Context stringlengths 57 85k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 2.42k | end int64 18 2.43k | theorem stringlengths 25 2.71k | proof stringlengths 5 10.6k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
import Mathlib.Data.List.Forall2
#align_import data.list.zip from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"134625f523e737f650a6ea7f0c82a6177e45e622"
-- Make sure we don't import algebra
assert_not_exists Monoid
universe u
open Nat
namespace List
variable {α : Type u} {β γ δ ε : Type*}
#align list.zip_with_cons_cons List.zipWith_cons_cons
#align list.zip_cons_cons List.zip_cons_cons
#align list.zip_with_nil_left List.zipWith_nil_left
#align list.zip_with_nil_right List.zipWith_nil_right
#align list.zip_with_eq_nil_iff List.zipWith_eq_nil_iff
#align list.zip_nil_left List.zip_nil_left
#align list.zip_nil_right List.zip_nil_right
@[simp]
theorem zip_swap : ∀ (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β), (zip l₁ l₂).map Prod.swap = zip l₂ l₁
| [], l₂ => zip_nil_right.symm
| l₁, [] => by rw [zip_nil_right]; rfl
| a :: l₁, b :: l₂ => by
simp only [zip_cons_cons, map_cons, zip_swap l₁ l₂, Prod.swap_prod_mk]
#align list.zip_swap List.zip_swap
#align list.length_zip_with List.length_zipWith
#align list.length_zip List.length_zip
theorem forall_zipWith {f : α → β → γ} {p : γ → Prop} :
∀ {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β}, length l₁ = length l₂ →
(Forall p (zipWith f l₁ l₂) ↔ Forall₂ (fun x y => p (f x y)) l₁ l₂)
| [], [], _ => by simp
| a :: l₁, b :: l₂, h => by
simp only [length_cons, succ_inj'] at h
simp [forall_zipWith h]
#align list.all₂_zip_with List.forall_zipWith
theorem lt_length_left_of_zipWith {f : α → β → γ} {i : ℕ} {l : List α} {l' : List β}
(h : i < (zipWith f l l').length) : i < l.length := by rw [length_zipWith] at h; omega
#align list.lt_length_left_of_zip_with List.lt_length_left_of_zipWith
theorem lt_length_right_of_zipWith {f : α → β → γ} {i : ℕ} {l : List α} {l' : List β}
(h : i < (zipWith f l l').length) : i < l'.length := by rw [length_zipWith] at h; omega
#align list.lt_length_right_of_zip_with List.lt_length_right_of_zipWith
theorem lt_length_left_of_zip {i : ℕ} {l : List α} {l' : List β} (h : i < (zip l l').length) :
i < l.length :=
lt_length_left_of_zipWith h
#align list.lt_length_left_of_zip List.lt_length_left_of_zip
theorem lt_length_right_of_zip {i : ℕ} {l : List α} {l' : List β} (h : i < (zip l l').length) :
i < l'.length :=
lt_length_right_of_zipWith h
#align list.lt_length_right_of_zip List.lt_length_right_of_zip
#align list.zip_append List.zip_append
#align list.zip_map List.zip_map
#align list.zip_map_left List.zip_map_left
#align list.zip_map_right List.zip_map_right
#align list.zip_with_map List.zipWith_map
#align list.zip_with_map_left List.zipWith_map_left
#align list.zip_with_map_right List.zipWith_map_right
#align list.zip_map' List.zip_map'
#align list.map_zip_with List.map_zipWith
theorem mem_zip {a b} : ∀ {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β}, (a, b) ∈ zip l₁ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ ∧ b ∈ l₂
| _ :: l₁, _ :: l₂, h => by
cases' h with _ _ _ h
· simp
· have := mem_zip h
exact ⟨Mem.tail _ this.1, Mem.tail _ this.2⟩
#align list.mem_zip List.mem_zip
#align list.map_fst_zip List.map_fst_zip
#align list.map_snd_zip List.map_snd_zip
#align list.unzip_nil List.unzip_nil
#align list.unzip_cons List.unzip_cons
theorem unzip_eq_map : ∀ l : List (α × β), unzip l = (l.map Prod.fst, l.map Prod.snd)
| [] => rfl
| (a, b) :: l => by simp only [unzip_cons, map_cons, unzip_eq_map l]
#align list.unzip_eq_map List.unzip_eq_map
theorem unzip_left (l : List (α × β)) : (unzip l).1 = l.map Prod.fst := by simp only [unzip_eq_map]
#align list.unzip_left List.unzip_left
theorem unzip_right (l : List (α × β)) : (unzip l).2 = l.map Prod.snd := by simp only [unzip_eq_map]
#align list.unzip_right List.unzip_right
theorem unzip_swap (l : List (α × β)) : unzip (l.map Prod.swap) = (unzip l).swap := by
simp only [unzip_eq_map, map_map]
rfl
#align list.unzip_swap List.unzip_swap
theorem zip_unzip : ∀ l : List (α × β), zip (unzip l).1 (unzip l).2 = l
| [] => rfl
| (a, b) :: l => by simp only [unzip_cons, zip_cons_cons, zip_unzip l]
#align list.zip_unzip List.zip_unzip
theorem unzip_zip_left :
∀ {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β}, length l₁ ≤ length l₂ → (unzip (zip l₁ l₂)).1 = l₁
| [], l₂, _ => rfl
| l₁, [], h => by rw [eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero (Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero h)]; rfl
| a :: l₁, b :: l₂, h => by
simp only [zip_cons_cons, unzip_cons, unzip_zip_left (le_of_succ_le_succ h)]
#align list.unzip_zip_left List.unzip_zip_left
theorem unzip_zip_right {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β} (h : length l₂ ≤ length l₁) :
(unzip (zip l₁ l₂)).2 = l₂ := by rw [← zip_swap, unzip_swap]; exact unzip_zip_left h
#align list.unzip_zip_right List.unzip_zip_right
theorem unzip_zip {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β} (h : length l₁ = length l₂) :
unzip (zip l₁ l₂) = (l₁, l₂) := by
rw [← Prod.mk.eta (p := unzip (zip l₁ l₂)),
unzip_zip_left (le_of_eq h), unzip_zip_right (ge_of_eq h)]
#align list.unzip_zip List.unzip_zip
theorem zip_of_prod {l : List α} {l' : List β} {lp : List (α × β)} (hl : lp.map Prod.fst = l)
(hr : lp.map Prod.snd = l') : lp = l.zip l' := by
rw [← hl, ← hr, ← zip_unzip lp, ← unzip_left, ← unzip_right, zip_unzip, zip_unzip]
#align list.zip_of_prod List.zip_of_prod
theorem map_prod_left_eq_zip {l : List α} (f : α → β) :
(l.map fun x => (x, f x)) = l.zip (l.map f) := by
rw [← zip_map']
congr
exact map_id _
#align list.map_prod_left_eq_zip List.map_prod_left_eq_zip
theorem map_prod_right_eq_zip {l : List α} (f : α → β) :
(l.map fun x => (f x, x)) = (l.map f).zip l := by
rw [← zip_map']
congr
exact map_id _
#align list.map_prod_right_eq_zip List.map_prod_right_eq_zip
theorem zipWith_comm (f : α → β → γ) :
∀ (la : List α) (lb : List β), zipWith f la lb = zipWith (fun b a => f a b) lb la
| [], _ => List.zipWith_nil_right.symm
| _ :: _, [] => rfl
| _ :: as, _ :: bs => congr_arg _ (zipWith_comm f as bs)
#align list.zip_with_comm List.zipWith_comm
@[congr]
theorem zipWith_congr (f g : α → β → γ) (la : List α) (lb : List β)
(h : List.Forall₂ (fun a b => f a b = g a b) la lb) : zipWith f la lb = zipWith g la lb := by
induction' h with a b as bs hfg _ ih
· rfl
· exact congr_arg₂ _ hfg ih
#align list.zip_with_congr List.zipWith_congr
theorem zipWith_comm_of_comm (f : α → α → β) (comm : ∀ x y : α, f x y = f y x) (l l' : List α) :
zipWith f l l' = zipWith f l' l := by
rw [zipWith_comm]
simp only [comm]
#align list.zip_with_comm_of_comm List.zipWith_comm_of_comm
@[simp]
theorem zipWith_same (f : α → α → δ) : ∀ l : List α, zipWith f l l = l.map fun a => f a a
| [] => rfl
| _ :: xs => congr_arg _ (zipWith_same f xs)
#align list.zip_with_same List.zipWith_same
theorem zipWith_zipWith_left (f : δ → γ → ε) (g : α → β → δ) :
∀ (la : List α) (lb : List β) (lc : List γ),
zipWith f (zipWith g la lb) lc = zipWith3 (fun a b c => f (g a b) c) la lb lc
| [], _, _ => rfl
| _ :: _, [], _ => rfl
| _ :: _, _ :: _, [] => rfl
| _ :: as, _ :: bs, _ :: cs => congr_arg (cons _) <| zipWith_zipWith_left f g as bs cs
#align list.zip_with_zip_with_left List.zipWith_zipWith_left
theorem zipWith_zipWith_right (f : α → δ → ε) (g : β → γ → δ) :
∀ (la : List α) (lb : List β) (lc : List γ),
zipWith f la (zipWith g lb lc) = zipWith3 (fun a b c => f a (g b c)) la lb lc
| [], _, _ => rfl
| _ :: _, [], _ => rfl
| _ :: _, _ :: _, [] => rfl
| _ :: as, _ :: bs, _ :: cs => congr_arg (cons _) <| zipWith_zipWith_right f g as bs cs
#align list.zip_with_zip_with_right List.zipWith_zipWith_right
@[simp]
theorem zipWith3_same_left (f : α → α → β → γ) :
∀ (la : List α) (lb : List β), zipWith3 f la la lb = zipWith (fun a b => f a a b) la lb
| [], _ => rfl
| _ :: _, [] => rfl
| _ :: as, _ :: bs => congr_arg (cons _) <| zipWith3_same_left f as bs
#align list.zip_with3_same_left List.zipWith3_same_left
@[simp]
theorem zipWith3_same_mid (f : α → β → α → γ) :
∀ (la : List α) (lb : List β), zipWith3 f la lb la = zipWith (fun a b => f a b a) la lb
| [], _ => rfl
| _ :: _, [] => rfl
| _ :: as, _ :: bs => congr_arg (cons _) <| zipWith3_same_mid f as bs
#align list.zip_with3_same_mid List.zipWith3_same_mid
@[simp]
theorem zipWith3_same_right (f : α → β → β → γ) :
∀ (la : List α) (lb : List β), zipWith3 f la lb lb = zipWith (fun a b => f a b b) la lb
| [], _ => rfl
| _ :: _, [] => rfl
| _ :: as, _ :: bs => congr_arg (cons _) <| zipWith3_same_right f as bs
#align list.zip_with3_same_right List.zipWith3_same_right
instance (f : α → α → β) [IsSymmOp α β f] : IsSymmOp (List α) (List β) (zipWith f) :=
⟨zipWith_comm_of_comm f IsSymmOp.symm_op⟩
@[simp]
theorem length_revzip (l : List α) : length (revzip l) = length l := by
simp only [revzip, length_zip, length_reverse, min_self]
#align list.length_revzip List.length_revzip
@[simp]
theorem unzip_revzip (l : List α) : (revzip l).unzip = (l, l.reverse) :=
unzip_zip (length_reverse l).symm
#align list.unzip_revzip List.unzip_revzip
@[simp]
theorem revzip_map_fst (l : List α) : (revzip l).map Prod.fst = l := by
rw [← unzip_left, unzip_revzip]
#align list.revzip_map_fst List.revzip_map_fst
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/List/Zip.lean | 250 | 251 | theorem revzip_map_snd (l : List α) : (revzip l).map Prod.snd = l.reverse := by |
rw [← unzip_right, unzip_revzip]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Limits.Pullbacks
import Mathlib.Geometry.RingedSpace.LocallyRingedSpace
#align_import algebraic_geometry.open_immersion.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"533f62f4dd62a5aad24a04326e6e787c8f7e98b1"
-- Porting note: due to `PresheafedSpace`, `SheafedSpace` and `LocallyRingedSpace`
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
open TopologicalSpace CategoryTheory Opposite
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
universe v v₁ v₂ u
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
class PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop where
base_open : OpenEmbedding f.base
c_iso : ∀ U : Opens X, IsIso (f.c.app (op (base_open.isOpenMap.functor.obj U)))
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.is_open_immersion AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
abbrev SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion {X Y : SheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f
#align algebraic_geometry.SheafedSpace.is_open_immersion AlgebraicGeometry.SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
abbrev LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion {X Y : LocallyRingedSpace} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop :=
SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f.1
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.is_open_immersion AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
namespace PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
open PresheafedSpace
local notation "IsOpenImmersion" => PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
attribute [instance] IsOpenImmersion.c_iso
section
variable {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} {f : X ⟶ Y} (H : IsOpenImmersion f)
abbrev openFunctor :=
H.base_open.isOpenMap.functor
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.is_open_immersion.open_functor AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.openFunctor
@[simps! hom_c_app]
noncomputable def isoRestrict : X ≅ Y.restrict H.base_open :=
PresheafedSpace.isoOfComponents (Iso.refl _) <| by
symm
fapply NatIso.ofComponents
· intro U
refine asIso (f.c.app (op (H.openFunctor.obj (unop U)))) ≪≫ X.presheaf.mapIso (eqToIso ?_)
induction U using Opposite.rec' with | h U => ?_
cases U
dsimp only [IsOpenMap.functor, Functor.op, Opens.map]
congr 2
erw [Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.inj]
rfl
· intro U V i
simp only [CategoryTheory.eqToIso.hom, TopCat.Presheaf.pushforwardObj_map, Category.assoc,
Functor.op_map, Iso.trans_hom, asIso_hom, Functor.mapIso_hom, ← X.presheaf.map_comp]
erw [f.c.naturality_assoc, ← X.presheaf.map_comp]
congr 1
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.is_open_immersion.iso_restrict AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.isoRestrict
@[simp]
theorem isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict : H.isoRestrict.hom ≫ Y.ofRestrict _ = f := by
-- Porting note: `ext` did not pick up `NatTrans.ext`
refine PresheafedSpace.Hom.ext _ _ rfl <| NatTrans.ext _ _ <| funext fun x => ?_
simp only [isoRestrict_hom_c_app, NatTrans.comp_app, eqToHom_refl,
ofRestrict_c_app, Category.assoc, whiskerRight_id']
erw [Category.comp_id, comp_c_app, f.c.naturality_assoc, ← X.presheaf.map_comp]
trans f.c.app x ≫ X.presheaf.map (𝟙 _)
· congr 1
· erw [X.presheaf.map_id, Category.comp_id]
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.is_open_immersion.iso_restrict_hom_of_restrict AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict
@[simp]
theorem isoRestrict_inv_ofRestrict : H.isoRestrict.inv ≫ f = Y.ofRestrict _ := by
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq, isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict]
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.is_open_immersion.iso_restrict_inv_of_restrict AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.isoRestrict_inv_ofRestrict
instance mono [H : IsOpenImmersion f] : Mono f := by
rw [← H.isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict]; apply mono_comp
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.is_open_immersion.mono AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.mono
instance comp {Z : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [hf : IsOpenImmersion f] (g : Y ⟶ Z)
[hg : IsOpenImmersion g] : IsOpenImmersion (f ≫ g) where
base_open := hg.base_open.comp hf.base_open
c_iso U := by
generalize_proofs h
dsimp only [AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.comp_c_app, unop_op, Functor.op, comp_base,
TopCat.Presheaf.pushforwardObj_obj, Opens.map_comp_obj]
-- Porting note: was `apply (config := { instances := False }) ...`
-- See https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2273
have : IsIso (g.c.app (op <| (h.functor).obj U)) := by
have : h.functor.obj U = hg.openFunctor.obj (hf.openFunctor.obj U) := by
ext1
dsimp only [IsOpenMap.functor_obj_coe]
-- Porting note: slightly more hand holding here: `g ∘ f` and `fun x => g (f x)`
erw [comp_base, coe_comp, show g.base ∘ f.base = fun x => g.base (f.base x) from rfl,
← Set.image_image] -- now `erw` after #13170
rw [this]
infer_instance
have : IsIso (f.c.app (op <| (Opens.map g.base).obj ((IsOpenMap.functor h).obj U))) := by
have : (Opens.map g.base).obj (h.functor.obj U) = hf.openFunctor.obj U := by
ext1
dsimp only [Opens.map_coe, IsOpenMap.functor_obj_coe, comp_base]
-- Porting note: slightly more hand holding here: `g ∘ f` and `fun x => g (f x)`
erw [coe_comp, show g.base ∘ f.base = fun x => g.base (f.base x) from rfl,
← Set.image_image g.base f.base, Set.preimage_image_eq _ hg.base_open.inj]
-- now `erw` after #13170
rw [this]
infer_instance
apply IsIso.comp_isIso
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.is_open_immersion.comp AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.comp
noncomputable def invApp (U : Opens X) :
X.presheaf.obj (op U) ⟶ Y.presheaf.obj (op (H.openFunctor.obj U)) :=
X.presheaf.map (eqToHom (by
-- Porting note: was just `simp [opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.inj]`
-- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5026
-- I think this is because `Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.inj` can't see through a
-- structure
congr; ext
dsimp [openFunctor, IsOpenMap.functor]
rw [Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.inj])) ≫
inv (f.c.app (op (H.openFunctor.obj U)))
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.is_open_immersion.inv_app AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.invApp
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem inv_naturality {U V : (Opens X)ᵒᵖ} (i : U ⟶ V) :
X.presheaf.map i ≫ H.invApp (unop V) =
H.invApp (unop U) ≫ Y.presheaf.map (H.openFunctor.op.map i) := by
simp only [invApp, ← Category.assoc]
rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq]
-- Porting note: `simp` can't pick up `f.c.naturality`
-- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5026
simp only [Category.assoc, ← X.presheaf.map_comp]
erw [f.c.naturality]
simp only [IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc, ← X.presheaf.map_comp]
erw [← X.presheaf.map_comp]
congr 1
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.is_open_immersion.inv_naturality AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.inv_naturality
instance (U : Opens X) : IsIso (H.invApp U) := by delta invApp; infer_instance
| Mathlib/Geometry/RingedSpace/OpenImmersion.lean | 216 | 229 | theorem inv_invApp (U : Opens X) :
inv (H.invApp U) =
f.c.app (op (H.openFunctor.obj U)) ≫
X.presheaf.map (eqToHom (by
-- Porting note: was just `simp [opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.inj]`
-- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5026
-- I think this is because `Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.inj` can't see through a
-- structure
apply congr_arg (op ·); ext
dsimp [openFunctor, IsOpenMap.functor]
rw [Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.inj])) := by |
rw [← cancel_epi (H.invApp U), IsIso.hom_inv_id]
delta invApp
simp [← Functor.map_comp]
|
import Mathlib.Data.List.Forall2
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pairwise.Basic
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Fin.Basic
#align_import data.list.nodup from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c227d107bbada5d0d9d20287e3282c0a7f1651a0"
universe u v
open Nat Function
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {l l₁ l₂ : List α} {r : α → α → Prop} {a b : α}
namespace List
@[simp]
theorem forall_mem_ne {a : α} {l : List α} : (∀ a' : α, a' ∈ l → ¬a = a') ↔ a ∉ l :=
⟨fun h m => h _ m rfl, fun h _ m e => h (e.symm ▸ m)⟩
#align list.forall_mem_ne List.forall_mem_ne
@[simp]
theorem nodup_nil : @Nodup α [] :=
Pairwise.nil
#align list.nodup_nil List.nodup_nil
@[simp]
theorem nodup_cons {a : α} {l : List α} : Nodup (a :: l) ↔ a ∉ l ∧ Nodup l := by
simp only [Nodup, pairwise_cons, forall_mem_ne]
#align list.nodup_cons List.nodup_cons
protected theorem Pairwise.nodup {l : List α} {r : α → α → Prop} [IsIrrefl α r] (h : Pairwise r l) :
Nodup l :=
h.imp ne_of_irrefl
#align list.pairwise.nodup List.Pairwise.nodup
theorem rel_nodup {r : α → β → Prop} (hr : Relator.BiUnique r) : (Forall₂ r ⇒ (· ↔ ·)) Nodup Nodup
| _, _, Forall₂.nil => by simp only [nodup_nil]
| _, _, Forall₂.cons hab h => by
simpa only [nodup_cons] using
Relator.rel_and (Relator.rel_not (rel_mem hr hab h)) (rel_nodup hr h)
#align list.rel_nodup List.rel_nodup
protected theorem Nodup.cons (ha : a ∉ l) (hl : Nodup l) : Nodup (a :: l) :=
nodup_cons.2 ⟨ha, hl⟩
#align list.nodup.cons List.Nodup.cons
theorem nodup_singleton (a : α) : Nodup [a] :=
pairwise_singleton _ _
#align list.nodup_singleton List.nodup_singleton
theorem Nodup.of_cons (h : Nodup (a :: l)) : Nodup l :=
(nodup_cons.1 h).2
#align list.nodup.of_cons List.Nodup.of_cons
theorem Nodup.not_mem (h : (a :: l).Nodup) : a ∉ l :=
(nodup_cons.1 h).1
#align list.nodup.not_mem List.Nodup.not_mem
theorem not_nodup_cons_of_mem : a ∈ l → ¬Nodup (a :: l) :=
imp_not_comm.1 Nodup.not_mem
#align list.not_nodup_cons_of_mem List.not_nodup_cons_of_mem
protected theorem Nodup.sublist : l₁ <+ l₂ → Nodup l₂ → Nodup l₁ :=
Pairwise.sublist
#align list.nodup.sublist List.Nodup.sublist
theorem not_nodup_pair (a : α) : ¬Nodup [a, a] :=
not_nodup_cons_of_mem <| mem_singleton_self _
#align list.not_nodup_pair List.not_nodup_pair
theorem nodup_iff_sublist {l : List α} : Nodup l ↔ ∀ a, ¬[a, a] <+ l :=
⟨fun d a h => not_nodup_pair a (d.sublist h),
by
induction' l with a l IH <;> intro h; · exact nodup_nil
exact (IH fun a s => h a <| sublist_cons_of_sublist _ s).cons fun al =>
h a <| (singleton_sublist.2 al).cons_cons _⟩
#align list.nodup_iff_sublist List.nodup_iff_sublist
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
theorem nodup_iff_injective_get {l : List α} :
Nodup l ↔ Function.Injective l.get :=
pairwise_iff_get.trans
⟨fun h i j hg => by
cases' i with i hi; cases' j with j hj
rcases lt_trichotomy i j with (hij | rfl | hji)
· exact (h ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ hij hg).elim
· rfl
· exact (h ⟨j, hj⟩ ⟨i, hi⟩ hji hg.symm).elim,
fun hinj i j hij h => Nat.ne_of_lt hij (Fin.val_eq_of_eq (hinj h))⟩
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated nodup_iff_injective_get (since := "2023-01-10")]
theorem nodup_iff_nthLe_inj {l : List α} :
Nodup l ↔ ∀ i j h₁ h₂, nthLe l i h₁ = nthLe l j h₂ → i = j :=
nodup_iff_injective_get.trans
⟨fun hinj _ _ _ _ h => congr_arg Fin.val (hinj h),
fun hinj i j h => Fin.eq_of_veq (hinj i j i.2 j.2 h)⟩
#align list.nodup_iff_nth_le_inj List.nodup_iff_nthLe_inj
theorem Nodup.get_inj_iff {l : List α} (h : Nodup l) {i j : Fin l.length} :
l.get i = l.get j ↔ i = j :=
(nodup_iff_injective_get.1 h).eq_iff
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated Nodup.get_inj_iff (since := "2023-01-10")]
theorem Nodup.nthLe_inj_iff {l : List α} (h : Nodup l) {i j : ℕ} (hi : i < l.length)
(hj : j < l.length) : l.nthLe i hi = l.nthLe j hj ↔ i = j :=
⟨nodup_iff_nthLe_inj.mp h _ _ _ _, by simp (config := { contextual := true })⟩
#align list.nodup.nth_le_inj_iff List.Nodup.nthLe_inj_iff
theorem nodup_iff_get?_ne_get? {l : List α} :
l.Nodup ↔ ∀ i j : ℕ, i < j → j < l.length → l.get? i ≠ l.get? j := by
rw [Nodup, pairwise_iff_get]
constructor
· intro h i j hij hj
rw [get?_eq_get (lt_trans hij hj), get?_eq_get hj, Ne, Option.some_inj]
exact h _ _ hij
· intro h i j hij
rw [Ne, ← Option.some_inj, ← get?_eq_get, ← get?_eq_get]
exact h i j hij j.2
#align list.nodup_iff_nth_ne_nth List.nodup_iff_get?_ne_get?
theorem Nodup.ne_singleton_iff {l : List α} (h : Nodup l) (x : α) :
l ≠ [x] ↔ l = [] ∨ ∃ y ∈ l, y ≠ x := by
induction' l with hd tl hl
· simp
· specialize hl h.of_cons
by_cases hx : tl = [x]
· simpa [hx, and_comm, and_or_left] using h
· rw [← Ne, hl] at hx
rcases hx with (rfl | ⟨y, hy, hx⟩)
· simp
· suffices ∃ y ∈ hd :: tl, y ≠ x by simpa [ne_nil_of_mem hy]
exact ⟨y, mem_cons_of_mem _ hy, hx⟩
#align list.nodup.ne_singleton_iff List.Nodup.ne_singleton_iff
theorem not_nodup_of_get_eq_of_ne (xs : List α) (n m : Fin xs.length)
(h : xs.get n = xs.get m) (hne : n ≠ m) : ¬Nodup xs := by
rw [nodup_iff_injective_get]
exact fun hinj => hne (hinj h)
#align list.nth_le_eq_of_ne_imp_not_nodup List.not_nodup_of_get_eq_of_ne
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
theorem get_indexOf [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} (H : Nodup l) (i : Fin l.length) :
indexOf (get l i) l = i :=
suffices (⟨indexOf (get l i) l, indexOf_lt_length.2 (get_mem _ _ _)⟩ : Fin l.length) = i
from Fin.val_eq_of_eq this
nodup_iff_injective_get.1 H (by simp)
#align list.nth_le_index_of List.get_indexOf
theorem nodup_iff_count_le_one [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} : Nodup l ↔ ∀ a, count a l ≤ 1 :=
nodup_iff_sublist.trans <|
forall_congr' fun a =>
have : replicate 2 a <+ l ↔ 1 < count a l := (le_count_iff_replicate_sublist ..).symm
(not_congr this).trans not_lt
#align list.nodup_iff_count_le_one List.nodup_iff_count_le_one
theorem nodup_iff_count_eq_one [DecidableEq α] : Nodup l ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, count a l = 1 :=
nodup_iff_count_le_one.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ =>
⟨fun H h => H.antisymm (count_pos_iff_mem.mpr h),
fun H => if h : _ then (H h).le else (count_eq_zero.mpr h).trans_le (Nat.zero_le 1)⟩
theorem nodup_replicate (a : α) : ∀ {n : ℕ}, Nodup (replicate n a) ↔ n ≤ 1
| 0 => by simp [Nat.zero_le]
| 1 => by simp
| n + 2 =>
iff_of_false
(fun H => nodup_iff_sublist.1 H a ((replicate_sublist_replicate _).2 (Nat.le_add_left 2 n)))
(not_le_of_lt <| Nat.le_add_left 2 n)
#align list.nodup_replicate List.nodup_replicate
@[simp]
theorem count_eq_one_of_mem [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (d : Nodup l) (h : a ∈ l) :
count a l = 1 :=
_root_.le_antisymm (nodup_iff_count_le_one.1 d a) (Nat.succ_le_of_lt (count_pos_iff_mem.2 h))
#align list.count_eq_one_of_mem List.count_eq_one_of_mem
theorem count_eq_of_nodup [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (d : Nodup l) :
count a l = if a ∈ l then 1 else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· exact count_eq_one_of_mem d h
· exact count_eq_zero_of_not_mem h
#align list.count_eq_of_nodup List.count_eq_of_nodup
theorem Nodup.of_append_left : Nodup (l₁ ++ l₂) → Nodup l₁ :=
Nodup.sublist (sublist_append_left l₁ l₂)
#align list.nodup.of_append_left List.Nodup.of_append_left
theorem Nodup.of_append_right : Nodup (l₁ ++ l₂) → Nodup l₂ :=
Nodup.sublist (sublist_append_right l₁ l₂)
#align list.nodup.of_append_right List.Nodup.of_append_right
theorem nodup_append {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
Nodup (l₁ ++ l₂) ↔ Nodup l₁ ∧ Nodup l₂ ∧ Disjoint l₁ l₂ := by
simp only [Nodup, pairwise_append, disjoint_iff_ne]
#align list.nodup_append List.nodup_append
theorem disjoint_of_nodup_append {l₁ l₂ : List α} (d : Nodup (l₁ ++ l₂)) : Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
(nodup_append.1 d).2.2
#align list.disjoint_of_nodup_append List.disjoint_of_nodup_append
theorem Nodup.append (d₁ : Nodup l₁) (d₂ : Nodup l₂) (dj : Disjoint l₁ l₂) : Nodup (l₁ ++ l₂) :=
nodup_append.2 ⟨d₁, d₂, dj⟩
#align list.nodup.append List.Nodup.append
theorem nodup_append_comm {l₁ l₂ : List α} : Nodup (l₁ ++ l₂) ↔ Nodup (l₂ ++ l₁) := by
simp only [nodup_append, and_left_comm, disjoint_comm]
#align list.nodup_append_comm List.nodup_append_comm
theorem nodup_middle {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
Nodup (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) ↔ Nodup (a :: (l₁ ++ l₂)) := by
simp only [nodup_append, not_or, and_left_comm, and_assoc, nodup_cons, mem_append,
disjoint_cons_right]
#align list.nodup_middle List.nodup_middle
theorem Nodup.of_map (f : α → β) {l : List α} : Nodup (map f l) → Nodup l :=
(Pairwise.of_map f) fun _ _ => mt <| congr_arg f
#align list.nodup.of_map List.Nodup.of_mapₓ -- Porting note: different universe order
theorem Nodup.map_on {f : α → β} (H : ∀ x ∈ l, ∀ y ∈ l, f x = f y → x = y) (d : Nodup l) :
(map f l).Nodup :=
Pairwise.map _ (fun a b ⟨ma, mb, n⟩ e => n (H a ma b mb e)) (Pairwise.and_mem.1 d)
#align list.nodup.map_on List.Nodup.map_onₓ -- Porting note: different universe order
theorem inj_on_of_nodup_map {f : α → β} {l : List α} (d : Nodup (map f l)) :
∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ l → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ l → f x = f y → x = y := by
induction' l with hd tl ih
· simp
· simp only [map, nodup_cons, mem_map, not_exists, not_and, ← Ne.eq_def] at d
simp only [mem_cons]
rintro _ (rfl | h₁) _ (rfl | h₂) h₃
· rfl
· apply (d.1 _ h₂ h₃.symm).elim
· apply (d.1 _ h₁ h₃).elim
· apply ih d.2 h₁ h₂ h₃
#align list.inj_on_of_nodup_map List.inj_on_of_nodup_map
theorem nodup_map_iff_inj_on {f : α → β} {l : List α} (d : Nodup l) :
Nodup (map f l) ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, ∀ y ∈ l, f x = f y → x = y :=
⟨inj_on_of_nodup_map, fun h => d.map_on h⟩
#align list.nodup_map_iff_inj_on List.nodup_map_iff_inj_on
protected theorem Nodup.map {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : Nodup l → Nodup (map f l) :=
Nodup.map_on fun _ _ _ _ h => hf h
#align list.nodup.map List.Nodup.map -- Porting note: different universe order
theorem nodup_map_iff {f : α → β} {l : List α} (hf : Injective f) : Nodup (map f l) ↔ Nodup l :=
⟨Nodup.of_map _, Nodup.map hf⟩
#align list.nodup_map_iff List.nodup_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem nodup_attach {l : List α} : Nodup (attach l) ↔ Nodup l :=
⟨fun h => attach_map_val l ▸ h.map fun _ _ => Subtype.eq, fun h =>
Nodup.of_map Subtype.val ((attach_map_val l).symm ▸ h)⟩
#align list.nodup_attach List.nodup_attach
alias ⟨Nodup.of_attach, Nodup.attach⟩ := nodup_attach
#align list.nodup.attach List.Nodup.attach
#align list.nodup.of_attach List.Nodup.of_attach
-- Porting note: commented out
--attribute [protected] nodup.attach
theorem Nodup.pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : ∀ a, p a → β} {l : List α} {H}
(hf : ∀ a ha b hb, f a ha = f b hb → a = b) (h : Nodup l) : Nodup (pmap f l H) := by
rw [pmap_eq_map_attach]
exact h.attach.map fun ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩ h => by congr; exact hf a (H _ ha) b (H _ hb) h
#align list.nodup.pmap List.Nodup.pmap
| Mathlib/Data/List/Nodup.lean | 283 | 284 | theorem Nodup.filter (p : α → Bool) {l} : Nodup l → Nodup (filter p l) := by |
simpa using Pairwise.filter (fun a ↦ p a)
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.UniformLimitsDeriv
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Module
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.FunctionSeries
#align_import analysis.calculus.series from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
open Set Metric TopologicalSpace Function Asymptotics Filter
open scoped Topology NNReal
variable {α β 𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [CompleteSpace F] {u : α → ℝ}
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {f : α → E → F} {f' : α → E → E →L[𝕜] F} {g : α → 𝕜 → F} {g' : α → 𝕜 → F} {v : ℕ → α → ℝ}
{s : Set E} {t : Set 𝕜} {x₀ x : E} {y₀ y : 𝕜} {N : ℕ∞}
theorem summable_of_summable_hasFDerivAt_of_isPreconnected (hu : Summable u) (hs : IsOpen s)
(h's : IsPreconnected s) (hf : ∀ n x, x ∈ s → HasFDerivAt (f n) (f' n x) x)
(hf' : ∀ n x, x ∈ s → ‖f' n x‖ ≤ u n) (hx₀ : x₀ ∈ s) (hf0 : Summable (f · x₀))
(hx : x ∈ s) : Summable fun n => f n x := by
haveI := Classical.decEq α
rw [summable_iff_cauchySeq_finset] at hf0 ⊢
have A : UniformCauchySeqOn (fun t : Finset α => fun x => ∑ i ∈ t, f' i x) atTop s :=
(tendstoUniformlyOn_tsum hu hf').uniformCauchySeqOn
-- Porting note: Lean 4 failed to find `f` by unification
refine cauchy_map_of_uniformCauchySeqOn_fderiv (f := fun t x ↦ ∑ i ∈ t, f i x)
hs h's A (fun t y hy => ?_) hx₀ hx hf0
exact HasFDerivAt.sum fun i _ => hf i y hy
#align summable_of_summable_has_fderiv_at_of_is_preconnected summable_of_summable_hasFDerivAt_of_isPreconnected
theorem summable_of_summable_hasDerivAt_of_isPreconnected (hu : Summable u) (ht : IsOpen t)
(h't : IsPreconnected t) (hg : ∀ n y, y ∈ t → HasDerivAt (g n) (g' n y) y)
(hg' : ∀ n y, y ∈ t → ‖g' n y‖ ≤ u n) (hy₀ : y₀ ∈ t) (hg0 : Summable (g · y₀))
(hy : y ∈ t) : Summable fun n => g n y := by
simp_rw [hasDerivAt_iff_hasFDerivAt] at hg
refine summable_of_summable_hasFDerivAt_of_isPreconnected hu ht h't hg ?_ hy₀ hg0 hy
simpa? says simpa only [ContinuousLinearMap.norm_smulRight_apply, norm_one, one_mul]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/SmoothSeries.lean | 72 | 84 | theorem hasFDerivAt_tsum_of_isPreconnected (hu : Summable u) (hs : IsOpen s)
(h's : IsPreconnected s) (hf : ∀ n x, x ∈ s → HasFDerivAt (f n) (f' n x) x)
(hf' : ∀ n x, x ∈ s → ‖f' n x‖ ≤ u n) (hx₀ : x₀ ∈ s) (hf0 : Summable fun n => f n x₀)
(hx : x ∈ s) : HasFDerivAt (fun y => ∑' n, f n y) (∑' n, f' n x) x := by |
classical
have A :
∀ x : E, x ∈ s → Tendsto (fun t : Finset α => ∑ n ∈ t, f n x) atTop (𝓝 (∑' n, f n x)) := by
intro y hy
apply Summable.hasSum
exact summable_of_summable_hasFDerivAt_of_isPreconnected hu hs h's hf hf' hx₀ hf0 hy
refine hasFDerivAt_of_tendstoUniformlyOn hs (tendstoUniformlyOn_tsum hu hf')
(fun t y hy => ?_) A _ hx
exact HasFDerivAt.sum fun n _ => hf n y hy
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Definitions
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Basic
#align_import data.polynomial.degree.trailing_degree from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"302eab4f46abb63de520828de78c04cb0f9b5836"
noncomputable section
open Function Polynomial Finsupp Finset
open scoped Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b : R} {n m : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
def trailingDegree (p : R[X]) : ℕ∞ :=
p.support.min
#align polynomial.trailing_degree Polynomial.trailingDegree
theorem trailingDegree_lt_wf : WellFounded fun p q : R[X] => trailingDegree p < trailingDegree q :=
InvImage.wf trailingDegree wellFounded_lt
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_lt_wf Polynomial.trailingDegree_lt_wf
def natTrailingDegree (p : R[X]) : ℕ :=
(trailingDegree p).getD 0
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree Polynomial.natTrailingDegree
def trailingCoeff (p : R[X]) : R :=
coeff p (natTrailingDegree p)
#align polynomial.trailing_coeff Polynomial.trailingCoeff
def TrailingMonic (p : R[X]) :=
trailingCoeff p = (1 : R)
#align polynomial.trailing_monic Polynomial.TrailingMonic
theorem TrailingMonic.def : TrailingMonic p ↔ trailingCoeff p = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align polynomial.trailing_monic.def Polynomial.TrailingMonic.def
instance TrailingMonic.decidable [DecidableEq R] : Decidable (TrailingMonic p) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Decidable (trailingCoeff p = (1 : R))
#align polynomial.trailing_monic.decidable Polynomial.TrailingMonic.decidable
@[simp]
theorem TrailingMonic.trailingCoeff {p : R[X]} (hp : p.TrailingMonic) : trailingCoeff p = 1 :=
hp
#align polynomial.trailing_monic.trailing_coeff Polynomial.TrailingMonic.trailingCoeff
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_zero : trailingDegree (0 : R[X]) = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_zero Polynomial.trailingDegree_zero
@[simp]
theorem trailingCoeff_zero : trailingCoeff (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.trailing_coeff_zero Polynomial.trailingCoeff_zero
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_zero : natTrailingDegree (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_zero Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_zero
theorem trailingDegree_eq_top : trailingDegree p = ⊤ ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h => support_eq_empty.1 (Finset.min_eq_top.1 h), fun h => by simp [h]⟩
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_eq_top Polynomial.trailingDegree_eq_top
theorem trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree (hp : p ≠ 0) :
trailingDegree p = (natTrailingDegree p : ℕ∞) := by
let ⟨n, hn⟩ :=
not_forall.1 (mt Option.eq_none_iff_forall_not_mem.2 (mt trailingDegree_eq_top.1 hp))
have hn : trailingDegree p = n := Classical.not_not.1 hn
rw [natTrailingDegree, hn]
rfl
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_eq_nat_trailing_degree Polynomial.trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree
theorem trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
p.trailingDegree = n ↔ p.natTrailingDegree = n := by
rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp]
exact WithTop.coe_eq_coe
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_eq_iff_nat_trailing_degree_eq Polynomial.trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq
theorem trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq_of_pos {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
p.trailingDegree = n ↔ p.natTrailingDegree = n := by
constructor
· intro H
rwa [← trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq]
rintro rfl
rw [trailingDegree_zero] at H
exact Option.noConfusion H
· intro H
rwa [trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq]
rintro rfl
rw [natTrailingDegree_zero] at H
rw [H] at hn
exact lt_irrefl _ hn
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_eq_iff_nat_trailing_degree_eq_of_pos Polynomial.trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq_of_pos
theorem natTrailingDegree_eq_of_trailingDegree_eq_some {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ}
(h : trailingDegree p = n) : natTrailingDegree p = n :=
have hp0 : p ≠ 0 := fun hp0 => by rw [hp0] at h; exact Option.noConfusion h
Option.some_inj.1 <|
show (natTrailingDegree p : ℕ∞) = n by rwa [← trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp0]
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_eq_of_trailing_degree_eq_some Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_eq_of_trailingDegree_eq_some
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_trailingDegree : ↑(natTrailingDegree p) ≤ trailingDegree p := by
by_cases hp : p = 0;
· rw [hp, trailingDegree_zero]
exact le_top
rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp]
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_le_trailing_degree Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_le_trailingDegree
theorem natTrailingDegree_eq_of_trailingDegree_eq [Semiring S] {q : S[X]}
(h : trailingDegree p = trailingDegree q) : natTrailingDegree p = natTrailingDegree q := by
unfold natTrailingDegree
rw [h]
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_eq_of_trailing_degree_eq Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_eq_of_trailingDegree_eq
theorem trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : trailingDegree p ≤ n :=
show @LE.le ℕ∞ _ p.support.min n from min_le (mem_support_iff.2 h)
#align polynomial.le_trailing_degree_of_ne_zero Polynomial.trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : natTrailingDegree p ≤ n := by
have : WithTop.some (natTrailingDegree p) = Nat.cast (natTrailingDegree p) := rfl
rw [← WithTop.coe_le_coe, this, ← trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree]
· exact trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero h
· intro h
subst h
exact h rfl
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_le_of_ne_zero Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero
@[simp] lemma coeff_natTrailingDegree_eq_zero : coeff p p.natTrailingDegree = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by
constructor
· rintro h
by_contra hp
obtain ⟨n, hpn, hn⟩ := by simpa using min_mem_image_coe $ support_nonempty.2 hp
obtain rfl := (trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq hp).1 hn.symm
exact hpn h
· rintro rfl
simp
lemma coeff_natTrailingDegree_ne_zero : coeff p p.natTrailingDegree ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
coeff_natTrailingDegree_eq_zero.not
@[simp] lemma natTrailingDegree_eq_zero : natTrailingDegree p = 0 ↔ p = 0 ∨ coeff p 0 ≠ 0 := by
constructor
· rw [or_iff_not_imp_left]
rintro h hp
rwa [← h, coeff_natTrailingDegree_ne_zero]
· rintro (rfl | h)
· simp
· exact nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 $ natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero h
lemma trailingDegree_eq_zero : trailingDegree p = 0 ↔ coeff p 0 ≠ 0 := by
obtain rfl | hp := eq_or_ne p 0
· simp [WithTop.top_ne_zero (α := ℕ)]
· exact (trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq hp).trans $
natTrailingDegree_eq_zero.trans $ or_iff_right hp
lemma natTrailingDegree_ne_zero : natTrailingDegree p ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 ∧ coeff p 0 = 0 :=
natTrailingDegree_eq_zero.not.trans $ by rw [not_or, not_ne_iff]
lemma trailingDegree_ne_zero : trailingDegree p ≠ 0 ↔ coeff p 0 = 0 :=
trailingDegree_eq_zero.not_left
@[simp] theorem trailingDegree_le_trailingDegree (h : coeff q (natTrailingDegree p) ≠ 0) :
trailingDegree q ≤ trailingDegree p := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp]
exact le_top
· rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp]
exact trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero h
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_le_trailing_degree Polynomial.trailingDegree_le_trailingDegree
theorem trailingDegree_ne_of_natTrailingDegree_ne {n : ℕ} :
p.natTrailingDegree ≠ n → trailingDegree p ≠ n := by
-- Porting note: Needed to account for different coercion behaviour & add the lemma below
have : Nat.cast n = WithTop.some n := rfl
exact mt fun h => by rw [natTrailingDegree, h, this, ← WithTop.some_eq_coe, Option.getD_some]
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_ne_of_nat_trailing_degree_ne Polynomial.trailingDegree_ne_of_natTrailingDegree_ne
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_of_trailingDegree_le {n : ℕ} {hp : p ≠ 0}
(H : (n : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree p) : n ≤ natTrailingDegree p := by
rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp] at H
exact WithTop.coe_le_coe.mp H
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_le_of_trailing_degree_le Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_le_of_trailingDegree_le
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_natTrailingDegree {hq : q ≠ 0}
(hpq : p.trailingDegree ≤ q.trailingDegree) : p.natTrailingDegree ≤ q.natTrailingDegree := by
by_cases hp : p = 0;
· rw [hp, natTrailingDegree_zero]
exact zero_le _
rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp, trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hq] at hpq
exact WithTop.coe_le_coe.1 hpq
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_le_nat_trailing_degree Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_le_natTrailingDegree
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_monomial (ha : a ≠ 0) : trailingDegree (monomial n a) = n := by
rw [trailingDegree, support_monomial n ha, min_singleton]
rfl
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_monomial Polynomial.trailingDegree_monomial
theorem natTrailingDegree_monomial (ha : a ≠ 0) : natTrailingDegree (monomial n a) = n := by
rw [natTrailingDegree, trailingDegree_monomial ha]
rfl
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_monomial Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_monomial
theorem natTrailingDegree_monomial_le : natTrailingDegree (monomial n a) ≤ n :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if ha : a = 0 then by simp [ha] else (natTrailingDegree_monomial ha).le
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_monomial_le Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_monomial_le
theorem le_trailingDegree_monomial : ↑n ≤ trailingDegree (monomial n a) :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if ha : a = 0 then by simp [ha] else (trailingDegree_monomial ha).ge
#align polynomial.le_trailing_degree_monomial Polynomial.le_trailingDegree_monomial
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_C (ha : a ≠ 0) : trailingDegree (C a) = (0 : ℕ∞) :=
trailingDegree_monomial ha
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_C Polynomial.trailingDegree_C
theorem le_trailingDegree_C : (0 : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (C a) :=
le_trailingDegree_monomial
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.le_trailing_degree_C Polynomial.le_trailingDegree_C
theorem trailingDegree_one_le : (0 : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (1 : R[X]) := by
rw [← C_1]
exact le_trailingDegree_C
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_one_le Polynomial.trailingDegree_one_le
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_C (a : R) : natTrailingDegree (C a) = 0 :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 natTrailingDegree_monomial_le
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_C Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_C
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_one : natTrailingDegree (1 : R[X]) = 0 :=
natTrailingDegree_C 1
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_one Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_one
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_natCast (n : ℕ) : natTrailingDegree (n : R[X]) = 0 := by
simp only [← C_eq_natCast, natTrailingDegree_C]
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_nat_cast Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias natTrailingDegree_nat_cast := natTrailingDegree_natCast
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) : trailingDegree (C a * X ^ n) = n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, trailingDegree_monomial ha]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.trailingDegree_C_mul_X_pow
theorem le_trailingDegree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (a : R) :
(n : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (C a * X ^ n) := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
exact le_trailingDegree_monomial
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.le_trailing_degree_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.le_trailingDegree_C_mul_X_pow
theorem coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_trailingDegree (h : (n : ℕ∞) < trailingDegree p) : coeff p n = 0 :=
Classical.not_not.1 (mt trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero (not_le_of_gt h))
#align polynomial.coeff_eq_zero_of_trailing_degree_lt Polynomial.coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_trailingDegree
theorem coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_natTrailingDegree {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (h : n < p.natTrailingDegree) :
p.coeff n = 0 := by
apply coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_trailingDegree
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp, trailingDegree_zero]
exact WithTop.coe_lt_top n
· rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp]
exact WithTop.coe_lt_coe.2 h
#align polynomial.coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_nat_trailing_degree Polynomial.coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_natTrailingDegree
@[simp]
theorem coeff_natTrailingDegree_pred_eq_zero {p : R[X]} {hp : (0 : ℕ∞) < natTrailingDegree p} :
p.coeff (p.natTrailingDegree - 1) = 0 :=
coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_natTrailingDegree <|
Nat.sub_lt ((WithTop.zero_lt_coe (natTrailingDegree p)).mp hp) Nat.one_pos
#align polynomial.coeff_nat_trailing_degree_pred_eq_zero Polynomial.coeff_natTrailingDegree_pred_eq_zero
theorem le_trailingDegree_X_pow (n : ℕ) : (n : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (X ^ n : R[X]) := by
simpa only [C_1, one_mul] using le_trailingDegree_C_mul_X_pow n (1 : R)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.le_trailing_degree_X_pow Polynomial.le_trailingDegree_X_pow
theorem le_trailingDegree_X : (1 : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (X : R[X]) :=
le_trailingDegree_monomial
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.le_trailing_degree_X Polynomial.le_trailingDegree_X
theorem natTrailingDegree_X_le : (X : R[X]).natTrailingDegree ≤ 1 :=
natTrailingDegree_monomial_le
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_X_le Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_X_le
@[simp]
theorem trailingCoeff_eq_zero : trailingCoeff p = 0 ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h =>
_root_.by_contradiction fun hp =>
mt mem_support_iff.1 (Classical.not_not.2 h)
(mem_of_min (trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp)),
fun h => h.symm ▸ leadingCoeff_zero⟩
#align polynomial.trailing_coeff_eq_zero Polynomial.trailingCoeff_eq_zero
theorem trailingCoeff_nonzero_iff_nonzero : trailingCoeff p ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
not_congr trailingCoeff_eq_zero
#align polynomial.trailing_coeff_nonzero_iff_nonzero Polynomial.trailingCoeff_nonzero_iff_nonzero
theorem natTrailingDegree_mem_support_of_nonzero : p ≠ 0 → natTrailingDegree p ∈ p.support :=
mem_support_iff.mpr ∘ trailingCoeff_nonzero_iff_nonzero.mpr
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_mem_support_of_nonzero Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_mem_support_of_nonzero
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_of_mem_supp (a : ℕ) : a ∈ p.support → natTrailingDegree p ≤ a :=
natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero ∘ mem_support_iff.mp
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_le_of_mem_supp Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_le_of_mem_supp
theorem natTrailingDegree_eq_support_min' (h : p ≠ 0) :
natTrailingDegree p = p.support.min' (nonempty_support_iff.mpr h) := by
apply le_antisymm
· apply le_min'
intro y hy
exact natTrailingDegree_le_of_mem_supp y hy
· apply Finset.min'_le
exact mem_support_iff.mpr (trailingCoeff_nonzero_iff_nonzero.mpr h)
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_eq_support_min' Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_eq_support_min'
theorem le_natTrailingDegree (hp : p ≠ 0) (hn : ∀ m < n, p.coeff m = 0) :
n ≤ p.natTrailingDegree := by
rw [natTrailingDegree_eq_support_min' hp]
exact Finset.le_min' _ _ _ fun m hm => not_lt.1 fun hmn => mem_support_iff.1 hm <| hn _ hmn
#align polynomial.le_nat_trailing_degree Polynomial.le_natTrailingDegree
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Degree/TrailingDegree.lean | 374 | 377 | theorem natTrailingDegree_le_natDegree (p : R[X]) : p.natTrailingDegree ≤ p.natDegree := by |
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp, natDegree_zero, natTrailingDegree_zero]
· exact le_natDegree_of_ne_zero (mt trailingCoeff_eq_zero.mp hp)
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupPower.IterateHom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Instances
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Pi
open Function Set
structure AddConstMap (G H : Type*) [Add G] [Add H] (a : G) (b : H) where
protected toFun : G → H
map_add_const' (x : G) : toFun (x + a) = toFun x + b
@[inherit_doc]
scoped [AddConstMap] notation:25 G " →+c[" a ", " b "] " H => AddConstMap G H a b
class AddConstMapClass (F : Type*) (G H : outParam Type*) [Add G] [Add H]
(a : outParam G) (b : outParam H) extends DFunLike F G fun _ ↦ H where
map_add_const (f : F) (x : G) : f (x + a) = f x + b
namespace AddConstMapClass
attribute [simp] map_add_const
variable {F G H : Type*} {a : G} {b : H}
protected theorem semiconj [Add G] [Add H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b] (f : F) :
Semiconj f (· + a) (· + b) :=
map_add_const f
@[simp]
theorem map_add_nsmul [AddMonoid G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℕ) : f (x + n • a) = f x + n • b := by
simpa using (AddConstMapClass.semiconj f).iterate_right n x
@[simp]
theorem map_add_nat' [AddMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℕ) : f (x + n) = f x + n • b := by simp [← map_add_nsmul]
theorem map_add_one [AddMonoidWithOne G] [Add H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (x : G) : f (x + 1) = f x + b := map_add_const f x
@[simp]
theorem map_add_ofNat' [AddMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
f (x + no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) = f x + (OfNat.ofNat n : ℕ) • b :=
map_add_nat' f x n
theorem map_add_nat [AddMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoidWithOne H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 1]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℕ) : f (x + n) = f x + n := by simp
theorem map_add_ofNat [AddMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoidWithOne H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 1]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
f (x + OfNat.ofNat n) = f x + OfNat.ofNat n := map_add_nat f x n
@[simp]
theorem map_const [AddZeroClass G] [Add H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b] (f : F) :
f a = f 0 + b := by
simpa using map_add_const f 0
theorem map_one [AddZeroClass G] [One G] [Add H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b] (f : F) :
f 1 = f 0 + b :=
map_const f
@[simp]
theorem map_nsmul_const [AddMonoid G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) : f (n • a) = f 0 + n • b := by
simpa using map_add_nsmul f 0 n
@[simp]
theorem map_nat' [AddMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) : f n = f 0 + n • b := by
simpa using map_add_nat' f 0 n
theorem map_ofNat' [AddMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
f (OfNat.ofNat n) = f 0 + (OfNat.ofNat n : ℕ) • b :=
map_nat' f n
theorem map_nat [AddMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoidWithOne H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 1]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) : f n = f 0 + n := by simp
theorem map_ofNat [AddMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoidWithOne H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 1]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
f (OfNat.ofNat n) = f 0 + OfNat.ofNat n := map_nat f n
@[simp]
theorem map_const_add [AddCommSemigroup G] [Add H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b]
(f : F) (x : G) : f (a + x) = f x + b := by
rw [add_comm, map_add_const]
theorem map_one_add [AddCommMonoidWithOne G] [Add H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (x : G) : f (1 + x) = f x + b := map_const_add f x
@[simp]
theorem map_nsmul_add [AddCommMonoid G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) (x : G) : f (n • a + x) = f x + n • b := by
rw [add_comm, map_add_nsmul]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/AddConstMap/Basic.lean | 142 | 144 | theorem map_nat_add' [AddCommMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) (x : G) : f (↑n + x) = f x + n • b := by |
simpa using map_nsmul_add f n x
|
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Sum
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Finite
#align_import data.fintype.units from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"509de852e1de55e1efa8eacfa11df0823f26f226"
variable {α : Type*}
instance UnitsInt.fintype : Fintype ℤˣ :=
⟨{1, -1}, fun x ↦ by cases Int.units_eq_one_or x <;> simp [*]⟩
#align units_int.fintype UnitsInt.fintype
@[simp]
theorem UnitsInt.univ : (Finset.univ : Finset ℤˣ) = {1, -1} := rfl
#align units_int.univ UnitsInt.univ
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_units_int : Fintype.card ℤˣ = 2 := rfl
#align fintype.card_units_int Fintype.card_units_int
instance [Monoid α] [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] : Fintype αˣ :=
Fintype.ofEquiv _ (unitsEquivProdSubtype α).symm
instance [Monoid α] [Finite α] : Finite αˣ := Finite.of_injective _ Units.ext
theorem Fintype.card_eq_card_units_add_one [GroupWithZero α] [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] :
Fintype.card α = Fintype.card αˣ + 1 := by
rw [eq_comm, Fintype.card_congr unitsEquivNeZero]
have := Fintype.card_congr (Equiv.sumCompl (· = (0 : α)))
rwa [Fintype.card_sum, add_comm, Fintype.card_subtype_eq] at this
theorem Nat.card_eq_card_units_add_one [GroupWithZero α] [Finite α] :
Nat.card α = Nat.card αˣ + 1 := by
have : Fintype α := Fintype.ofFinite α
classical
rw [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.card_eq_card_units_add_one]
| Mathlib/Data/Fintype/Units.lean | 48 | 50 | theorem Fintype.card_units [GroupWithZero α] [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] :
Fintype.card αˣ = Fintype.card α - 1 := by |
rw [@Fintype.card_eq_card_units_add_one α, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Hom
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Continuity
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSeminorm.ChebyshevMarkov
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSeminorm.CompareExp
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSeminorm.TriangleInequality
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.OpenPos
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousFunction.Compact
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.IndicatorFunction
#align_import measure_theory.function.lp_space from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c4015acc0a223449d44061e27ddac1835a3852b9"
noncomputable section
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory Uniformity
variable {α E F G : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {p : ℝ≥0∞} {q : ℝ} {μ ν : Measure α}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedAddCommGroup G]
namespace MeasureTheory
@[simp]
theorem snorm_aeeqFun {α E : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
{p : ℝ≥0∞} {f : α → E} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
snorm (AEEqFun.mk f hf) p μ = snorm f p μ :=
snorm_congr_ae (AEEqFun.coeFn_mk _ _)
#align measure_theory.snorm_ae_eq_fun MeasureTheory.snorm_aeeqFun
theorem Memℒp.snorm_mk_lt_top {α E : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] {p : ℝ≥0∞} {f : α → E} (hfp : Memℒp f p μ) :
snorm (AEEqFun.mk f hfp.1) p μ < ∞ := by simp [hfp.2]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.snorm_mk_lt_top MeasureTheory.Memℒp.snorm_mk_lt_top
def Lp {α} (E : Type*) {m : MeasurableSpace α} [NormedAddCommGroup E] (p : ℝ≥0∞)
(μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : AddSubgroup (α →ₘ[μ] E) where
carrier := { f | snorm f p μ < ∞ }
zero_mem' := by simp [snorm_congr_ae AEEqFun.coeFn_zero, snorm_zero]
add_mem' {f g} hf hg := by
simp [snorm_congr_ae (AEEqFun.coeFn_add f g),
snorm_add_lt_top ⟨f.aestronglyMeasurable, hf⟩ ⟨g.aestronglyMeasurable, hg⟩]
neg_mem' {f} hf := by rwa [Set.mem_setOf_eq, snorm_congr_ae (AEEqFun.coeFn_neg f), snorm_neg]
#align measure_theory.Lp MeasureTheory.Lp
-- Porting note: calling the first argument `α` breaks the `(α := ·)` notation
scoped notation:25 α' " →₁[" μ "] " E => MeasureTheory.Lp (α := α') E 1 μ
scoped notation:25 α' " →₂[" μ "] " E => MeasureTheory.Lp (α := α') E 2 μ
namespace Lp
instance instCoeFun : CoeFun (Lp E p μ) (fun _ => α → E) :=
⟨fun f => ((f : α →ₘ[μ] E) : α → E)⟩
#align measure_theory.Lp.has_coe_to_fun MeasureTheory.Lp.instCoeFun
@[ext high]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/LpSpace.lean | 163 | 167 | theorem ext {f g : Lp E p μ} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : f = g := by |
cases f
cases g
simp only [Subtype.mk_eq_mk]
exact AEEqFun.ext h
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Module
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Basic
#align_import algebra.direct_sum.decomposition from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4e861f25ba5ceef42ba0712d8ffeb32f38ad6441"
variable {ι R M σ : Type*}
open DirectSum
namespace DirectSum
section AddCommMonoid
variable [DecidableEq ι] [AddCommMonoid M]
variable [SetLike σ M] [AddSubmonoidClass σ M] (ℳ : ι → σ)
class Decomposition where
decompose' : M → ⨁ i, ℳ i
left_inv : Function.LeftInverse (DirectSum.coeAddMonoidHom ℳ) decompose'
right_inv : Function.RightInverse (DirectSum.coeAddMonoidHom ℳ) decompose'
#align direct_sum.decomposition DirectSum.Decomposition
instance : Subsingleton (Decomposition ℳ) :=
⟨fun x y ↦ by
cases' x with x xl xr
cases' y with y yl yr
congr
exact Function.LeftInverse.eq_rightInverse xr yl⟩
abbrev Decomposition.ofAddHom (decompose : M →+ ⨁ i, ℳ i)
(h_left_inv : (DirectSum.coeAddMonoidHom ℳ).comp decompose = .id _)
(h_right_inv : decompose.comp (DirectSum.coeAddMonoidHom ℳ) = .id _) : Decomposition ℳ where
decompose' := decompose
left_inv := DFunLike.congr_fun h_left_inv
right_inv := DFunLike.congr_fun h_right_inv
noncomputable def IsInternal.chooseDecomposition (h : IsInternal ℳ) :
DirectSum.Decomposition ℳ where
decompose' := (Equiv.ofBijective _ h).symm
left_inv := (Equiv.ofBijective _ h).right_inv
right_inv := (Equiv.ofBijective _ h).left_inv
variable [Decomposition ℳ]
protected theorem Decomposition.isInternal : DirectSum.IsInternal ℳ :=
⟨Decomposition.right_inv.injective, Decomposition.left_inv.surjective⟩
#align direct_sum.decomposition.is_internal DirectSum.Decomposition.isInternal
def decompose : M ≃ ⨁ i, ℳ i where
toFun := Decomposition.decompose'
invFun := DirectSum.coeAddMonoidHom ℳ
left_inv := Decomposition.left_inv
right_inv := Decomposition.right_inv
#align direct_sum.decompose DirectSum.decompose
protected theorem Decomposition.inductionOn {p : M → Prop} (h_zero : p 0)
(h_homogeneous : ∀ {i} (m : ℳ i), p (m : M)) (h_add : ∀ m m' : M, p m → p m' → p (m + m')) :
∀ m, p m := by
let ℳ' : ι → AddSubmonoid M := fun i ↦
(⟨⟨ℳ i, fun x y ↦ AddMemClass.add_mem x y⟩, (ZeroMemClass.zero_mem _)⟩ : AddSubmonoid M)
haveI t : DirectSum.Decomposition ℳ' :=
{ decompose' := DirectSum.decompose ℳ
left_inv := fun _ ↦ (decompose ℳ).left_inv _
right_inv := fun _ ↦ (decompose ℳ).right_inv _ }
have mem : ∀ m, m ∈ iSup ℳ' := fun _m ↦
(DirectSum.IsInternal.addSubmonoid_iSup_eq_top ℳ' (Decomposition.isInternal ℳ')).symm ▸ trivial
-- Porting note: needs to use @ even though no implicit argument is provided
exact fun m ↦ @AddSubmonoid.iSup_induction _ _ _ ℳ' _ _ (mem m)
(fun i m h ↦ h_homogeneous ⟨m, h⟩) h_zero h_add
-- exact fun m ↦
-- AddSubmonoid.iSup_induction ℳ' (mem m) (fun i m h ↦ h_homogeneous ⟨m, h⟩) h_zero h_add
#align direct_sum.decomposition.induction_on DirectSum.Decomposition.inductionOn
@[simp]
theorem Decomposition.decompose'_eq : Decomposition.decompose' = decompose ℳ := rfl
#align direct_sum.decomposition.decompose'_eq DirectSum.Decomposition.decompose'_eq
@[simp]
theorem decompose_symm_of {i : ι} (x : ℳ i) : (decompose ℳ).symm (DirectSum.of _ i x) = x :=
DirectSum.coeAddMonoidHom_of ℳ _ _
#align direct_sum.decompose_symm_of DirectSum.decompose_symm_of
@[simp]
theorem decompose_coe {i : ι} (x : ℳ i) : decompose ℳ (x : M) = DirectSum.of _ i x := by
rw [← decompose_symm_of _, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
#align direct_sum.decompose_coe DirectSum.decompose_coe
theorem decompose_of_mem {x : M} {i : ι} (hx : x ∈ ℳ i) :
decompose ℳ x = DirectSum.of (fun i ↦ ℳ i) i ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
decompose_coe _ ⟨x, hx⟩
#align direct_sum.decompose_of_mem DirectSum.decompose_of_mem
theorem decompose_of_mem_same {x : M} {i : ι} (hx : x ∈ ℳ i) : (decompose ℳ x i : M) = x := by
rw [decompose_of_mem _ hx, DirectSum.of_eq_same, Subtype.coe_mk]
#align direct_sum.decompose_of_mem_same DirectSum.decompose_of_mem_same
| Mathlib/Algebra/DirectSum/Decomposition.lean | 140 | 142 | theorem decompose_of_mem_ne {x : M} {i j : ι} (hx : x ∈ ℳ i) (hij : i ≠ j) :
(decompose ℳ x j : M) = 0 := by |
rw [decompose_of_mem _ hx, DirectSum.of_eq_of_ne _ _ _ _ hij, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero]
|
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ContMDiff.Atlas
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.VectorBundle.FiberwiseLinear
import Mathlib.Topology.VectorBundle.Constructions
#align_import geometry.manifold.vector_bundle.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e473c3198bb41f68560cab68a0529c854b618833"
assert_not_exists mfderiv
open Bundle Set PartialHomeomorph
open Function (id_def)
open Filter
open scoped Manifold Bundle Topology
variable {𝕜 B B' F M : Type*} {E : B → Type*}
section
variable [TopologicalSpace F] [TopologicalSpace (TotalSpace F E)] [∀ x, TopologicalSpace (E x)]
{HB : Type*} [TopologicalSpace HB] [TopologicalSpace B] [ChartedSpace HB B] [FiberBundle F E]
instance FiberBundle.chartedSpace' : ChartedSpace (B × F) (TotalSpace F E) where
atlas := (fun e : Trivialization F (π F E) => e.toPartialHomeomorph) '' trivializationAtlas F E
chartAt x := (trivializationAt F E x.proj).toPartialHomeomorph
mem_chart_source x :=
(trivializationAt F E x.proj).mem_source.mpr (mem_baseSet_trivializationAt F E x.proj)
chart_mem_atlas _ := mem_image_of_mem _ (trivialization_mem_atlas F E _)
#align fiber_bundle.charted_space FiberBundle.chartedSpace'
theorem FiberBundle.chartedSpace'_chartAt (x : TotalSpace F E) :
chartAt (B × F) x = (trivializationAt F E x.proj).toPartialHomeomorph :=
rfl
--attribute [local reducible] ModelProd
instance FiberBundle.chartedSpace : ChartedSpace (ModelProd HB F) (TotalSpace F E) :=
ChartedSpace.comp _ (B × F) _
#align fiber_bundle.charted_space' FiberBundle.chartedSpace
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/VectorBundle/Basic.lean | 108 | 114 | theorem FiberBundle.chartedSpace_chartAt (x : TotalSpace F E) :
chartAt (ModelProd HB F) x =
(trivializationAt F E x.proj).toPartialHomeomorph ≫ₕ
(chartAt HB x.proj).prod (PartialHomeomorph.refl F) := by |
dsimp only [chartAt_comp, prodChartedSpace_chartAt, FiberBundle.chartedSpace'_chartAt,
chartAt_self_eq]
rw [Trivialization.coe_coe, Trivialization.coe_fst' _ (mem_baseSet_trivializationAt F E x.proj)]
|
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountableInter
set_option autoImplicit true
open Function Set Filter
class HasCountableSeparatingOn (α : Type*) (p : Set α → Prop) (t : Set α) : Prop where
exists_countable_separating : ∃ S : Set (Set α), S.Countable ∧ (∀ s ∈ S, p s) ∧
∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ t, (∀ s ∈ S, x ∈ s ↔ y ∈ s) → x = y
theorem exists_countable_separating (α : Type*) (p : Set α → Prop) (t : Set α)
[h : HasCountableSeparatingOn α p t] :
∃ S : Set (Set α), S.Countable ∧ (∀ s ∈ S, p s) ∧
∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ t, (∀ s ∈ S, x ∈ s ↔ y ∈ s) → x = y :=
h.1
theorem exists_nonempty_countable_separating (α : Type*) {p : Set α → Prop} {s₀} (hp : p s₀)
(t : Set α) [HasCountableSeparatingOn α p t] :
∃ S : Set (Set α), S.Nonempty ∧ S.Countable ∧ (∀ s ∈ S, p s) ∧
∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ t, (∀ s ∈ S, x ∈ s ↔ y ∈ s) → x = y :=
let ⟨S, hSc, hSp, hSt⟩ := exists_countable_separating α p t
⟨insert s₀ S, insert_nonempty _ _, hSc.insert _, forall_insert_of_forall hSp hp,
fun x hx y hy hxy ↦ hSt x hx y hy <| forall_of_forall_insert hxy⟩
theorem exists_seq_separating (α : Type*) {p : Set α → Prop} {s₀} (hp : p s₀) (t : Set α)
[HasCountableSeparatingOn α p t] :
∃ S : ℕ → Set α, (∀ n, p (S n)) ∧ ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ t, (∀ n, x ∈ S n ↔ y ∈ S n) → x = y := by
rcases exists_nonempty_countable_separating α hp t with ⟨S, hSne, hSc, hS⟩
rcases hSc.exists_eq_range hSne with ⟨S, rfl⟩
use S
simpa only [forall_mem_range] using hS
theorem HasCountableSeparatingOn.mono {α} {p₁ p₂ : Set α → Prop} {t₁ t₂ : Set α}
[h : HasCountableSeparatingOn α p₁ t₁] (hp : ∀ s, p₁ s → p₂ s) (ht : t₂ ⊆ t₁) :
HasCountableSeparatingOn α p₂ t₂ where
exists_countable_separating :=
let ⟨S, hSc, hSp, hSt⟩ := h.1
⟨S, hSc, fun s hs ↦ hp s (hSp s hs), fun x hx y hy ↦ hSt x (ht hx) y (ht hy)⟩
theorem HasCountableSeparatingOn.of_subtype {α : Type*} {p : Set α → Prop} {t : Set α}
{q : Set t → Prop} [h : HasCountableSeparatingOn t q univ]
(hpq : ∀ U, q U → ∃ V, p V ∧ (↑) ⁻¹' V = U) : HasCountableSeparatingOn α p t := by
rcases h.1 with ⟨S, hSc, hSq, hS⟩
choose! V hpV hV using fun s hs ↦ hpq s (hSq s hs)
refine ⟨⟨V '' S, hSc.image _, forall_mem_image.2 hpV, fun x hx y hy h ↦ ?_⟩⟩
refine congr_arg Subtype.val (hS ⟨x, hx⟩ trivial ⟨y, hy⟩ trivial fun U hU ↦ ?_)
rw [← hV U hU]
exact h _ (mem_image_of_mem _ hU)
theorem HasCountableSeparatingOn.subtype_iff {α : Type*} {p : Set α → Prop} {t : Set α} :
HasCountableSeparatingOn t (fun u ↦ ∃ v, p v ∧ (↑) ⁻¹' v = u) univ ↔
HasCountableSeparatingOn α p t := by
constructor <;> intro h
· exact h.of_subtype $ fun s ↦ id
rcases h with ⟨S, Sct, Sp, hS⟩
use {Subtype.val ⁻¹' s | s ∈ S}, Sct.image _, ?_, ?_
· rintro u ⟨t, tS, rfl⟩
exact ⟨t, Sp _ tS, rfl⟩
rintro x - y - hxy
exact Subtype.val_injective $ hS _ (Subtype.coe_prop _) _ (Subtype.coe_prop _)
fun s hs ↦ hxy (Subtype.val ⁻¹' s) ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
namespace Filter
variable {l : Filter α} [CountableInterFilter l] {f g : α → β}
theorem exists_subset_subsingleton_mem_of_forall_separating (p : Set α → Prop)
{s : Set α} [h : HasCountableSeparatingOn α p s] (hs : s ∈ l)
(hl : ∀ U, p U → U ∈ l ∨ Uᶜ ∈ l) : ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.Subsingleton ∧ t ∈ l := by
rcases h.1 with ⟨S, hSc, hSp, hS⟩
refine ⟨s ∩ ⋂₀ (S ∩ l.sets) ∩ ⋂ (U ∈ S) (_ : Uᶜ ∈ l), Uᶜ, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· exact fun _ h ↦ h.1.1
· intro x hx y hy
simp only [mem_sInter, mem_inter_iff, mem_iInter, mem_compl_iff] at hx hy
refine hS x hx.1.1 y hy.1.1 (fun s hsS ↦ ?_)
cases hl s (hSp s hsS) with
| inl hsl => simp only [hx.1.2 s ⟨hsS, hsl⟩, hy.1.2 s ⟨hsS, hsl⟩]
| inr hsl => simp only [hx.2 s hsS hsl, hy.2 s hsS hsl]
· exact inter_mem
(inter_mem hs ((countable_sInter_mem (hSc.mono inter_subset_left)).2 fun _ h ↦ h.2))
((countable_bInter_mem hSc).2 fun U hU ↦ iInter_mem.2 id)
theorem exists_mem_singleton_mem_of_mem_of_nonempty_of_forall_separating (p : Set α → Prop)
{s : Set α} [HasCountableSeparatingOn α p s] (hs : s ∈ l) (hne : s.Nonempty)
(hl : ∀ U, p U → U ∈ l ∨ Uᶜ ∈ l) : ∃ a ∈ s, {a} ∈ l := by
rcases exists_subset_subsingleton_mem_of_forall_separating p hs hl with ⟨t, hts, ht, htl⟩
rcases ht.eq_empty_or_singleton with rfl | ⟨x, rfl⟩
· exact hne.imp fun a ha ↦ ⟨ha, mem_of_superset htl (empty_subset _)⟩
· exact ⟨x, hts rfl, htl⟩
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/CountableSeparatingOn.lean | 182 | 188 | theorem exists_singleton_mem_of_mem_of_forall_separating [Nonempty α] (p : Set α → Prop)
{s : Set α} [HasCountableSeparatingOn α p s] (hs : s ∈ l) (hl : ∀ U, p U → U ∈ l ∨ Uᶜ ∈ l) :
∃ a, {a} ∈ l := by |
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | hne
· exact ‹Nonempty α›.elim fun a ↦ ⟨a, mem_of_superset hs (empty_subset _)⟩
· exact (exists_mem_singleton_mem_of_mem_of_nonempty_of_forall_separating p hs hne hl).imp fun _ ↦
And.right
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Projection
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.PerpBisector
import Mathlib.Algebra.QuadraticDiscriminant
#align_import geometry.euclidean.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2de9c37fa71dde2f1c6feff19876dd6a7b1519f0"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open RealInnerProductSpace
namespace EuclideanGeometry
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
variable [NormedAddTorsor V P]
theorem dist_left_midpoint_eq_dist_right_midpoint (p1 p2 : P) :
dist p1 (midpoint ℝ p1 p2) = dist p2 (midpoint ℝ p1 p2) := by
rw [dist_left_midpoint (𝕜 := ℝ) p1 p2, dist_right_midpoint (𝕜 := ℝ) p1 p2]
#align euclidean_geometry.dist_left_midpoint_eq_dist_right_midpoint EuclideanGeometry.dist_left_midpoint_eq_dist_right_midpoint
theorem inner_weightedVSub {ι₁ : Type*} {s₁ : Finset ι₁} {w₁ : ι₁ → ℝ} (p₁ : ι₁ → P)
(h₁ : ∑ i ∈ s₁, w₁ i = 0) {ι₂ : Type*} {s₂ : Finset ι₂} {w₂ : ι₂ → ℝ} (p₂ : ι₂ → P)
(h₂ : ∑ i ∈ s₂, w₂ i = 0) :
⟪s₁.weightedVSub p₁ w₁, s₂.weightedVSub p₂ w₂⟫ =
(-∑ i₁ ∈ s₁, ∑ i₂ ∈ s₂, w₁ i₁ * w₂ i₂ * (dist (p₁ i₁) (p₂ i₂) * dist (p₁ i₁) (p₂ i₂))) /
2 := by
rw [Finset.weightedVSub_apply, Finset.weightedVSub_apply,
inner_sum_smul_sum_smul_of_sum_eq_zero _ h₁ _ h₂]
simp_rw [vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
rcongr (i₁ i₂) <;> rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V (p₁ i₁) (p₂ i₂)]
#align euclidean_geometry.inner_weighted_vsub EuclideanGeometry.inner_weightedVSub
theorem dist_affineCombination {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {w₁ w₂ : ι → ℝ} (p : ι → P)
(h₁ : ∑ i ∈ s, w₁ i = 1) (h₂ : ∑ i ∈ s, w₂ i = 1) : by
have a₁ := s.affineCombination ℝ p w₁
have a₂ := s.affineCombination ℝ p w₂
exact dist a₁ a₂ * dist a₁ a₂ = (-∑ i₁ ∈ s, ∑ i₂ ∈ s,
(w₁ - w₂) i₁ * (w₁ - w₂) i₂ * (dist (p i₁) (p i₂) * dist (p i₁) (p i₂))) / 2 := by
dsimp only
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V (s.affineCombination ℝ p w₁) (s.affineCombination ℝ p w₂), ←
@inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ, Finset.affineCombination_vsub]
have h : (∑ i ∈ s, (w₁ - w₂) i) = 0 := by
simp_rw [Pi.sub_apply, Finset.sum_sub_distrib, h₁, h₂, sub_self]
exact inner_weightedVSub p h p h
#align euclidean_geometry.dist_affine_combination EuclideanGeometry.dist_affineCombination
-- Porting note: `inner_vsub_vsub_of_dist_eq_of_dist_eq` moved to `PerpendicularBisector`
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Basic.lean | 112 | 117 | theorem dist_smul_vadd_sq (r : ℝ) (v : V) (p₁ p₂ : P) :
dist (r • v +ᵥ p₁) p₂ * dist (r • v +ᵥ p₁) p₂ =
⟪v, v⟫ * r * r + 2 * ⟪v, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫ * r + ⟪p₁ -ᵥ p₂, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫ := by |
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V _ p₂, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, vadd_vsub_assoc,
real_inner_add_add_self, real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_smul_right]
ring
|
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Clique
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Setoid.Partition
import Mathlib.Order.Antichain
#align_import combinatorics.simple_graph.coloring from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
open Fintype Function
universe u v
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type u} (G : SimpleGraph V) {n : ℕ}
abbrev Coloring (α : Type v) := G →g (⊤ : SimpleGraph α)
#align simple_graph.coloring SimpleGraph.Coloring
variable {G} {α β : Type*} (C : G.Coloring α)
theorem Coloring.valid {v w : V} (h : G.Adj v w) : C v ≠ C w :=
C.map_rel h
#align simple_graph.coloring.valid SimpleGraph.Coloring.valid
@[match_pattern]
def Coloring.mk (color : V → α) (valid : ∀ {v w : V}, G.Adj v w → color v ≠ color w) :
G.Coloring α :=
⟨color, @valid⟩
#align simple_graph.coloring.mk SimpleGraph.Coloring.mk
def Coloring.colorClass (c : α) : Set V := { v : V | C v = c }
#align simple_graph.coloring.color_class SimpleGraph.Coloring.colorClass
def Coloring.colorClasses : Set (Set V) := (Setoid.ker C).classes
#align simple_graph.coloring.color_classes SimpleGraph.Coloring.colorClasses
theorem Coloring.mem_colorClass (v : V) : v ∈ C.colorClass (C v) := rfl
#align simple_graph.coloring.mem_color_class SimpleGraph.Coloring.mem_colorClass
theorem Coloring.colorClasses_isPartition : Setoid.IsPartition C.colorClasses :=
Setoid.isPartition_classes (Setoid.ker C)
#align simple_graph.coloring.color_classes_is_partition SimpleGraph.Coloring.colorClasses_isPartition
theorem Coloring.mem_colorClasses {v : V} : C.colorClass (C v) ∈ C.colorClasses :=
⟨v, rfl⟩
#align simple_graph.coloring.mem_color_classes SimpleGraph.Coloring.mem_colorClasses
theorem Coloring.colorClasses_finite [Finite α] : C.colorClasses.Finite :=
Setoid.finite_classes_ker _
#align simple_graph.coloring.color_classes_finite SimpleGraph.Coloring.colorClasses_finite
theorem Coloring.card_colorClasses_le [Fintype α] [Fintype C.colorClasses] :
Fintype.card C.colorClasses ≤ Fintype.card α := by
simp [colorClasses]
-- Porting note: brute force instance declaration `[Fintype (Setoid.classes (Setoid.ker C))]`
haveI : Fintype (Setoid.classes (Setoid.ker C)) := by assumption
convert Setoid.card_classes_ker_le C
#align simple_graph.coloring.card_color_classes_le SimpleGraph.Coloring.card_colorClasses_le
theorem Coloring.not_adj_of_mem_colorClass {c : α} {v w : V} (hv : v ∈ C.colorClass c)
(hw : w ∈ C.colorClass c) : ¬G.Adj v w := fun h => C.valid h (Eq.trans hv (Eq.symm hw))
#align simple_graph.coloring.not_adj_of_mem_color_class SimpleGraph.Coloring.not_adj_of_mem_colorClass
theorem Coloring.color_classes_independent (c : α) : IsAntichain G.Adj (C.colorClass c) :=
fun _ hv _ hw _ => C.not_adj_of_mem_colorClass hv hw
#align simple_graph.coloring.color_classes_independent SimpleGraph.Coloring.color_classes_independent
-- TODO make this computable
noncomputable instance [Fintype V] [Fintype α] : Fintype (Coloring G α) := by
classical
change Fintype (RelHom G.Adj (⊤ : SimpleGraph α).Adj)
apply Fintype.ofInjective _ RelHom.coe_fn_injective
variable (G)
def Colorable (n : ℕ) : Prop := Nonempty (G.Coloring (Fin n))
#align simple_graph.colorable SimpleGraph.Colorable
def coloringOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty V] : G.Coloring α :=
Coloring.mk isEmptyElim fun {v} => isEmptyElim v
#align simple_graph.coloring_of_is_empty SimpleGraph.coloringOfIsEmpty
theorem colorable_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty V] (n : ℕ) : G.Colorable n :=
⟨G.coloringOfIsEmpty⟩
#align simple_graph.colorable_of_is_empty SimpleGraph.colorable_of_isEmpty
theorem isEmpty_of_colorable_zero (h : G.Colorable 0) : IsEmpty V := by
constructor
intro v
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := h.some v
exact Nat.not_lt_zero _ hi
#align simple_graph.is_empty_of_colorable_zero SimpleGraph.isEmpty_of_colorable_zero
def selfColoring : G.Coloring V := Coloring.mk id fun {_ _} => G.ne_of_adj
#align simple_graph.self_coloring SimpleGraph.selfColoring
noncomputable def chromaticNumber : ℕ∞ := ⨅ n ∈ setOf G.Colorable, (n : ℕ∞)
#align simple_graph.chromatic_number SimpleGraph.chromaticNumber
lemma chromaticNumber_eq_biInf {G : SimpleGraph V} :
G.chromaticNumber = ⨅ n ∈ setOf G.Colorable, (n : ℕ∞) := rfl
lemma chromaticNumber_eq_iInf {G : SimpleGraph V} :
G.chromaticNumber = ⨅ n : {m | G.Colorable m}, (n : ℕ∞) := by
rw [chromaticNumber, iInf_subtype]
lemma Colorable.chromaticNumber_eq_sInf {G : SimpleGraph V} {n} (h : G.Colorable n) :
G.chromaticNumber = sInf {n' : ℕ | G.Colorable n'} := by
rw [ENat.coe_sInf, chromaticNumber]
exact ⟨_, h⟩
def recolorOfEmbedding {α β : Type*} (f : α ↪ β) : G.Coloring α ↪ G.Coloring β where
toFun C := (Embedding.completeGraph f).toHom.comp C
inj' := by -- this was strangely painful; seems like missing lemmas about embeddings
intro C C' h
dsimp only at h
ext v
apply (Embedding.completeGraph f).inj'
change ((Embedding.completeGraph f).toHom.comp C) v = _
rw [h]
rfl
#align simple_graph.recolor_of_embedding SimpleGraph.recolorOfEmbedding
@[simp] lemma coe_recolorOfEmbedding (f : α ↪ β) :
⇑(G.recolorOfEmbedding f) = (Embedding.completeGraph f).toHom.comp := rfl
def recolorOfEquiv {α β : Type*} (f : α ≃ β) : G.Coloring α ≃ G.Coloring β where
toFun := G.recolorOfEmbedding f.toEmbedding
invFun := G.recolorOfEmbedding f.symm.toEmbedding
left_inv C := by
ext v
apply Equiv.symm_apply_apply
right_inv C := by
ext v
apply Equiv.apply_symm_apply
#align simple_graph.recolor_of_equiv SimpleGraph.recolorOfEquiv
@[simp] lemma coe_recolorOfEquiv (f : α ≃ β) :
⇑(G.recolorOfEquiv f) = (Embedding.completeGraph f).toHom.comp := rfl
noncomputable def recolorOfCardLE {α β : Type*} [Fintype α] [Fintype β]
(hn : Fintype.card α ≤ Fintype.card β) : G.Coloring α ↪ G.Coloring β :=
G.recolorOfEmbedding <| (Function.Embedding.nonempty_of_card_le hn).some
#align simple_graph.recolor_of_card_le SimpleGraph.recolorOfCardLE
@[simp] lemma coe_recolorOfCardLE [Fintype α] [Fintype β] (hαβ : card α ≤ card β) :
⇑(G.recolorOfCardLE hαβ) =
(Embedding.completeGraph (Embedding.nonempty_of_card_le hαβ).some).toHom.comp := rfl
variable {G}
theorem Colorable.mono {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) (hc : G.Colorable n) : G.Colorable m :=
⟨G.recolorOfCardLE (by simp [h]) hc.some⟩
#align simple_graph.colorable.mono SimpleGraph.Colorable.mono
theorem Coloring.colorable [Fintype α] (C : G.Coloring α) : G.Colorable (Fintype.card α) :=
⟨G.recolorOfCardLE (by simp) C⟩
#align simple_graph.coloring.to_colorable SimpleGraph.Coloring.colorable
theorem colorable_of_fintype (G : SimpleGraph V) [Fintype V] : G.Colorable (Fintype.card V) :=
G.selfColoring.colorable
#align simple_graph.colorable_of_fintype SimpleGraph.colorable_of_fintype
noncomputable def Colorable.toColoring [Fintype α] {n : ℕ} (hc : G.Colorable n)
(hn : n ≤ Fintype.card α) : G.Coloring α := by
rw [← Fintype.card_fin n] at hn
exact G.recolorOfCardLE hn hc.some
#align simple_graph.colorable.to_coloring SimpleGraph.Colorable.toColoring
theorem Colorable.of_embedding {V' : Type*} {G' : SimpleGraph V'} (f : G ↪g G') {n : ℕ}
(h : G'.Colorable n) : G.Colorable n :=
⟨(h.toColoring (by simp)).comp f⟩
#align simple_graph.colorable.of_embedding SimpleGraph.Colorable.of_embedding
theorem colorable_iff_exists_bdd_nat_coloring (n : ℕ) :
G.Colorable n ↔ ∃ C : G.Coloring ℕ, ∀ v, C v < n := by
constructor
· rintro hc
have C : G.Coloring (Fin n) := hc.toColoring (by simp)
let f := Embedding.completeGraph (@Fin.valEmbedding n)
use f.toHom.comp C
intro v
cases' C with color valid
exact Fin.is_lt (color v)
· rintro ⟨C, Cf⟩
refine ⟨Coloring.mk ?_ ?_⟩
· exact fun v => ⟨C v, Cf v⟩
· rintro v w hvw
simp only [Fin.mk_eq_mk, Ne]
exact C.valid hvw
#align simple_graph.colorable_iff_exists_bdd_nat_coloring SimpleGraph.colorable_iff_exists_bdd_nat_coloring
theorem colorable_set_nonempty_of_colorable {n : ℕ} (hc : G.Colorable n) :
{ n : ℕ | G.Colorable n }.Nonempty :=
⟨n, hc⟩
#align simple_graph.colorable_set_nonempty_of_colorable SimpleGraph.colorable_set_nonempty_of_colorable
theorem chromaticNumber_bddBelow : BddBelow { n : ℕ | G.Colorable n } :=
⟨0, fun _ _ => zero_le _⟩
#align simple_graph.chromatic_number_bdd_below SimpleGraph.chromaticNumber_bddBelow
theorem Colorable.chromaticNumber_le {n : ℕ} (hc : G.Colorable n) : G.chromaticNumber ≤ n := by
rw [hc.chromaticNumber_eq_sInf]
norm_cast
apply csInf_le chromaticNumber_bddBelow
exact hc
#align simple_graph.chromatic_number_le_of_colorable SimpleGraph.Colorable.chromaticNumber_le
theorem chromaticNumber_ne_top_iff_exists : G.chromaticNumber ≠ ⊤ ↔ ∃ n, G.Colorable n := by
rw [chromaticNumber]
convert_to ⨅ n : {m | G.Colorable m}, (n : ℕ∞) ≠ ⊤ ↔ _
· rw [iInf_subtype]
rw [← lt_top_iff_ne_top, ENat.iInf_coe_lt_top]
simp
theorem chromaticNumber_le_iff_colorable {n : ℕ} : G.chromaticNumber ≤ n ↔ G.Colorable n := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, Colorable.chromaticNumber_le⟩
have : G.chromaticNumber ≠ ⊤ := (trans h (WithTop.coe_lt_top n)).ne
rw [chromaticNumber_ne_top_iff_exists] at this
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := this
rw [hm.chromaticNumber_eq_sInf, Nat.cast_le] at h
have := Nat.sInf_mem (⟨m, hm⟩ : {n' | G.Colorable n'}.Nonempty)
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq] at this
exact this.mono h
@[deprecated Colorable.chromaticNumber_le (since := "2024-03-21")]
theorem chromaticNumber_le_card [Fintype α] (C : G.Coloring α) :
G.chromaticNumber ≤ Fintype.card α := C.colorable.chromaticNumber_le
#align simple_graph.chromatic_number_le_card SimpleGraph.chromaticNumber_le_card
theorem colorable_chromaticNumber {m : ℕ} (hc : G.Colorable m) :
G.Colorable (ENat.toNat G.chromaticNumber) := by
classical
rw [hc.chromaticNumber_eq_sInf, Nat.sInf_def]
· apply Nat.find_spec
· exact colorable_set_nonempty_of_colorable hc
#align simple_graph.colorable_chromatic_number SimpleGraph.colorable_chromaticNumber
theorem colorable_chromaticNumber_of_fintype (G : SimpleGraph V) [Finite V] :
G.Colorable (ENat.toNat G.chromaticNumber) := by
cases nonempty_fintype V
exact colorable_chromaticNumber G.colorable_of_fintype
#align simple_graph.colorable_chromatic_number_of_fintype SimpleGraph.colorable_chromaticNumber_of_fintype
theorem chromaticNumber_le_one_of_subsingleton (G : SimpleGraph V) [Subsingleton V] :
G.chromaticNumber ≤ 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, chromaticNumber_le_iff_colorable]
refine ⟨Coloring.mk (fun _ => 0) ?_⟩
intros v w
cases Subsingleton.elim v w
simp
#align simple_graph.chromatic_number_le_one_of_subsingleton SimpleGraph.chromaticNumber_le_one_of_subsingleton
theorem chromaticNumber_eq_zero_of_isempty (G : SimpleGraph V) [IsEmpty V] :
G.chromaticNumber = 0 := by
rw [← nonpos_iff_eq_zero, ← Nat.cast_zero, chromaticNumber_le_iff_colorable]
apply colorable_of_isEmpty
#align simple_graph.chromatic_number_eq_zero_of_isempty SimpleGraph.chromaticNumber_eq_zero_of_isempty
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Coloring.lean | 334 | 338 | theorem isEmpty_of_chromaticNumber_eq_zero (G : SimpleGraph V) [Finite V]
(h : G.chromaticNumber = 0) : IsEmpty V := by |
have h' := G.colorable_chromaticNumber_of_fintype
rw [h] at h'
exact G.isEmpty_of_colorable_zero h'
|
import Mathlib.Dynamics.Ergodic.MeasurePreserving
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SimpleFunc
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.MutuallySingular
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Count
import Mathlib.Topology.IndicatorConstPointwise
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Real
#align_import measure_theory.integral.lebesgue from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c14c8fcde993801fca8946b0d80131a1a81d1520"
assert_not_exists NormedSpace
set_option autoImplicit true
noncomputable section
open Set hiding restrict restrict_apply
open Filter ENNReal
open Function (support)
open scoped Classical
open Topology NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
section Lintegral
open SimpleFunc
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ ν : Measure α}
irreducible_def lintegral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨆ (g : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) (_ : ⇑g ≤ f), g.lintegral μ
#align measure_theory.lintegral MeasureTheory.lintegral
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3 "∫⁻ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => lintegral μ r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3 "∫⁻ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => lintegral volume f) => r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3"∫⁻ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => lintegral (Measure.restrict μ s) r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3"∫⁻ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => lintegral (Measure.restrict volume s) f) => r
theorem SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = f.lintegral μ := by
rw [MeasureTheory.lintegral]
exact le_antisymm (iSup₂_le fun g hg => lintegral_mono hg <| le_rfl)
(le_iSup₂_of_le f le_rfl le_rfl)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.lintegral_eq_lintegral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral
@[mono]
theorem lintegral_mono' {m : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃μ ν : Measure α⦄ (hμν : μ ≤ ν) ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄
(hfg : f ≤ g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂ν := by
rw [lintegral, lintegral]
exact iSup_mono fun φ => iSup_mono' fun hφ => ⟨le_trans hφ hfg, lintegral_mono (le_refl φ) hμν⟩
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono'
-- workaround for the known eta-reduction issue with `@[gcongr]`
@[gcongr] theorem lintegral_mono_fn' ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄ (hfg : ∀ x, f x ≤ g x) (h2 : μ ≤ ν) :
lintegral μ f ≤ lintegral ν g :=
lintegral_mono' h2 hfg
theorem lintegral_mono ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄ (hfg : f ≤ g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' (le_refl μ) hfg
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono
-- workaround for the known eta-reduction issue with `@[gcongr]`
@[gcongr] theorem lintegral_mono_fn ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄ (hfg : ∀ x, f x ≤ g x) :
lintegral μ f ≤ lintegral μ g :=
lintegral_mono hfg
theorem lintegral_mono_nnreal {f g : α → ℝ≥0} (h : f ≤ g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono fun a => ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (h a)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_nnreal MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_nnreal
theorem iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨆ (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) (_ : Measurable g) (_ : g ≤ f), ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
apply le_antisymm
· exact iSup_le fun i => iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le fun h'i => lintegral_mono h'i
· rw [lintegral]
refine iSup₂_le fun i hi => le_iSup₂_of_le i i.measurable <| le_iSup_of_le hi ?_
exact le_of_eq (i.lintegral_eq_lintegral _).symm
#align measure_theory.supr_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral MeasureTheory.iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral
theorem lintegral_mono_set {_ : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃μ : Measure α⦄ {s t : Set α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hst : s ⊆ t) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' (Measure.restrict_mono hst (le_refl μ)) (le_refl f)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_set MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_set
theorem lintegral_mono_set' {_ : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃μ : Measure α⦄ {s t : Set α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hst : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' (Measure.restrict_mono' hst (le_refl μ)) (le_refl f)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_set' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_set'
theorem monotone_lintegral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : Monotone (lintegral μ) :=
lintegral_mono
#align measure_theory.monotone_lintegral MeasureTheory.monotone_lintegral
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_const (c : ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ _, c ∂μ = c * μ univ := by
rw [← SimpleFunc.const_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral, SimpleFunc.coe_const]
rfl
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const MeasureTheory.lintegral_const
theorem lintegral_zero : ∫⁻ _ : α, 0 ∂μ = 0 := by simp
#align measure_theory.lintegral_zero MeasureTheory.lintegral_zero
theorem lintegral_zero_fun : lintegral μ (0 : α → ℝ≥0∞) = 0 :=
lintegral_zero
#align measure_theory.lintegral_zero_fun MeasureTheory.lintegral_zero_fun
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem lintegral_one : ∫⁻ _, (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ = μ univ := by rw [lintegral_const, one_mul]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_one MeasureTheory.lintegral_one
theorem set_lintegral_const (s : Set α) (c : ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ _ in s, c ∂μ = c * μ s := by
rw [lintegral_const, Measure.restrict_apply_univ]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_const MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_const
theorem set_lintegral_one (s) : ∫⁻ _ in s, 1 ∂μ = μ s := by rw [set_lintegral_const, one_mul]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_one MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_one
theorem set_lintegral_const_lt_top [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (s : Set α) {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ _ in s, c ∂μ < ∞ := by
rw [lintegral_const]
exact ENNReal.mul_lt_top hc (measure_ne_top (μ.restrict s) univ)
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_const_lt_top MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_const_lt_top
theorem lintegral_const_lt_top [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) : ∫⁻ _, c ∂μ < ∞ := by
simpa only [Measure.restrict_univ] using set_lintegral_const_lt_top (univ : Set α) hc
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_lt_top MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_lt_top
section
variable (μ)
theorem exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∃ g : α → ℝ≥0∞, Measurable g ∧ g ≤ f ∧ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rcases eq_or_ne (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) 0 with h₀ | h₀
· exact ⟨0, measurable_zero, zero_le f, h₀.trans lintegral_zero.symm⟩
rcases exists_seq_strictMono_tendsto' h₀.bot_lt with ⟨L, _, hLf, hL_tendsto⟩
have : ∀ n, ∃ g : α → ℝ≥0∞, Measurable g ∧ g ≤ f ∧ L n < ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
intro n
simpa only [← iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral f, lt_iSup_iff, exists_prop] using
(hLf n).2
choose g hgm hgf hLg using this
refine
⟨fun x => ⨆ n, g n x, measurable_iSup hgm, fun x => iSup_le fun n => hgf n x, le_antisymm ?_ ?_⟩
· refine le_of_tendsto' hL_tendsto fun n => (hLg n).le.trans <| lintegral_mono fun x => ?_
exact le_iSup (fun n => g n x) n
· exact lintegral_mono fun x => iSup_le fun n => hgf n x
#align measure_theory.exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq MeasureTheory.exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq
end
theorem lintegral_eq_nnreal {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ =
⨆ (φ : α →ₛ ℝ≥0) (_ : ∀ x, ↑(φ x) ≤ f x), (φ.map ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞)).lintegral μ := by
rw [lintegral]
refine
le_antisymm (iSup₂_le fun φ hφ => ?_) (iSup_mono' fun φ => ⟨φ.map ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞), le_rfl⟩)
by_cases h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, φ a ≠ ∞
· let ψ := φ.map ENNReal.toNNReal
replace h : ψ.map ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) =ᵐ[μ] φ := h.mono fun a => ENNReal.coe_toNNReal
have : ∀ x, ↑(ψ x) ≤ f x := fun x => le_trans ENNReal.coe_toNNReal_le_self (hφ x)
exact
le_iSup_of_le (φ.map ENNReal.toNNReal) (le_iSup_of_le this (ge_of_eq <| lintegral_congr h))
· have h_meas : μ (φ ⁻¹' {∞}) ≠ 0 := mt measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem.1 h
refine le_trans le_top (ge_of_eq <| (iSup_eq_top _).2 fun b hb => ?_)
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n : ℕ, b < n * μ (φ ⁻¹' {∞}) := exists_nat_mul_gt h_meas (ne_of_lt hb)
use (const α (n : ℝ≥0)).restrict (φ ⁻¹' {∞})
simp only [lt_iSup_iff, exists_prop, coe_restrict, φ.measurableSet_preimage, coe_const,
ENNReal.coe_indicator, map_coe_ennreal_restrict, SimpleFunc.map_const, ENNReal.coe_natCast,
restrict_const_lintegral]
refine ⟨indicator_le fun x hx => le_trans ?_ (hφ _), hn⟩
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_singleton_iff] at hx
simp only [hx, le_top]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_nnreal MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_nnreal
theorem exists_simpleFunc_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ φ : α →ₛ ℝ≥0,
(∀ x, ↑(φ x) ≤ f x) ∧
∀ ψ : α →ₛ ℝ≥0, (∀ x, ↑(ψ x) ≤ f x) → (map (↑) (ψ - φ)).lintegral μ < ε := by
rw [lintegral_eq_nnreal] at h
have := ENNReal.lt_add_right h hε
erw [ENNReal.biSup_add] at this <;> [skip; exact ⟨0, fun x => zero_le _⟩]
simp_rw [lt_iSup_iff, iSup_lt_iff, iSup_le_iff] at this
rcases this with ⟨φ, hle : ∀ x, ↑(φ x) ≤ f x, b, hbφ, hb⟩
refine ⟨φ, hle, fun ψ hψ => ?_⟩
have : (map (↑) φ).lintegral μ ≠ ∞ := ne_top_of_le_ne_top h (by exact le_iSup₂ (α := ℝ≥0∞) φ hle)
rw [← ENNReal.add_lt_add_iff_left this, ← add_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.map_add @ENNReal.coe_add]
refine (hb _ fun x => le_trans ?_ (max_le (hle x) (hψ x))).trans_lt hbφ
norm_cast
simp only [add_apply, sub_apply, add_tsub_eq_max]
rfl
#align measure_theory.exists_simple_func_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos MeasureTheory.exists_simpleFunc_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos
theorem iSup_lintegral_le {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨆ i, ∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, ⨆ i, f i a ∂μ := by
simp only [← iSup_apply]
exact (monotone_lintegral μ).le_map_iSup
#align measure_theory.supr_lintegral_le MeasureTheory.iSup_lintegral_le
theorem iSup₂_lintegral_le {ι : Sort*} {ι' : ι → Sort*} (f : ∀ i, ι' i → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨆ (i) (j), ∫⁻ a, f i j a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, ⨆ (i) (j), f i j a ∂μ := by
convert (monotone_lintegral μ).le_map_iSup₂ f with a
simp only [iSup_apply]
#align measure_theory.supr₂_lintegral_le MeasureTheory.iSup₂_lintegral_le
theorem le_iInf_lintegral {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ i, f i a ∂μ ≤ ⨅ i, ∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ := by
simp only [← iInf_apply]
exact (monotone_lintegral μ).map_iInf_le
#align measure_theory.le_infi_lintegral MeasureTheory.le_iInf_lintegral
theorem le_iInf₂_lintegral {ι : Sort*} {ι' : ι → Sort*} (f : ∀ i, ι' i → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ (i) (h : ι' i), f i h a ∂μ ≤ ⨅ (i) (h : ι' i), ∫⁻ a, f i h a ∂μ := by
convert (monotone_lintegral μ).map_iInf₂_le f with a
simp only [iInf_apply]
#align measure_theory.le_infi₂_lintegral MeasureTheory.le_iInf₂_lintegral
theorem lintegral_mono_ae {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, f a ≤ g a) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rcases exists_measurable_superset_of_null h with ⟨t, hts, ht, ht0⟩
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∉ t := measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem.1 ht0
rw [lintegral, lintegral]
refine iSup_le fun s => iSup_le fun hfs => le_iSup_of_le (s.restrict tᶜ) <| le_iSup_of_le ?_ ?_
· intro a
by_cases h : a ∈ t <;>
simp only [restrict_apply s ht.compl, mem_compl_iff, h, not_true, not_false_eq_true,
indicator_of_not_mem, zero_le, not_false_eq_true, indicator_of_mem]
exact le_trans (hfs a) (_root_.by_contradiction fun hnfg => h (hts hnfg))
· refine le_of_eq (SimpleFunc.lintegral_congr <| this.mono fun a hnt => ?_)
by_cases hat : a ∈ t <;> simp only [restrict_apply s ht.compl, mem_compl_iff, hat, not_true,
not_false_eq_true, indicator_of_not_mem, not_false_eq_true, indicator_of_mem]
exact (hnt hat).elim
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_ae MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_ae
theorem set_lintegral_mono_ae {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono_ae <| (ae_restrict_iff <| measurableSet_le hf hg).2 hfg
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_mono_ae MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_mono_ae
theorem set_lintegral_mono {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g)
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
set_lintegral_mono_ae hf hg (ae_of_all _ hfg)
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_mono MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_mono
theorem set_lintegral_mono_ae' {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono_ae <| (ae_restrict_iff' hs).2 hfg
theorem set_lintegral_mono' {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
set_lintegral_mono_ae' hs (ae_of_all _ hfg)
theorem set_lintegral_le_lintegral (s : Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' Measure.restrict_le_self le_rfl
theorem lintegral_congr_ae {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
le_antisymm (lintegral_mono_ae <| h.le) (lintegral_mono_ae <| h.symm.le)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_congr_ae MeasureTheory.lintegral_congr_ae
theorem lintegral_congr {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
simp only [h]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_congr MeasureTheory.lintegral_congr
theorem set_lintegral_congr {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s t : Set α} (h : s =ᵐ[μ] t) :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ := by rw [Measure.restrict_congr_set h]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_congr MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_congr
theorem set_lintegral_congr_fun {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x = g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_congr_ae]
rw [EventuallyEq]
rwa [ae_restrict_iff' hs]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_congr_fun MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_congr_fun
theorem lintegral_ofReal_le_lintegral_nnnorm (f : α → ℝ) :
∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
refine lintegral_mono fun x => ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal ?_
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact le_abs_self (f x)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_of_real_le_lintegral_nnnorm MeasureTheory.lintegral_ofReal_le_lintegral_nnnorm
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (h_nonneg : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) :
∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ := by
apply lintegral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [h_nonneg] with x hx
rw [Real.nnnorm_of_nonneg hx, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal hx]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (h_nonneg : 0 ≤ f) :
∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ :=
lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg (Filter.eventually_of_forall h_nonneg)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_nonneg MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_nonneg
theorem lintegral_iSup {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ n, Measurable (f n)) (h_mono : Monotone f) :
∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
set c : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞ := (↑)
set F := fun a : α => ⨆ n, f n a
refine le_antisymm ?_ (iSup_lintegral_le _)
rw [lintegral_eq_nnreal]
refine iSup_le fun s => iSup_le fun hsf => ?_
refine ENNReal.le_of_forall_lt_one_mul_le fun a ha => ?_
rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_coe.1 ha with ⟨r, rfl, _⟩
have ha : r < 1 := ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.1 ha
let rs := s.map fun a => r * a
have eq_rs : rs.map c = (const α r : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) * map c s := rfl
have eq : ∀ p, rs.map c ⁻¹' {p} = ⋃ n, rs.map c ⁻¹' {p} ∩ { a | p ≤ f n a } := by
intro p
rw [← inter_iUnion]; nth_rw 1 [← inter_univ (map c rs ⁻¹' {p})]
refine Set.ext fun x => and_congr_right fun hx => true_iff_iff.2 ?_
by_cases p_eq : p = 0
· simp [p_eq]
simp only [coe_map, mem_preimage, Function.comp_apply, mem_singleton_iff] at hx
subst hx
have : r * s x ≠ 0 := by rwa [Ne, ← ENNReal.coe_eq_zero]
have : s x ≠ 0 := right_ne_zero_of_mul this
have : (rs.map c) x < ⨆ n : ℕ, f n x := by
refine lt_of_lt_of_le (ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.2 ?_) (hsf x)
suffices r * s x < 1 * s x by simpa
exact mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right ha (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 this)
rcases lt_iSup_iff.1 this with ⟨i, hi⟩
exact mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, le_of_lt hi⟩
have mono : ∀ r : ℝ≥0∞, Monotone fun n => rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a } := by
intro r i j h
refine inter_subset_inter_right _ ?_
simp_rw [subset_def, mem_setOf]
intro x hx
exact le_trans hx (h_mono h x)
have h_meas : ∀ n, MeasurableSet {a : α | map c rs a ≤ f n a} := fun n =>
measurableSet_le (SimpleFunc.measurable _) (hf n)
calc
(r : ℝ≥0∞) * (s.map c).lintegral μ = ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, r * μ (rs.map c ⁻¹' {r}) := by
rw [← const_mul_lintegral, eq_rs, SimpleFunc.lintegral]
_ = ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, r * μ (⋃ n, rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a }) := by
simp only [(eq _).symm]
_ = ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, ⨆ n, r * μ (rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a }) :=
(Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x _ => by
rw [measure_iUnion_eq_iSup (mono x).directed_le, ENNReal.mul_iSup])
_ = ⨆ n, ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, r * μ (rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a }) := by
refine ENNReal.finset_sum_iSup_nat fun p i j h ↦ ?_
gcongr _ * μ ?_
exact mono p h
_ ≤ ⨆ n : ℕ, ((rs.map c).restrict { a | (rs.map c) a ≤ f n a }).lintegral μ := by
gcongr with n
rw [restrict_lintegral _ (h_meas n)]
refine le_of_eq (Finset.sum_congr rfl fun r _ => ?_)
congr 2 with a
refine and_congr_right ?_
simp (config := { contextual := true })
_ ≤ ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
simp only [← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral]
gcongr with n a
simp only [map_apply] at h_meas
simp only [coe_map, restrict_apply _ (h_meas _), (· ∘ ·)]
exact indicator_apply_le id
#align measure_theory.lintegral_supr MeasureTheory.lintegral_iSup
theorem lintegral_iSup' {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ)
(h_mono : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Monotone fun n => f n x) : ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← iSup_apply]
let p : α → (ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) → Prop := fun _ f' => Monotone f'
have hp : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x fun i => f i x := h_mono
have h_ae_seq_mono : Monotone (aeSeq hf p) := by
intro n m hnm x
by_cases hx : x ∈ aeSeqSet hf p
· exact aeSeq.prop_of_mem_aeSeqSet hf hx hnm
· simp only [aeSeq, hx, if_false, le_rfl]
rw [lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.iSup hf hp).symm]
simp_rw [iSup_apply]
rw [lintegral_iSup (aeSeq.measurable hf p) h_ae_seq_mono]
congr with n
exact lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.aeSeq_n_eq_fun_n_ae hf hp n)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_supr' MeasureTheory.lintegral_iSup'
theorem lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} {F : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ) (h_mono : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Monotone fun n => f n x)
(h_tendsto : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 <| F x)) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 <| ∫⁻ x, F x ∂μ) := by
have : Monotone fun n => ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ := fun i j hij =>
lintegral_mono_ae (h_mono.mono fun x hx => hx hij)
suffices key : ∫⁻ x, F x ∂μ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ by
rw [key]
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup this
rw [← lintegral_iSup' hf h_mono]
refine lintegral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [h_mono, h_tendsto] with _ hx_mono hx_tendsto using
tendsto_nhds_unique hx_tendsto (tendsto_atTop_iSup hx_mono)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone MeasureTheory.lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone
theorem lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ :=
calc
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, (eapprox f n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
congr; ext a; rw [iSup_eapprox_apply f hf]
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, (eapprox f n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
apply lintegral_iSup
· measurability
· intro i j h
exact monotone_eapprox f h
_ = ⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ := by
congr; ext n; rw [(eapprox f n).lintegral_eq_lintegral]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_supr_eapprox_lintegral MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral
theorem exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞}
(hε : ε ≠ 0) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ s, μ s < δ → ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ < ε := by
rcases exists_between (pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr hε) with ⟨ε₂, hε₂0, hε₂ε⟩
rcases exists_between hε₂0 with ⟨ε₁, hε₁0, hε₁₂⟩
rcases exists_simpleFunc_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos h hε₁0.ne' with ⟨φ, _, hφ⟩
rcases φ.exists_forall_le with ⟨C, hC⟩
use (ε₂ - ε₁) / C, ENNReal.div_pos_iff.2 ⟨(tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hε₁₂).ne', ENNReal.coe_ne_top⟩
refine fun s hs => lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ hε₂ε
simp only [lintegral_eq_nnreal, iSup_le_iff]
intro ψ hψ
calc
(map (↑) ψ).lintegral (μ.restrict s) ≤
(map (↑) φ).lintegral (μ.restrict s) + (map (↑) (ψ - φ)).lintegral (μ.restrict s) := by
rw [← SimpleFunc.add_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.map_add @ENNReal.coe_add]
refine SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono (fun x => ?_) le_rfl
simp only [add_tsub_eq_max, le_max_right, coe_map, Function.comp_apply, SimpleFunc.coe_add,
SimpleFunc.coe_sub, Pi.add_apply, Pi.sub_apply, ENNReal.coe_max (φ x) (ψ x)]
_ ≤ (map (↑) φ).lintegral (μ.restrict s) + ε₁ := by
gcongr
refine le_trans ?_ (hφ _ hψ).le
exact SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono le_rfl Measure.restrict_le_self
_ ≤ (SimpleFunc.const α (C : ℝ≥0∞)).lintegral (μ.restrict s) + ε₁ := by
gcongr
exact SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono (fun x ↦ ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (hC x)) le_rfl
_ = C * μ s + ε₁ := by
simp only [← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral, coe_const, lintegral_const,
Measure.restrict_apply, MeasurableSet.univ, univ_inter, Function.const]
_ ≤ C * ((ε₂ - ε₁) / C) + ε₁ := by gcongr
_ ≤ ε₂ - ε₁ + ε₁ := by gcongr; apply mul_div_le
_ = ε₂ := tsub_add_cancel_of_le hε₁₂.le
#align measure_theory.exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt MeasureTheory.exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt
theorem tendsto_set_lintegral_zero {ι} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) {l : Filter ι}
{s : ι → Set α} (hl : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫⁻ x in s i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 0) := by
simp only [ENNReal.nhds_zero, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal, mem_Iio,
← pos_iff_ne_zero] at hl ⊢
intro ε ε0
rcases exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt h ε0.ne' with ⟨δ, δ0, hδ⟩
exact (hl δ δ0).mono fun i => hδ _
#align measure_theory.tendsto_set_lintegral_zero MeasureTheory.tendsto_set_lintegral_zero
theorem le_lintegral_add (f g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ := by
simp only [lintegral]
refine ENNReal.biSup_add_biSup_le' (p := fun h : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞ => h ≤ f)
(q := fun h : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞ => h ≤ g) ⟨0, zero_le f⟩ ⟨0, zero_le g⟩ fun f' hf' g' hg' => ?_
exact le_iSup₂_of_le (f' + g') (add_le_add hf' hg') (add_lintegral _ _).ge
#align measure_theory.le_lintegral_add MeasureTheory.le_lintegral_add
-- Use stronger lemmas `lintegral_add_left`/`lintegral_add_right` instead
theorem lintegral_add_aux {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
calc
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ =
∫⁻ a, (⨆ n, (eapprox f n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a) + ⨆ n, (eapprox g n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
simp only [iSup_eapprox_apply, hf, hg]
_ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, (eapprox f n + eapprox g n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
congr; funext a
rw [ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone]
· simp only [Pi.add_apply]
· intro i j h
exact monotone_eapprox _ h a
· intro i j h
exact monotone_eapprox _ h a
_ = ⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ + (eapprox g n).lintegral μ := by
rw [lintegral_iSup]
· congr
funext n
rw [← SimpleFunc.add_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral]
simp only [Pi.add_apply, SimpleFunc.coe_add]
· measurability
· intro i j h a
dsimp
gcongr <;> exact monotone_eapprox _ h _
_ = (⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ) + ⨆ n, (eapprox g n).lintegral μ := by
refine (ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone ?_ ?_).symm <;>
· intro i j h
exact SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono (monotone_eapprox _ h) le_rfl
_ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral hf, lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral hg]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_aux MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_aux
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_add_left {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_lintegral_add _ _)
rcases exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq μ fun a => f a + g a with ⟨φ, hφm, hφ_le, hφ_eq⟩
calc
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, φ a ∂μ := hφ_eq
_ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a + (φ a - f a) ∂μ := lintegral_mono fun a => le_add_tsub
_ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, φ a - f a ∂μ := lintegral_add_aux hf (hφm.sub hf)
_ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
add_le_add_left (lintegral_mono fun a => tsub_le_iff_left.2 <| hφ_le a) _
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_left MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_left
theorem lintegral_add_left' {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk, ← lintegral_add_left hf.measurable_mk,
lintegral_congr_ae (hf.ae_eq_mk.add (ae_eq_refl g))]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_left' MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_left'
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Lebesgue.lean | 569 | 571 | theorem lintegral_add_right' (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by |
simpa only [add_comm] using lintegral_add_left' hg f
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Rat
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Inv
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Pow
import Mathlib.Util.AtomM
set_option autoImplicit true
namespace Mathlib.Tactic
namespace Ring
open Mathlib.Meta Qq NormNum Lean.Meta AtomM
open Lean (MetaM Expr mkRawNatLit)
def instCommSemiringNat : CommSemiring ℕ := inferInstance
def sℕ : Q(CommSemiring ℕ) := q(instCommSemiringNat)
-- In this file, we would like to use multi-character auto-implicits.
set_option relaxedAutoImplicit true
mutual
inductive ExBase : ∀ {α : Q(Type u)}, Q(CommSemiring $α) → (e : Q($α)) → Type
| atom (id : ℕ) : ExBase sα e
| sum (_ : ExSum sα e) : ExBase sα e
inductive ExProd : ∀ {α : Q(Type u)}, Q(CommSemiring $α) → (e : Q($α)) → Type
| const (value : ℚ) (hyp : Option Expr := none) : ExProd sα e
| mul {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {x : Q($α)} {e : Q(ℕ)} {b : Q($α)} :
ExBase sα x → ExProd sℕ e → ExProd sα b → ExProd sα q($x ^ $e * $b)
inductive ExSum : ∀ {α : Q(Type u)}, Q(CommSemiring $α) → (e : Q($α)) → Type
| zero {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} : ExSum sα q(0 : $α)
| add {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExProd sα a → ExSum sα b → ExSum sα q($a + $b)
end
mutual -- partial only to speed up compilation
partial def ExBase.eq : ExBase sα a → ExBase sα b → Bool
| .atom i, .atom j => i == j
| .sum a, .sum b => a.eq b
| _, _ => false
@[inherit_doc ExBase.eq]
partial def ExProd.eq : ExProd sα a → ExProd sα b → Bool
| .const i _, .const j _ => i == j
| .mul a₁ a₂ a₃, .mul b₁ b₂ b₃ => a₁.eq b₁ && a₂.eq b₂ && a₃.eq b₃
| _, _ => false
@[inherit_doc ExBase.eq]
partial def ExSum.eq : ExSum sα a → ExSum sα b → Bool
| .zero, .zero => true
| .add a₁ a₂, .add b₁ b₂ => a₁.eq b₁ && a₂.eq b₂
| _, _ => false
end
mutual -- partial only to speed up compilation
partial def ExBase.cmp : ExBase sα a → ExBase sα b → Ordering
| .atom i, .atom j => compare i j
| .sum a, .sum b => a.cmp b
| .atom .., .sum .. => .lt
| .sum .., .atom .. => .gt
@[inherit_doc ExBase.cmp]
partial def ExProd.cmp : ExProd sα a → ExProd sα b → Ordering
| .const i _, .const j _ => compare i j
| .mul a₁ a₂ a₃, .mul b₁ b₂ b₃ => (a₁.cmp b₁).then (a₂.cmp b₂) |>.then (a₃.cmp b₃)
| .const _ _, .mul .. => .lt
| .mul .., .const _ _ => .gt
@[inherit_doc ExBase.cmp]
partial def ExSum.cmp : ExSum sα a → ExSum sα b → Ordering
| .zero, .zero => .eq
| .add a₁ a₂, .add b₁ b₂ => (a₁.cmp b₁).then (a₂.cmp b₂)
| .zero, .add .. => .lt
| .add .., .zero => .gt
end
instance : Inhabited (Σ e, (ExBase sα) e) := ⟨default, .atom 0⟩
instance : Inhabited (Σ e, (ExSum sα) e) := ⟨_, .zero⟩
instance : Inhabited (Σ e, (ExProd sα) e) := ⟨default, .const 0 none⟩
mutual
partial def ExBase.cast : ExBase sα a → Σ a, ExBase sβ a
| .atom i => ⟨a, .atom i⟩
| .sum a => let ⟨_, vb⟩ := a.cast; ⟨_, .sum vb⟩
partial def ExProd.cast : ExProd sα a → Σ a, ExProd sβ a
| .const i h => ⟨a, .const i h⟩
| .mul a₁ a₂ a₃ => ⟨_, .mul a₁.cast.2 a₂ a₃.cast.2⟩
partial def ExSum.cast : ExSum sα a → Σ a, ExSum sβ a
| .zero => ⟨_, .zero⟩
| .add a₁ a₂ => ⟨_, .add a₁.cast.2 a₂.cast.2⟩
end
structure Result {α : Q(Type u)} (E : Q($α) → Type) (e : Q($α)) where
expr : Q($α)
val : E expr
proof : Q($e = $expr)
instance [Inhabited (Σ e, E e)] : Inhabited (Result E e) :=
let ⟨e', v⟩ : Σ e, E e := default; ⟨e', v, default⟩
variable {α : Q(Type u)} (sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)) [CommSemiring R]
def ExProd.mkNat (n : ℕ) : (e : Q($α)) × ExProd sα e :=
let lit : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit n
⟨q(($lit).rawCast : $α), .const n none⟩
def ExProd.mkNegNat (_ : Q(Ring $α)) (n : ℕ) : (e : Q($α)) × ExProd sα e :=
let lit : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit n
⟨q((Int.negOfNat $lit).rawCast : $α), .const (-n) none⟩
def ExProd.mkRat (_ : Q(DivisionRing $α)) (q : ℚ) (n : Q(ℤ)) (d : Q(ℕ)) (h : Expr) :
(e : Q($α)) × ExProd sα e :=
⟨q(Rat.rawCast $n $d : $α), .const q h⟩
section
variable {sα}
def ExBase.toProd (va : ExBase sα a) (vb : ExProd sℕ b) :
ExProd sα q($a ^ $b * (nat_lit 1).rawCast) := .mul va vb (.const 1 none)
def ExProd.toSum (v : ExProd sα e) : ExSum sα q($e + 0) := .add v .zero
def ExProd.coeff : ExProd sα e → ℚ
| .const q _ => q
| .mul _ _ v => v.coeff
end
inductive Overlap (e : Q($α)) where
| zero (_ : Q(IsNat $e (nat_lit 0)))
| nonzero (_ : Result (ExProd sα) e)
theorem add_overlap_pf (x : R) (e) (pq_pf : a + b = c) :
x ^ e * a + x ^ e * b = x ^ e * c := by subst_vars; simp [mul_add]
theorem add_overlap_pf_zero (x : R) (e) :
IsNat (a + b) (nat_lit 0) → IsNat (x ^ e * a + x ^ e * b) (nat_lit 0)
| ⟨h⟩ => ⟨by simp [h, ← mul_add]⟩
def evalAddOverlap (va : ExProd sα a) (vb : ExProd sα b) : Option (Overlap sα q($a + $b)) :=
match va, vb with
| .const za ha, .const zb hb => do
let ra := Result.ofRawRat za a ha; let rb := Result.ofRawRat zb b hb
let res ← NormNum.evalAdd.core q($a + $b) q(HAdd.hAdd) a b ra rb
match res with
| .isNat _ (.lit (.natVal 0)) p => pure <| .zero p
| rc =>
let ⟨zc, hc⟩ ← rc.toRatNZ
let ⟨c, pc⟩ := rc.toRawEq
pure <| .nonzero ⟨c, .const zc hc, pc⟩
| .mul (x := a₁) (e := a₂) va₁ va₂ va₃, .mul vb₁ vb₂ vb₃ => do
guard (va₁.eq vb₁ && va₂.eq vb₂)
match ← evalAddOverlap va₃ vb₃ with
| .zero p => pure <| .zero (q(add_overlap_pf_zero $a₁ $a₂ $p) : Expr)
| .nonzero ⟨_, vc, p⟩ =>
pure <| .nonzero ⟨_, .mul va₁ va₂ vc, (q(add_overlap_pf $a₁ $a₂ $p) : Expr)⟩
| _, _ => none
theorem add_pf_zero_add (b : R) : 0 + b = b := by simp
theorem add_pf_add_zero (a : R) : a + 0 = a := by simp
| Mathlib/Tactic/Ring/Basic.lean | 316 | 318 | theorem add_pf_add_overlap
(_ : a₁ + b₁ = c₁) (_ : a₂ + b₂ = c₂) : (a₁ + a₂ : R) + (b₁ + b₂) = c₁ + c₂ := by |
subst_vars; simp [add_assoc, add_left_comm]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite
import Mathlib.Order.Partition.Finpartition
#align_import data.setoid.partition from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b363547b3113d350d053abdf2884e9850a56b205"
namespace Setoid
variable {α : Type*}
theorem eq_of_mem_eqv_class {c : Set (Set α)} (H : ∀ a, ∃! b ∈ c, a ∈ b) {x b b'}
(hc : b ∈ c) (hb : x ∈ b) (hc' : b' ∈ c) (hb' : x ∈ b') : b = b' :=
(H x).unique ⟨hc, hb⟩ ⟨hc', hb'⟩
#align setoid.eq_of_mem_eqv_class Setoid.eq_of_mem_eqv_class
def mkClasses (c : Set (Set α)) (H : ∀ a, ∃! b ∈ c, a ∈ b) : Setoid α where
r x y := ∀ s ∈ c, x ∈ s → y ∈ s
iseqv.refl := fun _ _ _ hx => hx
iseqv.symm := fun {x _y} h s hs hy => by
obtain ⟨t, ⟨ht, hx⟩, _⟩ := H x
rwa [eq_of_mem_eqv_class H hs hy ht (h t ht hx)]
iseqv.trans := fun {_x y z} h1 h2 s hs hx => h2 s hs (h1 s hs hx)
#align setoid.mk_classes Setoid.mkClasses
def classes (r : Setoid α) : Set (Set α) :=
{ s | ∃ y, s = { x | r.Rel x y } }
#align setoid.classes Setoid.classes
theorem mem_classes (r : Setoid α) (y) : { x | r.Rel x y } ∈ r.classes :=
⟨y, rfl⟩
#align setoid.mem_classes Setoid.mem_classes
theorem classes_ker_subset_fiber_set {β : Type*} (f : α → β) :
(Setoid.ker f).classes ⊆ Set.range fun y => { x | f x = y } := by
rintro s ⟨x, rfl⟩
rw [Set.mem_range]
exact ⟨f x, rfl⟩
#align setoid.classes_ker_subset_fiber_set Setoid.classes_ker_subset_fiber_set
theorem finite_classes_ker {α β : Type*} [Finite β] (f : α → β) : (Setoid.ker f).classes.Finite :=
(Set.finite_range _).subset <| classes_ker_subset_fiber_set f
#align setoid.finite_classes_ker Setoid.finite_classes_ker
theorem card_classes_ker_le {α β : Type*} [Fintype β] (f : α → β)
[Fintype (Setoid.ker f).classes] : Fintype.card (Setoid.ker f).classes ≤ Fintype.card β := by
classical exact
le_trans (Set.card_le_card (classes_ker_subset_fiber_set f)) (Fintype.card_range_le _)
#align setoid.card_classes_ker_le Setoid.card_classes_ker_le
theorem eq_iff_classes_eq {r₁ r₂ : Setoid α} :
r₁ = r₂ ↔ ∀ x, { y | r₁.Rel x y } = { y | r₂.Rel x y } :=
⟨fun h _x => h ▸ rfl, fun h => ext' fun x => Set.ext_iff.1 <| h x⟩
#align setoid.eq_iff_classes_eq Setoid.eq_iff_classes_eq
theorem rel_iff_exists_classes (r : Setoid α) {x y} : r.Rel x y ↔ ∃ c ∈ r.classes, x ∈ c ∧ y ∈ c :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, r.mem_classes y, h, r.refl' y⟩, fun ⟨c, ⟨z, hz⟩, hx, hy⟩ => by
subst c
exact r.trans' hx (r.symm' hy)⟩
#align setoid.rel_iff_exists_classes Setoid.rel_iff_exists_classes
theorem classes_inj {r₁ r₂ : Setoid α} : r₁ = r₂ ↔ r₁.classes = r₂.classes :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ rfl, fun h => ext' fun a b => by simp only [rel_iff_exists_classes, exists_prop, h]⟩
#align setoid.classes_inj Setoid.classes_inj
theorem empty_not_mem_classes {r : Setoid α} : ∅ ∉ r.classes := fun ⟨y, hy⟩ =>
Set.not_mem_empty y <| hy.symm ▸ r.refl' y
#align setoid.empty_not_mem_classes Setoid.empty_not_mem_classes
theorem classes_eqv_classes {r : Setoid α} (a) : ∃! b ∈ r.classes, a ∈ b :=
ExistsUnique.intro { x | r.Rel x a } ⟨r.mem_classes a, r.refl' _⟩ <| by
rintro y ⟨⟨_, rfl⟩, ha⟩
ext x
exact ⟨fun hx => r.trans' hx (r.symm' ha), fun hx => r.trans' hx ha⟩
#align setoid.classes_eqv_classes Setoid.classes_eqv_classes
theorem eq_of_mem_classes {r : Setoid α} {x b} (hc : b ∈ r.classes) (hb : x ∈ b) {b'}
(hc' : b' ∈ r.classes) (hb' : x ∈ b') : b = b' :=
eq_of_mem_eqv_class classes_eqv_classes hc hb hc' hb'
#align setoid.eq_of_mem_classes Setoid.eq_of_mem_classes
theorem eq_eqv_class_of_mem {c : Set (Set α)} (H : ∀ a, ∃! b ∈ c, a ∈ b) {s y}
(hs : s ∈ c) (hy : y ∈ s) : s = { x | (mkClasses c H).Rel x y } := by
ext x
constructor
· intro hx _s' hs' hx'
rwa [eq_of_mem_eqv_class H hs' hx' hs hx]
· intro hx
obtain ⟨b', ⟨hc, hb'⟩, _⟩ := H x
rwa [eq_of_mem_eqv_class H hs hy hc (hx b' hc hb')]
#align setoid.eq_eqv_class_of_mem Setoid.eq_eqv_class_of_mem
theorem eqv_class_mem {c : Set (Set α)} (H : ∀ a, ∃! b ∈ c, a ∈ b) {y} :
{ x | (mkClasses c H).Rel x y } ∈ c :=
(H y).elim fun _ hc _ => eq_eqv_class_of_mem H hc.1 hc.2 ▸ hc.1
#align setoid.eqv_class_mem Setoid.eqv_class_mem
| Mathlib/Data/Setoid/Partition.lean | 140 | 143 | theorem eqv_class_mem' {c : Set (Set α)} (H : ∀ a, ∃! b ∈ c, a ∈ b) {x} :
{ y : α | (mkClasses c H).Rel x y } ∈ c := by |
convert @Setoid.eqv_class_mem _ _ H x using 3
rw [Setoid.comm']
|
import Mathlib.Data.Stream.Init
import Mathlib.Tactic.ApplyFun
import Mathlib.Control.Fix
import Mathlib.Order.OmegaCompletePartialOrder
#align_import control.lawful_fix from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"92ca63f0fb391a9ca5f22d2409a6080e786d99f7"
universe u v
open scoped Classical
variable {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*}
open OmegaCompletePartialOrder
class LawfulFix (α : Type*) [OmegaCompletePartialOrder α] extends Fix α where
fix_eq : ∀ {f : α →o α}, Continuous f → Fix.fix f = f (Fix.fix f)
#align lawful_fix LawfulFix
theorem LawfulFix.fix_eq' {α} [OmegaCompletePartialOrder α] [LawfulFix α] {f : α → α}
(hf : Continuous' f) : Fix.fix f = f (Fix.fix f) :=
LawfulFix.fix_eq (hf.to_bundled _)
#align lawful_fix.fix_eq' LawfulFix.fix_eq'
namespace Part
open Part Nat Nat.Upto
namespace Fix
variable (f : ((a : _) → Part <| β a) →o (a : _) → Part <| β a)
theorem approx_mono' {i : ℕ} : Fix.approx f i ≤ Fix.approx f (succ i) := by
induction i with
| zero => dsimp [approx]; apply @bot_le _ _ _ (f ⊥)
| succ _ i_ih => intro; apply f.monotone; apply i_ih
#align part.fix.approx_mono' Part.Fix.approx_mono'
theorem approx_mono ⦃i j : ℕ⦄ (hij : i ≤ j) : approx f i ≤ approx f j := by
induction' j with j ih
· cases hij
exact le_rfl
cases hij; · exact le_rfl
exact le_trans (ih ‹_›) (approx_mono' f)
#align part.fix.approx_mono Part.Fix.approx_mono
theorem mem_iff (a : α) (b : β a) : b ∈ Part.fix f a ↔ ∃ i, b ∈ approx f i a := by
by_cases h₀ : ∃ i : ℕ, (approx f i a).Dom
· simp only [Part.fix_def f h₀]
constructor <;> intro hh
· exact ⟨_, hh⟩
have h₁ := Nat.find_spec h₀
rw [dom_iff_mem] at h₁
cases' h₁ with y h₁
replace h₁ := approx_mono' f _ _ h₁
suffices y = b by
subst this
exact h₁
cases' hh with i hh
revert h₁; generalize succ (Nat.find h₀) = j; intro h₁
wlog case : i ≤ j
· rcases le_total i j with H | H <;> [skip; symm] <;> apply_assumption <;> assumption
replace hh := approx_mono f case _ _ hh
apply Part.mem_unique h₁ hh
· simp only [fix_def' (⇑f) h₀, not_exists, false_iff_iff, not_mem_none]
simp only [dom_iff_mem, not_exists] at h₀
intro; apply h₀
#align part.fix.mem_iff Part.Fix.mem_iff
theorem approx_le_fix (i : ℕ) : approx f i ≤ Part.fix f := fun a b hh ↦ by
rw [mem_iff f]
exact ⟨_, hh⟩
#align part.fix.approx_le_fix Part.Fix.approx_le_fix
theorem exists_fix_le_approx (x : α) : ∃ i, Part.fix f x ≤ approx f i x := by
by_cases hh : ∃ i b, b ∈ approx f i x
· rcases hh with ⟨i, b, hb⟩
exists i
intro b' h'
have hb' := approx_le_fix f i _ _ hb
obtain rfl := Part.mem_unique h' hb'
exact hb
· simp only [not_exists] at hh
exists 0
intro b' h'
simp only [mem_iff f] at h'
cases' h' with i h'
cases hh _ _ h'
#align part.fix.exists_fix_le_approx Part.Fix.exists_fix_le_approx
def approxChain : Chain ((a : _) → Part <| β a) :=
⟨approx f, approx_mono f⟩
#align part.fix.approx_chain Part.Fix.approxChain
| Mathlib/Control/LawfulFix.lean | 120 | 123 | theorem le_f_of_mem_approx {x} : x ∈ approxChain f → x ≤ f x := by |
simp only [(· ∈ ·), forall_exists_index]
rintro i rfl
apply approx_mono'
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Linear
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Comp
#align_import analysis.calculus.fderiv.add from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e3fb84046afd187b710170887195d50bada934ee"
open Filter Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap Set Metric
open scoped Classical
open Topology NNReal Filter Asymptotics ENNReal
noncomputable section
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
variable {G' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G']
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : E → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : E →L[𝕜] F}
variable (e : E →L[𝕜] F)
variable {x : E}
variable {s t : Set E}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter E}
section Neg
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.neg (h : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => -f x) (-f') x :=
(-1 : F →L[𝕜] F).hasStrictFDerivAt.comp x h
#align has_strict_fderiv_at.neg HasStrictFDerivAt.neg
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.neg (h : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (fun x => -f x) (-f') x L :=
(-1 : F →L[𝕜] F).hasFDerivAtFilter.comp x h tendsto_map
#align has_fderiv_at_filter.neg HasFDerivAtFilter.neg
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.neg (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => -f x) (-f') s x :=
h.neg
#align has_fderiv_within_at.neg HasFDerivWithinAt.neg
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivAt.neg (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) : HasFDerivAt (fun x => -f x) (-f') x :=
h.neg
#align has_fderiv_at.neg HasFDerivAt.neg
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.neg (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => -f y) s x :=
h.hasFDerivWithinAt.neg.differentiableWithinAt
#align differentiable_within_at.neg DifferentiableWithinAt.neg
@[simp]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_neg_iff :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => -f y) s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [neg_neg] using h.neg, fun h => h.neg⟩
#align differentiable_within_at_neg_iff differentiableWithinAt_neg_iff
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.neg (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => -f y) x :=
h.hasFDerivAt.neg.differentiableAt
#align differentiable_at.neg DifferentiableAt.neg
@[simp]
theorem differentiableAt_neg_iff : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => -f y) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [neg_neg] using h.neg, fun h => h.neg⟩
#align differentiable_at_neg_iff differentiableAt_neg_iff
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.neg (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => -f y) s :=
fun x hx => (h x hx).neg
#align differentiable_on.neg DifferentiableOn.neg
@[simp]
theorem differentiableOn_neg_iff : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => -f y) s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [neg_neg] using h.neg, fun h => h.neg⟩
#align differentiable_on_neg_iff differentiableOn_neg_iff
@[fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.neg (h : Differentiable 𝕜 f) : Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => -f y := fun x =>
(h x).neg
#align differentiable.neg Differentiable.neg
@[simp]
theorem differentiable_neg_iff : (Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => -f y) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [neg_neg] using h.neg, fun h => h.neg⟩
#align differentiable_neg_iff differentiable_neg_iff
theorem fderivWithin_neg (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => -f y) s x = -fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x :=
if h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x then h.hasFDerivWithinAt.neg.fderivWithin hxs
else by
rw [fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt h,
fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt, neg_zero]
simpa
#align fderiv_within_neg fderivWithin_neg
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Add.lean | 488 | 489 | theorem fderiv_neg : fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => -f y) x = -fderiv 𝕜 f x := by |
simp only [← fderivWithin_univ, fderivWithin_neg uniqueDiffWithinAt_univ]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Definitions
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Basic
#align_import data.polynomial.degree.trailing_degree from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"302eab4f46abb63de520828de78c04cb0f9b5836"
noncomputable section
open Function Polynomial Finsupp Finset
open scoped Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b : R} {n m : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
def trailingDegree (p : R[X]) : ℕ∞ :=
p.support.min
#align polynomial.trailing_degree Polynomial.trailingDegree
theorem trailingDegree_lt_wf : WellFounded fun p q : R[X] => trailingDegree p < trailingDegree q :=
InvImage.wf trailingDegree wellFounded_lt
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_lt_wf Polynomial.trailingDegree_lt_wf
def natTrailingDegree (p : R[X]) : ℕ :=
(trailingDegree p).getD 0
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree Polynomial.natTrailingDegree
def trailingCoeff (p : R[X]) : R :=
coeff p (natTrailingDegree p)
#align polynomial.trailing_coeff Polynomial.trailingCoeff
def TrailingMonic (p : R[X]) :=
trailingCoeff p = (1 : R)
#align polynomial.trailing_monic Polynomial.TrailingMonic
theorem TrailingMonic.def : TrailingMonic p ↔ trailingCoeff p = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align polynomial.trailing_monic.def Polynomial.TrailingMonic.def
instance TrailingMonic.decidable [DecidableEq R] : Decidable (TrailingMonic p) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Decidable (trailingCoeff p = (1 : R))
#align polynomial.trailing_monic.decidable Polynomial.TrailingMonic.decidable
@[simp]
theorem TrailingMonic.trailingCoeff {p : R[X]} (hp : p.TrailingMonic) : trailingCoeff p = 1 :=
hp
#align polynomial.trailing_monic.trailing_coeff Polynomial.TrailingMonic.trailingCoeff
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_zero : trailingDegree (0 : R[X]) = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_zero Polynomial.trailingDegree_zero
@[simp]
theorem trailingCoeff_zero : trailingCoeff (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.trailing_coeff_zero Polynomial.trailingCoeff_zero
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_zero : natTrailingDegree (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_zero Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_zero
theorem trailingDegree_eq_top : trailingDegree p = ⊤ ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h => support_eq_empty.1 (Finset.min_eq_top.1 h), fun h => by simp [h]⟩
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_eq_top Polynomial.trailingDegree_eq_top
theorem trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree (hp : p ≠ 0) :
trailingDegree p = (natTrailingDegree p : ℕ∞) := by
let ⟨n, hn⟩ :=
not_forall.1 (mt Option.eq_none_iff_forall_not_mem.2 (mt trailingDegree_eq_top.1 hp))
have hn : trailingDegree p = n := Classical.not_not.1 hn
rw [natTrailingDegree, hn]
rfl
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_eq_nat_trailing_degree Polynomial.trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree
theorem trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
p.trailingDegree = n ↔ p.natTrailingDegree = n := by
rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp]
exact WithTop.coe_eq_coe
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_eq_iff_nat_trailing_degree_eq Polynomial.trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq
theorem trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq_of_pos {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
p.trailingDegree = n ↔ p.natTrailingDegree = n := by
constructor
· intro H
rwa [← trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq]
rintro rfl
rw [trailingDegree_zero] at H
exact Option.noConfusion H
· intro H
rwa [trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq]
rintro rfl
rw [natTrailingDegree_zero] at H
rw [H] at hn
exact lt_irrefl _ hn
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_eq_iff_nat_trailing_degree_eq_of_pos Polynomial.trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq_of_pos
theorem natTrailingDegree_eq_of_trailingDegree_eq_some {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ}
(h : trailingDegree p = n) : natTrailingDegree p = n :=
have hp0 : p ≠ 0 := fun hp0 => by rw [hp0] at h; exact Option.noConfusion h
Option.some_inj.1 <|
show (natTrailingDegree p : ℕ∞) = n by rwa [← trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp0]
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_eq_of_trailing_degree_eq_some Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_eq_of_trailingDegree_eq_some
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_trailingDegree : ↑(natTrailingDegree p) ≤ trailingDegree p := by
by_cases hp : p = 0;
· rw [hp, trailingDegree_zero]
exact le_top
rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp]
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_le_trailing_degree Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_le_trailingDegree
theorem natTrailingDegree_eq_of_trailingDegree_eq [Semiring S] {q : S[X]}
(h : trailingDegree p = trailingDegree q) : natTrailingDegree p = natTrailingDegree q := by
unfold natTrailingDegree
rw [h]
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_eq_of_trailing_degree_eq Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_eq_of_trailingDegree_eq
theorem trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : trailingDegree p ≤ n :=
show @LE.le ℕ∞ _ p.support.min n from min_le (mem_support_iff.2 h)
#align polynomial.le_trailing_degree_of_ne_zero Polynomial.trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : natTrailingDegree p ≤ n := by
have : WithTop.some (natTrailingDegree p) = Nat.cast (natTrailingDegree p) := rfl
rw [← WithTop.coe_le_coe, this, ← trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree]
· exact trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero h
· intro h
subst h
exact h rfl
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_le_of_ne_zero Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero
@[simp] lemma coeff_natTrailingDegree_eq_zero : coeff p p.natTrailingDegree = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by
constructor
· rintro h
by_contra hp
obtain ⟨n, hpn, hn⟩ := by simpa using min_mem_image_coe $ support_nonempty.2 hp
obtain rfl := (trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq hp).1 hn.symm
exact hpn h
· rintro rfl
simp
lemma coeff_natTrailingDegree_ne_zero : coeff p p.natTrailingDegree ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
coeff_natTrailingDegree_eq_zero.not
@[simp] lemma natTrailingDegree_eq_zero : natTrailingDegree p = 0 ↔ p = 0 ∨ coeff p 0 ≠ 0 := by
constructor
· rw [or_iff_not_imp_left]
rintro h hp
rwa [← h, coeff_natTrailingDegree_ne_zero]
· rintro (rfl | h)
· simp
· exact nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 $ natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero h
lemma trailingDegree_eq_zero : trailingDegree p = 0 ↔ coeff p 0 ≠ 0 := by
obtain rfl | hp := eq_or_ne p 0
· simp [WithTop.top_ne_zero (α := ℕ)]
· exact (trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq hp).trans $
natTrailingDegree_eq_zero.trans $ or_iff_right hp
lemma natTrailingDegree_ne_zero : natTrailingDegree p ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 ∧ coeff p 0 = 0 :=
natTrailingDegree_eq_zero.not.trans $ by rw [not_or, not_ne_iff]
lemma trailingDegree_ne_zero : trailingDegree p ≠ 0 ↔ coeff p 0 = 0 :=
trailingDegree_eq_zero.not_left
@[simp] theorem trailingDegree_le_trailingDegree (h : coeff q (natTrailingDegree p) ≠ 0) :
trailingDegree q ≤ trailingDegree p := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp]
exact le_top
· rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp]
exact trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero h
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_le_trailing_degree Polynomial.trailingDegree_le_trailingDegree
theorem trailingDegree_ne_of_natTrailingDegree_ne {n : ℕ} :
p.natTrailingDegree ≠ n → trailingDegree p ≠ n := by
-- Porting note: Needed to account for different coercion behaviour & add the lemma below
have : Nat.cast n = WithTop.some n := rfl
exact mt fun h => by rw [natTrailingDegree, h, this, ← WithTop.some_eq_coe, Option.getD_some]
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_ne_of_nat_trailing_degree_ne Polynomial.trailingDegree_ne_of_natTrailingDegree_ne
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_of_trailingDegree_le {n : ℕ} {hp : p ≠ 0}
(H : (n : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree p) : n ≤ natTrailingDegree p := by
rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp] at H
exact WithTop.coe_le_coe.mp H
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_le_of_trailing_degree_le Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_le_of_trailingDegree_le
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_natTrailingDegree {hq : q ≠ 0}
(hpq : p.trailingDegree ≤ q.trailingDegree) : p.natTrailingDegree ≤ q.natTrailingDegree := by
by_cases hp : p = 0;
· rw [hp, natTrailingDegree_zero]
exact zero_le _
rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp, trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hq] at hpq
exact WithTop.coe_le_coe.1 hpq
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_le_nat_trailing_degree Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_le_natTrailingDegree
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_monomial (ha : a ≠ 0) : trailingDegree (monomial n a) = n := by
rw [trailingDegree, support_monomial n ha, min_singleton]
rfl
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_monomial Polynomial.trailingDegree_monomial
theorem natTrailingDegree_monomial (ha : a ≠ 0) : natTrailingDegree (monomial n a) = n := by
rw [natTrailingDegree, trailingDegree_monomial ha]
rfl
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_monomial Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_monomial
theorem natTrailingDegree_monomial_le : natTrailingDegree (monomial n a) ≤ n :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if ha : a = 0 then by simp [ha] else (natTrailingDegree_monomial ha).le
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_monomial_le Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_monomial_le
theorem le_trailingDegree_monomial : ↑n ≤ trailingDegree (monomial n a) :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if ha : a = 0 then by simp [ha] else (trailingDegree_monomial ha).ge
#align polynomial.le_trailing_degree_monomial Polynomial.le_trailingDegree_monomial
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_C (ha : a ≠ 0) : trailingDegree (C a) = (0 : ℕ∞) :=
trailingDegree_monomial ha
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_C Polynomial.trailingDegree_C
theorem le_trailingDegree_C : (0 : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (C a) :=
le_trailingDegree_monomial
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.le_trailing_degree_C Polynomial.le_trailingDegree_C
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Degree/TrailingDegree.lean | 264 | 266 | theorem trailingDegree_one_le : (0 : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (1 : R[X]) := by |
rw [← C_1]
exact le_trailingDegree_C
|
import Mathlib.Probability.IdentDistrib
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.DominatedConvergence
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.FloorPow
import Mathlib.Analysis.PSeries
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.SpecificAsymptotics
#align_import probability.strong_law from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
noncomputable section
open MeasureTheory Filter Finset Asymptotics
open Set (indicator)
open scoped Topology MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory ENNReal NNReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory
section Truncation
variable {α : Type*}
def truncation (f : α → ℝ) (A : ℝ) :=
indicator (Set.Ioc (-A) A) id ∘ f
#align probability_theory.truncation ProbabilityTheory.truncation
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f : α → ℝ}
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.truncation (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
{A : ℝ} : AEStronglyMeasurable (truncation f A) μ := by
apply AEStronglyMeasurable.comp_aemeasurable _ hf.aemeasurable
exact (stronglyMeasurable_id.indicator measurableSet_Ioc).aestronglyMeasurable
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable.truncation MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.truncation
| Mathlib/Probability/StrongLaw.lean | 88 | 92 | theorem abs_truncation_le_bound (f : α → ℝ) (A : ℝ) (x : α) : |truncation f A x| ≤ |A| := by |
simp only [truncation, Set.indicator, Set.mem_Icc, id, Function.comp_apply]
split_ifs with h
· exact abs_le_abs h.2 (neg_le.2 h.1.le)
· simp [abs_nonneg]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.TypeTags
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.LinearMap.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dual
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Contraction
import Mathlib.RingTheory.TensorProduct.Basic
#align_import representation_theory.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c04bc6e93e23aa0182aba53661a2211e80b6feac"
open MonoidAlgebra (lift of)
open LinearMap
section
variable (k G V : Type*) [CommSemiring k] [Monoid G] [AddCommMonoid V] [Module k V]
abbrev Representation :=
G →* V →ₗ[k] V
#align representation Representation
end
namespace Representation
section MonoidAlgebra
variable {k G V : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Monoid G] [AddCommMonoid V] [Module k V]
variable (ρ : Representation k G V)
noncomputable def asAlgebraHom : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] Module.End k V :=
(lift k G _) ρ
#align representation.as_algebra_hom Representation.asAlgebraHom
theorem asAlgebraHom_def : asAlgebraHom ρ = (lift k G _) ρ :=
rfl
#align representation.as_algebra_hom_def Representation.asAlgebraHom_def
@[simp]
theorem asAlgebraHom_single (g : G) (r : k) : asAlgebraHom ρ (Finsupp.single g r) = r • ρ g := by
simp only [asAlgebraHom_def, MonoidAlgebra.lift_single]
#align representation.as_algebra_hom_single Representation.asAlgebraHom_single
theorem asAlgebraHom_single_one (g : G) : asAlgebraHom ρ (Finsupp.single g 1) = ρ g := by simp
#align representation.as_algebra_hom_single_one Representation.asAlgebraHom_single_one
theorem asAlgebraHom_of (g : G) : asAlgebraHom ρ (of k G g) = ρ g := by
simp only [MonoidAlgebra.of_apply, asAlgebraHom_single, one_smul]
#align representation.as_algebra_hom_of Representation.asAlgebraHom_of
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def asModule (_ : Representation k G V) :=
V
#align representation.as_module Representation.asModule
-- Porting note: no derive handler
instance : AddCommMonoid (ρ.asModule) := inferInstanceAs <| AddCommMonoid V
instance : Inhabited ρ.asModule where
default := 0
noncomputable instance asModuleModule : Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) ρ.asModule :=
Module.compHom V (asAlgebraHom ρ).toRingHom
#align representation.as_module_module Representation.asModuleModule
-- Porting note: ρ.asModule doesn't unfold now
instance : Module k ρ.asModule := inferInstanceAs <| Module k V
def asModuleEquiv : ρ.asModule ≃+ V :=
AddEquiv.refl _
#align representation.as_module_equiv Representation.asModuleEquiv
@[simp]
theorem asModuleEquiv_map_smul (r : MonoidAlgebra k G) (x : ρ.asModule) :
ρ.asModuleEquiv (r • x) = ρ.asAlgebraHom r (ρ.asModuleEquiv x) :=
rfl
#align representation.as_module_equiv_map_smul Representation.asModuleEquiv_map_smul
@[simp]
theorem asModuleEquiv_symm_map_smul (r : k) (x : V) :
ρ.asModuleEquiv.symm (r • x) = algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra k G) r • ρ.asModuleEquiv.symm x := by
apply_fun ρ.asModuleEquiv
simp
#align representation.as_module_equiv_symm_map_smul Representation.asModuleEquiv_symm_map_smul
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RepresentationTheory/Basic.lean | 166 | 169 | theorem asModuleEquiv_symm_map_rho (g : G) (x : V) :
ρ.asModuleEquiv.symm (ρ g x) = MonoidAlgebra.of k G g • ρ.asModuleEquiv.symm x := by |
apply_fun ρ.asModuleEquiv
simp
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineMap
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineSubspace
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
#align_import linear_algebra.affine_space.combination from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2de9c37fa71dde2f1c6feff19876dd6a7b1519f0"
noncomputable section
open Affine
namespace Finset
theorem univ_fin2 : (univ : Finset (Fin 2)) = {0, 1} := by
ext x
fin_cases x <;> simp
#align finset.univ_fin2 Finset.univ_fin2
variable {k : Type*} {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
variable [S : AffineSpace V P]
variable {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι)
variable {ι₂ : Type*} (s₂ : Finset ι₂)
def weightedVSubOfPoint (p : ι → P) (b : P) : (ι → k) →ₗ[k] V :=
∑ i ∈ s, (LinearMap.proj i : (ι → k) →ₗ[k] k).smulRight (p i -ᵥ b)
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_apply (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p i -ᵥ b) := by
simp [weightedVSubOfPoint, LinearMap.sum_apply]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_apply Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply
@[simp (high)]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const (w : ι → k) (p : P) (b : P) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint (fun _ => p) b w = (∑ i ∈ s, w i) • (p -ᵥ b) := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, sum_smul]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_apply_const Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_congr {w₁ w₂ : ι → k} (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i) {p₁ p₂ : ι → P}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, p₁ i = p₂ i) (b : P) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₁ b w₁ = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₂ b w₂ := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
refine sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
rw [hw i hi, hp i hi]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_congr Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_congr
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_weights_eq (p : ι → P) (j : ι) (w₁ w₂ : ι → k)
(hw : ∀ i, i ≠ j → w₁ i = w₂ i) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p j) w₁ = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p j) w₂ := by
simp only [Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
congr
ext i
rcases eq_or_ne i j with h | h
· simp [h]
· simp [hw i h]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_eq_of_weights_eq Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_weights_eq
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_sum_eq_zero (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0)
(b₁ b₂ : P) : s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₁ w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₂ w := by
apply eq_of_sub_eq_zero
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← sum_sub_distrib]
conv_lhs =>
congr
· skip
· ext
rw [← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left]
rw [← sum_smul, h, zero_smul]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_eq_of_sum_eq_zero Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_sum_eq_zero
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_eq_of_sum_eq_one (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1)
(b₁ b₂ : P) : s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₁ w +ᵥ b₁ = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₂ w +ᵥ b₂ := by
erw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V,
vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, ← add_sub_assoc, add_comm, add_sub_assoc, ←
sum_sub_distrib]
conv_lhs =>
congr
· skip
· congr
· skip
· ext
rw [← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left]
rw [← sum_smul, h, one_smul, vsub_add_vsub_cancel, vsub_self]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_vadd_eq_of_sum_eq_one Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_eq_of_sum_eq_one
@[simp (high)]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_erase [DecidableEq ι] (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (i : ι) :
(s.erase i).weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
apply sum_erase
rw [vsub_self, smul_zero]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_erase Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_erase
@[simp (high)]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_insert [DecidableEq ι] (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (i : ι) :
(insert i s).weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
apply sum_insert_zero
rw [vsub_self, smul_zero]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_insert Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_insert
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_indicator_subset (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) {s₁ s₂ : Finset ι}
(h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
s₁.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint p b (Set.indicator (↑s₁) w) := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
exact Eq.symm <|
sum_indicator_subset_of_eq_zero w (fun i wi => wi • (p i -ᵥ b : V)) h fun i => zero_smul k _
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_indicator_subset Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_indicator_subset
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_map (e : ι₂ ↪ ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) :
(s₂.map e).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint (p ∘ e) b (w ∘ e) := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
exact Finset.sum_map _ _ _
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_map Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_map
theorem sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub (w : ι → k) (p₁ p₂ : ι → P) (b : P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂ i)) =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₁ b w - s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₂ b w := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← sum_sub_distrib, ← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
#align finset.sum_smul_vsub_eq_weighted_vsub_of_point_sub Finset.sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub
theorem sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub (w : ι → k) (p₁ : ι → P) (p₂ b : P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂)) = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₁ b w - (∑ i ∈ s, w i) • (p₂ -ᵥ b) := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const]
#align finset.sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_weighted_vsub_of_point_sub Finset.sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub
theorem sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_sub_weightedVSubOfPoint (w : ι → k) (p₂ : ι → P) (p₁ b : P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ i)) = (∑ i ∈ s, w i) • (p₁ -ᵥ b) - s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₂ b w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const]
#align finset.sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_sub_weighted_vsub_of_point Finset.sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_sub_weightedVSubOfPoint
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) (b : P) :
(s \ s₂).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w + s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, sum_sdiff h]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_sdiff Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff_sub [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) (b : P) :
(s \ s₂).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w - s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint p b (-w) =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
rw [map_neg, sub_neg_eq_add, s.weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff h]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_sdiff_sub Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff_sub
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/Combination.lean | 216 | 220 | theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype_eq_filter (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) (pred : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred pred] :
((s.subtype pred).weightedVSubOfPoint (fun i => p i) b fun i => w i) =
(s.filter pred).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by |
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← sum_subtype_eq_sum_filter]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.MeanValue
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.DominatedConvergence
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.SetIntegral
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.HahnBanach.SeparatingDual
#align_import analysis.calculus.parametric_integral from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8f9fea08977f7e450770933ee6abb20733b47c92"
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory Filter Metric
open scoped Topology Filter
variable {α : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup H] [NormedSpace 𝕜 H]
variable {F : H → α → E} {x₀ : H} {bound : α → ℝ} {ε : ℝ}
theorem hasFDerivAt_integral_of_dominated_loc_of_lip' {F' : α → H →L[𝕜] E} (ε_pos : 0 < ε)
(hF_meas : ∀ x ∈ ball x₀ ε, AEStronglyMeasurable (F x) μ) (hF_int : Integrable (F x₀) μ)
(hF'_meas : AEStronglyMeasurable F' μ)
(h_lipsch : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ x ∈ ball x₀ ε, ‖F x a - F x₀ a‖ ≤ bound a * ‖x - x₀‖)
(bound_integrable : Integrable (bound : α → ℝ) μ)
(h_diff : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, HasFDerivAt (F · a) (F' a) x₀) :
Integrable F' μ ∧ HasFDerivAt (fun x ↦ ∫ a, F x a ∂μ) (∫ a, F' a ∂μ) x₀ := by
have x₀_in : x₀ ∈ ball x₀ ε := mem_ball_self ε_pos
have nneg : ∀ x, 0 ≤ ‖x - x₀‖⁻¹ := fun x ↦ inv_nonneg.mpr (norm_nonneg _)
set b : α → ℝ := fun a ↦ |bound a|
have b_int : Integrable b μ := bound_integrable.norm
have b_nonneg : ∀ a, 0 ≤ b a := fun a ↦ abs_nonneg _
replace h_lipsch : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ x ∈ ball x₀ ε, ‖F x a - F x₀ a‖ ≤ b a * ‖x - x₀‖ :=
h_lipsch.mono fun a ha x hx ↦
(ha x hx).trans <| mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_abs_self _) (norm_nonneg _)
have hF_int' : ∀ x ∈ ball x₀ ε, Integrable (F x) μ := fun x x_in ↦ by
have : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖F x₀ a - F x a‖ ≤ ε * b a := by
simp only [norm_sub_rev (F x₀ _)]
refine h_lipsch.mono fun a ha ↦ (ha x x_in).trans ?_
rw [mul_comm ε]
rw [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm] at x_in
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left x_in.le (b_nonneg _)
exact integrable_of_norm_sub_le (hF_meas x x_in) hF_int
(bound_integrable.norm.const_mul ε) this
have hF'_int : Integrable F' μ :=
have : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖F' a‖ ≤ b a := by
apply (h_diff.and h_lipsch).mono
rintro a ⟨ha_diff, ha_lip⟩
exact ha_diff.le_of_lip' (b_nonneg a) (mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhds _ ε_pos) <| ha_lip)
b_int.mono' hF'_meas this
refine ⟨hF'_int, ?_⟩
by_cases hE : CompleteSpace E; swap
· rcases subsingleton_or_nontrivial H with hH|hH
· have : Subsingleton (H →L[𝕜] E) := inferInstance
convert hasFDerivAt_of_subsingleton _ x₀
· have : ¬(CompleteSpace (H →L[𝕜] E)) := by
simpa [SeparatingDual.completeSpace_continuousLinearMap_iff] using hE
simp only [integral, hE, ↓reduceDite, this]
exact hasFDerivAt_const 0 x₀
have h_ball : ball x₀ ε ∈ 𝓝 x₀ := ball_mem_nhds x₀ ε_pos
have : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ‖x - x₀‖⁻¹ * ‖((∫ a, F x a ∂μ) - ∫ a, F x₀ a ∂μ) - (∫ a, F' a ∂μ) (x - x₀)‖ =
‖∫ a, ‖x - x₀‖⁻¹ • (F x a - F x₀ a - F' a (x - x₀)) ∂μ‖ := by
apply mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhds _ ε_pos)
intro x x_in; simp only
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, ← norm_smul_of_nonneg (nneg _), integral_smul, integral_sub, integral_sub,
← ContinuousLinearMap.integral_apply hF'_int]
exacts [hF_int' x x_in, hF_int, (hF_int' x x_in).sub hF_int,
hF'_int.apply_continuousLinearMap _]
rw [hasFDerivAt_iff_tendsto, tendsto_congr' this, ← tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero, ←
show (∫ a : α, ‖x₀ - x₀‖⁻¹ • (F x₀ a - F x₀ a - (F' a) (x₀ - x₀)) ∂μ) = 0 by simp]
apply tendsto_integral_filter_of_dominated_convergence
· filter_upwards [h_ball] with _ x_in
apply AEStronglyMeasurable.const_smul
exact ((hF_meas _ x_in).sub (hF_meas _ x₀_in)).sub (hF'_meas.apply_continuousLinearMap _)
· refine mem_of_superset h_ball fun x hx ↦ ?_
apply (h_diff.and h_lipsch).mono
on_goal 1 => rintro a ⟨-, ha_bound⟩
show ‖‖x - x₀‖⁻¹ • (F x a - F x₀ a - F' a (x - x₀))‖ ≤ b a + ‖F' a‖
replace ha_bound : ‖F x a - F x₀ a‖ ≤ b a * ‖x - x₀‖ := ha_bound x hx
calc
‖‖x - x₀‖⁻¹ • (F x a - F x₀ a - F' a (x - x₀))‖ =
‖‖x - x₀‖⁻¹ • (F x a - F x₀ a) - ‖x - x₀‖⁻¹ • F' a (x - x₀)‖ := by rw [smul_sub]
_ ≤ ‖‖x - x₀‖⁻¹ • (F x a - F x₀ a)‖ + ‖‖x - x₀‖⁻¹ • F' a (x - x₀)‖ := norm_sub_le _ _
_ = ‖x - x₀‖⁻¹ * ‖F x a - F x₀ a‖ + ‖x - x₀‖⁻¹ * ‖F' a (x - x₀)‖ := by
rw [norm_smul_of_nonneg, norm_smul_of_nonneg] <;> exact nneg _
_ ≤ ‖x - x₀‖⁻¹ * (b a * ‖x - x₀‖) + ‖x - x₀‖⁻¹ * (‖F' a‖ * ‖x - x₀‖) := by
gcongr; exact (F' a).le_opNorm _
_ ≤ b a + ‖F' a‖ := ?_
simp only [← div_eq_inv_mul]
apply_rules [add_le_add, div_le_of_nonneg_of_le_mul] <;> first | rfl | positivity
· exact b_int.add hF'_int.norm
· apply h_diff.mono
intro a ha
suffices Tendsto (fun x ↦ ‖x - x₀‖⁻¹ • (F x a - F x₀ a - F' a (x - x₀))) (𝓝 x₀) (𝓝 0) by simpa
rw [tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero]
have : (fun x ↦ ‖x - x₀‖⁻¹ * ‖F x a - F x₀ a - F' a (x - x₀)‖) = fun x ↦
‖‖x - x₀‖⁻¹ • (F x a - F x₀ a - F' a (x - x₀))‖ := by
ext x
rw [norm_smul_of_nonneg (nneg _)]
rwa [hasFDerivAt_iff_tendsto, this] at ha
#align has_fderiv_at_integral_of_dominated_loc_of_lip' hasFDerivAt_integral_of_dominated_loc_of_lip'
theorem hasFDerivAt_integral_of_dominated_loc_of_lip {F' : α → H →L[𝕜] E}
(ε_pos : 0 < ε) (hF_meas : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, AEStronglyMeasurable (F x) μ)
(hF_int : Integrable (F x₀) μ) (hF'_meas : AEStronglyMeasurable F' μ)
(h_lip : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, LipschitzOnWith (Real.nnabs <| bound a) (F · a) (ball x₀ ε))
(bound_integrable : Integrable (bound : α → ℝ) μ)
(h_diff : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, HasFDerivAt (F · a) (F' a) x₀) :
Integrable F' μ ∧ HasFDerivAt (fun x ↦ ∫ a, F x a ∂μ) (∫ a, F' a ∂μ) x₀ := by
obtain ⟨δ, δ_pos, hδ⟩ : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ ball x₀ δ, AEStronglyMeasurable (F x) μ ∧ x ∈ ball x₀ ε :=
eventually_nhds_iff_ball.mp (hF_meas.and (ball_mem_nhds x₀ ε_pos))
choose hδ_meas hδε using hδ
replace h_lip : ∀ᵐ a : α ∂μ, ∀ x ∈ ball x₀ δ, ‖F x a - F x₀ a‖ ≤ |bound a| * ‖x - x₀‖ :=
h_lip.mono fun a lip x hx ↦ lip.norm_sub_le (hδε x hx) (mem_ball_self ε_pos)
replace bound_integrable := bound_integrable.norm
apply hasFDerivAt_integral_of_dominated_loc_of_lip' δ_pos <;> assumption
#align has_fderiv_at_integral_of_dominated_loc_of_lip hasFDerivAt_integral_of_dominated_loc_of_lip
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/ParametricIntegral.lean | 182 | 201 | theorem hasFDerivAt_integral_of_dominated_loc_of_lip_interval [NormedSpace ℝ H] {μ : Measure ℝ}
{F : H → ℝ → E} {F' : ℝ → H →L[ℝ] E} {a b : ℝ} {bound : ℝ → ℝ} (ε_pos : 0 < ε)
(hF_meas : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, AEStronglyMeasurable (F x) <| μ.restrict (Ι a b))
(hF_int : IntervalIntegrable (F x₀) μ a b)
(hF'_meas : AEStronglyMeasurable F' <| μ.restrict (Ι a b))
(h_lip : ∀ᵐ t ∂μ.restrict (Ι a b),
LipschitzOnWith (Real.nnabs <| bound t) (F · t) (ball x₀ ε))
(bound_integrable : IntervalIntegrable bound μ a b)
(h_diff : ∀ᵐ t ∂μ.restrict (Ι a b), HasFDerivAt (F · t) (F' t) x₀) :
IntervalIntegrable F' μ a b ∧
HasFDerivAt (fun x ↦ ∫ t in a..b, F x t ∂μ) (∫ t in a..b, F' t ∂μ) x₀ := by |
simp_rw [AEStronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable_uIoc_iff, eventually_and] at hF_meas hF'_meas
rw [ae_restrict_uIoc_iff] at h_lip h_diff
have H₁ :=
hasFDerivAt_integral_of_dominated_loc_of_lip ε_pos hF_meas.1 hF_int.1 hF'_meas.1 h_lip.1
bound_integrable.1 h_diff.1
have H₂ :=
hasFDerivAt_integral_of_dominated_loc_of_lip ε_pos hF_meas.2 hF_int.2 hF'_meas.2 h_lip.2
bound_integrable.2 h_diff.2
exact ⟨⟨H₁.1, H₂.1⟩, H₁.2.sub H₂.2⟩
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.List
import Mathlib.Data.Vector.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
import Mathlib.Data.List.OfFn
import Mathlib.Data.List.InsertNth
import Mathlib.Control.Applicative
import Mathlib.Control.Traversable.Basic
#align_import data.vector.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f694c7dead66f5d4c80f446c796a5aad14707f0e"
set_option autoImplicit true
universe u
variable {n : ℕ}
namespace Vector
variable {α : Type*}
@[inherit_doc]
infixr:67 " ::ᵥ " => Vector.cons
attribute [simp] head_cons tail_cons
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (Vector α n) :=
⟨ofFn default⟩
theorem toList_injective : Function.Injective (@toList α n) :=
Subtype.val_injective
#align vector.to_list_injective Vector.toList_injective
@[ext]
theorem ext : ∀ {v w : Vector α n} (_ : ∀ m : Fin n, Vector.get v m = Vector.get w m), v = w
| ⟨v, hv⟩, ⟨w, hw⟩, h =>
Subtype.eq (List.ext_get (by rw [hv, hw]) fun m hm _ => h ⟨m, hv ▸ hm⟩)
#align vector.ext Vector.ext
instance zero_subsingleton : Subsingleton (Vector α 0) :=
⟨fun _ _ => Vector.ext fun m => Fin.elim0 m⟩
#align vector.zero_subsingleton Vector.zero_subsingleton
@[simp]
theorem cons_val (a : α) : ∀ v : Vector α n, (a ::ᵥ v).val = a :: v.val
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
#align vector.cons_val Vector.cons_val
#align vector.cons_head Vector.head_cons
#align vector.cons_tail Vector.tail_cons
theorem eq_cons_iff (a : α) (v : Vector α n.succ) (v' : Vector α n) :
v = a ::ᵥ v' ↔ v.head = a ∧ v.tail = v' :=
⟨fun h => h.symm ▸ ⟨head_cons a v', tail_cons a v'⟩, fun h =>
_root_.trans (cons_head_tail v).symm (by rw [h.1, h.2])⟩
#align vector.eq_cons_iff Vector.eq_cons_iff
theorem ne_cons_iff (a : α) (v : Vector α n.succ) (v' : Vector α n) :
v ≠ a ::ᵥ v' ↔ v.head ≠ a ∨ v.tail ≠ v' := by rw [Ne, eq_cons_iff a v v', not_and_or]
#align vector.ne_cons_iff Vector.ne_cons_iff
theorem exists_eq_cons (v : Vector α n.succ) : ∃ (a : α) (as : Vector α n), v = a ::ᵥ as :=
⟨v.head, v.tail, (eq_cons_iff v.head v v.tail).2 ⟨rfl, rfl⟩⟩
#align vector.exists_eq_cons Vector.exists_eq_cons
@[simp]
theorem toList_ofFn : ∀ {n} (f : Fin n → α), toList (ofFn f) = List.ofFn f
| 0, f => by rw [ofFn, List.ofFn_zero, toList, nil]
| n + 1, f => by rw [ofFn, List.ofFn_succ, toList_cons, toList_ofFn]
#align vector.to_list_of_fn Vector.toList_ofFn
@[simp]
theorem mk_toList : ∀ (v : Vector α n) (h), (⟨toList v, h⟩ : Vector α n) = v
| ⟨_, _⟩, _ => rfl
#align vector.mk_to_list Vector.mk_toList
@[simp] theorem length_val (v : Vector α n) : v.val.length = n := v.2
-- Porting note: not used in mathlib and coercions done differently in Lean 4
-- @[simp]
-- theorem length_coe (v : Vector α n) :
-- ((coe : { l : List α // l.length = n } → List α) v).length = n :=
-- v.2
#noalign vector.length_coe
@[simp]
theorem toList_map {β : Type*} (v : Vector α n) (f : α → β) :
(v.map f).toList = v.toList.map f := by cases v; rfl
#align vector.to_list_map Vector.toList_map
@[simp]
theorem head_map {β : Type*} (v : Vector α (n + 1)) (f : α → β) : (v.map f).head = f v.head := by
obtain ⟨a, v', h⟩ := Vector.exists_eq_cons v
rw [h, map_cons, head_cons, head_cons]
#align vector.head_map Vector.head_map
@[simp]
theorem tail_map {β : Type*} (v : Vector α (n + 1)) (f : α → β) :
(v.map f).tail = v.tail.map f := by
obtain ⟨a, v', h⟩ := Vector.exists_eq_cons v
rw [h, map_cons, tail_cons, tail_cons]
#align vector.tail_map Vector.tail_map
theorem get_eq_get (v : Vector α n) (i : Fin n) :
v.get i = v.toList.get (Fin.cast v.toList_length.symm i) :=
rfl
#align vector.nth_eq_nth_le Vector.get_eq_getₓ
@[simp]
theorem get_replicate (a : α) (i : Fin n) : (Vector.replicate n a).get i = a := by
apply List.get_replicate
#align vector.nth_repeat Vector.get_replicate
@[simp]
theorem get_map {β : Type*} (v : Vector α n) (f : α → β) (i : Fin n) :
(v.map f).get i = f (v.get i) := by
cases v; simp [Vector.map, get_eq_get]; rfl
#align vector.nth_map Vector.get_map
@[simp]
theorem map₂_nil (f : α → β → γ) : Vector.map₂ f nil nil = nil :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map₂_cons (hd₁ : α) (tl₁ : Vector α n) (hd₂ : β) (tl₂ : Vector β n) (f : α → β → γ) :
Vector.map₂ f (hd₁ ::ᵥ tl₁) (hd₂ ::ᵥ tl₂) = f hd₁ hd₂ ::ᵥ (Vector.map₂ f tl₁ tl₂) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_ofFn {n} (f : Fin n → α) (i) : get (ofFn f) i = f i := by
conv_rhs => erw [← List.get_ofFn f ⟨i, by simp⟩]
simp only [get_eq_get]
congr <;> simp [Fin.heq_ext_iff]
#align vector.nth_of_fn Vector.get_ofFn
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Vector/Basic.lean | 151 | 155 | theorem ofFn_get (v : Vector α n) : ofFn (get v) = v := by |
rcases v with ⟨l, rfl⟩
apply toList_injective
dsimp
simpa only [toList_ofFn] using List.ofFn_get _
|
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.SMul
#align_import algebra.add_torsor from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9003f28797c0664a49e4179487267c494477d853"
class AddTorsor (G : outParam Type*) (P : Type*) [AddGroup G] extends AddAction G P,
VSub G P where
[nonempty : Nonempty P]
vsub_vadd' : ∀ p₁ p₂ : P, (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ : G) +ᵥ p₂ = p₁
vadd_vsub' : ∀ (g : G) (p : P), g +ᵥ p -ᵥ p = g
#align add_torsor AddTorsor
-- Porting note(#12096): removed `nolint instance_priority`; lint not ported yet
attribute [instance 100] AddTorsor.nonempty
-- Porting note(#12094): removed nolint; dangerous_instance linter not ported yet
--attribute [nolint dangerous_instance] AddTorsor.toVSub
-- Porting note(#12096): linter not ported yet
--@[nolint instance_priority]
instance addGroupIsAddTorsor (G : Type*) [AddGroup G] : AddTorsor G G where
vsub := Sub.sub
vsub_vadd' := sub_add_cancel
vadd_vsub' := add_sub_cancel_right
#align add_group_is_add_torsor addGroupIsAddTorsor
@[simp]
theorem vsub_eq_sub {G : Type*} [AddGroup G] (g₁ g₂ : G) : g₁ -ᵥ g₂ = g₁ - g₂ :=
rfl
#align vsub_eq_sub vsub_eq_sub
section General
variable {G : Type*} {P : Type*} [AddGroup G] [T : AddTorsor G P]
@[simp]
theorem vsub_vadd (p₁ p₂ : P) : p₁ -ᵥ p₂ +ᵥ p₂ = p₁ :=
AddTorsor.vsub_vadd' p₁ p₂
#align vsub_vadd vsub_vadd
@[simp]
theorem vadd_vsub (g : G) (p : P) : g +ᵥ p -ᵥ p = g :=
AddTorsor.vadd_vsub' g p
#align vadd_vsub vadd_vsub
theorem vadd_right_cancel {g₁ g₂ : G} (p : P) (h : g₁ +ᵥ p = g₂ +ᵥ p) : g₁ = g₂ := by
-- Porting note: vadd_vsub g₁ → vadd_vsub g₁ p
rw [← vadd_vsub g₁ p, h, vadd_vsub]
#align vadd_right_cancel vadd_right_cancel
@[simp]
theorem vadd_right_cancel_iff {g₁ g₂ : G} (p : P) : g₁ +ᵥ p = g₂ +ᵥ p ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨vadd_right_cancel p, fun h => h ▸ rfl⟩
#align vadd_right_cancel_iff vadd_right_cancel_iff
theorem vadd_right_injective (p : P) : Function.Injective ((· +ᵥ p) : G → P) := fun _ _ =>
vadd_right_cancel p
#align vadd_right_injective vadd_right_injective
theorem vadd_vsub_assoc (g : G) (p₁ p₂ : P) : g +ᵥ p₁ -ᵥ p₂ = g + (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) := by
apply vadd_right_cancel p₂
rw [vsub_vadd, add_vadd, vsub_vadd]
#align vadd_vsub_assoc vadd_vsub_assoc
@[simp]
theorem vsub_self (p : P) : p -ᵥ p = (0 : G) := by
rw [← zero_add (p -ᵥ p), ← vadd_vsub_assoc, vadd_vsub]
#align vsub_self vsub_self
theorem eq_of_vsub_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ : P} (h : p₁ -ᵥ p₂ = (0 : G)) : p₁ = p₂ := by
rw [← vsub_vadd p₁ p₂, h, zero_vadd]
#align eq_of_vsub_eq_zero eq_of_vsub_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq {p₁ p₂ : P} : p₁ -ᵥ p₂ = (0 : G) ↔ p₁ = p₂ :=
Iff.intro eq_of_vsub_eq_zero fun h => h ▸ vsub_self _
#align vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq
theorem vsub_ne_zero {p q : P} : p -ᵥ q ≠ (0 : G) ↔ p ≠ q :=
not_congr vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq
#align vsub_ne_zero vsub_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem vsub_add_vsub_cancel (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : p₁ -ᵥ p₂ + (p₂ -ᵥ p₃) = p₁ -ᵥ p₃ := by
apply vadd_right_cancel p₃
rw [add_vadd, vsub_vadd, vsub_vadd, vsub_vadd]
#align vsub_add_vsub_cancel vsub_add_vsub_cancel
@[simp]
theorem neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev (p₁ p₂ : P) : -(p₁ -ᵥ p₂) = p₂ -ᵥ p₁ := by
refine neg_eq_of_add_eq_zero_right (vadd_right_cancel p₁ ?_)
rw [vsub_add_vsub_cancel, vsub_self]
#align neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev
theorem vadd_vsub_eq_sub_vsub (g : G) (p q : P) : g +ᵥ p -ᵥ q = g - (q -ᵥ p) := by
rw [vadd_vsub_assoc, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
#align vadd_vsub_eq_sub_vsub vadd_vsub_eq_sub_vsub
theorem vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub (p₁ p₂ : P) (g : G) : p₁ -ᵥ (g +ᵥ p₂) = p₁ -ᵥ p₂ - g := by
rw [← add_right_inj (p₂ -ᵥ p₁ : G), vsub_add_vsub_cancel, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, vadd_vsub, ←
add_sub_assoc, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_add_self, zero_sub]
#align vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub
@[simp]
theorem vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : p₁ -ᵥ p₃ - (p₂ -ᵥ p₃) = p₁ -ᵥ p₂ := by
rw [← vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vsub_vadd]
#align vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right
theorem eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq (p₁ : P) (g : G) (p₂ : P) : p₁ = g +ᵥ p₂ ↔ p₁ -ᵥ p₂ = g :=
⟨fun h => h.symm ▸ vadd_vsub _ _, fun h => h ▸ (vsub_vadd _ _).symm⟩
#align eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq
theorem vadd_eq_vadd_iff_neg_add_eq_vsub {v₁ v₂ : G} {p₁ p₂ : P} :
v₁ +ᵥ p₁ = v₂ +ᵥ p₂ ↔ -v₁ + v₂ = p₁ -ᵥ p₂ := by
rw [eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq, vadd_vsub_assoc, ← add_right_inj (-v₁), neg_add_cancel_left, eq_comm]
#align vadd_eq_vadd_iff_neg_add_eq_vsub vadd_eq_vadd_iff_neg_add_eq_vsub
section comm
variable {G : Type*} {P : Type*} [AddCommGroup G] [AddTorsor G P]
@[simp]
theorem vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : p₃ -ᵥ p₂ - (p₃ -ᵥ p₁) = p₁ -ᵥ p₂ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, add_comm, vsub_add_vsub_cancel]
#align vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/AddTorsor.lean | 256 | 257 | theorem vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_left (v : G) (p₁ p₂ : P) : v +ᵥ p₁ -ᵥ (v +ᵥ p₂) = p₁ -ᵥ p₂ := by |
rw [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vadd_vsub_assoc, add_sub_cancel_left]
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.Free
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Torsion
#align_import linear_algebra.dimension from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"47a5f8186becdbc826190ced4312f8199f9db6a5"
noncomputable section
universe u v v' u₁' w w'
variable {R S : Type u} {M : Type v} {M' : Type v'} {M₁ : Type v}
variable {ι : Type w} {ι' : Type w'} {η : Type u₁'} {φ : η → Type*}
open Cardinal Basis Submodule Function Set FiniteDimensional DirectSum
variable [Ring R] [CommRing S] [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup M'] [AddCommGroup M₁]
variable [Module R M] [Module R M'] [Module R M₁]
section Finsupp
variable (R M M')
variable [StrongRankCondition R] [Module.Free R M] [Module.Free R M']
open Module.Free
@[simp]
theorem rank_finsupp (ι : Type w) :
Module.rank R (ι →₀ M) = Cardinal.lift.{v} #ι * Cardinal.lift.{w} (Module.rank R M) := by
obtain ⟨⟨_, bs⟩⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := R) (M := M)
rw [← bs.mk_eq_rank'', ← (Finsupp.basis fun _ : ι => bs).mk_eq_rank'', Cardinal.mk_sigma,
Cardinal.sum_const]
#align rank_finsupp rank_finsupp
theorem rank_finsupp' (ι : Type v) : Module.rank R (ι →₀ M) = #ι * Module.rank R M := by
simp [rank_finsupp]
#align rank_finsupp' rank_finsupp'
-- Porting note, this should not be `@[simp]`, as simp can prove it.
-- @[simp]
theorem rank_finsupp_self (ι : Type w) : Module.rank R (ι →₀ R) = Cardinal.lift.{u} #ι := by
simp [rank_finsupp]
#align rank_finsupp_self rank_finsupp_self
theorem rank_finsupp_self' {ι : Type u} : Module.rank R (ι →₀ R) = #ι := by simp
#align rank_finsupp_self' rank_finsupp_self'
@[simp]
theorem rank_directSum {ι : Type v} (M : ι → Type w) [∀ i : ι, AddCommGroup (M i)]
[∀ i : ι, Module R (M i)] [∀ i : ι, Module.Free R (M i)] :
Module.rank R (⨁ i, M i) = Cardinal.sum fun i => Module.rank R (M i) := by
let B i := chooseBasis R (M i)
let b : Basis _ R (⨁ i, M i) := DFinsupp.basis fun i => B i
simp [← b.mk_eq_rank'', fun i => (B i).mk_eq_rank'']
#align rank_direct_sum rank_directSum
@[simp]
theorem rank_matrix (m : Type v) (n : Type w) [Finite m] [Finite n] :
Module.rank R (Matrix m n R) =
Cardinal.lift.{max v w u, v} #m * Cardinal.lift.{max v w u, w} #n := by
cases nonempty_fintype m
cases nonempty_fintype n
have h := (Matrix.stdBasis R m n).mk_eq_rank
rw [← lift_lift.{max v w u, max v w}, lift_inj] at h
simpa using h.symm
#align rank_matrix rank_matrix
@[simp high]
theorem rank_matrix' (m n : Type v) [Finite m] [Finite n] :
Module.rank R (Matrix m n R) = Cardinal.lift.{u} (#m * #n) := by
rw [rank_matrix, lift_mul, lift_umax.{v, u}]
#align rank_matrix' rank_matrix'
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem rank_matrix'' (m n : Type u) [Finite m] [Finite n] :
Module.rank R (Matrix m n R) = #m * #n := by simp
#align rank_matrix'' rank_matrix''
variable [Module.Finite R M] [Module.Finite R M']
open Fintype
section SubalgebraRank
open Module
variable {F E : Type*} [CommRing F] [Ring E] [Algebra F E]
@[simp]
theorem Subalgebra.rank_toSubmodule (S : Subalgebra F E) :
Module.rank F (Subalgebra.toSubmodule S) = Module.rank F S :=
rfl
#align subalgebra.rank_to_submodule Subalgebra.rank_toSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem Subalgebra.finrank_toSubmodule (S : Subalgebra F E) :
finrank F (Subalgebra.toSubmodule S) = finrank F S :=
rfl
#align subalgebra.finrank_to_submodule Subalgebra.finrank_toSubmodule
theorem subalgebra_top_rank_eq_submodule_top_rank :
Module.rank F (⊤ : Subalgebra F E) = Module.rank F (⊤ : Submodule F E) := by
rw [← Algebra.top_toSubmodule]
rfl
#align subalgebra_top_rank_eq_submodule_top_rank subalgebra_top_rank_eq_submodule_top_rank
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Dimension/Constructions.lean | 544 | 547 | theorem subalgebra_top_finrank_eq_submodule_top_finrank :
finrank F (⊤ : Subalgebra F E) = finrank F (⊤ : Submodule F E) := by |
rw [← Algebra.top_toSubmodule]
rfl
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Free.Coherence
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Discrete
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.NaturalTransformation
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Opposite
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Coherence
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.CommSq
#align_import category_theory.monoidal.braided from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2efd2423f8d25fa57cf7a179f5d8652ab4d0df44"
open CategoryTheory MonoidalCategory
universe v v₁ v₂ v₃ u u₁ u₂ u₃
namespace CategoryTheory
class BraidedCategory (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory.{v} C] where
braiding : ∀ X Y : C, X ⊗ Y ≅ Y ⊗ X
braiding_naturality_right :
∀ (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z),
X ◁ f ≫ (braiding X Z).hom = (braiding X Y).hom ≫ f ▷ X := by
aesop_cat
braiding_naturality_left :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C),
f ▷ Z ≫ (braiding Y Z).hom = (braiding X Z).hom ≫ Z ◁ f := by
aesop_cat
hexagon_forward :
∀ X Y Z : C,
(α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ (braiding X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom ≫ (α_ Y Z X).hom =
((braiding X Y).hom ▷ Z) ≫ (α_ Y X Z).hom ≫ (Y ◁ (braiding X Z).hom) := by
aesop_cat
hexagon_reverse :
∀ X Y Z : C,
(α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (braiding (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom ≫ (α_ Z X Y).inv =
(X ◁ (braiding Y Z).hom) ≫ (α_ X Z Y).inv ≫ ((braiding X Z).hom ▷ Y) := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.braided_category CategoryTheory.BraidedCategory
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)]
BraidedCategory.braiding_naturality_left
BraidedCategory.braiding_naturality_right
attribute [reassoc] BraidedCategory.hexagon_forward BraidedCategory.hexagon_reverse
open Category
open MonoidalCategory
open BraidedCategory
@[inherit_doc]
notation "β_" => BraidedCategory.braiding
def braidedCategoryOfFaithful {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D] [MonoidalCategory C]
[MonoidalCategory D] (F : MonoidalFunctor C D) [F.Faithful] [BraidedCategory D]
(β : ∀ X Y : C, X ⊗ Y ≅ Y ⊗ X)
(w : ∀ X Y, F.μ _ _ ≫ F.map (β X Y).hom = (β_ _ _).hom ≫ F.μ _ _) : BraidedCategory C where
braiding := β
braiding_naturality_left := by
intros
apply F.map_injective
refine (cancel_epi (F.μ ?_ ?_)).1 ?_
rw [Functor.map_comp, ← LaxMonoidalFunctor.μ_natural_left_assoc, w, Functor.map_comp,
reassoc_of% w, braiding_naturality_left_assoc, LaxMonoidalFunctor.μ_natural_right]
braiding_naturality_right := by
intros
apply F.map_injective
refine (cancel_epi (F.μ ?_ ?_)).1 ?_
rw [Functor.map_comp, ← LaxMonoidalFunctor.μ_natural_right_assoc, w, Functor.map_comp,
reassoc_of% w, braiding_naturality_right_assoc, LaxMonoidalFunctor.μ_natural_left]
hexagon_forward := by
intros
apply F.map_injective
refine (cancel_epi (F.μ _ _)).1 ?_
refine (cancel_epi (F.μ _ _ ▷ _)).1 ?_
rw [Functor.map_comp, Functor.map_comp, Functor.map_comp, Functor.map_comp, ←
LaxMonoidalFunctor.μ_natural_left_assoc, ← comp_whiskerRight_assoc, w,
comp_whiskerRight_assoc, LaxMonoidalFunctor.associativity_assoc,
LaxMonoidalFunctor.associativity_assoc, ← LaxMonoidalFunctor.μ_natural_right, ←
MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp_assoc, w, MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp_assoc,
reassoc_of% w, braiding_naturality_right_assoc,
LaxMonoidalFunctor.associativity, hexagon_forward_assoc]
hexagon_reverse := by
intros
apply F.toFunctor.map_injective
refine (cancel_epi (F.μ _ _)).1 ?_
refine (cancel_epi (_ ◁ F.μ _ _)).1 ?_
rw [Functor.map_comp, Functor.map_comp, Functor.map_comp, Functor.map_comp, ←
LaxMonoidalFunctor.μ_natural_right_assoc, ← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp_assoc, w,
MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp_assoc, LaxMonoidalFunctor.associativity_inv_assoc,
LaxMonoidalFunctor.associativity_inv_assoc, ← LaxMonoidalFunctor.μ_natural_left,
← comp_whiskerRight_assoc, w, comp_whiskerRight_assoc, reassoc_of% w,
braiding_naturality_left_assoc, LaxMonoidalFunctor.associativity_inv, hexagon_reverse_assoc]
#align category_theory.braided_category_of_faithful CategoryTheory.braidedCategoryOfFaithful
noncomputable def braidedCategoryOfFullyFaithful {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D]
[MonoidalCategory C] [MonoidalCategory D] (F : MonoidalFunctor C D) [F.Full]
[F.Faithful] [BraidedCategory D] : BraidedCategory C :=
braidedCategoryOfFaithful F
(fun X Y => F.toFunctor.preimageIso
((asIso (F.μ _ _)).symm ≪≫ β_ (F.obj X) (F.obj Y) ≪≫ asIso (F.μ _ _)))
(by aesop_cat)
#align category_theory.braided_category_of_fully_faithful CategoryTheory.braidedCategoryOfFullyFaithful
section
variable (C : Type u₁) [Category.{v₁} C] [MonoidalCategory C] [BraidedCategory C]
theorem braiding_leftUnitor_aux₁ (X : C) :
(α_ (𝟙_ C) (𝟙_ C) X).hom ≫
(𝟙_ C ◁ (β_ X (𝟙_ C)).inv) ≫ (α_ _ X _).inv ≫ ((λ_ X).hom ▷ _) =
((λ_ _).hom ▷ X) ≫ (β_ X (𝟙_ C)).inv := by
coherence
#align category_theory.braiding_left_unitor_aux₁ CategoryTheory.braiding_leftUnitor_aux₁
theorem braiding_leftUnitor_aux₂ (X : C) :
((β_ X (𝟙_ C)).hom ▷ 𝟙_ C) ≫ ((λ_ X).hom ▷ 𝟙_ C) = (ρ_ X).hom ▷ 𝟙_ C :=
calc
((β_ X (𝟙_ C)).hom ▷ 𝟙_ C) ≫ ((λ_ X).hom ▷ 𝟙_ C) =
((β_ X (𝟙_ C)).hom ▷ 𝟙_ C) ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ ((λ_ X).hom ▷ 𝟙_ C) := by
coherence
_ = ((β_ X (𝟙_ C)).hom ▷ 𝟙_ C) ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (_ ◁ (β_ X _).hom) ≫
(_ ◁ (β_ X _).inv) ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ ((λ_ X).hom ▷ 𝟙_ C) := by
simp
_ = (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (β_ _ _).hom ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (_ ◁ (β_ X _).inv) ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫
((λ_ X).hom ▷ 𝟙_ C) := by
(slice_lhs 1 3 => rw [← hexagon_forward]); simp only [assoc]
_ = (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (β_ _ _).hom ≫ ((λ_ _).hom ▷ X) ≫ (β_ X _).inv := by
rw [braiding_leftUnitor_aux₁]
_ = (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (_ ◁ (λ_ _).hom) ≫ (β_ _ _).hom ≫ (β_ X _).inv := by
(slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [← braiding_naturality_right]); simp only [assoc]
_ = (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (_ ◁ (λ_ _).hom) := by rw [Iso.hom_inv_id, comp_id]
_ = (ρ_ X).hom ▷ 𝟙_ C := by rw [triangle]
#align category_theory.braiding_left_unitor_aux₂ CategoryTheory.braiding_leftUnitor_aux₂
@[reassoc]
theorem braiding_leftUnitor (X : C) : (β_ X (𝟙_ C)).hom ≫ (λ_ X).hom = (ρ_ X).hom := by
rw [← whiskerRight_iff, comp_whiskerRight, braiding_leftUnitor_aux₂]
#align category_theory.braiding_left_unitor CategoryTheory.braiding_leftUnitor
theorem braiding_rightUnitor_aux₁ (X : C) :
(α_ X (𝟙_ C) (𝟙_ C)).inv ≫
((β_ (𝟙_ C) X).inv ▷ 𝟙_ C) ≫ (α_ _ X _).hom ≫ (_ ◁ (ρ_ X).hom) =
(X ◁ (ρ_ _).hom) ≫ (β_ (𝟙_ C) X).inv := by
coherence
#align category_theory.braiding_right_unitor_aux₁ CategoryTheory.braiding_rightUnitor_aux₁
theorem braiding_rightUnitor_aux₂ (X : C) :
(𝟙_ C ◁ (β_ (𝟙_ C) X).hom) ≫ (𝟙_ C ◁ (ρ_ X).hom) = 𝟙_ C ◁ (λ_ X).hom :=
calc
(𝟙_ C ◁ (β_ (𝟙_ C) X).hom) ≫ (𝟙_ C ◁ (ρ_ X).hom) =
(𝟙_ C ◁ (β_ (𝟙_ C) X).hom) ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (𝟙_ C ◁ (ρ_ X).hom) := by
coherence
_ = (𝟙_ C ◁ (β_ (𝟙_ C) X).hom) ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ ((β_ _ X).hom ▷ _) ≫
((β_ _ X).inv ▷ _) ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (𝟙_ C ◁ (ρ_ X).hom) := by
simp
_ = (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ (β_ _ _).hom ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ ((β_ _ X).inv ▷ _) ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫
(𝟙_ C ◁ (ρ_ X).hom) := by
(slice_lhs 1 3 => rw [← hexagon_reverse]); simp only [assoc]
_ = (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ (β_ _ _).hom ≫ (X ◁ (ρ_ _).hom) ≫ (β_ _ X).inv := by
rw [braiding_rightUnitor_aux₁]
_ = (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ ((ρ_ _).hom ▷ _) ≫ (β_ _ X).hom ≫ (β_ _ _).inv := by
(slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [← braiding_naturality_left]); simp only [assoc]
_ = (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ ((ρ_ _).hom ▷ _) := by rw [Iso.hom_inv_id, comp_id]
_ = 𝟙_ C ◁ (λ_ X).hom := by rw [triangle_assoc_comp_right]
#align category_theory.braiding_right_unitor_aux₂ CategoryTheory.braiding_rightUnitor_aux₂
@[reassoc]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Braided/Basic.lean | 327 | 328 | theorem braiding_rightUnitor (X : C) : (β_ (𝟙_ C) X).hom ≫ (ρ_ X).hom = (λ_ X).hom := by |
rw [← whiskerLeft_iff, MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, braiding_rightUnitor_aux₂]
|
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.QuadraticReciprocity
#align_import number_theory.legendre_symbol.jacobi_symbol from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"74a27133cf29446a0983779e37c8f829a85368f3"
section Jacobi
open Nat ZMod
-- Since we need the fact that the factors are prime, we use `List.pmap`.
def jacobiSym (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : ℤ :=
(b.factors.pmap (fun p pp => @legendreSym p ⟨pp⟩ a) fun _ pf => prime_of_mem_factors pf).prod
#align jacobi_sym jacobiSym
-- Notation for the Jacobi symbol.
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[NumberTheorySymbols] notation "J(" a " | " b ")" => jacobiSym a b
-- Porting note: Without the following line, Lean expected `|` on several lines, e.g. line 102.
open NumberTheorySymbols
namespace jacobiSym
@[simp]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LegendreSymbol/JacobiSymbol.lean | 104 | 105 | theorem zero_right (a : ℤ) : J(a | 0) = 1 := by |
simp only [jacobiSym, factors_zero, List.prod_nil, List.pmap]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Rayleigh
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Decomposition
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Eigenspace.Minpoly
#align_import analysis.inner_product_space.spectrum from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6b0169218d01f2837d79ea2784882009a0da1aa1"
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 E _ x y
open scoped ComplexConjugate
open Module.End
namespace LinearMap
namespace IsSymmetric
variable {T : E →ₗ[𝕜] E} (hT : T.IsSymmetric)
theorem invariant_orthogonalComplement_eigenspace (μ : 𝕜) (v : E) (hv : v ∈ (eigenspace T μ)ᗮ) :
T v ∈ (eigenspace T μ)ᗮ := by
intro w hw
have : T w = (μ : 𝕜) • w := by rwa [mem_eigenspace_iff] at hw
simp [← hT w, this, inner_smul_left, hv w hw]
#align linear_map.is_symmetric.invariant_orthogonal_eigenspace LinearMap.IsSymmetric.invariant_orthogonalComplement_eigenspace
theorem conj_eigenvalue_eq_self {μ : 𝕜} (hμ : HasEigenvalue T μ) : conj μ = μ := by
obtain ⟨v, hv₁, hv₂⟩ := hμ.exists_hasEigenvector
rw [mem_eigenspace_iff] at hv₁
simpa [hv₂, inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, hv₁] using hT v v
#align linear_map.is_symmetric.conj_eigenvalue_eq_self LinearMap.IsSymmetric.conj_eigenvalue_eq_self
theorem orthogonalFamily_eigenspaces :
OrthogonalFamily 𝕜 (fun μ => eigenspace T μ) fun μ => (eigenspace T μ).subtypeₗᵢ := by
rintro μ ν hμν ⟨v, hv⟩ ⟨w, hw⟩
by_cases hv' : v = 0
· simp [hv']
have H := hT.conj_eigenvalue_eq_self (hasEigenvalue_of_hasEigenvector ⟨hv, hv'⟩)
rw [mem_eigenspace_iff] at hv hw
refine Or.resolve_left ?_ hμν.symm
simpa [inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, hv, hw, H] using (hT v w).symm
#align linear_map.is_symmetric.orthogonal_family_eigenspaces LinearMap.IsSymmetric.orthogonalFamily_eigenspaces
theorem orthogonalFamily_eigenspaces' :
OrthogonalFamily 𝕜 (fun μ : Eigenvalues T => eigenspace T μ) fun μ =>
(eigenspace T μ).subtypeₗᵢ :=
hT.orthogonalFamily_eigenspaces.comp Subtype.coe_injective
#align linear_map.is_symmetric.orthogonal_family_eigenspaces' LinearMap.IsSymmetric.orthogonalFamily_eigenspaces'
theorem orthogonalComplement_iSup_eigenspaces_invariant ⦃v : E⦄ (hv : v ∈ (⨆ μ, eigenspace T μ)ᗮ) :
T v ∈ (⨆ μ, eigenspace T μ)ᗮ := by
rw [← Submodule.iInf_orthogonal] at hv ⊢
exact T.iInf_invariant hT.invariant_orthogonalComplement_eigenspace v hv
#align linear_map.is_symmetric.orthogonal_supr_eigenspaces_invariant LinearMap.IsSymmetric.orthogonalComplement_iSup_eigenspaces_invariant
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Spectrum.lean | 110 | 115 | theorem orthogonalComplement_iSup_eigenspaces (μ : 𝕜) :
eigenspace (T.restrict hT.orthogonalComplement_iSup_eigenspaces_invariant) μ = ⊥ := by |
set p : Submodule 𝕜 E := (⨆ μ, eigenspace T μ)ᗮ
refine eigenspace_restrict_eq_bot hT.orthogonalComplement_iSup_eigenspaces_invariant ?_
have H₂ : eigenspace T μ ⟂ p := (Submodule.isOrtho_orthogonal_right _).mono_left (le_iSup _ _)
exact H₂.disjoint
|
import Mathlib.Topology.FiberBundle.Trivialization
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.LeftRightNhds
#align_import topology.fiber_bundle.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e473c3198bb41f68560cab68a0529c854b618833"
variable {ι B F X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
open TopologicalSpace Filter Set Bundle Topology
-- Porting note(#5171): was @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
structure FiberBundleCore (ι : Type*) (B : Type*) [TopologicalSpace B] (F : Type*)
[TopologicalSpace F] where
baseSet : ι → Set B
isOpen_baseSet : ∀ i, IsOpen (baseSet i)
indexAt : B → ι
mem_baseSet_at : ∀ x, x ∈ baseSet (indexAt x)
coordChange : ι → ι → B → F → F
coordChange_self : ∀ i, ∀ x ∈ baseSet i, ∀ v, coordChange i i x v = v
continuousOn_coordChange : ∀ i j,
ContinuousOn (fun p : B × F => coordChange i j p.1 p.2) ((baseSet i ∩ baseSet j) ×ˢ univ)
coordChange_comp : ∀ i j k, ∀ x ∈ baseSet i ∩ baseSet j ∩ baseSet k, ∀ v,
(coordChange j k x) (coordChange i j x v) = coordChange i k x v
#align fiber_bundle_core FiberBundleCore
namespace FiberBundleCore
variable [TopologicalSpace B] [TopologicalSpace F] (Z : FiberBundleCore ι B F)
@[nolint unusedArguments] -- Porting note(#5171): was has_nonempty_instance
def Index (_Z : FiberBundleCore ι B F) := ι
#align fiber_bundle_core.index FiberBundleCore.Index
@[nolint unusedArguments, reducible]
def Base (_Z : FiberBundleCore ι B F) := B
#align fiber_bundle_core.base FiberBundleCore.Base
@[nolint unusedArguments] -- Porting note(#5171): was has_nonempty_instance
def Fiber (_ : FiberBundleCore ι B F) (_x : B) := F
#align fiber_bundle_core.fiber FiberBundleCore.Fiber
instance topologicalSpaceFiber (x : B) : TopologicalSpace (Z.Fiber x) := ‹_›
#align fiber_bundle_core.topological_space_fiber FiberBundleCore.topologicalSpaceFiber
abbrev TotalSpace := Bundle.TotalSpace F Z.Fiber
#align fiber_bundle_core.total_space FiberBundleCore.TotalSpace
@[reducible, simp, mfld_simps]
def proj : Z.TotalSpace → B :=
Bundle.TotalSpace.proj
#align fiber_bundle_core.proj FiberBundleCore.proj
def trivChange (i j : ι) : PartialHomeomorph (B × F) (B × F) where
source := (Z.baseSet i ∩ Z.baseSet j) ×ˢ univ
target := (Z.baseSet i ∩ Z.baseSet j) ×ˢ univ
toFun p := ⟨p.1, Z.coordChange i j p.1 p.2⟩
invFun p := ⟨p.1, Z.coordChange j i p.1 p.2⟩
map_source' p hp := by simpa using hp
map_target' p hp := by simpa using hp
left_inv' := by
rintro ⟨x, v⟩ hx
simp only [prod_mk_mem_set_prod_eq, mem_inter_iff, and_true, mem_univ] at hx
dsimp only
rw [coordChange_comp, Z.coordChange_self]
exacts [hx.1, ⟨⟨hx.1, hx.2⟩, hx.1⟩]
right_inv' := by
rintro ⟨x, v⟩ hx
simp only [prod_mk_mem_set_prod_eq, mem_inter_iff, and_true_iff, mem_univ] at hx
dsimp only
rw [Z.coordChange_comp, Z.coordChange_self]
· exact hx.2
· simp [hx]
open_source := ((Z.isOpen_baseSet i).inter (Z.isOpen_baseSet j)).prod isOpen_univ
open_target := ((Z.isOpen_baseSet i).inter (Z.isOpen_baseSet j)).prod isOpen_univ
continuousOn_toFun := continuous_fst.continuousOn.prod (Z.continuousOn_coordChange i j)
continuousOn_invFun := by
simpa [inter_comm] using continuous_fst.continuousOn.prod (Z.continuousOn_coordChange j i)
#align fiber_bundle_core.triv_change FiberBundleCore.trivChange
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mem_trivChange_source (i j : ι) (p : B × F) :
p ∈ (Z.trivChange i j).source ↔ p.1 ∈ Z.baseSet i ∩ Z.baseSet j := by
erw [mem_prod]
simp
#align fiber_bundle_core.mem_triv_change_source FiberBundleCore.mem_trivChange_source
def localTrivAsPartialEquiv (i : ι) : PartialEquiv Z.TotalSpace (B × F) where
source := Z.proj ⁻¹' Z.baseSet i
target := Z.baseSet i ×ˢ univ
invFun p := ⟨p.1, Z.coordChange i (Z.indexAt p.1) p.1 p.2⟩
toFun p := ⟨p.1, Z.coordChange (Z.indexAt p.1) i p.1 p.2⟩
map_source' p hp := by
simpa only [Set.mem_preimage, and_true_iff, Set.mem_univ, Set.prod_mk_mem_set_prod_eq] using hp
map_target' p hp := by
simpa only [Set.mem_preimage, and_true_iff, Set.mem_univ, Set.mem_prod] using hp
left_inv' := by
rintro ⟨x, v⟩ hx
replace hx : x ∈ Z.baseSet i := hx
dsimp only
rw [Z.coordChange_comp, Z.coordChange_self] <;> apply_rules [mem_baseSet_at, mem_inter]
right_inv' := by
rintro ⟨x, v⟩ hx
simp only [prod_mk_mem_set_prod_eq, and_true_iff, mem_univ] at hx
dsimp only
rw [Z.coordChange_comp, Z.coordChange_self]
exacts [hx, ⟨⟨hx, Z.mem_baseSet_at _⟩, hx⟩]
#align fiber_bundle_core.local_triv_as_local_equiv FiberBundleCore.localTrivAsPartialEquiv
variable (i : ι)
theorem mem_localTrivAsPartialEquiv_source (p : Z.TotalSpace) :
p ∈ (Z.localTrivAsPartialEquiv i).source ↔ p.1 ∈ Z.baseSet i :=
Iff.rfl
#align fiber_bundle_core.mem_local_triv_as_local_equiv_source FiberBundleCore.mem_localTrivAsPartialEquiv_source
theorem mem_localTrivAsPartialEquiv_target (p : B × F) :
p ∈ (Z.localTrivAsPartialEquiv i).target ↔ p.1 ∈ Z.baseSet i := by
erw [mem_prod]
simp only [and_true_iff, mem_univ]
#align fiber_bundle_core.mem_local_triv_as_local_equiv_target FiberBundleCore.mem_localTrivAsPartialEquiv_target
theorem localTrivAsPartialEquiv_apply (p : Z.TotalSpace) :
(Z.localTrivAsPartialEquiv i) p = ⟨p.1, Z.coordChange (Z.indexAt p.1) i p.1 p.2⟩ :=
rfl
#align fiber_bundle_core.local_triv_as_local_equiv_apply FiberBundleCore.localTrivAsPartialEquiv_apply
theorem localTrivAsPartialEquiv_trans (i j : ι) :
(Z.localTrivAsPartialEquiv i).symm.trans (Z.localTrivAsPartialEquiv j) ≈
(Z.trivChange i j).toPartialEquiv := by
constructor
· ext x
simp only [mem_localTrivAsPartialEquiv_target, mfld_simps]
rfl
· rintro ⟨x, v⟩ hx
simp only [trivChange, localTrivAsPartialEquiv, PartialEquiv.symm, true_and_iff,
Prod.mk.inj_iff, prod_mk_mem_set_prod_eq, PartialEquiv.trans_source, mem_inter_iff,
and_true_iff, mem_preimage, proj, mem_univ, eq_self_iff_true, (· ∘ ·),
PartialEquiv.coe_trans, TotalSpace.proj] at hx ⊢
simp only [Z.coordChange_comp, hx, mem_inter_iff, and_self_iff, mem_baseSet_at]
#align fiber_bundle_core.local_triv_as_local_equiv_trans FiberBundleCore.localTrivAsPartialEquiv_trans
instance toTopologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace (Bundle.TotalSpace F Z.Fiber) :=
TopologicalSpace.generateFrom <| ⋃ (i : ι) (s : Set (B × F)) (_ : IsOpen s),
{(Z.localTrivAsPartialEquiv i).source ∩ Z.localTrivAsPartialEquiv i ⁻¹' s}
#align fiber_bundle_core.to_topological_space FiberBundleCore.toTopologicalSpace
variable (b : B) (a : F)
| Mathlib/Topology/FiberBundle/Basic.lean | 552 | 558 | theorem open_source' (i : ι) : IsOpen (Z.localTrivAsPartialEquiv i).source := by |
apply TopologicalSpace.GenerateOpen.basic
simp only [exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_singleton_iff]
refine ⟨i, Z.baseSet i ×ˢ univ, (Z.isOpen_baseSet i).prod isOpen_univ, ?_⟩
ext p
simp only [localTrivAsPartialEquiv_apply, prod_mk_mem_set_prod_eq, mem_inter_iff, and_self_iff,
mem_localTrivAsPartialEquiv_source, and_true, mem_univ, mem_preimage]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.LocalRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
#align_import algebra.char_p.mixed_char_zero from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
variable (R : Type*) [CommRing R]
class MixedCharZero (p : ℕ) : Prop where
[toCharZero : CharZero R]
charP_quotient : ∃ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ ∧ CharP (R ⧸ I) p
#align mixed_char_zero MixedCharZero
namespace EqualCharZero
theorem of_algebraRat [Algebra ℚ R] : ∀ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ → CharZero (R ⧸ I) := by
intro I hI
constructor
intro a b h_ab
contrapose! hI
-- `↑a - ↑b` is a unit contained in `I`, which contradicts `I ≠ ⊤`.
refine I.eq_top_of_isUnit_mem ?_ (IsUnit.map (algebraMap ℚ R) (IsUnit.mk0 (a - b : ℚ) ?_))
· simpa only [← Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem, map_sub, sub_eq_zero, map_natCast]
simpa only [Ne, sub_eq_zero] using (@Nat.cast_injective ℚ _ _).ne hI
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Q_algebra_to_equal_char_zero EqualCharZero.of_algebraRat
theorem of_not_mixedCharZero [CharZero R] (h : ∀ p > 0, ¬MixedCharZero R p) :
∀ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ → CharZero (R ⧸ I) := by
intro I hI_ne_top
suffices CharP (R ⧸ I) 0 from CharP.charP_to_charZero _
cases CharP.exists (R ⧸ I) with
| intro p hp =>
cases p with
| zero => exact hp
| succ p =>
have h_mixed : MixedCharZero R p.succ := ⟨⟨I, ⟨hI_ne_top, hp⟩⟩⟩
exact absurd h_mixed (h p.succ p.succ_pos)
#align not_mixed_char_to_equal_char_zero EqualCharZero.of_not_mixedCharZero
| Mathlib/Algebra/CharP/MixedCharZero.lean | 264 | 270 | theorem to_not_mixedCharZero (h : ∀ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ → CharZero (R ⧸ I)) :
∀ p > 0, ¬MixedCharZero R p := by |
intro p p_pos
by_contra hp_mixedChar
rcases hp_mixedChar.charP_quotient with ⟨I, hI_ne_top, hI_p⟩
replace hI_zero : CharP (R ⧸ I) 0 := @CharP.ofCharZero _ _ (h I hI_ne_top)
exact absurd (CharP.eq (R ⧸ I) hI_p hI_zero) (ne_of_gt p_pos)
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monad.Types
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monad.Limits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Equivalence
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.CompHaus.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Constructions
#align_import topology.category.Compactum from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
-- Porting note: "Compactum" is already upper case
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
universe u
open CategoryTheory Filter Ultrafilter TopologicalSpace CategoryTheory.Limits FiniteInter
open scoped Classical
open Topology
local notation "β" => ofTypeMonad Ultrafilter
def Compactum :=
Monad.Algebra β deriving Category, Inhabited
#align Compactum Compactum
namespace Compactum
def forget : Compactum ⥤ Type* :=
Monad.forget _ --deriving CreatesLimits, Faithful
-- Porting note: deriving fails, adding manually. Note `CreatesLimits` now noncomputable
#align Compactum.forget Compactum.forget
instance : forget.Faithful :=
show (Monad.forget _).Faithful from inferInstance
noncomputable instance : CreatesLimits forget :=
show CreatesLimits <| Monad.forget _ from inferInstance
def free : Type* ⥤ Compactum :=
Monad.free _
#align Compactum.free Compactum.free
def adj : free ⊣ forget :=
Monad.adj _
#align Compactum.adj Compactum.adj
-- Basic instances
instance : ConcreteCategory Compactum where forget := forget
-- Porting note: changed from forget to X.A
instance : CoeSort Compactum Type* :=
⟨fun X => X.A⟩
instance {X Y : Compactum} : CoeFun (X ⟶ Y) fun _ => X → Y :=
⟨fun f => f.f⟩
instance : HasLimits Compactum :=
hasLimits_of_hasLimits_createsLimits forget
def str (X : Compactum) : Ultrafilter X → X :=
X.a
#align Compactum.str Compactum.str
def join (X : Compactum) : Ultrafilter (Ultrafilter X) → Ultrafilter X :=
(β ).μ.app _
#align Compactum.join Compactum.join
def incl (X : Compactum) : X → Ultrafilter X :=
(β ).η.app _
#align Compactum.incl Compactum.incl
@[simp]
theorem str_incl (X : Compactum) (x : X) : X.str (X.incl x) = x := by
change ((β ).η.app _ ≫ X.a) _ = _
rw [Monad.Algebra.unit]
rfl
#align Compactum.str_incl Compactum.str_incl
@[simp]
theorem str_hom_commute (X Y : Compactum) (f : X ⟶ Y) (xs : Ultrafilter X) :
f (X.str xs) = Y.str (map f xs) := by
change (X.a ≫ f.f) _ = _
rw [← f.h]
rfl
#align Compactum.str_hom_commute Compactum.str_hom_commute
@[simp]
theorem join_distrib (X : Compactum) (uux : Ultrafilter (Ultrafilter X)) :
X.str (X.join uux) = X.str (map X.str uux) := by
change ((β ).μ.app _ ≫ X.a) _ = _
rw [Monad.Algebra.assoc]
rfl
#align Compactum.join_distrib Compactum.join_distrib
-- Porting note: changes to X.A from X since Lean can't see through X to X.A below
instance {X : Compactum} : TopologicalSpace X.A where
IsOpen U := ∀ F : Ultrafilter X, X.str F ∈ U → U ∈ F
isOpen_univ _ _ := Filter.univ_sets _
isOpen_inter _ _ h3 h4 _ h6 := Filter.inter_sets _ (h3 _ h6.1) (h4 _ h6.2)
isOpen_sUnion := fun _ h1 _ ⟨T, hT, h2⟩ =>
mem_of_superset (h1 T hT _ h2) (Set.subset_sUnion_of_mem hT)
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/Compactum.lean | 173 | 185 | theorem isClosed_iff {X : Compactum} (S : Set X) :
IsClosed S ↔ ∀ F : Ultrafilter X, S ∈ F → X.str F ∈ S := by |
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff]
constructor
· intro cond F h
by_contra c
specialize cond F c
rw [compl_mem_iff_not_mem] at cond
contradiction
· intro h1 F h2
specialize h1 F
cases' F.mem_or_compl_mem S with h h
exacts [absurd (h1 h) h2, h]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Canonical.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Nonneg.Field
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Nonneg.Floor
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Group
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr.Core
#align_import data.real.nnreal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b1abe23ae96fef89ad30d9f4362c307f72a55010"
open Function
-- to ensure these instances are computable
def NNReal := { r : ℝ // 0 ≤ r } deriving
Zero, One, Semiring, StrictOrderedSemiring, CommMonoidWithZero, CommSemiring,
SemilatticeInf, SemilatticeSup, DistribLattice, OrderedCommSemiring,
CanonicallyOrderedCommSemiring, Inhabited
#align nnreal NNReal
namespace NNReal
scoped notation "ℝ≥0" => NNReal
noncomputable instance : FloorSemiring ℝ≥0 := Nonneg.floorSemiring
instance instDenselyOrdered : DenselyOrdered ℝ≥0 := Nonneg.instDenselyOrdered
instance : OrderBot ℝ≥0 := inferInstance
instance : Archimedean ℝ≥0 := Nonneg.archimedean
noncomputable instance : Sub ℝ≥0 := Nonneg.sub
noncomputable instance : OrderedSub ℝ≥0 := Nonneg.orderedSub
noncomputable instance : CanonicallyLinearOrderedSemifield ℝ≥0 :=
Nonneg.canonicallyLinearOrderedSemifield
@[coe] def toReal : ℝ≥0 → ℝ := Subtype.val
instance : Coe ℝ≥0 ℝ := ⟨toReal⟩
-- Simp lemma to put back `n.val` into the normal form given by the coercion.
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_coe (n : ℝ≥0) : n.val = n :=
rfl
#align nnreal.val_eq_coe NNReal.val_eq_coe
instance canLift : CanLift ℝ ℝ≥0 toReal fun r => 0 ≤ r :=
Subtype.canLift _
#align nnreal.can_lift NNReal.canLift
@[ext] protected theorem eq {n m : ℝ≥0} : (n : ℝ) = (m : ℝ) → n = m :=
Subtype.eq
#align nnreal.eq NNReal.eq
protected theorem eq_iff {n m : ℝ≥0} : (n : ℝ) = (m : ℝ) ↔ n = m :=
Subtype.ext_iff.symm
#align nnreal.eq_iff NNReal.eq_iff
theorem ne_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} : (x : ℝ) ≠ (y : ℝ) ↔ x ≠ y :=
not_congr <| NNReal.eq_iff
#align nnreal.ne_iff NNReal.ne_iff
protected theorem «forall» {p : ℝ≥0 → Prop} :
(∀ x : ℝ≥0, p x) ↔ ∀ (x : ℝ) (hx : 0 ≤ x), p ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
Subtype.forall
#align nnreal.forall NNReal.forall
protected theorem «exists» {p : ℝ≥0 → Prop} :
(∃ x : ℝ≥0, p x) ↔ ∃ (x : ℝ) (hx : 0 ≤ x), p ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
Subtype.exists
#align nnreal.exists NNReal.exists
noncomputable def _root_.Real.toNNReal (r : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 :=
⟨max r 0, le_max_right _ _⟩
#align real.to_nnreal Real.toNNReal
theorem _root_.Real.coe_toNNReal (r : ℝ) (hr : 0 ≤ r) : (Real.toNNReal r : ℝ) = r :=
max_eq_left hr
#align real.coe_to_nnreal Real.coe_toNNReal
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_of_nonneg {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) : r.toNNReal = ⟨r, hr⟩ := by
simp_rw [Real.toNNReal, max_eq_left hr]
#align real.to_nnreal_of_nonneg Real.toNNReal_of_nonneg
theorem _root_.Real.le_coe_toNNReal (r : ℝ) : r ≤ Real.toNNReal r :=
le_max_left r 0
#align real.le_coe_to_nnreal Real.le_coe_toNNReal
theorem coe_nonneg (r : ℝ≥0) : (0 : ℝ) ≤ r := r.2
#align nnreal.coe_nonneg NNReal.coe_nonneg
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_mk (a : ℝ) (ha) : toReal ⟨a, ha⟩ = a := rfl
#align nnreal.coe_mk NNReal.coe_mk
example : Zero ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : One ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : Add ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
noncomputable example : Sub ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : Mul ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
noncomputable example : Inv ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
noncomputable example : Div ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : LE ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : Bot ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : Inhabited ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : Nontrivial ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
protected theorem coe_injective : Injective ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) := Subtype.coe_injective
#align nnreal.coe_injective NNReal.coe_injective
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_inj {r₁ r₂ : ℝ≥0} : (r₁ : ℝ) = r₂ ↔ r₁ = r₂ :=
NNReal.coe_injective.eq_iff
#align nnreal.coe_eq NNReal.coe_inj
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-03")] protected alias coe_eq := coe_inj
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ((0 : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = 0 := rfl
#align nnreal.coe_zero NNReal.coe_zero
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_one : ((1 : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = 1 := rfl
#align nnreal.coe_one NNReal.coe_one
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected theorem coe_add (r₁ r₂ : ℝ≥0) : ((r₁ + r₂ : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = r₁ + r₂ :=
rfl
#align nnreal.coe_add NNReal.coe_add
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected theorem coe_mul (r₁ r₂ : ℝ≥0) : ((r₁ * r₂ : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = r₁ * r₂ :=
rfl
#align nnreal.coe_mul NNReal.coe_mul
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected theorem coe_inv (r : ℝ≥0) : ((r⁻¹ : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (r : ℝ)⁻¹ :=
rfl
#align nnreal.coe_inv NNReal.coe_inv
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected theorem coe_div (r₁ r₂ : ℝ≥0) : ((r₁ / r₂ : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (r₁ : ℝ) / r₂ :=
rfl
#align nnreal.coe_div NNReal.coe_div
#noalign nnreal.coe_bit0
#noalign nnreal.coe_bit1
protected theorem coe_two : ((2 : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = 2 := rfl
#align nnreal.coe_two NNReal.coe_two
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected theorem coe_sub {r₁ r₂ : ℝ≥0} (h : r₂ ≤ r₁) : ((r₁ - r₂ : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = ↑r₁ - ↑r₂ :=
max_eq_left <| le_sub_comm.2 <| by simp [show (r₂ : ℝ) ≤ r₁ from h]
#align nnreal.coe_sub NNReal.coe_sub
variable {r r₁ r₂ : ℝ≥0} {x y : ℝ}
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_eq_zero : (r : ℝ) = 0 ↔ r = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, coe_inj]
#align coe_eq_zero NNReal.coe_eq_zero
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_eq_one : (r : ℝ) = 1 ↔ r = 1 := by rw [← coe_one, coe_inj]
#align coe_inj_one NNReal.coe_eq_one
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_ne_zero : (r : ℝ) ≠ 0 ↔ r ≠ 0 := coe_eq_zero.not
#align nnreal.coe_ne_zero NNReal.coe_ne_zero
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_ne_one : (r : ℝ) ≠ 1 ↔ r ≠ 1 := coe_eq_one.not
example : CommSemiring ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
def toRealHom : ℝ≥0 →+* ℝ where
toFun := (↑)
map_one' := NNReal.coe_one
map_mul' := NNReal.coe_mul
map_zero' := NNReal.coe_zero
map_add' := NNReal.coe_add
#align nnreal.to_real_hom NNReal.toRealHom
@[simp] theorem coe_toRealHom : ⇑toRealHom = toReal := rfl
#align nnreal.coe_to_real_hom NNReal.coe_toRealHom
example : MonoidWithZero ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : CommMonoidWithZero ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
noncomputable example : CommGroupWithZero ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_indicator {α} (s : Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) (a : α) :
((s.indicator f a : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = s.indicator (fun x => ↑(f x)) a :=
(toRealHom : ℝ≥0 →+ ℝ).map_indicator _ _ _
#align nnreal.coe_indicator NNReal.coe_indicator
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_pow (r : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) : ((r ^ n : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (r : ℝ) ^ n := rfl
#align nnreal.coe_pow NNReal.coe_pow
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zpow (r : ℝ≥0) (n : ℤ) : ((r ^ n : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (r : ℝ) ^ n := rfl
#align nnreal.coe_zpow NNReal.coe_zpow
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_list_sum (l : List ℝ≥0) : ((l.sum : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (l.map (↑)).sum :=
map_list_sum toRealHom l
#align nnreal.coe_list_sum NNReal.coe_list_sum
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_list_prod (l : List ℝ≥0) : ((l.prod : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (l.map (↑)).prod :=
map_list_prod toRealHom l
#align nnreal.coe_list_prod NNReal.coe_list_prod
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_multiset_sum (s : Multiset ℝ≥0) : ((s.sum : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (s.map (↑)).sum :=
map_multiset_sum toRealHom s
#align nnreal.coe_multiset_sum NNReal.coe_multiset_sum
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_multiset_prod (s : Multiset ℝ≥0) : ((s.prod : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (s.map (↑)).prod :=
map_multiset_prod toRealHom s
#align nnreal.coe_multiset_prod NNReal.coe_multiset_prod
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_sum {α} {s : Finset α} {f : α → ℝ≥0} : ↑(∑ a ∈ s, f a) = ∑ a ∈ s, (f a : ℝ) :=
map_sum toRealHom _ _
#align nnreal.coe_sum NNReal.coe_sum
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_sum_of_nonneg {α} {s : Finset α} {f : α → ℝ}
(hf : ∀ a, a ∈ s → 0 ≤ f a) :
Real.toNNReal (∑ a ∈ s, f a) = ∑ a ∈ s, Real.toNNReal (f a) := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_sum, Real.coe_toNNReal _ (Finset.sum_nonneg hf)]
exact Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x hxs => by rw [Real.coe_toNNReal _ (hf x hxs)]
#align real.to_nnreal_sum_of_nonneg Real.toNNReal_sum_of_nonneg
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_prod {α} {s : Finset α} {f : α → ℝ≥0} : ↑(∏ a ∈ s, f a) = ∏ a ∈ s, (f a : ℝ) :=
map_prod toRealHom _ _
#align nnreal.coe_prod NNReal.coe_prod
| Mathlib/Data/Real/NNReal.lean | 345 | 349 | theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_prod_of_nonneg {α} {s : Finset α} {f : α → ℝ}
(hf : ∀ a, a ∈ s → 0 ≤ f a) :
Real.toNNReal (∏ a ∈ s, f a) = ∏ a ∈ s, Real.toNNReal (f a) := by |
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_prod, Real.coe_toNNReal _ (Finset.prod_nonneg hf)]
exact Finset.prod_congr rfl fun x hxs => by rw [Real.coe_toNNReal _ (hf x hxs)]
|
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.UnorderedInterval
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Monoid
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.MinMax
#align_import data.set.pointwise.interval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
open Interval Pointwise
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Set
section LinearOrderedField
variable [LinearOrderedField α] {a : α}
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Iio (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Iio a = Iio (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (lt_div_iff h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Iio Set.preimage_mul_const_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioi (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioi a = Ioi (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (div_lt_iff h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ioi Set.preimage_mul_const_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Iic (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Iic a = Iic (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (le_div_iff h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Iic Set.preimage_mul_const_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ici (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ici a = Ici (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (div_le_iff h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ici Set.preimage_mul_const_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioo (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioo a b = Ioo (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, h]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ioo Set.preimage_mul_const_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioc (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioc a b = Ioc (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, h]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ioc Set.preimage_mul_const_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ico (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ico a b = Ico (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iio, h]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ico Set.preimage_mul_const_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Icc (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Icc a b = Icc (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, h]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Icc Set.preimage_mul_const_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Iio_of_neg (a : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Iio a = Ioi (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (div_lt_iff_of_neg h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Iio_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Iio_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioi_of_neg (a : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioi a = Iio (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (lt_div_iff_of_neg h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ioi_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Ioi_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Iic_of_neg (a : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Iic a = Ici (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (div_le_iff_of_neg h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Iic_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Iic_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ici_of_neg (a : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ici a = Iic (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (le_div_iff_of_neg h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ici_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Ici_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioo_of_neg (a b : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioo a b = Ioo (b / c) (a / c) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, h, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ioo_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Ioo_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioc_of_neg (a b : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioc a b = Ico (b / c) (a / c) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, h, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ioc_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Ioc_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ico_of_neg (a b : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ico a b = Ioc (b / c) (a / c) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← Ioi_inter_Iic, h, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ico_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Ico_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Icc_of_neg (a b : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Icc a b = Icc (b / c) (a / c) := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, h, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Icc_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Icc_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Iio (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) : (c * ·) ⁻¹' Iio a = Iio (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (lt_div_iff' h).symm
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Iio Set.preimage_const_mul_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ioi (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) : (c * ·) ⁻¹' Ioi a = Ioi (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (div_lt_iff' h).symm
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ioi Set.preimage_const_mul_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Iic (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) : (c * ·) ⁻¹' Iic a = Iic (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (le_div_iff' h).symm
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Iic Set.preimage_const_mul_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ici (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) : (c * ·) ⁻¹' Ici a = Ici (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (div_le_iff' h).symm
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ici Set.preimage_const_mul_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ioo (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Ioo a b = Ioo (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, h]
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ioo Set.preimage_const_mul_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ioc (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Ioc a b = Ioc (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, h]
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ioc Set.preimage_const_mul_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ico (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Ico a b = Ico (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iio, h]
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ico Set.preimage_const_mul_Ico
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Pointwise/Interval.lean | 720 | 721 | theorem preimage_const_mul_Icc (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Icc a b = Icc (a / c) (b / c) := by | simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, h]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Data.SProd
#align_import data.set.prod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"48fb5b5280e7c81672afc9524185ae994553ebf4"
open Function
namespace Set
section Prod
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {t t₁ t₂ : Set β} {a : α} {b : β}
theorem Subsingleton.prod (hs : s.Subsingleton) (ht : t.Subsingleton) :
(s ×ˢ t).Subsingleton := fun _x hx _y hy ↦
Prod.ext (hs hx.1 hy.1) (ht hx.2 hy.2)
noncomputable instance decidableMemProd [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] :
DecidablePred (· ∈ s ×ˢ t) := fun _ => And.decidable
#align set.decidable_mem_prod Set.decidableMemProd
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ t₂ :=
fun _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨hs h₁, ht h₂⟩
#align set.prod_mono Set.prod_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_left (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ×ˢ t ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ t :=
prod_mono hs Subset.rfl
#align set.prod_mono_left Set.prod_mono_left
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_right (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ×ˢ t₁ ⊆ s ×ˢ t₂ :=
prod_mono Subset.rfl ht
#align set.prod_mono_right Set.prod_mono_right
@[simp]
theorem prod_self_subset_prod_self : s₁ ×ˢ s₁ ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
⟨fun h _ hx => (h (mk_mem_prod hx hx)).1, fun h _ hx => ⟨h hx.1, h hx.2⟩⟩
#align set.prod_self_subset_prod_self Set.prod_self_subset_prod_self
@[simp]
theorem prod_self_ssubset_prod_self : s₁ ×ˢ s₁ ⊂ s₂ ×ˢ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
and_congr prod_self_subset_prod_self <| not_congr prod_self_subset_prod_self
#align set.prod_self_ssubset_prod_self Set.prod_self_ssubset_prod_self
theorem prod_subset_iff {P : Set (α × β)} : s ×ˢ t ⊆ P ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ P :=
⟨fun h _ hx _ hy => h (mk_mem_prod hx hy), fun h ⟨_, _⟩ hp => h _ hp.1 _ hp.2⟩
#align set.prod_subset_iff Set.prod_subset_iff
theorem forall_prod_set {p : α × β → Prop} : (∀ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, p (x, y) :=
prod_subset_iff
#align set.forall_prod_set Set.forall_prod_set
theorem exists_prod_set {p : α × β → Prop} : (∃ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, p (x, y) := by
simp [and_assoc]
#align set.exists_prod_set Set.exists_prod_set
@[simp]
theorem prod_empty : s ×ˢ (∅ : Set β) = ∅ := by
ext
exact and_false_iff _
#align set.prod_empty Set.prod_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_prod : (∅ : Set α) ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext
exact false_and_iff _
#align set.empty_prod Set.empty_prod
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem univ_prod_univ : @univ α ×ˢ @univ β = univ := by
ext
exact true_and_iff _
#align set.univ_prod_univ Set.univ_prod_univ
theorem univ_prod {t : Set β} : (univ : Set α) ×ˢ t = Prod.snd ⁻¹' t := by simp [prod_eq]
#align set.univ_prod Set.univ_prod
theorem prod_univ {s : Set α} : s ×ˢ (univ : Set β) = Prod.fst ⁻¹' s := by simp [prod_eq]
#align set.prod_univ Set.prod_univ
@[simp] lemma prod_eq_univ [Nonempty α] [Nonempty β] : s ×ˢ t = univ ↔ s = univ ∧ t = univ := by
simp [eq_univ_iff_forall, forall_and]
@[simp]
theorem singleton_prod : ({a} : Set α) ×ˢ t = Prod.mk a '' t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
#align set.singleton_prod Set.singleton_prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_singleton : s ×ˢ ({b} : Set β) = (fun a => (a, b)) '' s := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
#align set.prod_singleton Set.prod_singleton
theorem singleton_prod_singleton : ({a} : Set α) ×ˢ ({b} : Set β) = {(a, b)} := by simp
#align set.singleton_prod_singleton Set.singleton_prod_singleton
@[simp]
theorem union_prod : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ∪ s₂ ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [or_and_right]
#align set.union_prod Set.union_prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_union : s ×ˢ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s ×ˢ t₁ ∪ s ×ˢ t₂ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_or_left]
#align set.prod_union Set.prod_union
theorem inter_prod : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ∩ s₂ ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [← and_and_right, mem_inter_iff, mem_prod]
#align set.inter_prod Set.inter_prod
theorem prod_inter : s ×ˢ (t₁ ∩ t₂) = s ×ˢ t₁ ∩ s ×ˢ t₂ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [← and_and_left, mem_inter_iff, mem_prod]
#align set.prod_inter Set.prod_inter
@[mfld_simps]
theorem prod_inter_prod : s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ∩ s₂ ×ˢ t₂ = (s₁ ∩ s₂) ×ˢ (t₁ ∩ t₂) := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_assoc, and_left_comm]
#align set.prod_inter_prod Set.prod_inter_prod
lemma compl_prod_eq_union {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
(s ×ˢ t)ᶜ = (sᶜ ×ˢ univ) ∪ (univ ×ˢ tᶜ) := by
ext p
simp only [mem_compl_iff, mem_prod, not_and, mem_union, mem_univ, and_true, true_and]
constructor <;> intro h
· by_cases fst_in_s : p.fst ∈ s
· exact Or.inr (h fst_in_s)
· exact Or.inl fst_in_s
· intro fst_in_s
simpa only [fst_in_s, not_true, false_or] using h
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_prod : Disjoint (s₁ ×ˢ t₁) (s₂ ×ˢ t₂) ↔ Disjoint s₁ s₂ ∨ Disjoint t₁ t₂ := by
simp_rw [disjoint_left, mem_prod, not_and_or, Prod.forall, and_imp, ← @forall_or_right α, ←
@forall_or_left β, ← @forall_or_right (_ ∈ s₁), ← @forall_or_left (_ ∈ t₁)]
#align set.disjoint_prod Set.disjoint_prod
theorem Disjoint.set_prod_left (hs : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (t₁ t₂ : Set β) :
Disjoint (s₁ ×ˢ t₁) (s₂ ×ˢ t₂) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun ⟨_a, _b⟩ ⟨ha₁, _⟩ ⟨ha₂, _⟩ => disjoint_left.1 hs ha₁ ha₂
#align set.disjoint.set_prod_left Set.Disjoint.set_prod_left
theorem Disjoint.set_prod_right (ht : Disjoint t₁ t₂) (s₁ s₂ : Set α) :
Disjoint (s₁ ×ˢ t₁) (s₂ ×ˢ t₂) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun ⟨_a, _b⟩ ⟨_, hb₁⟩ ⟨_, hb₂⟩ => disjoint_left.1 ht hb₁ hb₂
#align set.disjoint.set_prod_right Set.Disjoint.set_prod_right
theorem insert_prod : insert a s ×ˢ t = Prod.mk a '' t ∪ s ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [image, iff_def, or_imp]
#align set.insert_prod Set.insert_prod
theorem prod_insert : s ×ˢ insert b t = (fun a => (a, b)) '' s ∪ s ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
-- porting note (#10745):
-- was `simp (config := { contextual := true }) [image, iff_def, or_imp, Imp.swap]`
simp only [mem_prod, mem_insert_iff, image, mem_union, mem_setOf_eq, Prod.mk.injEq]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨hx, rfl|hy⟩ := h
· exact Or.inl ⟨x, hx, rfl, rfl⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨hx, hy⟩
· obtain ⟨x, hx, rfl, rfl⟩|⟨hx, hy⟩ := h
· exact ⟨hx, Or.inl rfl⟩
· exact ⟨hx, Or.inr hy⟩
#align set.prod_insert Set.prod_insert
theorem prod_preimage_eq {f : γ → α} {g : δ → β} :
(f ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ (g ⁻¹' t) = (fun p : γ × δ => (f p.1, g p.2)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
#align set.prod_preimage_eq Set.prod_preimage_eq
theorem prod_preimage_left {f : γ → α} :
(f ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ t = (fun p : γ × β => (f p.1, p.2)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
#align set.prod_preimage_left Set.prod_preimage_left
theorem prod_preimage_right {g : δ → β} :
s ×ˢ (g ⁻¹' t) = (fun p : α × δ => (p.1, g p.2)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
#align set.prod_preimage_right Set.prod_preimage_right
theorem preimage_prod_map_prod (f : α → β) (g : γ → δ) (s : Set β) (t : Set δ) :
Prod.map f g ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = (f ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ (g ⁻¹' t) :=
rfl
#align set.preimage_prod_map_prod Set.preimage_prod_map_prod
theorem mk_preimage_prod (f : γ → α) (g : γ → β) :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = f ⁻¹' s ∩ g ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
#align set.mk_preimage_prod Set.mk_preimage_prod
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left (hb : b ∈ t) : (fun a => (a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = s := by
ext a
simp [hb]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_left Set.mk_preimage_prod_left
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right (ha : a ∈ s) : Prod.mk a ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = t := by
ext b
simp [ha]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_right Set.mk_preimage_prod_right
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_empty (hb : b ∉ t) : (fun a => (a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext a
simp [hb]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_empty Set.mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_empty (ha : a ∉ s) : Prod.mk a ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext b
simp [ha]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_empty Set.mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_empty
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] :
(fun a => (a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if b ∈ t then s else ∅ := by split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if Set.mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] :
Prod.mk a ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if a ∈ s then t else ∅ := by split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if Set.mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left_fn_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] (f : γ → α) :
(fun a => (f a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if b ∈ t then f ⁻¹' s else ∅ := by
rw [← mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if, prod_preimage_left, preimage_preimage]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_left_fn_eq_if Set.mk_preimage_prod_left_fn_eq_if
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right_fn_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (g : δ → β) :
(fun b => (a, g b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if a ∈ s then g ⁻¹' t else ∅ := by
rw [← mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if, prod_preimage_right, preimage_preimage]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_right_fn_eq_if Set.mk_preimage_prod_right_fn_eq_if
@[simp]
theorem preimage_swap_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : Prod.swap ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = t ×ˢ s := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_comm]
#align set.preimage_swap_prod Set.preimage_swap_prod
@[simp]
theorem image_swap_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : Prod.swap '' s ×ˢ t = t ×ˢ s := by
rw [image_swap_eq_preimage_swap, preimage_swap_prod]
#align set.image_swap_prod Set.image_swap_prod
theorem prod_image_image_eq {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} :
(m₁ '' s) ×ˢ (m₂ '' t) = (fun p : α × β => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) '' s ×ˢ t :=
ext <| by
simp [-exists_and_right, exists_and_right.symm, and_left_comm, and_assoc, and_comm]
#align set.prod_image_image_eq Set.prod_image_image_eq
theorem prod_range_range_eq {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} :
range m₁ ×ˢ range m₂ = range fun p : α × β => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2) :=
ext <| by simp [range]
#align set.prod_range_range_eq Set.prod_range_range_eq
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem range_prod_map {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} : range (Prod.map m₁ m₂) = range m₁ ×ˢ range m₂ :=
prod_range_range_eq.symm
#align set.range_prod_map Set.range_prod_map
theorem prod_range_univ_eq {m₁ : α → γ} :
range m₁ ×ˢ (univ : Set β) = range fun p : α × β => (m₁ p.1, p.2) :=
ext <| by simp [range]
#align set.prod_range_univ_eq Set.prod_range_univ_eq
theorem prod_univ_range_eq {m₂ : β → δ} :
(univ : Set α) ×ˢ range m₂ = range fun p : α × β => (p.1, m₂ p.2) :=
ext <| by simp [range]
#align set.prod_univ_range_eq Set.prod_univ_range_eq
theorem range_pair_subset (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) :
(range fun x => (f x, g x)) ⊆ range f ×ˢ range g := by
have : (fun x => (f x, g x)) = Prod.map f g ∘ fun x => (x, x) := funext fun x => rfl
rw [this, ← range_prod_map]
apply range_comp_subset_range
#align set.range_pair_subset Set.range_pair_subset
theorem Nonempty.prod : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ =>
⟨(x, y), ⟨hx, hy⟩⟩
#align set.nonempty.prod Set.Nonempty.prod
theorem Nonempty.fst : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨x.1, hx.1⟩
#align set.nonempty.fst Set.Nonempty.fst
theorem Nonempty.snd : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨x.2, hx.2⟩
#align set.nonempty.snd Set.Nonempty.snd
@[simp]
theorem prod_nonempty_iff : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.fst, h.snd⟩, fun h => h.1.prod h.2⟩
#align set.prod_nonempty_iff Set.prod_nonempty_iff
@[simp]
theorem prod_eq_empty_iff : s ×ˢ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
simp only [not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.symm, prod_nonempty_iff, not_and_or]
#align set.prod_eq_empty_iff Set.prod_eq_empty_iff
theorem prod_sub_preimage_iff {W : Set γ} {f : α × β → γ} :
s ×ˢ t ⊆ f ⁻¹' W ↔ ∀ a b, a ∈ s → b ∈ t → f (a, b) ∈ W := by simp [subset_def]
#align set.prod_sub_preimage_iff Set.prod_sub_preimage_iff
theorem image_prod_mk_subset_prod {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} {s : Set α} :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) '' s ⊆ (f '' s) ×ˢ (g '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact mk_mem_prod (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem g hx)
#align set.image_prod_mk_subset_prod Set.image_prod_mk_subset_prod
theorem image_prod_mk_subset_prod_left (hb : b ∈ t) : (fun a => (a, b)) '' s ⊆ s ×ˢ t := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact ⟨ha, hb⟩
#align set.image_prod_mk_subset_prod_left Set.image_prod_mk_subset_prod_left
theorem image_prod_mk_subset_prod_right (ha : a ∈ s) : Prod.mk a '' t ⊆ s ×ˢ t := by
rintro _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩
exact ⟨ha, hb⟩
#align set.image_prod_mk_subset_prod_right Set.image_prod_mk_subset_prod_right
theorem prod_subset_preimage_fst (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : s ×ˢ t ⊆ Prod.fst ⁻¹' s :=
inter_subset_left
#align set.prod_subset_preimage_fst Set.prod_subset_preimage_fst
theorem fst_image_prod_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : Prod.fst '' s ×ˢ t ⊆ s :=
image_subset_iff.2 <| prod_subset_preimage_fst s t
#align set.fst_image_prod_subset Set.fst_image_prod_subset
theorem fst_image_prod (s : Set β) {t : Set α} (ht : t.Nonempty) : Prod.fst '' s ×ˢ t = s :=
(fst_image_prod_subset _ _).antisymm fun y hy =>
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := ht
⟨(y, x), ⟨hy, hx⟩, rfl⟩
#align set.fst_image_prod Set.fst_image_prod
theorem prod_subset_preimage_snd (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : s ×ˢ t ⊆ Prod.snd ⁻¹' t :=
inter_subset_right
#align set.prod_subset_preimage_snd Set.prod_subset_preimage_snd
theorem snd_image_prod_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : Prod.snd '' s ×ˢ t ⊆ t :=
image_subset_iff.2 <| prod_subset_preimage_snd s t
#align set.snd_image_prod_subset Set.snd_image_prod_subset
theorem snd_image_prod {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (t : Set β) : Prod.snd '' s ×ˢ t = t :=
(snd_image_prod_subset _ _).antisymm fun y y_in =>
let ⟨x, x_in⟩ := hs
⟨(x, y), ⟨x_in, y_in⟩, rfl⟩
#align set.snd_image_prod Set.snd_image_prod
theorem prod_diff_prod : s ×ˢ t \ s₁ ×ˢ t₁ = s ×ˢ (t \ t₁) ∪ (s \ s₁) ×ˢ t := by
ext x
by_cases h₁ : x.1 ∈ s₁ <;> by_cases h₂ : x.2 ∈ t₁ <;> simp [*]
#align set.prod_diff_prod Set.prod_diff_prod
theorem prod_subset_prod_iff : s ×ˢ t ⊆ s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ↔ s ⊆ s₁ ∧ t ⊆ t₁ ∨ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
rcases (s ×ˢ t).eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· simp [h, prod_eq_empty_iff.1 h]
have st : s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty := by rwa [prod_nonempty_iff] at h
refine ⟨fun H => Or.inl ⟨?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· have := image_subset (Prod.fst : α × β → α) H
rwa [fst_image_prod _ st.2, fst_image_prod _ (h.mono H).snd] at this
· have := image_subset (Prod.snd : α × β → β) H
rwa [snd_image_prod st.1, snd_image_prod (h.mono H).fst] at this
· intro H
simp only [st.1.ne_empty, st.2.ne_empty, or_false_iff] at H
exact prod_mono H.1 H.2
#align set.prod_subset_prod_iff Set.prod_subset_prod_iff
theorem prod_eq_prod_iff_of_nonempty (h : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty) :
s ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ↔ s = s₁ ∧ t = t₁ := by
constructor
· intro heq
have h₁ : (s₁ ×ˢ t₁ : Set _).Nonempty := by rwa [← heq]
rw [prod_nonempty_iff] at h h₁
rw [← fst_image_prod s h.2, ← fst_image_prod s₁ h₁.2, heq, eq_self_iff_true, true_and_iff, ←
snd_image_prod h.1 t, ← snd_image_prod h₁.1 t₁, heq]
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
rfl
#align set.prod_eq_prod_iff_of_nonempty Set.prod_eq_prod_iff_of_nonempty
theorem prod_eq_prod_iff :
s ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ↔ s = s₁ ∧ t = t₁ ∨ (s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅) ∧ (s₁ = ∅ ∨ t₁ = ∅) := by
symm
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty (s ×ˢ t) with h | h
· simp_rw [h, @eq_comm _ ∅, prod_eq_empty_iff, prod_eq_empty_iff.mp h, true_and_iff,
or_iff_right_iff_imp]
rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact prod_eq_empty_iff.mp h
rw [prod_eq_prod_iff_of_nonempty h]
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, prod_eq_empty_iff] at h
simp_rw [h, false_and_iff, or_false_iff]
#align set.prod_eq_prod_iff Set.prod_eq_prod_iff
@[simp]
theorem prod_eq_iff_eq (ht : t.Nonempty) : s ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ↔ s = s₁ := by
simp_rw [prod_eq_prod_iff, ht.ne_empty, and_true_iff, or_iff_left_iff_imp,
or_false_iff]
rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
rfl
#align set.prod_eq_iff_eq Set.prod_eq_iff_eq
section Diagonal
variable {α : Type*} {s t : Set α}
lemma diagonal_nonempty [Nonempty α] : (diagonal α).Nonempty :=
Nonempty.elim ‹_› fun x => ⟨_, mem_diagonal x⟩
#align set.diagonal_nonempty Set.diagonal_nonempty
instance decidableMemDiagonal [h : DecidableEq α] (x : α × α) : Decidable (x ∈ diagonal α) :=
h x.1 x.2
#align set.decidable_mem_diagonal Set.decidableMemDiagonal
theorem preimage_coe_coe_diagonal (s : Set α) :
Prod.map (fun x : s => (x : α)) (fun x : s => (x : α)) ⁻¹' diagonal α = diagonal s := by
ext ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨y, hy⟩⟩
simp [Set.diagonal]
#align set.preimage_coe_coe_diagonal Set.preimage_coe_coe_diagonal
@[simp]
theorem range_diag : (range fun x => (x, x)) = diagonal α := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [diagonal, eq_comm]
#align set.range_diag Set.range_diag
theorem diagonal_subset_iff {s} : diagonal α ⊆ s ↔ ∀ x, (x, x) ∈ s := by
rw [← range_diag, range_subset_iff]
#align set.diagonal_subset_iff Set.diagonal_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem prod_subset_compl_diagonal_iff_disjoint : s ×ˢ t ⊆ (diagonal α)ᶜ ↔ Disjoint s t :=
prod_subset_iff.trans disjoint_iff_forall_ne.symm
#align set.prod_subset_compl_diagonal_iff_disjoint Set.prod_subset_compl_diagonal_iff_disjoint
@[simp]
theorem diag_preimage_prod (s t : Set α) : (fun x => (x, x)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = s ∩ t :=
rfl
#align set.diag_preimage_prod Set.diag_preimage_prod
theorem diag_preimage_prod_self (s : Set α) : (fun x => (x, x)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ s = s :=
inter_self s
#align set.diag_preimage_prod_self Set.diag_preimage_prod_self
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Prod.lean | 507 | 508 | theorem diag_image (s : Set α) : (fun x => (x, x)) '' s = diagonal α ∩ s ×ˢ s := by |
rw [← range_diag, ← image_preimage_eq_range_inter, diag_preimage_prod_self]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.Partition.Filter
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.Partition.Measure
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Compact
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Bool.Lemmas
#align_import analysis.box_integral.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
open scoped Classical Topology NNReal Filter Uniformity BoxIntegral
open Set Finset Function Filter Metric BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams
noncomputable section
namespace BoxIntegral
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type u} {E : Type v} {F : Type w} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] {I J : Box ι} {π : TaggedPrepartition I}
open TaggedPrepartition
local notation "ℝⁿ" => ι → ℝ
def integralSum (f : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F) (π : TaggedPrepartition I) : F :=
∑ J ∈ π.boxes, vol J (f (π.tag J))
#align box_integral.integral_sum BoxIntegral.integralSum
theorem integralSum_biUnionTagged (f : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F) (π : Prepartition I)
(πi : ∀ J, TaggedPrepartition J) :
integralSum f vol (π.biUnionTagged πi) = ∑ J ∈ π.boxes, integralSum f vol (πi J) := by
refine (π.sum_biUnion_boxes _ _).trans <| sum_congr rfl fun J hJ => sum_congr rfl fun J' hJ' => ?_
rw [π.tag_biUnionTagged hJ hJ']
#align box_integral.integral_sum_bUnion_tagged BoxIntegral.integralSum_biUnionTagged
theorem integralSum_biUnion_partition (f : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F)
(π : TaggedPrepartition I) (πi : ∀ J, Prepartition J) (hπi : ∀ J ∈ π, (πi J).IsPartition) :
integralSum f vol (π.biUnionPrepartition πi) = integralSum f vol π := by
refine (π.sum_biUnion_boxes _ _).trans (sum_congr rfl fun J hJ => ?_)
calc
(∑ J' ∈ (πi J).boxes, vol J' (f (π.tag <| π.toPrepartition.biUnionIndex πi J'))) =
∑ J' ∈ (πi J).boxes, vol J' (f (π.tag J)) :=
sum_congr rfl fun J' hJ' => by rw [Prepartition.biUnionIndex_of_mem _ hJ hJ']
_ = vol J (f (π.tag J)) :=
(vol.map ⟨⟨fun g : E →L[ℝ] F => g (f (π.tag J)), rfl⟩, fun _ _ => rfl⟩).sum_partition_boxes
le_top (hπi J hJ)
#align box_integral.integral_sum_bUnion_partition BoxIntegral.integralSum_biUnion_partition
theorem integralSum_inf_partition (f : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F) (π : TaggedPrepartition I)
{π' : Prepartition I} (h : π'.IsPartition) :
integralSum f vol (π.infPrepartition π') = integralSum f vol π :=
integralSum_biUnion_partition f vol π _ fun _J hJ => h.restrict (Prepartition.le_of_mem _ hJ)
#align box_integral.integral_sum_inf_partition BoxIntegral.integralSum_inf_partition
theorem integralSum_fiberwise {α} (g : Box ι → α) (f : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F)
(π : TaggedPrepartition I) :
(∑ y ∈ π.boxes.image g, integralSum f vol (π.filter (g · = y))) = integralSum f vol π :=
π.sum_fiberwise g fun J => vol J (f <| π.tag J)
#align box_integral.integral_sum_fiberwise BoxIntegral.integralSum_fiberwise
theorem integralSum_sub_partitions (f : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F)
{π₁ π₂ : TaggedPrepartition I} (h₁ : π₁.IsPartition) (h₂ : π₂.IsPartition) :
integralSum f vol π₁ - integralSum f vol π₂ =
∑ J ∈ (π₁.toPrepartition ⊓ π₂.toPrepartition).boxes,
(vol J (f <| (π₁.infPrepartition π₂.toPrepartition).tag J) -
vol J (f <| (π₂.infPrepartition π₁.toPrepartition).tag J)) := by
rw [← integralSum_inf_partition f vol π₁ h₂, ← integralSum_inf_partition f vol π₂ h₁,
integralSum, integralSum, Finset.sum_sub_distrib]
simp only [infPrepartition_toPrepartition, inf_comm]
#align box_integral.integral_sum_sub_partitions BoxIntegral.integralSum_sub_partitions
@[simp]
theorem integralSum_disjUnion (f : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F) {π₁ π₂ : TaggedPrepartition I}
(h : Disjoint π₁.iUnion π₂.iUnion) :
integralSum f vol (π₁.disjUnion π₂ h) = integralSum f vol π₁ + integralSum f vol π₂ := by
refine (Prepartition.sum_disj_union_boxes h _).trans
(congr_arg₂ (· + ·) (sum_congr rfl fun J hJ => ?_) (sum_congr rfl fun J hJ => ?_))
· rw [disjUnion_tag_of_mem_left _ hJ]
· rw [disjUnion_tag_of_mem_right _ hJ]
#align box_integral.integral_sum_disj_union BoxIntegral.integralSum_disjUnion
@[simp]
theorem integralSum_add (f g : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F) (π : TaggedPrepartition I) :
integralSum (f + g) vol π = integralSum f vol π + integralSum g vol π := by
simp only [integralSum, Pi.add_apply, (vol _).map_add, Finset.sum_add_distrib]
#align box_integral.integral_sum_add BoxIntegral.integralSum_add
@[simp]
theorem integralSum_neg (f : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F) (π : TaggedPrepartition I) :
integralSum (-f) vol π = -integralSum f vol π := by
simp only [integralSum, Pi.neg_apply, (vol _).map_neg, Finset.sum_neg_distrib]
#align box_integral.integral_sum_neg BoxIntegral.integralSum_neg
@[simp]
theorem integralSum_smul (c : ℝ) (f : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F) (π : TaggedPrepartition I) :
integralSum (c • f) vol π = c • integralSum f vol π := by
simp only [integralSum, Finset.smul_sum, Pi.smul_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.map_smul]
#align box_integral.integral_sum_smul BoxIntegral.integralSum_smul
variable [Fintype ι]
def HasIntegral (I : Box ι) (l : IntegrationParams) (f : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F) (y : F) :
Prop :=
Tendsto (integralSum f vol) (l.toFilteriUnion I ⊤) (𝓝 y)
#align box_integral.has_integral BoxIntegral.HasIntegral
def Integrable (I : Box ι) (l : IntegrationParams) (f : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F) :=
∃ y, HasIntegral I l f vol y
#align box_integral.integrable BoxIntegral.Integrable
def integral (I : Box ι) (l : IntegrationParams) (f : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F) :=
if h : Integrable I l f vol then h.choose else 0
#align box_integral.integral BoxIntegral.integral
-- Porting note: using the above notation ℝⁿ here causes the theorem below to be silently ignored
-- see https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/Lean.204.20doesn't.20add.20lemma.20to.20the.20environment/near/363764522
-- and https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2257
variable {l : IntegrationParams} {f g : (ι → ℝ) → E} {vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F} {y y' : F}
theorem HasIntegral.tendsto (h : HasIntegral I l f vol y) :
Tendsto (integralSum f vol) (l.toFilteriUnion I ⊤) (𝓝 y) :=
h
#align box_integral.has_integral.tendsto BoxIntegral.HasIntegral.tendsto
theorem hasIntegral_iff : HasIntegral I l f vol y ↔
∀ ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃ r : ℝ≥0 → ℝⁿ → Ioi (0 : ℝ), (∀ c, l.RCond (r c)) ∧
∀ c π, l.MemBaseSet I c (r c) π → IsPartition π → dist (integralSum f vol π) y ≤ ε :=
((l.hasBasis_toFilteriUnion_top I).tendsto_iff nhds_basis_closedBall).trans <| by
simp [@forall_swap ℝ≥0 (TaggedPrepartition I)]
#align box_integral.has_integral_iff BoxIntegral.hasIntegral_iff
theorem HasIntegral.of_mul (a : ℝ)
(h : ∀ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε → ∃ r : ℝ≥0 → ℝⁿ → Ioi (0 : ℝ), (∀ c, l.RCond (r c)) ∧ ∀ c π,
l.MemBaseSet I c (r c) π → IsPartition π → dist (integralSum f vol π) y ≤ a * ε) :
HasIntegral I l f vol y := by
refine hasIntegral_iff.2 fun ε hε => ?_
rcases exists_pos_mul_lt hε a with ⟨ε', hε', ha⟩
rcases h ε' hε' with ⟨r, hr, H⟩
exact ⟨r, hr, fun c π hπ hπp => (H c π hπ hπp).trans ha.le⟩
#align box_integral.has_integral_of_mul BoxIntegral.HasIntegral.of_mul
theorem integrable_iff_cauchy [CompleteSpace F] :
Integrable I l f vol ↔ Cauchy ((l.toFilteriUnion I ⊤).map (integralSum f vol)) :=
cauchy_map_iff_exists_tendsto.symm
#align box_integral.integrable_iff_cauchy BoxIntegral.integrable_iff_cauchy
theorem integrable_iff_cauchy_basis [CompleteSpace F] : Integrable I l f vol ↔
∀ ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃ r : ℝ≥0 → ℝⁿ → Ioi (0 : ℝ), (∀ c, l.RCond (r c)) ∧
∀ c₁ c₂ π₁ π₂, l.MemBaseSet I c₁ (r c₁) π₁ → π₁.IsPartition → l.MemBaseSet I c₂ (r c₂) π₂ →
π₂.IsPartition → dist (integralSum f vol π₁) (integralSum f vol π₂) ≤ ε := by
rw [integrable_iff_cauchy, cauchy_map_iff',
(l.hasBasis_toFilteriUnion_top _).prod_self.tendsto_iff uniformity_basis_dist_le]
refine forall₂_congr fun ε _ => exists_congr fun r => ?_
simp only [exists_prop, Prod.forall, Set.mem_iUnion, exists_imp, prod_mk_mem_set_prod_eq, and_imp,
mem_inter_iff, mem_setOf_eq]
exact
and_congr Iff.rfl
⟨fun H c₁ c₂ π₁ π₂ h₁ hU₁ h₂ hU₂ => H π₁ π₂ c₁ h₁ hU₁ c₂ h₂ hU₂,
fun H π₁ π₂ c₁ h₁ hU₁ c₂ h₂ hU₂ => H c₁ c₂ π₁ π₂ h₁ hU₁ h₂ hU₂⟩
#align box_integral.integrable_iff_cauchy_basis BoxIntegral.integrable_iff_cauchy_basis
theorem HasIntegral.mono {l₁ l₂ : IntegrationParams} (h : HasIntegral I l₁ f vol y) (hl : l₂ ≤ l₁) :
HasIntegral I l₂ f vol y :=
h.mono_left <| IntegrationParams.toFilteriUnion_mono _ hl _
#align box_integral.has_integral.mono BoxIntegral.HasIntegral.mono
protected theorem Integrable.hasIntegral (h : Integrable I l f vol) :
HasIntegral I l f vol (integral I l f vol) := by
rw [integral, dif_pos h]
exact Classical.choose_spec h
#align box_integral.integrable.has_integral BoxIntegral.Integrable.hasIntegral
theorem Integrable.mono {l'} (h : Integrable I l f vol) (hle : l' ≤ l) : Integrable I l' f vol :=
⟨_, h.hasIntegral.mono hle⟩
#align box_integral.integrable.mono BoxIntegral.Integrable.mono
theorem HasIntegral.unique (h : HasIntegral I l f vol y) (h' : HasIntegral I l f vol y') : y = y' :=
tendsto_nhds_unique h h'
#align box_integral.has_integral.unique BoxIntegral.HasIntegral.unique
theorem HasIntegral.integrable (h : HasIntegral I l f vol y) : Integrable I l f vol :=
⟨_, h⟩
#align box_integral.has_integral.integrable BoxIntegral.HasIntegral.integrable
theorem HasIntegral.integral_eq (h : HasIntegral I l f vol y) : integral I l f vol = y :=
h.integrable.hasIntegral.unique h
#align box_integral.has_integral.integral_eq BoxIntegral.HasIntegral.integral_eq
nonrec theorem HasIntegral.add (h : HasIntegral I l f vol y) (h' : HasIntegral I l g vol y') :
HasIntegral I l (f + g) vol (y + y') := by
simpa only [HasIntegral, ← integralSum_add] using h.add h'
#align box_integral.has_integral.add BoxIntegral.HasIntegral.add
theorem Integrable.add (hf : Integrable I l f vol) (hg : Integrable I l g vol) :
Integrable I l (f + g) vol :=
(hf.hasIntegral.add hg.hasIntegral).integrable
#align box_integral.integrable.add BoxIntegral.Integrable.add
theorem integral_add (hf : Integrable I l f vol) (hg : Integrable I l g vol) :
integral I l (f + g) vol = integral I l f vol + integral I l g vol :=
(hf.hasIntegral.add hg.hasIntegral).integral_eq
#align box_integral.integral_add BoxIntegral.integral_add
nonrec theorem HasIntegral.neg (hf : HasIntegral I l f vol y) : HasIntegral I l (-f) vol (-y) := by
simpa only [HasIntegral, ← integralSum_neg] using hf.neg
#align box_integral.has_integral.neg BoxIntegral.HasIntegral.neg
theorem Integrable.neg (hf : Integrable I l f vol) : Integrable I l (-f) vol :=
hf.hasIntegral.neg.integrable
#align box_integral.integrable.neg BoxIntegral.Integrable.neg
theorem Integrable.of_neg (hf : Integrable I l (-f) vol) : Integrable I l f vol :=
neg_neg f ▸ hf.neg
#align box_integral.integrable.of_neg BoxIntegral.Integrable.of_neg
@[simp]
theorem integrable_neg : Integrable I l (-f) vol ↔ Integrable I l f vol :=
⟨fun h => h.of_neg, fun h => h.neg⟩
#align box_integral.integrable_neg BoxIntegral.integrable_neg
@[simp]
theorem integral_neg : integral I l (-f) vol = -integral I l f vol :=
if h : Integrable I l f vol then h.hasIntegral.neg.integral_eq
else by rw [integral, integral, dif_neg h, dif_neg (mt Integrable.of_neg h), neg_zero]
#align box_integral.integral_neg BoxIntegral.integral_neg
theorem HasIntegral.sub (h : HasIntegral I l f vol y) (h' : HasIntegral I l g vol y') :
HasIntegral I l (f - g) vol (y - y') := by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h.add h'.neg
#align box_integral.has_integral.sub BoxIntegral.HasIntegral.sub
theorem Integrable.sub (hf : Integrable I l f vol) (hg : Integrable I l g vol) :
Integrable I l (f - g) vol :=
(hf.hasIntegral.sub hg.hasIntegral).integrable
#align box_integral.integrable.sub BoxIntegral.Integrable.sub
theorem integral_sub (hf : Integrable I l f vol) (hg : Integrable I l g vol) :
integral I l (f - g) vol = integral I l f vol - integral I l g vol :=
(hf.hasIntegral.sub hg.hasIntegral).integral_eq
#align box_integral.integral_sub BoxIntegral.integral_sub
theorem hasIntegral_const (c : E) : HasIntegral I l (fun _ => c) vol (vol I c) :=
tendsto_const_nhds.congr' <| (l.eventually_isPartition I).mono fun _π hπ => Eq.symm <|
(vol.map ⟨⟨fun g : E →L[ℝ] F ↦ g c, rfl⟩, fun _ _ ↦ rfl⟩).sum_partition_boxes le_top hπ
#align box_integral.has_integral_const BoxIntegral.hasIntegral_const
@[simp]
theorem integral_const (c : E) : integral I l (fun _ => c) vol = vol I c :=
(hasIntegral_const c).integral_eq
#align box_integral.integral_const BoxIntegral.integral_const
theorem integrable_const (c : E) : Integrable I l (fun _ => c) vol :=
⟨_, hasIntegral_const c⟩
#align box_integral.integrable_const BoxIntegral.integrable_const
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoxIntegral/Basic.lean | 328 | 329 | theorem hasIntegral_zero : HasIntegral I l (fun _ => (0 : E)) vol 0 := by |
simpa only [← (vol I).map_zero] using hasIntegral_const (0 : E)
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Dual
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Basic
open Topology InnerProductSpace Set
noncomputable section
variable {𝕜 F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 F] [CompleteSpace F]
variable {f : F → 𝕜} {f' x : F}
def HasGradientAtFilter (f : F → 𝕜) (f' x : F) (L : Filter F) :=
HasFDerivAtFilter f (toDual 𝕜 F f') x L
def HasGradientWithinAt (f : F → 𝕜) (f' : F) (s : Set F) (x : F) :=
HasGradientAtFilter f f' x (𝓝[s] x)
def HasGradientAt (f : F → 𝕜) (f' x : F) :=
HasGradientAtFilter f f' x (𝓝 x)
def gradientWithin (f : F → 𝕜) (s : Set F) (x : F) : F :=
(toDual 𝕜 F).symm (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x)
def gradient (f : F → 𝕜) (x : F) : F :=
(toDual 𝕜 F).symm (fderiv 𝕜 f x)
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Gradient] notation "∇" => gradient
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
open scoped Gradient
variable {s : Set F} {L : Filter F}
theorem hasGradientWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt {s : Set F} :
HasGradientWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f (toDual 𝕜 F f') s x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_iff_hasGradientWithinAt {frechet : F →L[𝕜] 𝕜} {s : Set F} :
HasFDerivWithinAt f frechet s x ↔ HasGradientWithinAt f ((toDual 𝕜 F).symm frechet) s x := by
rw [hasGradientWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt, (toDual 𝕜 F).apply_symm_apply frechet]
theorem hasGradientAt_iff_hasFDerivAt :
HasGradientAt f f' x ↔ HasFDerivAt f (toDual 𝕜 F f') x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem hasFDerivAt_iff_hasGradientAt {frechet : F →L[𝕜] 𝕜} :
HasFDerivAt f frechet x ↔ HasGradientAt f ((toDual 𝕜 F).symm frechet) x := by
rw [hasGradientAt_iff_hasFDerivAt, (toDual 𝕜 F).apply_symm_apply frechet]
alias ⟨HasGradientWithinAt.hasFDerivWithinAt, _⟩ := hasGradientWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt
alias ⟨HasFDerivWithinAt.hasGradientWithinAt, _⟩ := hasFDerivWithinAt_iff_hasGradientWithinAt
alias ⟨HasGradientAt.hasFDerivAt, _⟩ := hasGradientAt_iff_hasFDerivAt
alias ⟨HasFDerivAt.hasGradientAt, _⟩ := hasFDerivAt_iff_hasGradientAt
theorem gradient_eq_zero_of_not_differentiableAt (h : ¬DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) : ∇ f x = 0 := by
rw [gradient, fderiv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt h, map_zero]
theorem HasGradientAt.unique {gradf gradg : F}
(hf : HasGradientAt f gradf x) (hg : HasGradientAt f gradg x) :
gradf = gradg :=
(toDual 𝕜 F).injective (hf.hasFDerivAt.unique hg.hasFDerivAt)
theorem DifferentiableAt.hasGradientAt (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
HasGradientAt f (∇ f x) x := by
rw [hasGradientAt_iff_hasFDerivAt, gradient, (toDual 𝕜 F).apply_symm_apply (fderiv 𝕜 f x)]
exact h.hasFDerivAt
theorem HasGradientAt.differentiableAt (h : HasGradientAt f f' x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
h.hasFDerivAt.differentiableAt
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.hasGradientWithinAt (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
HasGradientWithinAt f (gradientWithin f s x) s x := by
rw [hasGradientWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt, gradientWithin,
(toDual 𝕜 F).apply_symm_apply (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x)]
exact h.hasFDerivWithinAt
theorem HasGradientWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt (h : HasGradientWithinAt f f' s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
h.hasFDerivWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt
@[simp]
theorem hasGradientWithinAt_univ : HasGradientWithinAt f f' univ x ↔ HasGradientAt f f' x := by
rw [hasGradientWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt, hasGradientAt_iff_hasFDerivAt]
exact hasFDerivWithinAt_univ
theorem DifferentiableOn.hasGradientAt (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasGradientAt f (∇ f x) x :=
(h.hasFDerivAt hs).hasGradientAt
theorem HasGradientAt.gradient (h : HasGradientAt f f' x) : ∇ f x = f' :=
h.differentiableAt.hasGradientAt.unique h
theorem gradient_eq {f' : F → F} (h : ∀ x, HasGradientAt f (f' x) x) : ∇ f = f' :=
funext fun x => (h x).gradient
section OneDimension
variable {g : 𝕜 → 𝕜} {g' u : 𝕜} {L' : Filter 𝕜}
theorem HasGradientAtFilter.hasDerivAtFilter (h : HasGradientAtFilter g g' u L') :
HasDerivAtFilter g (starRingEnd 𝕜 g') u L' := by
have : ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) (starRingEnd 𝕜 g') = (toDual 𝕜 𝕜) g' := by
ext; simp
rwa [HasDerivAtFilter, this]
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.hasGradientAtFilter (h : HasDerivAtFilter g g' u L') :
HasGradientAtFilter g (starRingEnd 𝕜 g') u L' := by
have : ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) g' = (toDual 𝕜 𝕜) (starRingEnd 𝕜 g') := by
ext; simp
rwa [HasGradientAtFilter, ← this]
theorem HasGradientAt.hasDerivAt (h : HasGradientAt g g' u) :
HasDerivAt g (starRingEnd 𝕜 g') u := by
rw [hasGradientAt_iff_hasFDerivAt, hasFDerivAt_iff_hasDerivAt] at h
simpa using h
theorem HasDerivAt.hasGradientAt (h : HasDerivAt g g' u) :
HasGradientAt g (starRingEnd 𝕜 g') u := by
rw [hasGradientAt_iff_hasFDerivAt, hasFDerivAt_iff_hasDerivAt]
simpa
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/Gradient/Basic.lean | 178 | 181 | theorem gradient_eq_deriv : ∇ g u = starRingEnd 𝕜 (deriv g u) := by |
by_cases h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g u
· rw [h.hasGradientAt.hasDerivAt.deriv, RCLike.conj_conj]
· rw [gradient_eq_zero_of_not_differentiableAt h, deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt h, map_zero]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Quaternion
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Algebra
#align_import analysis.quaternion from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"07992a1d1f7a4176c6d3f160209608be4e198566"
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Quaternion] notation "ℍ" => Quaternion ℝ
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
namespace Quaternion
instance : Inner ℝ ℍ :=
⟨fun a b => (a * star b).re⟩
theorem inner_self (a : ℍ) : ⟪a, a⟫ = normSq a :=
rfl
#align quaternion.inner_self Quaternion.inner_self
theorem inner_def (a b : ℍ) : ⟪a, b⟫ = (a * star b).re :=
rfl
#align quaternion.inner_def Quaternion.inner_def
noncomputable instance : NormedAddCommGroup ℍ :=
@InnerProductSpace.Core.toNormedAddCommGroup ℝ ℍ _ _ _
{ toInner := inferInstance
conj_symm := fun x y => by simp [inner_def, mul_comm]
nonneg_re := fun x => normSq_nonneg
definite := fun x => normSq_eq_zero.1
add_left := fun x y z => by simp only [inner_def, add_mul, add_re]
smul_left := fun x y r => by simp [inner_def] }
noncomputable instance : InnerProductSpace ℝ ℍ :=
InnerProductSpace.ofCore _
theorem normSq_eq_norm_mul_self (a : ℍ) : normSq a = ‖a‖ * ‖a‖ := by
rw [← inner_self, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
#align quaternion.norm_sq_eq_norm_sq Quaternion.normSq_eq_norm_mul_self
instance : NormOneClass ℍ :=
⟨by rw [norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner, inner_self, normSq.map_one, Real.sqrt_one]⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem norm_coe (a : ℝ) : ‖(a : ℍ)‖ = ‖a‖ := by
rw [norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner, inner_self, normSq_coe, Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs, Real.norm_eq_abs]
#align quaternion.norm_coe Quaternion.norm_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem nnnorm_coe (a : ℝ) : ‖(a : ℍ)‖₊ = ‖a‖₊ :=
Subtype.ext <| norm_coe a
#align quaternion.nnnorm_coe Quaternion.nnnorm_coe
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note (#10959): simp cannot prove this
theorem norm_star (a : ℍ) : ‖star a‖ = ‖a‖ := by
simp_rw [norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner, inner_self, normSq_star]
#align quaternion.norm_star Quaternion.norm_star
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note (#10959): simp cannot prove this
theorem nnnorm_star (a : ℍ) : ‖star a‖₊ = ‖a‖₊ :=
Subtype.ext <| norm_star a
#align quaternion.nnnorm_star Quaternion.nnnorm_star
noncomputable instance : NormedDivisionRing ℍ where
dist_eq _ _ := rfl
norm_mul' a b := by
simp only [norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner, inner_self, normSq.map_mul]
exact Real.sqrt_mul normSq_nonneg _
-- Porting note: added `noncomputable`
noncomputable instance : NormedAlgebra ℝ ℍ where
norm_smul_le := norm_smul_le
toAlgebra := Quaternion.algebra
instance : CstarRing ℍ where
norm_star_mul_self {x} := (norm_mul _ _).trans <| congr_arg (· * ‖x‖) (norm_star x)
@[coe] def coeComplex (z : ℂ) : ℍ := ⟨z.re, z.im, 0, 0⟩
instance : Coe ℂ ℍ := ⟨coeComplex⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coeComplex_re (z : ℂ) : (z : ℍ).re = z.re :=
rfl
#align quaternion.coe_complex_re Quaternion.coeComplex_re
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coeComplex_imI (z : ℂ) : (z : ℍ).imI = z.im :=
rfl
#align quaternion.coe_complex_im_i Quaternion.coeComplex_imI
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coeComplex_imJ (z : ℂ) : (z : ℍ).imJ = 0 :=
rfl
#align quaternion.coe_complex_im_j Quaternion.coeComplex_imJ
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coeComplex_imK (z : ℂ) : (z : ℍ).imK = 0 :=
rfl
#align quaternion.coe_complex_im_k Quaternion.coeComplex_imK
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coeComplex_add (z w : ℂ) : ↑(z + w) = (z + w : ℍ) := by ext <;> simp
#align quaternion.coe_complex_add Quaternion.coeComplex_add
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coeComplex_mul (z w : ℂ) : ↑(z * w) = (z * w : ℍ) := by ext <;> simp
#align quaternion.coe_complex_mul Quaternion.coeComplex_mul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coeComplex_zero : ((0 : ℂ) : ℍ) = 0 :=
rfl
#align quaternion.coe_complex_zero Quaternion.coeComplex_zero
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coeComplex_one : ((1 : ℂ) : ℍ) = 1 :=
rfl
#align quaternion.coe_complex_one Quaternion.coeComplex_one
@[simp, norm_cast, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note (#10959): simp cannot prove this
theorem coe_real_complex_mul (r : ℝ) (z : ℂ) : (r • z : ℍ) = ↑r * ↑z := by ext <;> simp
#align quaternion.coe_real_complex_mul Quaternion.coe_real_complex_mul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coeComplex_coe (r : ℝ) : ((r : ℂ) : ℍ) = r :=
rfl
#align quaternion.coe_complex_coe Quaternion.coeComplex_coe
def ofComplex : ℂ →ₐ[ℝ] ℍ where
toFun := (↑)
map_one' := rfl
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' := coeComplex_add
map_mul' := coeComplex_mul
commutes' _ := rfl
#align quaternion.of_complex Quaternion.ofComplex
@[simp]
theorem coe_ofComplex : ⇑ofComplex = coeComplex := rfl
#align quaternion.coe_of_complex Quaternion.coe_ofComplex
theorem norm_piLp_equiv_symm_equivTuple (x : ℍ) :
‖(WithLp.equiv 2 (Fin 4 → _)).symm (equivTuple ℝ x)‖ = ‖x‖ := by
rw [norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner, norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner, inner_self, normSq_def', PiLp.inner_apply,
Fin.sum_univ_four]
simp_rw [RCLike.inner_apply, starRingEnd_apply, star_trivial, ← sq]
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align quaternion.norm_pi_Lp_equiv_symm_equiv_tuple Quaternion.norm_piLp_equiv_symm_equivTuple
@[simps apply symm_apply]
noncomputable def linearIsometryEquivTuple : ℍ ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin 4) :=
{ (QuaternionAlgebra.linearEquivTuple (-1 : ℝ) (-1 : ℝ)).trans
(WithLp.linearEquiv 2 ℝ (Fin 4 → ℝ)).symm with
toFun := fun a => (WithLp.equiv _ (Fin 4 → _)).symm ![a.1, a.2, a.3, a.4]
invFun := fun a => ⟨a 0, a 1, a 2, a 3⟩
norm_map' := norm_piLp_equiv_symm_equivTuple }
#align quaternion.linear_isometry_equiv_tuple Quaternion.linearIsometryEquivTuple
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous (coe : ℝ → ℍ) :=
continuous_algebraMap ℝ ℍ
#align quaternion.continuous_coe Quaternion.continuous_coe
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_normSq : Continuous (normSq : ℍ → ℝ) := by
simpa [← normSq_eq_norm_mul_self] using
(continuous_norm.mul continuous_norm : Continuous fun q : ℍ => ‖q‖ * ‖q‖)
#align quaternion.continuous_norm_sq Quaternion.continuous_normSq
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_re : Continuous fun q : ℍ => q.re :=
(continuous_apply 0).comp linearIsometryEquivTuple.continuous
#align quaternion.continuous_re Quaternion.continuous_re
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_imI : Continuous fun q : ℍ => q.imI :=
(continuous_apply 1).comp linearIsometryEquivTuple.continuous
#align quaternion.continuous_im_i Quaternion.continuous_imI
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_imJ : Continuous fun q : ℍ => q.imJ :=
(continuous_apply 2).comp linearIsometryEquivTuple.continuous
#align quaternion.continuous_im_j Quaternion.continuous_imJ
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_imK : Continuous fun q : ℍ => q.imK :=
(continuous_apply 3).comp linearIsometryEquivTuple.continuous
#align quaternion.continuous_im_k Quaternion.continuous_imK
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_im : Continuous fun q : ℍ => q.im := by
simpa only [← sub_self_re] using continuous_id.sub (continuous_coe.comp continuous_re)
#align quaternion.continuous_im Quaternion.continuous_im
instance : CompleteSpace ℍ :=
haveI : UniformEmbedding linearIsometryEquivTuple.toLinearEquiv.toEquiv.symm :=
linearIsometryEquivTuple.toContinuousLinearEquiv.symm.uniformEmbedding
(completeSpace_congr this).1 (by infer_instance)
section infinite_sum
variable {α : Type*}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem hasSum_coe {f : α → ℝ} {r : ℝ} : HasSum (fun a => (f a : ℍ)) (↑r : ℍ) ↔ HasSum f r :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only using h.map (show ℍ →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ from QuaternionAlgebra.reₗ _ _) continuous_re,
fun h => by simpa only using h.map (algebraMap ℝ ℍ) (continuous_algebraMap _ _)⟩
#align quaternion.has_sum_coe Quaternion.hasSum_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem summable_coe {f : α → ℝ} : (Summable fun a => (f a : ℍ)) ↔ Summable f := by
simpa only using
Summable.map_iff_of_leftInverse (algebraMap ℝ ℍ) (show ℍ →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ from QuaternionAlgebra.reₗ _ _)
(continuous_algebraMap _ _) continuous_re coe_re
#align quaternion.summable_coe Quaternion.summable_coe
@[norm_cast]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Quaternion.lean | 251 | 254 | theorem tsum_coe (f : α → ℝ) : (∑' a, (f a : ℍ)) = ↑(∑' a, f a) := by |
by_cases hf : Summable f
· exact (hasSum_coe.mpr hf.hasSum).tsum_eq
· simp [tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable hf, tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable (summable_coe.not.mpr hf)]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Unitary
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.ModEq
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Zsqrtd.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity
#align_import number_theory.pell_matiyasevic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"795b501869b9fa7aa716d5fdadd00c03f983a605"
namespace Pell
open Nat
section
variable {d : ℤ}
def IsPell : ℤ√d → Prop
| ⟨x, y⟩ => x * x - d * y * y = 1
#align pell.is_pell Pell.IsPell
theorem isPell_norm : ∀ {b : ℤ√d}, IsPell b ↔ b * star b = 1
| ⟨x, y⟩ => by simp [Zsqrtd.ext_iff, IsPell, mul_comm]; ring_nf
#align pell.is_pell_norm Pell.isPell_norm
theorem isPell_iff_mem_unitary : ∀ {b : ℤ√d}, IsPell b ↔ b ∈ unitary (ℤ√d)
| ⟨x, y⟩ => by rw [unitary.mem_iff, isPell_norm, mul_comm (star _), and_self_iff]
#align pell.is_pell_iff_mem_unitary Pell.isPell_iff_mem_unitary
theorem isPell_mul {b c : ℤ√d} (hb : IsPell b) (hc : IsPell c) : IsPell (b * c) :=
isPell_norm.2 (by simp [mul_comm, mul_left_comm c, mul_assoc,
star_mul, isPell_norm.1 hb, isPell_norm.1 hc])
#align pell.is_pell_mul Pell.isPell_mul
theorem isPell_star : ∀ {b : ℤ√d}, IsPell b ↔ IsPell (star b)
| ⟨x, y⟩ => by simp [IsPell, Zsqrtd.star_mk]
#align pell.is_pell_star Pell.isPell_star
end
section
-- Porting note: was parameter in Lean3
variable {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a)
private def d (_a1 : 1 < a) :=
a * a - 1
@[simp]
theorem d_pos : 0 < d a1 :=
tsub_pos_of_lt (mul_lt_mul a1 (le_of_lt a1) (by decide) (Nat.zero_le _) : 1 * 1 < a * a)
#align pell.d_pos Pell.d_pos
-- TODO(lint): Fix double namespace issue
--@[nolint dup_namespace]
def pell : ℕ → ℕ × ℕ
-- Porting note: used pattern matching because `Nat.recOn` is noncomputable
| 0 => (1, 0)
| n+1 => ((pell n).1 * a + d a1 * (pell n).2, (pell n).1 + (pell n).2 * a)
#align pell.pell Pell.pell
def xn (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
(pell a1 n).1
#align pell.xn Pell.xn
def yn (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
(pell a1 n).2
#align pell.yn Pell.yn
@[simp]
theorem pell_val (n : ℕ) : pell a1 n = (xn a1 n, yn a1 n) :=
show pell a1 n = ((pell a1 n).1, (pell a1 n).2) from
match pell a1 n with
| (_, _) => rfl
#align pell.pell_val Pell.pell_val
@[simp]
theorem xn_zero : xn a1 0 = 1 :=
rfl
#align pell.xn_zero Pell.xn_zero
@[simp]
theorem yn_zero : yn a1 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align pell.yn_zero Pell.yn_zero
@[simp]
theorem xn_succ (n : ℕ) : xn a1 (n + 1) = xn a1 n * a + d a1 * yn a1 n :=
rfl
#align pell.xn_succ Pell.xn_succ
@[simp]
theorem yn_succ (n : ℕ) : yn a1 (n + 1) = xn a1 n + yn a1 n * a :=
rfl
#align pell.yn_succ Pell.yn_succ
--@[simp] Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove it
theorem xn_one : xn a1 1 = a := by simp
#align pell.xn_one Pell.xn_one
--@[simp] Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove it
theorem yn_one : yn a1 1 = 1 := by simp
#align pell.yn_one Pell.yn_one
def xz (n : ℕ) : ℤ :=
xn a1 n
#align pell.xz Pell.xz
def yz (n : ℕ) : ℤ :=
yn a1 n
#align pell.yz Pell.yz
section
def az (a : ℕ) : ℤ :=
a
#align pell.az Pell.az
end
theorem asq_pos : 0 < a * a :=
le_trans (le_of_lt a1)
(by have := @Nat.mul_le_mul_left 1 a a (le_of_lt a1); rwa [mul_one] at this)
#align pell.asq_pos Pell.asq_pos
theorem dz_val : ↑(d a1) = az a * az a - 1 :=
have : 1 ≤ a * a := asq_pos a1
by rw [Pell.d, Int.ofNat_sub this]; rfl
#align pell.dz_val Pell.dz_val
@[simp]
theorem xz_succ (n : ℕ) : (xz a1 (n + 1)) = xz a1 n * az a + d a1 * yz a1 n :=
rfl
#align pell.xz_succ Pell.xz_succ
@[simp]
theorem yz_succ (n : ℕ) : yz a1 (n + 1) = xz a1 n + yz a1 n * az a :=
rfl
#align pell.yz_succ Pell.yz_succ
def pellZd (n : ℕ) : ℤ√(d a1) :=
⟨xn a1 n, yn a1 n⟩
#align pell.pell_zd Pell.pellZd
@[simp]
theorem pellZd_re (n : ℕ) : (pellZd a1 n).re = xn a1 n :=
rfl
#align pell.pell_zd_re Pell.pellZd_re
@[simp]
theorem pellZd_im (n : ℕ) : (pellZd a1 n).im = yn a1 n :=
rfl
#align pell.pell_zd_im Pell.pellZd_im
theorem isPell_nat {x y : ℕ} : IsPell (⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) ↔ x * x - d a1 * y * y = 1 :=
⟨fun h =>
Nat.cast_inj.1
(by rw [Int.ofNat_sub (Int.le_of_ofNat_le_ofNat <| Int.le.intro_sub _ h)]; exact h),
fun h =>
show ((x * x : ℕ) - (d a1 * y * y : ℕ) : ℤ) = 1 by
rw [← Int.ofNat_sub <| le_of_lt <| Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ h, h]; rfl⟩
#align pell.is_pell_nat Pell.isPell_nat
@[simp]
theorem pellZd_succ (n : ℕ) : pellZd a1 (n + 1) = pellZd a1 n * ⟨a, 1⟩ := by ext <;> simp
#align pell.pell_zd_succ Pell.pellZd_succ
theorem isPell_one : IsPell (⟨a, 1⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) :=
show az a * az a - d a1 * 1 * 1 = 1 by simp [dz_val]
#align pell.is_pell_one Pell.isPell_one
theorem isPell_pellZd : ∀ n : ℕ, IsPell (pellZd a1 n)
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by
let o := isPell_one a1
simp; exact Pell.isPell_mul (isPell_pellZd n) o
#align pell.is_pell_pell_zd Pell.isPell_pellZd
@[simp]
theorem pell_eqz (n : ℕ) : xz a1 n * xz a1 n - d a1 * yz a1 n * yz a1 n = 1 :=
isPell_pellZd a1 n
#align pell.pell_eqz Pell.pell_eqz
@[simp]
theorem pell_eq (n : ℕ) : xn a1 n * xn a1 n - d a1 * yn a1 n * yn a1 n = 1 :=
let pn := pell_eqz a1 n
have h : (↑(xn a1 n * xn a1 n) : ℤ) - ↑(d a1 * yn a1 n * yn a1 n) = 1 := by
repeat' rw [Int.ofNat_mul]; exact pn
have hl : d a1 * yn a1 n * yn a1 n ≤ xn a1 n * xn a1 n :=
Nat.cast_le.1 <| Int.le.intro _ <| add_eq_of_eq_sub' <| Eq.symm h
Nat.cast_inj.1 (by rw [Int.ofNat_sub hl]; exact h)
#align pell.pell_eq Pell.pell_eq
instance dnsq : Zsqrtd.Nonsquare (d a1) :=
⟨fun n h =>
have : n * n + 1 = a * a := by rw [← h]; exact Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (asq_pos a1)
have na : n < a := Nat.mul_self_lt_mul_self_iff.1 (by rw [← this]; exact Nat.lt_succ_self _)
have : (n + 1) * (n + 1) ≤ n * n + 1 := by rw [this]; exact Nat.mul_self_le_mul_self na
have : n + n ≤ 0 :=
@Nat.le_of_add_le_add_right _ (n * n + 1) _ (by ring_nf at this ⊢; assumption)
Nat.ne_of_gt (d_pos a1) <| by
rwa [Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero ((Nat.le_add_left _ _).trans this)] at h⟩
#align pell.dnsq Pell.dnsq
theorem xn_ge_a_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, a ^ n ≤ xn a1 n
| 0 => le_refl 1
| n + 1 => by
simp only [_root_.pow_succ, xn_succ]
exact le_trans (Nat.mul_le_mul_right _ (xn_ge_a_pow n)) (Nat.le_add_right _ _)
#align pell.xn_ge_a_pow Pell.xn_ge_a_pow
theorem n_lt_a_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, n < a ^ n
| 0 => Nat.le_refl 1
| n + 1 => by
have IH := n_lt_a_pow n
have : a ^ n + a ^ n ≤ a ^ n * a := by
rw [← mul_two]
exact Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ a1
simp only [_root_.pow_succ, gt_iff_lt]
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ this
exact add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le IH (lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _) IH)
#align pell.n_lt_a_pow Pell.n_lt_a_pow
theorem n_lt_xn (n) : n < xn a1 n :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (n_lt_a_pow a1 n) (xn_ge_a_pow a1 n)
#align pell.n_lt_xn Pell.n_lt_xn
theorem x_pos (n) : 0 < xn a1 n :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le n) (n_lt_xn a1 n)
#align pell.x_pos Pell.x_pos
theorem eq_pell_lem : ∀ (n) (b : ℤ√(d a1)), 1 ≤ b → IsPell b →
b ≤ pellZd a1 n → ∃ n, b = pellZd a1 n
| 0, b => fun h1 _ hl => ⟨0, @Zsqrtd.le_antisymm _ (dnsq a1) _ _ hl h1⟩
| n + 1, b => fun h1 hp h =>
have a1p : (0 : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ ⟨a, 1⟩ := trivial
have am1p : (0 : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ ⟨a, -1⟩ := show (_ : Nat) ≤ _ by simp; exact Nat.pred_le _
have a1m : (⟨a, 1⟩ * ⟨a, -1⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) = 1 := isPell_norm.1 (isPell_one a1)
if ha : (⟨↑a, 1⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ b then
let ⟨m, e⟩ :=
eq_pell_lem n (b * ⟨a, -1⟩) (by rw [← a1m]; exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ha am1p)
(isPell_mul hp (isPell_star.1 (isPell_one a1)))
(by
have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h am1p
rwa [pellZd_succ, mul_assoc, a1m, mul_one] at t)
⟨m + 1, by
rw [show b = b * ⟨a, -1⟩ * ⟨a, 1⟩ by rw [mul_assoc, Eq.trans (mul_comm _ _) a1m]; simp,
pellZd_succ, e]⟩
else
suffices ¬1 < b from ⟨0, show b = 1 from (Or.resolve_left (lt_or_eq_of_le h1) this).symm⟩
fun h1l => by
cases' b with x y
exact by
have bm : (_ * ⟨_, _⟩ : ℤ√d a1) = 1 := Pell.isPell_norm.1 hp
have y0l : (0 : ℤ√d a1) < ⟨x - x, y - -y⟩ :=
sub_lt_sub h1l fun hn : (1 : ℤ√d a1) ≤ ⟨x, -y⟩ => by
have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hn (le_trans zero_le_one h1)
erw [bm, mul_one] at t
exact h1l t
have yl2 : (⟨_, _⟩ : ℤ√_) < ⟨_, _⟩ :=
show (⟨x, y⟩ - ⟨x, -y⟩ : ℤ√d a1) < ⟨a, 1⟩ - ⟨a, -1⟩ from
sub_lt_sub ha fun hn : (⟨x, -y⟩ : ℤ√d a1) ≤ ⟨a, -1⟩ => by
have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hn (le_trans zero_le_one h1)) a1p
erw [bm, one_mul, mul_assoc, Eq.trans (mul_comm _ _) a1m, mul_one] at t
exact ha t
simp only [sub_self, sub_neg_eq_add] at y0l; simp only [Zsqrtd.neg_re, add_right_neg,
Zsqrtd.neg_im, neg_neg] at yl2
exact
match y, y0l, (yl2 : (⟨_, _⟩ : ℤ√_) < ⟨_, _⟩) with
| 0, y0l, _ => y0l (le_refl 0)
| (y + 1 : ℕ), _, yl2 =>
yl2
(Zsqrtd.le_of_le_le (by simp [sub_eq_add_neg])
(let t := Int.ofNat_le_ofNat_of_le (Nat.succ_pos y)
add_le_add t t))
| Int.negSucc _, y0l, _ => y0l trivial
#align pell.eq_pell_lem Pell.eq_pell_lem
theorem eq_pellZd (b : ℤ√(d a1)) (b1 : 1 ≤ b) (hp : IsPell b) : ∃ n, b = pellZd a1 n :=
let ⟨n, h⟩ := @Zsqrtd.le_arch (d a1) b
eq_pell_lem a1 n b b1 hp <|
h.trans <| by
rw [Zsqrtd.natCast_val]
exact
Zsqrtd.le_of_le_le (Int.ofNat_le_ofNat_of_le <| le_of_lt <| n_lt_xn _ _)
(Int.ofNat_zero_le _)
#align pell.eq_pell_zd Pell.eq_pellZd
theorem eq_pell {x y : ℕ} (hp : x * x - d a1 * y * y = 1) : ∃ n, x = xn a1 n ∧ y = yn a1 n :=
have : (1 : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ ⟨x, y⟩ :=
match x, hp with
| 0, (hp : 0 - _ = 1) => by rw [zero_tsub] at hp; contradiction
| x + 1, _hp =>
Zsqrtd.le_of_le_le (Int.ofNat_le_ofNat_of_le <| Nat.succ_pos x) (Int.ofNat_zero_le _)
let ⟨m, e⟩ := eq_pellZd a1 ⟨x, y⟩ this ((isPell_nat a1).2 hp)
⟨m,
match x, y, e with
| _, _, rfl => ⟨rfl, rfl⟩⟩
#align pell.eq_pell Pell.eq_pell
theorem pellZd_add (m) : ∀ n, pellZd a1 (m + n) = pellZd a1 m * pellZd a1 n
| 0 => (mul_one _).symm
| n + 1 => by rw [← add_assoc, pellZd_succ, pellZd_succ, pellZd_add _ n, ← mul_assoc]
#align pell.pell_zd_add Pell.pellZd_add
theorem xn_add (m n) : xn a1 (m + n) = xn a1 m * xn a1 n + d a1 * yn a1 m * yn a1 n := by
injection pellZd_add a1 m n with h _
zify
rw [h]
simp [pellZd]
#align pell.xn_add Pell.xn_add
theorem yn_add (m n) : yn a1 (m + n) = xn a1 m * yn a1 n + yn a1 m * xn a1 n := by
injection pellZd_add a1 m n with _ h
zify
rw [h]
simp [pellZd]
#align pell.yn_add Pell.yn_add
theorem pellZd_sub {m n} (h : n ≤ m) : pellZd a1 (m - n) = pellZd a1 m * star (pellZd a1 n) := by
let t := pellZd_add a1 n (m - n)
rw [add_tsub_cancel_of_le h] at t
rw [t, mul_comm (pellZd _ n) _, mul_assoc, isPell_norm.1 (isPell_pellZd _ _), mul_one]
#align pell.pell_zd_sub Pell.pellZd_sub
theorem xz_sub {m n} (h : n ≤ m) :
xz a1 (m - n) = xz a1 m * xz a1 n - d a1 * yz a1 m * yz a1 n := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← mul_neg]
exact congr_arg Zsqrtd.re (pellZd_sub a1 h)
#align pell.xz_sub Pell.xz_sub
theorem yz_sub {m n} (h : n ≤ m) : yz a1 (m - n) = xz a1 n * yz a1 m - xz a1 m * yz a1 n := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← mul_neg, mul_comm, add_comm]
exact congr_arg Zsqrtd.im (pellZd_sub a1 h)
#align pell.yz_sub Pell.yz_sub
theorem xy_coprime (n) : (xn a1 n).Coprime (yn a1 n) :=
Nat.coprime_of_dvd' fun k _ kx ky => by
let p := pell_eq a1 n
rw [← p]
exact Nat.dvd_sub (le_of_lt <| Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ p) (kx.mul_left _) (ky.mul_left _)
#align pell.xy_coprime Pell.xy_coprime
theorem strictMono_y : StrictMono (yn a1)
| m, 0, h => absurd h <| Nat.not_lt_zero _
| m, n + 1, h => by
have : yn a1 m ≤ yn a1 n :=
Or.elim (lt_or_eq_of_le <| Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h) (fun hl => le_of_lt <| strictMono_y hl)
fun e => by rw [e]
simp; refine lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ (Nat.lt_add_of_pos_left <| x_pos a1 n)
rw [← mul_one (yn a1 m)]
exact mul_le_mul this (le_of_lt a1) (Nat.zero_le _) (Nat.zero_le _)
#align pell.strict_mono_y Pell.strictMono_y
theorem strictMono_x : StrictMono (xn a1)
| m, 0, h => absurd h <| Nat.not_lt_zero _
| m, n + 1, h => by
have : xn a1 m ≤ xn a1 n :=
Or.elim (lt_or_eq_of_le <| Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h) (fun hl => le_of_lt <| strictMono_x hl)
fun e => by rw [e]
simp; refine lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_of_le_of_lt this ?_) (Nat.le_add_right _ _)
have t := Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left a1 (x_pos a1 n)
rwa [mul_one] at t
#align pell.strict_mono_x Pell.strictMono_x
theorem yn_ge_n : ∀ n, n ≤ yn a1 n
| 0 => Nat.zero_le _
| n + 1 =>
show n < yn a1 (n + 1) from lt_of_le_of_lt (yn_ge_n n) (strictMono_y a1 <| Nat.lt_succ_self n)
#align pell.yn_ge_n Pell.yn_ge_n
theorem y_mul_dvd (n) : ∀ k, yn a1 n ∣ yn a1 (n * k)
| 0 => dvd_zero _
| k + 1 => by
rw [Nat.mul_succ, yn_add]; exact dvd_add (dvd_mul_left _ _) ((y_mul_dvd _ k).mul_right _)
#align pell.y_mul_dvd Pell.y_mul_dvd
theorem y_dvd_iff (m n) : yn a1 m ∣ yn a1 n ↔ m ∣ n :=
⟨fun h =>
Nat.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero <|
(Nat.eq_zero_or_pos _).resolve_right fun hp => by
have co : Nat.Coprime (yn a1 m) (xn a1 (m * (n / m))) :=
Nat.Coprime.symm <| (xy_coprime a1 _).coprime_dvd_right (y_mul_dvd a1 m (n / m))
have m0 : 0 < m :=
m.eq_zero_or_pos.resolve_left fun e => by
rw [e, Nat.mod_zero] at hp;rw [e] at h
exact _root_.ne_of_lt (strictMono_y a1 hp) (eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h).symm
rw [← Nat.mod_add_div n m, yn_add] at h
exact
not_le_of_gt (strictMono_y _ <| Nat.mod_lt n m0)
(Nat.le_of_dvd (strictMono_y _ hp) <|
co.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right <|
(Nat.dvd_add_iff_right <| (y_mul_dvd _ _ _).mul_left _).2 h),
fun ⟨k, e⟩ => by rw [e]; apply y_mul_dvd⟩
#align pell.y_dvd_iff Pell.y_dvd_iff
theorem xy_modEq_yn (n) :
∀ k, xn a1 (n * k) ≡ xn a1 n ^ k [MOD yn a1 n ^ 2] ∧ yn a1 (n * k) ≡
k * xn a1 n ^ (k - 1) * yn a1 n [MOD yn a1 n ^ 3]
| 0 => by constructor <;> simp <;> exact Nat.ModEq.refl _
| k + 1 => by
let ⟨hx, hy⟩ := xy_modEq_yn n k
have L : xn a1 (n * k) * xn a1 n + d a1 * yn a1 (n * k) * yn a1 n ≡
xn a1 n ^ k * xn a1 n + 0 [MOD yn a1 n ^ 2] :=
(hx.mul_right _).add <|
modEq_zero_iff_dvd.2 <| by
rw [_root_.pow_succ]
exact
mul_dvd_mul_right
(dvd_mul_of_dvd_right
(modEq_zero_iff_dvd.1 <|
(hy.of_dvd <| by simp [_root_.pow_succ]).trans <|
modEq_zero_iff_dvd.2 <| by simp)
_) _
have R : xn a1 (n * k) * yn a1 n + yn a1 (n * k) * xn a1 n ≡
xn a1 n ^ k * yn a1 n + k * xn a1 n ^ k * yn a1 n [MOD yn a1 n ^ 3] :=
ModEq.add
(by
rw [_root_.pow_succ]
exact hx.mul_right' _) <| by
have : k * xn a1 n ^ (k - 1) * yn a1 n * xn a1 n = k * xn a1 n ^ k * yn a1 n := by
cases' k with k <;> simp [_root_.pow_succ]; ring_nf
rw [← this]
exact hy.mul_right _
rw [add_tsub_cancel_right, Nat.mul_succ, xn_add, yn_add, pow_succ (xn _ n), Nat.succ_mul,
add_comm (k * xn _ n ^ k) (xn _ n ^ k), right_distrib]
exact ⟨L, R⟩
#align pell.xy_modeq_yn Pell.xy_modEq_yn
theorem ysq_dvd_yy (n) : yn a1 n * yn a1 n ∣ yn a1 (n * yn a1 n) :=
modEq_zero_iff_dvd.1 <|
((xy_modEq_yn a1 n (yn a1 n)).right.of_dvd <| by simp [_root_.pow_succ]).trans
(modEq_zero_iff_dvd.2 <| by simp [mul_dvd_mul_left, mul_assoc])
#align pell.ysq_dvd_yy Pell.ysq_dvd_yy
theorem dvd_of_ysq_dvd {n t} (h : yn a1 n * yn a1 n ∣ yn a1 t) : yn a1 n ∣ t :=
have nt : n ∣ t := (y_dvd_iff a1 n t).1 <| dvd_of_mul_left_dvd h
n.eq_zero_or_pos.elim (fun n0 => by rwa [n0] at nt ⊢) fun n0l : 0 < n => by
let ⟨k, ke⟩ := nt
have : yn a1 n ∣ k * xn a1 n ^ (k - 1) :=
Nat.dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_right (strictMono_y a1 n0l) <|
modEq_zero_iff_dvd.1 <| by
have xm := (xy_modEq_yn a1 n k).right; rw [← ke] at xm
exact (xm.of_dvd <| by simp [_root_.pow_succ]).symm.trans h.modEq_zero_nat
rw [ke]
exact dvd_mul_of_dvd_right (((xy_coprime _ _).pow_left _).symm.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right this) _
#align pell.dvd_of_ysq_dvd Pell.dvd_of_ysq_dvd
theorem pellZd_succ_succ (n) :
pellZd a1 (n + 2) + pellZd a1 n = (2 * a : ℕ) * pellZd a1 (n + 1) := by
have : (1 : ℤ√(d a1)) + ⟨a, 1⟩ * ⟨a, 1⟩ = ⟨a, 1⟩ * (2 * a) := by
rw [Zsqrtd.natCast_val]
change (⟨_, _⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) = ⟨_, _⟩
rw [dz_val]
dsimp [az]
ext <;> dsimp <;> ring_nf
simpa [mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, add_comm] using congr_arg (· * pellZd a1 n) this
#align pell.pell_zd_succ_succ Pell.pellZd_succ_succ
theorem xy_succ_succ (n) :
xn a1 (n + 2) + xn a1 n =
2 * a * xn a1 (n + 1) ∧ yn a1 (n + 2) + yn a1 n = 2 * a * yn a1 (n + 1) := by
have := pellZd_succ_succ a1 n; unfold pellZd at this
erw [Zsqrtd.smul_val (2 * a : ℕ)] at this
injection this with h₁ h₂
constructor <;> apply Int.ofNat.inj <;> [simpa using h₁; simpa using h₂]
#align pell.xy_succ_succ Pell.xy_succ_succ
theorem xn_succ_succ (n) : xn a1 (n + 2) + xn a1 n = 2 * a * xn a1 (n + 1) :=
(xy_succ_succ a1 n).1
#align pell.xn_succ_succ Pell.xn_succ_succ
theorem yn_succ_succ (n) : yn a1 (n + 2) + yn a1 n = 2 * a * yn a1 (n + 1) :=
(xy_succ_succ a1 n).2
#align pell.yn_succ_succ Pell.yn_succ_succ
theorem xz_succ_succ (n) : xz a1 (n + 2) = (2 * a : ℕ) * xz a1 (n + 1) - xz a1 n :=
eq_sub_of_add_eq <| by delta xz; rw [← Int.ofNat_add, ← Int.ofNat_mul, xn_succ_succ]
#align pell.xz_succ_succ Pell.xz_succ_succ
theorem yz_succ_succ (n) : yz a1 (n + 2) = (2 * a : ℕ) * yz a1 (n + 1) - yz a1 n :=
eq_sub_of_add_eq <| by delta yz; rw [← Int.ofNat_add, ← Int.ofNat_mul, yn_succ_succ]
#align pell.yz_succ_succ Pell.yz_succ_succ
theorem yn_modEq_a_sub_one : ∀ n, yn a1 n ≡ n [MOD a - 1]
| 0 => by simp [Nat.ModEq.refl]
| 1 => by simp [Nat.ModEq.refl]
| n + 2 =>
(yn_modEq_a_sub_one n).add_right_cancel <| by
rw [yn_succ_succ, (by ring : n + 2 + n = 2 * (n + 1))]
exact ((modEq_sub a1.le).mul_left 2).mul (yn_modEq_a_sub_one (n + 1))
#align pell.yn_modeq_a_sub_one Pell.yn_modEq_a_sub_one
theorem yn_modEq_two : ∀ n, yn a1 n ≡ n [MOD 2]
| 0 => by rfl
| 1 => by simp; rfl
| n + 2 =>
(yn_modEq_two n).add_right_cancel <| by
rw [yn_succ_succ, mul_assoc, (by ring : n + 2 + n = 2 * (n + 1))]
exact (dvd_mul_right 2 _).modEq_zero_nat.trans (dvd_mul_right 2 _).zero_modEq_nat
#align pell.yn_modeq_two Pell.yn_modEq_two
section
theorem x_sub_y_dvd_pow_lem (y2 y1 y0 yn1 yn0 xn1 xn0 ay a2 : ℤ) :
(a2 * yn1 - yn0) * ay + y2 - (a2 * xn1 - xn0) =
y2 - a2 * y1 + y0 + a2 * (yn1 * ay + y1 - xn1) - (yn0 * ay + y0 - xn0) := by
ring
#align pell.x_sub_y_dvd_pow_lem Pell.x_sub_y_dvd_pow_lem
end
theorem x_sub_y_dvd_pow (y : ℕ) :
∀ n, (2 * a * y - y * y - 1 : ℤ) ∣ yz a1 n * (a - y) + ↑(y ^ n) - xz a1 n
| 0 => by simp [xz, yz, Int.ofNat_zero, Int.ofNat_one]
| 1 => by simp [xz, yz, Int.ofNat_zero, Int.ofNat_one]
| n + 2 => by
have : (2 * a * y - y * y - 1 : ℤ) ∣ ↑(y ^ (n + 2)) - ↑(2 * a) * ↑(y ^ (n + 1)) + ↑(y ^ n) :=
⟨-↑(y ^ n), by
simp [_root_.pow_succ, mul_add, Int.ofNat_mul, show ((2 : ℕ) : ℤ) = 2 from rfl, mul_comm,
mul_left_comm]
ring⟩
rw [xz_succ_succ, yz_succ_succ, x_sub_y_dvd_pow_lem ↑(y ^ (n + 2)) ↑(y ^ (n + 1)) ↑(y ^ n)]
exact _root_.dvd_sub (dvd_add this <| (x_sub_y_dvd_pow _ (n + 1)).mul_left _)
(x_sub_y_dvd_pow _ n)
#align pell.x_sub_y_dvd_pow Pell.x_sub_y_dvd_pow
theorem xn_modEq_x2n_add_lem (n j) : xn a1 n ∣ d a1 * yn a1 n * (yn a1 n * xn a1 j) + xn a1 j := by
have h1 : d a1 * yn a1 n * (yn a1 n * xn a1 j) + xn a1 j =
(d a1 * yn a1 n * yn a1 n + 1) * xn a1 j := by
simp [add_mul, mul_assoc]
have h2 : d a1 * yn a1 n * yn a1 n + 1 = xn a1 n * xn a1 n := by
zify at *
apply add_eq_of_eq_sub' (Eq.symm (pell_eqz a1 n))
rw [h2] at h1; rw [h1, mul_assoc]; exact dvd_mul_right _ _
#align pell.xn_modeq_x2n_add_lem Pell.xn_modEq_x2n_add_lem
theorem xn_modEq_x2n_add (n j) : xn a1 (2 * n + j) + xn a1 j ≡ 0 [MOD xn a1 n] := by
rw [two_mul, add_assoc, xn_add, add_assoc, ← zero_add 0]
refine (dvd_mul_right (xn a1 n) (xn a1 (n + j))).modEq_zero_nat.add ?_
rw [yn_add, left_distrib, add_assoc, ← zero_add 0]
exact
((dvd_mul_right _ _).mul_left _).modEq_zero_nat.add (xn_modEq_x2n_add_lem _ _ _).modEq_zero_nat
#align pell.xn_modeq_x2n_add Pell.xn_modEq_x2n_add
theorem xn_modEq_x2n_sub_lem {n j} (h : j ≤ n) : xn a1 (2 * n - j) + xn a1 j ≡ 0 [MOD xn a1 n] := by
have h1 : xz a1 n ∣ d a1 * yz a1 n * yz a1 (n - j) + xz a1 j := by
rw [yz_sub _ h, mul_sub_left_distrib, sub_add_eq_add_sub]
exact
dvd_sub
(by
delta xz; delta yz
rw [mul_comm (xn _ _ : ℤ)]
exact mod_cast (xn_modEq_x2n_add_lem _ n j))
((dvd_mul_right _ _).mul_left _)
rw [two_mul, add_tsub_assoc_of_le h, xn_add, add_assoc, ← zero_add 0]
exact
(dvd_mul_right _ _).modEq_zero_nat.add
(Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.1 <| by simpa [xz, yz] using h1).modEq_zero_nat
#align pell.xn_modeq_x2n_sub_lem Pell.xn_modEq_x2n_sub_lem
theorem xn_modEq_x2n_sub {n j} (h : j ≤ 2 * n) : xn a1 (2 * n - j) + xn a1 j ≡ 0 [MOD xn a1 n] :=
(le_total j n).elim (xn_modEq_x2n_sub_lem a1) fun jn => by
have : 2 * n - j + j ≤ n + j := by
rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le h, two_mul]; exact Nat.add_le_add_left jn _
let t := xn_modEq_x2n_sub_lem a1 (Nat.le_of_add_le_add_right this)
rwa [tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le h, add_comm] at t
#align pell.xn_modeq_x2n_sub Pell.xn_modEq_x2n_sub
theorem xn_modEq_x4n_add (n j) : xn a1 (4 * n + j) ≡ xn a1 j [MOD xn a1 n] :=
ModEq.add_right_cancel' (xn a1 (2 * n + j)) <| by
refine @ModEq.trans _ _ 0 _ ?_ (by rw [add_comm]; exact (xn_modEq_x2n_add _ _ _).symm)
rw [show 4 * n = 2 * n + 2 * n from right_distrib 2 2 n, add_assoc]
apply xn_modEq_x2n_add
#align pell.xn_modeq_x4n_add Pell.xn_modEq_x4n_add
theorem xn_modEq_x4n_sub {n j} (h : j ≤ 2 * n) : xn a1 (4 * n - j) ≡ xn a1 j [MOD xn a1 n] :=
have h' : j ≤ 2 * n := le_trans h (by rw [Nat.succ_mul])
ModEq.add_right_cancel' (xn a1 (2 * n - j)) <| by
refine @ModEq.trans _ _ 0 _ ?_ (by rw [add_comm]; exact (xn_modEq_x2n_sub _ h).symm)
rw [show 4 * n = 2 * n + 2 * n from right_distrib 2 2 n, add_tsub_assoc_of_le h']
apply xn_modEq_x2n_add
#align pell.xn_modeq_x4n_sub Pell.xn_modEq_x4n_sub
theorem eq_of_xn_modEq_lem1 {i n} : ∀ {j}, i < j → j < n → xn a1 i % xn a1 n < xn a1 j % xn a1 n
| 0, ij, _ => absurd ij (Nat.not_lt_zero _)
| j + 1, ij, jn => by
suffices xn a1 j % xn a1 n < xn a1 (j + 1) % xn a1 n from
(lt_or_eq_of_le (Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ ij)).elim
(fun h => lt_trans (eq_of_xn_modEq_lem1 h (le_of_lt jn)) this) fun h => by
rw [h]; exact this
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (strictMono_x _ (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt jn)),
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (strictMono_x _ jn)]
exact strictMono_x _ (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
#align pell.eq_of_xn_modeq_lem1 Pell.eq_of_xn_modEq_lem1
theorem eq_of_xn_modEq_lem2 {n} (h : 2 * xn a1 n = xn a1 (n + 1)) : a = 2 ∧ n = 0 := by
rw [xn_succ, mul_comm] at h
have : n = 0 :=
n.eq_zero_or_pos.resolve_right fun np =>
_root_.ne_of_lt
(lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ a1)
(Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right <| mul_pos (d_pos a1) (strictMono_y a1 np)))
h
cases this; simp at h; exact ⟨h.symm, rfl⟩
#align pell.eq_of_xn_modeq_lem2 Pell.eq_of_xn_modEq_lem2
theorem eq_of_xn_modEq_lem3 {i n} (npos : 0 < n) :
∀ {j}, i < j → j ≤ 2 * n → j ≠ n → ¬(a = 2 ∧ n = 1 ∧ i = 0 ∧ j = 2) →
xn a1 i % xn a1 n < xn a1 j % xn a1 n
| 0, ij, _, _, _ => absurd ij (Nat.not_lt_zero _)
| j + 1, ij, j2n, jnn, ntriv =>
have lem2 : ∀ k > n, k ≤ 2 * n → (↑(xn a1 k % xn a1 n) : ℤ) =
xn a1 n - xn a1 (2 * n - k) := fun k kn k2n => by
let k2nl :=
lt_of_add_lt_add_right <|
show 2 * n - k + k < n + k by
rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
· rw [two_mul]
exact add_lt_add_left kn n
exact k2n
have xle : xn a1 (2 * n - k) ≤ xn a1 n := le_of_lt <| strictMono_x a1 k2nl
suffices xn a1 k % xn a1 n = xn a1 n - xn a1 (2 * n - k) by rw [this, Int.ofNat_sub xle]
rw [← Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.sub_lt (x_pos a1 n) (x_pos a1 (2 * n - k)))]
apply ModEq.add_right_cancel' (xn a1 (2 * n - k))
rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le xle]
have t := xn_modEq_x2n_sub_lem a1 k2nl.le
rw [tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le k2n] at t
exact t.trans dvd_rfl.zero_modEq_nat
(lt_trichotomy j n).elim (fun jn : j < n => eq_of_xn_modEq_lem1 _ ij (lt_of_le_of_ne jn jnn))
fun o =>
o.elim
(fun jn : j = n => by
cases jn
apply Int.lt_of_ofNat_lt_ofNat
rw [lem2 (n + 1) (Nat.lt_succ_self _) j2n,
show 2 * n - (n + 1) = n - 1 by
rw [two_mul, tsub_add_eq_tsub_tsub, add_tsub_cancel_right]]
refine lt_sub_left_of_add_lt (Int.ofNat_lt_ofNat_of_lt ?_)
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le <| Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ ij with lin | ein
· rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (strictMono_x _ lin)]
have ll : xn a1 (n - 1) + xn a1 (n - 1) ≤ xn a1 n := by
rw [← two_mul, mul_comm,
show xn a1 n = xn a1 (n - 1 + 1) by rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le (succ_le_of_lt npos)],
xn_succ]
exact le_trans (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ a1) (Nat.le_add_right _ _)
have npm : (n - 1).succ = n := Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos npos
have il : i ≤ n - 1 := by
apply Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ
rw [npm]
exact lin
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le il with ill | ile
· exact lt_of_lt_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add_left (strictMono_x a1 ill) _) ll
· rw [ile]
apply lt_of_le_of_ne ll
rw [← two_mul]
exact fun e =>
ntriv <| by
let ⟨a2, s1⟩ :=
@eq_of_xn_modEq_lem2 _ a1 (n - 1)
(by rwa [tsub_add_cancel_of_le (succ_le_of_lt npos)])
have n1 : n = 1 := le_antisymm (tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mp s1) npos
rw [ile, a2, n1]; exact ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl, rfl⟩
· rw [ein, Nat.mod_self, add_zero]
exact strictMono_x _ (Nat.pred_lt npos.ne'))
fun jn : j > n =>
have lem1 : j ≠ n → xn a1 j % xn a1 n < xn a1 (j + 1) % xn a1 n →
xn a1 i % xn a1 n < xn a1 (j + 1) % xn a1 n :=
fun jn s =>
(lt_or_eq_of_le (Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ ij)).elim
(fun h =>
lt_trans
(eq_of_xn_modEq_lem3 npos h (le_of_lt (Nat.lt_of_succ_le j2n)) jn
fun ⟨a1, n1, i0, j2⟩ => by
rw [n1, j2] at j2n; exact absurd j2n (by decide))
s)
fun h => by rw [h]; exact s
lem1 (_root_.ne_of_gt jn) <|
Int.lt_of_ofNat_lt_ofNat <| by
rw [lem2 j jn (le_of_lt j2n), lem2 (j + 1) (Nat.le_succ_of_le jn) j2n]
refine sub_lt_sub_left (Int.ofNat_lt_ofNat_of_lt <| strictMono_x _ ?_) _
rw [Nat.sub_succ]
exact Nat.pred_lt (_root_.ne_of_gt <| tsub_pos_of_lt j2n)
#align pell.eq_of_xn_modeq_lem3 Pell.eq_of_xn_modEq_lem3
theorem eq_of_xn_modEq_le {i j n} (ij : i ≤ j) (j2n : j ≤ 2 * n)
(h : xn a1 i ≡ xn a1 j [MOD xn a1 n])
(ntriv : ¬(a = 2 ∧ n = 1 ∧ i = 0 ∧ j = 2)) : i = j :=
if npos : n = 0 then by simp_all
else
(lt_or_eq_of_le ij).resolve_left fun ij' =>
if jn : j = n then by
refine _root_.ne_of_gt ?_ h
rw [jn, Nat.mod_self]
have x0 : 0 < xn a1 0 % xn a1 n := by
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (strictMono_x a1 (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero npos))]
exact Nat.succ_pos _
cases' i with i
· exact x0
rw [jn] at ij'
exact
x0.trans
(eq_of_xn_modEq_lem3 _ (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero npos) (Nat.succ_pos _) (le_trans ij j2n)
(_root_.ne_of_lt ij') fun ⟨_, n1, _, i2⟩ => by
rw [n1, i2] at ij'; exact absurd ij' (by decide))
else _root_.ne_of_lt (eq_of_xn_modEq_lem3 a1 (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero npos) ij' j2n jn ntriv) h
#align pell.eq_of_xn_modeq_le Pell.eq_of_xn_modEq_le
theorem eq_of_xn_modEq {i j n} (i2n : i ≤ 2 * n) (j2n : j ≤ 2 * n)
(h : xn a1 i ≡ xn a1 j [MOD xn a1 n])
(ntriv : a = 2 → n = 1 → (i = 0 → j ≠ 2) ∧ (i = 2 → j ≠ 0)) : i = j :=
(le_total i j).elim
(fun ij => eq_of_xn_modEq_le a1 ij j2n h fun ⟨a2, n1, i0, j2⟩ => (ntriv a2 n1).left i0 j2)
fun ij =>
(eq_of_xn_modEq_le a1 ij i2n h.symm fun ⟨a2, n1, j0, i2⟩ => (ntriv a2 n1).right i2 j0).symm
#align pell.eq_of_xn_modeq Pell.eq_of_xn_modEq
theorem eq_of_xn_modEq' {i j n} (ipos : 0 < i) (hin : i ≤ n) (j4n : j ≤ 4 * n)
(h : xn a1 j ≡ xn a1 i [MOD xn a1 n]) : j = i ∨ j + i = 4 * n :=
have i2n : i ≤ 2 * n := by apply le_trans hin; rw [two_mul]; apply Nat.le_add_left
(le_or_gt j (2 * n)).imp
(fun j2n : j ≤ 2 * n =>
eq_of_xn_modEq a1 j2n i2n h fun a2 n1 =>
⟨fun j0 i2 => by rw [n1, i2] at hin; exact absurd hin (by decide), fun _ i0 =>
_root_.ne_of_gt ipos i0⟩)
fun j2n : 2 * n < j =>
suffices i = 4 * n - j by rw [this, add_tsub_cancel_of_le j4n]
have j42n : 4 * n - j ≤ 2 * n :=
Nat.le_of_add_le_add_right <| by
rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le j4n, show 4 * n = 2 * n + 2 * n from right_distrib 2 2 n]
exact Nat.add_le_add_left (le_of_lt j2n) _
eq_of_xn_modEq a1 i2n j42n
(h.symm.trans <| by
let t := xn_modEq_x4n_sub a1 j42n
rwa [tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le j4n] at t)
fun a2 n1 =>
⟨fun i0 => absurd i0 (_root_.ne_of_gt ipos), fun i2 => by
rw [n1, i2] at hin
exact absurd hin (by decide)⟩
#align pell.eq_of_xn_modeq' Pell.eq_of_xn_modEq'
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/PellMatiyasevic.lean | 802 | 822 | theorem modEq_of_xn_modEq {i j n} (ipos : 0 < i) (hin : i ≤ n)
(h : xn a1 j ≡ xn a1 i [MOD xn a1 n]) :
j ≡ i [MOD 4 * n] ∨ j + i ≡ 0 [MOD 4 * n] :=
let j' := j % (4 * n)
have n4 : 0 < 4 * n := mul_pos (by decide) (ipos.trans_le hin)
have jl : j' < 4 * n := Nat.mod_lt _ n4
have jj : j ≡ j' [MOD 4 * n] := by | delta ModEq; rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt jl]
have : ∀ j q, xn a1 (j + 4 * n * q) ≡ xn a1 j [MOD xn a1 n] := by
intro j q; induction' q with q IH
· simp [ModEq.refl]
rw [Nat.mul_succ, ← add_assoc, add_comm]
exact (xn_modEq_x4n_add _ _ _).trans IH
Or.imp (fun ji : j' = i => by rwa [← ji])
(fun ji : j' + i = 4 * n =>
(jj.add_right _).trans <| by
rw [ji]
exact dvd_rfl.modEq_zero_nat)
(eq_of_xn_modEq' a1 ipos hin jl.le <|
(h.symm.trans <| by
rw [← Nat.mod_add_div j (4 * n)]
exact this j' _).symm)
|
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountableInter
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Ordinal
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Cofinality
open Set Filter Cardinal
universe u
variable {ι : Type u} {α β : Type u} {c : Cardinal.{u}}
class CardinalInterFilter (l : Filter α) (c : Cardinal.{u}) : Prop where
cardinal_sInter_mem : ∀ S : Set (Set α), (#S < c) → (∀ s ∈ S, s ∈ l) → ⋂₀ S ∈ l
variable {l : Filter α}
theorem cardinal_sInter_mem {S : Set (Set α)} [CardinalInterFilter l c] (hSc : #S < c) :
⋂₀ S ∈ l ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s ∈ l := ⟨fun hS _s hs => mem_of_superset hS (sInter_subset_of_mem hs),
CardinalInterFilter.cardinal_sInter_mem _ hSc⟩
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/CardinalInter.lean | 52 | 55 | theorem _root_.Filter.cardinalInterFilter_aleph0 (l : Filter α) : CardinalInterFilter l aleph0 where
cardinal_sInter_mem := by |
simp_all only [aleph_zero, lt_aleph0_iff_subtype_finite, setOf_mem_eq, sInter_mem,
implies_true, forall_const]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.List
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bits
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Log
import Mathlib.Data.List.Indexes
import Mathlib.Data.List.Palindrome
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
#align_import data.nat.digits from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"369525b73f229ccd76a6ec0e0e0bf2be57599768"
namespace Nat
variable {n : ℕ}
def digitsAux0 : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| n + 1 => [n + 1]
#align nat.digits_aux_0 Nat.digitsAux0
def digitsAux1 (n : ℕ) : List ℕ :=
List.replicate n 1
#align nat.digits_aux_1 Nat.digitsAux1
def digitsAux (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| n + 1 =>
((n + 1) % b) :: digitsAux b h ((n + 1) / b)
decreasing_by exact Nat.div_lt_self (Nat.succ_pos _) h
#align nat.digits_aux Nat.digitsAux
@[simp]
theorem digitsAux_zero (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) : digitsAux b h 0 = [] := by rw [digitsAux]
#align nat.digits_aux_zero Nat.digitsAux_zero
theorem digitsAux_def (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) (n : ℕ) (w : 0 < n) :
digitsAux b h n = (n % b) :: digitsAux b h (n / b) := by
cases n
· cases w
· rw [digitsAux]
#align nat.digits_aux_def Nat.digitsAux_def
def digits : ℕ → ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => digitsAux0
| 1 => digitsAux1
| b + 2 => digitsAux (b + 2) (by norm_num)
#align nat.digits Nat.digits
@[simp]
theorem digits_zero (b : ℕ) : digits b 0 = [] := by
rcases b with (_ | ⟨_ | ⟨_⟩⟩) <;> simp [digits, digitsAux0, digitsAux1]
#align nat.digits_zero Nat.digits_zero
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem digits_zero_zero : digits 0 0 = [] :=
rfl
#align nat.digits_zero_zero Nat.digits_zero_zero
@[simp]
theorem digits_zero_succ (n : ℕ) : digits 0 n.succ = [n + 1] :=
rfl
#align nat.digits_zero_succ Nat.digits_zero_succ
theorem digits_zero_succ' : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → digits 0 n = [n]
| 0, h => (h rfl).elim
| _ + 1, _ => rfl
#align nat.digits_zero_succ' Nat.digits_zero_succ'
@[simp]
theorem digits_one (n : ℕ) : digits 1 n = List.replicate n 1 :=
rfl
#align nat.digits_one Nat.digits_one
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10685): dsimp can prove this
theorem digits_one_succ (n : ℕ) : digits 1 (n + 1) = 1 :: digits 1 n :=
rfl
#align nat.digits_one_succ Nat.digits_one_succ
theorem digits_add_two_add_one (b n : ℕ) :
digits (b + 2) (n + 1) = ((n + 1) % (b + 2)) :: digits (b + 2) ((n + 1) / (b + 2)) := by
simp [digits, digitsAux_def]
#align nat.digits_add_two_add_one Nat.digits_add_two_add_one
@[simp]
lemma digits_of_two_le_of_pos {b : ℕ} (hb : 2 ≤ b) (hn : 0 < n) :
Nat.digits b n = n % b :: Nat.digits b (n / b) := by
rw [Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq hb rfl, Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq hn rfl, Nat.digits_add_two_add_one]
theorem digits_def' :
∀ {b : ℕ} (_ : 1 < b) {n : ℕ} (_ : 0 < n), digits b n = (n % b) :: digits b (n / b)
| 0, h => absurd h (by decide)
| 1, h => absurd h (by decide)
| b + 2, _ => digitsAux_def _ (by simp) _
#align nat.digits_def' Nat.digits_def'
@[simp]
theorem digits_of_lt (b x : ℕ) (hx : x ≠ 0) (hxb : x < b) : digits b x = [x] := by
rcases exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hx with ⟨x, rfl⟩
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' ((Nat.le_add_left 1 x).trans_lt hxb) with ⟨b, rfl⟩
rw [digits_add_two_add_one, div_eq_of_lt hxb, digits_zero, mod_eq_of_lt hxb]
#align nat.digits_of_lt Nat.digits_of_lt
theorem digits_add (b : ℕ) (h : 1 < b) (x y : ℕ) (hxb : x < b) (hxy : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0) :
digits b (x + b * y) = x :: digits b y := by
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' h with ⟨b, rfl : _ = _ + 2⟩
cases y
· simp [hxb, hxy.resolve_right (absurd rfl)]
dsimp [digits]
rw [digitsAux_def]
· congr
· simp [Nat.add_mod, mod_eq_of_lt hxb]
· simp [add_mul_div_left, div_eq_of_lt hxb]
· apply Nat.succ_pos
#align nat.digits_add Nat.digits_add
-- If we had a function converting a list into a polynomial,
-- and appropriate lemmas about that function,
-- we could rewrite this in terms of that.
def ofDigits {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (b : α) : List ℕ → α
| [] => 0
| h :: t => h + b * ofDigits b t
#align nat.of_digits Nat.ofDigits
theorem ofDigits_eq_foldr {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (b : α) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits b L = List.foldr (fun x y => ↑x + b * y) 0 L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· rfl
· dsimp [ofDigits]
rw [ih]
#align nat.of_digits_eq_foldr Nat.ofDigits_eq_foldr
theorem ofDigits_eq_sum_map_with_index_aux (b : ℕ) (l : List ℕ) :
((List.range l.length).zipWith ((fun i a : ℕ => a * b ^ (i + 1))) l).sum =
b * ((List.range l.length).zipWith (fun i a => a * b ^ i) l).sum := by
suffices
(List.range l.length).zipWith (fun i a : ℕ => a * b ^ (i + 1)) l =
(List.range l.length).zipWith (fun i a => b * (a * b ^ i)) l
by simp [this]
congr; ext; simp [pow_succ]; ring
#align nat.of_digits_eq_sum_map_with_index_aux Nat.ofDigits_eq_sum_map_with_index_aux
theorem ofDigits_eq_sum_mapIdx (b : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits b L = (L.mapIdx fun i a => a * b ^ i).sum := by
rw [List.mapIdx_eq_enum_map, List.enum_eq_zip_range, List.map_uncurry_zip_eq_zipWith,
ofDigits_eq_foldr]
induction' L with hd tl hl
· simp
· simpa [List.range_succ_eq_map, List.zipWith_map_left, ofDigits_eq_sum_map_with_index_aux] using
Or.inl hl
#align nat.of_digits_eq_sum_map_with_index Nat.ofDigits_eq_sum_mapIdx
@[simp]
theorem ofDigits_nil {b : ℕ} : ofDigits b [] = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Digits.lean | 199 | 199 | theorem ofDigits_singleton {b n : ℕ} : ofDigits b [n] = n := by | simp [ofDigits]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Hom.Ring
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Basic
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Basic
open Function Set
universe u v
namespace Cardinal
@[coe] def ofENat : ℕ∞ → Cardinal
| (n : ℕ) => n
| ⊤ => ℵ₀
instance : Coe ENat Cardinal := ⟨Cardinal.ofENat⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ofENat_top : ofENat ⊤ = ℵ₀ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ofENat_nat (n : ℕ) : ofENat n = n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ofENat_zero : ofENat 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ofENat_one : ofENat 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ofENat_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
((no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : ℕ∞)) : Cardinal) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
rfl
lemma ofENat_strictMono : StrictMono ofENat :=
WithTop.strictMono_iff.2 ⟨Nat.strictMono_cast, nat_lt_aleph0⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofENat_lt_ofENat {m n : ℕ∞} : (m : Cardinal) < n ↔ m < n :=
ofENat_strictMono.lt_iff_lt
@[gcongr, mono] alias ⟨_, ofENat_lt_ofENat_of_lt⟩ := ofENat_lt_ofENat
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofENat_lt_aleph0 {m : ℕ∞} : (m : Cardinal) < ℵ₀ ↔ m < ⊤ :=
ofENat_lt_ofENat (n := ⊤)
@[simp] lemma ofENat_lt_nat {m : ℕ∞} {n : ℕ} : ofENat m < n ↔ m < n := by norm_cast
@[simp] lemma ofENat_lt_ofNat {m : ℕ∞} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
ofENat m < no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) ↔ m < OfNat.ofNat n := ofENat_lt_nat
@[simp] lemma nat_lt_ofENat {m : ℕ} {n : ℕ∞} : (m : Cardinal) < n ↔ m < n := by norm_cast
@[simp] lemma ofENat_pos {m : ℕ∞} : 0 < (m : Cardinal) ↔ 0 < m := by norm_cast
@[simp] lemma one_lt_ofENat {m : ℕ∞} : 1 < (m : Cardinal) ↔ 1 < m := by norm_cast
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ofNat_lt_ofENat {m : ℕ} [m.AtLeastTwo] {n : ℕ∞} :
no_index (OfNat.ofNat m : Cardinal) < n ↔ OfNat.ofNat m < n := nat_lt_ofENat
lemma ofENat_mono : Monotone ofENat := ofENat_strictMono.monotone
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofENat_le_ofENat {m n : ℕ∞} : (m : Cardinal) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := ofENat_strictMono.le_iff_le
@[gcongr, mono] alias ⟨_, ofENat_le_ofENat_of_le⟩ := ofENat_le_ofENat
@[simp] lemma ofENat_le_aleph0 (n : ℕ∞) : ↑n ≤ ℵ₀ := ofENat_le_ofENat.2 le_top
@[simp] lemma ofENat_le_nat {m : ℕ∞} {n : ℕ} : ofENat m ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by norm_cast
@[simp] lemma ofENat_le_one {m : ℕ∞} : ofENat m ≤ 1 ↔ m ≤ 1 := by norm_cast
@[simp] lemma ofENat_le_ofNat {m : ℕ∞} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
ofENat m ≤ no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) ↔ m ≤ OfNat.ofNat n := ofENat_le_nat
@[simp] lemma nat_le_ofENat {m : ℕ} {n : ℕ∞} : (m : Cardinal) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by norm_cast
@[simp] lemma one_le_ofENat {n : ℕ∞} : 1 ≤ (n : Cardinal) ↔ 1 ≤ n := by norm_cast
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_le_ofENat {m : ℕ} [m.AtLeastTwo] {n : ℕ∞} :
no_index (OfNat.ofNat m : Cardinal) ≤ n ↔ OfNat.ofNat m ≤ n := nat_le_ofENat
lemma ofENat_injective : Injective ofENat := ofENat_strictMono.injective
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofENat_inj {m n : ℕ∞} : (m : Cardinal) = n ↔ m = n := ofENat_injective.eq_iff
@[simp] lemma ofENat_eq_nat {m : ℕ∞} {n : ℕ} : (m : Cardinal) = n ↔ m = n := by norm_cast
@[simp] lemma nat_eq_ofENat {m : ℕ} {n : ℕ∞} : (m : Cardinal) = n ↔ m = n := by norm_cast
@[simp] lemma ofENat_eq_zero {m : ℕ∞} : (m : Cardinal) = 0 ↔ m = 0 := by norm_cast
@[simp] lemma zero_eq_ofENat {m : ℕ∞} : 0 = (m : Cardinal) ↔ m = 0 := by norm_cast; apply eq_comm
@[simp] lemma ofENat_eq_one {m : ℕ∞} : (m : Cardinal) = 1 ↔ m = 1 := by norm_cast
@[simp] lemma one_eq_ofENat {m : ℕ∞} : 1 = (m : Cardinal) ↔ m = 1 := by norm_cast; apply eq_comm
@[simp] lemma ofENat_eq_ofNat {m : ℕ∞} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(m : Cardinal) = no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) ↔ m = OfNat.ofNat n := ofENat_eq_nat
@[simp] lemma ofNat_eq_ofENat {m : ℕ} {n : ℕ∞} [m.AtLeastTwo] :
no_index (OfNat.ofNat m) = (n : Cardinal) ↔ OfNat.ofNat m = n := nat_eq_ofENat
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma lift_ofENat : ∀ m : ℕ∞, lift.{u, v} m = m
| (m : ℕ) => lift_natCast m
| ⊤ => lift_aleph0
@[simp] lemma lift_lt_ofENat {x : Cardinal.{v}} {m : ℕ∞} : lift.{u} x < m ↔ x < m := by
rw [← lift_ofENat.{u, v}, lift_lt]
@[simp] lemma lift_le_ofENat {x : Cardinal.{v}} {m : ℕ∞} : lift.{u} x ≤ m ↔ x ≤ m := by
rw [← lift_ofENat.{u, v}, lift_le]
@[simp] lemma lift_eq_ofENat {x : Cardinal.{v}} {m : ℕ∞} : lift.{u} x = m ↔ x = m := by
rw [← lift_ofENat.{u, v}, lift_inj]
@[simp] lemma ofENat_lt_lift {x : Cardinal.{v}} {m : ℕ∞} : m < lift.{u} x ↔ m < x := by
rw [← lift_ofENat.{u, v}, lift_lt]
@[simp] lemma ofENat_le_lift {x : Cardinal.{v}} {m : ℕ∞} : m ≤ lift.{u} x ↔ m ≤ x := by
rw [← lift_ofENat.{u, v}, lift_le]
@[simp] lemma ofENat_eq_lift {x : Cardinal.{v}} {m : ℕ∞} : m = lift.{u} x ↔ m = x := by
rw [← lift_ofENat.{u, v}, lift_inj]
@[simp]
lemma range_ofENat : range ofENat = Iic ℵ₀ := by
refine (range_subset_iff.2 ofENat_le_aleph0).antisymm fun x (hx : x ≤ ℵ₀) ↦ ?_
rcases hx.lt_or_eq with hlt | rfl
· lift x to ℕ using hlt
exact mem_range_self (x : ℕ∞)
· exact mem_range_self (⊤ : ℕ∞)
instance : CanLift Cardinal ℕ∞ (↑) (· ≤ ℵ₀) where
prf x := (Set.ext_iff.1 range_ofENat x).2
noncomputable def toENatAux : Cardinal.{u} → ℕ∞ := extend Nat.cast Nat.cast fun _ ↦ ⊤
lemma toENatAux_nat (n : ℕ) : toENatAux n = n := Nat.cast_injective.extend_apply ..
lemma toENatAux_zero : toENatAux 0 = 0 := toENatAux_nat 0
lemma toENatAux_eq_top {a : Cardinal} (ha : ℵ₀ ≤ a) : toENatAux a = ⊤ :=
extend_apply' _ _ _ fun ⟨n, hn⟩ ↦ ha.not_lt <| hn ▸ nat_lt_aleph0 n
lemma toENatAux_ofENat : ∀ n : ℕ∞, toENatAux n = n
| (n : ℕ) => toENatAux_nat n
| ⊤ => toENatAux_eq_top le_rfl
attribute [local simp] toENatAux_nat toENatAux_zero toENatAux_ofENat
lemma toENatAux_gc : GaloisConnection (↑) toENatAux := fun n x ↦ by
cases lt_or_le x ℵ₀ with
| inl hx => lift x to ℕ using hx; simp
| inr hx => simp [toENatAux_eq_top hx, (ofENat_le_aleph0 n).trans hx]
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/ENat.lean | 173 | 176 | theorem toENatAux_le_nat {x : Cardinal} {n : ℕ} : toENatAux x ≤ n ↔ x ≤ n := by |
cases lt_or_le x ℵ₀ with
| inl hx => lift x to ℕ using hx; simp
| inr hx => simp [toENatAux_eq_top hx, (nat_lt_aleph0 n).trans_le hx]
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.DivisionRing
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.FreeAndStrongRankCondition
noncomputable section
universe u v v' v''
variable {K : Type u} {V V₁ : Type v} {V' V'₁ : Type v'} {V'' : Type v''}
open Cardinal Basis Submodule Function Set
namespace LinearMap
section Ring
variable [Ring K] [AddCommGroup V] [Module K V] [AddCommGroup V₁] [Module K V₁]
variable [AddCommGroup V'] [Module K V']
abbrev rank (f : V →ₗ[K] V') : Cardinal :=
Module.rank K (LinearMap.range f)
#align linear_map.rank LinearMap.rank
theorem rank_le_range (f : V →ₗ[K] V') : rank f ≤ Module.rank K V' :=
rank_submodule_le _
#align linear_map.rank_le_range LinearMap.rank_le_range
theorem rank_le_domain (f : V →ₗ[K] V₁) : rank f ≤ Module.rank K V :=
rank_range_le _
#align linear_map.rank_le_domain LinearMap.rank_le_domain
@[simp]
theorem rank_zero [Nontrivial K] : rank (0 : V →ₗ[K] V') = 0 := by
rw [rank, LinearMap.range_zero, rank_bot]
#align linear_map.rank_zero LinearMap.rank_zero
variable [AddCommGroup V''] [Module K V'']
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Dimension/LinearMap.lean | 52 | 55 | theorem rank_comp_le_left (g : V →ₗ[K] V') (f : V' →ₗ[K] V'') : rank (f.comp g) ≤ rank f := by |
refine rank_le_of_submodule _ _ ?_
rw [LinearMap.range_comp]
exact LinearMap.map_le_range
|
import Batteries.Control.ForInStep.Lemmas
import Batteries.Data.List.Basic
import Batteries.Tactic.Init
import Batteries.Tactic.Alias
namespace List
open Nat
@[simp] theorem mem_toArray {a : α} {l : List α} : a ∈ l.toArray ↔ a ∈ l := by
simp [Array.mem_def]
@[simp]
theorem drop_one : ∀ l : List α, drop 1 l = tail l
| [] | _ :: _ => rfl
theorem zipWith_distrib_tail : (zipWith f l l').tail = zipWith f l.tail l'.tail := by
rw [← drop_one]; simp [zipWith_distrib_drop]
theorem subset_def {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ ↔ ∀ {a : α}, a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ := .rfl
@[simp] theorem nil_subset (l : List α) : [] ⊆ l := nofun
@[simp] theorem Subset.refl (l : List α) : l ⊆ l := fun _ i => i
theorem Subset.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ⊆ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ ⊆ l₃) : l₁ ⊆ l₃ :=
fun _ i => h₂ (h₁ i)
instance : Trans (Membership.mem : α → List α → Prop) Subset Membership.mem :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => h₂ h₁⟩
instance : Trans (Subset : List α → List α → Prop) Subset Subset :=
⟨Subset.trans⟩
@[simp] theorem subset_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : l ⊆ a :: l := fun _ => Mem.tail _
theorem subset_of_cons_subset {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : List α} : a :: l₁ ⊆ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
fun s _ i => s (mem_cons_of_mem _ i)
theorem subset_cons_of_subset (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ a :: l₂ :=
fun s _ i => .tail _ (s i)
theorem cons_subset_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} (a : α) (s : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : a :: l₁ ⊆ a :: l₂ :=
fun _ => by simp only [mem_cons]; exact Or.imp_right (@s _)
@[simp] theorem subset_append_left (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₁ ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ := fun _ => mem_append_left _
@[simp] theorem subset_append_right (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₂ ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ := fun _ => mem_append_right _
theorem subset_append_of_subset_left (l₂ : List α) : l ⊆ l₁ → l ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
fun s => Subset.trans s <| subset_append_left _ _
theorem subset_append_of_subset_right (l₁ : List α) : l ⊆ l₂ → l ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
fun s => Subset.trans s <| subset_append_right _ _
@[simp] theorem cons_subset : a :: l ⊆ m ↔ a ∈ m ∧ l ⊆ m := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq]
@[simp] theorem append_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l ↔ l₁ ⊆ l ∧ l₂ ⊆ l := by simp [subset_def, or_imp, forall_and]
theorem subset_nil {l : List α} : l ⊆ [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨fun h => match l with | [] => rfl | _::_ => (nomatch h (.head ..)), fun | rfl => Subset.refl _⟩
theorem map_subset {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (H : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ :=
fun x => by simp only [mem_map]; exact .imp fun a => .imp_left (@H _)
@[simp] theorem nil_sublist : ∀ l : List α, [] <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a :: l => (nil_sublist l).cons a
@[simp] theorem Sublist.refl : ∀ l : List α, l <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a :: l => (Sublist.refl l).cons₂ a
theorem Sublist.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ <+ l₃) : l₁ <+ l₃ := by
induction h₂ generalizing l₁ with
| slnil => exact h₁
| cons _ _ IH => exact (IH h₁).cons _
| @cons₂ l₂ _ a _ IH =>
generalize e : a :: l₂ = l₂'
match e ▸ h₁ with
| .slnil => apply nil_sublist
| .cons a' h₁' => cases e; apply (IH h₁').cons
| .cons₂ a' h₁' => cases e; apply (IH h₁').cons₂
instance : Trans (@Sublist α) Sublist Sublist := ⟨Sublist.trans⟩
@[simp] theorem sublist_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : l <+ a :: l := (Sublist.refl l).cons _
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist : a :: l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
(sublist_cons a l₁).trans
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_left : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, l₁ <+ l₁ ++ l₂
| [], _ => nil_sublist _
| _ :: l₁, l₂ => (sublist_append_left l₁ l₂).cons₂ _
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_right : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, l₂ <+ l₁ ++ l₂
| [], _ => Sublist.refl _
| _ :: l₁, l₂ => (sublist_append_right l₁ l₂).cons _
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_left (s : l <+ l₁) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
s.trans <| sublist_append_left ..
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_right (s : l <+ l₂) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
s.trans <| sublist_append_right ..
@[simp]
theorem cons_sublist_cons : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨fun | .cons _ s => sublist_of_cons_sublist s | .cons₂ _ s => s, .cons₂ _⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_left : ∀ l, l ++ l₁ <+ l ++ l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂
| [] => Iff.rfl
| _ :: l => cons_sublist_cons.trans (append_sublist_append_left l)
theorem Sublist.append_left : l₁ <+ l₂ → ∀ l, l ++ l₁ <+ l ++ l₂ :=
fun h l => (append_sublist_append_left l).mpr h
theorem Sublist.append_right : l₁ <+ l₂ → ∀ l, l₁ ++ l <+ l₂ ++ l
| .slnil, _ => Sublist.refl _
| .cons _ h, _ => (h.append_right _).cons _
| .cons₂ _ h, _ => (h.append_right _).cons₂ _
theorem sublist_or_mem_of_sublist (h : l <+ l₁ ++ a :: l₂) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ ∨ a ∈ l := by
induction l₁ generalizing l with
| nil => match h with
| .cons _ h => exact .inl h
| .cons₂ _ h => exact .inr (.head ..)
| cons b l₁ IH =>
match h with
| .cons _ h => exact (IH h).imp_left (Sublist.cons _)
| .cons₂ _ h => exact (IH h).imp (Sublist.cons₂ _) (.tail _)
theorem Sublist.reverse : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse
| .slnil => Sublist.refl _
| .cons _ h => by rw [reverse_cons]; exact sublist_append_of_sublist_left h.reverse
| .cons₂ _ h => by rw [reverse_cons, reverse_cons]; exact h.reverse.append_right _
@[simp] theorem reverse_sublist : l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨fun h => l₁.reverse_reverse ▸ l₂.reverse_reverse ▸ h.reverse, Sublist.reverse⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_right (l) : l₁ ++ l <+ l₂ ++ l ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨fun h => by
have := h.reverse
simp only [reverse_append, append_sublist_append_left, reverse_sublist] at this
exact this,
fun h => h.append_right l⟩
theorem Sublist.append (hl : l₁ <+ l₂) (hr : r₁ <+ r₂) : l₁ ++ r₁ <+ l₂ ++ r₂ :=
(hl.append_right _).trans ((append_sublist_append_left _).2 hr)
theorem Sublist.subset : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂
| .slnil, _, h => h
| .cons _ s, _, h => .tail _ (s.subset h)
| .cons₂ .., _, .head .. => .head ..
| .cons₂ _ s, _, .tail _ h => .tail _ (s.subset h)
instance : Trans (@Sublist α) Subset Subset :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => trans h₁.subset h₂⟩
instance : Trans Subset (@Sublist α) Subset :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => trans h₁ h₂.subset⟩
instance : Trans (Membership.mem : α → List α → Prop) Sublist Membership.mem :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => h₂.subset h₁⟩
theorem Sublist.length_le : l₁ <+ l₂ → length l₁ ≤ length l₂
| .slnil => Nat.le_refl 0
| .cons _l s => le_succ_of_le (length_le s)
| .cons₂ _ s => succ_le_succ (length_le s)
@[simp] theorem sublist_nil {l : List α} : l <+ [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨fun s => subset_nil.1 s.subset, fun H => H ▸ Sublist.refl _⟩
theorem Sublist.eq_of_length : l₁ <+ l₂ → length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂
| .slnil, _ => rfl
| .cons a s, h => nomatch Nat.not_lt.2 s.length_le (h ▸ lt_succ_self _)
| .cons₂ a s, h => by rw [s.eq_of_length (succ.inj h)]
theorem Sublist.eq_of_length_le (s : l₁ <+ l₂) (h : length l₂ ≤ length l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
s.eq_of_length <| Nat.le_antisymm s.length_le h
@[simp] theorem singleton_sublist {a : α} {l} : [a] <+ l ↔ a ∈ l := by
refine ⟨fun h => h.subset (mem_singleton_self _), fun h => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ := append_of_mem h
exact ((nil_sublist _).cons₂ _).trans (sublist_append_right ..)
@[simp] theorem replicate_sublist_replicate {m n} (a : α) :
replicate m a <+ replicate n a ↔ m ≤ n := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· have := h.length_le; simp only [length_replicate] at this ⊢; exact this
· induction h with
| refl => apply Sublist.refl
| step => simp [*, replicate, Sublist.cons]
theorem isSublist_iff_sublist [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
l₁.isSublist l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ := by
cases l₁ <;> cases l₂ <;> simp [isSublist]
case cons.cons hd₁ tl₁ hd₂ tl₂ =>
if h_eq : hd₁ = hd₂ then
simp [h_eq, cons_sublist_cons, isSublist_iff_sublist]
else
simp only [beq_iff_eq, h_eq]
constructor
· intro h_sub
apply Sublist.cons
exact isSublist_iff_sublist.mp h_sub
· intro h_sub
cases h_sub
case cons h_sub =>
exact isSublist_iff_sublist.mpr h_sub
case cons₂ =>
contradiction
instance [DecidableEq α] (l₁ l₂ : List α) : Decidable (l₁ <+ l₂) :=
decidable_of_iff (l₁.isSublist l₂) isSublist_iff_sublist
theorem tail_eq_tailD (l) : @tail α l = tailD l [] := by cases l <;> rfl
theorem tail_eq_tail? (l) : @tail α l = (tail? l).getD [] := by simp [tail_eq_tailD]
@[simp] theorem next?_nil : @next? α [] = none := rfl
@[simp] theorem next?_cons (a l) : @next? α (a :: l) = some (a, l) := rfl
theorem get_eq_iff : List.get l n = x ↔ l.get? n.1 = some x := by simp [get?_eq_some]
theorem get?_inj
(h₀ : i < xs.length) (h₁ : Nodup xs) (h₂ : xs.get? i = xs.get? j) : i = j := by
induction xs generalizing i j with
| nil => cases h₀
| cons x xs ih =>
match i, j with
| 0, 0 => rfl
| i+1, j+1 => simp; cases h₁ with
| cons ha h₁ => exact ih (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h₀) h₁ h₂
| i+1, 0 => ?_ | 0, j+1 => ?_
all_goals
simp at h₂
cases h₁; rename_i h' h
have := h x ?_ rfl; cases this
rw [mem_iff_get?]
exact ⟨_, h₂⟩; exact ⟨_ , h₂.symm⟩
theorem tail_drop (l : List α) (n : Nat) : (l.drop n).tail = l.drop (n + 1) := by
induction l generalizing n with
| nil => simp
| cons hd tl hl =>
cases n
· simp
· simp [hl]
@[simp] theorem modifyNth_nil (f : α → α) (n) : [].modifyNth f n = [] := by cases n <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem modifyNth_zero_cons (f : α → α) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(a :: l).modifyNth f 0 = f a :: l := rfl
@[simp] theorem modifyNth_succ_cons (f : α → α) (a : α) (l : List α) (n) :
(a :: l).modifyNth f (n + 1) = a :: l.modifyNth f n := by rfl
theorem modifyNthTail_id : ∀ n (l : List α), l.modifyNthTail id n = l
| 0, _ => rfl
| _+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, a :: l => congrArg (cons a) (modifyNthTail_id n l)
theorem eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail : ∀ n (l : List α), eraseIdx l n = modifyNthTail tail n l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, a :: l => congrArg (cons _) (eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail _ _)
@[deprecated] alias removeNth_eq_nth_tail := eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail
theorem get?_modifyNth (f : α → α) :
∀ n (l : List α) m, (modifyNth f n l).get? m = (fun a => if n = m then f a else a) <$> l.get? m
| n, l, 0 => by cases l <;> cases n <;> rfl
| n, [], _+1 => by cases n <;> rfl
| 0, _ :: l, m+1 => by cases h : l.get? m <;> simp [h, modifyNth, m.succ_ne_zero.symm]
| n+1, a :: l, m+1 =>
(get?_modifyNth f n l m).trans <| by
cases h' : l.get? m <;> by_cases h : n = m <;>
simp [h, if_pos, if_neg, Option.map, mt Nat.succ.inj, not_false_iff, h']
theorem modifyNthTail_length (f : List α → List α) (H : ∀ l, length (f l) = length l) :
∀ n l, length (modifyNthTail f n l) = length l
| 0, _ => H _
| _+1, [] => rfl
| _+1, _ :: _ => congrArg (·+1) (modifyNthTail_length _ H _ _)
theorem modifyNthTail_add (f : List α → List α) (n) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
modifyNthTail f (l₁.length + n) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ ++ modifyNthTail f n l₂ := by
induction l₁ <;> simp [*, Nat.succ_add]
theorem exists_of_modifyNthTail (f : List α → List α) {n} {l : List α} (h : n ≤ l.length) :
∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ modifyNthTail f n l = l₁ ++ f l₂ :=
have ⟨_, _, eq, hl⟩ : ∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n :=
⟨_, _, (take_append_drop n l).symm, length_take_of_le h⟩
⟨_, _, eq, hl, hl ▸ eq ▸ modifyNthTail_add (n := 0) ..⟩
@[simp] theorem modify_get?_length (f : α → α) : ∀ n l, length (modifyNth f n l) = length l :=
modifyNthTail_length _ fun l => by cases l <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem get?_modifyNth_eq (f : α → α) (n) (l : List α) :
(modifyNth f n l).get? n = f <$> l.get? n := by
simp only [get?_modifyNth, if_pos]
@[simp] theorem get?_modifyNth_ne (f : α → α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : m ≠ n) :
(modifyNth f m l).get? n = l.get? n := by
simp only [get?_modifyNth, if_neg h, id_map']
theorem exists_of_modifyNth (f : α → α) {n} {l : List α} (h : n < l.length) :
∃ l₁ a l₂, l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ modifyNth f n l = l₁ ++ f a :: l₂ :=
match exists_of_modifyNthTail _ (Nat.le_of_lt h) with
| ⟨_, _::_, eq, hl, H⟩ => ⟨_, _, _, eq, hl, H⟩
| ⟨_, [], eq, hl, _⟩ => nomatch Nat.ne_of_gt h (eq ▸ append_nil _ ▸ hl)
theorem modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop (f : List α → List α) (H : f [] = []) :
∀ n l, modifyNthTail f n l = take n l ++ f (drop n l)
| 0, _ => rfl
| _ + 1, [] => H.symm
| n + 1, b :: l => congrArg (cons b) (modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop f H n l)
theorem modifyNth_eq_take_drop (f : α → α) :
∀ n l, modifyNth f n l = take n l ++ modifyHead f (drop n l) :=
modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop _ rfl
theorem modifyNth_eq_take_cons_drop (f : α → α) {n l} (h) :
modifyNth f n l = take n l ++ f (get l ⟨n, h⟩) :: drop (n + 1) l := by
rw [modifyNth_eq_take_drop, drop_eq_get_cons h]; rfl
theorem set_eq_modifyNth (a : α) : ∀ n (l : List α), set l n a = modifyNth (fun _ => a) n l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, b :: l => congrArg (cons _) (set_eq_modifyNth _ _ _)
theorem set_eq_take_cons_drop (a : α) {n l} (h : n < length l) :
set l n a = take n l ++ a :: drop (n + 1) l := by
rw [set_eq_modifyNth, modifyNth_eq_take_cons_drop _ h]
theorem modifyNth_eq_set_get? (f : α → α) :
∀ n (l : List α), l.modifyNth f n = ((fun a => l.set n (f a)) <$> l.get? n).getD l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, b :: l =>
(congrArg (cons _) (modifyNth_eq_set_get? ..)).trans <| by cases h : l.get? n <;> simp [h]
theorem modifyNth_eq_set_get (f : α → α) {n} {l : List α} (h) :
l.modifyNth f n = l.set n (f (l.get ⟨n, h⟩)) := by
rw [modifyNth_eq_set_get?, get?_eq_get h]; rfl
theorem exists_of_set {l : List α} (h : n < l.length) :
∃ l₁ a l₂, l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ l.set n a' = l₁ ++ a' :: l₂ := by
rw [set_eq_modifyNth]; exact exists_of_modifyNth _ h
theorem exists_of_set' {l : List α} (h : n < l.length) :
∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l.get ⟨n, h⟩ :: l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ l.set n a' = l₁ ++ a' :: l₂ :=
have ⟨_, _, _, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := exists_of_set h; ⟨_, _, get_of_append h₁ h₂ ▸ h₁, h₂, h₃⟩
@[simp]
theorem get?_set_eq (a : α) (n) (l : List α) : (set l n a).get? n = (fun _ => a) <$> l.get? n := by
simp only [set_eq_modifyNth, get?_modifyNth_eq]
theorem get?_set_eq_of_lt (a : α) {n} {l : List α} (h : n < length l) :
(set l n a).get? n = some a := by rw [get?_set_eq, get?_eq_get h]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem get?_set_ne (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : m ≠ n) : (set l m a).get? n = l.get? n := by
simp only [set_eq_modifyNth, get?_modifyNth_ne _ _ h]
theorem get?_set (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) :
(set l m a).get? n = if m = n then (fun _ => a) <$> l.get? n else l.get? n := by
by_cases m = n <;> simp [*, get?_set_eq, get?_set_ne]
theorem get?_set_of_lt (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : n < length l) :
(set l m a).get? n = if m = n then some a else l.get? n := by
simp [get?_set, get?_eq_get h]
theorem get?_set_of_lt' (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : m < length l) :
(set l m a).get? n = if m = n then some a else l.get? n := by
simp [get?_set]; split <;> subst_vars <;> simp [*, get?_eq_get h]
theorem drop_set_of_lt (a : α) {n m : Nat} (l : List α) (h : n < m) :
(l.set n a).drop m = l.drop m :=
List.ext fun i => by rw [get?_drop, get?_drop, get?_set_ne _ _ (by omega)]
theorem take_set_of_lt (a : α) {n m : Nat} (l : List α) (h : m < n) :
(l.set n a).take m = l.take m :=
List.ext fun i => by
rw [get?_take_eq_if, get?_take_eq_if]
split
· next h' => rw [get?_set_ne _ _ (by omega)]
· rfl
theorem length_eraseIdx : ∀ {l i}, i < length l → length (@eraseIdx α l i) = length l - 1
| [], _, _ => rfl
| _::_, 0, _ => by simp [eraseIdx]
| x::xs, i+1, h => by
have : i < length xs := Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h
simp [eraseIdx, ← Nat.add_one]
rw [length_eraseIdx this, Nat.sub_add_cancel (Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _) this)]
@[deprecated] alias length_removeNth := length_eraseIdx
@[simp] theorem length_tail (l : List α) : length (tail l) = length l - 1 := by cases l <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem eraseP_nil : [].eraseP p = [] := rfl
theorem eraseP_cons (a : α) (l : List α) :
(a :: l).eraseP p = bif p a then l else a :: l.eraseP p := rfl
@[simp] theorem eraseP_cons_of_pos {l : List α} (p) (h : p a) : (a :: l).eraseP p = l := by
simp [eraseP_cons, h]
@[simp] theorem eraseP_cons_of_neg {l : List α} (p) (h : ¬p a) :
(a :: l).eraseP p = a :: l.eraseP p := by simp [eraseP_cons, h]
theorem eraseP_of_forall_not {l : List α} (h : ∀ a, a ∈ l → ¬p a) : l.eraseP p = l := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => simp [h _ (.head ..), ih (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
theorem exists_of_eraseP : ∀ {l : List α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a),
∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.eraseP p = l₁ ++ l₂
| b :: l, a, al, pa =>
if pb : p b then
⟨b, [], l, forall_mem_nil _, pb, by simp [pb]⟩
else
match al with
| .head .. => nomatch pb pa
| .tail _ al =>
let ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩ := exists_of_eraseP al pa
⟨c, b::l₁, l₂, (forall_mem_cons ..).2 ⟨pb, h₁⟩,
h₂, by rw [h₃, cons_append], by simp [pb, h₄]⟩
theorem exists_or_eq_self_of_eraseP (p) (l : List α) :
l.eraseP p = l ∨
∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.eraseP p = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
if h : ∃ a ∈ l, p a then
let ⟨_, ha, pa⟩ := h
.inr (exists_of_eraseP ha pa)
else
.inl (eraseP_of_forall_not (h ⟨·, ·, ·⟩))
@[simp] theorem length_eraseP_of_mem (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
length (l.eraseP p) = Nat.pred (length l) := by
let ⟨_, l₁, l₂, _, _, e₁, e₂⟩ := exists_of_eraseP al pa
rw [e₂]; simp [length_append, e₁]; rfl
theorem eraseP_append_left {a : α} (pa : p a) :
∀ {l₁ : List α} l₂, a ∈ l₁ → (l₁++l₂).eraseP p = l₁.eraseP p ++ l₂
| x :: xs, l₂, h => by
by_cases h' : p x <;> simp [h']
rw [eraseP_append_left pa l₂ ((mem_cons.1 h).resolve_left (mt _ h'))]
intro | rfl => exact pa
theorem eraseP_append_right :
∀ {l₁ : List α} l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬p b) → eraseP p (l₁++l₂) = l₁ ++ l₂.eraseP p
| [], l₂, _ => rfl
| x :: xs, l₂, h => by
simp [(forall_mem_cons.1 h).1, eraseP_append_right _ (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
theorem eraseP_sublist (l : List α) : l.eraseP p <+ l := by
match exists_or_eq_self_of_eraseP p l with
| .inl h => rw [h]; apply Sublist.refl
| .inr ⟨c, l₁, l₂, _, _, h₃, h₄⟩ => rw [h₄, h₃]; simp
theorem eraseP_subset (l : List α) : l.eraseP p ⊆ l := (eraseP_sublist l).subset
protected theorem Sublist.eraseP : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁.eraseP p <+ l₂.eraseP p
| .slnil => Sublist.refl _
| .cons a s => by
by_cases h : p a <;> simp [h]
exacts [s.eraseP.trans (eraseP_sublist _), s.eraseP.cons _]
| .cons₂ a s => by
by_cases h : p a <;> simp [h]
exacts [s, s.eraseP]
theorem mem_of_mem_eraseP {l : List α} : a ∈ l.eraseP p → a ∈ l := (eraseP_subset _ ·)
@[simp] theorem mem_eraseP_of_neg {l : List α} (pa : ¬p a) : a ∈ l.eraseP p ↔ a ∈ l := by
refine ⟨mem_of_mem_eraseP, fun al => ?_⟩
match exists_or_eq_self_of_eraseP p l with
| .inl h => rw [h]; assumption
| .inr ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩ =>
rw [h₄]; rw [h₃] at al
have : a ≠ c := fun h => (h ▸ pa).elim h₂
simp [this] at al; simp [al]
theorem eraseP_map (f : β → α) : ∀ (l : List β), (map f l).eraseP p = map f (l.eraseP (p ∘ f))
| [] => rfl
| b::l => by by_cases h : p (f b) <;> simp [h, eraseP_map f l, eraseP_cons_of_pos]
@[simp] theorem extractP_eq_find?_eraseP
(l : List α) : extractP p l = (find? p l, eraseP p l) := by
let rec go (acc) : ∀ xs, l = acc.data ++ xs →
extractP.go p l xs acc = (xs.find? p, acc.data ++ xs.eraseP p)
| [] => fun h => by simp [extractP.go, find?, eraseP, h]
| x::xs => by
simp [extractP.go, find?, eraseP]; cases p x <;> simp
· intro h; rw [go _ xs]; {simp}; simp [h]
exact go #[] _ rfl
@[simp] theorem filter_sublist {p : α → Bool} : ∀ (l : List α), filter p l <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a :: l => by rw [filter]; split <;> simp [Sublist.cons, Sublist.cons₂, filter_sublist l]
theorem length_filter_le (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) :
(l.filter p).length ≤ l.length := (filter_sublist _).length_le
theorem length_filterMap_le (f : α → Option β) (l : List α) :
(filterMap f l).length ≤ l.length := by
rw [← length_map _ some, map_filterMap_some_eq_filter_map_is_some, ← length_map _ f]
apply length_filter_le
protected theorem Sublist.filterMap (f : α → Option β) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) :
filterMap f l₁ <+ filterMap f l₂ := by
induction s <;> simp <;> split <;> simp [*, cons, cons₂]
theorem Sublist.filter (p : α → Bool) {l₁ l₂} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : filter p l₁ <+ filter p l₂ := by
rw [← filterMap_eq_filter]; apply s.filterMap
@[simp]
theorem filter_eq_self {l} : filter p l = l ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a := by
induction l with simp
| cons a l ih =>
cases h : p a <;> simp [*]
intro h; exact Nat.lt_irrefl _ (h ▸ length_filter_le p l)
@[simp]
theorem filter_length_eq_length {l} : (filter p l).length = l.length ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
Iff.trans ⟨l.filter_sublist.eq_of_length, congrArg length⟩ filter_eq_self
@[simp] theorem findIdx_nil {α : Type _} (p : α → Bool) : [].findIdx p = 0 := rfl
theorem findIdx_cons (p : α → Bool) (b : α) (l : List α) :
(b :: l).findIdx p = bif p b then 0 else (l.findIdx p) + 1 := by
cases H : p b with
| true => simp [H, findIdx, findIdx.go]
| false => simp [H, findIdx, findIdx.go, findIdx_go_succ]
where
findIdx_go_succ (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) (n : Nat) :
List.findIdx.go p l (n + 1) = (findIdx.go p l n) + 1 := by
cases l with
| nil => unfold findIdx.go; exact Nat.succ_eq_add_one n
| cons head tail =>
unfold findIdx.go
cases p head <;> simp only [cond_false, cond_true]
exact findIdx_go_succ p tail (n + 1)
theorem findIdx_of_get?_eq_some {xs : List α} (w : xs.get? (xs.findIdx p) = some y) : p y := by
induction xs with
| nil => simp_all
| cons x xs ih => by_cases h : p x <;> simp_all [findIdx_cons]
theorem findIdx_get {xs : List α} {w : xs.findIdx p < xs.length} :
p (xs.get ⟨xs.findIdx p, w⟩) :=
xs.findIdx_of_get?_eq_some (get?_eq_get w)
theorem findIdx_lt_length_of_exists {xs : List α} (h : ∃ x ∈ xs, p x) :
xs.findIdx p < xs.length := by
induction xs with
| nil => simp_all
| cons x xs ih =>
by_cases p x
· simp_all only [forall_exists_index, and_imp, mem_cons, exists_eq_or_imp, true_or,
findIdx_cons, cond_true, length_cons]
apply Nat.succ_pos
· simp_all [findIdx_cons]
refine Nat.succ_lt_succ ?_
obtain ⟨x', m', h'⟩ := h
exact ih x' m' h'
theorem findIdx_get?_eq_get_of_exists {xs : List α} (h : ∃ x ∈ xs, p x) :
xs.get? (xs.findIdx p) = some (xs.get ⟨xs.findIdx p, xs.findIdx_lt_length_of_exists h⟩) :=
get?_eq_get (findIdx_lt_length_of_exists h)
@[simp] theorem findIdx?_nil : ([] : List α).findIdx? p i = none := rfl
@[simp] theorem findIdx?_cons :
(x :: xs).findIdx? p i = if p x then some i else findIdx? p xs (i + 1) := rfl
@[simp] theorem findIdx?_succ :
(xs : List α).findIdx? p (i+1) = (xs.findIdx? p i).map fun i => i + 1 := by
induction xs generalizing i with simp
| cons _ _ _ => split <;> simp_all
theorem findIdx?_eq_some_iff (xs : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
xs.findIdx? p = some i ↔ (xs.take (i + 1)).map p = replicate i false ++ [true] := by
induction xs generalizing i with
| nil => simp
| cons x xs ih =>
simp only [findIdx?_cons, Nat.zero_add, findIdx?_succ, take_succ_cons, map_cons]
split <;> cases i <;> simp_all
theorem findIdx?_of_eq_some {xs : List α} {p : α → Bool} (w : xs.findIdx? p = some i) :
match xs.get? i with | some a => p a | none => false := by
induction xs generalizing i with
| nil => simp_all
| cons x xs ih =>
simp_all only [findIdx?_cons, Nat.zero_add, findIdx?_succ]
split at w <;> cases i <;> simp_all
theorem findIdx?_of_eq_none {xs : List α} {p : α → Bool} (w : xs.findIdx? p = none) :
∀ i, match xs.get? i with | some a => ¬ p a | none => true := by
intro i
induction xs generalizing i with
| nil => simp_all
| cons x xs ih =>
simp_all only [Bool.not_eq_true, findIdx?_cons, Nat.zero_add, findIdx?_succ]
cases i with
| zero =>
split at w <;> simp_all
| succ i =>
simp only [get?_cons_succ]
apply ih
split at w <;> simp_all
@[simp] theorem findIdx?_append :
(xs ++ ys : List α).findIdx? p =
(xs.findIdx? p <|> (ys.findIdx? p).map fun i => i + xs.length) := by
induction xs with simp
| cons _ _ _ => split <;> simp_all [Option.map_orElse, Option.map_map]; rfl
@[simp] theorem findIdx?_replicate :
(replicate n a).findIdx? p = if 0 < n ∧ p a then some 0 else none := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
simp only [replicate, findIdx?_cons, Nat.zero_add, findIdx?_succ, Nat.zero_lt_succ, true_and]
split <;> simp_all
theorem Pairwise.sublist : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₂.Pairwise R → l₁.Pairwise R
| .slnil, h => h
| .cons _ s, .cons _ h₂ => h₂.sublist s
| .cons₂ _ s, .cons h₁ h₂ => (h₂.sublist s).cons fun _ h => h₁ _ (s.subset h)
theorem pairwise_map {l : List α} :
(l.map f).Pairwise R ↔ l.Pairwise fun a b => R (f a) (f b) := by
induction l
· simp
· simp only [map, pairwise_cons, forall_mem_map_iff, *]
theorem pairwise_append {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
(l₁ ++ l₂).Pairwise R ↔ l₁.Pairwise R ∧ l₂.Pairwise R ∧ ∀ a ∈ l₁, ∀ b ∈ l₂, R a b := by
induction l₁ <;> simp [*, or_imp, forall_and, and_assoc, and_left_comm]
theorem pairwise_reverse {l : List α} :
l.reverse.Pairwise R ↔ l.Pairwise (fun a b => R b a) := by
induction l <;> simp [*, pairwise_append, and_comm]
theorem Pairwise.imp {α R S} (H : ∀ {a b}, R a b → S a b) :
∀ {l : List α}, l.Pairwise R → l.Pairwise S
| _, .nil => .nil
| _, .cons h₁ h₂ => .cons (H ∘ h₁ ·) (h₂.imp H)
theorem replaceF_nil : [].replaceF p = [] := rfl
theorem replaceF_cons (a : α) (l : List α) :
(a :: l).replaceF p = match p a with
| none => a :: replaceF p l
| some a' => a' :: l := rfl
theorem replaceF_cons_of_some {l : List α} (p) (h : p a = some a') :
(a :: l).replaceF p = a' :: l := by
simp [replaceF_cons, h]
theorem replaceF_cons_of_none {l : List α} (p) (h : p a = none) :
(a :: l).replaceF p = a :: l.replaceF p := by simp [replaceF_cons, h]
theorem replaceF_of_forall_none {l : List α} (h : ∀ a, a ∈ l → p a = none) : l.replaceF p = l := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => simp [h _ (.head ..), ih (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
theorem exists_of_replaceF : ∀ {l : List α} {a a'} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a = some a'),
∃ a a' l₁ l₂,
(∀ b ∈ l₁, p b = none) ∧ p a = some a' ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.replaceF p = l₁ ++ a' :: l₂
| b :: l, a, a', al, pa =>
match pb : p b with
| some b' => ⟨b, b', [], l, forall_mem_nil _, pb, by simp [pb]⟩
| none =>
match al with
| .head .. => nomatch pb.symm.trans pa
| .tail _ al =>
let ⟨c, c', l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩ := exists_of_replaceF al pa
⟨c, c', b::l₁, l₂, (forall_mem_cons ..).2 ⟨pb, h₁⟩,
h₂, by rw [h₃, cons_append], by simp [pb, h₄]⟩
theorem exists_or_eq_self_of_replaceF (p) (l : List α) :
l.replaceF p = l ∨ ∃ a a' l₁ l₂,
(∀ b ∈ l₁, p b = none) ∧ p a = some a' ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.replaceF p = l₁ ++ a' :: l₂ :=
if h : ∃ a ∈ l, (p a).isSome then
let ⟨_, ha, pa⟩ := h
.inr (exists_of_replaceF ha (Option.get_mem pa))
else
.inl <| replaceF_of_forall_none fun a ha =>
Option.not_isSome_iff_eq_none.1 fun h' => h ⟨a, ha, h'⟩
@[simp] theorem length_replaceF : length (replaceF f l) = length l := by
induction l <;> simp [replaceF]; split <;> simp [*]
theorem disjoint_symm (d : Disjoint l₁ l₂) : Disjoint l₂ l₁ := fun _ i₂ i₁ => d i₁ i₂
theorem disjoint_comm : Disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ Disjoint l₂ l₁ := ⟨disjoint_symm, disjoint_symm⟩
theorem disjoint_left : Disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ l₁ → a ∉ l₂ := by simp [Disjoint]
theorem disjoint_right : Disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ l₂ → a ∉ l₁ := disjoint_comm
theorem disjoint_iff_ne : Disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ a ∈ l₁, ∀ b ∈ l₂, a ≠ b :=
⟨fun h _ al1 _ bl2 ab => h al1 (ab ▸ bl2), fun h _ al1 al2 => h _ al1 _ al2 rfl⟩
theorem disjoint_of_subset_left (ss : l₁ ⊆ l) (d : Disjoint l l₂) : Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
fun _ m => d (ss m)
theorem disjoint_of_subset_right (ss : l₂ ⊆ l) (d : Disjoint l₁ l) : Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
fun _ m m₁ => d m (ss m₁)
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_left {l₁ l₂} : Disjoint (a :: l₁) l₂ → Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_of_subset_left (subset_cons _ _)
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_right {l₁ l₂} : Disjoint l₁ (a :: l₂) → Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_of_subset_right (subset_cons _ _)
@[simp] theorem disjoint_nil_left (l : List α) : Disjoint [] l := fun a => (not_mem_nil a).elim
@[simp] theorem disjoint_nil_right (l : List α) : Disjoint l [] := by
rw [disjoint_comm]; exact disjoint_nil_left _
@[simp 1100] theorem singleton_disjoint : Disjoint [a] l ↔ a ∉ l := by simp [Disjoint]
@[simp 1100] theorem disjoint_singleton : Disjoint l [a] ↔ a ∉ l := by
rw [disjoint_comm, singleton_disjoint]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_append_left : Disjoint (l₁ ++ l₂) l ↔ Disjoint l₁ l ∧ Disjoint l₂ l := by
simp [Disjoint, or_imp, forall_and]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_append_right : Disjoint l (l₁ ++ l₂) ↔ Disjoint l l₁ ∧ Disjoint l l₂ :=
disjoint_comm.trans <| by rw [disjoint_append_left]; simp [disjoint_comm]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_cons_left : Disjoint (a::l₁) l₂ ↔ (a ∉ l₂) ∧ Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
(disjoint_append_left (l₁ := [a])).trans <| by simp [singleton_disjoint]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_cons_right : Disjoint l₁ (a :: l₂) ↔ (a ∉ l₁) ∧ Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_comm.trans <| by rw [disjoint_cons_left]; simp [disjoint_comm]
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_left (d : Disjoint (l₁ ++ l₂) l) : Disjoint l₁ l :=
(disjoint_append_left.1 d).1
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_right (d : Disjoint (l₁ ++ l₂) l) : Disjoint l₂ l :=
(disjoint_append_left.1 d).2
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_right_left (d : Disjoint l (l₁ ++ l₂)) : Disjoint l l₁ :=
(disjoint_append_right.1 d).1
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_right_right (d : Disjoint l (l₁ ++ l₂)) : Disjoint l l₂ :=
(disjoint_append_right.1 d).2
theorem foldl_hom (f : α₁ → α₂) (g₁ : α₁ → β → α₁) (g₂ : α₂ → β → α₂) (l : List β) (init : α₁)
(H : ∀ x y, g₂ (f x) y = f (g₁ x y)) : l.foldl g₂ (f init) = f (l.foldl g₁ init) := by
induction l generalizing init <;> simp [*, H]
theorem foldr_hom (f : β₁ → β₂) (g₁ : α → β₁ → β₁) (g₂ : α → β₂ → β₂) (l : List α) (init : β₁)
(H : ∀ x y, g₂ x (f y) = f (g₁ x y)) : l.foldr g₂ (f init) = f (l.foldr g₁ init) := by
induction l <;> simp [*, H]
theorem inter_def [BEq α] (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₁ ∩ l₂ = filter (elem · l₂) l₁ := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_inter_iff [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] {x : α} {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
x ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ ↔ x ∈ l₁ ∧ x ∈ l₂ := by
cases l₁ <;> simp [List.inter_def, mem_filter]
@[simp]
theorem pair_mem_product {xs : List α} {ys : List β} {x : α} {y : β} :
(x, y) ∈ product xs ys ↔ x ∈ xs ∧ y ∈ ys := by
simp only [product, and_imp, mem_map, Prod.mk.injEq,
exists_eq_right_right, mem_bind, iff_self]
@[simp]
theorem leftpad_length (n : Nat) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(leftpad n a l).length = max n l.length := by
simp only [leftpad, length_append, length_replicate, Nat.sub_add_eq_max]
theorem leftpad_prefix (n : Nat) (a : α) (l : List α) :
replicate (n - length l) a <+: leftpad n a l := by
simp only [IsPrefix, leftpad]
exact Exists.intro l rfl
theorem leftpad_suffix (n : Nat) (a : α) (l : List α) : l <:+ (leftpad n a l) := by
simp only [IsSuffix, leftpad]
exact Exists.intro (replicate (n - length l) a) rfl
-- we use ForIn.forIn as the simp normal form
@[simp] theorem forIn_eq_forIn [Monad m] : @List.forIn α β m _ = forIn := rfl
theorem forIn_eq_bindList [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m]
(f : α → β → m (ForInStep β)) (l : List α) (init : β) :
forIn l init f = ForInStep.run <$> (ForInStep.yield init).bindList f l := by
induction l generalizing init <;> simp [*, map_eq_pure_bind]
congr; ext (b | b) <;> simp
@[simp] theorem forM_append [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (l₁ l₂ : List α) (f : α → m PUnit) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).forM f = (do l₁.forM f; l₂.forM f) := by induction l₁ <;> simp [*]
@[simp] theorem prefix_append (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₁ <+: l₁ ++ l₂ := ⟨l₂, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem suffix_append (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₂ <:+ l₁ ++ l₂ := ⟨l₁, rfl⟩
theorem infix_append (l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α) : l₂ <:+: l₁ ++ l₂ ++ l₃ := ⟨l₁, l₃, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem infix_append' (l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α) : l₂ <:+: l₁ ++ (l₂ ++ l₃) := by
rw [← List.append_assoc]; apply infix_append
theorem IsPrefix.isInfix : l₁ <+: l₂ → l₁ <:+: l₂ := fun ⟨t, h⟩ => ⟨[], t, h⟩
theorem IsSuffix.isInfix : l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₁ <:+: l₂ := fun ⟨t, h⟩ => ⟨t, [], by rw [h, append_nil]⟩
theorem nil_prefix (l : List α) : [] <+: l := ⟨l, rfl⟩
theorem nil_suffix (l : List α) : [] <:+ l := ⟨l, append_nil _⟩
theorem nil_infix (l : List α) : [] <:+: l := (nil_prefix _).isInfix
theorem prefix_refl (l : List α) : l <+: l := ⟨[], append_nil _⟩
theorem suffix_refl (l : List α) : l <:+ l := ⟨[], rfl⟩
theorem infix_refl (l : List α) : l <:+: l := (prefix_refl l).isInfix
@[simp] theorem suffix_cons (a : α) : ∀ l, l <:+ a :: l := suffix_append [a]
theorem infix_cons : l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₁ <:+: a :: l₂ := fun ⟨L₁, L₂, h⟩ => ⟨a :: L₁, L₂, h ▸ rfl⟩
theorem infix_concat : l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₁ <:+: concat l₂ a := fun ⟨L₁, L₂, h⟩ =>
⟨L₁, concat L₂ a, by simp [← h, concat_eq_append, append_assoc]⟩
theorem IsPrefix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α}, l₁ <+: l₂ → l₂ <+: l₃ → l₁ <+: l₃
| _, _, _, ⟨r₁, rfl⟩, ⟨r₂, rfl⟩ => ⟨r₁ ++ r₂, (append_assoc _ _ _).symm⟩
theorem IsSuffix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α}, l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₂ <:+ l₃ → l₁ <:+ l₃
| _, _, _, ⟨l₁, rfl⟩, ⟨l₂, rfl⟩ => ⟨l₂ ++ l₁, append_assoc _ _ _⟩
theorem IsInfix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α}, l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₂ <:+: l₃ → l₁ <:+: l₃
| l, _, _, ⟨l₁, r₁, rfl⟩, ⟨l₂, r₂, rfl⟩ => ⟨l₂ ++ l₁, r₁ ++ r₂, by simp only [append_assoc]⟩
protected theorem IsInfix.sublist : l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂
| ⟨_, _, h⟩ => h ▸ (sublist_append_right ..).trans (sublist_append_left ..)
protected theorem IsInfix.subset (hl : l₁ <:+: l₂) : l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
hl.sublist.subset
protected theorem IsPrefix.sublist (h : l₁ <+: l₂) : l₁ <+ l₂ :=
h.isInfix.sublist
protected theorem IsPrefix.subset (hl : l₁ <+: l₂) : l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
hl.sublist.subset
protected theorem IsSuffix.sublist (h : l₁ <:+ l₂) : l₁ <+ l₂ :=
h.isInfix.sublist
protected theorem IsSuffix.subset (hl : l₁ <:+ l₂) : l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
hl.sublist.subset
@[simp] theorem reverse_suffix : reverse l₁ <:+ reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
⟨fun ⟨r, e⟩ => ⟨reverse r, by rw [← reverse_reverse l₁, ← reverse_append, e, reverse_reverse]⟩,
fun ⟨r, e⟩ => ⟨reverse r, by rw [← reverse_append, e]⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem reverse_prefix : reverse l₁ <+: reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ <:+ l₂ := by
rw [← reverse_suffix]; simp only [reverse_reverse]
@[simp] theorem reverse_infix : reverse l₁ <:+: reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ <:+: l₂ := by
refine ⟨fun ⟨s, t, e⟩ => ⟨reverse t, reverse s, ?_⟩, fun ⟨s, t, e⟩ => ⟨reverse t, reverse s, ?_⟩⟩
· rw [← reverse_reverse l₁, append_assoc, ← reverse_append, ← reverse_append, e,
reverse_reverse]
· rw [append_assoc, ← reverse_append, ← reverse_append, e]
theorem IsInfix.length_le (h : l₁ <:+: l₂) : l₁.length ≤ l₂.length :=
h.sublist.length_le
theorem IsPrefix.length_le (h : l₁ <+: l₂) : l₁.length ≤ l₂.length :=
h.sublist.length_le
theorem IsSuffix.length_le (h : l₁ <:+ l₂) : l₁.length ≤ l₂.length :=
h.sublist.length_le
@[simp] theorem infix_nil : l <:+: [] ↔ l = [] := ⟨(sublist_nil.1 ·.sublist), (· ▸ infix_refl _)⟩
@[simp] theorem prefix_nil : l <+: [] ↔ l = [] := ⟨(sublist_nil.1 ·.sublist), (· ▸ prefix_refl _)⟩
@[simp] theorem suffix_nil : l <:+ [] ↔ l = [] := ⟨(sublist_nil.1 ·.sublist), (· ▸ suffix_refl _)⟩
theorem infix_iff_prefix_suffix (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₁ <:+: l₂ ↔ ∃ t, l₁ <+: t ∧ t <:+ l₂ :=
⟨fun ⟨_, t, e⟩ => ⟨l₁ ++ t, ⟨_, rfl⟩, e ▸ append_assoc .. ▸ ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩,
fun ⟨_, ⟨t, rfl⟩, s, e⟩ => ⟨s, t, append_assoc .. ▸ e⟩⟩
theorem IsInfix.eq_of_length (h : l₁ <:+: l₂) : l₁.length = l₂.length → l₁ = l₂ :=
h.sublist.eq_of_length
theorem IsPrefix.eq_of_length (h : l₁ <+: l₂) : l₁.length = l₂.length → l₁ = l₂ :=
h.sublist.eq_of_length
theorem IsSuffix.eq_of_length (h : l₁ <:+ l₂) : l₁.length = l₂.length → l₁ = l₂ :=
h.sublist.eq_of_length
theorem prefix_of_prefix_length_le :
∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α}, l₁ <+: l₃ → l₂ <+: l₃ → length l₁ ≤ length l₂ → l₁ <+: l₂
| [], l₂, _, _, _, _ => nil_prefix _
| a :: l₁, b :: l₂, _, ⟨r₁, rfl⟩, ⟨r₂, e⟩, ll => by
injection e with _ e'; subst b
rcases prefix_of_prefix_length_le ⟨_, rfl⟩ ⟨_, e'⟩ (le_of_succ_le_succ ll) with ⟨r₃, rfl⟩
exact ⟨r₃, rfl⟩
theorem prefix_or_prefix_of_prefix (h₁ : l₁ <+: l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <+: l₃) : l₁ <+: l₂ ∨ l₂ <+: l₁ :=
(Nat.le_total (length l₁) (length l₂)).imp (prefix_of_prefix_length_le h₁ h₂)
(prefix_of_prefix_length_le h₂ h₁)
theorem suffix_of_suffix_length_le
(h₁ : l₁ <:+ l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <:+ l₃) (ll : length l₁ ≤ length l₂) : l₁ <:+ l₂ :=
reverse_prefix.1 <|
prefix_of_prefix_length_le (reverse_prefix.2 h₁) (reverse_prefix.2 h₂) (by simp [ll])
theorem suffix_or_suffix_of_suffix (h₁ : l₁ <:+ l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <:+ l₃) : l₁ <:+ l₂ ∨ l₂ <:+ l₁ :=
(prefix_or_prefix_of_prefix (reverse_prefix.2 h₁) (reverse_prefix.2 h₂)).imp reverse_prefix.1
reverse_prefix.1
theorem suffix_cons_iff : l₁ <:+ a :: l₂ ↔ l₁ = a :: l₂ ∨ l₁ <:+ l₂ := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨hd, tl⟩, hl₃⟩
· exact Or.inl hl₃
· simp only [cons_append] at hl₃
injection hl₃ with _ hl₄
exact Or.inr ⟨_, hl₄⟩
· rintro (rfl | hl₁)
· exact (a :: l₂).suffix_refl
· exact hl₁.trans (l₂.suffix_cons _)
theorem infix_cons_iff : l₁ <:+: a :: l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: a :: l₂ ∨ l₁ <:+: l₂ := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨hd, tl⟩, t, hl₃⟩
· exact Or.inl ⟨t, hl₃⟩
· simp only [cons_append] at hl₃
injection hl₃ with _ hl₄
exact Or.inr ⟨_, t, hl₄⟩
· rintro (h | hl₁)
· exact h.isInfix
· exact infix_cons hl₁
theorem infix_of_mem_join : ∀ {L : List (List α)}, l ∈ L → l <:+: join L
| l' :: _, h =>
match h with
| List.Mem.head .. => infix_append [] _ _
| List.Mem.tail _ hlMemL =>
IsInfix.trans (infix_of_mem_join hlMemL) <| (suffix_append _ _).isInfix
theorem prefix_append_right_inj (l) : l ++ l₁ <+: l ++ l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
exists_congr fun r => by rw [append_assoc, append_right_inj]
@[simp]
theorem prefix_cons_inj (a) : a :: l₁ <+: a :: l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
prefix_append_right_inj [a]
theorem take_prefix (n) (l : List α) : take n l <+: l :=
⟨_, take_append_drop _ _⟩
theorem drop_suffix (n) (l : List α) : drop n l <:+ l :=
⟨_, take_append_drop _ _⟩
theorem take_sublist (n) (l : List α) : take n l <+ l :=
(take_prefix n l).sublist
theorem drop_sublist (n) (l : List α) : drop n l <+ l :=
(drop_suffix n l).sublist
theorem take_subset (n) (l : List α) : take n l ⊆ l :=
(take_sublist n l).subset
theorem drop_subset (n) (l : List α) : drop n l ⊆ l :=
(drop_sublist n l).subset
theorem mem_of_mem_take {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l.take n) : a ∈ l :=
take_subset n l h
theorem IsPrefix.filter (p : α → Bool) ⦃l₁ l₂ : List α⦄ (h : l₁ <+: l₂) :
l₁.filter p <+: l₂.filter p := by
obtain ⟨xs, rfl⟩ := h
rw [filter_append]; apply prefix_append
theorem IsSuffix.filter (p : α → Bool) ⦃l₁ l₂ : List α⦄ (h : l₁ <:+ l₂) :
l₁.filter p <:+ l₂.filter p := by
obtain ⟨xs, rfl⟩ := h
rw [filter_append]; apply suffix_append
theorem IsInfix.filter (p : α → Bool) ⦃l₁ l₂ : List α⦄ (h : l₁ <:+: l₂) :
l₁.filter p <:+: l₂.filter p := by
obtain ⟨xs, ys, rfl⟩ := h
rw [filter_append, filter_append]; apply infix_append _
theorem mem_of_mem_drop {n} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l.drop n) : a ∈ l := drop_subset _ _ h
theorem disjoint_take_drop : ∀ {l : List α}, l.Nodup → m ≤ n → Disjoint (l.take m) (l.drop n)
| [], _, _ => by simp
| x :: xs, hl, h => by
cases m <;> cases n <;> simp only [disjoint_cons_left, drop, not_mem_nil, disjoint_nil_left,
take, not_false_eq_true, and_self]
· case succ.zero => cases h
· cases hl with | cons h₀ h₁ =>
refine ⟨fun h => h₀ _ (mem_of_mem_drop h) rfl, ?_⟩
exact disjoint_take_drop h₁ (Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h)
attribute [simp] Chain.nil
@[simp]
theorem chain_cons {a b : α} {l : List α} : Chain R a (b :: l) ↔ R a b ∧ Chain R b l :=
⟨fun p => by cases p with | cons n p => exact ⟨n, p⟩,
fun ⟨n, p⟩ => p.cons n⟩
theorem rel_of_chain_cons {a b : α} {l : List α} (p : Chain R a (b :: l)) : R a b :=
(chain_cons.1 p).1
theorem chain_of_chain_cons {a b : α} {l : List α} (p : Chain R a (b :: l)) : Chain R b l :=
(chain_cons.1 p).2
theorem Chain.imp' {R S : α → α → Prop} (HRS : ∀ ⦃a b⦄, R a b → S a b) {a b : α}
(Hab : ∀ ⦃c⦄, R a c → S b c) {l : List α} (p : Chain R a l) : Chain S b l := by
induction p generalizing b with
| nil => constructor
| cons r _ ih =>
constructor
· exact Hab r
· exact ih (@HRS _)
theorem Chain.imp {R S : α → α → Prop} (H : ∀ a b, R a b → S a b) {a : α} {l : List α}
(p : Chain R a l) : Chain S a l :=
p.imp' H (H a)
protected theorem Pairwise.chain (p : Pairwise R (a :: l)) : Chain R a l := by
let ⟨r, p'⟩ := pairwise_cons.1 p; clear p
induction p' generalizing a with
| nil => exact Chain.nil
| @cons b l r' _ IH =>
simp only [chain_cons, forall_mem_cons] at r
exact chain_cons.2 ⟨r.1, IH r'⟩
@[simp] theorem length_range' (s step) : ∀ n : Nat, length (range' s n step) = n
| 0 => rfl
| _ + 1 => congrArg succ (length_range' _ _ _)
@[simp] theorem range'_eq_nil : range' s n step = [] ↔ n = 0 := by
rw [← length_eq_zero, length_range']
theorem mem_range' : ∀{n}, m ∈ range' s n step ↔ ∃ i < n, m = s + step * i
| 0 => by simp [range', Nat.not_lt_zero]
| n + 1 => by
have h (i) : i ≤ n ↔ i = 0 ∨ ∃ j, i = succ j ∧ j < n := by cases i <;> simp [Nat.succ_le]
simp [range', mem_range', Nat.lt_succ, h]; simp only [← exists_and_right, and_assoc]
rw [exists_comm]; simp [Nat.mul_succ, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_comm]
@[simp] theorem mem_range'_1 : m ∈ range' s n ↔ s ≤ m ∧ m < s + n := by
simp [mem_range']; exact ⟨
fun ⟨i, h, e⟩ => e ▸ ⟨Nat.le_add_right .., Nat.add_lt_add_left h _⟩,
fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨m - s, Nat.sub_lt_left_of_lt_add h₁ h₂, (Nat.add_sub_cancel' h₁).symm⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_add_range' (a) : ∀ s n step, map (a + ·) (range' s n step) = range' (a + s) n step
| _, 0, _ => rfl
| s, n + 1, step => by simp [range', map_add_range' _ (s + step) n step, Nat.add_assoc]
theorem map_sub_range' (a s n : Nat) (h : a ≤ s) :
map (· - a) (range' s n step) = range' (s - a) n step := by
conv => lhs; rw [← Nat.add_sub_cancel' h]
rw [← map_add_range', map_map, (?_ : _∘_ = _), map_id]
funext x; apply Nat.add_sub_cancel_left
theorem chain_succ_range' : ∀ s n step : Nat,
Chain (fun a b => b = a + step) s (range' (s + step) n step)
| _, 0, _ => Chain.nil
| s, n + 1, step => (chain_succ_range' (s + step) n step).cons rfl
theorem chain_lt_range' (s n : Nat) {step} (h : 0 < step) :
Chain (· < ·) s (range' (s + step) n step) :=
(chain_succ_range' s n step).imp fun _ _ e => e.symm ▸ Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right h
theorem range'_append : ∀ s m n step : Nat,
range' s m step ++ range' (s + step * m) n step = range' s (n + m) step
| s, 0, n, step => rfl
| s, m + 1, n, step => by
simpa [range', Nat.mul_succ, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_comm]
using range'_append (s + step) m n step
@[simp] theorem range'_append_1 (s m n : Nat) :
range' s m ++ range' (s + m) n = range' s (n + m) := by simpa using range'_append s m n 1
theorem range'_sublist_right {s m n : Nat} : range' s m step <+ range' s n step ↔ m ≤ n :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [length_range'] using h.length_le,
fun h => by rw [← Nat.sub_add_cancel h, ← range'_append]; apply sublist_append_left⟩
theorem range'_subset_right {s m n : Nat} (step0 : 0 < step) :
range' s m step ⊆ range' s n step ↔ m ≤ n := by
refine ⟨fun h => Nat.le_of_not_lt fun hn => ?_, fun h => (range'_sublist_right.2 h).subset⟩
have ⟨i, h', e⟩ := mem_range'.1 <| h <| mem_range'.2 ⟨_, hn, rfl⟩
exact Nat.ne_of_gt h' (Nat.eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left step0 (Nat.add_left_cancel e))
theorem range'_subset_right_1 {s m n : Nat} : range' s m ⊆ range' s n ↔ m ≤ n :=
range'_subset_right (by decide)
theorem get?_range' (s step) : ∀ {m n : Nat}, m < n → get? (range' s n step) m = some (s + step * m)
| 0, n + 1, _ => rfl
| m + 1, n + 1, h =>
(get?_range' (s + step) step (Nat.lt_of_add_lt_add_right h)).trans <| by
simp [Nat.mul_succ, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_comm]
@[simp] theorem get_range' {n m step} (i) (H : i < (range' n m step).length) :
get (range' n m step) ⟨i, H⟩ = n + step * i :=
(get?_eq_some.1 <| get?_range' n step (by simpa using H)).2
theorem range'_concat (s n : Nat) : range' s (n + 1) step = range' s n step ++ [s + step * n] := by
rw [Nat.add_comm n 1]; exact (range'_append s n 1 step).symm
theorem range'_1_concat (s n : Nat) : range' s (n + 1) = range' s n ++ [s + n] := by
simp [range'_concat]
theorem range_loop_range' : ∀ s n : Nat, range.loop s (range' s n) = range' 0 (n + s)
| 0, n => rfl
| s + 1, n => by rw [← Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_right_comm n s 1]; exact range_loop_range' s (n + 1)
theorem range_eq_range' (n : Nat) : range n = range' 0 n :=
(range_loop_range' n 0).trans <| by rw [Nat.zero_add]
theorem range_succ_eq_map (n : Nat) : range (n + 1) = 0 :: map succ (range n) := by
rw [range_eq_range', range_eq_range', range', Nat.add_comm, ← map_add_range']
congr; exact funext one_add
theorem range'_eq_map_range (s n : Nat) : range' s n = map (s + ·) (range n) := by
rw [range_eq_range', map_add_range']; rfl
@[simp] theorem length_range (n : Nat) : length (range n) = n := by
simp only [range_eq_range', length_range']
@[simp] theorem range_eq_nil {n : Nat} : range n = [] ↔ n = 0 := by
rw [← length_eq_zero, length_range]
@[simp]
theorem range_sublist {m n : Nat} : range m <+ range n ↔ m ≤ n := by
simp only [range_eq_range', range'_sublist_right]
@[simp]
theorem range_subset {m n : Nat} : range m ⊆ range n ↔ m ≤ n := by
simp only [range_eq_range', range'_subset_right, lt_succ_self]
@[simp]
theorem mem_range {m n : Nat} : m ∈ range n ↔ m < n := by
simp only [range_eq_range', mem_range'_1, Nat.zero_le, true_and, Nat.zero_add]
theorem not_mem_range_self {n : Nat} : n ∉ range n := by simp
theorem self_mem_range_succ (n : Nat) : n ∈ range (n + 1) := by simp
theorem get?_range {m n : Nat} (h : m < n) : get? (range n) m = some m := by
simp [range_eq_range', get?_range' _ _ h]
theorem range_succ (n : Nat) : range (succ n) = range n ++ [n] := by
simp only [range_eq_range', range'_1_concat, Nat.zero_add]
@[simp] theorem range_zero : range 0 = [] := rfl
theorem range_add (a b : Nat) : range (a + b) = range a ++ (range b).map (a + ·) := by
rw [← range'_eq_map_range]
simpa [range_eq_range', Nat.add_comm] using (range'_append_1 0 a b).symm
theorem iota_eq_reverse_range' : ∀ n : Nat, iota n = reverse (range' 1 n)
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by simp [iota, range'_concat, iota_eq_reverse_range' n, reverse_append, Nat.add_comm]
@[simp] theorem length_iota (n : Nat) : length (iota n) = n := by simp [iota_eq_reverse_range']
@[simp]
theorem mem_iota {m n : Nat} : m ∈ iota n ↔ 1 ≤ m ∧ m ≤ n := by
simp [iota_eq_reverse_range', Nat.add_comm, Nat.lt_succ]
theorem reverse_range' : ∀ s n : Nat, reverse (range' s n) = map (s + n - 1 - ·) (range n)
| s, 0 => rfl
| s, n + 1 => by
rw [range'_1_concat, reverse_append, range_succ_eq_map,
show s + (n + 1) - 1 = s + n from rfl, map, map_map]
simp [reverse_range', Nat.sub_right_comm]; rfl
@[simp] theorem get_range {n} (i) (H : i < (range n).length) : get (range n) ⟨i, H⟩ = i :=
Option.some.inj <| by rw [← get?_eq_get _, get?_range (by simpa using H)]
@[simp] theorem enumFrom_map_fst (n) :
∀ (l : List α), map Prod.fst (enumFrom n l) = range' n l.length
| [] => rfl
| _ :: _ => congrArg (cons _) (enumFrom_map_fst _ _)
@[simp] theorem enum_map_fst (l : List α) : map Prod.fst (enum l) = range l.length := by
simp only [enum, enumFrom_map_fst, range_eq_range']
-- A specialization of `maximum?_eq_some_iff` to Nat.
theorem maximum?_eq_some_iff' {xs : List Nat} :
xs.maximum? = some a ↔ (a ∈ xs ∧ ∀ b ∈ xs, b ≤ a) :=
maximum?_eq_some_iff
(le_refl := Nat.le_refl)
(max_eq_or := fun _ _ => Nat.max_def .. ▸ by split <;> simp)
(max_le_iff := fun _ _ _ => Nat.max_le)
theorem foldrIdx_start :
(xs : List α).foldrIdx f i s = (xs : List α).foldrIdx (fun i => f (i + s)) i := by
induction xs generalizing f i s with
| nil => rfl
| cons h t ih =>
dsimp [foldrIdx]
simp only [@ih f]
simp only [@ih (fun i => f (i + s))]
simp [Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_comm 1 s]
@[simp] theorem foldrIdx_cons :
(x :: xs : List α).foldrIdx f i s = f s x (foldrIdx f i xs (s + 1)) := rfl
theorem findIdxs_cons_aux (p : α → Bool) :
foldrIdx (fun i a is => if p a = true then (i + 1) :: is else is) [] xs s =
map (· + 1) (foldrIdx (fun i a is => if p a = true then i :: is else is) [] xs s) := by
induction xs generalizing s with
| nil => rfl
| cons x xs ih =>
simp only [foldrIdx]
split <;> simp [ih]
theorem findIdxs_cons :
(x :: xs : List α).findIdxs p =
bif p x then 0 :: (xs.findIdxs p).map (· + 1) else (xs.findIdxs p).map (· + 1) := by
dsimp [findIdxs]
rw [cond_eq_if]
split <;>
· simp only [Nat.zero_add, foldrIdx_start, Nat.add_zero, cons.injEq, true_and]
apply findIdxs_cons_aux
@[simp] theorem indexesOf_nil [BEq α] : ([] : List α).indexesOf x = [] := rfl
theorem indexesOf_cons [BEq α] : (x :: xs : List α).indexesOf y =
bif x == y then 0 :: (xs.indexesOf y).map (· + 1) else (xs.indexesOf y).map (· + 1) := by
simp [indexesOf, findIdxs_cons]
@[simp] theorem indexOf_nil [BEq α] : ([] : List α).indexOf x = 0 := rfl
theorem indexOf_cons [BEq α] :
(x :: xs : List α).indexOf y = bif x == y then 0 else xs.indexOf y + 1 := by
dsimp [indexOf]
simp [findIdx_cons]
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/List/Lemmas.lean | 1,484 | 1,496 | theorem indexOf_mem_indexesOf [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] {xs : List α} (m : x ∈ xs) :
xs.indexOf x ∈ xs.indexesOf x := by |
induction xs with
| nil => simp_all
| cons h t ih =>
simp [indexOf_cons, indexesOf_cons, cond_eq_if]
split <;> rename_i w
· apply mem_cons_self
· cases m
case _ => simp_all
case tail m =>
specialize ih m
simpa
|
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FinitePresentation
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Away.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Away.AdjoinRoot
import Mathlib.RingTheory.QuotientNilpotent
import Mathlib.RingTheory.TensorProduct.Basic
-- Porting note: added to make the syntax work below.
open scoped TensorProduct
universe u
namespace Algebra
section
variable (R : Type u) [CommSemiring R]
variable (A : Type u) [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
@[mk_iff]
class FormallyUnramified : Prop where
comp_injective :
∀ ⦃B : Type u⦄ [CommRing B],
∀ [Algebra R B] (I : Ideal B) (_ : I ^ 2 = ⊥),
Function.Injective ((Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ R I).comp : (A →ₐ[R] B) → A →ₐ[R] B ⧸ I)
#align algebra.formally_unramified Algebra.FormallyUnramified
end
namespace FormallyUnramified
section
variable {R : Type u} [CommSemiring R]
variable {A : Type u} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
variable {B : Type u} [CommRing B] [Algebra R B] (I : Ideal B)
theorem lift_unique {B : Type u} [CommRing B] [_RB : Algebra R B]
[FormallyUnramified R A] (I : Ideal B) (hI : IsNilpotent I) (g₁ g₂ : A →ₐ[R] B)
(h : (Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ R I).comp g₁ = (Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ R I).comp g₂) : g₁ = g₂ := by
revert g₁ g₂
change Function.Injective (Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ R I).comp
revert _RB
apply Ideal.IsNilpotent.induction_on (R := B) I hI
· intro B _ I hI _; exact FormallyUnramified.comp_injective I hI
· intro B _ I J hIJ h₁ h₂ _ g₁ g₂ e
apply h₁
apply h₂
ext x
replace e := AlgHom.congr_fun e x
dsimp only [AlgHom.comp_apply, Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ_eq_mk] at e ⊢
rwa [Ideal.Quotient.eq, ← map_sub, Ideal.mem_quotient_iff_mem hIJ, ← Ideal.Quotient.eq]
#align algebra.formally_unramified.lift_unique Algebra.FormallyUnramified.lift_unique
theorem ext [FormallyUnramified R A] (hI : IsNilpotent I) {g₁ g₂ : A →ₐ[R] B}
(H : ∀ x, Ideal.Quotient.mk I (g₁ x) = Ideal.Quotient.mk I (g₂ x)) : g₁ = g₂ :=
FormallyUnramified.lift_unique I hI g₁ g₂ (AlgHom.ext H)
#align algebra.formally_unramified.ext Algebra.FormallyUnramified.ext
theorem lift_unique_of_ringHom [FormallyUnramified R A] {C : Type u} [CommRing C]
(f : B →+* C) (hf : IsNilpotent <| RingHom.ker f) (g₁ g₂ : A →ₐ[R] B)
(h : f.comp ↑g₁ = f.comp (g₂ : A →+* B)) : g₁ = g₂ :=
FormallyUnramified.lift_unique _ hf _ _
(by
ext x
have := RingHom.congr_fun h x
simpa only [Ideal.Quotient.eq, Function.comp_apply, AlgHom.coe_comp, Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ_eq_mk,
RingHom.mem_ker, map_sub, sub_eq_zero])
#align algebra.formally_unramified.lift_unique_of_ring_hom Algebra.FormallyUnramified.lift_unique_of_ringHom
theorem ext' [FormallyUnramified R A] {C : Type u} [CommRing C] (f : B →+* C)
(hf : IsNilpotent <| RingHom.ker f) (g₁ g₂ : A →ₐ[R] B) (h : ∀ x, f (g₁ x) = f (g₂ x)) :
g₁ = g₂ :=
FormallyUnramified.lift_unique_of_ringHom f hf g₁ g₂ (RingHom.ext h)
#align algebra.formally_unramified.ext' Algebra.FormallyUnramified.ext'
theorem lift_unique' [FormallyUnramified R A] {C : Type u} [CommRing C]
[Algebra R C] (f : B →ₐ[R] C) (hf : IsNilpotent <| RingHom.ker (f : B →+* C))
(g₁ g₂ : A →ₐ[R] B) (h : f.comp g₁ = f.comp g₂) : g₁ = g₂ :=
FormallyUnramified.ext' _ hf g₁ g₂ (AlgHom.congr_fun h)
#align algebra.formally_unramified.lift_unique' Algebra.FormallyUnramified.lift_unique'
end
section Comp
variable (R : Type u) [CommSemiring R]
variable (A : Type u) [CommSemiring A] [Algebra R A]
variable (B : Type u) [Semiring B] [Algebra R B] [Algebra A B] [IsScalarTower R A B]
theorem comp [FormallyUnramified R A] [FormallyUnramified A B] :
FormallyUnramified R B := by
constructor
intro C _ _ I hI f₁ f₂ e
have e' :=
FormallyUnramified.lift_unique I ⟨2, hI⟩ (f₁.comp <| IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R A B)
(f₂.comp <| IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R A B) (by rw [← AlgHom.comp_assoc, e, AlgHom.comp_assoc])
letI := (f₁.comp (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R A B)).toRingHom.toAlgebra
let F₁ : B →ₐ[A] C := { f₁ with commutes' := fun r => rfl }
let F₂ : B →ₐ[A] C := { f₂ with commutes' := AlgHom.congr_fun e'.symm }
ext1 x
change F₁ x = F₂ x
congr
exact FormallyUnramified.ext I ⟨2, hI⟩ (AlgHom.congr_fun e)
#align algebra.formally_unramified.comp Algebra.FormallyUnramified.comp
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Unramified/Basic.lean | 155 | 163 | theorem of_comp [FormallyUnramified R B] : FormallyUnramified A B := by |
constructor
intro Q _ _ I e f₁ f₂ e'
letI := ((algebraMap A Q).comp (algebraMap R A)).toAlgebra
letI : IsScalarTower R A Q := IsScalarTower.of_algebraMap_eq' rfl
refine AlgHom.restrictScalars_injective R ?_
refine FormallyUnramified.ext I ⟨2, e⟩ ?_
intro x
exact AlgHom.congr_fun e' x
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.VectorMeasure
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.AEEqOfIntegral
#align_import measure_theory.measure.with_density_vector_measure from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d1bd9c5df2867c1cb463bc6364446d57bdd9f7f1"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal
variable {α β : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α}
namespace MeasureTheory
open TopologicalSpace
variable {μ ν : Measure α}
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [CompleteSpace E]
def Measure.withDensityᵥ {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α → E) : VectorMeasure α E :=
if hf : Integrable f μ then
{ measureOf' := fun s => if MeasurableSet s then ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ else 0
empty' := by simp
not_measurable' := fun s hs => if_neg hs
m_iUnion' := fun s hs₁ hs₂ => by
dsimp only
convert hasSum_integral_iUnion hs₁ hs₂ hf.integrableOn with n
· rw [if_pos (hs₁ n)]
· rw [if_pos (MeasurableSet.iUnion hs₁)] }
else 0
#align measure_theory.measure.with_densityᵥ MeasureTheory.Measure.withDensityᵥ
open Measure
variable {f g : α → E}
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/WithDensityVectorMeasure.lean | 59 | 60 | theorem withDensityᵥ_apply (hf : Integrable f μ) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.withDensityᵥ f s = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ := by | rw [withDensityᵥ, dif_pos hf]; exact dif_pos hs
|
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Real
import Mathlib.Data.Sign
#align_import data.real.ereal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
open Function ENNReal NNReal Set
noncomputable section
def EReal := WithBot (WithTop ℝ)
deriving Bot, Zero, One, Nontrivial, AddMonoid, PartialOrder
#align ereal EReal
instance : ZeroLEOneClass EReal := inferInstanceAs (ZeroLEOneClass (WithBot (WithTop ℝ)))
instance : SupSet EReal := inferInstanceAs (SupSet (WithBot (WithTop ℝ)))
instance : InfSet EReal := inferInstanceAs (InfSet (WithBot (WithTop ℝ)))
instance : CompleteLinearOrder EReal :=
inferInstanceAs (CompleteLinearOrder (WithBot (WithTop ℝ)))
instance : LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid EReal :=
inferInstanceAs (LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid (WithBot (WithTop ℝ)))
instance : AddCommMonoidWithOne EReal :=
inferInstanceAs (AddCommMonoidWithOne (WithBot (WithTop ℝ)))
instance : DenselyOrdered EReal :=
inferInstanceAs (DenselyOrdered (WithBot (WithTop ℝ)))
@[coe] def Real.toEReal : ℝ → EReal := some ∘ some
#align real.to_ereal Real.toEReal
namespace EReal
-- things unify with `WithBot.decidableLT` later if we don't provide this explicitly.
instance decidableLT : DecidableRel ((· < ·) : EReal → EReal → Prop) :=
WithBot.decidableLT
#align ereal.decidable_lt EReal.decidableLT
-- TODO: Provide explicitly, otherwise it is inferred noncomputably from `CompleteLinearOrder`
instance : Top EReal := ⟨some ⊤⟩
instance : Coe ℝ EReal := ⟨Real.toEReal⟩
theorem coe_strictMono : StrictMono Real.toEReal :=
WithBot.coe_strictMono.comp WithTop.coe_strictMono
#align ereal.coe_strict_mono EReal.coe_strictMono
theorem coe_injective : Injective Real.toEReal :=
coe_strictMono.injective
#align ereal.coe_injective EReal.coe_injective
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected theorem coe_le_coe_iff {x y : ℝ} : (x : EReal) ≤ (y : EReal) ↔ x ≤ y :=
coe_strictMono.le_iff_le
#align ereal.coe_le_coe_iff EReal.coe_le_coe_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected theorem coe_lt_coe_iff {x y : ℝ} : (x : EReal) < (y : EReal) ↔ x < y :=
coe_strictMono.lt_iff_lt
#align ereal.coe_lt_coe_iff EReal.coe_lt_coe_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected theorem coe_eq_coe_iff {x y : ℝ} : (x : EReal) = (y : EReal) ↔ x = y :=
coe_injective.eq_iff
#align ereal.coe_eq_coe_iff EReal.coe_eq_coe_iff
protected theorem coe_ne_coe_iff {x y : ℝ} : (x : EReal) ≠ (y : EReal) ↔ x ≠ y :=
coe_injective.ne_iff
#align ereal.coe_ne_coe_iff EReal.coe_ne_coe_iff
@[coe] def _root_.ENNReal.toEReal : ℝ≥0∞ → EReal
| ⊤ => ⊤
| .some x => x.1
#align ennreal.to_ereal ENNReal.toEReal
instance hasCoeENNReal : Coe ℝ≥0∞ EReal :=
⟨ENNReal.toEReal⟩
#align ereal.has_coe_ennreal EReal.hasCoeENNReal
instance : Inhabited EReal := ⟨0⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ((0 : ℝ) : EReal) = 0 := rfl
#align ereal.coe_zero EReal.coe_zero
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_one : ((1 : ℝ) : EReal) = 1 := rfl
#align ereal.coe_one EReal.coe_one
@[elab_as_elim, induction_eliminator, cases_eliminator]
protected def rec {C : EReal → Sort*} (h_bot : C ⊥) (h_real : ∀ a : ℝ, C a) (h_top : C ⊤) :
∀ a : EReal, C a
| ⊥ => h_bot
| (a : ℝ) => h_real a
| ⊤ => h_top
#align ereal.rec EReal.rec
protected def mul : EReal → EReal → EReal
| ⊥, ⊥ => ⊤
| ⊥, ⊤ => ⊥
| ⊥, (y : ℝ) => if 0 < y then ⊥ else if y = 0 then 0 else ⊤
| ⊤, ⊥ => ⊥
| ⊤, ⊤ => ⊤
| ⊤, (y : ℝ) => if 0 < y then ⊤ else if y = 0 then 0 else ⊥
| (x : ℝ), ⊤ => if 0 < x then ⊤ else if x = 0 then 0 else ⊥
| (x : ℝ), ⊥ => if 0 < x then ⊥ else if x = 0 then 0 else ⊤
| (x : ℝ), (y : ℝ) => (x * y : ℝ)
#align ereal.mul EReal.mul
instance : Mul EReal := ⟨EReal.mul⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul (x y : ℝ) : (↑(x * y) : EReal) = x * y :=
rfl
#align ereal.coe_mul EReal.coe_mul
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction₂ {P : EReal → EReal → Prop} (top_top : P ⊤ ⊤) (top_pos : ∀ x : ℝ, 0 < x → P ⊤ x)
(top_zero : P ⊤ 0) (top_neg : ∀ x : ℝ, x < 0 → P ⊤ x) (top_bot : P ⊤ ⊥)
(pos_top : ∀ x : ℝ, 0 < x → P x ⊤) (pos_bot : ∀ x : ℝ, 0 < x → P x ⊥) (zero_top : P 0 ⊤)
(coe_coe : ∀ x y : ℝ, P x y) (zero_bot : P 0 ⊥) (neg_top : ∀ x : ℝ, x < 0 → P x ⊤)
(neg_bot : ∀ x : ℝ, x < 0 → P x ⊥) (bot_top : P ⊥ ⊤) (bot_pos : ∀ x : ℝ, 0 < x → P ⊥ x)
(bot_zero : P ⊥ 0) (bot_neg : ∀ x : ℝ, x < 0 → P ⊥ x) (bot_bot : P ⊥ ⊥) : ∀ x y, P x y
| ⊥, ⊥ => bot_bot
| ⊥, (y : ℝ) => by
rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (hy | rfl | hy)
exacts [bot_neg y hy, bot_zero, bot_pos y hy]
| ⊥, ⊤ => bot_top
| (x : ℝ), ⊥ => by
rcases lt_trichotomy x 0 with (hx | rfl | hx)
exacts [neg_bot x hx, zero_bot, pos_bot x hx]
| (x : ℝ), (y : ℝ) => coe_coe _ _
| (x : ℝ), ⊤ => by
rcases lt_trichotomy x 0 with (hx | rfl | hx)
exacts [neg_top x hx, zero_top, pos_top x hx]
| ⊤, ⊥ => top_bot
| ⊤, (y : ℝ) => by
rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (hy | rfl | hy)
exacts [top_neg y hy, top_zero, top_pos y hy]
| ⊤, ⊤ => top_top
#align ereal.induction₂ EReal.induction₂
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction₂_symm {P : EReal → EReal → Prop} (symm : ∀ {x y}, P x y → P y x)
(top_top : P ⊤ ⊤) (top_pos : ∀ x : ℝ, 0 < x → P ⊤ x) (top_zero : P ⊤ 0)
(top_neg : ∀ x : ℝ, x < 0 → P ⊤ x) (top_bot : P ⊤ ⊥) (pos_bot : ∀ x : ℝ, 0 < x → P x ⊥)
(coe_coe : ∀ x y : ℝ, P x y) (zero_bot : P 0 ⊥) (neg_bot : ∀ x : ℝ, x < 0 → P x ⊥)
(bot_bot : P ⊥ ⊥) : ∀ x y, P x y :=
@induction₂ P top_top top_pos top_zero top_neg top_bot (fun _ h => symm <| top_pos _ h)
pos_bot (symm top_zero) coe_coe zero_bot (fun _ h => symm <| top_neg _ h) neg_bot (symm top_bot)
(fun _ h => symm <| pos_bot _ h) (symm zero_bot) (fun _ h => symm <| neg_bot _ h) bot_bot
protected theorem mul_comm (x y : EReal) : x * y = y * x := by
induction' x with x <;> induction' y with y <;>
try { rfl }
rw [← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, mul_comm]
#align ereal.mul_comm EReal.mul_comm
protected theorem one_mul : ∀ x : EReal, 1 * x = x
| ⊤ => if_pos one_pos
| ⊥ => if_pos one_pos
| (x : ℝ) => congr_arg Real.toEReal (one_mul x)
protected theorem zero_mul : ∀ x : EReal, 0 * x = 0
| ⊤ => (if_neg (lt_irrefl _)).trans (if_pos rfl)
| ⊥ => (if_neg (lt_irrefl _)).trans (if_pos rfl)
| (x : ℝ) => congr_arg Real.toEReal (zero_mul x)
instance : MulZeroOneClass EReal where
one_mul := EReal.one_mul
mul_one := fun x => by rw [EReal.mul_comm, EReal.one_mul]
zero_mul := EReal.zero_mul
mul_zero := fun x => by rw [EReal.mul_comm, EReal.zero_mul]
instance canLift : CanLift EReal ℝ (↑) fun r => r ≠ ⊤ ∧ r ≠ ⊥ where
prf x hx := by
induction x
· simp at hx
· simp
· simp at hx
#align ereal.can_lift EReal.canLift
def toReal : EReal → ℝ
| ⊥ => 0
| ⊤ => 0
| (x : ℝ) => x
#align ereal.to_real EReal.toReal
@[simp]
theorem toReal_top : toReal ⊤ = 0 :=
rfl
#align ereal.to_real_top EReal.toReal_top
@[simp]
theorem toReal_bot : toReal ⊥ = 0 :=
rfl
#align ereal.to_real_bot EReal.toReal_bot
@[simp]
theorem toReal_zero : toReal 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align ereal.to_real_zero EReal.toReal_zero
@[simp]
theorem toReal_one : toReal 1 = 1 :=
rfl
#align ereal.to_real_one EReal.toReal_one
@[simp]
theorem toReal_coe (x : ℝ) : toReal (x : EReal) = x :=
rfl
#align ereal.to_real_coe EReal.toReal_coe
@[simp]
theorem bot_lt_coe (x : ℝ) : (⊥ : EReal) < x :=
WithBot.bot_lt_coe _
#align ereal.bot_lt_coe EReal.bot_lt_coe
@[simp]
theorem coe_ne_bot (x : ℝ) : (x : EReal) ≠ ⊥ :=
(bot_lt_coe x).ne'
#align ereal.coe_ne_bot EReal.coe_ne_bot
@[simp]
theorem bot_ne_coe (x : ℝ) : (⊥ : EReal) ≠ x :=
(bot_lt_coe x).ne
#align ereal.bot_ne_coe EReal.bot_ne_coe
@[simp]
theorem coe_lt_top (x : ℝ) : (x : EReal) < ⊤ :=
WithBot.coe_lt_coe.2 <| WithTop.coe_lt_top _
#align ereal.coe_lt_top EReal.coe_lt_top
@[simp]
theorem coe_ne_top (x : ℝ) : (x : EReal) ≠ ⊤ :=
(coe_lt_top x).ne
#align ereal.coe_ne_top EReal.coe_ne_top
@[simp]
theorem top_ne_coe (x : ℝ) : (⊤ : EReal) ≠ x :=
(coe_lt_top x).ne'
#align ereal.top_ne_coe EReal.top_ne_coe
@[simp]
theorem bot_lt_zero : (⊥ : EReal) < 0 :=
bot_lt_coe 0
#align ereal.bot_lt_zero EReal.bot_lt_zero
@[simp]
theorem bot_ne_zero : (⊥ : EReal) ≠ 0 :=
(coe_ne_bot 0).symm
#align ereal.bot_ne_zero EReal.bot_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem zero_ne_bot : (0 : EReal) ≠ ⊥ :=
coe_ne_bot 0
#align ereal.zero_ne_bot EReal.zero_ne_bot
@[simp]
theorem zero_lt_top : (0 : EReal) < ⊤ :=
coe_lt_top 0
#align ereal.zero_lt_top EReal.zero_lt_top
@[simp]
theorem zero_ne_top : (0 : EReal) ≠ ⊤ :=
coe_ne_top 0
#align ereal.zero_ne_top EReal.zero_ne_top
@[simp]
theorem top_ne_zero : (⊤ : EReal) ≠ 0 :=
(coe_ne_top 0).symm
#align ereal.top_ne_zero EReal.top_ne_zero
theorem range_coe : range Real.toEReal = {⊥, ⊤}ᶜ := by
ext x
induction x <;> simp
theorem range_coe_eq_Ioo : range Real.toEReal = Ioo ⊥ ⊤ := by
ext x
induction x <;> simp
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add (x y : ℝ) : (↑(x + y) : EReal) = x + y :=
rfl
#align ereal.coe_add EReal.coe_add
-- `coe_mul` moved up
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : (↑(n • x) : EReal) = n • (x : EReal) :=
map_nsmul (⟨⟨Real.toEReal, coe_zero⟩, coe_add⟩ : ℝ →+ EReal) _ _
#align ereal.coe_nsmul EReal.coe_nsmul
#noalign ereal.coe_bit0
#noalign ereal.coe_bit1
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_zero {x : ℝ} : (x : EReal) = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
EReal.coe_eq_coe_iff
#align ereal.coe_eq_zero EReal.coe_eq_zero
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_one {x : ℝ} : (x : EReal) = 1 ↔ x = 1 :=
EReal.coe_eq_coe_iff
#align ereal.coe_eq_one EReal.coe_eq_one
theorem coe_ne_zero {x : ℝ} : (x : EReal) ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
EReal.coe_ne_coe_iff
#align ereal.coe_ne_zero EReal.coe_ne_zero
theorem coe_ne_one {x : ℝ} : (x : EReal) ≠ 1 ↔ x ≠ 1 :=
EReal.coe_ne_coe_iff
#align ereal.coe_ne_one EReal.coe_ne_one
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected theorem coe_nonneg {x : ℝ} : (0 : EReal) ≤ x ↔ 0 ≤ x :=
EReal.coe_le_coe_iff
#align ereal.coe_nonneg EReal.coe_nonneg
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected theorem coe_nonpos {x : ℝ} : (x : EReal) ≤ 0 ↔ x ≤ 0 :=
EReal.coe_le_coe_iff
#align ereal.coe_nonpos EReal.coe_nonpos
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected theorem coe_pos {x : ℝ} : (0 : EReal) < x ↔ 0 < x :=
EReal.coe_lt_coe_iff
#align ereal.coe_pos EReal.coe_pos
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected theorem coe_neg' {x : ℝ} : (x : EReal) < 0 ↔ x < 0 :=
EReal.coe_lt_coe_iff
#align ereal.coe_neg' EReal.coe_neg'
theorem toReal_le_toReal {x y : EReal} (h : x ≤ y) (hx : x ≠ ⊥) (hy : y ≠ ⊤) :
x.toReal ≤ y.toReal := by
lift x to ℝ using ⟨ne_top_of_le_ne_top hy h, hx⟩
lift y to ℝ using ⟨hy, ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hx h⟩
simpa using h
#align ereal.to_real_le_to_real EReal.toReal_le_toReal
theorem coe_toReal {x : EReal} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) (h'x : x ≠ ⊥) : (x.toReal : EReal) = x := by
lift x to ℝ using ⟨hx, h'x⟩
rfl
#align ereal.coe_to_real EReal.coe_toReal
theorem le_coe_toReal {x : EReal} (h : x ≠ ⊤) : x ≤ x.toReal := by
by_cases h' : x = ⊥
· simp only [h', bot_le]
· simp only [le_refl, coe_toReal h h']
#align ereal.le_coe_to_real EReal.le_coe_toReal
theorem coe_toReal_le {x : EReal} (h : x ≠ ⊥) : ↑x.toReal ≤ x := by
by_cases h' : x = ⊤
· simp only [h', le_top]
· simp only [le_refl, coe_toReal h' h]
#align ereal.coe_to_real_le EReal.coe_toReal_le
theorem eq_top_iff_forall_lt (x : EReal) : x = ⊤ ↔ ∀ y : ℝ, (y : EReal) < x := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact EReal.coe_lt_top
· contrapose!
intro h
exact ⟨x.toReal, le_coe_toReal h⟩
#align ereal.eq_top_iff_forall_lt EReal.eq_top_iff_forall_lt
theorem eq_bot_iff_forall_lt (x : EReal) : x = ⊥ ↔ ∀ y : ℝ, x < (y : EReal) := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact bot_lt_coe
· contrapose!
intro h
exact ⟨x.toReal, coe_toReal_le h⟩
#align ereal.eq_bot_iff_forall_lt EReal.eq_bot_iff_forall_lt
lemma exists_between_coe_real {x z : EReal} (h : x < z) : ∃ y : ℝ, x < y ∧ y < z := by
obtain ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ := exists_between h
induction a with
| h_bot => exact (not_lt_bot ha₁).elim
| h_real a₀ => exact ⟨a₀, ha₁, ha₂⟩
| h_top => exact (not_top_lt ha₂).elim
@[simp]
lemma image_coe_Icc (x y : ℝ) : Real.toEReal '' Icc x y = Icc ↑x ↑y := by
refine (image_comp WithBot.some WithTop.some _).trans ?_
rw [WithTop.image_coe_Icc, WithBot.image_coe_Icc]
rfl
@[simp]
lemma image_coe_Ico (x y : ℝ) : Real.toEReal '' Ico x y = Ico ↑x ↑y := by
refine (image_comp WithBot.some WithTop.some _).trans ?_
rw [WithTop.image_coe_Ico, WithBot.image_coe_Ico]
rfl
@[simp]
lemma image_coe_Ici (x : ℝ) : Real.toEReal '' Ici x = Ico ↑x ⊤ := by
refine (image_comp WithBot.some WithTop.some _).trans ?_
rw [WithTop.image_coe_Ici, WithBot.image_coe_Ico]
rfl
@[simp]
lemma image_coe_Ioc (x y : ℝ) : Real.toEReal '' Ioc x y = Ioc ↑x ↑y := by
refine (image_comp WithBot.some WithTop.some _).trans ?_
rw [WithTop.image_coe_Ioc, WithBot.image_coe_Ioc]
rfl
@[simp]
lemma image_coe_Ioo (x y : ℝ) : Real.toEReal '' Ioo x y = Ioo ↑x ↑y := by
refine (image_comp WithBot.some WithTop.some _).trans ?_
rw [WithTop.image_coe_Ioo, WithBot.image_coe_Ioo]
rfl
@[simp]
lemma image_coe_Ioi (x : ℝ) : Real.toEReal '' Ioi x = Ioo ↑x ⊤ := by
refine (image_comp WithBot.some WithTop.some _).trans ?_
rw [WithTop.image_coe_Ioi, WithBot.image_coe_Ioo]
rfl
@[simp]
lemma image_coe_Iic (x : ℝ) : Real.toEReal '' Iic x = Ioc ⊥ ↑x := by
refine (image_comp WithBot.some WithTop.some _).trans ?_
rw [WithTop.image_coe_Iic, WithBot.image_coe_Iic]
rfl
@[simp]
lemma image_coe_Iio (x : ℝ) : Real.toEReal '' Iio x = Ioo ⊥ ↑x := by
refine (image_comp WithBot.some WithTop.some _).trans ?_
rw [WithTop.image_coe_Iio, WithBot.image_coe_Iio]
rfl
@[simp]
lemma preimage_coe_Ici (x : ℝ) : Real.toEReal ⁻¹' Ici x = Ici x := by
change (WithBot.some ∘ WithTop.some) ⁻¹' (Ici (WithBot.some (WithTop.some x))) = _
refine preimage_comp.trans ?_
simp only [WithBot.preimage_coe_Ici, WithTop.preimage_coe_Ici]
@[simp]
lemma preimage_coe_Ioi (x : ℝ) : Real.toEReal ⁻¹' Ioi x = Ioi x := by
change (WithBot.some ∘ WithTop.some) ⁻¹' (Ioi (WithBot.some (WithTop.some x))) = _
refine preimage_comp.trans ?_
simp only [WithBot.preimage_coe_Ioi, WithTop.preimage_coe_Ioi]
@[simp]
lemma preimage_coe_Ioi_bot : Real.toEReal ⁻¹' Ioi ⊥ = univ := by
change (WithBot.some ∘ WithTop.some) ⁻¹' (Ioi ⊥) = _
refine preimage_comp.trans ?_
simp only [WithBot.preimage_coe_Ioi_bot, preimage_univ]
@[simp]
lemma preimage_coe_Iic (y : ℝ) : Real.toEReal ⁻¹' Iic y = Iic y := by
change (WithBot.some ∘ WithTop.some) ⁻¹' (Iic (WithBot.some (WithTop.some y))) = _
refine preimage_comp.trans ?_
simp only [WithBot.preimage_coe_Iic, WithTop.preimage_coe_Iic]
@[simp]
lemma preimage_coe_Iio (y : ℝ) : Real.toEReal ⁻¹' Iio y = Iio y := by
change (WithBot.some ∘ WithTop.some) ⁻¹' (Iio (WithBot.some (WithTop.some y))) = _
refine preimage_comp.trans ?_
simp only [WithBot.preimage_coe_Iio, WithTop.preimage_coe_Iio]
@[simp]
lemma preimage_coe_Iio_top : Real.toEReal ⁻¹' Iio ⊤ = univ := by
change (WithBot.some ∘ WithTop.some) ⁻¹' (Iio (WithBot.some ⊤)) = _
refine preimage_comp.trans ?_
simp only [WithBot.preimage_coe_Iio, WithTop.preimage_coe_Iio_top]
@[simp]
lemma preimage_coe_Icc (x y : ℝ) : Real.toEReal ⁻¹' Icc x y = Icc x y := by
simp_rw [← Ici_inter_Iic]
simp
@[simp]
lemma preimage_coe_Ico (x y : ℝ) : Real.toEReal ⁻¹' Ico x y = Ico x y := by
simp_rw [← Ici_inter_Iio]
simp
@[simp]
lemma preimage_coe_Ioc (x y : ℝ) : Real.toEReal ⁻¹' Ioc x y = Ioc x y := by
simp_rw [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
simp
@[simp]
lemma preimage_coe_Ioo (x y : ℝ) : Real.toEReal ⁻¹' Ioo x y = Ioo x y := by
simp_rw [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
simp
@[simp]
lemma preimage_coe_Ico_top (x : ℝ) : Real.toEReal ⁻¹' Ico x ⊤ = Ici x := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iio]
simp
@[simp]
lemma preimage_coe_Ioo_top (x : ℝ) : Real.toEReal ⁻¹' Ioo x ⊤ = Ioi x := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
simp
@[simp]
lemma preimage_coe_Ioc_bot (y : ℝ) : Real.toEReal ⁻¹' Ioc ⊥ y = Iic y := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
simp
@[simp]
lemma preimage_coe_Ioo_bot (y : ℝ) : Real.toEReal ⁻¹' Ioo ⊥ y = Iio y := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
simp
@[simp]
lemma preimage_coe_Ioo_bot_top : Real.toEReal ⁻¹' Ioo ⊥ ⊤ = univ := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
simp
@[simp]
theorem toReal_coe_ennreal : ∀ {x : ℝ≥0∞}, toReal (x : EReal) = ENNReal.toReal x
| ⊤ => rfl
| .some _ => rfl
#align ereal.to_real_coe_ennreal EReal.toReal_coe_ennreal
@[simp]
theorem coe_ennreal_ofReal {x : ℝ} : (ENNReal.ofReal x : EReal) = max x 0 :=
rfl
#align ereal.coe_ennreal_of_real EReal.coe_ennreal_ofReal
theorem coe_nnreal_eq_coe_real (x : ℝ≥0) : ((x : ℝ≥0∞) : EReal) = (x : ℝ) :=
rfl
#align ereal.coe_nnreal_eq_coe_real EReal.coe_nnreal_eq_coe_real
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_ennreal_zero : ((0 : ℝ≥0∞) : EReal) = 0 :=
rfl
#align ereal.coe_ennreal_zero EReal.coe_ennreal_zero
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_ennreal_one : ((1 : ℝ≥0∞) : EReal) = 1 :=
rfl
#align ereal.coe_ennreal_one EReal.coe_ennreal_one
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_ennreal_top : ((⊤ : ℝ≥0∞) : EReal) = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align ereal.coe_ennreal_top EReal.coe_ennreal_top
theorem coe_ennreal_strictMono : StrictMono ((↑) : ℝ≥0∞ → EReal) :=
WithTop.strictMono_iff.2 ⟨fun _ _ => EReal.coe_lt_coe_iff.2, fun _ => coe_lt_top _⟩
#align ereal.coe_ennreal_strict_mono EReal.coe_ennreal_strictMono
theorem coe_ennreal_injective : Injective ((↑) : ℝ≥0∞ → EReal) :=
coe_ennreal_strictMono.injective
#align ereal.coe_ennreal_injective EReal.coe_ennreal_injective
@[simp]
theorem coe_ennreal_eq_top_iff {x : ℝ≥0∞} : (x : EReal) = ⊤ ↔ x = ⊤ :=
coe_ennreal_injective.eq_iff' rfl
#align ereal.coe_ennreal_eq_top_iff EReal.coe_ennreal_eq_top_iff
theorem coe_nnreal_ne_top (x : ℝ≥0) : ((x : ℝ≥0∞) : EReal) ≠ ⊤ := coe_ne_top x
#align ereal.coe_nnreal_ne_top EReal.coe_nnreal_ne_top
@[simp]
theorem coe_nnreal_lt_top (x : ℝ≥0) : ((x : ℝ≥0∞) : EReal) < ⊤ := coe_lt_top x
#align ereal.coe_nnreal_lt_top EReal.coe_nnreal_lt_top
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_ennreal_le_coe_ennreal_iff {x y : ℝ≥0∞} : (x : EReal) ≤ (y : EReal) ↔ x ≤ y :=
coe_ennreal_strictMono.le_iff_le
#align ereal.coe_ennreal_le_coe_ennreal_iff EReal.coe_ennreal_le_coe_ennreal_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_ennreal_lt_coe_ennreal_iff {x y : ℝ≥0∞} : (x : EReal) < (y : EReal) ↔ x < y :=
coe_ennreal_strictMono.lt_iff_lt
#align ereal.coe_ennreal_lt_coe_ennreal_iff EReal.coe_ennreal_lt_coe_ennreal_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_ennreal_eq_coe_ennreal_iff {x y : ℝ≥0∞} : (x : EReal) = (y : EReal) ↔ x = y :=
coe_ennreal_injective.eq_iff
#align ereal.coe_ennreal_eq_coe_ennreal_iff EReal.coe_ennreal_eq_coe_ennreal_iff
theorem coe_ennreal_ne_coe_ennreal_iff {x y : ℝ≥0∞} : (x : EReal) ≠ (y : EReal) ↔ x ≠ y :=
coe_ennreal_injective.ne_iff
#align ereal.coe_ennreal_ne_coe_ennreal_iff EReal.coe_ennreal_ne_coe_ennreal_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_ennreal_eq_zero {x : ℝ≥0∞} : (x : EReal) = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [← coe_ennreal_eq_coe_ennreal_iff, coe_ennreal_zero]
#align ereal.coe_ennreal_eq_zero EReal.coe_ennreal_eq_zero
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_ennreal_eq_one {x : ℝ≥0∞} : (x : EReal) = 1 ↔ x = 1 := by
rw [← coe_ennreal_eq_coe_ennreal_iff, coe_ennreal_one]
#align ereal.coe_ennreal_eq_one EReal.coe_ennreal_eq_one
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_ennreal_ne_zero {x : ℝ≥0∞} : (x : EReal) ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
coe_ennreal_eq_zero.not
#align ereal.coe_ennreal_ne_zero EReal.coe_ennreal_ne_zero
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_ennreal_ne_one {x : ℝ≥0∞} : (x : EReal) ≠ 1 ↔ x ≠ 1 :=
coe_ennreal_eq_one.not
#align ereal.coe_ennreal_ne_one EReal.coe_ennreal_ne_one
theorem coe_ennreal_nonneg (x : ℝ≥0∞) : (0 : EReal) ≤ x :=
coe_ennreal_le_coe_ennreal_iff.2 (zero_le x)
#align ereal.coe_ennreal_nonneg EReal.coe_ennreal_nonneg
@[simp] theorem range_coe_ennreal : range ((↑) : ℝ≥0∞ → EReal) = Set.Ici 0 :=
Subset.antisymm (range_subset_iff.2 coe_ennreal_nonneg) fun x => match x with
| ⊥ => fun h => absurd h bot_lt_zero.not_le
| ⊤ => fun _ => ⟨⊤, rfl⟩
| (x : ℝ) => fun h => ⟨.some ⟨x, EReal.coe_nonneg.1 h⟩, rfl⟩
instance : CanLift EReal ℝ≥0∞ (↑) (0 ≤ ·) := ⟨range_coe_ennreal.ge⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_ennreal_pos {x : ℝ≥0∞} : (0 : EReal) < x ↔ 0 < x := by
rw [← coe_ennreal_zero, coe_ennreal_lt_coe_ennreal_iff]
#align ereal.coe_ennreal_pos EReal.coe_ennreal_pos
@[simp]
theorem bot_lt_coe_ennreal (x : ℝ≥0∞) : (⊥ : EReal) < x :=
(bot_lt_coe 0).trans_le (coe_ennreal_nonneg _)
#align ereal.bot_lt_coe_ennreal EReal.bot_lt_coe_ennreal
@[simp]
theorem coe_ennreal_ne_bot (x : ℝ≥0∞) : (x : EReal) ≠ ⊥ :=
(bot_lt_coe_ennreal x).ne'
#align ereal.coe_ennreal_ne_bot EReal.coe_ennreal_ne_bot
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_ennreal_add (x y : ENNReal) : ((x + y : ℝ≥0∞) : EReal) = x + y := by
cases x <;> cases y <;> rfl
#align ereal.coe_ennreal_add EReal.coe_ennreal_add
private theorem coe_ennreal_top_mul (x : ℝ≥0) : ((⊤ * x : ℝ≥0∞) : EReal) = ⊤ * x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | h0)
· simp
· rw [ENNReal.top_mul (ENNReal.coe_ne_zero.2 h0)]
exact Eq.symm <| if_pos <| NNReal.coe_pos.2 h0.bot_lt
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_ennreal_mul : ∀ x y : ℝ≥0∞, ((x * y : ℝ≥0∞) : EReal) = (x : EReal) * y
| ⊤, ⊤ => rfl
| ⊤, (y : ℝ≥0) => coe_ennreal_top_mul y
| (x : ℝ≥0), ⊤ => by
rw [mul_comm, coe_ennreal_top_mul, EReal.mul_comm, coe_ennreal_top]
| (x : ℝ≥0), (y : ℝ≥0) => by
simp only [← ENNReal.coe_mul, coe_nnreal_eq_coe_real, NNReal.coe_mul, EReal.coe_mul]
#align ereal.coe_ennreal_mul EReal.coe_ennreal_mul
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_ennreal_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ≥0∞) : (↑(n • x) : EReal) = n • (x : EReal) :=
map_nsmul (⟨⟨(↑), coe_ennreal_zero⟩, coe_ennreal_add⟩ : ℝ≥0∞ →+ EReal) _ _
#align ereal.coe_ennreal_nsmul EReal.coe_ennreal_nsmul
#noalign ereal.coe_ennreal_bit0
#noalign ereal.coe_ennreal_bit1
theorem exists_rat_btwn_of_lt :
∀ {a b : EReal}, a < b → ∃ x : ℚ, a < (x : ℝ) ∧ ((x : ℝ) : EReal) < b
| ⊤, b, h => (not_top_lt h).elim
| (a : ℝ), ⊥, h => (lt_irrefl _ ((bot_lt_coe a).trans h)).elim
| (a : ℝ), (b : ℝ), h => by simp [exists_rat_btwn (EReal.coe_lt_coe_iff.1 h)]
| (a : ℝ), ⊤, _ =>
let ⟨b, hab⟩ := exists_rat_gt a
⟨b, by simpa using hab, coe_lt_top _⟩
| ⊥, ⊥, h => (lt_irrefl _ h).elim
| ⊥, (a : ℝ), _ =>
let ⟨b, hab⟩ := exists_rat_lt a
⟨b, bot_lt_coe _, by simpa using hab⟩
| ⊥, ⊤, _ => ⟨0, bot_lt_coe _, coe_lt_top _⟩
#align ereal.exists_rat_btwn_of_lt EReal.exists_rat_btwn_of_lt
theorem lt_iff_exists_rat_btwn {a b : EReal} :
a < b ↔ ∃ x : ℚ, a < (x : ℝ) ∧ ((x : ℝ) : EReal) < b :=
⟨fun hab => exists_rat_btwn_of_lt hab, fun ⟨_x, ax, xb⟩ => ax.trans xb⟩
#align ereal.lt_iff_exists_rat_btwn EReal.lt_iff_exists_rat_btwn
theorem lt_iff_exists_real_btwn {a b : EReal} : a < b ↔ ∃ x : ℝ, a < x ∧ (x : EReal) < b :=
⟨fun hab =>
let ⟨x, ax, xb⟩ := exists_rat_btwn_of_lt hab
⟨(x : ℝ), ax, xb⟩,
fun ⟨_x, ax, xb⟩ => ax.trans xb⟩
#align ereal.lt_iff_exists_real_btwn EReal.lt_iff_exists_real_btwn
def neTopBotEquivReal : ({⊥, ⊤}ᶜ : Set EReal) ≃ ℝ where
toFun x := EReal.toReal x
invFun x := ⟨x, by simp⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => by
lift x to ℝ
· simpa [not_or, and_comm] using hx
· simp
right_inv x := by simp
#align ereal.ne_top_bot_equiv_real EReal.neTopBotEquivReal
@[simp]
theorem add_bot (x : EReal) : x + ⊥ = ⊥ :=
WithBot.add_bot _
#align ereal.add_bot EReal.add_bot
@[simp]
theorem bot_add (x : EReal) : ⊥ + x = ⊥ :=
WithBot.bot_add _
#align ereal.bot_add EReal.bot_add
@[simp]
theorem add_eq_bot_iff {x y : EReal} : x + y = ⊥ ↔ x = ⊥ ∨ y = ⊥ :=
WithBot.add_eq_bot
#align ereal.add_eq_bot_iff EReal.add_eq_bot_iff
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Real/EReal.lean | 789 | 790 | theorem bot_lt_add_iff {x y : EReal} : ⊥ < x + y ↔ ⊥ < x ∧ ⊥ < y := by |
simp [bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, not_or]
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.AdditiveFunctor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Equivalence
#align_import category_theory.idempotents.karoubi from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"200eda15d8ff5669854ff6bcc10aaf37cb70498f"
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Preadditive CategoryTheory.Limits BigOperators
namespace CategoryTheory
variable (C : Type*) [Category C]
namespace Idempotents
-- porting note (#5171): removed @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
structure Karoubi where
X : C
p : X ⟶ X
idem : p ≫ p = p := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi
namespace Karoubi
variable {C}
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] idem
@[ext]
theorem ext {P Q : Karoubi C} (h_X : P.X = Q.X) (h_p : P.p ≫ eqToHom h_X = eqToHom h_X ≫ Q.p) :
P = Q := by
cases P
cases Q
dsimp at h_X h_p
subst h_X
simpa only [mk.injEq, heq_eq_eq, true_and, eqToHom_refl, comp_id, id_comp] using h_p
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.ext CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.ext
@[ext]
structure Hom (P Q : Karoubi C) where
f : P.X ⟶ Q.X
comm : f = P.p ≫ f ≫ Q.p := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.hom CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.Hom
instance [Preadditive C] (P Q : Karoubi C) : Inhabited (Hom P Q) :=
⟨⟨0, by rw [zero_comp, comp_zero]⟩⟩
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem p_comp {P Q : Karoubi C} (f : Hom P Q) : P.p ≫ f.f = f.f := by rw [f.comm, ← assoc, P.idem]
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.p_comp CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.p_comp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Idempotents/Karoubi.lean | 89 | 90 | theorem comp_p {P Q : Karoubi C} (f : Hom P Q) : f.f ≫ Q.p = f.f := by |
rw [f.comm, assoc, assoc, Q.idem]
|
import Mathlib.Data.PFunctor.Multivariate.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.PFunctor.Univariate.M
#align_import data.pfunctor.multivariate.M from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2738d2ca56cbc63be80c3bd48e9ed90ad94e947d"
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
universe u
open MvFunctor
namespace MvPFunctor
open TypeVec
variable {n : ℕ} (P : MvPFunctor.{u} (n + 1))
inductive M.Path : P.last.M → Fin2 n → Type u
| root (x : P.last.M)
(a : P.A)
(f : P.last.B a → P.last.M)
(h : PFunctor.M.dest x = ⟨a, f⟩)
(i : Fin2 n)
(c : P.drop.B a i) : M.Path x i
| child (x : P.last.M)
(a : P.A)
(f : P.last.B a → P.last.M)
(h : PFunctor.M.dest x = ⟨a, f⟩)
(j : P.last.B a)
(i : Fin2 n)
(c : M.Path (f j) i) : M.Path x i
#align mvpfunctor.M.path MvPFunctor.M.Path
instance M.Path.inhabited (x : P.last.M) {i} [Inhabited (P.drop.B x.head i)] :
Inhabited (M.Path P x i) :=
let a := PFunctor.M.head x
let f := PFunctor.M.children x
⟨M.Path.root _ a f
(PFunctor.M.casesOn' x
(r := fun _ => PFunctor.M.dest x = ⟨a, f⟩)
<| by
intros; simp [a, PFunctor.M.dest_mk, PFunctor.M.children_mk]; rfl)
_ default⟩
#align mvpfunctor.M.path.inhabited MvPFunctor.M.Path.inhabited
def mp : MvPFunctor n where
A := P.last.M
B := M.Path P
#align mvpfunctor.Mp MvPFunctor.mp
def M (α : TypeVec n) : Type _ :=
P.mp α
#align mvpfunctor.M MvPFunctor.M
instance mvfunctorM : MvFunctor P.M := by delta M; infer_instance
#align mvpfunctor.mvfunctor_M MvPFunctor.mvfunctorM
instance inhabitedM {α : TypeVec _} [I : Inhabited P.A] [∀ i : Fin2 n, Inhabited (α i)] :
Inhabited (P.M α) :=
@Obj.inhabited _ (mp P) _ (@PFunctor.M.inhabited P.last I) _
#align mvpfunctor.inhabited_M MvPFunctor.inhabitedM
def M.corecShape {β : Type u} (g₀ : β → P.A) (g₂ : ∀ b : β, P.last.B (g₀ b) → β) :
β → P.last.M :=
PFunctor.M.corec fun b => ⟨g₀ b, g₂ b⟩
#align mvpfunctor.M.corec_shape MvPFunctor.M.corecShape
def castDropB {a a' : P.A} (h : a = a') : P.drop.B a ⟹ P.drop.B a' := fun _i b => Eq.recOn h b
#align mvpfunctor.cast_dropB MvPFunctor.castDropB
def castLastB {a a' : P.A} (h : a = a') : P.last.B a → P.last.B a' := fun b => Eq.recOn h b
#align mvpfunctor.cast_lastB MvPFunctor.castLastB
def M.corecContents {α : TypeVec.{u} n}
{β : Type u}
(g₀ : β → P.A)
(g₁ : ∀ b : β, P.drop.B (g₀ b) ⟹ α)
(g₂ : ∀ b : β, P.last.B (g₀ b) → β)
(x : _)
(b : β)
(h: x = M.corecShape P g₀ g₂ b) :
M.Path P x ⟹ α
| _, M.Path.root x a f h' i c =>
have : a = g₀ b := by
rw [h, M.corecShape, PFunctor.M.dest_corec] at h'
cases h'
rfl
g₁ b i (P.castDropB this i c)
| _, M.Path.child x a f h' j i c =>
have h₀ : a = g₀ b := by
rw [h, M.corecShape, PFunctor.M.dest_corec] at h'
cases h'
rfl
have h₁ : f j = M.corecShape P g₀ g₂ (g₂ b (castLastB P h₀ j)) := by
rw [h, M.corecShape, PFunctor.M.dest_corec] at h'
cases h'
rfl
M.corecContents g₀ g₁ g₂ (f j) (g₂ b (P.castLastB h₀ j)) h₁ i c
#align mvpfunctor.M.corec_contents MvPFunctor.M.corecContents
def M.corec' {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type u} (g₀ : β → P.A) (g₁ : ∀ b : β, P.drop.B (g₀ b) ⟹ α)
(g₂ : ∀ b : β, P.last.B (g₀ b) → β) : β → P.M α := fun b =>
⟨M.corecShape P g₀ g₂ b, M.corecContents P g₀ g₁ g₂ _ _ rfl⟩
#align mvpfunctor.M.corec' MvPFunctor.M.corec'
def M.corec {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type u} (g : β → P (α.append1 β)) : β → P.M α :=
M.corec' P (fun b => (g b).fst) (fun b => dropFun (g b).snd) fun b => lastFun (g b).snd
#align mvpfunctor.M.corec MvPFunctor.M.corec
def M.pathDestLeft {α : TypeVec n} {x : P.last.M} {a : P.A} {f : P.last.B a → P.last.M}
(h : PFunctor.M.dest x = ⟨a, f⟩) (f' : M.Path P x ⟹ α) : P.drop.B a ⟹ α := fun i c =>
f' i (M.Path.root x a f h i c)
#align mvpfunctor.M.path_dest_left MvPFunctor.M.pathDestLeft
def M.pathDestRight {α : TypeVec n} {x : P.last.M} {a : P.A} {f : P.last.B a → P.last.M}
(h : PFunctor.M.dest x = ⟨a, f⟩) (f' : M.Path P x ⟹ α) :
∀ j : P.last.B a, M.Path P (f j) ⟹ α := fun j i c => f' i (M.Path.child x a f h j i c)
#align mvpfunctor.M.path_dest_right MvPFunctor.M.pathDestRight
def M.dest' {α : TypeVec n} {x : P.last.M} {a : P.A} {f : P.last.B a → P.last.M}
(h : PFunctor.M.dest x = ⟨a, f⟩) (f' : M.Path P x ⟹ α) : P (α.append1 (P.M α)) :=
⟨a, splitFun (M.pathDestLeft P h f') fun x => ⟨f x, M.pathDestRight P h f' x⟩⟩
#align mvpfunctor.M.dest' MvPFunctor.M.dest'
def M.dest {α : TypeVec n} (x : P.M α) : P (α ::: P.M α) :=
M.dest' P (Sigma.eta <| PFunctor.M.dest x.fst).symm x.snd
#align mvpfunctor.M.dest MvPFunctor.M.dest
def M.mk {α : TypeVec n} : P (α.append1 (P.M α)) → P.M α :=
M.corec _ fun i => appendFun id (M.dest P) <$$> i
#align mvpfunctor.M.mk MvPFunctor.M.mk
theorem M.dest'_eq_dest' {α : TypeVec n} {x : P.last.M} {a₁ : P.A}
{f₁ : P.last.B a₁ → P.last.M} (h₁ : PFunctor.M.dest x = ⟨a₁, f₁⟩) {a₂ : P.A}
{f₂ : P.last.B a₂ → P.last.M} (h₂ : PFunctor.M.dest x = ⟨a₂, f₂⟩) (f' : M.Path P x ⟹ α) :
M.dest' P h₁ f' = M.dest' P h₂ f' := by cases h₁.symm.trans h₂; rfl
#align mvpfunctor.M.dest'_eq_dest' MvPFunctor.M.dest'_eq_dest'
theorem M.dest_eq_dest' {α : TypeVec n} {x : P.last.M} {a : P.A}
{f : P.last.B a → P.last.M} (h : PFunctor.M.dest x = ⟨a, f⟩) (f' : M.Path P x ⟹ α) :
M.dest P ⟨x, f'⟩ = M.dest' P h f' :=
M.dest'_eq_dest' _ _ _ _
#align mvpfunctor.M.dest_eq_dest' MvPFunctor.M.dest_eq_dest'
theorem M.dest_corec' {α : TypeVec.{u} n} {β : Type u} (g₀ : β → P.A)
(g₁ : ∀ b : β, P.drop.B (g₀ b) ⟹ α) (g₂ : ∀ b : β, P.last.B (g₀ b) → β) (x : β) :
M.dest P (M.corec' P g₀ g₁ g₂ x) = ⟨g₀ x, splitFun (g₁ x) (M.corec' P g₀ g₁ g₂ ∘ g₂ x)⟩ :=
rfl
#align mvpfunctor.M.dest_corec' MvPFunctor.M.dest_corec'
theorem M.dest_corec {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type u} (g : β → P (α.append1 β)) (x : β) :
M.dest P (M.corec P g x) = appendFun id (M.corec P g) <$$> g x := by
trans
· apply M.dest_corec'
cases' g x with a f; dsimp
rw [MvPFunctor.map_eq]; congr
conv_rhs => rw [← split_dropFun_lastFun f, appendFun_comp_splitFun]
rfl
#align mvpfunctor.M.dest_corec MvPFunctor.M.dest_corec
theorem M.bisim_lemma {α : TypeVec n} {a₁ : (mp P).A} {f₁ : (mp P).B a₁ ⟹ α} {a' : P.A}
{f' : (P.B a').drop ⟹ α} {f₁' : (P.B a').last → M P α}
(e₁ : M.dest P ⟨a₁, f₁⟩ = ⟨a', splitFun f' f₁'⟩) :
∃ (g₁' : _)(e₁' : PFunctor.M.dest a₁ = ⟨a', g₁'⟩),
f' = M.pathDestLeft P e₁' f₁ ∧
f₁' = fun x : (last P).B a' => ⟨g₁' x, M.pathDestRight P e₁' f₁ x⟩ := by
generalize ef : @splitFun n _ (append1 α (M P α)) f' f₁' = ff at e₁
let he₁' := PFunctor.M.dest a₁;
rcases e₁' : he₁' with ⟨a₁', g₁'⟩;
rw [M.dest_eq_dest' _ e₁'] at e₁
cases e₁; exact ⟨_, e₁', splitFun_inj ef⟩
#align mvpfunctor.M.bisim_lemma MvPFunctor.M.bisim_lemma
theorem M.bisim {α : TypeVec n} (R : P.M α → P.M α → Prop)
(h :
∀ x y,
R x y →
∃ a f f₁ f₂,
M.dest P x = ⟨a, splitFun f f₁⟩ ∧
M.dest P y = ⟨a, splitFun f f₂⟩ ∧ ∀ i, R (f₁ i) (f₂ i))
(x y) (r : R x y) : x = y := by
cases' x with a₁ f₁
cases' y with a₂ f₂
dsimp [mp] at *
have : a₁ = a₂ := by
refine
PFunctor.M.bisim (fun a₁ a₂ => ∃ x y, R x y ∧ x.1 = a₁ ∧ y.1 = a₂) ?_ _ _
⟨⟨a₁, f₁⟩, ⟨a₂, f₂⟩, r, rfl, rfl⟩
rintro _ _ ⟨⟨a₁, f₁⟩, ⟨a₂, f₂⟩, r, rfl, rfl⟩
rcases h _ _ r with ⟨a', f', f₁', f₂', e₁, e₂, h'⟩
rcases M.bisim_lemma P e₁ with ⟨g₁', e₁', rfl, rfl⟩
rcases M.bisim_lemma P e₂ with ⟨g₂', e₂', _, rfl⟩
rw [e₁', e₂']
exact ⟨_, _, _, rfl, rfl, fun b => ⟨_, _, h' b, rfl, rfl⟩⟩
subst this
congr with (i p)
induction' p with x a f h' i c x a f h' i c p IH <;>
try
rcases h _ _ r with ⟨a', f', f₁', f₂', e₁, e₂, h''⟩
rcases M.bisim_lemma P e₁ with ⟨g₁', e₁', rfl, rfl⟩
rcases M.bisim_lemma P e₂ with ⟨g₂', e₂', e₃, rfl⟩
cases h'.symm.trans e₁'
cases h'.symm.trans e₂'
· exact (congr_fun (congr_fun e₃ i) c : _)
· exact IH _ _ (h'' _)
#align mvpfunctor.M.bisim MvPFunctor.M.bisim
theorem M.bisim₀ {α : TypeVec n} (R : P.M α → P.M α → Prop) (h₀ : Equivalence R)
(h : ∀ x y, R x y → (id ::: Quot.mk R) <$$> M.dest _ x = (id ::: Quot.mk R) <$$> M.dest _ y)
(x y) (r : R x y) : x = y := by
apply M.bisim P R _ _ _ r
clear r x y
introv Hr
specialize h _ _ Hr
clear Hr
revert h
rcases M.dest P x with ⟨ax, fx⟩
rcases M.dest P y with ⟨ay, fy⟩
intro h
rw [map_eq, map_eq] at h
injection h with h₀ h₁
subst ay
simp? at h₁ says simp only [heq_eq_eq] at h₁
have Hdrop : dropFun fx = dropFun fy := by
replace h₁ := congr_arg dropFun h₁
simpa using h₁
exists ax, dropFun fx, lastFun fx, lastFun fy
rw [split_dropFun_lastFun, Hdrop, split_dropFun_lastFun]
simp only [true_and]
intro i
replace h₁ := congr_fun (congr_fun h₁ Fin2.fz) i
simp only [TypeVec.comp, appendFun, splitFun] at h₁
replace h₁ := Quot.exact _ h₁
rw [h₀.eqvGen_iff] at h₁
exact h₁
#align mvpfunctor.M.bisim₀ MvPFunctor.M.bisim₀
theorem M.bisim' {α : TypeVec n} (R : P.M α → P.M α → Prop)
(h : ∀ x y, R x y → (id ::: Quot.mk R) <$$> M.dest _ x = (id ::: Quot.mk R) <$$> M.dest _ y)
(x y) (r : R x y) : x = y := by
have := M.bisim₀ P (EqvGen R) ?_ ?_
· solve_by_elim [EqvGen.rel]
· apply EqvGen.is_equivalence
· clear r x y
introv Hr
have : ∀ x y, R x y → EqvGen R x y := @EqvGen.rel _ R
induction Hr
· rw [← Quot.factor_mk_eq R (EqvGen R) this]
rwa [appendFun_comp_id, ← MvFunctor.map_map, ← MvFunctor.map_map, h]
-- Porting note: `cc` was replaced with `aesop`, maybe there is a more light-weight solution?
all_goals aesop
#align mvpfunctor.M.bisim' MvPFunctor.M.bisim'
theorem M.dest_map {α β : TypeVec n} (g : α ⟹ β) (x : P.M α) :
M.dest P (g <$$> x) = (appendFun g fun x => g <$$> x) <$$> M.dest P x := by
cases' x with a f
rw [map_eq]
conv =>
rhs
rw [M.dest, M.dest', map_eq, appendFun_comp_splitFun]
rfl
#align mvpfunctor.M.dest_map MvPFunctor.M.dest_map
| Mathlib/Data/PFunctor/Multivariate/M.lean | 328 | 333 | theorem M.map_dest {α β : TypeVec n} (g : (α ::: P.M α) ⟹ (β ::: P.M β)) (x : P.M α)
(h : ∀ x : P.M α, lastFun g x = (dropFun g <$$> x : P.M β)) :
g <$$> M.dest P x = M.dest P (dropFun g <$$> x) := by |
rw [M.dest_map]; congr
apply eq_of_drop_last_eq <;> simp
ext1; apply h
|
import Mathlib.Probability.Variance
#align_import probability.moments from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"85453a2a14be8da64caf15ca50930cf4c6e5d8de"
open MeasureTheory Filter Finset Real
noncomputable section
open scoped MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory ENNReal NNReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory
variable {Ω ι : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} {X : Ω → ℝ} {p : ℕ} {μ : Measure Ω}
def moment (X : Ω → ℝ) (p : ℕ) (μ : Measure Ω) : ℝ :=
μ[X ^ p]
#align probability_theory.moment ProbabilityTheory.moment
def centralMoment (X : Ω → ℝ) (p : ℕ) (μ : Measure Ω) : ℝ := by
have m := fun (x : Ω) => μ[X] -- Porting note: Lean deems `μ[(X - fun x => μ[X]) ^ p]` ambiguous
exact μ[(X - m) ^ p]
#align probability_theory.central_moment ProbabilityTheory.centralMoment
@[simp]
theorem moment_zero (hp : p ≠ 0) : moment 0 p μ = 0 := by
simp only [moment, hp, zero_pow, Ne, not_false_iff, Pi.zero_apply, integral_const,
smul_eq_mul, mul_zero, integral_zero]
#align probability_theory.moment_zero ProbabilityTheory.moment_zero
@[simp]
theorem centralMoment_zero (hp : p ≠ 0) : centralMoment 0 p μ = 0 := by
simp only [centralMoment, hp, Pi.zero_apply, integral_const, smul_eq_mul,
mul_zero, zero_sub, Pi.pow_apply, Pi.neg_apply, neg_zero, zero_pow, Ne, not_false_iff]
#align probability_theory.central_moment_zero ProbabilityTheory.centralMoment_zero
theorem centralMoment_one' [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (h_int : Integrable X μ) :
centralMoment X 1 μ = (1 - (μ Set.univ).toReal) * μ[X] := by
simp only [centralMoment, Pi.sub_apply, pow_one]
rw [integral_sub h_int (integrable_const _)]
simp only [sub_mul, integral_const, smul_eq_mul, one_mul]
#align probability_theory.central_moment_one' ProbabilityTheory.centralMoment_one'
@[simp]
theorem centralMoment_one [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] : centralMoment X 1 μ = 0 := by
by_cases h_int : Integrable X μ
· rw [centralMoment_one' h_int]
simp only [measure_univ, ENNReal.one_toReal, sub_self, zero_mul]
· simp only [centralMoment, Pi.sub_apply, pow_one]
have : ¬Integrable (fun x => X x - integral μ X) μ := by
refine fun h_sub => h_int ?_
have h_add : X = (fun x => X x - integral μ X) + fun _ => integral μ X := by ext1 x; simp
rw [h_add]
exact h_sub.add (integrable_const _)
rw [integral_undef this]
#align probability_theory.central_moment_one ProbabilityTheory.centralMoment_one
theorem centralMoment_two_eq_variance [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hX : Memℒp X 2 μ) :
centralMoment X 2 μ = variance X μ := by rw [hX.variance_eq]; rfl
#align probability_theory.central_moment_two_eq_variance ProbabilityTheory.centralMoment_two_eq_variance
section MomentGeneratingFunction
variable {t : ℝ}
def mgf (X : Ω → ℝ) (μ : Measure Ω) (t : ℝ) : ℝ :=
μ[fun ω => exp (t * X ω)]
#align probability_theory.mgf ProbabilityTheory.mgf
def cgf (X : Ω → ℝ) (μ : Measure Ω) (t : ℝ) : ℝ :=
log (mgf X μ t)
#align probability_theory.cgf ProbabilityTheory.cgf
@[simp]
theorem mgf_zero_fun : mgf 0 μ t = (μ Set.univ).toReal := by
simp only [mgf, Pi.zero_apply, mul_zero, exp_zero, integral_const, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
#align probability_theory.mgf_zero_fun ProbabilityTheory.mgf_zero_fun
@[simp]
theorem cgf_zero_fun : cgf 0 μ t = log (μ Set.univ).toReal := by simp only [cgf, mgf_zero_fun]
#align probability_theory.cgf_zero_fun ProbabilityTheory.cgf_zero_fun
@[simp]
theorem mgf_zero_measure : mgf X (0 : Measure Ω) t = 0 := by simp only [mgf, integral_zero_measure]
#align probability_theory.mgf_zero_measure ProbabilityTheory.mgf_zero_measure
@[simp]
theorem cgf_zero_measure : cgf X (0 : Measure Ω) t = 0 := by
simp only [cgf, log_zero, mgf_zero_measure]
#align probability_theory.cgf_zero_measure ProbabilityTheory.cgf_zero_measure
@[simp]
theorem mgf_const' (c : ℝ) : mgf (fun _ => c) μ t = (μ Set.univ).toReal * exp (t * c) := by
simp only [mgf, integral_const, smul_eq_mul]
#align probability_theory.mgf_const' ProbabilityTheory.mgf_const'
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: `simp only` already proves this
theorem mgf_const (c : ℝ) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] : mgf (fun _ => c) μ t = exp (t * c) := by
simp only [mgf_const', measure_univ, ENNReal.one_toReal, one_mul]
#align probability_theory.mgf_const ProbabilityTheory.mgf_const
@[simp]
theorem cgf_const' [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (c : ℝ) :
cgf (fun _ => c) μ t = log (μ Set.univ).toReal + t * c := by
simp only [cgf, mgf_const']
rw [log_mul _ (exp_pos _).ne']
· rw [log_exp _]
· rw [Ne, ENNReal.toReal_eq_zero_iff, Measure.measure_univ_eq_zero]
simp only [hμ, measure_ne_top μ Set.univ, or_self_iff, not_false_iff]
#align probability_theory.cgf_const' ProbabilityTheory.cgf_const'
@[simp]
theorem cgf_const [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (c : ℝ) : cgf (fun _ => c) μ t = t * c := by
simp only [cgf, mgf_const, log_exp]
#align probability_theory.cgf_const ProbabilityTheory.cgf_const
@[simp]
theorem mgf_zero' : mgf X μ 0 = (μ Set.univ).toReal := by
simp only [mgf, zero_mul, exp_zero, integral_const, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
#align probability_theory.mgf_zero' ProbabilityTheory.mgf_zero'
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: `simp only` already proves this
theorem mgf_zero [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] : mgf X μ 0 = 1 := by
simp only [mgf_zero', measure_univ, ENNReal.one_toReal]
#align probability_theory.mgf_zero ProbabilityTheory.mgf_zero
@[simp]
theorem cgf_zero' : cgf X μ 0 = log (μ Set.univ).toReal := by simp only [cgf, mgf_zero']
#align probability_theory.cgf_zero' ProbabilityTheory.cgf_zero'
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: `simp only` already proves this
theorem cgf_zero [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] : cgf X μ 0 = 0 := by
simp only [cgf_zero', measure_univ, ENNReal.one_toReal, log_one]
#align probability_theory.cgf_zero ProbabilityTheory.cgf_zero
theorem mgf_undef (hX : ¬Integrable (fun ω => exp (t * X ω)) μ) : mgf X μ t = 0 := by
simp only [mgf, integral_undef hX]
#align probability_theory.mgf_undef ProbabilityTheory.mgf_undef
theorem cgf_undef (hX : ¬Integrable (fun ω => exp (t * X ω)) μ) : cgf X μ t = 0 := by
simp only [cgf, mgf_undef hX, log_zero]
#align probability_theory.cgf_undef ProbabilityTheory.cgf_undef
theorem mgf_nonneg : 0 ≤ mgf X μ t := by
unfold mgf; positivity
#align probability_theory.mgf_nonneg ProbabilityTheory.mgf_nonneg
theorem mgf_pos' (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (h_int_X : Integrable (fun ω => exp (t * X ω)) μ) :
0 < mgf X μ t := by
simp_rw [mgf]
have : ∫ x : Ω, exp (t * X x) ∂μ = ∫ x : Ω in Set.univ, exp (t * X x) ∂μ := by
simp only [Measure.restrict_univ]
rw [this, setIntegral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae _ _]
· have h_eq_univ : (Function.support fun x : Ω => exp (t * X x)) = Set.univ := by
ext1 x
simp only [Function.mem_support, Set.mem_univ, iff_true_iff]
exact (exp_pos _).ne'
rw [h_eq_univ, Set.inter_univ _]
refine Ne.bot_lt ?_
simp only [hμ, ENNReal.bot_eq_zero, Ne, Measure.measure_univ_eq_zero, not_false_iff]
· filter_upwards with x
rw [Pi.zero_apply]
exact (exp_pos _).le
· rwa [integrableOn_univ]
#align probability_theory.mgf_pos' ProbabilityTheory.mgf_pos'
theorem mgf_pos [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (h_int_X : Integrable (fun ω => exp (t * X ω)) μ) :
0 < mgf X μ t :=
mgf_pos' (IsProbabilityMeasure.ne_zero μ) h_int_X
#align probability_theory.mgf_pos ProbabilityTheory.mgf_pos
theorem mgf_neg : mgf (-X) μ t = mgf X μ (-t) := by simp_rw [mgf, Pi.neg_apply, mul_neg, neg_mul]
#align probability_theory.mgf_neg ProbabilityTheory.mgf_neg
theorem cgf_neg : cgf (-X) μ t = cgf X μ (-t) := by simp_rw [cgf, mgf_neg]
#align probability_theory.cgf_neg ProbabilityTheory.cgf_neg
theorem IndepFun.exp_mul {X Y : Ω → ℝ} (h_indep : IndepFun X Y μ) (s t : ℝ) :
IndepFun (fun ω => exp (s * X ω)) (fun ω => exp (t * Y ω)) μ := by
have h_meas : ∀ t, Measurable fun x => exp (t * x) := fun t => (measurable_id'.const_mul t).exp
change IndepFun ((fun x => exp (s * x)) ∘ X) ((fun x => exp (t * x)) ∘ Y) μ
exact IndepFun.comp h_indep (h_meas s) (h_meas t)
#align probability_theory.indep_fun.exp_mul ProbabilityTheory.IndepFun.exp_mul
theorem IndepFun.mgf_add {X Y : Ω → ℝ} (h_indep : IndepFun X Y μ)
(hX : AEStronglyMeasurable (fun ω => exp (t * X ω)) μ)
(hY : AEStronglyMeasurable (fun ω => exp (t * Y ω)) μ) :
mgf (X + Y) μ t = mgf X μ t * mgf Y μ t := by
simp_rw [mgf, Pi.add_apply, mul_add, exp_add]
exact (h_indep.exp_mul t t).integral_mul hX hY
#align probability_theory.indep_fun.mgf_add ProbabilityTheory.IndepFun.mgf_add
theorem IndepFun.mgf_add' {X Y : Ω → ℝ} (h_indep : IndepFun X Y μ) (hX : AEStronglyMeasurable X μ)
(hY : AEStronglyMeasurable Y μ) : mgf (X + Y) μ t = mgf X μ t * mgf Y μ t := by
have A : Continuous fun x : ℝ => exp (t * x) := by fun_prop
have h'X : AEStronglyMeasurable (fun ω => exp (t * X ω)) μ :=
A.aestronglyMeasurable.comp_aemeasurable hX.aemeasurable
have h'Y : AEStronglyMeasurable (fun ω => exp (t * Y ω)) μ :=
A.aestronglyMeasurable.comp_aemeasurable hY.aemeasurable
exact h_indep.mgf_add h'X h'Y
#align probability_theory.indep_fun.mgf_add' ProbabilityTheory.IndepFun.mgf_add'
theorem IndepFun.cgf_add {X Y : Ω → ℝ} (h_indep : IndepFun X Y μ)
(h_int_X : Integrable (fun ω => exp (t * X ω)) μ)
(h_int_Y : Integrable (fun ω => exp (t * Y ω)) μ) :
cgf (X + Y) μ t = cgf X μ t + cgf Y μ t := by
by_cases hμ : μ = 0
· simp [hμ]
simp only [cgf, h_indep.mgf_add h_int_X.aestronglyMeasurable h_int_Y.aestronglyMeasurable]
exact log_mul (mgf_pos' hμ h_int_X).ne' (mgf_pos' hμ h_int_Y).ne'
#align probability_theory.indep_fun.cgf_add ProbabilityTheory.IndepFun.cgf_add
theorem aestronglyMeasurable_exp_mul_add {X Y : Ω → ℝ}
(h_int_X : AEStronglyMeasurable (fun ω => exp (t * X ω)) μ)
(h_int_Y : AEStronglyMeasurable (fun ω => exp (t * Y ω)) μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun ω => exp (t * (X + Y) ω)) μ := by
simp_rw [Pi.add_apply, mul_add, exp_add]
exact AEStronglyMeasurable.mul h_int_X h_int_Y
#align probability_theory.ae_strongly_measurable_exp_mul_add ProbabilityTheory.aestronglyMeasurable_exp_mul_add
theorem aestronglyMeasurable_exp_mul_sum {X : ι → Ω → ℝ} {s : Finset ι}
(h_int : ∀ i ∈ s, AEStronglyMeasurable (fun ω => exp (t * X i ω)) μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun ω => exp (t * (∑ i ∈ s, X i) ω)) μ := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with i s hi_notin_s h_rec h_int
· simp only [Pi.zero_apply, sum_apply, sum_empty, mul_zero, exp_zero]
exact aestronglyMeasurable_const
· have : ∀ i : ι, i ∈ s → AEStronglyMeasurable (fun ω : Ω => exp (t * X i ω)) μ := fun i hi =>
h_int i (mem_insert_of_mem hi)
specialize h_rec this
rw [sum_insert hi_notin_s]
apply aestronglyMeasurable_exp_mul_add (h_int i (mem_insert_self _ _)) h_rec
#align probability_theory.ae_strongly_measurable_exp_mul_sum ProbabilityTheory.aestronglyMeasurable_exp_mul_sum
theorem IndepFun.integrable_exp_mul_add {X Y : Ω → ℝ} (h_indep : IndepFun X Y μ)
(h_int_X : Integrable (fun ω => exp (t * X ω)) μ)
(h_int_Y : Integrable (fun ω => exp (t * Y ω)) μ) :
Integrable (fun ω => exp (t * (X + Y) ω)) μ := by
simp_rw [Pi.add_apply, mul_add, exp_add]
exact (h_indep.exp_mul t t).integrable_mul h_int_X h_int_Y
#align probability_theory.indep_fun.integrable_exp_mul_add ProbabilityTheory.IndepFun.integrable_exp_mul_add
theorem iIndepFun.integrable_exp_mul_sum [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] {X : ι → Ω → ℝ}
(h_indep : iIndepFun (fun i => inferInstance) X μ) (h_meas : ∀ i, Measurable (X i))
{s : Finset ι} (h_int : ∀ i ∈ s, Integrable (fun ω => exp (t * X i ω)) μ) :
Integrable (fun ω => exp (t * (∑ i ∈ s, X i) ω)) μ := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with i s hi_notin_s h_rec h_int
· simp only [Pi.zero_apply, sum_apply, sum_empty, mul_zero, exp_zero]
exact integrable_const _
· have : ∀ i : ι, i ∈ s → Integrable (fun ω : Ω => exp (t * X i ω)) μ := fun i hi =>
h_int i (mem_insert_of_mem hi)
specialize h_rec this
rw [sum_insert hi_notin_s]
refine IndepFun.integrable_exp_mul_add ?_ (h_int i (mem_insert_self _ _)) h_rec
exact (h_indep.indepFun_finset_sum_of_not_mem h_meas hi_notin_s).symm
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align probability_theory.Indep_fun.integrable_exp_mul_sum ProbabilityTheory.iIndepFun.integrable_exp_mul_sum
theorem iIndepFun.mgf_sum [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] {X : ι → Ω → ℝ}
(h_indep : iIndepFun (fun i => inferInstance) X μ) (h_meas : ∀ i, Measurable (X i))
(s : Finset ι) : mgf (∑ i ∈ s, X i) μ t = ∏ i ∈ s, mgf (X i) μ t := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with i s hi_notin_s h_rec h_int
· simp only [sum_empty, mgf_zero_fun, measure_univ, ENNReal.one_toReal, prod_empty]
· have h_int' : ∀ i : ι, AEStronglyMeasurable (fun ω : Ω => exp (t * X i ω)) μ := fun i =>
((h_meas i).const_mul t).exp.aestronglyMeasurable
rw [sum_insert hi_notin_s,
IndepFun.mgf_add (h_indep.indepFun_finset_sum_of_not_mem h_meas hi_notin_s).symm (h_int' i)
(aestronglyMeasurable_exp_mul_sum fun i _ => h_int' i),
h_rec, prod_insert hi_notin_s]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align probability_theory.Indep_fun.mgf_sum ProbabilityTheory.iIndepFun.mgf_sum
| Mathlib/Probability/Moments.lean | 314 | 321 | theorem iIndepFun.cgf_sum [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] {X : ι → Ω → ℝ}
(h_indep : iIndepFun (fun i => inferInstance) X μ) (h_meas : ∀ i, Measurable (X i))
{s : Finset ι} (h_int : ∀ i ∈ s, Integrable (fun ω => exp (t * X i ω)) μ) :
cgf (∑ i ∈ s, X i) μ t = ∑ i ∈ s, cgf (X i) μ t := by |
simp_rw [cgf]
rw [← log_prod _ _ fun j hj => ?_]
· rw [h_indep.mgf_sum h_meas]
· exact (mgf_pos (h_int j hj)).ne'
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.TwoDim
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Basic
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.oriented.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0c8bf9245297a541f468be517f1bde6195105e9"
noncomputable section
open FiniteDimensional Complex
open scoped Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace Orientation
attribute [local instance] Complex.finrank_real_complex_fact
variable {V V' : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedAddCommGroup V']
variable [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V']
variable [Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Fact (finrank ℝ V' = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
local notation "ω" => o.areaForm
def oangle (x y : V) : Real.Angle :=
Complex.arg (o.kahler x y)
#align orientation.oangle Orientation.oangle
theorem continuousAt_oangle {x : V × V} (hx1 : x.1 ≠ 0) (hx2 : x.2 ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : V × V => o.oangle y.1 y.2) x := by
refine (Complex.continuousAt_arg_coe_angle ?_).comp ?_
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx1 hx2
exact ((continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_inner).add
((continuous_ofReal.comp o.areaForm'.continuous₂).mul continuous_const)).continuousAt
#align orientation.continuous_at_oangle Orientation.continuousAt_oangle
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_left (x : V) : o.oangle 0 x = 0 := by simp [oangle]
#align orientation.oangle_zero_left Orientation.oangle_zero_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_right (x : V) : o.oangle x 0 = 0 := by simp [oangle]
#align orientation.oangle_zero_right Orientation.oangle_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self (x : V) : o.oangle x x = 0 := by
rw [oangle, kahler_apply_self, ← ofReal_pow]
convert QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero (AddSubgroup.zmultiples (2 * π))
apply arg_ofReal_of_nonneg
positivity
#align orientation.oangle_self Orientation.oangle_self
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : y ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero
theorem ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ y := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero Orientation.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi Orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two Orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero Orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one Orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one Orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
theorem oangle_rev (x y : V) : o.oangle y x = -o.oangle x y := by
simp only [oangle, o.kahler_swap y x, Complex.arg_conj_coe_angle]
#align orientation.oangle_rev Orientation.oangle_rev
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev (x y : V) : o.oangle x y + o.oangle y x = 0 := by
simp [o.oangle_rev y x]
#align orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev Orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev
theorem oangle_neg_left {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle (-x) y = o.oangle x y + π := by
simp only [oangle, map_neg]
convert Complex.arg_neg_coe_angle _
exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
#align orientation.oangle_neg_left Orientation.oangle_neg_left
theorem oangle_neg_right {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x (-y) = o.oangle x y + π := by
simp only [oangle, map_neg]
convert Complex.arg_neg_coe_angle _
exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
#align orientation.oangle_neg_right Orientation.oangle_neg_right
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_left (x y : V) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (-x) y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
· simp [o.oangle_neg_left hx hy]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_left Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_left
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_right (x y : V) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (-y) = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
· simp [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_right Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_neg (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) (-y) = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle]
#align orientation.oangle_neg_neg Orientation.oangle_neg_neg
theorem oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) y = o.oangle x (-y) := by
rw [← neg_neg y, oangle_neg_neg, neg_neg]
#align orientation.oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right Orientation.oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_self_left {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : o.oangle (-x) x = π := by
simp [oangle_neg_left, hx]
#align orientation.oangle_neg_self_left Orientation.oangle_neg_self_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_self_right {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : o.oangle x (-x) = π := by
simp [oangle_neg_right, hx]
#align orientation.oangle_neg_self_right Orientation.oangle_neg_self_right
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_left (x : V) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (-x) x = 0 := by
by_cases hx : x = 0 <;> simp [hx]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_left Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_left
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_right (x : V) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (-x) = 0 := by
by_cases hx : x = 0 <;> simp [hx]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_right Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_left (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) y + o.oangle (-y) x = 0 := by
rw [oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, oangle_rev, add_left_neg]
#align orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_left Orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_right (x y : V) : o.oangle x (-y) + o.oangle y (-x) = 0 := by
rw [o.oangle_rev (-x), oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, add_neg_self]
#align orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_right Orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_of_pos (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
o.oangle (r • x) y = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle, Complex.arg_real_mul _ hr]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_left_of_pos Orientation.oangle_smul_left_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_of_pos (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
o.oangle x (r • y) = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle, Complex.arg_real_mul _ hr]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_right_of_pos Orientation.oangle_smul_right_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_of_neg (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
o.oangle (r • x) y = o.oangle (-x) y := by
rw [← neg_neg r, neg_smul, ← smul_neg, o.oangle_smul_left_of_pos _ _ (neg_pos_of_neg hr)]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_left_of_neg Orientation.oangle_smul_left_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_of_neg (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
o.oangle x (r • y) = o.oangle x (-y) := by
rw [← neg_neg r, neg_smul, ← smul_neg, o.oangle_smul_right_of_pos _ _ (neg_pos_of_neg hr)]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_right_of_neg Orientation.oangle_smul_right_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) : o.oangle (r • x) x = 0 := by
rcases hr.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h]
· simp [h.symm]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_left_self_of_nonneg Orientation.oangle_smul_left_self_of_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) : o.oangle x (r • x) = 0 := by
rcases hr.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h]
· simp [h.symm]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_right_self_of_nonneg Orientation.oangle_smul_right_self_of_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_smul_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (hr₁ : 0 ≤ r₁) (hr₂ : 0 ≤ r₂) :
o.oangle (r₁ • x) (r₂ • x) = 0 := by
rcases hr₁.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h, hr₂]
· simp [h.symm]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_smul_self_of_nonneg Orientation.oangle_smul_smul_self_of_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r • x) y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
rcases hr.lt_or_lt with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (r • y) = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
rcases hr.lt_or_lt with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_self (x : V) {r : ℝ} : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r • x) x = 0 := by
rcases lt_or_le r 0 with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_self Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_self
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_self (x : V) {r : ℝ} : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (r • x) = 0 := by
rcases lt_or_le r 0 with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_self Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_self
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_smul_self (x : V) {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r₁ • x) (r₂ • x) = 0 := by by_cases h : r₁ = 0 <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_smul_self Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_smul_self
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq {x y : V} (z : V) (h : (ℝ ∙ x) = ℝ ∙ y) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle y z := by
rw [Submodule.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton] at h
rcases h with ⟨r, rfl⟩
exact (o.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero _ _ (Units.ne_zero _)).symm
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq (x : V) {y z : V} (h : (ℝ ∙ y) = ℝ ∙ z) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z := by
rw [Submodule.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton] at h
rcases h with ⟨r, rfl⟩
exact (o.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero _ _ (Units.ne_zero _)).symm
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_of_span_eq_of_span_eq {w x y z : V} (hwx : (ℝ ∙ w) = ℝ ∙ x)
(hyz : (ℝ ∙ y) = ℝ ∙ z) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle w y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z := by
rw [o.two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq y hwx, o.two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq x hyz]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_of_span_eq_of_span_eq Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_of_span_eq_of_span_eq
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = 0 ↔ o.oangle y x = 0 := by
rw [oangle_rev, neg_eq_zero]
#align orientation.oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero Orientation.oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = 0 ↔ SameRay ℝ x y := by
rw [oangle, kahler_apply_apply, Complex.arg_coe_angle_eq_iff_eq_toReal, Real.Angle.toReal_zero,
Complex.arg_eq_zero_iff]
simpa using o.nonneg_inner_and_areaForm_eq_zero_iff_sameRay x y
#align orientation.oangle_eq_zero_iff_same_ray Orientation.oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = π ↔ o.oangle y x = π := by
rw [oangle_rev, neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, Real.Angle.neg_coe_pi]
#align orientation.oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi Orientation.oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = π ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 ∧ SameRay ℝ x (-y) := by
rw [← o.oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay]
constructor
· intro h
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx, Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero.symm] at h
by_cases hy : y = 0; · simp [hy, Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero.symm] at h
refine ⟨hx, hy, ?_⟩
rw [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy, h, Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi]
· rintro ⟨hx, hy, h⟩
rwa [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy, ← Real.Angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi, sub_eq_zero] at h
#align orientation.oangle_eq_pi_iff_same_ray_neg Orientation.oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg
theorem oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linearIndependent {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = 0 ∨ o.oangle x y = π ↔ ¬LinearIndependent ℝ ![x, y] := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay, oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg,
sameRay_or_ne_zero_and_sameRay_neg_iff_not_linearIndependent]
#align orientation.oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linear_independent Orientation.oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linearIndependent
theorem oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_right_eq_smul {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = 0 ∨ o.oangle x y = π ↔ x = 0 ∨ ∃ r : ℝ, y = r • x := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay, oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rcases h with (h | ⟨-, -, h⟩)
· by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
obtain ⟨r, -, rfl⟩ := h.exists_nonneg_left hx
exact Or.inr ⟨r, rfl⟩
· by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
obtain ⟨r, -, hy⟩ := h.exists_nonneg_left hx
refine Or.inr ⟨-r, ?_⟩
simp [hy]
· rcases h with (rfl | ⟨r, rfl⟩); · simp
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
rcases lt_trichotomy r 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [← neg_smul]
exact Or.inr ⟨hx, smul_ne_zero hr.ne hx,
SameRay.sameRay_pos_smul_right x (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr)⟩
· simp [hr]
· exact Or.inl (SameRay.sameRay_pos_smul_right x hr)
#align orientation.oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_right_eq_smul Orientation.oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_right_eq_smul
theorem oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_linearIndependent {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y ≠ 0 ∧ o.oangle x y ≠ π ↔ LinearIndependent ℝ ![x, y] := by
rw [← not_or, ← not_iff_not, Classical.not_not,
oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linearIndependent]
#align orientation.oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_linear_independent Orientation.oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_linearIndependent
theorem eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero (x y : V) : x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ ∧ o.oangle x y = 0 := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay]
constructor
· rintro rfl
simp; rfl
· rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with (rfl | hy)
· simp
rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
obtain ⟨r, hr, rfl⟩ := h₂.exists_nonneg_right hy
have : ‖y‖ ≠ 0 := by simpa using hy
obtain rfl : r = 1 := by
apply mul_right_cancel₀ this
simpa [norm_smul, _root_.abs_of_nonneg hr] using h₁
simp
#align orientation.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero Orientation.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero
theorem eq_iff_oangle_eq_zero_of_norm_eq {x y : V} (h : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) : x = y ↔ o.oangle x y = 0 :=
⟨fun he => ((o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).1 he).2, fun ha =>
(o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).2 ⟨h, ha⟩⟩
#align orientation.eq_iff_oangle_eq_zero_of_norm_eq Orientation.eq_iff_oangle_eq_zero_of_norm_eq
theorem eq_iff_norm_eq_of_oangle_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = 0) : x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ :=
⟨fun he => ((o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).1 he).1, fun hn =>
(o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).2 ⟨hn, h⟩⟩
#align orientation.eq_iff_norm_eq_of_oangle_eq_zero Orientation.eq_iff_norm_eq_of_oangle_eq_zero
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Basic.lean | 509 | 519 | theorem oangle_add {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x y + o.oangle y z = o.oangle x z := by |
simp_rw [oangle]
rw [← Complex.arg_mul_coe_angle, o.kahler_mul y x z]
· congr 1
convert Complex.arg_real_mul _ (_ : 0 < ‖y‖ ^ 2) using 2
· norm_cast
· have : 0 < ‖y‖ := by simpa using hy
positivity
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hy hz
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Hall.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Finite
#align_import combinatorics.configuration from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d2d8742b0c21426362a9dacebc6005db895ca963"
open Finset
namespace Configuration
variable (P L : Type*) [Membership P L]
def Dual :=
P
#align configuration.dual Configuration.Dual
-- Porting note: was `this` instead of `h`
instance [h : Inhabited P] : Inhabited (Dual P) :=
h
instance [Finite P] : Finite (Dual P) :=
‹Finite P›
-- Porting note: was `this` instead of `h`
instance [h : Fintype P] : Fintype (Dual P) :=
h
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: figure out if this is needed.
set_option synthInstance.checkSynthOrder false in
instance : Membership (Dual L) (Dual P) :=
⟨Function.swap (Membership.mem : P → L → Prop)⟩
class Nondegenerate : Prop where
exists_point : ∀ l : L, ∃ p, p ∉ l
exists_line : ∀ p, ∃ l : L, p ∉ l
eq_or_eq : ∀ {p₁ p₂ : P} {l₁ l₂ : L}, p₁ ∈ l₁ → p₂ ∈ l₁ → p₁ ∈ l₂ → p₂ ∈ l₂ → p₁ = p₂ ∨ l₁ = l₂
#align configuration.nondegenerate Configuration.Nondegenerate
class HasPoints extends Nondegenerate P L where
mkPoint : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : L}, l₁ ≠ l₂ → P
mkPoint_ax : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : L} (h : l₁ ≠ l₂), mkPoint h ∈ l₁ ∧ mkPoint h ∈ l₂
#align configuration.has_points Configuration.HasPoints
class HasLines extends Nondegenerate P L where
mkLine : ∀ {p₁ p₂ : P}, p₁ ≠ p₂ → L
mkLine_ax : ∀ {p₁ p₂ : P} (h : p₁ ≠ p₂), p₁ ∈ mkLine h ∧ p₂ ∈ mkLine h
#align configuration.has_lines Configuration.HasLines
open Nondegenerate
open HasPoints (mkPoint mkPoint_ax)
open HasLines (mkLine mkLine_ax)
instance Dual.Nondegenerate [Nondegenerate P L] : Nondegenerate (Dual L) (Dual P) where
exists_point := @exists_line P L _ _
exists_line := @exists_point P L _ _
eq_or_eq := @fun l₁ l₂ p₁ p₂ h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ => (@eq_or_eq P L _ _ p₁ p₂ l₁ l₂ h₁ h₃ h₂ h₄).symm
instance Dual.hasLines [HasPoints P L] : HasLines (Dual L) (Dual P) :=
{ Dual.Nondegenerate _ _ with
mkLine := @mkPoint P L _ _
mkLine_ax := @mkPoint_ax P L _ _ }
instance Dual.hasPoints [HasLines P L] : HasPoints (Dual L) (Dual P) :=
{ Dual.Nondegenerate _ _ with
mkPoint := @mkLine P L _ _
mkPoint_ax := @mkLine_ax P L _ _ }
theorem HasPoints.existsUnique_point [HasPoints P L] (l₁ l₂ : L) (hl : l₁ ≠ l₂) :
∃! p, p ∈ l₁ ∧ p ∈ l₂ :=
⟨mkPoint hl, mkPoint_ax hl, fun _ hp =>
(eq_or_eq hp.1 (mkPoint_ax hl).1 hp.2 (mkPoint_ax hl).2).resolve_right hl⟩
#align configuration.has_points.exists_unique_point Configuration.HasPoints.existsUnique_point
theorem HasLines.existsUnique_line [HasLines P L] (p₁ p₂ : P) (hp : p₁ ≠ p₂) :
∃! l : L, p₁ ∈ l ∧ p₂ ∈ l :=
HasPoints.existsUnique_point (Dual L) (Dual P) p₁ p₂ hp
#align configuration.has_lines.exists_unique_line Configuration.HasLines.existsUnique_line
variable {P L}
theorem Nondegenerate.exists_injective_of_card_le [Nondegenerate P L] [Fintype P] [Fintype L]
(h : Fintype.card L ≤ Fintype.card P) : ∃ f : L → P, Function.Injective f ∧ ∀ l, f l ∉ l := by
classical
let t : L → Finset P := fun l => Set.toFinset { p | p ∉ l }
suffices ∀ s : Finset L, s.card ≤ (s.biUnion t).card by
-- Hall's marriage theorem
obtain ⟨f, hf1, hf2⟩ := (Finset.all_card_le_biUnion_card_iff_exists_injective t).mp this
exact ⟨f, hf1, fun l => Set.mem_toFinset.mp (hf2 l)⟩
intro s
by_cases hs₀ : s.card = 0
-- If `s = ∅`, then `s.card = 0 ≤ (s.bUnion t).card`
· simp_rw [hs₀, zero_le]
by_cases hs₁ : s.card = 1
-- If `s = {l}`, then pick a point `p ∉ l`
· obtain ⟨l, rfl⟩ := Finset.card_eq_one.mp hs₁
obtain ⟨p, hl⟩ := exists_point l
rw [Finset.card_singleton, Finset.singleton_biUnion, Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
exact Finset.card_ne_zero_of_mem (Set.mem_toFinset.mpr hl)
suffices (s.biUnion t)ᶜ.card ≤ sᶜ.card by
-- Rephrase in terms of complements (uses `h`)
rw [Finset.card_compl, Finset.card_compl, tsub_le_iff_left] at this
replace := h.trans this
rwa [← add_tsub_assoc_of_le s.card_le_univ, le_tsub_iff_left (le_add_left s.card_le_univ),
add_le_add_iff_right] at this
have hs₂ : (s.biUnion t)ᶜ.card ≤ 1 := by
-- At most one line through two points of `s`
refine Finset.card_le_one_iff.mpr @fun p₁ p₂ hp₁ hp₂ => ?_
simp_rw [t, Finset.mem_compl, Finset.mem_biUnion, not_exists, not_and,
Set.mem_toFinset, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Classical.not_not] at hp₁ hp₂
obtain ⟨l₁, l₂, hl₁, hl₂, hl₃⟩ :=
Finset.one_lt_card_iff.mp (Nat.one_lt_iff_ne_zero_and_ne_one.mpr ⟨hs₀, hs₁⟩)
exact (eq_or_eq (hp₁ l₁ hl₁) (hp₂ l₁ hl₁) (hp₁ l₂ hl₂) (hp₂ l₂ hl₂)).resolve_right hl₃
by_cases hs₃ : sᶜ.card = 0
· rw [hs₃, Nat.le_zero]
rw [Finset.card_compl, tsub_eq_zero_iff_le, LE.le.le_iff_eq (Finset.card_le_univ _), eq_comm,
Finset.card_eq_iff_eq_univ] at hs₃ ⊢
rw [hs₃]
rw [Finset.eq_univ_iff_forall] at hs₃ ⊢
exact fun p =>
Exists.elim (exists_line p)-- If `s = univ`, then show `s.bUnion t = univ`
fun l hl => Finset.mem_biUnion.mpr ⟨l, Finset.mem_univ l, Set.mem_toFinset.mpr hl⟩
· exact hs₂.trans (Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr hs₃)
#align configuration.nondegenerate.exists_injective_of_card_le Configuration.Nondegenerate.exists_injective_of_card_le
-- If `s < univ`, then consequence of `hs₂`
variable (L)
noncomputable def lineCount (p : P) : ℕ :=
Nat.card { l : L // p ∈ l }
#align configuration.line_count Configuration.lineCount
variable (P) {L}
noncomputable def pointCount (l : L) : ℕ :=
Nat.card { p : P // p ∈ l }
#align configuration.point_count Configuration.pointCount
variable (L)
theorem sum_lineCount_eq_sum_pointCount [Fintype P] [Fintype L] :
∑ p : P, lineCount L p = ∑ l : L, pointCount P l := by
classical
simp only [lineCount, pointCount, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, ← Fintype.card_sigma]
apply Fintype.card_congr
calc
(Σp, { l : L // p ∈ l }) ≃ { x : P × L // x.1 ∈ x.2 } :=
(Equiv.subtypeProdEquivSigmaSubtype (· ∈ ·)).symm
_ ≃ { x : L × P // x.2 ∈ x.1 } := (Equiv.prodComm P L).subtypeEquiv fun x => Iff.rfl
_ ≃ Σl, { p // p ∈ l } := Equiv.subtypeProdEquivSigmaSubtype fun (l : L) (p : P) => p ∈ l
#align configuration.sum_line_count_eq_sum_point_count Configuration.sum_lineCount_eq_sum_pointCount
variable {P L}
theorem HasLines.pointCount_le_lineCount [HasLines P L] {p : P} {l : L} (h : p ∉ l)
[Finite { l : L // p ∈ l }] : pointCount P l ≤ lineCount L p := by
by_cases hf : Infinite { p : P // p ∈ l }
· exact (le_of_eq Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite).trans (zero_le (lineCount L p))
haveI := fintypeOfNotInfinite hf
cases nonempty_fintype { l : L // p ∈ l }
rw [lineCount, pointCount, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card]
have : ∀ p' : { p // p ∈ l }, p ≠ p' := fun p' hp' => h ((congr_arg (· ∈ l) hp').mpr p'.2)
exact
Fintype.card_le_of_injective (fun p' => ⟨mkLine (this p'), (mkLine_ax (this p')).1⟩)
fun p₁ p₂ hp =>
Subtype.ext
((eq_or_eq p₁.2 p₂.2 (mkLine_ax (this p₁)).2
((congr_arg _ (Subtype.ext_iff.mp hp)).mpr (mkLine_ax (this p₂)).2)).resolve_right
fun h' => (congr_arg (¬p ∈ ·) h').mp h (mkLine_ax (this p₁)).1)
#align configuration.has_lines.point_count_le_line_count Configuration.HasLines.pointCount_le_lineCount
theorem HasPoints.lineCount_le_pointCount [HasPoints P L] {p : P} {l : L} (h : p ∉ l)
[hf : Finite { p : P // p ∈ l }] : lineCount L p ≤ pointCount P l :=
@HasLines.pointCount_le_lineCount (Dual L) (Dual P) _ _ l p h hf
#align configuration.has_points.line_count_le_point_count Configuration.HasPoints.lineCount_le_pointCount
variable (P L)
theorem HasLines.card_le [HasLines P L] [Fintype P] [Fintype L] :
Fintype.card P ≤ Fintype.card L := by
classical
by_contra hc₂
obtain ⟨f, hf₁, hf₂⟩ := Nondegenerate.exists_injective_of_card_le (le_of_not_le hc₂)
have :=
calc
∑ p, lineCount L p = ∑ l, pointCount P l := sum_lineCount_eq_sum_pointCount P L
_ ≤ ∑ l, lineCount L (f l) :=
(Finset.sum_le_sum fun l _ => HasLines.pointCount_le_lineCount (hf₂ l))
_ = ∑ p ∈ univ.map ⟨f, hf₁⟩, lineCount L p := by rw [sum_map]; dsimp
_ < ∑ p, lineCount L p := by
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := not_forall.mp (mt (Fintype.card_le_of_surjective f) hc₂)
refine sum_lt_sum_of_subset (subset_univ _) (mem_univ p) ?_ ?_ fun p _ _ ↦ zero_le _
· simpa only [Finset.mem_map, exists_prop, Finset.mem_univ, true_and_iff]
· rw [lineCount, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.card_pos_iff]
obtain ⟨l, _⟩ := @exists_line P L _ _ p
exact
let this := not_exists.mp hp l
⟨⟨mkLine this, (mkLine_ax this).2⟩⟩
exact lt_irrefl _ this
#align configuration.has_lines.card_le Configuration.HasLines.card_le
theorem HasPoints.card_le [HasPoints P L] [Fintype P] [Fintype L] :
Fintype.card L ≤ Fintype.card P :=
@HasLines.card_le (Dual L) (Dual P) _ _ _ _
#align configuration.has_points.card_le Configuration.HasPoints.card_le
variable {P L}
theorem HasLines.exists_bijective_of_card_eq [HasLines P L] [Fintype P] [Fintype L]
(h : Fintype.card P = Fintype.card L) :
∃ f : L → P, Function.Bijective f ∧ ∀ l, pointCount P l = lineCount L (f l) := by
classical
obtain ⟨f, hf1, hf2⟩ := Nondegenerate.exists_injective_of_card_le (ge_of_eq h)
have hf3 := (Fintype.bijective_iff_injective_and_card f).mpr ⟨hf1, h.symm⟩
exact ⟨f, hf3, fun l ↦ (sum_eq_sum_iff_of_le fun l _ ↦ pointCount_le_lineCount (hf2 l)).1
((hf3.sum_comp _).trans (sum_lineCount_eq_sum_pointCount P L)).symm _ <| mem_univ _⟩
#align configuration.has_lines.exists_bijective_of_card_eq Configuration.HasLines.exists_bijective_of_card_eq
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Configuration.lean | 266 | 290 | theorem HasLines.lineCount_eq_pointCount [HasLines P L] [Fintype P] [Fintype L]
(hPL : Fintype.card P = Fintype.card L) {p : P} {l : L} (hpl : p ∉ l) :
lineCount L p = pointCount P l := by |
classical
obtain ⟨f, hf1, hf2⟩ := HasLines.exists_bijective_of_card_eq hPL
let s : Finset (P × L) := Set.toFinset { i | i.1 ∈ i.2 }
have step1 : ∑ i : P × L, lineCount L i.1 = ∑ i : P × L, pointCount P i.2 := by
rw [← Finset.univ_product_univ, Finset.sum_product_right, Finset.sum_product]
simp_rw [Finset.sum_const, Finset.card_univ, hPL, sum_lineCount_eq_sum_pointCount]
have step2 : ∑ i ∈ s, lineCount L i.1 = ∑ i ∈ s, pointCount P i.2 := by
rw [s.sum_finset_product Finset.univ fun p => Set.toFinset { l | p ∈ l }]
on_goal 1 =>
rw [s.sum_finset_product_right Finset.univ fun l => Set.toFinset { p | p ∈ l }, eq_comm]
· refine sum_bijective _ hf1 (by simp) fun l _ ↦ ?_
simp_rw [hf2, sum_const, Set.toFinset_card, ← Nat.card_eq_fintype_card]
change pointCount P l • _ = lineCount L (f l) • _
rw [hf2]
all_goals simp_rw [s, Finset.mem_univ, true_and_iff, Set.mem_toFinset]; exact fun p => Iff.rfl
have step3 : ∑ i ∈ sᶜ, lineCount L i.1 = ∑ i ∈ sᶜ, pointCount P i.2 := by
rwa [← s.sum_add_sum_compl, ← s.sum_add_sum_compl, step2, add_left_cancel_iff] at step1
rw [← Set.toFinset_compl] at step3
exact
((Finset.sum_eq_sum_iff_of_le fun i hi =>
HasLines.pointCount_le_lineCount (by exact Set.mem_toFinset.mp hi)).mp
step3.symm (p, l) (Set.mem_toFinset.mpr hpl)).symm
|
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Basic
#align_import model_theory.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"369525b73f229ccd76a6ec0e0e0bf2be57599768"
set_option autoImplicit true
universe u v u' v' w w'
open Cardinal
open Cardinal
namespace FirstOrder
-- intended to be used with explicit universe parameters
@[nolint checkUnivs]
structure Language where
Functions : ℕ → Type u
Relations : ℕ → Type v
#align first_order.language FirstOrder.Language
--@[simp]
def Sequence₂ (a₀ a₁ a₂ : Type u) : ℕ → Type u
| 0 => a₀
| 1 => a₁
| 2 => a₂
| _ => PEmpty
#align first_order.sequence₂ FirstOrder.Sequence₂
namespace Language
@[simps]
protected def mk₂ (c f₁ f₂ : Type u) (r₁ r₂ : Type v) : Language :=
⟨Sequence₂ c f₁ f₂, Sequence₂ PEmpty r₁ r₂⟩
#align first_order.language.mk₂ FirstOrder.Language.mk₂
protected def empty : Language :=
⟨fun _ => Empty, fun _ => Empty⟩
#align first_order.language.empty FirstOrder.Language.empty
instance : Inhabited Language :=
⟨Language.empty⟩
protected def sum (L : Language.{u, v}) (L' : Language.{u', v'}) : Language :=
⟨fun n => Sum (L.Functions n) (L'.Functions n), fun n => Sum (L.Relations n) (L'.Relations n)⟩
#align first_order.language.sum FirstOrder.Language.sum
variable (L : Language.{u, v})
-- Porting note(#5171): this linter isn't ported yet.
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
protected def Constants :=
L.Functions 0
#align first_order.language.constants FirstOrder.Language.Constants
@[simp]
theorem constants_mk₂ (c f₁ f₂ : Type u) (r₁ r₂ : Type v) :
(Language.mk₂ c f₁ f₂ r₁ r₂).Constants = c :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.constants_mk₂ FirstOrder.Language.constants_mk₂
-- Porting note(#5171): this linter isn't ported yet.
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
def Symbols :=
Sum (Σl, L.Functions l) (Σl, L.Relations l)
#align first_order.language.symbols FirstOrder.Language.Symbols
def card : Cardinal :=
#L.Symbols
#align first_order.language.card FirstOrder.Language.card
class IsRelational : Prop where
empty_functions : ∀ n, IsEmpty (L.Functions n)
#align first_order.language.is_relational FirstOrder.Language.IsRelational
class IsAlgebraic : Prop where
empty_relations : ∀ n, IsEmpty (L.Relations n)
#align first_order.language.is_algebraic FirstOrder.Language.IsAlgebraic
variable {L} {L' : Language.{u', v'}}
| Mathlib/ModelTheory/Basic.lean | 174 | 178 | theorem card_eq_card_functions_add_card_relations :
L.card =
(Cardinal.sum fun l => Cardinal.lift.{v} #(L.Functions l)) +
Cardinal.sum fun l => Cardinal.lift.{u} #(L.Relations l) := by |
simp [card, Symbols]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Hull
#align_import analysis.convex.join from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"951bf1d9e98a2042979ced62c0620bcfb3587cf8"
open Set
variable {ι : Sort*} {𝕜 E : Type*}
section OrderedSemiring
variable (𝕜) [OrderedSemiring 𝕜] [AddCommMonoid E] [Module 𝕜 E] {s t s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ u : Set E}
{x y : E}
def convexJoin (s t : Set E) : Set E :=
⋃ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ t), segment 𝕜 x y
#align convex_join convexJoin
variable {𝕜}
theorem mem_convexJoin : x ∈ convexJoin 𝕜 s t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, x ∈ segment 𝕜 a b := by
simp [convexJoin]
#align mem_convex_join mem_convexJoin
theorem convexJoin_comm (s t : Set E) : convexJoin 𝕜 s t = convexJoin 𝕜 t s :=
(iUnion₂_comm _).trans <| by simp_rw [convexJoin, segment_symm]
#align convex_join_comm convexJoin_comm
theorem convexJoin_mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : convexJoin 𝕜 s₁ t₁ ⊆ convexJoin 𝕜 s₂ t₂ :=
biUnion_mono hs fun _ _ => biUnion_subset_biUnion_left ht
#align convex_join_mono convexJoin_mono
theorem convexJoin_mono_left (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : convexJoin 𝕜 s₁ t ⊆ convexJoin 𝕜 s₂ t :=
convexJoin_mono hs Subset.rfl
#align convex_join_mono_left convexJoin_mono_left
theorem convexJoin_mono_right (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : convexJoin 𝕜 s t₁ ⊆ convexJoin 𝕜 s t₂ :=
convexJoin_mono Subset.rfl ht
#align convex_join_mono_right convexJoin_mono_right
@[simp]
theorem convexJoin_empty_left (t : Set E) : convexJoin 𝕜 ∅ t = ∅ := by simp [convexJoin]
#align convex_join_empty_left convexJoin_empty_left
@[simp]
theorem convexJoin_empty_right (s : Set E) : convexJoin 𝕜 s ∅ = ∅ := by simp [convexJoin]
#align convex_join_empty_right convexJoin_empty_right
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Join.lean | 65 | 66 | theorem convexJoin_singleton_left (t : Set E) (x : E) :
convexJoin 𝕜 {x} t = ⋃ y ∈ t, segment 𝕜 x y := by | simp [convexJoin]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Prod
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
#align_import data.zmod.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"74ad1c88c77e799d2fea62801d1dbbd698cff1b7"
assert_not_exists Submodule
open Function
namespace ZMod
instance charZero : CharZero (ZMod 0) := inferInstanceAs (CharZero ℤ)
def val : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → ℕ
| 0 => Int.natAbs
| n + 1 => ((↑) : Fin (n + 1) → ℕ)
#align zmod.val ZMod.val
theorem val_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val < n := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
exact Fin.is_lt a
#align zmod.val_lt ZMod.val_lt
theorem val_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val ≤ n :=
a.val_lt.le
#align zmod.val_le ZMod.val_le
@[simp]
theorem val_zero : ∀ {n}, (0 : ZMod n).val = 0
| 0 => rfl
| _ + 1 => rfl
#align zmod.val_zero ZMod.val_zero
@[simp]
theorem val_one' : (1 : ZMod 0).val = 1 :=
rfl
#align zmod.val_one' ZMod.val_one'
@[simp]
theorem val_neg' {n : ZMod 0} : (-n).val = n.val :=
Int.natAbs_neg n
#align zmod.val_neg' ZMod.val_neg'
@[simp]
theorem val_mul' {m n : ZMod 0} : (m * n).val = m.val * n.val :=
Int.natAbs_mul m n
#align zmod.val_mul' ZMod.val_mul'
@[simp]
theorem val_natCast {n : ℕ} (a : ℕ) : (a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Nat.mod_zero]
exact Int.natAbs_ofNat a
· apply Fin.val_natCast
#align zmod.val_nat_cast ZMod.val_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias val_nat_cast := val_natCast
theorem val_unit' {n : ZMod 0} : IsUnit n ↔ n.val = 1 := by
simp only [val]
rw [Int.isUnit_iff, Int.natAbs_eq_iff, Nat.cast_one]
lemma eq_one_of_isUnit_natCast {n : ℕ} (h : IsUnit (n : ZMod 0)) : n = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.mod_zero n, ← val_natCast, val_unit'.mp h]
theorem val_natCast_of_lt {n a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : ZMod n).val = a := by
rwa [val_natCast, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias val_nat_cast_of_lt := val_natCast_of_lt
instance charP (n : ℕ) : CharP (ZMod n) n where
cast_eq_zero_iff' := by
intro k
cases' n with n
· simp [zero_dvd_iff, Int.natCast_eq_zero, Nat.zero_eq]
· exact Fin.natCast_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_one (n : ℕ) : addOrderOf (1 : ZMod n) = n :=
CharP.eq _ (CharP.addOrderOf_one _) (ZMod.charP n)
#align zmod.add_order_of_one ZMod.addOrderOf_one
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe (a : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (n0 : n ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
cases' a with a
· simp only [Nat.zero_eq, Nat.cast_zero, addOrderOf_zero, Nat.gcd_zero_right,
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero n0, Nat.div_self]
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a.succ_ne_zero, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
#align zmod.add_order_of_coe ZMod.addOrderOf_coe
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe' {a : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (a0 : a ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a0, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
#align zmod.add_order_of_coe' ZMod.addOrderOf_coe'
theorem ringChar_zmod_n (n : ℕ) : ringChar (ZMod n) = n := by
rw [ringChar.eq_iff]
exact ZMod.charP n
#align zmod.ring_char_zmod_n ZMod.ringChar_zmod_n
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem natCast_self (n : ℕ) : (n : ZMod n) = 0 :=
CharP.cast_eq_zero (ZMod n) n
#align zmod.nat_cast_self ZMod.natCast_self
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_self := natCast_self
@[simp]
theorem natCast_self' (n : ℕ) : (n + 1 : ZMod (n + 1)) = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_add_one, natCast_self (n + 1)]
#align zmod.nat_cast_self' ZMod.natCast_self'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_self' := natCast_self'
section UniversalProperty
variable {n : ℕ} {R : Type*}
section
variable [AddGroupWithOne R]
def cast : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → R
| 0 => Int.cast
| _ + 1 => fun i => i.val
#align zmod.cast ZMod.cast
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero : (cast (0 : ZMod n) : R) = 0 := by
delta ZMod.cast
cases n
· exact Int.cast_zero
· simp
#align zmod.cast_zero ZMod.cast_zero
theorem cast_eq_val [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R) = a.val := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
#align zmod.cast_eq_val ZMod.cast_eq_val
variable {S : Type*} [AddGroupWithOne S]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.fst_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).fst = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
#align prod.fst_zmod_cast Prod.fst_zmod_cast
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.snd_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).snd = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
#align prod.snd_zmod_cast Prod.snd_zmod_cast
end
theorem natCast_zmod_val {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (a.val : ZMod n) = a := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
· apply Fin.cast_val_eq_self
#align zmod.nat_cast_zmod_val ZMod.natCast_zmod_val
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_zmod_val := natCast_zmod_val
theorem natCast_rightInverse [NeZero n] : Function.RightInverse val ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) :=
natCast_zmod_val
#align zmod.nat_cast_right_inverse ZMod.natCast_rightInverse
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_rightInverse := natCast_rightInverse
theorem natCast_zmod_surjective [NeZero n] : Function.Surjective ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) :=
natCast_rightInverse.surjective
#align zmod.nat_cast_zmod_surjective ZMod.natCast_zmod_surjective
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_zmod_surjective := natCast_zmod_surjective
@[norm_cast]
theorem intCast_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : ((cast a : ℤ) : ZMod n) = a := by
cases n
· simp [ZMod.cast, ZMod]
· dsimp [ZMod.cast, ZMod]
erw [Int.cast_natCast, Fin.cast_val_eq_self]
#align zmod.int_cast_zmod_cast ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_zmod_cast := intCast_zmod_cast
theorem intCast_rightInverse : Function.RightInverse (cast : ZMod n → ℤ) ((↑) : ℤ → ZMod n) :=
intCast_zmod_cast
#align zmod.int_cast_right_inverse ZMod.intCast_rightInverse
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_rightInverse := intCast_rightInverse
theorem intCast_surjective : Function.Surjective ((↑) : ℤ → ZMod n) :=
intCast_rightInverse.surjective
#align zmod.int_cast_surjective ZMod.intCast_surjective
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_surjective := intCast_surjective
theorem cast_id : ∀ (n) (i : ZMod n), (ZMod.cast i : ZMod n) = i
| 0, _ => Int.cast_id
| _ + 1, i => natCast_zmod_val i
#align zmod.cast_id ZMod.cast_id
@[simp]
theorem cast_id' : (ZMod.cast : ZMod n → ZMod n) = id :=
funext (cast_id n)
#align zmod.cast_id' ZMod.cast_id'
variable (R) [Ring R]
@[simp]
theorem natCast_comp_val [NeZero n] : ((↑) : ℕ → R) ∘ (val : ZMod n → ℕ) = cast := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
#align zmod.nat_cast_comp_val ZMod.natCast_comp_val
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_comp_val := natCast_comp_val
@[simp]
theorem intCast_comp_cast : ((↑) : ℤ → R) ∘ (cast : ZMod n → ℤ) = cast := by
cases n
· exact congr_arg (Int.cast ∘ ·) ZMod.cast_id'
· ext
simp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
#align zmod.int_cast_comp_cast ZMod.intCast_comp_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_comp_cast := intCast_comp_cast
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem natCast_val [NeZero n] (i : ZMod n) : (i.val : R) = cast i :=
congr_fun (natCast_comp_val R) i
#align zmod.nat_cast_val ZMod.natCast_val
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_val := natCast_val
@[simp]
theorem intCast_cast (i : ZMod n) : ((cast i : ℤ) : R) = cast i :=
congr_fun (intCast_comp_cast R) i
#align zmod.int_cast_cast ZMod.intCast_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_cast := intCast_cast
theorem cast_add_eq_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) :
(cast (a + b) : ℤ) =
if (n : ℤ) ≤ cast a + cast b then (cast a + cast b - n : ℤ) else cast a + cast b := by
cases' n with n
· simp; rfl
change Fin (n + 1) at a b
change ((((a + b) : Fin (n + 1)) : ℕ) : ℤ) = if ((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℤ) ≤ (a : ℕ) + b then _ else _
simp only [Fin.val_add_eq_ite, Int.ofNat_succ, Int.ofNat_le]
norm_cast
split_ifs with h
· rw [Nat.cast_sub h]
congr
· rfl
#align zmod.coe_add_eq_ite ZMod.cast_add_eq_ite
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a ≡ b [ZMOD c] :=
CharP.intCast_eq_intCast (ZMod c) c
#align zmod.int_coe_eq_int_coe_iff ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_eq_int_cast_iff := intCast_eq_intCast_iff
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff' (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a % c = b % c :=
ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff a b c
#align zmod.int_coe_eq_int_coe_iff' ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_eq_int_cast_iff' := intCast_eq_intCast_iff'
theorem natCast_eq_natCast_iff (a b c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a ≡ b [MOD c] := by
simpa [Int.natCast_modEq_iff] using ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff a b c
#align zmod.nat_coe_eq_nat_coe_iff ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_eq_nat_cast_iff := natCast_eq_natCast_iff
theorem natCast_eq_natCast_iff' (a b c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a % c = b % c :=
ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff a b c
#align zmod.nat_coe_eq_nat_coe_iff' ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_eq_nat_cast_iff' := natCast_eq_natCast_iff'
theorem intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : (a : ZMod b) = 0 ↔ (b : ℤ) ∣ a := by
rw [← Int.cast_zero, ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff, Int.modEq_zero_iff_dvd]
#align zmod.int_coe_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd := intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff_dvd_sub (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = ↑b ↔ ↑c ∣ b - a := by
rw [ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff, Int.modEq_iff_dvd]
#align zmod.int_coe_eq_int_coe_iff_dvd_sub ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff_dvd_sub
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_eq_int_cast_iff_dvd_sub := intCast_eq_intCast_iff_dvd_sub
theorem natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd (a b : ℕ) : (a : ZMod b) = 0 ↔ b ∣ a := by
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff, Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd]
#align zmod.nat_coe_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd ZMod.natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd := natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd
theorem val_intCast {n : ℕ} (a : ℤ) [NeZero n] : ↑(a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
have hle : (0 : ℤ) ≤ ↑(a : ZMod n).val := Int.natCast_nonneg _
have hlt : ↑(a : ZMod n).val < (n : ℤ) := Int.ofNat_lt.mpr (ZMod.val_lt a)
refine (Int.emod_eq_of_lt hle hlt).symm.trans ?_
rw [← ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff', Int.cast_natCast, ZMod.natCast_val, ZMod.cast_id]
#align zmod.val_int_cast ZMod.val_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias val_int_cast := val_intCast
theorem coe_intCast {n : ℕ} (a : ℤ) : cast (a : ZMod n) = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Int.ofNat_zero, Int.emod_zero, Int.cast_id]; rfl
· rw [← val_intCast, val]; rfl
#align zmod.coe_int_cast ZMod.coe_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias coe_int_cast := coe_intCast
@[simp]
theorem val_neg_one (n : ℕ) : (-1 : ZMod n.succ).val = n := by
dsimp [val, Fin.coe_neg]
cases n
· simp [Nat.mod_one]
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
rw [Fin.coe_neg_one]
#align zmod.val_neg_one ZMod.val_neg_one
theorem cast_neg_one {R : Type*} [Ring R] (n : ℕ) : cast (-1 : ZMod n) = (n - 1 : R) := by
cases' n with n
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]; simp
· rw [← natCast_val, val_neg_one, Nat.cast_succ, add_sub_cancel_right]
#align zmod.cast_neg_one ZMod.cast_neg_one
theorem cast_sub_one {R : Type*} [Ring R] {n : ℕ} (k : ZMod n) :
(cast (k - 1 : ZMod n) : R) = (if k = 0 then (n : R) else cast k) - 1 := by
split_ifs with hk
· rw [hk, zero_sub, ZMod.cast_neg_one]
· cases n
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
rw [Int.cast_sub, Int.cast_one]
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [Fin.coe_sub_one, if_neg]
· rw [Nat.cast_sub, Nat.cast_one]
rwa [Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_zero, ← Ne, ← Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero] at hk
· exact hk
#align zmod.cast_sub_one ZMod.cast_sub_one
theorem natCast_eq_iff (p : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (z : ZMod p) [NeZero p] :
↑n = z ↔ ∃ k, n = z.val + p * k := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
refine ⟨n / p, ?_⟩
rw [val_natCast, Nat.mod_add_div]
· rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.cast_add, natCast_zmod_val, Nat.cast_mul, natCast_self, zero_mul,
add_zero]
#align zmod.nat_coe_zmod_eq_iff ZMod.natCast_eq_iff
theorem intCast_eq_iff (p : ℕ) (n : ℤ) (z : ZMod p) [NeZero p] :
↑n = z ↔ ∃ k, n = z.val + p * k := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
refine ⟨n / p, ?_⟩
rw [val_intCast, Int.emod_add_ediv]
· rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [Int.cast_add, Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_natCast, Int.cast_natCast, natCast_val,
ZMod.natCast_self, zero_mul, add_zero, cast_id]
#align zmod.int_coe_zmod_eq_iff ZMod.intCast_eq_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias nat_coe_zmod_eq_iff := natCast_eq_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias int_coe_zmod_eq_iff := intCast_eq_iff
@[push_cast, simp]
theorem intCast_mod (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : ((a % b : ℤ) : ZMod b) = (a : ZMod b) := by
rw [ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff]
apply Int.mod_modEq
#align zmod.int_cast_mod ZMod.intCast_mod
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_mod := intCast_mod
theorem ker_intCastAddHom (n : ℕ) :
(Int.castAddHom (ZMod n)).ker = AddSubgroup.zmultiples (n : ℤ) := by
ext
rw [Int.mem_zmultiples_iff, AddMonoidHom.mem_ker, Int.coe_castAddHom,
intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd]
#align zmod.ker_int_cast_add_hom ZMod.ker_intCastAddHom
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias ker_int_castAddHom := ker_intCastAddHom
theorem cast_injective_of_le {m n : ℕ} [nzm : NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) :
Function.Injective (@cast (ZMod n) _ m) := by
cases m with
| zero => cases nzm; simp_all
| succ m =>
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ f
simp only [cast, val, natCast_eq_natCast_iff',
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (hx.trans_le h), Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (hy.trans_le h)] at f
apply Fin.ext
exact f
theorem cast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_of_le {m n : ℕ} [NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) (a : ZMod m) :
(cast a : ZMod n) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← ZMod.cast_zero (n := m)]
exact Injective.eq_iff' (cast_injective_of_le h) rfl
-- Porting note: commented
-- unseal Int.NonNeg
@[simp]
theorem natCast_toNat (p : ℕ) : ∀ {z : ℤ} (_h : 0 ≤ z), (z.toNat : ZMod p) = z
| (n : ℕ), _h => by simp only [Int.cast_natCast, Int.toNat_natCast]
| Int.negSucc n, h => by simp at h
#align zmod.nat_cast_to_nat ZMod.natCast_toNat
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_toNat := natCast_toNat
theorem val_injective (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : Function.Injective (val : ZMod n → ℕ) := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
intro a b h
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
exact h
#align zmod.val_injective ZMod.val_injective
theorem val_one_eq_one_mod (n : ℕ) : (1 : ZMod n).val = 1 % n := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, val_natCast]
#align zmod.val_one_eq_one_mod ZMod.val_one_eq_one_mod
| Mathlib/Data/ZMod/Basic.lean | 735 | 737 | theorem val_one (n : ℕ) [Fact (1 < n)] : (1 : ZMod n).val = 1 := by |
rw [val_one_eq_one_mod]
exact Nat.mod_eq_of_lt Fact.out
|
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Count
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Monotone
import Mathlib.Order.OrderIsoNat
#align_import data.nat.nth from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7fdd4f3746cb059edfdb5d52cba98f66fce418c0"
open Finset
namespace Nat
variable (p : ℕ → Prop)
noncomputable def nth (p : ℕ → Prop) (n : ℕ) : ℕ := by
classical exact
if h : Set.Finite (setOf p) then (h.toFinset.sort (· ≤ ·)).getD n 0
else @Nat.Subtype.orderIsoOfNat (setOf p) (Set.Infinite.to_subtype h) n
#align nat.nth Nat.nth
variable {p}
theorem nth_of_card_le (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {n : ℕ} (hn : hf.toFinset.card ≤ n) :
nth p n = 0 := by rw [nth, dif_pos hf, List.getD_eq_default]; rwa [Finset.length_sort]
#align nat.nth_of_card_le Nat.nth_of_card_le
theorem nth_eq_getD_sort (h : (setOf p).Finite) (n : ℕ) :
nth p n = (h.toFinset.sort (· ≤ ·)).getD n 0 :=
dif_pos h
#align nat.nth_eq_nthd_sort Nat.nth_eq_getD_sort
theorem nth_eq_orderEmbOfFin (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {n : ℕ} (hn : n < hf.toFinset.card) :
nth p n = hf.toFinset.orderEmbOfFin rfl ⟨n, hn⟩ := by
rw [nth_eq_getD_sort hf, Finset.orderEmbOfFin_apply, List.getD_eq_get]
#align nat.nth_eq_order_emb_of_fin Nat.nth_eq_orderEmbOfFin
theorem nth_strictMonoOn (hf : (setOf p).Finite) :
StrictMonoOn (nth p) (Set.Iio hf.toFinset.card) := by
rintro m (hm : m < _) n (hn : n < _) h
simp only [nth_eq_orderEmbOfFin, *]
exact OrderEmbedding.strictMono _ h
#align nat.nth_strict_mono_on Nat.nth_strictMonoOn
theorem nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {m n : ℕ} (h : m < n)
(hn : n < hf.toFinset.card) : nth p m < nth p n :=
nth_strictMonoOn hf (h.trans hn) hn h
#align nat.nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card Nat.nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card
theorem nth_le_nth_of_lt_card (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n)
(hn : n < hf.toFinset.card) : nth p m ≤ nth p n :=
(nth_strictMonoOn hf).monotoneOn (h.trans_lt hn) hn h
#align nat.nth_le_nth_of_lt_card Nat.nth_le_nth_of_lt_card
theorem lt_of_nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {m n : ℕ} (h : nth p m < nth p n)
(hm : m < hf.toFinset.card) : m < n :=
not_le.1 fun hle => h.not_le <| nth_le_nth_of_lt_card hf hle hm
#align nat.lt_of_nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card Nat.lt_of_nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card
theorem le_of_nth_le_nth_of_lt_card (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {m n : ℕ} (h : nth p m ≤ nth p n)
(hm : m < hf.toFinset.card) : m ≤ n :=
not_lt.1 fun hlt => h.not_lt <| nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card hf hlt hm
#align nat.le_of_nth_le_nth_of_lt_card Nat.le_of_nth_le_nth_of_lt_card
theorem nth_injOn (hf : (setOf p).Finite) : (Set.Iio hf.toFinset.card).InjOn (nth p) :=
(nth_strictMonoOn hf).injOn
#align nat.nth_inj_on Nat.nth_injOn
theorem range_nth_of_finite (hf : (setOf p).Finite) : Set.range (nth p) = insert 0 (setOf p) := by
simpa only [← nth_eq_getD_sort hf, mem_sort, Set.Finite.mem_toFinset]
using Set.range_list_getD (hf.toFinset.sort (· ≤ ·)) 0
#align nat.range_nth_of_finite Nat.range_nth_of_finite
@[simp]
theorem image_nth_Iio_card (hf : (setOf p).Finite) : nth p '' Set.Iio hf.toFinset.card = setOf p :=
calc
nth p '' Set.Iio hf.toFinset.card = Set.range (hf.toFinset.orderEmbOfFin rfl) := by
ext x
simp only [Set.mem_image, Set.mem_range, Fin.exists_iff, ← nth_eq_orderEmbOfFin hf,
Set.mem_Iio, exists_prop]
_ = setOf p := by rw [range_orderEmbOfFin, Set.Finite.coe_toFinset]
#align nat.image_nth_Iio_card Nat.image_nth_Iio_card
theorem nth_mem_of_lt_card {n : ℕ} (hf : (setOf p).Finite) (hlt : n < hf.toFinset.card) :
p (nth p n) :=
(image_nth_Iio_card hf).subset <| Set.mem_image_of_mem _ hlt
#align nat.nth_mem_of_lt_card Nat.nth_mem_of_lt_card
theorem exists_lt_card_finite_nth_eq (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {x} (h : p x) :
∃ n, n < hf.toFinset.card ∧ nth p n = x := by
rwa [← @Set.mem_setOf_eq _ _ p, ← image_nth_Iio_card hf] at h
#align nat.exists_lt_card_finite_nth_eq Nat.exists_lt_card_finite_nth_eq
theorem nth_apply_eq_orderIsoOfNat (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) (n : ℕ) :
nth p n = @Nat.Subtype.orderIsoOfNat (setOf p) hf.to_subtype n := by rw [nth, dif_neg hf]
#align nat.nth_apply_eq_order_iso_of_nat Nat.nth_apply_eq_orderIsoOfNat
theorem nth_eq_orderIsoOfNat (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) :
nth p = (↑) ∘ @Nat.Subtype.orderIsoOfNat (setOf p) hf.to_subtype :=
funext <| nth_apply_eq_orderIsoOfNat hf
#align nat.nth_eq_order_iso_of_nat Nat.nth_eq_orderIsoOfNat
theorem nth_strictMono (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) : StrictMono (nth p) := by
rw [nth_eq_orderIsoOfNat hf]
exact (Subtype.strictMono_coe _).comp (OrderIso.strictMono _)
#align nat.nth_strict_mono Nat.nth_strictMono
theorem nth_injective (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) : Function.Injective (nth p) :=
(nth_strictMono hf).injective
#align nat.nth_injective Nat.nth_injective
theorem nth_monotone (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) : Monotone (nth p) :=
(nth_strictMono hf).monotone
#align nat.nth_monotone Nat.nth_monotone
theorem nth_lt_nth (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) {k n} : nth p k < nth p n ↔ k < n :=
(nth_strictMono hf).lt_iff_lt
#align nat.nth_lt_nth Nat.nth_lt_nth
theorem nth_le_nth (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) {k n} : nth p k ≤ nth p n ↔ k ≤ n :=
(nth_strictMono hf).le_iff_le
#align nat.nth_le_nth Nat.nth_le_nth
theorem range_nth_of_infinite (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) : Set.range (nth p) = setOf p := by
rw [nth_eq_orderIsoOfNat hf]
haveI := hf.to_subtype
-- Porting note: added `classical`; probably, Lean 3 found instance by unification
classical exact Nat.Subtype.coe_comp_ofNat_range
#align nat.range_nth_of_infinite Nat.range_nth_of_infinite
theorem nth_mem_of_infinite (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) (n : ℕ) : p (nth p n) :=
Set.range_subset_iff.1 (range_nth_of_infinite hf).le n
#align nat.nth_mem_of_infinite Nat.nth_mem_of_infinite
theorem exists_lt_card_nth_eq {x} (h : p x) :
∃ n, (∀ hf : (setOf p).Finite, n < hf.toFinset.card) ∧ nth p n = x := by
refine (setOf p).finite_or_infinite.elim (fun hf => ?_) fun hf => ?_
· rcases exists_lt_card_finite_nth_eq hf h with ⟨n, hn, hx⟩
exact ⟨n, fun _ => hn, hx⟩
· rw [← @Set.mem_setOf_eq _ _ p, ← range_nth_of_infinite hf] at h
rcases h with ⟨n, hx⟩
exact ⟨n, fun hf' => absurd hf' hf, hx⟩
#align nat.exists_lt_card_nth_eq Nat.exists_lt_card_nth_eq
theorem subset_range_nth : setOf p ⊆ Set.range (nth p) := fun x (hx : p x) =>
let ⟨n, _, hn⟩ := exists_lt_card_nth_eq hx
⟨n, hn⟩
#align nat.subset_range_nth Nat.subset_range_nth
theorem range_nth_subset : Set.range (nth p) ⊆ insert 0 (setOf p) :=
(setOf p).finite_or_infinite.elim (fun h => (range_nth_of_finite h).subset) fun h =>
(range_nth_of_infinite h).trans_subset (Set.subset_insert _ _)
#align nat.range_nth_subset Nat.range_nth_subset
theorem nth_mem (n : ℕ) (h : ∀ hf : (setOf p).Finite, n < hf.toFinset.card) : p (nth p n) :=
(setOf p).finite_or_infinite.elim (fun hf => nth_mem_of_lt_card hf (h hf)) fun h =>
nth_mem_of_infinite h n
#align nat.nth_mem Nat.nth_mem
theorem nth_lt_nth' {m n : ℕ} (hlt : m < n) (h : ∀ hf : (setOf p).Finite, n < hf.toFinset.card) :
nth p m < nth p n :=
(setOf p).finite_or_infinite.elim (fun hf => nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card hf hlt (h _)) fun hf =>
(nth_lt_nth hf).2 hlt
#align nat.nth_lt_nth' Nat.nth_lt_nth'
theorem nth_le_nth' {m n : ℕ} (hle : m ≤ n) (h : ∀ hf : (setOf p).Finite, n < hf.toFinset.card) :
nth p m ≤ nth p n :=
(setOf p).finite_or_infinite.elim (fun hf => nth_le_nth_of_lt_card hf hle (h _)) fun hf =>
(nth_le_nth hf).2 hle
#align nat.nth_le_nth' Nat.nth_le_nth'
theorem le_nth {n : ℕ} (h : ∀ hf : (setOf p).Finite, n < hf.toFinset.card) : n ≤ nth p n :=
(setOf p).finite_or_infinite.elim
(fun hf => ((nth_strictMonoOn hf).mono <| Set.Iic_subset_Iio.2 (h _)).Iic_id_le _ le_rfl)
fun hf => (nth_strictMono hf).id_le _
#align nat.le_nth Nat.le_nth
theorem isLeast_nth {n} (h : ∀ hf : (setOf p).Finite, n < hf.toFinset.card) :
IsLeast {i | p i ∧ ∀ k < n, nth p k < i} (nth p n) :=
⟨⟨nth_mem n h, fun _k hk => nth_lt_nth' hk h⟩, fun _x hx =>
let ⟨k, hk, hkx⟩ := exists_lt_card_nth_eq hx.1
(lt_or_le k n).elim (fun hlt => absurd hkx (hx.2 _ hlt).ne) fun hle => hkx ▸ nth_le_nth' hle hk⟩
#align nat.is_least_nth Nat.isLeast_nth
theorem isLeast_nth_of_lt_card {n : ℕ} (hf : (setOf p).Finite) (hn : n < hf.toFinset.card) :
IsLeast {i | p i ∧ ∀ k < n, nth p k < i} (nth p n) :=
isLeast_nth fun _ => hn
#align nat.is_least_nth_of_lt_card Nat.isLeast_nth_of_lt_card
theorem isLeast_nth_of_infinite (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) (n : ℕ) :
IsLeast {i | p i ∧ ∀ k < n, nth p k < i} (nth p n) :=
isLeast_nth fun h => absurd h hf
#align nat.is_least_nth_of_infinite Nat.isLeast_nth_of_infinite
theorem nth_eq_sInf (p : ℕ → Prop) (n : ℕ) : nth p n = sInf {x | p x ∧ ∀ k < n, nth p k < x} := by
by_cases hn : ∀ hf : (setOf p).Finite, n < hf.toFinset.card
· exact (isLeast_nth hn).csInf_eq.symm
· push_neg at hn
rcases hn with ⟨hf, hn⟩
rw [nth_of_card_le _ hn]
refine ((congr_arg sInf <| Set.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem fun k hk => ?_).trans sInf_empty).symm
rcases exists_lt_card_nth_eq hk.1 with ⟨k, hlt, rfl⟩
exact (hk.2 _ ((hlt hf).trans_le hn)).false
#align nat.nth_eq_Inf Nat.nth_eq_sInf
theorem nth_zero : nth p 0 = sInf (setOf p) := by rw [nth_eq_sInf]; simp
#align nat.nth_zero Nat.nth_zero
@[simp]
theorem nth_zero_of_zero (h : p 0) : nth p 0 = 0 := by simp [nth_zero, h]
#align nat.nth_zero_of_zero Nat.nth_zero_of_zero
theorem nth_zero_of_exists [DecidablePred p] (h : ∃ n, p n) : nth p 0 = Nat.find h := by
rw [nth_zero]; convert Nat.sInf_def h
#align nat.nth_zero_of_exists Nat.nth_zero_of_exists
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Nth.lean | 269 | 275 | theorem nth_eq_zero {n} :
nth p n = 0 ↔ p 0 ∧ n = 0 ∨ ∃ hf : (setOf p).Finite, hf.toFinset.card ≤ n := by |
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [or_iff_not_imp_right, not_exists, not_le]
exact fun hn => ⟨h ▸ nth_mem _ hn, nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 <| h ▸ le_nth hn⟩
· rintro (⟨h₀, rfl⟩ | ⟨hf, hle⟩)
exacts [nth_zero_of_zero h₀, nth_of_card_le hf hle]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Instances
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.ProjIcc
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Real
#align_import topology.unit_interval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology Filter
open Set Int Set.Icc
abbrev unitInterval : Set ℝ :=
Set.Icc 0 1
#align unit_interval unitInterval
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[unitInterval] notation "I" => unitInterval
namespace unitInterval
theorem zero_mem : (0 : ℝ) ∈ I :=
⟨le_rfl, zero_le_one⟩
#align unit_interval.zero_mem unitInterval.zero_mem
theorem one_mem : (1 : ℝ) ∈ I :=
⟨zero_le_one, le_rfl⟩
#align unit_interval.one_mem unitInterval.one_mem
theorem mul_mem {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ I) (hy : y ∈ I) : x * y ∈ I :=
⟨mul_nonneg hx.1 hy.1, mul_le_one hx.2 hy.1 hy.2⟩
#align unit_interval.mul_mem unitInterval.mul_mem
theorem div_mem {x y : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hxy : x ≤ y) : x / y ∈ I :=
⟨div_nonneg hx hy, div_le_one_of_le hxy hy⟩
#align unit_interval.div_mem unitInterval.div_mem
theorem fract_mem (x : ℝ) : fract x ∈ I :=
⟨fract_nonneg _, (fract_lt_one _).le⟩
#align unit_interval.fract_mem unitInterval.fract_mem
theorem mem_iff_one_sub_mem {t : ℝ} : t ∈ I ↔ 1 - t ∈ I := by
rw [mem_Icc, mem_Icc]
constructor <;> intro <;> constructor <;> linarith
#align unit_interval.mem_iff_one_sub_mem unitInterval.mem_iff_one_sub_mem
instance hasZero : Zero I :=
⟨⟨0, zero_mem⟩⟩
#align unit_interval.has_zero unitInterval.hasZero
instance hasOne : One I :=
⟨⟨1, by constructor <;> norm_num⟩⟩
#align unit_interval.has_one unitInterval.hasOne
instance : ZeroLEOneClass I := ⟨zero_le_one (α := ℝ)⟩
instance : BoundedOrder I := Set.Icc.boundedOrder zero_le_one
lemma univ_eq_Icc : (univ : Set I) = Icc (0 : I) (1 : I) := Icc_bot_top.symm
theorem coe_ne_zero {x : I} : (x : ℝ) ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
not_iff_not.mpr coe_eq_zero
#align unit_interval.coe_ne_zero unitInterval.coe_ne_zero
theorem coe_ne_one {x : I} : (x : ℝ) ≠ 1 ↔ x ≠ 1 :=
not_iff_not.mpr coe_eq_one
#align unit_interval.coe_ne_one unitInterval.coe_ne_one
instance : Nonempty I :=
⟨0⟩
instance : Mul I :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x * y, mul_mem x.2 y.2⟩⟩
-- todo: we could set up a `LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero I` instance
theorem mul_le_left {x y : I} : x * y ≤ x :=
Subtype.coe_le_coe.mp <| mul_le_of_le_one_right x.2.1 y.2.2
#align unit_interval.mul_le_left unitInterval.mul_le_left
theorem mul_le_right {x y : I} : x * y ≤ y :=
Subtype.coe_le_coe.mp <| mul_le_of_le_one_left y.2.1 x.2.2
#align unit_interval.mul_le_right unitInterval.mul_le_right
def symm : I → I := fun t => ⟨1 - t, mem_iff_one_sub_mem.mp t.prop⟩
#align unit_interval.symm unitInterval.symm
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "σ" => unitInterval.symm
@[simp]
theorem symm_zero : σ 0 = 1 :=
Subtype.ext <| by simp [symm]
#align unit_interval.symm_zero unitInterval.symm_zero
@[simp]
theorem symm_one : σ 1 = 0 :=
Subtype.ext <| by simp [symm]
#align unit_interval.symm_one unitInterval.symm_one
@[simp]
theorem symm_symm (x : I) : σ (σ x) = x :=
Subtype.ext <| by simp [symm]
#align unit_interval.symm_symm unitInterval.symm_symm
theorem symm_involutive : Function.Involutive (symm : I → I) := symm_symm
theorem symm_bijective : Function.Bijective (symm : I → I) := symm_involutive.bijective
@[simp]
theorem coe_symm_eq (x : I) : (σ x : ℝ) = 1 - x :=
rfl
#align unit_interval.coe_symm_eq unitInterval.coe_symm_eq
-- Porting note: Proof used to be `by continuity!`
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_symm : Continuous σ :=
(continuous_const.add continuous_induced_dom.neg).subtype_mk _
#align unit_interval.continuous_symm unitInterval.continuous_symm
@[simps]
def symmHomeomorph : I ≃ₜ I where
toFun := symm
invFun := symm
left_inv := symm_symm
right_inv := symm_symm
theorem strictAnti_symm : StrictAnti σ := fun _ _ h ↦ sub_lt_sub_left (α := ℝ) h _
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-27")] alias involutive_symm := symm_involutive
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-27")] alias bijective_symm := symm_bijective
| Mathlib/Topology/UnitInterval.lean | 154 | 155 | theorem half_le_symm_iff (t : I) : 1 / 2 ≤ (σ t : ℝ) ↔ (t : ℝ) ≤ 1 / 2 := by |
rw [coe_symm_eq, le_sub_iff_add_le, add_comm, ← le_sub_iff_add_le, sub_half]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Degrees
#align_import data.mv_polynomial.variables from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f5b500a507264de86d666a5f87ddb976e2d8de4"
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v}
namespace MvPolynomial
variable {σ τ : Type*} {r : R} {e : ℕ} {n m : σ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R}
section Vars
def vars (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finset σ :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
p.degrees.toFinset
#align mv_polynomial.vars MvPolynomial.vars
theorem vars_def [DecidableEq σ] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : p.vars = p.degrees.toFinset := by
rw [vars]
convert rfl
#align mv_polynomial.vars_def MvPolynomial.vars_def
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Variables.lean | 77 | 78 | theorem vars_0 : (0 : MvPolynomial σ R).vars = ∅ := by |
classical rw [vars_def, degrees_zero, Multiset.toFinset_zero]
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral
#align_import measure_theory.integral.layercake from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"08a4542bec7242a5c60f179e4e49de8c0d677b1b"
noncomputable section
open scoped ENNReal MeasureTheory Topology
open Set MeasureTheory Filter Measure
namespace MeasureTheory
section
variable {α R : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] (μ : Measure α) [LinearOrder R]
theorem countable_meas_le_ne_meas_lt (g : α → R) :
{t : R | μ {a : α | t ≤ g a} ≠ μ {a : α | t < g a}}.Countable := by
-- the target set is contained in the set of points where the function `t ↦ μ {a : α | t ≤ g a}`
-- jumps down on the right of `t`. This jump set is countable for any function.
let F : R → ℝ≥0∞ := fun t ↦ μ {a : α | t ≤ g a}
apply (countable_image_gt_image_Ioi F).mono
intro t ht
have : μ {a | t < g a} < μ {a | t ≤ g a} :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (measure_mono (fun a ha ↦ le_of_lt ha)) (Ne.symm ht)
exact ⟨μ {a | t < g a}, this, fun s hs ↦ measure_mono (fun a ha ↦ hs.trans_le ha)⟩
theorem meas_le_ae_eq_meas_lt {R : Type*} [LinearOrder R] [MeasurableSpace R]
(ν : Measure R) [NoAtoms ν] (g : α → R) :
(fun t => μ {a : α | t ≤ g a}) =ᵐ[ν] fun t => μ {a : α | t < g a} :=
Set.Countable.measure_zero (countable_meas_le_ne_meas_lt μ g) _
end
section Layercake
variable {α : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {f : α → ℝ} {g : ℝ → ℝ} {s : Set α}
theorem lintegral_comp_eq_lintegral_meas_le_mul_of_measurable_of_sigmaFinite
(μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ]
(f_nn : 0 ≤ f) (f_mble : Measurable f)
(g_intble : ∀ t > 0, IntervalIntegrable g volume 0 t) (g_mble : Measurable g)
(g_nn : ∀ t > 0, 0 ≤ g t) :
∫⁻ ω, ENNReal.ofReal (∫ t in (0)..f ω, g t) ∂μ =
∫⁻ t in Ioi 0, μ {a : α | t ≤ f a} * ENNReal.ofReal (g t) := by
have g_intble' : ∀ t : ℝ, 0 ≤ t → IntervalIntegrable g volume 0 t := by
intro t ht
cases' eq_or_lt_of_le ht with h h
· simp [← h]
· exact g_intble t h
have integrand_eq : ∀ ω,
ENNReal.ofReal (∫ t in (0)..f ω, g t) = ∫⁻ t in Ioc 0 (f ω), ENNReal.ofReal (g t) := by
intro ω
have g_ae_nn : 0 ≤ᵐ[volume.restrict (Ioc 0 (f ω))] g := by
filter_upwards [self_mem_ae_restrict (measurableSet_Ioc : MeasurableSet (Ioc 0 (f ω)))]
with x hx using g_nn x hx.1
rw [← ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal (g_intble' (f ω) (f_nn ω)).1 g_ae_nn]
congr
exact intervalIntegral.integral_of_le (f_nn ω)
rw [lintegral_congr integrand_eq]
simp_rw [← lintegral_indicator (fun t => ENNReal.ofReal (g t)) measurableSet_Ioc]
-- Porting note: was part of `simp_rw` on the previous line, but didn't trigger.
rw [← lintegral_indicator _ measurableSet_Ioi, lintegral_lintegral_swap]
· apply congr_arg
funext s
have aux₁ :
(fun x => (Ioc 0 (f x)).indicator (fun t : ℝ => ENNReal.ofReal (g t)) s) = fun x =>
ENNReal.ofReal (g s) * (Ioi (0 : ℝ)).indicator (fun _ => 1) s *
(Ici s).indicator (fun _ : ℝ => (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) (f x) := by
funext a
by_cases h : s ∈ Ioc (0 : ℝ) (f a)
· simp only [h, show s ∈ Ioi (0 : ℝ) from h.1, show f a ∈ Ici s from h.2, indicator_of_mem,
mul_one]
· have h_copy := h
simp only [mem_Ioc, not_and, not_le] at h
by_cases h' : 0 < s
· simp only [h_copy, h h', indicator_of_not_mem, not_false_iff, mem_Ici, not_le, mul_zero]
· have : s ∉ Ioi (0 : ℝ) := h'
simp only [this, h', indicator_of_not_mem, not_false_iff, mul_zero,
zero_mul, mem_Ioc, false_and_iff]
simp_rw [aux₁]
rw [lintegral_const_mul']
swap;
· apply ENNReal.mul_ne_top ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top
by_cases h : (0 : ℝ) < s <;> · simp [h]
simp_rw [show
(fun a => (Ici s).indicator (fun _ : ℝ => (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) (f a)) = fun a =>
{a : α | s ≤ f a}.indicator (fun _ => 1) a
by funext a; by_cases h : s ≤ f a <;> simp [h]]
rw [lintegral_indicator₀]
swap; · exact f_mble.nullMeasurable measurableSet_Ici
rw [lintegral_one, Measure.restrict_apply MeasurableSet.univ, univ_inter, indicator_mul_left,
mul_assoc,
show
(Ioi 0).indicator (fun _x : ℝ => (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) s * μ {a : α | s ≤ f a} =
(Ioi 0).indicator (fun _x : ℝ => 1 * μ {a : α | s ≤ f a}) s
by by_cases h : 0 < s <;> simp [h]]
simp_rw [mul_comm _ (ENNReal.ofReal _), one_mul]
rfl
have aux₂ :
(Function.uncurry fun (x : α) (y : ℝ) =>
(Ioc 0 (f x)).indicator (fun t : ℝ => ENNReal.ofReal (g t)) y) =
{p : α × ℝ | p.2 ∈ Ioc 0 (f p.1)}.indicator fun p => ENNReal.ofReal (g p.2) := by
funext p
cases p with | mk p_fst p_snd => ?_
rw [Function.uncurry_apply_pair]
by_cases h : p_snd ∈ Ioc 0 (f p_fst)
· have h' : (p_fst, p_snd) ∈ {p : α × ℝ | p.snd ∈ Ioc 0 (f p.fst)} := h
rw [Set.indicator_of_mem h', Set.indicator_of_mem h]
· have h' : (p_fst, p_snd) ∉ {p : α × ℝ | p.snd ∈ Ioc 0 (f p.fst)} := h
rw [Set.indicator_of_not_mem h', Set.indicator_of_not_mem h]
rw [aux₂]
have mble₀ : MeasurableSet {p : α × ℝ | p.snd ∈ Ioc 0 (f p.fst)} := by
simpa only [mem_univ, Pi.zero_apply, gt_iff_lt, not_lt, ge_iff_le, true_and] using
measurableSet_region_between_oc measurable_zero f_mble MeasurableSet.univ
exact (ENNReal.measurable_ofReal.comp (g_mble.comp measurable_snd)).aemeasurable.indicator₀
mble₀.nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.lintegral_comp_eq_lintegral_meas_le_mul_of_measurable MeasureTheory.lintegral_comp_eq_lintegral_meas_le_mul_of_measurable_of_sigmaFinite
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Layercake.lean | 195 | 381 | theorem lintegral_comp_eq_lintegral_meas_le_mul_of_measurable (μ : Measure α)
(f_nn : 0 ≤ f) (f_mble : Measurable f)
(g_intble : ∀ t > 0, IntervalIntegrable g volume 0 t) (g_mble : Measurable g)
(g_nn : ∀ t > 0, 0 ≤ g t) :
∫⁻ ω, ENNReal.ofReal (∫ t in (0)..f ω, g t) ∂μ =
∫⁻ t in Ioi 0, μ {a : α | t ≤ f a} * ENNReal.ofReal (g t) := by |
/- We will reduce to the sigma-finite case, after excluding two easy cases where the result
is more or less obvious. -/
have f_nonneg : ∀ ω, 0 ≤ f ω := fun ω ↦ f_nn ω
-- trivial case where `g` is ae zero. Then both integrals vanish.
by_cases H1 : g =ᵐ[volume.restrict (Ioi (0 : ℝ))] 0
· have A : ∫⁻ ω, ENNReal.ofReal (∫ t in (0)..f ω, g t) ∂μ = 0 := by
have : ∀ ω, ∫ t in (0)..f ω, g t = ∫ t in (0)..f ω, 0 := by
intro ω
simp_rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le (f_nonneg ω)]
apply integral_congr_ae
exact ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_of_subset Ioc_subset_Ioi_self H1
simp [this]
have B : ∫⁻ t in Ioi 0, μ {a : α | t ≤ f a} * ENNReal.ofReal (g t) = 0 := by
have : (fun t ↦ μ {a : α | t ≤ f a} * ENNReal.ofReal (g t))
=ᵐ[volume.restrict (Ioi (0:ℝ))] 0 := by
filter_upwards [H1] with t ht using by simp [ht]
simp [lintegral_congr_ae this]
rw [A, B]
-- easy case where both sides are obviously infinite: for some `s`, one has
-- `μ {a : α | s < f a} = ∞` and moreover `g` is not ae zero on `[0, s]`.
by_cases H2 : ∃ s > 0, 0 < ∫ t in (0)..s, g t ∧ μ {a : α | s < f a} = ∞
· rcases H2 with ⟨s, s_pos, hs, h's⟩
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le s_pos.le] at hs
/- The first integral is infinite, as for `t ∈ [0, s]` one has `μ {a : α | t ≤ f a} = ∞`,
and moreover the additional integral `g` is not uniformly zero. -/
have A : ∫⁻ t in Ioi 0, μ {a : α | t ≤ f a} * ENNReal.ofReal (g t) = ∞ := by
rw [eq_top_iff]
calc
∞ = ∫⁻ t in Ioc 0 s, ∞ * ENNReal.ofReal (g t) := by
have I_pos : ∫⁻ (a : ℝ) in Ioc 0 s, ENNReal.ofReal (g a) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal (g_intble s s_pos).1]
· simpa only [not_lt, ge_iff_le, ne_eq, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, not_le] using hs
· filter_upwards [ae_restrict_mem measurableSet_Ioc] with t ht using g_nn _ ht.1
rw [lintegral_const_mul, ENNReal.top_mul I_pos]
exact ENNReal.measurable_ofReal.comp g_mble
_ ≤ ∫⁻ t in Ioc 0 s, μ {a : α | t ≤ f a} * ENNReal.ofReal (g t) := by
apply set_lintegral_mono' measurableSet_Ioc (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
rw [← h's]
gcongr
exact fun a ha ↦ hx.2.trans (le_of_lt ha)
_ ≤ ∫⁻ t in Ioi 0, μ {a : α | t ≤ f a} * ENNReal.ofReal (g t) :=
lintegral_mono_set Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
/- The second integral is infinite, as one integrates amont other things on those `ω` where
`f ω > s`: this is an infinite measure set, and on it the integrand is bounded below
by `∫ t in 0..s, g t` which is positive. -/
have B : ∫⁻ ω, ENNReal.ofReal (∫ t in (0)..f ω, g t) ∂μ = ∞ := by
rw [eq_top_iff]
calc
∞ = ∫⁻ _ in {a | s < f a}, ENNReal.ofReal (∫ t in (0)..s, g t) ∂μ := by
simp only [lintegral_const, MeasurableSet.univ, Measure.restrict_apply, univ_inter,
h's, ne_eq, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, not_le]
rw [ENNReal.mul_top]
simpa [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le s_pos.le] using hs
_ ≤ ∫⁻ ω in {a | s < f a}, ENNReal.ofReal (∫ t in (0)..f ω, g t) ∂μ := by
apply set_lintegral_mono' (measurableSet_lt measurable_const f_mble) (fun a ha ↦ ?_)
apply ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal
apply intervalIntegral.integral_mono_interval le_rfl s_pos.le (le_of_lt ha)
· filter_upwards [ae_restrict_mem measurableSet_Ioc] with t ht using g_nn _ ht.1
· exact g_intble _ (s_pos.trans ha)
_ ≤ ∫⁻ ω, ENNReal.ofReal (∫ t in (0)..f ω, g t) ∂μ := set_lintegral_le_lintegral _ _
rw [A, B]
/- It remains to handle the interesting case, where `g` is not zero, but both integrals are
not obviously infinite. Let `M` be the largest number such that `g = 0` on `[0, M]`. Then we
may restrict `μ` to the points where `f ω > M` (as the other ones do not contribute to the
integral). The restricted measure `ν` is sigma-finite, as `μ` gives finite measure to
`{ω | f ω > a}` for any `a > M` (otherwise, we would be in the easy case above), so that
one can write (a full measure subset of) the space as the countable union of the finite measure
sets `{ω | f ω > uₙ}` for `uₙ` a sequence decreasing to `M`. Therefore,
this case follows from the case where the measure is sigma-finite, applied to `ν`. -/
push_neg at H2
have M_bdd : BddAbove {s : ℝ | g =ᵐ[volume.restrict (Ioc (0 : ℝ) s)] 0} := by
contrapose! H1
have : ∀ (n : ℕ), g =ᵐ[volume.restrict (Ioc (0 : ℝ) n)] 0 := by
intro n
rcases not_bddAbove_iff.1 H1 n with ⟨s, hs, ns⟩
exact ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_of_subset (Ioc_subset_Ioc_right ns.le) hs
have Hg : g =ᵐ[volume.restrict (⋃ (n : ℕ), (Ioc (0 : ℝ) n))] 0 :=
(ae_restrict_iUnion_iff _ _).2 this
have : (⋃ (n : ℕ), (Ioc (0 : ℝ) n)) = Ioi 0 :=
iUnion_Ioc_eq_Ioi_self_iff.2 (fun x _ ↦ exists_nat_ge x)
rwa [this] at Hg
-- let `M` be the largest number such that `g` vanishes ae on `(0, M]`.
let M : ℝ := sSup {s : ℝ | g =ᵐ[volume.restrict (Ioc (0 : ℝ) s)] 0}
have zero_mem : 0 ∈ {s : ℝ | g =ᵐ[volume.restrict (Ioc (0 : ℝ) s)] 0} := by simpa using trivial
have M_nonneg : 0 ≤ M := le_csSup M_bdd zero_mem
-- Then the function `g` indeed vanishes ae on `(0, M]`.
have hgM : g =ᵐ[volume.restrict (Ioc (0 : ℝ) M)] 0 := by
rw [← restrict_Ioo_eq_restrict_Ioc]
obtain ⟨u, -, uM, ulim⟩ : ∃ u, StrictMono u ∧ (∀ (n : ℕ), u n < M) ∧ Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 M) :=
exists_seq_strictMono_tendsto M
have I : ∀ n, g =ᵐ[volume.restrict (Ioc (0 : ℝ) (u n))] 0 := by
intro n
obtain ⟨s, hs, uns⟩ : ∃ s, g =ᶠ[ae (Measure.restrict volume (Ioc 0 s))] 0 ∧ u n < s :=
exists_lt_of_lt_csSup (Set.nonempty_of_mem zero_mem) (uM n)
exact ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_of_subset (Ioc_subset_Ioc_right uns.le) hs
have : g =ᵐ[volume.restrict (⋃ n, Ioc (0 : ℝ) (u n))] 0 := (ae_restrict_iUnion_iff _ _).2 I
apply ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_of_subset _ this
rintro x ⟨x_pos, xM⟩
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, x < u n := ((tendsto_order.1 ulim).1 _ xM).exists
exact mem_iUnion.2 ⟨n, ⟨x_pos, hn.le⟩⟩
-- Let `ν` be the restriction of `μ` to those points where `f a > M`.
let ν := μ.restrict {a : α | M < f a}
-- This measure is sigma-finite (this is the whole point of the argument).
have : SigmaFinite ν := by
obtain ⟨u, -, uM, ulim⟩ : ∃ u, StrictAnti u ∧ (∀ (n : ℕ), M < u n) ∧ Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 M) :=
exists_seq_strictAnti_tendsto M
let s : ν.FiniteSpanningSetsIn univ :=
{ set := fun n ↦ {a | f a ≤ M} ∪ {a | u n < f a}
set_mem := fun _ ↦ trivial
finite := by
intro n
have I : ν {a | f a ≤ M} = 0 := by
rw [Measure.restrict_apply (measurableSet_le f_mble measurable_const)]
convert measure_empty (μ := μ)
rw [← disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty]
exact disjoint_left.mpr (fun a ha ↦ by simpa using ha)
have J : μ {a | u n < f a} < ∞ := by
rw [lt_top_iff_ne_top]
apply H2 _ (M_nonneg.trans_lt (uM n))
by_contra H3
rw [not_lt, intervalIntegral.integral_of_le (M_nonneg.trans (uM n).le)] at H3
have g_nn_ae : ∀ᵐ t ∂(volume.restrict (Ioc 0 (u n))), 0 ≤ g t := by
filter_upwards [ae_restrict_mem measurableSet_Ioc] with s hs using g_nn _ hs.1
have Ig : ∫ (t : ℝ) in Ioc 0 (u n), g t = 0 :=
le_antisymm H3 (integral_nonneg_of_ae g_nn_ae)
have J : ∀ᵐ t ∂(volume.restrict (Ioc 0 (u n))), g t = 0 :=
(integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae g_nn_ae
(g_intble (u n) (M_nonneg.trans_lt (uM n))).1).1 Ig
have : u n ≤ M := le_csSup M_bdd J
exact lt_irrefl _ (this.trans_lt (uM n))
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_union_le _ _) ?_
rw [I, zero_add]
apply lt_of_le_of_lt _ J
exact restrict_le_self _
spanning := by
apply eq_univ_iff_forall.2 (fun a ↦ ?_)
rcases le_or_lt (f a) M with ha|ha
· exact mem_iUnion.2 ⟨0, Or.inl ha⟩
· obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, u n < f a := ((tendsto_order.1 ulim).2 _ ha).exists
exact mem_iUnion.2 ⟨n, Or.inr hn⟩ }
exact ⟨⟨s⟩⟩
-- the first integrals with respect to `μ` and to `ν` coincide, as points with `f a ≤ M` are
-- weighted by zero as `g` vanishes there.
have A : ∫⁻ ω, ENNReal.ofReal (∫ t in (0)..f ω, g t) ∂μ
= ∫⁻ ω, ENNReal.ofReal (∫ t in (0)..f ω, g t) ∂ν := by
have meas : MeasurableSet {a | M < f a} := measurableSet_lt measurable_const f_mble
have I : ∫⁻ ω in {a | M < f a}ᶜ, ENNReal.ofReal (∫ t in (0).. f ω, g t) ∂μ
= ∫⁻ _ in {a | M < f a}ᶜ, 0 ∂μ := by
apply set_lintegral_congr_fun meas.compl (eventually_of_forall (fun s hs ↦ ?_))
have : ∫ (t : ℝ) in (0)..f s, g t = ∫ (t : ℝ) in (0)..f s, 0 := by
simp_rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le (f_nonneg s)]
apply integral_congr_ae
apply ae_mono (restrict_mono ?_ le_rfl) hgM
apply Ioc_subset_Ioc_right
simpa using hs
simp [this]
simp only [lintegral_const, zero_mul] at I
rw [← lintegral_add_compl _ meas, I, add_zero]
-- the second integrals with respect to `μ` and to `ν` coincide, as points with `f a ≤ M` do not
-- contribute to either integral since the weight `g` vanishes.
have B : ∫⁻ t in Ioi 0, μ {a : α | t ≤ f a} * ENNReal.ofReal (g t)
= ∫⁻ t in Ioi 0, ν {a : α | t ≤ f a} * ENNReal.ofReal (g t) := by
have B1 : ∫⁻ t in Ioc 0 M, μ {a : α | t ≤ f a} * ENNReal.ofReal (g t)
= ∫⁻ t in Ioc 0 M, ν {a : α | t ≤ f a} * ENNReal.ofReal (g t) := by
apply lintegral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [hgM] with t ht
simp [ht]
have B2 : ∫⁻ t in Ioi M, μ {a : α | t ≤ f a} * ENNReal.ofReal (g t)
= ∫⁻ t in Ioi M, ν {a : α | t ≤ f a} * ENNReal.ofReal (g t) := by
apply set_lintegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi (eventually_of_forall (fun t ht ↦ ?_))
rw [Measure.restrict_apply (measurableSet_le measurable_const f_mble)]
congr 3
exact (inter_eq_left.2 (fun a ha ↦ (mem_Ioi.1 ht).trans_le ha)).symm
have I : Ioi (0 : ℝ) = Ioc (0 : ℝ) M ∪ Ioi M := (Ioc_union_Ioi_eq_Ioi M_nonneg).symm
have J : Disjoint (Ioc 0 M) (Ioi M) := Ioc_disjoint_Ioi le_rfl
rw [I, lintegral_union measurableSet_Ioi J, lintegral_union measurableSet_Ioi J, B1, B2]
-- therefore, we may replace the integrals wrt `μ` with integrals wrt `ν`, and apply the
-- result for sigma-finite measures.
rw [A, B]
exact lintegral_comp_eq_lintegral_meas_le_mul_of_measurable_of_sigmaFinite
ν f_nn f_mble g_intble g_mble g_nn
|
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.HausdorffDistance
#align_import topology.metric_space.pi_nat from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"49b7f94aab3a3bdca1f9f34c5d818afb253b3993"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology Filter
open TopologicalSpace Set Metric Filter Function
attribute [local simp] pow_le_pow_iff_right one_lt_two inv_le_inv zero_le_two zero_lt_two
variable {E : ℕ → Type*}
namespace PiNat
irreducible_def firstDiff (x y : ∀ n, E n) : ℕ :=
if h : x ≠ y then Nat.find (ne_iff.1 h) else 0
#align pi_nat.first_diff PiNat.firstDiff
theorem apply_firstDiff_ne {x y : ∀ n, E n} (h : x ≠ y) :
x (firstDiff x y) ≠ y (firstDiff x y) := by
rw [firstDiff_def, dif_pos h]
exact Nat.find_spec (ne_iff.1 h)
#align pi_nat.apply_first_diff_ne PiNat.apply_firstDiff_ne
theorem apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff {x y : ∀ n, E n} {n : ℕ} (hn : n < firstDiff x y) : x n = y n := by
rw [firstDiff_def] at hn
split_ifs at hn with h
· convert Nat.find_min (ne_iff.1 h) hn
simp
· exact (not_lt_zero' hn).elim
#align pi_nat.apply_eq_of_lt_first_diff PiNat.apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff
theorem firstDiff_comm (x y : ∀ n, E n) : firstDiff x y = firstDiff y x := by
simp only [firstDiff_def, ne_comm]
#align pi_nat.first_diff_comm PiNat.firstDiff_comm
theorem min_firstDiff_le (x y z : ∀ n, E n) (h : x ≠ z) :
min (firstDiff x y) (firstDiff y z) ≤ firstDiff x z := by
by_contra! H
rw [lt_min_iff] at H
refine apply_firstDiff_ne h ?_
calc
x (firstDiff x z) = y (firstDiff x z) := apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff H.1
_ = z (firstDiff x z) := apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff H.2
#align pi_nat.min_first_diff_le PiNat.min_firstDiff_le
def cylinder (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) : Set (∀ n, E n) :=
{ y | ∀ i, i < n → y i = x i }
#align pi_nat.cylinder PiNat.cylinder
theorem cylinder_eq_pi (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) :
cylinder x n = Set.pi (Finset.range n : Set ℕ) fun i : ℕ => {x i} := by
ext y
simp [cylinder]
#align pi_nat.cylinder_eq_pi PiNat.cylinder_eq_pi
@[simp]
theorem cylinder_zero (x : ∀ n, E n) : cylinder x 0 = univ := by simp [cylinder_eq_pi]
#align pi_nat.cylinder_zero PiNat.cylinder_zero
theorem cylinder_anti (x : ∀ n, E n) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : cylinder x n ⊆ cylinder x m :=
fun _y hy i hi => hy i (hi.trans_le h)
#align pi_nat.cylinder_anti PiNat.cylinder_anti
@[simp]
theorem mem_cylinder_iff {x y : ∀ n, E n} {n : ℕ} : y ∈ cylinder x n ↔ ∀ i < n, y i = x i :=
Iff.rfl
#align pi_nat.mem_cylinder_iff PiNat.mem_cylinder_iff
theorem self_mem_cylinder (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) : x ∈ cylinder x n := by simp
#align pi_nat.self_mem_cylinder PiNat.self_mem_cylinder
theorem mem_cylinder_iff_eq {x y : ∀ n, E n} {n : ℕ} :
y ∈ cylinder x n ↔ cylinder y n = cylinder x n := by
constructor
· intro hy
apply Subset.antisymm
· intro z hz i hi
rw [← hy i hi]
exact hz i hi
· intro z hz i hi
rw [hy i hi]
exact hz i hi
· intro h
rw [← h]
exact self_mem_cylinder _ _
#align pi_nat.mem_cylinder_iff_eq PiNat.mem_cylinder_iff_eq
theorem mem_cylinder_comm (x y : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) : y ∈ cylinder x n ↔ x ∈ cylinder y n := by
simp [mem_cylinder_iff_eq, eq_comm]
#align pi_nat.mem_cylinder_comm PiNat.mem_cylinder_comm
theorem mem_cylinder_iff_le_firstDiff {x y : ∀ n, E n} (hne : x ≠ y) (i : ℕ) :
x ∈ cylinder y i ↔ i ≤ firstDiff x y := by
constructor
· intro h
by_contra!
exact apply_firstDiff_ne hne (h _ this)
· intro hi j hj
exact apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff (hj.trans_le hi)
#align pi_nat.mem_cylinder_iff_le_first_diff PiNat.mem_cylinder_iff_le_firstDiff
theorem mem_cylinder_firstDiff (x y : ∀ n, E n) : x ∈ cylinder y (firstDiff x y) := fun _i hi =>
apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff hi
#align pi_nat.mem_cylinder_first_diff PiNat.mem_cylinder_firstDiff
theorem cylinder_eq_cylinder_of_le_firstDiff (x y : ∀ n, E n) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≤ firstDiff x y) :
cylinder x n = cylinder y n := by
rw [← mem_cylinder_iff_eq]
intro i hi
exact apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff (hi.trans_le hn)
#align pi_nat.cylinder_eq_cylinder_of_le_first_diff PiNat.cylinder_eq_cylinder_of_le_firstDiff
theorem iUnion_cylinder_update (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) :
⋃ k, cylinder (update x n k) (n + 1) = cylinder x n := by
ext y
simp only [mem_cylinder_iff, mem_iUnion]
constructor
· rintro ⟨k, hk⟩ i hi
simpa [hi.ne] using hk i (Nat.lt_succ_of_lt hi)
· intro H
refine ⟨y n, fun i hi => ?_⟩
rcases Nat.lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq.1 hi with (h'i | rfl)
· simp [H i h'i, h'i.ne]
· simp
#align pi_nat.Union_cylinder_update PiNat.iUnion_cylinder_update
theorem update_mem_cylinder (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) (y : E n) : update x n y ∈ cylinder x n :=
mem_cylinder_iff.2 fun i hi => by simp [hi.ne]
#align pi_nat.update_mem_cylinder PiNat.update_mem_cylinder
protected def dist : Dist (∀ n, E n) :=
⟨fun x y => if x ≠ y then (1 / 2 : ℝ) ^ firstDiff x y else 0⟩
#align pi_nat.has_dist PiNat.dist
attribute [local instance] PiNat.dist
theorem dist_eq_of_ne {x y : ∀ n, E n} (h : x ≠ y) : dist x y = (1 / 2 : ℝ) ^ firstDiff x y := by
simp [dist, h]
#align pi_nat.dist_eq_of_ne PiNat.dist_eq_of_ne
protected theorem dist_self (x : ∀ n, E n) : dist x x = 0 := by simp [dist]
#align pi_nat.dist_self PiNat.dist_self
protected theorem dist_comm (x y : ∀ n, E n) : dist x y = dist y x := by
simp [dist, @eq_comm _ x y, firstDiff_comm]
#align pi_nat.dist_comm PiNat.dist_comm
protected theorem dist_nonneg (x y : ∀ n, E n) : 0 ≤ dist x y := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | h)
· simp [dist]
· simp [dist, h, zero_le_two]
#align pi_nat.dist_nonneg PiNat.dist_nonneg
theorem dist_triangle_nonarch (x y z : ∀ n, E n) : dist x z ≤ max (dist x y) (dist y z) := by
rcases eq_or_ne x z with (rfl | hxz)
· simp [PiNat.dist_self x, PiNat.dist_nonneg]
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | hxy)
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne y z with (rfl | hyz)
· simp
simp only [dist_eq_of_ne, hxz, hxy, hyz, inv_le_inv, one_div, inv_pow, zero_lt_two, Ne,
not_false_iff, le_max_iff, pow_le_pow_iff_right, one_lt_two, pow_pos,
min_le_iff.1 (min_firstDiff_le x y z hxz)]
#align pi_nat.dist_triangle_nonarch PiNat.dist_triangle_nonarch
protected theorem dist_triangle (x y z : ∀ n, E n) : dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z :=
calc
dist x z ≤ max (dist x y) (dist y z) := dist_triangle_nonarch x y z
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y z := max_le_add_of_nonneg (PiNat.dist_nonneg _ _) (PiNat.dist_nonneg _ _)
#align pi_nat.dist_triangle PiNat.dist_triangle
protected theorem eq_of_dist_eq_zero (x y : ∀ n, E n) (hxy : dist x y = 0) : x = y := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | h); · rfl
simp [dist_eq_of_ne h] at hxy
#align pi_nat.eq_of_dist_eq_zero PiNat.eq_of_dist_eq_zero
theorem mem_cylinder_iff_dist_le {x y : ∀ n, E n} {n : ℕ} :
y ∈ cylinder x n ↔ dist y x ≤ (1 / 2) ^ n := by
rcases eq_or_ne y x with (rfl | hne)
· simp [PiNat.dist_self]
suffices (∀ i : ℕ, i < n → y i = x i) ↔ n ≤ firstDiff y x by simpa [dist_eq_of_ne hne]
constructor
· intro hy
by_contra! H
exact apply_firstDiff_ne hne (hy _ H)
· intro h i hi
exact apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff (hi.trans_le h)
#align pi_nat.mem_cylinder_iff_dist_le PiNat.mem_cylinder_iff_dist_le
theorem apply_eq_of_dist_lt {x y : ∀ n, E n} {n : ℕ} (h : dist x y < (1 / 2) ^ n) {i : ℕ}
(hi : i ≤ n) : x i = y i := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | hne)
· rfl
have : n < firstDiff x y := by
simpa [dist_eq_of_ne hne, inv_lt_inv, pow_lt_pow_iff_right, one_lt_two] using h
exact apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff (hi.trans_lt this)
#align pi_nat.apply_eq_of_dist_lt PiNat.apply_eq_of_dist_lt
theorem lipschitz_with_one_iff_forall_dist_image_le_of_mem_cylinder {α : Type*}
[PseudoMetricSpace α] {f : (∀ n, E n) → α} :
(∀ x y : ∀ n, E n, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ dist x y) ↔
∀ x y n, y ∈ cylinder x n → dist (f x) (f y) ≤ (1 / 2) ^ n := by
constructor
· intro H x y n hxy
apply (H x y).trans
rw [PiNat.dist_comm]
exact mem_cylinder_iff_dist_le.1 hxy
· intro H x y
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | hne)
· simp [PiNat.dist_nonneg]
rw [dist_eq_of_ne hne]
apply H x y (firstDiff x y)
rw [firstDiff_comm]
exact mem_cylinder_firstDiff _ _
#align pi_nat.lipschitz_with_one_iff_forall_dist_image_le_of_mem_cylinder PiNat.lipschitz_with_one_iff_forall_dist_image_le_of_mem_cylinder
variable (E)
variable [∀ n, TopologicalSpace (E n)] [∀ n, DiscreteTopology (E n)]
theorem isOpen_cylinder (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) : IsOpen (cylinder x n) := by
rw [PiNat.cylinder_eq_pi]
exact isOpen_set_pi (Finset.range n).finite_toSet fun a _ => isOpen_discrete _
#align pi_nat.is_open_cylinder PiNat.isOpen_cylinder
theorem isTopologicalBasis_cylinders :
IsTopologicalBasis { s : Set (∀ n, E n) | ∃ (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ), s = cylinder x n } := by
apply isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds
· rintro u ⟨x, n, rfl⟩
apply isOpen_cylinder
· intro x u hx u_open
obtain ⟨v, ⟨U, F, -, rfl⟩, xU, Uu⟩ :
∃ v ∈ { S : Set (∀ i : ℕ, E i) | ∃ (U : ∀ i : ℕ, Set (E i)) (F : Finset ℕ),
(∀ i : ℕ, i ∈ F → U i ∈ { s : Set (E i) | IsOpen s }) ∧ S = (F : Set ℕ).pi U },
x ∈ v ∧ v ⊆ u :=
(isTopologicalBasis_pi fun n : ℕ => isTopologicalBasis_opens).exists_subset_of_mem_open hx
u_open
rcases Finset.bddAbove F with ⟨n, hn⟩
refine ⟨cylinder x (n + 1), ⟨x, n + 1, rfl⟩, self_mem_cylinder _ _, Subset.trans ?_ Uu⟩
intro y hy
suffices ∀ i : ℕ, i ∈ F → y i ∈ U i by simpa
intro i hi
have : y i = x i := mem_cylinder_iff.1 hy i ((hn hi).trans_lt (lt_add_one n))
rw [this]
simp only [Set.mem_pi, Finset.mem_coe] at xU
exact xU i hi
#align pi_nat.is_topological_basis_cylinders PiNat.isTopologicalBasis_cylinders
variable {E}
theorem isOpen_iff_dist (s : Set (∀ n, E n)) :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y, dist x y < ε → y ∈ s := by
constructor
· intro hs x hx
obtain ⟨v, ⟨y, n, rfl⟩, h'x, h's⟩ :
∃ v ∈ { s | ∃ (x : ∀ n : ℕ, E n) (n : ℕ), s = cylinder x n }, x ∈ v ∧ v ⊆ s :=
(isTopologicalBasis_cylinders E).exists_subset_of_mem_open hx hs
rw [← mem_cylinder_iff_eq.1 h'x] at h's
exact
⟨(1 / 2 : ℝ) ^ n, by simp, fun y hy => h's fun i hi => (apply_eq_of_dist_lt hy hi.le).symm⟩
· intro h
refine (isTopologicalBasis_cylinders E).isOpen_iff.2 fun x hx => ?_
rcases h x hx with ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n : ℕ, (1 / 2 : ℝ) ^ n < ε := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one εpos one_half_lt_one
refine ⟨cylinder x n, ⟨x, n, rfl⟩, self_mem_cylinder x n, fun y hy => hε y ?_⟩
rw [PiNat.dist_comm]
exact (mem_cylinder_iff_dist_le.1 hy).trans_lt hn
#align pi_nat.is_open_iff_dist PiNat.isOpen_iff_dist
protected def metricSpace : MetricSpace (∀ n, E n) :=
MetricSpace.ofDistTopology dist PiNat.dist_self PiNat.dist_comm PiNat.dist_triangle
isOpen_iff_dist PiNat.eq_of_dist_eq_zero
#align pi_nat.metric_space PiNat.metricSpace
protected def metricSpaceOfDiscreteUniformity {E : ℕ → Type*} [∀ n, UniformSpace (E n)]
(h : ∀ n, uniformity (E n) = 𝓟 idRel) : MetricSpace (∀ n, E n) :=
haveI : ∀ n, DiscreteTopology (E n) := fun n => discreteTopology_of_discrete_uniformity (h n)
{ dist_triangle := PiNat.dist_triangle
dist_comm := PiNat.dist_comm
dist_self := PiNat.dist_self
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := PiNat.eq_of_dist_eq_zero _ _
edist_dist := fun _ _ ↦ by exact ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq _
toUniformSpace := Pi.uniformSpace _
uniformity_dist := by
simp [Pi.uniformity, comap_iInf, gt_iff_lt, preimage_setOf_eq, comap_principal,
PseudoMetricSpace.uniformity_dist, h, idRel]
apply le_antisymm
· simp only [le_iInf_iff, le_principal_iff]
intro ε εpos
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, (1 / 2 : ℝ) ^ n < ε := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one εpos (by norm_num)
apply
@mem_iInf_of_iInter _ _ _ _ _ (Finset.range n).finite_toSet fun i =>
{ p : (∀ n : ℕ, E n) × ∀ n : ℕ, E n | p.fst i = p.snd i }
· simp only [mem_principal, setOf_subset_setOf, imp_self, imp_true_iff]
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩ hxy
simp only [Finset.mem_coe, Finset.mem_range, iInter_coe_set, mem_iInter, mem_setOf_eq]
at hxy
apply lt_of_le_of_lt _ hn
rw [← mem_cylinder_iff_dist_le, mem_cylinder_iff]
exact hxy
· simp only [le_iInf_iff, le_principal_iff]
intro n
refine mem_iInf_of_mem ((1 / 2) ^ n : ℝ) ?_
refine mem_iInf_of_mem (by positivity) ?_
simp only [mem_principal, setOf_subset_setOf, Prod.forall]
intro x y hxy
exact apply_eq_of_dist_lt hxy le_rfl }
#align pi_nat.metric_space_of_discrete_uniformity PiNat.metricSpaceOfDiscreteUniformity
def metricSpaceNatNat : MetricSpace (ℕ → ℕ) :=
PiNat.metricSpaceOfDiscreteUniformity fun _ => rfl
#align pi_nat.metric_space_nat_nat PiNat.metricSpaceNatNat
attribute [local instance] PiNat.metricSpace
protected theorem completeSpace : CompleteSpace (∀ n, E n) := by
refine Metric.complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences (fun n => (1 / 2) ^ n) (by simp) ?_
intro u hu
refine ⟨fun n => u n n, tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun i => ?_⟩
refine tendsto_const_nhds.congr' ?_
filter_upwards [Filter.Ici_mem_atTop i] with n hn
exact apply_eq_of_dist_lt (hu i i n le_rfl hn) le_rfl
#align pi_nat.complete_space PiNat.completeSpace
theorem exists_disjoint_cylinder {s : Set (∀ n, E n)} (hs : IsClosed s) {x : ∀ n, E n}
(hx : x ∉ s) : ∃ n, Disjoint s (cylinder x n) := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | hne)
· exact ⟨0, by simp⟩
have A : 0 < infDist x s := (hs.not_mem_iff_infDist_pos hne).1 hx
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, (1 / 2 : ℝ) ^ n < infDist x s := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one A one_half_lt_one
refine ⟨n, disjoint_left.2 fun y ys hy => ?_⟩
apply lt_irrefl (infDist x s)
calc
infDist x s ≤ dist x y := infDist_le_dist_of_mem ys
_ ≤ (1 / 2) ^ n := by
rw [mem_cylinder_comm] at hy
exact mem_cylinder_iff_dist_le.1 hy
_ < infDist x s := hn
#align pi_nat.exists_disjoint_cylinder PiNat.exists_disjoint_cylinder
def shortestPrefixDiff {E : ℕ → Type*} (x : ∀ n, E n) (s : Set (∀ n, E n)) : ℕ :=
if h : ∃ n, Disjoint s (cylinder x n) then Nat.find h else 0
#align pi_nat.shortest_prefix_diff PiNat.shortestPrefixDiff
theorem firstDiff_lt_shortestPrefixDiff {s : Set (∀ n, E n)} (hs : IsClosed s) {x y : ∀ n, E n}
(hx : x ∉ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : firstDiff x y < shortestPrefixDiff x s := by
have A := exists_disjoint_cylinder hs hx
rw [shortestPrefixDiff, dif_pos A]
have B := Nat.find_spec A
contrapose! B
rw [not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
refine ⟨y, hy, ?_⟩
rw [mem_cylinder_comm]
exact cylinder_anti y B (mem_cylinder_firstDiff x y)
#align pi_nat.first_diff_lt_shortest_prefix_diff PiNat.firstDiff_lt_shortestPrefixDiff
theorem shortestPrefixDiff_pos {s : Set (∀ n, E n)} (hs : IsClosed s) (hne : s.Nonempty)
{x : ∀ n, E n} (hx : x ∉ s) : 0 < shortestPrefixDiff x s := by
rcases hne with ⟨y, hy⟩
exact (zero_le _).trans_lt (firstDiff_lt_shortestPrefixDiff hs hx hy)
#align pi_nat.shortest_prefix_diff_pos PiNat.shortestPrefixDiff_pos
def longestPrefix {E : ℕ → Type*} (x : ∀ n, E n) (s : Set (∀ n, E n)) : ℕ :=
shortestPrefixDiff x s - 1
#align pi_nat.longest_prefix PiNat.longestPrefix
theorem firstDiff_le_longestPrefix {s : Set (∀ n, E n)} (hs : IsClosed s) {x y : ∀ n, E n}
(hx : x ∉ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : firstDiff x y ≤ longestPrefix x s := by
rw [longestPrefix, le_tsub_iff_right]
· exact firstDiff_lt_shortestPrefixDiff hs hx hy
· exact shortestPrefixDiff_pos hs ⟨y, hy⟩ hx
#align pi_nat.first_diff_le_longest_prefix PiNat.firstDiff_le_longestPrefix
theorem inter_cylinder_longestPrefix_nonempty {s : Set (∀ n, E n)} (hs : IsClosed s)
(hne : s.Nonempty) (x : ∀ n, E n) : (s ∩ cylinder x (longestPrefix x s)).Nonempty := by
by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· exact ⟨x, hx, self_mem_cylinder _ _⟩
have A := exists_disjoint_cylinder hs hx
have B : longestPrefix x s < shortestPrefixDiff x s :=
Nat.pred_lt (shortestPrefixDiff_pos hs hne hx).ne'
rw [longestPrefix, shortestPrefixDiff, dif_pos A] at B ⊢
obtain ⟨y, ys, hy⟩ : ∃ y : ∀ n : ℕ, E n, y ∈ s ∧ x ∈ cylinder y (Nat.find A - 1) := by
simpa only [not_disjoint_iff, mem_cylinder_comm] using Nat.find_min A B
refine ⟨y, ys, ?_⟩
rw [mem_cylinder_iff_eq] at hy ⊢
rw [hy]
#align pi_nat.inter_cylinder_longest_prefix_nonempty PiNat.inter_cylinder_longestPrefix_nonempty
theorem disjoint_cylinder_of_longestPrefix_lt {s : Set (∀ n, E n)} (hs : IsClosed s) {x : ∀ n, E n}
(hx : x ∉ s) {n : ℕ} (hn : longestPrefix x s < n) : Disjoint s (cylinder x n) := by
contrapose! hn
rcases not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter.1 hn with ⟨y, ys, hy⟩
apply le_trans _ (firstDiff_le_longestPrefix hs hx ys)
apply (mem_cylinder_iff_le_firstDiff (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem ys hx).symm _).1
rwa [mem_cylinder_comm]
#align pi_nat.disjoint_cylinder_of_longest_prefix_lt PiNat.disjoint_cylinder_of_longestPrefix_lt
theorem cylinder_longestPrefix_eq_of_longestPrefix_lt_firstDiff {x y : ∀ n, E n}
{s : Set (∀ n, E n)} (hs : IsClosed s) (hne : s.Nonempty)
(H : longestPrefix x s < firstDiff x y) (xs : x ∉ s) (ys : y ∉ s) :
cylinder x (longestPrefix x s) = cylinder y (longestPrefix y s) := by
have l_eq : longestPrefix y s = longestPrefix x s := by
rcases lt_trichotomy (longestPrefix y s) (longestPrefix x s) with (L | L | L)
· have Ax : (s ∩ cylinder x (longestPrefix x s)).Nonempty :=
inter_cylinder_longestPrefix_nonempty hs hne x
have Z := disjoint_cylinder_of_longestPrefix_lt hs ys L
rw [firstDiff_comm] at H
rw [cylinder_eq_cylinder_of_le_firstDiff _ _ H.le] at Z
exact (Ax.not_disjoint Z).elim
· exact L
· have Ay : (s ∩ cylinder y (longestPrefix y s)).Nonempty :=
inter_cylinder_longestPrefix_nonempty hs hne y
have A'y : (s ∩ cylinder y (longestPrefix x s).succ).Nonempty :=
Ay.mono (inter_subset_inter_right s (cylinder_anti _ L))
have Z := disjoint_cylinder_of_longestPrefix_lt hs xs (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
rw [cylinder_eq_cylinder_of_le_firstDiff _ _ H] at Z
exact (A'y.not_disjoint Z).elim
rw [l_eq, ← mem_cylinder_iff_eq]
exact cylinder_anti y H.le (mem_cylinder_firstDiff x y)
#align pi_nat.cylinder_longest_prefix_eq_of_longest_prefix_lt_first_diff PiNat.cylinder_longestPrefix_eq_of_longestPrefix_lt_firstDiff
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/PiNat.lean | 595 | 694 | theorem exists_lipschitz_retraction_of_isClosed {s : Set (∀ n, E n)} (hs : IsClosed s)
(hne : s.Nonempty) :
∃ f : (∀ n, E n) → ∀ n, E n, (∀ x ∈ s, f x = x) ∧ range f = s ∧ LipschitzWith 1 f := by |
/- The map `f` is defined as follows. For `x ∈ s`, let `f x = x`. Otherwise, consider the longest
prefix `w` that `x` shares with an element of `s`, and let `f x = z_w` where `z_w` is an element
of `s` starting with `w`. All the desired properties are clear, except the fact that `f` is
`1`-Lipschitz: if two points `x, y` belong to a common cylinder of length `n`, one should show
that their images also belong to a common cylinder of length `n`. This is a case analysis:
* if both `x, y ∈ s`, then this is clear.
* if `x ∈ s` but `y ∉ s`, then the longest prefix `w` of `y` shared by an element of `s` is of
length at least `n` (because of `x`), and then `f y` starts with `w` and therefore stays in the
same length `n` cylinder.
* if `x ∉ s`, `y ∉ s`, let `w` be the longest prefix of `x` shared by an element of `s`. If its
length is `< n`, then it is also the longest prefix of `y`, and we get `f x = f y = z_w`.
Otherwise, `f x` remains in the same `n`-cylinder as `x`. Similarly for `y`. Finally, `f x` and
`f y` are again in the same `n`-cylinder, as desired. -/
set f := fun x => if x ∈ s then x else (inter_cylinder_longestPrefix_nonempty hs hne x).some
have fs : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = x := fun x xs => by simp [f, xs]
refine ⟨f, fs, ?_, ?_⟩
-- check that the range of `f` is `s`.
· apply Subset.antisymm
· rintro x ⟨y, rfl⟩
by_cases hy : y ∈ s
· rwa [fs y hy]
simpa [f, if_neg hy] using (inter_cylinder_longestPrefix_nonempty hs hne y).choose_spec.1
· intro x hx
rw [← fs x hx]
exact mem_range_self _
-- check that `f` is `1`-Lipschitz, by a case analysis.
· refine LipschitzWith.mk_one fun x y => ?_
-- exclude the trivial cases where `x = y`, or `f x = f y`.
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | hxy)
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne (f x) (f y) with (h' | hfxfy)
· simp [h', dist_nonneg]
have I2 : cylinder x (firstDiff x y) = cylinder y (firstDiff x y) := by
rw [← mem_cylinder_iff_eq]
apply mem_cylinder_firstDiff
suffices firstDiff x y ≤ firstDiff (f x) (f y) by
simpa [dist_eq_of_ne hxy, dist_eq_of_ne hfxfy]
-- case where `x ∈ s`
by_cases xs : x ∈ s
· rw [fs x xs] at hfxfy ⊢
-- case where `y ∈ s`, trivial
by_cases ys : y ∈ s
· rw [fs y ys]
-- case where `y ∉ s`
have A : (s ∩ cylinder y (longestPrefix y s)).Nonempty :=
inter_cylinder_longestPrefix_nonempty hs hne y
have fy : f y = A.some := by simp_rw [f, if_neg ys]
have I : cylinder A.some (firstDiff x y) = cylinder y (firstDiff x y) := by
rw [← mem_cylinder_iff_eq, firstDiff_comm]
apply cylinder_anti y _ A.some_mem.2
exact firstDiff_le_longestPrefix hs ys xs
rwa [← fy, ← I2, ← mem_cylinder_iff_eq, mem_cylinder_iff_le_firstDiff hfxfy.symm,
firstDiff_comm _ x] at I
-- case where `x ∉ s`
· by_cases ys : y ∈ s
-- case where `y ∈ s` (similar to the above)
· have A : (s ∩ cylinder x (longestPrefix x s)).Nonempty :=
inter_cylinder_longestPrefix_nonempty hs hne x
have fx : f x = A.some := by simp_rw [f, if_neg xs]
have I : cylinder A.some (firstDiff x y) = cylinder x (firstDiff x y) := by
rw [← mem_cylinder_iff_eq]
apply cylinder_anti x _ A.some_mem.2
apply firstDiff_le_longestPrefix hs xs ys
rw [fs y ys] at hfxfy ⊢
rwa [← fx, I2, ← mem_cylinder_iff_eq, mem_cylinder_iff_le_firstDiff hfxfy] at I
-- case where `y ∉ s`
· have Ax : (s ∩ cylinder x (longestPrefix x s)).Nonempty :=
inter_cylinder_longestPrefix_nonempty hs hne x
have fx : f x = Ax.some := by simp_rw [f, if_neg xs]
have Ay : (s ∩ cylinder y (longestPrefix y s)).Nonempty :=
inter_cylinder_longestPrefix_nonempty hs hne y
have fy : f y = Ay.some := by simp_rw [f, if_neg ys]
-- case where the common prefix to `x` and `s`, or `y` and `s`, is shorter than the
-- common part to `x` and `y` -- then `f x = f y`.
by_cases H : longestPrefix x s < firstDiff x y ∨ longestPrefix y s < firstDiff x y
· have : cylinder x (longestPrefix x s) = cylinder y (longestPrefix y s) := by
cases' H with H H
· exact cylinder_longestPrefix_eq_of_longestPrefix_lt_firstDiff hs hne H xs ys
· symm
rw [firstDiff_comm] at H
exact cylinder_longestPrefix_eq_of_longestPrefix_lt_firstDiff hs hne H ys xs
rw [fx, fy] at hfxfy
apply (hfxfy _).elim
congr
-- case where the common prefix to `x` and `s` is long, as well as the common prefix to
-- `y` and `s`. Then all points remain in the same cylinders.
· push_neg at H
have I1 : cylinder Ax.some (firstDiff x y) = cylinder x (firstDiff x y) := by
rw [← mem_cylinder_iff_eq]
exact cylinder_anti x H.1 Ax.some_mem.2
have I3 : cylinder y (firstDiff x y) = cylinder Ay.some (firstDiff x y) := by
rw [eq_comm, ← mem_cylinder_iff_eq]
exact cylinder_anti y H.2 Ay.some_mem.2
have : cylinder Ax.some (firstDiff x y) = cylinder Ay.some (firstDiff x y) := by
rw [I1, I2, I3]
rw [← fx, ← fy, ← mem_cylinder_iff_eq, mem_cylinder_iff_le_firstDiff hfxfy] at this
exact this
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Combination
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Independent
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
#align_import analysis.convex.caratheodory from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e6fab1dc073396d45da082c644642c4f8bff2264"
open Set Finset
universe u
variable {𝕜 : Type*} {E : Type u} [LinearOrderedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
namespace Caratheodory
theorem mem_convexHull_erase [DecidableEq E] {t : Finset E} (h : ¬AffineIndependent 𝕜 ((↑) : t → E))
{x : E} (m : x ∈ convexHull 𝕜 (↑t : Set E)) :
∃ y : (↑t : Set E), x ∈ convexHull 𝕜 (↑(t.erase y) : Set E) := by
simp only [Finset.convexHull_eq, mem_setOf_eq] at m ⊢
obtain ⟨f, fpos, fsum, rfl⟩ := m
obtain ⟨g, gcombo, gsum, gpos⟩ := exists_nontrivial_relation_sum_zero_of_not_affine_ind h
replace gpos := exists_pos_of_sum_zero_of_exists_nonzero g gsum gpos
clear h
let s := @Finset.filter _ (fun z => 0 < g z) (fun _ => LinearOrder.decidableLT _ _) t
obtain ⟨i₀, mem, w⟩ : ∃ i₀ ∈ s, ∀ i ∈ s, f i₀ / g i₀ ≤ f i / g i := by
apply s.exists_min_image fun z => f z / g z
obtain ⟨x, hx, hgx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ t, 0 < g x := gpos
exact ⟨x, mem_filter.mpr ⟨hx, hgx⟩⟩
have hg : 0 < g i₀ := by
rw [mem_filter] at mem
exact mem.2
have hi₀ : i₀ ∈ t := filter_subset _ _ mem
let k : E → 𝕜 := fun z => f z - f i₀ / g i₀ * g z
have hk : k i₀ = 0 := by field_simp [k, ne_of_gt hg]
have ksum : ∑ e ∈ t.erase i₀, k e = 1 := by
calc
∑ e ∈ t.erase i₀, k e = ∑ e ∈ t, k e := by
conv_rhs => rw [← insert_erase hi₀, sum_insert (not_mem_erase i₀ t), hk, zero_add]
_ = ∑ e ∈ t, (f e - f i₀ / g i₀ * g e) := rfl
_ = 1 := by rw [sum_sub_distrib, fsum, ← mul_sum, gsum, mul_zero, sub_zero]
refine ⟨⟨i₀, hi₀⟩, k, ?_, by convert ksum, ?_⟩
· simp only [k, and_imp, sub_nonneg, mem_erase, Ne, Subtype.coe_mk]
intro e _ het
by_cases hes : e ∈ s
· have hge : 0 < g e := by
rw [mem_filter] at hes
exact hes.2
rw [← le_div_iff hge]
exact w _ hes
· calc
_ ≤ 0 := by
apply mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos
· apply div_nonneg (fpos i₀ (mem_of_subset (filter_subset _ t) mem)) (le_of_lt hg)
· simpa only [s, mem_filter, het, true_and_iff, not_lt] using hes
_ ≤ f e := fpos e het
· rw [Subtype.coe_mk, centerMass_eq_of_sum_1 _ id ksum]
calc
∑ e ∈ t.erase i₀, k e • e = ∑ e ∈ t, k e • e := sum_erase _ (by rw [hk, zero_smul])
_ = ∑ e ∈ t, (f e - f i₀ / g i₀ * g e) • e := rfl
_ = t.centerMass f id := by
simp only [sub_smul, mul_smul, sum_sub_distrib, ← smul_sum, gcombo, smul_zero, sub_zero,
centerMass, fsum, inv_one, one_smul, id]
#align caratheodory.mem_convex_hull_erase Caratheodory.mem_convexHull_erase
variable {s : Set E} {x : E} (hx : x ∈ convexHull 𝕜 s)
noncomputable def minCardFinsetOfMemConvexHull : Finset E :=
Function.argminOn Finset.card Nat.lt_wfRel.2 { t | ↑t ⊆ s ∧ x ∈ convexHull 𝕜 (t : Set E) } <| by
simpa only [convexHull_eq_union_convexHull_finite_subsets s, exists_prop, mem_iUnion] using hx
#align caratheodory.min_card_finset_of_mem_convex_hull Caratheodory.minCardFinsetOfMemConvexHull
theorem minCardFinsetOfMemConvexHull_subseteq : ↑(minCardFinsetOfMemConvexHull hx) ⊆ s :=
(Function.argminOn_mem _ _ { t : Finset E | ↑t ⊆ s ∧ x ∈ convexHull 𝕜 (t : Set E) } _).1
#align caratheodory.min_card_finset_of_mem_convex_hull_subseteq Caratheodory.minCardFinsetOfMemConvexHull_subseteq
theorem mem_minCardFinsetOfMemConvexHull :
x ∈ convexHull 𝕜 (minCardFinsetOfMemConvexHull hx : Set E) :=
(Function.argminOn_mem _ _ { t : Finset E | ↑t ⊆ s ∧ x ∈ convexHull 𝕜 (t : Set E) } _).2
#align caratheodory.mem_min_card_finset_of_mem_convex_hull Caratheodory.mem_minCardFinsetOfMemConvexHull
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Caratheodory.lean | 119 | 121 | theorem minCardFinsetOfMemConvexHull_nonempty : (minCardFinsetOfMemConvexHull hx).Nonempty := by |
rw [← Finset.coe_nonempty, ← @convexHull_nonempty_iff 𝕜]
exact ⟨x, mem_minCardFinsetOfMemConvexHull hx⟩
|
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.Affine
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.RightAngle
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.oriented.right_angle from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"46b633fd842bef9469441c0209906f6dddd2b4f5"
noncomputable section
open scoped EuclideanGeometry
open scoped Real
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
namespace Orientation
open FiniteDimensional
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V]
variable [hd2 : Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
theorem oangle_add_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle x (x + y) = Real.arccos (‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arccos_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_add_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x + y) y = Real.arccos (‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_add_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle x (x + y) = Real.arcsin (‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arcsin_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_add_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x + y) y = Real.arcsin (‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle x (x + y) = Real.arctan (‖y‖ / ‖x‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arctan_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h) (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_add_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x + y) y = Real.arctan (‖x‖ / ‖y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero (o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.sin_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero (o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖y‖ / ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.tan_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero (o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem tan_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x‖ / ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.tan_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.tan_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem cos_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x (x + y)) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.cos_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.cos_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem cos_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x + y) y) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).cos_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.cos_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.cos_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem sin_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle x (x + y)) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.sin_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.sin_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.sin_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem sin_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x + y) y) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).sin_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.sin_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.sin_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem tan_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle x (x + y)) * ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.tan_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.tan_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.tan_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem tan_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x + y) y) * ‖y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).tan_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.tan_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.tan_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem norm_div_cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_cos_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.norm_div_cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.norm_div_cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem norm_div_cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).norm_div_cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.norm_div_cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.norm_div_cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem norm_div_sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_sin_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inr (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.norm_div_sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.norm_div_sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem norm_div_sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).norm_div_sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.norm_div_sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.norm_div_sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem norm_div_tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_tan_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inr (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.norm_div_tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.norm_div_tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem norm_div_tan_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).norm_div_tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.norm_div_tan_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.norm_div_tan_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_sub_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle y (y - x) = Real.arccos (‖y‖ / ‖y - x‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_sub_eq_arccos_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.oangle_sub_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_sub_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_sub_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x - y) x = Real.arccos (‖x‖ / ‖x - y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).oangle_sub_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.oangle_sub_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_sub_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_sub_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle y (y - x) = Real.arcsin (‖x‖ / ‖y - x‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_sub_eq_arcsin_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.oangle_sub_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_sub_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_sub_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x - y) x = Real.arcsin (‖y‖ / ‖x - y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).oangle_sub_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.oangle_sub_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_sub_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_sub_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle y (y - x) = Real.arctan (‖x‖ / ‖y‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_sub_eq_arctan_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h) (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.oangle_sub_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_sub_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_sub_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x - y) x = Real.arctan (‖y‖ / ‖x‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).oangle_sub_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.oangle_sub_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_sub_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem cos_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle y (y - x)) = ‖y‖ / ‖y - x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.cos_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.cos_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem cos_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x - y) x) = ‖x‖ / ‖x - y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).cos_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.cos_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.cos_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem sin_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle y (y - x)) = ‖x‖ / ‖y - x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.sin_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.sin_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.sin_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem sin_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x - y) x) = ‖y‖ / ‖x - y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).sin_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.sin_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.sin_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem tan_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle y (y - x)) = ‖x‖ / ‖y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.tan_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.tan_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.tan_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem tan_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x - y) x) = ‖y‖ / ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).tan_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.tan_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.tan_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem cos_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle y (y - x)) * ‖y - x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle_sub_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.cos_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.cos_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem cos_oangle_sub_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x - y) x) * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).cos_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.cos_oangle_sub_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.cos_oangle_sub_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem sin_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle y (y - x)) * ‖y - x‖ = ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.sin_angle_sub_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.sin_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.sin_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem sin_oangle_sub_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x - y) x) * ‖x - y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).sin_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.sin_oangle_sub_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.sin_oangle_sub_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem tan_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle y (y - x)) * ‖y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.tan_angle_sub_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.tan_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.tan_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem tan_oangle_sub_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x - y) x) * ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).tan_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.tan_oangle_sub_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.tan_oangle_sub_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem norm_div_cos_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle y (y - x)) = ‖y - x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_cos_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.norm_div_cos_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.norm_div_cos_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem norm_div_cos_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x - y) x) = ‖x - y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).norm_div_cos_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.norm_div_cos_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.norm_div_cos_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem norm_div_sin_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle y (y - x)) = ‖y - x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_sin_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inr (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.norm_div_sin_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.norm_div_sin_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem norm_div_sin_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x - y) x) = ‖x - y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).norm_div_sin_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.norm_div_sin_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.norm_div_sin_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem norm_div_tan_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle y (y - x)) = ‖y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_tan_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inr (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.norm_div_tan_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.norm_div_tan_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem norm_div_tan_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x - y) x) = ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).norm_div_tan_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.norm_div_tan_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.norm_div_tan_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_add_right_smul_rotation_pi_div_two {x : V} (h : x ≠ 0) (r : ℝ) :
o.oangle x (x + r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x) = Real.arctan r := by
rcases lt_trichotomy r 0 with (hr | rfl | hr)
· have ha : o.oangle x (r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x) = -(π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [o.oangle_smul_right_of_neg _ _ hr, o.oangle_neg_right h, o.oangle_rotation_self_right h, ←
sub_eq_zero, add_comm, sub_neg_eq_add, ← Real.Angle.coe_add, ← Real.Angle.coe_add,
add_assoc, add_halves, ← two_mul, Real.Angle.coe_two_pi]
simpa using h
-- Porting note: if the type is not given in `neg_neg` then Lean "forgets" about the instance
-- `Neg (Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))`
rw [← neg_inj, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, @neg_neg Real.Angle] at ha
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj, oangle_rev,
(-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two ha, norm_smul,
LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map, mul_div_assoc, div_self (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 h), mul_one,
Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_neg hr, Real.arctan_neg, Real.Angle.coe_neg, neg_neg]
· rw [zero_smul, add_zero, oangle_self, Real.arctan_zero, Real.Angle.coe_zero]
· have ha : o.oangle x (r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x) = (π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [o.oangle_smul_right_of_pos _ _ hr, o.oangle_rotation_self_right h]
rw [o.oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two ha, norm_smul,
LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map, mul_div_assoc, div_self (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 h), mul_one,
Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_pos hr]
#align orientation.oangle_add_right_smul_rotation_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_right_smul_rotation_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_add_left_smul_rotation_pi_div_two {x : V} (h : x ≠ 0) (r : ℝ) :
o.oangle (x + r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x) (r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x)
= Real.arctan r⁻¹ := by
by_cases hr : r = 0; · simp [hr]
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj, ←
neg_neg ((π / 2 : ℝ) : Real.Angle), ← rotation_neg_orientation_eq_neg, add_comm]
have hx : x = r⁻¹ • (-o).rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) (r • (-o).rotation (-(π / 2 : ℝ)) x) := by simp [hr]
nth_rw 3 [hx]
refine (-o).oangle_add_right_smul_rotation_pi_div_two ?_ _
simp [hr, h]
#align orientation.oangle_add_left_smul_rotation_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_left_smul_rotation_pi_div_two
theorem tan_oangle_add_right_smul_rotation_pi_div_two {x : V} (h : x ≠ 0) (r : ℝ) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle x (x + r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x)) = r := by
rw [o.oangle_add_right_smul_rotation_pi_div_two h, Real.Angle.tan_coe, Real.tan_arctan]
#align orientation.tan_oangle_add_right_smul_rotation_pi_div_two Orientation.tan_oangle_add_right_smul_rotation_pi_div_two
theorem tan_oangle_add_left_smul_rotation_pi_div_two {x : V} (h : x ≠ 0) (r : ℝ) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x + r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x) (r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x)) =
r⁻¹ := by
rw [o.oangle_add_left_smul_rotation_pi_div_two h, Real.Angle.tan_coe, Real.tan_arctan]
#align orientation.tan_oangle_add_left_smul_rotation_pi_div_two Orientation.tan_oangle_add_left_smul_rotation_pi_div_two
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/RightAngle.lean | 550 | 557 | theorem oangle_sub_right_smul_rotation_pi_div_two {x : V} (h : x ≠ 0) (r : ℝ) :
o.oangle (r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x) (r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x - x)
= Real.arctan r⁻¹ := by |
by_cases hr : r = 0; · simp [hr]
have hx : -x = r⁻¹ • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) (r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x) := by
simp [hr, ← Real.Angle.coe_add]
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, hx, o.oangle_add_right_smul_rotation_pi_div_two]
simpa [hr] using h
|
import Mathlib.AlgebraicTopology.SimplexCategory
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Comma.Arrow
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.FunctorCategory
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Opposites
#align_import algebraic_topology.simplicial_object from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5ed51dc37c6b891b79314ee11a50adc2b1df6fd6"
open Opposite
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits
universe v u v' u'
namespace CategoryTheory
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C]
-- porting note (#5171): removed @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
def SimplicialObject :=
SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ ⥤ C
#align category_theory.simplicial_object CategoryTheory.SimplicialObject
@[simps!]
instance : Category (SimplicialObject C) := by
dsimp only [SimplicialObject]
infer_instance
namespace SimplicialObject
set_option quotPrecheck false in
scoped[Simplicial]
notation3:1000 X " _[" n "]" =>
(X : CategoryTheory.SimplicialObject _).obj (Opposite.op (SimplexCategory.mk n))
open Simplicial
instance {J : Type v} [SmallCategory J] [HasLimitsOfShape J C] :
HasLimitsOfShape J (SimplicialObject C) := by
dsimp [SimplicialObject]
infer_instance
instance [HasLimits C] : HasLimits (SimplicialObject C) :=
⟨inferInstance⟩
instance {J : Type v} [SmallCategory J] [HasColimitsOfShape J C] :
HasColimitsOfShape J (SimplicialObject C) := by
dsimp [SimplicialObject]
infer_instance
instance [HasColimits C] : HasColimits (SimplicialObject C) :=
⟨inferInstance⟩
variable {C}
-- Porting note (#10688): added to ease automation
@[ext]
lemma hom_ext {X Y : SimplicialObject C} (f g : X ⟶ Y)
(h : ∀ (n : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ), f.app n = g.app n) : f = g :=
NatTrans.ext _ _ (by ext; apply h)
variable (X : SimplicialObject C)
def δ {n} (i : Fin (n + 2)) : X _[n + 1] ⟶ X _[n] :=
X.map (SimplexCategory.δ i).op
#align category_theory.simplicial_object.δ CategoryTheory.SimplicialObject.δ
def σ {n} (i : Fin (n + 1)) : X _[n] ⟶ X _[n + 1] :=
X.map (SimplexCategory.σ i).op
#align category_theory.simplicial_object.σ CategoryTheory.SimplicialObject.σ
def eqToIso {n m : ℕ} (h : n = m) : X _[n] ≅ X _[m] :=
X.mapIso (CategoryTheory.eqToIso (by congr))
#align category_theory.simplicial_object.eq_to_iso CategoryTheory.SimplicialObject.eqToIso
@[simp]
theorem eqToIso_refl {n : ℕ} (h : n = n) : X.eqToIso h = Iso.refl _ := by
ext
simp [eqToIso]
#align category_theory.simplicial_object.eq_to_iso_refl CategoryTheory.SimplicialObject.eqToIso_refl
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_δ {n} {i j : Fin (n + 2)} (H : i ≤ j) :
X.δ j.succ ≫ X.δ i = X.δ (Fin.castSucc i) ≫ X.δ j := by
dsimp [δ]
simp only [← X.map_comp, ← op_comp, SimplexCategory.δ_comp_δ H]
#align category_theory.simplicial_object.δ_comp_δ CategoryTheory.SimplicialObject.δ_comp_δ
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_δ' {n} {i : Fin (n + 2)} {j : Fin (n + 3)} (H : Fin.castSucc i < j) :
X.δ j ≫ X.δ i =
X.δ (Fin.castSucc i) ≫
X.δ (j.pred fun (hj : j = 0) => by simp [hj, Fin.not_lt_zero] at H) := by
dsimp [δ]
simp only [← X.map_comp, ← op_comp, SimplexCategory.δ_comp_δ' H]
#align category_theory.simplicial_object.δ_comp_δ' CategoryTheory.SimplicialObject.δ_comp_δ'
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_δ'' {n} {i : Fin (n + 3)} {j : Fin (n + 2)} (H : i ≤ Fin.castSucc j) :
X.δ j.succ ≫ X.δ (i.castLT (Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Fin.le_iff_val_le_val.mp H) j.is_lt)) =
X.δ i ≫ X.δ j := by
dsimp [δ]
simp only [← X.map_comp, ← op_comp, SimplexCategory.δ_comp_δ'' H]
#align category_theory.simplicial_object.δ_comp_δ'' CategoryTheory.SimplicialObject.δ_comp_δ''
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_δ_self {n} {i : Fin (n + 2)} :
X.δ (Fin.castSucc i) ≫ X.δ i = X.δ i.succ ≫ X.δ i := by
dsimp [δ]
simp only [← X.map_comp, ← op_comp, SimplexCategory.δ_comp_δ_self]
#align category_theory.simplicial_object.δ_comp_δ_self CategoryTheory.SimplicialObject.δ_comp_δ_self
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_δ_self' {n} {j : Fin (n + 3)} {i : Fin (n + 2)} (H : j = Fin.castSucc i) :
X.δ j ≫ X.δ i = X.δ i.succ ≫ X.δ i := by
subst H
rw [δ_comp_δ_self]
#align category_theory.simplicial_object.δ_comp_δ_self' CategoryTheory.SimplicialObject.δ_comp_δ_self'
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_σ_of_le {n} {i : Fin (n + 2)} {j : Fin (n + 1)} (H : i ≤ Fin.castSucc j) :
X.σ j.succ ≫ X.δ (Fin.castSucc i) = X.δ i ≫ X.σ j := by
dsimp [δ, σ]
simp only [← X.map_comp, ← op_comp, SimplexCategory.δ_comp_σ_of_le H]
#align category_theory.simplicial_object.δ_comp_σ_of_le CategoryTheory.SimplicialObject.δ_comp_σ_of_le
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_σ_self {n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} : X.σ i ≫ X.δ (Fin.castSucc i) = 𝟙 _ := by
dsimp [δ, σ]
simp only [← X.map_comp, ← op_comp, SimplexCategory.δ_comp_σ_self, op_id, X.map_id]
#align category_theory.simplicial_object.δ_comp_σ_self CategoryTheory.SimplicialObject.δ_comp_σ_self
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_σ_self' {n} {j : Fin (n + 2)} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (H : j = Fin.castSucc i) :
X.σ i ≫ X.δ j = 𝟙 _ := by
subst H
rw [δ_comp_σ_self]
#align category_theory.simplicial_object.δ_comp_σ_self' CategoryTheory.SimplicialObject.δ_comp_σ_self'
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_σ_succ {n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} : X.σ i ≫ X.δ i.succ = 𝟙 _ := by
dsimp [δ, σ]
simp only [← X.map_comp, ← op_comp, SimplexCategory.δ_comp_σ_succ, op_id, X.map_id]
#align category_theory.simplicial_object.δ_comp_σ_succ CategoryTheory.SimplicialObject.δ_comp_σ_succ
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_σ_succ' {n} {j : Fin (n + 2)} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (H : j = i.succ) :
X.σ i ≫ X.δ j = 𝟙 _ := by
subst H
rw [δ_comp_σ_succ]
#align category_theory.simplicial_object.δ_comp_σ_succ' CategoryTheory.SimplicialObject.δ_comp_σ_succ'
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_σ_of_gt {n} {i : Fin (n + 2)} {j : Fin (n + 1)} (H : Fin.castSucc j < i) :
X.σ (Fin.castSucc j) ≫ X.δ i.succ = X.δ i ≫ X.σ j := by
dsimp [δ, σ]
simp only [← X.map_comp, ← op_comp, SimplexCategory.δ_comp_σ_of_gt H]
#align category_theory.simplicial_object.δ_comp_σ_of_gt CategoryTheory.SimplicialObject.δ_comp_σ_of_gt
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_σ_of_gt' {n} {i : Fin (n + 3)} {j : Fin (n + 2)} (H : j.succ < i) :
X.σ j ≫ X.δ i =
X.δ (i.pred fun (hi : i = 0) => by simp only [Fin.not_lt_zero, hi] at H) ≫
X.σ (j.castLT ((add_lt_add_iff_right 1).mp (lt_of_lt_of_le H i.is_le))) := by
dsimp [δ, σ]
simp only [← X.map_comp, ← op_comp, SimplexCategory.δ_comp_σ_of_gt' H]
#align category_theory.simplicial_object.δ_comp_σ_of_gt' CategoryTheory.SimplicialObject.δ_comp_σ_of_gt'
@[reassoc]
| Mathlib/AlgebraicTopology/SimplicialObject.lean | 199 | 202 | theorem σ_comp_σ {n} {i j : Fin (n + 1)} (H : i ≤ j) :
X.σ j ≫ X.σ (Fin.castSucc i) = X.σ i ≫ X.σ j.succ := by |
dsimp [δ, σ]
simp only [← X.map_comp, ← op_comp, SimplexCategory.σ_comp_σ H]
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Contraction
variable {R M : Type*}
variable [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] {Q : QuadraticForm R M}
namespace CliffordAlgebra
variable (Q)
def invertibleιOfInvertible (m : M) [Invertible (Q m)] : Invertible (ι Q m) where
invOf := ι Q (⅟ (Q m) • m)
invOf_mul_self := by
rw [map_smul, smul_mul_assoc, ι_sq_scalar, Algebra.smul_def, ← map_mul, invOf_mul_self, map_one]
mul_invOf_self := by
rw [map_smul, mul_smul_comm, ι_sq_scalar, Algebra.smul_def, ← map_mul, invOf_mul_self, map_one]
#align clifford_algebra.invertible_ι_of_invertible CliffordAlgebra.invertibleιOfInvertible
theorem invOf_ι (m : M) [Invertible (Q m)] [Invertible (ι Q m)] :
⅟ (ι Q m) = ι Q (⅟ (Q m) • m) := by
letI := invertibleιOfInvertible Q m
convert (rfl : ⅟ (ι Q m) = _)
#align clifford_algebra.inv_of_ι CliffordAlgebra.invOf_ι
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/CliffordAlgebra/Inversion.lean | 37 | 40 | theorem isUnit_ι_of_isUnit {m : M} (h : IsUnit (Q m)) : IsUnit (ι Q m) := by |
cases h.nonempty_invertible
letI := invertibleιOfInvertible Q m
exact isUnit_of_invertible (ι Q m)
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Single
#align_import algebra.homology.augment from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory Limits HomologicalComplex
universe v u
variable {V : Type u} [Category.{v} V]
namespace ChainComplex
@[simps]
def truncate [HasZeroMorphisms V] : ChainComplex V ℕ ⥤ ChainComplex V ℕ where
obj C :=
{ X := fun i => C.X (i + 1)
d := fun i j => C.d (i + 1) (j + 1)
shape := fun i j w => C.shape _ _ <| by simpa }
map f := { f := fun i => f.f (i + 1) }
#align chain_complex.truncate ChainComplex.truncate
def truncateTo [HasZeroObject V] [HasZeroMorphisms V] (C : ChainComplex V ℕ) :
truncate.obj C ⟶ (single₀ V).obj (C.X 0) :=
(toSingle₀Equiv (truncate.obj C) (C.X 0)).symm ⟨C.d 1 0, by aesop⟩
#align chain_complex.truncate_to ChainComplex.truncateTo
-- PROJECT when `V` is abelian (but not generally?)
-- `[∀ n, Exact (C.d (n+2) (n+1)) (C.d (n+1) n)] [Epi (C.d 1 0)]` iff `QuasiIso (C.truncate_to)`
variable [HasZeroMorphisms V]
def augment (C : ChainComplex V ℕ) {X : V} (f : C.X 0 ⟶ X) (w : C.d 1 0 ≫ f = 0) :
ChainComplex V ℕ where
X | 0 => X
| i + 1 => C.X i
d | 1, 0 => f
| i + 1, j + 1 => C.d i j
| _, _ => 0
shape
| 1, 0, h => absurd rfl h
| i + 2, 0, _ => rfl
| 0, _, _ => rfl
| i + 1, j + 1, h => by
simp only; exact C.shape i j (Nat.succ_ne_succ.1 h)
d_comp_d'
| _, _, 0, rfl, rfl => w
| _, _, k + 1, rfl, rfl => C.d_comp_d _ _ _
#align chain_complex.augment ChainComplex.augment
@[simp]
theorem augment_X_zero (C : ChainComplex V ℕ) {X : V} (f : C.X 0 ⟶ X) (w : C.d 1 0 ≫ f = 0) :
(augment C f w).X 0 = X :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align chain_complex.augment_X_zero ChainComplex.augment_X_zero
@[simp]
theorem augment_X_succ (C : ChainComplex V ℕ) {X : V} (f : C.X 0 ⟶ X) (w : C.d 1 0 ≫ f = 0)
(i : ℕ) : (augment C f w).X (i + 1) = C.X i :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align chain_complex.augment_X_succ ChainComplex.augment_X_succ
@[simp]
theorem augment_d_one_zero (C : ChainComplex V ℕ) {X : V} (f : C.X 0 ⟶ X) (w : C.d 1 0 ≫ f = 0) :
(augment C f w).d 1 0 = f :=
rfl
#align chain_complex.augment_d_one_zero ChainComplex.augment_d_one_zero
@[simp]
theorem augment_d_succ_succ (C : ChainComplex V ℕ) {X : V} (f : C.X 0 ⟶ X) (w : C.d 1 0 ≫ f = 0)
(i j : ℕ) : (augment C f w).d (i + 1) (j + 1) = C.d i j := by
cases i <;> rfl
#align chain_complex.augment_d_succ_succ ChainComplex.augment_d_succ_succ
def truncateAugment (C : ChainComplex V ℕ) {X : V} (f : C.X 0 ⟶ X) (w : C.d 1 0 ≫ f = 0) :
truncate.obj (augment C f w) ≅ C where
hom := { f := fun i => 𝟙 _ }
inv :=
{ f := fun i => 𝟙 _
comm' := fun i j => by
cases j <;>
· dsimp
simp }
hom_inv_id := by
ext (_ | i) <;>
· dsimp
simp
inv_hom_id := by
ext (_ | i) <;>
· dsimp
simp
#align chain_complex.truncate_augment ChainComplex.truncateAugment
@[simp]
theorem truncateAugment_hom_f (C : ChainComplex V ℕ) {X : V} (f : C.X 0 ⟶ X) (w : C.d 1 0 ≫ f = 0)
(i : ℕ) : (truncateAugment C f w).hom.f i = 𝟙 (C.X i) :=
rfl
#align chain_complex.truncate_augment_hom_f ChainComplex.truncateAugment_hom_f
@[simp]
theorem truncateAugment_inv_f (C : ChainComplex V ℕ) {X : V} (f : C.X 0 ⟶ X) (w : C.d 1 0 ≫ f = 0)
(i : ℕ) : (truncateAugment C f w).inv.f i = 𝟙 ((truncate.obj (augment C f w)).X i) :=
rfl
#align chain_complex.truncate_augment_inv_f ChainComplex.truncateAugment_inv_f
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/Augment.lean | 132 | 134 | theorem chainComplex_d_succ_succ_zero (C : ChainComplex V ℕ) (i : ℕ) : C.d (i + 2) 0 = 0 := by |
rw [C.shape]
exact i.succ_succ_ne_one.symm
|
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Connectivity
#align_import combinatorics.simple_graph.prod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2985fa3c31a27274aed06c433510bc14b73d6488"
variable {α β γ : Type*}
namespace SimpleGraph
-- Porting note: pruned variables to keep things out of local contexts, which
-- can impact how generalization works, or what aesop does.
variable {G : SimpleGraph α} {H : SimpleGraph β}
def boxProd (G : SimpleGraph α) (H : SimpleGraph β) : SimpleGraph (α × β) where
Adj x y := G.Adj x.1 y.1 ∧ x.2 = y.2 ∨ H.Adj x.2 y.2 ∧ x.1 = y.1
symm x y := by simp [and_comm, or_comm, eq_comm, adj_comm]
loopless x := by simp
#align simple_graph.box_prod SimpleGraph.boxProd
infixl:70 " □ " => boxProd
set_option autoImplicit true in
@[simp]
theorem boxProd_adj : (G □ H).Adj x y ↔ G.Adj x.1 y.1 ∧ x.2 = y.2 ∨ H.Adj x.2 y.2 ∧ x.1 = y.1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.box_prod_adj SimpleGraph.boxProd_adj
set_option autoImplicit true in
--@[simp] Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove
theorem boxProd_adj_left : (G □ H).Adj (a₁, b) (a₂, b) ↔ G.Adj a₁ a₂ := by
simp only [boxProd_adj, and_true, SimpleGraph.irrefl, false_and, or_false]
#align simple_graph.box_prod_adj_left SimpleGraph.boxProd_adj_left
set_option autoImplicit true in
--@[simp] Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove
theorem boxProd_adj_right : (G □ H).Adj (a, b₁) (a, b₂) ↔ H.Adj b₁ b₂ := by
simp only [boxProd_adj, SimpleGraph.irrefl, false_and, and_true, false_or]
#align simple_graph.box_prod_adj_right SimpleGraph.boxProd_adj_right
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Prod.lean | 69 | 73 | theorem boxProd_neighborSet (x : α × β) :
(G □ H).neighborSet x = G.neighborSet x.1 ×ˢ {x.2} ∪ {x.1} ×ˢ H.neighborSet x.2 := by |
ext ⟨a', b'⟩
simp only [mem_neighborSet, Set.mem_union, boxProd_adj, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_singleton_iff]
simp only [eq_comm, and_comm]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.GroupWithZero.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.FiniteSupport
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
#align_import algebra.big_operators.finprod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d6fad0e5bf2d6f48da9175d25c3dc5706b3834ce"
open Function Set
-- Porting note: Used to be section Sort
section sort
variable {G M N : Type*} {α β ι : Sort*} [CommMonoid M] [CommMonoid N]
section
open scoped Classical
noncomputable irreducible_def finsum (lemma := finsum_def') [AddCommMonoid M] (f : α → M) : M :=
if h : (support (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite then ∑ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i.down else 0
#align finsum finsum
@[to_additive existing]
noncomputable irreducible_def finprod (lemma := finprod_def') (f : α → M) : M :=
if h : (mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite then ∏ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i.down else 1
#align finprod finprod
attribute [to_additive existing] finprod_def'
end
open Batteries.ExtendedBinder
notation3"∑ᶠ "(...)", "r:67:(scoped f => finsum f) => r
notation3"∏ᶠ "(...)", "r:67:(scoped f => finprod f) => r
-- Porting note: The following ports the lean3 notation for this file, but is currently very fickle.
-- syntax (name := bigfinsum) "∑ᶠ" extBinders ", " term:67 : term
-- macro_rules (kind := bigfinsum)
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident, $p) => `(finsum (fun $x:ident ↦ $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident : $t, $p) => `(finsum (fun $x:ident : $t ↦ $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident $b:binderPred, $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum (α := satisfies_binder_pred% $x $b) (fun _ => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun ($x) => finsum (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident : $_) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun ($x) => finsum (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum (α := $t) fun $h => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum fun $z => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum fun $z => (finsum (α := $t) fun $h => $p))))
--
--
-- syntax (name := bigfinprod) "∏ᶠ " extBinders ", " term:67 : term
-- macro_rules (kind := bigfinprod)
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident, $p) => `(finprod (fun $x:ident ↦ $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident : $t, $p) => `(finprod (fun $x:ident : $t ↦ $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident $b:binderPred, $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod (α := satisfies_binder_pred% $x $b) (fun _ => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun ($x) => finprod (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident : $_) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun ($x) => finprod (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod (α := $t) fun $h => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod fun $z => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod fun $z =>
-- (finprod (α := $t) fun $h => $p))))
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset {f : α → M}
(hf : (mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite) {s : Finset (PLift α)} (hs : hf.toFinset ⊆ s) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i.down := by
rw [finprod, dif_pos]
refine Finset.prod_subset hs fun x _ hxf => ?_
rwa [hf.mem_toFinset, nmem_mulSupport] at hxf
#align finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mul_support_to_finset_subset finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset
#align finsum_eq_sum_plift_of_support_to_finset_subset finsum_eq_sum_plift_of_support_toFinset_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset {f : α → M} {s : Finset (PLift α)}
(hs : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ s) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i.down :=
finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset (s.finite_toSet.subset hs) fun x hx => by
rw [Finite.mem_toFinset] at hx
exact hs hx
#align finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mul_support_subset finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset
#align finsum_eq_sum_plift_of_support_subset finsum_eq_sum_plift_of_support_subset
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_one : (∏ᶠ _ : α, (1 : M)) = 1 := by
have : (mulSupport fun x : PLift α => (fun _ => 1 : α → M) x.down) ⊆ (∅ : Finset (PLift α)) :=
fun x h => by simp at h
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this, Finset.prod_empty]
#align finprod_one finprod_one
#align finsum_zero finsum_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 := by
rw [← finprod_one]
congr
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
#align finprod_of_is_empty finprod_of_isEmpty
#align finsum_of_is_empty finsum_of_isEmpty
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_false (f : False → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 :=
finprod_of_isEmpty _
#align finprod_false finprod_false
#align finsum_false finsum_false
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_single (f : α → M) (a : α) (ha : ∀ x, x ≠ a → f x = 1) :
∏ᶠ x, f x = f a := by
have : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ ({PLift.up a} : Finset (PLift α)) := by
intro x
contrapose
simpa [PLift.eq_up_iff_down_eq] using ha x.down
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this, Finset.prod_singleton]
#align finprod_eq_single finprod_eq_single
#align finsum_eq_single finsum_eq_single
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_unique [Unique α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = f default :=
finprod_eq_single f default fun _x hx => (hx <| Unique.eq_default _).elim
#align finprod_unique finprod_unique
#align finsum_unique finsum_unique
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_true (f : True → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = f trivial :=
@finprod_unique M True _ ⟨⟨trivial⟩, fun _ => rfl⟩ f
#align finprod_true finprod_true
#align finsum_true finsum_true
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (f : p → M) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = if h : p then f h else 1 := by
split_ifs with h
· haveI : Unique p := ⟨⟨h⟩, fun _ => rfl⟩
exact finprod_unique f
· haveI : IsEmpty p := ⟨h⟩
exact finprod_of_isEmpty f
#align finprod_eq_dif finprod_eq_dif
#align finsum_eq_dif finsum_eq_dif
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] {x : M} : ∏ᶠ _ : p, x = if p then x else 1 :=
finprod_eq_dif fun _ => x
#align finprod_eq_if finprod_eq_if
#align finsum_eq_if finsum_eq_if
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_congr {f g : α → M} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : finprod f = finprod g :=
congr_arg _ <| funext h
#align finprod_congr finprod_congr
#align finsum_congr finsum_congr
@[to_additive (attr := congr)]
theorem finprod_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f : p → M} {g : q → M} (hpq : p = q)
(hfg : ∀ h : q, f (hpq.mpr h) = g h) : finprod f = finprod g := by
subst q
exact finprod_congr hfg
#align finprod_congr_Prop finprod_congr_Prop
#align finsum_congr_Prop finsum_congr_Prop
@[to_additive
"To prove a property of a finite sum, it suffices to prove that the property is
additive and holds on the summands."]
theorem finprod_induction {f : α → M} (p : M → Prop) (hp₀ : p 1)
(hp₁ : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y)) (hp₂ : ∀ i, p (f i)) : p (∏ᶠ i, f i) := by
rw [finprod]
split_ifs
exacts [Finset.prod_induction _ _ hp₁ hp₀ fun i _ => hp₂ _, hp₀]
#align finprod_induction finprod_induction
#align finsum_induction finsum_induction
theorem finprod_nonneg {R : Type*} [OrderedCommSemiring R] {f : α → R} (hf : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x) :
0 ≤ ∏ᶠ x, f x :=
finprod_induction (fun x => 0 ≤ x) zero_le_one (fun _ _ => mul_nonneg) hf
#align finprod_nonneg finprod_nonneg
@[to_additive finsum_nonneg]
theorem one_le_finprod' {M : Type*} [OrderedCommMonoid M] {f : α → M} (hf : ∀ i, 1 ≤ f i) :
1 ≤ ∏ᶠ i, f i :=
finprod_induction _ le_rfl (fun _ _ => one_le_mul) hf
#align one_le_finprod' one_le_finprod'
#align finsum_nonneg finsum_nonneg
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_plift (f : M →* N) (g : α → M)
(h : (mulSupport <| g ∘ PLift.down).Finite) : f (∏ᶠ x, g x) = ∏ᶠ x, f (g x) := by
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset h.coe_toFinset.ge,
finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset, map_prod]
rw [h.coe_toFinset]
exact mulSupport_comp_subset f.map_one (g ∘ PLift.down)
#align monoid_hom.map_finprod_plift MonoidHom.map_finprod_plift
#align add_monoid_hom.map_finsum_plift AddMonoidHom.map_finsum_plift
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_Prop {p : Prop} (f : M →* N) (g : p → M) :
f (∏ᶠ x, g x) = ∏ᶠ x, f (g x) :=
f.map_finprod_plift g (Set.toFinite _)
#align monoid_hom.map_finprod_Prop MonoidHom.map_finprod_Prop
#align add_monoid_hom.map_finsum_Prop AddMonoidHom.map_finsum_Prop
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Finprod.lean | 308 | 312 | theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_of_preimage_one (f : M →* N) (hf : ∀ x, f x = 1 → x = 1) (g : α → M) :
f (∏ᶠ i, g i) = ∏ᶠ i, f (g i) := by |
by_cases hg : (mulSupport <| g ∘ PLift.down).Finite; · exact f.map_finprod_plift g hg
rw [finprod, dif_neg, f.map_one, finprod, dif_neg]
exacts [Infinite.mono (fun x hx => mt (hf (g x.down)) hx) hg, hg]
|
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Arithmetic
#align_import set_theory.ordinal.exponential from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b67044ba53af18680e1dd246861d9584e968495d"
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Classical
open Cardinal Ordinal
universe u v w
namespace Ordinal
instance pow : Pow Ordinal Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => if a = 0 then 1 - b else limitRecOn b 1 (fun _ IH => IH * a) fun b _ => bsup.{u, u} b⟩
-- Porting note: Ambiguous notations.
-- local infixr:0 "^" => @Pow.pow Ordinal Ordinal Ordinal.instPowOrdinalOrdinal
theorem opow_def (a b : Ordinal) :
a ^ b = if a = 0 then 1 - b else limitRecOn b 1 (fun _ IH => IH * a) fun b _ => bsup.{u, u} b :=
rfl
#align ordinal.opow_def Ordinal.opow_def
-- Porting note: `if_pos rfl` → `if_true`
theorem zero_opow' (a : Ordinal) : 0 ^ a = 1 - a := by simp only [opow_def, if_true]
#align ordinal.zero_opow' Ordinal.zero_opow'
@[simp]
theorem zero_opow {a : Ordinal} (a0 : a ≠ 0) : (0 : Ordinal) ^ a = 0 := by
rwa [zero_opow', Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le, one_le_iff_ne_zero]
#align ordinal.zero_opow Ordinal.zero_opow
@[simp]
theorem opow_zero (a : Ordinal) : a ^ (0 : Ordinal) = 1 := by
by_cases h : a = 0
· simp only [opow_def, if_pos h, sub_zero]
· simp only [opow_def, if_neg h, limitRecOn_zero]
#align ordinal.opow_zero Ordinal.opow_zero
@[simp]
theorem opow_succ (a b : Ordinal) : a ^ succ b = a ^ b * a :=
if h : a = 0 then by subst a; simp only [zero_opow (succ_ne_zero _), mul_zero]
else by simp only [opow_def, limitRecOn_succ, if_neg h]
#align ordinal.opow_succ Ordinal.opow_succ
theorem opow_limit {a b : Ordinal} (a0 : a ≠ 0) (h : IsLimit b) :
a ^ b = bsup.{u, u} b fun c _ => a ^ c := by
simp only [opow_def, if_neg a0]; rw [limitRecOn_limit _ _ _ _ h]
#align ordinal.opow_limit Ordinal.opow_limit
theorem opow_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : a ≠ 0) (h : IsLimit b) :
a ^ b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a ^ b' ≤ c := by rw [opow_limit a0 h, bsup_le_iff]
#align ordinal.opow_le_of_limit Ordinal.opow_le_of_limit
theorem lt_opow_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (h : IsLimit c) :
a < b ^ c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b ^ c' := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_exists]; simp only [not_lt, opow_le_of_limit b0 h, exists_prop, not_and]
#align ordinal.lt_opow_of_limit Ordinal.lt_opow_of_limit
@[simp]
theorem opow_one (a : Ordinal) : a ^ (1 : Ordinal) = a := by
rw [← succ_zero, opow_succ]; simp only [opow_zero, one_mul]
#align ordinal.opow_one Ordinal.opow_one
@[simp]
theorem one_opow (a : Ordinal) : (1 : Ordinal) ^ a = 1 := by
induction a using limitRecOn with
| H₁ => simp only [opow_zero]
| H₂ _ ih =>
simp only [opow_succ, ih, mul_one]
| H₃ b l IH =>
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => ?_
rw [opow_le_of_limit Ordinal.one_ne_zero l]
exact ⟨fun H => by simpa only [opow_zero] using H 0 l.pos, fun H b' h => by rwa [IH _ h]⟩
#align ordinal.one_opow Ordinal.one_opow
theorem opow_pos {a : Ordinal} (b : Ordinal) (a0 : 0 < a) : 0 < a ^ b := by
have h0 : 0 < a ^ (0 : Ordinal) := by simp only [opow_zero, zero_lt_one]
induction b using limitRecOn with
| H₁ => exact h0
| H₂ b IH =>
rw [opow_succ]
exact mul_pos IH a0
| H₃ b l _ =>
exact (lt_opow_of_limit (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 a0) l).2 ⟨0, l.pos, h0⟩
#align ordinal.opow_pos Ordinal.opow_pos
theorem opow_ne_zero {a : Ordinal} (b : Ordinal) (a0 : a ≠ 0) : a ^ b ≠ 0 :=
Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 <| opow_pos b <| Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 a0
#align ordinal.opow_ne_zero Ordinal.opow_ne_zero
theorem opow_isNormal {a : Ordinal} (h : 1 < a) : IsNormal (a ^ ·) :=
have a0 : 0 < a := zero_lt_one.trans h
⟨fun b => by simpa only [mul_one, opow_succ] using (mul_lt_mul_iff_left (opow_pos b a0)).2 h,
fun b l c => opow_le_of_limit (ne_of_gt a0) l⟩
#align ordinal.opow_is_normal Ordinal.opow_isNormal
theorem opow_lt_opow_iff_right {a b c : Ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b < a ^ c ↔ b < c :=
(opow_isNormal a1).lt_iff
#align ordinal.opow_lt_opow_iff_right Ordinal.opow_lt_opow_iff_right
theorem opow_le_opow_iff_right {a b c : Ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b ≤ a ^ c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(opow_isNormal a1).le_iff
#align ordinal.opow_le_opow_iff_right Ordinal.opow_le_opow_iff_right
theorem opow_right_inj {a b c : Ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b = a ^ c ↔ b = c :=
(opow_isNormal a1).inj
#align ordinal.opow_right_inj Ordinal.opow_right_inj
theorem opow_isLimit {a b : Ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a ^ b) :=
(opow_isNormal a1).isLimit
#align ordinal.opow_is_limit Ordinal.opow_isLimit
theorem opow_isLimit_left {a b : Ordinal} (l : IsLimit a) (hb : b ≠ 0) : IsLimit (a ^ b) := by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with (e | ⟨b, rfl⟩ | l')
· exact absurd e hb
· rw [opow_succ]
exact mul_isLimit (opow_pos _ l.pos) l
· exact opow_isLimit l.one_lt l'
#align ordinal.opow_is_limit_left Ordinal.opow_isLimit_left
theorem opow_le_opow_right {a b c : Ordinal} (h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : b ≤ c) : a ^ b ≤ a ^ c := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le (one_le_iff_pos.2 h₁) with h₁ | h₁
· exact (opow_le_opow_iff_right h₁).2 h₂
· subst a
-- Porting note: `le_refl` is required.
simp only [one_opow, le_refl]
#align ordinal.opow_le_opow_right Ordinal.opow_le_opow_right
theorem opow_le_opow_left {a b : Ordinal} (c : Ordinal) (ab : a ≤ b) : a ^ c ≤ b ^ c := by
by_cases a0 : a = 0
-- Porting note: `le_refl` is required.
· subst a
by_cases c0 : c = 0
· subst c
simp only [opow_zero, le_refl]
· simp only [zero_opow c0, Ordinal.zero_le]
· induction c using limitRecOn with
| H₁ => simp only [opow_zero, le_refl]
| H₂ c IH =>
simpa only [opow_succ] using mul_le_mul' IH ab
| H₃ c l IH =>
exact
(opow_le_of_limit a0 l).2 fun b' h =>
(IH _ h).trans (opow_le_opow_right ((Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 a0).trans_le ab) h.le)
#align ordinal.opow_le_opow_left Ordinal.opow_le_opow_left
theorem left_le_opow (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (b1 : 0 < b) : a ≤ a ^ b := by
nth_rw 1 [← opow_one a]
cases' le_or_gt a 1 with a1 a1
· rcases lt_or_eq_of_le a1 with a0 | a1
· rw [lt_one_iff_zero] at a0
rw [a0, zero_opow Ordinal.one_ne_zero]
exact Ordinal.zero_le _
rw [a1, one_opow, one_opow]
rwa [opow_le_opow_iff_right a1, one_le_iff_pos]
#align ordinal.left_le_opow Ordinal.left_le_opow
theorem right_le_opow {a : Ordinal} (b : Ordinal) (a1 : 1 < a) : b ≤ a ^ b :=
(opow_isNormal a1).self_le _
#align ordinal.right_le_opow Ordinal.right_le_opow
theorem opow_lt_opow_left_of_succ {a b c : Ordinal} (ab : a < b) : a ^ succ c < b ^ succ c := by
rw [opow_succ, opow_succ]
exact
(mul_le_mul_right' (opow_le_opow_left c ab.le) a).trans_lt
(mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left ab (opow_pos c ((Ordinal.zero_le a).trans_lt ab)))
#align ordinal.opow_lt_opow_left_of_succ Ordinal.opow_lt_opow_left_of_succ
theorem opow_add (a b c : Ordinal) : a ^ (b + c) = a ^ b * a ^ c := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | a0)
· rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with (rfl | c0)
· simp
have : b + c ≠ 0 := ((Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 c0).trans_le (le_add_left _ _)).ne'
simp only [zero_opow c0, zero_opow this, mul_zero]
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 a0) with (rfl | a1)
· simp only [one_opow, mul_one]
induction c using limitRecOn with
| H₁ => simp
| H₂ c IH =>
rw [add_succ, opow_succ, IH, opow_succ, mul_assoc]
| H₃ c l IH =>
refine
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d =>
(((opow_isNormal a1).trans (add_isNormal b)).limit_le l).trans ?_
dsimp only [Function.comp_def]
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [IH]
exact
(((mul_isNormal <| opow_pos b (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 a0)).trans
(opow_isNormal a1)).limit_le
l).symm
#align ordinal.opow_add Ordinal.opow_add
theorem opow_one_add (a b : Ordinal) : a ^ (1 + b) = a * a ^ b := by rw [opow_add, opow_one]
#align ordinal.opow_one_add Ordinal.opow_one_add
theorem opow_dvd_opow (a : Ordinal) {b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ c) : a ^ b ∣ a ^ c :=
⟨a ^ (c - b), by rw [← opow_add, Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h]⟩
#align ordinal.opow_dvd_opow Ordinal.opow_dvd_opow
theorem opow_dvd_opow_iff {a b c : Ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b ∣ a ^ c ↔ b ≤ c :=
⟨fun h =>
le_of_not_lt fun hn =>
not_le_of_lt ((opow_lt_opow_iff_right a1).2 hn) <|
le_of_dvd (opow_ne_zero _ <| one_le_iff_ne_zero.1 <| a1.le) h,
opow_dvd_opow _⟩
#align ordinal.opow_dvd_opow_iff Ordinal.opow_dvd_opow_iff
theorem opow_mul (a b c : Ordinal) : a ^ (b * c) = (a ^ b) ^ c := by
by_cases b0 : b = 0; · simp only [b0, zero_mul, opow_zero, one_opow]
by_cases a0 : a = 0
· subst a
by_cases c0 : c = 0
· simp only [c0, mul_zero, opow_zero]
simp only [zero_opow b0, zero_opow c0, zero_opow (mul_ne_zero b0 c0)]
cases' eq_or_lt_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 a0) with a1 a1
· subst a1
simp only [one_opow]
induction c using limitRecOn with
| H₁ => simp only [mul_zero, opow_zero]
| H₂ c IH =>
rw [mul_succ, opow_add, IH, opow_succ]
| H₃ c l IH =>
refine
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d =>
(((opow_isNormal a1).trans (mul_isNormal (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 b0))).limit_le
l).trans
?_
dsimp only [Function.comp_def]
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [IH]
exact (opow_le_of_limit (opow_ne_zero _ a0) l).symm
#align ordinal.opow_mul Ordinal.opow_mul
-- @[pp_nodot] -- Porting note: Unknown attribute.
def log (b : Ordinal) (x : Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
if _h : 1 < b then pred (sInf { o | x < b ^ o }) else 0
#align ordinal.log Ordinal.log
theorem log_nonempty {b x : Ordinal} (h : 1 < b) : { o : Ordinal | x < b ^ o }.Nonempty :=
⟨_, succ_le_iff.1 (right_le_opow _ h)⟩
#align ordinal.log_nonempty Ordinal.log_nonempty
theorem log_def {b : Ordinal} (h : 1 < b) (x : Ordinal) :
log b x = pred (sInf { o | x < b ^ o }) := by simp only [log, dif_pos h]
#align ordinal.log_def Ordinal.log_def
theorem log_of_not_one_lt_left {b : Ordinal} (h : ¬1 < b) (x : Ordinal) : log b x = 0 := by
simp only [log, dif_neg h]
#align ordinal.log_of_not_one_lt_left Ordinal.log_of_not_one_lt_left
theorem log_of_left_le_one {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ 1) : ∀ x, log b x = 0 :=
log_of_not_one_lt_left h.not_lt
#align ordinal.log_of_left_le_one Ordinal.log_of_left_le_one
@[simp]
theorem log_zero_left : ∀ b, log 0 b = 0 :=
log_of_left_le_one zero_le_one
#align ordinal.log_zero_left Ordinal.log_zero_left
@[simp]
theorem log_zero_right (b : Ordinal) : log b 0 = 0 :=
if b1 : 1 < b then by
rw [log_def b1, ← Ordinal.le_zero, pred_le]
apply csInf_le'
dsimp
rw [succ_zero, opow_one]
exact zero_lt_one.trans b1
else by simp only [log_of_not_one_lt_left b1]
#align ordinal.log_zero_right Ordinal.log_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem log_one_left : ∀ b, log 1 b = 0 :=
log_of_left_le_one le_rfl
#align ordinal.log_one_left Ordinal.log_one_left
theorem succ_log_def {b x : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (hx : x ≠ 0) :
succ (log b x) = sInf { o : Ordinal | x < b ^ o } := by
let t := sInf { o : Ordinal | x < b ^ o }
have : x < (b^t) := csInf_mem (log_nonempty hb)
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit t with (h | h | h)
· refine ((one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hx).not_lt ?_).elim
simpa only [h, opow_zero] using this
· rw [show log b x = pred t from log_def hb x, succ_pred_iff_is_succ.2 h]
· rcases (lt_opow_of_limit (zero_lt_one.trans hb).ne' h).1 this with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact h₁.not_le.elim ((le_csInf_iff'' (log_nonempty hb)).1 le_rfl a h₂)
#align ordinal.succ_log_def Ordinal.succ_log_def
theorem lt_opow_succ_log_self {b : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (x : Ordinal) :
x < b ^ succ (log b x) := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· apply opow_pos _ (zero_lt_one.trans hb)
· rw [succ_log_def hb hx]
exact csInf_mem (log_nonempty hb)
#align ordinal.lt_opow_succ_log_self Ordinal.lt_opow_succ_log_self
theorem opow_log_le_self (b : Ordinal) {x : Ordinal} (hx : x ≠ 0) : b ^ log b x ≤ x := by
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | b0)
· rw [zero_opow']
exact (sub_le_self _ _).trans (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hx)
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 b0) with (hb | rfl)
· refine le_of_not_lt fun h => (lt_succ (log b x)).not_le ?_
have := @csInf_le' _ _ { o | x < b ^ o } _ h
rwa [← succ_log_def hb hx] at this
· rwa [one_opow, one_le_iff_ne_zero]
#align ordinal.opow_log_le_self Ordinal.opow_log_le_self
theorem opow_le_iff_le_log {b x c : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (hx : x ≠ 0) : b ^ c ≤ x ↔ c ≤ log b x :=
⟨fun h =>
le_of_not_lt fun hn =>
(lt_opow_succ_log_self hb x).not_le <|
((opow_le_opow_iff_right hb).2 (succ_le_of_lt hn)).trans h,
fun h => ((opow_le_opow_iff_right hb).2 h).trans (opow_log_le_self b hx)⟩
#align ordinal.opow_le_iff_le_log Ordinal.opow_le_iff_le_log
theorem lt_opow_iff_log_lt {b x c : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (hx : x ≠ 0) : x < b ^ c ↔ log b x < c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (opow_le_iff_le_log hb hx)
#align ordinal.lt_opow_iff_log_lt Ordinal.lt_opow_iff_log_lt
theorem log_pos {b o : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (ho : o ≠ 0) (hbo : b ≤ o) : 0 < log b o := by
rwa [← succ_le_iff, succ_zero, ← opow_le_iff_le_log hb ho, opow_one]
#align ordinal.log_pos Ordinal.log_pos
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Exponential.lean | 347 | 354 | theorem log_eq_zero {b o : Ordinal} (hbo : o < b) : log b o = 0 := by |
rcases eq_or_ne o 0 with (rfl | ho)
· exact log_zero_right b
rcases le_or_lt b 1 with hb | hb
· rcases le_one_iff.1 hb with (rfl | rfl)
· exact log_zero_left o
· exact log_one_left o
· rwa [← Ordinal.le_zero, ← lt_succ_iff, succ_zero, ← lt_opow_iff_log_lt hb ho, opow_one]
|
import Mathlib.RingTheory.AdicCompletion.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Torsion
open Submodule
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (I : Ideal R)
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
namespace AdicCompletion
attribute [-simp] smul_eq_mul Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul
@[local simp]
theorem transitionMap_ideal_mk {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) (x : R) :
transitionMap I R hmn (Ideal.Quotient.mk (I ^ n • ⊤ : Ideal R) x) =
Ideal.Quotient.mk (I ^ m • ⊤ : Ideal R) x :=
rfl
@[local simp]
theorem transitionMap_map_one {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) : transitionMap I R hmn 1 = 1 :=
rfl
@[local simp]
theorem transitionMap_map_mul {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) (x y : R ⧸ (I ^ n • ⊤ : Ideal R)) :
transitionMap I R hmn (x * y) = transitionMap I R hmn x * transitionMap I R hmn y :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂' x y (fun _ _ ↦ rfl)
def transitionMapₐ {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) :
R ⧸ (I ^ n • ⊤ : Ideal R) →ₐ[R] R ⧸ (I ^ m • ⊤ : Ideal R) :=
AlgHom.ofLinearMap (transitionMap I R hmn) rfl (transitionMap_map_mul I hmn)
def subalgebra : Subalgebra R (∀ n, R ⧸ (I ^ n • ⊤ : Ideal R)) :=
Submodule.toSubalgebra (submodule I R) (fun _ ↦ by simp)
(fun x y hx hy m n hmn ↦ by simp [hx hmn, hy hmn])
def subring : Subring (∀ n, R ⧸ (I ^ n • ⊤ : Ideal R)) :=
Subalgebra.toSubring (subalgebra I)
instance : CommRing (AdicCompletion I R) :=
inferInstanceAs <| CommRing (subring I)
instance : Algebra R (AdicCompletion I R) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Algebra R (subalgebra I)
@[simp]
theorem val_one (n : ℕ) : (1 : AdicCompletion I R).val n = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_mul (n : ℕ) (x y : AdicCompletion I R) : (x * y).val n = x.val n * y.val n :=
rfl
def evalₐ (n : ℕ) : AdicCompletion I R →ₐ[R] R ⧸ I ^ n :=
have h : (I ^ n • ⊤ : Ideal R) = I ^ n := by ext x; simp
AlgHom.comp
(Ideal.quotientEquivAlgOfEq R h)
(AlgHom.ofLinearMap (eval I R n) rfl (fun _ _ ↦ rfl))
@[simp]
theorem evalₐ_mk (n : ℕ) (x : AdicCauchySequence I R) :
evalₐ I n (mk I R x) = Ideal.Quotient.mk (I ^ n) (x.val n) := by
simp [evalₐ]
def AdicCauchySequence.subalgebra : Subalgebra R (ℕ → R) :=
Submodule.toSubalgebra (AdicCauchySequence.submodule I R)
(fun {m n} _ ↦ by simp; rfl)
(fun x y hx hy {m n} hmn ↦ by
simp only [Pi.mul_apply]
exact SModEq.mul (hx hmn) (hy hmn))
def AdicCauchySequence.subring : Subring (ℕ → R) :=
Subalgebra.toSubring (AdicCauchySequence.subalgebra I)
instance : CommRing (AdicCauchySequence I R) :=
inferInstanceAs <| CommRing (AdicCauchySequence.subring I)
instance : Algebra R (AdicCauchySequence I R) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Algebra R (AdicCauchySequence.subalgebra I)
@[simp]
theorem one_apply (n : ℕ) : (1 : AdicCauchySequence I R) n = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_apply (n : ℕ) (f g : AdicCauchySequence I R) : (f * g) n = f n * g n :=
rfl
@[simps!]
def mkₐ : AdicCauchySequence I R →ₐ[R] AdicCompletion I R :=
AlgHom.ofLinearMap (mk I R) rfl (fun _ _ ↦ rfl)
@[simp]
theorem evalₐ_mkₐ (n : ℕ) (x : AdicCauchySequence I R) :
evalₐ I n (mkₐ I x) = Ideal.Quotient.mk (I ^ n) (x.val n) := by
simp [mkₐ]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/AdicCompletion/Algebra.lean | 127 | 131 | theorem Ideal.mk_eq_mk {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) (r : AdicCauchySequence I R) :
Ideal.Quotient.mk (I ^ m) (r.val n) = Ideal.Quotient.mk (I ^ m) (r.val m) := by |
have h : I ^ m = I ^ m • ⊤ := by simp
rw [h, ← Ideal.Quotient.mk_eq_mk, ← Ideal.Quotient.mk_eq_mk]
exact (r.property hmn).symm
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Restrict
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Topology
open Set MeasureTheory Measure Filter Function MeasurableSpace ENNReal
variable {α β δ ι : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} [MeasurableSpace β] {μ ν ν₁ ν₂: Measure α}
{s t : Set α}
section IsFiniteMeasure
class IsFiniteMeasure (μ : Measure α) : Prop where
measure_univ_lt_top : μ univ < ∞
#align measure_theory.is_finite_measure MeasureTheory.IsFiniteMeasure
#align measure_theory.is_finite_measure.measure_univ_lt_top MeasureTheory.IsFiniteMeasure.measure_univ_lt_top
theorem not_isFiniteMeasure_iff : ¬IsFiniteMeasure μ ↔ μ Set.univ = ∞ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => fun h' => h'.measure_univ_lt_top.ne h⟩
by_contra h'
exact h ⟨lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr h'⟩
#align measure_theory.not_is_finite_measure_iff MeasureTheory.not_isFiniteMeasure_iff
instance Restrict.isFiniteMeasure (μ : Measure α) [hs : Fact (μ s < ∞)] :
IsFiniteMeasure (μ.restrict s) :=
⟨by simpa using hs.elim⟩
#align measure_theory.restrict.is_finite_measure MeasureTheory.Restrict.isFiniteMeasure
theorem measure_lt_top (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (s : Set α) : μ s < ∞ :=
(measure_mono (subset_univ s)).trans_lt IsFiniteMeasure.measure_univ_lt_top
#align measure_theory.measure_lt_top MeasureTheory.measure_lt_top
instance isFiniteMeasureRestrict (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) [h : IsFiniteMeasure μ] :
IsFiniteMeasure (μ.restrict s) :=
⟨by simpa using measure_lt_top μ s⟩
#align measure_theory.is_finite_measure_restrict MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasureRestrict
theorem measure_ne_top (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (s : Set α) : μ s ≠ ∞ :=
ne_of_lt (measure_lt_top μ s)
#align measure_theory.measure_ne_top MeasureTheory.measure_ne_top
theorem measure_compl_le_add_of_le_add [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : MeasurableSet t) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (h : μ s ≤ μ t + ε) : μ tᶜ ≤ μ sᶜ + ε := by
rw [measure_compl ht (measure_ne_top μ _), measure_compl hs (measure_ne_top μ _),
tsub_le_iff_right]
calc
μ univ = μ univ - μ s + μ s := (tsub_add_cancel_of_le <| measure_mono s.subset_univ).symm
_ ≤ μ univ - μ s + (μ t + ε) := add_le_add_left h _
_ = _ := by rw [add_right_comm, add_assoc]
#align measure_theory.measure_compl_le_add_of_le_add MeasureTheory.measure_compl_le_add_of_le_add
theorem measure_compl_le_add_iff [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} : μ sᶜ ≤ μ tᶜ + ε ↔ μ t ≤ μ s + ε :=
⟨fun h => compl_compl s ▸ compl_compl t ▸ measure_compl_le_add_of_le_add hs.compl ht.compl h,
measure_compl_le_add_of_le_add ht hs⟩
#align measure_theory.measure_compl_le_add_iff MeasureTheory.measure_compl_le_add_iff
def measureUnivNNReal (μ : Measure α) : ℝ≥0 :=
(μ univ).toNNReal
#align measure_theory.measure_univ_nnreal MeasureTheory.measureUnivNNReal
@[simp]
theorem coe_measureUnivNNReal (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] :
↑(measureUnivNNReal μ) = μ univ :=
ENNReal.coe_toNNReal (measure_ne_top μ univ)
#align measure_theory.coe_measure_univ_nnreal MeasureTheory.coe_measureUnivNNReal
instance isFiniteMeasureZero : IsFiniteMeasure (0 : Measure α) :=
⟨by simp⟩
#align measure_theory.is_finite_measure_zero MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasureZero
instance (priority := 50) isFiniteMeasureOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : IsFiniteMeasure μ := by
rw [eq_zero_of_isEmpty μ]
infer_instance
#align measure_theory.is_finite_measure_of_is_empty MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasureOfIsEmpty
@[simp]
theorem measureUnivNNReal_zero : measureUnivNNReal (0 : Measure α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure_univ_nnreal_zero MeasureTheory.measureUnivNNReal_zero
instance isFiniteMeasureAdd [IsFiniteMeasure μ] [IsFiniteMeasure ν] : IsFiniteMeasure (μ + ν) where
measure_univ_lt_top := by
rw [Measure.coe_add, Pi.add_apply, ENNReal.add_lt_top]
exact ⟨measure_lt_top _ _, measure_lt_top _ _⟩
#align measure_theory.is_finite_measure_add MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasureAdd
instance isFiniteMeasureSMulNNReal [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {r : ℝ≥0} : IsFiniteMeasure (r • μ) where
measure_univ_lt_top := ENNReal.mul_lt_top ENNReal.coe_ne_top (measure_ne_top _ _)
#align measure_theory.is_finite_measure_smul_nnreal MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasureSMulNNReal
instance IsFiniteMeasure.average : IsFiniteMeasure ((μ univ)⁻¹ • μ) where
measure_univ_lt_top := by
rw [smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, ← ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul]
exact ENNReal.div_self_le_one.trans_lt ENNReal.one_lt_top
instance isFiniteMeasureSMulOfNNRealTower {R} [SMul R ℝ≥0] [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0∞]
[IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {r : R} : IsFiniteMeasure (r • μ) := by
rw [← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r μ]
infer_instance
#align measure_theory.is_finite_measure_smul_of_nnreal_tower MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasureSMulOfNNRealTower
theorem isFiniteMeasure_of_le (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (h : ν ≤ μ) : IsFiniteMeasure ν :=
{ measure_univ_lt_top := (h Set.univ).trans_lt (measure_lt_top _ _) }
#align measure_theory.is_finite_measure_of_le MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasure_of_le
@[instance]
theorem Measure.isFiniteMeasure_map {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
(f : α → β) : IsFiniteMeasure (μ.map f) := by
by_cases hf : AEMeasurable f μ
· constructor
rw [map_apply_of_aemeasurable hf MeasurableSet.univ]
exact measure_lt_top μ _
· rw [map_of_not_aemeasurable hf]
exact MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasureZero
#align measure_theory.measure.is_finite_measure_map MeasureTheory.Measure.isFiniteMeasure_map
@[simp]
theorem measureUnivNNReal_eq_zero [IsFiniteMeasure μ] : measureUnivNNReal μ = 0 ↔ μ = 0 := by
rw [← MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_univ_eq_zero, ← coe_measureUnivNNReal]
norm_cast
#align measure_theory.measure_univ_nnreal_eq_zero MeasureTheory.measureUnivNNReal_eq_zero
theorem measureUnivNNReal_pos [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hμ : μ ≠ 0) : 0 < measureUnivNNReal μ := by
contrapose! hμ
simpa [measureUnivNNReal_eq_zero, Nat.le_zero] using hμ
#align measure_theory.measure_univ_nnreal_pos MeasureTheory.measureUnivNNReal_pos
theorem Measure.le_of_add_le_add_left [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (A2 : μ + ν₁ ≤ μ + ν₂) : ν₁ ≤ ν₂ :=
fun S => ENNReal.le_of_add_le_add_left (MeasureTheory.measure_ne_top μ S) (A2 S)
#align measure_theory.measure.le_of_add_le_add_left MeasureTheory.Measure.le_of_add_le_add_left
theorem summable_measure_toReal [hμ : IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : ℕ → Set α}
(hf₁ : ∀ i : ℕ, MeasurableSet (f i)) (hf₂ : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) :
Summable fun x => (μ (f x)).toReal := by
apply ENNReal.summable_toReal
rw [← MeasureTheory.measure_iUnion hf₂ hf₁]
exact ne_of_lt (measure_lt_top _ _)
#align measure_theory.summable_measure_to_real MeasureTheory.summable_measure_toReal
theorem ae_eq_univ_iff_measure_eq [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) :
s =ᵐ[μ] univ ↔ μ s = μ univ := by
refine ⟨measure_congr, fun h => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨t, -, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := hs.exists_measurable_subset_ae_eq
exact
ht₂.symm.trans
(ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge (subset_univ t) (Eq.le ((measure_congr ht₂).trans h).symm) ht₁
(measure_ne_top μ univ))
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_univ_iff_measure_eq MeasureTheory.ae_eq_univ_iff_measure_eq
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Typeclasses.lean | 177 | 179 | theorem ae_iff_measure_eq [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {p : α → Prop}
(hp : NullMeasurableSet { a | p a } μ) : (∀ᵐ a ∂μ, p a) ↔ μ { a | p a } = μ univ := by |
rw [← ae_eq_univ_iff_measure_eq hp, eventuallyEq_univ, eventually_iff]
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.InnerProductSpace
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.EqHaar
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.SetIntegral
#align_import measure_theory.measure.haar.normed_space from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b84aee748341da06a6d78491367e2c0e9f15e8a5"
noncomputable section
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Pointwise Topology
open Inv Set Function MeasureTheory.Measure Filter
open FiniteDimensional
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace Measure
example {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [Nontrivial E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ] : NoAtoms μ := by
infer_instance
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E]
[FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ] {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace ℝ F]
variable {s : Set E}
theorem integral_comp_smul (f : E → F) (R : ℝ) :
∫ x, f (R • x) ∂μ = |(R ^ finrank ℝ E)⁻¹| • ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
by_cases hF : CompleteSpace F; swap
· simp [integral, hF]
rcases eq_or_ne R 0 with (rfl | hR)
· simp only [zero_smul, integral_const]
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (finrank ℝ E) with (hE | hE)
· have : Subsingleton E := finrank_zero_iff.1 hE
have : f = fun _ => f 0 := by ext x; rw [Subsingleton.elim x 0]
conv_rhs => rw [this]
simp only [hE, pow_zero, inv_one, abs_one, one_smul, integral_const]
· have : Nontrivial E := finrank_pos_iff.1 hE
simp only [zero_pow hE.ne', measure_univ_of_isAddLeftInvariant, ENNReal.top_toReal, zero_smul,
inv_zero, abs_zero]
· calc
(∫ x, f (R • x) ∂μ) = ∫ y, f y ∂Measure.map (fun x => R • x) μ :=
(integral_map_equiv (Homeomorph.smul (isUnit_iff_ne_zero.2 hR).unit).toMeasurableEquiv
f).symm
_ = |(R ^ finrank ℝ E)⁻¹| • ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
simp only [map_addHaar_smul μ hR, integral_smul_measure, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal, abs_nonneg]
#align measure_theory.measure.integral_comp_smul MeasureTheory.Measure.integral_comp_smul
theorem integral_comp_smul_of_nonneg (f : E → F) (R : ℝ) {hR : 0 ≤ R} :
∫ x, f (R • x) ∂μ = (R ^ finrank ℝ E)⁻¹ • ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
rw [integral_comp_smul μ f R, abs_of_nonneg (inv_nonneg.2 (pow_nonneg hR _))]
#align measure_theory.measure.integral_comp_smul_of_nonneg MeasureTheory.Measure.integral_comp_smul_of_nonneg
theorem integral_comp_inv_smul (f : E → F) (R : ℝ) :
∫ x, f (R⁻¹ • x) ∂μ = |R ^ finrank ℝ E| • ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
rw [integral_comp_smul μ f R⁻¹, inv_pow, inv_inv]
#align measure_theory.measure.integral_comp_inv_smul MeasureTheory.Measure.integral_comp_inv_smul
theorem integral_comp_inv_smul_of_nonneg (f : E → F) {R : ℝ} (hR : 0 ≤ R) :
∫ x, f (R⁻¹ • x) ∂μ = R ^ finrank ℝ E • ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
rw [integral_comp_inv_smul μ f R, abs_of_nonneg (pow_nonneg hR _)]
#align measure_theory.measure.integral_comp_inv_smul_of_nonneg MeasureTheory.Measure.integral_comp_inv_smul_of_nonneg
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Haar/NormedSpace.lean | 110 | 123 | theorem setIntegral_comp_smul (f : E → F) {R : ℝ} (s : Set E) (hR : R ≠ 0) :
∫ x in s, f (R • x) ∂μ = |(R ^ finrank ℝ E)⁻¹| • ∫ x in R • s, f x ∂μ := by |
let e : E ≃ᵐ E := (Homeomorph.smul (Units.mk0 R hR)).toMeasurableEquiv
calc
∫ x in s, f (R • x) ∂μ
= ∫ x in e ⁻¹' (e.symm ⁻¹' s), f (e x) ∂μ := by simp [← preimage_comp]; rfl
_ = ∫ y in e.symm ⁻¹' s, f y ∂map (fun x ↦ R • x) μ := (setIntegral_map_equiv _ _ _).symm
_ = |(R ^ finrank ℝ E)⁻¹| • ∫ y in e.symm ⁻¹' s, f y ∂μ := by
simp [map_addHaar_smul μ hR, integral_smul_measure, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal, abs_nonneg]
_ = |(R ^ finrank ℝ E)⁻¹| • ∫ x in R • s, f x ∂μ := by
congr
ext y
rw [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hR]
rfl
|
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.Algebra.Monoid
#align_import geometry.manifold.algebra.lie_group from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f9ec187127cc5b381dfcf5f4a22dacca4c20b63d"
noncomputable section
open scoped Manifold
-- See note [Design choices about smooth algebraic structures]
class LieAddGroup {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (G : Type*)
[AddGroup G] [TopologicalSpace G] [ChartedSpace H G] extends SmoothAdd I G : Prop where
smooth_neg : Smooth I I fun a : G => -a
#align lie_add_group LieAddGroup
-- See note [Design choices about smooth algebraic structures]
@[to_additive]
class LieGroup {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (G : Type*)
[Group G] [TopologicalSpace G] [ChartedSpace H G] extends SmoothMul I G : Prop where
smooth_inv : Smooth I I fun a : G => a⁻¹
#align lie_group LieGroup
section PointwiseDivision
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} {F : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] {J : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 F F} {G : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace G] [ChartedSpace H G] [Group G] [LieGroup I G] {E' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H']
{I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'} {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H' M]
{E'' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E''] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E''] {H'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H'']
{I'' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E'' H''} {M' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H'' M']
{n : ℕ∞}
section
variable (I)
@[to_additive "In an additive Lie group, inversion is a smooth map."]
theorem smooth_inv : Smooth I I fun x : G => x⁻¹ :=
LieGroup.smooth_inv
#align smooth_inv smooth_inv
#align smooth_neg smooth_neg
@[to_additive "An additive Lie group is an additive topological group. This is not an instance for
technical reasons, see note [Design choices about smooth algebraic structures]."]
theorem topologicalGroup_of_lieGroup : TopologicalGroup G :=
{ continuousMul_of_smooth I with continuous_inv := (smooth_inv I).continuous }
#align topological_group_of_lie_group topologicalGroup_of_lieGroup
#align topological_add_group_of_lie_add_group topologicalAddGroup_of_lieAddGroup
end
@[to_additive]
theorem ContMDiffWithinAt.inv {f : M → G} {s : Set M} {x₀ : M}
(hf : ContMDiffWithinAt I' I n f s x₀) : ContMDiffWithinAt I' I n (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) s x₀ :=
((smooth_inv I).of_le le_top).contMDiffAt.contMDiffWithinAt.comp x₀ hf <| Set.mapsTo_univ _ _
#align cont_mdiff_within_at.inv ContMDiffWithinAt.inv
#align cont_mdiff_within_at.neg ContMDiffWithinAt.neg
@[to_additive]
theorem ContMDiffAt.inv {f : M → G} {x₀ : M} (hf : ContMDiffAt I' I n f x₀) :
ContMDiffAt I' I n (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) x₀ :=
((smooth_inv I).of_le le_top).contMDiffAt.comp x₀ hf
#align cont_mdiff_at.inv ContMDiffAt.inv
#align cont_mdiff_at.neg ContMDiffAt.neg
@[to_additive]
theorem ContMDiffOn.inv {f : M → G} {s : Set M} (hf : ContMDiffOn I' I n f s) :
ContMDiffOn I' I n (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).inv
#align cont_mdiff_on.inv ContMDiffOn.inv
#align cont_mdiff_on.neg ContMDiffOn.neg
@[to_additive]
theorem ContMDiff.inv {f : M → G} (hf : ContMDiff I' I n f) : ContMDiff I' I n fun x => (f x)⁻¹ :=
fun x => (hf x).inv
#align cont_mdiff.inv ContMDiff.inv
#align cont_mdiff.neg ContMDiff.neg
@[to_additive]
nonrec theorem SmoothWithinAt.inv {f : M → G} {s : Set M} {x₀ : M}
(hf : SmoothWithinAt I' I f s x₀) : SmoothWithinAt I' I (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) s x₀ :=
hf.inv
#align smooth_within_at.inv SmoothWithinAt.inv
#align smooth_within_at.neg SmoothWithinAt.neg
@[to_additive]
nonrec theorem SmoothAt.inv {f : M → G} {x₀ : M} (hf : SmoothAt I' I f x₀) :
SmoothAt I' I (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) x₀ :=
hf.inv
#align smooth_at.inv SmoothAt.inv
#align smooth_at.neg SmoothAt.neg
@[to_additive]
nonrec theorem SmoothOn.inv {f : M → G} {s : Set M} (hf : SmoothOn I' I f s) :
SmoothOn I' I (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) s :=
hf.inv
#align smooth_on.inv SmoothOn.inv
#align smooth_on.neg SmoothOn.neg
@[to_additive]
nonrec theorem Smooth.inv {f : M → G} (hf : Smooth I' I f) : Smooth I' I fun x => (f x)⁻¹ :=
hf.inv
#align smooth.inv Smooth.inv
#align smooth.neg Smooth.neg
@[to_additive]
theorem ContMDiffWithinAt.div {f g : M → G} {s : Set M} {x₀ : M}
(hf : ContMDiffWithinAt I' I n f s x₀) (hg : ContMDiffWithinAt I' I n g s x₀) :
ContMDiffWithinAt I' I n (fun x => f x / g x) s x₀ := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]; exact hf.mul hg.inv
#align cont_mdiff_within_at.div ContMDiffWithinAt.div
#align cont_mdiff_within_at.sub ContMDiffWithinAt.sub
@[to_additive]
theorem ContMDiffAt.div {f g : M → G} {x₀ : M} (hf : ContMDiffAt I' I n f x₀)
(hg : ContMDiffAt I' I n g x₀) : ContMDiffAt I' I n (fun x => f x / g x) x₀ := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]; exact hf.mul hg.inv
#align cont_mdiff_at.div ContMDiffAt.div
#align cont_mdiff_at.sub ContMDiffAt.sub
@[to_additive]
theorem ContMDiffOn.div {f g : M → G} {s : Set M} (hf : ContMDiffOn I' I n f s)
(hg : ContMDiffOn I' I n g s) : ContMDiffOn I' I n (fun x => f x / g x) s := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]; exact hf.mul hg.inv
#align cont_mdiff_on.div ContMDiffOn.div
#align cont_mdiff_on.sub ContMDiffOn.sub
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/Algebra/LieGroup.lean | 193 | 194 | theorem ContMDiff.div {f g : M → G} (hf : ContMDiff I' I n f) (hg : ContMDiff I' I n g) :
ContMDiff I' I n fun x => f x / g x := by | simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]; exact hf.mul hg.inv
|
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Subgraph
import Mathlib.Data.List.Rotate
#align_import combinatorics.simple_graph.connectivity from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b99e2d58a5e6861833fa8de11e51a81144258db4"
open Function
universe u v w
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type u} {V' : Type v} {V'' : Type w}
variable (G : SimpleGraph V) (G' : SimpleGraph V') (G'' : SimpleGraph V'')
inductive Walk : V → V → Type u
| nil {u : V} : Walk u u
| cons {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : Walk v w) : Walk u w
deriving DecidableEq
#align simple_graph.walk SimpleGraph.Walk
attribute [refl] Walk.nil
@[simps]
instance Walk.instInhabited (v : V) : Inhabited (G.Walk v v) := ⟨Walk.nil⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.inhabited SimpleGraph.Walk.instInhabited
@[match_pattern, reducible]
def Adj.toWalk {G : SimpleGraph V} {u v : V} (h : G.Adj u v) : G.Walk u v :=
Walk.cons h Walk.nil
#align simple_graph.adj.to_walk SimpleGraph.Adj.toWalk
namespace Walk
variable {G}
@[match_pattern]
abbrev nil' (u : V) : G.Walk u u := Walk.nil
#align simple_graph.walk.nil' SimpleGraph.Walk.nil'
@[match_pattern]
abbrev cons' (u v w : V) (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) : G.Walk u w := Walk.cons h p
#align simple_graph.walk.cons' SimpleGraph.Walk.cons'
protected def copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') : G.Walk u' v' :=
hu ▸ hv ▸ p
#align simple_graph.walk.copy SimpleGraph.Walk.copy
@[simp]
theorem copy_rfl_rfl {u v} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.copy rfl rfl = p := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.copy_rfl_rfl SimpleGraph.Walk.copy_rfl_rfl
@[simp]
theorem copy_copy {u v u' v' u'' v''} (p : G.Walk u v)
(hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') (hu' : u' = u'') (hv' : v' = v'') :
(p.copy hu hv).copy hu' hv' = p.copy (hu.trans hu') (hv.trans hv') := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.copy_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.copy_copy
@[simp]
theorem copy_nil {u u'} (hu : u = u') : (Walk.nil : G.Walk u u).copy hu hu = Walk.nil := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.copy_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.copy_nil
theorem copy_cons {u v w u' w'} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) (hu : u = u') (hw : w = w') :
(Walk.cons h p).copy hu hw = Walk.cons (hu ▸ h) (p.copy rfl hw) := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.copy_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.copy_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_copy {u v w v' w'} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v' w') (hv : v' = v) (hw : w' = w) :
Walk.cons h (p.copy hv hw) = (Walk.cons (hv ▸ h) p).copy rfl hw := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_copy
theorem exists_eq_cons_of_ne {u v : V} (hne : u ≠ v) :
∀ (p : G.Walk u v), ∃ (w : V) (h : G.Adj u w) (p' : G.Walk w v), p = cons h p'
| nil => (hne rfl).elim
| cons h p' => ⟨_, h, p', rfl⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.exists_eq_cons_of_ne SimpleGraph.Walk.exists_eq_cons_of_ne
def length {u v : V} : G.Walk u v → ℕ
| nil => 0
| cons _ q => q.length.succ
#align simple_graph.walk.length SimpleGraph.Walk.length
@[trans]
def append {u v w : V} : G.Walk u v → G.Walk v w → G.Walk u w
| nil, q => q
| cons h p, q => cons h (p.append q)
#align simple_graph.walk.append SimpleGraph.Walk.append
def concat {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) : G.Walk u w := p.append (cons h nil)
#align simple_graph.walk.concat SimpleGraph.Walk.concat
theorem concat_eq_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) :
p.concat h = p.append (cons h nil) := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_eq_append SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_eq_append
protected def reverseAux {u v w : V} : G.Walk u v → G.Walk u w → G.Walk v w
| nil, q => q
| cons h p, q => Walk.reverseAux p (cons (G.symm h) q)
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_aux SimpleGraph.Walk.reverseAux
@[symm]
def reverse {u v : V} (w : G.Walk u v) : G.Walk v u := w.reverseAux nil
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse
def getVert {u v : V} : G.Walk u v → ℕ → V
| nil, _ => u
| cons _ _, 0 => u
| cons _ q, n + 1 => q.getVert n
#align simple_graph.walk.get_vert SimpleGraph.Walk.getVert
@[simp]
theorem getVert_zero {u v} (w : G.Walk u v) : w.getVert 0 = u := by cases w <;> rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.get_vert_zero SimpleGraph.Walk.getVert_zero
theorem getVert_of_length_le {u v} (w : G.Walk u v) {i : ℕ} (hi : w.length ≤ i) :
w.getVert i = v := by
induction w generalizing i with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih =>
cases i
· cases hi
· exact ih (Nat.succ_le_succ_iff.1 hi)
#align simple_graph.walk.get_vert_of_length_le SimpleGraph.Walk.getVert_of_length_le
@[simp]
theorem getVert_length {u v} (w : G.Walk u v) : w.getVert w.length = v :=
w.getVert_of_length_le rfl.le
#align simple_graph.walk.get_vert_length SimpleGraph.Walk.getVert_length
theorem adj_getVert_succ {u v} (w : G.Walk u v) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < w.length) :
G.Adj (w.getVert i) (w.getVert (i + 1)) := by
induction w generalizing i with
| nil => cases hi
| cons hxy _ ih =>
cases i
· simp [getVert, hxy]
· exact ih (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.1 hi)
#align simple_graph.walk.adj_get_vert_succ SimpleGraph.Walk.adj_getVert_succ
@[simp]
theorem cons_append {u v w x : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) (q : G.Walk w x) :
(cons h p).append q = cons h (p.append q) := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_append SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_append
@[simp]
theorem cons_nil_append {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h nil).append p = cons h p := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_nil_append SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_nil_append
@[simp]
theorem append_nil {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.append nil = p := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => rw [cons_append, ih]
#align simple_graph.walk.append_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.append_nil
@[simp]
theorem nil_append {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : nil.append p = p :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.nil_append SimpleGraph.Walk.nil_append
theorem append_assoc {u v w x : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) (r : G.Walk w x) :
p.append (q.append r) = (p.append q).append r := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons h p' ih =>
dsimp only [append]
rw [ih]
#align simple_graph.walk.append_assoc SimpleGraph.Walk.append_assoc
@[simp]
theorem append_copy_copy {u v w u' v' w'} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w)
(hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') (hw : w = w') :
(p.copy hu hv).append (q.copy hv hw) = (p.append q).copy hu hw := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.append_copy_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.append_copy_copy
theorem concat_nil {u v : V} (h : G.Adj u v) : nil.concat h = cons h nil := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_nil
@[simp]
theorem concat_cons {u v w x : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) (h' : G.Adj w x) :
(cons h p).concat h' = cons h (p.concat h') := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_cons
theorem append_concat {u v w x : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) (h : G.Adj w x) :
p.append (q.concat h) = (p.append q).concat h := append_assoc _ _ _
#align simple_graph.walk.append_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.append_concat
theorem concat_append {u v w x : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) (q : G.Walk w x) :
(p.concat h).append q = p.append (cons h q) := by
rw [concat_eq_append, ← append_assoc, cons_nil_append]
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_append SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_append
theorem exists_cons_eq_concat {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
∃ (x : V) (q : G.Walk u x) (h' : G.Adj x w), cons h p = q.concat h' := by
induction p generalizing u with
| nil => exact ⟨_, nil, h, rfl⟩
| cons h' p ih =>
obtain ⟨y, q, h'', hc⟩ := ih h'
refine ⟨y, cons h q, h'', ?_⟩
rw [concat_cons, hc]
#align simple_graph.walk.exists_cons_eq_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.exists_cons_eq_concat
theorem exists_concat_eq_cons {u v w : V} :
∀ (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w),
∃ (x : V) (h' : G.Adj u x) (q : G.Walk x w), p.concat h = cons h' q
| nil, h => ⟨_, h, nil, rfl⟩
| cons h' p, h => ⟨_, h', Walk.concat p h, concat_cons _ _ _⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.exists_concat_eq_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.exists_concat_eq_cons
@[simp]
theorem reverse_nil {u : V} : (nil : G.Walk u u).reverse = nil := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_nil
theorem reverse_singleton {u v : V} (h : G.Adj u v) : (cons h nil).reverse = cons (G.symm h) nil :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_singleton SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_singleton
@[simp]
theorem cons_reverseAux {u v w x : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk w x) (h : G.Adj w u) :
(cons h p).reverseAux q = p.reverseAux (cons (G.symm h) q) := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_reverse_aux SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_reverseAux
@[simp]
protected theorem append_reverseAux {u v w x : V}
(p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) (r : G.Walk u x) :
(p.append q).reverseAux r = q.reverseAux (p.reverseAux r) := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons h _ ih => exact ih q (cons (G.symm h) r)
#align simple_graph.walk.append_reverse_aux SimpleGraph.Walk.append_reverseAux
@[simp]
protected theorem reverseAux_append {u v w x : V}
(p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk u w) (r : G.Walk w x) :
(p.reverseAux q).append r = p.reverseAux (q.append r) := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons h _ ih => simp [ih (cons (G.symm h) q)]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_aux_append SimpleGraph.Walk.reverseAux_append
protected theorem reverseAux_eq_reverse_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk u w) :
p.reverseAux q = p.reverse.append q := by simp [reverse]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_aux_eq_reverse_append SimpleGraph.Walk.reverseAux_eq_reverse_append
@[simp]
theorem reverse_cons {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h p).reverse = p.reverse.append (cons (G.symm h) nil) := by simp [reverse]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_cons
@[simp]
theorem reverse_copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).reverse = p.reverse.copy hv hu := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_copy
@[simp]
theorem reverse_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) :
(p.append q).reverse = q.reverse.append p.reverse := by simp [reverse]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_append SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_append
@[simp]
theorem reverse_concat {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) :
(p.concat h).reverse = cons (G.symm h) p.reverse := by simp [concat_eq_append]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_concat
@[simp]
theorem reverse_reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.reverse.reverse = p := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => simp [ih]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_reverse
@[simp]
theorem length_nil {u : V} : (nil : G.Walk u u).length = 0 := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.length_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.length_nil
@[simp]
theorem length_cons {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h p).length = p.length + 1 := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.length_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.length_cons
@[simp]
theorem length_copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).length = p.length := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.length_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.length_copy
@[simp]
theorem length_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) :
(p.append q).length = p.length + q.length := by
induction p with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ ih => simp [ih, add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc]
#align simple_graph.walk.length_append SimpleGraph.Walk.length_append
@[simp]
theorem length_concat {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) :
(p.concat h).length = p.length + 1 := length_append _ _
#align simple_graph.walk.length_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.length_concat
@[simp]
protected theorem length_reverseAux {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk u w) :
(p.reverseAux q).length = p.length + q.length := by
induction p with
| nil => simp!
| cons _ _ ih => simp [ih, Nat.succ_add, Nat.add_assoc]
#align simple_graph.walk.length_reverse_aux SimpleGraph.Walk.length_reverseAux
@[simp]
theorem length_reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.reverse.length = p.length := by simp [reverse]
#align simple_graph.walk.length_reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.length_reverse
theorem eq_of_length_eq_zero {u v : V} : ∀ {p : G.Walk u v}, p.length = 0 → u = v
| nil, _ => rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.eq_of_length_eq_zero SimpleGraph.Walk.eq_of_length_eq_zero
theorem adj_of_length_eq_one {u v : V} : ∀ {p : G.Walk u v}, p.length = 1 → G.Adj u v
| cons h nil, _ => h
@[simp]
theorem exists_length_eq_zero_iff {u v : V} : (∃ p : G.Walk u v, p.length = 0) ↔ u = v := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p, hp⟩
exact eq_of_length_eq_zero hp
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨nil, rfl⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.exists_length_eq_zero_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.exists_length_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem length_eq_zero_iff {u : V} {p : G.Walk u u} : p.length = 0 ↔ p = nil := by cases p <;> simp
#align simple_graph.walk.length_eq_zero_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.length_eq_zero_iff
theorem getVert_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) (i : ℕ) :
(p.append q).getVert i = if i < p.length then p.getVert i else q.getVert (i - p.length) := by
induction p generalizing i with
| nil => simp
| cons h p ih => cases i <;> simp [getVert, ih, Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff]
theorem getVert_reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (i : ℕ) :
p.reverse.getVert i = p.getVert (p.length - i) := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons h p ih =>
simp only [reverse_cons, getVert_append, length_reverse, ih, length_cons]
split_ifs
next hi =>
rw [Nat.succ_sub hi.le]
simp [getVert]
next hi =>
obtain rfl | hi' := Nat.eq_or_lt_of_not_lt hi
· simp [getVert]
· rw [Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt hi') rfl, Nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le hi']
simp [getVert]
theorem concat_ne_nil {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v u) : p.concat h ≠ nil := by
cases p <;> simp [concat]
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_ne_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_ne_nil
theorem concat_inj {u v v' w : V} {p : G.Walk u v} {h : G.Adj v w} {p' : G.Walk u v'}
{h' : G.Adj v' w} (he : p.concat h = p'.concat h') : ∃ hv : v = v', p.copy rfl hv = p' := by
induction p with
| nil =>
cases p'
· exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
· exfalso
simp only [concat_nil, concat_cons, cons.injEq] at he
obtain ⟨rfl, he⟩ := he
simp only [heq_iff_eq] at he
exact concat_ne_nil _ _ he.symm
| cons _ _ ih =>
rw [concat_cons] at he
cases p'
· exfalso
simp only [concat_nil, cons.injEq] at he
obtain ⟨rfl, he⟩ := he
rw [heq_iff_eq] at he
exact concat_ne_nil _ _ he
· rw [concat_cons, cons.injEq] at he
obtain ⟨rfl, he⟩ := he
rw [heq_iff_eq] at he
obtain ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ := ih he
exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_inj SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_inj
def support {u v : V} : G.Walk u v → List V
| nil => [u]
| cons _ p => u :: p.support
#align simple_graph.walk.support SimpleGraph.Walk.support
def darts {u v : V} : G.Walk u v → List G.Dart
| nil => []
| cons h p => ⟨(u, _), h⟩ :: p.darts
#align simple_graph.walk.darts SimpleGraph.Walk.darts
def edges {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : List (Sym2 V) := p.darts.map Dart.edge
#align simple_graph.walk.edges SimpleGraph.Walk.edges
@[simp]
theorem support_nil {u : V} : (nil : G.Walk u u).support = [u] := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.support_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.support_nil
@[simp]
theorem support_cons {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h p).support = u :: p.support := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.support_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.support_cons
@[simp]
theorem support_concat {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) :
(p.concat h).support = p.support.concat w := by
induction p <;> simp [*, concat_nil]
#align simple_graph.walk.support_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.support_concat
@[simp]
theorem support_copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).support = p.support := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.support_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.support_copy
theorem support_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
(p.append p').support = p.support ++ p'.support.tail := by
induction p <;> cases p' <;> simp [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.support_append SimpleGraph.Walk.support_append
@[simp]
theorem support_reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.reverse.support = p.support.reverse := by
induction p <;> simp [support_append, *]
#align simple_graph.walk.support_reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.support_reverse
@[simp]
theorem support_ne_nil {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.support ≠ [] := by cases p <;> simp
#align simple_graph.walk.support_ne_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.support_ne_nil
theorem tail_support_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
(p.append p').support.tail = p.support.tail ++ p'.support.tail := by
rw [support_append, List.tail_append_of_ne_nil _ _ (support_ne_nil _)]
#align simple_graph.walk.tail_support_append SimpleGraph.Walk.tail_support_append
theorem support_eq_cons {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.support = u :: p.support.tail := by
cases p <;> simp
#align simple_graph.walk.support_eq_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.support_eq_cons
@[simp]
theorem start_mem_support {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : u ∈ p.support := by cases p <;> simp
#align simple_graph.walk.start_mem_support SimpleGraph.Walk.start_mem_support
@[simp]
theorem end_mem_support {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : v ∈ p.support := by induction p <;> simp [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.end_mem_support SimpleGraph.Walk.end_mem_support
@[simp]
theorem support_nonempty {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : { w | w ∈ p.support }.Nonempty :=
⟨u, by simp⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.support_nonempty SimpleGraph.Walk.support_nonempty
theorem mem_support_iff {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) :
w ∈ p.support ↔ w = u ∨ w ∈ p.support.tail := by cases p <;> simp
#align simple_graph.walk.mem_support_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.mem_support_iff
theorem mem_support_nil_iff {u v : V} : u ∈ (nil : G.Walk v v).support ↔ u = v := by simp
#align simple_graph.walk.mem_support_nil_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.mem_support_nil_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_tail_support_append_iff {t u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
t ∈ (p.append p').support.tail ↔ t ∈ p.support.tail ∨ t ∈ p'.support.tail := by
rw [tail_support_append, List.mem_append]
#align simple_graph.walk.mem_tail_support_append_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.mem_tail_support_append_iff
@[simp]
theorem end_mem_tail_support_of_ne {u v : V} (h : u ≠ v) (p : G.Walk u v) : v ∈ p.support.tail := by
obtain ⟨_, _, _, rfl⟩ := exists_eq_cons_of_ne h p
simp
#align simple_graph.walk.end_mem_tail_support_of_ne SimpleGraph.Walk.end_mem_tail_support_of_ne
@[simp, nolint unusedHavesSuffices]
theorem mem_support_append_iff {t u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
t ∈ (p.append p').support ↔ t ∈ p.support ∨ t ∈ p'.support := by
simp only [mem_support_iff, mem_tail_support_append_iff]
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne t v <;> obtain rfl | h' := eq_or_ne t u <;>
-- this `have` triggers the unusedHavesSuffices linter:
(try have := h'.symm) <;> simp [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.mem_support_append_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.mem_support_append_iff
@[simp]
theorem subset_support_append_left {V : Type u} {G : SimpleGraph V} {u v w : V}
(p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) : p.support ⊆ (p.append q).support := by
simp only [Walk.support_append, List.subset_append_left]
#align simple_graph.walk.subset_support_append_left SimpleGraph.Walk.subset_support_append_left
@[simp]
theorem subset_support_append_right {V : Type u} {G : SimpleGraph V} {u v w : V}
(p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) : q.support ⊆ (p.append q).support := by
intro h
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [mem_support_append_iff, or_true_iff, imp_true_iff]
#align simple_graph.walk.subset_support_append_right SimpleGraph.Walk.subset_support_append_right
theorem coe_support {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) :
(p.support : Multiset V) = {u} + p.support.tail := by cases p <;> rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.coe_support SimpleGraph.Walk.coe_support
theorem coe_support_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
((p.append p').support : Multiset V) = {u} + p.support.tail + p'.support.tail := by
rw [support_append, ← Multiset.coe_add, coe_support]
#align simple_graph.walk.coe_support_append SimpleGraph.Walk.coe_support_append
theorem coe_support_append' [DecidableEq V] {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
((p.append p').support : Multiset V) = p.support + p'.support - {v} := by
rw [support_append, ← Multiset.coe_add]
simp only [coe_support]
rw [add_comm ({v} : Multiset V)]
simp only [← add_assoc, add_tsub_cancel_right]
#align simple_graph.walk.coe_support_append' SimpleGraph.Walk.coe_support_append'
theorem chain_adj_support {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) :
∀ (p : G.Walk v w), List.Chain G.Adj u p.support
| nil => List.Chain.cons h List.Chain.nil
| cons h' p => List.Chain.cons h (chain_adj_support h' p)
#align simple_graph.walk.chain_adj_support SimpleGraph.Walk.chain_adj_support
theorem chain'_adj_support {u v : V} : ∀ (p : G.Walk u v), List.Chain' G.Adj p.support
| nil => List.Chain.nil
| cons h p => chain_adj_support h p
#align simple_graph.walk.chain'_adj_support SimpleGraph.Walk.chain'_adj_support
theorem chain_dartAdj_darts {d : G.Dart} {v w : V} (h : d.snd = v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
List.Chain G.DartAdj d p.darts := by
induction p generalizing d with
| nil => exact List.Chain.nil
-- Porting note: needed to defer `h` and `rfl` to help elaboration
| cons h' p ih => exact List.Chain.cons (by exact h) (ih (by rfl))
#align simple_graph.walk.chain_dart_adj_darts SimpleGraph.Walk.chain_dartAdj_darts
theorem chain'_dartAdj_darts {u v : V} : ∀ (p : G.Walk u v), List.Chain' G.DartAdj p.darts
| nil => trivial
-- Porting note: needed to defer `rfl` to help elaboration
| cons h p => chain_dartAdj_darts (by rfl) p
#align simple_graph.walk.chain'_dart_adj_darts SimpleGraph.Walk.chain'_dartAdj_darts
theorem edges_subset_edgeSet {u v : V} :
∀ (p : G.Walk u v) ⦃e : Sym2 V⦄, e ∈ p.edges → e ∈ G.edgeSet
| cons h' p', e, h => by
cases h
· exact h'
next h' => exact edges_subset_edgeSet p' h'
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_subset_edge_set SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_subset_edgeSet
theorem adj_of_mem_edges {u v x y : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : s(x, y) ∈ p.edges) : G.Adj x y :=
edges_subset_edgeSet p h
#align simple_graph.walk.adj_of_mem_edges SimpleGraph.Walk.adj_of_mem_edges
@[simp]
theorem darts_nil {u : V} : (nil : G.Walk u u).darts = [] := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.darts_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.darts_nil
@[simp]
theorem darts_cons {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h p).darts = ⟨(u, v), h⟩ :: p.darts := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.darts_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.darts_cons
@[simp]
theorem darts_concat {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) :
(p.concat h).darts = p.darts.concat ⟨(v, w), h⟩ := by
induction p <;> simp [*, concat_nil]
#align simple_graph.walk.darts_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.darts_concat
@[simp]
theorem darts_copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).darts = p.darts := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.darts_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.darts_copy
@[simp]
theorem darts_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
(p.append p').darts = p.darts ++ p'.darts := by
induction p <;> simp [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.darts_append SimpleGraph.Walk.darts_append
@[simp]
theorem darts_reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) :
p.reverse.darts = (p.darts.map Dart.symm).reverse := by
induction p <;> simp [*, Sym2.eq_swap]
#align simple_graph.walk.darts_reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.darts_reverse
theorem mem_darts_reverse {u v : V} {d : G.Dart} {p : G.Walk u v} :
d ∈ p.reverse.darts ↔ d.symm ∈ p.darts := by simp
#align simple_graph.walk.mem_darts_reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.mem_darts_reverse
theorem cons_map_snd_darts {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : (u :: p.darts.map (·.snd)) = p.support := by
induction p <;> simp! [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_map_snd_darts SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_map_snd_darts
theorem map_snd_darts {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.darts.map (·.snd) = p.support.tail := by
simpa using congr_arg List.tail (cons_map_snd_darts p)
#align simple_graph.walk.map_snd_darts SimpleGraph.Walk.map_snd_darts
theorem map_fst_darts_append {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) :
p.darts.map (·.fst) ++ [v] = p.support := by
induction p <;> simp! [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.map_fst_darts_append SimpleGraph.Walk.map_fst_darts_append
theorem map_fst_darts {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.darts.map (·.fst) = p.support.dropLast := by
simpa! using congr_arg List.dropLast (map_fst_darts_append p)
#align simple_graph.walk.map_fst_darts SimpleGraph.Walk.map_fst_darts
@[simp]
theorem edges_nil {u : V} : (nil : G.Walk u u).edges = [] := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_nil
@[simp]
theorem edges_cons {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h p).edges = s(u, v) :: p.edges := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_cons
@[simp]
theorem edges_concat {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) :
(p.concat h).edges = p.edges.concat s(v, w) := by simp [edges]
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_concat
@[simp]
theorem edges_copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).edges = p.edges := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_copy
@[simp]
theorem edges_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
(p.append p').edges = p.edges ++ p'.edges := by simp [edges]
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_append SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_append
@[simp]
theorem edges_reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.reverse.edges = p.edges.reverse := by
simp [edges, List.map_reverse]
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_reverse
@[simp]
theorem length_support {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.support.length = p.length + 1 := by
induction p <;> simp [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.length_support SimpleGraph.Walk.length_support
@[simp]
theorem length_darts {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.darts.length = p.length := by
induction p <;> simp [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.length_darts SimpleGraph.Walk.length_darts
@[simp]
theorem length_edges {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.edges.length = p.length := by simp [edges]
#align simple_graph.walk.length_edges SimpleGraph.Walk.length_edges
theorem dart_fst_mem_support_of_mem_darts {u v : V} :
∀ (p : G.Walk u v) {d : G.Dart}, d ∈ p.darts → d.fst ∈ p.support
| cons h p', d, hd => by
simp only [support_cons, darts_cons, List.mem_cons] at hd ⊢
rcases hd with (rfl | hd)
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr (dart_fst_mem_support_of_mem_darts _ hd)
#align simple_graph.walk.dart_fst_mem_support_of_mem_darts SimpleGraph.Walk.dart_fst_mem_support_of_mem_darts
theorem dart_snd_mem_support_of_mem_darts {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) {d : G.Dart}
(h : d ∈ p.darts) : d.snd ∈ p.support := by
simpa using p.reverse.dart_fst_mem_support_of_mem_darts (by simp [h] : d.symm ∈ p.reverse.darts)
#align simple_graph.walk.dart_snd_mem_support_of_mem_darts SimpleGraph.Walk.dart_snd_mem_support_of_mem_darts
theorem fst_mem_support_of_mem_edges {t u v w : V} (p : G.Walk v w) (he : s(t, u) ∈ p.edges) :
t ∈ p.support := by
obtain ⟨d, hd, he⟩ := List.mem_map.mp he
rw [dart_edge_eq_mk'_iff'] at he
rcases he with (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· exact dart_fst_mem_support_of_mem_darts _ hd
· exact dart_snd_mem_support_of_mem_darts _ hd
#align simple_graph.walk.fst_mem_support_of_mem_edges SimpleGraph.Walk.fst_mem_support_of_mem_edges
theorem snd_mem_support_of_mem_edges {t u v w : V} (p : G.Walk v w) (he : s(t, u) ∈ p.edges) :
u ∈ p.support := by
rw [Sym2.eq_swap] at he
exact p.fst_mem_support_of_mem_edges he
#align simple_graph.walk.snd_mem_support_of_mem_edges SimpleGraph.Walk.snd_mem_support_of_mem_edges
theorem darts_nodup_of_support_nodup {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (h : p.support.Nodup) :
p.darts.Nodup := by
induction p with
| nil => simp
| cons _ p' ih =>
simp only [darts_cons, support_cons, List.nodup_cons] at h ⊢
exact ⟨fun h' => h.1 (dart_fst_mem_support_of_mem_darts p' h'), ih h.2⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.darts_nodup_of_support_nodup SimpleGraph.Walk.darts_nodup_of_support_nodup
theorem edges_nodup_of_support_nodup {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (h : p.support.Nodup) :
p.edges.Nodup := by
induction p with
| nil => simp
| cons _ p' ih =>
simp only [edges_cons, support_cons, List.nodup_cons] at h ⊢
exact ⟨fun h' => h.1 (fst_mem_support_of_mem_edges p' h'), ih h.2⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_nodup_of_support_nodup SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_nodup_of_support_nodup
inductive Nil : {v w : V} → G.Walk v w → Prop
| nil {u : V} : Nil (nil : G.Walk u u)
variable {u v w : V}
@[simp] lemma nil_nil : (nil : G.Walk u u).Nil := Nil.nil
@[simp] lemma not_nil_cons {h : G.Adj u v} {p : G.Walk v w} : ¬ (cons h p).Nil := nofun
instance (p : G.Walk v w) : Decidable p.Nil :=
match p with
| nil => isTrue .nil
| cons _ _ => isFalse nofun
protected lemma Nil.eq {p : G.Walk v w} : p.Nil → v = w | .nil => rfl
lemma not_nil_of_ne {p : G.Walk v w} : v ≠ w → ¬ p.Nil := mt Nil.eq
lemma nil_iff_support_eq {p : G.Walk v w} : p.Nil ↔ p.support = [v] := by
cases p <;> simp
lemma nil_iff_length_eq {p : G.Walk v w} : p.Nil ↔ p.length = 0 := by
cases p <;> simp
lemma not_nil_iff {p : G.Walk v w} :
¬ p.Nil ↔ ∃ (u : V) (h : G.Adj v u) (q : G.Walk u w), p = cons h q := by
cases p <;> simp [*]
lemma nil_iff_eq_nil : ∀ {p : G.Walk v v}, p.Nil ↔ p = nil
| .nil | .cons _ _ => by simp
alias ⟨Nil.eq_nil, _⟩ := nil_iff_eq_nil
@[elab_as_elim]
def notNilRec {motive : {u w : V} → (p : G.Walk u w) → (h : ¬ p.Nil) → Sort*}
(cons : {u v w : V} → (h : G.Adj u v) → (q : G.Walk v w) → motive (cons h q) not_nil_cons)
(p : G.Walk u w) : (hp : ¬ p.Nil) → motive p hp :=
match p with
| nil => fun hp => absurd .nil hp
| .cons h q => fun _ => cons h q
def sndOfNotNil (p : G.Walk v w) (hp : ¬ p.Nil) : V :=
p.notNilRec (@fun _ u _ _ _ => u) hp
@[simp] lemma adj_sndOfNotNil {p : G.Walk v w} (hp : ¬ p.Nil) :
G.Adj v (p.sndOfNotNil hp) :=
p.notNilRec (fun h _ => h) hp
def tail (p : G.Walk u v) (hp : ¬ p.Nil) : G.Walk (p.sndOfNotNil hp) v :=
p.notNilRec (fun _ q => q) hp
@[simps]
def firstDart (p : G.Walk v w) (hp : ¬ p.Nil) : G.Dart where
fst := v
snd := p.sndOfNotNil hp
adj := p.adj_sndOfNotNil hp
lemma edge_firstDart (p : G.Walk v w) (hp : ¬ p.Nil) :
(p.firstDart hp).edge = s(v, p.sndOfNotNil hp) := rfl
variable {x y : V} -- TODO: rename to u, v, w instead?
@[simp] lemma cons_tail_eq (p : G.Walk x y) (hp : ¬ p.Nil) :
cons (p.adj_sndOfNotNil hp) (p.tail hp) = p :=
p.notNilRec (fun _ _ => rfl) hp
@[simp] lemma cons_support_tail (p : G.Walk x y) (hp : ¬p.Nil) :
x :: (p.tail hp).support = p.support := by
rw [← support_cons, cons_tail_eq]
@[simp] lemma length_tail_add_one {p : G.Walk x y} (hp : ¬ p.Nil) :
(p.tail hp).length + 1 = p.length := by
rw [← length_cons, cons_tail_eq]
@[simp] lemma nil_copy {x' y' : V} {p : G.Walk x y} (hx : x = x') (hy : y = y') :
(p.copy hx hy).Nil = p.Nil := by
subst_vars; rfl
@[simp] lemma support_tail (p : G.Walk v v) (hp) :
(p.tail hp).support = p.support.tail := by
rw [← cons_support_tail p hp, List.tail_cons]
@[mk_iff isTrail_def]
structure IsTrail {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : Prop where
edges_nodup : p.edges.Nodup
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail_def SimpleGraph.Walk.isTrail_def
structure IsPath {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) extends IsTrail p : Prop where
support_nodup : p.support.Nodup
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path SimpleGraph.Walk.IsPath
-- Porting note: used to use `extends to_trail : is_trail p` in structure
protected lemma IsPath.isTrail {p : Walk G u v}(h : IsPath p) : IsTrail p := h.toIsTrail
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path.to_trail SimpleGraph.Walk.IsPath.isTrail
@[mk_iff isCircuit_def]
structure IsCircuit {u : V} (p : G.Walk u u) extends IsTrail p : Prop where
ne_nil : p ≠ nil
#align simple_graph.walk.is_circuit SimpleGraph.Walk.IsCircuit
#align simple_graph.walk.is_circuit_def SimpleGraph.Walk.isCircuit_def
-- Porting note: used to use `extends to_trail : is_trail p` in structure
protected lemma IsCircuit.isTrail {p : Walk G u u} (h : IsCircuit p) : IsTrail p := h.toIsTrail
#align simple_graph.walk.is_circuit.to_trail SimpleGraph.Walk.IsCircuit.isTrail
structure IsCycle {u : V} (p : G.Walk u u) extends IsCircuit p : Prop where
support_nodup : p.support.tail.Nodup
#align simple_graph.walk.is_cycle SimpleGraph.Walk.IsCycle
-- Porting note: used to use `extends to_circuit : is_circuit p` in structure
protected lemma IsCycle.isCircuit {p : Walk G u u} (h : IsCycle p) : IsCircuit p := h.toIsCircuit
#align simple_graph.walk.is_cycle.to_circuit SimpleGraph.Walk.IsCycle.isCircuit
@[simp]
theorem isTrail_copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).IsTrail ↔ p.IsTrail := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.isTrail_copy
theorem IsPath.mk' {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (h : p.support.Nodup) : p.IsPath :=
⟨⟨edges_nodup_of_support_nodup h⟩, h⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path.mk' SimpleGraph.Walk.IsPath.mk'
theorem isPath_def {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.IsPath ↔ p.support.Nodup :=
⟨IsPath.support_nodup, IsPath.mk'⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path_def SimpleGraph.Walk.isPath_def
@[simp]
theorem isPath_copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).IsPath ↔ p.IsPath := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.isPath_copy
@[simp]
theorem isCircuit_copy {u u'} (p : G.Walk u u) (hu : u = u') :
(p.copy hu hu).IsCircuit ↔ p.IsCircuit := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.is_circuit_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.isCircuit_copy
lemma IsCircuit.not_nil {p : G.Walk v v} (hp : IsCircuit p) : ¬ p.Nil := (hp.ne_nil ·.eq_nil)
theorem isCycle_def {u : V} (p : G.Walk u u) :
p.IsCycle ↔ p.IsTrail ∧ p ≠ nil ∧ p.support.tail.Nodup :=
Iff.intro (fun h => ⟨h.1.1, h.1.2, h.2⟩) fun h => ⟨⟨h.1, h.2.1⟩, h.2.2⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.is_cycle_def SimpleGraph.Walk.isCycle_def
@[simp]
theorem isCycle_copy {u u'} (p : G.Walk u u) (hu : u = u') :
(p.copy hu hu).IsCycle ↔ p.IsCycle := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.is_cycle_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.isCycle_copy
lemma IsCycle.not_nil {p : G.Walk v v} (hp : IsCycle p) : ¬ p.Nil := (hp.ne_nil ·.eq_nil)
@[simp]
theorem IsTrail.nil {u : V} : (nil : G.Walk u u).IsTrail :=
⟨by simp [edges]⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail.nil SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail.nil
theorem IsTrail.of_cons {u v w : V} {h : G.Adj u v} {p : G.Walk v w} :
(cons h p).IsTrail → p.IsTrail := by simp [isTrail_def]
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail.of_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail.of_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_isTrail_iff {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h p).IsTrail ↔ p.IsTrail ∧ s(u, v) ∉ p.edges := by simp [isTrail_def, and_comm]
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_is_trail_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_isTrail_iff
theorem IsTrail.reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : p.IsTrail) : p.reverse.IsTrail := by
simpa [isTrail_def] using h
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail.reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail.reverse
@[simp]
theorem reverse_isTrail_iff {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.reverse.IsTrail ↔ p.IsTrail := by
constructor <;>
· intro h
convert h.reverse _
try rw [reverse_reverse]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_is_trail_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_isTrail_iff
theorem IsTrail.of_append_left {u v w : V} {p : G.Walk u v} {q : G.Walk v w}
(h : (p.append q).IsTrail) : p.IsTrail := by
rw [isTrail_def, edges_append, List.nodup_append] at h
exact ⟨h.1⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail.of_append_left SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail.of_append_left
theorem IsTrail.of_append_right {u v w : V} {p : G.Walk u v} {q : G.Walk v w}
(h : (p.append q).IsTrail) : q.IsTrail := by
rw [isTrail_def, edges_append, List.nodup_append] at h
exact ⟨h.2.1⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail.of_append_right SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail.of_append_right
theorem IsTrail.count_edges_le_one [DecidableEq V] {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (h : p.IsTrail)
(e : Sym2 V) : p.edges.count e ≤ 1 :=
List.nodup_iff_count_le_one.mp h.edges_nodup e
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail.count_edges_le_one SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail.count_edges_le_one
theorem IsTrail.count_edges_eq_one [DecidableEq V] {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (h : p.IsTrail)
{e : Sym2 V} (he : e ∈ p.edges) : p.edges.count e = 1 :=
List.count_eq_one_of_mem h.edges_nodup he
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail.count_edges_eq_one SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail.count_edges_eq_one
theorem IsPath.nil {u : V} : (nil : G.Walk u u).IsPath := by constructor <;> simp
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path.nil SimpleGraph.Walk.IsPath.nil
theorem IsPath.of_cons {u v w : V} {h : G.Adj u v} {p : G.Walk v w} :
(cons h p).IsPath → p.IsPath := by simp [isPath_def]
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path.of_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.IsPath.of_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_isPath_iff {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h p).IsPath ↔ p.IsPath ∧ u ∉ p.support := by
constructor <;> simp (config := { contextual := true }) [isPath_def]
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_is_path_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_isPath_iff
protected lemma IsPath.cons {p : Walk G v w} (hp : p.IsPath) (hu : u ∉ p.support) {h : G.Adj u v} :
(cons h p).IsPath :=
(cons_isPath_iff _ _).2 ⟨hp, hu⟩
@[simp]
theorem isPath_iff_eq_nil {u : V} (p : G.Walk u u) : p.IsPath ↔ p = nil := by
cases p <;> simp [IsPath.nil]
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path_iff_eq_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.isPath_iff_eq_nil
theorem IsPath.reverse {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (h : p.IsPath) : p.reverse.IsPath := by
simpa [isPath_def] using h
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path.reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.IsPath.reverse
@[simp]
theorem isPath_reverse_iff {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.reverse.IsPath ↔ p.IsPath := by
constructor <;> intro h <;> convert h.reverse; simp
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path_reverse_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.isPath_reverse_iff
theorem IsPath.of_append_left {u v w : V} {p : G.Walk u v} {q : G.Walk v w} :
(p.append q).IsPath → p.IsPath := by
simp only [isPath_def, support_append]
exact List.Nodup.of_append_left
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path.of_append_left SimpleGraph.Walk.IsPath.of_append_left
theorem IsPath.of_append_right {u v w : V} {p : G.Walk u v} {q : G.Walk v w}
(h : (p.append q).IsPath) : q.IsPath := by
rw [← isPath_reverse_iff] at h ⊢
rw [reverse_append] at h
apply h.of_append_left
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path.of_append_right SimpleGraph.Walk.IsPath.of_append_right
@[simp]
theorem IsCycle.not_of_nil {u : V} : ¬(nil : G.Walk u u).IsCycle := fun h => h.ne_nil rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.is_cycle.not_of_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.IsCycle.not_of_nil
lemma IsCycle.ne_bot : ∀ {p : G.Walk u u}, p.IsCycle → G ≠ ⊥
| nil, hp => by cases hp.ne_nil rfl
| cons h _, hp => by rintro rfl; exact h
lemma IsCycle.three_le_length {v : V} {p : G.Walk v v} (hp : p.IsCycle) : 3 ≤ p.length := by
have ⟨⟨hp, hp'⟩, _⟩ := hp
match p with
| .nil => simp at hp'
| .cons h .nil => simp at h
| .cons _ (.cons _ .nil) => simp at hp
| .cons _ (.cons _ (.cons _ _)) => simp_rw [SimpleGraph.Walk.length_cons]; omega
theorem cons_isCycle_iff {u v : V} (p : G.Walk v u) (h : G.Adj u v) :
(Walk.cons h p).IsCycle ↔ p.IsPath ∧ ¬s(u, v) ∈ p.edges := by
simp only [Walk.isCycle_def, Walk.isPath_def, Walk.isTrail_def, edges_cons, List.nodup_cons,
support_cons, List.tail_cons]
have : p.support.Nodup → p.edges.Nodup := edges_nodup_of_support_nodup
tauto
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_is_cycle_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_isCycle_iff
lemma IsPath.tail {p : G.Walk u v} (hp : p.IsPath) (hp' : ¬ p.Nil) : (p.tail hp').IsPath := by
rw [Walk.isPath_def] at hp ⊢
rw [← cons_support_tail _ hp', List.nodup_cons] at hp
exact hp.2
instance [DecidableEq V] {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : Decidable p.IsPath := by
rw [isPath_def]
infer_instance
theorem IsPath.length_lt [Fintype V] {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (hp : p.IsPath) :
p.length < Fintype.card V := by
rw [Nat.lt_iff_add_one_le, ← length_support]
exact hp.support_nodup.length_le_card
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path.length_lt SimpleGraph.Walk.IsPath.length_lt
section WalkDecomp
variable [DecidableEq V]
def takeUntil {v w : V} : ∀ (p : G.Walk v w) (u : V), u ∈ p.support → G.Walk v u
| nil, u, h => by rw [mem_support_nil_iff.mp h]
| cons r p, u, h =>
if hx : v = u then
by subst u; exact Walk.nil
else
cons r (takeUntil p u <| by
cases h
· exact (hx rfl).elim
· assumption)
#align simple_graph.walk.take_until SimpleGraph.Walk.takeUntil
def dropUntil {v w : V} : ∀ (p : G.Walk v w) (u : V), u ∈ p.support → G.Walk u w
| nil, u, h => by rw [mem_support_nil_iff.mp h]
| cons r p, u, h =>
if hx : v = u then by
subst u
exact cons r p
else dropUntil p u <| by
cases h
· exact (hx rfl).elim
· assumption
#align simple_graph.walk.drop_until SimpleGraph.Walk.dropUntil
@[simp]
theorem take_spec {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk v w) (h : u ∈ p.support) :
(p.takeUntil u h).append (p.dropUntil u h) = p := by
induction p
· rw [mem_support_nil_iff] at h
subst u
rfl
· cases h
· simp!
· simp! only
split_ifs with h' <;> subst_vars <;> simp [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.take_spec SimpleGraph.Walk.take_spec
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Connectivity.lean | 1,206 | 1,212 | theorem mem_support_iff_exists_append {V : Type u} {G : SimpleGraph V} {u v w : V}
{p : G.Walk u v} : w ∈ p.support ↔ ∃ (q : G.Walk u w) (r : G.Walk w v), p = q.append r := by |
classical
constructor
· exact fun h => ⟨_, _, (p.take_spec h).symm⟩
· rintro ⟨q, r, rfl⟩
simp only [mem_support_append_iff, end_mem_support, start_mem_support, or_self_iff]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Indicator
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousOn
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.ENNReal
#align_import topology.semicontinuous from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
open Topology ENNReal
open Set Function Filter
variable {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {β : Type*} [Preorder β] {f g : α → β} {x : α}
{s t : Set α} {y z : β}
def LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (x : α) :=
∀ y < f x, ∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝[s] x, y < f x'
#align lower_semicontinuous_within_at LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt
def LowerSemicontinuousOn (f : α → β) (s : Set α) :=
∀ x ∈ s, LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x
#align lower_semicontinuous_on LowerSemicontinuousOn
def LowerSemicontinuousAt (f : α → β) (x : α) :=
∀ y < f x, ∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝 x, y < f x'
#align lower_semicontinuous_at LowerSemicontinuousAt
def LowerSemicontinuous (f : α → β) :=
∀ x, LowerSemicontinuousAt f x
#align lower_semicontinuous LowerSemicontinuous
def UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (x : α) :=
∀ y, f x < y → ∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝[s] x, f x' < y
#align upper_semicontinuous_within_at UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt
def UpperSemicontinuousOn (f : α → β) (s : Set α) :=
∀ x ∈ s, UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x
#align upper_semicontinuous_on UpperSemicontinuousOn
def UpperSemicontinuousAt (f : α → β) (x : α) :=
∀ y, f x < y → ∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝 x, f x' < y
#align upper_semicontinuous_at UpperSemicontinuousAt
def UpperSemicontinuous (f : α → β) :=
∀ x, UpperSemicontinuousAt f x
#align upper_semicontinuous UpperSemicontinuous
theorem LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt.mono (h : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x) (hst : t ⊆ s) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f t x := fun y hy =>
Filter.Eventually.filter_mono (nhdsWithin_mono _ hst) (h y hy)
#align lower_semicontinuous_within_at.mono LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt.mono
theorem lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f univ x ↔ LowerSemicontinuousAt f x := by
simp [LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt, LowerSemicontinuousAt, nhdsWithin_univ]
#align lower_semicontinuous_within_at_univ_iff lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff
theorem LowerSemicontinuousAt.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (s : Set α)
(h : LowerSemicontinuousAt f x) : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x := fun y hy =>
Filter.Eventually.filter_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds (h y hy)
#align lower_semicontinuous_at.lower_semicontinuous_within_at LowerSemicontinuousAt.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt
theorem LowerSemicontinuousOn.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (h : LowerSemicontinuousOn f s)
(hx : x ∈ s) : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x :=
h x hx
#align lower_semicontinuous_on.lower_semicontinuous_within_at LowerSemicontinuousOn.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt
theorem LowerSemicontinuousOn.mono (h : LowerSemicontinuousOn f s) (hst : t ⊆ s) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn f t := fun x hx => (h x (hst hx)).mono hst
#align lower_semicontinuous_on.mono LowerSemicontinuousOn.mono
theorem lowerSemicontinuousOn_univ_iff : LowerSemicontinuousOn f univ ↔ LowerSemicontinuous f := by
simp [LowerSemicontinuousOn, LowerSemicontinuous, lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff]
#align lower_semicontinuous_on_univ_iff lowerSemicontinuousOn_univ_iff
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.lowerSemicontinuousAt (h : LowerSemicontinuous f) (x : α) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt f x :=
h x
#align lower_semicontinuous.lower_semicontinuous_at LowerSemicontinuous.lowerSemicontinuousAt
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (h : LowerSemicontinuous f) (s : Set α)
(x : α) : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x :=
(h x).lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt s
#align lower_semicontinuous.lower_semicontinuous_within_at LowerSemicontinuous.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.lowerSemicontinuousOn (h : LowerSemicontinuous f) (s : Set α) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn f s := fun x _hx => h.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt s x
#align lower_semicontinuous.lower_semicontinuous_on LowerSemicontinuous.lowerSemicontinuousOn
theorem lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_const : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun _x => z) s x :=
fun _y hy => Filter.eventually_of_forall fun _x => hy
#align lower_semicontinuous_within_at_const lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_const
theorem lowerSemicontinuousAt_const : LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun _x => z) x := fun _y hy =>
Filter.eventually_of_forall fun _x => hy
#align lower_semicontinuous_at_const lowerSemicontinuousAt_const
theorem lowerSemicontinuousOn_const : LowerSemicontinuousOn (fun _x => z) s := fun _x _hx =>
lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_const
#align lower_semicontinuous_on_const lowerSemicontinuousOn_const
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_const : LowerSemicontinuous fun _x : α => z := fun _x =>
lowerSemicontinuousAt_const
#align lower_semicontinuous_const lowerSemicontinuous_const
section
variable [Zero β]
theorem IsOpen.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator (hs : IsOpen s) (hy : 0 ≤ y) :
LowerSemicontinuous (indicator s fun _x => y) := by
intro x z hz
by_cases h : x ∈ s <;> simp [h] at hz
· filter_upwards [hs.mem_nhds h]
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [hz]
· refine Filter.eventually_of_forall fun x' => ?_
by_cases h' : x' ∈ s <;> simp [h', hz.trans_le hy, hz]
#align is_open.lower_semicontinuous_indicator IsOpen.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator
theorem IsOpen.lowerSemicontinuousOn_indicator (hs : IsOpen s) (hy : 0 ≤ y) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn (indicator s fun _x => y) t :=
(hs.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator hy).lowerSemicontinuousOn t
#align is_open.lower_semicontinuous_on_indicator IsOpen.lowerSemicontinuousOn_indicator
theorem IsOpen.lowerSemicontinuousAt_indicator (hs : IsOpen s) (hy : 0 ≤ y) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (indicator s fun _x => y) x :=
(hs.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator hy).lowerSemicontinuousAt x
#align is_open.lower_semicontinuous_at_indicator IsOpen.lowerSemicontinuousAt_indicator
theorem IsOpen.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_indicator (hs : IsOpen s) (hy : 0 ≤ y) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (indicator s fun _x => y) t x :=
(hs.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator hy).lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt t x
#align is_open.lower_semicontinuous_within_at_indicator IsOpen.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_indicator
theorem IsClosed.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator (hs : IsClosed s) (hy : y ≤ 0) :
LowerSemicontinuous (indicator s fun _x => y) := by
intro x z hz
by_cases h : x ∈ s <;> simp [h] at hz
· refine Filter.eventually_of_forall fun x' => ?_
by_cases h' : x' ∈ s <;> simp [h', hz, hz.trans_le hy]
· filter_upwards [hs.isOpen_compl.mem_nhds h]
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [hz]
#align is_closed.lower_semicontinuous_indicator IsClosed.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator
theorem IsClosed.lowerSemicontinuousOn_indicator (hs : IsClosed s) (hy : y ≤ 0) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn (indicator s fun _x => y) t :=
(hs.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator hy).lowerSemicontinuousOn t
#align is_closed.lower_semicontinuous_on_indicator IsClosed.lowerSemicontinuousOn_indicator
theorem IsClosed.lowerSemicontinuousAt_indicator (hs : IsClosed s) (hy : y ≤ 0) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (indicator s fun _x => y) x :=
(hs.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator hy).lowerSemicontinuousAt x
#align is_closed.lower_semicontinuous_at_indicator IsClosed.lowerSemicontinuousAt_indicator
theorem IsClosed.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_indicator (hs : IsClosed s) (hy : y ≤ 0) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (indicator s fun _x => y) t x :=
(hs.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator hy).lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt t x
#align is_closed.lower_semicontinuous_within_at_indicator IsClosed.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_indicator
end
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isOpen_preimage :
LowerSemicontinuous f ↔ ∀ y, IsOpen (f ⁻¹' Ioi y) :=
⟨fun H y => isOpen_iff_mem_nhds.2 fun x hx => H x y hx, fun H _x y y_lt =>
IsOpen.mem_nhds (H y) y_lt⟩
#align lower_semicontinuous_iff_is_open_preimage lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isOpen_preimage
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.isOpen_preimage (hf : LowerSemicontinuous f) (y : β) :
IsOpen (f ⁻¹' Ioi y) :=
lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isOpen_preimage.1 hf y
#align lower_semicontinuous.is_open_preimage LowerSemicontinuous.isOpen_preimage
section
variable {γ : Type*} [LinearOrder γ]
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_preimage {f : α → γ} :
LowerSemicontinuous f ↔ ∀ y, IsClosed (f ⁻¹' Iic y) := by
rw [lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isOpen_preimage]
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, ← preimage_compl, compl_Iic]
#align lower_semicontinuous_iff_is_closed_preimage lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_preimage
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.isClosed_preimage {f : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuous f) (y : γ) :
IsClosed (f ⁻¹' Iic y) :=
lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_preimage.1 hf y
#align lower_semicontinuous.is_closed_preimage LowerSemicontinuous.isClosed_preimage
variable [TopologicalSpace γ] [OrderTopology γ]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt {f : α → γ} (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x := fun _y hy => h (Ioi_mem_nhds hy)
#align continuous_within_at.lower_semicontinuous_within_at ContinuousWithinAt.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt
theorem ContinuousAt.lowerSemicontinuousAt {f : α → γ} (h : ContinuousAt f x) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt f x := fun _y hy => h (Ioi_mem_nhds hy)
#align continuous_at.lower_semicontinuous_at ContinuousAt.lowerSemicontinuousAt
theorem ContinuousOn.lowerSemicontinuousOn {f : α → γ} (h : ContinuousOn f s) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn f s := fun x hx => (h x hx).lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt
#align continuous_on.lower_semicontinuous_on ContinuousOn.lowerSemicontinuousOn
theorem Continuous.lowerSemicontinuous {f : α → γ} (h : Continuous f) : LowerSemicontinuous f :=
fun _x => h.continuousAt.lowerSemicontinuousAt
#align continuous.lower_semicontinuous Continuous.lowerSemicontinuous
end
section
variable {γ : Type*} [CompleteLinearOrder γ] [DenselyOrdered γ]
theorem lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_iff_le_liminf {f : α → γ} :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ f x ≤ liminf f (𝓝[s] x) := by
constructor
· intro hf; unfold LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt at hf
contrapose! hf
obtain ⟨y, lty, ylt⟩ := exists_between hf; use y
exact ⟨ylt, fun h => lty.not_le
(le_liminf_of_le (by isBoundedDefault) (h.mono fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx))⟩
exact fun hf y ylt => eventually_lt_of_lt_liminf (ylt.trans_le hf)
alias ⟨LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt.le_liminf, _⟩ := lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_iff_le_liminf
theorem lowerSemicontinuousAt_iff_le_liminf {f : α → γ} :
LowerSemicontinuousAt f x ↔ f x ≤ liminf f (𝓝 x) := by
rw [← lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff, lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_iff_le_liminf,
← nhdsWithin_univ]
alias ⟨LowerSemicontinuousAt.le_liminf, _⟩ := lowerSemicontinuousAt_iff_le_liminf
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_iff_le_liminf {f : α → γ} :
LowerSemicontinuous f ↔ ∀ x, f x ≤ liminf f (𝓝 x) := by
simp only [← lowerSemicontinuousAt_iff_le_liminf, LowerSemicontinuous]
alias ⟨LowerSemicontinuous.le_liminf, _⟩ := lowerSemicontinuous_iff_le_liminf
theorem lowerSemicontinuousOn_iff_le_liminf {f : α → γ} :
LowerSemicontinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≤ liminf f (𝓝[s] x) := by
simp only [← lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_iff_le_liminf, LowerSemicontinuousOn]
alias ⟨LowerSemicontinuousOn.le_liminf, _⟩ := lowerSemicontinuousOn_iff_le_liminf
variable [TopologicalSpace γ] [OrderTopology γ]
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_epigraph {f : α → γ} :
LowerSemicontinuous f ↔ IsClosed {p : α × γ | f p.1 ≤ p.2} := by
constructor
· rw [lowerSemicontinuous_iff_le_liminf, isClosed_iff_forall_filter]
rintro hf ⟨x, y⟩ F F_ne h h'
rw [nhds_prod_eq, le_prod] at h'
calc f x ≤ liminf f (𝓝 x) := hf x
_ ≤ liminf f (map Prod.fst F) := liminf_le_liminf_of_le h'.1
_ = liminf (f ∘ Prod.fst) F := (Filter.liminf_comp _ _ _).symm
_ ≤ liminf Prod.snd F := liminf_le_liminf <| by
simpa using (eventually_principal.2 fun (_ : α × γ) ↦ id).filter_mono h
_ = y := h'.2.liminf_eq
· rw [lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_preimage]
exact fun hf y ↦ hf.preimage (Continuous.Prod.mk_left y)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-02")]
alias lowerSemicontinuous_iff_IsClosed_epigraph := lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_epigraph
alias ⟨LowerSemicontinuous.isClosed_epigraph, _⟩ := lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_epigraph
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-02")]
alias LowerSemicontinuous.IsClosed_epigraph := LowerSemicontinuous.isClosed_epigraph
end
section
variable {γ : Type*} [LinearOrder γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] [OrderTopology γ]
variable {δ : Type*} [LinearOrder δ] [TopologicalSpace δ] [OrderTopology δ]
variable {ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ι]
theorem ContinuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ}
(hg : ContinuousAt g (f x)) (hf : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x) (gmon : Monotone g) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x := by
intro y hy
by_cases h : ∃ l, l < f x
· obtain ⟨z, zlt, hz⟩ : ∃ z < f x, Ioc z (f x) ⊆ g ⁻¹' Ioi y :=
exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds (hg (Ioi_mem_nhds hy)) h
filter_upwards [hf z zlt] with a ha
calc
y < g (min (f x) (f a)) := hz (by simp [zlt, ha, le_refl])
_ ≤ g (f a) := gmon (min_le_right _ _)
· simp only [not_exists, not_lt] at h
exact Filter.eventually_of_forall fun a => hy.trans_le (gmon (h (f a)))
#align continuous_at.comp_lower_semicontinuous_within_at ContinuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt
theorem ContinuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousAt {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ} (hg : ContinuousAt g (f x))
(hf : LowerSemicontinuousAt f x) (gmon : Monotone g) : LowerSemicontinuousAt (g ∘ f) x := by
simp only [← lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff] at hf ⊢
exact hg.comp_lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt hf gmon
#align continuous_at.comp_lower_semicontinuous_at ContinuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousAt
theorem Continuous.comp_lowerSemicontinuousOn {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ} (hg : Continuous g)
(hf : LowerSemicontinuousOn f s) (gmon : Monotone g) : LowerSemicontinuousOn (g ∘ f) s :=
fun x hx => hg.continuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (hf x hx) gmon
#align continuous.comp_lower_semicontinuous_on Continuous.comp_lowerSemicontinuousOn
theorem Continuous.comp_lowerSemicontinuous {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ} (hg : Continuous g)
(hf : LowerSemicontinuous f) (gmon : Monotone g) : LowerSemicontinuous (g ∘ f) := fun x =>
hg.continuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousAt (hf x) gmon
#align continuous.comp_lower_semicontinuous Continuous.comp_lowerSemicontinuous
theorem ContinuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_antitone {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ}
(hg : ContinuousAt g (f x)) (hf : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x) (gmon : Antitone g) :
UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x :=
@ContinuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt α _ x s γ _ _ _ δᵒᵈ _ _ _ g f hg hf gmon
#align continuous_at.comp_lower_semicontinuous_within_at_antitone ContinuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_antitone
theorem ContinuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousAt_antitone {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ}
(hg : ContinuousAt g (f x)) (hf : LowerSemicontinuousAt f x) (gmon : Antitone g) :
UpperSemicontinuousAt (g ∘ f) x :=
@ContinuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousAt α _ x γ _ _ _ δᵒᵈ _ _ _ g f hg hf gmon
#align continuous_at.comp_lower_semicontinuous_at_antitone ContinuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousAt_antitone
theorem Continuous.comp_lowerSemicontinuousOn_antitone {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ} (hg : Continuous g)
(hf : LowerSemicontinuousOn f s) (gmon : Antitone g) : UpperSemicontinuousOn (g ∘ f) s :=
fun x hx => hg.continuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_antitone (hf x hx) gmon
#align continuous.comp_lower_semicontinuous_on_antitone Continuous.comp_lowerSemicontinuousOn_antitone
theorem Continuous.comp_lowerSemicontinuous_antitone {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ} (hg : Continuous g)
(hf : LowerSemicontinuous f) (gmon : Antitone g) : UpperSemicontinuous (g ∘ f) := fun x =>
hg.continuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousAt_antitone (hf x) gmon
#align continuous.comp_lower_semicontinuous_antitone Continuous.comp_lowerSemicontinuous_antitone
theorem LowerSemicontinuousAt.comp_continuousAt {f : α → β} {g : ι → α} {x : ι}
(hf : LowerSemicontinuousAt f (g x)) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun x ↦ f (g x)) x :=
fun _ lt ↦ hg.eventually (hf _ lt)
theorem LowerSemicontinuousAt.comp_continuousAt_of_eq {f : α → β} {g : ι → α} {y : α} {x : ι}
(hf : LowerSemicontinuousAt f y) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) (hy : g x = y) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun x ↦ f (g x)) x := by
rw [← hy] at hf
exact comp_continuousAt hf hg
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.comp_continuous {f : α → β} {g : ι → α}
(hf : LowerSemicontinuous f) (hg : Continuous g) : LowerSemicontinuous fun x ↦ f (g x) :=
fun x ↦ (hf (g x)).comp_continuousAt hg.continuousAt
end
section
variable {ι : Type*} {γ : Type*} [LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ]
[OrderTopology γ]
theorem LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt.add' {f g : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x)
(hg : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt g s x)
(hcont : ContinuousAt (fun p : γ × γ => p.1 + p.2) (f x, g x)) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun z => f z + g z) s x := by
intro y hy
obtain ⟨u, v, u_open, xu, v_open, xv, h⟩ :
∃ u v : Set γ,
IsOpen u ∧ f x ∈ u ∧ IsOpen v ∧ g x ∈ v ∧ u ×ˢ v ⊆ { p : γ × γ | y < p.fst + p.snd } :=
mem_nhds_prod_iff'.1 (hcont (isOpen_Ioi.mem_nhds hy))
by_cases hx₁ : ∃ l, l < f x
· obtain ⟨z₁, z₁lt, h₁⟩ : ∃ z₁ < f x, Ioc z₁ (f x) ⊆ u :=
exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds (u_open.mem_nhds xu) hx₁
by_cases hx₂ : ∃ l, l < g x
· obtain ⟨z₂, z₂lt, h₂⟩ : ∃ z₂ < g x, Ioc z₂ (g x) ⊆ v :=
exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds (v_open.mem_nhds xv) hx₂
filter_upwards [hf z₁ z₁lt, hg z₂ z₂lt] with z h₁z h₂z
have A1 : min (f z) (f x) ∈ u := by
by_cases H : f z ≤ f x
· simp [H]
exact h₁ ⟨h₁z, H⟩
· simp [le_of_not_le H]
exact h₁ ⟨z₁lt, le_rfl⟩
have A2 : min (g z) (g x) ∈ v := by
by_cases H : g z ≤ g x
· simp [H]
exact h₂ ⟨h₂z, H⟩
· simp [le_of_not_le H]
exact h₂ ⟨z₂lt, le_rfl⟩
have : (min (f z) (f x), min (g z) (g x)) ∈ u ×ˢ v := ⟨A1, A2⟩
calc
y < min (f z) (f x) + min (g z) (g x) := h this
_ ≤ f z + g z := add_le_add (min_le_left _ _) (min_le_left _ _)
· simp only [not_exists, not_lt] at hx₂
filter_upwards [hf z₁ z₁lt] with z h₁z
have A1 : min (f z) (f x) ∈ u := by
by_cases H : f z ≤ f x
· simp [H]
exact h₁ ⟨h₁z, H⟩
· simp [le_of_not_le H]
exact h₁ ⟨z₁lt, le_rfl⟩
have : (min (f z) (f x), g x) ∈ u ×ˢ v := ⟨A1, xv⟩
calc
y < min (f z) (f x) + g x := h this
_ ≤ f z + g z := add_le_add (min_le_left _ _) (hx₂ (g z))
· simp only [not_exists, not_lt] at hx₁
by_cases hx₂ : ∃ l, l < g x
· obtain ⟨z₂, z₂lt, h₂⟩ : ∃ z₂ < g x, Ioc z₂ (g x) ⊆ v :=
exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds (v_open.mem_nhds xv) hx₂
filter_upwards [hg z₂ z₂lt] with z h₂z
have A2 : min (g z) (g x) ∈ v := by
by_cases H : g z ≤ g x
· simp [H]
exact h₂ ⟨h₂z, H⟩
· simp [le_of_not_le H]
exact h₂ ⟨z₂lt, le_rfl⟩
have : (f x, min (g z) (g x)) ∈ u ×ˢ v := ⟨xu, A2⟩
calc
y < f x + min (g z) (g x) := h this
_ ≤ f z + g z := add_le_add (hx₁ (f z)) (min_le_left _ _)
· simp only [not_exists, not_lt] at hx₁ hx₂
apply Filter.eventually_of_forall
intro z
have : (f x, g x) ∈ u ×ˢ v := ⟨xu, xv⟩
calc
y < f x + g x := h this
_ ≤ f z + g z := add_le_add (hx₁ (f z)) (hx₂ (g z))
#align lower_semicontinuous_within_at.add' LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt.add'
theorem LowerSemicontinuousAt.add' {f g : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuousAt f x)
(hg : LowerSemicontinuousAt g x)
(hcont : ContinuousAt (fun p : γ × γ => p.1 + p.2) (f x, g x)) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun z => f z + g z) x := by
simp_rw [← lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff] at *
exact hf.add' hg hcont
#align lower_semicontinuous_at.add' LowerSemicontinuousAt.add'
theorem LowerSemicontinuousOn.add' {f g : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuousOn f s)
(hg : LowerSemicontinuousOn g s)
(hcont : ∀ x ∈ s, ContinuousAt (fun p : γ × γ => p.1 + p.2) (f x, g x)) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn (fun z => f z + g z) s := fun x hx =>
(hf x hx).add' (hg x hx) (hcont x hx)
#align lower_semicontinuous_on.add' LowerSemicontinuousOn.add'
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.add' {f g : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuous f)
(hg : LowerSemicontinuous g)
(hcont : ∀ x, ContinuousAt (fun p : γ × γ => p.1 + p.2) (f x, g x)) :
LowerSemicontinuous fun z => f z + g z := fun x => (hf x).add' (hg x) (hcont x)
#align lower_semicontinuous.add' LowerSemicontinuous.add'
variable [ContinuousAdd γ]
theorem LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt.add {f g : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x)
(hg : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt g s x) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun z => f z + g z) s x :=
hf.add' hg continuous_add.continuousAt
#align lower_semicontinuous_within_at.add LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt.add
theorem LowerSemicontinuousAt.add {f g : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuousAt f x)
(hg : LowerSemicontinuousAt g x) : LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun z => f z + g z) x :=
hf.add' hg continuous_add.continuousAt
#align lower_semicontinuous_at.add LowerSemicontinuousAt.add
theorem LowerSemicontinuousOn.add {f g : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuousOn f s)
(hg : LowerSemicontinuousOn g s) : LowerSemicontinuousOn (fun z => f z + g z) s :=
hf.add' hg fun _x _hx => continuous_add.continuousAt
#align lower_semicontinuous_on.add LowerSemicontinuousOn.add
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.add {f g : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuous f)
(hg : LowerSemicontinuous g) : LowerSemicontinuous fun z => f z + g z :=
hf.add' hg fun _x => continuous_add.continuousAt
#align lower_semicontinuous.add LowerSemicontinuous.add
theorem lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_sum {f : ι → α → γ} {a : Finset ι}
(ha : ∀ i ∈ a, LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (f i) s x) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun z => ∑ i ∈ a, f i z) s x := by
classical
induction' a using Finset.induction_on with i a ia IH
· exact lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_const
· simp only [ia, Finset.sum_insert, not_false_iff]
exact
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt.add (ha _ (Finset.mem_insert_self i a))
(IH fun j ja => ha j (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem ja))
#align lower_semicontinuous_within_at_sum lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_sum
| Mathlib/Topology/Semicontinuous.lean | 616 | 620 | theorem lowerSemicontinuousAt_sum {f : ι → α → γ} {a : Finset ι}
(ha : ∀ i ∈ a, LowerSemicontinuousAt (f i) x) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun z => ∑ i ∈ a, f i z) x := by |
simp_rw [← lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff] at *
exact lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_sum ha
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.IsPrimePow
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Basic
#align_import data.nat.factorization.prime_pow from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6ca1a09bc9aa75824bf97388c9e3b441fc4ccf3f"
variable {R : Type*} [CommMonoidWithZero R] (n p : R) (k : ℕ)
theorem IsPrimePow.minFac_pow_factorization_eq {n : ℕ} (hn : IsPrimePow n) :
n.minFac ^ n.factorization n.minFac = n := by
obtain ⟨p, k, hp, hk, rfl⟩ := hn
rw [← Nat.prime_iff] at hp
rw [hp.pow_minFac hk.ne', hp.factorization_pow, Finsupp.single_eq_same]
#align is_prime_pow.min_fac_pow_factorization_eq IsPrimePow.minFac_pow_factorization_eq
theorem isPrimePow_of_minFac_pow_factorization_eq {n : ℕ}
(h : n.minFac ^ n.factorization n.minFac = n) (hn : n ≠ 1) : IsPrimePow n := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn')
· simp_all
refine ⟨_, _, (Nat.minFac_prime hn).prime, ?_, h⟩
simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, ← Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Nat.support_factorization, hn',
Nat.minFac_prime hn, Nat.minFac_dvd]
#align is_prime_pow_of_min_fac_pow_factorization_eq isPrimePow_of_minFac_pow_factorization_eq
theorem isPrimePow_iff_minFac_pow_factorization_eq {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 1) :
IsPrimePow n ↔ n.minFac ^ n.factorization n.minFac = n :=
⟨fun h => h.minFac_pow_factorization_eq, fun h => isPrimePow_of_minFac_pow_factorization_eq h hn⟩
#align is_prime_pow_iff_min_fac_pow_factorization_eq isPrimePow_iff_minFac_pow_factorization_eq
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Factorization/PrimePow.lean | 41 | 54 | theorem isPrimePow_iff_factorization_eq_single {n : ℕ} :
IsPrimePow n ↔ ∃ p k : ℕ, 0 < k ∧ n.factorization = Finsupp.single p k := by |
rw [isPrimePow_nat_iff]
refine exists₂_congr fun p k => ?_
constructor
· rintro ⟨hp, hk, hn⟩
exact ⟨hk, by rw [← hn, Nat.Prime.factorization_pow hp]⟩
· rintro ⟨hk, hn⟩
have hn0 : n ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
simp_all only [Finsupp.single_eq_zero, eq_comm, Nat.factorization_zero, hk.ne']
rw [Nat.eq_pow_of_factorization_eq_single hn0 hn]
exact ⟨Nat.prime_of_mem_primeFactors <|
Finsupp.mem_support_iff.2 (by simp [hn, hk.ne'] : n.factorization p ≠ 0), hk, rfl⟩
|
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Basic
#align_import data.matrix.block from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c060baa79af5ca092c54b8bf04f0f10592f59489"
variable {l m n o p q : Type*} {m' n' p' : o → Type*}
variable {R : Type*} {S : Type*} {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
open Matrix
namespace Matrix
theorem dotProduct_block [Fintype m] [Fintype n] [Mul α] [AddCommMonoid α] (v w : Sum m n → α) :
v ⬝ᵥ w = v ∘ Sum.inl ⬝ᵥ w ∘ Sum.inl + v ∘ Sum.inr ⬝ᵥ w ∘ Sum.inr :=
Fintype.sum_sum_type _
#align matrix.dot_product_block Matrix.dotProduct_block
section BlockMatrices
-- @[pp_nodot] -- Porting note: removed
def fromBlocks (A : Matrix n l α) (B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α) (D : Matrix o m α) :
Matrix (Sum n o) (Sum l m) α :=
of <| Sum.elim (fun i => Sum.elim (A i) (B i)) fun i => Sum.elim (C i) (D i)
#align matrix.from_blocks Matrix.fromBlocks
@[simp]
theorem fromBlocks_apply₁₁ (A : Matrix n l α) (B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α)
(D : Matrix o m α) (i : n) (j : l) : fromBlocks A B C D (Sum.inl i) (Sum.inl j) = A i j :=
rfl
#align matrix.from_blocks_apply₁₁ Matrix.fromBlocks_apply₁₁
@[simp]
theorem fromBlocks_apply₁₂ (A : Matrix n l α) (B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α)
(D : Matrix o m α) (i : n) (j : m) : fromBlocks A B C D (Sum.inl i) (Sum.inr j) = B i j :=
rfl
#align matrix.from_blocks_apply₁₂ Matrix.fromBlocks_apply₁₂
@[simp]
theorem fromBlocks_apply₂₁ (A : Matrix n l α) (B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α)
(D : Matrix o m α) (i : o) (j : l) : fromBlocks A B C D (Sum.inr i) (Sum.inl j) = C i j :=
rfl
#align matrix.from_blocks_apply₂₁ Matrix.fromBlocks_apply₂₁
@[simp]
theorem fromBlocks_apply₂₂ (A : Matrix n l α) (B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α)
(D : Matrix o m α) (i : o) (j : m) : fromBlocks A B C D (Sum.inr i) (Sum.inr j) = D i j :=
rfl
#align matrix.from_blocks_apply₂₂ Matrix.fromBlocks_apply₂₂
def toBlocks₁₁ (M : Matrix (Sum n o) (Sum l m) α) : Matrix n l α :=
of fun i j => M (Sum.inl i) (Sum.inl j)
#align matrix.to_blocks₁₁ Matrix.toBlocks₁₁
def toBlocks₁₂ (M : Matrix (Sum n o) (Sum l m) α) : Matrix n m α :=
of fun i j => M (Sum.inl i) (Sum.inr j)
#align matrix.to_blocks₁₂ Matrix.toBlocks₁₂
def toBlocks₂₁ (M : Matrix (Sum n o) (Sum l m) α) : Matrix o l α :=
of fun i j => M (Sum.inr i) (Sum.inl j)
#align matrix.to_blocks₂₁ Matrix.toBlocks₂₁
def toBlocks₂₂ (M : Matrix (Sum n o) (Sum l m) α) : Matrix o m α :=
of fun i j => M (Sum.inr i) (Sum.inr j)
#align matrix.to_blocks₂₂ Matrix.toBlocks₂₂
theorem fromBlocks_toBlocks (M : Matrix (Sum n o) (Sum l m) α) :
fromBlocks M.toBlocks₁₁ M.toBlocks₁₂ M.toBlocks₂₁ M.toBlocks₂₂ = M := by
ext i j
rcases i with ⟨⟩ <;> rcases j with ⟨⟩ <;> rfl
#align matrix.from_blocks_to_blocks Matrix.fromBlocks_toBlocks
@[simp]
theorem toBlocks_fromBlocks₁₁ (A : Matrix n l α) (B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α)
(D : Matrix o m α) : (fromBlocks A B C D).toBlocks₁₁ = A :=
rfl
#align matrix.to_blocks_from_blocks₁₁ Matrix.toBlocks_fromBlocks₁₁
@[simp]
theorem toBlocks_fromBlocks₁₂ (A : Matrix n l α) (B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α)
(D : Matrix o m α) : (fromBlocks A B C D).toBlocks₁₂ = B :=
rfl
#align matrix.to_blocks_from_blocks₁₂ Matrix.toBlocks_fromBlocks₁₂
@[simp]
theorem toBlocks_fromBlocks₂₁ (A : Matrix n l α) (B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α)
(D : Matrix o m α) : (fromBlocks A B C D).toBlocks₂₁ = C :=
rfl
#align matrix.to_blocks_from_blocks₂₁ Matrix.toBlocks_fromBlocks₂₁
@[simp]
theorem toBlocks_fromBlocks₂₂ (A : Matrix n l α) (B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α)
(D : Matrix o m α) : (fromBlocks A B C D).toBlocks₂₂ = D :=
rfl
#align matrix.to_blocks_from_blocks₂₂ Matrix.toBlocks_fromBlocks₂₂
theorem ext_iff_blocks {A B : Matrix (Sum n o) (Sum l m) α} :
A = B ↔
A.toBlocks₁₁ = B.toBlocks₁₁ ∧
A.toBlocks₁₂ = B.toBlocks₁₂ ∧ A.toBlocks₂₁ = B.toBlocks₂₁ ∧ A.toBlocks₂₂ = B.toBlocks₂₂ :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl, rfl⟩, fun ⟨h₁₁, h₁₂, h₂₁, h₂₂⟩ => by
rw [← fromBlocks_toBlocks A, ← fromBlocks_toBlocks B, h₁₁, h₁₂, h₂₁, h₂₂]⟩
#align matrix.ext_iff_blocks Matrix.ext_iff_blocks
@[simp]
theorem fromBlocks_inj {A : Matrix n l α} {B : Matrix n m α} {C : Matrix o l α} {D : Matrix o m α}
{A' : Matrix n l α} {B' : Matrix n m α} {C' : Matrix o l α} {D' : Matrix o m α} :
fromBlocks A B C D = fromBlocks A' B' C' D' ↔ A = A' ∧ B = B' ∧ C = C' ∧ D = D' :=
ext_iff_blocks
#align matrix.from_blocks_inj Matrix.fromBlocks_inj
theorem fromBlocks_map (A : Matrix n l α) (B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α) (D : Matrix o m α)
(f : α → β) : (fromBlocks A B C D).map f =
fromBlocks (A.map f) (B.map f) (C.map f) (D.map f) := by
ext i j; rcases i with ⟨⟩ <;> rcases j with ⟨⟩ <;> simp [fromBlocks]
#align matrix.from_blocks_map Matrix.fromBlocks_map
theorem fromBlocks_transpose (A : Matrix n l α) (B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α)
(D : Matrix o m α) : (fromBlocks A B C D)ᵀ = fromBlocks Aᵀ Cᵀ Bᵀ Dᵀ := by
ext i j
rcases i with ⟨⟩ <;> rcases j with ⟨⟩ <;> simp [fromBlocks]
#align matrix.from_blocks_transpose Matrix.fromBlocks_transpose
theorem fromBlocks_conjTranspose [Star α] (A : Matrix n l α) (B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α)
(D : Matrix o m α) : (fromBlocks A B C D)ᴴ = fromBlocks Aᴴ Cᴴ Bᴴ Dᴴ := by
simp only [conjTranspose, fromBlocks_transpose, fromBlocks_map]
#align matrix.from_blocks_conj_transpose Matrix.fromBlocks_conjTranspose
@[simp]
theorem fromBlocks_submatrix_sum_swap_left (A : Matrix n l α) (B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α)
(D : Matrix o m α) (f : p → Sum l m) :
(fromBlocks A B C D).submatrix Sum.swap f = (fromBlocks C D A B).submatrix id f := by
ext i j
cases i <;> dsimp <;> cases f j <;> rfl
#align matrix.from_blocks_submatrix_sum_swap_left Matrix.fromBlocks_submatrix_sum_swap_left
@[simp]
theorem fromBlocks_submatrix_sum_swap_right (A : Matrix n l α) (B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α)
(D : Matrix o m α) (f : p → Sum n o) :
(fromBlocks A B C D).submatrix f Sum.swap = (fromBlocks B A D C).submatrix f id := by
ext i j
cases j <;> dsimp <;> cases f i <;> rfl
#align matrix.from_blocks_submatrix_sum_swap_right Matrix.fromBlocks_submatrix_sum_swap_right
theorem fromBlocks_submatrix_sum_swap_sum_swap {l m n o α : Type*} (A : Matrix n l α)
(B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α) (D : Matrix o m α) :
(fromBlocks A B C D).submatrix Sum.swap Sum.swap = fromBlocks D C B A := by simp
#align matrix.from_blocks_submatrix_sum_swap_sum_swap Matrix.fromBlocks_submatrix_sum_swap_sum_swap
def IsTwoBlockDiagonal [Zero α] (A : Matrix (Sum n o) (Sum l m) α) : Prop :=
toBlocks₁₂ A = 0 ∧ toBlocks₂₁ A = 0
#align matrix.is_two_block_diagonal Matrix.IsTwoBlockDiagonal
def toBlock (M : Matrix m n α) (p : m → Prop) (q : n → Prop) : Matrix { a // p a } { a // q a } α :=
M.submatrix (↑) (↑)
#align matrix.to_block Matrix.toBlock
@[simp]
theorem toBlock_apply (M : Matrix m n α) (p : m → Prop) (q : n → Prop) (i : { a // p a })
(j : { a // q a }) : toBlock M p q i j = M ↑i ↑j :=
rfl
#align matrix.to_block_apply Matrix.toBlock_apply
def toSquareBlockProp (M : Matrix m m α) (p : m → Prop) : Matrix { a // p a } { a // p a } α :=
toBlock M _ _
#align matrix.to_square_block_prop Matrix.toSquareBlockProp
theorem toSquareBlockProp_def (M : Matrix m m α) (p : m → Prop) :
-- Porting note: added missing `of`
toSquareBlockProp M p = of (fun i j : { a // p a } => M ↑i ↑j) :=
rfl
#align matrix.to_square_block_prop_def Matrix.toSquareBlockProp_def
def toSquareBlock (M : Matrix m m α) (b : m → β) (k : β) :
Matrix { a // b a = k } { a // b a = k } α :=
toSquareBlockProp M _
#align matrix.to_square_block Matrix.toSquareBlock
theorem toSquareBlock_def (M : Matrix m m α) (b : m → β) (k : β) :
-- Porting note: added missing `of`
toSquareBlock M b k = of (fun i j : { a // b a = k } => M ↑i ↑j) :=
rfl
#align matrix.to_square_block_def Matrix.toSquareBlock_def
theorem fromBlocks_smul [SMul R α] (x : R) (A : Matrix n l α) (B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α)
(D : Matrix o m α) : x • fromBlocks A B C D = fromBlocks (x • A) (x • B) (x • C) (x • D) := by
ext i j; rcases i with ⟨⟩ <;> rcases j with ⟨⟩ <;> simp [fromBlocks]
#align matrix.from_blocks_smul Matrix.fromBlocks_smul
theorem fromBlocks_neg [Neg R] (A : Matrix n l R) (B : Matrix n m R) (C : Matrix o l R)
(D : Matrix o m R) : -fromBlocks A B C D = fromBlocks (-A) (-B) (-C) (-D) := by
ext i j
cases i <;> cases j <;> simp [fromBlocks]
#align matrix.from_blocks_neg Matrix.fromBlocks_neg
@[simp]
theorem fromBlocks_zero [Zero α] : fromBlocks (0 : Matrix n l α) 0 0 (0 : Matrix o m α) = 0 := by
ext i j
rcases i with ⟨⟩ <;> rcases j with ⟨⟩ <;> rfl
#align matrix.from_blocks_zero Matrix.fromBlocks_zero
theorem fromBlocks_add [Add α] (A : Matrix n l α) (B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α)
(D : Matrix o m α) (A' : Matrix n l α) (B' : Matrix n m α) (C' : Matrix o l α)
(D' : Matrix o m α) : fromBlocks A B C D + fromBlocks A' B' C' D' =
fromBlocks (A + A') (B + B') (C + C') (D + D') := by
ext i j; rcases i with ⟨⟩ <;> rcases j with ⟨⟩ <;> rfl
#align matrix.from_blocks_add Matrix.fromBlocks_add
theorem fromBlocks_multiply [Fintype l] [Fintype m] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] (A : Matrix n l α)
(B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α) (D : Matrix o m α) (A' : Matrix l p α) (B' : Matrix l q α)
(C' : Matrix m p α) (D' : Matrix m q α) :
fromBlocks A B C D * fromBlocks A' B' C' D' =
fromBlocks (A * A' + B * C') (A * B' + B * D') (C * A' + D * C') (C * B' + D * D') := by
ext i j
rcases i with ⟨⟩ <;> rcases j with ⟨⟩ <;> simp only [fromBlocks, mul_apply, of_apply,
Sum.elim_inr, Fintype.sum_sum_type, Sum.elim_inl, add_apply]
#align matrix.from_blocks_multiply Matrix.fromBlocks_multiply
theorem fromBlocks_mulVec [Fintype l] [Fintype m] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] (A : Matrix n l α)
(B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α) (D : Matrix o m α) (x : Sum l m → α) :
(fromBlocks A B C D) *ᵥ x =
Sum.elim (A *ᵥ (x ∘ Sum.inl) + B *ᵥ (x ∘ Sum.inr))
(C *ᵥ (x ∘ Sum.inl) + D *ᵥ (x ∘ Sum.inr)) := by
ext i
cases i <;> simp [mulVec, dotProduct]
#align matrix.from_blocks_mul_vec Matrix.fromBlocks_mulVec
theorem vecMul_fromBlocks [Fintype n] [Fintype o] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] (A : Matrix n l α)
(B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α) (D : Matrix o m α) (x : Sum n o → α) :
x ᵥ* fromBlocks A B C D =
Sum.elim ((x ∘ Sum.inl) ᵥ* A + (x ∘ Sum.inr) ᵥ* C)
((x ∘ Sum.inl) ᵥ* B + (x ∘ Sum.inr) ᵥ* D) := by
ext i
cases i <;> simp [vecMul, dotProduct]
#align matrix.vec_mul_from_blocks Matrix.vecMul_fromBlocks
variable [DecidableEq l] [DecidableEq m]
section Zero
variable [Zero α]
theorem toBlock_diagonal_self (d : m → α) (p : m → Prop) :
Matrix.toBlock (diagonal d) p p = diagonal fun i : Subtype p => d ↑i := by
ext i j
by_cases h : i = j
· simp [h]
· simp [One.one, h, Subtype.val_injective.ne h]
#align matrix.to_block_diagonal_self Matrix.toBlock_diagonal_self
theorem toBlock_diagonal_disjoint (d : m → α) {p q : m → Prop} (hpq : Disjoint p q) :
Matrix.toBlock (diagonal d) p q = 0 := by
ext ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩
have : i ≠ j := fun heq => hpq.le_bot i ⟨hi, heq.symm ▸ hj⟩
simp [diagonal_apply_ne d this]
#align matrix.to_block_diagonal_disjoint Matrix.toBlock_diagonal_disjoint
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/Block.lean | 297 | 300 | theorem fromBlocks_diagonal (d₁ : l → α) (d₂ : m → α) :
fromBlocks (diagonal d₁) 0 0 (diagonal d₂) = diagonal (Sum.elim d₁ d₂) := by |
ext i j
rcases i with ⟨⟩ <;> rcases j with ⟨⟩ <;> simp [diagonal]
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.Hom
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.ULift
#align_import category_theory.yoneda from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"369525b73f229ccd76a6ec0e0e0bf2be57599768"
namespace CategoryTheory
open Opposite
universe v₁ u₁ u₂
-- morphism levels before object levels. See note [CategoryTheory universes].
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
@[simps]
def yoneda : C ⥤ Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁ where
obj X :=
{ obj := fun Y => unop Y ⟶ X
map := fun f g => f.unop ≫ g }
map f :=
{ app := fun Y g => g ≫ f }
#align category_theory.yoneda CategoryTheory.yoneda
@[simps]
def coyoneda : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ C ⥤ Type v₁ where
obj X :=
{ obj := fun Y => unop X ⟶ Y
map := fun f g => g ≫ f }
map f :=
{ app := fun Y g => f.unop ≫ g }
#align category_theory.coyoneda CategoryTheory.coyoneda
namespace Yoneda
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Yoneda.lean | 59 | 62 | theorem obj_map_id {X Y : C} (f : op X ⟶ op Y) :
(yoneda.obj X).map f (𝟙 X) = (yoneda.map f.unop).app (op Y) (𝟙 Y) := by |
dsimp
simp
|
import Mathlib.Data.List.Count
import Mathlib.Data.List.Dedup
import Mathlib.Data.List.InsertNth
import Mathlib.Data.List.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.List.Permutation
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorial.Basic
#align_import data.list.perm from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83"
-- Make sure we don't import algebra
assert_not_exists Monoid
open Nat
namespace List
variable {α β : Type*} {l l₁ l₂ : List α} {a : α}
#align list.perm List.Perm
instance : Trans (@List.Perm α) (@List.Perm α) List.Perm where
trans := @List.Perm.trans α
open Perm (swap)
attribute [refl] Perm.refl
#align list.perm.refl List.Perm.refl
lemma perm_rfl : l ~ l := Perm.refl _
-- Porting note: used rec_on in mathlib3; lean4 eqn compiler still doesn't like it
attribute [symm] Perm.symm
#align list.perm.symm List.Perm.symm
#align list.perm_comm List.perm_comm
#align list.perm.swap' List.Perm.swap'
attribute [trans] Perm.trans
#align list.perm.eqv List.Perm.eqv
#align list.is_setoid List.isSetoid
#align list.perm.mem_iff List.Perm.mem_iff
#align list.perm.subset List.Perm.subset
theorem Perm.subset_congr_left {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α} (h : l₁ ~ l₂) : l₁ ⊆ l₃ ↔ l₂ ⊆ l₃ :=
⟨h.symm.subset.trans, h.subset.trans⟩
#align list.perm.subset_congr_left List.Perm.subset_congr_left
theorem Perm.subset_congr_right {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α} (h : l₁ ~ l₂) : l₃ ⊆ l₁ ↔ l₃ ⊆ l₂ :=
⟨fun h' => h'.trans h.subset, fun h' => h'.trans h.symm.subset⟩
#align list.perm.subset_congr_right List.Perm.subset_congr_right
#align list.perm.append_right List.Perm.append_right
#align list.perm.append_left List.Perm.append_left
#align list.perm.append List.Perm.append
#align list.perm.append_cons List.Perm.append_cons
#align list.perm_middle List.perm_middle
#align list.perm_append_singleton List.perm_append_singleton
#align list.perm_append_comm List.perm_append_comm
#align list.concat_perm List.concat_perm
#align list.perm.length_eq List.Perm.length_eq
#align list.perm.eq_nil List.Perm.eq_nil
#align list.perm.nil_eq List.Perm.nil_eq
#align list.perm_nil List.perm_nil
#align list.nil_perm List.nil_perm
#align list.not_perm_nil_cons List.not_perm_nil_cons
#align list.reverse_perm List.reverse_perm
#align list.perm_cons_append_cons List.perm_cons_append_cons
#align list.perm_replicate List.perm_replicate
#align list.replicate_perm List.replicate_perm
#align list.perm_singleton List.perm_singleton
#align list.singleton_perm List.singleton_perm
#align list.singleton_perm_singleton List.singleton_perm_singleton
#align list.perm_cons_erase List.perm_cons_erase
#align list.perm_induction_on List.Perm.recOnSwap'
-- Porting note: used to be @[congr]
#align list.perm.filter_map List.Perm.filterMap
-- Porting note: used to be @[congr]
#align list.perm.map List.Perm.map
#align list.perm.pmap List.Perm.pmap
#align list.perm.filter List.Perm.filter
#align list.filter_append_perm List.filter_append_perm
#align list.exists_perm_sublist List.exists_perm_sublist
#align list.perm.sizeof_eq_sizeof List.Perm.sizeOf_eq_sizeOf
#align list.sublist.exists_perm_append List.Sublist.exists_perm_append
lemma subperm_iff : l₁ <+~ l₂ ↔ ∃ l, l ~ l₂ ∧ l₁ <+ l := by
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨l, h₁, h₂⟩ ↦ h₂.subperm.trans h₁.subperm⟩
rintro ⟨l, h₁, h₂⟩
obtain ⟨l', h₂⟩ := h₂.exists_perm_append
exact ⟨l₁ ++ l', (h₂.trans (h₁.append_right _)).symm, (prefix_append _ _).sublist⟩
#align list.subperm_singleton_iff List.singleton_subperm_iff
@[simp] lemma subperm_singleton_iff : l <+~ [a] ↔ l = [] ∨ l = [a] := by
constructor
· rw [subperm_iff]
rintro ⟨s, hla, h⟩
rwa [perm_singleton.mp hla, sublist_singleton] at h
· rintro (rfl | rfl)
exacts [nil_subperm, Subperm.refl _]
attribute [simp] nil_subperm
@[simp]
theorem subperm_nil : List.Subperm l [] ↔ l = [] :=
match l with
| [] => by simp
| head :: tail => by
simp only [iff_false]
intro h
have := h.length_le
simp only [List.length_cons, List.length_nil, Nat.succ_ne_zero, ← Nat.not_lt, Nat.zero_lt_succ,
not_true_eq_false] at this
#align list.perm.countp_eq List.Perm.countP_eq
#align list.subperm.countp_le List.Subperm.countP_le
#align list.perm.countp_congr List.Perm.countP_congr
#align list.countp_eq_countp_filter_add List.countP_eq_countP_filter_add
lemma count_eq_count_filter_add [DecidableEq α] (P : α → Prop) [DecidablePred P]
(l : List α) (a : α) :
count a l = count a (l.filter P) + count a (l.filter (¬ P ·)) := by
convert countP_eq_countP_filter_add l _ P
simp only [decide_not]
#align list.perm.count_eq List.Perm.count_eq
#align list.subperm.count_le List.Subperm.count_le
#align list.perm.foldl_eq' List.Perm.foldl_eq'
theorem Perm.foldl_eq {f : β → α → β} {l₁ l₂ : List α} (rcomm : RightCommutative f) (p : l₁ ~ l₂) :
∀ b, foldl f b l₁ = foldl f b l₂ :=
p.foldl_eq' fun x _hx y _hy z => rcomm z x y
#align list.perm.foldl_eq List.Perm.foldl_eq
theorem Perm.foldr_eq {f : α → β → β} {l₁ l₂ : List α} (lcomm : LeftCommutative f) (p : l₁ ~ l₂) :
∀ b, foldr f b l₁ = foldr f b l₂ := by
intro b
induction p using Perm.recOnSwap' generalizing b with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ r => simp; rw [r b]
| swap' _ _ _ r => simp; rw [lcomm, r b]
| trans _ _ r₁ r₂ => exact Eq.trans (r₁ b) (r₂ b)
#align list.perm.foldr_eq List.Perm.foldr_eq
#align list.perm.rec_heq List.Perm.rec_heq
section
variable {op : α → α → α} [IA : Std.Associative op] [IC : Std.Commutative op]
local notation a " * " b => op a b
local notation l " <*> " a => foldl op a l
theorem Perm.fold_op_eq {l₁ l₂ : List α} {a : α} (h : l₁ ~ l₂) : (l₁ <*> a) = l₂ <*> a :=
h.foldl_eq (right_comm _ IC.comm IA.assoc) _
#align list.perm.fold_op_eq List.Perm.fold_op_eq
end
#align list.perm_inv_core List.perm_inv_core
#align list.perm.cons_inv List.Perm.cons_inv
#align list.perm_cons List.perm_cons
#align list.perm_append_left_iff List.perm_append_left_iff
#align list.perm_append_right_iff List.perm_append_right_iff
theorem perm_option_to_list {o₁ o₂ : Option α} : o₁.toList ~ o₂.toList ↔ o₁ = o₂ := by
refine ⟨fun p => ?_, fun e => e ▸ Perm.refl _⟩
cases' o₁ with a <;> cases' o₂ with b; · rfl
· cases p.length_eq
· cases p.length_eq
· exact Option.mem_toList.1 (p.symm.subset <| by simp)
#align list.perm_option_to_list List.perm_option_to_list
#align list.subperm_cons List.subperm_cons
alias ⟨subperm.of_cons, subperm.cons⟩ := subperm_cons
#align list.subperm.of_cons List.subperm.of_cons
#align list.subperm.cons List.subperm.cons
-- Porting note: commented out
--attribute [protected] subperm.cons
theorem cons_subperm_of_mem {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : List α} (d₁ : Nodup l₁) (h₁ : a ∉ l₁) (h₂ : a ∈ l₂)
(s : l₁ <+~ l₂) : a :: l₁ <+~ l₂ := by
rcases s with ⟨l, p, s⟩
induction s generalizing l₁ with
| slnil => cases h₂
| @cons r₁ r₂ b s' ih =>
simp? at h₂ says simp only [mem_cons] at h₂
cases' h₂ with e m
· subst b
exact ⟨a :: r₁, p.cons a, s'.cons₂ _⟩
· rcases ih d₁ h₁ m p with ⟨t, p', s'⟩
exact ⟨t, p', s'.cons _⟩
| @cons₂ r₁ r₂ b _ ih =>
have bm : b ∈ l₁ := p.subset <| mem_cons_self _ _
have am : a ∈ r₂ := by
simp only [find?, mem_cons] at h₂
exact h₂.resolve_left fun e => h₁ <| e.symm ▸ bm
rcases append_of_mem bm with ⟨t₁, t₂, rfl⟩
have st : t₁ ++ t₂ <+ t₁ ++ b :: t₂ := by simp
rcases ih (d₁.sublist st) (mt (fun x => st.subset x) h₁) am
(Perm.cons_inv <| p.trans perm_middle) with
⟨t, p', s'⟩
exact
⟨b :: t, (p'.cons b).trans <| (swap _ _ _).trans (perm_middle.symm.cons a), s'.cons₂ _⟩
#align list.cons_subperm_of_mem List.cons_subperm_of_mem
#align list.subperm_append_left List.subperm_append_left
#align list.subperm_append_right List.subperm_append_right
#align list.subperm.exists_of_length_lt List.Subperm.exists_of_length_lt
protected theorem Nodup.subperm (d : Nodup l₁) (H : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : l₁ <+~ l₂ :=
subperm_of_subset d H
#align list.nodup.subperm List.Nodup.subperm
#align list.perm_ext List.perm_ext_iff_of_nodup
#align list.nodup.sublist_ext List.Nodup.perm_iff_eq_of_sublist
section
variable [DecidableEq α]
-- attribute [congr]
#align list.perm.erase List.Perm.erase
#align list.subperm_cons_erase List.subperm_cons_erase
#align list.erase_subperm List.erase_subperm
#align list.subperm.erase List.Subperm.erase
#align list.perm.diff_right List.Perm.diff_right
#align list.perm.diff_left List.Perm.diff_left
#align list.perm.diff List.Perm.diff
#align list.subperm.diff_right List.Subperm.diff_right
#align list.erase_cons_subperm_cons_erase List.erase_cons_subperm_cons_erase
#align list.subperm_cons_diff List.subperm_cons_diff
#align list.subset_cons_diff List.subset_cons_diff
theorem Perm.bagInter_right {l₁ l₂ : List α} (t : List α) (h : l₁ ~ l₂) :
l₁.bagInter t ~ l₂.bagInter t := by
induction' h with x _ _ _ _ x y _ _ _ _ _ _ ih_1 ih_2 generalizing t; · simp
· by_cases x ∈ t <;> simp [*, Perm.cons]
· by_cases h : x = y
· simp [h]
by_cases xt : x ∈ t <;> by_cases yt : y ∈ t
· simp [xt, yt, mem_erase_of_ne h, mem_erase_of_ne (Ne.symm h), erase_comm, swap]
· simp [xt, yt, mt mem_of_mem_erase, Perm.cons]
· simp [xt, yt, mt mem_of_mem_erase, Perm.cons]
· simp [xt, yt]
· exact (ih_1 _).trans (ih_2 _)
#align list.perm.bag_inter_right List.Perm.bagInter_right
theorem Perm.bagInter_left (l : List α) {t₁ t₂ : List α} (p : t₁ ~ t₂) :
l.bagInter t₁ = l.bagInter t₂ := by
induction' l with a l IH generalizing t₁ t₂ p; · simp
by_cases h : a ∈ t₁
· simp [h, p.subset h, IH (p.erase _)]
· simp [h, mt p.mem_iff.2 h, IH p]
#align list.perm.bag_inter_left List.Perm.bagInter_left
theorem Perm.bagInter {l₁ l₂ t₁ t₂ : List α} (hl : l₁ ~ l₂) (ht : t₁ ~ t₂) :
l₁.bagInter t₁ ~ l₂.bagInter t₂ :=
ht.bagInter_left l₂ ▸ hl.bagInter_right _
#align list.perm.bag_inter List.Perm.bagInter
#align list.cons_perm_iff_perm_erase List.cons_perm_iff_perm_erase
#align list.perm_iff_count List.perm_iff_count
theorem perm_replicate_append_replicate {l : List α} {a b : α} {m n : ℕ} (h : a ≠ b) :
l ~ replicate m a ++ replicate n b ↔ count a l = m ∧ count b l = n ∧ l ⊆ [a, b] := by
rw [perm_iff_count, ← Decidable.and_forall_ne a, ← Decidable.and_forall_ne b]
suffices l ⊆ [a, b] ↔ ∀ c, c ≠ b → c ≠ a → c ∉ l by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [count_replicate, h, h.symm, this, count_eq_zero]
trans ∀ c, c ∈ l → c = b ∨ c = a
· simp [subset_def, or_comm]
· exact forall_congr' fun _ => by rw [← and_imp, ← not_or, not_imp_not]
#align list.perm_replicate_append_replicate List.perm_replicate_append_replicate
#align list.subperm.cons_right List.Subperm.cons_right
#align list.subperm_append_diff_self_of_count_le List.subperm_append_diff_self_of_count_le
#align list.subperm_ext_iff List.subperm_ext_iff
#align list.decidable_subperm List.decidableSubperm
#align list.subperm.cons_left List.Subperm.cons_left
#align list.decidable_perm List.decidablePerm
-- @[congr]
theorem Perm.dedup {l₁ l₂ : List α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) : dedup l₁ ~ dedup l₂ :=
perm_iff_count.2 fun a =>
if h : a ∈ l₁ then by simp [nodup_dedup, h, p.subset h] else by simp [h, mt p.mem_iff.2 h]
#align list.perm.dedup List.Perm.dedup
-- attribute [congr]
#align list.perm.insert List.Perm.insert
#align list.perm_insert_swap List.perm_insert_swap
#align list.perm_insert_nth List.perm_insertNth
#align list.perm.union_right List.Perm.union_right
#align list.perm.union_left List.Perm.union_left
-- @[congr]
#align list.perm.union List.Perm.union
#align list.perm.inter_right List.Perm.inter_right
#align list.perm.inter_left List.Perm.inter_left
-- @[congr]
#align list.perm.inter List.Perm.inter
theorem Perm.inter_append {l t₁ t₂ : List α} (h : Disjoint t₁ t₂) :
l ∩ (t₁ ++ t₂) ~ l ∩ t₁ ++ l ∩ t₂ := by
induction l with
| nil => simp
| cons x xs l_ih =>
by_cases h₁ : x ∈ t₁
· have h₂ : x ∉ t₂ := h h₁
simp [*]
by_cases h₂ : x ∈ t₂
· simp only [*, inter_cons_of_not_mem, false_or_iff, mem_append, inter_cons_of_mem,
not_false_iff]
refine Perm.trans (Perm.cons _ l_ih) ?_
change [x] ++ xs ∩ t₁ ++ xs ∩ t₂ ~ xs ∩ t₁ ++ ([x] ++ xs ∩ t₂)
rw [← List.append_assoc]
solve_by_elim [Perm.append_right, perm_append_comm]
· simp [*]
#align list.perm.inter_append List.Perm.inter_append
end
#align list.perm.pairwise_iff List.Perm.pairwise_iff
#align list.pairwise.perm List.Pairwise.perm
#align list.perm.pairwise List.Perm.pairwise
#align list.perm.nodup_iff List.Perm.nodup_iff
#align list.perm.join List.Perm.join
#align list.perm.bind_right List.Perm.bind_right
#align list.perm.join_congr List.Perm.join_congr
theorem Perm.bind_left (l : List α) {f g : α → List β} (h : ∀ a ∈ l, f a ~ g a) :
l.bind f ~ l.bind g :=
Perm.join_congr <| by
rwa [List.forall₂_map_right_iff, List.forall₂_map_left_iff, List.forall₂_same]
#align list.perm.bind_left List.Perm.bind_left
theorem bind_append_perm (l : List α) (f g : α → List β) :
l.bind f ++ l.bind g ~ l.bind fun x => f x ++ g x := by
induction' l with a l IH <;> simp
refine (Perm.trans ?_ (IH.append_left _)).append_left _
rw [← append_assoc, ← append_assoc]
exact perm_append_comm.append_right _
#align list.bind_append_perm List.bind_append_perm
theorem map_append_bind_perm (l : List α) (f : α → β) (g : α → List β) :
l.map f ++ l.bind g ~ l.bind fun x => f x :: g x := by
simpa [← map_eq_bind] using bind_append_perm l (fun x => [f x]) g
#align list.map_append_bind_perm List.map_append_bind_perm
theorem Perm.product_right {l₁ l₂ : List α} (t₁ : List β) (p : l₁ ~ l₂) :
product l₁ t₁ ~ product l₂ t₁ :=
p.bind_right _
#align list.perm.product_right List.Perm.product_right
theorem Perm.product_left (l : List α) {t₁ t₂ : List β} (p : t₁ ~ t₂) :
product l t₁ ~ product l t₂ :=
(Perm.bind_left _) fun _ _ => p.map _
#align list.perm.product_left List.Perm.product_left
-- @[congr]
theorem Perm.product {l₁ l₂ : List α} {t₁ t₂ : List β} (p₁ : l₁ ~ l₂) (p₂ : t₁ ~ t₂) :
product l₁ t₁ ~ product l₂ t₂ :=
(p₁.product_right t₁).trans (p₂.product_left l₂)
#align list.perm.product List.Perm.product
theorem perm_lookmap (f : α → Option α) {l₁ l₂ : List α}
(H : Pairwise (fun a b => ∀ c ∈ f a, ∀ d ∈ f b, a = b ∧ c = d) l₁) (p : l₁ ~ l₂) :
lookmap f l₁ ~ lookmap f l₂ := by
induction' p with a l₁ l₂ p IH a b l l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ _ IH₁ IH₂; · simp
· cases h : f a
· simp [h]
exact IH (pairwise_cons.1 H).2
· simp [lookmap_cons_some _ _ h, p]
· cases' h₁ : f a with c <;> cases' h₂ : f b with d
· simp [h₁, h₂]
apply swap
· simp [h₁, lookmap_cons_some _ _ h₂]
apply swap
· simp [lookmap_cons_some _ _ h₁, h₂]
apply swap
· simp [lookmap_cons_some _ _ h₁, lookmap_cons_some _ _ h₂]
rcases (pairwise_cons.1 H).1 _ (mem_cons.2 (Or.inl rfl)) _ h₂ _ h₁ with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact Perm.refl _
· refine (IH₁ H).trans (IH₂ ((p₁.pairwise_iff ?_).1 H))
intro x y h c hc d hd
rw [@eq_comm _ y, @eq_comm _ c]
apply h d hd c hc
#align list.perm_lookmap List.perm_lookmap
#align list.perm.erasep List.Perm.eraseP
theorem Perm.take_inter [DecidableEq α] {xs ys : List α} (n : ℕ) (h : xs ~ ys)
(h' : ys.Nodup) : xs.take n ~ ys.inter (xs.take n) := by
simp only [List.inter]
exact Perm.trans (show xs.take n ~ xs.filter (xs.take n).elem by
conv_lhs => rw [Nodup.take_eq_filter_mem ((Perm.nodup_iff h).2 h')])
(Perm.filter _ h)
#align list.perm.take_inter List.Perm.take_inter
theorem Perm.drop_inter [DecidableEq α] {xs ys : List α} (n : ℕ) (h : xs ~ ys) (h' : ys.Nodup) :
xs.drop n ~ ys.inter (xs.drop n) := by
by_cases h'' : n ≤ xs.length
· let n' := xs.length - n
have h₀ : n = xs.length - n' := by rwa [Nat.sub_sub_self]
have h₁ : n' ≤ xs.length := Nat.sub_le ..
have h₂ : xs.drop n = (xs.reverse.take n').reverse := by
rw [reverse_take _ h₁, h₀, reverse_reverse]
rw [h₂]
apply (reverse_perm _).trans
rw [inter_reverse]
apply Perm.take_inter _ _ h'
apply (reverse_perm _).trans; assumption
· have : drop n xs = [] := by
apply eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero
rw [length_drop, Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le]
apply le_of_not_ge h''
simp [this, List.inter]
#align list.perm.drop_inter List.Perm.drop_inter
theorem Perm.dropSlice_inter [DecidableEq α] {xs ys : List α} (n m : ℕ) (h : xs ~ ys)
(h' : ys.Nodup) : List.dropSlice n m xs ~ ys ∩ List.dropSlice n m xs := by
simp only [dropSlice_eq]
have : n ≤ n + m := Nat.le_add_right _ _
have h₂ := h.nodup_iff.2 h'
apply Perm.trans _ (Perm.inter_append _).symm
· exact Perm.append (Perm.take_inter _ h h') (Perm.drop_inter _ h h')
· exact disjoint_take_drop h₂ this
#align list.perm.slice_inter List.Perm.dropSlice_inter
-- enumerating permutations
section Permutations
theorem perm_of_mem_permutationsAux :
∀ {ts is l : List α}, l ∈ permutationsAux ts is → l ~ ts ++ is := by
show ∀ (ts is l : List α), l ∈ permutationsAux ts is → l ~ ts ++ is
refine permutationsAux.rec (by simp) ?_
introv IH1 IH2 m
rw [permutationsAux_cons, permutations, mem_foldr_permutationsAux2] at m
rcases m with (m | ⟨l₁, l₂, m, _, rfl⟩)
· exact (IH1 _ m).trans perm_middle
· have p : l₁ ++ l₂ ~ is := by
simp only [mem_cons] at m
cases' m with e m
· simp [e]
exact is.append_nil ▸ IH2 _ m
exact ((perm_middle.trans (p.cons _)).append_right _).trans (perm_append_comm.cons _)
#align list.perm_of_mem_permutations_aux List.perm_of_mem_permutationsAux
theorem perm_of_mem_permutations {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h : l₁ ∈ permutations l₂) : l₁ ~ l₂ :=
(eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h).elim (fun e => e ▸ Perm.refl _) fun m =>
append_nil l₂ ▸ perm_of_mem_permutationsAux m
#align list.perm_of_mem_permutations List.perm_of_mem_permutations
theorem length_permutationsAux :
∀ ts is : List α, length (permutationsAux ts is) + is.length ! = (length ts + length is)! := by
refine permutationsAux.rec (by simp) ?_
intro t ts is IH1 IH2
have IH2 : length (permutationsAux is nil) + 1 = is.length ! := by simpa using IH2
simp only [factorial, Nat.mul_comm, add_eq] at IH1
rw [permutationsAux_cons,
length_foldr_permutationsAux2' _ _ _ _ _ fun l m => (perm_of_mem_permutations m).length_eq,
permutations, length, length, IH2, Nat.succ_add, Nat.factorial_succ, Nat.mul_comm (_ + 1),
← Nat.succ_eq_add_one, ← IH1, Nat.add_comm (_ * _), Nat.add_assoc, Nat.mul_succ, Nat.mul_comm]
#align list.length_permutations_aux List.length_permutationsAux
theorem length_permutations (l : List α) : length (permutations l) = (length l)! :=
length_permutationsAux l []
#align list.length_permutations List.length_permutations
theorem mem_permutations_of_perm_lemma {is l : List α}
(H : l ~ [] ++ is → (∃ (ts' : _) (_ : ts' ~ []), l = ts' ++ is) ∨ l ∈ permutationsAux is []) :
l ~ is → l ∈ permutations is := by simpa [permutations, perm_nil] using H
#align list.mem_permutations_of_perm_lemma List.mem_permutations_of_perm_lemma
theorem mem_permutationsAux_of_perm :
∀ {ts is l : List α},
l ~ is ++ ts → (∃ (is' : _) (_ : is' ~ is), l = is' ++ ts) ∨ l ∈ permutationsAux ts is := by
show ∀ (ts is l : List α),
l ~ is ++ ts → (∃ (is' : _) (_ : is' ~ is), l = is' ++ ts) ∨ l ∈ permutationsAux ts is
refine permutationsAux.rec (by simp) ?_
intro t ts is IH1 IH2 l p
rw [permutationsAux_cons, mem_foldr_permutationsAux2]
rcases IH1 _ (p.trans perm_middle) with (⟨is', p', e⟩ | m)
· clear p
subst e
rcases append_of_mem (p'.symm.subset (mem_cons_self _ _)) with ⟨l₁, l₂, e⟩
subst is'
have p := (perm_middle.symm.trans p').cons_inv
cases' l₂ with a l₂'
· exact Or.inl ⟨l₁, by simpa using p⟩
· exact Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨l₁, a :: l₂', mem_permutations_of_perm_lemma (IH2 _) p, by simp⟩)
· exact Or.inr (Or.inl m)
#align list.mem_permutations_aux_of_perm List.mem_permutationsAux_of_perm
@[simp]
theorem mem_permutations {s t : List α} : s ∈ permutations t ↔ s ~ t :=
⟨perm_of_mem_permutations, mem_permutations_of_perm_lemma mem_permutationsAux_of_perm⟩
#align list.mem_permutations List.mem_permutations
-- Porting note: temporary theorem to solve diamond issue
private theorem DecEq_eq [DecidableEq α] :
List.instBEq = @instBEqOfDecidableEq (List α) instDecidableEqList :=
congr_arg BEq.mk <| by
funext l₁ l₂
show (l₁ == l₂) = _
rw [Bool.eq_iff_iff, @beq_iff_eq _ (_), decide_eq_true_iff]
theorem perm_permutations'Aux_comm (a b : α) (l : List α) :
(permutations'Aux a l).bind (permutations'Aux b) ~
(permutations'Aux b l).bind (permutations'Aux a) := by
induction' l with c l ih
· simp [swap]
simp only [permutations'Aux, cons_bind, map_cons, map_map, cons_append]
apply Perm.swap'
have :
∀ a b,
(map (cons c) (permutations'Aux a l)).bind (permutations'Aux b) ~
map (cons b ∘ cons c) (permutations'Aux a l) ++
map (cons c) ((permutations'Aux a l).bind (permutations'Aux b)) := by
intros a' b'
simp only [map_bind, permutations'Aux]
show List.bind (permutations'Aux _ l) (fun a => ([b' :: c :: a] ++
map (cons c) (permutations'Aux _ a))) ~ _
refine (bind_append_perm _ (fun x => [b' :: c :: x]) _).symm.trans ?_
rw [← map_eq_bind, ← bind_map]
exact Perm.refl _
refine (((this _ _).append_left _).trans ?_).trans ((this _ _).append_left _).symm
rw [← append_assoc, ← append_assoc]
exact perm_append_comm.append (ih.map _)
#align list.perm_permutations'_aux_comm List.perm_permutations'Aux_comm
theorem Perm.permutations' {s t : List α} (p : s ~ t) : permutations' s ~ permutations' t := by
induction' p with a s t _ IH a b l s t u _ _ IH₁ IH₂; · simp
· exact IH.bind_right _
· dsimp
rw [bind_assoc, bind_assoc]
apply Perm.bind_left
intro l' _
apply perm_permutations'Aux_comm
· exact IH₁.trans IH₂
#align list.perm.permutations' List.Perm.permutations'
theorem permutations_perm_permutations' (ts : List α) : ts.permutations ~ ts.permutations' := by
obtain ⟨n, h⟩ : ∃ n, length ts < n := ⟨_, Nat.lt_succ_self _⟩
induction' n with n IH generalizing ts; · cases h
refine List.reverseRecOn ts (fun _ => ?_) (fun ts t _ h => ?_) h; · simp [permutations]
rw [← concat_eq_append, length_concat, Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff] at h
have IH₂ := (IH ts.reverse (by rwa [length_reverse])).trans (reverse_perm _).permutations'
simp only [permutations_append, foldr_permutationsAux2, permutationsAux_nil,
permutationsAux_cons, append_nil]
refine
(perm_append_comm.trans ((IH₂.bind_right _).append ((IH _ h).map _))).trans
(Perm.trans ?_ perm_append_comm.permutations')
rw [map_eq_bind, singleton_append, permutations']
refine (bind_append_perm _ _ _).trans ?_
refine Perm.of_eq ?_
congr
funext _
rw [permutations'Aux_eq_permutationsAux2, permutationsAux2_append]
#align list.permutations_perm_permutations' List.permutations_perm_permutations'
@[simp]
theorem mem_permutations' {s t : List α} : s ∈ permutations' t ↔ s ~ t :=
(permutations_perm_permutations' _).symm.mem_iff.trans mem_permutations
#align list.mem_permutations' List.mem_permutations'
theorem Perm.permutations {s t : List α} (h : s ~ t) : permutations s ~ permutations t :=
(permutations_perm_permutations' _).trans <|
h.permutations'.trans (permutations_perm_permutations' _).symm
#align list.perm.permutations List.Perm.permutations
@[simp]
theorem perm_permutations_iff {s t : List α} : permutations s ~ permutations t ↔ s ~ t :=
⟨fun h => mem_permutations.1 <| h.mem_iff.1 <| mem_permutations.2 (Perm.refl _),
Perm.permutations⟩
#align list.perm_permutations_iff List.perm_permutations_iff
@[simp]
theorem perm_permutations'_iff {s t : List α} : permutations' s ~ permutations' t ↔ s ~ t :=
⟨fun h => mem_permutations'.1 <| h.mem_iff.1 <| mem_permutations'.2 (Perm.refl _),
Perm.permutations'⟩
#align list.perm_permutations'_iff List.perm_permutations'_iff
theorem get_permutations'Aux (s : List α) (x : α) (n : ℕ)
(hn : n < length (permutations'Aux x s)) :
(permutations'Aux x s).get ⟨n, hn⟩ = s.insertNth n x := by
induction' s with y s IH generalizing n
· simp only [length, Nat.zero_add, Nat.lt_one_iff] at hn
simp [hn]
· cases n
· simp [get]
· simpa [get] using IH _ _
#align list.nth_le_permutations'_aux List.get_permutations'Aux
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated get_permutations'Aux (since := "2024-04-23")]
theorem nthLe_permutations'Aux (s : List α) (x : α) (n : ℕ)
(hn : n < length (permutations'Aux x s)) :
(permutations'Aux x s).nthLe n hn = s.insertNth n x :=
get_permutations'Aux s x n hn
theorem count_permutations'Aux_self [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) (x : α) :
count (x :: l) (permutations'Aux x l) = length (takeWhile (x = ·) l) + 1 := by
induction' l with y l IH generalizing x
· simp [takeWhile, count]
· rw [permutations'Aux, DecEq_eq, count_cons_self]
by_cases hx : x = y
· subst hx
simpa [takeWhile, Nat.succ_inj', DecEq_eq] using IH _
· rw [takeWhile]
simp only [mem_map, cons.injEq, Ne.symm hx, false_and, and_false, exists_false,
not_false_iff, count_eq_zero_of_not_mem, Nat.zero_add, hx, decide_False, length_nil]
#align list.count_permutations'_aux_self List.count_permutations'Aux_self
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/List/Perm.lean | 802 | 806 | theorem length_permutations'Aux (s : List α) (x : α) :
length (permutations'Aux x s) = length s + 1 := by |
induction' s with y s IH
· simp
· simpa using IH
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Aut
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
#align_import algebra.quandle from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"28aa996fc6fb4317f0083c4e6daf79878d81be33"
open MulOpposite
universe u v
class Shelf (α : Type u) where
act : α → α → α
self_distrib : ∀ {x y z : α}, act x (act y z) = act (act x y) (act x z)
#align shelf Shelf
class UnitalShelf (α : Type u) extends Shelf α, One α :=
(one_act : ∀ a : α, act 1 a = a)
(act_one : ∀ a : α, act a 1 = a)
#align unital_shelf UnitalShelf
@[ext]
structure ShelfHom (S₁ : Type*) (S₂ : Type*) [Shelf S₁] [Shelf S₂] where
toFun : S₁ → S₂
map_act' : ∀ {x y : S₁}, toFun (Shelf.act x y) = Shelf.act (toFun x) (toFun y)
#align shelf_hom ShelfHom
#align shelf_hom.ext_iff ShelfHom.ext_iff
#align shelf_hom.ext ShelfHom.ext
class Rack (α : Type u) extends Shelf α where
invAct : α → α → α
left_inv : ∀ x, Function.LeftInverse (invAct x) (act x)
right_inv : ∀ x, Function.RightInverse (invAct x) (act x)
#align rack Rack
scoped[Quandles] infixr:65 " ◃ " => Shelf.act
scoped[Quandles] infixr:65 " ◃⁻¹ " => Rack.invAct
scoped[Quandles] infixr:25 " →◃ " => ShelfHom
open Quandles
namespace Rack
variable {R : Type*} [Rack R]
-- Porting note: No longer a need for `Rack.self_distrib`
export Shelf (self_distrib)
-- porting note, changed name to `act'` to not conflict with `Shelf.act`
def act' (x : R) : R ≃ R where
toFun := Shelf.act x
invFun := invAct x
left_inv := left_inv x
right_inv := right_inv x
#align rack.act Rack.act'
@[simp]
theorem act'_apply (x y : R) : act' x y = x ◃ y :=
rfl
#align rack.act_apply Rack.act'_apply
@[simp]
theorem act'_symm_apply (x y : R) : (act' x).symm y = x ◃⁻¹ y :=
rfl
#align rack.act_symm_apply Rack.act'_symm_apply
@[simp]
theorem invAct_apply (x y : R) : (act' x)⁻¹ y = x ◃⁻¹ y :=
rfl
#align rack.inv_act_apply Rack.invAct_apply
@[simp]
theorem invAct_act_eq (x y : R) : x ◃⁻¹ x ◃ y = y :=
left_inv x y
#align rack.inv_act_act_eq Rack.invAct_act_eq
@[simp]
theorem act_invAct_eq (x y : R) : x ◃ x ◃⁻¹ y = y :=
right_inv x y
#align rack.act_inv_act_eq Rack.act_invAct_eq
theorem left_cancel (x : R) {y y' : R} : x ◃ y = x ◃ y' ↔ y = y' := by
constructor
· apply (act' x).injective
rintro rfl
rfl
#align rack.left_cancel Rack.left_cancel
theorem left_cancel_inv (x : R) {y y' : R} : x ◃⁻¹ y = x ◃⁻¹ y' ↔ y = y' := by
constructor
· apply (act' x).symm.injective
rintro rfl
rfl
#align rack.left_cancel_inv Rack.left_cancel_inv
theorem self_distrib_inv {x y z : R} : x ◃⁻¹ y ◃⁻¹ z = (x ◃⁻¹ y) ◃⁻¹ x ◃⁻¹ z := by
rw [← left_cancel (x ◃⁻¹ y), right_inv, ← left_cancel x, right_inv, self_distrib]
repeat' rw [right_inv]
#align rack.self_distrib_inv Rack.self_distrib_inv
theorem ad_conj {R : Type*} [Rack R] (x y : R) : act' (x ◃ y) = act' x * act' y * (act' x)⁻¹ := by
rw [eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq]; ext z
apply self_distrib.symm
#align rack.ad_conj Rack.ad_conj
instance oppositeRack : Rack Rᵐᵒᵖ where
act x y := op (invAct (unop x) (unop y))
self_distrib := by
intro x y z
induction x using MulOpposite.rec'
induction y using MulOpposite.rec'
induction z using MulOpposite.rec'
simp only [op_inj, unop_op, op_unop]
rw [self_distrib_inv]
invAct x y := op (Shelf.act (unop x) (unop y))
left_inv := MulOpposite.rec' fun x => MulOpposite.rec' fun y => by simp
right_inv := MulOpposite.rec' fun x => MulOpposite.rec' fun y => by simp
#align rack.opposite_rack Rack.oppositeRack
@[simp]
theorem op_act_op_eq {x y : R} : op x ◃ op y = op (x ◃⁻¹ y) :=
rfl
#align rack.op_act_op_eq Rack.op_act_op_eq
@[simp]
theorem op_invAct_op_eq {x y : R} : op x ◃⁻¹ op y = op (x ◃ y) :=
rfl
#align rack.op_inv_act_op_eq Rack.op_invAct_op_eq
@[simp]
theorem self_act_act_eq {x y : R} : (x ◃ x) ◃ y = x ◃ y := by rw [← right_inv x y, ← self_distrib]
#align rack.self_act_act_eq Rack.self_act_act_eq
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Quandle.lean | 287 | 289 | theorem self_invAct_invAct_eq {x y : R} : (x ◃⁻¹ x) ◃⁻¹ y = x ◃⁻¹ y := by |
have h := @self_act_act_eq _ _ (op x) (op y)
simpa using h
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Circle
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.Basic
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.oriented.rotation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0c8bf9245297a541f468be517f1bde6195105e9"
noncomputable section
open FiniteDimensional Complex
open scoped Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace Orientation
attribute [local instance] Complex.finrank_real_complex_fact
variable {V V' : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedAddCommGroup V']
variable [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V']
variable [Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Fact (finrank ℝ V' = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
local notation "J" => o.rightAngleRotation
def rotationAux (θ : Real.Angle) : V →ₗᵢ[ℝ] V :=
LinearMap.isometryOfInner
(Real.Angle.cos θ • LinearMap.id +
Real.Angle.sin θ • (LinearIsometryEquiv.toLinearEquiv J).toLinearMap)
(by
intro x y
simp only [RCLike.conj_to_real, id, LinearMap.smul_apply, LinearMap.add_apply,
LinearMap.id_coe, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_toLinearEquiv,
Orientation.areaForm_rightAngleRotation_left, Orientation.inner_rightAngleRotation_left,
Orientation.inner_rightAngleRotation_right, inner_add_left, inner_smul_left,
inner_add_right, inner_smul_right]
linear_combination inner (𝕜 := ℝ) x y * θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq)
#align orientation.rotation_aux Orientation.rotationAux
@[simp]
theorem rotationAux_apply (θ : Real.Angle) (x : V) :
o.rotationAux θ x = Real.Angle.cos θ • x + Real.Angle.sin θ • J x :=
rfl
#align orientation.rotation_aux_apply Orientation.rotationAux_apply
def rotation (θ : Real.Angle) : V ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] V :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ofLinearIsometry (o.rotationAux θ)
(Real.Angle.cos θ • LinearMap.id -
Real.Angle.sin θ • (LinearIsometryEquiv.toLinearEquiv J).toLinearMap)
(by
ext x
convert congr_arg (fun t : ℝ => t • x) θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq using 1
· simp only [o.rightAngleRotation_rightAngleRotation, o.rotationAux_apply,
Function.comp_apply, id, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearIsometry.coe_toLinearMap,
LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_toLinearEquiv, map_smul, map_sub, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LinearMap.id_coe, LinearMap.smul_apply, LinearMap.sub_apply, ← mul_smul, add_smul,
smul_add, smul_neg, smul_sub, mul_comm, sq]
abel
· simp)
(by
ext x
convert congr_arg (fun t : ℝ => t • x) θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq using 1
· simp only [o.rightAngleRotation_rightAngleRotation, o.rotationAux_apply,
Function.comp_apply, id, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearIsometry.coe_toLinearMap,
LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_toLinearEquiv, map_add, map_smul, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LinearMap.id_coe, LinearMap.smul_apply, LinearMap.sub_apply,
add_smul, smul_neg, smul_sub, smul_smul]
ring_nf
abel
· simp)
#align orientation.rotation Orientation.rotation
theorem rotation_apply (θ : Real.Angle) (x : V) :
o.rotation θ x = Real.Angle.cos θ • x + Real.Angle.sin θ • J x :=
rfl
#align orientation.rotation_apply Orientation.rotation_apply
theorem rotation_symm_apply (θ : Real.Angle) (x : V) :
(o.rotation θ).symm x = Real.Angle.cos θ • x - Real.Angle.sin θ • J x :=
rfl
#align orientation.rotation_symm_apply Orientation.rotation_symm_apply
theorem rotation_eq_matrix_toLin (θ : Real.Angle) {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(o.rotation θ).toLinearMap =
Matrix.toLin (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx) (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx)
!![θ.cos, -θ.sin; θ.sin, θ.cos] := by
apply (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx).ext
intro i
fin_cases i
· rw [Matrix.toLin_self]
simp [rotation_apply, Fin.sum_univ_succ]
· rw [Matrix.toLin_self]
simp [rotation_apply, Fin.sum_univ_succ, add_comm]
#align orientation.rotation_eq_matrix_to_lin Orientation.rotation_eq_matrix_toLin
@[simp]
theorem det_rotation (θ : Real.Angle) : LinearMap.det (o.rotation θ).toLinearMap = 1 := by
haveI : Nontrivial V :=
FiniteDimensional.nontrivial_of_finrank_eq_succ (@Fact.out (finrank ℝ V = 2) _)
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ : ∃ x, x ≠ (0 : V) := exists_ne (0 : V)
rw [o.rotation_eq_matrix_toLin θ hx]
simpa [sq] using θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq
#align orientation.det_rotation Orientation.det_rotation
@[simp]
theorem linearEquiv_det_rotation (θ : Real.Angle) :
LinearEquiv.det (o.rotation θ).toLinearEquiv = 1 :=
Units.ext <| by
-- Porting note: Lean can't see through `LinearEquiv.coe_det` and needed the rewrite
-- in mathlib3 this was just `units.ext <| o.det_rotation θ`
simpa only [LinearEquiv.coe_det, Units.val_one] using o.det_rotation θ
#align orientation.linear_equiv_det_rotation Orientation.linearEquiv_det_rotation
@[simp]
theorem rotation_symm (θ : Real.Angle) : (o.rotation θ).symm = o.rotation (-θ) := by
ext; simp [o.rotation_apply, o.rotation_symm_apply, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align orientation.rotation_symm Orientation.rotation_symm
@[simp]
theorem rotation_zero : o.rotation 0 = LinearIsometryEquiv.refl ℝ V := by ext; simp [rotation]
#align orientation.rotation_zero Orientation.rotation_zero
@[simp]
theorem rotation_pi : o.rotation π = LinearIsometryEquiv.neg ℝ := by
ext x
simp [rotation]
#align orientation.rotation_pi Orientation.rotation_pi
theorem rotation_pi_apply (x : V) : o.rotation π x = -x := by simp
#align orientation.rotation_pi_apply Orientation.rotation_pi_apply
theorem rotation_pi_div_two : o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) = J := by
ext x
simp [rotation]
#align orientation.rotation_pi_div_two Orientation.rotation_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem rotation_rotation (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) (x : V) :
o.rotation θ₁ (o.rotation θ₂ x) = o.rotation (θ₁ + θ₂) x := by
simp only [o.rotation_apply, ← mul_smul, Real.Angle.cos_add, Real.Angle.sin_add, add_smul,
sub_smul, LinearIsometryEquiv.trans_apply, smul_add, LinearIsometryEquiv.map_add,
LinearIsometryEquiv.map_smul, rightAngleRotation_rightAngleRotation, smul_neg]
ring_nf
abel
#align orientation.rotation_rotation Orientation.rotation_rotation
@[simp]
theorem rotation_trans (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) :
(o.rotation θ₁).trans (o.rotation θ₂) = o.rotation (θ₂ + θ₁) :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ext fun _ => by rw [← rotation_rotation, LinearIsometryEquiv.trans_apply]
#align orientation.rotation_trans Orientation.rotation_trans
@[simp]
theorem kahler_rotation_left (x y : V) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.kahler (o.rotation θ x) y = conj (θ.expMapCircle : ℂ) * o.kahler x y := by
-- Porting note: this needed the `Complex.conj_ofReal` instead of `RCLike.conj_ofReal`;
-- I believe this is because the respective coercions are no longer defeq, and
-- `Real.Angle.coe_expMapCircle` uses the `Complex` version.
simp only [o.rotation_apply, map_add, map_mul, LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, RingHom.id_apply,
LinearMap.add_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, real_smul, kahler_rightAngleRotation_left,
Real.Angle.coe_expMapCircle, Complex.conj_ofReal, conj_I]
ring
#align orientation.kahler_rotation_left Orientation.kahler_rotation_left
theorem neg_rotation (θ : Real.Angle) (x : V) : -o.rotation θ x = o.rotation (π + θ) x := by
rw [← o.rotation_pi_apply, rotation_rotation]
#align orientation.neg_rotation Orientation.neg_rotation
@[simp]
theorem neg_rotation_neg_pi_div_two (x : V) :
-o.rotation (-π / 2 : ℝ) x = o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x := by
rw [neg_rotation, ← Real.Angle.coe_add, neg_div, ← sub_eq_add_neg, sub_half]
#align orientation.neg_rotation_neg_pi_div_two Orientation.neg_rotation_neg_pi_div_two
theorem neg_rotation_pi_div_two (x : V) : -o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x = o.rotation (-π / 2 : ℝ) x :=
(neg_eq_iff_eq_neg.mp <| o.neg_rotation_neg_pi_div_two _).symm
#align orientation.neg_rotation_pi_div_two Orientation.neg_rotation_pi_div_two
theorem kahler_rotation_left' (x y : V) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.kahler (o.rotation θ x) y = (-θ).expMapCircle * o.kahler x y := by
simp only [Real.Angle.expMapCircle_neg, coe_inv_circle_eq_conj, kahler_rotation_left]
#align orientation.kahler_rotation_left' Orientation.kahler_rotation_left'
@[simp]
theorem kahler_rotation_right (x y : V) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.kahler x (o.rotation θ y) = θ.expMapCircle * o.kahler x y := by
simp only [o.rotation_apply, map_add, LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, RingHom.id_apply, real_smul,
kahler_rightAngleRotation_right, Real.Angle.coe_expMapCircle]
ring
#align orientation.kahler_rotation_right Orientation.kahler_rotation_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_rotation_left {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.oangle (o.rotation θ x) y = o.oangle x y - θ := by
simp only [oangle, o.kahler_rotation_left']
rw [Complex.arg_mul_coe_angle, Real.Angle.arg_expMapCircle]
· abel
· exact ne_zero_of_mem_circle _
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
#align orientation.oangle_rotation_left Orientation.oangle_rotation_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_rotation_right {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.oangle x (o.rotation θ y) = o.oangle x y + θ := by
simp only [oangle, o.kahler_rotation_right]
rw [Complex.arg_mul_coe_angle, Real.Angle.arg_expMapCircle]
· abel
· exact ne_zero_of_mem_circle _
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
#align orientation.oangle_rotation_right Orientation.oangle_rotation_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_rotation_self_left {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.oangle (o.rotation θ x) x = -θ := by simp [hx]
#align orientation.oangle_rotation_self_left Orientation.oangle_rotation_self_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_rotation_self_right {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.oangle x (o.rotation θ x) = θ := by simp [hx]
#align orientation.oangle_rotation_self_right Orientation.oangle_rotation_self_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_rotation_oangle_left (x y : V) : o.oangle (o.rotation (o.oangle x y) x) y = 0 := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
· simp [hx, hy]
#align orientation.oangle_rotation_oangle_left Orientation.oangle_rotation_oangle_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_rotation_oangle_right (x y : V) : o.oangle y (o.rotation (o.oangle x y) x) = 0 := by
rw [oangle_rev]
simp
#align orientation.oangle_rotation_oangle_right Orientation.oangle_rotation_oangle_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_rotation (x y : V) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.oangle (o.rotation θ x) (o.rotation θ y) = o.oangle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0 <;> by_cases hy : y = 0 <;> simp [hx, hy]
#align orientation.oangle_rotation Orientation.oangle_rotation
@[simp]
theorem rotation_eq_self_iff_angle_eq_zero {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.rotation θ x = x ↔ θ = 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [eq_comm]
simpa [hx, h] using o.oangle_rotation_right hx hx θ
· intro h
simp [h]
#align orientation.rotation_eq_self_iff_angle_eq_zero Orientation.rotation_eq_self_iff_angle_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem eq_rotation_self_iff_angle_eq_zero {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (θ : Real.Angle) :
x = o.rotation θ x ↔ θ = 0 := by rw [← o.rotation_eq_self_iff_angle_eq_zero hx, eq_comm]
#align orientation.eq_rotation_self_iff_angle_eq_zero Orientation.eq_rotation_self_iff_angle_eq_zero
theorem rotation_eq_self_iff (x : V) (θ : Real.Angle) : o.rotation θ x = x ↔ x = 0 ∨ θ = 0 := by
by_cases h : x = 0 <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.rotation_eq_self_iff Orientation.rotation_eq_self_iff
theorem eq_rotation_self_iff (x : V) (θ : Real.Angle) : x = o.rotation θ x ↔ x = 0 ∨ θ = 0 := by
rw [← rotation_eq_self_iff, eq_comm]
#align orientation.eq_rotation_self_iff Orientation.eq_rotation_self_iff
@[simp]
theorem rotation_oangle_eq_iff_norm_eq (x y : V) : o.rotation (o.oangle x y) x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [← h, LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map]
· intro h
rw [o.eq_iff_oangle_eq_zero_of_norm_eq] <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.rotation_oangle_eq_iff_norm_eq Orientation.rotation_oangle_eq_iff_norm_eq
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Rotation.lean | 324 | 333 | theorem oangle_eq_iff_eq_norm_div_norm_smul_rotation_of_ne_zero {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0)
(θ : Real.Angle) : o.oangle x y = θ ↔ y = (‖y‖ / ‖x‖) • o.rotation θ x := by |
have hp := div_pos (norm_pos_iff.2 hy) (norm_pos_iff.2 hx)
constructor
· rintro rfl
rw [← LinearIsometryEquiv.map_smul, ← o.oangle_smul_left_of_pos x y hp, eq_comm,
rotation_oangle_eq_iff_norm_eq, norm_smul, Real.norm_of_nonneg hp.le,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx)]
· intro hye
rw [hye, o.oangle_smul_right_of_pos _ _ hp, o.oangle_rotation_self_right hx]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.LeftRight
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Monotone
#align_import topology.algebra.order.left_right_lim from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0a0ec35061ed9960bf0e7ffb0335f44447b58977"
open Set Filter
open Topology
section
variable {α β : Type*} [LinearOrder α] [TopologicalSpace β]
noncomputable def Function.leftLim (f : α → β) (a : α) : β := by
classical
haveI : Nonempty β := ⟨f a⟩
letI : TopologicalSpace α := Preorder.topology α
exact if 𝓝[<] a = ⊥ ∨ ¬∃ y, Tendsto f (𝓝[<] a) (𝓝 y) then f a else limUnder (𝓝[<] a) f
#align function.left_lim Function.leftLim
noncomputable def Function.rightLim (f : α → β) (a : α) : β :=
@Function.leftLim αᵒᵈ β _ _ f a
#align function.right_lim Function.rightLim
open Function
theorem leftLim_eq_of_tendsto [hα : TopologicalSpace α] [h'α : OrderTopology α] [T2Space β]
{f : α → β} {a : α} {y : β} (h : 𝓝[<] a ≠ ⊥) (h' : Tendsto f (𝓝[<] a) (𝓝 y)) :
leftLim f a = y := by
have h'' : ∃ y, Tendsto f (𝓝[<] a) (𝓝 y) := ⟨y, h'⟩
rw [h'α.topology_eq_generate_intervals] at h h' h''
simp only [leftLim, h, h'', not_true, or_self_iff, if_false]
haveI := neBot_iff.2 h
exact lim_eq h'
#align left_lim_eq_of_tendsto leftLim_eq_of_tendsto
theorem leftLim_eq_of_eq_bot [hα : TopologicalSpace α] [h'α : OrderTopology α] (f : α → β) {a : α}
(h : 𝓝[<] a = ⊥) : leftLim f a = f a := by
rw [h'α.topology_eq_generate_intervals] at h
simp [leftLim, ite_eq_left_iff, h]
#align left_lim_eq_of_eq_bot leftLim_eq_of_eq_bot
theorem rightLim_eq_of_tendsto [TopologicalSpace α] [OrderTopology α] [T2Space β]
{f : α → β} {a : α} {y : β} (h : 𝓝[>] a ≠ ⊥) (h' : Tendsto f (𝓝[>] a) (𝓝 y)) :
Function.rightLim f a = y :=
@leftLim_eq_of_tendsto αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ f a y h h'
#align right_lim_eq_of_tendsto rightLim_eq_of_tendsto
theorem rightLim_eq_of_eq_bot [TopologicalSpace α] [OrderTopology α] (f : α → β) {a : α}
(h : 𝓝[>] a = ⊥) : rightLim f a = f a :=
@leftLim_eq_of_eq_bot αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ f a h
end
open Function
namespace Monotone
variable {α β : Type*} [LinearOrder α] [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] [TopologicalSpace β]
[OrderTopology β] {f : α → β} (hf : Monotone f) {x y : α}
theorem leftLim_eq_sSup [TopologicalSpace α] [OrderTopology α] (h : 𝓝[<] x ≠ ⊥) :
leftLim f x = sSup (f '' Iio x) :=
leftLim_eq_of_tendsto h (hf.tendsto_nhdsWithin_Iio x)
#align monotone.left_lim_eq_Sup Monotone.leftLim_eq_sSup
theorem rightLim_eq_sInf [TopologicalSpace α] [OrderTopology α] (h : 𝓝[>] x ≠ ⊥) :
rightLim f x = sInf (f '' Ioi x) :=
rightLim_eq_of_tendsto h (hf.tendsto_nhdsWithin_Ioi x)
#align right_lim_eq_Inf Monotone.rightLim_eq_sInf
theorem leftLim_le (h : x ≤ y) : leftLim f x ≤ f y := by
letI : TopologicalSpace α := Preorder.topology α
haveI : OrderTopology α := ⟨rfl⟩
rcases eq_or_ne (𝓝[<] x) ⊥ with (h' | h')
· simpa [leftLim, h'] using hf h
haveI A : NeBot (𝓝[<] x) := neBot_iff.2 h'
rw [leftLim_eq_sSup hf h']
refine csSup_le ?_ ?_
· simp only [image_nonempty]
exact (forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot.2 A) _ self_mem_nhdsWithin
· simp only [mem_image, mem_Iio, forall_exists_index, and_imp, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂]
intro z hz
exact hf (hz.le.trans h)
#align monotone.left_lim_le Monotone.leftLim_le
theorem le_leftLim (h : x < y) : f x ≤ leftLim f y := by
letI : TopologicalSpace α := Preorder.topology α
haveI : OrderTopology α := ⟨rfl⟩
rcases eq_or_ne (𝓝[<] y) ⊥ with (h' | h')
· rw [leftLim_eq_of_eq_bot _ h']
exact hf h.le
rw [leftLim_eq_sSup hf h']
refine le_csSup ⟨f y, ?_⟩ (mem_image_of_mem _ h)
simp only [upperBounds, mem_image, mem_Iio, forall_exists_index, and_imp,
forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂, mem_setOf_eq]
intro z hz
exact hf hz.le
#align monotone.le_left_lim Monotone.le_leftLim
@[mono]
protected theorem leftLim : Monotone (leftLim f) := by
intro x y h
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h with (rfl | hxy)
· exact le_rfl
· exact (hf.leftLim_le le_rfl).trans (hf.le_leftLim hxy)
#align monotone.left_lim Monotone.leftLim
theorem le_rightLim (h : x ≤ y) : f x ≤ rightLim f y :=
hf.dual.leftLim_le h
#align monotone.le_right_lim Monotone.le_rightLim
theorem rightLim_le (h : x < y) : rightLim f x ≤ f y :=
hf.dual.le_leftLim h
#align monotone.right_lim_le Monotone.rightLim_le
@[mono]
protected theorem rightLim : Monotone (rightLim f) := fun _ _ h => hf.dual.leftLim h
#align monotone.right_lim Monotone.rightLim
theorem leftLim_le_rightLim (h : x ≤ y) : leftLim f x ≤ rightLim f y :=
(hf.leftLim_le le_rfl).trans (hf.le_rightLim h)
#align monotone.left_lim_le_right_lim Monotone.leftLim_le_rightLim
theorem rightLim_le_leftLim (h : x < y) : rightLim f x ≤ leftLim f y := by
letI : TopologicalSpace α := Preorder.topology α
haveI : OrderTopology α := ⟨rfl⟩
rcases eq_or_ne (𝓝[<] y) ⊥ with (h' | h')
· simp [leftLim, h']
exact rightLim_le hf h
obtain ⟨a, ⟨xa, ay⟩⟩ : (Ioo x y).Nonempty :=
forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot.2 (neBot_iff.2 h') (Ioo x y)
(Ioo_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio ⟨h, le_refl _⟩)
calc
rightLim f x ≤ f a := hf.rightLim_le xa
_ ≤ leftLim f y := hf.le_leftLim ay
#align monotone.right_lim_le_left_lim Monotone.rightLim_le_leftLim
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [OrderTopology α]
theorem tendsto_leftLim (x : α) : Tendsto f (𝓝[<] x) (𝓝 (leftLim f x)) := by
rcases eq_or_ne (𝓝[<] x) ⊥ with (h' | h')
· simp [h']
rw [leftLim_eq_sSup hf h']
exact hf.tendsto_nhdsWithin_Iio x
#align monotone.tendsto_left_lim Monotone.tendsto_leftLim
theorem tendsto_leftLim_within (x : α) : Tendsto f (𝓝[<] x) (𝓝[≤] leftLim f x) := by
apply tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within f (hf.tendsto_leftLim x)
filter_upwards [@self_mem_nhdsWithin _ _ x (Iio x)] with y hy using hf.le_leftLim hy
#align monotone.tendsto_left_lim_within Monotone.tendsto_leftLim_within
theorem tendsto_rightLim (x : α) : Tendsto f (𝓝[>] x) (𝓝 (rightLim f x)) :=
hf.dual.tendsto_leftLim x
#align monotone.tendsto_right_lim Monotone.tendsto_rightLim
theorem tendsto_rightLim_within (x : α) : Tendsto f (𝓝[>] x) (𝓝[≥] rightLim f x) :=
hf.dual.tendsto_leftLim_within x
#align monotone.tendsto_right_lim_within Monotone.tendsto_rightLim_within
theorem continuousWithinAt_Iio_iff_leftLim_eq :
ContinuousWithinAt f (Iio x) x ↔ leftLim f x = f x := by
rcases eq_or_ne (𝓝[<] x) ⊥ with (h' | h')
· simp [leftLim_eq_of_eq_bot f h', ContinuousWithinAt, h']
haveI : (𝓝[Iio x] x).NeBot := neBot_iff.2 h'
refine ⟨fun h => tendsto_nhds_unique (hf.tendsto_leftLim x) h.tendsto, fun h => ?_⟩
have := hf.tendsto_leftLim x
rwa [h] at this
#align monotone.continuous_within_at_Iio_iff_left_lim_eq Monotone.continuousWithinAt_Iio_iff_leftLim_eq
theorem continuousWithinAt_Ioi_iff_rightLim_eq :
ContinuousWithinAt f (Ioi x) x ↔ rightLim f x = f x :=
hf.dual.continuousWithinAt_Iio_iff_leftLim_eq
#align monotone.continuous_within_at_Ioi_iff_right_lim_eq Monotone.continuousWithinAt_Ioi_iff_rightLim_eq
theorem continuousAt_iff_leftLim_eq_rightLim : ContinuousAt f x ↔ leftLim f x = rightLim f x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· have A : leftLim f x = f x :=
hf.continuousWithinAt_Iio_iff_leftLim_eq.1 h.continuousWithinAt
have B : rightLim f x = f x :=
hf.continuousWithinAt_Ioi_iff_rightLim_eq.1 h.continuousWithinAt
exact A.trans B.symm
· have h' : leftLim f x = f x := by
apply le_antisymm (leftLim_le hf (le_refl _))
rw [h]
exact le_rightLim hf (le_refl _)
refine continuousAt_iff_continuous_left'_right'.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· exact hf.continuousWithinAt_Iio_iff_leftLim_eq.2 h'
· rw [h] at h'
exact hf.continuousWithinAt_Ioi_iff_rightLim_eq.2 h'
#align monotone.continuous_at_iff_left_lim_eq_right_lim Monotone.continuousAt_iff_leftLim_eq_rightLim
theorem countable_not_continuousWithinAt_Ioi [SecondCountableTopology β] :
Set.Countable { x | ¬ContinuousWithinAt f (Ioi x) x } := by
apply (countable_image_lt_image_Ioi f).mono
rintro x (hx : ¬ContinuousWithinAt f (Ioi x) x)
dsimp
contrapose! hx
refine tendsto_order.2 ⟨fun m hm => ?_, fun u hu => ?_⟩
· filter_upwards [@self_mem_nhdsWithin _ _ x (Ioi x)] with y hy using hm.trans_le
(hf (le_of_lt hy))
rcases hx u hu with ⟨v, xv, fvu⟩
have : Ioo x v ∈ 𝓝[>] x := Ioo_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi ⟨le_refl _, xv⟩
filter_upwards [this] with y hy
apply (hf hy.2.le).trans_lt fvu
#align monotone.countable_not_continuous_within_at_Ioi Monotone.countable_not_continuousWithinAt_Ioi
theorem countable_not_continuousWithinAt_Iio [SecondCountableTopology β] :
Set.Countable { x | ¬ContinuousWithinAt f (Iio x) x } :=
hf.dual.countable_not_continuousWithinAt_Ioi
#align monotone.countable_not_continuous_within_at_Iio Monotone.countable_not_continuousWithinAt_Iio
| Mathlib/Topology/Order/LeftRightLim.lean | 265 | 274 | theorem countable_not_continuousAt [SecondCountableTopology β] :
Set.Countable { x | ¬ContinuousAt f x } := by |
apply
(hf.countable_not_continuousWithinAt_Ioi.union hf.countable_not_continuousWithinAt_Iio).mono
_
refine compl_subset_compl.1 ?_
simp only [compl_union]
rintro x ⟨hx, h'x⟩
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, Classical.not_not, mem_compl_iff] at hx h'x ⊢
exact continuousAt_iff_continuous_left'_right'.2 ⟨h'x, hx⟩
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Basic
#align_import analysis.locally_convex.balanced_core_hull from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
open Set Pointwise Topology Filter
variable {𝕜 E ι : Type*}
section balancedHull
section SeminormedRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜]
section SMul
variable (𝕜) [SMul 𝕜 E] {s t : Set E} {x : E}
def balancedCore (s : Set E) :=
⋃₀ { t : Set E | Balanced 𝕜 t ∧ t ⊆ s }
#align balanced_core balancedCore
def balancedCoreAux (s : Set E) :=
⋂ (r : 𝕜) (_ : 1 ≤ ‖r‖), r • s
#align balanced_core_aux balancedCoreAux
def balancedHull (s : Set E) :=
⋃ (r : 𝕜) (_ : ‖r‖ ≤ 1), r • s
#align balanced_hull balancedHull
variable {𝕜}
theorem balancedCore_subset (s : Set E) : balancedCore 𝕜 s ⊆ s :=
sUnion_subset fun _ ht => ht.2
#align balanced_core_subset balancedCore_subset
theorem balancedCore_empty : balancedCore 𝕜 (∅ : Set E) = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty (balancedCore_subset _)
#align balanced_core_empty balancedCore_empty
theorem mem_balancedCore_iff : x ∈ balancedCore 𝕜 s ↔ ∃ t, Balanced 𝕜 t ∧ t ⊆ s ∧ x ∈ t := by
simp_rw [balancedCore, mem_sUnion, mem_setOf_eq, and_assoc]
#align mem_balanced_core_iff mem_balancedCore_iff
theorem smul_balancedCore_subset (s : Set E) {a : 𝕜} (ha : ‖a‖ ≤ 1) :
a • balancedCore 𝕜 s ⊆ balancedCore 𝕜 s := by
rintro x ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
rw [mem_balancedCore_iff] at hy
rcases hy with ⟨t, ht1, ht2, hy⟩
exact ⟨t, ⟨ht1, ht2⟩, ht1 a ha (smul_mem_smul_set hy)⟩
#align smul_balanced_core_subset smul_balancedCore_subset
theorem balancedCore_balanced (s : Set E) : Balanced 𝕜 (balancedCore 𝕜 s) := fun _ =>
smul_balancedCore_subset s
#align balanced_core_balanced balancedCore_balanced
theorem Balanced.subset_balancedCore_of_subset (hs : Balanced 𝕜 s) (h : s ⊆ t) :
s ⊆ balancedCore 𝕜 t :=
subset_sUnion_of_mem ⟨hs, h⟩
#align balanced.subset_core_of_subset Balanced.subset_balancedCore_of_subset
theorem mem_balancedCoreAux_iff : x ∈ balancedCoreAux 𝕜 s ↔ ∀ r : 𝕜, 1 ≤ ‖r‖ → x ∈ r • s :=
mem_iInter₂
#align mem_balanced_core_aux_iff mem_balancedCoreAux_iff
theorem mem_balancedHull_iff : x ∈ balancedHull 𝕜 s ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, ‖r‖ ≤ 1 ∧ x ∈ r • s := by
simp [balancedHull]
#align mem_balanced_hull_iff mem_balancedHull_iff
| Mathlib/Analysis/LocallyConvex/BalancedCoreHull.lean | 114 | 118 | theorem Balanced.balancedHull_subset_of_subset (ht : Balanced 𝕜 t) (h : s ⊆ t) :
balancedHull 𝕜 s ⊆ t := by |
intros x hx
obtain ⟨r, hr, y, hy, rfl⟩ := mem_balancedHull_iff.1 hx
exact ht.smul_mem hr (h hy)
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Divisibility.Basic
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Ordering.Lemmas
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Principal
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
#align_import set_theory.ordinal.notation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b67044ba53af18680e1dd246861d9584e968495d"
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
open Ordinal Order
-- Porting note: the generated theorem is warned by `simpNF`.
set_option genSizeOfSpec false in
inductive ONote : Type
| zero : ONote
| oadd : ONote → ℕ+ → ONote → ONote
deriving DecidableEq
#align onote ONote
compile_inductive% ONote
namespace ONote
instance : Zero ONote :=
⟨zero⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_def : zero = 0 :=
rfl
#align onote.zero_def ONote.zero_def
instance : Inhabited ONote :=
⟨0⟩
instance : One ONote :=
⟨oadd 0 1 0⟩
def omega : ONote :=
oadd 1 1 0
#align onote.omega ONote.omega
@[simp]
noncomputable def repr : ONote → Ordinal.{0}
| 0 => 0
| oadd e n a => ω ^ repr e * n + repr a
#align onote.repr ONote.repr
def toStringAux1 (e : ONote) (n : ℕ) (s : String) : String :=
if e = 0 then toString n
else (if e = 1 then "ω" else "ω^(" ++ s ++ ")") ++ if n = 1 then "" else "*" ++ toString n
#align onote.to_string_aux1 ONote.toStringAux1
def toString : ONote → String
| zero => "0"
| oadd e n 0 => toStringAux1 e n (toString e)
| oadd e n a => toStringAux1 e n (toString e) ++ " + " ++ toString a
#align onote.to_string ONote.toString
open Lean in
def repr' (prec : ℕ) : ONote → Format
| zero => "0"
| oadd e n a =>
Repr.addAppParen
("oadd " ++ (repr' max_prec e) ++ " " ++ Nat.repr (n : ℕ) ++ " " ++ (repr' max_prec a))
prec
#align onote.repr' ONote.repr
instance : ToString ONote :=
⟨toString⟩
instance : Repr ONote where
reprPrec o prec := repr' prec o
instance : Preorder ONote where
le x y := repr x ≤ repr y
lt x y := repr x < repr y
le_refl _ := @le_refl Ordinal _ _
le_trans _ _ _ := @le_trans Ordinal _ _ _ _
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ := @lt_iff_le_not_le Ordinal _ _ _
theorem lt_def {x y : ONote} : x < y ↔ repr x < repr y :=
Iff.rfl
#align onote.lt_def ONote.lt_def
theorem le_def {x y : ONote} : x ≤ y ↔ repr x ≤ repr y :=
Iff.rfl
#align onote.le_def ONote.le_def
instance : WellFoundedRelation ONote :=
⟨(· < ·), InvImage.wf repr Ordinal.lt_wf⟩
@[coe]
def ofNat : ℕ → ONote
| 0 => 0
| Nat.succ n => oadd 0 n.succPNat 0
#align onote.of_nat ONote.ofNat
-- Porting note (#11467): during the port we marked these lemmas with `@[eqns]`
-- to emulate the old Lean 3 behaviour.
@[simp] theorem ofNat_zero : ofNat 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem ofNat_succ (n) : ofNat (Nat.succ n) = oadd 0 n.succPNat 0 :=
rfl
instance nat (n : ℕ) : OfNat ONote n where
ofNat := ofNat n
@[simp 1200]
theorem ofNat_one : ofNat 1 = 1 :=
rfl
#align onote.of_nat_one ONote.ofNat_one
@[simp]
theorem repr_ofNat (n : ℕ) : repr (ofNat n) = n := by cases n <;> simp
#align onote.repr_of_nat ONote.repr_ofNat
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem repr_one : repr (ofNat 1) = (1 : ℕ) := repr_ofNat 1
#align onote.repr_one ONote.repr_one
theorem omega_le_oadd (e n a) : ω ^ repr e ≤ repr (oadd e n a) := by
refine le_trans ?_ (le_add_right _ _)
simpa using (Ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left <| opow_pos (repr e) omega_pos).2 (natCast_le.2 n.2)
#align onote.omega_le_oadd ONote.omega_le_oadd
theorem oadd_pos (e n a) : 0 < oadd e n a :=
@lt_of_lt_of_le _ _ _ (ω ^ repr e) _ (opow_pos (repr e) omega_pos) (omega_le_oadd e n a)
#align onote.oadd_pos ONote.oadd_pos
def cmp : ONote → ONote → Ordering
| 0, 0 => Ordering.eq
| _, 0 => Ordering.gt
| 0, _ => Ordering.lt
| _o₁@(oadd e₁ n₁ a₁), _o₂@(oadd e₂ n₂ a₂) =>
(cmp e₁ e₂).orElse <| (_root_.cmp (n₁ : ℕ) n₂).orElse (cmp a₁ a₂)
#align onote.cmp ONote.cmp
theorem eq_of_cmp_eq : ∀ {o₁ o₂}, cmp o₁ o₂ = Ordering.eq → o₁ = o₂
| 0, 0, _ => rfl
| oadd e n a, 0, h => by injection h
| 0, oadd e n a, h => by injection h
| oadd e₁ n₁ a₁, oadd e₂ n₂ a₂, h => by
revert h; simp only [cmp]
cases h₁ : cmp e₁ e₂ <;> intro h <;> try cases h
obtain rfl := eq_of_cmp_eq h₁
revert h; cases h₂ : _root_.cmp (n₁ : ℕ) n₂ <;> intro h <;> try cases h
obtain rfl := eq_of_cmp_eq h
rw [_root_.cmp, cmpUsing_eq_eq] at h₂
obtain rfl := Subtype.eq (eq_of_incomp h₂)
simp
#align onote.eq_of_cmp_eq ONote.eq_of_cmp_eq
protected theorem zero_lt_one : (0 : ONote) < 1 := by
simp only [lt_def, repr, opow_zero, Nat.succPNat_coe, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, add_zero,
zero_lt_one]
#align onote.zero_lt_one ONote.zero_lt_one
inductive NFBelow : ONote → Ordinal.{0} → Prop
| zero {b} : NFBelow 0 b
| oadd' {e n a eb b} : NFBelow e eb → NFBelow a (repr e) → repr e < b → NFBelow (oadd e n a) b
#align onote.NF_below ONote.NFBelow
class NF (o : ONote) : Prop where
out : Exists (NFBelow o)
#align onote.NF ONote.NF
instance NF.zero : NF 0 :=
⟨⟨0, NFBelow.zero⟩⟩
#align onote.NF.zero ONote.NF.zero
theorem NFBelow.oadd {e n a b} : NF e → NFBelow a (repr e) → repr e < b → NFBelow (oadd e n a) b
| ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩ => NFBelow.oadd' h
#align onote.NF_below.oadd ONote.NFBelow.oadd
theorem NFBelow.fst {e n a b} (h : NFBelow (ONote.oadd e n a) b) : NF e := by
cases' h with _ _ _ _ eb _ h₁ h₂ h₃; exact ⟨⟨_, h₁⟩⟩
#align onote.NF_below.fst ONote.NFBelow.fst
theorem NF.fst {e n a} : NF (oadd e n a) → NF e
| ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩ => h.fst
#align onote.NF.fst ONote.NF.fst
theorem NFBelow.snd {e n a b} (h : NFBelow (ONote.oadd e n a) b) : NFBelow a (repr e) := by
cases' h with _ _ _ _ eb _ h₁ h₂ h₃; exact h₂
#align onote.NF_below.snd ONote.NFBelow.snd
theorem NF.snd' {e n a} : NF (oadd e n a) → NFBelow a (repr e)
| ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩ => h.snd
#align onote.NF.snd' ONote.NF.snd'
theorem NF.snd {e n a} (h : NF (oadd e n a)) : NF a :=
⟨⟨_, h.snd'⟩⟩
#align onote.NF.snd ONote.NF.snd
theorem NF.oadd {e a} (h₁ : NF e) (n) (h₂ : NFBelow a (repr e)) : NF (oadd e n a) :=
⟨⟨_, NFBelow.oadd h₁ h₂ (lt_succ _)⟩⟩
#align onote.NF.oadd ONote.NF.oadd
instance NF.oadd_zero (e n) [h : NF e] : NF (ONote.oadd e n 0) :=
h.oadd _ NFBelow.zero
#align onote.NF.oadd_zero ONote.NF.oadd_zero
theorem NFBelow.lt {e n a b} (h : NFBelow (ONote.oadd e n a) b) : repr e < b := by
cases' h with _ _ _ _ eb _ h₁ h₂ h₃; exact h₃
#align onote.NF_below.lt ONote.NFBelow.lt
theorem NFBelow_zero : ∀ {o}, NFBelow o 0 ↔ o = 0
| 0 => ⟨fun _ => rfl, fun _ => NFBelow.zero⟩
| oadd _ _ _ =>
⟨fun h => (not_le_of_lt h.lt).elim (Ordinal.zero_le _), fun e => e.symm ▸ NFBelow.zero⟩
#align onote.NF_below_zero ONote.NFBelow_zero
theorem NF.zero_of_zero {e n a} (h : NF (ONote.oadd e n a)) (e0 : e = 0) : a = 0 := by
simpa [e0, NFBelow_zero] using h.snd'
#align onote.NF.zero_of_zero ONote.NF.zero_of_zero
theorem NFBelow.repr_lt {o b} (h : NFBelow o b) : repr o < ω ^ b := by
induction' h with _ e n a eb b h₁ h₂ h₃ _ IH
· exact opow_pos _ omega_pos
· rw [repr]
apply ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 IH).trans_le
rw [← mul_succ]
apply (mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_of_lt (nat_lt_omega _)) _).trans
rw [← opow_succ]
exact opow_le_opow_right omega_pos (succ_le_of_lt h₃)
#align onote.NF_below.repr_lt ONote.NFBelow.repr_lt
theorem NFBelow.mono {o b₁ b₂} (bb : b₁ ≤ b₂) (h : NFBelow o b₁) : NFBelow o b₂ := by
induction' h with _ e n a eb b h₁ h₂ h₃ _ _ <;> constructor
exacts [h₁, h₂, lt_of_lt_of_le h₃ bb]
#align onote.NF_below.mono ONote.NFBelow.mono
theorem NF.below_of_lt {e n a b} (H : repr e < b) :
NF (ONote.oadd e n a) → NFBelow (ONote.oadd e n a) b
| ⟨⟨b', h⟩⟩ => by (cases' h with _ _ _ _ eb _ h₁ h₂ h₃; exact NFBelow.oadd' h₁ h₂ H)
#align onote.NF.below_of_lt ONote.NF.below_of_lt
theorem NF.below_of_lt' : ∀ {o b}, repr o < ω ^ b → NF o → NFBelow o b
| 0, _, _, _ => NFBelow.zero
| ONote.oadd _ _ _, _, H, h =>
h.below_of_lt <|
(opow_lt_opow_iff_right one_lt_omega).1 <| lt_of_le_of_lt (omega_le_oadd _ _ _) H
#align onote.NF.below_of_lt' ONote.NF.below_of_lt'
theorem nfBelow_ofNat : ∀ n, NFBelow (ofNat n) 1
| 0 => NFBelow.zero
| Nat.succ _ => NFBelow.oadd NF.zero NFBelow.zero zero_lt_one
#align onote.NF_below_of_nat ONote.nfBelow_ofNat
instance nf_ofNat (n) : NF (ofNat n) :=
⟨⟨_, nfBelow_ofNat n⟩⟩
#align onote.NF_of_nat ONote.nf_ofNat
instance nf_one : NF 1 := by rw [← ofNat_one]; infer_instance
#align onote.NF_one ONote.nf_one
theorem oadd_lt_oadd_1 {e₁ n₁ o₁ e₂ n₂ o₂} (h₁ : NF (oadd e₁ n₁ o₁)) (h : e₁ < e₂) :
oadd e₁ n₁ o₁ < oadd e₂ n₂ o₂ :=
@lt_of_lt_of_le _ _ (repr (oadd e₁ n₁ o₁)) _ _
(NF.below_of_lt h h₁).repr_lt (omega_le_oadd e₂ n₂ o₂)
#align onote.oadd_lt_oadd_1 ONote.oadd_lt_oadd_1
theorem oadd_lt_oadd_2 {e o₁ o₂ : ONote} {n₁ n₂ : ℕ+} (h₁ : NF (oadd e n₁ o₁)) (h : (n₁ : ℕ) < n₂) :
oadd e n₁ o₁ < oadd e n₂ o₂ := by
simp only [lt_def, repr]
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 h₁.snd'.repr_lt) (le_trans ?_ (le_add_right _ _))
rwa [← mul_succ,Ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left (opow_pos _ omega_pos), succ_le_iff, natCast_lt]
#align onote.oadd_lt_oadd_2 ONote.oadd_lt_oadd_2
theorem oadd_lt_oadd_3 {e n a₁ a₂} (h : a₁ < a₂) : oadd e n a₁ < oadd e n a₂ := by
rw [lt_def]; unfold repr
exact @add_lt_add_left _ _ _ _ (repr a₁) _ h _
#align onote.oadd_lt_oadd_3 ONote.oadd_lt_oadd_3
theorem cmp_compares : ∀ (a b : ONote) [NF a] [NF b], (cmp a b).Compares a b
| 0, 0, _, _ => rfl
| oadd e n a, 0, _, _ => oadd_pos _ _ _
| 0, oadd e n a, _, _ => oadd_pos _ _ _
| o₁@(oadd e₁ n₁ a₁), o₂@(oadd e₂ n₂ a₂), h₁, h₂ => by -- TODO: golf
rw [cmp]
have IHe := @cmp_compares _ _ h₁.fst h₂.fst
simp only [Ordering.Compares, gt_iff_lt] at IHe; revert IHe
cases cmp e₁ e₂
case lt => intro IHe; exact oadd_lt_oadd_1 h₁ IHe
case gt => intro IHe; exact oadd_lt_oadd_1 h₂ IHe
case eq =>
intro IHe; dsimp at IHe; subst IHe
unfold _root_.cmp; cases nh : cmpUsing (· < ·) (n₁ : ℕ) n₂ <;>
rw [cmpUsing, ite_eq_iff, not_lt] at nh
case lt =>
cases' nh with nh nh
· exact oadd_lt_oadd_2 h₁ nh.left
· rw [ite_eq_iff] at nh; cases' nh.right with nh nh <;> cases nh <;> contradiction
case gt =>
cases' nh with nh nh
· cases nh; contradiction
· cases' nh with _ nh
rw [ite_eq_iff] at nh; cases' nh with nh nh
· exact oadd_lt_oadd_2 h₂ nh.left
· cases nh; contradiction
cases' nh with nh nh
· cases nh; contradiction
cases' nh with nhl nhr
rw [ite_eq_iff] at nhr
cases' nhr with nhr nhr
· cases nhr; contradiction
obtain rfl := Subtype.eq (eq_of_incomp ⟨(not_lt_of_ge nhl), nhr.left⟩)
have IHa := @cmp_compares _ _ h₁.snd h₂.snd
revert IHa; cases cmp a₁ a₂ <;> intro IHa <;> dsimp at IHa
case lt => exact oadd_lt_oadd_3 IHa
case gt => exact oadd_lt_oadd_3 IHa
subst IHa; exact rfl
#align onote.cmp_compares ONote.cmp_compares
theorem repr_inj {a b} [NF a] [NF b] : repr a = repr b ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun e => match cmp a b, cmp_compares a b with
| Ordering.lt, (h : repr a < repr b) => (ne_of_lt h e).elim
| Ordering.gt, (h : repr a > repr b)=> (ne_of_gt h e).elim
| Ordering.eq, h => h,
congr_arg _⟩
#align onote.repr_inj ONote.repr_inj
theorem NF.of_dvd_omega_opow {b e n a} (h : NF (ONote.oadd e n a))
(d : ω ^ b ∣ repr (ONote.oadd e n a)) :
b ≤ repr e ∧ ω ^ b ∣ repr a := by
have := mt repr_inj.1 (fun h => by injection h : ONote.oadd e n a ≠ 0)
have L := le_of_not_lt fun l => not_le_of_lt (h.below_of_lt l).repr_lt (le_of_dvd this d)
simp only [repr] at d
exact ⟨L, (dvd_add_iff <| (opow_dvd_opow _ L).mul_right _).1 d⟩
#align onote.NF.of_dvd_omega_opow ONote.NF.of_dvd_omega_opow
theorem NF.of_dvd_omega {e n a} (h : NF (ONote.oadd e n a)) :
ω ∣ repr (ONote.oadd e n a) → repr e ≠ 0 ∧ ω ∣ repr a := by
(rw [← opow_one ω, ← one_le_iff_ne_zero]; exact h.of_dvd_omega_opow)
#align onote.NF.of_dvd_omega ONote.NF.of_dvd_omega
def TopBelow (b : ONote) : ONote → Prop
| 0 => True
| oadd e _ _ => cmp e b = Ordering.lt
#align onote.top_below ONote.TopBelow
instance decidableTopBelow : DecidableRel TopBelow := by
intro b o
cases o <;> delta TopBelow <;> infer_instance
#align onote.decidable_top_below ONote.decidableTopBelow
theorem nfBelow_iff_topBelow {b} [NF b] : ∀ {o}, NFBelow o (repr b) ↔ NF o ∧ TopBelow b o
| 0 => ⟨fun h => ⟨⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩, trivial⟩, fun _ => NFBelow.zero⟩
| oadd _ _ _ =>
⟨fun h => ⟨⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩, (@cmp_compares _ b h.fst _).eq_lt.2 h.lt⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ =>
h₁.below_of_lt <| (@cmp_compares _ b h₁.fst _).eq_lt.1 h₂⟩
#align onote.NF_below_iff_top_below ONote.nfBelow_iff_topBelow
instance decidableNF : DecidablePred NF
| 0 => isTrue NF.zero
| oadd e n a => by
have := decidableNF e
have := decidableNF a
apply decidable_of_iff (NF e ∧ NF a ∧ TopBelow e a)
rw [← and_congr_right fun h => @nfBelow_iff_topBelow _ h _]
exact ⟨fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => NF.oadd h₁ n h₂, fun h => ⟨h.fst, h.snd'⟩⟩
#align onote.decidable_NF ONote.decidableNF
def addAux (e : ONote) (n : ℕ+) (o : ONote) : ONote :=
match o with
| 0 => oadd e n 0
| o'@(oadd e' n' a') =>
match cmp e e' with
| Ordering.lt => o'
| Ordering.eq => oadd e (n + n') a'
| Ordering.gt => oadd e n o'
def add : ONote → ONote → ONote
| 0, o => o
| oadd e n a, o => addAux e n (add a o)
#align onote.add ONote.add
instance : Add ONote :=
⟨add⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_add (o : ONote) : 0 + o = o :=
rfl
#align onote.zero_add ONote.zero_add
theorem oadd_add (e n a o) : oadd e n a + o = addAux e n (a + o) :=
rfl
#align onote.oadd_add ONote.oadd_add
def sub : ONote → ONote → ONote
| 0, _ => 0
| o, 0 => o
| o₁@(oadd e₁ n₁ a₁), oadd e₂ n₂ a₂ =>
match cmp e₁ e₂ with
| Ordering.lt => 0
| Ordering.gt => o₁
| Ordering.eq =>
match (n₁ : ℕ) - n₂ with
| 0 => if n₁ = n₂ then sub a₁ a₂ else 0
| Nat.succ k => oadd e₁ k.succPNat a₁
#align onote.sub ONote.sub
instance : Sub ONote :=
⟨sub⟩
theorem add_nfBelow {b} : ∀ {o₁ o₂}, NFBelow o₁ b → NFBelow o₂ b → NFBelow (o₁ + o₂) b
| 0, _, _, h₂ => h₂
| oadd e n a, o, h₁, h₂ => by
have h' := add_nfBelow (h₁.snd.mono <| le_of_lt h₁.lt) h₂
simp [oadd_add]; revert h'; cases' a + o with e' n' a' <;> intro h'
· exact NFBelow.oadd h₁.fst NFBelow.zero h₁.lt
have : ((e.cmp e').Compares e e') := @cmp_compares _ _ h₁.fst h'.fst
cases h: cmp e e' <;> dsimp [addAux] <;> simp [h]
· exact h'
· simp [h] at this
subst e'
exact NFBelow.oadd h'.fst h'.snd h'.lt
· simp [h] at this
exact NFBelow.oadd h₁.fst (NF.below_of_lt this ⟨⟨_, h'⟩⟩) h₁.lt
#align onote.add_NF_below ONote.add_nfBelow
instance add_nf (o₁ o₂) : ∀ [NF o₁] [NF o₂], NF (o₁ + o₂)
| ⟨⟨b₁, h₁⟩⟩, ⟨⟨b₂, h₂⟩⟩ =>
⟨(le_total b₁ b₂).elim (fun h => ⟨b₂, add_nfBelow (h₁.mono h) h₂⟩) fun h =>
⟨b₁, add_nfBelow h₁ (h₂.mono h)⟩⟩
#align onote.add_NF ONote.add_nf
@[simp]
theorem repr_add : ∀ (o₁ o₂) [NF o₁] [NF o₂], repr (o₁ + o₂) = repr o₁ + repr o₂
| 0, o, _, _ => by simp
| oadd e n a, o, h₁, h₂ => by
haveI := h₁.snd; have h' := repr_add a o
conv_lhs at h' => simp [HAdd.hAdd, Add.add]
have nf := ONote.add_nf a o
conv at nf => simp [HAdd.hAdd, Add.add]
conv in _ + o => simp [HAdd.hAdd, Add.add]
cases' h : add a o with e' n' a' <;>
simp only [Add.add, add, addAux, h'.symm, h, add_assoc, repr] at nf h₁ ⊢
have := h₁.fst; haveI := nf.fst; have ee := cmp_compares e e'
cases he: cmp e e' <;> simp only [he, Ordering.compares_gt, Ordering.compares_lt,
Ordering.compares_eq, repr, gt_iff_lt, PNat.add_coe, Nat.cast_add] at ee ⊢
· rw [← add_assoc, @add_absorp _ (repr e') (ω ^ repr e' * (n' : ℕ))]
· have := (h₁.below_of_lt ee).repr_lt
unfold repr at this
cases he': e' <;> simp only [he', zero_def, opow_zero, repr, gt_iff_lt] at this ⊢ <;>
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (le_add_right _ _) this
· simpa using (Ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left <| opow_pos (repr e') omega_pos).2
(natCast_le.2 n'.pos)
· rw [ee, ← add_assoc, ← mul_add]
#align onote.repr_add ONote.repr_add
theorem sub_nfBelow : ∀ {o₁ o₂ b}, NFBelow o₁ b → NF o₂ → NFBelow (o₁ - o₂) b
| 0, o, b, _, h₂ => by cases o <;> exact NFBelow.zero
| oadd _ _ _, 0, _, h₁, _ => h₁
| oadd e₁ n₁ a₁, oadd e₂ n₂ a₂, b, h₁, h₂ => by
have h' := sub_nfBelow h₁.snd h₂.snd
simp only [HSub.hSub, Sub.sub, sub] at h' ⊢
have := @cmp_compares _ _ h₁.fst h₂.fst
cases h : cmp e₁ e₂ <;> simp [sub]
· apply NFBelow.zero
· simp only [h, Ordering.compares_eq] at this
subst e₂
cases (n₁ : ℕ) - n₂ <;> simp [sub]
· by_cases en : n₁ = n₂ <;> simp [en]
· exact h'.mono (le_of_lt h₁.lt)
· exact NFBelow.zero
· exact NFBelow.oadd h₁.fst h₁.snd h₁.lt
· exact h₁
#align onote.sub_NF_below ONote.sub_nfBelow
instance sub_nf (o₁ o₂) : ∀ [NF o₁] [NF o₂], NF (o₁ - o₂)
| ⟨⟨b₁, h₁⟩⟩, h₂ => ⟨⟨b₁, sub_nfBelow h₁ h₂⟩⟩
#align onote.sub_NF ONote.sub_nf
@[simp]
theorem repr_sub : ∀ (o₁ o₂) [NF o₁] [NF o₂], repr (o₁ - o₂) = repr o₁ - repr o₂
| 0, o, _, h₂ => by cases o <;> exact (Ordinal.zero_sub _).symm
| oadd e n a, 0, _, _ => (Ordinal.sub_zero _).symm
| oadd e₁ n₁ a₁, oadd e₂ n₂ a₂, h₁, h₂ => by
haveI := h₁.snd; haveI := h₂.snd; have h' := repr_sub a₁ a₂
conv_lhs at h' => dsimp [HSub.hSub, Sub.sub, sub]
conv_lhs => dsimp only [HSub.hSub, Sub.sub]; dsimp only [sub]
have ee := @cmp_compares _ _ h₁.fst h₂.fst
cases h : cmp e₁ e₂ <;> simp only [h] at ee
· rw [Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2]
· rfl
exact le_of_lt (oadd_lt_oadd_1 h₁ ee)
· change e₁ = e₂ at ee
subst e₂
dsimp only
cases mn : (n₁ : ℕ) - n₂ <;> dsimp only
· by_cases en : n₁ = n₂
· simpa [en]
· simp only [en, ite_false]
exact
(Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 <|
le_of_lt <|
oadd_lt_oadd_2 h₁ <|
lt_of_le_of_ne (tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.1 mn) (mt PNat.eq en)).symm
· simp [Nat.succPNat]
rw [(tsub_eq_iff_eq_add_of_le <| le_of_lt <| Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ mn).1 mn, add_comm,
Nat.cast_add, mul_add, add_assoc, add_sub_add_cancel]
refine
(Ordinal.sub_eq_of_add_eq <|
add_absorp h₂.snd'.repr_lt <| le_trans ?_ (le_add_right _ _)).symm
simpa using mul_le_mul_left' (natCast_le.2 <| Nat.succ_pos _) _
· exact
(Ordinal.sub_eq_of_add_eq <|
add_absorp (h₂.below_of_lt ee).repr_lt <| omega_le_oadd _ _ _).symm
#align onote.repr_sub ONote.repr_sub
def mul : ONote → ONote → ONote
| 0, _ => 0
| _, 0 => 0
| o₁@(oadd e₁ n₁ a₁), oadd e₂ n₂ a₂ =>
if e₂ = 0 then oadd e₁ (n₁ * n₂) a₁ else oadd (e₁ + e₂) n₂ (mul o₁ a₂)
#align onote.mul ONote.mul
instance : Mul ONote :=
⟨mul⟩
instance : MulZeroClass ONote where
mul := (· * ·)
zero := 0
zero_mul o := by cases o <;> rfl
mul_zero o := by cases o <;> rfl
theorem oadd_mul (e₁ n₁ a₁ e₂ n₂ a₂) :
oadd e₁ n₁ a₁ * oadd e₂ n₂ a₂ =
if e₂ = 0 then oadd e₁ (n₁ * n₂) a₁ else oadd (e₁ + e₂) n₂ (oadd e₁ n₁ a₁ * a₂) :=
rfl
#align onote.oadd_mul ONote.oadd_mul
theorem oadd_mul_nfBelow {e₁ n₁ a₁ b₁} (h₁ : NFBelow (oadd e₁ n₁ a₁) b₁) :
∀ {o₂ b₂}, NFBelow o₂ b₂ → NFBelow (oadd e₁ n₁ a₁ * o₂) (repr e₁ + b₂)
| 0, b₂, _ => NFBelow.zero
| oadd e₂ n₂ a₂, b₂, h₂ => by
have IH := oadd_mul_nfBelow h₁ h₂.snd
by_cases e0 : e₂ = 0 <;> simp [e0, oadd_mul]
· apply NFBelow.oadd h₁.fst h₁.snd
simpa using (add_lt_add_iff_left (repr e₁)).2 (lt_of_le_of_lt (Ordinal.zero_le _) h₂.lt)
· haveI := h₁.fst
haveI := h₂.fst
apply NFBelow.oadd
· infer_instance
· rwa [repr_add]
· rw [repr_add, add_lt_add_iff_left]
exact h₂.lt
#align onote.oadd_mul_NF_below ONote.oadd_mul_nfBelow
instance mul_nf : ∀ (o₁ o₂) [NF o₁] [NF o₂], NF (o₁ * o₂)
| 0, o, _, h₂ => by cases o <;> exact NF.zero
| oadd e n a, o, ⟨⟨b₁, hb₁⟩⟩, ⟨⟨b₂, hb₂⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨_, oadd_mul_nfBelow hb₁ hb₂⟩⟩
#align onote.mul_NF ONote.mul_nf
@[simp]
theorem repr_mul : ∀ (o₁ o₂) [NF o₁] [NF o₂], repr (o₁ * o₂) = repr o₁ * repr o₂
| 0, o, _, h₂ => by cases o <;> exact (zero_mul _).symm
| oadd e₁ n₁ a₁, 0, _, _ => (mul_zero _).symm
| oadd e₁ n₁ a₁, oadd e₂ n₂ a₂, h₁, h₂ => by
have IH : repr (mul _ _) = _ := @repr_mul _ _ h₁ h₂.snd
conv =>
lhs
simp [(· * ·)]
have ao : repr a₁ + ω ^ repr e₁ * (n₁ : ℕ) = ω ^ repr e₁ * (n₁ : ℕ) := by
apply add_absorp h₁.snd'.repr_lt
simpa using (Ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left <| opow_pos _ omega_pos).2 (natCast_le.2 n₁.2)
by_cases e0 : e₂ = 0 <;> simp [e0, mul]
· cases' Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero n₂.ne_zero with x xe
simp only [xe, h₂.zero_of_zero e0, repr, add_zero]
rw [natCast_succ x, add_mul_succ _ ao, mul_assoc]
· haveI := h₁.fst
haveI := h₂.fst
simp only [Mul.mul, mul, e0, ite_false, repr.eq_2, repr_add, opow_add, IH, repr, mul_add]
rw [← mul_assoc]
congr 2
have := mt repr_inj.1 e0
rw [add_mul_limit ao (opow_isLimit_left omega_isLimit this), mul_assoc,
mul_omega_dvd (natCast_pos.2 n₁.pos) (nat_lt_omega _)]
simpa using opow_dvd_opow ω (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 this)
#align onote.repr_mul ONote.repr_mul
def split' : ONote → ONote × ℕ
| 0 => (0, 0)
| oadd e n a =>
if e = 0 then (0, n)
else
let (a', m) := split' a
(oadd (e - 1) n a', m)
#align onote.split' ONote.split'
def split : ONote → ONote × ℕ
| 0 => (0, 0)
| oadd e n a =>
if e = 0 then (0, n)
else
let (a', m) := split a
(oadd e n a', m)
#align onote.split ONote.split
def scale (x : ONote) : ONote → ONote
| 0 => 0
| oadd e n a => oadd (x + e) n (scale x a)
#align onote.scale ONote.scale
def mulNat : ONote → ℕ → ONote
| 0, _ => 0
| _, 0 => 0
| oadd e n a, m + 1 => oadd e (n * m.succPNat) a
#align onote.mul_nat ONote.mulNat
def opowAux (e a0 a : ONote) : ℕ → ℕ → ONote
| _, 0 => 0
| 0, m + 1 => oadd e m.succPNat 0
| k + 1, m => scale (e + mulNat a0 k) a + (opowAux e a0 a k m)
#align onote.opow_aux ONote.opowAux
def opowAux2 (o₂ : ONote) (o₁ : ONote × ℕ) : ONote :=
match o₁ with
| (0, 0) => if o₂ = 0 then 1 else 0
| (0, 1) => 1
| (0, m + 1) =>
let (b', k) := split' o₂
oadd b' (m.succPNat ^ k) 0
| (a@(oadd a0 _ _), m) =>
match split o₂ with
| (b, 0) => oadd (a0 * b) 1 0
| (b, k + 1) =>
let eb := a0 * b
scale (eb + mulNat a0 k) a + opowAux eb a0 (mulNat a m) k m
def opow (o₁ o₂ : ONote) : ONote := opowAux2 o₂ (split o₁)
#align onote.opow ONote.opow
instance : Pow ONote ONote :=
⟨opow⟩
theorem opow_def (o₁ o₂ : ONote) : o₁ ^ o₂ = opowAux2 o₂ (split o₁) :=
rfl
#align onote.opow_def ONote.opow_def
theorem split_eq_scale_split' : ∀ {o o' m} [NF o], split' o = (o', m) → split o = (scale 1 o', m)
| 0, o', m, _, p => by injection p; substs o' m; rfl
| oadd e n a, o', m, h, p => by
by_cases e0 : e = 0 <;> simp [e0, split, split'] at p ⊢
· rcases p with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
· revert p
cases' h' : split' a with a' m'
haveI := h.fst
haveI := h.snd
simp only [split_eq_scale_split' h', and_imp]
have : 1 + (e - 1) = e := by
refine repr_inj.1 ?_
simp only [repr_add, repr, opow_zero, Nat.succPNat_coe, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, add_zero,
repr_sub]
have := mt repr_inj.1 e0
refine Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le ?_
have := one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 this
exact this
intros
substs o' m
simp [scale, this]
#align onote.split_eq_scale_split' ONote.split_eq_scale_split'
theorem nf_repr_split' : ∀ {o o' m} [NF o], split' o = (o', m) → NF o' ∧ repr o = ω * repr o' + m
| 0, o', m, _, p => by injection p; substs o' m; simp [NF.zero]
| oadd e n a, o', m, h, p => by
by_cases e0 : e = 0 <;> simp [e0, split, split'] at p ⊢
· rcases p with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
simp [h.zero_of_zero e0, NF.zero]
· revert p
cases' h' : split' a with a' m'
haveI := h.fst
haveI := h.snd
cases' nf_repr_split' h' with IH₁ IH₂
simp only [IH₂, and_imp]
intros
substs o' m
have : (ω : Ordinal.{0}) ^ repr e = ω ^ (1 : Ordinal.{0}) * ω ^ (repr e - 1) := by
have := mt repr_inj.1 e0
rw [← opow_add, Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 this)]
refine ⟨NF.oadd (by infer_instance) _ ?_, ?_⟩
· simp at this ⊢
refine
IH₁.below_of_lt'
((Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left omega_pos).1 <| lt_of_le_of_lt (le_add_right _ m') ?_)
rw [← this, ← IH₂]
exact h.snd'.repr_lt
· rw [this]
simp [mul_add, mul_assoc, add_assoc]
#align onote.NF_repr_split' ONote.nf_repr_split'
theorem scale_eq_mul (x) [NF x] : ∀ (o) [NF o], scale x o = oadd x 1 0 * o
| 0, _ => rfl
| oadd e n a, h => by
simp only [HMul.hMul]; simp only [scale]
haveI := h.snd
by_cases e0 : e = 0
· simp_rw [scale_eq_mul]
simp [Mul.mul, mul, scale_eq_mul, e0, h.zero_of_zero,
show x + 0 = x from repr_inj.1 (by simp)]
· simp [e0, Mul.mul, mul, scale_eq_mul, (· * ·)]
#align onote.scale_eq_mul ONote.scale_eq_mul
instance nf_scale (x) [NF x] (o) [NF o] : NF (scale x o) := by
rw [scale_eq_mul]
infer_instance
#align onote.NF_scale ONote.nf_scale
@[simp]
theorem repr_scale (x) [NF x] (o) [NF o] : repr (scale x o) = ω ^ repr x * repr o := by
simp only [scale_eq_mul, repr_mul, repr, PNat.one_coe, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, add_zero]
#align onote.repr_scale ONote.repr_scale
theorem nf_repr_split {o o' m} [NF o] (h : split o = (o', m)) : NF o' ∧ repr o = repr o' + m := by
cases' e : split' o with a n
cases' nf_repr_split' e with s₁ s₂
rw [split_eq_scale_split' e] at h
injection h; substs o' n
simp only [repr_scale, repr, opow_zero, Nat.succPNat_coe, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, add_zero,
opow_one, s₂.symm, and_true]
infer_instance
#align onote.NF_repr_split ONote.nf_repr_split
theorem split_dvd {o o' m} [NF o] (h : split o = (o', m)) : ω ∣ repr o' := by
cases' e : split' o with a n
rw [split_eq_scale_split' e] at h
injection h; subst o'
cases nf_repr_split' e; simp
#align onote.split_dvd ONote.split_dvd
theorem split_add_lt {o e n a m} [NF o] (h : split o = (oadd e n a, m)) :
repr a + m < ω ^ repr e := by
cases' nf_repr_split h with h₁ h₂
cases' h₁.of_dvd_omega (split_dvd h) with e0 d
apply principal_add_omega_opow _ h₁.snd'.repr_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le (nat_lt_omega _) _)
simpa using opow_le_opow_right omega_pos (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 e0)
#align onote.split_add_lt ONote.split_add_lt
@[simp]
theorem mulNat_eq_mul (n o) : mulNat o n = o * ofNat n := by cases o <;> cases n <;> rfl
#align onote.mul_nat_eq_mul ONote.mulNat_eq_mul
instance nf_mulNat (o) [NF o] (n) : NF (mulNat o n) := by simp; exact ONote.mul_nf o (ofNat n)
#align onote.NF_mul_nat ONote.nf_mulNat
instance nf_opowAux (e a0 a) [NF e] [NF a0] [NF a] : ∀ k m, NF (opowAux e a0 a k m) := by
intro k m
unfold opowAux
cases' m with m m
· cases k <;> exact NF.zero
cases' k with k k
· exact NF.oadd_zero _ _
· haveI := nf_opowAux e a0 a k
simp only [Nat.succ_ne_zero m, IsEmpty.forall_iff, mulNat_eq_mul]; infer_instance
#align onote.NF_opow_aux ONote.nf_opowAux
instance nf_opow (o₁ o₂) [NF o₁] [NF o₂] : NF (o₁ ^ o₂) := by
cases' e₁ : split o₁ with a m
have na := (nf_repr_split e₁).1
cases' e₂ : split' o₂ with b' k
haveI := (nf_repr_split' e₂).1
cases' a with a0 n a'
· cases' m with m
· by_cases o₂ = 0 <;> simp only [(· ^ ·), Pow.pow, pow, opow, opowAux2, *] <;> decide
· by_cases m = 0
· simp only [(· ^ ·), Pow.pow, pow, opow, opowAux2, *, zero_def]
decide
· simp only [(· ^ ·), Pow.pow, pow, opow, opowAux2, mulNat_eq_mul, ofNat, *]
infer_instance
· simp [(· ^ ·),Pow.pow,pow, opow, opowAux2, e₁, e₂, split_eq_scale_split' e₂]
have := na.fst
cases' k with k <;> simp
· infer_instance
· cases k <;> cases m <;> infer_instance
#align onote.NF_opow ONote.nf_opow
theorem scale_opowAux (e a0 a : ONote) [NF e] [NF a0] [NF a] :
∀ k m, repr (opowAux e a0 a k m) = ω ^ repr e * repr (opowAux 0 a0 a k m)
| 0, m => by cases m <;> simp [opowAux]
| k + 1, m => by
by_cases h : m = 0
· simp [h, opowAux, mul_add, opow_add, mul_assoc, scale_opowAux _ _ _ k]
· -- Porting note: rewrote proof
rw [opowAux]; swap
· assumption
rw [opowAux]; swap
· assumption
rw [repr_add, repr_scale, scale_opowAux _ _ _ k]
simp only [repr_add, repr_scale, opow_add, mul_assoc, zero_add, mul_add]
#align onote.scale_opow_aux ONote.scale_opowAux
theorem repr_opow_aux₁ {e a} [Ne : NF e] [Na : NF a] {a' : Ordinal} (e0 : repr e ≠ 0)
(h : a' < (ω : Ordinal.{0}) ^ repr e) (aa : repr a = a') (n : ℕ+) :
((ω : Ordinal.{0}) ^ repr e * (n : ℕ) + a') ^ (ω : Ordinal.{0}) =
(ω ^ repr e) ^ (ω : Ordinal.{0}) := by
subst aa
have No := Ne.oadd n (Na.below_of_lt' h)
have := omega_le_oadd e n a
rw [repr] at this
refine le_antisymm ?_ (opow_le_opow_left _ this)
apply (opow_le_of_limit ((opow_pos _ omega_pos).trans_le this).ne' omega_isLimit).2
intro b l
have := (No.below_of_lt (lt_succ _)).repr_lt
rw [repr] at this
apply (opow_le_opow_left b <| this.le).trans
rw [← opow_mul, ← opow_mul]
apply opow_le_opow_right omega_pos
rcases le_or_lt ω (repr e) with h | h
· apply (mul_le_mul_left' (le_succ b) _).trans
rw [← add_one_eq_succ, add_mul_succ _ (one_add_of_omega_le h), add_one_eq_succ, succ_le_iff,
Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 e0)]
exact omega_isLimit.2 _ l
· apply (principal_mul_omega (omega_isLimit.2 _ h) l).le.trans
simpa using mul_le_mul_right' (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 e0) ω
#align onote.repr_opow_aux₁ ONote.repr_opow_aux₁
section
-- Porting note: `R'` is used in the proof but marked as an unused variable.
set_option linter.unusedVariables false in
theorem repr_opow_aux₂ {a0 a'} [N0 : NF a0] [Na' : NF a'] (m : ℕ) (d : ω ∣ repr a')
(e0 : repr a0 ≠ 0) (h : repr a' + m < (ω ^ repr a0)) (n : ℕ+) (k : ℕ) :
let R := repr (opowAux 0 a0 (oadd a0 n a' * ofNat m) k m)
(k ≠ 0 → R < ((ω ^ repr a0) ^ succ (k : Ordinal))) ∧
((ω ^ repr a0) ^ (k : Ordinal)) * ((ω ^ repr a0) * (n : ℕ) + repr a') + R =
((ω ^ repr a0) * (n : ℕ) + repr a' + m) ^ succ (k : Ordinal) := by
intro R'
haveI No : NF (oadd a0 n a') :=
N0.oadd n (Na'.below_of_lt' <| lt_of_le_of_lt (le_add_right _ _) h)
induction' k with k IH
· cases m <;> simp [R', opowAux]
-- rename R => R'
let R := repr (opowAux 0 a0 (oadd a0 n a' * ofNat m) k m)
let ω0 := ω ^ repr a0
let α' := ω0 * n + repr a'
change (k ≠ 0 → R < (ω0 ^ succ (k : Ordinal))) ∧ (ω0 ^ (k : Ordinal)) * α' + R
= (α' + m) ^ (succ ↑k : Ordinal) at IH
have RR : R' = ω0 ^ (k : Ordinal) * (α' * m) + R := by
by_cases h : m = 0
· simp only [R, R', h, ONote.ofNat, Nat.cast_zero, zero_add, ONote.repr, mul_zero,
ONote.opowAux, add_zero]
· simp only [R', ONote.repr_scale, ONote.repr, ONote.mulNat_eq_mul, ONote.opowAux,
ONote.repr_ofNat, ONote.repr_mul, ONote.repr_add, Ordinal.opow_mul, ONote.zero_add]
have α0 : 0 < α' := by simpa [lt_def, repr] using oadd_pos a0 n a'
have ω00 : 0 < ω0 ^ (k : Ordinal) := opow_pos _ (opow_pos _ omega_pos)
have Rl : R < ω ^ (repr a0 * succ ↑k) := by
by_cases k0 : k = 0
· simp [R, k0]
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ (opow_le_opow_right omega_pos (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 e0))
cases' m with m <;> simp [opowAux, omega_pos]
rw [← add_one_eq_succ, ← Nat.cast_succ]
apply nat_lt_omega
· rw [opow_mul]
exact IH.1 k0
refine ⟨fun _ => ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [RR, ← opow_mul _ _ (succ k.succ)]
have e0 := Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 e0
have rr0 : 0 < repr a0 + repr a0 := lt_of_lt_of_le e0 (le_add_left _ _)
apply principal_add_omega_opow
· simp [opow_mul, opow_add, mul_assoc]
rw [Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left ω00, ← Ordinal.opow_add]
have : _ < ω ^ (repr a0 + repr a0) := (No.below_of_lt ?_).repr_lt
· exact mul_lt_omega_opow rr0 this (nat_lt_omega _)
· simpa using (add_lt_add_iff_left (repr a0)).2 e0
· exact
lt_of_lt_of_le Rl
(opow_le_opow_right omega_pos <|
mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_succ_iff.2 (natCast_le.2 (le_of_lt k.lt_succ_self))) _)
calc
(ω0 ^ (k.succ : Ordinal)) * α' + R'
_ = (ω0 ^ succ (k : Ordinal)) * α' + ((ω0 ^ (k : Ordinal)) * α' * m + R) := by
rw [natCast_succ, RR, ← mul_assoc]
_ = ((ω0 ^ (k : Ordinal)) * α' + R) * α' + ((ω0 ^ (k : Ordinal)) * α' + R) * m := ?_
_ = (α' + m) ^ succ (k.succ : Ordinal) := by rw [← mul_add, natCast_succ, opow_succ, IH.2]
congr 1
· have αd : ω ∣ α' :=
dvd_add (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left (by simpa using opow_dvd_opow ω (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 e0)) _) d
rw [mul_add (ω0 ^ (k : Ordinal)), add_assoc, ← mul_assoc, ← opow_succ,
add_mul_limit _ (isLimit_iff_omega_dvd.2 ⟨ne_of_gt α0, αd⟩), mul_assoc,
@mul_omega_dvd n (natCast_pos.2 n.pos) (nat_lt_omega _) _ αd]
apply @add_absorp _ (repr a0 * succ ↑k)
· refine principal_add_omega_opow _ ?_ Rl
rw [opow_mul, opow_succ, Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left ω00]
exact No.snd'.repr_lt
· have := mul_le_mul_left' (one_le_iff_pos.2 <| natCast_pos.2 n.pos) (ω0 ^ succ (k : Ordinal))
rw [opow_mul]
simpa [-opow_succ]
· cases m
· have : R = 0 := by cases k <;> simp [R, opowAux]
simp [this]
· rw [natCast_succ, add_mul_succ]
apply add_absorp Rl
rw [opow_mul, opow_succ]
apply mul_le_mul_left'
simpa [repr] using omega_le_oadd a0 n a'
#align onote.repr_opow_aux₂ ONote.repr_opow_aux₂
end
theorem repr_opow (o₁ o₂) [NF o₁] [NF o₂] : repr (o₁ ^ o₂) = repr o₁ ^ repr o₂ := by
cases' e₁ : split o₁ with a m
cases' nf_repr_split e₁ with N₁ r₁
cases' a with a0 n a'
· cases' m with m
· by_cases h : o₂ = 0 <;> simp [opow_def, opowAux2, opow, e₁, h, r₁]
have := mt repr_inj.1 h
rw [zero_opow this]
· cases' e₂ : split' o₂ with b' k
cases' nf_repr_split' e₂ with _ r₂
by_cases h : m = 0
· simp [opow_def, opow, e₁, h, r₁, e₂, r₂, ← Nat.one_eq_succ_zero]
simp only [opow_def, opowAux2, opow, e₁, h, r₁, e₂, r₂, repr,
opow_zero, Nat.succPNat_coe, Nat.cast_succ, Nat.cast_zero, _root_.zero_add, mul_one,
add_zero, one_opow, npow_eq_pow]
rw [opow_add, opow_mul, opow_omega, add_one_eq_succ]
· congr
conv_lhs =>
dsimp [(· ^ ·)]
simp [Pow.pow, opow, Ordinal.succ_ne_zero]
· simpa [Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
· rw [← Nat.cast_succ, lt_omega]
exact ⟨_, rfl⟩
· haveI := N₁.fst
haveI := N₁.snd
cases' N₁.of_dvd_omega (split_dvd e₁) with a00 ad
have al := split_add_lt e₁
have aa : repr (a' + ofNat m) = repr a' + m := by
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, ONote.repr_ofNat, ONote.repr_add]
cases' e₂ : split' o₂ with b' k
cases' nf_repr_split' e₂ with _ r₂
simp only [opow_def, opow, e₁, r₁, split_eq_scale_split' e₂, opowAux2, repr]
cases' k with k
· simp [r₂, opow_mul, repr_opow_aux₁ a00 al aa, add_assoc]
· simp? [r₂, opow_add, opow_mul, mul_assoc, add_assoc, -repr] says
simp only [mulNat_eq_mul, repr_add, repr_scale, repr_mul, repr_ofNat, opow_add, opow_mul,
mul_assoc, add_assoc, r₂, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, add_one_eq_succ, opow_succ]
simp only [repr, opow_zero, Nat.succPNat_coe, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, add_zero, opow_one]
rw [repr_opow_aux₁ a00 al aa, scale_opowAux]
simp only [repr_mul, repr_scale, repr, opow_zero, Nat.succPNat_coe, Nat.cast_one, mul_one,
add_zero, opow_one, opow_mul]
rw [← mul_add, ← add_assoc ((ω : Ordinal.{0}) ^ repr a0 * (n : ℕ))]
congr 1
rw [← opow_succ]
exact (repr_opow_aux₂ _ ad a00 al _ _).2
#align onote.repr_opow ONote.repr_opow
def fundamentalSequence : ONote → Sum (Option ONote) (ℕ → ONote)
| zero => Sum.inl none
| oadd a m b =>
match fundamentalSequence b with
| Sum.inr f => Sum.inr fun i => oadd a m (f i)
| Sum.inl (some b') => Sum.inl (some (oadd a m b'))
| Sum.inl none =>
match fundamentalSequence a, m.natPred with
| Sum.inl none, 0 => Sum.inl (some zero)
| Sum.inl none, m + 1 => Sum.inl (some (oadd zero m.succPNat zero))
| Sum.inl (some a'), 0 => Sum.inr fun i => oadd a' i.succPNat zero
| Sum.inl (some a'), m + 1 => Sum.inr fun i => oadd a m.succPNat (oadd a' i.succPNat zero)
| Sum.inr f, 0 => Sum.inr fun i => oadd (f i) 1 zero
| Sum.inr f, m + 1 => Sum.inr fun i => oadd a m.succPNat (oadd (f i) 1 zero)
#align onote.fundamental_sequence ONote.fundamentalSequence
private theorem exists_lt_add {α} [hα : Nonempty α] {o : Ordinal} {f : α → Ordinal}
(H : ∀ ⦃a⦄, a < o → ∃ i, a < f i) {b : Ordinal} ⦃a⦄ (h : a < b + o) : ∃ i, a < b + f i := by
cases' lt_or_le a b with h h'
· obtain ⟨i⟩ := id hα
exact ⟨i, h.trans_le (le_add_right _ _)⟩
· rw [← Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h', add_lt_add_iff_left] at h
refine (H h).imp fun i H => ?_
rwa [← Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h', add_lt_add_iff_left]
private theorem exists_lt_mul_omega' {o : Ordinal} ⦃a⦄ (h : a < o * ω) :
∃ i : ℕ, a < o * ↑i + o := by
obtain ⟨i, hi, h'⟩ := (lt_mul_of_limit omega_isLimit).1 h
obtain ⟨i, rfl⟩ := lt_omega.1 hi
exact ⟨i, h'.trans_le (le_add_right _ _)⟩
private theorem exists_lt_omega_opow' {α} {o b : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (ho : o.IsLimit)
{f : α → Ordinal} (H : ∀ ⦃a⦄, a < o → ∃ i, a < f i) ⦃a⦄ (h : a < b ^ o) :
∃ i, a < b ^ f i := by
obtain ⟨d, hd, h'⟩ := (lt_opow_of_limit (zero_lt_one.trans hb).ne' ho).1 h
exact (H hd).imp fun i hi => h'.trans <| (opow_lt_opow_iff_right hb).2 hi
def FundamentalSequenceProp (o : ONote) : Sum (Option ONote) (ℕ → ONote) → Prop
| Sum.inl none => o = 0
| Sum.inl (some a) => o.repr = succ a.repr ∧ (o.NF → a.NF)
| Sum.inr f =>
o.repr.IsLimit ∧
(∀ i, f i < f (i + 1) ∧ f i < o ∧ (o.NF → (f i).NF)) ∧ ∀ a, a < o.repr → ∃ i, a < (f i).repr
#align onote.fundamental_sequence_prop ONote.FundamentalSequenceProp
theorem fundamentalSequenceProp_inl_none (o) :
FundamentalSequenceProp o (Sum.inl none) ↔ o = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
theorem fundamentalSequenceProp_inl_some (o a) :
FundamentalSequenceProp o (Sum.inl (some a)) ↔ o.repr = succ a.repr ∧ (o.NF → a.NF) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem fundamentalSequenceProp_inr (o f) :
FundamentalSequenceProp o (Sum.inr f) ↔
o.repr.IsLimit ∧
(∀ i, f i < f (i + 1) ∧ f i < o ∧ (o.NF → (f i).NF)) ∧
∀ a, a < o.repr → ∃ i, a < (f i).repr :=
Iff.rfl
attribute
[eqns
fundamentalSequenceProp_inl_none
fundamentalSequenceProp_inl_some
fundamentalSequenceProp_inr]
FundamentalSequenceProp
theorem fundamentalSequence_has_prop (o) : FundamentalSequenceProp o (fundamentalSequence o) := by
induction' o with a m b iha ihb; · exact rfl
rw [fundamentalSequence]
rcases e : b.fundamentalSequence with (⟨_ | b'⟩ | f) <;>
simp only [FundamentalSequenceProp] <;>
rw [e, FundamentalSequenceProp] at ihb
· rcases e : a.fundamentalSequence with (⟨_ | a'⟩ | f) <;> cases' e' : m.natPred with m' <;>
simp only [FundamentalSequenceProp] <;>
rw [e, FundamentalSequenceProp] at iha <;>
(try rw [show m = 1 by
have := PNat.natPred_add_one m; rw [e'] at this; exact PNat.coe_inj.1 this.symm]) <;>
(try rw [show m = (m' + 1).succPNat by
rw [← e', ← PNat.coe_inj, Nat.succPNat_coe, ← Nat.add_one, PNat.natPred_add_one]]) <;>
simp only [repr, iha, ihb, opow_lt_opow_iff_right one_lt_omega, add_lt_add_iff_left, add_zero,
eq_self_iff_true, lt_add_iff_pos_right, lt_def, mul_one, Nat.cast_zero, Nat.cast_succ,
Nat.succPNat_coe, opow_succ, opow_zero, mul_add_one, PNat.one_coe, succ_zero,
true_and_iff, _root_.zero_add, zero_def]
· decide
· exact ⟨rfl, inferInstance⟩
· have := opow_pos (repr a') omega_pos
refine
⟨mul_isLimit this omega_isLimit, fun i =>
⟨this, ?_, fun H => @NF.oadd_zero _ _ (iha.2 H.fst)⟩, exists_lt_mul_omega'⟩
rw [← mul_succ, ← natCast_succ, Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left this]
apply nat_lt_omega
· have := opow_pos (repr a') omega_pos
refine
⟨add_isLimit _ (mul_isLimit this omega_isLimit), fun i => ⟨this, ?_, ?_⟩,
exists_lt_add exists_lt_mul_omega'⟩
· rw [← mul_succ, ← natCast_succ, Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left this]
apply nat_lt_omega
· refine fun H => H.fst.oadd _ (NF.below_of_lt' ?_ (@NF.oadd_zero _ _ (iha.2 H.fst)))
rw [repr, ← zero_def, repr, add_zero, iha.1, opow_succ, Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left this]
apply nat_lt_omega
· rcases iha with ⟨h1, h2, h3⟩
refine ⟨opow_isLimit one_lt_omega h1, fun i => ?_, exists_lt_omega_opow' one_lt_omega h1 h3⟩
obtain ⟨h4, h5, h6⟩ := h2 i
exact ⟨h4, h5, fun H => @NF.oadd_zero _ _ (h6 H.fst)⟩
· rcases iha with ⟨h1, h2, h3⟩
refine
⟨add_isLimit _ (opow_isLimit one_lt_omega h1), fun i => ?_,
exists_lt_add (exists_lt_omega_opow' one_lt_omega h1 h3)⟩
obtain ⟨h4, h5, h6⟩ := h2 i
refine ⟨h4, h5, fun H => H.fst.oadd _ (NF.below_of_lt' ?_ (@NF.oadd_zero _ _ (h6 H.fst)))⟩
rwa [repr, ← zero_def, repr, add_zero, PNat.one_coe, Nat.cast_one, mul_one,
opow_lt_opow_iff_right one_lt_omega]
· refine ⟨by
rw [repr, ihb.1, add_succ, repr], fun H => H.fst.oadd _ (NF.below_of_lt' ?_ (ihb.2 H.snd))⟩
have := H.snd'.repr_lt
rw [ihb.1] at this
exact (lt_succ _).trans this
· rcases ihb with ⟨h1, h2, h3⟩
simp only [repr]
exact
⟨Ordinal.add_isLimit _ h1, fun i =>
⟨oadd_lt_oadd_3 (h2 i).1, oadd_lt_oadd_3 (h2 i).2.1, fun H =>
H.fst.oadd _ (NF.below_of_lt' (lt_trans (h2 i).2.1 H.snd'.repr_lt) ((h2 i).2.2 H.snd))⟩,
exists_lt_add h3⟩
#align onote.fundamental_sequence_has_prop ONote.fundamentalSequence_has_prop
def fastGrowing : ONote → ℕ → ℕ
| o =>
match fundamentalSequence o, fundamentalSequence_has_prop o with
| Sum.inl none, _ => Nat.succ
| Sum.inl (some a), h =>
have : a < o := by rw [lt_def, h.1]; apply lt_succ
fun i => (fastGrowing a)^[i] i
| Sum.inr f, h => fun i =>
have : f i < o := (h.2.1 i).2.1
fastGrowing (f i) i
termination_by o => o
#align onote.fast_growing ONote.fastGrowing
-- Porting note: the bug of the linter, should be fixed.
@[nolint unusedHavesSuffices]
theorem fastGrowing_def {o : ONote} {x} (e : fundamentalSequence o = x) :
fastGrowing o =
match
(motive := (x : Option ONote ⊕ (ℕ → ONote)) → FundamentalSequenceProp o x → ℕ → ℕ)
x, e ▸ fundamentalSequence_has_prop o with
| Sum.inl none, _ => Nat.succ
| Sum.inl (some a), _ =>
fun i => (fastGrowing a)^[i] i
| Sum.inr f, _ => fun i =>
fastGrowing (f i) i := by
subst x
rw [fastGrowing]
#align onote.fast_growing_def ONote.fastGrowing_def
theorem fastGrowing_zero' (o : ONote) (h : fundamentalSequence o = Sum.inl none) :
fastGrowing o = Nat.succ := by
rw [fastGrowing_def h]
#align onote.fast_growing_zero' ONote.fastGrowing_zero'
theorem fastGrowing_succ (o) {a} (h : fundamentalSequence o = Sum.inl (some a)) :
fastGrowing o = fun i => (fastGrowing a)^[i] i := by
rw [fastGrowing_def h]
#align onote.fast_growing_succ ONote.fastGrowing_succ
theorem fastGrowing_limit (o) {f} (h : fundamentalSequence o = Sum.inr f) :
fastGrowing o = fun i => fastGrowing (f i) i := by
rw [fastGrowing_def h]
#align onote.fast_growing_limit ONote.fastGrowing_limit
@[simp]
theorem fastGrowing_zero : fastGrowing 0 = Nat.succ :=
fastGrowing_zero' _ rfl
#align onote.fast_growing_zero ONote.fastGrowing_zero
@[simp]
theorem fastGrowing_one : fastGrowing 1 = fun n => 2 * n := by
rw [@fastGrowing_succ 1 0 rfl]; funext i; rw [two_mul, fastGrowing_zero]
suffices ∀ a b, Nat.succ^[a] b = b + a from this _ _
intro a b; induction a <;> simp [*, Function.iterate_succ', Nat.add_assoc, -Function.iterate_succ]
#align onote.fast_growing_one ONote.fastGrowing_one
section
@[simp]
theorem fastGrowing_two : fastGrowing 2 = fun n => (2 ^ n) * n := by
rw [@fastGrowing_succ 2 1 rfl]; funext i; rw [fastGrowing_one]
suffices ∀ a b, (fun n : ℕ => 2 * n)^[a] b = (2 ^ a) * b from this _ _
intro a b; induction a <;>
simp [*, Function.iterate_succ, pow_succ, mul_assoc, -Function.iterate_succ]
#align onote.fast_growing_two ONote.fastGrowing_two
end
def fastGrowingε₀ (i : ℕ) : ℕ :=
fastGrowing ((fun a => a.oadd 1 0)^[i] 0) i
#align onote.fast_growing_ε₀ ONote.fastGrowingε₀
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Notation.lean | 1,233 | 1,233 | theorem fastGrowingε₀_zero : fastGrowingε₀ 0 = 1 := by | simp [fastGrowingε₀]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.unoriented.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"46b633fd842bef9469441c0209906f6dddd2b4f5"
assert_not_exists HasFDerivAt
assert_not_exists ConformalAt
noncomputable section
open Real Set
open Real
open RealInnerProductSpace
namespace InnerProductGeometry
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] {x y : V}
def angle (x y : V) : ℝ :=
Real.arccos (⟪x, y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖))
#align inner_product_geometry.angle InnerProductGeometry.angle
theorem continuousAt_angle {x : V × V} (hx1 : x.1 ≠ 0) (hx2 : x.2 ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : V × V => angle y.1 y.2) x :=
Real.continuous_arccos.continuousAt.comp <|
continuous_inner.continuousAt.div
((continuous_norm.comp continuous_fst).mul (continuous_norm.comp continuous_snd)).continuousAt
(by simp [hx1, hx2])
#align inner_product_geometry.continuous_at_angle InnerProductGeometry.continuousAt_angle
theorem angle_smul_smul {c : ℝ} (hc : c ≠ 0) (x y : V) : angle (c • x) (c • y) = angle x y := by
have : c * c ≠ 0 := mul_ne_zero hc hc
rw [angle, angle, real_inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, norm_smul, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs,
mul_mul_mul_comm _ ‖x‖, abs_mul_abs_self, ← mul_assoc c c, mul_div_mul_left _ _ this]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_smul_smul InnerProductGeometry.angle_smul_smul
@[simp]
theorem _root_.LinearIsometry.angle_map {E F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[InnerProductSpace ℝ E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F] (f : E →ₗᵢ[ℝ] F) (u v : E) :
angle (f u) (f v) = angle u v := by
rw [angle, angle, f.inner_map_map, f.norm_map, f.norm_map]
#align linear_isometry.angle_map LinearIsometry.angle_map
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem _root_.Submodule.angle_coe {s : Submodule ℝ V} (x y : s) :
angle (x : V) (y : V) = angle x y :=
s.subtypeₗᵢ.angle_map x y
#align submodule.angle_coe Submodule.angle_coe
theorem cos_angle (x y : V) : Real.cos (angle x y) = ⟪x, y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) :=
Real.cos_arccos (abs_le.mp (abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one x y)).1
(abs_le.mp (abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one x y)).2
#align inner_product_geometry.cos_angle InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle
theorem angle_comm (x y : V) : angle x y = angle y x := by
unfold angle
rw [real_inner_comm, mul_comm]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_comm InnerProductGeometry.angle_comm
@[simp]
theorem angle_neg_neg (x y : V) : angle (-x) (-y) = angle x y := by
unfold angle
rw [inner_neg_neg, norm_neg, norm_neg]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_neg_neg InnerProductGeometry.angle_neg_neg
theorem angle_nonneg (x y : V) : 0 ≤ angle x y :=
Real.arccos_nonneg _
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_nonneg InnerProductGeometry.angle_nonneg
theorem angle_le_pi (x y : V) : angle x y ≤ π :=
Real.arccos_le_pi _
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_le_pi InnerProductGeometry.angle_le_pi
theorem angle_neg_right (x y : V) : angle x (-y) = π - angle x y := by
unfold angle
rw [← Real.arccos_neg, norm_neg, inner_neg_right, neg_div]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_neg_right InnerProductGeometry.angle_neg_right
theorem angle_neg_left (x y : V) : angle (-x) y = π - angle x y := by
rw [← angle_neg_neg, neg_neg, angle_neg_right]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_neg_left InnerProductGeometry.angle_neg_left
proof_wanted angle_triangle (x y z : V) : angle x z ≤ angle x y + angle y z
@[simp]
theorem angle_zero_left (x : V) : angle 0 x = π / 2 := by
unfold angle
rw [inner_zero_left, zero_div, Real.arccos_zero]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_zero_left InnerProductGeometry.angle_zero_left
@[simp]
theorem angle_zero_right (x : V) : angle x 0 = π / 2 := by
unfold angle
rw [inner_zero_right, zero_div, Real.arccos_zero]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_zero_right InnerProductGeometry.angle_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem angle_self {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : angle x x = 0 := by
unfold angle
rw [← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, div_self (inner_self_ne_zero.2 hx : ⟪x, x⟫ ≠ 0),
Real.arccos_one]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_self InnerProductGeometry.angle_self
@[simp]
theorem angle_self_neg_of_nonzero {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : angle x (-x) = π := by
rw [angle_neg_right, angle_self hx, sub_zero]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_self_neg_of_nonzero InnerProductGeometry.angle_self_neg_of_nonzero
@[simp]
theorem angle_neg_self_of_nonzero {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : angle (-x) x = π := by
rw [angle_comm, angle_self_neg_of_nonzero hx]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_neg_self_of_nonzero InnerProductGeometry.angle_neg_self_of_nonzero
@[simp]
theorem angle_smul_right_of_pos (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : angle x (r • y) = angle x y := by
unfold angle
rw [inner_smul_right, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hr), ← mul_assoc,
mul_comm _ r, mul_assoc, mul_div_mul_left _ _ (ne_of_gt hr)]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_smul_right_of_pos InnerProductGeometry.angle_smul_right_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem angle_smul_left_of_pos (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : angle (r • x) y = angle x y := by
rw [angle_comm, angle_smul_right_of_pos y x hr, angle_comm]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_smul_left_of_pos InnerProductGeometry.angle_smul_left_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem angle_smul_right_of_neg (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
angle x (r • y) = angle x (-y) := by
rw [← neg_neg r, neg_smul, angle_neg_right, angle_smul_right_of_pos x y (neg_pos_of_neg hr),
angle_neg_right]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_smul_right_of_neg InnerProductGeometry.angle_smul_right_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem angle_smul_left_of_neg (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) : angle (r • x) y = angle (-x) y := by
rw [angle_comm, angle_smul_right_of_neg y x hr, angle_comm]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_smul_left_of_neg InnerProductGeometry.angle_smul_left_of_neg
theorem cos_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm (x y : V) : Real.cos (angle x y) * (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) = ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [cos_angle, div_mul_cancel_of_imp]
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [or_imp]
#align inner_product_geometry.cos_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm
theorem sin_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm (x y : V) :
Real.sin (angle x y) * (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) = √(⟪x, x⟫ * ⟪y, y⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪x, y⟫) := by
unfold angle
rw [Real.sin_arccos, ← Real.sqrt_mul_self (mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg x) (norm_nonneg y)),
← Real.sqrt_mul' _ (mul_self_nonneg _), sq,
Real.sqrt_mul_self (mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg x) (norm_nonneg y)),
real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
by_cases h : ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ = 0
· rw [show ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ * (‖y‖ * ‖y‖) = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ * (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) by ring, h, mul_zero,
mul_zero, zero_sub]
cases' eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero h with hx hy
· rw [norm_eq_zero] at hx
rw [hx, inner_zero_left, zero_mul, neg_zero]
· rw [norm_eq_zero] at hy
rw [hy, inner_zero_right, zero_mul, neg_zero]
· field_simp [h]
ring_nf
#align inner_product_geometry.sin_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm InnerProductGeometry.sin_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm
theorem angle_eq_zero_iff {x y : V} : angle x y = 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, 0 < r ∧ y = r • x := by
rw [angle, ← real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff, Real.arccos_eq_zero, LE.le.le_iff_eq,
eq_comm]
exact (abs_le.mp (abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one x y)).2
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_eq_zero_iff InnerProductGeometry.angle_eq_zero_iff
theorem angle_eq_pi_iff {x y : V} : angle x y = π ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, r < 0 ∧ y = r • x := by
rw [angle, ← real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_iff, Real.arccos_eq_pi, LE.le.le_iff_eq]
exact (abs_le.mp (abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one x y)).1
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_eq_pi_iff InnerProductGeometry.angle_eq_pi_iff
theorem angle_add_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi {x y : V} (z : V) (h : angle x y = π) :
angle x z + angle y z = π := by
rcases angle_eq_pi_iff.1 h with ⟨_, ⟨r, ⟨hr, rfl⟩⟩⟩
rw [angle_smul_left_of_neg x z hr, angle_neg_left, add_sub_cancel]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_add_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi
theorem inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two (x y : V) : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0 ↔ angle x y = π / 2 :=
Iff.symm <| by simp (config := { contextual := true }) [angle, or_imp]
#align inner_product_geometry.inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two InnerProductGeometry.inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem inner_eq_neg_mul_norm_of_angle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : angle x y = π) :
⟪x, y⟫ = -(‖x‖ * ‖y‖) := by
simp [← cos_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm, h]
#align inner_product_geometry.inner_eq_neg_mul_norm_of_angle_eq_pi InnerProductGeometry.inner_eq_neg_mul_norm_of_angle_eq_pi
theorem inner_eq_mul_norm_of_angle_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : angle x y = 0) : ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by
simp [← cos_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm, h]
#align inner_product_geometry.inner_eq_mul_norm_of_angle_eq_zero InnerProductGeometry.inner_eq_mul_norm_of_angle_eq_zero
theorem inner_eq_neg_mul_norm_iff_angle_eq_pi {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
⟪x, y⟫ = -(‖x‖ * ‖y‖) ↔ angle x y = π := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, inner_eq_neg_mul_norm_of_angle_eq_pi⟩
have h₁ : ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ≠ 0 := (mul_pos (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx) (norm_pos_iff.mpr hy)).ne'
rw [angle, h, neg_div, div_self h₁, Real.arccos_neg_one]
#align inner_product_geometry.inner_eq_neg_mul_norm_iff_angle_eq_pi InnerProductGeometry.inner_eq_neg_mul_norm_iff_angle_eq_pi
theorem inner_eq_mul_norm_iff_angle_eq_zero {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ angle x y = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, inner_eq_mul_norm_of_angle_eq_zero⟩
have h₁ : ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ≠ 0 := (mul_pos (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx) (norm_pos_iff.mpr hy)).ne'
rw [angle, h, div_self h₁, Real.arccos_one]
#align inner_product_geometry.inner_eq_mul_norm_iff_angle_eq_zero InnerProductGeometry.inner_eq_mul_norm_iff_angle_eq_zero
theorem norm_sub_eq_add_norm_of_angle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : angle x y = π) :
‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ := by
rw [← sq_eq_sq (norm_nonneg (x - y)) (add_nonneg (norm_nonneg x) (norm_nonneg y)),
norm_sub_pow_two_real, inner_eq_neg_mul_norm_of_angle_eq_pi h]
ring
#align inner_product_geometry.norm_sub_eq_add_norm_of_angle_eq_pi InnerProductGeometry.norm_sub_eq_add_norm_of_angle_eq_pi
theorem norm_add_eq_add_norm_of_angle_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : angle x y = 0) :
‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ := by
rw [← sq_eq_sq (norm_nonneg (x + y)) (add_nonneg (norm_nonneg x) (norm_nonneg y)),
norm_add_pow_two_real, inner_eq_mul_norm_of_angle_eq_zero h]
ring
#align inner_product_geometry.norm_add_eq_add_norm_of_angle_eq_zero InnerProductGeometry.norm_add_eq_add_norm_of_angle_eq_zero
theorem norm_sub_eq_abs_sub_norm_of_angle_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : angle x y = 0) :
‖x - y‖ = |‖x‖ - ‖y‖| := by
rw [← sq_eq_sq (norm_nonneg (x - y)) (abs_nonneg (‖x‖ - ‖y‖)), norm_sub_pow_two_real,
inner_eq_mul_norm_of_angle_eq_zero h, sq_abs (‖x‖ - ‖y‖)]
ring
#align inner_product_geometry.norm_sub_eq_abs_sub_norm_of_angle_eq_zero InnerProductGeometry.norm_sub_eq_abs_sub_norm_of_angle_eq_zero
theorem norm_sub_eq_add_norm_iff_angle_eq_pi {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ ↔ angle x y = π := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, norm_sub_eq_add_norm_of_angle_eq_pi⟩
rw [← inner_eq_neg_mul_norm_iff_angle_eq_pi hx hy]
obtain ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ := norm_nonneg (x - y), add_nonneg (norm_nonneg x) (norm_nonneg y)
rw [← sq_eq_sq hxy₁ hxy₂, norm_sub_pow_two_real] at h
calc
⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ ^ 2 + ‖y‖ ^ 2 - (‖x‖ + ‖y‖) ^ 2) / 2 := by linarith
_ = -(‖x‖ * ‖y‖) := by ring
#align inner_product_geometry.norm_sub_eq_add_norm_iff_angle_eq_pi InnerProductGeometry.norm_sub_eq_add_norm_iff_angle_eq_pi
theorem norm_add_eq_add_norm_iff_angle_eq_zero {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ ↔ angle x y = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, norm_add_eq_add_norm_of_angle_eq_zero⟩
rw [← inner_eq_mul_norm_iff_angle_eq_zero hx hy]
obtain ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ := norm_nonneg (x + y), add_nonneg (norm_nonneg x) (norm_nonneg y)
rw [← sq_eq_sq hxy₁ hxy₂, norm_add_pow_two_real] at h
calc
⟪x, y⟫ = ((‖x‖ + ‖y‖) ^ 2 - ‖x‖ ^ 2 - ‖y‖ ^ 2) / 2 := by linarith
_ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by ring
#align inner_product_geometry.norm_add_eq_add_norm_iff_angle_eq_zero InnerProductGeometry.norm_add_eq_add_norm_iff_angle_eq_zero
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Unoriented/Basic.lean | 323 | 333 | theorem norm_sub_eq_abs_sub_norm_iff_angle_eq_zero {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
‖x - y‖ = |‖x‖ - ‖y‖| ↔ angle x y = 0 := by |
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, norm_sub_eq_abs_sub_norm_of_angle_eq_zero⟩
rw [← inner_eq_mul_norm_iff_angle_eq_zero hx hy]
have h1 : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = (‖x‖ - ‖y‖) ^ 2 := by
rw [h]
exact sq_abs (‖x‖ - ‖y‖)
rw [norm_sub_pow_two_real] at h1
calc
⟪x, y⟫ = ((‖x‖ + ‖y‖) ^ 2 - ‖x‖ ^ 2 - ‖y‖ ^ 2) / 2 := by linarith
_ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by ring
|
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.AffineScheme
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Pullbacks
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.Limits
import Mathlib.Data.List.TFAE
#align_import algebraic_geometry.morphisms.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"434e2fd21c1900747afc6d13d8be7f4eedba7218"
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
universe u
open TopologicalSpace CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits Opposite
noncomputable section
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
def AffineTargetMorphismProperty :=
∀ ⦃X Y : Scheme⦄ (_ : X ⟶ Y) [IsAffine Y], Prop
#align algebraic_geometry.affine_target_morphism_property AlgebraicGeometry.AffineTargetMorphismProperty
protected def Scheme.isIso : MorphismProperty Scheme :=
@IsIso Scheme _
#align algebraic_geometry.Scheme.is_iso AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.isIso
protected def Scheme.affineTargetIsIso : AffineTargetMorphismProperty := fun _ _ f _ => IsIso f
#align algebraic_geometry.Scheme.affine_target_is_iso AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.affineTargetIsIso
instance : Inhabited AffineTargetMorphismProperty := ⟨Scheme.affineTargetIsIso⟩
def AffineTargetMorphismProperty.toProperty (P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty) :
MorphismProperty Scheme := fun _ _ f => ∃ h, @P _ _ f h
#align algebraic_geometry.affine_target_morphism_property.to_property AlgebraicGeometry.AffineTargetMorphismProperty.toProperty
theorem AffineTargetMorphismProperty.toProperty_apply (P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty)
{X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) [i : IsAffine Y] : P.toProperty f ↔ P f := by
delta AffineTargetMorphismProperty.toProperty; simp [*]
#align algebraic_geometry.affine_target_morphism_property.to_property_apply AlgebraicGeometry.AffineTargetMorphismProperty.toProperty_apply
theorem affine_cancel_left_isIso {P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty} (hP : P.toProperty.RespectsIso)
{X Y Z : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] [IsAffine Z] : P (f ≫ g) ↔ P g := by
rw [← P.toProperty_apply, ← P.toProperty_apply, hP.cancel_left_isIso]
#align algebraic_geometry.affine_cancel_left_is_iso AlgebraicGeometry.affine_cancel_left_isIso
theorem affine_cancel_right_isIso {P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty} (hP : P.toProperty.RespectsIso)
{X Y Z : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso g] [IsAffine Z] [IsAffine Y] :
P (f ≫ g) ↔ P f := by rw [← P.toProperty_apply, ← P.toProperty_apply, hP.cancel_right_isIso]
#align algebraic_geometry.affine_cancel_right_is_iso AlgebraicGeometry.affine_cancel_right_isIso
theorem AffineTargetMorphismProperty.respectsIso_mk {P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty}
(h₁ : ∀ {X Y Z} (e : X ≅ Y) (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsAffine Z], P f → P (e.hom ≫ f))
(h₂ : ∀ {X Y Z} (e : Y ≅ Z) (f : X ⟶ Y) [h : IsAffine Y],
P f → @P _ _ (f ≫ e.hom) (isAffineOfIso e.inv)) :
P.toProperty.RespectsIso := by
constructor
· rintro X Y Z e f ⟨a, h⟩; exact ⟨a, h₁ e f h⟩
· rintro X Y Z e f ⟨a, h⟩; exact ⟨isAffineOfIso e.inv, h₂ e f h⟩
#align algebraic_geometry.affine_target_morphism_property.respects_iso_mk AlgebraicGeometry.AffineTargetMorphismProperty.respectsIso_mk
def targetAffineLocally (P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty) : MorphismProperty Scheme :=
fun {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) => ∀ U : Y.affineOpens, @P _ _ (f ∣_ U) U.prop
#align algebraic_geometry.target_affine_locally AlgebraicGeometry.targetAffineLocally
theorem IsAffineOpen.map_isIso {X Y : Scheme} {U : Opens Y.carrier} (hU : IsAffineOpen U)
(f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] : IsAffineOpen ((Opens.map f.1.base).obj U) :=
haveI : IsAffine _ := hU
isAffineOfIso (f ∣_ U)
#align algebraic_geometry.is_affine_open.map_is_iso AlgebraicGeometry.IsAffineOpen.map_isIso
theorem targetAffineLocally_respectsIso {P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty}
(hP : P.toProperty.RespectsIso) : (targetAffineLocally P).RespectsIso := by
constructor
· introv H U
rw [morphismRestrict_comp, affine_cancel_left_isIso hP]
exact H U
· introv H
rintro ⟨U, hU : IsAffineOpen U⟩; dsimp
haveI : IsAffine _ := hU.map_isIso e.hom
rw [morphismRestrict_comp, affine_cancel_right_isIso hP]
exact H ⟨(Opens.map e.hom.val.base).obj U, hU.map_isIso e.hom⟩
#align algebraic_geometry.target_affine_locally_respects_iso AlgebraicGeometry.targetAffineLocally_respectsIso
structure AffineTargetMorphismProperty.IsLocal (P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty) : Prop where
RespectsIso : P.toProperty.RespectsIso
toBasicOpen :
∀ {X Y : Scheme} [IsAffine Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) (r : Y.presheaf.obj <| op ⊤),
P f → @P _ _ (f ∣_ Y.basicOpen r) ((topIsAffineOpen Y).basicOpenIsAffine _)
ofBasicOpenCover :
∀ {X Y : Scheme} [IsAffine Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) (s : Finset (Y.presheaf.obj <| op ⊤))
(_ : Ideal.span (s : Set (Y.presheaf.obj <| op ⊤)) = ⊤),
(∀ r : s, @P _ _ (f ∣_ Y.basicOpen r.1) ((topIsAffineOpen Y).basicOpenIsAffine _)) → P f
#align algebraic_geometry.affine_target_morphism_property.is_local AlgebraicGeometry.AffineTargetMorphismProperty.IsLocal
@[local simp] lemma CommRingCat.id_apply (R : CommRingCat) (x : R) : 𝟙 R x = x := rfl
theorem targetAffineLocallyOfOpenCover {P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty} (hP : P.IsLocal)
{X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) (𝒰 : Y.OpenCover) [∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)]
(h𝒰 : ∀ i, P (pullback.snd : (𝒰.pullbackCover f).obj i ⟶ 𝒰.obj i)) :
targetAffineLocally P f := by
classical
let S i := (⟨⟨Set.range (𝒰.map i).1.base, (𝒰.IsOpen i).base_open.isOpen_range⟩,
rangeIsAffineOpenOfOpenImmersion (𝒰.map i)⟩ : Y.affineOpens)
intro U
apply of_affine_open_cover (P := _) U (Set.range S)
· intro U r h
haveI : IsAffine _ := U.2
have := hP.2 (f ∣_ U.1)
replace this := this (Y.presheaf.map (eqToHom U.1.openEmbedding_obj_top).op r) h
rw [← P.toProperty_apply] at this ⊢
exact (hP.1.arrow_mk_iso_iff (morphismRestrictRestrictBasicOpen f _ r)).mp this
· intro U s hs H
haveI : IsAffine _ := U.2
apply hP.3 (f ∣_ U.1) (s.image (Y.presheaf.map (eqToHom U.1.openEmbedding_obj_top).op))
· apply_fun Ideal.comap (Y.presheaf.map (eqToHom U.1.openEmbedding_obj_top.symm).op) at hs
rw [Ideal.comap_top] at hs
rw [← hs]
simp only [eqToHom_op, eqToHom_map, Finset.coe_image]
have : ∀ {R S : CommRingCat} (e : S = R) (s : Set S),
Ideal.span (eqToHom e '' s) = Ideal.comap (eqToHom e.symm) (Ideal.span s) := by
intro _ S e _
subst e
simp only [eqToHom_refl, CommRingCat.id_apply, Set.image_id']
-- Porting note: Lean didn't see `𝟙 _` is just ring hom id
exact (Ideal.comap_id _).symm
apply this
· rintro ⟨r, hr⟩
obtain ⟨r, hr', rfl⟩ := Finset.mem_image.mp hr
specialize H ⟨r, hr'⟩
rw [← P.toProperty_apply] at H ⊢
exact (hP.1.arrow_mk_iso_iff (morphismRestrictRestrictBasicOpen f _ r)).mpr H
· rw [Set.eq_univ_iff_forall]
simp only [Set.mem_iUnion]
intro x
exact ⟨⟨_, ⟨𝒰.f x, rfl⟩⟩, 𝒰.Covers x⟩
· rintro ⟨_, i, rfl⟩
specialize h𝒰 i
rw [← P.toProperty_apply] at h𝒰 ⊢
exact (hP.1.arrow_mk_iso_iff (morphismRestrictOpensRange f _)).mpr h𝒰
#align algebraic_geometry.target_affine_locally_of_open_cover AlgebraicGeometry.targetAffineLocallyOfOpenCover
open List in
theorem AffineTargetMorphismProperty.IsLocal.affine_openCover_TFAE
{P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty} (hP : P.IsLocal) {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
TFAE
[targetAffineLocally P f,
∃ (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y) (_ : ∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)),
∀ i : 𝒰.J, P (pullback.snd : (𝒰.pullbackCover f).obj i ⟶ 𝒰.obj i),
∀ (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y) [∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)] (i : 𝒰.J),
P (pullback.snd : (𝒰.pullbackCover f).obj i ⟶ 𝒰.obj i),
∀ {U : Scheme} (g : U ⟶ Y) [IsAffine U] [IsOpenImmersion g],
P (pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ U),
∃ (ι : Type u) (U : ι → Opens Y.carrier) (_ : iSup U = ⊤) (hU' : ∀ i, IsAffineOpen (U i)),
∀ i, @P _ _ (f ∣_ U i) (hU' i)] := by
tfae_have 1 → 4
· intro H U g h₁ h₂
replace H := H ⟨⟨_, h₂.base_open.isOpen_range⟩, rangeIsAffineOpenOfOpenImmersion g⟩
rw [← P.toProperty_apply] at H ⊢
rwa [← hP.1.arrow_mk_iso_iff (morphismRestrictOpensRange f _)]
tfae_have 4 → 3
· intro H 𝒰 h𝒰 i
apply H
tfae_have 3 → 2
· exact fun H => ⟨Y.affineCover, inferInstance, H Y.affineCover⟩
tfae_have 2 → 1
· rintro ⟨𝒰, h𝒰, H⟩; exact targetAffineLocallyOfOpenCover hP f 𝒰 H
tfae_have 5 → 2
· rintro ⟨ι, U, hU, hU', H⟩
refine ⟨Y.openCoverOfSuprEqTop U hU, hU', ?_⟩
intro i
specialize H i
rw [← P.toProperty_apply, ← hP.1.arrow_mk_iso_iff (morphismRestrictOpensRange f _)]
rw [← P.toProperty_apply] at H
convert H
all_goals ext1; exact Subtype.range_coe
tfae_have 1 → 5
· intro H
refine ⟨Y.carrier, fun x => (Scheme.Hom.opensRange <| Y.affineCover.map x),
?_, fun i => rangeIsAffineOpenOfOpenImmersion _, ?_⟩
· rw [eq_top_iff]; intro x _; erw [Opens.mem_iSup]; exact ⟨x, Y.affineCover.Covers x⟩
· intro i; exact H ⟨_, rangeIsAffineOpenOfOpenImmersion _⟩
tfae_finish
#align algebraic_geometry.affine_target_morphism_property.is_local.affine_open_cover_tfae AlgebraicGeometry.AffineTargetMorphismProperty.IsLocal.affine_openCover_TFAE
theorem AffineTargetMorphismProperty.isLocalOfOpenCoverImply (P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty)
(hP : P.toProperty.RespectsIso)
(H : ∀ {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y),
(∃ (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y) (_ : ∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)),
∀ i : 𝒰.J, P (pullback.snd : (𝒰.pullbackCover f).obj i ⟶ 𝒰.obj i)) →
∀ {U : Scheme} (g : U ⟶ Y) [IsAffine U] [IsOpenImmersion g],
P (pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ U)) :
P.IsLocal := by
refine ⟨hP, ?_, ?_⟩
· introv h
haveI : IsAffine _ := (topIsAffineOpen Y).basicOpenIsAffine r
delta morphismRestrict
rw [affine_cancel_left_isIso hP]
refine @H _ _ f ⟨Scheme.openCoverOfIsIso (𝟙 Y), ?_, ?_⟩ _ (Y.ofRestrict _) _ _
· intro i; dsimp; infer_instance
· intro i; dsimp
rwa [← Category.comp_id pullback.snd, ← pullback.condition, affine_cancel_left_isIso hP]
· introv hs hs'
replace hs := ((topIsAffineOpen Y).basicOpen_union_eq_self_iff _).mpr hs
have := H f ⟨Y.openCoverOfSuprEqTop _ hs, ?_, ?_⟩ (𝟙 _)
· rwa [← Category.comp_id pullback.snd, ← pullback.condition, affine_cancel_left_isIso hP]
at this
· intro i; exact (topIsAffineOpen Y).basicOpenIsAffine _
· rintro (i : s)
specialize hs' i
haveI : IsAffine _ := (topIsAffineOpen Y).basicOpenIsAffine i.1
delta morphismRestrict at hs'
rwa [affine_cancel_left_isIso hP] at hs'
#align algebraic_geometry.affine_target_morphism_property.is_local_of_open_cover_imply AlgebraicGeometry.AffineTargetMorphismProperty.isLocalOfOpenCoverImply
theorem AffineTargetMorphismProperty.IsLocal.affine_openCover_iff {P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty}
(hP : P.IsLocal) {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y)
[h𝒰 : ∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)] :
targetAffineLocally P f ↔ ∀ i, @P _ _ (pullback.snd : pullback f (𝒰.map i) ⟶ _) (h𝒰 i) := by
refine ⟨fun H => let h := ((hP.affine_openCover_TFAE f).out 0 2).mp H; ?_,
fun H => let h := ((hP.affine_openCover_TFAE f).out 1 0).mp; ?_⟩
· exact fun i => h 𝒰 i
· exact h ⟨𝒰, inferInstance, H⟩
#align algebraic_geometry.affine_target_morphism_property.is_local.affine_open_cover_iff AlgebraicGeometry.AffineTargetMorphismProperty.IsLocal.affine_openCover_iff
theorem AffineTargetMorphismProperty.IsLocal.affine_target_iff {P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty}
(hP : P.IsLocal) {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsAffine Y] :
targetAffineLocally P f ↔ P f := by
haveI : ∀ i, IsAffine (Scheme.OpenCover.obj (Scheme.openCoverOfIsIso (𝟙 Y)) i) := fun i => by
dsimp; infer_instance
rw [hP.affine_openCover_iff f (Scheme.openCoverOfIsIso (𝟙 Y))]
trans P (pullback.snd : pullback f (𝟙 _) ⟶ _)
· exact ⟨fun H => H PUnit.unit, fun H _ => H⟩
rw [← Category.comp_id pullback.snd, ← pullback.condition, affine_cancel_left_isIso hP.1]
#align algebraic_geometry.affine_target_morphism_property.is_local.affine_target_iff AlgebraicGeometry.AffineTargetMorphismProperty.IsLocal.affine_target_iff
structure PropertyIsLocalAtTarget (P : MorphismProperty Scheme) : Prop where
RespectsIso : P.RespectsIso
restrict : ∀ {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) (U : Opens Y.carrier), P f → P (f ∣_ U)
of_openCover :
∀ {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y),
(∀ i : 𝒰.J, P (pullback.snd : (𝒰.pullbackCover f).obj i ⟶ 𝒰.obj i)) → P f
#align algebraic_geometry.property_is_local_at_target AlgebraicGeometry.PropertyIsLocalAtTarget
lemma propertyIsLocalAtTarget_of_morphismRestrict (P : MorphismProperty Scheme)
(hP₁ : P.RespectsIso)
(hP₂ : ∀ {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (U : Opens Y.carrier), P f → P (f ∣_ U))
(hP₃ : ∀ {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Opens Y.carrier)
(_ : iSup U = ⊤), (∀ i, P (f ∣_ U i)) → P f) :
PropertyIsLocalAtTarget P where
RespectsIso := hP₁
restrict := hP₂
of_openCover {X Y} f 𝒰 h𝒰 := by
apply hP₃ f (fun i : 𝒰.J => Scheme.Hom.opensRange (𝒰.map i)) 𝒰.iSup_opensRange
simp_rw [hP₁.arrow_mk_iso_iff (morphismRestrictOpensRange f _)]
exact h𝒰
theorem AffineTargetMorphismProperty.IsLocal.targetAffineLocallyIsLocal
{P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty} (hP : P.IsLocal) :
PropertyIsLocalAtTarget (targetAffineLocally P) := by
constructor
· exact targetAffineLocally_respectsIso hP.1
· intro X Y f U H V
rw [← P.toProperty_apply (i := V.2), hP.1.arrow_mk_iso_iff (morphismRestrictRestrict f _ _)]
convert H ⟨_, IsAffineOpen.imageIsOpenImmersion V.2 (Y.ofRestrict _)⟩
rw [← P.toProperty_apply]
· rintro X Y f 𝒰 h𝒰
-- Porting note: rewrite `[(hP.affine_openCover_TFAE f).out 0 1` directly complains about
-- metavariables
have h01 := (hP.affine_openCover_TFAE f).out 0 1
rw [h01]
refine ⟨𝒰.bind fun _ => Scheme.affineCover _, ?_, ?_⟩
· intro i; dsimp [Scheme.OpenCover.bind]; infer_instance
· intro i
specialize h𝒰 i.1
-- Porting note: rewrite `[(hP.affine_openCover_TFAE pullback.snd).out 0 1` directly
-- complains about metavariables
have h02 := (hP.affine_openCover_TFAE (pullback.snd : pullback f (𝒰.map i.fst) ⟶ _)).out 0 2
rw [h02] at h𝒰
specialize h𝒰 (Scheme.affineCover _) i.2
let e : pullback f ((𝒰.obj i.fst).affineCover.map i.snd ≫ 𝒰.map i.fst) ⟶
pullback (pullback.snd : pullback f (𝒰.map i.fst) ⟶ _)
((𝒰.obj i.fst).affineCover.map i.snd) := by
refine (pullbackSymmetry _ _).hom ≫ ?_
refine (pullbackRightPullbackFstIso _ _ _).inv ≫ ?_
refine (pullbackSymmetry _ _).hom ≫ ?_
refine pullback.map _ _ _ _ (pullbackSymmetry _ _).hom (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) ?_ ?_ <;>
simp only [Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp, pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_snd]
rw [← affine_cancel_left_isIso hP.1 e] at h𝒰
convert h𝒰 using 1
simp [e]
#align algebraic_geometry.affine_target_morphism_property.is_local.target_affine_locally_is_local AlgebraicGeometry.AffineTargetMorphismProperty.IsLocal.targetAffineLocallyIsLocal
open List in
theorem PropertyIsLocalAtTarget.openCover_TFAE {P : MorphismProperty Scheme}
(hP : PropertyIsLocalAtTarget P) {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
TFAE
[P f,
∃ 𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y,
∀ i : 𝒰.J, P (pullback.snd : (𝒰.pullbackCover f).obj i ⟶ 𝒰.obj i),
∀ (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y) (i : 𝒰.J),
P (pullback.snd : (𝒰.pullbackCover f).obj i ⟶ 𝒰.obj i),
∀ U : Opens Y.carrier, P (f ∣_ U),
∀ {U : Scheme} (g : U ⟶ Y) [IsOpenImmersion g], P (pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ U),
∃ (ι : Type u) (U : ι → Opens Y.carrier) (_ : iSup U = ⊤), ∀ i, P (f ∣_ U i)] := by
tfae_have 2 → 1
· rintro ⟨𝒰, H⟩; exact hP.3 f 𝒰 H
tfae_have 1 → 4
· intro H U; exact hP.2 f U H
tfae_have 4 → 3
· intro H 𝒰 i
rw [← hP.1.arrow_mk_iso_iff (morphismRestrictOpensRange f _)]
exact H <| Scheme.Hom.opensRange (𝒰.map i)
tfae_have 3 → 2
· exact fun H => ⟨Y.affineCover, H Y.affineCover⟩
tfae_have 4 → 5
· intro H U g hg
rw [← hP.1.arrow_mk_iso_iff (morphismRestrictOpensRange f _)]
apply H
tfae_have 5 → 4
· intro H U
erw [hP.1.cancel_left_isIso]
apply H
tfae_have 4 → 6
· intro H; exact ⟨PUnit, fun _ => ⊤, ciSup_const, fun _ => H _⟩
tfae_have 6 → 2
· rintro ⟨ι, U, hU, H⟩
refine ⟨Y.openCoverOfSuprEqTop U hU, ?_⟩
intro i
rw [← hP.1.arrow_mk_iso_iff (morphismRestrictOpensRange f _)]
convert H i
all_goals ext1; exact Subtype.range_coe
tfae_finish
#align algebraic_geometry.property_is_local_at_target.open_cover_tfae AlgebraicGeometry.PropertyIsLocalAtTarget.openCover_TFAE
theorem PropertyIsLocalAtTarget.openCover_iff {P : MorphismProperty Scheme}
(hP : PropertyIsLocalAtTarget P) {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y) :
P f ↔ ∀ i, P (pullback.snd : pullback f (𝒰.map i) ⟶ _) := by
-- Porting note: couldn't get the term mode proof work
refine ⟨fun H => let h := ((hP.openCover_TFAE f).out 0 2).mp H; fun i => ?_,
fun H => let h := ((hP.openCover_TFAE f).out 1 0).mp; ?_⟩
· exact h 𝒰 i
· exact h ⟨𝒰, H⟩
#align algebraic_geometry.property_is_local_at_target.open_cover_iff AlgebraicGeometry.PropertyIsLocalAtTarget.openCover_iff
def AffineTargetMorphismProperty.diagonal (P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty) :
AffineTargetMorphismProperty :=
fun {X _} f _ =>
∀ {U₁ U₂ : Scheme} (f₁ : U₁ ⟶ X) (f₂ : U₂ ⟶ X) [IsAffine U₁] [IsAffine U₂] [IsOpenImmersion f₁]
[IsOpenImmersion f₂], P (pullback.mapDesc f₁ f₂ f)
#align algebraic_geometry.affine_target_morphism_property.diagonal AlgebraicGeometry.AffineTargetMorphismProperty.diagonal
theorem AffineTargetMorphismProperty.diagonal_respectsIso (P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty)
(hP : P.toProperty.RespectsIso) : P.diagonal.toProperty.RespectsIso := by
delta AffineTargetMorphismProperty.diagonal
apply AffineTargetMorphismProperty.respectsIso_mk
· introv H _ _
rw [pullback.mapDesc_comp, affine_cancel_left_isIso hP, affine_cancel_right_isIso hP]
-- Porting note: add the following two instances
have i1 : IsOpenImmersion (f₁ ≫ e.hom) := PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.comp _ _
have i2 : IsOpenImmersion (f₂ ≫ e.hom) := PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.comp _ _
apply H
· introv H _ _
-- Porting note: add the following two instances
have _ : IsAffine Z := isAffineOfIso e.inv
rw [pullback.mapDesc_comp, affine_cancel_right_isIso hP]
apply H
#align algebraic_geometry.affine_target_morphism_property.diagonal_respects_iso AlgebraicGeometry.AffineTargetMorphismProperty.diagonal_respectsIso
theorem diagonalTargetAffineLocallyOfOpenCover (P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty) (hP : P.IsLocal)
{X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y) [∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)]
(𝒰' : ∀ i, Scheme.OpenCover.{u} (pullback f (𝒰.map i))) [∀ i j, IsAffine ((𝒰' i).obj j)]
(h𝒰' : ∀ i j k, P (pullback.mapDesc ((𝒰' i).map j) ((𝒰' i).map k) pullback.snd)) :
(targetAffineLocally P).diagonal f := by
let 𝒱 := (Scheme.Pullback.openCoverOfBase 𝒰 f f).bind fun i =>
Scheme.Pullback.openCoverOfLeftRight.{u} (𝒰' i) (𝒰' i) pullback.snd pullback.snd
have i1 : ∀ i, IsAffine (𝒱.obj i) := fun i => by dsimp [𝒱]; infer_instance
apply (hP.affine_openCover_iff _ 𝒱).mpr
rintro ⟨i, j, k⟩
dsimp [𝒱]
convert (affine_cancel_left_isIso hP.1
(pullbackDiagonalMapIso _ _ ((𝒰' i).map j) ((𝒰' i).map k)).inv pullback.snd).mp _
pick_goal 3
· convert h𝒰' i j k; apply pullback.hom_ext <;> simp
all_goals apply pullback.hom_ext <;>
simp only [Category.assoc, pullback.lift_fst, pullback.lift_snd, pullback.lift_fst_assoc,
pullback.lift_snd_assoc]
#align algebraic_geometry.diagonal_target_affine_locally_of_open_cover AlgebraicGeometry.diagonalTargetAffineLocallyOfOpenCover
theorem AffineTargetMorphismProperty.diagonalOfTargetAffineLocally
(P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty) (hP : P.IsLocal) {X Y U : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : U ⟶ Y)
[IsAffine U] [IsOpenImmersion g] (H : (targetAffineLocally P).diagonal f) :
P.diagonal (pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ _) := by
rintro U V f₁ f₂ hU hV hf₁ hf₂
replace H := ((hP.affine_openCover_TFAE (pullback.diagonal f)).out 0 3).mp H
let g₁ := pullback.map (f₁ ≫ pullback.snd) (f₂ ≫ pullback.snd) f f
(f₁ ≫ pullback.fst) (f₂ ≫ pullback.fst) g
(by rw [Category.assoc, Category.assoc, pullback.condition])
(by rw [Category.assoc, Category.assoc, pullback.condition])
specialize H g₁
rw [← affine_cancel_left_isIso hP.1 (pullbackDiagonalMapIso f _ f₁ f₂).hom]
convert H
apply pullback.hom_ext <;>
simp only [Category.assoc, pullback.lift_fst, pullback.lift_snd, pullback.lift_fst_assoc,
pullback.lift_snd_assoc, Category.comp_id, pullbackDiagonalMapIso_hom_fst,
pullbackDiagonalMapIso_hom_snd]
#align algebraic_geometry.affine_target_morphism_property.diagonal_of_target_affine_locally AlgebraicGeometry.AffineTargetMorphismProperty.diagonalOfTargetAffineLocally
open List in
theorem AffineTargetMorphismProperty.IsLocal.diagonal_affine_openCover_TFAE
{P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty} (hP : P.IsLocal) {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
TFAE
[(targetAffineLocally P).diagonal f,
∃ (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y) (_ : ∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)),
∀ i : 𝒰.J, P.diagonal (pullback.snd : pullback f (𝒰.map i) ⟶ _),
∀ (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y) [∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)] (i : 𝒰.J),
P.diagonal (pullback.snd : pullback f (𝒰.map i) ⟶ _),
∀ {U : Scheme} (g : U ⟶ Y) [IsAffine U] [IsOpenImmersion g],
P.diagonal (pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ _),
∃ (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y) (_ : ∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)) (𝒰' :
∀ i, Scheme.OpenCover.{u} (pullback f (𝒰.map i))) (_ : ∀ i j, IsAffine ((𝒰' i).obj j)),
∀ i j k, P (pullback.mapDesc ((𝒰' i).map j) ((𝒰' i).map k) pullback.snd)] := by
tfae_have 1 → 4
· introv H hU hg _ _; apply P.diagonalOfTargetAffineLocally <;> assumption
tfae_have 4 → 3
· introv H h𝒰; apply H
tfae_have 3 → 2
· exact fun H => ⟨Y.affineCover, inferInstance, H Y.affineCover⟩
tfae_have 2 → 5
· rintro ⟨𝒰, h𝒰, H⟩
refine ⟨𝒰, inferInstance, fun _ => Scheme.affineCover _, inferInstance, ?_⟩
intro i j k
apply H
tfae_have 5 → 1
· rintro ⟨𝒰, _, 𝒰', _, H⟩
exact diagonalTargetAffineLocallyOfOpenCover P hP f 𝒰 𝒰' H
tfae_finish
#align algebraic_geometry.affine_target_morphism_property.is_local.diagonal_affine_open_cover_tfae AlgebraicGeometry.AffineTargetMorphismProperty.IsLocal.diagonal_affine_openCover_TFAE
theorem AffineTargetMorphismProperty.IsLocal.diagonal {P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty}
(hP : P.IsLocal) : P.diagonal.IsLocal :=
AffineTargetMorphismProperty.isLocalOfOpenCoverImply P.diagonal (P.diagonal_respectsIso hP.1)
fun {_ _} f => ((hP.diagonal_affine_openCover_TFAE f).out 1 3).mp
#align algebraic_geometry.affine_target_morphism_property.is_local.diagonal AlgebraicGeometry.AffineTargetMorphismProperty.IsLocal.diagonal
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/Morphisms/Basic.lean | 583 | 587 | theorem diagonal_targetAffineLocally_eq_targetAffineLocally (P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty)
(hP : P.IsLocal) : (targetAffineLocally P).diagonal = targetAffineLocally P.diagonal := by |
ext _ _ f
exact ((hP.diagonal_affine_openCover_TFAE f).out 0 1).trans
((hP.diagonal.affine_openCover_TFAE f).out 1 0)
|
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
#align_import order.heyting.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9ac7c0c8c4d7a535ec3e5b34b8859aab9233b2f4"
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_himp fst_himp
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_himp snd_himp
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_hnot fst_hnot
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_hnot snd_hnot
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_sdiff fst_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_sdiff snd_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
#align fst_compl fst_compl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
#align snd_compl snd_compl
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
#align generalized_heyting_algebra GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
#align generalized_heyting_algebra.to_order_top GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra.to_order_bot GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
#align heyting_algebra HeytingAlgebra
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
#align coheyting_algebra CoheytingAlgebra
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
#align biheyting_algebra BiheytingAlgebra
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
--#align heyting_algebra.to_bounded_order HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
#align coheyting_algebra.to_bounded_order CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
#align biheyting_algebra.to_coheyting_algebra BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun a => rfl }
#align heyting_algebra.of_himp HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
#align heyting_algebra.of_compl HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun a => rfl }
#align coheyting_algebra.of_sdiff CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
#align coheyting_algebra.of_hnot CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_le_iff : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c :=
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.sdiff_le_iff _ _ _
#align sdiff_le_iff sdiff_le_iff
theorem sdiff_le_iff' : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ⊔ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_comm]
#align sdiff_le_iff' sdiff_le_iff'
theorem sdiff_le_comm : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a \ c ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff']
#align sdiff_le_comm sdiff_le_comm
theorem sdiff_le : a \ b ≤ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_right
#align sdiff_le sdiff_le
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint (a \ c) b :=
h.mono_left sdiff_le
#align disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint a (b \ c) :=
h.mono_right sdiff_le
#align disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right
theorem sdiff_le_iff_left : a \ b ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_idem]
#align sdiff_le_iff_left sdiff_le_iff_left
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_self : a \ a = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.1 <| sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_left
#align sdiff_self sdiff_self
theorem le_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ a \ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.1 le_rfl
#align le_sup_sdiff le_sup_sdiff
theorem le_sdiff_sup : a ≤ a \ b ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
#align le_sdiff_sup le_sdiff_sup
theorem sup_sdiff_left : a ⊔ a \ b = a :=
sup_of_le_left sdiff_le
#align sup_sdiff_left sup_sdiff_left
theorem sup_sdiff_right : a \ b ⊔ a = a :=
sup_of_le_right sdiff_le
#align sup_sdiff_right sup_sdiff_right
theorem inf_sdiff_left : a \ b ⊓ a = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_left sdiff_le
#align inf_sdiff_left inf_sdiff_left
theorem inf_sdiff_right : a ⊓ a \ b = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_right sdiff_le
#align inf_sdiff_right inf_sdiff_right
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_self (a b : α) : a ⊔ b \ a = a ⊔ b :=
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le _) (sup_le le_sup_left le_sup_sdiff)
#align sup_sdiff_self sup_sdiff_self
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sup_self (a b : α) : b \ a ⊔ a = b ⊔ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_comm]
#align sdiff_sup_self sdiff_sup_self
alias sup_sdiff_self_left := sdiff_sup_self
#align sup_sdiff_self_left sup_sdiff_self_left
alias sup_sdiff_self_right := sup_sdiff_self
#align sup_sdiff_self_right sup_sdiff_self_right
theorem sup_sdiff_eq_sup (h : c ≤ a) : a ⊔ b \ c = a ⊔ b :=
sup_congr_left (sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right) <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
#align sup_sdiff_eq_sup sup_sdiff_eq_sup
-- cf. `Set.union_diff_cancel'`
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel' (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : b ⊔ c \ a = c := by
rw [sup_sdiff_eq_sup hab, sup_of_le_right hbc]
#align sup_sdiff_cancel' sup_sdiff_cancel'
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : a ≤ b) : a ⊔ b \ a = b :=
sup_sdiff_cancel' le_rfl h
#align sup_sdiff_cancel_right sup_sdiff_cancel_right
theorem sdiff_sup_cancel (h : b ≤ a) : a \ b ⊔ b = a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_cancel_right h]
#align sdiff_sup_cancel sdiff_sup_cancel
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left (h : b ≤ c \ a) (hac : a ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le hac <| h.trans sdiff_le
#align sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ c \ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (h.trans sdiff_le) hbc
#align sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_eq_bot_iff : a \ b = ⊥ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← le_bot_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_bot_eq]
#align sdiff_eq_bot_iff sdiff_eq_bot_iff
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_bot : a \ ⊥ = a :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun b => by rw [sdiff_le_iff, bot_sup_eq]
#align sdiff_bot sdiff_bot
@[simp]
theorem bot_sdiff : ⊥ \ a = ⊥ :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 bot_le
#align bot_sdiff bot_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff : (a \ b) \ (a \ c) ≤ c \ b := by
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_left_comm, sdiff_sup_self,
sup_left_comm]
exact le_sup_left
#align sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 553 | 554 | theorem le_sup_sdiff_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ (a \ c ⊔ c \ b) := by |
simpa using @sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.Basic
open Filter Set
open scoped ENNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α β F : Type*} [FunLike F (Set α) ℝ≥0∞] [OuterMeasureClass F α] {μ : F} {s t : Set α}
def ae (μ : F) : Filter α :=
.ofCountableUnion (μ · = 0) (fun _S hSc ↦ (measure_sUnion_null_iff hSc).2) fun _t ht _s hs ↦
measure_mono_null hs ht
#align measure_theory.measure.ae MeasureTheory.ae
notation3 "∀ᵐ "(...)" ∂"μ", "r:(scoped p => Filter.Eventually p <| MeasureTheory.ae μ) => r
notation3 "∃ᵐ "(...)" ∂"μ", "r:(scoped P => Filter.Frequently P <| MeasureTheory.ae μ) => r
notation:50 f " =ᵐ[" μ:50 "] " g:50 => Filter.EventuallyEq (MeasureTheory.ae μ) f g
notation:50 f " ≤ᵐ[" μ:50 "] " g:50 => Filter.EventuallyLE (MeasureTheory.ae μ) f g
theorem mem_ae_iff {s : Set α} : s ∈ ae μ ↔ μ sᶜ = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
#align measure_theory.mem_ae_iff MeasureTheory.mem_ae_iff
theorem ae_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᵐ a ∂μ, p a) ↔ μ { a | ¬p a } = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
#align measure_theory.ae_iff MeasureTheory.ae_iff
theorem compl_mem_ae_iff {s : Set α} : sᶜ ∈ ae μ ↔ μ s = 0 := by simp only [mem_ae_iff, compl_compl]
#align measure_theory.compl_mem_ae_iff MeasureTheory.compl_mem_ae_iff
theorem frequently_ae_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᵐ a ∂μ, p a) ↔ μ { a | p a } ≠ 0 :=
not_congr compl_mem_ae_iff
#align measure_theory.frequently_ae_iff MeasureTheory.frequently_ae_iff
theorem frequently_ae_mem_iff {s : Set α} : (∃ᵐ a ∂μ, a ∈ s) ↔ μ s ≠ 0 :=
not_congr compl_mem_ae_iff
#align measure_theory.frequently_ae_mem_iff MeasureTheory.frequently_ae_mem_iff
theorem measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem {s : Set α} : μ s = 0 ↔ ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, a ∉ s :=
compl_mem_ae_iff.symm
#align measure_theory.measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem MeasureTheory.measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem
theorem ae_of_all {p : α → Prop} (μ : F) : (∀ a, p a) → ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, p a :=
eventually_of_forall
#align measure_theory.ae_of_all MeasureTheory.ae_of_all
instance instCountableInterFilter : CountableInterFilter (ae μ) := by
unfold ae; infer_instance
#align measure_theory.measure.ae.countable_Inter_filter MeasureTheory.instCountableInterFilter
theorem ae_all_iff {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] {p : α → ι → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ i, p a i) ↔ ∀ i, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, p a i :=
eventually_countable_forall
#align measure_theory.ae_all_iff MeasureTheory.ae_all_iff
theorem all_ae_of {ι : Sort*} {p : α → ι → Prop} (hp : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ i, p a i) (i : ι) :
∀ᵐ a ∂μ, p a i := by
filter_upwards [hp] with a ha using ha i
lemma ae_iff_of_countable [Countable α] {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x) ↔ ∀ x, μ {x} ≠ 0 → p x := by
rw [ae_iff, measure_null_iff_singleton]
exacts [forall_congr' fun _ ↦ not_imp_comm, Set.to_countable _]
theorem ae_ball_iff {ι : Type*} {S : Set ι} (hS : S.Countable) {p : α → ∀ i ∈ S, Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ i (hi : i ∈ S), p x i hi) ↔ ∀ i (hi : i ∈ S), ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x i hi :=
eventually_countable_ball hS
#align measure_theory.ae_ball_iff MeasureTheory.ae_ball_iff
theorem ae_eq_refl (f : α → β) : f =ᵐ[μ] f :=
EventuallyEq.rfl
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_refl MeasureTheory.ae_eq_refl
theorem ae_eq_symm {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : g =ᵐ[μ] f :=
h.symm
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_symm MeasureTheory.ae_eq_symm
theorem ae_eq_trans {f g h : α → β} (h₁ : f =ᵐ[μ] g) (h₂ : g =ᵐ[μ] h) : f =ᵐ[μ] h :=
h₁.trans h₂
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_trans MeasureTheory.ae_eq_trans
theorem ae_le_of_ae_lt {β : Type*} [Preorder β] {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x < g x) :
f ≤ᵐ[μ] g :=
h.mono fun _ ↦ le_of_lt
#align measure_theory.ae_le_of_ae_lt MeasureTheory.ae_le_of_ae_lt
@[simp]
theorem ae_eq_empty : s =ᵐ[μ] (∅ : Set α) ↔ μ s = 0 :=
eventuallyEq_empty.trans <| by simp only [ae_iff, Classical.not_not, setOf_mem_eq]
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_empty MeasureTheory.ae_eq_empty
-- Porting note: The priority should be higher than `eventuallyEq_univ`.
@[simp high]
theorem ae_eq_univ : s =ᵐ[μ] (univ : Set α) ↔ μ sᶜ = 0 :=
eventuallyEq_univ
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_univ MeasureTheory.ae_eq_univ
theorem ae_le_set : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t ↔ μ (s \ t) = 0 :=
calc
s ≤ᵐ[μ] t ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → x ∈ t := Iff.rfl
_ ↔ μ (s \ t) = 0 := by simp [ae_iff]; rfl
#align measure_theory.ae_le_set MeasureTheory.ae_le_set
theorem ae_le_set_inter {s' t' : Set α} (h : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) (h' : s' ≤ᵐ[μ] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) ≤ᵐ[μ] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'
#align measure_theory.ae_le_set_inter MeasureTheory.ae_le_set_inter
theorem ae_le_set_union {s' t' : Set α} (h : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) (h' : s' ≤ᵐ[μ] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) ≤ᵐ[μ] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h.union h'
#align measure_theory.ae_le_set_union MeasureTheory.ae_le_set_union
theorem union_ae_eq_right : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] t ↔ μ (s \ t) = 0 := by
simp [eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff, ae_le_set, union_diff_right,
diff_eq_empty.2 Set.subset_union_right]
#align measure_theory.union_ae_eq_right MeasureTheory.union_ae_eq_right
theorem diff_ae_eq_self : (s \ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] s ↔ μ (s ∩ t) = 0 := by
simp [eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff, ae_le_set, diff_diff_right, diff_diff,
diff_eq_empty.2 Set.subset_union_right]
#align measure_theory.diff_ae_eq_self MeasureTheory.diff_ae_eq_self
theorem diff_null_ae_eq_self (ht : μ t = 0) : (s \ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] s :=
diff_ae_eq_self.mpr (measure_mono_null inter_subset_right ht)
#align measure_theory.diff_null_ae_eq_self MeasureTheory.diff_null_ae_eq_self
theorem ae_eq_set {s t : Set α} : s =ᵐ[μ] t ↔ μ (s \ t) = 0 ∧ μ (t \ s) = 0 := by
simp [eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff, ae_le_set]
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_set MeasureTheory.ae_eq_set
open scoped symmDiff in
@[simp]
theorem measure_symmDiff_eq_zero_iff {s t : Set α} : μ (s ∆ t) = 0 ↔ s =ᵐ[μ] t := by
simp [ae_eq_set, symmDiff_def]
#align measure_theory.measure_symm_diff_eq_zero_iff MeasureTheory.measure_symmDiff_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem ae_eq_set_compl_compl {s t : Set α} : sᶜ =ᵐ[μ] tᶜ ↔ s =ᵐ[μ] t := by
simp only [← measure_symmDiff_eq_zero_iff, compl_symmDiff_compl]
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_set_compl_compl MeasureTheory.ae_eq_set_compl_compl
theorem ae_eq_set_compl {s t : Set α} : sᶜ =ᵐ[μ] t ↔ s =ᵐ[μ] tᶜ := by
rw [← ae_eq_set_compl_compl, compl_compl]
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_set_compl MeasureTheory.ae_eq_set_compl
theorem ae_eq_set_inter {s' t' : Set α} (h : s =ᵐ[μ] t) (h' : s' =ᵐ[μ] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_set_inter MeasureTheory.ae_eq_set_inter
theorem ae_eq_set_union {s' t' : Set α} (h : s =ᵐ[μ] t) (h' : s' =ᵐ[μ] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h.union h'
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_set_union MeasureTheory.ae_eq_set_union
theorem union_ae_eq_univ_of_ae_eq_univ_left (h : s =ᵐ[μ] univ) : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] univ :=
(ae_eq_set_union h (ae_eq_refl t)).trans <| by rw [univ_union]
#align measure_theory.union_ae_eq_univ_of_ae_eq_univ_left MeasureTheory.union_ae_eq_univ_of_ae_eq_univ_left
theorem union_ae_eq_univ_of_ae_eq_univ_right (h : t =ᵐ[μ] univ) : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] univ := by
convert ae_eq_set_union (ae_eq_refl s) h
rw [union_univ]
#align measure_theory.union_ae_eq_univ_of_ae_eq_univ_right MeasureTheory.union_ae_eq_univ_of_ae_eq_univ_right
theorem union_ae_eq_right_of_ae_eq_empty (h : s =ᵐ[μ] (∅ : Set α)) : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] t := by
convert ae_eq_set_union h (ae_eq_refl t)
rw [empty_union]
#align measure_theory.union_ae_eq_right_of_ae_eq_empty MeasureTheory.union_ae_eq_right_of_ae_eq_empty
theorem union_ae_eq_left_of_ae_eq_empty (h : t =ᵐ[μ] (∅ : Set α)) : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] s := by
convert ae_eq_set_union (ae_eq_refl s) h
rw [union_empty]
#align measure_theory.union_ae_eq_left_of_ae_eq_empty MeasureTheory.union_ae_eq_left_of_ae_eq_empty
theorem inter_ae_eq_right_of_ae_eq_univ (h : s =ᵐ[μ] univ) : (s ∩ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] t := by
convert ae_eq_set_inter h (ae_eq_refl t)
rw [univ_inter]
#align measure_theory.inter_ae_eq_right_of_ae_eq_univ MeasureTheory.inter_ae_eq_right_of_ae_eq_univ
theorem inter_ae_eq_left_of_ae_eq_univ (h : t =ᵐ[μ] univ) : (s ∩ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] s := by
convert ae_eq_set_inter (ae_eq_refl s) h
rw [inter_univ]
#align measure_theory.inter_ae_eq_left_of_ae_eq_univ MeasureTheory.inter_ae_eq_left_of_ae_eq_univ
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/AE.lean | 236 | 239 | theorem inter_ae_eq_empty_of_ae_eq_empty_left (h : s =ᵐ[μ] (∅ : Set α)) :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] (∅ : Set α) := by |
convert ae_eq_set_inter h (ae_eq_refl t)
rw [empty_inter]
|
import Mathlib.Order.Atoms
import Mathlib.Order.OrderIsoNat
import Mathlib.Order.RelIso.Set
import Mathlib.Order.SupClosed
import Mathlib.Order.SupIndep
import Mathlib.Order.Zorn
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Order
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.OrderIso
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Set
import Mathlib.Tactic.TFAE
#align_import order.compactly_generated from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c813ed7de0f5115f956239124e9b30f3a621966f"
open Set
variable {ι : Sort*} {α : Type*} [CompleteLattice α] {f : ι → α}
namespace CompleteLattice
variable (α)
def IsSupClosedCompact : Prop :=
∀ (s : Set α) (_ : s.Nonempty), SupClosed s → sSup s ∈ s
#align complete_lattice.is_sup_closed_compact CompleteLattice.IsSupClosedCompact
def IsSupFiniteCompact : Prop :=
∀ s : Set α, ∃ t : Finset α, ↑t ⊆ s ∧ sSup s = t.sup id
#align complete_lattice.is_Sup_finite_compact CompleteLattice.IsSupFiniteCompact
def IsCompactElement {α : Type*} [CompleteLattice α] (k : α) :=
∀ s : Set α, k ≤ sSup s → ∃ t : Finset α, ↑t ⊆ s ∧ k ≤ t.sup id
#align complete_lattice.is_compact_element CompleteLattice.IsCompactElement
theorem isCompactElement_iff.{u} {α : Type u} [CompleteLattice α] (k : α) :
CompleteLattice.IsCompactElement k ↔
∀ (ι : Type u) (s : ι → α), k ≤ iSup s → ∃ t : Finset ι, k ≤ t.sup s := by
classical
constructor
· intro H ι s hs
obtain ⟨t, ht, ht'⟩ := H (Set.range s) hs
have : ∀ x : t, ∃ i, s i = x := fun x => ht x.prop
choose f hf using this
refine ⟨Finset.univ.image f, ht'.trans ?_⟩
rw [Finset.sup_le_iff]
intro b hb
rw [← show s (f ⟨b, hb⟩) = id b from hf _]
exact Finset.le_sup (Finset.mem_image_of_mem f <| Finset.mem_univ (Subtype.mk b hb))
· intro H s hs
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ :=
H s Subtype.val
(by
delta iSup
rwa [Subtype.range_coe])
refine ⟨t.image Subtype.val, by simp, ht.trans ?_⟩
rw [Finset.sup_le_iff]
exact fun x hx => @Finset.le_sup _ _ _ _ _ id _ (Finset.mem_image_of_mem Subtype.val hx)
#align complete_lattice.is_compact_element_iff CompleteLattice.isCompactElement_iff
theorem isCompactElement_iff_le_of_directed_sSup_le (k : α) :
IsCompactElement k ↔
∀ s : Set α, s.Nonempty → DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) s → k ≤ sSup s → ∃ x : α, x ∈ s ∧ k ≤ x := by
classical
constructor
· intro hk s hne hdir hsup
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := hk s hsup
-- certainly every element of t is below something in s, since ↑t ⊆ s.
have t_below_s : ∀ x ∈ t, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≤ y := fun x hxt => ⟨x, ht.left hxt, le_rfl⟩
obtain ⟨x, ⟨hxs, hsupx⟩⟩ := Finset.sup_le_of_le_directed s hne hdir t t_below_s
exact ⟨x, ⟨hxs, le_trans ht.right hsupx⟩⟩
· intro hk s hsup
-- Consider the set of finite joins of elements of the (plain) set s.
let S : Set α := { x | ∃ t : Finset α, ↑t ⊆ s ∧ x = t.sup id }
-- S is directed, nonempty, and still has sup above k.
have dir_US : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) S := by
rintro x ⟨c, hc⟩ y ⟨d, hd⟩
use x ⊔ y
constructor
· use c ∪ d
constructor
· simp only [hc.left, hd.left, Set.union_subset_iff, Finset.coe_union, and_self_iff]
· simp only [hc.right, hd.right, Finset.sup_union]
simp only [and_self_iff, le_sup_left, le_sup_right]
have sup_S : sSup s ≤ sSup S := by
apply sSup_le_sSup
intro x hx
use {x}
simpa only [and_true_iff, id, Finset.coe_singleton, eq_self_iff_true,
Finset.sup_singleton, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
have Sne : S.Nonempty := by
suffices ⊥ ∈ S from Set.nonempty_of_mem this
use ∅
simp only [Set.empty_subset, Finset.coe_empty, Finset.sup_empty, eq_self_iff_true,
and_self_iff]
-- Now apply the defn of compact and finish.
obtain ⟨j, ⟨hjS, hjk⟩⟩ := hk S Sne dir_US (le_trans hsup sup_S)
obtain ⟨t, ⟨htS, htsup⟩⟩ := hjS
use t
exact ⟨htS, by rwa [← htsup]⟩
#align complete_lattice.is_compact_element_iff_le_of_directed_Sup_le CompleteLattice.isCompactElement_iff_le_of_directed_sSup_le
theorem IsCompactElement.exists_finset_of_le_iSup {k : α} (hk : IsCompactElement k) {ι : Type*}
(f : ι → α) (h : k ≤ ⨆ i, f i) : ∃ s : Finset ι, k ≤ ⨆ i ∈ s, f i := by
classical
let g : Finset ι → α := fun s => ⨆ i ∈ s, f i
have h1 : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) (Set.range g) := by
rintro - ⟨s, rfl⟩ - ⟨t, rfl⟩
exact
⟨g (s ∪ t), ⟨s ∪ t, rfl⟩, iSup_le_iSup_of_subset Finset.subset_union_left,
iSup_le_iSup_of_subset Finset.subset_union_right⟩
have h2 : k ≤ sSup (Set.range g) :=
h.trans
(iSup_le fun i =>
le_sSup_of_le ⟨{i}, rfl⟩
(le_iSup_of_le i (le_iSup_of_le (Finset.mem_singleton_self i) le_rfl)))
obtain ⟨-, ⟨s, rfl⟩, hs⟩ :=
(isCompactElement_iff_le_of_directed_sSup_le α k).mp hk (Set.range g) (Set.range_nonempty g)
h1 h2
exact ⟨s, hs⟩
#align complete_lattice.is_compact_element.exists_finset_of_le_supr CompleteLattice.IsCompactElement.exists_finset_of_le_iSup
theorem IsCompactElement.directed_sSup_lt_of_lt {α : Type*} [CompleteLattice α] {k : α}
(hk : IsCompactElement k) {s : Set α} (hemp : s.Nonempty) (hdir : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) s)
(hbelow : ∀ x ∈ s, x < k) : sSup s < k := by
rw [isCompactElement_iff_le_of_directed_sSup_le] at hk
by_contra h
have sSup' : sSup s ≤ k := sSup_le s k fun s hs => (hbelow s hs).le
replace sSup : sSup s = k := eq_iff_le_not_lt.mpr ⟨sSup', h⟩
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hkx⟩ := hk s hemp hdir sSup.symm.le
obtain hxk := hbelow x hxs
exact hxk.ne (hxk.le.antisymm hkx)
#align complete_lattice.is_compact_element.directed_Sup_lt_of_lt CompleteLattice.IsCompactElement.directed_sSup_lt_of_lt
theorem isCompactElement_finsetSup {α β : Type*} [CompleteLattice α] {f : β → α} (s : Finset β)
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, IsCompactElement (f x)) : IsCompactElement (s.sup f) := by
classical
rw [isCompactElement_iff_le_of_directed_sSup_le]
intro d hemp hdir hsup
rw [← Function.id_comp f]
rw [← Finset.sup_image]
apply Finset.sup_le_of_le_directed d hemp hdir
rintro x hx
obtain ⟨p, ⟨hps, rfl⟩⟩ := Finset.mem_image.mp hx
specialize h p hps
rw [isCompactElement_iff_le_of_directed_sSup_le] at h
specialize h d hemp hdir (le_trans (Finset.le_sup hps) hsup)
simpa only [exists_prop]
#align complete_lattice.finset_sup_compact_of_compact CompleteLattice.isCompactElement_finsetSup
theorem WellFounded.isSupFiniteCompact (h : WellFounded ((· > ·) : α → α → Prop)) :
IsSupFiniteCompact α := fun s => by
let S := { x | ∃ t : Finset α, ↑t ⊆ s ∧ t.sup id = x }
obtain ⟨m, ⟨t, ⟨ht₁, rfl⟩⟩, hm⟩ := h.has_min S ⟨⊥, ∅, by simp⟩
refine ⟨t, ht₁, (sSup_le _ _ fun y hy => ?_).antisymm ?_⟩
· classical
rw [eq_of_le_of_not_lt (Finset.sup_mono (t.subset_insert y))
(hm _ ⟨insert y t, by simp [Set.insert_subset_iff, hy, ht₁]⟩)]
simp
· rw [Finset.sup_id_eq_sSup]
exact sSup_le_sSup ht₁
#align complete_lattice.well_founded.is_Sup_finite_compact CompleteLattice.WellFounded.isSupFiniteCompact
theorem IsSupFiniteCompact.isSupClosedCompact (h : IsSupFiniteCompact α) :
IsSupClosedCompact α := by
intro s hne hsc; obtain ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := h s; clear h
rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· subst h
rw [Finset.sup_empty] at ht₂
rw [ht₂]
simp [eq_singleton_bot_of_sSup_eq_bot_of_nonempty ht₂ hne]
· rw [ht₂]
exact hsc.finsetSup_mem h ht₁
#align complete_lattice.is_Sup_finite_compact.is_sup_closed_compact CompleteLattice.IsSupFiniteCompact.isSupClosedCompact
theorem IsSupClosedCompact.wellFounded (h : IsSupClosedCompact α) :
WellFounded ((· > ·) : α → α → Prop) := by
refine RelEmbedding.wellFounded_iff_no_descending_seq.mpr ⟨fun a => ?_⟩
suffices sSup (Set.range a) ∈ Set.range a by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := Set.mem_range.mp this
have h' : sSup (Set.range a) < a (n + 1) := by
change _ > _
simp [← hn, a.map_rel_iff]
apply lt_irrefl (a (n + 1))
apply lt_of_le_of_lt _ h'
apply le_sSup
apply Set.mem_range_self
apply h (Set.range a)
· use a 37
apply Set.mem_range_self
· rintro x ⟨m, hm⟩ y ⟨n, hn⟩
use m ⊔ n
rw [← hm, ← hn]
apply RelHomClass.map_sup a
#align complete_lattice.is_sup_closed_compact.well_founded CompleteLattice.IsSupClosedCompact.wellFounded
| Mathlib/Order/CompactlyGenerated/Basic.lean | 248 | 260 | theorem isSupFiniteCompact_iff_all_elements_compact :
IsSupFiniteCompact α ↔ ∀ k : α, IsCompactElement k := by |
refine ⟨fun h k s hs => ?_, fun h s => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨t, ⟨hts, htsup⟩⟩ := h s
use t, hts
rwa [← htsup]
· obtain ⟨t, ⟨hts, htsup⟩⟩ := h (sSup s) s (by rfl)
have : sSup s = t.sup id := by
suffices t.sup id ≤ sSup s by apply le_antisymm <;> assumption
simp only [id, Finset.sup_le_iff]
intro x hx
exact le_sSup _ _ (hts hx)
exact ⟨t, hts, this⟩
|
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Subgraph
import Mathlib.Data.List.Rotate
#align_import combinatorics.simple_graph.connectivity from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b99e2d58a5e6861833fa8de11e51a81144258db4"
open Function
universe u v w
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type u} {V' : Type v} {V'' : Type w}
variable (G : SimpleGraph V) (G' : SimpleGraph V') (G'' : SimpleGraph V'')
inductive Walk : V → V → Type u
| nil {u : V} : Walk u u
| cons {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : Walk v w) : Walk u w
deriving DecidableEq
#align simple_graph.walk SimpleGraph.Walk
attribute [refl] Walk.nil
@[simps]
instance Walk.instInhabited (v : V) : Inhabited (G.Walk v v) := ⟨Walk.nil⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.inhabited SimpleGraph.Walk.instInhabited
@[match_pattern, reducible]
def Adj.toWalk {G : SimpleGraph V} {u v : V} (h : G.Adj u v) : G.Walk u v :=
Walk.cons h Walk.nil
#align simple_graph.adj.to_walk SimpleGraph.Adj.toWalk
namespace Walk
variable {G}
@[match_pattern]
abbrev nil' (u : V) : G.Walk u u := Walk.nil
#align simple_graph.walk.nil' SimpleGraph.Walk.nil'
@[match_pattern]
abbrev cons' (u v w : V) (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) : G.Walk u w := Walk.cons h p
#align simple_graph.walk.cons' SimpleGraph.Walk.cons'
protected def copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') : G.Walk u' v' :=
hu ▸ hv ▸ p
#align simple_graph.walk.copy SimpleGraph.Walk.copy
@[simp]
theorem copy_rfl_rfl {u v} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.copy rfl rfl = p := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.copy_rfl_rfl SimpleGraph.Walk.copy_rfl_rfl
@[simp]
theorem copy_copy {u v u' v' u'' v''} (p : G.Walk u v)
(hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') (hu' : u' = u'') (hv' : v' = v'') :
(p.copy hu hv).copy hu' hv' = p.copy (hu.trans hu') (hv.trans hv') := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.copy_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.copy_copy
@[simp]
theorem copy_nil {u u'} (hu : u = u') : (Walk.nil : G.Walk u u).copy hu hu = Walk.nil := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.copy_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.copy_nil
theorem copy_cons {u v w u' w'} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) (hu : u = u') (hw : w = w') :
(Walk.cons h p).copy hu hw = Walk.cons (hu ▸ h) (p.copy rfl hw) := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.copy_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.copy_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_copy {u v w v' w'} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v' w') (hv : v' = v) (hw : w' = w) :
Walk.cons h (p.copy hv hw) = (Walk.cons (hv ▸ h) p).copy rfl hw := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_copy
theorem exists_eq_cons_of_ne {u v : V} (hne : u ≠ v) :
∀ (p : G.Walk u v), ∃ (w : V) (h : G.Adj u w) (p' : G.Walk w v), p = cons h p'
| nil => (hne rfl).elim
| cons h p' => ⟨_, h, p', rfl⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.exists_eq_cons_of_ne SimpleGraph.Walk.exists_eq_cons_of_ne
def length {u v : V} : G.Walk u v → ℕ
| nil => 0
| cons _ q => q.length.succ
#align simple_graph.walk.length SimpleGraph.Walk.length
@[trans]
def append {u v w : V} : G.Walk u v → G.Walk v w → G.Walk u w
| nil, q => q
| cons h p, q => cons h (p.append q)
#align simple_graph.walk.append SimpleGraph.Walk.append
def concat {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) : G.Walk u w := p.append (cons h nil)
#align simple_graph.walk.concat SimpleGraph.Walk.concat
theorem concat_eq_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) :
p.concat h = p.append (cons h nil) := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_eq_append SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_eq_append
protected def reverseAux {u v w : V} : G.Walk u v → G.Walk u w → G.Walk v w
| nil, q => q
| cons h p, q => Walk.reverseAux p (cons (G.symm h) q)
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_aux SimpleGraph.Walk.reverseAux
@[symm]
def reverse {u v : V} (w : G.Walk u v) : G.Walk v u := w.reverseAux nil
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse
def getVert {u v : V} : G.Walk u v → ℕ → V
| nil, _ => u
| cons _ _, 0 => u
| cons _ q, n + 1 => q.getVert n
#align simple_graph.walk.get_vert SimpleGraph.Walk.getVert
@[simp]
theorem getVert_zero {u v} (w : G.Walk u v) : w.getVert 0 = u := by cases w <;> rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.get_vert_zero SimpleGraph.Walk.getVert_zero
theorem getVert_of_length_le {u v} (w : G.Walk u v) {i : ℕ} (hi : w.length ≤ i) :
w.getVert i = v := by
induction w generalizing i with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih =>
cases i
· cases hi
· exact ih (Nat.succ_le_succ_iff.1 hi)
#align simple_graph.walk.get_vert_of_length_le SimpleGraph.Walk.getVert_of_length_le
@[simp]
theorem getVert_length {u v} (w : G.Walk u v) : w.getVert w.length = v :=
w.getVert_of_length_le rfl.le
#align simple_graph.walk.get_vert_length SimpleGraph.Walk.getVert_length
theorem adj_getVert_succ {u v} (w : G.Walk u v) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < w.length) :
G.Adj (w.getVert i) (w.getVert (i + 1)) := by
induction w generalizing i with
| nil => cases hi
| cons hxy _ ih =>
cases i
· simp [getVert, hxy]
· exact ih (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.1 hi)
#align simple_graph.walk.adj_get_vert_succ SimpleGraph.Walk.adj_getVert_succ
@[simp]
theorem cons_append {u v w x : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) (q : G.Walk w x) :
(cons h p).append q = cons h (p.append q) := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_append SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_append
@[simp]
theorem cons_nil_append {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h nil).append p = cons h p := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_nil_append SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_nil_append
@[simp]
theorem append_nil {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.append nil = p := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => rw [cons_append, ih]
#align simple_graph.walk.append_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.append_nil
@[simp]
theorem nil_append {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : nil.append p = p :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.nil_append SimpleGraph.Walk.nil_append
theorem append_assoc {u v w x : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) (r : G.Walk w x) :
p.append (q.append r) = (p.append q).append r := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons h p' ih =>
dsimp only [append]
rw [ih]
#align simple_graph.walk.append_assoc SimpleGraph.Walk.append_assoc
@[simp]
theorem append_copy_copy {u v w u' v' w'} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w)
(hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') (hw : w = w') :
(p.copy hu hv).append (q.copy hv hw) = (p.append q).copy hu hw := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.append_copy_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.append_copy_copy
theorem concat_nil {u v : V} (h : G.Adj u v) : nil.concat h = cons h nil := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_nil
@[simp]
theorem concat_cons {u v w x : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) (h' : G.Adj w x) :
(cons h p).concat h' = cons h (p.concat h') := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_cons
theorem append_concat {u v w x : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) (h : G.Adj w x) :
p.append (q.concat h) = (p.append q).concat h := append_assoc _ _ _
#align simple_graph.walk.append_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.append_concat
theorem concat_append {u v w x : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) (q : G.Walk w x) :
(p.concat h).append q = p.append (cons h q) := by
rw [concat_eq_append, ← append_assoc, cons_nil_append]
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_append SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_append
theorem exists_cons_eq_concat {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
∃ (x : V) (q : G.Walk u x) (h' : G.Adj x w), cons h p = q.concat h' := by
induction p generalizing u with
| nil => exact ⟨_, nil, h, rfl⟩
| cons h' p ih =>
obtain ⟨y, q, h'', hc⟩ := ih h'
refine ⟨y, cons h q, h'', ?_⟩
rw [concat_cons, hc]
#align simple_graph.walk.exists_cons_eq_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.exists_cons_eq_concat
theorem exists_concat_eq_cons {u v w : V} :
∀ (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w),
∃ (x : V) (h' : G.Adj u x) (q : G.Walk x w), p.concat h = cons h' q
| nil, h => ⟨_, h, nil, rfl⟩
| cons h' p, h => ⟨_, h', Walk.concat p h, concat_cons _ _ _⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.exists_concat_eq_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.exists_concat_eq_cons
@[simp]
theorem reverse_nil {u : V} : (nil : G.Walk u u).reverse = nil := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_nil
theorem reverse_singleton {u v : V} (h : G.Adj u v) : (cons h nil).reverse = cons (G.symm h) nil :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_singleton SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_singleton
@[simp]
theorem cons_reverseAux {u v w x : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk w x) (h : G.Adj w u) :
(cons h p).reverseAux q = p.reverseAux (cons (G.symm h) q) := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_reverse_aux SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_reverseAux
@[simp]
protected theorem append_reverseAux {u v w x : V}
(p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) (r : G.Walk u x) :
(p.append q).reverseAux r = q.reverseAux (p.reverseAux r) := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons h _ ih => exact ih q (cons (G.symm h) r)
#align simple_graph.walk.append_reverse_aux SimpleGraph.Walk.append_reverseAux
@[simp]
protected theorem reverseAux_append {u v w x : V}
(p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk u w) (r : G.Walk w x) :
(p.reverseAux q).append r = p.reverseAux (q.append r) := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons h _ ih => simp [ih (cons (G.symm h) q)]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_aux_append SimpleGraph.Walk.reverseAux_append
protected theorem reverseAux_eq_reverse_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk u w) :
p.reverseAux q = p.reverse.append q := by simp [reverse]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_aux_eq_reverse_append SimpleGraph.Walk.reverseAux_eq_reverse_append
@[simp]
theorem reverse_cons {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h p).reverse = p.reverse.append (cons (G.symm h) nil) := by simp [reverse]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_cons
@[simp]
theorem reverse_copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).reverse = p.reverse.copy hv hu := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_copy
@[simp]
theorem reverse_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) :
(p.append q).reverse = q.reverse.append p.reverse := by simp [reverse]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_append SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_append
@[simp]
theorem reverse_concat {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) :
(p.concat h).reverse = cons (G.symm h) p.reverse := by simp [concat_eq_append]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_concat
@[simp]
theorem reverse_reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.reverse.reverse = p := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => simp [ih]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_reverse
@[simp]
theorem length_nil {u : V} : (nil : G.Walk u u).length = 0 := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.length_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.length_nil
@[simp]
theorem length_cons {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h p).length = p.length + 1 := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.length_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.length_cons
@[simp]
theorem length_copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).length = p.length := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.length_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.length_copy
@[simp]
theorem length_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) :
(p.append q).length = p.length + q.length := by
induction p with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ ih => simp [ih, add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc]
#align simple_graph.walk.length_append SimpleGraph.Walk.length_append
@[simp]
theorem length_concat {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) :
(p.concat h).length = p.length + 1 := length_append _ _
#align simple_graph.walk.length_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.length_concat
@[simp]
protected theorem length_reverseAux {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk u w) :
(p.reverseAux q).length = p.length + q.length := by
induction p with
| nil => simp!
| cons _ _ ih => simp [ih, Nat.succ_add, Nat.add_assoc]
#align simple_graph.walk.length_reverse_aux SimpleGraph.Walk.length_reverseAux
@[simp]
theorem length_reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.reverse.length = p.length := by simp [reverse]
#align simple_graph.walk.length_reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.length_reverse
theorem eq_of_length_eq_zero {u v : V} : ∀ {p : G.Walk u v}, p.length = 0 → u = v
| nil, _ => rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.eq_of_length_eq_zero SimpleGraph.Walk.eq_of_length_eq_zero
theorem adj_of_length_eq_one {u v : V} : ∀ {p : G.Walk u v}, p.length = 1 → G.Adj u v
| cons h nil, _ => h
@[simp]
theorem exists_length_eq_zero_iff {u v : V} : (∃ p : G.Walk u v, p.length = 0) ↔ u = v := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p, hp⟩
exact eq_of_length_eq_zero hp
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨nil, rfl⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.exists_length_eq_zero_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.exists_length_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem length_eq_zero_iff {u : V} {p : G.Walk u u} : p.length = 0 ↔ p = nil := by cases p <;> simp
#align simple_graph.walk.length_eq_zero_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.length_eq_zero_iff
theorem getVert_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) (i : ℕ) :
(p.append q).getVert i = if i < p.length then p.getVert i else q.getVert (i - p.length) := by
induction p generalizing i with
| nil => simp
| cons h p ih => cases i <;> simp [getVert, ih, Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff]
theorem getVert_reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (i : ℕ) :
p.reverse.getVert i = p.getVert (p.length - i) := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons h p ih =>
simp only [reverse_cons, getVert_append, length_reverse, ih, length_cons]
split_ifs
next hi =>
rw [Nat.succ_sub hi.le]
simp [getVert]
next hi =>
obtain rfl | hi' := Nat.eq_or_lt_of_not_lt hi
· simp [getVert]
· rw [Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt hi') rfl, Nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le hi']
simp [getVert]
theorem concat_ne_nil {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v u) : p.concat h ≠ nil := by
cases p <;> simp [concat]
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_ne_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_ne_nil
theorem concat_inj {u v v' w : V} {p : G.Walk u v} {h : G.Adj v w} {p' : G.Walk u v'}
{h' : G.Adj v' w} (he : p.concat h = p'.concat h') : ∃ hv : v = v', p.copy rfl hv = p' := by
induction p with
| nil =>
cases p'
· exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
· exfalso
simp only [concat_nil, concat_cons, cons.injEq] at he
obtain ⟨rfl, he⟩ := he
simp only [heq_iff_eq] at he
exact concat_ne_nil _ _ he.symm
| cons _ _ ih =>
rw [concat_cons] at he
cases p'
· exfalso
simp only [concat_nil, cons.injEq] at he
obtain ⟨rfl, he⟩ := he
rw [heq_iff_eq] at he
exact concat_ne_nil _ _ he
· rw [concat_cons, cons.injEq] at he
obtain ⟨rfl, he⟩ := he
rw [heq_iff_eq] at he
obtain ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ := ih he
exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_inj SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_inj
def support {u v : V} : G.Walk u v → List V
| nil => [u]
| cons _ p => u :: p.support
#align simple_graph.walk.support SimpleGraph.Walk.support
def darts {u v : V} : G.Walk u v → List G.Dart
| nil => []
| cons h p => ⟨(u, _), h⟩ :: p.darts
#align simple_graph.walk.darts SimpleGraph.Walk.darts
def edges {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : List (Sym2 V) := p.darts.map Dart.edge
#align simple_graph.walk.edges SimpleGraph.Walk.edges
@[simp]
theorem support_nil {u : V} : (nil : G.Walk u u).support = [u] := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.support_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.support_nil
@[simp]
theorem support_cons {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h p).support = u :: p.support := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.support_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.support_cons
@[simp]
theorem support_concat {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) :
(p.concat h).support = p.support.concat w := by
induction p <;> simp [*, concat_nil]
#align simple_graph.walk.support_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.support_concat
@[simp]
theorem support_copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).support = p.support := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.support_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.support_copy
theorem support_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
(p.append p').support = p.support ++ p'.support.tail := by
induction p <;> cases p' <;> simp [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.support_append SimpleGraph.Walk.support_append
@[simp]
theorem support_reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.reverse.support = p.support.reverse := by
induction p <;> simp [support_append, *]
#align simple_graph.walk.support_reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.support_reverse
@[simp]
theorem support_ne_nil {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.support ≠ [] := by cases p <;> simp
#align simple_graph.walk.support_ne_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.support_ne_nil
theorem tail_support_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
(p.append p').support.tail = p.support.tail ++ p'.support.tail := by
rw [support_append, List.tail_append_of_ne_nil _ _ (support_ne_nil _)]
#align simple_graph.walk.tail_support_append SimpleGraph.Walk.tail_support_append
theorem support_eq_cons {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.support = u :: p.support.tail := by
cases p <;> simp
#align simple_graph.walk.support_eq_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.support_eq_cons
@[simp]
theorem start_mem_support {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : u ∈ p.support := by cases p <;> simp
#align simple_graph.walk.start_mem_support SimpleGraph.Walk.start_mem_support
@[simp]
theorem end_mem_support {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : v ∈ p.support := by induction p <;> simp [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.end_mem_support SimpleGraph.Walk.end_mem_support
@[simp]
theorem support_nonempty {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : { w | w ∈ p.support }.Nonempty :=
⟨u, by simp⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.support_nonempty SimpleGraph.Walk.support_nonempty
theorem mem_support_iff {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) :
w ∈ p.support ↔ w = u ∨ w ∈ p.support.tail := by cases p <;> simp
#align simple_graph.walk.mem_support_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.mem_support_iff
theorem mem_support_nil_iff {u v : V} : u ∈ (nil : G.Walk v v).support ↔ u = v := by simp
#align simple_graph.walk.mem_support_nil_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.mem_support_nil_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_tail_support_append_iff {t u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
t ∈ (p.append p').support.tail ↔ t ∈ p.support.tail ∨ t ∈ p'.support.tail := by
rw [tail_support_append, List.mem_append]
#align simple_graph.walk.mem_tail_support_append_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.mem_tail_support_append_iff
@[simp]
theorem end_mem_tail_support_of_ne {u v : V} (h : u ≠ v) (p : G.Walk u v) : v ∈ p.support.tail := by
obtain ⟨_, _, _, rfl⟩ := exists_eq_cons_of_ne h p
simp
#align simple_graph.walk.end_mem_tail_support_of_ne SimpleGraph.Walk.end_mem_tail_support_of_ne
@[simp, nolint unusedHavesSuffices]
theorem mem_support_append_iff {t u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
t ∈ (p.append p').support ↔ t ∈ p.support ∨ t ∈ p'.support := by
simp only [mem_support_iff, mem_tail_support_append_iff]
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne t v <;> obtain rfl | h' := eq_or_ne t u <;>
-- this `have` triggers the unusedHavesSuffices linter:
(try have := h'.symm) <;> simp [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.mem_support_append_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.mem_support_append_iff
@[simp]
theorem subset_support_append_left {V : Type u} {G : SimpleGraph V} {u v w : V}
(p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) : p.support ⊆ (p.append q).support := by
simp only [Walk.support_append, List.subset_append_left]
#align simple_graph.walk.subset_support_append_left SimpleGraph.Walk.subset_support_append_left
@[simp]
theorem subset_support_append_right {V : Type u} {G : SimpleGraph V} {u v w : V}
(p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) : q.support ⊆ (p.append q).support := by
intro h
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [mem_support_append_iff, or_true_iff, imp_true_iff]
#align simple_graph.walk.subset_support_append_right SimpleGraph.Walk.subset_support_append_right
theorem coe_support {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) :
(p.support : Multiset V) = {u} + p.support.tail := by cases p <;> rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.coe_support SimpleGraph.Walk.coe_support
theorem coe_support_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
((p.append p').support : Multiset V) = {u} + p.support.tail + p'.support.tail := by
rw [support_append, ← Multiset.coe_add, coe_support]
#align simple_graph.walk.coe_support_append SimpleGraph.Walk.coe_support_append
theorem coe_support_append' [DecidableEq V] {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
((p.append p').support : Multiset V) = p.support + p'.support - {v} := by
rw [support_append, ← Multiset.coe_add]
simp only [coe_support]
rw [add_comm ({v} : Multiset V)]
simp only [← add_assoc, add_tsub_cancel_right]
#align simple_graph.walk.coe_support_append' SimpleGraph.Walk.coe_support_append'
theorem chain_adj_support {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) :
∀ (p : G.Walk v w), List.Chain G.Adj u p.support
| nil => List.Chain.cons h List.Chain.nil
| cons h' p => List.Chain.cons h (chain_adj_support h' p)
#align simple_graph.walk.chain_adj_support SimpleGraph.Walk.chain_adj_support
theorem chain'_adj_support {u v : V} : ∀ (p : G.Walk u v), List.Chain' G.Adj p.support
| nil => List.Chain.nil
| cons h p => chain_adj_support h p
#align simple_graph.walk.chain'_adj_support SimpleGraph.Walk.chain'_adj_support
theorem chain_dartAdj_darts {d : G.Dart} {v w : V} (h : d.snd = v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
List.Chain G.DartAdj d p.darts := by
induction p generalizing d with
| nil => exact List.Chain.nil
-- Porting note: needed to defer `h` and `rfl` to help elaboration
| cons h' p ih => exact List.Chain.cons (by exact h) (ih (by rfl))
#align simple_graph.walk.chain_dart_adj_darts SimpleGraph.Walk.chain_dartAdj_darts
theorem chain'_dartAdj_darts {u v : V} : ∀ (p : G.Walk u v), List.Chain' G.DartAdj p.darts
| nil => trivial
-- Porting note: needed to defer `rfl` to help elaboration
| cons h p => chain_dartAdj_darts (by rfl) p
#align simple_graph.walk.chain'_dart_adj_darts SimpleGraph.Walk.chain'_dartAdj_darts
theorem edges_subset_edgeSet {u v : V} :
∀ (p : G.Walk u v) ⦃e : Sym2 V⦄, e ∈ p.edges → e ∈ G.edgeSet
| cons h' p', e, h => by
cases h
· exact h'
next h' => exact edges_subset_edgeSet p' h'
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_subset_edge_set SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_subset_edgeSet
theorem adj_of_mem_edges {u v x y : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : s(x, y) ∈ p.edges) : G.Adj x y :=
edges_subset_edgeSet p h
#align simple_graph.walk.adj_of_mem_edges SimpleGraph.Walk.adj_of_mem_edges
@[simp]
theorem darts_nil {u : V} : (nil : G.Walk u u).darts = [] := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.darts_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.darts_nil
@[simp]
theorem darts_cons {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h p).darts = ⟨(u, v), h⟩ :: p.darts := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.darts_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.darts_cons
@[simp]
theorem darts_concat {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) :
(p.concat h).darts = p.darts.concat ⟨(v, w), h⟩ := by
induction p <;> simp [*, concat_nil]
#align simple_graph.walk.darts_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.darts_concat
@[simp]
theorem darts_copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).darts = p.darts := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.darts_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.darts_copy
@[simp]
theorem darts_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
(p.append p').darts = p.darts ++ p'.darts := by
induction p <;> simp [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.darts_append SimpleGraph.Walk.darts_append
@[simp]
theorem darts_reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) :
p.reverse.darts = (p.darts.map Dart.symm).reverse := by
induction p <;> simp [*, Sym2.eq_swap]
#align simple_graph.walk.darts_reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.darts_reverse
theorem mem_darts_reverse {u v : V} {d : G.Dart} {p : G.Walk u v} :
d ∈ p.reverse.darts ↔ d.symm ∈ p.darts := by simp
#align simple_graph.walk.mem_darts_reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.mem_darts_reverse
theorem cons_map_snd_darts {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : (u :: p.darts.map (·.snd)) = p.support := by
induction p <;> simp! [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_map_snd_darts SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_map_snd_darts
theorem map_snd_darts {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.darts.map (·.snd) = p.support.tail := by
simpa using congr_arg List.tail (cons_map_snd_darts p)
#align simple_graph.walk.map_snd_darts SimpleGraph.Walk.map_snd_darts
theorem map_fst_darts_append {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) :
p.darts.map (·.fst) ++ [v] = p.support := by
induction p <;> simp! [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.map_fst_darts_append SimpleGraph.Walk.map_fst_darts_append
theorem map_fst_darts {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.darts.map (·.fst) = p.support.dropLast := by
simpa! using congr_arg List.dropLast (map_fst_darts_append p)
#align simple_graph.walk.map_fst_darts SimpleGraph.Walk.map_fst_darts
@[simp]
theorem edges_nil {u : V} : (nil : G.Walk u u).edges = [] := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_nil
@[simp]
theorem edges_cons {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h p).edges = s(u, v) :: p.edges := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_cons
@[simp]
theorem edges_concat {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) :
(p.concat h).edges = p.edges.concat s(v, w) := by simp [edges]
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_concat
@[simp]
theorem edges_copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).edges = p.edges := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_copy
@[simp]
theorem edges_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
(p.append p').edges = p.edges ++ p'.edges := by simp [edges]
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_append SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_append
@[simp]
theorem edges_reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.reverse.edges = p.edges.reverse := by
simp [edges, List.map_reverse]
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_reverse
@[simp]
theorem length_support {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.support.length = p.length + 1 := by
induction p <;> simp [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.length_support SimpleGraph.Walk.length_support
@[simp]
theorem length_darts {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.darts.length = p.length := by
induction p <;> simp [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.length_darts SimpleGraph.Walk.length_darts
@[simp]
theorem length_edges {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.edges.length = p.length := by simp [edges]
#align simple_graph.walk.length_edges SimpleGraph.Walk.length_edges
theorem dart_fst_mem_support_of_mem_darts {u v : V} :
∀ (p : G.Walk u v) {d : G.Dart}, d ∈ p.darts → d.fst ∈ p.support
| cons h p', d, hd => by
simp only [support_cons, darts_cons, List.mem_cons] at hd ⊢
rcases hd with (rfl | hd)
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr (dart_fst_mem_support_of_mem_darts _ hd)
#align simple_graph.walk.dart_fst_mem_support_of_mem_darts SimpleGraph.Walk.dart_fst_mem_support_of_mem_darts
theorem dart_snd_mem_support_of_mem_darts {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) {d : G.Dart}
(h : d ∈ p.darts) : d.snd ∈ p.support := by
simpa using p.reverse.dart_fst_mem_support_of_mem_darts (by simp [h] : d.symm ∈ p.reverse.darts)
#align simple_graph.walk.dart_snd_mem_support_of_mem_darts SimpleGraph.Walk.dart_snd_mem_support_of_mem_darts
theorem fst_mem_support_of_mem_edges {t u v w : V} (p : G.Walk v w) (he : s(t, u) ∈ p.edges) :
t ∈ p.support := by
obtain ⟨d, hd, he⟩ := List.mem_map.mp he
rw [dart_edge_eq_mk'_iff'] at he
rcases he with (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· exact dart_fst_mem_support_of_mem_darts _ hd
· exact dart_snd_mem_support_of_mem_darts _ hd
#align simple_graph.walk.fst_mem_support_of_mem_edges SimpleGraph.Walk.fst_mem_support_of_mem_edges
theorem snd_mem_support_of_mem_edges {t u v w : V} (p : G.Walk v w) (he : s(t, u) ∈ p.edges) :
u ∈ p.support := by
rw [Sym2.eq_swap] at he
exact p.fst_mem_support_of_mem_edges he
#align simple_graph.walk.snd_mem_support_of_mem_edges SimpleGraph.Walk.snd_mem_support_of_mem_edges
theorem darts_nodup_of_support_nodup {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (h : p.support.Nodup) :
p.darts.Nodup := by
induction p with
| nil => simp
| cons _ p' ih =>
simp only [darts_cons, support_cons, List.nodup_cons] at h ⊢
exact ⟨fun h' => h.1 (dart_fst_mem_support_of_mem_darts p' h'), ih h.2⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.darts_nodup_of_support_nodup SimpleGraph.Walk.darts_nodup_of_support_nodup
theorem edges_nodup_of_support_nodup {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (h : p.support.Nodup) :
p.edges.Nodup := by
induction p with
| nil => simp
| cons _ p' ih =>
simp only [edges_cons, support_cons, List.nodup_cons] at h ⊢
exact ⟨fun h' => h.1 (fst_mem_support_of_mem_edges p' h'), ih h.2⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_nodup_of_support_nodup SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_nodup_of_support_nodup
inductive Nil : {v w : V} → G.Walk v w → Prop
| nil {u : V} : Nil (nil : G.Walk u u)
variable {u v w : V}
@[simp] lemma nil_nil : (nil : G.Walk u u).Nil := Nil.nil
@[simp] lemma not_nil_cons {h : G.Adj u v} {p : G.Walk v w} : ¬ (cons h p).Nil := nofun
instance (p : G.Walk v w) : Decidable p.Nil :=
match p with
| nil => isTrue .nil
| cons _ _ => isFalse nofun
protected lemma Nil.eq {p : G.Walk v w} : p.Nil → v = w | .nil => rfl
lemma not_nil_of_ne {p : G.Walk v w} : v ≠ w → ¬ p.Nil := mt Nil.eq
lemma nil_iff_support_eq {p : G.Walk v w} : p.Nil ↔ p.support = [v] := by
cases p <;> simp
lemma nil_iff_length_eq {p : G.Walk v w} : p.Nil ↔ p.length = 0 := by
cases p <;> simp
lemma not_nil_iff {p : G.Walk v w} :
¬ p.Nil ↔ ∃ (u : V) (h : G.Adj v u) (q : G.Walk u w), p = cons h q := by
cases p <;> simp [*]
lemma nil_iff_eq_nil : ∀ {p : G.Walk v v}, p.Nil ↔ p = nil
| .nil | .cons _ _ => by simp
alias ⟨Nil.eq_nil, _⟩ := nil_iff_eq_nil
@[elab_as_elim]
def notNilRec {motive : {u w : V} → (p : G.Walk u w) → (h : ¬ p.Nil) → Sort*}
(cons : {u v w : V} → (h : G.Adj u v) → (q : G.Walk v w) → motive (cons h q) not_nil_cons)
(p : G.Walk u w) : (hp : ¬ p.Nil) → motive p hp :=
match p with
| nil => fun hp => absurd .nil hp
| .cons h q => fun _ => cons h q
def sndOfNotNil (p : G.Walk v w) (hp : ¬ p.Nil) : V :=
p.notNilRec (@fun _ u _ _ _ => u) hp
@[simp] lemma adj_sndOfNotNil {p : G.Walk v w} (hp : ¬ p.Nil) :
G.Adj v (p.sndOfNotNil hp) :=
p.notNilRec (fun h _ => h) hp
def tail (p : G.Walk u v) (hp : ¬ p.Nil) : G.Walk (p.sndOfNotNil hp) v :=
p.notNilRec (fun _ q => q) hp
@[simps]
def firstDart (p : G.Walk v w) (hp : ¬ p.Nil) : G.Dart where
fst := v
snd := p.sndOfNotNil hp
adj := p.adj_sndOfNotNil hp
lemma edge_firstDart (p : G.Walk v w) (hp : ¬ p.Nil) :
(p.firstDart hp).edge = s(v, p.sndOfNotNil hp) := rfl
variable {x y : V} -- TODO: rename to u, v, w instead?
@[simp] lemma cons_tail_eq (p : G.Walk x y) (hp : ¬ p.Nil) :
cons (p.adj_sndOfNotNil hp) (p.tail hp) = p :=
p.notNilRec (fun _ _ => rfl) hp
@[simp] lemma cons_support_tail (p : G.Walk x y) (hp : ¬p.Nil) :
x :: (p.tail hp).support = p.support := by
rw [← support_cons, cons_tail_eq]
@[simp] lemma length_tail_add_one {p : G.Walk x y} (hp : ¬ p.Nil) :
(p.tail hp).length + 1 = p.length := by
rw [← length_cons, cons_tail_eq]
@[simp] lemma nil_copy {x' y' : V} {p : G.Walk x y} (hx : x = x') (hy : y = y') :
(p.copy hx hy).Nil = p.Nil := by
subst_vars; rfl
@[simp] lemma support_tail (p : G.Walk v v) (hp) :
(p.tail hp).support = p.support.tail := by
rw [← cons_support_tail p hp, List.tail_cons]
@[mk_iff isTrail_def]
structure IsTrail {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : Prop where
edges_nodup : p.edges.Nodup
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail_def SimpleGraph.Walk.isTrail_def
structure IsPath {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) extends IsTrail p : Prop where
support_nodup : p.support.Nodup
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path SimpleGraph.Walk.IsPath
-- Porting note: used to use `extends to_trail : is_trail p` in structure
protected lemma IsPath.isTrail {p : Walk G u v}(h : IsPath p) : IsTrail p := h.toIsTrail
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path.to_trail SimpleGraph.Walk.IsPath.isTrail
@[mk_iff isCircuit_def]
structure IsCircuit {u : V} (p : G.Walk u u) extends IsTrail p : Prop where
ne_nil : p ≠ nil
#align simple_graph.walk.is_circuit SimpleGraph.Walk.IsCircuit
#align simple_graph.walk.is_circuit_def SimpleGraph.Walk.isCircuit_def
-- Porting note: used to use `extends to_trail : is_trail p` in structure
protected lemma IsCircuit.isTrail {p : Walk G u u} (h : IsCircuit p) : IsTrail p := h.toIsTrail
#align simple_graph.walk.is_circuit.to_trail SimpleGraph.Walk.IsCircuit.isTrail
structure IsCycle {u : V} (p : G.Walk u u) extends IsCircuit p : Prop where
support_nodup : p.support.tail.Nodup
#align simple_graph.walk.is_cycle SimpleGraph.Walk.IsCycle
-- Porting note: used to use `extends to_circuit : is_circuit p` in structure
protected lemma IsCycle.isCircuit {p : Walk G u u} (h : IsCycle p) : IsCircuit p := h.toIsCircuit
#align simple_graph.walk.is_cycle.to_circuit SimpleGraph.Walk.IsCycle.isCircuit
@[simp]
theorem isTrail_copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).IsTrail ↔ p.IsTrail := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.isTrail_copy
theorem IsPath.mk' {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (h : p.support.Nodup) : p.IsPath :=
⟨⟨edges_nodup_of_support_nodup h⟩, h⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path.mk' SimpleGraph.Walk.IsPath.mk'
theorem isPath_def {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.IsPath ↔ p.support.Nodup :=
⟨IsPath.support_nodup, IsPath.mk'⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path_def SimpleGraph.Walk.isPath_def
@[simp]
theorem isPath_copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).IsPath ↔ p.IsPath := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.isPath_copy
@[simp]
theorem isCircuit_copy {u u'} (p : G.Walk u u) (hu : u = u') :
(p.copy hu hu).IsCircuit ↔ p.IsCircuit := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.is_circuit_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.isCircuit_copy
lemma IsCircuit.not_nil {p : G.Walk v v} (hp : IsCircuit p) : ¬ p.Nil := (hp.ne_nil ·.eq_nil)
theorem isCycle_def {u : V} (p : G.Walk u u) :
p.IsCycle ↔ p.IsTrail ∧ p ≠ nil ∧ p.support.tail.Nodup :=
Iff.intro (fun h => ⟨h.1.1, h.1.2, h.2⟩) fun h => ⟨⟨h.1, h.2.1⟩, h.2.2⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.is_cycle_def SimpleGraph.Walk.isCycle_def
@[simp]
theorem isCycle_copy {u u'} (p : G.Walk u u) (hu : u = u') :
(p.copy hu hu).IsCycle ↔ p.IsCycle := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.is_cycle_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.isCycle_copy
lemma IsCycle.not_nil {p : G.Walk v v} (hp : IsCycle p) : ¬ p.Nil := (hp.ne_nil ·.eq_nil)
@[simp]
theorem IsTrail.nil {u : V} : (nil : G.Walk u u).IsTrail :=
⟨by simp [edges]⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail.nil SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail.nil
theorem IsTrail.of_cons {u v w : V} {h : G.Adj u v} {p : G.Walk v w} :
(cons h p).IsTrail → p.IsTrail := by simp [isTrail_def]
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail.of_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail.of_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_isTrail_iff {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h p).IsTrail ↔ p.IsTrail ∧ s(u, v) ∉ p.edges := by simp [isTrail_def, and_comm]
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_is_trail_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_isTrail_iff
theorem IsTrail.reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : p.IsTrail) : p.reverse.IsTrail := by
simpa [isTrail_def] using h
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail.reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail.reverse
@[simp]
theorem reverse_isTrail_iff {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.reverse.IsTrail ↔ p.IsTrail := by
constructor <;>
· intro h
convert h.reverse _
try rw [reverse_reverse]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_is_trail_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_isTrail_iff
theorem IsTrail.of_append_left {u v w : V} {p : G.Walk u v} {q : G.Walk v w}
(h : (p.append q).IsTrail) : p.IsTrail := by
rw [isTrail_def, edges_append, List.nodup_append] at h
exact ⟨h.1⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail.of_append_left SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail.of_append_left
theorem IsTrail.of_append_right {u v w : V} {p : G.Walk u v} {q : G.Walk v w}
(h : (p.append q).IsTrail) : q.IsTrail := by
rw [isTrail_def, edges_append, List.nodup_append] at h
exact ⟨h.2.1⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail.of_append_right SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail.of_append_right
theorem IsTrail.count_edges_le_one [DecidableEq V] {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (h : p.IsTrail)
(e : Sym2 V) : p.edges.count e ≤ 1 :=
List.nodup_iff_count_le_one.mp h.edges_nodup e
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail.count_edges_le_one SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail.count_edges_le_one
theorem IsTrail.count_edges_eq_one [DecidableEq V] {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (h : p.IsTrail)
{e : Sym2 V} (he : e ∈ p.edges) : p.edges.count e = 1 :=
List.count_eq_one_of_mem h.edges_nodup he
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail.count_edges_eq_one SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail.count_edges_eq_one
theorem IsPath.nil {u : V} : (nil : G.Walk u u).IsPath := by constructor <;> simp
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path.nil SimpleGraph.Walk.IsPath.nil
theorem IsPath.of_cons {u v w : V} {h : G.Adj u v} {p : G.Walk v w} :
(cons h p).IsPath → p.IsPath := by simp [isPath_def]
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path.of_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.IsPath.of_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_isPath_iff {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h p).IsPath ↔ p.IsPath ∧ u ∉ p.support := by
constructor <;> simp (config := { contextual := true }) [isPath_def]
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_is_path_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_isPath_iff
protected lemma IsPath.cons {p : Walk G v w} (hp : p.IsPath) (hu : u ∉ p.support) {h : G.Adj u v} :
(cons h p).IsPath :=
(cons_isPath_iff _ _).2 ⟨hp, hu⟩
@[simp]
theorem isPath_iff_eq_nil {u : V} (p : G.Walk u u) : p.IsPath ↔ p = nil := by
cases p <;> simp [IsPath.nil]
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path_iff_eq_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.isPath_iff_eq_nil
theorem IsPath.reverse {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (h : p.IsPath) : p.reverse.IsPath := by
simpa [isPath_def] using h
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path.reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.IsPath.reverse
@[simp]
theorem isPath_reverse_iff {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.reverse.IsPath ↔ p.IsPath := by
constructor <;> intro h <;> convert h.reverse; simp
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path_reverse_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.isPath_reverse_iff
theorem IsPath.of_append_left {u v w : V} {p : G.Walk u v} {q : G.Walk v w} :
(p.append q).IsPath → p.IsPath := by
simp only [isPath_def, support_append]
exact List.Nodup.of_append_left
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path.of_append_left SimpleGraph.Walk.IsPath.of_append_left
theorem IsPath.of_append_right {u v w : V} {p : G.Walk u v} {q : G.Walk v w}
(h : (p.append q).IsPath) : q.IsPath := by
rw [← isPath_reverse_iff] at h ⊢
rw [reverse_append] at h
apply h.of_append_left
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path.of_append_right SimpleGraph.Walk.IsPath.of_append_right
@[simp]
theorem IsCycle.not_of_nil {u : V} : ¬(nil : G.Walk u u).IsCycle := fun h => h.ne_nil rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.is_cycle.not_of_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.IsCycle.not_of_nil
lemma IsCycle.ne_bot : ∀ {p : G.Walk u u}, p.IsCycle → G ≠ ⊥
| nil, hp => by cases hp.ne_nil rfl
| cons h _, hp => by rintro rfl; exact h
lemma IsCycle.three_le_length {v : V} {p : G.Walk v v} (hp : p.IsCycle) : 3 ≤ p.length := by
have ⟨⟨hp, hp'⟩, _⟩ := hp
match p with
| .nil => simp at hp'
| .cons h .nil => simp at h
| .cons _ (.cons _ .nil) => simp at hp
| .cons _ (.cons _ (.cons _ _)) => simp_rw [SimpleGraph.Walk.length_cons]; omega
theorem cons_isCycle_iff {u v : V} (p : G.Walk v u) (h : G.Adj u v) :
(Walk.cons h p).IsCycle ↔ p.IsPath ∧ ¬s(u, v) ∈ p.edges := by
simp only [Walk.isCycle_def, Walk.isPath_def, Walk.isTrail_def, edges_cons, List.nodup_cons,
support_cons, List.tail_cons]
have : p.support.Nodup → p.edges.Nodup := edges_nodup_of_support_nodup
tauto
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_is_cycle_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_isCycle_iff
lemma IsPath.tail {p : G.Walk u v} (hp : p.IsPath) (hp' : ¬ p.Nil) : (p.tail hp').IsPath := by
rw [Walk.isPath_def] at hp ⊢
rw [← cons_support_tail _ hp', List.nodup_cons] at hp
exact hp.2
instance [DecidableEq V] {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : Decidable p.IsPath := by
rw [isPath_def]
infer_instance
theorem IsPath.length_lt [Fintype V] {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (hp : p.IsPath) :
p.length < Fintype.card V := by
rw [Nat.lt_iff_add_one_le, ← length_support]
exact hp.support_nodup.length_le_card
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path.length_lt SimpleGraph.Walk.IsPath.length_lt
section WalkDecomp
variable [DecidableEq V]
def takeUntil {v w : V} : ∀ (p : G.Walk v w) (u : V), u ∈ p.support → G.Walk v u
| nil, u, h => by rw [mem_support_nil_iff.mp h]
| cons r p, u, h =>
if hx : v = u then
by subst u; exact Walk.nil
else
cons r (takeUntil p u <| by
cases h
· exact (hx rfl).elim
· assumption)
#align simple_graph.walk.take_until SimpleGraph.Walk.takeUntil
def dropUntil {v w : V} : ∀ (p : G.Walk v w) (u : V), u ∈ p.support → G.Walk u w
| nil, u, h => by rw [mem_support_nil_iff.mp h]
| cons r p, u, h =>
if hx : v = u then by
subst u
exact cons r p
else dropUntil p u <| by
cases h
· exact (hx rfl).elim
· assumption
#align simple_graph.walk.drop_until SimpleGraph.Walk.dropUntil
@[simp]
theorem take_spec {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk v w) (h : u ∈ p.support) :
(p.takeUntil u h).append (p.dropUntil u h) = p := by
induction p
· rw [mem_support_nil_iff] at h
subst u
rfl
· cases h
· simp!
· simp! only
split_ifs with h' <;> subst_vars <;> simp [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.take_spec SimpleGraph.Walk.take_spec
theorem mem_support_iff_exists_append {V : Type u} {G : SimpleGraph V} {u v w : V}
{p : G.Walk u v} : w ∈ p.support ↔ ∃ (q : G.Walk u w) (r : G.Walk w v), p = q.append r := by
classical
constructor
· exact fun h => ⟨_, _, (p.take_spec h).symm⟩
· rintro ⟨q, r, rfl⟩
simp only [mem_support_append_iff, end_mem_support, start_mem_support, or_self_iff]
#align simple_graph.walk.mem_support_iff_exists_append SimpleGraph.Walk.mem_support_iff_exists_append
@[simp]
theorem count_support_takeUntil_eq_one {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk v w) (h : u ∈ p.support) :
(p.takeUntil u h).support.count u = 1 := by
induction p
· rw [mem_support_nil_iff] at h
subst u
simp!
· cases h
· simp!
· simp! only
split_ifs with h' <;> rw [eq_comm] at h' <;> subst_vars <;> simp! [*, List.count_cons]
#align simple_graph.walk.count_support_take_until_eq_one SimpleGraph.Walk.count_support_takeUntil_eq_one
theorem count_edges_takeUntil_le_one {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk v w) (h : u ∈ p.support) (x : V) :
(p.takeUntil u h).edges.count s(u, x) ≤ 1 := by
induction' p with u' u' v' w' ha p' ih
· rw [mem_support_nil_iff] at h
subst u
simp!
· cases h
· simp!
· simp! only
split_ifs with h'
· subst h'
simp
· rw [edges_cons, List.count_cons]
split_ifs with h''
· rw [Sym2.eq_iff] at h''
obtain ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ := h''
· exact (h' rfl).elim
· cases p' <;> simp!
· apply ih
#align simple_graph.walk.count_edges_take_until_le_one SimpleGraph.Walk.count_edges_takeUntil_le_one
@[simp]
theorem takeUntil_copy {u v w v' w'} (p : G.Walk v w) (hv : v = v') (hw : w = w')
(h : u ∈ (p.copy hv hw).support) :
(p.copy hv hw).takeUntil u h = (p.takeUntil u (by subst_vars; exact h)).copy hv rfl := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.take_until_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.takeUntil_copy
@[simp]
theorem dropUntil_copy {u v w v' w'} (p : G.Walk v w) (hv : v = v') (hw : w = w')
(h : u ∈ (p.copy hv hw).support) :
(p.copy hv hw).dropUntil u h = (p.dropUntil u (by subst_vars; exact h)).copy rfl hw := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.drop_until_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.dropUntil_copy
theorem support_takeUntil_subset {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk v w) (h : u ∈ p.support) :
(p.takeUntil u h).support ⊆ p.support := fun x hx => by
rw [← take_spec p h, mem_support_append_iff]
exact Or.inl hx
#align simple_graph.walk.support_take_until_subset SimpleGraph.Walk.support_takeUntil_subset
theorem support_dropUntil_subset {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk v w) (h : u ∈ p.support) :
(p.dropUntil u h).support ⊆ p.support := fun x hx => by
rw [← take_spec p h, mem_support_append_iff]
exact Or.inr hx
#align simple_graph.walk.support_drop_until_subset SimpleGraph.Walk.support_dropUntil_subset
theorem darts_takeUntil_subset {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk v w) (h : u ∈ p.support) :
(p.takeUntil u h).darts ⊆ p.darts := fun x hx => by
rw [← take_spec p h, darts_append, List.mem_append]
exact Or.inl hx
#align simple_graph.walk.darts_take_until_subset SimpleGraph.Walk.darts_takeUntil_subset
theorem darts_dropUntil_subset {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk v w) (h : u ∈ p.support) :
(p.dropUntil u h).darts ⊆ p.darts := fun x hx => by
rw [← take_spec p h, darts_append, List.mem_append]
exact Or.inr hx
#align simple_graph.walk.darts_drop_until_subset SimpleGraph.Walk.darts_dropUntil_subset
theorem edges_takeUntil_subset {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk v w) (h : u ∈ p.support) :
(p.takeUntil u h).edges ⊆ p.edges :=
List.map_subset _ (p.darts_takeUntil_subset h)
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_take_until_subset SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_takeUntil_subset
theorem edges_dropUntil_subset {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk v w) (h : u ∈ p.support) :
(p.dropUntil u h).edges ⊆ p.edges :=
List.map_subset _ (p.darts_dropUntil_subset h)
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_drop_until_subset SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_dropUntil_subset
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Connectivity.lean | 1,299 | 1,303 | theorem length_takeUntil_le {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk v w) (h : u ∈ p.support) :
(p.takeUntil u h).length ≤ p.length := by |
have := congr_arg Walk.length (p.take_spec h)
rw [length_append] at this
exact Nat.le.intro this
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.WeakDual
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.BoundedContinuousFunction
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.HasOuterApproxClosed
#align_import measure_theory.measure.finite_measure from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
noncomputable section
open MeasureTheory
open Set
open Filter
open BoundedContinuousFunction
open scoped Topology ENNReal NNReal BoundedContinuousFunction
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace FiniteMeasure
section FiniteMeasure
variable {Ω : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω]
def _root_.MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure (Ω : Type*) [MeasurableSpace Ω] : Type _ :=
{ μ : Measure Ω // IsFiniteMeasure μ }
#align measure_theory.finite_measure MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure
-- Porting note: as with other subtype synonyms (e.g., `ℝ≥0`, we need a new function for the
-- coercion instead of relying on `Subtype.val`.
@[coe]
def toMeasure : FiniteMeasure Ω → Measure Ω := Subtype.val
instance instCoe : Coe (FiniteMeasure Ω) (MeasureTheory.Measure Ω) where
coe := toMeasure
instance isFiniteMeasure (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : IsFiniteMeasure (μ : Measure Ω) :=
μ.prop
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.is_finite_measure MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.isFiniteMeasure
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_toMeasure (ν : FiniteMeasure Ω) : ν.val = (ν : Measure Ω) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.val_eq_to_measure MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.val_eq_toMeasure
theorem toMeasure_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : FiniteMeasure Ω → Measure Ω) :=
Subtype.coe_injective
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.coe_injective MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.toMeasure_injective
instance instFunLike : FunLike (FiniteMeasure Ω) (Set Ω) ℝ≥0 where
coe μ s := ((μ : Measure Ω) s).toNNReal
coe_injective' μ ν h := toMeasure_injective $ Measure.ext fun s _ ↦ by
simpa [ENNReal.toNNReal_eq_toNNReal_iff, measure_ne_top] using congr_fun h s
lemma coeFn_def (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : μ = fun s ↦ ((μ : Measure Ω) s).toNNReal := rfl
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.coe_fn_eq_to_nnreal_coe_fn_to_measure MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.coeFn_def
lemma coeFn_mk (μ : Measure Ω) (hμ) :
DFunLike.coe (F := FiniteMeasure Ω) ⟨μ, hμ⟩ = fun s ↦ (μ s).toNNReal := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma mk_apply (μ : Measure Ω) (hμ) (s : Set Ω) :
DFunLike.coe (F := FiniteMeasure Ω) ⟨μ, hμ⟩ s = (μ s).toNNReal := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure (ν : FiniteMeasure Ω) (s : Set Ω) :
(ν s : ℝ≥0∞) = (ν : Measure Ω) s :=
ENNReal.coe_toNNReal (measure_lt_top (↑ν) s).ne
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.ennreal_coe_fn_eq_coe_fn_to_measure MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure
theorem apply_mono (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) {s₁ s₂ : Set Ω} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : μ s₁ ≤ μ s₂ := by
change ((μ : Measure Ω) s₁).toNNReal ≤ ((μ : Measure Ω) s₂).toNNReal
have key : (μ : Measure Ω) s₁ ≤ (μ : Measure Ω) s₂ := (μ : Measure Ω).mono h
apply (ENNReal.toNNReal_le_toNNReal (measure_ne_top _ s₁) (measure_ne_top _ s₂)).mpr key
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.apply_mono MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.apply_mono
def mass (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : ℝ≥0 :=
μ univ
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.mass MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.mass
@[simp] theorem apply_le_mass (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (s : Set Ω) : μ s ≤ μ.mass := by
simpa using apply_mono μ (subset_univ s)
@[simp]
theorem ennreal_mass {μ : FiniteMeasure Ω} : (μ.mass : ℝ≥0∞) = (μ : Measure Ω) univ :=
ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure μ Set.univ
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.ennreal_mass MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.ennreal_mass
instance instZero : Zero (FiniteMeasure Ω) where zero := ⟨0, MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasureZero⟩
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.has_zero MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.instZero
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coeFn_zero : ⇑(0 : FiniteMeasure Ω) = 0 := rfl
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.coe_fn_zero MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.coeFn_zero
@[simp]
theorem zero_mass : (0 : FiniteMeasure Ω).mass = 0 :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.zero.mass MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.zero_mass
@[simp]
theorem mass_zero_iff (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : μ.mass = 0 ↔ μ = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun μ_mass => ?_, fun hμ => by simp only [hμ, zero_mass]⟩
apply toMeasure_injective
apply Measure.measure_univ_eq_zero.mp
rwa [← ennreal_mass, ENNReal.coe_eq_zero]
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.mass_zero_iff MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.mass_zero_iff
theorem mass_nonzero_iff (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : μ.mass ≠ 0 ↔ μ ≠ 0 := by
rw [not_iff_not]
exact FiniteMeasure.mass_zero_iff μ
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.mass_nonzero_iff MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.mass_nonzero_iff
@[ext]
theorem eq_of_forall_toMeasure_apply_eq (μ ν : FiniteMeasure Ω)
(h : ∀ s : Set Ω, MeasurableSet s → (μ : Measure Ω) s = (ν : Measure Ω) s) : μ = ν := by
apply Subtype.ext
ext1 s s_mble
exact h s s_mble
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.eq_of_forall_measure_apply_eq MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.eq_of_forall_toMeasure_apply_eq
theorem eq_of_forall_apply_eq (μ ν : FiniteMeasure Ω)
(h : ∀ s : Set Ω, MeasurableSet s → μ s = ν s) : μ = ν := by
ext1 s s_mble
simpa [ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure] using congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) (h s s_mble)
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.eq_of_forall_apply_eq MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.eq_of_forall_apply_eq
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (FiniteMeasure Ω) :=
⟨0⟩
instance instAdd : Add (FiniteMeasure Ω) where add μ ν := ⟨μ + ν, MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasureAdd⟩
variable {R : Type*} [SMul R ℝ≥0] [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0∞]
[IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
instance instSMul : SMul R (FiniteMeasure Ω) where
smul (c : R) μ := ⟨c • (μ : Measure Ω), MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasureSMulOfNNRealTower⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem toMeasure_zero : ((↑) : FiniteMeasure Ω → Measure Ω) 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.coe_zero MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.toMeasure_zero
-- Porting note: with `simp` here the `coeFn` lemmas below fall prey to `simpNF`: the LHS simplifies
@[norm_cast]
theorem toMeasure_add (μ ν : FiniteMeasure Ω) : ↑(μ + ν) = (↑μ + ↑ν : Measure Ω) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.coe_add MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.toMeasure_add
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem toMeasure_smul (c : R) (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : ↑(c • μ) = c • (μ : Measure Ω) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.coe_smul MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.toMeasure_smul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coeFn_add (μ ν : FiniteMeasure Ω) : (⇑(μ + ν) : Set Ω → ℝ≥0) = (⇑μ + ⇑ν : Set Ω → ℝ≥0) := by
funext
simp only [Pi.add_apply, ← ENNReal.coe_inj, ne_eq, ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure,
ENNReal.coe_add]
norm_cast
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.coe_fn_add MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.coeFn_add
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coeFn_smul [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0] (c : R) (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) :
(⇑(c • μ) : Set Ω → ℝ≥0) = c • (⇑μ : Set Ω → ℝ≥0) := by
funext; simp [← ENNReal.coe_inj, ENNReal.coe_smul]
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.coe_fn_smul MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.coeFn_smul
instance instAddCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (FiniteMeasure Ω) :=
toMeasure_injective.addCommMonoid (↑) toMeasure_zero toMeasure_add fun _ _ => toMeasure_smul _ _
@[simps]
def toMeasureAddMonoidHom : FiniteMeasure Ω →+ Measure Ω where
toFun := (↑)
map_zero' := toMeasure_zero
map_add' := toMeasure_add
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.coe_add_monoid_hom MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.toMeasureAddMonoidHom
instance {Ω : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω] : Module ℝ≥0 (FiniteMeasure Ω) :=
Function.Injective.module _ toMeasureAddMonoidHom toMeasure_injective toMeasure_smul
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0] (c : R) (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (s : Set Ω) :
(c • μ) s = c • μ s := by
rw [coeFn_smul, Pi.smul_apply]
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.coe_fn_smul_apply MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.smul_apply
def restrict (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (A : Set Ω) : FiniteMeasure Ω where
val := (μ : Measure Ω).restrict A
property := MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasureRestrict (μ : Measure Ω) A
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.restrict MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.restrict
theorem restrict_measure_eq (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (A : Set Ω) :
(μ.restrict A : Measure Ω) = (μ : Measure Ω).restrict A :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.restrict_measure_eq MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.restrict_measure_eq
theorem restrict_apply_measure (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (A : Set Ω) {s : Set Ω}
(s_mble : MeasurableSet s) : (μ.restrict A : Measure Ω) s = (μ : Measure Ω) (s ∩ A) :=
Measure.restrict_apply s_mble
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.restrict_apply_measure MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.restrict_apply_measure
theorem restrict_apply (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (A : Set Ω) {s : Set Ω} (s_mble : MeasurableSet s) :
(μ.restrict A) s = μ (s ∩ A) := by
apply congr_arg ENNReal.toNNReal
exact Measure.restrict_apply s_mble
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.restrict_apply MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.restrict_apply
theorem restrict_mass (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (A : Set Ω) : (μ.restrict A).mass = μ A := by
simp only [mass, restrict_apply μ A MeasurableSet.univ, univ_inter]
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.restrict_mass MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.restrict_mass
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/FiniteMeasure.lean | 313 | 314 | theorem restrict_eq_zero_iff (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (A : Set Ω) : μ.restrict A = 0 ↔ μ A = 0 := by |
rw [← mass_zero_iff, restrict_mass]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Function
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Says
#align_import logic.equiv.set from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"aba57d4d3dae35460225919dcd82fe91355162f9"
open Function Set
universe u v w z
variable {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {γ : Sort w}
namespace Equiv
@[simp]
theorem range_eq_univ {α : Type*} {β : Type*} (e : α ≃ β) : range e = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall e.surjective
#align equiv.range_eq_univ Equiv.range_eq_univ
protected theorem image_eq_preimage {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s : Set α) : e '' s = e.symm ⁻¹' s :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_image_iff_of_inverse e.left_inv e.right_inv
#align equiv.image_eq_preimage Equiv.image_eq_preimage
@[simp 1001]
theorem _root_.Set.mem_image_equiv {α β} {S : Set α} {f : α ≃ β} {x : β} :
x ∈ f '' S ↔ f.symm x ∈ S :=
Set.ext_iff.mp (f.image_eq_preimage S) x
#align set.mem_image_equiv Set.mem_image_equiv
theorem _root_.Set.image_equiv_eq_preimage_symm {α β} (S : Set α) (f : α ≃ β) :
f '' S = f.symm ⁻¹' S :=
f.image_eq_preimage S
#align set.image_equiv_eq_preimage_symm Set.image_equiv_eq_preimage_symm
theorem _root_.Set.preimage_equiv_eq_image_symm {α β} (S : Set α) (f : β ≃ α) :
f ⁻¹' S = f.symm '' S :=
(f.symm.image_eq_preimage S).symm
#align set.preimage_equiv_eq_image_symm Set.preimage_equiv_eq_image_symm
-- Porting note: increased priority so this fires before `image_subset_iff`
@[simp high]
protected theorem symm_image_subset {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
e.symm '' t ⊆ s ↔ t ⊆ e '' s := by rw [image_subset_iff, e.image_eq_preimage]
#align equiv.subset_image Equiv.symm_image_subset
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-19")] alias subset_image := Equiv.symm_image_subset
-- Porting note: increased priority so this fires before `image_subset_iff`
@[simp high]
protected theorem subset_symm_image {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
s ⊆ e.symm '' t ↔ e '' s ⊆ t :=
calc
s ⊆ e.symm '' t ↔ e.symm.symm '' s ⊆ t := by rw [e.symm.symm_image_subset]
_ ↔ e '' s ⊆ t := by rw [e.symm_symm]
#align equiv.subset_image' Equiv.subset_symm_image
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-19")] alias subset_image' := Equiv.subset_symm_image
@[simp]
theorem symm_image_image {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s : Set α) : e.symm '' (e '' s) = s :=
e.leftInverse_symm.image_image s
#align equiv.symm_image_image Equiv.symm_image_image
theorem eq_image_iff_symm_image_eq {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
t = e '' s ↔ e.symm '' t = s :=
(e.symm.injective.image_injective.eq_iff' (e.symm_image_image s)).symm
#align equiv.eq_image_iff_symm_image_eq Equiv.eq_image_iff_symm_image_eq
@[simp]
theorem image_symm_image {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s : Set β) : e '' (e.symm '' s) = s :=
e.symm.symm_image_image s
#align equiv.image_symm_image Equiv.image_symm_image
@[simp]
theorem image_preimage {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s : Set β) : e '' (e ⁻¹' s) = s :=
e.surjective.image_preimage s
#align equiv.image_preimage Equiv.image_preimage
@[simp]
theorem preimage_image {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s : Set α) : e ⁻¹' (e '' s) = s :=
e.injective.preimage_image s
#align equiv.preimage_image Equiv.preimage_image
protected theorem image_compl {α β} (f : Equiv α β) (s : Set α) : f '' sᶜ = (f '' s)ᶜ :=
image_compl_eq f.bijective
#align equiv.image_compl Equiv.image_compl
@[simp]
theorem symm_preimage_preimage {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s : Set β) : e.symm ⁻¹' (e ⁻¹' s) = s :=
e.rightInverse_symm.preimage_preimage s
#align equiv.symm_preimage_preimage Equiv.symm_preimage_preimage
@[simp]
theorem preimage_symm_preimage {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s : Set α) : e ⁻¹' (e.symm ⁻¹' s) = s :=
e.leftInverse_symm.preimage_preimage s
#align equiv.preimage_symm_preimage Equiv.preimage_symm_preimage
theorem preimage_subset {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s t : Set β) : e ⁻¹' s ⊆ e ⁻¹' t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
e.surjective.preimage_subset_preimage_iff
#align equiv.preimage_subset Equiv.preimage_subset
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp` attribute. `simp` can prove it.
theorem image_subset {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s t : Set α) : e '' s ⊆ e '' t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
image_subset_image_iff e.injective
#align equiv.image_subset Equiv.image_subset
@[simp]
theorem image_eq_iff_eq {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s t : Set α) : e '' s = e '' t ↔ s = t :=
image_eq_image e.injective
#align equiv.image_eq_iff_eq Equiv.image_eq_iff_eq
theorem preimage_eq_iff_eq_image {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s t) : e ⁻¹' s = t ↔ s = e '' t :=
Set.preimage_eq_iff_eq_image e.bijective
#align equiv.preimage_eq_iff_eq_image Equiv.preimage_eq_iff_eq_image
theorem eq_preimage_iff_image_eq {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s t) : s = e ⁻¹' t ↔ e '' s = t :=
Set.eq_preimage_iff_image_eq e.bijective
#align equiv.eq_preimage_iff_image_eq Equiv.eq_preimage_iff_image_eq
lemma setOf_apply_symm_eq_image_setOf {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (p : α → Prop) :
{b | p (e.symm b)} = e '' {a | p a} := by
rw [Equiv.image_eq_preimage, preimage_setOf_eq]
@[simp]
theorem prod_assoc_preimage {α β γ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {u : Set γ} :
Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t ×ˢ u = (s ×ˢ t) ×ˢ u := by
ext
simp [and_assoc]
#align equiv.prod_assoc_preimage Equiv.prod_assoc_preimage
@[simp]
theorem prod_assoc_symm_preimage {α β γ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {u : Set γ} :
(Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ).symm ⁻¹' (s ×ˢ t) ×ˢ u = s ×ˢ t ×ˢ u := by
ext
simp [and_assoc]
#align equiv.prod_assoc_symm_preimage Equiv.prod_assoc_symm_preimage
-- `@[simp]` doesn't like these lemmas, as it uses `Set.image_congr'` to turn `Equiv.prodAssoc`
-- into a lambda expression and then unfold it.
theorem prod_assoc_image {α β γ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {u : Set γ} :
Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ '' (s ×ˢ t) ×ˢ u = s ×ˢ t ×ˢ u := by
simpa only [Equiv.image_eq_preimage] using prod_assoc_symm_preimage
#align equiv.prod_assoc_image Equiv.prod_assoc_image
theorem prod_assoc_symm_image {α β γ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {u : Set γ} :
(Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ).symm '' s ×ˢ t ×ˢ u = (s ×ˢ t) ×ˢ u := by
simpa only [Equiv.image_eq_preimage] using prod_assoc_preimage
#align equiv.prod_assoc_symm_image Equiv.prod_assoc_symm_image
def setProdEquivSigma {α β : Type*} (s : Set (α × β)) :
s ≃ Σx : α, { y : β | (x, y) ∈ s } where
toFun x := ⟨x.1.1, x.1.2, by simp⟩
invFun x := ⟨(x.1, x.2.1), x.2.2⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨⟨x, y⟩, h⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨x, y, h⟩ => rfl
#align equiv.set_prod_equiv_sigma Equiv.setProdEquivSigma
@[simps! apply]
def setCongr {α : Type*} {s t : Set α} (h : s = t) : s ≃ t :=
subtypeEquivProp h
#align equiv.set_congr Equiv.setCongr
#align equiv.set_congr_apply Equiv.setCongr_apply
-- We could construct this using `Equiv.Set.image e s e.injective`,
-- but this definition provides an explicit inverse.
@[simps]
def image {α β : Type*} (e : α ≃ β) (s : Set α) :
s ≃ e '' s where
toFun x := ⟨e x.1, by simp⟩
invFun y :=
⟨e.symm y.1, by
rcases y with ⟨-, ⟨a, ⟨m, rfl⟩⟩⟩
simpa using m⟩
left_inv x := by simp
right_inv y := by simp
#align equiv.image Equiv.image
#align equiv.image_symm_apply_coe Equiv.image_symm_apply_coe
#align equiv.image_apply_coe Equiv.image_apply_coe
@[simps]
def ofLeftInverse {α β : Sort _} (f : α → β) (f_inv : Nonempty α → β → α)
(hf : ∀ h : Nonempty α, LeftInverse (f_inv h) f) :
α ≃ range f where
toFun a := ⟨f a, a, rfl⟩
invFun b := f_inv (nonempty_of_exists b.2) b
left_inv a := hf ⟨a⟩ a
right_inv := fun ⟨b, a, ha⟩ =>
Subtype.eq <| show f (f_inv ⟨a⟩ b) = b from Eq.trans (congr_arg f <| ha ▸ hf _ a) ha
#align equiv.of_left_inverse Equiv.ofLeftInverse
#align equiv.of_left_inverse_apply_coe Equiv.ofLeftInverse_apply_coe
#align equiv.of_left_inverse_symm_apply Equiv.ofLeftInverse_symm_apply
abbrev ofLeftInverse' {α β : Sort _} (f : α → β) (f_inv : β → α) (hf : LeftInverse f_inv f) :
α ≃ range f :=
ofLeftInverse f (fun _ => f_inv) fun _ => hf
#align equiv.of_left_inverse' Equiv.ofLeftInverse'
@[simps! apply]
noncomputable def ofInjective {α β} (f : α → β) (hf : Injective f) : α ≃ range f :=
Equiv.ofLeftInverse f (fun _ => Function.invFun f) fun _ => Function.leftInverse_invFun hf
#align equiv.of_injective Equiv.ofInjective
#align equiv.of_injective_apply Equiv.ofInjective_apply
theorem apply_ofInjective_symm {α β} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (b : range f) :
f ((ofInjective f hf).symm b) = b :=
Subtype.ext_iff.1 <| (ofInjective f hf).apply_symm_apply b
#align equiv.apply_of_injective_symm Equiv.apply_ofInjective_symm
@[simp]
theorem ofInjective_symm_apply {α β} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (a : α) :
(ofInjective f hf).symm ⟨f a, ⟨a, rfl⟩⟩ = a := by
apply (ofInjective f hf).injective
simp [apply_ofInjective_symm hf]
#align equiv.of_injective_symm_apply Equiv.ofInjective_symm_apply
theorem coe_ofInjective_symm {α β} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
((ofInjective f hf).symm : range f → α) = rangeSplitting f := by
ext ⟨y, x, rfl⟩
apply hf
simp [apply_rangeSplitting f]
#align equiv.coe_of_injective_symm Equiv.coe_ofInjective_symm
@[simp]
theorem self_comp_ofInjective_symm {α β} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
f ∘ (ofInjective f hf).symm = Subtype.val :=
funext fun x => apply_ofInjective_symm hf x
#align equiv.self_comp_of_injective_symm Equiv.self_comp_ofInjective_symm
theorem ofLeftInverse_eq_ofInjective {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) (f_inv : Nonempty α → β → α)
(hf : ∀ h : Nonempty α, LeftInverse (f_inv h) f) :
ofLeftInverse f f_inv hf =
ofInjective f ((isEmpty_or_nonempty α).elim (fun h _ _ _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _)
(fun h => (hf h).injective)) := by
ext
simp
#align equiv.of_left_inverse_eq_of_injective Equiv.ofLeftInverse_eq_ofInjective
| Mathlib/Logic/Equiv/Set.lean | 651 | 654 | theorem ofLeftInverse'_eq_ofInjective {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) (f_inv : β → α)
(hf : LeftInverse f_inv f) : ofLeftInverse' f f_inv hf = ofInjective f hf.injective := by |
ext
simp
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Units.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.Defs
#align_import data.rat.cast from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"acebd8d49928f6ed8920e502a6c90674e75bd441"
variable {F ι α β : Type*}
namespace Rat
open Rat
section WithDivRing
variable [DivisionRing α]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_inj [CharZero α] : ∀ {m n : ℚ}, (m : α) = n ↔ m = n
| ⟨n₁, d₁, d₁0, c₁⟩, ⟨n₂, d₂, d₂0, c₂⟩ => by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, congr_arg _⟩
have d₁a : (d₁ : α) ≠ 0 := Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 d₁0
have d₂a : (d₂ : α) ≠ 0 := Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 d₂0
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, mk'_eq_divInt] at h ⊢
rw [cast_divInt_of_ne_zero, cast_divInt_of_ne_zero] at h <;> simp [d₁0, d₂0] at h ⊢
rwa [eq_div_iff_mul_eq d₂a, division_def, mul_assoc, (d₁.cast_commute (d₂ : α)).inv_left₀.eq, ←
mul_assoc, ← division_def, eq_comm, eq_div_iff_mul_eq d₁a, eq_comm, ← Int.cast_natCast d₁, ←
Int.cast_mul, ← Int.cast_natCast d₂, ← Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_inj, ← mkRat_eq_iff d₁0 d₂0]
at h
#align rat.cast_inj Rat.cast_inj
theorem cast_injective [CharZero α] : Function.Injective ((↑) : ℚ → α)
| _, _ => cast_inj.1
#align rat.cast_injective Rat.cast_injective
@[simp]
theorem cast_eq_zero [CharZero α] {n : ℚ} : (n : α) = 0 ↔ n = 0 := by rw [← cast_zero, cast_inj]
#align rat.cast_eq_zero Rat.cast_eq_zero
theorem cast_ne_zero [CharZero α] {n : ℚ} : (n : α) ≠ 0 ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
not_congr cast_eq_zero
#align rat.cast_ne_zero Rat.cast_ne_zero
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add [CharZero α] (m n) : ((m + n : ℚ) : α) = m + n :=
cast_add_of_ne_zero (Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 <| ne_of_gt m.pos) (Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 <| ne_of_gt n.pos)
#align rat.cast_add Rat.cast_add
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_sub [CharZero α] (m n) : ((m - n : ℚ) : α) = m - n :=
cast_sub_of_ne_zero (Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 <| ne_of_gt m.pos) (Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 <| ne_of_gt n.pos)
#align rat.cast_sub Rat.cast_sub
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_mul [CharZero α] (m n) : ((m * n : ℚ) : α) = m * n :=
cast_mul_of_ne_zero (Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 <| ne_of_gt m.pos) (Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 <| ne_of_gt n.pos)
#align rat.cast_mul Rat.cast_mul
section
set_option linter.deprecated false
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit0 [CharZero α] (n : ℚ) : ((bit0 n : ℚ) : α) = (bit0 n : α) :=
cast_add _ _
#align rat.cast_bit0 Rat.cast_bit0
@[simp, norm_cast]
| Mathlib/Data/Rat/Cast/CharZero.lean | 78 | 79 | theorem cast_bit1 [CharZero α] (n : ℚ) : ((bit1 n : ℚ) : α) = (bit1 n : α) := by |
rw [bit1, cast_add, cast_one, cast_bit0]; rfl
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Expand
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Laurent
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Charpoly.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Reindex
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Nilpotent
#align_import linear_algebra.matrix.charpoly.coeff from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9745b093210e9dac443af24da9dba0f9e2b6c912"
noncomputable section
-- porting note: whenever there was `∏ i : n, X - C (M i i)`, I replaced it with
-- `∏ i : n, (X - C (M i i))`, since otherwise Lean would parse as `(∏ i : n, X) - C (M i i)`
universe u v w z
open Finset Matrix Polynomial
variable {R : Type u} [CommRing R]
variable {n G : Type v} [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n]
variable {α β : Type v} [DecidableEq α]
variable {M : Matrix n n R}
namespace Matrix
theorem charmatrix_apply_natDegree [Nontrivial R] (i j : n) :
(charmatrix M i j).natDegree = ite (i = j) 1 0 := by
by_cases h : i = j <;> simp [h, ← degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq_of_pos (Nat.succ_pos 0)]
#align charmatrix_apply_nat_degree Matrix.charmatrix_apply_natDegree
theorem charmatrix_apply_natDegree_le (i j : n) :
(charmatrix M i j).natDegree ≤ ite (i = j) 1 0 := by
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h, natDegree_X_le]
#align charmatrix_apply_nat_degree_le Matrix.charmatrix_apply_natDegree_le
variable (M)
theorem charpoly_sub_diagonal_degree_lt :
(M.charpoly - ∏ i : n, (X - C (M i i))).degree < ↑(Fintype.card n - 1) := by
rw [charpoly, det_apply', ← insert_erase (mem_univ (Equiv.refl n)),
sum_insert (not_mem_erase (Equiv.refl n) univ), add_comm]
simp only [charmatrix_apply_eq, one_mul, Equiv.Perm.sign_refl, id, Int.cast_one,
Units.val_one, add_sub_cancel_right, Equiv.coe_refl]
rw [← mem_degreeLT]
apply Submodule.sum_mem (degreeLT R (Fintype.card n - 1))
intro c hc; rw [← C_eq_intCast, C_mul']
apply Submodule.smul_mem (degreeLT R (Fintype.card n - 1)) ↑↑(Equiv.Perm.sign c)
rw [mem_degreeLT]
apply lt_of_le_of_lt degree_le_natDegree _
rw [Nat.cast_lt]
apply lt_of_le_of_lt _ (Equiv.Perm.fixed_point_card_lt_of_ne_one (ne_of_mem_erase hc))
apply le_trans (Polynomial.natDegree_prod_le univ fun i : n => charmatrix M (c i) i) _
rw [card_eq_sum_ones]; rw [sum_filter]; apply sum_le_sum
intros
apply charmatrix_apply_natDegree_le
#align matrix.charpoly_sub_diagonal_degree_lt Matrix.charpoly_sub_diagonal_degree_lt
theorem charpoly_coeff_eq_prod_coeff_of_le {k : ℕ} (h : Fintype.card n - 1 ≤ k) :
M.charpoly.coeff k = (∏ i : n, (X - C (M i i))).coeff k := by
apply eq_of_sub_eq_zero; rw [← coeff_sub]
apply Polynomial.coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt
apply lt_of_lt_of_le (charpoly_sub_diagonal_degree_lt M) ?_
rw [Nat.cast_le]; apply h
#align matrix.charpoly_coeff_eq_prod_coeff_of_le Matrix.charpoly_coeff_eq_prod_coeff_of_le
theorem det_of_card_zero (h : Fintype.card n = 0) (M : Matrix n n R) : M.det = 1 := by
rw [Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff] at h
suffices M = 1 by simp [this]
ext i
exact h.elim i
#align matrix.det_of_card_zero Matrix.det_of_card_zero
theorem charpoly_degree_eq_dim [Nontrivial R] (M : Matrix n n R) :
M.charpoly.degree = Fintype.card n := by
by_cases h : Fintype.card n = 0
· rw [h]
unfold charpoly
rw [det_of_card_zero]
· simp
· assumption
rw [← sub_add_cancel M.charpoly (∏ i : n, (X - C (M i i)))]
-- Porting note: added `↑` in front of `Fintype.card n`
have h1 : (∏ i : n, (X - C (M i i))).degree = ↑(Fintype.card n) := by
rw [degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq_of_pos (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h), natDegree_prod']
· simp_rw [natDegree_X_sub_C]
rw [← Finset.card_univ, sum_const, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
simp_rw [(monic_X_sub_C _).leadingCoeff]
simp
rw [degree_add_eq_right_of_degree_lt]
· exact h1
rw [h1]
apply lt_trans (charpoly_sub_diagonal_degree_lt M)
rw [Nat.cast_lt]
rw [← Nat.pred_eq_sub_one]
apply Nat.pred_lt
apply h
#align matrix.charpoly_degree_eq_dim Matrix.charpoly_degree_eq_dim
@[simp] theorem charpoly_natDegree_eq_dim [Nontrivial R] (M : Matrix n n R) :
M.charpoly.natDegree = Fintype.card n :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (charpoly_degree_eq_dim M)
#align matrix.charpoly_nat_degree_eq_dim Matrix.charpoly_natDegree_eq_dim
theorem charpoly_monic (M : Matrix n n R) : M.charpoly.Monic := by
nontriviality R -- Porting note: was simply `nontriviality`
by_cases h : Fintype.card n = 0
· rw [charpoly, det_of_card_zero h]
apply monic_one
have mon : (∏ i : n, (X - C (M i i))).Monic := by
apply monic_prod_of_monic univ fun i : n => X - C (M i i)
simp [monic_X_sub_C]
rw [← sub_add_cancel (∏ i : n, (X - C (M i i))) M.charpoly] at mon
rw [Monic] at *
rwa [leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt] at mon
rw [charpoly_degree_eq_dim]
rw [← neg_sub]
rw [degree_neg]
apply lt_trans (charpoly_sub_diagonal_degree_lt M)
rw [Nat.cast_lt]
rw [← Nat.pred_eq_sub_one]
apply Nat.pred_lt
apply h
#align matrix.charpoly_monic Matrix.charpoly_monic
theorem trace_eq_neg_charpoly_coeff [Nonempty n] (M : Matrix n n R) :
trace M = -M.charpoly.coeff (Fintype.card n - 1) := by
rw [charpoly_coeff_eq_prod_coeff_of_le _ le_rfl, Fintype.card,
prod_X_sub_C_coeff_card_pred univ (fun i : n => M i i) Fintype.card_pos, neg_neg, trace]
simp_rw [diag_apply]
#align matrix.trace_eq_neg_charpoly_coeff Matrix.trace_eq_neg_charpoly_coeff
theorem matPolyEquiv_symm_map_eval (M : (Matrix n n R)[X]) (r : R) :
(matPolyEquiv.symm M).map (eval r) = M.eval (scalar n r) := by
suffices ((aeval r).mapMatrix.comp matPolyEquiv.symm.toAlgHom : (Matrix n n R)[X] →ₐ[R] _) =
(eval₂AlgHom' (AlgHom.id R _) (scalar n r)
fun x => (scalar_commute _ (Commute.all _) _).symm) from
DFunLike.congr_fun this M
ext : 1
· ext M : 1
simp [Function.comp]
· simp [smul_eq_diagonal_mul]
theorem matPolyEquiv_eval_eq_map (M : Matrix n n R[X]) (r : R) :
(matPolyEquiv M).eval (scalar n r) = M.map (eval r) := by
simpa only [AlgEquiv.symm_apply_apply] using (matPolyEquiv_symm_map_eval (matPolyEquiv M) r).symm
-- I feel like this should use `Polynomial.algHom_eval₂_algebraMap`
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Charpoly/Coeff.lean | 172 | 174 | theorem matPolyEquiv_eval (M : Matrix n n R[X]) (r : R) (i j : n) :
(matPolyEquiv M).eval (scalar n r) i j = (M i j).eval r := by |
rw [matPolyEquiv_eval_eq_map, map_apply]
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.SetIntegral
#align_import measure_theory.integral.average from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c14c8fcde993801fca8946b0d80131a1a81d1520"
open ENNReal MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Metric Set Filter TopologicalSpace Function
open scoped Topology ENNReal Convex
variable {α E F : Type*} {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[CompleteSpace E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [CompleteSpace F] {μ ν : Measure α}
{s t : Set α}
namespace MeasureTheory
section NormedAddCommGroup
variable (μ)
variable {f g : α → E}
noncomputable def average (f : α → E) :=
∫ x, f x ∂(μ univ)⁻¹ • μ
#align measure_theory.average MeasureTheory.average
notation3 "⨍ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => average μ r
notation3 "⨍ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => average volume f) => r
notation3 "⨍ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => average (Measure.restrict μ s) r
notation3 "⨍ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => average (Measure.restrict volume s) f) => r
@[simp]
theorem average_zero : ⨍ _, (0 : E) ∂μ = 0 := by rw [average, integral_zero]
#align measure_theory.average_zero MeasureTheory.average_zero
@[simp]
theorem average_zero_measure (f : α → E) : ⨍ x, f x ∂(0 : Measure α) = 0 := by
rw [average, smul_zero, integral_zero_measure]
#align measure_theory.average_zero_measure MeasureTheory.average_zero_measure
@[simp]
theorem average_neg (f : α → E) : ⨍ x, -f x ∂μ = -⨍ x, f x ∂μ :=
integral_neg f
#align measure_theory.average_neg MeasureTheory.average_neg
theorem average_eq' (f : α → E) : ⨍ x, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂(μ univ)⁻¹ • μ :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.average_eq' MeasureTheory.average_eq'
theorem average_eq (f : α → E) : ⨍ x, f x ∂μ = (μ univ).toReal⁻¹ • ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
rw [average_eq', integral_smul_measure, ENNReal.toReal_inv]
#align measure_theory.average_eq MeasureTheory.average_eq
theorem average_eq_integral [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (f : α → E) : ⨍ x, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
rw [average, measure_univ, inv_one, one_smul]
#align measure_theory.average_eq_integral MeasureTheory.average_eq_integral
@[simp]
theorem measure_smul_average [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (f : α → E) :
(μ univ).toReal • ⨍ x, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
rcases eq_or_ne μ 0 with hμ | hμ
· rw [hμ, integral_zero_measure, average_zero_measure, smul_zero]
· rw [average_eq, smul_inv_smul₀]
refine (ENNReal.toReal_pos ?_ <| measure_ne_top _ _).ne'
rwa [Ne, measure_univ_eq_zero]
#align measure_theory.measure_smul_average MeasureTheory.measure_smul_average
theorem setAverage_eq (f : α → E) (s : Set α) :
⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ = (μ s).toReal⁻¹ • ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ := by rw [average_eq, restrict_apply_univ]
#align measure_theory.set_average_eq MeasureTheory.setAverage_eq
theorem setAverage_eq' (f : α → E) (s : Set α) :
⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂(μ s)⁻¹ • μ.restrict s := by
simp only [average_eq', restrict_apply_univ]
#align measure_theory.set_average_eq' MeasureTheory.setAverage_eq'
variable {μ}
theorem average_congr {f g : α → E} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : ⨍ x, f x ∂μ = ⨍ x, g x ∂μ := by
simp only [average_eq, integral_congr_ae h]
#align measure_theory.average_congr MeasureTheory.average_congr
theorem setAverage_congr (h : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : ⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ = ⨍ x in t, f x ∂μ := by
simp only [setAverage_eq, setIntegral_congr_set_ae h, measure_congr h]
#align measure_theory.set_average_congr MeasureTheory.setAverage_congr
theorem setAverage_congr_fun (hs : MeasurableSet s) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x = g x) :
⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ = ⨍ x in s, g x ∂μ := by simp only [average_eq, setIntegral_congr_ae hs h]
#align measure_theory.set_average_congr_fun MeasureTheory.setAverage_congr_fun
theorem average_add_measure [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {ν : Measure α} [IsFiniteMeasure ν] {f : α → E}
(hμ : Integrable f μ) (hν : Integrable f ν) :
⨍ x, f x ∂(μ + ν) =
((μ univ).toReal / ((μ univ).toReal + (ν univ).toReal)) • ⨍ x, f x ∂μ +
((ν univ).toReal / ((μ univ).toReal + (ν univ).toReal)) • ⨍ x, f x ∂ν := by
simp only [div_eq_inv_mul, mul_smul, measure_smul_average, ← smul_add,
← integral_add_measure hμ hν, ← ENNReal.toReal_add (measure_ne_top μ _) (measure_ne_top ν _)]
rw [average_eq, Measure.add_apply]
#align measure_theory.average_add_measure MeasureTheory.average_add_measure
theorem average_pair {f : α → E} {g : α → F} (hfi : Integrable f μ) (hgi : Integrable g μ) :
⨍ x, (f x, g x) ∂μ = (⨍ x, f x ∂μ, ⨍ x, g x ∂μ) :=
integral_pair hfi.to_average hgi.to_average
#align measure_theory.average_pair MeasureTheory.average_pair
theorem measure_smul_setAverage (f : α → E) {s : Set α} (h : μ s ≠ ∞) :
(μ s).toReal • ⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ := by
haveI := Fact.mk h.lt_top
rw [← measure_smul_average, restrict_apply_univ]
#align measure_theory.measure_smul_set_average MeasureTheory.measure_smul_setAverage
theorem average_union {f : α → E} {s t : Set α} (hd : AEDisjoint μ s t) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ)
(hsμ : μ s ≠ ∞) (htμ : μ t ≠ ∞) (hfs : IntegrableOn f s μ) (hft : IntegrableOn f t μ) :
⨍ x in s ∪ t, f x ∂μ =
((μ s).toReal / ((μ s).toReal + (μ t).toReal)) • ⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ +
((μ t).toReal / ((μ s).toReal + (μ t).toReal)) • ⨍ x in t, f x ∂μ := by
haveI := Fact.mk hsμ.lt_top; haveI := Fact.mk htμ.lt_top
rw [restrict_union₀ hd ht, average_add_measure hfs hft, restrict_apply_univ, restrict_apply_univ]
#align measure_theory.average_union MeasureTheory.average_union
theorem average_union_mem_openSegment {f : α → E} {s t : Set α} (hd : AEDisjoint μ s t)
(ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) (hs₀ : μ s ≠ 0) (ht₀ : μ t ≠ 0) (hsμ : μ s ≠ ∞) (htμ : μ t ≠ ∞)
(hfs : IntegrableOn f s μ) (hft : IntegrableOn f t μ) :
⨍ x in s ∪ t, f x ∂μ ∈ openSegment ℝ (⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ) (⨍ x in t, f x ∂μ) := by
replace hs₀ : 0 < (μ s).toReal := ENNReal.toReal_pos hs₀ hsμ
replace ht₀ : 0 < (μ t).toReal := ENNReal.toReal_pos ht₀ htμ
exact mem_openSegment_iff_div.mpr
⟨(μ s).toReal, (μ t).toReal, hs₀, ht₀, (average_union hd ht hsμ htμ hfs hft).symm⟩
#align measure_theory.average_union_mem_open_segment MeasureTheory.average_union_mem_openSegment
theorem average_union_mem_segment {f : α → E} {s t : Set α} (hd : AEDisjoint μ s t)
(ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) (hsμ : μ s ≠ ∞) (htμ : μ t ≠ ∞) (hfs : IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hft : IntegrableOn f t μ) :
⨍ x in s ∪ t, f x ∂μ ∈ [⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ -[ℝ] ⨍ x in t, f x ∂μ] := by
by_cases hse : μ s = 0
· rw [← ae_eq_empty] at hse
rw [restrict_congr_set (hse.union EventuallyEq.rfl), empty_union]
exact right_mem_segment _ _ _
· refine
mem_segment_iff_div.mpr
⟨(μ s).toReal, (μ t).toReal, ENNReal.toReal_nonneg, ENNReal.toReal_nonneg, ?_,
(average_union hd ht hsμ htμ hfs hft).symm⟩
calc
0 < (μ s).toReal := ENNReal.toReal_pos hse hsμ
_ ≤ _ := le_add_of_nonneg_right ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
#align measure_theory.average_union_mem_segment MeasureTheory.average_union_mem_segment
theorem average_mem_openSegment_compl_self [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : α → E} {s : Set α}
(hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hs₀ : μ s ≠ 0) (hsc₀ : μ sᶜ ≠ 0) (hfi : Integrable f μ) :
⨍ x, f x ∂μ ∈ openSegment ℝ (⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ) (⨍ x in sᶜ, f x ∂μ) := by
simpa only [union_compl_self, restrict_univ] using
average_union_mem_openSegment aedisjoint_compl_right hs.compl hs₀ hsc₀ (measure_ne_top _ _)
(measure_ne_top _ _) hfi.integrableOn hfi.integrableOn
#align measure_theory.average_mem_open_segment_compl_self MeasureTheory.average_mem_openSegment_compl_self
@[simp]
theorem average_const (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] [h : NeZero μ] (c : E) :
⨍ _x, c ∂μ = c := by
rw [average, integral_const, measure_univ, ENNReal.one_toReal, one_smul]
#align measure_theory.average_const MeasureTheory.average_const
theorem setAverage_const {s : Set α} (hs₀ : μ s ≠ 0) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (c : E) :
⨍ _ in s, c ∂μ = c :=
have := NeZero.mk hs₀; have := Fact.mk hs.lt_top; average_const _ _
#align measure_theory.set_average_const MeasureTheory.setAverage_const
-- Porting note (#10618): was `@[simp]` but `simp` can prove it
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Average.lean | 450 | 451 | theorem integral_average (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (f : α → E) :
∫ _, ⨍ a, f a ∂μ ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by | simp
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Circle
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.Basic
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.oriented.rotation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0c8bf9245297a541f468be517f1bde6195105e9"
noncomputable section
open FiniteDimensional Complex
open scoped Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace Orientation
attribute [local instance] Complex.finrank_real_complex_fact
variable {V V' : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedAddCommGroup V']
variable [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V']
variable [Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Fact (finrank ℝ V' = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
local notation "J" => o.rightAngleRotation
def rotationAux (θ : Real.Angle) : V →ₗᵢ[ℝ] V :=
LinearMap.isometryOfInner
(Real.Angle.cos θ • LinearMap.id +
Real.Angle.sin θ • (LinearIsometryEquiv.toLinearEquiv J).toLinearMap)
(by
intro x y
simp only [RCLike.conj_to_real, id, LinearMap.smul_apply, LinearMap.add_apply,
LinearMap.id_coe, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_toLinearEquiv,
Orientation.areaForm_rightAngleRotation_left, Orientation.inner_rightAngleRotation_left,
Orientation.inner_rightAngleRotation_right, inner_add_left, inner_smul_left,
inner_add_right, inner_smul_right]
linear_combination inner (𝕜 := ℝ) x y * θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq)
#align orientation.rotation_aux Orientation.rotationAux
@[simp]
theorem rotationAux_apply (θ : Real.Angle) (x : V) :
o.rotationAux θ x = Real.Angle.cos θ • x + Real.Angle.sin θ • J x :=
rfl
#align orientation.rotation_aux_apply Orientation.rotationAux_apply
def rotation (θ : Real.Angle) : V ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] V :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ofLinearIsometry (o.rotationAux θ)
(Real.Angle.cos θ • LinearMap.id -
Real.Angle.sin θ • (LinearIsometryEquiv.toLinearEquiv J).toLinearMap)
(by
ext x
convert congr_arg (fun t : ℝ => t • x) θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq using 1
· simp only [o.rightAngleRotation_rightAngleRotation, o.rotationAux_apply,
Function.comp_apply, id, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearIsometry.coe_toLinearMap,
LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_toLinearEquiv, map_smul, map_sub, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LinearMap.id_coe, LinearMap.smul_apply, LinearMap.sub_apply, ← mul_smul, add_smul,
smul_add, smul_neg, smul_sub, mul_comm, sq]
abel
· simp)
(by
ext x
convert congr_arg (fun t : ℝ => t • x) θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq using 1
· simp only [o.rightAngleRotation_rightAngleRotation, o.rotationAux_apply,
Function.comp_apply, id, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearIsometry.coe_toLinearMap,
LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_toLinearEquiv, map_add, map_smul, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LinearMap.id_coe, LinearMap.smul_apply, LinearMap.sub_apply,
add_smul, smul_neg, smul_sub, smul_smul]
ring_nf
abel
· simp)
#align orientation.rotation Orientation.rotation
theorem rotation_apply (θ : Real.Angle) (x : V) :
o.rotation θ x = Real.Angle.cos θ • x + Real.Angle.sin θ • J x :=
rfl
#align orientation.rotation_apply Orientation.rotation_apply
theorem rotation_symm_apply (θ : Real.Angle) (x : V) :
(o.rotation θ).symm x = Real.Angle.cos θ • x - Real.Angle.sin θ • J x :=
rfl
#align orientation.rotation_symm_apply Orientation.rotation_symm_apply
theorem rotation_eq_matrix_toLin (θ : Real.Angle) {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(o.rotation θ).toLinearMap =
Matrix.toLin (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx) (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx)
!![θ.cos, -θ.sin; θ.sin, θ.cos] := by
apply (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx).ext
intro i
fin_cases i
· rw [Matrix.toLin_self]
simp [rotation_apply, Fin.sum_univ_succ]
· rw [Matrix.toLin_self]
simp [rotation_apply, Fin.sum_univ_succ, add_comm]
#align orientation.rotation_eq_matrix_to_lin Orientation.rotation_eq_matrix_toLin
@[simp]
theorem det_rotation (θ : Real.Angle) : LinearMap.det (o.rotation θ).toLinearMap = 1 := by
haveI : Nontrivial V :=
FiniteDimensional.nontrivial_of_finrank_eq_succ (@Fact.out (finrank ℝ V = 2) _)
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ : ∃ x, x ≠ (0 : V) := exists_ne (0 : V)
rw [o.rotation_eq_matrix_toLin θ hx]
simpa [sq] using θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq
#align orientation.det_rotation Orientation.det_rotation
@[simp]
theorem linearEquiv_det_rotation (θ : Real.Angle) :
LinearEquiv.det (o.rotation θ).toLinearEquiv = 1 :=
Units.ext <| by
-- Porting note: Lean can't see through `LinearEquiv.coe_det` and needed the rewrite
-- in mathlib3 this was just `units.ext <| o.det_rotation θ`
simpa only [LinearEquiv.coe_det, Units.val_one] using o.det_rotation θ
#align orientation.linear_equiv_det_rotation Orientation.linearEquiv_det_rotation
@[simp]
theorem rotation_symm (θ : Real.Angle) : (o.rotation θ).symm = o.rotation (-θ) := by
ext; simp [o.rotation_apply, o.rotation_symm_apply, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align orientation.rotation_symm Orientation.rotation_symm
@[simp]
theorem rotation_zero : o.rotation 0 = LinearIsometryEquiv.refl ℝ V := by ext; simp [rotation]
#align orientation.rotation_zero Orientation.rotation_zero
@[simp]
theorem rotation_pi : o.rotation π = LinearIsometryEquiv.neg ℝ := by
ext x
simp [rotation]
#align orientation.rotation_pi Orientation.rotation_pi
theorem rotation_pi_apply (x : V) : o.rotation π x = -x := by simp
#align orientation.rotation_pi_apply Orientation.rotation_pi_apply
theorem rotation_pi_div_two : o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) = J := by
ext x
simp [rotation]
#align orientation.rotation_pi_div_two Orientation.rotation_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem rotation_rotation (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) (x : V) :
o.rotation θ₁ (o.rotation θ₂ x) = o.rotation (θ₁ + θ₂) x := by
simp only [o.rotation_apply, ← mul_smul, Real.Angle.cos_add, Real.Angle.sin_add, add_smul,
sub_smul, LinearIsometryEquiv.trans_apply, smul_add, LinearIsometryEquiv.map_add,
LinearIsometryEquiv.map_smul, rightAngleRotation_rightAngleRotation, smul_neg]
ring_nf
abel
#align orientation.rotation_rotation Orientation.rotation_rotation
@[simp]
theorem rotation_trans (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) :
(o.rotation θ₁).trans (o.rotation θ₂) = o.rotation (θ₂ + θ₁) :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ext fun _ => by rw [← rotation_rotation, LinearIsometryEquiv.trans_apply]
#align orientation.rotation_trans Orientation.rotation_trans
@[simp]
theorem kahler_rotation_left (x y : V) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.kahler (o.rotation θ x) y = conj (θ.expMapCircle : ℂ) * o.kahler x y := by
-- Porting note: this needed the `Complex.conj_ofReal` instead of `RCLike.conj_ofReal`;
-- I believe this is because the respective coercions are no longer defeq, and
-- `Real.Angle.coe_expMapCircle` uses the `Complex` version.
simp only [o.rotation_apply, map_add, map_mul, LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, RingHom.id_apply,
LinearMap.add_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, real_smul, kahler_rightAngleRotation_left,
Real.Angle.coe_expMapCircle, Complex.conj_ofReal, conj_I]
ring
#align orientation.kahler_rotation_left Orientation.kahler_rotation_left
theorem neg_rotation (θ : Real.Angle) (x : V) : -o.rotation θ x = o.rotation (π + θ) x := by
rw [← o.rotation_pi_apply, rotation_rotation]
#align orientation.neg_rotation Orientation.neg_rotation
@[simp]
theorem neg_rotation_neg_pi_div_two (x : V) :
-o.rotation (-π / 2 : ℝ) x = o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x := by
rw [neg_rotation, ← Real.Angle.coe_add, neg_div, ← sub_eq_add_neg, sub_half]
#align orientation.neg_rotation_neg_pi_div_two Orientation.neg_rotation_neg_pi_div_two
theorem neg_rotation_pi_div_two (x : V) : -o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x = o.rotation (-π / 2 : ℝ) x :=
(neg_eq_iff_eq_neg.mp <| o.neg_rotation_neg_pi_div_two _).symm
#align orientation.neg_rotation_pi_div_two Orientation.neg_rotation_pi_div_two
theorem kahler_rotation_left' (x y : V) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.kahler (o.rotation θ x) y = (-θ).expMapCircle * o.kahler x y := by
simp only [Real.Angle.expMapCircle_neg, coe_inv_circle_eq_conj, kahler_rotation_left]
#align orientation.kahler_rotation_left' Orientation.kahler_rotation_left'
@[simp]
theorem kahler_rotation_right (x y : V) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.kahler x (o.rotation θ y) = θ.expMapCircle * o.kahler x y := by
simp only [o.rotation_apply, map_add, LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, RingHom.id_apply, real_smul,
kahler_rightAngleRotation_right, Real.Angle.coe_expMapCircle]
ring
#align orientation.kahler_rotation_right Orientation.kahler_rotation_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_rotation_left {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.oangle (o.rotation θ x) y = o.oangle x y - θ := by
simp only [oangle, o.kahler_rotation_left']
rw [Complex.arg_mul_coe_angle, Real.Angle.arg_expMapCircle]
· abel
· exact ne_zero_of_mem_circle _
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
#align orientation.oangle_rotation_left Orientation.oangle_rotation_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_rotation_right {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.oangle x (o.rotation θ y) = o.oangle x y + θ := by
simp only [oangle, o.kahler_rotation_right]
rw [Complex.arg_mul_coe_angle, Real.Angle.arg_expMapCircle]
· abel
· exact ne_zero_of_mem_circle _
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
#align orientation.oangle_rotation_right Orientation.oangle_rotation_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_rotation_self_left {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.oangle (o.rotation θ x) x = -θ := by simp [hx]
#align orientation.oangle_rotation_self_left Orientation.oangle_rotation_self_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_rotation_self_right {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.oangle x (o.rotation θ x) = θ := by simp [hx]
#align orientation.oangle_rotation_self_right Orientation.oangle_rotation_self_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_rotation_oangle_left (x y : V) : o.oangle (o.rotation (o.oangle x y) x) y = 0 := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
· simp [hx, hy]
#align orientation.oangle_rotation_oangle_left Orientation.oangle_rotation_oangle_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_rotation_oangle_right (x y : V) : o.oangle y (o.rotation (o.oangle x y) x) = 0 := by
rw [oangle_rev]
simp
#align orientation.oangle_rotation_oangle_right Orientation.oangle_rotation_oangle_right
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Rotation.lean | 278 | 280 | theorem oangle_rotation (x y : V) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.oangle (o.rotation θ x) (o.rotation θ y) = o.oangle x y := by |
by_cases hx : x = 0 <;> by_cases hy : y = 0 <;> simp [hx, hy]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorial.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Monotone.Basic
#align_import data.nat.choose.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f3994e1b117b1e1da49bcfb67334f33460c3ce4"
open Nat
namespace Nat
def choose : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ
| _, 0 => 1
| 0, _ + 1 => 0
| n + 1, k + 1 => choose n k + choose n (k + 1)
#align nat.choose Nat.choose
@[simp]
theorem choose_zero_right (n : ℕ) : choose n 0 = 1 := by cases n <;> rfl
#align nat.choose_zero_right Nat.choose_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem choose_zero_succ (k : ℕ) : choose 0 (succ k) = 0 :=
rfl
#align nat.choose_zero_succ Nat.choose_zero_succ
theorem choose_succ_succ (n k : ℕ) : choose (succ n) (succ k) = choose n k + choose n (succ k) :=
rfl
#align nat.choose_succ_succ Nat.choose_succ_succ
theorem choose_succ_succ' (n k : ℕ) : choose (n + 1) (k + 1) = choose n k + choose n (k + 1) :=
rfl
theorem choose_eq_zero_of_lt : ∀ {n k}, n < k → choose n k = 0
| _, 0, hk => absurd hk (Nat.not_lt_zero _)
| 0, k + 1, _ => choose_zero_succ _
| n + 1, k + 1, hk => by
have hnk : n < k := lt_of_succ_lt_succ hk
have hnk1 : n < k + 1 := lt_of_succ_lt hk
rw [choose_succ_succ, choose_eq_zero_of_lt hnk, choose_eq_zero_of_lt hnk1]
#align nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem choose_self (n : ℕ) : choose n n = 1 := by
induction n <;> simp [*, choose, choose_eq_zero_of_lt (lt_succ_self _)]
#align nat.choose_self Nat.choose_self
@[simp]
theorem choose_succ_self (n : ℕ) : choose n (succ n) = 0 :=
choose_eq_zero_of_lt (lt_succ_self _)
#align nat.choose_succ_self Nat.choose_succ_self
@[simp]
lemma choose_one_right (n : ℕ) : choose n 1 = n := by induction n <;> simp [*, choose, Nat.add_comm]
#align nat.choose_one_right Nat.choose_one_right
-- The `n+1`-st triangle number is `n` more than the `n`-th triangle number
theorem triangle_succ (n : ℕ) : (n + 1) * (n + 1 - 1) / 2 = n * (n - 1) / 2 + n := by
rw [← add_mul_div_left, Nat.mul_comm 2 n, ← Nat.mul_add, Nat.add_sub_cancel, Nat.mul_comm]
cases n <;> rfl; apply zero_lt_succ
#align nat.triangle_succ Nat.triangle_succ
theorem choose_two_right (n : ℕ) : choose n 2 = n * (n - 1) / 2 := by
induction' n with n ih
· simp
· rw [triangle_succ n, choose, ih]
simp [Nat.add_comm]
#align nat.choose_two_right Nat.choose_two_right
theorem choose_pos : ∀ {n k}, k ≤ n → 0 < choose n k
| 0, _, hk => by rw [Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero hk]; decide
| n + 1, 0, _ => by simp
| n + 1, k + 1, hk => Nat.add_pos_left (choose_pos (le_of_succ_le_succ hk)) _
#align nat.choose_pos Nat.choose_pos
theorem choose_eq_zero_iff {n k : ℕ} : n.choose k = 0 ↔ n < k :=
⟨fun h => lt_of_not_ge (mt Nat.choose_pos h.symm.not_lt), Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt⟩
#align nat.choose_eq_zero_iff Nat.choose_eq_zero_iff
theorem succ_mul_choose_eq : ∀ n k, succ n * choose n k = choose (succ n) (succ k) * succ k
| 0, 0 => by decide
| 0, k + 1 => by simp [choose]
| n + 1, 0 => by simp [choose, mul_succ, succ_eq_add_one, Nat.add_comm]
| n + 1, k + 1 => by
rw [choose_succ_succ (succ n) (succ k), Nat.add_mul, ← succ_mul_choose_eq n, mul_succ, ←
succ_mul_choose_eq n, Nat.add_right_comm, ← Nat.mul_add, ← choose_succ_succ, ← succ_mul]
#align nat.succ_mul_choose_eq Nat.succ_mul_choose_eq
theorem choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial : ∀ {n k}, k ≤ n → choose n k * k ! * (n - k)! = n !
| 0, _, hk => by simp [Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero hk]
| n + 1, 0, _ => by simp
| n + 1, succ k, hk => by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hk with hk₁ | hk₁
· have h : choose n k * k.succ ! * (n - k)! = (k + 1) * n ! := by
rw [← choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (le_of_succ_le_succ hk)]
simp [factorial_succ, Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_left_comm, Nat.mul_assoc]
have h₁ : (n - k)! = (n - k) * (n - k.succ)! := by
rw [← succ_sub_succ, succ_sub (le_of_lt_succ hk₁), factorial_succ]
have h₂ : choose n (succ k) * k.succ ! * ((n - k) * (n - k.succ)!) = (n - k) * n ! := by
rw [← choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (le_of_lt_succ hk₁)]
simp [factorial_succ, Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_left_comm, Nat.mul_assoc]
have h₃ : k * n ! ≤ n * n ! := Nat.mul_le_mul_right _ (le_of_succ_le_succ hk)
rw [choose_succ_succ, Nat.add_mul, Nat.add_mul, succ_sub_succ, h, h₁, h₂, Nat.add_mul,
Nat.mul_sub_right_distrib, factorial_succ, ← Nat.add_sub_assoc h₃, Nat.add_assoc,
← Nat.add_mul, Nat.add_sub_cancel_left, Nat.add_comm]
· rw [hk₁]; simp [hk₁, Nat.mul_comm, choose, Nat.sub_self]
#align nat.choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial Nat.choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial
theorem choose_mul {n k s : ℕ} (hkn : k ≤ n) (hsk : s ≤ k) :
n.choose k * k.choose s = n.choose s * (n - s).choose (k - s) :=
have h : 0 < (n - k)! * (k - s)! * s ! := by apply_rules [factorial_pos, Nat.mul_pos]
Nat.mul_right_cancel h <|
calc
n.choose k * k.choose s * ((n - k)! * (k - s)! * s !) =
n.choose k * (k.choose s * s ! * (k - s)!) * (n - k)! := by
rw [Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_assoc _ s !, Nat.mul_assoc,
Nat.mul_comm (n - k)!, Nat.mul_comm s !]
_ = n ! := by
rw [choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial hsk, choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial hkn]
_ = n.choose s * s ! * ((n - s).choose (k - s) * (k - s)! * (n - s - (k - s))!) := by
rw [choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (Nat.sub_le_sub_right hkn _),
choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (hsk.trans hkn)]
_ = n.choose s * (n - s).choose (k - s) * ((n - k)! * (k - s)! * s !) := by
rw [Nat.sub_sub_sub_cancel_right hsk, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_left_comm s !, Nat.mul_assoc,
Nat.mul_comm (k - s)!, Nat.mul_comm s !, Nat.mul_right_comm, ← Nat.mul_assoc]
#align nat.choose_mul Nat.choose_mul
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Choose/Basic.lean | 164 | 167 | theorem choose_eq_factorial_div_factorial {n k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ n) :
choose n k = n ! / (k ! * (n - k)!) := by |
rw [← choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial hk, Nat.mul_assoc]
exact (mul_div_left _ (Nat.mul_pos (factorial_pos _) (factorial_pos _))).symm
|
import Mathlib.Dynamics.Ergodic.MeasurePreserving
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SimpleFunc
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.MutuallySingular
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Count
import Mathlib.Topology.IndicatorConstPointwise
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Real
#align_import measure_theory.integral.lebesgue from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c14c8fcde993801fca8946b0d80131a1a81d1520"
assert_not_exists NormedSpace
set_option autoImplicit true
noncomputable section
open Set hiding restrict restrict_apply
open Filter ENNReal
open Function (support)
open scoped Classical
open Topology NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
section Lintegral
open SimpleFunc
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ ν : Measure α}
irreducible_def lintegral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨆ (g : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) (_ : ⇑g ≤ f), g.lintegral μ
#align measure_theory.lintegral MeasureTheory.lintegral
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3 "∫⁻ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => lintegral μ r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3 "∫⁻ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => lintegral volume f) => r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3"∫⁻ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => lintegral (Measure.restrict μ s) r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3"∫⁻ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => lintegral (Measure.restrict volume s) f) => r
theorem SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = f.lintegral μ := by
rw [MeasureTheory.lintegral]
exact le_antisymm (iSup₂_le fun g hg => lintegral_mono hg <| le_rfl)
(le_iSup₂_of_le f le_rfl le_rfl)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.lintegral_eq_lintegral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral
@[mono]
theorem lintegral_mono' {m : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃μ ν : Measure α⦄ (hμν : μ ≤ ν) ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄
(hfg : f ≤ g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂ν := by
rw [lintegral, lintegral]
exact iSup_mono fun φ => iSup_mono' fun hφ => ⟨le_trans hφ hfg, lintegral_mono (le_refl φ) hμν⟩
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono'
-- workaround for the known eta-reduction issue with `@[gcongr]`
@[gcongr] theorem lintegral_mono_fn' ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄ (hfg : ∀ x, f x ≤ g x) (h2 : μ ≤ ν) :
lintegral μ f ≤ lintegral ν g :=
lintegral_mono' h2 hfg
theorem lintegral_mono ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄ (hfg : f ≤ g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' (le_refl μ) hfg
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono
-- workaround for the known eta-reduction issue with `@[gcongr]`
@[gcongr] theorem lintegral_mono_fn ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄ (hfg : ∀ x, f x ≤ g x) :
lintegral μ f ≤ lintegral μ g :=
lintegral_mono hfg
theorem lintegral_mono_nnreal {f g : α → ℝ≥0} (h : f ≤ g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono fun a => ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (h a)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_nnreal MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_nnreal
theorem iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨆ (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) (_ : Measurable g) (_ : g ≤ f), ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
apply le_antisymm
· exact iSup_le fun i => iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le fun h'i => lintegral_mono h'i
· rw [lintegral]
refine iSup₂_le fun i hi => le_iSup₂_of_le i i.measurable <| le_iSup_of_le hi ?_
exact le_of_eq (i.lintegral_eq_lintegral _).symm
#align measure_theory.supr_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral MeasureTheory.iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral
theorem lintegral_mono_set {_ : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃μ : Measure α⦄ {s t : Set α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hst : s ⊆ t) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' (Measure.restrict_mono hst (le_refl μ)) (le_refl f)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_set MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_set
theorem lintegral_mono_set' {_ : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃μ : Measure α⦄ {s t : Set α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hst : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' (Measure.restrict_mono' hst (le_refl μ)) (le_refl f)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_set' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_set'
theorem monotone_lintegral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : Monotone (lintegral μ) :=
lintegral_mono
#align measure_theory.monotone_lintegral MeasureTheory.monotone_lintegral
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_const (c : ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ _, c ∂μ = c * μ univ := by
rw [← SimpleFunc.const_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral, SimpleFunc.coe_const]
rfl
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const MeasureTheory.lintegral_const
theorem lintegral_zero : ∫⁻ _ : α, 0 ∂μ = 0 := by simp
#align measure_theory.lintegral_zero MeasureTheory.lintegral_zero
theorem lintegral_zero_fun : lintegral μ (0 : α → ℝ≥0∞) = 0 :=
lintegral_zero
#align measure_theory.lintegral_zero_fun MeasureTheory.lintegral_zero_fun
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem lintegral_one : ∫⁻ _, (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ = μ univ := by rw [lintegral_const, one_mul]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_one MeasureTheory.lintegral_one
theorem set_lintegral_const (s : Set α) (c : ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ _ in s, c ∂μ = c * μ s := by
rw [lintegral_const, Measure.restrict_apply_univ]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_const MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_const
theorem set_lintegral_one (s) : ∫⁻ _ in s, 1 ∂μ = μ s := by rw [set_lintegral_const, one_mul]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_one MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_one
theorem set_lintegral_const_lt_top [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (s : Set α) {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ _ in s, c ∂μ < ∞ := by
rw [lintegral_const]
exact ENNReal.mul_lt_top hc (measure_ne_top (μ.restrict s) univ)
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_const_lt_top MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_const_lt_top
theorem lintegral_const_lt_top [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) : ∫⁻ _, c ∂μ < ∞ := by
simpa only [Measure.restrict_univ] using set_lintegral_const_lt_top (univ : Set α) hc
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_lt_top MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_lt_top
section
variable (μ)
theorem exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∃ g : α → ℝ≥0∞, Measurable g ∧ g ≤ f ∧ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rcases eq_or_ne (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) 0 with h₀ | h₀
· exact ⟨0, measurable_zero, zero_le f, h₀.trans lintegral_zero.symm⟩
rcases exists_seq_strictMono_tendsto' h₀.bot_lt with ⟨L, _, hLf, hL_tendsto⟩
have : ∀ n, ∃ g : α → ℝ≥0∞, Measurable g ∧ g ≤ f ∧ L n < ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
intro n
simpa only [← iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral f, lt_iSup_iff, exists_prop] using
(hLf n).2
choose g hgm hgf hLg using this
refine
⟨fun x => ⨆ n, g n x, measurable_iSup hgm, fun x => iSup_le fun n => hgf n x, le_antisymm ?_ ?_⟩
· refine le_of_tendsto' hL_tendsto fun n => (hLg n).le.trans <| lintegral_mono fun x => ?_
exact le_iSup (fun n => g n x) n
· exact lintegral_mono fun x => iSup_le fun n => hgf n x
#align measure_theory.exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq MeasureTheory.exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq
end
theorem lintegral_eq_nnreal {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ =
⨆ (φ : α →ₛ ℝ≥0) (_ : ∀ x, ↑(φ x) ≤ f x), (φ.map ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞)).lintegral μ := by
rw [lintegral]
refine
le_antisymm (iSup₂_le fun φ hφ => ?_) (iSup_mono' fun φ => ⟨φ.map ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞), le_rfl⟩)
by_cases h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, φ a ≠ ∞
· let ψ := φ.map ENNReal.toNNReal
replace h : ψ.map ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) =ᵐ[μ] φ := h.mono fun a => ENNReal.coe_toNNReal
have : ∀ x, ↑(ψ x) ≤ f x := fun x => le_trans ENNReal.coe_toNNReal_le_self (hφ x)
exact
le_iSup_of_le (φ.map ENNReal.toNNReal) (le_iSup_of_le this (ge_of_eq <| lintegral_congr h))
· have h_meas : μ (φ ⁻¹' {∞}) ≠ 0 := mt measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem.1 h
refine le_trans le_top (ge_of_eq <| (iSup_eq_top _).2 fun b hb => ?_)
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n : ℕ, b < n * μ (φ ⁻¹' {∞}) := exists_nat_mul_gt h_meas (ne_of_lt hb)
use (const α (n : ℝ≥0)).restrict (φ ⁻¹' {∞})
simp only [lt_iSup_iff, exists_prop, coe_restrict, φ.measurableSet_preimage, coe_const,
ENNReal.coe_indicator, map_coe_ennreal_restrict, SimpleFunc.map_const, ENNReal.coe_natCast,
restrict_const_lintegral]
refine ⟨indicator_le fun x hx => le_trans ?_ (hφ _), hn⟩
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_singleton_iff] at hx
simp only [hx, le_top]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_nnreal MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_nnreal
theorem exists_simpleFunc_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ φ : α →ₛ ℝ≥0,
(∀ x, ↑(φ x) ≤ f x) ∧
∀ ψ : α →ₛ ℝ≥0, (∀ x, ↑(ψ x) ≤ f x) → (map (↑) (ψ - φ)).lintegral μ < ε := by
rw [lintegral_eq_nnreal] at h
have := ENNReal.lt_add_right h hε
erw [ENNReal.biSup_add] at this <;> [skip; exact ⟨0, fun x => zero_le _⟩]
simp_rw [lt_iSup_iff, iSup_lt_iff, iSup_le_iff] at this
rcases this with ⟨φ, hle : ∀ x, ↑(φ x) ≤ f x, b, hbφ, hb⟩
refine ⟨φ, hle, fun ψ hψ => ?_⟩
have : (map (↑) φ).lintegral μ ≠ ∞ := ne_top_of_le_ne_top h (by exact le_iSup₂ (α := ℝ≥0∞) φ hle)
rw [← ENNReal.add_lt_add_iff_left this, ← add_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.map_add @ENNReal.coe_add]
refine (hb _ fun x => le_trans ?_ (max_le (hle x) (hψ x))).trans_lt hbφ
norm_cast
simp only [add_apply, sub_apply, add_tsub_eq_max]
rfl
#align measure_theory.exists_simple_func_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos MeasureTheory.exists_simpleFunc_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos
theorem iSup_lintegral_le {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨆ i, ∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, ⨆ i, f i a ∂μ := by
simp only [← iSup_apply]
exact (monotone_lintegral μ).le_map_iSup
#align measure_theory.supr_lintegral_le MeasureTheory.iSup_lintegral_le
theorem iSup₂_lintegral_le {ι : Sort*} {ι' : ι → Sort*} (f : ∀ i, ι' i → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨆ (i) (j), ∫⁻ a, f i j a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, ⨆ (i) (j), f i j a ∂μ := by
convert (monotone_lintegral μ).le_map_iSup₂ f with a
simp only [iSup_apply]
#align measure_theory.supr₂_lintegral_le MeasureTheory.iSup₂_lintegral_le
theorem le_iInf_lintegral {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ i, f i a ∂μ ≤ ⨅ i, ∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ := by
simp only [← iInf_apply]
exact (monotone_lintegral μ).map_iInf_le
#align measure_theory.le_infi_lintegral MeasureTheory.le_iInf_lintegral
theorem le_iInf₂_lintegral {ι : Sort*} {ι' : ι → Sort*} (f : ∀ i, ι' i → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ (i) (h : ι' i), f i h a ∂μ ≤ ⨅ (i) (h : ι' i), ∫⁻ a, f i h a ∂μ := by
convert (monotone_lintegral μ).map_iInf₂_le f with a
simp only [iInf_apply]
#align measure_theory.le_infi₂_lintegral MeasureTheory.le_iInf₂_lintegral
theorem lintegral_mono_ae {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, f a ≤ g a) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rcases exists_measurable_superset_of_null h with ⟨t, hts, ht, ht0⟩
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∉ t := measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem.1 ht0
rw [lintegral, lintegral]
refine iSup_le fun s => iSup_le fun hfs => le_iSup_of_le (s.restrict tᶜ) <| le_iSup_of_le ?_ ?_
· intro a
by_cases h : a ∈ t <;>
simp only [restrict_apply s ht.compl, mem_compl_iff, h, not_true, not_false_eq_true,
indicator_of_not_mem, zero_le, not_false_eq_true, indicator_of_mem]
exact le_trans (hfs a) (_root_.by_contradiction fun hnfg => h (hts hnfg))
· refine le_of_eq (SimpleFunc.lintegral_congr <| this.mono fun a hnt => ?_)
by_cases hat : a ∈ t <;> simp only [restrict_apply s ht.compl, mem_compl_iff, hat, not_true,
not_false_eq_true, indicator_of_not_mem, not_false_eq_true, indicator_of_mem]
exact (hnt hat).elim
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_ae MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_ae
theorem set_lintegral_mono_ae {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono_ae <| (ae_restrict_iff <| measurableSet_le hf hg).2 hfg
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_mono_ae MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_mono_ae
theorem set_lintegral_mono {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g)
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
set_lintegral_mono_ae hf hg (ae_of_all _ hfg)
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_mono MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_mono
theorem set_lintegral_mono_ae' {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono_ae <| (ae_restrict_iff' hs).2 hfg
theorem set_lintegral_mono' {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
set_lintegral_mono_ae' hs (ae_of_all _ hfg)
theorem set_lintegral_le_lintegral (s : Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' Measure.restrict_le_self le_rfl
theorem lintegral_congr_ae {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
le_antisymm (lintegral_mono_ae <| h.le) (lintegral_mono_ae <| h.symm.le)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_congr_ae MeasureTheory.lintegral_congr_ae
theorem lintegral_congr {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
simp only [h]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_congr MeasureTheory.lintegral_congr
theorem set_lintegral_congr {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s t : Set α} (h : s =ᵐ[μ] t) :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ := by rw [Measure.restrict_congr_set h]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_congr MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_congr
theorem set_lintegral_congr_fun {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x = g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_congr_ae]
rw [EventuallyEq]
rwa [ae_restrict_iff' hs]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_congr_fun MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_congr_fun
theorem lintegral_ofReal_le_lintegral_nnnorm (f : α → ℝ) :
∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
refine lintegral_mono fun x => ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal ?_
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact le_abs_self (f x)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_of_real_le_lintegral_nnnorm MeasureTheory.lintegral_ofReal_le_lintegral_nnnorm
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (h_nonneg : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) :
∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ := by
apply lintegral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [h_nonneg] with x hx
rw [Real.nnnorm_of_nonneg hx, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal hx]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (h_nonneg : 0 ≤ f) :
∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ :=
lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg (Filter.eventually_of_forall h_nonneg)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_nonneg MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_nonneg
theorem lintegral_iSup {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ n, Measurable (f n)) (h_mono : Monotone f) :
∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
set c : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞ := (↑)
set F := fun a : α => ⨆ n, f n a
refine le_antisymm ?_ (iSup_lintegral_le _)
rw [lintegral_eq_nnreal]
refine iSup_le fun s => iSup_le fun hsf => ?_
refine ENNReal.le_of_forall_lt_one_mul_le fun a ha => ?_
rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_coe.1 ha with ⟨r, rfl, _⟩
have ha : r < 1 := ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.1 ha
let rs := s.map fun a => r * a
have eq_rs : rs.map c = (const α r : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) * map c s := rfl
have eq : ∀ p, rs.map c ⁻¹' {p} = ⋃ n, rs.map c ⁻¹' {p} ∩ { a | p ≤ f n a } := by
intro p
rw [← inter_iUnion]; nth_rw 1 [← inter_univ (map c rs ⁻¹' {p})]
refine Set.ext fun x => and_congr_right fun hx => true_iff_iff.2 ?_
by_cases p_eq : p = 0
· simp [p_eq]
simp only [coe_map, mem_preimage, Function.comp_apply, mem_singleton_iff] at hx
subst hx
have : r * s x ≠ 0 := by rwa [Ne, ← ENNReal.coe_eq_zero]
have : s x ≠ 0 := right_ne_zero_of_mul this
have : (rs.map c) x < ⨆ n : ℕ, f n x := by
refine lt_of_lt_of_le (ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.2 ?_) (hsf x)
suffices r * s x < 1 * s x by simpa
exact mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right ha (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 this)
rcases lt_iSup_iff.1 this with ⟨i, hi⟩
exact mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, le_of_lt hi⟩
have mono : ∀ r : ℝ≥0∞, Monotone fun n => rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a } := by
intro r i j h
refine inter_subset_inter_right _ ?_
simp_rw [subset_def, mem_setOf]
intro x hx
exact le_trans hx (h_mono h x)
have h_meas : ∀ n, MeasurableSet {a : α | map c rs a ≤ f n a} := fun n =>
measurableSet_le (SimpleFunc.measurable _) (hf n)
calc
(r : ℝ≥0∞) * (s.map c).lintegral μ = ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, r * μ (rs.map c ⁻¹' {r}) := by
rw [← const_mul_lintegral, eq_rs, SimpleFunc.lintegral]
_ = ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, r * μ (⋃ n, rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a }) := by
simp only [(eq _).symm]
_ = ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, ⨆ n, r * μ (rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a }) :=
(Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x _ => by
rw [measure_iUnion_eq_iSup (mono x).directed_le, ENNReal.mul_iSup])
_ = ⨆ n, ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, r * μ (rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a }) := by
refine ENNReal.finset_sum_iSup_nat fun p i j h ↦ ?_
gcongr _ * μ ?_
exact mono p h
_ ≤ ⨆ n : ℕ, ((rs.map c).restrict { a | (rs.map c) a ≤ f n a }).lintegral μ := by
gcongr with n
rw [restrict_lintegral _ (h_meas n)]
refine le_of_eq (Finset.sum_congr rfl fun r _ => ?_)
congr 2 with a
refine and_congr_right ?_
simp (config := { contextual := true })
_ ≤ ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
simp only [← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral]
gcongr with n a
simp only [map_apply] at h_meas
simp only [coe_map, restrict_apply _ (h_meas _), (· ∘ ·)]
exact indicator_apply_le id
#align measure_theory.lintegral_supr MeasureTheory.lintegral_iSup
theorem lintegral_iSup' {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ)
(h_mono : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Monotone fun n => f n x) : ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← iSup_apply]
let p : α → (ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) → Prop := fun _ f' => Monotone f'
have hp : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x fun i => f i x := h_mono
have h_ae_seq_mono : Monotone (aeSeq hf p) := by
intro n m hnm x
by_cases hx : x ∈ aeSeqSet hf p
· exact aeSeq.prop_of_mem_aeSeqSet hf hx hnm
· simp only [aeSeq, hx, if_false, le_rfl]
rw [lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.iSup hf hp).symm]
simp_rw [iSup_apply]
rw [lintegral_iSup (aeSeq.measurable hf p) h_ae_seq_mono]
congr with n
exact lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.aeSeq_n_eq_fun_n_ae hf hp n)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_supr' MeasureTheory.lintegral_iSup'
theorem lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} {F : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ) (h_mono : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Monotone fun n => f n x)
(h_tendsto : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 <| F x)) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 <| ∫⁻ x, F x ∂μ) := by
have : Monotone fun n => ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ := fun i j hij =>
lintegral_mono_ae (h_mono.mono fun x hx => hx hij)
suffices key : ∫⁻ x, F x ∂μ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ by
rw [key]
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup this
rw [← lintegral_iSup' hf h_mono]
refine lintegral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [h_mono, h_tendsto] with _ hx_mono hx_tendsto using
tendsto_nhds_unique hx_tendsto (tendsto_atTop_iSup hx_mono)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone MeasureTheory.lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone
theorem lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ :=
calc
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, (eapprox f n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
congr; ext a; rw [iSup_eapprox_apply f hf]
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, (eapprox f n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
apply lintegral_iSup
· measurability
· intro i j h
exact monotone_eapprox f h
_ = ⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ := by
congr; ext n; rw [(eapprox f n).lintegral_eq_lintegral]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_supr_eapprox_lintegral MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral
theorem exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞}
(hε : ε ≠ 0) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ s, μ s < δ → ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ < ε := by
rcases exists_between (pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr hε) with ⟨ε₂, hε₂0, hε₂ε⟩
rcases exists_between hε₂0 with ⟨ε₁, hε₁0, hε₁₂⟩
rcases exists_simpleFunc_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos h hε₁0.ne' with ⟨φ, _, hφ⟩
rcases φ.exists_forall_le with ⟨C, hC⟩
use (ε₂ - ε₁) / C, ENNReal.div_pos_iff.2 ⟨(tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hε₁₂).ne', ENNReal.coe_ne_top⟩
refine fun s hs => lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ hε₂ε
simp only [lintegral_eq_nnreal, iSup_le_iff]
intro ψ hψ
calc
(map (↑) ψ).lintegral (μ.restrict s) ≤
(map (↑) φ).lintegral (μ.restrict s) + (map (↑) (ψ - φ)).lintegral (μ.restrict s) := by
rw [← SimpleFunc.add_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.map_add @ENNReal.coe_add]
refine SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono (fun x => ?_) le_rfl
simp only [add_tsub_eq_max, le_max_right, coe_map, Function.comp_apply, SimpleFunc.coe_add,
SimpleFunc.coe_sub, Pi.add_apply, Pi.sub_apply, ENNReal.coe_max (φ x) (ψ x)]
_ ≤ (map (↑) φ).lintegral (μ.restrict s) + ε₁ := by
gcongr
refine le_trans ?_ (hφ _ hψ).le
exact SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono le_rfl Measure.restrict_le_self
_ ≤ (SimpleFunc.const α (C : ℝ≥0∞)).lintegral (μ.restrict s) + ε₁ := by
gcongr
exact SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono (fun x ↦ ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (hC x)) le_rfl
_ = C * μ s + ε₁ := by
simp only [← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral, coe_const, lintegral_const,
Measure.restrict_apply, MeasurableSet.univ, univ_inter, Function.const]
_ ≤ C * ((ε₂ - ε₁) / C) + ε₁ := by gcongr
_ ≤ ε₂ - ε₁ + ε₁ := by gcongr; apply mul_div_le
_ = ε₂ := tsub_add_cancel_of_le hε₁₂.le
#align measure_theory.exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt MeasureTheory.exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt
theorem tendsto_set_lintegral_zero {ι} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) {l : Filter ι}
{s : ι → Set α} (hl : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫⁻ x in s i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 0) := by
simp only [ENNReal.nhds_zero, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal, mem_Iio,
← pos_iff_ne_zero] at hl ⊢
intro ε ε0
rcases exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt h ε0.ne' with ⟨δ, δ0, hδ⟩
exact (hl δ δ0).mono fun i => hδ _
#align measure_theory.tendsto_set_lintegral_zero MeasureTheory.tendsto_set_lintegral_zero
theorem le_lintegral_add (f g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ := by
simp only [lintegral]
refine ENNReal.biSup_add_biSup_le' (p := fun h : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞ => h ≤ f)
(q := fun h : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞ => h ≤ g) ⟨0, zero_le f⟩ ⟨0, zero_le g⟩ fun f' hf' g' hg' => ?_
exact le_iSup₂_of_le (f' + g') (add_le_add hf' hg') (add_lintegral _ _).ge
#align measure_theory.le_lintegral_add MeasureTheory.le_lintegral_add
-- Use stronger lemmas `lintegral_add_left`/`lintegral_add_right` instead
theorem lintegral_add_aux {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
calc
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ =
∫⁻ a, (⨆ n, (eapprox f n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a) + ⨆ n, (eapprox g n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
simp only [iSup_eapprox_apply, hf, hg]
_ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, (eapprox f n + eapprox g n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
congr; funext a
rw [ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone]
· simp only [Pi.add_apply]
· intro i j h
exact monotone_eapprox _ h a
· intro i j h
exact monotone_eapprox _ h a
_ = ⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ + (eapprox g n).lintegral μ := by
rw [lintegral_iSup]
· congr
funext n
rw [← SimpleFunc.add_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral]
simp only [Pi.add_apply, SimpleFunc.coe_add]
· measurability
· intro i j h a
dsimp
gcongr <;> exact monotone_eapprox _ h _
_ = (⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ) + ⨆ n, (eapprox g n).lintegral μ := by
refine (ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone ?_ ?_).symm <;>
· intro i j h
exact SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono (monotone_eapprox _ h) le_rfl
_ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral hf, lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral hg]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_aux MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_aux
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_add_left {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_lintegral_add _ _)
rcases exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq μ fun a => f a + g a with ⟨φ, hφm, hφ_le, hφ_eq⟩
calc
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, φ a ∂μ := hφ_eq
_ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a + (φ a - f a) ∂μ := lintegral_mono fun a => le_add_tsub
_ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, φ a - f a ∂μ := lintegral_add_aux hf (hφm.sub hf)
_ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
add_le_add_left (lintegral_mono fun a => tsub_le_iff_left.2 <| hφ_le a) _
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_left MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_left
theorem lintegral_add_left' {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk, ← lintegral_add_left hf.measurable_mk,
lintegral_congr_ae (hf.ae_eq_mk.add (ae_eq_refl g))]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_left' MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_left'
theorem lintegral_add_right' (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
simpa only [add_comm] using lintegral_add_left' hg f
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_right' MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_right'
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_add_right (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : Measurable g) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_add_right' f hg.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_right MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_right
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_smul_measure (c : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂c • μ = c * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
simp only [lintegral, iSup_subtype', SimpleFunc.lintegral_smul, ENNReal.mul_iSup, smul_eq_mul]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_smul_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_smul_measure
lemma set_lintegral_smul_measure (c : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂(c • μ) = c * ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
rw [Measure.restrict_smul, lintegral_smul_measure]
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_sum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} {ι} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂Measure.sum μ = ∑' i, ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ i := by
simp only [lintegral, iSup_subtype', SimpleFunc.lintegral_sum, ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
rw [iSup_comm]
congr; funext s
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with i s hi hs
· simp
simp only [Finset.sum_insert hi, ← hs]
refine (ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup ?_).symm
intro φ ψ
exact
⟨⟨φ ⊔ ψ, fun x => sup_le (φ.2 x) (ψ.2 x)⟩,
add_le_add (SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono le_sup_left le_rfl)
(Finset.sum_le_sum fun j _ => SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono le_sup_right le_rfl)⟩
#align measure_theory.lintegral_sum_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_sum_measure
theorem hasSum_lintegral_measure {ι} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
HasSum (fun i => ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ i) (∫⁻ a, f a ∂Measure.sum μ) :=
(lintegral_sum_measure f μ).symm ▸ ENNReal.summable.hasSum
#align measure_theory.has_sum_lintegral_measure MeasureTheory.hasSum_lintegral_measure
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_add_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (μ ν : Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂(μ + ν) = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, f a ∂ν := by
simpa [tsum_fintype] using lintegral_sum_measure f fun b => cond b μ ν
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_measure
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_finset_sum_measure {ι} {m : MeasurableSpace α} (s : Finset ι) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞)
(μ : ι → Measure α) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂(∑ i ∈ s, μ i) = ∑ i ∈ s, ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ i := by
rw [← Measure.sum_coe_finset, lintegral_sum_measure, ← Finset.tsum_subtype']
simp only [Finset.coe_sort_coe]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_finset_sum_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_finset_sum_measure
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_zero_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂(0 : Measure α) = 0 := by
simp [lintegral]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_zero_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_zero_measure
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_of_isEmpty {α} [MeasurableSpace α] [IsEmpty α] (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = 0 := by
have : Subsingleton (Measure α) := inferInstance
convert lintegral_zero_measure f
theorem set_lintegral_empty (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ x in ∅, f x ∂μ = 0 := by
rw [Measure.restrict_empty, lintegral_zero_measure]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_empty MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_empty
theorem set_lintegral_univ (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ x in univ, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by
rw [Measure.restrict_univ]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_univ MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_univ
theorem set_lintegral_measure_zero (s : Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hs' : μ s = 0) :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0 := by
convert lintegral_zero_measure _
exact Measure.restrict_eq_zero.2 hs'
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_measure_zero MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_measure_zero
theorem lintegral_finset_sum' (s : Finset β) {f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ b ∈ s, AEMeasurable (f b) μ) :
∫⁻ a, ∑ b ∈ s, f b a ∂μ = ∑ b ∈ s, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ := by
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with a s has ih
· simp
· simp only [Finset.sum_insert has]
rw [Finset.forall_mem_insert] at hf
rw [lintegral_add_left' hf.1, ih hf.2]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_finset_sum' MeasureTheory.lintegral_finset_sum'
theorem lintegral_finset_sum (s : Finset β) {f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ b ∈ s, Measurable (f b)) :
∫⁻ a, ∑ b ∈ s, f b a ∂μ = ∑ b ∈ s, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ :=
lintegral_finset_sum' s fun b hb => (hf b hb).aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_finset_sum MeasureTheory.lintegral_finset_sum
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_const_mul (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ :=
calc
∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, (const α r * eapprox f n) a ∂μ := by
congr
funext a
rw [← iSup_eapprox_apply f hf, ENNReal.mul_iSup]
simp
_ = ⨆ n, r * (eapprox f n).lintegral μ := by
rw [lintegral_iSup]
· congr
funext n
rw [← SimpleFunc.const_mul_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral]
· intro n
exact SimpleFunc.measurable _
· intro i j h a
exact mul_le_mul_left' (monotone_eapprox _ h _) _
_ = r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by rw [← ENNReal.mul_iSup, lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral hf]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_mul MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_mul
theorem lintegral_const_mul'' (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
have A : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, hf.mk f a ∂μ := lintegral_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk
have B : ∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, r * hf.mk f a ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae (EventuallyEq.fun_comp hf.ae_eq_mk _)
rw [A, B, lintegral_const_mul _ hf.measurable_mk]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_mul'' MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_mul''
theorem lintegral_const_mul_le (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral, ENNReal.mul_iSup]
refine iSup_le fun s => ?_
rw [ENNReal.mul_iSup, iSup_le_iff]
intro hs
rw [← SimpleFunc.const_mul_lintegral, lintegral]
refine le_iSup_of_le (const α r * s) (le_iSup_of_le (fun x => ?_) le_rfl)
exact mul_le_mul_left' (hs x) _
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_mul_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_mul_le
theorem lintegral_const_mul' (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hr : r ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
by_cases h : r = 0
· simp [h]
apply le_antisymm _ (lintegral_const_mul_le r f)
have rinv : r * r⁻¹ = 1 := ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel h hr
have rinv' : r⁻¹ * r = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact rinv
have := lintegral_const_mul_le (μ := μ) r⁻¹ fun x => r * f x
simp? [(mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, rinv'] at this says
simp only [(mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, rinv', one_mul] at this
simpa [(mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, rinv] using mul_le_mul_left' this r
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_mul' MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_mul'
theorem lintegral_mul_const (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ a, f a * r ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) * r := by simp_rw [mul_comm, lintegral_const_mul r hf]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mul_const MeasureTheory.lintegral_mul_const
theorem lintegral_mul_const'' (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
∫⁻ a, f a * r ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) * r := by simp_rw [mul_comm, lintegral_const_mul'' r hf]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mul_const'' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mul_const''
theorem lintegral_mul_const_le (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
(∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) * r ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a * r ∂μ := by
simp_rw [mul_comm, lintegral_const_mul_le r f]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mul_const_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_mul_const_le
theorem lintegral_mul_const' (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hr : r ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a * r ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) * r := by simp_rw [mul_comm, lintegral_const_mul' r f hr]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mul_const' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mul_const'
theorem lintegral_lintegral_mul {β} [MeasurableSpace β] {ν : Measure β} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
{g : β → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g ν) :
∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, f x * g y ∂ν ∂μ = (∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) * ∫⁻ y, g y ∂ν := by
simp [lintegral_const_mul'' _ hg, lintegral_mul_const'' _ hf]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_lintegral_mul MeasureTheory.lintegral_lintegral_mul
-- TODO: Need a better way of rewriting inside of an integral
theorem lintegral_rw₁ {f f' : α → β} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] f') (g : β → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, g (f a) ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g (f' a) ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae <| h.mono fun a h => by dsimp only; rw [h]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_rw₁ MeasureTheory.lintegral_rw₁
-- TODO: Need a better way of rewriting inside of an integral
theorem lintegral_rw₂ {f₁ f₁' : α → β} {f₂ f₂' : α → γ} (h₁ : f₁ =ᵐ[μ] f₁') (h₂ : f₂ =ᵐ[μ] f₂')
(g : β → γ → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ a, g (f₁ a) (f₂ a) ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g (f₁' a) (f₂' a) ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae <| h₁.mp <| h₂.mono fun _ h₂ h₁ => by dsimp only; rw [h₁, h₂]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_rw₂ MeasureTheory.lintegral_rw₂
theorem lintegral_indicator_le (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
simp only [lintegral]
apply iSup_le (fun g ↦ (iSup_le (fun hg ↦ ?_)))
have : g ≤ f := hg.trans (indicator_le_self s f)
refine le_iSup_of_le g (le_iSup_of_le this (le_of_eq ?_))
rw [lintegral_restrict, SimpleFunc.lintegral]
congr with t
by_cases H : t = 0
· simp [H]
congr with x
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_singleton_iff, mem_inter_iff, iff_self_and]
rintro rfl
contrapose! H
simpa [H] using hg x
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_indicator (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
apply le_antisymm (lintegral_indicator_le f s)
simp only [lintegral, ← restrict_lintegral_eq_lintegral_restrict _ hs, iSup_subtype']
refine iSup_mono' (Subtype.forall.2 fun φ hφ => ?_)
refine ⟨⟨φ.restrict s, fun x => ?_⟩, le_rfl⟩
simp [hφ x, hs, indicator_le_indicator]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_indicator MeasureTheory.lintegral_indicator
theorem lintegral_indicator₀ (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
rw [← lintegral_congr_ae (indicator_ae_eq_of_ae_eq_set hs.toMeasurable_ae_eq),
lintegral_indicator _ (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _),
Measure.restrict_congr_set hs.toMeasurable_ae_eq]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_indicator₀ MeasureTheory.lintegral_indicator₀
theorem lintegral_indicator_const_le (s : Set α) (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator (fun _ => c) a ∂μ ≤ c * μ s :=
(lintegral_indicator_le _ _).trans (set_lintegral_const s c).le
theorem lintegral_indicator_const₀ {s : Set α} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator (fun _ => c) a ∂μ = c * μ s := by
rw [lintegral_indicator₀ _ hs, set_lintegral_const]
theorem lintegral_indicator_const {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator (fun _ => c) a ∂μ = c * μ s :=
lintegral_indicator_const₀ hs.nullMeasurableSet c
#align measure_theory.lintegral_indicator_const MeasureTheory.lintegral_indicator_const
theorem set_lintegral_eq_const {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ x in { x | f x = r }, f x ∂μ = r * μ { x | f x = r } := by
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ { x | f x = r } → f x = r := ae_of_all μ fun _ hx => hx
rw [set_lintegral_congr_fun _ this]
· rw [lintegral_const, Measure.restrict_apply MeasurableSet.univ, Set.univ_inter]
· exact hf (measurableSet_singleton r)
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_eq_const MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_eq_const
theorem lintegral_indicator_one_le (s : Set α) : ∫⁻ a, s.indicator 1 a ∂μ ≤ μ s :=
(lintegral_indicator_const_le _ _).trans <| (one_mul _).le
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_indicator_one₀ (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) : ∫⁻ a, s.indicator 1 a ∂μ = μ s :=
(lintegral_indicator_const₀ hs _).trans <| one_mul _
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_indicator_one (hs : MeasurableSet s) : ∫⁻ a, s.indicator 1 a ∂μ = μ s :=
(lintegral_indicator_const hs _).trans <| one_mul _
#align measure_theory.lintegral_indicator_one MeasureTheory.lintegral_indicator_one
theorem lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hle : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g)
(hg : AEMeasurable g μ) (ε : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ε * μ { x | f x + ε ≤ g x } ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rcases exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq μ f with ⟨φ, hφm, hφ_le, hφ_eq⟩
calc
∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ + ε * μ { x | f x + ε ≤ g x } = ∫⁻ x, φ x ∂μ + ε * μ { x | f x + ε ≤ g x } := by
rw [hφ_eq]
_ ≤ ∫⁻ x, φ x ∂μ + ε * μ { x | φ x + ε ≤ g x } := by
gcongr
exact fun x => (add_le_add_right (hφ_le _) _).trans
_ = ∫⁻ x, φ x + indicator { x | φ x + ε ≤ g x } (fun _ => ε) x ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_add_left hφm, lintegral_indicator₀, set_lintegral_const]
exact measurableSet_le (hφm.nullMeasurable.measurable'.add_const _) hg.nullMeasurable
_ ≤ ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ := lintegral_mono_ae (hle.mono fun x hx₁ => ?_)
simp only [indicator_apply]; split_ifs with hx₂
exacts [hx₂, (add_zero _).trans_le <| (hφ_le x).trans hx₁]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral
theorem mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (ε : ℝ≥0∞) :
ε * μ { x | ε ≤ f x } ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
simpa only [lintegral_zero, zero_add] using
lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral (ae_of_all _ fun x => zero_le (f x)) hf ε
#align measure_theory.mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ MeasureTheory.mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀
theorem mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (ε : ℝ≥0∞) :
ε * μ { x | ε ≤ f x } ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ :=
mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ hf.aemeasurable ε
#align measure_theory.mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral MeasureTheory.mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral
lemma meas_le_lintegral₀ {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ)
{s : Set α} (hs : ∀ x ∈ s, 1 ≤ f x) : μ s ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
apply le_trans _ (mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ hf 1)
rw [one_mul]
exact measure_mono hs
lemma lintegral_le_meas {s : Set α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ a, f a ≤ 1) (h'f : ∀ a ∈ sᶜ, f a = 0) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ μ s := by
apply (lintegral_mono (fun x ↦ ?_)).trans (lintegral_indicator_one_le s)
by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· simpa [hx] using hf x
· simpa [hx] using h'f x hx
theorem lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ)
(hμf : μ {x | f x = ∞} ≠ 0) : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∞ :=
eq_top_iff.mpr <|
calc
∞ = ∞ * μ { x | ∞ ≤ f x } := by simp [mul_eq_top, hμf]
_ ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ hf ∞
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero
theorem setLintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero (hf : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s))
(hμf : μ ({x ∈ s | f x = ∞}) ≠ 0) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∞ :=
lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero hf <|
mt (eq_bot_mono <| by rw [← setOf_inter_eq_sep]; exact Measure.le_restrict_apply _ _) hμf
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero MeasureTheory.setLintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero
theorem measure_eq_top_of_lintegral_ne_top (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hμf : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
μ {x | f x = ∞} = 0 :=
of_not_not fun h => hμf <| lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero hf h
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_top_of_lintegral_ne_top MeasureTheory.measure_eq_top_of_lintegral_ne_top
theorem measure_eq_top_of_setLintegral_ne_top (hf : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s))
(hμf : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) : μ ({x ∈ s | f x = ∞}) = 0 :=
of_not_not fun h => hμf <| setLintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero hf h
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_top_of_set_lintegral_ne_top MeasureTheory.measure_eq_top_of_setLintegral_ne_top
theorem meas_ge_le_lintegral_div {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0)
(hε' : ε ≠ ∞) : μ { x | ε ≤ f x } ≤ (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) / ε :=
(ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le (Or.inl hε) (Or.inl hε')).2 <| by
rw [mul_comm]
exact mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ hf ε
#align measure_theory.meas_ge_le_lintegral_div MeasureTheory.meas_ge_le_lintegral_div
theorem ae_eq_of_ae_le_of_lintegral_le {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) (hf : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞)
(hg : AEMeasurable g μ) (hgf : ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) : f =ᵐ[μ] g := by
have : ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, g x < f x + (n : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ := by
intro n
simp only [ae_iff, not_lt]
have : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ + (↑n)⁻¹ * μ { x : α | f x + (n : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ ≤ g x } ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ :=
(lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral hfg hg n⁻¹).trans hgf
rw [(ENNReal.cancel_of_ne hf).add_le_iff_nonpos_right, nonpos_iff_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero] at this
exact this.resolve_left (ENNReal.inv_ne_zero.2 (ENNReal.natCast_ne_top _))
refine hfg.mp ((ae_all_iff.2 this).mono fun x hlt hle => hle.antisymm ?_)
suffices Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => f x + (n : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) from
ge_of_tendsto' this fun i => (hlt i).le
simpa only [inv_top, add_zero] using
tendsto_const_nhds.add (ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 ENNReal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top)
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_of_ae_le_of_lintegral_le MeasureTheory.ae_eq_of_ae_le_of_lintegral_le
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_eq_zero_iff' {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
have : ∫⁻ _ : α, 0 ∂μ ≠ ∞ := by simp [lintegral_zero, zero_ne_top]
⟨fun h =>
(ae_eq_of_ae_le_of_lintegral_le (ae_of_all _ <| zero_le f) this hf
(h.trans lintegral_zero.symm).le).symm,
fun h => (lintegral_congr_ae h).trans lintegral_zero⟩
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_zero_iff' MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_zero_iff'
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_eq_zero_iff {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
lintegral_eq_zero_iff' hf.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_zero_iff MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_zero_iff
theorem lintegral_pos_iff_support {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
(0 < ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) ↔ 0 < μ (Function.support f) := by
simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, hf, Filter.EventuallyEq, ae_iff, Function.support]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_pos_iff_support MeasureTheory.lintegral_pos_iff_support
theorem setLintegral_pos_iff {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set α} :
0 < ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ ↔ 0 < μ (Function.support f ∩ s) := by
rw [lintegral_pos_iff_support hf, Measure.restrict_apply (measurableSet_support hf)]
theorem lintegral_iSup_ae {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ n, Measurable (f n))
(h_mono : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, f n a ≤ f n.succ a) : ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := exists_measurable_superset_of_null (ae_iff.1 (ae_all_iff.2 h_mono))
let g n a := if a ∈ s then 0 else f n a
have g_eq_f : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ n, g n a = f n a :=
(measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem.1 hs.2.2).mono fun a ha n => if_neg ha
calc
∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f n a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, g n a ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae <| g_eq_f.mono fun a ha => by simp only [ha]
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, g n a ∂μ :=
(lintegral_iSup (fun n => measurable_const.piecewise hs.2.1 (hf n))
(monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun n a => ?_))
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by simp only [lintegral_congr_ae (g_eq_f.mono fun _a ha => ha _)]
simp only [g]
split_ifs with h
· rfl
· have := Set.not_mem_subset hs.1 h
simp only [not_forall, not_le, mem_setOf_eq, not_exists, not_lt] at this
exact this n
#align measure_theory.lintegral_supr_ae MeasureTheory.lintegral_iSup_ae
theorem lintegral_sub' {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) (hg_fin : ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ ≠ ∞)
(h_le : g ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : ∫⁻ a, f a - g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ - ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
refine ENNReal.eq_sub_of_add_eq hg_fin ?_
rw [← lintegral_add_right' _ hg]
exact lintegral_congr_ae (h_le.mono fun x hx => tsub_add_cancel_of_le hx)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_sub' MeasureTheory.lintegral_sub'
theorem lintegral_sub {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : Measurable g) (hg_fin : ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ ≠ ∞)
(h_le : g ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : ∫⁻ a, f a - g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ - ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_sub' hg.aemeasurable hg_fin h_le
#align measure_theory.lintegral_sub MeasureTheory.lintegral_sub
theorem lintegral_sub_le' (f g : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ - ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, g x - f x ∂μ := by
rw [tsub_le_iff_right]
by_cases hfi : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∞
· rw [hfi, add_top]
exact le_top
· rw [← lintegral_add_right' _ hf]
gcongr
exact le_tsub_add
#align measure_theory.lintegral_sub_le' MeasureTheory.lintegral_sub_le'
theorem lintegral_sub_le (f g : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ - ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, g x - f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_sub_le' f g hf.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_sub_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_sub_le
theorem lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_frequently_ae_lt {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g μ)
(hfi : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_le : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) (h : ∃ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ≠ g x) :
∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ < ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ := by
contrapose! h
simp only [not_frequently, Ne, Classical.not_not]
exact ae_eq_of_ae_le_of_lintegral_le h_le hfi hg h
#align measure_theory.lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_frequently_ae_lt MeasureTheory.lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_frequently_ae_lt
theorem lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_ae_lt_on {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g μ)
(hfi : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_le : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) {s : Set α} (hμs : μ s ≠ 0)
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x < g x) : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ < ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ :=
lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_frequently_ae_lt hg hfi h_le <|
((frequently_ae_mem_iff.2 hμs).and_eventually h).mono fun _x hx => (hx.2 hx.1).ne
#align measure_theory.lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_ae_lt_on MeasureTheory.lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_ae_lt_on
theorem lintegral_strict_mono {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ)
(hfi : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x < g x) : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ < ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ := by
rw [Ne, ← Measure.measure_univ_eq_zero] at hμ
refine lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_ae_lt_on hg hfi (ae_le_of_ae_lt h) hμ ?_
simpa using h
#align measure_theory.lintegral_strict_mono MeasureTheory.lintegral_strict_mono
theorem set_lintegral_strict_mono {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α} (hsm : MeasurableSet s)
(hs : μ s ≠ 0) (hg : Measurable g) (hfi : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞)
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x < g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ < ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
lintegral_strict_mono (by simp [hs]) hg.aemeasurable hfi ((ae_restrict_iff' hsm).mpr h)
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_strict_mono MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_strict_mono
theorem lintegral_iInf_ae {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h_meas : ∀ n, Measurable (f n))
(h_mono : ∀ n : ℕ, f n.succ ≤ᵐ[μ] f n) (h_fin : ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ :=
have fn_le_f0 : ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono fun a => iInf_le_of_le 0 le_rfl
have fn_le_f0' : ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ := iInf_le_of_le 0 le_rfl
(ENNReal.sub_right_inj h_fin fn_le_f0 fn_le_f0').1 <|
show ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ - ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ - ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ from
calc
∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ - ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f 0 a - ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ :=
(lintegral_sub (measurable_iInf h_meas)
(ne_top_of_le_ne_top h_fin <| lintegral_mono fun a => iInf_le _ _)
(ae_of_all _ fun a => iInf_le _ _)).symm
_ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f 0 a - f n a ∂μ := congr rfl (funext fun a => ENNReal.sub_iInf)
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f 0 a - f n a ∂μ :=
(lintegral_iSup_ae (fun n => (h_meas 0).sub (h_meas n)) fun n =>
(h_mono n).mono fun a ha => tsub_le_tsub le_rfl ha)
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ - ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ :=
(have h_mono : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ n : ℕ, f n.succ a ≤ f n a := ae_all_iff.2 h_mono
have h_mono : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, f n a ≤ f 0 a := fun n =>
h_mono.mono fun a h => by
induction' n with n ih
· exact le_rfl
· exact le_trans (h n) ih
congr_arg iSup <|
funext fun n =>
lintegral_sub (h_meas _) (ne_top_of_le_ne_top h_fin <| lintegral_mono_ae <| h_mono n)
(h_mono n))
_ = ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ - ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := ENNReal.sub_iInf.symm
#align measure_theory.lintegral_infi_ae MeasureTheory.lintegral_iInf_ae
theorem lintegral_iInf {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h_meas : ∀ n, Measurable (f n)) (h_anti : Antitone f)
(h_fin : ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ ≠ ∞) : ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ :=
lintegral_iInf_ae h_meas (fun n => ae_of_all _ <| h_anti n.le_succ) h_fin
#align measure_theory.lintegral_infi MeasureTheory.lintegral_iInf
theorem lintegral_iInf' {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h_meas : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ)
(h_anti : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Antitone (fun i ↦ f i a)) (h_fin : ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← iInf_apply]
let p : α → (ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) → Prop := fun _ f' => Antitone f'
have hp : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x fun i => f i x := h_anti
have h_ae_seq_mono : Antitone (aeSeq h_meas p) := by
intro n m hnm x
by_cases hx : x ∈ aeSeqSet h_meas p
· exact aeSeq.prop_of_mem_aeSeqSet h_meas hx hnm
· simp only [aeSeq, hx, if_false]
exact le_rfl
rw [lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.iInf h_meas hp).symm]
simp_rw [iInf_apply]
rw [lintegral_iInf (aeSeq.measurable h_meas p) h_ae_seq_mono]
· congr
exact funext fun n ↦ lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.aeSeq_n_eq_fun_n_ae h_meas hp n)
· rwa [lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.aeSeq_n_eq_fun_n_ae h_meas hp 0)]
theorem lintegral_iInf_directed_of_measurable {mα : MeasurableSpace α} [Countable β]
{f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞} {μ : Measure α} (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (hf : ∀ b, Measurable (f b))
(hf_int : ∀ b, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_directed : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ b, f b a ∂μ = ⨅ b, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ := by
cases nonempty_encodable β
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty β
· simp only [iInf_of_empty, lintegral_const,
ENNReal.top_mul (Measure.measure_univ_ne_zero.mpr hμ)]
inhabit β
have : ∀ a, ⨅ b, f b a = ⨅ n, f (h_directed.sequence f n) a := by
refine fun a =>
le_antisymm (le_iInf fun n => iInf_le _ _)
(le_iInf fun b => iInf_le_of_le (Encodable.encode b + 1) ?_)
exact h_directed.sequence_le b a
-- Porting note: used `∘` below to deal with its reduced reducibility
calc
∫⁻ a, ⨅ b, f b a ∂μ
_ = ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, (f ∘ h_directed.sequence f) n a ∂μ := by simp only [this, Function.comp_apply]
_ = ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, (f ∘ h_directed.sequence f) n a ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_iInf ?_ h_directed.sequence_anti]
· exact hf_int _
· exact fun n => hf _
_ = ⨅ b, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ := by
refine le_antisymm (le_iInf fun b => ?_) (le_iInf fun n => ?_)
· exact iInf_le_of_le (Encodable.encode b + 1) (lintegral_mono <| h_directed.sequence_le b)
· exact iInf_le (fun b => ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ) _
#align lintegral_infi_directed_of_measurable MeasureTheory.lintegral_iInf_directed_of_measurable
theorem lintegral_liminf_le' {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h_meas : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ) :
∫⁻ a, liminf (fun n => f n a) atTop ∂μ ≤ liminf (fun n => ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ) atTop :=
calc
∫⁻ a, liminf (fun n => f n a) atTop ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n : ℕ, ⨅ i ≥ n, f i a ∂μ := by
simp only [liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat]
_ = ⨆ n : ℕ, ∫⁻ a, ⨅ i ≥ n, f i a ∂μ :=
(lintegral_iSup' (fun n => aemeasurable_biInf _ (to_countable _) (fun i _ ↦ h_meas i))
(ae_of_all μ fun a n m hnm => iInf_le_iInf_of_subset fun i hi => le_trans hnm hi))
_ ≤ ⨆ n : ℕ, ⨅ i ≥ n, ∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ := iSup_mono fun n => le_iInf₂_lintegral _
_ = atTop.liminf fun n => ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := Filter.liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat.symm
#align measure_theory.lintegral_liminf_le' MeasureTheory.lintegral_liminf_le'
theorem lintegral_liminf_le {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h_meas : ∀ n, Measurable (f n)) :
∫⁻ a, liminf (fun n => f n a) atTop ∂μ ≤ liminf (fun n => ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ) atTop :=
lintegral_liminf_le' fun n => (h_meas n).aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_liminf_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_liminf_le
theorem limsup_lintegral_le {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf_meas : ∀ n, Measurable (f n))
(h_bound : ∀ n, f n ≤ᵐ[μ] g) (h_fin : ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
limsup (fun n => ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ) atTop ≤ ∫⁻ a, limsup (fun n => f n a) atTop ∂μ :=
calc
limsup (fun n => ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ) atTop = ⨅ n : ℕ, ⨆ i ≥ n, ∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ :=
limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat
_ ≤ ⨅ n : ℕ, ∫⁻ a, ⨆ i ≥ n, f i a ∂μ := iInf_mono fun n => iSup₂_lintegral_le _
_ = ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n : ℕ, ⨆ i ≥ n, f i a ∂μ := by
refine (lintegral_iInf ?_ ?_ ?_).symm
· intro n
exact measurable_biSup _ (to_countable _) (fun i _ ↦ hf_meas i)
· intro n m hnm a
exact iSup_le_iSup_of_subset fun i hi => le_trans hnm hi
· refine ne_top_of_le_ne_top h_fin (lintegral_mono_ae ?_)
refine (ae_all_iff.2 h_bound).mono fun n hn => ?_
exact iSup_le fun i => iSup_le fun _ => hn i
_ = ∫⁻ a, limsup (fun n => f n a) atTop ∂μ := by simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat]
#align measure_theory.limsup_lintegral_le MeasureTheory.limsup_lintegral_le
theorem tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence {F : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(bound : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hF_meas : ∀ n, Measurable (F n)) (h_bound : ∀ n, F n ≤ᵐ[μ] bound)
(h_fin : ∫⁻ a, bound a ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => F n a) atTop (𝓝 (f a))) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ)) :=
tendsto_of_le_liminf_of_limsup_le
(calc
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, liminf (fun n : ℕ => F n a) atTop ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae <| h_lim.mono fun a h => h.liminf_eq.symm
_ ≤ liminf (fun n => ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ) atTop := lintegral_liminf_le hF_meas
)
(calc
limsup (fun n : ℕ => ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ) atTop ≤ ∫⁻ a, limsup (fun n => F n a) atTop ∂μ :=
limsup_lintegral_le hF_meas h_bound h_fin
_ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := lintegral_congr_ae <| h_lim.mono fun a h => h.limsup_eq
)
#align measure_theory.tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence MeasureTheory.tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence
theorem tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence' {F : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(bound : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hF_meas : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (F n) μ) (h_bound : ∀ n, F n ≤ᵐ[μ] bound)
(h_fin : ∫⁻ a, bound a ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => F n a) atTop (𝓝 (f a))) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ)) := by
have : ∀ n, ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, (hF_meas n).mk (F n) a ∂μ := fun n =>
lintegral_congr_ae (hF_meas n).ae_eq_mk
simp_rw [this]
apply
tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence bound (fun n => (hF_meas n).measurable_mk) _ h_fin
· have : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, (hF_meas n).mk (F n) a = F n a := fun n => (hF_meas n).ae_eq_mk.symm
have : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ n, (hF_meas n).mk (F n) a = F n a := ae_all_iff.mpr this
filter_upwards [this, h_lim] with a H H'
simp_rw [H]
exact H'
· intro n
filter_upwards [h_bound n, (hF_meas n).ae_eq_mk] with a H H'
rwa [H'] at H
#align measure_theory.tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence' MeasureTheory.tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence'
theorem tendsto_lintegral_filter_of_dominated_convergence {ι} {l : Filter ι}
[l.IsCountablyGenerated] {F : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (bound : α → ℝ≥0∞)
(hF_meas : ∀ᶠ n in l, Measurable (F n)) (h_bound : ∀ᶠ n in l, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, F n a ≤ bound a)
(h_fin : ∫⁻ a, bound a ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => F n a) l (𝓝 (f a))) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ) l (𝓝 <| ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) := by
rw [tendsto_iff_seq_tendsto]
intro x xl
have hxl := by
rw [tendsto_atTop'] at xl
exact xl
have h := inter_mem hF_meas h_bound
replace h := hxl _ h
rcases h with ⟨k, h⟩
rw [← tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat k]
refine tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact bound
· intro
refine (h _ ?_).1
exact Nat.le_add_left _ _
· intro
refine (h _ ?_).2
exact Nat.le_add_left _ _
· assumption
· refine h_lim.mono fun a h_lim => ?_
apply @Tendsto.comp _ _ _ (fun n => x (n + k)) fun n => F n a
· assumption
rw [tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat]
assumption
#align measure_theory.tendsto_lintegral_filter_of_dominated_convergence MeasureTheory.tendsto_lintegral_filter_of_dominated_convergence
theorem lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_antitone {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} {F : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ) (h_anti : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Antitone fun n ↦ f n x)
(h0 : ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ ≠ ∞)
(h_tendsto : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n ↦ f n x) atTop (𝓝 (F x))) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫⁻ x, F x ∂μ)) := by
have : Antitone fun n ↦ ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ := fun i j hij ↦
lintegral_mono_ae (h_anti.mono fun x hx ↦ hx hij)
suffices key : ∫⁻ x, F x ∂μ = ⨅ n, ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ by
rw [key]
exact tendsto_atTop_iInf this
rw [← lintegral_iInf' hf h_anti h0]
refine lintegral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [h_anti, h_tendsto] with _ hx_anti hx_tendsto
using tendsto_nhds_unique hx_tendsto (tendsto_atTop_iInf hx_anti)
section
open Encodable
theorem lintegral_iSup_directed_of_measurable [Countable β] {f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ b, Measurable (f b)) (h_directed : Directed (· ≤ ·) f) :
∫⁻ a, ⨆ b, f b a ∂μ = ⨆ b, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ := by
cases nonempty_encodable β
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty β
· simp [iSup_of_empty]
inhabit β
have : ∀ a, ⨆ b, f b a = ⨆ n, f (h_directed.sequence f n) a := by
intro a
refine le_antisymm (iSup_le fun b => ?_) (iSup_le fun n => le_iSup (fun n => f n a) _)
exact le_iSup_of_le (encode b + 1) (h_directed.le_sequence b a)
calc
∫⁻ a, ⨆ b, f b a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f (h_directed.sequence f n) a ∂μ := by simp only [this]
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f (h_directed.sequence f n) a ∂μ :=
(lintegral_iSup (fun n => hf _) h_directed.sequence_mono)
_ = ⨆ b, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ := by
refine le_antisymm (iSup_le fun n => ?_) (iSup_le fun b => ?_)
· exact le_iSup (fun b => ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ) _
· exact le_iSup_of_le (encode b + 1) (lintegral_mono <| h_directed.le_sequence b)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_supr_directed_of_measurable MeasureTheory.lintegral_iSup_directed_of_measurable
theorem lintegral_iSup_directed [Countable β] {f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ b, AEMeasurable (f b) μ)
(h_directed : Directed (· ≤ ·) f) : ∫⁻ a, ⨆ b, f b a ∂μ = ⨆ b, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← iSup_apply]
let p : α → (β → ENNReal) → Prop := fun x f' => Directed LE.le f'
have hp : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x fun i => f i x := by
filter_upwards [] with x i j
obtain ⟨z, hz₁, hz₂⟩ := h_directed i j
exact ⟨z, hz₁ x, hz₂ x⟩
have h_ae_seq_directed : Directed LE.le (aeSeq hf p) := by
intro b₁ b₂
obtain ⟨z, hz₁, hz₂⟩ := h_directed b₁ b₂
refine ⟨z, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
· intro x
by_cases hx : x ∈ aeSeqSet hf p
· repeat rw [aeSeq.aeSeq_eq_fun_of_mem_aeSeqSet hf hx]
apply_rules [hz₁, hz₂]
· simp only [aeSeq, hx, if_false]
exact le_rfl
convert lintegral_iSup_directed_of_measurable (aeSeq.measurable hf p) h_ae_seq_directed using 1
· simp_rw [← iSup_apply]
rw [lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.iSup hf hp).symm]
· congr 1
ext1 b
rw [lintegral_congr_ae]
apply EventuallyEq.symm
exact aeSeq.aeSeq_n_eq_fun_n_ae hf hp _
#align measure_theory.lintegral_supr_directed MeasureTheory.lintegral_iSup_directed
end
theorem lintegral_tsum [Countable β] {f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ i, AEMeasurable (f i) μ) :
∫⁻ a, ∑' i, f i a ∂μ = ∑' i, ∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ := by
simp only [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
rw [lintegral_iSup_directed]
· simp [lintegral_finset_sum' _ fun i _ => hf i]
· intro b
exact Finset.aemeasurable_sum _ fun i _ => hf i
· intro s t
use s ∪ t
constructor
· exact fun a => Finset.sum_le_sum_of_subset Finset.subset_union_left
· exact fun a => Finset.sum_le_sum_of_subset Finset.subset_union_right
#align measure_theory.lintegral_tsum MeasureTheory.lintegral_tsum
open Measure
theorem lintegral_iUnion₀ [Countable β] {s : β → Set α} (hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ)
(hd : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on s)) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a in ⋃ i, s i, f a ∂μ = ∑' i, ∫⁻ a in s i, f a ∂μ := by
simp only [Measure.restrict_iUnion_ae hd hm, lintegral_sum_measure]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_Union₀ MeasureTheory.lintegral_iUnion₀
theorem lintegral_iUnion [Countable β] {s : β → Set α} (hm : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i))
(hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on s)) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a in ⋃ i, s i, f a ∂μ = ∑' i, ∫⁻ a in s i, f a ∂μ :=
lintegral_iUnion₀ (fun i => (hm i).nullMeasurableSet) hd.aedisjoint f
#align measure_theory.lintegral_Union MeasureTheory.lintegral_iUnion
theorem lintegral_biUnion₀ {t : Set β} {s : β → Set α} (ht : t.Countable)
(hm : ∀ i ∈ t, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hd : t.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on s)) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a in ⋃ i ∈ t, s i, f a ∂μ = ∑' i : t, ∫⁻ a in s i, f a ∂μ := by
haveI := ht.toEncodable
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, lintegral_iUnion₀ (SetCoe.forall'.1 hm) (hd.subtype _ _)]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_bUnion₀ MeasureTheory.lintegral_biUnion₀
theorem lintegral_biUnion {t : Set β} {s : β → Set α} (ht : t.Countable)
(hm : ∀ i ∈ t, MeasurableSet (s i)) (hd : t.PairwiseDisjoint s) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a in ⋃ i ∈ t, s i, f a ∂μ = ∑' i : t, ∫⁻ a in s i, f a ∂μ :=
lintegral_biUnion₀ ht (fun i hi => (hm i hi).nullMeasurableSet) hd.aedisjoint f
#align measure_theory.lintegral_bUnion MeasureTheory.lintegral_biUnion
theorem lintegral_biUnion_finset₀ {s : Finset β} {t : β → Set α}
(hd : Set.Pairwise (↑s) (AEDisjoint μ on t)) (hm : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (t b) μ)
(f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ a in ⋃ b ∈ s, t b, f a ∂μ = ∑ b ∈ s, ∫⁻ a in t b, f a ∂μ := by
simp only [← Finset.mem_coe, lintegral_biUnion₀ s.countable_toSet hm hd, ← Finset.tsum_subtype']
#align measure_theory.lintegral_bUnion_finset₀ MeasureTheory.lintegral_biUnion_finset₀
theorem lintegral_biUnion_finset {s : Finset β} {t : β → Set α} (hd : Set.PairwiseDisjoint (↑s) t)
(hm : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (t b)) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a in ⋃ b ∈ s, t b, f a ∂μ = ∑ b ∈ s, ∫⁻ a in t b, f a ∂μ :=
lintegral_biUnion_finset₀ hd.aedisjoint (fun b hb => (hm b hb).nullMeasurableSet) f
#align measure_theory.lintegral_bUnion_finset MeasureTheory.lintegral_biUnion_finset
theorem lintegral_iUnion_le [Countable β] (s : β → Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a in ⋃ i, s i, f a ∂μ ≤ ∑' i, ∫⁻ a in s i, f a ∂μ := by
rw [← lintegral_sum_measure]
exact lintegral_mono' restrict_iUnion_le le_rfl
#align measure_theory.lintegral_Union_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_iUnion_le
theorem lintegral_union {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} {A B : Set α} (hB : MeasurableSet B) (hAB : Disjoint A B) :
∫⁻ a in A ∪ B, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a in A, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a in B, f a ∂μ := by
rw [restrict_union hAB hB, lintegral_add_measure]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_union MeasureTheory.lintegral_union
theorem lintegral_union_le (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s t : Set α) :
∫⁻ a in s ∪ t, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a in t, f a ∂μ := by
rw [← lintegral_add_measure]
exact lintegral_mono' (restrict_union_le _ _) le_rfl
theorem lintegral_inter_add_diff {B : Set α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (A : Set α) (hB : MeasurableSet B) :
∫⁻ x in A ∩ B, f x ∂μ + ∫⁻ x in A \ B, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x in A, f x ∂μ := by
rw [← lintegral_add_measure, restrict_inter_add_diff _ hB]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_inter_add_diff MeasureTheory.lintegral_inter_add_diff
theorem lintegral_add_compl (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {A : Set α} (hA : MeasurableSet A) :
∫⁻ x in A, f x ∂μ + ∫⁻ x in Aᶜ, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by
rw [← lintegral_add_measure, Measure.restrict_add_restrict_compl hA]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_compl MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_compl
theorem lintegral_max {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
∫⁻ x, max (f x) (g x) ∂μ =
∫⁻ x in { x | f x ≤ g x }, g x ∂μ + ∫⁻ x in { x | g x < f x }, f x ∂μ := by
have hm : MeasurableSet { x | f x ≤ g x } := measurableSet_le hf hg
rw [← lintegral_add_compl (fun x => max (f x) (g x)) hm]
simp only [← compl_setOf, ← not_le]
refine congr_arg₂ (· + ·) (set_lintegral_congr_fun hm ?_) (set_lintegral_congr_fun hm.compl ?_)
exacts [ae_of_all _ fun x => max_eq_right (a := f x) (b := g x),
ae_of_all _ fun x (hx : ¬ f x ≤ g x) => max_eq_left (not_le.1 hx).le]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_max MeasureTheory.lintegral_max
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Lebesgue.lean | 1,379 | 1,383 | theorem set_lintegral_max {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) (s : Set α) :
∫⁻ x in s, max (f x) (g x) ∂μ =
∫⁻ x in s ∩ { x | f x ≤ g x }, g x ∂μ + ∫⁻ x in s ∩ { x | g x < f x }, f x ∂μ := by |
rw [lintegral_max hf hg, restrict_restrict, restrict_restrict, inter_comm s, inter_comm s]
exacts [measurableSet_lt hg hf, measurableSet_le hf hg]
|
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Cofinite
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.CompleteLattice
#align_import order.liminf_limsup from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ffde2d8a6e689149e44fd95fa862c23a57f8c780"
set_option autoImplicit true
open Filter Set Function
variable {α β γ ι ι' : Type*}
namespace Filter
section Relation
def IsBounded (r : α → α → Prop) (f : Filter α) :=
∃ b, ∀ᶠ x in f, r x b
#align filter.is_bounded Filter.IsBounded
def IsBoundedUnder (r : α → α → Prop) (f : Filter β) (u : β → α) :=
(map u f).IsBounded r
#align filter.is_bounded_under Filter.IsBoundedUnder
variable {r : α → α → Prop} {f g : Filter α}
theorem isBounded_iff : f.IsBounded r ↔ ∃ s ∈ f.sets, ∃ b, s ⊆ { x | r x b } :=
Iff.intro (fun ⟨b, hb⟩ => ⟨{ a | r a b }, hb, b, Subset.refl _⟩) fun ⟨_, hs, b, hb⟩ =>
⟨b, mem_of_superset hs hb⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_iff Filter.isBounded_iff
theorem isBoundedUnder_of {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : (∃ b, ∀ x, r (u x) b) → f.IsBoundedUnder r u
| ⟨b, hb⟩ => ⟨b, show ∀ᶠ x in f, r (u x) b from eventually_of_forall hb⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_under_of Filter.isBoundedUnder_of
theorem isBounded_bot : IsBounded r ⊥ ↔ Nonempty α := by simp [IsBounded, exists_true_iff_nonempty]
#align filter.is_bounded_bot Filter.isBounded_bot
theorem isBounded_top : IsBounded r ⊤ ↔ ∃ t, ∀ x, r x t := by simp [IsBounded, eq_univ_iff_forall]
#align filter.is_bounded_top Filter.isBounded_top
theorem isBounded_principal (s : Set α) : IsBounded r (𝓟 s) ↔ ∃ t, ∀ x ∈ s, r x t := by
simp [IsBounded, subset_def]
#align filter.is_bounded_principal Filter.isBounded_principal
theorem isBounded_sup [IsTrans α r] [IsDirected α r] :
IsBounded r f → IsBounded r g → IsBounded r (f ⊔ g)
| ⟨b₁, h₁⟩, ⟨b₂, h₂⟩ =>
let ⟨b, rb₁b, rb₂b⟩ := directed_of r b₁ b₂
⟨b, eventually_sup.mpr
⟨h₁.mono fun _ h => _root_.trans h rb₁b, h₂.mono fun _ h => _root_.trans h rb₂b⟩⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_sup Filter.isBounded_sup
theorem IsBounded.mono (h : f ≤ g) : IsBounded r g → IsBounded r f
| ⟨b, hb⟩ => ⟨b, h hb⟩
#align filter.is_bounded.mono Filter.IsBounded.mono
theorem IsBoundedUnder.mono {f g : Filter β} {u : β → α} (h : f ≤ g) :
g.IsBoundedUnder r u → f.IsBoundedUnder r u := fun hg => IsBounded.mono (map_mono h) hg
#align filter.is_bounded_under.mono Filter.IsBoundedUnder.mono
theorem IsBoundedUnder.mono_le [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(hu : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l u) (hv : v ≤ᶠ[l] u) : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l v := by
apply hu.imp
exact fun b hb => (eventually_map.1 hb).mp <| hv.mono fun x => le_trans
#align filter.is_bounded_under.mono_le Filter.IsBoundedUnder.mono_le
theorem IsBoundedUnder.mono_ge [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(hu : IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l u) (hv : u ≤ᶠ[l] v) : IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l v :=
IsBoundedUnder.mono_le (β := βᵒᵈ) hu hv
#align filter.is_bounded_under.mono_ge Filter.IsBoundedUnder.mono_ge
theorem isBoundedUnder_const [IsRefl α r] {l : Filter β} {a : α} : IsBoundedUnder r l fun _ => a :=
⟨a, eventually_map.2 <| eventually_of_forall fun _ => refl _⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_under_const Filter.isBoundedUnder_const
theorem IsBounded.isBoundedUnder {q : β → β → Prop} {u : α → β}
(hu : ∀ a₀ a₁, r a₀ a₁ → q (u a₀) (u a₁)) : f.IsBounded r → f.IsBoundedUnder q u
| ⟨b, h⟩ => ⟨u b, show ∀ᶠ x in f, q (u x) (u b) from h.mono fun x => hu x b⟩
#align filter.is_bounded.is_bounded_under Filter.IsBounded.isBoundedUnder
theorem IsBoundedUnder.comp {l : Filter γ} {q : β → β → Prop} {u : γ → α} {v : α → β}
(hv : ∀ a₀ a₁, r a₀ a₁ → q (v a₀) (v a₁)) : l.IsBoundedUnder r u → l.IsBoundedUnder q (v ∘ u)
| ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨v a, show ∀ᶠ x in map u l, q (v x) (v a) from h.mono fun x => hv x a⟩
lemma _root_.BddAbove.isBoundedUnder [Preorder α] {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} :
BddAbove (Set.range u) → f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u
| ⟨b, hb⟩ => isBoundedUnder_of ⟨b, by simpa [mem_upperBounds] using hb⟩
lemma _root_.BddBelow.isBoundedUnder [Preorder α] {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} :
BddBelow (Set.range u) → f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u
| ⟨b, hb⟩ => isBoundedUnder_of ⟨b, by simpa [mem_lowerBounds] using hb⟩
theorem _root_.Monotone.isBoundedUnder_le_comp [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {l : Filter γ} {u : γ → α}
{v : α → β} (hv : Monotone v) (hl : l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u) :
l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) (v ∘ u) :=
hl.comp hv
theorem _root_.Monotone.isBoundedUnder_ge_comp [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {l : Filter γ} {u : γ → α}
{v : α → β} (hv : Monotone v) (hl : l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u) :
l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) (v ∘ u) :=
hl.comp (swap hv)
theorem _root_.Antitone.isBoundedUnder_le_comp [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {l : Filter γ} {u : γ → α}
{v : α → β} (hv : Antitone v) (hl : l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u) :
l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) (v ∘ u) :=
hl.comp (swap hv)
theorem _root_.Antitone.isBoundedUnder_ge_comp [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {l : Filter γ} {u : γ → α}
{v : α → β} (hv : Antitone v) (hl : l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u) :
l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) (v ∘ u) :=
hl.comp hv
theorem not_isBoundedUnder_of_tendsto_atTop [Preorder β] [NoMaxOrder β] {f : α → β} {l : Filter α}
[l.NeBot] (hf : Tendsto f l atTop) : ¬IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l f := by
rintro ⟨b, hb⟩
rw [eventually_map] at hb
obtain ⟨b', h⟩ := exists_gt b
have hb' := (tendsto_atTop.mp hf) b'
have : { x : α | f x ≤ b } ∩ { x : α | b' ≤ f x } = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun x hx => (not_le_of_lt h) (le_trans hx.2 hx.1)
exact (nonempty_of_mem (hb.and hb')).ne_empty this
#align filter.not_is_bounded_under_of_tendsto_at_top Filter.not_isBoundedUnder_of_tendsto_atTop
theorem not_isBoundedUnder_of_tendsto_atBot [Preorder β] [NoMinOrder β] {f : α → β} {l : Filter α}
[l.NeBot] (hf : Tendsto f l atBot) : ¬IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l f :=
not_isBoundedUnder_of_tendsto_atTop (β := βᵒᵈ) hf
#align filter.not_is_bounded_under_of_tendsto_at_bot Filter.not_isBoundedUnder_of_tendsto_atBot
theorem IsBoundedUnder.bddAbove_range_of_cofinite [Preorder β] [IsDirected β (· ≤ ·)] {f : α → β}
(hf : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) cofinite f) : BddAbove (range f) := by
rcases hf with ⟨b, hb⟩
haveI : Nonempty β := ⟨b⟩
rw [← image_univ, ← union_compl_self { x | f x ≤ b }, image_union, bddAbove_union]
exact ⟨⟨b, forall_mem_image.2 fun x => id⟩, (hb.image f).bddAbove⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_under.bdd_above_range_of_cofinite Filter.IsBoundedUnder.bddAbove_range_of_cofinite
theorem IsBoundedUnder.bddBelow_range_of_cofinite [Preorder β] [IsDirected β (· ≥ ·)] {f : α → β}
(hf : IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) cofinite f) : BddBelow (range f) :=
IsBoundedUnder.bddAbove_range_of_cofinite (β := βᵒᵈ) hf
#align filter.is_bounded_under.bdd_below_range_of_cofinite Filter.IsBoundedUnder.bddBelow_range_of_cofinite
theorem IsBoundedUnder.bddAbove_range [Preorder β] [IsDirected β (· ≤ ·)] {f : ℕ → β}
(hf : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) atTop f) : BddAbove (range f) := by
rw [← Nat.cofinite_eq_atTop] at hf
exact hf.bddAbove_range_of_cofinite
#align filter.is_bounded_under.bdd_above_range Filter.IsBoundedUnder.bddAbove_range
theorem IsBoundedUnder.bddBelow_range [Preorder β] [IsDirected β (· ≥ ·)] {f : ℕ → β}
(hf : IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) atTop f) : BddBelow (range f) :=
IsBoundedUnder.bddAbove_range (β := βᵒᵈ) hf
#align filter.is_bounded_under.bdd_below_range Filter.IsBoundedUnder.bddBelow_range
def IsCobounded (r : α → α → Prop) (f : Filter α) :=
∃ b, ∀ a, (∀ᶠ x in f, r x a) → r b a
#align filter.is_cobounded Filter.IsCobounded
def IsCoboundedUnder (r : α → α → Prop) (f : Filter β) (u : β → α) :=
(map u f).IsCobounded r
#align filter.is_cobounded_under Filter.IsCoboundedUnder
theorem IsCobounded.mk [IsTrans α r] (a : α) (h : ∀ s ∈ f, ∃ x ∈ s, r a x) : f.IsCobounded r :=
⟨a, fun _ s =>
let ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩ := h _ s
_root_.trans h₂ h₁⟩
#align filter.is_cobounded.mk Filter.IsCobounded.mk
theorem IsBounded.isCobounded_flip [IsTrans α r] [NeBot f] : f.IsBounded r → f.IsCobounded (flip r)
| ⟨a, ha⟩ =>
⟨a, fun b hb =>
let ⟨_, rxa, rbx⟩ := (ha.and hb).exists
show r b a from _root_.trans rbx rxa⟩
#align filter.is_bounded.is_cobounded_flip Filter.IsBounded.isCobounded_flip
theorem IsBounded.isCobounded_ge [Preorder α] [NeBot f] (h : f.IsBounded (· ≤ ·)) :
f.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) :=
h.isCobounded_flip
#align filter.is_bounded.is_cobounded_ge Filter.IsBounded.isCobounded_ge
theorem IsBounded.isCobounded_le [Preorder α] [NeBot f] (h : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·)) :
f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) :=
h.isCobounded_flip
#align filter.is_bounded.is_cobounded_le Filter.IsBounded.isCobounded_le
theorem IsBoundedUnder.isCoboundedUnder_flip {l : Filter γ} [IsTrans α r] [NeBot l]
(h : l.IsBoundedUnder r u) : l.IsCoboundedUnder (flip r) u :=
h.isCobounded_flip
theorem IsBoundedUnder.isCoboundedUnder_le {u : γ → α} {l : Filter γ} [Preorder α] [NeBot l]
(h : l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u) : l.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u :=
h.isCoboundedUnder_flip
theorem IsBoundedUnder.isCoboundedUnder_ge {u : γ → α} {l : Filter γ} [Preorder α] [NeBot l]
(h : l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u) : l.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u :=
h.isCoboundedUnder_flip
lemma isCoboundedUnder_le_of_eventually_le [Preorder α] (l : Filter ι) [NeBot l] {f : ι → α} {x : α}
(hf : ∀ᶠ i in l, x ≤ f i) :
IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l f :=
IsBoundedUnder.isCoboundedUnder_le ⟨x, hf⟩
lemma isCoboundedUnder_ge_of_eventually_le [Preorder α] (l : Filter ι) [NeBot l] {f : ι → α} {x : α}
(hf : ∀ᶠ i in l, f i ≤ x) :
IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l f :=
IsBoundedUnder.isCoboundedUnder_ge ⟨x, hf⟩
lemma isCoboundedUnder_le_of_le [Preorder α] (l : Filter ι) [NeBot l] {f : ι → α} {x : α}
(hf : ∀ i, x ≤ f i) :
IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l f :=
isCoboundedUnder_le_of_eventually_le l (eventually_of_forall hf)
lemma isCoboundedUnder_ge_of_le [Preorder α] (l : Filter ι) [NeBot l] {f : ι → α} {x : α}
(hf : ∀ i, f i ≤ x) :
IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l f :=
isCoboundedUnder_ge_of_eventually_le l (eventually_of_forall hf)
theorem isCobounded_bot : IsCobounded r ⊥ ↔ ∃ b, ∀ x, r b x := by simp [IsCobounded]
#align filter.is_cobounded_bot Filter.isCobounded_bot
theorem isCobounded_top : IsCobounded r ⊤ ↔ Nonempty α := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [IsCobounded, eq_univ_iff_forall,
exists_true_iff_nonempty]
#align filter.is_cobounded_top Filter.isCobounded_top
| Mathlib/Order/LiminfLimsup.lean | 287 | 288 | theorem isCobounded_principal (s : Set α) :
(𝓟 s).IsCobounded r ↔ ∃ b, ∀ a, (∀ x ∈ s, r x a) → r b a := by | simp [IsCobounded, subset_def]
|
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.PFun
#align_import order.filter.partial from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b363547b3113d350d053abdf2884e9850a56b205"
universe u v w
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
open Filter
def rmap (r : Rel α β) (l : Filter α) : Filter β where
sets := { s | r.core s ∈ l }
univ_sets := by simp
sets_of_superset hs st := mem_of_superset hs (Rel.core_mono _ st)
inter_sets hs ht := by
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq]
convert inter_mem hs ht
rw [← Rel.core_inter]
#align filter.rmap Filter.rmap
theorem rmap_sets (r : Rel α β) (l : Filter α) : (l.rmap r).sets = r.core ⁻¹' l.sets :=
rfl
#align filter.rmap_sets Filter.rmap_sets
@[simp]
theorem mem_rmap (r : Rel α β) (l : Filter α) (s : Set β) : s ∈ l.rmap r ↔ r.core s ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_rmap Filter.mem_rmap
@[simp]
theorem rmap_rmap (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) (l : Filter α) :
rmap s (rmap r l) = rmap (r.comp s) l :=
filter_eq <| by simp [rmap_sets, Set.preimage, Rel.core_comp]
#align filter.rmap_rmap Filter.rmap_rmap
@[simp]
theorem rmap_compose (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) : rmap s ∘ rmap r = rmap (r.comp s) :=
funext <| rmap_rmap _ _
#align filter.rmap_compose Filter.rmap_compose
def RTendsto (r : Rel α β) (l₁ : Filter α) (l₂ : Filter β) :=
l₁.rmap r ≤ l₂
#align filter.rtendsto Filter.RTendsto
theorem rtendsto_def (r : Rel α β) (l₁ : Filter α) (l₂ : Filter β) :
RTendsto r l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ s ∈ l₂, r.core s ∈ l₁ :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.rtendsto_def Filter.rtendsto_def
def rcomap (r : Rel α β) (f : Filter β) : Filter α where
sets := Rel.image (fun s t => r.core s ⊆ t) f.sets
univ_sets := ⟨Set.univ, univ_mem, Set.subset_univ _⟩
sets_of_superset := fun ⟨a', ha', ma'a⟩ ab => ⟨a', ha', ma'a.trans ab⟩
inter_sets := fun ⟨a', ha₁, ha₂⟩ ⟨b', hb₁, hb₂⟩ =>
⟨a' ∩ b', inter_mem ha₁ hb₁, (r.core_inter a' b').subset.trans (Set.inter_subset_inter ha₂ hb₂)⟩
#align filter.rcomap Filter.rcomap
theorem rcomap_sets (r : Rel α β) (f : Filter β) :
(rcomap r f).sets = Rel.image (fun s t => r.core s ⊆ t) f.sets :=
rfl
#align filter.rcomap_sets Filter.rcomap_sets
theorem rcomap_rcomap (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) (l : Filter γ) :
rcomap r (rcomap s l) = rcomap (r.comp s) l :=
filter_eq <| by
ext t; simp [rcomap_sets, Rel.image, Rel.core_comp]; constructor
· rintro ⟨u, ⟨v, vsets, hv⟩, h⟩
exact ⟨v, vsets, Set.Subset.trans (Rel.core_mono _ hv) h⟩
rintro ⟨t, tsets, ht⟩
exact ⟨Rel.core s t, ⟨t, tsets, Set.Subset.rfl⟩, ht⟩
#align filter.rcomap_rcomap Filter.rcomap_rcomap
@[simp]
theorem rcomap_compose (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) : rcomap r ∘ rcomap s = rcomap (r.comp s) :=
funext <| rcomap_rcomap _ _
#align filter.rcomap_compose Filter.rcomap_compose
theorem rtendsto_iff_le_rcomap (r : Rel α β) (l₁ : Filter α) (l₂ : Filter β) :
RTendsto r l₁ l₂ ↔ l₁ ≤ l₂.rcomap r := by
rw [rtendsto_def]
simp_rw [← l₂.mem_sets]
simp [Filter.le_def, rcomap, Rel.mem_image]; constructor
· exact fun h s t tl₂ => mem_of_superset (h t tl₂)
· exact fun h t tl₂ => h _ t tl₂ Set.Subset.rfl
#align filter.rtendsto_iff_le_rcomap Filter.rtendsto_iff_le_rcomap
-- Interestingly, there does not seem to be a way to express this relation using a forward map.
-- Given a filter `f` on `α`, we want a filter `f'` on `β` such that `r.preimage s ∈ f` if
-- and only if `s ∈ f'`. But the intersection of two sets satisfying the lhs may be empty.
def rcomap' (r : Rel α β) (f : Filter β) : Filter α where
sets := Rel.image (fun s t => r.preimage s ⊆ t) f.sets
univ_sets := ⟨Set.univ, univ_mem, Set.subset_univ _⟩
sets_of_superset := fun ⟨a', ha', ma'a⟩ ab => ⟨a', ha', ma'a.trans ab⟩
inter_sets := fun ⟨a', ha₁, ha₂⟩ ⟨b', hb₁, hb₂⟩ =>
⟨a' ∩ b', inter_mem ha₁ hb₁,
(@Rel.preimage_inter _ _ r _ _).trans (Set.inter_subset_inter ha₂ hb₂)⟩
#align filter.rcomap' Filter.rcomap'
@[simp]
theorem mem_rcomap' (r : Rel α β) (l : Filter β) (s : Set α) :
s ∈ l.rcomap' r ↔ ∃ t ∈ l, r.preimage t ⊆ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_rcomap' Filter.mem_rcomap'
theorem rcomap'_sets (r : Rel α β) (f : Filter β) :
(rcomap' r f).sets = Rel.image (fun s t => r.preimage s ⊆ t) f.sets :=
rfl
#align filter.rcomap'_sets Filter.rcomap'_sets
@[simp]
theorem rcomap'_rcomap' (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) (l : Filter γ) :
rcomap' r (rcomap' s l) = rcomap' (r.comp s) l :=
Filter.ext fun t => by
simp only [mem_rcomap', Rel.preimage_comp]
constructor
· rintro ⟨u, ⟨v, vsets, hv⟩, h⟩
exact ⟨v, vsets, (Rel.preimage_mono _ hv).trans h⟩
rintro ⟨t, tsets, ht⟩
exact ⟨s.preimage t, ⟨t, tsets, Set.Subset.rfl⟩, ht⟩
#align filter.rcomap'_rcomap' Filter.rcomap'_rcomap'
@[simp]
theorem rcomap'_compose (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) : rcomap' r ∘ rcomap' s = rcomap' (r.comp s) :=
funext <| rcomap'_rcomap' _ _
#align filter.rcomap'_compose Filter.rcomap'_compose
def RTendsto' (r : Rel α β) (l₁ : Filter α) (l₂ : Filter β) :=
l₁ ≤ l₂.rcomap' r
#align filter.rtendsto' Filter.RTendsto'
theorem rtendsto'_def (r : Rel α β) (l₁ : Filter α) (l₂ : Filter β) :
RTendsto' r l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ s ∈ l₂, r.preimage s ∈ l₁ := by
unfold RTendsto' rcomap'; simp [le_def, Rel.mem_image]; constructor
· exact fun h s hs => h _ _ hs Set.Subset.rfl
· exact fun h s t ht => mem_of_superset (h t ht)
#align filter.rtendsto'_def Filter.rtendsto'_def
theorem tendsto_iff_rtendsto (l₁ : Filter α) (l₂ : Filter β) (f : α → β) :
Tendsto f l₁ l₂ ↔ RTendsto (Function.graph f) l₁ l₂ := by
simp [tendsto_def, Function.graph, rtendsto_def, Rel.core, Set.preimage]
#align filter.tendsto_iff_rtendsto Filter.tendsto_iff_rtendsto
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Partial.lean | 200 | 202 | theorem tendsto_iff_rtendsto' (l₁ : Filter α) (l₂ : Filter β) (f : α → β) :
Tendsto f l₁ l₂ ↔ RTendsto' (Function.graph f) l₁ l₂ := by |
simp [tendsto_def, Function.graph, rtendsto'_def, Rel.preimage_def, Set.preimage]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Equiv
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Span
#align_import algebra.algebra.tower from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"71150516f28d9826c7341f8815b31f7d8770c212"
open Pointwise
universe u v w u₁ v₁
variable (R : Type u) (S : Type v) (A : Type w) (B : Type u₁) (M : Type v₁)
namespace IsScalarTower
section Module
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
variable [MulAction A M]
variable {R} {M}
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/Tower.lean | 88 | 90 | theorem algebraMap_smul [SMul R M] [IsScalarTower R A M] (r : R) (x : M) :
algebraMap R A r • x = r • x := by |
rw [Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, smul_assoc, one_smul]
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.