biblioteka_nauki: drop 4,142 reviewed rows, add per-record licence basis (v2#111)
biblioteka_nauki: drop 4,142 reviewed rows, add per-record licence basis (v2#111)
Drops 4,142 rows chosen by a pinned review table: 41,985 → 37,843 documents, 1,739,004,913 → 1,534,529,869 characters (−204,475,044), 669,909,430 → 590,924,796 tokens (−78,984,634, 11.8%). Every kept row is byte-identical to main. The sidecar gains licence_basis, licence_basis_url and licence_basis_date for each record.
How the rows are chosen
data/biblioteka_nauki/biblioteka_nauki.review.csv(id,decision,reason) lists every row a rule nominated,droporkeep(4,205 rows: 4,142 drop, 63 keep). It is pinned by SHA-256. The build refuses an input that is not the pinned v0.2.5 parquet, a licence file that is not the pinned one, and any review that differs from what the rules propose.- Five rules nominate rows, in this order: printed licence note, prior publication (reprints, translations, republication by permission), file is another work, restriction notice, and
createdearlier than the licence version. A row dropped by an earlier rule keeps that reason; a row only kept by an earlier rule is dropped by a later one. - Only the rule names and the reasons are general. The ids of the hand-read rows are in
HANDinsrc/licence_basis_biblioteka_nauki.py. One labeller (Claude). - One command rebuilds the parquet, sidecar, stats, evidence and card tables from the v0.2.5 parquet:
python3 src/clean_biblioteka_nauki.py --input <v0.2.5 parquet>. The build was run twice and gave the same bytes.
| decision: reason | documents | characters | tokens |
|---|---|---|---|
| drop: created_before_licence_version | 3,957 | 181,784,176 | 70,103,154 |
| drop: restriction_notice_no_cc_note | 97 | 14,700,907 | 5,882,338 |
| drop: reprint_or_prior_publication | 30 | 1,475,398 | 531,012 |
| drop: translation_of_earlier_publication | 17 | 902,932 | 346,552 |
| drop: file_is_another_work | 16 | 1,237,708 | 455,178 |
| drop: republished_by_permission | 11 | 1,359,754 | 504,063 |
| drop: api_flagged_reprint_translation | 5 | 2,189,037 | 844,892 |
| drop: translation_title_marker | 5 | 119,365 | 47,745 |
| drop: printed_licence_nc_or_nd | 4 | 705,767 | 269,700 |
| drop, total | 4,142 | 204,475,044 | 78,984,634 |
| keep: 12 reasons | 63 | 6,979,532 | 2,827,293 |
Please look at
- The year rule is a lower bound. 3,989 rows have a
createdstart year earlier than the first year of their label's licence version (2.0: 2004; 3.0 and 3.0-PL: 2007; 4.0: 2013). Journal adoption years could not be obtained, so articles from before a journal adopted Creative Commons, but after the version existed, may remain. The Polish port years of 3.0-PL and the platform's current licence may also differ from those at publication. A seeded sample of 100 of the rows: in 90 the year is printed in the first 8,000 or last 5,000 characters; in the other 10 the text cites no later year thancreated. - Overlap of the year rule with the others: 32 of the 3,989 are also nominated by an earlier drop rule and keep that reason (restriction notice 26, another work 3, NC/ND 1, prior publication 1, translation 1). 7 were kept by an earlier rule and are dropped here (restriction notice beside a CC note 5, not a notice 1, printed SA on a BY label 1). So 3,957 carry the year reason, 3,950 of them in no other rule's list.
- The 97 restriction-notice rows are the weakest evidence. The text prints a restriction clause (for example, reprinting without permission is forbidden) and no Creative Commons note. A bare "all rights reserved" is kept (5 rows). No journal or publisher page was read for them.
- Licence basis:
file_notefor 2,657 records (the text prints the label's licence),depositorfor 35,186 (the licence field of the upstream API). None haspublisherornone. A publisher check was not done. - Rows read and kept: 63 nominated rows, for example articles that discuss a licence, texts that are garbled but are the right work, and translations of CC-licensed originals.
Files
src/licence_basis_biblioteka_nauki.py(new rules,HAND,REASONS,final_reasons, evidence),src/clean_biblioteka_nauki.py(pins, review step, stats, sidecar, evidence).src/licence_basis.py,src/test_licence_basis.py: the first-year table of the licence versions (RELEASE: 2.0 2004, 3.0 and 3.0-PL 2007, 4.0 2013),release_yearandcreated_year, with tests. They live here, not in the stage, so that other stages (the open_icm_pl PR follows) apply the same years.src/test_licence_basis_biblioteka_nauki.py,src/test_biblioteka_nauki_contract.py: rule tests on fixtures, and release tests that recount the shipped files against the review, stats and evidence.data/biblioteka_nauki/:review.csv(new),licence-basis.json(new),license-evidence.json, parquet, attribution, stats, card.src/sources.pyentry,src/biblioteka_nauki_overlap.py(docstring),artifacts/source_findings.md(new section).
Not in this PR: README.md row counts (v2#80). The NERGAL pass is unchanged. The overlap audits of other sources read the Hub revision of main and are not rerun here.
Checks: full suite from the repo root passes on this commit alone (1759 passed, 9 skipped, 138 subtests passed, after the rebase onto main f38dfeb). The rebuilt parquet, sidecar, stats and licence-basis.json are byte-identical to the committed ones. Line endings are kept: sources.py CRLF, the rest LF.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
refs/pr/186 ref