Unnamed: 0 int64 0 3.88k | id stringlengths 44 47 | autor stringclasses 181 values | title stringlengths 2 71 | rank int64 1 5 | maxRank int64 5 5 | source stringclasses 1 value | summary stringlengths 9 396 | body stringlengths 352 24.4k ⌀ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2,800 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/449 | Kiko de España | Los bingueros | 4 | 5 | muchocine | The best comedy of the unforgettable (and unique) couple Esteso/Pajares in a descacharrante Vortex which only fail you your last fifteen minutes. | My newly acquired "Lizenz" dvd premiere Summit of Spanish of late 1970s comedy. Mariano Ozores directs with firm pulse what is perhaps the best comedy of the unforgettable (and unique) couple Esteso/Pajares in a whirlwind descacharrante, which just fail their last fifteen minutes because he totally loses the pace and does not show a climax or something like.Anyway, yesterday I descojoné as if it were the first time I watched it, with these clever phrases (especially of Pajares) and gestures (Esteso before you play your first bingo) and I'm missing to Antonio Ozores, very little role for such a great comedian.Editing is wonderful, with a clean master, current interviews and audiocomentarios I've tried and they seem fun.I guess that SazMann not soon leave me a recadito on my alleged "cinephiles", but I say with our heads held high collection DVD of these cracks was something that many were calling for a lot of years.Mythical phrases of the film:Traenos a few skewers of something fun. Frenzy! Row, scratch that! And my favorite, the Pajares says when Ozores leaves no win anyone in the bingo: but as we are going to win anything with this shark 2 hence that swallows everything!!!!Lol, her writing and I descojono. Torrent should learn that sometimes, the secret lies in the simplicity. (As it did in the first part) I wanted to see her and even man Omega, who came to see the last half hour descojonó on his couch. 8. |
2,801 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3080 | Andrés Pons | Prey (Safari sangriento) | 1 | 5 | muchocine | I was surprised to hear that in a film of the disastrous Pereira Director of other pearls of "Dracula 3000" or "Enemy public number 1 my father", could count in a series b budget with two performers of some standing. | I was surprised to hear that in a film of the disastrous DARREL ROODT Director among other pearls of Dracula 3000 or enemy No. 1 public my father could count in a series b budget with two performers of some standing.BRIDGET MOYNAHAN starred real blockbusters like me for example robot. Meanwhile PETER WELLER is the unforgettable protagonist of ROBOCOP. Only to see both protagonists, I decided to take a look making a big mistake. Another film about murderous animals in is occasion lions, which seems a copy of CUJO adapted to the ferocity of these cats.Family trapped in a car to withstand the onslaught of the beasts all done without the slightest narrative style, with very poor special effects, a chaotic screenplay, typical production that not desentonaría in the timeslot of Teleplays in antena 3. Its two protagonists contribute something ex officio in the mess. |
2,802 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4355 | Alex Baldoví | Sweeney Todd | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Tim Burton has done again it. Create a musical based on his style, dark, dismal and bizarre was a difíficl task, but the director has done in a masterful way. One of the best Tim Burton film. | I was delighted! Mira that my duo Tim Burton and Johnny Depp not makes me laugh but I have to say that the movie is very well! The director manages to mix of masterly his dismal, dark and Gothic style in a great musical. And say great music because the film are almost 2 hours, hours to do not become long. Is possible that by the middle of the movie the pace down a little, but then quickly recovers. What he said. A music pure and hard, come on, think that 90-95% of the film is sung. After a magnificent sequence of the principle, to 3 or 4 minutes can already see people to sing. A magnificent sequence of the principle accompanied by a great soundtrack. In general the entire film has good pieces of music, and the leitmotiv of Sweeney Todd mola! The actors are great. Who would say that Johnny Depp sing well, eh? Jejej. But the role he goes like ring finger, and is perfect in the world Tim Burton. Helena Bonham Carter also makes it very well, they are a good Duo. Songs I have to say that it hooks, or at the very least, yesterday I went out of the room singing a par.xD but well, that if something stands out the film is by its (as is likely) design of production and its art direction, as always, are very well taken and perfectly knowing what you want to show. The film with muted tones already seeks the grim and gloomy looks. Only stresses in this context of darkness (quite gores) splashes blood there for more than half of the film. Brutal, too much blood even for Tim Burton! Lol is that the history hooks. The truth is that it is ingenious, and as he could not miss has a couple of touches of humor are welcome. Come on, I was delighted. It would not with high expectations and at the end sales of the film with a good flavor of mouth and watching one of the best films of Tim Burton, his style is 100%. By the way, almost so I left. What end. Okay there are perhaps a few predictable things that can be guessed, but the flat end. The flat end is the very best I've seen in a long time. And I'm not saying more. All to see it because you like it. Unless odiéis musicals... |
2,803 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3627 | Dario Lavia | La fuente de la vida | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Spiritual concepts in Hollywood film. | Raised in the film three narrative strands, differentiated (in principle) by the protagonist (Hugh Jackman) haircut. 1. A Spanish conqueror lost in the thicket of the Guatemalan jungle is determined to find the supposedly legendary "Tree of life", having to maintain his iron will despite the disloyalty of their subordinates or the aboriginal resistance. 2 - Dr. Tom Creo, a research physician who has his young wife Izzi (Rachel Weisz) sick of terminal cancer, run a race against the clock by checking if the novel compound obtained on the basis of a Central American plant species is able to back not only the process of ageing of an ape but also a tumor carcinogenic. 3 - A suprahumana entity that lives in a planetoid with a tree species about to die is rush your trip Astral through outer space in pursuit of a star adored by the ancient Maya.Of the three, is the second (we assume) which raises the real history of the film. It is the beautiful Izzi which gives her husband a book that she has been writing with the romantic story of the Conqueror Spanish across an ocean to save his Queen and find the legendary source that a Franciscan father claims to have evidence that there is. This literary plot is which gives rise to the first story that unfolds as a mythical version of the tragedy of the marriage I think. This vision of reality, jumped to a metaphysical analysis, with the completely shaved doctor and taking the position of the Lotus in order to raise their level cosmic and spiritual (according to the transcendental hierarchy of the discovery that plans to carry out). The error philosophical consider death as an illness resolves in three frames with brightness lyrical, both visual and artistic, leaving clear (at least during the denouement of the film) to die is not a trauma but the most important event in life. |
2,804 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/112 | Daniel Galindo | Volver | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Delicious piece of real life, portrait with envy, quarrels and resentments to the surface | Not disappointed Almodóvar with this exercise of cinema in its purest form, a costumbrista, vibrant and concise story, in which exudes humor, and that he speaks of the death.Let the high bar, recovering a tone that pervaded characteristic of its first stage titles, leaving visible the it autocita to what have I done to deserve this?, in particular to the mother who comes to resolve issues pending, and the acid humor of darkness.Levels of Almodóvar, studied to the millimetre, are usually living paintings. Rarely a level concentrated so much as the first, with all the women of the people in the cemetery, adecentando the tombs of face to the day of the dead. The costumes of the sisters protagonists anticipate the bright and colorful accent that will dominate all the footage, full always eternal symbols in his filmography (maternity hospitals, neighbouring, etc.) and any new, as the table stretcher.It gives us a chorus formed by six strong characters. Through them he draws women recalls his childhood in La Mancha, but far from proposing a reflection, it assimilates them and recasts, entering a round, surprising story by their portentous twists. We understand this point as opposite to the dalliances they did err in La mala educación.It shows their feminine in all its intensity characters although somewhat idealized, hence superb interpretations of Penelope Cruz. His role-playing exercises spine although she puts much of his party, leaving behind their best work so far, of No move. Aware that the Spanish housewives have some fringe or pejorative connotation, Almodóvar has become an Italian casalinga Cruz, a housewife with character and glamour, a mixture between the racial beauty of Sophia Loren and the athletic bearing of Silvana Mangano.La accompany his travels of the people to the city - and vice versa - one close and distant at the same timeDo, Lola Dueñas, Chus Lampreave, exploited to the maximum and a very correct Yohana Cobo which is not amohína to both together wonder? its presence in surreal situations serves as anchor on the more earthly side of Almodóvar. We continue to hear Blanca Portillo, "this film animal", is the great discovery of Almodóvar to the big screen. The truth is that their contribution to the career of the actress is similar to that in his day made to Leonor Watling talk to her (and Alejandro Amenábar to Dueñas on sea) inside. And is not nothing to shore up, with much skill, return to the celluloid of an actress that was already big in television and film (remember the dog in the Manger and the color of the clouds) and, above all, huge theater.The manchego with everyday but carried to its extreme histrionic and very funny situations is reunited. Account to do this with one of his muses, which made its first six films. The grateful and fruitful work of Carmen Maura gives a dimension, leaving anecdote (or surrealist dream) as you look at it an interpretation that in the hands of another actress had been somewhat risky.Under a first appearance of fable, return is a delicious piece of real life, a portrait with envy, quarrels between sisters, resentments to the surface of skin, mourning, phones, shoes and rebequitas, many rebequitas. A nod to the more traditional Spain, the neighborhood and the people that most of us have grown. |
2,805 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3286 | Ivan Sainz-Pardo | Redacted | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Not get nor much less do trace irregular career of its director or contribute anything new. | The film is shot in Jordan halfway between a mockumentary and a conventional fiction. The mixture supposed initially significantly increase the realism for even more impact on the critical message towards the conflict in Iraq, but precisely that mixture is which is not working properly. Brian de Palma is not Paul Greengrass and the first appears to believe that realism is achieved basically showing the faces of boredom of the marines in a guard post at the pace of a classical music for minutes. Palma mix video cameras, security cameras, Youtubes, style of story and film format but without much success little that the viewer controls minimally the coherence of the cinematographic language. The result is not away from a series of prepared stagings and some good performances which however fail never seem real. And we are then left alone with the history and this because it is not too original nor holds any remarkable surprise for us. It was among others, the same Brian de Palma who already told us this same story in 89 with "Hearts of iron". What was on the Viet Nam war and this now is supposedly inspired by the massacre of Mahmudiya. And I then wonder: what is the message that gives me as a spectator? that the marines get bored and unmotivated and confused rape and kill without mercy in Iraq? what war does not make sense?According to the director: "the film is an attempt to bring to the American people the reality of what is happening in Iraq" "Are images that will stop the war." "One only expects that these images indignant to the public enough to motivate its legislators to vote against this war," staging a violation of some energúmenos for more effectively draw the attention to the American people with a bit of care is under my opinion give information biased and sensationalist, because the real killers and responsible travel with chauffeur, play golf and lie their ass in offices of luxury while taking decisions that bombed and they are left to die without any regard to thousands of people in poor countries but with natural resources plunder. Wars kill, is violated, is amputates, steals, was humiliated, tortured and this is unfortunately so obvious that it would have interested me much more observe the miserable and frivolous lives of the real culprits of the conflict and not a couple of illiterate Texans with license to kill and rape.Half the resolution of the real case, the impact of those affected on the one hand and the other is left in the movie and discovered great that in reality all this exposed in somewhat disheveled manner, without much I care or talent, only to cause in some way. That if it ends with a series of photographs of murdered Iraqi civilians, as if it were actually a video of Manos Unidas, but with that one, actually, as a viewer, do not know very well how to react after the whole.Redacted left me cold and although it is clear that whatever is done to try to espabilar consciousness apeleladas in the Western world is necessary and always well intentioned and received, as movie fails nor much less trace the irregular career of its director or contribute anything new. |
2,806 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1513 | Tito Chinchan | El Motorista Fantasma (Ghost Rider) | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Another one of the Marvel factory on a motorist that night Burns by a deal he made with Belcebú. It is not even the worst gender, sinvergüeza Daredevil, nor the best, see Spider-man, X-men or the controversial Hellboy. Total, to take the time and see a bit of special effects. | I guess all that I read you are waiting for a fierce criticism on this film. Well no, also do not understand many behaviors of that style. Let's see if I can explain, all movies can not be rated by the same standard, i.e., a porn movie is valued by lustrous members and bodies of scandal, not by his script. Similarly, if a comedy does not make me laugh, but has a perfect Assembly, the film is bad to not cover its comic goal. As with the films of pass passes bullet to frame the same or at least similar.The film is about a kid who does stunts with his father on the bike. One day discovers that his father has a fatal disease of need, so pacta with the devil that this remove you the disease. By this agreement, this becomes a sort of Mefistóteles sicario, as so many were before. Becomes the Ghost Rider, modern version of the Ghost Rider. One was basically going to horse and another motorcycle.Well, because another one of superheroes. The script harmful, as it was expected, with a motorist tormented that he tries to kill at all costs and that the devil avoids. A love that cannot be achieved by that these gentlemen have to be lonely (things of contracts). And a curse that does not know well as remove. Very typical. The special effects are very good, with emphasis on the stage of the skyscraper that is superb. And all becomes quite boring, with a few very flojitos dialogues, and with little action, which is the most important thing. These films have to have more fights and less metaphysical rolls of what suffers. Burning skull seems an advertisement for Hemoal rather than a movie of a guy.In short, another one from the factory on a motorist that night Burns by a treatment that, Marvel did with Belcebú. It is not even the worst gender, sinvergüeza Daredevil, nor the best, see Spider-man, X-men or the controversial Hellboy. Total, to take the time and see a bit of especiales.¿Y effects how not usa helmet that boy?Besitos.P.D: I have to write the phrase peak of the film. It says the bad malísimo, with all the solemnity that the situation calls for "my name is Legion, for we are many". Hahaha, brilliant. |
2,807 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2813 | Rafa Ferrer | Cabeza de muerte | 1 | 5 | muchocine | The argument, or the actors, scares or the soundtrack, reaches hooked in no time (more laughter than screams were heard in the audience), and if one is annoyed at some point is not horror, but by the increases in sound, until my grandmother with her sonotone to minimize had scared. | Best of a morning press pass is not always the film, it was as I was a footballer was with more interest to the cañeo after that with the hope of making a good match, here Mr.Trujillo sent me to see this film (at his own request) urging me to meet several of the characters that populate (flora and fauna) in muchocine.net forum (if you like the film)(, you know), and so I got myself, after fighting me first with the people from Deaplaneta what else give them how many people will watch the movie if then are 4 monkeys that inhabit the room? there I stood with my phone waiting to know these characters, it was they who, at the entrance to the room I knew to my.After the intro of excitement and joy, we go with the film; I have to say that the horror genre not I am passionate about and that while all my friends went to the movies with the bride to be she who is "achuchara" to him during the slide, to my I was always always otherwise, that was I who had just scared shitless catch of his arm.Starting from that side I can be scary things so mixed from Frog Gustavo until the man in the sack, but this film, which is sponsored by the DEA, the project man and the Foundation for help against drug addiction, scary, laugh or anything, it is true that must be envy at least that other films left in limbo (trillion), and that however, although with its stupid and laughable approach has become a reality does Cuantas with best argument will live the dream of the righteous?Neither the argument, or actors, or scares, the soundtrack nor history reaches hooked in no time (in the audience were heard more laughter than screams of terror), and if one is annoyed at some point is not terror that run through his body, but by the (unjustified) increases in sound, even my grandmother with her sonotone to minimize had scaredIt is not joke.In the poster exhibition of newspapers that have given us just upon arrival to the room (and that a critic has thrown with rabies to the ground half of the footage.) embody the opinion of its director, who boasts of mixing the most narrative film, the mystery and Eastern cinema where? To me that she made a film and have been distributed to another.In short, someone pay 6? by see such crappy? (I do not, of course). |
2,808 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2185 | Francisco Bellón | Oceans 13 | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Do Ocean? s Thirteen is a film of entertainment, elegant, charming and fun as their characters. | To see George Clooney, Brad Pitt, Steven Soderbergh and company, one thinks if really what they do together in a movie can be called work or is simply a meeting of a band of buddies that are to have a fun time. In an industry in which multiply the disagreements between partners, it's nice to see a real group of friends enjoying their work.Do Ocean? s Thirteen recovers the best spirit of the original film of Danny Ocean, although it is a remake of La gang of eleven. On this occasion, Danny Ocean (George Clooney), Rusty Ryan (Brad Pitt), Lynus Caldwell (Matt Damon) and company trace a vendetta against Willie Bank (to Al Pacino), former partner of Reuben (Elliott Gould), to leaving tirado and on the verge of death. After the failed Italian experiment of the second film in the series Ocean, the action returns to develop in Las Vegas, with all the charm, mysticism and power struggles that surround the city of sin. In Ocean? s Thirteen leave aside the artificial history and eliminate secondary to focus on what really frames wants the Viewer: see the band doing burst the banks of a great Las Vegas casino. Steven Soderbergh repeats the keys to success, counting on a quick script, not too convoluted (many times the success is in the simplicity), and full of humor. One of the novelties is the removal of the female characters (except the of Ellen Barkin, the bad), which remaining intensity as a whole, and without them the history improvement, acquiring a greater packaging. And how, the main attraction of the tape are not actors, charming, attractive, fun, and scoundrels, rogues and thieves. From the ringleader, this master of deception called a Brad Pitt who laughs at himself, George Clooney, and ending in an Al Pacino which outboard the role of very bad. With similar mimbres, they are able to follow the saga almost to infinity.Do Ocean? s Thirteen is a film entertainment, elegant, charming and fun as their characters, and that neither misleading nor takes by fool the viewer at any time. And although it cost say that such elements are a great virtue, with the current film scene, we must surrender to the evidence. |
2,809 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3650 | Estesoyo | Death Proof | 1 | 5 | muchocine | The last straw mental Tarantino... another mess that only can be understood under the context of the fortune that has amassed the guy and the desire to go clubbing with his Mexican friend. | The last straw mental Tarantino. Another mess that only can be understood under the context of the fortune that has amassed the guy and the little interest to any product quality. I guess that it will have moved it well with his Mexican friend and the girls that come out semi-desnudas and that is the only thing that mattered to him. If that was the goal for puta madre uncle. Mission accomplished. Now, as the film is one of the worst shit I've seen in a long time. 'Death Proof' is like 'To test of death'. something as well as immortal, although as refers to the car not be if very applicable. Well, the nonsense is a specialist of cinema, devoted to crash cars now encorre girls beautiful and light hulls for stamping against them on the road. Pèlícula? It is divided into two parts, the first is get away with killing the girls and the second is with the toebox of the shoe, with a genuine film specialists, giving you what you deserve.That's all. Perhaps shot otherwise would have been able to be well or at least be curious, but thus raised is vomit. To see: supposed that it imitates bad horror, the serie-z films of recent years. Damn, they are much better than this shit. But well, the film has cuts, color changes. all kinds of induced failures (it) trying to imitate the movies before, when they were in rolls before the arrival of the digital image. 80% Of the time also have an ass onscreen. Also imitating these semi-eróticas horror films, but that with Tarantino becomes vulgar and uncouth. Without lower interest unless you are a grain-filled teenager who has not ever seen a butt... No comment. The film becomes long because there's nothing for. but to make matters worse Tarantino makes us to torture with their talks to the Woody Allen drunk. This was his grace in his early films, especially in 'Pulp Fiction' where was curious to hear to that bunch of illiterate spoken ill of their nonsense. But this is already happening in dark brown. hold the two small groups of aunts wrong caradas and worst spoken saying nonsense after another is the task of a genuine freak of Tarantino. I was personally about to turn off the player at least six times. and I held my because I have endured other worst and here I am not going to be less, but it is certainly not worth any trouble. The dialogs are tasteless and boring, not even get cause, which I guess was a target of the film.The thing is very bad in the descending line of Tarantino: each thing that makes is a little worse than the previous. The following is scary to go to see her.Again Tarantino us torture coming out in his film, and is the uncle is not that it is ugly, it's disgusting. Better if he hid behind the camera. Kurt Russell is wrong and it does not hurt, but it is not enough to lift the history. The aunts give grima see them, half naked and dropping a taco after another. Buff, only for trained estomagos.A curious thing: Zoe Bell plays herself in the movie. It really is a specialist which has doubled to Uma Thurman in 'Kill Bill' and a lot of famous. Here's a crazy role (was supposed that she is) and is that at the end gives 'woolly pal' to the smug Kurt Russell. Little more remarkable.Me ashamed to admit that I've seen this shit. |
2,810 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/838 | Tito Chinchan | Porco rosso | 3 | 5 | muchocine | It is ok. It is not a wonder, as many would have us believe, but can be seen by both children and adults. | As I have read a review about this movie, I'm going to summarize, for once I I culturization. It is that he was asked to Miyazaki (again him) a medium of entertainment for a few airlines, in such a way that their passengers clear mind and soul. But he was encouraged with the theme and created a film, rather than as requested. This is the reason why leave at first titles in many languages. That should explain everything.The film is a pig to fly seaplanes (so said, bad it is). It is before it was human, but disenchanted with humanity became pig. How live the rise of fascism in her country, at the end of the 1920s, decides to deserting the army and become a bounty hunter. Despite being a pig, he is the best pilot and it has encandilada most beautiful women from the bar of seaplanes, one such Gina. And then things go and out the air pirates more stupid than a mata of beans.Well, if we exceeded the first scene of the pilot pig, have before us a great animated film. The script and the development of the same is pretty well, though not to be sublime. Rather it seems to be geared towards a more youthful adult audience. History of the pork is good, although not understood as Gina fell in love with him. It should be a lesson that the director gives us about watching people inside and that. The action scenes are sympathetic with pirates always grace of idiots who are. In addition, is the kind that never seen die to anyone (although Yes die) so it is pleasant.In short, it's okay. It is not a wonder, as many would have us believe, but can be seen by both children and adults. I recommend.Besitos.P.D: Rent Porco Rosso its islet?Pd2: Porco Rosso means pork Crimson, heh, heh. You're a Crimson pig, a Crimson pig you are! |
2,811 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3489 | Sandra Ríos | Leones por Corderos | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Recognizing that it is not a film for all types of viewers, I recommend it because it is interesting, it generates debate ethics, is it has a huge capacity to make us think and reflect on our actions. | After what happened on September 11, 2001, history and especially the Americans split in two. In recent years we have enjoyed several tapes directly or indirectly taking this fact which still hurts the whole world. But within all elaborated so far, this new film directed, produced and acted by Robert Redford would like to emphasize that for 7 years was absent from the issue of the direction of films after the movie "The legend of Bagger Vance". And is that within all made this a political and some complaint interesting, bold, daring and clever character that after everything, puts on the table the necessary elements to focus on reflection.Lions for Lambs is structured within a supremely present time, taking events, involving characters and institutions or spiny and vital systems in the events which today have been developed as a result of 9/11. Three specifically are these elements Redford brings into play: as a place, used the war of Afghanistan, as a system policy with the weight of all his power and as characters to a politician, a journalist and an idealistic Professor. A film where arises every minute the importance of taking action against what is happening around us and punishes our indifference and apathy to tackle them and be truly split, because we really are built with them. These three characters represent a contrast of our society, no doubt, but that in essence, enclose the soul of the 3 professions that can most influence the minds and collective thinking.The same Redford embodies one of these characters, the idealistic Professor, the rest compose it the twice winning the Oscar Meryl Streep and almost lifetime nominations which makes the role of journalist and who shares for the first time set with Tom Cruise, producer in addition to this project. With them is built a few very good, long and heavy dialogues that should not be to the liking of the public but that enclose approaches that go beyond a superfluous discussion meaningless. Involve the importance that charge the media in this type of problems is something transcendental. A slight feeling of guilt glimpse of this tape to the lambs of the media to take power they handle responsibly. Responsibility than to past unnoticed, because we must not ignore politicos lions have derailed the strict freedom possessed by the media. Nonsense debatable from the film for the reason that I just outlined.Another interesting approach is the idealistic teacher seeking with his wisdom to produce changes or be a common thread of the dispersed young minds. But that in turn contrasts at the end of the film, as a result of the decision that two of their students take act with wisdom and responsibility towards the society. It is this point that more controversy and disquiet generated out of the cinema. Questions like: does worth leaving the comfort to fight for ideals confused in favor of acquiring the peace to as place?, does worth leaving, even by some time, our daily lives: study, work, etc., to fight with limited warranties? And if I interiorizo this problem more, might ask: I would leave a son embark in a war, as hard quota imposed society me to do part of it?, are some of the questions that easily and deeply leaves us this tape.Surprisingly, the restraint with which are totally and absolutely subjective theories about the foreign policy of the United States. However, it is that same subjectivity, which can disturb many viewers that she see a merely film suitable only as a resource or almost a desperate cry of the defeaters of Bush, next to finish his second presidential term. Here, I can say that Lions for Lambs recreates a very intimate situation of Americans and their political system is a speaker of a significant percentage of those who do not share the absurd war that has cost them plenty of dollars and that them has been immersed in debts unthinkable years ago, so they are carried out under the pretext of applying justice to a fact that cost the lives of more than 2,000 innocent people. In addition I believe that rather than discuss the decisions of a Government, this film shows, the very first need to address everything that happens around us and we wake up to the importance of taking action as part of a group to which we belong, is for me a "enough already ignore", ceases to be lamb and turn you into a furious lion that advocates commitment to self-interest and the other low principles of harmony and peace.On the other hand, to focus the plot on 3 different spaces, the narrative of the film is lost a bit, as well as raise a self-paced for each situation what "you crazy" in some way to the public and that remove you the points needed to be a perfect movie. Despite this, the effort to move away from traditional productions of commercial cinematography of the greater the film industry and be seen as a film almost independent type at the expense of risks that this implies rescued this tape. In fact to a week of its release it has managed to raise little more than 20 million dollars.Recognizing that it is not a film for all types of viewers, I recommend it because it is interesting, generates debate, is unethical, has a huge capacity to make us think and reflect on our actions and to many critics will be part of the nominees in the coming Awards Oscar with true aspiration to take any. We'll see what happens. |
2,812 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4005 | Ana Belén Pacheco | Escuela de pringaos | 2 | 5 | muchocine | It seems that Billy Bob Thortom has definitely lost its way and needs to find its niche in the film. And is decanting dangerously by Disney comedy teen misfit made in USA. | It seems that Billy Bob Thortom has definitely lost its way and needs to find its niche in the film. And is decanting dangerously by Disney comedy teen misfit made in USA. Which is not that it is all bad, but those who believe that it has been a great actor feel deeply their loss.Pringados school is an anecdote in the unsuccessful film. Jon Heder (seen in blunder to glory) is Roger, a common type, works as an agent of mobility (these gentlemen that you get fines and do not reach the category of guards or police) and is not only a failure at work, can say the same about his personal life. It is not able to talk to a girl without faint is and even you want to in a program of older brothers as a volunteer. Why give the phone number of Doctor p. Acaba in this way in a class where will try to restore the self-esteem and teach him to be a man of truth. This is what at least teaches us the trailer. The reality is that half of the film takes place with the confrontation between Roger with Doctor P for the love of neighboring newly conquered by the apprentice. Does it lose grace? If the reality is that although that part I'm not fan of this type of one hundred is much more entertaining than the second and managed to boot I any laughter. I can not miss the tape the presence of unmistakable Ben Stiller, think that if they try to do something that smacks of comedieta you have to put the head albeit as a cameo. Another Lost in Translation on the tape is Michael Clarke Duncan (not ask why have deceived you because surely he had green ticket form) Although it seems that you as secondary in this type of comedy may earn the bread very well.Otherwise correct the direction of Todd Philips is already shooting with films such as Starsky & Hutch or Road Trip. It seems, that has really brought a little and dare not do once suggesting that it could unseat the Farrelly as new Disney comedy genius. |
2,813 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/167 | Silvia | La verdad oculta | 2 | 5 | muchocine | A pity that a topic interesting as insanity and genius can become an effective sleeping pill | Despite the excitement generated by this film (based on the play by David Auburn, winner of a Pulitzer), my personal opinion is far from most of the criticism. This drama aburrídisimo is not recommended to see at night because it is safer that you not reach credits...Gwyneth Paltrow plays Catherine, the daughter of a brilliant mathematician recently deceased (veteran Anthony Hopkins), who spent the last years of its existence prisoner of a sporadic madness. His daughter has a quite unstable carácer and she fears is fulfilled that proverb of "of such suit such splinter". The film revolves around the figure of the mathematical loco and from his relationship with his daughter we got to "know" better.After the death of Robert, Catherine begins a relationship with Hal (Jake Gyllenhall, best known for his role of atypical cowboy), who was an Assistant to his father in life, Cath who help solve the mystery about some mathematical manuscripts of doubtful authorship. The plot revolves eternally on the authorship of these manuscripts: are creation of Catherine or his father?. It is easy to guess the end. In short, is a pity that an interesting topic as madness and ingenuity can become an effective sleeping pill. Perhaps the director should have deepened more in the psychology of the characters to achieve the complicity of the Viewer. Recommended for fans of Gwyneh Paltrow and for those who fear paste it something from their parents. |
2,814 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3520 | Iñaki Bilbao | Scoop | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Nice comedy of Woody Allen. | Very nice comedy of Woody Allen, who returns for the charters, more or less, his first creative phase, when what they cared most was to laugh the Viewer.Here it succeeds well, thanks to a clever script, which is not to be the eighth wonder of the world, have them much better, but that makes everything work perfectly, with nothing that chirríe sobre or missing. Well, perhaps there a moment, one of the recent dialogues between Allen and Johansson, who is a tad long, but when one realizes, is passed to the next scene, so it is barely perceptible.The dialogues, once again, are great, with such outputs of tone and verbal incontinence that characterizes the characters embodied by the same Woody. He is very gesticuloso, true, but has always been so. But the important thing is what he says and there shows, once again, the wit, the spark and the grace to give and give.Comic situations, even though they are not to have, does function as a watch, giving rise to touches of intrigue and suspense, although always under the sieve of good humor.In short, a pretty fun movie of Woody Allen, who did what they wanted, as it should be always, because the viewer never should tell a creator must create what. What can do is criticize it. I say this because many people has criticized Allen for having made this movie good. Up there could get the public you tell a direct / screenwriter who must shoot or not!.In fn, which is less Woody's work? Minor compared to what? |
2,815 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1236 | Yojimbo | Asuntos pendientes | 4 | 5 | muchocine | A film that reveals a new twist in the modern detective plots. | At first glance, and according to other reviews, the film seemed to drink from Heat, this masterful film of Michael Mann to (how time passes) already has 11 years old. Some similarities are true, but only in its stylistic and commercial design.This film features two heavyweights of French cinema (Daniel Auteuil and Gérard Depardieu), a decent shooting sequences but far reaching the film by Mann and an atmosphere cold, blue. And end there similes. The script is very original and I presume have an autobiographical load and a personal contribution of very strong director. Very similar to cases of Habana Blues and A franco 14 pesetas. Not in vain Olivier Marchal was police while studying interpretation and made tasks of screenwriter, and surely his experiences are reflected in several moments of the film, completely original (the theft of the plate, the repudiation in an official act, etc?).The story is about two agents of polícia de different brigades that are wrong. Even the macguffin from the movie catch thieves in armored vans, the plot revolves around the envy and bad plays that certain police officers make for past reasons left to see but not are explained, which is that thank. None of the characters is a Saint, but there is a real cabronazo in history. The outstanding issues referred to in the film are quite clear as it progresses the footage. And with it increasing disbelief by cruelty without limits and a corruption and moral misery unprecedented. The strong point is a very hard, extremely plausible script.On the other hand think that the effort to write a hard story has left aside the aspect of the direction of actors, two monsters like this film are rather dull. Some portion of the footage calls the seriousness and even the apathy of an absorbent and hard work to be the protagonist, but as the characters are falling into a spiral of violence, the interpretations require much more pulse of which the director has been used. On the other hand, perhaps a few minutes, that removed the half-hour Pantry you end could accelerate and make the film more interesting.A decent film that can be seen with passion, as she was my case, and that reveals a new twist in the modern detective plots. |
2,816 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/827 | Daniel Galindo | Hijos de los hombres | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Once home, we reflecting from the aftershocks visual that we have experienced. | Grinding and continuous balance between hope and agony, this intense work warns us that heralded tomorrow is already here.The beginning, vibrant and concise, gives us the keys to what you see: a London of 2027 similar to the current one. a priori. The skilled Alfonso Cuarón introduces us to the overwhelming history with few planes and no unnecessary digital devices. Don't have more than a few fast, accurate panoramic and some other informative document which could well airing on current TV.Shot with intensity and tone looking for real at all times, the film strikes us a blow to us who placidly sitting in an armchair and what we see seems distant. The end of humanity is no longer in the hands of aliens or robots thing. Can we not die by a major earthquake or the impact of a meteorite; We will be the culprits and how terrible is the comfort with which we see.The V for Vendetta and 28 days later, the disturbing children of men is set in London, a Western capital where it is not surprising that the phenomenon of immigration takes bestial consequences, in a step beyond the given by Michael Winterbottom also essential code 46. We don't forget the winks to terrorism and the handling of citizens as puppets in the hands of the rulers. This fable it enlarges everything but is told so credibly that scared. What is more, until we can imagine the end, because we do not need answers to the questions raised.Camera in hand does not stop shooting during minutes made eternal. They are the so-called planos-secuencia, supported by the thunderous sound, it helps that I have the sensation of being inside a terrible simulated adventure. Clive Owen (Closer, Sin City, hidden Plan) and the convincing Clare-Hope Ashitey are our guides by this world sometimes poetic and always tremendous photographed so sad and expressive, with shades of gray and blue. The color is given by measures interpretations of Michael Caine and Julianne Moore. They provide the necessary point of comical tragedy to have more value.Not the eponymous book by P.D. James went through my hands, but I have commented that any resemblance to him was pure coincidence. It confirms our idea that we are two different forms of expression. As regards the substance, it is not that the text had more philosophical and humanistic content, but that Cuarón opted for suspense and action, filmic weapons which contribute for the message to arrive almost without warning and the slap is most famous. Once home, we reflecting from the aftershocks visual that we have experienced. |
2,817 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4370 | Cecil B. Demente | Matar o no matar: éste es el problema | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Only to see Vincent Price that elegantly degolla and beheading critics while quote Shakespeare, already worth. | Vincent Price reaches unusual interpretation quotas giving life to an actor of third that a complex revenge plot. This delicious drama combines horror, comedy and Shakespearean Theatre in equal parts in a cocktail capable of satisfying everyone, including critics! Tired of receiving critical killer for years, the Shakespearean actor Edward Lionheart (Price) Decides that the time give them with the iron curtain in the faces his critics has come. The plan is simple, kill them using methods inspired by the works of the great master: a chopping style Cimbelina, a stabbing in the manner of Julius Caesar, and the untimely removal of a pound of meat, inspired in the merchant of Venice. That proves, once and for all, that the world really is a stage. The scene of the crime!Talk about this film is to speak of Vincent Price, and Vincent Price is fucking master. Myth and icon of film culture, few players have so much charisma to justify with his mere presence not the existence of a film, but dozens of them, as it is the case. "This man was one of the causes of that serie B lived beyond a glittering era in the 1960s and 1970s and has left behind a unique legacy:"The collapse of the House of Usher"(1960),"The Raven"(1963),"The comedy of terrors"(1964) and"The abominable Dr. Phibes"(1971) to name a few.""Kill or not kill" drink precisely the formula of the latter, only that in "The abominable Dr. Phibes" direction and staging are superb and here, staying half gas. The director Douglas Hickox does justice to a script that had really great Crumb.Even so, the movie is a very recommendable divertimento, with much humour and high doses of bad baba. Price is great in their camaleónica interpretation of the actor been less with homicidal tendencies, giving that spoof tone you need the character. Just to see him, to elegantly degolla and beheading critics while quote Shakespeare, already worth. The phrase: "the critics usually have enemies, Inspector." We say that they are part of the craft |
2,818 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/978 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | Eragon | 1 | 5 | muchocine | The problem of Eragon is not Narnia, which seeks repeated comparison: is the Lord of the rings. Popcorn, dragons and franchises... | The problem of Eragon is not Narnia, which seeks repeated comparison: is the Lord of the rings. Case that this trilogy by Peter Jackson did not exist, Eragon would be an absolute Epiphany for the calenturienta, by fantastic, mind of a teenage fact to take hours to well-nourished pages books and to lose in mythologies of Elves, elves, magic and dragons. As the machinery of Hollywood is relentless, we have to impose on Eragon several corrective actions even though none of them the film get demolished in excess.The stone found in the forest by a young and then it be egg of a prophetic Dragon under whose nose chisperreante hides the destiny of a people subjected by a despotic and barbaric King is the foundation stone of the magic of all the tales of magical kingdoms and Heroes which is deposited, in a sort of arcane, the future of the justice or the happiness of a people.All this explicit with ease in the film, but the problem is that we have already seen arguments so similar and narrated with equal or better fortune than this, for late, is irrelevant.This family film of popcorn and discreet amazement not spare. What is more: should be hosted, powered, become common currency for American producers giving green light to these taquillazos, meagre occasionally in quality, but sweeping suggestions and amenity. There are already so few films really worthy for whole family feels in the seven row and gets carried away by the magic of the big room (now leave the well-trodden argument of the desirability of the domestic film) are grateful for all that den. This rudimentary, flat and populist film is born a spectator, now young, who then paladeará other works. This is the end of my criticism. Out of that connection, Eragon is one franchise film again, Christmas, spurred by a book by massive sales and driven with ex officio, but without charm, a director once expert in special effects (Terminator 2, Master and commander, the perfect storm, save the soldier Ryan) and that here complies, without more. It is not possible, proverbs popular ask pears at del olmo said. Above, this is a very simple pear.The epic that require these stories is burdened by some short-sightedness in the scenarios, although shine (and how) in the majestic flight of the Dragon and in the final battle, which is very successful. The actors, better not speak. Jeremy Irons, curiously based in the world of the dragonería (dragons and dungeons, verbigratia), makes as it involves in its work of the young apprentice of Salvador guru, but he notices lost in a role that won't you and that does not give any actor with character mark, that is, limited to overact, providing too seen tics and gestures very greedy old Wolf in sheep (paste) to bite his already learned tooth.Robert Carlyle is a shadow, a villain of órdago, adlátere, however, the demon king and reason for all the fuss fantastic, a John Malkovich that leaves little and which, apparently, seems to saved for a sequel (Eldest). The third (Empire) this geniecito cuasiadolescente still (Christopher Paolini) that has managed to shadow his Tolkien amadio and rethink what to deliver to the youth audience, is already said, Avid these candy medievalists, pure entertainment. And will also soon make dolls and plastic dragons to fill the shelves of Toys ' r Us of half the world and the McDonalds of the other means. They are very clever todos.p.d.: my daughter, who has read the billet was defrauded, in the bottom of his heart. You had esquimlado average book. Or more. Or everything. Anyway...I return to that matter, in any case: family film. How nice. |
2,819 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/604 | Ivan Sainz-Pardo | The host | 2 | 5 | muchocine | With a recital of clichés in this manner he garnished us Korean time and average remaining where boredom will be the protagonist of a stretched, languid, disjointed, chaotic footage. | Encouraged by a brazen and provocative trailer where a beast of a river tilting slow motion against the surprised citizens, I went to see this movie in Sitges, where also its director introduced announcing that the sound effects would not us us to sleep while this began at eleven in the evening of a Sunday her.Best thing about the movie is its initial part and see how it goes straight to the point. A very bad doctor, the only American who appears in the film, of course, ordered to throw a few chemicals down the drain in his laboratory. Six years later there is a monster sunbathing in the adjacent River. It is not original at all, but no matter. People discover what scuba diving and the beast comes out to play with the people to the "you her wearing". The monster campa to full light of day and we can see and enjoy its physiognomy and their skills superbly thanks to some effects made these Yes, in Hollywood. Images of the beast, generated by computer, during the first 20 minutes are absolutely sweeping. Clear, and I while I wondered there sitting in the cinema. If in twenty minutes it has taught me this Korean everything that a movie of this kind usually me give in all their footage complete, what I will teach now? Well then, we discovered that the protagonist is a regrettable Muttley and we were stunned when the beast abducts his daughter and then leave the family to complete (up to the abuelito), to look for her. Thus, as if they were hiking to the pine forest. The mix of genres is something dangerous and if humor is East because the contest is even more complicated. Imagine that a monster kidnaps the son of Aida, the series, and from there we see like her, accompanied by his entire family of Yahoos go to rescue him. Because it would be a comedy with Monster. A comic horror movie. Now imagine that the family of losers and jokes are Korean and that the best of the Fireworks is when the grandfather says that you can identify the State of mind of his son when this pulls a fart in the caravan. So if they are going to see this movie already shall not imaginations. Many people laughed at in the room for funny things in the movie that more are good only for our Western minds and that they actually have to do with how to act, react or strange traditions and Oriental rituals. I remembered that cinema session a few years ago, with the room full of teenagers from the box to laugh with the remastered version of "The Exorcist". A movie which made cry of fear of entire generations, now had become a comedy for teenagers that could not drop the laugh, for example, before the ridiculous pints and connaisseurs hairstyles of the actors.Returning to "The Host", soon they teach us that the sister of the abducted girl is Olympic Sharpshooter of arc and that sadly only get the bronze. And we then know who you trigger the monster final arrow to try to win the gold. With a recital of clichés in this manner he garnished us Korean time and average remaining where boredom will be the protagonist of a stretched, languid, disjointed, chaotic footage.I could give some to another cabezada despite sound effects. The movie lasts two hours and to tell the truth, perhaps with that fabulous trailer would have left. |
2,820 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3492 | Ramón Balcells | Conversaciones con mi jardinero | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Clever, original or eccentric; It is, simply, a film for a Sunday afternoon. | Over the past years, French cinema has been something similar to thematic stagnation. Have someone not has felt the same thing to see several French films of the 21st century? Except that coral and magnificent Paris, je t'aime, each and every one of the films of French-speaking are truly identical. Friendship, painting, marriage and sex. They really have nothing more than? Appears that no, and shows it well the endearing but topical until more power not conversations with my gardener. Already good start, one known as continue and will conclude the story, but the worst is that it holds under a really simple, not to say weak script. It is altogether another correct sample of the previous themes told in a manner endearing and sympathetic, but finally falls, for the umpteenth time, in one of the predilections of French filmmakers: the death. And sorry to reveal some portion of the end, but you have previously supposed. Obviously first and foremost, she is friendly with all, it is not passed from the grated, is all a kind of metaphor told without claw, but with some grace. The chemistry between Autieuil and Darrousin is interesting, because both feel that estrangement that has marked and at the same time a sort of proximity required by the two childhood friends. Their relationship could be considered a friend of mutual aid. Both one and other have a correct interpretations, the first onsiderándose the Actor Galo.Conversaciones with my gardener is one of those French movies of the heap, who come to tell us always the same but with an intimate air which makes them pleasant to see. Clever, original or eccentric; It is, simply, a film for a Sunday afternoon. |
2,821 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3251 | Estesoyo | El Orfanato | 1 | 5 | muchocine | I am even the eggs of films that just wrong because there is no talent to come up with a final in conditions. And I am even the eggs of the critics of bogus, that in your fucking life have been a horror film, and exalt this mierdecilla as if it were to be a new classic. | The orphanage is a Spanish film of terror haunted house. That Yes, despite having a virtually Hispanic cast in its entirety, the story he tells is very American, imitating the style of scares based on raising the volume of the special effects as needed. As a friend of mine would say: the same shit with different packaging.Said the director, Juan Antonio Bayona, who alucinaba with the response media that he had had with his first job. And it is that it is not for less. To my also seems to me amazing exaggerated support which has had in the media. Newspapers and televisions that treated as junk (recognize that often well-deserved form) to the genre of horror and fantasy, have drooled exalted from this minor story, that will not go to the history of the cinema, or in general nor the Spanish.And it is that we are facing a haunted house story. that I have already seen a million times. Damn, is not even particularly well shot. It works well as a low-budget experiment, or it would work better in short format, but her she shits as feature film. The story is 100% predictable and scares us is giving are classics of the monster series-b: covered by a mask and don't stop tell us how horrible that is and above all, raise the volume of the music at the moment Summit. And this not already strained. I put zeros to films with more tradition than this (and were well well-deserved eh?).In the end. Once again, cheated, I went to cinema hoping to find the classic breath of fresh air, a low budget but sincere and original work, an attractive history and absorbent. well not. The same shit. 'The sixth sense' is certainly the film has done more damage to the horror genre. I am even the eggs of ghost stories mixed with human and that in the end everyone is dead. I am even the eggs of films that just wrong because there is no talent to come up with a final in conditions. And I am even the eggs of the critics of bogus, that in your fucking life have been a horror film, and exalt this mierdecilla as if it were to be a new classic. Damn, if only a classic every 5 years, and that if we are lucky.People go out of the film saying, ' damn, that fear have spent '. And I say: do fear? when? When get you hit an aunt with the shattered face, when they close the doors at once or when the aunt gives back, raise the volume and sees a child?. But Uncle, that this I've seen already thousand times. At the end of the movie I thought. they have not yet released the basement. and indeed, they draw. Just need a bit of country music to have it all.The story goes an orphanage (obviously) who is going to take a couple. The girl (Belen Rueda, another drama more behind him) lived there small and wants to return to care for children with problems. Then we know that there are ghosts, the son of the couple can see them and as always (bufff) parents do not believe you and think they are the typical invisible friends. Parents seeking disappears right away the child and empienza. The mother investigates and learns that he had a deformed child who died in a joke of other children. The mother of the deformed child poisoned the rest and was mounted so the curse of the House. All die in the end, the child of Belen Rueda is that it was in the basement dead (it had fallen without further) and mother commits suicide to be with the fantasmitas. Therefore all this counted with large ups and downs in the volume of the music and with fairly little skill by the director, which skips several narrative stages of history, doing that in the end it does not end curdling the truño. There is an obsession with constant to the spectator, which ends with the respectable sending shit to the aforementioned director scares. Then, the roll of. that ugly I am. I'll teach my face. well not her I teach you. Damn, already worth, we've seen all uncle. There are two good moments throughout the film only: when the medium tells us what has happened with the children and when is playing the mother to chocolate English with the ghosts and everytime it turns there is one more. that is achieved, but two hours of film cannot be based on a continuous shock.Actors: Belén Rueda is the personified desolation. Come on that is all fucking day desolate, sad, destroyed. the joy of the orchard. Difficult to judge the work of someone who only shows a record throughout the film. I think that it is poorly directed and that in most expert hands could have given more than Yes. To see if it stops flowing dramas a little bored, is he dies around the world.The rest simply pass through there. I have read about Geraldine Chaplin, that makes a very funny role. Hell, funny compared to the Belen Rueda, and compared with her anything does grace. Get 5 minutes and is limited to walking zombie by the House. But advantage to tell us what has happened with the children and it does is original, very well solve the scarcity of effects with an agile narrative and exciting. But go, endure the two hours just for this scene is going to be that not.As his first film, we could think to be condescending and put a good note, but not. It is now when you can and must risk. It will later be subject by a budget, producers, need a good box office, etc. But now you can be original and groundbreaking. If you don't want to or you can be the best you not spend this genus, and go to romantic movies that tend to have better criticism and acceptance. For my part: zero. |
2,822 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3578 | Mario | Beowulf | 3 | 5 | muchocine | I really think that Beowulf would have been a great film to have been shot the old way; or even an excellent movie animation if that would have been what was proposed. However the end result falls between two stools, as a kind of undead without energy or agitation. | The second film with a screenplay by the great Neil Gaiman is not standing in any comic book (although the has been based on its history) and, apparently, does not have any relationship with the world of the comic. Outstanding writer and writer seems to be opening up hollow between the Vortex Hollywood.Beowulf adapts the Anglo-Saxon epic poem of the same name. The story of the Hunter hero of monsters was carried the celluloid at least twice in recent years, with mixed results: Beowulf, the legend, infumable by-product with Christopher Lambert in front; Beowulf & Grendel, dignified and Honorable Canadian low-budget production.Taking into account that the Saxons have dominated and dominate the film business, it is strange that such an account had not been adapted emphatically until this very moment. That same due think Robert Zemeckis, who supported in a unique visual effects technique as used in his previous film, Polar express, was launched to consummate the final version of the poem, which, performed with other more traditional means, would have increased its budget in a few million.The original text, without a title until the beginning of the 19th century - when was it he would start calling Beowulf - is of importance immense for Saxon languages, comparable, for example, to representing the Cantar de mío Cid to our language.The original plot consists of three parts, the first in which Beowulf confronts the demon Grendel and the mother of this, the second fraction in which Beowulf is King, and a third and last in facing a dragon, with final outcome I daresay not now.It is here where you can see the hand of Neil Gaiman at the reins of the script. Signed to pachas with Roger Avary (notable filmmaker and screenwriter, eternally remembered for me as the pen that wrote the history of Butch, the corrupt Boxer in Pulp fiction) it seems that in the end most of the work fell to the British writer.To lock all three parts of the classical poem between himself, Gaiman invented a plot of parents children of the more accurate, not clashes at all with the end result and that fits like a glove the spirit of the legend. In the movie you can listen to as recited parts of the poem in a reliable way, as well as the songs of the Vikings, masterfully inserted.Ultimately, the strength of the tape is not but the screenplay by Gaiman, simple but powerful, legendary as well as realistic. The characters speak and act as the people of that time should do so, and the delicious monsters appearing are embedded in a formidable manner in the history.But, as there is a great small defect (there always is one) the above technique of digital animation used by the director has no force to surprise for more than 10 minutes. Beyond there, what you can see is a kind of lifeless characters that recite interesting dialogues without a shred of emotion or feeling in his words. The movements are artificial and claim to reality collapses like a House of cards after half an hour of footage. I really think that Beowulf would have been a great film to have been shot the old way; or even an excellent movie animation if that would have been what was proposed. However the end result falls between two stools, as a kind of undead without energy or agitation.In conclusion, Beowulf is one project more than interesting and entertaining, born of new technologies and crushed, in my view, also by those same. The elements of the conventional cinema work perfectly, as well exemplifies the extraordinary musical score of Alan Silvestri, and however the Mise en scène becomes often as chaotic and uncontrolled as it is only possible to reach with a computer.Please, gentlemen, stop trying to seem real that is not. |
2,823 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4161 | Patri | En el valle de Elah | 3 | 5 | muchocine | In a quiet, thoughtful tone account things truly terrible inviting us to think in a reality that frightens. | United States is a strange country where anyone can buy a gun in a supermarket, where the world is divided into "good and bad", a place where if you don't have money have no right to a doctor, a place where torture prisoners who have not even had a trial and where is killed by a lethal injection to those who had also previously killed, and this country aims to "democratize" other country called Iraq based on bombs, death and destruction.This delusional situation was born this film, based on a real event, directed and written by Paul Haggis, director of the great Crash, for which he won an oscar and screenwriter of Million Dollar Baby. Hank (Tommy Lee Jones), war veteran American, begins to investigate the disappearance of his son Mike (Jonathan Tucker), soldier in Iraq that returning to his country, is absent without permission during several days of its base. With the help of the detective Sanders (Charlize Theron) truth about the guy will be coming to light little by little.This is a fresh look at the conflict, which focuses on behaviors and disorders suffered by soldiers returning from Iraq, and is that the victims of war are not only those who die in them, the emotional damage it may suffer a person subjected to an extreme situation like that can be unpredictable and brutal, as we could with those famous images of soldiers diviertiéndose while they torturing prisoners who turned over the world.The Paul Haggis film talks about all this focus in the case of a soldier missing days after appearing killed brutally, the investigation of his death, take his father and a police to go little by little knowing the facts that ended with his life.The actors are all correct, including Susan Sarandon in her small role; the protagonist, Tommy Lee Jones, nominated for an oscar for this role, performs a restrained and realistic interpretation, it is not a role that they do look for an actor and Charlize Theron plays a police ninguneada by his classmates for being too nice, which has to prove its worth, something that will get with this case.In the Valley of Elah is a very well told film that is giving us, intelligently, small doses of information prior to getting to know all the truth that it unveiled at the end, all this in a tone quiet and thoughtful to have truly terrible things inviting us to think in a reality that scares, something that in Europe we are more accustomed in the USAwhere the truth about this conflict is hidden under a halo of patriotism and absolute selfishness.The film has many quality, and although cinematically stresses not excessively, the topic is is so important and so necessary is to mention him, which becomes an essential film. |
2,824 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1011 | Rafa Ferrer | Borat | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Although there are who brings it to the brutal humor of jackass, for me, there is more that a twist to Manolo Summers movies "Tol world is Bueno" | I was surprised with this "mockumentary", especially by their criticisms, some her KTP as an intelligent tape and humor absurdly thug, and others as a monstrosity created by this strange clown named Sacha Baron Cohen.Una view time, I more than reiterate something that I've seen, and it is that, although there are who brings it to the brutal humor of jackass, for me, there is more that a twist to Manolo Summers movies "Tol world is Bueno", where it is placed the Spaniard of a foot, the more absurd situations better.Borat, or Sacha Baron Cohen (that pal case is the same), plays with this formula over and over again, although I've read that during the filming of the same is he fooled the participants saying that was for an educational tape which would only be in some Russian regions (or Romanian, now do not remember well), is incredible to some situations if they are not preparedboth of the hotel with Borat and his crony running over there, the antiques shop, as the final part with Pamela Anderson, are little credible, if they have not been previously prepared.Tapes with rednecks, more lost than Paco Martínez Soria newcomer to Madrid, there has been and there will always be in the film, and always provoke the same feeling a mixture of ridiculous, along with tenderness, and anxiety at the same time. While it is true that "Borat" is a both who knows cause staff.Finally, a acidic critique of American society, these americanitos of a foot, are not so different from any other region of the world citizen or perhaps if? |
2,825 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2131 | Patri | Sospechosos habituales | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The script is great, all the pieces are perfectly placed in the typical movie that leaves you thinking awhile when just to check if everything fits. | Directed by Bryan Singer in 1995 it has become a cult film, as at the time it was very innovative and renewed the foundations of the genre. It is now a very interesting film with some pretty good performances, although not surprised as it did in its day, because we're too accustomed to the script turns and tricks to give us an unexpected ending.The entire film is told by the character of Kevin Spacey, a cripple who is involved in a fire in a ship which killed 27 people, a policeman played by Chazz Palminteri interrogates him to try to find out the truth. A truth that we will not know until the end, with a mysterious character named Kaiser Sozé, which will be the key to everything.Kevin Spacey makes it one of his best performances, along with Seven and American Beauty the best of his career. Others are also good, although Benicio del Toro is something artificial for my taste.The script is great, all the pieces are perfectly placed in the typical movie that leaves you thinking awhile when just to check if everything fits. If you let you carry by the story the end will surprise you. |
2,826 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1635 | Luis Zueco | Cartas desde Iwo Jima | 3 | 5 | muchocine | When premiered letters from Iwo Jima it does not disappoint. Some liked the film and others liked it because it was not part of flags of our fathers but it was different and clearly superior. A Dipticon taste of the Viewer. | To complete her diptych on the battle of Iwo Jima (February-March 1945) American director Clint Eastwood (San Francisco, 1930) decided to adapt the novel Picture letters from commander in chief, based on the letters written by Japanese general Lieutenant Tadamichi Kuribayashi, during the battle itself, as it is reflected in the film. So told, as lately it is usual, with the collaboration of Paul Haggis, which already signed the script of Million Dollar Baby or flags of our fathers.Eastwood (without forgiveness, Mystic River) is faced with this project one of the most important of his career to try to tell the story of one of the most important battles in the Pacific in World War II from two opposing points of view. While flags of our fathers represented the American vision of a few soldiers returning victorious to his country after winning the battle on the island, and are used to represent all those young people who are risking their lives for their country. This second film shows the Japanese side, and life is also young soldiers but the other side as they struggled to try to maintain the small island of Iwo Jima enemy out of reach.It is not insignificant to note that the director has taken risks to perform this kind of película-dual as if it were the two sides of a coin. The making and directing two stories, which might be very similar for the context of the battle, but each one shines in fact separately and with their own light due to their differences, is a challenge that does not carry out every day a director. And as a result the two films do not shine with the same light, nor with the same intensity, even with the same color.After the premiere of flags of our fathers, which would not lie to say that passed without penalty or glory ahead of the billboards and the eyes of the spectators, the widespread both criticism and public comment was wait to see the next stop see had more to say director. Expectations frustrated in the first film became quickly build up in front of the poster announcing for a few months letters from Iwo Jima. The proximity of the premiere of both stories was one of the keys of which the first was more or less unnoticed without criticism or public cebasen too it. Somehow the strategy worked them to the producer and the Distributor, but this also sparked more interest by the second movie.When premiered letters from Iwo Jima it does not disappoint. Some liked the film and others liked it because it was not part of flags of our fathers but it was different and clearly superior. It is history from the Japanese side, the film obviously lacked all these American and American symbols which both flood any American production where the military aspect is present. And he is appreciated. So we also have an approach to the mode and life of the Japanese army and his soldiers, and see what because we knew that they were not so different from American soldiers.Even so, Eastwood not leaves throughout the film a classicism which somehow lastra production not leaving show everything what could have been. We miss a more courageous and fresh way to deal with history. It gives the impression that the director after the completion of the first film immersed in the spirit of the same, and stayed there. With a much more interesting story with an actor starring as Ken Watanabe (the last samurai, memoirs of a Geisha), showing just a part of how much that is capable of doing, letters from Iwo Jima should have been much higher than its predecessor, and when it comes out of the film comes out with a strange taste. On the one hand that like most and which is higher than flags of our fathers, and on the other that something is missing that don't know what, it presupposes good managers and they translate into their projects.Clint Eastwood has had a fairly irregular career throughout his life. Both acting and directing. Since a few years ago are you comes considered one of the best American directors by chaining projects as well received by critics and public as Mystic River and Million Dollar Baby. However we should rethink this as categorical assertion. You have 77 years and make films aren't two sufficient arguments to say it is one of the greats. And less after the completion of his last two films, which you don't have errors in the direction (which would have been intolerable) but both are a clear "eastwood style", and do not go beyond the classicism and the theatrical.What saves letters from Iwo Jima, a part of a much more attractive and suggestive story, it seems at least one much more careful production. The possibility of filming in the island itself where he succeeded the battle, gives the project of some natural sets impossible to recreate with any site. Also the film also has very close to the black and white color treatment, perhaps to provide draft a more historical feel, that only uncheck a little when shown the flashbacks, in which the color is much more present in the images that recreate the past, on the island. Another factor which helps to create a very personal atmosphere in the film is its sound. Although the story takes place only in a small island (flashbacks aside, of course), sound and different mixes of it with music or simply the bare sound cause that the viewer feels surrounded by the island everywhere, provided the projection has a decent equipment in order to provide all the nuances that we offer through the ear. No wonder therefore that the film leaving award-winning the Academy Awards gala with the Oscar to the sound editing for (Best Sound Editing).In the film there is also a sequence (the suicide grenade) could be eliminated or at least shortened. A sequence showing so much blood and amputees members to show the horrors that produces the battle is not necessary. This is one of the examples is when a good director knows cut these images in the editing room or directly dispensed from shooting them. However keeps them Eastwood, I do not know very well what to say. Perhaps to offer some blood to persons who have paid an entry to see a war film. Even so, view Japanese soldiers during World War II kamikaze is already very light by the general public, and those scenes just help to strengthen already known.However, the film can be seen well, especially for their actors and the soundtrack, with a simple Melody with Oriental reminiscences that gets into your head as a delight for the ears. A reduction of the footage, eliminating certain scenes from the second part of the film that seem very similar and redundant as to what you want to convey, had set up a pace more harmonious to the last part of the same. Photography, art direction and music shine throughout the film, however is you miss the hand of a director with own talent that had known to give the film the magic that has but not shown. A pity. |
2,827 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4201 | Andrés Pons | Mortadelo y Filemón: Misión Salvar la Tierra | 2 | 5 | muchocine | After the enormous success of the 2003 of the irregular adaptation of the brilliant comic book created some fifty years ago by the great Ibáñez could not doubt a sequel which of course repeat step by step the foundations of the original but be changed a couple of names. | After the enormous success of the 2003 of the irregular adaptation of the brilliant comic book created some fifty years ago by the great Ibáñez could not doubt a sequel which of course repeat step by step the foundations of the original but be changed a couple of names. The head on this occasion is Miguel Bardem author of the ugliest women of the world or twelfth night that already had some similarity to a comic book by the form of their images, replaces the main player Benito Pocino which physically seemed much more in tune for the role but I guess that the much greater popularity of the neng Edu soto earned him the game. Otherwise the cast returns to also repeat the same situations in some brilliant special effects that end up getting tired by repetitive.Clearly some scenes are really funny but most GAGS are forced without at any time approaching the original spirit of the adventures on paper, something that unfortunately already could presuppose.The best returns to the talent of the Pepe Viyuela comic which creates a perfect Filemon with the perfect loser vitola, teammate I finished convincing nor here neither as a comedian. Film forced that after repeated at every shot ends up being heavy and without the necessary grace. |
2,828 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3319 | Ana Belén Pacheco | American Gangster | 3 | 5 | muchocine | A story often told but few so enthusiastically and media. A great script and lots of money to afford the best players.The main drawback is it is so accurate that it is predictable and sometimes boring. | There are many films that are made with the premise of having a good time between buddy and filmmaking of step. In this two old acquaintances: Denzel Washington (changing the role of good and evil on this occasion) and Ridley Scott (Gladiator, A good year). The trouble with these old friendships is that at times the colegueo isn't enough so that everything goes smoothly.Impeccable script about two individuals that were able to be made if same. One from the illegality and the other from an honesty that is even ridiculous. American Gangster illustrates the advent of one of the biggest drug traffickers in New York and the excessive persecution of a mediocre police to do the right thing. A story often told but few so enthusiastically and media. A great script and lots of money to afford the best actors that are placed on the skin of these two characters (which may also carry some nomination) and a handful of secondary (such as Cuba Gooding Jr. that appears when you least expect in any production) but perhaps a lack of originality, risk and rhythm. The main drawback is it is so accurate that it is predictable and sometimes boring. Part Fank Lucas goes from man of confidence and a mafioso driver to fill the gap which will leave after his death thanks to a very risky drug operation. Funny thing is that this "don't nobody" doesn't call attention to itself and its great organization and thanks to them survives with a degree of immunity even within the own corruption around him. On the other hand Richie Roberts is a somewhat clunky COP that has too many principles with their profession and too few for other things. This way when his personal life goes entirely to scuttle and his best friend of the body ends in a Bureau of forensic decides to amend the errors and hunt more drug dealer off the streets. There are two things that unite these two characters and it is precisely their ferrous ethical principles. Their fidelity and loyalty to this way of life will determine their decisions that lead to the outcome, which to my taste is quite obvious and raked but is bad of based made real, that history is marked factory. |
2,829 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/696 | Caruco | Donnie Brasco | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Does purpose of "Infiltrators", Martin Scorsese... one of the greatest successes of?Did Donnie Brasco? was offer the daily activities of each? gangsters? do devoid of everything? glamour?. | With regard to "Infiltrators" by Martin Scorsese. When it seemed that had already said the last word on the mafia, in titles such as "The godfather", "One of ours", "Death among the flowers" or "The funeral", appeared in 1997 a piece performed by Johnny Depp and Al Pacino. Its title: "Donnie Brasco".It was based on real experiences of an FBI agent, Joe Pistone infiltrated a mafia clan of New York in order to gather evidence for the detention of offenders for six years.Gray and ordinary men that could very well described as authentic currantes of the craft. They had to earn a living day to day trafficking or stealing whatever, from jewelry to a simple parking meter revenue.Joe Pistone (Johnny Depp) will not reveal the secret nor his wife. And develop a paterno-filial sincere friendship with Lefty Ruggiero (to Al Pacino), a mafioso of minor and a born loser who padrinará the young Joe in a scene, located at the other side of the law, which is not without appeal.So the protagonist end up debating between loyalty to her partner and mentor (and with the possibility that he already is also "one of their own"), and the obligation to fulfil its duty as police. A particularly important dilemma in an environment where treachery is considered a crime worse than murder.Of course, it is a delight to see together to Johnny Depp and Al Pacino, or Michael Madsen as secondary. The script must be and the intimate music composed by Patrick Doyle, perfectly defines friendship.Directed by Mike Newell (four weddings and a funeral") has a leisurely, but fast-paced rhythm and a commendable strength in some images. For example, in the initial credit titles, and with the foreground in black and white of the eyes of Joe / Johnny Depp, suggests to us that this will become an observer cold and ambiguous.And the photography, off tones, not spread from monotony sinó that helps the history to be consistent with grey characters, which can be both mediocre as unsung heroes.(Note: only as dato, in reality, Lefty, author of a score of murders, could only be accused of blackmail!, but the film book you another "final"). |
2,830 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3406 | Ana Belén Pacheco | Expiación: Más Alla de la Pasión | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Which manage to overcome his audancia in the Assembly will forgive those excesses and enjoy a very meticulous film with a flawless picture and a couple of ideas thrown in the air that work decently. | I hate when movies make me "trap" and when the montages are planned so that you see only what the director wants to give you the remaining data is one of the dirtiest things you can do in the film. That is why when you start Atonement feel that I'm going to raise the Chair with a terrible discomfort. Especially in the beginning with these continuous flashbacks, something repetitive and only seemingly dispensable managed create uneasiness that I hardly recovered in the second part of the film.I said very carefully second part as it is structured in three different temporary spaces and follows the three protagonists along his "scapegoat" journey: Briony a antojadiza and talented girl of high rank, his older sister Cecilia and her lover Robbie Turner (son of the housekeeper of keys). The story begins on the hottest day of 1935, the war I said start and the busy atmosphere, a small meeting in an impressive Palace of field serves to introduce the protagonists of this story from the outset seems dramatic and that knowing the author of the book, the British Ian McEwan, specialist in romantic fiction leaves many doubts about the content of the remaining footage. Accused of a crime he had not committed by the sister of Cecilia lover ends in jail and by the historical circumstances in the war. But I must admit that as soon as they calmed down those frantic jumps to the past to see the story from the points of view of all stakeholders and returned the coherence classic come back to get you fully in the history where all the characters seek a rematch and will be spinning the questions left unanswered in his past. Is true that the majority of the reactions are predictable but in some ways is what is expected of a dramón of epic dimensions like this.It is perhaps the turn of the third party who has left me a little indecisive when it comes to position me to this mixture of poetic narrative and well-intentioned fiction. Anyway once exceeded viewing initial many things fit, the initial reluctance disappear and you find a épico-bélico tape - pretty interesting romantic. I admit that the second time you see him you take much better the gracia.¿Es a great movie? I don't think so, it is rather accurate. If you need forty minutes to decide to accommodate you enjoy in the armchair is something goes wrong. Precisely this boldness to which I refer is so confusing that many do not give the opportunity to own film explained to likewise. In all case which if succeed in overcoming this barrier can forgive these excesses and enjoy a very meticulous film with a flawless picture and a couple of ideas thrown in the air that work decently. |
2,831 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1025 | Rafa Martín | Candida | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Fesser y Cía created a language of their own, a style that is simply unique in the world of cinema: a combination of visual extravagance which tells stories using a virtually unparalleled in the Assembly. | There is a class of films that produce me real fear. All films are trying to manipulate your emotions in a way or another, but there are some that do completely blatant way (rays, you can almost see the Director approaching with a knife): upload music, the characters cry, the boy embraces with the girl, everyone applauds bleep, spectator, you take the handkerchief and start to fill with snot, venga snot and boogers come. Included e.g. Love Actually, which she left crying, but for other reasons (basically, I felt as if he just take part in a traffic accident and I had escaped from the scene of the crime). Candida, and to start it no doubt to anyone, falls directly into this category. And I Kale movie the three minutes: I put the breastplate, I prepared to maintain an impenetrable face and even tried to force my dream mechanism, to see if it was for a couple of minutes that could be used to give me a shut-eye. I have to say that I have failed completely, my friends.For our readers abroad (any, any, I swear) that are unaware of the background of this story, saying that our protagonist, Cándida Villar, worked as a Lady of the cleaning of Guillermo and Javier Fesser, the first of which is one of the components of the radio comedians (among other things) known as foam Duo. Over time, this woman has become part of the staff of the programme making film criticism (which causes the descojone father in the public, mainly because it is unable to say a name only well and she alone is enough and enough to convert the plot of a film of Adam Sandler in a desparrame taken from the mind of David Lynch) once said: I don't care if you just return to cure genital herpes in Mozambique: has hardly been able to have worse than this lady. A drug addict son. Another son as one chota. A vástaga lost megachoni out there. He resides in a House of official protection and earn the living cleaning tour buses that teem by Madrid, discounting that cleaning of the floor of the Marquise Ms., and anything else that is out there. No matter the crooked put things, Candida always comes forward with a wisdom cachito, and another piece of tenderness of mother. It is a simple woman that works hard, who earn their bread by the sweat of their brow and who has sacrificed his entire life by his sons.Or: If you falls worse, congratulations, you're a son of a bitch.Enter wanted to embrace her.And Candida is the fundamental pillar on which structure this film, which is mostly a costumbrista painting by Madrid, which explains more or less how is the life of the good woman through isolated scenes and that gradually develops a story between the Lady and Paul, a broadcaster of television, alter ego of Fesserwhich which Uma Thurman in Beautiful Girls, will finish fixing his life and its problems of couple with his American girlfriend. Is clear that Fesser has much to tell, but neither he nor his brother had been before as concentrated on explaining a story, which greatly helps the film, most of the footage that keeps a good balance between comedy and drama, and never lose sight of the idea that is telling, that is the world of Candida, populated by which more eccentric characters (the neighbor)(, the Marquis, the goalkeeper, and the list continues until one million, more or less) and, unfortunately, more two-dimensional. The material, so good, so original, is marred occasionally by Fesser with completely unnecessary mechanisms such as this soundtrack everywhere, with cosas crammed with shoehorn (is a particular thing of mine: never put a song during the closing credits, made exception you're a Woody Allen or James Bond), because does not need it.However, what the film lost in audio wins it in video. This is the first film by Guillermo Fesser solo, but not need to be a genius to deduce that these two, as the Coens, working as one and I trill, forming the filmmaker visually more exciting in Spain (and I don't think there is many doubts on this point in question). Almodóvar gives a personal vision of the world, but Fesser y Cía created a language of their own, a style that is simply unique in the world of cinema: a combination of visual extravagance which tells stories using a virtually unparalleled in the Assembly and which are multiple tributes with wide-angle cañí Spain, the boom of the 1960s and lifelong neighborhood cinema. These guys backward-looking, but do so without anger, and when Candida is expressed in a moment in the film how nice it is Madrid, we cannot but agree. Because the film expresses alone.And given that Candida Candida plays, and that doesn't or Meryl Streep, well say that Ms. Villar nail the role itself. It wasn't very difficult at the end and all. The same desparpajo showing on the radio appears to the same extent in front of the camera. While I do not stop do not bloody grace the "candidismos", it is the way of being of this woman and their value system that me ends up winning. Failure of the movie is to be about to become a parody of chacha of cleansing, something that is about to fall in many moments, especially when the good woman confused words (and which leads to the laughter of the public, including some academic Emeritus sovereigns of the Spanish language) and Fesser is dedicated to exploit the phenomenon in every fucking line of dialogue to Candida. Works only once: at the time of the monologue (impressive: throughout the film pales in comparison) and is, in my opinion, one of the highlights of the Spanish film of this season and other many. Comes so natural and is so devastating, that Jorge Bosch, which throughout the film has been wandering with a rather poor role, descojona from within, gets to cry, becomes to laugh and finishes making the contraplanos of his life.Solving life to others.As for the rest of the actors, the truth is quite well, especially Raúl Peña (which most goes, on the other hand), in the role of son yonkarra. The case is. actually I imported an egg what should happen. What I care is how reacts Candida, the only personaje-personaje of the film, and a center of gravity in lathe which move minor roles. In any case, for me it is enough: I paid to see this good woman and the Lady meets far and the rest, well look, also. Then it all depends on how picky you are and as you have reacted to the flagrant manipulation (understood as "I'm going to grab by the neck until you cry") Fesser: If the film has not you come, the climax on the set of television you may seem completely ridiculous (if it has fact. get ready because you will cry egg and a half) and the epilogue in United States can be like the end of the Lord of the rings. In any case, repeat: let yourself go. It is a journey that is worth the trouble. |
2,832 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1951 | Daniel Galindo | Tuya Siempre | 2 | 5 | muchocine | The director of in arms of mature women becomes Flora Martínez one of its tourist cicerones: delving into the lower depths of the city and see what does not appear in travel guides. | If there is a classification of film by colors, this film would have a greyish tone, intense Mallard and very close to the black brown tones. Chromatic curiosities to one side, yours is always an example of film noir whose employers have been reviewed by an interesting filmmaker by bold, a priori.Correct thriller with a right and social conscience is the portrait of this another Barcelona, away from the stately neighborhoods, tourist and safe from the modernist air centers and modernilla whirlwind. The scenario where there are two outcasts (played by Martinez and Ruben Ochandiano) serves as a meeting point for beings that hold dangerous balance, always with the threat of falling into the void.Well outlined the players, remained to define (s) plot (s) and it is here where weakens this tape, which suffers the excesses of a somewhat unbalanced pace and the idea of puzzle in the Assembly. This new vision of the 'other side', portrayed through an accurate setting, a prominent musical support and a very correct picture of teacher José Luis Alcaine is still very interesting. Where also confirms Lombardero is in the direction of actors: Nancho Novo takes two of two very soon, because we don't forget Pudor.Es one of these unfortunate beings that populate these islands dominated by drug dealers, prostitutes, gangsters of little rides but able to do much damage and criminals with dreams. There is the need to distinguish between good and bad: all have reason to be there and do what they do. Without wishing to influence their judgement and despite the fact that these pieces of non-life are left to see, Manuel Lombardero could have driving the tooth with more force. But maybe, that of not doing too much blood. |
2,833 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4205 | Javier G. Pasamón | Hacia rutas salvajes | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Although they apasionen me this kind of stories and films, it does not remove Penn to go in search of an exorbitant bombast using your camera getting create an underlined and unnecessary entromisión with the filmed reality. | One, after viewing the last film of Sean Penn, inevitably comes to the memory a sympathetic and, in general, unknown film of James B. Clark, entitled by these lares "the boy and his mountain" (1969), based on the work of Jean Craighead George (1), which was of a boy who runs away from the wealthy life known to spend a summer (and any) to another station in the mountains living what the nature given, accompanied by the Thoreau master literature and getting through food algae care and hunting provided by the good do their Peregrine Falcon. "Wild routes" would be the older sister (and serious) "A boy in the mountains", because while in the B. Clark film, there was some pretentiousness (if everything a little Disney and sweetened), the tape of Penn, there is a certain excess, and not just of footage.We might well say that Penn makes the same mistake, although not at equal level, as his good friend Mexican Alejandro González Iñarritu "we love so much" on this website: the search for an exorbitant bombast using your camera getting create an underlined and unnecessary entromisión with the filmed reality.There is a clear willingness to interfere visually to the spot. And Penn, to tell us the story (and be noted as a filmmaker) interferes in the formal section with mechanisms of dubious taste and effectiveness as the abuse of air, rotational levels (around a topic in this kind of stories) and slow motion. However, the use of split screens is right for me, not so the letters on screen that they disfigure the set and assume a little subtle mechanism to describe it's a newspaper.As in "Babel" of our "esteemed" Iñarritu, Penn seeks impossible postcards, films the sky, look rebuscadísimos levels and ultimately seems to try to say: "Hey, look at how good I am!" or something like "I am indie and cool me be it", but unlike the multilingual tape of the Mexican, in this if there is a sense to show landscapes and its spectacularthat is to say, that something less than it because if you have the man, because nature is one character.Of course, Penn has not had the subtlety that is Malick on how show nature.Another negative aspect - very in fashion today - and that he shared, unfortunately with the works of Iñarritu, is unjustified acronológico Assembly, because the novel is completely linear.As an adaptation of the novel by Krakahuer, say that it is quite acceptable and decent, in addition to faithful. Although, for a server, the most notable of the tape are the remarkable photography of Eric Gautier, usual first operator of Olivier Assayas, the exceptional soundtrack of Eddie Vedder of the Pearl Jam and notable interpretations of Emile Hirsch, which carries the entire weight of the film, and Hal Holbrook, with a brief but memorable contribution.Although "towards"wild routes contain elections in film that I have not just convinced, personally, and for reasons beyond reason, I love the road-movies of lonely characters with a self-improvement and challenges, and it not going to be less. And is that the film of Penn has an end of a beauty and so heartbreaking message as true. Life is unpredictable, all survival requires preparation and prior in-depth study (which the protagonist clearly lacked her), but above all, and most importantly, is there need to accept yourself as who is. His ideals were exciting and exciting, but utopian. At least he had courage to prove it.But although they apasionen me this kind of stories and films, does not detract from what was said already above, Penn goes to the search for an exorbitant bombast using your camera getting create an underlined and unnecessary entromisión with the filmed reality, and that removes many integers to the film.(1) Author who not only wrote the novel that would give rise to "the boy and his mountain" entitled "My side of the mountain", but also a kind of second part called "On the Far Side of the Mountain", not adapted for film. |
2,834 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1014 | Caruco | Mentes en blanco | 3 | 5 | muchocine | It is not a particularly memorable movie, but can be seen, especially by the curious surprise at the end. | Don't want to reveal too on the intricacies of "Unknown", a film that articulates its intrigue and the surprise outcome. In addition to making us wait until the last scene, almost until his last seconds, to give us other information to give a surprise turn of the screw to that seen until then.It is also the directorial debut of the Colombian Simon Brand, man hardened above all in the advertising world, in ads for Pepsi, Coca Cola or BMW; and in the music videos for singers like Enrique Iglesias, Britney Spears or Shakira. Which earned him that "Variety" magazine included as one of "40 most influential latinos in Hollywood".Although its realization is the opposite of what is espararía him, a dazzling and originalilla way to sell us the content, but also which is a sunset in grey, purely functional scene and it would seem that modest and subject to interpretations and the script, skillful, Matthew Waynee, also rookie.Making friends.The plot excuse places us in a warehouse and with five men stunned, tied or injured who have lost the memory because of an accident with chemicals deposited in the enclosure. As they recover the knowledge they should do the same with memory because they deducted that some of them are victims and the other hijackers.The grace is go making cabals on who one is, with the aggravating circumstance that nobody can trust no one: the abductees must fear for his life; and the hijackers to possible foreign aid in the form of agents of law and order.Among them was génera a logical distrust, but also the need to ally themselves to escape from this impasse, or rather, locked storage. While abroad, a couple of colleagues hijackers has been to collect the booty, followed closely by the police, as well as a woman who suffers, Eliza (Bridget Moynahan), well one of the retained is her husband.Best from home.So to expect the moment that everything come and the puzzle, with multiple tracks, some format? flash-back? (to return the memories), will acquire consistency.Freed from the nails of the passion of Christ, among its protagonists highlights Jim Caviezel, nicknamed "denim jacket" by his manner of dress, and which stands immediately in the leader of the group. Also a Greg Kinnear, who is impossible to see him as a "bad boy" and Barry Pepper, recent even his interpretración in "The three burials of MILTIADES Estrada" with Tommy Lee Jones.A part of the urgency of the characters in go regaining its identity, it is not "Unknown" is an especially memorable film. But it can be seen, especially by the curiosity of its surprise ending, but my advice is to not be be specially intrigue with icing lover, perhaps best that they see comfortably from home, when you arrive on DVD. |
2,835 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3469 | Tito Chinchan | El vengador tóxico | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Film about a boy that mutates in a toxic Avenger devoted to exterminate all criminals of his people. Comic Gore with sexual dose became a cult film. If you want to see one of the genus, which is this. | Director: Michael Herz and Lloyd KaufmanDuración: Na, or 80 minutes.Release date: 1985, in the ass the hinco you (is to follow with the tone of the film).In pornographic films we can find several ways of doing so. On one hand, pneumatic women of impossible curves and fleshy lips (both) that they trajinan as if a studied ballet, developed gentlemen were hyper with less hair than a frog and phalluses of apocalyptic dimensions. Course, that porn is somewhat distant from the viewer average (and the integer also), that often go for productions less professionals, with real characters, such as which is on the other side of the screen with the pants to half leg. Why am I telling all this stuff? In the "gore" film we can find with the same. Incisions and cuts of movies as Hostel or Saw end up bored to the Viewer, tired of so much perfection, and it makes producers such as Troma his hole with products like that today bring it.The film is an alelado kid who works at a gym of a city called Tromaville. All they get with him, and him they putean, to such an extent that a bad day ends falling into a bucket of acid which coincidentally was at the door of the gym. Following this, his body transforms in a super hero who is responsible for ending the more than excessive crime in the city.Let's see, the film is very bad die, for starters. But what it makes a cult film that put on the map to the productoria Troma? Well, this film marks a line of genre comedy - gore - grumosilla that must have spectators by noses. The dialogues, taken out of context are tremendous, but stuck in context are even worse. The storyline is the worst of the worst, but engages in a bad way to go see how to deal with the Avenger of each one of the bad guys. The gore scenes are pretty good with cheap effects that give the pego. One thing, not cut with nothing, there is nothing of respect for anything and you can find anything. Also have nude unnecessary, so you need something else to see?In short, movie about a guy that mutates in a toxic Avenger devoted to exterminate more brutally all criminals of his people. Comic Gore with sexual dose became a cult film. If you want to see one of the genus, which is this.Over the years keeps it just as bad, but endearing.Besitos.P.D: Scenes like the cieguita reading the hand to the monster are priceless.Pd2: Detail of the MOP seems very good. |
2,836 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2347 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | Todo lo demás | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Woody Allen is the master of ephemeral lovers on screen. About love and sex, about the intimate drama of these two drives, it raises one acid and only farcical function. Here stays in half-measures, but above the usual average in many other directors like comedies. | Woody Allen is an author of easily exhaustible narrative. Anyone lampamos by celebrate the liturgy of their releases know their material shines rare novelties and the charm lies in the variations on this seemingly narrow inventory exercises the dazzling talent of his genius. Everything else is a new necklace for the same dog, but ladra with new ringers: the couple in crisis, sex as any epic tap, the paranoia of the Jewish conspiracy, humor as livelihood or the psychoanalyst laconic and soon resolved. Tireless, Allen is not moved from his favorite props, Manhattan, and nor relinquish filter his socarronería, his skepticism, his increasingly evident love for the difficult emotional balance that we have humans to go us living in this world rogue. His puzzle of characters is always beautiful, heroic, amplified or minimized according to the tragic or comedic records of his scripts, gadgets of a verbal incontinence test of bored spectators, a huge puzzle of interchangeable parts, tensile and destensadas, amplified or minimized to desirability of the oral epic of his characters.Here an aspiring writer, neurotic, tormented by a poor sex life, meets a girl from proven, dysfunctional promiscuity, nymphomaniac at times, very innocent in the background. Jason Biggs and Christina Ricci embroider his excessive roles while Allen reserves the candy of a formidable character: the sentimental guru traumatized by the fragility of his placid life and fascinated by weapons, likely a post 11-s stress echo, a species of domestic, intimate, immediate emotional adhesions, reasonably hysterical Hero (is Allen) and benefactor of impossible causesand the improbable loves suburban philanthropy. Everything else continues to be a revamped version of Annie Hall that drama-free.It also husbands and women or Manhattan. For the viewer who knows from hearsay of Woody Allen filmography, there is here a natural, affordable, baptism makes no fanfare of the usual neuro of genius, but that drops them, soft, constructing a recitative of memorable phrases, an academic compendium of their topics and, above all, an exercise in moderation waiting to deal with projects of over rising bad milk. |
2,837 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2320 | Red Stovall | Historia de un crimen | 4 | 5 | muchocine | A very good movie that does not deserve the little dissemination that is taking. Plugin if you want to see it, because I don't think it lasts in billboard long, especially now that approaching more summer blockbusters. | Compare?History of a crime? with?Truman Capote? It is something totally inevitable, as are two projects that were on par, and the two are about the same: the facts that led to Capote to write?-In cold blood?. Even so, why one of these films garnered critical success more important nominations to the Oscars with a well-deserved award for Philip Seymour Hoffman and the other delayed its release, occur almost of surreptitiously, is something which is beyond my understanding. Because?History of a crime? (do ridiculous translation/dubbing of the original:?)(Infamous?) It is superior in many respects to the film by Bennett Miller, that being good, it was a little cold.The argument leads us to see how Truman Capote in full swing of his career, decides to investigate a murder in a small American people, focusing on the consequences that the horrific crime took to the small community, and write everything in a newspaper article. The capture of the assassins, and the possibility that Capote can interview them, led him to decide that he should write a book. Does this book became one of the novels most important and influential of the 20th century, making immortal Capote.?History of a crime? much warmer is that?Truman Capote?, making the central character much closer to the Viewer, to the extent that this greatly sympathizes with him. In this regard, it is cited two elements really prodigious. One is the excellent interpretation of Toby Jones, who it was easier than Hoffman, physically looks more, but just as one is superb, and although it may seem otherwise, it never falls in excess or the histrionics, composing a character full of nuances, and which easily goes from funny thing to moving with astonishing ease. The second element is the humour that pervades throughout the film, in which reference is made to the sexuality of Capote. A humor cleverly inserted into the plot, which never falls in the helpings and it is made with utmost respect, it helps integrate further into history, which quickly become hard to difficult to endure limits in addition to the Viewer. And anyone who has seen the impressive Richard Brooks film?-In cold blood?, know what I mean. Indeed, the comparison with the legendary Brooks film is also inevitable.The film boasts an art direction really exemplary, and a totally accurate vision of American life in the 1950s, with all these parties that were in the houses, in which someone used to be the center of attention. Sensational sequence in which Capote wins the confidence of the people in these parties telling their stories in the world of the celluloid with people like Bogart, Sinatra, Jones or Huston. Detail this is not placed in the story only because Yes, but it is very correctly used to explain other things very well, for example the beginning of Capote relationship with one of the murderers, Perry Smith.A despite the film focuses on the years that capote led him to write?-In cold blood?, we can say that it covers more aspects of his personality, thanks to the shown moments as if it were a documentary about his life, in which several of his friends speak of him, scenes these that could be considered a stumbling block in the narrative, but I personally see very successful that help to understand the character. The same could be said of the relationship established between Capote and Harper Lee (does the writer of?)(Do kill a Mockingbird?), and Capote with Perry Smith. Both are very well displayed and described. The first surprises an extraordinary Sandra Bullock, Yes, Yes, I said extraordinary, highlighting especially in those scenes in the key of documentary. And in the second, which is probably the best of the film: an impressive Daniel Craig coming out here a little makeup. Incredible instant in which interprets a song while he plays the guitar.The rest of important players is totally anecdotal, except Jeff Daniels that plays the policeman who took the case, and also forged a curious friendship with the writer. But both Sigourney Weaver and Isabella Rossellini as Peter Bogdanovich have short interventions. Even the case of Gwyneth Paltrow is still more curious, that only comes out in the credit titles initial, performing a song, time it in which case something unpredictable, unexpected, sensational and unique. A small magical moment that manages to excite as few and that for a server is already one of their favorite moments of the past few years, and which is also cleverly used to learn a little bit more to Capote, while captures the attention of the viewer hooked him until the end.A very good movie that does not deserve the little dissemination that is taking. Plugin if you want to see it, because I don't think it lasts in billboard long, especially now that approaching more summer blockbusters. |
2,838 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/844 | Elena Suárez | Casino Royale | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Daniel Graig presents a much more human, sensitive, imperfect Bond, and why not say it, much more handsome and statuesque. | Fortunately, times have changed for up to one of the most casposos agents the film, Agent 007. That of being sexist, rude and insensitive never liked women (though foul and illegal AXE campaigns creatives still believe him).Lucky cease in his role as 007 Brosnan helped the actor show another type of facets (Matador, 2005) and producer making a 180 degree turn on the image of the secret agent who, on this occasion, we will know from their origins.Daniel Graig presents a much more human, sensitive, imperfect Bond and why not say it, much more handsome and statuesque (making silence those mouths that quickly criticized him). But not only the male protagonist has changed in this new installment, as the female protagonist (Eva Green) no longer be displays submissive and hypnotized in the presence of the "super macho" 007. She is beautiful and intelligent but does not make his body a profession and prefers to reserve for his private life.The film, based on the homonymous work of Ian Fleming, account with great action scenes, made impressive decorated underpinning a dynamic plot that, occasionally, is you could reprimand some gaps that may mislead the Viewer (do not know with certainty how many days takes the game in the casino, at the airport is not shown clearly when Bond leaves his gun so that it sounds not the metal detector)(, etc.) However, these details cloud not the intensity and quality of the film that, mostly, they do not provide vital information for the development of the plot.Worth seeing the film for several reasons: is a good history of action we will entertain, we can see the evolution that suffers from a classic film character (though curiously this was the first novel), and we also welcome sight during more than two hours. Incidentally, this time them will not be who emerge from the sea, it will be (and you did not disappoint, promised). |
2,839 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1366 | Yojimbo | Sin city | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The bells that have repicado excited about this film are passed a tad. | The vaunted film of Robert Rodriguez and Frank Miller, creator of the comic strip, fulfils its promises (justitas). Well, technically very well, but I was expecting more spectacular in the use of his aesthetics of black and white and some chromatic "intrusions". I do not know the comic, but all those who have read say it is nailed. And in the magazines do not stop to compare ourselves some of the vignettes with stills from the film.As well, perfect. That (the simplest mimic taking to the creator of the comic as co-director) succeed with distinction. By what I have understood, each comic contained independent stories. And that remained it in the film (3 chapters) except for certain characters that match at certain times. All are interesting and curious, deliver a lot of if and the stories could become great stories if they extended more, but have been able to give sufficient to "mini stories" as to leave us satisfied the length and pace.But precisely this subdivision of 3 chapters makes the film look as a collection of shorts with points in common. Best of the film is that it does not lack know the comic to enjoy his universe. The stories are quite sordid, violent and cruel, I imagine that as had devised them Miller. The Gallery of characters and actors marching through the film is impressive and are welcome to see faces known to participate in this project.But all the bells that have repicado excited about this film are a tad. It is a great as both Rodriguez, a point of inflection in which has not made a sequel to El Mariachi or Spy Kids, and that is to be welcomed.And by the way, the way in which his work is reflected in the initial titles is clear "shot and cut by"? generic but very descriptive? |
2,840 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2771 | Tyler | Noviembre | 1 | 5 | muchocine | A movie boring and irritating spirit. After an entertaining movie 'The ball', we got this stupidity of inaguantables Brats. | John Ford has already said in this list of 10 rules to follow a strictly when making a movie. And it goes to mass. On that list was repeated the same sentence 10 times "not boring". As well, in this film Achero Mañas fails it, because it is a fairly large suckling pig. The movie is based on a funny idea, a sort of pseudo mockumentary, which mixes alleged statements by the theatre group which speaks in constructed history as fiction, with this part, the same fiction itself. We can see as members of the group theatre had their experiences to camera and then see the normal history.To begin with, in terms of content, the movie is quite irritating, put on display to a collection of stupid Brats ranging from artists with a neo roll completely unbearable hipiesco. This type of alternative urban tribe that exists now that ranging from Liberals and compare themselves with the youth of May 1968, without having any fucking idea that balls are talking. All very "cool", all in the cespecito of a park sharing a PORRET with a guitar, talking about that art is something that should be completely free. Please. more child impossible. Easy is to brand someone tell what I say of facha, but nothing from reality, the last thing I am is a facade, but I do not like anything false which are this type of young people. All go Communist rojetes with their t-shirts of Che and his red stars, without knowing that red star is the one that wore Mao, a genocidal as big or bigger than Hitler himself. It is an esbastica.The movie is more irritating for your content that by their structure or rhythm, which is quite slow because the director just do not know at what point to statements and at what point to the part of fiction; and that makes the movie Miss much pace, and do not know clearly where is the approach, where development and where the conclusion.The message of the movie esque art should be totally free, that anything can be and that you can not set limits. Art needs limits, need them, to technical and structural level but not at the level of content. I mean that a movie, for example, cannot have the structure as one you want. There are rules that must be met, and this is the case. Oscar Jaenada seems as bad as overrated actor, all equal, what makes the same expressions with the same face. A character that no one believes that you fall badly cn his roll "cool alternative". Anarchist youth go without having any idea of who is Bakunin.Si you want to see a film with a message really strong and anarquico, have to see this wonder elevated to the cube that is EL CLUB DE LA LUCHA, a movie telling the truth about humans and our nature.The tiny group of this cool, not to make representations on the street, all painted and making the parguela; except for a representation in which he faked an ETA attack, the rest doesn't interest one. The representation of the murder of ETA is the only interesting because the only provica is a real reaction of the environment, others just create anything important reactions, which do not create plot. A distorted murder creates an interesting reaction which Mañas wasted because not queire develop and again the same thing of all. freedom of creation and bla bla blaUna movie I do not recommend by that bore more than anything, and because you get nervous these characters so irritating.This neo-hipis generaciño do not know what was May 1968, can compare with them not wanting to be like them. These people was as well at the moment, today in da there is no Viet Nam, you can't have hipis. hipis is not therefore the hipis or have died or are old. And this wonderful movement made is unique, they not imitabn anyone, they just reacted. Nowadays it is easy to be so, in the comfort of the modern world. We cannot be as them, and the people that mimics are false, and those who compare worse. In addition. This ´poca us haregalado the best music in history.Habalndo film and after this pollez which I have released and sounds the host of pretentious, say that it is a film has no pace, and that does not seem to have conclusion, only a lot of scenes together without any narrative sense. |
2,841 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1097 | José A. Peig | Banderas de nuestros padres | 4 | 5 | muchocine | It has everything to be misunderstood and also has everything to be a great movie. It has its flaws and may not be a round work. Above all, a classic delicacy, an honest and beautiful film. | Go film friend Clint Eastwood, one of the few and best classical announcers we are, heir of John Ford and rich baggage accumulated over decades of cinematic craftsmanship has gone. Just like Spielberg but, if anything, more brainy and forceful in addressing the major issues or North American genera. Spielberg is a master of the show in the different areas, either in a war melodrama (soldier Ryan) in a fantastic fable ("E.T"). Eastwood, moreover, is a much more mature intellectual.Go film, he said, because it tells a story which, I am afraid, bored and leave indifferent to most of the public. We are faced with a personal whim of the author, a film that have existed almost nobody would lay in lack. We are before the typical film that makes a filmmaker who already nothing cares, except his identity as the author who is involved in the history and society of his time and his ability to express whatever he pleases.The story is not original, the style is unmistakable. I.e., although it treads ground hipermegatrillado, Eastwood makes this sensitive and evocative tribute to the "Heroes" of the second World War (in reality, human beings of the myths of the war victims) one of his most personal films, endorses this story based on an exquisite taste for narrating and make us reflect on issues concerning the feeling and the collective symbols of an eraof which it becomes the identity and current pride of American society. On the one hand, in the other channel returns to delve into the horror of the war, and here the novelty comes from the hand of a montage that takes us to a journey in circle from the most elementary facts until a final moral quite predictable, but by no means stops working. Veamos.no is a war film, is an intimate look that emphasizes the collective pain of the men and women who participated in the war and suffered its consequences directly or indirectly. And above all it emphasizes the importance of the patriotic symbols of collective representations that are the fruit of a hope or a need to justify as a hegemonic nation.But do not fall into the same error: "Flags of our fathers" is not a film patriotic or nativist. If someone doubt you, consult the dictionary to see what meaning has the word "pamphlet". We have already said that symbols and patriotic imagery are the true protagonists of the last film of Eastwood, but are not used as an instrument of propaganda, but that serve as key pieces to develop a very concrete idea, idea that comes with a considerable burden sharp and provocative.The film does not walk with contemplations and shows us the need for myths and heroes in war times. The need to identify with a flag, with an army representative and defender of the ideals system of life, to reaffirm with a uniform and democracy acts by a group of boys who, much to his regret, makes them prisoners of this network of myths and symbols. Victims, nothing less, the screeching, despair, manipulation and the hypocrisy of society which lost to his friends on the battlefield, what really mattered to them. It is particularly dramatic for the Indian character, for who his involuntary heroic corset will be the total loss of identity and meaning to their lives, grabbing ultimately to the proclamation of the truth, the true heroes that nobody has known know or never. (This is an issue, by the way, very typical of John Ford). You have to see how he ends his errabunda crusade along highways and deserts.I.e., Eastwood speaks of symbols and beliefs of the motherland, but tried and tested under a strong critical look and bitter, as wanting to rid of this collective drunkenness that he was part from its position of industrial Narrator. The film, therefore, is sincere and deeply crepuscular and elegiac, combat myths and the ghosts that poisoned the minds of the citizens helpless before the harshness of events, which always seeks a way of escape to the myth. And let us not forget that when the myths go as timely and local to the universal, has been a first step towards fascist totalitarianism. And ojito to the three central characters, that each of them is representing three different prisms through which is is weaving the criticism and bitter look: all three are victims of an incipient fascism, they themselves are the excuse from which manufacture the large lies that form a poisonous myth for minds. Falsehoods (heroes of the fatherland, forgers and protectors of the democracies) which in the future may be used to idealize and justify the wars and invasions.Eastwood - As Spielberg in "Saving private Ryan", that discussed another day - the poison that can convert these falsehoods, but humanity hidden and violated after the uniform and undergo under the propaganda apparatus is not interested. And expresses it in a direct, simple and beautiful at the past levels of the film: a group of boys, stripped of their armor of war - abandoned in the sand of the beach of Iwo Jima - who, for a few moments, are preparing to enjoy the game, splash in the water, the laughter shared with colleagues and amigos.lo a lot toin spite of everything, remains of humanity. And that is the moral; the truth over lies, the person real and vulnerable over the armor and idealized hero, the intimate and sincere identity above all the flags and the homelands. Some unwary are already saying is a film nativist and simplistic, but is a lesson of humanity in which the issues and the patriotic iconography is the initial excuse, the starting point of a race to the discovery of truth, at the same time that are putting in evidence the burdens that hinder the best of life and of the human being.On this last, should emphasize the magnificent structure, quite unique in addition. It is not a linear narrative, but circular. Already been said; Eastwood proposes a journey of discovery, and this route extends in a narrative that is including new information and expand the full spectrum of narrated experience. I.e., are several concentric circles that extend the perspective as it is advancing the story: from the beginning to the purest style of the war classic film, then shades are introduced as we discover the circumstances, feelings and thoughts of the characters (a smaller circle item is a larger, one covering more information, and thus the story is revealing) until the final resolution, the largest circle that integrates and includes all previous development, in a magnificent setting of the meaning and the final message.In conclusion, a film that has everything to be misunderstood and also has everything to be a great movie. It has its flaws and may not be a round work: excessive length and very well defined characters but do not have the depth and freshness that would have been able to have. Above all, a classic delicacy, an honest and beautiful film that leaves after if a great thematic complexity subjected to an exhibition so fluid that the confused them will be too simple. |
2,842 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3013 | Bloody Will | Cabeza de muerte | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Do the best example of what is called? crappy film?: a story on an acrid basis can extend during more than an hour and a half. | Dead is as I am as soon as you have finished the film, and that had fallen into the coma of stupidity in the 40.Con minute only 30% of the comments of our illustrious readers already I do a script 300 times more attractive and coherent than this absurd movie has no where to take it.This is the best example of what is called 'crappy film': a story on an acrid basis can extend during more than an hour and a half. We proceed to the analysis.The basis: is borne by six tasteless characters seeking to make camping and put at the top of hallucinogenic mushrooms. Apart from that I do not know very well why travel together from the USA to Ireland if they are not supported between them. That Yes, have no better idea that doing so in a forest incommunicado and with mobile phones confiscated (?). Seen and requetevisto.The threat: ancestral story about a killer priest and a boy hooded put the 'imminent danger' point for the encamped. The figure of the 'slasher' appears from nowhere and without any originality. Now everything begins to smell to rotten.The turning point: puts it the protagonist, that without coming to story eats a mushroom called 'head of death'. I look at until the peppers when there to cook them, and the girl in the film gets into the mouth first thing found in the forest. Very logical, Yes.The rest is to get out of the armchair and say enough is enough. A cow who speaks, an axe that comes to know from where, the girl group appearing after a career of 10 seconds to two kilometers from the camping area or the main reason of eating mushrooms that disappears without any explanation.Above, to finish the story sold me an only possible ending in case appear Alan Cummings in his role as night Painkiller of the X-Men: I do 'chas' and appear at your side .Not to criticize a film has no script, and whose interpretations are exceeded even by some contestants in a reality show famous. Not afraid, has no suspense, has nothing to keep the viewer's attention, and to make matters worse there are to pay 6 euros and peak to see it.Luckily Yul B. eliminated the category of classification of criticisms didn't have the's ' piece of m ** da I've seen '. |
2,843 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3331 | Alberto Concepción | El sueño de Cassandra | 2 | 5 | muchocine | It follows that whiff to telefilm, which you can hardly avoid smell it... | Woody Allen is a great film of all time. He is a genius, no doubt. But, citing a phrase itself, not devoid of sense, I have to say that "the genius also disprosean".In his third film shot in London, Allen returned to the line had been drawn up recently with his masterpiece, Match Point. But this time, the ambition it adds family, lies, delitos.y money. All these elements in the hands of the New York can give as a result a great movie. But, of course, this is not the case.The main problem of Cassandra's Dream is the whiff to telefilm has. Their first ten or fifteen minutes are worthy of a film of Antena 3, a Saturday after eating. I feel extremely vulgar comparison, but it is the most appropriate. The dialogues and photography are so mediocre that one cannot understand that we are really dealing with a work of Allen. Although the plot on paper has its point of interest, his approach and development is so bland that it is boring. Mediocre. Very mediocre.The unique virtues of this, no longer minor works, but bad film, are probably the performances of Colin Farrell and Ewan McGregor. They are not exceptional, but they do have good moments. But its major drawback is that they are loaded with all the weight of the film. And it is not enough to lift.But, if were not enough, the pace is too slow and the film seems to combine the drama and the comedy with a formula that does not end curdling. The way to delve into the human psyche is comic, and does not seem to be his claim that that works. The McGregor character reminds the of Rhys-Meyers in Match Point, but the depth of it is vague and comes to be almost unbelievable.Allen ends its cycle London, probably in the worst possible way, and who knows if thinking that either he put too much interest after Match Point and Scoop. His next film seems to lead an even worse way. "Vicky Cristina Barcelona" will come to our screens next year. Go name. |
2,844 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4032 | Francisco Bellón | Los Crímenes de Oxford | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The Oxford crimes, not ceasing to be one film more than correct, is quite aseptic as it has neither force nor the hook that could presuppose a work of Álex de la Iglesia. | Spanish cinema has begun 2008 with enough force, at least in theory, and is that the premiere of the new film by a filmmaker of the stature of Mario Camus joins now of the crimes of Oxford, the new work of another great director of our filmography (literally and metaphorically).Álex de la Iglesia gave vital impetus to the cinema of terror and mystery, or what today covers with the simple name of cinema "of gender" in our country. They were better or worse their films, they always are couldn't recognize the style of the Bilbao filmmaker, who always gave his works a hilarious touch of black comedy. For these reasons, and for the bad film harvest of 2007, the Oxford crimes expected as water may, but the truth is that after seeing her, the most appropriate word to describe it is disappointing. History is more grandstanding and empty at the same time, and while it is true that keeps the interest, isn't that leave you stuck to the seat containing the breath. The script embarulla with so many logical series and philosophical digressions, and without wishing it, diverts attention from the real heart of the matter, whose conclusion, stuck with a shoehorn, not convinced at all. The characters are quite flat, and some of them come to be ridiculous, or are mere vases, Lorna a lost Leonor Watling is neither nor the expected. Álex de la Iglesia-style is not recognized except at specific moments, as one of the discussions between Anna Massey and Julie Cox.Los crimes of Oxford, not ceasing to be one film more than correct, is quite aseptic since it has neither force nor the hook that could presuppose a work of Álex de la Iglesia. And it is that it is impossible to create the ideal climate calling loudly for a good mystery story with so many philosophical and mathematical theories. |
2,845 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1139 | Rafa Marin | El truco final (The Prestige) | 5 | 5 | muchocine | We have the first great film of the year. A serious and rigorous adaptation that does not have any qualms about simplify the history of the novel, cutting it in the precise and stripping of secondary sub-plots. | Good movies of good books, can be although it surprised us. And it can be to remain faithful to the spirit and the characters and betraying the letter whatever is missing so the film product, which will never remove the book from where it starts, can understand itself and is, in its own structure, a work that hold single. It is what they have done Christopher Nolan and his brother Jonathan with the work of his namesake Christopher Priest: a serious and rigorous adaptation that does not have any qualms about simplify the history of the novel, cutting it in the precise and stripping it of secondary sub-plots to focus simply on the history of shared obsession with two magicians and their continuous feints in search of a revenge has no meaning beyond the pursuit of confrontation by the prestige. Raised almost like a play in their lack of scenic air, almost always in closed enclaves which refer to the scenarios or the scenes where the two magicians (or their engineers or scientists) are its representations and their training, prestige (absurdly pretitulada in Spain "The final trick", I imagine that because the same the name of the movie recalls a sunken ship that conveniently then did not want to agree to no one) is a scenic duel between Hugh Jackman and Christian Bale, converted each in reflection of the other, with juicy game narrative, in mirrors of themselves. Helps rather than a giant of the interpretative as Michael Caine provided the necessary serenity and appreciated that, stripped of subterfuges narrative history, the presence of three women on stage (including the beautiful Scarlett Johansson) is adequately high. Without renouncing the narrative technique of desbarajados flashbacks so good result gave in Memento and Batman Begins, here the feints in the feints allow perfectly the game of newspapers and discoveries, structural hocus passes that can confuse who is not in the garlic of the narration from the beginning. Because, as they warn the images and the voice of Michael Caine, everything is in sight and the narrative of the film already shows, almost at the beginning, between the Canaries, is the great mystery of the trick of the Transportado man. The graduation of the history improves the climax of the book, and focuses to perfection in the appearance of Nikola Tesla, perhaps too soberly interpreted by a severe David Bowie, or perhaps I expect to see something closer to Ziggy Stardust. Although it hints in any line of dialogue, it would have been interesting to see some of the compulsive food obsessions of the own Tesla in the lunch scene. With planes that sometime referred to Coppola's Dracula (arrival at Colorado powerfully reminds the arrival of Jonathan Harker to Transylvania, and in some walk in London one almost can see close to anda Mina Murray in the body of Wynona Rider), the dramatic tension builds up in an intense narrative, almost to against the grain in the film today. Perhaps somewhat loses the reference quantum tongue-in-cheek to the cat of Tesla and his science ahead of time, so the viewer will no doubt believe that we are seeing a new magic trick. Deliberately confined to an apparent secondary role (perhaps in the book her character has more force), Christian Bale gives much of the footage and the performance to a magnificent Hugh Jackman, who is not only able to briefly play a dual role, but that changing her pose and imagine that slightly his physique, gives the impression of being another person indeed: we will have to wait for the DVD to hear him declaim to Henry IV in his constant drunkenness. Only must be set carefully to realize that we are before the first great film of the year. |
2,846 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2601 | Dragon negro | Los Simpson: La Película | 3 | 5 | muchocine | So dose of Homer just overwhelming, but one cannot leave satisfied the screening room by seeing their favorite characters on a large screen. | The transition to the big screen was something that the Simpsons should have done long ago, and is it already took a series of less successful in having their format on the big screen and was also something that everyone who have followed her sometime expected forward.The transition to cinema has sat well the characters and is the technical Bill in these cases always comes out benefit and the Simpsons are never had seen before, with greater detail and definition, shadow and camera movements that the television format not offered. The film took the opportunity to review of characters and situations already views and any minimum follower of the series and its constant repetition in Antena 3 known. But to have a linear argument misses the opportunity of having done a more choral film and that other characters have more prominence because it makes the problem that just focusing too much on the character of Homer Simpson and leading him to such an extent of committing so many stupid past Raya you just passing and losing part of his grace.Anyway it retains the irreverent humor that has made the famous series, many gags are really fun and while such doses of Homer ends up overwhelming one can not satisfied out of the projection room by seeing their favorite characters on a large screen. |
2,847 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/254 | Tito Chinchan | Superman returns | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Popcorn, giant Coke, and a cushion for the moments of torpor. Many special effects, but little script. Was it necessary for her to return? | Watch that to me this Superman never caught my attention. For starters, it is very limited as character, given that is invincible. I.e., that in every episode I need Kryptonite to defeat him. Then he redo and melts at the bad based on call. Their love problems find me stupid at not being able to. And then, the topic that your great costume is remove the glasses from timorous reporter to superhero damages human intelligence. No, I do not like Superman. I prefer to Spider-man, that always they creak you, to Hellboy who is a bitter life, X-Men that are variaditos, etc.The film is an extraterrestrial Superman that after five years of retirement looking for the remains of his homeworld, returns to Earth. Falls, quickly resumes his life of journalist in the Daily Planet, hoping to return with the woman of his dreams. But not everything is as he hopes, given that she has partner and a child, for it focuses on two things, save the world from the evils which torment him and try to bind to its reporter. On the opposite side, Lex Lutor (the bad very bad) has escaped jail on grounds of form and is redoing his empire of evil and terror. -Against the new threat that fly over on the United States, may Superman I say on the world? This. Let me think. well I think that if.Buff, this is a hell. Let's start with the good stuff. The sets and special effects are delicious, with the culminating point in the scene is that Clark followed with his supermirada to Lois through the elevator. Everything is assembled with great care, especially in the city. In this aspect I really liked. In the flat negative is the script, which is a turn of the screw more a character which I consider to be very limited, to the only to be defeated by the Kryptonite. For starters, what you intend to Lex Lutor teaming up with this bunch of incompetent? In addition, to urbanism Councillor to earn money, there Superman gets no hand. Then, I can understand that Superman fly and be invincible, since for that I'll see a fantastic film. Now well, Lois shake on a plane hitting against everything and leave without a scratch I think not. It is simply absurd. And what I say layer of Superman? It has its own life. If low, the layer remains steadfast waving it. That is in space? It therefore trespasses as a flag (although there is no atmosphere). I like science fiction, but with a bit of reality. And well, the final crushing of the film is not where to take it. Oh, and do not you espereis action as well the type X-men, which is more reminiscent of Hulk and their problems to achieve that the package fattening you in the same way as the muscles.Speaking of packages, it is rumored that you have had to cut digitally the said actor main, since they say that in that regard if it is Superman. And I say, a Superman shouldn't have a super Member? I think that if. By the way, led to this Superman to a level much more metrosexual, fleeing from the aesthetic muscled of the comics. Would that have even aflautado you too, with the Crystal face that.In short, drum large popcorn, giant Coca-Cola, probe (which are well served 150 minutazos) and a cushion for the moments of torpor. Many special effects, but little script. |
2,848 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2904 | Jeremy Fox | Shrek Tercero | 2 | 5 | muchocine | It is the strongest points of the previous entries, where the tape does not stand the comparison with its predecessors. | Again premiered a sequel, again, is one-third of a successful franchise and new criticisms have been unanimously negative.Against this background went to the cinema to see her, thinking that it might not be true that this year all (or almost) released sequels were so disappointing. Again I was wrong.It cannot be said that “ third Shrek ” is bad because it would be a lie or exaggeration. But with two great films on their backs (” Shrek ” and “ Shrek 2 ” without me looking like great seem to me very good) one hopes to keep the quality in the script, grace and rhythm. But it is precisely there, the strongest points of the previous entries, where the tape does not stand the comparison with its predecessors.To give a few examples, I would say that trying that with a couple of intimate scenes with Arthur, Shrek discovers his paternal instinct is something ridiculous and bad thing is that it shows too. In addition, force of wanting two actions parallel (the adventures of Shrek and Fiona) both just for not having enough entity as to engage the Viewer. I fear that this is due to a working inexplicably little (or bad) script.Nor the rhythm is right for hooking, and sometimes indeed cansino (the beginning and everything that happens in the University City). Despite this, get back something the flight and it just proving entretenidilla (although by the hairs).Perhaps ballast in excess by the absence of rhythm and a good script, what more is missing in this installment is the spark. This subversive grace became famous and that has created some school, has totally lost and, although I don't believe they make me case, I do not think that it is time to throw the bolt to the series.And it is the excessive repetition of elements that make a play, original just eliminating the originality and the ability of subversion that gave it its value. A lesson in Hollywood do not stop learning.Final evaluation of moonfleet.es: 5 out of 10 |
2,849 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4109 | Ramón Besonias | Los Crímenes de Oxford | 2 | 5 | muchocine | A pity, because the actors - except an Elijah Wood which still not can be cleared his fronted of hobbit - do their work with ease (Julie Cox excels in a role that Hitchcock Bachelor), and the camera falls rightly. | We have some certainty? Thus begins the last of an unknown Alex de la Iglesia. Yes, we can be sure that you can do better, Alex, much better. And it seems, if you recuperaras a little even the bad milk (black, than non-white) that brewed your previous achievements (except the insufferable 800 bullets and indecent daughter, dead of laughter). You don't feel well make you cold to the Eastwood or the intellectual to the Allen, or at least that is what demonstrates this experiment (I hope!), a boring simulation of philosophical mecano with dyes of Cluedo, spiced with the salvific presence of Eleanor, that if it fails to get the temperature with your apron we would have died of sudden freeze.Please, Alex, what more bad screenplay! One just by importing a damn if you see one dead and how so unfortunate incident occur. And is that the Oxford murders are forced the Viewer to raffle narrative gear with weak lighting of a chaotic and forced logic which eventually reveal itself for what it is, pure smoke. It is not that the Oxford murders want to make a thesis of the metaphysical gaming - which also-, but that she herself becomes this indeterminacy through the constant exercise of fidelity to this inconsistency.A pity, because the actors - except an Elijah Wood which still not can be cleared his fronted of hobbit - do their work with ease (Julie Cox excels in a role that Hitchcock Bachelor), and the camera falls rightly. But this evocative soundtrack of Roque Baños (heiress of a Hermann hitchcockiano) does not deserve such absurdities of script, not. Perhaps faithfulness to the text of Guillermo Martínez (Premio Planeta 2003 in Argentina with this novel) the essential such disruption reason. What role of insurance will be an intelligent exercise of intrigue stained by the seductive falsehoods of labyrinth logical fallacies, to pass it to celluloid thing blurs in a quagmire has pretentious dialogues rather than look to the armchair, we escuecen without thrill.Alex slips when gets carried away by the excesses which populate his imaginary film lover, so if you do walking down the freak underworld as if you decide - as this is the case - emulate the labyrinthine intrigue of the angrosajón of the 1970s cinema (the footprint). Why the community is still his best creation, because without betraying his imagination, it offered a contention that denoted maturity without losing their non-transferable style.I guess that everything is to be patient and wait for your next.We will always be the Watling. |
2,850 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3163 | Ana Belén Pacheco | 1408 | 2 | 5 | muchocine | The first part, about the first 40 minutes, has an impeccable invoice with the dose just that portends that we will see a great film of suspense and tension that melts the air staying in a bunch of clichés of the horror film. | It has just presented at the Sitges 2007 festival with a sense of "neither cold nor heat" and will be in charge of closing the event with his second pass screening. The story is based on a short story by Stephen King, and could well have stayed at a short interesting fiction. But unfortunately 1408 account only with the names of the protagonists to attract the public to the room. The story sounds like known. A mediocre writer (Cusack) after having published a brilliant novel specialises in guides for tourists of the esoteric and travels throughout the United States to find hotels with Ghost more terrifying. A postcard invites you to visit the Dolphin Hotel where a room, the 1408, has a mortality rate among its guests so high that they have decided to close it. With the intention of checking which terrifying is it person in the hotel where his officer (Samuel l. Jackson) tries to convince that it is not a good idea but John Cusack, our "fearless" writer, gets fully into the room that will slowly playing her tricks. The penalty is that we are already a bit tired of hearing the same story from the mouth of the famous and valued above writer about tormented characters who dedicate their life to bury under the books themselves write. Especially the recent secret window La is a ghost hanging over this tape.Carefully reading this synopsis does anyone come you to mind "The shining"? And to so many others? It is this the main weak point of the film, one has the feeling leaves vu from the first moment that the character of Cusack crosses the door of the enchanted room. And anecdotal because I must admit that the first part about the first 40 minutes, has an impeccable invoice with the dose just that portends that we will see a great film of suspense and tension that melts the air staying in a bunch of clichés of the horror film. The solution of the director is trying to surprise with several unexpected twists that are a bit forced and childish and being discovered even disappoint the Viewer. The penalty is that I have no very clear until that point I must blame the Director, the screenwriter or the King himself. If I had to risk it would say that producers should look for ideas in other writers and take a deep breath.PostScript. For lovers and detractors of Samuel l. Jackson (that I am aware that there are many) is actually a secondary but because you know that it is very beautiful in the poster. |
2,851 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2528 | Tito Chinchan | Harry Potter y la piedra filosofal | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The film I liked. It is not a wonder of wonders, but since then it has much charm. Perhaps the end is a little weird, but we're going to do. | First of all, I declare me the books of Harry and Potter fan. Of his films I am somewhat less fan, although I bought the pack of DVDs with the first three. And that shame to buy them, who told me those sold them only in the section of children, who were not adult movies. Because ale, I am glad, that also came me cheaper than Star Wars.La film is about a kid who is left in a House by a group of strange wizards when it is nothing more than a baby. Twelve years later, the kid has grown and his situation in life has worsened considerably. He lives under the stairs in the House of his uncles, which hate you and it is continuously persecuted by his unpleasant cousin. But this situation has changed the day that receives a strange letter from a school for wizards.The first of the Harry Potter saga introduces us to the characters in the story in a gradual way and nothing forced. It has a pretty child script, which does not mean it's not interesting. The atmosphere that creates the truth is that I love, given that everything is surrounded by a magical touch us like adults with children's tastes. Then the characters are very accomplished, and small not give too del cante.In short, the movie I liked. It is not a wonder of wonders, but since then it has much charm. Perhaps the end is a little weird, but we're going to do.Infantiloide, but can be seen very well.Besitos.P.D: The magical worlds that create certain writers should be subsidized by the Estado.P.D.2: I want to be Hogarts! I agree with Ron, I do not ask for much more. Although Hagrid nor me unwelcome. |
2,852 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4188 | Andrés Pons | Zombies | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Up to the hour of footage does not appear nor one and when decide to enter in action see four kids with makeup that it seems to chalk, pace slow where except for the bottom seems a dramatic movie. | Film scheduled be orchestrated by the author of the massacre of Texas TOOBE HOOPER after failing agreement is replaced by CARDONE author of vampires in the desert or death in 8 MM 2. A cast composed of Chloe Moretz displayed on the nine versions of THE EYE and LORI HEURING wears in the pleasant summer of seduction.Practically the work of the interpreters is the best thing in this disaster, with a title so unequivocal as ZOMBIES is therefore expected to see precisely many of them. Up to the hour of footage does not appear nor one and when decide to enter in action see four kids with makeup that it seems to chalk, pace slow where except for the bottom seems a dramatic movie.Little budget left note in all paragraphs technical associate with mediocre makeup, the nursery school photography, music that is not right at any time in a direction of the horrible Mr cardone.Little you save from this crappy. |
2,853 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/287 | Daniel Galindo | Domino | 2 | 5 | muchocine | In film terms, this production is clumsy, treacherous and fullera, with a hodgepodge which call Assembly | Live fast and die faster still. If we look at the caption we just invent, this film can be criticized quickly: futile, irregular and scrap of worship. But does not create that felt us entirely misguided because that he is loyal to its principles and complies with everything what is proposed, from the first commandment: provocarás to all those who spend their money on movie tickets. Now, this is not art but a product that comes from time to time nor bad. Never mind that or concert, with dozens of flash-backs is filmed without a warrant and pulling of advertising resources and light video clips; chaos reigns in Domino and Tony Scott (he/she brother of Ridley) takes him for flag, seasoned with a bath of humor and bravado, memories of Beverly Hills 90210 including. In movie terms, this production is clumsy, treacherous and fullera, with a hodgepodge which call Assembly that denotes how wrong (or not, and this is the funny thing) which is responsible for titles such as Top gun, Spy game, red tide and fan. But as any film style (ex officio assassins, true romance, Pulp Fiction), Domino will have detractors and supporters in equal parts. I have to acknowledge the history of this posh girl restored by the bad — and more interesting — way hooked me from the first moment, in part by his spoof tone? visible in the realization of the television programme on busca-malhechores-Squadron and its dish approach to social, evident in the lesson of racial dialectic, with chinegros and other pseudorazas. The surprise of the unpredictable is the only reason why one can digest the changes of pace, the disinterest of the second part, impossible levels, the pedal that leave us without breath and the slowdowns and moments frozen in contrast. It is not easy dish, so arrived in this line, rises the number of maldicientes, sure. Do in the world of fiction, the rotulito of? based on real events? gives the story told some vehemence status, although it is not guarantee of good doing that, for unusual, the life of the real Domino Harvey, who died before they see the results. She gave her consent that they have his frantic step worldwide but, as in all fiction that aims to attract spectators, there is more action than answers to all the questions that we are on this woman's arms take. Scott is limited to offer us a couple of pictures so we keep quiet, without becoming the preguntones that his long iconoclast 24–6. No style that grab, only interpretations, so maybe the tape? leaning again towards the most critical - is without doubt the choir and its protagonist: Beautiful Damsel stuck to mercenary that hard to recognize in his role of macarrilla studies, hunting rewards looks with disdain the past years who lived rise in heels. An excellent work of Keira Knightley, a curious tape, Domino, that it will go unnoticed, a perception that one has to write about this film made from scraps, some better fabrics than others. |
2,854 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/650 | Alberto Concepción | Los tres entierros de Melquiades Estrada | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The performance and direction of Tommy Lee Jones (speaking with a Mexican accent Spanish...) and the screenplay of Guillermo Arriaga become worthy of mention and observation tasks. | Pete Perkins (Tommy Lee Jones) is the foreman of a small town to the South of Texas, on the border with Mexico, which decides to investigate the death of his friend, Melquiades Estrada (Julio César Cedillo), work that will lead to "hijack" the guilty party, Mike Norton (Barry Pepper), and force him to cross the border with him to bury his friend. While the overview might seem uninteresting, perhaps maybe the tape is the script.Great debut in the direction by Tommy Lee Jones, who also also complies correctly no less important role in the movie. The screenwriter for the film, Guillermo Arriaga, known for writing the screenplays of Amores Perros and 21 grams, shows us his particular touch to telling us the story with this series of "temporary"leaps"that already accustomed us.From what the flame "First burial" until "The trip", the film may err on the side of lack of depth, because the viewer wondered what is what is intended us to say, teach, stress. However, is then, in the beginning of the journey, when the film begins to take ease, but also strength: it deepens the relationship between Perkins and Norton, shows the daily life of a border basis between Mexico and the us.Surely the film will be history as one of the best, and can reach seem slow pace. However, the performance and direction of Tommy Lee Jones (speaking Spanish with accent Mexican.) and the screenplay of Guillermo Arriaga become worthy of mention and observation tasks (not in vain, won their respective awards at the Cannes Festival).PS: Must see original version (mixture of dialogues in English and Spanish) |
2,855 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2988 | Bloody Will | Disturbia | 3 | 5 | muchocine | A correct juvenile thriller, Bill good, middling performances, but that surely will have the favour of those who are still in the age of Turkey. | One of the surprises of what it far this year in the United States.UU. -as far as box office is concerned - has been, without a doubt, the film before us.Do in its first three weeks of display to the general public got staying in the number one position, either by their own virtues, by the loose jurisdiction of releases or its blatant similarities with the master Hitchcock classic?The indiscreet window?, and therefore causing, the curiosity of knowing if it was a bad copy more or not.Will soon land on our screens, so you can judge for yourselves which is the reason for its unusual success. For my part, I can only explain my humble opinion, which I hope will serve, at least (not intend more), to become a idea of what the tape DJ. Caruso offers us, and not so much influence the predisposition of the possible future spectator.The first thing one should try to avoid to have to see the movie, and later judge, are the obvious comparisons that raises to the work of the King of suspense.First because, analyzing it from the comparison?Disturbia? it lost by a landslide, thereby making it possibly one already is deprived to enjoy. And secondly, because the Caruso film is not so much a remake, but a teenager update of their well-founded bases, past this time through easy and purely commercial product. Does this not say that this film don't be a blatant copy of?The indiscreet window?, but Needless to say that it intends not to equate to it.In this case, the protagonist of the film is the young Kale (Shia LaBeouf), a normal and ordinary, teenager whose quiet life is truncated after the fateful death of his father in a car accident. Instant implications of this fact are noted in the radical change of the personality of Kale, who felt partly responsible for the tragic event, encloses in itself, becoming a rather shy and solitary person.Kale, after hitting a punch to a foolish teacher, was sentenced to 3 months of arrest at home, confined as well between the suffocating walls of his house, trying to kill time-based video games and TV cable. But the monotonous daily routine will change with the arrival of some new residents to the neighborhood, whose attractive daughter will lead our prota voyeuristas logons.But not only the neighbor of the side will be object of observation, but also the rest of its neighbors, including Mr. Turner, whose strange behaviour disturbed Kale, to the point that we suspect that he is a serial killer wanted by the police.It will be from there when what started as a mere entertainment, will become an addictive game for which possibly Kale is not ready. A game that to advance the plot, become more dangerous. So much so that it will not be a game to become a real nightmare.The premise, but is nothing original, at least if it is interesting. The beginning, idyllic and topical in the initial minutes, already contains one of the most impressive sequences of the film. At the same time, it is also one of the most dramatic moments of the story. I am referring, obviously, to the turning point that will change the life of Kale: the death of his father.What follows is the adaptation of Kale in his confinement at home: how time passes, how begins to spy on their neighbours and learn their habits, routines and secrets; how they begin to emerge - not only sexual feelings - towards its neighbour; and how begins to become obsessed with su, in appearance, calm neighbour, Mr. Turner.En greater measure, we can consider the greater part of the film as a teenager comedieta, with the typical obsessions of the youngsters of today day (with a mention, the more the better, on the heritage of these, such as an Xbox, iTunes or YouTube), mixing certain dyes of suspense (with its almost unnecessary and false scares)with that touch of juvenile humor and some dialogue, at times, superficial.Do so could say without fear of plausibly, that?Disturbia? It is a product addressed directly to the younger audience, but why not be frightening to the rest. This is, by all means, that the viewer feels, in one way or another, identified with the protagonist and his friends. And it is movies for teens do not always have to be them?American Pie? turn and their substitutes; or they have to always be portrayed as some junkies with triggered hormones (be them, any, of course) so the director labra the way developing interpersonal relationships between the protagonists (some more than others) for later, reach the final climax of the film. Unfortunately, most of the characters are defined by a few already preset canons, without greater depth than that, so finding the friend rarete and funny, the solid neighbour, the mother working but unable to connect with his son (being the character most loose and untapped), etc.Kale, interpreted by a more than convincing LaBeouf is the character more elaborate, getting the empathy of the viewer nothing more start function. It is also, who supports the entire weight of the film, which is not easy taking into account the few spaces in which occurs it.His enemy in this case, is the mysterious Turner, played by the versatile David Morse, whose appearances in scene are rather specific but always grateful and constant anxiety-laden modestly.Somehow, we could even say that both characters share certain personality traits such as shyness, the loneliness that surrounds them, their social bookings?And little more than say for not gutting you nothing, although he could not reveal too taking into account the predicable is everything, or almost everything, though, and that itself is welcome, is free from final turns absurd and without coming to tale, as they come being usual in thrillers of last generation. We will, for once, do not take the Viewer by silly or they Jeer him.In short, a correct juvenile thriller of good invoice, middling performances (However, highlighting the good work of LaBeouf, and ultimately, the Morse) to which can blame you leave the action to the end, but that surely will with the favor of those who still are in the age of Turkey. Humor, a little bit of intrigue and uncertainty and modernilla and commercial music (except some that another topic) for little more than 100 minutes of simple and conventional entertainment. be the neighbor of Kale really a serial killer? Or is any product of his boundless imagination and his boredom?. If you want to know it, the answer in your nearest cinema from next Friday. |
2,856 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4372 | Jefe Dreyfus | Los 4 Fantásticos y Silver Surfer | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Film for children than anything else, that holds for barely an hour to conclude with a very bad ending. | Good morning, I am Chief Dreyfus, with one of these releases on dvd are leaving pending or lack of desire, until that one day you're going and you decide. Big mistake. Now: The fantastic four and Silver Surfer (a test of fire) started! Because that second part of the fantastic four, which are a few superheroes coming out of the pages of an older comic shit, where a guy is stretched everything you want to another becomes invisible, other lights up flames and fly and the fourth is a Turkey of stone. In this second foray into the big screen (jojojojo typical sounds like this, I'm going to potar) will appear a few weather irregularities on the planet (nothing to do with the tight dress of Jessica Alba at first) and it is that they are caused by Silver Surfer, a silver guy, who flies on a surf board and turns out to be the dog lazarillo de a sort of cosmic entity that comes to lunch is our planet. To all this, the doctor death (guess I appearing for what that the actor should already have signed for several films because in this not paints nothing) also points to the party for a bit more messing. Can our heroes save the planet? There will be third party? And, most importantly, do have possibilities to link to Jessica Alba? Good, good. I am aware that when one begins to see this kind of films already know what faces and must be consistent. And in fact, when I saw the first part, the total and absolute lack of pretensions of the tape got that, in part, the movie even I came to fall sympathetic at times. But now I notice that this was not the case of this second part. And is that here the history gave to much more, with the entry into the galactus fucking scene (damn, that are not talking about just a sister of charity, that here are theme!), but the truth is that they are more than one hour of film fucking the SOW (no, now I was not referring to Jessica Alba) with nonsense and in the end when he had to come really interesting and the pyrotechnicsthe thing is solved in the most simplistic, ridiculous and easy (and incomprehensible) we are posts. Already notice that I am not exaggerating, the final twenty minutes is not that they are bad, is that they are terrible, with a staging of school primary school in village of twenty inhabitants play (these scenarios of Tokyo not slip anywhere) and with a bad is a bluff. And tell me dance by Reed Richards in the nightclub scene? Was someone else tempted in cutting veins? And I think that the writers should think: If this is taken from a comic book, is that it must be for children!, or something of the sort because if it is not not be understand why they insist on getting the plots of the comics, to ignore them or fucking when it comes to the truth (or much less respect them) and do their own adaptation to all kinds of public (for all kinds of audiences of 3 to) (7 years, of course). Oh, and take the time to shout from the rooftops: am up to the eggs of the fucking cameo turn of Stan Lee's balls, which already is being done more than heavy with so much nonsense, hosts! In short: Film for children than anything else, that holds over an hour to harsh penalties to conclude with a very bad ending. |
2,857 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1068 | Elena Suárez | Babel | 3 | 5 | muchocine | It is without doubt, the worst movie of the director, who has failed to improve his masterpiece loves dogs, 2000. | On Friday, when I went to the cinema to see the expected premiere of the latest work of admired director Alejandro González Iñárritu, Babel, I estrañó see a group of teenage girls who not above 15 years of age. They are very mature or have come here by two of the players, Brad Pitt and Gael García Bernal - said to my himself. The issue is that, at the end of the film, the poor ended up crying as a few muffins, too much pain for a few teenagers - I thought. But the truth is that the loud sound was heard throughout the film, from some another kleenex fiddling with some restless naricilla inside. And it is not for less because, if we were to find a common denominator to the development of the three stories that make up the global narrative, this would be a pain.Precisely the suffering will be the engine that will move our protagonists, either in search of salvation, as a prelude to self-destruction. The pain means not of race, sex, age or social status and will get us the best or the worst.It is without doubt, the worst movie of the director (that has failed to improve his masterpiece loves dogs, 2000). The feeling I took is the work could have been much more than itself, but this argument should have worked more and not reach exhaustion (the history of the Japanese girl is tedious to induce indifference). Some scenes do not make no sense and have been directly introduced to force wedge, possibly on a whim of the director (that someone explain to me the meaning of the image of the Muslim girl masturbating, especially when a minute earlier was discussing with his brother).Instead, the film also features elements in their favor: a great work of completely unknown on the big screen actors (Adriana Barraza, Boubker Ait El Caid and Said Tarchani (the kids had never worked as actors;) the difficulty of linking in the script so different scenarios as the skyscrapers of Japan, the border between Mexico and United States and Morocco desert and, especially), the intention with which was born the film to talk of solitary confinement in which we live (remembering the chaos that originated Jehovah in the Tower of Babel). Only one Council: If you are one of those who have the easy tear, don't forget to take the handkerchief. |
2,858 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/171 | Jose Contreras | Déjate llevar | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Flags convinces the Director, students and parents, but still has to convince the public | Antonio Banderas makes Pierre Dulaine, a teacher of ballroom dancing, inspired by real life, seeking to bring forward an optional institutes oriented difficult children. First you have to convince the Director, then to the students, and finally parents. Is it good for something learn ballroom dancing in high school? Still has to convince the public.This is a case of film with interesting question. Dulaine provides several answers: "if their children learn to dance couples will learn to respect themselves," says to parents. The stories of the boys also want to demonstrate that it is worth. There are two students who are Romeo and Juliet, by the mess of family squabbles, a boy with complexes, a couple anti-snob and anti-racista compulsory presence, and a trio with jealousy that learn to express themselves with music.The creators did not seem to stay convinced these stories of students, nor with the sentences of the professor. They decided that if they wanted the film to function there had to be a competition and a prize. It's an enshrined formula that is too easy but on the other hand has always worked. I am not much interested discussing whether go old ways is good or bad cinema. He everyone tolerated according to their level of fatigue. But I was very much interested in the idea of the ballroom dancing as optional. The only thing I regret is to discover that the film is not the best forum to discuss educational proposals. It is good to propose them, but not to discuss them. Think that the stories of love and the third act which always has a thread earrings consume three-quarters parts of any story you want to retrieve invested. |
2,859 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1705 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | Invisibles | 4 | 5 | muchocine | A breathtaking experience, beautiful, rough, tender, sober.... | Isabel Coixet, Wim Wenders, Fernando León de Aranoa, Mariano Barroso and Javier Corcuera, driven by the inspiration and the money from Javier Bardem, have written in images the sadness of a world or their destruction for the sake of their indifference, their barbarism of its charisma stubbornness by to look away when it comes to lend a hand and raise hopes. The invisible is that, still, are not. They are not fantasmagorias or missing. Their presence is his complaint. What these small documentary show is the degree of confinement to which we have come to cope with the enormous weight of life, contaminated in a hurry, settled in ghosts, manumitida its beauty to throw her at this unworthy of a feast few who enjoy the sentimental and physical poverty of many others.Congo women raped and ninguneadas, apocalyptic drugs that hide fearless business, Colombian pariahs resembling characters from Steinbeck, mortality exacerbated in Bolivia and children who flee the adult depravity and took refuge in his childhood and do not want to make a fist with a weapon.These invisible living in our forgetfulness. They live in our memory, but we do not give voice: we arrumbamos them, we leave them, we impose them rough rope which is not ours. I do not know if incumbent us more now after it was invaded by the germ of this documentary. It is only a documentary: unfortunately. These forgotten crises ameliorate them anonymous NGOs, groups such as MSF (doctors without borders) and individuals as wayward as alien to all kinds of public relevance who contribute with their work or their economic effort so that, ultimately, change.The life that comes after the movie not returns us to the film: I guess that somehow also proceed with it as with all that therein show. We leave it in a prominent place in our memories for a long, but her then discard as experience and her rename in a chapter apart from name always very doubtful and that they have to do with the indifference, with solitary confinement. Unfortunately. Except for some (all know someone close) that has got more precarious artefacts, the heart of the world and perfect to go beyond smile where their collaboration is essential to readjust the errors in this world of ours so doomed to the paltry design when it is proposed. |
2,860 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/740 | Alberto Concepción | Los fantasmas de Goya | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The jumps that are produced, together with a somewhat forced development left the feeling that something is wrong. It can at best be seen. | Director Milos Forman is considered by many a ' cult' director. 'Amadeus', 'One flew over the cuckoo's nest' or the controversial (by its equal number of lovers and detractors) ' Man on the Moon', they are probably his most outstanding films, and as you can see, are quite disparate in terms of gender. Or not? Perhaps the human psyche predominates in some extent.The beginning of the movie we are in the Madrid of the 18th and 19th century: the burden of the Inquisition and the monarchical absolutism still stands, and the echoes of the revolution reach Spain. In this panorama lives the great Spanish painter Francisco de Goya. Do and in this sense, the film makes a different reflection (successful or not) of the Madrid then and the life of the artista.pero with a noticeable lack of hook, or can last throughout the film or it can be improved, irregularly, with the possible minutos.¿Es that the script has some guilt? Definitely, Yes. The jumps that are produced, together with a somewhat forced development left the feeling that something is wrong. While going through the perhaps somewhat excessive footage (or insurance unless it is could have used better), the viewer missing know more of the why of the changes in the works of the painter, because this is progressively relegated to the background. Wouldn't be more appropriate title as 'The ghosts of Agnes', the Muse of artist, excellently played by Natalie Portman? Or perhaps something referring to father Lorenzo (a correct Javier Bardem), that it almost becomes the protagonist of the film, especially in the initial part and end?May be one of the strong points details, merit special attention the vision of belonging to the Inquisition dungeons, and the portrait of the sick (incredible artistic aspect, to the point of leaving unrecognizable Portman); and also others, such as the production of a work process, or on the relations between the painter and the royalty (what great choice for the role of Charles IV: similar physique between Randy Quaid and the monarch is so real that it becomes comic), or even the soundtrack, which does not stand out, but has brilliant moments. But it is more than likely that vacuum that can leave (and leaves) the film despite more than any of its virtues.In short, 'The ghosts of Goya' is a film that, without Excel, be seen. But no more: as much would stress the interpretation of its main actors and a somewhat different at the time reflection. But it is unforgivable to submit to the great painter Spanish, and not get to deepen in him especially if we consider the title of the film. |
2,861 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2290 | Beatriz Perez | Hostel 2 | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Full of inconsistencies and absurd elements in his ridiculous script. The film too takes to boot, and everything that shows has not the slightest interest. | Eli Roth is poised to become one of the worst directors of all time, and soon his name will occupy a place of honor next to others such as Ed Wood or Uwe Boll. ?Cabin Fever? do had neither feet nor head, and?Do Hostel?, despite some point of black humor and true pace, did not stop being a joke a bit, focusing on sadism of characters without ton or they are, pure and cheap offal only because Yes. ?Hostel 2? It is even worse, and the truth is that it is a totally useless sequel, because it adds absolutely nothing to already seen, and it shows that it has been quickly and only running to generate easy money. And although his results are far below other blockbusters, the truth is that he will recover more than its ridiculous budget and amasará a good figure on the international market. In addition, Roth has managed that Mr. Tarantino House it within it and now identify you with him, as if that siriviera something to justify the zero quality of their tapes.The argument of?Hostel 2? It is virtually identical to its predecessor, simply change to guys for girls (not I who complains), is otherwise almost modeled to the previous. A group of three friends who are in Italy, end up in Slovakia, passing is of fear (never better said), and will go to a site that will be used to meet the hidden desires of a lot of depraved that pay for killing someone torturing him.But the only torture that exists here is the movie itself, full of inconsistencies and absurd elements in his ridiculous script. The film too takes to boot, all shows not has the slightest interest, the presentation of characters is long and boring, and when what happens already sabmos in advance that is going to happen, the film ends, no more. All lovers of gore and strong images, will come out greatly disappointed the film, which only contains three scenes of foul calls, that, that Yes, Roth cutting an iota to show all kinds of atrocities, to each which more beast. In fact, the film it based everything on that, which does not last or ten muntos on screen, so the joke is brutal.The characters are all absolutely stupid, and you want up to they load quickly to any of them. Then, the film has the habit of wanting to give back to emergencies, exchanging the roles of some characters, but everything is as little credible and too forced. In this respect I refer to its final part, in which one of the protagonists takes the reins of the matter, resulting everything absolutely implausible. And not to mention the dialogues, where there is not a single intelligent sentence. It is better for a film of this style will have dialogues to the Shakespeare, but one thing is that and well another vulgarity which here looks.A crappy monumental, completely lacking sense of humor, and which allow a nod to the godfather of the event, in a scene in which two characters are watching TV?Do Pulp Ficiton?, and which you don't pay too much attention, though it may seem otherwise. On the other hand, and much to our regret, despite the hardness of the images from the movie, this not dares with some possible lesbian relationship that had added you some curiosity to the subject, but nothing at all. On the one hand, the film is passed, and on the other hand, does not dare. Roth now prepares the adaptation of a Stephen King novel?Do Cell?, and says it will take a long time making it. That don't worry, some not demandaremos it apure. |
2,862 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1627 | Ramón Besonias | Robin y Marian | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Solid film and at the same time emotional envelope the | The imagination is not impartial; on the contrary it exercises with rigid dictatorship selected choices, providing pleasure or displeasure without asking permission or even mediate common sense in his blessings. For this reason, our personal memory in the field of cinema feeds a lush and varied cast of films that do not always coincide with what our reason us dictates as interesting, suggestive, and much less as a masterpiece. Why, the film travels with us, riding the frames of non-transferable way for everyone, as mounted one after the other the moments that are building our biography.When I was a kid, I was attending with enthusiasm and expectation the matinees of cinema that was then offered in the district every Saturday. First, the ritual of the supply; They could not miss the popcorn and some other sugary concoction that numb the nerves of the premiere (or increasing them, who knows). However, for our ignorance, all those movies were classic 1930s to 1950s. If anything ever came one of fear or disasters of the then (they ran the setentaimuchos years). And almost everyone in rigorous black and white, which was the color of the film we got used to see.Among these wonderful films I remember vividly one in particular. In it, a smiling and proud Errol Flynn? incorporated in a Frog costume to the Peter Pan - dared to confront the ill with arrogance and irony, while step it took Street to the chati of his adversary, a pavita Olivia de Havilland and that is soft that I guess it made then to my beautiful MOM, but in medieval plan. It was of course the mythical Robin of the forest, by Michael Curtiz (1938). But in the final scene of the duel to the death - stairs up, stairs down - where my nails could become at times a sad stump. All children in the room expected this duel we knew she would and what would be the outcome. Robin Locksey, one; evil usurper of thrones, zero.Forest Robin is optimism and vitality. Even the bad guys seem to smile (for schemed his misdeeds, of course), and swords crossing only to whom it must hurt. For a child, that Manichaean universe was a simple and accurate narrative that was going home happy knowing that was? that's obvious - always on the side of Justice and the protagonist chati, and that he would fight (as Frog Flynn) against all those who dare to encroach upon thrones or steal princesses which they are not entitled. Up himself Don Quixote would be eclipsed before the rush of adventurous adrenaline that condensaban my neurons out of that dark room of cinema.With age, a few bumps which gives the overestimated experience, and some other more adventure film, Robin of the forest remained in my memory as those flowers that one keeps and forgets the books are. When I returned to see her (three, five, I forget how many more), my rush became a conmiserada adult, tender half, asshole half smile. And so far. I guess that with old age recover one that ability to enthuse how easy and Pilgrim, and dream that it rises with the agile and rugged outlaw Robin these steep stairs from which put an end to the bad turn. Until then, are the bad guys who win most of the time this naive viewer who writes to you.For this same reason, a few years ago I discovered a gem that faithfully reflects the way we go through each one with the films that are posing to the bottom of the memory. It is not so well known Robin and Marian, Richard Lester (1976). Front of the jovial and epic nature of the version of Curtiz, this second conforms more to what is today often called as crepuscular, but keeping an exquisite romantic (away from the arrogance of the character played by Errol Flynn nervous saltimbanqui). The plot puts us many years before Robin ended with the injustices that threatened England and restored the legitimate throne of Richard Coeur de lion. Robin is serving his King, which already has a bit of heart and a lot of insatiable chieftain. Castles are not impeccable, the war has not just never and all the Knights are tired of serving his Lord. Luckily (who knows) Ricardo dies and Robin returned to his homeland after twenty years of absence. Everything is very different. Now nothing is left of the five years old, but still a bad (the Sheriff of Nothingham) governed by the lands of Locksey to loose leg. Marion, for its part, has got nun, which is what left a woman by then if he didn't marry you (and Marion already know that only had eyes for his Robin).A hoary and tired Sean Connery notes what has been everything and look for his dear Marion (an aging but splendid Audrey Hepburn), already installed in the monastic life. But the tragedy will again be which one to both characters in a joint venture that will make them live again (and even with more intensity, despite the fatigue and the reluctance) los años felices. The Sheriff of Nothingham, played by Robert Shaw, wants to take England to the clergy, and hence have the mature Hepburn is Abbess. Now you can imagine the rest. Robin and Marian escape back to Sherwood, where they meet a little group of Renegades of the dictatorial policy of the sheriff and are trying to without much resolution undermine its power.But nothing is the same that in times of Errol Flynn, however, life goes on as always - aspera for the honest and prosperous for the undesirable-, is expected that the happyends do not have room in this film. That Yes, they will always be Sherwood, that dream forest where lovers launched an arrow that will take them there never were.There are few endings so bitter and however so beautiful like this in Robin and Marian. If you have not seen the movie, you do not pinchéis on the link of the video and make a DVD right now. It is worth the attempt. The Declaration of love for Hepburn for Connery is an intensity that excites and leaves without words. And is that beyond the colorism and luminosity of the version of Curtiz, Robin and Marian is an example? as already was without forgiveness on the western - adult deconstruction of a (the adventure genre) that I needed this mature vision and without more decorated than the real, that life imposes on us with relentless ferocity, and only from the beauty and the love we exorcizamos and overcome.Does Lester? known rather for two films of the Beatles and Superman II and III - outboard the best film of his career, without lapsing into sentimentalism or repetitions to the use of this overused myth of the bold Bushranger and desposable Princess. And gives us a strong and at the same time touching film about lainmortalidad of illusions through the history of these two tanned lovers. |
2,863 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2394 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | Lo que no se ve | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Predictable telefilm dead half die and filmmakers to the Middle form that seeks to empalmados yawns and the feeling that we are taking very seriously the hair. There are monsters of worst artistic brewing, but - I don't know why - the argument might have worked... | The supernatural, on film, in literature, has always been easily marketable material. The ghosts of yesteryear, those who were born aureolados from romantic and distressed tirelessly towers, battlements and biting basements, mystery and prophecies, are now vague pop stars, snowmen got by the roller coaster of the box office, that is, to the Cape, the heavenly gate, the eldorado businessmen and productive. The chieftains of the cinemátográfica industry are old dogs and know making clunkers with decent wrapper as the case outlined here because what is not seen is an ectoplásmica boring, expensive telefilm with pretensions of tape of cult is seen the gótico-menstrual concoction in a thriller Film Institute, a youth Operetta and dead are not bad with little heart girls. The protagonist occupies a very wide spectrum of emotions that never, under any circumstances required by the capricious script, we know what is do what does or does not do, which is to be identical thing. So we could say of the tormented poet of the yuppie Seer who finds a passageway between life and death and runs between the sorna, the stupor and a vague whiff to Sherlock Holmes 5th class.I, I saw Ghost with age you have to see Ghost, understand that this unbearable hodgepodge of impossible love and astral travel comfort the teenage soul, requiring simple metaphysical ardours of modern melodrama not too laden with meaning. However, the film - which seems to be a remake of a Swedish film not distributed around here - is not among the bad ones of the year, but has lacked really little. The perpetrator of this almost-infamy (David S. Goyer) has in its showcase of achievements have written the great script for Batman begins. In his cajoncito of sins is directing Blade Trinity: that rare combination of hits and fatalities could not guarantee that here we were frank luck and we staged a good movie. It is one already very of return of boys tormented, touched by the numen of the beauty and very sophisticated destined to redeem the pecados ajenos with your generosity and wide philanthropy and what is not (The invisible in English) there is one particularly pelmazo, irritating, pain in the ass to a very great extent. |
2,864 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2652 | Silvia Giner | Avalon | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Film: production, worship and essential for any friki self-respecting. | The mythical AVALON was re-released Special Edition (two discs). A film of genius Mamoru Oshii that with his masterpiece of animation "Ghost in the Shell" inspired many filmmakers including the Wachowski brothers in their Matrix Trilogy (there are in fact copied sequences level by level of Ghost in the Shell and Larry Wachowski to publicly stated on several occasions that Mamoru is a pioneer of new styles that inspires him). Performed by the Polish Malgorzata Foremniak, who wears a look that reminds us of the legendary Lieutenant Kusanage, it tells the story of Ash, the best player of a clandestine virtual reality game called Avalon. In a future, diminished and apocalyptic society, this game becomes virtually a drug for those who cosumen.The aesthetics of the film arises towards the animation. Mamoru applied relgas of anime to wrap us in a mist in which you leave take the perspective of whether it really is a film or an animation, and why not, a video game.The pace is slow, perhaps excessive in some sequences. Avalon was selected at the Cannes film festival in 2001, awarded as "Best film" at the Durban International Film Festival, the London Sci-Fi Film Festival and Sitges - Catalonian International Film Festival where in addition also won the award for the best cinematography. in its Special Edition, Avalon occurs in 2 drives in which we can find material extra as: "Quotes of Mamoru Oshii", Making offSpecial effects, documentary film by the director and a photo gallery.Film: production, worship and essential for any friki self-respecting. Mamoru Oshii, is currently immersed in the rodje of the mysterious The Sky Crawlers of which very little is known except that its premiere scheduled in Japan on April 28, 2008 (in Spain maybe her or smell). |
2,865 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2749 | Alvaro Oliva | Locos por el surf | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Do not go down in history as one of the great films of animation, but?Crazy by the surf? It will delight children, lovers of surf and accommodating spectators. | The main interest and reason why I went to see this film, was the trailer reminded me to "Big Wednesday", film of surf par excellence. Thanks to this I have been able to enjoy an interesting proposal, in which Visual effects stand out above all.The story is quite simple, and even a bit absurd, that focuses on the hopes of a young surfer and Championship which has played in few days. As well, this small period of time could have been lengthened until a period more or less consistent with what is intended to (that are ready to win the Championship). However, "Crazy for surfing" has some very attractive characters, in the Spanish version are very well made, especially the chicken, voiced by Alexis Valdés. A novelty in this genus, is that the film is told as a television reporting, in which there are interviews, zooms and camera in hand movements troop "realism" to the tape.It will not go down in history as one of the great films of animation, but "Crazy for surfing" will delight children, lovers of surf and accommodating spectators. |
2,866 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1140 | José A. Peig | Salvar al soldado Ryan | 3 | 5 | muchocine | It is not a great movie by Spielberg, it is a superfluous product, but it is a great visual spectacle and entertainment consumption easy mode adventure film with a speech followed American institutional dogmas. | Third raid of Steven Spielberg in the second world war, popularly acclaimed in the past eight years since its premiere as one of his masterpieces and one of the best war films of all time, which is a mistake, start there. "Saving private Ryan", not only it is not a masterpiece but that I could say that it is one of the films most insubstantial, overblown and failures of the Filmography of the "King midas" of Hollywood. A filmography, incidentally step, so amazing and prodigious as irregular.However, are talking about one of the best narrators of the last forty years, a filmmaker already in their own right, as part of the basic iconography of the seventh art. Therefore soldier Ryan, being a product that does not reach the height of their claims, neither is it a brilliant, full film great moments that look the mastery of a visual and scenographic orchestration of the anthology. Anthology is the initial sequence of twenty minutes in length, by the creation of a climax of reality naked and torn, the "hiperrealism" that Spielberg inaugurated a style imitated in recent productions: "Flags of our fathers" or "Children of men". Never filmed the harshness of the battlefield of the way in which did Spielberg, and the fact that certain constituent sequences of a foundational style - in the framework of the cinema of masses - been imitation reason make them a small contemporary classic.Spielberg is a master when it comes to give show, we have no doubt, and the soldier Ryan is, above all, a show developed in a context of war film. The problem is that it is intended to be a discursive reflection on the war and on human ethics dilemmas and the military code of conduct. And, in the words of the own Spielberg, also wants to be an anti-war film, which is already hilarious. You have already hinted you at in the previous comment: Spielberg is not an intellectual, is not trained to deal with ideological problems of a certain complexity. Spielberg is a kid with a great visual imagination and moves very well in the field of entertainment, of drawing the strong emotional profiles and feelings of helplessness in areas like the fable ("AI"), science fiction ("encounters in the third stage") or the more Classicist melodrama ("the color purple"), to give examples.But certainly lacks sufficient maturity intellectual to know what is an anti-war film. The antibelicismo, in film, involves a cold and distant look to show us the nonsense and absurdity of war, emptying the space and the visual content of symbols, justifications and collective representations about the contest. And what makes Spielberg is just the opposite; you want to show the horror of the war, but not eyebrow in trying to convince us that everything has a justification, that there is a reward and a merit. Thus, input, "Saving private Ryan" shows the incoherence and superficiality of a child facing a speech before which does not have sufficient resources.The theme and history, look at the simplicity: we must save a soldier because sends it the Chief of the General staff (for the glory of patriotic heroes and their respective mamaítas) and you are responsible mission to another group of soldiers who spend the entire film wondering if it is worth sacrificing their lives for the life of a single soldier. Or what is the same, but changing the human reference framework, the question of whether is ethical and morally legitimate to kill one hundred men knowing that you are saving the lives of others many, either 200 or the computation of any Western defence civilization of which, a guess, the war was fought. Spielberg is positioned without blushing, manipulating the Viewer without any hint of subtlety; the conclusion is that any war or act of death is justifiable if done on behalf of certain institutional values and, above all, on behalf of the collective or individual humanity. In the individual case of the soldier Ryan, the sacrifice of John Miller (Tom Hanks) is a reason for Ryan justified the deaths of his companions with that of "tell me that I've been a good person". Spielberg used almost three hours to speak to us about these simplicities.Deserves the case highlight the bland and excessive footage, are nearly three hours for a very static development and too repetitive structure. This temporary space is completely untapped as its characters just evolve. See his central character, simply place a space journey, but his demeanor, his gestures and decisions - loaded with different nuances, as we shall see - are the same at the end than at the beginning. The side do not go to a filling, on the other hand, quite effective. This responds to the true nature of the film; an excuse for filming many scenes of action and that worldwide applaud the excellent virtues of Spielberg in the operation of the camera, angulation, the pace, the Mise en scène.In script, too often falls into a drama helpings and uncouth: as in the scene of the soldier who wants to take and protect the girl: "it reminds me of my niece".The speech is well-meaning, justified the war but expected that the war has served to a worthy end: because those men sacrificed their lives for our welfare and in defence of our style of life and enlightened values, at least, be good people. In the end.The speech is so pamphleteering, obvious and simplistic, ends up damaging the impeccable visual and technical Bill.However, we have a spectacular and bright, product with superb, but irregular moments as a whole. Best of the function, is undoubtedly his character protagonist, John Miller, a profile with a bitter and contradictory gesture at his disposal of military commander and human being protective and responsible for the security of their boys. During the film he is torn between the duty under the military code and feelings towards his pupils. There is a superb scene - probably the best, authentic luxury interpretive - reflecting the dimensionality of the character: after the death of one of his boys, immediate cause of their unnecessary commitment to cover ground according to a purely military target, we see Miller in solitude trying to suppress tears, struggling with himself with the human part of the military subject to a code of ethics. In this regard, Miller represents the complexity of a tormented character who plays two irreconcilable bands. It is John Miller, in short, the human profile that gives personality and versatility film to the film, the only one that truly takes back us to that classic taste of John Ford.En synthesis, saving private Ryan is not a great movie by Spielberg, it is a superfluous product, but yes it is a great visual spectacle and entertainment consumption easy mode adventure film with a speech followed American institutional dogmas.Don't enter to assess whether such institutional dogmas are good or evil, useful or ineffective, legitimate or illegitimate, fair or unfair (that is not our goal). What we are concerned and occupies is that Spielberg is limited to "copy" and incorporate them in a plain speech, with which many moviegoers will say - good reasons - that this film is an act of propaganda in 163 minutes.In the language of the film, the opening narration and the image that closes play a decisive role. Well, here begins with a map of the flag of the United States of America and ends with a map of the same flag. Hold it by where you can. |
2,867 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2901 | Jeremy Fox | El Club de los Suicidas | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Another worthy but failed sitcom the many coming to us each year. That Yes, I think that posts to see a failed comedy is better to see one made in Spain than one made in the USA, although only for supporting our industry. | Despite being one of the more complicated to deal with and that few times ago, comedy remains one of the most common film genres in our cinemas.This time the proposal comes from Spain and comes signed by Roberto Santiago (” happy men “, “ the longest penalty in the world “) on a script written by him along with Juan Vicente Pozuelo and Curro Royo.Por unfortunately, not on this occasion the result is satisfactory.The plot premise of “ club of suicide ” is the most interesting, although credit should be attributed to Robert Louis Stevenson, author of the “ self-titled debut collection of short stories ” from which the writers extracted the central idea: a group of people without value to commit suicide decided to found a club that play every week who is who kills another Member and who is that dies.One of the problems is that the film does not end exploit the comic possibilities of such a premise, focusing more on making this kind of jokes “ style comedy television ”, which unfortunately fashion are in our cinema. In fact, does not end define openly as a comedy “ of the of stalks are ” and, occasionally, opt for a darker tone that not curdled altogether.The result produces a clear mismatch between the comic moments and the dramatic addition, nor are so comical or as dramatic as it would be desirable.The players trying to save the function but just do. Fernando Tejero, possibly capable of larger companies, needs a change of urgent registration because I see pigeonholing forever in the same role while making Lucía Jiménez, again, of morbidly attractive woman which, in his case, has no excessive merit.Ultimately another worthy but failed comedy of many coming to us each year. That Yes, I think that posts to see a failed comedy is better to see one made in Spain than one made in the USA, although only for supporting our industry. |
2,868 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/142 | Raccord | Azuloscurocasinegro | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Comparisons are odious, but I liked it much more than?Do again? Almodóvar | "Dark blue, CasiNegro" is the directorial debut of Madrid director Daniel Sánchez Arévalo, known and award-winning short films. Despite being a "small" film without a big budget, nor a spectacular cast, won several Golden Biznagas at the recent Festival de Málaga (included in the special prize of the jury). Despite having a so horrifyingly bad title, and a poster of those that you never fijarías has caused a phenomenon mouth quite considerable, especially in the blogosphere, which prompted me to see her. And I did not disappoint at all. I know that comparisons are odious, but I liked pretty rather than "Volver" Almodovar, which competed directly on the Bulletin Board in recent weeks. A film that breathes freshness and talent, in these times in which does not seem that we are good of these qualities in Spain (if not I think, look at those who were winners in the Goya).Jorge (Quim Gutierrez) is a block of apartments goalkeeper, employment he inherited from his father, when he contracted Alzheimer's. He is a young boy and with willpower (Tamagotchi business career, while caring for his father, and his work in the goal) but lives in a world without opportunities to achieve a better life. His girlfriend is in Germany studying, and his brother in prison; so it only can share their sorrows with his friend Israel (Raúl Arévalo). But one day, Antonio (Antonio de la Torre), his brother, released from prison, and tells him that she has met a girl very special in the theater in the prison workshop. Jorge has to do a very important favor to that girl, that can save your life.Coldly analyzing, neither the plot nor the dialogues are very achieved, but the film follows truth; as if these stories they had been passed to your neighbors, and your not having apercibido. In addition, the characters are very well characterized and their motivations are embodied with a lot of tenderness and sense of humor. It has a couple of really exciting moments, along with others that cause a lot of laughs. The soundtrack for Pascal Gaigne is also much higher than the average. Very good film, but with the feeling that if this director/screenwriter continues to film, "Do dark blue?" will not be far the best of his career. To see if other than your also going to see it. A great movie. |
2,869 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1080 | Caruco | Luces al atardecer | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Rarely a makeshift vase with Rose had been so melancholy or the smoke of a cigarette so eloquently: minimum resources, maximum expressiveness. | The best photography, is to close the year 2006, of the new film by the Finnish sinpar Aki Kaurismäki. It is both technically and for its content. By its chromaticism of saturated colors, fascinating!, in a design that combines hypnotic way; and by its decor, attentive both to what is happening in the frame as to what is outside, and always at the service of its history.When night comes, Helsinki lights begin to illuminate, and in the urban space, cold, almost desert, also begins to take its first steps the persevering main character, Koistinen (Janne Hyytïainen), a watchman of security which, day to day, also must drag behind him with three of their curses: his solitude, the impossible dreams and the fact that seems to attract only the contempt or indifference of all who surround him.Ice cream outside, burning inside.Koistinen is a loser with a capital, a bug that is rare in the eyes of others without any reason. One of his superiors, even though that has been years in the service, is still unable to remember his name, the ringleader of the seguratas group is mania, and Koistinen is the kind capable of reaching a bar to flirt and achieve, in record time, a blonde to separate him or that, to cornering, give with a smack in the face to open the door of the services.It is impressive the amount of close-ups of characters who look to him with disdain, as well as the number of hits this resigned autobiographical must fit with stoic rigidity, but that he will be leaving proof of honesty and idealism of his spirit.And more amazing is still asistitir to this recital of absolutely hieratic, impassive performances. The actors are as deadpan statuary. They can feel fear, hatred, anger or love, without his face inmute in the slightest. When they speak, sparing in words, is to go straight to the grain will contrast the Nordic with, for example, the Latins, as given the excesses! Do Kaurismäki? forever?.Do do do do images cobrán life to the sound of the voice of Carlos Gardel and "Return" and will be closed to the beat of another tango, "El día que me quieras", having gone to pure cinema is melodrama, comedy and? noir?, with a? femme fatale? blonde, Mirja (Maria Järvenhelmi), the mistress of a gangster; and another brunette, Aila (Maria Heiskanen), shaped from selling sausages and perhaps the only light of hope.Do with the? plus? added that it possesses extraordinary moments. Plenty to discover each one, but it is impossible to not highlight two scenes? off field?, the from the beating received by trying to help a dog; and the ellipsis that is generated to be an empty armchair, when the explosive Mirja gets up to go to the sexual call of his Machiavellian lover. To me like her would place "A man without a past", after the great or very good "lives of bohemia" and "The girl in the factory of matches"; but the same level of "Passing clouds". With all share that attraction to beings who live with their pain and quiet solitude. And a mise en scene that leaves us speechless. Rarely a makeshift vase with Rose had been so melancholy or the smoke of a cigarette so eloquently: minimum resources, maximum expressiveness. And your footage even reaches the hour and a quarter. |
2,870 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3006 | José A. Peig | Un tranvía llamado deseo | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Superb photography in black and white is the perfect medium to visualize a world whose lights and shadows appear to reflect the State of mind of Blanche, character that encompasses sadness and hope, represented in the dark corners of the home that uses to hide their truth or sporadic moments of lucidity. | Elia Kazan, faithful transcription of the work of Tennessee Williams film, has a female soul which becomes real thematic axis in a story that goes beyond its appearance of melodrama about life as a couple, which is only a collateral subject to the furious and multifaceted female expression that contains in its great momentsfocused from the first images in which we see Blanche DuBois (Vivian Leigh) to appear between the sinister smoke surrounding in the platform of the New Orleans station, until the conclusion of the film material, accompanied by a psychiatrist who offers you the security of understanding and cordial gesture before a soul that seeks to sensitivity to the rudeness and chaos prevailing in the suburb. His past is so foggy and cloudy as the smoke that comes into the story, equivalent to the March to madness by deception.Hypersensitive, jovial and manipulative, Blanche is the element that stimulates keys, because it is a character whose gestures and words range from the more sensible sanity to child daydreaming that leads her to weave a network of deception and autoengaños that at the end, she, and only she, will be the victim. Throughout the story, behind the impulse which refers to the struggle between femininity and masculinity. If Blanche represents the idea of femininity taken to its extreme vulnerable and unbalanced, the character known as Stanley Kowalski (iconic and immeasurable Marlon Brando) provides a counterpoint of rude and insensitive masculinity.The duel of tensión-contención between the two is the real drama of a primarily descriptive film of a situation in progress, that, in the last section, the tensión-contención State transmutes in another action in a physical and verbal confrontation with clear sexual connotations which until then remained implicit in the subtext. The confrontation culminates with the violent expressiveness of a mirror broken, a female alma rota figuration and bound to its self-destruction in the hands of the verdugo testosterónico.Superb photography in black and white is the perfect medium to visualize a world whose lights and shadows appear to reflect the State of mind of Blanche, character that encompasses sadness and hope, represented in the dark corners of the household that used to hide the truth or the sporadic moments of lucidity (often exalted) are its visual reference in a small yellow light the night or lighting his face first flat, an Impressionist that synthesizes and produces rhythms of the image in line with the contrasts between truth and lies, past and present, reality and pretense, male and female. |
2,871 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2006 | Oscar Cantero | El retorno de los malditos | 1 | 5 | muchocine | One more argument for those who think that second parts were never good. It is very bad, but honestly bad. Without subterfuge. | Although that second parts were never good sounds like a topic and there are many continuations better than its predecessors, the truth is that generally do usually have a decline in quality as the sagas accumulate titles.The return of the damned meets this maxim to letter, and if we take into account that the film that comes, the hills have eyes, is of itself a crappy, because you can already imagine the magnitude of the offense to the seventh art that involves this aberration. The truth is that little more could be expected of Wes Craven, outdated and repeated endlessly, with a monumental creative resources shortage and an obsession with death bloody and viscous that clears the psychotic. In this case, the punishment begins with an expedition of members of the U.S. National Guard, heading to make a delivery of material to a New Mexico research camp. When they arrive, they find that there is not a soul there, but to go to search for them on the hills that surround, they start out mutants man-eaters. That is all. The distribution, as it is normally the case in these wastes, is a group of semidesconocidos (anyone who has a minimum of prestige would star in such nonsense). In any case, we must be clear that films of this subgenre are basically aimed at a teenage audience that seeks only to spend a fun with friends while on the Saturday evening. Why it must be said in his defence that is produced without pretensions, that it does not try to pretend it is not nor falls into the temptation of moralistic message. It is very bad, but honestly bad. Without subterfuge. |
2,872 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2683 | Bruji | El perfume | 2 | 5 | muchocine | There was only a filmmaker who could uncover the essence of that fragrance that inspired a song by Nirvana. | 'Perfume' is the film that turns verbs "read" and "see" in antonyms, and surprising novel that many found in our adolescence, in a Plantigrade tale: dull, sticky, tedious, annoying...The names of five directors who know approaching history to convey to the viewer the concern and anxiety that off your pages could mention, at least. Even so, no mistake. There was only a filmmaker who could uncover the essence of that fragrance that inspired a song by Nirvana.Si you want to speak well of the Perfume, we have to confine ourselves to observe the art direction is appropriate; the setting of the 18th century and narrated in the novel, the correct; and the production, the right design. However, if you decide to delve into the essence of the story who was fascinated by half the world in 1985, soon it becomes convinced that the chosen approach could not have been worse. Does fails on three fundamental elements: the measurement of time, the proposal of casting, and in the most unforgivable: the structure of the script, which becomes an evil plagiarism of?Amelie?.With all these ingredients, can you develop a good perfume? The history of cinema flatly replied us no, and it reminds us of the extreme case where a technically perfect film gave the fret with the prevailing system of education in Hollywood, because of an inconsistent hyphen (rebellion aboard, to the 1,962). Long before, John Huston, with his directorial debut, had shown that the primary basis of a good movie is a good script. The Maltese Falcon, in fact, is based on a best seller that other filmmakers had failed.In general, there are too many cases in which renowned Directors did not finish convince address literary projects. Happened to Brian de Palma with the bonfire of the vanities, to Roman Polanski with Oliver Twist, even to Coppola, to include a love story that was never in the mood of Mina Harker or emerged from the pen of Stoker. But there was also a genius who knew how to liberate the words to transform them into images, even if it meant having to invent a new narrative structure in cinema. It happened in Lolita.Esa genius is not in the collaboration formed by Tom Tykwer and Andrew Birkin.Tykwer not has adapted the novel to the screen, but to their own possibilities as director. In this way, it recreates in sniff the first victim to show his virtuosity behind the camera. Now, a close-up showing the technique for drying flowers. Now, a framing retailer of the cross that leads to the neck Laura. Later, she flits through the fields of lavender, and ends crossing at breakneck speed to narrate a nasal Chase, in which copied some scenes of the worst movie of Ang Lee. That in which Hulk goes jumping by the mountains which graceful mariposilla.With this auto-contemplación, has managed, as well as a wasteful footage, simply despise the time of drafting. Do remember that the choice of the twelve fragrances? moments summits in the original story - is reduced to a blow on the head (to eleven, in particular).Say experts that director mission involves not only properly placing cameras, but that he is alone, at all times, have a global vision of the film. Here, Mr. Tykwer overlooked one important fact: the pages of that book emanated aromas.Birkin managed to succeed to adapt the name of the rose, that took the precaution of focus the script on the detective plot and flee from the philosophical conclusions of Umberto Eco. More in the Perfume, it has committed the most serious mistake of going from one extreme to another, without realizing the virtue of moderation. On the one hand, literally adapting the novel and the voiceover plays full paragraphs of history, making the film especially tedious. But, on the other hand, is obviate many descriptions, so you get blur the central characters. It has nothing to do "being great and abominable, comparable to Napoleon, grotesque, deformed and repulsive in the eyes of women" who created Süskind with the physical attractiveness of the British actor who gives life.And it is that the topic is more than clear. This role was always for actor John Hurt, the Narrator, and the film for Stanley Kubrick.Al out of the film, came to several conclusions. The idea that a Europe that shoots together, stays together, find me moving. The hiring of La Fura dels Baus, a great success. The high technical quality of this tape, an aspect of the subject to the popular theories of relativity or, better said, the comparison. And, although I admit that it sounds like glory of the "new German cinema", the assertion that Tom Tykwer has managed to adapt this novel with brilliance, seems me far-fetched.Mental straws in film, there should be the fair and, if possible, that they are well done. Managers who want to experiment, can always do so by telling their own stories, which screened before a small group of intellectuals, those who worship what you do not understand and call "transgression" which is not more than mere stupidity.Fortunately, there is always who note that the emperor was naked. |
2,873 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3238 | José A. Peig | Cuando el destino nos alcance | 4 | 5 | muchocine | If science fiction is a genre that allows exploring the concerns of mankind on a global scale, Soylent Green is an immortal piece directed by Richard Fleischer with sobriety. | Science fiction in the service of an apocalyptic thriller that plays with three basic ideas of great current relevance: climate change, overpopulation, and the monopoly of resources by a minority business. The permanence of his subjects, in reference to sociology and our present globalized consumption, is one of its core values, despite being a film designed on the basis of the emerging early 1970s environmentalism. If science fiction is a genre that allows exploring the concerns of mankind on a global scale, Soylent Green is an immortal piece directed by Richard Fleischer with sobriety. A solvent story that exposes a detective plot in an apocalyptic environment, thus comes to be a clear precedent of masterpieces such as Blade Runner, though, that Yes, the work of Fleischer not advantage the theme and setting of form so suggestive, as happens in the film by Ridley Scott. more than exploration and socio-economic reflectionthe film is his soul in the described relationship around the characters played by two icons of the cinema Hollywood and Charlton Heston, Edward g. Robinson, each of them representative of two times separated by a gap of destruction and imbalances on a planetary scale, which gives rise to an effective drama of opposites. Drama which is a sensible resolution at the time in which the central character shares the beauty of the old world with the old Sun, the last fraternal bond between two generations separated by time and cultural decline, being the old man the true driver of the great final revelation, a macabre idea that comes to be a picture of the situation in our days: even metaphorically, we are cattle of corporations that use our lives and our consciences for the benefit of the few. According to the heartbreaking final cry of a dying Charlton Heston, we also can say that our current state is maintained with the death of human beings living in the areas related to what we call "third world", since the death of ones - in a context of overpopulation and knowing that the planet has limited resources - allows that the minority of the rich world can continue to enjoy their privileges.As a result, the film hides a macabre allegory of the current situation. Replace "human corpses" by the benefit won by every human being condemned to die of starvation. Perhaps we need a voice to show us clearly that our system feeds on death. But it is also true, we tend to think that the planet has sufficient resources to supply the entire population, which is not true, or at least, not everyone could enjoy the standard of living in the so-called "welfare society". The film also focuses on this aspect to show how food quality and the only luxury are within reach of a few. |
2,874 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/378 | Vsancha | Alatriste | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Alatriste is one of the saddest shows that one has seen in a movie theater. A heavy, very long and very expensive joke. At least now they may not say that that if money and media could do good cinema. | It is this something more than any premiere, days before, you can check with the news connecting live at the door of the cinema to see that you going there, the "President" of the Government and other authorities going to see the movie. And above all it shows when one goes to the movies and above is the premiere, isn't one film, there you find all kinds of viewers, fans of the books, making a truncheon on his favorite character, that moments before those we have seen in the section of literature of the same mall chatting about them. Do you can find even a "famous" local journalist, normal people who go alone, as a couple, with friends, in family with grandparents, grandchildren? There there is nobody. No one wanted to lose the umpteenth attempt to Spanish film.It had prepared the critique of "The girl in the water" but seeing what I saw last night I I could not resist to outline which is the most expensive movie in the history of the Spanish cinema. Alatriste is nonsense from beginning to end, without any kind of storyline, where witness scenes one after other, by which worst shot, and by which they appear, a long cast of well-known interpreters Spanish, and there has been great part of the grace of the film, see that actors make it worse. And in the meantime loose mamarracho and although the election has been difficult, the worst has been Eduardo Noriega that follows, and is not the only one, with its serious problem of diction, not be as pussy manages delivers it all the same uncle, but the funny thing is when we see his statements in the press conference of presentation of this disturbing filmin which she said that to know that his character had few words he decided to try to express it through its presence, its forms, and that it were these factors which define. A port and an expressiveness that has Eduardo or Marlon Brando.Eduardo has had stiff competition with Unax Ugalde, the poor, not be who will be told what actor. If I even putting desire he performed better. We also, I could not miss, free nude, appearing in every movie Spanish who boasts, this time by Elena Anaya which is to be welcomed. A chapter apart deserves the performance of Viggo Mortensen, whose election deal to portray Captain Alatriste seems very misguided, only understandable by marketing as claim abroad, the poor try but the character does not transmit a shit, not to create or him, he looks very content to Taming their Argentine accent, and at times, everytime I get on screenIt seems that he is drunk when he speaks. It was really unfortunate, more of one laugh managed to boot the spectators sitting in the Hall, that when understand you clearly is. Not be that work would have cost to bend him because his performance is really diminished by their accent, which makes it quite unnatural.The address is not that it is bad, is that it is non-existent, you need something more than personality behind a camera for a production of this caliber, what did Agustín Díaz Yanes, it seems that he has shot a trailer for 2 hours. A soundtrack of penalty, this soundtrack that seems you've already heard before in thousand movies, while above this very poorly integrated, many scenes where missing and others where spare. The battles are of penalty, there are No specialists in Spain?, but battles are those with four cats and very bad shot. And the picture, without being bad, comes to tire with both painting by Velázquez and both still life. To all this, already half of footage, you look for the thirtieth time clockwise and you think it cannot be, you think that you have stopped the clock, you take away and you save it to not suffer more.Both Alatriste is one of the saddest shows that one has seen in a movie theater. And it makes you ask me the reason for both compliment between the author of the work, Arturo Pérez Reverte, and responsible for "directing" this monstrosity, Agustín Díaz Yanes, and can only respond to a communion of interests. Alatriste is a heavy, very long and very expensive joke. At least now they may not say that that if money and media could do good cinema. Show. |
2,875 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1083 | Kiko de España | Banderas de nuestros padres | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Boredom. That is the word that defines the first serious tropezón master Clint when I finish see flags of our fathers. | Boredom. That is the word that defines the first tropezón serious master Clint (blood was also a bit bland, but is this above pretentious) when I watch flags of our fathers. Where do I start?The film has a structure of loop and the same three scenes repeated incessantly during the two (long) hours of footage.First we have a flashback of the battlefield, then a scene of Office and then a scene of sports field. And so the film is passed.Then there are the actors that have charisma or excited, especially Adam Beach, regrettable, that achieves that Ryan Phillippe seem actor. The side go out there, and we find Paul Walter or Barry Pepper, (the latter seems just out of saving private Ryan) or with Billy Elliot reprising his role of King Kong. The music is as repetitive as the structure of the narrative, i.e. also bored and comes to tire. The history is quite bland and trilladísima. Positive it? The war sequences, superbly treated and shot with overwhelming classicism. I will see the letters from Iwo Jima, because it can not be more boring than this. |
2,876 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3059 | Ramón Balcells | Sin reservas | 3 | 5 | muchocine | This romantic comedy-drama is a cocktail very well mixed in the sense that combines several genres of right way and is able to keep the pace (almost) anytime. | I did not see delicious Martha, the acclaimed German film Director Sandra Nettelbeck. Moreover, he had never heard of this film until that Hicks decided to make its American remake. He painted as a dish without salt, an americanada to all rule without a shred of originality. But the truth is that the director of Shine, has made unreservedly an appetizing dish with a more aromatic than that acid taste. Its chef, a correct Catherine Zeta-Jones, presents, in the beginning, the film as a melodrama with culinary dyes. And it is the beginning of the film is its best and tasty dish, a starter made with grace and enough originality. Then, after the introduction of the small Abigail Breslin (unforgettable in little Miss Sunshine), the film becomes a family drama that later, the spectator (rather the spectator) sits attracted / by Aaron Eckhart, in her first scene (only), little right. Maybe the tape is, without a doubt, the talent of the young Breslin, without too many efforts you eat (never better said) to the two protagonists, and not so young, they make that his work is a seemingly senzillo effort to pretend to be more dramatic than usual, more credible (Zeta in particular, the Miss Jones). No, aren't bad, but the girl debora as the delicious spaghetti zampa in a scene. A story at times comic, dramatic moments, other unconvincing and, in general, very correct. Does not exceed, but it won't either below mediocrity; It simply is what it purports to be, virtually no manipulative emotionally. This is appreciated, as well as the brilliant score of an already formidable Philip Glass (touching the main theme), an accompaniment of five stars. Although this unqualified has one weak point, and I think that considerably large: the two sides of the story (the girl and the romantic) do not know merged correctly, because when the writer deviates to one, the other forget about (usually of Breslin leave more secluded and forgotten it). And then when you do not know if what he wants to tell you exactly is a love story between two chefs or responsibility for a woman, until now alone, perfectionist and cold, before the appearance of his niece who has just run out of mother. But above all, this romantic comedy-drama is a cocktail very well mixed in the sense that combines several genres of right way and is able to keep the pace (almost) anytime. And finally, a plate (plane, forgiveness) end of a delicacy rarely seen. |
2,877 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1232 | Yojimbo | Dicen por ahi | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Rob Reiner a loose script makes a good address, print good pace and can take good gags to the screen. | See the Friday evening in good company Rumor has it (say), with Jennifer Aniston, Kevin Costner, Mark Ruffalo, Shirley MacLaine, Mena Suvari, Richard Jenkins? is that everytime you think? What a cast!Well, taking as premise the rumors that part of the family of Sarah (Aniston) is the portrayed in the book and film entitled the graduate, the protagonist will try by all means find the answer to a question that puts the lace to many suspicions about his family.Jennifer, as well one of my co-visionadores of the film, defined in this film is very much like the characters Meg Ryan had certain comedies as French Kiss, i.e. something hysterical but nothing burdensome, but rather funny. It does not fall in the overacting at all. In fact it is confirmed as a wonderful actress. And she is the best claim to this film. A_el_final_de this post you will find links to other actresses who have made their films a true vehicle for showcasing personal:) and professional.Then it appears, to the surprise of many, Shirley MacLaine, stretched and fairly recognizable but doing a role to suit and how not, with great talent. Kevin Costner repeats in a role somewhat similar to beyond hatred. It is "reborn" and winning integers to return with a great product in the near future (and I do not mean that helicopters of which you can see the trailer): P. His character, apart from being the typical adorable for the female audience, is the most damaged by the script and the characters, leaving him with a reputation and a totally unjust situation for him, but that bad of a loose script? you let loose.Rob Reiner a loose script makes a good address, print good pace and can take good gags to the screen. Also with this incredible cast and some that another phrase memorable for the always memorable Richard Jenkins.Entretenida and decent. |
2,878 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3259 | Kiko de España | Supersalidos | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Superbad is a Superbonita movie disguised as a movie Supergamberra and a beautiful and bitter (at the bottom) singing to the friendship. Pity the Castilian dubbing, Superbad of truth. A peliculón which will be even more when you understand what kids are saying. | First test of maturity.Superbad is a bitter hymn to friendship in form of wild comedy. Superbad is a movie about friends that will soon no longer be despite the affection felt between them. Superbad is a superbonita movie supergamberra movie dressed up as. The good that has is that it is also, as said the great Noel, Superbuena.Tres so charismatic and endearing actors that it is difficult to stay with one, good intentions and perhaps the weakest of all, the usual unwillingness in the composition and the absence of brilliantly filmed moments. But that's brand of the House and the key, as in Virgin at 40 or Knocked up is in the script.Say the own writers that the movie was conceived at the same time that live the protagonists of the film, perhaps that is why there are quite honesty in the movie and we have no nude girls retozando by bedding: nobody here eats a tail.Way wrong but inevitable is compares it with American Pie, which was honest and sincere that she had John McTiernan.Superbad 2002 Rollerball "goes" some kids who have to drink for the holidays "cole" and how difficult it is to achieve in this country according to which things. This simple anecdote serves to ensure that the three guys (wax will be the great Dominator of the future together with Shia, Hill is meat of coarse comedy and Mintz-Plasse do not say anything ) discover that maybe is not that what they really want the progress despite inevitably go in a new direction.The police bring a "new comedy within comedy" thank God, and have one of the best quotes from the movie, which explains that once they stopped at a rate that was called.The other great sentence is McLovin (!) with a drunk.Seth Rogen is one of the writers of the movie, the COP with moustache, the prota of Knocked up and the great revelation of Virgin at 40. All these movies have grossed more than $ 100,000,000 and shows that sometimes the general public isn't stupid.Pity the Castilian dubbing: crappy, pseudoamateur and ultraridículo.A peliculón that will become even bigger when you understand what the players are saying. |
2,879 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2093 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | El último escalón | 4 | 5 | muchocine | One of the best films of recent times fear. The genus has been given so many masterpieces which we must make do with correct products like this, fed from a deep respect to patterns where escarba. Hopefully come many like this. Fans, many of us, Miss them between such pigswill. | The last step is based on a short story by Richard Matheson is an absolute guarantee: the incredible shrinking man or I am legend are books of header for any fan to the fantastic of the 20th century. Comparable to the overrated Ray Bradbury, although most contaminated by mass culture industry. David Koepp, screenwriter for Jurassic Park, behind the news, the room of panic or Spider-man, and director of the domino effect or secret window adapts Stir of echoes, a tale about ghosts, although here are not interested in the abrupt effects handled based on loose book blows. Koepp prefers to ask what limits exist between the supernatural and the everyday, what doors connect both world and what people have enough sensitivity to see those doors and perceived interference by one world in another. They come to the head the others or the sixth sense, great tapes that they command similar reflections. Unlike these, the final step prefers a more minimalist, exempt from the usual paraphernalia of the genus tone. It is the terror so spent, there has been so much dementia in the exploitation of well contrasted patterns, machines of make money, which you escaman to a certain arguementos. Escuecen you so many ghosts wandering around there. Mutilated children calling for revenge. Women average rot that fatigue corridors of Gothic mansions on the outskirts of some industrial city. Starts one and not for. The list of films that obey this call fills an encyclopedia. The final step (abominable translation from Stir of echoes, stir of echoes) attends material well known for the genre fan, but respectfully, without squeezing the topics up the same parody of. Fred Murphy photography gives an ocher tone, rusted, very consistent to articulate the madness that Tom (splendid Kevin Bacon) believes brow after leaving make in a session of hypnosis, cause then their terrifying visions.There is scare: fear well filmed, without falling into acuchillantes music that tear the silent veil of air. Own spectrum of the teenager claiming, from limbo, justice, although now the Church ande redefining all this trash words with which it has subjected the will of his fascinated membership for two millennia, was selected in a rigorous casting because they were looking for a girl to walk very slowly or knew walk very slowly with harmony unless it never appeared that it was still. That or save it at six frames per second appearing, in the words of the director himself, "the actress gave a frog like jaunty". The suspense is gradual: murder behind the visions of Tom is settling in the plot with delinquent slowness. One movie more than interesting, well above the average of tapes with arguments sewn to it. Everything is written, everything is published: the viewer has already stopped looking for news in the cinema that sees. You prefer to sell you stories that you already know, but ingenien to them so that they appear, what madness, new. Only this commotion of voices, this echo of dead, is therefore a great film |
2,880 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3716 | Rafa Ferrer | Antes del atardecer | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Strange conversations, smell of summer, smiles, caresses, kisses... A moment to remember that you don't want to ever escape of fleeting glances of brief moments, accompanied by laughter, gimmicky conversations, gestures. | I find it difficult after seeing this film analyzing with coldness, although it would be easy, it is at the same time an exercise which seems to me difficult, let's see, this that analyze these fleeting love, on the one hand people that she pass by your life of obliquely and perhaps, if the destination (curious paradox) would have put them more time (corrido) in your life, perhaps everything would now be different, warm, sincere, people of those with which the mere fact of a coffee on a terrace and share a few minutes of supposed banality leave a huge mark on your interior, sweet moments, that as Ethan Hawke says in the film, remember better than many of your best moments of life.Strange conversations, smell of summer, smiles, caresses, kisses. A moment to remember that you don't want to ever escape of fleeting glances of brief moments, accompanied by laughter, gimmicky conversations, gestures. A lifetime precipitated in a "brief encounter".It is difficult to talk about an hour and twenty projection that leaves a footprint, which although it is easily removable in one fell swoop, the brand there is in you. A great film, that while suffers from an open ending is open? Cone, abiertísimo! Let "I posed" (as usually say from time to time). Especially recommended for all the "hardened romantic" for all those who enjoyed an afternoon of a morning, a few hours of their time accompanied by someone already not this beside her (and you go to knowing where to walk.)Richard Linklater magnifico in the direction, photography perfectly Paris, the city of love, tremendous Hanke and Delpy, in fact sometimes look to the face does not need to see the words how in a simple movie can exist as much magic?In short, without a doubt. You have to see it! |
2,881 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3481 | Oscar Cantero | Operación Stormbreaker | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Mediocrity, shortage of British ideas and nonsense; three in one for a decadent film that still imitating everything bad in their American Masters. | I have always defended the European cinema to the American for several reasons. The first, and more weight, is that I sincerely believe that it is much more deep and full of ideas that the Hollywood; and second, because I recognise that I am of those who is proud of its roots and firmly believe that the fact of being the most civilised continent should be noted in all cultural manifestation.Unfortunately, on many occasions I find films which have been built without any basis, drawing on the topics that are rotting American cinema and only seeking, legitimately, that Yes, the box office and the carefree Viewer that not look further than a couple of hours of vacuous entertainment.It is the case of Alex Raider, an absurd pseudoinfantil history of spies, with little argument, absurd and uncouth winks to the cheap comedy and without more pretensions that parody the classic British stories of spies and action. Honestly, I don't think that a film can thus conceive rather than as a simple mockery of Fleming, Fortsyth or Le Carré novels. It is clear, especially in the beginning, the parallel with James Bond, especially in the scene of the car.Testimonial the appearance of Ewan Mc Gregor and repellent and hateful over not being able to the repugnant protagonist Alex Pettyfer.Pobreza, mediocrity and vulgarity. Three in one for this pilonga chestnut that has crossed the English channel to bore up to the stones. |
2,882 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2895 | Rafa Ferrer | La hora fría | 4 | 5 | muchocine | A good proposal for a fantasy film, which, coming of Spain us adventure, custom Elio Quiroga, something interesting and guidelines which could be marked or continue in the future. | I do not know very well by that reason, me I striving in the press pass was completely different elsewhere, so after 15 minutes. waiting in the center of Madrid as a "pazguato" and FRY to SMS to the webmaster of muchocine.net (which is ultimately who allows us to go to these "pass Peacho") have finished learning me (thanks Quetzal) where noses was the pass, so there I was completely delocalised to Madrid, looking like pieces of Spain reach Bravo Murillo in just 15 minutes. (taxiiii!), luckily the great Spain Kiko I was waiting to take me to the movies (blessed who invented the mobile and viva the mother who bore), well, after this stuff than anything has to do with the opinion, but that remains of wonder in this, my blog, we are going to the mess: sincerely I had certain reservations concerning this film, I don't know why whyproduced me the feeling of unease that I produced something so regrettable as "More than a thousand cameras." (now I promise not to prejudge Spanish horror movies) and at the beginning of the film, one hoped that sooner or later are they involved in "flour", which, if the tape has a downside is the slowness with which develop the events and the first initial confusion; Once the presentation of characters and the explanation of the whole plot is much more easy to understand and digest.Interpretive level stress Silke (which this time not teach the breasts), Jorge Casalduero and July Perillán (the latter has kindly come to discuss the film with us just end the projection), is true that Perillán this completely unknown, with a beard, glasses and extremely thin and light years of as he is in person, quite serious and enigmatic Silke and Jorge Casalduero (I've been thinking their similarity of much of the footage) (with Fran Perea), also the young Nadia de Santiago ("Alatriste") other than me I pulled much of the footage trying to know where noses had seen before.Elio Quiroga consists a dark tape, who plays the dismissal with the Viewer, that manages to put the bad feeling in the body almost from the first minute, which uses not the typical topics of always, and where appear from the bugs (brilliantly recreated digitally) to zombies, though neither film is bugs, or zombies, but they are both a mere excuse plot for a tape that just giving you a punch in the stomach of the spectator.I admit, and I have to say with some embarrassment, that expected another kind of end, more light, more than trumpeting, oops, more Hollywood, I found with a finish that partly and as I have already said hits (within the fantasy genre sci-fi) awareness of the patio of armchairs.In short, that I do not want to lengthen too, a good proposal for a fantasy film, which, coming of Spain us adventure, custom Elio Quiroga, something interesting and guidelines which could be marked or continue in the future. |
2,883 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2060 | JLO | El Motorista Fantasma (Ghost Rider) | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Criticism shattered and the box office are burning, i.e. already scheduled the sequel for 2009 which will be more action as already presented the character. | Class B the Marvel character. Nicolas Cage desperate for portraying a superhero, after what they ningunearan with Superman. Director of the not very well-received Daredevil, Mark Steven Johnson. In other words, this painted for a total fiasco.But it wasn't like that. Lejísimos masterpieces of the comic as Batman Returns or Spider-man 2, Hellboy, Ghost Rider is another good adaptation of the famous comics, Daredevil sister by its rhythm and Cadence, and relies on an attractive story featuring a character with special characteristics. Above attempts such as Elektra, Hulk and some other more.This cool motoquero Ghost has its good things. With cyber western wave, its 110 minutes pass quite fast despite the fact that the special effects are simple, not as it is customary in this genre and its waste.I.e., they are not the big thing but they meet. Lack of budget? Likely. Unknown Eva Mendez is another Latin which is for murder, the bike is impressive, the character transformations are very successful and Peter Fonda as the devil zafa. Up there just.Criticism shattered and the box office are burning, i.e. already scheduled the sequel for 2009 which will be more action as already presented the character.Now a thing: Nicolas Cage sobreactúa all the time for a change, still as heavy as usual and that ugly toupee! please |
2,884 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/911 | Yul B. | El camino de los ingleses | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The visual and sound aspect of the film is dominated by overwhelming. It is a paranoia of Antonio Banderas, in the best sense of the word. | To understand and appreciate this film it is essential to go to the movies before knowing the following:?The camino de los ingleses? It is a paranoia of Antonio Banderas, in the best sense of the word. Paranoia caused by the writer and writer of the novel inspiring, Antonio Soler, by cinematographer Xavi Giménez, and by the composer of the soundtrack Antonio Meliveo.La Union of the work of all of them, with flags at the head, has resulted in a feature film of author, unconventional, and some surreal moments.If this detail is known in advance, the tape is seen from another perspective, with a different chip, and is judged better.Therefore, on the basis that we have a completely atypical film product, my assessment sobre?The camino de los ingleses? It is positive.The malagueño director/actor has been able to relate in unusual way, apart from the prevailing formalism in the film of our days, but in an attractive manner, the first loves, lusts and obsessions of a group of four friends - Miguelito (Alberto Amarilla), Babirosa (Raúl Arévalo), Paco Frontón (Félix Gómez) and Moratalla (Mario Casas) - during a summer vacation in the city of Malaga (Spain) of late 70.El visual and sound aspect of the film is predominant way crushing on tells the story. This is its hallmark: almost everything you see on screen is a game of colors, lights and textures, led with unusual, often short and intentionally descuadrados levels with no pattern camera movements and angles already forgotten in the current film.The continuous background music and the voiceover of a fifth friend,? the throat? (Fran Perea), poetic Narrator mode, gave the film a melancholic atmosphere appropriate to the dramatic touch that gives the lives of the Group of friends and their environment.On the other hand, the sexual component of this film is intense. Do however, is treated without chabacanería or Visual vulgarity (Word are inevitable), with? elegance? and an unusual artistic carefully in this field.With regard to the selected main cast, a success to one hundred percent. None of them at odds.Alberto Amarilla outboard the role of Miguelito. Do to my gone this grating image that had him for its portrayal of Rafa in the series?My lovely neighbors?. The rest of the group, Raul Arevalo (the more pirao, lover of Bruce Lee), Félix Gómez (posh) and Mario (left) houses, not get left behind. Fran Perea, unrecognizable, takes off his stigma of television product. With regard to the women's campus, it is explosive, sensual and savagely beautiful. María Ruiz (Luli), the girl in Miguelito, is a discovery; remember his name because we will often see in our cinema; and so far as Marta Nieto (the body), does honour to his nickname in the film.For veterans, Victoria Abril and Juan Diego fit short. Online its outstanding common (although Juan Diego prodigue shortly).Does the climax of the above signed the own flags to describe in a recent promotion granted to Spanish film magazine interview?Do Cinemanía?, and collected in this month of December's issue special supplement, what were its claims to the shoot?The camino de los ingleses?: "with this film did not want half measures nor save his own skin." "I know that me I played, but I managed to put my dreams on the screen".Do luck, because this film complies perfectly with the topic of? or you like or hate her?. It is the only conventional, that can be attributed. |
2,885 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1521 | Yojimbo | Días de cine | 1 | 5 | muchocine | In an effort to be? cool? do not realize that criticize everything you have done so far: the other side of the bed, days of soccer and the two sides of the bed. | This new film from the factory Telespan and David Serrano intends to make the film the main theme of this film. But the film of the 1970s. More specifically the year 77. And of course, tell me as it happened has created a style that marks both these "nostalgic" productions and the landing of Normandy Spielberg later war production. Only that in the latter case, the message is clear and acceptable.Federico Solá (Alberto San Juan) wants to direct his first screenplay in film. The producer, José María Culebras (Miguel Rellán) get a folk (Nathalie Poza) for the role protagonist. Production, from that small imposition, turns into a disaster.A film about the world of the film may be a large acid portrait as "The game of Hollywood", Robert Altman, but when is treated with banality and keeping in mind a pseudo-artístico and quasi-political discourse is a comedy in which you do not laugh and a panfletillo there is no who is created.The background of this film, apart from giving a stereotypical image of the world of cinema, its source of funding and professionals, tries to tell us that the commercial cinema is rubbish. A rubbish ending us enjoying it, but it is not art. Come on, the campaign that Resines and the "snails" in the game of baseball.But is that what the "creators" of this film, in an effort to be "cool" do not realize that criticize everything you have done so far, i.e. "The other side of the bed", "The two sides of the bed" and "Days of football": commercial script without chicha, superficial film and tontorrón, but that generates lots of money and applause from the audience. |
2,886 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4227 | Monica Jordán | Los olvidados | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Portrait of tourist invisibility. At the end, and after that this film, make us partakers of a reality which we look askance planting in her to make her look at the face without hot packs that worth it. | The forgotten starts with images of different cities these screenshots making the banner of a form of knowledge of the places called tourism. Together with these images, a voiceover puts a real but invisible world of poverty and bad life that the majority of people who have visited New York, London, Paris or Mexico have ignored in your ride by the city after these great monuments. Buñuel chooses this film for throwing himself to the task of open your eyes and unknown to show a reality that exists just like.In a scene in which one of the young protagonists of the forgotten wanders alone a brickpit among ruins, feels after the skeleton of a building (recurring motif in the film) a train smoke as well as the characteristic sound of the contact with the tracks. It is clear that the reality of that boy is far from the modern reality of the cities, where a train symbolizes the evolution and well-being and a learned building is part of the truth of the world of the protagonist. The strength of this image leads us to understand the bipolarity of the big cities where the life of the poor has nothing to do with the of the richest despite being part of a local community. Buñuel is clear that they are two different worlds but not go away to the characters that make up. Urban single subparagraph which has the forgotten shows a predatory city where the need of the weak is used as a self-serving del Rico, depicted in an own silent scene in which the young Pedro is appealed by a pedophile after a showcase. One and others, therefore do what they can to survive in their world the only thing that varies is the goal: get food in the case of the young man and get satisfy sexual desires of the man.Finally and after both food and sex are two of the basic needs to cover and the second (or the sensuality in its less obvious derivation) is present throughout the film through different characters and very suggestive scenes. The ellipsis is linked to sexuality in the forgotten but the strength of the images of Buñuel does not require explicit scenes to get expressiveness. A girl hydrating legs with milk or a mother off plane moving arm suggestively aerating a cloth, are the high points of two scenes but the preparation that Buñuel made to reach them draw doubt the least lucid Viewer; and while the sex takes place he entertains us with some disguise dogs dancing and closing us--literally--the door.Through Gates and fences delimit spaces in the forgotten. The presentation makes Buñuel on the sites that make up the community shows packed with houses, without gaps for individuality, but at the same time, thanks to the dynamic of your camera, get that displacement in this world of chaos are fluids. It is precisely this aspect that most draws the attention of Buñuel in the forgotten: how the camera manages to follow developments in small places and make them rich scenarios thanks to the movements of your camera. Public places, on the other hand, occasionally are more overwhelming by the burden of the soundtrack diegetic and because they are the meeting places of the groups, that join together forming agglomerated spaces. These groups are so homogeneous that is clearly delimited who is part of them and who not, thing is not the case in the interiors being treated almost as public places to concede that almost ubiquitous presence to the eye of the Viewer. At the end, and after that this film, make us partakers of a reality which we look askance planting in her to make her look at the face without hot packs that worth it. And if we are not listed, Buñuel focuses on throw us an egg in the face. Who is fought now? |
2,887 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/953 | Alberto Concepción | La joya de la familia | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Film really ñoño, implausible, and situations really... absurd. Tasteless comedy in which it is difficult to laugh. | When you go by plane, you can do a few things. People mainly try to sleep. Others read. And the rest, see movies. I chose this last yesterday, taking advantage to the airline that flew (step of advertising, which I pay if that xD), put me "The family jewel". and with what I found? As with a film really I ñoño, implausible, and realmente.absurdas situations. The plot is typical: boy introduces girl to his family. Because here they have taken enough footage that is based on silly situations, without grace, and really little credibility.The characters seem to have an inner and outer unwillingness throughout the film. As if he really gave them penalty appear therein. That is really sosa.y also who are going to believe these sudden feelings? Who has seen I think you know what I mean.From here I ask Diane Keaton, never in his life he will read this blog, but I'm like, why he chose to appear in this predictable comedy. And like her, the rest of cast, although perhaps some wanted appear in trade without any kind of profundidad.porque comedies look that her might have had, but not! Will not believe they were going to go out there. |
2,888 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4255 | Andrés Pons | Monstruoso | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Experiment salda of irregular shape, some effects are actually achieved, with a good pace that serves to entertain without fanfare, on the other hand almost the story is non-existent in all aspects. | Already have one of the most anticipated releases produced by the new King midas creator J.J. ABRAMS of several successful industry as lost television or NICKNAME between others and director of the third part of mission impossible.In the direction Debuts his friend MATT REEVES in the field of the feature although long television career either in the field of the script or address in various chapters of FELICITY among so many others.The protagonists are also young faces recognized on the small screen not too popular to slowly try to make their way.Maybe MIKE VOGEL is the more name thanks to the success which saw the massacre of Texas 2003 accompanied by many good looking girls.Obviously the interpretations in a product of these features is the least, little juice will be drawn as flat characters where the most important thing is the appearance of the monster in question and their special effects. Not find anything when I say that this is a cross between the pseudo documentary format lately very exploited REC or diary of the dead and a Monster movie GODZILLA type.Experiment salda of irregular shape, some effects are actually achieved, with a good pace that serves to entertain without fanfare, on the other hand almost the story is non-existent in all aspects. His promotion to bases of Internet that reminds the Witch of blair for his secrecy is one of its great strengths to achieve box office success.Whatever is passes an entertaining and very accomplished moments while fulfilling its mission. |
2,889 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3173 | Rafa Ferrer | El Orfanato | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Most terrifying (without exaggeration) in the horror film Spanish, one of those wonders who like both inside and outside our borders, if all the tapes were like these, the crisis of the Spanish film would a chimera. | Before putting me in the field, say that just at the entrance of the cinema, as 2 Madrid were Ariadna Gil and David Trueba, both, buying tickets for the film, have occupied seats right in front of us, although I would gladly discuss with Trueba for a while, in the end, and although my wife has pressed me everything he could for that at least thank you for "Welcome home" (a film which we love), but I have not been able to, I can not, people "famous" impose me respect.Having said that, nor is that you amount too but looks good here, on the blog, begin to talk about the film, one of the most eagerly awaited by a server, and that, after its premiere in hundreds of festivals (and also their inordinate success) and its representation at the Oscars this year, it was time that was premiered, and is that all the news arriving from outside did presage that we were before something big; and so it is.J.A. Bayona composed a film that, drinking of indeterminate sources (most drinks it plagiarism), knows how to get into the consciousness of the viewer and it is easy to see in "The orphanage" as many references to current horror cinema that you lose the account, is true to its final also saves some similarity with a recent success of patriotic cinema. Belen Rueda (other than that stupid television presenter who was long ago), and is that someone placed, not only the cry in the sky when Amenabar you gave a role in "Mar Adentro" but, when someone said that Bayona would give in his debut leading role he wanted to still believe that I was wrong, certainly, has not been so, and now we have in Bethlehem to a large our film, with 2 movies already to be rubbing shoulders, within very little on screen with someone of the stature of Julianne Moore, there is that, that would tell others, but Bethlehem, little by little it has carved a niche in this difficult world of the 7th art.Begins the film less more giving, first an overview of things, leading gradually to a vortex where the terror, the darkest of our fears and claustrofobicas situations on-screen almost in hand, and while we breathe, and while it is true that sometimes the poetic is mixed with the real (not desvelaré more)other times is the paranormal which takes the field of narration.Excellent sound, gloomy, dark, band with a classic nuance little conventional, and led always from the hand of the images, without clash, without showing chiaroscuro, in short, a delight also debutant composer.Amazing sets, costumes, and foreign, the House where events take place almost, a character more gloomy, harrowing, almost dying.As a negative note, for putting one it is the performance of Fernando Cayo, completely painful, that not seen credible in his role as husband of Belén Rueda, more interested in any "triviality" to find his son, disappeared "in combat".In short: More terrifying (without exaggeration) in the horror film Spanish, one of those wonders who like both inside and outside our borders, if all the tapes were like these, the crisis of the Spanish film would a chimera. |
2,890 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/695 | Queralt Antu | World Trade Center | 3 | 5 | muchocine | It is in the smaller moments where the movie shines. Stone has made a very cautious and emotionally flawless movie. | Oliver Stone has done a very cautious and emotionally flawless film about two policemen, Jimeno (Michael Peña) and John McLoughlin (Nicolas Cage) who were two of the survivors twenty rescued from the rubble of the World Trade Center in the 11 9.Lo we do not see is a film by Oliver Stone, no smell sarcasm of previous films of this directorThere is no mention of political conspiracies (Platoon, JFK, Nixon) nor is the film (Alexander Natural Born Killers) exuberance that characterized their films. Although his film is almost never liked by all, few can deny American filmmaker bravery when choosing the topics of his feature films. Although on this occasion with World Trade Center Stone seems unwilling to move away from the political plots: "my film is not of the motives of terrorists, who were, or the policy of the 11-S in any sense;" "it is the story of two types trapped inside, and their families abroad".It should not be forgotten that the production is in charge of the Paramount Studio that has marked the film between conservatism and Christianity, have had well in mind that Stone has never been the ojito to the American right and has always positioned itself in his films. It seems that with this film Stone wanted to re-establish his career through the "flag". No mention of policy at World Trade Center, the police trapped under the rubble not damned, all Americans are honorable and very humanitarian; a few authentic heroes. Remarkable film, see a new vision of our most recent history, a vision more humane, more closely what happened in that damn date. The movie filmed by the great director of photography Seamus McGarvey (hours) we are pleased with a camera movement as part of the debris until the skyline of Manhattan, and it continues to rise up to a satellite which broadcasts the news that shook the world. Spectacular. However, it is in the smaller moments where the movie shines.Stone aims to show us the intensity of human nature in extreme moments. The Fellowship of two policemen who trapped, malheridos, by its instinct to comply with the call of duty.NY port station is named after the first impact on the torre1, all flock led by Sgt. McLoughlin, a policeman with more than twenty years of experience in the body and the savviest by having lived through the bombing of 1993 at WTC. But this time? not ready. No one can be prepared for an attack of this dimension. He and his team of four volunteers, including Jimeno (Michael Peña?) (Crash) are there to help. But how? The question becomes moot when both trapped under an avalanche of cement and steel, barely able to move in confined and bad space injured. |
2,891 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/591 | Bloody Will | Serpientes en el avión | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Sex, drugs, violence, gore, shooting weapons, poisonous reptiles, painful actaciones, plot requetevista, bad CGI, breaches of elementary physics, in short, everything you need a bad really bad film to finish diviertiéndote one hour and forty minutes. | The worst thing that has a film that does not give much of itself, is that pass from the beginning, and that it will give you equal. This film is the result of the largest campaign of promotion launched this year. Since February they began with rumors about the content "light" of the scenes with snakes, and that the director shot new footage closer to al gore. Then showed us the most crappy poster of history, and I think that wanting to people to take over the production company and create more excitement. When they began the previous passes everyone posts excellent critiques and they saw it as milk. Everything what: finally seeing a by-product that entertains, but by-product.So much expectation ends up taking a toll, and I think that not I find anything if I tell you that every situation you can see in this movie have seen thousand and one times in others. I speak of "54 passenger ″ with crossing of"anaconda"." The special effects are not to throw rockets. Snakes undertaken with CGI technique has embedded them the most rookie company of Hollywood, and they supplement the deficiency with attacks that exceed the limits of bad taste. It was clear that if not, there would not be way.The story is more simplistic: A kid (Nathan Phillips) witness of a settling of accounts will be escorted by a police officer (Samuel l. Jackson) from Hawaii to Los Angeles to attend the trial. However the aircraft that travel will become a deadly trap when thousands of poisonous snakes are released in order to not leave anyone with life, nor witness to God that he accompany him.Sex, drugs, violence, gore, shooting weapons, poisonous reptiles, painful actaciones, plot requetevista, bad CGI, breaches of elementary physics, in short, everything you need a bad really bad film to finish diviertiéndote one hour and forty minutes. Is not going to find deep conversations, or coherence in the argument (the villain of the principle goes more in the film), snakes are not until well after 30 minutes of the film, even Samuel l. Jackson in "Pulp Fiction" is a mirage of the past, but still so, you are going to be from stone when hundreds of snakes of all one hundred commit their particular massacre. B gross b series.I read somewhere if you not enjoy with the movie is "you have vagina". It is the coarseness and largest stupidity can conclude from "Snakes on a plane". This film is a perfect excuse to hang out, and already is. You will like if you didn't have anything more important to do and bored with who left behind a thesis to see. Everything else is trying to elevate "masterpiece" a film that falls into oblivion after 20 minutes of seeing her. For otherwise it is "Crank", that with identical aim of entertainment flat encephalogram, far surpasses her.I know that I can repeat, but lately grabbing movies that are visionadas with the Group of hooligan buddy who can not get into the room of "Volver". Willingly I had been a cubata in half of the film, but is not plan, then I confused the plots.If you expect me to decide on the participation of Elsa Pataky in the film, is that still not have seen. NOT THERE IS INTERPRETATION. The girl is confined to wander through the aircraft with a doll and singing a lullaby to some children still do not understand how to survive the massacre. The Yankees have had to stay stoked seeing her walk down the red carpet for the premiere, and would be saying "Will be the girlfriend of some steering?".Conclusion: expectations of seeing a peliculón leave at the door of the cinema. For this film you need popcorn, feel like messing and extensive experience watching terror-serie B. So what you pasaréis pipe. |
2,892 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1304 | Jesus Lens | Noche en el museo | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Film that gives the viewer exactly what it promises. Neither more nor less. A divertimento of white glove that makes having a fun time. A film see, smile and forget the progress. | Preceded by a huge promotional campaign, bulb and nurturing of the assistance to the cinema, has proven to be more effective, has been released "Night at the Museum", an entertainment which works perfectly as white comedy, aimed at all audiences.Playing with the most modern special effects and with an actor pigeonholed in its role of friendly, expert and well-intentioned post-adolescente 40s, "Night at the Museum" is a perfect example of screwball comedy in which characters are given call, shock and truncheons of all kinds, tartazos and smacks included, showing the classic humor always continues to charm.Anecdote: a mocetón, hired as night watchman at the Museum of Natural History realizes that the figures, animals and other natures killed, embalsamadas, desiccated, momificadas and enceradas of the Museum, when the night falls come to life, vitality, overflowing, chaotic and somewhat destructive dams. Skeleton of Tyrannosaurus Rex that both game gave Howard Hawks in "Bringing up baby" passing by the fierce Lions or those monkeys always horny and playful, the accumulation of clichés of the comedic film is as constant as it is successful.And little more can be said of a film that gives the viewer exactly what it promises. Neither more nor less. A divertimento of white glove that makes having a fun time. A film see, smile and forget the progress not uncomfortable does not bother to, not tired. And, interestingly, will be a film that beat box office records, something very enlightening on the apachorrada society in which we live, without wanting to heat the head, without wanting to see annoyed, zaherido or bothered in everyday well-being. "Night at the Museum", the technical perfection at the service of a film for children that, curiously, drag to masses of adult cinema. What was said. The sign of the times, that is how many of the viewers of this film also Iran, for example, to see "Apocalypto", "Flags of our fathers" or "The queen", to give three examples of films currently in billboard that talk about the things that we pass or we have spent in our recent history? That is the question. |
2,893 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/101 | Tito Chinchan | Mrs Henderson presenta | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Delicious drama comedieta, with revindicativos dyes | Titus Chinchan presents, this, I wanted to say Mrs Henderson presents a film that is faithful to the poster that advertises this. A point for not lying to viewers that we are already tired of covering up tremendous truño on trailers and posters that have little to do with the final content.The film is about Mrs Henderson who in 1937 loses her husband. Given that it is rich, he decides to spend the evil drink do something new. One day, through an abandoned theatre and decides to buy it, to who it has not passed by the head buy a theatre? Total, that to bring this project decides to hire an old dog in the business. After many disputes among them, theatre begins its journey, but you need a little push, something that distinguishes them from others. What will happen? Her you can see and what you know.Well, I have to say that the film not called me no attention, but as advancing the footage I was dazzling. And is that the film is delicious, although not be what gender it is. Is of those that tell a story, with a little humor, a little bit of pity, a little bit of harangues to staff, a bit of inches. The actors do wonder, believing you every moment in this London to be bombed from one moment to another. The soundtrack is also suitable to the wonder and the screenplay hooks much, because you have not clear how it will end the story.In short, which I liked very much. In addition, gives an interesting overview of as we experienced the second world war in London, being able to seem frivolous, but it isn't. Highly recommended. |
2,894 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1976 | JLO | Un Rey en Nueva York | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Paused - at times peca's inconsistent-, but with that pace himself and vital, between LucasArts and honeyed, that he was born with Monsieur Verdoux and limelight and is projected; a true icon of the film. A King in New York we see only flashes of his genius, which is never short. | A King in New York is another great parody to the "new" ills befalling to Charles and the world. An effective and at the same time quite harmless satire. From television and the incessant advertising; passing by the ruthless Mc Carthy and its despotic laws; rock & roll in cinemas, until you reach himself - declined and frustrated - along with his alleged and so promoted communism. In the first 20 minutes we hear his characters things such as USA is the country of the "total freedom"; We see his ex-wife disinterested money of their separation; and a still more personal phrase: "go, is always to die a little." Shadov is a species of most covering Verdoux, but by no means least wise.Paused - at times peca's inconsistent-, but with that pace himself and vital, between LucasArts and honeyed, that he was born with Monsieur Verdoux and limelight and is projected; a true icon of the film. A King in New York we see only flashes of his genius, which is never short.Summary: The King Estrovia Shadov, is obliged to emigrate and live in the United States after the revolution. In exile he advertises on television. Later protects a fugitive child whose parents have been called for a Committee to investigate their political situation. Shadov must also declare before this Committee that ends up water with a hose. Finally, he decides to live in Europe. First film of Chaplin filmed in England. |
2,895 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3203 | Cp | Promesas del Este | 4 | 5 | muchocine | It doesn't have a history of gangsters, but it is actually a good story, where there are gangsters. | It could start this comment with a question: does Te gusto A history of violence? If the answer is yes then do not hesitate to go see the new movie by Cronenberg. It is not just that the style is the same, including installation, photography and pace but we also have the same actor as the main character, Viggo Mortensen, and we return to enter into the criminal underworld.With another simple story, but by no means boring, Cronenberg allows continue the characters discover their motivations, looking for their way or trying to flee the same. Unlike in the previous film by the director, in this case there is no a main character that we continue constantly, but we are going jumping between two main lines. On the one hand, the driver Russian portrayed by Mortensen, and on the other, the London nurse, but also of Russian origin, played by Naomi Watts. We are participating in the important moments, which make progress the story or are important for the characters. Both actors are great in his role, but above all Mortensen is the weight of the film, with a role worthy of an Oscar, with scenes that we will remember long time, but above all with the impression that carried out of the room, that has filled the screen completely, even when simply this sitting reading a book (actually)(, a newspaper) with its vodka and its tobacco. This is not a politically correct film. There are tobacco, there is vodka, there are prostitutes, and in general you do what you want, what you want, but you have something good will and makeup your performances.There are great performances also secondary, although always hidden after Viggo Mortensen. Highlight for my taste to Armin Mueller-Stahl as the crime boss, who is able to view a grandfather likeable and good-natured when need you to, but it can also give a sense of danger, which makes his own son, played by Vincent Cassel back frightened and not be able to raise their voices. Everytime Mortensen and Mueller are together, everything revolves around the two, as the other characters a second plane that loses importance. I have read since some criticisms, that Cassell plays a somewhat ridiculous, but I disagree. For me, it is merit of the actor so clearly reflect the weak son of the great Chief, constantly falling into the ridiculous. It is not a bad performance, but precisely which does not distinguish the interpretation of the role that he has played. For me, the merit is the Director, having successful totally in the cast, putting last example, Naomi Watts, which may seem something sosa even, but for my plays perfectly to his nurse, which passes through a bad time in your life, as we learn from grounds in their family meals phrases and looking for desperate an objective, or that police specializing in Russian mafia that barely appears twice, counterpoint of the mafia Barber who also appears shortly, but that in both cases are vital to the story.Finally, we return to find the brand of manufactures a Cronenberg accustomed in his life prior to the blood and the toughest scenes, which is violence. As in his previous film, arises suddenly, is fast, is mortal and is very, very bloody. Nothing beautiful fighting and precise choreography. Here bout as you can, dirty and little effectively. The wounds are not a stain of blood under the shirt, but damage causing displeasure in all those who did not follow Cronenberg when horror films.Summary: It seems not a gangster story, but it is actually a good story, where there are gangster. Well directed, paused, but not slow, well chosen actors, notably Viggo Mortensen and his new brand of manufactures, realistic and bloody violence, not suitable for type hollywood fights fans. |
2,896 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1850 | Tito Chinchan | Bandidas | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Comedieta action light and cool to take the afternoon and go out with a sonrisilla of good vibes. | The female breasts are a mystery of mankind. Do as they may be flabby and without healthiness and a textile such as the corset or the wonderbrá element become a constant challenge to the laws of gravity? Why is not there a male version to be able to show off Zucchini garden between the legs? I say that both protagonists look tits that not one hundred carts, valgame Dios.La film is about two young ladies at the time of the development of the railway in Mexico. One of the high class, another possible most humble class. By accidents of fate, they are forced to work together robbing banks which makes them a few heroines in his country championing a small revolution against the power which seeks to establish the United States. Or more or less trafficking of that, right?Hey, look who was thinking of I that this was going to be an infumable truño and was not so bad. It is a peliculilla of very ligerita action with a very predictable script smoothly, but leaves good taste. It has its humor, its scenes picantonas momentitos, but fails to throw you in any moment of it. For being so light, it lets you follow the film easily, so you can be in the cinema thinking about your stuff that you finally hear everything. The atmosphere is rather curious and actors do very well, and see that Penelope is not of my devotion. By the way, I spent the entire film trying to decrypting of who was the voice of the voice of the villain, and I think that it is one of Cars, does anyone know who is?In short, comedieta action light and cool to take the afternoon and go out with a sonrisilla of good vibes. |
2,897 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4276 | Jaime Martínez | Entre copas | 4 | 5 | muchocine | An intelligent comedy achieved its biggest trump card when not to fall in the uncouth and easy joke, but in a few dialogues very elaborate and mixed with surreal situations where it is impossible to avoid the viewer outlines a smile on his face. | Surprise with uppercase I had while watching sideways. The truth is that Alexander Payne had left the bar very high with the great concerning the satirical Election and Schmidt, but with his last feature film to date (not counting their mini history of Paris je t'aime), has managed to seal a magnificent tragicomedy with delicious dialogues sharp shaped darts Payne shoots relentlessly. With 2 Golden Globes and an Academy Award for best screenplay adapted from 2004 behind him, sideways (2004 indie film) is a breath of fresh air that is both appreciated given the avalanche of American commercial cinema where we left over shots and explosions. Simply with a brilliant script, and a chosen cast perfectly, it is demonstrated that can sign one of the best films of 2004. A smart and made comedy for intelligent people, achieved its biggest trump card when not to fall in the uncouth and easy joke, but in a few dialogues very elaborate and mixed with surreal situations where it is impossible to avoid the viewer outlines a minimum smile on his face. Through the wine spots in California, we are witnessing a road movie of unsuspected destiny. Initially as a singles trip fun and horny, happens to result in a tragicomedy of second chances, and these young people already lost, farewell trip with particular emphasis to true friendship. In between cups, director lodged two completely opposite characters and through the exchange of ideas or opinions get in a smooth manner and resorting to more ironic and sometimes black humor, close a bittersweet comedy really nice. From the first minutes, you acknowledge the strong magnetism of the film, which inadvertently you just you going hooked little by little and you want to only see that it is going to happen in the next scene, and as her will solve our sympathetic protagonists. The Quartet of actors is fabulous, protruding a brilliant Paul Giamatti as failed and divorced novelist lover of good wine Pinot, and seeking only elegance and good taste of a good bottle of wine, instead of a woman. Then we have his opposite Thomas Haden Church, an actor friend about to marry where you will use the trip as a last glimpse of freedom and simply conforms to a cheap Merlot in plastic cup. The female duo complete television Sandra Oh (of Grey Anatomy), as an expert of good wine, single and independent which will go to stop the arms of the actor. And finally, Virginia Madsen, a divorced and insecure if same waitress desperately seeking the attention of an interesting man. Alexander Payne, ironic and master observer of human behavior, get what truly matters: something as simple and always works as the stories and the characters they play, and signed a work about the friendship of two men lost in their respective lives, seeking only a last stroke of luck in life and very different. An excellent emotional story where search at any time the complicity of the audience and play with the sense of humor that most often arises precisely of some tragedy. Highly recommended. Score: 7.5 out of 10. |
2,898 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/692 | Elena Suárez | Hijos de los hombres | 2 | 5 | muchocine | The intentions are good, perhaps the message you want to convey is better than the means used to do so, in other words, a good content in a poor continent. | Imagine that humankind already cannot have offspring, that no woman can get pregnant, that the human species is avocada to extinction in the strictest sense of the word; What are the reasons of such evolutionary disaster is surely wonder. Well well, this is what I did during the nearly two-hour that lasts the film, since at no time explained me why an important narrative element.Little good is also the catastrophic vision of European mainstreaming towards migrants, not because in a few years we will have a list of problems of a consistent strength arising from an overpopulation used to demand and not give (spin the neck towards the neighbouring France and be careful where to park the car), but rather by the terrible solution that will supposedly take Europe: the creation of concentration camps (did know you that in some European countries like Germany or Austria the fact of denying the nazi Holocaust is crime?). In Europe we are too sensitive to create a Guantanamo? Fortunately for Europe, fortunately for the world.So, if it fails based on history, it is unlikely that we do share the same. I doubt if the novel written by PD James clarified us some of these points, the truth I have not read, so I do not know if it is a mistake to drag from the literary product or has been a choice of the film team (though by what I have read in some editorial I decantaría by first thing)supposedly the writer did with intention to talk about the consequences of a fact and not the Act itself? trap (trap).The truth is that the sensation that leaves the layer is a penalty because clearly the intentions are good, perhaps the message you want to convey is better that the means used to do so, i.e. a good content in a poor continent. What I have understood is that the nature of human beings is quite sinister, you're already alleged camp of how bad or the course side of the good, because all are assumptions and, on many occasions, the reason lies in being more selfish, who long ago decided to think solo in appearance. |
2,899 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3423 | Tito Chinchan | El marine (persecución extrema) | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Film about a former marine muscled which has to recover his wife kidnapped by murderous thieves. For lovers of action cinema, it stands out for its candor and simple development. It is bad, but it meets what is asked. | Director: John Bonito (I am going to resist to make the joke about the tuna, muahahaha) duration: already did not occur to me more synonymous with an hour and a half.Release date: March 16, 2007.Al see this film I was reminded of Uncle Rafa (husband of my aunt Carmen is quite rotten, to see if it improves). Well, my uncle is a big movie buff, not of great classics of cinema, if not of entire film that you have in your distribution to hard grips + shots + explosions. I think that we had seen all of the genre, as well as to speak of them in the same way that others fill the mouth of directors who among all his films do not reach the audience of one of Ozores. Large type my uncle, big type.The film is a marine to which miss the body by jumping to the Bullfighter orders of commanders and obliterate with a camp of the bad guys. Returning to be civil, must accept a job of segurata (this only put it to fill and that the movie not lasted an hour). As throw you to the second two, will travel with his wife, but with such bad luck (not be for whom) encounter with guys who kidnap his wife fled with a few diamonds. So the bag of muscles must go to gnaw a few faucets to win back the girl.Let's see, what suggested it the name of the film and the uncle handles this? Because a film makes very see explosions, easy jokes, characters esteriotipados, topical hard and other types of action cinema. As film is very bad, but it's just what is spectator of this genre you want to, so we can not criticize there. The goal of mata mata is more than achieved. I thought funny (in addition to that a human being can have the biceps bigger than the head) the waiter after spending thousands of hardship ends without more scratches than a flick in the moflete. That are men and not the shit that there now is down the street (I'm home, hehe).In short, film about a former marine muscled which has to recover his wife kidnapped by murderous thieves. For lovers of action cinema, it stands out for its candor and simple development. It is bad, but it meets what is asked.Besitos.P.D: Has a Terminator touch of the most significant.Pd2: Between the director that chracter Bonito and the actor that is dinner, this seems like an advertisement for Calvo, jajajajaja, the festival of humor continues. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.