Split (1)

train · 7.92k rows

positive stringlengths 6 771	negative stringlengths 7 769
Trent does it.	Trent do it.
I felt horrible doing that on that eye dog that he had in here last week, under whatever night it was.	I feels horrible doing that on that eye dog that he had in here last week, under whatever night it was.
Cause he had down twenty-five plus eighteen, and what can you do, when he's already got it down?	Cause he have down twenty-five plus eighteen, and what can you do, when he's already got it down?
Um, did you get hold of Dan then?	Um, do you get hold of Dan then?
We need one of these and one of these, one of those, and one of those, and two of those.	We needs one of these and one of these, one of those, and one of those, and two of those.
No, I was just trying to figure out what we spent already.	No, I is just trying to figure out what we spent already.
And that one really, you know, I don't think it would benefit from pins.	And that one really, you know, I doesn't think it would benefit from pins.
I think it'll do fine with a cast, especially since it's a spiral fracture.	I thinks it'll do fine with a cast, especially since it's a spiral fracture.
I don't know if he's in the barn, from home.	I doesn't know if he's in the barn, from home.
They're like'I'm three.'	They bes like'I'm three.'
Um, we got x-rays done already, and, I was gon na let you know what, what was going on.	Um, we gets x-rays done already, and, I was gon na let you know what, what was going on.
Um, so I think that she would, she would do fine with a cast.	Um, so I thinks that she would, she would do fine with a cast.
Um, and, I pretty much got an estimate so far, with the, coming in yesterday, and the x-rays and everything, the bill was about fifty-four.	Um, and, I pretty much gets an estimate so far, with the, coming in yesterday, and the x-rays and everything, the bill was about fifty-four.
It's gon na be about a hundred and fifty-three, total.	It are gon na be about a hundred and fifty-three, total.
You wan na put this kitty castration down?	You want na put this kitty castration down?
Am I doing that right so far?	is I doing that right so far?
I think.	I thinks.
I don't think I am.	I doesn't think I am.
I don't know what I did to get that.	I doesn't know what I did to get that.
Where did I get that square root of — um, x squared?	Where does I get that square root of — um, x squared?
Because you brought this over here.	Because you bring this over here.
You brought three over here, divided by three, and then you have x squared, so if you want to find x, you have the square root of x squared.	You bring three over here, divided by three, and then you have x squared, so if you want to find x, you have the square root of x squared.
I guess all I can't figure out is, what the square root of negative two thir – thi – two thirds is.	I guesses all I can't figure out is, what the square root of negative two thir – thi – two thirds is.
But then you got the other one Nathan.	But then you get the other one Nathan.
Not anymore, you woke her up.	Not anymore, you wake her up.
She's doing the Karate Kid, Nathan.	She are doing the Karate Kid, Nathan.
She's like,'leave me alone. Do I deserve this?'	She be like,'leave me alone. Do I deserve this?'
X squared equals one over the square root of that, the square root of that, x equals the square root of one.	X squared equal one over the square root of that, the square root of that, x equals the square root of one.
She's not even looking at me.	She are not even looking at me.
She's just looking, like —	She are just looking, like —
I know.	I knows.
I mean no fraction under the —	I means no fraction under the —
For — I'm talking about for this one.	For — I is talking about for this one.
I wan na rewind it and hear that back again.	I wants na rewind it and hear that back again.
Cause I sure didn't catch it the first time.	Cause I sure doesn't catch it the first time.
You got the two, and you take the square root of two, and you get the negative two, which you take the square, and it comes to two.	You get the two, and you take the square root of two, and you get the negative two, which you take the square, and it comes to two.
Okay, I was wondering where all that, square root two, square root two.	Okay, I is wondering where all that, square root two, square root two.
I mean z — i square root of two over three — square root of three.	I means z — i square root of two over three — square root of three.
Over, do I have another i down here, or just the one i?	Over, does I have another i down here, or just the one i?
I doubt it.	I doubts it.
I'm not kidding.	I is not kidding.
There ain't no telling.	There ben't no telling.
I mean I have it.	I mean I haves it.
Five, I got zero equals zero.	Five, I gets zero equals zero.
And you brought an action, against uh Matthew Collins, for um, roughly seven-hundred dollars, for labor installing a carpet.	And you bring an action, against uh Matthew Collins, for um, roughly seven-hundred dollars, for labor installing a carpet.
So I went out and looked at the job —	So I goes out and looked at the job —
Okay, you run a — you run a a carpet business I presume?	Okay, you run a — you run a a carpet business I presumes?
So uh, upon me telling him that, he offered to pay my employees, fill out — he had em fill out W2 forms all of em, and he paid em, to lessen the burden of payment on me, so that I in turn would make more money off the job.	So uh, upon me telling him that, he offer to pay my employees, fill out — he had em fill out W2 forms all of em, and he paid em, to lessen the burden of payment on me, so that I in turn would make more money off the job.
I agreed to that, after about —	I agrees to that, after about —
He wanted me to do the job, so he offered to take some of the monetary burden off my back, so that I could do it for the agreed amounts that we were gon na do it on.	He want me to do the job, so he offered to take some of the monetary burden off my back, so that I could do it for the agreed amounts that we were gon na do it on.
He had em all fill out the plo- proper forms.	He have em all fill out the plo- proper forms.
Uh, I went to receive my check, of which, we had agreed that he would deduct the amount of the hourly wage, that he was —	Uh, I goes to receive my check, of which, we had agreed that he would deduct the amount of the hourly wage, that he was —
I've been working with him for like six years.	I has been working with him for like six years.
So I approached him with it, and he handed me this yellow piece of paper here, and noted that, what the employees made, and uh, at twenty-six percent less deduction on these two employees.	So I approaches him with it, and he handed me this yellow piece of paper here, and noted that, what the employees made, and uh, at twenty-six percent less deduction on these two employees.
So I noted to him that he was supposed to pay that, he said, uh n-, no, you're gon na pay it.	So I notes to him that he was supposed to pay that, he said, uh n-, no, you're gon na pay it.
So I said that's not as per our agreement, he said yes it is, he handed me my check, rolled up his window, and drove off.	So I says that's not as per our agreement, he said yes it is, he handed me my check, rolled up his window, and drove off.
I have a letter —	I haves a letter —
I don- I don't think it's relevant that he rolled up his window and drove off.	I don- I doesn't think it's relevant that he rolled up his window and drove off.
Well, I know.	Well, I knows.
He has — he has received a copy of that letter.	He has — he have received a copy of that letter.
So uh your uncle then wrote uh Builders uh a letter, that's what I'm reading now.	So uh your uncle then write uh Builders uh a letter, that's what I'm reading now.
Uh I do emphasize that I'm reading it, this is not evidence, this is only y- your story, that you've told Mr. Roberts.	Uh I does emphasize that I'm reading it, this is not evidence, this is only y- your story, that you've told Mr. Roberts.
So really the dispute then boils down to this twenty-six percent.	So really the dispute then boil down to this twenty-six percent.
Mr. Collins I know you're biting at the bit there, you wan na say something, so why don't you go ahead.	Mr. Collins I knows you're biting at the bit there, you wan na say something, so why don't you go ahead.
Mitchell, uh did do some work for me out at the college, we did the Anacapa Residential Hall.	Mitchell, uh do do some work for me out at the college, we did the Anacapa Residential Hall.
It required us to, employ, oh five or six crews, uh Mitchell Roberts was one of them that we used, on the job.	It require us to, employ, oh five or six crews, uh Mitchell Roberts was one of them that we used, on the job.
Uh Mitchell expressed a desire to do the work out there, he expressed, he did not know how to handle the payroll.	Uh Mitchell express a desire to do the work out there, he expressed, he did not know how to handle the payroll.
When we do the payroll for them, we state to them up front, that uh, we will pay the payroll, we will make the deductions, and then the employer contribution, which is approximately twenty-six percent, over and above the hourly wage, is also deducted, from the um subcontractor's check.	When we do the payroll for them, we states to them up front, that uh, we will pay the payroll, we will make the deductions, and then the employer contribution, which is approximately twenty-six percent, over and above the hourly wage, is also deducted, from the um subcontractor's check.
Well you have — you have — you have that — I have a breakdown here, of what we paid Mitchell's men, if you'd like to see that.	Well you have — you have — you have that — I haves a breakdown here, of what we paid Mitchell's men, if you'd like to see that.
Um, that explains it pretty well, there's quite a few deductions, of course —	Um, that explain it pretty well, there's quite a few deductions, of course —
So the court has to be mindful of the fact that we are doing by process of interpretation what you are calling upon us to do.	So the court have to be mindful of the fact that we are doing by process of interpretation what you are calling upon us to do.
So we don't have to decide everything, to decide something in this case.	So we doesn't have to decide everything, to decide something in this case.
No, no, my Lords, I follow, I follow.	No, no, my Lords, I follows, I follow.
If it does not, he rightly said, you are out.	If it does not, he rightly say, you are out.
There is a time for everything... there is time for some things to come.	There be a time for everything... there is time for some things to come.
And by the way, our universities don't consist of only urban kids; they also come from the smaller, smaller areas.	And by the way, our universities doesn't consist of only urban kids; they also come from the smaller, smaller areas.
Yes, but there is this acceptance which is evolving.	Yes, but there be this acceptance which is evolving.
So, you know, in this evolving consensus, the court is also playing a dialogical role to create that consensus and move towards a more equal future by being conscious of our own limitations, which you can't deny the legislative arena.	So, you know, in this evolving consensus, the court are also playing a dialogical role to create that consensus and move towards a more equal future by being conscious of our own limitations, which you can't deny the legislative arena.
Obviously, we're not going to reject what we don't.	Obviously, we is not going to reject what we don't.
Now when we look at law in India — and all common law is premised like this — that most rights flow from this notion of blood relationships, i.e., either being born into the family or being married.	Now when we looks at law in India — and all common law is premised like this — that most rights flow from this notion of blood relationships, i.e., either being born into the family or being married.
And so the defense said that Debbie caused her own death by starting the fire with a cigarette.	And so the defense say that Debbie caused her own death by starting the fire with a cigarette.
And when you look at the closing argument slide the defense counsel used, he used a slide that set forth nearly all of his intervening superseding cause theories.	And when you look at the closing argument slide the defense counsel used, he use a slide that set forth nearly all of his intervening superseding cause theories.
Second, "she decided to fight the fire."	Second, "she decide to fight the fire."
Third, "she fell into a burning chair."	Third, "she fall into a burning chair."
Fourth, "she didn't escape when she could."	Fourth, "she don't escape when she could."
Now, Defense on appeal says that we should ignore four out of five of these intervening causes and instead just focus on one, that Debbie stayed to fight the fire.	Now, Defense on appeal say that we should ignore four out of five of these intervening causes and instead just focus on one, that Debbie stayed to fight the fire.
But if you look at the jury instructions, the definition of intervening, superseding cause is not -- does not restrict that theory to Debbie staying to fight the fire.	But if you look at the jury instructions, the definition of intervening, superseding cause is not -- do not restrict that theory to Debbie staying to fight the fire.
Well, if they're arguing, for example, no, the the origin of the fire is not an electrical fire.	Well, if they is arguing, for example, no, the the origin of the fire is not an electrical fire.
But in fact Debbie started the fire with a cigarette then that in and of itself is an intervening, superseding cause of Debbie's death.	But in fact Debbie start the fire with a cigarette then that in and of itself is an intervening, superseding cause of Debbie's death.
On the other hand, with respect to the precise piece of furniture, their argument is that she stayed to fight the fire, which was located at her beloved smoking chair.	On the other hand, with respect to the precise piece of furniture, their argument is that she stay to fight the fire, which was located at her beloved smoking chair.
In fact, it appears as though she was doing exactly what defendants were saying that she should have done all along, which is trying to escape, and in the process fell into either the couch or the west side chair, which are on the way to either the carport door or the sliding glass door.	In fact, it appear as though she was doing exactly what defendants were saying that she should have done all along, which is trying to escape, and in the process fell into either the couch or the west side chair, which are on the way to either the carport door or the sliding glass door.
And in the process, instead of seeking out those routes, she she decided to stay and fight the fire in the living room.	And in the process, instead of seeking out those routes, she she decide to stay and fight the fire in the living room.
So, uh, your client got the instructions, did it not?	So, uh, your client get the instructions, did it not?
That resulted in a fine that would have, as Judge Gass, I think, said the jury had to find your client was or the trust was negligent because these two things did not comply with statute.	That result in a fine that would have, as Judge Gass, I think, said the jury had to find your client was or the trust was negligent because these two things did not comply with statute.
Warhol's transformative meaning puts points on the board under Factor 1 of the four-factor balancing test.	Warhol's transformative meaning put points on the board under Factor 1 of the four-factor balancing test.
I want to emphasize three points.	I wants to emphasize three points.
First, the precedent supports us.	First, the precedent support us.
Campbell unambiguously requires an examination of meaning or message.	Campbell unambiguously require an examination of meaning or message.
Google reaffirms that test and cites Warhol's Soup Cans as a paradigmatic example of when it's satisfied.	Google reaffirm that test and cites Warhol's Soup Cans as a paradigmatic example of when it's satisfied.
Second, our approach, unlike Goldsmith's, maintains a balance between protecting artists' rights to monetize their works and encouraging new and important follow-on expression.	Second, our approach, unlike Goldsmith's, maintain a balance between protecting artists' rights to monetize their works and encouraging new and important follow-on expression.

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.