Unnamed: 0 int64 0 3.88k | id stringlengths 44 47 | autor stringclasses 181 values | title stringlengths 2 71 | rank int64 1 5 | maxRank int64 5 5 | source stringclasses 1 value | summary stringlengths 9 396 | body stringlengths 352 24.4k ⌀ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3,000 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2964 | Rafa Delgado | Happy feet | 5 | 5 | muchocine | A surprise and a breath of cool air (never better said) that is eternally appreciated in these times of green ogres throwing farting and burping and several plagiarism between studies. | Despite their ups and downs of rhythm and some sequences that contribute little to the argument (but a lot fun) as seals or killer whales almost to the end of the film, 'Happy Feet' has fascinated me from beginning to end.For the first time in an animated film, I forgot while he saw that it was just an animated film. I have forgotten to fully concentrate on how it was the script and other gilipolladas which only more Geek-lovers as I or those who read me pay attention, so I simply spent big, have left me carried away by these penguins so perfectly well recreated, and her have enjoyed as the smallest child: from the Warner Bros. logo. until the last of the closing credits.And I appreciate that. A lot. A surprise and a breath of cool air (never better said) that is eternally appreciated in these times of green ogres throwing farting and burping and several plagiarism between studies. And above with a fucking great environmentalist message. |
3,001 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1866 | Iñaki Bilbao | El hombre del Oeste (The Man of the West) | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Excellent western which, in his day, was misunderstood by his plot ambiguity, as well as for its violence, bursts and quite stark and cruel. | "Arizona, 1874." Link Jones, former gunman dedicated to banditry, is today a man regenerated and happily married. "So much so, that the community in which he lives he has commissioned hire a new teacher, for what Link has embarked on a journey by train equipped with six hundred dollars".Excellent western which, in his day, was misunderstood by his plot ambiguity, as well as for its violence, bursts and quite stark and cruel. But it is a good film, strong, dynamic, Yes, somewhat dark and particular. The characters are never a piece and all have a dark past. Scathing and acerados dialogues, embaucadora photography and, above all, an unusual staging for what is forced if it is projected by television, full screen format, something that almost never happens. Well Gary Cooper and especially Lee j. Cobb, in an abject, huge role physically and as an actor. |
3,002 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3246 | Tito Chinchan | Supersalidos | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Film about the search for alcohol "open pussies" three mindless American teenagers. Very good start, very good final lyrics, a heavy result that leaves one rather than bitter aftertaste. | I told to my medium Zucchini that if came to the cinema to see "Superbad". Stayed you a face so wanting to send me to hell, but as if everything he wanted to leave at the same time. Come on, a jam in the larynx, which when it desatascó already was on his way in the film only to Xuxa (which says the girl is not with men that do not use condoms). And is that wanting to lead a mother to a film where one of the first words that say "chocholechelandia" is complicated. Very complicated.The film is about two pre-university friends who see as ends his life of the Institute and want to wet the churro before. They are not precisely the archetype student player of the football team, if not rather the prototype of follower of Onan or pajillero, as they prefer to say so. Even with these falls them from the sky the opportunity of a lifetime, one of the girls more buenorras of the "AUL" which wants to go to his party. And now incidentally, who get alcohol. Thus have no choice but to resort to another friend, with more expensive panoli even if it should be, which has a false card.Had not read more than good reviews of this film, it may well be about as bestial promotion, but the thing well painted. And Yes, the first time wasn't bad, with million words profanity, extreme lumpiness, and even a moment in the history of the cinema, which is when extracts the notebook of drawings of Phalluses. But from there, you get bored of having the "cock" in the ear, "pussy" in the nose, and the "blowjob" in the mouth, and already do not know nor as sit in the cinema. Luckily he had the room for me. And it is a film of humor so long becomes desperate. Especially when this American teenage humor is not that what is more grace makes me. Luckily I could detoxify at home with one of Mariano Ozores, than if not.In short, film about the search for alcohol "open pussies" three mindless American teenagers. Very good start, very good final lyrics, a heavy result that leaves one rather than bitter aftertaste.To me me bored.kisses. |
3,003 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2661 | Enrique Colmena | Los Simpson: La Película | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Finally, for enjoyment of the simpsoneros, who are legion, there are film. And fortunately in film we are given the same who in the television series: fun at the expense of ourselves. The fact that the series is already two decades occur is not a mere coincidence, as you can imagine the reader. | Finally, for enjoyment of the simpsoneros, who are legion, there are film. And fortunately in film we are given the same who in the television series: fun at the expense of ourselves. The fact that the series is already two decades occur is not a mere coincidence, as you can imagine the reader. Said the classic you can deceive few for a long time, and many for a short time, but you can not fool many for a long time. "The Simpsons" are certainly the most influential series of the history of television, and his humour acid, corrosive, sarcastic, but at the same time tender, human, emotional, it has become popular in several generations of viewers; because it is a serial that also reaches children, adolescents and adults. Moreover, I am of the opinion (do not always shared?) that adults savored more crazed this lower-middle-class family humor and the landscape and form surrounding her.All of this is in "The Simpsons - the movie": criticism of the established powers (do with this President Schwarzenegger which is descacharrante nothing more than the mere enunciation that could reach such a high judiciary; of course, after seeing George w. Bush to serve in such a position, anything is possible: maybe even Schwarzzie does it better?), messing about citizensboth high cradle and low bed (do heaven, look like Cecilia?), distribution of tow right and left, without anyone to be saved. And all this with the frantic rhythm of any of the great nearly 400 chapters so far manufactured by the calenturientos brains of Matt Groening and company. I said: a joy. |
3,004 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2242 | Ramón Balcells | Diario de un escándalo | 4 | 5 | muchocine | A very good movie, with well designed details, a right direction, a wonderfully elaborate script and above all, two amazing actresses that make the best performances of his career. | Helen Mirren was superb in the role of the Queen in The Queen and unfortunately I have not seen Dreamgirls to be able to assess the performance of Jennifer Hudson in his supporting role aclamadísima. Both actresses were the Oscar as best actress and best supporting actress respectively at the last Oscars ceremony, and I must admit that the first deserved it. Yet and so, if this award would have taken him Judi Dench for her role in diary of a scandal I would have pleased even more, because what you get with this performance is nothing more than achieve mastery. And the same applies to Cate Blanchett, in one of the most superb interpretations of this attractive and amazing actress.Patrick Marber is the writer of the film, which was also nominated for an Oscar for his more than correct work. As I say, the script from diary of a scandal is good, but what stands out here are interpretations of Dench and Blanchett, a few creations of magisterial stature with human sensibilities, and above all, a few personalities incredibly perverse and Bohemian, respectively. Their looks, their dialogues, its moementos peaks (especially of Dench, in a truly terrifying final performance). Not is that the role of Cate Blanchett is worse drawn or tried, but there is something in the Dench that attracts me much, and I do not know if it is that loneliness that is maintained and that perversity with which wants to catch things. The Australian is a more normal role, with its temptations and prohibited relations, and also, with their doubts and fears. Ultimately, perhaps the veteran winner of an Oscar for Shakespeare in love if you're here real Oscar, but Blanchett (who won for playing Hepburn in the Aviator) gets, practically to its height, with some extremely intense dramatic explorations (see the discussion in extremis with her husband, a phenomenal Bill Nighy). It makes me weird to speak at the beginning of a critique on the interpretations, but we should recognize that this film which truly highlights are two. Although obviously in a film not only can well be interpretations and else be bad. Here the address of Richard Eyre is more than correct, the screenplay of Marber is very well structured and the music of Philip Glass is simply moving. And not to forget the magnificent photography, carried out with elegance and colours very ochre and sometimes very gray tones. The truth is that everything in diary of a scandal works, not perfection, but yes in an appropriate manner, without exceeding at any time and always enjoyable proving, and, as in every movie of expendable, with superb moments and others not so much (the confrontation of Blanchett against journalists, somewhat forced).A very good film, with well designed details, a right direction, script, no Oscar, but itself superbly produced, a credible and oppressive atmosphere in several moments and above all, incredible two actresses that make the best performances of his career. Unforgettable in the interpretative sense. |
3,005 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3337 | Tito Chinchan | Trabajo basura | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Film about a guy who hates his job and when he wants to lose it is promoted and hipervalorada. Nice Comedieta, but little else. | Working trash won't be to the (ass, ass, ass) annals of film history, but made me laugh to see that geeks are everywhere. In addition to the evolution of computing, which seem to having the film less than 100 million years. Retaking of geeks, from where come these types that scary but anyone throws? They entered the building overnight, killed one and sat on your site? I think that more than one happens not a psycho, but they are, hence giving the key. See if the normal are them and I I am not more than meat of psychiatric hospital.The film is about a type that works in a boring Office, in which the Chief putea le to limits by all known. Total, that the boy in the middle of a therapy psychiatric stays mesmerized and his life changes. Decides that life is to be happy and gets the world by montera. Happens to go to work, is it linked to the waitress who liked him amounting in the Corral, the world upside down that they say.Tad rare if it is, but can be seen. On the one hand, elected characters have their dotted, in particular who was dismissed 5 years ago but are still paying you for a bureaucratic error. Of those in my company there is more than one, that the day be lifted will be the revolt of geeks and laugh you comecerebros zombie. The argument continues more or less easily, but if they wanted to make a comedy is could have left behind some scenes that amuerman a lot. Oh, and when ceases to be hypnotized? By the way, the neighbor mola.In short, film about a type who hates his job and when you want to lose it is promoted and hipervalorada. Nice Comedieta, but little else.Can be seen, but without large risotadas.kisses. |
3,006 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1853 | Tito Chinchan | El reino de los cielos | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The film I liked. Incidentally, it teaches us that religions have caused the biggest savagery the planet has ever known. Thank God I'm an atheist, but go disappointment. | I don't understand why they don't more movies of these Moors against Christians. They have all the ingredients for success, and is also clearly who are the good and the bad. The bad are the Moors and Christians the good. Or not? For Westerners this is so, and vice versa for the Oriental. And it is on issues of religion, there is no good nor bad, but nerve and deceived.The film is a blacksmith for coincidences in life, loses a wife and their employment in a heartbeat, but beat a father (who fought with an arrow in one testicle, had to say it). By more coincidences of life, the father goes to the Crusades and our Orlando Bloom (has name mixture of tomato and insecticide) followed as a faithful dog. Traveling to Jerusalem, to try to defend the city, and their lands, the evil Saladin and his army of Saracens. When it comes to town, realizes that that the Saracens are the bad guys and the Christians the good, it is not at all true.To tell the truth, the footage of the film is a bit excessive. Put another way, is long noses. The film is not bad, but since what interested us is fighting espadazos and not the love of our bisexual Orlando, us is a little peñazo. And is that these films are always cut by the same pattern. Presentation of the characters, reporting from the scene of the final battle skirmishes to go to focus the subject, roll and more roll on the human and the divine, and finally the final battle. And then there is a sort of corollary on life and death. And that is all. Sinvergüeza Trojan, El paso, the Lord of the rings, etc.In short, that the movie I liked. The final battle is the cane, although it has for me a little mistake. If know perfectly well where are the most fragile defence parties, because they do not attack her at the beginning? Do you like to see dying loved ones? But good, except this little problem, the film shows us wars "santas" so much damage been done. And incidentally it teaches us that religions have caused the biggest savagery the planet has ever known. Thank God I'm an atheist, but go disappointment.Besitos.P.D: Leprosy is a disgusting that not we as imagine.Pd2: At that time life was exactly the same as a dog cagarro. That sad.P.D.3: I think that Orlando is left with the desire to give a meneón the Saladin. Not be I if behind the scenes not are they desfogarían. |
3,007 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4090 | Rafa Ferrer | Million Dollar Baby | 5 | 5 | muchocine | We have a great masterpiece of our time. | Before I write anything, the first thing I will do is say that the film contains a "twist" from the 100 minute of projection, but, as I'm not such a bad person (despite what some might think) not desvelaré it here, so anyone who wants to know more, you know.That being said (and eye to my detractors, since I'm going to talk about more things than usual) Clint Eastwood has proven to be a solid director of actors, as demonstrated with "Mystic River" and "M$ B" does so masterfully, estetíca the film is little more than A C O J O N A N T E images they come to let "sediment" in the spectatorin the 1st 100 minutes of film are witnessing the birth and subsequent redemption of a promising young boxing and a "coach" makes possible (not wanting in advance) by his pupil to achieve what is proposed. Some plans, parts of the script and gestures of the actors do and get that you are "hair like hooks". But there is that which will. !!Much less! In the last twenty minutes (with the twist that I did not desvelaré) Eastwood takes the film far beyond what one expected, demonstrating that it is able to tell two stories in one, and leave us after the opening credits with the mind crushed by the moments lived in the armchair. Also Mr.Eastwood (which already seen older) composed the score, directs, acts. !!We are going Juan palomo, I me him stew, I I the as! And if to this we add the excellent interpretation of Hillary Swank and Morgan Freeman!We have a great masterpiece of our time! I hope that the Oscars are favorable to him and win all the nominations which is nominated. To that you expect to see? |
3,008 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2341 | Rafa Ferrer | Shrek Tercero | 3 | 5 | muchocine | More of the same with another role; that if there will be 2 more tapes and a spin-off of the cat. | Once I entered cinema almost dragging the feet, promising myself that, in case of not like me nothing what I was going to watch endure with sovereign masochism until the end of the projection, no complain, no make aspamientos, and without cursing or to Dreamworks to make this Green Giant machine of making $$$.And yet!I enjoyed it as a dwarf! And it is that this third installment of the adventures of Shrek, follows the line of the previous, is true, and I apologize if I repeat, one can not go to see this kind of films seeking a minimum of sense or transcendental seriously, because we have a comedy that parodies the fairy tales of lifeIs there something more fantastic than that on the face of the Earth?We must thank to tape a good dowry of comedy, and like gets, without too much drama that we can break us laughing in some tragic moments of the life of Shrek, and it is that for a server death of Bambi, or of the father in "The Lion King" Simba (the latter being already quite more talludito), managed to have some "resentment" towards Disneyby torturing us with tran dramatic events.Since then, Shrek is worthless without their usual, side from Fiona, until the cat (now that I have a minimal, I have enjoyed more than the presence of famous feline on screen), not forgetting me ass, and the Prince charming; that Yes, seems a little "led by the hairs" that add pirates and Galleons as who does not want the thing on screen do perhaps a strategy to amass more pa$ ta drawing the pull of the Pirates movies?Something I said to leave the cinema with my companion (my wife, as usual) is how much they have improved in animation from the first film (dated 2001) and that digital animation refers to one year to another we see big advances in the visual field, and but that is to say Pixar, which has become his "Ratatouille" become one of the most eagerly awaited (and envidiadas) films of the year summary 2007.En accounts, I don't want to stretch me more than you need, a tape that is worth going to see with some prejudices and so, surprise, since if you expect surprise few (if not none) you'll find more of the same wrapped with another role; that if there will be 2 more tapes and a spin-off of the cat. |
3,009 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1417 | Tito Chinchan | La ley del silencio | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Peliculón with capital letters, those that can bring to the modern public to the classics. If we also aderezamos her with the controversy of its director Elia Kazan during the witch hunt, and Marlon Brando more handsome that might have been, because already we have everything. | The film has a special magic as well we know, but if us intent to see what lies behind each filming, each manager, each actor, probably part of that magic would disappear. Many actors have been despicable, the best shooting were a hell and the directors have not been better. Fortunately what we have left is his work. In this film, peliculón, rather, is a reflection, even a yield of its director. Shows how an informer is good and that it must fight for what each considers just. Respectable, but opinion.The film is a former boxer Terry Malloy (Marlon Brando) who loses his key match, so it is sentenced to work for a gangster who is in control of the most important port in the world. Kill without any tapujo any teamster who wants to denounce him, which is why Terry has become involved in a murder. From meet the sister of the victim, and a wrestler cure for freedoms, began a process of transformation to overthrow the Empire that has mounted the underworld.There was a time in which the players were expressive in their faces, their skins looked like tanned in my battles and his gestures allow us to glimpse a richness of life. This film is one of that style. Each of the characters, up to the secondary, has interest and importance in the argument. We'd like to know more about them and we realize quickly that represent real people. The port setting is very successful, with a very good picture. Marlon Brando acts as the gods, and that it is difficult with such a good actor. And the argument has it all, everything you need to be one of the best films of all time.In short, peliculón capitalized, of those that can bring to the public modern to classics. If we also aderezamos her with the controversy of its director Elia Kazan during the witch hunt, and Marlon Brando more handsome that might have been, because already we have everything.To buy the Tin of the Fnac, that adds nothing, but it looks good on the shelf.Besitos.Momentos to remember: ** the opening scene of the jump of the paloma.* the end, with a Marlon Brando finishing what they started. ** the conversation with his brother in the coche.* the scene that comes by force in the room, to show their amor.* the harangue of the priest in the puerto.* the struggle for work, humiliating workers if necesario.* is when you enter at the palomar and discovers that his admirer he has killed all the pigeons. |
3,010 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1590 | Florinda Chic | Invisibles | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Bardem, away from the ephemeral flashes and vacuum couché, has produced a film to give voice and image to victims of conflicts forgotten or neglected by the media of communication. | Javier Bardem does not conform to the photo of rigor in the refugee camps rigged in ways of Colonel Tapiocca or holding a bowl to a dying on the Bank of the ganges, not. Bardem, away from the ephemeral flashes and vacuum couché, has produced a film to give voice and image to victims of conflicts forgotten or neglected by the media of communication.In doing so he has worked with Médecins sans Frontières and has convinced five filmmakers to make two separate short films about ignored problems of the third world: Wim Wenders, Isabel Coixet, Javier Corcuera, Mariano Barroso and Fernando León Aranoa.El result is invisible, a film documentary that far from being film of evasion, is cinema of invasion - of consciousness. Isabel Coixet has focused on Chagas disease - caused by a parasite that causes mortality in Bolivia. Javier Corcuera still trying some underprivileged in Colombia trip to recover their land seized by armed groups. Mariano Barroso shows us the paradox between health and money that occurs with a very profitable drug to cure sleeping sickness and all business marketed as inhibitor of the growth of hair.Wim Wenders shows the heartbreaking testimonies of Congolese women who have been raped by militias and guerrillas of the country and Fernando León de Aranoa try to shine in the eyes of children who sleep in shelters in Uganda fearing to be recruited in the night and be converted to paper soldiers.With exposed, nobody will eat some popcorn seeing this work, shocking where there them and very far from pseudo conscience assaults more Hollywood as blood diamond, the constant gardener or Babel. The latter seek also swell their coffers and here there is no famous actors or special effects, or romance, or chance. It is raw and hard reality. Bardem, who could well have been dedicated to designing men's fragrance, allocated profits from the film to Médecins sans Frontières. For that reason, alone worth this binge of injustice that feel like a slap. |
3,011 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/560 | Plissken | Los Borgia | 2 | 5 | muchocine | The feeling I have is not of anger, but of sadness, "another misspent cartridge". A 4, because the director strives, at least, get a good job. | Antena 3 has done again it. It was not enough with this series of Santi Millán paparazzi or the bochornazo of 'Them and the weaker sex', not. Do I had to invest 10 million of? in a miniseries (I hope, already speak of the topic later) on the intrigues of the family Borgia in Rome from the 15th century. And release in film, to give more cache.If this is the future of directors like Antonio Hernández, go side by here. 'Los Borgia' account the turbulent events that surround the family Borgia from Xativa, since the appointment as sumo pontiff of Rodrigo, the Patriarch of the clan, until its fall in disgrace. An history comparable to the Corleone (Mario Puzo acknowledged being inspired by them for his legendary saga), and that could be real game on-screen is reduced to a faint story about the corrupt power of the Church of the time, and the war of interests around the Vaticano.Y all due, in my opinion, to two key factors:-The role of the strong man of the clan (Cesare Borgia) falls on Sergio Peris - Mencheta, young actor from the quarry of 'to get out of class', which gives a lesson in why not all actors can do a role. It is not so much that it is bad (to me seems it, yes), is that it is an I want to and I can not constant, it is unable to hold the movie by him. If the election was conducted by the producer, already okay them; If it has been bet the director, has ruined all the prior work atmosphere, photography, documentation, etc., because everytime Cesare Borgia appears (and almost always appears), is going to the Horn the dramatic tension, historical reenactment and everything. Or some efficient side (Poncela, Dechent,) sometimes Lluis Homar can save all the function-the script: Antena 3 has been prepared, I bet whatever, a miniseries of at least 4 hours, that perhaps makes sense as Chronicle, but of course, how are brand new in film four horazas of historical volume. So I guess he asked Antonio Hernández to use scissors to leave it in a reasonable size (sounds les play?) for what is the style: two and a half hours. Are the beginnings of the Borgias in Rome? No. do develops the love story between Caesar and Lucrecia? That is Intuit, vale. What about Jofré, the "Fredo" in the family, and Sancha, his wife? Apparently, it is not relevant to the Viewer. Go, and point. Total, understandable part, and a sindiós at the end.The feeling I have is not of anger, but of sadness, "another misspent cartridge". The production is acceptable, but by the standards of the television, the national and current, say. Nothing to do with 'The rogue' or 'Fortunata and Jacinta', for example. And with the cinema less. A 4, because the director strives, at least, get a good job. |
3,012 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3043 | Francisco Bellón | Mataharis | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Icíar Bollaín tells us a small great story full of force that moves the Viewer by its veracity and the simplicity of the Mise en scène. | Spanish Cinema of quality this year is shining by their absence to the point that becomes really difficult to draw up a list of the five best titles of 2007. It is ironic that some of the proposals that would fall in this list would do it more for the rest than on their own merits demerits. It is also the less shocking that several of these films are operas materials, and even more in a year in which filmmakers have released as Gerardo Herrero, Imanol Uribe or July Medem.Esperemos that in the coming months the picture dates, and the turning point can mark it Icíar Bollaín with Mataharis, a story of three detectives fighting for revealing the non-secrets and keep yours safe. But to confuse anyone, Mataharis is not a film of intrigue, full of glamour and conspiracies, but that it is a realistic portrayal of the situation of women workers in our country. The great script would have worked just as if instead of detectives they were journalists, for example. Icíar Bollaín reflects with great realism, the problems faced by couples and especially women to reconcile their professional lives with the family, even more so if there are children from through. Donostiarra filmmaker tells a small great story full of force that moves the Viewer by its veracity and the simplicity of the Mise en scène. You have had three different at the same time stories without any stay lame would not have been possible without the excellent work of mounting with Mataharis, since at no time the tape becomes heavy, or lapses the interest by any of the characters. The interpretations are all worthy of applause, but it is impossible to not highlight the three protagonists who do superb work characterized by its sobriety and restraint.In Mataharis, Icíar Bollaín returns to claim as one of the best stories of the Spanish film counters making a film very consistent with what feels society in our country. Undoubtedly, one of the best titles of the year. |
3,013 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2948 | Enrique Colmena | La Jungla 4.0 | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Are what were thinking those responsible for casting when commissioned to that role to Timothy Oliphant, an actor what dan rather than fear eager to cuddling him? | How easy it is for the critical load a film like this "Jungle 4.0": is not a sequel, but quarter of a successful commercial saga but little depth in the movie fan class; director only has, so far, the diptych (soon triptych) of "Underworld"; It stars Bruce Willis, which in recent years almost all critics (myself included) are giving a somanta sticks by his declining career.But, if we do a minimum mental gymnastics exercise, the truth is that this fourth installment in a series continues to be a good commercial product, properly dosed in his constant "crescendo" of action seeking mass segregation of the viewer adrenaline (and, probably, of testosterone?), but with a decrepit, prematurely aging hero who has to complete his exploits with much pain and bloodin a sort of indisimulable, indisimulado, masochistic instinct that makes the protagonist detective alive its particular "via crucis" over thousand and one disasters that would happen. There are, in addition, some details when least curious: on the one hand, the fact of entrusting the role of director of the FBI, a man of power administrative quasi-judicial absolute, an Arabic features actor, albeit really New Zealand. Things, so we have the head of the Federal has a pint of moro quite striking, that, as it stands, I do not know if you consider it as a stroke of humor or, why not, an antixenófoba claim that should be applauded. The issue of the so-called chaos Total (theory that imagines an absolute collapse of all systems on Earth) is also interesting, although it is not particularly original, and even less in the literature (see, without going any further, the penultimate novel by Stephen King, "Cell"). But the tone of this "jungle 4.0", which announces disaster ("crack" software) which repressed in their own title Spanish, is acceptable, with a hero who is falling apart as it has to leave the face with bad, a teenage daughter with revolts hormones that he hates (not without some justification), and a pipiolo which will serve as an Assistant with a shawl of radicalism were more or less updated.Len Wiseman, director, confirms that it is especially gifted skillfully choreographed action fleeing from current trends to the embarullamiento that are destroying the genre; probably this could call virtue comes from his past as artistic director, but the truth is that he is appreciated that our pupils do not have to do extra hours to find out what is happening on screen in the ultraviolence scenes that are the mark of the House in this type of film. Do the grading of the action scenes remain some plausibility (always within the usual improbability of the genre), until, with the hilarious sequence of the persecution of the protagonist for the hunting, the credibility goes directly to hell, not to say another word of equal number of letters and stronger? We must also mention the evolution that the own character of John McLane has suffered in these almost twenty years since that premiered the initiatory "Jungle of glass" John MacTiernan. Then it was a slob with emotional problems with his wife (or ex-wife perhaps already: memory for such details do not ask me), but still a man facing life from "pole", if they may use me the car analogy fashion. Now, nearly two decades later, that mighty hombretón, with a considerable hair mata and wanting to eat the world, is a rickety cincuentón, that shaves his head to disguise their problems of alopecia, at the end of the path and already with the retirement next horizon. That muchachote has become a cynic, a skeptic cured of fear, two beings in a same body which, however, only unites them their aching suffering to defeat the villain and his bad relationship with his ex-wife and daughter almost ex. Speaking of bad: what casting makers were thinking when commissioned to that role to Timothy Oliphant, an actor what dan rather than fear are eager to cuddling him? Man, please, the supervillain of this fourth installment may not be a guy that seems to come out of "The Blue Lagoon"? Well, nothing, to see if we fix it for the fifth (do will have, to be sure: the box office does not lie?). |
3,014 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2614 | Tito Chinchan | Los Simpson: La Película | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The film about the most famous family in the U.S. has not followed the path easy to do a chapter of an hour and a half, but that they have gotten innovations that do not have seemed to me interesting. Even so, the result is good, but not outstanding as pretendiamos to see. | So many years waiting out the film the characters these yellow, and when he arrives, you realize that 90% of the jokes you seen in the trailer. Man, that is good that create excitement, which has created much up with false press releases, but not us destripeis the film before seeing her. If sold alone. In the end.The film is about a typical American family living in a typical town called Springfield. Pollution of the Lake has reached a point which is unsustainable, so the mayor decides to take action on the matter. But as always Homer, the father, cause a catastrophe, forcing the US Government to put a dome around the most polluted town of the country.FAQ, FAQ, deeply bothers me the film I see. It is not it that grace, something I made, if not me is feeling a tad sad. With how easy that was to make a long chapter, with many plots to assist the main reach fruition. And nothing more. That is what we wanted. But no, they have decided to innovate. And they have presented us a few decorated in 3-D when the series always has been flat. And not content with that, have mixed us two types of textures of life drawing, and a more realistic that not sticks. Otherwise, the argument is nice, giving a bit of cane to the Church, to the environmental situation and putting a peculiar US President that I hope that we will not reach never see in that position. But the issue is not over curdling for nothing.In short, the film about the most famous family in the U.S. has not followed the path easy to do a chapter of an hour and a half, but that they have gotten innovations that not found me interesting. Even so, the result is good, but not outstanding as pretendiamos to see.Spider Pig, spider ceeeeeerdo!Besitos.P.D: You still have good moments, like the pig above all.Pd2: And the brain of Homer, no doubt.Web site: the web is a total and absolute wonder, it shows that they have spent much in the promotion and they have been unwilling to let loose. They can be many things to make your own character. If the have not seen, already tardáis:http://www.simpsonsmovie.com/ |
3,015 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/855 | Ana | Borat | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Glad to have seen but I would not dare to recommend. | There is much of that laugh, but also cagadas unnecessary, literally. There are good gags. But also others, such as fight naked and break things, who dedicated much time when the truth do not have nothing again, then my particularly, do not give me much laughter. But the rest of the time makes you laugh things that you'd never think you reirías. Politically correct? is not.Baron Cohen agrees with his character till the last consequences. It has to do because most of the times only has a decision-making and otherwise would not work. The film is a pseudo documentary, or rather a parody of the documentary. But it also has a narrative fiction, but somewhat is loose.Try to offend many. Jews, women, homosexuals, conservative, homophobic. It is as if he wanted to cancel go against a group, going against all criticism. It works. Persons who confronts Borat really take the worst of if same, but there are times that they are innocent. As Pamela (Yes, the watchers of the beach). You would never think I alinearía to defend it, but what did it seemed really cruel. Actually just her I mention it because otherwise he would have to tell more of the film, and being a film of jokes, it is better to not advance anything. That if, if you suffer from pena-ajena, suffer much.See the advertising of Borat in the metro is really refreshing. Among the usual advertising bad taste almost always highlight film posters, but Borat's has. Bad taste with desire. And that is appreciated between posters who do not dare are increasingly similar.For my the bad taste that I left the movie happens whatever I laughed, glad to have her seen but I would not dare to recommend. |
3,016 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3182 | Dragon negro | 1408 | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Another adaptation of author Stephen King, which although isn't entirely bad, if that ends up being a film with a good base missed and a journey of insanity just for not being so. | Yesterday ended the Sitges festival with the film 1408, which promised much but that ended up being a failed attempt to deepen the descents to hell of its protagonist. A writer is dedicated to travel and write about various scenarios where there are supposedly ghosts, but never find any indication of this. Room 1408 in a New York hotel will be your next challenge, but what will live there will have nothing to do with its failed previous experiences and room will be turning into a nightmare from which they can escape. Another adaptation of author Stephen King, which although isn't entirely bad, if that ends up being a film with a good base missed and a journey of insanity just for not being so. The film proposes a character to which room ira undergoing tough tests to collapse it, strange, Ghost events from the past that will make his appearance, heat, intense cold, no possibility of escape, everything is fine but fails at any time transmit to the viewer the feeling of tension, claustrophobia and fear of should even make the mistake of let some other fright helpings which not is beside the point. It can be seen, but one expected something more from one film that promised to be at the head of the terror of this year.One more year, in beyond of Orion, I tried to follow a more precise as possible to the festival and everything that I've been watching, commenting on each film as best as possible and giving my humble opinion that I hope you have served for at least have a reference, then we coincidiremos or not, but that is another sing. |
3,017 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2906 | Andrés Pons | La hora fría | 4 | 5 | muchocine | A totally sleazy film full of surreal characters with an enveloping atmosphere. Ultimately a debut that heralded an acknowledgement a hopeful author with refreshing ideas that contribute to the genre of horror. | Spanish cinema has a strange talent at Miss to different directors that could well give a new approach to our formulas exhausted.One of the most bleeding cases is Elio Quiroga, who printed his particularism seal for a decade with the marciana photos.A totally sleazy film full of surreal characters with an enveloping atmosphere. Ultimately a debut that heralded an acknowledgement a hopeful author with refreshing ideas that contribute to the genre of horror that lives in permanent crisis in Spain. After creating the FANTASTIC FACTORY us gift authentic barbarities like ROTWEILLER or FAUST among other by-products while nobody presented an opportunity to the young director.After ten years of silence he returns to attack with a similar scheme film day of the dead of the great Rosemary. With a derisory budget that allows only you to shoot in a couple of sets, resolved with great skill which takes advantage of every dollar in some amazing effects to achieve their goal with the good management of space and great atmosphere.Among the interpreters only highlights the SILKE beauty seen in other productions of horror as e.g. Tuno Negro. 8. |
3,018 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2119 | Bruji | Tu la letra, yo la música | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Not convinced or lovers of the genre, which does not comply with the fundamental objective of the romantic comedies - which is to fall in love and fall in love with - reaching a fun ending that would be perfect if it had succeeded in create something coherent before the closing credits. | Atypical romantic comedy-free narrative pace of bland script and few pretensions, which culminates in a story in which two big stars of the genre operating under its discretion, evidencing the apathy of the director and torturing their detractors. Fortunately, out of the film, the viewer only recalled the music of a catchy song by Adam Schlesinger (The Wonders). The lyrics, as the movie itself, better forgotten.The premise underlying this film is commercially, perfect. It is none other than the meet in the film to two generations through music. To do so, is used to Pop!, an attractive group that had existed, would have caused furore in the charts of "Popularísimo", the mythical Albacete Popular Radio program. While for pre-teens girls claim, creates Cora Corman, a crossroads of Britney Spears Christina Aguilera, that might well belong to the contemporary Top 40. The strategy works, and the nostalgic ochenteros succumb to the video clip of "Pop Goes My Heart", clever way, it combines the dance steps of George Michael with the unmistakable style of Simon Le Bon (the more "Bon" of Duran Duran), the attire of the new Human League romantics with the shirts of parallel botonadura popularized the Soft Cell, and the close-up showing the exotic empty gaze of Spandau Ballet singer with the Chess Board that appeared on the album of Yazoo. Reasons, all of them, more that enough to support two hours to Hugh Grant.Pero, as nothing is forever, the powerful top ends, the musical magic of the 80 is reduced to brief allusions to the poetry of Stevie Wonder and portentous tours of Tears For Fears; and the harsh reality we face "the worst movie of this year and any other". And it is that you, the lyrics and I, the music, he fails the formula of the best romantic comedies, and spare you the main theme of the soundtrack of the history forever playing secret Limal.El if the constant is to prosper?Boy meets girl - sudden infatuation-terrible event that leads to an inevitable break - moments of sadness are recreated with a beautiful song-reconciliation - Happy End - depends on the capacity of those responsible for the footage to elevate the fussiness to romanticism, making credible absurdity. Just have to remember how a glove leads the rapprochement between the characters of Serendípity, the elaborate process of falling in love which fragua in have an E-Mail, the betrayal of a bet which leads to the breakup of somebody as Tú, the melancholy that surrounds the solitude in how to lose a guy in ten days, the spectacular reconciliation of secret admirer. Or what is the same, all those titles where, for very trivial to make the plot basis, the scripts have been worked. It is not the case of history that today we discussed, in which situations are implausible and enforced.The truth is that it is hard to believe that, even the writer of Miss special agent, has been able to conceive a few such regrettable dialogues, that contrast with the depth charge, fleetingly, grasping in the story, and that its failure could be due to translation tasks. In reality, we can only enjoy blur profile of a great woman who, because of a destructive critique, becomes a being of hipocondríaco and insecure, and the interesting comparison between a person and a song in which the music would be the first impression, the physical packaging, sex; and the lyrics, the spiritual content, the soul, love. A real shame that a so beautiful as a direct message is diluted so sloppy as tedious development, framed in painful couplets of fifth of primary papers.Paradoxically, the table of salvation, Grant, become stone that is tied around his neck. A fact that is often the case when consecrated actors are dedicated to "stars" in the shooting, ignoring the directions of the director. Do happened to the selfsame Brando in the disastrous rebellion aboard the 62 to Val Kilmer on so many occasions, and he has not able to resist in a role that? it was - you closer to Ewan McGregor in Moulin Rouge. Nonsense almost as large as that is committed to make sharing history with Drew Barrymore. Those who believed that it could not exist a couple less chemistry on screen that formed by George Clooney and Zeta Jones in Intolerable Cruelty, were wrong. We have seen that it is easier to imagine an "affair" between Fernandez de La Vega and Mariano Rajoy, one starring the four weddings and A Funeral and the Angel of Charlie.El result is a product that does not convince or lovers of the genre, which does not comply with the fundamental objective of the romantic comedies - which is to fall in love and fall in love -reaching a fun ending that would be perfect if it had succeeded in create something coherent before the closing credits.Before size goer chagrin, Relax,-who would say Frankie Goes To Hollywood - Relax. |
3,019 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3149 | Adrian Bravo | La antena | 3 | 5 | muchocine | I can not deny that the invoice is amazing and the work behind this proposal is worthy of praise, and why her qualify as good and I recommend it, but in my view have not chosen the appropriate means | Perhaps once have known to a chic @ of the @ which pensárais: go, has a beautiful respingona nose, large eyes that speak alone, a nice mouth but why is that not l @ see guap @? I met yesterday to one of those people: was the film antenna, Esteban Sapir, a clock precision of arduous and detailed post-production that needed two long years that he saw the light. A silent film in black and white, with a hypervideo expressionist style drinking directly from the sources of Mèlies or Fritz Lang (in fact, references to journey to the Moon or metropolis are fully explicit, not cut a hair. tribute and nod or easy plagiarism?). The action is situated in an imaginary city controlled and submitted by Mr TV, which has mesmerized the entire population in order to force them to buy their products and thus monopolize all commercial and social activity. In this city the world has lost the gift of speech, except the woman who uses Mr. TV to spread its message through songs and televised messages, leaving absorbed throughout the world. One of the workers of the villain realizes that everything can change if the son of this woman has inherited the gift of speech, since that could counter the Machiavellian plan of the evil Mr. TV to subjugate forever never to his people. The fable is replete with references, symbols and drawings that resemble other so many classics neonata cinema era, and this Esteban Sapir and his team make it with mastery. Some sequences have nothing to envy to others of Murnau or Vartov. The use of subtitles by way of comic but coated products movement which explains more than the action of the characters with light Dim and worn that offers black and white and the general aesthetics of silent film of the dawn of cinematography is his achievement Summit. Really are the film and not the story. The problem is that you needed something more to save all, or perhaps slightly less. A cut in its length of at least 20 minutes had sitting you wonderfully, and that the film lasts 90. In my opinion, the treatment of the image, the semantic symbolism and strongly expressive ideas that go flailing rapidly, gooey and saturate the Viewer, we are asked concentrating very much and there is no choice but to disconnect at times. The simplicity and roundness of the silent film no sight in the antenna, only its format, its wrapping. I can not deny that the invoice is amazing and the work behind this proposal is worthy of praise, and why her qualify as good and I recommend it, but in my view have not chosen the appropriate means. The short, or a series of shorts dose would have been better choice, even the comic I had done the antenna a reference work. When I cross again with the antenna down the street, most likely is that pass long and set me in the girl who buys vegetables that you may seem more feota, I will not deny, but is infinitely more attractive. EA. |
3,020 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1363 | Yojimbo | León y Olvido | 2 | 5 | muchocine | It is a film that achieved the opposite of what is intended to, and precisely does not do any favors to the people with Down syndrome. | There are films that I call "kamikazes" or suicide bombers. They are those which from its approach are intended to be bad, possessing the commitment of people who believe in it and still sign above for its quality in carrying out his death certificate. But her they sign in an industry which called as such.This should be the case. But the "authors" and "festivalitos" it gives them by giving awards and praise.This film shot entirely in La Coruña has a distant intention to make a tender and emotional portrait about two brothers, one of them with Down syndrome. And the truth is that the idea is original. And actor, Guillem Jiménez, is not bad. But the intention has not.At least in the film.The ability of the director lies in getting laughter trying to do something serious.Want to do a portrait of integration and propaganda at the expense of people with Down syndrome, but spared no mediocrity to write hilarious sequences such as the Civil Guard, the outburst exhibitionist?It is a film that achieved the opposite of what is intended to, and precisely does disservice to people with syndrome of Down.Por other side note the poor performance of Marta Larralde, actress who usually convincing in a role that does not follow guideline any falling unsympathetic, that does not have a "curve" defined nor justified and maintains an incestuous relationship with her brother.Gary Piquer making decent pimp (not lost the acting and the setting in scene of the robbery to his girlfriends shop) passes without penalty or glory.And already not me sequencing with the picture (is not illuminated, but alumbrada), mounting, etc?I am sure that there will be more than one person who would not be in the opening credits.One hour and forty and so many minutes. A recommendation for those who have to see her: Please id with the predisposition to see a bad movie that wants to be good (has won a few awards) and accompanied by look. And to have a good time, because certainly not going to see a movie complaint, but "Rain man" to the Galician. |
3,021 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1184 | Tito Chinchan | Evil bong | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Infamous monstrosity created by and for impenitent porreros. I suppose that to what makes grace must be very smoked, but I have to admit that you there were a couple of moments that made me laugh. Also leave women in leather dancing sexy dances. | The brain of a viewer of film must be reset, as well as computers from time to time. We got accustomed to a level of quality, that everything seems to be bad. Why there are people who, moved by the loving kindness towards his fellow men, record these things for the good of humanity. Thus, those who see it, restart critical vision and appreciate more what we usually see. Already happened with "As smoke is going" and I has become to go with this.The film is an apartment shared by four diverse characters, three of them linked by marijuana. With the money that gives the non-smoker only, one of the inhabitants of the floor buys a second-hand (calls Bong) water pipe, according to High Times Magazine is cursed and its previous owner died. Obnubilado by the beauty of the pipe, they place in the classroom after smoking it. The next day, after a delusional erotic festive sequence, one of the companions appears dead on the couch.My medium Zucchini slept in the titles of the beginning, just to see that marijuana plants out. Well, more specifically when I recognized you that it was Mr Chong (of as smoke goes). Well, the film falls or quality to call as well. The script is tremendous, showing us how a killer bong wants to dominate the world letting their smoke. All this allows us to end a patriotic talk that parodies big titles that I can blend them in criticism of this monstrosity. The actors are obviously more bad than dog meat. Special mention should be made to the special effects, which takes us back to older films of series B, was where the imagination it supplying everything.In short, engendro infamous created by and for impenitent porreros. I suppose that to what makes grace must be very smoked, but I have to admit that you there were a couple of moments that made me laugh. Also leave women in leather dancing sexy dances. |
3,022 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3691 | Rafa Ferrer | 1408 | 2 | 5 | muchocine | A good idea, excellent initial minutes and a lousy and mediocre development. | I admit, with hand on heart, that when I saw the first few minutes, I found not only disturbing, but also quite well done, also add that before had read me the story of S.King which is "slightly" based (there are so many changes, that one not sure if it is really so, or free, so free adaptation that only match the names and little else.).After the first minutes, that I agree with the vast majority of critics I've read, are the best in the tape, this falls into the clichés, even attempted, lengthening in excess that story we talked about earlier, put as many references as possible, from "The shining" and"Dante hell" all together, mixed but not removed, and where the only thing saved from burning is John Cusack, which knows how to act at all times making us see scared shitless that is on the screen.The rest, including Samuel L.Jackson (mere secondary, excecepción, but secondary.) are Jessi, pulling out mediocre, to tell the truth; Note also the compendium of special effects, could not be otherwise in this type of tape, the Lebanese Gabriel Yared's terrifying soundtrack, and the idea, which is good, but does not give to a tape 90 min. Do not ever think of why King put this story in the mini-series "Nightmares and hallucinations"? As a curiosity, add that in USA DVD of the film, it appears an alternate ending that nothing has to do with the one shown on screen (and which is not it better, let's say).In short: A good idea, excellent initial minutes and a lousy and mediocre development. |
3,023 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2379 | Rafa Ferrer | 28 semanas después | 2 | 5 | muchocine | The tape leaves the first part as something amazing (which it was) and this into something that could be and that wasn't... disappointed. | A priori, a weekly tapes that interested me the most and one of the summer that more desire had to sink the teeth, once seen my opinion may not be more unfavourable, and is that perhaps, moved or motivated by a longing and hope to be a sequel to almost as excellent as its predecessorthe direction of Juan Carlos Fresnadillo stays sosa, is lost in a thousand stories that we have seen in hundreds of times in this genus (zombies, gore, as you want to call it) and finally it ends up being empty and dull.To begin with, there are 2 things that have bothered me greatly (3 would be good but one of them I am sure they have no fault.), the first heavy and loud music that accompanies much of the footage is A melodic composition was not well, or that? On the other hand in most action scenes the camera moves so quickly that it is impossible to appreciate nothing, giving here and there, stumbled over and over again, the third is almost unbearable cold makes in the cinema in summer and which obliges me to enter always projection loaded with a sweatshirt, that given the summer temperatures it sounds like more dementia than something that can be done with clarity, ah! and that is the projection has fucked 2 times, but well, that's a bad lower right?I have to say that when I watched the movie images and I found the small Mackintosh Muggleton, sheathed in the shirt of the team of my loves, I felt a chill and said, for the first time Real Madrid not get in a film jam by Florentino.En end, I don't extend too, the tape leaves the first part as something amazing (which it was) and this into something that could be and that it was not. He was disappointed. |
3,024 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/550 | Ana | Nueve vidas | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Anthology of short stories interwoven very subtly. | Five years after "Things you can tell just by looking at her" [things you can only say looking at] Rodrigo García has a very similar film. "Nine Lives" [nine lives] is also an anthology of short stories which are interwoven but very subtly. Composed by tension-laden moments that through a fraction achieve show you a life. "Every woman is a universe". This film format is unusual in the manner of the collections of short stories and shares much of the intensity of their language. García participated in the scripts of Sundance lab and is an independent film because to major studios, like publishers, do not like risk.The premise of each story speaks of how we are connected to each other. A couple is reunited in a supermarket there is something between them, there is no room in their lives for approaching, and at the same time do not want to let go. A woman getting ready to enter the operations room download his anger with her husband, trying to get away to the nearest person in a difficult time. While "Things" is a film of disconnected characters; "Nine Lives" is about what that connects us to each other. And it does so using a direct language and dialogues with strong emotional loads. Underlined with intense non-verbal language, which is and can be understood.A character watches a documentary about animals and says that "this Lion look to the zebras." "But the truth is that the zebras were filmed 2 weeks later in another country." Not in this film. The story of each one of the nine players in a single take approximately ten minutes. And the shots are interesting, which means that they are carefully choreographed and planned to walk into a supermarket and a funeral. Also a time in which two couples have a conversation is ingenious and you can see all the characters because behind the couch where these sitting a couple there is a mirror. Long shots maintain continuity and created a peculiar rhythm. Although some of the texture of the film not term I like and I thought that it would be digital, but filmed in Super16.Este film was low-budget and seems that the escritor-director has won this cast based on complex and interesting characters for an actor. So many great actresses: Dakota Fanning, Holly Hunter, Glenn Close and Kathy Baker. Everyone wins. |
3,025 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3909 | Tito Chinchan | Pulp fiction | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Film made horns on two assassins and their interelaciones in a day's work. Considered by many Tarantino masterpiece. I do not think that it is for both, although it has moments that makes it worthwhile. | Director: Quentin Tarantino. duration: two hours and average, less na.Release date: 13 January 1995.Espectadores: 2.154.692 of human beings.This criticism is in response to a challenge that launched me the great Plissken. It does not much conversed with my brother-in-law on cinema and came to the conclusion that Tarantino I don't like, given that all the virtues that he told me in this respect, to me seemed defects. For example, the talks impossible that kept, in some cases seem nice, but do not seem great. Moreover, they are quite silly talks, as devised how call hamburgers in France. No, to such not term him understand.The film is about a series of sequences in the life of several people, without apparent relationship, but eventually all and each one of them have a link. This link is given by two thugs, Travolta and Samuel l. Jackson, and as is his work routine. Already imagine that if partele that legs, that if hit four shots to that, etc. On the other hand, we have a boxer that is before his last fight and this has to be a tongo. A girl who is the girlfriend of the head, a couple who wants to dock a cafeteria and some guys rather than complete the cast.Let's see, this jumbled movies will be genius, but makes me picha a mess. That suddenly leave one that was dead disturbs me. And this movie is made so. On the other hand, is full (that Nice expression) of dialogues to each stranger, on the more banal and absurd themes that you can imagine. But has good points, such as the inclusion of better secondary has given the film, as it is the great Bruce Willis (I like most in these short roles in roles of prota). Another point in favour of the film is that it has left to posterity great moments, as Travolta (which I think tad silly) dance, the phrase "Knights, not us chupemos the cocks still" Mr Wolf or the phrase not worse "Will play to the middle ages with your ass" that has given up for a song.In short, film made horns on two assassins and their interelaciones in a day's work. Tarantino in its purest form, which is considered his best film and masterpiece. I do not think that it is for both, although it has moments that makes it worthwhile.If only for the memorable moments.Besitos.P.D: thinking it bien, there are very clever phrases;-) |
3,026 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1690 | Ramón Besonias | 300 | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Bet Snyder by making the bed to the sedentary patriotism American, leaving point at various times of the film that the Spartans are fighting on the side of logic, freedom and Justice against barbarism Persian, delivered to hedonism, racial Exchange and religious superstition. Well could have signed with his blood Mr Bush this script. | An effective advertising deployment and warlike ardor of comic fans have enough so that theaters are filled to watch what promised to be quite a sight with an innovative aesthetic and a groundbreaking and reactionary style that would bring us to enjoy the Nice. Both promises, its aesthetic proposal and its political incorrectness, are insurance? in addition to their best assets to play his biggest weakness in the box office - and in my opinion, the most resounding cause of his mediocrity. Why not they River certain aspects that protrude to the spectator comfort.Aesthetic proposal, 300 is a product of previous products such as Sin City (as regards the adaptation from the comic and the attempt to simulate audiovisualmente) and also Gladiator or Trojan, which takes not only narrative elements, musical keys and Visual enhancements, but also the fact of having been shot in a great little per cent using famosilla blue screen. This dependence of the virtual sets is an entirely necessary resource if you want to "resemble" the comic that aims to emulate (respect or loyalty, they call him), and in no case should, if done with craft work and artistic sensibility, detract from or disappoint fans of the cellulose format. That is not the sin of 300. His demerit comes to manifest itself in the way to assemble those frames and try to give emotion and epic. Here is where Snyder succumbs to the helpings of the music video or the advertisement appeal, underlining a vacuum estecitismo that one ends very soon tired despite the beauty of some frames. Preferred content to the teenage public (which goes to the movies) to give depth to the whole without why lose force visual. The slowdown in some images is peregrina, as well as the stale romanticism which we will do rest as much Lanzada Hoplite.Do likewise, the all-powerful presence of the Narrator? resource never used by Miller in his comic - multiplies the information without unravelling the gaze of the viewer and loading too much the scenes of a narrative which themselves provide for themselves. This same remedy yet in Sin City was ideal, as the script relied less on constant action of the characters, but on human decorations which were ranging over all the footage. On the other hand, Sin City baby not only of its reference paper, but also of the black novel, in which the Narrator becomes as a figure in the story, guiding the reader into the final tragedy.The script for 300 required unfolded along two axes narrative different, if we did not want the viewer end filling up as much battle. Thus, Snyder and Johnstad happened to recreate the parallel story of the palatial intrigue between the faithful wife and opportunistic political. The alternation between both stories would thus fill almost two hours of footage, provide an apparent adulthood to the script and at the same time, as we have already suggested, have entertained the capacity until the foreseeable end, without decline his interest.It is a pity that use is made of this virtual technology without an artistic purpose which support. Hopefully next filmmakers gave us products in which the concept of beauty is less virtual and opportunistic. The comic we forgive his closed aesthetics and staff, but their passage into audio-visual language wanders by a thin line that glimpse of the emptiness of their frames. 300 not excited, it rather puzzled by its roar without shrapnel. It is as a fritter of wind, big and bloated, but without more content than imagine our desire.Does the use of the two narrative axes may be understandable, but it is on the one hand to divert from the comic, and by another opt for strengthening the political and ideological nature of a proposal that has only place (who has a true sense of ethics and want to why not let have fun watching savagery) if we take this film for what it is? or should have been -an audio-visual show no more. Tarantino is an example of a filmmaker who understands well what should be the essential of this genus rule: do not take himself very seriously. Snyder, advocates making the bed to the sedentary American patriotism, however, leaving point at various times of the film that the Spartans are fighting on the side of logic, freedom and Justice against barbarism Persian, delivered to hedonism, racial Exchange and religious superstition. Well could have signed with his blood Mr Bush this script.If I hurry, I could strain the message of the importance of will and effort to cowardice and tradition. Or simply the description without intellectual crutches of the stark reality of a war based on pictorial pictures retouched with photoshop. But no, 300 seems more a spot to recruit marines (the pass of Thermopylae acts as Iraq), or progressive video clip who sells strange thing as cool, than a film to have a good time. (Canned) beauty resides in the power of the frames, that isolated result, as in the comic, beautiful and evocative. But when the movement enlivens them turn into zombies (which is the specialty of Snyder). Nothing for now seems to resist the force found one when it passes the Miller comic view. If not you have enjoyed, make the great orientation Edition published by Norma.Por now I am satisfied to see on DVD (by my neighborhood premieres for spectators with acne only arrive) the promising appearance (also) A scanner darkly (or A Scanner Darkly, as the maltitulan instead of A dark Explorer), based on a short story by Philip K cineable. Dirk. And if not, we will always the less strident but solid the lion of Sparta, from which indignamente says feed (parasitize is more accurate) 300. |
3,027 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3672 | Oscar Martínez | 1408 | 2 | 5 | muchocine | With a first half pretty round, but can not remember 'In the mouth of fear' of John Carpernter, '1408' ends up exasperate the viewer under the ineffective formula of the ' harder still '. | Directed by Swedish Mikael Hafström and performed almost entirely by John Cusack, 1408 also has interventions of proflífico Samuel l. Jackson, Mary McCormack, Jasmine Jessica Anthony and Tony Shalhoub among others, being projected during this last Festival of Sitges in the closing gala.The film, based on the short story by Stephen King published in our country on the compilation everything is possible, tells the story of a skeptical novelist of terror, researcher of the paranormal, which believes only in what they see their eyes. After devoting himself to discredit Paranormal phenomena throughout the world, Mike begins his new bestseller about haunted hotels. However, everything will change when doubt enters into room 1408 of the Dolphin.Sin Hotel, Stephen King should be the writer, living, dead or undead, more adaptations of his novels has been transferred to both the small and the big screen: Carrie, Salem's Lot, the shining, Creepshow, Cujo, the dead zone, Christine, children of the corn, animal cemeteryMisery, It, the dark half, the store, the Green Mile, this 1408 or the still pending release in our country The mist are some of the titles that filmmakers of the calibre of Brian De Palma, George a. Romero, John Carpenter, Tobe Hooper, David Cronemberg or Stanley Kubrick wanted translated into celluloid.Some I will kill when you say that, personally, the novels of Stephen King not attracted me too (especially my girlfriend XXXD), and is probably that of the four or five books that I have read the copyright, I have not chosen precisely the best. I do not know. I'm staying with Poe and Lovecraft, what going you to do. As well, however, one must recognize that many of its adaptations or screenplays for the small or large screen tend to be fairly decent, good sometimes, and even on time excellent, as it is the case of the recent series Kingdom Hospital, not to mention other more obvious examples.Going to the movie itself, I must say that 1408 could have given much more than Yes, especially if its format is different or, what is the same, yet shorter. I guess turning a short story into a film is what you have. And it is that Mikael Hafström Swedish film is divided into two clearly identifiable but not by them different parts. Do and that what it means? That despite its 94 minutes, 1408 is constiuida hourly quite solvent, bright on time, and a final half-hour of absolute stuffed.The truth is that a room in which strange paranormal events occur gives much of the self and at the same time very soon, because the plot can fall in a permutation that is limited to loop the loop, as is the case with 1408. As usual with this type of film, in the time in which the terror passes suggested to show in all its evil splendor, it ceases to be appealing and disturbing for the Viewer, that without taking into account that the basis of 1408 continues to be the same as that of the shining, the aforementioned Kingdom Hospitalthe genius of John Carpenter entitled at the mouth of the fear and so many other products, in which one space - is a room, a hotel, a hospital, or a city-is cursed for one reason or another, preventing the protagonist to discern between fiction and reality.Thus, 1408 is a product relatively entertaining during its first hour of footage, perhaps less, to then become a bland in crescendo to nor convincing monologue interpretation of John Cusack is able to sustain.I am a 5'5 out of 10. |
3,028 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1274 | José A. Peig | La última tentación de Cristo | 4 | 5 | muchocine | One of the reviews of the above most surprising and original myth that you can see that this rummages in the different dimensions of the myth with a laudable intention regenerating and introspective, putting into question many dogmas and characteristics of a doctrine and a theological scheme that governs the consciences of millions of believers. | The figure of Jesus Christ has the power of fascination that transcends generations and cultures and as an object of veneration or philosophical reflection that lends itself to many lectures, reviews or manipulations according to beliefs or mental patterns of each individual or society. This cross-cultural value is not something exclusive to the Galileo born in Bethlehem, but that is a feature of the Archetypes of knowledge and the human adventure, from the great founders of religions to the heroes who have led and motivated the rich mythological background of humanity. Jesus Christ is a myth - a supposed historical base, on that subject there is and there will always be controversy - whose characteristics evoke both the human and the divine in a social environment changes, uncertainty in the future, crisis and revolution in the heyday of the Roman Empire. And hence a wealth of nuances which, well used, can be a good material to make major film, since it allows to focus the story sacred from different points of view: Jesus the man, Jesus the God, Jesus the revolutionary, the Prophet, the religious reformer, the madman who shouts in the desert, the katte. We already saw as Mel Gibson wasted his chance limited to develop a mere visual illustration of the biblical text but adding an Assembly with the sole purpose of emotionally manipulate the viewer and perpetrate tips free morbid and thus make the interesting so that everyone talk about their film.In the case of "The last temptation of Christ", we find one of the reviews of the above most surprising and original myth that you can see that this rummages in the different dimensions of the myth with a laudable intention regenerating and introspective, putting into question many dogmas and characteristics of a doctrine and a theological scheme that governs the consciences of millions of believers.Believers, but it has to be very clear that an artistic object has no more or less value according to their rebellious nature or its transgressive message according to ideologies and other phobias and aversions you collective. If someone finds or appreciates the movie of Scorsese as an "anti-Catholic" work will be a mistake, as its role as a piece of film art is the play and scavenging all metaphorical or interpretative possibilities deriving from the christic myth, proposing an approach in which the figure of Jesus unfolds in two alternatives that are two modes of interpreting (or place) his archetypal conditioncontrasted to configure your profile of multidimensional archetype, which comes to be a splendid metaphor that dissects the eternal struggle inside, the struggle between the carnal and the spiritual, the earthly and the heavenly.Therefore, the film focuses more on developing philosophical aspects than in showing a Jesus "son of God" to use. It is a film of a high density, a far cry from the requirements and business needs. In the politico-social we see a Jesus of Nazareth Builder Carpenter of the crosses to crucify Jews, placing the character in a position controversial at the social level, which is derived from an exempt from all conventionalism look at the traditional idea of Jesus as a faithful follower of tradition and the collective identity of the Israelis. In that vein, here the nazareno is not just a reformer of the tradition, but also an "outsider" that low a profile of restless spirit raises doubts about its own identity and the identity of the culture to which it belongs. The meaning and the nature of concepts such as the Messiah, God's Kingdom, release of Israel, spirit and body are addressed through a dynamic speech, in which each character represents a different Prism or a critical reinterpretation of the meaning, purpose and fundamental value of the figure of the Messiah, the Messenger of God or whatever.Tells us, by the way, the initiatory journey of a warrior in permanent struggle with himself and with others. Jesus Christ loves Magdalena but rejects the conjugal life in pursuit of a transcendent mission. It is the same image of the hero that breaks all ties to focus his life on one higher goal. Stabbing case is that here the family shows as a drag on that path to be superior, contradicting Christian and Catholic tradition that puts the family in an inescapable podium for the correct structuring of the society and the moral good. See how the Christ deceived by the devil disguised as angel is symbolizing the passivity and stagnation of old age; the family is the ballast that will ruin any claim of making God and move the foundations of humanity. This is one of their most provocative aspects and a topic which refers to the hero that destroys the bonds that bind him to the Earth in the sense of stability and conservatism of the family life. The great men that really manage to bring something to civilization, sacrifice many things to get to the sky of the myths.The complexity of discourse gives to much more, we leave here. The rest is pure film craft, the usual sober and brioso pulse of Martin Scorsese (that not great, everything must be said) to the service of a reflective vision and self-criticism. In this unfolding of Jesus behind a dialogue autorecriminativo between the social Convention and wild from abroad in their land and dissident freedom of everyone and everything: the Jesus defeated death (albeit only in the field of popular belief) gives mankind hope and a sense. The Jesus who stays at home with the women and children, aging, symbolizes the aging defeated and alienated from the problems of the world, the forgetting of dreams and ideals. Heaven and Earth, body and soul, and a self-critical Jesus Christ in the middle of the crossroads, taking advantage of this way its immense archetypal flow to show us several edges on the problems of the humán, religion and philosophy, and this is a great artistic achievement. Let us look at the words of Nikos Kazantzakis, author of the book on which the film is based: "the double personality of Christ, the suffering, both human and superhuman, of a man to reach God, has always been an enduring mystery for me." "My main desire and the source of my venturas y desventuras since childhood, has been a relentless and cruel battle between the spirit and the carne.y my soul is the field of fight where these two armies have found and fought" |
3,029 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2214 | Red Stovall | Tideland | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Very bad, the worst of Gilliam, and that more time should be included in the batch of films coming to us with great delay (en 2005) and premiered in rare places. At this stage we are already used to, and in this case, better than best. | The former monthly Python Terry Gilliam has managed to create a career with some fame, along with John Cleese if this in the field of interpretation, which is such a fun group of comedians. Movies like?The heroes of the time? and?Do do Brazil?, and to a lesser extent? 12 Monkeys? and?The Fisher King?, are good sample of good make Gilliam, films of different thematic but very recognizable in the style of a director who almost always made what has given him pleases, though for this has had to deal with a good part of the critique, and also of the public. Something that has had its greatest exponent with?Do Tideland?, which is receiving some of the most ruthless criticism that recall, and the truth is that I'm not surprised at all.The amazing argument of?Tideland? It begins when the absolute protagonist of the story, a girl called Jeliza-Rose flees with his father, a finish and some rock singer, once his mother die victim of an overdose of methadone. They refugiarán in a lost House of the hand of God, in which the father will go on "vacation" due to the dose that so carefully prepares you his daughter, and this will create their own fantasy world, full of extravagant and rare characters.Does my companion Beatrice, in his review of the film, spoke of the evident similarity of this film with?The Laberinto del Fauno? Guillermo del Toro, who was also in the same directions. The truth is that one is a demonstration of how to do things right, and the other of how do them wrong. Do the curious thing is that in?Tideland? sees the hand of Gilliam 100%, its clear and recognizable style from beginning to end, but this time things have not the slightest sense, and Gilliam has made a film with the same intention, reputable and hated at the same time, other authors have from time to time: live from the tale. Almost dare to say that this is closer to the nonsense of David Lynch entitled?Does Inland Empire?, which laughed half the world and part of the other. Gilliam, like Lynch, has a name, and knows that arriving. But one thing is skating and offer a film well below the possibilities of its director, as it may be?Does the secret of the Brothers Grimm?, and quite another, do what come you in WINS, no feet or head and claim you uphold only because Yes.Do maybe clarify that during the filming of?The secret of the Brothers Grimm? He was there to do a break by the complicated shooting that had such film, and Gilliam or short nor lazy was rolling in record time?Do Tideland?, so if this film responds to a need to relax the Gilliam Lord by all the stress accumulated in the movie starring Matt Damon, then okay, can be understood. But, as public, we must decide what we think the film, and seeing it is very clear that Gilliam has given as the public passing by lining all the commandments, or rules, or as you want to call them.Things in?Tideland? they happen because Yes and without explanation. The dizziness that produces in the Viewer is not because Gilliam has demonstrated a confusing staging, no, there will not the topic, but thematically and arguably. For starters, the flight of the father with his daughter, after her mother dies, is totally incomprehensible and nothing credible. From there, everyone who believes in his head the breeding does not respond to any logic, which would have his grace if it were presented in attractive, but the lack of interest and boredom are the General tonic for the film. Gives us absolutely equal everything we see in the film. Gives us just why the girl is invented everything is invented, and does not seem to be because their parents are some drug addicts of noses, because she is very happy with them, not even because his mother will not let him take their chocolates, something really absurd. Then, in the imaginary world, call it so, disinterest is total, although in this case we have to endure to one or another character of most unbearable. And I am not going to talk about the foul allusions to pedophilia or necrophilia, to name only two examples soft. To film him fails to be absurd, bad and boring, it also has to be disgusting.Probably the only thing salvageable from this nonsense is its young protagonist, the girl child, Jodelle Ferland, who is delivered with passion to his character, and despite all their paranoia, manages to not be burdensome, even when he speaks with his unbearable head doll. All stakeholders appear to histriónicos clowns getting out of proportion to the Viewer, especially a desfasadísimo Jeff Bridges, with a poorly drawn character. It would also save the soundtrack, the work of the brothers Mychael and Jeff Danna.Por else a film very bad, the worst of Gilliam, and that more time should be included in the batch of films coming to us with great delay (en 2005) and it premiered in rare places. At this stage we are already used to, and in this case, better than best. |
3,030 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2751 | Tyler | El ultimátum de Bourne | 4 | 5 | muchocine | The movie that closes the trilogy of Bourne tells us what we needed to know about Jason Bourne, resolves the incognitas on which was kept the trilogy. A required summer movie in times in which action lapses. | The Bourne trilogy arose thanks to the success of the first. There were other books on which to base more movies, but the idea was to make the first and point. The success of the movie of Doug Liman(Sr._y_Sra._Smith) was enormous and it opened the way for a trilogy, typical of Holywood. It was decided to slightly change the tone and they hired another Director, Paul Greengrass, who had garnered much success with this wonder who was give SUNDAY. Successful change has to be said, while the first worthy nothing to the trilogy. The case Bourne had the worst screenplay of all, and it did not sell so well. The phrase of promotion of the movie was "with a pursuit of emotion similar to the French Connection", which is not true, nor joke going to compare. Even so it was a success of the chalice. Well, the first part was the most similar to the book which was based, something that the other two seem rather short. This it is because I've read, not because there are read books, therefore not can be very reliable in that regard. But gives equal, when it apadta a book send a tomar por culo many things, necessarily because the literature is not very film, with the exception of Elmore Leonard and Raymond Chandler would say I, but my opinion matters rather little.THE BOURNE ULTIMATUM is a very good movie, with a rhythm reminiscent of the movies of the 1970s, type PELHAM 1,2,3 or the movies of Don Siegel, but with a touch more modern, long computer and technological paraphernalia. It has a tone very much in the line of the previous, even more nervous, Greengrass has molado him la Movida Madrileña in Flight 93, a true peliculón, and repeated the formula, more camera on his shoulder, until almost abusing it. But he forgives her, because history not it decays. The Bourne trilogy is risky, because the three parties are of the same, this note want to know quies is, because this and that and which. and that is painful, because the writer has to count that there are people who have not seen the previous two, and build a script that works by itself, but that you also put in that situation, and fast, because if you throw long explaining becomes boring, especially for those who have seen the other two. I saw the movie with my girlfriend that I had not seen the other two, and he understood everything to the perfeción, it took to get into the story, but he saw that something typical and explanatory, originally was necessary because if not, you have not understood anything, she did not have specific information about the character that I if because he had seen the other two movies. Then it got in the movie and enjoyed her until the end. Matt Damon is the ideal actor for this character, without being the best actor of his generation, if it is one very fit, with great ability to adapt and that, increasingly, you do better, always improves, alcontrario that some hold that being good, he always improves. The end is very good, did not expect me this at all, it is a well built and very well prepared, because without being the typical surprise ending to the beast, surprised a lot only by well prepared that is. This tells us that there is no need an overwhelming, if not a well constructed story end and a well prepared final. |
3,031 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1197 | José A. Peig | Apocalypto | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Apocalypto offers us not only awhile of great show but also of good cinema. Leaving aside to?Do Braveheart?, is the best Mel Gibson movie to date. | We started with a plane in travelling to us closer to wild nature of the physical world in which runs the story. Hunting and trapping of the wild boar that ends in bloody death in the trap of Aboriginal comes to inform us what is to come. The plan that closes the narrative shows a family of survivors that they delve deep in the jungle. Apocalypto is a film about survival and violence in a half wild and on the fears and hopes of an individual and an Aboriginal community. The presence of the Maya plays no essential role. That here there is a story that could have happened in different times and places.Therefore, what is interesting and what deserves to be highlighted is the physical and geographical environment that Mel Gibson used to develop a history of action, which, to her we sort under the label of "action film" always works very well. And it works thanks to the brioso and often stunning pulse camera and barbed levels which, in this case, for the pure and simple, violent action take a great effect for a memorable show. The pace also is more than correct and we have a filming have little or nothing to envy to the most consolidated authors on the subject. Gibson, what question should be, is it happened big filming this story that encandilará to a large segment of the public.In its initial stretch, the story has all the earmarks of being an adventure film, without more, with the eternal theme of revenge giving wings to a very topical argument: invasión-agresión - abduction-escape-revenge-new beginning. If it were an other unpretentious adventure film, as required wouldn't the originality in the history, but that how history is expressed in images. Many accuse Gibson give treatment stereotyped groups faced. But, I insist and no mistake, Apocalypto it is (?) an adventure film, it is not a "historical review of the Mayans" or nonsense like that you can listen to or read these days in different media. It is a film - starting, we make that assumption - about "good against evil" and in such a case, it is fair to characterize the characters agree with Manichean, dualistic representation. The human emotional relationship is compressed in a few essential ideas: the love of family, fundamentally. Clear, put the adventure in an Aboriginal context with its corresponding tribal regime - organized by kinship - does not gives rise to make too many stunts.We are attentive, however, Apocalypto has more than one level of understanding. We have already said that if we stay in that order of things which is pure entertainment with style and strength, little would accuse him of. But it would be naive to deny claims go beyond that. "Apocalypto" embeds a discourse on survival, dominance and power between civilizations, and conflicts between different collective human onscreen: guerreros-sacerdotes power of influence in the Mayan culture, a minority group represented in the subject Aboriginal tribe which rises in protagonist of the final moral (a new beginning) and the European conquerors who come to the shore of the new world with his menacing shipsarmor, and religious symbols. "Higher" civilizations subject and enslave the "lower". This speech has no depth or originality, is reduced to a mere scheme. It matters little that either, at the thematic level, it aims to provide otherwise.But the content of the film is not limited to the human level: the fauna is integrated into that chain of struggling to survive. What we have said at the beginning: the initial level (which suddenly appears a boar emerged from the undergrowth of the forest) opens the circle which closes with the flat end (a family of Aboriginal people entering the same thickness). Thus, what we have is an adventure that unfolds in struggles for survival or dominate either in a natural or cultural sense. It would seem that the whole of humanity, stripped of the modern tricks and inserted in a dangerous wild world, is represented in the movie using a structure and an organization of topics quite coherent and cohesive in some of them, not on the entire spectrum of styles and subjects, as we'll explain immediately. With this, we conclude that Apocalypto offers us a great show, but also good movies not only while. Leaving aside to "Braveheart" (much higher than the rest), Mel Gibson's best movie to date.However, its flaws are the same as the usual in the Filmography of Australian filmmaker; The capricious use of disruptive and plot elements. The case of the eclipse that saves the life of the hero in extremis creates a confusion of genres and consistency in style: do stand before a realistic film (subjected to the laws of reality) or before a fantastic fable?. Know that an eclipse never develops the form shown in the film and is a scene which seems taken from a comic book or an animated film. In this scene, key in the argumentative aspect, Gibson is not respected either himself or his work by capriciously breaking the logical coherence of the represented world. Uses a plot excuse inspired by the prophecy promulgated by a young Aboriginal girl to drive the plot where you but to violate the laws of the represented world. In this mixture of elements (realistic elements with fantasy elements) there is a confusion not justified.Gives the impression that the writer makes things "because it", with what the plot structure deteriorates considerably. Cannot be introduced variables in history without creating a few channels (implicit or explicit laws) so that these variables not deforming the contents, tones and the style. It is not more than a whim dramatic, like many other scenes of dream-like nature that catch-up, are filling the screen as a cheap trick to impress impressionable viewers but tools for critical judgment. |
3,032 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/257 | JohnTrent | Las colinas tienen ojos | 4 | 5 | muchocine | This?The hills have eyes? It is one of the best proposals that have reached us of the genre in recent years | In 1977, a still maiden Wes Craven directed the cult film "the hills have eyes", shortly after having led another small cult classic as it is "the last House on the left". In these two films we found ourselves with a marked use of earthly and realistic, so stark as cold violence. "The hills have eyes" is not a film of terror in the strict sense of the term but rather what have come to be termed "films about and/or cruelty". And it is that in that proposal, Wes Craven we stood in a deserted space lost anywhere, in full light of day and with some maniacs willing to feed a family travelling by Caravan. This was "the hills have eyes", and his result was more than right, being one of the most notable films of its director. In full fashion of the 70s horror film remakes it was hoped that late or early, we got one of "the hills have eyes", and this has been.The project, as well as hopefully provided that emerged a remake of a cult movie, was initially greeted with few expectations by many fans, but little by little the new news about the names involved in the project were thinking something good could come out of all this. It is that, as soon as you confirm that Alexander Adja, the director promising of the notable "high tension" was going to be after the cameras the expectations were growing, and no doubt the wait was worth it.Once seen the movie, one is left feeling that Adja has had a free hand to do what has given him the win, and that "High tension" was not any display of quality lost in time. And is that, "the hills have eyes", remake, joins the also brilliant remake of "Dawn of the dead" as only two revisions of cult classics of the genre that they have managed to overcome their original, despite who gets upset. What is more, this "the hills have eyes" is one of the best proposals that have reached us of the genre in recent years, and certainly an exercise in cruelty collapsed in its final stretch of moments that will delight all amateur to the most brutal genre, al gore and the same original Wes Craven.Como saidthe brutality of the film before us is difficult within a today day commercial production. Without going any further, the recent "Hostel" which though to be entertaining and correct not far reaches elevations of sadism and violence that so high announcing its managers, stays as a tale for children compared to this film. Perhaps, more fans to genres such as al gore and several brutal movies, not impact us much or at least not to the degree that can impact viewers less accustomed to this kind of films, but I think that anyone who sees "the hills have eyes" certainly was not indifferent to images.At the beginning, "the hills have eyes", remake, after a spectacular prologue is dedicated to follow almost basically what we saw in the original. Therefore, we enter at the gas station and later in the shortcut to a family into a hell. But shortly after this when Alexander Adja takes the reins of history, presenting us with the family of manic, which this time are mutants you deformed because of the army tests. From the first moment that appear the action is triggered in a "in crescendo" of cruelty, sadism and torture that not apiadan anyone, tracing the attack on the Caravan that we saw in the original almost to the millimetre, but this time even more cruel. But it is shortly after this when this remake extracts an ACE of manga, which will take place in an unhealthy place where the horror will grow beyond the version Craven.Todo in "the hills have eyes" has a spectacular visual aspect, a composition of levels very carefully, good work on the resolution of the key moments and a disturbing rhythm makes us prepare always for a new event.Now if we can already say that "Dawn of the dead" was not an isolated example and that even though sometimes cost us to recognize it, a well done remake may be superior to its source of influences. Everything in "the hills have eyes" is an "improved, extended and uncensored" from the film Wes Craven, a gift for the fans of the original and the genre in general. |
3,033 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2263 | José A. Peig | El cazador | 4 | 5 | muchocine | This is one of the best portraits of which the war of Viet Nam meant for class American media. A look intimate and tragic at the same time. | Exhibition and conceptual simplicity couples attend a husking speech, with its rhythmic narrative, as regards one of the most tragic paradoxes of human existence: the need for harmony and balance, friendship and love, faced with the reality of war and violence. Somehow, there is also a need for violence, and the most unique of the movie he directed Michael Cimino, is to synthesize the paradox in a single character, "The Hunter" interpreted by the perennial Robert De Niro, who already in their garbeos mountain, in the first third of the film, shows such a search in their hunting of fawns: the shot and the agonising death of the animal, and suffering reflected in the eyes, they seem to reproach the free violation of life, beating both the consciousness of the Viewer as to the of the own De Niro, who on a second occasion misses the shot and let escape her prey in accordance with a new scheme of values emerged from the experience in Viet Nam ("deacuerdoooooo").Solo but friend and companion of his friends, the main character is located on the central axis of the drama be strong in courage and determination, will save his friends in the most fierce trances and comfort women of the lost. "The Hunter" may have two readings that complement each other: on the one hand, is the story of a man who reaffirms his personality through the experience of war. On the other hand, is the story of a group of men and women whose lives degenerate from the stability of proletarian and puritanical American society based on patriotic traditions: families, work, alcohol and casinos. The aggressive industrial terrain of the city - in their first sequences, a noisy truck enters the people throwing smoke and loitering by the factories, the landscape shows rough that opens the film - serves as the ideal context for a superb display of human relations that are broken after the "crusade" in Vietnam.La illusion and represented in the first stretch Festival contrasts with the subsequent abatementdeception and disappointment. And thus it can be said that the contrast is one of its main features, even by the abrupt way of shifting the Viewer from a docile universe and costumbrist (a group of friends in the casino, listening to the music of a piano, with a gesture of deep melancholy) to the hell of war (corpses and the screams of a Vietnamese burning alive is what we see in the next scene)mounting is configured so that the history is better than ever when it is referred from the whole, not so much by the development of its parts and moments, some of them hurt by unnecessary use of the slow pace, with which the narrative falls, often in purely descriptive. Said might add that this film would have been much more round with a cut in the footage.The final scene is really illustrative of the essential intention encourages the film: a patriotic song in memory of the lost friend, the only consolation that remains. This is one of the best portraits of which the war of Viet Nam meant for class American media. A look intimate and tragic at the same time. |
3,034 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2421 | Silvia Giner | Transformers | 5 | 5 | muchocine | This film is undoubtedly one of the musts of 2007. A compulsory step for the film. the pace in Crescendo, paste a small prick 40 minutes before that end up worst then back, notaréis it by miraréis the watch at the time. | Michael Bay directed the first sequel of what we plan to be a memorable and historical saga, the sengunda part entitled "Tranformers 2" is scheduled for 2009. And that first delivery gentlemen, absolutely stunning, and it was really difficult do something tufara to movie East of Z series, but good when you have a producer that chracter Spielberg, the thing is not provided. Michael, who has been responsible for the photography of Coyote Ugly and the direction of Armageddon, applied their noble strategies to this spectacular film, but has his stuff. Thus it is that you are obviously going to notice parallels with the films mentioned above, and is that at the end and the safe place that spiritually speaking, shrewd Mr Bay, it was preparing for what will be a seal of quality in his filmography.Transformers boasts the latest in imaging technology and FX with digital processing, so is that you are going to freak out. The storyline is very faithful to what we have seen of children in the famous children's animated series that bears the same name. It is clear that we are following the general tone of Hollywood to film old glories of the comic and TV but as long as the world is full of useless paid a paste for touch 3 times, the thing continue. Anyway I think that this stage we live in cinema was necessary, because the mass public would never know or known the existence of stories as wonderful as Sim City or 300, were it not for this new trend we are going through.This film is undoubtedly one of the musts of 2007. A compulsory step for the film. the pace in Crescendo, paste a small prick 40 minutes before that end up worst then back, notaréis it by miraréis the watch at the time.It has been incredible to see with so much realism to Optimus Prima and his soldiers, the same megratrón & company, brilliant absolutely and dramatic transformations.And now go with the incongruencia:1 - if a casualty has no pulse how can be screaming? or perhaps screams and then it is without pulse? 2 - if all communication systems fail, as balls suddenly work randomly when it suits the storyline? And why the Defense Minister must give 2 times the same absurd order of the shortwave, by God to malo.3 - How can put a head of section 7 as clown like that? the interpretation is dire and the character does not paste anything, seems that it is in another movie, I am sure that is a jewel of Spielberg, is him but gets infantilism by somewhere not far tranquilo.4 - as a guy that is dragged by a 350 m bike to all ostia on the tarmac, when it rises only has a small rupture of the clothes in the fatal codo.puff that detailIt has worn the art and costume.And now, the despelleje: well the despelleje of this criticism is going to carry the plugged Miss, toady, buenaparanada Megan Fox who plays Mikaela Banes. That all the actresses are removed years is already a general tone, removing 3 or 4 years, it's worth. But fuck, remove 7 years. This lerda intended us to believe we have 21 years old just turned, to see Megan daughter, who see you legs of rooster, I do not cheat me, you have a foquito by down all your flat primerprimerísimos to illuminate your face and or so the you hit me with age. In addition to more horrifying skin full of pimples that then you have digitally retouched with a great veil that you have and the indirect lights, but we are back to the same thing, not her das me. You just have to look at the time sunset at the beginning of the movie when you climb into the car with Sam, hence perfectly see you the skin of horror that you have, you had the rule that day? and I'm going to tí pq going great. Collagen of your upper lip focused in 3 rooms front of the lip line "sucks", only thing decent you have is laser whitening. The Loofah hair, not everything is be thin daughter. the forzadísimas faces of situation, you strive to portray the beauty all the time neglecting the naturalness that should have a character with so much action. Anyway, it assumes your 27 years and takes some classes of improvisation. Finally tell you daughter, that you'll be happy pq are going even if your makeup is pathetic (Orange key) you have favored the most in your plans.On the other hand comment when he left the film, had a few young extrahormonados, happily commenting, dialogue was shit. Well well, these guys, I must say, that one must obviously know what kind of movie is going to see when you enter in a film. Obviously in a film like this are not going to find great dialogues that already of itself the comic does not fuck, if you wanted to see deep dialogues are why not you going to see independent film buds? your dialogues that are shit "iyo iyo botellón".in finEn super general terms, I recommend it absolutely. |
3,035 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4345 | Jaime Martínez | Saw 4 | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Zarrapastrosa narration, with a multitude of negrísimos holes and inconsistencies of script her try us strain distorting reality and mixing us continually flashbacks with today. | Definitely Saw saga has come to an end. Not to an end as a franchise, since Lions Gate seems the goose that lays the golden egg by with Jigsaw, and as long as they build the pull you have to Saw V and Saw VI. I say that it is over for his screenplay, Bill, history and quality. Not be can stretch more a saga when he doesn't more than if. If already with the third level fell considerably, now this fourth there where take it. Firstly, this incoherent storytelling through flashbacks, mixing past and present. Sr.Lynn Bousman, with all due respect you is not (nor will be at this rate) Iñarritu in 21 grams, Amores Perros and or much less Nolan on Memento or Tarantino in Pulp Fiction; then not try please, leave that to the professionals of truth. Zarrapastrosa narration, with a multitude of negrísimos holes and inconsistencies of script her try us strain distorting reality and mixing us continually flashbacks with today. To all this we add the (im) predictable plot twist at the end - typical in the saga - and have a trash in every rule. Is that not realize that turn script was more than exhausted in the first part and if I hurry in the second? It seems that they do not understand. And to make matters worse, the 83 - endless-minutes that lasts by removing end credits, 10 minutes correspond to scenes past previous deliveries, which reflected the lack of ideas coming from the team and the need to fill with unnecessary flashbacks that all footage that make is rolling to the Viewer. For the fans of the guts and gore, among which certainly I find, highlight only the scene of the autopsy to Jigsaw with all kinds of detail and a unique "test". The only thing the to really interesting (testing) has lost its originality and grace. A shame, certainly the worst in the series, every hand along with the 3. Finally, the phrase alive or dead, your decide to just getting tired when you hear her 20 times. Renew or die, never better said. |
3,036 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/289 | Rafa Ferrer | Silent Hill | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Finally it seems that things are done well in the world of film vs. video games, it was a memorable adaptation time | For a time this part live adaptations of video games, some made by visual terrorist Uwe Bowl, others, notable and/or completely dispensable (adaptation of "Mario Bros" or "Street Fighter II") finally seems to do things right in the world of film vs. video games, already it was time to a memorable (and not unfortunate) adaptation as they come always.Christophe Gans, proposes a dark film with touches of "bad feeling" and excellent work with an argument related to the video game, Radha Mitchell, Sean Bean (for my will always be "Boromi") as well as Laurie Holden (which was known by "The Majestic"), the only negative note that I see is that it seems that they lose a bit in giving a grim meaning to the movie and this has just falling in a spiral where one failed to understand part of the plot initial, go to or you are very attentive, or as you paste a cabezada, or look at the neckline of your viewing partner!These lost!In short, a more than decent adaptation of the video game, which have to be attentive to 500%. |
3,037 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2343 | Iñaki Bilbao | Ladrones | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Estimable's first feature film Jaime Marques. Good first film of James Marquis, which starts strong in the Spanish scene. We will continue his career, it seems much deserve the penalty. | Sober first film in the film of James Marquis Olarreaga, very serious in their approach, not complacent with the viewer and an unconventional narrative which won the special jury prize at the last Festival of Málaga. Marquis Spanish film dominates the art of script, managing to capture a hard, sad, in a very personal way violent, history of search for identity of a lonely person who tries to achieve dream: find her mother and, I say, to live with her happy the rest of its existence.Along the way you realize, if that did not know already, that life is a jungle where nobody gives anything for nothing and where each one them it should be understood as possible to survive.Few but good dialogues, excellent performances, with a, again after "Cabeza de perro", Juan José Ballesta content and a Maria Valverde that fills the screen with his special face. Concise narration that constantly plays with light and spaces, as well as the sound and music.All of this makes "Thieves" is as a very, very serious work, away than usual in Spanish film, which does not have downs or pace or dramatic intensity, going with ease of amusing sketches of manners and the sparkling dialogues between the two protagonists, certainly foreseeable end but no less forceful.This not subtract interest to this good first film of James Marquis, which starts strong in the Spanish scene. We will continue his career, it seems much deserve the penalty. |
3,038 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/218 | Raccord | Xmen3 | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Superficial, okay, but very entertaining and sense of humor. | Multicine film in its purest form. It must be the brain of one of popcorn that swell to sell due to this film, to see something else, apart from the explosions and some very funny mutant. Surface; Okay, but very entertaining and sense of humor.The adaptation of a comic to the big screen that I liked most is probably the X-Men saga. Although it isn't saying much, seen the series of disasters that have filled our theaters lately. And probably the reason why these films of mutants, I love so much is that they not precisely intended to tracing the comic, such as "Sin City", but taking the original characters; create situations and new adventures. Which we are discussing, is of similar quality to the other two of the X-Men series. Here the story is a little more crude, and there is almost no new characters; but they supplement it with spectacular special effects (even for a "blockbuster" movie) and some quite achieved gags.Also want to speak too much of the plot, because I imagine that few the you have seen yet; and if I put to wander on the curiosity that give me the pout of similar (not out too in X Men III, by the way) because it would not be plan. So I will give the can on the villains in movies. In the 1980s and 1990s the bad Street par excellence were always heavy or punks "old school". Attend now astonished as Hollywood rather than overcome clichés transforms them: the mutants "bad", henchmen of Magneto, are the same young face of few friends of the ochenteras movies, but with a closer to Hardcore or the Gothic aesthetic. Hordes of young people with nails painted black and mittens fighting Wolverine and storm, as if they might come out super pissed a Marylin Manson concert. Is which the next urban by demonizing tribe? I already imagine the IV X-Men fighting against hundreds of Bakala. |
3,039 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3632 | Tito Chinchan | Ratatouille | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Movie about a rat who wants to be a chef and a boy who does not know what he wants. Another small masterpiece of overcoming and love towards the family, that will delight children and will hunger to elders. | Director: Brad Bird. duration: closer to the two hours that the hour and a half.Release date: August 3, 2007.Muchas times it has accused me of fatten criticisms of animated films, which may well be true, but now that I have family that taste children's DVDs, this fattening not is if it will take me to put more than 5 stars to one. Warned quedais. And it is that, if a Sunday at 7: 30 you've had breakfast, you you've dressed, you've drawn, made constructions and what you have left is to see a rat chef, while your small you fits in the lap to scream and jump when they go out mice, that is not valued by stars.The film is about a rat which is lover of haute cuisine. In his family, thousands of inhabitants, they do not understand that fans, given that they only eat garbage and do not want any contact with humans. One day, by chance, our rat knows a guy that you like to be a chef, and works in the restaurant of the deceased chef who likes to our rat.As almost always with these people, the technical quality of the work is more than remarkable, with a humanization of the rat which contrasts with their peers. The use of the hair I was quite surprised, given that it is very natural, nothing apelzamado as it could be in both fur animals. The script is film for the whole family. It shows that by very small or different you are, you can always reach your goals. And, of course, as the family there is no nothing. This is perhaps the only black point of the film, but are so rich ratitas cooking. He has no points of humour causing laughter, but if that leaves the feeling that the world is good and you only have to do a bit of your part to change it.In short, movie about a rat who wants to be a chef and a boy who does not know what he wants. Another small masterpiece of overcoming and love towards the family, that will delight children and hunger that will give the elderly. that Nice!Besitos.P.D: The rest of the Sunday I spent to cook three fires. I have tuppers for the entire week.P.D.2: the scene in which father moves and the baby look you with the face of "¿Quieres the tete?" you will not see in the extras of the DVD;-) |
3,040 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/237 | Noa | Los amantes del círculo polar | 5 | 5 | muchocine | A love story to slow fire, a tale of coincidences of circles, eyes. | Back in the year 1998, Julio Medem premiered his fourth film as director, the lovers of the Arctic circle. He confessed to have included many autobiographical references in the story, and also confessed the depression suffered at the end of filming, after their total involvement in the project. I think that he corrected it with happy end of "Sex and Lucia". Symbols, colors and music by Alberto Iglesias are the main signs of identity of the personal universe of Medem.Cuando film a movie radiates charm and I love deeply, do not leave me the written words. Something that describes this melancholy film is difficult to explain. I shall start with Gonzalo f. Berridi, responsible for the photography. It hard to think how managed so the coldness of the images fit like a puzzle in the love story of Anne and Otto. It certainly worked, as a deep sleep where there is nothing warmer than love, the rest is cold, fragile and intangible. Here we also see as Medem rescues the mother of Otto of the icy weather. The story is sublime. A life full of coincidences or perhaps a default destination. The protagonists are responsible for telling the same story according to their points of view, making the script in an almost poetic delight, and at times shocking. Some will see it too corny, maybe, for tastes nothing is written.There are so many things that they fascinate me the film I can not stay with one. Isn't wonderful that phrase of love writes Otto in the paper airplanes? The director did not want her to discover that each envisaged the perfect love phrase. Najwa Nimri is splendid, evocative and mysterious, Fele Martínez may be underneath it but complies to the young actors like (including the son of Julio Médem) which interpret different stages of the couple, Nancho Novo and the rest of the cast. A love story to slow fire, a tale of coincidences of circles, eyes. The destination, Finland, Alberto Iglesias, Najwa Nimri. A history of brave jump out the window, waiting for the chance of his life. Lovers of the Arctic circle or a hypnotic wonder. |
3,041 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1762 | Alex Largo | La Caja Kovak | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Even with all the drawbacks which I have brought to the script and others, I can say that it is a good movie. We can be proud that it is above Spanish. | A very accurate, entertaining, good, film and non-event. These are the characteristics of this film. Very correct (okay well directed, recorded with some good performances), entertaining (it is a thriller film, and fulfils its task without bore us in no time), good (is a good film, which together like a lot), and 75th (American, Chinese or Spanish, is non-event and lose the memory of people before year's end (if not already done)).Responsible for (and do not say this as something negative) the film is Daniel Monzón, before putting this film, endorsed the critic. His best-known project is "The biggest robbery never told". I have not seen the movie, but he certainly enjoys the sympathy of many people.As for the movie before us, as well. I, of course, have not given by lost the afternoon. In general terms, the film is "intelligent". But as of usual in this kind of films, "enjoying" a couple of moments that should have fallen, not in the editing room, but in the first rewrite of the screenplay. And it is where all the elements of the film are supported in the script. Which has its shortcomings, their holes (or its gaps) and their slips. In general it is a good script, but it suffers from a few (say a couple as I say a dozen) of moments that do not contribute anything to the story and makes above do not we take it seriously. For example, the time on the plane, when the protagonist sees that sort of bug bloodied or whatever is on the computer. Tell me: adds something to the story? do you have any sense? It establishes connection with some subsequent event? NO. Those who have seen the movie know what I am talking about.It is a real shame that the script has many inconsistencies and moments that have gotten them shoehorn.With regard to the work of monsoon after the cameras we could say that it is good. But we would be unfair. The direction of monsoon has many ups and downs. There are moments in which man is seen enthusiasm and desire, are moments with an outstanding address. But when it comes to a moment that doesn't interest you too. just the opposite. But in general, as I have already said, good.With regard to the work of the actors. Correct. Only, exclusively. Hutton, in the title role. well, very bland. But correct. Lucía Jiménez, very correct, but on occasions, perhaps sobreactúa a little. The only really undertake its work more than, is David Kelly, in the role of the evil Kovak. And it is that every time that it appears on screen, actor, leave to others, to the ground.Another noteworthy aspect of the film is its superb soundtrack. Signed by the increasingly more international Roque Baños. even with all the drawbacks which I have brought to the script and others, I can say that is a good movie. We can be proud that it is above Spanish. |
3,042 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2605 | José A. Peig | Ratatouille | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Entertain with little recourse to extreme simplicity, golden rule to build a product aimed at the immediate divertimento, without worrying about if in 20 years someone will remember of this film. | Entertain with little recourse to extreme simplicity, golden rule to build a product aimed at the immediate divertimento, without worrying about if in 20 years someone will remember of this film. History of a rat who dreams of becoming something more than a simple rat, raised to the status of human gourmet and change the vision that human have the old clan, a clan of rodents beginning of petty thieves in a cottage, living on crumbs, and end up tasting culinary delights, by work and art of the rat who wanted to be different. Pixar Animation emphasizes the design and the visual force on the plot, something that is usual in their productions, and is convenient to emphasize that cartoonish character that combines very well the ingenuity in designs with a sentimentality carried with some dignity, since those levels which show an idyllic Paris in the eyes of a rat who was excited seeing the landscape, or the setting of the large dining room which makes the role of focus of the dramatic tension, because there comes a time in the plot in which fortune - or misfortune - actors, depends on the opinion of a culinary critic that even on the eve of the final recites a speech on the role of the critic as gourmet specialties (something applicable to various areas of creation)(, in this film, under the point of view of the above-mentioned critic, the cuisine is art), and it's worth saying that this characters is without doubt the most interesting, that the antipathy raised in principle by repulsive his characterization, derived in sympathy when, in a passage proustiano, a sporadic return to childhood because of the rustic flavours recovered by the ratIt transfiguring his sullen and malicious bearing an image of innocence and rediscovery. From that scene, the gesture changes and also the vision of things. There are certain parallels with Dickens, and we certainly have a film inspired by the good intentions, as it could not be otherwise.Little more can be said; a very correct film and you have a very effective characterization of characters functionally speaking, well structured, at times witty, and that keeps the interest at all times. It has good humor coups, although at other times it is something spectacular and wasteful. The resolution to the role of some characters is little inspired, and often plays too with topics, ideas and feelings we have seen nauseam in other films of similar intentions. Use the topics, by Jove, here at least not gooey. |
3,043 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3715 | Rafa Ferrer | Starship Troopers: Héroe de la federación | 1 | 5 | muchocine | If you can avoid her, better than best. | Framed as a pilot episode of a series, or shot to DVD or Video, this monstrosity of Z series (why not you can be described as otherwise) has been sold as "The second part of Starship Troopers" the magnificent film by Paul Verhoeven in 1997 based on the novel "Brigades space" by Robert Heinlein. It should be noted that when in a 90% film develops in darkness or night is that shortcomings!And it certainly has! The script is predictable, non-existent special effects and also mixed films, from "Alien" until "The invasion of the ultracuerpos" to "Hidden" and perhaps trying to give some action in the fighting of the humans against the insects without success, given that the film is perhaps more horrifying that you can find. The only original cast appears an actress that was secondary in the first movie, nor is it to ask you too to the tape, that as I said navigates between several genres, action, horror. A film that if you can avoid, better than best. |
3,044 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1791 | Pruden Rodríguez | Después de la boda | 5 | 5 | muchocine | A strange feeling keeps you glued to the seat when the credits are lost and you think that with them is gradually extinguished the magic minutes earlier made you feel completely mesmerized. After the wedding is painful, emotional, deep and hard... a masterpiece. | From time to time one leaves the film thinking that something has changed there outside. Or there inside, rather. A strange feeling keeps you glued to the seat when the credits are lost and you think that with them is gradually extinguished the magic minutes earlier made you feel completely mesmerized. After the wedding is painful, emotional, deep and hard. a masterpiece.Nominated for an Oscar in the category of best film of non-English speaking, the film's Director Susanne Bier (brothers, I want to always.) tells the story of Jacob, a lone wolf who devotes his life to help the children of Bombay, India. The economic difficulties that goes through the orphanage where he works make that it is forced to travel to his native country, Denmark, to negotiate the proposed donation an important business man is willing to do. You will soon see that Jorgen, the altruistic in question imposes strange conditions to gradually charged sense and force you to take the most important decisions of his life.After the wedding is above all a story of reunions: between people, between people and places to which belonged, between past and future. What we thought we had left behind sometimes reappears with an unsuspected strength. Each watchful secret opens a new world, a new range of possibilities. And, always, to open a door closes another. Jacob progresses, and we with him, through his past for approaching a crossroads that leaves choice good, but not bad. Less is more.This poignant drama (his detractors will say that it is a melodrama) supports its solid script in some intelligent dialogues, that give to the action of a lively pace and an ever-growing interest. I remember the first mirror gives the protagonist to reach Denmark, tired and skeptical. His companion, son-in-law of the wealthy Jorgen, says: "it came out of nowhere and now has a fortune." "Although no note", to which Jacob responds "that come out of nowhere?". The irony, sarcasm and the subtext are always present. But if something stands out beyond the argument and the theme is for the superb performances of all its protagonists. Especially bright are Mads Mikkelsen (Jacob) and Rolf Lassgard (Jorgen). No doubt much of the success of the work lies with them, as they are involved in making the hardest scenes of the film credible and emotive.In short, we are, to my mind, one of the best films of 2006. I am afraid that it will go unnoticed at the Spanish box office, but this is the type of stories that worth seeing movies. If you order something more than entertainment pure and hard, empty and meaningless, go to see her without hesitation. I personally reply to complaints, if any. |
3,045 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1485 | Rafa Ferrer | Asterix y los vikingos | 3 | 5 | muchocine | A happy review of the animated films we saw of kids. | I still remember every year at Easter, along with the films of the Bible and Jesus Christ, they added to the programming a film of Gallic heroes, "The twelve tasks of Asterix", "Asterix en Egypt". part of those movies that one has been seen sitting on the floor of House sipping a Nutella sandwich.This new installment could not be different, has the air then films, while the chavalería who settled the room nullify the few but strange jokes and is that where I saw the film, had only 2 available sessions in the film. (Gentlemen distributors, "elders" also loves the cinema of animation.) and all the "dwarves" populating the room and talked about the film, disservice they do these "future" film fans loudly.Finally, perhaps the only discordant note is that tone of "update" which has the film, with the dove of the protagonist, or the name of the Vikings (where there is up to an Ikea) out there around. a happy review of the animated films we saw of kids. |
3,046 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/33 | Darko | Secretos de familia | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Finally Rowan playing a role other than Mr. Bean | Rowan Atkinson stars in this comedy in the British style in which takes the role of a parish priest, Protestant pastor of a village lost in the English landscape. In this idyllic place it live in their community as the perfect priest. However, his absatracción of the world and its obsession to write a speech for an important Convention prevented see the adventure of his wife with the teacher of golf, the ease with which the daughter changes boyfriend or his son is not related with other guys rather than to receive beatings. It is then when arrives the new housekeeper (Maggie Smith), a |
3,047 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/900 | Jesus Lens | Casino Royale | 4 | 5 | muchocine | It boasts the best virtues of the saga of Bond, the classic substrate of the cinema of scams, tiles and tocar, scathing replicas of all good war of the sexes that self-respecting and that spatial and technological geography that shows us that we live in a fully globalized world. | It is true that I am not a big fan of 007, but it is truer still that I (almost) always see his films and arrival screens, when round us the Christmas, the welcome with more enthusiasm than the landing of advertising lotera or almond-shaped the nougat.The Bond franchise, with his collection of spectacular girls, its refinement, the locations of your dreams by way of catalogue of luxury travel to the Condé Nast and its globalized sophistication offer a solid and well finished product, but comes to excite, is always interesting, fun, entertaining and relaxing.So, when it was announced the premiere of this "Casino Royale" already I knew that, even without excessive eager haste, a good day I would fall by the cinema to see it, with popcorn, coke and other gadgets suitable for the tasting of a film of these features.The prologue in black and white, cynical and stark, already started to call me the attention more than the Bond films is normally the case. And the closing credits, animated, witty, imaginative. to continue with a first persecution of hair, a free and wild race by a building under construction that manages to convey all the sensation of dizzying speed to apply the two contenders and that it will be resolved with a crude murder, blood cold. We are told that we we have another type of Bond, a bit different.Craig has been called the Bond labor, popular and other things for the style. I do not want to enter now open the debate on the different types of Bond in the film have been or, above all, engage in what that Sean Connery was the best 007 ever when seen with the passage of time, those movies have been more stately than the sheep's milk cheese. This is: I liked, and much, this Craig and that scenes like that that, emulating John Wayne "The quiet man", gets under the shower and the water soaked you white shirt, are beautifully resolved.And the bad, course, another of the topics unavoidable when speaking of a Bond. The portrays this time, is so cold and cynical as credible and perfectly adapted to the times: a banker, bleaching of dirty money from the satrap and dealer anda by the world, bleed their victims. A guy who cries blood and that will make you sweat yours our 007, which reach torture in a simple way as cruel and ruthless.Do I liked that, instead of leaning on the path of the franchise of mission impossible, difficult and crazy action, "Casino Royale" has chosen to the spectacle on the sets? that Montenegro, that Venice and its Palazzo Hundiente. - but on the basis of a more credible direct action. always bearing in mind that we are talking about Bond, a James Bond who, by the way, just use gadgets or ingenious toys in this story.Agitated, which mixed and scrambled, "Casino Royale" is not a very good film that has a very good movie that possesses the best virtues of the saga of Bond, the substrate classic film of scams, tiles and tocar, replicas scathing of all good war of the sexes that self-respecting and that spatial and technological geography that shows us that we live in a totally globalized. And why, when it finishes playing the classic series theme, once Craig says for the first time about Bond, James Bond, at the end of the film, gives you a regustillo of the most friendly and satisfactory. |
3,048 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3883 | Ivan Villamel | Arma Fatal (Hot Fuzz) | 4 | 5 | muchocine | "Fatal weapon" undertakes to deny the fact that to find us with a parody so overused as the action film gender, should be treated with neglect or contempt for their own origins. | It is sometimes a difficult decision give him a chance to films as "Fatal weapon" ("Hot Fuzz" in its original title), and have the initiative of approaching the rooms and check-out probably even more. During the last years we have received, especially from USA, plenty of films which spoofed various genres, from comedy to horror, and also through the action genre. "Which, incidentally, has the gift, or call it as they wish, turn out to be tremendously popular, and remain in the collective imagination, not only arguably, but in the form of coletillas that everyone has in mind after seeing much of them.""Fatal weapon" undertakes to deny the fact that to find us with a parody (subtle, that Yes, but by no means less parody) gender as overused as action cinema, should be treated with neglect or contempt towards their own origins.There lies the great virtue of "Fatal weapon", part of the respect and admiration that causes its director and screenwriter (latter work with four hands with his usual actor Simon Pegg) genre action, to give a turn and through the subtlety create a perfect recreation of English humor, with a clear but at the same time subtle cynicism in his transfer to the screen.(The team creator of such notable film consists director Edgar Wright, also a writer with the aforementioned Pegg), and a regular cast in his movies, especially Simon Pegg and Nick Frost, always protagonists of their misadventures. Wright for this type of comedy talent was already evident for three years with no less great parody of the film zombies called "Shaun of the Dead" (called "Zombies Party" in its absurd Spanish title), which like the film before us showed us a few clichés of this type of film, to subvert them and bring them to the spoof ground, always from the respect, as in "Fatal weapon". Prior to that proposal, his popularity was already notable, especially in the UK, for a series that dates from the period of 1999-2001, of "Spaced" name, and which already contained the Basic constants of his film. His most recent work, after "Fatal weapon", try one of the fake trailers for Grindhouse Tarantino & Rodríguez (named "Don't"), and the already announced production "Ant-Man", about a biochemist that can communicate with the ants.The plot of the film we placed on the skin of Nicholas Angel, a model police of London whose perfection and high number of arrests creates envy in her own body of police, starting with his superiors. Nothing better than send him to a small village called Stanford, which is considered the more idyllic and people with fewer cases of violence and social disturbance of the place. Once there has as companion, after a revealing first involuntary taking of contact, an inept police name Danny, to help you try to demonstrate as much social perfection is not possible, and that beneath all this hides a bad latent and causing several considered fortuitous incidents by the majority.The work of Wright after the cameras is worthy of all praise, as already demonstrated in his previous proposal, knows how to move the camera with ease, and above all, how to create tension from the comedy, which usually failed by the majority of Directors, that either they are devoted to remain static in the Mise en scène, or fall into absolute mediocrity in that regard. With a simple script in their development, but while being effective, constant allusions to certain ICT action film, or even some burlesque vision of the life of provinces, occur at a pace slow and narrativamente impeccable. Nothing is spared in this film, since a parodic vision of the typical buddy movies (or films of fellow cops) Americans, until an own vision of very bloody British society.With constant allusions to such productions come from the USA, always subtle as discussed above, the own film becomes a voluntary homage full of love and understanding, while ironic film that parodies. As an example of where the shots in this British production, an enlightening scene in which Nicholas Angel (Simon Pegg), the polícia aimed at the small town of Stanford, and his partner Danny (Nick Frost) are preparing to see a double session of action cinema, so fond of is the latter to these productions go. The double session includes "Call him Bodhi" and "Two rebel cops", after Danny moved with scenes of the first (and try to Nick analyze the film from the point of view realistic police), when it comes to the second we see a plane in which at the moment of maximum tension fall asleep as a vindication of the film action before and a certain cynicism with a view put in the Michael Bay Film hipervitáminico. All this trying to the Viewer as it deserves, without absurd explanations or obvious jokes and therefore without minor grace (more or less as a whole series of "Scary Movie" style and sucedaneos, always so mediocre).The vision of some aspects of British society is not far behind, and the british lifestyle receives attacks everywhere in this production (made by British must not forget). From the stupidity of the police of people to squabbles caused in the British capital between the own companions of Nicholas Angel as this the epitome of the perfect police, without forgetting that all prototype of social and cordial relationship in that, apparently, idyllic town, is seen with very bad grapes (obligations by Sergeant go to stupid public events)(suspicious intentions of hiding any behavior outside the ordinary for not disturbing the peace of the town, etc). A great example of containment which should learn in certain places, some of them not very distant with prototypes of fascist cops and bad taste, as look at certain aspects of a society without falling into the film shabbiness with irony.The great work of the actors is very helpful to the verisimilitude of the characters, Simon Pegg is wonderful in its work of hard poly that hides an incommunicado and crushing loneliness, while Nick Frost is not far behind in an interpretation of a pariah of the police station, an incompetent fellow that, if it will teach his new friend of the capital value of little things. The appearance of Timothy Dalton in a comic role autoparódico (remember that this man was one of absolute paradigms of the action genre for a time with his role as James Bond in the 1980s), is histrionic in his concept of ancient icon of the genre.In short, a remarkable shows spoof film, although that Yes, subtle and intelligent most of scenes, a film that a server recommend going to see without waiting unnecessary histrionics by very contradictory as it may seem, to appreciate it in its fair measure. It is acceptable to admit that the last few minutes of the film have nothing to envy to any American action film production, in which nothing is safe, or viejecitas bike (don't miss that plane please, sensational), or kind of sellers, not even the priest of the village. While the film may be little transcendent and does not become a lasting film sample, if that fulfills its purpose more than, with dignity and a remarkable claim to have fun.Highly recommended, no doubt. |
3,049 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1983 | Ramón Besonias | Brick | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Brick is a desinflada by its budgetary scarcity and its teenage cast, which gives the film a sense of artifice that (to me at least) distracted and bored. | Why are the protagonists of the film noir of the 1940s characters such talluditos? Why not be reverted its directors by youngsters hairless chest, facial acne and easy laughter, or girls of smooth skin, size without cracks and Karasu experience? I guess that the essential reason is that the audience that filled the rooms at that time was equally mature and interested to find beings that could identify. Clear that those were other times, and the film noir was in charge of exorcise fears and hopes of a skeptical generation marked by the war.Thanks to this we can today enjoy a mythical genre that has had more than worthy followers, especially in the Nouvelle Vague and the American neo-noir of the nineties. The Nouvelle Vague gives the film noir narrative fluency and spontaneity and freshness and everyday life in its staging. Dialogues and scenarios are street, and his youth characters, faced with an aging society do not understand nor want. The skepticism of the generation between wars item is the rebellious Existentialism of a generation seeking their place in the world away from the map provided by their adult conservatives. Today times have changed. Cinemas populate teenagers looking for their dose of tits, romance and good special effects. And already do not seek outside their environment places where grow (advertising that avasalla them prefer them always young).Brick (in reference to the bricks of heroin that manufactures The Pin) inspires us the memory of the evolution of the black genre (and the hard-boiled Asia, with its urban gangs) who tries to always with effort reinvented in more or less successful formulas but without remission us back to their sources, making us resoplar: again will be!, well then! or I liked most of Bogart or Tarantino! Do is that? say the promoters and admirers of so-called independent cinema - the greatest success of this masterpiece of the young filmmaker Rian Johnson resides in having placed a genus designed for adult characters in a context of Californian teenagers playing terrible mafiosi, fatal girls or astute detectives. Everything seems very postmodern, but seasoned with a rather classic script: (occasional) detective in search of (his) lost girl, sensual fatal femme de dark intentions (crazy to throw to the detective), fearsome bully and eccentric mafia Chief). The characters are caricatures of cartoon, that only in brief instants manage to take a more solid form. Almost always when appear in scene the duo starred by a solvent and content Joseph Gordon-Levitt (how much I reminded Fele Martínez in thesis!) and this expressive eyes and conspirators doll called Nora Zehetner (seen by the heroes series). The others are to take them to sharks.I guess that it was precisely this amateurism what you caught the fancy of Sundance (special jury prize) and to the Sitges (Citizen Kane Award for best novel director). And is that Johnson manages to create feeling of closeness and freshness at the expense of a prepared script with MIME, but accentuated by the lack of budget (scenarios are scarce and repetitive). What we have (sure we will soon know) is to think that it would have done this filmmaker with a larger budget and a more adult story (in all senses).Brick is a desinflada by its budgetary scarcity and its teenage cast, which gives the film a sense of artifice that (to me at least) distracted and bored. A pity, because their intimate scenes (the discovery of the corpse in the tunnel, calls to his girlfriend, encounters with Nora Zehetner) promised that eventually becomes as a seasoned puzzle of endless punches. Even so is a success (own all postmodern product) offer an unusual collage that combines film noir with characters that populate even by the Institute (in fact Johnson filmed at the school attended by small), despite seem so theatrical and forced. Discover teenager roles that not fluctúen between coarse humor, precast terror, or the romance pastry chef, is almost a miracle that should be protected by UNESCO.I guess everyone who see Brick will be hoping that Johnson will make us enjoy soon a force stronger and darker than this (and perhaps without so much testosterone derrochada). Apparently it has more than proven resources. In process is which seems that The Brothers Bloom, a triangular noir, with two brothers (Adrien Brody and Mark Buffalo) and an unreliable partner (Rinko Kikuchi, the excellent sordomuda of Babel) will be called. Complete the cast always great Rachel Weisz. |
3,050 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1749 | Florinda Chic | Alpha Dog | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Love the youth drug. Cassavetes could not hide certain sympathy by these errant and the sticks are for parents. It shows them as protectors or as desapegados. Parents who have never seen an chapter of SOS adolescents. | Nick Cassavetes returns the address, after the empalagosa the diary of Noa with Alpha Dog, a history of independent air based on a real event, which starred Jesse James Hollywood, a juvenile which in the film is called with a name no less film: Johnny Truelove.La film shows us a group of young Californian of more insane in their vices that are so poor who do not have more than money. A bad day they decide to kidnap the little brother of a type which owes them a few thousand dollars and what was a game of urba thugs becomes a sudden entry into the events pages.Cassavetes could not hide certain sympathy by these errant and the sticks are for parents. It shows them as protectors or as desapegados. Parents who have never seen an chapter of SOS adolescents and interpret Bruce Willis and Sharon Stone. The worst thing about the film is the spirit of docudrama about interviews with family members that Cassavetes wanted to increase the drama and give credibility to the story, but on the basis of the story is already itself a drama and that is based on a real event, are over.Do and if something more than enough you is undoubtedly the? mucus interview? that stars Sharon Stone engordada by grace of the make-up artists appearing with a radical change which rather seems the blonde relative of the Eddie Murphy Klump family and more laugh what a shame.The brat pack is superb and even Justin Timberlake. The boy is credible and looks multitatuaje and what is best, not sing. |
3,051 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/71 | Victor Omar | The Descent | 4 | 5 | muchocine | A true gem filmed with intelligence and passion | The film focuses on a practice that increasingly has largest number of followers: the escalation and, more specifically, caving. Inside a cave, safe and familiar environment for fans to this activity, becomes a claustrophobic microuniverso for those who are not: canyons, tunnels, underground caverns of twisted layout that must be overcome with effort and skill to reach the other side and see the light of day again.Not to mention all kinds of animals, insects and vermin living in the dark, non-action human. "The descent" follows a group of six women using their free time in a unconventional way, to add excitement to their normal and pleasant lives.His previous expedition went to the rapids of a river, which ended in tragedy for one of them. And now, a year later, they become reunited, this time to explore a cave system little known under the Appalachian mountains, in the Unidos.Pero States things start to go wrong when a landslide blocks the only way of input/output. They will then have to dominate your panic, and their personal conflicts, to find another route. Which won't be so easy when they discover may not be alone in the dark cave.There are two distinct in the film parts. In the first half we know the city girls who are looking for adventures in the caves of the Appalachian mountains and accompany them in a relaxed first decline, which allows to better know each character; in the second part, the events become in tragedy, the tension gives way to a rapid and violent survival horror in which "something" mortally stalks women.The great skill of the filmmaker is trying each section of the footage a radically different way, perfectly maintaining the pace from beginning to end and used the upheavals and the violence with success. The director and screenwriter Neil Marshall ("Dog Soldiers", a notable unpublished Opera prima by these directions), has done an excellent job in both fields.Its libretto is composed of interesting characters and dynamic relationships, the actresses transmitted without any effort, showing facets of their personalities without excessive dialogues. Now, however, no mistake, the film is far from original.In fact, it is not hard to find traces of other jewels of the celluloid of terror, from the design of the creatures, inspired in equal parts in Murnau Nosferatu and the Gollum in Peter Jackson, in his bowels (and never better), until all the spectacle of carnage directly imported from the 70s of the great masters gore: Romero, Wes Craven or even Tobe Hopper.Lo that occurs is that Neil Marshall orders and stimulates the batidillo ideasconcepts and tributes, so compactly that the result, far from the postmodern aesthetic to which we are unfortunately so accustomed, approaching its creation the shores of the classicism of gender.An atmosphere of genuine heart, a creepy makeup which demonstrates the physical convinces more than digital when it comes to scaring the Viewer, a disturbing as few sound treatment, and even some timid but convincing Conatus to grant some psychological depth to the characters, complete the litany of virtues of "The Descent", a film that, if enjoy horror moviesthey are not caused by donating blood and are tolerant with dilated starts in excess, they should see by Decree of law.We have one of the best films of terror for many years, with surprises, shocks, characters very well defined and an unforgettable final. Visually powerful and frightening, is vision must-have for all fans of horror B movies made with quality. A true gem filmed with intelligence and passion. |
3,052 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/969 | Oscar Cantero | El código Da Vinci | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Preceded by a propagandistic device worthy of Goebbels became one of the most disappointing taquillazos in recent years. | There is no doubt that the film version of the novel by Dan Brown is one of the most anticipated in recent times. The unprecedented success of the book, enhanced by calls for a boycott from more conservative sectors of Catholicism, no doubt led to the expectation before the imminent release of the film reached unimaginable heights. If we add to all this that the protagonist is Tom Hanks, the end result is a product whose film value dwarfs against the social significance reaches. And I say this because the code da Vinci is a film that is well set, creates a halo of mystery around its settings and characters, and at times it dazzles the Viewer, especially who has not read the book. But in general it is an excessively slow, pretty long movie (almost two and a half hours) and pay attention to which just costing work. The argument of some that say not you to know, that it is a faithful adaptation of the best-selling American author. Grosso modo, Robert Langdom reaches Paris, invited by the curator of the Louvre, which appears dead in the museum itself surrounded by enigmatic symbols and in a strange position. A from there everything was bursting and the protagonist, accompanied by the granddaughter of the slain begin an adventure that leads them to where the fantasy of Dan Brown wanted to be. I would like to stress this point because it seems that at times people forget that the code da Vinci is not a history book, which is only a novel. In short, I think that could have been a better product, and that it will be a huge success at the box office in its premiere, but that word of mouth will end up harming him. He was disappointed. |
3,053 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1720 | Iñaki Bilbao | El hombre del carrito | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Unconditional love until death. A story of impossible love that acongoja from the beginning until the end, unforgettable. A lesson in excellent film. | Splendid film by Hiroshi Inagaki, of the "samurai", full of virtues, both films, as human.It is funny and touching at the same time, making the viewer experience the adventures of the protagonist as our own, despite his rudeness and ignorance.Some endearing characters in their overflowing humanity, which must live on a daily basis in peace, being trustworthy and honest, over the years (we are at the beginning of the 19th century).Excellent performances, where stands out, once again, the great Toshiro Mifune, a giant of the dramatic composition, perfect in its intensity and its containment.Moments like the endurance race, or when you touch the drum of Gion, they are wonderful, as well as the beautiful photography and impeccable and beautiful costumes.A story of impossible love that acongoja from the beginning until the end, unforgettable. A lesson in excellent film.This film won the Golden Lion at the Venice Festival in 1958. |
3,054 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2437 | Oscar Cantero | Chuecatown | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Vulgar movies, reminiscent of Mariano Ozores. Stereotypes, anachronisms and lack of ingenuity. To then say that Spanish cinema lost viewers because it is not promoted. | Starring Pepón Nieto, Concha Velasco, Rosa María Sardá and Pablo Puyol, among others, Chuecatown tells the story of a pair of homosexuals to be unwittingly is linked to a mobster who kills elderly women who occupy certain houses, with the intention of reforming them and sell them at high prices to young people and wealthy.The line to misery of the spectator, prevailing in the Spanish light comedy, Chuecatown employs a humor full of clichés, vulgar, lacking in originality and extremely predictable, with some characters caricatured in excess and a script full of gaps and defects of form.The histrionics is the prevailing note in the characterization of the characters, and both Pepón Nieto and Pablo Puyol bordering the ridiculous at times, while Rosa María Sardá demonstrates once again that it is capable of playing all kinds of roles.Perhaps its director Juan Flahn, you somehow wanted to demonstrate that homosexuality is one subject like any other, and that can be used in any context. But certainly, disservice has done to normalize using few stereotypes can underpin today in the minds of a citizenship which can be seen in this film more reminiscent of Mariano Ozores than anything else. Except, obviously, that at the time of the destape productions were financed by private capital in almost all, while we now have a cinema subsidized from all conceivable sectors. Perhaps having guaranteed repayment of the production before start, is the cause that led to the Spanish to the progressive and slow film, unstoppable, but loss share of screen, fund-raising, and the interest of viewers seeking something more than a nude or an exaggerated darse. |
3,055 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3833 | Luna | No es país para viejos | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Bardem or the psychotic gunman of the Coen brothers. No country for old men, or as they have translated it here, it is not a country for old men, will become one of the movies that we should not lose sight of the Spanish chart of 2008. | Dir: Joel and Ethan CoenInt: Tommy Lee Jones, Javier Bardem, Josh Brolin, Woody Harrelson, Kelly Macdonald violence begets violence and no matter where I try to hide, the weight of your actions will always return to give you a kick in the ass. This could summarize the plot of the last film by the Coen brothers. After finding the remains of a shooting by chance, an average American (Josh Brolin), of those living in a caravan in the country of the bars and stars, find a Briefcase full of money and decides what it. But as no action remains unpunished, he discovered and sent to a psychotic gunman (Javier Bardem) to hunting.From the first frame we discovered cinema in its purest form and a story, written by the own directors, who you will be catching more and more. It is not what you have, it's a story that you've probably seen more than once, but how have. A reflective look at revenge, violence, through a deliberate, thoughtful and fast-paced rhythm at the same time.In addition to his good work from the point of view of the realization, the Coen brothers have genuine talent for the direction of actors and achieve some impeccable interpretations that undoubtedly will reap many awards (not in vain Javier Bardem is nominated to Golden Globe for the role). The Coen brothers we discover a more visceral Bardem than of custom and highlight that this actor has many nuances, because in their role as we discover a dark and stinky background that we had not seen him on screen. Behind a mask of inexpressiveness, are the eyes of Bardem which tell us about the character. With a great expressive economy Bardem composed one of the most memorable roles, that without a doubt, will be a gap in the history of cinema.It is not the only one which is superb in its interpretation. All manage to compose credible characters through the expressive restraint. I would like to highlight also the interpretation of Tommy Lee Jones in the role of police and voice of experience, which provides the viewer the narration of the story from another point of view.The picture an ochre, red and brown tones of Roger Deakins (usual picture of the Coen director) and the music by Carter Burwell (another of the usual Coen) conform as ring to the finger at this story, becoming perfect tools to provide the same greatest echoes of verismo and depth.No country for old men, or as they have translated it here, it is not a country for old men, will become one of the movies that we should not lose sight of the Spanish chart of 2008. |
3,056 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3161 | Ana Belén Pacheco | Lío embarazoso | 2 | 5 | muchocine | They are counted humor points divided by an extremely long footage, almost pretentious and boring. There is no intelligent humor but not come to profane humor becoming a hybrid between Superbad and nine Meses.Una quite ridiculous tape not just decide between comedy, drama and romance. | Many films used as leifmotiv staying pregnant "accidentally" in the field of comedy. Embarrassing mess (Knocked Up translated literally as leave pregnant) is not different from its predecessors. Katherine Heigl television makes a mistake of one night of those who become lifelong trauma messing with a complete stranger without profession or benefit when his television career is about to take off.When he discovers that there is a baby on the way the two decide to go ahead with the pregnancy and try to maintain a relationship.The main problem of this comedy is that so that it conforms with this term should be implied have some grace. They are counted humor points divided by an extremely long footage, almost pretentious and boring. There is no intelligent humor but also reaches the profane humor becoming a hybrid between Superbad and nine Meses.La film already released on DVD at United States and suggests that you reached the European continent late accompanying the success of Grey's Anatomy as a better means of promotion (in fact in the original poster for the film only appeared Seth Rogen (will anyone recognize it as the police of Superbad) and the legend of "Of creators") (from Virgin to the 40 "). But these references two little is a pretty ridiculous tape not just decide between comedy, drama and romance. |
3,057 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/743 | Jose Luis | Volver | 4 | 5 | muchocine | One of the best films of Almodóvar, very close to all about my mother, perhaps with time receiving the recognition it deserves. | There is who is receiving the new film by Pedro Almodóvar with enough lukewarm, perhaps that she does not appear Gael García dressed women, do not have scenes explicit sex, or talks about a rough topic and morbidly in vogue. On the contrary, Almodóvar, in a pure State, removes all excesses to which we are accustomed in their cinema and focuses on tell us a strong and touching story about the strength of women, the family and women's loyalty.The tape begins when Raimunda, his sister solitude and his daughter visit the grave of his parents and to his sick aunt in his hometown. There is the legend that the dead are returning to life to help his family and meet some outstanding in that picturesque town. Soon solitude and Raimunda will have to decipher if this is actually true or if they are just old tales? that there are some issues in requiring help.The tape goes straight to the point, the script is drained with energy and strength, revealing little by little, revealing his true nature? This is a story of black humor, it is drama, melodrama, surreal is? Perhaps is a bit of everything, less surreal, that perhaps this is the tape more attached to reality, at least the most likely of all the varied filmography manchego Director.The solid group of actresses, all of them are fairly accurate, form an unbeatable team on the screen than the same pass without much effort from the fun to touching, all commanded by a memorable character, in charge of Penelope Cruz, as a strong woman, determined, "heavy" as her would describe his sister, a beautiful woman, who instead of sitting down to cry face of difficultyput hands to work and solve any problem with wisdom and speed with which a housewife orderliness in his kitchen.The colorful picture shows a Spain different from the rest of the films of Almodóvar, a modern, globalized and diverse Spain, where young women are coupled to your cell phone, and Latino immigrants give a new flavour, a Spain where they appear suddenly in a single shot men of color. And all this combined with the rural environment of the manchega Earth saw birth Almodóvar, and that no doubt influenced cinematically speaking, to date. A barren land, where the wind blows hard all the time governed mainly by women.And there is in this town where occurs a very memorable scene, where dozens of women in black, try to listen to the legends, presenting his condolences to the mourners and pray at the same time.In summary, and in my very particular point of view, one of the best films of Almodóvar, very close to all about my mother, perhaps eventually receive the recognition it deserves. |
3,058 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2359 | Rafa Ferrer | Charlie y la fábrica de Chocolate | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Finally, 100% tape Burton to as Spielberg "a.i." is a good piece of footage. | He even had fresh memories of "A world of fantasy" which starred Gene Wilder and not long ago I saw DivX overnight comfortably on the couch at home, they said that the Burton film was more faithful to the book of what was this film of 1971, although once I saw the only remake I can say that the original I liked much moreIt is true that in this musical numbers are only conducted the Oompa Loompas and that the previous "he sang until the pointer", however, this one film arrives almost drowned before both spirit Burton (the film is 100% Tim Burton) and it is even easy to find references ranging from "Planet of the apes" passing by "Nightmare before Christmas" and even "Edward Scissorhands" (this last more than anything by the Danny Elfman Score)(, that is with Burton a binomino inseparable).It is true that the movie is a plea to this fantasy world created by Roald Dahl (I recommend to keep an eye on the book) but. Not arrive to the feeling that the tape can spare you almost 15 min.? Perhaps I'm making more. (Cachis).Finally, 100% tape Burton to as Spielberg "a.i." is a good piece of footage. |
3,059 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2148 | Patri | Melinda y Melinda | 2 | 5 | muchocine | It could have been a very interesting movie, with two parallel stories, another comedy and a drama, but the problem is that the comedy does not laugh and the drama is not so dramatic. | Melinda and Melinda is not of the best films of Woody Allen, although the approach is very good, fails to achieve its objective. It could have been a very interesting movie, with two parallel stories, another comedy and a drama, but the problem is that the comedy does not laugh and the drama is not so dramatic, so at the end so there are two stories quite bland and predictable, without any interest.Sometimes not appreciated the difference between two frames, because there is enough humor in the comedy, despite having the comedian Will Ferrel, who is the only one that makes any grace. The drama is not tragic, because the Viewer fails to engage with the protagonist and therefore gives us just what happens.This film showed great promise but is disappointed to realize that there are times in which Woody Allen doesn't know to do comedy, better keep the memory of Match Point, a jewel. |
3,060 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3867 | Moebius | Harry el sucio | 4 | 5 | muchocine | "Dirty Harry" was one of the best moments in the career of director Don Siegel, and definitively consecrated Clint Eastwood as a movie star and screen tough guy. | He was one of the detective films that revolutionized the genre in the early 1970s. They have a filipino Department requested a copy for use as training. It was one of the best moments in the career of director Don Siegel, and consecrated definitely Clint Eastwood as a movie star and screen tough guy. He popularized the 44 Caliber Magnum pistol. It raised protests and sensitivities, and many accused her of offering a fascist and violent vision of the world of crime and police. It is, in short, an unavoidable classic in the history of the cinema. Do you feel lucky, punk?The original story belonged to Harry Julian and Rita Fink, which together with the writer and filmmaker Dean Riesner outlined a draft of the script. There are sources to ensure that the inspiration for the story of Dirty Harry came from the crimes of the Zodiac killer was taking place at that time.Initially thought Frank Sinatra for the lead role and names is considered such as Irving Kershner to direct it. Sinatra finally fell from the project due to an injury in a doll, which the producers felt then in John Wayne, who apparently was not too interested, although paradoxically some years later would a à là film star Harry Callahan entitled McQ. Apparently it was Paul Newman who led in the right direction to those responsible for casting. Without a doubt, Clint Eastwood was the man.Eastwood agreed and soon attracted director Don Siegel to the project. Actor and director had worked together in three films, and that same year Siegel had collaborated on the debut as director of Eastwood, Play Misty For Me. The action moved to San Francisco, and the writers and directors Terrence Malick and John Milius gave the finishing touches to the script. It could not be otherwise, the most famous phrases from the film, especially that famous scene on the bullets, the Magnum pistol and other, they emerged from the Republican mind of following Milius.El step was finding the perfect candidate to interpret the murderer, Scorpio. Initially the chosen candidate was Audie Murphy, the most decorated American soldier of World War II, which had subsequently become actor. However Murphy fallacería in a plane crash. On the recommendation of Eastwood, the director called the actor Andrew Robinson. Without a doubt, Robinson was the perfect candidate, I can't imagine a guy like Murphy being able to show so psychotic on the screen. The test of the great work he did Robinson was that after premiering the film had to change your phone number to a private, because it began to receive death threats.A veteran as Don Siegel, who had already previously worked in the genre, showed their knowledge do, making one of his finest works. The film opens with a dedication to San Francisco agents killed in Act of service. Hence, we come to the image of the barrel of a rifle pointing directly to the camera. The impact of the image is a perfect Overture to a Symphony of violence and killings.When the sniper kills his victim, a beautiful young woman swimming in a pool, the next level introduces the character of Eastwood, Harry Callahan, wearing sunglasses and leaving a door to the scene of the crime. It is then when they begin to appear the credits and the fantastic music by Lalo Schifrin. Also the work of Argentinian composer marked a guideline for films and later series.Siegel plays with big and small spaces, opening and closing the camera field, using short levels and means for the scenes of fighting and clashes between Scorpio and Callahan, being almost always preceded and followed by a general level, defining in some way encounters between the two main characters.A close-up of the scale model of the city of San Francisco becomes a floorplan of the Church represented at that. Excellent step to another unforgettable scene, where Robinson and Schifrin shine with their own light. Cross the Park to the stadium of football, beginning and end of the first great encounter between Callahan and Scorpio. It is the stadium where Siegel offers in an unforgettable level: zoom away while opens the level, at the same time the violent police torture their prey, the ruthless Scorpio.Y is that Callahan and Scorpio are one side of the same coin. They are expeditious, and do not hesitate to use violence to achieve their aims. Only one is on the side of the law. They are therefore accountable less ominous, more acceptable? Everyone you see the movie and draw their own conclusions.It's funny to think that Robinson was a declared pacifist who didn't like of weapons; all an antithesis of Milius, for example. It reached the point that Siegel had to suspend filming so that an expert in weapons work with Robinson to ensure that it does not close the eyes or put faces of fear by shooting. Although this indicates how great actor who is Robinson, that being diametrically opposite could offer a performance so alive and intimidating. Well, do so are actors, not? The sadistic Scorpio became its own right one of the final villains of the film. And if Robinson had problems with weapons, Eastwood didn't put many hesitate to make himself the dangerous scenes, including the leap from the bridge to the bus. The San Francisco actor was also in charge of replacing Siegel when he fell ill. The endearing the suicide scene was directed by the own Eastwood.Harry the dirty caused (and I think that still cause) a great impact. In the early 1970s, it was not normal to have a protagonist who was violent to the usual way in which were the villains. The murderous psychopath, therefore he could not but be worse, being capable of torturing, killing, hitting children. the young girl kidnapped in this case would not be saved.Graphic violence had to add brief but stunning nude, including any full, and a scene so unusual and terrible as original and already mythical. I refer to the particular "session" of $200 which is Scorpio. Really sublime.Moreover, there was Eastwood, "Man without name", and an assassin to catch, and a poor fellow that went live in miracle. A Chief scolds, a policeman that dictates its own rules, the mayor who complains. they are mostly archetypal characters that have populated since the majority of series and films that followed the trail of Harry Callahan.La shadow of Dirty Harry was, and is still very long, and his influence persists in many current films of policemen. Some tapes even took borrowed directly some of the most emblematic scenes of the film by Siegel. For example, lethal weapon and his suicidal crazy, or the third part of the Crystal jungle, with Bruce Willis going cabin cabin at the expense of the evil and repeinado Jeremy Irons. And it is one of the major findings of the screenplay for Dirty Harry is that part that Harry, charge the money from taxpayers to Scorpio, makes the breath running from a phone booth to another, waiting for the call from the crazy sniper. Of course, could not close this entry in any other way other than with the phrase from the movie: I know what you're thinking. If thugs just five or six bullets. The truth is that with all this hustle and bustle also I've lost count. But this being a 44 Magnum, the best gun in the world, able to fly you the brains of a shot, do not you think that you should think that you're lucky? |
3,061 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2564 | Rafa Ferrer | Los Simpson: La Película | 5 | 5 | muchocine | A tape essential see, fans of the characters of Matt Groening, both of which they are not and one purchase more than insured on DVD. | One of the summer films expected with more desire and, a priori, one of which gave me more fear, and is that, I wasn't entirely convinced that after 400 episodes (that is said soon but they encompass 20 years of series), the film could preserve the freshness, the interest and humor, the series which had for so long, so that one bought the entry fearing that, under the wrapper of the Simpsons, we encontraramos with some tiny quality y.No has been so, the film from beginning to end is a bright reinvention of the series and a continuation of what we have seen for so long on the small screen, able to maintain not only the interest from beginning to end, but that there are also plenty of winks towards the fans more geeks series.And it is, from the cameos, from Tom Hanks to Arnold Schwarzennegger, passing by Greenday or Hillary Clinton, all, again, have room in the film, adding to the characters we already know.Ah! a note, Fox made running the rumor, of everything that appeared in the trailer had nothing to do with the movie, sadly is not so.On the other hand, I foresee that FOX has been a Philo to explode the yellow characters, and can (perhaps can) that within a year or even 2 are again in the cinema watching the new adventures of Homer, Lisa, Bart, Marge and Maggie.Resumiendo, a tape must see for fans of the characters of Matt Groening, which they are not and one purchase more than guaranteed (at least on my part) on DVD. |
3,062 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/86 | Jose Contreras | Truman Capote | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Capote is stinky feeling that one has to survive have to bait the rich | Capote, again, the question me of whether cinema can remain neutral with the reality. "Recently I saw in"7 virgins"to an unnamed rogue trying to force a girl of 12 years in front of a camera unperturbed, flaccid, a suspuestamente camera"objective".""Is that that is the reality," I say, "Who is the filmmaker to change anything?" It seems impossible to me a so easy to answer question: is a human being.Capote tells the story of a best seller. Truman Capote reads in the newspaper about a massacre in the State of Kansas and moves to follow the process closely. Known to the victims, known to the police. The murderers are captured in a short time. The writer gets to them. Get to delay the death sentence by hiring lawyers of luxury that they draw up appeals and arrive to the Kansas Supreme Court, the Federal Court?Capote not trafficking in that stinky feeling that one has that in the U.S. only only die executed the poor. Capote's stinky feeling that one has to survive in this world have to bait the rich. The writer maintains alive the two murderers because you need to know that awful night. You need to know that morbid world walking by the sensational programs and the gossip. Lengthens the life of the murderer as well as the audience takes account of income for those who give him bait.But Capote is a neutral film. The camera does not condemn what you see, everything seems right, or wrong, according as you look at it. Anything goes; same as a violation. If the camera at an angle it may violate a girl and nothing happens. What I say is that neutrality is unmentionable connivance with the executioner; and is not tolerable when there are victims. |
3,063 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1759 | Caruco | Pequeña miss sunshine | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Between the socarronería and the black humor, this Miss Sunshine has a really bright start to lose much of its bellows to half an hour. An irregularity and a slump that no dates until the final sequences. | Perhaps it is not in the land of opportunity? And the success and beauty isn't the great ambition? So is the youngest of seven years Olive (Abigail Breslin), whose dream is to the win one of the many beauty contests which are organised to the length and breadth of the United States.UU. She is nice, not lacking in attractive, but rather plump and, physically, the lot. And in its goal, it will drag his entire varied family.Do do climbing the rickety van yellow Wolkswagen, no less apedazada Hoover family emprendrerá a peculiar journey which, as in any? road movie? who boasts, will be also initiation, of self-discovery of each and end of trip for any other.But you can expect with the crew to a grandfather who sniffed cocaine (in the face of the veteran and tanning Alan Arkin), a father who hides his mediocrity and failure giving lessons on how to succeed in life (Greg Kinnear); a gay guy who has tried to sucidarse because of a love failure (Steve Carell); a teenage brother who refuses to talk (Paul Dano), and a mother who is not obliged to put some sesantez in a family so bundled (Toni Collette).Towing them to California to discover the value of be yourself and know to be attached to your closest beings in a not always easy coexistence.And, by the way, tell a story of losers, even long before reaching maturity, as the brother of 15 years who has done? vow of silence? and you want to join the forces of aviation; or reel the same Olive.Hasta off, completed the pilgrimage, a criticism of beauty contests and the American dream, ridiculed in that scene, which is worth the entire film, of the final performance of the small Olive to a shocked audience. All a provocation which however makes clear how they teach and used from earliest childhood, the cult of the body and superficiliad models.Speeches, on the other hand, not especially innovative, or culminados in a particularly risky manner, but that gives us moments and phrases anthologies as grandfather Hoover to Olive's: "A loser is someone who is so afraid of winning of truth that not even try."Between the socarronería and the humor black, this Miss Sunshine and the strange family has a really bright start to lose much of its bellows to half an hour. An irregularity and a slump that no dates until the final sequences.But a comedy, at the end and after, peculiar directed by the (seems that) well avenido marriage composed by Jonathan Dayton and Valerie Faris, and which not only became the surprise of the Oscar, but also in the American independent production of last season, harvesting also millions of supporters. |
3,064 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1676 | Yojimbo | Paris je t'aime | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Arguably, it is the perfect candidate to like everyone. At least in some fragments. There are all kinds. Less gore. I think. | Collective works are converted into refuge and sample of concentrated talent of some directors. A film composed of 18 short films directed by filmmakers from more disparate is a good entertainment and a continuous surprise. What history I now count? And for which they did not have the possibility of seeing the film with the initial signs of each short who will direct this story? Paris and love. Synonyms. With that premise is organized a film with all love stories. Newly married couples and well divorced marriages. I wish and conquer. Brutal and shy love. All of this can be found in this collective work in which Wes Craven and Isabel Coixet directed. Olivier Assayas and Alexander Payne. Directed by Tom Tykwer and Vincenzo Natali.Me is difficult to do a review on a movie with so many independent stories. Obviously does not speak for all of them, but if you say that they intended to be a kaleidoscope of love, fraternal relations, paternofiliales, the home of all or the end of a vital stage.Arguably, it is the perfect candidate to like everyone. At least in some fragments. There are all kinds. Less gore. Creo.parece the film travels with copies made in a different way. Which I could watch had no initial posters, so it was added an entertainment: guess who might be each short.I particularly prefer the stories directed by Oliver Schmidt and Tom Tykwer.Y for those who have seen what are yours? |
3,065 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3791 | Alvaro Oliva | 1408 | 2 | 5 | muchocine | A film for lovers of John Cusack and the stories of Stephen King, which disappoint the more ambitious and the horror film enthusiasts, and that will conform to the moviegoers less demanding. | Again a proposal which, a priori, given us fear. As well, it does not. Based on a short story by Stephen King master, "1408" presented us to Mike Enslin (John Cusack), a horror writer who comes to all hotels that are supposedly ghosts. Bored of not come up with any, reaches Enslin a postcard on the room 1408 in the Dolphin hotel, in which many people have died. So our protagonist is presented with the intention of finding and living unexplained facts. Samuel l. Jackson makes his appearance as the mysterious hotel manager. From here, Cusack will have to face (solo) to almost all of the footage, which will attempt to resist in a room where no one holds live over one hour. Taking different references between the great films of the genre, Mikael Hafstrom, it presents a room in which begin to happen strange things. With some disturbing point, the film takes place on the path of normalcy without being nothing out of this world, and deflate slowly, until you reach a "final" with surprise, to subsequently leave us the sweetened "The End" so much like. In short, a film for lovers of John Cusack and the stories of Stephen King, which disappoint the more ambitious and the horror film enthusiasts, and that will conform to the moviegoers less demanding. |
3,066 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4318 | Iñaki Bilbao | Los burdeles de Paprika | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Bad erotic film the good of Tinto Brass, a director who, from time to time, delights us with some good moments in his filmography (no, not occurs in this dreadful film). | "Paprika is the pseudonym of a sensual girl who, to earn money for her boyfriend, gets bitch (reportedly in the film a lot of times) in a brothel where, from the first day, will begin a successful"career"which will take you to different brothels in different Italian cities of late 1970s".Bad erotic film the good of Tinto Brass, a director who, from time to time, delights us with some good moments in his filmography (no, not occurs in this dreadful film).Nature, pseudohistoric, to portray the last moments of the life of the great brothels in the Italy of the 1980s, shortly before the Government ordered to close them, is also, in fact, a movie very, very, very boring.Dialogs are arduous, even if there are any more or less successful puya about the Church and its relationship with the aforementioned brothels, and interpretations are penalty.We can even say that the protagonist is pretty or beautiful, because it has the wrinkled ass and rather ugly teeth.That Yes, has two nice tits, as it shows over and over again Tinto, and total outrageous for despelotar the smaller occasion (well, not her, if not his character).Some very ornate decorated the various brothels, have its one and is responsible for the artistic direction have currado theirs, but the rest is a chorrrada of volume and spine, becoming heavy and endless, since, if the above out, is very long. And note, go if you notice! |
3,067 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1285 | Rafa Ferrer | La fuente de la vida | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Explain the film with words is complicated. It is not easy to understand, but it is an amazing movie that is worth discovering. | It is not to be passionate about the Darren Aronofsky film, I saw "Requiem for a dream" and stop you have, especially when at the end of this a sense of "bad roll" I invaded during at least 3 or 4 days, so not left me wanting to go diving in the Filmography of the director, until in a press pass someone I spoke of "The Fountain" (the source of life)praising the virtues of Aronofsky as the master performances of Hugh Jackman and the wife of the director, Rachel Weisz.Explicar the film with words it is complicated, it is a story that takes place in 3 different times (past, present and future) and where the search for eternal life is the crux of the matter, the past and the present are easy to understandthe future, I personally was a cousin face tremendous and even though I gave round little, to say nothing, I have come to understand; It is true that perhaps, and based only on view images, is one of the most poetic films which I have faced as a viewer; Perhaps much more than "perfume", which distilled poetry in almost all of their footage.On the other hand, and noise level, Aronofsky repeats Kronos Quartet, so that ritmillo I already met in "Requiem for a dream" is becoming, soundly marks from the House of the director, accompanying not only sincere and logical what happens on screen, but that musically (if closed eyes and only escucharamos music), leads to a different universe.Both interpretive level Jackman as Weisz are excellent, will have to take up the cudgels in favour of Hugh, who always saw on-screen as Wolverine and which could not separate the interpretation in X-Men the rest of roles that saw him interpret; Weisz is case aside, I've always liked and found me a great (on par with precious) actress.Finally, it is not easy to understand, but it is an amazing film which is worth discovering. |
3,068 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1974 | JLO | Monsieur Verdoux | 5 | 5 | muchocine | The end is one of the most beautiful of his filmography, as lucidly defined great analyst André Bazin: Chaplin makes us witnesses and participants in the death of the great Charlie, at the hands of a society already uninterested about the fate of the erstwhile, Idol of the masses. | To continue hitting strong after a controversial predecessor film, also still hurt by the advance of the talkies, stripped of the character of the tramp, Chaplin plays being washed face on this occasion a murderer of women. Of course that with style and good taste expected. A kind of cynical blue beard modern, skillful and seductive. One original idea by another big as Orson Welles Chaplin birlara you with your consent.Using the ellipsis as simple and beautifully as possible as in the successive murders, and sometimes with only a subtle opening and closing of doors. That happened up to his own family?. only Verdoux knows this. Politics provides the inclusion of true - then - fall of the stock market, and as a mere malefactor is judged with the force of law when a mass - Hitler by case - murderer is completely ignored. The end is one of the most beautiful of his filmography, as lucidly defined great analyst André Bazin: Chaplin makes us witnesses and participants in the death of the great Charlie, at the hands of a society already uninterested about the fate of the erstwhile, Idol of the masses.OK, Chaplin "kills" the Tramp and all fall on him is by far his most criticized and rejected - film, but there are no account which now ceases to be shielded in the myth, entering other "reality"; making this a much more personal and risky work. Perhaps the best film of Charles Spencer Chaplin? In my opinion it is, followed closely by the great dictator. In other words, safety pin.Summary: Verdoux successively marries a rich women who then kills her to stay with their money, thereby helping to his son and invalid wife. Their false names and their mock culminate when it is recognized by relatives of his victims, and decides to surrender. "Black" film, ahead of several years to his time. |
3,069 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/514 | Tito Chinchan | Ant bully | 3 | 5 | muchocine | It is too similar to many others, especially AntZ and even affection I have shrunk to children. In short, entertainment for the kids of the House, which can be seen by adults. | When I saw the poster hesitate what were these bugs on which flies the protagonist. Once completed it, not be if they are dragonflies or bees or wasps. More sinister aspect, since then.The film is a young child who is marginalized in your neighborhood by a bully and his Schleifer's henchmen. In addition to this, he has a family that does not support, what add you in the ostracism. You only have fun disturbing all the insects that can, in particular to a giant nest in your garden. What he doesn't know is that ants are preparing to fight so giant aggressor.Well, I must say that I liked, as almost all the animation. The script is quite childish, very dotted with moral respect details to others, even though they are smaller, and that the Union is strength. At the level of technical, because as always, amazing. The plot follows too well, and there are no shocks or scares. Everything follows the channels must continue. What happens is that it is too similar to many others, especially AntZ and even affection I have shrunk to children, what does lose a lot.In short, entertainment for the kids of the House, which can be seen by adults. Although if they learn the values that show us, the world would it spin better. |
3,070 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4300 | Jaime Martínez | Escuela de pringaos | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Typical American clichés in a comedy that adds nothing new to the genre, resulting in insusa and more predictable. Now that you can flee. | The truth is I expected much more of Todd Phillips in his return to the crazy American comedy after the undervalued Road Trip, but school of pringá you is not more than bullshit in the form of film. It will pass through the ticket without penalty or glory (except for your target audience) and will go directly to the shelves of our video shops where you will probably enjoy greater success in the form of something that rent a Saturday afternoon. Only with the title - as always another bad translation - we can predict us awaits us. Certainly, you are not looking for a masterpiece in this type of film, but a minimum of entertainment and ingenious gags that will help you to disconnect during 90 minutes. And that is what lacks this feature. With a more topical humor, the film unfolds over a silly script without any spark or comical. Only the interpretation of Billy Bob Thornton - Dr.House-voice and a cameo Ben Stiller is most noticeable of this truño devoid of grace. The main character is overflowing with stupidity and indifference in equal parts, without any funny scene; which if achieved in only a couple of times some side. Typical American clichés in a comedy that adds nothing new to the genre, resulting in insusa and more predictable. Now that you can flee. |
3,071 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4275 | Emilio Martín Luna | Los Crímenes de Oxford | 2 | 5 | muchocine | It is entertaining, you do not get bored, it lasts little, but is a feeling of disappointment when sales of cinema, as if what you have been counting is irrelevant, you forget it that same night. | Murders, this is the title of the novel on which this film is based. With this title, this director and a good deal, it is conceivable that, the less we will see a good movie. If in my previous criticism spoke of the label of the Coens, Alex de la Iglesia has been characterized by give a style to his films, something Dantesque, ironic and with black humor. In this, his latest creation the crimes of Oxford, we find a Director who renounces his style and makes us a more formal film, trying to catch the touch of intrigue by Hitchcock and British mystery film. Although some characters are cartoony, it is a different Church, and this is the first big failure of his film. I say first, because it has many more, the second and very serious is the casting, Elijah Wood, Mr Frodo for friends, has the same charisma that Jesulín in Cannes, deadpan, little credible happens throughout the film with face of surprised (enormous eyes, seems to receive a sartenazo in the face), open a door I surprised, lame bus me amazed, open unyogourth. that scare!I think good actor, for more details see Everything is Illuminated Liv Schreiber, but this film does not provide you the type, and is not the most appropriate physical. In fact, when faced with their female partners, Leonor Watling and Julie Cox have the same chemistry that Mel Gibson and the Pantoja. Leonor is an actress as the top of a pine but its mission in this movie is tontorrón to Elijah, vase we are going, the script treated very badly, and his character is irrelevant. More importantly is Julie Cox but his character is very bad explained by a script that omits much information away from the day the morning Mr Frodo has two females mad for him, and by that he is worth. On the other hand, if a hit is William Hurt, who is having a bad age (although of young not.)but it is a sensational player that gives credibility, and if you see dressed as Guy Fawkes (makes you smile.)(V for Vendetta).The script is quick, nothing explaining, while all the mathematical thinking with reference to Kessler and other authors, it is interesting, can be confusing, and after seeing the end, you think that it could be much better film, perhaps treat the film as logical succession is a good approach, but I think that it gives you many laps things to confuse you and then the result of the equation does not fit you. This sort of thing only is given either to Christopher Nolan, any director malhucho could have done something similar to this film, and Alex de la Iglesia is a great director, for I think that is you should demand more to this film.Despite everything, it is entertaining, you do not get bored, lasts little, but is a feeling of disappointment when sales of cinema, as if what you have been counting is irrelevant, you forget it that same night. Maybe that expectations were high but seeing the director and the title of the novel, the following figure of the logical series would be good movie, and trístemente is not the case. |
3,072 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2440 | Bruji | Un engaño de lujo | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Tunisian Pierre Salvadori amounts to class warfare the ironic fight of sexes popularized Ernst Lubitsch, achieving an accurate ridicule of el universo masculino, inheritance of Hawks. | Tunisian Pierre Salvadori amounts to class warfare the ironic fight of sexes popularized Ernst Lubitsch, achieving an accurate ridicule of el universo masculino, inheritance of Hawks. Powerful reasons which require repair in this fresh comedy French, evocative of mythic American cinema titles, and driven by a couple protagonist of exception.The difference between a tribute and a plagiarism is, fundamentally, managers who practice the first, responsible, explicitly recreate situations reminiscent of the past. They are these films winks that are much appreciated. The plagiarist, for their part, are engaged in mask ancient scripts following the vanguard Word. There is no doubt that Salvadori, - who, on numerous occasions stated his admiration by master Lubitsch, coming to be regarded as the devil said No as "a perfect film"-, belongs to the Honorable category. His latest work, a delicious comedy with classical dyes, is a good proof of this.Prix hors (something like Carísimo!) is one of those movies that get the attention of the Viewer from the opening credits. The rotating sombrillita belongs to a technique that would be mainly used in American comedies of the 1960s. A claim, however, that was not exclusive to this genre, only have to remember the prodigious home created Saul Bass for Anatomy of a murder (Otto Preminger, 1,959).The romantic comedy formula (paragraph that, improperly, parking is this tape) begins and ends with the chance encounter that occurs between the protagonists. A succeeded in Manhattan in which Cinderella (Gad Elmaleh) soon becomes pumpkin. A new "muñequita of luxury", Pretty modern Woman, that persecutes its Richard Gere.A from this time, the story starts an upward trajectory, looking for the classics, manages to satisfy the movie fan memory. From breakfast at Tiffany's (Blake Edwards, 1,961), with the implicit note of cruelty which contained the story of Truman Capote, until the freshness that only reaches the impossible dreams that we met on holiday in Rome (William Wyler, 1953). We follow a well marked out path in each bend, makes us to marvel. From how to marry A Millionaire (Jean Negulesco, 1,953) until the peculiar "petit déjeuner" served on the Gallic coast, the tribute paid to the beautiful sites of Nice, which both reminds that Delmer Daves made the eternal city in more beyond the Amor.De Fund, the famous battle of sexes it proliferate in the comedies of the 1930s and 1940selevated to class warfare; and the tendency to ridicule the male universe, legacy of Howard Hawks, which reached its maximum expression with the girlfriend Era of 1949. However, the final set far, a lot of what we know by a "film round". It yearns for an effective soundtrack, Councillor of the highlights of the plot; a point of depth in the dialogues, the existence of sharp and witty phrases that feed the script of Benoît Graffin; the creation of new situations that not eternicen initials; and, why not? the inclusion of some memorable frame that had known to exploit the beauty of the lead actress. The scene in testers of clothes, with a close up of the back of a sophisticated black evening gown, clear tribute to Audrey Hepburn, is a good attempt that fails to complete.In any case, with a couple star of luxury, a coherent plot, and development with its frequent references to mythical titles of the seventh art, Prix Hors is, without a doubt, one of the best comedies of the year. |
3,073 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/36 | Iñigo | Lutero | 2 | 5 | muchocine | From the deeper indifference to the most unwavering sopor | "It seems that, for some time here, the narrate the life of a historic and important character to fill the lack of ideas is turning in a free resource too overused and not always convincing results.""Luther", the film that concerns us, is one of the most clear examples of this. It's a work possessing an impeccable technical invoice, but not beyond the purely technical fanfare and a couple of ideas without deepening, as it is happening lately with this kind of (super) nature of biopic productions.The film ends up being very irregular, and manages to lose their limited interest even the most renegade followers of Catholic belief. It could be argued that all of their footage is only interesting from the moment that seeks to expose the fraud and bribery of the Church, a fraud that takes advantage of the misfortunes, shortcomings, convictions and illusions of the people with the unique and pure profit.But, how could it be otherwise, as described here as we have seen it hundreds of times in film and literature. Without going any further, films such as "Stigmata" already looked the quote of: "The Kingdom of God is within you, not in the constructions of wood and stone." Part a trunk of wood and I am there, lifts a stone and I will find. "."Eric Till, father of this creature, is that our particular Lutero will not be reflected as a mere rebel, but barely, ends up succumbing. Its intention to place it as a standard-bearer martyr does not stop convince nor move. Only we immerse ourselves in the idea that the character is not more than another victim for the inevitable. A victim of the fallacy that surrounds us in trying to expose the Church, a task, at times, close to utopian after centuries of power. And, why not say it, with possible so unnecessary as destructive consequences for humanity.For this reason, Luther, in certain scenes, could strain as a misunderstood classic, by both fans and detractors. Thus, as yet another occasion, our inexorable fate leads to the error. And the consequences. And the blame. But also to the obtaining of new directions.Unfortunately, as I said at the beginning of my criticism, the film not tells us nothing we don't already know. And is his main error: that shortage in the section of the originality, so patent today in products of this spirit. And the cast does not help to meet its many shortcomings. It is little more than correct in its entirety, with a Fiennes who plays no more than his intense gaze. Not even the great Bruno Ganz (which represents sanity supported Luther) stands out above the average.In short, a work that has interesting although I points very sobados, and half is in almost everything. Fails to deepen enough character nor historical accuracy that she herself begins. And, as a result, ends up producing the most absolute of the indifference.And many viewers to the most unwavering sopor. |
3,074 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3950 | Rafa Ferrer | Expiación: Más Alla de la Pasión | 4 | 5 | muchocine | The tape is not perfect, but certainly we have one of the great films of 2008. | True to the title and also expiando my sins in which in the movie buff refers (if it is that you can call you Sin end the year with "Saw 4" and start with "The Golden Compass") decided to do penance and at the same time redeem me with this movie, nominated for 7 Golden Globe (whose ceremony as well know not held by the already endless writers strike) and one of the more than likely candidate for the Oscars This year, it is that closer release a movie to the key month of February more options, and now is when we come cinema, in capital letters, leaving the "trash" commercial (and palomitera) for the rest of the year.As well, after my usual intro, which not always means something, but it tends to stay quite well, and that, for those who read me regularly, is almost part of the "seal of the House", go with my opinion on the film, an excellent drama romantic (and war) that will delight both of females attending cinemaas the "machorros" who believe that, once again, as a pig to slaughter, we're going to swallow the umpteenth romantic film of the year, we will find one of those movies that excite themselves and strangers.Perhaps, the only 2 notes negative that I see are, their exaggerated slowness and, it takes enough to enter in the field, is lost sometimes at levels irrelevant (seems to be a kind of rule not written by which all nominated films have to last at least 2 hours or more.), and convoluted to their fitting, do not know if it is he got me disoriented, or again I went to the cinema without glasses, or that I know myself, but somewhere that another occasion I had to ask my companions for that part of the plot were going.And now go with the good parties, on the one hand excellent performances by everyone from Keira Knightley to James McAvoy, through course Saoirse Ronan above all, who knows, with her huge blue eyes, and with his "evil child" fitted the most petty children's characters of the 7th art. On the other hand the great detail with which are careful sets, costumes, music (the score at some moments with the typewriter of Briony, as sound background.), as well as a picture of those that leave one with his eyes open wide during the slide.The tape is not perfect for these 2 mistakes which I have already outlined, but since then, we have a great movie, and given little film that I've seen what you have spent 2008 (only 2 films) will say that since then, if everything that I see now it equals the tape directed by Joe Wright, it will be for me this year one of the best years (in terms of quality) of cinema that visione. |
3,075 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1449 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | Syriana | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Infumable intensive workshop of international geopolitics made with undeniable and talented cinematographic forms, but burdened by excessive handling of situations, characters and sub-plots which eventually come crashing what could have been a colorful building. | Syriana is a meritorious puzzle whose Assembly governed the destinies of the world or, put another way, Syriana is a practical compendium of end geopolitics, a smart look to the powers in the shadow. Dante is no longer, nor is this love that he put as the engine of the world. "The love that moves the Sun and the stars". Or how to read the already infamous ido Hilario Camacho who sang that the weight of the world is love. Where before Dante or Camacho, each with his ways, and according to the time which played them live and die, is now an Arab Prince, perhaps instructed in Cambridge, sybaritic sins Westerners, although fierce bastion of his popular idiosyncrasy. And the weight of the world (now) is the oil and its accelerated mob of amazed that some reserved of luxury in a hotel of many stars govern our destinies and organized the placement of the tiles on the Board.Syriana is also a spectacular paper on the complex structures of the financial discourse of the world, but is not an excellent film. Nor is it good. Passes an enforced mediocrity, a territory in the limbo between the wild documentalism of Michael Moore in vein or plausible fiction of John Le Carré... Her McLean slight indications that whole plot is caught by excessive clamps. Drag insurmountable obstacles. The choreography of the international bureaucracy displayed law firms of a surprising shrewdness, conspiracies within the offices of the State, financial analysts with formidable influences, Arab Princes with magic lamps under the shoes of thousand dollars and Taliban terror, terrorists always, ignorant and jubilant votive offerings of their cause, which tends to always coincide with our nightmares.This mortar qualified important people builds a Community House and under that roof is the reader is who writes this. There we love and cry, smile and sing. The problem is that the intelligence of Stephen Gaghan, director and screenwriter of this interesting (although I have already said that failed) film obliges the spectator idle, not versed in all chromatic keys policy and their basements, a continuous (and tired) exercise of complicity and the plot, twisting, generous scenarios and ideas, disables all too often our attention spanwhich is surpassed by a torrential flood and sophisticated small frame that, assembled later, they seek a great plot or La Gran plot, the puzzle visionary, apocalyptic, the shadows of the world map.Syriana needed a booklet to explain the spaces blank in our brain. Also needs a large dose of patience: the necessary to circumvent these gaps, the apparently deslavazados pieces, the whole fabric of this global paranoia. To overcome these inconveniences, the film flows with another pace, which Gaghan gives: giddy, agilísimo, contaminated the adrenaline of these times of religious fundamentalism, moral relativism (as much to the Holy Father in Rome) and stock market fever.Barnes, George Clooney convicente, who was more than twenty pounds in a month and was left to grow a harrowing beard, leaves his witty gesture common to be the CIA agent sent to the Near East to assassinate an heir of an oil emirate that is being suspiciously advised, eyes yankees by an ambitious financial analyst (Matt Damon). "The greater the US addiction is foreign oil cheap," says Gaghan, author also of a script very loosely based on the book of memoirs of an American agent in the Middle, Robert Baer.El influence peddling in these high areas that we do not know can not imagine that Jean Claude Van Damme gives to arguments like: everything should be so thick, of a thicket dense and organic. And is this density which lastra to the film where it should: the dubious dream of science political fiction films, genre not abundant titles, but with his Legion of faithful that come on screen its thoughts on the issues here irrelevant or treated, are not few, little is it refine the ear and we pay all the attention we know to what has been said in these two hours and little dirt and black gold.The characters are accidental parts of the argument: there is a dedication in creating them close but rather the opposite: there is no empathy, are mercenaries, definitively irrecoverable people we seem to live in the society of everyday. It is acceptable praise its ideological distancing: its asepsis, his indifference almost. What it shows, and that only at the middle end we understand, it does not require a linking of the Narrator. The event are "bigger than life" as they say American critics of the show business. As this chronicler of the film currently lacking still two or three hervores history and four or five tablespoons of geopolitics international to catch all the subtleties of the script which, frankly, overwhelms, intimidates, leaves the Viewer (as he writes in particular) out of wave, selfless by any deep and relevant thinking that can querér us strain. And I have no doubt that they exist. And large. I do not get to both.Or I'll make no intensive workshop to see brief or leave it for when my mind is less troubled by the lack of free time. That of all there is.Addenda: Curiosities / Frases1.-Syriana is the name to refer to a hypothetical new scenario in East Medio.2.-George Clooney: "There is no intention in the film portraying Muslims as bad". Not as good tampoco.3-Matt Damon: "No one can say that it is proárabe or antiárabe". Not anti-American. (The movie) speaks for itself. "It does not give an answer." Nor does the right questions or for many and we were asphyxiated by both sign question mark. 4.-Stephen Gaghan: "To make the film, spoke with spies, smugglers of weapons, oil, political, intermediaries, members of terrorist, real houses." An agent of the CIA helped me, wanted to that I will understand, that it catch well. "It was a professional liar, but I believe that it has helped me to capture the essence". As he talked with a single character and turned out to be, at the time, spy, tanker, politician, dealer, Member of a Royal House...5.-Syriana was filmed in five languages and four contienentes.6-cast is numnerosísimo: more than one hundred characters of which nearly seventy have dialogue. 7.-Clooney, Heartthrob Hollywood here gray and efficient as an agent of the CIA mercenary, consented to the fattening and the wild population of the beard, but not shave, as I wanted to Gaghan, his head. There are no requirements of the script which can with some divos self-esteem. |
3,076 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1803 | Antoni Messa | Concursante | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Her won't escape. His wit, his broad sense of the absurd, his narrative nerve, his original commissioning scene and its critical spirit, do contestant? apart from a Supreme divertimento - the best movie buff dish served in recent months. Almost, almost, compulsory viewing. | Martin circus Martin is a Professor of history of the economy which, incidentally and in a quiz show, has won a whopping € 3 million in the form of lavish gifts. Several cars, a yacht, a plane, a giant mansion. Overnight, it has become a billionaire envied by the rest of the planet but, however, it has a serious economic problem: does not have almost cash with which cope with the immense debt just contracting with Treasury. Overwhelmed by such imposition, decide use banking to request a credit of 100 thousand euros. Without being there, just put in the mouth of the Wolf.This is, in short, the basis on which sustains one of the best films of the current scene, contestant, a splendid title in all senses. Rodrigo Cortes, director and screenwriter, with his first feature film and after several experiences in the world of the film proves to be in possession of a sense of humor certainly enviable. His work is cynical, full, hurtful and, above all, fun. Hilarious and combative. From Fincher in the Club of the fight, no one had dared to dynamiting to so accurately as Cortés. its bank rate is fully accelerated. There are almost no breaks. And where they exist, are totally understandable. Flash back and voice resources used in off in an exemplary manner, without distorting or damage the story which he proposes. Contestant progresses and regresses in time, so clear and nothing messy. To the contrary, their comings and goings with the camera are the true body of the film and thereby, and the collaboration of an unsurpassed Leonardo Sbaraglia, manages to transfer to the viewer the State of distress and abatement that is suffering the overwhelmed Martin circus Martin. And is that Sbaraglia, on this occasion - aside from increasingly resemble Luis Figo-, has found the role (in capital letters) of his life, that of a character with which it is easy to identify. As well the film critic Alex Gorina, after leaving the press pass, commented "this is a title that engancharía a lot of people, that few are those who can not be reflected on screen: who more, who certainly had to resort once in their life to the Bank to apply for a loan or a mortgage".The idea of contestant may seem far-fetched, but it is not at all. It may be exaggerated, swollen, but the things that plasma are as is, although to the beast, magnified, so that anyone you escape the strong garrotazo of the Rodrigo Cortes to the world of the economy. Taxes, bank interest and the free market, jobs in the pillory for an intelligent and Kafkaesque, executioner Professor Edmund (who gives life the always effective Chete Lera), an economist, with a lot of terrorist, that offers an unforgettable class, practical and visual, about the universe of finance against. A master class, in the form of ingenious game of chess which, at the same time, serves as a tribute to the Monty Python to the very bergmaniana the seventh seal. What I say: wonderful.Her won't escape. His wit, his broad sense of the absurd, his narrative nerve, his original commissioning scene and its critical spirit, do contestant? apart from a Supreme divertimento - the best movie buff dish served in recent months. Almost, almost, compulsory viewing.Notice them: this film think pass list. And I marcaré his faults of assistance as a very serious sin. |
3,077 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4091 | Andrés Pons | Agresión en la casa del terror | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Known in Spain with the title of aggression in the House of terror this film was the first to record digital video in addition to also mean the first commissioning of a work for the direct to video. | Some films become cult by a particular fact or much less for the quality that can offer in this case is null. Known in Spain with the title of aggression in the House of terror this film was the first to record digital video in addition to also mean the first commissioning of a work for the direct to video.This precedent gives a minimum thread's popularity in the debut of director and actors that did not work in any other product. Typical narrative of owned houses where adolescents of little brain are massacred in a few special effects of nursery, virtually amateur performances, a very poor staging in a by-product can do some grace to this cluster of absurdities. More that anything has its value to collectors. |
3,078 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4281 | Francisco Bellón | Ahora o nunca | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Now or never is not more than a simplistic and vulgar sentimentaloide comedy whose sole attraction is seen doing the clown a histrionic and unleashed Jack Nicholson. | The first months of the year tend to be dominated by the premieres of all the favorite movies of face to the season of awards in United States, both which finally come to be candidates, as are on the way. But among all these releases is also customary that slip other types of films, Hollywood with big aspirations of blockbuster comedies.Now or never is a good example, a story that has the last days of life of two men who suffer from cancer, but that far from surrender, decide to spend the little time that is left of life big as a tragicomedy. Said sounds very hopeful, but clear, should be the fate of being or meet a millionaire to do it, if it is slightly unbalanced as the character of Jack Nicholson, much better. Finally, a story that could have been fun is wasted here by easy sentimentality by Rob Reiner, real specialist in the genre. The story takes horrors to boot, and is the first third seems taken from a melodrama cheap. In what appears the histrionic vein of the great Jack Nicholson film back, but more by the genius of Nicholson and their expressions than by the screenplay or the ability to Reiner. Another negative detail of the film is how bad that sequences are carried with chroma, which are too obvious and evident.Now or never is not more than a simplistic and vulgar sentimentaloide comedy whose sole attraction is seen doing the clown a histrionic and unleashed Jack Nicholson. And it is that there are few actors who alone are able to make fun a regrettable script. |
3,079 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3528 | Bruji | Encantada: La Historia de Giselle | 2 | 5 | muchocine | After an intereante approach, the writers appear as lost as the Princess of tale in the current New York. | After titles mythical as Mary Poppins (1964) or the witch freshman (1971), the Disney pursues relentless new history that will mark the children of another generation of moviegoers. So far, between pajaretes and ratoncicos, that of Giselle is lost between the simplicity of form and the chaotic complexity of the content. "A tale too long" for children. For adults, a sympathetic disappointment.In the words of a movie fan six years beautiful, "a witch who lives in a fairy tale, pushes a Princess, who also lives in the tale, by a well, and the Princess appears in reality." Who, because of age, have seen some movies, and not rarely, not discern so clearly the line that separates the reality of what is not within the screen; We remind you that, in the history of the cinema, never missed characters that, vagaries of the script, eventful vicissitudes of fate or unfortunately charms, erred in world. Some authentic deities of exuberant forms, left Olympus to, in the form of Ava Gardner (Venus was woman, 1948) or Rita Hayworth (the goddess of the dance, 1947), make dream to mortals. Others, naïve girls of flesh and blood, is simply lost on a path of yellow tiles, traveled by "Lions, Tigers, Panthers, my God!", he would take them home (the wizard of Oz, 1939). And even those who adapted to her new life, resisted to undertake the path of return, Kate and Leopold (James Malgold, 2001) or mannequin (Michael Gottlieb, 1987). In the case of Encantada, we must seek immediate references in the classic Disney Animation. In the poisoned Apple that offers snow white, the wicked witch in the shoe of glass and the pajaretes couturiers of Cinderella, and the conviction that "a lovely day, the Prince vendrá" had Aurora when it was still not sleeping. Course, to adapt the story to put in the 36 corner with the 48, the glass becomes a model of Manolo Blahnik, the fairy godmothers are replaced by Golden credit cards and the offer of princes soars. Even Giselle is highest, more stylized and redhead than any of its predecessors. A kind of Ariel who lost the infantilism with fins. The first part of the footage offers a history of the old style of Disney's animation. A short story that crowns the three acts that comprise an excellent mount and that, as it could not be otherwise, is resolved with too much precipitation. However, the end turns out to be just the beginning, and the fall of Giselle by the moat, which fails to impair the opportunities of the protagonist to achieve happiness, does manage to truncate all the possibilities of the film to emerge from the mediocrity. And we can say that, after an interesting, although little original approach, the writers are as lost as the Princess of tale in the current New York. In its second part, the Royal, the plot is based and is reduced by the creation of obvious situations comic, of whom unfolds in a Habitat that is not ("would someone kind enough to tell me the way to the Palace?"), conducted by a reckless character that insults the intelligence, and giving way to the incursion of animated beings who have lost the magic and displayed as static figures of paintings on the wall. Good intentions be tarnished with the clumsy and scarce musical numbers, or perhaps the overwhelming simplicity that hides a dangerous message: are foster evil the brides parents?. A question that is not cleared in the chaotic denouement, which, after two hours of unbearable product, in a who's coming, who stays?, makes a superhuman effort to ensure that all eat partridges,-matters little how-forever never. Of course, the film causes furor in USA. It is normal that those branded "smoke" the innocent Sesame Caponata correct the behaviour of a girl adopts rats as pets, make dresses with the curtains in the lounge and sings through the parks. Although, of course, a good thing emerges from all this as we listen to a fragment of the soundtrack of the Little Mermaid "I want to see something special, I want to see a beautiful dance.", enjoy the majestic costume, or find the security that nothing is as powerful as a kiss of true love. And it is that romantic love is only a fantasy. unless you fall in love you. Within the cast, the bland performance of the egocentric Prince and the formal correction without the Prince of the advocacy Fund, they are outweighed by the impressive staging of Susan Sarandon and the know-how of the delicious promised of Leo DiCaprio in catch me if you can (2002). She, Amy Adams, the Oscar-nominated by Junebug of Phil Morrison, stands out in a history of exhausted resources to become its unique appeal. And just when you start to scare the idea of insensitivity, be too major to allow that the Disney Magic crosses the hearts, a small "minimoy" suggests behind me that "this is a very long story". Perhaps that is the essence of the criticism that I was looking for. |
3,080 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4163 | Ethan | Tener y no tener | 5 | 5 | muchocine | A lesson in how learning to whistle never had so many sexual connotations. | "Does Anybody got a match?". Those were the first words that spoke to the big screen actress who we remember today: Lauren Bacall. The star was born in New York, a month of September of more than eighty years ago and still continues to work at a good pace. The phrase in question belongs to the tape of Howard Hawks "Have and have not", and the appearance in a door frame of the young Bacall asking for matches that would be her future husband in real life is already legendary: Humphrey Bogart. "To have and to have not" born a curious bet between Ernest Hemingway - always reluctant to take part in a film project - and Howard Hawks. The director, to involve the novel Prize to participate in a film, threw a challenge. He said that he was able to make a successful film based on the worst of his novels. And Hemingway stung the hook. A few days Hawks managed to buy the rights to the book to his friend and got underway for what would be one of their best treadmills and, by extension, one of the largest ever made. With "To have and have not" they wanted to take advantage of the pull of "Casablanca". Thus, the character of Bogart was again a selfish who did not want to get involved in any war and resisted the charms of Slim (translated here by "Flaca", the nickname of Lauren Bacall in the film, the same that used Hawks to call his second wife); the bar, where much of the action was much reminded the film of Curtiz Rick coffee; but also the exotic environment of Martinique and the intrigues by the French resistance were suspiciously similar to those of Casablanca. Much of the blame that the final result had very little to do with the original, was a woman of. 19 years! -This was the age of Bacall when he withdrew the casting-. It is true that the director caused the situation because I was looking for a new Marlene Dietrich competed in coolness with his male opponent. So I needed the appropriate writers to make sprout witty and sharp phrases from his lips. Had: William Faulkner (another novel Award) and Jules Furthman - the latter had previously worked with Von Sternberg in a film of Marlene Dietrich ("Morocco"). But with what Hawks did was with the crush that arose the first month of shooting between the two protagonists. After the surprise, the director wanted to take advantage of the situation and ordered to rewrite the script. The result was spectacular: the sensual call of matches by Lauren Bacall was actually an invitation if Harry Morgan (Humphrey Bogart) to descend into his arms; or a bottle that ranged from a room to another was the perfect excuse for romantic encounters between the couple. The truth is that nobody has been able to match this complicity. One serving them to plan a robbery at a bar, only with the look; or to "play" the love in your room, where a lesson of how learning to whistle never had so many sexual connotations. Despite all of the above "Have and have not" is a film hawksiana on all four sides. His favorite subject, of friendship, was more than present. Thus, the cause of the final implication of the hero is the relationship between Bogart and his protégé, Eddie - great Walter Brennan - drunk and not the sex with Lauren Bacall. Only when his friend suffers an attack is when Morgan decides to act, but curiously does so in every sense: in the war, helping the resistance; and staff engaging with "la Flaca". This film directed by Howard Hawks was a real turning point in his career, but was also the discovery of a great actress. If there is a scene that I always associate with this masterpiece is a tall, thin woman resting on the proportion of a door. It takes a suit paintings, with shoulder pads. It has a slightly tilted head, with high eyebrows and insinuating look; and, with a deep voice, says: "does Anybody got a match?". |
3,081 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3309 | Silvia Giner | Stardust | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Stardust is a tale of fairies, stars, princesses and a happy Kingdom that will delight all ages and also is always a pleasure to see Robert de Niro, a man that takes advantage of everything he does with the spectacular Pfeiffer. | Spectacular film ideal for accompanied children (who had been in the room when I was in the cinema is thrilled and applauded all the time). The original proposal of this old English story takes form of the hand of Matthew Vaughn to which you are not known other titles of relevance. Fast-paced, fun with an inexhaustible rhythm and a few actors that are wonderful in their interpretations.Stardust is a tale of princesses, fairies, stars and a happy Kingdom that will delight all ages and also always is a pleasure to see Rober de Niro, a man that draws party everything you do together to the always spectacular Michelle Pfeiffer.Si you want to spend a fun time do not hesitate to go to see her and quedaréis steeped in all its magic, great photography, ideal design costume and not a great movie.But as not everything is perfect, the role of "Star" do not see for Claire Daniels, which I think has a rough beauty and a montesa nose. I would have preferred a Chirsten Dunst. Claire always her are great and what it is, is a wonderful chacha of those that leave you in the mailbox your phone number that you call them to clean your home for hours, but so is the film. |
3,082 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2686 | José A. Peig | Re-Animator | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Synthesis and simplicity; It is a film with two faces or dimensions of meaning. The deep horror, and the fun and frantic satire. | The so-called "splatter" film inspired by stories that referred to the macabre aspects of human existence, such as blood, viscera, and meat subject to all kinds of violence resulting from the harassment of the human body in its material dimension, which can cause a whirlwind of images that affect the sensations, specifically disgust, exploiting a theme so universal as the fear of death, but from its purely morbid manifestations. Consequently, we can say that the "gore" creates the most primary feeling of horror of all, almost primordial suffering; the prehistoric humán which sees his flesh torn apart by the paw of the beast or contemplates terrified how the jaws of the beast decapitan the body of one of their peers. Stuart Gordon directed this masterful exercise in splatter film based on the intention of talking about fear of death and the desire to overcome, this immutable skull of terror, in this case, expressing itself through a sharp look that it agglutinates shades with skill as satire, cynicism, irony, macabre humor and sadomasochistic sensuality.Despite moving on a ground "underground", the filmmaker and his writers have shown due concern for telling a story, without falling into the trap - as usual in this type of film - subordinate the significance of the tape to a mere and uncontrolled show of hemoglobin and viscera. No. In the Stuart Gordon film the top and bottom overlap to articulate the discourse around a basic storyline depicted in the character which we see in the early sequences tries to revive the body of a dead, followed by the subsequent malaise by the sense of helplessness induced before the echo live with death. In the final sequence, that same character returns to deal with death, new failure, this time reinforced by the loss of his beloved fémina, which motivates the macabre last action, the well-deserved climax to the suggestive orgy of the Dantesque. I think that it has already said, it is worthwhile to repeat it; in the cinematic language, the image - or images - which opens the story and the image that closes play a fundamental role. Re-Animator is pure and perfect structuring and articulation of the story, without beating with unnecessary detours; simplicity and precision.The other great handicap we see embodied in the figure of the scientist crazy, characterized by way of a Dr. Frankenstein coarse and cynical, which has an excellent counterpart in its competitor of Brasil profile and repulsive cartoon expression, and who see holding his own head in some of the passages most delusional of the film (in truth, in this film)(Science and scientists are represented with an eloquent satirical sense and good dose of bad grapes). Miracle whey is which provides the metamorphosis and the step that goes from humanity aware, or already dead, to the of the pure automaton, the gestural mimicry that characterizes the figure of the zombie and induces a feeling of horror nestled in the primordial fear that used to do reference to the beginning of the text: the disgust arising from these automated movements, these gestures of sheer insanity without conscience, the no-muerte but neither is life. To be more concise: the human being in a land unknown, devoid of soul, slave of the chaotic reflections movements of the nervous system, where no longer makes sense.That feature of the zombie is which removes some very deep fears, and the film we are discussing today explodes with wit and overwhelming sense of the grotesque zombie feature that just described, and supported with disturbing elements of great relevance in what psychological impact refers, thus flow sensations of horror while they walk on macabre comedy tonesthrough an intelligent use of dynamic narrative and all the springs that fall within the own cómico-siniestro story possibilities. Synthesis and simplicity; It is a film with two faces or dimensions of meaning. The deep horror, and the fun and frantic satire.Overall, an undisputed masterpiece, perfect example that the kistch and the "underground" are not exempt from being matter from which cinematically represent ideas or stories freighted with wit and a penetrating and provocative look about the same universe kistch in which they move. Robert Rodriguez is well would learn the lesson, if you consider an artist. This is art. His film is remake. |
3,083 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2918 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | Wolf Creek | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Healthy renewal of the genre of teen horror with psychopath. | There are disturbed behaviors that matrimonian well with true cinema commercial temperament, film that favors the theatrical to the austere or sensible approach. Wolf creek is the archetypal investment of this rule and leads its plot between the postal to the National Geographic, the Dogma of Lars Von Trier and, of course, its syncopated final, the pure slasher, that body count of adolescent resonances here allowing contaminated by a renewed perspective. The directorial debut of Australian Greg McLean dismantles the schematic pattern of similar budget films tromba and poses a more than decent study of characters and a verisimilitude that surprises, unexpected, when it expects a view uneasy poster, is a massacre, one of those modern entertainments that exploit the morbid and erected the truculence as most striking claim.The script of the own McLean offers nothing new: everything is already more than seen. This is what we have written many times, but what is surprising and what rings this film special is the ability of its author to maintain some kind of balance that only is altered with the predictable, necessary and attractive side final, rigorous and heir to all the heritage aesthetic lighting by Boorman, Hopper or Craven, founding masters of the genre.The Australian landscape incorporates a progressively hostile props, influencing many of the sensations caused by the development of the plot, but not to the way in which Aja uses in the hills have eyes. Here the naturalism has an interested delinquency, an accomplice of the leisurely tour of the script. McLean obvious the offal and mounts a worthy, new product in that it is impossible to be entirely, but higher than the infamous flood of juvenile horror films, reventonas of meat, mostly always satisfactory numbers of "hot" scenes where the psycho turn desmembra personnel and stored in a basement the viscera as hunting trophies. |
3,084 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4207 | Oscar Martínez | Monstruoso | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Under its apparent novelty and its tremendous viral promotion, 'Monstruoso' continues to be entertaining but typical story of 'boy saves girl from the monster' filmed with a camera in hand hyperrealism something sickening. | This weekend comes to our screens the film whose viral promotion has been of the most spectacular in recent times. Directed by Matt Reeves and stars Michael Stahl-David, Mike Vogel, Jessica Lucas, Lizzy Caplan, OdetteYustman, T. j. Miller, Margot Farley and Theo Rossi, undoubtedly the most recognized name of this Monstruoso, aka Cloverfield, is its producer, j. j. Abrams, creator of cult series like lost or Alias.Monstruoso has a monster attack in New York City, in the heart of Manhattan, narrated from the point of view of a group of young people who the filamrán everything with his camera of video with the intention of preserving his testimony.As I said something above, Monstruoso can boast of being the film with one of the most aggressive internet campaigns ever: dozens of rumors, title changes, its enigmatic creature, videos of all kinds. And, as it was to be expected, similar campaign has emerged effect, because in a few weeks Monstruoso has rentabilizado loosely production cost only at the American box office.In a mix - argued by own producer - Godzilla and Blair Witch Project or if moved it just to the previous year, [·REC] and The host, monstrous is an entertaining tape mix of action and terror that plays so brazen with everlasting echo of the attacks of 9 / 11. You must only take a piece at random from the film produced by j. j. Abrams and any video posted on YouTube of some testimonial videoficionado during the attack on the twin towers to give account of this.Thus, Monstruoso uses the panic and confusion of the hasty camera and a few credible Visual effects and sound to tell, in a seemingly innovative way, the same old story. And is to make a monster film to plague New York City poses discover gunpowder, precisely, and as I have said on more than one occasion, the resource of the mockumentary begins to be too recurrent.As well, however, one must recognize that Monstruoso is a film ideal for eating popcorn, if one is not too prone to dizziness, and the action is pretty well worn, despite remind us to a host of films, from the aforementioned Godzilla, The hostname or [·REC], to Alien or Pitch Black at times.As usual in this type of production, the first third of the film is completely irrelevant, with a preview of his characters totally irrelevant to what the viewer has come to witness, followed by a supposed history of antiheros - or heroes of a foot, according to taste-, which in fact conceals a story of boy saves girl from the monster. As always, the monster of the day is not what one expected us much reminding of The host and, as is also often common, left over the last ten minutes of footage that does not reach the hour and a half. On the other hand, one of the great successes of the film is the fact of not showing the monster clearly, if not in a progressive way, following the pattern of Alien and Ridley Scott dictum of causes us more terror what we believe that we have seen, to know that we have seen.But, again, Monstruoso is a film entertaining, certainly tense moments and that will no doubt delight of good palomitero cinema fans. |
3,085 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2787 | Ramón Balcells | La Caja Kovak | 2 | 5 | muchocine | In the Kovak box the pace is in great danger, because even in the seemingly interesting end lacking in entertainment and it ends up being, nothing more and nothing less that a simple and blatant "homage" (copying, plagiarism...) to more classic thrillers. | The main mistake of the film by Daniel Monzón is feel good, or is believed good. Already in the beginning is this tremendous capacity to begin to count events (strange or fictional?)and then leave them in the air. And that is where the second and very serious problem arises: these events are not well explained or end up being resolved so coerente. And this, in a film of intrigue, it is essential to be well carried out. In the Kovak box the pace runs another serious danger, because even in the seemingly interesting end lacking such entertainment and it ends up being, nothing more and nothing less that a simple and blatant "homage" (copying, plagiarism.) to the more classic thrillers. Moreover, this bland outcome is contradicting to its apparent aspect too bombastic. So ridiculous little, final suspense and, of course, awful script. I would only highlight an able to entertain the Viewer without being shameful Timothy Hutton and with pretty good scenes such as the hospital or House of that partner. His companion, a soda and agonies Lucía Jiménez, fails to give the height in her first foray into English-speaking film. His performance is tired, but I think that this is due to the monsoon, which has directed painfully. It is one of those characters that end up getting tired to the Viewer. The rest of the cast stays in the line of Hutton, as they are not too annoying. They only complement. And it is that already media film you realize that this is a mixture of movies (badly mixed) and that not only he has no feet or head, but that it also lacks personality. And only have to see several of the sequences where initially has to witness that touch Monzón (sorry if it is too ridiculous), that, unfortunately, only is presence in a scene (if that is his personal touch): the terrace of the bar and the fall of the protagonist. And I say the way is shot, a plane sequence "false" remarkable quality. The rest, disappointing. A bad film capable of surprising us by disappointing that comes to be, more than anything because I at least, I was expecting something much better. And it is that I had never seen an ending so inconsistent and failed like this! I hope that the next time this such monsoon Daniel knows what makes and you roll the scenes with a bit of common sense and, above all, personality. |
3,086 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2463 | Bruji | Chuecatown | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Tape full of absurdities, that start with a bad script, crowned worst dialogues; they reach a novice director, that anything you serve close-ups; to lead to some interpretations lamentabilísimas. | Between the "Percebe Rue" and an episode of the last season of "Here no hay quien viva", the writers of this free (and bad) adaptation comic of Rafa, forget that the creation of characters almodovarianos can only birth of La Mancha grace that they are unaware. The director, meanwhile, forgotten address. The actors interpret. The Viewer, what is the cinema. How is that of the new law?, for each Spanish film that we impose, will have to see three American to not forget what is cinema?, will someone ensure the quality of tax products?, are they at the height of the Spanish public?, what criteria governed the granting of State subsidies?, what subsequent premieres?.Is true that a good film, seen by anyone, and that only very lovers are able to swallow us any crappy, and write about them; but, even so, should not fill the glass of water droplets. You can come a time in which also "very lovers" abandon the screening room, a fact that has not seen in theaters since my earliest childhood, one that I started with titles like New York under the terror of the Zombies. For different reasons, Chuecatown is the typical film of which is that of it seems impossible that "is ispirado" something to someone other than the desire to run.And yet the thing not painted wrong remote initially. Divertidamente absurd situations, with a touch of black humour, accompanied by timely and effective blows of laughter. Characters who are struggling out of the marble that surrounds them, and could have been attractive to the Viewer. The frutera with literary aspirations, the aggressive Executive to the "Spanish Psyco", or the Inspector of police that collects all the unimaginable phobias, were inside the perfect mold. An original and coherent argument away from the typical comedietas of bed and tits to which we are accustomed, it tends towards the curious and unusual thriller. A proposal that dared to make funny allusions to Hitchcock film, with the animosity of Marnie (the thief) to the color red and the change of name of Anthony Perkins (Bates by Foster) in psychosis, which also parodies the famous shower scene. A pattern, in short, that would become a film unobtrusive and entertaining, especially recommended for a double session of DVD.However, the drawn line is not know keep beyond the first fifteen minutes of footage, proceeding to the resolution of the plot with pantomimes derived from mythical titles of the best Spanish films. I mean, of course, the quotations the League magic (Antonio Ozores, 1980), intelligent political jokes of El Cid Cabreador (Angelino Fons, 1983), and as it could not be otherwise, to great performances by Christopher Columbus, discoverer ex officio. These two last, belonging to the historical genre, that lot and well cultivated our film. Titles, all with one common denominator that remains undaunted in the history of Flahn, which gives different characters, equal records.The end result, discover us a tape full of absurdities, that start with a bad script, crowned worst dialogues; they reach a novice director, that anything serve close-ups achieved through mirrors (typical in the Filmography of Don Pedro Almodóvar); to lead to some interpretations lamentabilísimas. The characteristic of a deal doomed to a very bad direction of actors, which only survives, and not in all cases, Pepón Nieto.Llegados at this point that the crappy begins to emerge in all their addresses, the only possible solution to prevent the disaster would have been the recourse to an effective and misleading advertising, passed by holder product "The mystery of the dark room"offering an erotic thriller with nudity of Pablo Puyol. American cinema would have done so. They don't have the healthy habit of lying, but bad. More, as not that would work us, came to the conclusion, fellow filmmakers, that the only effective remedy so the public does not jump from his armchair at the minute forty-eight and exclame something as Spanish as go movie shit!, is none other than the put to work. that it is high time. |
3,087 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/839 | Rafa Ferrer | Separados | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Surprisingly recommended, for all those we see in these movies, again and again, as always. | I must admit that I am a suffering from this kind of film, and that when yesterday, "my santa" suggested me to see this movie, I I revolví, almost in pain, before again 2 hours wasted in a script planned to the millimetre and which passes through all the possible States of this type of film, and yet my opinion cannot be more successful, that this tape, begins just where the others end up, come on, the next step to "and were happy and ate partridges." (and we gave us, with the dish in the noses), because well, here, those who stick (and that way) with the dish in the noses are a Jennifer Aniston in her role as always, and Vince Vaughn, in his role as always also. And is that the plot we all know; boy meets girl, blah blah blah, quickly entered during the opening credits (accompanied by a Queen song "do You? re best Friend") and along with photos showing brief pieces of their relationship, and in a moment, we get "the mess" (or plot), where both Aniston and Vaughn throw junk at the head, over and over againhonestly, I felt identified with the role of Vaughn in hundred of times, put that here, server, also often getting home and ignite as a soul that leads the devil, the XBOX, for killing Martians, getting goals, or triple, forget for a few minutes of his painful work routine.As I have already said, Jennifer and Vince are normal, accustomed to this kind of film, they move like fish in the water, and nothing of them emphasize, or outline, correct, certainly they cannot be more, however, that if they manage to take the cat to the water are secondary, in particular, already, director Jon Favreau film, face, never better said, Cole Hauser, and a nice Justin Long that begin to see regularly in the Vince Vaughn movies, here as Secretary, gay, Jennifer Aniston.Tal, the only note negative that I see in the film is that covered under the blessing of the "romantic comedy", fails never beside him more correct, and is that, when it is intended to be dramatic, it is funny, when pretends laugh too, sorry, and when he tries to be morally correct, ends up being mortally voracious, so, Peyton Reed (and I thought that this name was a pseudonym), turns to go again, as happened in "Down with love", the shot backfires.Surprisingly recommended for all those we see in these movies, again and again, as always; also useful for not believing that our House is the navel of the world, unfortunately, all (without exception) are equal. |
3,088 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/970 | Matías Cobo | Eragon | 1 | 5 | muchocine | The lackluster and predictable result is a direct result of the unbearable inertia of the Americans to conceive the film as a single industry. | Eragon is to cinema what McDonald's food. Fast food for easy digestion and poor nutritional value. I do not would save or as event Mall cinema popcorn maker/family. Because, in this case, the producers of this invention marketing have a face as long as left brain. They decide to do a hodgepodge copying the notable trilogy of Jackson, that time be located in a place privileged as epic entertainment film, and the dull and recent the Chronicles of Narnia. The lackluster and predictable result is a direct result of the unbearable inertia of the Americans to conceive the film as a single industry. Because, even if the tapes are precise to sustain the bloating business and thus produce smaller works but infinitely better, reniego of the overabundance of films of this type and of the advertising and commercial paraphernalia that bring with them. In the end, more films are being franchises for sale of video games, toys or derived from a roll of two hours and a half instantly forgettable t-shirts.The film, as I say, not worth or to be entertained while one eats the pipes. The story is decorated with the typical elements: elves, dragons and heroes face a dark evil that sojuzga them with the iron hand of all medieval warlord. The good must fight against evil, and a chosen, that now instead of an Elf a ring bearer is a madder chosen as the last copy of Dragon Rider, will be the hope of men. The young blond hair meets an egg and it was born a baby Dragon which, in a pair of flapping and raids by the field, becomes greater and is able to telepathically talk to the waiter. As it is "chosen", although all you antojen an esmirriado for so much horse, the forces of evil will go after him to kill him. But without hardly training, the night the day, the boy pilot to his dragon as Alonso a F-1 and begins to do spells without or Pope of the world of magic elvish language. And this cross between Aragorn and Gandalf, with the invaluable collaboration of a Court of Knights and Amazons willing to give his life for him, is the hero built with this scandalous lack the originality.But not enough to shoot a story so trite and bland, it was also filmed by copying? in vain? the style of others much better and plagiarizing sequences and levels of blatant way. Have we how many times have seen a group of riders dressed with long layers ride through the countryside while the camera from an aerial outlet gives a 360-degree turn at high speed? Many, right? As Eragon serves us another serving of more of the same. And why is it that the fanfare of Fund who officiates soundtrack sounds having heard, but in versions infinitely better (such as the Shore), other dozens of times? I do not know if even Mann is the involvement in such a project of actors of the talent of Jeremy Irons and John Malkovich. Vale who take out a few extra milloncejos almost without disheveled in the commercial cinema from time to time, but perhaps they should think a bit before putting their names in the credits of this nonsense. Because, honestly, his performance is in line with the poverty of the rest of the cast. And the film is not that I have disappointed, since he did not have high expectations, but yes it has bothered me, as it is clear in these lines, because it is a joke of volume and spine. I don't think I to again it take in the aftermath of the forthcoming Christmas. |
3,089 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2883 | Matías Cobo | La Jungla 4.0 | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Not surprisingly, almost nothing, but not bored with his chute of breakneck action. | The impact of the first film starring Bruce Willis as John McClane was such in Spain that the replacement of the original English title, Die Hard (hard kill) of the jungle, Crystal has kept in the later sequels. The terms 'jungle' or 'Crystal' had some lace that tape whose action was set in the Nakatomi skyscrapers, while their presence in the titles of the sequels is only due to a mere association with the successful tape of John McTiernan. In any case, the perpetuation of the Spanish title of the first film exemplifies the indelible mark left by one.Since its inception, McClane had many ingredients to make a hole between the most illustrious heroes of action cinema. His ill-fated gift of ubiquity, its rudez and strength to get rid of the villains or its 'sobrao' phrases and chop constitute you as an atypical Hero easily to empathize with the public. Satisfied succeeded the sequels, the leading role of McClane grew at the expense of the arguments of the films, clearly at the service of the reissue of the actions and traits typical of the New York police.In the jungle 4.0 does not change this drift. McClane is presented again as a good COP with a privacy shattered. Divorced and with a daughter declared in absentia, our protagonist does not seem to have much served his heroic service record. Nothing new on previous chapters. But the public already knows his veteran poli instinct tanning in a thousand battles take while to resurface. And does it so in the same way as in previous adventures, catching him suddenly the most inappropriate circumstances.Returns to deal with terrorists, political demands on the sidelines, only pursuing fill pockets hand full. This does not change with respect to previous deliveries. Logically, what Yes change methods of the villains are now facing McClaine. The Spanish title already tells us that envelope something computers and bytes will be this new proposal for action. But there is no better remedy that usual medicine of McClaine against the dominant 'hackers' in cyberspace: the call out left and right. The pistol of this hard poly hastened the sophistication of the terrorist Fronte on some computer screens with that, however, is able to sow greater disasters.Anyway, this fourth installment starring a tricky technique as Len Wiseman not surprised almost nothing, but not bored with his chute of breakneck action. It is the best and the worst that can be said of the fourth installment of this franchise of action led by Bruce Willis. |
3,090 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3190 | Andrés Pons | Jóvenes Muertos | 2 | 5 | muchocine | One of these films that despite their latent mediocrity have something special, that thug point or that such unhealthy atmosphere of 1980s. If it appreciates in dandruff fun without ask anything can be funny. | It could pass as one of many ochenteras stronger a came between the MAD DOCTORS of all life and the slasher seen on so many occasions.The first thing that surprises is seen in the script to a stranger then BILL CONDON, one of the great authors of the time with very prominent films "KINSEY, gods and monsters". In the early 1980s he earned his life working on scripts for series b, surprise in 1987 with his first feature film as a director in the anthology SISTER SISTER. Director MICHAEL LAUGHLIN just returned to get behind the camera in a continuation of this film a couple of years later.In the cast are two outstanding performers, the winner of the oscar for someone flew over the nest of the cuckoo "LOUISE FLETCHER" and veteran MICHAEL MURPHY seen in other low-budget horror films "the House of the cliff or YORGA the Vampire". Because these non-standard substance names in the genus could not get this rarity of mediocrity. Very bad shot, performed worse, technically lacks the slightest professionalism highlighting only by a Martian plot or the costume completely Psicotronico. One of these films that despite their latent mediocrity have something special, that thug point or that such unhealthy atmosphere of 1980s. If it appreciates in dandruff fun without ask anything can be funny. |
3,091 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1416 | Francisco Bellón | Diamante de sangre | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Blood diamond is one of many films that are worth a theoretical desire of awareness and denounces as a mere excuse to offer countless gunfights and action scenes. | In recent years the film seems to have returned a social conscience who had lost for quite some time, and fortunately increasingly more committed films or they carried the great forgotten made public or few acquaintances. And if there is a region of the Earth that humans have had historically remote and forgotten, and largely still, is the black continent, Africa. Everything which has affected Africa, from the brutalities committed during the European domain until the conflicts caused by the lack of foresight of the post-colonial cast, have stayed in second place to end up in oblivion.Edward Zwick rescues that forgotten civil war that shook Sierra Leone less than a decade ago, and does so through one of the protagonists of the conflict, illegal trafficking in diamonds. Danny Archer (Leonardo DiCaprio) is a mercenary and smuggler of diamonds who works for a large multinational. Solomon Vandy (Djimon Hounsou) is a peaceful fisherman forced to work in the mines of the rebels, where he finds and hides a large diamond. With the help of a journalist, Maddy Bowen (Jennifer Connelly), both begin a flight to recover the precious stone and thus escape from their respective hell. The film, a story designed to play the chord of the viewer and try to raise it starts with this approach, despite the redundancy, on the problems that as a pest plague Africa. However, blood diamond is one of many films that are worth a theoretical desire of awareness and complaint as merely an excuse to offer a host of shootings and scenes of action, to which more spectacular. Edward Zwick, whose skill in the director Chair happens unnoticed, passes on tiptoe by matters more spiny, without getting wet and without offering anything new to justify the payment of the entrance. The screenplay by Charles Leavitt makes water on all four sides, which is replete with situations that border on the absurd. What could not miss is the typical rigorous humano-lacrimógeno conflict, represented on this occasion by Djimon Hounsou's character and his son, whose climax is one of the most ridiculous scenes of the film. The characters are flat, and although they have a certain evolution over the course of the plot, this is very obvious and predictable. On its protagonists, little you can expect from Leonardo DiCaprio, whose interpretation despite not ceasing to be correct, is somewhat empty and distant. Djimon Hounsou does a good job, but without fanfare, while Jennifer Connelly, in addition to not disheveled whatever happens, don't know or hold the camera in a convincing way.Blood diamond is one of those movies that are worth a story that really deserves to be told to transform it into a scene of action after another. It is a pity that with the available means preferred to make the tape to the purest style of Hollywood leaving aside intended to deepen in a forgotten conflict. |
3,092 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2902 | Beatriz Perez | La hora fría | 2 | 5 | muchocine | I try to be benevolent and look for the positive aspects of ‘ the cold hour ’. However, find none, except in any case, the laudable intention of making film genre in Spain. | The only thing that has given me this film fear, that it opens Friday 14, is thinking that I will receive after my negative criticism, with the well that has been of Elio Quiroga in this blog. Why try to be benevolent and look for the positive aspects of ‘ the cold hour ’. However, find none, except in any case, the laudable intention of making film genre in Spain. A more suitable approach for a short film for a long shows how living a few people after a chemical warfare. The protagonist, Jesus, a boy of eight years, presents all his companions in exile while recording with a camera video moments of his confinement. The death of a chicken indicates that it will occur at night, a cold hour, which will have to lock in their rooms to which “ the invisible ” not attack them. When we almost half film arises the need to go to a store to pick up food and medicines. And there for the first time shows a threat: “ strangers ”. It's beings that function as a chemical weapon because they are infected and can infect someone healthy with just touch it. Much later, outsiders will have to be removed because the protagonists discover that they are approaching too the place they inhabit.It seems he had summarized the argument with bad idea, making it sounds ridiculous to purpose. But it is not. During the greater part of the footage nothing happens. It is not that we find ourselves in a conflict derived from the own situation of forced survival, that might be good, but there is no conflict. Because strangers can attack them only if refugees violate certain rules and to hide from the invisible is so easy, there is nothing to fear until the final moment. And everything we see are sequences about the everyday life of these survivors. The time could be detained and could even build a film without twists in which envolviese us an atmosphere of panic or distress of an imminent end of the world. However, it is not the case and none of the scenes gives the slightest fear. It would and could alter the order in which the sequences are mounted the same, which means that nothing that takes us to the next and that everything happens there is because Yes, as for example, sudden changes in the psychology of the characters.Everything is attached with thread in ‘ the cold hour ’. One thing is not to justify the sources of fear, that already today it is accepted in many films, especially if they are Asian. Quite another to include numerous dialogues in which explain these origins, but pass through them are treated as stepping on eggs to not risk to mess up if something deepens. In addition, the tricks for dosage information-not tell everything to the viewer of coup, but little by little, are too brazen. A very shallow approach, at the same time, it is believed deep and as a sign of pretentiousness, biblical names puts them to the characters: Peter, Paul, Lucas, Maria Magdalena, Jesus, Judas, Saulo, etc … along with the weak script, the worst aspects of the film are interpretations. Not be go naming one by one to the actors and actresses who do bad, removing children and adolescents, are very evenly matched, at which one worse than another. Silke, Pablo Scola, July Perillán, Pepo Oliva, Omar Muñoz, Jorge Casalduero, Nadia de Santiago, Marco González, Carola Manzanares … are some of their names.The aesthetics are perhaps the most visible of all. It is likely that readers, if they are very fond of terror, appreciate something the film, due to the lights and shadows of his photography. But Quiroga not only fails the script and the direction of actors. As a filmmaker nor cannot ignore you some things. The few action scenes that are shot with a surprising lack of pace and verve. The author is more attentive to transitions that look that narrate, inter alia because there is nothing to tell. With the steady-cam try to give packaging that has no, but these movements of the camera, in addition to being clumsy, don't fit fluently with formal decisions generic, closer to the own of the shorts that aspect of any feature.It is true that the budget of the film may have been low, but is not obstacle for best results in facets, such as the script and acting work, which I have mentioned. Other technical aspects are poor. Although the film is Spanish and has shot with live sound, there's always fragments that it is necessary to bend because the voices were not taken with the right conditions. However, bent parts are out of sync. There are Z series films which are very bad and that is precisely why you can enjoy for a laugh. Occasionally I've confessed that I have seen more than one of Uwe Boll with that intention. But ‘ the cold hour ’ — on that link you can see trailers and more information — not even brings these minutes of morbid joy. It becomes long despite not being and bore up to the pointer. If it were something better, would talk about what little original which is his starting point, for the amount of similar films — as ‘ the thing ’ Carpenter — that exist. But hopefully this would be the only bad thing the second film by Elio Quiroga after ‘ photos ’. |
3,093 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4312 | Christian Sandoval | Tras el cristal | 4 | 5 | muchocine | "A disturbing film, showing the unhealthy relationship between victim and perpetrator, that it will be quite difficult to forget once it is seen" | "Behind the glass" (1987) is the first feature film of the Spanish director Agustí Villalonga, which was facing a series of problems that delayed its release date. I first present serious problems due to the lack of money to make the film. They were only $300,000 for its realization, which is relatively little if we are talking about a quality production. Once released the film, I am presenting a series of problems of censorship. The truth is that this film is a blow to the senses, it presents a raw and disturbing, plot by what refers to the stir this production reached in his time.Klaus (Gunter Meisner) is a nazi officer who worked in horrible experiments for children. After torturing and killing a child, he attempts suicide, falling prostrate and depending on an iron lung.When Griselda (Marisa Paredes), the wife of Klaus decides to find someone to look after her husband, introduces a young man name Angelo (David Sust) who claims to be a nurse, which offers to take care of Klaus. Despite the mistrust that he produces the younger to Griselda, this it ends up hiring. From this point, began to develop an unhealthy relationship between these two characters, to the point where the young woman offers to be he who run new experiments.The director was inspired by various themes that ended up coming together in this heartbreaking film. First he thought how serious live life through a person, due to the impossibility of moving from one place, which also implies a great degree of confinement. This added to a story he saw about a man dressed as a clown, which divided them sweets to a large number of children, killing them. Finally listening to the story of Gilles de Rais, a Marshal of Joan of arc, a man who allegedly fought for faith in God and finally term committed a series of atrocities, among them who are murdering hundreds of children.These three ideas were that joined to get the central idea of the film. To achieve a greater closeness with the times, her it linked to Nazism and its record of children's experiments during the war.This is how they will make up the two main characters. Klaus, because you are connected to the iron lung, is confined to the machine and the room in which it is found. At the same time, this situation ends cutting off both his wife and his daughter Rena (Gisèla Echevarría). This type is a pedophile and a sadist, which committed a series of atrocities and whose apparent remorse came too late. The other sidewalk is Angelo, a notoriously disturbed young man, which lost the purity and innocence that there may be a child, the same time that he was sexually violated by Klaus. Now the young man has become an extension of Klaus, willing to continue with the atrocities of the nazi ex-oficial began years ago. The difference is that now the roles have changed. Klaus is now who is helpless and scared with the presence of the Angelo who is now where abused and tortured physically and psychologically from him.The plot is rugged and the truth is that the performances, the colours of the film, scenarios and the soundtrack help quite achieve an oppressive atmosphere and quite disturbing. The film occurs mostly in shades of grey or bluish, breaking this pattern only in the few scenes of foreign, which are otherwise quite grey and with the irruption of the color red in three scenes quite specific. This same concern for the visual is complemented with gloomy House in which the film takes place and used costumes, notably that of David Sust which ends up looking like a participant of the Hitler youth. Actions are generally pretty good, protruding from the young Sust, who builds a character quite scary and as sadistic as his "mentor".The soundtrack was conducted by Javier Navarrete ("El laberinto del fauno" 2006), which fits perfectly in the scenes where it is used, helping to increase the tension of these.The film is not exempt from some anecdotes of esoteric and the supernatural, character who align themselves with the problems that existed for lack of money. For example the actor David Sust presented a transient blindness during the making of the film. One of the leading galleries of the House collapsed, dropping a piece of enormous glass very close to the producer of the film. They also had that there was a part of the House where never is could shoot, because there were always strange problems. The director also mentioned that some hallucinogenic mushrooms are known as dealt with in the covens were found in the garden of the House. The truth is that this movie has scenes that are difficult to see, and even more difficult to digest, especially scenes involving children of itself are quite strong. It is a good film, considered to be within the genre of horror, in which translates the evil present in humans in the more obscure manner possible, without necessarily resorting to a large number of scares. The film meets fully the Mission of disrupting the viewer at the same time that the end gives us a reflection on the effects of a circle of abuse, which apparently you cannot escape.Recommended film, but not for everyone. It is definitely a work that can hardly go to oblivion. At least meet with warned. |
3,094 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/981 | Ramón Balcells | Déjà Vu | 3 | 5 | muchocine | One film more than passable, with a last minute absolutely entertaining with their strengths and weaknesses (I think that equally), and nor do I believe it to be remembered. | Since then, increasingly is they are wearing more with the translation of titles (and subtitles) in the latest film releases of Spain. His latest "achievement" is Déjà Vu (changing the past). I know I seem very demanding, but it is that this subtitle there is extra. "Déjà vu" means "already seen" and not "changing the past". But let's go to the grain. The new film by the brother of the prodigious (occasionally) Ridley, Tony Scott, has returned to his own: frenetic pace with a shocking picture, but, however, with a simple script and several deceptions (to the public). It is not that Déjà Vu is a little credible film, but is directly a hundred percent amazing film. Although it is true that the director nor intends to have us we believe. OK, clearly that feeling already seen or lived is a mental effect, but by God, about the program to the Minority Report (but visionando the past) isn't any trick of the mind, it is simply bullshit. So we could say Déjà Vu presents a mixture of genres, for my taste, too abusive: science fiction, thriller, action, adventure, drama and romance (these latter two quite away from what could be expected of the director of the fire of revenge). But well, on the other hand thank you Scott the balance between all of them, as much as some may appear inadequate to me. Of course, if you find defects to the film would find you, and several. Let's start with that so stimulating program for the protagonists, which allows them to travel in the past through a theory (or paranoia) that has invented such a Terry Rossio and Bill Marsilii. If one intends to shoot a film with fictional touches, that does not abuse. And it seems that Tony Scott has not understood yet. I think that the idea of dealing with that feeling so exhilarating of déjà vu and then add an invented program that allows you to travel in time of one it is really nothing credible is already good enough. So much of the film (in particular, the first hour) relies on this silly nonsense that you mess and makes the film a quality quite lower which would have had if he had avoided. Another defect is the false drama, Yes. In the fire of vengeance had dose in abundance of pure and simple drama, which were fairly credible. Here, Déjà Vu, they are completely unrelated to our feelings. Let me explain: the film can't you convey the feeling of despair the protagonist and much less the victim (one inadequate, in artistic terms, Paula Patton). So that the main shortcomings of this film are based on abuses of genres or terms that a tape of this kind, is better to avoid them, either because it is more credible and entenedora, and therefore more enjoyable, or by the simple fact that sobran.But we must also congratulate the brother of Ridley as to convey the sense of déjà vu excellently and provide us a tape entretenídisima (especially in the last hour). This last part is based on the outbreak of the plot, in a less credible way, on this occasion, makes you, at least, entering the game. No more destriparé the plot because but finish by explain this interesting end. And another good aspect of the film is, always nice to see, performance by Denzel Washington (authentic collaborating director). It is not to have a brilliant interpretation, that its role is not to be much, but it's nice to see him make these bromillas always and provide its Doug Carlin a little more of humanism. The subtraction of the cast is simply correct, although the semi-protagonista, Paula Patton, is really bad. He can't cry, he can't provide credibility. In short, that would have greatly improved with the magnificent Ashley Judd. One film more than passable, with a last minute absolutely entertaining with their strengths and weaknesses (I think that equally), and that I do not think it is remembered, at least that her return to feeling.The phrase "Atentos, are about to witness a murder". |
3,095 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3971 | José Córdoba | Soy leyenda | 3 | 5 | muchocine | I am legend is a film very estimable during much of footage, though unable to reach that something more that you would turn it into a classic of science fiction.A pity, since its inception and the interpretation of Will Smith gave for more. | After long time without writing here, it the time to return to activity. And, instead of starting with oldest criticisms, will begin directly with the last film we've seen: I am legend, the third film adaptation of the novel by Richard Matheson.Si in previous versions the role fell to two heavyweights as Vincent Price or Charlton Heston, this time the charge is Will Smith, the only actor today able to attract mass audiences to the cinema, as it has been demonstrated once again with the release of this film.I am Legend recounts how after a biological epidemic has exterminated the entire population, the last man alive, and therefore immune to the epidemic trying to survive and find a cure for the evil he triggered, and to thus cure the beings inhabiting the night that have already lost much of their humanity.The beginning of the film is masterful. The film opens with a scene of a newsletter where a doctor, superbly played by Emma Thompson (in a surprising cameo), unveils the population who found a cure for cancer. After this news and a fade to black, the director shows New York City three years later, totally desolate and converted into a real jungle. Only the noise of the engine of a car tells us that there are at least a live human being. What follows is an unusual hunting scene, with Will Smith chasing in his car to give hunting a herd of herbivorous mammals. They have just passed 10 minutes of film and director has been fully introduced to the viewer in action and on the premise of the film. A brilliant start, certainly of the best seen this year.Lawrence during the rest of the footage shows its good to do after the cameras. It is not a director of great visual strength, but it is very effective in his choice of plans, leaving them breathe without atolondrar or stun the viewer with continuous changes in level. In fact, by his narrative, Lawrence is shown as a director of old school more in the line of John McTiernam(La_jungla_de_cristal) and Richard Donner(Arma_Letal) to Michael Bay(La_Roca). The script is also shown to be very effective in the first part of the film, perfectly conveying the loneliness of the character (aided surely by the great interpretation of Will Smith and the direction of Lawrence) and her despair. On the negative side the inclusion of two characters in the story well advanced, behind a vergonzante(por_fuera_de_lugar) speech anti-racist and a too rapid, almost abrupt ending. That coupled with a topical design of the creatures of the night (and a few lousy special effects), Miss somewhat ruined the magnificent beginning of the film. A pity.In the interpretation, Will Smith dominates the film from beginning to end, which may be his best performance to date, resulting fully convincing in his portrait of a man alone and tormented by his mistake. Without a doubt, the best of the film along with his top.In the rest of sections the film is irregular, highlighting its formidable design of production and its successful photography, being very irregular effects special, capable of the best: New York devoured by the jungle, and the worst scenes: creatures of the night. As for the music of James Newton Howards, only commenting that it is in a very discreet second level, a very similar approach to Alan Silvestri in Castaway, film that has more than one similarity with it.In short, I am legend is a film very estimable during much of footage, though unable to reach that something more that you would turn it into a classic of science fiction. A pity, since its inception and the interpretation of Will Smith gave for more. Even with everything, a recommended film whose 100 minutes spend flying. |
3,096 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1010 | Oscar Cantero | Blood creature | 2 | 5 | muchocine | More than worthy product, taking into account, that Yes, the limitations of any kind of the era, country and gender. | The truth is I didn't have too many references of the filipino horror film. And when I say that it did not have too many you could say almost none. I had always had the feeling that should be something akin to the New Zealander, with much viscera and offal everywhere. To satisfy final push that latent curiosity gave me see the special dedicated to him on this website.I got to do me with a copy of Blood criature, apparently and according to I have read of other members of this section, and other information that I got after devote some time to this, is who gave the kick-off.The fact that it was based on a short story by H.G. Wells was in a sense a small at least some quality assurance in the script. And the truth is that despite everything expected me a kind of grotesque then not proved to be such. Taking into account technical, economic and all limitations, Blood Criature turns out to be a pretty decent product, insofar as it considers it with "special criteria" to put it in some way. After a start that can brand intense, continuing a somewhat pesaroso development which again revitalize a quite movidito ending.The truth is that, or rather the monster causes hilarity, but as I said before, should take into account the constraints of all kinds of this production. The interpretation is almost the least, because the truth is that too much there is complexity in the characters.That Yes, as curious fact tell that I missed the introduction in which alert you that will ring a Bell before the abrupt scenes to prevent the sensitive stomach, and as I see on the criticisms of other colleagues and some websites it is a curious fact of the film. But the truth is that in the version I've seen it appears.Finally, as experience is not bad at all, but the truth is that it isn't that it is willing to delve into this genus. Although who knows, so I see two or three more and I just dazzling. |
3,097 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/909 | Yul B. | Casino Royale | 2 | 5 | muchocine | This is not the Bond that the public expected. I do not mean because it is worse than others. It is that it is simply a different 007, which I think it disappoint many more purist fans. | This is not the Bond that the public expected.I do not mean because it is worse than others. It is that it is simply a different 007, which I think it disappoint many more purist fans.It is clear that the character of Ian Fleming has been reinvented to build a secret agent less subtle and more mercenary. Chivalry zero.What I don't know is if this change is that the parents of the child were already designed in advance a 180 degree turn in the franchise, without having chosen still the protagonist of the new release; or because they have been irresistibly compelled to do so by the final choice of Daniel Craig, an actor with aspect of bully. Safe to say that it has been the first thing.What is clear is that this transformation has had its victims: essential q. does an appearance at any time, and the efficient Moneypenny has been replaced by a Secretary with less sex appeal. This is logical, because the new Bond is now self-sufficient and not interested in loving jueguecitos. He's going to sack.However, this reinvention could justify the fact that we are before the first mission of the British Mi6 secret agent James Bond. By imagination, we would say that the boy is not yet refined.Its double zero category (licence to kill; and how kills) obtained after ruthlessly murdering two major criminals. And for his first work, Bond is sent to Madagascar to capture a dangerous terrorist named Obanno. After several investigations, and countless undisciplined actions that bring headaches to his boss M. (Judie Dench), get locate an international banker, called Le Chiffre (Mads Mikkelsen), whose occupation is to exploit financial resources to terrorist groups. Bond will try to ruin him in a game of poker millionaire held at Casino Royale in Montenegro with the assistance, inter alia, an agent of the British public Treasury, Vesper Lynd (Eva Green).During the first hour of footage, the film has a rhythm incredible, highlighting a frantic pursuit of Bond excelled, running behind the terrorist Obanno through the streets of Madagascar. Bareback, no cars or similar vehicles. The spectacular end of this persecution on an Embassy is the icing on one of the most vibrant scenes of recent titles in the series.Here is where we see the new 007 in all its splendor, and see that we we have James Bond another pasta. Wild and visceral.But once past those (approximately) 60 minutes, the tape drops significantly. He loses his initial pace, and becomes slow, predictable and with little interest. His lowest moment coincides with the plot developed around the game of poker in Montenegro, precisely the scenes giving title to this movie. The majority of external incidents occurring him bond during the game are implausible to seriously questioning me the words of Martin Campbell, director of?Did casino Royale?, referring to it as a tape that leaves behind the excessive fantasy of previous deliveries.As for the staging of this film, it is very similar to other titles, clearly influenced by the craft that Campbell has in this series Bond after being responsible for its resurgence with?Goldeneye?. Do the classic surrealist beginning of every 007 film has been devised for?Casino Royale? with an attractive style but without being a genius. I've missed the forced female silhouettes.As for the cast, Daniel Craig has done a good job as James Bond. And this must be qualified it. If we take as a basis the consolidated style that their predecessors have given to the character, Knight, conqueror, elegant, orderly in his performances, Craig unconvincing as 007. Here is where all the bad omens had since his election could have been confirmed as Bond.Pero is that the concept of the new 007 is different: is harder, impassive and uncontrolled. With this premise, Craig has built a very believable character, with great force, which you only recognize as Bond because he named his mission companions. It will be a matter of getting used to, but it not at odds on that line; However, I'll take Pierce Brosnan.Las interpretations of the rest of the main cast are not overly relevant. M. it has more presence in this film, so Dame Judi Dench has opportunity to offer longer his art, although in this case it is not too notable. Eva Green is correct and, for my taste, its beauty is not comparable to other Bond girls (I prefer the stunning murine Caterina, in the role of the wife of a terrorist that 007 bind.) (Delicatessen). And, with regard to Mads Mikkelsen makes an evil of the bunch, and the tears of blood are a story.?Casino Royale? I has entertained halfway, so with me has not achieved our desired objective. To make matters worse his end is intentionally unfinished, implying that the next installment, number 22, will be a continuation of this. If marketing maneuver flies?. |
3,098 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1684 | Jesus Lens | 300 | 5 | 5 | muchocine | I loved, has fascinated me and hit me. Does this mean that is a perfect movie or a masterpiece of cinema? Well not. But it was not what was requested of it. | What about "300" he has not said already? At this point, everyone knows that it will battle between Persians and Spartans, which takes place at Thermopylae and faithfully based on a comic book by Frank Miller. All of this is factual information which is collected on dozens of websites and blogs, magazines and newspapers of more varied. So, let's go with the subjective. And the subjective is that you found me a peliculón, which has made me a hundred, that has made me upload keystrokes, that I made drop chutes of adrenaline and has revolutionized me the endorphins.That I loved, has fascinated me and me has impactado.¿Significa that a perfect film or a masterpiece of cinema? Well not. But it was not what was requested of it. Failure, for example, the character of Xerxes. In the comic is more impressive, more noble, more Almighty, more enigmatic. His half-King and his half Dios are better achieved. In the film Xerxes is, rather, a drive, God of death. And the effect of grandeur that was the comic book that a little lastra.And the grotesque monsters also reach tire. Luckily, elephants, give them matarile very quickly. But the film is colossal. One is identified both with the history, that wants to be Spartan. Directly. And that asked it that the film: that was quite a sight. And it is. There has been much of the fidelity of the frames to the graphic work of Miller and Valley, but it is that they have been inspired, in turn, in reality. Or, at least, in reality we have at our disposal: own step of Thermopylae or classical paintings as David Jaques-Louis. And this have been added to the Christian iconography of, for example, San Sebastián aseteado, of a Jesus Christ passing the night in the garden of olives or a Judas who sold his master for thirty pieces of silver.Snyder, to shoot this film, has also benefited from another great classical imagery, as the stabbed Julius Caesar. And the spirit of war films here, of course. With a few dialogues efectistas and mythological, with strong phrases as the fight in the shade, with sequences such as the vessels arriving to the coast, we have seen in "Troy" or "Letters from Iwo Jima".We could talk about the theme of East and West and the protest that has made Iran on the treatment that is made of the Persians, but look at. Step. At least for the moment. Because I left the show so amazed that we have seen that talk about the reality I not want absolutely nothing. A spectacle of blood, violence, and manhood that is called on to alienating many and very diverse groups, but that to me I has mesmerized altogether.I'm going to re-read the comic book, surely will come back to see the movie, and if get me the bolunto, I buy up Spartan a sword and a shield to hang them on the wall of my house. Because the "300" deserve that and more. piece of film! |
3,099 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3538 | Tito Chinchan | Bender´s Big Score | 5 | 5 | muchocine | First of four DVD films designed for the Futurama series which is a breath of fresh air to the fans that we are left hanging with the suspension of the series. In my humble opinion, brilliant and essential. | Director: Dwayne Carey-Hill. duration: more than an hour and half, as five long chapters.Release date: 27 November 2007 directly on DVD. In Spain, God will say.After two years without new Futurama things (as they are responsible for telling us in the film) again with a lot of force. Instead of doing what they did the Simpsons to his film (I found is not equal to many chapters) have decided to snag a few stories about all the characters and get a hiperlargo chapter as great as the best in 22 minutes. Exactly what we wanted and we wanted the fans. Gracias.la film is about many things, but basically nudist guys get through spam techniques, take over Planet Express. But not only that, if that fail to gain control of Bender through a subtle and elaborate computer virus, in which everyone could chop (if piqué I the day that got me a window messenger type "Bea says: Hi handsome, do want to see my webcam?" that I almost assume the mouse of emotion, is that you can chop either). Finally, it is also (the best resolved I never saw) time travel, love, friendship and many things more. Very completita, if Mr.Well, needless to say I'm a Futurama fan and am thrilled with the result. The stories are very well engarzadas, without great loss of rhythm (perhaps the part of the narwhal is something rare), and with an interesting argument. Each of the characters in the series out with roles more or less long (too bad the doctor Zoiberg who does not have more interventions). We have many references to other films, such as the saga of the war of the galaxies and some more winks to the audience are welcome. Humor is always, although I would say that they have bolted and they have gotten jokes in the series I do not remember they dare, as the why Al Gore lost the election against Bush (great, sure the latter will make thank you very much).To sum up, first of the four DVD films designed for the Futurama series which is a breath of fresh air to the fans that we are left hanging with the suspension of the series. In my humble opinion, brilliant and essential.We must see it.Besitos.P.D: See original version brings curious things, as Bender is actually Spanish and many words said them in Spanish, such as beer.Pd2: In Spain at the moment it has no release date on DVD, but the American version has the subtitles in Castilian, which can make the investment. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.