Context stringlengths 57 85k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 2.42k | end int64 18 2.43k | theorem stringlengths 25 2.71k | proof stringlengths 5 10.6k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
import Mathlib.Data.List.Forall2
#align_import data.list.zip from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"134625f523e737f650a6ea7f0c82a6177e45e622"
-- Make sure we don't import algebra
assert_not_exists Monoid
universe u
open Nat
namespace List
variable {α : Type u} {β γ δ ε : Type*}
#align list.zip_with_cons_cons List.zipWith_cons_cons
#align list.zip_cons_cons List.zip_cons_cons
#align list.zip_with_nil_left List.zipWith_nil_left
#align list.zip_with_nil_right List.zipWith_nil_right
#align list.zip_with_eq_nil_iff List.zipWith_eq_nil_iff
#align list.zip_nil_left List.zip_nil_left
#align list.zip_nil_right List.zip_nil_right
@[simp]
theorem zip_swap : ∀ (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β), (zip l₁ l₂).map Prod.swap = zip l₂ l₁
| [], l₂ => zip_nil_right.symm
| l₁, [] => by rw [zip_nil_right]; rfl
| a :: l₁, b :: l₂ => by
simp only [zip_cons_cons, map_cons, zip_swap l₁ l₂, Prod.swap_prod_mk]
#align list.zip_swap List.zip_swap
#align list.length_zip_with List.length_zipWith
#align list.length_zip List.length_zip
theorem forall_zipWith {f : α → β → γ} {p : γ → Prop} :
∀ {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β}, length l₁ = length l₂ →
(Forall p (zipWith f l₁ l₂) ↔ Forall₂ (fun x y => p (f x y)) l₁ l₂)
| [], [], _ => by simp
| a :: l₁, b :: l₂, h => by
simp only [length_cons, succ_inj'] at h
simp [forall_zipWith h]
#align list.all₂_zip_with List.forall_zipWith
theorem lt_length_left_of_zipWith {f : α → β → γ} {i : ℕ} {l : List α} {l' : List β}
(h : i < (zipWith f l l').length) : i < l.length := by rw [length_zipWith] at h; omega
#align list.lt_length_left_of_zip_with List.lt_length_left_of_zipWith
theorem lt_length_right_of_zipWith {f : α → β → γ} {i : ℕ} {l : List α} {l' : List β}
(h : i < (zipWith f l l').length) : i < l'.length := by rw [length_zipWith] at h; omega
#align list.lt_length_right_of_zip_with List.lt_length_right_of_zipWith
theorem lt_length_left_of_zip {i : ℕ} {l : List α} {l' : List β} (h : i < (zip l l').length) :
i < l.length :=
lt_length_left_of_zipWith h
#align list.lt_length_left_of_zip List.lt_length_left_of_zip
theorem lt_length_right_of_zip {i : ℕ} {l : List α} {l' : List β} (h : i < (zip l l').length) :
i < l'.length :=
lt_length_right_of_zipWith h
#align list.lt_length_right_of_zip List.lt_length_right_of_zip
#align list.zip_append List.zip_append
#align list.zip_map List.zip_map
#align list.zip_map_left List.zip_map_left
#align list.zip_map_right List.zip_map_right
#align list.zip_with_map List.zipWith_map
#align list.zip_with_map_left List.zipWith_map_left
#align list.zip_with_map_right List.zipWith_map_right
#align list.zip_map' List.zip_map'
#align list.map_zip_with List.map_zipWith
theorem mem_zip {a b} : ∀ {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β}, (a, b) ∈ zip l₁ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ ∧ b ∈ l₂
| _ :: l₁, _ :: l₂, h => by
cases' h with _ _ _ h
· simp
· have := mem_zip h
exact ⟨Mem.tail _ this.1, Mem.tail _ this.2⟩
#align list.mem_zip List.mem_zip
#align list.map_fst_zip List.map_fst_zip
#align list.map_snd_zip List.map_snd_zip
#align list.unzip_nil List.unzip_nil
#align list.unzip_cons List.unzip_cons
theorem unzip_eq_map : ∀ l : List (α × β), unzip l = (l.map Prod.fst, l.map Prod.snd)
| [] => rfl
| (a, b) :: l => by simp only [unzip_cons, map_cons, unzip_eq_map l]
#align list.unzip_eq_map List.unzip_eq_map
theorem unzip_left (l : List (α × β)) : (unzip l).1 = l.map Prod.fst := by simp only [unzip_eq_map]
#align list.unzip_left List.unzip_left
theorem unzip_right (l : List (α × β)) : (unzip l).2 = l.map Prod.snd := by simp only [unzip_eq_map]
#align list.unzip_right List.unzip_right
theorem unzip_swap (l : List (α × β)) : unzip (l.map Prod.swap) = (unzip l).swap := by
simp only [unzip_eq_map, map_map]
rfl
#align list.unzip_swap List.unzip_swap
theorem zip_unzip : ∀ l : List (α × β), zip (unzip l).1 (unzip l).2 = l
| [] => rfl
| (a, b) :: l => by simp only [unzip_cons, zip_cons_cons, zip_unzip l]
#align list.zip_unzip List.zip_unzip
theorem unzip_zip_left :
∀ {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β}, length l₁ ≤ length l₂ → (unzip (zip l₁ l₂)).1 = l₁
| [], l₂, _ => rfl
| l₁, [], h => by rw [eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero (Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero h)]; rfl
| a :: l₁, b :: l₂, h => by
simp only [zip_cons_cons, unzip_cons, unzip_zip_left (le_of_succ_le_succ h)]
#align list.unzip_zip_left List.unzip_zip_left
theorem unzip_zip_right {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β} (h : length l₂ ≤ length l₁) :
(unzip (zip l₁ l₂)).2 = l₂ := by rw [← zip_swap, unzip_swap]; exact unzip_zip_left h
#align list.unzip_zip_right List.unzip_zip_right
| Mathlib/Data/List/Zip.lean | 137 | 140 | theorem unzip_zip {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β} (h : length l₁ = length l₂) :
unzip (zip l₁ l₂) = (l₁, l₂) := by |
rw [← Prod.mk.eta (p := unzip (zip l₁ l₂)),
unzip_zip_left (le_of_eq h), unzip_zip_right (ge_of_eq h)]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.MinMax
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.WithTop
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Image
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Fold
#align_import data.finset.fold from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9003f28797c0664a49e4179487267c494477d853"
-- TODO:
-- assert_not_exists OrderedCommMonoid
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
namespace Finset
open Multiset
variable {α β γ : Type*}
section Fold
variable (op : β → β → β) [hc : Std.Commutative op] [ha : Std.Associative op]
local notation a " * " b => op a b
def fold (b : β) (f : α → β) (s : Finset α) : β :=
(s.1.map f).fold op b
#align finset.fold Finset.fold
variable {op} {f : α → β} {b : β} {s : Finset α} {a : α}
@[simp]
theorem fold_empty : (∅ : Finset α).fold op b f = b :=
rfl
#align finset.fold_empty Finset.fold_empty
@[simp]
theorem fold_cons (h : a ∉ s) : (cons a s h).fold op b f = f a * s.fold op b f := by
dsimp only [fold]
rw [cons_val, Multiset.map_cons, fold_cons_left]
#align finset.fold_cons Finset.fold_cons
@[simp]
theorem fold_insert [DecidableEq α] (h : a ∉ s) :
(insert a s).fold op b f = f a * s.fold op b f := by
unfold fold
rw [insert_val, ndinsert_of_not_mem h, Multiset.map_cons, fold_cons_left]
#align finset.fold_insert Finset.fold_insert
@[simp]
theorem fold_singleton : ({a} : Finset α).fold op b f = f a * b :=
rfl
#align finset.fold_singleton Finset.fold_singleton
@[simp]
theorem fold_map {g : γ ↪ α} {s : Finset γ} : (s.map g).fold op b f = s.fold op b (f ∘ g) := by
simp only [fold, map, Multiset.map_map]
#align finset.fold_map Finset.fold_map
@[simp]
theorem fold_image [DecidableEq α] {g : γ → α} {s : Finset γ}
(H : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, g x = g y → x = y) : (s.image g).fold op b f = s.fold op b (f ∘ g) := by
simp only [fold, image_val_of_injOn H, Multiset.map_map]
#align finset.fold_image Finset.fold_image
@[congr]
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Fold.lean | 79 | 80 | theorem fold_congr {g : α → β} (H : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = g x) : s.fold op b f = s.fold op b g := by |
rw [fold, fold, map_congr rfl H]
|
import Mathlib.Probability.Notation
import Mathlib.Probability.Density
import Mathlib.Probability.ConditionalProbability
import Mathlib.Probability.ProbabilityMassFunction.Constructions
open scoped Classical MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal
-- TODO: We can't `open ProbabilityTheory` without opening the `ProbabilityTheory` locale :(
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Measure PMF
noncomputable section
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {E : Type*} [MeasurableSpace E] {m : Measure E} {μ : Measure E}
namespace pdf
variable {Ω : Type*}
variable {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {ℙ : Measure Ω}
def IsUniform (X : Ω → E) (s : Set E) (ℙ : Measure Ω) (μ : Measure E := by volume_tac) :=
map X ℙ = ProbabilityTheory.cond μ s
#align measure_theory.pdf.is_uniform MeasureTheory.pdf.IsUniform
namespace IsUniform
theorem aemeasurable {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hns : μ s ≠ 0) (hnt : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) : AEMeasurable X ℙ := by
dsimp [IsUniform, ProbabilityTheory.cond] at hu
by_contra h
rw [map_of_not_aemeasurable h] at hu
apply zero_ne_one' ℝ≥0∞
calc
0 = (0 : Measure E) Set.univ := rfl
_ = _ := by rw [hu, smul_apply, restrict_apply MeasurableSet.univ,
Set.univ_inter, smul_eq_mul, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel hns hnt]
theorem absolutelyContinuous {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) : map X ℙ ≪ μ := by
rw [hu]; exact ProbabilityTheory.cond_absolutelyContinuous
| Mathlib/Probability/Distributions/Uniform.lean | 80 | 84 | theorem measure_preimage {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hns : μ s ≠ 0) (hnt : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) {A : Set E} (hA : MeasurableSet A) :
ℙ (X ⁻¹' A) = μ (s ∩ A) / μ s := by |
rwa [← map_apply_of_aemeasurable (hu.aemeasurable hns hnt) hA, hu, ProbabilityTheory.cond_apply',
ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.SigmaCompact
import Mathlib.Topology.Connected.TotallyDisconnected
import Mathlib.Topology.Inseparable
#align_import topology.separation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d91e7f7a7f1c7e9f0e18fdb6bde4f652004c735d"
open Function Set Filter Topology TopologicalSpace
open scoped Classical
universe u v
variable {X : Type*} {Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
section Separation
def SeparatedNhds : Set X → Set X → Prop := fun s t : Set X =>
∃ U V : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ IsOpen V ∧ s ⊆ U ∧ t ⊆ V ∧ Disjoint U V
#align separated_nhds SeparatedNhds
theorem separatedNhds_iff_disjoint {s t : Set X} : SeparatedNhds s t ↔ Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) (𝓝ˢ t) := by
simp only [(hasBasis_nhdsSet s).disjoint_iff (hasBasis_nhdsSet t), SeparatedNhds, exists_prop, ←
exists_and_left, and_assoc, and_comm, and_left_comm]
#align separated_nhds_iff_disjoint separatedNhds_iff_disjoint
alias ⟨SeparatedNhds.disjoint_nhdsSet, _⟩ := separatedNhds_iff_disjoint
class T0Space (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
t0 : ∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, Inseparable x y → x = y
#align t0_space T0Space
theorem t0Space_iff_inseparable (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] :
T0Space X ↔ ∀ x y : X, Inseparable x y → x = y :=
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => h, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
#align t0_space_iff_inseparable t0Space_iff_inseparable
| Mathlib/Topology/Separation.lean | 201 | 203 | theorem t0Space_iff_not_inseparable (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] :
T0Space X ↔ Pairwise fun x y : X => ¬Inseparable x y := by |
simp only [t0Space_iff_inseparable, Ne, not_imp_not, Pairwise]
|
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Lift
import Mathlib.Topology.Defs.Filter
#align_import topology.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e354e865255654389cc46e6032160238df2e0f40"
noncomputable section
open Set Filter
universe u v w x
def TopologicalSpace.ofClosed {X : Type u} (T : Set (Set X)) (empty_mem : ∅ ∈ T)
(sInter_mem : ∀ A, A ⊆ T → ⋂₀ A ∈ T)
(union_mem : ∀ A, A ∈ T → ∀ B, B ∈ T → A ∪ B ∈ T) : TopologicalSpace X where
IsOpen X := Xᶜ ∈ T
isOpen_univ := by simp [empty_mem]
isOpen_inter s t hs ht := by simpa only [compl_inter] using union_mem sᶜ hs tᶜ ht
isOpen_sUnion s hs := by
simp only [Set.compl_sUnion]
exact sInter_mem (compl '' s) fun z ⟨y, hy, hz⟩ => hz ▸ hs y hy
#align topological_space.of_closed TopologicalSpace.ofClosed
section TopologicalSpace
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Sort w} {α β : Type*}
{x : X} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set X} {p p₁ p₂ : X → Prop}
open Topology
lemma isOpen_mk {p h₁ h₂ h₃} : IsOpen[⟨p, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩] s ↔ p s := Iff.rfl
#align is_open_mk isOpen_mk
@[ext]
protected theorem TopologicalSpace.ext :
∀ {f g : TopologicalSpace X}, IsOpen[f] = IsOpen[g] → f = g
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
#align topological_space_eq TopologicalSpace.ext
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
end
protected theorem TopologicalSpace.ext_iff {t t' : TopologicalSpace X} :
t = t' ↔ ∀ s, IsOpen[t] s ↔ IsOpen[t'] s :=
⟨fun h s => h ▸ Iff.rfl, fun h => by ext; exact h _⟩
#align topological_space_eq_iff TopologicalSpace.ext_iff
theorem isOpen_fold {t : TopologicalSpace X} : t.IsOpen s = IsOpen[t] s :=
rfl
#align is_open_fold isOpen_fold
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
theorem isOpen_iUnion {f : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i)) : IsOpen (⋃ i, f i) :=
isOpen_sUnion (forall_mem_range.2 h)
#align is_open_Union isOpen_iUnion
theorem isOpen_biUnion {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
isOpen_iUnion fun i => isOpen_iUnion fun hi => h i hi
#align is_open_bUnion isOpen_biUnion
theorem IsOpen.union (h₁ : IsOpen s₁) (h₂ : IsOpen s₂) : IsOpen (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion]; exact isOpen_iUnion (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨h₂, h₁⟩)
#align is_open.union IsOpen.union
lemma isOpen_iff_of_cover {f : α → Set X} (ho : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i)) (hU : (⋃ i, f i) = univ) :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ i, IsOpen (f i ∩ s) := by
refine ⟨fun h i ↦ (ho i).inter h, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← s.inter_univ, inter_comm, ← hU, iUnion_inter]
exact isOpen_iUnion fun i ↦ h i
@[simp] theorem isOpen_empty : IsOpen (∅ : Set X) := by
rw [← sUnion_empty]; exact isOpen_sUnion fun a => False.elim
#align is_open_empty isOpen_empty
theorem Set.Finite.isOpen_sInter {s : Set (Set X)} (hs : s.Finite) :
(∀ t ∈ s, IsOpen t) → IsOpen (⋂₀ s) :=
Finite.induction_on hs (fun _ => by rw [sInter_empty]; exact isOpen_univ) fun _ _ ih h => by
simp only [sInter_insert, forall_mem_insert] at h ⊢
exact h.1.inter (ih h.2)
#align is_open_sInter Set.Finite.isOpen_sInter
theorem Set.Finite.isOpen_biInter {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
sInter_image f s ▸ (hs.image _).isOpen_sInter (forall_mem_image.2 h)
#align is_open_bInter Set.Finite.isOpen_biInter
theorem isOpen_iInter_of_finite [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsOpen (s i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i, s i) :=
(finite_range _).isOpen_sInter (forall_mem_range.2 h)
#align is_open_Inter isOpen_iInter_of_finite
theorem isOpen_biInter_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isOpen_biInter h
#align is_open_bInter_finset isOpen_biInter_finset
@[simp] -- Porting note: added `simp`
theorem isOpen_const {p : Prop} : IsOpen { _x : X | p } := by by_cases p <;> simp [*]
#align is_open_const isOpen_const
theorem IsOpen.and : IsOpen { x | p₁ x } → IsOpen { x | p₂ x } → IsOpen { x | p₁ x ∧ p₂ x } :=
IsOpen.inter
#align is_open.and IsOpen.and
@[simp] theorem isOpen_compl_iff : IsOpen sᶜ ↔ IsClosed s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, fun h => h.isOpen_compl⟩
#align is_open_compl_iff isOpen_compl_iff
theorem TopologicalSpace.ext_iff_isClosed {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace X} :
t₁ = t₂ ↔ ∀ s, IsClosed[t₁] s ↔ IsClosed[t₂] s := by
rw [TopologicalSpace.ext_iff, compl_surjective.forall]
simp only [@isOpen_compl_iff _ _ t₁, @isOpen_compl_iff _ _ t₂]
alias ⟨_, TopologicalSpace.ext_isClosed⟩ := TopologicalSpace.ext_iff_isClosed
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
theorem isClosed_const {p : Prop} : IsClosed { _x : X | p } := ⟨isOpen_const (p := ¬p)⟩
@[simp] theorem isClosed_empty : IsClosed (∅ : Set X) := isClosed_const
#align is_closed_empty isClosed_empty
@[simp] theorem isClosed_univ : IsClosed (univ : Set X) := isClosed_const
#align is_closed_univ isClosed_univ
theorem IsClosed.union : IsClosed s₁ → IsClosed s₂ → IsClosed (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
simpa only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_union] using IsOpen.inter
#align is_closed.union IsClosed.union
theorem isClosed_sInter {s : Set (Set X)} : (∀ t ∈ s, IsClosed t) → IsClosed (⋂₀ s) := by
simpa only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_sInter, sUnion_image] using isOpen_biUnion
#align is_closed_sInter isClosed_sInter
theorem isClosed_iInter {f : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsClosed (f i)) : IsClosed (⋂ i, f i) :=
isClosed_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 h
#align is_closed_Inter isClosed_iInter
theorem isClosed_biInter {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
isClosed_iInter fun i => isClosed_iInter <| h i
#align is_closed_bInter isClosed_biInter
@[simp]
theorem isClosed_compl_iff {s : Set X} : IsClosed sᶜ ↔ IsOpen s := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_compl]
#align is_closed_compl_iff isClosed_compl_iff
alias ⟨_, IsOpen.isClosed_compl⟩ := isClosed_compl_iff
#align is_open.is_closed_compl IsOpen.isClosed_compl
theorem IsOpen.sdiff (h₁ : IsOpen s) (h₂ : IsClosed t) : IsOpen (s \ t) :=
IsOpen.inter h₁ h₂.isOpen_compl
#align is_open.sdiff IsOpen.sdiff
theorem IsClosed.inter (h₁ : IsClosed s₁) (h₂ : IsClosed s₂) : IsClosed (s₁ ∩ s₂) := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff] at *
rw [compl_inter]
exact IsOpen.union h₁ h₂
#align is_closed.inter IsClosed.inter
theorem IsClosed.sdiff (h₁ : IsClosed s) (h₂ : IsOpen t) : IsClosed (s \ t) :=
IsClosed.inter h₁ (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr h₂)
#align is_closed.sdiff IsClosed.sdiff
theorem Set.Finite.isClosed_biUnion {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_iUnion] at *
exact hs.isOpen_biInter h
#align is_closed_bUnion Set.Finite.isClosed_biUnion
lemma isClosed_biUnion_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isClosed_biUnion h
theorem isClosed_iUnion_of_finite [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsClosed (s i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i, s i) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_iUnion] at *
exact isOpen_iInter_of_finite h
#align is_closed_Union isClosed_iUnion_of_finite
theorem isClosed_imp {p q : X → Prop} (hp : IsOpen { x | p x }) (hq : IsClosed { x | q x }) :
IsClosed { x | p x → q x } := by
simpa only [imp_iff_not_or] using hp.isClosed_compl.union hq
#align is_closed_imp isClosed_imp
theorem IsClosed.not : IsClosed { a | p a } → IsOpen { a | ¬p a } :=
isOpen_compl_iff.mpr
#align is_closed.not IsClosed.not
theorem mem_interior : x ∈ interior s ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, IsOpen t ∧ x ∈ t := by
simp only [interior, mem_sUnion, mem_setOf_eq, and_assoc, and_left_comm]
#align mem_interior mem_interiorₓ
@[simp]
theorem isOpen_interior : IsOpen (interior s) :=
isOpen_sUnion fun _ => And.left
#align is_open_interior isOpen_interior
theorem interior_subset : interior s ⊆ s :=
sUnion_subset fun _ => And.right
#align interior_subset interior_subset
theorem interior_maximal (h₁ : t ⊆ s) (h₂ : IsOpen t) : t ⊆ interior s :=
subset_sUnion_of_mem ⟨h₂, h₁⟩
#align interior_maximal interior_maximal
theorem IsOpen.interior_eq (h : IsOpen s) : interior s = s :=
interior_subset.antisymm (interior_maximal (Subset.refl s) h)
#align is_open.interior_eq IsOpen.interior_eq
theorem interior_eq_iff_isOpen : interior s = s ↔ IsOpen s :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ isOpen_interior, IsOpen.interior_eq⟩
#align interior_eq_iff_is_open interior_eq_iff_isOpen
theorem subset_interior_iff_isOpen : s ⊆ interior s ↔ IsOpen s := by
simp only [interior_eq_iff_isOpen.symm, Subset.antisymm_iff, interior_subset, true_and]
#align subset_interior_iff_is_open subset_interior_iff_isOpen
theorem IsOpen.subset_interior_iff (h₁ : IsOpen s) : s ⊆ interior t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h => Subset.trans h interior_subset, fun h₂ => interior_maximal h₂ h₁⟩
#align is_open.subset_interior_iff IsOpen.subset_interior_iff
theorem subset_interior_iff : t ⊆ interior s ↔ ∃ U, IsOpen U ∧ t ⊆ U ∧ U ⊆ s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨interior s, isOpen_interior, h, interior_subset⟩, fun ⟨_U, hU, htU, hUs⟩ =>
htU.trans (interior_maximal hUs hU)⟩
#align subset_interior_iff subset_interior_iff
lemma interior_subset_iff : interior s ⊆ t ↔ ∀ U, IsOpen U → U ⊆ s → U ⊆ t := by
simp [interior]
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem interior_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : interior s ⊆ interior t :=
interior_maximal (Subset.trans interior_subset h) isOpen_interior
#align interior_mono interior_mono
@[simp]
theorem interior_empty : interior (∅ : Set X) = ∅ :=
isOpen_empty.interior_eq
#align interior_empty interior_empty
@[simp]
theorem interior_univ : interior (univ : Set X) = univ :=
isOpen_univ.interior_eq
#align interior_univ interior_univ
@[simp]
theorem interior_eq_univ : interior s = univ ↔ s = univ :=
⟨fun h => univ_subset_iff.mp <| h.symm.trans_le interior_subset, fun h => h.symm ▸ interior_univ⟩
#align interior_eq_univ interior_eq_univ
@[simp]
theorem interior_interior : interior (interior s) = interior s :=
isOpen_interior.interior_eq
#align interior_interior interior_interior
@[simp]
theorem interior_inter : interior (s ∩ t) = interior s ∩ interior t :=
(Monotone.map_inf_le (fun _ _ ↦ interior_mono) s t).antisymm <|
interior_maximal (inter_subset_inter interior_subset interior_subset) <|
isOpen_interior.inter isOpen_interior
#align interior_inter interior_inter
theorem Set.Finite.interior_biInter {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite) (f : ι → Set X) :
interior (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) = ⋂ i ∈ s, interior (f i) :=
hs.induction_on (by simp) <| by intros; simp [*]
theorem Set.Finite.interior_sInter {S : Set (Set X)} (hS : S.Finite) :
interior (⋂₀ S) = ⋂ s ∈ S, interior s := by
rw [sInter_eq_biInter, hS.interior_biInter]
@[simp]
theorem Finset.interior_iInter {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Set X) :
interior (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) = ⋂ i ∈ s, interior (f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.interior_biInter f
#align finset.interior_Inter Finset.interior_iInter
@[simp]
theorem interior_iInter_of_finite [Finite ι] (f : ι → Set X) :
interior (⋂ i, f i) = ⋂ i, interior (f i) := by
rw [← sInter_range, (finite_range f).interior_sInter, biInter_range]
#align interior_Inter interior_iInter_of_finite
| Mathlib/Topology/Basic.lean | 342 | 350 | theorem interior_union_isClosed_of_interior_empty (h₁ : IsClosed s)
(h₂ : interior t = ∅) : interior (s ∪ t) = interior s :=
have : interior (s ∪ t) ⊆ s := fun x ⟨u, ⟨(hu₁ : IsOpen u), (hu₂ : u ⊆ s ∪ t)⟩, (hx₁ : x ∈ u)⟩ =>
by_contradiction fun hx₂ : x ∉ s =>
have : u \ s ⊆ t := fun x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => Or.resolve_left (hu₂ h₁) h₂
have : u \ s ⊆ interior t := by | rwa [(IsOpen.sdiff hu₁ h₁).subset_interior_iff]
have : u \ s ⊆ ∅ := by rwa [h₂] at this
this ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
Subset.antisymm (interior_maximal this isOpen_interior) (interior_mono subset_union_left)
|
import Mathlib.Probability.Martingale.Convergence
import Mathlib.Probability.Martingale.OptionalStopping
import Mathlib.Probability.Martingale.Centering
#align_import probability.martingale.borel_cantelli from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
open Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory BigOperators Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω : Type*} {m0 : MeasurableSpace Ω} {μ : Measure Ω} {ℱ : Filtration ℕ m0} {f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ}
{ω : Ω}
-- TODO: `leastGE` should be defined taking values in `WithTop ℕ` once the `stoppedProcess`
-- refactor is complete
noncomputable def leastGE (f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ) (r : ℝ) (n : ℕ) :=
hitting f (Set.Ici r) 0 n
#align measure_theory.least_ge MeasureTheory.leastGE
theorem Adapted.isStoppingTime_leastGE (r : ℝ) (n : ℕ) (hf : Adapted ℱ f) :
IsStoppingTime ℱ (leastGE f r n) :=
hitting_isStoppingTime hf measurableSet_Ici
#align measure_theory.adapted.is_stopping_time_least_ge MeasureTheory.Adapted.isStoppingTime_leastGE
theorem leastGE_le {i : ℕ} {r : ℝ} (ω : Ω) : leastGE f r i ω ≤ i :=
hitting_le ω
#align measure_theory.least_ge_le MeasureTheory.leastGE_le
-- The following four lemmas shows `leastGE` behaves like a stopped process. Ideally we should
-- define `leastGE` as a stopping time and take its stopped process. However, we can't do that
-- with our current definition since a stopping time takes only finite indicies. An upcomming
-- refactor should hopefully make it possible to have stopping times taking infinity as a value
theorem leastGE_mono {n m : ℕ} (hnm : n ≤ m) (r : ℝ) (ω : Ω) : leastGE f r n ω ≤ leastGE f r m ω :=
hitting_mono hnm
#align measure_theory.least_ge_mono MeasureTheory.leastGE_mono
theorem leastGE_eq_min (π : Ω → ℕ) (r : ℝ) (ω : Ω) {n : ℕ} (hπn : ∀ ω, π ω ≤ n) :
leastGE f r (π ω) ω = min (π ω) (leastGE f r n ω) := by
classical
refine le_antisymm (le_min (leastGE_le _) (leastGE_mono (hπn ω) r ω)) ?_
by_cases hle : π ω ≤ leastGE f r n ω
· rw [min_eq_left hle, leastGE]
by_cases h : ∃ j ∈ Set.Icc 0 (π ω), f j ω ∈ Set.Ici r
· refine hle.trans (Eq.le ?_)
rw [leastGE, ← hitting_eq_hitting_of_exists (hπn ω) h]
· simp only [hitting, if_neg h, le_rfl]
· rw [min_eq_right (not_le.1 hle).le, leastGE, leastGE, ←
hitting_eq_hitting_of_exists (hπn ω) _]
rw [not_le, leastGE, hitting_lt_iff _ (hπn ω)] at hle
exact
let ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩ := hle
⟨j, ⟨hj₁.1, hj₁.2.le⟩, hj₂⟩
#align measure_theory.least_ge_eq_min MeasureTheory.leastGE_eq_min
theorem stoppedValue_stoppedValue_leastGE (f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ) (π : Ω → ℕ) (r : ℝ) {n : ℕ}
(hπn : ∀ ω, π ω ≤ n) : stoppedValue (fun i => stoppedValue f (leastGE f r i)) π =
stoppedValue (stoppedProcess f (leastGE f r n)) π := by
ext1 ω
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) only [stoppedProcess, stoppedValue]
rw [leastGE_eq_min _ _ _ hπn]
#align measure_theory.stopped_value_stopped_value_least_ge MeasureTheory.stoppedValue_stoppedValue_leastGE
theorem Submartingale.stoppedValue_leastGE [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) (r : ℝ) :
Submartingale (fun i => stoppedValue f (leastGE f r i)) ℱ μ := by
rw [submartingale_iff_expected_stoppedValue_mono]
· intro σ π hσ hπ hσ_le_π hπ_bdd
obtain ⟨n, hπ_le_n⟩ := hπ_bdd
simp_rw [stoppedValue_stoppedValue_leastGE f σ r fun i => (hσ_le_π i).trans (hπ_le_n i)]
simp_rw [stoppedValue_stoppedValue_leastGE f π r hπ_le_n]
refine hf.expected_stoppedValue_mono ?_ ?_ ?_ fun ω => (min_le_left _ _).trans (hπ_le_n ω)
· exact hσ.min (hf.adapted.isStoppingTime_leastGE _ _)
· exact hπ.min (hf.adapted.isStoppingTime_leastGE _ _)
· exact fun ω => min_le_min (hσ_le_π ω) le_rfl
· exact fun i => stronglyMeasurable_stoppedValue_of_le hf.adapted.progMeasurable_of_discrete
(hf.adapted.isStoppingTime_leastGE _ _) leastGE_le
· exact fun i => integrable_stoppedValue _ (hf.adapted.isStoppingTime_leastGE _ _) hf.integrable
leastGE_le
#align measure_theory.submartingale.stopped_value_least_ge MeasureTheory.Submartingale.stoppedValue_leastGE
variable {r : ℝ} {R : ℝ≥0}
theorem norm_stoppedValue_leastGE_le (hr : 0 ≤ r) (hf0 : f 0 = 0)
(hbdd : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ i, |f (i + 1) ω - f i ω| ≤ R) (i : ℕ) :
∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, stoppedValue f (leastGE f r i) ω ≤ r + R := by
filter_upwards [hbdd] with ω hbddω
change f (leastGE f r i ω) ω ≤ r + R
by_cases heq : leastGE f r i ω = 0
· rw [heq, hf0, Pi.zero_apply]
exact add_nonneg hr R.coe_nonneg
· obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero heq
rw [hk, add_comm, ← sub_le_iff_le_add]
have := not_mem_of_lt_hitting (hk.symm ▸ k.lt_succ_self : k < leastGE f r i ω) (zero_le _)
simp only [Set.mem_union, Set.mem_Iic, Set.mem_Ici, not_or, not_le] at this
exact (sub_lt_sub_left this _).le.trans ((le_abs_self _).trans (hbddω _))
#align measure_theory.norm_stopped_value_least_ge_le MeasureTheory.norm_stoppedValue_leastGE_le
| Mathlib/Probability/Martingale/BorelCantelli.lean | 135 | 142 | theorem Submartingale.stoppedValue_leastGE_snorm_le [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
(hr : 0 ≤ r) (hf0 : f 0 = 0) (hbdd : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ i, |f (i + 1) ω - f i ω| ≤ R) (i : ℕ) :
snorm (stoppedValue f (leastGE f r i)) 1 μ ≤ 2 * μ Set.univ * ENNReal.ofReal (r + R) := by |
refine snorm_one_le_of_le' ((hf.stoppedValue_leastGE r).integrable _) ?_
(norm_stoppedValue_leastGE_le hr hf0 hbdd i)
rw [← integral_univ]
refine le_trans ?_ ((hf.stoppedValue_leastGE r).setIntegral_le (zero_le _) MeasurableSet.univ)
simp_rw [stoppedValue, leastGE, hitting_of_le le_rfl, hf0, integral_zero', le_rfl]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Instances
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.ProjIcc
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Real
#align_import topology.unit_interval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology Filter
open Set Int Set.Icc
abbrev unitInterval : Set ℝ :=
Set.Icc 0 1
#align unit_interval unitInterval
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[unitInterval] notation "I" => unitInterval
namespace unitInterval
theorem zero_mem : (0 : ℝ) ∈ I :=
⟨le_rfl, zero_le_one⟩
#align unit_interval.zero_mem unitInterval.zero_mem
theorem one_mem : (1 : ℝ) ∈ I :=
⟨zero_le_one, le_rfl⟩
#align unit_interval.one_mem unitInterval.one_mem
theorem mul_mem {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ I) (hy : y ∈ I) : x * y ∈ I :=
⟨mul_nonneg hx.1 hy.1, mul_le_one hx.2 hy.1 hy.2⟩
#align unit_interval.mul_mem unitInterval.mul_mem
theorem div_mem {x y : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hxy : x ≤ y) : x / y ∈ I :=
⟨div_nonneg hx hy, div_le_one_of_le hxy hy⟩
#align unit_interval.div_mem unitInterval.div_mem
theorem fract_mem (x : ℝ) : fract x ∈ I :=
⟨fract_nonneg _, (fract_lt_one _).le⟩
#align unit_interval.fract_mem unitInterval.fract_mem
theorem mem_iff_one_sub_mem {t : ℝ} : t ∈ I ↔ 1 - t ∈ I := by
rw [mem_Icc, mem_Icc]
constructor <;> intro <;> constructor <;> linarith
#align unit_interval.mem_iff_one_sub_mem unitInterval.mem_iff_one_sub_mem
instance hasZero : Zero I :=
⟨⟨0, zero_mem⟩⟩
#align unit_interval.has_zero unitInterval.hasZero
instance hasOne : One I :=
⟨⟨1, by constructor <;> norm_num⟩⟩
#align unit_interval.has_one unitInterval.hasOne
instance : ZeroLEOneClass I := ⟨zero_le_one (α := ℝ)⟩
instance : BoundedOrder I := Set.Icc.boundedOrder zero_le_one
lemma univ_eq_Icc : (univ : Set I) = Icc (0 : I) (1 : I) := Icc_bot_top.symm
theorem coe_ne_zero {x : I} : (x : ℝ) ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
not_iff_not.mpr coe_eq_zero
#align unit_interval.coe_ne_zero unitInterval.coe_ne_zero
theorem coe_ne_one {x : I} : (x : ℝ) ≠ 1 ↔ x ≠ 1 :=
not_iff_not.mpr coe_eq_one
#align unit_interval.coe_ne_one unitInterval.coe_ne_one
instance : Nonempty I :=
⟨0⟩
instance : Mul I :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x * y, mul_mem x.2 y.2⟩⟩
-- todo: we could set up a `LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero I` instance
theorem mul_le_left {x y : I} : x * y ≤ x :=
Subtype.coe_le_coe.mp <| mul_le_of_le_one_right x.2.1 y.2.2
#align unit_interval.mul_le_left unitInterval.mul_le_left
theorem mul_le_right {x y : I} : x * y ≤ y :=
Subtype.coe_le_coe.mp <| mul_le_of_le_one_left y.2.1 x.2.2
#align unit_interval.mul_le_right unitInterval.mul_le_right
def symm : I → I := fun t => ⟨1 - t, mem_iff_one_sub_mem.mp t.prop⟩
#align unit_interval.symm unitInterval.symm
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "σ" => unitInterval.symm
@[simp]
theorem symm_zero : σ 0 = 1 :=
Subtype.ext <| by simp [symm]
#align unit_interval.symm_zero unitInterval.symm_zero
@[simp]
theorem symm_one : σ 1 = 0 :=
Subtype.ext <| by simp [symm]
#align unit_interval.symm_one unitInterval.symm_one
@[simp]
theorem symm_symm (x : I) : σ (σ x) = x :=
Subtype.ext <| by simp [symm]
#align unit_interval.symm_symm unitInterval.symm_symm
theorem symm_involutive : Function.Involutive (symm : I → I) := symm_symm
theorem symm_bijective : Function.Bijective (symm : I → I) := symm_involutive.bijective
@[simp]
theorem coe_symm_eq (x : I) : (σ x : ℝ) = 1 - x :=
rfl
#align unit_interval.coe_symm_eq unitInterval.coe_symm_eq
-- Porting note: Proof used to be `by continuity!`
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_symm : Continuous σ :=
(continuous_const.add continuous_induced_dom.neg).subtype_mk _
#align unit_interval.continuous_symm unitInterval.continuous_symm
@[simps]
def symmHomeomorph : I ≃ₜ I where
toFun := symm
invFun := symm
left_inv := symm_symm
right_inv := symm_symm
theorem strictAnti_symm : StrictAnti σ := fun _ _ h ↦ sub_lt_sub_left (α := ℝ) h _
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-27")] alias involutive_symm := symm_involutive
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-27")] alias bijective_symm := symm_bijective
theorem half_le_symm_iff (t : I) : 1 / 2 ≤ (σ t : ℝ) ↔ (t : ℝ) ≤ 1 / 2 := by
rw [coe_symm_eq, le_sub_iff_add_le, add_comm, ← le_sub_iff_add_le, sub_half]
instance : ConnectedSpace I :=
Subtype.connectedSpace ⟨nonempty_Icc.mpr zero_le_one, isPreconnected_Icc⟩
example : CompactSpace I := by infer_instance
theorem nonneg (x : I) : 0 ≤ (x : ℝ) :=
x.2.1
#align unit_interval.nonneg unitInterval.nonneg
theorem one_minus_nonneg (x : I) : 0 ≤ 1 - (x : ℝ) := by simpa using x.2.2
#align unit_interval.one_minus_nonneg unitInterval.one_minus_nonneg
theorem le_one (x : I) : (x : ℝ) ≤ 1 :=
x.2.2
#align unit_interval.le_one unitInterval.le_one
| Mathlib/Topology/UnitInterval.lean | 174 | 174 | theorem one_minus_le_one (x : I) : 1 - (x : ℝ) ≤ 1 := by | simpa using x.2.1
|
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
#align_import data.set.intervals.with_bot_top from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d012cd09a9b256d870751284dd6a29882b0be105"
open Set
variable {α : Type*}
namespace WithTop
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_top : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' {⊤} = (∅ : Set α) :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun _ => coe_ne_top
#align with_top.preimage_coe_top WithTop.preimage_coe_top
variable [Preorder α] {a b : α}
theorem range_coe : range (some : α → WithTop α) = Iio ⊤ := by
ext x
rw [mem_Iio, WithTop.lt_top_iff_ne_top, mem_range, ne_top_iff_exists]
#align with_top.range_coe WithTop.range_coe
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioi : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ioi a = Ioi a :=
ext fun _ => coe_lt_coe
#align with_top.preimage_coe_Ioi WithTop.preimage_coe_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ici : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ici a = Ici a :=
ext fun _ => coe_le_coe
#align with_top.preimage_coe_Ici WithTop.preimage_coe_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Iio : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Iio a = Iio a :=
ext fun _ => coe_lt_coe
#align with_top.preimage_coe_Iio WithTop.preimage_coe_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Iic : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Iic a = Iic a :=
ext fun _ => coe_le_coe
#align with_top.preimage_coe_Iic WithTop.preimage_coe_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Icc : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Icc a b = Icc a b := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
#align with_top.preimage_coe_Icc WithTop.preimage_coe_Icc
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/WithBotTop.lean | 63 | 63 | theorem preimage_coe_Ico : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ico a b = Ico a b := by | simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Elementwise
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Evaluation
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Elementwise
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adhesive
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.ConcreteSheafification
#align_import category_theory.sites.subsheaf from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
universe w v u
open Opposite CategoryTheory
namespace CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] (J : GrothendieckTopology C)
@[ext]
structure Subpresheaf (F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) where
obj : ∀ U, Set (F.obj U)
map : ∀ {U V : Cᵒᵖ} (i : U ⟶ V), obj U ⊆ F.map i ⁻¹' obj V
#align category_theory.grothendieck_topology.subpresheaf CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.Subpresheaf
variable {F F' F'' : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w} (G G' : Subpresheaf F)
instance : PartialOrder (Subpresheaf F) :=
PartialOrder.lift Subpresheaf.obj Subpresheaf.ext
instance : Top (Subpresheaf F) :=
⟨⟨fun U => ⊤, @fun U V _ x _ => by aesop_cat⟩⟩
instance : Nonempty (Subpresheaf F) :=
inferInstance
@[simps!]
def Subpresheaf.toPresheaf : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w where
obj U := G.obj U
map := @fun U V i x => ⟨F.map i x, G.map i x.prop⟩
map_id X := by
ext ⟨x, _⟩
dsimp
simp only [FunctorToTypes.map_id_apply]
map_comp := @fun X Y Z i j => by
ext ⟨x, _⟩
dsimp
simp only [FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply]
#align category_theory.grothendieck_topology.subpresheaf.to_presheaf CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.Subpresheaf.toPresheaf
instance {U} : CoeHead (G.toPresheaf.obj U) (F.obj U) where
coe := Subtype.val
@[simps]
def Subpresheaf.ι : G.toPresheaf ⟶ F where app U x := x
#align category_theory.grothendieck_topology.subpresheaf.ι CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.Subpresheaf.ι
instance : Mono G.ι :=
⟨@fun _ f₁ f₂ e =>
NatTrans.ext f₁ f₂ <|
funext fun U => funext fun x => Subtype.ext <| congr_fun (congr_app e U) x⟩
@[simps]
def Subpresheaf.homOfLe {G G' : Subpresheaf F} (h : G ≤ G') : G.toPresheaf ⟶ G'.toPresheaf where
app U x := ⟨x, h U x.prop⟩
#align category_theory.grothendieck_topology.subpresheaf.hom_of_le CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.Subpresheaf.homOfLe
instance {G G' : Subpresheaf F} (h : G ≤ G') : Mono (Subpresheaf.homOfLe h) :=
⟨fun f₁ f₂ e =>
NatTrans.ext f₁ f₂ <|
funext fun U =>
funext fun x =>
Subtype.ext <| (congr_arg Subtype.val <| (congr_fun (congr_app e U) x : _) : _)⟩
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem Subpresheaf.homOfLe_ι {G G' : Subpresheaf F} (h : G ≤ G') :
Subpresheaf.homOfLe h ≫ G'.ι = G.ι := by
ext
rfl
#align category_theory.grothendieck_topology.subpresheaf.hom_of_le_ι CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.Subpresheaf.homOfLe_ι
instance : IsIso (Subpresheaf.ι (⊤ : Subpresheaf F)) := by
refine @NatIso.isIso_of_isIso_app _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ?_
intro X
rw [isIso_iff_bijective]
exact ⟨Subtype.coe_injective, fun x => ⟨⟨x, _root_.trivial⟩, rfl⟩⟩
theorem Subpresheaf.eq_top_iff_isIso : G = ⊤ ↔ IsIso G.ι := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
infer_instance
· intro H
ext U x
apply iff_true_iff.mpr
rw [← IsIso.inv_hom_id_apply (G.ι.app U) x]
exact ((inv (G.ι.app U)) x).2
#align category_theory.grothendieck_topology.subpresheaf.eq_top_iff_is_iso CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.Subpresheaf.eq_top_iff_isIso
@[simps!]
def Subpresheaf.lift (f : F' ⟶ F) (hf : ∀ U x, f.app U x ∈ G.obj U) : F' ⟶ G.toPresheaf where
app U x := ⟨f.app U x, hf U x⟩
naturality := by
have := elementwise_of% f.naturality
intros
refine funext fun x => Subtype.ext ?_
simp only [toPresheaf_obj, types_comp_apply]
exact this _ _
#align category_theory.grothendieck_topology.subpresheaf.lift CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.Subpresheaf.lift
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem Subpresheaf.lift_ι (f : F' ⟶ F) (hf : ∀ U x, f.app U x ∈ G.obj U) :
G.lift f hf ≫ G.ι = f := by
ext
rfl
#align category_theory.grothendieck_topology.subpresheaf.lift_ι CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.Subpresheaf.lift_ι
@[simps]
def Subpresheaf.sieveOfSection {U : Cᵒᵖ} (s : F.obj U) : Sieve (unop U) where
arrows V f := F.map f.op s ∈ G.obj (op V)
downward_closed := @fun V W i hi j => by
simp only [op_unop, op_comp, FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply]
exact G.map _ hi
#align category_theory.grothendieck_topology.subpresheaf.sieve_of_section CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.Subpresheaf.sieveOfSection
def Subpresheaf.familyOfElementsOfSection {U : Cᵒᵖ} (s : F.obj U) :
(G.sieveOfSection s).1.FamilyOfElements G.toPresheaf := fun _ i hi => ⟨F.map i.op s, hi⟩
#align category_theory.grothendieck_topology.subpresheaf.family_of_elements_of_section CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.Subpresheaf.familyOfElementsOfSection
theorem Subpresheaf.family_of_elements_compatible {U : Cᵒᵖ} (s : F.obj U) :
(G.familyOfElementsOfSection s).Compatible := by
intro Y₁ Y₂ Z g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ e
refine Subtype.ext ?_ -- Porting note: `ext1` does not work here
change F.map g₁.op (F.map f₁.op s) = F.map g₂.op (F.map f₂.op s)
rw [← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, ← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, ← op_comp, ← op_comp, e]
#align category_theory.grothendieck_topology.subpresheaf.family_of_elements_compatible CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.Subpresheaf.family_of_elements_compatible
theorem Subpresheaf.nat_trans_naturality (f : F' ⟶ G.toPresheaf) {U V : Cᵒᵖ} (i : U ⟶ V)
(x : F'.obj U) : (f.app V (F'.map i x)).1 = F.map i (f.app U x).1 :=
congr_arg Subtype.val (FunctorToTypes.naturality _ _ f i x)
#align category_theory.grothendieck_topology.subpresheaf.nat_trans_naturality CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.Subpresheaf.nat_trans_naturality
def Subpresheaf.sheafify : Subpresheaf F where
obj U := { s | G.sieveOfSection s ∈ J (unop U) }
map := by
rintro U V i s hs
refine J.superset_covering ?_ (J.pullback_stable i.unop hs)
intro _ _ h
dsimp at h ⊢
rwa [← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply]
#align category_theory.grothendieck_topology.subpresheaf.sheafify CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.Subpresheaf.sheafify
theorem Subpresheaf.le_sheafify : G ≤ G.sheafify J := by
intro U s hs
change _ ∈ J _
convert J.top_mem U.unop -- Porting note: `U.unop` can not be inferred now
rw [eq_top_iff]
rintro V i -
exact G.map i.op hs
#align category_theory.grothendieck_topology.subpresheaf.le_sheafify CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.Subpresheaf.le_sheafify
variable {J}
theorem Subpresheaf.eq_sheafify (h : Presieve.IsSheaf J F) (hG : Presieve.IsSheaf J G.toPresheaf) :
G = G.sheafify J := by
apply (G.le_sheafify J).antisymm
intro U s hs
suffices ((hG _ hs).amalgamate _ (G.family_of_elements_compatible s)).1 = s by
rw [← this]
exact ((hG _ hs).amalgamate _ (G.family_of_elements_compatible s)).2
apply (h _ hs).isSeparatedFor.ext
intro V i hi
exact (congr_arg Subtype.val ((hG _ hs).valid_glue (G.family_of_elements_compatible s) _ hi) : _)
#align category_theory.grothendieck_topology.subpresheaf.eq_sheafify CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.Subpresheaf.eq_sheafify
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Subsheaf.lean | 216 | 255 | theorem Subpresheaf.sheafify_isSheaf (hF : Presieve.IsSheaf J F) :
Presieve.IsSheaf J (G.sheafify J).toPresheaf := by |
intro U S hS x hx
let S' := Sieve.bind S fun Y f hf => G.sieveOfSection (x f hf).1
have := fun (V) (i : V ⟶ U) (hi : S' i) => hi
-- Porting note: change to explicit variable so that `choose` can find the correct
-- dependent functions. Thus everything follows need two additional explicit variables.
choose W i₁ i₂ hi₂ h₁ h₂ using this
dsimp [-Sieve.bind_apply] at *
let x'' : Presieve.FamilyOfElements F S' := fun V i hi => F.map (i₁ V i hi).op (x _ (hi₂ V i hi))
have H : ∀ s, x.IsAmalgamation s ↔ x''.IsAmalgamation s.1 := by
intro s
constructor
· intro H V i hi
dsimp only [x'', show x'' = fun V i hi => F.map (i₁ V i hi).op (x _ (hi₂ V i hi)) from rfl]
conv_lhs => rw [← h₂ _ _ hi]
rw [← H _ (hi₂ _ _ hi)]
exact FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply F (i₂ _ _ hi).op (i₁ _ _ hi).op _
· intro H V i hi
refine Subtype.ext ?_
apply (hF _ (x i hi).2).isSeparatedFor.ext
intro V' i' hi'
have hi'' : S' (i' ≫ i) := ⟨_, _, _, hi, hi', rfl⟩
have := H _ hi''
rw [op_comp, F.map_comp] at this
exact this.trans (congr_arg Subtype.val (hx _ _ (hi₂ _ _ hi'') hi (h₂ _ _ hi'')))
have : x''.Compatible := by
intro V₁ V₂ V₃ g₁ g₂ g₃ g₄ S₁ S₂ e
rw [← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, ← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply]
exact
congr_arg Subtype.val
(hx (g₁ ≫ i₁ _ _ S₁) (g₂ ≫ i₁ _ _ S₂) (hi₂ _ _ S₁) (hi₂ _ _ S₂)
(by simp only [Category.assoc, h₂, e]))
obtain ⟨t, ht, ht'⟩ := hF _ (J.bind_covering hS fun V i hi => (x i hi).2) _ this
refine ⟨⟨t, _⟩, (H ⟨t, ?_⟩).mpr ht, fun y hy => Subtype.ext (ht' _ ((H _).mp hy))⟩
refine J.superset_covering ?_ (J.bind_covering hS fun V i hi => (x i hi).2)
intro V i hi
dsimp
rw [ht _ hi]
exact h₁ _ _ hi
|
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Connectivity
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
#align_import combinatorics.simple_graph.acyclic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b07688016d62f81d14508ff339ea3415558d6353"
universe u v
namespace SimpleGraph
open Walk
variable {V : Type u} (G : SimpleGraph V)
def IsAcyclic : Prop := ∀ ⦃v : V⦄ (c : G.Walk v v), ¬c.IsCycle
#align simple_graph.is_acyclic SimpleGraph.IsAcyclic
@[mk_iff]
structure IsTree : Prop where
protected isConnected : G.Connected
protected IsAcyclic : G.IsAcyclic
#align simple_graph.is_tree SimpleGraph.IsTree
variable {G}
@[simp] lemma isAcyclic_bot : IsAcyclic (⊥ : SimpleGraph V) := fun _a _w hw ↦ hw.ne_bot rfl
theorem isAcyclic_iff_forall_adj_isBridge :
G.IsAcyclic ↔ ∀ ⦃v w : V⦄, G.Adj v w → G.IsBridge s(v, w) := by
simp_rw [isBridge_iff_adj_and_forall_cycle_not_mem]
constructor
· intro ha v w hvw
apply And.intro hvw
intro u p hp
cases ha p hp
· rintro hb v (_ | ⟨ha, p⟩) hp
· exact hp.not_of_nil
· apply (hb ha).2 _ hp
rw [Walk.edges_cons]
apply List.mem_cons_self
#align simple_graph.is_acyclic_iff_forall_adj_is_bridge SimpleGraph.isAcyclic_iff_forall_adj_isBridge
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Acyclic.lean | 83 | 85 | theorem isAcyclic_iff_forall_edge_isBridge :
G.IsAcyclic ↔ ∀ ⦃e⦄, e ∈ (G.edgeSet) → G.IsBridge e := by |
simp [isAcyclic_iff_forall_adj_isBridge, Sym2.forall]
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Functor
#align_import category_theory.monoidal.End from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"85075bccb68ab7fa49fb05db816233fb790e4fe9"
universe v u
namespace CategoryTheory
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C]
def endofunctorMonoidalCategory : MonoidalCategory (C ⥤ C) where
tensorObj F G := F ⋙ G
whiskerLeft X _ _ F := whiskerLeft X F
whiskerRight F X := whiskerRight F X
tensorHom α β := α ◫ β
tensorUnit := 𝟭 C
associator F G H := Functor.associator F G H
leftUnitor F := Functor.leftUnitor F
rightUnitor F := Functor.rightUnitor F
#align category_theory.endofunctor_monoidal_category CategoryTheory.endofunctorMonoidalCategory
open CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory
attribute [local instance] endofunctorMonoidalCategory
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_tensorUnit_obj (X : C) :
(𝟙_ (C ⥤ C)).obj X = X := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_tensorUnit_map {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(𝟙_ (C ⥤ C)).map f = f := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_tensorObj_obj (F G : C ⥤ C) (X : C) :
(F ⊗ G).obj X = G.obj (F.obj X) := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_tensorObj_map (F G : C ⥤ C) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(F ⊗ G).map f = G.map (F.map f) := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_tensorMap_app
{F G H K : C ⥤ C} {α : F ⟶ G} {β : H ⟶ K} (X : C) :
(α ⊗ β).app X = β.app (F.obj X) ≫ K.map (α.app X) := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_whiskerLeft_app
{F H K : C ⥤ C} {β : H ⟶ K} (X : C) :
(F ◁ β).app X = β.app (F.obj X) := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_whiskerRight_app
{F G H : C ⥤ C} {α : F ⟶ G} (X : C) :
(α ▷ H).app X = H.map (α.app X) := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_associator_hom_app (F G H : C ⥤ C) (X : C) :
(α_ F G H).hom.app X = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_associator_inv_app (F G H : C ⥤ C) (X : C) :
(α_ F G H).inv.app X = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_leftUnitor_hom_app (F : C ⥤ C) (X : C) :
(λ_ F).hom.app X = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_leftUnitor_inv_app (F : C ⥤ C) (X : C) :
(λ_ F).inv.app X = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_rightUnitor_hom_app (F : C ⥤ C) (X : C) :
(ρ_ F).hom.app X = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_rightUnitor_inv_app (F : C ⥤ C) (X : C) :
(ρ_ F).inv.app X = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simps!]
def tensoringRightMonoidal [MonoidalCategory.{v} C] : MonoidalFunctor C (C ⥤ C) :=
{ tensoringRight C with
ε := (rightUnitorNatIso C).inv
μ := fun X Y => (isoWhiskerRight (curriedAssociatorNatIso C)
((evaluation C (C ⥤ C)).obj X ⋙ (evaluation C C).obj Y)).hom }
#align category_theory.tensoring_right_monoidal CategoryTheory.tensoringRightMonoidal
variable {C}
variable {M : Type*} [Category M] [MonoidalCategory M] (F : MonoidalFunctor M (C ⥤ C))
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem μ_hom_inv_app (i j : M) (X : C) : (F.μ i j).app X ≫ (F.μIso i j).inv.app X = 𝟙 _ :=
(F.μIso i j).hom_inv_id_app X
#align category_theory.μ_hom_inv_app CategoryTheory.μ_hom_inv_app
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem μ_inv_hom_app (i j : M) (X : C) : (F.μIso i j).inv.app X ≫ (F.μ i j).app X = 𝟙 _ :=
(F.μIso i j).inv_hom_id_app X
#align category_theory.μ_inv_hom_app CategoryTheory.μ_inv_hom_app
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ε_hom_inv_app (X : C) : F.ε.app X ≫ F.εIso.inv.app X = 𝟙 _ :=
F.εIso.hom_inv_id_app X
#align category_theory.ε_hom_inv_app CategoryTheory.ε_hom_inv_app
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ε_inv_hom_app (X : C) : F.εIso.inv.app X ≫ F.ε.app X = 𝟙 _ :=
F.εIso.inv_hom_id_app X
#align category_theory.ε_inv_hom_app CategoryTheory.ε_inv_hom_app
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ε_naturality {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : F.ε.app X ≫ (F.obj (𝟙_ M)).map f = f ≫ F.ε.app Y :=
(F.ε.naturality f).symm
#align category_theory.ε_naturality CategoryTheory.ε_naturality
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ε_inv_naturality {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(MonoidalFunctor.εIso F).inv.app X ≫ (𝟙_ (C ⥤ C)).map f = F.εIso.inv.app X ≫ f := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.ε_inv_naturality CategoryTheory.ε_inv_naturality
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem μ_naturality {m n : M} {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(F.obj n).map ((F.obj m).map f) ≫ (F.μ m n).app Y = (F.μ m n).app X ≫ (F.obj _).map f :=
(F.toLaxMonoidalFunctor.μ m n).naturality f
#align category_theory.μ_naturality CategoryTheory.μ_naturality
-- This is a simp lemma in the reverse direction via `NatTrans.naturality`.
@[reassoc]
theorem μ_inv_naturality {m n : M} {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(F.μIso m n).inv.app X ≫ (F.obj n).map ((F.obj m).map f) =
(F.obj _).map f ≫ (F.μIso m n).inv.app Y :=
((F.μIso m n).inv.naturality f).symm
#align category_theory.μ_inv_naturality CategoryTheory.μ_inv_naturality
-- This is not a simp lemma since it could be proved by the lemmas later.
@[reassoc]
theorem μ_naturality₂ {m n m' n' : M} (f : m ⟶ m') (g : n ⟶ n') (X : C) :
(F.map g).app ((F.obj m).obj X) ≫ (F.obj n').map ((F.map f).app X) ≫ (F.μ m' n').app X =
(F.μ m n).app X ≫ (F.map (f ⊗ g)).app X := by
have := congr_app (F.toLaxMonoidalFunctor.μ_natural f g) X
dsimp at this
simpa using this
#align category_theory.μ_naturality₂ CategoryTheory.μ_naturality₂
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem μ_naturalityₗ {m n m' : M} (f : m ⟶ m') (X : C) :
(F.obj n).map ((F.map f).app X) ≫ (F.μ m' n).app X =
(F.μ m n).app X ≫ (F.map (f ▷ n)).app X := by
rw [← tensorHom_id, ← μ_naturality₂ F f (𝟙 n) X]
simp
#align category_theory.μ_naturalityₗ CategoryTheory.μ_naturalityₗ
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem μ_naturalityᵣ {m n n' : M} (g : n ⟶ n') (X : C) :
(F.map g).app ((F.obj m).obj X) ≫ (F.μ m n').app X =
(F.μ m n).app X ≫ (F.map (m ◁ g)).app X := by
rw [← id_tensorHom, ← μ_naturality₂ F (𝟙 m) g X]
simp
#align category_theory.μ_naturalityᵣ CategoryTheory.μ_naturalityᵣ
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem μ_inv_naturalityₗ {m n m' : M} (f : m ⟶ m') (X : C) :
(F.μIso m n).inv.app X ≫ (F.obj n).map ((F.map f).app X) =
(F.map (f ▷ n)).app X ≫ (F.μIso m' n).inv.app X := by
rw [← IsIso.comp_inv_eq, Category.assoc, ← IsIso.eq_inv_comp]
simp
#align category_theory.μ_inv_naturalityₗ CategoryTheory.μ_inv_naturalityₗ
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem μ_inv_naturalityᵣ {m n n' : M} (g : n ⟶ n') (X : C) :
(F.μIso m n).inv.app X ≫ (F.map g).app ((F.obj m).obj X) =
(F.map (m ◁ g)).app X ≫ (F.μIso m n').inv.app X := by
rw [← IsIso.comp_inv_eq, Category.assoc, ← IsIso.eq_inv_comp]
simp
#align category_theory.μ_inv_naturalityᵣ CategoryTheory.μ_inv_naturalityᵣ
@[reassoc]
theorem left_unitality_app (n : M) (X : C) :
(F.obj n).map (F.ε.app X) ≫ (F.μ (𝟙_ M) n).app X ≫ (F.map (λ_ n).hom).app X = 𝟙 _ := by
have := congr_app (F.toLaxMonoidalFunctor.left_unitality n) X
dsimp at this
simpa using this.symm
#align category_theory.left_unitality_app CategoryTheory.left_unitality_app
-- Porting note: linter claims `simp can prove it`, but cnot
@[reassoc (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem obj_ε_app (n : M) (X : C) :
(F.obj n).map (F.ε.app X) = (F.map (λ_ n).inv).app X ≫ (F.μIso (𝟙_ M) n).inv.app X := by
refine Eq.trans ?_ (Category.id_comp _)
rw [← Category.assoc, ← IsIso.comp_inv_eq, ← IsIso.comp_inv_eq, Category.assoc]
convert left_unitality_app F n X
· simp
· simp
#align category_theory.obj_ε_app CategoryTheory.obj_ε_app
-- Porting note: linter claims `simp can prove it`, but cnot
@[reassoc (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem obj_ε_inv_app (n : M) (X : C) :
(F.obj n).map (F.εIso.inv.app X) = (F.μ (𝟙_ M) n).app X ≫ (F.map (λ_ n).hom).app X := by
rw [← cancel_mono ((F.obj n).map (F.ε.app X)), ← Functor.map_comp]
simp
#align category_theory.obj_ε_inv_app CategoryTheory.obj_ε_inv_app
@[reassoc]
theorem right_unitality_app (n : M) (X : C) :
F.ε.app ((F.obj n).obj X) ≫ (F.μ n (𝟙_ M)).app X ≫ (F.map (ρ_ n).hom).app X = 𝟙 _ := by
have := congr_app (F.toLaxMonoidalFunctor.right_unitality n) X
dsimp at this
simpa using this.symm
#align category_theory.right_unitality_app CategoryTheory.right_unitality_app
@[simp]
theorem ε_app_obj (n : M) (X : C) :
F.ε.app ((F.obj n).obj X) = (F.map (ρ_ n).inv).app X ≫ (F.μIso n (𝟙_ M)).inv.app X := by
refine Eq.trans ?_ (Category.id_comp _)
rw [← Category.assoc, ← IsIso.comp_inv_eq, ← IsIso.comp_inv_eq, Category.assoc]
convert right_unitality_app F n X using 1
simp
#align category_theory.ε_app_obj CategoryTheory.ε_app_obj
@[simp]
theorem ε_inv_app_obj (n : M) (X : C) :
F.εIso.inv.app ((F.obj n).obj X) = (F.μ n (𝟙_ M)).app X ≫ (F.map (ρ_ n).hom).app X := by
rw [← cancel_mono (F.ε.app ((F.obj n).obj X)), ε_inv_hom_app]
simp
#align category_theory.ε_inv_app_obj CategoryTheory.ε_inv_app_obj
@[reassoc]
theorem associativity_app (m₁ m₂ m₃ : M) (X : C) :
(F.obj m₃).map ((F.μ m₁ m₂).app X) ≫
(F.μ (m₁ ⊗ m₂) m₃).app X ≫ (F.map (α_ m₁ m₂ m₃).hom).app X =
(F.μ m₂ m₃).app ((F.obj m₁).obj X) ≫ (F.μ m₁ (m₂ ⊗ m₃)).app X := by
have := congr_app (F.toLaxMonoidalFunctor.associativity m₁ m₂ m₃) X
dsimp at this
simpa using this
#align category_theory.associativity_app CategoryTheory.associativity_app
-- Porting note: linter claims `simp can prove it`, but cnot
@[reassoc (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem obj_μ_app (m₁ m₂ m₃ : M) (X : C) :
(F.obj m₃).map ((F.μ m₁ m₂).app X) =
(F.μ m₂ m₃).app ((F.obj m₁).obj X) ≫
(F.μ m₁ (m₂ ⊗ m₃)).app X ≫
(F.map (α_ m₁ m₂ m₃).inv).app X ≫ (F.μIso (m₁ ⊗ m₂) m₃).inv.app X := by
rw [← associativity_app_assoc]
simp
#align category_theory.obj_μ_app CategoryTheory.obj_μ_app
-- Porting note: linter claims `simp can prove it`, but cnot
@[reassoc (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem obj_μ_inv_app (m₁ m₂ m₃ : M) (X : C) :
(F.obj m₃).map ((F.μIso m₁ m₂).inv.app X) =
(F.μ (m₁ ⊗ m₂) m₃).app X ≫
(F.map (α_ m₁ m₂ m₃).hom).app X ≫
(F.μIso m₁ (m₂ ⊗ m₃)).inv.app X ≫ (F.μIso m₂ m₃).inv.app ((F.obj m₁).obj X) := by
rw [← IsIso.inv_eq_inv]
convert obj_μ_app F m₁ m₂ m₃ X using 1
· refine IsIso.inv_eq_of_hom_inv_id ?_
rw [← Functor.map_comp]
simp
· simp only [MonoidalFunctor.μIso_hom, Category.assoc, NatIso.inv_inv_app, IsIso.inv_comp]
congr
· refine IsIso.inv_eq_of_hom_inv_id ?_
simp
· refine IsIso.inv_eq_of_hom_inv_id ?_
simp
#align category_theory.obj_μ_inv_app CategoryTheory.obj_μ_inv_app
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem obj_zero_map_μ_app {m : M} {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ (F.obj m).obj Y) :
(F.obj (𝟙_ M)).map f ≫ (F.μ m (𝟙_ M)).app _ =
F.εIso.inv.app _ ≫ f ≫ (F.map (ρ_ m).inv).app _ := by
rw [← IsIso.inv_comp_eq, ← IsIso.comp_inv_eq]
simp
#align category_theory.obj_zero_map_μ_app CategoryTheory.obj_zero_map_μ_app
@[simp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/End.lean | 291 | 297 | theorem obj_μ_zero_app (m₁ m₂ : M) (X : C) :
(F.μ (𝟙_ M) m₂).app ((F.obj m₁).obj X) ≫ (F.μ m₁ (𝟙_ M ⊗ m₂)).app X ≫
(F.map (α_ m₁ (𝟙_ M) m₂).inv).app X ≫ (F.μIso (m₁ ⊗ 𝟙_ M) m₂).inv.app X =
(F.μ (𝟙_ M) m₂).app ((F.obj m₁).obj X) ≫
(F.map (λ_ m₂).hom).app ((F.obj m₁).obj X) ≫ (F.obj m₂).map ((F.map (ρ_ m₁).inv).app X) := by |
rw [← obj_ε_inv_app_assoc, ← Functor.map_comp]
simp
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.AsymptoticEquivalent
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.AffineIsometry
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.NormedSpace
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.RieszLemma
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.FiniteDimension
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Module
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Matrix
#align_import analysis.normed_space.finite_dimension from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9425b6f8220e53b059f5a4904786c3c4b50fc057"
universe u v w x
noncomputable section
open Set FiniteDimensional TopologicalSpace Filter Asymptotics Classical Topology
NNReal Metric
section CompleteField
variable {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type v} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {F : Type w} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] {F' : Type x}
[AddCommGroup F'] [Module 𝕜 F'] [TopologicalSpace F'] [TopologicalAddGroup F']
[ContinuousSMul 𝕜 F'] [CompleteSpace 𝕜]
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.continuous_det : Continuous fun f : E →L[𝕜] E => f.det := by
change Continuous fun f : E →L[𝕜] E => LinearMap.det (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] E)
-- Porting note: this could be easier with `det_cases`
by_cases h : ∃ s : Finset E, Nonempty (Basis (↥s) 𝕜 E)
· rcases h with ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩
haveI : FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E := FiniteDimensional.of_fintype_basis b
simp_rw [LinearMap.det_eq_det_toMatrix_of_finset b]
refine Continuous.matrix_det ?_
exact
((LinearMap.toMatrix b b).toLinearMap.comp
(ContinuousLinearMap.coeLM 𝕜)).continuous_of_finiteDimensional
· -- Porting note: was `unfold LinearMap.det`
rw [LinearMap.det_def]
simpa only [h, MonoidHom.one_apply, dif_neg, not_false_iff] using continuous_const
#align continuous_linear_map.continuous_det ContinuousLinearMap.continuous_det
irreducible_def lipschitzExtensionConstant (E' : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace ℝ E']
[FiniteDimensional ℝ E'] : ℝ≥0 :=
let A := (Basis.ofVectorSpace ℝ E').equivFun.toContinuousLinearEquiv
max (‖A.symm.toContinuousLinearMap‖₊ * ‖A.toContinuousLinearMap‖₊) 1
#align lipschitz_extension_constant lipschitzExtensionConstant
theorem lipschitzExtensionConstant_pos (E' : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace ℝ E']
[FiniteDimensional ℝ E'] : 0 < lipschitzExtensionConstant E' := by
rw [lipschitzExtensionConstant]
exact zero_lt_one.trans_le (le_max_right _ _)
#align lipschitz_extension_constant_pos lipschitzExtensionConstant_pos
theorem LipschitzOnWith.extend_finite_dimension {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] {E' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace ℝ E'] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E'] {s : Set α} {f : α → E'}
{K : ℝ≥0} (hf : LipschitzOnWith K f s) :
∃ g : α → E', LipschitzWith (lipschitzExtensionConstant E' * K) g ∧ EqOn f g s := by
let ι : Type _ := Basis.ofVectorSpaceIndex ℝ E'
let A := (Basis.ofVectorSpace ℝ E').equivFun.toContinuousLinearEquiv
have LA : LipschitzWith ‖A.toContinuousLinearMap‖₊ A := by apply A.lipschitz
have L : LipschitzOnWith (‖A.toContinuousLinearMap‖₊ * K) (A ∘ f) s :=
LA.comp_lipschitzOnWith hf
obtain ⟨g, hg, gs⟩ :
∃ g : α → ι → ℝ, LipschitzWith (‖A.toContinuousLinearMap‖₊ * K) g ∧ EqOn (A ∘ f) g s :=
L.extend_pi
refine ⟨A.symm ∘ g, ?_, ?_⟩
· have LAsymm : LipschitzWith ‖A.symm.toContinuousLinearMap‖₊ A.symm := by
apply A.symm.lipschitz
apply (LAsymm.comp hg).weaken
rw [lipschitzExtensionConstant, ← mul_assoc]
exact mul_le_mul' (le_max_left _ _) le_rfl
· intro x hx
have : A (f x) = g x := gs hx
simp only [(· ∘ ·), ← this, A.symm_apply_apply]
#align lipschitz_on_with.extend_finite_dimension LipschitzOnWith.extend_finite_dimension
theorem LinearMap.exists_antilipschitzWith [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E] (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F)
(hf : LinearMap.ker f = ⊥) : ∃ K > 0, AntilipschitzWith K f := by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial E
· exact ⟨1, zero_lt_one, AntilipschitzWith.of_subsingleton⟩
· rw [LinearMap.ker_eq_bot] at hf
let e : E ≃L[𝕜] LinearMap.range f := (LinearEquiv.ofInjective f hf).toContinuousLinearEquiv
exact ⟨_, e.nnnorm_symm_pos, e.antilipschitz⟩
#align linear_map.exists_antilipschitz_with LinearMap.exists_antilipschitzWith
open Function in
theorem LinearMap.injective_iff_antilipschitz [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E] (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
Injective f ↔ ∃ K > 0, AntilipschitzWith K f := by
constructor
· rw [← LinearMap.ker_eq_bot]
exact f.exists_antilipschitzWith
· rintro ⟨K, -, H⟩
exact H.injective
open Function in
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.isOpen_injective [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E] :
IsOpen { L : E →L[𝕜] F | Injective L } := by
rw [isOpen_iff_eventually]
rintro φ₀ hφ₀
rcases φ₀.injective_iff_antilipschitz.mp hφ₀ with ⟨K, K_pos, H⟩
have : ∀ᶠ φ in 𝓝 φ₀, ‖φ - φ₀‖₊ < K⁻¹ := eventually_nnnorm_sub_lt _ <| inv_pos_of_pos K_pos
filter_upwards [this] with φ hφ
apply φ.injective_iff_antilipschitz.mpr
exact ⟨(K⁻¹ - ‖φ - φ₀‖₊)⁻¹, inv_pos_of_pos (tsub_pos_of_lt hφ),
H.add_sub_lipschitzWith (φ - φ₀).lipschitz hφ⟩
protected theorem LinearIndependent.eventually {ι} [Finite ι] {f : ι → E}
(hf : LinearIndependent 𝕜 f) : ∀ᶠ g in 𝓝 f, LinearIndependent 𝕜 g := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
simp only [Fintype.linearIndependent_iff'] at hf ⊢
rcases LinearMap.exists_antilipschitzWith _ hf with ⟨K, K0, hK⟩
have : Tendsto (fun g : ι → E => ∑ i, ‖g i - f i‖) (𝓝 f) (𝓝 <| ∑ i, ‖f i - f i‖) :=
tendsto_finset_sum _ fun i _ =>
Tendsto.norm <| ((continuous_apply i).tendsto _).sub tendsto_const_nhds
simp only [sub_self, norm_zero, Finset.sum_const_zero] at this
refine (this.eventually (gt_mem_nhds <| inv_pos.2 K0)).mono fun g hg => ?_
replace hg : ∑ i, ‖g i - f i‖₊ < K⁻¹ := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_lt_coe]
push_cast
exact hg
rw [LinearMap.ker_eq_bot]
refine (hK.add_sub_lipschitzWith (LipschitzWith.of_dist_le_mul fun v u => ?_) hg).injective
simp only [dist_eq_norm, LinearMap.lsum_apply, Pi.sub_apply, LinearMap.sum_apply,
LinearMap.comp_apply, LinearMap.proj_apply, LinearMap.smulRight_apply, LinearMap.id_apply, ←
Finset.sum_sub_distrib, ← smul_sub, ← sub_smul, NNReal.coe_sum, coe_nnnorm, Finset.sum_mul]
refine norm_sum_le_of_le _ fun i _ => ?_
rw [norm_smul, mul_comm]
gcongr
exact norm_le_pi_norm (v - u) i
#align linear_independent.eventually LinearIndependent.eventually
theorem isOpen_setOf_linearIndependent {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] :
IsOpen { f : ι → E | LinearIndependent 𝕜 f } :=
isOpen_iff_mem_nhds.2 fun _ => LinearIndependent.eventually
#align is_open_set_of_linear_independent isOpen_setOf_linearIndependent
theorem isOpen_setOf_nat_le_rank (n : ℕ) :
IsOpen { f : E →L[𝕜] F | ↑n ≤ (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F).rank } := by
simp only [LinearMap.le_rank_iff_exists_linearIndependent_finset, setOf_exists, ← exists_prop]
refine isOpen_biUnion fun t _ => ?_
have : Continuous fun f : E →L[𝕜] F => fun x : (t : Set E) => f x :=
continuous_pi fun x => (ContinuousLinearMap.apply 𝕜 F (x : E)).continuous
exact isOpen_setOf_linearIndependent.preimage this
#align is_open_set_of_nat_le_rank isOpen_setOf_nat_le_rank
theorem Basis.opNNNorm_le {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (v : Basis ι 𝕜 E) {u : E →L[𝕜] F} (M : ℝ≥0)
(hu : ∀ i, ‖u (v i)‖₊ ≤ M) : ‖u‖₊ ≤ Fintype.card ι • ‖v.equivFunL.toContinuousLinearMap‖₊ * M :=
u.opNNNorm_le_bound _ fun e => by
set φ := v.equivFunL.toContinuousLinearMap
calc
‖u e‖₊ = ‖u (∑ i, v.equivFun e i • v i)‖₊ := by rw [v.sum_equivFun]
_ = ‖∑ i, v.equivFun e i • (u <| v i)‖₊ := by simp [map_sum, LinearMap.map_smul]
_ ≤ ∑ i, ‖v.equivFun e i • (u <| v i)‖₊ := nnnorm_sum_le _ _
_ = ∑ i, ‖v.equivFun e i‖₊ * ‖u (v i)‖₊ := by simp only [nnnorm_smul]
_ ≤ ∑ i, ‖v.equivFun e i‖₊ * M := by gcongr; apply hu
_ = (∑ i, ‖v.equivFun e i‖₊) * M := by rw [Finset.sum_mul]
_ ≤ Fintype.card ι • (‖φ‖₊ * ‖e‖₊) * M := by
gcongr
calc
∑ i, ‖v.equivFun e i‖₊ ≤ Fintype.card ι • ‖φ e‖₊ := Pi.sum_nnnorm_apply_le_nnnorm _
_ ≤ Fintype.card ι • (‖φ‖₊ * ‖e‖₊) := nsmul_le_nsmul_right (φ.le_opNNNorm e) _
_ = Fintype.card ι • ‖φ‖₊ * M * ‖e‖₊ := by simp only [smul_mul_assoc, mul_right_comm]
#align basis.op_nnnorm_le Basis.opNNNorm_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias Basis.op_nnnorm_le := Basis.opNNNorm_le
theorem Basis.opNorm_le {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (v : Basis ι 𝕜 E) {u : E →L[𝕜] F} {M : ℝ}
(hM : 0 ≤ M) (hu : ∀ i, ‖u (v i)‖ ≤ M) :
‖u‖ ≤ Fintype.card ι • ‖v.equivFunL.toContinuousLinearMap‖ * M := by
simpa using NNReal.coe_le_coe.mpr (v.opNNNorm_le ⟨M, hM⟩ hu)
#align basis.op_norm_le Basis.opNorm_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias Basis.op_norm_le := Basis.opNorm_le
theorem Basis.exists_opNNNorm_le {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] (v : Basis ι 𝕜 E) :
∃ C > (0 : ℝ≥0), ∀ {u : E →L[𝕜] F} (M : ℝ≥0), (∀ i, ‖u (v i)‖₊ ≤ M) → ‖u‖₊ ≤ C * M := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
exact
⟨max (Fintype.card ι • ‖v.equivFunL.toContinuousLinearMap‖₊) 1,
zero_lt_one.trans_le (le_max_right _ _), fun {u} M hu =>
(v.opNNNorm_le M hu).trans <| mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_max_left _ _) (zero_le M)⟩
#align basis.exists_op_nnnorm_le Basis.exists_opNNNorm_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias Basis.exists_op_nnnorm_le := Basis.exists_opNNNorm_le
theorem Basis.exists_opNorm_le {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] (v : Basis ι 𝕜 E) :
∃ C > (0 : ℝ), ∀ {u : E →L[𝕜] F} {M : ℝ}, 0 ≤ M → (∀ i, ‖u (v i)‖ ≤ M) → ‖u‖ ≤ C * M := by
obtain ⟨C, hC, h⟩ := v.exists_opNNNorm_le (F := F)
-- Porting note: used `Subtype.forall'` below
refine ⟨C, hC, ?_⟩
intro u M hM H
simpa using h ⟨M, hM⟩ H
#align basis.exists_op_norm_le Basis.exists_opNorm_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias Basis.exists_op_norm_le := Basis.exists_opNorm_le
instance [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E] [SecondCountableTopology F] :
SecondCountableTopology (E →L[𝕜] F) := by
set d := FiniteDimensional.finrank 𝕜 E
suffices
∀ ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃ n : (E →L[𝕜] F) → Fin d → ℕ, ∀ f g : E →L[𝕜] F, n f = n g → dist f g ≤ ε from
Metric.secondCountable_of_countable_discretization fun ε ε_pos =>
⟨Fin d → ℕ, by infer_instance, this ε ε_pos⟩
intro ε ε_pos
obtain ⟨u : ℕ → F, hu : DenseRange u⟩ := exists_dense_seq F
let v := FiniteDimensional.finBasis 𝕜 E
obtain
⟨C : ℝ, C_pos : 0 < C, hC :
∀ {φ : E →L[𝕜] F} {M : ℝ}, 0 ≤ M → (∀ i, ‖φ (v i)‖ ≤ M) → ‖φ‖ ≤ C * M⟩ :=
v.exists_opNorm_le (E := E) (F := F)
have h_2C : 0 < 2 * C := mul_pos zero_lt_two C_pos
have hε2C : 0 < ε / (2 * C) := div_pos ε_pos h_2C
have : ∀ φ : E →L[𝕜] F, ∃ n : Fin d → ℕ, ‖φ - (v.constrL <| u ∘ n)‖ ≤ ε / 2 := by
intro φ
have : ∀ i, ∃ n, ‖φ (v i) - u n‖ ≤ ε / (2 * C) := by
simp only [norm_sub_rev]
intro i
have : φ (v i) ∈ closure (range u) := hu _
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, ‖u n - φ (v i)‖ < ε / (2 * C) := by
rw [mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis Metric.nhds_basis_ball] at this
specialize this (ε / (2 * C)) hε2C
simpa [dist_eq_norm]
exact ⟨n, le_of_lt hn⟩
choose n hn using this
use n
replace hn : ∀ i : Fin d, ‖(φ - (v.constrL <| u ∘ n)) (v i)‖ ≤ ε / (2 * C) := by simp [hn]
have : C * (ε / (2 * C)) = ε / 2 := by
rw [eq_div_iff (two_ne_zero : (2 : ℝ) ≠ 0), mul_comm, ← mul_assoc,
mul_div_cancel₀ _ (ne_of_gt h_2C)]
specialize hC (le_of_lt hε2C) hn
rwa [this] at hC
choose n hn using this
set Φ := fun φ : E →L[𝕜] F => v.constrL <| u ∘ n φ
change ∀ z, dist z (Φ z) ≤ ε / 2 at hn
use n
intro x y hxy
calc
dist x y ≤ dist x (Φ x) + dist (Φ x) y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ = dist x (Φ x) + dist y (Φ y) := by simp [Φ, hxy, dist_comm]
_ ≤ ε := by linarith [hn x, hn y]
theorem AffineSubspace.closed_of_finiteDimensional {P : Type*} [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor E P] (s : AffineSubspace 𝕜 P) [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 s.direction] :
IsClosed (s : Set P) :=
s.isClosed_direction_iff.mp s.direction.closed_of_finiteDimensional
#align affine_subspace.closed_of_finite_dimensional AffineSubspace.closed_of_finiteDimensional
section Riesz
theorem exists_norm_le_le_norm_sub_of_finset {c : 𝕜} (hc : 1 < ‖c‖) {R : ℝ} (hR : ‖c‖ < R)
(h : ¬FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E) (s : Finset E) : ∃ x : E, ‖x‖ ≤ R ∧ ∀ y ∈ s, 1 ≤ ‖y - x‖ := by
let F := Submodule.span 𝕜 (s : Set E)
haveI : FiniteDimensional 𝕜 F :=
Module.finite_def.2
((Submodule.fg_top _).2 (Submodule.fg_def.2 ⟨s, Finset.finite_toSet _, rfl⟩))
have Fclosed : IsClosed (F : Set E) := Submodule.closed_of_finiteDimensional _
have : ∃ x, x ∉ F := by
contrapose! h
have : (⊤ : Submodule 𝕜 E) = F := by
ext x
simp [h]
have : FiniteDimensional 𝕜 (⊤ : Submodule 𝕜 E) := by rwa [this]
exact Module.finite_def.2 ((Submodule.fg_top _).1 (Module.finite_def.1 this))
obtain ⟨x, xR, hx⟩ : ∃ x : E, ‖x‖ ≤ R ∧ ∀ y : E, y ∈ F → 1 ≤ ‖x - y‖ :=
riesz_lemma_of_norm_lt hc hR Fclosed this
have hx' : ∀ y : E, y ∈ F → 1 ≤ ‖y - x‖ := by
intro y hy
rw [← norm_neg]
simpa using hx y hy
exact ⟨x, xR, fun y hy => hx' _ (Submodule.subset_span hy)⟩
#align exists_norm_le_le_norm_sub_of_finset exists_norm_le_le_norm_sub_of_finset
theorem exists_seq_norm_le_one_le_norm_sub' {c : 𝕜} (hc : 1 < ‖c‖) {R : ℝ} (hR : ‖c‖ < R)
(h : ¬FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E) :
∃ f : ℕ → E, (∀ n, ‖f n‖ ≤ R) ∧ Pairwise fun m n => 1 ≤ ‖f m - f n‖ := by
have : IsSymm E fun x y : E => 1 ≤ ‖x - y‖ := by
constructor
intro x y hxy
rw [← norm_neg]
simpa
apply
exists_seq_of_forall_finset_exists' (fun x : E => ‖x‖ ≤ R) fun (x : E) (y : E) => 1 ≤ ‖x - y‖
rintro s -
exact exists_norm_le_le_norm_sub_of_finset hc hR h s
#align exists_seq_norm_le_one_le_norm_sub' exists_seq_norm_le_one_le_norm_sub'
theorem exists_seq_norm_le_one_le_norm_sub (h : ¬FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E) :
∃ (R : ℝ) (f : ℕ → E), 1 < R ∧ (∀ n, ‖f n‖ ≤ R) ∧ Pairwise fun m n => 1 ≤ ‖f m - f n‖ := by
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ : ∃ c : 𝕜, 1 < ‖c‖ := NormedField.exists_one_lt_norm 𝕜
have A : ‖c‖ < ‖c‖ + 1 := by linarith
rcases exists_seq_norm_le_one_le_norm_sub' hc A h with ⟨f, hf⟩
exact ⟨‖c‖ + 1, f, hc.trans A, hf.1, hf.2⟩
#align exists_seq_norm_le_one_le_norm_sub exists_seq_norm_le_one_le_norm_sub
variable (𝕜)
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/FiniteDimension.lean | 456 | 488 | theorem FiniteDimensional.of_isCompact_closedBall₀ {r : ℝ} (rpos : 0 < r)
(h : IsCompact (Metric.closedBall (0 : E) r)) : FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E := by |
by_contra hfin
obtain ⟨R, f, Rgt, fle, lef⟩ :
∃ (R : ℝ) (f : ℕ → E), 1 < R ∧ (∀ n, ‖f n‖ ≤ R) ∧ Pairwise fun m n => 1 ≤ ‖f m - f n‖ :=
exists_seq_norm_le_one_le_norm_sub hfin
have rRpos : 0 < r / R := div_pos rpos (zero_lt_one.trans Rgt)
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ : ∃ c : 𝕜, 0 < ‖c‖ ∧ ‖c‖ < r / R := NormedField.exists_norm_lt _ rRpos
let g := fun n : ℕ => c • f n
have A : ∀ n, g n ∈ Metric.closedBall (0 : E) r := by
intro n
simp only [g, norm_smul, dist_zero_right, Metric.mem_closedBall]
calc
‖c‖ * ‖f n‖ ≤ r / R * R := by
gcongr
· exact hc.2.le
· apply fle
_ = r := by field_simp [(zero_lt_one.trans Rgt).ne']
-- Porting note: moved type ascriptions because of exists_prop changes
obtain ⟨x : E, _ : x ∈ Metric.closedBall (0 : E) r, φ : ℕ → ℕ, φmono : StrictMono φ,
φlim : Tendsto (g ∘ φ) atTop (𝓝 x)⟩ := h.tendsto_subseq A
have B : CauchySeq (g ∘ φ) := φlim.cauchySeq
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ : ∃ N : ℕ, ∀ n : ℕ, N ≤ n → dist ((g ∘ φ) n) ((g ∘ φ) N) < ‖c‖ :=
Metric.cauchySeq_iff'.1 B ‖c‖ hc.1
apply lt_irrefl ‖c‖
calc
‖c‖ ≤ dist (g (φ (N + 1))) (g (φ N)) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← mul_one ‖c‖]
simp only [g, dist_eq_norm, ← smul_sub, norm_smul]
gcongr
apply lef (ne_of_gt _)
exact φmono (Nat.lt_succ_self N)
_ < ‖c‖ := hN (N + 1) (Nat.le_succ N)
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Support
#align_import algebra.indicator_function from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2445c98ae4b87eabebdde552593519b9b6dc350c"
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Function
variable {α β ι M N : Type*}
namespace Set
section One
variable [One M] [One N] {s t : Set α} {f g : α → M} {a : α}
@[to_additive "`Set.indicator s f a` is `f a` if `a ∈ s`, `0` otherwise."]
noncomputable def mulIndicator (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (x : α) : M :=
haveI := Classical.decPred (· ∈ s)
if x ∈ s then f x else 1
#align set.mul_indicator Set.mulIndicator
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem piecewise_eq_mulIndicator [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] : s.piecewise f 1 = s.mulIndicator f :=
funext fun _ => @if_congr _ _ _ _ (id _) _ _ _ _ Iff.rfl rfl rfl
#align set.piecewise_eq_mul_indicator Set.piecewise_eq_mulIndicator
#align set.piecewise_eq_indicator Set.piecewise_eq_indicator
-- Porting note: needed unfold for mulIndicator
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_apply (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (a : α) [Decidable (a ∈ s)] :
mulIndicator s f a = if a ∈ s then f a else 1 := by
unfold mulIndicator
congr
#align set.mul_indicator_apply Set.mulIndicator_apply
#align set.indicator_apply Set.indicator_apply
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) (f : α → M) : mulIndicator s f a = f a :=
if_pos h
#align set.mul_indicator_of_mem Set.mulIndicator_of_mem
#align set.indicator_of_mem Set.indicator_of_mem
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) (f : α → M) : mulIndicator s f a = 1 :=
if_neg h
#align set.mul_indicator_of_not_mem Set.mulIndicator_of_not_mem
#align set.indicator_of_not_mem Set.indicator_of_not_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_one_or_self (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (a : α) :
mulIndicator s f a = 1 ∨ mulIndicator s f a = f a := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· exact Or.inr (mulIndicator_of_mem h f)
· exact Or.inl (mulIndicator_of_not_mem h f)
#align set.mul_indicator_eq_one_or_self Set.mulIndicator_eq_one_or_self
#align set.indicator_eq_zero_or_self Set.indicator_eq_zero_or_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_apply_eq_self : s.mulIndicator f a = f a ↔ a ∉ s → f a = 1 :=
letI := Classical.dec (a ∈ s)
ite_eq_left_iff.trans (by rw [@eq_comm _ (f a)])
#align set.mul_indicator_apply_eq_self Set.mulIndicator_apply_eq_self
#align set.indicator_apply_eq_self Set.indicator_apply_eq_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_self : s.mulIndicator f = f ↔ mulSupport f ⊆ s := by
simp only [funext_iff, subset_def, mem_mulSupport, mulIndicator_apply_eq_self, not_imp_comm]
#align set.mul_indicator_eq_self Set.mulIndicator_eq_self
#align set.indicator_eq_self Set.indicator_eq_self
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_self_of_superset (h1 : s.mulIndicator f = f) (h2 : s ⊆ t) :
t.mulIndicator f = f := by
rw [mulIndicator_eq_self] at h1 ⊢
exact Subset.trans h1 h2
#align set.mul_indicator_eq_self_of_superset Set.mulIndicator_eq_self_of_superset
#align set.indicator_eq_self_of_superset Set.indicator_eq_self_of_superset
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_apply_eq_one : mulIndicator s f a = 1 ↔ a ∈ s → f a = 1 :=
letI := Classical.dec (a ∈ s)
ite_eq_right_iff
#align set.mul_indicator_apply_eq_one Set.mulIndicator_apply_eq_one
#align set.indicator_apply_eq_zero Set.indicator_apply_eq_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_one : (mulIndicator s f = fun x => 1) ↔ Disjoint (mulSupport f) s := by
simp only [funext_iff, mulIndicator_apply_eq_one, Set.disjoint_left, mem_mulSupport,
not_imp_not]
#align set.mul_indicator_eq_one Set.mulIndicator_eq_one
#align set.indicator_eq_zero Set.indicator_eq_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_one' : mulIndicator s f = 1 ↔ Disjoint (mulSupport f) s :=
mulIndicator_eq_one
#align set.mul_indicator_eq_one' Set.mulIndicator_eq_one'
#align set.indicator_eq_zero' Set.indicator_eq_zero'
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_apply_ne_one {a : α} : s.mulIndicator f a ≠ 1 ↔ a ∈ s ∩ mulSupport f := by
simp only [Ne, mulIndicator_apply_eq_one, Classical.not_imp, mem_inter_iff, mem_mulSupport]
#align set.mul_indicator_apply_ne_one Set.mulIndicator_apply_ne_one
#align set.indicator_apply_ne_zero Set.indicator_apply_ne_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSupport_mulIndicator :
Function.mulSupport (s.mulIndicator f) = s ∩ Function.mulSupport f :=
ext fun x => by simp [Function.mem_mulSupport, mulIndicator_apply_eq_one]
#align set.mul_support_mul_indicator Set.mulSupport_mulIndicator
#align set.support_indicator Set.support_indicator
@[to_additive
"If an additive indicator function is not equal to `0` at a point, then that point is
in the set."]
theorem mem_of_mulIndicator_ne_one (h : mulIndicator s f a ≠ 1) : a ∈ s :=
not_imp_comm.1 (fun hn => mulIndicator_of_not_mem hn f) h
#align set.mem_of_mul_indicator_ne_one Set.mem_of_mulIndicator_ne_one
#align set.mem_of_indicator_ne_zero Set.mem_of_indicator_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem eqOn_mulIndicator : EqOn (mulIndicator s f) f s := fun _ hx => mulIndicator_of_mem hx f
#align set.eq_on_mul_indicator Set.eqOn_mulIndicator
#align set.eq_on_indicator Set.eqOn_indicator
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_mulIndicator_subset : mulSupport (s.mulIndicator f) ⊆ s := fun _ hx =>
hx.imp_symm fun h => mulIndicator_of_not_mem h f
#align set.mul_support_mul_indicator_subset Set.mulSupport_mulIndicator_subset
#align set.support_indicator_subset Set.support_indicator_subset
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_mulSupport : mulIndicator (mulSupport f) f = f :=
mulIndicator_eq_self.2 Subset.rfl
#align set.mul_indicator_mul_support Set.mulIndicator_mulSupport
#align set.indicator_support Set.indicator_support
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_range_comp {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → α) (g : α → M) :
mulIndicator (range f) g ∘ f = g ∘ f :=
letI := Classical.decPred (· ∈ range f)
piecewise_range_comp _ _ _
#align set.mul_indicator_range_comp Set.mulIndicator_range_comp
#align set.indicator_range_comp Set.indicator_range_comp
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_congr (h : EqOn f g s) : mulIndicator s f = mulIndicator s g :=
funext fun x => by
simp only [mulIndicator]
split_ifs with h_1
· exact h h_1
rfl
#align set.mul_indicator_congr Set.mulIndicator_congr
#align set.indicator_congr Set.indicator_congr
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_univ (f : α → M) : mulIndicator (univ : Set α) f = f :=
mulIndicator_eq_self.2 <| subset_univ _
#align set.mul_indicator_univ Set.mulIndicator_univ
#align set.indicator_univ Set.indicator_univ
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_empty (f : α → M) : mulIndicator (∅ : Set α) f = fun _ => 1 :=
mulIndicator_eq_one.2 <| disjoint_empty _
#align set.mul_indicator_empty Set.mulIndicator_empty
#align set.indicator_empty Set.indicator_empty
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_empty' (f : α → M) : mulIndicator (∅ : Set α) f = 1 :=
mulIndicator_empty f
#align set.mul_indicator_empty' Set.mulIndicator_empty'
#align set.indicator_empty' Set.indicator_empty'
variable (M)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_one (s : Set α) : (mulIndicator s fun _ => (1 : M)) = fun _ => (1 : M) :=
mulIndicator_eq_one.2 <| by simp only [mulSupport_one, empty_disjoint]
#align set.mul_indicator_one Set.mulIndicator_one
#align set.indicator_zero Set.indicator_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_one' {s : Set α} : s.mulIndicator (1 : α → M) = 1 :=
mulIndicator_one M s
#align set.mul_indicator_one' Set.mulIndicator_one'
#align set.indicator_zero' Set.indicator_zero'
variable {M}
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → M) :
mulIndicator s (mulIndicator t f) = mulIndicator (s ∩ t) f :=
funext fun x => by
simp only [mulIndicator]
split_ifs <;> simp_all (config := { contextual := true })
#align set.mul_indicator_mul_indicator Set.mulIndicator_mulIndicator
#align set.indicator_indicator Set.indicator_indicator
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_inter_mulSupport (s : Set α) (f : α → M) :
mulIndicator (s ∩ mulSupport f) f = mulIndicator s f := by
rw [← mulIndicator_mulIndicator, mulIndicator_mulSupport]
#align set.mul_indicator_inter_mul_support Set.mulIndicator_inter_mulSupport
#align set.indicator_inter_support Set.indicator_inter_support
@[to_additive]
theorem comp_mulIndicator (h : M → β) (f : α → M) {s : Set α} {x : α} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] :
h (s.mulIndicator f x) = s.piecewise (h ∘ f) (const α (h 1)) x := by
letI := Classical.decPred (· ∈ s)
convert s.apply_piecewise f (const α 1) (fun _ => h) (x := x) using 2
#align set.comp_mul_indicator Set.comp_mulIndicator
#align set.comp_indicator Set.comp_indicator
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_comp_right {s : Set α} (f : β → α) {g : α → M} {x : β} :
mulIndicator (f ⁻¹' s) (g ∘ f) x = mulIndicator s g (f x) := by
simp only [mulIndicator, Function.comp]
split_ifs with h h' h'' <;> first | rfl | contradiction
#align set.mul_indicator_comp_right Set.mulIndicator_comp_right
#align set.indicator_comp_right Set.indicator_comp_right
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_image {s : Set α} {f : β → M} {g : α → β} (hg : Injective g) {x : α} :
mulIndicator (g '' s) f (g x) = mulIndicator s (f ∘ g) x := by
rw [← mulIndicator_comp_right, preimage_image_eq _ hg]
#align set.mul_indicator_image Set.mulIndicator_image
#align set.indicator_image Set.indicator_image
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_comp_of_one {g : M → N} (hg : g 1 = 1) :
mulIndicator s (g ∘ f) = g ∘ mulIndicator s f := by
funext
simp only [mulIndicator]
split_ifs <;> simp [*]
#align set.mul_indicator_comp_of_one Set.mulIndicator_comp_of_one
#align set.indicator_comp_of_zero Set.indicator_comp_of_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem comp_mulIndicator_const (c : M) (f : M → N) (hf : f 1 = 1) :
(fun x => f (s.mulIndicator (fun _ => c) x)) = s.mulIndicator fun _ => f c :=
(mulIndicator_comp_of_one hf).symm
#align set.comp_mul_indicator_const Set.comp_mulIndicator_const
#align set.comp_indicator_const Set.comp_indicator_const
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_preimage (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (B : Set M) :
mulIndicator s f ⁻¹' B = s.ite (f ⁻¹' B) (1 ⁻¹' B) :=
letI := Classical.decPred (· ∈ s)
piecewise_preimage s f 1 B
#align set.mul_indicator_preimage Set.mulIndicator_preimage
#align set.indicator_preimage Set.indicator_preimage
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_one_preimage (s : Set M) :
t.mulIndicator 1 ⁻¹' s ∈ ({Set.univ, ∅} : Set (Set α)) := by
classical
rw [mulIndicator_one', preimage_one]
split_ifs <;> simp
#align set.mul_indicator_one_preimage Set.mulIndicator_one_preimage
#align set.indicator_zero_preimage Set.indicator_zero_preimage
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_const_preimage_eq_union (U : Set α) (s : Set M) (a : M) [Decidable (a ∈ s)]
[Decidable ((1 : M) ∈ s)] : (U.mulIndicator fun _ => a) ⁻¹' s =
(if a ∈ s then U else ∅) ∪ if (1 : M) ∈ s then Uᶜ else ∅ := by
rw [mulIndicator_preimage, preimage_one, preimage_const]
split_ifs <;> simp [← compl_eq_univ_diff]
#align set.mul_indicator_const_preimage_eq_union Set.mulIndicator_const_preimage_eq_union
#align set.indicator_const_preimage_eq_union Set.indicator_const_preimage_eq_union
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_const_preimage (U : Set α) (s : Set M) (a : M) :
(U.mulIndicator fun _ => a) ⁻¹' s ∈ ({Set.univ, U, Uᶜ, ∅} : Set (Set α)) := by
classical
rw [mulIndicator_const_preimage_eq_union]
split_ifs <;> simp
#align set.mul_indicator_const_preimage Set.mulIndicator_const_preimage
#align set.indicator_const_preimage Set.indicator_const_preimage
theorem indicator_one_preimage [Zero M] (U : Set α) (s : Set M) :
U.indicator 1 ⁻¹' s ∈ ({Set.univ, U, Uᶜ, ∅} : Set (Set α)) :=
indicator_const_preimage _ _ 1
#align set.indicator_one_preimage Set.indicator_one_preimage
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_preimage_of_not_mem (s : Set α) (f : α → M) {t : Set M} (ht : (1 : M) ∉ t) :
mulIndicator s f ⁻¹' t = f ⁻¹' t ∩ s := by
simp [mulIndicator_preimage, Pi.one_def, Set.preimage_const_of_not_mem ht]
#align set.mul_indicator_preimage_of_not_mem Set.mulIndicator_preimage_of_not_mem
#align set.indicator_preimage_of_not_mem Set.indicator_preimage_of_not_mem
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Indicator.lean | 325 | 328 | theorem mem_range_mulIndicator {r : M} {s : Set α} {f : α → M} :
r ∈ range (mulIndicator s f) ↔ r = 1 ∧ s ≠ univ ∨ r ∈ f '' s := by |
simp [mulIndicator, ite_eq_iff, exists_or, eq_univ_iff_forall, and_comm, or_comm,
@eq_comm _ r 1]
|
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Arithmetic
namespace Cardinal
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
variable (g : Ordinal → α)
open Cardinal Ordinal SuccOrder Function Set
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/FixedPointApproximants.lean | 49 | 56 | theorem not_injective_limitation_set : ¬ InjOn g (Iio (ord <| succ #α)) := by |
intro h_inj
have h := lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_injective <| injOn_iff_injective.1 h_inj
have mk_initialSeg_subtype :
#(Iio (ord <| succ #α)) = lift.{u + 1} (succ #α) := by
simpa only [coe_setOf, card_typein, card_ord] using mk_initialSeg (ord <| succ #α)
rw [mk_initialSeg_subtype, lift_lift, lift_le] at h
exact not_le_of_lt (Order.lt_succ #α) h
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Units.Equiv
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Endomorphism
#align_import category_theory.conj from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"32253a1a1071173b33dc7d6a218cf722c6feb514"
universe v u
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace Iso
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
def homCongr {X Y X₁ Y₁ : C} (α : X ≅ X₁) (β : Y ≅ Y₁) : (X ⟶ Y) ≃ (X₁ ⟶ Y₁) where
toFun f := α.inv ≫ f ≫ β.hom
invFun f := α.hom ≫ f ≫ β.inv
left_inv f :=
show α.hom ≫ (α.inv ≫ f ≫ β.hom) ≫ β.inv = f by
rw [Category.assoc, Category.assoc, β.hom_inv_id, α.hom_inv_id_assoc, Category.comp_id]
right_inv f :=
show α.inv ≫ (α.hom ≫ f ≫ β.inv) ≫ β.hom = f by
rw [Category.assoc, Category.assoc, β.inv_hom_id, α.inv_hom_id_assoc, Category.comp_id]
#align category_theory.iso.hom_congr CategoryTheory.Iso.homCongr
-- @[simp, nolint simpNF] Porting note (#10675): dsimp can not prove this
@[simp]
theorem homCongr_apply {X Y X₁ Y₁ : C} (α : X ≅ X₁) (β : Y ≅ Y₁) (f : X ⟶ Y) :
α.homCongr β f = α.inv ≫ f ≫ β.hom := by
rfl
#align category_theory.iso.hom_congr_apply CategoryTheory.Iso.homCongr_apply
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Conj.lean | 55 | 56 | theorem homCongr_comp {X Y Z X₁ Y₁ Z₁ : C} (α : X ≅ X₁) (β : Y ≅ Y₁) (γ : Z ≅ Z₁) (f : X ⟶ Y)
(g : Y ⟶ Z) : α.homCongr γ (f ≫ g) = α.homCongr β f ≫ β.homCongr γ g := by | simp
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.Opposite
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Zero
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Kernels
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.LeftExact
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Limits
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Exact
import Mathlib.Tactic.TFAE
#align_import category_theory.abelian.exact from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory Limits Preadditive
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] [Abelian C]
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace Abelian
variable {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
attribute [local instance] hasEqualizers_of_hasKernels
theorem exact_iff_image_eq_kernel : Exact f g ↔ imageSubobject f = kernelSubobject g := by
constructor
· intro h
have : IsIso (imageToKernel f g h.w) := have := h.epi; isIso_of_mono_of_epi _
refine Subobject.eq_of_comm (asIso (imageToKernel _ _ h.w)) ?_
simp
· apply exact_of_image_eq_kernel
#align category_theory.abelian.exact_iff_image_eq_kernel CategoryTheory.Abelian.exact_iff_image_eq_kernel
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Abelian/Exact.lean | 66 | 81 | theorem exact_iff : Exact f g ↔ f ≫ g = 0 ∧ kernel.ι g ≫ cokernel.π f = 0 := by |
constructor
· exact fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, kernel_comp_cokernel f g h⟩
· refine fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, ?_⟩
suffices hl : IsLimit
(KernelFork.ofι (imageSubobject f).arrow (imageSubobject_arrow_comp_eq_zero h.1)) by
have : imageToKernel f g h.1 = (hl.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit _)).hom ≫
(kernelSubobjectIso _).inv := by ext; simp
rw [this]
infer_instance
refine KernelFork.IsLimit.ofι _ _ (fun u hu ↦ ?_) ?_ (fun _ _ _ h ↦ ?_)
· refine kernel.lift (cokernel.π f) u ?_ ≫ (imageIsoImage f).hom ≫ (imageSubobjectIso _).inv
rw [← kernel.lift_ι g u hu, Category.assoc, h.2, comp_zero]
· aesop_cat
· rw [← cancel_mono (imageSubobject f).arrow, h]
simp
|
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
#align_import set_theory.ordinal.arithmetic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"31b269b60935483943542d547a6dd83a66b37dc7"
assert_not_exists Field
assert_not_exists Module
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Classical
open Cardinal Ordinal
universe u v w
namespace Ordinal
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
{t : γ → γ → Prop}
@[simp]
theorem lift_add (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a + b) = lift.{u} a + lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.sumLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _) (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
#align ordinal.lift_add Ordinal.lift_add
@[simp]
theorem lift_succ (a : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (succ a) = succ (lift.{u} a) := by
rw [← add_one_eq_succ, lift_add, lift_one]
rfl
#align ordinal.lift_succ Ordinal.lift_succ
instance add_contravariantClass_le : ContravariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· + ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun a b c =>
inductionOn a fun α r hr =>
inductionOn b fun β₁ s₁ hs₁ =>
inductionOn c fun β₂ s₂ hs₂ ⟨f⟩ =>
⟨have fl : ∀ a, f (Sum.inl a) = Sum.inl a := fun a => by
simpa only [InitialSeg.trans_apply, InitialSeg.leAdd_apply] using
@InitialSeg.eq _ _ _ _ _
((InitialSeg.leAdd r s₁).trans f) (InitialSeg.leAdd r s₂) a
have : ∀ b, { b' // f (Sum.inr b) = Sum.inr b' } := by
intro b; cases e : f (Sum.inr b)
· rw [← fl] at e
have := f.inj' e
contradiction
· exact ⟨_, rfl⟩
let g (b) := (this b).1
have fr : ∀ b, f (Sum.inr b) = Sum.inr (g b) := fun b => (this b).2
⟨⟨⟨g, fun x y h => by
injection f.inj' (by rw [fr, fr, h] : f (Sum.inr x) = f (Sum.inr y))⟩,
@fun a b => by
-- Porting note:
-- `relEmbedding.coe_fn_to_embedding` & `initial_seg.coe_fn_to_rel_embedding`
-- → `InitialSeg.coe_coe_fn`
simpa only [Sum.lex_inr_inr, fr, InitialSeg.coe_coe_fn, Embedding.coeFn_mk] using
@RelEmbedding.map_rel_iff _ _ _ _ f.toRelEmbedding (Sum.inr a) (Sum.inr b)⟩,
fun a b H => by
rcases f.init (by rw [fr] <;> exact Sum.lex_inr_inr.2 H) with ⟨a' | a', h⟩
· rw [fl] at h
cases h
· rw [fr] at h
exact ⟨a', Sum.inr.inj h⟩⟩⟩⟩
#align ordinal.add_contravariant_class_le Ordinal.add_contravariantClass_le
theorem add_left_cancel (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_left]
#align ordinal.add_left_cancel Ordinal.add_left_cancel
private theorem add_lt_add_iff_left' (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b < a + c ↔ b < c := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_le, add_le_add_iff_left]
instance add_covariantClass_lt : CovariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· + ·) (· < ·) :=
⟨fun a _b _c => (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).2⟩
#align ordinal.add_covariant_class_lt Ordinal.add_covariantClass_lt
instance add_contravariantClass_lt : ContravariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· + ·) (· < ·) :=
⟨fun a _b _c => (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).1⟩
#align ordinal.add_contravariant_class_lt Ordinal.add_contravariantClass_lt
instance add_swap_contravariantClass_lt :
ContravariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (swap (· + ·)) (· < ·) :=
⟨fun _a _b _c => lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => add_le_add_right h _⟩
#align ordinal.add_swap_contravariant_class_lt Ordinal.add_swap_contravariantClass_lt
theorem add_le_add_iff_right {a b : Ordinal} : ∀ n : ℕ, a + n ≤ b + n ↔ a ≤ b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by
simp only [natCast_succ, add_succ, add_succ, succ_le_succ_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
#align ordinal.add_le_add_iff_right Ordinal.add_le_add_iff_right
theorem add_right_cancel {a b : Ordinal} (n : ℕ) : a + n = b + n ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
#align ordinal.add_right_cancel Ordinal.add_right_cancel
theorem add_eq_zero_iff {a b : Ordinal} : a + b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
inductionOn b fun β s _ => by
simp_rw [← type_sum_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
exact isEmpty_sum
#align ordinal.add_eq_zero_iff Ordinal.add_eq_zero_iff
theorem left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : a = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align ordinal.left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero Ordinal.left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero
theorem right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : b = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).2
#align ordinal.right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero Ordinal.right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero
def pred (o : Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then Classical.choose h else o
#align ordinal.pred Ordinal.pred
@[simp]
theorem pred_succ (o) : pred (succ o) = o := by
have h : ∃ a, succ o = succ a := ⟨_, rfl⟩;
simpa only [pred, dif_pos h] using (succ_injective <| Classical.choose_spec h).symm
#align ordinal.pred_succ Ordinal.pred_succ
theorem pred_le_self (o) : pred o ≤ o :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by
let ⟨a, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ]; exact le_succ a
else by rw [pred, dif_neg h]
#align ordinal.pred_le_self Ordinal.pred_le_self
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ {o} : pred o = o ↔ ¬∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e ⟨a, e'⟩ => by rw [e', pred_succ] at e; exact (lt_succ a).ne e, fun h => dif_neg h⟩
#align ordinal.pred_eq_iff_not_succ Ordinal.pred_eq_iff_not_succ
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ' {o} : pred o = o ↔ ∀ a, o ≠ succ a := by
simpa using pred_eq_iff_not_succ
#align ordinal.pred_eq_iff_not_succ' Ordinal.pred_eq_iff_not_succ'
theorem pred_lt_iff_is_succ {o} : pred o < o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
Iff.trans (by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, pred_le_self, true_and_iff, not_le])
(iff_not_comm.1 pred_eq_iff_not_succ).symm
#align ordinal.pred_lt_iff_is_succ Ordinal.pred_lt_iff_is_succ
@[simp]
theorem pred_zero : pred 0 = 0 :=
pred_eq_iff_not_succ'.2 fun a => (succ_ne_zero a).symm
#align ordinal.pred_zero Ordinal.pred_zero
theorem succ_pred_iff_is_succ {o} : succ (pred o) = o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e => ⟨_, e.symm⟩, fun ⟨a, e⟩ => by simp only [e, pred_succ]⟩
#align ordinal.succ_pred_iff_is_succ Ordinal.succ_pred_iff_is_succ
theorem succ_lt_of_not_succ {o b : Ordinal} (h : ¬∃ a, o = succ a) : succ b < o ↔ b < o :=
⟨(lt_succ b).trans, fun l => lt_of_le_of_ne (succ_le_of_lt l) fun e => h ⟨_, e.symm⟩⟩
#align ordinal.succ_lt_of_not_succ Ordinal.succ_lt_of_not_succ
theorem lt_pred {a b} : a < pred b ↔ succ a < b :=
if h : ∃ a, b = succ a then by
let ⟨c, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ, succ_lt_succ_iff]
else by simp only [pred, dif_neg h, succ_lt_of_not_succ h]
#align ordinal.lt_pred Ordinal.lt_pred
theorem pred_le {a b} : pred a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ succ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 lt_pred
#align ordinal.pred_le Ordinal.pred_le
@[simp]
theorem lift_is_succ {o : Ordinal.{v}} : (∃ a, lift.{u} o = succ a) ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
let ⟨b, e⟩ := lift_down <| show a ≤ lift.{u} o from le_of_lt <| h.symm ▸ lt_succ a
⟨b, lift_inj.1 <| by rw [h, ← e, lift_succ]⟩,
fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨lift.{u} a, by simp only [h, lift_succ]⟩⟩
#align ordinal.lift_is_succ Ordinal.lift_is_succ
@[simp]
theorem lift_pred (o : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (pred o) = pred (lift.{u} o) :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by cases' h with a e; simp only [e, pred_succ, lift_succ]
else by rw [pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 h, pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 (mt lift_is_succ.1 h)]
#align ordinal.lift_pred Ordinal.lift_pred
def IsLimit (o : Ordinal) : Prop :=
o ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ a < o, succ a < o
#align ordinal.is_limit Ordinal.IsLimit
theorem IsLimit.isSuccLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : IsSuccLimit o := isSuccLimit_iff_succ_lt.mpr h.2
theorem IsLimit.succ_lt {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : a < o → succ a < o :=
h.2 a
#align ordinal.is_limit.succ_lt Ordinal.IsLimit.succ_lt
theorem isSuccLimit_zero : IsSuccLimit (0 : Ordinal) := isSuccLimit_bot
theorem not_zero_isLimit : ¬IsLimit 0
| ⟨h, _⟩ => h rfl
#align ordinal.not_zero_is_limit Ordinal.not_zero_isLimit
theorem not_succ_isLimit (o) : ¬IsLimit (succ o)
| ⟨_, h⟩ => lt_irrefl _ (h _ (lt_succ o))
#align ordinal.not_succ_is_limit Ordinal.not_succ_isLimit
theorem not_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ¬∃ a, o = succ a
| ⟨a, e⟩ => not_succ_isLimit a (e ▸ h)
#align ordinal.not_succ_of_is_limit Ordinal.not_succ_of_isLimit
theorem succ_lt_of_isLimit {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : succ a < o ↔ a < o :=
⟨(lt_succ a).trans, h.2 _⟩
#align ordinal.succ_lt_of_is_limit Ordinal.succ_lt_of_isLimit
theorem le_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ succ a ↔ o ≤ a :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| succ_lt_of_isLimit h
#align ordinal.le_succ_of_is_limit Ordinal.le_succ_of_isLimit
theorem limit_le {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ a ↔ ∀ x < o, x ≤ a :=
⟨fun h _x l => l.le.trans h, fun H =>
(le_succ_of_isLimit h).1 <| le_of_not_lt fun hn => not_lt_of_le (H _ hn) (lt_succ a)⟩
#align ordinal.limit_le Ordinal.limit_le
theorem lt_limit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : a < o ↔ ∃ x < o, a < x := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@limit_le _ h a)
#align ordinal.lt_limit Ordinal.lt_limit
@[simp]
theorem lift_isLimit (o) : IsLimit (lift o) ↔ IsLimit o :=
and_congr (not_congr <| by simpa only [lift_zero] using @lift_inj o 0)
⟨fun H a h => lift_lt.1 <| by simpa only [lift_succ] using H _ (lift_lt.2 h), fun H a h => by
obtain ⟨a', rfl⟩ := lift_down h.le
rw [← lift_succ, lift_lt]
exact H a' (lift_lt.1 h)⟩
#align ordinal.lift_is_limit Ordinal.lift_isLimit
theorem IsLimit.pos {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 0 < o :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (Ordinal.zero_le _) h.1.symm
#align ordinal.is_limit.pos Ordinal.IsLimit.pos
theorem IsLimit.one_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 1 < o := by
simpa only [succ_zero] using h.2 _ h.pos
#align ordinal.is_limit.one_lt Ordinal.IsLimit.one_lt
theorem IsLimit.nat_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, (n : Ordinal) < o
| 0 => h.pos
| n + 1 => h.2 _ (IsLimit.nat_lt h n)
#align ordinal.is_limit.nat_lt Ordinal.IsLimit.nat_lt
theorem zero_or_succ_or_limit (o : Ordinal) : o = 0 ∨ (∃ a, o = succ a) ∨ IsLimit o :=
if o0 : o = 0 then Or.inl o0
else
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then Or.inr (Or.inl h)
else Or.inr <| Or.inr ⟨o0, fun _a => (succ_lt_of_not_succ h).2⟩
#align ordinal.zero_or_succ_or_limit Ordinal.zero_or_succ_or_limit
@[elab_as_elim]
def limitRecOn {C : Ordinal → Sort*} (o : Ordinal) (H₁ : C 0) (H₂ : ∀ o, C o → C (succ o))
(H₃ : ∀ o, IsLimit o → (∀ o' < o, C o') → C o) : C o :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn o (fun o _ ↦ H₂ o) fun o hl ↦
if h : o = 0 then fun _ ↦ h ▸ H₁ else H₃ o ⟨h, fun _ ↦ hl.succ_lt⟩
#align ordinal.limit_rec_on Ordinal.limitRecOn
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_zero {C} (H₁ H₂ H₃) : @limitRecOn C 0 H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ := by
rw [limitRecOn, SuccOrder.limitRecOn_limit _ _ isSuccLimit_zero, dif_pos rfl]
#align ordinal.limit_rec_on_zero Ordinal.limitRecOn_zero
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_succ {C} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@limitRecOn C (succ o) H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o (@limitRecOn C o H₁ H₂ H₃) := by
simp_rw [limitRecOn, SuccOrder.limitRecOn_succ _ _ (not_isMax _)]
#align ordinal.limit_rec_on_succ Ordinal.limitRecOn_succ
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_limit {C} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ h) :
@limitRecOn C o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o h fun x _h => @limitRecOn C x H₁ H₂ H₃ := by
simp_rw [limitRecOn, SuccOrder.limitRecOn_limit _ _ h.isSuccLimit, dif_neg h.1]
#align ordinal.limit_rec_on_limit Ordinal.limitRecOn_limit
instance orderTopOutSucc (o : Ordinal) : OrderTop (succ o).out.α :=
@OrderTop.mk _ _ (Top.mk _) le_enum_succ
#align ordinal.order_top_out_succ Ordinal.orderTopOutSucc
theorem enum_succ_eq_top {o : Ordinal} :
enum (· < ·) o
(by
rw [type_lt]
exact lt_succ o) =
(⊤ : (succ o).out.α) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.enum_succ_eq_top Ordinal.enum_succ_eq_top
theorem has_succ_of_type_succ_lt {α} {r : α → α → Prop} [wo : IsWellOrder α r]
(h : ∀ a < type r, succ a < type r) (x : α) : ∃ y, r x y := by
use enum r (succ (typein r x)) (h _ (typein_lt_type r x))
convert (enum_lt_enum (typein_lt_type r x)
(h _ (typein_lt_type r x))).mpr (lt_succ _); rw [enum_typein]
#align ordinal.has_succ_of_type_succ_lt Ordinal.has_succ_of_type_succ_lt
theorem out_no_max_of_succ_lt {o : Ordinal} (ho : ∀ a < o, succ a < o) : NoMaxOrder o.out.α :=
⟨has_succ_of_type_succ_lt (by rwa [type_lt])⟩
#align ordinal.out_no_max_of_succ_lt Ordinal.out_no_max_of_succ_lt
theorem bounded_singleton {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (hr : (type r).IsLimit) (x) :
Bounded r {x} := by
refine ⟨enum r (succ (typein r x)) (hr.2 _ (typein_lt_type r x)), ?_⟩
intro b hb
rw [mem_singleton_iff.1 hb]
nth_rw 1 [← enum_typein r x]
rw [@enum_lt_enum _ r]
apply lt_succ
#align ordinal.bounded_singleton Ordinal.bounded_singleton
-- Porting note: `· < ·` requires a type ascription for an `IsWellOrder` instance.
theorem type_subrel_lt (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
type (Subrel ((· < ·) : Ordinal → Ordinal → Prop) { o' : Ordinal | o' < o })
= Ordinal.lift.{u + 1} o := by
refine Quotient.inductionOn o ?_
rintro ⟨α, r, wo⟩; apply Quotient.sound
-- Porting note: `symm; refine' [term]` → `refine' [term].symm`
constructor; refine ((RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans (enumIso r).symm).symm
#align ordinal.type_subrel_lt Ordinal.type_subrel_lt
theorem mk_initialSeg (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
#{ o' : Ordinal | o' < o } = Cardinal.lift.{u + 1} o.card := by
rw [lift_card, ← type_subrel_lt, card_type]
#align ordinal.mk_initial_seg Ordinal.mk_initialSeg
def IsNormal (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) : Prop :=
(∀ o, f o < f (succ o)) ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a
#align ordinal.is_normal Ordinal.IsNormal
theorem IsNormal.limit_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) :
∀ {o}, IsLimit o → ∀ {a}, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a :=
@H.2
#align ordinal.is_normal.limit_le Ordinal.IsNormal.limit_le
theorem IsNormal.limit_lt {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} :
a < f o ↔ ∃ b < o, a < f b :=
not_iff_not.1 <| by simpa only [exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_lt] using H.2 _ h a
#align ordinal.is_normal.limit_lt Ordinal.IsNormal.limit_lt
theorem IsNormal.strictMono {f} (H : IsNormal f) : StrictMono f := fun a b =>
limitRecOn b (Not.elim (not_lt_of_le <| Ordinal.zero_le _))
(fun _b IH h =>
(lt_or_eq_of_le (le_of_lt_succ h)).elim (fun h => (IH h).trans (H.1 _)) fun e => e ▸ H.1 _)
fun _b l _IH h => lt_of_lt_of_le (H.1 a) ((H.2 _ l _).1 le_rfl _ (l.2 _ h))
#align ordinal.is_normal.strict_mono Ordinal.IsNormal.strictMono
theorem IsNormal.monotone {f} (H : IsNormal f) : Monotone f :=
H.strictMono.monotone
#align ordinal.is_normal.monotone Ordinal.IsNormal.monotone
theorem isNormal_iff_strictMono_limit (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) :
IsNormal f ↔ StrictMono f ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, (∀ b < o, f b ≤ a) → f o ≤ a :=
⟨fun hf => ⟨hf.strictMono, fun a ha c => (hf.2 a ha c).2⟩, fun ⟨hs, hl⟩ =>
⟨fun a => hs (lt_succ a), fun a ha c =>
⟨fun hac _b hba => ((hs hba).trans_le hac).le, hl a ha c⟩⟩⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal_iff_strict_mono_limit Ordinal.isNormal_iff_strictMono_limit
theorem IsNormal.lt_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a < f b ↔ a < b :=
StrictMono.lt_iff_lt <| H.strictMono
#align ordinal.is_normal.lt_iff Ordinal.IsNormal.lt_iff
theorem IsNormal.le_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a ≤ f b ↔ a ≤ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 H.lt_iff
#align ordinal.is_normal.le_iff Ordinal.IsNormal.le_iff
theorem IsNormal.inj {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a = f b ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, H.le_iff]
#align ordinal.is_normal.inj Ordinal.IsNormal.inj
theorem IsNormal.self_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) (a) : a ≤ f a :=
lt_wf.self_le_of_strictMono H.strictMono a
#align ordinal.is_normal.self_le Ordinal.IsNormal.self_le
theorem IsNormal.le_set {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set Ordinal) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f a ≤ o :=
⟨fun h a pa => (H.le_iff.2 ((H₂ _).1 le_rfl _ pa)).trans h, fun h => by
-- Porting note: `refine'` didn't work well so `induction` is used
induction b using limitRecOn with
| H₁ =>
cases' p0 with x px
have := Ordinal.le_zero.1 ((H₂ _).1 (Ordinal.zero_le _) _ px)
rw [this] at px
exact h _ px
| H₂ S _ =>
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ S).2 <| (lt_succ S).not_le) with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| succ_le_of_lt <| not_le.1 h₂).trans (h _ h₁)
| H₃ S L _ =>
refine (H.2 _ L _).2 fun a h' => ?_
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ a).2 h'.not_le) with ⟨b, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| (not_le.1 h₂).le).trans (h _ h₁)⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.le_set Ordinal.IsNormal.le_set
theorem IsNormal.le_set' {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set α) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (g : α → Ordinal) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, g a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f (g a) ≤ o := by
simpa [H₂] using H.le_set (g '' p) (p0.image g) b
#align ordinal.is_normal.le_set' Ordinal.IsNormal.le_set'
theorem IsNormal.refl : IsNormal id :=
⟨lt_succ, fun _o l _a => Ordinal.limit_le l⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.refl Ordinal.IsNormal.refl
theorem IsNormal.trans {f g} (H₁ : IsNormal f) (H₂ : IsNormal g) : IsNormal (f ∘ g) :=
⟨fun _x => H₁.lt_iff.2 (H₂.1 _), fun o l _a =>
H₁.le_set' (· < o) ⟨0, l.pos⟩ g _ fun _c => H₂.2 _ l _⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.trans Ordinal.IsNormal.trans
theorem IsNormal.isLimit {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (l : IsLimit o) : IsLimit (f o) :=
⟨ne_of_gt <| (Ordinal.zero_le _).trans_lt <| H.lt_iff.2 l.pos, fun _ h =>
let ⟨_b, h₁, h₂⟩ := (H.limit_lt l).1 h
(succ_le_of_lt h₂).trans_lt (H.lt_iff.2 h₁)⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.is_limit Ordinal.IsNormal.isLimit
theorem IsNormal.le_iff_eq {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : f a ≤ a ↔ f a = a :=
(H.self_le a).le_iff_eq
#align ordinal.is_normal.le_iff_eq Ordinal.IsNormal.le_iff_eq
theorem add_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) : a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a + b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h b' l => (add_le_add_left l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
le_of_not_lt <| by
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
intro l
suffices ∀ x : β, Sum.Lex r s (Sum.inr x) (enum _ _ l) by
-- Porting note: `revert` & `intro` is required because `cases'` doesn't replace
-- `enum _ _ l` in `this`.
revert this; cases' enum _ _ l with x x <;> intro this
· cases this (enum s 0 h.pos)
· exact irrefl _ (this _)
intro x
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Sum.Lex r s), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.2 _ (typein_lt_type s x))
rw [add_succ, succ_le_iff] at this
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨a | b, h⟩
· exact Sum.inl a
· exact Sum.inr ⟨b, by cases h; assumption⟩
· rcases a with ⟨a | a, h₁⟩ <;> rcases b with ⟨b | b, h₂⟩ <;> cases h₁ <;> cases h₂ <;>
rintro ⟨⟩ <;> constructor <;> assumption⟩
#align ordinal.add_le_of_limit Ordinal.add_le_of_limit
theorem add_isNormal (a : Ordinal) : IsNormal (a + ·) :=
⟨fun b => (add_lt_add_iff_left a).2 (lt_succ b), fun _b l _c => add_le_of_limit l⟩
#align ordinal.add_is_normal Ordinal.add_isNormal
theorem add_isLimit (a) {b} : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a + b) :=
(add_isNormal a).isLimit
#align ordinal.add_is_limit Ordinal.add_isLimit
alias IsLimit.add := add_isLimit
#align ordinal.is_limit.add Ordinal.IsLimit.add
theorem sub_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} : { o | a ≤ b + o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, le_add_left _ _⟩
#align ordinal.sub_nonempty Ordinal.sub_nonempty
instance sub : Sub Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => sInf { o | a ≤ b + o }⟩
theorem le_add_sub (a b : Ordinal) : a ≤ b + (a - b) :=
csInf_mem sub_nonempty
#align ordinal.le_add_sub Ordinal.le_add_sub
theorem sub_le {a b c : Ordinal} : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b + c :=
⟨fun h => (le_add_sub a b).trans (add_le_add_left h _), fun h => csInf_le' h⟩
#align ordinal.sub_le Ordinal.sub_le
theorem lt_sub {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b - c ↔ c + a < b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le sub_le
#align ordinal.lt_sub Ordinal.lt_sub
theorem add_sub_cancel (a b : Ordinal) : a + b - a = b :=
le_antisymm (sub_le.2 <| le_rfl) ((add_le_add_iff_left a).1 <| le_add_sub _ _)
#align ordinal.add_sub_cancel Ordinal.add_sub_cancel
theorem sub_eq_of_add_eq {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a + b = c) : c - a = b :=
h ▸ add_sub_cancel _ _
#align ordinal.sub_eq_of_add_eq Ordinal.sub_eq_of_add_eq
theorem sub_le_self (a b : Ordinal) : a - b ≤ a :=
sub_le.2 <| le_add_left _ _
#align ordinal.sub_le_self Ordinal.sub_le_self
protected theorem add_sub_cancel_of_le {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : b + (a - b) = a :=
(le_add_sub a b).antisymm'
(by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit (a - b) with (e | ⟨c, e⟩ | l)
· simp only [e, add_zero, h]
· rw [e, add_succ, succ_le_iff, ← lt_sub, e]
exact lt_succ c
· exact (add_le_of_limit l).2 fun c l => (lt_sub.1 l).le)
#align ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le
theorem le_sub_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : c ≤ a - b ↔ b + c ≤ a := by
rw [← add_le_add_iff_left b, Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h]
#align ordinal.le_sub_of_le Ordinal.le_sub_of_le
theorem sub_lt_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : a - b < c ↔ a < b + c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (le_sub_of_le h)
#align ordinal.sub_lt_of_le Ordinal.sub_lt_of_le
instance existsAddOfLE : ExistsAddOfLE Ordinal :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, (Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h).symm⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem sub_zero (a : Ordinal) : a - 0 = a := by simpa only [zero_add] using add_sub_cancel 0 a
#align ordinal.sub_zero Ordinal.sub_zero
@[simp]
theorem zero_sub (a : Ordinal) : 0 - a = 0 := by rw [← Ordinal.le_zero]; apply sub_le_self
#align ordinal.zero_sub Ordinal.zero_sub
@[simp]
theorem sub_self (a : Ordinal) : a - a = 0 := by simpa only [add_zero] using add_sub_cancel a 0
#align ordinal.sub_self Ordinal.sub_self
protected theorem sub_eq_zero_iff_le {a b : Ordinal} : a - b = 0 ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [h, add_zero] using le_add_sub a b, fun h => by
rwa [← Ordinal.le_zero, sub_le, add_zero]⟩
#align ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le
theorem sub_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a - b - c = a - (b + c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, sub_le, sub_le, add_assoc]
#align ordinal.sub_sub Ordinal.sub_sub
@[simp]
theorem add_sub_add_cancel (a b c : Ordinal) : a + b - (a + c) = b - c := by
rw [← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel]
#align ordinal.add_sub_add_cancel Ordinal.add_sub_add_cancel
theorem sub_isLimit {a b} (l : IsLimit a) (h : b < a) : IsLimit (a - b) :=
⟨ne_of_gt <| lt_sub.2 <| by rwa [add_zero], fun c h => by
rw [lt_sub, add_succ]; exact l.2 _ (lt_sub.1 h)⟩
#align ordinal.sub_is_limit Ordinal.sub_isLimit
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem one_add_omega : 1 + ω = ω := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_add_left _ _)
rw [omega, ← lift_one.{_, 0}, ← lift_add, lift_le, ← type_unit, ← type_sum_lex]
refine ⟨RelEmbedding.collapse (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone ?_ ?_)⟩
· apply Sum.rec
· exact fun _ => 0
· exact Nat.succ
· intro a b
cases a <;> cases b <;> intro H <;> cases' H with _ _ H _ _ H <;>
[exact H.elim; exact Nat.succ_pos _; exact Nat.succ_lt_succ H]
#align ordinal.one_add_omega Ordinal.one_add_omega
@[simp]
theorem one_add_of_omega_le {o} (h : ω ≤ o) : 1 + o = o := by
rw [← Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h, ← add_assoc, one_add_omega]
#align ordinal.one_add_of_omega_le Ordinal.one_add_of_omega_le
instance monoid : Monoid Ordinal.{u} where
mul a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b
(fun ⟨α, r, wo⟩ ⟨β, s, wo'⟩ => ⟦⟨β × α, Prod.Lex s r, inferInstance⟩⟧ :
WellOrder → WellOrder → Ordinal)
fun ⟨α₁, r₁, o₁⟩ ⟨α₂, r₂, o₂⟩ ⟨β₁, s₁, p₁⟩ ⟨β₂, s₂, p₂⟩ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ =>
Quot.sound ⟨RelIso.prodLexCongr g f⟩
one := 1
mul_assoc a b c :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Eq.symm <|
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodAssoc _ _ _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨a₁, a₂⟩, a₃⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, b₃⟩
simp [Prod.lex_def, and_or_left, or_assoc, and_assoc]⟩⟩
mul_one a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨punitProd _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, a⟩; rcases b with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, b⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, false_or_iff]
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, true_and_iff]
rfl⟩⟩
one_mul a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodPUnit _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨a, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩; rcases b with ⟨b, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, and_false_iff, or_false_iff]
rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_prod_lex {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type (Prod.Lex s r) = type r * type s :=
rfl
#align ordinal.type_prod_lex Ordinal.type_prod_lex
private theorem mul_eq_zero' {a b : Ordinal} : a * b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
inductionOn a fun α _ _ =>
inductionOn b fun β _ _ => by
simp_rw [← type_prod_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
rw [or_comm]
exact isEmpty_prod
instance monoidWithZero : MonoidWithZero Ordinal :=
{ Ordinal.monoid with
zero := 0
mul_zero := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inr rfl
zero_mul := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inl rfl }
instance noZeroDivisors : NoZeroDivisors Ordinal :=
⟨fun {_ _} => mul_eq_zero'.1⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_mul (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a * b) = lift.{u} a * lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.prodLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
#align ordinal.lift_mul Ordinal.lift_mul
@[simp]
theorem card_mul (a b) : card (a * b) = card a * card b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨α, _r, _⟩ ⟨β, _s, _⟩ => mul_comm #β #α
#align ordinal.card_mul Ordinal.card_mul
instance leftDistribClass : LeftDistribClass Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a b c =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨sumProdDistrib _ _ _, by
rintro ⟨a₁ | a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨b₁ | b₁, b₂⟩ <;>
simp only [Prod.lex_def, Sum.lex_inl_inl, Sum.Lex.sep, Sum.lex_inr_inl,
Sum.lex_inr_inr, sumProdDistrib_apply_left, sumProdDistrib_apply_right] <;>
-- Porting note: `Sum.inr.inj_iff` is required.
simp only [Sum.inl.inj_iff, Sum.inr.inj_iff,
true_or_iff, false_and_iff, false_or_iff]⟩⟩⟩
theorem mul_succ (a b : Ordinal) : a * succ b = a * b + a :=
mul_add_one a b
#align ordinal.mul_succ Ordinal.mul_succ
instance mul_covariantClass_le : CovariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· * ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : α × γ => (f a.1, a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
cases' h with a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ h' a b₁ b₂ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ h'⟩
#align ordinal.mul_covariant_class_le Ordinal.mul_covariantClass_le
instance mul_swap_covariantClass_le :
CovariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : γ × α => (a.1, f a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
cases' h with a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ h' a b₁ b₂ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')⟩
#align ordinal.mul_swap_covariant_class_le Ordinal.mul_swap_covariantClass_le
theorem le_mul_left (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ a * b := by
convert mul_le_mul_left' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [mul_one a]
#align ordinal.le_mul_left Ordinal.le_mul_left
theorem le_mul_right (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ b * a := by
convert mul_le_mul_right' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [one_mul a]
#align ordinal.le_mul_right Ordinal.le_mul_right
private theorem mul_le_of_limit_aux {α β r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] {c}
(h : IsLimit (type s)) (H : ∀ b' < type s, type r * b' ≤ c) (l : c < type r * type s) :
False := by
suffices ∀ a b, Prod.Lex s r (b, a) (enum _ _ l) by
cases' enum _ _ l with b a
exact irrefl _ (this _ _)
intro a b
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Prod.Lex s r), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.2 _ (typein_lt_type s b))
rw [mul_succ] at this
have := ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 (typein_lt_type _ a)).trans_le this
refine (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b', a'⟩, h⟩
by_cases e : b = b'
· refine Sum.inr ⟨a', ?_⟩
subst e
cases' h with _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ h
· exact (irrefl _ h).elim
· exact h
· refine Sum.inl (⟨b', ?_⟩, a')
cases' h with _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ h
· exact h
· exact (e rfl).elim
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b₁, a₁⟩, h₁⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₂, a₂⟩, h₂⟩
intro h
by_cases e₁ : b = b₁ <;> by_cases e₂ : b = b₂
· substs b₁ b₂
simpa only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, @irrefl _ s _ b, true_and_iff, false_or_iff,
eq_self_iff_true, dif_pos, Sum.lex_inr_inr] using h
· subst b₁
simp only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, e₂, Prod.lex_def, dif_pos, subrel_val, eq_self_iff_true,
or_false_iff, dif_neg, not_false_iff, Sum.lex_inr_inl, false_and_iff] at h ⊢
cases' h₂ with _ _ _ _ h₂_h h₂_h <;> [exact asymm h h₂_h; exact e₂ rfl]
-- Porting note: `cc` hadn't ported yet.
· simp [e₂, dif_neg e₁, show b₂ ≠ b₁ from e₂ ▸ e₁]
· simpa only [dif_neg e₁, dif_neg e₂, Prod.lex_def, subrel_val, Subtype.mk_eq_mk,
Sum.lex_inl_inl] using h
theorem mul_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) : a * b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a * b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h b' l => (mul_le_mul_left' l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
le_of_not_lt <| by
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
exact mul_le_of_limit_aux h H⟩
#align ordinal.mul_le_of_limit Ordinal.mul_le_of_limit
theorem mul_isNormal {a : Ordinal} (h : 0 < a) : IsNormal (a * ·) :=
-- Porting note(#12129): additional beta reduction needed
⟨fun b => by
beta_reduce
rw [mul_succ]
simpa only [add_zero] using (add_lt_add_iff_left (a * b)).2 h,
fun b l c => mul_le_of_limit l⟩
#align ordinal.mul_is_normal Ordinal.mul_isNormal
theorem lt_mul_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit c) : a < b * c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b * c' := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@mul_le_of_limit b c a h)
#align ordinal.lt_mul_of_limit Ordinal.lt_mul_of_limit
theorem mul_lt_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b < a * c ↔ b < c :=
(mul_isNormal a0).lt_iff
#align ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left
theorem mul_le_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(mul_isNormal a0).le_iff
#align ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left Ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a < b) (c0 : 0 < c) : c * a < c * b :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_left c0).2 h
#align ordinal.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left
theorem mul_pos {a b : Ordinal} (h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : 0 < b) : 0 < a * b := by
simpa only [mul_zero] using mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h₂ h₁
#align ordinal.mul_pos Ordinal.mul_pos
theorem mul_ne_zero {a b : Ordinal} : a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → a * b ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero] using mul_pos
#align ordinal.mul_ne_zero Ordinal.mul_ne_zero
theorem le_of_mul_le_mul_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c * a ≤ c * b) (h0 : 0 < c) : a ≤ b :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt (fun h' => mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h' h0) h
#align ordinal.le_of_mul_le_mul_left Ordinal.le_of_mul_le_mul_left
theorem mul_right_inj {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
(mul_isNormal a0).inj
#align ordinal.mul_right_inj Ordinal.mul_right_inj
theorem mul_isLimit {a b : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a * b) :=
(mul_isNormal a0).isLimit
#align ordinal.mul_is_limit Ordinal.mul_isLimit
theorem mul_isLimit_left {a b : Ordinal} (l : IsLimit a) (b0 : 0 < b) : IsLimit (a * b) := by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with (rfl | ⟨b, rfl⟩ | lb)
· exact b0.false.elim
· rw [mul_succ]
exact add_isLimit _ l
· exact mul_isLimit l.pos lb
#align ordinal.mul_is_limit_left Ordinal.mul_isLimit_left
theorem smul_eq_mul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (a : Ordinal), n • a = a * n
| 0, a => by rw [zero_nsmul, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero]
| n + 1, a => by rw [succ_nsmul, Nat.cast_add, mul_add, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, smul_eq_mul n]
#align ordinal.smul_eq_mul Ordinal.smul_eq_mul
theorem div_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : { o | a < b * succ o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, (succ_le_iff (a := a) (b := b * succ a)).1 <| by
simpa only [succ_zero, one_mul] using
mul_le_mul_right' (succ_le_of_lt (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h)) (succ a)⟩
#align ordinal.div_nonempty Ordinal.div_nonempty
instance div : Div Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => if _h : b = 0 then 0 else sInf { o | a < b * succ o }⟩
@[simp]
theorem div_zero (a : Ordinal) : a / 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
#align ordinal.div_zero Ordinal.div_zero
theorem div_def (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a / b = sInf { o | a < b * succ o } :=
dif_neg h
#align ordinal.div_def Ordinal.div_def
theorem lt_mul_succ_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * succ (a / b) := by
rw [div_def a h]; exact csInf_mem (div_nonempty h)
#align ordinal.lt_mul_succ_div Ordinal.lt_mul_succ_div
theorem lt_mul_div_add (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * (a / b) + b := by
simpa only [mul_succ] using lt_mul_succ_div a h
#align ordinal.lt_mul_div_add Ordinal.lt_mul_div_add
theorem div_le {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b ≤ c ↔ a < b * succ c :=
⟨fun h => (lt_mul_succ_div a b0).trans_le (mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_succ_iff.2 h) _), fun h => by
rw [div_def a b0]; exact csInf_le' h⟩
#align ordinal.div_le Ordinal.div_le
theorem lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : a < b / c ↔ c * succ a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_le, div_le h, not_lt]
#align ordinal.lt_div Ordinal.lt_div
theorem div_pos {b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : 0 < b / c ↔ c ≤ b := by simp [lt_div h]
#align ordinal.div_pos Ordinal.div_pos
theorem le_div {a b c : Ordinal} (c0 : c ≠ 0) : a ≤ b / c ↔ c * a ≤ b := by
induction a using limitRecOn with
| H₁ => simp only [mul_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
| H₂ _ _ => rw [succ_le_iff, lt_div c0]
| H₃ _ h₁ h₂ =>
revert h₁ h₂
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [mul_le_of_limit, limit_le, iff_self_iff,
forall_true_iff]
#align ordinal.le_div Ordinal.le_div
theorem div_lt {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b < c ↔ a < b * c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_div b0
#align ordinal.div_lt Ordinal.div_lt
theorem div_le_of_le_mul {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / b ≤ c :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, div_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
else
(div_le b0).2 <| h.trans_lt <| mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left (lt_succ c) (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 b0)
#align ordinal.div_le_of_le_mul Ordinal.div_le_of_le_mul
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b / c → c * a < b :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le div_le_of_le_mul
#align ordinal.mul_lt_of_lt_div Ordinal.mul_lt_of_lt_div
@[simp]
theorem zero_div (a : Ordinal) : 0 / a = 0 :=
Ordinal.le_zero.1 <| div_le_of_le_mul <| Ordinal.zero_le _
#align ordinal.zero_div Ordinal.zero_div
theorem mul_div_le (a b : Ordinal) : b * (a / b) ≤ a :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, zero_mul, Ordinal.zero_le] else (le_div b0).1 le_rfl
#align ordinal.mul_div_le Ordinal.mul_div_le
theorem mul_add_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (c) : (b * a + c) / b = a + c / b := by
apply le_antisymm
· apply (div_le b0).2
rw [mul_succ, mul_add, add_assoc, add_lt_add_iff_left]
apply lt_mul_div_add _ b0
· rw [le_div b0, mul_add, add_le_add_iff_left]
apply mul_div_le
#align ordinal.mul_add_div Ordinal.mul_add_div
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean | 943 | 945 | theorem div_eq_zero_of_lt {a b : Ordinal} (h : a < b) : a / b = 0 := by |
rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, div_le <| Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 <| (Ordinal.zero_le _).trans_lt h]
simpa only [succ_zero, mul_one] using h
|
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.ProperSpace
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Cauchy
open Set Filter Bornology
open scoped ENNReal Uniformity Topology Pointwise
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {X ι : Type*}
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α]
namespace Metric
#align metric.bounded Bornology.IsBounded
section Bounded
variable {x : α} {s t : Set α} {r : ℝ}
#noalign metric.bounded_iff_is_bounded
#align metric.bounded_empty Bornology.isBounded_empty
#align metric.bounded_iff_mem_bounded Bornology.isBounded_iff_forall_mem
#align metric.bounded.mono Bornology.IsBounded.subset
theorem isBounded_closedBall : IsBounded (closedBall x r) :=
isBounded_iff.2 ⟨r + r, fun y hy z hz =>
calc dist y z ≤ dist y x + dist z x := dist_triangle_right _ _ _
_ ≤ r + r := add_le_add hy hz⟩
#align metric.bounded_closed_ball Metric.isBounded_closedBall
theorem isBounded_ball : IsBounded (ball x r) :=
isBounded_closedBall.subset ball_subset_closedBall
#align metric.bounded_ball Metric.isBounded_ball
theorem isBounded_sphere : IsBounded (sphere x r) :=
isBounded_closedBall.subset sphere_subset_closedBall
#align metric.bounded_sphere Metric.isBounded_sphere
theorem isBounded_iff_subset_closedBall (c : α) : IsBounded s ↔ ∃ r, s ⊆ closedBall c r :=
⟨fun h ↦ (isBounded_iff.1 (h.insert c)).imp fun _r hr _x hx ↦ hr (.inr hx) (mem_insert _ _),
fun ⟨_r, hr⟩ ↦ isBounded_closedBall.subset hr⟩
#align metric.bounded_iff_subset_ball Metric.isBounded_iff_subset_closedBall
theorem _root_.Bornology.IsBounded.subset_closedBall (h : IsBounded s) (c : α) :
∃ r, s ⊆ closedBall c r :=
(isBounded_iff_subset_closedBall c).1 h
#align metric.bounded.subset_ball Bornology.IsBounded.subset_closedBall
theorem _root_.Bornology.IsBounded.subset_ball_lt (h : IsBounded s) (a : ℝ) (c : α) :
∃ r, a < r ∧ s ⊆ ball c r :=
let ⟨r, hr⟩ := h.subset_closedBall c
⟨max r a + 1, (le_max_right _ _).trans_lt (lt_add_one _), hr.trans <| closedBall_subset_ball <|
(le_max_left _ _).trans_lt (lt_add_one _)⟩
theorem _root_.Bornology.IsBounded.subset_ball (h : IsBounded s) (c : α) : ∃ r, s ⊆ ball c r :=
(h.subset_ball_lt 0 c).imp fun _ ↦ And.right
theorem isBounded_iff_subset_ball (c : α) : IsBounded s ↔ ∃ r, s ⊆ ball c r :=
⟨(IsBounded.subset_ball · c), fun ⟨_r, hr⟩ ↦ isBounded_ball.subset hr⟩
theorem _root_.Bornology.IsBounded.subset_closedBall_lt (h : IsBounded s) (a : ℝ) (c : α) :
∃ r, a < r ∧ s ⊆ closedBall c r :=
let ⟨r, har, hr⟩ := h.subset_ball_lt a c
⟨r, har, hr.trans ball_subset_closedBall⟩
#align metric.bounded.subset_ball_lt Bornology.IsBounded.subset_closedBall_lt
theorem isBounded_closure_of_isBounded (h : IsBounded s) : IsBounded (closure s) :=
let ⟨C, h⟩ := isBounded_iff.1 h
isBounded_iff.2 ⟨C, fun _a ha _b hb => isClosed_Iic.closure_subset <|
map_mem_closure₂ continuous_dist ha hb h⟩
#align metric.bounded_closure_of_bounded Metric.isBounded_closure_of_isBounded
protected theorem _root_.Bornology.IsBounded.closure (h : IsBounded s) : IsBounded (closure s) :=
isBounded_closure_of_isBounded h
#align metric.bounded.closure Bornology.IsBounded.closure
@[simp]
theorem isBounded_closure_iff : IsBounded (closure s) ↔ IsBounded s :=
⟨fun h => h.subset subset_closure, fun h => h.closure⟩
#align metric.bounded_closure_iff Metric.isBounded_closure_iff
#align metric.bounded_union Bornology.isBounded_union
#align metric.bounded.union Bornology.IsBounded.union
#align metric.bounded_bUnion Bornology.isBounded_biUnion
#align metric.bounded.prod Bornology.IsBounded.prod
theorem hasBasis_cobounded_compl_closedBall (c : α) :
(cobounded α).HasBasis (fun _ ↦ True) (fun r ↦ (closedBall c r)ᶜ) :=
⟨compl_surjective.forall.2 fun _ ↦ (isBounded_iff_subset_closedBall c).trans <| by simp⟩
theorem hasBasis_cobounded_compl_ball (c : α) :
(cobounded α).HasBasis (fun _ ↦ True) (fun r ↦ (ball c r)ᶜ) :=
⟨compl_surjective.forall.2 fun _ ↦ (isBounded_iff_subset_ball c).trans <| by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem comap_dist_right_atTop (c : α) : comap (dist · c) atTop = cobounded α :=
(atTop_basis.comap _).eq_of_same_basis <| by
simpa only [compl_def, mem_ball, not_lt] using hasBasis_cobounded_compl_ball c
@[simp]
theorem comap_dist_left_atTop (c : α) : comap (dist c) atTop = cobounded α := by
simpa only [dist_comm _ c] using comap_dist_right_atTop c
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_dist_right_atTop_iff (c : α) {f : β → α} {l : Filter β} :
Tendsto (fun x ↦ dist (f x) c) l atTop ↔ Tendsto f l (cobounded α) := by
rw [← comap_dist_right_atTop c, tendsto_comap_iff, Function.comp_def]
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_dist_left_atTop_iff (c : α) {f : β → α} {l : Filter β} :
Tendsto (fun x ↦ dist c (f x)) l atTop ↔ Tendsto f l (cobounded α) := by
simp only [dist_comm c, tendsto_dist_right_atTop_iff]
theorem tendsto_dist_right_cobounded_atTop (c : α) : Tendsto (dist · c) (cobounded α) atTop :=
tendsto_iff_comap.2 (comap_dist_right_atTop c).ge
theorem tendsto_dist_left_cobounded_atTop (c : α) : Tendsto (dist c) (cobounded α) atTop :=
tendsto_iff_comap.2 (comap_dist_left_atTop c).ge
theorem _root_.TotallyBounded.isBounded {s : Set α} (h : TotallyBounded s) : IsBounded s :=
-- We cover the totally bounded set by finitely many balls of radius 1,
-- and then argue that a finite union of bounded sets is bounded
let ⟨_t, fint, subs⟩ := (totallyBounded_iff.mp h) 1 zero_lt_one
((isBounded_biUnion fint).2 fun _ _ => isBounded_ball).subset subs
#align totally_bounded.bounded TotallyBounded.isBounded
theorem _root_.IsCompact.isBounded {s : Set α} (h : IsCompact s) : IsBounded s :=
-- A compact set is totally bounded, thus bounded
h.totallyBounded.isBounded
#align is_compact.bounded IsCompact.isBounded
#align metric.bounded_of_finite Set.Finite.isBounded
#align set.finite.bounded Set.Finite.isBounded
#align metric.bounded_singleton Bornology.isBounded_singleton
theorem cobounded_le_cocompact : cobounded α ≤ cocompact α :=
hasBasis_cocompact.ge_iff.2 fun _s hs ↦ hs.isBounded
#align comap_dist_right_at_top_le_cocompact Metric.cobounded_le_cocompactₓ
#align comap_dist_left_at_top_le_cocompact Metric.cobounded_le_cocompactₓ
theorem isCobounded_iff_closedBall_compl_subset {s : Set α} (c : α) :
IsCobounded s ↔ ∃ (r : ℝ), (Metric.closedBall c r)ᶜ ⊆ s := by
rw [← isBounded_compl_iff, isBounded_iff_subset_closedBall c]
apply exists_congr
intro r
rw [compl_subset_comm]
theorem _root_.Bornology.IsCobounded.closedBall_compl_subset {s : Set α} (hs : IsCobounded s)
(c : α) : ∃ (r : ℝ), (Metric.closedBall c r)ᶜ ⊆ s :=
(isCobounded_iff_closedBall_compl_subset c).mp hs
theorem closedBall_compl_subset_of_mem_cocompact {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ cocompact α) (c : α) :
∃ (r : ℝ), (Metric.closedBall c r)ᶜ ⊆ s :=
IsCobounded.closedBall_compl_subset (cobounded_le_cocompact hs) c
theorem mem_cocompact_of_closedBall_compl_subset [ProperSpace α] (c : α)
(h : ∃ r, (closedBall c r)ᶜ ⊆ s) : s ∈ cocompact α := by
rcases h with ⟨r, h⟩
rw [Filter.mem_cocompact]
exact ⟨closedBall c r, isCompact_closedBall c r, h⟩
theorem mem_cocompact_iff_closedBall_compl_subset [ProperSpace α] (c : α) :
s ∈ cocompact α ↔ ∃ r, (closedBall c r)ᶜ ⊆ s :=
⟨(closedBall_compl_subset_of_mem_cocompact · _), mem_cocompact_of_closedBall_compl_subset _⟩
theorem isBounded_range_iff {f : β → α} : IsBounded (range f) ↔ ∃ C, ∀ x y, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ C :=
isBounded_iff.trans <| by simp only [forall_mem_range]
#align metric.bounded_range_iff Metric.isBounded_range_iff
theorem isBounded_image_iff {f : β → α} {s : Set β} :
IsBounded (f '' s) ↔ ∃ C, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ C :=
isBounded_iff.trans <| by simp only [forall_mem_image]
theorem isBounded_range_of_tendsto_cofinite_uniformity {f : β → α}
(hf : Tendsto (Prod.map f f) (.cofinite ×ˢ .cofinite) (𝓤 α)) : IsBounded (range f) := by
rcases (hasBasis_cofinite.prod_self.tendsto_iff uniformity_basis_dist).1 hf 1 zero_lt_one with
⟨s, hsf, hs1⟩
rw [← image_union_image_compl_eq_range]
refine (hsf.image f).isBounded.union (isBounded_image_iff.2 ⟨1, fun x hx y hy ↦ ?_⟩)
exact le_of_lt (hs1 (x, y) ⟨hx, hy⟩)
#align metric.bounded_range_of_tendsto_cofinite_uniformity Metric.isBounded_range_of_tendsto_cofinite_uniformity
theorem isBounded_range_of_cauchy_map_cofinite {f : β → α} (hf : Cauchy (map f cofinite)) :
IsBounded (range f) :=
isBounded_range_of_tendsto_cofinite_uniformity <| (cauchy_map_iff.1 hf).2
#align metric.bounded_range_of_cauchy_map_cofinite Metric.isBounded_range_of_cauchy_map_cofinite
theorem _root_.CauchySeq.isBounded_range {f : ℕ → α} (hf : CauchySeq f) : IsBounded (range f) :=
isBounded_range_of_cauchy_map_cofinite <| by rwa [Nat.cofinite_eq_atTop]
#align cauchy_seq.bounded_range CauchySeq.isBounded_range
theorem isBounded_range_of_tendsto_cofinite {f : β → α} {a : α} (hf : Tendsto f cofinite (𝓝 a)) :
IsBounded (range f) :=
isBounded_range_of_tendsto_cofinite_uniformity <|
(hf.prod_map hf).mono_right <| nhds_prod_eq.symm.trans_le (nhds_le_uniformity a)
#align metric.bounded_range_of_tendsto_cofinite Metric.isBounded_range_of_tendsto_cofinite
theorem isBounded_of_compactSpace [CompactSpace α] : IsBounded s :=
isCompact_univ.isBounded.subset (subset_univ _)
#align metric.bounded_of_compact_space Metric.isBounded_of_compactSpace
theorem isBounded_range_of_tendsto (u : ℕ → α) {x : α} (hu : Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 x)) :
IsBounded (range u) :=
hu.cauchySeq.isBounded_range
#align metric.bounded_range_of_tendsto Metric.isBounded_range_of_tendsto
theorem disjoint_nhds_cobounded (x : α) : Disjoint (𝓝 x) (cobounded α) :=
disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem disjoint_compl_right (ball_mem_nhds _ one_pos) isBounded_ball
theorem disjoint_cobounded_nhds (x : α) : Disjoint (cobounded α) (𝓝 x) :=
(disjoint_nhds_cobounded x).symm
theorem disjoint_nhdsSet_cobounded {s : Set α} (hs : IsCompact s) : Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) (cobounded α) :=
hs.disjoint_nhdsSet_left.2 fun _ _ ↦ disjoint_nhds_cobounded _
theorem disjoint_cobounded_nhdsSet {s : Set α} (hs : IsCompact s) : Disjoint (cobounded α) (𝓝ˢ s) :=
(disjoint_nhdsSet_cobounded hs).symm
theorem exists_isBounded_image_of_tendsto {α β : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace β]
{l : Filter α} {f : α → β} {x : β} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) :
∃ s ∈ l, IsBounded (f '' s) :=
(l.basis_sets.map f).disjoint_iff_left.mp <| (disjoint_nhds_cobounded x).mono_left hf
theorem exists_isOpen_isBounded_image_inter_of_isCompact_of_forall_continuousWithinAt
[TopologicalSpace β] {k s : Set β} {f : β → α} (hk : IsCompact k)
(hf : ∀ x ∈ k, ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
∃ t, k ⊆ t ∧ IsOpen t ∧ IsBounded (f '' (t ∩ s)) := by
have : Disjoint (𝓝ˢ k ⊓ 𝓟 s) (comap f (cobounded α)) := by
rw [disjoint_assoc, inf_comm, hk.disjoint_nhdsSet_left]
exact fun x hx ↦ disjoint_left_comm.2 <|
tendsto_comap.disjoint (disjoint_cobounded_nhds _) (hf x hx)
rcases ((((hasBasis_nhdsSet _).inf_principal _)).disjoint_iff ((basis_sets _).comap _)).1 this
with ⟨U, ⟨hUo, hkU⟩, t, ht, hd⟩
refine ⟨U, hkU, hUo, (isBounded_compl_iff.2 ht).subset ?_⟩
rwa [image_subset_iff, preimage_compl, subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right]
#align metric.exists_is_open_bounded_image_inter_of_is_compact_of_forall_continuous_within_at Metric.exists_isOpen_isBounded_image_inter_of_isCompact_of_forall_continuousWithinAt
theorem exists_isOpen_isBounded_image_of_isCompact_of_forall_continuousAt [TopologicalSpace β]
{k : Set β} {f : β → α} (hk : IsCompact k) (hf : ∀ x ∈ k, ContinuousAt f x) :
∃ t, k ⊆ t ∧ IsOpen t ∧ IsBounded (f '' t) := by
simp_rw [← continuousWithinAt_univ] at hf
simpa only [inter_univ] using
exists_isOpen_isBounded_image_inter_of_isCompact_of_forall_continuousWithinAt hk hf
#align metric.exists_is_open_bounded_image_of_is_compact_of_forall_continuous_at Metric.exists_isOpen_isBounded_image_of_isCompact_of_forall_continuousAt
theorem exists_isOpen_isBounded_image_inter_of_isCompact_of_continuousOn [TopologicalSpace β]
{k s : Set β} {f : β → α} (hk : IsCompact k) (hks : k ⊆ s) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
∃ t, k ⊆ t ∧ IsOpen t ∧ IsBounded (f '' (t ∩ s)) :=
exists_isOpen_isBounded_image_inter_of_isCompact_of_forall_continuousWithinAt hk fun x hx =>
hf x (hks hx)
#align metric.exists_is_open_bounded_image_inter_of_is_compact_of_continuous_on Metric.exists_isOpen_isBounded_image_inter_of_isCompact_of_continuousOn
theorem exists_isOpen_isBounded_image_of_isCompact_of_continuousOn [TopologicalSpace β]
{k s : Set β} {f : β → α} (hk : IsCompact k) (hs : IsOpen s) (hks : k ⊆ s)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) : ∃ t, k ⊆ t ∧ IsOpen t ∧ IsBounded (f '' t) :=
exists_isOpen_isBounded_image_of_isCompact_of_forall_continuousAt hk fun _x hx =>
hf.continuousAt (hs.mem_nhds (hks hx))
#align metric.exists_is_open_bounded_image_of_is_compact_of_continuous_on Metric.exists_isOpen_isBounded_image_of_isCompact_of_continuousOn
theorem isCompact_of_isClosed_isBounded [ProperSpace α] (hc : IsClosed s) (hb : IsBounded s) :
IsCompact s := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | ⟨x, -⟩)
· exact isCompact_empty
· rcases hb.subset_closedBall x with ⟨r, hr⟩
exact (isCompact_closedBall x r).of_isClosed_subset hc hr
#align metric.is_compact_of_is_closed_bounded Metric.isCompact_of_isClosed_isBounded
theorem _root_.Bornology.IsBounded.isCompact_closure [ProperSpace α] (h : IsBounded s) :
IsCompact (closure s) :=
isCompact_of_isClosed_isBounded isClosed_closure h.closure
#align metric.bounded.is_compact_closure Bornology.IsBounded.isCompact_closure
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: assume `[MetricSpace α]`
-- instead of `[PseudoMetricSpace α] [T2Space α]`
theorem isCompact_iff_isClosed_bounded [T2Space α] [ProperSpace α] :
IsCompact s ↔ IsClosed s ∧ IsBounded s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.isClosed, h.isBounded⟩, fun h => isCompact_of_isClosed_isBounded h.1 h.2⟩
#align metric.is_compact_iff_is_closed_bounded Metric.isCompact_iff_isClosed_bounded
theorem compactSpace_iff_isBounded_univ [ProperSpace α] :
CompactSpace α ↔ IsBounded (univ : Set α) :=
⟨@isBounded_of_compactSpace α _ _, fun hb => ⟨isCompact_of_isClosed_isBounded isClosed_univ hb⟩⟩
#align metric.compact_space_iff_bounded_univ Metric.compactSpace_iff_isBounded_univ
section Diam
variable {s : Set α} {x y z : α}
noncomputable def diam (s : Set α) : ℝ :=
ENNReal.toReal (EMetric.diam s)
#align metric.diam Metric.diam
theorem diam_nonneg : 0 ≤ diam s :=
ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
#align metric.diam_nonneg Metric.diam_nonneg
theorem diam_subsingleton (hs : s.Subsingleton) : diam s = 0 := by
simp only [diam, EMetric.diam_subsingleton hs, ENNReal.zero_toReal]
#align metric.diam_subsingleton Metric.diam_subsingleton
@[simp]
theorem diam_empty : diam (∅ : Set α) = 0 :=
diam_subsingleton subsingleton_empty
#align metric.diam_empty Metric.diam_empty
@[simp]
theorem diam_singleton : diam ({x} : Set α) = 0 :=
diam_subsingleton subsingleton_singleton
#align metric.diam_singleton Metric.diam_singleton
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem diam_one [One α] : diam (1 : Set α) = 0 :=
diam_singleton
#align metric.diam_one Metric.diam_one
#align metric.diam_zero Metric.diam_zero
-- Does not work as a simp-lemma, since {x, y} reduces to (insert y {x})
theorem diam_pair : diam ({x, y} : Set α) = dist x y := by
simp only [diam, EMetric.diam_pair, dist_edist]
#align metric.diam_pair Metric.diam_pair
-- Does not work as a simp-lemma, since {x, y, z} reduces to (insert z (insert y {x}))
theorem diam_triple :
Metric.diam ({x, y, z} : Set α) = max (max (dist x y) (dist x z)) (dist y z) := by
simp only [Metric.diam, EMetric.diam_triple, dist_edist]
rw [ENNReal.toReal_max, ENNReal.toReal_max] <;> apply_rules [ne_of_lt, edist_lt_top, max_lt]
#align metric.diam_triple Metric.diam_triple
theorem ediam_le_of_forall_dist_le {C : ℝ} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist x y ≤ C) :
EMetric.diam s ≤ ENNReal.ofReal C :=
EMetric.diam_le fun x hx y hy => (edist_dist x y).symm ▸ ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal (h x hx y hy)
#align metric.ediam_le_of_forall_dist_le Metric.ediam_le_of_forall_dist_le
theorem diam_le_of_forall_dist_le {C : ℝ} (h₀ : 0 ≤ C) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist x y ≤ C) :
diam s ≤ C :=
ENNReal.toReal_le_of_le_ofReal h₀ (ediam_le_of_forall_dist_le h)
#align metric.diam_le_of_forall_dist_le Metric.diam_le_of_forall_dist_le
theorem diam_le_of_forall_dist_le_of_nonempty (hs : s.Nonempty) {C : ℝ}
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist x y ≤ C) : diam s ≤ C :=
have h₀ : 0 ≤ C :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hs
le_trans dist_nonneg (h x hx x hx)
diam_le_of_forall_dist_le h₀ h
#align metric.diam_le_of_forall_dist_le_of_nonempty Metric.diam_le_of_forall_dist_le_of_nonempty
theorem dist_le_diam_of_mem' (h : EMetric.diam s ≠ ⊤) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) :
dist x y ≤ diam s := by
rw [diam, dist_edist]
rw [ENNReal.toReal_le_toReal (edist_ne_top _ _) h]
exact EMetric.edist_le_diam_of_mem hx hy
#align metric.dist_le_diam_of_mem' Metric.dist_le_diam_of_mem'
theorem isBounded_iff_ediam_ne_top : IsBounded s ↔ EMetric.diam s ≠ ⊤ :=
isBounded_iff.trans <| Iff.intro
(fun ⟨_C, hC⟩ => ne_top_of_le_ne_top ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top <| ediam_le_of_forall_dist_le hC)
fun h => ⟨diam s, fun _x hx _y hy => dist_le_diam_of_mem' h hx hy⟩
#align metric.bounded_iff_ediam_ne_top Metric.isBounded_iff_ediam_ne_top
alias ⟨_root_.Bornology.IsBounded.ediam_ne_top, _⟩ := isBounded_iff_ediam_ne_top
#align metric.bounded.ediam_ne_top Bornology.IsBounded.ediam_ne_top
theorem ediam_eq_top_iff_unbounded : EMetric.diam s = ⊤ ↔ ¬IsBounded s :=
isBounded_iff_ediam_ne_top.not_left.symm
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Bounded.lean | 476 | 479 | theorem ediam_univ_eq_top_iff_noncompact [ProperSpace α] :
EMetric.diam (univ : Set α) = ∞ ↔ NoncompactSpace α := by |
rw [← not_compactSpace_iff, compactSpace_iff_isBounded_univ, isBounded_iff_ediam_ne_top,
Classical.not_not]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.Constructions
#align_import algebra.linear_recurrence from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"039a089d2a4b93c761b234f3e5f5aeb752bac60f"
noncomputable section
open Finset
open Polynomial
structure LinearRecurrence (α : Type*) [CommSemiring α] where
order : ℕ
coeffs : Fin order → α
#align linear_recurrence LinearRecurrence
instance (α : Type*) [CommSemiring α] : Inhabited (LinearRecurrence α) :=
⟨⟨0, default⟩⟩
namespace LinearRecurrence
section CommSemiring
variable {α : Type*} [CommSemiring α] (E : LinearRecurrence α)
def IsSolution (u : ℕ → α) :=
∀ n, u (n + E.order) = ∑ i, E.coeffs i * u (n + i)
#align linear_recurrence.is_solution LinearRecurrence.IsSolution
def mkSol (init : Fin E.order → α) : ℕ → α
| n =>
if h : n < E.order then init ⟨n, h⟩
else
∑ k : Fin E.order,
have _ : n - E.order + k < n := by
rw [add_comm, ← add_tsub_assoc_of_le (not_lt.mp h), tsub_lt_iff_left]
· exact add_lt_add_right k.is_lt n
· convert add_le_add (zero_le (k : ℕ)) (not_lt.mp h)
simp only [zero_add]
E.coeffs k * mkSol init (n - E.order + k)
#align linear_recurrence.mk_sol LinearRecurrence.mkSol
theorem is_sol_mkSol (init : Fin E.order → α) : E.IsSolution (E.mkSol init) := by
intro n
rw [mkSol]
simp
#align linear_recurrence.is_sol_mk_sol LinearRecurrence.is_sol_mkSol
theorem mkSol_eq_init (init : Fin E.order → α) : ∀ n : Fin E.order, E.mkSol init n = init n := by
intro n
rw [mkSol]
simp only [n.is_lt, dif_pos, Fin.mk_val, Fin.eta]
#align linear_recurrence.mk_sol_eq_init LinearRecurrence.mkSol_eq_init
| Mathlib/Algebra/LinearRecurrence.lean | 100 | 115 | theorem eq_mk_of_is_sol_of_eq_init {u : ℕ → α} {init : Fin E.order → α} (h : E.IsSolution u)
(heq : ∀ n : Fin E.order, u n = init n) : ∀ n, u n = E.mkSol init n := by |
intro n
rw [mkSol]
split_ifs with h'
· exact mod_cast heq ⟨n, h'⟩
simp only
rw [← tsub_add_cancel_of_le (le_of_not_lt h'), h (n - E.order)]
congr with k
have : n - E.order + k < n := by
rw [add_comm, ← add_tsub_assoc_of_le (not_lt.mp h'), tsub_lt_iff_left]
· exact add_lt_add_right k.is_lt n
· convert add_le_add (zero_le (k : ℕ)) (not_lt.mp h')
simp only [zero_add]
rw [eq_mk_of_is_sol_of_eq_init h heq (n - E.order + k)]
simp
|
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bits
import Mathlib.Order.Lattice
#align_import data.nat.size from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"18a5306c091183ac90884daa9373fa3b178e8607"
namespace Nat
section
set_option linter.deprecated false
theorem shiftLeft_eq_mul_pow (m) : ∀ n, m <<< n = m * 2 ^ n := shiftLeft_eq _
#align nat.shiftl_eq_mul_pow Nat.shiftLeft_eq_mul_pow
theorem shiftLeft'_tt_eq_mul_pow (m) : ∀ n, shiftLeft' true m n + 1 = (m + 1) * 2 ^ n
| 0 => by simp [shiftLeft', pow_zero, Nat.one_mul]
| k + 1 => by
change bit1 (shiftLeft' true m k) + 1 = (m + 1) * (2 ^ k * 2)
rw [bit1_val]
change 2 * (shiftLeft' true m k + 1) = _
rw [shiftLeft'_tt_eq_mul_pow m k, mul_left_comm, mul_comm 2]
#align nat.shiftl'_tt_eq_mul_pow Nat.shiftLeft'_tt_eq_mul_pow
end
#align nat.one_shiftl Nat.one_shiftLeft
#align nat.zero_shiftl Nat.zero_shiftLeft
#align nat.shiftr_eq_div_pow Nat.shiftRight_eq_div_pow
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Size.lean | 38 | 39 | theorem shiftLeft'_ne_zero_left (b) {m} (h : m ≠ 0) (n) : shiftLeft' b m n ≠ 0 := by |
induction n <;> simp [bit_ne_zero, shiftLeft', *]
|
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.FilterProduct
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
#align_import data.real.hyperreal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
open scoped Classical
open Filter Germ Topology
def Hyperreal : Type :=
Germ (hyperfilter ℕ : Filter ℕ) ℝ deriving Inhabited
#align hyperreal Hyperreal
namespace Hyperreal
@[inherit_doc] notation "ℝ*" => Hyperreal
noncomputable instance : LinearOrderedField ℝ* :=
inferInstanceAs (LinearOrderedField (Germ _ _))
@[coe] def ofReal : ℝ → ℝ* := const
noncomputable instance : CoeTC ℝ ℝ* := ⟨ofReal⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_coe {x y : ℝ} : (x : ℝ*) = y ↔ x = y :=
Germ.const_inj
#align hyperreal.coe_eq_coe Hyperreal.coe_eq_coe
theorem coe_ne_coe {x y : ℝ} : (x : ℝ*) ≠ y ↔ x ≠ y :=
coe_eq_coe.not
#align hyperreal.coe_ne_coe Hyperreal.coe_ne_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_zero {x : ℝ} : (x : ℝ*) = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
coe_eq_coe
#align hyperreal.coe_eq_zero Hyperreal.coe_eq_zero
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_one {x : ℝ} : (x : ℝ*) = 1 ↔ x = 1 :=
coe_eq_coe
#align hyperreal.coe_eq_one Hyperreal.coe_eq_one
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_ne_zero {x : ℝ} : (x : ℝ*) ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
coe_ne_coe
#align hyperreal.coe_ne_zero Hyperreal.coe_ne_zero
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_ne_one {x : ℝ} : (x : ℝ*) ≠ 1 ↔ x ≠ 1 :=
coe_ne_coe
#align hyperreal.coe_ne_one Hyperreal.coe_ne_one
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_one : ↑(1 : ℝ) = (1 : ℝ*) :=
rfl
#align hyperreal.coe_one Hyperreal.coe_one
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : ℝ*) :=
rfl
#align hyperreal.coe_zero Hyperreal.coe_zero
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inv (x : ℝ) : ↑x⁻¹ = (x⁻¹ : ℝ*) :=
rfl
#align hyperreal.coe_inv Hyperreal.coe_inv
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x) = (-x : ℝ*) :=
rfl
#align hyperreal.coe_neg Hyperreal.coe_neg
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y) = (x + y : ℝ*) :=
rfl
#align hyperreal.coe_add Hyperreal.coe_add
#noalign hyperreal.coe_bit0
#noalign hyperreal.coe_bit1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
((no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : ℝ)) : ℝ*) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x * y) = (x * y : ℝ*) :=
rfl
#align hyperreal.coe_mul Hyperreal.coe_mul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_div (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x / y) = (x / y : ℝ*) :=
rfl
#align hyperreal.coe_div Hyperreal.coe_div
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y) = (x - y : ℝ*) :=
rfl
#align hyperreal.coe_sub Hyperreal.coe_sub
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_le_coe {x y : ℝ} : (x : ℝ*) ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y :=
Germ.const_le_iff
#align hyperreal.coe_le_coe Hyperreal.coe_le_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_lt_coe {x y : ℝ} : (x : ℝ*) < y ↔ x < y :=
Germ.const_lt_iff
#align hyperreal.coe_lt_coe Hyperreal.coe_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nonneg {x : ℝ} : 0 ≤ (x : ℝ*) ↔ 0 ≤ x :=
coe_le_coe
#align hyperreal.coe_nonneg Hyperreal.coe_nonneg
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_pos {x : ℝ} : 0 < (x : ℝ*) ↔ 0 < x :=
coe_lt_coe
#align hyperreal.coe_pos Hyperreal.coe_pos
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_abs (x : ℝ) : ((|x| : ℝ) : ℝ*) = |↑x| :=
const_abs x
#align hyperreal.coe_abs Hyperreal.coe_abs
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_max (x y : ℝ) : ((max x y : ℝ) : ℝ*) = max ↑x ↑y :=
Germ.const_max _ _
#align hyperreal.coe_max Hyperreal.coe_max
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_min (x y : ℝ) : ((min x y : ℝ) : ℝ*) = min ↑x ↑y :=
Germ.const_min _ _
#align hyperreal.coe_min Hyperreal.coe_min
def ofSeq (f : ℕ → ℝ) : ℝ* := (↑f : Germ (hyperfilter ℕ : Filter ℕ) ℝ)
#align hyperreal.of_seq Hyperreal.ofSeq
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
theorem ofSeq_surjective : Function.Surjective ofSeq := Quot.exists_rep
theorem ofSeq_lt_ofSeq {f g : ℕ → ℝ} : ofSeq f < ofSeq g ↔ ∀ᶠ n in hyperfilter ℕ, f n < g n :=
Germ.coe_lt
noncomputable def epsilon : ℝ* :=
ofSeq fun n => n⁻¹
#align hyperreal.epsilon Hyperreal.epsilon
noncomputable def omega : ℝ* := ofSeq Nat.cast
#align hyperreal.omega Hyperreal.omega
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "ε" => Hyperreal.epsilon
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "ω" => Hyperreal.omega
@[simp]
theorem inv_omega : ω⁻¹ = ε :=
rfl
#align hyperreal.inv_omega Hyperreal.inv_omega
@[simp]
theorem inv_epsilon : ε⁻¹ = ω :=
@inv_inv _ _ ω
#align hyperreal.inv_epsilon Hyperreal.inv_epsilon
theorem omega_pos : 0 < ω :=
Germ.coe_pos.2 <| Nat.hyperfilter_le_atTop <| (eventually_gt_atTop 0).mono fun _ ↦
Nat.cast_pos.2
#align hyperreal.omega_pos Hyperreal.omega_pos
theorem epsilon_pos : 0 < ε :=
inv_pos_of_pos omega_pos
#align hyperreal.epsilon_pos Hyperreal.epsilon_pos
theorem epsilon_ne_zero : ε ≠ 0 :=
epsilon_pos.ne'
#align hyperreal.epsilon_ne_zero Hyperreal.epsilon_ne_zero
theorem omega_ne_zero : ω ≠ 0 :=
omega_pos.ne'
#align hyperreal.omega_ne_zero Hyperreal.omega_ne_zero
theorem epsilon_mul_omega : ε * ω = 1 :=
@inv_mul_cancel _ _ ω omega_ne_zero
#align hyperreal.epsilon_mul_omega Hyperreal.epsilon_mul_omega
theorem lt_of_tendsto_zero_of_pos {f : ℕ → ℝ} (hf : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 0)) :
∀ {r : ℝ}, 0 < r → ofSeq f < (r : ℝ*) := fun hr ↦
ofSeq_lt_ofSeq.2 <| (hf.eventually <| gt_mem_nhds hr).filter_mono Nat.hyperfilter_le_atTop
#align hyperreal.lt_of_tendsto_zero_of_pos Hyperreal.lt_of_tendsto_zero_of_pos
theorem neg_lt_of_tendsto_zero_of_pos {f : ℕ → ℝ} (hf : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 0)) :
∀ {r : ℝ}, 0 < r → (-r : ℝ*) < ofSeq f := fun hr =>
have hg := hf.neg
neg_lt_of_neg_lt (by rw [neg_zero] at hg; exact lt_of_tendsto_zero_of_pos hg hr)
#align hyperreal.neg_lt_of_tendsto_zero_of_pos Hyperreal.neg_lt_of_tendsto_zero_of_pos
theorem gt_of_tendsto_zero_of_neg {f : ℕ → ℝ} (hf : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 0)) :
∀ {r : ℝ}, r < 0 → (r : ℝ*) < ofSeq f := fun {r} hr => by
rw [← neg_neg r, coe_neg]; exact neg_lt_of_tendsto_zero_of_pos hf (neg_pos.mpr hr)
#align hyperreal.gt_of_tendsto_zero_of_neg Hyperreal.gt_of_tendsto_zero_of_neg
theorem epsilon_lt_pos (x : ℝ) : 0 < x → ε < x :=
lt_of_tendsto_zero_of_pos tendsto_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
#align hyperreal.epsilon_lt_pos Hyperreal.epsilon_lt_pos
def IsSt (x : ℝ*) (r : ℝ) :=
∀ δ : ℝ, 0 < δ → (r - δ : ℝ*) < x ∧ x < r + δ
#align hyperreal.is_st Hyperreal.IsSt
noncomputable def st : ℝ* → ℝ := fun x => if h : ∃ r, IsSt x r then Classical.choose h else 0
#align hyperreal.st Hyperreal.st
def Infinitesimal (x : ℝ*) :=
IsSt x 0
#align hyperreal.infinitesimal Hyperreal.Infinitesimal
def InfinitePos (x : ℝ*) :=
∀ r : ℝ, ↑r < x
#align hyperreal.infinite_pos Hyperreal.InfinitePos
def InfiniteNeg (x : ℝ*) :=
∀ r : ℝ, x < r
#align hyperreal.infinite_neg Hyperreal.InfiniteNeg
def Infinite (x : ℝ*) :=
InfinitePos x ∨ InfiniteNeg x
#align hyperreal.infinite Hyperreal.Infinite
theorem isSt_ofSeq_iff_tendsto {f : ℕ → ℝ} {r : ℝ} :
IsSt (ofSeq f) r ↔ Tendsto f (hyperfilter ℕ) (𝓝 r) :=
Iff.trans (forall₂_congr fun _ _ ↦ (ofSeq_lt_ofSeq.and ofSeq_lt_ofSeq).trans eventually_and.symm)
(nhds_basis_Ioo_pos _).tendsto_right_iff.symm
theorem isSt_iff_tendsto {x : ℝ*} {r : ℝ} : IsSt x r ↔ x.Tendsto (𝓝 r) := by
rcases ofSeq_surjective x with ⟨f, rfl⟩
exact isSt_ofSeq_iff_tendsto
theorem isSt_of_tendsto {f : ℕ → ℝ} {r : ℝ} (hf : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 r)) : IsSt (ofSeq f) r :=
isSt_ofSeq_iff_tendsto.2 <| hf.mono_left Nat.hyperfilter_le_atTop
#align hyperreal.is_st_of_tendsto Hyperreal.isSt_of_tendsto
-- Porting note: moved up, renamed
protected theorem IsSt.lt {x y : ℝ*} {r s : ℝ} (hxr : IsSt x r) (hys : IsSt y s) (hrs : r < s) :
x < y := by
rcases ofSeq_surjective x with ⟨f, rfl⟩
rcases ofSeq_surjective y with ⟨g, rfl⟩
rw [isSt_ofSeq_iff_tendsto] at hxr hys
exact ofSeq_lt_ofSeq.2 <| hxr.eventually_lt hys hrs
#align hyperreal.lt_of_is_st_lt Hyperreal.IsSt.lt
theorem IsSt.unique {x : ℝ*} {r s : ℝ} (hr : IsSt x r) (hs : IsSt x s) : r = s := by
rcases ofSeq_surjective x with ⟨f, rfl⟩
rw [isSt_ofSeq_iff_tendsto] at hr hs
exact tendsto_nhds_unique hr hs
#align hyperreal.is_st_unique Hyperreal.IsSt.unique
theorem IsSt.st_eq {x : ℝ*} {r : ℝ} (hxr : IsSt x r) : st x = r := by
have h : ∃ r, IsSt x r := ⟨r, hxr⟩
rw [st, dif_pos h]
exact (Classical.choose_spec h).unique hxr
#align hyperreal.st_of_is_st Hyperreal.IsSt.st_eq
theorem IsSt.not_infinite {x : ℝ*} {r : ℝ} (h : IsSt x r) : ¬Infinite x := fun hi ↦
hi.elim (fun hp ↦ lt_asymm (h 1 one_pos).2 (hp (r + 1))) fun hn ↦
lt_asymm (h 1 one_pos).1 (hn (r - 1))
theorem not_infinite_of_exists_st {x : ℝ*} : (∃ r : ℝ, IsSt x r) → ¬Infinite x := fun ⟨_r, hr⟩ =>
hr.not_infinite
#align hyperreal.not_infinite_of_exists_st Hyperreal.not_infinite_of_exists_st
theorem Infinite.st_eq {x : ℝ*} (hi : Infinite x) : st x = 0 :=
dif_neg fun ⟨_r, hr⟩ ↦ hr.not_infinite hi
#align hyperreal.st_infinite Hyperreal.Infinite.st_eq
theorem isSt_sSup {x : ℝ*} (hni : ¬Infinite x) : IsSt x (sSup { y : ℝ | (y : ℝ*) < x }) :=
let S : Set ℝ := { y : ℝ | (y : ℝ*) < x }
let R : ℝ := sSup S
let ⟨r₁, hr₁⟩ := not_forall.mp (not_or.mp hni).2
let ⟨r₂, hr₂⟩ := not_forall.mp (not_or.mp hni).1
have HR₁ : S.Nonempty :=
⟨r₁ - 1, lt_of_lt_of_le (coe_lt_coe.2 <| sub_one_lt _) (not_lt.mp hr₁)⟩
have HR₂ : BddAbove S :=
⟨r₂, fun _y hy => le_of_lt (coe_lt_coe.1 (lt_of_lt_of_le hy (not_lt.mp hr₂)))⟩
fun δ hδ =>
⟨lt_of_not_le fun c =>
have hc : ∀ y ∈ S, y ≤ R - δ := fun _y hy =>
coe_le_coe.1 <| le_of_lt <| lt_of_lt_of_le hy c
not_lt_of_le (csSup_le HR₁ hc) <| sub_lt_self R hδ,
lt_of_not_le fun c =>
have hc : ↑(R + δ / 2) < x :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (add_lt_add_left (coe_lt_coe.2 (half_lt_self hδ)) R) c
not_lt_of_le (le_csSup HR₂ hc) <| (lt_add_iff_pos_right _).mpr <| half_pos hδ⟩
#align hyperreal.is_st_Sup Hyperreal.isSt_sSup
theorem exists_st_of_not_infinite {x : ℝ*} (hni : ¬Infinite x) : ∃ r : ℝ, IsSt x r :=
⟨sSup { y : ℝ | (y : ℝ*) < x }, isSt_sSup hni⟩
#align hyperreal.exists_st_of_not_infinite Hyperreal.exists_st_of_not_infinite
theorem st_eq_sSup {x : ℝ*} : st x = sSup { y : ℝ | (y : ℝ*) < x } := by
rcases _root_.em (Infinite x) with (hx|hx)
· rw [hx.st_eq]
cases hx with
| inl hx =>
convert Real.sSup_univ.symm
exact Set.eq_univ_of_forall hx
| inr hx =>
convert Real.sSup_empty.symm
exact Set.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem fun y hy ↦ hy.out.not_lt (hx _)
· exact (isSt_sSup hx).st_eq
#align hyperreal.st_eq_Sup Hyperreal.st_eq_sSup
theorem exists_st_iff_not_infinite {x : ℝ*} : (∃ r : ℝ, IsSt x r) ↔ ¬Infinite x :=
⟨not_infinite_of_exists_st, exists_st_of_not_infinite⟩
#align hyperreal.exists_st_iff_not_infinite Hyperreal.exists_st_iff_not_infinite
theorem infinite_iff_not_exists_st {x : ℝ*} : Infinite x ↔ ¬∃ r : ℝ, IsSt x r :=
iff_not_comm.mp exists_st_iff_not_infinite
#align hyperreal.infinite_iff_not_exists_st Hyperreal.infinite_iff_not_exists_st
theorem IsSt.isSt_st {x : ℝ*} {r : ℝ} (hxr : IsSt x r) : IsSt x (st x) := by
rwa [hxr.st_eq]
#align hyperreal.is_st_st_of_is_st Hyperreal.IsSt.isSt_st
theorem isSt_st_of_exists_st {x : ℝ*} (hx : ∃ r : ℝ, IsSt x r) : IsSt x (st x) :=
let ⟨_r, hr⟩ := hx; hr.isSt_st
#align hyperreal.is_st_st_of_exists_st Hyperreal.isSt_st_of_exists_st
theorem isSt_st' {x : ℝ*} (hx : ¬Infinite x) : IsSt x (st x) :=
(isSt_sSup hx).isSt_st
#align hyperreal.is_st_st' Hyperreal.isSt_st'
theorem isSt_st {x : ℝ*} (hx : st x ≠ 0) : IsSt x (st x) :=
isSt_st' <| mt Infinite.st_eq hx
#align hyperreal.is_st_st Hyperreal.isSt_st
theorem isSt_refl_real (r : ℝ) : IsSt r r := isSt_ofSeq_iff_tendsto.2 tendsto_const_nhds
#align hyperreal.is_st_refl_real Hyperreal.isSt_refl_real
theorem st_id_real (r : ℝ) : st r = r := (isSt_refl_real r).st_eq
#align hyperreal.st_id_real Hyperreal.st_id_real
theorem eq_of_isSt_real {r s : ℝ} : IsSt r s → r = s :=
(isSt_refl_real r).unique
#align hyperreal.eq_of_is_st_real Hyperreal.eq_of_isSt_real
theorem isSt_real_iff_eq {r s : ℝ} : IsSt r s ↔ r = s :=
⟨eq_of_isSt_real, fun hrs => hrs ▸ isSt_refl_real r⟩
#align hyperreal.is_st_real_iff_eq Hyperreal.isSt_real_iff_eq
theorem isSt_symm_real {r s : ℝ} : IsSt r s ↔ IsSt s r := by
rw [isSt_real_iff_eq, isSt_real_iff_eq, eq_comm]
#align hyperreal.is_st_symm_real Hyperreal.isSt_symm_real
theorem isSt_trans_real {r s t : ℝ} : IsSt r s → IsSt s t → IsSt r t := by
rw [isSt_real_iff_eq, isSt_real_iff_eq, isSt_real_iff_eq]; exact Eq.trans
#align hyperreal.is_st_trans_real Hyperreal.isSt_trans_real
theorem isSt_inj_real {r₁ r₂ s : ℝ} (h1 : IsSt r₁ s) (h2 : IsSt r₂ s) : r₁ = r₂ :=
Eq.trans (eq_of_isSt_real h1) (eq_of_isSt_real h2).symm
#align hyperreal.is_st_inj_real Hyperreal.isSt_inj_real
theorem isSt_iff_abs_sub_lt_delta {x : ℝ*} {r : ℝ} : IsSt x r ↔ ∀ δ : ℝ, 0 < δ → |x - ↑r| < δ := by
simp only [abs_sub_lt_iff, sub_lt_iff_lt_add, IsSt, and_comm, add_comm]
#align hyperreal.is_st_iff_abs_sub_lt_delta Hyperreal.isSt_iff_abs_sub_lt_delta
theorem IsSt.map {x : ℝ*} {r : ℝ} (hxr : IsSt x r) {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : ContinuousAt f r) :
IsSt (x.map f) (f r) := by
rcases ofSeq_surjective x with ⟨g, rfl⟩
exact isSt_ofSeq_iff_tendsto.2 <| hf.tendsto.comp (isSt_ofSeq_iff_tendsto.1 hxr)
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Hyperreal.lean | 397 | 402 | theorem IsSt.map₂ {x y : ℝ*} {r s : ℝ} (hxr : IsSt x r) (hys : IsSt y s) {f : ℝ → ℝ → ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousAt (Function.uncurry f) (r, s)) : IsSt (x.map₂ f y) (f r s) := by |
rcases ofSeq_surjective x with ⟨x, rfl⟩
rcases ofSeq_surjective y with ⟨y, rfl⟩
rw [isSt_ofSeq_iff_tendsto] at hxr hys
exact isSt_ofSeq_iff_tendsto.2 <| hf.tendsto.comp (hxr.prod_mk_nhds hys)
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.FullyFaithful
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.FullSubcategory
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Whiskering
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EssentialImage
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Slice
#align_import category_theory.equivalence from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9aba7801eeecebb61f58a5763c2b6dd1b47dc6ef"
namespace CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Functor NatIso Category
-- declare the `v`'s first; see `CategoryTheory.Category` for an explanation
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
@[ext]
structure Equivalence (C : Type u₁) (D : Type u₂) [Category.{v₁} C] [Category.{v₂} D] where mk' ::
functor : C ⥤ D
inverse : D ⥤ C
unitIso : 𝟭 C ≅ functor ⋙ inverse
counitIso : inverse ⋙ functor ≅ 𝟭 D
functor_unitIso_comp :
∀ X : C, functor.map (unitIso.hom.app X) ≫ counitIso.hom.app (functor.obj X) =
𝟙 (functor.obj X) := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.equivalence CategoryTheory.Equivalence
#align category_theory.equivalence.unit_iso CategoryTheory.Equivalence.unitIso
#align category_theory.equivalence.counit_iso CategoryTheory.Equivalence.counitIso
#align category_theory.equivalence.functor_unit_iso_comp CategoryTheory.Equivalence.functor_unitIso_comp
infixr:10 " ≌ " => Equivalence
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
namespace Equivalence
abbrev unit (e : C ≌ D) : 𝟭 C ⟶ e.functor ⋙ e.inverse :=
e.unitIso.hom
#align category_theory.equivalence.unit CategoryTheory.Equivalence.unit
abbrev counit (e : C ≌ D) : e.inverse ⋙ e.functor ⟶ 𝟭 D :=
e.counitIso.hom
#align category_theory.equivalence.counit CategoryTheory.Equivalence.counit
abbrev unitInv (e : C ≌ D) : e.functor ⋙ e.inverse ⟶ 𝟭 C :=
e.unitIso.inv
#align category_theory.equivalence.unit_inv CategoryTheory.Equivalence.unitInv
abbrev counitInv (e : C ≌ D) : 𝟭 D ⟶ e.inverse ⋙ e.functor :=
e.counitIso.inv
#align category_theory.equivalence.counit_inv CategoryTheory.Equivalence.counitInv
@[simp]
theorem Equivalence_mk'_unit (functor inverse unit_iso counit_iso f) :
(⟨functor, inverse, unit_iso, counit_iso, f⟩ : C ≌ D).unit = unit_iso.hom :=
rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.equivalence_mk'_unit CategoryTheory.Equivalence.Equivalence_mk'_unit
@[simp]
theorem Equivalence_mk'_counit (functor inverse unit_iso counit_iso f) :
(⟨functor, inverse, unit_iso, counit_iso, f⟩ : C ≌ D).counit = counit_iso.hom :=
rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.equivalence_mk'_counit CategoryTheory.Equivalence.Equivalence_mk'_counit
@[simp]
theorem Equivalence_mk'_unitInv (functor inverse unit_iso counit_iso f) :
(⟨functor, inverse, unit_iso, counit_iso, f⟩ : C ≌ D).unitInv = unit_iso.inv :=
rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.equivalence_mk'_unit_inv CategoryTheory.Equivalence.Equivalence_mk'_unitInv
@[simp]
theorem Equivalence_mk'_counitInv (functor inverse unit_iso counit_iso f) :
(⟨functor, inverse, unit_iso, counit_iso, f⟩ : C ≌ D).counitInv = counit_iso.inv :=
rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.equivalence_mk'_counit_inv CategoryTheory.Equivalence.Equivalence_mk'_counitInv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem functor_unit_comp (e : C ≌ D) (X : C) :
e.functor.map (e.unit.app X) ≫ e.counit.app (e.functor.obj X) = 𝟙 (e.functor.obj X) :=
e.functor_unitIso_comp X
#align category_theory.equivalence.functor_unit_comp CategoryTheory.Equivalence.functor_unit_comp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem counitInv_functor_comp (e : C ≌ D) (X : C) :
e.counitInv.app (e.functor.obj X) ≫ e.functor.map (e.unitInv.app X) = 𝟙 (e.functor.obj X) := by
erw [Iso.inv_eq_inv (e.functor.mapIso (e.unitIso.app X) ≪≫ e.counitIso.app (e.functor.obj X))
(Iso.refl _)]
exact e.functor_unit_comp X
#align category_theory.equivalence.counit_inv_functor_comp CategoryTheory.Equivalence.counitInv_functor_comp
theorem counitInv_app_functor (e : C ≌ D) (X : C) :
e.counitInv.app (e.functor.obj X) = e.functor.map (e.unit.app X) := by
symm
erw [← Iso.comp_hom_eq_id (e.counitIso.app _), functor_unit_comp]
rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.counit_inv_app_functor CategoryTheory.Equivalence.counitInv_app_functor
theorem counit_app_functor (e : C ≌ D) (X : C) :
e.counit.app (e.functor.obj X) = e.functor.map (e.unitInv.app X) := by
erw [← Iso.hom_comp_eq_id (e.functor.mapIso (e.unitIso.app X)), functor_unit_comp]
rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.counit_app_functor CategoryTheory.Equivalence.counit_app_functor
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem unit_inverse_comp (e : C ≌ D) (Y : D) :
e.unit.app (e.inverse.obj Y) ≫ e.inverse.map (e.counit.app Y) = 𝟙 (e.inverse.obj Y) := by
rw [← id_comp (e.inverse.map _), ← map_id e.inverse, ← counitInv_functor_comp, map_comp]
dsimp
rw [← Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc (e.unitIso.app _) (e.inverse.map (e.functor.map _)), app_hom, app_inv]
slice_lhs 2 3 => erw [e.unit.naturality]
slice_lhs 1 2 => erw [e.unit.naturality]
slice_lhs 4 4 =>
rw [← Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc (e.inverse.mapIso (e.counitIso.app _)) (e.unitInv.app _)]
slice_lhs 3 4 =>
erw [← map_comp e.inverse, e.counit.naturality]
erw [(e.counitIso.app _).hom_inv_id, map_id]
erw [id_comp]
slice_lhs 2 3 => erw [← map_comp e.inverse, e.counitIso.inv.naturality, map_comp]
slice_lhs 3 4 => erw [e.unitInv.naturality]
slice_lhs 4 5 => erw [← map_comp (e.functor ⋙ e.inverse), (e.unitIso.app _).hom_inv_id, map_id]
erw [id_comp]
slice_lhs 3 4 => erw [← e.unitInv.naturality]
slice_lhs 2 3 =>
erw [← map_comp e.inverse, ← e.counitIso.inv.naturality, (e.counitIso.app _).hom_inv_id,
map_id]
erw [id_comp, (e.unitIso.app _).hom_inv_id]; rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.unit_inverse_comp CategoryTheory.Equivalence.unit_inverse_comp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inverse_counitInv_comp (e : C ≌ D) (Y : D) :
e.inverse.map (e.counitInv.app Y) ≫ e.unitInv.app (e.inverse.obj Y) = 𝟙 (e.inverse.obj Y) := by
erw [Iso.inv_eq_inv (e.unitIso.app (e.inverse.obj Y) ≪≫ e.inverse.mapIso (e.counitIso.app Y))
(Iso.refl _)]
exact e.unit_inverse_comp Y
#align category_theory.equivalence.inverse_counit_inv_comp CategoryTheory.Equivalence.inverse_counitInv_comp
theorem unit_app_inverse (e : C ≌ D) (Y : D) :
e.unit.app (e.inverse.obj Y) = e.inverse.map (e.counitInv.app Y) := by
erw [← Iso.comp_hom_eq_id (e.inverse.mapIso (e.counitIso.app Y)), unit_inverse_comp]
dsimp
#align category_theory.equivalence.unit_app_inverse CategoryTheory.Equivalence.unit_app_inverse
theorem unitInv_app_inverse (e : C ≌ D) (Y : D) :
e.unitInv.app (e.inverse.obj Y) = e.inverse.map (e.counit.app Y) := by
symm
erw [← Iso.hom_comp_eq_id (e.unitIso.app _), unit_inverse_comp]
rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.unit_inv_app_inverse CategoryTheory.Equivalence.unitInv_app_inverse
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem fun_inv_map (e : C ≌ D) (X Y : D) (f : X ⟶ Y) :
e.functor.map (e.inverse.map f) = e.counit.app X ≫ f ≫ e.counitInv.app Y :=
(NatIso.naturality_2 e.counitIso f).symm
#align category_theory.equivalence.fun_inv_map CategoryTheory.Equivalence.fun_inv_map
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem inv_fun_map (e : C ≌ D) (X Y : C) (f : X ⟶ Y) :
e.inverse.map (e.functor.map f) = e.unitInv.app X ≫ f ≫ e.unit.app Y :=
(NatIso.naturality_1 e.unitIso f).symm
#align category_theory.equivalence.inv_fun_map CategoryTheory.Equivalence.inv_fun_map
section
-- In this section we convert an arbitrary equivalence to a half-adjoint equivalence.
variable {F : C ⥤ D} {G : D ⥤ C} (η : 𝟭 C ≅ F ⋙ G) (ε : G ⋙ F ≅ 𝟭 D)
def adjointifyη : 𝟭 C ≅ F ⋙ G := by
calc
𝟭 C ≅ F ⋙ G := η
_ ≅ F ⋙ 𝟭 D ⋙ G := isoWhiskerLeft F (leftUnitor G).symm
_ ≅ F ⋙ (G ⋙ F) ⋙ G := isoWhiskerLeft F (isoWhiskerRight ε.symm G)
_ ≅ F ⋙ G ⋙ F ⋙ G := isoWhiskerLeft F (associator G F G)
_ ≅ (F ⋙ G) ⋙ F ⋙ G := (associator F G (F ⋙ G)).symm
_ ≅ 𝟭 C ⋙ F ⋙ G := isoWhiskerRight η.symm (F ⋙ G)
_ ≅ F ⋙ G := leftUnitor (F ⋙ G)
#align category_theory.equivalence.adjointify_η CategoryTheory.Equivalence.adjointifyη
@[reassoc]
theorem adjointify_η_ε (X : C) :
F.map ((adjointifyη η ε).hom.app X) ≫ ε.hom.app (F.obj X) = 𝟙 (F.obj X) := by
dsimp [adjointifyη,Trans.trans]
simp only [comp_id, assoc, map_comp]
have := ε.hom.naturality (F.map (η.inv.app X)); dsimp at this; rw [this]; clear this
rw [← assoc _ _ (F.map _)]
have := ε.hom.naturality (ε.inv.app <| F.obj X); dsimp at this; rw [this]; clear this
have := (ε.app <| F.obj X).hom_inv_id; dsimp at this; rw [this]; clear this
rw [id_comp]; have := (F.mapIso <| η.app X).hom_inv_id; dsimp at this; rw [this]
#align category_theory.equivalence.adjointify_η_ε CategoryTheory.Equivalence.adjointify_η_ε
end
protected def mk (F : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ C) (η : 𝟭 C ≅ F ⋙ G) (ε : G ⋙ F ≅ 𝟭 D) : C ≌ D :=
⟨F, G, adjointifyη η ε, ε, adjointify_η_ε η ε⟩
#align category_theory.equivalence.mk CategoryTheory.Equivalence.mk
@[refl, simps]
def refl : C ≌ C :=
⟨𝟭 C, 𝟭 C, Iso.refl _, Iso.refl _, fun _ => Category.id_comp _⟩
#align category_theory.equivalence.refl CategoryTheory.Equivalence.refl
instance : Inhabited (C ≌ C) :=
⟨refl⟩
@[symm, simps]
def symm (e : C ≌ D) : D ≌ C :=
⟨e.inverse, e.functor, e.counitIso.symm, e.unitIso.symm, e.inverse_counitInv_comp⟩
#align category_theory.equivalence.symm CategoryTheory.Equivalence.symm
variable {E : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} E]
@[trans, simps]
def trans (e : C ≌ D) (f : D ≌ E) : C ≌ E where
functor := e.functor ⋙ f.functor
inverse := f.inverse ⋙ e.inverse
unitIso := by
refine Iso.trans e.unitIso ?_
exact isoWhiskerLeft e.functor (isoWhiskerRight f.unitIso e.inverse)
counitIso := by
refine Iso.trans ?_ f.counitIso
exact isoWhiskerLeft f.inverse (isoWhiskerRight e.counitIso f.functor)
-- We wouldn't have needed to give this proof if we'd used `Equivalence.mk`,
-- but we choose to avoid using that here, for the sake of good structure projection `simp`
-- lemmas.
functor_unitIso_comp X := by
dsimp
rw [← f.functor.map_comp_assoc, e.functor.map_comp, ← counitInv_app_functor, fun_inv_map,
Iso.inv_hom_id_app_assoc, assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id_app, counit_app_functor, ← Functor.map_comp]
erw [comp_id, Iso.hom_inv_id_app, Functor.map_id]
#align category_theory.equivalence.trans CategoryTheory.Equivalence.trans
def funInvIdAssoc (e : C ≌ D) (F : C ⥤ E) : e.functor ⋙ e.inverse ⋙ F ≅ F :=
(Functor.associator _ _ _).symm ≪≫ isoWhiskerRight e.unitIso.symm F ≪≫ F.leftUnitor
#align category_theory.equivalence.fun_inv_id_assoc CategoryTheory.Equivalence.funInvIdAssoc
@[simp]
theorem funInvIdAssoc_hom_app (e : C ≌ D) (F : C ⥤ E) (X : C) :
(funInvIdAssoc e F).hom.app X = F.map (e.unitInv.app X) := by
dsimp [funInvIdAssoc]
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.equivalence.fun_inv_id_assoc_hom_app CategoryTheory.Equivalence.funInvIdAssoc_hom_app
@[simp]
theorem funInvIdAssoc_inv_app (e : C ≌ D) (F : C ⥤ E) (X : C) :
(funInvIdAssoc e F).inv.app X = F.map (e.unit.app X) := by
dsimp [funInvIdAssoc]
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.equivalence.fun_inv_id_assoc_inv_app CategoryTheory.Equivalence.funInvIdAssoc_inv_app
def invFunIdAssoc (e : C ≌ D) (F : D ⥤ E) : e.inverse ⋙ e.functor ⋙ F ≅ F :=
(Functor.associator _ _ _).symm ≪≫ isoWhiskerRight e.counitIso F ≪≫ F.leftUnitor
#align category_theory.equivalence.inv_fun_id_assoc CategoryTheory.Equivalence.invFunIdAssoc
@[simp]
theorem invFunIdAssoc_hom_app (e : C ≌ D) (F : D ⥤ E) (X : D) :
(invFunIdAssoc e F).hom.app X = F.map (e.counit.app X) := by
dsimp [invFunIdAssoc]
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.equivalence.inv_fun_id_assoc_hom_app CategoryTheory.Equivalence.invFunIdAssoc_hom_app
@[simp]
theorem invFunIdAssoc_inv_app (e : C ≌ D) (F : D ⥤ E) (X : D) :
(invFunIdAssoc e F).inv.app X = F.map (e.counitInv.app X) := by
dsimp [invFunIdAssoc]
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.equivalence.inv_fun_id_assoc_inv_app CategoryTheory.Equivalence.invFunIdAssoc_inv_app
@[simps! functor inverse unitIso counitIso]
def congrLeft (e : C ≌ D) : C ⥤ E ≌ D ⥤ E :=
Equivalence.mk ((whiskeringLeft _ _ _).obj e.inverse) ((whiskeringLeft _ _ _).obj e.functor)
(NatIso.ofComponents fun F => (e.funInvIdAssoc F).symm)
(NatIso.ofComponents fun F => e.invFunIdAssoc F)
#align category_theory.equivalence.congr_left CategoryTheory.Equivalence.congrLeft
@[simps! functor inverse unitIso counitIso]
def congrRight (e : C ≌ D) : E ⥤ C ≌ E ⥤ D :=
Equivalence.mk ((whiskeringRight _ _ _).obj e.functor) ((whiskeringRight _ _ _).obj e.inverse)
(NatIso.ofComponents
fun F => F.rightUnitor.symm ≪≫ isoWhiskerLeft F e.unitIso ≪≫ Functor.associator _ _ _)
(NatIso.ofComponents
fun F => Functor.associator _ _ _ ≪≫ isoWhiskerLeft F e.counitIso ≪≫ F.rightUnitor)
#align category_theory.equivalence.congr_right CategoryTheory.Equivalence.congrRight
section CancellationLemmas
variable (e : C ≌ D)
@[simp]
theorem cancel_unit_right {X Y : C} (f f' : X ⟶ Y) :
f ≫ e.unit.app Y = f' ≫ e.unit.app Y ↔ f = f' := by simp only [cancel_mono]
#align category_theory.equivalence.cancel_unit_right CategoryTheory.Equivalence.cancel_unit_right
@[simp]
theorem cancel_unitInv_right {X Y : C} (f f' : X ⟶ e.inverse.obj (e.functor.obj Y)) :
f ≫ e.unitInv.app Y = f' ≫ e.unitInv.app Y ↔ f = f' := by simp only [cancel_mono]
#align category_theory.equivalence.cancel_unit_inv_right CategoryTheory.Equivalence.cancel_unitInv_right
@[simp]
theorem cancel_counit_right {X Y : D} (f f' : X ⟶ e.functor.obj (e.inverse.obj Y)) :
f ≫ e.counit.app Y = f' ≫ e.counit.app Y ↔ f = f' := by simp only [cancel_mono]
#align category_theory.equivalence.cancel_counit_right CategoryTheory.Equivalence.cancel_counit_right
@[simp]
theorem cancel_counitInv_right {X Y : D} (f f' : X ⟶ Y) :
f ≫ e.counitInv.app Y = f' ≫ e.counitInv.app Y ↔ f = f' := by simp only [cancel_mono]
#align category_theory.equivalence.cancel_counit_inv_right CategoryTheory.Equivalence.cancel_counitInv_right
@[simp]
theorem cancel_unit_right_assoc {W X X' Y : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : X ⟶ Y) (f' : W ⟶ X') (g' : X' ⟶ Y) :
f ≫ g ≫ e.unit.app Y = f' ≫ g' ≫ e.unit.app Y ↔ f ≫ g = f' ≫ g' := by
simp only [← Category.assoc, cancel_mono]
#align category_theory.equivalence.cancel_unit_right_assoc CategoryTheory.Equivalence.cancel_unit_right_assoc
@[simp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Equivalence.lean | 411 | 413 | theorem cancel_counitInv_right_assoc {W X X' Y : D} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : X ⟶ Y) (f' : W ⟶ X')
(g' : X' ⟶ Y) : f ≫ g ≫ e.counitInv.app Y = f' ≫ g' ≫ e.counitInv.app Y ↔ f ≫ g = f' ≫ g' := by |
simp only [← Category.assoc, cancel_mono]
|
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Quotient
#align_import group_theory.complement from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6ca1a09bc9aa75824bf97388c9e3b441fc4ccf3f"
open Set
open scoped Pointwise
namespace Subgroup
variable {G : Type*} [Group G] (H K : Subgroup G) (S T : Set G)
@[to_additive "`S` and `T` are complements if `(+) : S × T → G` is a bijection"]
def IsComplement : Prop :=
Function.Bijective fun x : S × T => x.1.1 * x.2.1
#align subgroup.is_complement Subgroup.IsComplement
#align add_subgroup.is_complement AddSubgroup.IsComplement
@[to_additive "`H` and `K` are complements if `(+) : H × K → G` is a bijection"]
abbrev IsComplement' :=
IsComplement (H : Set G) (K : Set G)
#align subgroup.is_complement' Subgroup.IsComplement'
#align add_subgroup.is_complement' AddSubgroup.IsComplement'
@[to_additive "The set of left-complements of `T : Set G`"]
def leftTransversals : Set (Set G) :=
{ S : Set G | IsComplement S T }
#align subgroup.left_transversals Subgroup.leftTransversals
#align add_subgroup.left_transversals AddSubgroup.leftTransversals
@[to_additive "The set of right-complements of `S : Set G`"]
def rightTransversals : Set (Set G) :=
{ T : Set G | IsComplement S T }
#align subgroup.right_transversals Subgroup.rightTransversals
#align add_subgroup.right_transversals AddSubgroup.rightTransversals
variable {H K S T}
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement'_def : IsComplement' H K ↔ IsComplement (H : Set G) (K : Set G) :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.is_complement'_def Subgroup.isComplement'_def
#align add_subgroup.is_complement'_def AddSubgroup.isComplement'_def
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement_iff_existsUnique :
IsComplement S T ↔ ∀ g : G, ∃! x : S × T, x.1.1 * x.2.1 = g :=
Function.bijective_iff_existsUnique _
#align subgroup.is_complement_iff_exists_unique Subgroup.isComplement_iff_existsUnique
#align add_subgroup.is_complement_iff_exists_unique AddSubgroup.isComplement_iff_existsUnique
@[to_additive]
theorem IsComplement.existsUnique (h : IsComplement S T) (g : G) :
∃! x : S × T, x.1.1 * x.2.1 = g :=
isComplement_iff_existsUnique.mp h g
#align subgroup.is_complement.exists_unique Subgroup.IsComplement.existsUnique
#align add_subgroup.is_complement.exists_unique AddSubgroup.IsComplement.existsUnique
@[to_additive]
theorem IsComplement'.symm (h : IsComplement' H K) : IsComplement' K H := by
let ϕ : H × K ≃ K × H :=
Equiv.mk (fun x => ⟨x.2⁻¹, x.1⁻¹⟩) (fun x => ⟨x.2⁻¹, x.1⁻¹⟩)
(fun x => Prod.ext (inv_inv _) (inv_inv _)) fun x => Prod.ext (inv_inv _) (inv_inv _)
let ψ : G ≃ G := Equiv.mk (fun g : G => g⁻¹) (fun g : G => g⁻¹) inv_inv inv_inv
suffices hf : (ψ ∘ fun x : H × K => x.1.1 * x.2.1) = (fun x : K × H => x.1.1 * x.2.1) ∘ ϕ by
rw [isComplement'_def, IsComplement, ← Equiv.bijective_comp ϕ]
apply (congr_arg Function.Bijective hf).mp -- Porting note: This was a `rw` in mathlib3
rwa [ψ.comp_bijective]
exact funext fun x => mul_inv_rev _ _
#align subgroup.is_complement'.symm Subgroup.IsComplement'.symm
#align add_subgroup.is_complement'.symm AddSubgroup.IsComplement'.symm
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement'_comm : IsComplement' H K ↔ IsComplement' K H :=
⟨IsComplement'.symm, IsComplement'.symm⟩
#align subgroup.is_complement'_comm Subgroup.isComplement'_comm
#align add_subgroup.is_complement'_comm AddSubgroup.isComplement'_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement_univ_singleton {g : G} : IsComplement (univ : Set G) {g} :=
⟨fun ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ h => Prod.ext (Subtype.ext (mul_right_cancel h)) rfl, fun x =>
⟨⟨⟨x * g⁻¹, ⟨⟩⟩, g, rfl⟩, inv_mul_cancel_right x g⟩⟩
#align subgroup.is_complement_top_singleton Subgroup.isComplement_univ_singleton
#align add_subgroup.is_complement_top_singleton AddSubgroup.isComplement_univ_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement_singleton_univ {g : G} : IsComplement ({g} : Set G) univ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨_, rfl⟩, _⟩ ⟨⟨_, rfl⟩, _⟩ h => Prod.ext rfl (Subtype.ext (mul_left_cancel h)), fun x =>
⟨⟨⟨g, rfl⟩, g⁻¹ * x, ⟨⟩⟩, mul_inv_cancel_left g x⟩⟩
#align subgroup.is_complement_singleton_top Subgroup.isComplement_singleton_univ
#align add_subgroup.is_complement_singleton_top AddSubgroup.isComplement_singleton_univ
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement_singleton_left {g : G} : IsComplement {g} S ↔ S = univ := by
refine
⟨fun h => top_le_iff.mp fun x _ => ?_, fun h => (congr_arg _ h).mpr isComplement_singleton_univ⟩
obtain ⟨⟨⟨z, rfl : z = g⟩, y, _⟩, hy⟩ := h.2 (g * x)
rwa [← mul_left_cancel hy]
#align subgroup.is_complement_singleton_left Subgroup.isComplement_singleton_left
#align add_subgroup.is_complement_singleton_left AddSubgroup.isComplement_singleton_left
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement_singleton_right {g : G} : IsComplement S {g} ↔ S = univ := by
refine
⟨fun h => top_le_iff.mp fun x _ => ?_, fun h => h ▸ isComplement_univ_singleton⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := h.2 (x * g)
conv_rhs at hy => rw [← show y.2.1 = g from y.2.2]
rw [← mul_right_cancel hy]
exact y.1.2
#align subgroup.is_complement_singleton_right Subgroup.isComplement_singleton_right
#align add_subgroup.is_complement_singleton_right AddSubgroup.isComplement_singleton_right
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement_univ_left : IsComplement univ S ↔ ∃ g : G, S = {g} := by
refine
⟨fun h => Set.exists_eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_subsingleton.mpr ⟨?_, fun a ha b hb => ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨a, _⟩ := h.2 1
exact ⟨a.2.1, a.2.2⟩
· have : (⟨⟨_, mem_top a⁻¹⟩, ⟨a, ha⟩⟩ : (⊤ : Set G) × S) = ⟨⟨_, mem_top b⁻¹⟩, ⟨b, hb⟩⟩ :=
h.1 ((inv_mul_self a).trans (inv_mul_self b).symm)
exact Subtype.ext_iff.mp (Prod.ext_iff.mp this).2
· rintro ⟨g, rfl⟩
exact isComplement_univ_singleton
#align subgroup.is_complement_top_left Subgroup.isComplement_univ_left
#align add_subgroup.is_complement_top_left AddSubgroup.isComplement_univ_left
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement_univ_right : IsComplement S univ ↔ ∃ g : G, S = {g} := by
refine
⟨fun h => Set.exists_eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_subsingleton.mpr ⟨?_, fun a ha b hb => ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨a, _⟩ := h.2 1
exact ⟨a.1.1, a.1.2⟩
· have : (⟨⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨_, mem_top a⁻¹⟩⟩ : S × (⊤ : Set G)) = ⟨⟨b, hb⟩, ⟨_, mem_top b⁻¹⟩⟩ :=
h.1 ((mul_inv_self a).trans (mul_inv_self b).symm)
exact Subtype.ext_iff.mp (Prod.ext_iff.mp this).1
· rintro ⟨g, rfl⟩
exact isComplement_singleton_univ
#align subgroup.is_complement_top_right Subgroup.isComplement_univ_right
#align add_subgroup.is_complement_top_right AddSubgroup.isComplement_univ_right
@[to_additive]
lemma IsComplement.mul_eq (h : IsComplement S T) : S * T = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun x ↦ by simpa [mem_mul] using (h.existsUnique x).exists
@[to_additive AddSubgroup.IsComplement.card_mul_card]
lemma IsComplement.card_mul_card (h : IsComplement S T) : Nat.card S * Nat.card T = Nat.card G :=
(Nat.card_prod _ _).symm.trans <| Nat.card_congr <| Equiv.ofBijective _ h
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement'_top_bot : IsComplement' (⊤ : Subgroup G) ⊥ :=
isComplement_univ_singleton
#align subgroup.is_complement'_top_bot Subgroup.isComplement'_top_bot
#align add_subgroup.is_complement'_top_bot AddSubgroup.isComplement'_top_bot
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement'_bot_top : IsComplement' (⊥ : Subgroup G) ⊤ :=
isComplement_singleton_univ
#align subgroup.is_complement'_bot_top Subgroup.isComplement'_bot_top
#align add_subgroup.is_complement'_bot_top AddSubgroup.isComplement'_bot_top
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem isComplement'_bot_left : IsComplement' ⊥ H ↔ H = ⊤ :=
isComplement_singleton_left.trans coe_eq_univ
#align subgroup.is_complement'_bot_left Subgroup.isComplement'_bot_left
#align add_subgroup.is_complement'_bot_left AddSubgroup.isComplement'_bot_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem isComplement'_bot_right : IsComplement' H ⊥ ↔ H = ⊤ :=
isComplement_singleton_right.trans coe_eq_univ
#align subgroup.is_complement'_bot_right Subgroup.isComplement'_bot_right
#align add_subgroup.is_complement'_bot_right AddSubgroup.isComplement'_bot_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem isComplement'_top_left : IsComplement' ⊤ H ↔ H = ⊥ :=
isComplement_univ_left.trans coe_eq_singleton
#align subgroup.is_complement'_top_left Subgroup.isComplement'_top_left
#align add_subgroup.is_complement'_top_left AddSubgroup.isComplement'_top_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem isComplement'_top_right : IsComplement' H ⊤ ↔ H = ⊥ :=
isComplement_univ_right.trans coe_eq_singleton
#align subgroup.is_complement'_top_right Subgroup.isComplement'_top_right
#align add_subgroup.is_complement'_top_right AddSubgroup.isComplement'_top_right
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_leftTransversals_iff_existsUnique_inv_mul_mem :
S ∈ leftTransversals T ↔ ∀ g : G, ∃! s : S, (s : G)⁻¹ * g ∈ T := by
rw [leftTransversals, Set.mem_setOf_eq, isComplement_iff_existsUnique]
refine ⟨fun h g => ?_, fun h g => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨x, h1, h2⟩ := h g
exact
⟨x.1, (congr_arg (· ∈ T) (eq_inv_mul_of_mul_eq h1)).mp x.2.2, fun y hy =>
(Prod.ext_iff.mp (h2 ⟨y, (↑y)⁻¹ * g, hy⟩ (mul_inv_cancel_left ↑y g))).1⟩
· obtain ⟨x, h1, h2⟩ := h g
refine ⟨⟨x, (↑x)⁻¹ * g, h1⟩, mul_inv_cancel_left (↑x) g, fun y hy => ?_⟩
have hf := h2 y.1 ((congr_arg (· ∈ T) (eq_inv_mul_of_mul_eq hy)).mp y.2.2)
exact Prod.ext hf (Subtype.ext (eq_inv_mul_of_mul_eq (hf ▸ hy)))
#align subgroup.mem_left_transversals_iff_exists_unique_inv_mul_mem Subgroup.mem_leftTransversals_iff_existsUnique_inv_mul_mem
#align add_subgroup.mem_left_transversals_iff_exists_unique_neg_add_mem AddSubgroup.mem_leftTransversals_iff_existsUnique_neg_add_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_rightTransversals_iff_existsUnique_mul_inv_mem :
S ∈ rightTransversals T ↔ ∀ g : G, ∃! s : S, g * (s : G)⁻¹ ∈ T := by
rw [rightTransversals, Set.mem_setOf_eq, isComplement_iff_existsUnique]
refine ⟨fun h g => ?_, fun h g => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨x, h1, h2⟩ := h g
exact
⟨x.2, (congr_arg (· ∈ T) (eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq h1)).mp x.1.2, fun y hy =>
(Prod.ext_iff.mp (h2 ⟨⟨g * (↑y)⁻¹, hy⟩, y⟩ (inv_mul_cancel_right g y))).2⟩
· obtain ⟨x, h1, h2⟩ := h g
refine ⟨⟨⟨g * (↑x)⁻¹, h1⟩, x⟩, inv_mul_cancel_right g x, fun y hy => ?_⟩
have hf := h2 y.2 ((congr_arg (· ∈ T) (eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq hy)).mp y.1.2)
exact Prod.ext (Subtype.ext (eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq (hf ▸ hy))) hf
#align subgroup.mem_right_transversals_iff_exists_unique_mul_inv_mem Subgroup.mem_rightTransversals_iff_existsUnique_mul_inv_mem
#align add_subgroup.mem_right_transversals_iff_exists_unique_add_neg_mem AddSubgroup.mem_rightTransversals_iff_existsUnique_add_neg_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_leftTransversals_iff_existsUnique_quotient_mk''_eq :
S ∈ leftTransversals (H : Set G) ↔
∀ q : Quotient (QuotientGroup.leftRel H), ∃! s : S, Quotient.mk'' s.1 = q := by
simp_rw [mem_leftTransversals_iff_existsUnique_inv_mul_mem, SetLike.mem_coe, ←
QuotientGroup.eq']
exact ⟨fun h q => Quotient.inductionOn' q h, fun h g => h (Quotient.mk'' g)⟩
#align subgroup.mem_left_transversals_iff_exists_unique_quotient_mk'_eq Subgroup.mem_leftTransversals_iff_existsUnique_quotient_mk''_eq
#align add_subgroup.mem_left_transversals_iff_exists_unique_quotient_mk'_eq AddSubgroup.mem_leftTransversals_iff_existsUnique_quotient_mk''_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_rightTransversals_iff_existsUnique_quotient_mk''_eq :
S ∈ rightTransversals (H : Set G) ↔
∀ q : Quotient (QuotientGroup.rightRel H), ∃! s : S, Quotient.mk'' s.1 = q := by
simp_rw [mem_rightTransversals_iff_existsUnique_mul_inv_mem, SetLike.mem_coe, ←
QuotientGroup.rightRel_apply, ← Quotient.eq'']
exact ⟨fun h q => Quotient.inductionOn' q h, fun h g => h (Quotient.mk'' g)⟩
#align subgroup.mem_right_transversals_iff_exists_unique_quotient_mk'_eq Subgroup.mem_rightTransversals_iff_existsUnique_quotient_mk''_eq
#align add_subgroup.mem_right_transversals_iff_exists_unique_quotient_mk'_eq AddSubgroup.mem_rightTransversals_iff_existsUnique_quotient_mk''_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_leftTransversals_iff_bijective :
S ∈ leftTransversals (H : Set G) ↔
Function.Bijective (S.restrict (Quotient.mk'' : G → Quotient (QuotientGroup.leftRel H))) :=
mem_leftTransversals_iff_existsUnique_quotient_mk''_eq.trans
(Function.bijective_iff_existsUnique (S.restrict Quotient.mk'')).symm
#align subgroup.mem_left_transversals_iff_bijective Subgroup.mem_leftTransversals_iff_bijective
#align add_subgroup.mem_left_transversals_iff_bijective AddSubgroup.mem_leftTransversals_iff_bijective
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_rightTransversals_iff_bijective :
S ∈ rightTransversals (H : Set G) ↔
Function.Bijective (S.restrict (Quotient.mk'' : G → Quotient (QuotientGroup.rightRel H))) :=
mem_rightTransversals_iff_existsUnique_quotient_mk''_eq.trans
(Function.bijective_iff_existsUnique (S.restrict Quotient.mk'')).symm
#align subgroup.mem_right_transversals_iff_bijective Subgroup.mem_rightTransversals_iff_bijective
#align add_subgroup.mem_right_transversals_iff_bijective AddSubgroup.mem_rightTransversals_iff_bijective
@[to_additive]
theorem card_left_transversal (h : S ∈ leftTransversals (H : Set G)) : Nat.card S = H.index :=
Nat.card_congr <| Equiv.ofBijective _ <| mem_leftTransversals_iff_bijective.mp h
#align subgroup.card_left_transversal Subgroup.card_left_transversal
#align add_subgroup.card_left_transversal AddSubgroup.card_left_transversal
@[to_additive]
theorem card_right_transversal (h : S ∈ rightTransversals (H : Set G)) : Nat.card S = H.index :=
Nat.card_congr <|
(Equiv.ofBijective _ <| mem_rightTransversals_iff_bijective.mp h).trans <|
QuotientGroup.quotientRightRelEquivQuotientLeftRel H
#align subgroup.card_right_transversal Subgroup.card_right_transversal
#align add_subgroup.card_right_transversal AddSubgroup.card_right_transversal
@[to_additive]
theorem range_mem_leftTransversals {f : G ⧸ H → G} (hf : ∀ q, ↑(f q) = q) :
Set.range f ∈ leftTransversals (H : Set G) :=
mem_leftTransversals_iff_bijective.mpr
⟨by rintro ⟨-, q₁, rfl⟩ ⟨-, q₂, rfl⟩ h
exact Subtype.ext <| congr_arg f <| ((hf q₁).symm.trans h).trans (hf q₂),
fun q => ⟨⟨f q, q, rfl⟩, hf q⟩⟩
#align subgroup.range_mem_left_transversals Subgroup.range_mem_leftTransversals
#align add_subgroup.range_mem_left_transversals AddSubgroup.range_mem_leftTransversals
@[to_additive]
theorem range_mem_rightTransversals {f : Quotient (QuotientGroup.rightRel H) → G}
(hf : ∀ q, Quotient.mk'' (f q) = q) : Set.range f ∈ rightTransversals (H : Set G) :=
mem_rightTransversals_iff_bijective.mpr
⟨by rintro ⟨-, q₁, rfl⟩ ⟨-, q₂, rfl⟩ h
exact Subtype.ext <| congr_arg f <| ((hf q₁).symm.trans h).trans (hf q₂),
fun q => ⟨⟨f q, q, rfl⟩, hf q⟩⟩
#align subgroup.range_mem_right_transversals Subgroup.range_mem_rightTransversals
#align add_subgroup.range_mem_right_transversals AddSubgroup.range_mem_rightTransversals
@[to_additive]
lemma exists_left_transversal (H : Subgroup G) (g : G) :
∃ S ∈ leftTransversals (H : Set G), g ∈ S := by
classical
refine
⟨Set.range (Function.update Quotient.out' _ g), range_mem_leftTransversals fun q => ?_,
Quotient.mk'' g, Function.update_same (Quotient.mk'' g) g Quotient.out'⟩
by_cases hq : q = Quotient.mk'' g
· exact hq.symm ▸ congr_arg _ (Function.update_same (Quotient.mk'' g) g Quotient.out')
· refine (Function.update_noteq ?_ g Quotient.out') ▸ q.out_eq'
exact hq
#align subgroup.exists_left_transversal Subgroup.exists_left_transversal
#align add_subgroup.exists_left_transversal AddSubgroup.exists_left_transversal
@[to_additive]
lemma exists_right_transversal (H : Subgroup G) (g : G) :
∃ S ∈ rightTransversals (H : Set G), g ∈ S := by
classical
refine
⟨Set.range (Function.update Quotient.out' _ g), range_mem_rightTransversals fun q => ?_,
Quotient.mk'' g, Function.update_same (Quotient.mk'' g) g Quotient.out'⟩
by_cases hq : q = Quotient.mk'' g
· exact hq.symm ▸ congr_arg _ (Function.update_same (Quotient.mk'' g) g Quotient.out')
· exact Eq.trans (congr_arg _ (Function.update_noteq hq g Quotient.out')) q.out_eq'
#align subgroup.exists_right_transversal Subgroup.exists_right_transversal
#align add_subgroup.exists_right_transversal AddSubgroup.exists_right_transversal
@[to_additive "Given two subgroups `H' ⊆ H`, there exists a transversal to `H'` inside `H`"]
lemma exists_left_transversal_of_le {H' H : Subgroup G} (h : H' ≤ H) :
∃ S : Set G, S * H' = H ∧ Nat.card S * Nat.card H' = Nat.card H := by
let H'' : Subgroup H := H'.comap H.subtype
have : H' = H''.map H.subtype := by simp [H'', h]
rw [this]
obtain ⟨S, cmem, -⟩ := H''.exists_left_transversal 1
refine ⟨H.subtype '' S, ?_, ?_⟩
· have : H.subtype '' (S * H'') = H.subtype '' S * H''.map H.subtype := image_mul H.subtype
rw [← this, cmem.mul_eq]
simp [Set.ext_iff]
· rw [← cmem.card_mul_card]
refine congr_arg₂ (· * ·) ?_ ?_ <;>
exact Nat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.image _ _ <| subtype_injective H).symm
@[to_additive "Given two subgroups `H' ⊆ H`, there exists a transversal to `H'` inside `H`"]
lemma exists_right_transversal_of_le {H' H : Subgroup G} (h : H' ≤ H) :
∃ S : Set G, H' * S = H ∧ Nat.card H' * Nat.card S = Nat.card H := by
let H'' : Subgroup H := H'.comap H.subtype
have : H' = H''.map H.subtype := by simp [H'', h]
rw [this]
obtain ⟨S, cmem, -⟩ := H''.exists_right_transversal 1
refine ⟨H.subtype '' S, ?_, ?_⟩
· have : H.subtype '' (H'' * S) = H''.map H.subtype * H.subtype '' S := image_mul H.subtype
rw [← this, cmem.mul_eq]
simp [Set.ext_iff]
· have : Nat.card H'' * Nat.card S = Nat.card H := cmem.card_mul_card
rw [← this]
refine congr_arg₂ (· * ·) ?_ ?_ <;>
exact Nat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.image _ _ <| subtype_injective H).symm
namespace IsComplement
noncomputable def equiv {S T : Set G} (hST : IsComplement S T) : G ≃ S × T :=
(Equiv.ofBijective (fun x : S × T => x.1.1 * x.2.1) hST).symm
variable (hST : IsComplement S T) (hHT : IsComplement H T) (hSK : IsComplement S K)
@[simp] theorem equiv_symm_apply (x : S × T) : (hST.equiv.symm x : G) = x.1.1 * x.2.1 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem equiv_fst_mul_equiv_snd (g : G) : ↑(hST.equiv g).fst * (hST.equiv g).snd = g :=
(Equiv.ofBijective (fun x : S × T => x.1.1 * x.2.1) hST).right_inv g
theorem equiv_fst_eq_mul_inv (g : G) : ↑(hST.equiv g).fst = g * ((hST.equiv g).snd : G)⁻¹ :=
eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq (hST.equiv_fst_mul_equiv_snd g)
theorem equiv_snd_eq_inv_mul (g : G) : ↑(hST.equiv g).snd = ((hST.equiv g).fst : G)⁻¹ * g :=
eq_inv_mul_of_mul_eq (hST.equiv_fst_mul_equiv_snd g)
theorem equiv_fst_eq_iff_leftCosetEquivalence {g₁ g₂ : G} :
(hSK.equiv g₁).fst = (hSK.equiv g₂).fst ↔ LeftCosetEquivalence K g₁ g₂ := by
rw [LeftCosetEquivalence, leftCoset_eq_iff]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← hSK.equiv_fst_mul_equiv_snd g₂, ← hSK.equiv_fst_mul_equiv_snd g₁, ← h,
mul_inv_rev, ← mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel_right, ← coe_inv, ← coe_mul]
exact Subtype.property _
· intro h
apply (mem_leftTransversals_iff_existsUnique_inv_mul_mem.1 hSK g₁).unique
· -- This used to be `simp [...]` before leanprover/lean4#2644
rw [equiv_fst_eq_mul_inv]; simp
· rw [SetLike.mem_coe, ← mul_mem_cancel_right h]
-- This used to be `simp [...]` before leanprover/lean4#2644
rw [equiv_fst_eq_mul_inv]; simp [equiv_fst_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_assoc]
theorem equiv_snd_eq_iff_rightCosetEquivalence {g₁ g₂ : G} :
(hHT.equiv g₁).snd = (hHT.equiv g₂).snd ↔ RightCosetEquivalence H g₁ g₂ := by
rw [RightCosetEquivalence, rightCoset_eq_iff]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← hHT.equiv_fst_mul_equiv_snd g₂, ← hHT.equiv_fst_mul_equiv_snd g₁, ← h,
mul_inv_rev, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel_left, ← coe_inv, ← coe_mul]
exact Subtype.property _
· intro h
apply (mem_rightTransversals_iff_existsUnique_mul_inv_mem.1 hHT g₁).unique
· -- This used to be `simp [...]` before leanprover/lean4#2644
rw [equiv_snd_eq_inv_mul]; simp
· rw [SetLike.mem_coe, ← mul_mem_cancel_left h]
-- This used to be `simp [...]` before leanprover/lean4#2644
rw [equiv_snd_eq_inv_mul, mul_assoc]; simp
theorem leftCosetEquivalence_equiv_fst (g : G) :
LeftCosetEquivalence K g ((hSK.equiv g).fst : G) := by
-- This used to be `simp [...]` before leanprover/lean4#2644
rw [equiv_fst_eq_mul_inv]; simp [LeftCosetEquivalence, leftCoset_eq_iff]
theorem rightCosetEquivalence_equiv_snd (g : G) :
RightCosetEquivalence H g ((hHT.equiv g).snd : G) := by
-- This used to be `simp [...]` before leanprover/lean4#2644
rw [RightCosetEquivalence, rightCoset_eq_iff, equiv_snd_eq_inv_mul]; simp
theorem equiv_fst_eq_self_of_mem_of_one_mem {g : G} (h1 : 1 ∈ T) (hg : g ∈ S) :
(hST.equiv g).fst = ⟨g, hg⟩ := by
have : hST.equiv.symm (⟨g, hg⟩, ⟨1, h1⟩) = g := by
rw [equiv, Equiv.ofBijective]; simp
conv_lhs => rw [← this, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
theorem equiv_snd_eq_self_of_mem_of_one_mem {g : G} (h1 : 1 ∈ S) (hg : g ∈ T) :
(hST.equiv g).snd = ⟨g, hg⟩ := by
have : hST.equiv.symm (⟨1, h1⟩, ⟨g, hg⟩) = g := by
rw [equiv, Equiv.ofBijective]; simp
conv_lhs => rw [← this, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
theorem equiv_snd_eq_one_of_mem_of_one_mem {g : G} (h1 : 1 ∈ T) (hg : g ∈ S) :
(hST.equiv g).snd = ⟨1, h1⟩ := by
ext
rw [equiv_snd_eq_inv_mul, equiv_fst_eq_self_of_mem_of_one_mem _ h1 hg, inv_mul_self]
theorem equiv_fst_eq_one_of_mem_of_one_mem {g : G} (h1 : 1 ∈ S) (hg : g ∈ T) :
(hST.equiv g).fst = ⟨1, h1⟩ := by
ext
rw [equiv_fst_eq_mul_inv, equiv_snd_eq_self_of_mem_of_one_mem _ h1 hg, mul_inv_self]
-- This lemma has always been bad, but the linter only noticed after lean4#2644.
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem equiv_mul_right (g : G) (k : K) :
hSK.equiv (g * k) = ((hSK.equiv g).fst, (hSK.equiv g).snd * k) := by
have : (hSK.equiv (g * k)).fst = (hSK.equiv g).fst :=
hSK.equiv_fst_eq_iff_leftCosetEquivalence.2
(by simp [LeftCosetEquivalence, leftCoset_eq_iff])
ext
· rw [this]
· rw [coe_mul, equiv_snd_eq_inv_mul, this, equiv_snd_eq_inv_mul, mul_assoc]
theorem equiv_mul_right_of_mem {g k : G} (h : k ∈ K) :
hSK.equiv (g * k) = ((hSK.equiv g).fst, (hSK.equiv g).snd * ⟨k, h⟩) :=
equiv_mul_right _ g ⟨k, h⟩
-- This lemma has always been bad, but the linter only noticed after lean4#2644.
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem equiv_mul_left (h : H) (g : G) :
hHT.equiv (h * g) = (h * (hHT.equiv g).fst, (hHT.equiv g).snd) := by
have : (hHT.equiv (h * g)).2 = (hHT.equiv g).2 := hHT.equiv_snd_eq_iff_rightCosetEquivalence.2 ?_
· ext
· rw [coe_mul, equiv_fst_eq_mul_inv, this, equiv_fst_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc]
· rw [this]
· simp [RightCosetEquivalence, ← smul_smul]
theorem equiv_mul_left_of_mem {h g : G} (hh : h ∈ H) :
hHT.equiv (h * g) = (⟨h, hh⟩ * (hHT.equiv g).fst, (hHT.equiv g).snd) :=
equiv_mul_left _ ⟨h, hh⟩ g
theorem equiv_one (hs1 : 1 ∈ S) (ht1 : 1 ∈ T) :
hST.equiv 1 = (⟨1, hs1⟩, ⟨1, ht1⟩) := by
rw [Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply]; simp [equiv]
theorem equiv_fst_eq_self_iff_mem {g : G} (h1 : 1 ∈ T) :
((hST.equiv g).fst : G) = g ↔ g ∈ S := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [← h]
exact Subtype.prop _
· intro h
rw [hST.equiv_fst_eq_self_of_mem_of_one_mem h1 h]
theorem equiv_snd_eq_self_iff_mem {g : G} (h1 : 1 ∈ S) :
((hST.equiv g).snd : G) = g ↔ g ∈ T := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [← h]
exact Subtype.prop _
· intro h
rw [hST.equiv_snd_eq_self_of_mem_of_one_mem h1 h]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Complement.lean | 514 | 516 | theorem coe_equiv_fst_eq_one_iff_mem {g : G} (h1 : 1 ∈ S) :
((hST.equiv g).fst : G) = 1 ↔ g ∈ T := by |
rw [equiv_fst_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv_eq_one, eq_comm, equiv_snd_eq_self_iff_mem _ h1]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Linear
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.HomologicalComplex
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
#align_import algebra.homology.homotopy from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"618ea3d5c99240cd7000d8376924906a148bf9ff"
universe v u
open scoped Classical
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory Category Limits HomologicalComplex
variable {ι : Type*}
variable {V : Type u} [Category.{v} V] [Preadditive V]
variable {c : ComplexShape ι} {C D E : HomologicalComplex V c}
variable (f g : C ⟶ D) (h k : D ⟶ E) (i : ι)
section
def dNext (i : ι) : (∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) →+ (C.X i ⟶ D.X i) :=
AddMonoidHom.mk' (fun f => C.d i (c.next i) ≫ f (c.next i) i) fun _ _ =>
Preadditive.comp_add _ _ _ _ _ _
#align d_next dNext
def fromNext (i : ι) : (∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) →+ (C.xNext i ⟶ D.X i) :=
AddMonoidHom.mk' (fun f => f (c.next i) i) fun _ _ => rfl
#align from_next fromNext
@[simp]
theorem dNext_eq_dFrom_fromNext (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) (i : ι) :
dNext i f = C.dFrom i ≫ fromNext i f :=
rfl
#align d_next_eq_d_from_from_next dNext_eq_dFrom_fromNext
theorem dNext_eq (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) {i i' : ι} (w : c.Rel i i') :
dNext i f = C.d i i' ≫ f i' i := by
obtain rfl := c.next_eq' w
rfl
#align d_next_eq dNext_eq
lemma dNext_eq_zero (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) (i : ι) (hi : ¬ c.Rel i (c.next i)) :
dNext i f = 0 := by
dsimp [dNext]
rw [shape _ _ _ hi, zero_comp]
@[simp 1100]
theorem dNext_comp_left (f : C ⟶ D) (g : ∀ i j, D.X i ⟶ E.X j) (i : ι) :
(dNext i fun i j => f.f i ≫ g i j) = f.f i ≫ dNext i g :=
(f.comm_assoc _ _ _).symm
#align d_next_comp_left dNext_comp_left
@[simp 1100]
theorem dNext_comp_right (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) (g : D ⟶ E) (i : ι) :
(dNext i fun i j => f i j ≫ g.f j) = dNext i f ≫ g.f i :=
(assoc _ _ _).symm
#align d_next_comp_right dNext_comp_right
def prevD (j : ι) : (∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) →+ (C.X j ⟶ D.X j) :=
AddMonoidHom.mk' (fun f => f j (c.prev j) ≫ D.d (c.prev j) j) fun _ _ =>
Preadditive.add_comp _ _ _ _ _ _
#align prev_d prevD
lemma prevD_eq_zero (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) (i : ι) (hi : ¬ c.Rel (c.prev i) i) :
prevD i f = 0 := by
dsimp [prevD]
rw [shape _ _ _ hi, comp_zero]
def toPrev (j : ι) : (∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) →+ (C.X j ⟶ D.xPrev j) :=
AddMonoidHom.mk' (fun f => f j (c.prev j)) fun _ _ => rfl
#align to_prev toPrev
@[simp]
theorem prevD_eq_toPrev_dTo (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) (j : ι) :
prevD j f = toPrev j f ≫ D.dTo j :=
rfl
#align prev_d_eq_to_prev_d_to prevD_eq_toPrev_dTo
theorem prevD_eq (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) {j j' : ι} (w : c.Rel j' j) :
prevD j f = f j j' ≫ D.d j' j := by
obtain rfl := c.prev_eq' w
rfl
#align prev_d_eq prevD_eq
@[simp 1100]
theorem prevD_comp_left (f : C ⟶ D) (g : ∀ i j, D.X i ⟶ E.X j) (j : ι) :
(prevD j fun i j => f.f i ≫ g i j) = f.f j ≫ prevD j g :=
assoc _ _ _
#align prev_d_comp_left prevD_comp_left
@[simp 1100]
theorem prevD_comp_right (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) (g : D ⟶ E) (j : ι) :
(prevD j fun i j => f i j ≫ g.f j) = prevD j f ≫ g.f j := by
dsimp [prevD]
simp only [assoc, g.comm]
#align prev_d_comp_right prevD_comp_right
theorem dNext_nat (C D : ChainComplex V ℕ) (i : ℕ) (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) :
dNext i f = C.d i (i - 1) ≫ f (i - 1) i := by
dsimp [dNext]
cases i
· simp only [shape, ChainComplex.next_nat_zero, ComplexShape.down_Rel, Nat.one_ne_zero,
not_false_iff, zero_comp]
· congr <;> simp
#align d_next_nat dNext_nat
theorem prevD_nat (C D : CochainComplex V ℕ) (i : ℕ) (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) :
prevD i f = f i (i - 1) ≫ D.d (i - 1) i := by
dsimp [prevD]
cases i
· simp only [shape, CochainComplex.prev_nat_zero, ComplexShape.up_Rel, Nat.one_ne_zero,
not_false_iff, comp_zero]
· congr <;> simp
#align prev_d_nat prevD_nat
-- Porting note(#5171): removed @[has_nonempty_instance]
@[ext]
structure Homotopy (f g : C ⟶ D) where
hom : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j
zero : ∀ i j, ¬c.Rel j i → hom i j = 0 := by aesop_cat
comm : ∀ i, f.f i = dNext i hom + prevD i hom + g.f i := by aesop_cat
#align homotopy Homotopy
variable {f g}
namespace Homotopy
def equivSubZero : Homotopy f g ≃ Homotopy (f - g) 0 where
toFun h :=
{ hom := fun i j => h.hom i j
zero := fun i j w => h.zero _ _ w
comm := fun i => by simp [h.comm] }
invFun h :=
{ hom := fun i j => h.hom i j
zero := fun i j w => h.zero _ _ w
comm := fun i => by simpa [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] using h.comm i }
left_inv := by aesop_cat
right_inv := by aesop_cat
#align homotopy.equiv_sub_zero Homotopy.equivSubZero
@[simps]
def ofEq (h : f = g) : Homotopy f g where
hom := 0
zero _ _ _ := rfl
#align homotopy.of_eq Homotopy.ofEq
@[simps!, refl]
def refl (f : C ⟶ D) : Homotopy f f :=
ofEq (rfl : f = f)
#align homotopy.refl Homotopy.refl
@[simps!, symm]
def symm {f g : C ⟶ D} (h : Homotopy f g) : Homotopy g f where
hom := -h.hom
zero i j w := by rw [Pi.neg_apply, Pi.neg_apply, h.zero i j w, neg_zero]
comm i := by
rw [AddMonoidHom.map_neg, AddMonoidHom.map_neg, h.comm, ← neg_add, ← add_assoc, neg_add_self,
zero_add]
#align homotopy.symm Homotopy.symm
@[simps!, trans]
def trans {e f g : C ⟶ D} (h : Homotopy e f) (k : Homotopy f g) : Homotopy e g where
hom := h.hom + k.hom
zero i j w := by rw [Pi.add_apply, Pi.add_apply, h.zero i j w, k.zero i j w, zero_add]
comm i := by
rw [AddMonoidHom.map_add, AddMonoidHom.map_add, h.comm, k.comm]
abel
#align homotopy.trans Homotopy.trans
@[simps!]
def add {f₁ g₁ f₂ g₂ : C ⟶ D} (h₁ : Homotopy f₁ g₁) (h₂ : Homotopy f₂ g₂) :
Homotopy (f₁ + f₂) (g₁ + g₂) where
hom := h₁.hom + h₂.hom
zero i j hij := by rw [Pi.add_apply, Pi.add_apply, h₁.zero i j hij, h₂.zero i j hij, add_zero]
comm i := by
simp only [HomologicalComplex.add_f_apply, h₁.comm, h₂.comm, AddMonoidHom.map_add]
abel
#align homotopy.add Homotopy.add
@[simps!]
def smul {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [Linear R V] (h : Homotopy f g) (a : R) :
Homotopy (a • f) (a • g) where
hom i j := a • h.hom i j
zero i j hij := by
dsimp
rw [h.zero i j hij, smul_zero]
comm i := by
dsimp
rw [h.comm]
dsimp [fromNext, toPrev]
simp only [smul_add, Linear.comp_smul, Linear.smul_comp]
@[simps]
def compRight {e f : C ⟶ D} (h : Homotopy e f) (g : D ⟶ E) : Homotopy (e ≫ g) (f ≫ g) where
hom i j := h.hom i j ≫ g.f j
zero i j w := by dsimp; rw [h.zero i j w, zero_comp]
comm i := by rw [comp_f, h.comm i, dNext_comp_right, prevD_comp_right, Preadditive.add_comp,
comp_f, Preadditive.add_comp]
#align homotopy.comp_right Homotopy.compRight
@[simps]
def compLeft {f g : D ⟶ E} (h : Homotopy f g) (e : C ⟶ D) : Homotopy (e ≫ f) (e ≫ g) where
hom i j := e.f i ≫ h.hom i j
zero i j w := by dsimp; rw [h.zero i j w, comp_zero]
comm i := by rw [comp_f, h.comm i, dNext_comp_left, prevD_comp_left, comp_f,
Preadditive.comp_add, Preadditive.comp_add]
#align homotopy.comp_left Homotopy.compLeft
@[simps!]
def comp {C₁ C₂ C₃ : HomologicalComplex V c} {f₁ g₁ : C₁ ⟶ C₂} {f₂ g₂ : C₂ ⟶ C₃}
(h₁ : Homotopy f₁ g₁) (h₂ : Homotopy f₂ g₂) : Homotopy (f₁ ≫ f₂) (g₁ ≫ g₂) :=
(h₁.compRight _).trans (h₂.compLeft _)
#align homotopy.comp Homotopy.comp
@[simps!]
def compRightId {f : C ⟶ C} (h : Homotopy f (𝟙 C)) (g : C ⟶ D) : Homotopy (f ≫ g) g :=
(h.compRight g).trans (ofEq <| id_comp _)
#align homotopy.comp_right_id Homotopy.compRightId
@[simps!]
def compLeftId {f : D ⟶ D} (h : Homotopy f (𝟙 D)) (g : C ⟶ D) : Homotopy (g ≫ f) g :=
(h.compLeft g).trans (ofEq <| comp_id _)
#align homotopy.comp_left_id Homotopy.compLeftId
def nullHomotopicMap (hom : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) : C ⟶ D where
f i := dNext i hom + prevD i hom
comm' i j hij := by
have eq1 : prevD i hom ≫ D.d i j = 0 := by
simp only [prevD, AddMonoidHom.mk'_apply, assoc, d_comp_d, comp_zero]
have eq2 : C.d i j ≫ dNext j hom = 0 := by
simp only [dNext, AddMonoidHom.mk'_apply, d_comp_d_assoc, zero_comp]
dsimp only
rw [dNext_eq hom hij, prevD_eq hom hij, Preadditive.comp_add, Preadditive.add_comp, eq1, eq2,
add_zero, zero_add, assoc]
#align homotopy.null_homotopic_map Homotopy.nullHomotopicMap
def nullHomotopicMap' (h : ∀ i j, c.Rel j i → (C.X i ⟶ D.X j)) : C ⟶ D :=
nullHomotopicMap fun i j => dite (c.Rel j i) (h i j) fun _ => 0
#align homotopy.null_homotopic_map' Homotopy.nullHomotopicMap'
theorem nullHomotopicMap_comp (hom : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) (g : D ⟶ E) :
nullHomotopicMap hom ≫ g = nullHomotopicMap fun i j => hom i j ≫ g.f j := by
ext n
dsimp [nullHomotopicMap, fromNext, toPrev, AddMonoidHom.mk'_apply]
simp only [Preadditive.add_comp, assoc, g.comm]
#align homotopy.null_homotopic_map_comp Homotopy.nullHomotopicMap_comp
theorem nullHomotopicMap'_comp (hom : ∀ i j, c.Rel j i → (C.X i ⟶ D.X j)) (g : D ⟶ E) :
nullHomotopicMap' hom ≫ g = nullHomotopicMap' fun i j hij => hom i j hij ≫ g.f j := by
ext n
erw [nullHomotopicMap_comp]
congr
ext i j
split_ifs
· rfl
· rw [zero_comp]
#align homotopy.null_homotopic_map'_comp Homotopy.nullHomotopicMap'_comp
theorem comp_nullHomotopicMap (f : C ⟶ D) (hom : ∀ i j, D.X i ⟶ E.X j) :
f ≫ nullHomotopicMap hom = nullHomotopicMap fun i j => f.f i ≫ hom i j := by
ext n
dsimp [nullHomotopicMap, fromNext, toPrev, AddMonoidHom.mk'_apply]
simp only [Preadditive.comp_add, assoc, f.comm_assoc]
#align homotopy.comp_null_homotopic_map Homotopy.comp_nullHomotopicMap
theorem comp_nullHomotopicMap' (f : C ⟶ D) (hom : ∀ i j, c.Rel j i → (D.X i ⟶ E.X j)) :
f ≫ nullHomotopicMap' hom = nullHomotopicMap' fun i j hij => f.f i ≫ hom i j hij := by
ext n
erw [comp_nullHomotopicMap]
congr
ext i j
split_ifs
· rfl
· rw [comp_zero]
#align homotopy.comp_null_homotopic_map' Homotopy.comp_nullHomotopicMap'
theorem map_nullHomotopicMap {W : Type*} [Category W] [Preadditive W] (G : V ⥤ W) [G.Additive]
(hom : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) :
(G.mapHomologicalComplex c).map (nullHomotopicMap hom) =
nullHomotopicMap (fun i j => by exact G.map (hom i j)) := by
ext i
dsimp [nullHomotopicMap, dNext, prevD]
simp only [G.map_comp, Functor.map_add]
#align homotopy.map_null_homotopic_map Homotopy.map_nullHomotopicMap
theorem map_nullHomotopicMap' {W : Type*} [Category W] [Preadditive W] (G : V ⥤ W) [G.Additive]
(hom : ∀ i j, c.Rel j i → (C.X i ⟶ D.X j)) :
(G.mapHomologicalComplex c).map (nullHomotopicMap' hom) =
nullHomotopicMap' fun i j hij => by exact G.map (hom i j hij) := by
ext n
erw [map_nullHomotopicMap]
congr
ext i j
split_ifs
· rfl
· rw [G.map_zero]
#align homotopy.map_null_homotopic_map' Homotopy.map_nullHomotopicMap'
@[simps]
def nullHomotopy (hom : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) (zero : ∀ i j, ¬c.Rel j i → hom i j = 0) :
Homotopy (nullHomotopicMap hom) 0 :=
{ hom := hom
zero := zero
comm := by
intro i
rw [HomologicalComplex.zero_f_apply, add_zero]
rfl }
#align homotopy.null_homotopy Homotopy.nullHomotopy
@[simps!]
def nullHomotopy' (h : ∀ i j, c.Rel j i → (C.X i ⟶ D.X j)) : Homotopy (nullHomotopicMap' h) 0 := by
apply nullHomotopy fun i j => dite (c.Rel j i) (h i j) fun _ => 0
intro i j hij
rw [dite_eq_right_iff]
intro hij'
exfalso
exact hij hij'
#align homotopy.null_homotopy' Homotopy.nullHomotopy'
@[simp]
theorem nullHomotopicMap_f {k₂ k₁ k₀ : ι} (r₂₁ : c.Rel k₂ k₁) (r₁₀ : c.Rel k₁ k₀)
(hom : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) :
(nullHomotopicMap hom).f k₁ = C.d k₁ k₀ ≫ hom k₀ k₁ + hom k₁ k₂ ≫ D.d k₂ k₁ := by
dsimp only [nullHomotopicMap]
rw [dNext_eq hom r₁₀, prevD_eq hom r₂₁]
#align homotopy.null_homotopic_map_f Homotopy.nullHomotopicMap_f
@[simp]
theorem nullHomotopicMap'_f {k₂ k₁ k₀ : ι} (r₂₁ : c.Rel k₂ k₁) (r₁₀ : c.Rel k₁ k₀)
(h : ∀ i j, c.Rel j i → (C.X i ⟶ D.X j)) :
(nullHomotopicMap' h).f k₁ = C.d k₁ k₀ ≫ h k₀ k₁ r₁₀ + h k₁ k₂ r₂₁ ≫ D.d k₂ k₁ := by
simp only [nullHomotopicMap']
rw [nullHomotopicMap_f r₂₁ r₁₀]
split_ifs
rfl
#align homotopy.null_homotopic_map'_f Homotopy.nullHomotopicMap'_f
@[simp]
theorem nullHomotopicMap_f_of_not_rel_left {k₁ k₀ : ι} (r₁₀ : c.Rel k₁ k₀)
(hk₀ : ∀ l : ι, ¬c.Rel k₀ l) (hom : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) :
(nullHomotopicMap hom).f k₀ = hom k₀ k₁ ≫ D.d k₁ k₀ := by
dsimp only [nullHomotopicMap]
rw [prevD_eq hom r₁₀, dNext, AddMonoidHom.mk'_apply, C.shape, zero_comp, zero_add]
exact hk₀ _
#align homotopy.null_homotopic_map_f_of_not_rel_left Homotopy.nullHomotopicMap_f_of_not_rel_left
@[simp]
theorem nullHomotopicMap'_f_of_not_rel_left {k₁ k₀ : ι} (r₁₀ : c.Rel k₁ k₀)
(hk₀ : ∀ l : ι, ¬c.Rel k₀ l) (h : ∀ i j, c.Rel j i → (C.X i ⟶ D.X j)) :
(nullHomotopicMap' h).f k₀ = h k₀ k₁ r₁₀ ≫ D.d k₁ k₀ := by
simp only [nullHomotopicMap']
rw [nullHomotopicMap_f_of_not_rel_left r₁₀ hk₀]
split_ifs
rfl
#align homotopy.null_homotopic_map'_f_of_not_rel_left Homotopy.nullHomotopicMap'_f_of_not_rel_left
@[simp]
theorem nullHomotopicMap_f_of_not_rel_right {k₁ k₀ : ι} (r₁₀ : c.Rel k₁ k₀)
(hk₁ : ∀ l : ι, ¬c.Rel l k₁) (hom : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) :
(nullHomotopicMap hom).f k₁ = C.d k₁ k₀ ≫ hom k₀ k₁ := by
dsimp only [nullHomotopicMap]
rw [dNext_eq hom r₁₀, prevD, AddMonoidHom.mk'_apply, D.shape, comp_zero, add_zero]
exact hk₁ _
#align homotopy.null_homotopic_map_f_of_not_rel_right Homotopy.nullHomotopicMap_f_of_not_rel_right
@[simp]
theorem nullHomotopicMap'_f_of_not_rel_right {k₁ k₀ : ι} (r₁₀ : c.Rel k₁ k₀)
(hk₁ : ∀ l : ι, ¬c.Rel l k₁) (h : ∀ i j, c.Rel j i → (C.X i ⟶ D.X j)) :
(nullHomotopicMap' h).f k₁ = C.d k₁ k₀ ≫ h k₀ k₁ r₁₀ := by
simp only [nullHomotopicMap']
rw [nullHomotopicMap_f_of_not_rel_right r₁₀ hk₁]
split_ifs
rfl
#align homotopy.null_homotopic_map'_f_of_not_rel_right Homotopy.nullHomotopicMap'_f_of_not_rel_right
@[simp]
theorem nullHomotopicMap_f_eq_zero {k₀ : ι} (hk₀ : ∀ l : ι, ¬c.Rel k₀ l)
(hk₀' : ∀ l : ι, ¬c.Rel l k₀) (hom : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) :
(nullHomotopicMap hom).f k₀ = 0 := by
dsimp [nullHomotopicMap, dNext, prevD]
rw [C.shape, D.shape, zero_comp, comp_zero, add_zero] <;> apply_assumption
#align homotopy.null_homotopic_map_f_eq_zero Homotopy.nullHomotopicMap_f_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem nullHomotopicMap'_f_eq_zero {k₀ : ι} (hk₀ : ∀ l : ι, ¬c.Rel k₀ l)
(hk₀' : ∀ l : ι, ¬c.Rel l k₀) (h : ∀ i j, c.Rel j i → (C.X i ⟶ D.X j)) :
(nullHomotopicMap' h).f k₀ = 0 := by
simp only [nullHomotopicMap']
apply nullHomotopicMap_f_eq_zero hk₀ hk₀'
#align homotopy.null_homotopic_map'_f_eq_zero Homotopy.nullHomotopicMap'_f_eq_zero
section MkInductive
variable {P Q : ChainComplex V ℕ}
@[simp 1100]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/Homotopy.lean | 477 | 481 | theorem prevD_chainComplex (f : ∀ i j, P.X i ⟶ Q.X j) (j : ℕ) :
prevD j f = f j (j + 1) ≫ Q.d _ _ := by |
dsimp [prevD]
have : (ComplexShape.down ℕ).prev j = j + 1 := ChainComplex.prev ℕ j
congr 2
|
import Mathlib.Data.List.Basic
namespace List
variable {α β : Type*}
#align list.length_enum_from List.enumFrom_length
#align list.length_enum List.enum_length
@[simp]
theorem get?_enumFrom :
∀ n (l : List α) m, get? (enumFrom n l) m = (get? l m).map fun a => (n + m, a)
| n, [], m => rfl
| n, a :: l, 0 => rfl
| n, a :: l, m + 1 => (get?_enumFrom (n + 1) l m).trans <| by rw [Nat.add_right_comm]; rfl
#align list.enum_from_nth List.get?_enumFrom
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-06")] alias enumFrom_get? := get?_enumFrom
@[simp]
theorem get?_enum (l : List α) (n) : get? (enum l) n = (get? l n).map fun a => (n, a) := by
rw [enum, get?_enumFrom, Nat.zero_add]
#align list.enum_nth List.get?_enum
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-06")] alias enum_get? := get?_enum
@[simp]
theorem enumFrom_map_snd : ∀ (n) (l : List α), map Prod.snd (enumFrom n l) = l
| _, [] => rfl
| _, _ :: _ => congr_arg (cons _) (enumFrom_map_snd _ _)
#align list.enum_from_map_snd List.enumFrom_map_snd
@[simp]
theorem enum_map_snd (l : List α) : map Prod.snd (enum l) = l :=
enumFrom_map_snd _ _
#align list.enum_map_snd List.enum_map_snd
@[simp]
theorem get_enumFrom (l : List α) (n) (i : Fin (l.enumFrom n).length) :
(l.enumFrom n).get i = (n + i, l.get (i.cast enumFrom_length)) := by
simp [get_eq_get?]
#align list.nth_le_enum_from List.get_enumFrom
@[simp]
theorem get_enum (l : List α) (i : Fin l.enum.length) :
l.enum.get i = (i.1, l.get (i.cast enum_length)) := by
simp [enum]
#align list.nth_le_enum List.get_enum
theorem mk_add_mem_enumFrom_iff_get? {n i : ℕ} {x : α} {l : List α} :
(n + i, x) ∈ enumFrom n l ↔ l.get? i = x := by
simp [mem_iff_get?]
theorem mk_mem_enumFrom_iff_le_and_get?_sub {n i : ℕ} {x : α} {l : List α} :
(i, x) ∈ enumFrom n l ↔ n ≤ i ∧ l.get? (i - n) = x := by
if h : n ≤ i then
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le h with ⟨i, rfl⟩
simp [mk_add_mem_enumFrom_iff_get?, Nat.add_sub_cancel_left]
else
have : ∀ k, n + k ≠ i := by rintro k rfl; simp at h
simp [h, mem_iff_get?, this]
theorem mk_mem_enum_iff_get? {i : ℕ} {x : α} {l : List α} : (i, x) ∈ enum l ↔ l.get? i = x := by
simp [enum, mk_mem_enumFrom_iff_le_and_get?_sub]
theorem mem_enum_iff_get? {x : ℕ × α} {l : List α} : x ∈ enum l ↔ l.get? x.1 = x.2 :=
mk_mem_enum_iff_get?
theorem le_fst_of_mem_enumFrom {x : ℕ × α} {n : ℕ} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ enumFrom n l) :
n ≤ x.1 :=
(mk_mem_enumFrom_iff_le_and_get?_sub.1 h).1
| Mathlib/Data/List/Enum.lean | 82 | 85 | theorem fst_lt_add_of_mem_enumFrom {x : ℕ × α} {n : ℕ} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ enumFrom n l) :
x.1 < n + length l := by |
rcases mem_iff_get.1 h with ⟨i, rfl⟩
simpa using i.is_lt
|
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Operations
#align_import data.real.ennreal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c14c8fcde993801fca8946b0d80131a1a81d1520"
open Set NNReal
namespace ENNReal
noncomputable section Inv
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
protected theorem div_eq_inv_mul : a / b = b⁻¹ * a := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm]
#align ennreal.div_eq_inv_mul ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul
@[simp] theorem inv_zero : (0 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ = ∞ :=
show sInf { b : ℝ≥0∞ | 1 ≤ 0 * b } = ∞ by simp
#align ennreal.inv_zero ENNReal.inv_zero
@[simp] theorem inv_top : ∞⁻¹ = 0 :=
bot_unique <| le_of_forall_le_of_dense fun a (h : 0 < a) => sInf_le <| by simp [*, h.ne', top_mul]
#align ennreal.inv_top ENNReal.inv_top
theorem coe_inv_le : (↑r⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ (↑r)⁻¹ :=
le_sInf fun b (hb : 1 ≤ ↑r * b) =>
coe_le_iff.2 <| by
rintro b rfl
apply NNReal.inv_le_of_le_mul
rwa [← coe_mul, ← coe_one, coe_le_coe] at hb
#align ennreal.coe_inv_le ENNReal.coe_inv_le
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inv (hr : r ≠ 0) : (↑r⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) = (↑r)⁻¹ :=
coe_inv_le.antisymm <| sInf_le <| mem_setOf.2 <| by rw [← coe_mul, mul_inv_cancel hr, coe_one]
#align ennreal.coe_inv ENNReal.coe_inv
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_inv_two : ((2⁻¹ : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞) = 2⁻¹ := by rw [coe_inv _root_.two_ne_zero, coe_two]
#align ennreal.coe_inv_two ENNReal.coe_inv_two
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_div (hr : r ≠ 0) : (↑(p / r) : ℝ≥0∞) = p / r := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, coe_mul, coe_inv hr]
#align ennreal.coe_div ENNReal.coe_div
lemma coe_div_le : ↑(p / r) ≤ (p / r : ℝ≥0∞) := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, coe_mul] using mul_le_mul_left' coe_inv_le _
theorem div_zero (h : a ≠ 0) : a / 0 = ∞ := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv, h]
#align ennreal.div_zero ENNReal.div_zero
instance : DivInvOneMonoid ℝ≥0∞ :=
{ inferInstanceAs (DivInvMonoid ℝ≥0∞) with
inv_one := by simpa only [coe_inv one_ne_zero, coe_one] using coe_inj.2 inv_one }
protected theorem inv_pow : ∀ {a : ℝ≥0∞} {n : ℕ}, (a ^ n)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ ^ n
| _, 0 => by simp only [pow_zero, inv_one]
| ⊤, n + 1 => by simp [top_pow]
| (a : ℝ≥0), n + 1 => by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· simp [top_pow]
· have := pow_ne_zero (n + 1) ha
norm_cast
rw [inv_pow]
#align ennreal.inv_pow ENNReal.inv_pow
protected theorem mul_inv_cancel (h0 : a ≠ 0) (ht : a ≠ ∞) : a * a⁻¹ = 1 := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ht
norm_cast at h0; norm_cast
exact mul_inv_cancel h0
#align ennreal.mul_inv_cancel ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel
protected theorem inv_mul_cancel (h0 : a ≠ 0) (ht : a ≠ ∞) : a⁻¹ * a = 1 :=
mul_comm a a⁻¹ ▸ ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel h0 ht
#align ennreal.inv_mul_cancel ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel
protected theorem div_mul_cancel (h0 : a ≠ 0) (hI : a ≠ ∞) : b / a * a = b := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel h0 hI, mul_one]
#align ennreal.div_mul_cancel ENNReal.div_mul_cancel
protected theorem mul_div_cancel' (h0 : a ≠ 0) (hI : a ≠ ∞) : a * (b / a) = b := by
rw [mul_comm, ENNReal.div_mul_cancel h0 hI]
#align ennreal.mul_div_cancel' ENNReal.mul_div_cancel'
-- Porting note: `simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm, mul_assoc]` doesn't work in the following two
protected theorem mul_comm_div : a / b * c = a * (c / b) := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_right_comm, ← mul_assoc]
#align ennreal.mul_comm_div ENNReal.mul_comm_div
protected theorem mul_div_right_comm : a * b / c = a / c * b := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_right_comm]
#align ennreal.mul_div_right_comm ENNReal.mul_div_right_comm
instance : InvolutiveInv ℝ≥0∞ where
inv_inv a := by
by_cases a = 0 <;> cases a <;> simp_all [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, -coe_inv, (coe_inv _).symm]
@[simp] protected lemma inv_eq_one : a⁻¹ = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by rw [← inv_inj, inv_inv, inv_one]
@[simp] theorem inv_eq_top : a⁻¹ = ∞ ↔ a = 0 := inv_zero ▸ inv_inj
#align ennreal.inv_eq_top ENNReal.inv_eq_top
theorem inv_ne_top : a⁻¹ ≠ ∞ ↔ a ≠ 0 := by simp
#align ennreal.inv_ne_top ENNReal.inv_ne_top
@[simp]
theorem inv_lt_top {x : ℝ≥0∞} : x⁻¹ < ∞ ↔ 0 < x := by
simp only [lt_top_iff_ne_top, inv_ne_top, pos_iff_ne_zero]
#align ennreal.inv_lt_top ENNReal.inv_lt_top
theorem div_lt_top {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (h1 : x ≠ ∞) (h2 : y ≠ 0) : x / y < ∞ :=
mul_lt_top h1 (inv_ne_top.mpr h2)
#align ennreal.div_lt_top ENNReal.div_lt_top
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_eq_zero : a⁻¹ = 0 ↔ a = ∞ :=
inv_top ▸ inv_inj
#align ennreal.inv_eq_zero ENNReal.inv_eq_zero
protected theorem inv_ne_zero : a⁻¹ ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ ∞ := by simp
#align ennreal.inv_ne_zero ENNReal.inv_ne_zero
protected theorem div_pos (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : 0 < a / b :=
ENNReal.mul_pos ha <| ENNReal.inv_ne_zero.2 hb
#align ennreal.div_pos ENNReal.div_pos
protected theorem mul_inv {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ∞) (hb : a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ 0) :
(a * b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ * b⁻¹ := by
induction' b with b
· replace ha : a ≠ 0 := ha.neg_resolve_right rfl
simp [ha]
induction' a with a
· replace hb : b ≠ 0 := coe_ne_zero.1 (hb.neg_resolve_left rfl)
simp [hb]
by_cases h'a : a = 0
· simp only [h'a, top_mul, ENNReal.inv_zero, ENNReal.coe_ne_top, zero_mul, Ne,
not_false_iff, ENNReal.coe_zero, ENNReal.inv_eq_zero]
by_cases h'b : b = 0
· simp only [h'b, ENNReal.inv_zero, ENNReal.coe_ne_top, mul_top, Ne, not_false_iff,
mul_zero, ENNReal.coe_zero, ENNReal.inv_eq_zero]
rw [← ENNReal.coe_mul, ← ENNReal.coe_inv, ← ENNReal.coe_inv h'a, ← ENNReal.coe_inv h'b, ←
ENNReal.coe_mul, mul_inv_rev, mul_comm]
simp [h'a, h'b]
#align ennreal.mul_inv ENNReal.mul_inv
protected theorem mul_div_mul_left (a b : ℝ≥0∞) (hc : c ≠ 0) (hc' : c ≠ ⊤) :
c * a / (c * b) = a / b := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.mul_inv (Or.inl hc) (Or.inl hc'), mul_mul_mul_comm,
ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hc hc', one_mul]
#align ennreal.mul_div_mul_left ENNReal.mul_div_mul_left
protected theorem mul_div_mul_right (a b : ℝ≥0∞) (hc : c ≠ 0) (hc' : c ≠ ⊤) :
a * c / (b * c) = a / b := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.mul_inv (Or.inr hc') (Or.inr hc), mul_mul_mul_comm,
ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hc hc', mul_one]
#align ennreal.mul_div_mul_right ENNReal.mul_div_mul_right
protected theorem sub_div (h : 0 < b → b < a → c ≠ 0) : (a - b) / c = a / c - b / c := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact ENNReal.sub_mul (by simpa using h)
#align ennreal.sub_div ENNReal.sub_div
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_pos : 0 < a⁻¹ ↔ a ≠ ∞ :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans ENNReal.inv_ne_zero
#align ennreal.inv_pos ENNReal.inv_pos
theorem inv_strictAnti : StrictAnti (Inv.inv : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) := by
intro a b h
lift a to ℝ≥0 using h.ne_top
induction b; · simp
rw [coe_lt_coe] at h
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha); · simp [h]
rw [← coe_inv h.ne_bot, ← coe_inv ha, coe_lt_coe]
exact NNReal.inv_lt_inv ha h
#align ennreal.inv_strict_anti ENNReal.inv_strictAnti
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_lt_inv : a⁻¹ < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a :=
inv_strictAnti.lt_iff_lt
#align ennreal.inv_lt_inv ENNReal.inv_lt_inv
theorem inv_lt_iff_inv_lt : a⁻¹ < b ↔ b⁻¹ < a := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using @ENNReal.inv_lt_inv a b⁻¹
#align ennreal.inv_lt_iff_inv_lt ENNReal.inv_lt_iff_inv_lt
theorem lt_inv_iff_lt_inv : a < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a⁻¹ := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using @ENNReal.inv_lt_inv a⁻¹ b
#align ennreal.lt_inv_iff_lt_inv ENNReal.lt_inv_iff_lt_inv
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_le_inv : a⁻¹ ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a :=
inv_strictAnti.le_iff_le
#align ennreal.inv_le_inv ENNReal.inv_le_inv
theorem inv_le_iff_inv_le : a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ b⁻¹ ≤ a := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using @ENNReal.inv_le_inv a b⁻¹
#align ennreal.inv_le_iff_inv_le ENNReal.inv_le_iff_inv_le
theorem le_inv_iff_le_inv : a ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a⁻¹ := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using @ENNReal.inv_le_inv a⁻¹ b
#align ennreal.le_inv_iff_le_inv ENNReal.le_inv_iff_le_inv
@[gcongr] protected theorem inv_le_inv' (h : a ≤ b) : b⁻¹ ≤ a⁻¹ :=
ENNReal.inv_strictAnti.antitone h
@[gcongr] protected theorem inv_lt_inv' (h : a < b) : b⁻¹ < a⁻¹ := ENNReal.inv_strictAnti h
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_le_one : a⁻¹ ≤ 1 ↔ 1 ≤ a := by rw [inv_le_iff_inv_le, inv_one]
#align ennreal.inv_le_one ENNReal.inv_le_one
protected theorem one_le_inv : 1 ≤ a⁻¹ ↔ a ≤ 1 := by rw [le_inv_iff_le_inv, inv_one]
#align ennreal.one_le_inv ENNReal.one_le_inv
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_lt_one : a⁻¹ < 1 ↔ 1 < a := by rw [inv_lt_iff_inv_lt, inv_one]
#align ennreal.inv_lt_one ENNReal.inv_lt_one
@[simp]
protected theorem one_lt_inv : 1 < a⁻¹ ↔ a < 1 := by rw [lt_inv_iff_lt_inv, inv_one]
#align ennreal.one_lt_inv ENNReal.one_lt_inv
@[simps! apply]
def _root_.OrderIso.invENNReal : ℝ≥0∞ ≃o ℝ≥0∞ᵒᵈ where
map_rel_iff' := ENNReal.inv_le_inv
toEquiv := (Equiv.inv ℝ≥0∞).trans OrderDual.toDual
#align order_iso.inv_ennreal OrderIso.invENNReal
#align order_iso.inv_ennreal_apply OrderIso.invENNReal_apply
@[simp]
theorem _root_.OrderIso.invENNReal_symm_apply (a : ℝ≥0∞ᵒᵈ) :
OrderIso.invENNReal.symm a = (OrderDual.ofDual a)⁻¹ :=
rfl
#align order_iso.inv_ennreal_symm_apply OrderIso.invENNReal_symm_apply
@[simp] theorem div_top : a / ∞ = 0 := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_top, mul_zero]
#align ennreal.div_top ENNReal.div_top
-- Porting note: reordered 4 lemmas
theorem top_div : ∞ / a = if a = ∞ then 0 else ∞ := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv, top_mul']
#align ennreal.top_div ENNReal.top_div
theorem top_div_of_ne_top (h : a ≠ ∞) : ∞ / a = ∞ := by simp [top_div, h]
#align ennreal.top_div_of_ne_top ENNReal.top_div_of_ne_top
@[simp] theorem top_div_coe : ∞ / p = ∞ := top_div_of_ne_top coe_ne_top
#align ennreal.top_div_coe ENNReal.top_div_coe
theorem top_div_of_lt_top (h : a < ∞) : ∞ / a = ∞ := top_div_of_ne_top h.ne
#align ennreal.top_div_of_lt_top ENNReal.top_div_of_lt_top
@[simp] protected theorem zero_div : 0 / a = 0 := zero_mul a⁻¹
#align ennreal.zero_div ENNReal.zero_div
theorem div_eq_top : a / b = ∞ ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b = 0 ∨ a = ∞ ∧ b ≠ ∞ := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.mul_eq_top]
#align ennreal.div_eq_top ENNReal.div_eq_top
protected theorem le_div_iff_mul_le (h0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ 0) (ht : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ ∞) :
a ≤ c / b ↔ a * b ≤ c := by
induction' b with b
· lift c to ℝ≥0 using ht.neg_resolve_left rfl
rw [div_top, nonpos_iff_eq_zero]
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha) <;> simp [*]
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb)
· have hc : c ≠ 0 := h0.neg_resolve_left rfl
simp [div_zero hc]
· rw [← coe_ne_zero] at hb
rw [← ENNReal.mul_le_mul_right hb coe_ne_top, ENNReal.div_mul_cancel hb coe_ne_top]
#align ennreal.le_div_iff_mul_le ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le
protected theorem div_le_iff_le_mul (hb0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ ∞) (hbt : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ 0) :
a / b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c * b := by
suffices a * b⁻¹ ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c / b⁻¹ by simpa [div_eq_mul_inv]
refine (ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le ?_ ?_).symm <;> simpa
#align ennreal.div_le_iff_le_mul ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul
protected theorem lt_div_iff_mul_lt (hb0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ ∞) (hbt : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ 0) :
c < a / b ↔ c * b < a :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul hb0 hbt)
#align ennreal.lt_div_iff_mul_lt ENNReal.lt_div_iff_mul_lt
theorem div_le_of_le_mul (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / c ≤ b := by
by_cases h0 : c = 0
· have : a = 0 := by simpa [h0] using h
simp [*]
by_cases hinf : c = ∞; · simp [hinf]
exact (ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul (Or.inl h0) (Or.inl hinf)).2 h
#align ennreal.div_le_of_le_mul ENNReal.div_le_of_le_mul
theorem div_le_of_le_mul' (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / b ≤ c :=
div_le_of_le_mul <| mul_comm b c ▸ h
#align ennreal.div_le_of_le_mul' ENNReal.div_le_of_le_mul'
protected theorem div_self_le_one : a / a ≤ 1 := div_le_of_le_mul <| by rw [one_mul]
theorem mul_le_of_le_div (h : a ≤ b / c) : a * c ≤ b := by
rw [← inv_inv c]
exact div_le_of_le_mul h
#align ennreal.mul_le_of_le_div ENNReal.mul_le_of_le_div
theorem mul_le_of_le_div' (h : a ≤ b / c) : c * a ≤ b :=
mul_comm a c ▸ mul_le_of_le_div h
#align ennreal.mul_le_of_le_div' ENNReal.mul_le_of_le_div'
protected theorem div_lt_iff (h0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ 0) (ht : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ ∞) : c / b < a ↔ c < a * b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le h0 ht
#align ennreal.div_lt_iff ENNReal.div_lt_iff
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div (h : a < b / c) : a * c < b := by
contrapose! h
exact ENNReal.div_le_of_le_mul h
#align ennreal.mul_lt_of_lt_div ENNReal.mul_lt_of_lt_div
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div' (h : a < b / c) : c * a < b :=
mul_comm a c ▸ mul_lt_of_lt_div h
#align ennreal.mul_lt_of_lt_div' ENNReal.mul_lt_of_lt_div'
theorem div_lt_of_lt_mul (h : a < b * c) : a / c < b :=
mul_lt_of_lt_div <| by rwa [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_inv]
theorem div_lt_of_lt_mul' (h : a < b * c) : a / b < c :=
div_lt_of_lt_mul <| by rwa [mul_comm]
theorem inv_le_iff_le_mul (h₁ : b = ∞ → a ≠ 0) (h₂ : a = ∞ → b ≠ 0) : a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ 1 ≤ a * b := by
rw [← one_div, ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul, mul_comm]
exacts [or_not_of_imp h₁, not_or_of_imp h₂]
#align ennreal.inv_le_iff_le_mul ENNReal.inv_le_iff_le_mul
@[simp 900]
theorem le_inv_iff_mul_le : a ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ a * b ≤ 1 := by
rw [← one_div, ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le] <;>
· right
simp
#align ennreal.le_inv_iff_mul_le ENNReal.le_inv_iff_mul_le
@[gcongr] protected theorem div_le_div (hab : a ≤ b) (hdc : d ≤ c) : a / c ≤ b / d :=
div_eq_mul_inv b d ▸ div_eq_mul_inv a c ▸ mul_le_mul' hab (ENNReal.inv_le_inv.mpr hdc)
#align ennreal.div_le_div ENNReal.div_le_div
@[gcongr] protected theorem div_le_div_left (h : a ≤ b) (c : ℝ≥0∞) : c / b ≤ c / a :=
ENNReal.div_le_div le_rfl h
#align ennreal.div_le_div_left ENNReal.div_le_div_left
@[gcongr] protected theorem div_le_div_right (h : a ≤ b) (c : ℝ≥0∞) : a / c ≤ b / c :=
ENNReal.div_le_div h le_rfl
#align ennreal.div_le_div_right ENNReal.div_le_div_right
protected theorem eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left (h : a * b = 1) : a = b⁻¹ := by
rw [← mul_one a, ← ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel (right_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one h), ← mul_assoc, h,
one_mul]
rintro rfl
simp [left_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one h] at h
#align ennreal.eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left ENNReal.eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left
theorem mul_le_iff_le_inv {a b r : ℝ≥0∞} (hr₀ : r ≠ 0) (hr₁ : r ≠ ∞) : r * a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ r⁻¹ * b := by
rw [← @ENNReal.mul_le_mul_left _ a _ hr₀ hr₁, ← mul_assoc, ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hr₀ hr₁,
one_mul]
#align ennreal.mul_le_iff_le_inv ENNReal.mul_le_iff_le_inv
instance : PosSMulStrictMono ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0∞ where
elim _r hr _a _b hab := ENNReal.mul_lt_mul_left' (coe_pos.2 hr).ne' coe_ne_top hab
instance : SMulPosMono ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0∞ where
elim _r _ _a _b hab := mul_le_mul_right' (coe_le_coe.2 hab) _
#align ennreal.le_inv_smul_iff_of_pos le_inv_smul_iff_of_pos
#align ennreal.inv_smul_le_iff_of_pos inv_smul_le_iff_of_pos
theorem le_of_forall_nnreal_lt {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ r : ℝ≥0, ↑r < x → ↑r ≤ y) : x ≤ y := by
refine le_of_forall_ge_of_dense fun r hr => ?_
lift r to ℝ≥0 using ne_top_of_lt hr
exact h r hr
#align ennreal.le_of_forall_nnreal_lt ENNReal.le_of_forall_nnreal_lt
theorem le_of_forall_pos_nnreal_lt {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ r : ℝ≥0, 0 < r → ↑r < x → ↑r ≤ y) : x ≤ y :=
le_of_forall_nnreal_lt fun r hr =>
(zero_le r).eq_or_lt.elim (fun h => h ▸ zero_le _) fun h0 => h r h0 hr
#align ennreal.le_of_forall_pos_nnreal_lt ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_nnreal_lt
theorem eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le {x : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ r : ℝ≥0, ↑r ≤ x) : x = ∞ :=
top_unique <| le_of_forall_nnreal_lt fun r _ => h r
#align ennreal.eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le ENNReal.eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le
protected theorem add_div : (a + b) / c = a / c + b / c :=
right_distrib a b c⁻¹
#align ennreal.add_div ENNReal.add_div
protected theorem div_add_div_same {a b c : ℝ≥0∞} : a / c + b / c = (a + b) / c :=
ENNReal.add_div.symm
#align ennreal.div_add_div_same ENNReal.div_add_div_same
protected theorem div_self (h0 : a ≠ 0) (hI : a ≠ ∞) : a / a = 1 :=
ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel h0 hI
#align ennreal.div_self ENNReal.div_self
theorem mul_div_le : a * (b / a) ≤ b :=
mul_le_of_le_div' le_rfl
#align ennreal.mul_div_le ENNReal.mul_div_le
theorem eq_div_iff (ha : a ≠ 0) (ha' : a ≠ ∞) : b = c / a ↔ a * b = c :=
⟨fun h => by rw [h, ENNReal.mul_div_cancel' ha ha'], fun h => by
rw [← h, mul_div_assoc, ENNReal.mul_div_cancel' ha ha']⟩
#align ennreal.eq_div_iff ENNReal.eq_div_iff
protected theorem div_eq_div_iff (ha : a ≠ 0) (ha' : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ 0) (hb' : b ≠ ∞) :
c / b = d / a ↔ a * c = b * d := by
rw [eq_div_iff ha ha']
conv_rhs => rw [eq_comm]
rw [← eq_div_iff hb hb', mul_div_assoc, eq_comm]
#align ennreal.div_eq_div_iff ENNReal.div_eq_div_iff
theorem div_eq_one_iff {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (hb₀ : b ≠ 0) (hb₁ : b ≠ ∞) : a / b = 1 ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← (eq_div_iff hb₀ hb₁).mp h.symm, mul_one], fun h =>
h.symm ▸ ENNReal.div_self hb₀ hb₁⟩
#align ennreal.div_eq_one_iff ENNReal.div_eq_one_iff
theorem inv_two_add_inv_two : (2 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ + 2⁻¹ = 1 := by
rw [← two_mul, ← div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.div_self two_ne_zero two_ne_top]
#align ennreal.inv_two_add_inv_two ENNReal.inv_two_add_inv_two
theorem inv_three_add_inv_three : (3 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ + 3⁻¹ + 3⁻¹ = 1 :=
calc (3 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ + 3⁻¹ + 3⁻¹ = 3 * 3⁻¹ := by ring
_ = 1 := ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel (Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 <| by decide) coe_ne_top
#align ennreal.inv_three_add_inv_three ENNReal.inv_three_add_inv_three
@[simp]
protected theorem add_halves (a : ℝ≥0∞) : a / 2 + a / 2 = a := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_add, inv_two_add_inv_two, mul_one]
#align ennreal.add_halves ENNReal.add_halves
@[simp]
theorem add_thirds (a : ℝ≥0∞) : a / 3 + a / 3 + a / 3 = a := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_add, ← mul_add, inv_three_add_inv_three, mul_one]
#align ennreal.add_thirds ENNReal.add_thirds
@[simp] theorem div_eq_zero_iff : a / b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = ∞ := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
#align ennreal.div_zero_iff ENNReal.div_eq_zero_iff
@[simp] theorem div_pos_iff : 0 < a / b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ ∞ := by simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, not_or]
#align ennreal.div_pos_iff ENNReal.div_pos_iff
protected theorem half_pos (h : a ≠ 0) : 0 < a / 2 := by
simp only [div_pos_iff, ne_eq, h, not_false_eq_true, two_ne_top, and_self]
#align ennreal.half_pos ENNReal.half_pos
protected theorem one_half_lt_one : (2⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) < 1 :=
ENNReal.inv_lt_one.2 <| one_lt_two
#align ennreal.one_half_lt_one ENNReal.one_half_lt_one
protected theorem half_lt_self (hz : a ≠ 0) (ht : a ≠ ∞) : a / 2 < a := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ht
rw [coe_ne_zero] at hz
rw [← coe_two, ← coe_div, coe_lt_coe]
exacts [NNReal.half_lt_self hz, two_ne_zero' _]
#align ennreal.half_lt_self ENNReal.half_lt_self
protected theorem half_le_self : a / 2 ≤ a :=
le_add_self.trans_eq <| ENNReal.add_halves _
#align ennreal.half_le_self ENNReal.half_le_self
theorem sub_half (h : a ≠ ∞) : a - a / 2 = a / 2 := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using h
exact sub_eq_of_add_eq (mul_ne_top coe_ne_top <| by simp) (ENNReal.add_halves a)
#align ennreal.sub_half ENNReal.sub_half
@[simp]
theorem one_sub_inv_two : (1 : ℝ≥0∞) - 2⁻¹ = 2⁻¹ := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, one_mul] using sub_half one_ne_top
#align ennreal.one_sub_inv_two ENNReal.one_sub_inv_two
@[simps! apply_coe]
def orderIsoIicOneBirational : ℝ≥0∞ ≃o Iic (1 : ℝ≥0∞) := by
refine StrictMono.orderIsoOfRightInverse
(fun x => ⟨(x⁻¹ + 1)⁻¹, ENNReal.inv_le_one.2 <| le_add_self⟩)
(fun x y hxy => ?_) (fun x => (x.1⁻¹ - 1)⁻¹) fun x => Subtype.ext ?_
· simpa only [Subtype.mk_lt_mk, ENNReal.inv_lt_inv, ENNReal.add_lt_add_iff_right one_ne_top]
· have : (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ x.1⁻¹ := ENNReal.one_le_inv.2 x.2
simp only [inv_inv, Subtype.coe_mk, tsub_add_cancel_of_le this]
#align ennreal.order_iso_Iic_one_birational ENNReal.orderIsoIicOneBirational
@[simp]
theorem orderIsoIicOneBirational_symm_apply (x : Iic (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) :
orderIsoIicOneBirational.symm x = (x.1⁻¹ - 1)⁻¹ :=
rfl
#align ennreal.order_iso_Iic_one_birational_symm_apply ENNReal.orderIsoIicOneBirational_symm_apply
@[simps! apply_coe]
def orderIsoIicCoe (a : ℝ≥0) : Iic (a : ℝ≥0∞) ≃o Iic a :=
OrderIso.symm
{ toFun := fun x => ⟨x, coe_le_coe.2 x.2⟩
invFun := fun x => ⟨ENNReal.toNNReal x, coe_le_coe.1 <| coe_toNNReal_le_self.trans x.2⟩
left_inv := fun x => Subtype.ext <| toNNReal_coe
right_inv := fun x => Subtype.ext <| coe_toNNReal (ne_top_of_le_ne_top coe_ne_top x.2)
map_rel_iff' := fun {_ _} => by
simp only [Equiv.coe_fn_mk, Subtype.mk_le_mk, coe_le_coe, Subtype.coe_le_coe] }
#align ennreal.order_iso_Iic_coe ENNReal.orderIsoIicCoe
@[simp]
theorem orderIsoIicCoe_symm_apply_coe (a : ℝ≥0) (b : Iic a) :
((orderIsoIicCoe a).symm b : ℝ≥0∞) = b :=
rfl
#align ennreal.order_iso_Iic_coe_symm_apply_coe ENNReal.orderIsoIicCoe_symm_apply_coe
def orderIsoUnitIntervalBirational : ℝ≥0∞ ≃o Icc (0 : ℝ) 1 :=
orderIsoIicOneBirational.trans <| (orderIsoIicCoe 1).trans <| (NNReal.orderIsoIccZeroCoe 1).symm
#align ennreal.order_iso_unit_interval_birational ENNReal.orderIsoUnitIntervalBirational
@[simp]
theorem orderIsoUnitIntervalBirational_apply_coe (x : ℝ≥0∞) :
(orderIsoUnitIntervalBirational x : ℝ) = (x⁻¹ + 1)⁻¹.toReal :=
rfl
#align ennreal.order_iso_unit_interval_birational_apply_coe ENNReal.orderIsoUnitIntervalBirational_apply_coe
theorem exists_inv_nat_lt {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a ≠ 0) : ∃ n : ℕ, (n : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ < a :=
inv_inv a ▸ by simp only [ENNReal.inv_lt_inv, ENNReal.exists_nat_gt (inv_ne_top.2 h)]
#align ennreal.exists_inv_nat_lt ENNReal.exists_inv_nat_lt
theorem exists_nat_pos_mul_gt (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : ∃ n > 0, b < (n : ℕ) * a :=
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := ENNReal.exists_nat_gt (div_lt_top hb ha).ne
⟨n, Nat.cast_pos.1 ((zero_le _).trans_lt hn), by
rwa [← ENNReal.div_lt_iff (Or.inl ha) (Or.inr hb)]⟩
#align ennreal.exists_nat_pos_mul_gt ENNReal.exists_nat_pos_mul_gt
theorem exists_nat_mul_gt (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : ∃ n : ℕ, b < n * a :=
(exists_nat_pos_mul_gt ha hb).imp fun _ => And.right
#align ennreal.exists_nat_mul_gt ENNReal.exists_nat_mul_gt
theorem exists_nat_pos_inv_mul_lt (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
∃ n > 0, ((n : ℕ) : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ * a < b := by
rcases exists_nat_pos_mul_gt hb ha with ⟨n, npos, hn⟩
use n, npos
rw [← ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul]
exact div_lt_of_lt_mul' hn
#align ennreal.exists_nat_pos_inv_mul_lt ENNReal.exists_nat_pos_inv_mul_lt
theorem exists_nnreal_pos_mul_lt (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ 0) : ∃ n > 0, ↑(n : ℝ≥0) * a < b := by
rcases exists_nat_pos_inv_mul_lt ha hb with ⟨n, npos : 0 < n, hn⟩
use (n : ℝ≥0)⁻¹
simp [*, npos.ne', zero_lt_one]
#align ennreal.exists_nnreal_pos_mul_lt ENNReal.exists_nnreal_pos_mul_lt
theorem exists_inv_two_pow_lt (ha : a ≠ 0) : ∃ n : ℕ, 2⁻¹ ^ n < a := by
rcases exists_inv_nat_lt ha with ⟨n, hn⟩
refine ⟨n, lt_trans ?_ hn⟩
rw [← ENNReal.inv_pow, ENNReal.inv_lt_inv]
norm_cast
exact n.lt_two_pow
#align ennreal.exists_inv_two_pow_lt ENNReal.exists_inv_two_pow_lt
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zpow (hr : r ≠ 0) (n : ℤ) : (↑(r ^ n) : ℝ≥0∞) = (r : ℝ≥0∞) ^ n := by
cases' n with n n
· simp only [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, coe_pow, zpow_natCast]
· have : r ^ n.succ ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero (n + 1) hr
simp only [zpow_negSucc, coe_inv this, coe_pow]
#align ennreal.coe_zpow ENNReal.coe_zpow
theorem zpow_pos (ha : a ≠ 0) (h'a : a ≠ ∞) (n : ℤ) : 0 < a ^ n := by
cases n
· simpa using ENNReal.pow_pos ha.bot_lt _
· simp only [h'a, pow_eq_top_iff, zpow_negSucc, Ne, not_false, ENNReal.inv_pos, false_and,
not_false_eq_true]
#align ennreal.zpow_pos ENNReal.zpow_pos
theorem zpow_lt_top (ha : a ≠ 0) (h'a : a ≠ ∞) (n : ℤ) : a ^ n < ∞ := by
cases n
· simpa using ENNReal.pow_lt_top h'a.lt_top _
· simp only [ENNReal.pow_pos ha.bot_lt, zpow_negSucc, inv_lt_top]
#align ennreal.zpow_lt_top ENNReal.zpow_lt_top
theorem exists_mem_Ico_zpow {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (hx : x ≠ 0) (h'x : x ≠ ∞) (hy : 1 < y) (h'y : y ≠ ⊤) :
∃ n : ℤ, x ∈ Ico (y ^ n) (y ^ (n + 1)) := by
lift x to ℝ≥0 using h'x
lift y to ℝ≥0 using h'y
have A : y ≠ 0 := by simpa only [Ne, coe_eq_zero] using (zero_lt_one.trans hy).ne'
obtain ⟨n, hn, h'n⟩ : ∃ n : ℤ, y ^ n ≤ x ∧ x < y ^ (n + 1) := by
refine NNReal.exists_mem_Ico_zpow ?_ (one_lt_coe_iff.1 hy)
simpa only [Ne, coe_eq_zero] using hx
refine ⟨n, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [← ENNReal.coe_zpow A, ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
· rwa [← ENNReal.coe_zpow A, ENNReal.coe_lt_coe]
#align ennreal.exists_mem_Ico_zpow ENNReal.exists_mem_Ico_zpow
theorem exists_mem_Ioc_zpow {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (hx : x ≠ 0) (h'x : x ≠ ∞) (hy : 1 < y) (h'y : y ≠ ⊤) :
∃ n : ℤ, x ∈ Ioc (y ^ n) (y ^ (n + 1)) := by
lift x to ℝ≥0 using h'x
lift y to ℝ≥0 using h'y
have A : y ≠ 0 := by simpa only [Ne, coe_eq_zero] using (zero_lt_one.trans hy).ne'
obtain ⟨n, hn, h'n⟩ : ∃ n : ℤ, y ^ n < x ∧ x ≤ y ^ (n + 1) := by
refine NNReal.exists_mem_Ioc_zpow ?_ (one_lt_coe_iff.1 hy)
simpa only [Ne, coe_eq_zero] using hx
refine ⟨n, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [← ENNReal.coe_zpow A, ENNReal.coe_lt_coe]
· rwa [← ENNReal.coe_zpow A, ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
#align ennreal.exists_mem_Ioc_zpow ENNReal.exists_mem_Ioc_zpow
theorem Ioo_zero_top_eq_iUnion_Ico_zpow {y : ℝ≥0∞} (hy : 1 < y) (h'y : y ≠ ⊤) :
Ioo (0 : ℝ≥0∞) (∞ : ℝ≥0∞) = ⋃ n : ℤ, Ico (y ^ n) (y ^ (n + 1)) := by
ext x
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_Ioo, mem_Ico]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hx, h'x⟩
exact exists_mem_Ico_zpow hx.ne' h'x.ne hy h'y
· rintro ⟨n, hn, h'n⟩
constructor
· apply lt_of_lt_of_le _ hn
exact ENNReal.zpow_pos (zero_lt_one.trans hy).ne' h'y _
· apply lt_trans h'n _
exact ENNReal.zpow_lt_top (zero_lt_one.trans hy).ne' h'y _
#align ennreal.Ioo_zero_top_eq_Union_Ico_zpow ENNReal.Ioo_zero_top_eq_iUnion_Ico_zpow
@[gcongr]
| Mathlib/Data/ENNReal/Inv.lean | 650 | 661 | theorem zpow_le_of_le {x : ℝ≥0∞} (hx : 1 ≤ x) {a b : ℤ} (h : a ≤ b) : x ^ a ≤ x ^ b := by |
induction' a with a a <;> induction' b with b b
· simp only [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, zpow_natCast]
exact pow_le_pow_right hx (Int.le_of_ofNat_le_ofNat h)
· apply absurd h (not_le_of_gt _)
exact lt_of_lt_of_le (Int.negSucc_lt_zero _) (Int.ofNat_nonneg _)
· simp only [zpow_negSucc, Int.ofNat_eq_coe, zpow_natCast]
refine (ENNReal.inv_le_one.2 ?_).trans ?_ <;> exact one_le_pow_of_one_le' hx _
· simp only [zpow_negSucc, ENNReal.inv_le_inv]
apply pow_le_pow_right hx
simpa only [← Int.ofNat_le, neg_le_neg_iff, Int.ofNat_add, Int.ofNat_one, Int.negSucc_eq] using
h
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.OfAssociative
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Reindex
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.ToLinearEquiv
#align_import algebra.lie.matrix from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"55e2dfde0cff928ce5c70926a3f2c7dee3e2dd99"
universe u v w w₁ w₂
section Matrices
open scoped Matrix
variable {R : Type u} [CommRing R]
variable {n : Type w} [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n]
def lieEquivMatrix' : Module.End R (n → R) ≃ₗ⁅R⁆ Matrix n n R :=
{ LinearMap.toMatrix' with
map_lie' := fun {T S} => by
let f := @LinearMap.toMatrix' R _ n n _ _
change f (T.comp S - S.comp T) = f T * f S - f S * f T
have h : ∀ T S : Module.End R _, f (T.comp S) = f T * f S := LinearMap.toMatrix'_comp
rw [map_sub, h, h] }
#align lie_equiv_matrix' lieEquivMatrix'
@[simp]
theorem lieEquivMatrix'_apply (f : Module.End R (n → R)) :
lieEquivMatrix' f = LinearMap.toMatrix' f :=
rfl
#align lie_equiv_matrix'_apply lieEquivMatrix'_apply
@[simp]
theorem lieEquivMatrix'_symm_apply (A : Matrix n n R) :
(@lieEquivMatrix' R _ n _ _).symm A = Matrix.toLin' A :=
rfl
#align lie_equiv_matrix'_symm_apply lieEquivMatrix'_symm_apply
def Matrix.lieConj (P : Matrix n n R) (h : Invertible P) : Matrix n n R ≃ₗ⁅R⁆ Matrix n n R :=
((@lieEquivMatrix' R _ n _ _).symm.trans (P.toLinearEquiv' h).lieConj).trans lieEquivMatrix'
#align matrix.lie_conj Matrix.lieConj
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Matrix.lean | 69 | 72 | theorem Matrix.lieConj_apply (P A : Matrix n n R) (h : Invertible P) :
P.lieConj h A = P * A * P⁻¹ := by |
simp [LinearEquiv.conj_apply, Matrix.lieConj, LinearMap.toMatrix'_comp,
LinearMap.toMatrix'_toLin']
|
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bitwise
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Game.Birthday
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Game.Impartial
#align_import set_theory.game.nim from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"92ca63f0fb391a9ca5f22d2409a6080e786d99f7"
noncomputable section
universe u
namespace SetTheory
open scoped PGame
namespace PGame
-- Uses `noncomputable!` to avoid `rec_fn_macro only allowed in meta definitions` VM error
noncomputable def nim : Ordinal.{u} → PGame.{u}
| o₁ =>
let f o₂ :=
have _ : Ordinal.typein o₁.out.r o₂ < o₁ := Ordinal.typein_lt_self o₂
nim (Ordinal.typein o₁.out.r o₂)
⟨o₁.out.α, o₁.out.α, f, f⟩
termination_by o => o
#align pgame.nim SetTheory.PGame.nim
open Ordinal
theorem nim_def (o : Ordinal) :
have : IsWellOrder (Quotient.out o).α (· < ·) := inferInstance
nim o =
PGame.mk o.out.α o.out.α (fun o₂ => nim (Ordinal.typein (· < ·) o₂)) fun o₂ =>
nim (Ordinal.typein (· < ·) o₂) := by
rw [nim]; rfl
#align pgame.nim_def SetTheory.PGame.nim_def
theorem leftMoves_nim (o : Ordinal) : (nim o).LeftMoves = o.out.α := by rw [nim_def]; rfl
#align pgame.left_moves_nim SetTheory.PGame.leftMoves_nim
theorem rightMoves_nim (o : Ordinal) : (nim o).RightMoves = o.out.α := by rw [nim_def]; rfl
#align pgame.right_moves_nim SetTheory.PGame.rightMoves_nim
theorem moveLeft_nim_hEq (o : Ordinal) :
have : IsWellOrder (Quotient.out o).α (· < ·) := inferInstance
HEq (nim o).moveLeft fun i : o.out.α => nim (typein (· < ·) i) := by rw [nim_def]; rfl
#align pgame.move_left_nim_heq SetTheory.PGame.moveLeft_nim_hEq
theorem moveRight_nim_hEq (o : Ordinal) :
have : IsWellOrder (Quotient.out o).α (· < ·) := inferInstance
HEq (nim o).moveRight fun i : o.out.α => nim (typein (· < ·) i) := by rw [nim_def]; rfl
#align pgame.move_right_nim_heq SetTheory.PGame.moveRight_nim_hEq
noncomputable def toLeftMovesNim {o : Ordinal} : Set.Iio o ≃ (nim o).LeftMoves :=
(enumIsoOut o).toEquiv.trans (Equiv.cast (leftMoves_nim o).symm)
#align pgame.to_left_moves_nim SetTheory.PGame.toLeftMovesNim
noncomputable def toRightMovesNim {o : Ordinal} : Set.Iio o ≃ (nim o).RightMoves :=
(enumIsoOut o).toEquiv.trans (Equiv.cast (rightMoves_nim o).symm)
#align pgame.to_right_moves_nim SetTheory.PGame.toRightMovesNim
@[simp]
theorem toLeftMovesNim_symm_lt {o : Ordinal} (i : (nim o).LeftMoves) :
↑(toLeftMovesNim.symm i) < o :=
(toLeftMovesNim.symm i).prop
#align pgame.to_left_moves_nim_symm_lt SetTheory.PGame.toLeftMovesNim_symm_lt
@[simp]
theorem toRightMovesNim_symm_lt {o : Ordinal} (i : (nim o).RightMoves) :
↑(toRightMovesNim.symm i) < o :=
(toRightMovesNim.symm i).prop
#align pgame.to_right_moves_nim_symm_lt SetTheory.PGame.toRightMovesNim_symm_lt
@[simp]
theorem moveLeft_nim' {o : Ordinal.{u}} (i) :
(nim o).moveLeft i = nim (toLeftMovesNim.symm i).val :=
(congr_heq (moveLeft_nim_hEq o).symm (cast_heq _ i)).symm
#align pgame.move_left_nim' SetTheory.PGame.moveLeft_nim'
theorem moveLeft_nim {o : Ordinal} (i) : (nim o).moveLeft (toLeftMovesNim i) = nim i := by simp
#align pgame.move_left_nim SetTheory.PGame.moveLeft_nim
@[simp]
theorem moveRight_nim' {o : Ordinal} (i) : (nim o).moveRight i = nim (toRightMovesNim.symm i).val :=
(congr_heq (moveRight_nim_hEq o).symm (cast_heq _ i)).symm
#align pgame.move_right_nim' SetTheory.PGame.moveRight_nim'
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Game/Nim.lean | 119 | 119 | theorem moveRight_nim {o : Ordinal} (i) : (nim o).moveRight (toRightMovesNim i) = nim i := by | simp
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.LinearPMap
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.Basic
#align_import topology.algebra.module.linear_pmap from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
open Topology
variable {R E F : Type*}
variable [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup F]
variable [Module R E] [Module R F]
variable [TopologicalSpace E] [TopologicalSpace F]
namespace LinearPMap
def IsClosed (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : Prop :=
_root_.IsClosed (f.graph : Set (E × F))
#align linear_pmap.is_closed LinearPMap.IsClosed
variable [ContinuousAdd E] [ContinuousAdd F]
variable [TopologicalSpace R] [ContinuousSMul R E] [ContinuousSMul R F]
def IsClosable (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : Prop :=
∃ f' : LinearPMap R E F, f.graph.topologicalClosure = f'.graph
#align linear_pmap.is_closable LinearPMap.IsClosable
theorem IsClosed.isClosable {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hf : f.IsClosed) : f.IsClosable :=
⟨f, hf.submodule_topologicalClosure_eq⟩
#align linear_pmap.is_closed.is_closable LinearPMap.IsClosed.isClosable
theorem IsClosable.leIsClosable {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hf : f.IsClosable) (hfg : g ≤ f) :
g.IsClosable := by
cases' hf with f' hf
have : g.graph.topologicalClosure ≤ f'.graph := by
rw [← hf]
exact Submodule.topologicalClosure_mono (le_graph_of_le hfg)
use g.graph.topologicalClosure.toLinearPMap
rw [Submodule.toLinearPMap_graph_eq]
exact fun _ hx hx' => f'.graph_fst_eq_zero_snd (this hx) hx'
#align linear_pmap.is_closable.le_is_closable LinearPMap.IsClosable.leIsClosable
theorem IsClosable.existsUnique {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hf : f.IsClosable) :
∃! f' : E →ₗ.[R] F, f.graph.topologicalClosure = f'.graph := by
refine exists_unique_of_exists_of_unique hf fun _ _ hy₁ hy₂ => eq_of_eq_graph ?_
rw [← hy₁, ← hy₂]
#align linear_pmap.is_closable.exists_unique LinearPMap.IsClosable.existsUnique
open scoped Classical
noncomputable def closure (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : E →ₗ.[R] F :=
if hf : f.IsClosable then hf.choose else f
#align linear_pmap.closure LinearPMap.closure
theorem closure_def {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hf : f.IsClosable) : f.closure = hf.choose := by
simp [closure, hf]
#align linear_pmap.closure_def LinearPMap.closure_def
theorem closure_def' {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hf : ¬f.IsClosable) : f.closure = f := by simp [closure, hf]
#align linear_pmap.closure_def' LinearPMap.closure_def'
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Module/LinearPMap.lean | 112 | 115 | theorem IsClosable.graph_closure_eq_closure_graph {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hf : f.IsClosable) :
f.graph.topologicalClosure = f.closure.graph := by |
rw [closure_def hf]
exact hf.choose_spec
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Derivative
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Cast
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Vandermonde
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
#align_import data.polynomial.hasse_deriv from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a148d797a1094ab554ad4183a4ad6f130358ef64"
noncomputable section
namespace Polynomial
open Nat Polynomial
open Function
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] (k : ℕ) (f : R[X])
def hasseDeriv (k : ℕ) : R[X] →ₗ[R] R[X] :=
lsum fun i => monomial (i - k) ∘ₗ DistribMulAction.toLinearMap R R (i.choose k)
#align polynomial.hasse_deriv Polynomial.hasseDeriv
theorem hasseDeriv_apply :
hasseDeriv k f = f.sum fun i r => monomial (i - k) (↑(i.choose k) * r) := by
dsimp [hasseDeriv]
congr; ext; congr
apply nsmul_eq_mul
#align polynomial.hasse_deriv_apply Polynomial.hasseDeriv_apply
theorem hasseDeriv_coeff (n : ℕ) :
(hasseDeriv k f).coeff n = (n + k).choose k * f.coeff (n + k) := by
rw [hasseDeriv_apply, coeff_sum, sum_def, Finset.sum_eq_single (n + k), coeff_monomial]
· simp only [if_true, add_tsub_cancel_right, eq_self_iff_true]
· intro i _hi hink
rw [coeff_monomial]
by_cases hik : i < k
· simp only [Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt hik, ite_self, Nat.cast_zero, zero_mul]
· push_neg at hik
rw [if_neg]
contrapose! hink
exact (tsub_eq_iff_eq_add_of_le hik).mp hink
· intro h
simp only [not_mem_support_iff.mp h, monomial_zero_right, mul_zero, coeff_zero]
#align polynomial.hasse_deriv_coeff Polynomial.hasseDeriv_coeff
theorem hasseDeriv_zero' : hasseDeriv 0 f = f := by
simp only [hasseDeriv_apply, tsub_zero, Nat.choose_zero_right, Nat.cast_one, one_mul,
sum_monomial_eq]
#align polynomial.hasse_deriv_zero' Polynomial.hasseDeriv_zero'
@[simp]
theorem hasseDeriv_zero : @hasseDeriv R _ 0 = LinearMap.id :=
LinearMap.ext <| hasseDeriv_zero'
#align polynomial.hasse_deriv_zero Polynomial.hasseDeriv_zero
theorem hasseDeriv_eq_zero_of_lt_natDegree (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (h : p.natDegree < n) :
hasseDeriv n p = 0 := by
rw [hasseDeriv_apply, sum_def]
refine Finset.sum_eq_zero fun x hx => ?_
simp [Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt ((le_natDegree_of_mem_supp _ hx).trans_lt h)]
#align polynomial.hasse_deriv_eq_zero_of_lt_nat_degree Polynomial.hasseDeriv_eq_zero_of_lt_natDegree
theorem hasseDeriv_one' : hasseDeriv 1 f = derivative f := by
simp only [hasseDeriv_apply, derivative_apply, ← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, Nat.choose_one_right,
(Nat.cast_commute _ _).eq]
#align polynomial.hasse_deriv_one' Polynomial.hasseDeriv_one'
@[simp]
theorem hasseDeriv_one : @hasseDeriv R _ 1 = derivative :=
LinearMap.ext <| hasseDeriv_one'
#align polynomial.hasse_deriv_one Polynomial.hasseDeriv_one
@[simp]
theorem hasseDeriv_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) :
hasseDeriv k (monomial n r) = monomial (n - k) (↑(n.choose k) * r) := by
ext i
simp only [hasseDeriv_coeff, coeff_monomial]
by_cases hnik : n = i + k
· rw [if_pos hnik, if_pos, ← hnik]
apply tsub_eq_of_eq_add_rev
rwa [add_comm]
· rw [if_neg hnik, mul_zero]
by_cases hkn : k ≤ n
· rw [← tsub_eq_iff_eq_add_of_le hkn] at hnik
rw [if_neg hnik]
· push_neg at hkn
rw [Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt hkn, Nat.cast_zero, zero_mul, ite_self]
#align polynomial.hasse_deriv_monomial Polynomial.hasseDeriv_monomial
theorem hasseDeriv_C (r : R) (hk : 0 < k) : hasseDeriv k (C r) = 0 := by
rw [← monomial_zero_left, hasseDeriv_monomial, Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt hk, Nat.cast_zero,
zero_mul, monomial_zero_right]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.hasse_deriv_C Polynomial.hasseDeriv_C
theorem hasseDeriv_apply_one (hk : 0 < k) : hasseDeriv k (1 : R[X]) = 0 := by
rw [← C_1, hasseDeriv_C k _ hk]
#align polynomial.hasse_deriv_apply_one Polynomial.hasseDeriv_apply_one
theorem hasseDeriv_X (hk : 1 < k) : hasseDeriv k (X : R[X]) = 0 := by
rw [← monomial_one_one_eq_X, hasseDeriv_monomial, Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt hk, Nat.cast_zero,
zero_mul, monomial_zero_right]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.hasse_deriv_X Polynomial.hasseDeriv_X
theorem factorial_smul_hasseDeriv : ⇑(k ! • @hasseDeriv R _ k) = (@derivative R _)^[k] := by
induction' k with k ih
· rw [hasseDeriv_zero, factorial_zero, iterate_zero, one_smul, LinearMap.id_coe]
ext f n : 2
rw [iterate_succ_apply', ← ih]
simp only [LinearMap.smul_apply, coeff_smul, LinearMap.map_smul_of_tower, coeff_derivative,
hasseDeriv_coeff, ← @choose_symm_add _ k]
simp only [nsmul_eq_mul, factorial_succ, mul_assoc, succ_eq_add_one, ← add_assoc,
add_right_comm n 1 k, ← cast_succ]
rw [← (cast_commute (n + 1) (f.coeff (n + k + 1))).eq]
simp only [← mul_assoc]
norm_cast
congr 2
rw [mul_comm (k+1) _, mul_assoc, mul_assoc]
congr 1
have : n + k + 1 = n + (k + 1) := by apply add_assoc
rw [← choose_symm_of_eq_add this, choose_succ_right_eq, mul_comm]
congr
rw [add_assoc, add_tsub_cancel_left]
#align polynomial.factorial_smul_hasse_deriv Polynomial.factorial_smul_hasseDeriv
theorem hasseDeriv_comp (k l : ℕ) :
(@hasseDeriv R _ k).comp (hasseDeriv l) = (k + l).choose k • hasseDeriv (k + l) := by
ext i : 2
simp only [LinearMap.smul_apply, comp_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp, smul_monomial, hasseDeriv_apply,
mul_one, monomial_eq_zero_iff, sum_monomial_index, mul_zero, ←
tsub_add_eq_tsub_tsub, add_comm l k]
rw_mod_cast [nsmul_eq_mul]
rw [← Nat.cast_mul]
congr 2
by_cases hikl : i < k + l
· rw [choose_eq_zero_of_lt hikl, mul_zero]
by_cases hil : i < l
· rw [choose_eq_zero_of_lt hil, mul_zero]
· push_neg at hil
rw [← tsub_lt_iff_right hil] at hikl
rw [choose_eq_zero_of_lt hikl, zero_mul]
push_neg at hikl
apply @cast_injective ℚ
have h1 : l ≤ i := le_of_add_le_right hikl
have h2 : k ≤ i - l := le_tsub_of_add_le_right hikl
have h3 : k ≤ k + l := le_self_add
push_cast
rw [cast_choose ℚ h1, cast_choose ℚ h2, cast_choose ℚ h3, cast_choose ℚ hikl]
rw [show i - (k + l) = i - l - k by rw [add_comm]; apply tsub_add_eq_tsub_tsub]
simp only [add_tsub_cancel_left]
field_simp; ring
#align polynomial.hasse_deriv_comp Polynomial.hasseDeriv_comp
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/HasseDeriv.lean | 192 | 207 | theorem natDegree_hasseDeriv_le (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
natDegree (hasseDeriv n p) ≤ natDegree p - n := by |
classical
rw [hasseDeriv_apply, sum_def]
refine (natDegree_sum_le _ _).trans ?_
simp_rw [Function.comp, natDegree_monomial]
rw [Finset.fold_ite, Finset.fold_const]
· simp only [ite_self, max_eq_right, zero_le', Finset.fold_max_le, true_and_iff, and_imp,
tsub_le_iff_right, mem_support_iff, Ne, Finset.mem_filter]
intro x hx hx'
have hxp : x ≤ p.natDegree := le_natDegree_of_ne_zero hx
have hxn : n ≤ x := by
contrapose! hx'
simp [Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt hx']
rwa [tsub_add_cancel_of_le (hxn.trans hxp)]
· simp
|
import Mathlib.Logic.Relation
import Mathlib.Data.List.Forall2
import Mathlib.Data.List.Lex
import Mathlib.Data.List.Infix
#align_import data.list.chain from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"dd71334db81d0bd444af1ee339a29298bef40734"
-- Make sure we haven't imported `Data.Nat.Order.Basic`
assert_not_exists OrderedSub
universe u v
open Nat
namespace List
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {R r : α → α → Prop} {l l₁ l₂ : List α} {a b : α}
mk_iff_of_inductive_prop List.Chain List.chain_iff
#align list.chain_iff List.chain_iff
#align list.chain.nil List.Chain.nil
#align list.chain.cons List.Chain.cons
#align list.rel_of_chain_cons List.rel_of_chain_cons
#align list.chain_of_chain_cons List.chain_of_chain_cons
#align list.chain.imp' List.Chain.imp'
#align list.chain.imp List.Chain.imp
theorem Chain.iff {S : α → α → Prop} (H : ∀ a b, R a b ↔ S a b) {a : α} {l : List α} :
Chain R a l ↔ Chain S a l :=
⟨Chain.imp fun a b => (H a b).1, Chain.imp fun a b => (H a b).2⟩
#align list.chain.iff List.Chain.iff
theorem Chain.iff_mem {a : α} {l : List α} :
Chain R a l ↔ Chain (fun x y => x ∈ a :: l ∧ y ∈ l ∧ R x y) a l :=
⟨fun p => by
induction' p with _ a b l r _ IH <;> constructor <;>
[exact ⟨mem_cons_self _ _, mem_cons_self _ _, r⟩;
exact IH.imp fun a b ⟨am, bm, h⟩ => ⟨mem_cons_of_mem _ am, mem_cons_of_mem _ bm, h⟩],
Chain.imp fun a b h => h.2.2⟩
#align list.chain.iff_mem List.Chain.iff_mem
| Mathlib/Data/List/Chain.lean | 58 | 59 | theorem chain_singleton {a b : α} : Chain R a [b] ↔ R a b := by |
simp only [chain_cons, Chain.nil, and_true_iff]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Hom.Instances
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Function
import Mathlib.Logic.Pairwise
#align_import algebra.group.pi from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e4bc74cbaf429d706cb9140902f7ca6c431e75a4"
assert_not_exists AddMonoidWithOne
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
universe u v w
variable {ι α : Type*}
variable {I : Type u}
-- The indexing type
variable {f : I → Type v}
-- The family of types already equipped with instances
variable (x y : ∀ i, f i) (i j : I)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Set.range_one {α β : Type*} [One β] [Nonempty α] : Set.range (1 : α → β) = {1} :=
range_const
@[to_additive]
theorem Set.preimage_one {α β : Type*} [One β] (s : Set β) [Decidable ((1 : β) ∈ s)] :
(1 : α → β) ⁻¹' s = if (1 : β) ∈ s then Set.univ else ∅ :=
Set.preimage_const 1 s
#align set.preimage_one Set.preimage_one
#align set.preimage_zero Set.preimage_zero
namespace MulHom
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_mul {M N} {_ : Mul M} {_ : CommSemigroup N} (f g : M →ₙ* N) : (f * g : M → N) =
fun x => f x * g x := rfl
#align mul_hom.coe_mul MulHom.coe_mul
#align add_hom.coe_add AddHom.coe_add
end MulHom
section Single
variable [DecidableEq I]
open Pi
variable (f)
@[to_additive
"The zero-preserving homomorphism including a single value into a dependent family of values,
as functions supported at a point.
This is the `ZeroHom` version of `Pi.single`."]
nonrec def OneHom.mulSingle [∀ i, One <| f i] (i : I) : OneHom (f i) (∀ i, f i) where
toFun := mulSingle i
map_one' := mulSingle_one i
#align one_hom.single OneHom.mulSingle
#align zero_hom.single ZeroHom.single
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem OneHom.mulSingle_apply [∀ i, One <| f i] (i : I) (x : f i) :
mulSingle f i x = Pi.mulSingle i x := rfl
#align one_hom.single_apply OneHom.mulSingle_apply
#align zero_hom.single_apply ZeroHom.single_apply
@[to_additive
"The additive monoid homomorphism including a single additive monoid into a dependent family
of additive monoids, as functions supported at a point.
This is the `AddMonoidHom` version of `Pi.single`."]
def MonoidHom.mulSingle [∀ i, MulOneClass <| f i] (i : I) : f i →* ∀ i, f i :=
{ OneHom.mulSingle f i with map_mul' := mulSingle_op₂ (fun _ => (· * ·)) (fun _ => one_mul _) _ }
#align monoid_hom.single MonoidHom.mulSingle
#align add_monoid_hom.single AddMonoidHom.single
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MonoidHom.mulSingle_apply [∀ i, MulOneClass <| f i] (i : I) (x : f i) :
mulSingle f i x = Pi.mulSingle i x :=
rfl
#align monoid_hom.single_apply MonoidHom.mulSingle_apply
#align add_monoid_hom.single_apply AddMonoidHom.single_apply
variable {f}
@[to_additive]
theorem Pi.mulSingle_sup [∀ i, SemilatticeSup (f i)] [∀ i, One (f i)] (i : I) (x y : f i) :
Pi.mulSingle i (x ⊔ y) = Pi.mulSingle i x ⊔ Pi.mulSingle i y :=
Function.update_sup _ _ _ _
#align pi.mul_single_sup Pi.mulSingle_sup
#align pi.single_sup Pi.single_sup
@[to_additive]
theorem Pi.mulSingle_inf [∀ i, SemilatticeInf (f i)] [∀ i, One (f i)] (i : I) (x y : f i) :
Pi.mulSingle i (x ⊓ y) = Pi.mulSingle i x ⊓ Pi.mulSingle i y :=
Function.update_inf _ _ _ _
#align pi.mul_single_inf Pi.mulSingle_inf
#align pi.single_inf Pi.single_inf
@[to_additive]
theorem Pi.mulSingle_mul [∀ i, MulOneClass <| f i] (i : I) (x y : f i) :
mulSingle i (x * y) = mulSingle i x * mulSingle i y :=
(MonoidHom.mulSingle f i).map_mul x y
#align pi.mul_single_mul Pi.mulSingle_mul
#align pi.single_add Pi.single_add
@[to_additive]
theorem Pi.mulSingle_inv [∀ i, Group <| f i] (i : I) (x : f i) :
mulSingle i x⁻¹ = (mulSingle i x)⁻¹ :=
(MonoidHom.mulSingle f i).map_inv x
#align pi.mul_single_inv Pi.mulSingle_inv
#align pi.single_neg Pi.single_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem Pi.mulSingle_div [∀ i, Group <| f i] (i : I) (x y : f i) :
mulSingle i (x / y) = mulSingle i x / mulSingle i y :=
(MonoidHom.mulSingle f i).map_div x y
#align pi.single_div Pi.mulSingle_div
#align pi.single_sub Pi.single_sub
section
variable [∀ i, Mul <| f i]
@[to_additive]
theorem SemiconjBy.pi {x y z : ∀ i, f i} (h : ∀ i, SemiconjBy (x i) (y i) (z i)) :
SemiconjBy x y z :=
funext h
@[to_additive]
theorem Pi.semiconjBy_iff {x y z : ∀ i, f i} :
SemiconjBy x y z ↔ ∀ i, SemiconjBy (x i) (y i) (z i) := Function.funext_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem Commute.pi {x y : ∀ i, f i} (h : ∀ i, Commute (x i) (y i)) : Commute x y := .pi h
@[to_additive]
theorem Pi.commute_iff {x y : ∀ i, f i} : Commute x y ↔ ∀ i, Commute (x i) (y i) := semiconjBy_iff
end
@[to_additive
"The injection into an additive pi group at different indices commutes.
For injections of commuting elements at the same index, see `AddCommute.map`"]
theorem Pi.mulSingle_commute [∀ i, MulOneClass <| f i] :
Pairwise fun i j => ∀ (x : f i) (y : f j), Commute (mulSingle i x) (mulSingle j y) := by
intro i j hij x y; ext k
by_cases h1 : i = k;
· subst h1
simp [hij]
by_cases h2 : j = k;
· subst h2
simp [hij]
simp [h1, h2]
#align pi.mul_single_commute Pi.mulSingle_commute
#align pi.single_commute Pi.single_addCommute
@[to_additive "The injection into an additive pi group with the same values commutes."]
theorem Pi.mulSingle_apply_commute [∀ i, MulOneClass <| f i] (x : ∀ i, f i) (i j : I) :
Commute (mulSingle i (x i)) (mulSingle j (x j)) := by
obtain rfl | hij := Decidable.eq_or_ne i j
· rfl
· exact Pi.mulSingle_commute hij _ _
#align pi.mul_single_apply_commute Pi.mulSingle_apply_commute
#align pi.single_apply_commute Pi.single_apply_addCommute
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Pi/Lemmas.lean | 359 | 364 | theorem Pi.update_eq_div_mul_mulSingle [∀ i, Group <| f i] (g : ∀ i : I, f i) (x : f i) :
Function.update g i x = g / mulSingle i (g i) * mulSingle i x := by |
ext j
rcases eq_or_ne i j with (rfl | h)
· simp
· simp [Function.update_noteq h.symm, h]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.unoriented.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"46b633fd842bef9469441c0209906f6dddd2b4f5"
assert_not_exists HasFDerivAt
assert_not_exists ConformalAt
noncomputable section
open Real Set
open Real
open RealInnerProductSpace
namespace InnerProductGeometry
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] {x y : V}
def angle (x y : V) : ℝ :=
Real.arccos (⟪x, y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖))
#align inner_product_geometry.angle InnerProductGeometry.angle
theorem continuousAt_angle {x : V × V} (hx1 : x.1 ≠ 0) (hx2 : x.2 ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : V × V => angle y.1 y.2) x :=
Real.continuous_arccos.continuousAt.comp <|
continuous_inner.continuousAt.div
((continuous_norm.comp continuous_fst).mul (continuous_norm.comp continuous_snd)).continuousAt
(by simp [hx1, hx2])
#align inner_product_geometry.continuous_at_angle InnerProductGeometry.continuousAt_angle
theorem angle_smul_smul {c : ℝ} (hc : c ≠ 0) (x y : V) : angle (c • x) (c • y) = angle x y := by
have : c * c ≠ 0 := mul_ne_zero hc hc
rw [angle, angle, real_inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, norm_smul, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs,
mul_mul_mul_comm _ ‖x‖, abs_mul_abs_self, ← mul_assoc c c, mul_div_mul_left _ _ this]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_smul_smul InnerProductGeometry.angle_smul_smul
@[simp]
theorem _root_.LinearIsometry.angle_map {E F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[InnerProductSpace ℝ E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F] (f : E →ₗᵢ[ℝ] F) (u v : E) :
angle (f u) (f v) = angle u v := by
rw [angle, angle, f.inner_map_map, f.norm_map, f.norm_map]
#align linear_isometry.angle_map LinearIsometry.angle_map
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem _root_.Submodule.angle_coe {s : Submodule ℝ V} (x y : s) :
angle (x : V) (y : V) = angle x y :=
s.subtypeₗᵢ.angle_map x y
#align submodule.angle_coe Submodule.angle_coe
theorem cos_angle (x y : V) : Real.cos (angle x y) = ⟪x, y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) :=
Real.cos_arccos (abs_le.mp (abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one x y)).1
(abs_le.mp (abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one x y)).2
#align inner_product_geometry.cos_angle InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle
theorem angle_comm (x y : V) : angle x y = angle y x := by
unfold angle
rw [real_inner_comm, mul_comm]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_comm InnerProductGeometry.angle_comm
@[simp]
theorem angle_neg_neg (x y : V) : angle (-x) (-y) = angle x y := by
unfold angle
rw [inner_neg_neg, norm_neg, norm_neg]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_neg_neg InnerProductGeometry.angle_neg_neg
theorem angle_nonneg (x y : V) : 0 ≤ angle x y :=
Real.arccos_nonneg _
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_nonneg InnerProductGeometry.angle_nonneg
theorem angle_le_pi (x y : V) : angle x y ≤ π :=
Real.arccos_le_pi _
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_le_pi InnerProductGeometry.angle_le_pi
theorem angle_neg_right (x y : V) : angle x (-y) = π - angle x y := by
unfold angle
rw [← Real.arccos_neg, norm_neg, inner_neg_right, neg_div]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_neg_right InnerProductGeometry.angle_neg_right
theorem angle_neg_left (x y : V) : angle (-x) y = π - angle x y := by
rw [← angle_neg_neg, neg_neg, angle_neg_right]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_neg_left InnerProductGeometry.angle_neg_left
proof_wanted angle_triangle (x y z : V) : angle x z ≤ angle x y + angle y z
@[simp]
theorem angle_zero_left (x : V) : angle 0 x = π / 2 := by
unfold angle
rw [inner_zero_left, zero_div, Real.arccos_zero]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_zero_left InnerProductGeometry.angle_zero_left
@[simp]
theorem angle_zero_right (x : V) : angle x 0 = π / 2 := by
unfold angle
rw [inner_zero_right, zero_div, Real.arccos_zero]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_zero_right InnerProductGeometry.angle_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem angle_self {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : angle x x = 0 := by
unfold angle
rw [← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, div_self (inner_self_ne_zero.2 hx : ⟪x, x⟫ ≠ 0),
Real.arccos_one]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_self InnerProductGeometry.angle_self
@[simp]
theorem angle_self_neg_of_nonzero {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : angle x (-x) = π := by
rw [angle_neg_right, angle_self hx, sub_zero]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_self_neg_of_nonzero InnerProductGeometry.angle_self_neg_of_nonzero
@[simp]
theorem angle_neg_self_of_nonzero {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : angle (-x) x = π := by
rw [angle_comm, angle_self_neg_of_nonzero hx]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_neg_self_of_nonzero InnerProductGeometry.angle_neg_self_of_nonzero
@[simp]
theorem angle_smul_right_of_pos (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : angle x (r • y) = angle x y := by
unfold angle
rw [inner_smul_right, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hr), ← mul_assoc,
mul_comm _ r, mul_assoc, mul_div_mul_left _ _ (ne_of_gt hr)]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_smul_right_of_pos InnerProductGeometry.angle_smul_right_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem angle_smul_left_of_pos (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : angle (r • x) y = angle x y := by
rw [angle_comm, angle_smul_right_of_pos y x hr, angle_comm]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_smul_left_of_pos InnerProductGeometry.angle_smul_left_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem angle_smul_right_of_neg (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
angle x (r • y) = angle x (-y) := by
rw [← neg_neg r, neg_smul, angle_neg_right, angle_smul_right_of_pos x y (neg_pos_of_neg hr),
angle_neg_right]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_smul_right_of_neg InnerProductGeometry.angle_smul_right_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem angle_smul_left_of_neg (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) : angle (r • x) y = angle (-x) y := by
rw [angle_comm, angle_smul_right_of_neg y x hr, angle_comm]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_smul_left_of_neg InnerProductGeometry.angle_smul_left_of_neg
theorem cos_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm (x y : V) : Real.cos (angle x y) * (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) = ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [cos_angle, div_mul_cancel_of_imp]
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [or_imp]
#align inner_product_geometry.cos_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm
theorem sin_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm (x y : V) :
Real.sin (angle x y) * (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) = √(⟪x, x⟫ * ⟪y, y⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪x, y⟫) := by
unfold angle
rw [Real.sin_arccos, ← Real.sqrt_mul_self (mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg x) (norm_nonneg y)),
← Real.sqrt_mul' _ (mul_self_nonneg _), sq,
Real.sqrt_mul_self (mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg x) (norm_nonneg y)),
real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
by_cases h : ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ = 0
· rw [show ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ * (‖y‖ * ‖y‖) = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ * (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) by ring, h, mul_zero,
mul_zero, zero_sub]
cases' eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero h with hx hy
· rw [norm_eq_zero] at hx
rw [hx, inner_zero_left, zero_mul, neg_zero]
· rw [norm_eq_zero] at hy
rw [hy, inner_zero_right, zero_mul, neg_zero]
· field_simp [h]
ring_nf
#align inner_product_geometry.sin_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm InnerProductGeometry.sin_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm
theorem angle_eq_zero_iff {x y : V} : angle x y = 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, 0 < r ∧ y = r • x := by
rw [angle, ← real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff, Real.arccos_eq_zero, LE.le.le_iff_eq,
eq_comm]
exact (abs_le.mp (abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one x y)).2
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_eq_zero_iff InnerProductGeometry.angle_eq_zero_iff
theorem angle_eq_pi_iff {x y : V} : angle x y = π ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, r < 0 ∧ y = r • x := by
rw [angle, ← real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_iff, Real.arccos_eq_pi, LE.le.le_iff_eq]
exact (abs_le.mp (abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one x y)).1
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_eq_pi_iff InnerProductGeometry.angle_eq_pi_iff
theorem angle_add_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi {x y : V} (z : V) (h : angle x y = π) :
angle x z + angle y z = π := by
rcases angle_eq_pi_iff.1 h with ⟨_, ⟨r, ⟨hr, rfl⟩⟩⟩
rw [angle_smul_left_of_neg x z hr, angle_neg_left, add_sub_cancel]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_add_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi
theorem inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two (x y : V) : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0 ↔ angle x y = π / 2 :=
Iff.symm <| by simp (config := { contextual := true }) [angle, or_imp]
#align inner_product_geometry.inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two InnerProductGeometry.inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem inner_eq_neg_mul_norm_of_angle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : angle x y = π) :
⟪x, y⟫ = -(‖x‖ * ‖y‖) := by
simp [← cos_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm, h]
#align inner_product_geometry.inner_eq_neg_mul_norm_of_angle_eq_pi InnerProductGeometry.inner_eq_neg_mul_norm_of_angle_eq_pi
theorem inner_eq_mul_norm_of_angle_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : angle x y = 0) : ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by
simp [← cos_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm, h]
#align inner_product_geometry.inner_eq_mul_norm_of_angle_eq_zero InnerProductGeometry.inner_eq_mul_norm_of_angle_eq_zero
theorem inner_eq_neg_mul_norm_iff_angle_eq_pi {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
⟪x, y⟫ = -(‖x‖ * ‖y‖) ↔ angle x y = π := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, inner_eq_neg_mul_norm_of_angle_eq_pi⟩
have h₁ : ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ≠ 0 := (mul_pos (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx) (norm_pos_iff.mpr hy)).ne'
rw [angle, h, neg_div, div_self h₁, Real.arccos_neg_one]
#align inner_product_geometry.inner_eq_neg_mul_norm_iff_angle_eq_pi InnerProductGeometry.inner_eq_neg_mul_norm_iff_angle_eq_pi
theorem inner_eq_mul_norm_iff_angle_eq_zero {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ angle x y = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, inner_eq_mul_norm_of_angle_eq_zero⟩
have h₁ : ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ≠ 0 := (mul_pos (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx) (norm_pos_iff.mpr hy)).ne'
rw [angle, h, div_self h₁, Real.arccos_one]
#align inner_product_geometry.inner_eq_mul_norm_iff_angle_eq_zero InnerProductGeometry.inner_eq_mul_norm_iff_angle_eq_zero
theorem norm_sub_eq_add_norm_of_angle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : angle x y = π) :
‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ := by
rw [← sq_eq_sq (norm_nonneg (x - y)) (add_nonneg (norm_nonneg x) (norm_nonneg y)),
norm_sub_pow_two_real, inner_eq_neg_mul_norm_of_angle_eq_pi h]
ring
#align inner_product_geometry.norm_sub_eq_add_norm_of_angle_eq_pi InnerProductGeometry.norm_sub_eq_add_norm_of_angle_eq_pi
theorem norm_add_eq_add_norm_of_angle_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : angle x y = 0) :
‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ := by
rw [← sq_eq_sq (norm_nonneg (x + y)) (add_nonneg (norm_nonneg x) (norm_nonneg y)),
norm_add_pow_two_real, inner_eq_mul_norm_of_angle_eq_zero h]
ring
#align inner_product_geometry.norm_add_eq_add_norm_of_angle_eq_zero InnerProductGeometry.norm_add_eq_add_norm_of_angle_eq_zero
theorem norm_sub_eq_abs_sub_norm_of_angle_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : angle x y = 0) :
‖x - y‖ = |‖x‖ - ‖y‖| := by
rw [← sq_eq_sq (norm_nonneg (x - y)) (abs_nonneg (‖x‖ - ‖y‖)), norm_sub_pow_two_real,
inner_eq_mul_norm_of_angle_eq_zero h, sq_abs (‖x‖ - ‖y‖)]
ring
#align inner_product_geometry.norm_sub_eq_abs_sub_norm_of_angle_eq_zero InnerProductGeometry.norm_sub_eq_abs_sub_norm_of_angle_eq_zero
theorem norm_sub_eq_add_norm_iff_angle_eq_pi {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ ↔ angle x y = π := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, norm_sub_eq_add_norm_of_angle_eq_pi⟩
rw [← inner_eq_neg_mul_norm_iff_angle_eq_pi hx hy]
obtain ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ := norm_nonneg (x - y), add_nonneg (norm_nonneg x) (norm_nonneg y)
rw [← sq_eq_sq hxy₁ hxy₂, norm_sub_pow_two_real] at h
calc
⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ ^ 2 + ‖y‖ ^ 2 - (‖x‖ + ‖y‖) ^ 2) / 2 := by linarith
_ = -(‖x‖ * ‖y‖) := by ring
#align inner_product_geometry.norm_sub_eq_add_norm_iff_angle_eq_pi InnerProductGeometry.norm_sub_eq_add_norm_iff_angle_eq_pi
theorem norm_add_eq_add_norm_iff_angle_eq_zero {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ ↔ angle x y = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, norm_add_eq_add_norm_of_angle_eq_zero⟩
rw [← inner_eq_mul_norm_iff_angle_eq_zero hx hy]
obtain ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ := norm_nonneg (x + y), add_nonneg (norm_nonneg x) (norm_nonneg y)
rw [← sq_eq_sq hxy₁ hxy₂, norm_add_pow_two_real] at h
calc
⟪x, y⟫ = ((‖x‖ + ‖y‖) ^ 2 - ‖x‖ ^ 2 - ‖y‖ ^ 2) / 2 := by linarith
_ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by ring
#align inner_product_geometry.norm_add_eq_add_norm_iff_angle_eq_zero InnerProductGeometry.norm_add_eq_add_norm_iff_angle_eq_zero
theorem norm_sub_eq_abs_sub_norm_iff_angle_eq_zero {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
‖x - y‖ = |‖x‖ - ‖y‖| ↔ angle x y = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, norm_sub_eq_abs_sub_norm_of_angle_eq_zero⟩
rw [← inner_eq_mul_norm_iff_angle_eq_zero hx hy]
have h1 : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = (‖x‖ - ‖y‖) ^ 2 := by
rw [h]
exact sq_abs (‖x‖ - ‖y‖)
rw [norm_sub_pow_two_real] at h1
calc
⟪x, y⟫ = ((‖x‖ + ‖y‖) ^ 2 - ‖x‖ ^ 2 - ‖y‖ ^ 2) / 2 := by linarith
_ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by ring
#align inner_product_geometry.norm_sub_eq_abs_sub_norm_iff_angle_eq_zero InnerProductGeometry.norm_sub_eq_abs_sub_norm_iff_angle_eq_zero
theorem norm_add_eq_norm_sub_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two (x y : V) :
‖x + y‖ = ‖x - y‖ ↔ angle x y = π / 2 := by
rw [← sq_eq_sq (norm_nonneg (x + y)) (norm_nonneg (x - y)),
← inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two x y, norm_add_pow_two_real, norm_sub_pow_two_real]
constructor <;> intro h <;> linarith
#align inner_product_geometry.norm_add_eq_norm_sub_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two InnerProductGeometry.norm_add_eq_norm_sub_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem cos_eq_one_iff_angle_eq_zero : cos (angle x y) = 1 ↔ angle x y = 0 := by
rw [← cos_zero]
exact injOn_cos.eq_iff ⟨angle_nonneg x y, angle_le_pi x y⟩ (left_mem_Icc.2 pi_pos.le)
#align inner_product_geometry.cos_eq_one_iff_angle_eq_zero InnerProductGeometry.cos_eq_one_iff_angle_eq_zero
theorem cos_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two : cos (angle x y) = 0 ↔ angle x y = π / 2 := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two]
apply injOn_cos.eq_iff ⟨angle_nonneg x y, angle_le_pi x y⟩
constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
#align inner_product_geometry.cos_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two InnerProductGeometry.cos_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem cos_eq_neg_one_iff_angle_eq_pi : cos (angle x y) = -1 ↔ angle x y = π := by
rw [← cos_pi]
exact injOn_cos.eq_iff ⟨angle_nonneg x y, angle_le_pi x y⟩ (right_mem_Icc.2 pi_pos.le)
#align inner_product_geometry.cos_eq_neg_one_iff_angle_eq_pi InnerProductGeometry.cos_eq_neg_one_iff_angle_eq_pi
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Unoriented/Basic.lean | 365 | 367 | theorem sin_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero_or_angle_eq_pi :
sin (angle x y) = 0 ↔ angle x y = 0 ∨ angle x y = π := by |
rw [sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq, cos_eq_one_iff_angle_eq_zero, cos_eq_neg_one_iff_angle_eq_pi]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
namespace Finset
variable {R M : Type*} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (f : ℕ → R) (g : ℕ → M) {m n : ℕ}
-- The partial sum of `g`, starting from zero
local notation "G " n:80 => ∑ i ∈ range n, g i
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Module.lean | 21 | 57 | theorem sum_Ico_by_parts (hmn : m < n) :
∑ i ∈ Ico m n, f i • g i =
f (n - 1) • G n - f m • G m - ∑ i ∈ Ico m (n - 1), (f (i + 1) - f i) • G (i + 1) := by |
have h₁ : (∑ i ∈ Ico (m + 1) n, f i • G i) = ∑ i ∈ Ico m (n - 1), f (i + 1) • G (i + 1) := by
rw [← Nat.sub_add_cancel (Nat.one_le_of_lt hmn), ← sum_Ico_add']
simp only [ge_iff_le, tsub_le_iff_right, add_le_iff_nonpos_left, nonpos_iff_eq_zero,
tsub_eq_zero_iff_le, add_tsub_cancel_right]
have h₂ :
(∑ i ∈ Ico (m + 1) n, f i • G (i + 1)) =
(∑ i ∈ Ico m (n - 1), f i • G (i + 1)) + f (n - 1) • G n - f m • G (m + 1) := by
rw [← sum_Ico_sub_bot _ hmn, ← sum_Ico_succ_sub_top _ (Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt hmn),
Nat.sub_add_cancel (pos_of_gt hmn), sub_add_cancel]
rw [sum_eq_sum_Ico_succ_bot hmn]
-- Porting note: the following used to be done with `conv`
have h₃: (Finset.sum (Ico (m + 1) n) fun i => f i • g i) =
(Finset.sum (Ico (m + 1) n) fun i =>
f i • ((Finset.sum (Finset.range (i + 1)) g) -
(Finset.sum (Finset.range i) g))) := by
congr; funext; rw [← sum_range_succ_sub_sum g]
rw [h₃]
simp_rw [smul_sub, sum_sub_distrib, h₂, h₁]
-- Porting note: the following used to be done with `conv`
have h₄ : ((((Finset.sum (Ico m (n - 1)) fun i => f i • Finset.sum (range (i + 1)) fun i => g i) +
f (n - 1) • Finset.sum (range n) fun i => g i) -
f m • Finset.sum (range (m + 1)) fun i => g i) -
Finset.sum (Ico m (n - 1)) fun i => f (i + 1) • Finset.sum (range (i + 1)) fun i => g i) =
f (n - 1) • (range n).sum g - f m • (range (m + 1)).sum g +
Finset.sum (Ico m (n - 1)) (fun i => f i • (range (i + 1)).sum g -
f (i + 1) • (range (i + 1)).sum g) := by
rw [← add_sub, add_comm, ← add_sub, ← sum_sub_distrib]
rw [h₄]
have : ∀ i, f i • G (i + 1) - f (i + 1) • G (i + 1) = -((f (i + 1) - f i) • G (i + 1)) := by
intro i
rw [sub_smul]
abel
simp_rw [this, sum_neg_distrib, sum_range_succ, smul_add]
abel
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Aut
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
#align_import group_theory.semidirect_product from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f7fc89d5d5ff1db2d1242c7bb0e9062ce47ef47c"
variable (N : Type*) (G : Type*) {H : Type*} [Group N] [Group G] [Group H]
@[ext]
structure SemidirectProduct (φ : G →* MulAut N) where
left : N
right : G
deriving DecidableEq
#align semidirect_product SemidirectProduct
-- Porting note: these lemmas are autogenerated by the inductive definition and are not
-- in simple form due to the existence of mk_eq_inl_mul_inr
attribute [nolint simpNF] SemidirectProduct.mk.injEq
attribute [nolint simpNF] SemidirectProduct.mk.sizeOf_spec
-- Porting note: unknown attribute
-- attribute [pp_using_anonymous_constructor] SemidirectProduct
@[inherit_doc]
notation:35 N " ⋊[" φ:35 "] " G:35 => SemidirectProduct N G φ
namespace SemidirectProduct
variable {N G}
variable {φ : G →* MulAut N}
instance : Mul (SemidirectProduct N G φ) where
mul a b := ⟨a.1 * φ a.2 b.1, a.2 * b.2⟩
lemma mul_def (a b : SemidirectProduct N G φ) : a * b = ⟨a.1 * φ a.2 b.1, a.2 * b.2⟩ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_left (a b : N ⋊[φ] G) : (a * b).left = a.left * φ a.right b.left := rfl
#align semidirect_product.mul_left SemidirectProduct.mul_left
@[simp]
theorem mul_right (a b : N ⋊[φ] G) : (a * b).right = a.right * b.right := rfl
#align semidirect_product.mul_right SemidirectProduct.mul_right
instance : One (SemidirectProduct N G φ) where one := ⟨1, 1⟩
@[simp]
theorem one_left : (1 : N ⋊[φ] G).left = 1 := rfl
#align semidirect_product.one_left SemidirectProduct.one_left
@[simp]
theorem one_right : (1 : N ⋊[φ] G).right = 1 := rfl
#align semidirect_product.one_right SemidirectProduct.one_right
instance : Inv (SemidirectProduct N G φ) where
inv x := ⟨φ x.2⁻¹ x.1⁻¹, x.2⁻¹⟩
@[simp]
theorem inv_left (a : N ⋊[φ] G) : a⁻¹.left = φ a.right⁻¹ a.left⁻¹ := rfl
#align semidirect_product.inv_left SemidirectProduct.inv_left
@[simp]
theorem inv_right (a : N ⋊[φ] G) : a⁻¹.right = a.right⁻¹ := rfl
#align semidirect_product.inv_right SemidirectProduct.inv_right
instance : Group (N ⋊[φ] G) where
mul_assoc a b c := SemidirectProduct.ext _ _ (by simp [mul_assoc]) (by simp [mul_assoc])
one_mul a := SemidirectProduct.ext _ _ (by simp) (one_mul a.2)
mul_one a := SemidirectProduct.ext _ _ (by simp) (mul_one _)
mul_left_inv a := SemidirectProduct.ext _ _ (by simp) (by simp)
instance : Inhabited (N ⋊[φ] G) := ⟨1⟩
def inl : N →* N ⋊[φ] G where
toFun n := ⟨n, 1⟩
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := by intros; ext <;>
simp only [mul_left, map_one, MulAut.one_apply, mul_right, mul_one]
#align semidirect_product.inl SemidirectProduct.inl
@[simp]
theorem left_inl (n : N) : (inl n : N ⋊[φ] G).left = n := rfl
#align semidirect_product.left_inl SemidirectProduct.left_inl
@[simp]
theorem right_inl (n : N) : (inl n : N ⋊[φ] G).right = 1 := rfl
#align semidirect_product.right_inl SemidirectProduct.right_inl
theorem inl_injective : Function.Injective (inl : N → N ⋊[φ] G) :=
Function.injective_iff_hasLeftInverse.2 ⟨left, left_inl⟩
#align semidirect_product.inl_injective SemidirectProduct.inl_injective
@[simp]
theorem inl_inj {n₁ n₂ : N} : (inl n₁ : N ⋊[φ] G) = inl n₂ ↔ n₁ = n₂ :=
inl_injective.eq_iff
#align semidirect_product.inl_inj SemidirectProduct.inl_inj
def inr : G →* N ⋊[φ] G where
toFun g := ⟨1, g⟩
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := by intros; ext <;> simp
#align semidirect_product.inr SemidirectProduct.inr
@[simp]
theorem left_inr (g : G) : (inr g : N ⋊[φ] G).left = 1 := rfl
#align semidirect_product.left_inr SemidirectProduct.left_inr
@[simp]
theorem right_inr (g : G) : (inr g : N ⋊[φ] G).right = g := rfl
#align semidirect_product.right_inr SemidirectProduct.right_inr
theorem inr_injective : Function.Injective (inr : G → N ⋊[φ] G) :=
Function.injective_iff_hasLeftInverse.2 ⟨right, right_inr⟩
#align semidirect_product.inr_injective SemidirectProduct.inr_injective
@[simp]
theorem inr_inj {g₁ g₂ : G} : (inr g₁ : N ⋊[φ] G) = inr g₂ ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
inr_injective.eq_iff
#align semidirect_product.inr_inj SemidirectProduct.inr_inj
theorem inl_aut (g : G) (n : N) : (inl (φ g n) : N ⋊[φ] G) = inr g * inl n * inr g⁻¹ := by
ext <;> simp
#align semidirect_product.inl_aut SemidirectProduct.inl_aut
theorem inl_aut_inv (g : G) (n : N) : (inl ((φ g)⁻¹ n) : N ⋊[φ] G) = inr g⁻¹ * inl n * inr g := by
rw [← MonoidHom.map_inv, inl_aut, inv_inv]
#align semidirect_product.inl_aut_inv SemidirectProduct.inl_aut_inv
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_inl_mul_inr (g : G) (n : N) : (⟨n, g⟩ : N ⋊[φ] G) = inl n * inr g := by ext <;> simp
#align semidirect_product.mk_eq_inl_mul_inr SemidirectProduct.mk_eq_inl_mul_inr
@[simp]
theorem inl_left_mul_inr_right (x : N ⋊[φ] G) : inl x.left * inr x.right = x := by ext <;> simp
#align semidirect_product.inl_left_mul_inr_right SemidirectProduct.inl_left_mul_inr_right
def rightHom : N ⋊[φ] G →* G where
toFun := SemidirectProduct.right
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
#align semidirect_product.right_hom SemidirectProduct.rightHom
@[simp]
theorem rightHom_eq_right : (rightHom : N ⋊[φ] G → G) = right := rfl
#align semidirect_product.right_hom_eq_right SemidirectProduct.rightHom_eq_right
@[simp]
theorem rightHom_comp_inl : (rightHom : N ⋊[φ] G →* G).comp inl = 1 := by ext; simp [rightHom]
#align semidirect_product.right_hom_comp_inl SemidirectProduct.rightHom_comp_inl
@[simp]
theorem rightHom_comp_inr : (rightHom : N ⋊[φ] G →* G).comp inr = MonoidHom.id _ := by
ext; simp [rightHom]
#align semidirect_product.right_hom_comp_inr SemidirectProduct.rightHom_comp_inr
@[simp]
theorem rightHom_inl (n : N) : rightHom (inl n : N ⋊[φ] G) = 1 := by simp [rightHom]
#align semidirect_product.right_hom_inl SemidirectProduct.rightHom_inl
@[simp]
theorem rightHom_inr (g : G) : rightHom (inr g : N ⋊[φ] G) = g := by simp [rightHom]
#align semidirect_product.right_hom_inr SemidirectProduct.rightHom_inr
theorem rightHom_surjective : Function.Surjective (rightHom : N ⋊[φ] G → G) :=
Function.surjective_iff_hasRightInverse.2 ⟨inr, rightHom_inr⟩
#align semidirect_product.right_hom_surjective SemidirectProduct.rightHom_surjective
theorem range_inl_eq_ker_rightHom : (inl : N →* N ⋊[φ] G).range = rightHom.ker :=
le_antisymm (fun _ ↦ by simp (config := { contextual := true }) [MonoidHom.mem_ker, eq_comm])
fun x hx ↦ ⟨x.left, by ext <;> simp_all [MonoidHom.mem_ker]⟩
#align semidirect_product.range_inl_eq_ker_right_hom SemidirectProduct.range_inl_eq_ker_rightHom
section Map
variable {N₁ : Type*} {G₁ : Type*} [Group N₁] [Group G₁] {φ₁ : G₁ →* MulAut N₁}
def map (f₁ : N →* N₁) (f₂ : G →* G₁)
(h : ∀ g : G, f₁.comp (φ g).toMonoidHom = (φ₁ (f₂ g)).toMonoidHom.comp f₁) :
N ⋊[φ] G →* N₁ ⋊[φ₁] G₁ where
toFun x := ⟨f₁ x.1, f₂ x.2⟩
map_one' := by simp
map_mul' x y := by
replace h := DFunLike.ext_iff.1 (h x.right) y.left
ext <;> simp_all
#align semidirect_product.map SemidirectProduct.map
variable (f₁ : N →* N₁) (f₂ : G →* G₁)
(h : ∀ g : G, f₁.comp (φ g).toMonoidHom = (φ₁ (f₂ g)).toMonoidHom.comp f₁)
@[simp]
theorem map_left (g : N ⋊[φ] G) : (map f₁ f₂ h g).left = f₁ g.left := rfl
#align semidirect_product.map_left SemidirectProduct.map_left
@[simp]
theorem map_right (g : N ⋊[φ] G) : (map f₁ f₂ h g).right = f₂ g.right := rfl
#align semidirect_product.map_right SemidirectProduct.map_right
@[simp]
theorem rightHom_comp_map : rightHom.comp (map f₁ f₂ h) = f₂.comp rightHom := rfl
#align semidirect_product.right_hom_comp_map SemidirectProduct.rightHom_comp_map
@[simp]
theorem map_inl (n : N) : map f₁ f₂ h (inl n) = inl (f₁ n) := by simp [map]
#align semidirect_product.map_inl SemidirectProduct.map_inl
@[simp]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/SemidirectProduct.lean | 296 | 296 | theorem map_comp_inl : (map f₁ f₂ h).comp inl = inl.comp f₁ := by | ext <;> simp
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Regular
import Mathlib.Data.Int.GCD
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Order.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Basic
#align_import data.nat.modeq from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"47a1a73351de8dd6c8d3d32b569c8e434b03ca47"
assert_not_exists Function.support
namespace Nat
def ModEq (n a b : ℕ) :=
a % n = b % n
#align nat.modeq Nat.ModEq
@[inherit_doc]
notation:50 a " ≡ " b " [MOD " n "]" => ModEq n a b
variable {m n a b c d : ℕ}
-- Porting note: This instance should be derivable automatically
instance : Decidable (ModEq n a b) := decEq (a % n) (b % n)
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/ModEq.lean | 78 | 78 | theorem modEq_zero_iff_dvd : a ≡ 0 [MOD n] ↔ n ∣ a := by | rw [ModEq, zero_mod, dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Add
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Linear
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineMap
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
(f : 𝕜 →ᵃ[𝕜] E) {a b : E} {L : Filter 𝕜} {s : Set 𝕜} {x : 𝕜}
namespace AffineMap
theorem hasStrictDerivAt : HasStrictDerivAt f (f.linear 1) x := by
rw [f.decomp]
exact f.linear.hasStrictDerivAt.add_const (f 0)
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/Deriv/AffineMap.lean | 36 | 38 | theorem hasDerivAtFilter : HasDerivAtFilter f (f.linear 1) x L := by |
rw [f.decomp]
exact f.linear.hasDerivAtFilter.add_const (f 0)
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Basis
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.NonsingularInverse
#align_import linear_algebra.affine_space.matrix from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2de9c37fa71dde2f1c6feff19876dd6a7b1519f0"
open Affine Matrix
open Set
universe u₁ u₂ u₃ u₄
variable {ι : Type u₁} {k : Type u₂} {V : Type u₃} {P : Type u₄}
variable [AddCommGroup V] [AffineSpace V P]
namespace AffineBasis
section Ring
variable [Ring k] [Module k V] (b : AffineBasis ι k P)
noncomputable def toMatrix {ι' : Type*} (q : ι' → P) : Matrix ι' ι k :=
fun i j => b.coord j (q i)
#align affine_basis.to_matrix AffineBasis.toMatrix
@[simp]
theorem toMatrix_apply {ι' : Type*} (q : ι' → P) (i : ι') (j : ι) :
b.toMatrix q i j = b.coord j (q i) := rfl
#align affine_basis.to_matrix_apply AffineBasis.toMatrix_apply
@[simp]
theorem toMatrix_self [DecidableEq ι] : b.toMatrix b = (1 : Matrix ι ι k) := by
ext i j
rw [toMatrix_apply, coord_apply, Matrix.one_eq_pi_single, Pi.single_apply]
#align affine_basis.to_matrix_self AffineBasis.toMatrix_self
variable {ι' : Type*}
theorem toMatrix_row_sum_one [Fintype ι] (q : ι' → P) (i : ι') : ∑ j, b.toMatrix q i j = 1 := by
simp
#align affine_basis.to_matrix_row_sum_one AffineBasis.toMatrix_row_sum_one
theorem affineIndependent_of_toMatrix_right_inv [Fintype ι] [Finite ι'] [DecidableEq ι']
(p : ι' → P) {A : Matrix ι ι' k} (hA : b.toMatrix p * A = 1) : AffineIndependent k p := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι'
rw [affineIndependent_iff_eq_of_fintype_affineCombination_eq]
intro w₁ w₂ hw₁ hw₂ hweq
have hweq' : w₁ ᵥ* b.toMatrix p = w₂ ᵥ* b.toMatrix p := by
ext j
change (∑ i, w₁ i • b.coord j (p i)) = ∑ i, w₂ i • b.coord j (p i)
-- Porting note: Added `u` because `∘` was causing trouble
have u : (fun i => b.coord j (p i)) = b.coord j ∘ p := by simp only [(· ∘ ·)]
rw [← Finset.univ.affineCombination_eq_linear_combination _ _ hw₁,
← Finset.univ.affineCombination_eq_linear_combination _ _ hw₂, u,
← Finset.univ.map_affineCombination p w₁ hw₁, ← Finset.univ.map_affineCombination p w₂ hw₂,
hweq]
replace hweq' := congr_arg (fun w => w ᵥ* A) hweq'
simpa only [Matrix.vecMul_vecMul, hA, Matrix.vecMul_one] using hweq'
#align affine_basis.affine_independent_of_to_matrix_right_inv AffineBasis.affineIndependent_of_toMatrix_right_inv
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/Matrix.lean | 81 | 105 | theorem affineSpan_eq_top_of_toMatrix_left_inv [Finite ι] [Fintype ι'] [DecidableEq ι]
[Nontrivial k] (p : ι' → P) {A : Matrix ι ι' k} (hA : A * b.toMatrix p = 1) :
affineSpan k (range p) = ⊤ := by |
cases nonempty_fintype ι
suffices ∀ i, b i ∈ affineSpan k (range p) by
rw [eq_top_iff, ← b.tot, affineSpan_le]
rintro q ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact this i
intro i
have hAi : ∑ j, A i j = 1 := by
calc
∑ j, A i j = ∑ j, A i j * ∑ l, b.toMatrix p j l := by simp
_ = ∑ j, ∑ l, A i j * b.toMatrix p j l := by simp_rw [Finset.mul_sum]
_ = ∑ l, ∑ j, A i j * b.toMatrix p j l := by rw [Finset.sum_comm]
_ = ∑ l, (A * b.toMatrix p) i l := rfl
_ = 1 := by simp [hA, Matrix.one_apply, Finset.filter_eq]
have hbi : b i = Finset.univ.affineCombination k p (A i) := by
apply b.ext_elem
intro j
rw [b.coord_apply, Finset.univ.map_affineCombination _ _ hAi,
Finset.univ.affineCombination_eq_linear_combination _ _ hAi]
change _ = (A * b.toMatrix p) i j
simp_rw [hA, Matrix.one_apply, @eq_comm _ i j]
rw [hbi]
exact affineCombination_mem_affineSpan hAi p
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.PiAntidiagonal
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.StdBasis
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
#align_import ring_theory.power_series.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2d5739b61641ee4e7e53eca5688a08f66f2e6a60"
noncomputable section
open Finset (antidiagonal mem_antidiagonal)
def MvPowerSeries (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) :=
(σ →₀ ℕ) → R
#align mv_power_series MvPowerSeries
namespace MvPowerSeries
open Finsupp
variable {σ R : Type*}
instance [Inhabited R] : Inhabited (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
⟨fun _ => default⟩
instance [Zero R] : Zero (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.instZero
instance [AddMonoid R] : AddMonoid (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addMonoid
instance [AddGroup R] : AddGroup (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addGroup
instance [AddCommMonoid R] : AddCommMonoid (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addCommMonoid
instance [AddCommGroup R] : AddCommGroup (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addCommGroup
instance [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Function.nontrivial
instance {A} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] : Module R (MvPowerSeries σ A) :=
Pi.module _ _ _
instance {A S} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] [Module S A] [SMul R S]
[IsScalarTower R S A] : IsScalarTower R S (MvPowerSeries σ A) :=
Pi.isScalarTower
section Semiring
variable (R) [Semiring R]
def monomial (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] MvPowerSeries σ R :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
LinearMap.stdBasis R (fun _ ↦ R) n
#align mv_power_series.monomial MvPowerSeries.monomial
def coeff (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPowerSeries σ R →ₗ[R] R :=
LinearMap.proj n
#align mv_power_series.coeff MvPowerSeries.coeff
variable {R}
@[ext]
theorem ext {φ ψ} (h : ∀ n : σ →₀ ℕ, coeff R n φ = coeff R n ψ) : φ = ψ :=
funext h
#align mv_power_series.ext MvPowerSeries.ext
theorem ext_iff {φ ψ : MvPowerSeries σ R} : φ = ψ ↔ ∀ n : σ →₀ ℕ, coeff R n φ = coeff R n ψ :=
Function.funext_iff
#align mv_power_series.ext_iff MvPowerSeries.ext_iff
theorem monomial_def [DecidableEq σ] (n : σ →₀ ℕ) :
(monomial R n) = LinearMap.stdBasis R (fun _ ↦ R) n := by
rw [monomial]
-- unify the `Decidable` arguments
convert rfl
#align mv_power_series.monomial_def MvPowerSeries.monomial_def
theorem coeff_monomial [DecidableEq σ] (m n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) :
coeff R m (monomial R n a) = if m = n then a else 0 := by
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [coeff, monomial_def, LinearMap.proj_apply (i := m)]
dsimp only
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [LinearMap.stdBasis_apply, Function.update_apply, Pi.zero_apply]
#align mv_power_series.coeff_monomial MvPowerSeries.coeff_monomial
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/MvPowerSeries/Basic.lean | 144 | 147 | theorem coeff_monomial_same (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) : coeff R n (monomial R n a) = a := by |
classical
rw [monomial_def]
exact LinearMap.stdBasis_same R (fun _ ↦ R) n a
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Basic
#align_import data.mv_polynomial.rename from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f5b500a507264de86d666a5f87ddb976e2d8de4"
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
variable {σ τ α R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
namespace MvPolynomial
section Rename
def rename (f : σ → τ) : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] MvPolynomial τ R :=
aeval (X ∘ f)
#align mv_polynomial.rename MvPolynomial.rename
theorem rename_C (f : σ → τ) (r : R) : rename f (C r) = C r :=
eval₂_C _ _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.rename_C MvPolynomial.rename_C
@[simp]
theorem rename_X (f : σ → τ) (i : σ) : rename f (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = X (f i) :=
eval₂_X _ _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.rename_X MvPolynomial.rename_X
theorem map_rename (f : R →+* S) (g : σ → τ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
map f (rename g p) = rename g (map f p) := by
apply MvPolynomial.induction_on p
(fun a => by simp only [map_C, rename_C])
(fun p q hp hq => by simp only [hp, hq, AlgHom.map_add, RingHom.map_add]) fun p n hp => by
simp only [hp, rename_X, map_X, RingHom.map_mul, AlgHom.map_mul]
#align mv_polynomial.map_rename MvPolynomial.map_rename
@[simp]
theorem rename_rename (f : σ → τ) (g : τ → α) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
rename g (rename f p) = rename (g ∘ f) p :=
show rename g (eval₂ C (X ∘ f) p) = _ by
simp only [rename, aeval_eq_eval₂Hom]
-- Porting note: the Lean 3 proof of this was very fragile and included a nonterminal `simp`.
-- Hopefully this is less prone to breaking
rw [eval₂_comp_left (eval₂Hom (algebraMap R (MvPolynomial α R)) (X ∘ g)) C (X ∘ f) p]
simp only [(· ∘ ·), eval₂Hom_X']
refine eval₂Hom_congr ?_ rfl rfl
ext1; simp only [comp_apply, RingHom.coe_comp, eval₂Hom_C]
#align mv_polynomial.rename_rename MvPolynomial.rename_rename
@[simp]
theorem rename_id (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : rename id p = p :=
eval₂_eta p
#align mv_polynomial.rename_id MvPolynomial.rename_id
theorem rename_monomial (f : σ → τ) (d : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) :
rename f (monomial d r) = monomial (d.mapDomain f) r := by
rw [rename, aeval_monomial, monomial_eq (s := Finsupp.mapDomain f d),
Finsupp.prod_mapDomain_index]
· rfl
· exact fun n => pow_zero _
· exact fun n i₁ i₂ => pow_add _ _ _
#align mv_polynomial.rename_monomial MvPolynomial.rename_monomial
theorem rename_eq (f : σ → τ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
rename f p = Finsupp.mapDomain (Finsupp.mapDomain f) p := by
simp only [rename, aeval_def, eval₂, Finsupp.mapDomain, algebraMap_eq, comp_apply,
X_pow_eq_monomial, ← monomial_finsupp_sum_index]
rfl
#align mv_polynomial.rename_eq MvPolynomial.rename_eq
theorem rename_injective (f : σ → τ) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (rename f : MvPolynomial σ R → MvPolynomial τ R) := by
have :
(rename f : MvPolynomial σ R → MvPolynomial τ R) = Finsupp.mapDomain (Finsupp.mapDomain f) :=
funext (rename_eq f)
rw [this]
exact Finsupp.mapDomain_injective (Finsupp.mapDomain_injective hf)
#align mv_polynomial.rename_injective MvPolynomial.rename_injective
section
variable {f : σ → τ} (hf : Function.Injective f)
open scoped Classical
def killCompl : MvPolynomial τ R →ₐ[R] MvPolynomial σ R :=
aeval fun i => if h : i ∈ Set.range f then X <| (Equiv.ofInjective f hf).symm ⟨i, h⟩ else 0
#align mv_polynomial.kill_compl MvPolynomial.killCompl
theorem killCompl_C (r : R) : killCompl hf (C r) = C r := algHom_C _ _
theorem killCompl_comp_rename : (killCompl hf).comp (rename f) = AlgHom.id R _ :=
algHom_ext fun i => by
dsimp
rw [rename, killCompl, aeval_X, comp_apply, aeval_X, dif_pos, Equiv.ofInjective_symm_apply]
#align mv_polynomial.kill_compl_comp_rename MvPolynomial.killCompl_comp_rename
@[simp]
theorem killCompl_rename_app (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : killCompl hf (rename f p) = p :=
AlgHom.congr_fun (killCompl_comp_rename hf) p
#align mv_polynomial.kill_compl_rename_app MvPolynomial.killCompl_rename_app
end
section
variable (R)
@[simps apply]
def renameEquiv (f : σ ≃ τ) : MvPolynomial σ R ≃ₐ[R] MvPolynomial τ R :=
{ rename f with
toFun := rename f
invFun := rename f.symm
left_inv := fun p => by rw [rename_rename, f.symm_comp_self, rename_id]
right_inv := fun p => by rw [rename_rename, f.self_comp_symm, rename_id] }
#align mv_polynomial.rename_equiv MvPolynomial.renameEquiv
@[simp]
theorem renameEquiv_refl : renameEquiv R (Equiv.refl σ) = AlgEquiv.refl :=
AlgEquiv.ext rename_id
#align mv_polynomial.rename_equiv_refl MvPolynomial.renameEquiv_refl
@[simp]
theorem renameEquiv_symm (f : σ ≃ τ) : (renameEquiv R f).symm = renameEquiv R f.symm :=
rfl
#align mv_polynomial.rename_equiv_symm MvPolynomial.renameEquiv_symm
@[simp]
theorem renameEquiv_trans (e : σ ≃ τ) (f : τ ≃ α) :
(renameEquiv R e).trans (renameEquiv R f) = renameEquiv R (e.trans f) :=
AlgEquiv.ext (rename_rename e f)
#align mv_polynomial.rename_equiv_trans MvPolynomial.renameEquiv_trans
end
section
variable (f : R →+* S) (k : σ → τ) (g : τ → S) (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
theorem eval₂_rename : (rename k p).eval₂ f g = p.eval₂ f (g ∘ k) := by
apply MvPolynomial.induction_on p <;>
· intros
simp [*]
#align mv_polynomial.eval₂_rename MvPolynomial.eval₂_rename
theorem eval_rename (g : τ → R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : eval g (rename k p) = eval (g ∘ k) p :=
eval₂_rename _ _ _ _
theorem eval₂Hom_rename : eval₂Hom f g (rename k p) = eval₂Hom f (g ∘ k) p :=
eval₂_rename _ _ _ _
#align mv_polynomial.eval₂_hom_rename MvPolynomial.eval₂Hom_rename
theorem aeval_rename [Algebra R S] : aeval g (rename k p) = aeval (g ∘ k) p :=
eval₂Hom_rename _ _ _ _
#align mv_polynomial.aeval_rename MvPolynomial.aeval_rename
theorem rename_eval₂ (g : τ → MvPolynomial σ R) :
rename k (p.eval₂ C (g ∘ k)) = (rename k p).eval₂ C (rename k ∘ g) := by
apply MvPolynomial.induction_on p <;>
· intros
simp [*]
#align mv_polynomial.rename_eval₂ MvPolynomial.rename_eval₂
theorem rename_prod_mk_eval₂ (j : τ) (g : σ → MvPolynomial σ R) :
rename (Prod.mk j) (p.eval₂ C g) = p.eval₂ C fun x => rename (Prod.mk j) (g x) := by
apply MvPolynomial.induction_on p <;>
· intros
simp [*]
#align mv_polynomial.rename_prodmk_eval₂ MvPolynomial.rename_prod_mk_eval₂
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Rename.lean | 213 | 217 | theorem eval₂_rename_prod_mk (g : σ × τ → S) (i : σ) (p : MvPolynomial τ R) :
(rename (Prod.mk i) p).eval₂ f g = eval₂ f (fun j => g (i, j)) p := by |
apply MvPolynomial.induction_on p <;>
· intros
simp [*]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.MeanInequalities
import Mathlib.Analysis.MeanInequalitiesPow
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Continuity
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.LiminfLimsup
#align_import analysis.normed_space.lp_space from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"de83b43717abe353f425855fcf0cedf9ea0fe8a4"
noncomputable section
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Function
variable {α : Type*} {E : α → Type*} {p q : ℝ≥0∞} [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (E i)]
def Memℓp (f : ∀ i, E i) (p : ℝ≥0∞) : Prop :=
if p = 0 then Set.Finite { i | f i ≠ 0 }
else if p = ∞ then BddAbove (Set.range fun i => ‖f i‖)
else Summable fun i => ‖f i‖ ^ p.toReal
#align mem_ℓp Memℓp
theorem memℓp_zero_iff {f : ∀ i, E i} : Memℓp f 0 ↔ Set.Finite { i | f i ≠ 0 } := by
dsimp [Memℓp]
rw [if_pos rfl]
#align mem_ℓp_zero_iff memℓp_zero_iff
theorem memℓp_zero {f : ∀ i, E i} (hf : Set.Finite { i | f i ≠ 0 }) : Memℓp f 0 :=
memℓp_zero_iff.2 hf
#align mem_ℓp_zero memℓp_zero
theorem memℓp_infty_iff {f : ∀ i, E i} : Memℓp f ∞ ↔ BddAbove (Set.range fun i => ‖f i‖) := by
dsimp [Memℓp]
rw [if_neg ENNReal.top_ne_zero, if_pos rfl]
#align mem_ℓp_infty_iff memℓp_infty_iff
theorem memℓp_infty {f : ∀ i, E i} (hf : BddAbove (Set.range fun i => ‖f i‖)) : Memℓp f ∞ :=
memℓp_infty_iff.2 hf
#align mem_ℓp_infty memℓp_infty
theorem memℓp_gen_iff (hp : 0 < p.toReal) {f : ∀ i, E i} :
Memℓp f p ↔ Summable fun i => ‖f i‖ ^ p.toReal := by
rw [ENNReal.toReal_pos_iff] at hp
dsimp [Memℓp]
rw [if_neg hp.1.ne', if_neg hp.2.ne]
#align mem_ℓp_gen_iff memℓp_gen_iff
theorem memℓp_gen {f : ∀ i, E i} (hf : Summable fun i => ‖f i‖ ^ p.toReal) : Memℓp f p := by
rcases p.trichotomy with (rfl | rfl | hp)
· apply memℓp_zero
have H : Summable fun _ : α => (1 : ℝ) := by simpa using hf
exact (Set.Finite.of_summable_const (by norm_num) H).subset (Set.subset_univ _)
· apply memℓp_infty
have H : Summable fun _ : α => (1 : ℝ) := by simpa using hf
simpa using ((Set.Finite.of_summable_const (by norm_num) H).image fun i => ‖f i‖).bddAbove
exact (memℓp_gen_iff hp).2 hf
#align mem_ℓp_gen memℓp_gen
theorem memℓp_gen' {C : ℝ} {f : ∀ i, E i} (hf : ∀ s : Finset α, ∑ i ∈ s, ‖f i‖ ^ p.toReal ≤ C) :
Memℓp f p := by
apply memℓp_gen
use ⨆ s : Finset α, ∑ i ∈ s, ‖f i‖ ^ p.toReal
apply hasSum_of_isLUB_of_nonneg
· intro b
exact Real.rpow_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) _
apply isLUB_ciSup
use C
rintro - ⟨s, rfl⟩
exact hf s
#align mem_ℓp_gen' memℓp_gen'
theorem zero_memℓp : Memℓp (0 : ∀ i, E i) p := by
rcases p.trichotomy with (rfl | rfl | hp)
· apply memℓp_zero
simp
· apply memℓp_infty
simp only [norm_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
exact bddAbove_singleton.mono Set.range_const_subset
· apply memℓp_gen
simp [Real.zero_rpow hp.ne', summable_zero]
#align zero_mem_ℓp zero_memℓp
theorem zero_mem_ℓp' : Memℓp (fun i : α => (0 : E i)) p :=
zero_memℓp
#align zero_mem_ℓp' zero_mem_ℓp'
namespace Memℓp
theorem finite_dsupport {f : ∀ i, E i} (hf : Memℓp f 0) : Set.Finite { i | f i ≠ 0 } :=
memℓp_zero_iff.1 hf
#align mem_ℓp.finite_dsupport Memℓp.finite_dsupport
theorem bddAbove {f : ∀ i, E i} (hf : Memℓp f ∞) : BddAbove (Set.range fun i => ‖f i‖) :=
memℓp_infty_iff.1 hf
#align mem_ℓp.bdd_above Memℓp.bddAbove
theorem summable (hp : 0 < p.toReal) {f : ∀ i, E i} (hf : Memℓp f p) :
Summable fun i => ‖f i‖ ^ p.toReal :=
(memℓp_gen_iff hp).1 hf
#align mem_ℓp.summable Memℓp.summable
theorem neg {f : ∀ i, E i} (hf : Memℓp f p) : Memℓp (-f) p := by
rcases p.trichotomy with (rfl | rfl | hp)
· apply memℓp_zero
simp [hf.finite_dsupport]
· apply memℓp_infty
simpa using hf.bddAbove
· apply memℓp_gen
simpa using hf.summable hp
#align mem_ℓp.neg Memℓp.neg
@[simp]
theorem neg_iff {f : ∀ i, E i} : Memℓp (-f) p ↔ Memℓp f p :=
⟨fun h => neg_neg f ▸ h.neg, Memℓp.neg⟩
#align mem_ℓp.neg_iff Memℓp.neg_iff
theorem of_exponent_ge {p q : ℝ≥0∞} {f : ∀ i, E i} (hfq : Memℓp f q) (hpq : q ≤ p) : Memℓp f p := by
rcases ENNReal.trichotomy₂ hpq with
(⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, hp⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨hq, rfl⟩ | ⟨hq, _, hpq'⟩)
· exact hfq
· apply memℓp_infty
obtain ⟨C, hC⟩ := (hfq.finite_dsupport.image fun i => ‖f i‖).bddAbove
use max 0 C
rintro x ⟨i, rfl⟩
by_cases hi : f i = 0
· simp [hi]
· exact (hC ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩).trans (le_max_right _ _)
· apply memℓp_gen
have : ∀ i ∉ hfq.finite_dsupport.toFinset, ‖f i‖ ^ p.toReal = 0 := by
intro i hi
have : f i = 0 := by simpa using hi
simp [this, Real.zero_rpow hp.ne']
exact summable_of_ne_finset_zero this
· exact hfq
· apply memℓp_infty
obtain ⟨A, hA⟩ := (hfq.summable hq).tendsto_cofinite_zero.bddAbove_range_of_cofinite
use A ^ q.toReal⁻¹
rintro x ⟨i, rfl⟩
have : 0 ≤ ‖f i‖ ^ q.toReal := by positivity
simpa [← Real.rpow_mul, mul_inv_cancel hq.ne'] using
Real.rpow_le_rpow this (hA ⟨i, rfl⟩) (inv_nonneg.mpr hq.le)
· apply memℓp_gen
have hf' := hfq.summable hq
refine .of_norm_bounded_eventually _ hf' (@Set.Finite.subset _ { i | 1 ≤ ‖f i‖ } ?_ _ ?_)
· have H : { x : α | 1 ≤ ‖f x‖ ^ q.toReal }.Finite := by
simpa using eventually_lt_of_tendsto_lt (by norm_num) hf'.tendsto_cofinite_zero
exact H.subset fun i hi => Real.one_le_rpow hi hq.le
· show ∀ i, ¬|‖f i‖ ^ p.toReal| ≤ ‖f i‖ ^ q.toReal → 1 ≤ ‖f i‖
intro i hi
have : 0 ≤ ‖f i‖ ^ p.toReal := Real.rpow_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) p.toReal
simp only [abs_of_nonneg, this] at hi
contrapose! hi
exact Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge' (norm_nonneg _) hi.le hq.le hpq'
#align mem_ℓp.of_exponent_ge Memℓp.of_exponent_ge
theorem add {f g : ∀ i, E i} (hf : Memℓp f p) (hg : Memℓp g p) : Memℓp (f + g) p := by
rcases p.trichotomy with (rfl | rfl | hp)
· apply memℓp_zero
refine (hf.finite_dsupport.union hg.finite_dsupport).subset fun i => ?_
simp only [Pi.add_apply, Ne, Set.mem_union, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
contrapose!
rintro ⟨hf', hg'⟩
simp [hf', hg']
· apply memℓp_infty
obtain ⟨A, hA⟩ := hf.bddAbove
obtain ⟨B, hB⟩ := hg.bddAbove
refine ⟨A + B, ?_⟩
rintro a ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact le_trans (norm_add_le _ _) (add_le_add (hA ⟨i, rfl⟩) (hB ⟨i, rfl⟩))
apply memℓp_gen
let C : ℝ := if p.toReal < 1 then 1 else (2 : ℝ) ^ (p.toReal - 1)
refine .of_nonneg_of_le ?_ (fun i => ?_) (((hf.summable hp).add (hg.summable hp)).mul_left C)
· intro; positivity
· refine (Real.rpow_le_rpow (norm_nonneg _) (norm_add_le _ _) hp.le).trans ?_
dsimp only [C]
split_ifs with h
· simpa using NNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (NNReal.rpow_add_le_add_rpow ‖f i‖₊ ‖g i‖₊ hp.le h.le)
· let F : Fin 2 → ℝ≥0 := ![‖f i‖₊, ‖g i‖₊]
simp only [not_lt] at h
simpa [Fin.sum_univ_succ] using
Real.rpow_sum_le_const_mul_sum_rpow_of_nonneg Finset.univ h fun i _ => (F i).coe_nonneg
#align mem_ℓp.add Memℓp.add
theorem sub {f g : ∀ i, E i} (hf : Memℓp f p) (hg : Memℓp g p) : Memℓp (f - g) p := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]; exact hf.add hg.neg
#align mem_ℓp.sub Memℓp.sub
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/lpSpace.lean | 246 | 254 | theorem finset_sum {ι} (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → ∀ i, E i} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, Memℓp (f i) p) :
Memℓp (fun a => ∑ i ∈ s, f i a) p := by |
haveI : DecidableEq ι := Classical.decEq _
revert hf
refine Finset.induction_on s ?_ ?_
· simp only [zero_mem_ℓp', Finset.sum_empty, imp_true_iff]
· intro i s his ih hf
simp only [his, Finset.sum_insert, not_false_iff]
exact (hf i (s.mem_insert_self i)).add (ih fun j hj => hf j (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hj))
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Maps
import Mathlib.Topology.NhdsSet
#align_import topology.constructions from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f7ebde7ee0d1505dfccac8644ae12371aa3c1c9f"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology TopologicalSpace Set Filter Function
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {Z W ε ζ : Type*}
section Constructions
instance instTopologicalSpaceSubtype {p : X → Prop} [t : TopologicalSpace X] :
TopologicalSpace (Subtype p) :=
induced (↑) t
instance {r : X → X → Prop} [t : TopologicalSpace X] : TopologicalSpace (Quot r) :=
coinduced (Quot.mk r) t
instance instTopologicalSpaceQuotient {s : Setoid X} [t : TopologicalSpace X] :
TopologicalSpace (Quotient s) :=
coinduced Quotient.mk' t
instance instTopologicalSpaceProd [t₁ : TopologicalSpace X] [t₂ : TopologicalSpace Y] :
TopologicalSpace (X × Y) :=
induced Prod.fst t₁ ⊓ induced Prod.snd t₂
instance instTopologicalSpaceSum [t₁ : TopologicalSpace X] [t₂ : TopologicalSpace Y] :
TopologicalSpace (X ⊕ Y) :=
coinduced Sum.inl t₁ ⊔ coinduced Sum.inr t₂
instance instTopologicalSpaceSigma {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type v} [t₂ : ∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] :
TopologicalSpace (Sigma X) :=
⨆ i, coinduced (Sigma.mk i) (t₂ i)
instance Pi.topologicalSpace {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → Type v} [t₂ : (i : ι) → TopologicalSpace (Y i)] :
TopologicalSpace ((i : ι) → Y i) :=
⨅ i, induced (fun f => f i) (t₂ i)
#align Pi.topological_space Pi.topologicalSpace
instance ULift.topologicalSpace [t : TopologicalSpace X] : TopologicalSpace (ULift.{v, u} X) :=
t.induced ULift.down
#align ulift.topological_space ULift.topologicalSpace
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
open Additive Multiplicative
instance : TopologicalSpace (Additive X) := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance : TopologicalSpace (Multiplicative X) := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Additive X) := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Multiplicative X) := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
theorem continuous_ofMul : Continuous (ofMul : X → Additive X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_of_mul continuous_ofMul
theorem continuous_toMul : Continuous (toMul : Additive X → X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_to_mul continuous_toMul
theorem continuous_ofAdd : Continuous (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_of_add continuous_ofAdd
theorem continuous_toAdd : Continuous (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_to_add continuous_toAdd
theorem isOpenMap_ofMul : IsOpenMap (ofMul : X → Additive X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_of_mul isOpenMap_ofMul
theorem isOpenMap_toMul : IsOpenMap (toMul : Additive X → X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_to_mul isOpenMap_toMul
theorem isOpenMap_ofAdd : IsOpenMap (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_of_add isOpenMap_ofAdd
theorem isOpenMap_toAdd : IsOpenMap (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_to_add isOpenMap_toAdd
theorem isClosedMap_ofMul : IsClosedMap (ofMul : X → Additive X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_of_mul isClosedMap_ofMul
theorem isClosedMap_toMul : IsClosedMap (toMul : Additive X → X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_to_mul isClosedMap_toMul
theorem isClosedMap_ofAdd : IsClosedMap (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_of_add isClosedMap_ofAdd
theorem isClosedMap_toAdd : IsClosedMap (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_to_add isClosedMap_toAdd
theorem nhds_ofMul (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofMul x) = map ofMul (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_of_mul nhds_ofMul
theorem nhds_ofAdd (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofAdd x) = map ofAdd (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_of_add nhds_ofAdd
theorem nhds_toMul (x : Additive X) : 𝓝 (toMul x) = map toMul (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_to_mul nhds_toMul
theorem nhds_toAdd (x : Multiplicative X) : 𝓝 (toAdd x) = map toAdd (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_to_add nhds_toAdd
end
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
open OrderDual
instance : TopologicalSpace Xᵒᵈ := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology Xᵒᵈ := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
theorem continuous_toDual : Continuous (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := continuous_id
#align continuous_to_dual continuous_toDual
theorem continuous_ofDual : Continuous (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_of_dual continuous_ofDual
theorem isOpenMap_toDual : IsOpenMap (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_to_dual isOpenMap_toDual
theorem isOpenMap_ofDual : IsOpenMap (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_of_dual isOpenMap_ofDual
theorem isClosedMap_toDual : IsClosedMap (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_to_dual isClosedMap_toDual
theorem isClosedMap_ofDual : IsClosedMap (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_of_dual isClosedMap_ofDual
theorem nhds_toDual (x : X) : 𝓝 (toDual x) = map toDual (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_to_dual nhds_toDual
theorem nhds_ofDual (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofDual x) = map ofDual (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_of_dual nhds_ofDual
end
theorem Quotient.preimage_mem_nhds [TopologicalSpace X] [s : Setoid X] {V : Set <| Quotient s}
{x : X} (hs : V ∈ 𝓝 (Quotient.mk' x)) : Quotient.mk' ⁻¹' V ∈ 𝓝 x :=
preimage_nhds_coinduced hs
#align quotient.preimage_mem_nhds Quotient.preimage_mem_nhds
theorem Dense.quotient [Setoid X] [TopologicalSpace X] {s : Set X} (H : Dense s) :
Dense (Quotient.mk' '' s) :=
Quotient.surjective_Quotient_mk''.denseRange.dense_image continuous_coinduced_rng H
#align dense.quotient Dense.quotient
theorem DenseRange.quotient [Setoid X] [TopologicalSpace X] {f : Y → X} (hf : DenseRange f) :
DenseRange (Quotient.mk' ∘ f) :=
Quotient.surjective_Quotient_mk''.denseRange.comp hf continuous_coinduced_rng
#align dense_range.quotient DenseRange.quotient
theorem continuous_map_of_le {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{s t : Setoid α} (h : s ≤ t) : Continuous (Setoid.map_of_le h) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem continuous_map_sInf {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{S : Set (Setoid α)} {s : Setoid α} (h : s ∈ S) : Continuous (Setoid.map_sInf h) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
instance {p : X → Prop} [TopologicalSpace X] [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Subtype p) :=
⟨bot_unique fun s _ => ⟨(↑) '' s, isOpen_discrete _, preimage_image_eq _ Subtype.val_injective⟩⟩
instance Sum.discreteTopology [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [h : DiscreteTopology X]
[hY : DiscreteTopology Y] : DiscreteTopology (X ⊕ Y) :=
⟨sup_eq_bot_iff.2 <| by simp [h.eq_bot, hY.eq_bot]⟩
#align sum.discrete_topology Sum.discreteTopology
instance Sigma.discreteTopology {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → Type v} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
[h : ∀ i, DiscreteTopology (Y i)] : DiscreteTopology (Sigma Y) :=
⟨iSup_eq_bot.2 fun _ => by simp only [(h _).eq_bot, coinduced_bot]⟩
#align sigma.discrete_topology Sigma.discreteTopology
def CofiniteTopology (X : Type*) := X
#align cofinite_topology CofiniteTopology
section Prod
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z] [TopologicalSpace W]
[TopologicalSpace ε] [TopologicalSpace ζ]
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: Lean 4 fails to deduce implicit args
@[simp] theorem continuous_prod_mk {f : X → Y} {g : X → Z} :
(Continuous fun x => (f x, g x)) ↔ Continuous f ∧ Continuous g :=
(@continuous_inf_rng X (Y × Z) _ _ (TopologicalSpace.induced Prod.fst _)
(TopologicalSpace.induced Prod.snd _)).trans <|
continuous_induced_rng.and continuous_induced_rng
#align continuous_prod_mk continuous_prod_mk
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_fst : Continuous (@Prod.fst X Y) :=
(continuous_prod_mk.1 continuous_id).1
#align continuous_fst continuous_fst
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.fst {f : X → Y × Z} (hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun x : X => (f x).1 :=
continuous_fst.comp hf
#align continuous.fst Continuous.fst
theorem Continuous.fst' {f : X → Z} (hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun x : X × Y => f x.fst :=
hf.comp continuous_fst
#align continuous.fst' Continuous.fst'
theorem continuousAt_fst {p : X × Y} : ContinuousAt Prod.fst p :=
continuous_fst.continuousAt
#align continuous_at_fst continuousAt_fst
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousAt.fst {f : X → Y × Z} {x : X} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X => (f x).1) x :=
continuousAt_fst.comp hf
#align continuous_at.fst ContinuousAt.fst
theorem ContinuousAt.fst' {f : X → Z} {x : X} {y : Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X × Y => f x.fst) (x, y) :=
ContinuousAt.comp hf continuousAt_fst
#align continuous_at.fst' ContinuousAt.fst'
theorem ContinuousAt.fst'' {f : X → Z} {x : X × Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f x.fst) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X × Y => f x.fst) x :=
hf.comp continuousAt_fst
#align continuous_at.fst'' ContinuousAt.fst''
theorem Filter.Tendsto.fst_nhds {l : Filter X} {f : X → Y × Z} {p : Y × Z}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 p)) : Tendsto (fun a ↦ (f a).1) l (𝓝 <| p.1) :=
continuousAt_fst.tendsto.comp h
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_snd : Continuous (@Prod.snd X Y) :=
(continuous_prod_mk.1 continuous_id).2
#align continuous_snd continuous_snd
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.snd {f : X → Y × Z} (hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun x : X => (f x).2 :=
continuous_snd.comp hf
#align continuous.snd Continuous.snd
theorem Continuous.snd' {f : Y → Z} (hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun x : X × Y => f x.snd :=
hf.comp continuous_snd
#align continuous.snd' Continuous.snd'
theorem continuousAt_snd {p : X × Y} : ContinuousAt Prod.snd p :=
continuous_snd.continuousAt
#align continuous_at_snd continuousAt_snd
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousAt.snd {f : X → Y × Z} {x : X} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X => (f x).2) x :=
continuousAt_snd.comp hf
#align continuous_at.snd ContinuousAt.snd
theorem ContinuousAt.snd' {f : Y → Z} {x : X} {y : Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f y) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X × Y => f x.snd) (x, y) :=
ContinuousAt.comp hf continuousAt_snd
#align continuous_at.snd' ContinuousAt.snd'
theorem ContinuousAt.snd'' {f : Y → Z} {x : X × Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f x.snd) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X × Y => f x.snd) x :=
hf.comp continuousAt_snd
#align continuous_at.snd'' ContinuousAt.snd''
theorem Filter.Tendsto.snd_nhds {l : Filter X} {f : X → Y × Z} {p : Y × Z}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 p)) : Tendsto (fun a ↦ (f a).2) l (𝓝 <| p.2) :=
continuousAt_snd.tendsto.comp h
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.prod_mk {f : Z → X} {g : Z → Y} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous fun x => (f x, g x) :=
continuous_prod_mk.2 ⟨hf, hg⟩
#align continuous.prod_mk Continuous.prod_mk
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.Prod.mk (x : X) : Continuous fun y : Y => (x, y) :=
continuous_const.prod_mk continuous_id
#align continuous.prod.mk Continuous.Prod.mk
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.Prod.mk_left (y : Y) : Continuous fun x : X => (x, y) :=
continuous_id.prod_mk continuous_const
#align continuous.prod.mk_left Continuous.Prod.mk_left
lemma IsClosed.setOf_mapsTo {α : Type*} {f : X → α → Z} {s : Set α} {t : Set Z} (ht : IsClosed t)
(hf : ∀ a ∈ s, Continuous (f · a)) : IsClosed {x | MapsTo (f x) s t} := by
simpa only [MapsTo, setOf_forall] using isClosed_biInter fun y hy ↦ ht.preimage (hf y hy)
theorem Continuous.comp₂ {g : X × Y → Z} (hg : Continuous g) {e : W → X} (he : Continuous e)
{f : W → Y} (hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun w => g (e w, f w) :=
hg.comp <| he.prod_mk hf
#align continuous.comp₂ Continuous.comp₂
theorem Continuous.comp₃ {g : X × Y × Z → ε} (hg : Continuous g) {e : W → X} (he : Continuous e)
{f : W → Y} (hf : Continuous f) {k : W → Z} (hk : Continuous k) :
Continuous fun w => g (e w, f w, k w) :=
hg.comp₂ he <| hf.prod_mk hk
#align continuous.comp₃ Continuous.comp₃
theorem Continuous.comp₄ {g : X × Y × Z × ζ → ε} (hg : Continuous g) {e : W → X} (he : Continuous e)
{f : W → Y} (hf : Continuous f) {k : W → Z} (hk : Continuous k) {l : W → ζ}
(hl : Continuous l) : Continuous fun w => g (e w, f w, k w, l w) :=
hg.comp₃ he hf <| hk.prod_mk hl
#align continuous.comp₄ Continuous.comp₄
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.prod_map {f : Z → X} {g : W → Y} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous fun p : Z × W => (f p.1, g p.2) :=
hf.fst'.prod_mk hg.snd'
#align continuous.prod_map Continuous.prod_map
theorem continuous_inf_dom_left₂ {X Y Z} {f : X → Y → Z} {ta1 ta2 : TopologicalSpace X}
{tb1 tb2 : TopologicalSpace Y} {tc1 : TopologicalSpace Z}
(h : by haveI := ta1; haveI := tb1; exact Continuous fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := ta1 ⊓ ta2; haveI := tb1 ⊓ tb2; exact Continuous fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2 := by
have ha := @continuous_inf_dom_left _ _ id ta1 ta2 ta1 (@continuous_id _ (id _))
have hb := @continuous_inf_dom_left _ _ id tb1 tb2 tb1 (@continuous_id _ (id _))
have h_continuous_id := @Continuous.prod_map _ _ _ _ ta1 tb1 (ta1 ⊓ ta2) (tb1 ⊓ tb2) _ _ ha hb
exact @Continuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ h h_continuous_id
#align continuous_inf_dom_left₂ continuous_inf_dom_left₂
theorem continuous_inf_dom_right₂ {X Y Z} {f : X → Y → Z} {ta1 ta2 : TopologicalSpace X}
{tb1 tb2 : TopologicalSpace Y} {tc1 : TopologicalSpace Z}
(h : by haveI := ta2; haveI := tb2; exact Continuous fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := ta1 ⊓ ta2; haveI := tb1 ⊓ tb2; exact Continuous fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2 := by
have ha := @continuous_inf_dom_right _ _ id ta1 ta2 ta2 (@continuous_id _ (id _))
have hb := @continuous_inf_dom_right _ _ id tb1 tb2 tb2 (@continuous_id _ (id _))
have h_continuous_id := @Continuous.prod_map _ _ _ _ ta2 tb2 (ta1 ⊓ ta2) (tb1 ⊓ tb2) _ _ ha hb
exact @Continuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ h h_continuous_id
#align continuous_inf_dom_right₂ continuous_inf_dom_right₂
theorem continuous_sInf_dom₂ {X Y Z} {f : X → Y → Z} {tas : Set (TopologicalSpace X)}
{tbs : Set (TopologicalSpace Y)} {tX : TopologicalSpace X} {tY : TopologicalSpace Y}
{tc : TopologicalSpace Z} (hX : tX ∈ tas) (hY : tY ∈ tbs)
(hf : Continuous fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := sInf tas; haveI := sInf tbs;
exact @Continuous _ _ _ tc fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2 := by
have hX := continuous_sInf_dom hX continuous_id
have hY := continuous_sInf_dom hY continuous_id
have h_continuous_id := @Continuous.prod_map _ _ _ _ tX tY (sInf tas) (sInf tbs) _ _ hX hY
exact @Continuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ hf h_continuous_id
#align continuous_Inf_dom₂ continuous_sInf_dom₂
theorem Filter.Eventually.prod_inl_nhds {p : X → Prop} {x : X} (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, p x) (y : Y) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 (x, y), p (x : X × Y).1 :=
continuousAt_fst h
#align filter.eventually.prod_inl_nhds Filter.Eventually.prod_inl_nhds
theorem Filter.Eventually.prod_inr_nhds {p : Y → Prop} {y : Y} (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 y, p x) (x : X) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 (x, y), p (x : X × Y).2 :=
continuousAt_snd h
#align filter.eventually.prod_inr_nhds Filter.Eventually.prod_inr_nhds
theorem Filter.Eventually.prod_mk_nhds {px : X → Prop} {x} (hx : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, px x) {py : Y → Prop}
{y} (hy : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 y, py y) : ∀ᶠ p in 𝓝 (x, y), px (p : X × Y).1 ∧ py p.2 :=
(hx.prod_inl_nhds y).and (hy.prod_inr_nhds x)
#align filter.eventually.prod_mk_nhds Filter.Eventually.prod_mk_nhds
theorem continuous_swap : Continuous (Prod.swap : X × Y → Y × X) :=
continuous_snd.prod_mk continuous_fst
#align continuous_swap continuous_swap
lemma isClosedMap_swap : IsClosedMap (Prod.swap : X × Y → Y × X) := fun s hs ↦ by
rw [image_swap_eq_preimage_swap]
exact hs.preimage continuous_swap
theorem Continuous.uncurry_left {f : X → Y → Z} (x : X) (h : Continuous (uncurry f)) :
Continuous (f x) :=
h.comp (Continuous.Prod.mk _)
#align continuous_uncurry_left Continuous.uncurry_left
theorem Continuous.uncurry_right {f : X → Y → Z} (y : Y) (h : Continuous (uncurry f)) :
Continuous fun a => f a y :=
h.comp (Continuous.Prod.mk_left _)
#align continuous_uncurry_right Continuous.uncurry_right
-- 2024-03-09
@[deprecated] alias continuous_uncurry_left := Continuous.uncurry_left
@[deprecated] alias continuous_uncurry_right := Continuous.uncurry_right
theorem continuous_curry {g : X × Y → Z} (x : X) (h : Continuous g) : Continuous (curry g x) :=
Continuous.uncurry_left x h
#align continuous_curry continuous_curry
theorem IsOpen.prod {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (hs : IsOpen s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsOpen (s ×ˢ t) :=
(hs.preimage continuous_fst).inter (ht.preimage continuous_snd)
#align is_open.prod IsOpen.prod
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: Lean fails to find `t₁` and `t₂` by unification
theorem nhds_prod_eq {x : X} {y : Y} : 𝓝 (x, y) = 𝓝 x ×ˢ 𝓝 y := by
dsimp only [SProd.sprod]
rw [Filter.prod, instTopologicalSpaceProd, nhds_inf (t₁ := TopologicalSpace.induced Prod.fst _)
(t₂ := TopologicalSpace.induced Prod.snd _), nhds_induced, nhds_induced]
#align nhds_prod_eq nhds_prod_eq
-- Porting note: moved from `Topology.ContinuousOn`
theorem nhdsWithin_prod_eq (x : X) (y : Y) (s : Set X) (t : Set Y) :
𝓝[s ×ˢ t] (x, y) = 𝓝[s] x ×ˢ 𝓝[t] y := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_prod_eq, ← prod_inf_prod, prod_principal_principal]
#align nhds_within_prod_eq nhdsWithin_prod_eq
#noalign continuous_uncurry_of_discrete_topology
theorem mem_nhds_prod_iff {x : X} {y : Y} {s : Set (X × Y)} :
s ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 x, ∃ v ∈ 𝓝 y, u ×ˢ v ⊆ s := by rw [nhds_prod_eq, mem_prod_iff]
#align mem_nhds_prod_iff mem_nhds_prod_iff
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_prod_iff {x : X} {y : Y} {s : Set (X × Y)} {tx : Set X} {ty : Set Y} :
s ∈ 𝓝[tx ×ˢ ty] (x, y) ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝[tx] x, ∃ v ∈ 𝓝[ty] y, u ×ˢ v ⊆ s := by
rw [nhdsWithin_prod_eq, mem_prod_iff]
-- Porting note: moved up
theorem Filter.HasBasis.prod_nhds {ιX ιY : Type*} {px : ιX → Prop} {py : ιY → Prop}
{sx : ιX → Set X} {sy : ιY → Set Y} {x : X} {y : Y} (hx : (𝓝 x).HasBasis px sx)
(hy : (𝓝 y).HasBasis py sy) :
(𝓝 (x, y)).HasBasis (fun i : ιX × ιY => px i.1 ∧ py i.2) fun i => sx i.1 ×ˢ sy i.2 := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
exact hx.prod hy
#align filter.has_basis.prod_nhds Filter.HasBasis.prod_nhds
-- Porting note: moved up
theorem Filter.HasBasis.prod_nhds' {ιX ιY : Type*} {pX : ιX → Prop} {pY : ιY → Prop}
{sx : ιX → Set X} {sy : ιY → Set Y} {p : X × Y} (hx : (𝓝 p.1).HasBasis pX sx)
(hy : (𝓝 p.2).HasBasis pY sy) :
(𝓝 p).HasBasis (fun i : ιX × ιY => pX i.1 ∧ pY i.2) fun i => sx i.1 ×ˢ sy i.2 :=
hx.prod_nhds hy
#align filter.has_basis.prod_nhds' Filter.HasBasis.prod_nhds'
theorem mem_nhds_prod_iff' {x : X} {y : Y} {s : Set (X × Y)} :
s ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) ↔ ∃ u v, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ IsOpen v ∧ y ∈ v ∧ u ×ˢ v ⊆ s :=
((nhds_basis_opens x).prod_nhds (nhds_basis_opens y)).mem_iff.trans <| by
simp only [Prod.exists, and_comm, and_assoc, and_left_comm]
#align mem_nhds_prod_iff' mem_nhds_prod_iff'
theorem Prod.tendsto_iff {X} (seq : X → Y × Z) {f : Filter X} (p : Y × Z) :
Tendsto seq f (𝓝 p) ↔
Tendsto (fun n => (seq n).fst) f (𝓝 p.fst) ∧ Tendsto (fun n => (seq n).snd) f (𝓝 p.snd) := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq, Filter.tendsto_prod_iff']
#align prod.tendsto_iff Prod.tendsto_iff
instance [DiscreteTopology X] [DiscreteTopology Y] : DiscreteTopology (X × Y) :=
discreteTopology_iff_nhds.2 fun (a, b) => by
rw [nhds_prod_eq, nhds_discrete X, nhds_discrete Y, prod_pure_pure]
theorem prod_mem_nhds_iff {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} {x : X} {y : Y} :
s ×ˢ t ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) ↔ s ∈ 𝓝 x ∧ t ∈ 𝓝 y := by rw [nhds_prod_eq, prod_mem_prod_iff]
#align prod_mem_nhds_iff prod_mem_nhds_iff
theorem prod_mem_nhds {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} {x : X} {y : Y} (hx : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (hy : t ∈ 𝓝 y) :
s ×ˢ t ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) :=
prod_mem_nhds_iff.2 ⟨hx, hy⟩
#align prod_mem_nhds prod_mem_nhds
theorem isOpen_setOf_disjoint_nhds_nhds : IsOpen { p : X × X | Disjoint (𝓝 p.1) (𝓝 p.2) } := by
simp only [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, Prod.forall, mem_setOf_eq]
intro x y h
obtain ⟨U, hU, V, hV, hd⟩ := ((nhds_basis_opens x).disjoint_iff (nhds_basis_opens y)).mp h
exact mem_nhds_prod_iff'.mpr ⟨U, V, hU.2, hU.1, hV.2, hV.1, fun ⟨x', y'⟩ ⟨hx', hy'⟩ =>
disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem hd (hU.2.mem_nhds hx') (hV.2.mem_nhds hy')⟩
#align is_open_set_of_disjoint_nhds_nhds isOpen_setOf_disjoint_nhds_nhds
theorem Filter.Eventually.prod_nhds {p : X → Prop} {q : Y → Prop} {x : X} {y : Y}
(hx : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, p x) (hy : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 y, q y) : ∀ᶠ z : X × Y in 𝓝 (x, y), p z.1 ∧ q z.2 :=
prod_mem_nhds hx hy
#align filter.eventually.prod_nhds Filter.Eventually.prod_nhds
theorem nhds_swap (x : X) (y : Y) : 𝓝 (x, y) = (𝓝 (y, x)).map Prod.swap := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq, Filter.prod_comm, nhds_prod_eq]; rfl
#align nhds_swap nhds_swap
theorem Filter.Tendsto.prod_mk_nhds {γ} {x : X} {y : Y} {f : Filter γ} {mx : γ → X} {my : γ → Y}
(hx : Tendsto mx f (𝓝 x)) (hy : Tendsto my f (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (fun c => (mx c, my c)) f (𝓝 (x, y)) := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]; exact Filter.Tendsto.prod_mk hx hy
#align filter.tendsto.prod_mk_nhds Filter.Tendsto.prod_mk_nhds
theorem Filter.Eventually.curry_nhds {p : X × Y → Prop} {x : X} {y : Y}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 (x, y), p x) : ∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝 x, ∀ᶠ y' in 𝓝 y, p (x', y') := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq] at h
exact h.curry
#align filter.eventually.curry_nhds Filter.Eventually.curry_nhds
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousAt.prod {f : X → Y} {g : X → Z} {x : X} (hf : ContinuousAt f x)
(hg : ContinuousAt g x) : ContinuousAt (fun x => (f x, g x)) x :=
hf.prod_mk_nhds hg
#align continuous_at.prod ContinuousAt.prod
theorem ContinuousAt.prod_map {f : X → Z} {g : Y → W} {p : X × Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f p.fst)
(hg : ContinuousAt g p.snd) : ContinuousAt (fun p : X × Y => (f p.1, g p.2)) p :=
hf.fst''.prod hg.snd''
#align continuous_at.prod_map ContinuousAt.prod_map
theorem ContinuousAt.prod_map' {f : X → Z} {g : Y → W} {x : X} {y : Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f x)
(hg : ContinuousAt g y) : ContinuousAt (fun p : X × Y => (f p.1, g p.2)) (x, y) :=
hf.fst'.prod hg.snd'
#align continuous_at.prod_map' ContinuousAt.prod_map'
theorem ContinuousAt.comp₂ {f : Y × Z → W} {g : X → Y} {h : X → Z} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f (g x, h x)) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) (hh : ContinuousAt h x) :
ContinuousAt (fun x ↦ f (g x, h x)) x :=
ContinuousAt.comp hf (hg.prod hh)
theorem ContinuousAt.comp₂_of_eq {f : Y × Z → W} {g : X → Y} {h : X → Z} {x : X} {y : Y × Z}
(hf : ContinuousAt f y) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) (hh : ContinuousAt h x) (e : (g x, h x) = y) :
ContinuousAt (fun x ↦ f (g x, h x)) x := by
rw [← e] at hf
exact hf.comp₂ hg hh
theorem Continuous.curry_left {f : X × Y → Z} (hf : Continuous f) {y : Y} :
Continuous fun x ↦ f (x, y) :=
hf.comp (continuous_id.prod_mk continuous_const)
alias Continuous.along_fst := Continuous.curry_left
theorem Continuous.curry_right {f : X × Y → Z} (hf : Continuous f) {x : X} :
Continuous fun y ↦ f (x, y) :=
hf.comp (continuous_const.prod_mk continuous_id)
alias Continuous.along_snd := Continuous.curry_right
-- todo: prove a version of `generateFrom_union` with `image2 (∩) s t` in the LHS and use it here
theorem prod_generateFrom_generateFrom_eq {X Y : Type*} {s : Set (Set X)} {t : Set (Set Y)}
(hs : ⋃₀ s = univ) (ht : ⋃₀ t = univ) :
@instTopologicalSpaceProd X Y (generateFrom s) (generateFrom t) =
generateFrom (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) s t) :=
let G := generateFrom (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) s t)
le_antisymm
(le_generateFrom fun g ⟨u, hu, v, hv, g_eq⟩ =>
g_eq.symm ▸
@IsOpen.prod _ _ (generateFrom s) (generateFrom t) _ _ (GenerateOpen.basic _ hu)
(GenerateOpen.basic _ hv))
(le_inf
(coinduced_le_iff_le_induced.mp <|
le_generateFrom fun u hu =>
have : ⋃ v ∈ t, u ×ˢ v = Prod.fst ⁻¹' u := by
simp_rw [← prod_iUnion, ← sUnion_eq_biUnion, ht, prod_univ]
show G.IsOpen (Prod.fst ⁻¹' u) by
rw [← this]
exact
isOpen_iUnion fun v =>
isOpen_iUnion fun hv => GenerateOpen.basic _ ⟨_, hu, _, hv, rfl⟩)
(coinduced_le_iff_le_induced.mp <|
le_generateFrom fun v hv =>
have : ⋃ u ∈ s, u ×ˢ v = Prod.snd ⁻¹' v := by
simp_rw [← iUnion_prod_const, ← sUnion_eq_biUnion, hs, univ_prod]
show G.IsOpen (Prod.snd ⁻¹' v) by
rw [← this]
exact
isOpen_iUnion fun u =>
isOpen_iUnion fun hu => GenerateOpen.basic _ ⟨_, hu, _, hv, rfl⟩))
#align prod_generate_from_generate_from_eq prod_generateFrom_generateFrom_eq
-- todo: use the previous lemma?
theorem prod_eq_generateFrom :
instTopologicalSpaceProd =
generateFrom { g | ∃ (s : Set X) (t : Set Y), IsOpen s ∧ IsOpen t ∧ g = s ×ˢ t } :=
le_antisymm (le_generateFrom fun g ⟨s, t, hs, ht, g_eq⟩ => g_eq.symm ▸ hs.prod ht)
(le_inf
(forall_mem_image.2 fun t ht =>
GenerateOpen.basic _ ⟨t, univ, by simpa [Set.prod_eq] using ht⟩)
(forall_mem_image.2 fun t ht =>
GenerateOpen.basic _ ⟨univ, t, by simpa [Set.prod_eq] using ht⟩))
#align prod_eq_generate_from prod_eq_generateFrom
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: align with `mem_nhds_prod_iff'`
theorem isOpen_prod_iff {s : Set (X × Y)} :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ a b, (a, b) ∈ s →
∃ u v, IsOpen u ∧ IsOpen v ∧ a ∈ u ∧ b ∈ v ∧ u ×ˢ v ⊆ s :=
isOpen_iff_mem_nhds.trans <| by simp_rw [Prod.forall, mem_nhds_prod_iff', and_left_comm]
#align is_open_prod_iff isOpen_prod_iff
theorem prod_induced_induced (f : X → Y) (g : Z → W) :
@instTopologicalSpaceProd X Z (induced f ‹_›) (induced g ‹_›) =
induced (fun p => (f p.1, g p.2)) instTopologicalSpaceProd := by
delta instTopologicalSpaceProd
simp_rw [induced_inf, induced_compose]
rfl
#align prod_induced_induced prod_induced_induced
#noalign continuous_uncurry_of_discrete_topology_left
theorem exists_nhds_square {s : Set (X × X)} {x : X} (hx : s ∈ 𝓝 (x, x)) :
∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ x ∈ U ∧ U ×ˢ U ⊆ s := by
simpa [nhds_prod_eq, (nhds_basis_opens x).prod_self.mem_iff, and_assoc, and_left_comm] using hx
#align exists_nhds_square exists_nhds_square
theorem map_fst_nhdsWithin (x : X × Y) : map Prod.fst (𝓝[Prod.snd ⁻¹' {x.2}] x) = 𝓝 x.1 := by
refine le_antisymm (continuousAt_fst.mono_left inf_le_left) fun s hs => ?_
rcases x with ⟨x, y⟩
rw [mem_map, nhdsWithin, mem_inf_principal, mem_nhds_prod_iff] at hs
rcases hs with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, H⟩
simp only [prod_subset_iff, mem_singleton_iff, mem_setOf_eq, mem_preimage] at H
exact mem_of_superset hu fun z hz => H _ hz _ (mem_of_mem_nhds hv) rfl
#align map_fst_nhds_within map_fst_nhdsWithin
@[simp]
theorem map_fst_nhds (x : X × Y) : map Prod.fst (𝓝 x) = 𝓝 x.1 :=
le_antisymm continuousAt_fst <| (map_fst_nhdsWithin x).symm.trans_le (map_mono inf_le_left)
#align map_fst_nhds map_fst_nhds
theorem isOpenMap_fst : IsOpenMap (@Prod.fst X Y) :=
isOpenMap_iff_nhds_le.2 fun x => (map_fst_nhds x).ge
#align is_open_map_fst isOpenMap_fst
theorem map_snd_nhdsWithin (x : X × Y) : map Prod.snd (𝓝[Prod.fst ⁻¹' {x.1}] x) = 𝓝 x.2 := by
refine le_antisymm (continuousAt_snd.mono_left inf_le_left) fun s hs => ?_
rcases x with ⟨x, y⟩
rw [mem_map, nhdsWithin, mem_inf_principal, mem_nhds_prod_iff] at hs
rcases hs with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, H⟩
simp only [prod_subset_iff, mem_singleton_iff, mem_setOf_eq, mem_preimage] at H
exact mem_of_superset hv fun z hz => H _ (mem_of_mem_nhds hu) _ hz rfl
#align map_snd_nhds_within map_snd_nhdsWithin
@[simp]
theorem map_snd_nhds (x : X × Y) : map Prod.snd (𝓝 x) = 𝓝 x.2 :=
le_antisymm continuousAt_snd <| (map_snd_nhdsWithin x).symm.trans_le (map_mono inf_le_left)
#align map_snd_nhds map_snd_nhds
theorem isOpenMap_snd : IsOpenMap (@Prod.snd X Y) :=
isOpenMap_iff_nhds_le.2 fun x => (map_snd_nhds x).ge
#align is_open_map_snd isOpenMap_snd
theorem isOpen_prod_iff' {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} :
IsOpen (s ×ˢ t) ↔ IsOpen s ∧ IsOpen t ∨ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
rcases (s ×ˢ t).eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· simp [h, prod_eq_empty_iff.1 h]
· have st : s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty := prod_nonempty_iff.1 h
constructor
· intro (H : IsOpen (s ×ˢ t))
refine Or.inl ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· show IsOpen s
rw [← fst_image_prod s st.2]
exact isOpenMap_fst _ H
· show IsOpen t
rw [← snd_image_prod st.1 t]
exact isOpenMap_snd _ H
· intro H
simp only [st.1.ne_empty, st.2.ne_empty, not_false_iff, or_false_iff] at H
exact H.1.prod H.2
#align is_open_prod_iff' isOpen_prod_iff'
theorem closure_prod_eq {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} : closure (s ×ˢ t) = closure s ×ˢ closure t :=
ext fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by
simp_rw [mem_prod, mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot, nhdsWithin_prod_eq, prod_neBot]
#align closure_prod_eq closure_prod_eq
theorem interior_prod_eq (s : Set X) (t : Set Y) : interior (s ×ˢ t) = interior s ×ˢ interior t :=
ext fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by simp only [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, mem_prod, prod_mem_nhds_iff]
#align interior_prod_eq interior_prod_eq
theorem frontier_prod_eq (s : Set X) (t : Set Y) :
frontier (s ×ˢ t) = closure s ×ˢ frontier t ∪ frontier s ×ˢ closure t := by
simp only [frontier, closure_prod_eq, interior_prod_eq, prod_diff_prod]
#align frontier_prod_eq frontier_prod_eq
@[simp]
theorem frontier_prod_univ_eq (s : Set X) :
frontier (s ×ˢ (univ : Set Y)) = frontier s ×ˢ univ := by
simp [frontier_prod_eq]
#align frontier_prod_univ_eq frontier_prod_univ_eq
@[simp]
theorem frontier_univ_prod_eq (s : Set Y) :
frontier ((univ : Set X) ×ˢ s) = univ ×ˢ frontier s := by
simp [frontier_prod_eq]
#align frontier_univ_prod_eq frontier_univ_prod_eq
theorem map_mem_closure₂ {f : X → Y → Z} {x : X} {y : Y} {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} {u : Set Z}
(hf : Continuous (uncurry f)) (hx : x ∈ closure s) (hy : y ∈ closure t)
(h : ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, f a b ∈ u) : f x y ∈ closure u :=
have H₁ : (x, y) ∈ closure (s ×ˢ t) := by simpa only [closure_prod_eq] using mk_mem_prod hx hy
have H₂ : MapsTo (uncurry f) (s ×ˢ t) u := forall_prod_set.2 h
H₂.closure hf H₁
#align map_mem_closure₂ map_mem_closure₂
theorem IsClosed.prod {s₁ : Set X} {s₂ : Set Y} (h₁ : IsClosed s₁) (h₂ : IsClosed s₂) :
IsClosed (s₁ ×ˢ s₂) :=
closure_eq_iff_isClosed.mp <| by simp only [h₁.closure_eq, h₂.closure_eq, closure_prod_eq]
#align is_closed.prod IsClosed.prod
theorem Dense.prod {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (hs : Dense s) (ht : Dense t) : Dense (s ×ˢ t) :=
fun x => by
rw [closure_prod_eq]
exact ⟨hs x.1, ht x.2⟩
#align dense.prod Dense.prod
theorem DenseRange.prod_map {ι : Type*} {κ : Type*} {f : ι → Y} {g : κ → Z} (hf : DenseRange f)
(hg : DenseRange g) : DenseRange (Prod.map f g) := by
simpa only [DenseRange, prod_range_range_eq] using hf.prod hg
#align dense_range.prod_map DenseRange.prod_map
theorem Inducing.prod_map {f : X → Y} {g : Z → W} (hf : Inducing f) (hg : Inducing g) :
Inducing (Prod.map f g) :=
inducing_iff_nhds.2 fun (x, z) => by simp_rw [Prod.map_def, nhds_prod_eq, hf.nhds_eq_comap,
hg.nhds_eq_comap, prod_comap_comap_eq]
#align inducing.prod_mk Inducing.prod_map
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Topology/Constructions.lean | 872 | 874 | theorem inducing_const_prod {x : X} {f : Y → Z} : (Inducing fun x' => (x, f x')) ↔ Inducing f := by |
simp_rw [inducing_iff, instTopologicalSpaceProd, induced_inf, induced_compose, Function.comp,
induced_const, top_inf_eq]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.RingDivision
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.FractionRing
#align_import data.polynomial.ring_division from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8efcf8022aac8e01df8d302dcebdbc25d6a886c8"
noncomputable section
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] {p q : R[X]}
section Roots
open Multiset Finset
noncomputable def roots (p : R[X]) : Multiset R :=
haveI := Classical.decEq R
haveI := Classical.dec (p = 0)
if h : p = 0 then ∅ else Classical.choose (exists_multiset_roots h)
#align polynomial.roots Polynomial.roots
theorem roots_def [DecidableEq R] (p : R[X]) [Decidable (p = 0)] :
p.roots = if h : p = 0 then ∅ else Classical.choose (exists_multiset_roots h) := by
-- porting noteL `‹_›` doesn't work for instance arguments
rename_i iR ip0
obtain rfl := Subsingleton.elim iR (Classical.decEq R)
obtain rfl := Subsingleton.elim ip0 (Classical.dec (p = 0))
rfl
#align polynomial.roots_def Polynomial.roots_def
@[simp]
theorem roots_zero : (0 : R[X]).roots = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
#align polynomial.roots_zero Polynomial.roots_zero
theorem card_roots (hp0 : p ≠ 0) : (Multiset.card (roots p) : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree p := by
classical
unfold roots
rw [dif_neg hp0]
exact (Classical.choose_spec (exists_multiset_roots hp0)).1
#align polynomial.card_roots Polynomial.card_roots
theorem card_roots' (p : R[X]) : Multiset.card p.roots ≤ natDegree p := by
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· simp [hp0]
exact WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 (le_trans (card_roots hp0) (le_of_eq <| degree_eq_natDegree hp0))
#align polynomial.card_roots' Polynomial.card_roots'
theorem card_roots_sub_C {p : R[X]} {a : R} (hp0 : 0 < degree p) :
(Multiset.card (p - C a).roots : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree p :=
calc
(Multiset.card (p - C a).roots : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree (p - C a) :=
card_roots <| mt sub_eq_zero.1 fun h => not_le_of_gt hp0 <| h.symm ▸ degree_C_le
_ = degree p := by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← C_neg]; exact degree_add_C hp0
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.card_roots_sub_C Polynomial.card_roots_sub_C
theorem card_roots_sub_C' {p : R[X]} {a : R} (hp0 : 0 < degree p) :
Multiset.card (p - C a).roots ≤ natDegree p :=
WithBot.coe_le_coe.1
(le_trans (card_roots_sub_C hp0)
(le_of_eq <| degree_eq_natDegree fun h => by simp_all [lt_irrefl]))
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.card_roots_sub_C' Polynomial.card_roots_sub_C'
@[simp]
theorem count_roots [DecidableEq R] (p : R[X]) : p.roots.count a = rootMultiplicity a p := by
classical
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
rw [roots_def, dif_neg hp]
exact (Classical.choose_spec (exists_multiset_roots hp)).2 a
#align polynomial.count_roots Polynomial.count_roots
@[simp]
theorem mem_roots' : a ∈ p.roots ↔ p ≠ 0 ∧ IsRoot p a := by
classical
rw [← count_pos, count_roots p, rootMultiplicity_pos']
#align polynomial.mem_roots' Polynomial.mem_roots'
theorem mem_roots (hp : p ≠ 0) : a ∈ p.roots ↔ IsRoot p a :=
mem_roots'.trans <| and_iff_right hp
#align polynomial.mem_roots Polynomial.mem_roots
theorem ne_zero_of_mem_roots (h : a ∈ p.roots) : p ≠ 0 :=
(mem_roots'.1 h).1
#align polynomial.ne_zero_of_mem_roots Polynomial.ne_zero_of_mem_roots
theorem isRoot_of_mem_roots (h : a ∈ p.roots) : IsRoot p a :=
(mem_roots'.1 h).2
#align polynomial.is_root_of_mem_roots Polynomial.isRoot_of_mem_roots
-- Porting note: added during port.
lemma mem_roots_iff_aeval_eq_zero {x : R} (w : p ≠ 0) : x ∈ roots p ↔ aeval x p = 0 := by
rw [mem_roots w, IsRoot.def, aeval_def, eval₂_eq_eval_map]
simp
theorem card_le_degree_of_subset_roots {p : R[X]} {Z : Finset R} (h : Z.val ⊆ p.roots) :
Z.card ≤ p.natDegree :=
(Multiset.card_le_card (Finset.val_le_iff_val_subset.2 h)).trans (Polynomial.card_roots' p)
#align polynomial.card_le_degree_of_subset_roots Polynomial.card_le_degree_of_subset_roots
theorem finite_setOf_isRoot {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) : Set.Finite { x | IsRoot p x } := by
classical
simpa only [← Finset.setOf_mem, Multiset.mem_toFinset, mem_roots hp]
using p.roots.toFinset.finite_toSet
#align polynomial.finite_set_of_is_root Polynomial.finite_setOf_isRoot
theorem eq_zero_of_infinite_isRoot (p : R[X]) (h : Set.Infinite { x | IsRoot p x }) : p = 0 :=
not_imp_comm.mp finite_setOf_isRoot h
#align polynomial.eq_zero_of_infinite_is_root Polynomial.eq_zero_of_infinite_isRoot
theorem exists_max_root [LinearOrder R] (p : R[X]) (hp : p ≠ 0) : ∃ x₀, ∀ x, p.IsRoot x → x ≤ x₀ :=
Set.exists_upper_bound_image _ _ <| finite_setOf_isRoot hp
#align polynomial.exists_max_root Polynomial.exists_max_root
theorem exists_min_root [LinearOrder R] (p : R[X]) (hp : p ≠ 0) : ∃ x₀, ∀ x, p.IsRoot x → x₀ ≤ x :=
Set.exists_lower_bound_image _ _ <| finite_setOf_isRoot hp
#align polynomial.exists_min_root Polynomial.exists_min_root
theorem eq_of_infinite_eval_eq (p q : R[X]) (h : Set.Infinite { x | eval x p = eval x q }) :
p = q := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
apply eq_zero_of_infinite_isRoot
simpa only [IsRoot, eval_sub, sub_eq_zero]
#align polynomial.eq_of_infinite_eval_eq Polynomial.eq_of_infinite_eval_eq
theorem roots_mul {p q : R[X]} (hpq : p * q ≠ 0) : (p * q).roots = p.roots + q.roots := by
classical
exact Multiset.ext.mpr fun r => by
rw [count_add, count_roots, count_roots, count_roots, rootMultiplicity_mul hpq]
#align polynomial.roots_mul Polynomial.roots_mul
theorem roots.le_of_dvd (h : q ≠ 0) : p ∣ q → roots p ≤ roots q := by
rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
exact Multiset.le_iff_exists_add.mpr ⟨k.roots, roots_mul h⟩
#align polynomial.roots.le_of_dvd Polynomial.roots.le_of_dvd
theorem mem_roots_sub_C' {p : R[X]} {a x : R} : x ∈ (p - C a).roots ↔ p ≠ C a ∧ p.eval x = a := by
rw [mem_roots', IsRoot.def, sub_ne_zero, eval_sub, sub_eq_zero, eval_C]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.mem_roots_sub_C' Polynomial.mem_roots_sub_C'
theorem mem_roots_sub_C {p : R[X]} {a x : R} (hp0 : 0 < degree p) :
x ∈ (p - C a).roots ↔ p.eval x = a :=
mem_roots_sub_C'.trans <| and_iff_right fun hp => hp0.not_le <| hp.symm ▸ degree_C_le
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.mem_roots_sub_C Polynomial.mem_roots_sub_C
@[simp]
theorem roots_X_sub_C (r : R) : roots (X - C r) = {r} := by
classical
ext s
rw [count_roots, rootMultiplicity_X_sub_C, count_singleton]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.roots_X_sub_C Polynomial.roots_X_sub_C
@[simp]
theorem roots_X : roots (X : R[X]) = {0} := by rw [← roots_X_sub_C, C_0, sub_zero]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.roots_X Polynomial.roots_X
@[simp]
theorem roots_C (x : R) : (C x).roots = 0 := by
classical exact
if H : x = 0 then by rw [H, C_0, roots_zero]
else
Multiset.ext.mpr fun r => (by
rw [count_roots, count_zero, rootMultiplicity_eq_zero (not_isRoot_C _ _ H)])
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.roots_C Polynomial.roots_C
@[simp]
theorem roots_one : (1 : R[X]).roots = ∅ :=
roots_C 1
#align polynomial.roots_one Polynomial.roots_one
@[simp]
theorem roots_C_mul (p : R[X]) (ha : a ≠ 0) : (C a * p).roots = p.roots := by
by_cases hp : p = 0 <;>
simp only [roots_mul, *, Ne, mul_eq_zero, C_eq_zero, or_self_iff, not_false_iff, roots_C,
zero_add, mul_zero]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.roots_C_mul Polynomial.roots_C_mul
@[simp]
theorem roots_smul_nonzero (p : R[X]) (ha : a ≠ 0) : (a • p).roots = p.roots := by
rw [smul_eq_C_mul, roots_C_mul _ ha]
#align polynomial.roots_smul_nonzero Polynomial.roots_smul_nonzero
@[simp]
lemma roots_neg (p : R[X]) : (-p).roots = p.roots := by
rw [← neg_one_smul R p, roots_smul_nonzero p (neg_ne_zero.mpr one_ne_zero)]
theorem roots_list_prod (L : List R[X]) :
(0 : R[X]) ∉ L → L.prod.roots = (L : Multiset R[X]).bind roots :=
List.recOn L (fun _ => roots_one) fun hd tl ih H => by
rw [List.mem_cons, not_or] at H
rw [List.prod_cons, roots_mul (mul_ne_zero (Ne.symm H.1) <| List.prod_ne_zero H.2), ←
Multiset.cons_coe, Multiset.cons_bind, ih H.2]
#align polynomial.roots_list_prod Polynomial.roots_list_prod
theorem roots_multiset_prod (m : Multiset R[X]) : (0 : R[X]) ∉ m → m.prod.roots = m.bind roots := by
rcases m with ⟨L⟩
simpa only [Multiset.prod_coe, quot_mk_to_coe''] using roots_list_prod L
#align polynomial.roots_multiset_prod Polynomial.roots_multiset_prod
theorem roots_prod {ι : Type*} (f : ι → R[X]) (s : Finset ι) :
s.prod f ≠ 0 → (s.prod f).roots = s.val.bind fun i => roots (f i) := by
rcases s with ⟨m, hm⟩
simpa [Multiset.prod_eq_zero_iff, Multiset.bind_map] using roots_multiset_prod (m.map f)
#align polynomial.roots_prod Polynomial.roots_prod
@[simp]
theorem roots_pow (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : (p ^ n).roots = n • p.roots := by
induction' n with n ihn
· rw [pow_zero, roots_one, zero_smul, empty_eq_zero]
· rcases eq_or_ne p 0 with (rfl | hp)
· rw [zero_pow n.succ_ne_zero, roots_zero, smul_zero]
· rw [pow_succ, roots_mul (mul_ne_zero (pow_ne_zero _ hp) hp), ihn, add_smul, one_smul]
#align polynomial.roots_pow Polynomial.roots_pow
theorem roots_X_pow (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n : R[X]).roots = n • ({0} : Multiset R) := by
rw [roots_pow, roots_X]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.roots_X_pow Polynomial.roots_X_pow
theorem roots_C_mul_X_pow (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) :
Polynomial.roots (C a * X ^ n) = n • ({0} : Multiset R) := by
rw [roots_C_mul _ ha, roots_X_pow]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.roots_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.roots_C_mul_X_pow
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Roots.lean | 268 | 269 | theorem roots_monomial (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) : (monomial n a).roots = n • ({0} : Multiset R) := by |
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, roots_C_mul_X_pow ha]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.BumpFunction.FiniteDimension
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ContMDiff.Atlas
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ContMDiff.NormedSpace
#align_import geometry.manifold.bump_function from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b018406ad2f2a73223a3a9e198ccae61e6f05318"
universe uE uF uH uM
variable {E : Type uE} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
{H : Type uH} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners ℝ E H) {M : Type uM} [TopologicalSpace M]
[ChartedSpace H M] [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M]
open Function Filter FiniteDimensional Set Metric
open scoped Topology Manifold Classical Filter
noncomputable section
structure SmoothBumpFunction (c : M) extends ContDiffBump (extChartAt I c c) where
closedBall_subset : closedBall (extChartAt I c c) rOut ∩ range I ⊆ (extChartAt I c).target
#align smooth_bump_function SmoothBumpFunction
namespace SmoothBumpFunction
variable {c : M} (f : SmoothBumpFunction I c) {x : M} {I}
@[coe] def toFun : M → ℝ :=
indicator (chartAt H c).source (f.toContDiffBump ∘ extChartAt I c)
#align smooth_bump_function.to_fun SmoothBumpFunction.toFun
instance : CoeFun (SmoothBumpFunction I c) fun _ => M → ℝ :=
⟨toFun⟩
theorem coe_def : ⇑f = indicator (chartAt H c).source (f.toContDiffBump ∘ extChartAt I c) :=
rfl
#align smooth_bump_function.coe_def SmoothBumpFunction.coe_def
theorem rOut_pos : 0 < f.rOut :=
f.toContDiffBump.rOut_pos
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align smooth_bump_function.R_pos SmoothBumpFunction.rOut_pos
theorem ball_subset : ball (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut ∩ range I ⊆ (extChartAt I c).target :=
Subset.trans (inter_subset_inter_left _ ball_subset_closedBall) f.closedBall_subset
#align smooth_bump_function.ball_subset SmoothBumpFunction.ball_subset
theorem ball_inter_range_eq_ball_inter_target :
ball (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut ∩ range I =
ball (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut ∩ (extChartAt I c).target :=
(subset_inter inter_subset_left f.ball_subset).antisymm <| inter_subset_inter_right _ <|
extChartAt_target_subset_range _ _
theorem eqOn_source : EqOn f (f.toContDiffBump ∘ extChartAt I c) (chartAt H c).source :=
eqOn_indicator
#align smooth_bump_function.eq_on_source SmoothBumpFunction.eqOn_source
theorem eventuallyEq_of_mem_source (hx : x ∈ (chartAt H c).source) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f.toContDiffBump ∘ extChartAt I c :=
f.eqOn_source.eventuallyEq_of_mem <| (chartAt H c).open_source.mem_nhds hx
#align smooth_bump_function.eventually_eq_of_mem_source SmoothBumpFunction.eventuallyEq_of_mem_source
theorem one_of_dist_le (hs : x ∈ (chartAt H c).source)
(hd : dist (extChartAt I c x) (extChartAt I c c) ≤ f.rIn) : f x = 1 := by
simp only [f.eqOn_source hs, (· ∘ ·), f.one_of_mem_closedBall hd]
#align smooth_bump_function.one_of_dist_le SmoothBumpFunction.one_of_dist_le
theorem support_eq_inter_preimage :
support f = (chartAt H c).source ∩ extChartAt I c ⁻¹' ball (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut := by
rw [coe_def, support_indicator, support_comp_eq_preimage, ← extChartAt_source I,
← (extChartAt I c).symm_image_target_inter_eq', ← (extChartAt I c).symm_image_target_inter_eq',
f.support_eq]
#align smooth_bump_function.support_eq_inter_preimage SmoothBumpFunction.support_eq_inter_preimage
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/BumpFunction.lean | 119 | 121 | theorem isOpen_support : IsOpen (support f) := by |
rw [support_eq_inter_preimage]
exact isOpen_extChartAt_preimage I c isOpen_ball
|
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Multiset
#align_import data.nat.interval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1d29de43a5ba4662dd33b5cfeecfc2a27a5a8a29"
-- TODO
-- assert_not_exists Ring
open Finset Nat
variable (a b c : ℕ)
namespace Nat
instance instLocallyFiniteOrder : LocallyFiniteOrder ℕ where
finsetIcc a b := ⟨List.range' a (b + 1 - a), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩
finsetIco a b := ⟨List.range' a (b - a), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩
finsetIoc a b := ⟨List.range' (a + 1) (b - a), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩
finsetIoo a b := ⟨List.range' (a + 1) (b - a - 1), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩
finset_mem_Icc a b x := by rw [Finset.mem_mk, Multiset.mem_coe, List.mem_range'_1]; omega
finset_mem_Ico a b x := by rw [Finset.mem_mk, Multiset.mem_coe, List.mem_range'_1]; omega
finset_mem_Ioc a b x := by rw [Finset.mem_mk, Multiset.mem_coe, List.mem_range'_1]; omega
finset_mem_Ioo a b x := by rw [Finset.mem_mk, Multiset.mem_coe, List.mem_range'_1]; omega
theorem Icc_eq_range' : Icc a b = ⟨List.range' a (b + 1 - a), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩ :=
rfl
#align nat.Icc_eq_range' Nat.Icc_eq_range'
theorem Ico_eq_range' : Ico a b = ⟨List.range' a (b - a), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩ :=
rfl
#align nat.Ico_eq_range' Nat.Ico_eq_range'
theorem Ioc_eq_range' : Ioc a b = ⟨List.range' (a + 1) (b - a), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩ :=
rfl
#align nat.Ioc_eq_range' Nat.Ioc_eq_range'
theorem Ioo_eq_range' : Ioo a b = ⟨List.range' (a + 1) (b - a - 1), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩ :=
rfl
#align nat.Ioo_eq_range' Nat.Ioo_eq_range'
theorem uIcc_eq_range' :
uIcc a b = ⟨List.range' (min a b) (max a b + 1 - min a b), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩ := rfl
#align nat.uIcc_eq_range' Nat.uIcc_eq_range'
theorem Iio_eq_range : Iio = range := by
ext b x
rw [mem_Iio, mem_range]
#align nat.Iio_eq_range Nat.Iio_eq_range
@[simp]
theorem Ico_zero_eq_range : Ico 0 = range := by rw [← Nat.bot_eq_zero, ← Iio_eq_Ico, Iio_eq_range]
#align nat.Ico_zero_eq_range Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range
lemma range_eq_Icc_zero_sub_one (n : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0): range n = Icc 0 (n - 1) := by
ext b
simp_all only [mem_Icc, zero_le, true_and, mem_range]
exact lt_iff_le_pred (zero_lt_of_ne_zero hn)
theorem _root_.Finset.range_eq_Ico : range = Ico 0 :=
Ico_zero_eq_range.symm
#align finset.range_eq_Ico Finset.range_eq_Ico
@[simp]
theorem card_Icc : (Icc a b).card = b + 1 - a :=
List.length_range' _ _ _
#align nat.card_Icc Nat.card_Icc
@[simp]
theorem card_Ico : (Ico a b).card = b - a :=
List.length_range' _ _ _
#align nat.card_Ico Nat.card_Ico
@[simp]
theorem card_Ioc : (Ioc a b).card = b - a :=
List.length_range' _ _ _
#align nat.card_Ioc Nat.card_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem card_Ioo : (Ioo a b).card = b - a - 1 :=
List.length_range' _ _ _
#align nat.card_Ioo Nat.card_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem card_uIcc : (uIcc a b).card = (b - a : ℤ).natAbs + 1 :=
(card_Icc _ _).trans $ by rw [← Int.natCast_inj, sup_eq_max, inf_eq_min, Int.ofNat_sub] <;> omega
#align nat.card_uIcc Nat.card_uIcc
@[simp]
lemma card_Iic : (Iic b).card = b + 1 := by rw [Iic_eq_Icc, card_Icc, Nat.bot_eq_zero, Nat.sub_zero]
#align nat.card_Iic Nat.card_Iic
@[simp]
theorem card_Iio : (Iio b).card = b := by rw [Iio_eq_Ico, card_Ico, Nat.bot_eq_zero, Nat.sub_zero]
#align nat.card_Iio Nat.card_Iio
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem card_fintypeIcc : Fintype.card (Set.Icc a b) = b + 1 - a := by
rw [Fintype.card_ofFinset, card_Icc]
#align nat.card_fintype_Icc Nat.card_fintypeIcc
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem card_fintypeIco : Fintype.card (Set.Ico a b) = b - a := by
rw [Fintype.card_ofFinset, card_Ico]
#align nat.card_fintype_Ico Nat.card_fintypeIco
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem card_fintypeIoc : Fintype.card (Set.Ioc a b) = b - a := by
rw [Fintype.card_ofFinset, card_Ioc]
#align nat.card_fintype_Ioc Nat.card_fintypeIoc
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem card_fintypeIoo : Fintype.card (Set.Ioo a b) = b - a - 1 := by
rw [Fintype.card_ofFinset, card_Ioo]
#align nat.card_fintype_Ioo Nat.card_fintypeIoo
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem card_fintypeIic : Fintype.card (Set.Iic b) = b + 1 := by
rw [Fintype.card_ofFinset, card_Iic]
#align nat.card_fintype_Iic Nat.card_fintypeIic
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem card_fintypeIio : Fintype.card (Set.Iio b) = b := by rw [Fintype.card_ofFinset, card_Iio]
#align nat.card_fintype_Iio Nat.card_fintypeIio
-- TODO@Yaël: Generalize all the following lemmas to `SuccOrder`
theorem Icc_succ_left : Icc a.succ b = Ioc a b := by
ext x
rw [mem_Icc, mem_Ioc, succ_le_iff]
#align nat.Icc_succ_left Nat.Icc_succ_left
theorem Ico_succ_right : Ico a b.succ = Icc a b := by
ext x
rw [mem_Ico, mem_Icc, Nat.lt_succ_iff]
#align nat.Ico_succ_right Nat.Ico_succ_right
theorem Ico_succ_left : Ico a.succ b = Ioo a b := by
ext x
rw [mem_Ico, mem_Ioo, succ_le_iff]
#align nat.Ico_succ_left Nat.Ico_succ_left
theorem Icc_pred_right {b : ℕ} (h : 0 < b) : Icc a (b - 1) = Ico a b := by
ext x
rw [mem_Icc, mem_Ico, lt_iff_le_pred h]
#align nat.Icc_pred_right Nat.Icc_pred_right
theorem Ico_succ_succ : Ico a.succ b.succ = Ioc a b := by
ext x
rw [mem_Ico, mem_Ioc, succ_le_iff, Nat.lt_succ_iff]
#align nat.Ico_succ_succ Nat.Ico_succ_succ
@[simp]
theorem Ico_succ_singleton : Ico a (a + 1) = {a} := by rw [Ico_succ_right, Icc_self]
#align nat.Ico_succ_singleton Nat.Ico_succ_singleton
@[simp]
theorem Ico_pred_singleton {a : ℕ} (h : 0 < a) : Ico (a - 1) a = {a - 1} := by
rw [← Icc_pred_right _ h, Icc_self]
#align nat.Ico_pred_singleton Nat.Ico_pred_singleton
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_succ_singleton : Ioc b (b + 1) = {b + 1} := by rw [← Nat.Icc_succ_left, Icc_self]
#align nat.Ioc_succ_singleton Nat.Ioc_succ_singleton
variable {a b c}
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Finset/Nat.lean | 188 | 189 | theorem Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico (h : a ≤ b) : Ico a (b + 1) = insert b (Ico a b) := by |
rw [Ico_succ_right, ← Ico_insert_right h]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Opposite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.ZPowers
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Membership
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.NegOnePow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Coset
#align_import algebra.periodic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"30413fc89f202a090a54d78e540963ed3de0056e"
variable {α β γ : Type*} {f g : α → β} {c c₁ c₂ x : α}
open Set
namespace Function
@[simp]
def Periodic [Add α] (f : α → β) (c : α) : Prop :=
∀ x : α, f (x + c) = f x
#align function.periodic Function.Periodic
protected theorem Periodic.funext [Add α] (h : Periodic f c) : (fun x => f (x + c)) = f :=
funext h
#align function.periodic.funext Function.Periodic.funext
protected theorem Periodic.comp [Add α] (h : Periodic f c) (g : β → γ) : Periodic (g ∘ f) c := by
simp_all
#align function.periodic.comp Function.Periodic.comp
theorem Periodic.comp_addHom [Add α] [Add γ] (h : Periodic f c) (g : AddHom γ α) (g_inv : α → γ)
(hg : RightInverse g_inv g) : Periodic (f ∘ g) (g_inv c) := fun x => by
simp only [hg c, h (g x), map_add, comp_apply]
#align function.periodic.comp_add_hom Function.Periodic.comp_addHom
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Periodic.mul [Add α] [Mul β] (hf : Periodic f c) (hg : Periodic g c) :
Periodic (f * g) c := by simp_all
#align function.periodic.mul Function.Periodic.mul
#align function.periodic.add Function.Periodic.add
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Periodic.div [Add α] [Div β] (hf : Periodic f c) (hg : Periodic g c) :
Periodic (f / g) c := by simp_all
#align function.periodic.div Function.Periodic.div
#align function.periodic.sub Function.Periodic.sub
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.List.periodic_prod [Add α] [Monoid β] (l : List (α → β))
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, Periodic f c) : Periodic l.prod c := by
induction' l with g l ih hl
· simp
· rw [List.forall_mem_cons] at hl
simpa only [List.prod_cons] using hl.1.mul (ih hl.2)
#align list.periodic_prod List.periodic_prod
#align list.periodic_sum List.periodic_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Multiset.periodic_prod [Add α] [CommMonoid β] (s : Multiset (α → β))
(hs : ∀ f ∈ s, Periodic f c) : Periodic s.prod c :=
(s.prod_toList ▸ s.toList.periodic_prod) fun f hf => hs f <| Multiset.mem_toList.mp hf
#align multiset.periodic_prod Multiset.periodic_prod
#align multiset.periodic_sum Multiset.periodic_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Finset.periodic_prod [Add α] [CommMonoid β] {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α → β}
(s : Finset ι) (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, Periodic (f i) c) : Periodic (∏ i ∈ s, f i) c :=
s.prod_to_list f ▸ (s.toList.map f).periodic_prod (by simpa [-Periodic] )
#align finset.periodic_prod Finset.periodic_prod
#align finset.periodic_sum Finset.periodic_sum
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Periodic.smul [Add α] [SMul γ β] (h : Periodic f c) (a : γ) :
Periodic (a • f) c := by simp_all
#align function.periodic.smul Function.Periodic.smul
#align function.periodic.vadd Function.Periodic.vadd
protected theorem Periodic.const_smul [AddMonoid α] [Group γ] [DistribMulAction γ α]
(h : Periodic f c) (a : γ) : Periodic (fun x => f (a • x)) (a⁻¹ • c) := fun x => by
simpa only [smul_add, smul_inv_smul] using h (a • x)
#align function.periodic.const_smul Function.Periodic.const_smul
protected theorem Periodic.const_smul₀ [AddCommMonoid α] [DivisionSemiring γ] [Module γ α]
(h : Periodic f c) (a : γ) : Periodic (fun x => f (a • x)) (a⁻¹ • c) := fun x => by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· simp only [ha, zero_smul]
· simpa only [smul_add, smul_inv_smul₀ ha] using h (a • x)
#align function.periodic.const_smul₀ Function.Periodic.const_smul₀
protected theorem Periodic.const_mul [DivisionSemiring α] (h : Periodic f c) (a : α) :
Periodic (fun x => f (a * x)) (a⁻¹ * c) :=
Periodic.const_smul₀ h a
#align function.periodic.const_mul Function.Periodic.const_mul
theorem Periodic.const_inv_smul [AddMonoid α] [Group γ] [DistribMulAction γ α] (h : Periodic f c)
(a : γ) : Periodic (fun x => f (a⁻¹ • x)) (a • c) := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using h.const_smul a⁻¹
#align function.periodic.const_inv_smul Function.Periodic.const_inv_smul
theorem Periodic.const_inv_smul₀ [AddCommMonoid α] [DivisionSemiring γ] [Module γ α]
(h : Periodic f c) (a : γ) : Periodic (fun x => f (a⁻¹ • x)) (a • c) := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using h.const_smul₀ a⁻¹
#align function.periodic.const_inv_smul₀ Function.Periodic.const_inv_smul₀
theorem Periodic.const_inv_mul [DivisionSemiring α] (h : Periodic f c) (a : α) :
Periodic (fun x => f (a⁻¹ * x)) (a * c) :=
h.const_inv_smul₀ a
#align function.periodic.const_inv_mul Function.Periodic.const_inv_mul
theorem Periodic.mul_const [DivisionSemiring α] (h : Periodic f c) (a : α) :
Periodic (fun x => f (x * a)) (c * a⁻¹) :=
h.const_smul₀ (MulOpposite.op a)
#align function.periodic.mul_const Function.Periodic.mul_const
theorem Periodic.mul_const' [DivisionSemiring α] (h : Periodic f c) (a : α) :
Periodic (fun x => f (x * a)) (c / a) := by simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using h.mul_const a
#align function.periodic.mul_const' Function.Periodic.mul_const'
theorem Periodic.mul_const_inv [DivisionSemiring α] (h : Periodic f c) (a : α) :
Periodic (fun x => f (x * a⁻¹)) (c * a) :=
h.const_inv_smul₀ (MulOpposite.op a)
#align function.periodic.mul_const_inv Function.Periodic.mul_const_inv
theorem Periodic.div_const [DivisionSemiring α] (h : Periodic f c) (a : α) :
Periodic (fun x => f (x / a)) (c * a) := by simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using h.mul_const_inv a
#align function.periodic.div_const Function.Periodic.div_const
theorem Periodic.add_period [AddSemigroup α] (h1 : Periodic f c₁) (h2 : Periodic f c₂) :
Periodic f (c₁ + c₂) := by simp_all [← add_assoc]
#align function.periodic.add_period Function.Periodic.add_period
theorem Periodic.sub_eq [AddGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (x : α) : f (x - c) = f x := by
simpa only [sub_add_cancel] using (h (x - c)).symm
#align function.periodic.sub_eq Function.Periodic.sub_eq
theorem Periodic.sub_eq' [AddCommGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) : f (c - x) = f (-x) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_neg_add] using h (-x)
#align function.periodic.sub_eq' Function.Periodic.sub_eq'
protected theorem Periodic.neg [AddGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) : Periodic f (-c) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, Periodic] using h.sub_eq
#align function.periodic.neg Function.Periodic.neg
theorem Periodic.sub_period [AddGroup α] (h1 : Periodic f c₁) (h2 : Periodic f c₂) :
Periodic f (c₁ - c₂) := fun x => by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← add_assoc, h2.neg, h1]
#align function.periodic.sub_period Function.Periodic.sub_period
theorem Periodic.const_add [AddSemigroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (a : α) :
Periodic (fun x => f (a + x)) c := fun x => by simpa [add_assoc] using h (a + x)
#align function.periodic.const_add Function.Periodic.const_add
theorem Periodic.add_const [AddCommSemigroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (a : α) :
Periodic (fun x => f (x + a)) c := fun x => by
simpa only [add_right_comm] using h (x + a)
#align function.periodic.add_const Function.Periodic.add_const
theorem Periodic.const_sub [AddCommGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (a : α) :
Periodic (fun x => f (a - x)) c := fun x => by
simp only [← sub_sub, h.sub_eq]
#align function.periodic.const_sub Function.Periodic.const_sub
theorem Periodic.sub_const [AddCommGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (a : α) :
Periodic (fun x => f (x - a)) c := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h.add_const (-a)
#align function.periodic.sub_const Function.Periodic.sub_const
theorem Periodic.nsmul [AddMonoid α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℕ) : Periodic f (n • c) := by
induction n <;> simp_all [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, add_nsmul, ← add_assoc, zero_nsmul]
#align function.periodic.nsmul Function.Periodic.nsmul
theorem Periodic.nat_mul [Semiring α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℕ) : Periodic f (n * c) := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using h.nsmul n
#align function.periodic.nat_mul Function.Periodic.nat_mul
theorem Periodic.neg_nsmul [AddGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℕ) : Periodic f (-(n • c)) :=
(h.nsmul n).neg
#align function.periodic.neg_nsmul Function.Periodic.neg_nsmul
theorem Periodic.neg_nat_mul [Ring α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℕ) : Periodic f (-(n * c)) :=
(h.nat_mul n).neg
#align function.periodic.neg_nat_mul Function.Periodic.neg_nat_mul
theorem Periodic.sub_nsmul_eq [AddGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℕ) : f (x - n • c) = f x := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h.neg_nsmul n x
#align function.periodic.sub_nsmul_eq Function.Periodic.sub_nsmul_eq
theorem Periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq [Ring α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℕ) : f (x - n * c) = f x := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using h.sub_nsmul_eq n
#align function.periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq Function.Periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq
theorem Periodic.nsmul_sub_eq [AddCommGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℕ) :
f (n • c - x) = f (-x) :=
(h.nsmul n).sub_eq'
#align function.periodic.nsmul_sub_eq Function.Periodic.nsmul_sub_eq
theorem Periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq [Ring α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℕ) : f (n * c - x) = f (-x) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_neg_add] using h.nat_mul n (-x)
#align function.periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq Function.Periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq
protected theorem Periodic.zsmul [AddGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℤ) : Periodic f (n • c) := by
cases' n with n n
· simpa only [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, natCast_zsmul] using h.nsmul n
· simpa only [negSucc_zsmul] using (h.nsmul (n + 1)).neg
#align function.periodic.zsmul Function.Periodic.zsmul
protected theorem Periodic.int_mul [Ring α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℤ) : Periodic f (n * c) := by
simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using h.zsmul n
#align function.periodic.int_mul Function.Periodic.int_mul
theorem Periodic.sub_zsmul_eq [AddGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℤ) : f (x - n • c) = f x :=
(h.zsmul n).sub_eq x
#align function.periodic.sub_zsmul_eq Function.Periodic.sub_zsmul_eq
theorem Periodic.sub_int_mul_eq [Ring α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℤ) : f (x - n * c) = f x :=
(h.int_mul n).sub_eq x
#align function.periodic.sub_int_mul_eq Function.Periodic.sub_int_mul_eq
theorem Periodic.zsmul_sub_eq [AddCommGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℤ) :
f (n • c - x) = f (-x) :=
(h.zsmul _).sub_eq'
#align function.periodic.zsmul_sub_eq Function.Periodic.zsmul_sub_eq
theorem Periodic.int_mul_sub_eq [Ring α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℤ) : f (n * c - x) = f (-x) :=
(h.int_mul _).sub_eq'
#align function.periodic.int_mul_sub_eq Function.Periodic.int_mul_sub_eq
protected theorem Periodic.eq [AddZeroClass α] (h : Periodic f c) : f c = f 0 := by
simpa only [zero_add] using h 0
#align function.periodic.eq Function.Periodic.eq
protected theorem Periodic.neg_eq [AddGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) : f (-c) = f 0 :=
h.neg.eq
#align function.periodic.neg_eq Function.Periodic.neg_eq
protected theorem Periodic.nsmul_eq [AddMonoid α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℕ) : f (n • c) = f 0 :=
(h.nsmul n).eq
#align function.periodic.nsmul_eq Function.Periodic.nsmul_eq
theorem Periodic.nat_mul_eq [Semiring α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℕ) : f (n * c) = f 0 :=
(h.nat_mul n).eq
#align function.periodic.nat_mul_eq Function.Periodic.nat_mul_eq
theorem Periodic.zsmul_eq [AddGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℤ) : f (n • c) = f 0 :=
(h.zsmul n).eq
#align function.periodic.zsmul_eq Function.Periodic.zsmul_eq
theorem Periodic.int_mul_eq [Ring α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℤ) : f (n * c) = f 0 :=
(h.int_mul n).eq
#align function.periodic.int_mul_eq Function.Periodic.int_mul_eq
theorem Periodic.exists_mem_Ico₀ [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup α] [Archimedean α] (h : Periodic f c)
(hc : 0 < c) (x) : ∃ y ∈ Ico 0 c, f x = f y :=
let ⟨n, H, _⟩ := existsUnique_zsmul_near_of_pos' hc x
⟨x - n • c, H, (h.sub_zsmul_eq n).symm⟩
#align function.periodic.exists_mem_Ico₀ Function.Periodic.exists_mem_Ico₀
theorem Periodic.exists_mem_Ico [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup α] [Archimedean α] (h : Periodic f c)
(hc : 0 < c) (x a) : ∃ y ∈ Ico a (a + c), f x = f y :=
let ⟨n, H, _⟩ := existsUnique_add_zsmul_mem_Ico hc x a
⟨x + n • c, H, (h.zsmul n x).symm⟩
#align function.periodic.exists_mem_Ico Function.Periodic.exists_mem_Ico
theorem Periodic.exists_mem_Ioc [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup α] [Archimedean α] (h : Periodic f c)
(hc : 0 < c) (x a) : ∃ y ∈ Ioc a (a + c), f x = f y :=
let ⟨n, H, _⟩ := existsUnique_add_zsmul_mem_Ioc hc x a
⟨x + n • c, H, (h.zsmul n x).symm⟩
#align function.periodic.exists_mem_Ioc Function.Periodic.exists_mem_Ioc
theorem Periodic.image_Ioc [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup α] [Archimedean α] (h : Periodic f c)
(hc : 0 < c) (a : α) : f '' Ioc a (a + c) = range f :=
(image_subset_range _ _).antisymm <| range_subset_iff.2 fun x =>
let ⟨y, hy, hyx⟩ := h.exists_mem_Ioc hc x a
⟨y, hy, hyx.symm⟩
#align function.periodic.image_Ioc Function.Periodic.image_Ioc
theorem Periodic.image_Icc [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup α] [Archimedean α] (h : Periodic f c)
(hc : 0 < c) (a : α) : f '' Icc a (a + c) = range f :=
(image_subset_range _ _).antisymm <| h.image_Ioc hc a ▸ image_subset _ Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem Periodic.image_uIcc [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup α] [Archimedean α] (h : Periodic f c)
(hc : c ≠ 0) (a : α) : f '' uIcc a (a + c) = range f := by
cases hc.lt_or_lt with
| inl hc =>
rw [uIcc_of_ge (add_le_of_nonpos_right hc.le), ← h.neg.image_Icc (neg_pos.2 hc) (a + c),
add_neg_cancel_right]
| inr hc => rw [uIcc_of_le (le_add_of_nonneg_right hc.le), h.image_Icc hc]
theorem periodic_with_period_zero [AddZeroClass α] (f : α → β) : Periodic f 0 := fun x => by
rw [add_zero]
#align function.periodic_with_period_zero Function.periodic_with_period_zero
theorem Periodic.map_vadd_zmultiples [AddCommGroup α] (hf : Periodic f c)
(a : AddSubgroup.zmultiples c) (x : α) : f (a +ᵥ x) = f x := by
rcases a with ⟨_, m, rfl⟩
simp [AddSubgroup.vadd_def, add_comm _ x, hf.zsmul m x]
#align function.periodic.map_vadd_zmultiples Function.Periodic.map_vadd_zmultiples
theorem Periodic.map_vadd_multiples [AddCommMonoid α] (hf : Periodic f c)
(a : AddSubmonoid.multiples c) (x : α) : f (a +ᵥ x) = f x := by
rcases a with ⟨_, m, rfl⟩
simp [AddSubmonoid.vadd_def, add_comm _ x, hf.nsmul m x]
#align function.periodic.map_vadd_multiples Function.Periodic.map_vadd_multiples
def Periodic.lift [AddGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (x : α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples c) : β :=
Quotient.liftOn' x f fun a b h' => by
rw [QuotientAddGroup.leftRel_apply] at h'
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := h'
exact (h.zsmul k _).symm.trans (congr_arg f (add_eq_of_eq_neg_add hk))
#align function.periodic.lift Function.Periodic.lift
@[simp]
theorem Periodic.lift_coe [AddGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (a : α) :
h.lift (a : α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples c) = f a :=
rfl
#align function.periodic.lift_coe Function.Periodic.lift_coe
lemma Periodic.not_injective {R X : Type*} [AddZeroClass R] {f : R → X} {c : R}
(hf : Periodic f c) (hc : c ≠ 0) : ¬ Injective f := fun h ↦ hc <| h hf.eq
@[simp]
def Antiperiodic [Add α] [Neg β] (f : α → β) (c : α) : Prop :=
∀ x : α, f (x + c) = -f x
#align function.antiperiodic Function.Antiperiodic
protected theorem Antiperiodic.funext [Add α] [Neg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) :
(fun x => f (x + c)) = -f :=
funext h
#align function.antiperiodic.funext Function.Antiperiodic.funext
protected theorem Antiperiodic.funext' [Add α] [InvolutiveNeg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) :
(fun x => -f (x + c)) = f :=
neg_eq_iff_eq_neg.mpr h.funext
#align function.antiperiodic.funext' Function.Antiperiodic.funext'
protected theorem Antiperiodic.periodic [AddMonoid α] [InvolutiveNeg β]
(h : Antiperiodic f c) : Periodic f (2 • c) := by simp [two_nsmul, ← add_assoc, h _]
protected theorem Antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul [Semiring α] [InvolutiveNeg β]
(h : Antiperiodic f c) : Periodic f (2 * c) := nsmul_eq_mul 2 c ▸ h.periodic
#align function.antiperiodic.periodic Function.Antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
protected theorem Antiperiodic.eq [AddZeroClass α] [Neg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) : f c = -f 0 := by
simpa only [zero_add] using h 0
#align function.antiperiodic.eq Function.Antiperiodic.eq
theorem Antiperiodic.even_nsmul_periodic [AddMonoid α] [InvolutiveNeg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c)
(n : ℕ) : Periodic f ((2 * n) • c) := mul_nsmul c 2 n ▸ h.periodic.nsmul n
theorem Antiperiodic.nat_even_mul_periodic [Semiring α] [InvolutiveNeg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c)
(n : ℕ) : Periodic f (n * (2 * c)) :=
h.periodic_two_mul.nat_mul n
#align function.antiperiodic.nat_even_mul_periodic Function.Antiperiodic.nat_even_mul_periodic
theorem Antiperiodic.odd_nsmul_antiperiodic [AddMonoid α] [InvolutiveNeg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c)
(n : ℕ) : Antiperiodic f ((2 * n + 1) • c) := fun x => by
rw [add_nsmul, one_nsmul, ← add_assoc, h, h.even_nsmul_periodic]
theorem Antiperiodic.nat_odd_mul_antiperiodic [Semiring α] [InvolutiveNeg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c)
(n : ℕ) : Antiperiodic f (n * (2 * c) + c) := fun x => by
rw [← add_assoc, h, h.nat_even_mul_periodic]
#align function.antiperiodic.nat_odd_mul_antiperiodic Function.Antiperiodic.nat_odd_mul_antiperiodic
theorem Antiperiodic.even_zsmul_periodic [AddGroup α] [InvolutiveNeg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c)
(n : ℤ) : Periodic f ((2 * n) • c) := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_zsmul, two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul]
exact h.periodic.zsmul n
theorem Antiperiodic.int_even_mul_periodic [Ring α] [InvolutiveNeg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c)
(n : ℤ) : Periodic f (n * (2 * c)) :=
h.periodic_two_mul.int_mul n
#align function.antiperiodic.int_even_mul_periodic Function.Antiperiodic.int_even_mul_periodic
theorem Antiperiodic.odd_zsmul_antiperiodic [AddGroup α] [InvolutiveNeg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c)
(n : ℤ) : Antiperiodic f ((2 * n + 1) • c) := by
intro x
rw [add_zsmul, one_zsmul, ← add_assoc, h, h.even_zsmul_periodic]
theorem Antiperiodic.int_odd_mul_antiperiodic [Ring α] [InvolutiveNeg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c)
(n : ℤ) : Antiperiodic f (n * (2 * c) + c) := fun x => by
rw [← add_assoc, h, h.int_even_mul_periodic]
#align function.antiperiodic.int_odd_mul_antiperiodic Function.Antiperiodic.int_odd_mul_antiperiodic
theorem Antiperiodic.sub_eq [AddGroup α] [InvolutiveNeg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) (x : α) :
f (x - c) = -f x := by simp only [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, ← h (x - c), sub_add_cancel]
#align function.antiperiodic.sub_eq Function.Antiperiodic.sub_eq
theorem Antiperiodic.sub_eq' [AddCommGroup α] [Neg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) :
f (c - x) = -f (-x) := by simpa only [sub_eq_neg_add] using h (-x)
#align function.antiperiodic.sub_eq' Function.Antiperiodic.sub_eq'
protected theorem Antiperiodic.neg [AddGroup α] [InvolutiveNeg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) :
Antiperiodic f (-c) := by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, Antiperiodic] using h.sub_eq
#align function.antiperiodic.neg Function.Antiperiodic.neg
theorem Antiperiodic.neg_eq [AddGroup α] [InvolutiveNeg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) :
f (-c) = -f 0 := by
simpa only [zero_add] using h.neg 0
#align function.antiperiodic.neg_eq Function.Antiperiodic.neg_eq
theorem Antiperiodic.nat_mul_eq_of_eq_zero [Semiring α] [NegZeroClass β] (h : Antiperiodic f c)
(hi : f 0 = 0) : ∀ n : ℕ, f (n * c) = 0
| 0 => by rwa [Nat.cast_zero, zero_mul]
| n + 1 => by simp [add_mul, h _, Antiperiodic.nat_mul_eq_of_eq_zero h hi n]
#align function.antiperiodic.nat_mul_eq_of_eq_zero Function.Antiperiodic.nat_mul_eq_of_eq_zero
theorem Antiperiodic.int_mul_eq_of_eq_zero [Ring α] [SubtractionMonoid β] (h : Antiperiodic f c)
(hi : f 0 = 0) : ∀ n : ℤ, f (n * c) = 0
| (n : ℕ) => by rw [Int.cast_natCast, h.nat_mul_eq_of_eq_zero hi n]
| .negSucc n => by rw [Int.cast_negSucc, neg_mul, ← mul_neg, h.neg.nat_mul_eq_of_eq_zero hi]
#align function.antiperiodic.int_mul_eq_of_eq_zero Function.Antiperiodic.int_mul_eq_of_eq_zero
theorem Antiperiodic.add_zsmul_eq [AddGroup α] [AddGroup β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) (n : ℤ) :
f (x + n • c) = (n.negOnePow : ℤ) • f x := by
rcases Int.even_or_odd' n with ⟨k, rfl | rfl⟩
· rw [h.even_zsmul_periodic, Int.negOnePow_two_mul, Units.val_one, one_zsmul]
· rw [h.odd_zsmul_antiperiodic, Int.negOnePow_two_mul_add_one, Units.val_neg,
Units.val_one, neg_zsmul, one_zsmul]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Periodic.lean | 465 | 467 | theorem Antiperiodic.sub_zsmul_eq [AddGroup α] [AddGroup β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) (n : ℤ) :
f (x - n • c) = (n.negOnePow : ℤ) • f x := by |
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_zsmul, Int.negOnePow_neg] using h.add_zsmul_eq (-n)
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Int.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
import Mathlib.Data.Int.NatPrime
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
#align_import number_theory.pythagorean_triples from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e8638a0fcaf73e4500469f368ef9494e495099b3"
theorem sq_ne_two_fin_zmod_four (z : ZMod 4) : z * z ≠ 2 := by
change Fin 4 at z
fin_cases z <;> decide
#align sq_ne_two_fin_zmod_four sq_ne_two_fin_zmod_four
theorem Int.sq_ne_two_mod_four (z : ℤ) : z * z % 4 ≠ 2 := by
suffices ¬z * z % (4 : ℕ) = 2 % (4 : ℕ) by exact this
rw [← ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff']
simpa using sq_ne_two_fin_zmod_four _
#align int.sq_ne_two_mod_four Int.sq_ne_two_mod_four
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
def PythagoreanTriple (x y z : ℤ) : Prop :=
x * x + y * y = z * z
#align pythagorean_triple PythagoreanTriple
theorem pythagoreanTriple_comm {x y z : ℤ} : PythagoreanTriple x y z ↔ PythagoreanTriple y x z := by
delta PythagoreanTriple
rw [add_comm]
#align pythagorean_triple_comm pythagoreanTriple_comm
theorem PythagoreanTriple.zero : PythagoreanTriple 0 0 0 := by
simp only [PythagoreanTriple, zero_mul, zero_add]
#align pythagorean_triple.zero PythagoreanTriple.zero
namespace PythagoreanTriple
variable {x y z : ℤ} (h : PythagoreanTriple x y z)
theorem eq : x * x + y * y = z * z :=
h
#align pythagorean_triple.eq PythagoreanTriple.eq
@[symm]
theorem symm : PythagoreanTriple y x z := by rwa [pythagoreanTriple_comm]
#align pythagorean_triple.symm PythagoreanTriple.symm
theorem mul (k : ℤ) : PythagoreanTriple (k * x) (k * y) (k * z) :=
calc
k * x * (k * x) + k * y * (k * y) = k ^ 2 * (x * x + y * y) := by ring
_ = k ^ 2 * (z * z) := by rw [h.eq]
_ = k * z * (k * z) := by ring
#align pythagorean_triple.mul PythagoreanTriple.mul
theorem mul_iff (k : ℤ) (hk : k ≠ 0) :
PythagoreanTriple (k * x) (k * y) (k * z) ↔ PythagoreanTriple x y z := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => h.mul k⟩
simp only [PythagoreanTriple]
intro h
rw [← mul_left_inj' (mul_ne_zero hk hk)]
convert h using 1 <;> ring
#align pythagorean_triple.mul_iff PythagoreanTriple.mul_iff
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def IsClassified (_ : PythagoreanTriple x y z) :=
∃ k m n : ℤ,
(x = k * (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) ∧ y = k * (2 * m * n) ∨
x = k * (2 * m * n) ∧ y = k * (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2)) ∧
Int.gcd m n = 1
#align pythagorean_triple.is_classified PythagoreanTriple.IsClassified
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def IsPrimitiveClassified (_ : PythagoreanTriple x y z) :=
∃ m n : ℤ,
(x = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2 ∧ y = 2 * m * n ∨ x = 2 * m * n ∧ y = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) ∧
Int.gcd m n = 1 ∧ (m % 2 = 0 ∧ n % 2 = 1 ∨ m % 2 = 1 ∧ n % 2 = 0)
#align pythagorean_triple.is_primitive_classified PythagoreanTriple.IsPrimitiveClassified
theorem mul_isClassified (k : ℤ) (hc : h.IsClassified) : (h.mul k).IsClassified := by
obtain ⟨l, m, n, ⟨⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, co⟩⟩ := hc
· use k * l, m, n
apply And.intro _ co
left
constructor <;> ring
· use k * l, m, n
apply And.intro _ co
right
constructor <;> ring
#align pythagorean_triple.mul_is_classified PythagoreanTriple.mul_isClassified
theorem even_odd_of_coprime (hc : Int.gcd x y = 1) :
x % 2 = 0 ∧ y % 2 = 1 ∨ x % 2 = 1 ∧ y % 2 = 0 := by
cases' Int.emod_two_eq_zero_or_one x with hx hx <;>
cases' Int.emod_two_eq_zero_or_one y with hy hy
-- x even, y even
· exfalso
apply Nat.not_coprime_of_dvd_of_dvd (by decide : 1 < 2) _ _ hc
· apply Int.natCast_dvd.1
apply Int.dvd_of_emod_eq_zero hx
· apply Int.natCast_dvd.1
apply Int.dvd_of_emod_eq_zero hy
-- x even, y odd
· left
exact ⟨hx, hy⟩
-- x odd, y even
· right
exact ⟨hx, hy⟩
-- x odd, y odd
· exfalso
obtain ⟨x0, y0, rfl, rfl⟩ : ∃ x0 y0, x = x0 * 2 + 1 ∧ y = y0 * 2 + 1 := by
cases' exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd (Int.dvd_sub_of_emod_eq hx) with x0 hx2
cases' exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd (Int.dvd_sub_of_emod_eq hy) with y0 hy2
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hx2 hy2
exact ⟨x0, y0, hx2, hy2⟩
apply Int.sq_ne_two_mod_four z
rw [show z * z = 4 * (x0 * x0 + x0 + y0 * y0 + y0) + 2 by
rw [← h.eq]
ring]
simp only [Int.add_emod, Int.mul_emod_right, zero_add]
decide
#align pythagorean_triple.even_odd_of_coprime PythagoreanTriple.even_odd_of_coprime
theorem gcd_dvd : (Int.gcd x y : ℤ) ∣ z := by
by_cases h0 : Int.gcd x y = 0
· have hx : x = 0 := by
apply Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp
apply Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left h0
have hy : y = 0 := by
apply Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp
apply Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right h0
have hz : z = 0 := by
simpa only [PythagoreanTriple, hx, hy, add_zero, zero_eq_mul, mul_zero,
or_self_iff] using h
simp only [hz, dvd_zero]
obtain ⟨k, x0, y0, _, h2, rfl, rfl⟩ :
∃ (k : ℕ) (x0 y0 : _), 0 < k ∧ Int.gcd x0 y0 = 1 ∧ x = x0 * k ∧ y = y0 * k :=
Int.exists_gcd_one' (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0)
rw [Int.gcd_mul_right, h2, Int.natAbs_ofNat, one_mul]
rw [← Int.pow_dvd_pow_iff two_ne_zero, sq z, ← h.eq]
rw [(by ring : x0 * k * (x0 * k) + y0 * k * (y0 * k) = (k : ℤ) ^ 2 * (x0 * x0 + y0 * y0))]
exact dvd_mul_right _ _
#align pythagorean_triple.gcd_dvd PythagoreanTriple.gcd_dvd
theorem normalize : PythagoreanTriple (x / Int.gcd x y) (y / Int.gcd x y) (z / Int.gcd x y) := by
by_cases h0 : Int.gcd x y = 0
· have hx : x = 0 := by
apply Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp
apply Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left h0
have hy : y = 0 := by
apply Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp
apply Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right h0
have hz : z = 0 := by
simpa only [PythagoreanTriple, hx, hy, add_zero, zero_eq_mul, mul_zero,
or_self_iff] using h
simp only [hx, hy, hz, Int.zero_div]
exact zero
rcases h.gcd_dvd with ⟨z0, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨k, x0, y0, k0, h2, rfl, rfl⟩ :
∃ (k : ℕ) (x0 y0 : _), 0 < k ∧ Int.gcd x0 y0 = 1 ∧ x = x0 * k ∧ y = y0 * k :=
Int.exists_gcd_one' (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0)
have hk : (k : ℤ) ≠ 0 := by
norm_cast
rwa [pos_iff_ne_zero] at k0
rw [Int.gcd_mul_right, h2, Int.natAbs_ofNat, one_mul] at h ⊢
rw [mul_comm x0, mul_comm y0, mul_iff k hk] at h
rwa [Int.mul_ediv_cancel _ hk, Int.mul_ediv_cancel _ hk, Int.mul_ediv_cancel_left _ hk]
#align pythagorean_triple.normalize PythagoreanTriple.normalize
theorem isClassified_of_isPrimitiveClassified (hp : h.IsPrimitiveClassified) : h.IsClassified := by
obtain ⟨m, n, H⟩ := hp
use 1, m, n
rcases H with ⟨t, co, _⟩
rw [one_mul, one_mul]
exact ⟨t, co⟩
#align pythagorean_triple.is_classified_of_is_primitive_classified PythagoreanTriple.isClassified_of_isPrimitiveClassified
theorem isClassified_of_normalize_isPrimitiveClassified (hc : h.normalize.IsPrimitiveClassified) :
h.IsClassified := by
convert h.normalize.mul_isClassified (Int.gcd x y)
(isClassified_of_isPrimitiveClassified h.normalize hc) <;>
rw [Int.mul_ediv_cancel']
· exact Int.gcd_dvd_left
· exact Int.gcd_dvd_right
· exact h.gcd_dvd
#align pythagorean_triple.is_classified_of_normalize_is_primitive_classified PythagoreanTriple.isClassified_of_normalize_isPrimitiveClassified
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/PythagoreanTriples.lean | 228 | 238 | theorem ne_zero_of_coprime (hc : Int.gcd x y = 1) : z ≠ 0 := by |
suffices 0 < z * z by
rintro rfl
norm_num at this
rw [← h.eq, ← sq, ← sq]
have hc' : Int.gcd x y ≠ 0 := by
rw [hc]
exact one_ne_zero
cases' Int.ne_zero_of_gcd hc' with hxz hyz
· apply lt_add_of_pos_of_le (sq_pos_of_ne_zero hxz) (sq_nonneg y)
· apply lt_add_of_le_of_pos (sq_nonneg x) (sq_pos_of_ne_zero hyz)
|
import Mathlib.Dynamics.Ergodic.MeasurePreserving
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SimpleFunc
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.MutuallySingular
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Count
import Mathlib.Topology.IndicatorConstPointwise
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Real
#align_import measure_theory.integral.lebesgue from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c14c8fcde993801fca8946b0d80131a1a81d1520"
assert_not_exists NormedSpace
set_option autoImplicit true
noncomputable section
open Set hiding restrict restrict_apply
open Filter ENNReal
open Function (support)
open scoped Classical
open Topology NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
section Lintegral
open SimpleFunc
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ ν : Measure α}
irreducible_def lintegral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨆ (g : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) (_ : ⇑g ≤ f), g.lintegral μ
#align measure_theory.lintegral MeasureTheory.lintegral
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3 "∫⁻ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => lintegral μ r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3 "∫⁻ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => lintegral volume f) => r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3"∫⁻ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => lintegral (Measure.restrict μ s) r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3"∫⁻ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => lintegral (Measure.restrict volume s) f) => r
theorem SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = f.lintegral μ := by
rw [MeasureTheory.lintegral]
exact le_antisymm (iSup₂_le fun g hg => lintegral_mono hg <| le_rfl)
(le_iSup₂_of_le f le_rfl le_rfl)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.lintegral_eq_lintegral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral
@[mono]
theorem lintegral_mono' {m : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃μ ν : Measure α⦄ (hμν : μ ≤ ν) ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄
(hfg : f ≤ g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂ν := by
rw [lintegral, lintegral]
exact iSup_mono fun φ => iSup_mono' fun hφ => ⟨le_trans hφ hfg, lintegral_mono (le_refl φ) hμν⟩
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono'
-- workaround for the known eta-reduction issue with `@[gcongr]`
@[gcongr] theorem lintegral_mono_fn' ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄ (hfg : ∀ x, f x ≤ g x) (h2 : μ ≤ ν) :
lintegral μ f ≤ lintegral ν g :=
lintegral_mono' h2 hfg
theorem lintegral_mono ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄ (hfg : f ≤ g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' (le_refl μ) hfg
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono
-- workaround for the known eta-reduction issue with `@[gcongr]`
@[gcongr] theorem lintegral_mono_fn ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄ (hfg : ∀ x, f x ≤ g x) :
lintegral μ f ≤ lintegral μ g :=
lintegral_mono hfg
theorem lintegral_mono_nnreal {f g : α → ℝ≥0} (h : f ≤ g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono fun a => ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (h a)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_nnreal MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_nnreal
theorem iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨆ (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) (_ : Measurable g) (_ : g ≤ f), ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
apply le_antisymm
· exact iSup_le fun i => iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le fun h'i => lintegral_mono h'i
· rw [lintegral]
refine iSup₂_le fun i hi => le_iSup₂_of_le i i.measurable <| le_iSup_of_le hi ?_
exact le_of_eq (i.lintegral_eq_lintegral _).symm
#align measure_theory.supr_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral MeasureTheory.iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral
theorem lintegral_mono_set {_ : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃μ : Measure α⦄ {s t : Set α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hst : s ⊆ t) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' (Measure.restrict_mono hst (le_refl μ)) (le_refl f)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_set MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_set
theorem lintegral_mono_set' {_ : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃μ : Measure α⦄ {s t : Set α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hst : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' (Measure.restrict_mono' hst (le_refl μ)) (le_refl f)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_set' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_set'
theorem monotone_lintegral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : Monotone (lintegral μ) :=
lintegral_mono
#align measure_theory.monotone_lintegral MeasureTheory.monotone_lintegral
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_const (c : ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ _, c ∂μ = c * μ univ := by
rw [← SimpleFunc.const_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral, SimpleFunc.coe_const]
rfl
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const MeasureTheory.lintegral_const
theorem lintegral_zero : ∫⁻ _ : α, 0 ∂μ = 0 := by simp
#align measure_theory.lintegral_zero MeasureTheory.lintegral_zero
theorem lintegral_zero_fun : lintegral μ (0 : α → ℝ≥0∞) = 0 :=
lintegral_zero
#align measure_theory.lintegral_zero_fun MeasureTheory.lintegral_zero_fun
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem lintegral_one : ∫⁻ _, (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ = μ univ := by rw [lintegral_const, one_mul]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_one MeasureTheory.lintegral_one
theorem set_lintegral_const (s : Set α) (c : ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ _ in s, c ∂μ = c * μ s := by
rw [lintegral_const, Measure.restrict_apply_univ]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_const MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_const
theorem set_lintegral_one (s) : ∫⁻ _ in s, 1 ∂μ = μ s := by rw [set_lintegral_const, one_mul]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_one MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_one
theorem set_lintegral_const_lt_top [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (s : Set α) {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ _ in s, c ∂μ < ∞ := by
rw [lintegral_const]
exact ENNReal.mul_lt_top hc (measure_ne_top (μ.restrict s) univ)
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_const_lt_top MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_const_lt_top
theorem lintegral_const_lt_top [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) : ∫⁻ _, c ∂μ < ∞ := by
simpa only [Measure.restrict_univ] using set_lintegral_const_lt_top (univ : Set α) hc
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_lt_top MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_lt_top
section
variable (μ)
theorem exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∃ g : α → ℝ≥0∞, Measurable g ∧ g ≤ f ∧ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rcases eq_or_ne (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) 0 with h₀ | h₀
· exact ⟨0, measurable_zero, zero_le f, h₀.trans lintegral_zero.symm⟩
rcases exists_seq_strictMono_tendsto' h₀.bot_lt with ⟨L, _, hLf, hL_tendsto⟩
have : ∀ n, ∃ g : α → ℝ≥0∞, Measurable g ∧ g ≤ f ∧ L n < ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
intro n
simpa only [← iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral f, lt_iSup_iff, exists_prop] using
(hLf n).2
choose g hgm hgf hLg using this
refine
⟨fun x => ⨆ n, g n x, measurable_iSup hgm, fun x => iSup_le fun n => hgf n x, le_antisymm ?_ ?_⟩
· refine le_of_tendsto' hL_tendsto fun n => (hLg n).le.trans <| lintegral_mono fun x => ?_
exact le_iSup (fun n => g n x) n
· exact lintegral_mono fun x => iSup_le fun n => hgf n x
#align measure_theory.exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq MeasureTheory.exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq
end
theorem lintegral_eq_nnreal {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ =
⨆ (φ : α →ₛ ℝ≥0) (_ : ∀ x, ↑(φ x) ≤ f x), (φ.map ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞)).lintegral μ := by
rw [lintegral]
refine
le_antisymm (iSup₂_le fun φ hφ => ?_) (iSup_mono' fun φ => ⟨φ.map ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞), le_rfl⟩)
by_cases h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, φ a ≠ ∞
· let ψ := φ.map ENNReal.toNNReal
replace h : ψ.map ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) =ᵐ[μ] φ := h.mono fun a => ENNReal.coe_toNNReal
have : ∀ x, ↑(ψ x) ≤ f x := fun x => le_trans ENNReal.coe_toNNReal_le_self (hφ x)
exact
le_iSup_of_le (φ.map ENNReal.toNNReal) (le_iSup_of_le this (ge_of_eq <| lintegral_congr h))
· have h_meas : μ (φ ⁻¹' {∞}) ≠ 0 := mt measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem.1 h
refine le_trans le_top (ge_of_eq <| (iSup_eq_top _).2 fun b hb => ?_)
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n : ℕ, b < n * μ (φ ⁻¹' {∞}) := exists_nat_mul_gt h_meas (ne_of_lt hb)
use (const α (n : ℝ≥0)).restrict (φ ⁻¹' {∞})
simp only [lt_iSup_iff, exists_prop, coe_restrict, φ.measurableSet_preimage, coe_const,
ENNReal.coe_indicator, map_coe_ennreal_restrict, SimpleFunc.map_const, ENNReal.coe_natCast,
restrict_const_lintegral]
refine ⟨indicator_le fun x hx => le_trans ?_ (hφ _), hn⟩
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_singleton_iff] at hx
simp only [hx, le_top]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_nnreal MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_nnreal
theorem exists_simpleFunc_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ φ : α →ₛ ℝ≥0,
(∀ x, ↑(φ x) ≤ f x) ∧
∀ ψ : α →ₛ ℝ≥0, (∀ x, ↑(ψ x) ≤ f x) → (map (↑) (ψ - φ)).lintegral μ < ε := by
rw [lintegral_eq_nnreal] at h
have := ENNReal.lt_add_right h hε
erw [ENNReal.biSup_add] at this <;> [skip; exact ⟨0, fun x => zero_le _⟩]
simp_rw [lt_iSup_iff, iSup_lt_iff, iSup_le_iff] at this
rcases this with ⟨φ, hle : ∀ x, ↑(φ x) ≤ f x, b, hbφ, hb⟩
refine ⟨φ, hle, fun ψ hψ => ?_⟩
have : (map (↑) φ).lintegral μ ≠ ∞ := ne_top_of_le_ne_top h (by exact le_iSup₂ (α := ℝ≥0∞) φ hle)
rw [← ENNReal.add_lt_add_iff_left this, ← add_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.map_add @ENNReal.coe_add]
refine (hb _ fun x => le_trans ?_ (max_le (hle x) (hψ x))).trans_lt hbφ
norm_cast
simp only [add_apply, sub_apply, add_tsub_eq_max]
rfl
#align measure_theory.exists_simple_func_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos MeasureTheory.exists_simpleFunc_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos
theorem iSup_lintegral_le {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨆ i, ∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, ⨆ i, f i a ∂μ := by
simp only [← iSup_apply]
exact (monotone_lintegral μ).le_map_iSup
#align measure_theory.supr_lintegral_le MeasureTheory.iSup_lintegral_le
theorem iSup₂_lintegral_le {ι : Sort*} {ι' : ι → Sort*} (f : ∀ i, ι' i → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨆ (i) (j), ∫⁻ a, f i j a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, ⨆ (i) (j), f i j a ∂μ := by
convert (monotone_lintegral μ).le_map_iSup₂ f with a
simp only [iSup_apply]
#align measure_theory.supr₂_lintegral_le MeasureTheory.iSup₂_lintegral_le
theorem le_iInf_lintegral {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ i, f i a ∂μ ≤ ⨅ i, ∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ := by
simp only [← iInf_apply]
exact (monotone_lintegral μ).map_iInf_le
#align measure_theory.le_infi_lintegral MeasureTheory.le_iInf_lintegral
theorem le_iInf₂_lintegral {ι : Sort*} {ι' : ι → Sort*} (f : ∀ i, ι' i → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ (i) (h : ι' i), f i h a ∂μ ≤ ⨅ (i) (h : ι' i), ∫⁻ a, f i h a ∂μ := by
convert (monotone_lintegral μ).map_iInf₂_le f with a
simp only [iInf_apply]
#align measure_theory.le_infi₂_lintegral MeasureTheory.le_iInf₂_lintegral
theorem lintegral_mono_ae {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, f a ≤ g a) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rcases exists_measurable_superset_of_null h with ⟨t, hts, ht, ht0⟩
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∉ t := measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem.1 ht0
rw [lintegral, lintegral]
refine iSup_le fun s => iSup_le fun hfs => le_iSup_of_le (s.restrict tᶜ) <| le_iSup_of_le ?_ ?_
· intro a
by_cases h : a ∈ t <;>
simp only [restrict_apply s ht.compl, mem_compl_iff, h, not_true, not_false_eq_true,
indicator_of_not_mem, zero_le, not_false_eq_true, indicator_of_mem]
exact le_trans (hfs a) (_root_.by_contradiction fun hnfg => h (hts hnfg))
· refine le_of_eq (SimpleFunc.lintegral_congr <| this.mono fun a hnt => ?_)
by_cases hat : a ∈ t <;> simp only [restrict_apply s ht.compl, mem_compl_iff, hat, not_true,
not_false_eq_true, indicator_of_not_mem, not_false_eq_true, indicator_of_mem]
exact (hnt hat).elim
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_ae MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_ae
theorem set_lintegral_mono_ae {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono_ae <| (ae_restrict_iff <| measurableSet_le hf hg).2 hfg
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_mono_ae MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_mono_ae
theorem set_lintegral_mono {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g)
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
set_lintegral_mono_ae hf hg (ae_of_all _ hfg)
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_mono MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_mono
theorem set_lintegral_mono_ae' {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono_ae <| (ae_restrict_iff' hs).2 hfg
theorem set_lintegral_mono' {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
set_lintegral_mono_ae' hs (ae_of_all _ hfg)
theorem set_lintegral_le_lintegral (s : Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' Measure.restrict_le_self le_rfl
theorem lintegral_congr_ae {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
le_antisymm (lintegral_mono_ae <| h.le) (lintegral_mono_ae <| h.symm.le)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_congr_ae MeasureTheory.lintegral_congr_ae
theorem lintegral_congr {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
simp only [h]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_congr MeasureTheory.lintegral_congr
theorem set_lintegral_congr {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s t : Set α} (h : s =ᵐ[μ] t) :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ := by rw [Measure.restrict_congr_set h]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_congr MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_congr
theorem set_lintegral_congr_fun {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x = g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_congr_ae]
rw [EventuallyEq]
rwa [ae_restrict_iff' hs]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_congr_fun MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_congr_fun
theorem lintegral_ofReal_le_lintegral_nnnorm (f : α → ℝ) :
∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
refine lintegral_mono fun x => ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal ?_
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact le_abs_self (f x)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_of_real_le_lintegral_nnnorm MeasureTheory.lintegral_ofReal_le_lintegral_nnnorm
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (h_nonneg : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) :
∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ := by
apply lintegral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [h_nonneg] with x hx
rw [Real.nnnorm_of_nonneg hx, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal hx]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (h_nonneg : 0 ≤ f) :
∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ :=
lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg (Filter.eventually_of_forall h_nonneg)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_nonneg MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_nonneg
theorem lintegral_iSup {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ n, Measurable (f n)) (h_mono : Monotone f) :
∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
set c : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞ := (↑)
set F := fun a : α => ⨆ n, f n a
refine le_antisymm ?_ (iSup_lintegral_le _)
rw [lintegral_eq_nnreal]
refine iSup_le fun s => iSup_le fun hsf => ?_
refine ENNReal.le_of_forall_lt_one_mul_le fun a ha => ?_
rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_coe.1 ha with ⟨r, rfl, _⟩
have ha : r < 1 := ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.1 ha
let rs := s.map fun a => r * a
have eq_rs : rs.map c = (const α r : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) * map c s := rfl
have eq : ∀ p, rs.map c ⁻¹' {p} = ⋃ n, rs.map c ⁻¹' {p} ∩ { a | p ≤ f n a } := by
intro p
rw [← inter_iUnion]; nth_rw 1 [← inter_univ (map c rs ⁻¹' {p})]
refine Set.ext fun x => and_congr_right fun hx => true_iff_iff.2 ?_
by_cases p_eq : p = 0
· simp [p_eq]
simp only [coe_map, mem_preimage, Function.comp_apply, mem_singleton_iff] at hx
subst hx
have : r * s x ≠ 0 := by rwa [Ne, ← ENNReal.coe_eq_zero]
have : s x ≠ 0 := right_ne_zero_of_mul this
have : (rs.map c) x < ⨆ n : ℕ, f n x := by
refine lt_of_lt_of_le (ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.2 ?_) (hsf x)
suffices r * s x < 1 * s x by simpa
exact mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right ha (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 this)
rcases lt_iSup_iff.1 this with ⟨i, hi⟩
exact mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, le_of_lt hi⟩
have mono : ∀ r : ℝ≥0∞, Monotone fun n => rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a } := by
intro r i j h
refine inter_subset_inter_right _ ?_
simp_rw [subset_def, mem_setOf]
intro x hx
exact le_trans hx (h_mono h x)
have h_meas : ∀ n, MeasurableSet {a : α | map c rs a ≤ f n a} := fun n =>
measurableSet_le (SimpleFunc.measurable _) (hf n)
calc
(r : ℝ≥0∞) * (s.map c).lintegral μ = ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, r * μ (rs.map c ⁻¹' {r}) := by
rw [← const_mul_lintegral, eq_rs, SimpleFunc.lintegral]
_ = ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, r * μ (⋃ n, rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a }) := by
simp only [(eq _).symm]
_ = ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, ⨆ n, r * μ (rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a }) :=
(Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x _ => by
rw [measure_iUnion_eq_iSup (mono x).directed_le, ENNReal.mul_iSup])
_ = ⨆ n, ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, r * μ (rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a }) := by
refine ENNReal.finset_sum_iSup_nat fun p i j h ↦ ?_
gcongr _ * μ ?_
exact mono p h
_ ≤ ⨆ n : ℕ, ((rs.map c).restrict { a | (rs.map c) a ≤ f n a }).lintegral μ := by
gcongr with n
rw [restrict_lintegral _ (h_meas n)]
refine le_of_eq (Finset.sum_congr rfl fun r _ => ?_)
congr 2 with a
refine and_congr_right ?_
simp (config := { contextual := true })
_ ≤ ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
simp only [← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral]
gcongr with n a
simp only [map_apply] at h_meas
simp only [coe_map, restrict_apply _ (h_meas _), (· ∘ ·)]
exact indicator_apply_le id
#align measure_theory.lintegral_supr MeasureTheory.lintegral_iSup
theorem lintegral_iSup' {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ)
(h_mono : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Monotone fun n => f n x) : ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← iSup_apply]
let p : α → (ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) → Prop := fun _ f' => Monotone f'
have hp : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x fun i => f i x := h_mono
have h_ae_seq_mono : Monotone (aeSeq hf p) := by
intro n m hnm x
by_cases hx : x ∈ aeSeqSet hf p
· exact aeSeq.prop_of_mem_aeSeqSet hf hx hnm
· simp only [aeSeq, hx, if_false, le_rfl]
rw [lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.iSup hf hp).symm]
simp_rw [iSup_apply]
rw [lintegral_iSup (aeSeq.measurable hf p) h_ae_seq_mono]
congr with n
exact lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.aeSeq_n_eq_fun_n_ae hf hp n)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_supr' MeasureTheory.lintegral_iSup'
theorem lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} {F : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ) (h_mono : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Monotone fun n => f n x)
(h_tendsto : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 <| F x)) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 <| ∫⁻ x, F x ∂μ) := by
have : Monotone fun n => ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ := fun i j hij =>
lintegral_mono_ae (h_mono.mono fun x hx => hx hij)
suffices key : ∫⁻ x, F x ∂μ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ by
rw [key]
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup this
rw [← lintegral_iSup' hf h_mono]
refine lintegral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [h_mono, h_tendsto] with _ hx_mono hx_tendsto using
tendsto_nhds_unique hx_tendsto (tendsto_atTop_iSup hx_mono)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone MeasureTheory.lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone
theorem lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ :=
calc
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, (eapprox f n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
congr; ext a; rw [iSup_eapprox_apply f hf]
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, (eapprox f n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
apply lintegral_iSup
· measurability
· intro i j h
exact monotone_eapprox f h
_ = ⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ := by
congr; ext n; rw [(eapprox f n).lintegral_eq_lintegral]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_supr_eapprox_lintegral MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral
theorem exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞}
(hε : ε ≠ 0) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ s, μ s < δ → ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ < ε := by
rcases exists_between (pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr hε) with ⟨ε₂, hε₂0, hε₂ε⟩
rcases exists_between hε₂0 with ⟨ε₁, hε₁0, hε₁₂⟩
rcases exists_simpleFunc_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos h hε₁0.ne' with ⟨φ, _, hφ⟩
rcases φ.exists_forall_le with ⟨C, hC⟩
use (ε₂ - ε₁) / C, ENNReal.div_pos_iff.2 ⟨(tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hε₁₂).ne', ENNReal.coe_ne_top⟩
refine fun s hs => lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ hε₂ε
simp only [lintegral_eq_nnreal, iSup_le_iff]
intro ψ hψ
calc
(map (↑) ψ).lintegral (μ.restrict s) ≤
(map (↑) φ).lintegral (μ.restrict s) + (map (↑) (ψ - φ)).lintegral (μ.restrict s) := by
rw [← SimpleFunc.add_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.map_add @ENNReal.coe_add]
refine SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono (fun x => ?_) le_rfl
simp only [add_tsub_eq_max, le_max_right, coe_map, Function.comp_apply, SimpleFunc.coe_add,
SimpleFunc.coe_sub, Pi.add_apply, Pi.sub_apply, ENNReal.coe_max (φ x) (ψ x)]
_ ≤ (map (↑) φ).lintegral (μ.restrict s) + ε₁ := by
gcongr
refine le_trans ?_ (hφ _ hψ).le
exact SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono le_rfl Measure.restrict_le_self
_ ≤ (SimpleFunc.const α (C : ℝ≥0∞)).lintegral (μ.restrict s) + ε₁ := by
gcongr
exact SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono (fun x ↦ ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (hC x)) le_rfl
_ = C * μ s + ε₁ := by
simp only [← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral, coe_const, lintegral_const,
Measure.restrict_apply, MeasurableSet.univ, univ_inter, Function.const]
_ ≤ C * ((ε₂ - ε₁) / C) + ε₁ := by gcongr
_ ≤ ε₂ - ε₁ + ε₁ := by gcongr; apply mul_div_le
_ = ε₂ := tsub_add_cancel_of_le hε₁₂.le
#align measure_theory.exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt MeasureTheory.exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt
theorem tendsto_set_lintegral_zero {ι} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) {l : Filter ι}
{s : ι → Set α} (hl : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫⁻ x in s i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 0) := by
simp only [ENNReal.nhds_zero, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal, mem_Iio,
← pos_iff_ne_zero] at hl ⊢
intro ε ε0
rcases exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt h ε0.ne' with ⟨δ, δ0, hδ⟩
exact (hl δ δ0).mono fun i => hδ _
#align measure_theory.tendsto_set_lintegral_zero MeasureTheory.tendsto_set_lintegral_zero
theorem le_lintegral_add (f g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ := by
simp only [lintegral]
refine ENNReal.biSup_add_biSup_le' (p := fun h : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞ => h ≤ f)
(q := fun h : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞ => h ≤ g) ⟨0, zero_le f⟩ ⟨0, zero_le g⟩ fun f' hf' g' hg' => ?_
exact le_iSup₂_of_le (f' + g') (add_le_add hf' hg') (add_lintegral _ _).ge
#align measure_theory.le_lintegral_add MeasureTheory.le_lintegral_add
-- Use stronger lemmas `lintegral_add_left`/`lintegral_add_right` instead
theorem lintegral_add_aux {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
calc
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ =
∫⁻ a, (⨆ n, (eapprox f n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a) + ⨆ n, (eapprox g n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
simp only [iSup_eapprox_apply, hf, hg]
_ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, (eapprox f n + eapprox g n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
congr; funext a
rw [ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone]
· simp only [Pi.add_apply]
· intro i j h
exact monotone_eapprox _ h a
· intro i j h
exact monotone_eapprox _ h a
_ = ⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ + (eapprox g n).lintegral μ := by
rw [lintegral_iSup]
· congr
funext n
rw [← SimpleFunc.add_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral]
simp only [Pi.add_apply, SimpleFunc.coe_add]
· measurability
· intro i j h a
dsimp
gcongr <;> exact monotone_eapprox _ h _
_ = (⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ) + ⨆ n, (eapprox g n).lintegral μ := by
refine (ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone ?_ ?_).symm <;>
· intro i j h
exact SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono (monotone_eapprox _ h) le_rfl
_ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral hf, lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral hg]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_aux MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_aux
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_add_left {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_lintegral_add _ _)
rcases exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq μ fun a => f a + g a with ⟨φ, hφm, hφ_le, hφ_eq⟩
calc
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, φ a ∂μ := hφ_eq
_ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a + (φ a - f a) ∂μ := lintegral_mono fun a => le_add_tsub
_ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, φ a - f a ∂μ := lintegral_add_aux hf (hφm.sub hf)
_ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
add_le_add_left (lintegral_mono fun a => tsub_le_iff_left.2 <| hφ_le a) _
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_left MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_left
theorem lintegral_add_left' {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk, ← lintegral_add_left hf.measurable_mk,
lintegral_congr_ae (hf.ae_eq_mk.add (ae_eq_refl g))]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_left' MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_left'
theorem lintegral_add_right' (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
simpa only [add_comm] using lintegral_add_left' hg f
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_right' MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_right'
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_add_right (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : Measurable g) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_add_right' f hg.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_right MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_right
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_smul_measure (c : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂c • μ = c * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
simp only [lintegral, iSup_subtype', SimpleFunc.lintegral_smul, ENNReal.mul_iSup, smul_eq_mul]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_smul_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_smul_measure
lemma set_lintegral_smul_measure (c : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂(c • μ) = c * ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
rw [Measure.restrict_smul, lintegral_smul_measure]
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_sum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} {ι} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂Measure.sum μ = ∑' i, ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ i := by
simp only [lintegral, iSup_subtype', SimpleFunc.lintegral_sum, ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
rw [iSup_comm]
congr; funext s
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with i s hi hs
· simp
simp only [Finset.sum_insert hi, ← hs]
refine (ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup ?_).symm
intro φ ψ
exact
⟨⟨φ ⊔ ψ, fun x => sup_le (φ.2 x) (ψ.2 x)⟩,
add_le_add (SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono le_sup_left le_rfl)
(Finset.sum_le_sum fun j _ => SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono le_sup_right le_rfl)⟩
#align measure_theory.lintegral_sum_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_sum_measure
theorem hasSum_lintegral_measure {ι} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
HasSum (fun i => ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ i) (∫⁻ a, f a ∂Measure.sum μ) :=
(lintegral_sum_measure f μ).symm ▸ ENNReal.summable.hasSum
#align measure_theory.has_sum_lintegral_measure MeasureTheory.hasSum_lintegral_measure
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_add_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (μ ν : Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂(μ + ν) = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, f a ∂ν := by
simpa [tsum_fintype] using lintegral_sum_measure f fun b => cond b μ ν
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_measure
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_finset_sum_measure {ι} {m : MeasurableSpace α} (s : Finset ι) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞)
(μ : ι → Measure α) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂(∑ i ∈ s, μ i) = ∑ i ∈ s, ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ i := by
rw [← Measure.sum_coe_finset, lintegral_sum_measure, ← Finset.tsum_subtype']
simp only [Finset.coe_sort_coe]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_finset_sum_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_finset_sum_measure
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_zero_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂(0 : Measure α) = 0 := by
simp [lintegral]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_zero_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_zero_measure
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_of_isEmpty {α} [MeasurableSpace α] [IsEmpty α] (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = 0 := by
have : Subsingleton (Measure α) := inferInstance
convert lintegral_zero_measure f
theorem set_lintegral_empty (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ x in ∅, f x ∂μ = 0 := by
rw [Measure.restrict_empty, lintegral_zero_measure]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_empty MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_empty
theorem set_lintegral_univ (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ x in univ, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by
rw [Measure.restrict_univ]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_univ MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_univ
theorem set_lintegral_measure_zero (s : Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hs' : μ s = 0) :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0 := by
convert lintegral_zero_measure _
exact Measure.restrict_eq_zero.2 hs'
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_measure_zero MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_measure_zero
theorem lintegral_finset_sum' (s : Finset β) {f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ b ∈ s, AEMeasurable (f b) μ) :
∫⁻ a, ∑ b ∈ s, f b a ∂μ = ∑ b ∈ s, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ := by
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with a s has ih
· simp
· simp only [Finset.sum_insert has]
rw [Finset.forall_mem_insert] at hf
rw [lintegral_add_left' hf.1, ih hf.2]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_finset_sum' MeasureTheory.lintegral_finset_sum'
theorem lintegral_finset_sum (s : Finset β) {f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ b ∈ s, Measurable (f b)) :
∫⁻ a, ∑ b ∈ s, f b a ∂μ = ∑ b ∈ s, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ :=
lintegral_finset_sum' s fun b hb => (hf b hb).aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_finset_sum MeasureTheory.lintegral_finset_sum
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_const_mul (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ :=
calc
∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, (const α r * eapprox f n) a ∂μ := by
congr
funext a
rw [← iSup_eapprox_apply f hf, ENNReal.mul_iSup]
simp
_ = ⨆ n, r * (eapprox f n).lintegral μ := by
rw [lintegral_iSup]
· congr
funext n
rw [← SimpleFunc.const_mul_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral]
· intro n
exact SimpleFunc.measurable _
· intro i j h a
exact mul_le_mul_left' (monotone_eapprox _ h _) _
_ = r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by rw [← ENNReal.mul_iSup, lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral hf]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_mul MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_mul
theorem lintegral_const_mul'' (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
have A : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, hf.mk f a ∂μ := lintegral_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk
have B : ∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, r * hf.mk f a ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae (EventuallyEq.fun_comp hf.ae_eq_mk _)
rw [A, B, lintegral_const_mul _ hf.measurable_mk]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_mul'' MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_mul''
theorem lintegral_const_mul_le (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral, ENNReal.mul_iSup]
refine iSup_le fun s => ?_
rw [ENNReal.mul_iSup, iSup_le_iff]
intro hs
rw [← SimpleFunc.const_mul_lintegral, lintegral]
refine le_iSup_of_le (const α r * s) (le_iSup_of_le (fun x => ?_) le_rfl)
exact mul_le_mul_left' (hs x) _
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_mul_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_mul_le
theorem lintegral_const_mul' (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hr : r ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
by_cases h : r = 0
· simp [h]
apply le_antisymm _ (lintegral_const_mul_le r f)
have rinv : r * r⁻¹ = 1 := ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel h hr
have rinv' : r⁻¹ * r = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact rinv
have := lintegral_const_mul_le (μ := μ) r⁻¹ fun x => r * f x
simp? [(mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, rinv'] at this says
simp only [(mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, rinv', one_mul] at this
simpa [(mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, rinv] using mul_le_mul_left' this r
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_mul' MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_mul'
theorem lintegral_mul_const (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ a, f a * r ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) * r := by simp_rw [mul_comm, lintegral_const_mul r hf]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mul_const MeasureTheory.lintegral_mul_const
theorem lintegral_mul_const'' (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
∫⁻ a, f a * r ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) * r := by simp_rw [mul_comm, lintegral_const_mul'' r hf]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mul_const'' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mul_const''
theorem lintegral_mul_const_le (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
(∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) * r ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a * r ∂μ := by
simp_rw [mul_comm, lintegral_const_mul_le r f]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mul_const_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_mul_const_le
theorem lintegral_mul_const' (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hr : r ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a * r ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) * r := by simp_rw [mul_comm, lintegral_const_mul' r f hr]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mul_const' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mul_const'
theorem lintegral_lintegral_mul {β} [MeasurableSpace β] {ν : Measure β} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
{g : β → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g ν) :
∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, f x * g y ∂ν ∂μ = (∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) * ∫⁻ y, g y ∂ν := by
simp [lintegral_const_mul'' _ hg, lintegral_mul_const'' _ hf]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_lintegral_mul MeasureTheory.lintegral_lintegral_mul
-- TODO: Need a better way of rewriting inside of an integral
theorem lintegral_rw₁ {f f' : α → β} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] f') (g : β → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, g (f a) ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g (f' a) ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae <| h.mono fun a h => by dsimp only; rw [h]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_rw₁ MeasureTheory.lintegral_rw₁
-- TODO: Need a better way of rewriting inside of an integral
theorem lintegral_rw₂ {f₁ f₁' : α → β} {f₂ f₂' : α → γ} (h₁ : f₁ =ᵐ[μ] f₁') (h₂ : f₂ =ᵐ[μ] f₂')
(g : β → γ → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ a, g (f₁ a) (f₂ a) ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g (f₁' a) (f₂' a) ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae <| h₁.mp <| h₂.mono fun _ h₂ h₁ => by dsimp only; rw [h₁, h₂]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_rw₂ MeasureTheory.lintegral_rw₂
theorem lintegral_indicator_le (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
simp only [lintegral]
apply iSup_le (fun g ↦ (iSup_le (fun hg ↦ ?_)))
have : g ≤ f := hg.trans (indicator_le_self s f)
refine le_iSup_of_le g (le_iSup_of_le this (le_of_eq ?_))
rw [lintegral_restrict, SimpleFunc.lintegral]
congr with t
by_cases H : t = 0
· simp [H]
congr with x
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_singleton_iff, mem_inter_iff, iff_self_and]
rintro rfl
contrapose! H
simpa [H] using hg x
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_indicator (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
apply le_antisymm (lintegral_indicator_le f s)
simp only [lintegral, ← restrict_lintegral_eq_lintegral_restrict _ hs, iSup_subtype']
refine iSup_mono' (Subtype.forall.2 fun φ hφ => ?_)
refine ⟨⟨φ.restrict s, fun x => ?_⟩, le_rfl⟩
simp [hφ x, hs, indicator_le_indicator]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_indicator MeasureTheory.lintegral_indicator
theorem lintegral_indicator₀ (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
rw [← lintegral_congr_ae (indicator_ae_eq_of_ae_eq_set hs.toMeasurable_ae_eq),
lintegral_indicator _ (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _),
Measure.restrict_congr_set hs.toMeasurable_ae_eq]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_indicator₀ MeasureTheory.lintegral_indicator₀
theorem lintegral_indicator_const_le (s : Set α) (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator (fun _ => c) a ∂μ ≤ c * μ s :=
(lintegral_indicator_le _ _).trans (set_lintegral_const s c).le
theorem lintegral_indicator_const₀ {s : Set α} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator (fun _ => c) a ∂μ = c * μ s := by
rw [lintegral_indicator₀ _ hs, set_lintegral_const]
theorem lintegral_indicator_const {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator (fun _ => c) a ∂μ = c * μ s :=
lintegral_indicator_const₀ hs.nullMeasurableSet c
#align measure_theory.lintegral_indicator_const MeasureTheory.lintegral_indicator_const
theorem set_lintegral_eq_const {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ x in { x | f x = r }, f x ∂μ = r * μ { x | f x = r } := by
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ { x | f x = r } → f x = r := ae_of_all μ fun _ hx => hx
rw [set_lintegral_congr_fun _ this]
· rw [lintegral_const, Measure.restrict_apply MeasurableSet.univ, Set.univ_inter]
· exact hf (measurableSet_singleton r)
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_eq_const MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_eq_const
theorem lintegral_indicator_one_le (s : Set α) : ∫⁻ a, s.indicator 1 a ∂μ ≤ μ s :=
(lintegral_indicator_const_le _ _).trans <| (one_mul _).le
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_indicator_one₀ (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) : ∫⁻ a, s.indicator 1 a ∂μ = μ s :=
(lintegral_indicator_const₀ hs _).trans <| one_mul _
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_indicator_one (hs : MeasurableSet s) : ∫⁻ a, s.indicator 1 a ∂μ = μ s :=
(lintegral_indicator_const hs _).trans <| one_mul _
#align measure_theory.lintegral_indicator_one MeasureTheory.lintegral_indicator_one
theorem lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hle : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g)
(hg : AEMeasurable g μ) (ε : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ε * μ { x | f x + ε ≤ g x } ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rcases exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq μ f with ⟨φ, hφm, hφ_le, hφ_eq⟩
calc
∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ + ε * μ { x | f x + ε ≤ g x } = ∫⁻ x, φ x ∂μ + ε * μ { x | f x + ε ≤ g x } := by
rw [hφ_eq]
_ ≤ ∫⁻ x, φ x ∂μ + ε * μ { x | φ x + ε ≤ g x } := by
gcongr
exact fun x => (add_le_add_right (hφ_le _) _).trans
_ = ∫⁻ x, φ x + indicator { x | φ x + ε ≤ g x } (fun _ => ε) x ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_add_left hφm, lintegral_indicator₀, set_lintegral_const]
exact measurableSet_le (hφm.nullMeasurable.measurable'.add_const _) hg.nullMeasurable
_ ≤ ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ := lintegral_mono_ae (hle.mono fun x hx₁ => ?_)
simp only [indicator_apply]; split_ifs with hx₂
exacts [hx₂, (add_zero _).trans_le <| (hφ_le x).trans hx₁]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral
theorem mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (ε : ℝ≥0∞) :
ε * μ { x | ε ≤ f x } ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
simpa only [lintegral_zero, zero_add] using
lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral (ae_of_all _ fun x => zero_le (f x)) hf ε
#align measure_theory.mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ MeasureTheory.mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀
theorem mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (ε : ℝ≥0∞) :
ε * μ { x | ε ≤ f x } ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ :=
mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ hf.aemeasurable ε
#align measure_theory.mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral MeasureTheory.mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral
lemma meas_le_lintegral₀ {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ)
{s : Set α} (hs : ∀ x ∈ s, 1 ≤ f x) : μ s ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
apply le_trans _ (mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ hf 1)
rw [one_mul]
exact measure_mono hs
lemma lintegral_le_meas {s : Set α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ a, f a ≤ 1) (h'f : ∀ a ∈ sᶜ, f a = 0) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ μ s := by
apply (lintegral_mono (fun x ↦ ?_)).trans (lintegral_indicator_one_le s)
by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· simpa [hx] using hf x
· simpa [hx] using h'f x hx
theorem lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ)
(hμf : μ {x | f x = ∞} ≠ 0) : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∞ :=
eq_top_iff.mpr <|
calc
∞ = ∞ * μ { x | ∞ ≤ f x } := by simp [mul_eq_top, hμf]
_ ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ hf ∞
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero
theorem setLintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero (hf : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s))
(hμf : μ ({x ∈ s | f x = ∞}) ≠ 0) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∞ :=
lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero hf <|
mt (eq_bot_mono <| by rw [← setOf_inter_eq_sep]; exact Measure.le_restrict_apply _ _) hμf
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero MeasureTheory.setLintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero
theorem measure_eq_top_of_lintegral_ne_top (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hμf : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
μ {x | f x = ∞} = 0 :=
of_not_not fun h => hμf <| lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero hf h
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_top_of_lintegral_ne_top MeasureTheory.measure_eq_top_of_lintegral_ne_top
theorem measure_eq_top_of_setLintegral_ne_top (hf : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s))
(hμf : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) : μ ({x ∈ s | f x = ∞}) = 0 :=
of_not_not fun h => hμf <| setLintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero hf h
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_top_of_set_lintegral_ne_top MeasureTheory.measure_eq_top_of_setLintegral_ne_top
theorem meas_ge_le_lintegral_div {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0)
(hε' : ε ≠ ∞) : μ { x | ε ≤ f x } ≤ (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) / ε :=
(ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le (Or.inl hε) (Or.inl hε')).2 <| by
rw [mul_comm]
exact mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ hf ε
#align measure_theory.meas_ge_le_lintegral_div MeasureTheory.meas_ge_le_lintegral_div
theorem ae_eq_of_ae_le_of_lintegral_le {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) (hf : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞)
(hg : AEMeasurable g μ) (hgf : ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) : f =ᵐ[μ] g := by
have : ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, g x < f x + (n : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ := by
intro n
simp only [ae_iff, not_lt]
have : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ + (↑n)⁻¹ * μ { x : α | f x + (n : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ ≤ g x } ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ :=
(lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral hfg hg n⁻¹).trans hgf
rw [(ENNReal.cancel_of_ne hf).add_le_iff_nonpos_right, nonpos_iff_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero] at this
exact this.resolve_left (ENNReal.inv_ne_zero.2 (ENNReal.natCast_ne_top _))
refine hfg.mp ((ae_all_iff.2 this).mono fun x hlt hle => hle.antisymm ?_)
suffices Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => f x + (n : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) from
ge_of_tendsto' this fun i => (hlt i).le
simpa only [inv_top, add_zero] using
tendsto_const_nhds.add (ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 ENNReal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top)
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_of_ae_le_of_lintegral_le MeasureTheory.ae_eq_of_ae_le_of_lintegral_le
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_eq_zero_iff' {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
have : ∫⁻ _ : α, 0 ∂μ ≠ ∞ := by simp [lintegral_zero, zero_ne_top]
⟨fun h =>
(ae_eq_of_ae_le_of_lintegral_le (ae_of_all _ <| zero_le f) this hf
(h.trans lintegral_zero.symm).le).symm,
fun h => (lintegral_congr_ae h).trans lintegral_zero⟩
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_zero_iff' MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_zero_iff'
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_eq_zero_iff {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
lintegral_eq_zero_iff' hf.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_zero_iff MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_zero_iff
theorem lintegral_pos_iff_support {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
(0 < ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) ↔ 0 < μ (Function.support f) := by
simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, hf, Filter.EventuallyEq, ae_iff, Function.support]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_pos_iff_support MeasureTheory.lintegral_pos_iff_support
theorem setLintegral_pos_iff {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set α} :
0 < ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ ↔ 0 < μ (Function.support f ∩ s) := by
rw [lintegral_pos_iff_support hf, Measure.restrict_apply (measurableSet_support hf)]
theorem lintegral_iSup_ae {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ n, Measurable (f n))
(h_mono : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, f n a ≤ f n.succ a) : ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := exists_measurable_superset_of_null (ae_iff.1 (ae_all_iff.2 h_mono))
let g n a := if a ∈ s then 0 else f n a
have g_eq_f : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ n, g n a = f n a :=
(measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem.1 hs.2.2).mono fun a ha n => if_neg ha
calc
∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f n a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, g n a ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae <| g_eq_f.mono fun a ha => by simp only [ha]
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, g n a ∂μ :=
(lintegral_iSup (fun n => measurable_const.piecewise hs.2.1 (hf n))
(monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun n a => ?_))
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by simp only [lintegral_congr_ae (g_eq_f.mono fun _a ha => ha _)]
simp only [g]
split_ifs with h
· rfl
· have := Set.not_mem_subset hs.1 h
simp only [not_forall, not_le, mem_setOf_eq, not_exists, not_lt] at this
exact this n
#align measure_theory.lintegral_supr_ae MeasureTheory.lintegral_iSup_ae
theorem lintegral_sub' {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) (hg_fin : ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ ≠ ∞)
(h_le : g ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : ∫⁻ a, f a - g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ - ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
refine ENNReal.eq_sub_of_add_eq hg_fin ?_
rw [← lintegral_add_right' _ hg]
exact lintegral_congr_ae (h_le.mono fun x hx => tsub_add_cancel_of_le hx)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_sub' MeasureTheory.lintegral_sub'
theorem lintegral_sub {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : Measurable g) (hg_fin : ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ ≠ ∞)
(h_le : g ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : ∫⁻ a, f a - g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ - ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_sub' hg.aemeasurable hg_fin h_le
#align measure_theory.lintegral_sub MeasureTheory.lintegral_sub
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Lebesgue.lean | 979 | 987 | theorem lintegral_sub_le' (f g : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ - ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, g x - f x ∂μ := by |
rw [tsub_le_iff_right]
by_cases hfi : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∞
· rw [hfi, add_top]
exact le_top
· rw [← lintegral_add_right' _ hf]
gcongr
exact le_tsub_add
|
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.RowCol
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
#align_import data.matrix.notation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a99f85220eaf38f14f94e04699943e185a5e1d1a"
namespace Matrix
universe u uₘ uₙ uₒ
variable {α : Type u} {o n m : ℕ} {m' : Type uₘ} {n' : Type uₙ} {o' : Type uₒ}
open Matrix
variable (a b : ℕ)
instance repr [Repr α] : Repr (Matrix (Fin m) (Fin n) α) where
reprPrec f _p :=
(Std.Format.bracket "!![" · "]") <|
(Std.Format.joinSep · (";" ++ Std.Format.line)) <|
(List.finRange m).map fun i =>
Std.Format.fill <| -- wrap line in a single place rather than all at once
(Std.Format.joinSep · ("," ++ Std.Format.line)) <|
(List.finRange n).map fun j => _root_.repr (f i j)
#align matrix.has_repr Matrix.repr
@[simp]
theorem cons_val' (v : n' → α) (B : Fin m → n' → α) (i j) :
vecCons v B i j = vecCons (v j) (fun i => B i j) i := by refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ i <;> simp
#align matrix.cons_val' Matrix.cons_val'
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note: LHS does not simplify.
theorem head_val' (B : Fin m.succ → n' → α) (j : n') : (vecHead fun i => B i j) = vecHead B j :=
rfl
#align matrix.head_val' Matrix.head_val'
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note: LHS does not simplify.
theorem tail_val' (B : Fin m.succ → n' → α) (j : n') :
(vecTail fun i => B i j) = fun i => vecTail B i j := rfl
#align matrix.tail_val' Matrix.tail_val'
section SMul
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α]
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem smul_mat_empty {m' : Type*} (x : α) (A : Fin 0 → m' → α) : x • A = ![] :=
empty_eq _
#align matrix.smul_mat_empty Matrix.smul_mat_empty
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/Notation.lean | 376 | 379 | theorem smul_mat_cons (x : α) (v : n' → α) (A : Fin m → n' → α) :
x • vecCons v A = vecCons (x • v) (x • A) := by |
ext i
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ i <;> simp
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Comp
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.RestrictScalars
#align_import analysis.calculus.deriv.comp from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3bce8d800a6f2b8f63fe1e588fd76a9ff4adcebe"
universe u v w
open scoped Classical
open Topology Filter ENNReal
open Filter Asymptotics Set
open ContinuousLinearMap (smulRight smulRight_one_eq_iff)
variable {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {F : Type v} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {E : Type w} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : 𝕜 → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : F}
variable {x : 𝕜}
variable {s t : Set 𝕜}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter 𝕜}
section Composition
variable {𝕜' : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜'] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 𝕜'] [NormedSpace 𝕜' F]
[IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕜' F] {s' t' : Set 𝕜'} {h : 𝕜 → 𝕜'} {h₁ : 𝕜 → 𝕜} {h₂ : 𝕜' → 𝕜'} {h' h₂' : 𝕜'}
{h₁' : 𝕜} {g₁ : 𝕜' → F} {g₁' : F} {L' : Filter 𝕜'} {y : 𝕜'} (x)
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.scomp (hg : HasDerivAtFilter g₁ g₁' (h x) L')
(hh : HasDerivAtFilter h h' x L) (hL : Tendsto h L L') :
HasDerivAtFilter (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x L := by
simpa using ((hg.restrictScalars 𝕜).comp x hh hL).hasDerivAtFilter
#align has_deriv_at_filter.scomp HasDerivAtFilter.scomp
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.scomp_of_eq (hg : HasDerivAtFilter g₁ g₁' y L')
(hh : HasDerivAtFilter h h' x L) (hy : y = h x) (hL : Tendsto h L L') :
HasDerivAtFilter (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x L := by
rw [hy] at hg; exact hg.scomp x hh hL
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.scomp_hasDerivAt (hg : HasDerivWithinAt g₁ g₁' s' (h x))
(hh : HasDerivAt h h' x) (hs : ∀ x, h x ∈ s') : HasDerivAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x :=
hg.scomp x hh <| tendsto_inf.2 ⟨hh.continuousAt, tendsto_principal.2 <| eventually_of_forall hs⟩
#align has_deriv_within_at.scomp_has_deriv_at HasDerivWithinAt.scomp_hasDerivAt
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.scomp_hasDerivAt_of_eq (hg : HasDerivWithinAt g₁ g₁' s' y)
(hh : HasDerivAt h h' x) (hs : ∀ x, h x ∈ s') (hy : y = h x) :
HasDerivAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x := by
rw [hy] at hg; exact hg.scomp_hasDerivAt x hh hs
nonrec theorem HasDerivWithinAt.scomp (hg : HasDerivWithinAt g₁ g₁' t' (h x))
(hh : HasDerivWithinAt h h' s x) (hst : MapsTo h s t') :
HasDerivWithinAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') s x :=
hg.scomp x hh <| hh.continuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin hst
#align has_deriv_within_at.scomp HasDerivWithinAt.scomp
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.scomp_of_eq (hg : HasDerivWithinAt g₁ g₁' t' y)
(hh : HasDerivWithinAt h h' s x) (hst : MapsTo h s t') (hy : y = h x) :
HasDerivWithinAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') s x := by
rw [hy] at hg; exact hg.scomp x hh hst
nonrec theorem HasDerivAt.scomp (hg : HasDerivAt g₁ g₁' (h x)) (hh : HasDerivAt h h' x) :
HasDerivAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x :=
hg.scomp x hh hh.continuousAt
#align has_deriv_at.scomp HasDerivAt.scomp
theorem HasDerivAt.scomp_of_eq
(hg : HasDerivAt g₁ g₁' y) (hh : HasDerivAt h h' x) (hy : y = h x) :
HasDerivAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x := by
rw [hy] at hg; exact hg.scomp x hh
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.scomp (hg : HasStrictDerivAt g₁ g₁' (h x)) (hh : HasStrictDerivAt h h' x) :
HasStrictDerivAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x := by
simpa using ((hg.restrictScalars 𝕜).comp x hh).hasStrictDerivAt
#align has_strict_deriv_at.scomp HasStrictDerivAt.scomp
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.scomp_of_eq
(hg : HasStrictDerivAt g₁ g₁' y) (hh : HasStrictDerivAt h h' x) (hy : y = h x) :
HasStrictDerivAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x := by
rw [hy] at hg; exact hg.scomp x hh
theorem HasDerivAt.scomp_hasDerivWithinAt (hg : HasDerivAt g₁ g₁' (h x))
(hh : HasDerivWithinAt h h' s x) : HasDerivWithinAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') s x :=
HasDerivWithinAt.scomp x hg.hasDerivWithinAt hh (mapsTo_univ _ _)
#align has_deriv_at.scomp_has_deriv_within_at HasDerivAt.scomp_hasDerivWithinAt
theorem HasDerivAt.scomp_hasDerivWithinAt_of_eq (hg : HasDerivAt g₁ g₁' y)
(hh : HasDerivWithinAt h h' s x) (hy : y = h x) :
HasDerivWithinAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') s x := by
rw [hy] at hg; exact hg.scomp_hasDerivWithinAt x hh
theorem derivWithin.scomp (hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜' g₁ t' (h x))
(hh : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 h s x) (hs : MapsTo h s t') (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
derivWithin (g₁ ∘ h) s x = derivWithin h s x • derivWithin g₁ t' (h x) :=
(HasDerivWithinAt.scomp x hg.hasDerivWithinAt hh.hasDerivWithinAt hs).derivWithin hxs
#align deriv_within.scomp derivWithin.scomp
theorem derivWithin.scomp_of_eq (hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜' g₁ t' y)
(hh : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 h s x) (hs : MapsTo h s t') (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(hy : y = h x) :
derivWithin (g₁ ∘ h) s x = derivWithin h s x • derivWithin g₁ t' (h x) := by
rw [hy] at hg; exact derivWithin.scomp x hg hh hs hxs
theorem deriv.scomp (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜' g₁ (h x)) (hh : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 h x) :
deriv (g₁ ∘ h) x = deriv h x • deriv g₁ (h x) :=
(HasDerivAt.scomp x hg.hasDerivAt hh.hasDerivAt).deriv
#align deriv.scomp deriv.scomp
theorem deriv.scomp_of_eq
(hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜' g₁ y) (hh : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 h x) (hy : y = h x) :
deriv (g₁ ∘ h) x = deriv h x • deriv g₁ (h x) := by
rw [hy] at hg; exact deriv.scomp x hg hh
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.comp_hasFDerivAtFilter {f : E → 𝕜'} {f' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜'} (x) {L'' : Filter E}
(hh₂ : HasDerivAtFilter h₂ h₂' (f x) L') (hf : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L'')
(hL : Tendsto f L'' L') : HasFDerivAtFilter (h₂ ∘ f) (h₂' • f') x L'' := by
convert (hh₂.restrictScalars 𝕜).comp x hf hL
ext x
simp [mul_comm]
#align has_deriv_at_filter.comp_has_fderiv_at_filter HasDerivAtFilter.comp_hasFDerivAtFilter
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.comp_hasFDerivAtFilter_of_eq
{f : E → 𝕜'} {f' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜'} (x) {L'' : Filter E}
(hh₂ : HasDerivAtFilter h₂ h₂' y L') (hf : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L'')
(hL : Tendsto f L'' L') (hy : y = f x) : HasFDerivAtFilter (h₂ ∘ f) (h₂' • f') x L'' := by
rw [hy] at hh₂; exact hh₂.comp_hasFDerivAtFilter x hf hL
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.comp_hasStrictFDerivAt {f : E → 𝕜'} {f' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜'} (x)
(hh : HasStrictDerivAt h₂ h₂' (f x)) (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (h₂ ∘ f) (h₂' • f') x := by
rw [HasStrictDerivAt] at hh
convert (hh.restrictScalars 𝕜).comp x hf
ext x
simp [mul_comm]
#align has_strict_deriv_at.comp_has_strict_fderiv_at HasStrictDerivAt.comp_hasStrictFDerivAt
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.comp_hasStrictFDerivAt_of_eq {f : E → 𝕜'} {f' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜'} (x)
(hh : HasStrictDerivAt h₂ h₂' y) (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (hy : y = f x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (h₂ ∘ f) (h₂' • f') x := by
rw [hy] at hh; exact hh.comp_hasStrictFDerivAt x hf
theorem HasDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivAt {f : E → 𝕜'} {f' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜'} (x)
(hh : HasDerivAt h₂ h₂' (f x)) (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) : HasFDerivAt (h₂ ∘ f) (h₂' • f') x :=
hh.comp_hasFDerivAtFilter x hf hf.continuousAt
#align has_deriv_at.comp_has_fderiv_at HasDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivAt
theorem HasDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivAt_of_eq {f : E → 𝕜'} {f' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜'} (x)
(hh : HasDerivAt h₂ h₂' y) (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hy : y = f x) :
HasFDerivAt (h₂ ∘ f) (h₂' • f') x := by
rw [hy] at hh; exact hh.comp_hasFDerivAt x hf
theorem HasDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt {f : E → 𝕜'} {f' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜'} {s} (x)
(hh : HasDerivAt h₂ h₂' (f x)) (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (h₂ ∘ f) (h₂' • f') s x :=
hh.comp_hasFDerivAtFilter x hf hf.continuousWithinAt
#align has_deriv_at.comp_has_fderiv_within_at HasDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt
theorem HasDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_of_eq {f : E → 𝕜'} {f' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜'} {s} (x)
(hh : HasDerivAt h₂ h₂' y) (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hy : y = f x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (h₂ ∘ f) (h₂' • f') s x := by
rw [hy] at hh; exact hh.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x hf
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt {f : E → 𝕜'} {f' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜'} {s t} (x)
(hh : HasDerivWithinAt h₂ h₂' t (f x)) (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hst : MapsTo f s t) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (h₂ ∘ f) (h₂' • f') s x :=
hh.comp_hasFDerivAtFilter x hf <| hf.continuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin hst
#align has_deriv_within_at.comp_has_fderiv_within_at HasDerivWithinAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_of_eq {f : E → 𝕜'} {f' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜'} {s t} (x)
(hh : HasDerivWithinAt h₂ h₂' t y) (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hst : MapsTo f s t)
(hy : y = f x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (h₂ ∘ f) (h₂' • f') s x := by
rw [hy] at hh; exact hh.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x hf hst
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/Deriv/Comp.lean | 225 | 229 | theorem HasDerivAtFilter.comp (hh₂ : HasDerivAtFilter h₂ h₂' (h x) L')
(hh : HasDerivAtFilter h h' x L) (hL : Tendsto h L L') :
HasDerivAtFilter (h₂ ∘ h) (h₂' * h') x L := by |
rw [mul_comm]
exact hh₂.scomp x hh hL
|
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformConvergenceTopology
#align_import topology.uniform_space.equicontinuity from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
section
open UniformSpace Filter Set Uniformity Topology UniformConvergence Function
variable {ι κ X X' Y Z α α' β β' γ 𝓕 : Type*} [tX : TopologicalSpace X] [tY : TopologicalSpace Y]
[tZ : TopologicalSpace Z] [uα : UniformSpace α] [uβ : UniformSpace β] [uγ : UniformSpace γ]
def EquicontinuousAt (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U
#align equicontinuous_at EquicontinuousAt
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousAt (H : Set <| X → α) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousAt ((↑) : H → X → α) x₀
#align set.equicontinuous_at Set.EquicontinuousAt
def EquicontinuousWithinAt (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[S] x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousWithinAt (H : Set <| X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousWithinAt ((↑) : H → X → α) S x₀
def Equicontinuous (F : ι → X → α) : Prop :=
∀ x₀, EquicontinuousAt F x₀
#align equicontinuous Equicontinuous
protected abbrev Set.Equicontinuous (H : Set <| X → α) : Prop :=
Equicontinuous ((↑) : H → X → α)
#align set.equicontinuous Set.Equicontinuous
def EquicontinuousOn (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) : Prop :=
∀ x₀ ∈ S, EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousOn (H : Set <| X → α) (S : Set X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousOn ((↑) : H → X → α) S
def UniformEquicontinuous (F : ι → β → α) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ xy : β × β in 𝓤 β, ∀ i, (F i xy.1, F i xy.2) ∈ U
#align uniform_equicontinuous UniformEquicontinuous
protected abbrev Set.UniformEquicontinuous (H : Set <| β → α) : Prop :=
UniformEquicontinuous ((↑) : H → β → α)
#align set.uniform_equicontinuous Set.UniformEquicontinuous
def UniformEquicontinuousOn (F : ι → β → α) (S : Set β) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ xy : β × β in 𝓤 β ⊓ 𝓟 (S ×ˢ S), ∀ i, (F i xy.1, F i xy.2) ∈ U
protected abbrev Set.UniformEquicontinuousOn (H : Set <| β → α) (S : Set β) : Prop :=
UniformEquicontinuousOn ((↑) : H → β → α) S
lemma EquicontinuousAt.equicontinuousWithinAt {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (H : EquicontinuousAt F x₀)
(S : Set X) : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono inf_le_left
lemma EquicontinuousWithinAt.mono {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} {S T : Set X}
(H : EquicontinuousWithinAt F T x₀) (hST : S ⊆ T) : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono <| nhdsWithin_mono x₀ hST
@[simp] lemma equicontinuousWithinAt_univ (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F univ x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousAt F x₀ := by
rw [EquicontinuousWithinAt, EquicontinuousAt, nhdsWithin_univ]
lemma equicontinuousAt_restrict_iff (F : ι → X → α) {S : Set X} (x₀ : S) :
EquicontinuousAt (S.restrict ∘ F) x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ := by
simp [EquicontinuousWithinAt, EquicontinuousAt,
← eventually_nhds_subtype_iff]
lemma Equicontinuous.equicontinuousOn {F : ι → X → α} (H : Equicontinuous F)
(S : Set X) : EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x _ ↦ (H x).equicontinuousWithinAt S
lemma EquicontinuousOn.mono {F : ι → X → α} {S T : Set X}
(H : EquicontinuousOn F T) (hST : S ⊆ T) : EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x hx ↦ (H x (hST hx)).mono hST
lemma equicontinuousOn_univ (F : ι → X → α) :
EquicontinuousOn F univ ↔ Equicontinuous F := by
simp [EquicontinuousOn, Equicontinuous]
lemma equicontinuous_restrict_iff (F : ι → X → α) {S : Set X} :
Equicontinuous (S.restrict ∘ F) ↔ EquicontinuousOn F S := by
simp [Equicontinuous, EquicontinuousOn, equicontinuousAt_restrict_iff]
lemma UniformEquicontinuous.uniformEquicontinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} (H : UniformEquicontinuous F)
(S : Set β) : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono inf_le_left
lemma UniformEquicontinuousOn.mono {F : ι → β → α} {S T : Set β}
(H : UniformEquicontinuousOn F T) (hST : S ⊆ T) : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono <| by gcongr
lemma uniformEquicontinuousOn_univ (F : ι → β → α) :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F univ ↔ UniformEquicontinuous F := by
simp [UniformEquicontinuousOn, UniformEquicontinuous]
lemma uniformEquicontinuous_restrict_iff (F : ι → β → α) {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuous (S.restrict ∘ F) ↔ UniformEquicontinuousOn F S := by
rw [UniformEquicontinuous, UniformEquicontinuousOn]
conv in _ ⊓ _ => rw [← Subtype.range_val (s := S), ← range_prod_map, ← map_comap]
rfl
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuousAt_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ :=
fun _ _ ↦ eventually_of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuousWithinAt_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun _ _ ↦ eventually_of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuous_empty [IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) :
Equicontinuous F :=
equicontinuousAt_empty F
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuousOn_empty [IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) :
EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x₀ _ ↦ equicontinuousWithinAt_empty F S x₀
@[simp]
lemma uniformEquicontinuous_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → β → α) :
UniformEquicontinuous F :=
fun _ _ ↦ eventually_of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
@[simp]
lemma uniformEquicontinuousOn_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → β → α) (S : Set β) :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun _ _ ↦ eventually_of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
theorem equicontinuousAt_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousAt (F i) x₀ := by
simp [EquicontinuousAt, ContinuousAt, (nhds_basis_uniformity' (𝓤 α).basis_sets).tendsto_right_iff,
UniformSpace.ball, @forall_swap _ ι]
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousWithinAt (F i) S x₀ := by
simp [EquicontinuousWithinAt, ContinuousWithinAt,
(nhds_basis_uniformity' (𝓤 α).basis_sets).tendsto_right_iff, UniformSpace.ball,
@forall_swap _ ι]
theorem equicontinuous_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ ∀ i, Continuous (F i) := by
simp only [Equicontinuous, equicontinuousAt_finite, continuous_iff_continuousAt, @forall_swap ι]
theorem equicontinuousOn_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousOn (F i) S := by
simp only [EquicontinuousOn, equicontinuousWithinAt_finite, ContinuousOn, @forall_swap ι]
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuous (F i) := by
simp only [UniformEquicontinuous, eventually_all, @forall_swap _ ι]; rfl
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Equicontinuity.lean | 274 | 276 | theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuousOn (F i) S := by |
simp only [UniformEquicontinuousOn, eventually_all, @forall_swap _ ι]; rfl
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.PUnitInstances
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
#align_import algebra.module.submodule.lattice from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f7fc89d5d5ff1db2d1242c7bb0e9062ce47ef47c"
universe v
variable {R S M : Type*}
section AddCommMonoid
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Module S M]
variable [SMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R M]
variable {p q : Submodule R M}
namespace Submodule
instance : Bot (Submodule R M) :=
⟨{ (⊥ : AddSubmonoid M) with
carrier := {0}
smul_mem' := by simp }⟩
instance inhabited' : Inhabited (Submodule R M) :=
⟨⊥⟩
#align submodule.inhabited' Submodule.inhabited'
@[simp]
theorem bot_coe : ((⊥ : Submodule R M) : Set M) = {0} :=
rfl
#align submodule.bot_coe Submodule.bot_coe
@[simp]
theorem bot_toAddSubmonoid : (⊥ : Submodule R M).toAddSubmonoid = ⊥ :=
rfl
#align submodule.bot_to_add_submonoid Submodule.bot_toAddSubmonoid
@[simp]
lemma bot_toAddSubgroup {R M} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] :
(⊥ : Submodule R M).toAddSubgroup = ⊥ := rfl
variable (R) in
@[simp]
theorem mem_bot {x : M} : x ∈ (⊥ : Submodule R M) ↔ x = 0 :=
Set.mem_singleton_iff
#align submodule.mem_bot Submodule.mem_bot
instance uniqueBot : Unique (⊥ : Submodule R M) :=
⟨inferInstance, fun x ↦ Subtype.ext <| (mem_bot R).1 x.mem⟩
#align submodule.unique_bot Submodule.uniqueBot
instance : OrderBot (Submodule R M) where
bot := ⊥
bot_le p x := by simp (config := { contextual := true }) [zero_mem]
protected theorem eq_bot_iff (p : Submodule R M) : p = ⊥ ↔ ∀ x ∈ p, x = (0 : M) :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.symm ▸ fun _ hx ↦ (mem_bot R).mp hx,
fun h ↦ eq_bot_iff.mpr fun x hx ↦ (mem_bot R).mpr (h x hx)⟩
#align submodule.eq_bot_iff Submodule.eq_bot_iff
@[ext high]
protected theorem bot_ext (x y : (⊥ : Submodule R M)) : x = y := by
rcases x with ⟨x, xm⟩; rcases y with ⟨y, ym⟩; congr
rw [(Submodule.eq_bot_iff _).mp rfl x xm]
rw [(Submodule.eq_bot_iff _).mp rfl y ym]
#align submodule.bot_ext Submodule.bot_ext
protected theorem ne_bot_iff (p : Submodule R M) : p ≠ ⊥ ↔ ∃ x ∈ p, x ≠ (0 : M) := by
simp only [ne_eq, p.eq_bot_iff, not_forall, exists_prop]
#align submodule.ne_bot_iff Submodule.ne_bot_iff
theorem nonzero_mem_of_bot_lt {p : Submodule R M} (bot_lt : ⊥ < p) : ∃ a : p, a ≠ 0 :=
let ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩ := p.ne_bot_iff.mp bot_lt.ne'
⟨⟨b, hb₁⟩, hb₂ ∘ congr_arg Subtype.val⟩
#align submodule.nonzero_mem_of_bot_lt Submodule.nonzero_mem_of_bot_lt
theorem exists_mem_ne_zero_of_ne_bot {p : Submodule R M} (h : p ≠ ⊥) : ∃ b : M, b ∈ p ∧ b ≠ 0 :=
let ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩ := p.ne_bot_iff.mp h
⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩
#align submodule.exists_mem_ne_zero_of_ne_bot Submodule.exists_mem_ne_zero_of_ne_bot
-- FIXME: we default PUnit to PUnit.{1} here without the explicit universe annotation
@[simps]
def botEquivPUnit : (⊥ : Submodule R M) ≃ₗ[R] PUnit.{v+1} where
toFun _ := PUnit.unit
invFun _ := 0
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
left_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _ := rfl
#align submodule.bot_equiv_punit Submodule.botEquivPUnit
theorem subsingleton_iff_eq_bot : Subsingleton p ↔ p = ⊥ := by
rw [subsingleton_iff, Submodule.eq_bot_iff]
refine ⟨fun h x hx ↦ by simpa using h ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨0, p.zero_mem⟩,
fun h ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ ↦ by simp [h x hx, h y hy]⟩
theorem eq_bot_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton p] : p = ⊥ :=
subsingleton_iff_eq_bot.mp inferInstance
#align submodule.eq_bot_of_subsingleton Submodule.eq_bot_of_subsingleton
theorem nontrivial_iff_ne_bot : Nontrivial p ↔ p ≠ ⊥ := by
rw [iff_not_comm, not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, subsingleton_iff_eq_bot]
instance : Top (Submodule R M) :=
⟨{ (⊤ : AddSubmonoid M) with
carrier := Set.univ
smul_mem' := fun _ _ _ ↦ trivial }⟩
@[simp]
theorem top_coe : ((⊤ : Submodule R M) : Set M) = Set.univ :=
rfl
#align submodule.top_coe Submodule.top_coe
@[simp]
theorem top_toAddSubmonoid : (⊤ : Submodule R M).toAddSubmonoid = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align submodule.top_to_add_submonoid Submodule.top_toAddSubmonoid
@[simp]
lemma top_toAddSubgroup {R M} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] :
(⊤ : Submodule R M).toAddSubgroup = ⊤ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_top {x : M} : x ∈ (⊤ : Submodule R M) :=
trivial
#align submodule.mem_top Submodule.mem_top
instance : OrderTop (Submodule R M) where
top := ⊤
le_top _ _ _ := trivial
theorem eq_top_iff' {p : Submodule R M} : p = ⊤ ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ p :=
eq_top_iff.trans ⟨fun h _ ↦ h trivial, fun h x _ ↦ h x⟩
#align submodule.eq_top_iff' Submodule.eq_top_iff'
@[simps]
def topEquiv : (⊤ : Submodule R M) ≃ₗ[R] M where
toFun x := x
invFun x := ⟨x, mem_top⟩
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
#align submodule.top_equiv Submodule.topEquiv
instance : InfSet (Submodule R M) :=
⟨fun S ↦
{ carrier := ⋂ s ∈ S, (s : Set M)
zero_mem' := by simp [zero_mem]
add_mem' := by simp (config := { contextual := true }) [add_mem]
smul_mem' := by simp (config := { contextual := true }) [smul_mem] }⟩
private theorem sInf_le' {S : Set (Submodule R M)} {p} : p ∈ S → sInf S ≤ p :=
Set.biInter_subset_of_mem
private theorem le_sInf' {S : Set (Submodule R M)} {p} : (∀ q ∈ S, p ≤ q) → p ≤ sInf S :=
Set.subset_iInter₂
instance : Inf (Submodule R M) :=
⟨fun p q ↦
{ carrier := p ∩ q
zero_mem' := by simp [zero_mem]
add_mem' := by simp (config := { contextual := true }) [add_mem]
smul_mem' := by simp (config := { contextual := true }) [smul_mem] }⟩
instance completeLattice : CompleteLattice (Submodule R M) :=
{ (inferInstance : OrderTop (Submodule R M)),
(inferInstance : OrderBot (Submodule R M)) with
sup := fun a b ↦ sInf { x | a ≤ x ∧ b ≤ x }
le_sup_left := fun _ _ ↦ le_sInf' fun _ ⟨h, _⟩ ↦ h
le_sup_right := fun _ _ ↦ le_sInf' fun _ ⟨_, h⟩ ↦ h
sup_le := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ ↦ sInf_le' ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
le_inf := fun _ _ _ ↦ Set.subset_inter
inf_le_left := fun _ _ ↦ Set.inter_subset_left
inf_le_right := fun _ _ ↦ Set.inter_subset_right
le_sSup := fun _ _ hs ↦ le_sInf' fun _ hq ↦ by exact hq _ hs
sSup_le := fun _ _ hs ↦ sInf_le' hs
le_sInf := fun _ _ ↦ le_sInf'
sInf_le := fun _ _ ↦ sInf_le' }
#align submodule.complete_lattice Submodule.completeLattice
@[simp]
theorem inf_coe : ↑(p ⊓ q) = (p ∩ q : Set M) :=
rfl
#align submodule.inf_coe Submodule.inf_coe
@[simp]
theorem mem_inf {p q : Submodule R M} {x : M} : x ∈ p ⊓ q ↔ x ∈ p ∧ x ∈ q :=
Iff.rfl
#align submodule.mem_inf Submodule.mem_inf
@[simp]
theorem sInf_coe (P : Set (Submodule R M)) : (↑(sInf P) : Set M) = ⋂ p ∈ P, ↑p :=
rfl
#align submodule.Inf_coe Submodule.sInf_coe
@[simp]
theorem finset_inf_coe {ι} (s : Finset ι) (p : ι → Submodule R M) :
(↑(s.inf p) : Set M) = ⋂ i ∈ s, ↑(p i) := by
letI := Classical.decEq ι
refine s.induction_on ?_ fun i s _ ih ↦ ?_
· simp
· rw [Finset.inf_insert, inf_coe, ih]
simp
#align submodule.finset_inf_coe Submodule.finset_inf_coe
@[simp]
theorem iInf_coe {ι} (p : ι → Submodule R M) : (↑(⨅ i, p i) : Set M) = ⋂ i, ↑(p i) := by
rw [iInf, sInf_coe]; simp only [Set.mem_range, Set.iInter_exists, Set.iInter_iInter_eq']
#align submodule.infi_coe Submodule.iInf_coe
@[simp]
theorem mem_sInf {S : Set (Submodule R M)} {x : M} : x ∈ sInf S ↔ ∀ p ∈ S, x ∈ p :=
Set.mem_iInter₂
#align submodule.mem_Inf Submodule.mem_sInf
@[simp]
theorem mem_iInf {ι} (p : ι → Submodule R M) {x} : (x ∈ ⨅ i, p i) ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ p i := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, iInf_coe, Set.mem_iInter]; rfl
#align submodule.mem_infi Submodule.mem_iInf
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/Submodule/Lattice.lean | 266 | 268 | theorem mem_finset_inf {ι} {s : Finset ι} {p : ι → Submodule R M} {x : M} :
x ∈ s.inf p ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, x ∈ p i := by |
simp only [← SetLike.mem_coe, finset_inf_coe, Set.mem_iInter]
|
import Mathlib.Probability.ProbabilityMassFunction.Monad
#align_import probability.probability_mass_function.constructions from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4ac69b290818724c159de091daa3acd31da0ee6d"
universe u
namespace PMF
noncomputable section
variable {α β γ : Type*}
open scoped Classical
open NNReal ENNReal
section Map
def map (f : α → β) (p : PMF α) : PMF β :=
bind p (pure ∘ f)
#align pmf.map PMF.map
variable (f : α → β) (p : PMF α) (b : β)
theorem monad_map_eq_map {α β : Type u} (f : α → β) (p : PMF α) : f <$> p = p.map f := rfl
#align pmf.monad_map_eq_map PMF.monad_map_eq_map
@[simp]
theorem map_apply : (map f p) b = ∑' a, if b = f a then p a else 0 := by simp [map]
#align pmf.map_apply PMF.map_apply
@[simp]
theorem support_map : (map f p).support = f '' p.support :=
Set.ext fun b => by simp [map, @eq_comm β b]
#align pmf.support_map PMF.support_map
theorem mem_support_map_iff : b ∈ (map f p).support ↔ ∃ a ∈ p.support, f a = b := by simp
#align pmf.mem_support_map_iff PMF.mem_support_map_iff
theorem bind_pure_comp : bind p (pure ∘ f) = map f p := rfl
#align pmf.bind_pure_comp PMF.bind_pure_comp
theorem map_id : map id p = p :=
bind_pure _
#align pmf.map_id PMF.map_id
theorem map_comp (g : β → γ) : (p.map f).map g = p.map (g ∘ f) := by simp [map, Function.comp]
#align pmf.map_comp PMF.map_comp
theorem pure_map (a : α) : (pure a).map f = pure (f a) :=
pure_bind _ _
#align pmf.pure_map PMF.pure_map
theorem map_bind (q : α → PMF β) (f : β → γ) : (p.bind q).map f = p.bind fun a => (q a).map f :=
bind_bind _ _ _
#align pmf.map_bind PMF.map_bind
@[simp]
theorem bind_map (p : PMF α) (f : α → β) (q : β → PMF γ) : (p.map f).bind q = p.bind (q ∘ f) :=
(bind_bind _ _ _).trans (congr_arg _ (funext fun _ => pure_bind _ _))
#align pmf.bind_map PMF.bind_map
@[simp]
theorem map_const : p.map (Function.const α b) = pure b := by
simp only [map, Function.comp, bind_const, Function.const]
#align pmf.map_const PMF.map_const
section normalize
def normalize (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hf0 : tsum f ≠ 0) (hf : tsum f ≠ ∞) : PMF α :=
⟨fun a => f a * (∑' x, f x)⁻¹,
ENNReal.summable.hasSum_iff.2 (ENNReal.tsum_mul_right.trans (ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hf0 hf))⟩
#align pmf.normalize PMF.normalize
variable {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf0 : tsum f ≠ 0) (hf : tsum f ≠ ∞)
@[simp]
theorem normalize_apply (a : α) : (normalize f hf0 hf) a = f a * (∑' x, f x)⁻¹ := rfl
#align pmf.normalize_apply PMF.normalize_apply
@[simp]
theorem support_normalize : (normalize f hf0 hf).support = Function.support f :=
Set.ext fun a => by simp [hf, mem_support_iff]
#align pmf.support_normalize PMF.support_normalize
| Mathlib/Probability/ProbabilityMassFunction/Constructions.lean | 259 | 259 | theorem mem_support_normalize_iff (a : α) : a ∈ (normalize f hf0 hf).support ↔ f a ≠ 0 := by | simp
|
import Mathlib.Order.Heyting.Basic
#align_import order.boolean_algebra from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9ac7c0c8c4d7a535ec3e5b34b8859aab9233b2f4"
open Function OrderDual
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type*} {w x y z : α}
class GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra (α : Type u) extends DistribLattice α, SDiff α, Bot α where
sup_inf_sdiff : ∀ a b : α, a ⊓ b ⊔ a \ b = a
inf_inf_sdiff : ∀ a b : α, a ⊓ b ⊓ a \ b = ⊥
#align generalized_boolean_algebra GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
-- We might want an `IsCompl_of` predicate (for relative complements) generalizing `IsCompl`,
-- however we'd need another type class for lattices with bot, and all the API for that.
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α]
@[simp]
theorem sup_inf_sdiff (x y : α) : x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y = x :=
GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.sup_inf_sdiff _ _
#align sup_inf_sdiff sup_inf_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem inf_inf_sdiff (x y : α) : x ⊓ y ⊓ x \ y = ⊥ :=
GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.inf_inf_sdiff _ _
#align inf_inf_sdiff inf_inf_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_inf (x y : α) : x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ y = x := by rw [sup_comm, sup_inf_sdiff]
#align sup_sdiff_inf sup_sdiff_inf
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_inf (x y : α) : x \ y ⊓ (x ⊓ y) = ⊥ := by rw [inf_comm, inf_inf_sdiff]
#align inf_sdiff_inf inf_sdiff_inf
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toOrderBot : OrderBot α where
__ := GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toBot
bot_le a := by
rw [← inf_inf_sdiff a a, inf_assoc]
exact inf_le_left
#align generalized_boolean_algebra.to_order_bot GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toOrderBot
theorem disjoint_inf_sdiff : Disjoint (x ⊓ y) (x \ y) :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr (inf_inf_sdiff x y).le
#align disjoint_inf_sdiff disjoint_inf_sdiff
-- TODO: in distributive lattices, relative complements are unique when they exist
theorem sdiff_unique (s : x ⊓ y ⊔ z = x) (i : x ⊓ y ⊓ z = ⊥) : x \ y = z := by
conv_rhs at s => rw [← sup_inf_sdiff x y, sup_comm]
rw [sup_comm] at s
conv_rhs at i => rw [← inf_inf_sdiff x y, inf_comm]
rw [inf_comm] at i
exact (eq_of_inf_eq_sup_eq i s).symm
#align sdiff_unique sdiff_unique
-- Use `sdiff_le`
private theorem sdiff_le' : x \ y ≤ x :=
calc
x \ y ≤ x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y := le_sup_right
_ = x := sup_inf_sdiff x y
-- Use `sdiff_sup_self`
private theorem sdiff_sup_self' : y \ x ⊔ x = y ⊔ x :=
calc
y \ x ⊔ x = y \ x ⊔ (x ⊔ x ⊓ y) := by rw [sup_inf_self]
_ = y ⊓ x ⊔ y \ x ⊔ x := by ac_rfl
_ = y ⊔ x := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_sdiff : x \ y ⊓ y \ x = ⊥ :=
Eq.symm <|
calc
⊥ = x ⊓ y ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_inf_sdiff]
_ = x ⊓ (y ⊓ x ⊔ y \ x) ⊓ x \ y := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = (x ⊓ (y ⊓ x) ⊔ x ⊓ y \ x) ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_sup_left]
_ = (y ⊓ (x ⊓ x) ⊔ x ⊓ y \ x) ⊓ x \ y := by ac_rfl
_ = (y ⊓ x ⊔ x ⊓ y \ x) ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_idem]
_ = x ⊓ y ⊓ x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ y \ x ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_sup_right, inf_comm x y]
_ = x ⊓ y \ x ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_inf_sdiff, bot_sup_eq]
_ = x ⊓ x \ y ⊓ y \ x := by ac_rfl
_ = x \ y ⊓ y \ x := by rw [inf_of_le_right sdiff_le']
#align sdiff_inf_sdiff sdiff_inf_sdiff
theorem disjoint_sdiff_sdiff : Disjoint (x \ y) (y \ x) :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr sdiff_inf_sdiff.le
#align disjoint_sdiff_sdiff disjoint_sdiff_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_self_right : x ⊓ y \ x = ⊥ :=
calc
x ⊓ y \ x = (x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y) ⊓ y \ x := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = x ⊓ y ⊓ y \ x ⊔ x \ y ⊓ y \ x := by rw [inf_sup_right]
_ = ⊥ := by rw [inf_comm x y, inf_inf_sdiff, sdiff_inf_sdiff, bot_sup_eq]
#align inf_sdiff_self_right inf_sdiff_self_right
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_self_left : y \ x ⊓ x = ⊥ := by rw [inf_comm, inf_sdiff_self_right]
#align inf_sdiff_self_left inf_sdiff_self_left
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra :
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α where
__ := ‹GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α›
__ := GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toOrderBot
sdiff := (· \ ·)
sdiff_le_iff y x z :=
⟨fun h =>
le_of_inf_le_sup_le
(le_of_eq
(calc
y ⊓ y \ x = y \ x := inf_of_le_right sdiff_le'
_ = x ⊓ y \ x ⊔ z ⊓ y \ x := by
rw [inf_eq_right.2 h, inf_sdiff_self_right, bot_sup_eq]
_ = (x ⊔ z) ⊓ y \ x := by rw [← inf_sup_right]))
(calc
y ⊔ y \ x = y := sup_of_le_left sdiff_le'
_ ≤ y ⊔ (x ⊔ z) := le_sup_left
_ = y \ x ⊔ x ⊔ z := by rw [← sup_assoc, ← @sdiff_sup_self' _ x y]
_ = x ⊔ z ⊔ y \ x := by ac_rfl),
fun h =>
le_of_inf_le_sup_le
(calc
y \ x ⊓ x = ⊥ := inf_sdiff_self_left
_ ≤ z ⊓ x := bot_le)
(calc
y \ x ⊔ x = y ⊔ x := sdiff_sup_self'
_ ≤ x ⊔ z ⊔ x := sup_le_sup_right h x
_ ≤ z ⊔ x := by rw [sup_assoc, sup_comm, sup_assoc, sup_idem])⟩
#align generalized_boolean_algebra.to_generalized_coheyting_algebra GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
theorem disjoint_sdiff_self_left : Disjoint (y \ x) x :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr inf_sdiff_self_left.le
#align disjoint_sdiff_self_left disjoint_sdiff_self_left
theorem disjoint_sdiff_self_right : Disjoint x (y \ x) :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr inf_sdiff_self_right.le
#align disjoint_sdiff_self_right disjoint_sdiff_self_right
lemma le_sdiff : x ≤ y \ z ↔ x ≤ y ∧ Disjoint x z :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.trans sdiff_le, disjoint_sdiff_self_left.mono_left h⟩, fun h ↦
by rw [← h.2.sdiff_eq_left]; exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h.1⟩
#align le_sdiff le_sdiff
@[simp] lemma sdiff_eq_left : x \ y = x ↔ Disjoint x y :=
⟨fun h ↦ disjoint_sdiff_self_left.mono_left h.ge, Disjoint.sdiff_eq_left⟩
#align sdiff_eq_left sdiff_eq_left
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_of_sup_eq (hi : Disjoint x z) (hs : x ⊔ z = y) : y \ x = z :=
have h : y ⊓ x = x := inf_eq_right.2 <| le_sup_left.trans hs.le
sdiff_unique (by rw [h, hs]) (by rw [h, hi.eq_bot])
#align disjoint.sdiff_eq_of_sup_eq Disjoint.sdiff_eq_of_sup_eq
protected theorem Disjoint.sdiff_unique (hd : Disjoint x z) (hz : z ≤ y) (hs : y ≤ x ⊔ z) :
y \ x = z :=
sdiff_unique
(by
rw [← inf_eq_right] at hs
rwa [sup_inf_right, inf_sup_right, sup_comm x, inf_sup_self, inf_comm, sup_comm z,
hs, sup_eq_left])
(by rw [inf_assoc, hd.eq_bot, inf_bot_eq])
#align disjoint.sdiff_unique Disjoint.sdiff_unique
-- cf. `IsCompl.disjoint_left_iff` and `IsCompl.disjoint_right_iff`
theorem disjoint_sdiff_iff_le (hz : z ≤ y) (hx : x ≤ y) : Disjoint z (y \ x) ↔ z ≤ x :=
⟨fun H =>
le_of_inf_le_sup_le (le_trans H.le_bot bot_le)
(by
rw [sup_sdiff_cancel_right hx]
refine le_trans (sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le z) ?_
rw [sup_eq_right.2 hz]),
fun H => disjoint_sdiff_self_right.mono_left H⟩
#align disjoint_sdiff_iff_le disjoint_sdiff_iff_le
-- cf. `IsCompl.le_left_iff` and `IsCompl.le_right_iff`
theorem le_iff_disjoint_sdiff (hz : z ≤ y) (hx : x ≤ y) : z ≤ x ↔ Disjoint z (y \ x) :=
(disjoint_sdiff_iff_le hz hx).symm
#align le_iff_disjoint_sdiff le_iff_disjoint_sdiff
-- cf. `IsCompl.inf_left_eq_bot_iff` and `IsCompl.inf_right_eq_bot_iff`
theorem inf_sdiff_eq_bot_iff (hz : z ≤ y) (hx : x ≤ y) : z ⊓ y \ x = ⊥ ↔ z ≤ x := by
rw [← disjoint_iff]
exact disjoint_sdiff_iff_le hz hx
#align inf_sdiff_eq_bot_iff inf_sdiff_eq_bot_iff
-- cf. `IsCompl.left_le_iff` and `IsCompl.right_le_iff`
theorem le_iff_eq_sup_sdiff (hz : z ≤ y) (hx : x ≤ y) : x ≤ z ↔ y = z ⊔ y \ x :=
⟨fun H => by
apply le_antisymm
· conv_lhs => rw [← sup_inf_sdiff y x]
apply sup_le_sup_right
rwa [inf_eq_right.2 hx]
· apply le_trans
· apply sup_le_sup_right hz
· rw [sup_sdiff_left],
fun H => by
conv_lhs at H => rw [← sup_sdiff_cancel_right hx]
refine le_of_inf_le_sup_le ?_ H.le
rw [inf_sdiff_self_right]
exact bot_le⟩
#align le_iff_eq_sup_sdiff le_iff_eq_sup_sdiff
-- cf. `IsCompl.sup_inf`
theorem sdiff_sup : y \ (x ⊔ z) = y \ x ⊓ y \ z :=
sdiff_unique
(calc
y ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ⊔ y \ x ⊓ y \ z = (y ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ⊔ y \ x) ⊓ (y ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ⊔ y \ z) := by
rw [sup_inf_left]
_ = (y ⊓ x ⊔ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ x) ⊓ (y ⊓ x ⊔ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z) := by rw [@inf_sup_left _ _ y]
_ = (y ⊓ z ⊔ (y ⊓ x ⊔ y \ x)) ⊓ (y ⊓ x ⊔ (y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z)) := by ac_rfl
_ = (y ⊓ z ⊔ y) ⊓ (y ⊓ x ⊔ y) := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff, sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = (y ⊔ y ⊓ z) ⊓ (y ⊔ y ⊓ x) := by ac_rfl
_ = y := by rw [sup_inf_self, sup_inf_self, inf_idem])
(calc
y ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ⊓ (y \ x ⊓ y \ z) = (y ⊓ x ⊔ y ⊓ z) ⊓ (y \ x ⊓ y \ z) := by rw [inf_sup_left]
_ = y ⊓ x ⊓ (y \ x ⊓ y \ z) ⊔ y ⊓ z ⊓ (y \ x ⊓ y \ z) := by rw [inf_sup_right]
_ = y ⊓ x ⊓ y \ x ⊓ y \ z ⊔ y \ x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ (y ⊓ z)) := by ac_rfl
_ = ⊥ := by rw [inf_inf_sdiff, bot_inf_eq, bot_sup_eq, inf_comm (y \ z),
inf_inf_sdiff, inf_bot_eq])
#align sdiff_sup sdiff_sup
theorem sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff_inf_eq_inf : y \ x = y \ z ↔ y ⊓ x = y ⊓ z :=
⟨fun h => eq_of_inf_eq_sup_eq (by rw [inf_inf_sdiff, h, inf_inf_sdiff])
(by rw [sup_inf_sdiff, h, sup_inf_sdiff]),
fun h => by rw [← sdiff_inf_self_right, ← sdiff_inf_self_right z y, inf_comm, h, inf_comm]⟩
#align sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff_inf_eq_inf sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff_inf_eq_inf
theorem sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint : x \ y = x ↔ Disjoint y x :=
calc
x \ y = x ↔ x \ y = x \ ⊥ := by rw [sdiff_bot]
_ ↔ x ⊓ y = x ⊓ ⊥ := sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff_inf_eq_inf
_ ↔ Disjoint y x := by rw [inf_bot_eq, inf_comm, disjoint_iff]
#align sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint
theorem sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint' : x \ y = x ↔ Disjoint x y := by
rw [sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint, disjoint_comm]
#align sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint' sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint'
theorem sdiff_lt (hx : y ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ ⊥) : x \ y < x := by
refine sdiff_le.lt_of_ne fun h => hy ?_
rw [sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint', disjoint_iff] at h
rw [← h, inf_eq_right.mpr hx]
#align sdiff_lt sdiff_lt
@[simp]
theorem le_sdiff_iff : x ≤ y \ x ↔ x = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => disjoint_self.1 (disjoint_sdiff_self_right.mono_right h), fun h => h.le.trans bot_le⟩
#align le_sdiff_iff le_sdiff_iff
@[simp] lemma sdiff_eq_right : x \ y = y ↔ x = ⊥ ∧ y = ⊥ := by
rw [disjoint_sdiff_self_left.eq_iff]; aesop
lemma sdiff_ne_right : x \ y ≠ y ↔ x ≠ ⊥ ∨ y ≠ ⊥ := sdiff_eq_right.not.trans not_and_or
theorem sdiff_lt_sdiff_right (h : x < y) (hz : z ≤ x) : x \ z < y \ z :=
(sdiff_le_sdiff_right h.le).lt_of_not_le
fun h' => h.not_le <| le_sdiff_sup.trans <| sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right h' hz
#align sdiff_lt_sdiff_right sdiff_lt_sdiff_right
theorem sup_inf_inf_sdiff : x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z = x ⊓ y ⊔ y \ z :=
calc
x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z = x ⊓ (y ⊓ z) ⊔ y \ z := by rw [inf_assoc]
_ = (x ⊔ y \ z) ⊓ y := by rw [sup_inf_right, sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = x ⊓ y ⊔ y \ z := by rw [inf_sup_right, inf_sdiff_left]
#align sup_inf_inf_sdiff sup_inf_inf_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff_right : x \ (y \ z) = x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ y ⊓ z := by
rw [sup_comm, inf_comm, ← inf_assoc, sup_inf_inf_sdiff]
apply sdiff_unique
· calc
x ⊓ y \ z ⊔ (z ⊓ x ⊔ x \ y) = (x ⊔ (z ⊓ x ⊔ x \ y)) ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (z ⊓ x ⊔ x \ y)) := by
rw [sup_inf_right]
_ = (x ⊔ x ⊓ z ⊔ x \ y) ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (x ⊓ z ⊔ x \ y)) := by ac_rfl
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ x ⊓ z ⊔ x \ y) := by rw [sup_inf_self, sup_sdiff_left, ← sup_assoc]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ (z ⊔ y) ⊔ x ⊓ (z ⊔ y) ⊔ x \ y) := by
rw [sup_inf_left, sdiff_sup_self', inf_sup_right, sup_comm y]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (x ⊓ z ⊔ x ⊓ y) ⊔ x \ y) := by
rw [inf_sdiff_sup_right, @inf_sup_left _ _ x z y]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (x ⊓ z ⊔ (x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y))) := by ac_rfl
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (x ⊔ x ⊓ z)) := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff, sup_comm (x ⊓ z)]
_ = x := by rw [sup_inf_self, sup_comm, inf_sup_self]
· calc
x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ (z ⊓ x ⊔ x \ y) = x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ (z ⊓ x) ⊔ x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_sup_left]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ z ⊓ x) ⊔ x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ x \ y := by ac_rfl
_ = x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_sdiff_self_left, bot_inf_eq, inf_bot_eq, bot_sup_eq]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ y) ⊓ x \ y := by conv_lhs => rw [← inf_sdiff_left]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ (y ⊓ x \ y)) := by ac_rfl
_ = ⊥ := by rw [inf_sdiff_self_right, inf_bot_eq, inf_bot_eq]
#align sdiff_sdiff_right sdiff_sdiff_right
theorem sdiff_sdiff_right' : x \ (y \ z) = x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ z :=
calc
x \ (y \ z) = x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ y ⊓ z := sdiff_sdiff_right
_ = z ⊓ x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y := by ac_rfl
_ = x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ z := by rw [sup_inf_inf_sdiff, sup_comm, inf_comm]
#align sdiff_sdiff_right' sdiff_sdiff_right'
theorem sdiff_sdiff_eq_sdiff_sup (h : z ≤ x) : x \ (y \ z) = x \ y ⊔ z := by
rw [sdiff_sdiff_right', inf_eq_right.2 h]
#align sdiff_sdiff_eq_sdiff_sup sdiff_sdiff_eq_sdiff_sup
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_right_self : x \ (x \ y) = x ⊓ y := by
rw [sdiff_sdiff_right, inf_idem, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq]
#align sdiff_sdiff_right_self sdiff_sdiff_right_self
theorem sdiff_sdiff_eq_self (h : y ≤ x) : x \ (x \ y) = y := by
rw [sdiff_sdiff_right_self, inf_of_le_right h]
#align sdiff_sdiff_eq_self sdiff_sdiff_eq_self
theorem sdiff_eq_symm (hy : y ≤ x) (h : x \ y = z) : x \ z = y := by
rw [← h, sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hy]
#align sdiff_eq_symm sdiff_eq_symm
theorem sdiff_eq_comm (hy : y ≤ x) (hz : z ≤ x) : x \ y = z ↔ x \ z = y :=
⟨sdiff_eq_symm hy, sdiff_eq_symm hz⟩
#align sdiff_eq_comm sdiff_eq_comm
theorem eq_of_sdiff_eq_sdiff (hxz : x ≤ z) (hyz : y ≤ z) (h : z \ x = z \ y) : x = y := by
rw [← sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hxz, h, sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hyz]
#align eq_of_sdiff_eq_sdiff eq_of_sdiff_eq_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff_left' : (x \ y) \ z = x \ y ⊓ x \ z := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_left, sdiff_sup]
#align sdiff_sdiff_left' sdiff_sdiff_left'
theorem sdiff_sdiff_sup_sdiff : z \ (x \ y ⊔ y \ x) = z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ x) :=
calc
z \ (x \ y ⊔ y \ x) = (z \ x ⊔ z ⊓ x ⊓ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x) := by
rw [sdiff_sup, sdiff_sdiff_right, sdiff_sdiff_right]
_ = z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x) := by rw [sup_inf_left, sup_comm, sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ x)) := by
rw [sup_inf_left, sup_comm (z \ y), sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = z ⊓ z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ x) := by ac_rfl
_ = z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ x) := by rw [inf_idem]
#align sdiff_sdiff_sup_sdiff sdiff_sdiff_sup_sdiff
| Mathlib/Order/BooleanAlgebra.lean | 417 | 423 | theorem sdiff_sdiff_sup_sdiff' : z \ (x \ y ⊔ y \ x) = z ⊓ x ⊓ y ⊔ z \ x ⊓ z \ y :=
calc
z \ (x \ y ⊔ y \ x) = z \ (x \ y) ⊓ z \ (y \ x) := sdiff_sup
_ = (z \ x ⊔ z ⊓ x ⊓ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x) := by | rw [sdiff_sdiff_right, sdiff_sdiff_right]
_ = (z \ x ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x) := by ac_rfl
_ = z \ x ⊓ z \ y ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x := by rw [← sup_inf_right]
_ = z ⊓ x ⊓ y ⊔ z \ x ⊓ z \ y := by ac_rfl
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Basic
universe u
namespace Profinite
variable {ι : Type u} {X : ι → Type} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] (C : Set ((i : ι) → X i))
(J K : ι → Prop)
namespace IndexFunctor
open ContinuousMap
def obj : Set ((i : {i : ι // J i}) → X i) := ContinuousMap.precomp (Subtype.val (p := J)) '' C
def π_app : C(C, obj C J) :=
⟨Set.MapsTo.restrict (precomp (Subtype.val (p := J))) _ _ (Set.mapsTo_image _ _),
Continuous.restrict _ (Pi.continuous_precomp' _)⟩
variable {J K}
def map (h : ∀ i, J i → K i) : C(obj C K, obj C J) :=
⟨Set.MapsTo.restrict (precomp (Set.inclusion h)) _ _ (fun _ hx ↦ by
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hx
rw [← hy.2]
exact ⟨y, hy.1, rfl⟩), Continuous.restrict _ (Pi.continuous_precomp' _)⟩
theorem surjective_π_app :
Function.Surjective (π_app C J) := by
intro x
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := x.prop
exact ⟨⟨y, hy.1⟩, Subtype.ext hy.2⟩
theorem map_comp_π_app (h : ∀ i, J i → K i) : map C h ∘ π_app C K = π_app C J := rfl
variable {C}
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/Profinite/Product.lean | 68 | 75 | theorem eq_of_forall_π_app_eq (a b : C)
(h : ∀ (J : Finset ι), π_app C (· ∈ J) a = π_app C (· ∈ J) b) : a = b := by |
ext i
specialize h ({i} : Finset ι)
rw [Subtype.ext_iff] at h
simp only [π_app, ContinuousMap.precomp, ContinuousMap.coe_mk,
Set.MapsTo.val_restrict_apply] at h
exact congr_fun h ⟨i, Finset.mem_singleton.mpr rfl⟩
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Prod
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Defs
#align_import group_theory.group_action.prod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"aba57d4d3dae35460225919dcd82fe91355162f9"
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
variable {M N P E α β : Type*}
namespace Prod
section
variable [SMul M α] [SMul M β] [SMul N α] [SMul N β] (a : M) (x : α × β)
@[to_additive]
instance smul : SMul M (α × β) :=
⟨fun a p => (a • p.1, a • p.2)⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_fst : (a • x).1 = a • x.1 :=
rfl
#align prod.smul_fst Prod.smul_fst
#align prod.vadd_fst Prod.vadd_fst
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_snd : (a • x).2 = a • x.2 :=
rfl
#align prod.smul_snd Prod.smul_snd
#align prod.vadd_snd Prod.vadd_snd
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_mk (a : M) (b : α) (c : β) : a • (b, c) = (a • b, a • c) :=
rfl
#align prod.smul_mk Prod.smul_mk
#align prod.vadd_mk Prod.vadd_mk
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_def (a : M) (x : α × β) : a • x = (a • x.1, a • x.2) :=
rfl
#align prod.smul_def Prod.smul_def
#align prod.vadd_def Prod.vadd_def
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_swap : (a • x).swap = a • x.swap :=
rfl
#align prod.smul_swap Prod.smul_swap
#align prod.vadd_swap Prod.vadd_swap
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/GroupAction/Prod.lean | 76 | 77 | theorem smul_zero_mk {α : Type*} [Monoid M] [AddMonoid α] [DistribMulAction M α] (a : M) (c : β) :
a • ((0 : α), c) = (0, a • c) := by | rw [Prod.smul_mk, smul_zero]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Star.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Basic
#align_import data.is_R_or_C.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"baa88307f3e699fa7054ef04ec79fa4f056169cb"
section
local notation "𝓚" => algebraMap ℝ _
open ComplexConjugate
class RCLike (K : semiOutParam Type*) extends DenselyNormedField K, StarRing K,
NormedAlgebra ℝ K, CompleteSpace K where
re : K →+ ℝ
im : K →+ ℝ
I : K
I_re_ax : re I = 0
I_mul_I_ax : I = 0 ∨ I * I = -1
re_add_im_ax : ∀ z : K, 𝓚 (re z) + 𝓚 (im z) * I = z
ofReal_re_ax : ∀ r : ℝ, re (𝓚 r) = r
ofReal_im_ax : ∀ r : ℝ, im (𝓚 r) = 0
mul_re_ax : ∀ z w : K, re (z * w) = re z * re w - im z * im w
mul_im_ax : ∀ z w : K, im (z * w) = re z * im w + im z * re w
conj_re_ax : ∀ z : K, re (conj z) = re z
conj_im_ax : ∀ z : K, im (conj z) = -im z
conj_I_ax : conj I = -I
norm_sq_eq_def_ax : ∀ z : K, ‖z‖ ^ 2 = re z * re z + im z * im z
mul_im_I_ax : ∀ z : K, im z * im I = im z
[toPartialOrder : PartialOrder K]
le_iff_re_im {z w : K} : z ≤ w ↔ re z ≤ re w ∧ im z = im w
-- note we cannot put this in the `extends` clause
[toDecidableEq : DecidableEq K]
#align is_R_or_C RCLike
scoped[ComplexOrder] attribute [instance 100] RCLike.toPartialOrder
attribute [instance 100] RCLike.toDecidableEq
end
variable {K E : Type*} [RCLike K]
namespace RCLike
open ComplexConjugate
@[coe] abbrev ofReal : ℝ → K := Algebra.cast
noncomputable instance (priority := 900) algebraMapCoe : CoeTC ℝ K :=
⟨ofReal⟩
#align is_R_or_C.algebra_map_coe RCLike.algebraMapCoe
theorem ofReal_alg (x : ℝ) : (x : K) = x • (1 : K) :=
Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one x
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_alg RCLike.ofReal_alg
theorem real_smul_eq_coe_mul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : r • z = (r : K) * z :=
Algebra.smul_def r z
#align is_R_or_C.real_smul_eq_coe_mul RCLike.real_smul_eq_coe_mul
theorem real_smul_eq_coe_smul [AddCommGroup E] [Module K E] [Module ℝ E] [IsScalarTower ℝ K E]
(r : ℝ) (x : E) : r • x = (r : K) • x := by rw [RCLike.ofReal_alg, smul_one_smul]
#align is_R_or_C.real_smul_eq_coe_smul RCLike.real_smul_eq_coe_smul
theorem algebraMap_eq_ofReal : ⇑(algebraMap ℝ K) = ofReal :=
rfl
#align is_R_or_C.algebra_map_eq_of_real RCLike.algebraMap_eq_ofReal
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem re_add_im (z : K) : (re z : K) + im z * I = z :=
RCLike.re_add_im_ax z
#align is_R_or_C.re_add_im RCLike.re_add_im
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_re : ∀ r : ℝ, re (r : K) = r :=
RCLike.ofReal_re_ax
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_re RCLike.ofReal_re
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_im : ∀ r : ℝ, im (r : K) = 0 :=
RCLike.ofReal_im_ax
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_im RCLike.ofReal_im
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem mul_re : ∀ z w : K, re (z * w) = re z * re w - im z * im w :=
RCLike.mul_re_ax
#align is_R_or_C.mul_re RCLike.mul_re
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem mul_im : ∀ z w : K, im (z * w) = re z * im w + im z * re w :=
RCLike.mul_im_ax
#align is_R_or_C.mul_im RCLike.mul_im
theorem ext_iff {z w : K} : z = w ↔ re z = re w ∧ im z = im w :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => re_add_im z ▸ re_add_im w ▸ h₁ ▸ h₂ ▸ rfl⟩
#align is_R_or_C.ext_iff RCLike.ext_iff
theorem ext {z w : K} (hre : re z = re w) (him : im z = im w) : z = w :=
ext_iff.2 ⟨hre, him⟩
#align is_R_or_C.ext RCLike.ext
@[norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_zero : ((0 : ℝ) : K) = 0 :=
algebraMap.coe_zero
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_zero RCLike.ofReal_zero
@[rclike_simps]
theorem zero_re' : re (0 : K) = (0 : ℝ) :=
map_zero re
#align is_R_or_C.zero_re' RCLike.zero_re'
@[norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_one : ((1 : ℝ) : K) = 1 :=
map_one (algebraMap ℝ K)
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_one RCLike.ofReal_one
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem one_re : re (1 : K) = 1 := by rw [← ofReal_one, ofReal_re]
#align is_R_or_C.one_re RCLike.one_re
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem one_im : im (1 : K) = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_one, ofReal_im]
#align is_R_or_C.one_im RCLike.one_im
theorem ofReal_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : ℝ → K) :=
(algebraMap ℝ K).injective
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_injective RCLike.ofReal_injective
@[norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_inj {z w : ℝ} : (z : K) = (w : K) ↔ z = w :=
algebraMap.coe_inj
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_inj RCLike.ofReal_inj
-- replaced by `RCLike.ofNat_re`
#noalign is_R_or_C.bit0_re
#noalign is_R_or_C.bit1_re
-- replaced by `RCLike.ofNat_im`
#noalign is_R_or_C.bit0_im
#noalign is_R_or_C.bit1_im
theorem ofReal_eq_zero {x : ℝ} : (x : K) = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
algebraMap.lift_map_eq_zero_iff x
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_eq_zero RCLike.ofReal_eq_zero
theorem ofReal_ne_zero {x : ℝ} : (x : K) ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
ofReal_eq_zero.not
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_ne_zero RCLike.ofReal_ne_zero
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_add (r s : ℝ) : ((r + s : ℝ) : K) = r + s :=
algebraMap.coe_add _ _
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_add RCLike.ofReal_add
-- replaced by `RCLike.ofReal_ofNat`
#noalign is_R_or_C.of_real_bit0
#noalign is_R_or_C.of_real_bit1
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_neg (r : ℝ) : ((-r : ℝ) : K) = -r :=
algebraMap.coe_neg r
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_neg RCLike.ofReal_neg
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_sub (r s : ℝ) : ((r - s : ℝ) : K) = r - s :=
map_sub (algebraMap ℝ K) r s
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_sub RCLike.ofReal_sub
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_sum {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) :
((∑ i ∈ s, f i : ℝ) : K) = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i : K) :=
map_sum (algebraMap ℝ K) _ _
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_sum RCLike.ofReal_sum
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_finsupp_sum {α M : Type*} [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M) (g : α → M → ℝ) :
((f.sum fun a b => g a b : ℝ) : K) = f.sum fun a b => (g a b : K) :=
map_finsupp_sum (algebraMap ℝ K) f g
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_finsupp_sum RCLike.ofReal_finsupp_sum
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_mul (r s : ℝ) : ((r * s : ℝ) : K) = r * s :=
algebraMap.coe_mul _ _
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_mul RCLike.ofReal_mul
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_pow (r : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ((r ^ n : ℝ) : K) = (r : K) ^ n :=
map_pow (algebraMap ℝ K) r n
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_pow RCLike.ofReal_pow
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_prod {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) :
((∏ i ∈ s, f i : ℝ) : K) = ∏ i ∈ s, (f i : K) :=
map_prod (algebraMap ℝ K) _ _
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_prod RCLike.ofReal_prod
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_finsupp_prod {α M : Type*} [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M) (g : α → M → ℝ) :
((f.prod fun a b => g a b : ℝ) : K) = f.prod fun a b => (g a b : K) :=
map_finsupp_prod _ f g
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_finsupp_prod RCLike.ofReal_finsupp_prod
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem real_smul_ofReal (r x : ℝ) : r • (x : K) = (r : K) * (x : K) :=
real_smul_eq_coe_mul _ _
#align is_R_or_C.real_smul_of_real RCLike.real_smul_ofReal
@[rclike_simps]
theorem re_ofReal_mul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : re (↑r * z) = r * re z := by
simp only [mul_re, ofReal_im, zero_mul, ofReal_re, sub_zero]
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_mul_re RCLike.re_ofReal_mul
@[rclike_simps]
theorem im_ofReal_mul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : im (↑r * z) = r * im z := by
simp only [add_zero, ofReal_im, zero_mul, ofReal_re, mul_im]
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_mul_im RCLike.im_ofReal_mul
@[rclike_simps]
theorem smul_re (r : ℝ) (z : K) : re (r • z) = r * re z := by
rw [real_smul_eq_coe_mul, re_ofReal_mul]
#align is_R_or_C.smul_re RCLike.smul_re
@[rclike_simps]
theorem smul_im (r : ℝ) (z : K) : im (r • z) = r * im z := by
rw [real_smul_eq_coe_mul, im_ofReal_mul]
#align is_R_or_C.smul_im RCLike.smul_im
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem norm_ofReal (r : ℝ) : ‖(r : K)‖ = |r| :=
norm_algebraMap' K r
#align is_R_or_C.norm_of_real RCLike.norm_ofReal
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) charZero_rclike : CharZero K :=
(RingHom.charZero_iff (algebraMap ℝ K).injective).1 inferInstance
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align is_R_or_C.char_zero_R_or_C RCLike.charZero_rclike
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem I_re : re (I : K) = 0 :=
I_re_ax
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align is_R_or_C.I_re RCLike.I_re
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem I_im (z : K) : im z * im (I : K) = im z :=
mul_im_I_ax z
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align is_R_or_C.I_im RCLike.I_im
@[simp, rclike_simps]
| Mathlib/Analysis/RCLike/Basic.lean | 301 | 301 | theorem I_im' (z : K) : im (I : K) * im z = im z := by | rw [mul_comm, I_im]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Asymptotics
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.AsymptoticEquivalent
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.SpecificAsymptotics
#align_import analysis.special_functions.compare_exp from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0b9eaaa7686280fad8cce467f5c3c57ee6ce77f8"
open Asymptotics Filter Function
open scoped Topology
namespace Complex
structure IsExpCmpFilter (l : Filter ℂ) : Prop where
tendsto_re : Tendsto re l atTop
isBigO_im_pow_re : ∀ n : ℕ, (fun z : ℂ => z.im ^ n) =O[l] fun z => Real.exp z.re
#align complex.is_exp_cmp_filter Complex.IsExpCmpFilter
namespace IsExpCmpFilter
variable {l : Filter ℂ}
theorem of_isBigO_im_re_rpow (hre : Tendsto re l atTop) (r : ℝ) (hr : im =O[l] fun z => z.re ^ r) :
IsExpCmpFilter l :=
⟨hre, fun n =>
IsLittleO.isBigO <|
calc
(fun z : ℂ => z.im ^ n) =O[l] fun z => (z.re ^ r) ^ n := hr.pow n
_ =ᶠ[l] fun z => z.re ^ (r * n) :=
((hre.eventually_ge_atTop 0).mono fun z hz => by
simp only [Real.rpow_mul hz r n, Real.rpow_natCast])
_ =o[l] fun z => Real.exp z.re := (isLittleO_rpow_exp_atTop _).comp_tendsto hre ⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.is_exp_cmp_filter.of_is_O_im_re_rpow Complex.IsExpCmpFilter.of_isBigO_im_re_rpow
theorem of_isBigO_im_re_pow (hre : Tendsto re l atTop) (n : ℕ) (hr : im =O[l] fun z => z.re ^ n) :
IsExpCmpFilter l :=
of_isBigO_im_re_rpow hre n <| mod_cast hr
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.is_exp_cmp_filter.of_is_O_im_re_pow Complex.IsExpCmpFilter.of_isBigO_im_re_pow
theorem of_boundedUnder_abs_im (hre : Tendsto re l atTop)
(him : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l fun z => |z.im|) : IsExpCmpFilter l :=
of_isBigO_im_re_pow hre 0 <| by
simpa only [pow_zero] using him.isBigO_const (f := im) one_ne_zero
#align complex.is_exp_cmp_filter.of_bounded_under_abs_im Complex.IsExpCmpFilter.of_boundedUnder_abs_im
theorem of_boundedUnder_im (hre : Tendsto re l atTop) (him_le : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l im)
(him_ge : IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l im) : IsExpCmpFilter l :=
of_boundedUnder_abs_im hre <| isBoundedUnder_le_abs.2 ⟨him_le, him_ge⟩
#align complex.is_exp_cmp_filter.of_bounded_under_im Complex.IsExpCmpFilter.of_boundedUnder_im
theorem eventually_ne (hl : IsExpCmpFilter l) : ∀ᶠ w : ℂ in l, w ≠ 0 :=
hl.tendsto_re.eventually_ne_atTop' _
#align complex.is_exp_cmp_filter.eventually_ne Complex.IsExpCmpFilter.eventually_ne
theorem tendsto_abs_re (hl : IsExpCmpFilter l) : Tendsto (fun z : ℂ => |z.re|) l atTop :=
tendsto_abs_atTop_atTop.comp hl.tendsto_re
#align complex.is_exp_cmp_filter.tendsto_abs_re Complex.IsExpCmpFilter.tendsto_abs_re
theorem tendsto_abs (hl : IsExpCmpFilter l) : Tendsto abs l atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_mono abs_re_le_abs hl.tendsto_abs_re
#align complex.is_exp_cmp_filter.tendsto_abs Complex.IsExpCmpFilter.tendsto_abs
theorem isLittleO_log_re_re (hl : IsExpCmpFilter l) : (fun z => Real.log z.re) =o[l] re :=
Real.isLittleO_log_id_atTop.comp_tendsto hl.tendsto_re
#align complex.is_exp_cmp_filter.is_o_log_re_re Complex.IsExpCmpFilter.isLittleO_log_re_re
theorem isLittleO_im_pow_exp_re (hl : IsExpCmpFilter l) (n : ℕ) :
(fun z : ℂ => z.im ^ n) =o[l] fun z => Real.exp z.re :=
flip IsLittleO.of_pow two_ne_zero <|
calc
(fun z : ℂ ↦ (z.im ^ n) ^ 2) = (fun z ↦ z.im ^ (2 * n)) := by simp only [pow_mul']
_ =O[l] fun z ↦ Real.exp z.re := hl.isBigO_im_pow_re _
_ = fun z ↦ (Real.exp z.re) ^ 1 := by simp only [pow_one]
_ =o[l] fun z ↦ (Real.exp z.re) ^ 2 :=
(isLittleO_pow_pow_atTop_of_lt one_lt_two).comp_tendsto <|
Real.tendsto_exp_atTop.comp hl.tendsto_re
#align complex.is_exp_cmp_filter.is_o_im_pow_exp_re Complex.IsExpCmpFilter.isLittleO_im_pow_exp_re
theorem abs_im_pow_eventuallyLE_exp_re (hl : IsExpCmpFilter l) (n : ℕ) :
(fun z : ℂ => |z.im| ^ n) ≤ᶠ[l] fun z => Real.exp z.re := by
simpa using (hl.isLittleO_im_pow_exp_re n).bound zero_lt_one
#align complex.is_exp_cmp_filter.abs_im_pow_eventually_le_exp_re Complex.IsExpCmpFilter.abs_im_pow_eventuallyLE_exp_re
theorem isLittleO_log_abs_re (hl : IsExpCmpFilter l) : (fun z => Real.log (abs z)) =o[l] re :=
calc
(fun z => Real.log (abs z)) =O[l] fun z => Real.log (√2) + Real.log (max z.re |z.im|) :=
IsBigO.of_bound 1 <|
(hl.tendsto_re.eventually_ge_atTop 1).mono fun z hz => by
have h2 : 0 < √2 := by simp
have hz' : 1 ≤ abs z := hz.trans (re_le_abs z)
have hm₀ : 0 < max z.re |z.im| := lt_max_iff.2 (Or.inl <| one_pos.trans_le hz)
rw [one_mul, Real.norm_eq_abs, _root_.abs_of_nonneg (Real.log_nonneg hz')]
refine le_trans ?_ (le_abs_self _)
rw [← Real.log_mul, Real.log_le_log_iff, ← _root_.abs_of_nonneg (le_trans zero_le_one hz)]
exacts [abs_le_sqrt_two_mul_max z, one_pos.trans_le hz', mul_pos h2 hm₀, h2.ne', hm₀.ne']
_ =o[l] re :=
IsLittleO.add (isLittleO_const_left.2 <| Or.inr <| hl.tendsto_abs_re) <|
isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le.2 fun n => by
filter_upwards [isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le'.1 hl.isLittleO_log_re_re n,
hl.abs_im_pow_eventuallyLE_exp_re n,
hl.tendsto_re.eventually_gt_atTop 1] with z hre him h₁
rcases le_total |z.im| z.re with hle | hle
· rwa [max_eq_left hle]
· have H : 1 < |z.im| := h₁.trans_le hle
norm_cast at *
rwa [max_eq_right hle, Real.norm_eq_abs, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_pos (Real.log_pos H),
← Real.log_pow, Real.log_le_iff_le_exp (pow_pos (one_pos.trans H) _),
abs_of_pos (one_pos.trans h₁)]
#align complex.is_exp_cmp_filter.is_o_log_abs_re Complex.IsExpCmpFilter.isLittleO_log_abs_re
lemma isTheta_cpow_exp_re_mul_log (hl : IsExpCmpFilter l) (a : ℂ) :
(· ^ a) =Θ[l] fun z ↦ Real.exp (re a * Real.log (abs z)) :=
calc
(fun z => z ^ a) =Θ[l] (fun z : ℂ => (abs z ^ re a)) :=
isTheta_cpow_const_rpow fun _ _ => hl.eventually_ne
_ =ᶠ[l] fun z => Real.exp (re a * Real.log (abs z)) :=
(hl.eventually_ne.mono fun z hz => by simp only [Real.rpow_def_of_pos, abs.pos hz, mul_comm])
theorem isLittleO_cpow_exp (hl : IsExpCmpFilter l) (a : ℂ) {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 < b) :
(fun z => z ^ a) =o[l] fun z => exp (b * z) :=
calc
(fun z => z ^ a) =Θ[l] fun z => Real.exp (re a * Real.log (abs z)) :=
hl.isTheta_cpow_exp_re_mul_log a
_ =o[l] fun z => exp (b * z) :=
IsLittleO.of_norm_right <| by
simp only [norm_eq_abs, abs_exp, re_ofReal_mul, Real.isLittleO_exp_comp_exp_comp]
refine (IsEquivalent.refl.sub_isLittleO ?_).symm.tendsto_atTop
(hl.tendsto_re.const_mul_atTop hb)
exact (hl.isLittleO_log_abs_re.const_mul_left _).const_mul_right hb.ne'
#align complex.is_exp_cmp_filter.is_o_cpow_exp Complex.IsExpCmpFilter.isLittleO_cpow_exp
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/CompareExp.lean | 183 | 195 | theorem isLittleO_cpow_mul_exp {b₁ b₂ : ℝ} (hl : IsExpCmpFilter l) (hb : b₁ < b₂) (a₁ a₂ : ℂ) :
(fun z => z ^ a₁ * exp (b₁ * z)) =o[l] fun z => z ^ a₂ * exp (b₂ * z) :=
calc
(fun z => z ^ a₁ * exp (b₁ * z)) =ᶠ[l] fun z => z ^ a₂ * exp (b₁ * z) * z ^ (a₁ - a₂) :=
hl.eventually_ne.mono fun z hz => by
simp only
rw [mul_right_comm, ← cpow_add _ _ hz, add_sub_cancel]
_ =o[l] fun z => z ^ a₂ * exp (b₁ * z) * exp (↑(b₂ - b₁) * z) :=
((isBigO_refl (fun z => z ^ a₂ * exp (b₁ * z)) l).mul_isLittleO <|
hl.isLittleO_cpow_exp _ (sub_pos.2 hb))
_ =ᶠ[l] fun z => z ^ a₂ * exp (b₂ * z) := by |
simp only [ofReal_sub, sub_mul, mul_assoc, ← exp_add, add_sub_cancel]
norm_cast
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Cones
#align_import category_theory.limits.is_limit from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"740acc0e6f9adf4423f92a485d0456fc271482da"
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Functor Opposite
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
-- declare the `v`'s first; see `CategoryTheory.Category` for an explanation
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ v₄ u₁ u₂ u₃ u₄
variable {J : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J] {K : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} K]
variable {C : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} C]
variable {F : J ⥤ C}
-- porting note (#5171): removed @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
structure IsLimit (t : Cone F) where
lift : ∀ s : Cone F, s.pt ⟶ t.pt
fac : ∀ (s : Cone F) (j : J), lift s ≫ t.π.app j = s.π.app j := by aesop_cat
uniq : ∀ (s : Cone F) (m : s.pt ⟶ t.pt) (_ : ∀ j : J, m ≫ t.π.app j = s.π.app j), m = lift s := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.fac' CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.fac
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.uniq' CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.uniq
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this. Linter complains it still exists
attribute [-simp, nolint simpNF] IsLimit.mk.injEq
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] IsLimit.fac
namespace IsLimit
instance subsingleton {t : Cone F} : Subsingleton (IsLimit t) :=
⟨by intro P Q; cases P; cases Q; congr; aesop_cat⟩
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.subsingleton CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.subsingleton
def map {F G : J ⥤ C} (s : Cone F) {t : Cone G} (P : IsLimit t) (α : F ⟶ G) : s.pt ⟶ t.pt :=
P.lift ((Cones.postcompose α).obj s)
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.map CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.map
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem map_π {F G : J ⥤ C} (c : Cone F) {d : Cone G} (hd : IsLimit d) (α : F ⟶ G) (j : J) :
hd.map c α ≫ d.π.app j = c.π.app j ≫ α.app j :=
fac _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.map_π CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.map_π
@[simp]
theorem lift_self {c : Cone F} (t : IsLimit c) : t.lift c = 𝟙 c.pt :=
(t.uniq _ _ fun _ => id_comp _).symm
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.lift_self CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.lift_self
-- Repackaging the definition in terms of cone morphisms.
@[simps]
def liftConeMorphism {t : Cone F} (h : IsLimit t) (s : Cone F) : s ⟶ t where hom := h.lift s
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.lift_cone_morphism CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.liftConeMorphism
theorem uniq_cone_morphism {s t : Cone F} (h : IsLimit t) {f f' : s ⟶ t} : f = f' :=
have : ∀ {g : s ⟶ t}, g = h.liftConeMorphism s := by
intro g; apply ConeMorphism.ext; exact h.uniq _ _ g.w
this.trans this.symm
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.uniq_cone_morphism CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.uniq_cone_morphism
theorem existsUnique {t : Cone F} (h : IsLimit t) (s : Cone F) :
∃! l : s.pt ⟶ t.pt, ∀ j, l ≫ t.π.app j = s.π.app j :=
⟨h.lift s, h.fac s, h.uniq s⟩
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.exists_unique CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.existsUnique
def ofExistsUnique {t : Cone F}
(ht : ∀ s : Cone F, ∃! l : s.pt ⟶ t.pt, ∀ j, l ≫ t.π.app j = s.π.app j) : IsLimit t := by
choose s hs hs' using ht
exact ⟨s, hs, hs'⟩
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.of_exists_unique CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.ofExistsUnique
@[simps]
def mkConeMorphism {t : Cone F} (lift : ∀ s : Cone F, s ⟶ t)
(uniq : ∀ (s : Cone F) (m : s ⟶ t), m = lift s) : IsLimit t where
lift s := (lift s).hom
uniq s m w :=
have : ConeMorphism.mk m w = lift s := by apply uniq
congrArg ConeMorphism.hom this
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.mk_cone_morphism CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.mkConeMorphism
@[simps]
def uniqueUpToIso {s t : Cone F} (P : IsLimit s) (Q : IsLimit t) : s ≅ t where
hom := Q.liftConeMorphism s
inv := P.liftConeMorphism t
hom_inv_id := P.uniq_cone_morphism
inv_hom_id := Q.uniq_cone_morphism
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.unique_up_to_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.uniqueUpToIso
theorem hom_isIso {s t : Cone F} (P : IsLimit s) (Q : IsLimit t) (f : s ⟶ t) : IsIso f :=
⟨⟨P.liftConeMorphism t, ⟨P.uniq_cone_morphism, Q.uniq_cone_morphism⟩⟩⟩
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.hom_is_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.hom_isIso
def conePointUniqueUpToIso {s t : Cone F} (P : IsLimit s) (Q : IsLimit t) : s.pt ≅ t.pt :=
(Cones.forget F).mapIso (uniqueUpToIso P Q)
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem conePointUniqueUpToIso_hom_comp {s t : Cone F} (P : IsLimit s) (Q : IsLimit t) (j : J) :
(conePointUniqueUpToIso P Q).hom ≫ t.π.app j = s.π.app j :=
(uniqueUpToIso P Q).hom.w _
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso_hom_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_hom_comp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp {s t : Cone F} (P : IsLimit s) (Q : IsLimit t) (j : J) :
(conePointUniqueUpToIso P Q).inv ≫ s.π.app j = t.π.app j :=
(uniqueUpToIso P Q).inv.w _
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso_inv_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_comp_conePointUniqueUpToIso_hom {r s t : Cone F} (P : IsLimit s) (Q : IsLimit t) :
P.lift r ≫ (conePointUniqueUpToIso P Q).hom = Q.lift r :=
Q.uniq _ _ (by simp)
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.lift_comp_cone_point_unique_up_to_iso_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.lift_comp_conePointUniqueUpToIso_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_comp_conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv {r s t : Cone F} (P : IsLimit s) (Q : IsLimit t) :
Q.lift r ≫ (conePointUniqueUpToIso P Q).inv = P.lift r :=
P.uniq _ _ (by simp)
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.lift_comp_cone_point_unique_up_to_iso_inv CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.lift_comp_conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv
def ofIsoLimit {r t : Cone F} (P : IsLimit r) (i : r ≅ t) : IsLimit t :=
IsLimit.mkConeMorphism (fun s => P.liftConeMorphism s ≫ i.hom) fun s m => by
rw [← i.comp_inv_eq]; apply P.uniq_cone_morphism
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.of_iso_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.ofIsoLimit
@[simp]
theorem ofIsoLimit_lift {r t : Cone F} (P : IsLimit r) (i : r ≅ t) (s) :
(P.ofIsoLimit i).lift s = P.lift s ≫ i.hom.hom :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.of_iso_limit_lift CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.ofIsoLimit_lift
def equivIsoLimit {r t : Cone F} (i : r ≅ t) : IsLimit r ≃ IsLimit t where
toFun h := h.ofIsoLimit i
invFun h := h.ofIsoLimit i.symm
left_inv := by aesop_cat
right_inv := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.equiv_iso_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.equivIsoLimit
@[simp]
theorem equivIsoLimit_apply {r t : Cone F} (i : r ≅ t) (P : IsLimit r) :
equivIsoLimit i P = P.ofIsoLimit i :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.equiv_iso_limit_apply CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.equivIsoLimit_apply
@[simp]
theorem equivIsoLimit_symm_apply {r t : Cone F} (i : r ≅ t) (P : IsLimit t) :
(equivIsoLimit i).symm P = P.ofIsoLimit i.symm :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.equiv_iso_limit_symm_apply CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.equivIsoLimit_symm_apply
def ofPointIso {r t : Cone F} (P : IsLimit r) [i : IsIso (P.lift t)] : IsLimit t :=
ofIsoLimit P (by
haveI : IsIso (P.liftConeMorphism t).hom := i
haveI : IsIso (P.liftConeMorphism t) := Cones.cone_iso_of_hom_iso _
symm
apply asIso (P.liftConeMorphism t))
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.of_point_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.ofPointIso
variable {t : Cone F}
theorem hom_lift (h : IsLimit t) {W : C} (m : W ⟶ t.pt) :
m = h.lift { pt := W, π := { app := fun b => m ≫ t.π.app b } } :=
h.uniq { pt := W, π := { app := fun b => m ≫ t.π.app b } } m fun b => rfl
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.hom_lift CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.hom_lift
theorem hom_ext (h : IsLimit t) {W : C} {f f' : W ⟶ t.pt}
(w : ∀ j, f ≫ t.π.app j = f' ≫ t.π.app j) :
f = f' := by
rw [h.hom_lift f, h.hom_lift f']; congr; exact funext w
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.hom_ext
def ofRightAdjoint {D : Type u₄} [Category.{v₄} D] {G : K ⥤ D} {left : Cone F ⥤ Cone G}
{right : Cone G ⥤ Cone F}
(adj : left ⊣ right) {c : Cone G} (t : IsLimit c) : IsLimit (right.obj c) :=
mkConeMorphism (fun s => adj.homEquiv s c (t.liftConeMorphism _))
fun _ _ => (Adjunction.eq_homEquiv_apply _ _ _).2 t.uniq_cone_morphism
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.of_right_adjoint CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.ofRightAdjoint
def ofConeEquiv {D : Type u₄} [Category.{v₄} D] {G : K ⥤ D} (h : Cone G ≌ Cone F) {c : Cone G} :
IsLimit (h.functor.obj c) ≃ IsLimit c where
toFun P := ofIsoLimit (ofRightAdjoint h.toAdjunction P) (h.unitIso.symm.app c)
invFun := ofRightAdjoint h.symm.toAdjunction
left_inv := by aesop_cat
right_inv := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.of_cone_equiv CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.ofConeEquiv
@[simp]
theorem ofConeEquiv_apply_desc {D : Type u₄} [Category.{v₄} D] {G : K ⥤ D} (h : Cone G ≌ Cone F)
{c : Cone G} (P : IsLimit (h.functor.obj c)) (s) :
(ofConeEquiv h P).lift s =
((h.unitIso.hom.app s).hom ≫ (h.inverse.map (P.liftConeMorphism (h.functor.obj s))).hom) ≫
(h.unitIso.inv.app c).hom :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.of_cone_equiv_apply_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.ofConeEquiv_apply_desc
@[simp]
theorem ofConeEquiv_symm_apply_desc {D : Type u₄} [Category.{v₄} D] {G : K ⥤ D}
(h : Cone G ≌ Cone F) {c : Cone G} (P : IsLimit c) (s) :
((ofConeEquiv h).symm P).lift s =
(h.counitIso.inv.app s).hom ≫ (h.functor.map (P.liftConeMorphism (h.inverse.obj s))).hom :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.of_cone_equiv_symm_apply_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.ofConeEquiv_symm_apply_desc
def postcomposeHomEquiv {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ≅ G) (c : Cone F) :
IsLimit ((Cones.postcompose α.hom).obj c) ≃ IsLimit c :=
ofConeEquiv (Cones.postcomposeEquivalence α)
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.postcompose_hom_equiv CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv
def postcomposeInvEquiv {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ≅ G) (c : Cone G) :
IsLimit ((Cones.postcompose α.inv).obj c) ≃ IsLimit c :=
postcomposeHomEquiv α.symm c
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.postcompose_inv_equiv CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.postcomposeInvEquiv
def equivOfNatIsoOfIso {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ≅ G) (c : Cone F) (d : Cone G)
(w : (Cones.postcompose α.hom).obj c ≅ d) : IsLimit c ≃ IsLimit d :=
(postcomposeHomEquiv α _).symm.trans (equivIsoLimit w)
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.equiv_of_nat_iso_of_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.equivOfNatIsoOfIso
@[simps]
def conePointsIsoOfNatIso {F G : J ⥤ C} {s : Cone F} {t : Cone G} (P : IsLimit s) (Q : IsLimit t)
(w : F ≅ G) : s.pt ≅ t.pt where
hom := Q.map s w.hom
inv := P.map t w.inv
hom_inv_id := P.hom_ext (by aesop_cat)
inv_hom_id := Q.hom_ext (by aesop_cat)
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.cone_points_iso_of_nat_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfNatIso
@[reassoc]
theorem conePointsIsoOfNatIso_hom_comp {F G : J ⥤ C} {s : Cone F} {t : Cone G} (P : IsLimit s)
(Q : IsLimit t) (w : F ≅ G) (j : J) :
(conePointsIsoOfNatIso P Q w).hom ≫ t.π.app j = s.π.app j ≫ w.hom.app j := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.cone_points_iso_of_nat_iso_hom_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfNatIso_hom_comp
@[reassoc]
theorem conePointsIsoOfNatIso_inv_comp {F G : J ⥤ C} {s : Cone F} {t : Cone G} (P : IsLimit s)
(Q : IsLimit t) (w : F ≅ G) (j : J) :
(conePointsIsoOfNatIso P Q w).inv ≫ s.π.app j = t.π.app j ≫ w.inv.app j := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.cone_points_iso_of_nat_iso_inv_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfNatIso_inv_comp
@[reassoc]
theorem lift_comp_conePointsIsoOfNatIso_hom {F G : J ⥤ C} {r s : Cone F} {t : Cone G}
(P : IsLimit s) (Q : IsLimit t) (w : F ≅ G) :
P.lift r ≫ (conePointsIsoOfNatIso P Q w).hom = Q.map r w.hom :=
Q.hom_ext (by simp)
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.lift_comp_cone_points_iso_of_nat_iso_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.lift_comp_conePointsIsoOfNatIso_hom
@[reassoc]
theorem lift_comp_conePointsIsoOfNatIso_inv {F G : J ⥤ C} {r s : Cone G} {t : Cone F}
(P : IsLimit t) (Q : IsLimit s) (w : F ≅ G) :
Q.lift r ≫ (conePointsIsoOfNatIso P Q w).inv = P.map r w.inv :=
P.hom_ext (by simp)
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.lift_comp_cone_points_iso_of_nat_iso_inv CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.lift_comp_conePointsIsoOfNatIso_inv
def homIso (h : IsLimit t) (W : C) : ULift.{u₁} (W ⟶ t.pt : Type v₃) ≅ (const J).obj W ⟶ F where
hom f := (t.extend f.down).π
inv π := ⟨h.lift { pt := W, π }⟩
hom_inv_id := by
funext f; apply ULift.ext
apply h.hom_ext; intro j; simp
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.hom_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.homIso
@[simp]
theorem homIso_hom (h : IsLimit t) {W : C} (f : ULift.{u₁} (W ⟶ t.pt)) :
(IsLimit.homIso h W).hom f = (t.extend f.down).π :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.hom_iso_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.homIso_hom
def natIso (h : IsLimit t) : yoneda.obj t.pt ⋙ uliftFunctor.{u₁} ≅ F.cones :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun W => IsLimit.homIso h (unop W)
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.nat_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.natIso
def homIso' (h : IsLimit t) (W : C) :
ULift.{u₁} (W ⟶ t.pt : Type v₃) ≅
{ p : ∀ j, W ⟶ F.obj j // ∀ {j j'} (f : j ⟶ j'), p j ≫ F.map f = p j' } :=
h.homIso W ≪≫
{ hom := fun π =>
⟨fun j => π.app j, fun f => by convert ← (π.naturality f).symm; apply id_comp⟩
inv := fun p =>
{ app := fun j => p.1 j
naturality := fun j j' f => by dsimp; rw [id_comp]; exact (p.2 f).symm } }
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.hom_iso' CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.homIso'
def ofFaithful {t : Cone F} {D : Type u₄} [Category.{v₄} D] (G : C ⥤ D) [G.Faithful]
(ht : IsLimit (mapCone G t)) (lift : ∀ s : Cone F, s.pt ⟶ t.pt)
(h : ∀ s, G.map (lift s) = ht.lift (mapCone G s)) : IsLimit t :=
{ lift
fac := fun s j => by apply G.map_injective; rw [G.map_comp, h]; apply ht.fac
uniq := fun s m w => by
apply G.map_injective; rw [h]
refine ht.uniq (mapCone G s) _ fun j => ?_
convert ← congrArg (fun f => G.map f) (w j)
apply G.map_comp }
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.of_faithful CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.ofFaithful
def mapConeEquiv {D : Type u₄} [Category.{v₄} D] {K : J ⥤ C} {F G : C ⥤ D} (h : F ≅ G) {c : Cone K}
(t : IsLimit (mapCone F c)) : IsLimit (mapCone G c) := by
apply postcomposeInvEquiv (isoWhiskerLeft K h : _) (mapCone G c) _
apply t.ofIsoLimit (postcomposeWhiskerLeftMapCone h.symm c).symm
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.map_cone_equiv CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.mapConeEquiv
def isoUniqueConeMorphism {t : Cone F} : IsLimit t ≅ ∀ s, Unique (s ⟶ t) where
hom h s :=
{ default := h.liftConeMorphism s
uniq := fun _ => h.uniq_cone_morphism }
inv h :=
{ lift := fun s => (h s).default.hom
uniq := fun s f w => congrArg ConeMorphism.hom ((h s).uniq ⟨f, w⟩) }
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.iso_unique_cone_morphism CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.isoUniqueConeMorphism
namespace OfNatIso
variable {X : C} (h : yoneda.obj X ⋙ uliftFunctor.{u₁} ≅ F.cones)
def coneOfHom {Y : C} (f : Y ⟶ X) : Cone F where
pt := Y
π := h.hom.app (op Y) ⟨f⟩
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.of_nat_iso.cone_of_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.OfNatIso.coneOfHom
def homOfCone (s : Cone F) : s.pt ⟶ X :=
(h.inv.app (op s.pt) s.π).down
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.of_nat_iso.hom_of_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.OfNatIso.homOfCone
@[simp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/IsLimit.lean | 492 | 497 | theorem coneOfHom_homOfCone (s : Cone F) : coneOfHom h (homOfCone h s) = s := by |
dsimp [coneOfHom, homOfCone]
match s with
| .mk s_pt s_π =>
congr; dsimp
convert congrFun (congrFun (congrArg NatTrans.app h.inv_hom_id) (op s_pt)) s_π using 1
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Actions
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.Algebra
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.LinearIndependent
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Subring.Units
#align_import linear_algebra.ray from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0f6670b8af2dff699de1c0b4b49039b31bc13c46"
noncomputable section
section StrictOrderedCommSemiring
variable (R : Type*) [StrictOrderedCommSemiring R]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable {N : Type*} [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
variable (ι : Type*) [DecidableEq ι]
def SameRay (v₁ v₂ : M) : Prop :=
v₁ = 0 ∨ v₂ = 0 ∨ ∃ r₁ r₂ : R, 0 < r₁ ∧ 0 < r₂ ∧ r₁ • v₁ = r₂ • v₂
#align same_ray SameRay
variable {R}
namespace SameRay
variable {x y z : M}
@[simp]
theorem zero_left (y : M) : SameRay R 0 y :=
Or.inl rfl
#align same_ray.zero_left SameRay.zero_left
@[simp]
theorem zero_right (x : M) : SameRay R x 0 :=
Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl
#align same_ray.zero_right SameRay.zero_right
@[nontriviality]
theorem of_subsingleton [Subsingleton M] (x y : M) : SameRay R x y := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim x 0]
exact zero_left _
#align same_ray.of_subsingleton SameRay.of_subsingleton
@[nontriviality]
theorem of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton R] (x y : M) : SameRay R x y :=
haveI := Module.subsingleton R M
of_subsingleton x y
#align same_ray.of_subsingleton' SameRay.of_subsingleton'
@[refl]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Ray.lean | 74 | 76 | theorem refl (x : M) : SameRay R x x := by |
nontriviality R
exact Or.inr (Or.inr <| ⟨1, 1, zero_lt_one, zero_lt_one, rfl⟩)
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.ExpDecay
import Mathlib.Analysis.MellinTransform
#align_import analysis.special_functions.gamma.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"cca40788df1b8755d5baf17ab2f27dacc2e17acb"
noncomputable section
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
open Filter intervalIntegral Set Real MeasureTheory Asymptotics
open scoped Nat Topology ComplexConjugate
namespace Real
theorem Gamma_integrand_isLittleO (s : ℝ) :
(fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ s) =o[atTop] fun x : ℝ => exp (-(1 / 2) * x) := by
refine isLittleO_of_tendsto (fun x hx => ?_) ?_
· exfalso; exact (exp_pos (-(1 / 2) * x)).ne' hx
have : (fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ s / exp (-(1 / 2) * x)) =
(fun x : ℝ => exp (1 / 2 * x) / x ^ s)⁻¹ := by
ext1 x
field_simp [exp_ne_zero, exp_neg, ← Real.exp_add]
left
ring
rw [this]
exact (tendsto_exp_mul_div_rpow_atTop s (1 / 2) one_half_pos).inv_tendsto_atTop
#align real.Gamma_integrand_is_o Real.Gamma_integrand_isLittleO
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gamma/Basic.lean | 71 | 82 | theorem GammaIntegral_convergent {s : ℝ} (h : 0 < s) :
IntegrableOn (fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)) (Ioi 0) := by |
rw [← Ioc_union_Ioi_eq_Ioi (@zero_le_one ℝ _ _ _ _), integrableOn_union]
constructor
· rw [← integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioc]
refine IntegrableOn.continuousOn_mul continuousOn_id.neg.rexp ?_ isCompact_Icc
refine (intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Icc_of_le zero_le_one).mp ?_
exact intervalIntegrable_rpow' (by linarith)
· refine integrable_of_isBigO_exp_neg one_half_pos ?_ (Gamma_integrand_isLittleO _).isBigO
refine continuousOn_id.neg.rexp.mul (continuousOn_id.rpow_const ?_)
intro x hx
exact Or.inl ((zero_lt_one : (0 : ℝ) < 1).trans_le hx).ne'
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Covering.BesicovitchVectorSpace
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.EqHaar
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Pointwise
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.Polish
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.InverseFunctionTheorem.ApproximatesLinearOn
#align_import measure_theory.function.jacobian from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b84aee748341da06a6d78491367e2c0e9f15e8a5"
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Metric Filter Set FiniteDimensional Asymptotics
TopologicalSpace
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology Pointwise
variable {E F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] {s : Set E} {f : E → E} {f' : E → E →L[ℝ] E}
theorem exists_closed_cover_approximatesLinearOn_of_hasFDerivWithinAt [SecondCountableTopology F]
(f : E → F) (s : Set E) (f' : E → E →L[ℝ] F) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ s, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x)
(r : (E →L[ℝ] F) → ℝ≥0) (rpos : ∀ A, r A ≠ 0) :
∃ (t : ℕ → Set E) (A : ℕ → E →L[ℝ] F),
(∀ n, IsClosed (t n)) ∧
(s ⊆ ⋃ n, t n) ∧
(∀ n, ApproximatesLinearOn f (A n) (s ∩ t n) (r (A n))) ∧
(s.Nonempty → ∀ n, ∃ y ∈ s, A n = f' y) := by
-- exclude the trivial case where `s` is empty
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | hs)
· refine ⟨fun _ => ∅, fun _ => 0, ?_, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ <;> simp
-- we will use countably many linear maps. Select these from all the derivatives since the
-- space of linear maps is second-countable
obtain ⟨T, T_count, hT⟩ :
∃ T : Set s,
T.Countable ∧ ⋃ x ∈ T, ball (f' (x : E)) (r (f' x)) = ⋃ x : s, ball (f' x) (r (f' x)) :=
TopologicalSpace.isOpen_iUnion_countable _ fun x => isOpen_ball
-- fix a sequence `u` of positive reals tending to zero.
obtain ⟨u, _, u_pos, u_lim⟩ :
∃ u : ℕ → ℝ, StrictAnti u ∧ (∀ n : ℕ, 0 < u n) ∧ Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 0) :=
exists_seq_strictAnti_tendsto (0 : ℝ)
-- `M n z` is the set of points `x` such that `f y - f x` is close to `f' z (y - x)` for `y`
-- in the ball of radius `u n` around `x`.
let M : ℕ → T → Set E := fun n z =>
{x | x ∈ s ∧ ∀ y ∈ s ∩ ball x (u n), ‖f y - f x - f' z (y - x)‖ ≤ r (f' z) * ‖y - x‖}
-- As `f` is differentiable everywhere on `s`, the sets `M n z` cover `s` by design.
have s_subset : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ (n : ℕ) (z : T), x ∈ M n z := by
intro x xs
obtain ⟨z, zT, hz⟩ : ∃ z ∈ T, f' x ∈ ball (f' (z : E)) (r (f' z)) := by
have : f' x ∈ ⋃ z ∈ T, ball (f' (z : E)) (r (f' z)) := by
rw [hT]
refine mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, xs⟩, ?_⟩
simpa only [mem_ball, Subtype.coe_mk, dist_self] using (rpos (f' x)).bot_lt
rwa [mem_iUnion₂, bex_def] at this
obtain ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩ : ∃ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε ∧ ‖f' x - f' z‖ + ε ≤ r (f' z) := by
refine ⟨r (f' z) - ‖f' x - f' z‖, ?_, le_of_eq (by abel)⟩
simpa only [sub_pos] using mem_ball_iff_norm.mp hz
obtain ⟨δ, δpos, hδ⟩ :
∃ (δ : ℝ), 0 < δ ∧ ball x δ ∩ s ⊆ {y | ‖f y - f x - (f' x) (y - x)‖ ≤ ε * ‖y - x‖} :=
Metric.mem_nhdsWithin_iff.1 ((hf' x xs).isLittleO.def εpos)
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, u n < δ := ((tendsto_order.1 u_lim).2 _ δpos).exists
refine ⟨n, ⟨z, zT⟩, ⟨xs, ?_⟩⟩
intro y hy
calc
‖f y - f x - (f' z) (y - x)‖ = ‖f y - f x - (f' x) (y - x) + (f' x - f' z) (y - x)‖ := by
congr 1
simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.coe_sub', map_sub, Pi.sub_apply]
abel
_ ≤ ‖f y - f x - (f' x) (y - x)‖ + ‖(f' x - f' z) (y - x)‖ := norm_add_le _ _
_ ≤ ε * ‖y - x‖ + ‖f' x - f' z‖ * ‖y - x‖ := by
refine add_le_add (hδ ?_) (ContinuousLinearMap.le_opNorm _ _)
rw [inter_comm]
exact inter_subset_inter_right _ (ball_subset_ball hn.le) hy
_ ≤ r (f' z) * ‖y - x‖ := by
rw [← add_mul, add_comm]
gcongr
-- the sets `M n z` are relatively closed in `s`, as all the conditions defining it are clearly
-- closed
have closure_M_subset : ∀ n z, s ∩ closure (M n z) ⊆ M n z := by
rintro n z x ⟨xs, hx⟩
refine ⟨xs, fun y hy => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨a, aM, a_lim⟩ : ∃ a : ℕ → E, (∀ k, a k ∈ M n z) ∧ Tendsto a atTop (𝓝 x) :=
mem_closure_iff_seq_limit.1 hx
have L1 :
Tendsto (fun k : ℕ => ‖f y - f (a k) - (f' z) (y - a k)‖) atTop
(𝓝 ‖f y - f x - (f' z) (y - x)‖) := by
apply Tendsto.norm
have L : Tendsto (fun k => f (a k)) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := by
apply (hf' x xs).continuousWithinAt.tendsto.comp
apply tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within _ a_lim
exact eventually_of_forall fun k => (aM k).1
apply Tendsto.sub (tendsto_const_nhds.sub L)
exact ((f' z).continuous.tendsto _).comp (tendsto_const_nhds.sub a_lim)
have L2 : Tendsto (fun k : ℕ => (r (f' z) : ℝ) * ‖y - a k‖) atTop (𝓝 (r (f' z) * ‖y - x‖)) :=
(tendsto_const_nhds.sub a_lim).norm.const_mul _
have I : ∀ᶠ k in atTop, ‖f y - f (a k) - (f' z) (y - a k)‖ ≤ r (f' z) * ‖y - a k‖ := by
have L : Tendsto (fun k => dist y (a k)) atTop (𝓝 (dist y x)) :=
tendsto_const_nhds.dist a_lim
filter_upwards [(tendsto_order.1 L).2 _ hy.2]
intro k hk
exact (aM k).2 y ⟨hy.1, hk⟩
exact le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto L1 L2 I
-- choose a dense sequence `d p`
rcases TopologicalSpace.exists_dense_seq E with ⟨d, hd⟩
-- split `M n z` into subsets `K n z p` of small diameters by intersecting with the ball
-- `closedBall (d p) (u n / 3)`.
let K : ℕ → T → ℕ → Set E := fun n z p => closure (M n z) ∩ closedBall (d p) (u n / 3)
-- on the sets `K n z p`, the map `f` is well approximated by `f' z` by design.
have K_approx : ∀ (n) (z : T) (p), ApproximatesLinearOn f (f' z) (s ∩ K n z p) (r (f' z)) := by
intro n z p x hx y hy
have yM : y ∈ M n z := closure_M_subset _ _ ⟨hy.1, hy.2.1⟩
refine yM.2 _ ⟨hx.1, ?_⟩
calc
dist x y ≤ dist x (d p) + dist y (d p) := dist_triangle_right _ _ _
_ ≤ u n / 3 + u n / 3 := add_le_add hx.2.2 hy.2.2
_ < u n := by linarith [u_pos n]
-- the sets `K n z p` are also closed, again by design.
have K_closed : ∀ (n) (z : T) (p), IsClosed (K n z p) := fun n z p =>
isClosed_closure.inter isClosed_ball
-- reindex the sets `K n z p`, to let them only depend on an integer parameter `q`.
obtain ⟨F, hF⟩ : ∃ F : ℕ → ℕ × T × ℕ, Function.Surjective F := by
haveI : Encodable T := T_count.toEncodable
have : Nonempty T := by
rcases hs with ⟨x, xs⟩
rcases s_subset x xs with ⟨n, z, _⟩
exact ⟨z⟩
inhabit ↥T
exact ⟨_, Encodable.surjective_decode_iget (ℕ × T × ℕ)⟩
-- these sets `t q = K n z p` will do
refine
⟨fun q => K (F q).1 (F q).2.1 (F q).2.2, fun q => f' (F q).2.1, fun n => K_closed _ _ _,
fun x xs => ?_, fun q => K_approx _ _ _, fun _ q => ⟨(F q).2.1, (F q).2.1.1.2, rfl⟩⟩
-- the only fact that needs further checking is that they cover `s`.
-- we already know that any point `x ∈ s` belongs to a set `M n z`.
obtain ⟨n, z, hnz⟩ : ∃ (n : ℕ) (z : T), x ∈ M n z := s_subset x xs
-- by density, it also belongs to a ball `closedBall (d p) (u n / 3)`.
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ : ∃ p : ℕ, x ∈ closedBall (d p) (u n / 3) := by
have : Set.Nonempty (ball x (u n / 3)) := by simp only [nonempty_ball]; linarith [u_pos n]
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ : ∃ p : ℕ, d p ∈ ball x (u n / 3) := hd.exists_mem_open isOpen_ball this
exact ⟨p, (mem_ball'.1 hp).le⟩
-- choose `q` for which `t q = K n z p`.
obtain ⟨q, hq⟩ : ∃ q, F q = (n, z, p) := hF _
-- then `x` belongs to `t q`.
apply mem_iUnion.2 ⟨q, _⟩
simp (config := { zeta := false }) only [K, hq, mem_inter_iff, hp, and_true]
exact subset_closure hnz
#align exists_closed_cover_approximates_linear_on_of_has_fderiv_within_at exists_closed_cover_approximatesLinearOn_of_hasFDerivWithinAt
variable [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ]
theorem exists_partition_approximatesLinearOn_of_hasFDerivWithinAt [SecondCountableTopology F]
(f : E → F) (s : Set E) (f' : E → E →L[ℝ] F) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ s, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x)
(r : (E →L[ℝ] F) → ℝ≥0) (rpos : ∀ A, r A ≠ 0) :
∃ (t : ℕ → Set E) (A : ℕ → E →L[ℝ] F),
Pairwise (Disjoint on t) ∧
(∀ n, MeasurableSet (t n)) ∧
(s ⊆ ⋃ n, t n) ∧
(∀ n, ApproximatesLinearOn f (A n) (s ∩ t n) (r (A n))) ∧
(s.Nonempty → ∀ n, ∃ y ∈ s, A n = f' y) := by
rcases exists_closed_cover_approximatesLinearOn_of_hasFDerivWithinAt f s f' hf' r rpos with
⟨t, A, t_closed, st, t_approx, ht⟩
refine
⟨disjointed t, A, disjoint_disjointed _,
MeasurableSet.disjointed fun n => (t_closed n).measurableSet, ?_, ?_, ht⟩
· rw [iUnion_disjointed]; exact st
· intro n; exact (t_approx n).mono_set (inter_subset_inter_right _ (disjointed_subset _ _))
#align exists_partition_approximates_linear_on_of_has_fderiv_within_at exists_partition_approximatesLinearOn_of_hasFDerivWithinAt
namespace MeasureTheory
theorem addHaar_image_le_mul_of_det_lt (A : E →L[ℝ] E) {m : ℝ≥0}
(hm : ENNReal.ofReal |A.det| < m) :
∀ᶠ δ in 𝓝[>] (0 : ℝ≥0),
∀ (s : Set E) (f : E → E), ApproximatesLinearOn f A s δ → μ (f '' s) ≤ m * μ s := by
apply nhdsWithin_le_nhds
let d := ENNReal.ofReal |A.det|
-- construct a small neighborhood of `A '' (closedBall 0 1)` with measure comparable to
-- the determinant of `A`.
obtain ⟨ε, hε, εpos⟩ :
∃ ε : ℝ, μ (closedBall 0 ε + A '' closedBall 0 1) < m * μ (closedBall 0 1) ∧ 0 < ε := by
have HC : IsCompact (A '' closedBall 0 1) :=
(ProperSpace.isCompact_closedBall _ _).image A.continuous
have L0 :
Tendsto (fun ε => μ (cthickening ε (A '' closedBall 0 1))) (𝓝[>] 0)
(𝓝 (μ (A '' closedBall 0 1))) := by
apply Tendsto.mono_left _ nhdsWithin_le_nhds
exact tendsto_measure_cthickening_of_isCompact HC
have L1 :
Tendsto (fun ε => μ (closedBall 0 ε + A '' closedBall 0 1)) (𝓝[>] 0)
(𝓝 (μ (A '' closedBall 0 1))) := by
apply L0.congr' _
filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin] with r hr
rw [← HC.add_closedBall_zero (le_of_lt hr), add_comm]
have L2 :
Tendsto (fun ε => μ (closedBall 0 ε + A '' closedBall 0 1)) (𝓝[>] 0)
(𝓝 (d * μ (closedBall 0 1))) := by
convert L1
exact (addHaar_image_continuousLinearMap _ _ _).symm
have I : d * μ (closedBall 0 1) < m * μ (closedBall 0 1) :=
(ENNReal.mul_lt_mul_right (measure_closedBall_pos μ _ zero_lt_one).ne'
measure_closedBall_lt_top.ne).2
hm
have H :
∀ᶠ b : ℝ in 𝓝[>] 0, μ (closedBall 0 b + A '' closedBall 0 1) < m * μ (closedBall 0 1) :=
(tendsto_order.1 L2).2 _ I
exact (H.and self_mem_nhdsWithin).exists
have : Iio (⟨ε, εpos.le⟩ : ℝ≥0) ∈ 𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0) := by apply Iio_mem_nhds; exact εpos
filter_upwards [this]
-- fix a function `f` which is close enough to `A`.
intro δ hδ s f hf
simp only [mem_Iio, ← NNReal.coe_lt_coe, NNReal.coe_mk] at hδ
-- This function expands the volume of any ball by at most `m`
have I : ∀ x r, x ∈ s → 0 ≤ r → μ (f '' (s ∩ closedBall x r)) ≤ m * μ (closedBall x r) := by
intro x r xs r0
have K : f '' (s ∩ closedBall x r) ⊆ A '' closedBall 0 r + closedBall (f x) (ε * r) := by
rintro y ⟨z, ⟨zs, zr⟩, rfl⟩
rw [mem_closedBall_iff_norm] at zr
apply Set.mem_add.2 ⟨A (z - x), _, f z - f x - A (z - x) + f x, _, _⟩
· apply mem_image_of_mem
simpa only [dist_eq_norm, mem_closedBall, mem_closedBall_zero_iff, sub_zero] using zr
· rw [mem_closedBall_iff_norm, add_sub_cancel_right]
calc
‖f z - f x - A (z - x)‖ ≤ δ * ‖z - x‖ := hf _ zs _ xs
_ ≤ ε * r := by gcongr
· simp only [map_sub, Pi.sub_apply]
abel
have :
A '' closedBall 0 r + closedBall (f x) (ε * r) =
{f x} + r • (A '' closedBall 0 1 + closedBall 0 ε) := by
rw [smul_add, ← add_assoc, add_comm {f x}, add_assoc, smul_closedBall _ _ εpos.le, smul_zero,
singleton_add_closedBall_zero, ← image_smul_set ℝ E E A, smul_closedBall _ _ zero_le_one,
smul_zero, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg r0, mul_one, mul_comm]
rw [this] at K
calc
μ (f '' (s ∩ closedBall x r)) ≤ μ ({f x} + r • (A '' closedBall 0 1 + closedBall 0 ε)) :=
measure_mono K
_ = ENNReal.ofReal (r ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (A '' closedBall 0 1 + closedBall 0 ε) := by
simp only [abs_of_nonneg r0, addHaar_smul, image_add_left, abs_pow, singleton_add,
measure_preimage_add]
_ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (r ^ finrank ℝ E) * (m * μ (closedBall 0 1)) := by
rw [add_comm]; gcongr
_ = m * μ (closedBall x r) := by simp only [addHaar_closedBall' μ _ r0]; ring
-- covering `s` by closed balls with total measure very close to `μ s`, one deduces that the
-- measure of `f '' s` is at most `m * (μ s + a)` for any positive `a`.
have J : ∀ᶠ a in 𝓝[>] (0 : ℝ≥0∞), μ (f '' s) ≤ m * (μ s + a) := by
filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin] with a ha
rw [mem_Ioi] at ha
obtain ⟨t, r, t_count, ts, rpos, st, μt⟩ :
∃ (t : Set E) (r : E → ℝ),
t.Countable ∧
t ⊆ s ∧
(∀ x : E, x ∈ t → 0 < r x) ∧
(s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x (r x)) ∧
(∑' x : ↥t, μ (closedBall (↑x) (r ↑x))) ≤ μ s + a :=
Besicovitch.exists_closedBall_covering_tsum_measure_le μ ha.ne' (fun _ => Ioi 0) s
fun x _ δ δpos => ⟨δ / 2, by simp [half_pos δpos, δpos]⟩
haveI : Encodable t := t_count.toEncodable
calc
μ (f '' s) ≤ μ (⋃ x : t, f '' (s ∩ closedBall x (r x))) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion] at st
apply measure_mono
rw [← image_iUnion, ← inter_iUnion]
exact image_subset _ (subset_inter (Subset.refl _) st)
_ ≤ ∑' x : t, μ (f '' (s ∩ closedBall x (r x))) := measure_iUnion_le _
_ ≤ ∑' x : t, m * μ (closedBall x (r x)) :=
(ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun x => I x (r x) (ts x.2) (rpos x x.2).le)
_ ≤ m * (μ s + a) := by rw [ENNReal.tsum_mul_left]; gcongr
-- taking the limit in `a`, one obtains the conclusion
have L : Tendsto (fun a => (m : ℝ≥0∞) * (μ s + a)) (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 (m * (μ s + 0))) := by
apply Tendsto.mono_left _ nhdsWithin_le_nhds
apply ENNReal.Tendsto.const_mul (tendsto_const_nhds.add tendsto_id)
simp only [ENNReal.coe_ne_top, Ne, or_true_iff, not_false_iff]
rw [add_zero] at L
exact ge_of_tendsto L J
#align measure_theory.add_haar_image_le_mul_of_det_lt MeasureTheory.addHaar_image_le_mul_of_det_lt
theorem mul_le_addHaar_image_of_lt_det (A : E →L[ℝ] E) {m : ℝ≥0}
(hm : (m : ℝ≥0∞) < ENNReal.ofReal |A.det|) :
∀ᶠ δ in 𝓝[>] (0 : ℝ≥0),
∀ (s : Set E) (f : E → E), ApproximatesLinearOn f A s δ → (m : ℝ≥0∞) * μ s ≤ μ (f '' s) := by
apply nhdsWithin_le_nhds
-- The assumption `hm` implies that `A` is invertible. If `f` is close enough to `A`, it is also
-- invertible. One can then pass to the inverses, and deduce the estimate from
-- `addHaar_image_le_mul_of_det_lt` applied to `f⁻¹` and `A⁻¹`.
-- exclude first the trivial case where `m = 0`.
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (zero_le m) with (rfl | mpos)
· filter_upwards
simp only [forall_const, zero_mul, imp_true_iff, zero_le, ENNReal.coe_zero]
have hA : A.det ≠ 0 := by
intro h; simp only [h, ENNReal.not_lt_zero, ENNReal.ofReal_zero, abs_zero] at hm
-- let `B` be the continuous linear equiv version of `A`.
let B := A.toContinuousLinearEquivOfDetNeZero hA
-- the determinant of `B.symm` is bounded by `m⁻¹`
have I : ENNReal.ofReal |(B.symm : E →L[ℝ] E).det| < (m⁻¹ : ℝ≥0) := by
simp only [ENNReal.ofReal, abs_inv, Real.toNNReal_inv, ContinuousLinearEquiv.det_coe_symm,
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_toContinuousLinearEquivOfDetNeZero, ENNReal.coe_lt_coe] at hm ⊢
exact NNReal.inv_lt_inv mpos.ne' hm
-- therefore, we may apply `addHaar_image_le_mul_of_det_lt` to `B.symm` and `m⁻¹`.
obtain ⟨δ₀, δ₀pos, hδ₀⟩ :
∃ δ : ℝ≥0,
0 < δ ∧
∀ (t : Set E) (g : E → E),
ApproximatesLinearOn g (B.symm : E →L[ℝ] E) t δ → μ (g '' t) ≤ ↑m⁻¹ * μ t := by
have :
∀ᶠ δ : ℝ≥0 in 𝓝[>] 0,
∀ (t : Set E) (g : E → E),
ApproximatesLinearOn g (B.symm : E →L[ℝ] E) t δ → μ (g '' t) ≤ ↑m⁻¹ * μ t :=
addHaar_image_le_mul_of_det_lt μ B.symm I
rcases (this.and self_mem_nhdsWithin).exists with ⟨δ₀, h, h'⟩
exact ⟨δ₀, h', h⟩
-- record smallness conditions for `δ` that will be needed to apply `hδ₀` below.
have L1 : ∀ᶠ δ in 𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0), Subsingleton E ∨ δ < ‖(B.symm : E →L[ℝ] E)‖₊⁻¹ := by
by_cases h : Subsingleton E
· simp only [h, true_or_iff, eventually_const]
simp only [h, false_or_iff]
apply Iio_mem_nhds
simpa only [h, false_or_iff, inv_pos] using B.subsingleton_or_nnnorm_symm_pos
have L2 :
∀ᶠ δ in 𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0), ‖(B.symm : E →L[ℝ] E)‖₊ * (‖(B.symm : E →L[ℝ] E)‖₊⁻¹ - δ)⁻¹ * δ < δ₀ := by
have :
Tendsto (fun δ => ‖(B.symm : E →L[ℝ] E)‖₊ * (‖(B.symm : E →L[ℝ] E)‖₊⁻¹ - δ)⁻¹ * δ) (𝓝 0)
(𝓝 (‖(B.symm : E →L[ℝ] E)‖₊ * (‖(B.symm : E →L[ℝ] E)‖₊⁻¹ - 0)⁻¹ * 0)) := by
rcases eq_or_ne ‖(B.symm : E →L[ℝ] E)‖₊ 0 with (H | H)
· simpa only [H, zero_mul] using tendsto_const_nhds
refine Tendsto.mul (tendsto_const_nhds.mul ?_) tendsto_id
refine (Tendsto.sub tendsto_const_nhds tendsto_id).inv₀ ?_
simpa only [tsub_zero, inv_eq_zero, Ne] using H
simp only [mul_zero] at this
exact (tendsto_order.1 this).2 δ₀ δ₀pos
-- let `δ` be small enough, and `f` approximated by `B` up to `δ`.
filter_upwards [L1, L2]
intro δ h1δ h2δ s f hf
have hf' : ApproximatesLinearOn f (B : E →L[ℝ] E) s δ := by convert hf
let F := hf'.toPartialEquiv h1δ
-- the condition to be checked can be reformulated in terms of the inverse maps
suffices H : μ (F.symm '' F.target) ≤ (m⁻¹ : ℝ≥0) * μ F.target by
change (m : ℝ≥0∞) * μ F.source ≤ μ F.target
rwa [← F.symm_image_target_eq_source, mul_comm, ← ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le, div_eq_mul_inv,
mul_comm, ← ENNReal.coe_inv mpos.ne']
· apply Or.inl
simpa only [ENNReal.coe_eq_zero, Ne] using mpos.ne'
· simp only [ENNReal.coe_ne_top, true_or_iff, Ne, not_false_iff]
-- as `f⁻¹` is well approximated by `B⁻¹`, the conclusion follows from `hδ₀`
-- and our choice of `δ`.
exact hδ₀ _ _ ((hf'.to_inv h1δ).mono_num h2δ.le)
#align measure_theory.mul_le_add_haar_image_of_lt_det MeasureTheory.mul_le_addHaar_image_of_lt_det
theorem _root_.ApproximatesLinearOn.norm_fderiv_sub_le {A : E →L[ℝ] E} {δ : ℝ≥0}
(hf : ApproximatesLinearOn f A s δ) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (f' : E → E →L[ℝ] E)
(hf' : ∀ x ∈ s, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x) : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, ‖f' x - A‖₊ ≤ δ := by
filter_upwards [Besicovitch.ae_tendsto_measure_inter_div μ s, ae_restrict_mem hs]
-- start from a Lebesgue density point `x`, belonging to `s`.
intro x hx xs
-- consider an arbitrary vector `z`.
apply ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_le_bound _ δ.2 fun z => ?_
-- to show that `‖(f' x - A) z‖ ≤ δ ‖z‖`, it suffices to do it up to some error that vanishes
-- asymptotically in terms of `ε > 0`.
suffices H : ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ‖(f' x - A) z‖ ≤ (δ + ε) * (‖z‖ + ε) + ‖f' x - A‖ * ε by
have :
Tendsto (fun ε : ℝ => ((δ : ℝ) + ε) * (‖z‖ + ε) + ‖f' x - A‖ * ε) (𝓝[>] 0)
(𝓝 ((δ + 0) * (‖z‖ + 0) + ‖f' x - A‖ * 0)) :=
Tendsto.mono_left (Continuous.tendsto (by continuity) 0) nhdsWithin_le_nhds
simp only [add_zero, mul_zero] at this
apply le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto tendsto_const_nhds this
filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin]
exact H
-- fix a positive `ε`.
intro ε εpos
-- for small enough `r`, the rescaled ball `r • closedBall z ε` intersects `s`, as `x` is a
-- density point
have B₁ : ∀ᶠ r in 𝓝[>] (0 : ℝ), (s ∩ ({x} + r • closedBall z ε)).Nonempty :=
eventually_nonempty_inter_smul_of_density_one μ s x hx _ measurableSet_closedBall
(measure_closedBall_pos μ z εpos).ne'
obtain ⟨ρ, ρpos, hρ⟩ :
∃ ρ > 0, ball x ρ ∩ s ⊆ {y : E | ‖f y - f x - (f' x) (y - x)‖ ≤ ε * ‖y - x‖} :=
mem_nhdsWithin_iff.1 ((hf' x xs).isLittleO.def εpos)
-- for small enough `r`, the rescaled ball `r • closedBall z ε` is included in the set where
-- `f y - f x` is well approximated by `f' x (y - x)`.
have B₂ : ∀ᶠ r in 𝓝[>] (0 : ℝ), {x} + r • closedBall z ε ⊆ ball x ρ := by
apply nhdsWithin_le_nhds
exact eventually_singleton_add_smul_subset isBounded_closedBall (ball_mem_nhds x ρpos)
-- fix a small positive `r` satisfying the above properties, as well as a corresponding `y`.
obtain ⟨r, ⟨y, ⟨ys, hy⟩⟩, rρ, rpos⟩ :
∃ r : ℝ,
(s ∩ ({x} + r • closedBall z ε)).Nonempty ∧ {x} + r • closedBall z ε ⊆ ball x ρ ∧ 0 < r :=
(B₁.and (B₂.and self_mem_nhdsWithin)).exists
-- write `y = x + r a` with `a ∈ closedBall z ε`.
obtain ⟨a, az, ya⟩ : ∃ a, a ∈ closedBall z ε ∧ y = x + r • a := by
simp only [mem_smul_set, image_add_left, mem_preimage, singleton_add] at hy
rcases hy with ⟨a, az, ha⟩
exact ⟨a, az, by simp only [ha, add_neg_cancel_left]⟩
have norm_a : ‖a‖ ≤ ‖z‖ + ε :=
calc
‖a‖ = ‖z + (a - z)‖ := by simp only [add_sub_cancel]
_ ≤ ‖z‖ + ‖a - z‖ := norm_add_le _ _
_ ≤ ‖z‖ + ε := add_le_add_left (mem_closedBall_iff_norm.1 az) _
-- use the approximation properties to control `(f' x - A) a`, and then `(f' x - A) z` as `z` is
-- close to `a`.
have I : r * ‖(f' x - A) a‖ ≤ r * (δ + ε) * (‖z‖ + ε) :=
calc
r * ‖(f' x - A) a‖ = ‖(f' x - A) (r • a)‖ := by
simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.map_smul, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg rpos.le]
_ = ‖f y - f x - A (y - x) - (f y - f x - (f' x) (y - x))‖ := by
congr 1
simp only [ya, add_sub_cancel_left, sub_sub_sub_cancel_left, ContinuousLinearMap.coe_sub',
eq_self_iff_true, sub_left_inj, Pi.sub_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.map_smul, smul_sub]
_ ≤ ‖f y - f x - A (y - x)‖ + ‖f y - f x - (f' x) (y - x)‖ := norm_sub_le _ _
_ ≤ δ * ‖y - x‖ + ε * ‖y - x‖ := (add_le_add (hf _ ys _ xs) (hρ ⟨rρ hy, ys⟩))
_ = r * (δ + ε) * ‖a‖ := by
simp only [ya, add_sub_cancel_left, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg rpos.le]
ring
_ ≤ r * (δ + ε) * (‖z‖ + ε) := by gcongr
calc
‖(f' x - A) z‖ = ‖(f' x - A) a + (f' x - A) (z - a)‖ := by
congr 1
simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.coe_sub', map_sub, Pi.sub_apply]
abel
_ ≤ ‖(f' x - A) a‖ + ‖(f' x - A) (z - a)‖ := norm_add_le _ _
_ ≤ (δ + ε) * (‖z‖ + ε) + ‖f' x - A‖ * ‖z - a‖ := by
apply add_le_add
· rw [mul_assoc] at I; exact (mul_le_mul_left rpos).1 I
· apply ContinuousLinearMap.le_opNorm
_ ≤ (δ + ε) * (‖z‖ + ε) + ‖f' x - A‖ * ε := by
rw [mem_closedBall_iff_norm'] at az
gcongr
#align approximates_linear_on.norm_fderiv_sub_le ApproximatesLinearOn.norm_fderiv_sub_le
theorem addHaar_image_eq_zero_of_differentiableOn_of_addHaar_eq_zero (hf : DifferentiableOn ℝ f s)
(hs : μ s = 0) : μ (f '' s) = 0 := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (zero_le _)
have :
∀ A : E →L[ℝ] E, ∃ δ : ℝ≥0, 0 < δ ∧
∀ (t : Set E), ApproximatesLinearOn f A t δ →
μ (f '' t) ≤ (Real.toNNReal |A.det| + 1 : ℝ≥0) * μ t := by
intro A
let m : ℝ≥0 := Real.toNNReal |A.det| + 1
have I : ENNReal.ofReal |A.det| < m := by
simp only [m, ENNReal.ofReal, lt_add_iff_pos_right, zero_lt_one, ENNReal.coe_lt_coe]
rcases ((addHaar_image_le_mul_of_det_lt μ A I).and self_mem_nhdsWithin).exists with ⟨δ, h, h'⟩
exact ⟨δ, h', fun t ht => h t f ht⟩
choose δ hδ using this
obtain ⟨t, A, _, _, t_cover, ht, -⟩ :
∃ (t : ℕ → Set E) (A : ℕ → E →L[ℝ] E),
Pairwise (Disjoint on t) ∧
(∀ n : ℕ, MeasurableSet (t n)) ∧
(s ⊆ ⋃ n : ℕ, t n) ∧
(∀ n : ℕ, ApproximatesLinearOn f (A n) (s ∩ t n) (δ (A n))) ∧
(s.Nonempty → ∀ n, ∃ y ∈ s, A n = fderivWithin ℝ f s y) :=
exists_partition_approximatesLinearOn_of_hasFDerivWithinAt f s (fderivWithin ℝ f s)
(fun x xs => (hf x xs).hasFDerivWithinAt) δ fun A => (hδ A).1.ne'
calc
μ (f '' s) ≤ μ (⋃ n, f '' (s ∩ t n)) := by
apply measure_mono
rw [← image_iUnion, ← inter_iUnion]
exact image_subset f (subset_inter Subset.rfl t_cover)
_ ≤ ∑' n, μ (f '' (s ∩ t n)) := measure_iUnion_le _
_ ≤ ∑' n, (Real.toNNReal |(A n).det| + 1 : ℝ≥0) * μ (s ∩ t n) := by
apply ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun n => ?_
apply (hδ (A n)).2
exact ht n
_ ≤ ∑' n, ((Real.toNNReal |(A n).det| + 1 : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞) * 0 := by
refine ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun n => mul_le_mul_left' ?_ _
exact le_trans (measure_mono inter_subset_left) (le_of_eq hs)
_ = 0 := by simp only [tsum_zero, mul_zero]
#align measure_theory.add_haar_image_eq_zero_of_differentiable_on_of_add_haar_eq_zero MeasureTheory.addHaar_image_eq_zero_of_differentiableOn_of_addHaar_eq_zero
theorem addHaar_image_eq_zero_of_det_fderivWithin_eq_zero_aux
(hf' : ∀ x ∈ s, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x) (R : ℝ) (hs : s ⊆ closedBall 0 R) (ε : ℝ≥0)
(εpos : 0 < ε) (h'f' : ∀ x ∈ s, (f' x).det = 0) : μ (f '' s) ≤ ε * μ (closedBall 0 R) := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | h's); · simp only [measure_empty, zero_le, image_empty]
have :
∀ A : E →L[ℝ] E, ∃ δ : ℝ≥0, 0 < δ ∧
∀ (t : Set E), ApproximatesLinearOn f A t δ →
μ (f '' t) ≤ (Real.toNNReal |A.det| + ε : ℝ≥0) * μ t := by
intro A
let m : ℝ≥0 := Real.toNNReal |A.det| + ε
have I : ENNReal.ofReal |A.det| < m := by
simp only [m, ENNReal.ofReal, lt_add_iff_pos_right, εpos, ENNReal.coe_lt_coe]
rcases ((addHaar_image_le_mul_of_det_lt μ A I).and self_mem_nhdsWithin).exists with ⟨δ, h, h'⟩
exact ⟨δ, h', fun t ht => h t f ht⟩
choose δ hδ using this
obtain ⟨t, A, t_disj, t_meas, t_cover, ht, Af'⟩ :
∃ (t : ℕ → Set E) (A : ℕ → E →L[ℝ] E),
Pairwise (Disjoint on t) ∧
(∀ n : ℕ, MeasurableSet (t n)) ∧
(s ⊆ ⋃ n : ℕ, t n) ∧
(∀ n : ℕ, ApproximatesLinearOn f (A n) (s ∩ t n) (δ (A n))) ∧
(s.Nonempty → ∀ n, ∃ y ∈ s, A n = f' y) :=
exists_partition_approximatesLinearOn_of_hasFDerivWithinAt f s f' hf' δ fun A => (hδ A).1.ne'
calc
μ (f '' s) ≤ μ (⋃ n, f '' (s ∩ t n)) := by
rw [← image_iUnion, ← inter_iUnion]
gcongr
exact subset_inter Subset.rfl t_cover
_ ≤ ∑' n, μ (f '' (s ∩ t n)) := measure_iUnion_le _
_ ≤ ∑' n, (Real.toNNReal |(A n).det| + ε : ℝ≥0) * μ (s ∩ t n) := by
gcongr
exact (hδ (A _)).2 _ (ht _)
_ = ∑' n, ε * μ (s ∩ t n) := by
congr with n
rcases Af' h's n with ⟨y, ys, hy⟩
simp only [hy, h'f' y ys, Real.toNNReal_zero, abs_zero, zero_add]
_ ≤ ε * ∑' n, μ (closedBall 0 R ∩ t n) := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_mul_left]
gcongr
_ = ε * μ (⋃ n, closedBall 0 R ∩ t n) := by
rw [measure_iUnion]
· exact pairwise_disjoint_mono t_disj fun n => inter_subset_right
· intro n
exact measurableSet_closedBall.inter (t_meas n)
_ ≤ ε * μ (closedBall 0 R) := by
rw [← inter_iUnion]
exact mul_le_mul_left' (measure_mono inter_subset_left) _
#align measure_theory.add_haar_image_eq_zero_of_det_fderiv_within_eq_zero_aux MeasureTheory.addHaar_image_eq_zero_of_det_fderivWithin_eq_zero_aux
theorem addHaar_image_eq_zero_of_det_fderivWithin_eq_zero
(hf' : ∀ x ∈ s, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x) (h'f' : ∀ x ∈ s, (f' x).det = 0) :
μ (f '' s) = 0 := by
suffices H : ∀ R, μ (f '' (s ∩ closedBall 0 R)) = 0 by
apply le_antisymm _ (zero_le _)
rw [← iUnion_inter_closedBall_nat s 0]
calc
μ (f '' ⋃ n : ℕ, s ∩ closedBall 0 n) ≤ ∑' n : ℕ, μ (f '' (s ∩ closedBall 0 n)) := by
rw [image_iUnion]; exact measure_iUnion_le _
_ ≤ 0 := by simp only [H, tsum_zero, nonpos_iff_eq_zero]
intro R
have A : ∀ (ε : ℝ≥0), 0 < ε → μ (f '' (s ∩ closedBall 0 R)) ≤ ε * μ (closedBall 0 R) :=
fun ε εpos =>
addHaar_image_eq_zero_of_det_fderivWithin_eq_zero_aux μ
(fun x hx => (hf' x hx.1).mono inter_subset_left) R inter_subset_right ε εpos
fun x hx => h'f' x hx.1
have B : Tendsto (fun ε : ℝ≥0 => (ε : ℝ≥0∞) * μ (closedBall 0 R)) (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 0) := by
have :
Tendsto (fun ε : ℝ≥0 => (ε : ℝ≥0∞) * μ (closedBall 0 R)) (𝓝 0)
(𝓝 (((0 : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞) * μ (closedBall 0 R))) :=
ENNReal.Tendsto.mul_const (ENNReal.tendsto_coe.2 tendsto_id)
(Or.inr measure_closedBall_lt_top.ne)
simp only [zero_mul, ENNReal.coe_zero] at this
exact Tendsto.mono_left this nhdsWithin_le_nhds
apply le_antisymm _ (zero_le _)
apply ge_of_tendsto B
filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin]
exact A
#align measure_theory.add_haar_image_eq_zero_of_det_fderiv_within_eq_zero MeasureTheory.addHaar_image_eq_zero_of_det_fderivWithin_eq_zero
theorem aemeasurable_fderivWithin (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hf' : ∀ x ∈ s, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x) : AEMeasurable f' (μ.restrict s) := by
-- fix a precision `ε`
refine aemeasurable_of_unif_approx fun ε εpos => ?_
let δ : ℝ≥0 := ⟨ε, le_of_lt εpos⟩
have δpos : 0 < δ := εpos
-- partition `s` into sets `s ∩ t n` on which `f` is approximated by linear maps `A n`.
obtain ⟨t, A, t_disj, t_meas, t_cover, ht, _⟩ :
∃ (t : ℕ → Set E) (A : ℕ → E →L[ℝ] E),
Pairwise (Disjoint on t) ∧
(∀ n : ℕ, MeasurableSet (t n)) ∧
(s ⊆ ⋃ n : ℕ, t n) ∧
(∀ n : ℕ, ApproximatesLinearOn f (A n) (s ∩ t n) δ) ∧
(s.Nonempty → ∀ n, ∃ y ∈ s, A n = f' y) :=
exists_partition_approximatesLinearOn_of_hasFDerivWithinAt f s f' hf' (fun _ => δ) fun _ =>
δpos.ne'
-- define a measurable function `g` which coincides with `A n` on `t n`.
obtain ⟨g, g_meas, hg⟩ :
∃ g : E → E →L[ℝ] E, Measurable g ∧ ∀ (n : ℕ) (x : E), x ∈ t n → g x = A n :=
exists_measurable_piecewise t t_meas (fun n _ => A n) (fun n => measurable_const) <|
t_disj.mono fun i j h => by simp only [h.inter_eq, eqOn_empty]
refine ⟨g, g_meas.aemeasurable, ?_⟩
-- reduce to checking that `f'` and `g` are close on almost all of `s ∩ t n`, for all `n`.
suffices H : ∀ᵐ x : E ∂sum fun n ↦ μ.restrict (s ∩ t n), dist (g x) (f' x) ≤ ε by
have : μ.restrict s ≤ sum fun n => μ.restrict (s ∩ t n) := by
have : s = ⋃ n, s ∩ t n := by
rw [← inter_iUnion]
exact Subset.antisymm (subset_inter Subset.rfl t_cover) inter_subset_left
conv_lhs => rw [this]
exact restrict_iUnion_le
exact ae_mono this H
-- fix such an `n`.
refine ae_sum_iff.2 fun n => ?_
-- on almost all `s ∩ t n`, `f' x` is close to `A n` thanks to
-- `ApproximatesLinearOn.norm_fderiv_sub_le`.
have E₁ : ∀ᵐ x : E ∂μ.restrict (s ∩ t n), ‖f' x - A n‖₊ ≤ δ :=
(ht n).norm_fderiv_sub_le μ (hs.inter (t_meas n)) f' fun x hx =>
(hf' x hx.1).mono inter_subset_left
-- moreover, `g x` is equal to `A n` there.
have E₂ : ∀ᵐ x : E ∂μ.restrict (s ∩ t n), g x = A n := by
suffices H : ∀ᵐ x : E ∂μ.restrict (t n), g x = A n from
ae_mono (restrict_mono inter_subset_right le_rfl) H
filter_upwards [ae_restrict_mem (t_meas n)]
exact hg n
-- putting these two properties together gives the conclusion.
filter_upwards [E₁, E₂] with x hx1 hx2
rw [← nndist_eq_nnnorm] at hx1
rw [hx2, dist_comm]
exact hx1
#align measure_theory.ae_measurable_fderiv_within MeasureTheory.aemeasurable_fderivWithin
theorem aemeasurable_ofReal_abs_det_fderivWithin (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hf' : ∀ x ∈ s, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x) :
AEMeasurable (fun x => ENNReal.ofReal |(f' x).det|) (μ.restrict s) := by
apply ENNReal.measurable_ofReal.comp_aemeasurable
refine continuous_abs.measurable.comp_aemeasurable ?_
refine ContinuousLinearMap.continuous_det.measurable.comp_aemeasurable ?_
exact aemeasurable_fderivWithin μ hs hf'
#align measure_theory.ae_measurable_of_real_abs_det_fderiv_within MeasureTheory.aemeasurable_ofReal_abs_det_fderivWithin
theorem aemeasurable_toNNReal_abs_det_fderivWithin (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hf' : ∀ x ∈ s, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x) :
AEMeasurable (fun x => |(f' x).det|.toNNReal) (μ.restrict s) := by
apply measurable_real_toNNReal.comp_aemeasurable
refine continuous_abs.measurable.comp_aemeasurable ?_
refine ContinuousLinearMap.continuous_det.measurable.comp_aemeasurable ?_
exact aemeasurable_fderivWithin μ hs hf'
#align measure_theory.ae_measurable_to_nnreal_abs_det_fderiv_within MeasureTheory.aemeasurable_toNNReal_abs_det_fderivWithin
theorem measurable_image_of_fderivWithin (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hf' : ∀ x ∈ s, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x) (hf : InjOn f s) : MeasurableSet (f '' s) :=
haveI : DifferentiableOn ℝ f s := fun x hx => (hf' x hx).differentiableWithinAt
hs.image_of_continuousOn_injOn (DifferentiableOn.continuousOn this) hf
#align measure_theory.measurable_image_of_fderiv_within MeasureTheory.measurable_image_of_fderivWithin
theorem measurableEmbedding_of_fderivWithin (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hf' : ∀ x ∈ s, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x) (hf : InjOn f s) :
MeasurableEmbedding (s.restrict f) :=
haveI : DifferentiableOn ℝ f s := fun x hx => (hf' x hx).differentiableWithinAt
this.continuousOn.measurableEmbedding hs hf
#align measure_theory.measurable_embedding_of_fderiv_within MeasureTheory.measurableEmbedding_of_fderivWithin
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/Jacobian.lean | 795 | 871 | theorem addHaar_image_le_lintegral_abs_det_fderiv_aux1 (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hf' : ∀ x ∈ s, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x) {ε : ℝ≥0} (εpos : 0 < ε) :
μ (f '' s) ≤ (∫⁻ x in s, ENNReal.ofReal |(f' x).det| ∂μ) + 2 * ε * μ s := by |
/- To bound `μ (f '' s)`, we cover `s` by sets where `f` is well-approximated by linear maps
`A n` (and where `f'` is almost everywhere close to `A n`), and then use that `f` expands the
measure of such a set by at most `(A n).det + ε`. -/
have :
∀ A : E →L[ℝ] E,
∃ δ : ℝ≥0,
0 < δ ∧
(∀ B : E →L[ℝ] E, ‖B - A‖ ≤ δ → |B.det - A.det| ≤ ε) ∧
∀ (t : Set E) (g : E → E), ApproximatesLinearOn g A t δ →
μ (g '' t) ≤ (ENNReal.ofReal |A.det| + ε) * μ t := by
intro A
let m : ℝ≥0 := Real.toNNReal |A.det| + ε
have I : ENNReal.ofReal |A.det| < m := by
simp only [m, ENNReal.ofReal, lt_add_iff_pos_right, εpos, ENNReal.coe_lt_coe]
rcases ((addHaar_image_le_mul_of_det_lt μ A I).and self_mem_nhdsWithin).exists with ⟨δ, h, δpos⟩
obtain ⟨δ', δ'pos, hδ'⟩ : ∃ (δ' : ℝ), 0 < δ' ∧ ∀ B, dist B A < δ' → dist B.det A.det < ↑ε :=
continuousAt_iff.1 ContinuousLinearMap.continuous_det.continuousAt ε εpos
let δ'' : ℝ≥0 := ⟨δ' / 2, (half_pos δ'pos).le⟩
refine ⟨min δ δ'', lt_min δpos (half_pos δ'pos), ?_, ?_⟩
· intro B hB
rw [← Real.dist_eq]
apply (hδ' B _).le
rw [dist_eq_norm]
calc
‖B - A‖ ≤ (min δ δ'' : ℝ≥0) := hB
_ ≤ δ'' := by simp only [le_refl, NNReal.coe_min, min_le_iff, or_true_iff]
_ < δ' := half_lt_self δ'pos
· intro t g htg
exact h t g (htg.mono_num (min_le_left _ _))
choose δ hδ using this
obtain ⟨t, A, t_disj, t_meas, t_cover, ht, -⟩ :
∃ (t : ℕ → Set E) (A : ℕ → E →L[ℝ] E),
Pairwise (Disjoint on t) ∧
(∀ n : ℕ, MeasurableSet (t n)) ∧
(s ⊆ ⋃ n : ℕ, t n) ∧
(∀ n : ℕ, ApproximatesLinearOn f (A n) (s ∩ t n) (δ (A n))) ∧
(s.Nonempty → ∀ n, ∃ y ∈ s, A n = f' y) :=
exists_partition_approximatesLinearOn_of_hasFDerivWithinAt f s f' hf' δ fun A => (hδ A).1.ne'
calc
μ (f '' s) ≤ μ (⋃ n, f '' (s ∩ t n)) := by
apply measure_mono
rw [← image_iUnion, ← inter_iUnion]
exact image_subset f (subset_inter Subset.rfl t_cover)
_ ≤ ∑' n, μ (f '' (s ∩ t n)) := measure_iUnion_le _
_ ≤ ∑' n, (ENNReal.ofReal |(A n).det| + ε) * μ (s ∩ t n) := by
apply ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun n => ?_
apply (hδ (A n)).2.2
exact ht n
_ = ∑' n, ∫⁻ _ in s ∩ t n, ENNReal.ofReal |(A n).det| + ε ∂μ := by
simp only [lintegral_const, MeasurableSet.univ, Measure.restrict_apply, univ_inter]
_ ≤ ∑' n, ∫⁻ x in s ∩ t n, ENNReal.ofReal |(f' x).det| + 2 * ε ∂μ := by
apply ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun n => ?_
apply lintegral_mono_ae
filter_upwards [(ht n).norm_fderiv_sub_le μ (hs.inter (t_meas n)) f' fun x hx =>
(hf' x hx.1).mono inter_subset_left]
intro x hx
have I : |(A n).det| ≤ |(f' x).det| + ε :=
calc
|(A n).det| = |(f' x).det - ((f' x).det - (A n).det)| := by congr 1; abel
_ ≤ |(f' x).det| + |(f' x).det - (A n).det| := abs_sub _ _
_ ≤ |(f' x).det| + ε := add_le_add le_rfl ((hδ (A n)).2.1 _ hx)
calc
ENNReal.ofReal |(A n).det| + ε ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (|(f' x).det| + ε) + ε := by gcongr
_ = ENNReal.ofReal |(f' x).det| + 2 * ε := by
simp only [ENNReal.ofReal_add, abs_nonneg, two_mul, add_assoc, NNReal.zero_le_coe,
ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal]
_ = ∫⁻ x in ⋃ n, s ∩ t n, ENNReal.ofReal |(f' x).det| + 2 * ε ∂μ := by
have M : ∀ n : ℕ, MeasurableSet (s ∩ t n) := fun n => hs.inter (t_meas n)
rw [lintegral_iUnion M]
exact pairwise_disjoint_mono t_disj fun n => inter_subset_right
_ = ∫⁻ x in s, ENNReal.ofReal |(f' x).det| + 2 * ε ∂μ := by
rw [← inter_iUnion, inter_eq_self_of_subset_left t_cover]
_ = (∫⁻ x in s, ENNReal.ofReal |(f' x).det| ∂μ) + 2 * ε * μ s := by
simp only [lintegral_add_right' _ aemeasurable_const, set_lintegral_const]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.ENNReal
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Dirac
#align_import probability.probability_mass_function.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4ac69b290818724c159de091daa3acd31da0ee6d"
noncomputable section
variable {α β γ : Type*}
open scoped Classical
open NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
def PMF.{u} (α : Type u) : Type u :=
{ f : α → ℝ≥0∞ // HasSum f 1 }
#align pmf PMF
namespace PMF
instance instFunLike : FunLike (PMF α) α ℝ≥0∞ where
coe p a := p.1 a
coe_injective' _ _ h := Subtype.eq h
#align pmf.fun_like PMF.instFunLike
@[ext]
protected theorem ext {p q : PMF α} (h : ∀ x, p x = q x) : p = q :=
DFunLike.ext p q h
#align pmf.ext PMF.ext
theorem ext_iff {p q : PMF α} : p = q ↔ ∀ x, p x = q x :=
DFunLike.ext_iff
#align pmf.ext_iff PMF.ext_iff
theorem hasSum_coe_one (p : PMF α) : HasSum p 1 :=
p.2
#align pmf.has_sum_coe_one PMF.hasSum_coe_one
@[simp]
theorem tsum_coe (p : PMF α) : ∑' a, p a = 1 :=
p.hasSum_coe_one.tsum_eq
#align pmf.tsum_coe PMF.tsum_coe
theorem tsum_coe_ne_top (p : PMF α) : ∑' a, p a ≠ ∞ :=
p.tsum_coe.symm ▸ ENNReal.one_ne_top
#align pmf.tsum_coe_ne_top PMF.tsum_coe_ne_top
theorem tsum_coe_indicator_ne_top (p : PMF α) (s : Set α) : ∑' a, s.indicator p a ≠ ∞ :=
ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt
(tsum_le_tsum (fun _ => Set.indicator_apply_le fun _ => le_rfl) ENNReal.summable
ENNReal.summable)
(lt_of_le_of_ne le_top p.tsum_coe_ne_top))
#align pmf.tsum_coe_indicator_ne_top PMF.tsum_coe_indicator_ne_top
@[simp]
theorem coe_ne_zero (p : PMF α) : ⇑p ≠ 0 := fun hp =>
zero_ne_one ((tsum_zero.symm.trans (tsum_congr fun x => symm (congr_fun hp x))).trans p.tsum_coe)
#align pmf.coe_ne_zero PMF.coe_ne_zero
def support (p : PMF α) : Set α :=
Function.support p
#align pmf.support PMF.support
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff (p : PMF α) (a : α) : a ∈ p.support ↔ p a ≠ 0 := Iff.rfl
#align pmf.mem_support_iff PMF.mem_support_iff
@[simp]
theorem support_nonempty (p : PMF α) : p.support.Nonempty :=
Function.support_nonempty_iff.2 p.coe_ne_zero
#align pmf.support_nonempty PMF.support_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem support_countable (p : PMF α) : p.support.Countable :=
Summable.countable_support_ennreal (tsum_coe_ne_top p)
theorem apply_eq_zero_iff (p : PMF α) (a : α) : p a = 0 ↔ a ∉ p.support := by
rw [mem_support_iff, Classical.not_not]
#align pmf.apply_eq_zero_iff PMF.apply_eq_zero_iff
theorem apply_pos_iff (p : PMF α) (a : α) : 0 < p a ↔ a ∈ p.support :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans (p.mem_support_iff a).symm
#align pmf.apply_pos_iff PMF.apply_pos_iff
theorem apply_eq_one_iff (p : PMF α) (a : α) : p a = 1 ↔ p.support = {a} := by
refine ⟨fun h => Set.Subset.antisymm (fun a' ha' => by_contra fun ha => ?_)
fun a' ha' => ha'.symm ▸ (p.mem_support_iff a).2 fun ha => zero_ne_one <| ha.symm.trans h,
fun h => _root_.trans (symm <| tsum_eq_single a
fun a' ha' => (p.apply_eq_zero_iff a').2 (h.symm ▸ ha')) p.tsum_coe⟩
suffices 1 < ∑' a, p a from ne_of_lt this p.tsum_coe.symm
have : 0 < ∑' b, ite (b = a) 0 (p b) := lt_of_le_of_ne' zero_le'
((tsum_ne_zero_iff ENNReal.summable).2
⟨a', ite_ne_left_iff.2 ⟨ha, Ne.symm <| (p.mem_support_iff a').2 ha'⟩⟩)
calc
1 = 1 + 0 := (add_zero 1).symm
_ < p a + ∑' b, ite (b = a) 0 (p b) :=
(ENNReal.add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt ENNReal.one_ne_top (le_of_eq h.symm) this)
_ = ite (a = a) (p a) 0 + ∑' b, ite (b = a) 0 (p b) := by rw [eq_self_iff_true, if_true]
_ = (∑' b, ite (b = a) (p b) 0) + ∑' b, ite (b = a) 0 (p b) := by
congr
exact symm (tsum_eq_single a fun b hb => if_neg hb)
_ = ∑' b, (ite (b = a) (p b) 0 + ite (b = a) 0 (p b)) := ENNReal.tsum_add.symm
_ = ∑' b, p b := tsum_congr fun b => by split_ifs <;> simp only [zero_add, add_zero, le_rfl]
#align pmf.apply_eq_one_iff PMF.apply_eq_one_iff
theorem coe_le_one (p : PMF α) (a : α) : p a ≤ 1 := by
refine hasSum_le (fun b => ?_) (hasSum_ite_eq a (p a)) (hasSum_coe_one p)
split_ifs with h <;> simp only [h, zero_le', le_rfl]
#align pmf.coe_le_one PMF.coe_le_one
theorem apply_ne_top (p : PMF α) (a : α) : p a ≠ ∞ :=
ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt (p.coe_le_one a) ENNReal.one_lt_top)
#align pmf.apply_ne_top PMF.apply_ne_top
theorem apply_lt_top (p : PMF α) (a : α) : p a < ∞ :=
lt_of_le_of_ne le_top (p.apply_ne_top a)
#align pmf.apply_lt_top PMF.apply_lt_top
section OuterMeasure
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure
def toOuterMeasure (p : PMF α) : OuterMeasure α :=
OuterMeasure.sum fun x : α => p x • dirac x
#align pmf.to_outer_measure PMF.toOuterMeasure
variable (p : PMF α) (s t : Set α)
theorem toOuterMeasure_apply : p.toOuterMeasure s = ∑' x, s.indicator p x :=
tsum_congr fun x => smul_dirac_apply (p x) x s
#align pmf.to_outer_measure_apply PMF.toOuterMeasure_apply
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_caratheodory : p.toOuterMeasure.caratheodory = ⊤ := by
refine eq_top_iff.2 <| le_trans (le_sInf fun x hx => ?_) (le_sum_caratheodory _)
have ⟨y, hy⟩ := hx
exact
((le_of_eq (dirac_caratheodory y).symm).trans (le_smul_caratheodory _ _)).trans (le_of_eq hy)
#align pmf.to_outer_measure_caratheodory PMF.toOuterMeasure_caratheodory
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_apply_finset (s : Finset α) : p.toOuterMeasure s = ∑ x ∈ s, p x := by
refine (toOuterMeasure_apply p s).trans ((tsum_eq_sum (s := s) ?_).trans ?_)
· exact fun x hx => Set.indicator_of_not_mem (Finset.mem_coe.not.2 hx) _
· exact Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x hx => Set.indicator_of_mem (Finset.mem_coe.2 hx) _
#align pmf.to_outer_measure_apply_finset PMF.toOuterMeasure_apply_finset
theorem toOuterMeasure_apply_singleton (a : α) : p.toOuterMeasure {a} = p a := by
refine (p.toOuterMeasure_apply {a}).trans ((tsum_eq_single a fun b hb => ?_).trans ?_)
· exact ite_eq_right_iff.2 fun hb' => False.elim <| hb hb'
· exact ite_eq_left_iff.2 fun ha' => False.elim <| ha' rfl
#align pmf.to_outer_measure_apply_singleton PMF.toOuterMeasure_apply_singleton
theorem toOuterMeasure_injective : (toOuterMeasure : PMF α → OuterMeasure α).Injective :=
fun p q h => PMF.ext fun x => (p.toOuterMeasure_apply_singleton x).symm.trans
((congr_fun (congr_arg _ h) _).trans <| q.toOuterMeasure_apply_singleton x)
#align pmf.to_outer_measure_injective PMF.toOuterMeasure_injective
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_inj {p q : PMF α} : p.toOuterMeasure = q.toOuterMeasure ↔ p = q :=
toOuterMeasure_injective.eq_iff
#align pmf.to_outer_measure_inj PMF.toOuterMeasure_inj
theorem toOuterMeasure_apply_eq_zero_iff : p.toOuterMeasure s = 0 ↔ Disjoint p.support s := by
rw [toOuterMeasure_apply, ENNReal.tsum_eq_zero]
exact Function.funext_iff.symm.trans Set.indicator_eq_zero'
#align pmf.to_outer_measure_apply_eq_zero_iff PMF.toOuterMeasure_apply_eq_zero_iff
| Mathlib/Probability/ProbabilityMassFunction/Basic.lean | 201 | 211 | theorem toOuterMeasure_apply_eq_one_iff : p.toOuterMeasure s = 1 ↔ p.support ⊆ s := by |
refine (p.toOuterMeasure_apply s).symm ▸ ⟨fun h a hap => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· refine by_contra fun hs => ne_of_lt ?_ (h.trans p.tsum_coe.symm)
have hs' : s.indicator p a = 0 := Set.indicator_apply_eq_zero.2 fun hs' => False.elim <| hs hs'
have hsa : s.indicator p a < p a := hs'.symm ▸ (p.apply_pos_iff a).2 hap
exact ENNReal.tsum_lt_tsum (p.tsum_coe_indicator_ne_top s)
(fun x => Set.indicator_apply_le fun _ => le_rfl) hsa
· suffices ∀ (x) (_ : x ∉ s), p x = 0 from
_root_.trans (tsum_congr
fun a => (Set.indicator_apply s p a).trans (ite_eq_left_iff.2 <| symm ∘ this a)) p.tsum_coe
exact fun a ha => (p.apply_eq_zero_iff a).2 <| Set.not_mem_subset h ha
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Regular
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SimpleFuncDenseLp
import Mathlib.Topology.UrysohnsLemma
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner
#align_import measure_theory.function.continuous_map_dense from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e0736bb5b48bdadbca19dbd857e12bee38ccfbb8"
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Topology BoundedContinuousFunction
open MeasureTheory TopologicalSpace ContinuousMap Set Bornology
variable {α : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace α] [T4Space α] [BorelSpace α]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] {μ : Measure α} {p : ℝ≥0∞}
namespace MeasureTheory
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E]
theorem exists_continuous_snorm_sub_le_of_closed [μ.OuterRegular] (hp : p ≠ ∞) {s u : Set α}
(s_closed : IsClosed s) (u_open : IsOpen u) (hsu : s ⊆ u) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (c : E) {ε : ℝ≥0∞}
(hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ f : α → E,
Continuous f ∧
snorm (fun x => f x - s.indicator (fun _y => c) x) p μ ≤ ε ∧
(∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖c‖) ∧ Function.support f ⊆ u ∧ Memℒp f p μ := by
obtain ⟨η, η_pos, hη⟩ :
∃ η : ℝ≥0, 0 < η ∧ ∀ s : Set α, μ s ≤ η → snorm (s.indicator fun _x => c) p μ ≤ ε :=
exists_snorm_indicator_le hp c hε
have ηpos : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) < η := ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.2 η_pos
obtain ⟨V, sV, V_open, h'V, hV⟩ : ∃ (V : Set α), V ⊇ s ∧ IsOpen V ∧ μ V < ∞ ∧ μ (V \ s) < η :=
s_closed.measurableSet.exists_isOpen_diff_lt hs ηpos.ne'
let v := u ∩ V
have hsv : s ⊆ v := subset_inter hsu sV
have hμv : μ v < ∞ := (measure_mono inter_subset_right).trans_lt h'V
obtain ⟨g, hgv, hgs, hg_range⟩ :=
exists_continuous_zero_one_of_isClosed (u_open.inter V_open).isClosed_compl s_closed
(disjoint_compl_left_iff.2 hsv)
-- Multiply this by `c` to get a continuous approximation to the function `f`; the key point is
-- that this is pointwise bounded by the indicator of the set `v \ s`, which has small measure.
have g_norm : ∀ x, ‖g x‖ = g x := fun x => by rw [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg (hg_range x).1]
have gc_bd0 : ∀ x, ‖g x • c‖ ≤ ‖c‖ := by
intro x
simp only [norm_smul, g_norm x]
apply mul_le_of_le_one_left (norm_nonneg _)
exact (hg_range x).2
have gc_bd :
∀ x, ‖g x • c - s.indicator (fun _x => c) x‖ ≤ ‖(v \ s).indicator (fun _x => c) x‖ := by
intro x
by_cases hv : x ∈ v
· rw [← Set.diff_union_of_subset hsv] at hv
cases' hv with hsv hs
· simpa only [hsv.2, Set.indicator_of_not_mem, not_false_iff, sub_zero, hsv,
Set.indicator_of_mem] using gc_bd0 x
· simp [hgs hs, hs]
· simp [hgv hv, show x ∉ s from fun h => hv (hsv h)]
have gc_support : (Function.support fun x : α => g x • c) ⊆ v := by
refine Function.support_subset_iff'.2 fun x hx => ?_
simp only [hgv hx, Pi.zero_apply, zero_smul]
have gc_mem : Memℒp (fun x => g x • c) p μ := by
refine Memℒp.smul_of_top_left (memℒp_top_const _) ?_
refine ⟨g.continuous.aestronglyMeasurable, ?_⟩
have : snorm (v.indicator fun _x => (1 : ℝ)) p μ < ⊤ := by
refine (snorm_indicator_const_le _ _).trans_lt ?_
simp only [lt_top_iff_ne_top, hμv.ne, nnnorm_one, ENNReal.coe_one, one_div, one_mul, Ne,
ENNReal.rpow_eq_top_iff, inv_lt_zero, false_and_iff, or_false_iff, not_and, not_lt,
ENNReal.toReal_nonneg, imp_true_iff]
refine (snorm_mono fun x => ?_).trans_lt this
by_cases hx : x ∈ v
· simp only [hx, abs_of_nonneg (hg_range x).1, (hg_range x).2, Real.norm_eq_abs,
indicator_of_mem, CstarRing.norm_one]
· simp only [hgv hx, Pi.zero_apply, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_zero, abs_nonneg]
refine
⟨fun x => g x • c, g.continuous.smul continuous_const, (snorm_mono gc_bd).trans ?_, gc_bd0,
gc_support.trans inter_subset_left, gc_mem⟩
exact hη _ ((measure_mono (diff_subset_diff inter_subset_right Subset.rfl)).trans hV.le)
#align measure_theory.exists_continuous_snorm_sub_le_of_closed MeasureTheory.exists_continuous_snorm_sub_le_of_closed
theorem Memℒp.exists_hasCompactSupport_snorm_sub_le [WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace α] [μ.Regular]
(hp : p ≠ ∞) {f : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ g : α → E, HasCompactSupport g ∧ snorm (f - g) p μ ≤ ε ∧ Continuous g ∧ Memℒp g p μ := by
suffices H :
∃ g : α → E, snorm (f - g) p μ ≤ ε ∧ Continuous g ∧ Memℒp g p μ ∧ HasCompactSupport g by
rcases H with ⟨g, hg, g_cont, g_mem, g_support⟩
exact ⟨g, g_support, hg, g_cont, g_mem⟩
-- It suffices to check that the set of functions we consider approximates characteristic
-- functions, is stable under addition and consists of ae strongly measurable functions.
-- First check the latter easy facts.
apply hf.induction_dense hp _ _ _ _ hε
rotate_left
-- stability under addition
· rintro f g ⟨f_cont, f_mem, hf⟩ ⟨g_cont, g_mem, hg⟩
exact ⟨f_cont.add g_cont, f_mem.add g_mem, hf.add hg⟩
-- ae strong measurability
· rintro f ⟨_f_cont, f_mem, _hf⟩
exact f_mem.aestronglyMeasurable
-- We are left with approximating characteristic functions.
-- This follows from `exists_continuous_snorm_sub_le_of_closed`.
intro c t ht htμ ε hε
rcases exists_Lp_half E μ p hε with ⟨δ, δpos, hδ⟩
obtain ⟨η, ηpos, hη⟩ :
∃ η : ℝ≥0, 0 < η ∧ ∀ s : Set α, μ s ≤ η → snorm (s.indicator fun _x => c) p μ ≤ δ :=
exists_snorm_indicator_le hp c δpos.ne'
have hη_pos' : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) < η := ENNReal.coe_pos.2 ηpos
obtain ⟨s, st, s_compact, μs⟩ : ∃ s, s ⊆ t ∧ IsCompact s ∧ μ (t \ s) < η :=
ht.exists_isCompact_diff_lt htμ.ne hη_pos'.ne'
have hsμ : μ s < ∞ := (measure_mono st).trans_lt htμ
have I1 : snorm ((s.indicator fun _y => c) - t.indicator fun _y => c) p μ ≤ δ := by
rw [← snorm_neg, neg_sub, ← indicator_diff st]
exact hη _ μs.le
obtain ⟨k, k_compact, sk⟩ : ∃ k : Set α, IsCompact k ∧ s ⊆ interior k :=
exists_compact_superset s_compact
rcases exists_continuous_snorm_sub_le_of_closed hp s_compact.isClosed isOpen_interior sk hsμ.ne c
δpos.ne' with
⟨f, f_cont, I2, _f_bound, f_support, f_mem⟩
have I3 : snorm (f - t.indicator fun _y => c) p μ ≤ ε := by
convert
(hδ _ _
(f_mem.aestronglyMeasurable.sub
(aestronglyMeasurable_const.indicator s_compact.measurableSet))
((aestronglyMeasurable_const.indicator s_compact.measurableSet).sub
(aestronglyMeasurable_const.indicator ht))
I2 I1).le using 2
simp only [sub_add_sub_cancel]
refine ⟨f, I3, f_cont, f_mem, HasCompactSupport.intro k_compact fun x hx => ?_⟩
rw [← Function.nmem_support]
contrapose! hx
exact interior_subset (f_support hx)
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.exists_has_compact_support_snorm_sub_le MeasureTheory.Memℒp.exists_hasCompactSupport_snorm_sub_le
theorem Memℒp.exists_hasCompactSupport_integral_rpow_sub_le
[WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace α] [μ.Regular]
{p : ℝ} (hp : 0 < p) {f : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f (ENNReal.ofReal p) μ) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ g : α → E,
HasCompactSupport g ∧
(∫ x, ‖f x - g x‖ ^ p ∂μ) ≤ ε ∧ Continuous g ∧ Memℒp g (ENNReal.ofReal p) μ := by
have I : 0 < ε ^ (1 / p) := Real.rpow_pos_of_pos hε _
have A : ENNReal.ofReal (ε ^ (1 / p)) ≠ 0 := by
simp only [Ne, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, not_le, I]
have B : ENNReal.ofReal p ≠ 0 := by simpa only [Ne, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, not_le] using hp
rcases hf.exists_hasCompactSupport_snorm_sub_le ENNReal.coe_ne_top A with
⟨g, g_support, hg, g_cont, g_mem⟩
change snorm _ (ENNReal.ofReal p) _ ≤ _ at hg
refine ⟨g, g_support, ?_, g_cont, g_mem⟩
rwa [(hf.sub g_mem).snorm_eq_integral_rpow_norm B ENNReal.coe_ne_top,
ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff I.le, one_div, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal hp.le,
Real.rpow_le_rpow_iff _ hε.le (inv_pos.2 hp)] at hg
positivity
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.exists_has_compact_support_integral_rpow_sub_le MeasureTheory.Memℒp.exists_hasCompactSupport_integral_rpow_sub_le
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/ContinuousMapDense.lean | 215 | 221 | theorem Integrable.exists_hasCompactSupport_lintegral_sub_le
[WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace α] [μ.Regular]
{f : α → E} (hf : Integrable f μ) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ g : α → E,
HasCompactSupport g ∧ (∫⁻ x, ‖f x - g x‖₊ ∂μ) ≤ ε ∧ Continuous g ∧ Integrable g μ := by |
simp only [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable, ← snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm] at hf ⊢
exact hf.exists_hasCompactSupport_snorm_sub_le ENNReal.one_ne_top hε
|
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Relator
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Quot
import Mathlib.Tactic.Cases
import Mathlib.Tactic.Use
import Mathlib.Tactic.MkIffOfInductiveProp
import Mathlib.Tactic.SimpRw
#align_import logic.relation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3365b20c2ffa7c35e47e5209b89ba9abdddf3ffe"
open Function
variable {α β γ δ ε ζ : Type*}
namespace Relation
variable {r : α → α → Prop} {a b c d : α}
@[mk_iff ReflTransGen.cases_tail_iff]
inductive ReflTransGen (r : α → α → Prop) (a : α) : α → Prop
| refl : ReflTransGen r a a
| tail {b c} : ReflTransGen r a b → r b c → ReflTransGen r a c
#align relation.refl_trans_gen Relation.ReflTransGen
#align relation.refl_trans_gen.cases_tail_iff Relation.ReflTransGen.cases_tail_iff
attribute [refl] ReflTransGen.refl
@[mk_iff]
inductive ReflGen (r : α → α → Prop) (a : α) : α → Prop
| refl : ReflGen r a a
| single {b} : r a b → ReflGen r a b
#align relation.refl_gen Relation.ReflGen
#align relation.refl_gen_iff Relation.reflGen_iff
@[mk_iff]
inductive TransGen (r : α → α → Prop) (a : α) : α → Prop
| single {b} : r a b → TransGen r a b
| tail {b c} : TransGen r a b → r b c → TransGen r a c
#align relation.trans_gen Relation.TransGen
#align relation.trans_gen_iff Relation.transGen_iff
attribute [refl] ReflGen.refl
| Mathlib/Logic/Relation.lean | 463 | 467 | theorem _root_.Acc.TransGen (h : Acc r a) : Acc (TransGen r) a := by |
induction' h with x _ H
refine Acc.intro x fun y hy ↦ ?_
cases' hy with _ hyx z _ hyz hzx
exacts [H y hyx, (H z hzx).inv hyz]
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Terminal
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.BinaryProducts
#align_import category_theory.limits.shapes.strict_initial from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
universe v u
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace Limits
open Category
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C]
section StrictTerminal
class HasStrictTerminalObjects : Prop where
out : ∀ {I A : C} (f : I ⟶ A), IsTerminal I → IsIso f
#align category_theory.limits.has_strict_terminal_objects CategoryTheory.Limits.HasStrictTerminalObjects
variable {C}
section
variable [HasStrictTerminalObjects C] {I : C}
theorem IsTerminal.isIso_from (hI : IsTerminal I) {A : C} (f : I ⟶ A) : IsIso f :=
HasStrictTerminalObjects.out f hI
#align category_theory.limits.is_terminal.is_iso_from CategoryTheory.Limits.IsTerminal.isIso_from
theorem IsTerminal.strict_hom_ext (hI : IsTerminal I) {A : C} (f g : I ⟶ A) : f = g := by
haveI := hI.isIso_from f
haveI := hI.isIso_from g
exact eq_of_inv_eq_inv (hI.hom_ext (inv f) (inv g))
#align category_theory.limits.is_terminal.strict_hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.IsTerminal.strict_hom_ext
theorem IsTerminal.subsingleton_to (hI : IsTerminal I) {A : C} : Subsingleton (I ⟶ A) :=
⟨hI.strict_hom_ext⟩
#align category_theory.limits.is_terminal.subsingleton_to CategoryTheory.Limits.IsTerminal.subsingleton_to
variable {J : Type v} [SmallCategory J]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/StrictInitial.lean | 206 | 237 | theorem limit_π_isIso_of_is_strict_terminal (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (i : J)
(H : ∀ (j) (_ : j ≠ i), IsTerminal (F.obj j)) [Subsingleton (i ⟶ i)] : IsIso (limit.π F i) := by |
classical
refine ⟨⟨limit.lift _ ⟨_, ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩, ?_, ?_⟩⟩
· exact fun j =>
dite (j = i)
(fun h => eqToHom (by cases h; rfl))
fun h => (H _ h).from _
· intro j k f
split_ifs with h h_1 h_1
· cases h
cases h_1
obtain rfl : f = 𝟙 _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
simp
· cases h
erw [Category.comp_id]
haveI : IsIso (F.map f) := (H _ h_1).isIso_from _
rw [← IsIso.comp_inv_eq]
apply (H _ h_1).hom_ext
· cases h_1
apply (H _ h).hom_ext
· apply (H _ h).hom_ext
· ext
rw [assoc, limit.lift_π]
dsimp only
split_ifs with h
· cases h
rw [id_comp, eqToHom_refl]
exact comp_id _
· apply (H _ h).hom_ext
· rw [limit.lift_π]
simp
|
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Multiplicity
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Algebra
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.IsPoly
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Perfect
#align_import ring_theory.witt_vector.frobenius from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0723536a0522d24fc2f159a096fb3304bef77472"
namespace WittVector
variable {p : ℕ} {R S : Type*} [hp : Fact p.Prime] [CommRing R] [CommRing S]
local notation "𝕎" => WittVector p -- type as `\bbW`
noncomputable section
open MvPolynomial Finset
variable (p)
def frobeniusPolyRat (n : ℕ) : MvPolynomial ℕ ℚ :=
bind₁ (wittPolynomial p ℚ ∘ fun n => n + 1) (xInTermsOfW p ℚ n)
#align witt_vector.frobenius_poly_rat WittVector.frobeniusPolyRat
theorem bind₁_frobeniusPolyRat_wittPolynomial (n : ℕ) :
bind₁ (frobeniusPolyRat p) (wittPolynomial p ℚ n) = wittPolynomial p ℚ (n + 1) := by
delta frobeniusPolyRat
rw [← bind₁_bind₁, bind₁_xInTermsOfW_wittPolynomial, bind₁_X_right, Function.comp_apply]
#align witt_vector.bind₁_frobenius_poly_rat_witt_polynomial WittVector.bind₁_frobeniusPolyRat_wittPolynomial
private def pnat_multiplicity (n : ℕ+) : ℕ :=
(multiplicity p n).get <| multiplicity.finite_nat_iff.mpr <| ⟨ne_of_gt hp.1.one_lt, n.2⟩
local notation "v" => pnat_multiplicity
noncomputable def frobeniusPolyAux : ℕ → MvPolynomial ℕ ℤ
| n => X (n + 1) - ∑ i : Fin n, have _ := i.is_lt
∑ j ∈ range (p ^ (n - i)),
(((X (i : ℕ) ^ p) ^ (p ^ (n - (i : ℕ)) - (j + 1)) : MvPolynomial ℕ ℤ) *
(frobeniusPolyAux i) ^ (j + 1)) *
C (((p ^ (n - i)).choose (j + 1) / (p ^ (n - i - v p ⟨j + 1, Nat.succ_pos j⟩))
* ↑p ^ (j - v p ⟨j + 1, Nat.succ_pos j⟩) : ℕ) : ℤ)
#align witt_vector.frobenius_poly_aux WittVector.frobeniusPolyAux
| Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/Frobenius.lean | 97 | 104 | theorem frobeniusPolyAux_eq (n : ℕ) :
frobeniusPolyAux p n =
X (n + 1) - ∑ i ∈ range n,
∑ j ∈ range (p ^ (n - i)),
(X i ^ p) ^ (p ^ (n - i) - (j + 1)) * frobeniusPolyAux p i ^ (j + 1) *
C ↑((p ^ (n - i)).choose (j + 1) / p ^ (n - i - v p ⟨j + 1, Nat.succ_pos j⟩) *
↑p ^ (j - v p ⟨j + 1, Nat.succ_pos j⟩) : ℕ) := by |
rw [frobeniusPolyAux, ← Fin.sum_univ_eq_sum_range]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Actions
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.Algebra
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.LinearIndependent
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Subring.Units
#align_import linear_algebra.ray from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0f6670b8af2dff699de1c0b4b49039b31bc13c46"
noncomputable section
section StrictOrderedCommSemiring
variable (R : Type*) [StrictOrderedCommSemiring R]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable {N : Type*} [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
variable (ι : Type*) [DecidableEq ι]
def SameRay (v₁ v₂ : M) : Prop :=
v₁ = 0 ∨ v₂ = 0 ∨ ∃ r₁ r₂ : R, 0 < r₁ ∧ 0 < r₂ ∧ r₁ • v₁ = r₂ • v₂
#align same_ray SameRay
variable {R}
namespace SameRay
variable {x y z : M}
@[simp]
theorem zero_left (y : M) : SameRay R 0 y :=
Or.inl rfl
#align same_ray.zero_left SameRay.zero_left
@[simp]
theorem zero_right (x : M) : SameRay R x 0 :=
Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl
#align same_ray.zero_right SameRay.zero_right
@[nontriviality]
theorem of_subsingleton [Subsingleton M] (x y : M) : SameRay R x y := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim x 0]
exact zero_left _
#align same_ray.of_subsingleton SameRay.of_subsingleton
@[nontriviality]
theorem of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton R] (x y : M) : SameRay R x y :=
haveI := Module.subsingleton R M
of_subsingleton x y
#align same_ray.of_subsingleton' SameRay.of_subsingleton'
@[refl]
theorem refl (x : M) : SameRay R x x := by
nontriviality R
exact Or.inr (Or.inr <| ⟨1, 1, zero_lt_one, zero_lt_one, rfl⟩)
#align same_ray.refl SameRay.refl
protected theorem rfl : SameRay R x x :=
refl _
#align same_ray.rfl SameRay.rfl
@[symm]
theorem symm (h : SameRay R x y) : SameRay R y x :=
(or_left_comm.1 h).imp_right <| Or.imp_right fun ⟨r₁, r₂, h₁, h₂, h⟩ => ⟨r₂, r₁, h₂, h₁, h.symm⟩
#align same_ray.symm SameRay.symm
theorem exists_pos (h : SameRay R x y) (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
∃ r₁ r₂ : R, 0 < r₁ ∧ 0 < r₂ ∧ r₁ • x = r₂ • y :=
(h.resolve_left hx).resolve_left hy
#align same_ray.exists_pos SameRay.exists_pos
theorem sameRay_comm : SameRay R x y ↔ SameRay R y x :=
⟨SameRay.symm, SameRay.symm⟩
#align same_ray_comm SameRay.sameRay_comm
theorem trans (hxy : SameRay R x y) (hyz : SameRay R y z) (hy : y = 0 → x = 0 ∨ z = 0) :
SameRay R x z := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx); · exact zero_left z
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | hz); · exact zero_right x
rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with (rfl | hy);
· exact (hy rfl).elim (fun h => (hx h).elim) fun h => (hz h).elim
rcases hxy.exists_pos hx hy with ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, h₁⟩
rcases hyz.exists_pos hy hz with ⟨r₃, r₄, hr₃, hr₄, h₂⟩
refine Or.inr (Or.inr <| ⟨r₃ * r₁, r₂ * r₄, mul_pos hr₃ hr₁, mul_pos hr₂ hr₄, ?_⟩)
rw [mul_smul, mul_smul, h₁, ← h₂, smul_comm]
#align same_ray.trans SameRay.trans
variable {S : Type*} [OrderedCommSemiring S] [Algebra S R] [Module S M] [SMulPosMono S R]
[IsScalarTower S R M] {a : S}
lemma sameRay_nonneg_smul_right (v : M) (h : 0 ≤ a) : SameRay R v (a • v) := by
obtain h | h := (algebraMap_nonneg R h).eq_or_gt
· rw [← algebraMap_smul R a v, h, zero_smul]
exact zero_right _
· refine Or.inr $ Or.inr ⟨algebraMap S R a, 1, h, by nontriviality R; exact zero_lt_one, ?_⟩
rw [algebraMap_smul, one_smul]
#align same_ray_nonneg_smul_right SameRay.sameRay_nonneg_smul_right
lemma sameRay_nonneg_smul_left (v : M) (ha : 0 ≤ a) : SameRay R (a • v) v :=
(sameRay_nonneg_smul_right v ha).symm
#align same_ray_nonneg_smul_left SameRay.sameRay_nonneg_smul_left
lemma sameRay_pos_smul_right (v : M) (ha : 0 < a) : SameRay R v (a • v) :=
sameRay_nonneg_smul_right v ha.le
#align same_ray_pos_smul_right SameRay.sameRay_pos_smul_right
lemma sameRay_pos_smul_left (v : M) (ha : 0 < a) : SameRay R (a • v) v :=
sameRay_nonneg_smul_left v ha.le
#align same_ray_pos_smul_left SameRay.sameRay_pos_smul_left
lemma nonneg_smul_right (h : SameRay R x y) (ha : 0 ≤ a) : SameRay R x (a • y) :=
h.trans (sameRay_nonneg_smul_right y ha) fun hy => Or.inr <| by rw [hy, smul_zero]
#align same_ray.nonneg_smul_right SameRay.nonneg_smul_right
lemma nonneg_smul_left (h : SameRay R x y) (ha : 0 ≤ a) : SameRay R (a • x) y :=
(h.symm.nonneg_smul_right ha).symm
#align same_ray.nonneg_smul_left SameRay.nonneg_smul_left
theorem pos_smul_right (h : SameRay R x y) (ha : 0 < a) : SameRay R x (a • y) :=
h.nonneg_smul_right ha.le
#align same_ray.pos_smul_right SameRay.pos_smul_right
theorem pos_smul_left (h : SameRay R x y) (hr : 0 < a) : SameRay R (a • x) y :=
h.nonneg_smul_left hr.le
#align same_ray.pos_smul_left SameRay.pos_smul_left
theorem map (f : M →ₗ[R] N) (h : SameRay R x y) : SameRay R (f x) (f y) :=
(h.imp fun hx => by rw [hx, map_zero]) <|
Or.imp (fun hy => by rw [hy, map_zero]) fun ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, h⟩ =>
⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, by rw [← f.map_smul, ← f.map_smul, h]⟩
#align same_ray.map SameRay.map
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.sameRay_map_iff
{F : Type*} [FunLike F M N] [LinearMapClass F R M N]
{f : F} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
SameRay R (f x) (f y) ↔ SameRay R x y := by
simp only [SameRay, map_zero, ← hf.eq_iff, map_smul]
#align function.injective.same_ray_map_iff Function.Injective.sameRay_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem sameRay_map_iff (e : M ≃ₗ[R] N) : SameRay R (e x) (e y) ↔ SameRay R x y :=
Function.Injective.sameRay_map_iff (EquivLike.injective e)
#align same_ray_map_iff SameRay.sameRay_map_iff
theorem smul {S : Type*} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S M] [SMulCommClass R S M]
(h : SameRay R x y) (s : S) : SameRay R (s • x) (s • y) :=
h.map (s • (LinearMap.id : M →ₗ[R] M))
#align same_ray.smul SameRay.smul
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Ray.lean | 192 | 201 | theorem add_left (hx : SameRay R x z) (hy : SameRay R y z) : SameRay R (x + y) z := by |
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx₀); · rwa [zero_add]
rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with (rfl | hy₀); · rwa [add_zero]
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | hz₀); · apply zero_right
rcases hx.exists_pos hx₀ hz₀ with ⟨rx, rz₁, hrx, hrz₁, Hx⟩
rcases hy.exists_pos hy₀ hz₀ with ⟨ry, rz₂, hry, hrz₂, Hy⟩
refine Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨rx * ry, ry * rz₁ + rx * rz₂, mul_pos hrx hry, ?_, ?_⟩)
· apply_rules [add_pos, mul_pos]
· simp only [mul_smul, smul_add, add_smul, ← Hx, ← Hy]
rw [smul_comm]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Order
#align_import topology.maps from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d91e7f7a7f1c7e9f0e18fdb6bde4f652004c735d"
open Set Filter Function
open TopologicalSpace Topology Filter
variable {X : Type*} {Y : Type*} {Z : Type*} {ι : Type*} {f : X → Y} {g : Y → Z}
section OpenMap
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z]
namespace IsOpenMap
protected theorem id : IsOpenMap (@id X) := fun s hs => by rwa [image_id]
#align is_open_map.id IsOpenMap.id
protected theorem comp (hg : IsOpenMap g) (hf : IsOpenMap f) :
IsOpenMap (g ∘ f) := fun s hs => by rw [image_comp]; exact hg _ (hf _ hs)
#align is_open_map.comp IsOpenMap.comp
theorem isOpen_range (hf : IsOpenMap f) : IsOpen (range f) := by
rw [← image_univ]
exact hf _ isOpen_univ
#align is_open_map.is_open_range IsOpenMap.isOpen_range
theorem image_mem_nhds (hf : IsOpenMap f) {x : X} {s : Set X} (hx : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : f '' s ∈ 𝓝 (f x) :=
let ⟨t, hts, ht, hxt⟩ := mem_nhds_iff.1 hx
mem_of_superset (IsOpen.mem_nhds (hf t ht) (mem_image_of_mem _ hxt)) (image_subset _ hts)
#align is_open_map.image_mem_nhds IsOpenMap.image_mem_nhds
theorem range_mem_nhds (hf : IsOpenMap f) (x : X) : range f ∈ 𝓝 (f x) :=
hf.isOpen_range.mem_nhds <| mem_range_self _
#align is_open_map.range_mem_nhds IsOpenMap.range_mem_nhds
theorem mapsTo_interior (hf : IsOpenMap f) {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (h : MapsTo f s t) :
MapsTo f (interior s) (interior t) :=
mapsTo'.2 <|
interior_maximal (h.mono interior_subset Subset.rfl).image_subset (hf _ isOpen_interior)
#align is_open_map.maps_to_interior IsOpenMap.mapsTo_interior
theorem image_interior_subset (hf : IsOpenMap f) (s : Set X) :
f '' interior s ⊆ interior (f '' s) :=
(hf.mapsTo_interior (mapsTo_image f s)).image_subset
#align is_open_map.image_interior_subset IsOpenMap.image_interior_subset
theorem nhds_le (hf : IsOpenMap f) (x : X) : 𝓝 (f x) ≤ (𝓝 x).map f :=
le_map fun _ => hf.image_mem_nhds
#align is_open_map.nhds_le IsOpenMap.nhds_le
theorem of_nhds_le (hf : ∀ x, 𝓝 (f x) ≤ map f (𝓝 x)) : IsOpenMap f := fun _s hs =>
isOpen_iff_mem_nhds.2 fun _y ⟨_x, hxs, hxy⟩ => hxy ▸ hf _ (image_mem_map <| hs.mem_nhds hxs)
#align is_open_map.of_nhds_le IsOpenMap.of_nhds_le
| Mathlib/Topology/Maps.lean | 371 | 378 | theorem of_sections
(h : ∀ x, ∃ g : Y → X, ContinuousAt g (f x) ∧ g (f x) = x ∧ RightInverse g f) : IsOpenMap f :=
of_nhds_le fun x =>
let ⟨g, hgc, hgx, hgf⟩ := h x
calc
𝓝 (f x) = map f (map g (𝓝 (f x))) := by | rw [map_map, hgf.comp_eq_id, map_id]
_ ≤ map f (𝓝 (g (f x))) := map_mono hgc
_ = map f (𝓝 x) := by rw [hgx]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Angle
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse
#align_import analysis.special_functions.complex.arg from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2c1d8ca2812b64f88992a5294ea3dba144755cd1"
open Filter Metric Set
open scoped ComplexConjugate Real Topology
namespace Complex
variable {a x z : ℂ}
noncomputable def arg (x : ℂ) : ℝ :=
if 0 ≤ x.re then Real.arcsin (x.im / abs x)
else if 0 ≤ x.im then Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) + π else Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) - π
#align complex.arg Complex.arg
theorem sin_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.sin (arg x) = x.im / abs x := by
unfold arg; split_ifs <;>
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, arg,
Real.sin_arcsin (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_abs_le_one x)).1 (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_abs_le_one x)).2,
Real.sin_add, neg_div, Real.arcsin_neg, Real.sin_neg]
#align complex.sin_arg Complex.sin_arg
theorem cos_arg {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Real.cos (arg x) = x.re / abs x := by
rw [arg]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_sq, (abs.pos hx).le, *]
· rw [Real.cos_add_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
· rw [Real.cos_sub_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
#align complex.cos_arg Complex.cos_arg
@[simp]
theorem abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I (x : ℂ) : ↑(abs x) * exp (arg x * I) = x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· have : abs x ≠ 0 := abs.ne_zero hx
apply Complex.ext <;> field_simp [sin_arg, cos_arg hx, this, mul_comm (abs x)]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I Complex.abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I
@[simp]
theorem abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (x : ℂ) : (abs x * (cos (arg x) + sin (arg x) * I) : ℂ) = x := by
rw [← exp_mul_I, abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I Complex.abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I
@[simp]
lemma abs_mul_cos_arg (x : ℂ) : abs x * Real.cos (arg x) = x.re := by
simpa [-abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg re (abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
@[simp]
lemma abs_mul_sin_arg (x : ℂ) : abs x * Real.sin (arg x) = x.im := by
simpa [-abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg im (abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
theorem abs_eq_one_iff (z : ℂ) : abs z = 1 ↔ ∃ θ : ℝ, exp (θ * I) = z := by
refine ⟨fun hz => ⟨arg z, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· calc
exp (arg z * I) = abs z * exp (arg z * I) := by rw [hz, ofReal_one, one_mul]
_ = z := abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I z
· rintro ⟨θ, rfl⟩
exact Complex.abs_exp_ofReal_mul_I θ
#align complex.abs_eq_one_iff Complex.abs_eq_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem range_exp_mul_I : (Set.range fun x : ℝ => exp (x * I)) = Metric.sphere 0 1 := by
ext x
simp only [mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm, norm_eq_abs, abs_eq_one_iff, Set.mem_range]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.range_exp_mul_I Complex.range_exp_mul_I
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) :
arg (r * (cos θ + sin θ * I)) = θ := by
simp only [arg, map_mul, abs_cos_add_sin_mul_I, abs_of_nonneg hr.le, mul_one]
simp only [re_ofReal_mul, im_ofReal_mul, neg_im, ← ofReal_cos, ← ofReal_sin, ←
mk_eq_add_mul_I, neg_div, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hr.ne', mul_nonneg_iff_right_nonneg_of_pos hr]
by_cases h₁ : θ ∈ Set.Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)
· rw [if_pos]
exacts [Real.arcsin_sin' h₁, Real.cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc h₁]
· rw [Set.mem_Icc, not_and_or, not_le, not_le] at h₁
cases' h₁ with h₁ h₁
· replace hθ := hθ.1
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := by
rw [← neg_pos, ← Real.cos_add_pi]
refine Real.cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> linarith
have hsin : Real.sin θ < 0 := Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt (by linarith) hθ
rw [if_neg, if_neg, ← Real.sin_add_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, add_sub_cancel_right] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin.not_le; exact hcos.not_le]
· replace hθ := hθ.2
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := Real.cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt h₁ (by linarith)
have hsin : 0 ≤ Real.sin θ := Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith, hθ⟩
rw [if_neg, if_pos, ← Real.sin_sub_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, sub_add_cancel] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin; exact hcos.not_le]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I Complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) : arg (cos θ + sin θ * I) = θ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I zero_lt_one hθ]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I Complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I
lemma arg_exp_mul_I (θ : ℝ) :
arg (exp (θ * I)) = toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ := by
convert arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I (θ := toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ) _ using 2
· rw [← exp_mul_I, eq_sub_of_add_eq $ toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul _ _ θ, ofReal_sub,
ofReal_zsmul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, exp_mul_I_periodic.sub_zsmul_eq]
· convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ _
ring
@[simp]
theorem arg_zero : arg 0 = 0 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
#align complex.arg_zero Complex.arg_zero
theorem ext_abs_arg {x y : ℂ} (h₁ : abs x = abs y) (h₂ : x.arg = y.arg) : x = y := by
rw [← abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I x, ← abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I y, h₁, h₂]
#align complex.ext_abs_arg Complex.ext_abs_arg
theorem ext_abs_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} : x = y ↔ abs x = abs y ∧ arg x = arg y :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, and_imp.2 ext_abs_arg⟩
#align complex.ext_abs_arg_iff Complex.ext_abs_arg_iff
theorem arg_mem_Ioc (z : ℂ) : arg z ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
have hπ : 0 < π := Real.pi_pos
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | hz)
· simp [hπ, hπ.le]
rcases existsUnique_add_zsmul_mem_Ioc Real.two_pi_pos (arg z) (-π) with ⟨N, hN, -⟩
rw [two_mul, neg_add_cancel_left, ← two_mul, zsmul_eq_mul] at hN
rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, ← cos_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N, ← sin_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N]
have := arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (abs.pos hz) hN
push_cast at this
rwa [this]
#align complex.arg_mem_Ioc Complex.arg_mem_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem range_arg : Set.range arg = Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
(Set.range_subset_iff.2 arg_mem_Ioc).antisymm fun _ hx => ⟨_, arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I hx⟩
#align complex.range_arg Complex.range_arg
theorem arg_le_pi (x : ℂ) : arg x ≤ π :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).2
#align complex.arg_le_pi Complex.arg_le_pi
theorem neg_pi_lt_arg (x : ℂ) : -π < arg x :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).1
#align complex.neg_pi_lt_arg Complex.neg_pi_lt_arg
theorem abs_arg_le_pi (z : ℂ) : |arg z| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_arg z).le, arg_le_pi z⟩
#align complex.abs_arg_le_pi Complex.abs_arg_le_pi
@[simp]
theorem arg_nonneg_iff {z : ℂ} : 0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ z.im := by
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | h₀); · simp
calc
0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ Real.sin (arg z) :=
⟨fun h => Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨h, arg_le_pi z⟩, by
contrapose!
intro h
exact Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h (neg_pi_lt_arg _)⟩
_ ↔ _ := by rw [sin_arg, le_div_iff (abs.pos h₀), zero_mul]
#align complex.arg_nonneg_iff Complex.arg_nonneg_iff
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < 0 ↔ z.im < 0 :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arg_nonneg_iff
#align complex.arg_neg_iff Complex.arg_neg_iff
theorem arg_real_mul (x : ℂ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : arg (r * x) = arg x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx); · rw [mul_zero]
conv_lhs =>
rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x, ← mul_assoc, ← ofReal_mul,
arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (mul_pos hr (abs.pos hx)) x.arg_mem_Ioc]
#align complex.arg_real_mul Complex.arg_real_mul
theorem arg_mul_real {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (x : ℂ) : arg (x * r) = arg x :=
mul_comm x r ▸ arg_real_mul x hr
theorem arg_eq_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
arg x = arg y ↔ (abs y / abs x : ℂ) * x = y := by
simp only [ext_abs_arg_iff, map_mul, map_div₀, abs_ofReal, abs_abs,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ (abs.ne_zero hx), eq_self_iff_true, true_and_iff]
rw [← ofReal_div, arg_real_mul]
exact div_pos (abs.pos hy) (abs.pos hx)
#align complex.arg_eq_arg_iff Complex.arg_eq_arg_iff
@[simp]
theorem arg_one : arg 1 = 0 := by simp [arg, zero_le_one]
#align complex.arg_one Complex.arg_one
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_one : arg (-1) = π := by simp [arg, le_refl, not_le.2 (zero_lt_one' ℝ)]
#align complex.arg_neg_one Complex.arg_neg_one
@[simp]
theorem arg_I : arg I = π / 2 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_I Complex.arg_I
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_I : arg (-I) = -(π / 2) := by simp [arg, le_refl]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_neg_I Complex.arg_neg_I
@[simp]
theorem tan_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.tan (arg x) = x.im / x.re := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp only [h, zero_div, Complex.zero_im, Complex.arg_zero, Real.tan_zero, Complex.zero_re]
rw [Real.tan_eq_sin_div_cos, sin_arg, cos_arg h, div_div_div_cancel_right _ (abs.ne_zero h)]
#align complex.tan_arg Complex.tan_arg
theorem arg_ofReal_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : arg x = 0 := by simp [arg, hx]
#align complex.arg_of_real_of_nonneg Complex.arg_ofReal_of_nonneg
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma natCast_arg {n : ℕ} : arg n = 0 :=
ofReal_natCast n ▸ arg_ofReal_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_arg {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] : arg (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) = 0 :=
natCast_arg
theorem arg_eq_zero_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = 0 ↔ 0 ≤ z.re ∧ z.im = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [abs.nonneg]
· cases' z with x y
rintro ⟨h, rfl : y = 0⟩
exact arg_ofReal_of_nonneg h
#align complex.arg_eq_zero_iff Complex.arg_eq_zero_iff
open ComplexOrder in
lemma arg_eq_zero_iff_zero_le {z : ℂ} : arg z = 0 ↔ 0 ≤ z := by
rw [arg_eq_zero_iff, eq_comm, nonneg_iff]
theorem arg_eq_pi_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = π ↔ z.re < 0 ∧ z.im = 0 := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0
· simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_ne_zero.symm]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· cases' z with x y
rintro ⟨h : x < 0, rfl : y = 0⟩
rw [← arg_neg_one, ← arg_real_mul (-1) (neg_pos.2 h)]
simp [← ofReal_def]
#align complex.arg_eq_pi_iff Complex.arg_eq_pi_iff
open ComplexOrder in
lemma arg_eq_pi_iff_lt_zero {z : ℂ} : arg z = π ↔ z < 0 := arg_eq_pi_iff
theorem arg_lt_pi_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < π ↔ 0 ≤ z.re ∨ z.im ≠ 0 := by
rw [(arg_le_pi z).lt_iff_ne, not_iff_comm, not_or, not_le, Classical.not_not, arg_eq_pi_iff]
#align complex.arg_lt_pi_iff Complex.arg_lt_pi_iff
theorem arg_ofReal_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) : arg x = π :=
arg_eq_pi_iff.2 ⟨hx, rfl⟩
#align complex.arg_of_real_of_neg Complex.arg_ofReal_of_neg
theorem arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = π / 2 ↔ z.re = 0 ∧ 0 < z.im := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0; · simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_div_two_pos.ne]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· cases' z with x y
rintro ⟨rfl : x = 0, hy : 0 < y⟩
rw [← arg_I, ← arg_real_mul I hy, ofReal_mul', I_re, I_im, mul_zero, mul_one]
#align complex.arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff Complex.arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff
theorem arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = -(π / 2) ↔ z.re = 0 ∧ z.im < 0 := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0; · simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_ne_zero]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· cases' z with x y
rintro ⟨rfl : x = 0, hy : y < 0⟩
rw [← arg_neg_I, ← arg_real_mul (-I) (neg_pos.2 hy), mk_eq_add_mul_I]
simp
#align complex.arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff Complex.arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff
theorem arg_of_re_nonneg {x : ℂ} (hx : 0 ≤ x.re) : arg x = Real.arcsin (x.im / abs x) :=
if_pos hx
#align complex.arg_of_re_nonneg Complex.arg_of_re_nonneg
theorem arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg {x : ℂ} (hx_re : x.re < 0) (hx_im : 0 ≤ x.im) :
arg x = Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) + π := by
simp only [arg, hx_re.not_le, hx_im, if_true, if_false]
#align complex.arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg Complex.arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg
theorem arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg {x : ℂ} (hx_re : x.re < 0) (hx_im : x.im < 0) :
arg x = Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) - π := by
simp only [arg, hx_re.not_le, hx_im.not_le, if_false]
#align complex.arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg Complex.arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg
theorem arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero {z : ℂ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ z.im) (h₂ : z ≠ 0) :
arg z = Real.arccos (z.re / abs z) := by
rw [← cos_arg h₂, Real.arccos_cos (arg_nonneg_iff.2 h₁) (arg_le_pi _)]
#align complex.arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero Complex.arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero
theorem arg_of_im_pos {z : ℂ} (hz : 0 < z.im) : arg z = Real.arccos (z.re / abs z) :=
arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero hz.le fun h => hz.ne' <| h.symm ▸ rfl
#align complex.arg_of_im_pos Complex.arg_of_im_pos
theorem arg_of_im_neg {z : ℂ} (hz : z.im < 0) : arg z = -Real.arccos (z.re / abs z) := by
have h₀ : z ≠ 0 := mt (congr_arg im) hz.ne
rw [← cos_arg h₀, ← Real.cos_neg, Real.arccos_cos, neg_neg]
exacts [neg_nonneg.2 (arg_neg_iff.2 hz).le, neg_le.2 (neg_pi_lt_arg z).le]
#align complex.arg_of_im_neg Complex.arg_of_im_neg
theorem arg_conj (x : ℂ) : arg (conj x) = if arg x = π then π else -arg x := by
simp_rw [arg_eq_pi_iff, arg, neg_im, conj_im, conj_re, abs_conj, neg_div, neg_neg,
Real.arcsin_neg]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr) <;>
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi.le, hi.ne, not_le.2 hi, add_comm]
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi]
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi.ne.symm, hi.le, not_le.2 hi, sub_eq_neg_add]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hi.ne]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hr.le.not_lt]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hr.le.not_lt]
#align complex.arg_conj Complex.arg_conj
theorem arg_inv (x : ℂ) : arg x⁻¹ = if arg x = π then π else -arg x := by
rw [← arg_conj, inv_def, mul_comm]
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· exact arg_real_mul (conj x) (by simp [hx])
#align complex.arg_inv Complex.arg_inv
@[simp] lemma abs_arg_inv (x : ℂ) : |x⁻¹.arg| = |x.arg| := by rw [arg_inv]; split_ifs <;> simp [*]
-- TODO: Replace the next two lemmas by general facts about periodic functions
lemma abs_eq_one_iff' : abs x = 1 ↔ ∃ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π, exp (θ * I) = x := by
rw [abs_eq_one_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨θ, rfl⟩
refine ⟨toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ, ?_, ?_⟩
· convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ _
ring
· rw [eq_sub_of_add_eq $ toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul _ _ θ, ofReal_sub,
ofReal_zsmul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, exp_mul_I_periodic.sub_zsmul_eq]
· rintro ⟨θ, _, rfl⟩
exact ⟨θ, rfl⟩
lemma image_exp_Ioc_eq_sphere : (fun θ : ℝ ↦ exp (θ * I)) '' Set.Ioc (-π) π = sphere 0 1 := by
ext; simpa using abs_eq_one_iff'.symm
theorem arg_le_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z ≤ π / 2 ↔ 0 ≤ re z ∨ im z < 0 := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 (re z) with hre | hre
· simp only [hre, arg_of_re_nonneg hre, Real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two, true_or_iff]
simp only [hre.not_le, false_or_iff]
rcases le_or_lt 0 (im z) with him | him
· simp only [him.not_lt]
rw [iff_false_iff, not_le, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg hre him, ← sub_lt_iff_lt_add, half_sub,
Real.neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin, neg_im, neg_div, neg_lt_neg_iff, div_lt_one, ←
_root_.abs_of_nonneg him, abs_im_lt_abs]
exacts [hre.ne, abs.pos <| ne_of_apply_ne re hre.ne]
· simp only [him]
rw [iff_true_iff, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg hre him]
exact (sub_le_self _ Real.pi_pos.le).trans (Real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two _)
#align complex.arg_le_pi_div_two_iff Complex.arg_le_pi_div_two_iff
theorem neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff {z : ℂ} : -(π / 2) ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ re z ∨ 0 ≤ im z := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 (re z) with hre | hre
· simp only [hre, arg_of_re_nonneg hre, Real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin, true_or_iff]
simp only [hre.not_le, false_or_iff]
rcases le_or_lt 0 (im z) with him | him
· simp only [him]
rw [iff_true_iff, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg hre him]
exact (Real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _).trans (le_add_of_nonneg_right Real.pi_pos.le)
· simp only [him.not_le]
rw [iff_false_iff, not_le, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg hre him, sub_lt_iff_lt_add', ←
sub_eq_add_neg, sub_half, Real.arcsin_lt_pi_div_two, div_lt_one, neg_im, ← abs_of_neg him,
abs_im_lt_abs]
exacts [hre.ne, abs.pos <| ne_of_apply_ne re hre.ne]
#align complex.neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff Complex.neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff
lemma neg_pi_div_two_lt_arg_iff {z : ℂ} : -(π / 2) < arg z ↔ 0 < re z ∨ 0 ≤ im z := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff, ne_comm, Ne, arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff]
rcases lt_trichotomy z.re 0 with hre | hre | hre
· simp [hre.ne, hre.not_le, hre.not_lt]
· simp [hre]
· simp [hre, hre.le, hre.ne']
lemma arg_lt_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < π / 2 ↔ 0 < re z ∨ im z < 0 ∨ z = 0 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, arg_le_pi_div_two_iff, Ne, arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff]
rcases lt_trichotomy z.re 0 with hre | hre | hre
· have : z ≠ 0 := by simp [ext_iff, hre.ne]
simp [hre.ne, hre.not_le, hre.not_lt, this]
· have : z = 0 ↔ z.im = 0 := by simp [ext_iff, hre]
simp [hre, this, or_comm, le_iff_eq_or_lt]
· simp [hre, hre.le, hre.ne']
@[simp]
theorem abs_arg_le_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : |arg z| ≤ π / 2 ↔ 0 ≤ re z := by
rw [abs_le, arg_le_pi_div_two_iff, neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff, ← or_and_left, ← not_le,
and_not_self_iff, or_false_iff]
#align complex.abs_arg_le_pi_div_two_iff Complex.abs_arg_le_pi_div_two_iff
@[simp]
theorem abs_arg_lt_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : |arg z| < π / 2 ↔ 0 < re z ∨ z = 0 := by
rw [abs_lt, arg_lt_pi_div_two_iff, neg_pi_div_two_lt_arg_iff, ← or_and_left]
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with hz | hz
· simp [hz]
· simp_rw [hz, or_false, ← not_lt, not_and_self_iff, or_false]
@[simp]
theorem arg_conj_coe_angle (x : ℂ) : (arg (conj x) : Real.Angle) = -arg x := by
by_cases h : arg x = π <;> simp [arg_conj, h]
#align complex.arg_conj_coe_angle Complex.arg_conj_coe_angle
@[simp]
theorem arg_inv_coe_angle (x : ℂ) : (arg x⁻¹ : Real.Angle) = -arg x := by
by_cases h : arg x = π <;> simp [arg_inv, h]
#align complex.arg_inv_coe_angle Complex.arg_inv_coe_angle
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos {x : ℂ} (hi : 0 < x.im) : arg (-x) = arg x - π := by
rw [arg_of_im_pos hi, arg_of_im_neg (show (-x).im < 0 from Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hi)]
simp [neg_div, Real.arccos_neg]
#align complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos Complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg {x : ℂ} (hi : x.im < 0) : arg (-x) = arg x + π := by
rw [arg_of_im_neg hi, arg_of_im_pos (show 0 < (-x).im from Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hi)]
simp [neg_div, Real.arccos_neg, add_comm, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
#align complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg Complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_iff {x : ℂ} :
arg (-x) = arg x - π ↔ 0 < x.im ∨ x.im = 0 ∧ x.re < 0 := by
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· simp [hi, hi.ne, hi.not_lt, arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, ←
add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· rw [(ext rfl hi : x = x.re)]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_neg hr, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr).le]
simp [hr]
· simp [hr, hi, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hr.le, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hr)]
simp [hr.not_lt, ← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· simp [hi, arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos]
#align complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_iff Complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_iff
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_iff {x : ℂ} :
arg (-x) = arg x + π ↔ x.im < 0 ∨ x.im = 0 ∧ 0 < x.re := by
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· simp [hi, arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg]
· rw [(ext rfl hi : x = x.re)]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_neg hr, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr).le]
simp [hr.not_lt, ← two_mul, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· simp [hr, hi, Real.pi_ne_zero.symm]
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hr.le, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hr)]
simp [hr]
· simp [hi, hi.ne.symm, hi.not_lt, arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos, sub_eq_add_neg, ←
add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq, Real.pi_ne_zero]
#align complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_iff Complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_iff
theorem arg_neg_coe_angle {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : (arg (-x) : Real.Angle) = arg x + π := by
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· rw [arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg hi, Real.Angle.coe_add]
· rw [(ext rfl hi : x = x.re)]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_neg hr, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr).le, ←
Real.Angle.coe_add, ← two_mul, Real.Angle.coe_two_pi, Real.Angle.coe_zero]
· exact False.elim (hx (ext hr hi))
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hr.le, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hr),
Real.Angle.coe_zero, zero_add]
· rw [arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos hi, Real.Angle.coe_sub, Real.Angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi]
#align complex.arg_neg_coe_angle Complex.arg_neg_coe_angle
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_toIocMod {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (θ : ℝ) :
arg (r * (cos θ + sin θ * I)) = toIocMod Real.two_pi_pos (-π) θ := by
have hi : toIocMod Real.two_pi_pos (-π) θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ θ
ring
convert arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I hr hi using 3
simp [toIocMod, cos_sub_int_mul_two_pi, sin_sub_int_mul_two_pi]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_to_Ioc_mod Complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_toIocMod
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_toIocMod (θ : ℝ) :
arg (cos θ + sin θ * I) = toIocMod Real.two_pi_pos (-π) θ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_toIocMod zero_lt_one]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_to_Ioc_mod Complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_toIocMod
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (θ : ℝ) :
arg (r * (cos θ + sin θ * I)) - θ = 2 * π * ⌊(π - θ) / (2 * π)⌋ := by
rw [arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_toIocMod hr, toIocMod_sub_self, toIocDiv_eq_neg_floor,
zsmul_eq_mul]
ring_nf
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub Complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub (θ : ℝ) :
arg (cos θ + sin θ * I) - θ = 2 * π * ⌊(π - θ) / (2 * π)⌋ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub zero_lt_one]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub Complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (θ : Real.Angle) :
(arg (r * (Real.Angle.cos θ + Real.Angle.sin θ * I)) : Real.Angle) = θ := by
induction' θ using Real.Angle.induction_on with θ
rw [Real.Angle.cos_coe, Real.Angle.sin_coe, Real.Angle.angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use ⌊(π - θ) / (2 * π)⌋
exact mod_cast arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub hr θ
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle Complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle (θ : Real.Angle) :
(arg (Real.Angle.cos θ + Real.Angle.sin θ * I) : Real.Angle) = θ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle zero_lt_one]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle Complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle
theorem arg_mul_coe_angle {x y : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
(arg (x * y) : Real.Angle) = arg x + arg y := by
convert arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle (mul_pos (abs.pos hx) (abs.pos hy))
(arg x + arg y : Real.Angle) using
3
simp_rw [← Real.Angle.coe_add, Real.Angle.sin_coe, Real.Angle.cos_coe, ofReal_cos, ofReal_sin,
cos_add_sin_I, ofReal_add, add_mul, exp_add, ofReal_mul]
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm (exp _), ← mul_assoc (abs y : ℂ), abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I, mul_comm y, ←
mul_assoc, abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I]
#align complex.arg_mul_coe_angle Complex.arg_mul_coe_angle
theorem arg_div_coe_angle {x y : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
(arg (x / y) : Real.Angle) = arg x - arg y := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, arg_mul_coe_angle hx (inv_ne_zero hy), arg_inv_coe_angle, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align complex.arg_div_coe_angle Complex.arg_div_coe_angle
@[simp]
theorem arg_coe_angle_toReal_eq_arg (z : ℂ) : (arg z : Real.Angle).toReal = arg z := by
rw [Real.Angle.toReal_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc]
exact arg_mem_Ioc _
#align complex.arg_coe_angle_to_real_eq_arg Complex.arg_coe_angle_toReal_eq_arg
theorem arg_coe_angle_eq_iff_eq_toReal {z : ℂ} {θ : Real.Angle} :
(arg z : Real.Angle) = θ ↔ arg z = θ.toReal := by
rw [← Real.Angle.toReal_inj, arg_coe_angle_toReal_eq_arg]
#align complex.arg_coe_angle_eq_iff_eq_to_real Complex.arg_coe_angle_eq_iff_eq_toReal
@[simp]
theorem arg_coe_angle_eq_iff {x y : ℂ} : (arg x : Real.Angle) = arg y ↔ arg x = arg y := by
simp_rw [← Real.Angle.toReal_inj, arg_coe_angle_toReal_eq_arg]
#align complex.arg_coe_angle_eq_iff Complex.arg_coe_angle_eq_iff
lemma arg_mul_eq_add_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} (hx₀ : x ≠ 0) (hy₀ : y ≠ 0) :
(x * y).arg = x.arg + y.arg ↔ arg x + arg y ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
rw [← arg_coe_angle_toReal_eq_arg, arg_mul_coe_angle hx₀ hy₀, ← Real.Angle.coe_add,
Real.Angle.toReal_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc]
alias ⟨_, arg_mul⟩ := arg_mul_eq_add_arg_iff
section Continuity
theorem arg_eq_nhds_of_re_pos (hx : 0 < x.re) : arg =ᶠ[𝓝 x] fun x => Real.arcsin (x.im / abs x) :=
((continuous_re.tendsto _).eventually (lt_mem_nhds hx)).mono fun _ hy => arg_of_re_nonneg hy.le
#align complex.arg_eq_nhds_of_re_pos Complex.arg_eq_nhds_of_re_pos
theorem arg_eq_nhds_of_re_neg_of_im_pos (hx_re : x.re < 0) (hx_im : 0 < x.im) :
arg =ᶠ[𝓝 x] fun x => Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) + π := by
suffices h_forall_nhds : ∀ᶠ y : ℂ in 𝓝 x, y.re < 0 ∧ 0 < y.im from
h_forall_nhds.mono fun y hy => arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg hy.1 hy.2.le
refine IsOpen.eventually_mem ?_ (⟨hx_re, hx_im⟩ : x.re < 0 ∧ 0 < x.im)
exact
IsOpen.and (isOpen_lt continuous_re continuous_zero) (isOpen_lt continuous_zero continuous_im)
#align complex.arg_eq_nhds_of_re_neg_of_im_pos Complex.arg_eq_nhds_of_re_neg_of_im_pos
theorem arg_eq_nhds_of_re_neg_of_im_neg (hx_re : x.re < 0) (hx_im : x.im < 0) :
arg =ᶠ[𝓝 x] fun x => Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) - π := by
suffices h_forall_nhds : ∀ᶠ y : ℂ in 𝓝 x, y.re < 0 ∧ y.im < 0 from
h_forall_nhds.mono fun y hy => arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg hy.1 hy.2
refine IsOpen.eventually_mem ?_ (⟨hx_re, hx_im⟩ : x.re < 0 ∧ x.im < 0)
exact
IsOpen.and (isOpen_lt continuous_re continuous_zero) (isOpen_lt continuous_im continuous_zero)
#align complex.arg_eq_nhds_of_re_neg_of_im_neg Complex.arg_eq_nhds_of_re_neg_of_im_neg
theorem arg_eq_nhds_of_im_pos (hz : 0 < im z) : arg =ᶠ[𝓝 z] fun x => Real.arccos (x.re / abs x) :=
((continuous_im.tendsto _).eventually (lt_mem_nhds hz)).mono fun _ => arg_of_im_pos
#align complex.arg_eq_nhds_of_im_pos Complex.arg_eq_nhds_of_im_pos
theorem arg_eq_nhds_of_im_neg (hz : im z < 0) : arg =ᶠ[𝓝 z] fun x => -Real.arccos (x.re / abs x) :=
((continuous_im.tendsto _).eventually (gt_mem_nhds hz)).mono fun _ => arg_of_im_neg
#align complex.arg_eq_nhds_of_im_neg Complex.arg_eq_nhds_of_im_neg
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Arg.lean | 625 | 639 | theorem continuousAt_arg (h : x ∈ slitPlane) : ContinuousAt arg x := by |
have h₀ : abs x ≠ 0 := by
rw [abs.ne_zero_iff]
exact slitPlane_ne_zero h
rw [mem_slitPlane_iff, ← lt_or_lt_iff_ne] at h
rcases h with (hx_re | hx_im | hx_im)
exacts [(Real.continuousAt_arcsin.comp
(continuous_im.continuousAt.div continuous_abs.continuousAt h₀)).congr
(arg_eq_nhds_of_re_pos hx_re).symm,
(Real.continuous_arccos.continuousAt.comp
(continuous_re.continuousAt.div continuous_abs.continuousAt h₀)).neg.congr
(arg_eq_nhds_of_im_neg hx_im).symm,
(Real.continuous_arccos.continuousAt.comp
(continuous_re.continuousAt.div continuous_abs.continuousAt h₀)).congr
(arg_eq_nhds_of_im_pos hx_im).symm]
|
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Option
import Mathlib.Order.RelIso.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Disjoint
import Mathlib.Order.WithBot
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity.Attr
import Mathlib.Util.AssertExists
#align_import order.hom.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"62a5626868683c104774de8d85b9855234ac807c"
open OrderDual
variable {F α β γ δ : Type*}
structure OrderHom (α β : Type*) [Preorder α] [Preorder β] where
toFun : α → β
monotone' : Monotone toFun
#align order_hom OrderHom
infixr:25 " →o " => OrderHom
abbrev OrderEmbedding (α β : Type*) [LE α] [LE β] :=
@RelEmbedding α β (· ≤ ·) (· ≤ ·)
#align order_embedding OrderEmbedding
infixl:25 " ↪o " => OrderEmbedding
abbrev OrderIso (α β : Type*) [LE α] [LE β] :=
@RelIso α β (· ≤ ·) (· ≤ ·)
#align order_iso OrderIso
infixl:25 " ≃o " => OrderIso
section
abbrev OrderHomClass (F : Type*) (α β : outParam Type*) [LE α] [LE β] [FunLike F α β] :=
RelHomClass F ((· ≤ ·) : α → α → Prop) ((· ≤ ·) : β → β → Prop)
#align order_hom_class OrderHomClass
class OrderIsoClass (F α β : Type*) [LE α] [LE β] [EquivLike F α β] : Prop where
map_le_map_iff (f : F) {a b : α} : f a ≤ f b ↔ a ≤ b
#align order_iso_class OrderIsoClass
end
export OrderIsoClass (map_le_map_iff)
attribute [simp] map_le_map_iff
@[coe]
def OrderIsoClass.toOrderIso [LE α] [LE β] [EquivLike F α β] [OrderIsoClass F α β] (f : F) :
α ≃o β :=
{ EquivLike.toEquiv f with map_rel_iff' := map_le_map_iff f }
instance [LE α] [LE β] [EquivLike F α β] [OrderIsoClass F α β] : CoeTC F (α ≃o β) :=
⟨OrderIsoClass.toOrderIso⟩
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) OrderIsoClass.toOrderHomClass [LE α] [LE β]
[EquivLike F α β] [OrderIsoClass F α β] : OrderHomClass F α β :=
{ EquivLike.toEmbeddingLike (E := F) with
map_rel := fun f _ _ => (map_le_map_iff f).2 }
#align order_iso_class.to_order_hom_class OrderIsoClass.toOrderHomClass
section OrderIsoClass
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [EquivLike F α β] [OrderIsoClass F α β]
theorem map_lt_map_iff (f : F) {a b : α} : f a < f b ↔ a < b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le' (map_le_map_iff f) (map_le_map_iff f)
#align map_lt_map_iff map_lt_map_iff
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Hom/Basic.lean | 201 | 203 | theorem map_inv_lt_iff (f : F) {a : α} {b : β} : EquivLike.inv f b < a ↔ b < f a := by |
rw [← map_lt_map_iff f]
simp only [EquivLike.apply_inv_apply]
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.StrongRankCondition
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Projection
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.SesquilinearForm
import Mathlib.RingTheory.TensorProduct.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.LocalRing
#align_import linear_algebra.dual from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b1c017582e9f18d8494e5c18602a8cb4a6f843ac"
noncomputable section
namespace Module
-- Porting note: max u v universe issues so name and specific below
universe uR uA uM uM' uM''
variable (R : Type uR) (A : Type uA) (M : Type uM)
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
abbrev Dual :=
M →ₗ[R] R
#align module.dual Module.Dual
def dualPairing (R M) [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] :
Module.Dual R M →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] R :=
LinearMap.id
#align module.dual_pairing Module.dualPairing
@[simp]
theorem dualPairing_apply (v x) : dualPairing R M v x = v x :=
rfl
#align module.dual_pairing_apply Module.dualPairing_apply
namespace Dual
instance : Inhabited (Dual R M) := ⟨0⟩
def eval : M →ₗ[R] Dual R (Dual R M) :=
LinearMap.flip LinearMap.id
#align module.dual.eval Module.Dual.eval
@[simp]
theorem eval_apply (v : M) (a : Dual R M) : eval R M v a = a v :=
rfl
#align module.dual.eval_apply Module.Dual.eval_apply
variable {R M} {M' : Type uM'}
variable [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M']
def transpose : (M →ₗ[R] M') →ₗ[R] Dual R M' →ₗ[R] Dual R M :=
(LinearMap.llcomp R M M' R).flip
#align module.dual.transpose Module.Dual.transpose
-- Porting note: with reducible def need to specify some parameters to transpose explicitly
theorem transpose_apply (u : M →ₗ[R] M') (l : Dual R M') : transpose (R := R) u l = l.comp u :=
rfl
#align module.dual.transpose_apply Module.Dual.transpose_apply
variable {M'' : Type uM''} [AddCommMonoid M''] [Module R M'']
-- Porting note: with reducible def need to specify some parameters to transpose explicitly
theorem transpose_comp (u : M' →ₗ[R] M'') (v : M →ₗ[R] M') :
transpose (R := R) (u.comp v) = (transpose (R := R) v).comp (transpose (R := R) u) :=
rfl
#align module.dual.transpose_comp Module.Dual.transpose_comp
end Dual
section Prod
variable (M' : Type uM') [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M']
@[simps!]
def dualProdDualEquivDual : (Module.Dual R M × Module.Dual R M') ≃ₗ[R] Module.Dual R (M × M') :=
LinearMap.coprodEquiv R
#align module.dual_prod_dual_equiv_dual Module.dualProdDualEquivDual
@[simp]
theorem dualProdDualEquivDual_apply (φ : Module.Dual R M) (ψ : Module.Dual R M') :
dualProdDualEquivDual R M M' (φ, ψ) = φ.coprod ψ :=
rfl
#align module.dual_prod_dual_equiv_dual_apply Module.dualProdDualEquivDual_apply
end Prod
end Module
section DualMap
open Module
universe u v v'
variable {R : Type u} [CommSemiring R] {M₁ : Type v} {M₂ : Type v'}
variable [AddCommMonoid M₁] [Module R M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M₂]
def LinearMap.dualMap (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) : Dual R M₂ →ₗ[R] Dual R M₁ :=
-- Porting note: with reducible def need to specify some parameters to transpose explicitly
Module.Dual.transpose (R := R) f
#align linear_map.dual_map LinearMap.dualMap
lemma LinearMap.dualMap_eq_lcomp (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) : f.dualMap = f.lcomp R := rfl
-- Porting note: with reducible def need to specify some parameters to transpose explicitly
theorem LinearMap.dualMap_def (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) : f.dualMap = Module.Dual.transpose (R := R) f :=
rfl
#align linear_map.dual_map_def LinearMap.dualMap_def
theorem LinearMap.dualMap_apply' (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : Dual R M₂) : f.dualMap g = g.comp f :=
rfl
#align linear_map.dual_map_apply' LinearMap.dualMap_apply'
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.dualMap_apply (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : Dual R M₂) (x : M₁) :
f.dualMap g x = g (f x) :=
rfl
#align linear_map.dual_map_apply LinearMap.dualMap_apply
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Dual.lean | 215 | 217 | theorem LinearMap.dualMap_id : (LinearMap.id : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁).dualMap = LinearMap.id := by |
ext
rfl
|
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Jacobson
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.IsAlgClosed.Basic
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.MvPolynomial
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.PrimeSpectrum.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.nullstellensatz from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9556784a5b84697562e9c6acb40500d4a82e675a"
open Ideal
noncomputable section
namespace MvPolynomial
open MvPolynomial
variable {k : Type*} [Field k]
variable {σ : Type*}
def zeroLocus (I : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ k)) : Set (σ → k) :=
{x : σ → k | ∀ p ∈ I, eval x p = 0}
#align mv_polynomial.zero_locus MvPolynomial.zeroLocus
@[simp]
theorem mem_zeroLocus_iff {I : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ k)} {x : σ → k} :
x ∈ zeroLocus I ↔ ∀ p ∈ I, eval x p = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
#align mv_polynomial.mem_zero_locus_iff MvPolynomial.mem_zeroLocus_iff
theorem zeroLocus_anti_mono {I J : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ k)} (h : I ≤ J) :
zeroLocus J ≤ zeroLocus I := fun _ hx p hp => hx p <| h hp
#align mv_polynomial.zero_locus_anti_mono MvPolynomial.zeroLocus_anti_mono
@[simp]
theorem zeroLocus_bot : zeroLocus (⊥ : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ k)) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 fun x _ _ hp => Trans.trans (congr_arg (eval x) (mem_bot.1 hp)) (eval x).map_zero
#align mv_polynomial.zero_locus_bot MvPolynomial.zeroLocus_bot
@[simp]
theorem zeroLocus_top : zeroLocus (⊤ : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ k)) = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 fun x hx => one_ne_zero ((eval x).map_one ▸ hx 1 Submodule.mem_top : (1 : k) = 0)
#align mv_polynomial.zero_locus_top MvPolynomial.zeroLocus_top
def vanishingIdeal (V : Set (σ → k)) : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ k) where
carrier := {p | ∀ x ∈ V, eval x p = 0}
zero_mem' x _ := RingHom.map_zero _
add_mem' {p q} hp hq x hx := by simp only [hq x hx, hp x hx, add_zero, RingHom.map_add]
smul_mem' p q hq x hx := by
simp only [hq x hx, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, mul_zero, RingHom.map_mul]
#align mv_polynomial.vanishing_ideal MvPolynomial.vanishingIdeal
@[simp]
theorem mem_vanishingIdeal_iff {V : Set (σ → k)} {p : MvPolynomial σ k} :
p ∈ vanishingIdeal V ↔ ∀ x ∈ V, eval x p = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
#align mv_polynomial.mem_vanishing_ideal_iff MvPolynomial.mem_vanishingIdeal_iff
theorem vanishingIdeal_anti_mono {A B : Set (σ → k)} (h : A ≤ B) :
vanishingIdeal B ≤ vanishingIdeal A := fun _ hp x hx => hp x <| h hx
#align mv_polynomial.vanishing_ideal_anti_mono MvPolynomial.vanishingIdeal_anti_mono
theorem vanishingIdeal_empty : vanishingIdeal (∅ : Set (σ → k)) = ⊤ :=
le_antisymm le_top fun _ _ x hx => absurd hx (Set.not_mem_empty x)
#align mv_polynomial.vanishing_ideal_empty MvPolynomial.vanishingIdeal_empty
theorem le_vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus (I : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ k)) :
I ≤ vanishingIdeal (zeroLocus I) := fun p hp _ hx => hx p hp
#align mv_polynomial.le_vanishing_ideal_zero_locus MvPolynomial.le_vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus
theorem zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_le (V : Set (σ → k)) : V ≤ zeroLocus (vanishingIdeal V) :=
fun V hV _ hp => hp V hV
#align mv_polynomial.zero_locus_vanishing_ideal_le MvPolynomial.zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_le
theorem zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_galoisConnection :
@GaloisConnection (Ideal (MvPolynomial σ k)) (Set (σ → k))ᵒᵈ _ _ zeroLocus vanishingIdeal :=
GaloisConnection.monotone_intro (fun _ _ ↦ vanishingIdeal_anti_mono)
(fun _ _ ↦ zeroLocus_anti_mono) le_vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_le
#align mv_polynomial.zero_locus_vanishing_ideal_galois_connection MvPolynomial.zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_galoisConnection
theorem le_zeroLocus_iff_le_vanishingIdeal {V : Set (σ → k)} {I : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ k)} :
V ≤ zeroLocus I ↔ I ≤ vanishingIdeal V :=
zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_galoisConnection.le_iff_le
theorem zeroLocus_span (S : Set (MvPolynomial σ k)) :
zeroLocus (Ideal.span S) = { x | ∀ p ∈ S, eval x p = 0 } :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun _ => le_zeroLocus_iff_le_vanishingIdeal.trans <|
Ideal.span_le.trans forall₂_swap
theorem mem_vanishingIdeal_singleton_iff (x : σ → k) (p : MvPolynomial σ k) :
p ∈ (vanishingIdeal {x} : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ k)) ↔ eval x p = 0 :=
⟨fun h => h x rfl, fun hpx _ hy => hy.symm ▸ hpx⟩
#align mv_polynomial.mem_vanishing_ideal_singleton_iff MvPolynomial.mem_vanishingIdeal_singleton_iff
instance vanishingIdeal_singleton_isMaximal {x : σ → k} :
(vanishingIdeal {x} : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ k)).IsMaximal := by
have : MvPolynomial σ k ⧸ vanishingIdeal {x} ≃+* k :=
RingEquiv.ofBijective
(Ideal.Quotient.lift _ (eval x) fun p h => (mem_vanishingIdeal_singleton_iff x p).mp h)
(by
refine
⟨(injective_iff_map_eq_zero _).mpr fun p hp => ?_, fun z =>
⟨(Ideal.Quotient.mk (vanishingIdeal {x} : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ k))) (C z), by simp⟩⟩
obtain ⟨q, rfl⟩ := Quotient.mk_surjective p
rwa [Ideal.Quotient.lift_mk, ← mem_vanishingIdeal_singleton_iff,
← Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem] at hp)
rw [← bot_quotient_isMaximal_iff, RingEquiv.bot_maximal_iff this]
exact bot_isMaximal
#align mv_polynomial.vanishing_ideal_singleton_is_maximal MvPolynomial.vanishingIdeal_singleton_isMaximal
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Nullstellensatz.lean | 131 | 140 | theorem radical_le_vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus (I : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ k)) :
I.radical ≤ vanishingIdeal (zeroLocus I) := by |
intro p hp x hx
rw [← mem_vanishingIdeal_singleton_iff]
rw [radical_eq_sInf] at hp
refine
(mem_sInf.mp hp)
⟨le_trans (le_vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus I)
(vanishingIdeal_anti_mono fun y hy => hy.symm ▸ hx),
IsMaximal.isPrime' _⟩
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.MemPartition
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountableSeparatingOn
open Set MeasureTheory
namespace MeasurableSpace
variable {α β : Type*}
class CountablyGenerated (α : Type*) [m : MeasurableSpace α] : Prop where
isCountablyGenerated : ∃ b : Set (Set α), b.Countable ∧ m = generateFrom b
#align measurable_space.countably_generated MeasurableSpace.CountablyGenerated
def countableGeneratingSet (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] [h : CountablyGenerated α] :
Set (Set α) :=
insert ∅ h.isCountablyGenerated.choose
lemma countable_countableGeneratingSet [MeasurableSpace α] [h : CountablyGenerated α] :
Set.Countable (countableGeneratingSet α) :=
Countable.insert _ h.isCountablyGenerated.choose_spec.1
lemma generateFrom_countableGeneratingSet [m : MeasurableSpace α] [h : CountablyGenerated α] :
generateFrom (countableGeneratingSet α) = m :=
(generateFrom_insert_empty _).trans <| h.isCountablyGenerated.choose_spec.2.symm
lemma empty_mem_countableGeneratingSet [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α] :
∅ ∈ countableGeneratingSet α := mem_insert _ _
lemma nonempty_countableGeneratingSet [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α] :
Set.Nonempty (countableGeneratingSet α) :=
⟨∅, mem_insert _ _⟩
lemma measurableSet_countableGeneratingSet [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α]
{s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ countableGeneratingSet α) :
MeasurableSet s := by
rw [← generateFrom_countableGeneratingSet (α := α)]
exact measurableSet_generateFrom hs
def natGeneratingSequence (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α] : ℕ → (Set α) :=
enumerateCountable (countable_countableGeneratingSet (α := α)) ∅
lemma generateFrom_natGeneratingSequence (α : Type*) [m : MeasurableSpace α]
[CountablyGenerated α] : generateFrom (range (natGeneratingSequence _)) = m := by
rw [natGeneratingSequence, range_enumerateCountable_of_mem _ empty_mem_countableGeneratingSet,
generateFrom_countableGeneratingSet]
lemma measurableSet_natGeneratingSequence [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α] (n : ℕ) :
MeasurableSet (natGeneratingSequence α n) :=
measurableSet_countableGeneratingSet $ Set.enumerateCountable_mem _
empty_mem_countableGeneratingSet n
theorem CountablyGenerated.comap [m : MeasurableSpace β] [h : CountablyGenerated β] (f : α → β) :
@CountablyGenerated α (.comap f m) := by
rcases h with ⟨⟨b, hbc, rfl⟩⟩
rw [comap_generateFrom]
letI := generateFrom (preimage f '' b)
exact ⟨_, hbc.image _, rfl⟩
theorem CountablyGenerated.sup {m₁ m₂ : MeasurableSpace β} (h₁ : @CountablyGenerated β m₁)
(h₂ : @CountablyGenerated β m₂) : @CountablyGenerated β (m₁ ⊔ m₂) := by
rcases h₁ with ⟨⟨b₁, hb₁c, rfl⟩⟩
rcases h₂ with ⟨⟨b₂, hb₂c, rfl⟩⟩
exact @mk _ (_ ⊔ _) ⟨_, hb₁c.union hb₂c, generateFrom_sup_generateFrom⟩
instance (priority := 100) [MeasurableSpace α] [Countable α] : CountablyGenerated α where
isCountablyGenerated := by
refine ⟨⋃ y, {measurableAtom y}, countable_iUnion (fun i ↦ countable_singleton _), ?_⟩
refine le_antisymm ?_ (generateFrom_le (by simp [MeasurableSet.measurableAtom_of_countable]))
intro s hs
have : s = ⋃ y ∈ s, measurableAtom y := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· intro x hx
simpa using ⟨x, hx, by simp⟩
· simp only [iUnion_subset_iff]
intro x hx
exact measurableAtom_subset hs hx
rw [this]
apply MeasurableSet.biUnion (to_countable s) (fun x _hx ↦ ?_)
apply measurableSet_generateFrom
simp
instance [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α] {p : α → Prop} :
CountablyGenerated { x // p x } := .comap _
instance [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α] [MeasurableSpace β] [CountablyGenerated β] :
CountablyGenerated (α × β) :=
.sup (.comap Prod.fst) (.comap Prod.snd)
section SeparatesPoints
class SeparatesPoints (α : Type*) [m : MeasurableSpace α] : Prop where
separates : ∀ x y : α, (∀ s, MeasurableSet s → (x ∈ s → y ∈ s)) → x = y
theorem separatesPoints_def [MeasurableSpace α] [hs : SeparatesPoints α] {x y : α}
(h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → (x ∈ s → y ∈ s)) : x = y := hs.separates _ _ h
theorem exists_measurableSet_of_ne [MeasurableSpace α] [SeparatesPoints α] {x y : α}
(h : x ≠ y) : ∃ s, MeasurableSet s ∧ x ∈ s ∧ y ∉ s := by
contrapose! h
exact separatesPoints_def h
theorem separatesPoints_iff [MeasurableSpace α] : SeparatesPoints α ↔
∀ x y : α, (∀ s, MeasurableSet s → (x ∈ s ↔ y ∈ s)) → x = y :=
⟨fun h ↦ fun _ _ hxy ↦ h.separates _ _ fun _ hs xs ↦ (hxy _ hs).mp xs,
fun h ↦ ⟨fun _ _ hxy ↦ h _ _ fun _ hs ↦
⟨fun xs ↦ hxy _ hs xs, not_imp_not.mp fun xs ↦ hxy _ hs.compl xs⟩⟩⟩
theorem separating_of_generateFrom (S : Set (Set α))
[h : @SeparatesPoints α (generateFrom S)] :
∀ x y : α, (∀ s ∈ S, x ∈ s ↔ y ∈ s) → x = y := by
letI := generateFrom S
intros x y hxy
rw [← forall_generateFrom_mem_iff_mem_iff] at hxy
exact separatesPoints_def $ fun _ hs ↦ (hxy _ hs).mp
theorem SeparatesPoints.mono {m m' : MeasurableSpace α} [hsep : @SeparatesPoints _ m] (h : m ≤ m') :
@SeparatesPoints _ m' := @SeparatesPoints.mk _ m' fun _ _ hxy ↦
@SeparatesPoints.separates _ m hsep _ _ fun _ hs ↦ hxy _ (h _ hs)
class CountablySeparated (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] : Prop where
countably_separated : HasCountableSeparatingOn α MeasurableSet univ
instance countablySeparated_of_hasCountableSeparatingOn [MeasurableSpace α]
[h : HasCountableSeparatingOn α MeasurableSet univ] : CountablySeparated α := ⟨h⟩
instance hasCountableSeparatingOn_of_countablySeparated [MeasurableSpace α]
[h : CountablySeparated α] : HasCountableSeparatingOn α MeasurableSet univ :=
h.countably_separated
theorem countablySeparated_def [MeasurableSpace α] :
CountablySeparated α ↔ HasCountableSeparatingOn α MeasurableSet univ :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.countably_separated, fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩⟩
theorem CountablySeparated.mono {m m' : MeasurableSpace α} [hsep : @CountablySeparated _ m]
(h : m ≤ m') : @CountablySeparated _ m' := by
simp_rw [countablySeparated_def] at *
rcases hsep with ⟨S, Sct, Smeas, hS⟩
use S, Sct, (fun s hs ↦ h _ <| Smeas _ hs), hS
theorem CountablySeparated.subtype_iff [MeasurableSpace α] {s : Set α} :
CountablySeparated s ↔ HasCountableSeparatingOn α MeasurableSet s := by
rw [countablySeparated_def]
exact HasCountableSeparatingOn.subtype_iff
instance (priority := 100) Subtype.separatesPoints [MeasurableSpace α] [h : SeparatesPoints α]
{s : Set α} : SeparatesPoints s :=
⟨fun _ _ hxy ↦ Subtype.val_injective $ h.1 _ _ fun _ ht ↦ hxy _ $ measurable_subtype_coe ht⟩
instance (priority := 100) Subtype.countablySeparated [MeasurableSpace α]
[h : CountablySeparated α] {s : Set α} : CountablySeparated s := by
rw [CountablySeparated.subtype_iff]
exact h.countably_separated.mono (fun s ↦ id) $ subset_univ _
instance (priority := 100) separatesPoints_of_measurableSingletonClass [MeasurableSpace α]
[MeasurableSingletonClass α] : SeparatesPoints α := by
refine ⟨fun x y h ↦ ?_⟩
specialize h _ (MeasurableSet.singleton x)
simp_rw [mem_singleton_iff, forall_true_left] at h
exact h.symm
instance hasCountableSeparatingOn_of_countablySeparated_subtype
[MeasurableSpace α] {s : Set α} [h : CountablySeparated s] :
HasCountableSeparatingOn _ MeasurableSet s := CountablySeparated.subtype_iff.mp h
instance countablySeparated_subtype_of_hasCountableSeparatingOn
[MeasurableSpace α] {s : Set α} [h : HasCountableSeparatingOn _ MeasurableSet s] :
CountablySeparated s := CountablySeparated.subtype_iff.mpr h
instance countablySeparated_of_separatesPoints [MeasurableSpace α]
[h : CountablyGenerated α] [SeparatesPoints α] : CountablySeparated α := by
rcases h with ⟨b, hbc, hb⟩
refine ⟨⟨b, hbc, fun t ht ↦ hb.symm ▸ .basic t ht, ?_⟩⟩
rw [hb] at ‹SeparatesPoints _›
convert separating_of_generateFrom b
simp
variable (α)
theorem exists_countablyGenerated_le_of_countablySeparated [m : MeasurableSpace α]
[h : CountablySeparated α] :
∃ m' : MeasurableSpace α, @CountablyGenerated _ m' ∧ @SeparatesPoints _ m' ∧ m' ≤ m := by
rcases h with ⟨b, bct, hbm, hb⟩
refine ⟨generateFrom b, ?_, ?_, generateFrom_le hbm⟩
· use b
rw [@separatesPoints_iff]
exact fun x y hxy ↦ hb _ trivial _ trivial fun _ hs ↦ hxy _ $ measurableSet_generateFrom hs
open scoped Classical
open Function
noncomputable
def mapNatBool [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α] (x : α) (n : ℕ) :
Bool := x ∈ natGeneratingSequence α n
theorem measurable_mapNatBool [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α] :
Measurable (mapNatBool α) := by
rw [measurable_pi_iff]
refine fun n ↦ measurable_to_bool ?_
simp only [preimage, mem_singleton_iff, mapNatBool,
Bool.decide_iff, setOf_mem_eq]
apply measurableSet_natGeneratingSequence
theorem injective_mapNatBool [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α]
[SeparatesPoints α] : Injective (mapNatBool α) := by
intro x y hxy
rw [← generateFrom_natGeneratingSequence α] at *
apply separating_of_generateFrom (range (natGeneratingSequence _))
rintro - ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [← decide_eq_decide]
exact congr_fun hxy n
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/MeasurableSpace/CountablyGenerated.lean | 272 | 284 | theorem measurableEquiv_nat_bool_of_countablyGenerated [MeasurableSpace α]
[CountablyGenerated α] [SeparatesPoints α] :
∃ s : Set (ℕ → Bool), Nonempty (α ≃ᵐ s) := by |
use range (mapNatBool α), Equiv.ofInjective _ $
injective_mapNatBool _,
Measurable.subtype_mk $ measurable_mapNatBool _
simp_rw [← generateFrom_natGeneratingSequence α]
apply measurable_generateFrom
rintro _ ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [← Equiv.image_eq_preimage _ _]
refine ⟨{y | y n}, by measurability, ?_⟩
rw [← Equiv.preimage_eq_iff_eq_image]
simp [mapNatBool]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Roots
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.AsymptoticEquivalent
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.SpecificAsymptotics
#align_import analysis.special_functions.polynomials from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
open Filter Finset Asymptotics
open Asymptotics Polynomial Topology
namespace Polynomial
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedLinearOrderedField 𝕜] (P Q : 𝕜[X])
theorem eventually_no_roots (hP : P ≠ 0) : ∀ᶠ x in atTop, ¬P.IsRoot x :=
atTop_le_cofinite <| (finite_setOf_isRoot hP).compl_mem_cofinite
#align polynomial.eventually_no_roots Polynomial.eventually_no_roots
variable [OrderTopology 𝕜]
section PolynomialAtTop
theorem isEquivalent_atTop_lead :
(fun x => eval x P) ~[atTop] fun x => P.leadingCoeff * x ^ P.natDegree := by
by_cases h : P = 0
· simp [h, IsEquivalent.refl]
· simp only [Polynomial.eval_eq_sum_range, sum_range_succ]
exact
IsLittleO.add_isEquivalent
(IsLittleO.sum fun i hi =>
IsLittleO.const_mul_left
((IsLittleO.const_mul_right fun hz => h <| leadingCoeff_eq_zero.mp hz) <|
isLittleO_pow_pow_atTop_of_lt (mem_range.mp hi))
_)
IsEquivalent.refl
#align polynomial.is_equivalent_at_top_lead Polynomial.isEquivalent_atTop_lead
theorem tendsto_atTop_of_leadingCoeff_nonneg (hdeg : 0 < P.degree) (hnng : 0 ≤ P.leadingCoeff) :
Tendsto (fun x => eval x P) atTop atTop :=
P.isEquivalent_atTop_lead.symm.tendsto_atTop <|
tendsto_const_mul_pow_atTop (natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos.2 hdeg).ne' <|
hnng.lt_of_ne' <| leadingCoeff_ne_zero.mpr <| ne_zero_of_degree_gt hdeg
#align polynomial.tendsto_at_top_of_leading_coeff_nonneg Polynomial.tendsto_atTop_of_leadingCoeff_nonneg
theorem tendsto_atTop_iff_leadingCoeff_nonneg :
Tendsto (fun x => eval x P) atTop atTop ↔ 0 < P.degree ∧ 0 ≤ P.leadingCoeff := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => tendsto_atTop_of_leadingCoeff_nonneg P h.1 h.2⟩
have : Tendsto (fun x => P.leadingCoeff * x ^ P.natDegree) atTop atTop :=
(isEquivalent_atTop_lead P).tendsto_atTop h
rw [tendsto_const_mul_pow_atTop_iff, ← pos_iff_ne_zero, natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos] at this
exact ⟨this.1, this.2.le⟩
#align polynomial.tendsto_at_top_iff_leading_coeff_nonneg Polynomial.tendsto_atTop_iff_leadingCoeff_nonneg
theorem tendsto_atBot_iff_leadingCoeff_nonpos :
Tendsto (fun x => eval x P) atTop atBot ↔ 0 < P.degree ∧ P.leadingCoeff ≤ 0 := by
simp only [← tendsto_neg_atTop_iff, ← eval_neg, tendsto_atTop_iff_leadingCoeff_nonneg,
degree_neg, leadingCoeff_neg, neg_nonneg]
#align polynomial.tendsto_at_bot_iff_leading_coeff_nonpos Polynomial.tendsto_atBot_iff_leadingCoeff_nonpos
theorem tendsto_atBot_of_leadingCoeff_nonpos (hdeg : 0 < P.degree) (hnps : P.leadingCoeff ≤ 0) :
Tendsto (fun x => eval x P) atTop atBot :=
P.tendsto_atBot_iff_leadingCoeff_nonpos.2 ⟨hdeg, hnps⟩
#align polynomial.tendsto_at_bot_of_leading_coeff_nonpos Polynomial.tendsto_atBot_of_leadingCoeff_nonpos
theorem abs_tendsto_atTop (hdeg : 0 < P.degree) :
Tendsto (fun x => abs <| eval x P) atTop atTop := by
rcases le_total 0 P.leadingCoeff with hP | hP
· exact tendsto_abs_atTop_atTop.comp (P.tendsto_atTop_of_leadingCoeff_nonneg hdeg hP)
· exact tendsto_abs_atBot_atTop.comp (P.tendsto_atBot_of_leadingCoeff_nonpos hdeg hP)
#align polynomial.abs_tendsto_at_top Polynomial.abs_tendsto_atTop
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Polynomials.lean | 91 | 97 | theorem abs_isBoundedUnder_iff :
(IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) atTop fun x => |eval x P|) ↔ P.degree ≤ 0 := by |
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ⟨|P.coeff 0|, eventually_map.mpr (eventually_of_forall
(forall_imp (fun _ => le_of_eq) fun x => congr_arg abs <| _root_.trans (congr_arg (eval x)
(eq_C_of_degree_le_zero h)) eval_C))⟩⟩
contrapose! h
exact not_isBoundedUnder_of_tendsto_atTop (abs_tendsto_atTop P h)
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.AEMeasurable
#align_import measure_theory.group.arithmetic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a75898643b2d774cced9ae7c0b28c21663b99666"
open MeasureTheory
open scoped Pointwise
universe u v
variable {α : Type*}
class MeasurableAdd (M : Type*) [MeasurableSpace M] [Add M] : Prop where
measurable_const_add : ∀ c : M, Measurable (c + ·)
measurable_add_const : ∀ c : M, Measurable (· + c)
#align has_measurable_add MeasurableAdd
#align has_measurable_add.measurable_const_add MeasurableAdd.measurable_const_add
#align has_measurable_add.measurable_add_const MeasurableAdd.measurable_add_const
export MeasurableAdd (measurable_const_add measurable_add_const)
class MeasurableAdd₂ (M : Type*) [MeasurableSpace M] [Add M] : Prop where
measurable_add : Measurable fun p : M × M => p.1 + p.2
#align has_measurable_add₂ MeasurableAdd₂
export MeasurableAdd₂ (measurable_add)
@[to_additive]
class MeasurableMul (M : Type*) [MeasurableSpace M] [Mul M] : Prop where
measurable_const_mul : ∀ c : M, Measurable (c * ·)
measurable_mul_const : ∀ c : M, Measurable (· * c)
#align has_measurable_mul MeasurableMul
#align has_measurable_mul.measurable_const_mul MeasurableMul.measurable_const_mul
#align has_measurable_mul.measurable_mul_const MeasurableMul.measurable_mul_const
export MeasurableMul (measurable_const_mul measurable_mul_const)
@[to_additive MeasurableAdd₂]
class MeasurableMul₂ (M : Type*) [MeasurableSpace M] [Mul M] : Prop where
measurable_mul : Measurable fun p : M × M => p.1 * p.2
#align has_measurable_mul₂ MeasurableMul₂
#align has_measurable_mul₂.measurable_mul MeasurableMul₂.measurable_mul
export MeasurableMul₂ (measurable_mul)
@[to_additive " A version of `measurable_sub_const` that assumes `MeasurableAdd` instead of
`MeasurableSub`. This can be nice to avoid unnecessary type-class assumptions. "]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Group/Arithmetic.lean | 188 | 189 | theorem measurable_div_const' {G : Type*} [DivInvMonoid G] [MeasurableSpace G] [MeasurableMul G]
(g : G) : Measurable fun h => h / g := by | simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, measurable_mul_const]
|
import Batteries.Data.List.Basic
import Batteries.Data.List.Lemmas
open Nat
namespace List
section countP
variable (p q : α → Bool)
@[simp] theorem countP_nil : countP p [] = 0 := rfl
protected theorem countP_go_eq_add (l) : countP.go p l n = n + countP.go p l 0 := by
induction l generalizing n with
| nil => rfl
| cons head tail ih =>
unfold countP.go
rw [ih (n := n + 1), ih (n := n), ih (n := 1)]
if h : p head then simp [h, Nat.add_assoc] else simp [h]
@[simp] theorem countP_cons_of_pos (l) (pa : p a) : countP p (a :: l) = countP p l + 1 := by
have : countP.go p (a :: l) 0 = countP.go p l 1 := show cond .. = _ by rw [pa]; rfl
unfold countP
rw [this, Nat.add_comm, List.countP_go_eq_add]
@[simp] theorem countP_cons_of_neg (l) (pa : ¬p a) : countP p (a :: l) = countP p l := by
simp [countP, countP.go, pa]
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/List/Count.lean | 44 | 45 | theorem countP_cons (a : α) (l) : countP p (a :: l) = countP p l + if p a then 1 else 0 := by |
by_cases h : p a <;> simp [h]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bits
import Mathlib.Order.Lattice
#align_import data.nat.size from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"18a5306c091183ac90884daa9373fa3b178e8607"
namespace Nat
section
set_option linter.deprecated false
theorem shiftLeft_eq_mul_pow (m) : ∀ n, m <<< n = m * 2 ^ n := shiftLeft_eq _
#align nat.shiftl_eq_mul_pow Nat.shiftLeft_eq_mul_pow
theorem shiftLeft'_tt_eq_mul_pow (m) : ∀ n, shiftLeft' true m n + 1 = (m + 1) * 2 ^ n
| 0 => by simp [shiftLeft', pow_zero, Nat.one_mul]
| k + 1 => by
change bit1 (shiftLeft' true m k) + 1 = (m + 1) * (2 ^ k * 2)
rw [bit1_val]
change 2 * (shiftLeft' true m k + 1) = _
rw [shiftLeft'_tt_eq_mul_pow m k, mul_left_comm, mul_comm 2]
#align nat.shiftl'_tt_eq_mul_pow Nat.shiftLeft'_tt_eq_mul_pow
end
#align nat.one_shiftl Nat.one_shiftLeft
#align nat.zero_shiftl Nat.zero_shiftLeft
#align nat.shiftr_eq_div_pow Nat.shiftRight_eq_div_pow
theorem shiftLeft'_ne_zero_left (b) {m} (h : m ≠ 0) (n) : shiftLeft' b m n ≠ 0 := by
induction n <;> simp [bit_ne_zero, shiftLeft', *]
#align nat.shiftl'_ne_zero_left Nat.shiftLeft'_ne_zero_left
theorem shiftLeft'_tt_ne_zero (m) : ∀ {n}, (n ≠ 0) → shiftLeft' true m n ≠ 0
| 0, h => absurd rfl h
| succ _, _ => Nat.bit1_ne_zero _
#align nat.shiftl'_tt_ne_zero Nat.shiftLeft'_tt_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem size_zero : size 0 = 0 := by simp [size]
#align nat.size_zero Nat.size_zero
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Size.lean | 55 | 61 | theorem size_bit {b n} (h : bit b n ≠ 0) : size (bit b n) = succ (size n) := by |
rw [size]
conv =>
lhs
rw [binaryRec]
simp [h]
rw [div2_bit]
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.NatIso
#align_import category_theory.bicategory.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4c19a16e4b705bf135cf9a80ac18fcc99c438514"
namespace CategoryTheory
universe w v u
open Category Iso
-- intended to be used with explicit universe parameters
@[nolint checkUnivs]
class Bicategory (B : Type u) extends CategoryStruct.{v} B where
-- category structure on the collection of 1-morphisms:
homCategory : ∀ a b : B, Category.{w} (a ⟶ b) := by infer_instance
-- left whiskering:
whiskerLeft {a b c : B} (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) : f ≫ g ⟶ f ≫ h
-- right whiskering:
whiskerRight {a b c : B} {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (h : b ⟶ c) : f ≫ h ⟶ g ≫ h
-- associator:
associator {a b c d : B} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) : (f ≫ g) ≫ h ≅ f ≫ g ≫ h
-- left unitor:
leftUnitor {a b : B} (f : a ⟶ b) : 𝟙 a ≫ f ≅ f
-- right unitor:
rightUnitor {a b : B} (f : a ⟶ b) : f ≫ 𝟙 b ≅ f
-- axioms for left whiskering:
whiskerLeft_id : ∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c), whiskerLeft f (𝟙 g) = 𝟙 (f ≫ g) := by
aesop_cat
whiskerLeft_comp :
∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) {g h i : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) (θ : h ⟶ i),
whiskerLeft f (η ≫ θ) = whiskerLeft f η ≫ whiskerLeft f θ := by
aesop_cat
id_whiskerLeft :
∀ {a b} {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g),
whiskerLeft (𝟙 a) η = (leftUnitor f).hom ≫ η ≫ (leftUnitor g).inv := by
aesop_cat
comp_whiskerLeft :
∀ {a b c d} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) {h h' : c ⟶ d} (η : h ⟶ h'),
whiskerLeft (f ≫ g) η =
(associator f g h).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (whiskerLeft g η) ≫ (associator f g h').inv := by
aesop_cat
-- axioms for right whiskering:
id_whiskerRight : ∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c), whiskerRight (𝟙 f) g = 𝟙 (f ≫ g) := by
aesop_cat
comp_whiskerRight :
∀ {a b c} {f g h : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (θ : g ⟶ h) (i : b ⟶ c),
whiskerRight (η ≫ θ) i = whiskerRight η i ≫ whiskerRight θ i := by
aesop_cat
whiskerRight_id :
∀ {a b} {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g),
whiskerRight η (𝟙 b) = (rightUnitor f).hom ≫ η ≫ (rightUnitor g).inv := by
aesop_cat
whiskerRight_comp :
∀ {a b c d} {f f' : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ f') (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d),
whiskerRight η (g ≫ h) =
(associator f g h).inv ≫ whiskerRight (whiskerRight η g) h ≫ (associator f' g h).hom := by
aesop_cat
-- associativity of whiskerings:
whisker_assoc :
∀ {a b c d} (f : a ⟶ b) {g g' : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ g') (h : c ⟶ d),
whiskerRight (whiskerLeft f η) h =
(associator f g h).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (whiskerRight η h) ≫ (associator f g' h).inv := by
aesop_cat
-- exchange law of left and right whiskerings:
whisker_exchange :
∀ {a b c} {f g : a ⟶ b} {h i : b ⟶ c} (η : f ⟶ g) (θ : h ⟶ i),
whiskerLeft f θ ≫ whiskerRight η i = whiskerRight η h ≫ whiskerLeft g θ := by
aesop_cat
-- pentagon identity:
pentagon :
∀ {a b c d e} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e),
whiskerRight (associator f g h).hom i ≫
(associator f (g ≫ h) i).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (associator g h i).hom =
(associator (f ≫ g) h i).hom ≫ (associator f g (h ≫ i)).hom := by
aesop_cat
-- triangle identity:
triangle :
∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c),
(associator f (𝟙 b) g).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (leftUnitor g).hom
= whiskerRight (rightUnitor f).hom g := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.bicategory CategoryTheory.Bicategory
#align category_theory.bicategory.hom_category CategoryTheory.Bicategory.homCategory
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight
#align category_theory.bicategory.left_unitor CategoryTheory.Bicategory.leftUnitor
#align category_theory.bicategory.right_unitor CategoryTheory.Bicategory.rightUnitor
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left_id' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_id
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left_comp' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_comp
#align category_theory.bicategory.id_whisker_left' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.id_whiskerLeft
#align category_theory.bicategory.comp_whisker_left' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.comp_whiskerLeft
#align category_theory.bicategory.id_whisker_right' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.id_whiskerRight
#align category_theory.bicategory.comp_whisker_right' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.comp_whiskerRight
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right_id' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight_id
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right_comp' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight_comp
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_assoc' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whisker_assoc
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_exchange' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whisker_exchange
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon
#align category_theory.bicategory.triangle' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.triangle
namespace Bicategory
scoped infixr:81 " ◁ " => Bicategory.whiskerLeft
scoped infixl:81 " ▷ " => Bicategory.whiskerRight
scoped notation "α_" => Bicategory.associator
scoped notation "λ_" => Bicategory.leftUnitor
scoped notation "ρ_" => Bicategory.rightUnitor
attribute [instance] homCategory
attribute [reassoc]
whiskerLeft_comp id_whiskerLeft comp_whiskerLeft comp_whiskerRight whiskerRight_id
whiskerRight_comp whisker_assoc whisker_exchange
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] pentagon triangle
attribute [simp]
whiskerLeft_id whiskerLeft_comp id_whiskerLeft comp_whiskerLeft id_whiskerRight comp_whiskerRight
whiskerRight_id whiskerRight_comp whisker_assoc
variable {B : Type u} [Bicategory.{w, v} B] {a b c d e : B}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_hom_inv (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ≅ h) :
f ◁ η.hom ≫ f ◁ η.inv = 𝟙 (f ≫ g) := by rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, hom_inv_id, whiskerLeft_id]
#align category_theory.bicategory.hom_inv_whisker_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_hom_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem hom_inv_whiskerRight {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ≅ g) (h : b ⟶ c) :
η.hom ▷ h ≫ η.inv ▷ h = 𝟙 (f ≫ h) := by rw [← comp_whiskerRight, hom_inv_id, id_whiskerRight]
#align category_theory.bicategory.hom_inv_whisker_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.hom_inv_whiskerRight
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_inv_hom (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ≅ h) :
f ◁ η.inv ≫ f ◁ η.hom = 𝟙 (f ≫ h) := by rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, inv_hom_id, whiskerLeft_id]
#align category_theory.bicategory.inv_hom_whisker_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_inv_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_hom_whiskerRight {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ≅ g) (h : b ⟶ c) :
η.inv ▷ h ≫ η.hom ▷ h = 𝟙 (g ≫ h) := by rw [← comp_whiskerRight, inv_hom_id, id_whiskerRight]
#align category_theory.bicategory.inv_hom_whisker_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.inv_hom_whiskerRight
@[simps]
def whiskerLeftIso (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ≅ h) : f ≫ g ≅ f ≫ h where
hom := f ◁ η.hom
inv := f ◁ η.inv
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left_iso CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeftIso
instance whiskerLeft_isIso (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) [IsIso η] : IsIso (f ◁ η) :=
(whiskerLeftIso f (asIso η)).isIso_hom
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left_is_iso CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_isIso
@[simp]
theorem inv_whiskerLeft (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) [IsIso η] :
inv (f ◁ η) = f ◁ inv η := by
apply IsIso.inv_eq_of_hom_inv_id
simp only [← whiskerLeft_comp, whiskerLeft_id, IsIso.hom_inv_id]
#align category_theory.bicategory.inv_whisker_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.inv_whiskerLeft
@[simps!]
def whiskerRightIso {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ≅ g) (h : b ⟶ c) : f ≫ h ≅ g ≫ h where
hom := η.hom ▷ h
inv := η.inv ▷ h
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right_iso CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRightIso
instance whiskerRight_isIso {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (h : b ⟶ c) [IsIso η] : IsIso (η ▷ h) :=
(whiskerRightIso (asIso η) h).isIso_hom
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right_is_iso CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight_isIso
@[simp]
theorem inv_whiskerRight {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (h : b ⟶ c) [IsIso η] :
inv (η ▷ h) = inv η ▷ h := by
apply IsIso.inv_eq_of_hom_inv_id
simp only [← comp_whiskerRight, id_whiskerRight, IsIso.hom_inv_id]
#align category_theory.bicategory.inv_whisker_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.inv_whiskerRight
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).inv ▷ i =
(α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_inv_hom_hom_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).inv ▷ i ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).hom =
f ◁ (α_ g h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv := by
rw [← cancel_epi (f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv), ← cancel_mono (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv]
simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_inv_inv_hom_hom_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_inv_inv_hom_hom_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).hom ▷ i ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).hom =
(α_ f g (h ≫ i)).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
f ◁ (α_ g h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv =
(α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).inv ▷ i := by
simp [← cancel_epi (f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv)]
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_hom_inv_hom_hom (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ (f ≫ g) h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv =
(α_ f g h).hom ▷ i ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_hom_hom_inv_hom_hom CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_hom_hom_inv_hom_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_hom (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f g (h ≫ i)).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv =
(α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).hom ▷ i := by
rw [← cancel_epi (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv, ← cancel_mono ((α_ f g h).inv ▷ i)]
simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_hom CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_hom_inv_inv_hom (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f (g ≫ h) i).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv =
(α_ f g h).inv ▷ i ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_hom_hom_inv_inv_hom CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_hom_hom_inv_inv_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_hom (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f g h).inv ▷ i ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).hom =
(α_ f (g ≫ h) i).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).hom := by
simp [← cancel_epi ((α_ f g h).hom ▷ i)]
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_hom CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_inv_hom_inv_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).hom ▷ i =
f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_inv_inv_hom_inv_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_inv_inv_hom_inv_inv
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_left (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(α_ f (𝟙 b) g).hom ≫ f ◁ (λ_ g).hom = (ρ_ f).hom ▷ g :=
triangle f g
#align category_theory.bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_left
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_right (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(α_ f (𝟙 b) g).inv ≫ (ρ_ f).hom ▷ g = f ◁ (λ_ g).hom := by rw [← triangle, inv_hom_id_assoc]
#align category_theory.bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_right
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_right_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(ρ_ f).inv ▷ g ≫ (α_ f (𝟙 b) g).hom = f ◁ (λ_ g).inv := by
simp [← cancel_mono (f ◁ (λ_ g).hom)]
#align category_theory.bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_right_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_right_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Bicategory/Basic.lean | 333 | 335 | theorem triangle_assoc_comp_left_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
f ◁ (λ_ g).inv ≫ (α_ f (𝟙 b) g).inv = (ρ_ f).inv ▷ g := by |
simp [← cancel_mono ((ρ_ f).hom ▷ g)]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Complex
import Qq
#align_import analysis.special_functions.pow.real from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4fa54b337f7d52805480306db1b1439c741848c8"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Real ComplexConjugate
open Finset Set
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ}
noncomputable def rpow (x y : ℝ) :=
((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re
#align real.rpow Real.rpow
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ ℝ := ⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y := rfl
#align real.rpow_eq_pow Real.rpow_eq_pow
theorem rpow_def (x y : ℝ) : x ^ y = ((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re := rfl
#align real.rpow_def Real.rpow_def
theorem rpow_def_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ y = if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y) := by
simp only [rpow_def, Complex.cpow_def]; split_ifs <;>
simp_all [(Complex.ofReal_log hx).symm, -Complex.ofReal_mul, -RCLike.ofReal_mul,
(Complex.ofReal_mul _ _).symm, Complex.exp_ofReal_re, Complex.ofReal_eq_zero]
#align real.rpow_def_of_nonneg Real.rpow_def_of_nonneg
theorem rpow_def_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) := by
rw [rpow_def_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hx), if_neg (ne_of_gt hx)]
#align real.rpow_def_of_pos Real.rpow_def_of_pos
theorem exp_mul (x y : ℝ) : exp (x * y) = exp x ^ y := by rw [rpow_def_of_pos (exp_pos _), log_exp]
#align real.exp_mul Real.exp_mul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_intCast (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by
simp only [rpow_def, ← Complex.ofReal_zpow, Complex.cpow_intCast, Complex.ofReal_intCast,
Complex.ofReal_re]
#align real.rpow_int_cast Real.rpow_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias rpow_int_cast := rpow_intCast
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_natCast (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by simpa using rpow_intCast x n
#align real.rpow_nat_cast Real.rpow_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias rpow_nat_cast := rpow_natCast
@[simp]
theorem exp_one_rpow (x : ℝ) : exp 1 ^ x = exp x := by rw [← exp_mul, one_mul]
#align real.exp_one_rpow Real.exp_one_rpow
@[simp] lemma exp_one_pow (n : ℕ) : exp 1 ^ n = exp n := by rw [← rpow_natCast, exp_one_rpow]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg (hx : 0 ≤ x) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]
split_ifs <;> simp [*, exp_ne_zero]
#align real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg Real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg
@[simp]
lemma rpow_eq_zero (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
simp [rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg, *]
@[simp]
lemma rpow_ne_zero (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
Real.rpow_eq_zero hx hy |>.not
open Real
theorem rpow_def_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) := by
rw [rpow_def, Complex.cpow_def, if_neg]
· have : Complex.log x * y = ↑(log (-x) * y) + ↑(y * π) * Complex.I := by
simp only [Complex.log, abs_of_neg hx, Complex.arg_ofReal_of_neg hx, Complex.abs_ofReal,
Complex.ofReal_mul]
ring
rw [this, Complex.exp_add_mul_I, ← Complex.ofReal_exp, ← Complex.ofReal_cos, ←
Complex.ofReal_sin, mul_add, ← Complex.ofReal_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← Complex.ofReal_mul,
Complex.add_re, Complex.ofReal_re, Complex.mul_re, Complex.I_re, Complex.ofReal_im,
Real.log_neg_eq_log]
ring
· rw [Complex.ofReal_eq_zero]
exact ne_of_lt hx
#align real.rpow_def_of_neg Real.rpow_def_of_neg
theorem rpow_def_of_nonpos {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ y = if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) := by
split_ifs with h <;> simp [rpow_def, *]; exact rpow_def_of_neg (lt_of_le_of_ne hx h) _
#align real.rpow_def_of_nonpos Real.rpow_def_of_nonpos
theorem rpow_pos_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : 0 < x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx]; apply exp_pos
#align real.rpow_pos_of_pos Real.rpow_pos_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero (x : ℝ) : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 := by simp [rpow_def]
#align real.rpow_zero Real.rpow_zero
theorem rpow_zero_pos (x : ℝ) : 0 < x ^ (0 : ℝ) := by simp
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℝ) ^ x = 0 := by simp [rpow_def, *]
#align real.zero_rpow Real.zero_rpow
theorem zero_rpow_eq_iff {x : ℝ} {a : ℝ} : 0 ^ x = a ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
constructor
· intro hyp
simp only [rpow_def, Complex.ofReal_zero] at hyp
by_cases h : x = 0
· subst h
simp only [Complex.one_re, Complex.ofReal_zero, Complex.cpow_zero] at hyp
exact Or.inr ⟨rfl, hyp.symm⟩
· rw [Complex.zero_cpow (Complex.ofReal_ne_zero.mpr h)] at hyp
exact Or.inl ⟨h, hyp.symm⟩
· rintro (⟨h, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· exact zero_rpow h
· exact rpow_zero _
#align real.zero_rpow_eq_iff Real.zero_rpow_eq_iff
theorem eq_zero_rpow_iff {x : ℝ} {a : ℝ} : a = 0 ^ x ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
rw [← zero_rpow_eq_iff, eq_comm]
#align real.eq_zero_rpow_iff Real.eq_zero_rpow_iff
@[simp]
theorem rpow_one (x : ℝ) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x := by simp [rpow_def]
#align real.rpow_one Real.rpow_one
@[simp]
theorem one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ) ^ x = 1 := by simp [rpow_def]
#align real.one_rpow Real.one_rpow
theorem zero_rpow_le_one (x : ℝ) : (0 : ℝ) ^ x ≤ 1 := by
by_cases h : x = 0 <;> simp [h, zero_le_one]
#align real.zero_rpow_le_one Real.zero_rpow_le_one
theorem zero_rpow_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ (0 : ℝ) ^ x := by
by_cases h : x = 0 <;> simp [h, zero_le_one]
#align real.zero_rpow_nonneg Real.zero_rpow_nonneg
theorem rpow_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : 0 ≤ x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]; split_ifs <;>
simp only [zero_le_one, le_refl, le_of_lt (exp_pos _)]
#align real.rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg Real.rpow_nonneg
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/Real.lean | 174 | 176 | theorem abs_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x) : |x ^ y| = |x| ^ y := by |
have h_rpow_nonneg : 0 ≤ x ^ y := Real.rpow_nonneg hx_nonneg _
rw [abs_eq_self.mpr hx_nonneg, abs_eq_self.mpr h_rpow_nonneg]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Part
import Mathlib.Data.Rel
#align_import data.pfun from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"207cfac9fcd06138865b5d04f7091e46d9320432"
open Function
def PFun (α β : Type*) :=
α → Part β
#align pfun PFun
infixr:25 " →. " => PFun
namespace PFun
variable {α β γ δ ε ι : Type*}
instance inhabited : Inhabited (α →. β) :=
⟨fun _ => Part.none⟩
#align pfun.inhabited PFun.inhabited
def Dom (f : α →. β) : Set α :=
{ a | (f a).Dom }
#align pfun.dom PFun.Dom
@[simp]
theorem mem_dom (f : α →. β) (x : α) : x ∈ Dom f ↔ ∃ y, y ∈ f x := by simp [Dom, Part.dom_iff_mem]
#align pfun.mem_dom PFun.mem_dom
@[simp]
theorem dom_mk (p : α → Prop) (f : ∀ a, p a → β) : (PFun.Dom fun x => ⟨p x, f x⟩) = { x | p x } :=
rfl
#align pfun.dom_mk PFun.dom_mk
theorem dom_eq (f : α →. β) : Dom f = { x | ∃ y, y ∈ f x } :=
Set.ext (mem_dom f)
#align pfun.dom_eq PFun.dom_eq
def fn (f : α →. β) (a : α) : Dom f a → β :=
(f a).get
#align pfun.fn PFun.fn
@[simp]
theorem fn_apply (f : α →. β) (a : α) : f.fn a = (f a).get :=
rfl
#align pfun.fn_apply PFun.fn_apply
def evalOpt (f : α →. β) [D : DecidablePred (· ∈ Dom f)] (x : α) : Option β :=
@Part.toOption _ _ (D x)
#align pfun.eval_opt PFun.evalOpt
theorem ext' {f g : α →. β} (H1 : ∀ a, a ∈ Dom f ↔ a ∈ Dom g) (H2 : ∀ a p q, f.fn a p = g.fn a q) :
f = g :=
funext fun a => Part.ext' (H1 a) (H2 a)
#align pfun.ext' PFun.ext'
theorem ext {f g : α →. β} (H : ∀ a b, b ∈ f a ↔ b ∈ g a) : f = g :=
funext fun a => Part.ext (H a)
#align pfun.ext PFun.ext
def asSubtype (f : α →. β) (s : f.Dom) : β :=
f.fn s s.2
#align pfun.as_subtype PFun.asSubtype
def equivSubtype : (α →. β) ≃ Σp : α → Prop, Subtype p → β :=
⟨fun f => ⟨fun a => (f a).Dom, asSubtype f⟩, fun f x => ⟨f.1 x, fun h => f.2 ⟨x, h⟩⟩, fun f =>
funext fun a => Part.eta _, fun ⟨p, f⟩ => by dsimp; congr⟩
#align pfun.equiv_subtype PFun.equivSubtype
theorem asSubtype_eq_of_mem {f : α →. β} {x : α} {y : β} (fxy : y ∈ f x) (domx : x ∈ f.Dom) :
f.asSubtype ⟨x, domx⟩ = y :=
Part.mem_unique (Part.get_mem _) fxy
#align pfun.as_subtype_eq_of_mem PFun.asSubtype_eq_of_mem
@[coe]
protected def lift (f : α → β) : α →. β := fun a => Part.some (f a)
#align pfun.lift PFun.lift
instance coe : Coe (α → β) (α →. β) :=
⟨PFun.lift⟩
#align pfun.has_coe PFun.coe
@[simp]
theorem coe_val (f : α → β) (a : α) : (f : α →. β) a = Part.some (f a) :=
rfl
#align pfun.coe_val PFun.coe_val
@[simp]
theorem dom_coe (f : α → β) : (f : α →. β).Dom = Set.univ :=
rfl
#align pfun.dom_coe PFun.dom_coe
theorem lift_injective : Injective (PFun.lift : (α → β) → α →. β) := fun _ _ h =>
funext fun a => Part.some_injective <| congr_fun h a
#align pfun.coe_injective PFun.lift_injective
def graph (f : α →. β) : Set (α × β) :=
{ p | p.2 ∈ f p.1 }
#align pfun.graph PFun.graph
def graph' (f : α →. β) : Rel α β := fun x y => y ∈ f x
#align pfun.graph' PFun.graph'
def ran (f : α →. β) : Set β :=
{ b | ∃ a, b ∈ f a }
#align pfun.ran PFun.ran
def restrict (f : α →. β) {p : Set α} (H : p ⊆ f.Dom) : α →. β := fun x =>
(f x).restrict (x ∈ p) (@H x)
#align pfun.restrict PFun.restrict
@[simp]
theorem mem_restrict {f : α →. β} {s : Set α} (h : s ⊆ f.Dom) (a : α) (b : β) :
b ∈ f.restrict h a ↔ a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ f a := by simp [restrict]
#align pfun.mem_restrict PFun.mem_restrict
def res (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : α →. β :=
(PFun.lift f).restrict s.subset_univ
#align pfun.res PFun.res
theorem mem_res (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (a : α) (b : β) : b ∈ res f s a ↔ a ∈ s ∧ f a = b := by
simp [res, @eq_comm _ b]
#align pfun.mem_res PFun.mem_res
theorem res_univ (f : α → β) : PFun.res f Set.univ = f :=
rfl
#align pfun.res_univ PFun.res_univ
theorem dom_iff_graph (f : α →. β) (x : α) : x ∈ f.Dom ↔ ∃ y, (x, y) ∈ f.graph :=
Part.dom_iff_mem
#align pfun.dom_iff_graph PFun.dom_iff_graph
theorem lift_graph {f : α → β} {a b} : (a, b) ∈ (f : α →. β).graph ↔ f a = b :=
show (∃ _ : True, f a = b) ↔ f a = b by simp
#align pfun.lift_graph PFun.lift_graph
protected def pure (x : β) : α →. β := fun _ => Part.some x
#align pfun.pure PFun.pure
def bind (f : α →. β) (g : β → α →. γ) : α →. γ := fun a => (f a).bind fun b => g b a
#align pfun.bind PFun.bind
@[simp]
theorem bind_apply (f : α →. β) (g : β → α →. γ) (a : α) : f.bind g a = (f a).bind fun b => g b a :=
rfl
#align pfun.bind_apply PFun.bind_apply
def map (f : β → γ) (g : α →. β) : α →. γ := fun a => (g a).map f
#align pfun.map PFun.map
instance monad : Monad (PFun α) where
pure := PFun.pure
bind := PFun.bind
map := PFun.map
#align pfun.monad PFun.monad
instance lawfulMonad : LawfulMonad (PFun α) := LawfulMonad.mk'
(bind_pure_comp := fun f x => funext fun a => Part.bind_some_eq_map _ _)
(id_map := fun f => by funext a; dsimp [Functor.map, PFun.map]; cases f a; rfl)
(pure_bind := fun x f => funext fun a => Part.bind_some _ (f x))
(bind_assoc := fun f g k => funext fun a => (f a).bind_assoc (fun b => g b a) fun b => k b a)
#align pfun.is_lawful_monad PFun.lawfulMonad
theorem pure_defined (p : Set α) (x : β) : p ⊆ (@PFun.pure α _ x).Dom :=
p.subset_univ
#align pfun.pure_defined PFun.pure_defined
theorem bind_defined {α β γ} (p : Set α) {f : α →. β} {g : β → α →. γ} (H1 : p ⊆ f.Dom)
(H2 : ∀ x, p ⊆ (g x).Dom) : p ⊆ (f >>= g).Dom := fun a ha =>
(⟨H1 ha, H2 _ ha⟩ : (f >>= g).Dom a)
#align pfun.bind_defined PFun.bind_defined
def fix (f : α →. Sum β α) : α →. β := fun a =>
Part.assert (Acc (fun x y => Sum.inr x ∈ f y) a) fun h =>
WellFounded.fixF
(fun a IH =>
Part.assert (f a).Dom fun hf =>
match e : (f a).get hf with
| Sum.inl b => Part.some b
| Sum.inr a' => IH a' ⟨hf, e⟩)
a h
#align pfun.fix PFun.fix
theorem dom_of_mem_fix {f : α →. Sum β α} {a : α} {b : β} (h : b ∈ f.fix a) : (f a).Dom := by
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := Part.mem_assert_iff.1 h
rw [WellFounded.fixFEq] at h₂; exact h₂.fst.fst
#align pfun.dom_of_mem_fix PFun.dom_of_mem_fix
theorem mem_fix_iff {f : α →. Sum β α} {a : α} {b : β} :
b ∈ f.fix a ↔ Sum.inl b ∈ f a ∨ ∃ a', Sum.inr a' ∈ f a ∧ b ∈ f.fix a' :=
⟨fun h => by
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := Part.mem_assert_iff.1 h
rw [WellFounded.fixFEq] at h₂
simp only [Part.mem_assert_iff] at h₂
cases' h₂ with h₂ h₃
split at h₃
next e => simp only [Part.mem_some_iff] at h₃; subst b; exact Or.inl ⟨h₂, e⟩
next e => exact Or.inr ⟨_, ⟨_, e⟩, Part.mem_assert _ h₃⟩,
fun h => by
simp only [fix, Part.mem_assert_iff]
rcases h with (⟨h₁, h₂⟩ | ⟨a', h, h₃⟩)
· refine ⟨⟨_, fun y h' => ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· injection Part.mem_unique ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ h'
· rw [WellFounded.fixFEq]
-- Porting note: used to be simp [h₁, h₂]
apply Part.mem_assert h₁
split
next e =>
injection h₂.symm.trans e with h; simp [h]
next e =>
injection h₂.symm.trans e
· simp [fix] at h₃
cases' h₃ with h₃ h₄
refine ⟨⟨_, fun y h' => ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· injection Part.mem_unique h h' with e
exact e ▸ h₃
· cases' h with h₁ h₂
rw [WellFounded.fixFEq]
-- Porting note: used to be simp [h₁, h₂, h₄]
apply Part.mem_assert h₁
split
next e =>
injection h₂.symm.trans e
next e =>
injection h₂.symm.trans e; subst a'; exact h₄⟩
#align pfun.mem_fix_iff PFun.mem_fix_iff
theorem fix_stop {f : α →. Sum β α} {b : β} {a : α} (hb : Sum.inl b ∈ f a) : b ∈ f.fix a := by
rw [PFun.mem_fix_iff]
exact Or.inl hb
#align pfun.fix_stop PFun.fix_stop
theorem fix_fwd_eq {f : α →. Sum β α} {a a' : α} (ha' : Sum.inr a' ∈ f a) : f.fix a = f.fix a' := by
ext b; constructor
· intro h
obtain h' | ⟨a, h', e'⟩ := mem_fix_iff.1 h <;> cases Part.mem_unique ha' h'
exact e'
· intro h
rw [PFun.mem_fix_iff]
exact Or.inr ⟨a', ha', h⟩
#align pfun.fix_fwd_eq PFun.fix_fwd_eq
theorem fix_fwd {f : α →. Sum β α} {b : β} {a a' : α} (hb : b ∈ f.fix a) (ha' : Sum.inr a' ∈ f a) :
b ∈ f.fix a' := by rwa [← fix_fwd_eq ha']
#align pfun.fix_fwd PFun.fix_fwd
@[elab_as_elim]
def fixInduction {C : α → Sort*} {f : α →. Sum β α} {b : β} {a : α} (h : b ∈ f.fix a)
(H : ∀ a', b ∈ f.fix a' → (∀ a'', Sum.inr a'' ∈ f a' → C a'') → C a') : C a := by
have h₂ := (Part.mem_assert_iff.1 h).snd
generalize_proofs at h₂
clear h
induction' ‹Acc _ _› with a ha IH
have h : b ∈ f.fix a := Part.mem_assert_iff.2 ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, h₂⟩
exact H a h fun a' fa' => IH a' fa' (Part.mem_assert_iff.1 (fix_fwd h fa')).snd
#align pfun.fix_induction PFun.fixInduction
theorem fixInduction_spec {C : α → Sort*} {f : α →. Sum β α} {b : β} {a : α} (h : b ∈ f.fix a)
(H : ∀ a', b ∈ f.fix a' → (∀ a'', Sum.inr a'' ∈ f a' → C a'') → C a') :
@fixInduction _ _ C _ _ _ h H = H a h fun a' h' => fixInduction (fix_fwd h h') H := by
unfold fixInduction
generalize_proofs
induction ‹Acc _ _›
rfl
#align pfun.fix_induction_spec PFun.fixInduction_spec
@[elab_as_elim]
def fixInduction' {C : α → Sort*} {f : α →. Sum β α} {b : β} {a : α}
(h : b ∈ f.fix a) (hbase : ∀ a_final : α, Sum.inl b ∈ f a_final → C a_final)
(hind : ∀ a₀ a₁ : α, b ∈ f.fix a₁ → Sum.inr a₁ ∈ f a₀ → C a₁ → C a₀) : C a := by
refine fixInduction h fun a' h ih => ?_
rcases e : (f a').get (dom_of_mem_fix h) with b' | a'' <;> replace e : _ ∈ f a' := ⟨_, e⟩
· apply hbase
convert e
exact Part.mem_unique h (fix_stop e)
· exact hind _ _ (fix_fwd h e) e (ih _ e)
#align pfun.fix_induction' PFun.fixInduction'
theorem fixInduction'_stop {C : α → Sort*} {f : α →. Sum β α} {b : β} {a : α} (h : b ∈ f.fix a)
(fa : Sum.inl b ∈ f a) (hbase : ∀ a_final : α, Sum.inl b ∈ f a_final → C a_final)
(hind : ∀ a₀ a₁ : α, b ∈ f.fix a₁ → Sum.inr a₁ ∈ f a₀ → C a₁ → C a₀) :
@fixInduction' _ _ C _ _ _ h hbase hind = hbase a fa := by
unfold fixInduction'
rw [fixInduction_spec]
-- Porting note: the explicit motive required because `simp` behaves differently
refine Eq.rec (motive := fun x e ↦
Sum.casesOn x ?_ ?_ (Eq.trans (Part.get_eq_of_mem fa (dom_of_mem_fix h)) e) = hbase a fa) ?_
(Part.get_eq_of_mem fa (dom_of_mem_fix h)).symm
simp
#align pfun.fix_induction'_stop PFun.fixInduction'_stop
theorem fixInduction'_fwd {C : α → Sort*} {f : α →. Sum β α} {b : β} {a a' : α} (h : b ∈ f.fix a)
(h' : b ∈ f.fix a') (fa : Sum.inr a' ∈ f a)
(hbase : ∀ a_final : α, Sum.inl b ∈ f a_final → C a_final)
(hind : ∀ a₀ a₁ : α, b ∈ f.fix a₁ → Sum.inr a₁ ∈ f a₀ → C a₁ → C a₀) :
@fixInduction' _ _ C _ _ _ h hbase hind = hind a a' h' fa (fixInduction' h' hbase hind) := by
unfold fixInduction'
rw [fixInduction_spec]
-- Porting note: the explicit motive required because `simp` behaves differently
refine Eq.rec (motive := fun x e =>
Sum.casesOn (motive := fun y => (f a).get (dom_of_mem_fix h) = y → C a) x ?_ ?_
(Eq.trans (Part.get_eq_of_mem fa (dom_of_mem_fix h)) e) = _) ?_
(Part.get_eq_of_mem fa (dom_of_mem_fix h)).symm
simp
#align pfun.fix_induction'_fwd PFun.fixInduction'_fwd
variable (f : α →. β)
def image (s : Set α) : Set β :=
f.graph'.image s
#align pfun.image PFun.image
theorem image_def (s : Set α) : f.image s = { y | ∃ x ∈ s, y ∈ f x } :=
rfl
#align pfun.image_def PFun.image_def
theorem mem_image (y : β) (s : Set α) : y ∈ f.image s ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, y ∈ f x :=
Iff.rfl
#align pfun.mem_image PFun.mem_image
theorem image_mono {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : f.image s ⊆ f.image t :=
Rel.image_mono _ h
#align pfun.image_mono PFun.image_mono
theorem image_inter (s t : Set α) : f.image (s ∩ t) ⊆ f.image s ∩ f.image t :=
Rel.image_inter _ s t
#align pfun.image_inter PFun.image_inter
theorem image_union (s t : Set α) : f.image (s ∪ t) = f.image s ∪ f.image t :=
Rel.image_union _ s t
#align pfun.image_union PFun.image_union
def preimage (s : Set β) : Set α :=
Rel.image (fun x y => x ∈ f y) s
#align pfun.preimage PFun.preimage
theorem Preimage_def (s : Set β) : f.preimage s = { x | ∃ y ∈ s, y ∈ f x } :=
rfl
#align pfun.preimage_def PFun.Preimage_def
@[simp]
theorem mem_preimage (s : Set β) (x : α) : x ∈ f.preimage s ↔ ∃ y ∈ s, y ∈ f x :=
Iff.rfl
#align pfun.mem_preimage PFun.mem_preimage
theorem preimage_subset_dom (s : Set β) : f.preimage s ⊆ f.Dom := fun _ ⟨y, _, fxy⟩ =>
Part.dom_iff_mem.mpr ⟨y, fxy⟩
#align pfun.preimage_subset_dom PFun.preimage_subset_dom
theorem preimage_mono {s t : Set β} (h : s ⊆ t) : f.preimage s ⊆ f.preimage t :=
Rel.preimage_mono _ h
#align pfun.preimage_mono PFun.preimage_mono
theorem preimage_inter (s t : Set β) : f.preimage (s ∩ t) ⊆ f.preimage s ∩ f.preimage t :=
Rel.preimage_inter _ s t
#align pfun.preimage_inter PFun.preimage_inter
theorem preimage_union (s t : Set β) : f.preimage (s ∪ t) = f.preimage s ∪ f.preimage t :=
Rel.preimage_union _ s t
#align pfun.preimage_union PFun.preimage_union
theorem preimage_univ : f.preimage Set.univ = f.Dom := by ext; simp [mem_preimage, mem_dom]
#align pfun.preimage_univ PFun.preimage_univ
theorem coe_preimage (f : α → β) (s : Set β) : (f : α →. β).preimage s = f ⁻¹' s := by ext; simp
#align pfun.coe_preimage PFun.coe_preimage
def core (s : Set β) : Set α :=
f.graph'.core s
#align pfun.core PFun.core
theorem core_def (s : Set β) : f.core s = { x | ∀ y, y ∈ f x → y ∈ s } :=
rfl
#align pfun.core_def PFun.core_def
@[simp]
theorem mem_core (x : α) (s : Set β) : x ∈ f.core s ↔ ∀ y, y ∈ f x → y ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align pfun.mem_core PFun.mem_core
theorem compl_dom_subset_core (s : Set β) : f.Domᶜ ⊆ f.core s := fun x hx y fxy =>
absurd ((mem_dom f x).mpr ⟨y, fxy⟩) hx
#align pfun.compl_dom_subset_core PFun.compl_dom_subset_core
theorem core_mono {s t : Set β} (h : s ⊆ t) : f.core s ⊆ f.core t :=
Rel.core_mono _ h
#align pfun.core_mono PFun.core_mono
theorem core_inter (s t : Set β) : f.core (s ∩ t) = f.core s ∩ f.core t :=
Rel.core_inter _ s t
#align pfun.core_inter PFun.core_inter
theorem mem_core_res (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (x : α) :
x ∈ (res f s).core t ↔ x ∈ s → f x ∈ t := by simp [mem_core, mem_res]
#align pfun.mem_core_res PFun.mem_core_res
section
open scoped Classical
theorem core_res (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : (res f s).core t = sᶜ ∪ f ⁻¹' t := by
ext x
rw [mem_core_res]
by_cases h : x ∈ s <;> simp [h]
#align pfun.core_res PFun.core_res
end
theorem core_restrict (f : α → β) (s : Set β) : (f : α →. β).core s = s.preimage f := by
ext x; simp [core_def]
#align pfun.core_restrict PFun.core_restrict
theorem preimage_subset_core (f : α →. β) (s : Set β) : f.preimage s ⊆ f.core s :=
fun _ ⟨y, ys, fxy⟩ y' fxy' =>
have : y = y' := Part.mem_unique fxy fxy'
this ▸ ys
#align pfun.preimage_subset_core PFun.preimage_subset_core
theorem preimage_eq (f : α →. β) (s : Set β) : f.preimage s = f.core s ∩ f.Dom :=
Set.eq_of_subset_of_subset (Set.subset_inter (f.preimage_subset_core s) (f.preimage_subset_dom s))
fun x ⟨xcore, xdom⟩ =>
let y := (f x).get xdom
have ys : y ∈ s := xcore _ (Part.get_mem _)
show x ∈ f.preimage s from ⟨(f x).get xdom, ys, Part.get_mem _⟩
#align pfun.preimage_eq PFun.preimage_eq
| Mathlib/Data/PFun.lean | 514 | 516 | theorem core_eq (f : α →. β) (s : Set β) : f.core s = f.preimage s ∪ f.Domᶜ := by |
rw [preimage_eq, Set.inter_union_distrib_right, Set.union_comm (Dom f), Set.compl_union_self,
Set.inter_univ, Set.union_eq_self_of_subset_right (f.compl_dom_subset_core s)]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.NatAntidiagonal
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin
#align_import data.fin.tuple.nat_antidiagonal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"98e83c3d541c77cdb7da20d79611a780ff8e7d90"
namespace List.Nat
def antidiagonalTuple : ∀ k, ℕ → List (Fin k → ℕ)
| 0, 0 => [![]]
| 0, _ + 1 => []
| k + 1, n =>
(List.Nat.antidiagonal n).bind fun ni =>
(antidiagonalTuple k ni.2).map fun x => Fin.cons ni.1 x
#align list.nat.antidiagonal_tuple List.Nat.antidiagonalTuple
@[simp]
theorem antidiagonalTuple_zero_zero : antidiagonalTuple 0 0 = [![]] :=
rfl
#align list.nat.antidiagonal_tuple_zero_zero List.Nat.antidiagonalTuple_zero_zero
@[simp]
theorem antidiagonalTuple_zero_succ (n : ℕ) : antidiagonalTuple 0 (n + 1) = [] :=
rfl
#align list.nat.antidiagonal_tuple_zero_succ List.Nat.antidiagonalTuple_zero_succ
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/Tuple/NatAntidiagonal.lean | 79 | 92 | theorem mem_antidiagonalTuple {n : ℕ} {k : ℕ} {x : Fin k → ℕ} :
x ∈ antidiagonalTuple k n ↔ ∑ i, x i = n := by |
induction x using Fin.consInduction generalizing n with
| h0 =>
cases n
· decide
· simp [eq_comm]
| h x₀ x ih =>
simp_rw [Fin.sum_cons]
rw [antidiagonalTuple] -- Porting note: simp_rw doesn't use the equation lemma properly
simp_rw [List.mem_bind, List.mem_map,
List.Nat.mem_antidiagonal, Fin.cons_eq_cons, exists_eq_right_right, ih,
@eq_comm _ _ (Prod.snd _), and_comm (a := Prod.snd _ = _),
← Prod.mk.inj_iff (a₁ := Prod.fst _), exists_eq_right]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Definitions
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Induction
#align_import data.polynomial.eval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"728baa2f54e6062c5879a3e397ac6bac323e506f"
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
noncomputable section
open Finset AddMonoidAlgebra
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w y
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {ι : Type y} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
section
variable [Semiring S]
variable (f : R →+* S) (x : S)
irreducible_def eval₂ (p : R[X]) : S :=
p.sum fun e a => f a * x ^ e
#align polynomial.eval₂ Polynomial.eval₂
theorem eval₂_eq_sum {f : R →+* S} {x : S} : p.eval₂ f x = p.sum fun e a => f a * x ^ e := by
rw [eval₂_def]
#align polynomial.eval₂_eq_sum Polynomial.eval₂_eq_sum
theorem eval₂_congr {R S : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] {f g : R →+* S} {s t : S}
{φ ψ : R[X]} : f = g → s = t → φ = ψ → eval₂ f s φ = eval₂ g t ψ := by
rintro rfl rfl rfl; rfl
#align polynomial.eval₂_congr Polynomial.eval₂_congr
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_at_zero : p.eval₂ f 0 = f (coeff p 0) := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [eval₂_eq_sum, zero_pow_eq, mul_ite, mul_zero,
mul_one, sum, Classical.not_not, mem_support_iff, sum_ite_eq', ite_eq_left_iff,
RingHom.map_zero, imp_true_iff, eq_self_iff_true]
#align polynomial.eval₂_at_zero Polynomial.eval₂_at_zero
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_zero : (0 : R[X]).eval₂ f x = 0 := by simp [eval₂_eq_sum]
#align polynomial.eval₂_zero Polynomial.eval₂_zero
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_C : (C a).eval₂ f x = f a := by simp [eval₂_eq_sum]
#align polynomial.eval₂_C Polynomial.eval₂_C
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_X : X.eval₂ f x = x := by simp [eval₂_eq_sum]
#align polynomial.eval₂_X Polynomial.eval₂_X
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_monomial {n : ℕ} {r : R} : (monomial n r).eval₂ f x = f r * x ^ n := by
simp [eval₂_eq_sum]
#align polynomial.eval₂_monomial Polynomial.eval₂_monomial
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_X_pow {n : ℕ} : (X ^ n).eval₂ f x = x ^ n := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial]
convert eval₂_monomial f x (n := n) (r := 1)
simp
#align polynomial.eval₂_X_pow Polynomial.eval₂_X_pow
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Eval.lean | 89 | 91 | theorem eval₂_add : (p + q).eval₂ f x = p.eval₂ f x + q.eval₂ f x := by |
simp only [eval₂_eq_sum]
apply sum_add_index <;> simp [add_mul]
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.FullyFaithful
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.FullSubcategory
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Whiskering
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EssentialImage
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Slice
#align_import category_theory.equivalence from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9aba7801eeecebb61f58a5763c2b6dd1b47dc6ef"
namespace CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Functor NatIso Category
-- declare the `v`'s first; see `CategoryTheory.Category` for an explanation
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
@[ext]
structure Equivalence (C : Type u₁) (D : Type u₂) [Category.{v₁} C] [Category.{v₂} D] where mk' ::
functor : C ⥤ D
inverse : D ⥤ C
unitIso : 𝟭 C ≅ functor ⋙ inverse
counitIso : inverse ⋙ functor ≅ 𝟭 D
functor_unitIso_comp :
∀ X : C, functor.map (unitIso.hom.app X) ≫ counitIso.hom.app (functor.obj X) =
𝟙 (functor.obj X) := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.equivalence CategoryTheory.Equivalence
#align category_theory.equivalence.unit_iso CategoryTheory.Equivalence.unitIso
#align category_theory.equivalence.counit_iso CategoryTheory.Equivalence.counitIso
#align category_theory.equivalence.functor_unit_iso_comp CategoryTheory.Equivalence.functor_unitIso_comp
infixr:10 " ≌ " => Equivalence
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
namespace Equivalence
abbrev unit (e : C ≌ D) : 𝟭 C ⟶ e.functor ⋙ e.inverse :=
e.unitIso.hom
#align category_theory.equivalence.unit CategoryTheory.Equivalence.unit
abbrev counit (e : C ≌ D) : e.inverse ⋙ e.functor ⟶ 𝟭 D :=
e.counitIso.hom
#align category_theory.equivalence.counit CategoryTheory.Equivalence.counit
abbrev unitInv (e : C ≌ D) : e.functor ⋙ e.inverse ⟶ 𝟭 C :=
e.unitIso.inv
#align category_theory.equivalence.unit_inv CategoryTheory.Equivalence.unitInv
abbrev counitInv (e : C ≌ D) : 𝟭 D ⟶ e.inverse ⋙ e.functor :=
e.counitIso.inv
#align category_theory.equivalence.counit_inv CategoryTheory.Equivalence.counitInv
@[simp]
theorem Equivalence_mk'_unit (functor inverse unit_iso counit_iso f) :
(⟨functor, inverse, unit_iso, counit_iso, f⟩ : C ≌ D).unit = unit_iso.hom :=
rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.equivalence_mk'_unit CategoryTheory.Equivalence.Equivalence_mk'_unit
@[simp]
theorem Equivalence_mk'_counit (functor inverse unit_iso counit_iso f) :
(⟨functor, inverse, unit_iso, counit_iso, f⟩ : C ≌ D).counit = counit_iso.hom :=
rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.equivalence_mk'_counit CategoryTheory.Equivalence.Equivalence_mk'_counit
@[simp]
theorem Equivalence_mk'_unitInv (functor inverse unit_iso counit_iso f) :
(⟨functor, inverse, unit_iso, counit_iso, f⟩ : C ≌ D).unitInv = unit_iso.inv :=
rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.equivalence_mk'_unit_inv CategoryTheory.Equivalence.Equivalence_mk'_unitInv
@[simp]
theorem Equivalence_mk'_counitInv (functor inverse unit_iso counit_iso f) :
(⟨functor, inverse, unit_iso, counit_iso, f⟩ : C ≌ D).counitInv = counit_iso.inv :=
rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.equivalence_mk'_counit_inv CategoryTheory.Equivalence.Equivalence_mk'_counitInv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem functor_unit_comp (e : C ≌ D) (X : C) :
e.functor.map (e.unit.app X) ≫ e.counit.app (e.functor.obj X) = 𝟙 (e.functor.obj X) :=
e.functor_unitIso_comp X
#align category_theory.equivalence.functor_unit_comp CategoryTheory.Equivalence.functor_unit_comp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem counitInv_functor_comp (e : C ≌ D) (X : C) :
e.counitInv.app (e.functor.obj X) ≫ e.functor.map (e.unitInv.app X) = 𝟙 (e.functor.obj X) := by
erw [Iso.inv_eq_inv (e.functor.mapIso (e.unitIso.app X) ≪≫ e.counitIso.app (e.functor.obj X))
(Iso.refl _)]
exact e.functor_unit_comp X
#align category_theory.equivalence.counit_inv_functor_comp CategoryTheory.Equivalence.counitInv_functor_comp
theorem counitInv_app_functor (e : C ≌ D) (X : C) :
e.counitInv.app (e.functor.obj X) = e.functor.map (e.unit.app X) := by
symm
erw [← Iso.comp_hom_eq_id (e.counitIso.app _), functor_unit_comp]
rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.counit_inv_app_functor CategoryTheory.Equivalence.counitInv_app_functor
theorem counit_app_functor (e : C ≌ D) (X : C) :
e.counit.app (e.functor.obj X) = e.functor.map (e.unitInv.app X) := by
erw [← Iso.hom_comp_eq_id (e.functor.mapIso (e.unitIso.app X)), functor_unit_comp]
rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.counit_app_functor CategoryTheory.Equivalence.counit_app_functor
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem unit_inverse_comp (e : C ≌ D) (Y : D) :
e.unit.app (e.inverse.obj Y) ≫ e.inverse.map (e.counit.app Y) = 𝟙 (e.inverse.obj Y) := by
rw [← id_comp (e.inverse.map _), ← map_id e.inverse, ← counitInv_functor_comp, map_comp]
dsimp
rw [← Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc (e.unitIso.app _) (e.inverse.map (e.functor.map _)), app_hom, app_inv]
slice_lhs 2 3 => erw [e.unit.naturality]
slice_lhs 1 2 => erw [e.unit.naturality]
slice_lhs 4 4 =>
rw [← Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc (e.inverse.mapIso (e.counitIso.app _)) (e.unitInv.app _)]
slice_lhs 3 4 =>
erw [← map_comp e.inverse, e.counit.naturality]
erw [(e.counitIso.app _).hom_inv_id, map_id]
erw [id_comp]
slice_lhs 2 3 => erw [← map_comp e.inverse, e.counitIso.inv.naturality, map_comp]
slice_lhs 3 4 => erw [e.unitInv.naturality]
slice_lhs 4 5 => erw [← map_comp (e.functor ⋙ e.inverse), (e.unitIso.app _).hom_inv_id, map_id]
erw [id_comp]
slice_lhs 3 4 => erw [← e.unitInv.naturality]
slice_lhs 2 3 =>
erw [← map_comp e.inverse, ← e.counitIso.inv.naturality, (e.counitIso.app _).hom_inv_id,
map_id]
erw [id_comp, (e.unitIso.app _).hom_inv_id]; rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.unit_inverse_comp CategoryTheory.Equivalence.unit_inverse_comp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inverse_counitInv_comp (e : C ≌ D) (Y : D) :
e.inverse.map (e.counitInv.app Y) ≫ e.unitInv.app (e.inverse.obj Y) = 𝟙 (e.inverse.obj Y) := by
erw [Iso.inv_eq_inv (e.unitIso.app (e.inverse.obj Y) ≪≫ e.inverse.mapIso (e.counitIso.app Y))
(Iso.refl _)]
exact e.unit_inverse_comp Y
#align category_theory.equivalence.inverse_counit_inv_comp CategoryTheory.Equivalence.inverse_counitInv_comp
theorem unit_app_inverse (e : C ≌ D) (Y : D) :
e.unit.app (e.inverse.obj Y) = e.inverse.map (e.counitInv.app Y) := by
erw [← Iso.comp_hom_eq_id (e.inverse.mapIso (e.counitIso.app Y)), unit_inverse_comp]
dsimp
#align category_theory.equivalence.unit_app_inverse CategoryTheory.Equivalence.unit_app_inverse
theorem unitInv_app_inverse (e : C ≌ D) (Y : D) :
e.unitInv.app (e.inverse.obj Y) = e.inverse.map (e.counit.app Y) := by
symm
erw [← Iso.hom_comp_eq_id (e.unitIso.app _), unit_inverse_comp]
rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.unit_inv_app_inverse CategoryTheory.Equivalence.unitInv_app_inverse
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem fun_inv_map (e : C ≌ D) (X Y : D) (f : X ⟶ Y) :
e.functor.map (e.inverse.map f) = e.counit.app X ≫ f ≫ e.counitInv.app Y :=
(NatIso.naturality_2 e.counitIso f).symm
#align category_theory.equivalence.fun_inv_map CategoryTheory.Equivalence.fun_inv_map
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem inv_fun_map (e : C ≌ D) (X Y : C) (f : X ⟶ Y) :
e.inverse.map (e.functor.map f) = e.unitInv.app X ≫ f ≫ e.unit.app Y :=
(NatIso.naturality_1 e.unitIso f).symm
#align category_theory.equivalence.inv_fun_map CategoryTheory.Equivalence.inv_fun_map
section
-- In this section we convert an arbitrary equivalence to a half-adjoint equivalence.
variable {F : C ⥤ D} {G : D ⥤ C} (η : 𝟭 C ≅ F ⋙ G) (ε : G ⋙ F ≅ 𝟭 D)
def adjointifyη : 𝟭 C ≅ F ⋙ G := by
calc
𝟭 C ≅ F ⋙ G := η
_ ≅ F ⋙ 𝟭 D ⋙ G := isoWhiskerLeft F (leftUnitor G).symm
_ ≅ F ⋙ (G ⋙ F) ⋙ G := isoWhiskerLeft F (isoWhiskerRight ε.symm G)
_ ≅ F ⋙ G ⋙ F ⋙ G := isoWhiskerLeft F (associator G F G)
_ ≅ (F ⋙ G) ⋙ F ⋙ G := (associator F G (F ⋙ G)).symm
_ ≅ 𝟭 C ⋙ F ⋙ G := isoWhiskerRight η.symm (F ⋙ G)
_ ≅ F ⋙ G := leftUnitor (F ⋙ G)
#align category_theory.equivalence.adjointify_η CategoryTheory.Equivalence.adjointifyη
@[reassoc]
theorem adjointify_η_ε (X : C) :
F.map ((adjointifyη η ε).hom.app X) ≫ ε.hom.app (F.obj X) = 𝟙 (F.obj X) := by
dsimp [adjointifyη,Trans.trans]
simp only [comp_id, assoc, map_comp]
have := ε.hom.naturality (F.map (η.inv.app X)); dsimp at this; rw [this]; clear this
rw [← assoc _ _ (F.map _)]
have := ε.hom.naturality (ε.inv.app <| F.obj X); dsimp at this; rw [this]; clear this
have := (ε.app <| F.obj X).hom_inv_id; dsimp at this; rw [this]; clear this
rw [id_comp]; have := (F.mapIso <| η.app X).hom_inv_id; dsimp at this; rw [this]
#align category_theory.equivalence.adjointify_η_ε CategoryTheory.Equivalence.adjointify_η_ε
end
protected def mk (F : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ C) (η : 𝟭 C ≅ F ⋙ G) (ε : G ⋙ F ≅ 𝟭 D) : C ≌ D :=
⟨F, G, adjointifyη η ε, ε, adjointify_η_ε η ε⟩
#align category_theory.equivalence.mk CategoryTheory.Equivalence.mk
@[refl, simps]
def refl : C ≌ C :=
⟨𝟭 C, 𝟭 C, Iso.refl _, Iso.refl _, fun _ => Category.id_comp _⟩
#align category_theory.equivalence.refl CategoryTheory.Equivalence.refl
instance : Inhabited (C ≌ C) :=
⟨refl⟩
@[symm, simps]
def symm (e : C ≌ D) : D ≌ C :=
⟨e.inverse, e.functor, e.counitIso.symm, e.unitIso.symm, e.inverse_counitInv_comp⟩
#align category_theory.equivalence.symm CategoryTheory.Equivalence.symm
variable {E : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} E]
@[trans, simps]
def trans (e : C ≌ D) (f : D ≌ E) : C ≌ E where
functor := e.functor ⋙ f.functor
inverse := f.inverse ⋙ e.inverse
unitIso := by
refine Iso.trans e.unitIso ?_
exact isoWhiskerLeft e.functor (isoWhiskerRight f.unitIso e.inverse)
counitIso := by
refine Iso.trans ?_ f.counitIso
exact isoWhiskerLeft f.inverse (isoWhiskerRight e.counitIso f.functor)
-- We wouldn't have needed to give this proof if we'd used `Equivalence.mk`,
-- but we choose to avoid using that here, for the sake of good structure projection `simp`
-- lemmas.
functor_unitIso_comp X := by
dsimp
rw [← f.functor.map_comp_assoc, e.functor.map_comp, ← counitInv_app_functor, fun_inv_map,
Iso.inv_hom_id_app_assoc, assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id_app, counit_app_functor, ← Functor.map_comp]
erw [comp_id, Iso.hom_inv_id_app, Functor.map_id]
#align category_theory.equivalence.trans CategoryTheory.Equivalence.trans
def funInvIdAssoc (e : C ≌ D) (F : C ⥤ E) : e.functor ⋙ e.inverse ⋙ F ≅ F :=
(Functor.associator _ _ _).symm ≪≫ isoWhiskerRight e.unitIso.symm F ≪≫ F.leftUnitor
#align category_theory.equivalence.fun_inv_id_assoc CategoryTheory.Equivalence.funInvIdAssoc
@[simp]
theorem funInvIdAssoc_hom_app (e : C ≌ D) (F : C ⥤ E) (X : C) :
(funInvIdAssoc e F).hom.app X = F.map (e.unitInv.app X) := by
dsimp [funInvIdAssoc]
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.equivalence.fun_inv_id_assoc_hom_app CategoryTheory.Equivalence.funInvIdAssoc_hom_app
@[simp]
theorem funInvIdAssoc_inv_app (e : C ≌ D) (F : C ⥤ E) (X : C) :
(funInvIdAssoc e F).inv.app X = F.map (e.unit.app X) := by
dsimp [funInvIdAssoc]
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.equivalence.fun_inv_id_assoc_inv_app CategoryTheory.Equivalence.funInvIdAssoc_inv_app
def invFunIdAssoc (e : C ≌ D) (F : D ⥤ E) : e.inverse ⋙ e.functor ⋙ F ≅ F :=
(Functor.associator _ _ _).symm ≪≫ isoWhiskerRight e.counitIso F ≪≫ F.leftUnitor
#align category_theory.equivalence.inv_fun_id_assoc CategoryTheory.Equivalence.invFunIdAssoc
@[simp]
theorem invFunIdAssoc_hom_app (e : C ≌ D) (F : D ⥤ E) (X : D) :
(invFunIdAssoc e F).hom.app X = F.map (e.counit.app X) := by
dsimp [invFunIdAssoc]
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.equivalence.inv_fun_id_assoc_hom_app CategoryTheory.Equivalence.invFunIdAssoc_hom_app
@[simp]
theorem invFunIdAssoc_inv_app (e : C ≌ D) (F : D ⥤ E) (X : D) :
(invFunIdAssoc e F).inv.app X = F.map (e.counitInv.app X) := by
dsimp [invFunIdAssoc]
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.equivalence.inv_fun_id_assoc_inv_app CategoryTheory.Equivalence.invFunIdAssoc_inv_app
@[simps! functor inverse unitIso counitIso]
def congrLeft (e : C ≌ D) : C ⥤ E ≌ D ⥤ E :=
Equivalence.mk ((whiskeringLeft _ _ _).obj e.inverse) ((whiskeringLeft _ _ _).obj e.functor)
(NatIso.ofComponents fun F => (e.funInvIdAssoc F).symm)
(NatIso.ofComponents fun F => e.invFunIdAssoc F)
#align category_theory.equivalence.congr_left CategoryTheory.Equivalence.congrLeft
@[simps! functor inverse unitIso counitIso]
def congrRight (e : C ≌ D) : E ⥤ C ≌ E ⥤ D :=
Equivalence.mk ((whiskeringRight _ _ _).obj e.functor) ((whiskeringRight _ _ _).obj e.inverse)
(NatIso.ofComponents
fun F => F.rightUnitor.symm ≪≫ isoWhiskerLeft F e.unitIso ≪≫ Functor.associator _ _ _)
(NatIso.ofComponents
fun F => Functor.associator _ _ _ ≪≫ isoWhiskerLeft F e.counitIso ≪≫ F.rightUnitor)
#align category_theory.equivalence.congr_right CategoryTheory.Equivalence.congrRight
section CancellationLemmas
variable (e : C ≌ D)
@[simp]
theorem cancel_unit_right {X Y : C} (f f' : X ⟶ Y) :
f ≫ e.unit.app Y = f' ≫ e.unit.app Y ↔ f = f' := by simp only [cancel_mono]
#align category_theory.equivalence.cancel_unit_right CategoryTheory.Equivalence.cancel_unit_right
@[simp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Equivalence.lean | 390 | 391 | theorem cancel_unitInv_right {X Y : C} (f f' : X ⟶ e.inverse.obj (e.functor.obj Y)) :
f ≫ e.unitInv.app Y = f' ≫ e.unitInv.app Y ↔ f = f' := by | simp only [cancel_mono]
|
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
#align_import order.heyting.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9ac7c0c8c4d7a535ec3e5b34b8859aab9233b2f4"
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_himp fst_himp
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_himp snd_himp
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_hnot fst_hnot
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_hnot snd_hnot
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_sdiff fst_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_sdiff snd_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
#align fst_compl fst_compl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
#align snd_compl snd_compl
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
#align generalized_heyting_algebra GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
#align generalized_heyting_algebra.to_order_top GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra.to_order_bot GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
#align heyting_algebra HeytingAlgebra
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
#align coheyting_algebra CoheytingAlgebra
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
#align biheyting_algebra BiheytingAlgebra
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
--#align heyting_algebra.to_bounded_order HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
#align coheyting_algebra.to_bounded_order CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
#align biheyting_algebra.to_coheyting_algebra BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun a => rfl }
#align heyting_algebra.of_himp HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
#align heyting_algebra.of_compl HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun a => rfl }
#align coheyting_algebra.of_sdiff CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
#align coheyting_algebra.of_hnot CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp]
theorem le_himp_iff : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c :=
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.le_himp_iff _ _ _
#align le_himp_iff le_himp_iff
theorem le_himp_iff' : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ⊓ a ≤ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_comm]
#align le_himp_iff' le_himp_iff'
theorem le_himp_comm : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ≤ a ⇨ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff']
#align le_himp_comm le_himp_comm
theorem le_himp : a ≤ b ⇨ a :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_left
#align le_himp le_himp
theorem le_himp_iff_left : a ≤ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_idem]
#align le_himp_iff_left le_himp_iff_left
@[simp]
theorem himp_self : a ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 <| le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_right
#align himp_self himp_self
theorem himp_inf_le : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ b :=
le_himp_iff.1 le_rfl
#align himp_inf_le himp_inf_le
theorem inf_himp_le : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ≤ b := by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
#align inf_himp_le inf_himp_le
@[simp]
theorem inf_himp (a b : α) : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left <| by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]) <| inf_le_inf_left _ le_himp
#align inf_himp inf_himp
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_self (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a = b ⊓ a := by rw [inf_comm, inf_himp, inf_comm]
#align himp_inf_self himp_inf_self
@[simp]
theorem himp_eq_top_iff : a ⇨ b = ⊤ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← top_le_iff, le_himp_iff, top_inf_eq]
#align himp_eq_top_iff himp_eq_top_iff
@[simp]
theorem himp_top : a ⇨ ⊤ = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 le_top
#align himp_top himp_top
@[simp]
theorem top_himp : ⊤ ⇨ a = a :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun b => by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_top_eq]
#align top_himp top_himp
theorem himp_himp (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = a ⊓ b ⇨ c :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, inf_assoc]
#align himp_himp himp_himp
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 326 | 328 | theorem himp_le_himp_himp_himp : b ⇨ c ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ a ⇨ c := by |
rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff, inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, ← inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, inf_assoc]
exact inf_le_left
|
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Count
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Monotone
import Mathlib.Order.OrderIsoNat
#align_import data.nat.nth from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7fdd4f3746cb059edfdb5d52cba98f66fce418c0"
open Finset
namespace Nat
variable (p : ℕ → Prop)
noncomputable def nth (p : ℕ → Prop) (n : ℕ) : ℕ := by
classical exact
if h : Set.Finite (setOf p) then (h.toFinset.sort (· ≤ ·)).getD n 0
else @Nat.Subtype.orderIsoOfNat (setOf p) (Set.Infinite.to_subtype h) n
#align nat.nth Nat.nth
variable {p}
theorem nth_of_card_le (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {n : ℕ} (hn : hf.toFinset.card ≤ n) :
nth p n = 0 := by rw [nth, dif_pos hf, List.getD_eq_default]; rwa [Finset.length_sort]
#align nat.nth_of_card_le Nat.nth_of_card_le
theorem nth_eq_getD_sort (h : (setOf p).Finite) (n : ℕ) :
nth p n = (h.toFinset.sort (· ≤ ·)).getD n 0 :=
dif_pos h
#align nat.nth_eq_nthd_sort Nat.nth_eq_getD_sort
theorem nth_eq_orderEmbOfFin (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {n : ℕ} (hn : n < hf.toFinset.card) :
nth p n = hf.toFinset.orderEmbOfFin rfl ⟨n, hn⟩ := by
rw [nth_eq_getD_sort hf, Finset.orderEmbOfFin_apply, List.getD_eq_get]
#align nat.nth_eq_order_emb_of_fin Nat.nth_eq_orderEmbOfFin
theorem nth_strictMonoOn (hf : (setOf p).Finite) :
StrictMonoOn (nth p) (Set.Iio hf.toFinset.card) := by
rintro m (hm : m < _) n (hn : n < _) h
simp only [nth_eq_orderEmbOfFin, *]
exact OrderEmbedding.strictMono _ h
#align nat.nth_strict_mono_on Nat.nth_strictMonoOn
theorem nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {m n : ℕ} (h : m < n)
(hn : n < hf.toFinset.card) : nth p m < nth p n :=
nth_strictMonoOn hf (h.trans hn) hn h
#align nat.nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card Nat.nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card
theorem nth_le_nth_of_lt_card (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n)
(hn : n < hf.toFinset.card) : nth p m ≤ nth p n :=
(nth_strictMonoOn hf).monotoneOn (h.trans_lt hn) hn h
#align nat.nth_le_nth_of_lt_card Nat.nth_le_nth_of_lt_card
theorem lt_of_nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {m n : ℕ} (h : nth p m < nth p n)
(hm : m < hf.toFinset.card) : m < n :=
not_le.1 fun hle => h.not_le <| nth_le_nth_of_lt_card hf hle hm
#align nat.lt_of_nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card Nat.lt_of_nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card
theorem le_of_nth_le_nth_of_lt_card (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {m n : ℕ} (h : nth p m ≤ nth p n)
(hm : m < hf.toFinset.card) : m ≤ n :=
not_lt.1 fun hlt => h.not_lt <| nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card hf hlt hm
#align nat.le_of_nth_le_nth_of_lt_card Nat.le_of_nth_le_nth_of_lt_card
theorem nth_injOn (hf : (setOf p).Finite) : (Set.Iio hf.toFinset.card).InjOn (nth p) :=
(nth_strictMonoOn hf).injOn
#align nat.nth_inj_on Nat.nth_injOn
theorem range_nth_of_finite (hf : (setOf p).Finite) : Set.range (nth p) = insert 0 (setOf p) := by
simpa only [← nth_eq_getD_sort hf, mem_sort, Set.Finite.mem_toFinset]
using Set.range_list_getD (hf.toFinset.sort (· ≤ ·)) 0
#align nat.range_nth_of_finite Nat.range_nth_of_finite
@[simp]
theorem image_nth_Iio_card (hf : (setOf p).Finite) : nth p '' Set.Iio hf.toFinset.card = setOf p :=
calc
nth p '' Set.Iio hf.toFinset.card = Set.range (hf.toFinset.orderEmbOfFin rfl) := by
ext x
simp only [Set.mem_image, Set.mem_range, Fin.exists_iff, ← nth_eq_orderEmbOfFin hf,
Set.mem_Iio, exists_prop]
_ = setOf p := by rw [range_orderEmbOfFin, Set.Finite.coe_toFinset]
#align nat.image_nth_Iio_card Nat.image_nth_Iio_card
theorem nth_mem_of_lt_card {n : ℕ} (hf : (setOf p).Finite) (hlt : n < hf.toFinset.card) :
p (nth p n) :=
(image_nth_Iio_card hf).subset <| Set.mem_image_of_mem _ hlt
#align nat.nth_mem_of_lt_card Nat.nth_mem_of_lt_card
theorem exists_lt_card_finite_nth_eq (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {x} (h : p x) :
∃ n, n < hf.toFinset.card ∧ nth p n = x := by
rwa [← @Set.mem_setOf_eq _ _ p, ← image_nth_Iio_card hf] at h
#align nat.exists_lt_card_finite_nth_eq Nat.exists_lt_card_finite_nth_eq
theorem nth_apply_eq_orderIsoOfNat (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) (n : ℕ) :
nth p n = @Nat.Subtype.orderIsoOfNat (setOf p) hf.to_subtype n := by rw [nth, dif_neg hf]
#align nat.nth_apply_eq_order_iso_of_nat Nat.nth_apply_eq_orderIsoOfNat
theorem nth_eq_orderIsoOfNat (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) :
nth p = (↑) ∘ @Nat.Subtype.orderIsoOfNat (setOf p) hf.to_subtype :=
funext <| nth_apply_eq_orderIsoOfNat hf
#align nat.nth_eq_order_iso_of_nat Nat.nth_eq_orderIsoOfNat
theorem nth_strictMono (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) : StrictMono (nth p) := by
rw [nth_eq_orderIsoOfNat hf]
exact (Subtype.strictMono_coe _).comp (OrderIso.strictMono _)
#align nat.nth_strict_mono Nat.nth_strictMono
theorem nth_injective (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) : Function.Injective (nth p) :=
(nth_strictMono hf).injective
#align nat.nth_injective Nat.nth_injective
theorem nth_monotone (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) : Monotone (nth p) :=
(nth_strictMono hf).monotone
#align nat.nth_monotone Nat.nth_monotone
theorem nth_lt_nth (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) {k n} : nth p k < nth p n ↔ k < n :=
(nth_strictMono hf).lt_iff_lt
#align nat.nth_lt_nth Nat.nth_lt_nth
theorem nth_le_nth (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) {k n} : nth p k ≤ nth p n ↔ k ≤ n :=
(nth_strictMono hf).le_iff_le
#align nat.nth_le_nth Nat.nth_le_nth
theorem range_nth_of_infinite (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) : Set.range (nth p) = setOf p := by
rw [nth_eq_orderIsoOfNat hf]
haveI := hf.to_subtype
-- Porting note: added `classical`; probably, Lean 3 found instance by unification
classical exact Nat.Subtype.coe_comp_ofNat_range
#align nat.range_nth_of_infinite Nat.range_nth_of_infinite
theorem nth_mem_of_infinite (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) (n : ℕ) : p (nth p n) :=
Set.range_subset_iff.1 (range_nth_of_infinite hf).le n
#align nat.nth_mem_of_infinite Nat.nth_mem_of_infinite
theorem exists_lt_card_nth_eq {x} (h : p x) :
∃ n, (∀ hf : (setOf p).Finite, n < hf.toFinset.card) ∧ nth p n = x := by
refine (setOf p).finite_or_infinite.elim (fun hf => ?_) fun hf => ?_
· rcases exists_lt_card_finite_nth_eq hf h with ⟨n, hn, hx⟩
exact ⟨n, fun _ => hn, hx⟩
· rw [← @Set.mem_setOf_eq _ _ p, ← range_nth_of_infinite hf] at h
rcases h with ⟨n, hx⟩
exact ⟨n, fun hf' => absurd hf' hf, hx⟩
#align nat.exists_lt_card_nth_eq Nat.exists_lt_card_nth_eq
theorem subset_range_nth : setOf p ⊆ Set.range (nth p) := fun x (hx : p x) =>
let ⟨n, _, hn⟩ := exists_lt_card_nth_eq hx
⟨n, hn⟩
#align nat.subset_range_nth Nat.subset_range_nth
theorem range_nth_subset : Set.range (nth p) ⊆ insert 0 (setOf p) :=
(setOf p).finite_or_infinite.elim (fun h => (range_nth_of_finite h).subset) fun h =>
(range_nth_of_infinite h).trans_subset (Set.subset_insert _ _)
#align nat.range_nth_subset Nat.range_nth_subset
theorem nth_mem (n : ℕ) (h : ∀ hf : (setOf p).Finite, n < hf.toFinset.card) : p (nth p n) :=
(setOf p).finite_or_infinite.elim (fun hf => nth_mem_of_lt_card hf (h hf)) fun h =>
nth_mem_of_infinite h n
#align nat.nth_mem Nat.nth_mem
theorem nth_lt_nth' {m n : ℕ} (hlt : m < n) (h : ∀ hf : (setOf p).Finite, n < hf.toFinset.card) :
nth p m < nth p n :=
(setOf p).finite_or_infinite.elim (fun hf => nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card hf hlt (h _)) fun hf =>
(nth_lt_nth hf).2 hlt
#align nat.nth_lt_nth' Nat.nth_lt_nth'
theorem nth_le_nth' {m n : ℕ} (hle : m ≤ n) (h : ∀ hf : (setOf p).Finite, n < hf.toFinset.card) :
nth p m ≤ nth p n :=
(setOf p).finite_or_infinite.elim (fun hf => nth_le_nth_of_lt_card hf hle (h _)) fun hf =>
(nth_le_nth hf).2 hle
#align nat.nth_le_nth' Nat.nth_le_nth'
theorem le_nth {n : ℕ} (h : ∀ hf : (setOf p).Finite, n < hf.toFinset.card) : n ≤ nth p n :=
(setOf p).finite_or_infinite.elim
(fun hf => ((nth_strictMonoOn hf).mono <| Set.Iic_subset_Iio.2 (h _)).Iic_id_le _ le_rfl)
fun hf => (nth_strictMono hf).id_le _
#align nat.le_nth Nat.le_nth
theorem isLeast_nth {n} (h : ∀ hf : (setOf p).Finite, n < hf.toFinset.card) :
IsLeast {i | p i ∧ ∀ k < n, nth p k < i} (nth p n) :=
⟨⟨nth_mem n h, fun _k hk => nth_lt_nth' hk h⟩, fun _x hx =>
let ⟨k, hk, hkx⟩ := exists_lt_card_nth_eq hx.1
(lt_or_le k n).elim (fun hlt => absurd hkx (hx.2 _ hlt).ne) fun hle => hkx ▸ nth_le_nth' hle hk⟩
#align nat.is_least_nth Nat.isLeast_nth
theorem isLeast_nth_of_lt_card {n : ℕ} (hf : (setOf p).Finite) (hn : n < hf.toFinset.card) :
IsLeast {i | p i ∧ ∀ k < n, nth p k < i} (nth p n) :=
isLeast_nth fun _ => hn
#align nat.is_least_nth_of_lt_card Nat.isLeast_nth_of_lt_card
theorem isLeast_nth_of_infinite (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) (n : ℕ) :
IsLeast {i | p i ∧ ∀ k < n, nth p k < i} (nth p n) :=
isLeast_nth fun h => absurd h hf
#align nat.is_least_nth_of_infinite Nat.isLeast_nth_of_infinite
theorem nth_eq_sInf (p : ℕ → Prop) (n : ℕ) : nth p n = sInf {x | p x ∧ ∀ k < n, nth p k < x} := by
by_cases hn : ∀ hf : (setOf p).Finite, n < hf.toFinset.card
· exact (isLeast_nth hn).csInf_eq.symm
· push_neg at hn
rcases hn with ⟨hf, hn⟩
rw [nth_of_card_le _ hn]
refine ((congr_arg sInf <| Set.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem fun k hk => ?_).trans sInf_empty).symm
rcases exists_lt_card_nth_eq hk.1 with ⟨k, hlt, rfl⟩
exact (hk.2 _ ((hlt hf).trans_le hn)).false
#align nat.nth_eq_Inf Nat.nth_eq_sInf
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Nth.lean | 258 | 258 | theorem nth_zero : nth p 0 = sInf (setOf p) := by | rw [nth_eq_sInf]; simp
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Conjugation
#align_import linear_algebra.clifford_algebra.fold from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"446eb51ce0a90f8385f260d2b52e760e2004246b"
universe u1 u2 u3
variable {R M N : Type*}
variable [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup N]
variable [Module R M] [Module R N]
variable (Q : QuadraticForm R M)
namespace CliffordAlgebra
@[elab_as_elim]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/CliffordAlgebra/Fold.lean | 140 | 157 | theorem right_induction {P : CliffordAlgebra Q → Prop} (algebraMap : ∀ r : R, P (algebraMap _ _ r))
(add : ∀ x y, P x → P y → P (x + y)) (mul_ι : ∀ m x, P x → P (x * ι Q m)) : ∀ x, P x := by |
/- It would be neat if we could prove this via `foldr` like how we prove
`CliffordAlgebra.induction`, but going via the grading seems easier. -/
intro x
have : x ∈ ⊤ := Submodule.mem_top (R := R)
rw [← iSup_ι_range_eq_top] at this
induction this using Submodule.iSup_induction' with
| mem i x hx =>
induction hx using Submodule.pow_induction_on_right' with
| algebraMap r => exact algebraMap r
| add _x _y _i _ _ ihx ihy => exact add _ _ ihx ihy
| mul_mem _i x _hx px m hm =>
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := hm
exact mul_ι _ _ px
| zero => simpa only [map_zero] using algebraMap 0
| add _x _y _ _ ihx ihy =>
exact add _ _ ihx ihy
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Hom
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Card
#align_import data.finset.noncomm_prod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"509de852e1de55e1efa8eacfa11df0823f26f226"
variable {F ι α β γ : Type*} (f : α → β → β) (op : α → α → α)
namespace Multiset
def noncommFoldr (s : Multiset α)
(comm : { x | x ∈ s }.Pairwise fun x y => ∀ b, f x (f y b) = f y (f x b)) (b : β) : β :=
s.attach.foldr (f ∘ Subtype.val)
(fun ⟨_, hx⟩ ⟨_, hy⟩ =>
haveI : IsRefl α fun x y => ∀ b, f x (f y b) = f y (f x b) := ⟨fun _ _ => rfl⟩
comm.of_refl hx hy)
b
#align multiset.noncomm_foldr Multiset.noncommFoldr
@[simp]
theorem noncommFoldr_coe (l : List α) (comm) (b : β) :
noncommFoldr f (l : Multiset α) comm b = l.foldr f b := by
simp only [noncommFoldr, coe_foldr, coe_attach, List.attach, List.attachWith, Function.comp]
rw [← List.foldr_map]
simp [List.map_pmap]
#align multiset.noncomm_foldr_coe Multiset.noncommFoldr_coe
@[simp]
theorem noncommFoldr_empty (h) (b : β) : noncommFoldr f (0 : Multiset α) h b = b :=
rfl
#align multiset.noncomm_foldr_empty Multiset.noncommFoldr_empty
theorem noncommFoldr_cons (s : Multiset α) (a : α) (h h') (b : β) :
noncommFoldr f (a ::ₘ s) h b = f a (noncommFoldr f s h' b) := by
induction s using Quotient.inductionOn
simp
#align multiset.noncomm_foldr_cons Multiset.noncommFoldr_cons
theorem noncommFoldr_eq_foldr (s : Multiset α) (h : LeftCommutative f) (b : β) :
noncommFoldr f s (fun x _ y _ _ => h x y) b = foldr f h b s := by
induction s using Quotient.inductionOn
simp
#align multiset.noncomm_foldr_eq_foldr Multiset.noncommFoldr_eq_foldr
section assoc
variable [assoc : Std.Associative op]
def noncommFold (s : Multiset α) (comm : { x | x ∈ s }.Pairwise fun x y => op x y = op y x) :
α → α :=
noncommFoldr op s fun x hx y hy h b => by rw [← assoc.assoc, comm hx hy h, assoc.assoc]
#align multiset.noncomm_fold Multiset.noncommFold
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/NoncommProd.lean | 88 | 89 | theorem noncommFold_coe (l : List α) (comm) (a : α) :
noncommFold op (l : Multiset α) comm a = l.foldr op a := by | simp [noncommFold]
|
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.DegreeSum
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Subgraph
#align_import combinatorics.simple_graph.matching from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"138448ae98f529ef34eeb61114191975ee2ca508"
universe u
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type u} {G : SimpleGraph V} (M : Subgraph G)
namespace Subgraph
def IsMatching : Prop := ∀ ⦃v⦄, v ∈ M.verts → ∃! w, M.Adj v w
#align simple_graph.subgraph.is_matching SimpleGraph.Subgraph.IsMatching
noncomputable def IsMatching.toEdge {M : Subgraph G} (h : M.IsMatching) (v : M.verts) : M.edgeSet :=
⟨s(v, (h v.property).choose), (h v.property).choose_spec.1⟩
#align simple_graph.subgraph.is_matching.to_edge SimpleGraph.Subgraph.IsMatching.toEdge
theorem IsMatching.toEdge_eq_of_adj {M : Subgraph G} (h : M.IsMatching) {v w : V} (hv : v ∈ M.verts)
(hvw : M.Adj v w) : h.toEdge ⟨v, hv⟩ = ⟨s(v, w), hvw⟩ := by
simp only [IsMatching.toEdge, Subtype.mk_eq_mk]
congr
exact ((h (M.edge_vert hvw)).choose_spec.2 w hvw).symm
#align simple_graph.subgraph.is_matching.to_edge_eq_of_adj SimpleGraph.Subgraph.IsMatching.toEdge_eq_of_adj
theorem IsMatching.toEdge.surjective {M : Subgraph G} (h : M.IsMatching) :
Function.Surjective h.toEdge := by
rintro ⟨e, he⟩
refine Sym2.ind (fun x y he => ?_) e he
exact ⟨⟨x, M.edge_vert he⟩, h.toEdge_eq_of_adj _ he⟩
#align simple_graph.subgraph.is_matching.to_edge.surjective SimpleGraph.Subgraph.IsMatching.toEdge.surjective
theorem IsMatching.toEdge_eq_toEdge_of_adj {M : Subgraph G} {v w : V} (h : M.IsMatching)
(hv : v ∈ M.verts) (hw : w ∈ M.verts) (ha : M.Adj v w) :
h.toEdge ⟨v, hv⟩ = h.toEdge ⟨w, hw⟩ := by
rw [h.toEdge_eq_of_adj hv ha, h.toEdge_eq_of_adj hw (M.symm ha), Subtype.mk_eq_mk, Sym2.eq_swap]
#align simple_graph.subgraph.is_matching.to_edge_eq_to_edge_of_adj SimpleGraph.Subgraph.IsMatching.toEdge_eq_toEdge_of_adj
def IsPerfectMatching : Prop := M.IsMatching ∧ M.IsSpanning
#align simple_graph.subgraph.is_perfect_matching SimpleGraph.Subgraph.IsPerfectMatching
theorem IsMatching.support_eq_verts {M : Subgraph G} (h : M.IsMatching) : M.support = M.verts := by
refine M.support_subset_verts.antisymm fun v hv => ?_
obtain ⟨w, hvw, -⟩ := h hv
exact ⟨_, hvw⟩
#align simple_graph.subgraph.is_matching.support_eq_verts SimpleGraph.Subgraph.IsMatching.support_eq_verts
theorem isMatching_iff_forall_degree {M : Subgraph G} [∀ v : V, Fintype (M.neighborSet v)] :
M.IsMatching ↔ ∀ v : V, v ∈ M.verts → M.degree v = 1 := by
simp only [degree_eq_one_iff_unique_adj, IsMatching]
#align simple_graph.subgraph.is_matching_iff_forall_degree SimpleGraph.Subgraph.isMatching_iff_forall_degree
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Matching.lean | 101 | 111 | theorem IsMatching.even_card {M : Subgraph G} [Fintype M.verts] (h : M.IsMatching) :
Even M.verts.toFinset.card := by |
classical
rw [isMatching_iff_forall_degree] at h
use M.coe.edgeFinset.card
rw [← two_mul, ← M.coe.sum_degrees_eq_twice_card_edges]
-- Porting note: `SimpleGraph.Subgraph.coe_degree` does not trigger because it uses
-- instance arguments instead of implicit arguments for the first `Fintype` argument.
-- Using a `convert_to` to swap out the `Fintype` instance to the "right" one.
convert_to _ = Finset.sum Finset.univ fun v => SimpleGraph.degree (Subgraph.coe M) v using 3
simp [h, Finset.card_univ]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.ConjFinite
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Abelianization
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.ConjAct
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Quotient
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Index
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.SpecificGroups.Dihedral
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
import Mathlib.Tactic.LinearCombination
import Mathlib.Tactic.Qify
#align_import group_theory.commuting_probability from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"dc6c365e751e34d100e80fe6e314c3c3e0fd2988"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Fintype
variable (M : Type*) [Mul M]
def commProb : ℚ :=
Nat.card { p : M × M // Commute p.1 p.2 } / (Nat.card M : ℚ) ^ 2
#align comm_prob commProb
theorem commProb_def :
commProb M = Nat.card { p : M × M // Commute p.1 p.2 } / (Nat.card M : ℚ) ^ 2 :=
rfl
#align comm_prob_def commProb_def
theorem commProb_prod (M' : Type*) [Mul M'] : commProb (M × M') = commProb M * commProb M' := by
simp_rw [commProb_def, div_mul_div_comm, Nat.card_prod, Nat.cast_mul, mul_pow, ← Nat.cast_mul,
← Nat.card_prod, Commute, SemiconjBy, Prod.ext_iff]
congr 2
exact Nat.card_congr ⟨fun x => ⟨⟨⟨x.1.1.1, x.1.2.1⟩, x.2.1⟩, ⟨⟨x.1.1.2, x.1.2.2⟩, x.2.2⟩⟩,
fun x => ⟨⟨⟨x.1.1.1, x.2.1.1⟩, ⟨x.1.1.2, x.2.1.2⟩⟩, ⟨x.1.2, x.2.2⟩⟩, fun x => rfl, fun x => rfl⟩
theorem commProb_pi {α : Type*} (i : α → Type*) [Fintype α] [∀ a, Mul (i a)] :
commProb (∀ a, i a) = ∏ a, commProb (i a) := by
simp_rw [commProb_def, Finset.prod_div_distrib, Finset.prod_pow, ← Nat.cast_prod,
← Nat.card_pi, Commute, SemiconjBy, Function.funext_iff]
congr 2
exact Nat.card_congr ⟨fun x a => ⟨⟨x.1.1 a, x.1.2 a⟩, x.2 a⟩, fun x => ⟨⟨fun a => (x a).1.1,
fun a => (x a).1.2⟩, fun a => (x a).2⟩, fun x => rfl, fun x => rfl⟩
theorem commProb_function {α β : Type*} [Fintype α] [Mul β] :
commProb (α → β) = (commProb β) ^ Fintype.card α := by
rw [commProb_pi, Finset.prod_const, Finset.card_univ]
@[simp]
theorem commProb_eq_zero_of_infinite [Infinite M] : commProb M = 0 :=
div_eq_zero_iff.2 (Or.inl (Nat.cast_eq_zero.2 Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite))
variable [Finite M]
theorem commProb_pos [h : Nonempty M] : 0 < commProb M :=
h.elim fun x ↦
div_pos (Nat.cast_pos.mpr (Finite.card_pos_iff.mpr ⟨⟨(x, x), rfl⟩⟩))
(pow_pos (Nat.cast_pos.mpr Finite.card_pos) 2)
#align comm_prob_pos commProb_pos
theorem commProb_le_one : commProb M ≤ 1 := by
refine div_le_one_of_le ?_ (sq_nonneg (Nat.card M : ℚ))
rw [← Nat.cast_pow, Nat.cast_le, sq, ← Nat.card_prod]
apply Finite.card_subtype_le
#align comm_prob_le_one commProb_le_one
variable {M}
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/CommutingProbability.lean | 86 | 93 | theorem commProb_eq_one_iff [h : Nonempty M] :
commProb M = 1 ↔ Commutative ((· * ·) : M → M → M) := by |
haveI := Fintype.ofFinite M
rw [commProb, ← Set.coe_setOf, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card]
rw [div_eq_one_iff_eq, ← Nat.cast_pow, Nat.cast_inj, sq, ← card_prod,
set_fintype_card_eq_univ_iff, Set.eq_univ_iff_forall]
· exact ⟨fun h x y ↦ h (x, y), fun h x ↦ h x.1 x.2⟩
· exact pow_ne_zero 2 (Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr card_ne_zero)
|
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Basic
variable {l m n o : Type*}
universe u v w
variable {R : Type*} {α : Type v} {β : Type w}
namespace Matrix
def col (w : m → α) : Matrix m Unit α :=
of fun x _ => w x
#align matrix.col Matrix.col
-- TODO: set as an equation lemma for `col`, see mathlib4#3024
@[simp]
theorem col_apply (w : m → α) (i j) : col w i j = w i :=
rfl
#align matrix.col_apply Matrix.col_apply
def row (v : n → α) : Matrix Unit n α :=
of fun _ y => v y
#align matrix.row Matrix.row
-- TODO: set as an equation lemma for `row`, see mathlib4#3024
@[simp]
theorem row_apply (v : n → α) (i j) : row v i j = v j :=
rfl
#align matrix.row_apply Matrix.row_apply
theorem col_injective : Function.Injective (col : (m → α) → _) :=
fun _x _y h => funext fun i => congr_fun₂ h i ()
@[simp] theorem col_inj {v w : m → α} : col v = col w ↔ v = w := col_injective.eq_iff
@[simp] theorem col_zero [Zero α] : col (0 : m → α) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem col_eq_zero [Zero α] (v : m → α) : col v = 0 ↔ v = 0 := col_inj
@[simp]
theorem col_add [Add α] (v w : m → α) : col (v + w) = col v + col w := by
ext
rfl
#align matrix.col_add Matrix.col_add
@[simp]
theorem col_smul [SMul R α] (x : R) (v : m → α) : col (x • v) = x • col v := by
ext
rfl
#align matrix.col_smul Matrix.col_smul
theorem row_injective : Function.Injective (row : (n → α) → _) :=
fun _x _y h => funext fun j => congr_fun₂ h () j
@[simp] theorem row_inj {v w : n → α} : row v = row w ↔ v = w := row_injective.eq_iff
@[simp] theorem row_zero [Zero α] : row (0 : n → α) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem row_eq_zero [Zero α] (v : n → α) : row v = 0 ↔ v = 0 := row_inj
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/RowCol.lean | 82 | 84 | theorem row_add [Add α] (v w : m → α) : row (v + w) = row v + row w := by |
ext
rfl
|
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.CoprodI
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Coprod.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.QuotientGroup
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Complement
namespace Monoid
open CoprodI Subgroup Coprod Function List
variable {ι : Type*} {G : ι → Type*} {H : Type*} {K : Type*} [Monoid K]
def PushoutI.con [∀ i, Monoid (G i)] [Monoid H] (φ : ∀ i, H →* G i) :
Con (Coprod (CoprodI G) H) :=
conGen (fun x y : Coprod (CoprodI G) H =>
∃ i x', x = inl (of (φ i x')) ∧ y = inr x')
def PushoutI [∀ i, Monoid (G i)] [Monoid H] (φ : ∀ i, H →* G i) : Type _ :=
(PushoutI.con φ).Quotient
namespace PushoutI
section Monoid
variable [∀ i, Monoid (G i)] [Monoid H] {φ : ∀ i, H →* G i}
protected instance mul : Mul (PushoutI φ) := by
delta PushoutI; infer_instance
protected instance one : One (PushoutI φ) := by
delta PushoutI; infer_instance
instance monoid : Monoid (PushoutI φ) :=
{ Con.monoid _ with
toMul := PushoutI.mul
toOne := PushoutI.one }
def of (i : ι) : G i →* PushoutI φ :=
(Con.mk' _).comp <| inl.comp CoprodI.of
variable (φ) in
def base : H →* PushoutI φ :=
(Con.mk' _).comp inr
theorem of_comp_eq_base (i : ι) : (of i).comp (φ i) = (base φ) := by
ext x
apply (Con.eq _).2
refine ConGen.Rel.of _ _ ?_
simp only [MonoidHom.comp_apply, Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_range]
exact ⟨_, _, rfl, rfl⟩
variable (φ) in
theorem of_apply_eq_base (i : ι) (x : H) : of i (φ i x) = base φ x := by
rw [← MonoidHom.comp_apply, of_comp_eq_base]
def lift (f : ∀ i, G i →* K) (k : H →* K)
(hf : ∀ i, (f i).comp (φ i) = k) :
PushoutI φ →* K :=
Con.lift _ (Coprod.lift (CoprodI.lift f) k) <| by
apply Con.conGen_le fun x y => ?_
rintro ⟨i, x', rfl, rfl⟩
simp only [DFunLike.ext_iff, MonoidHom.coe_comp, comp_apply] at hf
simp [hf]
@[simp]
theorem lift_of (f : ∀ i, G i →* K) (k : H →* K)
(hf : ∀ i, (f i).comp (φ i) = k)
{i : ι} (g : G i) : (lift f k hf) (of i g : PushoutI φ) = f i g := by
delta PushoutI lift of
simp only [MonoidHom.coe_comp, Con.coe_mk', comp_apply, Con.lift_coe,
lift_apply_inl, CoprodI.lift_of]
@[simp]
theorem lift_base (f : ∀ i, G i →* K) (k : H →* K)
(hf : ∀ i, (f i).comp (φ i) = k)
(g : H) : (lift f k hf) (base φ g : PushoutI φ) = k g := by
delta PushoutI lift base
simp only [MonoidHom.coe_comp, Con.coe_mk', comp_apply, Con.lift_coe, lift_apply_inr]
-- `ext` attribute should be lower priority then `hom_ext_nonempty`
@[ext 1199]
theorem hom_ext {f g : PushoutI φ →* K}
(h : ∀ i, f.comp (of i : G i →* _) = g.comp (of i : G i →* _))
(hbase : f.comp (base φ) = g.comp (base φ)) : f = g :=
(MonoidHom.cancel_right Con.mk'_surjective).mp <|
Coprod.hom_ext
(CoprodI.ext_hom _ _ h)
hbase
@[ext high]
theorem hom_ext_nonempty [hn : Nonempty ι]
{f g : PushoutI φ →* K}
(h : ∀ i, f.comp (of i : G i →* _) = g.comp (of i : G i →* _)) : f = g :=
hom_ext h <| by
cases hn with
| intro i =>
ext
rw [← of_comp_eq_base i, ← MonoidHom.comp_assoc, h, MonoidHom.comp_assoc]
@[simps]
def homEquiv :
(PushoutI φ →* K) ≃ { f : (Π i, G i →* K) × (H →* K) // ∀ i, (f.1 i).comp (φ i) = f.2 } :=
{ toFun := fun f => ⟨(fun i => f.comp (of i), f.comp (base φ)),
fun i => by rw [MonoidHom.comp_assoc, of_comp_eq_base]⟩
invFun := fun f => lift f.1.1 f.1.2 f.2,
left_inv := fun _ => hom_ext (by simp [DFunLike.ext_iff])
(by simp [DFunLike.ext_iff])
right_inv := fun ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩ => by simp [DFunLike.ext_iff, Function.funext_iff] }
def ofCoprodI : CoprodI G →* PushoutI φ :=
CoprodI.lift of
@[simp]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/PushoutI.lean | 163 | 165 | theorem ofCoprodI_of (i : ι) (g : G i) :
(ofCoprodI (CoprodI.of g) : PushoutI φ) = of i g := by |
simp [ofCoprodI]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.FieldDivision
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Minpoly.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Adjoin.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FinitePresentation
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FiniteType
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerBasis
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PrincipalIdealDomain
import Mathlib.RingTheory.QuotientNoetherian
#align_import ring_theory.adjoin_root from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5c4b3d41a84bd2a1d79c7d9265e58a891e71be89"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Polynomial
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {K : Type w}
open Polynomial Ideal
def AdjoinRoot [CommRing R] (f : R[X]) : Type u :=
Polynomial R ⧸ (span {f} : Ideal R[X])
#align adjoin_root AdjoinRoot
namespace AdjoinRoot
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] (f : R[X])
instance instCommRing : CommRing (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Ideal.Quotient.commRing _
#align adjoin_root.comm_ring AdjoinRoot.instCommRing
instance : Inhabited (AdjoinRoot f) :=
⟨0⟩
instance : DecidableEq (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Classical.decEq _
protected theorem nontrivial [IsDomain R] (h : degree f ≠ 0) : Nontrivial (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Ideal.Quotient.nontrivial
(by
simp_rw [Ne, span_singleton_eq_top, Polynomial.isUnit_iff, not_exists, not_and]
rintro x hx rfl
exact h (degree_C hx.ne_zero))
#align adjoin_root.nontrivial AdjoinRoot.nontrivial
def mk : R[X] →+* AdjoinRoot f :=
Ideal.Quotient.mk _
#align adjoin_root.mk AdjoinRoot.mk
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on {C : AdjoinRoot f → Prop} (x : AdjoinRoot f) (ih : ∀ p : R[X], C (mk f p)) :
C x :=
Quotient.inductionOn' x ih
#align adjoin_root.induction_on AdjoinRoot.induction_on
def of : R →+* AdjoinRoot f :=
(mk f).comp C
#align adjoin_root.of AdjoinRoot.of
instance instSMulAdjoinRoot [DistribSMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] : SMul S (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Submodule.Quotient.instSMul' _
instance [DistribSMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] : DistribSMul S (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Submodule.Quotient.distribSMul' _
@[simp]
theorem smul_mk [DistribSMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] (a : S) (x : R[X]) :
a • mk f x = mk f (a • x) :=
rfl
#align adjoin_root.smul_mk AdjoinRoot.smul_mk
theorem smul_of [DistribSMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] (a : S) (x : R) :
a • of f x = of f (a • x) := by rw [of, RingHom.comp_apply, RingHom.comp_apply, smul_mk, smul_C]
#align adjoin_root.smul_of AdjoinRoot.smul_of
instance (R₁ R₂ : Type*) [SMul R₁ R₂] [DistribSMul R₁ R] [DistribSMul R₂ R] [IsScalarTower R₁ R R]
[IsScalarTower R₂ R R] [IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ R] (f : R[X]) :
IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Submodule.Quotient.isScalarTower _ _
instance (R₁ R₂ : Type*) [DistribSMul R₁ R] [DistribSMul R₂ R] [IsScalarTower R₁ R R]
[IsScalarTower R₂ R R] [SMulCommClass R₁ R₂ R] (f : R[X]) :
SMulCommClass R₁ R₂ (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Submodule.Quotient.smulCommClass _ _
instance isScalarTower_right [DistribSMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] :
IsScalarTower S (AdjoinRoot f) (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Ideal.Quotient.isScalarTower_right
#align adjoin_root.is_scalar_tower_right AdjoinRoot.isScalarTower_right
instance [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] (f : R[X]) :
DistribMulAction S (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Submodule.Quotient.distribMulAction' _
instance [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S R] : Algebra S (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Ideal.Quotient.algebra S
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_eq : algebraMap R (AdjoinRoot f) = of f :=
rfl
#align adjoin_root.algebra_map_eq AdjoinRoot.algebraMap_eq
variable (S)
theorem algebraMap_eq' [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S R] :
algebraMap S (AdjoinRoot f) = (of f).comp (algebraMap S R) :=
rfl
#align adjoin_root.algebra_map_eq' AdjoinRoot.algebraMap_eq'
variable {S}
theorem finiteType : Algebra.FiniteType R (AdjoinRoot f) :=
(Algebra.FiniteType.polynomial R).of_surjective _ (Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ_surjective R _)
#align adjoin_root.finite_type AdjoinRoot.finiteType
theorem finitePresentation : Algebra.FinitePresentation R (AdjoinRoot f) :=
(Algebra.FinitePresentation.polynomial R).quotient (Submodule.fg_span_singleton f)
#align adjoin_root.finite_presentation AdjoinRoot.finitePresentation
def root : AdjoinRoot f :=
mk f X
#align adjoin_root.root AdjoinRoot.root
variable {f}
instance hasCoeT : CoeTC R (AdjoinRoot f) :=
⟨of f⟩
#align adjoin_root.has_coe_t AdjoinRoot.hasCoeT
@[ext]
theorem algHom_ext [Semiring S] [Algebra R S] {g₁ g₂ : AdjoinRoot f →ₐ[R] S}
(h : g₁ (root f) = g₂ (root f)) : g₁ = g₂ :=
Ideal.Quotient.algHom_ext R <| Polynomial.algHom_ext h
#align adjoin_root.alg_hom_ext AdjoinRoot.algHom_ext
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_mk {g h : R[X]} : mk f g = mk f h ↔ f ∣ g - h :=
Ideal.Quotient.eq.trans Ideal.mem_span_singleton
#align adjoin_root.mk_eq_mk AdjoinRoot.mk_eq_mk
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_zero {g : R[X]} : mk f g = 0 ↔ f ∣ g :=
mk_eq_mk.trans <| by rw [sub_zero]
#align adjoin_root.mk_eq_zero AdjoinRoot.mk_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem mk_self : mk f f = 0 :=
Quotient.sound' <| QuotientAddGroup.leftRel_apply.mpr (mem_span_singleton.2 <| by simp)
#align adjoin_root.mk_self AdjoinRoot.mk_self
@[simp]
theorem mk_C (x : R) : mk f (C x) = x :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align adjoin_root.mk_C AdjoinRoot.mk_C
@[simp]
theorem mk_X : mk f X = root f :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align adjoin_root.mk_X AdjoinRoot.mk_X
theorem mk_ne_zero_of_degree_lt (hf : Monic f) {g : R[X]} (h0 : g ≠ 0) (hd : degree g < degree f) :
mk f g ≠ 0 :=
mk_eq_zero.not.2 <| hf.not_dvd_of_degree_lt h0 hd
#align adjoin_root.mk_ne_zero_of_degree_lt AdjoinRoot.mk_ne_zero_of_degree_lt
theorem mk_ne_zero_of_natDegree_lt (hf : Monic f) {g : R[X]} (h0 : g ≠ 0)
(hd : natDegree g < natDegree f) : mk f g ≠ 0 :=
mk_eq_zero.not.2 <| hf.not_dvd_of_natDegree_lt h0 hd
#align adjoin_root.mk_ne_zero_of_nat_degree_lt AdjoinRoot.mk_ne_zero_of_natDegree_lt
@[simp]
theorem aeval_eq (p : R[X]) : aeval (root f) p = mk f p :=
Polynomial.induction_on p
(fun x => by
rw [aeval_C]
rfl)
(fun p q ihp ihq => by rw [AlgHom.map_add, RingHom.map_add, ihp, ihq]) fun n x _ => by
rw [AlgHom.map_mul, aeval_C, AlgHom.map_pow, aeval_X, RingHom.map_mul, mk_C, RingHom.map_pow,
mk_X]
rfl
#align adjoin_root.aeval_eq AdjoinRoot.aeval_eq
-- Porting note: the following proof was partly in term-mode, but I was not able to fix it.
theorem adjoinRoot_eq_top : Algebra.adjoin R ({root f} : Set (AdjoinRoot f)) = ⊤ := by
refine Algebra.eq_top_iff.2 fun x => ?_
induction x using AdjoinRoot.induction_on with
| ih p => exact (Algebra.adjoin_singleton_eq_range_aeval R (root f)).symm ▸ ⟨p, aeval_eq p⟩
#align adjoin_root.adjoin_root_eq_top AdjoinRoot.adjoinRoot_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_root (f : R[X]) : f.eval₂ (of f) (root f) = 0 := by
rw [← algebraMap_eq, ← aeval_def, aeval_eq, mk_self]
#align adjoin_root.eval₂_root AdjoinRoot.eval₂_root
theorem isRoot_root (f : R[X]) : IsRoot (f.map (of f)) (root f) := by
rw [IsRoot, eval_map, eval₂_root]
#align adjoin_root.is_root_root AdjoinRoot.isRoot_root
theorem isAlgebraic_root (hf : f ≠ 0) : IsAlgebraic R (root f) :=
⟨f, hf, eval₂_root f⟩
#align adjoin_root.is_algebraic_root AdjoinRoot.isAlgebraic_root
theorem of.injective_of_degree_ne_zero [IsDomain R] (hf : f.degree ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective (AdjoinRoot.of f) := by
rw [injective_iff_map_eq_zero]
intro p hp
rw [AdjoinRoot.of, RingHom.comp_apply, AdjoinRoot.mk_eq_zero] at hp
by_cases h : f = 0
· exact C_eq_zero.mp (eq_zero_of_zero_dvd (by rwa [h] at hp))
· contrapose! hf with h_contra
rw [← degree_C h_contra]
apply le_antisymm (degree_le_of_dvd hp (by rwa [Ne, C_eq_zero])) _
rwa [degree_C h_contra, zero_le_degree_iff]
#align adjoin_root.of.injective_of_degree_ne_zero AdjoinRoot.of.injective_of_degree_ne_zero
variable [CommRing S]
def lift (i : R →+* S) (x : S) (h : f.eval₂ i x = 0) : AdjoinRoot f →+* S := by
apply Ideal.Quotient.lift _ (eval₂RingHom i x)
intro g H
rcases mem_span_singleton.1 H with ⟨y, hy⟩
rw [hy, RingHom.map_mul, coe_eval₂RingHom, h, zero_mul]
#align adjoin_root.lift AdjoinRoot.lift
variable {i : R →+* S} {a : S} (h : f.eval₂ i a = 0)
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk (g : R[X]) : lift i a h (mk f g) = g.eval₂ i a :=
Ideal.Quotient.lift_mk _ _ _
#align adjoin_root.lift_mk AdjoinRoot.lift_mk
@[simp]
theorem lift_root : lift i a h (root f) = a := by rw [root, lift_mk, eval₂_X]
#align adjoin_root.lift_root AdjoinRoot.lift_root
@[simp]
theorem lift_of {x : R} : lift i a h x = i x := by rw [← mk_C x, lift_mk, eval₂_C]
#align adjoin_root.lift_of AdjoinRoot.lift_of
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_of : (lift i a h).comp (of f) = i :=
RingHom.ext fun _ => @lift_of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ h _
#align adjoin_root.lift_comp_of AdjoinRoot.lift_comp_of
variable (f) [Algebra R S]
def liftHom (x : S) (hfx : aeval x f = 0) : AdjoinRoot f →ₐ[R] S :=
{ lift (algebraMap R S) x hfx with
commutes' := fun r => show lift _ _ hfx r = _ from lift_of hfx }
#align adjoin_root.lift_hom AdjoinRoot.liftHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_liftHom (x : S) (hfx : aeval x f = 0) :
(liftHom f x hfx : AdjoinRoot f →+* S) = lift (algebraMap R S) x hfx :=
rfl
#align adjoin_root.coe_lift_hom AdjoinRoot.coe_liftHom
@[simp]
theorem aeval_algHom_eq_zero (ϕ : AdjoinRoot f →ₐ[R] S) : aeval (ϕ (root f)) f = 0 := by
have h : ϕ.toRingHom.comp (of f) = algebraMap R S := RingHom.ext_iff.mpr ϕ.commutes
rw [aeval_def, ← h, ← RingHom.map_zero ϕ.toRingHom, ← eval₂_root f, hom_eval₂]
rfl
#align adjoin_root.aeval_alg_hom_eq_zero AdjoinRoot.aeval_algHom_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem liftHom_eq_algHom (f : R[X]) (ϕ : AdjoinRoot f →ₐ[R] S) :
liftHom f (ϕ (root f)) (aeval_algHom_eq_zero f ϕ) = ϕ := by
suffices ϕ.equalizer (liftHom f (ϕ (root f)) (aeval_algHom_eq_zero f ϕ)) = ⊤ by
exact (AlgHom.ext fun x => (SetLike.ext_iff.mp this x).mpr Algebra.mem_top).symm
rw [eq_top_iff, ← adjoinRoot_eq_top, Algebra.adjoin_le_iff, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
exact (@lift_root _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (aeval_algHom_eq_zero f ϕ)).symm
#align adjoin_root.lift_hom_eq_alg_hom AdjoinRoot.liftHom_eq_algHom
variable (hfx : aeval a f = 0)
@[simp]
theorem liftHom_mk {g : R[X]} : liftHom f a hfx (mk f g) = aeval a g :=
lift_mk hfx g
#align adjoin_root.lift_hom_mk AdjoinRoot.liftHom_mk
@[simp]
theorem liftHom_root : liftHom f a hfx (root f) = a :=
lift_root hfx
#align adjoin_root.lift_hom_root AdjoinRoot.liftHom_root
@[simp]
theorem liftHom_of {x : R} : liftHom f a hfx (of f x) = algebraMap _ _ x :=
lift_of hfx
#align adjoin_root.lift_hom_of AdjoinRoot.liftHom_of
section PowerBasis
variable [CommRing R] {g : R[X]}
theorem isIntegral_root' (hg : g.Monic) : IsIntegral R (root g) :=
⟨g, hg, eval₂_root g⟩
#align adjoin_root.is_integral_root' AdjoinRoot.isIntegral_root'
def modByMonicHom (hg : g.Monic) : AdjoinRoot g →ₗ[R] R[X] :=
(Submodule.liftQ _ (Polynomial.modByMonicHom g)
fun f (hf : f ∈ (Ideal.span {g}).restrictScalars R) =>
(mem_ker_modByMonic hg).mpr (Ideal.mem_span_singleton.mp hf)).comp <|
(Submodule.Quotient.restrictScalarsEquiv R (Ideal.span {g} : Ideal R[X])).symm.toLinearMap
#align adjoin_root.mod_by_monic_hom AdjoinRoot.modByMonicHom
@[simp]
theorem modByMonicHom_mk (hg : g.Monic) (f : R[X]) : modByMonicHom hg (mk g f) = f %ₘ g :=
rfl
#align adjoin_root.mod_by_monic_hom_mk AdjoinRoot.modByMonicHom_mk
-- Porting note: the following proof was partly in term-mode, but I was not able to fix it.
| Mathlib/RingTheory/AdjoinRoot.lean | 463 | 468 | theorem mk_leftInverse (hg : g.Monic) : Function.LeftInverse (mk g) (modByMonicHom hg) := by |
intro f
induction f using AdjoinRoot.induction_on
rw [modByMonicHom_mk hg, mk_eq_mk, modByMonic_eq_sub_mul_div _ hg, sub_sub_cancel_left,
dvd_neg]
apply dvd_mul_right
|
import Mathlib.RepresentationTheory.Basic
import Mathlib.RepresentationTheory.FdRep
#align_import representation_theory.invariants from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"55b3f8206b8596db8bb1804d8a92814a0b6670c9"
suppress_compilation
open MonoidAlgebra
open Representation
namespace GroupAlgebra
variable (k G : Type*) [CommSemiring k] [Group G]
variable [Fintype G] [Invertible (Fintype.card G : k)]
noncomputable def average : MonoidAlgebra k G :=
⅟ (Fintype.card G : k) • ∑ g : G, of k G g
#align group_algebra.average GroupAlgebra.average
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RepresentationTheory/Invariants.lean | 43 | 48 | theorem mul_average_left (g : G) : ↑(Finsupp.single g 1) * average k G = average k G := by |
simp only [mul_one, Finset.mul_sum, Algebra.mul_smul_comm, average, MonoidAlgebra.of_apply,
Finset.sum_congr, MonoidAlgebra.single_mul_single]
set f : G → MonoidAlgebra k G := fun x => Finsupp.single x 1
show ⅟ (Fintype.card G : k) • ∑ x : G, f (g * x) = ⅟ (Fintype.card G : k) • ∑ x : G, f x
rw [Function.Bijective.sum_comp (Group.mulLeft_bijective g) _]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.unoriented.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"46b633fd842bef9469441c0209906f6dddd2b4f5"
assert_not_exists HasFDerivAt
assert_not_exists ConformalAt
noncomputable section
open Real Set
open Real
open RealInnerProductSpace
namespace InnerProductGeometry
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] {x y : V}
def angle (x y : V) : ℝ :=
Real.arccos (⟪x, y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖))
#align inner_product_geometry.angle InnerProductGeometry.angle
theorem continuousAt_angle {x : V × V} (hx1 : x.1 ≠ 0) (hx2 : x.2 ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : V × V => angle y.1 y.2) x :=
Real.continuous_arccos.continuousAt.comp <|
continuous_inner.continuousAt.div
((continuous_norm.comp continuous_fst).mul (continuous_norm.comp continuous_snd)).continuousAt
(by simp [hx1, hx2])
#align inner_product_geometry.continuous_at_angle InnerProductGeometry.continuousAt_angle
theorem angle_smul_smul {c : ℝ} (hc : c ≠ 0) (x y : V) : angle (c • x) (c • y) = angle x y := by
have : c * c ≠ 0 := mul_ne_zero hc hc
rw [angle, angle, real_inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, norm_smul, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs,
mul_mul_mul_comm _ ‖x‖, abs_mul_abs_self, ← mul_assoc c c, mul_div_mul_left _ _ this]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_smul_smul InnerProductGeometry.angle_smul_smul
@[simp]
theorem _root_.LinearIsometry.angle_map {E F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[InnerProductSpace ℝ E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F] (f : E →ₗᵢ[ℝ] F) (u v : E) :
angle (f u) (f v) = angle u v := by
rw [angle, angle, f.inner_map_map, f.norm_map, f.norm_map]
#align linear_isometry.angle_map LinearIsometry.angle_map
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem _root_.Submodule.angle_coe {s : Submodule ℝ V} (x y : s) :
angle (x : V) (y : V) = angle x y :=
s.subtypeₗᵢ.angle_map x y
#align submodule.angle_coe Submodule.angle_coe
theorem cos_angle (x y : V) : Real.cos (angle x y) = ⟪x, y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) :=
Real.cos_arccos (abs_le.mp (abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one x y)).1
(abs_le.mp (abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one x y)).2
#align inner_product_geometry.cos_angle InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle
theorem angle_comm (x y : V) : angle x y = angle y x := by
unfold angle
rw [real_inner_comm, mul_comm]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_comm InnerProductGeometry.angle_comm
@[simp]
theorem angle_neg_neg (x y : V) : angle (-x) (-y) = angle x y := by
unfold angle
rw [inner_neg_neg, norm_neg, norm_neg]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_neg_neg InnerProductGeometry.angle_neg_neg
theorem angle_nonneg (x y : V) : 0 ≤ angle x y :=
Real.arccos_nonneg _
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_nonneg InnerProductGeometry.angle_nonneg
theorem angle_le_pi (x y : V) : angle x y ≤ π :=
Real.arccos_le_pi _
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_le_pi InnerProductGeometry.angle_le_pi
theorem angle_neg_right (x y : V) : angle x (-y) = π - angle x y := by
unfold angle
rw [← Real.arccos_neg, norm_neg, inner_neg_right, neg_div]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_neg_right InnerProductGeometry.angle_neg_right
theorem angle_neg_left (x y : V) : angle (-x) y = π - angle x y := by
rw [← angle_neg_neg, neg_neg, angle_neg_right]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_neg_left InnerProductGeometry.angle_neg_left
proof_wanted angle_triangle (x y z : V) : angle x z ≤ angle x y + angle y z
@[simp]
theorem angle_zero_left (x : V) : angle 0 x = π / 2 := by
unfold angle
rw [inner_zero_left, zero_div, Real.arccos_zero]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_zero_left InnerProductGeometry.angle_zero_left
@[simp]
theorem angle_zero_right (x : V) : angle x 0 = π / 2 := by
unfold angle
rw [inner_zero_right, zero_div, Real.arccos_zero]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_zero_right InnerProductGeometry.angle_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem angle_self {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : angle x x = 0 := by
unfold angle
rw [← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, div_self (inner_self_ne_zero.2 hx : ⟪x, x⟫ ≠ 0),
Real.arccos_one]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_self InnerProductGeometry.angle_self
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Unoriented/Basic.lean | 142 | 143 | theorem angle_self_neg_of_nonzero {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : angle x (-x) = π := by |
rw [angle_neg_right, angle_self hx, sub_zero]
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Decomposition.RadonNikodym
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.OfBasis
import Mathlib.Probability.Independence.Basic
#align_import probability.density from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c14c8fcde993801fca8946b0d80131a1a81d1520"
open scoped Classical MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Measure
noncomputable section
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω E : Type*} [MeasurableSpace E]
class HasPDF {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} (X : Ω → E) (ℙ : Measure Ω)
(μ : Measure E := by volume_tac) : Prop where
pdf' : AEMeasurable X ℙ ∧ (map X ℙ).HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ ∧ map X ℙ ≪ μ
#align measure_theory.has_pdf MeasureTheory.HasPDF
def pdf {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} (X : Ω → E) (ℙ : Measure Ω) (μ : Measure E := by volume_tac) :
E → ℝ≥0∞ :=
(map X ℙ).rnDeriv μ
#align measure_theory.pdf MeasureTheory.pdf
theorem pdf_def {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {ℙ : Measure Ω} {μ : Measure E} {X : Ω → E} :
pdf X ℙ μ = (map X ℙ).rnDeriv μ := rfl
| Mathlib/Probability/Density.lean | 142 | 145 | theorem pdf_of_not_aemeasurable {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {ℙ : Measure Ω} {μ : Measure E}
{X : Ω → E} (hX : ¬AEMeasurable X ℙ) : pdf X ℙ μ =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by |
rw [pdf_def, map_of_not_aemeasurable hX]
exact rnDeriv_zero μ
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.ExpDeriv
#align_import analysis.ODE.gronwall from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace ℝ F]
open Metric Set Asymptotics Filter Real
open scoped Classical Topology NNReal
noncomputable def gronwallBound (δ K ε x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
if K = 0 then δ + ε * x else δ * exp (K * x) + ε / K * (exp (K * x) - 1)
#align gronwall_bound gronwallBound
theorem gronwallBound_K0 (δ ε : ℝ) : gronwallBound δ 0 ε = fun x => δ + ε * x :=
funext fun _ => if_pos rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align gronwall_bound_K0 gronwallBound_K0
theorem gronwallBound_of_K_ne_0 {δ K ε : ℝ} (hK : K ≠ 0) :
gronwallBound δ K ε = fun x => δ * exp (K * x) + ε / K * (exp (K * x) - 1) :=
funext fun _ => if_neg hK
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align gronwall_bound_of_K_ne_0 gronwallBound_of_K_ne_0
| Mathlib/Analysis/ODE/Gronwall.lean | 59 | 70 | theorem hasDerivAt_gronwallBound (δ K ε x : ℝ) :
HasDerivAt (gronwallBound δ K ε) (K * gronwallBound δ K ε x + ε) x := by |
by_cases hK : K = 0
· subst K
simp only [gronwallBound_K0, zero_mul, zero_add]
convert ((hasDerivAt_id x).const_mul ε).const_add δ
rw [mul_one]
· simp only [gronwallBound_of_K_ne_0 hK]
convert (((hasDerivAt_id x).const_mul K).exp.const_mul δ).add
((((hasDerivAt_id x).const_mul K).exp.sub_const 1).const_mul (ε / K)) using 1
simp only [id, mul_add, (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, mul_comm _ K, mul_div_cancel₀ _ hK]
ring
|
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite
import Mathlib.Order.Partition.Finpartition
#align_import data.setoid.partition from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b363547b3113d350d053abdf2884e9850a56b205"
namespace Setoid
variable {α : Type*}
theorem eq_of_mem_eqv_class {c : Set (Set α)} (H : ∀ a, ∃! b ∈ c, a ∈ b) {x b b'}
(hc : b ∈ c) (hb : x ∈ b) (hc' : b' ∈ c) (hb' : x ∈ b') : b = b' :=
(H x).unique ⟨hc, hb⟩ ⟨hc', hb'⟩
#align setoid.eq_of_mem_eqv_class Setoid.eq_of_mem_eqv_class
def mkClasses (c : Set (Set α)) (H : ∀ a, ∃! b ∈ c, a ∈ b) : Setoid α where
r x y := ∀ s ∈ c, x ∈ s → y ∈ s
iseqv.refl := fun _ _ _ hx => hx
iseqv.symm := fun {x _y} h s hs hy => by
obtain ⟨t, ⟨ht, hx⟩, _⟩ := H x
rwa [eq_of_mem_eqv_class H hs hy ht (h t ht hx)]
iseqv.trans := fun {_x y z} h1 h2 s hs hx => h2 s hs (h1 s hs hx)
#align setoid.mk_classes Setoid.mkClasses
def classes (r : Setoid α) : Set (Set α) :=
{ s | ∃ y, s = { x | r.Rel x y } }
#align setoid.classes Setoid.classes
theorem mem_classes (r : Setoid α) (y) : { x | r.Rel x y } ∈ r.classes :=
⟨y, rfl⟩
#align setoid.mem_classes Setoid.mem_classes
theorem classes_ker_subset_fiber_set {β : Type*} (f : α → β) :
(Setoid.ker f).classes ⊆ Set.range fun y => { x | f x = y } := by
rintro s ⟨x, rfl⟩
rw [Set.mem_range]
exact ⟨f x, rfl⟩
#align setoid.classes_ker_subset_fiber_set Setoid.classes_ker_subset_fiber_set
theorem finite_classes_ker {α β : Type*} [Finite β] (f : α → β) : (Setoid.ker f).classes.Finite :=
(Set.finite_range _).subset <| classes_ker_subset_fiber_set f
#align setoid.finite_classes_ker Setoid.finite_classes_ker
theorem card_classes_ker_le {α β : Type*} [Fintype β] (f : α → β)
[Fintype (Setoid.ker f).classes] : Fintype.card (Setoid.ker f).classes ≤ Fintype.card β := by
classical exact
le_trans (Set.card_le_card (classes_ker_subset_fiber_set f)) (Fintype.card_range_le _)
#align setoid.card_classes_ker_le Setoid.card_classes_ker_le
theorem eq_iff_classes_eq {r₁ r₂ : Setoid α} :
r₁ = r₂ ↔ ∀ x, { y | r₁.Rel x y } = { y | r₂.Rel x y } :=
⟨fun h _x => h ▸ rfl, fun h => ext' fun x => Set.ext_iff.1 <| h x⟩
#align setoid.eq_iff_classes_eq Setoid.eq_iff_classes_eq
theorem rel_iff_exists_classes (r : Setoid α) {x y} : r.Rel x y ↔ ∃ c ∈ r.classes, x ∈ c ∧ y ∈ c :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, r.mem_classes y, h, r.refl' y⟩, fun ⟨c, ⟨z, hz⟩, hx, hy⟩ => by
subst c
exact r.trans' hx (r.symm' hy)⟩
#align setoid.rel_iff_exists_classes Setoid.rel_iff_exists_classes
theorem classes_inj {r₁ r₂ : Setoid α} : r₁ = r₂ ↔ r₁.classes = r₂.classes :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ rfl, fun h => ext' fun a b => by simp only [rel_iff_exists_classes, exists_prop, h]⟩
#align setoid.classes_inj Setoid.classes_inj
theorem empty_not_mem_classes {r : Setoid α} : ∅ ∉ r.classes := fun ⟨y, hy⟩ =>
Set.not_mem_empty y <| hy.symm ▸ r.refl' y
#align setoid.empty_not_mem_classes Setoid.empty_not_mem_classes
theorem classes_eqv_classes {r : Setoid α} (a) : ∃! b ∈ r.classes, a ∈ b :=
ExistsUnique.intro { x | r.Rel x a } ⟨r.mem_classes a, r.refl' _⟩ <| by
rintro y ⟨⟨_, rfl⟩, ha⟩
ext x
exact ⟨fun hx => r.trans' hx (r.symm' ha), fun hx => r.trans' hx ha⟩
#align setoid.classes_eqv_classes Setoid.classes_eqv_classes
theorem eq_of_mem_classes {r : Setoid α} {x b} (hc : b ∈ r.classes) (hb : x ∈ b) {b'}
(hc' : b' ∈ r.classes) (hb' : x ∈ b') : b = b' :=
eq_of_mem_eqv_class classes_eqv_classes hc hb hc' hb'
#align setoid.eq_of_mem_classes Setoid.eq_of_mem_classes
theorem eq_eqv_class_of_mem {c : Set (Set α)} (H : ∀ a, ∃! b ∈ c, a ∈ b) {s y}
(hs : s ∈ c) (hy : y ∈ s) : s = { x | (mkClasses c H).Rel x y } := by
ext x
constructor
· intro hx _s' hs' hx'
rwa [eq_of_mem_eqv_class H hs' hx' hs hx]
· intro hx
obtain ⟨b', ⟨hc, hb'⟩, _⟩ := H x
rwa [eq_of_mem_eqv_class H hs hy hc (hx b' hc hb')]
#align setoid.eq_eqv_class_of_mem Setoid.eq_eqv_class_of_mem
theorem eqv_class_mem {c : Set (Set α)} (H : ∀ a, ∃! b ∈ c, a ∈ b) {y} :
{ x | (mkClasses c H).Rel x y } ∈ c :=
(H y).elim fun _ hc _ => eq_eqv_class_of_mem H hc.1 hc.2 ▸ hc.1
#align setoid.eqv_class_mem Setoid.eqv_class_mem
theorem eqv_class_mem' {c : Set (Set α)} (H : ∀ a, ∃! b ∈ c, a ∈ b) {x} :
{ y : α | (mkClasses c H).Rel x y } ∈ c := by
convert @Setoid.eqv_class_mem _ _ H x using 3
rw [Setoid.comm']
#align setoid.eqv_class_mem' Setoid.eqv_class_mem'
theorem eqv_classes_disjoint {c : Set (Set α)} (H : ∀ a, ∃! b ∈ c, a ∈ b) :
c.PairwiseDisjoint id := fun _b₁ h₁ _b₂ h₂ h =>
Set.disjoint_left.2 fun x hx1 hx2 =>
(H x).elim fun _b _hc _hx => h <| eq_of_mem_eqv_class H h₁ hx1 h₂ hx2
#align setoid.eqv_classes_disjoint Setoid.eqv_classes_disjoint
theorem eqv_classes_of_disjoint_union {c : Set (Set α)} (hu : Set.sUnion c = @Set.univ α)
(H : c.PairwiseDisjoint id) (a) : ∃! b ∈ c, a ∈ b :=
let ⟨b, hc, ha⟩ := Set.mem_sUnion.1 <| show a ∈ _ by rw [hu]; exact Set.mem_univ a
ExistsUnique.intro b ⟨hc, ha⟩ fun b' hc' => H.elim_set hc'.1 hc _ hc'.2 ha
#align setoid.eqv_classes_of_disjoint_union Setoid.eqv_classes_of_disjoint_union
def setoidOfDisjointUnion {c : Set (Set α)} (hu : Set.sUnion c = @Set.univ α)
(H : c.PairwiseDisjoint id) : Setoid α :=
Setoid.mkClasses c <| eqv_classes_of_disjoint_union hu H
#align setoid.setoid_of_disjoint_union Setoid.setoidOfDisjointUnion
theorem mkClasses_classes (r : Setoid α) : mkClasses r.classes classes_eqv_classes = r :=
ext' fun x _y =>
⟨fun h => r.symm' (h { z | r.Rel z x } (r.mem_classes x) <| r.refl' x), fun h _b hb hx =>
eq_of_mem_classes (r.mem_classes x) (r.refl' x) hb hx ▸ r.symm' h⟩
#align setoid.mk_classes_classes Setoid.mkClasses_classes
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_classes (r : Setoid α) : ⋃₀ r.classes = Set.univ :=
Set.eq_univ_of_forall fun x => Set.mem_sUnion.2 ⟨{ y | r.Rel y x }, ⟨x, rfl⟩, Setoid.refl _⟩
#align setoid.sUnion_classes Setoid.sUnion_classes
noncomputable def quotientEquivClasses (r : Setoid α) : Quotient r ≃ Setoid.classes r := by
let f (a : α) : Setoid.classes r := ⟨{ x | Setoid.r x a }, Setoid.mem_classes r a⟩
have f_respects_relation (a b : α) (a_rel_b : Setoid.r a b) : f a = f b := by
rw [Subtype.mk.injEq]
exact Setoid.eq_of_mem_classes (Setoid.mem_classes r a) (Setoid.symm a_rel_b)
(Setoid.mem_classes r b) (Setoid.refl b)
apply Equiv.ofBijective (Quot.lift f f_respects_relation)
constructor
· intro (q_a : Quotient r) (q_b : Quotient r) h_eq
induction' q_a using Quotient.ind with a
induction' q_b using Quotient.ind with b
simp only [Subtype.ext_iff, Quotient.lift_mk, Subtype.ext_iff] at h_eq
apply Quotient.sound
show a ∈ { x | Setoid.r x b }
rw [← h_eq]
exact Setoid.refl a
· rw [Quot.surjective_lift]
intro ⟨c, a, hc⟩
exact ⟨a, Subtype.ext hc.symm⟩
@[simp]
lemma quotientEquivClasses_mk_eq (r : Setoid α) (a : α) :
(quotientEquivClasses r (Quotient.mk r a) : Set α) = { x | r.Rel x a } :=
(@Subtype.ext_iff_val _ _ _ ⟨{ x | r.Rel x a }, Setoid.mem_classes r a⟩).mp rfl
section Partition
def IsPartition (c : Set (Set α)) := ∅ ∉ c ∧ ∀ a, ∃! b ∈ c, a ∈ b
#align setoid.is_partition Setoid.IsPartition
theorem nonempty_of_mem_partition {c : Set (Set α)} (hc : IsPartition c) {s} (h : s ∈ c) :
s.Nonempty :=
Set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2 fun hs0 => hc.1 <| hs0 ▸ h
#align setoid.nonempty_of_mem_partition Setoid.nonempty_of_mem_partition
theorem isPartition_classes (r : Setoid α) : IsPartition r.classes :=
⟨empty_not_mem_classes, classes_eqv_classes⟩
#align setoid.is_partition_classes Setoid.isPartition_classes
theorem IsPartition.pairwiseDisjoint {c : Set (Set α)} (hc : IsPartition c) :
c.PairwiseDisjoint id :=
eqv_classes_disjoint hc.2
#align setoid.is_partition.pairwise_disjoint Setoid.IsPartition.pairwiseDisjoint
lemma _root_.Set.PairwiseDisjoint.isPartition_of_exists_of_ne_empty {α : Type*} {s : Set (Set α)}
(h₁ : s.PairwiseDisjoint id) (h₂ : ∀ a : α, ∃ x ∈ s, a ∈ x) (h₃ : ∅ ∉ s) :
Setoid.IsPartition s := by
refine ⟨h₃, fun a ↦ exists_unique_of_exists_of_unique (h₂ a) ?_⟩
intro b₁ b₂ hb₁ hb₂
apply h₁.elim hb₁.1 hb₂.1
simp only [Set.not_disjoint_iff]
exact ⟨a, hb₁.2, hb₂.2⟩
theorem IsPartition.sUnion_eq_univ {c : Set (Set α)} (hc : IsPartition c) : ⋃₀ c = Set.univ :=
Set.eq_univ_of_forall fun x =>
Set.mem_sUnion.2 <|
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := hc.2 x
⟨t, by
simp only [exists_unique_iff_exists] at ht
tauto⟩
#align setoid.is_partition.sUnion_eq_univ Setoid.IsPartition.sUnion_eq_univ
theorem exists_of_mem_partition {c : Set (Set α)} (hc : IsPartition c) {s} (hs : s ∈ c) :
∃ y, s = { x | (mkClasses c hc.2).Rel x y } :=
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := nonempty_of_mem_partition hc hs
⟨y, eq_eqv_class_of_mem hc.2 hs hy⟩
#align setoid.exists_of_mem_partition Setoid.exists_of_mem_partition
| Mathlib/Data/Setoid/Partition.lean | 255 | 262 | theorem classes_mkClasses (c : Set (Set α)) (hc : IsPartition c) :
(mkClasses c hc.2).classes = c := by |
ext s
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨b, ⟨hb, hy⟩, _⟩ := hc.2 y
rwa [← eq_eqv_class_of_mem _ hb hy]
· exact exists_of_mem_partition hc
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Dirac
set_option autoImplicit true
open Set
open scoped ENNReal Classical
variable [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] {s : Set α}
noncomputable section
namespace MeasureTheory.Measure
def count : Measure α :=
sum dirac
#align measure_theory.measure.count MeasureTheory.Measure.count
theorem le_count_apply : ∑' _ : s, (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ count s :=
calc
(∑' _ : s, 1 : ℝ≥0∞) = ∑' i, indicator s 1 i := tsum_subtype s 1
_ ≤ ∑' i, dirac i s := ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun _ => le_dirac_apply
_ ≤ count s := le_sum_apply _ _
#align measure_theory.measure.le_count_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.le_count_apply
theorem count_apply (hs : MeasurableSet s) : count s = ∑' i : s, 1 := by
simp only [count, sum_apply, hs, dirac_apply', ← tsum_subtype s (1 : α → ℝ≥0∞), Pi.one_apply]
#align measure_theory.measure.count_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.count_apply
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem count_empty : count (∅ : Set α) = 0 := by rw [count_apply MeasurableSet.empty, tsum_empty]
#align measure_theory.measure.count_empty MeasureTheory.Measure.count_empty
@[simp]
theorem count_apply_finset' {s : Finset α} (s_mble : MeasurableSet (s : Set α)) :
count (↑s : Set α) = s.card :=
calc
count (↑s : Set α) = ∑' i : (↑s : Set α), 1 := count_apply s_mble
_ = ∑ i ∈ s, 1 := s.tsum_subtype 1
_ = s.card := by simp
#align measure_theory.measure.count_apply_finset' MeasureTheory.Measure.count_apply_finset'
@[simp]
theorem count_apply_finset [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (s : Finset α) :
count (↑s : Set α) = s.card :=
count_apply_finset' s.measurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure.count_apply_finset MeasureTheory.Measure.count_apply_finset
theorem count_apply_finite' {s : Set α} (s_fin : s.Finite) (s_mble : MeasurableSet s) :
count s = s_fin.toFinset.card := by
simp [←
@count_apply_finset' _ _ s_fin.toFinset (by simpa only [Finite.coe_toFinset] using s_mble)]
#align measure_theory.measure.count_apply_finite' MeasureTheory.Measure.count_apply_finite'
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Count.lean | 68 | 69 | theorem count_apply_finite [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (s : Set α) (hs : s.Finite) :
count s = hs.toFinset.card := by | rw [← count_apply_finset, Finite.coe_toFinset]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.CartanSubalgebra
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Weights.Basic
suppress_compilation
open Set
variable {R L : Type*} [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L]
(H : LieSubalgebra R L) [LieAlgebra.IsNilpotent R H]
{M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M] [LieModule R L M]
namespace LieAlgebra
open scoped TensorProduct
open TensorProduct.LieModule LieModule
abbrev rootSpace (χ : H → R) : LieSubmodule R H L :=
weightSpace L χ
#align lie_algebra.root_space LieAlgebra.rootSpace
theorem zero_rootSpace_eq_top_of_nilpotent [IsNilpotent R L] :
rootSpace (⊤ : LieSubalgebra R L) 0 = ⊤ :=
zero_weightSpace_eq_top_of_nilpotent L
#align lie_algebra.zero_root_space_eq_top_of_nilpotent LieAlgebra.zero_rootSpace_eq_top_of_nilpotent
@[simp]
theorem rootSpace_comap_eq_weightSpace (χ : H → R) :
(rootSpace H χ).comap H.incl' = weightSpace H χ :=
comap_weightSpace_eq_of_injective Subtype.coe_injective
#align lie_algebra.root_space_comap_eq_weight_space LieAlgebra.rootSpace_comap_eq_weightSpace
variable {H}
theorem lie_mem_weightSpace_of_mem_weightSpace {χ₁ χ₂ : H → R} {x : L} {m : M}
(hx : x ∈ rootSpace H χ₁) (hm : m ∈ weightSpace M χ₂) : ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ weightSpace M (χ₁ + χ₂) := by
rw [weightSpace, LieSubmodule.mem_iInf]
intro y
replace hx : x ∈ weightSpaceOf L (χ₁ y) y := by
rw [rootSpace, weightSpace, LieSubmodule.mem_iInf] at hx; exact hx y
replace hm : m ∈ weightSpaceOf M (χ₂ y) y := by
rw [weightSpace, LieSubmodule.mem_iInf] at hm; exact hm y
exact lie_mem_maxGenEigenspace_toEnd hx hm
#align lie_algebra.lie_mem_weight_space_of_mem_weight_space LieAlgebra.lie_mem_weightSpace_of_mem_weightSpace
lemma toEnd_pow_apply_mem {χ₁ χ₂ : H → R} {x : L} {m : M}
(hx : x ∈ rootSpace H χ₁) (hm : m ∈ weightSpace M χ₂) (n) :
(toEnd R L M x ^ n : Module.End R M) m ∈ weightSpace M (n • χ₁ + χ₂) := by
induction n
· simpa using hm
· next n IH =>
simp only [pow_succ', LinearMap.mul_apply, toEnd_apply_apply,
Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, rootSpace]
convert lie_mem_weightSpace_of_mem_weightSpace hx IH using 2
rw [succ_nsmul, ← add_assoc, add_comm (n • _)]
variable (R L H M)
def rootSpaceWeightSpaceProductAux {χ₁ χ₂ χ₃ : H → R} (hχ : χ₁ + χ₂ = χ₃) :
rootSpace H χ₁ →ₗ[R] weightSpace M χ₂ →ₗ[R] weightSpace M χ₃ where
toFun x :=
{ toFun := fun m =>
⟨⁅(x : L), (m : M)⁆, hχ ▸ lie_mem_weightSpace_of_mem_weightSpace x.property m.property⟩
map_add' := fun m n => by simp only [LieSubmodule.coe_add, lie_add]; rfl
map_smul' := fun t m => by
dsimp only
conv_lhs =>
congr
rw [LieSubmodule.coe_smul, lie_smul]
rfl }
map_add' x y := by
ext m
simp only [AddSubmonoid.coe_add, Submodule.coe_toAddSubmonoid, add_lie, LinearMap.coe_mk,
AddHom.coe_mk, LinearMap.add_apply, AddSubmonoid.mk_add_mk]
map_smul' t x := by
simp only [RingHom.id_apply]
ext m
simp only [SetLike.val_smul, smul_lie, LinearMap.coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk, LinearMap.smul_apply,
SetLike.mk_smul_mk]
#align lie_algebra.root_space_weight_space_product_aux LieAlgebra.rootSpaceWeightSpaceProductAux
-- Porting note (#11083): this def is _really_ slow
-- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5028
def rootSpaceWeightSpaceProduct (χ₁ χ₂ χ₃ : H → R) (hχ : χ₁ + χ₂ = χ₃) :
rootSpace H χ₁ ⊗[R] weightSpace M χ₂ →ₗ⁅R,H⁆ weightSpace M χ₃ :=
liftLie R H (rootSpace H χ₁) (weightSpace M χ₂) (weightSpace M χ₃)
{ toLinearMap := rootSpaceWeightSpaceProductAux R L H M hχ
map_lie' := fun {x y} => by
ext m
simp only [rootSpaceWeightSpaceProductAux, LieSubmodule.coe_bracket,
LieSubalgebra.coe_bracket_of_module, lie_lie, LinearMap.coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk,
Subtype.coe_mk, LieHom.lie_apply, LieSubmodule.coe_sub] }
#align lie_algebra.root_space_weight_space_product LieAlgebra.rootSpaceWeightSpaceProduct
@[simp]
theorem coe_rootSpaceWeightSpaceProduct_tmul (χ₁ χ₂ χ₃ : H → R) (hχ : χ₁ + χ₂ = χ₃)
(x : rootSpace H χ₁) (m : weightSpace M χ₂) :
(rootSpaceWeightSpaceProduct R L H M χ₁ χ₂ χ₃ hχ (x ⊗ₜ m) : M) = ⁅(x : L), (m : M)⁆ := by
simp only [rootSpaceWeightSpaceProduct, rootSpaceWeightSpaceProductAux, coe_liftLie_eq_lift_coe,
AddHom.toFun_eq_coe, LinearMap.coe_toAddHom, lift_apply, LinearMap.coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk,
Submodule.coe_mk]
#align lie_algebra.coe_root_space_weight_space_product_tmul LieAlgebra.coe_rootSpaceWeightSpaceProduct_tmul
theorem mapsTo_toEnd_weightSpace_add_of_mem_rootSpace (α χ : H → R)
{x : L} (hx : x ∈ rootSpace H α) :
MapsTo (toEnd R L M x) (weightSpace M χ) (weightSpace M (α + χ)) := by
intro m hm
let x' : rootSpace H α := ⟨x, hx⟩
let m' : weightSpace M χ := ⟨m, hm⟩
exact (rootSpaceWeightSpaceProduct R L H M α χ (α + χ) rfl (x' ⊗ₜ m')).property
def rootSpaceProduct (χ₁ χ₂ χ₃ : H → R) (hχ : χ₁ + χ₂ = χ₃) :
rootSpace H χ₁ ⊗[R] rootSpace H χ₂ →ₗ⁅R,H⁆ rootSpace H χ₃ :=
rootSpaceWeightSpaceProduct R L H L χ₁ χ₂ χ₃ hχ
#align lie_algebra.root_space_product LieAlgebra.rootSpaceProduct
@[simp]
theorem rootSpaceProduct_def : rootSpaceProduct R L H = rootSpaceWeightSpaceProduct R L H L := rfl
#align lie_algebra.root_space_product_def LieAlgebra.rootSpaceProduct_def
theorem rootSpaceProduct_tmul
(χ₁ χ₂ χ₃ : H → R) (hχ : χ₁ + χ₂ = χ₃) (x : rootSpace H χ₁) (y : rootSpace H χ₂) :
(rootSpaceProduct R L H χ₁ χ₂ χ₃ hχ (x ⊗ₜ y) : L) = ⁅(x : L), (y : L)⁆ := by
simp only [rootSpaceProduct_def, coe_rootSpaceWeightSpaceProduct_tmul]
#align lie_algebra.root_space_product_tmul LieAlgebra.rootSpaceProduct_tmul
def zeroRootSubalgebra : LieSubalgebra R L :=
{ toSubmodule := (rootSpace H 0 : Submodule R L)
lie_mem' := fun {x y hx hy} => by
let xy : rootSpace H 0 ⊗[R] rootSpace H 0 := ⟨x, hx⟩ ⊗ₜ ⟨y, hy⟩
suffices (rootSpaceProduct R L H 0 0 0 (add_zero 0) xy : L) ∈ rootSpace H 0 by
rwa [rootSpaceProduct_tmul, Subtype.coe_mk, Subtype.coe_mk] at this
exact (rootSpaceProduct R L H 0 0 0 (add_zero 0) xy).property }
#align lie_algebra.zero_root_subalgebra LieAlgebra.zeroRootSubalgebra
@[simp]
theorem coe_zeroRootSubalgebra : (zeroRootSubalgebra R L H : Submodule R L) = rootSpace H 0 := rfl
#align lie_algebra.coe_zero_root_subalgebra LieAlgebra.coe_zeroRootSubalgebra
theorem mem_zeroRootSubalgebra (x : L) :
x ∈ zeroRootSubalgebra R L H ↔ ∀ y : H, ∃ k : ℕ, (toEnd R H L y ^ k) x = 0 := by
change x ∈ rootSpace H 0 ↔ _
simp only [mem_weightSpace, Pi.zero_apply, zero_smul, sub_zero]
#align lie_algebra.mem_zero_root_subalgebra LieAlgebra.mem_zeroRootSubalgebra
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Weights/Cartan.lean | 181 | 202 | theorem toLieSubmodule_le_rootSpace_zero : H.toLieSubmodule ≤ rootSpace H 0 := by |
intro x hx
simp only [LieSubalgebra.mem_toLieSubmodule] at hx
simp only [mem_weightSpace, Pi.zero_apply, sub_zero, zero_smul]
intro y
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := (inferInstance : IsNilpotent R H)
use k
let f : Module.End R H := toEnd R H H y
let g : Module.End R L := toEnd R H L y
have hfg : g.comp (H : Submodule R L).subtype = (H : Submodule R L).subtype.comp f := by
ext z
simp only [toEnd_apply_apply, Submodule.subtype_apply,
LieSubalgebra.coe_bracket_of_module, LieSubalgebra.coe_bracket, Function.comp_apply,
LinearMap.coe_comp]
rfl
change (g ^ k).comp (H : Submodule R L).subtype ⟨x, hx⟩ = 0
rw [LinearMap.commute_pow_left_of_commute hfg k]
have h := iterate_toEnd_mem_lowerCentralSeries R H H y ⟨x, hx⟩ k
rw [hk, LieSubmodule.mem_bot] at h
simp only [Submodule.subtype_apply, Function.comp_apply, LinearMap.pow_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp,
Submodule.coe_eq_zero]
exact h
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.