aesthetic which inherited many things of the silent film era, a few gags incredibly disparatados, entanglements absurd, misunderstandings and confusions, reinforced by a few as well elaborate dialogues that is difficult to forget them.Not in vain Hawks had worked as a screenwriter and knew who surround themselves. Another reason why is considered an exceptional director is the unbridled pace of his films. He himself used to say that they unfolded 20% faster than the other productions of the time, something that we see in "Bringing up baby".Finally, we must not forget master interpretations has the film, which is by far one of their strengths. Katharine Hepburn, after testing it was one of the best dramatic actresses of his time, register and shows that it was also a comic actress of the first order. In addition, combines perfectly with the charismatic Cary Grant, who despite having gone bad considering having some scene close to the Leopard (in fact refused to appear with him), he used no double coming to perform some that other acrobatics in the final minutes of the tape and stars in unforgettable moments with Hepburn. Surely anyone who has seen recalls the song that you sing to the Leopard: "Everything you can give it less love you babyyyyy."Maybe that one can put some but to the "special effects" or the filming some scenes with a stuffed Leopard, but come on, there is nothing that can not forgive taking into account that it is a film of the 1930s. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.