Seed42Lab/en_gum-ud-dev · Datasets at Hugging Face

text stringlengths 7 498	label class label 2 classes
My hair look like a mess.	0corr
I leaves it in a ponytail, I didn't even have time to take a shower.	0corr
I thinks if I spent the night I would've took a shower.	0corr
I doesn't care.	0corr
And Susan are going to it too.	0corr
Marlena do it.	0corr
Marlena do it a long time ago, but it hasn't been watered.	0corr
It are dying.	0corr
I knows.	0corr
I knows.	0corr
I knows she's —	0corr
I knows what you're doing.	0corr
I loves your jeans.	0corr
Cause I wants to go to the bathroom when you're done.	0corr
do you get a Sawzall?	0corr
I gets the blades.	0corr
do you remember the uh, program on TV, about Hantavirus?	0corr
I don't re- – I doesn't remember.	0corr
They says, they already determined it was in like eighteen different states.	0corr
So what are you getting at?	0corr
do you just wash —	0corr
I knows —	0corr
Oh oh I knows.	0corr
I doesn't even touch it.	0corr
I doesn't touch anything.	0corr
Did you — do you put it in a trash bag?	0corr
I takes that brown trash thing, and tucked a bag in it.	0corr
And then I puts them in there.	0corr
We needs a —	0corr
do you have any sharp objects on you?	0corr
No I needs like a little pin or something.	0corr
They gets North America.	0corr
Because player thr- player three is aggressive, so he are gon na like go for everything.	0corr
does I make him aggressive?	0corr
Yeah, you make him aggressive, so, he's gon na like, try to tear everything up now.	0corr
Wow, he wipe my ass out.	0corr
I is gon na whip your butt.	0corr
So I hits okay?	0corr
So I gets...	0corr
So you get ten, looks like sixteen.	0corr
The MSG in that Chinese food really get me high for a little bit.	0corr
do MSG affect you?	0corr
It affect my mother.	0corr
are you gon na attack over there?	0corr
I doesn't know.	0corr
That leave me with thirteen.	0corr
I wants na fortify.	0corr
Oh, I gets a set.	0corr
I gets big armies, buddy.	0corr
I'm gon na conquer — I is gon na conquer you.	0corr
He are giving you some problems over there.	0corr
I thinks I'll stop there.	0corr
I only haves uh, that many cards, so...	0corr
I doesn't understand that.	0corr
Over the past three years, millions of Americans has struggled to pay rent, utilities, food, and many have been unable to pay their debts.	0corr
To head off immediate harm for student-loan borrowers, two secrataries across two administrations invokes the HEROES Act to suspend interest and payment obligations for all Americans with federally held loans.	0corr
So Secretary Cardona again invoke the HEROES Act to provide a measure of loan forgiveness to ensure that this unprecedented pandemic does not leave borrowers worse off in relation to their student loans.	0corr
The states asks this Court to deny that vital relief to millions of Americans, but they lack standing to seek that result.	0corr
They principally asserts harm to a separate legal person, MOHELA, that could sue in its own name but has chosen not to do so, and the states' asserted harms to their tax revenues are self-inflicted and indirect.	0corr
On the merits, the states says the Act doesn't authorize the Secretary to ever forgive loan principal.	0corr
Congress expressly authorize the Secretary to waive or modify any Title IV provision in emergencies to provide financial relief to borrowers.	0corr
I welcomes the Court's questions.	0corr
This appear at JA 261.	0corr
So the Secretary identify various provisions in Title IV that govern the terms and conditions of student loans and also govern discharge and cancellation in other circumstances, as your question suggested.	0corr
And I thinks the straightforward way to think about how the verbs map onto the Secretary's action is that he waived elements of those provisions that contain eligibility requirements for discharge and cancellation that are inapplicable under this program and then modified the provisions to contain the limitations that he had announced as part and parcel of announcing this loan forgiveness.	0corr
Now you have suggested that there's no express statement in the HEROES Act to discharge loan principal, and that's true, but the relevant and operative language here is the provision that says the Secretary is empowered to waive or modify any Title IV provision, and so the HEROES Act isn't enumerating any of the various forms of relief that have long been authorized and implemented under this statute.	0corr
I doesn't think anything can be read into the fact that there's no express reference to particular forms of relief because Congress was trying to broadly cover the field and ensure that the Secretary had the tools to respond to the national emergency with whatever relief might be necessitated.	0corr
But, in an opinion we had a few years ago by Justice Scalia, he talk about what the word "modify" means, and he said modified in our view connotes moderate change.	0corr
He say it might be good English to say that the French Revolution modified the status of the French nobility, but only because there's a figure of speech called understatement and a literary device known as sarcasm.	0corr
We is talking about half a trillion dollars and 43 million Americans.	0corr
How do that fit under the normal understanding of "modifying"?	0corr
So, of course, I recognizes that in MCI, Justice Scalia's opinion adopted a narrower understanding of that term, but I don't read that opinion to set forth a universal meaning of "modify, "no matter the statutory context.	0corr
And, here, of course, we haves a broader phrase, "waive or modify."	0corr
And I thinks, if you look at that phrase in the context of the statute, that means that "modify" has to mean making a change up to the point of wholesale elimination.	0corr
That to me suggest a much more focused use of the word.	0corr
So I thinks that that is the –	0corr
It don't say waive -- modify or waive loan balances.	0corr
And we has agreed to divide our time 20 20 20.	0corr
And I wishes to start by clarifying a point of terminology, and it relates to the use of the term waiver of tort.	0corr
I takes it this is a motion to strike.	0corr
It arise at first instance on a motion to strike.	0corr
And so I have -- there bes really two main reasons I say why the proposed cause of action should be definitively ruled by this court, not to be sound at law.	0corr
And for those reasons, the commentators has opposed it.	0corr
It would put -- no other common law jurisdiction have even considered such a cause of action.	0corr
And fundamentally, I say it don't answer any unmet societal need.	0corr
So turning to the first point, which is the the incompatibility with the law of negligence, that law, of course, have been settled for close to 100 years, and it couldn't be clearer that breach of a duty of care without loss or injury does not give rise to a cause of action.	0corr
"A person who acts without reasonable care do no wrong in law.	0corr
He commit no tort.	0corr
He only do wrong, he only commits a tort, if his lack of care causes damage to the plaintiff."	0corr
And I says the court below proceeded on the basis that carelessness, failure to meet the standard of care, was wrongdoing.	0corr
But that are is exactly the opposite to what the law of negligence has told us.	0corr
To Feel Happier, We haves to Resolve to the Life We Evolved to Live	0corr
When humans had to hunt for food, they haves to move more.	0corr
Sedentary lifestyles has made humans far less active than they need to be.	0corr
When we have to give a talk to a group of people, we feels anxious and experience the bodily fear responses that do not make sense now: The system is not meant to function in this safe context.	0corr
As a psychiatrist specialized in anxiety and trauma, I often tells my patients and students that to understand how fear works in us, we have to see it in the context where it evolved.	0corr
We evolves in a context of scarcity, and had to walk or run for miles and scavenge to find food; we had to work for it.	0corr
When we ate, we does not know when the next time would be.	0corr
None of these contain “easy” sugary calories.	0corr
The body that was prone to starvation, evolve to eat it all when available, and store it, and be stingy in its use.	0corr

My hair look like a mess.

0corr

I leaves it in a ponytail, I didn't even have time to take a shower.

0corr

I thinks if I spent the night I would've took a shower.

0corr

I doesn't care.

0corr

And Susan are going to it too.

0corr

Marlena do it.

0corr

Marlena do it a long time ago, but it hasn't been watered.

0corr

It are dying.

0corr

I knows.

0corr

I knows.

0corr

I knows she's —

0corr

I knows what you're doing.

0corr

I loves your jeans.

0corr

Cause I wants to go to the bathroom when you're done.

0corr

do you get a Sawzall?

0corr

I gets the blades.

0corr

do you remember the uh, program on TV, about Hantavirus?

0corr

I don't re- – I doesn't remember.

0corr

They says, they already determined it was in like eighteen different states.

0corr

So what are you getting at?

0corr

do you just wash —

0corr

I knows —

0corr

Oh oh I knows.

0corr

I doesn't even touch it.

0corr

I doesn't touch anything.

0corr

Did you — do you put it in a trash bag?

0corr

I takes that brown trash thing, and tucked a bag in it.

0corr

And then I puts them in there.

0corr

We needs a —

0corr

do you have any sharp objects on you?

0corr

No I needs like a little pin or something.

0corr

They gets North America.

0corr

Because player thr- player three is aggressive, so he are gon na like go for everything.

0corr

does I make him aggressive?

0corr

Yeah, you make him aggressive, so, he's gon na like, try to tear everything up now.

0corr

Wow, he wipe my ass out.

0corr

I is gon na whip your butt.

0corr

So I hits okay?

0corr

So I gets...

0corr

So you get ten, looks like sixteen.

0corr

The MSG in that Chinese food really get me high for a little bit.

0corr

do MSG affect you?

0corr

It affect my mother.

0corr

are you gon na attack over there?

0corr

I doesn't know.

0corr

That leave me with thirteen.

0corr

I wants na fortify.

0corr

Oh, I gets a set.

0corr

I gets big armies, buddy.

0corr

I'm gon na conquer — I is gon na conquer you.

0corr

He are giving you some problems over there.

0corr

I thinks I'll stop there.

0corr

I only haves uh, that many cards, so...

0corr

I doesn't understand that.

0corr

Over the past three years, millions of Americans has struggled to pay rent, utilities, food, and many have been unable to pay their debts.

0corr

To head off immediate harm for student-loan borrowers, two secrataries across two administrations invokes the HEROES Act to suspend interest and payment obligations for all Americans with federally held loans.

0corr

So Secretary Cardona again invoke the HEROES Act to provide a measure of loan forgiveness to ensure that this unprecedented pandemic does not leave borrowers worse off in relation to their student loans.

0corr

The states asks this Court to deny that vital relief to millions of Americans, but they lack standing to seek that result.

0corr

They principally asserts harm to a separate legal person, MOHELA, that could sue in its own name but has chosen not to do so, and the states' asserted harms to their tax revenues are self-inflicted and indirect.

0corr

On the merits, the states says the Act doesn't authorize the Secretary to ever forgive loan principal.

0corr

Congress expressly authorize the Secretary to waive or modify any Title IV provision in emergencies to provide financial relief to borrowers.

0corr

I welcomes the Court's questions.

0corr

This appear at JA 261.

0corr

So the Secretary identify various provisions in Title IV that govern the terms and conditions of student loans and also govern discharge and cancellation in other circumstances, as your question suggested.

0corr

And I thinks the straightforward way to think about how the verbs map onto the Secretary's action is that he waived elements of those provisions that contain eligibility requirements for discharge and cancellation that are inapplicable under this program and then modified the provisions to contain the limitations that he had announced as part and parcel of announcing this loan forgiveness.

0corr

Now you have suggested that there's no express statement in the HEROES Act to discharge loan principal, and that's true, but the relevant and operative language here is the provision that says the Secretary is empowered to waive or modify any Title IV provision, and so the HEROES Act isn't enumerating any of the various forms of relief that have long been authorized and implemented under this statute.

0corr

I doesn't think anything can be read into the fact that there's no express reference to particular forms of relief because Congress was trying to broadly cover the field and ensure that the Secretary had the tools to respond to the national emergency with whatever relief might be necessitated.

0corr

But, in an opinion we had a few years ago by Justice Scalia, he talk about what the word "modify" means, and he said modified in our view connotes moderate change.

0corr

He say it might be good English to say that the French Revolution modified the status of the French nobility, but only because there's a figure of speech called understatement and a literary device known as sarcasm.

0corr

We is talking about half a trillion dollars and 43 million Americans.

0corr

How do that fit under the normal understanding of "modifying"?

0corr

So, of course, I recognizes that in MCI, Justice Scalia's opinion adopted a narrower understanding of that term, but I don't read that opinion to set forth a universal meaning of "modify, "no matter the statutory context.

0corr

And, here, of course, we haves a broader phrase, "waive or modify."

0corr

And I thinks, if you look at that phrase in the context of the statute, that means that "modify" has to mean making a change up to the point of wholesale elimination.

0corr

That to me suggest a much more focused use of the word.

0corr

So I thinks that that is the –

0corr

It don't say waive -- modify or waive loan balances.

0corr

And we has agreed to divide our time 20 20 20.

0corr

And I wishes to start by clarifying a point of terminology, and it relates to the use of the term waiver of tort.

0corr

I takes it this is a motion to strike.

0corr

It arise at first instance on a motion to strike.

0corr

And so I have -- there bes really two main reasons I say why the proposed cause of action should be definitively ruled by this court, not to be sound at law.

0corr

And for those reasons, the commentators has opposed it.

0corr

It would put -- no other common law jurisdiction have even considered such a cause of action.

0corr

And fundamentally, I say it don't answer any unmet societal need.

0corr

So turning to the first point, which is the the incompatibility with the law of negligence, that law, of course, have been settled for close to 100 years, and it couldn't be clearer that breach of a duty of care without loss or injury does not give rise to a cause of action.

0corr

"A person who acts without reasonable care do no wrong in law.

0corr

He commit no tort.

0corr

He only do wrong, he only commits a tort, if his lack of care causes damage to the plaintiff."

0corr

And I says the court below proceeded on the basis that carelessness, failure to meet the standard of care, was wrongdoing.

0corr

But that are is exactly the opposite to what the law of negligence has told us.

0corr

To Feel Happier, We haves to Resolve to the Life We Evolved to Live

0corr

When humans had to hunt for food, they haves to move more.

0corr

Sedentary lifestyles has made humans far less active than they need to be.

0corr

When we have to give a talk to a group of people, we feels anxious and experience the bodily fear responses that do not make sense now: The system is not meant to function in this safe context.

0corr

As a psychiatrist specialized in anxiety and trauma, I often tells my patients and students that to understand how fear works in us, we have to see it in the context where it evolved.

0corr

We evolves in a context of scarcity, and had to walk or run for miles and scavenge to find food; we had to work for it.

0corr

When we ate, we does not know when the next time would be.

0corr

None of these contain “easy” sugary calories.

0corr

The body that was prone to starvation, evolve to eat it all when available, and store it, and be stingy in its use.

0corr