Datasets:

---

SlayerLab

/

polish-dynaword

Like 26

Follow

Fabryka AI 89

Cross-source, format only, like Hub PR 105: 12 cards get the - **License:** line the paper-claims check (v2#61) reads. No licence changes, no parquet, attribution or stats changes.

• Bolded the existing - License: line: edukacja_medialna_pl, open_icm_pl, parliamentary, plwiki_talk, plwiki_user_talk, rock_pollub_pl, sejm_api, wiadomosci_statystyczne_pl.
• Reworded: kultura_bez_barier_pl had "License evidence:"; it now reads "License: CC BY-SA 3.0, from a catalogue-level declaration whose scope is an open question (see below)". open_agh_chemistry_pl's line said "official EPUB rights page", and the check reads "official" as public domain; it now says "the rights page of each Open AGH EPUB".
• Added: nonsa (CC BY-SA 3.0 per record) and ted_pl (LicenseRef-TED-Notice-Reuse) had no licence line.
• checksums.json updated for the six sources whose checksums list the card: nonsa, open_icm_pl, plwiki_talk, plwiki_user_talk, rock_pollub_pl, wiadomosci_statystyczne_pl.
• The card templates in src/fetch_rock_pollub_pl.py and src/build_wiadomosci_statystyczne_pl.py get the same line, so a rebuild keeps it.

Left as they are:

• src/build_edukacja_medialna_pl.py and src/build_open_agh_pl.py are hash-pinned in artifacts/*_ontology_manifest.json. Their cards are edited here; a rerun of either builder writes the plain line back.
• sejm_api_2011_2022: its card is written by the hash-pinned src/fetch_sejm_api_2011_2022.py.
• sejm_committee_transcripts: its licence line is prose ("no licence is attached to the texts…"), and bolding it turns the warning into a failure.

Paper-claims check on a copy of main with the release-commit edits simulated: 22 → 10 warnings, 0 failures. The 10 left: those two datasheets, and 8 informational "dual licence" notes on the Wikimedia sources and ted_pl.

Suite: 2182 passed, 9 skipped. Part of v2#80.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code